reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@LegendreKristy - Kristy Legendre
In his own words! https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRcbGquq/
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the game show "Is It Racist?" and shares personal experiences of being tokenized based on race, gender, and age. They mention the outsourcing of call centers and make a comment about Haiti.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. I'm not smart. I I I may be a white boy, but I'm not stupid, which segues nicely into the world's favorite new game show, Is It Racist? They're gonna put you all back in chains. Even call centers, even call centers was rushed overseas in the hundreds of thousands.
How many times do you get to call? I'd like to talk to you about your credit card. Because I was 29, I'm like the token black or the token woman. I was a token young person. Is it racist?
You know, I've adopted the attitude of the great Negro at the time. This is our toughest Is It Racist yet. If Haiti just quietly sunk into the Caribbean or rose up 300 feet, It wouldn't matter a whole lot.
Explore - Find your favourite videos on TikTok
Discover the latest TikTok videos on our Explore page. Stay up-to-date on the latest trends and explore your interests here!
tiktok.com
@LegendreKristy - Kristy Legendre
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
There you go….he finally came right out and said it https://t.co/keketwmqlJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
My mother used to say that even in terrible situations, there is always some good that can come out of it if you search for it. We are currently at a crucial point in the world economy, which only happens every few generations. During a recent secure meeting, a top military official mentioned that between 1919 and 1946, around 60 million people died. However, we managed to establish a more peaceful world order since then. Now, things are shifting again, and a new world order is emerging. It is our responsibility to lead and unite the rest of the free world in this endeavor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think, you know, my mother had an expression. Out of everything terrible, some will good will come if you look hard enough for it. I think this presents us with some sick significant opportunities to make some real changes. You know, we are in an inflection point, I believe, in the world economy. Not just world economy in the world, like, occurs every 3 or 4 generations.
As one of my as the, one of the top military people said to me in a secure meeting the other day. 6060,000,000 people died between 1919 46 and, since then we established a liberal world order and that hadn't happened in a long while. A lot of people died, but nowhere near the chaos. And now is the time when things are shifting. We're gonna they're gonna be a new world order out there, and we've gotta lead it.
We've gotta unite the rest of the free world in doing
@keira_con - Keira Connnolly
No Comment : Just Watch The Video https://t.co/aKfDDQtZrG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the need for more diversity in the public service, particularly in senior positions. They suggest setting targets and implementing dedicated recruitment campaigns to encourage people from ethnic minority backgrounds to join. They highlight the lack of representation in various sectors, including the health service, defense forces, education, and civil service. The speaker believes that visibility and opportunities for people of color are crucial. Another speaker lists numerous positions and roles that are predominantly held by white individuals, ranging from high court judges to trade union leaders, highlighting the lack of diversity in these areas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One thing I strongly agree with the deputy on is the need to target set a target to have a a number of people from ethnic minorities in areas of the public service, we have a health service that's very diverse, although less so as you go up towards the senior positions, not so much in the guardee, not so much in the defense forces, Not so much in the education sector as deputy mentioned. Not at all in the civil service, which is very white, including the Department of Equality, for example. And that actually needs to change. So we need to have, I think, a target for people who come from ethnic minority backgrounds, but also dedicated recruitment campaigns to encourage people because we do need a generation of young people growing up in Ireland who are people of color to see black and brown school principals, judges, King Carl perhaps in the future. Who knows?
Visibility, an opportunity is really important.
Speaker 1: The lord justice Clark, white. Every high court judge, White. The Lord Advocate, White. The Sylvester General, White. The chief constable, White.
Every deputy chief constable, White. Every assistant chief constable, White. The head of the law society, White. The head of the faculty of advocates, White. Every prison Governor White.
And not just justice, the chief medical officer White, the chief nursing officer White, the chief veterinary officer White, The chief social work advisor, white. Almost every trade union in this country headed by people who are white. In the Scottish government, every director general is white. Every chair of every public body is white.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHAT DID HE JUST SAY? https://t.co/0OMfFctDDD
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump is leading in a morning consult poll in seven swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The poll shows that he is ahead of President Biden in all of these areas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The president is leading, nationally on a morning consult poll. He's leading with 7 swing states. Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. So that is actually the poll against president Biden, the fake fake president. You know, you could see that President Trump is leading against, Richard Biden in all of those areas.
@historyinmemes - Historic Vids
The internet will never forget this clip https://t.co/vdN2Kv5Zns
Video Transcript AI Summary
I only like chicken nuggets. They're good. For breakfast, I want chicken nuggets. Chicken nuggets are like family to me. I'm going to see if she has chicken nuggets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a very picky eater. He only likes chicken nuggets. Yay. I really do like chicken nuggets. They're good.
Curtis, what you want for breakfast? Chicken nuggets. Okay. Chicken nuggets is like my family. I'm going to go see she's got chicken nuggets.
@TruthSlingerX - Truth Slinger X
Did she really say this OUT LOUD???? https://t.co/1bnT5ecTbX
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are facing a soft coup where new laws are being created under the guise of pandemic preparedness, stripping away human rights protections. The WHO is pushing for a pandemic treaty that would enforce surveillance, censorship, and limit freedom of speech. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days. These changes would give the WHO power to dictate which drugs countries can use during a pandemic. The concept of One Health would allow the WHO to control everything globally, with a belief that humans are no more valuable than animals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're undergoing a soft coup, and the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director in the United States in charge, pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative. Also, we will be sub subject if if they can make this work to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do. And one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO to bring this forward. Other things that, amendments do is to bind the states so they have no longer recommendations, but enforceable edicts.
Provide a liability shield, ports, and the director general of who can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists, he can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will will have to obey. Also, the who will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by Also, embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
@Pooping_Puppy - Pitbull Press
@LqLana What did he just say? 👇 https://t.co/aEA3ZNi36l
Video Transcript AI Summary
The raid was to retrieve damaging documents related to the Russian collusion scandal, declassified by Trump but not released by the Biden Justice Department. Trump's statement on declassification was discussed, comparing it to a previous case involving Clinton's records. The Presidential Records Act was mentioned, highlighting differences in its application to Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And at the end of the day, as we've discussed from day 1, Steve, the whole point of this rate was because president Trump declassified the crossfire hurricane Russian collusion documents through a presidential memo on January 19, 2021. The Biden Justice Department grabbed their feet and never publicly released these documents. Trump had them. They were worried that Trump was going to release them. They know that there are these documents are very damaging for Obama, Biden, Hillary, the FBI, the intel community because they show that they cooked up the Russian collusion, scandal, the Russian collusion hoax to politically hurt Trump in 2016, and it continued to hurt him when he was the president.
And so they had to go get back these documents, and that was the purpose of this raid. They went to a biased judge, magistrate judge Bruce Reinhardt. They got, an illegal, general warrants, and they went and got 11,000 documents. And How does how does this play out? And president Trump gave an interview on Handy.
He said if he declassified anything at any time including in his head, it was declassified. Do you buy that? Well, he didn't just say in his head. He talked about his next words out of his mouth were by taking it to Mar a Lago, he declassified it. That's exactly right.
If you remember, we talked about the 2012 case involving Clinton Sartore. He had 8 years of highly classified recordings of his presidency and his software. Not that in a judicial watch sued to get these records And the Obama judge correctly held that by president putting these records to him when he left office, these classified records with him, the mere action of taking them makes them, essentially declassified and personal. That's a that's right. That's what that's how the Presidential Records Act works unless you're president Trump and you're Trump's arranged and then the Presidential Records Act is doesn't apply to president Trump.
Okay. I wanna thank you for coming on and doing that.
@AlnaouqA - Ahmed Alnaouq
He says it all. https://t.co/cadbZljjpQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Palestinians lack international support due to their lack of wealth and power, which translates to fewer rights. This parallels the disparity in rights between poor black kids in urban areas and wealthy suburban residents in the US. The national interest is driven by the wealthy elite and major corporations, not the general population's desires. Public opinion is often ignored in policy-making, with decisions favoring the wealthy elite. Active public engagement is necessary to influence policy.
Translation: The lack of international support for Palestinians is due to their poverty and powerlessness, similar to how poor black kids in cities have fewer rights than wealthy suburban residents. Government policy in the US is driven by the interests of the rich elite and major corporations, ignoring the public's desires. Public opinion is disregarded, requiring active activism to influence policy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Part of the tragedy of the Palestinians is that they have essentially no international support for a good reason. They don't have wealth, they don't have power, so they don't have rights. It's the way the world works, you know. Your rights correspond to your power and your wealth. Same inside the United States, we're not shouldn't be surprised to see it.
If you're a poor black kid in Roxbury, you don't have the rights of a rich person living in the suburbs, right. Same in the international arena. So the Palestinians, I mean, they may get statements of support, but nobody is going to do much for them, especially when the U. S. Threatens anyone who might try to do something.
What's called the national interest turns out to be the interest of dominant domestic forces in US society. So the national interest means the interests of the very rich major corporations, the ones who set government policy and so on. That's the national interest and not the population. The population is basically irrelevant. The population often strongly opposes government policy and they're simply disregarded.
Overwhelmingly, people say there should be much higher taxes on the wealthy. What happens? Taxes on the wealthy go down. And it's the same on issue after issue. We do not live in a society in which the public determines policy.
The public is around, but basically disregard it unless they force themselves to enter the system by serious activism.
@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick
WOW. Unbelievable. https://t.co/svzVsmzUoS
Video Transcript AI Summary
We were at a party near a Trump rally when we saw a man with a rifle crawling on a roof. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but shots were fired before they acted. The Secret Service shot the man, and we saw them confirm he was dead. It was a shocking experience, and we question why there wasn't more security. We also saw a woman on a horse with a flag, which seemed patriotic. It was a disturbing event, and we hope for safety for everyone involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Someone who was here. You weren't inside the event Nope. But you were just outside. Tell us what you saw and what.
Speaker 1: So so we had a party here all day. You can see behind us at the the Brinkles Farm and Greenhouse here. We had a party, and we all decided, hey. You know, when when we hear Trump up there, we're gonna walk up through the field, stand by the trees out there into the shade Yeah. And watch the rain, listen to the rally.
Right? We couldn't see him, but we could hear him. So we walked up and probably 5 to 7 minutes of Trump speaking. I'm escalating here. I have no idea, you know.
But, we noticed a guy crawling arming, you know, bear crawling up the roof of the building beside us. 50 50 feet away from us. So we're standing there, you know, we're pointing we're pointing at the guy crawling up the roof.
Speaker 0: And he had a gun. Right?
Speaker 1: He had a rifle. We can clearly see him with a rifle. Absolutely. We're pointing at him. The police are down there running around on the ground.
We're like, hey, man. There's a guy on the roof with a rifle. And the police were like, what? You know, like like, they didn't know what was going on. You know, we're like, hey, right here on the roof.
We can see him from right here. We see him. You know, he's he's crawling. And next thing you know, I'm like I'm thinking to myself. I'm like, why is Trump still speaking?
Why have they not pulled him off the stage? I'm standing there pointing at him for, you know, 2 or 3 minutes. Secret service is looking at us from the top of the barn. I'm pointing at that roof just standing there like this, and next thing you know, 5 shots ring out.
Speaker 0: So you're you're almost certain that the shots came from that guy on the roof?
Speaker 1: A 100%. 100%. And he he was up there
Speaker 0: for a couple of minutes. Was up there. For a couple
Speaker 1: of minutes. Absolutely. At least 3 to 4 minutes
Speaker 0: And you were telling the police from the secret service.
Speaker 1: We were telling the police. We were pointing at him for the secret service who were looking at us from the top of the barn. They were looking at us the whole time when we were standing by that tree. Could they see them? Binoculars.
Could they see them? Probably not because the roof the way the the slope went, he was behind where they could see. But but why is there not secret service on all of these roofs here? I mean, this is not a big place.
Speaker 0: Did you see I mean, obviously, everyone when the shooting started, everyone was very panicked. Correct. Did you see what happened to hit him at all? Oh, yeah. They blew his head off.
Okay. Sorry.
Speaker 1: Secret Service blew his head off. Okay. Just be careful because we don't
Speaker 0: even find out who's watching. But you you're pretty sure they they they
Speaker 1: shot the guy? Absolutely. 100%.
Speaker 0: Yep. You you saw that happen? Yep. Yep. Okay.
Yep. And did you see them go up to him afterwards? Or
Speaker 1: They yeah. They crawled up on the roof. They had their guns pointed out and make sure he was dead. He was dead, and that was it. It was over.
That's incredibly shocking. The guy was on the roof right there. You can see the white roof right there. Did you get
Speaker 0: a look at him? Could you
Speaker 1: I I no. Other than he was in muted colors, tan type clothing. We saw the rifle flinging around as he was trying to crawl. I mean, we saw the rifle 100%.
Speaker 0: Do you I mean, do you know about guns? Do you know what kind of weapon it was?
Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely no about guns. For sure.
Speaker 0: You know?
Speaker 1: I mean, if there is a rifle of some sort, I wouldn't know, you know I wasn't close enough to read the label on it. I'm not sure. But I wasn't close enough to you. It was a rifle of some sort.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Absolutely. So what do you how do you process what you've just seen?
Speaker 1: I I don't know what to say, man. I'll tell you is, you know, if I if I walked up close to there with anything that can Secret Service considered a a problem, I wouldn't be standing here talking to you right now. But I don't know why a guy that we're standing there pointing now to police and secret service is crawling up the roof. Yes. Right there by that tree.
We were outside the security department. But my question is, there's only a few buildings around here. Why is secret service not at every building here?
Speaker 0: There's a whole bunch of questions. I think they're gonna come.
Speaker 1: There's a whole bunch of questions. Yeah. Yes, she was right in front of me. She kept going back before it's right in front of me. Yes.
Speaker 0: Tell us about that.
Speaker 1: I mean, nice horse, nice lady running with a flag. It seemed very,
Speaker 0: you know, patriotic. But what what's what's the significance of that? Okay. Alright. Well, listen.
I'm sorry you had to witness that. That was a terrible thing. And, you should stay safe with your family and, keep yourself. Thanks, Peter. Mate.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned from a senior Meta engineer, Jeevan Gyawali, that posts critical of Kamala Harris are automatically demoted without user notification, a tactic referred to as shadowbanning. He mentioned that Meta has a dedicated SWAT team to address potential platform abuses and confirmed that the company can influence election outcomes, stating that this aligns with a political agenda supporting the Democratic Party. When approached for comment on the hidden camera footage revealing these practices, Gyawali's reaction was one of surprise and concern.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
BREAKING: Senior Meta Engineer Reveals Anti-Kamala Posts Are "Automatically Demoted,” Admits Shadowbanning Tactics "Say your uncle in Ohio said something about Kamala Harris is unfit to be a president because she doesn't have a child, that kind of sh*t is automatically demoted,” reveals @Meta Senior Software Engineer, Jeevan Gyawali (@JGyawali), to an undercover @OKeefeMedia journalist during a hidden camera date. He confirmed, “The person would not be notified,” but would see a decline in their post engagement and impressions, explaining that Meta’s “Integrity Team” is responsible for controlling content through “civic classifiers,” a system that “shadowbans” posts without notifying users. Gyawali also revealed a specialized Special Weapons And Tactics (SWAT) team that was created at Meta, stating, “There is a SWAT team that's already set up since April… just to think about all the scenarios of how the platform could be abused.” When asked if Meta is doing their due diligence to protect democracy from disinformation, Gyawali ensured “that’s all going to be demoted 100%.” When asked, “You guys [Meta] have the ability to influence the outcome of the election?” Gyawali confirmed, “Yes,” admitting Meta’s power to sway political outcomes. When asked if Mark Zuckerberg (@finkd), Co-Founder and CEO and Meta, supports Meta’s political influence and agenda to help the Democratic Party, Gyawali answered, “100%.” @MetaNewsroom @andymstone
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
James O'Keefe contacted Jeevan Gyawali to request comment regarding hidden camera footage in which Gyawali discusses Meta's censorship practices. Upon hearing the details, Gyawali responded, "Ah, f*ck," before quickly ending the call. His comment speaks for itself. https://t.co/niqckI258U
Video Transcript AI Summary
James O'Keefe stated that a girl who works for him recorded someone. The person recorded was at Meta and was talking to someone else. After O'Keefe said "oh," the person hung up the phone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is James O'Keefe, and and the girl works for me. And she recorded you. You're at Meta, and you're talking to He said, oh, then he hung up the phone. So I guess the comment is
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
She DID say this Out Loud ‼️ https://t.co/gRPrvqmm2K
Video Transcript AI Summary
The WHO is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations that will remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance and censorship. The goal is to develop vaccines in 100 days.
The amendments would bind states to enforceable edicts, provide a liability shield, remove intellectual property rights, move supplies between countries, and enforce digital passports. The WHO director general can declare a pandemic with no standards, and countries must obey. The WHO will dictate which drugs can be used.
One Health is a concept to enable the WHO to take over jurisdiction, suggesting humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're undergoing a soft coup, and the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director in the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, if they can make this work to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do. And one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO to bring this forward. Other things that the amendments do is to bind the states so they have no longer recommendations, but enforceable edicts. Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from one country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of who can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists.
He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction Also, embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
@TheFigen_ - Figen
For a moment I thought he was joking. 😂 https://t.co/45pUZrRCD7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Life can be unfair, and you may face challenges that seem undeserved. In those moments, it's crucial to stay determined and keep pushing forward. Never give up, no matter the obstacles you encounter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I wanna take this opportunity to give you some advice. Over the course of your life, you will find that things are not always fair. You will find that things happen to you that you do not deserve and that are not always warranted, but you have to put your head down and fight fight fight. Never ever ever give up.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
LMAO just watch this… https://t.co/uaHQc7K1P9
Video Transcript AI Summary
The USAID funding freeze by Donald Trump is a political attack on international human rights, which will cost lives and close vital health programs. I asked the minister if he has spoken to his US counterpart about reversing this decision.
I have not yet engaged with Secretary Rubio on these matters, as we are in a process of review.
We've already done an initial assessment on the implications. A lot of damage can be done in ninety days. Aid organizations say this will have a disastrous impact. If the government has looked at the impacted projects, will they step up and add more funding to those projects? What will the government do about UNRWA funding?
It's unrealistic to think Australia can make up the difference. We can only do what Australia can do. Australia is not a great and global power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Minister, Donald Trump's USAID funding freeze, stop work order alongside the global gag order and stopping UNRF funding is, of course, a callous political attack on the international human rights, which will cost lives, inflict suffering, result in the closure of vital health and gender equity programs in the global South. And it will be a catastrophic blow for the Pacific And Southeast Asia and Gaza. I read this morning that the minister has tasked the department to review all projects in the Pacific And Southeast Asia funded by US foreign aid that has been frozen by Donald Trump. Minister, have you also spoken to your counterpart in The US about the impacts of freezing aid and urge them to reverse this terrible decision?
Speaker 1: Senator, in relation to the decisions of the Trump administration to pause or freeze and review, and I'd make just emphasize that we're obviously in a process of review. I personally have not yet engaged with Secretary Rubio on those matters. Obviously, there is a pause in place.
Speaker 0: So I was asking not about The US review. I know it's a ninety day freeze. I was asking about the department's review that the minister has tasked you with, looking at projects which will be impacted. When is that review going to be completed?
Speaker 2: So, I think, senator, we we've already, done an initial assessment on those implications. And then, obviously, once the, ninety days is over from The US
Speaker 0: Ninety days, a lot of damage would be done, minister. What I I have been hearing from aid organizations is that it will have a disastrous impact on many things. So is the government if you have looked at the projects that are being are being impacted, is the government going to step up, add more funding to those projects? What is the government going to do about UNRWA funding as well?
Speaker 1: It's unrealistic to think that a country of Australia's size could make up the difference in some of the
Speaker 0: You could step up well.
Speaker 1: Just Senator, let me finish. It's unrealistic to think that. And we can shake your head, but there are a lot of claims on the budget, but Australia can do what Australia can do, and we will do that. But Australia can't do what Australia can't Australia is not a great and global power.
@WVfunnyguy - YourFavWestVirginian
😱 omg ! You have to watch this! This dude was funny and I’m not sure he meant to be! https://t.co/koVcCcFlN0
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the practice of news anchors exaggerating Hispanic accents when pronouncing Hispanic names, regardless of the anchor's ethnicity. They contrast this with the pronunciation of Irish names, where no similar accent shift occurs. The speaker uses the example of Alejandro Mayorkas, whose name they claim is pronounced differently on CNN. The speaker believes this phenomenon, along with other unspecified reasons, led to the election of Donald Trump in 2016 and will lead to his reelection in 2024.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every time we hear a Hispanic name on TV, whether or not the anchor is Hispanic, we suddenly have to shape shift into a perfect Hispanic accent. Police arrested 25 year old Ilan Alain Sanchez. And I mean that honestly. Why do we do that? When I say Alejandro Mayorkas, I just say Alejandro Mayorkas.
But on CNN, it's Alejandro Mayorkas. I'm Irish. When police arrest someone with an Irish name, I don't say police just arrested 25 year old Charlie McLaughlin. I just say police arrested Charlie McLaughlin. Like, stop that.
Stop. And it's for all of these reasons and everything that I just mentioned, that America elected Donald Trump in 2016 and then elected Donald Trump again in 2024.
@WVfunnyguy - YourFavWestVirginian
It’s true tho 😂
@DavidJHarrisJr - David J Harris Jr
You can’t make this stuff up 🤣 https://t.co/FRgG80kTJC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims most people in the country voted for Trump and that he won the popular vote. Speaker 1 disputes this, stating it was a slim majority of voters and that too few people voted. Speaker 0 says those who cared about issues voted for Trump to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Speaker 1 counters that lots of voters were purged from voter rolls before the election. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of election denial. Speaker 1 accuses the "narcissist in that building" of gaslighting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most people in this country voted for Trump.
Speaker 1: It's a lie. The slim majority of voters we are shamefully, were very few voters who showed up, but stop that bullshit. It is not a majority. It's not a lie.
Speaker 0: This bullshit is
Speaker 1: a lie.
Speaker 0: He actually won the popular vote.
Speaker 1: I am telling you, it was a slim majority of voters. Are you hearing me? Because I can sign a people on a vote. That is why you're not supposed to spread the bullshit that all most Americans are looking for this because
Speaker 0: Well, people care, then they vote.
Speaker 1: Enough because too few people voted. That's a disgraceful
Speaker 0: care about issues, then they vote.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well If you wanna
Speaker 0: The ones who cared voted for Trump to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in government.
Speaker 1: Because lots of voters were purged from voter rolls before the election.
Speaker 0: This sounds familiar to me. It sounds like election denial. Is that what you guys are doing?
Speaker 1: Just stop.
Speaker 0: I'm just because I thought we weren't supposed to do that.
Speaker 1: Just stop.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So I I just I'm just you just told me that. You just said this. Right?
Speaker 1: You know, the damage that is being done by the narcissist in that building, the people who believe his bullshit. I know gaslighting when I see it and when I hear it. So just stop.
Speaker 0: Okay. Stop. You don't have to talk to me. I'm I'm actually on my way over here. So
@OgWolf55 - Old School Classics aka Turk 🎸🎼🇺🇸
What he said. 👇 https://t.co/O9L4fpaKpt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The chaos in Los Angeles is not organic or random, but a calculated move by the leftist ruling class to protect census-based political control. House seats and electoral votes are based on the number of people counted in a state, including illegal aliens. The influx of over 10,000,000 people across the border into blue states like New York and California is about math, not compassion.
Mass deportations and people fleeing these blue states are threatening the math. For every 740,000 illegal aliens deported from a blue state, they lose one congressional seat in 2030. The DNC doesn't just lose votes, they lose control. Burning a city down like LA is a means to stop Trump. Media hysteria is used to stop deportations, and state-level obstruction protects population counts. Protests and riots are designed to bait the feds and flip the narrative. This is about control, power, and political survival, with the census as the real battlefield.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So do you wanna know what all this craziness in LA is really about? The riots, the organized protests, and the current chaos unfolding in the sanctuary city known as Los Angeles? Well, it's not organic, and it's definitely not random. It's actually a calculated move by the leftist ruling class to protect the one thing, the one thing that keeps them in power. Census based political control.
You see, house seats and electoral votes aren't based on how many citizens live in a state, just how many people are counted in that state, and that includes illegal aliens. They are counted as well. So when over 10,000,000 plus flood across the border into blue states like New York and California over the last four years, it's not about compassion, it's about math. More bodies equals more power in congress. But now, mass deportations and people fleeing these blue states are threatening the math.
For every 740,000 illegal aliens that are deported from a blue state is one congressional seat in 2030. And if that trend continues, the DNC just just doesn't lose votes. They lose control and likely for good. This is why they would burn a city down like LA to stop Trump. This is why we're seeing the panic.
Media hysteria to stop deportations. State level obstruction to protect population counts. Protests and riots like we're seeing in LA designed to bait the feds and flip the narrative. This was never about human rights or compassion. They don't care about you.
They don't care about your safety. They only care about control and power. It's political survival, and the census is the real battlefield. Let me know what you think in the comments and hit that
@QuantumAlteredX - Invisidon
Someone gave the go ahead for this man to tell some raw truths https://t.co/JRVZpbiX7b
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers believe the system is rigged, pointing to consistent foreign and economic policies regardless of who's elected, and the secrecy surrounding the Epstein videos. They suspect Epstein's operation was a blackmail scheme run by intelligence agencies to control powerful individuals.
They question why those caught in the scheme don't expose it, suggesting deep implication or repeat offenses. One speaker believes every US president faces implicit threats, referencing JFK's assassination and the continued withholding of files. They cite Nixon's fear when discussing Kennedy with the CIA director as evidence of the power these forces hold, implying a clear message to stay within certain boundaries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I feel like an idiot for being shocked because, of course, it's not a democracy. Of course, the system is rigged. It's fake. Because no matter who gets elected, you get the same foreign policy, you get the same economic policy, and the Epstein videos remain secret. So, like, that just shows you that our system has no effect on the actual system.
Speaker 1: Wait. What are you talking about? I thought we could all sleep well at night now knowing that Epstein legitimately Right? I've dug into that, and it's just so spooky what's going on with that. I mean, how do you charge a guy with trafficking when there are no end users that have been charged?
Who did you traffic to?
Speaker 0: I don't know. You got me on that one.
Speaker 1: I mean, right? How do how do you charge him with that if there's no if that's where the trail starts, where does it end with? I I think there's just a lot more going on than the majority of people know about. What do you think that was? What do I think it was?
Yeah. I think it was a blackmail operation. What do you think it was?
Speaker 0: I think it was a blackmail operation run by the CIA and the Israeli intel services and and probably others. You know, French intelligence always has a hand in everything I've noticed, so probably them too. The usual,
Speaker 1: you know, darkest forces in
Speaker 0: the world colluding to make rich and powerful people obey their agenda.
Speaker 1: I don't understand why nobody has come out on it. Nobody has come out on it. Right? I mean, because if you paint the scenario, you get on a jet, maybe you're totally innocent. You don't know what's going on.
Two hot women come out of the whatever sewer this place come out and one thing leads to another. Yes. And then and then what They go, oh, we got you. You're on camera. And by the way, these girls are teen or teen or whatever the hell they were.
Right? And, yes, for a married guy, it's pretty up that you're doing that. But, I mean, it's nothing nothing new under the sun. So why wouldn't you just scream blackmail at the top of your lungs like, didn't know this is what happened and just come clean on it? Why do you think?
Because they're repeat customers.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Because they're so deeply implicated that they can't actually get out of it. Yeah. Maybe not. I don't know.
I mean, there's also it's not just blackmail that makes people obey. It's not just bribery. It's also the threat of
Speaker 1: Do you know anybody that's been threatened with
Speaker 0: I think every US president has been threatened with implicitly because of or of John f Kennedy. I've known a bunch of presidents. I think every
Speaker 1: one of them understands that, you
Speaker 0: know, it's pretty obvious what happened there, and no one has, in to this day, released all the files. And, like, why is that? Because the message is really clear. You know, if you get too far outside the boundaries, like, you could wind up like JFK. Who places the boundaries?
Probably the same forces sitting president in 1963. If you listen to the tape of Richard Nixon talking to the CIA director in the Oval Office, when he brings up Kennedy's he's the president. In fact, not only is he the president, he got he's won by the biggest landslide in American history. Has a real mandate, and he is afraid. He's afraid even to talk in private to the CIA director about what that was, and he indicates, like, I know what happened to Jack Kennedy, and the CIA director doesn't even respond.
And the president doesn't have the balls to say, hey, son. I'm talking to you. You work for me. Like, I want I want the files on this. Mhmm.
Like, I knew Jack Kennedy. He was pretty in the head next to his wife in public like a man. Mhmm. I wanna know what happened here. He does not have the balls to say that to his own CI director.
Man. That's the level of fear that a like that that's officially unsolved, but, you know, whose outline everyone really a lot of
Speaker 1: people understand. Like, that's the
Speaker 0: fear that that inculcates.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
Unbelievable 🤦🏻♂️ https://t.co/JYo19yyExx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The CDC has an $11.5 billion budget, with almost $5 billion allocated to purchasing and promoting vaccines and only $20 million to studying vaccine safety. The CDC effectively functions as a vaccine company, owning 56 vaccine patents. Scientists at the FDA and CDC can receive up to $150,000 annually in royalties from vaccines they develop.
The former CDC director from 2002-2009, Julie Gerberding, who oversaw many vaccine studies later deemed unreliable, became president of Merck's vaccine division in 2010, with an estimated $2.5 million salary and stock options. After HHS licenses, recommends, and promotes vaccines, it defends against claims that vaccines cause harm. As the defendant in vaccine court cases, HHS has an incentive to suppress studies showing vaccine unsafety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CDC has an $11,500,000,000 budget. And look. Almost 5,000,000,000 of that is allocated to purchase and promote vaccines and only 20,000,000 to study vaccine safety. That pays for a couple of studies. CDC effectively is a vaccine company.
It owns 56 vaccine patents. The scientists who work for FDA and the CDC can receive royalties of a $150,000 a year on vaccines that they develop. So this is the last agency that ought to be regulating vaccines, and yet we are trusting this agency with the health of our children. Here's an example of the revolving door at CDC. The former CDC director from 2002 to 02/2009, when many of these vaccines were approved and many of these studies, these phony studies were being formulated was Julie Gerberding.
She oversaw numerous vaccine studies, many of which were recently deemed unreliable by IOM. And in 2010, she became, a year after leaving CDC, she was rewarded, let's say, with the presidency of Merck's vaccine division, which with an estimated 2,500,000.0 in annual salary and lucrative stock options. Here is another unspoken conflict within HHS. After HHS licenses, recommends and promotes vaccines with virtually no safety data, HHS is then statutorily required and vigorously defends against any claimant that vaccines cause harm. The vaccine act says in all proceedings brought by filing a petition in vaccine court, the secretary of HHS is named as the defendant.
So the HHS, because it's defending vaccine injury cases, has a built in incentive rather than studying vaccines for safety to kill any studies that may show that a vaccine is unsafe. And this isn't just theoretical. This actually happens in real life.
@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser
Wait, did he actually just say that live on air? https://t.co/NmqIfbQzA1
Video Transcript AI Summary
The weather system is picking up speed and will move to the metro between 6 and 7 PM this evening. The large area of blue on the radar is military chaff released by the military, originating near Fort Sill and moving north and east. A cold front is also present. Lighting the Cherokee trucks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stop. It's picked up speed, folks. This will move to the metro between six and 07:00 this evening. And I also wanna point out this big area of blue, that's what we call military chaff, and the military releases some things in the atmosphere. I know.
Down near Fort Sill, that's been riding north and east, and the radar is picking that up right there. And then look at the cold front there. Lighting the Cherokee trucks