reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 1, 2023 at 6:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2008, the Federal Reserve initiated a massive bailout for Wall Street and banks. Initially meant to be temporary, the bailout has now grown to a staggering $8 trillion, nine times its original size. This enormous sum equates to $23,000 for every person in the US or four months of GDP. Attempts to unwind the bailout have been met with resistance from Wall Street. While it may have seemed inconsequential to the real economy, the recent surge in core US inflation has changed the game. The Fed is now attempting to cut its balance sheet and raise rates, but banks, addicted to cheap cash, are causing a crisis. In response, the Fed is offering yet another subsidy to banks, this time for bonds affected by interest rates. This ongoing bailout only benefits the super-rich and cannot be sustained indefinitely. The future outcome remains uncertain, but the Fed's ability to prop up the banking industry is not limitless.

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

1/ In 2008, the @federalreserve began an unprecedented bailout of Wall Street and banks. The bailout was supposed to be temporary. Except that the Fed's balance sheet - basically money it has created to backstop banks - is now nine times - or $8 trillion -more than it was then...

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

2/ $8 trillion is an unfathomably large number - $23,000 for every man, woman, and child in the United States, four months of GDP. And whenever the Fed even tries to unwind it, to get the banks off the backstop, Wall Street goes berserk...

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

3/ For a while, no one except a few populists (mostly on the left, though increasingly on the right too) paid much attention to this incredible subsidy to the richest people in the world - on Wall Street and Silicon Valley -which both feasted on cheap capital...

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

4/ Why? Because it didn't seem to matter to the real economy. Why? Because inflation was still low. And as long as inflation was still low, the Fed could brush off complaints it was worsening inequality...

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

5/ And encouraging systemic risk-taking by flooding banks with too much cheap capital. But the bill always comes due. Always. And it’s due now. The core US inflation rate exploded in 2021 and despite what the White House wants to pretend there is little sign it’s retreating.

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

6/ So the Fed is FINALLY trying to cut its balance sheet and raise rates - to pull money out of the system since inflation is a monetary phenomenon. Only it's stuck. Banks are so addicted to cheap cash that even the Fed's relatively small moves so far have caused a crisis...

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

7/ A crisis that has led the Fed not just to stop its efforts to restore balance to the system BUT TO REVERSE THEM BY OFFERING YET ANOTHER SUBSIDY TO BANKS, this time for bonds ruined by interest rates: "These assets will be valued at par." https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20230312a.htm

Federal Reserve Board announces it will make available additional funding to eligible depository institutions to help assure banks have the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors To support American businesses and households, the Federal Reserve Board on Sunday announced it will make available additional funding to eligible depository i federalreserve.gov

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

8/ Again the Fed is giving banks a bailout for short-term stability, just like it did in 2008. Only we are 15 YEARS ON and the bailout hasn't gone away. And the only people who benefit in the long run are the superrich, who can take advantage of the economic distortions here.

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

9/ Where and how does all this end? I don't know. But it WILL end. Even the Fed cannot prop up the banking industry forever.

Saved - June 4, 2024 at 5:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The central banks are trapped in a black hole of their own design, facing a choice between saving their currencies or the system itself. The Federal Reserve has trapped the Treasury beyond the event horizon, and the financial gravity is becoming overwhelmingly strong. The United States' hegemonic influence of the Dollar has made it a superpower, but this could also become an existential risk. The US has weaponized the Dollar, but this power cannot last forever. The banking system is breaking, with an accelerating withdrawal of money throughout the system. Sanctions against Russia and the actions of the Bank of Japan are causing concerns. The US is edging towards default, and the drums of economic war are beating. The Treasury's debt issuance is going parabolic, and Kuroda's strategy in Japan is failing. Argentina is facing exponential inflation, and China is teetering on the brink. The Fed may be repeating the mistakes of the Bank of Amsterdam, and there is a movement to direct register the float of an entire company. The financial system is complex, and the SEC's incompetence is staggering. There are discussions on various topics such as Ayahuasca, the singularity in the monetary system, and the illusion of the financial system. The posts also touch on the recent events surrounding GameStop, the Chinese shadow banks, and the commercial property market. The Bank of Japan is stuck beyond the event horizon, and arguments for infinite liquidity are criticized. Gold's recent rally may signal the end of Western manipulation, and the quality of economic data is questioned. The Japanese Yen crisis and the potential currency crisis in Japan are also discussed.

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Peruvian Bull Meta Thread: A compilation of all my best work. The central banks are trapped in a black hole of their own design. They will soon be forced to choose which to save- their currencies or the system itself. The Dollar Endgame Thesis. 🧡πŸ”₯πŸ‘‡ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0yIATTy0J8

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Federal Reserve has trapped the Treasury beyond the event horizon. The Financial Gravity is now overwhelmingly strong πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Financial Gravity and the Fed's Dilemma: The Fed is trapped in a black hole of it's own design. There is no way out; only hard choices lie ahead. A Thread πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The United States has become a superpower due to hegemonic influence of the Dollar. However, this can become an existential risk. πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Dollar as a World Reserve Currency has allowed the US to subjugate the entire world and become an Empire. However- our greatest weapon could turn into an existential risk. A Thread πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The US has weaponized the Dollar to be a secret Excalibur. To punish enemies far and wide. However, this power cannot last forever... πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Dollar is the world reserve currency. This grants immense geopolitical and economic hegemony to the United States. But, Treasury wants to keep their Excalibur a secret. A Thread: πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Federal Reserve has stolen the American Dream. Only the wealthy have benefited. πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Federal Reserve is responsible for far more of the evils in this world than you can possibly imagine. A thread: πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The banking system is breaking. πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Fed’s O/N Reverse Repo figure has been sitting at a record $2.2 Trillion, shattering all previous records. Time to follow a thread πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡...

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

There's an accelerating withdrawal of money throughout the banking system. The Fed has created a Singularity which is ripping apart the banks. πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

A new financial crisis is brewing. There is an accelerating withdrawal of money throughout the entire system. The Dying Banks and the Singularity. A Thread πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The sanctions against Russia have wounded them. But could this be a bridge to far for the World Reserve Currency? πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

A lot has changed in just under a week. The timeline has accelerated. Let me explain πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Japanese have wandered far into the oceanic depths. Have they finally encountered a monster even the mighty BoJ cannot defeat? πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Japanese Yen surged this morning as the BOJ undertook a surprising change in policy and raised the cap on the 10yr bond to 0.50% They are battling a Godzilla. Can they win? A short thread πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Dissection of SVB's financials just prior to collapse. What if they're not an anomaly?πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Most people don't realize how crucial Silicon Valley Bank is. Billions of dollars in venture debt. Untold amounts of warrants and convertible notes in early-stage firms. If SVB fails, this could be the Lehman moment for the startup world.

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Republicans and Democrats are edging default. If the US actually failed to pay its Treasury bonds, the results would be disastrous πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

1/ The United States is one of the largest economies in the world and holds $31T of federal debt. However, if the country were to default on its obligations, the consequences would be far-reaching and severe. Time for a thread. πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The drums of economic war have begun to beat. The cracks are widening in the dollar based global monetary system ... πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Battle has begun for the future of the global monetary system. The fate of superpowers hangs in the balance. Bretton Woods III: Economic Warfare 🧡πŸ”₯πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Treasury is accelerating beyond the Event Horizon. The debt issuance is going parabolic. πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The United States is entering an exponential debt spiral. Welcome to the Monetary Event Horizon. A Thread βš‘οΈπŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Kuroda's strategy of Yield Curve Control is beginning to fail...πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Japanese are desperately trying to hold the line against the odds on their plan of Yield Curve Control. The Bank of Japan is TRAPPED. A THREADπŸ‘‡πŸ§΅πŸ”₯

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Argentina is falling apart. Exponential inflation is here πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Argentina Enters the Endgame- Is the beleaguered South American nation in the early stages of hyperinflation? A THREAD πŸ‘‡πŸ§΅πŸ”₯

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Chinese are teetering πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Warning signals are flashing red in the world’s largest real estate market. Is China on the brink of another 2008? a thread 🧡πŸ”₯πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Could the Fed be repeating the same mistakes as the Bank of Amsterdam before the collapse of the Guilder? πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Bank of Amsterdam's collapse signaled the end of the Guilder as a reserve currency. Could history be repeating itself? How the first Central Bank Died- A Thread. 🧡πŸ”₯πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Not finance related, but Ayahuasca is a powerful medicine for transformation πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

My Ayahuasca experience: Opening the Door to the Heart of Darkness. A thread about encountering the Jungian Shadow πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Deep in the monetary black hole, hides the Singularity. It could change everything πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

THE SINGULARITY: There exists a hidden flaw in the monetary system, deep into the Black Hole... that could spell disaster for fiat currencies. A THREAD πŸ‘‡βš‘οΈ https://substackfwd.xyz/?url=https://dollarendgame.substack.com/p/the-singularity

The Singularity There exists a hidden flaw in the monetary system, deep into the Black Hole... that could spell disaster for the Dollar. substackfwd.xyz

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Fed has created a Financial Illusion greater than any other. What is left of Economic Reality? πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/aH5g1QDL2Z

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Simulacrum: what if our financial markets are an illusion- and the abstraction has overtaken reality? The Fed has broken the Financial Matrix. A THREAD 🧡πŸ”₯πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/nSVDmtEHra

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The financial system is not some monolith upon which all transactions are made. It's far more complex (and interesting) πŸ‘‡βš‘οΈ https://t.co/39rFFnHmIW

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Layered Money The financial system doesn't work how you think it does. A THREAD πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡βš‘οΈ

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The SEC's incompetence is staggering. Are they complicit in the financial crimes of the people they regulate? πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/ds7xMKoa0l

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The SEC is a criminal organization. The true story of their epic failure to prosecute the largest fraud of all time: Bernie Madoff. A Thread πŸ§΅βš‘οΈπŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

There is a movement to direct register the float of an entire company. Barely anyone in the financial world knows about this πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/m3yOY5OMz0

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

PowerPoint on Gamestop and DRS- A THREAD πŸ‘‡πŸ§΅βš‘οΈ (1/31) https://t.co/s7dViDTEXw

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Did the Saudis make a secret deal selling oil for gold? ANOTHER revealed this controversial theory in 1997-could it still be in place?

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

ANOTHER: The controversial anon blogger in 1997 who revealed an astounding gold-for-oil deal hidden in the markets that shaped geopolitics for the last few decades. A THREAD πŸ§΅βš‘οΈπŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

$GME almost broke the financial system, until they panicked and turned off the buy button. Dive in πŸ‘‡πŸ€― https://t.co/9WKlENasN5

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

3 YEARS AGO TODAY, JAN 28th 2021: Price was going parabolic, and then Robinhood turned off the BUY BUTTON on $GME. What was revealed would shock the financial world- and the story still isn't over! A THREAD 🧡πŸ”₯πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/47rH6RoFVV

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

China's deflationary crisis has been spreading to equities, and authorities will utilize the inevitable liquidity injections to save the day. Are things going from bad to worse for the Asian behemoth? πŸ‘‡βš‘οΈ https://t.co/K5BV3vXg3K

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Crisis in Shanghai: Stock markets are getting hit hard in China, indicative of a vicious deleveraging cycle. CPI print was NEGATIVE again in December. What will they do to stem the bleeding? A THREAD πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡βš‘οΈ https://t.co/CwI10QJXgA

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Was $GME on the way to being cellar-boxed by malicious market makers before January 2021? Their playbook for bankrupting companies πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/y3ug9i83kE

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

CELLAR BOXING: A post made in March 2004 laying out the entire naked shorting scam- how Market Makers profit from destroying companies. This is how they steal your wealth! $GME $AMC $MMTLP A THREAD 🧡πŸ”₯πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Chinese shadow banks are falling like dominoes. Are their real estate woes big enough to bring China down? πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/0A4ToXZURK

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

China Crumbles: Xi's economic miracle is running into serious problems. Now the property market contagion is spreading to the shadow banking sector, and authorities are panicking on what to do. A THREAD: πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡πŸ”₯ https://t.co/wNT8lKPnVC

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Regional banks are heavily exposed to the commercial property market. Is the downturn just beginning? πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/bwU10M7CHd

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Shades of 2008? Warning signs are brewing in the commercial property market, and contagion is already beginning to spread to Europe. Are we seeing the CRE version of the Financial Crisis? A THREAD 🧡πŸ”₯πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Bank of Japan is stuck beyond the Event Horizon. The recent rate hike only confirms it πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/3pjudSCKJV

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The BoJ is Trapped: The Bank of Japan just raised rates for the first time since 2007. Is Ueda sleepwalking into a currency crisis? A THREAD πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡βš‘οΈ

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The arguments for infinite liquidity are nonsensical. Don't believe the dogma that unlimited naked shorting and excessive derivatives are positive outcomes for markets πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/0u9KqOnEME

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

some tradfi bros like @ConwayYen disagree with a lot of what I say. since they are intelligent, their points are worth considering. but they are WRONG! Time for a thread on $GME, DRS, and the morality of markets. πŸ§΅βš‘οΈπŸ‘‡ https://t.co/LyuXTG4wO3

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Gold's recent rip could be a sign that decades of Western manipulation of bullion is finally coming to an end. But is this rally an omen of something far worse happening in global macro? βš‘οΈπŸ‘‡ https://t.co/p9JY4DnAKt

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Gold Endgame Begins: Gold is ripping to new all-time highs, and China could be behind the move. Is the Western gold market manipulation finally reaching its finale? A THREAD πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡πŸ”₯ https://t.co/MpZ6a9ZysN

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Unemployment, Payrolls, and CPI all have problems. And the quality of the data seems to be getting worse πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/DZthbyrl2E

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Potemkin Economy: More and more news reports come out concerning the booming economy- but underneath the surface, things are not as they seem. Can we even trust the veracity of the data anymore? A THREAD πŸ‘‡βš‘οΈπŸ§΅

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

A stellar Twitter Spaces on the Japanese Yen Crisis with informative rants from @acrossthespread and @DarioCpx Probably the best spaces we've ever done πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/3wXhHNEcGv

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

https://t.co/j0JXD9pt0P

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

@acrossthespread @DarioCpx Japan is currently trying to ride both sides of the impossible trilemma, and their currency is blowing out. Another step in the Dollar Endgame πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Tokyo Drifting Into A Currency Crisis The Bank of Japan intervened twice last week as JPY crossed the redline set in September 2022. What lies in store for the Japanese Yen? A THREAD πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡πŸ”₯ https://t.co/qbNkGaqM0W

Saved - October 19, 2023 at 3:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The global financial system faces a potential "black swan" event, capable of wiping out the world economy with a $100 trillion impact. Factors like rising interest rates, declining asset prices, and loss of confidence in the financial system contribute to this volatile situation. Excessive US spending and geopolitical tensions further strain the system. Recent bank failures and a ballooning commercial real estate bubble add to the imminent collapse. Learn more at: [source]. (499 characters)

@QuantumParty_ - Quantum Party

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has warned that the global financial system is on the brink of a $100 trillion dollar "black swan" event - a perfect storm large enough to wipe out the entire world economy.

@QuantumParty_ - Quantum Party

This (highly volatile) financial weapon-of-mass-destruction could be triggered by a wide range of factors, including a sharp rise in interest rates, a decline in asset prices, or a sudden loss of confidence in the financial system. All of which are in the process of happening now

@QuantumParty_ - Quantum Party

As the US continues it's out-of-control spending, and continues alienating the rest of the world with shameless imperialism in Ukraine, (causing them to abandon the dollar en-mass), the Fed will be forced to keep raising interest rates sharply to combat intensifying inflation.

@QuantumParty_ - Quantum Party

Dramatic rate increases have caused a number of banks to collapse. In March 2023, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank failed, becoming the largest bank failures in recent history. Many other banks are now teetering on the brink, and the entire system is about to collapse.

@QuantumParty_ - Quantum Party

Real Estate prices rose rapidly in recent years, fueled by easy credit and speculative investment. However, between the sharp interest rate increases, and the dramatic decrease in demand caused by the pandemic, our commercial real estate market has ballooned into a massive bubble

@QuantumParty_ - Quantum Party

Learn More at: https://quantumparty.org/banking

Banking | Quantum Party of America quantumparty.org
Saved - August 30, 2023 at 6:38 PM

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

Current unrealized losses in the US banking system is -$1.8 trillion out of only $2.2 trillion capital With corporate taxes due Sep 15 & possible gov shutdown Oct 2, the general public has no idea the banks are already insolvent entering a nightmare liquidity scenario in October

Video Transcript AI Summary
US banks are facing significant losses due to the decrease in value of securities and loans caused by rising interest rates. Estimates suggest that the overall losses for the US banking system could reach $1.8 trillion, making many smaller banks insolvent. The higher rate regime is considered a major threat due to the current high levels of debt, which were not present during previous periods of high interest rates. The combination of negative supply shocks, reduced growth, and inflation, along with high debt ratios, creates an unstable economic and financial environment. Central banks' attempts to achieve both price stability and financial stability are challenged by the systemic risks and potential insolvency faced by banks. This situation is expected to lead to a credit crunch, tightening of credit standards, and a significant impact on the real economy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And for the overall U. S. Banks, you have about $620,000,000,000 of unrealized losses on the securities out of a capital of $2,200,000,000,000 and for some of the regional banks, the number are much higher. But it's not just the securities of lower value. Many of the banks had issued loans like mortgages at fixed rates at 30% 30 years when interest rates were 1%, while right now there are 3.5 or 10 year treasury. So the market value of those assets is also down. People have estimated, therefore, the overall losses for the U. S. Banking system for the rise in interest rates, both on securities and loans are equivalent to 1,800,000,000,000 out of a capital of $2,200,000,000,000. Hundreds of the smaller banks are literally insolvent. So that's the fundamental problem. When interest rates go higher, the value of securities and loans is lower and then we have mass liquidity and solvency problems. Speaker 1: Your recent book was called Mega Threats: Ten dangerous trends that imperil our future. And I wonder if this is among them. You know, interest rates at 5% or even 6% Don't seem like a mega threat. We've had rates as high as 20% in recent history in the early eighties, but we have so much more debt Now than we did back then, which means carrying costs are much more painful. Is this higher rate regime a mega threatner, Yael? Speaker 0: It is because in 1970s, when we had the stagflationary shock the led to inflation and recession, debt ratios in advanced economies were only 100% of GDP private and public debt. Today there are $420,000,000. So we have the worst of the $70,000,000 in terms of negative supply shock, reduced growth and cost inflation and we have debt ratio that are much higher than after the GFC crisis. And during the GFC crisis, we had a debt problem, housing debt, mortgages, bank debt, but we had negative demand shocks and a credit crunch that led to deflation, so we could do massive monetary, fiscal and credit easing. Now we're entering a session and financial instability having to raise interest rates because the inflation is too high. So we get inconsistency in a trilemma. We cannot achieve price stability, maintain economic growth, have financial stability at the same time. So eventually, we'll have an economic and financial crash. Speaker 2: I mean, central banks say they can do those 2 things. Good morning to you, Nouriel. They say that they can have financial stability and they can, control monetary policy because they're policy because they're different levers dealing with different problems, you doubt that? Speaker 0: Yeah, there's this separation principle that says We're going to use the interest rate policy for price stability and we're going to use liquidity to backstop the financial system and have financial stability. But that occurs only when the problems of financial system are purely liquidity and limited to individual institutions. When you have a systemic problem and there is a risk of insolvency, and by the way, an economic recession is going to lead us from duration and market risk to credit risk, you cannot essentially lose liquidity support of the banks as a way of backstopping the system and there's an inconsistency between price stability and financial stability and we're headed towards hard landing, a credit crunch and significant amounts of losses, both for debtors that are facing much higher nominal and real rates, but also for savers and creditors because rising interest rates reduces the market value of their creditors assets. So you have financial instability, price instability and economic instability. Speaker 2: You used the phrase credit crunch and we all threw around the term credit crisis in the late 2000s. We know that, that led to the financial crisis and everything that followed. How bad do you think this credit crunch gets this time around? We heard the Fed uncertain and many voices uncertain about How much we see a pullback in the offering of credit? Speaker 0: Well, most of the financing to SMEs and to households in the U. S. Occurs not from the large money center banks, but from these regional banks and these regional banks are in trouble. There is deposit flight, there are insured deposits, there are fundamental security losses. There will be a tightening of credit and credit standards, left even more cautious, they left to raise capital. So they're going to lend more. Credit growth is going to probably go from 10% annualized to close it to 0 and therefore a good chunk of main street and Middle America is going to be subject to a significant credit crunch That's going to exacerbate the risk of a harder landing of the real economy.

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

Charles Schwab owes 130% of their total equity capital to short duration FHLB loans that have to be paid back soon. Total assets $350 billion... There's your September Lehman Brothers. https://t.co/Rr492EJgeN

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

Bear Stearns Collapse March 16, 2008 Lehman Brothers Collapse September 15, 2008 Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 10, 2023 ******************* Collapse September 15, 2023 🀫 https://t.co/kfdPWKxt1d https://t.co/qBMYgTkITR https://t.co/VqtC8XyGSu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bayer employees were shocked to learn that JPMorgan had bought their company for only $2 per share. Some even cried, unable to believe the low price. Bear Stearns, which had bet heavily on the housing market, collapsed in just seven days. The entire country had been encouraged to invest in housing, leading to people taking mortgages they couldn't afford. The government blamed homeowners for their situation but believed Wall Street would be fine. Despite mounting evidence of a toxic housing market, Paulson and Bernanke insisted everything was well and that the subprime crisis would be contained. However, the impact was far-reaching, contrary to their claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At 6 o'clock, the Bayer employees received the word. A lot of price talk that we had been hearing was, you know, in the $20 range, maybe $15. So when they announced that we were being sold to JPMorgan for the princely sum of $2 per share, it was it was a shock. Speaker 1: There there were people that actually cried. Speaker 2: People thought it was a misprint. They thought it must have been Couple zeros left off. They were wrong. It was $2. Speaker 1: You know, how could this possibly have happened? You know, total denial. No responsibility. Speaker 2: It had taken 7 days. Bear Stearns was gone. Speaker 3: They're saying that the bubble will not burst. There's plenty July was still the strongest housing salesman Speaker 2: Bear Stearns had not been alone Betting on housing. Until the market collapsed, the entire country had been encouraged to do the same thing. Speaker 3: Lying along for years. Speaker 0: You can see that people were taking Mortgages that they obviously couldn't afford. Speaker 1: Go to a cocktail party or you go to a barbecue and 2 or 3 of the people that were there were telling you how wealthy they were because the value of their home had gone so high. Speaker 0: Nobody cared if they could afford the payments. Because the act of buying the house itself meant that you were gonna get rich. Speaker 4: The government's attitude towards homeowners was they did it to themselves. That's the way it goes. The government's attitudes towards Wall Street was these are a bunch of smart sophisticated people. Yeah, they made mistakes, but the system is fine and we'll be okay. Speaker 5: I have the greatest confidence in the resiliency, flexibility, and strength of our economy and our capital Speaker 2: Both Paulson and Bernanke continued to insist all was well in the face of mounting evidence that the housing market had turned toxic. Speaker 6: The impact of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained. Speaker 3: Contained. That was their word, contained. And meaning that it was not gonna spread. It wasn't going to infect the rest of the economy. Speaker 6: By the way, the economy turn around? Yes. Speaker 1: I'm not an economist.

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

@FinanceLancelot The same day #Lehman collapsed πŸ€ͺ

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 12:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Fed pays $723M daily to banks on reverse repos and interest on reserves. Previously profitable, it now supports a fragile system, creating programs to prevent collapse. This results in a $723M daily loss to hold it all together.

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

The Fed is paying $723 million PER DAY to commercial banks on reverse repos and interest on reserves. Back a few years ago, the Fed used to be profitable and sent it's profits to the US Treasury. But in recent years, in order to keep everything from collapsing, the Fed has been forced to create more and more programs to support the house of cards. This has resulted in this crazy system where the Fed is losing $723 million per day to hold it all together.

@RealEJAntoni - E.J. Antoni, Ph.D.

$723 million in daily interest curtesy of the Fed sterilizing $4.9 trillion...

Saved - October 2, 2023 at 4:01 PM

@PeterSchiff - Peter Schiff

As I've been warning, we are still early in the biggest #bond market crash in U.S. history. Every government, corporation, landlord, and family that has been relying on cheap debt to survive will die. When the #Fed tries to save their lives, it will kill them with #inflation.

Saved - October 15, 2023 at 7:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
America's reckless spending and abandonment of financial constraints have led to a mounting debt crisis. The pandemic further fueled the problem, with the government printing excessive money and manipulating bond rates. Bank of America's massive investment in long-term bonds has left it vulnerable to insolvency. U.S. banks collectively face unrealized losses of $550 billion. Deposit flight from banks has reached unprecedented levels. The federal debt has skyrocketed to $33 trillion, with no end in sight. However, there is hope as short-term Treasuries now offer real yields, providing a defensive option for investors.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

The reckoning begins on Tuesday. For decades, America has lived well beyond its means. The ongoing 50-year deluge of money, credit, and soaring government spending began with Nixon’s repudiation of the gold standardΒ on August 9, 1971.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

America’s experiment with paper money reached its zenith – $7.1 trillion in unfunded government spending – in the insane over-reaction to the flu of 2020.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

Absent financial constraints and protections for property rights, democracies rapidly devolve into competing parasitic factions, each attempting to live at the expense of the β€œother.”  The result is, inevitably, a continuing increase in government spending and government debts.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

During COVID the government printed enormous amounts of money and manipulated bond rates to their lowest point ever. Our banks faced the Hobbesian choice: earn nothing on safe short-term U.S. Treasury notes or earn 1.5% or so on long term U.S. bonds.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

Bank of America made the largest investment in its history. It bought $760 billion of long-term U.S. Treasury bonds and mortgages, with most of the purchases occurring in mid-2020 at the absolute peak in long-term bond prices.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

When Bank of America reports 3Q earnings the losses on these long term bonds will have exceeded its $175 billion in tangible equity capital, meaning any sustained run on its deposits would render it insolvent.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

Through the end of Q2 2023, U.S. banks were sitting on $550 billion in unrealized losses from their holdings of long-duration Treasuries and MBSs. That’s nearly 25% of the total equity capital in the U.S. banking system.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

In the 18 months since the Fed started raising rates in March 2022, depositors have yanked nearly $1 trillion from U.S. banks. Never before in history have we seen deposit flight on this scale.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

U.S. fed debt is now a staggering $33 trillion. That’s up an incredible $10 trillion in the last four years. And the debt bonanza shows no sign of ending. In 2023, the U.S. federal government is on track to run a $2 trillion budget deficit, or 8% of GDP.

@porterstansb - Porter Stansberry

For the first time in 15 years, short-term Treasuries offer a real yield above inflation. Investors are no longer penalized for playing defense. That cash will become worth its weight in gold when this crisis erupts, and world-class businesses trade down to fire sale prices.

Saved - October 15, 2023 at 3:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
US Treasury debt has increased significantly over the past four years, with a deficit of $1.7T as of 9/30. Many expect the deficit to narrow in 2024, but they underestimate the EM nature of the US. Yellen's strategy involves draining RRP instead of bank reserves to manage liquidity. The TGA has increased to $700b, while the Fed's balance sheet has decreased. The deficit would worsen in a recession, crowding out other asset funding. Yellen may accelerate TGA build-up to prepare for recession, elections, and the debt ceiling. Funding through bills shortens UST duration but increases fiscal stress.

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Thread on UST funding and RRP. Backdrop: US treasury debt outstanding has gone from $22.7T to $33.2T over the past four years (9/30/19 to 9/30/23), and 30.9T a year ago. So +$2.3T 1y and +$10T 4y. The -12m deficit is $1.7T per below, as of 9/30 (Treasury is on a Sept FY) 1/18 https://t.co/RRzl9qZNnB

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Many expect this deficit to narrow in 2024 and things to β€œslow down” or stabilize vis-a-vis Treasuries but they simply do not appreciate the EM nature of the US now. 2/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

I was surrounded by bears back in May and maybe the first to say that the β€œliquidity suck” fear (once the debt ceiling was resolved) was overblown because Yellen would call bill auctions and slow-walk the TGA refill by draining RRP instead of bank reserves… 3/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

You have liquidity pumping from TGA drawdown which may end with a debt deal and jar risk a bit (very near term) as Yellen calls a few auctions, but the reaction will be overdone because a bit of RRP drawdown takes care of those, and once corporate tax receipts hit mid June… 2/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

And elaborated here (and subsequently many times) 4/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Ah yes, ink is still drying on Biden’s signature and the histrionic gnashing of teeth about TGA liquidity suck begins. Remember my view - Yellen needs to bridge to 6/15, then slow walks it. RRP draw will help. We get to July without feeling this. 1/ https://t.co/Nuosrq1yj2

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

A review of where we stand vs May (right before debt ceiling resolved): -TGA is $700b vs $50b (+$650b) -Fed b/s is 7.9T vs 8.4T (-$500b) -RRP 1.15T vs 2.25T (-$1.1T) -Bank reserves ~flattish $3.3T 5/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Putting aside reserve identity and eurodollar discussions for a moment. What comes next is much simpler IMO… and once again non-consensus. The Fed must be cognizant of potential bank insolvencies that risk becoming liquidity events like First Republic and SVB. 6/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Treasury is also sensitive to this, and aware that should the US succumb to recession in 1H24, just ahead of an election, that they need to do what they can to have as little impact on the market as possible from the standpoint of *liquidity*. 7/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

The reality is the deficit would blow out in a recession at a time when other countries may not be relied upon to buy more bonds (USD FX/geopolitical reasons). This incremental issuance would crowd out other asset funding. 8/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Yes, UST supply matters. This isn’t 2008 when private assets were levered to the hilt and there wasn’t enough safety paper. There is too much β€˜safety’ paper today vs where Fed induced liquidity still stands. 9/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

There are many who seem to think with TGA now back to $700bn that the liquidity drain hinges on Fed QT dripping lower at $60b/mo. The pre Covid days of $300-400bn TGA are history. Early Trump deficits were almost half what they are today… 10/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

…and Treasury paper outstanding was $10T lower. From a working capital perspective $600-700bn is the new floor. But with recession, the deficit explodes and you also need to raise the TGA in advance of the 1 Jan 2025 debt suspension date. Think about the timing here. 11/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

You can’t watch the Fed do another year of -$60b/mo and take RRP down by ~$720b to $400b at elections because asset mkts could panic by then. And on 1/1/25 you need to be fully loaded on TGA for another mudfight. You’re gonna want to go into ceiling negots with $1.5T+ TGA. 12/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Bank reserves are prob ok down to $2.5T (I have addressed this before here in aggregate). You would think there is ~$800bn room lower here on bank reserves, but not all banks are created equal, and many reserves are in banks that are potentially insolvent. 13/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

My view: banking system gets into β€œ2019 repo trouble” around $2.5T (we can argue $100-200bln here or there among pals). So there is maybe $500bln of room on reserves (still tightening to be sure), and a few hundred yards of room in RRP before crowdouts of CP/paper gets felt. 2/ https://t.co/kcga9mI4TA

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

So why would RRP continue to collapse without bank reserves rising to offset? Because TGA needs to go to $1.5T+ by early 24 so Yellen can draw it in the months leading up to elections (give risk assets/sentiment a shot in the arm) and prepare for recessionary spending… 14/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

…all under the cover of filling her up well ahead of the debt ceiling as a β€œresponsible thing to do.” The least disruptive way to prepare for accelerated disbursement in a recession and the debt ceiling is to *accelerate* the TGA build from here. 15/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Will Yellen actually do this? Who knows. But if you are going to tap the US liquidity pool to prepare for A) recession B) elections C) debt ceiling, you want to do it as soon as possible. 16/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

And the least disruptive way is to fund it out of sequestered reserves (RRP) β€” this leaves the banks out of it. I expect Yellen to double down on the June choice to fund via the bills in coming months. 17/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Of course, this only shortens UST duration and pays the highest funding cost, exacerbating the fiscal stress that will ultimately feed back into a higher required TGA in the future, but that’s the next guy’s problem, isn’t it… /Fin

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 10:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The big banks are already losing a significant amount of money due to the increase in interest rates. However, they are benefiting from the Federal Reserve's BTFP program, which has a potential capacity of up to $2T. Investors are associating these benefits with the big banks, even if they haven't tapped into it yet. The BTFP only covers certain types of securities, and investors are mistakenly assuming it will transform into a TARP-like program if needed. Banks are manipulating their numbers to beat expectations, and investors seem to be happy about it. The reporting season is just beginning, and it will be interesting to see how European banks fare without a BTFP.

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

#JustDarioDaily 🚨THE BIG BANKS ARE ALREADY UTILIZING THE FED BTFP! 🚨 What do $JPM, $C, $WFC, $PNC, $SCHW, $BAC, and $GS have in common at the moment (besides greed)? They are all losing a shit ton of money... The top spot goes to $BAC, currently carrying $135bn "paper losses" in its belly, followed by $C and $WFC, both at around $100bn. True, these losses are only due to the increase in interest rates, and the US will never default on its debt (because if it does, we go back to barter). Hence, these are "paper losses," and banks are in great shape, right! Well... thanks to the FED's "virtual bailout," better known as the BTFP program they are already benefiting from… Wait what? Yes sir! Why am I saying that the big banks are already utilizing the #BTFP? Am I nuts? No, I am not, and I will explain why. Because of the #BTFP potential total capacity of up to $2T, investors are already associating its benefits with the big banks, even if they are not tapping into it (yet). Wait a second, doesn't the #BTFP expire in 5 months? Well... if Jerome Burns wants the world to keep believing the #FED will maintain rates "higher for longer," he has no alternative but to extend the duration of the program, making it "temporarily permanent," just like they did for Quantitative Easing before (for example). The FED enjoys keeping its cake and eating it too, so rest assured their habits will not change. 😌 There is a problem, though. The #BTFP only covers US Treasuries, Agencies, and Government Guaranteed MBS. Here is where investors are making a big (big) mistake. ⚠️They are assuming that if the time comes, the "BTFP cocoon" will transform into a "TARP butterfly"! πŸ› This is the only rational explanation for the market willingly ignoring what's going on in the Credit space, starting from Commercial Real Estate, and not "punishing" the Big Banks for the ridiculously low Credit Loss Provisions they booked for Q3. Another sign of this general thought lies in Credit Spreads across all rating spectrums "refusing" to increase. [https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1713812823938384383?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA…]. πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ Banks are as smart as foxes, and they have seized the opportunity. Have you noticed that Credit Loss Provisions for Q3 are consistently lower than Q2 for all the banks that reported so far, despite the increase in Non-Performing Loans (and a general skyrocketing of Chapter 11 filings)? While before, I felt a bit lonely, I have to admit that now it is so obvious that banks are "twisting" the numbers so much to "beat expectations" that they are at odds with the reality everyone can observe. Although we cannot blame them too much when the government, which should police them, is doing exactly the same. πŸ™ˆ So here we are today, with banks faking their numbers in plain sight, and investors being happy about that. πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ In just a few decades, we have literally moved from the concept of an "Intelligent Investor" to an "Ignorant Investor." The reporting season is only beginning, and I am particularly curious to see how European banks will fare, starting from UB-C-S 😬, and how they will manage to hide the even bigger losses government bonds are digging into their HTM books. Notice I said "losses" and not "paper losses" because in Europe, they don't have a BTFP (yet). Considering the outrageously high inflation in a contingent that is barely growing its GDP, it will be very hard for politicians to endorse another inflative Central Bank weapon of mass wealth destruction. πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentioned that further signs of improvement are needed before reducing the stimulus. They highlighted that economic growth in Q1 was driven by increased demand from US households and businesses, offsetting the decline in government spending. However, the job market remains weak, with high unemployment rates and a decrease in labor force participation. Currently, the central bank is injecting $85 billion into the economy each month to keep borrowing costs low and stimulate investment, hiring, and economic growth. Although consumer spending is increasing, more actions are required.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They will need to see further signs of improvement before easing off on that stimulus. He told the congressional joint economic committee Speaker 1: Economic growth in the Q1 was supported by continuing expansion in demand by US households and businesses, which more than offset the drag from declines in government spending, especially defense spending. Despite this improvement, the job market remains weak overall. The The unemployment rate is still well above its longer run normal level. Rates of long term unemployment are historically high, and the labor force participation rate has continued to move Move down. Speaker 0: The central bank's currently pumping $85,000,000,000 into the economy each month by buying treasury and mortgage bonds. That's to keep borrowing costs low and encourage investment, hiring, and economic growth. But Anke as it is working with consumer spending rising on things like cars and housing, but more is needed.

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

What I find incredible in the current market froth with risk from every direction and with bankruptcies heading to nosebleed levels is that Credit Spreads are still at β€œnormal” long term trend level πŸ€” Well below 2020 Covid crash and miles away from GFC peaks So puzzling… πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

SPEAKING OF THE DEVIL….. πŸ‘€

@CapitalcomAU - Capital.com Australia

SINGAPORE TO INSPECT CREDIT SUISSE, OTHERS IN $2B SCANDAL

Saved - November 23, 2023 at 4:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Breaking: US Treasury Bond Market in Crisis Implications: Investors face total losses, eroding confidence in the financial system. Economic crisis looms, jeopardizing the dollar's reserve status. Banking collapse threatens savings and triggers bail-ins. Policy chaos ensues as the Federal Reserve and global central banks face turmoil. Market instability looms, disrupting debt markets and interbank lending. Janet Yellen hints at a significant event. A UBS bond's Cusip ID has been "deleted" before settlement. Bonds seemingly evade default through deletion.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

🚨Breaking: The US Treasury Bond Market In The Red What are the implications? Investors Losses: Well anyone holding US debt would suffer total losses, including central banks, pension funds, governments etc. This would destroy confidence in the financial system. Is this still a November To remember? Everyone who has been asking about 401ks or retirement here is your answer. Well let's see my fellow compatriots. S Economic Crisis: The US government's ability to fund operations and debt would be crippled, undermining the dollar's reserve status. This could cause a deep recession or depression. Remember we are going on the Gold Standard. The dollar has to lose value in order for the Iraqi Dinar to become atleast 1:1. This is about currency parity. Equal playing field. Banking collapse: Banks hold huge Treasury reserves - deleting this asset base would trigger bank failures, bail-ins, and potentially wipe out savings. Which is why I told you all to put your money in Basel 3 Compliant banks for months. Which is why I said certain banks do not have until 2025 to implement ISO-20022. I stand by that. This is not an olive basket. 2025 is for those banks left over. Policy Chaos - The Federal Reserve and central banks worldwide would be thrown into chaos as a core pillar of global finance vanished. Emergency measures will not do them any justice in this case. Why do you think I have been constantly telling you all that the US Treasury have been running things? This situation was planned. How? Devolution. Where have you heard over the years that gold will end the Federal Reserve? Market Instability - Taking the world's benchmark risk-free asset off the books would ofcourse massively disrupt debt markets and interbank lending, creating extreme volatility. US Treasurys are considered the safest asset out there. They are foundation that the whole house of cards is built on. If you remove that foundation, the stability of all the markets gonna come crumbling down understand? People that countdown on this website (https://qofficial.net/password) is looking really interesting right about now. Especially if this goes through as Janet Yellen has implied. A week to remember? It's definitely looking like this. Because remember some weeks back I told you all the 1st domino for the public would be this month? What have I been wrong about this far? I will post the document below.

Coming soon | Q This website is coming soon. qofficial.net

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

https://x.com/DarioCpx/status/1727104700531785820?s=20

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

⚠️ANOTHER ONE FOR THE #DTCC β€œWEIRDER THINGS” RECORDS ⚠️ According to this note below, the Cusip ID of a UBS bond due to settle tomorrow has been β€œdeleted” 🀨 So now bonds don’t default anymore because they will be deleted before failing to settle? πŸ˜† https://t.co/iDSYeoyEVc

Saved - November 27, 2023 at 10:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In this analysis, I examine the risk of banks going bust in a liquidity crisis. I include both US and European banks, focusing on their loan-to-deposit ratios and the impact of illiquid assets on their financial health. The findings reveal alarming trends, with some banks lending more than their deposits and holding highly illiquid assets. Traditional capital ratios and risk metrics are deemed useless in assessing banks' health. I present two scenarios, highlighting banks at high risk of insolvency. Off-balance sheet items are not considered, but their inclusion would likely weaken some banks further. It's crucial to understand that during a financial crisis, all assets suffer losses, while liabilities are only affected after bankruptcy.

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

#JustDarioDaily 🚨 WHICH BANKS ARE AT RISK OF GOING BUST IN A LIQUIDITY CRISIS BECAUSE ALREADY (RIDICULOUSLY) INSOLVENT? 🚨 Thank you for waiting, but I assure you what follows isn't going to disappoint you! 😁 Two months ago in "This time is NOT different - Part 2," I flagged how my analysis at that time flashed (big) red warnings on several US banks (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1706274260489228552?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA). My analysis today will expand on the methodology presented (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1706274251727409331?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA) to include the following points: 1 - I will now include the largest European banks. Consequently, I reclassified their figures to harmonize all the datasets on US reporting. In particular, with regards to Available For Sale (AFS) and Hold To Maturity (HTM) securities. 2 - All values presented are in $USD. Non-USD figures have been converted using the 30th September FX rate for consistency. 3 - Shareholders' Equity is considered in its entirety. Now that the stage is set, the show can begin! 🎬 ⚠️ LOAN / DEPOSIT RATIO A L/D ratio above 90% is already a warning sign, but there are 2 banks that managed to lend more than the deposits they collected! (Table 1) ⚠️ [LOAN + HTM] / DEPOSIT RATIO HTM books are now officially "Hide to maturity" and stuffed with assets trading at a significant loss because of high interest rates (and soon high credit losses too). Not only banks cannot afford to sell those securities, but trading at such a discount to the par value, they even stop being collateral-worthy. Effectively, the risk of those books is now equivalent to the loan ones. Furthermore, bear in mind there is no #BTFP in Europe, while in the US, that only applies to US Treasuries or government-guaranteed securities. Now, check how many banks hold more highly illiquid assets than the deposits they collected...(table 2) I feel now the warning bells in your head are already pretty loud πŸ˜‚ ⚠️ [LOAN + HTM + AFS] / DEPOSIT RATIO AFS securities aren't Marked to Market but booked according to their "fair value." Translated, their real value in the market is lower due to a lack of liquidity. Now, check how many banks cannot cover their deposits if we include the AFS assets in the analysis... (table 3) I bet now those bells in your head turned into a Marilyn Manson concert! 🀣 At this point, I hope you agree with me that all those capital ratios and risk metrics the regulators use to assess banks' health are completely useless. As a matter of fact, banks that went bust always had "strong capital" according to the regulatory metrics, from #CreditSuisse (recently) to #Lehman in 2008. Fyi, both banks imploded with an "A" rating! πŸ™ˆ 🚨 Alright, now is time for fireworks! 🚨 In the last table, I present two scenarios on the current state of banks’ books: 1 - "La La Land" that only assumes 5% losses on loans, 10% on HTM, and 2.5% on AFS books and compares those with the bank's total equity. 2 - β€œSoft Landing" that assumes 7.5% losses on loans, 20% on HTM, and 5% on AFS books. I wanted to include a "Realistic" one, but my heart ❀️ couldn't bear it, sorry. πŸ₯²πŸ™πŸ» Feel free to play with the data and see what happens if you assumes realistic losses.. Considering how twisted the reality we are living in is, I used green crayons to mark all those banks that have high chance of being already insolvent in the β€œridiculous” scenarios presented. 🀭 ⚠️Important to bear in mind is this analysis only considers on-balance sheet items to limit its complexity. However, if we bring in off-balance sheet items I strongly doubt banks like $BAC , $UBS and $HSBC will come up so strong as per previous detailed analysis I posted… Beware, during a financial crisis, all the assets, including "cash and equivalents," suffer a haircut while liabilities only get a haircut πŸ’‡ after a company files for Chapter 11. This means that the chances for the assets I left out to be able to increase in value during a crash to compensate for the calculated losses are close to zero. THE END πŸŽ‡πŸŽ†

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

⚠️ This Time Is NOT Different, Keep An Eye On $FIZN , $SCHW and $WFC πŸ‘€ ⚠️ #JustDarioDaily - #BankingCrisis Update - Part of 2/2 🧡  I've taken the US banks with assets above $200 billion, and from their latest 10-Q reports for Q2-23, I've extracted the following key data: Net…

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

⚠️ This Time Is NOT Different, Keep An Eye On $FIZN , $SCHW and $WFC πŸ‘€ ⚠️ #JustDarioDaily - #BankingCrisis Update - Part 1/2 🧡  During the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), banks got a little carried away, right? Looking at the Loans/Deposits ratio, a fundamental and powerful…

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

🍿 POPCORN ALERT 🍿 This weekend I am going through the financial reports belonging to the 32 largest banks between US and Europe, can hardly hold back my excitement for what I found halfway through it πŸ˜† Stay tuned https://t.co/Fqj22QkfiK

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 1:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Reverse Repo Facility is a crucial part of the overnight lending market. It involves repurchase agreements between banks and the Fed. When banks need cash, they sell US Treasuries to the Fed and buy them back later at a slightly higher price. This is called a repo. On the other hand, in a reverse repo, banks buy US Treasuries from the Fed to generate a rate of return on excess cash. The NY Fed sets the Reverse Repo Rate, which is currently 5.30%. Recently, the focus has shifted to the Reverse Repo market as banks are swimming in excess cash. This is due to the massive injection of liquidity through QE. However, the Treasury has been draining the Reverse Repo Facility by auctioning short-term T-Bills. As the facility approaches zero, the Treasury may need to explore other options, such as adjusting capital requirements or modifying collateral rules, to fund its increasing debt. The future of the Reverse Repo Facility remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the government's spending will continue, leading to the need for more money printing.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Reverse Repo Facility Lots of talk about how it's dwindling fast and may soon be empty...but does it really matter? Yes, it matters. A whole lot more than you may think. Time for a Fed πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@jameslavish - James Lavish

🎯 Repo vs Reverse Repo What are they, and what're their differences? Put simply, they are two overnight lending markets run by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) All purchases and sales (open market operations) are made by the NY Fed Open Market Trading Desk (the Desk)

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Repo A repo is basically a repurchase agreement between two parties The term can be used in many different types of transactions, but we most often hear it used to describe overnight transactions of US Treasuries.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

See, when a bank needs cash to cover short term obligations, it can sell USTs to the Fed (in return for cash) agreeing to buy them back just 24 to 48 hours later at a slightly higher price This is called a Repo or 'Repurchase Agreement'.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The difference between the amount of cash the bank receives and the amount it pays back is calculated to be the 'discount rate', or the cost of β€˜overnight’ borrowing from the Fed It looks like this: https://t.co/mMSl0WtUDG

@jameslavish - James Lavish

So, if there is a lack of liquidity in the system, banks may be looking to loan their US Treasuries to the Fed for cash to cover short-term needs Got it.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But what if there's too much cash in the system, and banks who are looking to generate interest on that cash aren't able to buy any more USTs, because they're at their internal and/or Fed-mandated limits? Well, that's where the *Reverse* Repurchase Agreement comes into play.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Reverse Repo Much like the repo transaction, where a bank sells US Treasuries to the Fed, in a *Reverse Repo*, the bank buys US Treasuries from the Fed But why would they do this?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Simple. When a bank has too much cash on its balance sheet, it can utilize the reverse repo to generate a rate of return on that cash in the overnight market In essence, the bank *parks* its cash at the Fed.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And so, like a mirror image of the repo, the Reverse Repo looks like this: https://t.co/NJKm720KfC

@jameslavish - James Lavish

An important key here is that the NY Fed sets the Reverse Repo Rate And as you can see here, the rate is currently 5.30% Remember this number, we will come back to it in a bit. https://t.co/PodJOt5U1H

@jameslavish - James Lavish

πŸ” Filling the RRF Another thing you may have noticed recently is that we are hearing precisely nothing about the Repo market lately Why? Because virtually nobody is using it. https://t.co/YxRodee6Zw

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The reason for this is that the major banks are not strapped for cash, but rather swimming in it And so, all the focus and action has been in the Reverse Repo markets But how did this happen? Why are these banks swimming in, stuffed to the gills with, all this cash?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

You got it QE (almost infinity) in 2020 and 2021 See, when the Treasury and the Fed teamed up to 'inject liquidity' into the markets, they hit the banks with something of a cash tidal wave.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Turns out that when you print and purchase over $5.8T of securities from banks and put those securities on your own balance sheet in return for floods of cash... https://t.co/TEEfxWcaFr

@jameslavish - James Lavish

...you wind up creating massive excess cash balances at the banks, who then in turn, wind up eventually parking it back at The Fed in the Reverse Repo Facility. Look at what also happened between 2021 and the end of 2022: https://t.co/oNnn2PaQaQ

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Fed then pays the bank the current Fed Fund influenced Reverse Repo Rate as a yield on those balances Which, as you can see the Reverse Repo Operations Schedule above, is 5.30% (annualized) yield this week What a deal!

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But that $2.4T of Reverse Repo Facility balances has been falling recently and is now down quite a bit. But why? Where's all the excess cash going?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

✍️ Draining the RRF Again, unless you've been completely ignoring all news and media (good for you, seriously), then you've likely also noticed that there's been quite a bit of talk about the expanding US deficit and ballooning US debt this year.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

This phenomenon is called the Debt Spiral, and it's apparent mathematically that we have already entered one If you want to know more about that you can read all about it in a thread posted over a year ago, right here: https://x.com/jameslavish/status/1562078782453792768?s=20

@jameslavish - James Lavish

If you’ve never heard of a *debt spiral*, it’s time you did, and ask the question, "is the US already in one?" Let’s dig in and answer that. A debt πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Bottom line, the US is spending too much compared to the amount of productivity and taxes it is (read: its citizens and companies are) generating, and this excess spending is causing the need for the Treasury to borrow more and more... ...and more.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

So, they've been covering the deficit with auction after auction of bonds, just papering over the spending problem. https://t.co/RRfIHnTzdu

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But because interest rates are now significantly higher than when the Treasury started to flood the market with USTs, they've been leaning hard on the short end of the yield curve Notice the steep pickup in T-Bill issuance this year, surpassing even the shock of March 2020: https://t.co/zqaVwR99T2

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Treasury has pivoted to short-term T-Bill auctions for two reasons 1) To avoid locking into long-term high interest rates which would exacerbate the deficit and interest expense 2) They can tease capital back out of the Reverse Repo with yields slightly higher than 5.3%

@jameslavish - James Lavish

So, how are they doing with that plan? It seems swimmingly well In fact, the Treasury has drained ~$1.5T from the Reverse Repo Facility in just the last few months. https://t.co/ncPorAlOB5

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Treasury's Q4 refunding plan reiterated they would continue this, and they're OK with staying well above a normal ratio of ~20% T-Bills and 80% Bonds In fact, the Treasury has effectively inverted this ratio, auctioning ~65% T-bills and ~35% Bonds this past year.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Using the Treasury estimated $1.5T+ of upcoming auctions between now and the end of the first quarter of 2024, it seems the Reverse Repo will soon be drained But if the Treasury keeps the same pace of auctions as the last couple of months, the RRF could be drained by January.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Either way, it appears that is the direction the Treasury is headed, and the RRF will, in fact, soon be back to zero Then, the only backstop is investors continuing to move cash into money markets because of attractive yields But when rates start to fall, then what?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

🧠 Where will the Treasury Turn? With the gov't running $2T annual federal deficits, the Treasury simply cannot stop issuing debt And this is *before we hit a recession* and the deficits *increase*.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Where will the Treasury turn for even *more* capital? Can they just issue longer term bonds instead?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

If you've been following me, you know that the last Treasury 30-yr bond auction was abysmal, signaling a steep drop-off in demand and confidence in long-term US Treasuries If you've not yet read about that, you can find a thread on it right here: https://x.com/jameslavish/status/1724541356113264691?s=20

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Abysmal. Disastrous. Catastrophic. All terms you may have heard describing the most recent US Treasury Bond auction. But how bad was it? Did it really almost fail? Time for a Treasury πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

@jameslavish - James Lavish

TL;DR: international and institutional demand fell off a cliff this past auction, and the Treasury may have difficulty growing the sizes of auctions necessary to meet demand when they need to move further out on the yield curve.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

When the Reverse Repo Facility is drained and the Treasury can no longer use that excess capital to fund additional debt, they may have to turn to more drastic measures, such as...

@jameslavish - James Lavish

β€’ Adjusting Capital Requirements The Fed and regulatory agencies could lower the capital requirements for banks This means banks would need to hold less capital against certain assets, freeing up more funds for investment, including in longer-term Treasury bonds.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

β€’ Modifying Collateral Rules The Fed could alter the rules regarding what types of collateral can be used in various Fed lending facilities, which might encourage more purchases of Treasury bonds.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

β€’ Tweaking Regs Regulatory changes could be made that *require* financial institutions to hold more long-term Treasuries I.e., changes could be made to the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) requirements to encourage or require holding longer-term government securities.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Additional options may include some sort of stealth injection of capital into banks or the markets in order to ensure sufficient liquidity for debt auctions Think: four letter acronyms like the BTFP or similar programs they can and I expect they will implement.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Then, of course, we have the upcoming 2024 Treasury Regular Buyback Program What this is and how it will be used remains to be seen, but this could act as a quasi-yield curve control or *stealth QE program* We will see...

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Any way you cut it, the RRF lifeline is dwindling and soon ending Your guess as to where the Treasury turns and what exactly they end up doing is as good as mine, but I watching Treasury auctions and the debt markets carefully.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Because one thing we can be absolutely sure of... The government is not going to stop or even slow down spending any time soon, and they will eventually have little choice but to print more money.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And then? The Reverse Repo Facility will just be filled right back up again. What a deal, indeed.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

This thread is a summary of a recent issue of πŸ’‘The Informationist, the free newsletter that simplifies one financial concept for you weekly. You can join 25K readers here: http://jameslavish.com https://t.co/Ad4cmlVj29

Saved - December 3, 2023 at 11:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Reserve and the banking system face a potential credit implosion due to changes in collateral requirements. US Treasury bonds no longer serve as global reserve assets, impacting the value of America's debt. The Fed's reverse repo, which values their collateral (mortgage-backed securities), is being drained by G-SIB banks. Once the reverse repo is depleted, the Fed's collateral becomes valueless. The unwinding of the US Treasury bond carry trade further exacerbates the situation. The Fed's inability to go into quantitative easing (QE) adds to the risk. ISO 20022 and Basel III regulations also play a role. The article suggests that the Fed's future is uncertain and highlights the need for the US to find alternative solutions in trade and economic policies.

@MikeCristo8 - MikeCristo8

🚨🚨🚨WOULD I LIE TO YOU ABOUT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BLOWING UP NEXT WEEK ??🚨🚨🚨 🚨I want to clarify the plumbing of the Fed & G-SIB’s to show impending credit implosion of both the Fed and the banking system🚨 🚨🚨The reason why the banks will collapse next week, is because the U.S. Treasury bond no longer meets the collateral requirements for tier 1 capital. 🚨🚨U.S. Treasury bonds no longer serve as the (global reserve asset) collateral that trades oil to value America’s debt. The Federal Reserve’s ($2.3t) reverse repo is credit (the Feds liability) that values the Feds collateral (their asset), which are mortgage-backed securities (once valued at $2.3t). FOOTNOTE: the Feds asset, MBS was $2.3t against the Fed’s liability ($2.3t reverse repo which is the credit the Fed themselves created). The Reverse Repo is Now $768bn. The Feds reverse repo are the G-SIB’s bank reserves or assets which are held at the Fed via the reverse repo. The G-SIB’s are draining their bank reserves from the Fed’s reverse repo which is the Fed’s liability (the $2.3t original credit created) for lifting the mortgage-backed securities from the G-SIB’s balance sheet. Once the G-SIB’s drain the Fed’s reverse repo (their bank reserves held at the Fed), There is no credit (liability side) with which to value the Fed’s collateral which are the mortgage-backed securities. Credit values the asset Once the credit (G-SIB’s bank reserves) is drained, What I’m saying is the Fed’s collateral, the mortgage-backed securities will become valueless because the Fed’s credit account (the liability side) has been drained. The U.S. Treasury bond (dollar trade) is being unwound. The G-SIB’s liabilities are the deposits that funded U.S. Treasury bonds through the corporate bond market. Under Basel III regulations, the U.S. Treasury bond is no longer considered tier 1 collateral (bank assets) to their balance sheet that hedges against a banks liabilities. The U.S. Treasury bond carry trade is being unwound which is draining the reverse repo. Once the reverse repo is drained, remember they are bank reserves (a bank asset), Once the reverse repo is drained, the G-SIB banks have no more assets, and the Federal Reserve no longer has a liability side (which is the credit) that values the mortgage-backed securities on the Federal Reserves balance sheet which is the collateral. If the G-SIB banks have no more assets (the reverse repo i.e. bank reserves), to hedge against their collapsing liabilities (U.S. Treasury bond unwind), the G-SIB banks blow up. The Fed is forbidden from going into QE, so there will be no more credit (Fed liability/revers repo) with which to value the collateral (mortgage-backed securities) on the Feds balance sheet. Why would the Federal Reserve allow the G-SIB’s to drain from the reverse repo (which are really bank reserves/assets) against the collateral (MBS, held at the Fed) if the Fed can just go into QE. Part II below (very important) ALSO see my 2:37PM tweet from yesterday. @BossBlunts1 finally figured out some. Banks will have ZERO liquidity by next Friday as the reverse repo will be sucked dry. @BillAckman @sama @JoeBiden @JeffBezos @satyanadella @RobertDowneyJr @gdb @joerogan @FT @WSJ @Forbes @elerianm @BarackObama @unusual_whales @MattWallace888 @KimDotcom @marcorubio @HawleyMO @tedcruz @marklevinshow @gurgavin @MarioNawfal @AOC @MarioNawfal @spectatorindex @TheInsiderPaper @GoldTelegraph_ @thesiriusreport @Prolotario1 @stillgray @disclosetv @htsfhickey @JackStr42679640 @KobeissiLetter @DougAMacgregor @ParikPatelCFA @KanekoaTheGreat @TuckerCarlson @JackFarley96 @TaraBull808 @AltcoinGordon @alx @davidbelle_ @fejau_inc @jsolomonReports @PeterSchiff @PrestonPysh @davidicke @balajis

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

BANK LIQUIDITY IS BEING MASSIVELY IMPACTED DUE TO THE FED'S CONCURRENT QT AND QE. THEY CANT PRINT MONEY INTO AND SUCK MONEY OUT OF THE MONETARY SYSTEM AT THE SAME TIME AND EXPECT ANYTHING MORE THAN AN ARTIFICIAL PUMP OF GDP WITH LONG TERM STICKY INFLATION AND FURTHER DEVALUATION OF THE USD TO END THEIR PONZI SCHEME THAT IS THE FIAT. LINK TO VIDEO EXPOUNDING ON THE RRP COLLAPSE, HOUSING, BANK LIABILITIES, AND POOR STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK: 🚨πŸ”₯https://youtu.be/gCikvMLLsbQ?si=cPO20qHT7-DfqVov πŸ”₯🚨

@MikeCristo8 - MikeCristo8

(Part II) ANSWER; ISO 20022 prevents the Fed from ever doing QE again. The G7 Central Banks Are going down. Why isn’t the macro establishment NOT talking about this very important detail? It really may be over for the Fed next week! Because liability (credit) the G-SIB’s issued to value the U.S. Treasury bond asset(s) is being undone due to Basel III and ISO 20022. What do you think the MBS is backed by? The β€œliability” credit (the reverse repo) the Fed created. When the reverse repo is drained, the MBS will be backed β€œby nothing at all” And you can talk yourselves until your blue in the face But that’s how central bank plumbing works. America has to win on every trade deal, and so the U.S. policy is to control other countries by war, because the U.S. can’t win a trade war or run serial trade deficits because it’s deindustrialized and the U.S. Dollar no longer trades global oil. The BRICS solution to the U.S. Trade war is to offer mutual gain, collectivism, and mutual trade. The U.S. empire can only survive by sucking value out of the reset of the world. Which it can no longer do. Because U.S. Treasury bonds no longer serve as the collateral that trades oil to value America’s debt. enjoy your weekend everyone! @BillAckman @sama @JoeBiden @JeffBezos @satyanadella @RobertDowneyJr @gdb @joerogan @FT @WSJ @Forbes @elerianm @BarackObama @unusual_whales @MattWallace888 @KimDotcom @marcorubio @HawleyMO @tedcruz @marklevinshow @gurgavin @MarioNawfal @AOC @MarioNawfal @spectatorindex @TheInsiderPaper @GoldTelegraph_ @thesiriusreport @Prolotario1 @stillgray @disclosetv @htsfhickey @BossBlunts1 @JackStr42679640 @KobeissiLetter @DougAMacgregor @ParikPatelCFA @KanekoaTheGreat @TuckerCarlson @JackFarley96 @TaraBull808 @AltcoinGordon @alx @davidbelle_ @fejau_inc @jsolomonReports @PeterSchiff @PrestonPysh @davidicke @balajis

Saved - December 7, 2023 at 6:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Banks urgently borrowed $200 million through the overnight repo facility, the highest since COVID-19 began. This signals a massive need for cash to prevent margin calls. Money market fund usage collapsed, with excess cash dropping below $800 billion. Bank usage of repo skyrocketed, indicating overleveraging and under-capitalization. Both trends are bearish, leading to liquidity issues, margin calls, fire sales, and surging heavily shorted assets like precious metals and meme stocks.

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

EMERGENCY 🚨 BANKS BORROWED $200 MILLION IN OVERNIGHT REPO FACILITY‼️ πŸ™Š THIS IS THE HIGHEST REPO SINCE THE ONSET OF COVID SHUTDOWNS AND SIGNALS A MASSIVE NEED FOR CASH TO PREVENT MARGIN CALLS FROM 0 TO $200 MILLION OVERNIGHT πŸ“‰ REVERSE REPO: MONEY MARKET FUND USAGE COLLAPSING AS EXCESS CASH PLUMMETED TO UNDER $800 BILLION πŸ“ˆ REPO (NOT REVERSE): BANK USAGE ROCKETED, INDICATING WITHOUT A DOUBT THAT BANKS ARE OVERLEVERAGED AND UNDER-CAPITALIZED πŸ™‰ BOTH ARE CORRELATED IN OPPOSITE WAYS. DECREASE IN REVERSE REPO IS BEARISH. INCREASE IN REPO IS BEARISH. BOTH HAVE BEEN OCCURING EXACTLY AS PREDICTED. CALL YOUR PARENTS 😬 LACK OF LIQUIDITY LEADS TO MARGIN CALLS, FIRE SALES OF BLUE CHIP STOCKS AND BONDS, AND SKYROCKETING OF HEAVILY SHORTED EQUITIES AND ASSETS SUCH AS PRECIOUS METALS, MEME STOCKS, INVERSE ETF'S AND INDEXES. #amc #gme #silver #gold #uvxy #vix #sqqq #vvix #sjim #bbbyq

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

BREAKING 🚨 REVERSE REPO OPERATIONS TODAY FELL OVER $100 BILLION‼️ MONEY MARKET (MUTUAL) FUNDS AND BANKS USE THE REPO/REVERSE REPO TO STASH CASH IN HIGHLY LIQUID US TREASURY NOTES. THIS ALLOWS THEM TO RECEIVE THE FED FUNDS RATE + 0.05% APR IN OVERNIGHT LOANS IN EXCHANGE FOR T BILLS AND DO THE OPPOSITE THE FOLLOWING DAY. THE FED HAS IMPLEMENTED NEW INCREASED INITIAL MARGIN REQUIREMENTS THAT HAVE RAISED THE MINIMUM CAPITAL LEVEL REQ'D FOR AMERICA'S TOP FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. AS LIQUIDITY IS SUCKED OUT OF THE SYSTEM BY THE #RRP, THIS LEAVES BANKS WITH LESS CAPITAL WITH WHICH TO MEET #MARGIN COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS. THIS HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CAUSE A FIRE SALE OF ASSETS SHOULD THE BANKS BE MARGIN CALLED BY THE DTC, OCC, NSCC, etc, AND/OR THE HEDGE FUNDS & FAMILY OFFICES TO WHICH SAID BANKS LEND SHARES & CASH TO BE MARGIN CALLED BY THEIR PRIME BROKER (BANK). WE ARE SEEING THE BEGINNINGS OF A LIQUIDITY CRISIS MEANWHILE THE FED HAS ONLY UNWOUND 10% OF THEIR #MBS VALUED OVER $2.7 TRILLION. A HOUSING CORRECTION HAS BEGUN AS NEW HOME SALE PRICES ARE DOWN 20% YoY, EXISTING HOME SALE NUMBERS HAVE COLLAPSED TO 2009 LEVELS, AND EXISTING HOME SUPPLY HAS JUST BEGUN TO INCREASE. BANKS HAVE A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL MBS AND A VALUE AT RISK FOR THE TOP 4 U.S. BANKS OF OVER $719 BILLION. MEANWHILE GOLDMAN HAS 45% OF THEIR DEPOSITS UNINSURED BY THE FDIC, AND JPMORGAN 55% UNINSURED. THEYRE ALL BETTING ON A FEDERALLY FUNDED BAILOUT WITH YOUR MONEY IN THE FACE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF THE WORST RECESSION AND STAGFLATION THIS COUNTRY HAS EVER SEEN DUE TO THE PONZI SCHEME THAT IS EXACERBATED BY THE RECORD LEVEL OF C19 MONEY PRINTING BAILOUTS GIVEN TO INSTITUTIONS IN 2020 IN RESPONSE TO THE COLLAPSE OF THE #RRP ON SEPT 19, 2019 WHEN THE FED HAD TO TAKE OVER THE REPO OPERATIONS TO PREVENT A FULL BLOWN #STOCKMARKET COLLAPSE AT THAT TIME‼️ THESE ARE THE DEATH THROES OF A MONETARY SYSTEM PONZI SCHEME THAT WILL HAVE AN INEVITABLE IMPACT ON THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND ALL OF OUR FINANCES, EVEN IF INVISIBLE AT FIRST GLANCE MUCH LIKE THE INFLATION OF THE LAST 2 YEARS. SILVER LINING? HEAVILY SHORTED STOCKS, FUNDS, AND PRECIOUS METALS TEND TO πŸš€ IN TIMES LIKE THIS. I.E. #VW, #GOLD, #SILVER, #VIX ETC IN OCT 2008 & ONWARDS JUST 13 DAYS AFTER THE WORST DAYS IN #SP500 HISTORY SAW A 13% LOSS ON A SINGLE DAY. #AMC #GAMESTOP #PSLV #SILVER #GOLD #VIX #UVXY #MINERS #HYMC #SLV #SPROTT #PRECIOUSMETALS

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 10:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2024, the "hide till maturity" trick used by banks to avoid losses on underwater assets may hit a maturity wall. If forced to sell these assets before maturity or if they mature without full repayment, losses become real. The Fed's #BTFP helped banks in 2023, but the second weakness of this trick remains a problem. The US Treasury Department will compete to raise trillions of dollars while private corporate debt matures, potentially causing a crisis in commercial real estate. The NBER estimates that 14.3% of CRE loans are in negative equity, and banks may face over $100 billion in losses. The financial system has many other problems that cannot be solved by rate cuts or money printing. The debt hangover after the bullish year for stocks in 2024 may be brutal.

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

#JustDarioDaily 🚨 2024 - THE YEAR WHEN THE "HIDE TILL MATURITY" TRICK HITS THE MATURITY WALL AND BREAKS? πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ 🚨 During 2023, we have discussed so often how (ridiculously insolvent) banks have made extensive use of "Hold To Maturity" accounting to the point that it is now more appropriate to rename it "Hide Till Maturity" (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1728786228211015966?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA). Dump any asset with a market value implying a steep loss in the HTM books, and the loss is "gone". However, this trick has two significant weaknesses: 1 - If you are forced to sell the underwater assets in HTM books before maturity, then the loss turns from "paper" into "real". 2 - If the asset matures, hence ceases to be eligible for HTM accounting, and the principal isn't repaid in full, then the paper loss becomes a real one again. In 2023, the FED took care of the first weakness with the #BTFP (non-bailout πŸ˜‰) that effectively allowed banks in liquidity crisis to borrow against the nominal value of their US Treasuries rather than the market one, dodging a forced selling that would have likely triggered a domino of regional bank bankruptcies. As I explained in a post almost 3 months ago (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1714455707003830741?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA), big banks too are benefiting from the #BTFP, which is why the only scenario in which this program isn't extended this coming March is the one where the #FED led by Jerome Burns goes totally out of its mind. πŸ™„ The second weakness, greatly ignored by #FOMO #stocks investors, not only is about to become a major issue but is also a problem that the #FED and other Central Banks cannot tackle, avoiding the "bailout" shame. Good luck putting together another official financial system bailout in a big election year, not only in the #US but also in other G7 countries like #Japan and the #UK. ⚠️ BEWARE - #FED CUTTING RATES DOESN'T FIX A BORROWER'S INSOLVENCY PROBLEM BECAUSE ITS PROBLEM IS NOT THE COST OF *FUTURE* DEBT BUT THE DEBT *ALREADY* ACCUMULATED. In 2024, you will have the US Treasury Department competing in the open market to raise Trillions of $USD (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1723825931503194398?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA), at the same time when 5+ Trillion $USD [Picture 1] of private corporate debt (bond + loans) matures, and, as if this wasn't already enough, a lot of this private debt is going to be impossible to refinance because no one wants to be that last bag holder of a zombie company without the guarantee of a publicly sponsored TARP-like bailout fund. Simplifying all in a sentence: the "hide till maturity" trick is about to hit the (debt) maturity wall, literally speaking. 🫣 Which sector is the one likely to implode first? Commercial Real Estate. The National Bureau of Economic Research estimates just released in December [Picture 2] portray a situation beyond horrible and now hard to ignore for Banks like they did before (post in quote below). According to the NBER, 14.3% of CRE loans are in NEGATIVE EQUITY status. Many of the remaining ones are expected to face cash flow and refinancing issues due to the high Loan-To-Value in place (average 80%) and almost double debt costs in the current interest rate environment. At ~14% default rate, US banks already face more than 100bn$ of losses according to the NBER [Picture 3]. How to solve the issue then if #Fed rate cuts are useless here? The NBER suggests: "A near-term solution could consider a market-based recapitalization of the U.S. banking system" [Picture 4]. Translated: BANKS NEED A BAILOUT πŸ™„ We know that CRE is only the tip of the iceberg of the financial system problems. Credit Cards debt, buy now pay later consumer loans, student debt, and on and on. The list is pretty long, and none of these issues can be fixed with either a rate cut or money printing because capital is all that matters to sustain credit losses and avoid insolvency materializing into bankruptcy. Perhaps 2024 will be another irrationally exuberant #bullish year for #stocks, but once the party ends, because for sure it will, the β€œdebt hangover” this time around will be brutal.

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

#JustDarioDaily 🚨 WHICH BANKS ARE AT RISK OF GOING BUST IN A LIQUIDITY CRISIS BECAUSE ALREADY (RIDICULOUSLY) INSOLVENT? 🚨 Thank you for waiting, but I assure you what follows isn't going to disappoint you! 😁 Two months ago in "This time is NOT different - Part 2," I flagged…

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

#JustDarioDaily 🚨THE BIG BANKS ARE ALREADY UTILIZING THE FED BTFP! 🚨 What do $JPM, $C, $WFC, $PNC, $SCHW, $BAC, and $GS have in common at the moment (besides greed)? They are all losing a shit ton of money... The top spot goes to $BAC, currently carrying $135bn "paper losses"…

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

#JustDarioDaily 🚨WHY, WITHOUT QE, THE US TREASURY WILL β€œKILL A LOT OF ZOMBIES" AND SPARK MASS UNEMPLOYMENT🚨 After last Friday's close, Moody's announced their decision to revise the outlook for the US Government Debt Credit Rating to "Negative". Ok, technically speaking, it…

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

⚠️The great paradox of CRE lending: while owners are freaking out, banks are chilling 🫣 Q2 US bank earnings reported so far paint such a rosy picture of CRE loan risk. Yes, they admit there will be an uptick in losses (maybe), but banks barely show any concern. So why are CRE landlords panicking, not being shy with the press, describing the situation as "apocalyptic" or "a Cat 5 Hurricane"? πŸ€” This is how the BIS, the "central bank of central banks," defines CRE loan risk: "the prospects for servicing the loan materially depend on the cash flows generated by the property securing the loan rather than on the underlying capacity of the borrower to service the debt from other sources." According to this (flawed) metric, as long as the property has enough tenants to cover the interests, then the loan wouldn't be considered problematic. This valuation approach applies to "Close-end residential loans" (CERL) where the borrower is typically a corporate landlord that rents the properties. Hence, these assets are as well materially dependent on the ability of these to generate enough income to cover interests. Here is the mind-blowing fact: despite what happened in 2008, banks still need to appraise the principal value of real estate collateral only if they are the principal occupant of the property. πŸ™„ Remember what triggered the 2008 GFC? Yes, interest-only loans... 🀯 So when will CRE ($2.9T) and CERL ($2.3T) start to be a problem for US banks? Most of these loans are "non-recurring," meaning the landlord can hand over the keys to the lender and walk away. While, as of now, CERL properties' vacancy rates are still at historical average ( $BREIT investors can take a sigh of relief), CRE vacancy rates are increasing fast and currently at 18.6%, a level seen last time during the CRE glut of the early '90s. This is an aggregated number, though. If we split it into Cat A, Cat B, and Cat C CRE office buildings, according to CRE office landlords, the vacancy for the last two categories is already at 50% and 70% in some prime locations like NYC, LA, and SF, with many Cat C buildings already completely empty, badly in need of heavy renovations, and practically worthless. Then it shouldn't come as a surprise that big landlords like Brookfield and Starwood started to default on their CRE loans and hand over the properties to banks. Why are CRE landlords so catastrophic? Because the trend is spreading to Cat A buildings with sub-lease availability climbing fast, signaling tenants' intention to downsize as soon as their agreements expire (unless they walk away earlier than that). Accounting for the current sublease rates reported by CBRE, the real vacancy rate of CRE is already beyond 25% in aggregate 😳 When the banks get hold of a property, they need to start assessing its "value," but again here no problem on the surface since prices are holding up pretty well... in aggregate! What about Cat B and Cat C? The latest transactions reported a drop in prices already up to 35% in the first category and up to 60% for the second one πŸ₯Ά during the GFC, CRE property prices declined ~30% at the bottom of the crisis... now the crisis didn't even start! ⚠️ Considering the average LTV for a CRE loan is ~75%, banks are already "losing" on their principal, and this is only the beginning πŸ₯΅ It's impossible to make forecasts at this stage, but banks (and regulators) are dangerously ignoring the risk banks will end up holding a huge amount of Cat B and Cat C worthless CRE. Isn't this what's exactly happening in China? Look at how things are going there, with even state-backed developers defaulting on their debt (#Wanda and #Greenland), and #stocks already trading at the same levels as during the GFC 🚨 Add to this banks' mounting liquidity problems, with FHLB advances already at ATH beyond GFC levels and an ongoing deposits hemorrhage, and you have the perfect setup for the mother of all banking crises. 🀯 Suggested read: https://nymag.com/press/2023/07/the-panic-and-pivot-of-manhattans-office-megalandlords.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentioned that further signs of improvement are needed before reducing the stimulus. They highlighted that economic growth in Q1 was driven by increased demand from US households and businesses, offsetting the decline in government spending. However, the job market remains weak, with high unemployment rates and long-term unemployment. The central bank is currently injecting $85 billion into the economy monthly to keep borrowing costs low and promote investment, hiring, and economic growth. Although consumer spending on items like cars and housing is increasing, more action is required.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They will need to see further signs of improvement before easing off on that stimulus. He told the congressional joint economic committee Speaker 1: Economic growth in the Q1 was supported by continuing expansion in demand by US households and businesses, which more than offset the drag from declines in government spending, especially defense spending. Despite this improvement, the job market remains weak overall. The The unemployment rate is still well above its longer run normal level. Rates of long term unemployment are historically high, and the labor force participation rate has continued to move Move down. Speaker 0: The central bank's currently pumping $85,000,000,000 into the economy each month by buying treasury and mortgage bonds. That's to keep borrowing costs low and encourage investment, hiring, and economic growth. But Anke as it is working with consumer spending rising on things like cars and housing, but more is needed.
On the Cover: The Panic and Pivot of Manhattan’s Office Megalandlords On the Cover of New York Magazine: The panic and pivot of Manhattan’s office megalandlords. Andrew Rice writes on the crisis of historically high post-pandemic office vacancy rates. nymag.com
Saved - January 9, 2024 at 4:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Despite interest rate hikes, the market hasn't crashed yet due to the lag in monetary policy and households' savings buffer. The full effects of rate hikes are yet to be felt, and when they do, they will be significant. Additionally, the surge in personal savings during the pandemic acted as a temporary shock absorber. However, as savings deplete and credit costs rise, consumer spending will retract, impacting the market. The Federal Reserve's intervention in 2023 prevented a market crash by supporting banks, but underlying issues of high debt levels and over-leveraged positions may surface in 2024.

@MFHoz - HZ

🧡 Why the Market Hasn’t Crashed Yet Despite Interest Rate Hikes, But Is Poised for a Downturn in 2024 πŸ”» https://t.co/5KFQuBWQyY

@MFHoz - HZ

1/ Monetary Policy Lag: First, understand that monetary policy, especially interest rate adjustments, doesn’t impact the economy instantaneously. It’s akin to a delayed fuse; changes in interest rates take time to percolate through the economy. When the Fed hikes rates, the immediate effect isn’t a crash but a gradual adjustment. Businesses and consumers adjust their spending and investment decisions slowly. This lag explains why we haven’t seen a market crash yet, despite the rate hikes. The full effects are yet to be felt, and when they do, they will be significant.

@MFHoz - HZ

2/ Households’ Savings Buffer: The pandemic era saw a surge in personal savings. Many households accumulated a financial cushion, thanks to stimulus checks and reduced spending opportunities during lockdowns. This excess savings acted as a shock absorber against the initial effects of rate hikes. People weren’t as pressed to cut spending or liquidate investments immediately, which in normal circumstances could lead to a market downturn. However, this is a temporary buffer. As savings deplete and credit costs rise, consumer spending will retract, inevitably impacting the market.

@MFHoz - HZ

3/ Federal Reserve’s Bank Support in 2023: A critical point here is the Federal Reserve’s intervention to support banks in 2023. This move provided a safety net for the financial sector, preventing a cascade of failures that could have led to a market crash. By ensuring liquidity and stability in the banking sector, the Fed averted an immediate crisis. However, this is more a deferral than a solution. The underlying issues of high debt levels and over-leveraged positions remain and are likely to surface as the economic conditions tighten further in 2024.

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 10:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Reserve has implemented the BTFP program, which is benefiting big banks like JPM, C, WFC, PNC, SCHW, BAC, and GS. However, investors are mistakenly assuming that the program will cover losses in the credit space, which is not the case. Banks are manipulating their numbers to beat expectations, and investors are turning a blind eye. European banks will likely face even bigger losses due to government bonds. Without the BTFP, banks will struggle to hide their losses. The Fed wants banks to use the discount window, but this may reveal their insolvency. Investors will now scrutinize banks' books more seriously. The Fed's announcement has shocked many, and it signifies a significant change in the banking sector.

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

🚨BREAKING: THE #FED JUST PULLED THE PLUG TO BANKS #BTFP LIFE SUPPORT🚨 1 - I was wrong, I never thought they had the guts to do it 2 - Read my post below from months ago to understand how critical is the #BTFP to keep the whole financial system together Fasten your seatbelts! https://t.co/39DOOewK62

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

#JustDarioDaily 🚨THE BIG BANKS ARE ALREADY UTILIZING THE FED BTFP! 🚨 What do $JPM, $C, $WFC, $PNC, $SCHW, $BAC, and $GS have in common at the moment (besides greed)? They are all losing a shit ton of money... The top spot goes to $BAC, currently carrying $135bn "paper losses" in its belly, followed by $C and $WFC, both at around $100bn. True, these losses are only due to the increase in interest rates, and the US will never default on its debt (because if it does, we go back to barter). Hence, these are "paper losses," and banks are in great shape, right! Well... thanks to the FED's "virtual bailout," better known as the BTFP program they are already benefiting from… Wait what? Yes sir! Why am I saying that the big banks are already utilizing the #BTFP? Am I nuts? No, I am not, and I will explain why. Because of the #BTFP potential total capacity of up to $2T, investors are already associating its benefits with the big banks, even if they are not tapping into it (yet). Wait a second, doesn't the #BTFP expire in 5 months? Well... if Jerome Burns wants the world to keep believing the #FED will maintain rates "higher for longer," he has no alternative but to extend the duration of the program, making it "temporarily permanent," just like they did for Quantitative Easing before (for example). The FED enjoys keeping its cake and eating it too, so rest assured their habits will not change. 😌 There is a problem, though. The #BTFP only covers US Treasuries, Agencies, and Government Guaranteed MBS. Here is where investors are making a big (big) mistake. ⚠️They are assuming that if the time comes, the "BTFP cocoon" will transform into a "TARP butterfly"! πŸ› This is the only rational explanation for the market willingly ignoring what's going on in the Credit space, starting from Commercial Real Estate, and not "punishing" the Big Banks for the ridiculously low Credit Loss Provisions they booked for Q3. Another sign of this general thought lies in Credit Spreads across all rating spectrums "refusing" to increase. [https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1713812823938384383?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA]. πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ Banks are as smart as foxes, and they have seized the opportunity. Have you noticed that Credit Loss Provisions for Q3 are consistently lower than Q2 for all the banks that reported so far, despite the increase in Non-Performing Loans (and a general skyrocketing of Chapter 11 filings)? While before, I felt a bit lonely, I have to admit that now it is so obvious that banks are "twisting" the numbers so much to "beat expectations" that they are at odds with the reality everyone can observe. Although we cannot blame them too much when the government, which should police them, is doing exactly the same. πŸ™ˆ So here we are today, with banks faking their numbers in plain sight, and investors being happy about that. πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ In just a few decades, we have literally moved from the concept of an "Intelligent Investor" to an "Ignorant Investor." The reporting season is only beginning, and I am particularly curious to see how European banks will fare, starting from UB-C-S 😬, and how they will manage to hide the even bigger losses government bonds are digging into their HTM books. Notice I said "losses" and not "paper losses" because in Europe, they don't have a BTFP (yet). Considering the outrageously high inflation in a contingent that is barely growing its GDP, it will be very hard for politicians to endorse another inflative Central Bank weapon of mass wealth destruction. πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentioned that further signs of improvement are needed before reducing stimulus. Economic growth in Q1 was driven by increased demand from US households and businesses, offsetting declines in government spending. However, the job market remains weak, with high unemployment rates and a decrease in labor force participation. Currently, the central bank is injecting $85 billion into the economy monthly to keep borrowing costs low and stimulate investment, hiring, and economic growth. Consumer spending on cars and housing has increased, but more action is required.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They will need to see further signs of improvement before easing off on that stimulus. He told the congressional joint economic committee Speaker 1: Economic growth in the Q1 was supported by continuing expansion in demand by US households and businesses, which more than offset the drag from declines in government spending, especially defense spending. Despite this improvement, the job market remains weak overall. The The unemployment rate is still well above its longer run normal level. Rates of long term unemployment are historically high, and the labor force participation rate has continued to move Move down. Speaker 0: The central bank's currently pumping $85,000,000,000 into the economy each month by buying treasury and mortgage bonds. That's to keep borrowing costs low and encourage investment, hiring, and economic growth. But Anke as it is working with consumer spending rising on things like cars and housing, but more is needed.

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

My comment on this news πŸ‘‡πŸ»

@DarioCpx - JustDario πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ

#JustDarioDaily 🚨WITHOUT THE #FED #BTFP, BANKS WILL NOW HAVE A HARDER TIME TO β€œHIDE TILL MATURITY” THEIR LOSSES πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸš¨ I started the year writing about how in 2024 the practice used by banks of hiding their losses in Hold to Maturity books (hence β€œhide till maturity”) would have come to an end [Post Below]. However, I was wrong there, because I wrote this: β€œAs I explained in a post almost 3 months ago (x.com/dariocpx/statu…), big banks too are benefiting from the #BTFP, which is why the only scenario in which this program isn't extended this coming March is the one where the #FED led by Jerome Burns goes totally out of its mind.” Well.. As per the #FED press release that just came out at 7pm EST today (Picture 1), either our dear Jerome Burns finally realized what it means to be a Central Banker, or he lost his mind and unintentionally just rug pulled half of the US banking sector. There is a potential third justification for the #FOMC action though: okay, we are in a US election year, and a bull market is good for the incumbent president, but looking at what’s happening with $NVDA, imagine if this idiocy pops before November from a much higher market cap, and Biden ends up being forced to bail out hedge funds, fraudsters, and gamblers singing β€œKumbaya!” all together on this stock right now. πŸ™„ Please let me know in the comments what do you thinks is the reason that pushed the #FED to do what they just did. Nevertheless, the outcome is not going to change, and this is what’s coming. 🚩 THE #FED WILL STOP β€œLEAKING” LIQUIDITY As you can see in Picture 2, the #BTFP was effectively #FED QE in disguise, and it is not a coincidence that the #stocks bubble re-inflated once the net liquidity in the system resumed its climb. 🚩 THE #FED WANTS (TO TEACH) BANKS TO USE THE DISCOUNT WINDOW There are two reasons why banks don’t like to go (and beg) at the #FED discount window: 1 - Makes their liquidity issues manifest. 2 - The discount applied to the assets they want to pledge for liquidity (usually the best they can offer) will reveal the true value of their HTM books and, likely, their insolvency. Now here is where the #FED is making a big mistake. Many US Regional Banks right now have an insolvency problem, hence they need capital. Accessing liquidity at the discount window won’t have any impact on the radioactive defaults in their Loans books. Imagine my shock if they already have a new TARP plan drafted out at the #FED but they hope there won’t be a need to disclose it before November. 🚩 INVESTORS WILL NOW SCRUTINISE BANKS' BOOKS MORE SERIOUSLY So far this year, the US banks' earnings season has been horrible, to say the least. Ask anyone working in a bank how’s the mood there and what do they expect the business to go in the near future; while in #stocks, the morale is through the roof, bankers' one is through the floor. Despite this, bank #stocks have been doing okay since the Q4-23 earnings season started. Why? Because the #FED β€œgot it covered” with its magic wand that could fix everything like, for example, empty shopping mall loans stuck in the books of a bank somewhere and now worth not even the cost of the material build that shopping mall to begin with. Management at banks like $BAC totally embraced this thinking to the point there is barely a trace of CRE crisis in their results πŸ™ˆ: https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1746581808538689762?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA Personally, I couldn’t believe my eyes 1 hour ago when the #FED announcement popped up on my screen, I even went to check if it could have been a deep fake or, like what happened to their #SEC cousins, the #FED too didn’t use a 2FA to protect their X account. But no, the official announcement was there on their website (Picture 3) and all it missed were 2 words at the end of it: β€œGAME OVER” 😐

Saved - February 2, 2024 at 4:27 AM

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

We might have our first bank failure of 2024 incoming. And the OCC proposing a new rule to wave margin requirements for big banks in periods of β€œhigh volatility” Wonder what they’re worried might cause high volatility πŸ€” I’m sure their hundreds of trillions of dollars of derivatives will be fine…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Banks are attempting to change rules to avoid collapse, particularly in relation to derivatives. Derivatives are risky bets in the stock market that caused the 2008 financial crisis. Despite promises of regulation, banks continue to engage in unregulated and unreported derivative trading. A new proposed rule aims to allow big banks to avoid margin calls during periods of market volatility, essentially giving them a free pass on risky bets. The recent example of Archegos and Credit Suisse highlights the dangers of counterparty risk in the derivative market. This rule change suggests that banks are anticipating increased market volatility. Overall, politicians and regulators are aligned with the interests of banks, and the global monetary system is highly leveraged.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The banks are getting scared. They're trying to change the rules so they don't go under. I'm for real. The other day, New York Community Bank woke up like this. Q bank failures 2024, and just a couple of days ago they tried to pass this new rule about derivatives, and the implications are super spicy. So a quick refresher, derivatives, meaning, like, bets in the stock market that can go completely hog wild, are what caused 2,008 to collapse. It was one specific type of derivative that they were super hyped on at the time, but derivatives in general allow for banks to just go absolutely fucking apeshit with all kinds of speculation on huge amounts of leverage. So if they're wrong, if things go badly, the whole economy can collapse. And after it almost did, Obama signed this wonderful bill called Dodd Frank that totally was gonna change everything. He said, quote, Wall Street reform, Dodd Frank, the laws that we have passed worked. It's popular in the media and political discourse, both on the left and the right, to suggest that the crisis happened and nothing changed. That is not true. Sorry. I should be doing my Obama voice. That is not true. We are moving in the derivative sector. A huge amount of oversight? Fuck that. We don't have time for all that in his voice. Basically, the idea was all these derivatives that are just shady backdoor deals, banks betting with other banks without telling anyone else what they're betting on with hugest amounts of money that is not all theirs. A lot of it doesn't even exist because they're banking on leverage. Obama promised that they were all gonna come into the light and be traded on exchanges so we could regulate them and everything would be safe from here on out. And that is why, as of the most recent report, JPMorgan is holding $58,000,000,000,000 worth of derivatives, closely followed by Goldman Sachs and Citibank. For a little perspective here, I took the GDP of all of the biggest countries in the world, and I put them on this cute little chart scaled in 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars. And if you add up every country except the US, all these ones highlighted in red, Then you get that blue bar $55,000,000,000,000. That's all of them except the US added together. Remember, gross domestic product, Everything that those countries the all of these countries combined creates a value in an entire year. And that red bar is JPMorgan alone, How much derivatives they are currently holding open. Just for scale. But Obama told us that don't worry, they're gonna do It's not gonna be dangerous. They're gonna All regulated and out in the open market, and it's gonna be safe. And that is why as of the most recent reporting last year, 96% of JPMorgan's trades are over the counter, meaning in dark markets where they are not regulated and they are not reported. Only 3% of their derivatives contracts traded on exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange, and this is for every single bank. Some of them are 100% over the counter. This is the exact opposite of what Obama told us they were gonna do with the derivatives market. And shocker, derivatives got so popular into 2008. And what happened next? Nothing. They stayed really popular because this is the number one way for banks and big rich financial institutions to take our money, and they've already been shown that when they fuck up, they get bailed out. And that brings us to this new regulation that they just tried to get through. And for all you dipshits out there that are always trying to be like this is notional value, he doesn't know what he's talking about. Yeah. We know what notional value is, guys. Sit tight while we learn about this new rule because notional value matters. I first got wind of this just a few days ago when this Reddit user, what Can I make today? Posted and broke this whole bill down. If you Google what you're seeing on the screen here, you can find this post. And yes, I went corroborated what he is claiming on the official government The law itself is a long document with a whole bunch of legalese that's very confusing. But basically what it's saying is when the markets are really crazy, how How about if we just let the big banks, like, kind of, well, it's really crazy. Let's just not margin call them. See, when the banks or anyone places derivative bets on the market, they have to have a certain amount of collateral just in case the trade goes wrong, particularly because all these trades are being done on margin, meaning money they don't actually have. But sometimes the market does crazy things and gets what we call volatile, and they're worried that that could threaten the stability of its members during periods of heightened volatility. Oh, by the way, its members referring to the OCC, This is their member directory. We're talking people like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Vanguard, Vertu, Instinet, Citigroup, Bank of America, Nasdaq, you get the idea. Not you, you filthy peasant. And they're worried that if the market gets crazy, a sudden Stream increase in margin requirements could stress one of their member's ability to obtain liquidity to meet its obligations, particularly in periods of high volatility. I can't imagine why they would be expecting extreme volatility in the markets soon. So they're proposing changing the rules so that when the markets go crazy all the biggest players just get a free pass on having their bets going wrong. Not you though. Marge will call you so fucking fast. They specifically refer to what happened with GameStop as an example of why they should all not have to deal with all this market volatility and should get a free pass on having a ton of risky bets and not having enough margin to cover them. Remember how much risky betting we're talking about here. Remember that it is 96 traded over the counter, meaning unregulated and unchecked. What they are specifically concerned about is something called counterparty risk. Because all these 100 of 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of derivatives, They are not all just open trades that if you get it wrong, you lose all the money. It's a bunch of hedges and balances back and forth, and when they Open a position for someone in this direction, they open their own position in the other direction to cover their asses. It's all very complicated. Yes. To all the haters, we know what notional value means. Y'all need to learn what counterparty risk means, like Bill Huang learned real quick. See, back around when Game Stuff happened. Bill was doing a whole bunch of kinda secret over the counter trading of really high derivatives with a bunch of money that he didn't exactly have And, you know, like, the exact same thing the banks are doing on those sheets I'm showing you. But the problem is once his trades kinda started to go a little wrong and then, like, the GameStop thing happened and all the markets Crazy, and he just kinda lost control of, like, the margin in his portfolio. And his firm went bankrupt pretty damn quick. But the problem is that the counterparty to almost all of his trades was Credit Suisse. And the moment that his firm, Archegos, ceased to exist, Suddenly, Credit Suisse was holding all of these trades open with no one on the other side to fulfill. Meaning, what were balanced Hedged positions one day. The very next day were complete YOLO's just like balls deep into whatever directions Bill had left them on the hook for. And if you didn't know, Credit Suisse is not with us anymore, largely because of Bill and Archegos. All of these 100 of 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of derivative risk rely on no one going bankrupt. Because if any one of these big players gets into trouble, everyone else's bets are completely fucked. And that is why they're trying to argue that They should all get a pass on margin calls more or less when there's times of extreme market volatility because, like, that's just weird random stuff. It's like, You know, like, when the market doesn't play by the rules, we just, like, get a little pass until the rules are back on. Right? Because, like, you know, we're big we're good guys. So if you wanna know more, you can search out this post by searching the title on the screen. This is in Super Stonk on Reddit. Homie wrote up an awesome summary and then he even wrote a sample comment letter That you can submit if you wanna submit comments that they're not expecting because the poors are not supposed to get involved. So So if you want a key takeaway here, politicians work for the banks. The regulators work for the banks. Most of it's self regulated anyways. Oh, yeah. I forgot to mention that you also work for the bank's corporate income taxes, individual income taxes, and the entire global monetary system It's leveraged to the absolute tits. And we might be in the process of watching our very first bank failure of the year, but probably not our last. This new rule tells me that they're expecting lots of volatility coming up, and that's why
Saved - March 4, 2024 at 4:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Reserve eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions, leading to concerns about a banking collapse. CEOs of major banks expressed their inability to meet reserve balance requirements. The possibility of a run on the banks and the confiscation of assets through the bail-in provision raised alarm. The middle class may suffer, potentially impacting the upcoming presidential election. The stock market may remain stable, but the banks and the dollar are predicted to collapse. Cryptocurrencies, gold, and silver are seen as hedges against inflation. It is advised not to keep cash in banks.

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel

BANKING COLLAPSE IMMINENT THE RESET HAS BEGUN Effective March 26, 2020, the The Federal Reserve Board reduced reserve requirement ratios on all net transaction accounts to zero percent, eliminating reserve requirements for all depository institutions In Spring 2023 the Banking Collapse started with smaller regional banks. In Spring 2024 the next wave of Banking Collapse will continue. Nov 2023 the CEOs of Bank of America, Wells Fargo and JP Morgan told Congress they could not go from 0% reserves to be held to a 3% reserve balance. The current Deposit to Loan Ratios means the banks can not sustain any type of run on the banks. When the people realize what is happening their will be a run on the banks. Effective March 11, 2024 there will be no more money to loan out and the Fed will pick and choose who gets to loan out money Congress passed the bail In provision with 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act which allows the banks to confiscate assets. The bail-in relief was legalized in the U.S. following the 2007–2008 financial crisis in which banks deemed β€œtoo big to fail” were bailed out by the U.S. government. The specific section of Dodd-Frank that deals with bail-ins is Title II: Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA). Who's exposed? βœ…401Ks (Retirement Accounts) - currently there are $27T in retirement accounts βœ…People with cash positions in banks will have their money taken. The banks have already started this by limiting how much money you can take out, transfer on Zelle or move in general. What does this mean? This will be the demise of the middle class leading to a recession and then depression. People will be left with nothing if they do not diversify their cash into paying off loans, buying gold, silver, crypto or other hard assets. Potential? This could keep Trump from winning the White House. In a bank collapse the government could institute martial law, shut the banks and ration your access to money. The loss already sustained in 2020 is worse than what happened in 2008. The stock market manipulation coupled with the massive money printing and inflation has done a better job of masking the incoming collapse. AND COLLAPSE IS COMING Worldwide markets - Honk Kong, Japan , S&P, Dow - all time highs - why? Blackrock and Vanguard control trillions in assets and they are manipulating those stocks with sustained earnings and rotating out any stocks that can't perform and rotating in AI stocks into S&P 500 and other exchanges. Result: The stock markets will hang in there, but the banks and the dollar will collapse. Cryptos are going crazy and will allow purchasing stocks with crypto. And as BRICS comes more online, your are going to see the transfer to asset backed transactions like the new @abaxx_exchange will facilitate in #LNG and #batterymetals What is the hedge against inflation: With the last month in the crypto market you can't ignore that crypto, gold, and silver are the hedge against inflation. Warning: Keeping cash in banks is not the safe nor smart play. Putin had his take on the U.S. dollar too https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cnZPz2AlfQ0

Saved - March 8, 2024 at 12:28 PM

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The Banking Collapse πŸ“‰ "The financial world is on edge as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's alarming statement ". β€œI Expect There To Be Bank Failures” Guess what ends Monday? Bank Term Funding Program. This is one of the reasons Donald Trump said... "It's Over".

Saved - March 10, 2024 at 10:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Reserve has eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions. Banking collapses are expected in 2023 and 2024 due to low reserves. Banks may seize assets and limit withdrawals. This could lead to the demise of the middle class and a recession. The government may institute martial law and ration access to money. Stock markets will hold, but banks and the dollar will collapse. Cryptocurrencies, gold, and silver are seen as hedges against inflation.

@QFs_Global - Tp

THE RESET HAS STARTED Effective March 26, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board reduced required reserve ratios on all net transaction accounts to zero percent, eliminating reserve requirements for all depository institutions. In the spring of 2023 the banking collapse began in the smaller regional banks. In the spring of 2024 the next wave of banking collapse will continue. In November 2023, the CEOs of Bank of America, Wells Fargo and JP Morgan told Congress that they could not go from 0% reserves to a 3% reserve balance. Current deposit-to-loan ratios mean that banks cannot withstand any type of bank run. When people realize what is happening, there will be a bank run. Starting March 11, 2024, there will be no more money to lend and the Federal Reserve will choose who can lend money. Congress approved bail provided in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which allows banks to seize assets. Bailout relief was legalized in the United States after the 2007-2008 financial crisis, in which the US government bailed out banks deemed β€œtoo big to fail.” The specific section of Dodd-Frank that deals with bail-ins is Title II: Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA). Who is exposed? 401K (Retirement Accounts): There are currently $27 billion in retirement accounts People with cash positions in banks will have their money taken away. Banks have already started limiting the amount of money you can withdraw, transfer on Zelle, or move around in general. What does this mean? This will be the demise of the middle class, leading to a recession and then a depression. People will be left with nothing if they don't diversify their cash to pay off loans and buy gold, silver, cryptocurrencies or other tangible assets. Potential? This could prevent Trump from winning the White House. In the event of a banking collapse, the government could institute martial law, close banks and ration access to money. The loss already suffered in 2020 is worse than what occurred in 2008. Stock market manipulation, along with massive money printing and inflation, have managed to better mask the coming collapse. AND THE COLLAPSE IS COMING World markets - Honk Kong, Japan, S&P, Dow - all-time highs - why? Blackrock and Vanguard control trillions in assets and are manipulating those stocks for sustained profits and rotating stocks that cannot perform and rotating AI stocks into the S&P 500 and other exchanges. Result: Stock markets will hold, but banks and the dollar will collapse. Cryptocurrencies are going crazy and will allow you to buy stocks with cryptocurrencies. And as the BRICS become more online, they will see the transfer to asset-backed transactions like the new abaxx_exchange that will facilitate LNG and batterymetals. What is inflation hedging? With the last month in the cryptocurrency market, it cannot be ignored that cryptocurrencies, gold and silver are the hedge against inflation.

Saved - March 18, 2024 at 11:03 PM

@1CoastalJournal - The Coastal Journal

As the financial markets week kicks off, regional #banks continue their #bloodbath as The Feds Powell will announce Higher for longer at the #FOMC meeting on Wednesday. https://t.co/9SNyBaXDns

Saved - May 13, 2024 at 5:14 AM

@balajis - Balaji

The banking system broke in 2023. They've just been hiding it in plain sight. And it's already far beyond 2008. https://t.co/Uk3yhV4rKH

@StealthQE4 - QE Infinity

The GFC bailout looks like just a blip on the radar vs what the Fed is doing today to support the banks with liquidity via loans/facilities. And we wonder why the market is up. This chart blew me away. https://t.co/AAUQuSgRqU

Saved - May 31, 2024 at 3:05 PM

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Banks have half a trillion in unrealized losses and the Fed will print every penny of it if any of the GSIBs actually fail https://t.co/IHjmA3G6bh

Saved - March 21, 2025 at 11:31 PM

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

FINALLY people are admitting the Federal Reserve & bank cartel caused the 2020 financial crisis, intentionally releasing "the virus" to cover it up! πŸ₯³ Only now it's too late, because they're about to do it again...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Federal Reserve has destabilized the economy and operates with a lack of transparency. Money is a medium of exchange and unit of account; banks profit through fractional reserve banking, creating new money via loans. Central banks, like the Fed, allow governments to spend beyond their means, creating a "fiscal illusion." Prior to the Fed's creation, the gold standard restrained government spending. The Fed was established in 1913 to stabilize the banking system, but the 1933 Banking Act expanded its power, forming the Federal Open Market Committee to manage monetary policy. The Fed's actions lead to boom and bust cycles, intentionally cheapening the dollar's value. The shift to fiat currency in 1971 caused economic uncertainty and stagflation. The Fed's inflationary policies create winners and losers, benefiting the government, large corporations, and political elites at the expense of the average American. Financialization has exploded since going off the gold standard. The Fed's low interest rates inflated the housing bubble in the early 2000s, leading to the 2008 crisis and new interventions. The Fed responded to the 2020 pandemic with inflationary tools, further expanding its power. A Fed-controlled digital currency could magnify this power, enabling control over spending. Austrian economists advocate for ending the Fed, limiting government intervention, and abolishing fractional reserve banking, favoring a market-driven money supply and a return to sound money, possibly linked to gold.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Fed has made the economy more unstable than it was before the Fed. Speaker 1: They, the keeper of the keys of the magic kingdom of money, would rather you didn't understand. Speaker 2: They would like to be thought of as the problem solver that shows up and puts out the fire. But in fact, they're really the arsonist that started the fire to begin with. Speaker 3: For over a century, The United States financial leadership, guided by its central bank, the Federal Reserve, has acquired immense control over the economy. Yet the Fed's dominant role on the global economic stage and its impact on everyday Americans often goes unexamined. It's time to look behind the curtain at this pivotal institution to see how it works, how its decisions have affected our lives, and if we need a Fed to secure our financial future. Before we can dive into deeper analysis of the Fed, there are several fundamental concepts and historical events which are important to understand. The first of which is what is money? Speaker 4: So economists look on money as the general medium of exchange. That is that everyone sells the things that they produce or they sell their services for something that everyone else will accept. Speaker 0: For thousands of years, human civilization settled on gold and silver as the main sources of money. Speaker 4: And in modern society, everyone accepts money. But it's also a common unit of account. And what we mean by that is that it's a pricing unit. So everyone prices their goods and services that they desire to sell in terms of money, which makes it easy for people to compare the prices of different goods. Speaker 3: So where do banks fit in? Speaker 1: People observed that it was cumbersome to carry this around, so bankers came into existence, and bankers would issue a piece of paper that says it's a claim on gold. Whoops, that's a monetary original sin right there. Speaker 0: When banks were invented, they're basically the warehouses of gold or whatever gold that you had, you would be given a certificate that you could use to redeem the gold or whenever you wanted it back. Speaker 4: Money's a commodity, like any other commodity, and it has a supply and demand. In The United States, that's the good old dollar bill. Also checking deposits, which are claims to dollar bills held by banks. Well, the role is to make it easy for people to exchange. Speaker 3: How do banks make a profit? With fractional reserve banking, it involves creating new money out of thin air, but Speaker 5: it comes with risks. Fractional reserve banking is just the idea that banks keep a fraction of deposits in reserve. So like somebody walks in and makes a deposit, what they actually do is they take that money and they use it to finance loans that they make to other people, business loans, mortgages, that sort of thing. Speaker 4: Let's say they can lend out 90%, that they're comfortable with keeping $1 for every $10 that people will deposit. So you can write checks up to $1,000 on that checking deposit, but at the same time, there's 900 more dollars in circulation than there was before you made that deposit. So in that case, they immediately create money. Speaker 3: That new money can then be loaned out by the originating bank and deposited into another bank, which can then loan out a portion of those deposits. Speaker 5: It means that enough depositors could come to the bank requesting the money. The bank would come up dry. They wouldn't have all the money there because they'd use the money to to finance those loans. Speaker 3: Now you may be asking yourself, where does the government fit into all this? Speaker 6: So if we look around the world, we find almost every country has a central bank because central banks are really handy In creating the Bank of France, Napoleon said, I want a bank that'll always lend me money. And that's what all governments want, spend more money than they have. Speaker 4: That's the way they get reelected. If it's financed by taxation, people immediately realize that it's coming out of their own pockets. Speaker 0: And the way it works in politics is the politicians love the Fed because it creates, what economists call a fiscal illusion, a sort of promise of something for nothing. Speaker 5: If everything is guided by all of this money printing and no bank is overextending itself, the whole system is working together and not expanding. That way, the whole system is sort of a cartel. Speaker 4: In other words, all the banks inflate together because they're all under the umbrella now of the Fed. Speaker 3: Prior to the creation of the Fed, people were using gold as money, and the gold standard was a constraint on government spending. Speaker 1: People will say that the dollar was backed by gold. No, it was defined as gold. Very important. Very important distinction. It was defined as a way of gold. And, it was codified in 1900. Gold Standard Act in 1900. People walked around with $20 gold pieces, in their pants pocket. You know, gold was a functional currency. Speaker 0: You weren't gonna experience financial disaster if, if that's what the system was about. And importantly, it restrained the ability of government to do what governments now do is just spend like Santa Claus. Speaker 4: And so in the beginning, that system seemed to work. Speaker 3: If the gold standard worked, why did the government create the central bank we now know as the Federal Reserve? Responding to the pressures of special interests that rose out of the Progressive Era and after years of regional and local banks failing due to fractional reserve banking, in 1913 the Federal Reserve Act was passed by the U. S. Congress and signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson. Speaker 1: The Fed came into being with every legislator promise that the gold standard remained. Speaker 4: The Fed was only supposed to be a lender of last resort. It was only to prevent mass bank failures. Speaker 5: And the goal was to stabilize the banking system, stabilize all the booms and busts that they were seeing. Speaker 3: The act created 12 regional Federal Reserve banks to serve distinct geographic areas of The United States. It required every national bank to become a member and hold stock in their respective regional Federal Reserve Bank. Speaker 1: Each Federal Reserve Bank is a corporation. Every bank in the district must subscribe to shares in the respective reserve banks in proportion to the capital of that private bank. Speaker 6: Federal Reserve Banks are banks. They have balance sheets. They have loans. They have investments. They have deposits. They have borrowed funds. They have capital. It's like a bank. Speaker 3: To manage the system, the act established a seven member Federal Reserve Board, now known as the Board of Governors. The supposed intent was to provide stability, banking expertise, and a diverse range of perspectives. Speaker 6: When the Fed was created, the secretary of the treasury was William Gibbs McAdoo, and he gave a great speech at the time in which he said, now that we have the Fed, financial booms and busts have ended. The Fed has made all of this only in the past, and we're entering a new world where this won't happen. Speaker 0: Then the crash happens, and they find out they lost their job. They lost their business. Speaker 3: In 1933, Congress passed a new banking act supposedly to restore confidence. This act set the stage for the ever changing evolution and increasing power of the Fed. It created the Federal Open Market Committee to manage the Fed's open market operations and formulate monetary policy. Speaker 1: So the Federal Open Market Committee, which consists of all the governors and a selection of the respect reserve banks, so these dozen outposts makes interest rate policy. Speaker 2: And those basically involved buying or selling short term government securities. Speaker 0: The president appoints the chairman of the Fed. Well, it's it's kinda like rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. You could call this institution the Fed or you could call it the government money printing apparatus, but it would create all the same problems. Speaker 1: I think now that boom and bust is the wrong figure of speech. I think that we should use fires and, fire departments putting them out. And the Fed serves a dual purpose. It is both the arsonist and the fireman. Speaker 3: The Austrian business cycle theory says that credit expansion leads to economy wide distortions. This means resources are misdirected toward unsustainable projects. This creates a boom and bust cycle, where an unsustainable economic expansion built on misdirected resources is followed by a sharp decline. Speaker 1: The Fed came into business before you knew it, it was doing the government's work of inflating the currency. Speaker 2: When someone is manipulating the unit that we're all using, that that's gonna have adverse consequences. Speaker 1: The Fed actually intends to cheapen the value of your money by 2% a year. It's kind of this monetary that's giving 2% off the top of whatever you think you earned. Speaker 5: We still have financial crises. We still have booms and busts. Speaker 1: This is the government getting into the act. Speaker 3: And get into the act they did in a big way. Speaker 7: I have directed secretary Connolly to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets except in amounts and conditions determined to be in the interest of monetary stability and in the best interest of The United States. Speaker 6: So in '71, they might have done other things like raise the price of gold, say, well, dollars are worth less, but instead they just said, no, we're not paying, so tough luck. But it was tough luck for the world because that allowed in a pure paper money world, that is to say currency which has no intrinsic value, could be created with no link to gold or other precious metals in peacetime. Speaker 2: It's all fiat currency. It's all just paper. Speaker 1: What is fiat money? Fiat money is the opposite of the inherently valuable gold coin. And thereafter, from that data to this, the dollar has owed its value to habit, to confidence in this great country. Speaker 3: This shift to a fiat currency created dramatic economic uncertainty as foreign exchange markets became volatile. Prices ballooned. Higher costs led to job losses. The combination gave us a new financial term, stagflation, and that became a defining feature of the decade. Speaker 6: And in the middle of that, as a result of the nineteen seventies inflation, then under Paul Volcker, the Federal Reserve forced up interest rates to break the inflation and to break these bubbles. Speaker 3: In the nineteen eighties, these interest rates and a weak economy made it more difficult for governments and banks to repay their debts, contributing to the savings and loan crisis and the debt crisis in Latin America. Speaker 6: And when that great inflation finally stopped in the eighties, we had a lot of markets which had come to rely on the inflation of asset prices and on the printing of money. Speaker 3: Why would the Fed want to use inflation to create winners and losers? Speaker 0: The reason is somebody profits from it. And if somebody's profiting from it, somebody else is losing by it. And it's a really good example of Speaker 5: what the Fed does in a general sense, which is they they create winners and losers. It means that the Fed has fundamentally altered the makeup of the economy. Speaker 4: The Fed creates inflation, and it does so not just because it wants to see prices rise. Because if all prices rose, there'd be no reason for inflation. But in the real world, when money's injected into the economy, some people get it first. Speaker 5: So as as soon as you take on this ability to to bail out some people, it means that you are saying you get to be the winner, and everybody else who doesn't get bailed out, they get to be the losers. Speaker 3: So who are the winners? Speaker 4: They're not elected officials. To some extent, they're doing the bidding of elected officials, Fed bureaucrats, but they're rearranging our lives by by messing with with with the money. Speaker 5: The government is always the winner because when the Fed is printing up new money, it it means that the government can benefit. It means that the government is they're the first spender of Speaker 2: the brand new money. So large corporations, not small corporations. Large banks, not small banks. And then the political elites that sort of control the political system. The people who get the money first are also the same sort of people who have the most influence on the Fed itself. Speaker 0: Politicians can offer this program, that program to benefit everybody, and they don't have Speaker 3: to raise taxes. Now who are the losers? Speaker 2: The average working American and their family unit is who really pays the price, during this cycle of boom and bust, that the Fed is supposedly saving us every time. Speaker 5: It's Econ one zero one. You can't get something from nothing. Physics one zero one as well. And so what that means is it's it's the government taking, and it's the cost of that is going on to everybody else. Speaker 2: Going off the gold standard took away that certainty, and it injected the Fed with more power, which has created more uncertainty. Speaker 6: Now when they print up the money to pay for the loss, that's effectively a debt of the US government. Speaker 2: So every time they tell us that they're solving a problem, what they're really doing is rescuing their own reputation from what they previously brought on. Speaker 6: Unless you're the Fed, you can't stay in business and do that. Speaker 3: When it comes to the economy, it seems crises and the Fed go hand in hand. Speaker 4: The Fed has always used emergencies to expand their powers. Speaker 5: And so as we have more crises that are generated by the Fed and the banking system, it gives them a foundation for new interventions. It gives them a chance to grab more power. Speaker 3: In the wake of the crises of the late twentieth century, after the country went off the gold standard, the financial sector exploded in size as the country shifted away from industrial production. The growing dominance of finance over other sectors of the economy became known as financialization. Speaker 1: So financialization is the treatment of finance not as the means to an end, but as an end in itself. Speaker 2: It doesn't really produce anything by itself. It just helps us with financial matters, with investing, with raising capital, with allocating savings, those kind of things. So we're talking about stocks, bonds, banks, and so forth. Speaker 5: So you can see the financialization of the economy and how the finance, insurance, and real estate companies, that sector has exploded, especially since we went off the gold standard. Speaker 1: These dominant Wall Street banks are now cartels empowered in that regard by the Federal Reserve itself. Speaker 3: And in the new millennium, the Fed seemed to assume a more aggressive role. Speaker 4: The economists in the late nineties and early two thousands to begin to talk about the fact that we were in a great moderation. Speaker 6: What we found out that the great moderation really was was the great leveraging up, the great inflation of money. Speaker 0: And so they use language like that, as do all government bureaucracies, to make things seem much more pleasant than they than they really are. Speaker 4: The Fed used the argument that, well, we have to make sure that unemployment stays low and that production stays high and that growth is going along at a good pace. Speaker 0: The Fed doesn't do anything but but drop interest rates and and and print money. That's all it does. Every time they create a bubble and the bubble bursts, their response is, well, we need to create another bubble. Speaker 5: The Fed worked to push interest rates down below the natural rate, and this is where we saw the housing bubble being inflated. Speaker 2: And, basically, the Fed created a housing bubble after 02/2001 with very low interest rates and a lot of moral suasion for people to buy houses and to be invested in housing. And the American people responded. Speaker 3: So what was the role of big banks and Wall Street in all of this? Speaker 2: We had people in Wall Street, New York banks, who had never even experienced a Fed interest rate hike, never in their entire career. It had only been going down. Speaker 5: And so that encouraged them to take all of those risks. They were making all of these loans. They were helping blow up the housing bubble. Speaker 8: So they put money in the economy and the Fed and everybody looks, the government's rich now and this sort of thing. And before you knew it, there was a big bubble and the bubble was supported by people who wanted a house and get their interest rates low. Speaker 4: Now what do you do then? If you try to increase the money supply, that pushes prices up. That causes the worse inflation. On the other hand, if you try to tighten money, that causes a recession, and and that turns into a full blown downturn. Speaker 9: This could be the most serious recession in decades, and that means life, as most Americans know it, is about to change, in some cases dramatically. Speaker 4: What happened in 02/2008 was that some of the big investment banks, the ones that are most closely tied into government, were affected. And those people are the movers and the shakers. They're the ones that contribute to campaigns. Speaker 2: The Fed undertook these policies as an emergency measure to address what they themselves had all created. Speaker 3: 02/2008 brought a new crisis and the Federal Reserve started using new tools and programs it had not used before. Speaker 4: They made it seem like this is a crisis that's affecting all of us. Speaker 5: So now instead of the Fed targeting a particular federal funds rate or a range of federal funds rates, now the Fed is changing the supply of reserves in the system through open market operations. Speaker 4: And so they came up with all these different ways of injecting new money into the system. Speaker 0: Using partially some tax dollars and some just money printing by the Fed to give all these big banks billions of dollars. Speaker 6: And they started buying, but even more radical than that was they started buying mortgages. They bought the Fed bought mortgages in the form of mortgage backed securities. Speaker 5: They started buying mortgage backed securities as opposed to just government debt. They were intervening in bailing out specific corporations. So it's not surprising Speaker 2: that we saw a big run up. The price went up regardless of the value of the company or the value of the bond or the value of the land or the value of the real estate. Speaker 4: So that was a change where they were brazen about what they were doing, open about picking the winners. They're receiving the new money first, and they're receiving it at lower interest rates than they would have been. Speaker 2: And the Fed, since that time, has been operating with just one new policy, one surprise policy after another. Speaker 3: The Fed's new policies took it deep into previously untouched areas of the economy. This resulted in an everything bubble of inflation where prices for a wide range of assets and goods and services were constantly increasing. Speaker 4: So there's nothing wrong with prices in general going up or down. It's just that when the government is in control of of the money supply, it can use that up and down of prices to benefit certain groups. Speaker 5: In an inflationary environment, your incentives are to consume. Your incentives are to to unload the money as soon as you get it, and go buy things. Any amounts of money that you've accumulated that's not invested or used to buy consumption goods is gonna be losing value in this permanent inflation that we have. Speaker 6: And both the bubble and the problems are really the result of this unprecedented and, in my view, unwise mortgage financing effort of the Fed of making itself into a giant savings and loan. Speaker 5: The way that regular consumers become increasingly indebted, they've got to get those loans from somewhere. And so Wall Street definitely gains as a result of the Fed's money printing. Speaker 0: These bailouts socialize the losses. So they create a system with the banks of the profits are mine, the losses are on you, the taxpayer, and that's horribly destructive of the whole free market system. Speaker 5: So each crisis that they cause gives them a chance to to grow even more. And with each crisis, the Fed is is gaining more and more power. And as they gain more power, they intervene more and create even bigger crises. Speaker 3: As if that wasn't enough, in 2020, the World Health Organization announced a pandemic. Speaker 6: We had a virus go around the world, and much to everybody's surprise, it caused a financial collapse. Speaker 2: Everybody's attention moved completely away from what was going on in the marketplace and in the economy, and everybody was focused solely on the virus and the shutdowns and what was happening to businesses and jobs and the economy. Speaker 4: For a long time, during the lockdown, people didn't really spend that money or they spent it on Amazon and not on brick and mortar shops, and that forced prices up tremendously. Speaker 2: And so it's quite natural that most people associate the recession that we went through at that time with the virus rather than with the Fed. Speaker 3: The government's message was that the global economy was collapsing due to COVID, and the Fed responded with its inflationary tools. We were Speaker 2: headed downhill when COVID hit. And then when COVID hit, well, the government decided to spend trillions of dollars to keep the economy going. And the Fed accommodated that by basically printing trillions of dollars. Speaker 1: So the Fed is a the Fed bought everything that wasn't nailed down and did took a hammer and stripped some of those nails away, it was an all purpose, all front bailout. Speaker 6: But when the crisis was over, they didn't stop. They went right on. Speaker 5: And so now they're lending indirectly to specific companies, and it's it really is a systemization of the, too big to fail concept. Permanently. It's a great example of the way that the Fed has ballooned in power. Speaker 6: But the misconception is that the Fed somehow knows the economic future, the financial future, and therefore knows how to manipulate it through manipulating interest rates, through manipulating supply of money, through buying, as they have bought trillions of dollars of bonds and mortgages. Speaker 3: The Fed's buying had far reaching ramifications for the financial world, but did they consider who else would be affected? Speaker 1: The free market economies are, peopled by human beings. Speaker 5: When you see higher prices at the grocery store, when you see higher energy bills, when when you see higher prices anywhere, you should be thinking about how that loss of your purchasing power is the government's gain. Speaker 0: And so the the Fed induces people to consume now, live for the present, and not worry about the future. Speaker 4: The step by step process by which money spreads throughout the economy and impoverishes the people who get the money late or those people who are retired and on on fixed incomes and never get the new money. Speaker 5: One group that would certainly be harmed would be younger generations. Speaker 4: The people on Main Street didn't get it. They didn't benefit. In fact, they were hurt. Speaker 2: Young people, Gen Z, etcetera, what they're facing is not just a Fed that can inflate the money supply out of thin air and evaporate anything that they've been able to accumulate. Speaker 4: When the Fed increases the money supply, especially in the amounts and the ways that it did so during COVID, that it really redistributes wealth. And it redistributes wealth away from the middle class, away from Main Street towards Wall Street and Silicon Valley. Speaker 3: When wealth shifts this much, Speaker 2: there was always chaos. Everything just sort of broke at the end of COVID. Speaker 8: The big picture there is the monetary system facilitates this continued buildup of the combination of corporations, corporatism, and the government. Speaker 5: What this means is that there's one group who will definitely benefit by acquiring acquiring all of this capital, whereas another group is they always have the the short end of the stick. So you you can definitely see that there are some sectors that are closer to the beginning of this chain of of spending. At the very front is the government. Speaker 0: And then the Fed gets rewarded in in various ways after that. Because the way the Fed finances its own salaries is when it when it buys bonds, it prints up the money, free money, counterfeit money, buys bonds with it. And so that money goes into the banking system. That's how the money supply increases. But in terms Speaker 5: of like, who's first, who's second, who's third, that's not something that we can pinpoint exactly. But we can definitely say that there is a wealth transfer. There are benefits to being at the beginning, and there are costs to being at the end. Speaker 6: Think of the government together as being both the treasury and the Fed. One, so as the Fed loses money and just borrows more money to finance its losses, it's just running up the debt and it's a cost to the taxpayers. Speaker 5: We should definitely be more upset about the institutionalized inflation, the fact that inflation is a permanent feature of our economy. Speaker 3: Using inflation to enrich some while impoverishing others seems to have become the Fed's ultimate weapon. Speaker 1: People feel that inflation, which is a systematic depreciation of the currency. But, to put that in context, the Fed actually intends to cheapen the value of your money. Speaker 0: That's why the politicians like it. And also the Fed they use the Fed as a whipping boy. When things go bad, when the rebel bursts, they call in the chairman of the Fed and they lambast the Fed chairman and and his associates there and and shift the blame to to them. So what what it means Speaker 5: is that we've got this Leviathan central bank. We've got this bank that has taken on huge powers and is always shifting. One implication of that is that it makes it really difficult to predict what's gonna happen because it means that you have to not only forecast the market, but you have to forecast what the Fed is going to do and also how the market will respond to the Fed. Speaker 1: And it's like a mood board, you know. They'll say we expect the inflation rate to be thus. We expect growth to be the following. And it's always wrong because the future is a closed book. Speaker 3: Now it seems like the future of money is ramping up toward a Fed controlled digital currency. Is a central bank a digital currency with its value fixed by the Fed a good thing or a threat? Speaker 5: The Federal Reserve as it exists today has a ton of power, and it would just be magnified tenfold, a hundredfold with a central bank digital currency. Speaker 4: It posed a large threat to American citizens because then they can program these things so that they can neutralize them if you were trying to buy goods that the government doesn't want you to spend money on. Speaker 5: It it means that they could have programs in it. You can buy certain things, but not other things. Speaker 1: A digital currency would be so helpful to the Fed. If they don't like the way you're spending money because they'll see you spend it, that would be the Fed's window into your life. Speaker 5: So if perspective is that in a crisis we need to stimulate spending, we will tax you a certain amount at the end of this time period if you haven't spent your money. So what I think they're doing is they're priming the pump. They're trying to talk about the pros and the cons of the central bank digital currency idea. And I think the idea is for them to roll it out during the middle of some crisis in the future. And people will think back and they'll say, oh yeah, this is fine. Speaker 1: The Feds own digital currency, like Bitcoin without the fund. Speaker 3: With so many ways of manipulating the money supply and financial sector, the Federal Reserve now has far more power than ever before. Speaker 1: So the Fed has virtually nationalized the financial system. Speaker 6: Who approved that? How did that get made formal? The answer is they just said it themselves. Speaker 5: That way the whole system is is sort of a cartel. The whole system is is working together. Speaker 0: It's all kinda like the scene at the end of the movie, The Wizard of Oz, they where the the great wizard is finally there and and everybody's in awe. And then all of a sudden, the curtain is pulled back by the dog, and and you and you see the phoniness of the whole thing. Speaker 3: So the real question is, is the Fed really the fireman or the arsonist? Speaker 2: They come in and say, well, we'll cut interest rates. You know, we'll bail out the banks. We'll, you know, bail out the stock market. We'll bail out foreigners. We'll do all of this. When in effect, they're the arsonists that started the fire to begin with. Speaker 4: It sets the fire by starting off printing new money and injecting it into the economy to drive prices up. Then when it sees prices rising, the Fed itself jumps in and claims that it's trying to balance unemployment and inflation, when in fact it's really not the firemen that's protecting them from the flames of inflation. Speaker 0: And so for hundreds and hundreds of years, people have understood the danger of government control of money. So it makes it uncertain even for an individual when whenever the government creates price inflation and and does that to our money. Speaker 8: What has happened, the leaders in this country, the people who control the financial system and the financial system and the whole works, they work on a basis of immorality. Speaker 4: But it is the arsonist and it continues to be the arsonist in the guise of Speaker 3: a fireman. It's a crazed fireman. The financial world under the Fed seems to have evolved into madness. Is it time for a new approach? Speaker 8: So we live in very, very dangerous times, mainly because we've allowed the Fed to control the world monetary system. And just because you have debt and turn it into money, that does not mean real wealth. Speaker 6: And while they're guessing, they create great inflations and booms and busts. Speaker 3: Inflation, booms and busts. The results of excessive government and the ramifications of these cycles of instability were identified by an influential economist in 1912. Speaker 5: So the boom bust cycle, a term that we use to refer to Austrian business cycle theory, and it was developed by Ludwig von Mises in his book, The Theory of Money and Credit. Speaker 4: Mises was one of the first economists to fully explain that when money is introduced into the economy, prices don't all go up at once, and and and people's incomes don't go all up at once. Speaker 2: So if you have an entity working behind the scenes manipulating the value of that monetary unit, then that's gonna cause, that's naturally gonna cause some kind of trouble. Speaker 5: Basically what it says is that in a unhampered market economy, this works fantastically. So people decide to save and people decide to consume and the balance of that interaction gives us a market interest rate and it gives entrepreneurs good information on what lines of production to pursue. Speaker 4: Austrian business cycle theory doesn't predict the timing. Some people say that's a flaw, but it's not really a flaw because people have free will and they can spend their money or not spend their money as they see fit. Speaker 2: Austrian economists following Mises have always placed a very high priority on money because it's the one thing we all have in common. We all use money. And he realized that central banks in manipulating money and manipulating credit induced this artificial boom. And the consequence of that is the economic bust or what we call now the recession. Murray Rothbard expanded on Mises' Austrian School economics. In his works, he advanced the idea of limiting government intervention and abolishing fractional reserve banking. The importance that Austrian economics brings to the general economic table is that we think money is very, very important and the natural stability of the monetary unit is very important for everyone in society. Speaker 0: Murray Rothbard, who was one of the cofounders really of the Mises Institute here, once said that, you know, if government got in the business of making shoes early on, people would be saying, well, who would make shoes? The government has always made shoes. And the the same thing goes for the Fed. A lot of people think, well, yeah, the Fed has always been in control of the money supply, but it hasn't. Speaker 4: Rothbard even more pointed out that an increase in the money supply does not benefit society. It benefits some at the expense of others. Speaker 5: Whenever you're in control of the printing press, whenever you're in control of how much money there is, you're going to create winners and losers. Speaker 4: There is no social benefit from increasing the money supply. Any money supply is sufficient to allow people to trade for all the goods and services they want to, but just at a lower price. Speaker 3: Will government leaders ever do what it takes to stop the inflation? Speaker 4: Inflation is what you see on an everyday basis when you go to the supermarket, when you stop at the gas station, it's all around you. Speaker 8: The real evil tax is the inflation tax because it hits the middle class and the poor. Speaker 2: When I look out there, I see a lot of government debt, a lot of private debt, and a lot of things working against the free market economy, working against free trade, an inability and almost an unwillingness on the part of the players in the system to seek out peaceful, cooperative solutions to emerging problems and rather to use those emerging problems to their politic their own political benefit. Speaker 3: What should we do with the Fed? The country's political central bank. Speaker 0: We went for a long time without without a central bank. And, you know, think about it. Let's put all the money in the hands of politicians in a secret organization that is never allowed to be audited. Speaker 8: The government's a mess. The fan's a mess. Speaker 5: We should get back to a system in which money is out of the hands of government. Speaker 0: It's a political game. That's why whenever a congressperson like Ron Paul would argue for auditing the Fed, the entire banking industry would rally around and send millions to both political parties in Washington to kill it, to kill the bill, to audit the Fed. Speaker 8: No. We we don't need a Fed. Speaker 5: And what that would mean is we would get the money supply that the the market can bear and the market would produce. If you Speaker 8: mess around with interest rates, people do dumb things. They buy too much stuff or build too many buildings or cars, and that's through the creation of the bubble, and that always has to has to be corrected. Speaker 4: A life without a Fed is constant growth and slowly falling prices, which benefits the entire population, including people on fixed incomes, who are really hurt by inflation. Take away the power of the Fed to ever buy anything again, because that's how they print new money, by buying assets in the market. Speaker 2: We can end the Fed's power and activities today. We can take them completely out of interest rate setting policies. We can take them completely out of the money creation process today. Speaker 6: And you, Fed, you're not the decision maker here. You shall not drown mankind in a flood of paper money. Speaker 0: If Mises were here today, I think he would be full on in support of ending the Fed altogether. Speaker 1: If the Fed ended and with it ended the pure paper dollar, it would be left to all of us politically and individually to evolve a new system. Speaker 6: What kind of money would the people like imposed on them? Well, how about sound money? Speaker 4: People should be able to write contracts in terms of monies, gold, silver, foreign currencies, that that they voluntarily agree upon. Speaker 6: So you can view this as very closely intertwined with the freedom and independence and responsibility of the citizens having a sound money on one side versus a perpetually inflating currency which favors the ever expanding power and spending by deficit, financed by inflation, of the government. So this is really a profoundly important political and constitutional question. Speaker 4: I think these are steps back to the gold standard or a commodity money standard. Speaker 1: The gold standard, was, was a constraint. It was the marker of the government's commitment expressed or implicit to honor the integrity of the currency. Now I say integrity. Integrity is a moralistic work, but money is work, and work is heartbeats, and heartbeats are finite. Speaker 8: You have to take a life risking surgery to get your cancer out of your belly, and that's the only thing that we can do. Economically, you just get rid of the Fed if you want to have sound money and a healthy economy. That doesn't sound so bad.

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

Funniest people are those who think the '20 crash was caused by a virus. The banking system was already collapsing Sep '19 forcing the Fed to start REPO interventions like '08. The system only collapsed when the Fed pulled REPO away 2023 is the same game plan with BTFP & OCE 🀫

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

The Fed admits guilt of causing the 2020 crisis by pulling the Emergency Repo rug at exactly the worst possible time, despite the banking system being on life support since Sep 2019 The Repo rug was pulled right after Powell attended the Bezos party 🀫 https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/what-happened-in-money-markets-in-september-2019-20200227.html

What Happened in Money Markets in September 2019? The Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Washington DC. federalreserve.gov
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 4:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Breaking: US Treasury Bond Market in the Red. Implications: Total losses for investors, economic crisis, banking collapse, policy chaos, market instability. Confidence in financial system destroyed. Dollar's reserve status undermined. Deep recession or depression possible. Gold standard and currency parity discussed. Urgency to protect savings and choose Basel 3 Compliant banks emphasized. Federal Reserve and global central banks thrown into chaos. Extreme volatility and disruption in debt markets predicted. Countdown on qofficial.net mentioned. Janet Yellen's implication and potential domino effect highlighted. Stay informed.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

🚨Breaking: The US Treasury Bond Market In The Red What are the implications? Investors Losses: Well anyone holding US debt would suffer total losses, including central banks, pension funds, governments etc. This would destroy confidence in the financial system. Is this still a November To remember? Everyone who has been asking about 401ks or retirement here is your answer. Well let's see my fellow compatriots. S Economic Crisis: The US government's ability to fund operations and debt would be crippled, undermining the dollar's reserve status. This could cause a deep recession or depression. Remember we are going on the Gold Standard. The dollar has to lose value in order for the Iraqi Dinar to become atleast 1:1. This is about currency parity. Equal playing field. Banking collapse: Banks hold huge Treasury reserves - deleting this asset base would trigger bank failures, bail-ins, and potentially wipe out savings. Which is why I told you all to put your money in Basel 3 Compliant banks for months. Which is why I said certain banks do not have until 2025 to implement ISO-20022. I stand by that. This is not an olive basket. 2025 is for those banks left over. Policy Chaos - The Federal Reserve and central banks worldwide would be thrown into chaos as a core pillar of global finance vanished. Emergency measures will not do them any justice in this case. Why do you think I have been constantly telling you all that the US Treasury have been running things? This situation was planned. How? Devolution. Where have you heard over the years that gold will end the Federal Reserve? Market Instability - Taking the world's benchmark risk-free asset off the books would ofcourse massively disrupt debt markets and interbank lending, creating extreme volatility. US Treasurys are considered the safest asset out there. They are foundation that the whole house of cards is built on. If you remove that foundation, the stability of all the markets gonna come crumbling down understand? People that countdown on this website (https://qofficial.net/password) is looking really interesting right about now. Especially if this goes through as Janet Yellen has implied. A week to remember? It's definitely looking like this. Because remember some weeks back I told you all the 1st domino for the public would be this month? What have I been wrong about this far? I will post the document below.

Coming soon | Q This website is coming soon. qofficial.net
View Full Interactive Feed