reSee.it - Related Post Feed

cafelockedout
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 3:44 AM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 8:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In New Zealand, a whistleblower has emerged, revealing that the authorities were aware of the deadly consequences of the jab. Shockingly, it is claimed that on certain days, one in three individuals who received the vaccine died. Additionally, an FOI request exposed that thousands of politicians and judges were secretly exempt from the vaccine mandate imposed on the public. This raises questions about the extent of their knowledge. The situation prompts us to ponder whether they have the right to decide our fate.

@cafelockedout - Cafe Locked Out (KULTURE) 8:32

The New Zealand Whistler Blower. They knew it was deadly and they kept lying "The Evidence coming out will state that on some days 1 in 3 people who went to get jabbed Died." This is from Liz Gunn in New Zealand. She was contacted by a data analyst who could no longer handle just sitting back and watching the democide. Remember too, a Kiwi FOI shows that eleven thousand politicians judges and the like, were secretly exempt and yet they pushed it on the public and the kids. So how much did they know? . But oh well. Don't they have a right to cull us? @dragonfishy

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the mortality rates in New Zealand from 2012 to 2022. They highlight the increase in deaths, particularly after the vaccine rollout in 2022. The speaker mentions that the spikes in deaths are usually due to the winter flu season. They also show a heat map of the top 20 sites with excess mortality rates, with 10 of them located in Christchurch. The speaker claims to be the only database administrator with access to this data in New Zealand due to the country's small size and good IT infrastructure.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We got COVID, which I'll refer to in another graph. But 2022, check this out. Right? Speaker 1: This is April 20, 2022. Speaker 0: Just after the vaccine rollout, yes. So we've got. Speaker 1: We've got 151, 128, 137 dead. Wait a minute. This is this is every day. Speaker 0: Yeah. So as you see now from this point onwards, this Just keeps going. Speaker 1: Almost every day. Speaker 0: And going. Speaker 1: Here it is now every single day. Going. Speaker 0: And going. Speaker 1: And they're all above 120. Speaker 0: Yeah. Still 2022 going. Going. Speaker 1: So already to Evidence of excess death in the senate. This is Speaker 0: just a quality. A 100%. Wow. Speaker 1: Wow. And still it's going. Speaker 0: Still going. Now we're at 2,000 So on the left there, the big red line, It's the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's a a lot of people died on that day. From there, the line where you get more than 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got one. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. And we're looking at the Mortality rates of each site. So from that, we look at the top 20. And then if I that's the heat map. And if this is a normal debt distribution, you would see more in the big data centers. This is a this is not normal to see them on the South Island Platelet because the South Island is not densely populated. So for the excess, it should reflect mortality rates across the whole country it. Which is the background motel rates, something like 1.75%. Some of these rates will shock you. So this is the slide, but it's in Google Maps now. So, again, 20 worst sites for excess mortality rights. And as you see, 10 of them are in Christchurch alone. Wow. Yeah. Speaker 1: So we don't have potentially the data. Speaker 0: Nobody knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: To Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is the tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system And as be the only data administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, it. You'd need a whole team of people, so it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one, and I think
KimDotcom
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 2:21 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 5:59 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

New Zealand Covid-19 vaccination database admin turns whistleblower and reveals how many people died after taking bad batches of the Pfizer vaccine. This must be investigated. If this data of mass vaccine casualties is real there must be accountability. https://t.co/2QjkmRGJca

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system and their discovery of discrepancies in the data regarding deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They explain that they have access to this data as the sole database administrator in New Zealand. They provide information on the top ten batches with high mortality rates and mention a website where people can find their specific batch information. The speaker also highlights the high mortality rates among certain vaccinators and questions the reasons behind it. They present a chart showing the timeline of deaths in New Zealand, with a significant increase in deaths even after the decline of COVID-related deaths. The speaker emphasizes that the death rate in New Zealand has been consistently rising.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I was involved with building a project, helped with, implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called, a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get They get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it. I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates, of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. Speaker 1: So what did you notice when you first started to look At this data as you were building it? Speaker 0: Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that, people would die almost straight away after being injected. So That sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I I love science. It's My all time favorite. I've got a I've got a master's degree in science. Oh, no but no one knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one. Speaker 1: A lot of people want to know what was my batch? What can you do to help keep us with that? Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top Ten, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate. And I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but You can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn't be too difficult. Speaker 1: Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that's only the top Tien, I want to know my batch. What would you advise? Speaker 0: Yep. You can do that. There's, there's a website, find my batch for the whole world that can actually find that. And I we can list this on, a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches Just so far, New Zealand, a 119 Speaker 1: Of the Pfizer? Speaker 0: Of the Pfizer. Actually, not of all of them because we have We have Moderna. We have AstraZeneca. We've but they're only few and far between. Mostly, it's Pfizer. Mostly, it's Pfizer in New Zealand. Speaker 1: So people can find that? Yep. Find my batch? Speaker 0: Yes. They should be able to. Speaker 1: Yes. Hello? Speaker 0: So what I did was our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: death There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was, are the vaccinators themselves, what are they doing? Are we looking at some who I've got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators Who have the highest ratios of mortality? Speaker 1: For privacy reasons, We have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. Speaker 0: We have to. Speaker 1: We have. Yeah. So we've just called it Vaccinator 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one This vaccine added 246 people, and 60 of them are no longer with us. Speaker 1: That is nearly 25%. One in 4. Speaker 0: Nearly 1 in 4 that that person's vaccinated is dying dead. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, But this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, But we point 7. Speaker 1: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. Yeah. So it looks then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people's bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 by vaccinated, the 3rd highest Vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 0: Yes. And unless they they go around, terribly ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, Then there is no other explanation for this then, and why would they give them that anyway? You know? It doesn't make any sense. The vaccine is meant to Protect those people. On the left there, the big red line, is the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's A lot of people died on that day. From there, the next line where you get more than a 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got 1. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster, that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. Then The next red one, the Christchurch massacre, which was in 2019 in March. But from that, you get a a cluster in 2020, a whole bunch there. May have been another bad flu season. We don't know. But then from 2021, you see A black line there appearing, and then it's like a flick of a switch. Suddenly, the black lines get closer together, And there's more of them. Very thick black lines there. So this this one here, Peak deaths was COVID with or from COVID, but then the deaths from COVID, if you look at the Worldometer website, it correlates to that. That was the same time, and they said that over 60 people died with or from COVID. Then after that, it suddenly suddenly drops off. So after that, you only get a couple of people a day dying with or from COVID. So if you if you go back to The chart there, in that case, you would you would expect to see the black lines disappear because no one's dying from COVID anymore. Right? But you're not. Yeah. Absolutely not. You're seeing the black lines. There are more people dying than ever before. These are the biggest number of deaths we've seen in history of New Zealand. The death rate has gone up 6%, 8% year on year. Even after COVID wasn't a thing. The death rate is still going up. And that's illustrated here by these black lines which are still going on.
wolsned
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 2:31 PM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 4:58 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

The New Zealand vaccine database whistle-blower on vaccine deaths, injuries, payments, and political exemptions, talks to Liz Gunn. 'people were dying as soon as the were vaccinated' This is MASSIVE. Please repost. https://t.co/QJgY6dEycI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system in New Zealand. They noticed discrepancies in the data, specifically a high number of deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They provide charts showing the top ten batches with high mortality rates and mention a website called "Find My Batch" where people can find information about their specific batch. The speaker also highlights the high mortality rates among certain vaccinators. They mention various spikes in deaths over the years, including the COVID-19 pandemic, but note that the death rate has continued to increase even after COVID-19.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I was involved with building a project, helped with, implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called, a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get They get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it. I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates, of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. Speaker 1: So what did you notice when you first started to look At this data as you were building it? Speaker 0: Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that, people would die almost straight away after being injected. So That sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I I love science. It's My all time favorite. I've got a I've got a master's degree in science. Oh, no but no one knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one. Speaker 1: A lot of people want to know what was my batch? What can you do to help keep us with that? Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top Ten, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate. And I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but You can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn't be too difficult. Speaker 1: Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that's only the top Tien, I want to know my batch. What would you advise? Speaker 0: Yep. You can do that. There's, there's a website, find my batch for the whole world that can actually find that. And I we can list this on, a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches Just so far, New Zealand, a 119 Speaker 1: Of the Pfizer? Speaker 0: Of the Pfizer. Actually, not of all of them because we have We have Moderna. We have AstraZeneca. We've but they're only few and far between. Mostly, it's Pfizer. Mostly, it's Pfizer in New Zealand. Speaker 1: So people can find that? Yep. Find my batch? Speaker 0: Yes. They should be able to. Speaker 1: Yes. Hello? Speaker 0: So what I did was our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: death There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was, are the vaccinators themselves, what are they doing? Are we looking at some who I've got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators Who have the highest ratios of mortality? Speaker 1: For privacy reasons, We have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. Speaker 0: We have to. Speaker 1: We have. Yeah. So we've just called it Vaccinator 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one This vaccine added 246 people, and 60 of them are no longer with us. Speaker 1: That is nearly 25%. One in 4. Speaker 0: Nearly 1 in 4 that that person's vaccinated is dying dead. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, But this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, But we point 7. Speaker 1: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. Yeah. So it looks then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people's bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 by vaccinated, the 3rd highest Vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 0: Yes. And unless they they go around, terribly ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, Then there is no other explanation for this then, and why would they give them that anyway? You know? It doesn't make any sense. The vaccine is meant to Protect those people. On the left there, the big red line, is the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's A lot of people died on that day. From there, the next line where you get more than a 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got 1. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster, that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. Then The next red one, the Christchurch massacre, which was in 2019 in March. But from that, you get a a cluster in 2020, a whole bunch there. May have been another bad flu season. We don't know. But then from 2021, you see A black line there appearing, and then it's like a flick of a switch. Suddenly, the black lines get closer together, And there's more of them. Very thick black lines there. So this this one here, Peak deaths was COVID with or from COVID, but then the deaths from COVID, if you look at the Worldometer website, it correlates to that. That was the same time, and they said that over 60 people died with or from COVID. Then after that, it suddenly suddenly drops off. So after that, you only get a couple of people a day dying with or from COVID. So if you if you go back to The chart there, in that case, you would you would expect to see the black lines disappear because no one's dying from COVID anymore. Right? But you're not. Yeah. Absolutely not. You're seeing the black lines. There are more people dying than ever before. These are the biggest number of deaths we've seen in history of New Zealand. The death rate has gone up 6%, 8% year on year. Even after COVID wasn't a thing. The death rate is still going up. And that's illustrated here by these black lines which are still going on.
james_freeman__
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 5:06 PM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 1:33 AM

@james_freeman__ - James Freeman

🚨 The New Zealand health records database shows clusters of jab deaths linked to dates and locations In one example more than 50 people who were jabbed on the same day in the same location all died within months of each other WE ARE COMING FOR THEM! @LizGunn18 https://t.co/KL7EhhoE8s

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the significance of leaked health records in New Zealand, which contain information about COVID-19 vaccinations and health outcomes. They question the trustworthiness of published data and highlight the high number of excess deaths among young people worldwide. The speaker suggests that governments refuse to investigate these deaths due to potential backlash. They criticize the coercion and mandates surrounding vaccination, claiming it is an experimental treatment with a high survival rate. The speaker also mentions the monitoring of journalists and politicians who questioned the situation. They believe that a small group of people planned the pandemic and consider the vaccine a bioweapon. The speaker questions why the vaccine was given to children despite knowing it didn't stop transmission. They express concerns about potential long-term effects on fertility and mention the mRNA's distribution in the body causing adverse reactions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the reason he needs protecting is because of the significance of the dataset that he has leaked, which contains the health records of the entire population of New Zealand. It includes all information about the Jabs and subsequent health Outcomes. It is not the linked, anonymized data that is published by statistics offices around the world. No. This is the actual data. And this is important for many reasons because as the work by Hart, here in the UK shows, there are many problems with published data that mean it simply cannot be trusted. And what about all of the excess deaths of young people around the world? People dying of heart attacks, strokes and other diseases that we've never witnesses witnessed in these age groups before. Excess deaths have been persistently high across countries with high vaccine uptake rates. What is causing this? People in their twenties and thirties dying of these conditions is not normal. But governments continue to ignore the deaths despite being concerned by every single COVID death at the time. It just doesn't make sense, ladies and gentlemen, unless, that is, you consider the possibility that the reason governments are refusing to investigate excess deaths is because they know what we will find out. They know it would open the gates of hell and unleash a furious backlash from the public. There would be calls for trials of those involved And there would likely be civil unrest. And, justifiably, given the coercion, bullying and mandates Used to force 1,000,000, maybe billions, around the world to get an experimental new treatment for an illness with a 99.98 survival rate, which, by the way, that was a figure that was known at the time. We've learned from Pfizer itself recently in the European Parliament that Pfizer and others never tested for transmission before going to market, and yet the politicians and media told us that we had to take it to protect our loved ones and wider society. Protect granny is what they told us. They freaking mandated it in many countries so that people lost their jobs and their livelihoods if they didn't get it. Our leaders indemnified big pharma manufacturers and then proceeded to ignore The vaccine injured and bereaved, they were told to shut up and spreading anti vax mis misinformation. People injured by the jabs were called anti vaxxers, which is ironic given that their injuries were caused by getting the jabs. I've met hundreds of them in the UK. We also have it confirmed. We knew at the time, but we've now got it confirmed that the UK military, the 77th Brigade, monitored and tracked journalists and politicians like me who questioned what was going on, information that was used by our government to then cancel and silence these people. I've had it confirmed via a subject access request that the UK government was monitoring my online activity and was producing reports on me. And, as many of you know, this is the tip of the iceberg in terms of the heinous things that they have done to their own citizens. We have also learned how COVID, was worked on in labs using gain of function in techniques, all funded by the chief medical officer in the US, the very person, put in that position to protect systems, Anthony Fauci, along with the US government in countries like China, because that work was banned in the US for good reason. So let's be clear. It is my judgment that there are a small number of people in this world who planned this whole thing. The release of the virus, the use of totally flawed PCR tests to inflate its prevalence, the bullying and mandating of the vaccine, which, let's be clear, is a dangerous experimental new treatment based upon a technology that has never been used on populations before. It is my opinion that this treatment is a bioweapon. For what ends, I do not know. But I've seen enough evidence now to convince me of that. And finally, the most powerful piece of evidence, for me, that shows beyond doubt that something has gone terribly, terribly wrong, is staring us right in the face. It is irrefutable and that is this. Given they knew the jabs did not stop transmission, Given they knew that healthy children are not at risk from the virus. Given they knew that this was a new experimental treatment based upon a new technology that had not been tested properly. Given all of this, why did they give it to the children? Why did they push it on them? Children are the ones in society that we, as adults, normally protect. Why would they do la do that unless there is another reason they're not telling us about? Remember, they knew full well it didn't stop transmission. So why give it to the children when they didn't need it, and it was a new technology that hadn't been tested properly. Remember, the average age of death from COVID was higher than the overall average age for all cause mortality. For me, these facts show something is seriously wrong. And we're going to learn, Or are we going to learn that future generations cannot have children? Because study after study now has shown How the jabs messed around with women's menstrual cycles. We know that the mRNA does not stay in the arm as they claimed. It travels around the body and replicates itself in muscles and tissue around the body. And that our bodies then attack These muscles and tissues, which is why the jabs cause myocarditis.
stkirsch
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 5:47 AM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 7:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Te Whatu Ora investigates a health worker spreading Covid-19 vaccine misinformation. Despite clear data, New Zealand's Ministry of Health denies the evident truth. Shockingly, around 12,000 deaths in NZ are attributed to the vaccine, surpassing Covid fatalities. The corrupt officials are disregarding this information, as renowned epidemiologist Harvey Risch confirms the vaccine's alarming impact. The public deserves transparency, not deception.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

“Health worker spreads Covid-19 vaccine misinformation: Te Whatu Ora launches employment investigation,” New Zealand ministry of health response is to deny what is obvious to anybody skilled in the art. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/health-worker-spreads-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation-te-whatu-ora-launches-employment-investigation/ZN3KEA5V7ZFEHHUQLR56Z57AZY/

NZ Herald - Breaking news, latest news, business, sport and entertainment - NZ Herald Latest breaking news articles, photos, video, blogs, reviews, analysis, opinion and reader comment from New Zealand and around the World - NZ Herald nzherald.co.nz

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

The data clearly shows massive numbers of people have died from vax in New Zealand, roughly 12,000 people, far more than the number of people who died from Covid. Whoops. How long will they continue to try to fool the public?

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

The New Zealand ministry of health officials are corrupt. Harvey Risch, one of the worlds top epidemiologist, validated that the NZ data shows that the vaccine is killing massive numbers of people.

robinmonotti
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 11:51 AM
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 10:06 AM

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

"People were dying almost straight away after being injected.." New Zealand Covid19 "vaccine" database administrator. https://t.co/xoCsZC9Qkt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system and noticing discrepancies in the data regarding deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They explain their unique position as the sole database administrator in New Zealand and their ability to access and analyze the information. The speaker shares a chart showing the top ten batches with high death counts and mentions a website where people can find their batch information. They also highlight the high mortality rates among certain vaccinators. The speaker questions the reasons behind these deaths and emphasizes that the vaccine is meant to protect people. They analyze a timeline of deaths in New Zealand, noting spikes during flu seasons and the impact of COVID-19. The speaker concludes that the death rate in New Zealand has increased even after COVID-19.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I was involved with building a project, helped with, implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called, a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get They get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it. I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates, of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. Speaker 1: So what did you notice when you first started to look At this data as you were building it? Speaker 0: Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that, people would die almost straight away after being injected. So That sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I I love science. It's My all time favorite. I've got a I've got a master's degree in science. Oh, no but no one knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one. Speaker 1: A lot of people want to know what was my batch? What can you do to help keep us with that? Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top Ten, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate. And I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but You can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn't be too difficult. Speaker 1: Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that's only the top Tien, I want to know my batch. What would you advise? Speaker 0: Yep. You can do that. There's, there's a website, find my batch for the whole world that can actually find that. And I we can list this on, a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches Just so far, New Zealand, a 119 Speaker 1: Of the Pfizer? Speaker 0: Of the Pfizer. Actually, not of all of them because we have We have Moderna. We have AstraZeneca. We've but they're only few and far between. Mostly, it's Pfizer. Mostly, it's Pfizer in New Zealand. Speaker 1: So people can find that? Yep. Find my batch? Speaker 0: Yes. They should be able to. Speaker 1: Yes. Hello? Speaker 0: So what I did was our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: death There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was, are the vaccinators themselves, what are they doing? Are we looking at some who I've got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators Who have the highest ratios of mortality? Speaker 1: For privacy reasons, We have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. Speaker 0: We have to. Speaker 1: We have. Yeah. So we've just called it Vaccinator 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one This vaccine added 246 people, and 60 of them are no longer with us. Speaker 1: That is nearly 25%. One in 4. Speaker 0: Nearly 1 in 4 that that person's vaccinated is dying dead. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, But this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, But we point 7. Speaker 1: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. Yeah. So it looks then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people's bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 by vaccinated, the 3rd highest Vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 0: Yes. And unless they they go around, terribly ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, Then there is no other explanation for this then, and why would they give them that anyway? You know? It doesn't make any sense. The vaccine is meant to Protect those people. On the left there, the big red line, is the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's A lot of people died on that day. From there, the next line where you get more than a 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got 1. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster, that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. Then The next red one, the Christchurch massacre, which was in 2019 in March. But from that, you get a a cluster in 2020, a whole bunch there. May have been another bad flu season. We don't know. But then from 2021, you see A black line there appearing, and then it's like a flick of a switch. Suddenly, the black lines get closer together, And there's more of them. Very thick black lines there. So this this one here, Peak deaths was COVID with or from COVID, but then the deaths from COVID, if you look at the Worldometer website, it correlates to that. That was the same time, and they said that over 60 people died with or from COVID. Then after that, it suddenly suddenly drops off. So after that, you only get a couple of people a day dying with or from COVID. So if you if you go back to The chart there, in that case, you would you would expect to see the black lines disappear because no one's dying from COVID anymore. Right? But you're not. Yeah. Absolutely not. You're seeing the black lines. There are more people dying than ever before. These are the biggest number of deaths we've seen in history of New Zealand. The death rate has gone up 6%, 8% year on year. Even after COVID wasn't a thing. The death rate is still going up. And that's illustrated here by these black lines which are still going on.
KimDotcom
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 5:36 AM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 12:36 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

New Zealand police are raiding the home of the Health NZ whistleblower who leaked Covid-19 vaccine mortality data to the world. I don’t know if the data is real. But the fact that they raid him 2 days after it was leaked shows that the NZ Govt is nervous. https://t.co/aAD2gGYFdq

Video Transcript AI Summary
A whistleblower in New Zealand who exposed COVID lies and worked for the Ministry of Health has had their house surrounded by police. Another person who supported the whistleblower also had their house surrounded. The speaker calls on the new government, particularly Winston Peters, to intervene and ensure their release. They emphasize the importance of standing up for truth and exposing government criminality. The speaker urges people to demand the freedom of the whistleblowers and warns that if they are not supported, tyranny will prevail. They ask for help in contacting Winston Peters and the New Zealand parliament to address this urgent situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Liz Gunn, and this is an emergency call around the world from New Zealand. Today is Sunday, 3rd December 2023. I'm out in the car that we have. I have had a call to say that the whistleblower who has put out the crucial information, exposing the COVID Lies exposing the information that he had working for the Ministry of Health in New Zealand has had his house surrounded by police at 2:15 today. It has been swarming with police. The time now It's almost 5 o'clock. I have not gone public yet because I wanted not to inflame the situation, but why are the police there still. And this, I heard 10 minutes ago. As well as that 10 minutes ago, the 2nd person who backs up that whistleblower. And one of the people who contacted me along with the whistleblower has had her house now surrounded by police. So those 2 people are no longer available to talk to us and I must put this message out to the world. I would remind the new New Zealand government under Luxon that you must get out the truth and show you are different from the tyrannical Ardern government. This is a massive challenge for you. This is where you show New Zealand what kind of a Government you will be. And particularly you, Winston Peters. Winston, I came around to your house on the eve of putting the information out. I reached you by phone on message. I said I have something very important to offer you. You got into government promising New Zealanders that you would stand up for what we call the freedom truth telling movement. That you would put out A full COVID inquiry. The whistleblower tried to reach you as well. I gave him your number, And he said that he would give you all the information. We were both willing to give you the 1st drop and make you the hero politician of the world. We are still willing to do that, but I'm calling on you, Winston. I am calling on you. Help these people. Make sure Luxon calls off the police. Make sure they are freed immediately. Make sure that this whistleblower is honored as a New Zealand hero for telling the people of the world the truth. The eyes of the world are upon New Zealand, Winston Peters. Not only that. On a personal note, Winston, you know, as I do. My father in the eighties stood by you when no one would listen to you, when you wanted to get the wine box information out. That involved A whistleblower. It was my father who advised Peter Williams to also stand next to you. And it was they who said to the the braying press, wanting your blood, Winston should be honored for putting this story out. Well, here it is, Kamically, now I call on you to return that favor that my father did for you. And beyond that Winston, I did an Credible interview for you at the beginning of the election campaign that helped you get into government. There is no doubt about that. I am asking you, Winston, show that you really meant what you said when you stood in this election and got all those freedom votes. Beyond that, New Zealand and the world. You must send messages to this new government under Christopher Luxon, care of The New Zealand parliament in Wellington, around the world demanding that the whistleblowers be freed and me too if they come for me. This is absolute tyranny. There are 2 things at play here. Yes. The Ministry of Health data is important to protect the privacy, but there is a greater importance. The greater importance is if a government is shown to be criminal, then it is absolutely essential that the people of that country find a way to expose that criminality. And that is what I have done here as a reporter, as a journalist. That is a journalist's role and that is what the whistle blowers have done. That is what whistle blowing is about. This is major criminality on a level of Watergate. It's also major truth telling showing the world what has been done in terms of murder around the world. You either stand by these whistleblowers or you are going to see this sort of tyranny come to your home, your door in future years. And if not you, the doors of your children, we will all be prisoners in future years if the world does not stand by and with and stand up for these whistleblowers. Help New Zealand. We are in dire straits if this new government perpetrates the tyranny and brutality of Jacinda Ardern's ghastly government. This is the challenge. This is when it really counts. Please help contact Winston Peters, care of the New Zealand parliament. Demand that he stands up as well. It is crucial. It is crucial that they are freed.
liz_churchill10
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 5:55 AM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 6:12 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

EMERGENCY CALL from New Zealand. My post from 2 days ago showing evidence of State-sanctioned MURDER of their Citizens from the ‘Covid Vaccine’ presented by the only person that had the Death Statistics…has his home surrounded by the Police. https://t.co/lFED0mwy3g

Video Transcript AI Summary
A whistleblower in New Zealand who exposed COVID lies and worked for the Ministry of Health has had their house surrounded by police. Another person supporting the whistleblower has also had their house surrounded. The speaker urges the new government, particularly Winston Peters, to intervene and ensure the release of these individuals. They emphasize the importance of standing up for truth and exposing government criminality. The speaker calls on the public to demand the freedom of the whistleblowers and warns that if they are not supported, tyranny will prevail. They urge everyone to contact Winston Peters and the New Zealand parliament to take action.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Liz Gunn, and this is an emergency call around the world from New Zealand. Today is Sunday, 3rd December 2023. I'm out in the car that we have. I have had a call to say that the whistleblower who has put out the crucial information, exposing the COVID Lies exposing the information that he had working for the Ministry of Health in New Zealand has had his house surrounded by police at 2:15 today. It has been swarming with police. The time now It's almost 5 o'clock. I have not gone public yet because I wanted not to inflame the situation, but why are the police there still. And this, I heard 10 minutes ago. As well as that 10 minutes ago, the 2nd person who backs up that whistleblower. And one of the people who contacted me along with the whistleblower has had her house now surrounded by police. So those 2 people are no longer available to talk to us and I must put this message out to the world. I would remind the new New Zealand government under Luxon that you must get out the truth and show you are different from the tyrannical Ardern government. This is a massive challenge for you. This is where you show New Zealand what kind of a Government you will be. And particularly you, Winston Peters. Winston, I came around to your house on the eve of putting the information out. I reached you by phone on message. I said I have something very important to offer you. You got into government promising New Zealanders that you would stand up for what we call the freedom truth telling movement. That you would put out A full COVID inquiry. The whistleblower tried to reach you as well. I gave him your number, And he said that he would give you all the information. We were both willing to give you the 1st drop and make you the hero politician of the world. We are still willing to do that, but I'm calling on you, Winston. I am calling on you. Help these people. Make sure Luxon calls off the police. Make sure they are freed immediately. Make sure that this whistleblower is honored as a New Zealand hero for telling the people of the world the truth. The eyes of the world are upon New Zealand, Winston Peters. Not only that. On a personal note, Winston, you know, as I do. My father in the eighties stood by you when no one would listen to you, when you wanted to get the wine box information out. That involved A whistleblower. It was my father who advised Peter Williams to also stand next to you. And it was they who said to the the braying press, wanting your blood, Winston should be honored for putting this story out. Well, here it is, Kamically, now I call on you to return that favor that my father did for you. And beyond that Winston, I did an Credible interview for you at the beginning of the election campaign that helped you get into government. There is no doubt about that. I am asking you, Winston, show that you really meant what you said when you stood in this election and got all those freedom votes. Beyond that, New Zealand and the world. You must send messages to this new government under Christopher Luxon, care of The New Zealand parliament in Wellington, around the world demanding that the whistleblowers be freed and me too if they come for me. This is absolute tyranny. There are 2 things at play here. Yes. The Ministry of Health data is important to protect the privacy, but there is a greater importance. The greater importance is if a government is shown to be criminal, then it is absolutely essential that the people of that country find a way to expose that criminality. And that is what I have done here as a reporter, as a journalist. That is a journalist's role and that is what the whistle blowers have done. That is what whistle blowing is about. This is major criminality on a level of Watergate. It's also major truth telling showing the world what has been done in terms of murder around the world. You either stand by these whistleblowers or you are going to see this sort of tyranny come to your home, your door in future years. And if not you, the doors of your children, we will all be prisoners in future years if the world does not stand by and with and stand up for these whistleblowers. Help New Zealand. We are in dire straits if this new government perpetrates the tyranny and brutality of Jacinda Ardern's ghastly government. This is the challenge. This is when it really counts. Please help contact Winston Peters, care of the New Zealand parliament. Demand that he stands up as well. It is crucial. It is crucial that they are freed.
HopeRising19
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 8:24 AM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 10:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A health worker in New Zealand has been arrested and charged for allegedly misusing and disclosing vaccination data, as well as spreading Covid-19 misinformation. The 56-year-old man will appear in court tomorrow. Meanwhile, an injunction has been granted to prevent the publication of the data. In response, others have suggested that the high death rate is due to sampling bias.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

NEW ZEALAND COVID VACCINE WHISTLEBLOWER HAS TONIGHT BEEN ARRESTED AND CHARGED... Te Whatu Ora has been granted an injunction that prevents anyone in New Zealand OR overseas from publishing the data. Quote: A health worker has been arrested and charged after allegedly misusing and disclosing vaccination data, while spreading misinformation about Covid-19, police told 1News this evening. The 56-year-old man will appear in the Wellington District Court tomorrow charged with accessing a computer system for dishonest purposes, police said. It comes after health officials today laid a police complaint against a staff member. In addition, Te Whatu Ora has been granted an injunction that "prevents any publication of the data" by the Employment Relations Authority. However, authorities are still "working to confirm the full extent" of the man's activities. PS I am doing what journalists are supposed to do. I am simply conveying information without an agenda, skew or bias attached. #nz #whistleblower #informedconsent #covidvaccines https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/12/03/health-worker-arrested-after-covid-vax-data-allegedly-misused/

Health worker arrested after Covid vax data allegedly 'misused' The man, 56, is due to appear in court tomorrow charged with accessing a computer system for dishonest purposes. 1news.co.nz

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

@HopeRising19 Just FYI a number of us have worked on this over the last 48 hours and now shown that the explanation for the high death rate is sampling bias (age related) which produced a false 1.47x increase in mortality rate compared to background. @ichudov @profnfenton

stkirsch
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 1:09 PM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 1:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
BREAKING: NZMH admits anonymizing data, preventing reversal. They underestimated us. Statistical fidelity preserved. Truth suppressed? Vaccines' safety data concealed on website. Reference provided for quote. #NZMH #VaccineData #Transparency

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

BREAKING: NZMH admits that we anonymized the data so they can't reverse it. Did they really think they are dealing with amateurs? We preserved the statistical fidelity. Notice how they don't want the TRUTH to come out???

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

If the data shows the vaccines are safe, they would be posting the data on their website. They know full well that the data shows the opposite. That is why they are trying to suppress it.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Here's the reference so you can read the quote: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/te-whatu-ora-granted-urgent-injunction-police-complaint-filed-over-mass-privacy-breach-of-covid-19-vaccination-data-by-former-staff-member/EUKC3NHC6FAOVL2YJSE4GUR6BU/

NZ Herald - Breaking news, latest news, business, sport and entertainment - NZ Herald Latest breaking news articles, photos, video, blogs, reviews, analysis, opinion and reader comment from New Zealand and around the World - NZ Herald nzherald.co.nz
JimFergusonUK
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 5:31 PM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 7:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In New Zealand, concerns arise over mandated vaccinations and their alleged impact on the population. The government's attempts to suppress this information have failed. Reports suggest a significant rise in deaths, possibly linked to the vaccines. Former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, associated with the World Economic Forum, faces criticism. The situation raises questions about depopulation agendas and the use of mRNA technology. Pfizer's involvement is also mentioned. (280 characters)

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Breaking News: The #NewZealand government are desperate to stop this information getting out. They have failed. Massive numbers dying in New Zealand as a result of the mandated vaccinations that were forced on the people by World Economic Forum Cultist #JacindaArdern when she was Prime Minister. #Excessdeaths #DepopulationAgenda #mRNA #CovidShots #VaccineInjuries #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #Pfizer https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731287721350439260?s=20

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the mortality rates of vaccinated individuals. They analyze the data and find that Pfizer's batch number 1 has a 21% death rate among those vaccinated. They also identify the top 10 vaccinators with the highest mortality ratios. One vaccinator has a 25% death rate among those vaccinated. The speakers express concern over these numbers and question what could be causing such high mortality rates. They emphasize that this should never happen and suggest that the vaccines are meant to protect people, not harm them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So people can find that? Yep. Find my badge? Speaker 1: Yes. They should be able to. Yes. Hello? So what I did was our internal batch ID. I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 0: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 1: And so we then look at the percentage ratio. Speaker 0: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 1: Yes, they are. Speaker 0: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% death mortality Speaker 1: rate Speaker 0: from that batch. They are high. Now Speaker 1: There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was other vaccinators themselves. What are they doing? Are we looking at some who have got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators you have the highest ratios of mortality. Speaker 0: For privacy reasons, we have redacted The names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. We have to. We have. Speaker 1: Yeah. So Speaker 0: we've just called it vaccinator 1. Speaker 1: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one has vaccinated 246 people, and 60 of them are now no longer with us. Speaker 0: That is nearly 25%. Speaker 1: 1 in 4. Nearly 1 in 4 That that person vaccinated is right there. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, but this this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, will be 0.75. Speaker 0: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. So it looks then we start to say what is it they were putting into people's bodies Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 By vaccinated, the 3rd highest vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 1: Yeah. And unless they they go around terminally ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, then there is no other explanation for this death. And why would they be doing that anyway? You know, it doesn't make any sense. The box here is meant to protect those people.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Report: Are governments worldwide grappling with an unforeseen crisis linked to COVID-19 vaccines manifesting in an explosion in all cause mortality and excess deaths? Whistle blowers in New Zealand may have uncovered a series of confidential reports suggesting a correlation…

stkirsch
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 1:24 PM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 10:45 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

It doesn't just suggest a problem. It shows there is a problem! The NZMH refuses to talk about the data. Why would they do that if their data is exculpatory??

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Urgent Call for Accountability: Could Jacinda Ardern be Sought for potential Misconduct in Medical Mandate Crisis? As evidence emerges of a potentially explosive leak of highly classified vaccine information that appears to suggest an appalling and significant increase in excess deaths due to the vaccine in New Zealand could the former prime minister be forced to return and account for her administrations actions. Link to explosive testimony of leaded data⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731365553632055464?s=20 The call for the return of Jacinda Ardern the former Prime Minister of New Zealand who some have accused of fleeing abroad amidst a crisis that some suggest she knew would happen involving a mandated Covid vaccination raises significant ethical, legal, and moral questions. Any leader that is accused of knowingly implementing a policy that could cause harm to the populace, is a matter of grave concern and demands accountability. Was the whistle blower Barry Young arrested to avoid a massive scandal involving Ardern⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731632653290344862?s=20 Firstly, from an ethical standpoint, leaders bear a responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of their citizens. Implementing the Covid mandates with knowledge of its potential risks, without transparent communication or consent, violates this fundamental duty. If allegations are true, it's imperative that Ardern faces these accusations and provides explanations for their decisions. Avoiding such scrutiny by fleeing abroad undermines the trust placed in them by the electorate. Legally, every individual, including national leaders, must adhere to the principles of justice and the rule of law. If evidence suggests that a leader knowingly risked public health, they should be subject to legal processes to determine the extent of their liability. Fleeing to avoid such processes is not only a dereliction of duty but also a circumvention of the legal system that they once pledged to uphold. Morally, the act of fleeing in the face of a crisis is a betrayal of the leader's commitment to their nation. Leadership demands facing the consequences of one's actions, especially when those actions have potentially endangered lives. It is a question of moral integrity and the courage to stand by one's decisions, however consequential they may be. Furthermore, the concept of justice and the social contract between a leader and their people necessitates that any leader accused of such serious misconduct must be held accountable. It is a fundamental principle of democratic governance and the rule of law that no individual, regardless of their position, is above accountability. Not even a high priestess of the World Economic Forum Cult is above the law. Did Jacinda Ardern flee New Zealand to avoid facing the repercussions of a harmful mandated medical procedure? There is a compelling argument, both ethically and legally, for her return to face these serious allegations. Such accountability is essential not only for the victims and their families but also for the integrity of the political and legal systems, and the moral fabric of society. Is New Zealand the only country facing this Excess Death Crisis. The facts suggest otherwise⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731287721350439260?s=20 #VaccineInjuries #mRNA #CovidVaccine #ExcessDeaths #DiedSuddenly #Myocarditus #SpikeProtein #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #DepopulationAgenda #TurboCancers

stkirsch
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 3:34 PM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 5:11 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

If the vaccines are so safe, why did Health New Zealand demand that Wasabi and MEGA remove the de-identified data? They already acknowledged there is no PHI in the data. That data isn't theirs. What are they afraid of?

JimFergusonUK
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 4:20 PM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 9:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The rising concerns over depopulation are linked to the World Economic Forum's initiatives, raising questions about their global agendas. Whistle-blower Barry Young suggests a potential connection between Covid vaccines and increased mortality, prompting an investigation. Comparisons to Nazi ideology highlight the dangers of elitism in globalism. The devaluation of human life and disregard for ethics are reminiscent of the Nazis. We must challenge elitist notions and prioritize empathy and ethics in population and resource challenges. The infiltration of globalist groups into governments threatens sovereignty and democratic principles. Concentrated power in global entities undermines local needs and voices. The World Economic Forum's influence raises concerns about undemocratic decision-making.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Are the elitists really looking to reduce the Global population by 6 Billion people? Beyond Boundaries: The Perilous Intersection of Global Elitism and Population Control. The rising concerns about the ideology of depopulation are increasingly linked to the World Economic Forum's (WEF) initiatives, sparking debates over the implications of their global agendas and the potential impact on world population dynamics. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/LarryTaunton/status/1732037113254707512?s=20 In response to alarming revelations emerging from New Zealand, whistle-blower Barry Young has brought to light information that suggests a potentially disturbing connection between the Covid Vaccines and an unprecedented increase in all-cause mortality and excess deaths. This revelation raises urgent questions about the possibility of a sinister agenda by certain global entities. Could there be an intentional effort to significantly reduce the world's population under the guise of public health measures? Such a scenario necessitates a thorough and unbiased investigation into the implications of these findings and their potential global impact. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731365553632055464?s=20 As we navigate the complex and often murky waters of the global population control debate, it's crucial to contextualize this discussion within the broader historical narrative, particularly the chilling parallels with the ideologies espoused by the Nazis. This comparison not only highlights the dangers of elitist attitudes in modern globalism but also serves as a stark reminder of humanity's potential for darkness. The notion of population control, as advocated by figures like Dr. Dennis Meadows, who desires a peaceful and equitable reduction, superficially appears humane. Yet, beneath the surface of these propositions, there lurks a shadow of elitism, reminiscent of the most sinister chapters in human history. Meadows' statement, "I hope that population can be reduced peacefully, in a fair way that everyone can participate in the experience," though seemingly benign, inadvertently echoes a mindset that can quickly spiral into dangerous territory. This is where the haunting specter of Nazi ideology becomes relevant. The Nazis, driven by a perverted sense of elitism and superiority, embarked on one of the most horrific genocides in history, systematically exterminating millions whom they deemed 'unworthy' or 'inferior.' Their actions were underpinned by a chilling belief in racial purity and a deluded view of social engineering, which they believed would lead to an improved human race. The parallels between this and the contemporary rhetoric of elitism in globalist circles, where certain individuals deem themselves fit to decide the fate of populations, are unnervingly clear. Attempts to silence whistle-blower Barry Young.⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731632653290344862?s=20 The psychology behind such elitist views, whether in the context of Nazi Germany or modern globalism, reveals a disturbing willingness to devalue human life. This mindset, which reduces individuals to mere variables in a demographic equation, is dangerously akin to the dehumanizing policies of the Nazis. It reflects a lack of empathy and a disregard for the sanctity of human life, where people are categorized and valued based on arbitrary criteria set by a self-proclaimed elite. The moral implications of drawing parallels between the elitism in globalism and Nazi ideology are profound. They force us to confront uncomfortable truths about human nature and the ease with which a sense of superiority can lead to the justification of atrocities. This historical context serves as a warning of the potential consequences when extreme views on population control are allowed to go unchecked. Moving forward, it is essential to challenge the elitist notions within globalist agendas, advocating for an approach to population and resource challenges that respects human dignity and rights. Solutions must be grounded in empathy and ethics, not in cold calculations or the arrogant presumption of a select few. The lessons from history, especially the horrors perpetrated by the Nazis, must inform our approach, ensuring that respect for every human life remains at the forefront of our global discourse. Why did Jacinda Ardern exempt 11,000 politicians and doctors from getting the vaccine in secret?⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709827142148628638?s=20 We must not forget the involvement in one of the most influential Globalist movements namely the World Economic Forum led by Chairman Klaus Schwab. The infiltration of globalist groups into national governments poses significant risks, fundamentally threatening the sovereignty and democratic principles of nations. Such a scenario can lead to the erosion of local governance and the prioritization of international agendas over national interests. This shift of power can dilute the voices and needs of local populations, as policies are increasingly influenced by a global elite with their own set of priorities and objectives. Moreover, the concentration of power in the hands of a few global entities increases the risk of unchecked, undemocratic decision-making, potentially leading to policies that are not in the best interest of the citizens they are meant to serve. This not only undermines democratic values but also jeopardizes the cultural, social, and economic well-being of nations, creating a global landscape where the diversity of local needs and voices are overshadowed by a homogenized global agenda. Is the World Economic Forum a dangerous death cult?⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709159686325367167?s=20 #DepopulationAgenda #WEF2030Agenda #NewZealand #CovidVaccinations #VaccineInjuries #ExcessDeaths #Myocarditus #SuddenDeath #DiedSuddenly #JacindaArdern #KlausSchwab

@LarryTaunton - Larry Alex Taunton

Abortion – The #1 DEPOPULATION TACTIC In this episode of ‘Ideas Have Consequences,’ we’ll discuss how many have weaponized morality to use abortion as a political ploy and expose the hidden agenda behind it—depopulation. This is the primary objective of the WEF Agenda.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the issue of abortion and the debate within the Republican Party about whether to continue making it a central tenet. They argue against abandoning the pro-life stance and emphasize the importance of standing firm on the issue. The speaker also highlights the influence of the World Economic Forum and their agenda of depopulation. They criticize the idea of compromising on abortion and urge for a clear articulation of principles and a fight for what is right. The speaker concludes by stating that a nation that destroys its children invites the wrath of God.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We become so desensitized to abortion that we forget what it really is. We don't speak of it in terms of a holocaust, but that's what it is. I hope it can be done peacefully. I hope it can be done in a fair way that Everyone could participate in the experience. What is the experience? The annihilation of the world population, reducing it by a minimum of 6,000,000,000 people according to doctor Dennis Meadows. This is central to World Economic Forum thinking, and that is influencing what's going on in the United States. Hunt on this issue? No. Now this was to I don't know who took this video. Whoever he is, I'm very grateful for him, because he's exposing a lot of evil. But here he is. He's he's videoing right outside an abortion clinic, and this abortion doctor comes up to talk to him. Let's Let's listen to this. Speaker 1: Friends, I pray. Sir, you gotta repent, sir. Speaker 2: Stay here. Speaker 1: You gotta repent, sir, for murdering babies. Why? Why? Because it's a sin before God. Speaker 2: Why? Well Stinky breath. Yeah. Speaker 1: Why? It's pretty it's pretty evil of you, sir. Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. And then I hope and pray that you Speaker 1: Well, that's what you do to babies. Speaker 2: Yeah. I love it. Speaker 1: You love it. Speaker 2: Yeah. I do. Speaker 1: Okay. I hope that you come to Christ, sir. Speaker 2: Oh, I'd never go to Christ. Speaker 1: I hope that you come to Christ. Speaker 2: No. I don't go to Christ. Yeah. You I don't listen to Christ. Speaker 1: You you have a darkened heart, sir. Speaker 2: I do have a hard a darkened heart. Yeah. Speaker 1: You have a darkened heart? Speaker 2: I do. I do very, very much. Speaker 1: And you will stand before God in judgment day Speaker 2: on the day. Everyday. Speaker 1: You will stand before God in judgment? Speaker 2: Yes. I will. Everyday. All of the babies that you have, you know. I love it. Yeah. Keep tearing the babies. Yeah. I will. Keep tearing the babies apart. I will. That is the thing. Speaker 1: Keep keep tearing the babies apart. Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Yes, sir. The babies their blood Dreams from the ground. Speaker 0: It's an astonishing video. It's a disturbing video. Here is this abortion doctor. Not ashamed. Not at all. He's celebrating the murdering of unborn children. I love it, he says in a voice that sounds demonic. I never go to Christ. I have a darkened heart. This is what he says. This is like something out of a, out of a horror movie, except it's far worse than a horror movie because horror movies are fake. I mean, they're they're made up stories. We make up stories about, you know, the is it Jason who wears the hockey mask, you know, comes after everybody. Freddy Krueger with his with his, knife fingers, or, you know, whatever it is. Maybe I'm confusing him with Edward Scissorhands. But, anyway, these kind of evil characters, this a real life evil character celebrating celebrating his own dark heart and the murdering of unborn children. Now the reason I wanna talk about abortion today, most of you already are very decided on this issue. I'm not trying to persuade you as to what you should or shouldn't believe on that issue. If it's not clear to you already, I'm probably not gonna make much of a dent there. Rather, what I wanna focus on is the ideas that are driving the Republican Party. Again, this is ideas have consequences, and abortion pro life has been a core principle of the Republican party for decades since Roe v Wade, was became law in 1973, and it has remained a core tenant all of these decades, but now now you have a debate over whether or not Whether or not Republicans should ditch abortion as a central tenet. Maybe we just need to get rid of it. Maybe this is an issue we can't win on. And this is because it is argued that it is an issue that is leading to, democrats sweeping, governor seats and, state, representative, chairs, sweeping, congress, this kind of thing. And so you have an individual like Ann Coulter, and I want to be clear that I like Ann Coulter, but she tweeted this. And it's just shocking to me. Pro lifers are going to wipe out the Republican Party. In addition to losing Ohio, Tuesday night, governor Glenn Youngkin lost big in Virginia because of pro life zealots. A 15 week abortion limit would have been fine with Virginia voters, but Republicans couldn't promise to stop there without risking a primary challenge from full band pro lifers. My number one compromised position still stands. Make abortion illegal only for registered Republicans. In all fairness, Ann Coulter, she's not saying that she is, you know, pro abortion. She's she's a pro lifer. What she's arguing is, again, pragmatism. She is saying, yeah, we'll remain we'll we'll remain a pro life party, but let's let's tone it down. Let's let's soften our demands. Let's let's back off of this issue just a little bit and and and not make it central to who we are. The Republican Party of Lincoln's Day The Republican party of Lincoln today was dealing with a very similar issue, and that was slavery. And it was fracturing the Republican party, because there were those who said, look, slavery is the law of the land in, many of the days within the union. We don't wanna fracture our party. We wanna be able to work with Democrats, you know, across the aisle. This this is gonna lead to a a massive fracture in our country. Let's back off of this issue just a little bit. Let's not make they they argued what Ann Coulter is effectively arguing here, but there were those, the abolitionists, who are very staunch and very clear about who they were morally and said, no. Absolutely not. This cannot be allowed to stand. And if it comes to war, then let it come. Whatever comes, let it come because The enslaving of human beings cannot be allowed within this union. Who are we as a nation if we're allowing this kind of stuff? And that I think is where we need to be as people. It's where we need to be as conservatives whether you're Republican or not, but it is where we need to be as individuals. It's where we certainly where you need to be if you are a Christian. We're not pragmatic in our moral our moral outlook. We're very clear about who we are. And by the way, moral Certainty gives other people confidence. It does. It carries the day, and we're allowing We're allowing the cultural left, not just Democrats in this country, but the cultural left globally to act like they have the moral high ground on issues ranging from depopulation to immigration, to homosexuality, the alphabet mafia agenda, you name it. They're acting like they have the moral high ground. They are the very definition of evil, The very definition of evil, and we need to recapture the spirit, The moral certainty and fortitude of a party that in 18/60 said, no. No. We're not going to remain buddies with people who are of this view. We are not we if it fractures the party, it fractures the party. If it fractures the country, it fractures the country. Let what come come because we're going to stand on this issue. Listen. The Republican party is already hunted on on, economic conservatism. They've all, long ago, have given up on that issue. So I'm just not really clear on what would be left. We've given up on on the alphabet mafia agenda on I mean, there's would be nothing left of conservatism. So we need to be very clear about who we are as a people. Everyone's gonna encounter pain in their life. Questions Deal with the degree of one's pain and the source of one's pain and how we deal with our pain. In this course, I'm speaking very personally about my own pain and some of the lessons that I've learned in coping with pain, how we minister to people with pain. And what kind of perspective are we to have on the big questions that surround pain in human suffering. Why would you take a course like this? Well, presumably, if you haven't suffered In your own life, you will encounter people who do, and undoubtedly, some of them are people who are very near and dear to you. I think it'd be very helpful for you to take a course like this in order to understand what they're experiencing in the way but you minister to people in those kinds of circumstances. So I'd love for you to take this course of mine, and I wanna Tell you this, that when you subscribe to tome, you get access not just to my course, but to more than a 100 other courses that are dealing with very practical issues and assisting you in living and in flourishing. So where can you get this course? Well, you can't get it at Amazon, you can't get it at Apple, you can't get it at Netflix. You can only get it at Thome. So I want you to go to tomeapp.com/pain to learn more about my course. Let's get back to the podcast. Now what happened in Ohio? Well, this is what happened in Ohio. Speaker 3: Abortion is Health care. And abortion access is the law Of the land in Ohio. Speaker 0: This is just a little side note, and there will be some people who think I'm being mean when I say this, but I actually think It's noteworthy from the point of view of who's driving this. Have you noticed that many of the people who are drive not all of them, but many of the people who are pushing the feminist agenda, the radical feminist agenda, the LGBTQ alphabet mafia agenda, abortion, that they're often fat and unattractive. It's startling to me how frequently that's the case. People who you're thinking I mean, What is this likelihood she's going to get pregnant? Some of you are gonna say, Larry, that's so mean. That's so cruel to say something like that. I'm not trying to be mean. I'm not trying to be cruel. Rather, I'm making a sociological observation here that frequently these are individuals in my view. This is a theory. I haven't Haven't done a great big study on this, but in my experience, which is considerable at dealing with these kinds of individuals that they are often people who hate attractive, happy women who are happy as mothers. They're happy as wives. They're happy as women. They're just comfortable as being women. And people People who are like that are often hated by those individuals who for one reason or another feel disenfranchised. They feel like they can't be a part of that crowd, so they're gonna go in the absolute other direction, in order to be you know, Gilbert Hyatt wrote a brilliant little book years ago. He was a Columbia classicist in which he was talking about the, The interesting pattern that we see in monarchies of great kings being followed by mediocre kings, and then a great king and a mediocre king and a great king and a mediocre king. It is theory, which is interesting, is that frequently sons Feeling they could not measure up to the greatness of their fathers decided that they would go on the other direction and become characters instead. They would become They would become the villain. They would become the outlaw, instead of trying to, to live up to something they felt like they couldn't live up to and where they felt they were always in the shadow. They were always going to be, you know, second fiddle to the image of their fathers. So they became something completely different. I think that same kind of phenomenon is at work here in a lot of these kinds of women who hate Pretty women, they hate happy women. They hate mothers. They hate wives. And do you know who happy wives. And do you know who they hate most of all? Children. Children. And that comes out in this. Here you have this woman, she's celebrating this like this a great moral victory. It isn't a great moral victory. And Ann Coulter is saying, hey, let's just punt. Let's just punt on this issue and give Them what they want. No. No. Let's don't give them what they want. Let's expose them for who they are. These are individuals who are talking about killing babies. They're the abortion clinic doctor. Do we wanna give grounds to people like that? That's Joseph Mengele right there in that video. And I think this is extremely important to point this out. Abortion, even for the likes of an Ann Coulter, has become we've become so desensitized to abortion that we forget what it really is. We don't speak of it in in terms of a holocaust, but that's what it is. We don't speak of it in the in terms of murder, but that's what it is. We don't speak of it in terms of slaughter of innocence, but that's what it is. If this were 1933 Germany and we had a political party that was running, would we say, Let's just kinda punt on anti semitism. Let's let's just let's just not make that part of our platform. Let's Let's let the Nazis, the fascists have what they want in regards to that. The killing of Jews. I mean, come on. It's Just really not that big a deal. And by the way, Anne Coulter is pro life. I don't I'm not just trying to trash her here, but I am saying that that kind of opinion is dangerous because what's left? What are we saying when we're done with it? What What is our party actually about? What kind of moral standards do are we actually left with if we take the position that Anne Coulter is advocating here? But we're not pro life anymore. I mean, aren't we just basically Democrats after that? Isn't that what we're left with? I loved what the Babylon Bee tweeted. Just brilliant. Babies alive because of Dobbs ruling. Apologize the Supreme Court ruling that that knocked down, after decades, Roe v Wade. Babies alive because of Dobbs' ruling apologize to Republicans for making it hard to win elections. That's great. Should these should these children apologize? Should we regret that these children are now alive instead of dead? No. We have to have standards. Now some of you are saying, but, Larry, we have to we have to be realistic. We have to We have to win. We have to be what's the idea? What's the word? What's the term? Pragmatic. Well, I agree that the Republican strategy is awful. I do agree with that. It looks it looks something like this. I I decided to to try to illustrate the problem here. And so I I went and found a Band Aid, in the medicine cabinet in my house, and I went out and I found unfortunately, I have a crack in my driveway, And I took this picture. This this is a perfect image of the Republican strategy, and that's because The Republican party is increasingly fractured. It is fractured and loosely held together. And, the 2 groups, the 2 main groups are on the one end, evangelicals and social conservatives on the one side. And on the other side, we have rhinos. We have Mitch McConnell's. We have individual we have Nikki Haley's. We have, Mitt Romneys. We have individuals who are basically Democrats, but fiscal conservatives. That's what they are. They don't really care about these kinds of issues. They're Ukraine doesn't get them too upset. They're not terribly upset about what's happening, in Israel with Hamas. They're individuals for whom government has been a vehicle of self aggrandizement and self enrichment. That's what government has been for them. They they they don't have the, you know, the classic, you know, American view of government that one is a citizen who serves on behalf of the people for a time and then returns home, you know, to the farm, to the homestead. That's not their view. That's not what government is. It's something for their own self aggrandizement, self enrichment, and self empowerment, and protecting their own fiefdoms. And thus, I agree that the Republican strategy on abortion is deeply flawed in part because we are a fractured party, but also because I think the strategy is just wrong. In so far, let me rephrase that. It isn't wrong in a moral sense from on on the pro life side of the party. It is rather that it is not especially effective insofar as I think that rather than, you know, abandoning abortion, I think we need to go all in on abortion, but we Have to get our messaging right. We need to expose who these people are. We need to show these kinds of videos, this this abortion clinic doctor. We need to show who these people really are. If we really think that we can't win on an issue that is so Egregiously, murderous, immoral, evil that we can't win the American population over on an issue like that. Who are we trying to win over? Who What what what kind of people are we trying to appeal to at that point? What are we left with? I mean, we're left with a country of people who are morally void, and I don't believe that's the case in the United States. But I do think that the Democrats have been very active in obfuscating the issue and boring it. You know, some of you will recall, I I I thought this was very interesting when my when my oldest son was at, at Yale Law, he was telling me, you know, dad, we are taught the word he says they would use is to complexify issues. So you take something that's very simple like abortion. I mean, it's murder. I mean, you are ending a life. That's what it is. And he says, we're taught to complexify it, to obfuscate, to blur the lines, to make it very unclear as to what it is. Now I wanna be I wanna be very clear on this point. My son is a a very strong, evangelical Christian, a bible believing Christian. So he does not buy into to that view at all, but rather he was learning what their strategy was. He was putting arrows into his own quiver to fire back at them as we hoped, of course, that he would, but he's saying the strategy is to blur everything, to Complexify it so that you don't really feel that you are competent to adjudicate the issue. You need an expert to come in and say, when does life begin? Gosh. I don't know. Oh, this is health care. Did you hear the woman say that? Abortion is health care. They have discovered that is a winning term for them. It's lying. It's 100% lying, but they have learned that that phrase is gaining ground for them. In the same way that in the nineties, the, a homosexual agenda discovered that if they could pass off gay marriage as a civil right. If they could attach their sorted movement to, that of Martin Luther King Junior that the American people would look the other way because the last thing they wanted to be was against civil rights. They wanna be against civil rights. So they decided what we need to do is to bring the homosexual agenda in under the cloak of civil rights. Well, that's what's happening with abortion. Abortion, it's murder. That's what it is. It's murder. But If we can cloak it as health care, what American wants to be seen as being against health care? Or if we can hide it, cloak it under, right to privacy, If we can cloak it as personal choice, if we can cloak it as a woman's right to her own body, Americans Don't wanna be against those things. And, of course, you're not against any of those things when you're opposed to abortion, unless, Again, your morality is nothing more than sentimentality. It's Christian ish. It's not rooted in eternal principles. It's not rooted in truth. It's It's not rooted really in anything beyond your own feelings, which are unreliable. If you make major decisions in your life, an interesting study was done. This is maybe about 25 years ago of Cambridge Cambridge, some of the the intellectual elites on this planet. Cambridge University students discovered that roughly a half of half of them Made major life choices based on vague inner promptings. Another term for that is their own feelings. What you feel on an issue, and your feelings can be manipulated. You know this if you watch, you know, a skillfully told story that can make you sympathetic with murder. It can make you sympathetic with adultery. It can make you sympathetic with, heinous crimes because A good storyteller knows how to manipulate your emotions and make you endorse things that are in fact evil. And that's why it's extremely important that your feelings, are not your guide, rather that you're guided by principle. And again, I I I said this in a in a Twitter thread on great movies that people could watch. One of them is called judgment at Nuremberg. Watch that film. It's about 3 hours, you know, so you have to settle aside a little bit of time. It's a an all star cast, Fencer Tracy, Maximilian Schell, even a young William Shatner appears in that. Judy Garland, Marlene Dietrich, Richard Widmark, numerous others, and the film is about the Nuremberg trials. It's about the Nuremberg trials and the brilliant defense attorney for the Nazis who complexifies the issues all the way through. He complexifies the issues brilliantly in his defense of the Nazis so that the judges themselves would be left kinda going, well, you know, I guess we understand why you killed 8,000,000 people. We understand why you burned their bodies and did grotesque experiments and sterilized people. We understand And while you loaded them all up onto train cars and sent them on one way trips to Mauthausen, Auschwitz, Dachau, Middleball, Dora, Sachsenhaus, and Ravensbruck, Buchenwald. We understand. It's a complex issue. It's hard to adjudicate on this. And I love the words of Spencer Tracy at the very end, which hit like a hammer. And I don't think this is a spoiler, but he basically says what happened here was evil, and nothing on God's green earth can ever make it right. Ladies and gentlemen, abortion is evil. Nothing on God's green earth can ever make it right. No level of clever argument should ever ever distract you from that truth. Grooming children is evil. Sexualizing children is evil. Marxism is evil. The LGBTQ alphabet mafia agenda is evil. Don't be distracted from those things. Don't buy into this idea that we need to punt on this. Rather, what we need to do is be more clear in articulating why we believe it's evil, why we believe it's wrong, and what the alternatives to this or I think the American people will respond to that. Did you know that abortion clinics remained open during the pandemic? They remained open. You couldn't go to your job. You couldn't go get groceries. You couldn't go and see Your relatives in a hospital. My wife who Was for many years a labor and deliver delivery nurse told terrible stories of, I mean, to me just awful. A woman is giving birth, but the father is not allowed to see his wife or to see the child. They're kept in complete I complete isolation by strangers for weeks without seeing their own child. Those are critical weeks. That's a critical time. Can't go see your, your grandparents in a, assisted living home. Nope. Couldn't do that. But abortion clinics, the killing of kids, those factories, they remained open. I have addressed this issue, many times. 1st well, actually, I'm not sure which which one came first here. I guess The first one was, in Fox News, I published a piece in 2019. Here's why pro abortion supporters are so fierce and bullying. Hence, it's not what you think. The pro abortion crowd, they're haters of God. That's what this is about. That's Romans 1. They're haters of God, and it's why they want to rub it in your face. They want to use your tax dollars to kill children because they know that Christians believe that human life is sacred. These are individuals who want to rub it in your face. Now we all know a little bit about that when it comes to, let's say something like sports. Your team wins and you rub it in the face of your, you know, of your your your buddies. You know, you're a red sox fan and you You beat the Yankees on that rare occasion, and, and you wanna, you know, celebrate that. But doing it on something like this, that's not a moral issue. Yankees, Red Sox, USC, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Michigan, Alabama, Auburn, 4th, and 31. Excuse me. I couldn't resist. Those aren't moral issues. This is a moral issue where somebody's trying to take it and rub it in your face. The abortion doctor comes out and says, yes. I love it. He hates that man who is videoing him. He hates what he represents because he's a hater of God. And he says you're you're killing children. He goes, I love it. I love it. That's demonic. That's why they hate it. Then I published a piece just a couple of weeks later in USA Today, abortion by the way, Neither Fox News nor USA Today would publish either one of these today. Abortion advocates hypocritically insult pro life states for bigotry and ignorance. When you write for publications, you don't get to choose the title of your articles. They They're determined by something called SEO, search engine optimization. I would never have given it a title quite so, awkward as this. But, anyway, it does capture the title of the piece. And, again, I'm saying in both of these articles that what it comes down to is that This is an area that the left has chosen to plant their flag and to die on this hill because They recognize that it is a key component of not only their political opposition, but of their, cultural opposition. They want to destroy the primary tenant of your morality, and that's cultural Marxism. And that's That's because they recognize maybe better than conservatives do that the key tenant of our worldview is A belief in God and belief that man is the object of special creation. He's not a he's not a product of random chance a necessity as the, you know, as evolutionists unbelieve. That is to say atheistic, purely naturalistic, evolutionists would argue that human beings are simply an accident in space and time. They have no purpose, and hence a human life has no more value than any other animal on the face of the earth. It's what's driving the World Economic Forum. The World Economic Forum, as I've said many times on this show and by the way, I will be at the World Economic Forum again, in just a couple of months. I was there earlier this year in Davos, Switzerland. I'll be there again. Listen. Whatever Whatever they're telling you, they're also very good at obfuscation. Whatever they say about the planet, about humanity, about food sources, about all these kinds of things. They say it in soft and gentle tones. It seems as though these are people who are do gooders. They're out looking out for the rest of us. Ladies and gentlemen, the World Economic Forum is a fascist, not Marxist. It is a fascist organization that is about depopulation. Now they they carefully Hide that agenda in a bunch of other stuff. If you go to their website and watch their videos, their their videos are all about in, You know, many of them, most of them are about loads of innocuous things like the celebration of diversity and, oh, here's a video on basket weaving in in the Andes, and here's a video on cultural you know, excuse me, environmental conservation in in the Congo, you know, all these kinds of things. But at the end of the day, they are about they're about depopulation. And in case you've forgotten this, I just want to remind you Speaker 1: of it. Speaker 0: Some of you who might be new, to this program may not be familiar with World Economic Forum agenda contributor and coauthor of limits to growth, a massively influential leftist environmentalist handbook, doctor Dennis Meadows. And listen to what doctor Dennis Meadows says. Speaker 4: So far, globally, you are so far above the population and Consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another, it's gonna come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way. I, I and I mean civil in a in a special way. Peaceful. Peace doesn't mean, that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so, that's what I hope for, That we can I mean, the planet can support Something like a 1000000000 people? Speaker 0: This is key. Speaker 4: Maybe 2,000,000,000 depending On how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably If we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart, that's unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So but if you had a smart dictatorship And the low standard of living, you can have a but but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're gonna have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, So we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share, the experience and they don't have a few rich, you know, trying to Force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know, but, that's That's what lies ahead. Speaker 0: So abortion in the United States and Coulter and many others, within the Republican party, which say we need to punt on that issue. Ladies and gentlemen, it is a global issue. It is not just an American issue, which is why I want to, wanted to show you once again. And what we'll show him we'll show him in future episodes. I I want people to become very aware of this isn't just a lunatic fringe here. This this isn't, just some guy, you know, who's you know, belongs to some weird commune, you know, living out in the middle of on Montana. This is a world economic forum. His title is agenda contributor, forming the core of their agenda. And as I say, he was coauthor of a book limits to growth, which led to the rise of the creation of the World Economic Forum in the 1st place. This is central to World Economic Forum thinking, and that is also influencing what's going on in the United States. Punt on this issue? No. Absolutely not. This is a hill I will die on, quite willingly die on this issue. I'm trying to think I I mean, I do believe in eternal principles, and I do believe that someday I have to give an answer to God. And I I don't believe that my God has called me to victory per se. He's called me to obedience. And again, there's a difference there. He's called me to adhere to, to principles. And guys like this, So I hope it can be done peacefully. I hope it can be done in a fair way that Everyone this this is the language that cracks me up cynically that everyone could participate in the experience. What is the experience? The annihilation of the world population, reducing it by a minimum of 6 Billion people according to doctor Dennis Meadows. And he really thinks it should be reduced by 7,000,000,000. We have roughly 8,000,000,000 people in the world. He thinks there should only be a 1000000000. But, hey, we can all experience a share in the experience as we reduce the global population. These are the people who are driving policy in the United States. And if we don't stand against them, what do we stand for? Did beat Dietrich Bonhoeffer say, you know, I think anti Semitism is perhaps an issue that we should punt on. You know, maybe we just don't make that big of a deal out of it. Then what's left? Then, you know, what what are you opposing Hitler for? Aggressive warfare? Well, that's what's that's what's driving a big part of his policy is to not just kill the Jews in Germany, but kill them throughout Europe. So you're not gonna impose him on that either. And, I mean, he is making the trains run on time, and he's building beautiful Ottomans. So, I mean, you know, maybe we should just all be fascist. Maybe we should all just be saying Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil, and stand there with with the what are we left with If this is if we punt on an issue like this. And ladies and gentlemen, I also want you to be aware of the fact. I come back to something I said when we're Watching that abortion doctor, this is satanic ritual. This is satanic ritual. This is I'm not sure that that guy and I do believe in demon possession. I'm reminded of what James 2/19 says. You know? You say you believe. Well, the demons believe and shutter. There's a great line in a, I never saw the film. It was with Keanu Reeves called Constantine. And someone says in the commercial, I don't believe in Satan. And the reply is, it's quite chilling. Well, he believes in you. Ladies and gentlemen, you may say you don't believe in Satan. You don't believe in demons. Well, they believe in you. And if you say I do believe there is a God, but you haven't really rooted your life in him, Well, as James 2/19 says, well, the demons believe in him and they shutter and they shutter for they know what their end actually is. And until such time, their ritual is the destruction of human life. It is the perversion. Satan isn't creative. All he can do is to pervert the things of god. He can pervert love. He can pervert beauty. He can pervert marriage. He can pervert human life. As 1 biblical commentator put it on Romans chapter 1, once you suppress the truth, You will soon, pervert the truth, and eventually, you will pervert life itself, and that's where we are is the perversion of every aspect of human life. There are haters of God, And hence, these are the kinds of individuals who celebrate the destruction of human life. We must never Give up on this issue. What we must do is be clear what we are for. We must purge, our churches, our party of individuals who are not on board with the core agenda, with who we are. We must have a mission statement, and then we must be prepared to articulate it with clarity and to fight for it in the public arena, educating the American people on this issue and everything else. We are allowing the cultural left to define, to redefine terms, to redefine the use of language, to redefine the issues as though they themselves occupied by default the Burrell high ground, which they most certainly do not, but they've been very effective with the steady drip of aligned media of intimidating, Americans, intimidating conservatives from really adhering to their principles and to fighting on these issues. And so we must expose it. We must expose the truth for what it is. We must be a people who stand for something. And I end with this, a nation That destroys its children, that makes war on its children as we certainly are, has no regard for its future. But I'll go further than that. A nation that does such things invites the wrath of Speaker 2: God.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Breaking News: The #NewZealand government are desperate to stop this information getting out. They have failed. Massive numbers dying in New Zealand as a result of the mandated vaccinations that were forced on the people by World Economic Forum Cultist #JacindaArdern when she…

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the mortality rates of vaccinated individuals. They analyze the data and find that one batch of Pfizer vaccines had a 21% death rate. They also identify the top 10 vaccinators with the highest mortality ratios. One vaccinator had a 25% death rate, while another had a 17% death rate. The speakers express concern over these numbers and question what could be causing such high mortality rates. They emphasize that this should never happen and suggest that the vaccines may be the cause. The video concludes with a mention of the importance of protecting vulnerable individuals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So people can find that? Yep. Find my badge? Speaker 1: Yes. They should be able to. Yes. Hello? So what I did was our internal batch ID. I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 0: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 1: And so we then look at the percentage ratio. Speaker 0: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 1: Yes, they are. Speaker 0: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% death mortality Speaker 1: rate Speaker 0: from that batch. They are high. Now Speaker 1: There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was other vaccinators themselves. What are they doing? Are we looking at some who have got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators you have the highest ratios of mortality. Speaker 0: For privacy reasons, we have redacted The names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. We have to. We have. Speaker 1: Yeah. So Speaker 0: we've just called it vaccinator 1. Speaker 1: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one has vaccinated 246 people, and 60 of them are now no longer with us. Speaker 0: That is nearly 25%. Speaker 1: 1 in 4. Nearly 1 in 4 That that person vaccinated is right there. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, but this this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, will be 0.75. Speaker 0: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. So it looks then we start to say what is it they were putting into people's bodies Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 By vaccinated, the 3rd highest vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 1: Yeah. And unless they they go around terminally ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, then there is no other explanation for this death. And why would they be doing that anyway? You know, it doesn't make any sense. The box here is meant to protect those people.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Barry Young: The Whistle-blower Who Stood Up for Transparency and Public Health Barry Young, a former employee of Te Whatu Ora, took a courageous stand. Disheartened by what he perceives as critical flaws in the national vaccination program, Young decided to act. He accessed…

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

#JacindaArdern former Prime Minister of #NewZealand pushed the vax like a cheap city block drug pusher while telling everyone that the Government was the only true source of information. However evidence has emerged that she and her Government decided they were exempt from…

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Is the World Economic Forum a Cult. The command and control of members of the World Economic Forum by sole Chairman #Klaus Schwab is increasingly being likened to that of a #Cult leader. Unelected Schwab has groomed young people and assisted by other powerful fellow cult…

ichudov
Posted - December 6, 2023 at 5:12 AM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 1:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my analysis of "NZ whistleblower data," I aimed to eliminate any influence from Covid in NZ, which emerged in Feb 2022. I focused on individuals who received a second shot by Sep 4, 2021, and died before Feb 2022. To ensure equal exposure, I considered deaths within 180 days of vaccination, prior to the Covid outbreak. The resulting chart, although unremarkable, is intriguing due to its lack of significant patterns. I'm seeking insights to uncover any overlooked details.

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

I tried to reproduce some analyses of "NZ whistleblower data". I tried to remove any confounding by Covid in NZ (which started in Feb 2022). This thread will detail my efforts - and I want to be corrected.👇🧵

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

I selected all people who received a SECOND SHOT (regardless of whether they have a record of first or third, etc shots) by Sep 4, 2021, and subsequently died. I looked at all deaths that happened before Feb of 2022.

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

To ensure that every vaccinated person had the same exposure, I only considered deaths within 180 days of vaccination. This way, every vaxed person in the sample had a chance to be exposed for full 180 days, and this ended BEFORE the Covid pandemic started in NZ. My query: https://t.co/BcwPjpsbz8

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

The resulting chart does not look particularly noteworthy, and THAT is what makes it noteworthy! Chart repeated again https://t.co/DRTyTn1mlk

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

There is a couple of little peaks in week 8 and 12, but frankly I do not see a big bad pattern here. Please help me see what I am missing!

JimFergusonUK
Posted - December 6, 2023 at 1:09 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 6:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Korean studies reveal alarming health outcomes post COVID-19 vaccination, exposing concerning trends in vaccinated individuals. Serious conditions, from blood disorders to musculoskeletal issues, have been identified. This data challenges the narrative of vaccine safety and urges a reevaluation of pandemic health measures. Excess deaths linked to coercive health mandates highlight the dangers of unchecked globalism in public health policy. It's crucial to protect individual health rights amidst global health governance.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Breaking News: Korean Studies Reveal Startling Health Outcomes Post COVID-19 Vaccination Korean Studies Indicate What Our Governments are Hiding. In a groundbreaking revelation that's sending shockwaves through the global health community, Dr. Guy Hatchard sheds light on alarming findings from Korean studies about COVID-19 vaccinations. These studies, emerging from the heart of Seoul, uncover disturbing trends in health outcomes for vaccinated individuals, drawing a stark contrast with their unvaccinated counterparts. Why did former New Zealand PM and World Economic Forum cultist Jacinda Ardern exempt herself and 11,000 others from vaccination? https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709827142148628638?s=20 Spanning a spectrum of serious health concerns, from blood disorders to debilitating musculoskeletal conditions, the research paints a harrowing picture of the potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Korean Government Data: "I don’t really need to explain much about these results do I? They speak for themselves. These studies analysed the rates of some specific health outcomes for millions of people following Covid vaccination. The researchers concluded that a very wide range of concerning health conditions are initiated over extended periods as a result of Covid vaccination." Dr Guy Hatchard This eye-opening data compels us to question the safety and long-term effects of these vaccines, challenging the narrative of their harmlessness and urging a reevaluation of our approach to pandemic health measures. In light of news emerging from a whistle blower in New Zealand linking Covid Vaccines to massive amounts of Excess Deaths will Jacinda Ardern face possible investigation and prosecution? https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731788594782548440?s=20 In the shadow of a global health crisis, the startling surge in excess deaths linked to coercive health mandates casts a glaring spotlight on the dangers of unchecked globalism in public health policy. These revelations, laden with grief and outcry, serve as a stark wake-up call, challenging the monolithic approach of global health directives. They underscore the dire consequences of sacrificing individual health sovereignty at the altar of a one-size-fits-all global agenda. As we stand at this critical juncture, it is paramount to fiercely advocate for a world where individual health rights and freedoms are not just protected but revered, amidst the sweeping tides of global health governance. #WHO #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #DepopulationAgenda #Myocarditus #Pfizer #Moderna #NewZealand #DrGuyHatchard #ExcessDeaths #DiedSuddenly #SuddenDeaths #TurboCancer #mRNA #Korea #Health https://hatchardreport.com/korean-studies-indicate-what-our-government-is-hiding/

Korean Studies Indicate What Our Government is Hiding - Hatchard Report This article is also available as a PDF document that you can print, download, and share. An audio version is available here. hatchardreport.com

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

#JacindaArdern former Prime Minister of #NewZealand pushed the vax like a cheap city block drug pusher while telling everyone that the Government was the only true source of information. However evidence has emerged that she and her Government decided they were exempt from…

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Urgent Call for Accountability: Could Jacinda Ardern be Sought for potential Misconduct in Medical Mandate Crisis? As evidence emerges of a potentially explosive leak of highly classified vaccine information that appears to suggest an appalling and significant increase in excess…

JimFergusonUK
Posted - December 6, 2023 at 1:49 PM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 6:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Amidst controversy, there's turmoil within the World Economic Forum and New Zealand's government. Panic ensues as they try to restrict public access to information. Allegedly, COVID-19 vaccines are linked to a surge in illness and fatalities in New Zealand. Rumors suggest a directive to erase this data, potentially involving former PM Jacinda Ardern. Demands grow to release the data now.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Did Jacinda Ardern just order the Data to be deleted? Amidst a growing storm of controversy, there's escalating turmoil within the World Economic Forum and New Zealand's government circles. Panic appears to have set in as they desperately attempt to shut down any public access to the information. This unrest is fueled by a purported leak of sensitive information, allegedly connecting COVID-19 vaccines to a significant upsurge in illness and fatalities in New Zealand. Amidst this chaos, swirling rumors suggest a drastic move: a directive to erase this contentious data. https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1732072545447301367?s=20 While unverified whispers implicate former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in potentially ordering this data purge, concrete evidence remains elusive. As the situation unfolds, there are increasing demands to: "Release the Data now!" If she and her former administration have nothing to hide then release the data now. #JacindaArdern #NewZealand #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #DepopulationAgenda #CoverUp #Whistleblower #BarryYoung #DiedSuddenly #ExcessDeaths #mRNA #CovidVaccinations #Myocarditus #ReleasetheDatanow

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Are the elitists really looking to reduce the Global population by 6 Billion people? Beyond Boundaries: The Perilous Intersection of Global Elitism and Population Control. The rising concerns about the ideology of depopulation are increasingly linked to the World Economic…

liz_churchill10
Posted - December 6, 2023 at 3:02 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 7:12 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

If the New Zealand data wasn’t true…they wouldn’t be jailing the person presenting anonymized data. They’d release all of the data to prove he’s wrong instead of deleting it to justify jailing him for 7 years. Data shows 20% of NZ’s vaccinated have died. Biological War Crimes. https://t.co/re7aCbYWiZ

stkirsch
Posted - December 10, 2023 at 4:25 AM
Saved - December 10, 2023 at 10:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nobody showed up today to prove the vaccine's safety based on the NZ data breach. If it's truly safe, why aren't countries sharing public health record-level data? #VaccineSafety #DataTransparency

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Nobody came to my space today to show how the vaccine was safe and effective based on the New Zealand data breach. If the vaccine was so safe, HNZ wouldn’t be all upset about the cat being let out of the bag. If the vaccine is so safe, why isn’t ANY country disclosing the public health record-level data?

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Here’s the space

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

https://t.co/rutR6PhbvD

DiedSuddenly_
Posted - December 12, 2023 at 2:49 AM
Saved - December 12, 2023 at 2:10 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

Steve Kirsch makes it public record and notifies NZ Health with their own data, which shows that they are killing their own people. Plausible deniability is no longer an option. https://t.co/IqXhQzIkiS

COUNTERSPIN111
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 9:28 AM
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 9:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Ministry of Health sent a memo to address the whistleblower's data release. They are concerned about personal data being traceable by experts. The ministry maintains that the vaccine is safe and effective and has not caused excess mortality. Opinions on this matter are welcome.

@COUNTERSPIN111 - COUNTERSPIN MEDIA NZ

MINISTRY OF HEALTH MEMO ABOUT WHISTLEBLOWER SENT TO CSM Today we were sent the memo that was sent to Ministry of Health workers following Barry Young's data release. The ministry has been in damage control ever since the damning evidence about the Covid-19 injection harm came to light. The focus is directed at personal data in the public domain being traceable by someone with expertise. They reiterate that the vaccine is safe and effective and has not contributed to excess mortality. What do you all make of this? @_FreeNZ @stkirsch @RealAlexJones @TuckerCarlson @KiwiLithium @c_plushie @nzdsos @reallyohsure @MrsBerserker @HopeRising19 @UnitedFreePres @james_freeman__ @NZLoyal @dailyexaminernz

Kevin_McKernan
Posted - March 18, 2024 at 11:56 AM
Saved - March 19, 2024 at 2:11 AM

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

“This data absolutely does not show higher mortality in the Vaccinated but we can’t share that data” Submit OIA for data. “We do not have any such data that can make claims regarding vax status and mortality” These are the folks that illegally took down my entire 820gb drive.

@dystopian_DU - Rebekah Barnett

NZ Health says it can't provide Covid mortality data by vax status because, "The mortality data held by Te Whatu Ora does not include COVID-19 vaccination status." All time biggest experiment & they didn't bother to track deaths by vax status. Lying? Or incompetent?

stkirsch
Posted - July 1, 2024 at 2:42 AM
Saved - July 2, 2024 at 8:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The COVID vaccine's safety is questioned due to the lack of transparent data from almost every country. I have obtained vaccine and death records from a large country and will soon provide answers. Some batches were significantly more deadly, but authorities claim it is safe. The privacy excuses for withholding data seem to be a way to prevent analysis. I will publish the data on my S3 server for others to replicate the analysis.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

If the COVID vaccine is so darn safe, why does EVERY SINGLE COUNTRY (except one) hide the record level data??? Yup, I LEGALLY got all the vaccine and death records in a big country and it's now being run through the http://buckets.py program. Answers real soon. And some batches were >100X as deadly as other batches, but don't worry... the authorities assure us it's safe.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

They didn't even need to obfuscate any of the dates of vaccination or death!!! So the privacy excuses people give for not releasing the public health data are simply to keep the data from getting into the hands of people who know how to analyze it. I'll publish all the data on my S3 server shortly so anyone can replicate the analysis.

HopeRising19
Posted - August 22, 2024 at 8:16 PM
Saved - August 22, 2024 at 9:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that a recent court ruling forced the release of Pfizer's Post Marketing Surveillance report, which they wanted to keep confidential for 75 years. In the first 90 days of the COVID vaccine's use, there were 1,223 reported deaths. This data was also held by NZ Medsafe, which I confirmed through an Official Information Act request. Meanwhile, the media and government continued to promote the vaccine as safe and effective.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

HOW MANY DEATHS WERE REPORTED TO PFIZER IN FIRST 90 DAYS OF COVID VAX USE? It's called a Post Marketing Surveillance report and YOU were never supposed to see it. A USA judge ordered the release of this document.... despite the wishes of Pfizer and the CDC, who petitioned to keep the Pfizer documents confidential for SEVENTY FIVE YEARS. In the first 90 days of product use, Pfizer received 1223 REPORTS OF DEATH NZ Medsafe held this data too. We know because we asked in an OIA. The media and the government just trundled on telling you SAFE AND EFFECTIVE (link in comments) #nzcovidinquiry2

sonia_elijah
Posted - November 2, 2024 at 10:18 AM
Saved - November 3, 2024 at 1:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Dutch government intentionally deleted 878,000 Covid vaccination records from the CIMS database between January 2021 and January 2024, following political pressure. This systematic removal affected records of those who died or emigrated. I'm eager to interview @waukema again about this alarming issue.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

🚨The Dutch government deliberately deleted 878,000 Covid vaccination records from the CIMS database between January 2021 and January 2024, a process designed in early 2022 in response to political pressure. This removal was systematic and intentional, affecting records of individuals who died or emigrated. 🚨 Brilliant work done by @waukema to uncover this damning finding. I'm looking forward to interviewing him again on this very alarming issue.

@waukema - Wouter Aukema

x.com/i/article/1831…

wolsned
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 2:31 PM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 12:39 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

The New Zealand vaccine database whistle-blower on vaccine deaths, injuries, payments, and political exemptions, talks to Liz Gunn. 'people were dying as soon as the were vaccinated' This is MASSIVE. Please repost. https://t.co/QJgY6dEycI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system in New Zealand. They noticed discrepancies in the data, specifically a high number of deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They provide charts showing the top ten batches with high mortality rates and mention a website called "Find My Batch" where people can find information about their specific batch. The speaker also highlights the high mortality rates among certain vaccinators. They question the reasons behind these deaths and express concern about the vaccine's effectiveness. They mention spikes in deaths during flu seasons and the COVID-19 pandemic, but note that the death rate in New Zealand has continued to increase even after COVID-19.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I was involved with building a project, helped with, implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called, a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get They get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it. I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates, of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. Speaker 1: So what did you notice when you first started to look At this data as you were building it? Speaker 0: Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that, people would die almost straight away after being injected. So That sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I I love science. It's My all time favorite. I've got a I've got a master's degree in science. Oh, no but no one knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one. Speaker 1: A lot of people want to know what was my batch? What can you do to help keep us with that? Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top Ten, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate. And I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but You can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn't be too difficult. Speaker 1: Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that's only the top Tien, I want to know my batch. What would you advise? Speaker 0: Yep. You can do that. There's, there's a website, find my batch for the whole world that can actually find that. And I we can list this on, a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches Just so far, New Zealand, a 119 Speaker 1: Of the Pfizer? Speaker 0: Of the Pfizer. Actually, not of all of them because we have We have Moderna. We have AstraZeneca. We've but they're only few and far between. Mostly, it's Pfizer. Mostly, it's Pfizer in New Zealand. Speaker 1: So people can find that? Yep. Find my batch? Speaker 0: Yes. They should be able to. Speaker 1: Yes. Hello? Speaker 0: So what I did was our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: death There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was, are the vaccinators themselves, what are they doing? Are we looking at some who I've got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators Who have the highest ratios of mortality? Speaker 1: For privacy reasons, We have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. Speaker 0: We have to. Speaker 1: We have. Yeah. So we've just called it Vaccinator 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one This vaccine added 246 people, and 60 of them are no longer with us. Speaker 1: That is nearly 25%. One in 4. Speaker 0: Nearly 1 in 4 that that person's vaccinated is dying dead. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, But this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, But we point 7. Speaker 1: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. Yeah. So it looks then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people's bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 by vaccinated, the 3rd highest Vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 0: Yes. And unless they they go around, terribly ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, Then there is no other explanation for this then, and why would they give them that anyway? You know? It doesn't make any sense. The vaccine is meant to Protect those people. On the left there, the big red line, is the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's A lot of people died on that day. From there, the next line where you get more than a 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got 1. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster, that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. Then The next red one, the Christchurch massacre, which was in 2019 in March. But from that, you get a a cluster in 2020, a whole bunch there. May have been another bad flu season. We don't know. But then from 2021, you see A black line there appearing, and then it's like a flick of a switch. Suddenly, the black lines get closer together, And there's more of them. Very thick black lines there. So this this one here, Peak deaths was COVID with or from COVID, but then the deaths from COVID, if you look at the Worldometer website, it correlates to that. That was the same time, and they said that over 60 people died with or from COVID. Then after that, it suddenly suddenly drops off. So after that, you only get a couple of people a day dying with or from COVID. So if you if you go back to The chart there, in that case, you would you would expect to see the black lines disappear because no one's dying from COVID anymore. Right? But you're not. Yeah. Absolutely not. You're seeing the black lines. There are more people dying than ever before. These are the biggest number of deaths we've seen in history of New Zealand. The death rate has gone up 6%, 8% year on year. Even after COVID wasn't a thing. The death rate is still going up. And that's illustrated here by these black lines which are still going on.
View Full Interactive Feed