TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@Angelo4justice3 - Angelo Giuliano
Same techniques, same animals....and they want to lecture the world about human rights and democracy. https://t.co/sxbceSSdi6
@VincentCrypt46 - Vincent Kennedy
!Warning! Video of violent insurrectionists on January 6th 2021 https://t.co/hzAHk6AYZi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude to the officers and blesses them. They appreciate the mousetraping and describe it as glorious, comparing the smell to that of an old church. They conclude by thanking the officers again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, officers. God bless you, guys. Thank you for your patience.
We really appreciate it. We got mousetraping. That is glorious in person, isn't it? That is glorious. It smells like an old church.
Thank you, guys.
@SolomonYue - Solomon Yue
#Xitler already ordered 100,000 #PLA soldiers to enter #Beijing‼️ Spontaneous commemoration of #LiKeqiangI has been spreading to many cities‼️ Would Chinese people come out en masse to turn Li's commemoration into a mass protest against their Führer⁉️ #Tiananmenmassacre 2.0❓ https://t.co/mpYY7b4T8o
@NFSC_HAGnews - NFSC_HAGnews
An influencer who fled China discusses her experiences of having social media accounts banned and being detained by the CCP. One of her video that is circulating online, points out how CCP employs extremely despicable methods to bring about social death for the Chinese people. https://t.co/UMl6yDnXM9
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was first banned last year in August for posting a video criticizing Wang Shu and his children. The video went viral on Twitter, accumulating millions of views. My social media accounts, including my Weibo and Baidu accounts, were suspended, and I was taken away by the police for questioning. They didn't find any evidence of the crimes they accused me of, so they released me after several hours. In May of this year, another old video of mine was used by the US as an introduction to their own video. It gained over 500,000 views. I was harassed and threatened during my detention, and my husband's job was also affected. I was released after 24 hours, but my income and reputation suffered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 而 我 第 一 次 被 封 行 是 在 去 年 也 就 是 2 0 2 年 的 8 月 份 因 为 我 发 表 了 一 起 标 记 为 王 叔 不 和 他 的 孩 子 们 这 个 视 频 被 他 人 担 应 到 推 特 上 当 时 个 视 频 的 不 方 量 高 达 千 万 在 8 月 2 3 号 我 五 1 5 5 2 再 次 的 那 个 东 音 帐 号 还 有 一 个 十 0 万 的 的 百 度 帐 号 还 有 多 个 几 万 者 次 其 他 平 台 的 账 号 被 关 风 随 后 在 8 月 2 9 号 晚 上 大 概 是 晚 上 9 店 饭 ��� 右 我 们 家 上 吃 饭 我 们 小 去 保 带 了 不 留 个 国 安 的 人 传 我 家 就 先 我 带 走 我 老 在 口 那 人 打 下 来 我 交 的 小 孩 了 小 孩 害 怕 我 就 阿 福 老 共 手 跌 冲 动 不 如 我 回 来 结 果 他 们 是 在 我 手 机 上 没 有 找 到 任 何 实 字 性 的 他 们 想 要 的 那 种 犯 罪 证 明 就 放 了 有 整 个 这 个 过 程 大 概 四 五 小 时 吧 你 就 放 了 就 方 了 没 有 任 何 文 件 而 知 道 今 年 2 0 2 3 年 就 是 今 天 的 5 月 份 我 的 一 个 旧 视 品 被 美 国 指 引 接 续 片 段 为 他 们 视 频 开 头 接 行 拔 表 但 是 品 们 方 量 超 过 了 5 0 万 直 到 6 月 2 8 号 上 午 大 概 9 点 多 有 五 年 最 上 是 分 局 的 人 在 时 场 你 么 家 他 们 就 是 当 了 一 个 六 岁 孩 子 这 在 生 命 了 孩 子 的 强 行 给 我 带 走 我 来 不 说 总 老 公 回 来 了 不 行 说 打 电 话 然 了 我 赶 紧 处 北 他 回 来 然 后 又 委 託 的 邻 居 帮 我 交 开 孩 子 我 骗 文 女 如 说 我 说 妈 妈 是 帮 他 去 找 坏 人 去 然 后 我 扭 着 那 个 情 绪 平 说 就 是 让 我 来 那 种 靠 人 上 在 这 期 间 呢 前 面 十 多 小 时 不 能 汽 车 没 有 食 物 没 有 水 而 且 非 有 辱 骂 威 胁 恐 吓 说 家 还 在 以 后 商 都 问 体 说 你 这 种 行 会 影 响 他 医 生 交 工 中 整 个 过 程 他 一 直 是 在 用 我 孩 子 恐 吓 甚 至 他 之 妹 我 老 公 也 是 参 与 者 花 来 另 国 人 吃 饭 才 我 去 了 他 厕 给 我 一 个 水 话 我 被 关 了 件 2 4 个 小 时 才 是 释 放 用 恩 手 印 又 签 字 他 们 要 要 求 我 随 时 等 待 警 方 茶 会 而 且 再 三 的 高 手 他 是 这 种 行 为 就 是 学 线 姿 水 可 以 关 的 一 年 人 家 看 这 表 下 了 等 我 到 了 家 里 我 也 才 知 道 就 是 在 我 被 拘 留 的 当 天 国 安 的 人 打 电 话 到 我 家 伙 公 所 侦 查 情 况 他 们 老 问 他 事 这 国 老 公 就 停 止 了 没 说 开 除 但 几 乎 就 是 这 个 意 思 就 是 我 家 瞬 件 就 失 去 了 收 入 来 吧 防 正 面 临 断 公 还 是 学 费 没 小 路 没 说 他 们 就 是 用 这 种 起 对 对 手 段 让 务 们 让 我 们 社 不 经 死 亡
@LPNational - Libertarian Party
@VivekGRamaswamy The bloody battle that nearly ended the republic on January 6, caught on film: https://t.co/PsSjrxxhza
Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to the US Capitol Building! Join us for the insurrection and check out our promotional leaflets. Stay in the safety quadrant and ask our capital police officers for directions. Enjoy activities like a photography tour, fancy dress competition, and climbing wall (remember the safety ropes). Jacob Chansley wins the competition and can claim a guided tour. Please clean up after yourselves, visit the souvenir shop, and join us on the outdoor terrace for Nancy Loses Insurrection Soiree with refreshments and music from our winner.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the US Capitol Building. If you've joined us today for the insurrection, please make sure you pick up a promotional leaflet on the way in. Stay inside the safety quadrant at all times. And if you get lost, speak to one of our capital police officers, they'll be sure to to point you in the right direction. And be sure to set aside a little time today to join us for some insurrection activities including our photography tour, our fancy dress competition, and have a go on our climbing wall.
But don't forget those safety ropes. And I've now received the results of our fancy dress competition. The winner today is Jacob Chansley. That's mister Jacob Chansley. If you could report to your nearest Capitol Police Officer, they'll be sure to give you your prize, a guided tour of the building.
Wherever possible, please try to clean up after yourselves. Don't forget to visit the souvenir shop on the way out, and feel free to join us on the outdoor terrace for Nancy Loses Insurrection Soiree, grab yourself a light refreshment, and enjoy the music of our very own fancy dress competition winner.
@jenniferzeng97 - Inconvenient Truths by Jennifer Zeng 曾錚真言
This video's opening scene will shake you to your core and make you ask: Is this the hidden reality of China? Hear what analysts have to say and join the conversation!🧐 #XiJinping #CCP #China #CCPChina #Chinanews #ChinaStory #CultrualRevolution https://t.co/OmERhXqKtB
Video Transcript AI Summary
On the 130th anniversary of Mao Zedong's birth, protests erupted in China, with people calling for a return to the Mao era and the Cultural Revolution. Many argue that after 40 years of reform and opening up, around 600 million people in China still live in poverty, and their situation is worsening due to the pandemic and deteriorating relations with countries like the US. With no legal channels for seeking social justice, frustration and grievances are growing, and some see a second Cultural Revolution as an opportunity for change. The middle class, who are also facing economic decline, may desire a cultural revolution to overthrow the current system. However, the consequences of such a revolution are uncertain, and the future of China remains worrying.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello everyone, welcome to Inconvenient Truths. I'm your host Jennifer Zeng. The video you just watched shows unbelievable since that happened recently on the eve and the day of The 130th anniversary of the birth of Mao Zedong, the first generation leader of the Chinese Communist Party In his hometown Shaoshan, He, Hunan province, issues as state crowds were shouting slogans like We want to nearing public ownership, not private ownership disguised under Marxist Marxist Banners. We want the real Mao Zedong thought and long live the cultural revolution. The slogan we want to nearing public ownership, not private ownership disguised under Marxist banners clearly expresses dissatisfaction with the current situation in China.
They are calling for a return to the Mao era, advocating for the 2 socialist path and even directly shouting slogans like long live the Cultural revolution. Previously, people often said that Xi Jinping wanted to initiate A second cultural revolution returning to the era of a planned economy. However, few explored How many ordinary people were actually calling for another Cultural Revolution too? In fact, Some commentators argue that currently in China, whether at the social grassroots level, the so called middle class, After 40 years of the so called reform and opening up, there are still 600,000,000 people With a monthly income below 1,000 yuan, roughly 140 US dollars, This means that nearly half of China's population is barely solving the problem of basic needs. They are still in poverty, and their living standards are even worse than refugees in Gaza.
With the pandemic lockdowns and deteriorating relations with countries like the US, These people's meager income of 140 US dollars per month may soon disappear. For the lower social strata who have nothing to lose and with the current stability maintenance system of the CCP, Sealing of any legal channels for seeking social justice, the frustration and grievances among this segment of society will continue to accumulate, especially as the Economy declines. These people need an eruption, and the 2nd generation Cultural revolution is precisely the opportunity they've been waiting for for decades. Once there's a legitimate pretext Once this file ignites, no one will be able to extinguish the grievances of these The economic downturn is directly pushing the middle class back into poverty. Houses they struggled for decades to buy may turn into negative assets within a short year as property prices collapse.
In this situation, They may end up owing the bank a considerable amount. The crucial point is that with the decoupling with the US, Job opportunities in China will further decrease leading to a further decline in income. Their future living standard will continue to deteriorate, possibly falling into poverty. They also urgently need a change in this declining reality. However, both at the policy and the political levels, There's no legal channel or any meaningful change.
A nationwide movement or upheaval might be the only opportunity to change their circumstances. After all, for them, it's neither falling to the bottom or becoming the master of the country. In this situation, the middle class might also want a cultural revolution as they desire change and a chance to thoroughly overthrow the current totalitarian system and become the masters and backbone of the nation. For the higher ups, Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution provided ambitious individuals with a perfect template There is no legitimate opportunity for any else to for for anyone else to take over. However, Xi's desire to launch a second cultural revolution precisely provides these ambitious individuals Power because according to normal procedures, Mao would never have been able to regain power from then president Liu Shaoqi.
We discussed the event after the great famine in the previous episode Where Mao Zedong lost power after the 7,000 colors conference in 1962. If you haven't seen that episode yet, please check it out on my channel. Now for the other high ranking members of the CCP, Inside Xi to launch a second culture revolution. Therefore, they were all vigorously advocate for Xi to initiate A second Cultural Revolution. Actually, the only one in all of China who doesn't need a Cultural Revolution is Xi Jinping himself.
However, Xi is not aware of this. He has not realized that the only consequence For initiating a second cultural revolution is for himself to be overthrown. Given his level of intelligence, he fails to understand this logic. During his years, he was deeply impacted by the Cultural Revolution and simplisticly thinks that the Cultural Revolution was just a mass struggle against the masses. Therefore, he strongly promotes the so called experience of mobilizing the masses to fight against The masses, attempting to use this to resolve the increasingly sharp conflicts in Chinese society, He fundamentally doesn't comprehend the underlying logic of the Cultural Revolution, Which is the illegal seizure of power, Xi Jinping attempts to use the experience of mass struggles during the Cultural revolution to eliminate social conflicts.
Meanwhile, the high ranking members of the CCP want to use the form of Ordering their declining social status and preserving their interests, the lower class attempts to break all old Old systematic orders saw various movements changing their increasingly intensifying comprehensively and the lack of legal means to change and protect their interests, All strata of Chinese society urgently need a comprehensive movement similar to the cultural revolution and establishing a new regime. The above is not my opinion, but I think it makes some sense. Although the Chinese people have experienced the suffering of the Cultural Revolution, they have not truly reflected or criticized it. Therefore, some still worship Mao Zedong amidst the era of Mao as we've witnessed in a video I played at the beginning. The current leaders of the CCP, including Xi Jinping, grew up during the Cultural Revolution, Although many of them were also persecuted due to the Stockholm syndrome, they admire Mao even more.
Mao's approach is the only template they can refer to, so when problems arise, they still consider using the methods of the Cultural Revolution. In this sense, the massive turmoil of a second Cultural Revolution in China is not Many Chinese people have been exposed to and yearn for the western idea of democracy and freedom, Hoping that China can become a free country. However, the number of such people, their willingness and ability To drive positive change and whether they can overcome the larger population with the cultural revolution ideology are all uncertain. So it's really worrying to see where China will go next. Would you agree?
Well, that's all for today. From now on, I will make some more efforts to produce members and donors
@Defundmedianow - Sarah Smith
@libsoftiktok Yikes! 1966 Mao Zedong used an army of College students to carry out his Cultural Revolution. Makes me wonder what’s happening here.. https://t.co/XUHNrHZgUD
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Canada, communists rallied in major cities to build a revolutionary party. They aim to overthrow Canadian imperialism and unite communists nationwide. In the US, calls for revolution are growing, especially on college campuses. The speaker warns of the dangers of history repeating itself, citing Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution as an example of how college students can be manipulated into committing atrocities. The speaker emphasizes the vulnerability of young adults to extremist ideologies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is gonna be a 2 parter. First, here's what's going on in Canada.
Speaker 1: Communism is back. Last week, communists from across the country took to the streets under the red banner of communism. Vancouver, Victoria, Toronto, Ottawa, Edmonton, Montreal, Quebec City, and Sherbrooke.
Speaker 2: We are building this party to overthrow Canadian imperialism.
Speaker 1: People honked in support, filmed us, and some even joined in on the marches. In the days since, we've had dozens of communists across Canada write into us and ask if they can join the RCP. This is only the beginning. Last weekend shows the incredible potential that exists in this country for a mass revolutionary communist party. We need to harness this potential and organize it into a mass fighting force.
This is why we need every communist from the biggest city to the smallest town to build a communist cell where you live and work. And this May, we are all coming together to discuss how we will overthrow this fucked up system once and for all.
Speaker 0: Simultaneously, here's what's going on in the US.
Speaker 2: There is only one solution. It is by a revolution.
Speaker 3: And And
Speaker 0: here's another example.
Speaker 2: You're not welcome here.
Speaker 4: You're not welcome here. Because everyone thinks You're not welcome here.
Speaker 3: You are so complicit in this set aside, and you don't even care.
Speaker 2: We're respectable to you.
Speaker 0: Why is this dangerous? Because this is happening on college campuses. These are our future leaders, teachers, instructors, and so on. And do you think that they're going to stand behind and support the American dream? No.
They're going to do everything that they can to destroy it.
Speaker 5: In 1966, Mao Zedong used an army of college students to carry out his cultural revolution. Over the next 10 years, they killed as many as 2,000,000 people and imprisoned even more. The goal was to rid the country of people who weren't loyal communists and loyal to Mao. He was able to convince college kids to commit these atrocities because they're the dumbest adults. And it's not their fault.
They just became adults, but they don't know how adults treat other adults and how adults can manipulate other adults. And because they have nothing and have done nothing with their life so far, they're very vulnerable to people telling them they're important and powerful. Just listen to this one college kid from
Speaker 1: just the the other day.
Speaker 3: We're living out the values that we were taught, in our studies here.
Speaker 5: You see, not even thinking for herself, just blindly doing what she was taught. That's why we use them to fight our wars and you can't be president till you're 35.
Speaker 0: Because they're morons and don't realize this has been tried time and time again and it never works. Because eventually, you run out of other people's money.
@spotlightoncn - Spotlight on China
After 35 years, a photo of the Tiananmen massacre was published for the first time Scholar Wu Renhua was one of many who participated in and witnessed the bloody massacre of democracy protesters that the army of the Chinese Communist Party committed in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Scholar Wu Renhua shared a photo of 3 Tiananmen Square massacre victims, taken at China University of Political Science and Law. Witnessed by around 20 people, the bodies were moved inside a lecture hall after being transported by a truck. On June 4, 1989, 11 people died when a tank collided with protesters. Internet users also shared a Hong Kong newspaper article reporting over 10,000 deaths during the massacre, highlighting the brutality of the CCP troops.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Scholar Wu Renhua was one of many who participated in and witnessed the bloody massacre of democracy protesters that the army of the Chinese Communist Party committed in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989. On May 28, Wu posted a photo on x of 3 people who died in the Tiananmen Square massacre. He claimed that this was the first time the photo had been published, and the photographer did not want to reveal his his name for safety reasons. Wu stated that this photo was taken at noon on June 4, 1989 at the China University of Political Science and Law or CUPL. Wu and approximately 20 other people witnessed these bodies firsthand on that day.
Wu reported that at approximately 6 AM on June 4th, 3 Chinese army tanks pursued a group of students as they were leaving Tiananmen Square. Tank number 106 collided with protesters, resulting in the deaths of 11 people and causing injuries to many others. A driver in Beijing took the initiative to use a truck to transport the bodies of 5 students to the CUPL as evidence for a future lawsuit against the military for a massacre. Then the 5 bodies were moved inside the lecture hall due to the hot sun outside. By noon that day, 2 bodies had been identified and taken away by the school.
Many people commented on Wu's post on X, stating that they were also present at the scene and witnessed the incident, as Wu recounted. In a related development, many Internet users shared photos of the front page of Hong Kong's Tintin Daily News from June 5, 1989. An article in this newspaper stated that more than 10,000 people died in the massacre that CCP troops carried out on June 4, 1989. Another story on the front page of Tintin Daily News reported the brutality of the CCP's troops during the massacre. Wounded but not dead.
Shot one more time, still not breathing, thrown into the fire.
@Byron_Wan - Byron Wan
These young Chinese tourists claim they don’t know anything about June 4 or “Tiananmen Square”. https://t.co/Yz7KOpcGcs
@committeeonccp - Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party
Meet Xia Chaochuan. 35 years ago, her mother participated in the Tiananmen Square protest movement. In 2022, Xia joined the White Paper movement to protest the lockdown policies of the Chinese government. She was tortured and sexually harassed. Hear her message. 👇 https://t.co/bmwwdzT3o6
Video Transcript AI Summary
35 years ago, Tiananmen Square saw a brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters. Memories of the event are still vivid for many, highlighting the ongoing suppression of free speech in China. Recent protests against censorship led to arrests and torture of activists. The current regime is cracking down on civil society and committing atrocities against Uyghurs, Tibetans, and Hong Kongers. It is time to take action against these injustices and stand up for justice and humanity.
Translation: Memories of the Tiananmen Square massacre remain strong, reflecting ongoing suppression of free speech in China. Recent protests led to arrests and torture of activists. The regime is cracking down on civil society and committing atrocities against Uyghurs, Tibetans, and Hong Kongers. It is time to act against these injustices and stand up for justice and humanity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 35 years ago, Tiananmen Square became a slaughterhouse stacked with bodies of peaceful protesters, students, workers, journalists, and citizens. Their most simple wishes of nothing but the free and democratic China were drowned in blood. One summer, I returned home and asked my mother about 1989. To my surprise, she began to recall vivid memories of her days as a university student, joining local protests, putting on posters, and seeing her best friend taking a free train to Beijing. Till then I realized how June 4th was a collective memory of her generation and how he has become the elephant in the room now in China.
2 years ago, a nationwide protest broke up in China, named after the blank papers we held in our hands. A silent scream symbolizing our anger against the censorship. After the protest, I was criminally detained and thrown into solitary confinement with hundreds of peaceful protesters sharing my fate. I was tortured and sexually harassed and developed audio hallucinations within the single cell. Why are they afraid of candles, flowers, and blank papers?
Why are they afraid of people remembering their own history? Now the work with China regressing into a new culture revolution, weaponized with nationalism and patriarchal ideology, cracking down the remaining public space of civil society, arresting journalists and lawyers, and committing cultural genocide against Uyghurs, Tibetans, and Hong Kongers. Our families in China have hostages to force our loyalty to the party. As for Uyghurs, this will mean their families being sent to the so called reeducational camp. The dictator's hunger for power won't stop on its own.
The time for action is now. We must act decisively against the atrocities. Stand with us. Stand for justice and stand for humanity.
@Byron_Wan - Byron Wan
Those CCP shills and trolls denying the Tiananmen Square massacre should read this: the front page of 🇨🇳 state-owned Wen Wei Po on June 4, 1989… https://t.co/cCuXlKoKTu
@jenniferzeng97 - Inconvenient Truths by Jennifer Zeng
So far the most complete video of #Tankman in 1989. #Tiananmen #TiananmenMassacre https://t.co/eF2AMwSGGh
reSee.it AI Summary
On June 4th, 1989, the CCP brutally suppressed pro-democracy student protesters in Tiananmen Square. It serves as a reminder of the consequences of citizens being disarmed under a tyrannical government. This event should be acknowledged as a cautionary tale for any country, including America.
@XVanFleet - Xi Van Fleet
.@davidhogg111 Today is a perfect day for you to learn some real history! On June 4th 1989 the CCP massacred ten of thousand peaceful pro-democracy student protesters in Tiananmen Square! This is what happens when citizens are disarmed under a tyrannical government!!! And this can happen anywhere including America!!! @Lily4Liberty
@jenniferzeng97 - Inconvenient Truths by Jennifer Zeng
Xi & Peng’s Role in Tiananmen Massacre. First Disclosure: Real Death Tolls by Demographics & Regions https://t.co/yyyEjNr4dP
@Maga4liberty - Mark Lewis
This is the Video CNN does not want you to see! YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO! https://t.co/aKbbVcXHkz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The moderator of the upcoming debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump in Atlanta has compared Trump to Hitler, echoing Hitler's dehumanizing rhetoric. CNN has previously shown clips of Jake Tapper making similar comparisons. The network now faces criticism for having the same moderator who made these comparisons moderate the debate fairly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They don't want you to see that the moderator of the June 27th debate in Atlanta, Georgia between Joe Biden and Donald Trump is somebody who has compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler. They don't want you to see this. So what does that mean? That means we share the crap out of it. Watch.
Speaker 1: The dehumanizing rhetoric of Adolf Hitler is once again alive and well on a national political stage. This time, of course, in the United States. Trump, a couple times over the weekend, referred to, immigrants from South America, Africa, and Asia. He did not mention Europe. South America, Africa, and Asia as, quote, poisoning the blood of our country, which it's not hyperbole.
That does very directly echo, echo, Adolf Hitler's language, before World War 2. Open up a copy of Hitler's Mein Kampf, you would find the Nazi leader describing the of non Germans with Germans as poisoning. There's really no other way to say it. Donald Trump's language mirrors this directly.
Speaker 0: That's what CNN doesn't want you to see. They don't want you to see multiple clips, multiple instances of Jake Tapper comparing Donald John Trump to Adolf Hitler on their network. They're not ashamed that they shut down Caroline Levitt because she brought this up. They're ashamed of the fact that it's happened on their network before and now they're asking that guy who compared Donald Trump to Hitler to moderate a debate fairly and objectively. It's not gonna happen.
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
This happened 15 days ago, yet the entire thing is already being suppressed. Do. Not. Let. Them. Bury. This. https://t.co/9jM0gtEOcf
@XVanFleet - Xi Van Fleet
Tim Walz taught in CCP’s China between 1989 and 1990. What happened in 1989? It was the year of the bloody Tiananmen Square massacre which killed tens of thousands of peaceful protesters. That didn’t seem to dampen at all Walz’s admiration for the Chinese Communist regime. https://t.co/7RhohIGQDU
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Forward this video to friends & family to understand just how evil the government has been https://t.co/XgRnikMK6J
Video Transcript AI Summary
Debanking occurs when individuals or companies are removed from the banking system, often due to political reasons. For example, some right-leaning individuals and businesses, like those in the marijuana or crypto sectors, have faced debanking. This practice has intensified over the past 15 years, with the government exerting pressure on banks to deny services to certain political opponents or disfavored industries. Many tech founders and crypto entrepreneurs have been affected, leading to a significant number being debanked or facing legal threats. The SEC has also contributed to this by issuing Wells notices, which signal potential future charges, creating an environment of fear and uncertainty. Ultimately, this results in individuals resorting to cash transactions and other means to manage their finances, as they navigate a system lacking transparency and accountability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New in financial services. I need Can
Speaker 1: you give me an example?
Speaker 0: I guess, you know, debanking. This is where a lot of the debanking comes from is the is these agencies. So debanking is when you're you as either a person or your company are literally kicked out of the banking system.
Speaker 1: Like they did to Kanye.
Speaker 0: Exactly. Like they did to Kanye. My my my partner Ben's father, has been debanked. Really? We had an employee who For what?
We for having the wrong politics Oh. For for saying unacceptable things. Under current banking regulations under okay. Here's a great here's a great thing. Under current banking regulations, after all the reforms of the last 20 years, there's now a category called a politically exposed person, PEP.
And if you are a PEP, you are required by financial regulators to kick them off of your of to kick them out of your bank. You you you're not allowed to
Speaker 1: have politically on the left?
Speaker 0: Well, that that's fine. No. Because they're because they're not politically exposed.
Speaker 1: So no one on the left gets debanked?
Speaker 0: No. I have not heard of a single instance of anyone in the left getting debanked. Can you
Speaker 1: tell me what the person that you know did, what what they said that got them debanked?
Speaker 0: Oh, well, I mean, David Horowitz is a right wing. You know, he's pro Trump. I mean, he said all kinds of things. You know, he's been very anti Islamic terrorism. He's been very worried about immigration, all these things.
Speaker 1: And they debanked for the Yeah.
Speaker 0: They de banked it. So you get kicked out you get kicked out of your bank account. You get you get kicked out of the you can't do credit card transactions. But by the way, you can't How is that legal? Well, exactly.
So this is the thing. And so and then you go in this thing of, like, well, there's no this is where the government and the companies get intertwined back to your fascism point, which is, there's no there's a constitutional amendment that says the government can't restrict your speech, but there's no constitutional amendment that says the government can't de bank you. Right? And so they if they can't do the one thing, then they they do the other thing. And then they don't have to de bank you.
They just have to put pressure on on the private company banks to do it. And then the private company banks do it because they're expected to. But the government gets to say we didn't do it. It was the private company that did it. And, of course, JPMorgan can decide who they wanna have as customers, of course, right, because they're a private company.
And so it's this it's this sleight of hand that happens. So it's basically it's a privatized sanctions regime that lets bureaucrats do to American citizens the same thing that we do to Iran. Woah. Kick you out of the financial system. And so this has been happening to all the crypto entrepreneurs in the last 4 years.
This has been happening to a lot of the Fintech entrepreneurs, anybody trying to start any kind of new banking service, because they're trying to protect the big banks. And then this has been happening, by the way, also in legal fields of economic activity that they don't like. And so a lot of this started about 15 years ago with this thing called Operation Truck Point where they decided to, as marijuana started to become legal, as prostitution started to become legal and then guns which there's always a fight about. Under the Obama administration they started to de bank legal marijuana businesses, escrow businesses and then and then and then gun shops just like your gun manufacturers and just like you're done, you're out of the banking system. And so if you're running a medical marijuana dispensary in 2012, like you guess what?
You're doing your business all in cash because you literally can't get a bank account. You can't get a Visa terminal. You can't process transactions. You can't do payroll. You can't do direct deposit.
You can't get insurance. Like, none of that stuff is you've been sanctioned. Right? None of that stuff is available. And then this administration extended that concept to apply it to tech founders, crypto founders, and then just generally political opponents.
Yeah. Yeah. So that's that's been like super pernicious.
Speaker 1: I wasn't aware of that.
Speaker 0: Oh, 100%. And it's called so it's Operation Short Point 1.0 was 15 years ago against the pot and the guns. Short Point 2.0 is primarily against their political enemies and then to their disfavored tech startups. And it's hit the tech world. Like, we've hard we've had, like, 30 founders de banked in the last 4 years.
Real? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
It's been it's been a big recurring pattern. 30. This is one of the reasons why we ended up supporting Trump. It's like we just can't we can't live in this world. We can't live in a world where somebody starts a company that's a completely legal thing, and then they literally, like, get sanctioned.
Right? And embargoed by the United States government through a completely unaccountable no. By the way, no due process. None of this is written down. There's no rules.
There's no court. There's no decision process. There's no appeal. Who do you appeal to? Right?
Like, who do you go to to get your bank account back? Right? You know, and then and then, you know, and then there's there's this and then there's also the civil asset forfeiture side of it, which is right the other side. And that doesn't happen to us, but that happens to people in a lot of places now who get arrested and all of a sudden, you know, the state takes their money.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So that happens to people if they get pulled over and they have a large amount of cash in some states. Right.
Speaker 0: Or, you know, there'll be there'll be, you know, well publicized examples of, like, you know, there was, like, you know, there'll be some investigation into, like, you know, safe deposit boxes. And the next thing you know, the the the feds have seized all this all the contents of the state deposit Right. Safe deposit boxes and that that stuff never gets returned. And so it's it's this and this is when, you know, this is when Trump says the deep state, you know, I like the way we would describe it as it's it's administrative power. It's it's political power being administered, not through legislation.
Right? So there's no defined law that covers this. It's not through regulation. Right? There's nothing you can you can't go sue a regulator to fix this.
It's not through any kind of court judgment. It's just raw power. It's just raw administrative power. It's the government or politicians just deciding that things are going to be a certain way, and then they just apply pressure until they get it.
Speaker 1: So what happens to those 30 tech people that you know that
Speaker 0: To to go into a different field, like, try to do something different and try to Woah. Try to try to get, you know
Speaker 1: Complete upending of your life.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Complete upending of your life and try to try to, yeah, try to change your try to get out of try to get away from the eye of Sauron. Try to get out of whatever zone got you into this and keep applying for new bank accounts at different banks and hope that at some point, a bank will say, you know, oh, okay. You know, it's okay. We've checked in.
It's now alright.
Speaker 1: Woah. But there's no So what do they do with their money? Like, what happens? Yeah.
Speaker 0: I mean, you go to cash. I mean
Speaker 1: You go to cash?
Speaker 0: You can't have a yeah. Do you So where do you put it? I don't I don't under your mattress. Under your mattress. Yes.
Exactly. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Exactly. So insane. So if someone has $30,000,000 in the bank and they get debanked.
Speaker 0: Diamonds, art, you know, do you, I don't know, go overseas somewhere.
Speaker 1: Holy shit.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It just, like, it just it just happens. And and, again, it's really, really important.
There's no fingerprints. Like, there's no Right.
Speaker 1: There's no person who There's no stick above the strings.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly. Right. It just happened. And and we can trace it back as we understand exactly you know, we we know we know the we know the politicians involved, and we know how the agencies work, and we know how the pressure is applied.
And we know that these banks get phone calls and so forth. And so we can loosely like we understand the flow of power as it happens. But when you're on the receiving end of this, your specific instance of it, like you can't trace it back and there's nothing you can
Speaker 1: do with that. So these what are the instances? Like what is the company? What are they trying to do and how do they run a file? Well, all
Speaker 0: the crypto startups in the last basically 4 years. So remember the crypto crypto thing got, like, really, you know, sort of everybody got excited and, like, NFTs and, like, all that stuff, and then it just, like, stopped.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And the reason it stopped is because basically every crypto founder, every crypto startup, they either got debanked personally and forced out of the industry, or their company got debanked and so it couldn't keep operating, or they got prosecuted, charged, or they got threatened with being charged. This is a fun this is a fun twist. It's a fun little twist. The the s so the SEC sort of has been trying to kill the crypto industry under under Biden. And this has been a big issue issue for us because we're we're the biggest crypto crypto startup investor.
The SEC can they can investigate you. They can subpoena you. They can prosecute you. They can do all these things. But they don't have to do any of those things to really damage you.
All they have to do is they issue what's called a Wells notice. And the Wells notice is a notification that you may be charged at some point in the future. Like you're like on notice that you might be doing something wrong and they might be coming after you at some point in the future.
Speaker 2: Oh my god.
Speaker 0: Okay. So terrifying.
Speaker 1: That's the eye.
Speaker 0: The eye of Sauron is on you. Okay. Now trying to be a company with a Wells notice doing business with anybody else.
Speaker 3: Oh my god. Right?
Speaker 0: Try to try to work with a big company, try to get access to a bank, try try to do anything.
Speaker 1: When they support DEI initiatives and they yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, then the s the SEC under Biden became a the SEC under Biden became a direct application of exactly. So DEI, they started they did a lot with that and then ESG all the ESG stuff. And ESG is a very malleable concept, and they piled all kinds of new requirements into that. So through that through this process, the SEC could basically just simply dictate what companies do with no accountability at all. Like, there's no, you know, there's no over there's no over there.
There are hearings where they get yelled at, but, like, nothing changed. Nothing ever happened in a hearing that ever changed anything. It's just the raw application of power. Right. And so This is your friends.
Speaker 1: This has happened to.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. For sure. Yeah. And we had like I said, we had an employee who got D Bank because he had crypto in his job title. He was he was doing crypto policy for us, and his bank booted him, because he That's it.
Because they did they did they did a screen across it's what they told us is they did a screen across their their customer base. And anyone with crypto. Because because anybody with crypto became a politically exposed person. Because wow.
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
Graphic content warning. https://t.co/uLrfbfeXmK
Video Transcript AI Summary
What I'm about to show you is horrific. Not a single Gazan "refugee" should be allowed in Britain. If we let these Palestinians in, there will be dead bodies. Hamas dug up and paraded coffins carrying the bodies of Jewish babies and their mother and the Palestinians cheered. They celebrated the murder of Jewish babies. Fathers took their children to watch the coffins go by. Hamas locked the coffins, and Israel had to screen them for explosives.
How did Hamas get the resources for giant posters? The Hamas fighters seem well-fed. As coffins were paraded, Jeremy Corbyn tweeted, "No more arms to Israel," while 15 Labour MPs demand we let Palestinians seek asylum in Britain. Immigration judges rule Gazans can use the Ukrainian refugee scheme to come to Britain. I think the majority in Gaza and of Palestinians support Hamas and the slaughter of Jews. That was the next generation of Islamist terrorists. Which of these monsters will Labour MPs and immigration judges be moving into their own homes?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I'm about to show you contains powerful pictures, powerful videos, and it is quite simply one of the worst things I have ever seen in my life. And if you're anything like me, you will struggle to put into words your emotions at seeing what I'm about to show you. But I have done my best. Not a single Gazan so called refugee should ever set foot in Britain. I'd say over my dead body, but I'm convinced that if we do let these Palestinians in, then there will be a lot of dead bodies.
Why? Just look at this. Today, Hamas dug up and paraded the coffins carrying the bodies of Jewish babies and their mother. How did these poor, oppressed, lovely Palestinians react? Those barbarians cheered.
They celebrated the fact that Hamas murdered Jewish babies. And look at this. They came out to line the streets to watch those coffins go by, celebrating again. Fathers took their own children in their arms to gleefully watch as dead Jewish children were returned to Israel. But they weren't just returned.
No. The Sun has reported that Hamas locked the coffins and didn't provide the keys. Israel had to screen those coffins to make sure Hamas hadn't packed them with explosives. All this talk about how Gaza is impoverished and locked off from the outside world. Well, where did Hamas get the resources to make these horrific giant posters?
How did they manage to get them printed, to design them, to get them there? And I'll be honest with you, all those Hamas fighters, they seem very well fed, don't they? They don't look like they've been having any trouble whatsoever getting food. As videos emerged of those coffins being paraded through the streets, Jeremy Corbyn, the man that our current prime minister, Keir Starmer, tried to get elected not once but twice, tweeted this. No more arms to Israel.
Stop arming Israel. Nothing about Hamas. Nothing at all. And now 15 Labour MPs have written to Kierst Dahmer demanding that we let Palestinians seek asylum in Britain. Oh, these poor oppressed people, they face the daily risk of death.
They've got no medical supplies. They've got no way out. Alright then. And we've got immigration judges like Hugo, Benedict, Norton, Taylor, ruling that Gazans can use the Ukrainian refugee scheme to come to Britain. Just just look at this.
Just look at this. There's your refugees, are they? I'll just say it. I think the majority of people in Gaza support Hamas. I think the majority of Palestinians support Hamas.
I think they support the slaughter of Jews. I think what you just saw there was the next generation of Islamist terrorists. And those labor MPs, that immigration judge, just look at this picture here. Okay? Again, just look at those pictures there, that imagery.
Are these poor desperate Palestinians? They look like Hamas supporters to me, don't they? And I want the Labour MPs and immigration judge Hugo Benedict Norton Taylor to tell me right now which one of those monsters they will be moving in to their own homes.
@visegrad24 - Visegrád 24
Video of Chinese communist security forces killing hundreds of protesting students on the Tiananmen Square in Beijing on June 4th, 1989 🇨🇳 https://t.co/H2dLU4jNF7