TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

TPostMillennial
Posted - September 14, 2022 at 11:27 PM
Saved - July 7, 2025 at 5:34 AM

@TPostMillennial - The Post Millennial

Dan Bongino @dbongino rips into the Biden admin's push for electric vehicles. https://t.co/5wzFZpLqvQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims electric cars are a "con," citing John Kerry's private jet usage. A Jay Leno clip with Joe Biden was filmed at the Secret Service Training Center, where the speaker used to work, suggesting the whole thing is a "schtick." According to an op-ed, there's only enough battery power to power the world for 75 seconds. The speaker analogizes this to a hospital patient on life support. By 2030, the plan is to have enough battery power for only eleven minutes. The speaker believes "liberals" are asking for a solution that doesn't exist. The other speaker agrees, stating that the plan is not well thought out.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dan, I don't even know anybody with an electric car. The only people I saw with an electric car, they're worth, like, $25,000,000, and it's their fourth car. Do you know anybody like that? Speaker 1: No. I don't have one. But, you know, they could be helpful, like, down here in Florida if there's, like, a hurricane or something that tends to be lines at the gas station. So if my wife wanted to take the kid to school and they have a spare $100,000, it's like a big glorified golf cart. But let me show you what you had that little graphic on the screen there about the con. This is all a con. You got John Kerry, the climate czar, zipping around the world in a private jet, basically pissing out carbon dioxide all over The United States and the world all over the place because that's what they do. But something happened in that video. I bet you didn't even know. You see that Jay Leno clip with Joe Biden there? You wanna see how much of a con this is? I'm gonna let you in a little secret. I noticed watching this. I was watching you know, I watch the show as I'm doing. I watch a I'm a guest, but I'm still checking it out. Right. Because I like your show. I go to bed at, eight, and sometimes the last thing I see. That Joe Biden Jay Lenno clip was at the Secret Service Training Center. That look. Oh, look at the background. That's the Secret Service I was a transportation section instructor. That's the driving pad. That whole thing's a schtick too. Look. Thank you, producers. That that's the that's the James J. Rowley Training Center. Yep. That those are the secret service training vehicles in the background. I used to train people on myself. The whole thing's a scam. Now a couple more points on this scam, though, too, to put some meat on the bone. There's a Beyond Lumbbourg op ed in The Wall Street Journal about this green car scam and all this great did you read this? It's so good. He says, listen. There's enough battery power in the world right now, Jesse. Battery power right now to power the world for guess how long. Take a stab at it. Here's the answer. Seventy five seconds. Seventy five seconds. So think about this. Because the liberals are really slow when they're watching the show. You wanna transition to a green future that doesn't exist. You're going to the bullpen for the righty. There's no righty in the bullpen. So if I were to say to you, listen. Your your your girlfriend or wife, god forbid, is on life support in the hospital, gonna turn out the power to the hospital, but don't worry. We have enough battery power for seventy five seconds. You'll be like, you're gonna kill her. That is exactly the Biden energy plan right now. You're going to a backup plan that doesn't exist. Speaker 0: And and the plan is probably gonna take five centuries because if it took a year for them to spend point 01% of the trillion dollars that we gave them on four projects, sidewalks in New Hampshire? Is that what we were clamoring for in the infrastructure? They they put a they put a Chick fil A at Logan Airport in in Terminal E. They they fixed a dock and built a bridge, Dan. When are we getting to the real stuff? Speaker 1: Well, the I'm a big fan of Chick fil A, so I may have to throw the red flag and go into the hood and review for that one. But the other ones, you're good with. The heated sidewalk in New Hampshire, hard pass. But here's the thing. No. You're right. Like, even the plan they have for the future because you may say the Liberals watching your show foaming at the mouth and, you know, wetting their diapers right now. They're probably like, oh, Bongino's crazy. So what? We have 75 of battery power to power the world. Right. We have a plan for the future. In that same op ed by Beyond Lundberg, he says that their plan says that by 2030 I just read it before I came on the air. By 2030, don't worry, Jesse. In eight years, we'll have enough battery power for eleven minutes. Yes. So then we're really good. Yes. Yes. That's right. We are all set, brother. Set. You it'll be eleven minutes of glory. You'll get a few trailers on Netflix before the whole power system goes out, and we're all in the dark dying. I have people I I mean, it's just it's so you can't talk sense into these people. They are. Asking you to go get the righty out of the bullpen, and there's nobody in the freaking bullpen, dude. There's nobody there. Speaker 0: And they're making it up as they go along. They haven't thought this through. Speaker 1: It's it's it's it's Speaker 0: pretty clear. Alright. Dan Bongino, I know it's getting to your bedtime, so I'm gonna say goodbye. Thanks for joining Speaker 1: us as always. Speaker 0: Got it. Out on the weekends.
TheKevinDalton
Posted - June 8, 2023 at 12:58 PM
Saved - June 9, 2023 at 10:35 PM

@TheKevinDalton - Kevin Dalton

Don't let Gavin Newsom Californiaize the rest of the country https://t.co/IXrsAfxdeB

Video Transcript AI Summary
As governor, I promise to lead California through any challenges in the California way, with compassion and common sense. It's a mistake to be sober all the time; we all need to self-medicate occasionally. We must value diversity, tell the truth, follow science, and protect our planet. Gavin Newsom embodies courage in times of crisis.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As your governor, I promise you, whatever challenges come our way, I will always lead the California way. You, really insane. I say that's the California way. Thank you so much. Based on compassion Speaker 1: I mean, if we're gonna be realistic, they pay you to be homeless here. Speaker 0: Common sense. And sober is one of the biggest damn mistakes this country's ever made. We all need to self medicate periodically. Telling the truth. Telling the truth, treasuring our diversity. Is the fist to hit my Telling the truth, following science, Protecting our planet. Gavin Newsom, courage through crisis.
WesleyHuntTX
Posted - September 8, 2023 at 4:55 PM
Saved - September 9, 2023 at 1:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Biden's commitment to ending fossil fuels is evident, despite the unpopularity of his energy and economic policies. The administration's disregard for public opinion reflects a determined pursuit of their goals, even if it means sacrificing the country's well-being. Managed decline and forced behavior are now the norm.

@WesleyHuntTX - Wesley Hunt

Biden is making good on his promise to eliminate fossil fuels. His policies on energy and the economy are the most unpopular on record, but the Biden Admin does NOT care what you think. This is what forced behavior and managed decline look like. The Biden Administration will destroy the country to achieve their goals.

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden has cut the last oil and gas leases in Alaska's Arctic refuge, overturning previous approvals by former President Trump. The White House claims this decision is aimed at protecting the environment and returning the land to indigenous communities. However, critics argue that it limits economic potential and hampers infrastructure development, which is crucial for the North Slope borough and its eight communities. They emphasize the importance of resource development in supporting their way of life, culture, and future. Without an economy, communities and cultures cannot thrive.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oil prices are on track for another weekly gain, and gas here at home is averaging 3.80 per gallon, but that didn't stop president Biden from cutting the last oil and gas leases in Alaska's, in Alaska's Arctic refuge overturning 7 sales approved by former president Trump. The White House says the decision was made to save the environment and give the land back to the indigenous communities who live there. Speaker 1: It just it shrinks our economic potential on the North Slope. The North Slope borough, which provides for all of the 8 communities that are on the North Slope. Water and sewer school education, they rely on the taxes that they get from the infrastructure development. And without the potential To, develop these resources, it limits the pot that they're able to generate revenue from. Speaker 0: And I'd love to get your response to what the president said. This will help preserve our lands and wildlife while honoring the culture, history, and enduring wisdom of Alaska native. Speaker 1: Over the last 50 years, we've been coexisting thing with resource development. We've adapted to this new, style of economy. We've it it has enhanced our subsistence way of life, but it also requires, an economy and jobs and things to be able to support your family, to be able to buy ATVs, snowmobiles, boats, and things that are required nowadays to subsist. So moving forward, in order to protect our culture, to protect our people, we need access to these resources, to these jobs, to this economy to really protect Our our cultural future. Without an economy, we don't have communities. Without communities, we don't have our cultures.
Travis_in_Flint
Posted - September 11, 2023 at 9:51 PM
Saved - September 12, 2023 at 1:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The administration's recent actions border on satire. Energy Secretary Granholm's electric vehicle road trip hit a snag due to a lack of charging stations. Her staff, in gas cars, blocked electric vehicles from accessing the stations, prompting a police intervention. This absurdity begs the question: Why support such nonsense?

@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

This entire administration is absolute satire at this point. Apparently energy secretary Jennifer Granholm went on a road trip tour in an electric vehicle to prove how great electric vehicles are. They ran into trouble almost immediately as they found not enough charging stations. She sent her staff ahead with a gas car and had them reserve a spot for her at the electric stations. A family ended up calling the police because her staff was using gas cars to block electric vehicles from using the stations. Why would anyone vote for this nonsense at this point?

RepThomasMassie
Posted - November 8, 2023 at 1:56 AM
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 2:16 AM

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

The right to travel is fundamental, but the government has mandated a kill-switch in new vehicles sold after 2026. The kill-switch will monitor driver performance and disable cars based on the information gathered. We will vote on my amendment to defund this mandate tonight. https://t.co/Uf0Z2yVNP1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces an amendment to defund a federal mandate requiring all new vehicles after 2026 to be equipped with a kill switch that can disable a vehicle if the driver is deemed to be performing poorly. The speaker argues that this mandate infringes on the fundamental right to travel freely. The opposition claims that the amendment is misleading, as the mandate does not require kill switches but rather passive technology to prevent drunk driving. They argue that this technology saves lives and reduces the burden on police officers. The speaker counters by expressing concerns about privacy, potential dangers, and the violation of constitutional rights.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is now in order to consider amendment number 60, printed in part B of house report 118dash261. For what purpose does the gentleman from Kentucky seek recognition? Speaker 1: Mister chair, I have an amendment at the desk. Speaker 0: The clerk will designate the amendment. Speaker 2: Amendment number 60 printed in part B of house report number 118 dash 261, Offered by mister Massey of Kentucky. Speaker 0: Pursuant to House Resolution 838, the gentleman from Kentucky, mister Massey, A and a member opposed. Each will control 5 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from Kentucky. Speaker 1: Mister chair, I rise in support of my amendment which states None of the funds made available by this act may use be used to implement section 24220 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. My amendment is simple. It will defund the federal mandate that requires all new vehicles after 2026 Be equipped with a kill switch that can disable a vehicle if the vehicle has monitored the users, the driver's performance, And that the vehicle determines that the driver is not performing well. It's so incredible that I have to offer this amendment. It almost sounds like The domain of science fiction, dystopian science fiction, that the federal government would put a kill switch in vehicles that would be the judge, The jury and the executioner on such a fundamental right as the right to travel freely. But here we are. It is it is federal law that this is mandated, and so I am offering this amendment to defund this mandate. And with that, I reserve the balance of my time. Speaker 0: The gentleman reserves, for what purpose does the gentleman from Illinois seek recognition? Speaker 3: Mr. Chairman, I claim time in opposition. Speaker 0: The gentleman is recognized. Speaker 3: Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Florida, the ranking member of the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs subcommittee, Miss Wasserman Schultz. Speaker 0: The gentlewoman is recognized. Speaker 4: I thank the gentleman for yielding. I actually need 2 minutes if that's possible, mister chairman. Speaker 3: We'll do 2 minutes, Mr. Chairman. Speaker 0: Thank you. The gentlewoman is recognized. Speaker 4: Thank you very much. Lobbying in mid, in mid sentence. I rise in opposition to this amendment. Let me be clear. This the act that the gentleman is trying to defund does not Require auto manufacturers to install kill switches. It does not do that. Passive drunk driving technology is a vital tool in safeguarding our loved ones and other innocent people on our roads. This new technology offers a lifeline of hope to not only save lives, But to prevent the lifelong emotional toll and gargantuan costs these accidents inflict on families. Deadly drunk driving accidents can echo across generations. But we can seize this opportunity to stop such tragedies. Between 2019 and 2021, Florida saw a 31% increase in drunk driving crashes. In mister Massey's home state of Kentucky, 190 people were killed in drunk driving crashes in 2021 alone. That was a 26% increase. When we saw these grim statistics, we acted in a bipartisan fashion in Congress. And how often do we see that? Both Republicans and Democrats supported the HALT Act to require auto manufacturers to make this passive Technology standard in new vehicles. The sponsor of this Muscadet amendment will tell you that he worries about privacy concerns. We heard the same inane calls with seat belt requirements, but you don't have a right to engage in potentially fatal behavior that we know poses a major health threat to public safety. Passive drunk driving technology is pro police. This anti drunk driving technology lightens the load on police officers, allowing them to focus on more pressing safety concerns. The importance of this technology goes far beyond statistics. It's about saving lives, preventing heartbreak, and making our roads safer. It's a passionate call to action to prevent alcohol impaired driving from shattering the lives of those we hold dear. This amendment, I understand, was dubbed the kill switch amendment, And it does not require a kill switch. It simply allow it simply requires passive technology to help us prevent drunk driving. In the name of the 406 people who that were killed by a drunk driver in my own state of Florida last year alone, I urge my colleagues to vote no on this amendment. Let's take steps to reduce deaths due to drunk driving, not increase them. Thank you. I yield back the balance of my time. Speaker 0: Gentlemen reserves. Gentlemen from Kentucky is recognized. Speaker 1: Drunk driving is a serious problem. That's why 31 states already have a law to implement interlock ignition technology, Where if you've been convicted of a DUI, that you have to pass this test in order to operate your vehicle. But this federal law That I seek to defend goes far beyond that, and I regret that I have to spend some of my time reading the law to the other side of the aisle, but I will do that. This law that was passed in a 1,000 page bill 2 years ago requires that automobiles can passively monitor the performance Of a driver. Not the blood alcohol content, but the performance of a driver, of a motor vehicle, to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired, Not drunk. It says impaired. And prevent or limit motor vehicle operation. That's a kill switch. Now the question is, how much time do you have once your dashboard tells you that it doesn't approve of your driving? What if you're a single mother, And you're out in bad weather, and you're trying to avoid some obstacles, ice perhaps, and you swerved 3 times, and your dashboard says, Swerve one more time and you're going to be put over to the side of the road, that you'll have a 100 yards to park this vehicle in the middle of nowhere with your children in In the back seat. This isn't some fantastical scenario. This is what will happen if this is implemented. And this is the law. I have read it to you here. Now, you maybe should have read it 2 years ago when you all voted for it on that side of the aisle, But it wasn't a bill that was 1039 pages long. So I I can understand how you don't know what the law has in it. But I've read it to you. And with that, I reserve the balance of my time. Speaker 0: The member is reminded to direct his remarks to the chair. The gentleman from Illinois is recognized. Speaker 3: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I yield 1 minute to the generalwoman from Illinois, Ms. Schakowsky. Speaker 0: The generalwoman is recognized. Speaker 5: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. More than 10,000 people die every year from drunk driving crashes. Drunk drivers are 7 times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash than a sober person. So you would think that the republicans would wanna do something about it. Democrats have done something about it and said that NHTSA now Will have drunk driver pro prevention technology. You know, this, this technology Has the potential of saving thousands of lives. And I don't see that you're agreeing that we Should, be saving those lives and I would say we should all vote against the drunk driver protection act. And I yield back. Speaker 0: The gentleman reserves his time. The gentleman the gentleman from Kentucky is recognized. Speaker 3: May I Speaker 1: inquire as to how much time I have remaining? Speaker 0: And has 2 minutes remaining. Speaker 1: Well, we actually don't know how this technology is going to work and they don't know over at the DOT either because We've sent a letter to them that they haven't responded to yet, asking them, will this have cameras inside the car? Will it monitor your eyes To see if you're focused on the road. Will it have cameras on the outside of the car? How will it know what your performance is relative to the road that you're driving on If it doesn't, in fact, know which road you're driving on, will it need to know where you are when you are driving? If so, who has access to this data? Who has access Speaker 0: to those Speaker 1: cameras? Will the 4th Amendment be followed? Will you require a warrant For your insurance company to access this data, will you require a warrant for the government to access this data? Once your car's been disabled and now you're on the side of the road with Your children in it for reasons you don't understand. How long until the police show up? Or what if you truly are disabled And you're over to the side of the road. Does anybody show up? How long do you have to get out of the vehicle? Who decides when your vehicle Killswitch is disabled and you get to drive again. Who's gonna adjudicate that on the side of the road? What if it's rush hour traffic? What if you know you've already got points against you according to your dashboard and it's monitored your performance, and now there's somebody's pet in the road? Do you swerve to miss it and get your car disabled. What if there's an emergency vehicle approaching from behind you and you know the right thing is to swerve off the road and let that vehicle pass? What after you've done that 3 times? And now your car says, Do it one more time and we're going to leave you on the side of the road. This is end of law. This will become law in 2026, every vehicle manufactured after that. And it's not about drunk driving. If it were, it would just be about blood alcohol content. That this law has far more than that in it. It violates the 4th Amendment. It violates so many amendments. It violates things that are so fundamental to our rights. They're not even in the Constitution, like the right to travel. And so I urge support of this amendment that will defund the law that was passed 2 years ago that the other side of the aisle doesn't even know exists. And I yield back.
RepThomasMassie
Posted - November 8, 2023 at 5:20 AM
Saved - November 8, 2023 at 3:37 PM

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

🚨 The federal government has mandated that all vehicles sold after 2026 must have a kill switch that can disable your vehicle based on your driving performance. My amendment to defund that unconstitutional mandate failed tonight. Here is the roll call: https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2023/roll616.xml

CHRISsW0RLD
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 9:08 PM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 8:45 PM

@CHRISsW0RLD - CHRIS’W0RLD

Got an EV to save some gas money?! THINK AGAIN!!! Biden administration SUDDENLY realizes they won’t make enough money from taxes on gasoline from EV owners. Their solution…. simply add a new tax on EV owners to make up the difference! You can’t make this up! 🤣😂🤣😂 https://t.co/DX1ZyO24GD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden's push for electric vehicles has resulted in auto workers losing their jobs and car dealerships struggling to sell unwanted EVs. Despite the lack of demand, those who do buy electric vehicles to save on gas are now being targeted by the government for more revenue. This includes placing tracking devices on their cars to monitor their usage. It's frustrating how liberals can support such policies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: State squeeze money out of electric vehicle owners to replace lost gas tax revenue. So just to be clear, Biden and his team put auto workers out of work by pushing the production of electric vehicles nobody wants. The vehicles then sit on the lot, putting a bunch of car dealerships probably out of business as they sit on product no one wants, and then the few people that buy them because they don't pay gas, bills, because they're not filling up their car with gas because it's electric, the government feels it's entitled to more of your revenue, so they figure they gotta squeeze more money out of you and put, like, some beacon on your car because they're not getting gas money after pushing you to get an electric vehicle so you could save on gas and gas it it's unbelievable. How you could vote for freaking Liberals, it is just phenomenal.
ryangerritsen
Posted - December 9, 2023 at 2:32 PM
Saved - December 10, 2023 at 1:38 PM

@ryangerritsen - Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

Our Government forcing Canadians to drive electric will result in our economy being brought down to its knees. People will freeze to death waiting for their cars to be towed. You can’t just push an electric car off the road, they need a flatbed. This Government is insane. https://t.co/fwKr1xkBpk

BrendanCarrFCC
Posted - December 12, 2023 at 10:08 PM
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 8:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Federal agencies, including the FCC, are engaging in regulatory actions against Elon Musk after President Biden gave them the go-ahead. This follows previous actions taken by the DOJ, FAA, FTC, NLRB, SDNY, and FWS. President Biden has expressed interest in investigating Musk's activities.

@BrendanCarrFCC - Brendan Carr

Last year, after Elon Musk acquired Twitter, President Biden gave federal agencies the green light to go after him. And they have. Today, the FCC adds itself to the growing list of federal agencies engaging in the regulatory harassment of Elon Musk. I dissent. https://t.co/1zEoGCwiNk

@BrendanCarrFCC - Brendan Carr

President Biden stood at a White House podium & stated that Elon Musk “is worth being looked at.” When asked "How?", President Biden responded “There’s a lot of ways.” There certainly are. The DOJ, FAA, FTC, NLRB, SDNY, & FWS have all taken action. The FCC now joins them.

Derricktgoat
Posted - December 17, 2023 at 1:11 PM
Saved - December 17, 2023 at 4:11 PM

@Derricktgoat - Nick Leaf

TRUDEAU will FORCE Canadians to buy an Electric Car by 2035. ⁦@JustinTrudeau⁩ and ⁦⁦@s_guilbeault⁩ tell automakers not to make gasoline powered cars after 2035. So much for free market in Canada #trudeaumustgo https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/electric-vehicle-ev-guilbeault-1.7061381

Ottawa expected to release promised EV sales regulations Tuesday | CBC News CBC News has learned that automakers are expected to get a jolt Tuesday when the federal government unveils its promised electric vehicle (EV) regulations. cbc.ca
BelannF
Posted - March 30, 2024 at 2:14 PM
Saved - March 31, 2024 at 2:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A Texas judge has struck down Biden's gas emissions rule, stating that the administration lacked authority under the law to impose it. This ruling is seen as another attempt to make fossil fuel cars unaffordable due to cost.

@BelannF - BelannF

TEXAS JUDGE STRIKES DOWN BIDEN'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL EFFORTS TO IMPOSE GAS EMISSIONS RULE - Of course Biden will pay no attention to the ruling - We are being ruled not governed by these Globalist fanatics. Yes - Biden’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rule for Vehicles Struck Down by Texas Judge Judge James Hendrix said the Biden administration lacked authority under law to impose the gas emissions rule. In his ruling, Judge James Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas agreed, stating that the Biden administration lacked authority under law to impose the greenhouse gas emissions performance measure. This is one more effort to try to make fossil fuel cars unattainable because of cost. https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/bidens-greenhouse-gas-emissions-rule-for-vehicles-struck-down-by-texas-judge-5617804

Biden’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rule for Vehicles Struck Down by Texas Judge Judge James Hendrix said the Biden administration lacked authority under law to impose the gas emissions rule. theepochtimes.com
CollinRugg
Posted - October 27, 2024 at 11:12 PM
Saved - October 28, 2024 at 1:45 AM

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

JUST IN: Elon Musk rips the federal government, says the Department Of Government Efficiency will get them "off your back and out of your pocketbook." "America is going to reach heights that it has never seen before." 🔥🔥 https://t.co/Nj9PeD61s8

Video Transcript AI Summary
All government spending is taxation, either directly or through inflation. The Department of Government Efficiency will address wasted money. The goal is to get the government out of people's pocketbooks, leading America to unprecedented heights and an amazing future. The speaker expresses enthusiasm for the positive energy present.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, at the end of the day, you're being taxed. You're being taxed. All government spending is taxation. So whether it's it's direct taxation or all government spending, it's either becomes inflation or it's it's direct taxation. Your money is being wasted, and the Department of Government Efficiency is gonna fix that. We're gonna get the government off your back and out of your pocketbook. And America is just not not just gonna be great. America is gonna reach heights that it has never seen before. The future is gonna be amazing. Now you guys are awesome. Honestly, this is like What? Honestly, this is like yeah. I mean, this is this is, like, this is the kind of positive energy that America is all about.
elonmusk
Posted - December 6, 2024 at 1:50 AM
Saved - December 6, 2024 at 3:40 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

This needs to be fixed. Should be rule by democracy, not rule by bureaucracy!

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

🧵1. In a meeting today with @elonmusk, @vivekgramaswamy, & @speakerjohnson, Elon & Vivek referred to the fact that, because unelected bureaucrats now make most federal law & control much of our economy, we’ve been stripped of the benefits of a constitutional republic. https://t.co/8Zo3DoilrB

DogRightGirl
Posted - December 19, 2024 at 4:13 PM
Saved - December 19, 2024 at 8:27 PM

@DogRightGirl - Spitfire

I CANT BELIEVE @elonmusk HAS ANY INFLUENCE ON POLITICIANS!!!!!! How DARE he!! https://t.co/iaL6NpbdmE

RepEliCrane
Posted - February 15, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Saved - February 16, 2025 at 12:32 AM

@RepEliCrane - Rep. Eli Crane

I’m one of them. Activist judges are out of control.

@LeadingReport - Leading Report

BREAKING: Several House Republicans are preparing articles of impeachment against the federal judges blocking some of President Trump’s and Elon Musk’s key policies.

SenJohnKennedy
Posted - February 25, 2025 at 11:52 PM
Saved - February 26, 2025 at 1:03 PM

@SenJohnKennedy - John Kennedy

The Biden admin issued a foolish rule that hurts our energy industry and increases prices for Americans.   Today, the Senate passed my resolution to kill this anti-common sense regulation. https://t.co/uszblYiG82

Video Transcript AI Summary
As the Biden administration ends, a new rule requires renewed surveys for well and pipeline drilling, raising drilling costs. These increased costs inevitably get passed on to consumers, hindering our efforts to lower prices. This regulation exemplifies a key reason for the inflation we're currently facing in America. My resolution aims to rescind this rule. While I won't comment on the originator's intelligence, I will say that we must eliminate this detrimental policy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the waning days of the Biden administration, BOEM promulgated a new rule that says if you wanna drill a well or build a pipeline, you gotta survey it again. This, of course, increases the cost of drilling, which, of course, increases the cost of energy because the extra cost is passed on to the consumer, which, of course, hurts us in our fight to lower prices. This this regulation is just one example of why we are experiencing inflation in America today. My resolution would rescind this rule. I'm not I'm not saying that the guy who came up with this idea of this rule is the dumbest person in the world, but I am saying that the guy who came up with this idea for this rule better hope that the dumbest person in the world doesn't die, and we're gonna kill it.
SenJoniErnst
Posted - March 10, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Saved - March 11, 2025 at 3:18 PM

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

Biden's $3 billion EV fleet for @USPS is lost in the mail! ✉️   Just 93 of 50,000 vehicles have been delivered.   I am canceling the order and returning the unspent money to sender: the taxpayers!

@FoxNews - Fox News

DOGE lawmakers look to defund Biden's anemic-paced $3B EV postal truck 'boondoggle' https://trib.al/Xl2uY8C

SocialFlow trib.al
SenJoniErnst
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 8:54 PM

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

President Biden's $3 billion for a @USPS EV fleet is lost in the mail with just 93 out of 50,000 vehicles delivered after three years. I am canceling this boondoggle and returning the funds to sender - the taxpayers!

elonmusk
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 8:01 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Such an obvious lie. So sad.

@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩

Trump fires back at Elon. The online battle begins. 🍿 https://t.co/q2TADQSAWC

VigilantFox
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 9:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The breakup between Trump and Musk is now official, marked by Trump’s comments about their past relationship and Musk's immediate rebuttals. Trump expressed disappointment over Musk's criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill, attributing it to financial motives related to EV subsidies. Musk countered, claiming Trump’s accusations were false and asserting his significant role in Trump’s election success. The tension escalated with Trump threatening to terminate Musk's government contracts, while Musk hinted at serious allegations against Trump. This unfolding drama highlights a significant political rift.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Trump/Musk breakup is now official. For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill. But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X. What happened next was painful to watch. Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

📍 And make sure to bookmark this thread—because no matter how this ends, we’re watching one of the greatest political alliances fall apart in real time. Let’s break it all down and roll the clips.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It came out of nowhere, but it hit like a category five hurricane. President Trump was hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz when a reporter asked a question that immediately changed the energy in the room: “What’s your reaction to Elon Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill?” The mood shifted. Trump didn’t hesitate. It was the beginning of what sounded like a very public political divorce. “I’ve always liked Elon,” Trump said. “So I was very surprised… He hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad.” Trump had stayed quiet for a while, but now, cornered with cameras rolling, he was ready to speak. “I’d rather have him criticize me than the bill,” Trump continued, praising the legislation as “incredible” and “the biggest cut in the history of our country… about $1.6 trillion.” Then came the pivot—and the reason for the rift, according to Trump. “Elon’s upset because we took the EV mandate,” he explained. “That was a lot of money for electric vehicles.” The way Trump described it, Musk’s problem wasn’t ideological—it was financial. “They want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it a long time ago. That hasn’t changed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says he has always liked Elon Musk and is surprised by Musk's criticism regarding the bill. He would rather Musk criticize him than the bill because the bill is incredible, with $1.6 trillion in cuts, the biggest tax cut in history. The bill includes unbelievable benefits for small businesses, people, and middle-income individuals. Musk is upset because the EV mandate, which provided a lot of money for electric vehicles, was removed. Electric vehicle companies are having a hard time and want billions of dollars in subsidies. The speaker claims Musk knew about this from the beginning, and it hasn't changed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister president. The criticism that I've seen and I'm sure you've seen regarding Elon Musk and your big beautiful bill, what's your reaction to that? Do you think it in any way hurts passage in the senate, which is, of course, what is your seeking? Speaker 1: Well, look, you know, I've always liked Elon, and it's always very surprised. You saw the words he had for me, the words of and he hasn't said anything about me that's bad. I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill because the bill is incredible. It's the biggest cut in the history of our country. We've never cut. It's about 1,600,000,000,000.0 in cuts. It's the biggest tax cut. Tax, you would say, people people's taxes will go way down, but it's the biggest tax cut in history. It's we have we are doing things in that bill that are unbelievable. And when you look at what we're doing for small businesses, for people, for middle income people, all of the things that we're doing, nobody's ever seen anything like it. And, you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate and you know, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles. And, you know, they're having a hard time with electric vehicles, and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And, you know, I I Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it for a long time ago. Speaker 0: That's been in there. That's been, Speaker 1: I would say, JD, that hasn't changed. That's been right from the beginning, mister I think, mister secretary. That hasn't changed at all right from the beginning. But I know that disturbed

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk responded to this immediately: “Whatever.” “Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.” https://t.co/DNML9nbj3T

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical information. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for. https://t.co/AfEghwSCHR

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But the electric vehicle subsidies weren’t the only flashpoint. Trump pointed to another moment of quiet friction. He said Musk had personally pushed for Jared Isaacman to be nominated as NASA administrator. Trump turned him down. “He recommended somebody that he, I guess, knew very well. I’m sure he respected him,” Trump said. “But I didn’t think it was appropriate.” Why? “He happened to be a Democrat. Like, totally Democrat.” Then Trump drew the political line. “We won,” he said. “We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges is we don’t have to appoint a Democrat.” He reiterated that NASA would remain in capable hands. “General Cain is going to be picking somebody.” But the implication was clear: Musk had tried to insert his own pick into a key government role—and when he didn’t get his way, the relationship began to fracture. “He wanted that person. And we said no,” Trump said. “And I can understand why he’s upset.” Then came a striking moment of reflection. “Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval Desk.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
He recommended someone he knew and respected to run NASA, but the speaker didn't think it was appropriate because the person was a Democrat. The speaker stated, "We won. We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges, we don't have to appoint a democrat." The speaker said NASA is very important and that General Cain will be picking someone, and they will be checking them out. The speaker understands why the person who made the recommendation is upset, noting "he was here for a long time" and "was very happy when he stood behind the oval desk."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He wanted and rightfully, you know, he recommended somebody from, that he, I guess, knew very well. I'm sure he respected him, but to run NASA. And I didn't think it was appropriate. And he happened to be a democrat, like, totally democrat. And I say, you know, look, we won. We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges, we don't have to appoint a democrat. NASA is very important. We have great people. General Cain is gonna be picking somebody with our we'll be we'll be checking them out and seeing, but he wanted that person, a certain person, and we said no. And, you know, I can understand why he's upset. Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the oval desk.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That’s when Trump crossed a line you don’t cross unless something’s truly over, and he dropped a line that made it clear. He started using the past tense. “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship,” he said. “I don’t know if we will anymore.” It was unmistakable. The phrasing, the delivery—it sounded like someone processing a falling-out in real time. Trump recalled better days: public events, warm praise, and headlines they once created together. “I was surprised—because you were here,” he told the room. “Everybody in this room, practically, was here as we had a wonderful sendoff.” “He said wonderful things about me. You couldn’t have said nicer—said the best things.” “He’s worn the hat, ‘Trump Was Right About Everything.’” Then Trump added with a tone of wounded pride: “And I am right about the great, big beautiful bill.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon and the speaker had a great relationship, though the current status is uncertain. The speaker recalls a wonderful send-off where Elon said very nice and the "best" things. Elon wore the hat. The speaker believes Trump was right about everything. The speaker also believes they are right about the "great big beautiful bill," which they describe as the biggest tax cuts in history and the biggest economic development moves anywhere. They claim nothing like it has ever been done before.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we're well anymore. I was surprised because you were here. Everybody in this room practically was here as we had a wonderful send off. He said wonderful things about me. You couldn't have nicer. Said the best thing. He's worn the hat. Trump was right about everything. And I am right about the great big beautiful bill. We call it a great big beautiful bill because that's what it is. And, again, biggest tax cuts in history, biggest economic development moves anywhere. We've never done anything like it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

As the comments continued, the emotion started bleeding through. Trump reminded everyone just how closely tied Musk had been to his movement. “Elon endorsed me very strongly,” he said. “He actually went up and campaigned for me.” But even in that, Trump made something else crystal clear: he believed he didn’t need Musk to win. “I think I would have won,” he said. “Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway.” “Even if the governor ran—the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota… He’s a sick puppy, that guy.” Then he doubled down: “If they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot.” Trump was saying that Musk’s support was appreciated—but not essential. And that made the fallout easier to frame. “I’m very disappointed,” he said. “Because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it.” He circled back to the heart of the disagreement: the subsidies. “He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem—when he found out we’re going to have to cut the EV mandate. That’s billions and billions of dollars. And it really is unfair. We want to have cars of all types.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon endorsed the speaker and campaigned for them. The speaker believes they would have won Pennsylvania easily, even if the "real governor" or Shapiro had run. The speaker is disappointed because Elon, who initially knew the bill's inner workings and had no problem with it, suddenly developed a problem when he learned about the EV mandate cut. This cut would save billions of dollars but is considered unfair. The speaker wants cars of all types, including electric, gasoline, combustion, and hybrids, and wants to be able to sell everything. Elon became "different" when Congress wanted to cut the EV mandate, which the speaker understands. Elon knew every aspect of the bill better than almost anybody.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won. Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway, even if the governor ran, the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota who's I mean, he's a sick puppy. That guy that poor guy feels sorry for him. But, they they made a bad choice with him. But if you pick Shapiro or anybody else, I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible. But if they picked him, would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot. But I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars, and it really is unfair. We wanna have cars of all types. Electric, we wanna have electric, but we wanna have a gasoline, combustion. We wanna have different. We wanna have hybrids. We wanna have all we wanna be able to sell everything. And when that was cut, and congress wanted to cut it, he became a little bit different, and I can understand that. But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But Musk was ready and waiting. He weighed in on the president’s claim about Pennsylvania, and he took it one step further. Musk said: “Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.” He added: “Such ingratitude”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And then Musk called out Trump’s claim that he knew the inner workings of the Big Beautiful Bill. “False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!” https://t.co/G1HQKpoIbo

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Back in the Oval Office, the mood darkened again as Trump made a quiet prediction. “He hasn’t said bad about me personally,” he said. “But I’m sure that’ll be next.” There was no mistaking it now. This was a full-blown breakup. “I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot,” Trump said, his voice tightening. A reporter jumped in, asking the obvious: Had Musk brought any of these concerns to him in private before blasting them in public? Trump didn’t dodge. “No,” he said flatly. “He worked hard and he did a good job.” Then came a flash of emotional insight—a glimpse into how Trump sees these departures. “I think he misses the place,” he said. “ He got out there, and all of a sudden he wasn’t in this beautiful Oval Office.” “And he was,” Trump added. “And he’s got nice offices too. But there’s something about this one.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses disappointment in Elon, stating, "I've helped Elon a lot." Speaker 1 asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public and questions whether Elon should be taken seriously about spending cuts, given his role in that area. Speaker 0 responds that Elon worked hard and did a good job, suggesting Elon misses his former position, noting the unique appeal of the Oval Office.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot. Speaker 1: Did he I just wanna clarify. Did he raise any of these concerns with you privately before he raised them publicly? And this is the guy you put in charge of cutting spending. Should people not take him seriously about spending now? Are you saying this is all sour grapes? Speaker 0: No. He worked hard and he did a good job. And I'll be honest, think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office and he was and he's got nice offices too, but there's something about this

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

As the dust settled, Trump zoomed out. And what he said next felt like the conclusion to a pattern. “He’s not the first,” he said. “People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly.” “Some of them embrace it. And some of them actually become hostile. I don’t know what it is.” Then, with a knowing smirk: “It’s sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I guess they call it.” It wasn’t just Musk anymore. Trump was describing a cycle—an emotional shift he believes happens to those who leave his orbit. “They leave and they wake up in the morning—and the glamor is gone. The whole world is different. And they become hostile. I don’t know what it is.” And then, he ended with: “Someday you’ll write a book about it and you’ll let us know.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
People leave my administration, and some miss it so badly that they either embrace it or become hostile. It's "Trump derangement syndrome," or they wake up and the glamour is gone, and the whole world is different, so they become hostile.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly. And some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it. But I we have it with others too. They leave and they wake up in the morning and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different and they become hostile. I don't know what it is. Someday you'll write a book about it and you'll let us know. Yeah.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But after the Oval Office meeting was finished, the real fireworks started. President Trump took to Truth social and launched an all-out assault on Musk: “Elon was “wearing thin,” I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Trump followed up with: “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” https://t.co/RiAIVhss0R

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That’s when Elon Musk blew up the internet with this response: “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!” https://t.co/Kmrvc9RUKh

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump Elon added, “Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.” https://t.co/fxAz5x4dl9

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SUMMARY 1.) Trump confirmed the breakup and used the past tense to describe their relationship. • He said, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” signaling a clear end to their alliance. 2.) Trump accused Musk of being upset over losing billions in EV subsidies. • He claimed Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill was financially motivated—not ideological. 3.) Musk immediately fired back on X and called Trump’s claims false. • He said he was never shown the bill, called Trump ungrateful, and defended the EV/solar incentives while blasting the “disgusting pork.” 4.) Trump revealed Musk tried to get Democrat Jared Isaacman nominated to lead NASA. 5.) Trump added he didn’t need Musk to win and would’ve taken Pennsylvania without him. • In response, Musk claimed that without his backing, Trump would have lost the election, and Democrats would control Congress. 6.) Trump took off the gloves and posted on Truth Social: • He said, “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!” 7.) That’s when Elon blew everything up. • He responded, “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump This story is still unfolding. I’m tracking every update in real time. Bookmark this post and come back to it later. Also, share it with a friend who needs a quick catch-up. There’s no reversing what’s been said. Stay tuned—this story is just beginning. https://t.co/Rc4FkLlrmY

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Trump/Musk breakup is now official. For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill. But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X. What happened next was painful to watch. Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #1: At 4:09 PM Eastern, Elon Musk writes: “In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.” This announcement followed President Trump’s earlier threat to terminate federal subsidies and contracts with Musk’s companies, including SpaceX and Tesla.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #2: Elon quote-tweets a post linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein with a raised eyebrow emoji. The post claims Trump flew on Epstein’s plane at least 7 times, though there’s no proof he visited the island. It also highlights a 2002 New York Magazine quote where Trump described Epstein as “a terrific guy” who “likes beautiful women… on the younger side.” (See image for full quote)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #3: Trump responds to Elon publicly attacking him, saying: “I don’t mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It’s a Record Cut in Expenses—$1.6 Trillion Dollars—and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn’t pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn’t create this mess—I’m just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX UPDATE #4: At 4:43 PM Eastern, Elon Musk drops another raised eyebrow emoji—this time on a post by @chesschick01 that reads: “In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:” https://t.co/q0Kac0xjts https://t.co/cAXjfl5kHr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Footage from a 1992 Mar-a-Lago party shows Trump interacting with Jeffrey Epstein. The party, filmed before Mar-a-Lago became a club, featured cheerleaders and captured Trump's bachelor lifestyle for Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. The video shows Trump surrounded by women, then greeting Epstein and two others. Trump is seen talking to Epstein while women dance nearby. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein, also mentioning the cameras. Trump gestures to one woman, saying to Epstein, "look at her back there. She's hot." He then whispers something that makes Epstein laugh.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of a Mar A Lago party shows Trump giving Epstein his personal attention. The footage shot in November of nineteen ninety two before Trump opened the resort as a club shows the future president surrounded by cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins, capturing Trump's fun loving bachelor lifestyle for an appearance on Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. We're gonna get great ratings in your show. Trump is surrounded by women as music blares in the background. After a while, Trump goes to greet three new guests. Among them, the financier Jeffrey Epstein. Come on in. Come inside. More than a decade before his guilty plea on state prostitution charges. Later in the footage, Trump is seen talking to Epstein and another man as women are dancing in front of them. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein and the other man and telling Epstein about the cameras. Though exactly what they say is difficult to understand as they discuss the women and their appearances, Trump gestures to one and appears to say to Epstein, look at her back there. She's hot. And then Trump says something else into Epstein's ear that makes him double over with laughter. But as the president

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

🤨

@Chesschick01 - Natalie F Danelishen

In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Footage from a 1992 Mar-a-Lago party shows Trump interacting with Jeffrey Epstein. The video, filmed before Mar-a-Lago became a club, features Trump surrounded by cheerleaders and was intended for Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. Trump greets Epstein and two others, then is seen talking to Epstein while women dance nearby. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein, also mentioning the cameras. Trump gestures to one woman, saying to Epstein, "look at her back there. She's hot," and then whispers something that makes Epstein laugh.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of a Mar A Lago party shows Trump giving Epstein his personal attention. The footage, shot in November of nineteen ninety two before Trump opened the resort as a club, shows the future president surrounded by cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins, capturing Trump's fun loving bachelor lifestyle for an appearance on Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. I'm gonna get great ratings on your surrounded by women as music blares in the background. After a while, Trump goes to greet three new guests. Among them, the financier Jeffrey Epstein. Come on in. Georgia. More than a decade before his guilty plea on state prostitution charges. Later in the footage, Trump is seen talking to Epstein and another man as women are dancing in front of him. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein and the other man and telling Epstein about the cameras. Though exactly what they say is difficult to understand as they discuss the women and their appearances, Trump gestures to one and appears to say to Epstein, look at her back there. She's hot. And then Trump says something else into Epstein's ear that makes him double over with laughter. But as the president

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 UPDATE #5: Elon Musk replies “Yes” to a post by @stillgray that reads: “President vs Elon. Who wins? My money’s on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.” https://t.co/YGyBsiGoSo

Ryan_r_Williams
Posted - June 12, 2025 at 1:20 PM
Saved - June 12, 2025 at 4:26 PM

@Ryan_r_Williams - Ryan Williams

🚨 By 2035, you’ll be banned from buying a gas or hybrid car in Canada — even if it’s made here. No debate. No vote. Guilbeault rewrote CEPA. Carney won’t reverse it. In -40°C winters & rural blackouts, EVs can’t cut it. Let Canadians choose. #cdnpoli https://t.co/vxeyZNq3E2

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, Canada has an electric vehicle mandate, implemented without parliamentary debate, requiring all vehicles sold in Canada to be electric by 2035. This was enacted by the environmental minister through changes to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA). The speaker believes this mandate is an example of government overreach, citing challenges posed by Canada's cold climate, the needs of rural Canadians, and power outages that would render electric vehicles unusable. The speaker contrasts this approach with the conservative viewpoint, which emphasizes individual choice and ensuring the infrastructure is in place to support those who choose electric vehicles. The speaker states conservatives prioritize equal opportunity in areas like education, employment, healthcare, and family raising.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not many Canadians know there's an electric vehicle mandate in place right now. It was without a debate in parliament that says by 02/1935, you can no longer buy in Canada a hybrid or gas car. You have to buy an electric automobile. It was quietly put in place by the environmental minister, Guibaud, in the last parliament, and he just changed CEPA, the Environmental Protection Act. And all they did was said that all vehicles made in Canada have to have zero emissions. It's an example where government thinks they know best. And, you know, the examples we give of why this doesn't work, not only with the cold climate we have here and rural Canadians who, you know, need their vehicles, but Peterborough just had a powder outage, three weeks ago. Was one of the only Sundays we didn't door knock and power was up for five days. At that point, you don't have a car if you have an electric vehicle and you can't power it. It's another it's an example where government thinks they know best. Or our our alternative is if you as a family believe that you want electric vehicle, then buy one. Make sure you get the adapter in your home. As a government our job is to make sure the infrastructure is there, the power grid, know if we need whatever that power supply is, but it's not to tell you to buy that vehicle and that's the difference in a nutshell between conservatives and liberal governments. We really believe in the power of people that you can go if you as long as you have the opportunity. We want to make sure people have equal opportunity for education, equal opportunity to get a good job. There's lots of good jobs available, equal opportunity to health care, equal opportunity to be able to raise a family. Those are the things that are important to us. And that's why I'm a conservative. What is the concern?
TrumpWarRoom
Posted - July 6, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Saved - July 7, 2025 at 3:52 AM

@TrumpWarRoom - Trump War Room

https://t.co/62ZWNSvFfg

disclosetv
Posted - July 6, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Saved - July 7, 2025 at 12:46 AM

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

JUST IN - Trump calls Elon a "TRAIN WRECK" that's gone completely "'off the rails.'" https://t.co/uoz7548ukj

SawyerMerritt
Posted - July 6, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Saved - July 7, 2025 at 6:41 PM

@SawyerMerritt - Sawyer Merritt

Trump has just posted about Elon Musk on Truth Social: https://t.co/EZ7hUNSwHr

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@SawyerMerritt What’s Truth Social?

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@SawyerMerritt Never heard of it

heydave7
Posted - July 6, 2025 at 10:59 PM
Saved - July 7, 2025 at 6:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user expressed concern that someone close to the President should inform him that Elon Musk is more upset about the federal debt increase of $5 trillion than the electric vehicle mandate. Musk agreed, questioning the purpose of DOGE if the debt is rising. Another participant criticized Musk for supporting Trump, claiming he was used for political distraction and that Trump had no real interest in reducing the debt. Musk responded with disappointment, acknowledging the criticism.

@heydave7 - Dave Lee

Someone close to the President ought to tell him the truth. Elon isn’t mad about the EV mandate. He’s upset about $5 trillion being added to the federal debt in next 2 years. Of all the people close to him, I would expect VP Vance to understand this. He should make sure the President has his facts straight.

@SawyerMerritt - Sawyer Merritt

Trump has just posted about Elon Musk on Truth Social: https://t.co/EZ7hUNSwHr

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@heydave7 💯

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@heydave7 What the heck was the point of @DOGE if he’s just going to increase the debt by $5 trillion??

@alex_avoigt - Alex

Many told you that Trump will use you for his benefit and drop you right after but you didn't want to hear it. DOGE has been nothing else than an intended public distraction and you helped him very much to implement it successfully. Trump had never the slightest interest to reduce the US debt or reduce its increase but to eliminate political opponents and create the impression he is doing something while he worked on what matters to him which is the bill. I wish you would have listened to all the voices that tried to open your eyes but you've been blindely following him and achieved the opposite of what you stand for.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@alex_avoigt @heydave7 @DOGE 😞

View Full Interactive Feed