reSee.it - Related Post Feed

DecentFiJC
Posted - May 20, 2023 at 10:40 PM
Saved - May 24, 2023 at 4:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a shocking revelation, it appears that Maricopa County's election records were shared with non-US entities, including the Chilean Government and UN Women. Cindy McCain, a high-ranking official, is involved in these connections. Furthermore, Senate candidate Mark Kelly has ties to the UN and the Rockefellers. Suspicious access was granted to these groups, raising questions about the integrity of the November 2022 election results. The involvement of various individuals and organizations, along with irregularities in ballot IDs, points to potential misconduct. These findings demand further investigation and raise concerns about the credibility of the election process.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

In today’s episode of “How Cloudflare Works™️” — We now officially know what they meant when they said “Kari lost the election because she pissed off McCain voters”. They meant “UN globalists” and “those seeking to corner the markets in oil, natural gas, water and energy.” So…

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

On or before October 3, 2022, Maricopa County’s elections data (http://elections.Maricopa.gov) was made available to 3 different domains, with Cloudflare and Rackspace being 2 of them. Nothing too out of the ordinary. The last domain belongs to “http://directemar.cl” — so who are they?🤔 As it turns out, http://Directemar.cl is the Chilean Government, which is closely involved with UN Women and Agenda 2030-based “Sustainability Development Goals”. They even have a UN Women Liaison Office on Connecticut Avenue in Washington, DC.🤣 (Cindy McCain lol) So what does this all mean? It means Maricopa’s elections records were included in OUTGOING data shares to a non-US entity in which Cindy McCain herself is a high-ranking official. 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 (Senate candidate, Mark Kelly is also closely involved with both the UN and the Rockefellers.) http://elections.Maricopa.gov) http://directemar.cl”

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥Other records of interest during that time included: -prontus-clipping.directemar.cl -CBRE.lu.cdn🤔 -qa-au-4bz-fixabp-567-REVERTRECENTCHANGES.AZ.ssdgws.co.UK🤔 James Breeze, CBRE’s VP, Global Head of Industrial & Logistics Research lives right there in Phoenix, AZ. Some really interesting follows for such an important executive with a smaller-sized Twitter account.😏

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

NOTEWORTHY — all GPS coordinates traced back to these 2 locations: -a SF private residence Felisa V Cortez 339 Connecticut Street, San Francisco, CA 94107 (37.7621, -122.3971) -Akpinar, a small town within Turkey’s Central Anatolia region. (37.751, 37.751)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Then, on or before November 18, 2022, further potential access to Maricopa elections records was again granted to 2 new domains — -The Ritz-Carlton Residences, Portland, OR -Berkley Oil & Gas, Houston, TX Berkley is a Houston-based energy insurance company that specializes in risk mitigation for cutting-edge energy producers. Both of these new domains were still represented by the same GPS coordinates from before.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

3 days later, on November 21, 2022, Maricopa would release its “Final Official Results” from the November 8 General Elections. 💥Now it gets bad. REAL f’ing bad.🤬 If you’ll remember, Kori Lorick, AZ’s Director of Elections didn’t release her own official “Declaration” of the elections results until December 19, 2022, almost a full month later. So what took so long?🤔 Buckle. Up.👀 Sometime on or before December 13, 2022, “somebody” appears to have granted “GOD MODE” access to these same groups. Just take a second and look at all the PERMISSIONS GRANTED to users.🫢 Holy. Shit.🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 💥NOTEWORTHY — I say “somebody” very tongue-in-cheek here. But we can see whose fingerprints are all over it… SEVERAL TIMES.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 (Maricopa Recorder)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

As you might can guess, we have more coming on this front. A LOT more. SPOILERS — This was still happening as of this past week, DURING KARI’S TRIAL.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 The November 2022 election results simply cannot be taken seriously at this point.🤦🏻‍♂️ Subpoenas. Warrants. Arrests. Etc.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Pro Tip — I don’t recommend doing this.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

No. We haven’t even gotten to that part yet. https://t.co/38SC1YHXsp

@knpk1955 - KNK

@DecentFiJC So was this reconfiguration the one you mention happening during the trial?

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

🤣 Imagine that.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Heads up, folks.🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 You’ll wanna save this tweet and the embedded images within it to cold storage at once. Thank you, kindly.🙏🏼 Spoiler alert — We’ll be subpoenaing every single CF RAY ID from our report in the immediate future.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Now comes the REALLY FUN part — May 12, 2023 and May 17, 2023. Oh, look — There’s http://directemar.cl again! JUST AS KARI’S TRIAL IS GETTING UNDERWAY. Imagine that. Gosh, what are the chances?🤣

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Btw, just in case you haven’t already saved the CF RAY ID for the October 3, 2022 terminal… Here’s that one too.😏

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

This is the appropriate energy here. https://t.co/APXAIihpgg

@Nameitwhat - HQ

Checkmate ♟️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the potential consequences of tweets hurting a company's reputation and advertisers pulling out. They reference a scene from The Princess Bride and emphasize the importance of speaking their minds, even if it means losing money. The conversation then shifts to a character named Yenigo Montoya seeking revenge for his father's murder. Yenigo shares his backstory and his determination to confront the killer. The video concludes with a comparison to a chess game, where one player is in checkmate and the outcome is inevitable. The speakers acknowledge the humor in the situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I'm what I'm trying even came up though in the annual meeting. I mean, you know, do your tweets hurt the company? Are there Tesla owners who say, I don't agree with his political position because and I know it because he shares so much of it? Speaker 1: Or are there advertisers on Twitter that Linda Yacarina will come and say, you gotta stop, and, or, you know, I can't get these ads because of some of the things you tweet. You know, I'm reminded of, the the scene in The Princess Bride. Great movie. Great movie. Where he confronts the person who killed his father. And he says, I don't care. So you just don't care. Speaker 0: You wanna share what you have to say? Speaker 1: I'll say what I wanna say. And if if if, if the consequence of that is losing money, so be Speaker 2: it. Okay. Speaker 3: I promise I will not kill you until you reach the top. That's very comforting, Speaker 2: but I'm afraid you'll just Have to wait. I hate it. Speaker 3: I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. Is there any way you'll trust me? Nothing comes to mind. I swear on the soul of my father, Domingo Montoya. You will reach the top alive. Throw me the rope. Speaker 2: Thank you. Well, Speaker 3: wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Don't tell you already. Speaker 4: Again, thank Speaker 5: you. Speaker 3: I do not mean to pry, But you don't, by any chance, happen to have 6 fingers on your right hand? Speaker 2: Do you always begin conversations this way? Speaker 3: My father was slaughtered by a 6 fingered man. Was a great sword like my When the 6 fingered man appear and request a special sword, my father took the job. He's never here before he was done. I've never seen a sequel. Six fingered man returned and demanded it, but at 1 tenth his promised price, my father refused. Without a word, the 6 fingered man slashing through the heart. I love my father, so naturally, I challenge his murderer to a duel. My file. 6 fingered man lived me alive, But he gave me this. How old were you? I was 11 years old. When I was strong enough, I dedicated my life to the study of fencing. So the next time we meet, I will not fail. I will go up to the 6 fingered man and say, Hello. My name is Yenigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die. You've done nothing but study swordplay? We're pursuing in a study later. Speaker 4: You see, I cannot find it. Speaker 3: It's been 20 years now I started to lose confidence. I just work for Faustina to pay the bills. It's not a lot of money in revenge. Speaker 2: Will I? I certainly hope you find him someday. Speaker 3: You're ready then. Whether I am or not, Speaker 2: you've been more than fat. Speaker 3: You seem a decent fellow. I hate to kill you. Speaker 2: You seem a decent fellow. I hate to die. Good heavens. Are you still trying to win? Speaker 3: You've You've Speaker 2: got an overdeveloped sense of vengeance. It's going to get you into trouble someday. Speaker 3: Hello. My name is. You killed my father. Prepare to die. My name is Diego Montoya. You kill my father. Prepare to die. Speaker 4: Hello. My name is Diego Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die. Stop saying that. Hello. My name is Eligio Montoya. You killed my father. Repent design. No. Speaker 3: Offer me money. Speaker 4: Yes. Power 2 promise me I can all that I have and more. Please offer me everything I ask for, anything you want. Speaker 3: I want my father back, Speaker 5: Basically, what we're experiencing right now is 2 master chess players sitting at the board, and One of them looks down at the board and sees that he's in checkmate in 7 moves. And he looks across to his opponent and he knows that his opponent sees it too, so there's no getting out of it. So at this point, The loser can only prolong the game. Both players know the game is over. It's only a matter of time before he does this, And then you're forced to do this, and then he's forced to do this. And eventually, checkmate. Based on the rules of the game, The bad guys have already lost. The good guys have already won. Yes. There's moves left on the table. But those moves are being forced By the player that is going to win. The only way that Checkmate can't happen is if The player that's winning makes a mistake. It seems pretty obvious that The good guy player on the side of the chessboard knows exactly what has to be done to win the game. And so at this point, any mistake would be all but impossible. And I'm sure most people sitting watching a chess match between 2 advanced chess players No. The game's over long after the 2 players know it's over Because they can't see the board and see that there's only 7 moves left. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: He's hilarious, Extremely funny. Loves puns. Speaker 1: I mean, this is I feel like there's a comedy situation here. Speaker 3: That's good.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Life, uhm… uhhh… comes at you fast.👀 https://t.co/xrT7M7LGE3

@Sunchasegirl - Sunchaser

@DecentFiJC 😆 🤣 😂 😹

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

That probably also explains this weird, totally-not-suspicious exchange I had with (Kari Lake hater) “Dr.” Andrew Jackson, recently. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/JhS7MIrJXN

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@DrAndrewJackson, Do you receive income or any other benefits (or have expectations of future benefits) from anyone with ties to Israel or Turkey? You’ll want to answer honestly. Thanks. https://t.co/O00eSZIj5m

@DrAndrewJackson - Dr. Andrew Jackson

Katie Hobbs is Arizona's Governor for one primary reason: some Republicans think it is righteous to call people names and divide conservatives (Republicans and Independents) into conflicting camps. Unity, not division, is a conservative principle.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Pro Tip — You’ll wanna save every anti-Lake tweet this guy has made in the past 3 months. Also makes sure to dig up that tweet he randomly made weeks back where, after a few days worth of solid anti-KL takes, he randomly Twerts “I will now be spending the next 2 months in Israel…

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Here’s May 11, 2023 too.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Hey, speaking of Rackspace — It appears Michael Saleem of Rackspace had recent access on May 11, 2023 as well. (Solely to “fortify” our elections critical infrastructure and save “OurDemocracy™️”, I’m sure.) Took a quick look at his LinkedIn profile and noticed his PCNSE credentials seem to have expired back in December of 2022.😳 Gosh, that’s so weird. I’m sure Maricopa County would NEVER have an unlicensed NSE directly involved with securing our elections critical infrastructure networks. Perhaps he just never updated his page to reflect his updated credentials.😏 You know, democracy and quality candidates and whatnot.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Lots of neat script language and RAY IDs to probably go ahead and save to cold storage here.🤣 Lol, “http://elections.Maricopa.gov needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding” is pretty f’ing legendary as well.🤣🤣🤣 That’ll be a bit devastating to any hopes they had of pleading negligence or an accidental error in oversight. (just a total yikes everywhere you look🤣) http://elections.Maricopa.gov

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Wait, you’re telling me Ray Epps is LDS too?😨 Does that mean his new attorney (Michael Teter) that’s tied to the 65 Project and David Brock is also likely LDS?🤔 https://t.co/0bCcKnkaTm

@GG5349858543 - GG53

LDS Ray Epps and now Jeff Flake??? @RepAndyBiggsAZ what is going on? https://t.co/KzQ75ZaLeS

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Here’s May 11, 2023 too.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Hey, ‘member how I talked about algorithms they were using in Maricopa? Yeah, this is pretty hilarious, considering what we were told vs what we now know.🤣 💥12,940 total ballot types in Maricopa. 💥4,312 ballot types used on Election Day in-person voting in Maricopa County, across 223 vote centers. 💥NARRATOR — Ballot ID #255457 must’ve been a popular ballot on Election Day, seeing as how it showed up 21 times in just the first 101 “Cast” votes, per the CVR (20.79%). Gosh, what are the chances?🤣

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Btw, #255457 showed up another 10 times in the next 40 cast ballots, bringing its total frequency all the way up to being 31 of the first 141 ballots recorded in the CVR (21.98%).🤣🤣🤣 Other popular ballot IDs from a small sample were #258589 and #262915. You can see their frequencies below as well. (lmao even)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥ALSO NOTEWORTHY — 2 of the first 75 ballots cast (#72 and #75) according to the files showed error messages which read: “Ballot ID not present in database”. ID# 259209 (#72) ID #252063 (#75) Then you check the CVR for the Ballot IDs to be used in-person on Election Day and you notice a “Count 2; Lose 4” pattern in the numeric sequence. What you won’t find, is either of those two ballot IDs from the error message mentioned above. They both fell into the “Lose 4” portion of the numeric sequence. 💥But notice, ballot #72 (ID# 259209, originally) was rescanned with a different ballot ID# (259208) and was then successfully “Cast”, according to the CVR. Why is that, you ask?🤔 Because that Ballot ID fell into the “Count 2” side of the sequential numeric pattern. 💥So, the question becomes — WHY WERE THOSE BALLOTS EVER EVEN PRINTED ON ELECTION DAY TO BEGIN WITH?!?!🤬🤬🤬 (we know why) Oh, BTW… Right after ballot #75 failed, ballots #76-78 were “skipped”, then backed out. #75 and #76 were given seemingly random Ballot IDs and then cast. And that’s when our favorite Ballot ID (#255457) showed back up again and rolled a TURKEY on us (3-in-a-row), to also be counted as ballots #77-79 in the CVR.🤣

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

🤣 (These people are amateur hour crooks across the board. My God.)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

That’s not what’s happening here — the ballot ID# represents one type out of the (allegedly) 4,312 different types of ballots being used for in-person voting on Election Day in Maricopa. They were at LEAST smart enough not to just make photocopies of the same ballots repeatedly. But barely.🤣 https://t.co/UCnQuYzEY6

@isay_who - Dark2Light

Arizona same ballots counted multiple times. Got caught https://t.co/RH434GAhLX

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Btw, #255457 showed up another 10 times in the next 40 cast ballots, bringing its total frequency all the way up to being 31 of the first 141 ballots recorded in the CVR (21.98%).🤣🤣🤣 Other popular ballot IDs from a small sample were #258589 and #262915. You can see their…

akafacehots
Posted - October 26, 2023 at 3:14 AM
Saved - October 28, 2023 at 11:27 AM

@akafacehots - aka

Here's a few hundred of the thousands of duplicate ballots that were double and triple scanned in Fulton. https://t.co/XFyS9iVJDF

Rasmussen_Poll
Posted - October 28, 2023 at 11:55 AM
Saved - October 29, 2023 at 3:10 AM

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"I would watch the ballots go by, and there were odd patterns. 7 of those ballots were for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump. That clearly doesn't .. that's not statistically possible." (Fake ballots were found) - https://uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/

Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. uncoverdc.com
Real_RobN
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 4:23 PM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 6:39 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Election deniers, conspiracy theorists and J6 political prisoners listen up, Here’s how Fani Willis was duplicated at Fulton County into DA on Nov 3. 2020. “Each one of them even has this little dot in the Fani Willis” “So there you have it ENTIRE batches scanned several times” https://t.co/NYBDJyd96q

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are two batches of votes being examined. The speaker points out that there are identical markings on different ballots, suggesting duplication. They show examples of the same markings and even a dot in the same spot. The speaker mentions having a total of 62 images, but didn't go through all of them. The numbers of the batches are not remembered, but it is clear that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Looking at here are, are 2 different batches of votes. Scanner 5162, batch 2 30 4, image 59, and scanner 5162, batch 2/35, image 19. And what you can see is that, like on this boat right here, we've got this exact same little tail that shows on both of them. And if you don't and if you think that maybe that's, you know, if you think that maybe that's just a, you know, a mistake or or or, You know, or just a coincidence. Here's the next one that shows you can see Republican as written there. Republicans written there. Fitness. This is, ballot 61. This is ballot number 2. And then, each one of them even has this little dot in the Fannie Willis. Speaker 1: Okay. And do you have more of those? Speaker 0: We have the entire batch. I've got there's 62 images in here total and I didn't even get a chance figure through all of them, but these are the most obvious ones where it's clear that it's it's the same. This one's got the little tail on the side. Speaker 1: And so what happened so do you know the numbers of these total batches? Like Speaker 0: I don't remember what the what the totals were on the batches. I I don't think they were they weren't disparate. They were fairly close, but the the simple fact that they Speaker 1: occurred see that little bubble right there. This is a one image. Here's another image. Speaker 0: Exactly. Speaker 1: See, the exact Image Speaker 0: number 92. Matches, image number 92, matches the same scanner, 5162, batch 2 30 4, image 33. Speaker 1: So there you have it. Duplicate ballots. The entire batch is scanned several times.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 8, 2023 at 10:47 PM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 1:09 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here is how Katie Hobbs via Maricopa County plotted the 2022 Insurrection. 25+ year cyber security expert under oath: Based on Maricopa County own Insurrection officials admission they used 19-inch ballots on 20-inch paper produced by RUNBECK that caused the tabulator rejection. https://t.co/T8CejB663z

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they heard Mr. Jared testify about a 20-inch ballot being used in the November 2022 general election. Speaker 1 confirms that they did. Speaker 0 then asks if a 19-inch ballot image projected on a 20-inch piece of paper, used in the Maricopa election, would be rejected when placed into a vote center tabulator. Speaker 1 responds that it would indeed be rejected.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've heard previous testimony. Were you here for mister Jared's testimony? Yes, sir. I was. And did you hear mister Jared testify that in the November 2022 general election, a 20 inch ballot was used? Speaker 1: Yes, sir. I did. Speaker 0: Would a 19 inch ballot image projected on a 20 inch piece of paper used in the election in Maricopa for November 2022, have when it was placed into one of these vote center tabulator. Speaker 1: It would cause it to be rejected.
veryvirology
Posted - December 9, 2023 at 5:58 PM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 10:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2020 election in Arizona has been a subject of controversy. Claims of stolen ballots, duplicate votes, and manipulated voter rolls have emerged. Allegations include the lack of unique identification numbers on duplicated ballots, a surge of duplicate votes after the polls closed, and the certification of the election without proper chain of custody. Additionally, concerns have been raised about deleted files from the server and the centralized control of voter records. These allegations highlight the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process.

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Remind me. Exactly how was the 2020 election stolen in Arizona? Throw it all at me. Fact, conspiracy theory, rumors that were ostensibly proven false. I'm looking for something, but I don't know what. Help right now will go a long way.

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

“HUNDREDS of log books” - recording every anomaly of Maricopa County Arizona’s 200,000+ non-conforming (counterfeit) 2020 election ballots. Biden ‘won’ the state by less than 12,000 ‘votes.’ Time to roll out the log books…

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here’s how the Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs stole 2 elections and covered it up. “Batch after batch after batch of ballots sent to duplication. But there is no unique serial number or identification number on the ballot had to be duplicated.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are concerns about duplicate ballots in the audit. The count should be 3 lower due to duplicates, but they are not accounted for. Logan explains that duplicate ballots are created when the original is damaged and cannot be processed. Each duplicate should have a 6-digit serial number matching the original, but they cannot find the corresponding originals. They have found duplicate ballots with a unique identifier, but no matching serial number on the original. This creates difficulty in matching duplicated ballots with their originals. The concern is that the numbers do not add up and the reality does not match the sheets.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You'll notice that there's 3 that are duplicates. So while the count in here, we'd expect it to be 3 lower, than than what the total count was because they're taken out for duplicates. For the example that they gave us, there's nothing listed. And so our understanding, if this form is filled out properly, the duplicate should be referenced in here, and we're not finding that be the case. And our numbers across the board showed that. We we took into account duplicates in the information that we gave, and it wasn't explained. So I'm still uncertain as to why these boxes are off and these these sheets do not match the reality of what we're running into. Speaker 1: Logan said that duplicate ballots are created when the original ballot is damaged and can't be run through the system. According to the former Secretary of State and current audit director, Ken Bennett, each duplicate ballot must have a 6 digit serial number printed on it That matches a 6 digit serial number printed on the original damaged ballot that it corresponds to. However, Bennett said they can't find the original ballots that match up To the duplicated ballots. Speaker 2: We are finding a 6 digit unique identifier, serial number. It says in 16/6/21 on the duplicate ballots, but we're not finding a corresponding serial number on the Original ballot that was damaged or otherwise had to be duplicated. In fact, I I was so surprised that I, brought the The 2 observers from the Secretary of State's office over, along with some other volunteer observers from various parties, just to kind of document that We're running into, batch after batch after batch of ballots sent to duplication, but there's no unique Serial number or identification number on the ballot that had to be duplicated that should correspond with a ballot over in the has been duplicated box. Speaker 1: Bennett said those should match up 1 for 1, and they should match up to the total number of ballots as a whole. Speaker 2: We are Struggling as to how we're going to be able to match up ballots sent to be duplicated with the ballots that were duplicated If one of those, the originals, are missing that 6 digit

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here’s Katie Hobbs to Maricopa County, How many ballots is needed? Between Nov 4th and Nov 9th a massive surge of duplicate Bidens received AFTER polls closed on Insurrection Day 2020, “25-30%” of all double votes received after election eventually counted in the Insurrection.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker discusses a comparison between two things. They mention that there has been a 25% increase in duplicates in the past 6 days, specifically between November 4th and 9th. They also mention that they found some interesting information through further analysis.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Versus what we have. And what we're also gonna see shortly is that we're gonna see that we also saw through further analysis the 25% surge of duplicates in the last 6 days between, November 4th to 9th. We also saw some very interesting

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is the Insurrection of Nov 2020 Maricopa County executed and McConnell certified with NO CHAIN OF CUSTODY. 95% of [Military…] towards a candidate who won by 10,000 votes that’s 8,000 new votes where people brought home because of a pandemic compared to 2016 of 1600.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was responsible for the traffic forensic portion of the audit and the quality control of the ballots. I handled damaged, large print, braille, and special ballots, including the UOCAVA ballots for overseas voters. These ballots are actually just regular 8.5 by 11 white sheets of copy paper. In 2016, there were 1,600 UOCAVA ballots, but in 2020, there were nearly 9,600. As an eyewitness, I can say that 95% of these ballots went to one candidate. This resulted in a net gain of 8,000 votes for that candidate, who won the state by just over 10,000 votes. This increase in UOCAVA ballots was due to the pandemic and the return of military personnel.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Traffic forensic portion of the audit and was the floor manager for the last few weeks of quality control. I was there when the last pallet at the auditorium left. My name is on the chain of custody forms of hundreds of thousands of ballots. So because of the accuracy seeing efficiency in my teams, we were tasked with tallying of the damaged ballots, large print ballots, braille ballots, and the special ballots set aside by the Senate. I specifically had the Senate liaison, the Secretary of State observers, and John Branke at my tables every day multiple times a day. But specifically, I was tasked with doing the UOCAVA ballots. A UOCAVA ballot is the Uniform Overseas Civilian Absentee Voting Act ballot. That ballot is sent out to our men and women who work overseas and for our federal people that work overseas to get a chance to vote in the elections. 2 seconds. This is what a ballot looks like that goes out to everybody, right? 11 half by 19 ballot. When I opened up the boxes of ballots, this is what a ballot looks like, that's a UOCAVA ballot. Do you know what that is? That's an 8a half by 11 white sheet of copy paper. Did you all know that our ballots come back like this from our overseas people? Did any of you know this? It was such a sham that I had people every day at my table's counting the picture taking pictures of these ballots that were scanned down. The ballots are scanned. It took my teens 3 complete days to count all of the UOCAVA ballots. You know why? Because in 2016, the numbers were apparently there were 1600 UOCAVA ballots that came back in the most significant election of our lifetime. In 2020, the numbers were close to 9,600 ballots came back. And I will tell you as an eyewitness as an eyewitness, 95%, because I was asked to tally these personally by the Senate liaisons all went towards 1 candidate. And in a state where this that candidate won by a little over 10,000 votes, That is a net gain of 8,000 new votes during an election when people were brought home, because there was a pandemic And because our federal people, our our our our military people, were brought home
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the low number of guardsmen deployed and the lack of active duty personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq. They mention voting absentee in the past and not trusting the postal service. The speaker questions the significance of the 9,800 guardsmen currently deployed compared to the 16,600 in 2016. They emphasize the need to investigate these issues. Additionally, they raise doubts about the authenticity and chain of custody of the ballots. The other speaker agrees with their point.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what this is what, I'm I'm having a difficult time with. We don't have that many guardsmen deployed. We don't have that many, and that was, we're talking about the winding down of Afghanistan, and almost a skeleton crew in Iraq of active duty deployed. When I was in the Marines, I voted absentee, I actually had a ballot, I never heard of this vote by email. Well, you had Speaker 1: a ballot, but you sent it in somehow. Speaker 0: Yeah. And of course, I'm convinced none of my absentee ballots ever made it in because I don't trust the postman. Okay. Anyway, but, especially if you're on ship. There's no there really is no male buoy out there that everybody is anyway. But I'm having a hard time grasping this 9, what, 9800? Speaker 1: 9600 plus, yes. Close to 10,000. Speaker 0: In what? In 2016, we had what? Speaker 1: A little over 16,600. Speaker 0: Which might make more sense. Our entire guard It's not even that many people, and we don't have anybody deployed. This is yeah. Okay. These are things that really need to be looked at. And then once again, we don't have no way of knowing that, that piece of paper that you pulled out of the boxes was a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy. So really, realistically, the chain of custody on that is kind of like out the door? Speaker 1: Correct.

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here’s how long the 2020 Insurrection took in Maricopa County Mitch McConnell certified in a rush. So, there were trucks of Robert L. Peters coming in on the 3rd, on the 4th, on the 5th, on the 6th, on the 7th, on the 8th, on the 9th and then on the 10th, and …

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trucks from a company called Runbeck were continuously delivering ballots for several days. The speaker is unsure of the exact duration but mentions that they were still coming in on their last day, which was the 10th. Runbeck is a high-speed scanning company that handles the scanning and printing of duplications, possibly including military ballots. The speaker is uncertain about the purpose of scanning the ballots off-site and whether they were printed or scanned. They mention that the high-speed scanning happens at Runbeck and that there were no observers present. The speaker also raises questions about the origin of the ballots and suggests asking county employees for clarification.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Yeah. Okay. Dude, just a minute. I'm I wanna make sure that we capture this properly. So there were trucks that showed up on 3rd, and then the 4th and then the 5th and How long did that go? How many days? I wasn't Speaker 1: there the whole last week, but Speaker 0: I know as long as you can recall how many days? Speaker 1: My last day was 10th and they were still coming in. Coming from a company called Runbeck that does the high speed scanning and Printing of duplications and I think the military ballots. And now I'm getting I'm getting out of my comfort level here talking about this. I don't know what they're doing, but those ballots were coming in from a high speed scanning company called Runbeck that Apparently, you haven't heard of Runbeck? Speaker 0: No, I've heard a run back, ma'am. What I'm trying to figure out is whether they printed them or they scanned them. And if they scanned them off-site, To what purpose? Speaker 1: I I can't tell Speaker 0: you that. Because wasn't that your job to scan them? Speaker 1: Well, Speaker 0: I I think not your job, but Speaker 1: Yeah, no, no. All the high speed scanning happens at Runbeck So those ballots go to Runbeck As far as I know, there were no observers there I don't know I never got called to work at Rembeck I guess all I can tell you Speaker 0: Okay, with all due Mr. Cook, now we've opened up a whole new can of worms. Speaker 1: Yeah. And again, we don't know enough about it to be the witness. Speaker 0: No, that's fine. I just Your observation is useful here. So what you're telling me I'm going to play this back to you in a second. The scanning wasn't actually done on-site at a Maricopa County structure. It was done someplace else. Speaker 1: Where they have very high speed scanners. Yeah. Speaker 0: Well, I right now, I really don't care what Speed is up. I wanna know, were they Dominion Scanners? Or they were No. Speaker 1: No. I don't think they're I don't think it has anything to do with Dominion. Speaker 0: So I'm trying to understand What was the purpose of scanning them in advance of them being tabulated on the Dominion equipment? Speaker 1: They were duplicate duplications, The ballots that wouldn't read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from military and overseas. But there were more ballots than that. So I don't know where the rest of them were coming from because they kept bringing trays of them in. So I don't know where they were coming from. That's a question for the county employees to explain to you where those ballots came from. That whole next week. I don't know where they came from. Speaker 0: Mister Kooky, are you done?

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@larrydarp - LA Darpinian

@rob_voreck @AZAGMayes @realAlexKolodin How did the first auditors certify the 2020 election when it had already been deleted off the server by Maricopa County? "I find it frankly laughable to suggest that a county in response to a subpoena could say we will delete files from the hard drive..." https://rumble.com/vucnp3-maricopa-county-election-workers-caught-red-handed-deleting-archived-files-.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=5

Maricopa County Election Workers CAUGHT RED-HANDED Deleting “Archived” Files From Server Before Del EXCLUSIVE – ELECTION FRAUD ON VIDEO: Maricopa County Election Workers CAUGHT RED-HANDED Deleting “Archived” Files From Server Before Delivery To Auditors This Content Is Mirrored. Please support the o rumble.com

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Oh, it appears the Access Voter Information Database (AVID) Project was designed to prepare for and foster the transition of control of voter records and data to becoming a highly centralized model (from a Hybrid Model) — voter records and data would then be controlled by Secretaries of State and capable of being updated in real-time at respective registrar’s offices. How convenient. And it also appears Garrett Archer was running point for all this as the “Project Manager” for the AVID Project. Imagine that.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥THE RECAP💥 💥Maricopa Recorder (Stephen Richer) just lied about the number of active registered voters in AZ for the 2022 midterms. 💥His number was off by (at least) 140,000 voters, per Maricopa’s own 2022 Elections Planning docs. 💥He credited ERIC for making it possible.

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

So they had direct control over the voter rolls & manipulated them to create ~145,000 imaginary voters, produced extra mail-in ballots for them, completed them & forged the envelopes, had them counted without chain of custody, and also double+ scanned some of them? @DecentFiJC

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@GrizzAliDaddy - Grizz Ali

@veryvirology Per Tesla labs report - 17% of ballots in Maricopa were printed on fake paper - 300k ballots. Dominion vote readers have the ability to read paper stock, but that feature wasn’t turned on. https://cdn.locals.com/documents/545370/545370_4xvgkqqog5dnih1.pdf

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Real paper for the fraudulent mail-in votes, due to the voter roll manipulation & production within the ordinary process; fake paper provided to in-person voters to break machines & send election day votes to adjudication

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

AZ 2020 Counterfeit Ballot Exhibits: Be kind and share? - Maricopa County 2020 Ballot official paper standard - Voter-volunteer ballot hand-examination findings - Maricopa County official response on issue - Further AZ Senate ballot analysis https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/

Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. uncoverdc.com

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

So the election day & subsequent days' contact points are: Delivery of ballots without chain of custody Delivery, loading of bad ballot paper Falsified envelope signature verification Adjudication process Offsite transport, storage & destruction Double-scanning Did I miss any?

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Each of those steps requires observably criminal actions by a person that is in on it & deliberately committing election fraud. Maybe not so much the ballot paper delivery or loading. That just requires incompetence & sloppiness.

Real_RobN
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 2:20 AM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 3:11 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Get your mind blown tonight? Here’s how the Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs stole another election, This is just out of 300K ballots examined, Voter deceased as of Oct 1 800 blank 1800 no signatures And her tabulators rejected a quarter of a million Kari Lakes https://t.co/Y0PvZI9WLQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 2022 election in Arizona, numerous irregularities were found. One example is a ballot envelope of a deceased voter that passed without challenge. Over 800 blank ballots with no signature were also counted, which violates state statutes. Additionally, there were voter registration files with incorrect signatures. The tabulators used in Maricopa County did not meet the required error rate, averaging 235 times higher than the standard. This led to the rejection of over a quarter of a million ballots due to feed errors. These issues highlight the problems in the election process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I want the audience wants their mind blown this morning. Give us 1 or 2 examples that you think are the most egregious. Speaker 1: Sure. So we processed a dead voter ballot envelope. The man died several days before the election. And on the ballot signature component where they're supposed to sign their name, Somebody wrote on there, voter is deceased as of October 1st, signed his name, and that passed right through without any form of challenge whatsoever. Over 800 blank ballots with no signature at all, which is a secondary statute violation. Because in the state of Arizona, there's no curing a blank envelope without a signature on election day. That that vote shouldn't count. We found 1800 out of 300,000 analyzed. They have no signature whatsoever, no phone number, no date. We have seen voter registration files with the wrong signatures on them. It's a disaster. Well, let me tell you how perfect this election was. We also analyzed the slog files, Okay? The slug files are the system log files that tell you every read in those tabulators for the 2022 election. They claim that the EAC is the regulating agency that takes care of those tabulators and decides which ones are used and how they're used. These tabulators are not to exceed an error rate of 0.002 or 1 in 500 ballots. On election day. Maricopa County used 446 tabulators, not one of them met EAC standard. As a matter of fact, they averaged 235 times the EAC standard, rejecting over a quarter of a 1000000 ballots in ballot feed errors
Real_RobN
Posted - December 16, 2023 at 3:40 AM
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 6:06 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, the Insurrection of 2020 executed and certified by Katie Hobbs Over 25,000 ballots used in the Arizona Nov 3, 2020 Insurrection CONFIRMED FRAUDULENT. Meaning 25,000 ballots are invalid, illegal, criminal as Katie Hobbs and fraudulent as Robert L. Peters himself. https://t.co/i4B9Usk7iV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the PDF used for the election process in Maricopa County. The election provider customizes the ballots based on geographical areas to ensure voters are selecting the appropriate candidates. There are over 5,000 different permutations and combinations of these ballots, which are also available in Spanish. The reason for creating these ballots in advance is to accommodate third-party mail-in ballots and early voting options. However, the quality of the printed ballots in this group is significantly lower than what would be expected from a PDF. They appear to be degraded compared to on-demand or third-party printed ballots.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other finding here was that we had approximately 25,000 ballots that were not created from the PDF that is used for the election process. So in other words, the election provider comes up with ballots and it's specific to of geographical area because the person that lives in this neighborhood might not be voting for the same people that live in that neighborhood or another neighborhood. So here in Maricopa County from memory, you had 5,012 or something like that, just over 5,000 different permutations and combinations to the ballots. Then that's multiplied by 2 because there's a Spanish version that's available for each one of these ballots, but it's the same ballot with the same people just in a different language. So we've got 5, we'll just say 5,000 different ballots for now that are created ahead of time and those are created in PDF. Now the big reason why is you have of third party send out mail in ballots, so those have to be created in advance. And second, for your early voting, you have vote on demand. So in other words, even if I live way out in the corner of the county, but I work downtown, I could go to something downtown that could print my ballot from my area and I could vote here. It's convenient, a lot of people do that. These PDFs are created in advance. They're obviously good quality PDFs and when they're printed, they should look roughly or exactly the same. In this group of ballots, I find that the quality is severely degraded from what a PDF would be as if printed on demand or if printed by your, third party provider who prints these all the time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In June of 2021, we informed them about our suspicion of over 25,000 counterfeit ballots. However, the GOP and conservative operatives spread propaganda to undermine our credibility. Despite having ample time to prevent a repeat in 2022, they chose to do nothing. As a result, they enabled the same fraudulent activity to occur again in 2020.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fact. Now early on, I want you to know, in July of 21 actually, before that, we, we told them in June. We told them that we suspected from what we're seeing 25,000 plus counterfeit inauthentic ballots. That was early on in the process. Again, because of propaganda by the GOP's attorney, the GOP, other conservative operatives, they planted the seed inside this that you can't trust that. No. That's not it, etcetera. You'll hear more about it. But every one of the people up there knew this in advance even of this hearing today. Now the reason I bring that up is they had well over a year and a half to react to this so it wouldn't be duplicated in 2022, but they didn't. They did nothing, and they allowed it. They enabled this to be done again in 2020
Real_RobN
Posted - December 18, 2023 at 1:42 AM
Saved - December 18, 2023 at 6:41 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is the Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs to Maricopa County, this is how many ballots I need from you. 30% of duplicates came in between Nov. 4 - Nov. 9th of 2020, https://t.co/GLwgsgZ4VH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Further analysis of the duplicates and the EVVs revealed an interesting trend. The graph shows the duplicates in relation to the daily percentage of EVVs. There was a sudden significant increase in the percentage of duplicates on certain days, with 96% of the ballots being duplicates on two of those days. The area under the curve represents around 25-30% of the duplicates, which were received between November 4th and November 9th. This led us to remove the blanks and scribbles from the plot, and the same phenomenon was observed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As we did further analysis on the blanks I mean, sorry, the duplicates and the EDVRE. And this is what's interesting. So what we're plotting here is the duplicates as a function of the daily percentage of EVVs. So here's the signal. But what you see is you see suddenly this what you may call a significant growth in percentage. In fact, in Several of these days, there's 96% of the ballots that came in on 2 of these days are, are duplicates. So there was a serious number of duplicates. In fact, the area under this curve is close to 30%, 25 to 30% of the duplicates came in between, November 4th to to November 9th. And that motivated us to also on the same plot Drop the blanks and the scribbles, and you see the same phenomenon there.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 18, 2023 at 4:17 PM
Saved - December 18, 2023 at 6:41 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is the Arizona audit of the Nov 3, 2020 Insurrection 74, 243 ballots returned and counted in the 2020 Insurrection with NO RECORD of ever being Sent Out. Note: Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, https://t.co/QRuAgseJNy

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona without a clear record of being sent. In Arizona, there are supposed to be records (EB32s and EB33s) of when a mail-in ballot is sent and received. The number of EB32s should be higher than the number of EB33s. However, in this case, there are more ballots received than there are records of being sent. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but it is unclear if they were actually sent to them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 7,000 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's there's, EB 32s and EB 33s. EB32 is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent, and an EB33 is supposed to give a record of when, the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EB32s more sent out than there are that are received. Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to. And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 9:08 PM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 12:26 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is the greatest criminal conspiracy in Arizona’s history, Plotted by the Secretary of State. Carried out by the Secretary of State. Executed by the Secretary of State. And certified by the Secretary of State Katie Hobbs. https://t.co/WP9IqjIkCJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
There were odd patterns in the ballots, with repeated anomalies over multiple days. Some ballots had a pattern of 7 for Biden and 1 for Trump, which is statistically unlikely. The patterns were reported, but it's unclear if they were included in the final report. The physical recount aligned with the claimed numbers, but behind the scenes, there were over 17,000 duplicate mail-in ballots. The audit suggests that over 60,000 counted ballots may be illegal, which could significantly impact the election outcome. Voting is considered the most important right in the United States, and having it stolen is devastating.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would watch the ballots go by, and there were odd patterns. I questioned the patterns of repeats that I saw. That is an anomaly that was repeated over multiple days. Speaker 1: 7 of those ballots are for Biden, one for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump. That clearly doesn't that's not statistically Speaker 0: possible. If I had a box of all vitamins and it didn't look like I had an old box of all vitamins, wouldn't I just, like, It sticks them in. We reported the patterns on Speaker 2: the ballots, and, of course, we reported all of this to, the leads, but not quite sure if it actually got into the report. Speaker 3: The physical recount or the physical balance Pretty much aligned with what they claim. What they didn't tell you is behind the scenes, there were 17,000 plus duplicate mail in ballots. Speaker 4: The audit has revealed that possibly well over 60,000 of these counted ballots are illegal ballots. And without further investigation, we do not know whether a ballot is legal or illegal. And that must be determined. And the staggering difference in these numbers is way more than enough to alter and change every aspect of the outcome of this election. Speaker 1: We've had something very unique in this country And that we have freedom and that we get to decide who our president is, who our vice president is, who our Our elected officials are. We get to choose. Speaker 0: Your vote is your single most important right on Earth here in the United States. And to have that stolen from you is, I'm just bringing you to tears. Excuse me. It's the most important thing. The most important thing Speaker 4: that we could do.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 23, 2023 at 12:41 AM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 2:32 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Katie Hobbs belongs in prison +37,000 security queries logs deleted +4000 registered/voted after deadline +11,000 voted not on voter rolls +18,000 voted/removed after election +74,000 ballots returned/counted NO RECORD EVER BIENG SENT OUT And Dominion’s best friend SHARPIES https://t.co/vs2fastaQn

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker highlights several concerning issues related to the recent election. They mention the deletion of security logs, thousands of voters registering and voting after the deadline, individuals voting who were not on the voter rolls, and ballots being sent without evidence. The speaker also mentions a memo from Maricopa County instructing the use of Sharpies on election day, which raises concerns about ballot validity. They suggest that Republicans who waited to vote on election day may have been affected by this. Overall, the speaker raises questions about the integrity of the election process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At me from the hearing last week, was the 37,000 plus security queries in March that occurred that where logs were deleted, the almost 4,000 registered voters, registered and then voted after the October 15th deadline. And then of course the 11,000 who voted, who weren't on the voter rolls the 7th November, but showed up in December on the 4th December. And then of course the 18 who voted and were removed from the roles after the election. But then the biggest data point that jumped out at all of us, was the fact that over 74,000 mail in ballots occurred without any evidence of anything having been sent to them. So this is where nearly 7, 7 times The total The delta, right. And think about this, the memo that we now have found that Maricopa County sent out that said, hey, Sharpies are what the rule of the day will be on election day. And I just tried it last night on a regular piece of paper in my printer using a Sharpie as though I were filling in a bubble and clearly it bled through to the other side, which then of course calls into question the ballot and makes it have to be adjudicate. And the fact that Sharpies were encouraged just solely for election day really begs the question that as everyone knew, Republicans who waited to vote on election day as they did in my 4 counties, predominantly did show up on that day.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 23, 2023 at 10:09 PM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 10:17 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, +255,000 early votes with no record +23,000 voted by mail after moved out of state/county +23,000 double votes 9,000 more mail in ballots received/recorded than official number +50,000 fraudulent ballots And Dominion’s best friend the internet https://t.co/A3RSZvyEpV

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the hearing, several key points were highlighted. Firstly, there were over 255,000 early votes without corresponding entries in the final vote record. Additionally, more than 23,000 individuals voted by mail after moving out of the state or county. It was also discovered that 23,000 voters cast double votes. Furthermore, there were 9,000 more recorded mail-in ballots than the official count. The machines used in the election were found to be connected to the internet, despite previous claims. Remote access to the election management system was also possible. While the hand recount confirmed similar counts, there are concerns of fraud. The audit did not determine Joe Biden as the winner, contrary to some interpretations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lot of, misinformation and pieces floating around earlier today and last night. The key takeaways from the hearing today, looking at my notes, there were more than 255,000 early votes shown in the county's final vote that did not have a corresponding early voting entry. Meaning, they didn't have that record, but they yet there was 255,000 ballots. That is a lot of ballots. There were also over 23,000 who voted by mail after moving after the the cutoff. So they no longer lived in the state or in the county. There were 200 I'm sorry. There were 23,000 voters, who had cast double votes. There were 9,000 more mail in ballots were received and recorded than the official number of mail in ballots. There's a large discrepancy, more than 255 thousand in discrepancy, and you talked about the 50,000 that was leaked in the report last night saying that, there could potentially be these fraudulent ballots. We also know that the machines were connected into the Internet. Contrary to what the county was saying before the audit saying that they weren't connected to the Internet. They weren't connected to the Internet. We learned conclusively that they were. And not only were they connected to the Internet, but there was also remote access available to the EMS system, the election management system that was used. So there's a lot of discrepancies. There's a a lot of explaining to do. And I wanna point out the fact that the audit did not say that Joe Biden won. That is a leftist spin that's putting on it, they are the part that confirms the hand recount is the same thing as counting potentially fraudulent ballots. It's same thing we saw in Georgia right after the election. We saw a lot of people concerned saying why are they doing a recount of the same fraudulent ballots to get the same, the same fraudulent results. Well, it it was part of the investigation and they did did that. So that's the explanation of where that count comes from. And they say the counts do match. They are close. However, there is a lot of indications of fraud. And so that that's the discrepancy. That's the been on the misinformation. So we need to see what comes of it, but there there was a lot of information that came out today.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 27, 2023 at 12:23 AM
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 4:41 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is Secretary of State Katie Hobbs responding how she robbed two U.S. elections, 104,820 ballots examined 20, 232 mismatched signatures Meaning this is only 5% of the 1.9 million ballots cast just in Maricopa County alone and Katie Hobbs belongs in prison. https://t.co/KbNvNJpZRq

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the analysis of ballot curing in Maricopa County. They compare the conservative case, where 11.29% of ballots should have been cured, to the county's curing rate of 1.31%. The speaker highlights that the number of ballots that should have been cured is far greater than what the county actually cured. They also mention that based on the extended study, a minimum of 4,965 ballots should have been thrown out due to signature mismatches, compared to the county's 587. The conclusion is that the county's signature verification process is flawed, contradicting their claim of having a rigorous process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Redoing the analysis. Okay? So what do we find? We find in the most conservative case, 11.29%, 215,856 ballots should have been cured. Okay? All right. So let's compare that now. So what that means is that when you line up in this 2nd analysis, more conservative analysis, it goes from 11% to 41%, but we've only used the 11.29% to put forward that 200 at minimum, 215,856 ballots should have been cured. That is far more than what the county cured, which is 25,000. Okay? So that's the so discussion wise, you know, the county cured 25,000, which is 1.31%. And what we're saying here is that 11.29% should have been cured, which is about 10% 10 times more. Okay? Let's see this. One second here. Okay. Someone says, alright. So that's what we did here. Sorry about that. And so this is what we find. So the discussion is the following. If based on the extended study as you're seeing here, that yields a minimum signature mismatch rate of 12.29% and the county's post curing mismatch rate of 2.3%, that means 4,965 EVBs at minimum. That's what see right here should have been, thrown out versus 587. So that's important in such a close race. Alright? And the conclusion that we have that we wanna put forward is the Malacca Maricopa County election department states that it has a rigorous signature verification process. If you read their stuff, they say they have a rigorous signature verification process, but they only cured 25,000. And our extended study confirms a pilot study and puts forward that they actually have a flawed signature verification process. That's our
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, Jordan Conrad, questions Miss Hobbs about authorizing additional testing and the signatures on mail-in ballot updates. He accuses her of being unaware that the signatures do not match those of the voters. Miss Hobbs, as the secretary of state, oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona. The conversation becomes heated, with the speaker using profanity and asking if Miss Hobbs said something disrespectful.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is that you? Yes, sir. How's it going? Jordan Conrad with the Gateway the additional testing. Did did you authorize this? Miss Hobbs? Miss Hobbs? What about the signatures on the mail in ballot updates? Are you are you aware of what those look like, that they look nothing like the signatures of the voter. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, we oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona either. Fucking rest for I'm at the gym. Give it a effing grass. Is that what you said?
Video Transcript AI Summary
These are examples of approved and failed ballots. The Voter Privacy Act prohibits inspectors from examining ballots to verify signatures. Many of the reviewed ballots have two different patterns of the letter "S" in the signature, even though some owners' names don't contain an "S." In total, 104,820 ballots were reviewed, with 20,232 having mismatched signatures.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now now L. Okay. Yeah. Clothes. These are examples of some that were later approved. The the ones don't say they approved the they didn't get questions. Is that This example here, as you can tell, it is a failed. It Scaled and approved and there is written on the envelope See Enclosed Notes RE Signature. Once again, we go back to statute and the Voter Privacy Act which does not allow for an Inspector to look through a ballot for any faith to justify that signature. Mel. As you guys can see, many of these ballots contain 2 essence Written in different patterns, we identified well over a 100 so far that have 2 S's documented for the signature Many of which didn't even contain an s in the name of the owner. The total balance we have reviewed today is 104,820. We got 20,232 mismatched signatures
Real_RobN
Posted - December 27, 2023 at 3:56 PM
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 4:39 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here’s the AZ audit laying out more crimes certified by Katie Hobbs, Shelby Bush Not only 1,870 blank ballots were accepted in violation of A.R.S 16-550 they were CURED, STAMPED and VERIFIED without signatures on 11-8-20, 5 days after the statutory deadline of 7 pm election day, https://t.co/S6CaOUg6b3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a violation regarding blank envelopes in the election. They state that according to the statute, blank envelopes cannot be cured and must have a signature by 7 pm on election day. However, they found 1,870 cured ballots without signatures. One example is a blank envelope without a signature or phone number, which was cured and verified after the statutory expiration. Another ballot was received on election day. When questioned, the speaker confirms that the metadata shows the envelopes were cured on November 8th, five days after the election. Another speaker points out that the statute allows for five working days, excluding weekends and holidays. They argue that the election was on Tuesday, so only three days should be counted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1st violation we found was blank envelopes. The statute is very clear that a blank envelope has no ability to be cured. A signature must be rendered on that envelope by 7 pm on election day. However, we found 18 70 ballots that were cured against this particular statute. The first example you'll see here, it's blank with no signature. It also does not include a phone number. Not only was this ballot cured and stamped verified without a signature, it was done so in a 5 day curing period, idea, which was 11/8, 5 days after the statutory expiration. The next one was received on election day. November Speaker 1: to that point, madam chair. Speaker 0: Go ahead. Speaker 1: Miss, miss Busch, you're saying that you believe it was cured after the 5 day period? Speaker 0: Madam Chair, Senator Bennet, yes, we have the metadata for these envelopes that tell us the date of any adaptations, changes, or curing. It will give us the date and time that that envelope was scanned back into the system as repaired or cured. And this one was metadata stamped as being cured on November 8th. Speaker 1: And the election, madam chair, senate miss Bush, election was on what date? Speaker 0: November 3rd. Speaker 1: Madam chair, I believe the statute allows for 5 working days, and and that excludes the Saturday, Sunday. And in this election in 2022, Monday was a holiday. So Did you account for the business days, 5 days? Because I I believe that the election was on Tuesday. They had Wednesday, Thursday, Friday would have been the 3rd day. Saturday, Sunday, And a holiday on Monday would not be included, and therefore, Tuesday and Wednesday of the following week would have been
Video Transcript AI Summary
On November 8th, it was discovered that blank envelopes were being subjected to a curing period, which goes against the stated policy. The speaker clarifies that if a signature box on an envelope is unsigned by 7 p.m. on election night, it cannot be cured. The speaker also mentions that in cases where there is no phone number provided, the county would typically refer to the voter registration record to contact the voter, but some registrations lack phone numbers. The transcript ends with another example of a ballot being cured without a signature, which violates the statute.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Correct. November 8th was well within the curing period. Right. The problem with this is blank envelopes are clearly stated in statute and also in the policy and procedure manual to not be subjected to a 5 day curing period. They must be resolved by 7 PM on election day. Speaker 1: Okay. I've that I agree with, but, I thought you were saying that you found some of these ballots cured on November 8, Which was not within the 5 day period. What I think you're really saying is that in the case of unsigned signature boxes on envelopes, If it's unsigned as of 7 p. M. On election night, it's not curable in the 1st place? Speaker 0: Madam chair, Senator Bennett, that is correct. Speaker 1: Okay. Thank Speaker 2: you. Thank you for that clarification. Just matching this slide, please. Speaker 0: Yep. So, as you'll see, there's a few more examples of the same scenario. Speaker 2: Madam Chair, quick question. Go ahead. Thank you, Madam Chair. And Mrs. Bush, If there's no phone number on there, how does the county contact the voter to tell them to come in all And verify. Speaker 0: So madam chair, senator Borrelli, normally, the signature verification team would then need to lend to the voter record or the voter file, which would be their most recent voter registration record to pull those numbers. The unfortunate thing that we have found during this audit is that we actually have some accounts. None of those registrations have phone numbers. We also have reports from some of the signature verification team it worked in 2022 who said they had no numbers accessible to them when they were carrying ballots. So it it makes it more difficult, but it doesn't necessarily mean that the voter does not have a phone number available to the elections department. Go ahead. So again, this is just a third example of that same scenario. This ballot was received on November 3rd by the elections department and then was given a carrying period and cured without a signature, which is again in violation of statute.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 27, 2023 at 10:40 PM
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 10:44 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here are Maricopa County OWN ELECTION OFFICIALS, CONFIRMING how Katie Hobbs fucked 2 elections back to back and certified herself as the governor at all costs. There is an intentional desire to pass ballots through at all costs even though the ballots are illegal. https://t.co/T2AUA3a3mx

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker refers to declarations from signature verification workers in 2022. One worker named Andrew mentions that the numbers on the whiteboard for the ballots to be verified didn't add up. They were processing around 60,000 signatures a day, but only receiving about 1,000 envelopes for review the next day, instead of the expected 12,000 to 15,000. The rejection rates were consistent at 20% to 30%, but the math didn't seem to match the actual numbers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, Madam Chair, I would like to refer to some of the declarations of the 2022 Signature verification workers that we interviewed. All of these statements, I've provided to you in exhibit form, and they are, sworn declarations. MARC So, the first one I'd like to cite is Exhibit 1, Declaration of Andrew from Myers. And, that would be page 4, paragraph 21. In my room, we had a whiteboard that Michelle would update with numbers of ballots to be verified that day. Throughout the day, Michelle would update the progress the people were making in verifying signatures. The math never added up. Typically, we were processing about 60,000 signatures a day. I would hear that people were rejecting 20% to 30%, which means I would expect to see 12,000 to 15,000 ballots in my pile for curing the next day. However, I would consistently see every morning only about 1,000 envelopes to be cured. We typically saw about 1 tenth of the rejected ballots we were told we would see. In Andy's declaration, he notes that the rejection rates were consistent with our findings at 20% to 30%. But he also noted that the math just didn't seem to add up. He was only seeing a 1,000 envelopes per day at that next level of securing process for review, even though the math said he should have received $12,000 or more the following day. Now, Madame
Video Transcript AI Summary
Exhibit 2, the declaration of Jacqueline Onekeit, reveals that level 1 reviewers were sometimes asked to re-review their own work due to high workload. The review process lacked consistent observation, with only Andrew's work being observed occasionally. Level 1 workers were also instructed to override decisions made by more skilled level 2 and 3 workers who rejected ballots. Instead of following the usual curing process for rejected ballots, they were sent back to less trained employees to attempt to pass them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chair and distinguished committee, I would like to refer you to Exhibit 2, the declaration of Jacqueline Onekeit. On page 2, paragraph 11 through 13. At times when the workload was high, Level 2 and 3 Managers sent some of their work, which was to review our level one work back to level 1 again to re review the work we had already done. There were observers watching the review of level 1, but there were not any observers watching all of the review Sometimes, the observers were able to watch some of the work of Andrew, a level 2 manager, but were not able to observe any of the work of the other level 2 managers, Jeff and William. After the above signature review, the approved signature ballots were counted and the rejected signature ballots were sent into a process whereby the ballots could be cured. In this declaration, Jacqueline points out that not only were level 1 review workers being tasked with reviewing other level 1 reviewers work, But according to Andrew's declaration on page 2, paragraph 9, the level 1 workers were being asked to re view and override the decisions made of level 2 and 3 workers that rejected ballots. They were more skilled and had more access to voter registration files. And when those ballots were rejected, instead of sending them into curing as would be the process, They would send them back to a temporary unskilled, not as well trained employee to try and see if they could get it to pass. Madam Chair, to this point. Go ahead. Thank you. Madam Chair and Mrs. Bush,
Video Transcript AI Summary
These statements are declarations taken by an attorney and were provided by workers employed by Maricopa County Elections Department. The affidavits confirm that the county could not adequately review the number of ballots claimed within the given time. They also suggest an intentional desire to pass a ballot through, even if it may not be legitimate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go ahead. Speaker 1: Thank you. Madam chair and missus Bush, I guess for some context, could I could I could I get some context on these on these statements? Are these, statements from, like, court proceedings? Are they legal documents? Or is it just a conversation you had with a person? Speaker 2: Madam Chair, Senator Mendez, both. So these declarations that have been provided to you were actually taken by an attorney. It was an independent interview That, I personally did not have anything to do with. However, our team was able to sit down Based off this declaration and interview each of these workers. All of them were employed by Maricopa County Elections Department. 2 of them worked in both managerial level and hearing, and one of them was a first level employee of Maricopa County for multiple election cycles. Schools? Speaker 0: Could you sort of explain it in plain language, 20 words or less? What It means of what these affidavits are stating for the rest of us untrained in these matters? Speaker 2: Absolutely. So what these affidavits are basically stating is they're confirming the fact that there is no way possible that the county could Adequately review the number of ballots that they claim to review in the time provided. It also indicates that there is a a, intentional, Desire to have the vote count, so therefore, the system is set up to lean towards trying to, pass a ballot through at all costs, even if that doesn't necessarily mean that the ballot is legitimate.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 28, 2023 at 4:40 AM
Saved - December 28, 2023 at 7:32 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here are all the 446 Dominion machines they like to call tabulators in Maricopa County in 2022, “When you have a 95% failure rate, why are we feeding 5,000 ballots into a tabulator?” ADJUDICATION [see election 2020] Note: He, him, they, them Katie Hobbs belongs in prison https://t.co/ZBGHVOicyd

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2022, the speaker presents data on the Maricopa County elections. They show a slide with the names of polling centers and dots representing tabulators. None of the 446 tabulators in the county were compliant with the Election Assistance Corporation regulations. The error rate was significantly higher, with some tabulators failing at a rate of 95%. Despite these failures, they were still used to process 5,000 ballots.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gonna show us is is 2022 data? This is 2022 data. Okay. That is correct. So this next slide is the actual Maricopa County elections. So what you will see here is every single tabulator and 2 30 2 23 polling centers. Each one of those lines at the bottom represent the name of that polling center and each of the dots above represent the tabulator. As you can see, not one of the 4 46 tabulators in Maricopa County. We're EAC compliant. Every single one of them fail in an error rate much, much higher. Some, at average, 235 times the Election Assistance Corporation federal regulation. And you can see some tabulators up above failed at a rate as high as 95%, yet they continued to be commissioned and used. When you have a 95% failure rate, why are we feeding 5,000 ballots into a tabulator with that high of a malfunction.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 29, 2023 at 3:14 AM
Saved - December 29, 2023 at 11:20 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here’s the new program Fuck Signatures Katie Hobbs certified for 2 elections. “I asked Celia what the low confidence banner on the screen said, and she said just not to worry about that. This was a new program that they were testing.” Note: Katie Hobbs belongs inside a cage https://t.co/2eidiDwICv

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker describes their observations during a ballot verification process. They noticed a yellow banner indicating "low confidence" on some ballots, but the signatures being compared were illegible and didn't match. The speaker asked about it, but was told not to worry as it was a new program being tested. Later, there was a server outage, but the lights were still on. When the computers came back up, a person who previously had a yellow banner now had a green one indicating "high confidence." The speaker observed conversations among the screeners and heard one person say they were now working on high confidence instead of low confidence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And in the bottom right hand corner was a yellow yellow banner. And I got to a into a position where I could see the yellow banner, which said low confidence. Then I started paying much closer attention to the signatures thinking this didn't even make sense to me because the signature on the ballot that was being compared to other signatures didn't even resemble in any way what they were comparing it to They were completely illegible They were just scribbles on the ballot And there were 5 screeners screening low confidence ballots for an entire afternoon that I was in there And I asked Celia, what the low confidence said. And she said just not to worry about that, that this was a new program that they were testing. And I said, Okay, so I continued watching. And, shortly after I talked with her, I had a few other questions. And at that time, she suggested that I just sit down at the table where we were in our little area that we were supposed to remain. Shortly after that, there was a server outage. And I believe on my affidavit, I said there was a power outage. But in actuality, the lights were still on. It was just the servers in that room that went out for maybe 10 to 15 minutes. So I'm sitting there thinking, where did all those signatures go that were in the queue for them to check? That was one of my questions. Then when the computers came back up, the, gentleman that I could see quite well, all of a sudden had a green banner. And it said high confidence. And I just sat there very quietly watching because then they had some conversations. There were 5, screeners all in 1 small area. They had some conversation. And the question from 1 of them to this gentleman was, Are you still doing what we were doing? Meaning low confidence And he said, No, I'm doing high confidence
Real_RobN
Posted - January 21, 2024 at 10:54 PM
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 4:53 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, The Arizona Audit CONFIRMS: Katie Hobbs utilized her single greatest crime of 2020 for the 2022 election. 25% of all 2020 mail-in-ballots equaling 420,987 ballots out of 1.9 million CONFIRMED to have NO signature match just in Maricopa County alone. https://t.co/eMyFdGhpTc

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Arizona audit, Maricopa County made it clear that signature verification was off-limits. However, it's easy to understand why they didn't want us to examine the signatures because, in reality, they don't match.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Talked about signature verification has been that 3rd rail in Maricopa County. You can't touch it. You can't talk about it. And that was really the line in the sand that the county drew during the Arizona audit. And it's not difficult to see why they don't want us looking at those signatures because guess what? They don't match.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Signature verification is a process used to determine the legitimacy of a vote by comparing the voter's ballot envelope to the affidavit. In the 2020 election, 420,987 ballot envelopes failed signature verification, and the system was never fixed. As a result, the same issues persisted in the 2022 election, leaving the system vulnerable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So signature verification is a process by which you take the voter, ballot envelope and compare it to the affidavit in order to determine whether it's a legitimate vote. So there are 2 areas that we looked at that we wanna share with you today. The first one is the signature verification of 2020 and how that relates to 2022. 420,987 ballot envelopes failed signature verification in the 2020 election. The system was never repaired. And because of that, those same issues that caused the massive amount of failures was still in existence in the 2020 election. In the 2020 in the 2022 election, which has left our system still vulnerable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election using 150 trained workers. They followed the guidelines in the secretary of state manual and analyzed each voter record individually. The statistics from the first 25% of the ballots were extrapolated to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 acknowledges that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, with about 1.9 million of them being mail-in ballots. Speaker 1 confirms this and the conversation continues.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go back one slide. Who determined the the number 420,987 from the 2020 election? Is that your organization that determined there were that number of failed signatures, or was that the number reported by all of the counties in in Arizona? Speaker 1: So madam chair, Senator Bennett, that number is based on a a, A review of a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the 2020 election. We used a 150 Trained workers that studied the secretary of state manual and followed those guidelines, And then they analyzed each voter record individually. Once we got the statistics for that first 25% or 400,000 ballots, Then it was extrapolated to determine the final number. Those are Maricopa County. That is just Maricopa County. Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the point I was gonna make, madam chair, is I think Maricopa County alone, had 2,089,563 ballots in 2020, and 1 about 1,900,000 of them were by mail. And so Your group analyzed about 25 percent of those 1,900,000 in Maricopa County, Came up with a percentage that you considered to have failed signature verification, then you extrapolate it to get to the 429, 20,000. Speaker 1: Madam chair, senator Bennett, that is correct. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: Okay. Proceed.
Real_RobN
Posted - January 26, 2024 at 3:57 PM
Saved - January 26, 2024 at 7:29 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, The Arizona Senate Audit CONFIRMS Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, There are 74, 243 mail in ballots that are TIED to individuals returned and cast in the Nov 3, 2020 election with NO RECORD of ever being SENT OUT. https://t.co/6jwN14wPtT

Video Transcript AI Summary
I ignored advice from a politician to avoid discussing the forensic audit, the 2020 election, distancing myself from President Trump, and questioning COVID vaccines and mandates. Instead, I visited the forensic audit site and openly talked about our corrupt elections. Now, more evidence is emerging every day.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ben, I remember somebody who was in politics telling me when I first started, do not talk about the forensic audit. Don't talk about the 2020 election. Distance yourself from president Trump. And whatever you do, don't bring up COVID or question the vaccines or the mandates. And I looked at this guy, and I basically kicked him out. And I took all of his suggestions and advice, and I threw it in the Trash can, and I immediately went down, and I toured the forensic audit site. And I started talking about our corrupt elections. And, you know, people have finally caught up. We're seeing some more evidence every single day come out.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Arizona, there are 74,243 mail-in ballots without a clear record of being sent. The state uses EB32s to track when a ballot is sent and EB33s to track when it is received. The number of EB32s should be higher than the number of EB33s. These 74,000 ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but there is no evidence that they were actually sent to them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's EB32s and EB33s. EB32s is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent. And an EB33 is supposed to give a record of when the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EB32s more sent out than there are that are received. Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to. And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
Real_RobN
Posted - February 22, 2024 at 2:56 AM
Saved - February 22, 2024 at 5:33 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, “We now know all of the different ways that are elections are rigged, taken, stolen, WHERE THE FRAUD IS and who is RESPONSIBLE for it” Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5M additional ballots, If Maricopa has 2,575,400 voters why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1M ballots? https://t.co/oEuSKsCFpI

Video Transcript AI Summary
We now know how elections are rigged, with Maricopa County mailing more ballots than voters. This shows extra ballots were printed to manipulate the election. States are avoiding scrutiny of ballots, and censorship of truth reveals we are on the right track.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what's going on is we now know all of the different ways that our elections are rigged, taken, stolen, where the fraud is, who's responsible for it, and how it happens. Short one. If Maricopa County has 2,005,400 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4,100,000 ballots? You know why? Because if you're gonna steal an election and it's going to be an election by mail predominantly, and if mail is the currency, mail is the contract that mail in ballot. Well, if you're gonna swap ballots or or if you're gonna control it, you have to have extra ballots. Bottom line, they printed 1,500,000 additional ballots. That is why 2 things are occurring. All of these states are trying very hard to avoid us looking at the ballot. But the second thing, think about it. If we were lying about what happened, if it was inconsequential, would they be censoring us? Do they censor people who don't matter? Do they censor topics that really are horse crap? No. They censor us because we have the goods, we have the truth. So understand even censorship that's going on proves we're all on the right track.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the secret testing on election machines in Maricopa County, Arizona. He asks about discrepancies in signatures on mail-in ballots. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, oversaw elections in the area. Jordan expresses frustration and asks for a break while at the gym.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How's it going? Jordan Conrad with Gateway Plumbing. So, you know, I have some questions about the election in Arizona. You know, Maricopa County, they did these secret testing on the machines, which for the election procedures manual, you were supposed to oversee, do additional testing on. Did did you authorize this? Miss Hobbs? Miss Hobbs, what about the signatures on the mailing ballot updates? Are you are you aware of what those look like? That they look nothing like the signatures of the voter? Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, we oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona either. Fucking best for him. You mean I'm at the gym. Give it I'm at the gym. Give it a effing rest. Is that what you said?
Real_RobN
Posted - May 29, 2024 at 8:27 PM
Saved - May 30, 2024 at 12:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Arizona Senate Audit reveals that two independent forensic experts have concluded that Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes inserted over 25,000 counterfeit ballots into the 2020 General Election, suggesting a potential criminal enterprise certified by the U.S. Congress on January 6th.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, The Arizona Senate Audit of the 2020 election CONFIRMS, Two FORENSIC EXPERTS completely independent of each other CONCLUDE. Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes inserted +25,000 COUNTERFEIT ballots into the Arizona 2020 General Election, 📝Meaning U.S. Congress certified a criminal enterprise on Jan 6.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the usual PDF format for the election process in Maricopa County. These ballots are tailored to specific geographical areas to account for different voting preferences. The ballots are created in advance in PDF format for mail-in and early voting convenience. However, the quality of the printed ballots in this case was significantly lower than expected, indicating a problem with the printing process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other finding here was that we had approximately 25,000 ballots that were not created from the PDF that is used for the election process. So in other words, the election provider comes up with ballots and it's specific to a geographical area because the person that lives in this neighborhood might not be voting for the same people that live in that neighborhood or another neighborhood. So here in Maricopa County from memory, you had 5,012 or something like that, just over 5,000 different permutations and combinations to the ballots. Then that's multiplied by 2 because there's a Spanish version that's available for each one of these ballots, but it's the same ballot with the same people just in a different language. So we've got 5, we'll just say 5,000 different ballots for now that are created ahead of time and those are created in PDF. Now, the big reason why is you have a third party send out mail in ballots, so those have to be created in advance. And second, for your early voting, you have vote on demand. So in other words, even if I live way out in the corner of the county but I work downtown, I could go to something downtown that could print my ballot from my area and I could vote here. It's convenient. A lot of people do that. These PDFs are created in advance. They're obviously good quality PDFs and when they're printed, they should look roughly or exactly the same. In this group of ballots, I find that the quality is severely degraded from what a PDF would be as if printed on demand or if printed by your, 3rd party provider who prints these all the time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I found that there were 5,000 different ballots created for specific districts in Maricopa County. Additionally, approximately 25,000 ballots did not match the official Dominion PDF ballot, with consistent imperfections around an oval on each one. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's 10,457 vote margin.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There were 2 primary findings, that I had. Number 1 is that there were a series of ballots, that I examined the photographs of, of. And Dominion as the election subcontractor produced ballots for each of the zones or districts that were involved, at least in the area that I looked at here in Maricopa County, and there were 5,000 approximately a little over different ballots. As you know in a state there could be 2 different senator races, there could be 10 different house races, and all the permutations and combinations is what gives you the 5,000. So they create a final ballot for each one of these districts or zones or regions, so that when you go in and you give your name and it knows you're from this area, you would get this ballot to vote on all the issues that pertain to you and only the issues that pertain to you. And I found that there were about 25,000 ballots that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. In other words, the printing process, appearance, is completely different than what you would get from a 1st generation PDF printing. As you can imagine, the lines are perfect, so they're perfectly straight, no breaks in them circles or ovals as they may be, and they're a solid line. When I examined some of the early voting ballots and election day ballots from various polling locations, there were about 25,000 that did not have printing from this perfect PDF as you would expect, but instead had breaks in all the same places around an oval. So you can look at one of the ovals and there are imperfections in the line, and they're in the same place on every single one of these ballots. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent over double the amount of Joe Joe Biden's 10,457 vote margin
Video Transcript AI Summary
In June of 2021, we informed them of suspected counterfeit ballots. Despite warnings, GOP propaganda cast doubt on the legitimacy of the ballots. Officials knew about this but failed to prevent a repeat in 2022. Their inaction enabled the same issue to occur in 2020.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Early on, I want you to know, in July of 21 actually, before that, we, we told them in June. We told them that we suspected, from what we're seeing, 25,000 plus counterfeit inauthentic ballots. That was early on in the process. Again, because of propaganda by the GOP's attorney, the GOP, other conservative operatives, they planted the seed inside this that you can't trust that. No. That's not it, etcetera. You'll hear more about it. But everyone of the people up there knew this in advance, even up this hearing today. Now the reason I bring that up is they had well over a year and a half to react to this, so it wouldn't be duplicated in 2022, but they didn't. They did nothing, and they allowed it. They enabled this to be done again in 2020.

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Arizona 2020 Maricopa Forensic Ballot Audit - 2.1M ballots each examined by hand and high rez photographed front and back. 10%+ found to be non-conforming (counterfeit). Legacy media lies about it all, says they found nothing except some extra Biden votes. https://t.co/D0s6qu0141

Real_RobN
Posted - October 18, 2024 at 11:22 PM
Saved - October 19, 2024 at 9:05 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is, a election official in Fulton County, Georgia, State Farm Arena, Doing the Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, Scanning the same stack of ballots 5 times. https://t.co/Sf5ce2b357

WallStreetApes
Posted - July 4, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Saved - July 5, 2025 at 1:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across alarming claims from the Arizona Senate alleging that Katie Hobbs was involved in election rigging. Investigators reportedly found over 100,000 filled ballots and more than $30 million in unmarked rental cars. They suggest that changes to printer settings were made through computer infiltration, leading to uncontrollable ballots being placed in box 3 and transported to Runbeck. Witnesses indicate that this operation was planned to secure Hobbs' nomination for governor and Adrian Fontes' candidacy for secretary of state, linking it to a broader cartel strategy.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

What is this??? The Arizona Senate says Katie Hobbs was involved in election rigging Investigators found “more than a 100,000 filled in ballot and more than $30 million dollars were identified by our investigators in unmarked rental cars” “Changes to their printer settings despite being tested the night before the election. The changes in those settings were made through computer infiltration. ‌ Th uncontrollable ballots were placed in box 3 and allegedly driven to Runbeck. Witness information provided on October 2020 confirms that more than a 100,000 filled in ballot and more than $30 million dollars were identified by our investigators in unmarked rental cars ‌ These vans were loaded with the ballots and cash at a private residence in Mesa and driven to Runbeck's office. ‌ — This was a planned loss. Hobbs would receive the democratic nomination for governor, and Adrian Fontes would run for secretary of state to replace Hobbs. The strategy appeared to have been planned. She goes on to say this is part of a cartel operation to get their key players in positions of power

Video Transcript AI Summary
Illegal transfers were made to Runbeck, with phony deeds created by Britney used to move money to candidates through for-profit and nonprofit PACs. During the 2022 election, ballot scanners and printers at 70 precincts had printer setting changes via computer infiltration, despite pre-election testing. Uncontrollable ballots were placed in Box 3 and allegedly driven to Runbeck. In October 2020, over 100,000 filled-in ballots and over $13,000,000 were identified in unmarked rental cars, loaded at a Mesa residence, and driven to Runbeck's office. Deeds for Runbeck have been found. The strategy was for Hobbs to receive the Democratic nomination for governor and Fontes to run for Secretary of State. Both Hobbs and Fontes have Britney deeds, suggesting they are bribed recipients. Arizona being a border state with a large drug smuggling and human trafficking business, cartels invest to ensure officials keep their enterprise open. The fix for 2020 and 2022 started in 2017 with appointments of individuals bribed through a mortgage scheme and money laundering.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Illegal transfers have been made and provided to run back. And Jeff Allison, the phony deeds used in the scheme to move money to candidates are created by Britney. For profit and nonprofit packs are also created by Britney and used to move money for candidates. During the twenty two election, ballot scanners, printers at 70 at 70 precincts suffered changes to their printer settings despite being tested the night before the election. The changes in those settings were made through computer infiltration, not manually or by some never before before seen error. The uncontrollable ballots were placed in Box 3 and allegedly driven to run back. Witness information provided on October 2020 confirms that more than a 100,000 file filled in ballots and more than $13,000,000 were identified by some of our investigators in two unmarked rental cars. These vans were loaded with the ballots and cash at a private residence in Mesa and driven to run back office. The run back company, as you know, is operated by Robert Run back. We have found deeds for run back. This was a planned loss. Hobbs would receive the democratic nomination for governor and Fontes would run for secretary of state to replace Hobbs. The strategy appeared to have been planned. I have shown you that both Hobbs and Fontes have bricked what we call Britney deeds, evidencing a strong likelihood that they are bribed recipients. Now it may seem obvious, but I do feel that it's necessary to explain nonetheless. Given that Arizona is a border state and that drug smuggling and human trafficking is a billion dollar business, it would appear that having our elected and appointed officials ensure that the cartel enterprise remain open for business would be paramount. The cartel invest substantially to ensure that the right people are in key positions so as to further their objectives. The fix for 2020 and for 2022 started in 2017 with appointment to election positions of individuals being bribed through the mortgage scheme and through money is being laundered by the appointment of phantom individuals. The problems with these documents are many.
Real_RobN
Posted - February 13, 2026 at 6:44 PM
Saved - February 14, 2026 at 8:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I state that Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020, during the counting delay, implying ballots that never existed. I note 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots were sent and ask why 4.1 million were mailed for 2.6 million voters, suggesting backfilling. I urge passage of the SAVE Act; Election Day should be election day.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here it is: The single most damning piece of evidence of election treachery in the entire 2020 election: Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots one month after the November 3, 2020, election. “During the period when they needed extra time to count—which is now something they do in every election (they didn’t do it before; it’s new since 2020, and now they do it every time)—they picked up (i.e., manufactured) 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now, how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system one month after the election—after the fact—when you can’t prove they were in the system before the fact?” 📝 Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots. “If Maricopa has 2,595,272 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1 million mail-in ballots?” Backfilling. 📝 Pass the SAVE Act. Election Day is not election week, election month, or election year.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a sequence of figures regarding Maricopa County’s 2020 election and asserts inconsistency between tallies and ballots. He begins: there were 2,595,272 registered voters; 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and all counting; yet there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. He notes, “They called the election at 2,089,512 votes,” but emphasizes that the closing canvas shows a different number, counting the actual codes on paper rather than pieces of paper, yielding 1,923,693 numbers that show up. After post-adjudication, he lists key observations. By the time voting closed, 165,819 ballots were missing, which he states is 7.94% of the votes in 2020, and they could not explain where they were. However, about a month later in Arizona, a new total was produced: 2,086,959, still leaving 2,553 ballots missing as of that adjustment. He notes that Biden was said to have won by 10,500 votes. He then describes a process he calls the “time hack,” alleged to have been used to gain extra counting time—a practice he claims is new to 2020 and has continued in subsequent elections. He asserts that they “picked up, i.e., manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed.” He questions how ballots could enter the system after the fact if they did not exist beforehand, asserting this as evidence of manipulation. To support the claim, he cites machine outputs: “Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa,” while there were only 2,595,272 registered voters, yet 4,027,968 ballots printed. He states these numbers come directly from the machines and argues that no one scrutinizes them deeply enough. He asks why Maricopa would print 1,432,696 overprints, suggesting that to fabricate missing numbers, “backwards ballots” are needed to fill those gaps during the time hack. The argument continues that ballots must be suspended from hitting the bottom line—“don’t let them hit the bottom line”—and, once the numbers are known, could be replaced with whatever is needed. He implies that such suspended ballots are not present in either the pre- or post-audit tallies. Finally, he asserts that a proper audit would have all numbers cross-referencing across every manifestation; otherwise, the cross-referencing would reveal the inconsistencies. The overall gist is a claim of missing ballots, late adjustments, a large number of overprints, and a so-called time hack used to manipulate counts, with an emphasis on the need for cross-referenced auditing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Era Copa, even though they had 2,595,272 registered voters, and they said 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and every and all the counting, there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. Now think about that. They called the election at 2,089,512 votes. But at the closing of the books in the actual canvas, when you look at these numbers, not counting pieces of paper. Remember, I'm counting something different. I'm counting the actual codes on the paper. There are only 1,923,693 numbers that show up. That's called the pre. After they did their post adjudication, which was after the election, here's what you need to see. Number one, by the time they closed out voting, there were a 165,819 ballots missing. They could not explain where they were. That's 7.94% of the votes in 2020. They could not tell you where they were. However, mysteriously, after all of those days and a month later, a month later in in Arizona, they came up with the number of 2,086,959. Now please notice that's still 200 two two thousand five hundred and fifty three ballots missing. And to this day, they'll tell you that Biden won by 10,500 votes. Here's what you need to understand. In that process of time, the time hack where they needed extra time to count, which is now something they're doing in every election. They didn't do it before. It's new to 2020, and now they do it every time. They picked up, I e, manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system after the fact that you can't prove came into the system before the fact? Now remember, I showed you other ways to audit this and catch it. It's done. Well, here's how Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa. They only have 2,595,272 registered voters. They printed for Maricopa, 4,027,968 ballots. These numbers come out of the machines. They are what they are when they roll off the line. These are their numbers. It's nobody looks deeper enough. So why would Maricopa print 1,432,696 overprints? Why would they do that? Because if you're going to do this, if you're gonna make up missing numbers, you've gotta have those backwards ballots to do it because what happens is you're feeling you're filling in when it comes to the time hack. The time hack is what you need. You have to have two things. You have to be able to suspend ballots, meaning don't let them hit the bottom line. In 2020 with Sharpengate, in 2022 in Arizona, it was okay. We can't scan it. Drop it in box number three. You have to suspend them from hitting. And then once you know the numbers, you can put in whatever you want. That's why they don't exist in the pres. They don't exist in the post. Folks, when your audit's right, all of your numbers cross reference each other and crisscross. Regardless of how you find it, you should be able to find it in every single manifestation.
View Full Interactive Feed