reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses Russia of engaging in disinformation campaigns and planning false flag operations in Eastern Ukraine. When asked for evidence, the speaker refers to declassified intelligence information but does not provide specifics. The speaker emphasizes the need to deter Russia from carrying out these actions and states that making the information public serves this purpose. The other person questions the lack of concrete evidence and expresses skepticism. The speaker defends the credibility of the US government and stresses the importance of protecting sensitive sources and methods in declassifying information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thanks. Okay. Well, that's quite a mouthful there. So you said actions such as these suggest otherwise, suggest meaning that they suggest they're not interested in talks and they're gonna go ahead with some kind of a what action are you talking about?
Speaker 1: 1, the actions I've just pointed to. The fact What action? The the fact that Russia continues to engage in disinformation campaigns.
Speaker 0: He made an allegation that they might do that. Have they actually done it?
Speaker 1: What we know, Matt, is what we what I have just said, that they have engaged in this activity, in this planning activity. What but let me let me because because, obviously, this is not this is not the first time we've made, these reports public. You'll remember that just a few weeks ago. Oh, I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: You You Made what report public?
Speaker 1: If you let me finish, I will tell you what report we made public. We told you a few weeks ago that we have information indicating Russia also has already prepositioned a group of operatives to conduct a false flag operation in Eastern Ukraine. So that, Matt, to your question, is an action that Russia has already taken.
Speaker 0: An action that you say that they have taken, but you have shown no evidence to to to to confirm that. And I'm gonna get to the next question here, which is what is the evidence that they I mean, this is like crisis actors, really. This is like Alex Jones territory you're getting into now. What evidence do you have to support the idea that there is some propaganda film in the in in the making?
Speaker 1: Matt, this is derived, from information known to the US government. Intelligence information that we have declassified. I think you
Speaker 0: have Okay. Well, where where is it? Where where is this information?
Speaker 1: It is intelligence information that we have declassified.
Speaker 0: Well, where is it? Where is the declassified information?
Speaker 1: I just delivered it.
Speaker 0: But no. You made a series of allegations and statements.
Speaker 1: Would you like us to print out the topper? Because you will see a transcript of this briefing that you can print out for yourself.
Speaker 0: Not evidence, Ned. That's you saying it. That's not evidence. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: What would you like, Matt? I
Speaker 0: I would like to see some proof that you that that that that that that you can show that that
Speaker 1: Matt, you have been
Speaker 0: that that that shows that that that shows that the Russians are doing it. Ned, I've been doing this for
Speaker 1: a while. I know. That was my point. You you have you you have been doing this for quite a while. You know that when we declassify intelligence information, we do so in a means we do so we do so with an eye to protecting sources and methods.
Speaker 0: Not gonna fall. I I remember a lot of things. So where where where is the declassified information other than you coming out here and saying
Speaker 1: Matt, I'm sorry you don't like the format, but we have It's not
Speaker 0: the format. It's the content.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry you don't like the content. I'm sorry you I'm sorry you are doubting the information that is in the possession of the US government. No. I I what I'm telling you is that this is information that's available to us. We are making it available to you, in order, for a couple reasons.
1 is to attempt to deter the Russians from going ahead with this activity. 2, in the event we're not able to do that, in the event the Russians do go ahead with this, to make it clear as day, to lay bare the fact that this has always been an attempt on the part of the Russian Federation to fabricate a pretext.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But you don't have any any evidence to back it up other than what you're saying. It's like you're saying, we think we we we have information. The Russians may do this, but you won't tell us what the information is.
Speaker 1: And then when when you're That is the idea behind deterrence, man. That is the idea behind deterrence. It is our hope that the Russians don't go forward with this.
Speaker 0: Is you say, I just gave it to you, but that's not what
Speaker 1: You you seem not to understand. You seem not to understand the idea
Speaker 0: of the terms.
Speaker 1: We are trying to discern. The Russians are moving forward with this type of activity. That is why we are making it public today. If the Russians don't go forward with this, that is not, ipso facto an indication that they never had plans to do so. But
Speaker 0: But then it's unprovable. My my god. What is the evidence that you have that suggests that that that the Russians are even
Speaker 1: planning this? Matt, you need to
Speaker 0: I mean, I'm not saying that they're not, but you just come out and say this and expect us just to to to believe it without you showing a shred of evidence that it's actually true other than when I ask or when anyone else asks, what's the information? You said, well, I just gave it to you, which was just you making a statement.
Speaker 1: Matt, you said yourself, you've been in this business for quite a long time. You know that when we make information, intelligence information public, we do so, in a in a way that protects sensitive sources and methods. You also know that we do so, we declassify information, only when we're confident in that information. If you doubt if you doubt the the credibility of the US government, of the British government, of other governments and wanna, you know, find, solace and information that, the Russians are putting out, that is, that is for you to do.
Speaker 0: I'm not asking what what the Russian government is putting out. And and what do you mean? What is this supposed to be?
@itsmorganariel - Morgan Ariel
Woah. https://t.co/gsHLpM8WJ3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their experience in Israel and Palestine, highlighting the misconceptions about Hamas controlling Palestine. They explain that there are three different areas: the West Bank, under Israeli military rule; the Gaza Strip, controlled by Hamas; and Jerusalem, an international city where both Arabs and Jews live. The West Bank has been under military occupation since 1967, with checkpoints and political parties being illegal. Palestinians face severe restrictions and imprisonment for sharing photos or belonging to a political party. The speaker shares stories of attending a funeral where Israeli forces tear-gassed and shot rubber bullets at attendees, and another incident where an old man was shot at a checkpoint. They also mention the restrictions on Palestinians visiting Jerusalem and the ban on entering Gaza.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where he was talking about why Israel deserves to exist and stuff. After being there, man, holy shit. I feel like people have no idea. I didn't even know what the hell was going on until I went to
Speaker 1: did you like? Tell me give me your thoughts and your
Speaker 0: So everyone mistakenly thinks that Hamas, like, controls Palestine. That not true at all. There's PEL. There's 3 different areas that were drawn up with the original partition. It's the West Bank, which is totally under military rule by Israel, And then there's the Gaza Strip, which is like the open air prison, which they bomb the shit out of, like, every couple years, and Hamas controls that area.
And then there's Jerusalem, which is an international city center, Pell's, that both Arabs and Jews live in. But the West Bank has been occupied militarily since 1967, and it's complete martial law. There's checkpoints. Palace. All political parties are illegal.
You can't having a gun is, like, the least of it. You can't hold a flag. Palestine. You can't belong to a political party. You literally can't do shit if you're a Palestinian.
You just have to sit there and submit. And if even if you share a photo of someone who was, like, killed by an Israeli Palos Olger. You go to jail. And you go to jail for the amount of, like, months that What? Yeah.
Based on the shares and likes of the photo, they'll they'll penalize you more and put you in prison for Pelos longer and longer. I mean, I'll I'll just tell
Speaker 1: you one story. Put a photo on social media? Like, you put someone who
Speaker 0: died, and they'll be like, you're sharing a martyr and inciting people to, like, commit Palestine. Like, on behalf of Palestinians, you go to jail and and they put them in jail. There's 99.7% conviction rate. Kids are tortured. Kids are in prison.
It is Pell's. Absolutely insane. We went to the 1st day that we were there, we went to a funeral of some guy, some farmer who was shot by Israeli forces, the palace. And we went to the funeral. It was horrible.
You know, all the women are wailing and crying. And as we're leaving, the Israeli forces had set up a checkpoint right Pelos outside of this dude's house and started tear gassing and shooting rubber bullets. I got people who were simply attending the funeral just to punish people for attending the funeral. Pells. We went to another girl's house named Aya who's, who got shot in the vagina for Pell.
Peacefully protesting at some protest, and they shot 2 they shoot they shot 200 people that day. 1 guy next to her died. Another guy was paralyzed. Pells. They have a policy called shoot to cripple where they shoot guys in the dicks.
Yeah. Oh, it is fucking nuts, man. The West Bank is no joke. I thought that I was gonna die several times. We're at Pell's checkpoint going through Calandia, and there was this old man walking, like, clearly drunk or something and kind of, like, walking a little bit toward the checkpoint.
They started shooting at him. Pells. Bullets are ricocheting off the thing. And I, you know, my partner, Mike, who was an invading soldier of Iraq, was just like, We're gonna die. Like, they're shooting the sky.
There's bullets ricocheting. I it was absolutely insane. And as we go through the checkpoint, the soldiers, like, hey. Stay safe out there. Palestine.
And I was, like, yeah. When you guys are arbitrarily shooting people and and the person who was driving us had just told us that a couple months Pelos. Prior to that, some woman, Palestinian woman because you can't go to Jerusalem. Like, if you're a Palestinian, there's, like, barely any Palestinians who are even allowed Pells to go pray at the most holy site, the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. You can't go to the beach.
You're just completely constricted in a prison, and you can't Pells Travel. And and he was just telling us that months before we went through this checkpoint, someone was going through the checkpoint because they got a permit to go into Jerusalem, which is like a lifetime golden ticket, like Willy Wonka. Pells. And they're walking and they get and she just got executed. And then What?
Yeah. She just got executed. And she was bleeding out at this checkpoint, and her little brother tried to help her, and they Palestine. Shot him too. And they're, like, hiding the video of this.
Speaker 1: And this is just a
Speaker 0: day because they fucking hate Palestinians, and Palestinians are are animals to these people. It's sick, man. It's sick. PELOS. It's really, really sick, Joe.
And I I couldn't even get into Gaza. We were banned from going into this territory because I was told by the Israeli government that I was a propagandist and that I was, I was like an enemy agent, and so I wasn't allowed to go into Gaza. So Gaza's hell, but the West Bank is in under martial law, and everything's illegal. And you
@nunyabiznichky1 - Keri🇺🇸
This never gets old https://t.co/7z51kMduKq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Madam Speaker, the state of our union is strong. We are determined and confident in ourselves. America will never become a socialist country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: United States. Thank you very much. Madam speaker, I'm sure you in congress, the state of our union is Strong. Tonight, we're gonna do our resolve. Yourself good.
America will never be a socialist country.
@TakingoutTrash7 - CtrlAltDelete
Hahahaha brilliant 😆 https://t.co/xIFZXzdHkV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden urges people not to come, but then contradicts himself by saying "come together." The speaker seems to mock Biden's statement by repeating "come" multiple times. The transcript ends with the speaker saying they will come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do not come. Do not come. I'm gonna do it. Come on. You don't come.
Joe Biden said come. We must come together. No. No. No.
No. I'm gonna come.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Roseanne Barr and Tucker Carlson discuss their belief that society is being controlled by beings called the Nephilim. They argue that these individuals consider themselves gods and believe they are superior to humans. They claim that these "gods" do not care about the environment, their neighbors, or other people's children, suggesting they are not truly human. The speakers speculate whether these beings originated from another planet. They acknowledge that religious people often delve into such theories, but they personally do not know if the Nephilim are responsible for current events. They express concern about the deep deception and disregard for truth in society, emphasizing the need for open-minded historical inquiry. The video concludes with a mention of a related resource called "Ancient Angels."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have to see this clip to believe it. Roseanne Barr and Tucker Carlson are considering the possibility that society is being rung by the Nephilim. Yeah. Check this clip out, and be sure to watch to the end.
Speaker 1: The people who run our society consider themselves gods, and that's why they're not explaining.
Speaker 2: They think they're more than human.
Speaker 1: Oh, obviously.
Speaker 2: Yeah. They I I go they're not even human because humans care about their environment and their neighbors, and humans, care about, You know, other people's children Of
Speaker 1: course.
Speaker 2: And humans care about living things. Yes. But they don't do any of that. And he goes, because they think They're more than human.
Speaker 1: Oh, I noticed.
Speaker 2: That's why they wanna live for real. They think they're like royals in in a rarified Sphere of DNA or something above us. Like, did they come from another planet? You know, when you hear people talk, I can't either.
Speaker 0: But This is the podcast to speculate on it, though.
Speaker 2: Well, because some people some people say you know, a lot of religious people, they're into some deep Rabbit holes of things, and I don't know
Speaker 1: any Well, you can see where they are, though. I mean, I so speaking for myself, I have no idea what's going on. I don't know if this is the Nephilim or I I
Speaker 2: was gonna say
Speaker 0: I don't know. Here we go.
Speaker 2: That's what makes sense.
Speaker 1: I'm what I no. Let's just say heard. I said I don't know Right. Anything about that stuff. Okay?
I'm a very ordinary middle aged man who spent his life Following politics and theology. But I do know that whatever's going on is very deep. Yeah. I've spent my whole life around politicians and seen decisions get made, Interviewed people who run things, and what's happening now is qualitatively different, so different that it's not in the same category at all. No.
This is at all. No. This is hurting people for the sake of hurting them. This is lying for the sake of lying. This is as the devil hates holy water, they hate the truth.
You tell the truth about Anything. It almost doesn't matter what it's about. Doesn't have to be about the next election.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: It can just be about the about history, for example. Mhmm. Telling the truth about history. Why should that offend anybody?
Speaker 2: Really pissed.
Speaker 1: Where everyone's dead, and we can't, of course, change the past. So there's nothing really at stake for us now. Right? You would think people would welcome Open minded historical inquiry to get closer to what actually happened in whatever period or in whatever event. They hate that.
Yes, sir. Well, what what are you watching? You're watching someone who hates the truth because it's true, and there's no possible profit motive that is driving that. There's no political End that is driving that? They hate the truth because it's true.
Now we're in the realm of theology.
Speaker 0: Royal bloodlines, the Nephilim, history being lied Guys, people are starting to get it. If you want more people to get it, you should check out Ancient Angels and send it to a friend because, guys, it's all about this. Love you guys.
@RealSeq16 - Sequencer
Hahaha 😂🫢🫢🫢🤣👇 https://t.co/wRLOJHCBQY
Video Transcript AI Summary
An elderly person is seen leaving their residence, possibly for a vacation. The narrator criticizes their actions, suggesting they feel guilty about taking a taxpayer-funded vacation while the world faces various challenges. The person is described using derogatory terms. The narrator also mentions global conflicts, people heading towards the southern border, and struggles with economic policies. The person is depicted as slowly walking and being cautious on the stairs. Their policies are said to negatively impact the American people in relation to climate change prevention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been waiting here for hours hoping to catch a glimpse of this elderly jackass. At last, this repulsive scrotum like creature is emerging from his taxpayer funded den. Notice how this walking sack of testicles slowly waddles away from the cameras as if he feels guilty about going on a taxpayer funded vacation while the world is struggling with his idiotic decisions. As global conflicts rage, thousands of people head towards our southern border, and you struggle with bidenomics, this purple headed yogurt slinger, will be enjoying a vacation funded by the American people. Notice how the jackass slowly waddles up the stairs, careful not to fall on his ass and soil himself yet again.
As this grotesque old nutsack flies to a resort on a giant jet. His policies punish the American people in an attempt to prevent climate change.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been fortunate as vice president to see people of all ages and genders realize that being the first at something shows they don't have to be limited by others' narrow views of what is possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I have been fortunate and blessed to, during the course of being vice president, have many situations where it becomes clear to me that there are, you know, people of every age and gender, by the way, who see something about being the first that lets them know they don't need to be, limited by other people's limited, understanding of who can do what. Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth?
@DonnaPrissyrn1 - savage daughter
Video Transcript AI Summary
Boeing whistleblower Sam Saleipur faced threats and retaliation after speaking up about safety issues at Boeing. He mentioned manufacturing shortcuts on the 787 program affecting airplane safety and quality concerns on the 777 program. Despite raising these issues for over 3 years, he was ignored and told to stay quiet. This raises serious concerns about Boeing's practices and treatment of whistleblowers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This man right here is Boeing whistleblower Sam Saleipur, and every single person needs to hear what he has to say immediately, which before I go any further, let me just say this is for educational purposes only. Okay? And then I need everybody to share this immediately because this is really fucking scary. As you can see, Sam Staleypoor said at a senate hearing that he has faced threats and verbal abuse after he spoke up about safety issues at the plane maker. He was asked on Wednesday if there's a culture of retaliation against whistleblowers at Boeing.
Sam said in quotations, absolutely. And that the only reason that he left his job is because he had his attorneys. He said he filed via the whistleblower system before he spoke up. And then he added that he was once berated by his boss during a 40 minute phone call saying that they call you on your personal phone to let you know that they know where you live, saying that they know where you are and supposedly that they can hurt you. He said that we put band aid over band aid to resolve the problems and band aid over band aid doesn't cover it.
Maybe we need to consider some engineering fundamentals before detailing extensive retaliatory behavior such as preventing Sam from attending a doctor's appointment and asking for a loyalty pledge in writing. But this part right here, Sam said that my boss said in quotations, I would have what someone who said what you said in the meeting. Is that not sketchy? If it's not, just wait. I have more.
Appearing before the senate homeland security and governmental affairs committee's investigation subcommittee on Wednesday, Sam, who has been at Boeing for more than 10 years, stated that the company is supposedly, in quotations, taking manufacturing shortcuts on the 787 program that could significantly reduce the airplane safety. And Sam claimed that the problems concern changes and how different parts of 787 Dreamliner are put together. He stated in quotations, I found gaps exceeding the specification that were not properly addressed 98.7% of the time. He said of measurements and joints on the 7 80 sevens. And then in quotations, inspection of the data shows that the debris ended up in the gaps 80% of the time.
Then he went on to say that in quotations, I wanna make clear that I've raised these issues for over 3 years saying that he was ignored. I was told not to create delays. I was told to shut up. Sam, like I said, a Boeing qual claimed that after raising concerns over the Boeing 787, he was involuntarily transferred to the 777 program supposedly. At which point he raised quality concerns about that aircraft as well, alleging that engineers jumped up and down on panels to force them to fit.
What the fuck? This is absolutely insane. And let me just say that Sam is in perfectly good health at this moment in time. Okay? But, honestly, I can't say that I'm surprised.
But is that not terrifying? Is that not extremely sketchy? And is anybody aware of who Boeing really is? Who their top shareholders even are? Well, because let me tell you, it gets really interesting.
Once you dive into that rabbit hole, you might wish that you never had.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
LMAO 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/DlIuYqPB2t
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today is today, yesterday was today, and tomorrow will be today. Live in the present because the future will become the past just as today becomes tomorrow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today is today, and yesterday was today, yesterday. Tomorrow will be today tomorrow. So live today. So the future today will be as the past today as it is tomorrow.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
LMAO 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/x5tXwaXqXf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker nicknames a horse Obama because it's powerful, doesn't associate with black herds, and has a white horse following it. Another horse is called Tim Waltz, described as cuddly but not fitting in. The speaker repeatedly asks "Kamala, can you answer a few questions?"
The speaker concludes that there's only one real drunk running for president and sees no need to name a horse after him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would never name one of my horses after Donald Trump, but I do have one I nicknamed Obama. Why do I call him Obama? Because he's very powerful. He never hangs out with the black herds, and he always has a white horse sniffing his ass. And, of course, you all know, creepy Joe.
Always sneaking up and sniffing on me. Then I have Tim Waltz, big cuddly guy, but he just doesn't quite fit in with the rest of the herd. And y'all know Kamala. Kamala, can you answer a few questions? Kamala?
Kamala, can you answer a few questions? Kamala? Kamala, can you answer a few questions? Please, just answer a few questions. So there you have it.
There's only one real drunk, and he's running for president. I don't need to name a horse after
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
LMAO 😂😭😂😭😂 https://t.co/IxFy8mBYi1
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm very worried that Donald Trump might deport my mother-in-law, who entered the country illegally. She lives at 47 Street 4, Apartment D, New York, right behind the green apartment. I hope nothing bad happens to her. The gate is always open, and there are no dogs around. Apartment 4 is for sale.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald Trump won't, and I am very, very afraid that he might deport my mother-in-law. She entered illegally to the country, and she lives in at street 4, number 47, Apartment D, New York. And I'm very, very concerned. That's right behind the green apartment. Yeah.
I hope nothing bad happened to her. Me. The gate is always open. You don't have any dogs either. The street floor.
Number 4 is selling apartment
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
This is hilarious! https://t.co/MK695N1UlD
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am incensed to have a journalist talk from a position of ignorance. Do you want to tell me the health sector is well funded? You can't.
You are accountable to the population. You're marketing sanitizer. You walked out, so what? Do you want me to remove my jacket? Tell me when is that.
How do you contend with being thrown under the bus? You seem to be causing chaos. How are you coming to terms with embarrassing scenes at the burial? Your term expired, but it's renewable. We continue in office and organize elections. We are in the office legally.
I am not defending anybody; you are conflicted. Can we assume that the hunter is now being hunted? Why are you gay? What's this unwanted witness? What is your relationship with homosexuals and foreigners?
I'm a senior citizen, a child of God. Where is your seniority? You are weak in your backyard. The person we got was bought off. How many candidates have we gained? You lost in your backyard. If I went to hunt a small rat, but I have got the elephant, which is a better tank.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It incenses me to get a journalist like you to talk from position of ignorance.
Speaker 1: Now, honorable. Do you want to tell me that
Speaker 0: the health sector is
Speaker 1: well funded? No.
Speaker 0: You can't. I walk out.
Speaker 1: No. You shouldn't walk out. Where should I
Speaker 0: I will not contact you with a legal No.
Speaker 1: Honorable. You are accountable to the population. No. Thank you very much. Mister Magola, in simple terms, you're marketing the sanitizer.
Right? Yes. But before before That's what we wanted to know. Thank you very much, mister Magola. Thank you very much, Joel.
I'm, very in submissions.
Speaker 2: Don't go in
Speaker 1: honorable. Think so far. You walked out. So what? So what?
So Honorable Mafavi, did you say you don't wear short sleeve shirts? I don't Rather long sleeve? No. I wear short sleeve.
Speaker 3: Do you want
Speaker 1: me to remove my jacket unless you? You you you see that? Where? You want to see that? When?
Who is that? When is that? Who is that? Oh, when is that?
Speaker 3: Who is that? Who is that?
Speaker 1: Who is that? No. No. I want you to tell me when is that? Who is that?
Tell me when is that? We'll take a break. How do you contend with the reality that you are thrown under the bus? It takes quite some bit of, discipline and courage to speak to a general. You're retired, but you seem to be causing a lot of chaos.
Retired but worried. Good morning, counsel. And nice to have you with us. Good morning, Simon. It's a pleasure.
How are you coming to terms with embarrassing scenes at the burial in Masaka over the weekend? You find them embarrassing. Honorable Lydia Wanyoto, a member of the NRN central executive committee. As far as I gather, your term expired and you're in office legally. True or false?
Speaker 3: That's so true.
Speaker 1: But your term expired?
Speaker 3: It expired, but it's renewable. We continue in the office and we organize elections.
Speaker 1: So are you in office legally or illegally?
Speaker 3: We are in the office legally.
Speaker 1: When your term expired?
Speaker 3: Did not expire. We are in the office.
Speaker 1: Well, nice to have you. You come off as awkward in trying to. No, I I defend. My
Speaker 0: my friend.
Speaker 1: Defend the minister. Defend general side mister. I am. Clean.
Speaker 0: I am not. I am not defending. You are conflicted. I am not. You are conflicted.
My friend, I am not defending anybody.
Speaker 1: You you you are not neutral. We have with us, the lord mayor in the studio. Good morning.
Speaker 2: Good morning.
Speaker 1: Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 2: You're welcome, lord, mayor.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Can we assume that the hunter is now being hunted? With Fine. We bring in the studio this morning, one of the gay rights activists, mister should I call you mister? Pepe Julian Onzima. Yes.
Why are you gay? You are gay. In in the studio, I'm joined this morning by mister Morrison Raka Kamba, special presidential assistant on research and information. Thank you for joining us, Morrison. Thank you.
And good morning, viewers. And on my right is mister Wokulida Seva Gara, a media activist from the unwanted witness. Good morning.
Speaker 0: Morning, sir.
Speaker 1: What's this unwanted witness? What is your relationship with homosexuals like the president alleges and foreigners? Doctor Miriam Mathembe, a politician in her category, a woman activist Mhmm. And a preacher. Good to have you.
I told you I'm a senior citizen in this country. This activism thing,
Speaker 4: I don't want to hear it again. I'm a senior citizen, a child of God. Good evening. Good evening, viewers.
Speaker 1: Who baptized you that? What? Rank of a senior citizen. God. Where is your seniority?
In this brain, in the age, in the
Speaker 4: in the work I have done in this country, in everything.
Speaker 2: Supportive. But you lost. How many?
Speaker 1: You are weak in your backyard.
Speaker 2: I have not lost. No. No.
Speaker 1: If you could not find a candidate to run against
Speaker 2: not that.
Speaker 1: To run against
Speaker 2: the run against the run against the
Speaker 0: person we
Speaker 2: got was both off. The person we got was both off. Like many of them are still being bought off. That's a
Speaker 1: weakness.
Speaker 2: Okay. That
Speaker 1: means you you you're
Speaker 2: not confident enough. It is the new Uganda we want.
Speaker 1: Congrats next year. That's weak now. That's a weakness on your part.
Speaker 2: It is not. Okay.
Speaker 1: How many candidates Excuse me. Who were easily bought off.
Speaker 2: How many candidates have we now got across Northern Uganda? Because I did not kakunu myself in Nigeria. How many candidates have we gained? You lost From a no. No.
No. No. No. No. No.
How many Where
Speaker 1: is the
Speaker 2: Do you not dodge my question?
Speaker 1: You lost in your bucket.
Speaker 2: No. I didn't. I actually gained a lot.
Speaker 4: I lost What did you
Speaker 1: I lost okay. If I something.
Speaker 2: Excuse me. If I went to hunt, for example, this is an Yeri, a small edible rat, but I have got the elephant, which is a better tank.
Speaker 1: Where is the elephant?
Speaker 2: Which is a better tank.
Speaker 1: Where is
Speaker 2: the Which is a better tank. No.
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 2: This small this small loop, and a big elephant spread at core across Northern Uganda. Oh, my goodness.
Speaker 1: You come off as awkward in trying to no. I I defend My
Speaker 0: my friend.
Speaker 1: Defend the minister, defend general service.
Speaker 0: I am Clean. I am not I am not defend. You
Speaker 1: are conflicted.
Speaker 0: I am not You are conflicted. My friend. I am not defending anybody.
Speaker 1: You you you are not neutral in this.
Speaker 0: I I I Simon. Hey.
Speaker 1: I want I'm married. I'm the host. To you. Uh-uh. I'm the host.
You're the guest.
@Liberacrat - Liberacrat™️
*chirp* https://t.co/yc67iwkGus
Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist (summary approach)
- Identify the central people and relationships: speaker, daughter, baby, grandson.
- Capture the core actions and setting: daughter with her baby doing homework; waiting for the speaker to fetch them.
- Preserve key, distinctive phrases and claims exactly as stated.
- Convey the emotional tone: pride, affection, warmth, casual caregiving.
- Highlight any explicit requests or intentions (e.g., to fetch the children/grandson, to hurry with the bottle).
- Exclude repetition and filler; focus on essential points and conclusions.
- Translate if needed (not required here since the transcript is in English).
- Keep the final summary within 368-461 words.
Summary
Oh, y'all look at my babies. Baby bear. Okay. My daughter getting her no. Not because My daughter getting her stuff together, y'all. Y'all see her over there with her baby doing her homework. Ain't she ain't asked me to get them yet. I'm still waiting on that. Will you go ask me to get them? Oh, okay. I'm just making I'm trying to see because you've been doing good. No. No. No. Period. I'm so proud of her, y'all. My little babies. Okay. Look at this one. Wait. This is so cute. Like, for real, though. Let me get that bottle. Go ahead. She need to hurry up and get my grandson. He's not. Don't need not to.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, y'all look at my babies. Baby bear. Okay. My daughter getting her no. Not because My daughter getting her stuff together, y'all.
Y'all see her over there with her baby doing her homework. Ain't she ain't asked me to get them yet. I'm still waiting on that. Will you go ask me to get them? Oh, okay.
I'm just making I'm trying to see because you've been doing good. No. No. No. Period.
I'm so proud of her, y'all. My little babies. Okay. Look at this one. Wait.
This is so cute. Like, for real, though. Let me get that bottle. Go ahead. She need to hurry up and get my grandson.
He's not. Don't need not to.
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I'm done talking about COVID, and I'm done talking about SARS CoV two."
"For a hundred and ten years, we, the people of the world, have been lied to."
"We're a group of very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity."
"When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity."
"This is a criminal cartel."
"since its formation in the nineteen forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent."
"This is not an allegation."
"This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand."
"And they use a four step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the translators are gone, and the livestream is waning, which means that if we just listen to my colleague, Matthias, the best thing in the world would be to leave it to you, the people. Now it's up to you to share what clearly based on the cavernous emptiness we see in all of these spaces is only going to be heard if you share it. So it feels very appropriate that I should be the one with the quietest voice. But let's let that lion roar. Shall we?
I'm done talking about COVID, and I'm done talking about SARS CoV two, and I'm done for a very simple reason. For a hundred and ten years, we, the people of the world, have been lied to. We're a group of very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity. And I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite.
When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words. Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this.
This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit? Well, I'm going to tell you since its formation in the nineteen forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. And I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation.
This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand. And they use a four step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do, and then they deploy and profit from it. And in violation of fifth
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
During a discussion about government health care plans proposed in various forms, the host launches a show-of-hands question, asking attendees to raise their hands for visibility. The question is: Raise your hand if cover if your government plan would provide coverage for undocumented immigrants? After the show of hands, the host addresses Mayor Burujev directly with, "Okay. Let me start with you, mayor Burujev." He then asks, "Why?" The exchange centers on whether proposed government plans would extend coverage to undocumented immigrants, emphasizing audience input and prompting the mayor to explain the reasoning behind his plan’s stance on undocumented immigrant coverage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A lot of you have been talking tonight about these government health care plans that you proposed in one form or another. This is a show of hands question and and hold them up for a moment so people can see. Raise your hand if cover if your government plan would provide coverage for undocumented immigrants? Okay. Let me start with you, mayor Burujev.
Why?