reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@wilderpatriot - wilder😎🇺🇸
Interesting https://t.co/EE1L2efPDd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hamas, the second richest terror organization globally with a $1 billion annual turnover, has neglected the well-being of Gaza. Instead of providing clean water, they prioritize tunnel digging for smuggling, benefiting their leaders financially. Consequently, contaminated water causes 12% of childhood deaths in Gaza. Shockingly, most Hamas leaders don't even reside in the area, yet they profit from the organization's funds. It is crucial to free Palestine from Hamas and improve the lives of its citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hamas has an annual turnover of $1,000,000,000. This makes them the 2nd richest terror organization in the world. So why is Gaza one of the worst places in the world to live? Case in point, Instead of digging wells to provide clean water to their people, Hamas digs tunnels so their leaders turn a profit off smuggled goods. The result, 12% of childhood deaths in Gaza are due to contaminated is water.
So if they're not using all that money to take care of their citizens, where is it going? Into the pockets of Hamas leaders. And you know what the worst part is? Most of the leaders don't even live in Gaza. Free Palestine from Hamas.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
What. https://t.co/tQ1DxXXGoR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hamas invaded Israel on October 7th. Speaker 1 admits to not being well-informed about the situation and feels unqualified to comment. They express uncertainty about the accuracy of the information they have seen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hamas invaded Israel on the 7th October. What was your initial reaction to them?
Speaker 1: I didn't think they did today, I think so. Honestly, I I think I need to be a bit more clued up in, like, everything that's going on. So I feel like I'm not really qualified to answer that too, for sure. I mean, I'm not sure if I've I've seen any thing that show show you some that's actually happened of actually correct.
@intheMatrixxx - intheMatrixxx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the government plans to gain complete control of the Internet by using black people under the pretext of preventing digital discrimination. They argue that this aligns with the sixth plank of the Communist Manifesto, which advocates for centralization of communication within the hands of the state. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to subscribe for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I told you that the government was about to take complete control of the Internet? What if I told you that they were gonna use black people to do it? Under the guise of preventing digital discrimination, that's exactly what the government intends to do. The 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto, number 6 It says centralization of communication within the hands of the states, not only using black people to take control of the Internet. They're using black people to it?
There's communism. You've been informed. Subscribe for more.
@OffCyndisc - Cyndi
Interesting.. 🧐 https://t.co/UNL4lP1JDp
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to a government website, prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in America, after heart disease and cancer. Shockingly, around half of those who died had taken their medications correctly, following doctors' instructions. This means that even when people followed medical advice, they still ended up dying. Errors such as incorrect dosages or improper use of medications contributed to these deaths. It is concerning that prescription drugs, meant to help, can have such fatal consequences. This information is directly from a .gov website, and it is important to acknowledge these facts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government literally tells you that their prescription drugs are killing you. The 1st leading cause of death in America is heart disease, followed by the 2nd leading cause of death which is Cancer. Then guess what the 3rd leading cause of death in America is? They literally say, quote unquote, our prescription drugs are the 3rd leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe. I'm not making any of this up y'all.
This is on .gov website. Reads here, quote unquote, our prescription drugs are the 3rd leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe. Around half of those who died have taken their drugs correctly. Hold on. Let me take a step back y'all.
Did you read that correctly? Around half of those who have died took in their drugs correctly. So they did exactly like the doctors told them, and they still ended up dying. They would have been better they're off doing nothing, and not even seeing the doctors letting their body fight it off. Half died because of errors such as too high of doses or the wrong use of, you know, the medications, and I better not get deleted or banned for this video because I'm literally reading off .gov websites.
This is them saying this. They are literally saying our prescription drugs are the 3rd leading cause of death in America.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Interesting.. 🤔 https://t.co/vckUUNKp50
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mary Mahoney, a former Clinton White House intern, was killed in 1997. Vince Foster, a White House counsel, was found dead in 1993. James McDougall, a key witness, died before testifying in 1998. Seth Rich, a DNC staffer, was shot and killed in 2016. Shawn Lucas, an attorney, was found dead in 2016. These deaths have raised speculation about foul play and potential connections to political events, but official reports have not confirmed any wrongdoing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials. She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster, was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC.
He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors. Old he was serving his 3 year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas. And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougal his body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly 2 miles from the base of the trail he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shibe's death electrical accidental drowning, but he might have known too much.
27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer, Seth Rich, was shot and killed in DC this year. There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked e mails allegedly sent by D and C staffers, and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when he returned home on August 2nd. His death was reported classified pending the results of
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
Wow. 👇 https://t.co/gQh9QDODWi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Researchers are focusing on finding agents that can effectively kill cancer stem cells, which are resistant to standard treatments. Many cancer drugs shrink tumors but fail to eliminate the stem cells, which can make them more aggressive. A drug called Exovar is being clinically tested to target cancer stem cells, while curcumin, found in turmeric, has also shown promise. However, the cost of Exovar is significantly higher compared to curcumin, which is a more affordable and natural alternative. Other food items like resveratrol, genistein, sulforaphane, and EGCG have also been found to kill cancer stem cells. Despite this knowledge, conventional oncologists often overlook these options due to societal pressure and lack of awareness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Agents and items that kill cancer stem cells. This is very important.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Very, very important. Cancer stem cells, you know, colon cancer, the at the base of the crypt is a normal stem cell, normally speaking. And if those cancer if those normal stem cells become malignant for whatever reason, then you have then you're almost certainly dealing with a cancer stem cell. Cancer stem cell is highly resistant to treatment, to key to standard treatment. So there are big drug companies involved in trials, clinical trials of agents to try to get FDA approval to kill for to the agent to kill cancer stem cells.
So I was looking at a list, a paper that contain a list of these agents. At the top
Speaker 1: Right before the list. Before you say the list, I I wanna just establish something for folks that don't understand why this matters. It's because many, many cancer drugs and treatments will shrink a tumor, but they don't kill the cancer stem cells, Which are only, you know, less than 10% of a tumor, sometimes they're only 1% of a tumor. And and so it looks like, woah, this treatment totally shrunk my tumor by 90%. Like, wow, it's working.
Let's go to Chili's and celebrate, you know, happy hour. And The reality is is like, no. You those stem cells are now more aggressive. They're pissed off and they're and they're resistant, and they're gonna come raging Back because the treatment not only didn't kill them, but made them more aggressive. Right?
So the the the whole point is, like, you gotta kill the stem cells.
Speaker 0: Right. And drug companies have been racking their collective brains trying to come up with drugs to kill cancer stem cells. So Here's the funny thing. I was looking at this list yesterday of drugs, candidate drugs, substances to kill cancer stem cells. At top of the list was a drug called Exovar.
That interested me because I didn't I I didn't know but most of these other drugs are just in development. Nexovar is actually an approved drug for certain kinds of cancer now being clinical trial to kill specifically to kill cancer stem cells. Right? The bottom of the list was Curcumin, the yellow coloring natural coloring agent in turmeric, right? So the cost of of a good quality, curcumin, in a in what probably would be an effective amount would be about 60¢ a day.
Right? Literally. Right? To get Yeah. You know, in that realm.
Or if you took it for a year, $250. Look this up. And I look you can look this up at drugs.com or any other website. The cost of Nexovar, currently for the for its indications is over $20,000 a month. If you took that simple math if you took that for a year, you're looking at 250 $1,000 as opposed to $250.
That's sort of the gulf between the generic natural non toxic, you know, stuff that you could buy at a health food store or a food co op versus something that you only can get through the machinery of big pharma pumping this out. And then, of course, you know, with all the all the buzz around, now we found something to kill cancer stem cells, blah blah blah. But they've known for 10 years that curcumin and other natural agents kill cancer stem cells. They're actually the only thing pretty much they do. If you There are probably about 20 different items that kill cancer stem cells that are known in the laboratory and somewhat also in the clinic.
And of those, 10 of them are foods, food items, food derivatives.
Speaker 1: So why
Speaker 0: don't we
Speaker 1: What else?
Speaker 0: So resveratrol from red grape skins. Yep. Genistein from soybeans. Sulforaphane from broccoli and broccoli sprouts. I mentioned turmeric from cur from curcumin from turmeric, and EGCG from green tea.
Speaker 1: From black seed?
Speaker 0: Yeah. But the big five are the in terms of the certainly the quantity of research. There's about 10,000 journal articles that cover those those big five.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And then there are other minor ones like, maybe they're not so minor, but they're not as well researched. Like for instance, cinnamon, cardamom, pepper, some and by the way, how interesting isn't it that those things are sort of like traditional things in golden milk, in the the Ayurvedic formula and also you could put those in smoothies. You know there's a lot you can do with those, whether you take them as foods, you take them as supplement. But there's, aside from the holistically oriented doctors who are not that not that common in the cancer field or naturopathic oncologists. Who among, you know, whole of your your viewers was ever told this by a conventional oncologist.
They're they are either legally unaware.
Speaker 1: 0. The number is 0.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. And then there were a few, you know, heroes who are oncologists or doctors mainly treating cancer who are aware of this. But you know, what happens is if you push too hard, if you're an oncologist and you push too hard on this, you get a reputation as a weirdo. You get a reputation not as a sound person who was gonna move up the ranks of American Society For Clinical Oncology and of your department, but as, like, people are looking at you askance, like what's wrong with with that guy or that woman that they're suddenly so interested in garlic or ginger or green tea. And we have testimony from 2 top doctors in England who said that what they're they're big enthusiasts for ginger.
Ginger is another one that's that kills cancer stem cell. But they they are aware of the fact that, you know, there's it's embarrassing. It's a deep embarrassment to to them and to their colleagues if they admit this this sort of fascination with something that's not mainstream.
@RealSeq16 - Sequencer
Hahaha 😂🫢🫢🫢🤣👇 https://t.co/wRLOJHCBQY
Video Transcript AI Summary
An elderly person is seen leaving their residence, possibly for a vacation. The narrator criticizes their actions, suggesting they feel guilty about taking a taxpayer-funded vacation while the world faces various challenges. The person is described using derogatory terms. The narrator also mentions global conflicts, people heading towards the southern border, and struggles with economic policies. The person is depicted as slowly walking and being cautious on the stairs. Their policies are said to negatively impact the American people in relation to climate change prevention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been waiting here for hours hoping to catch a glimpse of this elderly jackass. At last, this repulsive scrotum like creature is emerging from his taxpayer funded den. Notice how this walking sack of testicles slowly waddles away from the cameras as if he feels guilty about going on a taxpayer funded vacation while the world is struggling with his idiotic decisions. As global conflicts rage, thousands of people head towards our southern border, and you struggle with bidenomics, this purple headed yogurt slinger, will be enjoying a vacation funded by the American people. Notice how the jackass slowly waddles up the stairs, careful not to fall on his ass and soil himself yet again.
As this grotesque old nutsack flies to a resort on a giant jet. His policies punish the American people in an attempt to prevent climate change.
@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo
Weird... https://t.co/WjxZRcUlGt
Video Transcript AI Summary
I arrived 2 hours ago and saw a chaotic scene with cop cars and buses escorted in. Lots of police around. Suddenly everything went dark, then a mysterious event happened. QAnon hinted at something happening in the night sky. I believe people in the White House were arrested.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Little rundown of what just happened. Let's see. I got here about 2 hours ago. See this shit, which that's pretty fucking crazy. That lasted for about 2 hours, and we watch all these fucking cop cars go on this big loop.
They do it, like, 4 different times. Pull off, go across the bridge over here. You can see them all with the sirens on going across the bridge. Come back, do the same thing. Throwing all that.
Three buses get escorted in. Lots of police just everywhere. You can see all around the city, fucking police. I watched that for the last 2 hours talking shit, and then it all goes dark. Gets back to normal while shit's pulling off, And then we get this shit out of fucking nowhere.
And this was one of the, it's one of the things that QAnon would post. He'd say, when it's all said and done, look up at the night sky or something something like that. You don't think they're throwing a party? They're not throwing a fucking Biden party. I just I'm telling you.
I just watched everybody in the White House get arrested.
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
Interesting. https://t.co/IgHrAU7ayH
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was born in Russia, grew up on the border of Russia and Ukraine, and have many Ukrainian friends who fled in 2014 when the military conflict began, which many Americans don't realize started long before the news covered it.
Also, Ukraine's current president, Vladimir Zelensky, was essentially elected as a joke. He starred as president in a series filmed by Ukraine and Russia together, planting the idea in Ukrainians' minds. Zelensky worked in Moscow as a comedian from a young age and would do anything for money, like dancing in pole dance shoes and participating in any party to get noticed. His presidency is a political marketing campaign, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict is heavily influenced by political marketing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Things about Russian Ukrainian conflict Americans don't understand. I was born in Russia, and now I live in The US. And I grew up at the border between Russia and Ukraine. I have a lot of friends in Ukraine, and a lot of them ran in 02/2014 when the military conflict started. In 02/2014, that's the first thing Americans don't understand.
Armed military conflict started years before. Just the news didn't show it. By the way, I'm not driving. Number two, Vladimir Zelensky, the president of Ukraine of right now, was elected basically as a joke. There was a series filmed by Ukraine and Russia together.
And the main character of the series is Zelensky, who is playing president there. So they implanted this idea into Ukrainian people's brains long time ago. And Zelenskyy lived and worked in Moscow as an actor. And he started his acting career as a comedian. And everybody I don't understand Ukrainians.
We all grew up watching him, dancing on the stage, being a comedian, filming in some small movies, and also the main line of his entire career as a comedian. Most of these guys who were fighting in this contest, comedian contest, it's called caveat. The guys that were there, they always dreamed to be in a high end society. That was the only way to get to the big stage. It's like America's got talents but for comedians.
So from very early stages of his career, showed very clearly that he will do anything for money. He was dancing on a pole dance shoes, going on the stage half naked, participating in parties, anywhere he could potentially be noted. So him becoming a president in the first place, it is a marketing campaign. And the situation between Ukraine and Russia is a conflict supported so much by marketing, political marketing.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Hmm … makes ya think 🤔 https://t.co/wJtNBiNBSt
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a 2005 Wikileaks cable, the Bush State Department defended George Soros' Open Society Fund against criticism in Lithuanian media. The State Department worried that articles criticizing Soros' fund, which supports Western-oriented NGOs, were influencing Lithuanian politicians and the president. The State Department viewed these articles as a smear campaign and mobilized resources to defend Soros' activities, suggesting a connection between Soros' network and State Department objectives.
The articles accused Soros of undermining political stability, linking his fund to the Lithuanian president, think tank directors, Transparency International, and academic leaders. They also alleged Soros' involvement in the impeachment of Lithuania's former president for interfering in privatization, and claimed Russian intelligence believed Soros worked for the CIA. The State Department contacted its "pawn network" in Lithuania, learning that the impeached president's faction sought to diminish the influence of think tanks and civil society institutions. The US ambassador organized an NGO roundtable to protect Soros. The Open Society Foundation controlled prosecutors and judges, and increased NGO participation in writing the penal code. The Soros Open Network also managed ethnic minority groups and public health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is just a good example of showing how deep the involvement is between George Soros and the State Department. This is Wikileaks two thousand five. So this is twenty years ago. The George Bush State Department, George Bush. So again, remember how I always talk about George Soros is a bipartisan phenomenon.
Even though it manifests as disproportionately funding Democrats, it advances international Republican interests. It's this deep linkage between John McCain and George Soros, the Romney, Liz Cheney wing, the Bush wing. This is Lithuania. The Lithuanian elves, the predecessor to NATO. Lithuanian daily attacks Open Society Fund civil society.
That's the name of the State Department cable here. So why is the Bush State Department trying to defend the Open Society Fund from being criticized in media all the way out in Lithuania? Here's Lithuania, Northeast of Poland, just West of Belarus, attached to the Baltic Sea. Let's read this. Here's what the state department was saying.
Summary, a week long continuing series of articles in Lithuania's Second leading daily newspaper, Respubblica, has attacked several western oriented NGO leaders whose organizations have received funding from George Soros' Open Society Fund. This is your red alert from the state department. Why does the state department care if some New York investor's philanthropy fund is being criticized? Because that's all it is. It's just a series of articles in a local newspaper criticizing Sora.
The state department is leaping to its defense. Do you think do you think there's a relationship here between what Soros is doing and what the state department wants to achieve diplomatically in the region? The attacks impugn the intentions of the NGOs. It's just articles. Free speech, man.
I thought the government's not supposed to mess with people's free speech, man. As it has criticized several western oriented, meaning the good guys, NGO leaders whose organizations have received funding from George Soros' open society fund. The attacks impugned the intentions of the NGOs and tar western oriented politicians, including the then president, as somehow influenced by foreign funding to act against Lithuanian national interests. So the Lithuanians are just trying to make Lithuania great again, And they're saying, hey. Our president is being funded by George Soros, and his political compadres are being funded by George Soros.
So why is it when you poke George Soros? The US Department of State squeals. Why is it when you poke Soros? The squeal comes from the state department. Anyone find that a little funny?
You know, if you poke my elbow, my left thigh doesn't start shaking. You know, if you if you poke my shoulder, my dog in the other room, hypothetically, doesn't feel pain. If you poke one thing and the other thing squeals, they're connected. We understand that similar articles have appeared in The Ukraine and other parts of the former Soviet Union, Central And Eastern Europe. Civil Society Leaders targeted by this newspaper claim it's a smear campaign.
The managing editor of this newspaper also advances his domestic political agenda through the articles as most of those attacked our supporters of the parliamentary opposition. The embassy has and will continue to buttress NGOs which play an important role in mobilizing the public. The US embassy in Lithuania, despite these attacks on George Soros, will continue to support George Soros' activity in the region. So the state department is backing the Soros NGOs and mobilizing its resources to defend Soros' control. Think about that.
When Soros is building up an asset network by funding everybody in the region, The state department wants that to happen. That means that Soros' pawns are being used for state department purposes. A big lie repeated. The big lie. This is back in 02/2005.
They're still using the same talking points. A big lie. The big lie. This dastardly newspaper criticizing George Storoz, the state department says, began the campaign. They use the same the same language that the censorship industry now uses.
Everything's a campaign. Everything can't just be a news article. It has to be a organized campaign. Seems to discredit the philanthropic the philanthropic activities of George Soros' fund in Lithuania. The article states Soros wishes to undermine political stability by funding civil society organizations.
The articles link the Open Society Fund Lithuania with the Lithuanian president. Think tank directors, Transparency International and academic leaders, the universities, the universities in Lithuania being funded by George Soros, as well as the puppet president there. The November article accuses Soros of undermining the impeached former president of Lithuania and funding the orange and rose revolutions in Ukraine and Georgia. Fascinating. Was Soros involved in impeaching?
Because this is what they do everywhere. Right? We see this everywhere now. They impeach Trump. They they impeached Imran Khan.
What happened with this, Roland Pasques? I'm curious. Found guilty by constitutional court of Lithuania removed from office. Man, Soros going after the court systems. Same way they're doing in Lithuania.
What were the charges? Interfering in a privatization transaction. So they were privatizing the economy the same way that Soros and the Harvard Endowment privatized Russia, and he was charged. The the president of Lithuania was impeached for interfering with the sell off to, Soros investors? Oh, that is please tell me.
Let's see. So let's get back to this. Later articles indicate that Russian intelligence services know Soros works for the CIA, and similar anti Soros articles have recently appeared in the Ukraine. So the state department is running cover for George Soros when he's being accused of doing working for the CIA in Lithuania. How funny is I mean, isn't that just hilarious?
This is a state department cable rushing to see what can the the US embassy in Lithuania can do to stop rumors about George Soros working for the CIA. The Republican state department, the George Bush state department. Open Society Lithuania is associated with people well and favorably known to the embassy. Open Society Fund Lithuania is associated with people well and favorably known to the US State Department Embassy. Official US statecraft, favorably known, including a director of the civil society institute.
Transparency International is probably an anti corruption, referring people they probably went after the Lithuanian president, the impeached one for corruption charges. The Open Society Foundation Lithuania board chairman is favorably known to the US embassy, the chairman of the board, the Voice of America associate, and their spooks in the universities. Fascinating. This newspaper that we need to destroy that's criticizing our Soros pawns in the area was founded in 1988. Today, the paper controls a media empire that enjoys a presence in many of the country's biggest markets.
Multiple motives. So the impeached president may also support the attack on Open Society Foundation. Bathroom passes, cutting glasses, squeaky asses. Fucking pussy. Why?
Well, when the parliamentary faction that's associated with the impeached president that appears to have been ousted in a state department Soros code, asks the state security department to investigate Soros' organizations and find out if these structures are usurping Lithuania's public sector, privatizing the publicly held assets. How funny is that? So the state department is worried. The state department is worried about an investigation by the state security services into Soros. This is the same reason while these rental riots have been popping off in Slovakia and Georgia when they try to pass an anti NGO law, like Hungary.
The EU court ruled that Hungary cannot enforce this domestic law. That's basically the same thing as our foreign agents registration act because they don't want people in Hungary or Georgia or Slovakia or Romania or Lithuania to know just how much of their own domestic economy is actually puppet money from the US State Department and USAID and George Soros. But, you poke Soros and the State Department squeals. Look at this. Darius Kualis, director of the Civil Society Institute, always those institutes, remarked to us the embassy.
So this is now the State Department making contact with local boots on the ground, their little pawn network in Lithuania, who told the embassy that the impeached, the couped out of power faction is interested in diminishing the influence of think tanks and civil society institutions in Lithuania. So the state department saw these articles about Soros and reached out to their civil society pawns. So what's going on here? Who's behind this? And the pawn said, it's the parliamentary faction belonging to the president that was just impeached, and they're trying to reduce all of our influence.
So why is it when you poke the think tanks, the state department squeals? And the civil society institutions, and the state department squeals. Because it's one big network, and it's in bed with the state, the state department. Transparency International and the civil society institute have been outspoken critics of the current government for corruption and promoting transparency in EU structural funds. Ah, the money.
He also believes the article seek to diminish the stature of US and western supported institutions in Lithuania. This is an attack on any Lithuanian who wants to make Lithuania great again. Supported institutions. They're puppet institutions. The primary thrust of the newspaper articles has been to malign Soros' intentions and activities by implying links to crime, terrorism, the CIA, and instability, including the current riots in France, craft an exaggerated perception of the scope, strength, and subversive nature of campaign to wield high level influence and manipulate public opinion.
How funny that? How funny is that? They describe the newspaper articles as a campaign. But when it's their pawns who are being attacked, they use scare quotes, a purported campaign. So a couple people writing a newspaper article series is a campaign, but the systematic funding of all the local politicians, all the local civil society groups, all the local think tanks, all the local universities is a purported campaign.
Do you see how dishonest they are? How funny is it that lie word campaign always gets me? Accuse the Soros network. It's a fund that funds a network. But notice how they have to use scare quotes.
You're a part of that network, state department. Otherwise, why are you on our we're paying for these state department officials to write this. You understand that? Their salaries come from us. If you pay me to administer American affairs in Argentina, and I spend my time rallying a campaign to protect George Soros' reputation in Argentina, do you need me on payroll?
Associate Soros with anti democratic practices, citing his role in the pro democratic revolutions in Ukraine and Georgia. The violent government overthrow suddenly gets whitewashed as a pro democratic revolution. Now here is a great once Soros is established as the enemy, pro western, because, again, they're contextualizing this as a struggle between US influence from the West and Russian influence from the East. That's who's going to control the local industries. That's who's going to control the, you know, Baltic Sea court access.
Who's gonna control the markets in the area. Once Soros is established as the enemy, pro western civil society leaders who have received money from the Open Society Foundation, and politicians who are linked to them are tarnished by association. The campaign. Suddenly, the scare quotes drop away when they're talking about the other side. Me?
A campaign? No. No. No. It's a a purported campaign.
Yeah. Right. But you, a campaign the enterprise and I have to meet Your government officials organizing this will likely bolster their distrust in civil society institutions and center right political groups, including the state department bad guy. So, again, it was a it was a left wing party that looks like it was cooed out of power, the labor party. So, again, Soros, it's apolitical.
It's like Soros cooed the left wing labor party out of power, installed a center right pro market group. So why does the state department care if these news articles bolsters distrust in center right political groups? Why is it when you poke the center right political groups in Lithuania, the state department squeals. Do you think they're connected? You see what I'm saying?
We're we're gonna watch the same thing play out in Romania, by the way. But let's just let's just let's just check this out. Okay? This is the State Department's good guy. So this State Department cable was in 02/2005.
It looks like he had just become president in 02/2004. It looks like he was president before the guy that Soros and the State Department appeared to have cooed out of office, Orlandis Paskis, so they put him back in. Paskis was later impeached and removed from office. Soon after, Ademkes ran again and won. He became a highly regarded moral authority in the state.
Well, it looks like he was backed by the State Department, who was doing everything in its power to stop public distrust in Ademkes and his conservative party. So, again, Soros backing the conservative party. Don't look at Soros as a left wing guy. I know it's disproportionately left, but if leftists went against the IMF, the World Bank, wars, funding to Ukraine, watch how quick Soros would support a Nikki Haley conservative party. Lickety split.
Do you understand? This is like Bill Crystal being a Republican, but then tactically supporting Democrats when a nationalist leader like Trump gets to power. So again, you know who the state department is trying to keep in power, and you're watching them use Soros, the state department using Soros, to keep the bond in power. Opensocietyfoundations.org, 2 thousand. The law program reinforced reforms to the criminal justice system.
So again, Soros protected by the state department, controlling the prosecutors and the judges, and increasing participation of NGOs to write the freaking penal code for the country. Every single one of these is like a CIA program to control the internal politics of Lithuania. That's why it's being protected by the State Department. Okay? It's a covert influence operation.
Controlling the educational sphere, economic reform, information, media, youth programs. I see Romania here. This is in February. Romania's ethno cultural diversity is one of its greatest riches. Two important resource centers, one focusing on the Roma, the gypsies.
The Open Society Foundation Romania is the pivotal resource center for the Soros Open Network. Network? Wait. I thought it wasn't a network. Why are they just calling it a network, the Soros network, but the state department refuses to acknowledge it's a network?
Put scare quotes there. It's literally called the Soros open network. They lie about everything, literally everything. Okay. So they're they're they're controlling these ethnic minority groups.
Okay? They love doing this. It's one of these cleavages. You can get them to riot. You can cause social tensions.
You can get them to vote with you politically in a block by paying their leaders, their community leaders. You can bribe the whole network by having it juiced down. Okay. So they're controlling these ethnic relations. It's gonna be the street muscles, it's be the political blocks, controlling the public health system, independent people, economic activities, $10,000,000 in in the year February.
So look, they even russugated it back in February. One of our local professors who's a victim of this campaign, news articles criticizing the Open Society Fund told us he believes the series is motivated by foreign interests. Read Russian funds. Our response, solidifying transformation. The ambassador will hold an NGO roundtable.
So our response to this is a roundtable with the NGOs to protect George Soros. It's gonna get all the NGOs to protect George Soros against these attacks. The ambassador, the US ambassador, the Republican US ambassador of Lithuania, probably making 200 k a year organizing an NGO roundtable in response to local news outlets criticizing George Soros funds from controlling the local politicians and universities. The embassy will continue to support civil society or pawns. Okay.
Alright.
@TheEmmapreneur - E M M A ✨ K A T H E R I N E
Umm… what?! https://t.co/nhI8QjV9eh
Video Transcript AI Summary
If the speaker hadn't intervened, Ali would have been killed and used for Muti, a form of witchcraft. Muti involves using body parts for luck. Police told the speaker that if Ali had been killed, she would have been used for Muti. Her head would have been boiled until shrunk and then dangled from a taxi mirror.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I hadn't done that, Ali Ali would have well, I would have been just been killed outright. Ali, they would have turned into Muti. You know, they're eating her. You know? Hannibal's?
Well, they don't eat they they use the child for Muti. The that means if you eat a finger or something, then you then you have luck for life, you know. You you know, you must have heard of that, surely. Like, sexuality stuff, like, is that witchcraft? When you go back in time, you know, the Vikings and all the people before that, you know, the different ages in which we live, you know.
So what would have happened if they The police said to me that if they had killed her, they would have used her for Muti. Muti, it's medicine, witchcraft. I'm sure you've heard of that. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. So she would have been a her head would have been dangling from a taxi mirror, you know. They boil their head until it's shrunk. They hang it from a taxi mirror.
@AtRealBen - ⱤɆ₳Ⱡ ฿Ɇ₦
well well well… https://t.co/t0XiGfodZ9
Video Transcript AI Summary
One friend suggested questioning whether the media is fully truthful about Israel, noting that we've pushed back against the media on COVID, lockdowns, Ukraine, and the border. The friend asked, "Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel?" and added, "Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years." The speaker then points to a claim people make: "So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse." This framing links media credibility debates across issues to perceptions of Israel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay. Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse.
@VladTheInflator - Darth Powell
Interesting https://t.co/JFZOXRpFjJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi. My name's John. And despite how upset I seem sometimes, I have no intention or desire to take my own life. So a plane a private jet took off about twenty minutes, maybe less, after Charlie Kirk was shot yesterday. This is the jet, N888KG. Do you notice how it's only made literally one flight this entire year? One flight. That's the only listed flight. Here's the website for the company it's registered under. Looks like they're scrubbing that shit. Here's the building where the company is registered. There's all the companies associated with it. Here's proof that the registration is real. Here's the distance between the airport where the private jet took off and where Charlie was shot. It's walking distance. And here's the guy who owns the jet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. My name's John. And despite how upset I seem sometimes, I have no intention or desire to take my own life. Now let's talk about this fucking plane. So a plane a private jet took off about twenty minutes, maybe less, after Charlie Kirk was shot yesterday.
Okay? People caught it. This is why they're gonna take the Internet away from us. But while we have it still, let me show you. This is the jet, N888KG.
Do you notice how it's only made literally one flight this entire year? One flight. That's the only listed flight. Here's the website for the company it's registered under. Looks like they're scrubbing that shit.
Here's the building where the company is registered. Okay? There's all the companies associated with it. Again, here's proof that the registration is real. Yada yada.
Here's the distance between the airport where the private jet took off and where Charlie was shot. It's walking distance. And here's the guy who owns the jet. Okay. Have fun.
