TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here is Sen. Majority Whip Sonny Borrelli who examined just only 5% sample ballots cast in the Maricopa County 2020 Insurrection, 1,298 dead voters, 17,822 mismatched ballots, and thousands of other statutory crimes, Here are the dead voting even before ballots were mailed out. https://t.co/UgytHA7sdE
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 2020 election, we analyzed 30 voters out of a total of 1283. We found examples of voters who had passed away but still cast a ballot. For privacy reasons, we have redacted the obituaries. These cases were confirmed by the Secretary of State and public records. One voter died on September 29, 2020, but their ballot was cast on October 10, 2020, before it was mailed. Another voter who passed away on September 27, 2020, had their ballot envelope dated September 16, 2020. Ballots were not mailed until October 7. There were other instances of voters who had passed away but still voted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the 2020 election, that number of voters was 1283, and we have analyzed 30. Here are some of the examples of the voters we found. For the privacy of the families, We have redacted the obituaries that each of these were confirmed by the Secretary of State, other public records, and all contained public obituaries matching the dates of birth, the address, the city of origin, the sex, and the location and state of residence. This particular voter died on 9 29, 2020 and cast a ballot On October 10, 2020, dying prior to the ballot being mailed, This particular voter was canceled deceased, died on 9/27 of 2020, And as you can see the ballot envelope is dated 9/16/2020. Ballots were not mailed by the State of Arizona until October 7th.
This voter on ninetwenty seventwenty twenty passed away a U. S. Navy man who ended up having A ballot casting his name on October 9, 2020. This voter passed away on 9 10 of 2019 voted in more than 1 election and had moved to Illinois where they passed away with their loved ones prior to this election casting a vote on October 12, 2020. This voter Also, on 9/29/2020, had a funeral service at Veterans Memorial and then voted on October 6th.
And remember, ballots are not issued in the mail until October 7.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here’s Pennsylvania hearing on the Nov 3, 2020 Insurrection, A: People that had not voted since the 1990’s were all now reactivated to receive mail in ballots, B: More than 1500 votes where the mail in ballots were received in the election office before it was even mailed. https://t.co/Eci6e70BOF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Gloria Lee Snover, Chairman of the Northampton County Republican Committee, discusses the complexity of the recent election due to the new mail-in ballot system and changing rules. She mentions the presence of unmanned drop boxes in the general election that were not present in the primary, as well as a pattern of reactivated old voter rolls in the SURE system. Snover expresses concern about people who hadn't voted in decades suddenly receiving mail-in ballots, potentially enabling undetected fraud. Additionally, she highlights over 1500 votes in Northampton County where the mail-in ballot was received before being mailed. Snover concludes by urging a remedy for the issues with the mail-in voting process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Gloria Lee Snover. I am Chairman of the Northampton County Republican Committee. Northampton County is a Democrat county where Republicans win elections. I have been involved in the political process in Northampton County For more than 25 years, I've worked on campaigns for township supervisor to President of the United States. This year was one of the most vast complex elections I have ever had to oversee as Party County Chairman.
The complexity was due to the new mail in ballot system and ever changing rules. The unmanned drop boxes in the general election that we did not have in the primary All counted another one, very strange. There is a pattern A reactivated old voter roll that kept reoccurring on the SURE system. The SURE system is our Pennsylvania voter system. Scores of people that had not voted since 1990s, more than 22 years ago, We're all now reactivated and receiving mail in ballots.
People that didn't vote for Obama or Hillary were all of a sudden receiving mail in ballots, setting up the opportunity for fraud on a massive Dale, that would go undetected because voters who never intended to vote would not know. The SURE system is not so sure. We also found in Northampton County more than 1500 votes where the mail in ballot was received in the election office on a date before it was even mailed. We have a problem with this election. Thank you for allowing me to share my election experience and I plead with you to remedy the mail in Valid process.
Thank you.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, the Insurrection of 2020 executed and certified by Katie Hobbs Over 25,000 ballots used in the Arizona Nov 3, 2020 Insurrection CONFIRMED FRAUDULENT. Meaning 25,000 ballots are invalid, illegal, criminal as Katie Hobbs and fraudulent as Robert L. Peters himself. https://t.co/i4B9Usk7iV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the PDF used for the election process in Maricopa County. The election provider customizes the ballots based on geographical areas to ensure voters are selecting the appropriate candidates. There are over 5,000 different permutations and combinations of these ballots, which are also available in Spanish. The reason for creating these ballots in advance is to accommodate third-party mail-in ballots and early voting options. However, the quality of the printed ballots in this group is significantly lower than what would be expected from a PDF. They appear to be degraded compared to on-demand or third-party printed ballots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other finding here was that we had approximately 25,000 ballots that were not created from the PDF that is used for the election process. So in other words, the election provider comes up with ballots and it's specific to of geographical area because the person that lives in this neighborhood might not be voting for the same people that live in that neighborhood or another neighborhood. So here in Maricopa County from memory, you had 5,012 or something like that, just over 5,000 different permutations and combinations to the ballots. Then that's multiplied by 2 because there's a Spanish version that's available for each one of these ballots, but it's the same ballot with the same people just in a different language. So we've got 5, we'll just say 5,000 different ballots for now that are created ahead of time and those are created in PDF.
Now the big reason why is you have of third party send out mail in ballots, so those have to be created in advance. And second, for your early voting, you have vote on demand. So in other words, even if I live way out in the corner of the county, but I work downtown, I could go to something downtown that could print my ballot from my area and I could vote here. It's convenient, a lot of people do that. These PDFs are created in advance.
They're obviously good quality PDFs and when they're printed, they should look roughly or exactly the same. In this group of ballots, I find that the quality is severely degraded from what a PDF would be as if printed on demand or if printed by your, third party provider who prints these all the time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In June of 2021, we informed them about our suspicion of over 25,000 counterfeit ballots. However, the GOP and conservative operatives spread propaganda to undermine our credibility. Despite having ample time to prevent a repeat in 2022, they chose to do nothing. As a result, they enabled the same fraudulent activity to occur again in 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fact. Now early on, I want you to know, in July of 21 actually, before that, we, we told them in June. We told them that we suspected from what we're seeing 25,000 plus counterfeit inauthentic ballots. That was early on in the process. Again, because of propaganda by the GOP's attorney, the GOP, other conservative operatives, they planted the seed inside this that you can't trust that.
No. That's not it, etcetera. You'll hear more about it. But every one of the people up there knew this in advance even of this hearing today. Now the reason I bring that up is they had well over a year and a half to react to this so it wouldn't be duplicated in 2022, but they didn't.
They did nothing, and they allowed it. They enabled this to be done again in 2020
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is the Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs to Maricopa County, this is how many ballots I need from you. 30% of duplicates came in between Nov. 4 - Nov. 9th of 2020, https://t.co/GLwgsgZ4VH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Further analysis of the duplicates and the EVVs revealed an interesting trend. The graph shows the duplicates in relation to the daily percentage of EVVs. There was a sudden significant increase in the percentage of duplicates on certain days, with 96% of the ballots being duplicates on two of those days. The area under the curve represents around 25-30% of the duplicates, which were received between November 4th and November 9th. This led us to remove the blanks and scribbles from the plot, and the same phenomenon was observed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As we did further analysis on the blanks I mean, sorry, the duplicates and the EDVRE. And this is what's interesting. So what we're plotting here is the duplicates as a function of the daily percentage of EVVs. So here's the signal. But what you see is you see suddenly this what you may call a significant growth in percentage.
In fact, in Several of these days, there's 96% of the ballots that came in on 2 of these days are, are duplicates. So there was a serious number of duplicates. In fact, the area under this curve is close to 30%, 25 to 30% of the duplicates came in between, November 4th to to November 9th. And that motivated us to also on the same plot Drop the blanks and the scribbles, and you see the same phenomenon there.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is the Arizona audit of the Nov 3, 2020 Insurrection 74, 243 ballots returned and counted in the 2020 Insurrection with NO RECORD of ever being Sent Out. Note: Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, https://t.co/QRuAgseJNy
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona without a clear record of being sent. In Arizona, there are supposed to be records (EB32s and EB33s) of when a mail-in ballot is sent and received. The number of EB32s should be higher than the number of EB33s. However, in this case, there are more ballots received than there are records of being sent. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but it is unclear if they were actually sent to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 7,000 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's there's, EB 32s and EB 33s. EB32 is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent, and an EB33 is supposed to give a record of when, the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EB32s more sent out than there are that are received. Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to.
And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is A: CONFIRMED B: RECONFIRMED C: BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT Over 25,000 COUNTERFEIT ballots were inserted into the Arizona 2020 Insurrection Meaning 25,000 ballots are invalid, illegal, criminal as Katie Hobbs and counterfeit as Robert L. Peters himself. Trump won. https://t.co/pvNdKTuqXt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the PDF used for the election process. The election provider creates specific ballots for different geographical areas. In Maricopa County, there were over 5,000 different permutations and combinations of the ballots, with a Spanish version available for each. These ballots are created in advance as some are sent out by third parties and for early voting. However, the quality of the ballots in this group is significantly worse than the PDFs that are printed on demand or by the regular provider.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other finding here was that we had approximately 25,000 ballots that were not created from the PDF that is used for the election process. So in other words, the election provider comes up with ballots and it's specific to a geographical area because the person that lives in this neighborhood might not be voting for the same people that live in that neighborhood or another neighborhood. So here in Maricopa County from memory, you had 5,012 or something like that, just over 5,000 different permutations and combinations to the ballots, then that's multiplied by 2 because there's a Spanish version that's available for each one of these ballots, but it's the same ballot with the same people just in a different language. So we've got 5, we'll just say 5,000 different ballots for now that are created ahead of time and those are created in PDF. Now the big reason why is you have of third party send out mail in ballots, so those have to be created in advance.
And second, for your early voting, you have vote on demand. So in other words, even if I live way out in the corner of the county, but I work downtown, I could go to something downtown that could print my ballot from my area and I could vote here. It's convenient, a lot of people do that. These PDFs are created in advance. They're obviously good quality PDFs and when they're printed, they should look roughly or exactly the same.
In this group of ballots, I find that the quality is severely degraded from what a PDF would be as if printed on demand or if printed by your, third party provider who prints these all the time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Eric Spikin, a forensic chemist and document analyst with extensive experience in examining questioned documents. I have worked on over 2,000 cases across 5 continents and my expertise has been recognized by various media outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, America's Most Wanted, Forensic Files, and Good Morning America. Recently, I was asked to investigate election-related matters in Arizona, focusing on printing processes, machine copied marks, and the CPS code for counterfeit protection. I traveled to Arizona with three colleagues from my office to conduct the examination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And performed examinations in over 2,000 cases in 5 continents. His expert testimonials have been featured in the Wall Street Journal, America's Most Wanted, Forensic Files, and Good Morning America to name a few.
Speaker 1: I'm Eric Spikin, and I'm a forensic chemist And a forensic document analyst. That means I deal with all aspects of questioned documents, when they were made, if they've been altered, changed, or added to, and how long ink has been on paper. I was asked If I had experience in election matters to look at primarily printing processes, machine copied marks, CPS code, which is a counterfeit protection system. And I said that I did, and I traveled to Arizona with 3 other people from my office.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In June of 2021, we informed them about our suspicion of over 25,000 counterfeit ballots. The GOP and conservative operatives spread propaganda to undermine our credibility. Despite having ample time to prevent a repeat in 2022, they chose to do nothing. As a result, the same fraudulent activities occurred again in 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fact. Now early on, I want you to know, in July of 21, actually, before that, we, we told them in June. We told them that we suspected from what we're seeing 25,000 plus counterfeit inauthentic ballots. That was early on in the process. Again, because of propaganda by the GOP's attorney, the GOP, other conservative operatives, they planted the seed inside this that you can't trust that.
No. That's not it, etcetera. You'll hear more about it. But every one of the people up there knew this in advance even of this hearing today. Now the reason I bring that up is they had well over a year and a half to react to this, so it wouldn't be duplicated in 2022, but they didn't.
They did nothing, and they allowed it. They enabled this to be done again in 2020
Video Transcript AI Summary
In my examination of the photographs, I found that there were approximately 5,000 different ballots produced by the election subcontractor for each zone or district in Maricopa County. These ballots were specific to the issues relevant to each area. However, I discovered that around 25,000 ballots were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and breaks in the circles or ovals, which were consistent across all of them. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent more than double the margin of Joe Biden's 10,457 vote lead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There were 2 primary findings, that I had. Number 1 is that there were a series of ballots, that I examined the photographs of, And the minion as the election subcontractor produced ballots for each of the zones or districts that were involved at least in the area that I looked at here in Maricopa County, and there were 5,000 approximately a little over different ballots. As you know in the state there could be 2 different senator races that could be 10 different house races in all the permutations and combinations is what gives you the 5,000. So they create a final ballot for each one of these districts or zones or regions so that when you go in and you give your name and it knows you're from this area, you would get this ballot to vote on all the issues that pertain to you and only the issues that pertain to you. And I found that there were about 25,000 ballots that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot.
In other words, the printing process, appearance, is completely different than than what you would get from a 1st generation PDF printing. As you can imagine, the lines are perfect, So they're perfectly straight, no breaks in the circles or ovals as they may be, and they're a solid line. When I examined some of the early voting ballots and election day ballots from various polling locations. There were about 25,000 did not have printing from this perfect PDF as you would expect, but instead had breaks in all the same places around an oval, so you can look at one of the ovals and there are imperfections in the line, and they're in the same place on every single one of these ballots. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent over double the amount of Joe Biden's 10,457 vote margin
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is Nov 3, 2020 the most secure Insurrection in US history, 42,000 voted more than once 1,500 dead people 19,000 non residents 8,000 from non existent addresses 15,000 commercial or vacant addresses, 4000 non citizens “Our evidence has never been refuted only ignored.” https://t.co/gDpTV3TzdZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Due to AB 4, mail-in ballots surged from 70,000 in 2016 to over 690,000 this year. Despite facing accusations of fraud, our team diligently investigated every lead. Our experts discovered that over 42,000 individuals voted multiple times by comparing voter lists and identifying matches in names, addresses, and dates of birth. Additionally, approximately 1,500 deceased individuals were recorded as voting by cross-referencing male voters with social security death records. Moreover, over 19,000 people voted despite not residing in Nevada, excluding military and student voters. Our analysis also revealed around 8,000 votes from non-existent addresses and over 15,000 votes from commercial or vacant addresses. Astonishingly, nearly 4,000 non-citizens voted, as confirmed by comparing DMV records with the list of actual voters in the 2020 election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because of AB 4, the number of mail ballots rocketed from about 70,000 in 2016 to over 690,000 this year. The election was inevitably riddled with fraud and our hotline never stopped ringing. While the media and democrats accused us of making it all up, Our team began chasing down every lead. Our evidence came both from data scientists and from brave whistle blowers. Here's what we found, over 42,000, 42,000 people voted more than once.
Our experts were able to make this determination by reviewing the list of actual voters, and comparing it to other voters with the same name, Address and date of birth. This method was also able to catch people using different variations of their first name, such as William and Bell, and individuals who are registered both under a married name and a maiden name. At least 1500 dead people are recorded as voting, as shown by comparing the list of male voters with the social security death records. More than 19 15,000 people voted even though they didn't live in Nevada. This does not include military voters or students.
These voters were identified by comparing the list of voters with the US postal service's national change of address database, among other sources. About 8,000 people voted from non existent addresses. Here we cross referenced voters With the coding accuracy support system, which allowed our experts to identify undeliverable addresses. Over 15,000 votes were cast from commercial or vacant addresses. Our experts found these voters by analyzing official US Postal Service records that flag non residential addresses and addresses vacant for more than 90 days.
Incredibly, almost 4,000 non citizens also voted, as determined by comparing official DMV records of non citizens to the list of actual True voters in the 2020 election.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here’s what the audit of the Arizona 2020 Insurrection reveals, A: main stream media go to hell B: ‘recount’ is an insurrection of the Insurrection C: over 20,000 ballots went to people’s addresses that didn’t live there anymore D: so the question is who cast those ballots? https://t.co/YJlb9T8d77
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the Arizona audit report and criticizes the media for misrepresenting the findings. They argue that the audit revealed tens of thousands of fraudulent ballots, including 57,000 questionable ones and 23,000 that were cast by people who no longer lived at the addresses. They mention an analysis by Dr. Shiva, who found 17,000 duplicate ballots, with a significant number arriving after November 3rd. The speaker asserts that the election should not have been certified and calls for further investigation. They accuse the media of lying about the findings and emphasize the need for certification based on the evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the report that came out back from Arizona and the audit that we saw there. What are some of your key takeaways from it?
Speaker 1: Well, the media, the mainstream media are lying about the findings. They're inflating the difference between an audit and a recount. Yeah. If you count the same fraudulent balance balance over and over. You're going to get the same fraudulent result.
What they're not looking at is the fact that there's tens of thousands of fraudulent ballots in those total counts. So the auditors found alone 57,000 and set are questionable. Meaning that over 20,000 that were mailed in ballots that they went to people's addresses is that they didn't live there anymore. So the question is who actually cast that ballot if they didn't live there? And that's 23,000.
That's more than double This so called Biden margin in Arizona. This is a state only decided by 10,457 ballots. We also just heard from Doctor. Shiva who did an analysis of the mail in ballot envelopes. This is not even included in the forensic audit report.
He found 17,000 duplicate ballots and guess when they all came in from 25% came in after November 3rd and the dates between November 4th and November 9th, there was a surge in duplicate ballots. On 2 of those days, all the mail in envelopes that came in 96% were duplicates. What does that tell you? This election should have never been certified. It should have never been called on election night.
The media is lying about the findings here. There's certainly more than enough to be certified and that's what needs to happen.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is the Arizona Senate forensic audit of the 2020 Insurrection confirming the crime and the coverup, The Maricopa County operative Brian Ramirez deleted the election database for the Nov 3, 2020 Insurrection just a day before the equipment was turned over to auditors. https://t.co/F0WU2MjCUq
Video Transcript AI Summary
At some point, there is a correlation between the purging of the database and the date of the audit. They both happen almost at the same time, the day before the audit. This connection requires an explanation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Things of that nature. But the importance of this is is that at some point in time, at that date, there's also a correlation, to the purging of the database. It's the day before the audit. Okay? On the same time.
Exactly. Almost the same time. Exactly. Okay. Obviously, this requires an explanation.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And the Arizona Senate Audit, Katie Hobbs sent 23,344 mail in ballots to voters who voted in the Arizona Nov 3, 2020 General Insurrection even though they moved. So who voted? https://t.co/8aQTmbBLYa
Video Transcript AI Summary
We compared the voter rolls to identify people who had moved but still voted by mail. We excluded cases where someone with the same last name still lived at the address. This led us to find 23,344 individuals who voted from addresses they no longer resided at. Mail-in ballots cannot be forwarded, so the only legal way for this to happen is if the voter knows the current resident and arranges to pick up their ballot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we went and took the voter rolls, and we compared them against this to see how many people might have moved, and based on statute 44 44 voters who voted via mail in ballots even though they showed in Melissa as having moved from that address. We accounted for the circumstances where a college student might have moved away from home or a family member might have moved somewhere else. So we actually eliminated all the all the cases where someone was still at that residence that had the same last name. That's how we came up with 23,344. So if your mail in ballot is sent to an address that you no longer live at, there should be no way for that for you to receive that mail in ballot, at least they're, you know, it's generally nice a way for you to reset mail ballot because mail in ballots are legally not allowed to be forwarded, so it can't be forwarded to your new address.
So the only way this situation could happen legally e is if you know the prior you know, if you know the current resident and you're able to meet with them and pick up your mail in ballot or somehow have some other arrangement to pick up your ballots were there. But still 23,344 people voted when they should no longer, you know, have access, you know, would not normally have access at that given address.
reSee.it AI Summary
Overnight, 45K registered voters were added and then removed in Maricopa County, Arizona for the 2022 general election. Official records show the following: 2,435,397 registered voters at the cutoff, 2,480,880 before L&A testing (including the extra 45K), and 2,435,397 after L&A testing. Any registrations after the cutoff are excluded from the election. Share to help the people of Maricopa get the answers they deserve.
@Curiousityfirst - DogAndBone @Curious Cat
BREAKING: 45K EXTRA REGISTERED VOTERS ADDED OVERNIGHT IN MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2022 GENERAL ELECTION then REMOVED THEM DURING AN ELECTION.👇 Cutoff 11th October 2,435,397 L&A Testing 12th October 2,480,880 Election Certification 2,435,397 According to their Maricopa County's own official records. Slide 1: Registered Voters as at the Cutoff 2,435,397 Slide 2: Pre L&A - 2,480,880 (extra 45K) Slide 3: Post L&A - 2,435,397 Slide 4: Chart for visual understanding Any registrations after the cutoff are excluded from the 2022 election. Please retweet and share so that the good people of Maricopa can ask and get the answers they deserve. #Trump @AZGOP #Arizona #Trump2024 #Elections2024 @KariLake @KariLakeWarRoom @BlehmLawAZ @LeadingReport @FSociety_1942 @Rach_IC @Ryan_L_Heath @WendyRogersAZ @Peoples_Pundit @RealAmVoice @realLizUSA @AbrahamHamadeh @TalkMullins @ShawnSmith1776 @pjcolbeck @PatrickByrne @TPPatriots @realAlexKolodin @RealAlexJones #MerryChristmas @ElectionWiz @ArizonaSunTimes @elonmusk @KristenNHammond @JenWEsq @j3669 @RealSKeshel @RealMarkFinchem
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here’s the conspiracy that overturned the results of the 2020 election 11,326 people did not show up on Nov 7 voter rolls after votes were cast then appear on Dec 4 voter rolls Just to be clear they show they voted on Nov 3, 2020 Explanation: Katie Hobbs find me more votes https://t.co/LLatWJxukD
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the discussion, Speaker 1 mentions an interesting observation regarding the voter rolls. They found that 11,326 individuals who were not listed on the November 7th version of the voter rolls appeared on the December 4th version, despite showing as having voted in the recent election. Speaker 0 seeks an explanation for this discrepancy, emphasizing that they are not implying fraud but simply seeking answers. Speaker 1 admits they cannot think of a logical explanation and suggests reaching out to the county for clarification. The conversation ends there.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Thank you. Continue. Okay.
Speaker 1: So we have also seen some interesting things related to the voter rolls. So for example, we have 11,326 people that did not show up on November 7 version of the voter rolls that should have been after votes were cast but then appeared on December 4th voter rolls. And just to be clear, they show as voted in this past election, but they were not in November 7th version of the file, and they were they did show up on the December 4th version.
Speaker 0: Okay. That sounds confusing. Is there give me an explanation of why that might have I mean, we're not obviously, we're not saying there's fraud. We're not saying anything else. I'm just trying to find answers.
Is there a logical explanation why that would be?
Speaker 1: I cannot think of a logical explanation on what that would be. But it'd be a great thing to hear back from the county to see if there's anything that we're not thinking of.
Speaker 0: Okay. Thank you. Continue.
Speaker 1: So we
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here’s the AZ audit laying out more crimes certified by Katie Hobbs, Shelby Bush Not only 1,870 blank ballots were accepted in violation of A.R.S 16-550 they were CURED, STAMPED and VERIFIED without signatures on 11-8-20, 5 days after the statutory deadline of 7 pm election day, https://t.co/S6CaOUg6b3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a violation regarding blank envelopes in the election. They state that according to the statute, blank envelopes cannot be cured and must have a signature by 7 pm on election day. However, they found 1,870 cured ballots without signatures. One example is a blank envelope without a signature or phone number, which was cured and verified after the statutory expiration. Another ballot was received on election day. When questioned, the speaker confirms that the metadata shows the envelopes were cured on November 8th, five days after the election. Another speaker points out that the statute allows for five working days, excluding weekends and holidays. They argue that the election was on Tuesday, so only three days should be counted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1st violation we found was blank envelopes. The statute is very clear that a blank envelope has no ability to be cured. A signature must be rendered on that envelope by 7 pm on election day. However, we found 18 70 ballots that were cured against this particular statute. The first example you'll see here, it's blank with no signature.
It also does not include a phone number. Not only was this ballot cured and stamped verified without a signature, it was done so in a 5 day curing period, idea, which was 11/8, 5 days after the statutory expiration. The next one was received on election day. November
Speaker 1: to that point, madam chair.
Speaker 0: Go ahead.
Speaker 1: Miss, miss Busch, you're saying that you believe it was cured after the 5 day period?
Speaker 0: Madam Chair, Senator Bennet, yes, we have the metadata for these envelopes that tell us the date of any adaptations, changes, or curing. It will give us the date and time that that envelope was scanned back into the system as repaired or cured. And this one was metadata stamped as being cured on November 8th.
Speaker 1: And the election, madam chair, senate miss Bush, election was on what date?
Speaker 0: November 3rd.
Speaker 1: Madam chair, I believe the statute allows for 5 working days, and and that excludes the Saturday, Sunday. And in this election in 2022, Monday was a holiday. So Did you account for the business days, 5 days? Because I I believe that the election was on Tuesday. They had Wednesday, Thursday, Friday would have been the 3rd day.
Saturday, Sunday, And a holiday on Monday would not be included, and therefore, Tuesday and Wednesday of the following week would have been
Video Transcript AI Summary
On November 8th, it was discovered that blank envelopes were being subjected to a curing period, which goes against the stated policy. The speaker clarifies that if a signature box on an envelope is unsigned by 7 p.m. on election night, it cannot be cured. The speaker also mentions that in cases where there is no phone number provided, the county would typically refer to the voter registration record to contact the voter, but some registrations lack phone numbers. The transcript ends with another example of a ballot being cured without a signature, which violates the statute.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Correct. November 8th was well within the curing period. Right. The problem with this is blank envelopes are clearly stated in statute and also in the policy and procedure manual to not be subjected to a 5 day curing period. They must be resolved by 7 PM on election day.
Speaker 1: Okay. I've that I agree with, but, I thought you were saying that you found some of these ballots cured on November 8, Which was not within the 5 day period. What I think you're really saying is that in the case of unsigned signature boxes on envelopes, If it's unsigned as of 7 p. M. On election night, it's not curable in the 1st place?
Speaker 0: Madam chair, Senator Bennett, that is correct.
Speaker 1: Okay. Thank
Speaker 2: you. Thank you for that clarification. Just matching this slide, please.
Speaker 0: Yep. So, as you'll see, there's a few more examples of the same scenario.
Speaker 2: Madam Chair, quick question. Go ahead. Thank you, Madam Chair. And Mrs. Bush, If there's no phone number on there, how does the county contact the voter to tell them to come in all And verify.
Speaker 0: So madam chair, senator Borrelli, normally, the signature verification team would then need to lend to the voter record or the voter file, which would be their most recent voter registration record to pull those numbers. The unfortunate thing that we have found during this audit is that we actually have some accounts. None of those registrations have phone numbers. We also have reports from some of the signature verification team it worked in 2022 who said they had no numbers accessible to them when they were carrying ballots. So it it makes it more difficult, but it doesn't necessarily mean that the voter does not have a phone number available to the elections department.
Go ahead. So again, this is just a third example of that same scenario. This ballot was received on November 3rd by the elections department and then was given a carrying period and cured without a signature, which is again in violation of statute.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, The Arizona Audit CONFIRMS: Katie Hobbs utilized her single greatest crime of 2020 for the 2022 election. 25% of all 2020 mail-in-ballots equaling 420,987 ballots out of 1.9 million CONFIRMED to have NO signature match just in Maricopa County alone. https://t.co/eMyFdGhpTc
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Arizona audit, Maricopa County made it clear that signature verification was off-limits. However, it's easy to understand why they didn't want us to examine the signatures because, in reality, they don't match.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Talked about signature verification has been that 3rd rail in Maricopa County. You can't touch it. You can't talk about it. And that was really the line in the sand that the county drew during the Arizona audit. And it's not difficult to see why they don't want us looking at those signatures because guess what?
They don't match.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Signature verification is a process used to determine the legitimacy of a vote by comparing the voter's ballot envelope to the affidavit. In the 2020 election, 420,987 ballot envelopes failed signature verification, and the system was never fixed. As a result, the same issues persisted in the 2022 election, leaving the system vulnerable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So signature verification is a process by which you take the voter, ballot envelope and compare it to the affidavit in order to determine whether it's a legitimate vote. So there are 2 areas that we looked at that we wanna share with you today. The first one is the signature verification of 2020 and how that relates to 2022. 420,987 ballot envelopes failed signature verification in the 2020 election. The system was never repaired.
And because of that, those same issues that caused the massive amount of failures was still in existence in the 2020 election. In the 2020 in the 2022 election, which has left our system still vulnerable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election using 150 trained workers. They followed the guidelines in the secretary of state manual and analyzed each voter record individually. The statistics from the first 25% of the ballots were extrapolated to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 acknowledges that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, with about 1.9 million of them being mail-in ballots. Speaker 1 confirms this and the conversation continues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go back one slide. Who determined the the number 420,987 from the 2020 election? Is that your organization that determined there were that number of failed signatures, or was that the number reported by all of the counties in in Arizona?
Speaker 1: So madam chair, Senator Bennett, that number is based on a a, A review of a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the 2020 election. We used a 150 Trained workers that studied the secretary of state manual and followed those guidelines, And then they analyzed each voter record individually. Once we got the statistics for that first 25% or 400,000 ballots, Then it was extrapolated to determine the final number. Those are Maricopa County. That is just Maricopa County.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the point I was gonna make, madam chair, is I think Maricopa County alone, had 2,089,563 ballots in 2020, and 1 about 1,900,000 of them were by mail. And so Your group analyzed about 25 percent of those 1,900,000 in Maricopa County, Came up with a percentage that you considered to have failed signature verification, then you extrapolate it to get to the 429, 20,000.
Speaker 1: Madam chair, senator Bennett, that is correct.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Okay. Proceed.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, The Arizona Senate Audit CONFIRMS Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, There are 74, 243 mail in ballots that are TIED to individuals returned and cast in the Nov 3, 2020 election with NO RECORD of ever being SENT OUT. https://t.co/6jwN14wPtT
Video Transcript AI Summary
I ignored advice from a politician to avoid discussing the forensic audit, the 2020 election, distancing myself from President Trump, and questioning COVID vaccines and mandates. Instead, I visited the forensic audit site and openly talked about our corrupt elections. Now, more evidence is emerging every day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ben, I remember somebody who was in politics telling me when I first started, do not talk about the forensic audit. Don't talk about the 2020 election. Distance yourself from president Trump. And whatever you do, don't bring up COVID or question the vaccines or the mandates. And I looked at this guy, and I basically kicked him out.
And I took all of his suggestions and advice, and I threw it in the Trash can, and I immediately went down, and I toured the forensic audit site. And I started talking about our corrupt elections. And, you know, people have finally caught up. We're seeing some more evidence every single day come out.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Arizona, there are 74,243 mail-in ballots without a clear record of being sent. The state uses EB32s to track when a ballot is sent and EB33s to track when it is received. The number of EB32s should be higher than the number of EB33s. These 74,000 ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but there is no evidence that they were actually sent to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's EB32s and EB33s. EB32s is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent. And an EB33 is supposed to give a record of when the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EB32s more sent out than there are that are received.
Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to. And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, “We now know all of the different ways that are elections are rigged, taken, stolen, WHERE THE FRAUD IS and who is RESPONSIBLE for it” Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5M additional ballots, If Maricopa has 2,575,400 voters why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1M ballots? https://t.co/oEuSKsCFpI
Video Transcript AI Summary
We now know how elections are rigged, with Maricopa County mailing more ballots than voters. This shows extra ballots were printed to manipulate the election. States are avoiding scrutiny of ballots, and censorship of truth reveals we are on the right track.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what's going on is we now know all of the different ways that our elections are rigged, taken, stolen, where the fraud is, who's responsible for it, and how it happens. Short one. If Maricopa County has 2,005,400 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4,100,000 ballots? You know why? Because if you're gonna steal an election and it's going to be an election by mail predominantly, and if mail is the currency, mail is the contract that mail in ballot.
Well, if you're gonna swap ballots or or if you're gonna control it, you have to have extra ballots. Bottom line, they printed 1,500,000 additional ballots. That is why 2 things are occurring. All of these states are trying very hard to avoid us looking at the ballot. But the second thing, think about it.
If we were lying about what happened, if it was inconsequential, would they be censoring us? Do they censor people who don't matter? Do they censor topics that really are horse crap? No. They censor us because we have the goods, we have the truth.
So understand even censorship that's going on proves we're all on the right track.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the secret testing on election machines in Maricopa County, Arizona. He asks about discrepancies in signatures on mail-in ballots. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, oversaw elections in the area. Jordan expresses frustration and asks for a break while at the gym.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How's it going? Jordan Conrad with Gateway Plumbing. So, you know, I have some questions about the election in Arizona. You know, Maricopa County, they did these secret testing on the machines, which for the election procedures manual, you were supposed to oversee, do additional testing on. Did did you authorize this?
Miss Hobbs? Miss Hobbs, what about the signatures on the mailing ballot updates? Are you are you aware of what those look like? That they look nothing like the signatures of the voter? Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, we oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona either.
Fucking best for him. You mean I'm at the gym. Give it I'm at the gym. Give it a effing rest. Is that what you said?
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
🚨BREAKING🚨 + 10,000 illegal aliens, using the same exact social security number voted in the Nov 3, 2020 election, and this is just in the border state of Arizona, 📝Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, https://t.co/Zx8DKb6xAB
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found 10,000 people sharing one Social Security number, enabling illegal workers to avoid paying taxes. Employers use the same number for multiple workers, and the IRS overlooks the issue. This scheme allows non-citizens to obtain driver's licenses and voter registration. The government holds a $1.7 trillion slush fund, generating $100 million in interest monthly. This corruption is why some tried to silence us, revealing a unified political system benefiting from these practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We discovered 10,000 people using the exact Social Security number. See if this one rings true. You take an illegal. You bring them in. They sign a piece of paper promising to pay taxes.
What they get is a Social Security number so the employers can take out the taxes. Put a pin in that. Here's what they do. In cities like this, let's think of a chicken processor. They will bring in 100 of illegals.
They will spread them out across all of these plants and factories, giving them jobs. They're all using the same Social Security number. The IRS unconnected our names from the Social Security number. Now when you look it up, it just pings to see if there's an employer. If there is, it says it's good.
It validates it. Why do they do that? Because all of these factories are giving them Social Security numbers. The government turns its back on it. As soon as you have a Social Security number and you go over to motor voter, pass the driver's court, test.
Right? You get a driver's license. Suppression, look, you got a social. You must be a citizen. That's how they pack the roles.
By the way, those guys don't pay taxes anyway. It's taken out by companies. Our government's been sitting on $1,700,000,000,000 slush fund that that one fund has still in it to this day. So if you wanna know where the dark money comes from. By the way, that's what, a $100,000,000 in Per month.
A month in interest. I could go on. I now understand this is why they tried to kill us, and it's not stuff I wanted to know. It's not stuff I wanted to know about my country. It's not stuff I believed, But we have a uni party.
We don't have multiple parties. Everybody's benefited from this at one time or another.
@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington
Maricopa County’s OWN election records show they unlawfully counted over 20,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4, 2020 and later. That’s more than twice the election “margin.” Arizona’s elections are rigged. They have to arrest you in order to keep their corrupt power. https://t.co/Z0ECvkcGlF
reSee.it AI Summary
The Arizona Senate Audit reveals that two independent forensic experts have concluded that Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes inserted over 25,000 counterfeit ballots into the 2020 General Election, suggesting a potential criminal enterprise certified by the U.S. Congress on January 6th.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, The Arizona Senate Audit of the 2020 election CONFIRMS, Two FORENSIC EXPERTS completely independent of each other CONCLUDE. Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes inserted +25,000 COUNTERFEIT ballots into the Arizona 2020 General Election, 📝Meaning U.S. Congress certified a criminal enterprise on Jan 6.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the usual PDF format for the election process in Maricopa County. These ballots are tailored to specific geographical areas to account for different voting preferences. The ballots are created in advance in PDF format for mail-in and early voting convenience. However, the quality of the printed ballots in this case was significantly lower than expected, indicating a problem with the printing process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other finding here was that we had approximately 25,000 ballots that were not created from the PDF that is used for the election process. So in other words, the election provider comes up with ballots and it's specific to a geographical area because the person that lives in this neighborhood might not be voting for the same people that live in that neighborhood or another neighborhood. So here in Maricopa County from memory, you had 5,012 or something like that, just over 5,000 different permutations and combinations to the ballots. Then that's multiplied by 2 because there's a Spanish version that's available for each one of these ballots, but it's the same ballot with the same people just in a different language. So we've got 5, we'll just say 5,000 different ballots for now that are created ahead of time and those are created in PDF.
Now, the big reason why is you have a third party send out mail in ballots, so those have to be created in advance. And second, for your early voting, you have vote on demand. So in other words, even if I live way out in the corner of the county but I work downtown, I could go to something downtown that could print my ballot from my area and I could vote here. It's convenient. A lot of people do that.
These PDFs are created in advance. They're obviously good quality PDFs and when they're printed, they should look roughly or exactly the same. In this group of ballots, I find that the quality is severely degraded from what a PDF would be as if printed on demand or if printed by your, 3rd party provider who prints these all the time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I found that there were 5,000 different ballots created for specific districts in Maricopa County. Additionally, approximately 25,000 ballots did not match the official Dominion PDF ballot, with consistent imperfections around an oval on each one. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's 10,457 vote margin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There were 2 primary findings, that I had. Number 1 is that there were a series of ballots, that I examined the photographs of, of. And Dominion as the election subcontractor produced ballots for each of the zones or districts that were involved, at least in the area that I looked at here in Maricopa County, and there were 5,000 approximately a little over different ballots. As you know in a state there could be 2 different senator races, there could be 10 different house races, and all the permutations and combinations is what gives you the 5,000. So they create a final ballot for each one of these districts or zones or regions, so that when you go in and you give your name and it knows you're from this area, you would get this ballot to vote on all the issues that pertain to you and only the issues that pertain to you.
And I found that there were about 25,000 ballots that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. In other words, the printing process, appearance, is completely different than what you would get from a 1st generation PDF printing. As you can imagine, the lines are perfect, so they're perfectly straight, no breaks in them circles or ovals as they may be, and they're a solid line. When I examined some of the early voting ballots and election day ballots from various polling locations, there were about 25,000 that did not have printing from this perfect PDF as you would expect, but instead had breaks in all the same places around an oval. So you can look at one of the ovals and there are imperfections in the line, and they're in the same place on every single one of these ballots.
These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent over double the amount of Joe Joe Biden's 10,457 vote margin
Video Transcript AI Summary
In June of 2021, we informed them of suspected counterfeit ballots. Despite warnings, GOP propaganda cast doubt on the legitimacy of the ballots. Officials knew about this but failed to prevent a repeat in 2022. Their inaction enabled the same issue to occur in 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Early on, I want you to know, in July of 21 actually, before that, we, we told them in June. We told them that we suspected, from what we're seeing, 25,000 plus counterfeit inauthentic ballots. That was early on in the process. Again, because of propaganda by the GOP's attorney, the GOP, other conservative operatives, they planted the seed inside this that you can't trust that. No.
That's not it, etcetera. You'll hear more about it. But everyone of the people up there knew this in advance, even up this hearing today. Now the reason I bring that up is they had well over a year and a half to react to this, so it wouldn't be duplicated in 2022, but they didn't. They did nothing, and they allowed it.
They enabled this to be done again in 2020.
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
Arizona 2020 Maricopa Forensic Ballot Audit - 2.1M ballots each examined by hand and high rez photographed front and back. 10%+ found to be non-conforming (counterfeit). Legacy media lies about it all, says they found nothing except some extra Biden votes. https://t.co/D0s6qu0141
reSee.it AI Summary
The Arizona Senate audit reveals evidence of potential election fraud, with thousands of mail-in ballots tied to individuals without records of being sent out. This raises questions about the legitimacy of the 2020 Presidential election. Additionally, the author accuses the U.S. Congress of being aware of a criminal enterprise during the January 6 certification process.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, The Arizona Senate AUDIT CONFIRMS beyond the shadow of a doubt Trump is the legitimate President of the 2020 Presidential election, Katie Hobbs inserted 74, 243 MAIL IN BALLOTS in the Nov 3, 2020 election that are TIED to individuals returned and cast with NO RECORD of ever being SENT OUT. 📝U.S. Congress certified a criminal enterprise on Jan 6. And they all know it,
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s track when ballots are sent, and EB33s track when they are received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots were tied to specific individuals, but we lack proof they were sent to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's EB32s and EB33s. EB32s is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent, and an EB-33s is supposed to give a record of when the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EV32s more sent out than there are that are received. Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to.
And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I ignored advice to avoid discussing the forensic audit, 2020 election, Trump, COVID, vaccines, and mandates. Instead, I visited the audit site, talked about corrupt elections, and people are now seeing more evidence daily.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ben, I remember somebody who was in politics telling me when I first started, do not talk about the forensic audit. Don't talk about the 2020 election. Distance yourself from president Trump. And whatever you do, don't bring up COVID or question the vaccines or the mandates. And I looked at this guy, and I basically kicked him out.
And I took all of his suggestions and advice, and I threw it in the trash can. And I immediately went down, and I toured the forensic audit site. And I started talking about our corrupt elections. And, you know, people have finally caught up. We're seeing some more evidence every single day come out.
@RealPizzaPepe - Pizza Pepe
ICYMI🚨 The Arizona Senate audit confirms 74k mail-in ballots have no record of being sent out. Trump won Arizona. https://t.co/96pM30lGSd
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no clear record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s show when a ballot is sent, and EB33s show when it's received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but 74,000 came back without proof of being sent to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's EB32s and EB33s. EB32s is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent, and an EB-33s is supposed to give a record of when the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EV32s more sent out than there are that are received. Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to.
And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I ignored advice to avoid discussing the forensic audit, 2020 election, Trump, COVID, vaccines, and mandates. Instead, I visited the audit site, talked about corrupt elections, and people are now seeing more evidence daily.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ben, I remember somebody who was in politics telling me when I first started, do not talk about the forensic audit. Don't talk about the 2020 election. Distance yourself from president Trump. And whatever you do, don't bring up COVID or question the vaccines or the mandates. And I looked at this guy, and I basically kicked him out.
And I took all of his suggestions and advice, and I threw it in the trash can. And I immediately went down, and I toured the forensic audit site. And I started talking about our corrupt elections. And, you know, people have finally caught up. We're seeing some more evidence every single day come out.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Arizona Senate Audit reveals that 25% of 2020 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County, totaling 420,987 out of 1.9 million, had no signature match. This raises concerns about the integrity of the election and its potential impact on the 2024 presidential election.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, The Arizona Senate Audit, CONFIRMS: the criminals, Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes utilizing their single greatest crime of 2020 and 2022 for the 2024 presidential election, 25% of all 2020 MAIL-IN-BALLOTS equaling 420,987, out of 1.9 million, CONFIRMED to have NO SIGNATURE MATCH. And just in Maricopa County alone.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The number of 420,987 failed signatures in the 2020 election was determined by reviewing a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes in Maricopa County. Trained workers followed guidelines to analyze each voter record individually, leading to the extrapolation of the final number. This analysis focused solely on Maricopa County's ballots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One slide. Go back one slide. Who determined the the number 420,987 from the 2020 election? Was that your organization that determined there were that number of failed signatures, or was that the number reported by all of the counties in in Arizona?
Speaker 1: So madam chair, senator Bennett, that number is based on a a, review of a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the 2020 election. We used a 150 trained workers that studied the secretary of state manual and followed those guidelines, and then they analyzed each voter record individually. Once we got the statistics for that first 25% or 400,000 ballots, then it was extrapolated to determine the final number. Those are Maricopa County. That is just Maricopa County.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the point I was gonna make, madam chair, is I think Maricopa County alone, had 2,089,563 ballots in 2020, and 1 about 1,900,000 of them were by mail. And so your group analyzed about 25% of those $1,900,000 in Maricopa County, came up with a percentage that you considered to have failed signature verification, then you extrapolate it to get to the 429 20,000.
Speaker 1: Madam chair, senator Bennett, that is correct.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Okay. Proceed.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Maricopa County has been resistant to discussing signature verification during the Arizona audit because the signatures don't match.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About signature verification has been that 3rd rail in Maricopa County. You can't touch it. You can't talk about it. And that was really the line in the sand that the county drew during the Arizona audit. And it's not difficult to see why they don't want us looking at those signatures because guess what?
They don't match.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the election in Arizona, specifically mentioning secret machine testing in Maricopa County and discrepancies in mailing ballot signatures. He asks if she authorized the testing and if she is aware of the signature issues. Jordan criticizes Miss Hobbs for overseeing elections in Maricopa County and Arizona.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How's it going? Jordan Conrad with Gateway Plumbing. So, you know, I have some questions about the election in Arizona. You know, Maricopa County, they did these secret testing on the machines, which for the election procedures manual, you were supposed to oversee, do additional testing on. Did did you authorize this?
Miss Hobbs? Miss Hobbs, what about the signatures on the mailing ballot updates? Are you are you aware of what those look like? That they look nothing like the signatures of the voter? Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, we oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona either.
Fucking best for
reSee.it AI Summary
The Arizona Senate audit reveals that Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes allegedly inserted 74,243 mail-in ballots in the November 2020 election, linked to individuals with no record of ballots being sent out. I believe this is part of a significant misinformation campaign surrounding the election.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, The ARIZONA SENATE AUDIT CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes inserted 74, 243 MAIL IN BALLOTS in the Nov 3, 2020 election that are TIED to individuals returned and cast with NO RECORD of ever being SENT OUT. 📝On Jan 6 U.S. Congress certified one of the greatest MISINFORMATION AND DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN in United States election history. And they all know it,
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Arizona, there are 74,243 mail-in ballots with no clear record of being sent. The state uses EB32 forms to track when mail-in ballots are sent and EB33 forms for when they are received. There should be more EB32s sent out than EB33s received. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but for these 74,000 cases, there is no clear indication that they were ever mailed to anyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Example, we have 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's EB32s and EB33s. EB32s is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent. And an EB33 is supposed to give a record of when the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EV32s more sent out than there are that are received.
Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to. And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was advised not to discuss the forensic audit, the 2020 election, or to distance myself from Trump, and to avoid questioning COVID, vaccines, and mandates. I rejected this advice and chose to focus on these issues instead. I visited the forensic audit site and began speaking out about election corruption. Now, more evidence is emerging daily, and people are starting to catch on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Spend. I remember somebody who was in politics telling me when I first started, do not talk about the forensic audit. Don't talk about the 2020 election. Distance yourself from president Trump. And whatever you do, don't bring up COVID or question the vaccines or the mandates.
And I looked at this guy, and I basically kicked him out. And I took all of his suggestions and advice, and I threw it in the trash can. And I immediately went down, and I toured the forensic audit site. And I started talking about our corrupt elections. And, you know, people have finally caught up.
We're seeing some more evidence every single day come out.
reSee.it AI Summary
I found that over 10,000 illegal aliens used the same Social Security number to vote in the Arizona 2020 General Election, just in Arizona. Claiming that illegals aren't voting is as misleading as saying the border is secure. Adrian Fontes was involved in registering them.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And we have found, that +10,000 illegal aliens using the same exact Social Security number voted in the Arizona 2020 General Election. And that’s only in the border state of Arizona. Saying Illegals are not voting, it’s like saying the border is secure. Just ask Adrian Fontes, he was one who registered them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are committed to ensuring that only U.S. citizens participate in elections, and so far, there is no evidence of noncitizen voting. However, there have been instances where noncitizens voted; this year, 135 were identified as having voted, with another 400 registered but not yet voting. Just because something is illegal doesn't mean we shouldn't have measures in place to prevent it, similar to how we maintain TSA for air travel security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As well. We're doing everything we can to ensure that noncitizens are not able to vote and that only US citizens vote in our election. And it's working. There's no evidence that noncitizens are voting. If they were
Speaker 1: Mister LaRose, I'm gonna let you follow-up on on the statement from his desk. We we found a 135 this year that had voted. We found another 400 that were registered but hadn't yet voted. This idea that it's already illegal. It's illegal to hijack airplanes, but we don't get rid of the TSA.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found 10,000 people using the same Social Security number. Illegal immigrants are brought in, sign a paper to pay taxes, and receive Social Security numbers for employers to withhold taxes. In factories, many workers use the same number, which the IRS validates as long as there's an employer linked. This process allows them to obtain driver's licenses, misleading officials into thinking they are citizens. Meanwhile, these workers often don’t pay taxes directly, as companies handle that. The government has a $1.7 trillion slush fund, generating significant interest. This situation reveals a unified political system benefiting from these practices, which raises concerns about the integrity of our country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We discovered 10,000 people using the exact Social Security number. See if this one rings true. You take an illegal. You bring them in. They sign a piece of paper promising to pay taxes.
What they get is a Social Security number so the employers can take out the taxes. Put a pin in that. Here's what they do. In cities like this, let's think of a chicken processor. They will bring in 100 of illegals.
They will spread them out across all of these plants and factories, giving them jobs. They're all using the same Social Security number. The IRS unconnected our names from the Social Security number. Now when you look it up, it just pings to see if there's an employer. If there is, it says it's good.
It validates it. Why do they do that? Because all of these factories are giving them Social Security numbers. The government turns its back on it. Soon as you have a Social Security number and you go over to motor voter, pass the driver's court test, right, you get a driver's license.
The person looks, you got a social, you must be a citizen. That's how they pack the roles. By the way, those guys don't pay taxes anyway. It's taken out by companies. Our government's been sitting on $1,700,000,000,000 slush fund that, that one fund has still in it to this day.
So if you want to know where the dark money comes from. By the way, that's what, a $100,000,000 in, a month in interest. I could go on. I now understand this is why they tried to kill us, and it's not stuff I wanted to know. It's not stuff I wanted to know about my country.
It's not stuff I believed. But we have a uni party. We don't have multiple parties. Everybody's benefited from this at one time or another.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here we go again, The 2020 Arizona Senate Audit CONFIRMS: 25% of all 2020 MAIL-IN-BALLOTS equaling 420,987, out of 1.9 million, CONFIRMED to have NO SIGNATURE MATCH WHATSOEVER. And this is just in Maricopa County alone. https://t.co/xDfIlP0XvJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election?
That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number.
It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes.
Yes, that is correct.
Thank you.
Proceed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go back one slide. Who determined the the number 420,987,987 from the 2020 election? Was that your organization that determined there were that number of failed signatures, or was that the number reported by all of the counties in in Arizona?
Speaker 1: So madam chair, senator Bennett, that number is based on a a, review of a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the 2020 election. We used a 150 trained workers that studied the secretary of state manual and followed those guidelines. And then they analyzed each voter record individually. Once we got the statistics for that first 25% or 400,000 ballots, then it was extrapolated to determine the final number. Those are Maricopa County.
That is just Maricopa County.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the point I was gonna make, madam chair, is I think Maricopa County alone, had 2,089,563 ballots in 2020, and 1 about 1,900,000 of them were by mail. And so your group analyzed about 25% of those 1,900,000 in Maricopa County, came up with a percentage that you considered to have failed signature verification, then you extrapolate it to get to the 429 20,000.
Speaker 1: Madam chair, senator Bennett, that is correct.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Okay. Proceed.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Signature verification has been a controversial topic in Maricopa County, often avoided in discussions. This was evident during the Arizona audit, where the county firmly opposed any scrutiny of signatures. The reluctance to examine these signatures suggests that there are discrepancies, as they do not match.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Talked about. Signature verification has been that 3rd rail in Maricopa County. You can't touch it. You can't talk about it. And that was really the line in the sand that the county drew during the Arizona audit.
And it's not difficult to see why they don't want us looking at those signatures because guess what? They don't match.