reSee.it - Related Post Feed

listen_2learn
Posted - December 19, 2023 at 10:31 PM
Saved - December 19, 2023 at 11:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: A leaked video shows federal bureaucrats discussing ways to undermine the Trump administration. The post suggests that the federal government should be reformed and decentralized. Post 2: One of the individuals in the video is described as a climate activist who has relocated to Portland and is now involved in global and communist ideologies. Post 3: (No information provided)

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

This is the video from a couple of years ago that leaked. It’s the federal bureaucrat partisan dummies talking about how to destroy the Trump administration from the inside. The federal government must be gutted and decentralized.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Government workers discuss the actions and decisions within their control. They emphasize the power of noncooperation and leaking information to journalists and activists. They also mention the importance of creating parallel structures and being in touch with civic and grassroots groups. Slowing down bureaucratic processes through cost-benefit analysis and leaking documents is highlighted as an effective tactic. The conversation touches on the risks and consequences of these actions, including the potential loss of jobs or legal implications.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about what actions and decisions are in your immediate sphere of influence as, somebody who works in the government. I'm a management and programs analyst. Speaker 1: I work in the national security community. Speaker 0: I spent three and a Speaker 2: half years, as a contractor at DHS HQ. Speaker 3: If you read the mainstream press, like, they all have signal accounts. Text them, leak everything you can. The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me To be the source of the leaks. Speaker 2: Groups on the outside being able to show, solidarity with federal workers. Making sure that we're naming What is happening is a coup. Speaker 0: Totally agreed. In the shutdown, BP conversations that I've been having, and that's not on the federal side. We, Also, we're often saying that Speaker 1: you call Speaker 0: it a coup. It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not. Speaker 2: President Harry s Truman famously said, I thought I was the president, but when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing. So the bottom line with this is that we all, as Ordinary people, and as federal workers have power. If masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power. Bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar. And, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process. They know how to speed things up. They know how to slow them down. They have access to critical information about policies that are being considered and implemented. They can participate in an internal decision making. They can provide or deny knowledge and expertise that those, at the top of the bureaucratic, totem pole, need. It ultimately comes down to individual decisions and personal choice. Deciding what to do or what not to do is a very personal decision. It's based on context. It's based on your rank, on your tolerance for risk, on your preparation and frankly, where you sit in the federal, federal bureaucracy. We're talking about the range of different Hactics. We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission. And another act of commission, albeit Highly, you know, risky. And there are a number of, great downsides is leaking. So leaking information about pending or actual policies with journalists, with activists, influential people on the outside. So another act of, of Commission is creating parallel structures or self organizing units. So organizing in the office place, in the workplace. Speaker 1: As an attorney in the federal government, I I am finding the chat suggestions very interesting, and I just do wanna remind people that we lose our Yeah, this is federal employees if we strike. Speaker 4: And there's been a little conversation going on here, for example, about Black Lives Matter and how that is an example of a non partisan Some political statement, I guess that's been previously litigated. But whether or not you do a misdemeanor or an infraction on federal or on public property, really doesn't affect, most of the jobs, that you would be considered for. Just just as a sideline note. Speaker 1: As an attorney, I think I'm a we we're highly, you know, that's one of the things we have to be careful Speaker 2: We just say this is also the importance of being in communication with and in touch with groups, civic groups, grassroots groups that Are preparing people for the possibility that red lines may be crossed, that, you know, there that the election goes sideways. You know, so everything from choose democracy to hold the line, to shut down, we count on us. I listed a few of those, in the slides earlier. But, you know, they're the ones who are really in the vanguard of helping people think about, interpret red lines, and think about different actions that can be taken well beyond, kind of, street protests and demonstrations, but kind of sustained organizing an action. Speaker 4: What does that look like in practical terms to put, you know, to slow the gears down in some ways or another? Speaker 1: At the Department of Labor, it takes the form of, Several rounds of the cost benefit analysis for a new regulation and when, when the numbers were when people were cheating on the numbers, a copy of that draft got leaked, to the Data Labor Report, and it got published, and it got sent to a congressperson. And the office of inspector general opened an investigation on who was cheating on the numbers. So again, that's sort of a combination of tactics. It's it's It's making really the paper trail. It's making sure that that document got out to someone who could make use of it and then Congress getting the Office of Inspector General involved. It was really a way to stop that thing just in its tracks, and it worked really well.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

One of the loons is a climate cultist. She moved to Portland is now working at the intersection of global and communism.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://www.earthadvantage.org/news/former-department-of-energy-staffer-madeline-salzman-jo.html

Former Department of Energy Staffer Madeline Salzman Joins Earth Advantage as Head of Strategic Partnership Earth Advantage is pleased to announce the addition of industry veteran Madeline (Maddy) Salzman to its senior management team as Head of Strategic Partnerships. In this role she will act as liaison between Earth Advantage and key national, state and local government entities to support the development of equitable building decarbonization policies. earthadvantage.org
TrashDiscourse
Posted - January 14, 2024 at 10:43 PM
Saved - January 24, 2024 at 1:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I gained access to documents from the Sunrise Zoom Calls investigation, including a "Facilitator's Guide for Federal Workers." This guide enables Marxist employees to hold training sessions easily. The document promotes equity and inclusion, suggesting alternatives to clapping and providing a suggested timeline. You can find the full 25-page packet here.

@TrashDiscourse - TrashDiscourse

Part of @Millie__Weaver investigation into the Sunrise Zoom Calls, we got access to their documents. One of the documents is a “Facilitator’s Guide for Federal Workers” This is a full document that enables Marxist employees inside our government to hold “training sessions” https://t.co/JdPOAnVpXu

@TrashDiscourse - TrashDiscourse

As you see here it’s made easy to hold these sessions. https://t.co/pZ0iF2jLuU

@TrashDiscourse - TrashDiscourse

It’s well thought out for equity and inclusion. Remember the DSA video? Don’t clap, but snap fingers or wave hands instead of clapping 😂🤣 https://t.co/PEaMePHyEZ

@TrashDiscourse - TrashDiscourse

Here’s their complete suggested timeline https://t.co/uk34pp38qX

@TrashDiscourse - TrashDiscourse

Full 25 page packet here https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M9IJmUgKY0elW3wSGGu2hs6MBcEHWLWS/view

Millie__Weaver
Posted - January 24, 2024 at 2:52 PM
Saved - January 25, 2024 at 3:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A network of radical Marxist bureaucrats conspired in secret meetings to use their positions in the US Government to enact their political agenda. The participants included far-left protest organizers, federal bureaucrats, and even a trans porn star turned protest activist. They discussed tactics such as leaking information, wearing symbols, and creating parallel structures. They also expressed concerns over Schedule F and planned to reject Trump's appointees if he contested the election. Internal documents distributed during the meeting provided resources for federal worker activism and evidence of their involvement in leaks. They also discussed grassroots election protection strategies, including voter registration, printing ballots, and counting/recounting ballots.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Thread: 1. Far-Left US Government Employees Conspired To Subvert President Trump, Gum Up Bureaucratic Processes, Strike, and Leak To The Media A network of radical marxist bureaucrats conspired in secret meetings, plotting how to use their official positions inside the US Government to enact their political agenda.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Days before the 2020 election, a secret Zoom meeting titled "Feds For Democracy" took place between a group of subversive Marxists inside the US federal government w/ far-left protest organizations. Hosted by "Democracy Kitchen" and "Feds For Democracy" and in participation w/ leftist affinity groups, like ShutDownDC.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

3. At its peak, about 150 participants were on the call. The Hosts & Speakers: https://t.co/jI5paE1DUy

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

4. Participants backgrounds ranged from being far-left protest organizers, green energy corporate employees to federal bureaucrats, Air Force Lt. Col., National Security advisors, and those who worked in White House during the Obama Administration. And even a trans porn star turned protest activist. Participants Identified:

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

5. Secrecy "What's learned in the room can leave with you, but what is said in the room stays in the room." Participants are advised to "take those discussions offline" if they what to talk about high risk actions they want to take. https://t.co/t594FjgJFC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Please only share information about yourself that you're comfortable with. You can keep your camera muted and introduce yourself in a way that makes you feel at ease. When discussing potential actions, it's best to speak hypothetically to avoid any misunderstandings. If you want to discuss specific actions or higher-risk topics, exchange contact information and use the secure messaging app Signal to communicate privately. This will ensure that sensitive information remains confidential.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a couple of notes on your own safety and the safety of others that you are working with, tonight, Please disclose only as much information about yourself as you're comfortable with. As I mentioned earlier, feel free to keep your camera muted. Feel free to change your your name when you're introducing yourself in breakout. Use your name if you want, your agency or department if you want, or Talk about what your favorite meal is. Find a way to introduce yourself that you're comfortable with. If you're talking about, actions that you might take yourself. I encourage folks to speak hypothetically. If someone were considering doing x, What what might the problems be? That way, there's no implication that that's actually something that you've said you're going to do. Just keep things hypothetical. And then if there's a discussion emerges, especially in the breakout group, of some very specific actions that you wanna take or something that might be higher risk for people in your group, definitely, get each other's contact information and form a signal group to talk about that. Signal's an app that's very secure end to end encryption. It's a good way to communicate about anything that you wouldn't want to get out, that might get you in trouble with your boss. So take take those discussions offline, there'll be a chance at the end of the breakouts to exchange contact information with each.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

6. Icebreaker "Chat Storm " "A lot of folks looking for solidarity, camaraderie, hope, protection, like-minded people." -Laura Adams

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

7. The Election Is At Risk "..there will likely be disagreements about which ballots should be thrown away and for what reason" https://t.co/3qrdxsHCYf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the risks surrounding the upcoming election. They highlight Donald Trump's refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power and his fear mongering about mail-in ballots. The speaker mentions that the election results may not be finalized on November 3rd, leading to potential disagreements and court cases. They emphasize the importance of taking Trump's statements seriously, particularly his comments about getting rid of ballots and questioning their manipulation. The speaker concludes by mentioning the significance of believing authoritarian figures when they make statements.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So a high level issue. The election is at risk. This is due to a number of factors. Donald Trump has not committed to a peaceful transfer of power. Instead, there's been significant fear mongering about risks associated mail in ballots, which has been rampant. The election results are unlikely to be finalized on November 3rd, which is perhaps different than what we're used to in previous years. There will likely be disagreements about which ballots should be thrown away and for what reason. We've seen lots of, court cases happening in this in many swing states around the country, and there's a chance that certain decisions around the election will take place in the courts. So there's a lot going on right now, and As we're all aware, the election is now less than a week away. So next slide. So, I wanted to pull out a few quotes, of what Donald Trump has said on the election. I think It's important to, listen to what these leaders are actually saying and to take them seriously. One of The biggest risks I think we have is to assume people are joking or or speaking in a way that is not serious for them, but We saw in September, Donald Trump saying that, he's complaining about the ballots. The ballots are a disaster. Get rid of the ballots, and you'll have a very peaceful there won't be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation. And if it's a fair election, he's on board. But, if He sees that ballots are being manipulated. I can't go along with that, and that means you have a fraudulent election. And this is really just setting up the ideas around, well, who who is saying ballots are manipulated and in web ways. And there's a quote that maybe one of the next speakers will talk about where, when an authoritarian says something, you should believe them, and I think that's important here.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

8. Thwarting A Coup Isn't A Coup "It is not a coup to act against a government or officials who are trying to prevent a legitimate transfer of power. We believe that every vote must count, we must count every vote" https://t.co/41XtkKQlpz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Refusing to honor the results of a fair election is a coup, but acting against a government that hinders a legitimate transfer of power is not. Every vote should be counted, and we must protect democracy. It's crucial to focus on what we know is right amidst different narratives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Speaking of coups, I also wanna, be upfront that, it is a coup to refuse to honor the results of a free and fair election. It is not a coup to act against a government or officials who are trying to prevent a legitimate transfer of power. We believe that every vote must count, we must count every vote, and we must take action to protect democracy. Forwarding a coup is not the same thing as a coup. It's protecting democracy. There's going to be a lot of narratives around what is happening, what should be happening, what do things mean and I think it's really important to be centered in what any of us know is right. Next slide. So I know that's a lot upfront, but really important to, make sure we're on the same page on. So I wanna also

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

9. We Have Power & Responsibility "We have power and responsibility as federal workers... rules have meaning because we decide they do, we decide to enforce them." - Maddy Salzman https://t.co/UV90qzim8j

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

10. Tactics Depend On Your Role "One important aspect is to think about what are the tactics you should take depending on your role. There's different types of roles in the federal government, and that means that there's different roles that could be appropriate for you to take" https://t.co/BDx7l9zLp1

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

11. Ideas For Fed Organizing "We should continue conversations on direct action and how we can stand in solidarity with others, especially protestors in other communities."

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

12. Maria Stephan "It is really great to be with you all in solidarity during this critical junction for our country." -Maria Stephan "I have worked in the US government. I worked in the State Department for over five years." -Maria Stephan

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

13. Quoting Gene Sharp "I want to start with this quote by Gene Sharp, who's one of the pioneers in the field of nonviolent action, just to get a little bit on what power you all have as individuals and as federal workers." - Maria Stephan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gene Sharp, a pioneer in nonviolent action, highlights the power individuals and federal workers possess. Rulers rely on people to collect taxes, enforce laws, manage transportation, allocate funds, and perform various tasks. If people refuse to provide these services, rulers would lose their ability to govern. President Harry S. Truman acknowledged the influence of bureaucrats, stating that he couldn't accomplish anything without them. This emphasizes that both ordinary people and federal workers hold significant power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna start with this, quote by, Gene Sharp, who's one of the pioneers in the field of nonviolent action. Just to get a little bit at what power you all have, as individuals and as federal workers. So Gene Sharp said, in the politics of non violent action by themselves. Rulers cannot collect taxes, enforce repressive laws and regulations, keep trains running on time, prepare national budgets, direct traffic, manage ports, print money, repair roads, keep markets supplied with food, make steal, build rockets, train the police and the army, issue postage stamps, or even milk a cow. People provide these services to the ruler through a variety of organizations and institutions. If people would stop providing these skills the ruler could not rule. And just as an added insight on this specifically focused on bureaucrats. President Harry s Truman famously said, I thought I was the president, but when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing. So the bottom line with this is that We all as ordinary people, and as federal workers have power. Next slide, Laura.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

14. Gene Sharp - How To Start a Revolution "This is a technique of combat, it is a substitute for war and other violence. https://t.co/NhcnEosnVb

Video Transcript AI Summary
This combat technique is a non-violent alternative to war. It has been translated into over 30 languages and is practiced on all continents except Antarctica.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a technique of combat. It is a substitute for war and other violence. We don't know quite how it's read, but it certainly did into Thirty some languages in different parts of the world on all continents except Antarctica.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

15. Subverting the "Pillars Of Support" "If people in these pillars of support withhold or deny their consent and cooperation...no ruler can stay in power.." https://t.co/LldEvI15hf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Power is dispersed in society and concentrated in pillars of support, which are organizations and institutions that provide the necessary resources for those in power to stay in power. These pillars consist of ordinary people who contribute expertise, labor, and buying power. If people in these pillars withhold their cooperation and engage in nonviolent tactics like protests and strikes, rulers cannot maintain power, as seen in cases like the Philippines, Serbia, Ukraine, and Sudan. The loyalty of individuals within these pillars varies, with those closer to the center being more obedient. The goal of effective people power is to shift loyalties and bring people from the center to the outside. Bureaucracy is a powerful pillar, with federal workers having knowledge and influence over policies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So power is actually dispersed across society and concentrated in what we refer to as pillars of support. So these are organizations and institutions that provide a government or other power holder with the power, with the skills, the knowledge, the labor, the know how that they need, to stay in power. And these pillars of support are made up of ordinary people like you and me who provide Expertise who provide specific forms of labor, who provide buying power. So if people in these pillars of support Withhold or deny their consent in cooperation. Meaning, they stop obeying, they stop cooperating, And they engage in protests, boycotts, strikes, a whole host of other nonviolent tactics That if masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power, even if they really want to, and even if they use a lot of repression. And, ultimately, this is how civil resistance has removed even dictators from Power in places like the Philippines, Serbia, Ukraine, Sudan, other places around the world. And the other idea is that within these pillars of support, You can think of it as kind of a series of concentric rings. And, you know, at the center is kind of the power holder And people who are, you know, in the rings around the power holder have varying degrees of loyalty to the center. So, you know, those who are maybe closer to the center and this uses the example of, you know, the the military kind of starting with generals and going out colonels, foot soldiers, but you think can think about this in terms of the bureaucracy as well, kind of going through the different hierarchy, That the people who are maybe closest to the center are more likely to obey, less likely to challenge authority. But as you go out, to those outer rings, people are going to have less loyalty, to to the center, to the power holder. And these people are really key allies. And ultimately, you know, the goal, in, you know, in effective People power is to bring people over to your side, to get them to shift loyalties, to get them to move from the center to the outside. And as we know and as Maddie, you know, laid out so nicely, bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar. And, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process. They know how to speed things up. They know how to slow them down. They have access to critical information about policies that are being considered and implemented. They can participate in an internal decision making. They can provide or deny knowledge and expertise that those, At the top of the bureaucratic, totem pole meet

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

16. Acts of Commission and Omission "And another act of commission, albeit highly risky, and there are a number of great downsides, is leaking"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Acts of commission in opposing threats to democracy include asking specific questions, wearing symbols of unity, creating a paper trail, leaking information selectively, and forming self-organizing units. Acts of omission involve refusing loyalty oaths, promoting internal debate, and slowing down work. A labor strike or walkout is a higher-risk option. These actions aim to challenge unethical or unconstitutional orders and protect the integrity of elections. It is important to exercise caution and consider potential legal consequences when engaging in these acts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission. So acts of commission are things that you do that you either are not expected to do or that are contrary to, you know, what the opponent, in this case, the enemies of democracy, want you to do. So in this case, you know, an act of commission would be, you know, as federal workers asking very specific questions, exerting your voice in the workplace, joining with colleagues to make the case for why something may be illegal or unethical. Another act of commission is the wearing of symbols which seems like, you know, a small or a minor thing but it's actually really powerful When lots of people are showing unity and solidarity by wearing symbols, symbols can be nonpartisan. They can be pro democracy And part of me thinks that symbols may be an important way for feds to show support and solidarity around democracy and the integrity of our election after, November 3rd. Another act of commission is creating a paper trail. So producing a very clearly written account of the problem in question and the actions, that are taken to address it. And this is really, I think in this moment where there may be uncertainty conflicting messaging potentially illegal orders for civil servants federal workers to engage meticulous documentation, to challenge the policies or the directives that they deem unethical or unconstitutional particularly when the orders are given verbally rather than in written form. And another act of commission albeit highly, you know risky and there are a number of great downsides is leaking. So leaking information about pending or actual policies with journalists, with activists, influential people on the outside. But this, you know, really should be used very judiciously only on truly significant matters because most disclosures outside of formal internal whistleblower are at minimum a violation of contractual duty, and they may put leakers, at significant legal risk. And, of course, if information is classified, employees can be fired or criminally prosecuted as Sarah may talk a little bit about. So another act of, of commission is creating parallel structures or self organizing units. So organizing in the office place, in the workplace. This is particularly important, in the event of abuses of power unethical activity to be able to self organize, make decisions without obeying or legitimizing certain decisions that are made. So in terms of acts of omission, meaning things that you excited that you don't do, that you're expected to do, or that you're being asked to do. First is, you know, rejecting loyalty oaths, you know, being called upon to swear a loyalty oath, you know, around a candidate and individual, particularly when the outcome of the election is still, in doubt, very important thing. And to foster frank internal debate and transparency with outside stakeholders whenever possible. Another act of omission is going slow or slow down. So, basically, people, bureaucrats, federal workers performing their duties, at a foot dragging pace, which is less likely to attract attention than an overt strike, and has been used in a number of different cases. And then, you know, another higher risk, effort would be a labor strike or a walkout, would likely be illegal, but it's kind of, a high risk, high impact, a nonviolent action that federal workers can take, if they deem it necessary.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

17. Acts of Commission - Tactics for Federal Workers -Ask Questions -Wearing Symbols -Create a paper trail -Leaking (high risk) -Create Parallel Structures/Self-Organizing Units

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

18. Feds For BLM (Wearing Symbols) "I'm wearing a shirt that I think is acceptable under the Hatch Act. Vote like Black Lives Matter. I would wear something like this and I think you'd be okay wearing that on the job." -Sarah Starrett https://t.co/hfbR5vtR7a

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

19. Leak Everything You Can "..everyone who works in the federal government, if you read the mainstream press, like who is covering your agency, who is working for @propublica , who is working for @politico . They all have signal accounts. Text them, leak everything you can." https://t.co/90yVbpWZnl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker advises federal government employees to leak information to journalists from mainstream press outlets like ProPublica and Politico. They suggest using Signal to communicate and recommend saving emails and recording meetings. The speaker also suggests writing poorly to make the administration look bad. Whistleblower protections are discussed, and the speaker acknowledges the risk involved in their actions. They mention the possibility of finding another job and suggest passing on information to a colleague with a higher risk threshold. The importance of finding ethical journalists who will protect sources is emphasized.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I Speaker 1: I just recommend everyone who works in the federal government, if you read the mainstream press, like, who is covering your agency? Who is working for ProPublica? Who is working for Politico? They all have signal accounts. Text them, leak everything you can, save your emails, record I record these meetings. I send it over. Like and I can't believe I'm showing my face here, but I've been doing this for months. And if you do have to write something, write something with really crappy, you know, just unintelligible, ungrammatical language to just make them look Terrible. And it will look like something that comes from this administration anyway. But Speaker 0: and to your first point, I know we talked a little bit about Whistleblower protections. Do you have any sense of, like, what is and isn't, covered when you're kind of, like, linking things to a place like ProPublica over Signal or anything like that? Speaker 1: I I mean, again and I sort of prefaced it. Was like, I don't anticipate keeping the job for too long. So, I'm I'm just taking a risk, and I just believe in it, and I don't really care about the job anymore, which is terrible because I don't know what I'm gonna do without it. But I just figure I'll get another job. Speaker 0: Yeah. And I think that's definitely an important thing to think about, like, your own risk level. And if you're in a place where you're like, So be it, and taking that level for us is Speaker 1: The other thing is not everyone's in that position like me where I feel confident about, like, going back on the hunt for your job. You may have a colleague though who has a higher risk threshold than you do. So there's a way that you can pass on that information and that they're willing to be the front for it. Again, The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Meaning to be the source of the leaks. So just get to find out who those and most most respectable journalists do that. They try and shield their sources because that's Their their bread and butter that they give them the stories, so they don't wanna throw you under the bus or screw you.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

20. Acts Of Omission - Tactics for Federal Workers -Go Slow -Strike or Walkout (Illegal)

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

21. A Combination of Tactics "I understand that it's important to refuse to " let the trains run on time", for those who aren't able to strike. What would that look like in practical terms?" https://t.co/6LkaGz3oj1

Video Transcript AI Summary
To slow down operations and prevent strikes, the Department of Labor conducts multiple rounds of cost-benefit analysis for new regulations. If cheating on the numbers is suspected, leaked drafts are sent to the Office of Inspector General for investigation. This coordinated effort effectively stops the process. Strikes are considered a last resort, and alternative tactics include go-slow methods and showing solidarity with federal workers. The fear of being fired, as seen during the Reagan administration, discourages federal employees from taking action. However, partnerships with powerful unions in the private sector can provide support and help resolve issues. During the recent government shutdown, the air traffic controllers' issues influenced the unions in the airline industry, contributing to reopening the government.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To refuse the, quote, let the trains run on time for those who aren't able to strike, what would that look like in practical terms? What does it look like in practical terms to put, you know, to slow the gears down in some ways or another? Speaker 1: At at the Department of Labor, it it takes the form of, Several rounds of the cost benefit analysis for a new regulation. And when, when the numbers were when people were cheating on the numbers, a copy of that draft got leaked, to the data labor report and it got published and it got sent to a congressperson And the office of inspector general opened an investigation on who was cheating on the numbers. So again, that's sort of a combination of tactics. It's it's It's making really the paper trail. It's making sure that that document got out to someone who could make use of it and then congress getting the office of inspector general involved. It's It was really a way to stop that thing just in its tracks, and it it worked really well. But it was a coordinated effort by a lot of people. Speaker 0: Yeah. Absolutely. And, Maria, do you want to add to this? Speaker 2: Yeah. No. And, you know, the thing about strikes, I I completely agree with where Sarah was coming from. That strike is, kind of the worst option. I laid it out as an option just because it's, you know, it's there. It's available. It's kind of your conscience is, you know, past The point of no return, if you will. But I you know, there are definitely a lot of different go slow tactics. And I think, you know, this is also an area They're, you know, folks on the outside, so private citizens, those, in groups on the outside being able to show, solidarity with federal workers and And, you know, civil servants is particularly important during this moment, just to tell them, like, you've got, We've got your back on the outside. Do the right thing. Be ethical. Serve well. And I think we don't often think about that in the protest category, but, like, Incentivizing, folks doing the right thing, and having that be loud and clear is, you know, just, another another option. Speaker 3: Yeah. I'll add on to that, some information that, frankly, I've learned from other people who are attending this call, that, You know, there's obviously a history of, air traffic controllers, striking in the past and getting fired for that Under the Reagan administration, and I think that has kind of held through as, not just an actual barrier to Striking, but also, do makes federal employees deeply fearful of, action they can take. But I also in the most recent government shutdown, I think there was a really strong relationship between the air traffic controllers, even though they did not Strike at any point, the issues that they pose to the unions in the airline industry that ended up playing a Usual in helping get the government back open. So I think having those partnerships with other, organizations, Powerful unions in the private sector that, can have our backs and vice versa will be really important. Speaker 0: Great. Thank you So much for everyone. For our 3 speakers and for folks asking, really wonderful, questions to extrapolate on. Right, in the note somebody said, fed flu struck many TSA and air controllers threatening to shut down airports. That is a particular, thing that we can all catch this winter?

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

22. Inside Outside Strategy "The importance of self organizing with colleagues from within the same bureau and across government agencies...connecting with civic groups and organizations on the outside" https://t.co/CkbWZy6AC7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Federal workers are encouraged to self-organize with colleagues within their bureau and across government agencies to build trust and navigate challenges together. They should also connect with civic groups and have open conversations with them. Legal support and advocacy from civil society organizations can be helpful if they need to take action. Contributing their knowledge and skills to civic groups can be beneficial. It is important to stay in communication with grassroots groups and be prepared in case of a stolen election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Being able to think about what you can do, as federal workers and seeing the relationship between those actions and what is happening outside the federal workplace. So really the importance of self organizing with colleagues from within the same bureau and across government agencies, which can help build trust and confidence as federal workers are having to navigate a really difficult terrain together, connecting with civic groups and organizations on the outside and having frank and honest conversations with them. And when you think about it, the legal support and advocacy work of civil society organizations could come in really in handy, you know, if and when you have to take certain actions on the inside. And then, you know, contributing as private citizens, knowledge, skills, expertise to civic groups, organizations that would benefit from them tremendously. And just remaining in communication with those groups that, you know, in a grassroots way or organizing preparing people, in the event that there is a stolen election. Learn what

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

23. Trump's Schedule F Executive Order The group of federal workers express their concerns over Schedule F possibly being enacted in Jan 2021. Schedule F would've required loyalty to the President. https://t.co/noS9LrjKCb

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

24. What If Trump Wins? "I'm putting my head in the sand on that one. I refuse to accept the possibility." -Sarah Starrett https://t.co/ngzMcuNuhd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the importance of creating spaces for people to connect and have conversations. They encourage individuals to reach out to colleagues for information and support. They also address a question about mentioning the possibility of a change in administration as part of one's job, stating that it is not illegal but should be framed as a policy question. They emphasize the need to consider all aspects of a problem to avoid arbitrary and capricious decision-making. The topic of preparing for a scenario where Trump refuses to accept defeat is brought up, with one panelist admitting fear of him outright winning but refusing to accept the possibility.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're not sure you have colleagues that you trust to talk to, that's one of the reasons of having this conversation. We wanna start having spaces for people to connect, and so maybe you'll meet somebody through this space that works at your agency that maybe has more information or talk to somebody at a different agency who maybe has awareness of what it's like where you are. So, we wanna help facilitate conversation even if you're not sure who to turn 2 at work. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's great. So I'm gonna go back to another, question I saw. I have a job that includes offering informed judgment on different matters And mentioning that there's a possible change of administration, and we need to consider that possibility would be considered a normal part of my job. I can see some political appointees reacting badly to that, but it's not against the rules if it's framed in that context. Does anybody wanna come there was also a comment about how, People might stay away from that, because political appointees would react badly, but, is there any is there anything illegal about it? Is there a problem with that? Any comments? Speaker 2: I don't think it's illegal. You're just you're just raising a policy question. I mean, one one of the things that we deal with all the time is if we do this, will we get sued? You know, who will sue us and what will be the arguments that they make? So we we have to try to make sure what we do is not arbitrary and capricious. And so if we fail to consider all the aspects of a problem, it's arbitrary and capricious. You know, so that's part of the job is just sort of calculate what's going on and react, you know, offer options anyway to react to it. Speaker 1: Great. Excellent. So there's a bigger question, and, maybe we wanna talk about that in the in relation to the topic of the night of wild federal workers about I understand the emphasis on preparing for a scenario where Trump refuses to accept the defeat, but I'm honestly more afraid of him just outright winning. How do we prepare for that? Anybody, any one of our, panelists? Maria, Maddie, Sarah, wanna take this? Speaker 2: I'm putting my head in the sand on that one. I refuse to accept the possibility.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

25. Calling It A Coup. While discussing scenarios, federal bureaucrats plan to name Trump contesting the election as a Coup. They plan to reject Trump's appointees and only assist Biden's Transition Team. https://t.co/cOE3mBHVxx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the importance of using the term "coup" to describe the current situation. They question whether they should listen to political appointees if they are not legitimate. They mention the need for a transition team if Biden wins, as they did during the previous transition. They express concerns about conflicting narratives regarding the transition and discuss the responsibilities of issuing visitor badges and granting IT access. They mention the challenges of starting work without physical access to the building. They also mention the possibility of choosing the leader based on their understanding of who won the election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think making sure that we're naming what is happening as a coup Mhmm. Language, and communications with coworkers will be really important. Speaker 1: Yeah. Totally agreed. In the at the NBC conversations that I've been having that's not on the federal We, also are often saying, like, call it a coup. It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not. Because the more you normalize that language, the more, it's like it becomes apparent. It's like most centrist folks in in the government might start actually accepting that. Speaker 0: Yeah. And I think, you know, I work on a project where I'm interacting on a daily basis with our politicals, and starting to call into question if we're in the midst of a coup, should we even be listening to our politicals because they are not here legitimately anymore. Speaker 2: That's a great question to be asking. Speaker 3: That said, I know that, you know, we if there's a Biden win next week, there's gonna be a transition team coming in, and, I think I'm gonna be spending a lot of Time working with them because I know, and I was around during the last transition. Like, we spent a lot of time preparing those briefing books, and we are not doing that this time. That is not A priority. And so a lot of that work is gonna have to be done sometime. I mean, the last time we spent about 6 months preparing a big fat briefing book. That's gonna all have to start all that work's gonna probably happen next week. Not that there was that much achieved policy wise these last 4 years. But I don't know if it's naive to say, but I'm gonna kind of, like, look like, I'm gonna have to shut out the current political appointees and go to the transition team and be like, this is you know, I'm looking ahead to the future. This is this is our work. So, you know, I hate to think that they are gonna be our saviors or something, but, Speaker 2: Can I Ask another nitty gritty question related to that? So say you have 2 narratives happening simultaneously. There's the existing Trump appointees saying there is no transition team because there's no transition. It's a continuation. Then you have Trump's side or Biden's side saying, I won, and my team is coming to the doors. Like, what are what are the responsibilities of the various people in your see to issue a visitor badge and physically let someone into the building and give them IT access and set up the meeting. Speaker 0: Yeah, I mean, I was gonna say, like, yes. They do need computers and stuff, but, like, right now, there are no doors. Like, how do you get done the Zoom logins, or how do you start Mhmm. You know We Speaker 3: can make those Terminations ourselves. We you know, they say you're gonna keep your account, and we're gonna start, and we're like I don't know. We're like the Lithuanian government in exile or something. We're gonna and then we're gonna start working with them. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I think it's almost, like, Definitely a risk factor, but if if there's a contested election and it's fairly clear to us who won, We we get to choose who the leader is, and I don't know what risk that puts on you, and and I'm not a fed again, so I don't wanna, like, In a weird situation, but, like, I think that is a point where you and your team and your supervisors and those, non appointee, like, I'm sorry. What's the the term? Career career staff can actually decide, like, well, according to our understanding, Biden won, and therefore, we are listening to his appointees and his transition team.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Break-Out Room Topics: 3 Scenarios "All scenarios assume in the week after the election either there is no clear winner or that Trump is denying that he lost." https://t.co/6agTnGTUaj

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Facilitators Guide For Federal Employee Activism Workshop This guide was distributed inside the groups "Movement Resources", an internal document hub. https://t.co/CPlJU4HxPJ

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

28. Affinity Groups - Role of Facilitators This internal document explains how affinity groups can operate together in clusters and the roles within. https://t.co/Gd4cRU2XXT

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

29. Activism Resources For Federal Workers Guide This internal document was distributed as the meeting ended. It's a tactical guide for federal workers on subverting the government from within. https://t.co/BdddtzJoZx

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

30. Subverting Trump From The Jump Doc. titled "Federal Service Articles" was linked inside the "Activism Resources for Federal Workers Guide". It evidences that this network, of subversive bureaucrats, was behind the leaks that plagued the Trump admin and were plotting subversion before Trump was even inaugurated. @propublica leaks.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

31. Stolen Election Action and Campaign A document titled "Grass Roots Emergency Election Protection Trifecta Action Guide" By Harvey Wasserman was inside their "Movement Resources" along with many other election related resources.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

32. Grass Roots Emergency Election Protection Trifecta Action Guide "The 2020 election is not likely to be cancelled or postponed. But it CAN be sabotaged or stolen. It will not be enough this year merely to register and vote. Nowhere near...join election boards, become poll workers and poll watchers, and more."

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

33. Pressure Points https://t.co/p19HRNqn83

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

34. Voter Registration "The first "leg" of the election trifecta is to register new voters, protect those now on the rolls, and restore those who've been purged." https://t.co/h9KuVI6gTs

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

35. Printing Ballots "Paper ballots must first be designed, printed, and published. Simple typos and deliberate manipulations can destroy elections." https://t.co/c5FYwpJVRO

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

36. Vote-By-Mail Mail-in ballots mass harvested and put in drop boxes. https://t.co/eIe3LGvNww

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

37. Chain of Custody "Tens of millions of paper VBM ballots will arrive at election boards" https://t.co/bn6Kfhz6tc

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

38. Election Protection At Voting Centers https://t.co/29LUSvTifT

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

39. The Ballot Acceptance Choke Point "In 2020, grassroots election protectionists must be embedded at the critical juncture of this decision-making process. In a massive VBM deployment, literally millions of ballots will arrive with small glitches, errors.." https://t.co/VOypcJpWQK

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

40. Counting & Recounting Ballots "In Ohio 2004, a federally mandated recount failed when official records from 56 of Ohios 88 counties "disappeared". https://t.co/LzlBk53Gjp

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

41. How to become an Election Protectionist https://t.co/tarbaap7Rk

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

42. Elections Admin State Of Play (8.18.20) Doc. shared in the groups "Movement Resources" outlining mail-in ballot margins in swing states, status on ballot drop boxes, mobile voting, vote-by-mail rejection rates, projected provisionals and election laws/litigation status. https://t.co/IQYETRvNzR

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

44. Interactive Map of Swing States Doc found inside "Movement Resources" and credited to Patrick Young, Shut Down DC leader. https://t.co/wywIAifiy7

DecentBackup
Posted - September 6, 2024 at 3:08 PM
Saved - September 6, 2024 at 9:54 PM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Be a shame if peeps inside were feeding us intel on the FBI/CIA/Mossad operatives planning to infiltrate Constitutionally-protected uprisings in the wake of a stolen 2024 election on behalf of foreign nations. A real shame indeed. Imagine if we SHARED it w/local law enforcement.

Timcast
Posted - November 15, 2024 at 2:34 PM
Saved - November 15, 2024 at 6:41 PM

@Timcast - Tim Pool

Oh what's that? Democrats are discussing forming a parallel governmental structure? I wonder what this will lead to

@amuse - @amuse

Democrats are openly rejecting the democratic results of the election and are forming a shadow government to work against the will of the American voters. Worse than denial this is treason. https://t.co/wbrEKi4PIS

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Trump tries to manipulate the justice system, Adam Schiff could serve as a shadow attorney general, opposing the appointment of loyalists. Should Trump aim to dismantle the Department of Education, Johanna Hayes might step in as shadow education secretary to advocate for public education. If Trump compromises Ukraine's security, Greg Meeks could act as shadow secretary of state, supporting international relations. Michael Bennet and Susan Del Bene could represent middle-class interests as shadow treasury and commerce secretaries, respectively. Adam Smith might counter Trump's military threats as shadow defense secretary, while Tammy Duckworth could defend veterans' benefits. Cathy Castor could advocate for environmental protections against Trump's EPA appointments, and Rosa DeLauro might defend women's rights and Medicare as shadow secretary of health and human services. This shadow cabinet aims to oppose extreme actions and clarify our values.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Trump attempts to weaponize the justice system against his political opponents with Matt Gaetz at the helm, we could see incoming senator Adam Schiff as our shadow attorney general, arguing against replacing our independent prosecutors with Trump loyalists. If Trump seeks to eliminate the Department of Education, congresswoman Johanna Hayes, a former teacher of the year, could step up as shadow education secretary to loudly defend public education in the United States. If Trump orders Marco Rubio to hand Ukraine and much of Eastern Europe to Russian president Vladimir Putin, congressman Greg Meeks as shadow secretary of state could be a strong voice in support of maintaining international relationships and protecting democracy at home and abroad. Senator Michael Bennet as shadow treasury secretary and congresswoman Susan Del Bene as shadow commerce secretary could help ensure the middle class and small businesses have a voice in government and call out Trump's proposed tax cuts for billionaires and corporations. A shadow defense secretary, congressman Adam Smith, a great representative for the people of Washington and not a Fox News host, could counter Trump's threat to use military force against his political opponents and work to ensure that the Department of Defense stays loyal to the Constitution and not some wannabe dictator. And senator Tammy Duckworth could argue against cuts to the Department of Veterans Affairs that would delay the benefits and care our service members have so rightly earned. If Trump hands over the EPA to big oil ally Lee Zeldin, we could see congresswoman Cathy Castor pushing back for environmental protection and conservation to protect the air we breathe and the water we drink. And if Trump pushes to ban abortion nationwide, congresswoman Rosa DeLauro could step in as shadow secretary of health and human services to defend women's right to choose and argue against the gutting of Medicare by Trump and his cronies. Mister Speaker, new times require new solutions. The shadow cabinet isn't just about opposing extreme MAGA attacks on our government. It's also about making clear what we stand for, not just what we're against.
JackPosobiec
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Saved - January 13, 2025 at 2:48 PM

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

BREAKING: Nearly Half of Federal Employees Plan to Resist Trump, Poll Finds https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/01/13/deep-state-gearing-nearly-half-federal-employees-swamp-plan-resist-trump-poll-finds/

DEEP STATE GEARING UP: Nearly Half of Federal Employees in the Swamp Plan to Resist Trump, Poll Finds A groundbreaking survey from RMG Research finds that bureaucrats in the federal government plan to act like a deep state opposing Trump. dailysignal.com
amuse
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Saved - January 13, 2025 at 9:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During Trump's first term, federal employees opposed to his policies organized resistance, sharing strategies weekly. Recent polling indicates that half of current federal employees plan to sabotage his second term, highlighting the urgency for @VivekGRamaswamy to take action immediately. Additionally, Democrats have been placing loyalists within the federal government to obstruct Trump's agenda. It's crucial for @VivekGRamaswamy's @DOGE to begin addressing this issue from day one.

@amuse - @amuse

DOGE: When Trump's first term began federal employees opposed to the new president and his policies began organized resistance - holding weekly calls to share ideas and strategies. I knew at least one of these federal employees doing this at DHS. New polling shows that half of the current federal employees openly admit they are going to sabotage President Trump's second term - that's why it is vital that @VivekGRamaswamy gets in there and starts cutting ASAP.

@amuse - @amuse

DOGE: Don't forget that Democrats have been actively 'burrowing' thousands of loyalists inside of the federal government who are there to stop Trump's agenda at all costs. We need @VivekGRamaswamy's @DOGE to start removing the rot on day one. https://t.co/n28BOGz7BT

@amuse - @amuse

x.com/i/article/1867…

laralogan
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 1:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that those who resist the President's agenda are acting as traitors and should be dismissed. They were not elected and their actions amount to subversion, which is legally punishable. The lack of accountability for past behaviors has allowed this to continue. For Trump to fulfill his promises and protect himself and his family, he must ignore these infiltrators and focus on what the majority of the country elected him to do.

@laralogan - Lara Logan

They are traitors - and every single one of them should be fired. Their job requires them to implement the President’s agenda - they were not elected by anyone. He was. And “resistance” is subversion. It is punishable by law, under 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115, TREASON, SEDITION AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES. This subversive behavior is continuing because no one was held accountable for last time. So if Trump wants to do what he promised & if he doesn’t want them maliciously targeting him & his entire family again, he will not listen to the infiltrators already surrounding him & do what he was elected to do by the majority of this country.

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

BREAKING: Nearly Half of Federal Employees Plan to Resist Trump, Poll Finds https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/01/13/deep-state-gearing-nearly-half-federal-employees-swamp-plan-resist-trump-poll-finds/

DEEP STATE GEARING UP: Nearly Half of Federal Employees in the Swamp Plan to Resist Trump, Poll Finds A groundbreaking survey from RMG Research finds that bureaucrats in the federal government plan to act like a deep state opposing Trump. dailysignal.com
elonmusk
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 9:02 PM
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 5:03 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Wow

@amuse - @amuse

@LeadingReport This is an absolute fact. During Trump's first term I was fairly good friends with someone at the DHS who was a HUGE Hillary supporter. When Trump won she lost her mind. She told me about weekly meetings at DHS where employees discussed ways to stop Trump's various efforts.

JackPosobiec
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 1:47 PM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 5:56 PM

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

Federal workers actively stating they are declaring ‘war’ on the Trump Admin from within the govt https://t.co/DO6kWGhrQK

JimmyFalk_55
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 6:19 PM

@JimmyFalk_55 - Jimmy Falk5

@JackPosobiec [2017] Washington based Staff members (SES etc) all should be fired...And be investigated for #Treason and #Sedition. In 2017 these staffers planned a quiet coup vs the incoming President Trump. https://t.co/cOSP3sywp1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Exclusive footage reveals coordination among leftist groups, including Shutdown DC and BLM, planning a coup action with assistance from Democrats and federal employees. They aim to disrupt Washington, DC, and other major cities starting November 4th until inauguration day. Discussions include strategies for blockading the White House and shutting down larger areas of the city. Participants are encouraged to gather at BLM Plaza on election night and target key government buildings and police stations. The plan emphasizes creating a crisis to assert control, with a focus on supporting those willing to take decisive action. The left is determined to seize power, regardless of the election outcome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our undercover inside the Sunrise Movement was able to obtain exclusive video footage inside Zoom chats where shutdown DC, BLM, and other leftist organizations are coordinating a multilevel coup action exercise utilizing insider help from Democrat party members as well as federal employees and intelligence contractors. I'm a management and programs analyst. I work in the national security community. I spent three and a half years, as a contractor at DHS HQ. Speaker 1: If you read the mainstream press, like, they all have signal accounts, text them, leak everything you can. The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me to be the source of the leaks. Speaker 2: Groups on the outside being able to show, solidarity with federal workers. Speaker 0: Making sure that we're naming what is happening as a coup. Totally agreed. In the shutdown, DC conversations that I've been having and that's not on the federal side, we, also are often saying, like, call it Speaker 1: a coup. Speaker 0: They plan to shut down Washington, DC and other major US cities starting November 4th until inauguration day. Speaker 3: Do we have any plans for how to respond if there's a coup? Speaker 2: Come to BLM Plaza, anytime after 4 PM on election night. On 5th, we're gonna, shut down the White House. Map the White House and know every access point, so we knew we're gonna blockade it. On 6th, we're gonna shut down, larger parts of Washington DC. We've been working on a target map and a framework for scenario. Speaker 4: So where are all the police stations? Where are all the key government buildings? Who are the Trump boosters? Speaker 3: Members of congress that are coming in, we're gonna meet up Speaker 1: at the airports or at Union Station, and send them back to where Speaker 2: they came from until we deal with the the situation that we're in. We are going to be in a crisis, but we want it to be one that we are creating. Whoever's got the guns can win. Let's take over the buildings. If there are people that are willing to do that, we should support them. Get ready to shut your city down on the 4th or 5th. Speaker 0: Regardless of who wins, the left plans to take over.
amuse
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 7:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
An undercover video from James O'Keefe reveals that some members of the unelected bureaucracy believe they control the government, rather than the president and his appointees. A DHS employee discusses efforts to undermine President Trump and Secretary Kristi Noem. I recall knowing someone in a similar position at DHS during Trump's first term who was open about trying to obstruct the president's agenda. Notably, the DHS employee featured in the video is no longer with the agency.

@amuse - @amuse

DOGE: Undercover video from @JamesOKeefeIII reveals an open secret among members of the unelected bureaucracy that they, not the president and his appointees run the government. This DHS civil 'servant' explains how he and his colleagues will work to stop President Trump and Secretary @KristiNoem. I personally knew someone that worked in a similar job at DHS during Trump's first term and they did not hide their efforts to derail the president's agenda. The DHS employee in this undercover video is no longer in his role at the agency.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intention to defy Secretary Kristi Noem's orders, stating that while secretaries can set priorities, they cannot dictate actions. He emphasizes that there is significant room for interpretation of those priorities within the department. Wright describes the bureaucratic layers that filter directives, allowing him to navigate around Noem's agenda. He also shares concerns about the impact of Noem's conservative stance on his transgender colleagues, who are anxious about potential discrimination. Overall, Wright conveys a sense of disillusionment with the current leadership and the challenges faced by employees under Noem's administration.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christine, now I'm Yeah. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. So the secretaries can set the priorities for the department. They can't actually tell us what to do. We don't agree with those priorities. There's a lot of room for interpretation Mhmm. In terms of how we interpret what those priorities are. Speaker 1: Meet Brandon Wright, a platform services manager for the Department of Homeland Security. Brandon Wright states to our undercover journalist how he will defy Kristi Noem's orders. Wright also said he won't let Kristi Noem get in his way. Speaker 0: So you're talking about okay. We don't let them get in the way. Okay. Good. You're hearing, like, the real and stuff like that. From, like, we don't let them get in the way. Yeah. And and frankly, that's actually I would argue I'm not even being an asshole. I would argue. That's my job. You know how a sentence it works? Because Russell, like, catches all that shit and, like, filters and drops and then sand and everything. There's a lot of layers like that in government. And by the time actual marching orders get to, like, me and below, who can filter me in a way that I like it. That ease the ship. Speaker 1: The official at DHS discloses how GS fourteens and GS fifteens at the DHS will defy Noam's orders and how they will disregard her agenda. Speaker 0: I feel really, really bad on the other fifteens because they have to deal with the crazy shit. Shit. And it's Speaker 2: not it's not easy. Speaker 0: Because like I said, when it's like, the crazy person of the dresser, they have to, like, work really hard. Yeah. To, like, steal people. Yeah. A lot of ass kissing. Maybe like, oh, what a great idea, secretary Noam. Well, but Speaker 3: what if we did this? Speaker 0: I think your idea would be even better if we did it like this. Speaker 1: The DHS official tells our OMG undercover journalist that DHS could fall on Kristi Noem's head, and she wouldn't recognize what it is. Speaker 4: She has no her asthma. Speaker 0: The Department of Homeland Security could fall on her fucking head, and she wouldn't recognize what it is. Okay. Speaker 5: Christina Ome doesn't know shit. Speaker 1: Meet Brandon Wright, a platform services manager for the Department of Homeland Security. Brandon is a civil servant and a GS 14 employee. Brandon has been employed at DHS for the 1st Trump term, the Biden administration, and now the 2nd Trump administration. GS means general schedule and is a federal pay scale that has 15 grades. GS 13 to GS 15 are mainly top level technical and supervisory positions. Speaker 0: So my job is my title is I'm the platform it's not James Bond. But it's platform services manager, which is way less sexy. I'm a full time civil servant, but I don't work for the state department. I work for Homeland Security. I was here during Trump's first 4 years. I work for what's called HSSIN, h h s I n, the Homeland Security Information Network. Okay. We're like Google tools for Homeland Security Alliance. My role is I don't know what you know about IT, but I'm in product management. Most days, my job feels really fucking boring. I can just sit on some meetings and, like, look at spreadsheets and PowerPoint decks and talk in meetings. Unfortunately, my bubble is far enough away that I don't get thrown into that too much. If you go because I I don't know. There's 15 levels in government with service. So, like, the 15 is the highest. It's called GS. You'll hear people in DC. You'll hear people talk about it all the time. GS stands for general schedule. But that's, like, the level you are in government. So I'm 14. Oh, wow. The 15s are the people that, like, are at the White House doing stuff like so, like, I report to those people. Like, I only rarely will I, like, go to the ranks or something. Or sometimes they're, like, rare because they're the 15s are the highest level. They're the ones who interact with all the appointees. Yeah. I'm the one who makes all the reports and does all the work for the 15s Okay. And then, like, keeps them and so, like and, I mean, sometimes I do meet with the White House administration people too. And so at some point, I would like to that that would be a promotion. I would like to get promoted at some point, which would be great. But, like, for now, if Harrison won, I would have been, like, stepping on the gas to get promoted. Speaker 1: Brandon Wright met with our OMG undercover journalist last week to vent his hatred about Trump appointed DHS secretary, Kristi Noem. Speaker 6: So I was looking up because I remember that you worked at DHS. I was I was trying to do homework. Speaker 0: Yep. Speaker 6: And I looked up who was coming in, like Got it. Chuck is putting in charge. Speaker 0: Mhmm. She's nuts. Christy Noll. You wanna know what my favorite thing about the secretary of my work is? The last one was. He gave us a ton of bonus vacation. No way. Personally, no. I'm gonna be back to work. No way. Speaker 6: You don't think so? Speaker 0: No. No. She's gonna be like, fuck you. Because that's the thing. No. She's gonna be like, fuck you. You're laughing. Because that's the thing. Trump is picking people that hate us. That's what that's what he wants. He wants people who wants he wants cosmic. Speaker 1: After experiencing 4 years of a volatile economy, America is facing record inflation and a massive threat to the US dollar. Experts are warning the stock market could crash, and we could be facing a recession. In these uncertain times, I recommend gold to my audience, and I trust Fisher Capital as my official gold partner. Not only have my friends at Fisher delivered 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars in gold to their clients, they have also proven to be vigilant and right on the front line, supporting causes that make our country stronger and better. Fisher Capital is the largest corporate partner for Turning Point USA, close friends of OMG. We appear at their events every December and continues to make sure the new administration is successful. Based on my experience and client testimonials, the team at Fisher Capital consists of some of the most caring and compassionate individuals in finance today. And when you click the link, you will qualify for an exclusive offer only available to my listeners where you can get up to $20,000 of free silver with your qualifying purchase. When you speak with Fisher, make sure to mention that James O'Keefe sent you. Our portfolios are too important to trust to stocks and bonds alone. Protect yourself with gold today and get it from Fisher Capital. Go to fisheromg.com. That's fisheromg.com. Fisheromg.com. The DHS official tells our OMG undercover journalist that DHS could fall on Kristi Noem's head and she wouldn't recognize what it is. He also stated that Kristi Noem, quote, doesn't know her and Kristi Noem doesn't know Speaker 6: shit. Tell me what you hate about it. Speaker 4: She doesn't know her the Department Speaker 0: of Homeland Security could fall on her head and she wouldn't recognize what it is. Speaker 5: Kristi Noem doesn't know shit. Speaker 0: Yeah. So to say that, like, I am not excited about this is would be the most epic on her speech. Speaker 6: Okay. But when you have somebody that looks crazy, like, the job that Speaker 0: you have recognize that about her by researching her. I You get That's a that's a great that's a great that's a great that's a great that's a great leg from that. We're on the same page. Speaker 1: We asked Brandon Wright on the undercover meeting what he is going to do when Kristi Noem is the boss. Wright told us that, quote, the secretaries can set the priorities for the department, but they can't actually tell us what to do. Wright also said he won't let Kristi Noem get in his way. Speaker 0: So the secretaries can set the priorities for the department. Speaker 6: And she's the secretary. Speaker 0: Okay. But they can't They couldn't actually tell us what to do. So do you wanna have the truth? Remember when I told you, like, on the call, I was like, the people who are truly in charge are the permanent selves. Right? Straight. The truth is, we don't let them get on the way. Speaker 6: Okay. Good. Speaker 0: You're hearing, like, the real talk. From, like, we don't let them get on the phone. Speaker 1: Brandon Wright, the official at DHS, discloses how GS fourteens and GS fifteens at the DHS will define Noam's orders and how they will disregard her agenda, saying there's a lot of room for interpretation. Speaker 0: I feel really, really bad on the fifteens because they have to deal with the crazy Speaker 2: and it's not it's not easy. Speaker 0: Because like I said, when it's, like, the crazy person of the dresser, they have to, like, work really hard Yeah. To, like, scare you. Yeah. A lot of, like, a lot of isn't it? They'd be like, oh, what a great idea, secretary Noam. Speaker 3: Well, but what if we did this? Speaker 0: I think your idea would be even better if we did it like this. And, like, what they're proposing is the, you know The Speaker 6: better idea. Yeah. Well, let's say she doesn't take their idea, and she's like, no. I wanna be crazy. Is there, like, something you can do about that? Speaker 0: Or It's very complex. And in some ways, it's very stupid. So Okay. But they can set the priorities. I would put it to you like this. If we especially the 15 leaders Speaker 6: that math. Speaker 0: But even going down 14 and everything below. We don't agree with those priorities. There's a lot of room for interpretation Yeah. In terms of how we interpret what they said. Speaker 1: Brandon Wright states to our undercover journalist how he will defy Kristi Noem's orders, stating that when marching orders from Noem reach him, he can filter them, drawing an analogy to that of a septic tank. And as it goes through the layers of government, he will defy those orders. Speaker 0: You know what I'm saying? Speaker 6: It all is, like, storage. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. But it's, like, in a private lot, and it starts off with, like, a bunch of layers of, like, rocks. And there's, like, living layers of rocks. So it, like, catches all the and, like, filters the rocks and then sand and everything. There's a lot of layers like that. You got me. And by the time actual marching orders get to, like, me and below, who can filter it in a way that like it. Steadies the shit? Speaker 6: So you can, like, interpret it in a way that makes more sense. Speaker 0: Lawyer. Now you're thinking of it. The mortgage. Okay. As long as they don't cut our budget again, that's the number one thing they can affect is our budget. Yeah. As If they cut our budget, that's that. Alright. We can be screwed. If our budget goes away, we're Speaker 1: In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at the wellness company, the ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations where you're exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites. And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at the wellness company by going to twc.health/omg.twc.health /omg. That's t w c dot help slash omg. And now you can save 50% just by using code o m g at checkout. Wright also describes how his transgender colleagues are freaking out because Kristi Noem has been appointed to DHS. Speaker 6: With her being as conservative as she is, I'm like, okay. What if there's people that work, like, in your team or maybe there's, like, a 15 or something? What if they're neurodiverse or LGBTQ? Yeah. Like, do you think she's gonna target them or, like, try to make their lives worse? Speaker 0: That's actually a really good question. The biggest thing is the the, this administration is super anti trans. And so, like, yeah, having a you know, we we've got a lot of trans people. They're freaking out. My trans colleagues are freaking. Speaker 1: If you're on the inside of any government institution and notice corruption, lies, deception, fraud, or abuse, reach out to us on our OMG hotline at 914-491-9395. Call that number or shoot us a message on signal at that number or message us tips at o'keithmediagroup.com, and we'll get back to you. Thank you, and stay tuned.
bennyjohnson
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Saved - February 4, 2025 at 12:28 AM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨Julie Kelly URGES FBI agents to participate in the MASSIVE walkout: "Go ahead and do it. You need to exercise your rights to protect the deep state and protect your jobs. Walk out and let the American people see who you are... who destroyed the public's trust." https://t.co/IlPFZjE0ty

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are reports of FBI lawyers claiming that actions against certain employees could be unconstitutional. Norm Eisen and Mark Zaid have warned the DOJ about potential legal action if the Trump administration attempts to remove or reassign FBI or DOJ staff. This is ironic, given their past violations of due process rights for January 6 defendants. Meanwhile, rumors suggest an impending FBI walkout, with some agents urged to stand their ground. One New York FBI field office director emphasized entitlement to their jobs. A walkout could expose the agents’ sense of entitlement and accountability for eroding public trust in the DOJ and FBI.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I'm hearing these little rumblings, about FBI lawyers saying you can't do this. It's unconstitutional. I'm gonna say does that is that gonna hold any water? Speaker 1: Right. So Norm Eisen, our favorite, law fair architect, and Mark Zaid, who also has been involved in the law fair against the president and his supporters. They sent a letter to the DOJ, I believe it was yesterday warning, the DOJ. Now this is really rich, right? The same people who have denied and violated the due process rights of J6ers and president Trump by the way, led to targeted harassment of January 6 defendants and their family members violated their due process and their constitutional rights. Now Norm Eisen and Mark Zaid are claiming that any firing or reassignment or attempting to remove these FBI DOJ employees out of the department, that they are going to pursue legal action against the Trump administration for doing that. It's I posted the letter on my, ex account this morning if people wanna check it out. It's just too ironic to see Mark Zaid and Norm Eisen complain that the constitutional rights of these FBI and DOJ employees could be violated when that's exactly what they've done to, you know, 1600 plus Americans. Apparently, there were more investigations underway, Benny. They were saying there's reports that there were 2,400 total investigations into January 6th. So had president Trump not won, those prosecutions, those cases would have been pursued resulting in arrests and prosecutions of 100 of more k sixers. Speaker 0: Please tell me, Julie, that the FBI is not going to stage a walkout, against this. There's rumblings here that the FBI is gonna do a walkout. Now we remember what happened the last time that the lady Ghostbusters went out and and and kneeled to BLM. I think we should let's let's let's grab those images, please, boys. But apparently, there's rumors of an FBI walkout about to happen. What's your what's your message to those FBI Speaker 1: agents? I say go ahead and do it. You need to stand your ground. You need to exercise your rights to, to to protect the deep state and protect your jobs as one of the, New York, I believe it was the New York FBI field office director sent this, email over the weekend as well to his colleagues, urging them to stand their ground, that he was gonna dig in his heels. He was not going anywhere, that they're entitled to these jobs. So I think that they should walk out, Benny, and let the American people see who they are and their sense of entitlement and, their, their hopefully accountability that's coming for all of them. So let's pull them out of the shadows. Let's see who they are and explain themselves why they think that they're entitled to these federal jobs when they are responsible for destroying the public's trust in the DOJ and FBI. These are the people, yes, that had the 7th floor, the director, that deputy director, including the one, the Washington field office who was fired last week. But this is a rank and file problem issue. So, yes, I strongly encourage a walk out. Let let let's see them. Speaker 0: Please. More more more photos like this.
robbystarbuck
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 1:45 AM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 12:43 AM

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Trump team needs to go through this thread and fire every single one of these employees for conspiring to subvert the orders of the President. Then investigate and charge those who committed a crime. Drawing strong lines prevents this kind of behavior. It must be done. @DOGE

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Thread: 1. Far-Left US Government Employees Conspired To Subvert President Trump, Gum Up Bureaucratic Processes, Strike, and Leak To The Media A network of radical marxist bureaucrats conspired in secret meetings, plotting how to use their official positions inside the US Government to enact their political agenda.

nataliegwinters
Posted - February 24, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 3:08 PM

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

🚨 Unelected bureaucrats are setting up “encrypted Signal chats, Zoom calls and Instagram accounts to share information and plan future actions” on how to resist Trump. https://t.co/ZpqyXAIOct

DefiyantlyFree
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 10:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Indivisible is at the forefront of organizing protests against Tesla, hosting weekly calls to strategize. During a recent call, I noted their emphasis on nonviolence, likely due to legal pressures. A federal employee from the American Federation of Government Employees Union spoke about rallying nationwide protests, linking Indivisible to the Civil Service Strong coalition. Jasmine Crockett, a sitting Congress member, also participated, indicating political involvement in the movement. An independent journalist revealed the goal is to undermine Tesla's stock, raising legal concerns. Other organizations involved include Planet Over Profit and the Civil Liberties Defense Center.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

🧵🧵Indivisible is definitely the ring leader of the Tesla Takedown domestic terrorism movement. They are the main organizers, they host the weekly calls to lay out their plans. Today was one of them. The call was one hour and ten mins and had some very interesting moments. I see that today all over their messaging it says nonviolent because of the charges that were brought by Pam Bondi so they seem a little spooked. Anyway, I listened to their entire organizing call for the 500 protests they are trying to organize for 3/29. Truly dystopian stuff.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

1. One of the speakers is a federal employee who belongs to the American Federation of Government Employees Union. For that that don’t remember, they are one of the six groups that teamed up on December 19, 2024, to take down Trump. Marc Elias launched Civil Service Strong. The press release calls the firm a coalition of civil society institutions and organizations, including 2.2 million federal government civil servants. She spoke on the call to rally protesters all across the country to make their voices heard. So I just connected Indivisible with Civil Service Strong because it’s all tied together.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

One of the most interesting parts of this one hour call was that Jasmine Crockett came on to speak because clearly she is part of this entire takedown Elon Musk apparatus. A sitting member of Congress is working with Indivisible to take down an American car company and destroy its owner.

Video Transcript AI Summary
On March 29, the speaker wants Elon to be "taken down." As a member of the Doge Oversight Committee, the speaker believes money is the only language those in charge understand. The speaker says they are fighting for the country, democracy, and freedoms, but clarifies this is figurative and non-violent. The speaker urges people to use their constitutional rights to protest elected officials who ignore the people's voices. The speaker claims the board is telling Elon to step aside and Tesla is not welcomed in Canada due to fears. The speaker thanks people for driving the movement and says the real power lies with the people. The speaker claims Elon has lied and kept information from the public, gained information from the treasury department and social security, and called social security a Ponzi scheme. The speaker accuses Elon of trying to line his pockets with money that should be going to those that need it most. The speaker urges people to "scream in the streets" and consult with attorneys, especially when protesting worldwide.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On March 29, it's my birthday. And all I want to see happen on my birthday is for Eli to be taken down. Yes. Listen, I have learned as I serve on the Doge Oversight Committee that there is only one language that the people that are in charge understand right now. And that language is money. And so I've been so proud to see us organized behind the cause because here's the deal. The things that we're fighting for, we are fighting for our country. We're fighting for democracy. We're fighting for our freedoms. And when I say fighting, I'm saying that figuratively. Obviously, everything that I am promoting is non violent. And so definitely don't want anyone to take that word literal in any way. But I think that it is important that we say that we stand for freedom in this country. We stand for our constitution in this country. And the best way to show that we are American is by using our constitutional rights and deciding that we are going to engage in protests, especially when we have elected officials and then unelected people like him. We have elected officials that don't even want to listen to the people. This is a way to yell and scream at people that are trying to close their ears to everything that the people are crying out for. Because when we are looking at a democracy, especially a democratic Republic, as we reside in, then it is supposed to be the people's voices that are heard. But right now we've got people that are saying, you know what, forget what the people are saying, ignore them and take their livelihoods away from them. Take their ability at attaining the American dream away from them. And we'll just close our ears and pretend like they don't exist. Well, let me tell you on March 29, I want you to raise your voices all over the world. And I want you to be heard, heard in such a way that no matter how much they try to ignore you, they just can't. And what we are seeing is that because people are driving this movement, we've seen that now the board is saying, Hey, Elon, you need to step aside because you messing up everything. We saw here recently that Tesla is not being welcomed in Canada and Vancouver because they are afraid of what may come along with that. And so listen, if our government refuses to listen, there's another way to really make them think hard about listening to you. And it comes in the form of your protest. So I just want to say thank you because I think far too often people forget that the real power lies literally with the people. And so to see how many people are out here and they're passionate and they are concerned about whether it's their personal identifying information that has been turned over or maybe not, or who knows, because they've lied and they've kept everything from us. Whether it's that information that they gained from the treasury department, whether it's information they gained from social security, whether it's the fact that we are fighting or we're trying to preserve the social security for our mothers and our grandmothers and ourselves as literally Elon has sat around and said things such as it's a Ponzi scheme. And the only Ponzi that I see that is scheming is him. He right now is trying to line his pockets with money that should be going to those that need it most. Whether it's in the form of healthcare, whether it's in the form of food, whether it's in the form of foreign aid, the things that he is doing, are harming our country. And there is no reason that we should be looking out and trying to say, well, this guy is the richest man and we just need to make him richer. You are sending a message and I am so thankful. I'm going to keep screaming in the halls of Congress. I just need y'all to make sure that y'all keep screaming in the streets. So I appreciate you. Thank you so much for allowing me to speak. Please go out there, be safe, make sure that you understand what the rules are, where you live. Make sure that if you have the ability, if there's any legal counsel, especially when we're talking about doing this all over the world, we want to make sure that we consult with attorneys. That is one of the things that I miss the most is I used to always assist whenever there were protests so that people would understand the law exactly where they were. So make sure if you've got an opportunity, pull

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

This was my favorite speaker, the independent journalist and hacker who tells us the entire point of these organized protests are to tank Tesla stock. Not a lawyer but this seems illegal to me. https://t.co/9V2aNrdDR2

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2022, as Director of Information Security at The Intercept, the speaker wrote articles critical of Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter, including his purging of leftist accounts and reinstatement of neo-Nazis and anti-vaxxers. Subsequently, Musk permanently suspended the speaker's account, then reinstated it after a poll, but demanded deletion of a tweet. Instead, the speaker quit Twitter for a year. The speaker now works with a collective that makes open-source security and privacy software, including Syd.social, an app to delete data from X and migrate tweets to Blue Sky. The speaker is also involved in Tesla Takedown, a nonviolent movement aiming to devalue Tesla stock and force Musk to sell shares to cover his Twitter debt. The goal is to trigger a Tesla stock "death spiral."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Calling in from Northern California. I'm excited to be here. I'm an investigative journalist and a hacker. So, yeah, back in 2022, when I was the director of information security at The Intercept, I wrote a lot of articles about Elon Musk taking over Twitter. I wrote about how he immediately started purging prominent leftist accounts, how he brought back previously banned neo Nazis and anti vaxxers. Oh, sorry. This is my my cat Malcolm. And I also wrote about how basically Twitter users were now subject to Elon Musk's arbitrary whims. So, naturally, I was one of the eight journalists that he decided to permanently suspend from Twitter because he didn't like my speech. But then a few days later, after posting a Twitter poll, he changed his mind and unbanned me, but I was still locked out of my account until I deleted the tweet that the billionaire didn't like. So instead of deleting it, I just didn't use Twitter for about a year and, oh my god, it was so much nicer. So if you are still using x, I highly recommend that you quit. Even if you have a lot of followers, it's not worth it. So now I'm part of a workaround collective that makes open source security and privacy software. We make an app called Syd. You can find it at syd.social. It's c y d for clawback your data. That helps you delete all of your data from x, including deleting all of your tweets for free. If you want to, SID could also help you migrate your old tweets into Blue Sky, and we're adding support for Facebook and Instagram too because we need to defeat all of the oligarchs, not just Elon. Freeing yourself from fascist social media is really good for your mental health, but I'm really excited about Tesla takedown. We're a nonviolent grassroots protest movement that's focused on an actual winnable strategy to bring down Elon Musk. If we kill the Tesla brand, if we drive down the stock price low enough, we can force him to sell his stock to pay back the billions of dollars of debt that he took on to buy Twitter. This will drive Tesla stock into a death spiral. The fascists are purging the government of their debts. They're sending innocent people to Guantanamo Bay.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

Other prominent organizations involved and mentioned in the call: Planet Over Profit New Republic 50501 John Cusak Civil Liberties Defense Center Association of Flight Attendants Troublemakers Joan Donovan - original organizer of this entire project

ImMeme0
Posted - April 1, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Saved - April 1, 2025 at 8:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come across a Project Veritas video revealing a hidden resistance at NASA and the State Department. Employees are reportedly circumventing President Trump’s orders to eliminate DEI initiatives by simply renaming them and continuing the work.

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING: Project Veritas’ undercover video exposes a covert rebellion within NASA and the State Department, where employees are defying President Trump’s executive orders to dismantle DEI initiatives by rebranding them under new names. “They cancelled DEI stuff, but people just did it and called it something else. Work around the rules.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Federal offices are ending DEI programs due to President Trump's executive orders. State departments have already canceled DEI initiatives, but some suggest renaming DEI programs to circumvent the rules, such as using "multicultural activities" or "team building." Concerns arise about writing proposals using terms like "climate change" under the new administration. Some suggest replacing "climate change" with "natural hazards" to secure funding, as funding for Earth science may be affected. While NASA's overall funding may not be cut due to Trump's interest in space, Earth science is expected to be impacted. There is a sense of depression and uncertainty, but some remain hopeful that changing the verbiage will help.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it has to go away from your now DEI stuff? Speaker 1: The same thing happened from last time because I was already working on the Trump post president last time. They, like, canceled DEI and stuff, but people just, like, did it and called it something else. Just work around the rules. Speaker 2: Now we have to be careful with, like, writing proposals with terms like climate change or whatever. Because people like that term, they don't need that. They're probably not not on any of that. Speaker 3: We can change the current Speaker 2: climate change by natural hazards or something like that. Yeah. Speaker 4: Is that what you had to do, like, your first time using my office? Speaker 2: Yeah. That's Speaker 5: pretty much what I did. Speaker 6: Still still able to get funding. Right? Speaker 4: Yeah. Was it DCI? How Speaker 5: well was it working? Wow. Speaker 2: Some people lose their jobs because some folks were hired exclusively to run the DI program. President Trump's deadline for federal offices to end their diversity, equity, and inclusion programs is fast approaching. Speaker 4: DEI is seemingly dead. Speaker 7: On Tuesday, president Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion or DEI government programs. Speaker 1: Already today, we got emails like, all DEA, DEI, stuff is canceled at the state departments. Speaker 5: So well, Speaker 1: I mean, it doesn't really affect my job, but it's true people who are working in those positions. I don't really know what they're gonna Speaker 0: So it has to go away from now, the EEI stuff? Speaker 1: Unclear. Like, I mean, the same thing happened the last time because I was already Trump was president last time in a different agency. Oh. And they like canceled the idea of stuff, but people just like did it and called it something else. Really? Yeah. So genius. I mean, yeah, just work around the So what did they do instead? So basically just like calling it like multicultural activities instead of like diversity and inclusion. Just just, like, change a word, but it means the Speaker 4: same thing. Speaker 0: It's genius. Yeah. So is that what they're Speaker 1: gonna do this time? Or, like, team building or something like that. Probably that's what they do. We'll see how strict they're gonna be about it. It's genius. People just end up Speaker 0: calling it something different, and it's just the same thing. Exactly. Speaker 2: It's been a little hard, but the new administration, they're like, you know, they're paying lots of new executive orders to, like, change rules and stuff. So, like, now we have to be careful with, like, writing proposals with terms, like, climate change or whatever. So why? Because they don't like that term. They don't believe in that. They're probably not not on any of that. Speaker 6: They're not gonna find any of this? Speaker 3: No. We can change the term Speaker 2: climate change by natural hazards or, you know, something like that. Speaker 4: Yeah. Is that what you had to do, like, your first time using that office? Speaker 2: Yeah. That's pretty much what Speaker 5: you do. Speaker 6: Still still able to get funding. Right? Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 2: Because natural hazard is always not. How can Speaker 6: they just take funding from climate change? That doesn't Speaker 0: it's not that's, like, one of the goals of NASA. Correct? Speaker 4: Yeah. That is really shocking Speaker 6: behavior that they they would revoke Monday. Speaker 2: Yeah. But if you can change Speaker 4: like you said, you change the terms. Speaker 2: Hopefully, like, let's hope for the bats. I don't know what's gonna happen, but it doesn't look good. Like, everyone is kind of depressed in a sense. Kind of like yeah. I'm not very hopeful for the next year guys. We'll see. Speaker 4: Are they losing funding as well the next or government funding anyway? I think Speaker 2: not as a whole because Trump is obsessed with the space and, like, you know, like, sending people to the government, like that. Definitely Earth science will behave. Speaker 4: It's so private that can change the the verbiage. Speaker 2: Yeah. We'll see. And, like, the the yeah. Speaker 4: What other words terms can you come up with? Speaker 0: Pickle word instead of time? Speaker 2: Yeah. Just like natural hazards, like, you know, like Speaker 1: yeah. It's environmental hazard.
America1stLegal
Posted - April 4, 2025 at 11:25 PM
Saved - April 6, 2025 at 1:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am urging Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to declassify the Biden Administration’s classified domestic surveillance and censorship strategy. My investigation revealed shocking details about how the administration has used "domestic terrorism" to justify censorship against political opponents. We've uncovered plans to monitor dissent, label pro-life mothers as radical suspects, and coordinate with tech companies to suppress free speech. I will continue to fight against the weaponization of intelligence services targeting conservatives and restore trust in our government.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨NEW: AFL is urging Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to declassify and release the Biden Admin’s classified domestic surveillance and censorship strategy. The Biden Admin’s weaponization of the intelligence apparatus against Americans must be fully exposed.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 In June 2021, the Biden Admin released an unprecedented 20-page “strategy” for a “whole-of-society approach” to “countering domestic terrorism.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 AFL launched an investigation into the Biden Admin’s censorship plan — and the revelations are shocking. AFL’s investigation exposed how “domestic terrorism” was used to justify the administration’s censorship agenda targeting its political and social opponents.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

America First Legal vows to shed light on this unholy marriage and fight for the privacy and the constitutional rights of all Americans. https://www.aflegal.org/news/afl-files-foia-demanding-answers-about-the-biden-administrations-domestic-surveillance-of-americans-and-collaboration-with-big-tech-companies

AFL Files FOIA Demanding Answers About the Biden Administration’s Domestic Surveillance of Americans and Collaboration with Big Tech Companies Washington, D.C. — Yesterday, America First Legal filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the […] aflegal.org

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 As part of the #DeepStateDiaries, AFL exposed how the Biden Admin had drafted a classified implementation plan — described by one official as “crisp and clear,” with “defined responsibilities” across the intelligence community.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨 We obtained new docs from the Brennan-Clapper DHS intel group revealing the Biden admin developed a classified plan to expand monitoring of political dissent. #DeepStateDiaries PART 5:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 This request is another step in AFL’s ongoing efforts to protect the American people from the Deep State and expose how the Biden Admin weaponized intelligence services and law enforcement against: ➡️ Conservatives ➡️ Military veterans  ➡️ People of faith ➡️ President Trump

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨#DeepStateDiaries RECAP🚨 Today, we are publicly releasing all of the documents from the Brennan-Clapper intel committee that we obtained in litigation. These docs further reveal the whole-of-government approach the Biden admin took to silence political dissent. 🧵RECAP:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 Here’s what AFL has already exposed…

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 The Biden Admin coordinated with tech companies to censor so-called “misinformation.” AFL’s findings were included in amended pleadings in Missouri v. Biden and served as the basis for significant factual discovery in the case and subsequent congressional investigations.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1 🚨💉THREAD: AFL lawsuit has revealed shocking documents from the CDC, revealing government collusion with Big Tech to censor free speech & promote Biden Admin propaganda. Twitter & CDC collusion⤵️: CDC sends Twitter officials a chart of tweets it deemed to be”misinformation”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/8 The Biden Admin labeled “pro-life mothers” as potential “radicalization suspects.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

We obtained stunning documents from the Office of Targeted Violence and Terrorism Prevention at DHS. They’re describing pro-life Americans as being “radicalization suspects.” You won’t want to miss these… 👀

@JustTheNews - Just the News

DHS 'bystander' training singles out pro-lifers, government critics as 'radicalization' suspects https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/dhs-bystander-training-singles-out-pro-lifers-government-critics?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social

DHS 'bystander' training singles out pro-lifers, government critics as 'radicalization' suspects Clergy, spouses, bartenders should keep tabs on "middle-aged" women who are "increasingly fervent" against abortion, white men who rant about government online and go to rallies, domestic terrorism materials say. justthenews.com

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/9 The Biden Admin blamed “Trump supporters” for “most of the domestic terrorism threat.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨 Internal docs from Biden’s DHS show their plans to target Trump supports as domestic extremists. The Brennan-Clapper intel group discussed how “most of the domestic terrorism threat now comes from supporters of the former president.” #DeepStateDiaries PART 2:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/10 ​​The Biden Admin ​​planned efforts to condition Americans to “get into local communities” in “non-threatening” ways and report their neighbors to the federal government.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨 New docs reveal DHS intel group proposed: ✔️Americans should report their neighbors to the feds ✔️Reclassifying political dissent under the guise of “public health” so that “mothers and teachers” feel comfortable coming forward #DeepStateDiaries PART 1:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/11 The Biden Admin coordinated the Mar-a-Lago raid — then told Americans it was simply “routine law enforcement” — and used people speaking out against the raid as a basis to justify spying on them.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨 Docs show Biden’s DHS intel group used Jan. 6 & the Mar-a-Lago raid to justify expanding surveillance of political dissent. The group advocated for “collection based on speech” — as in spying on Americans for criticizing their gov’t. #DeepStateDiaries PART 3:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/12 The Biden Admin ran classified censorship strategy calls out of the White House Situation Room.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

5/ The CDC used the White House Situation Room and the National Security Council’s classified systems to coordinate the censorship of online discussions relating to COVID-19.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/14 Second, AFL’s lawsuit against the CDC revealed extensive White House involvement in censorship efforts, including the use of the National Security Council’s classified systems and the White House Situation Room, to coordinate censorship of online discussions relating to

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/13 The Biden Admin coordinated with the UK government to censor Americans.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨🗣️EXCLUSIVE — FOREIGN COLLUSION TO CENSOR AMERICAN SPEECH: New docs from litigation against the CDC reveal the Biden-Harris White House hosted the “Counter Disinformation Unit” from the U.K. gov’t in 2021 to learn about their recommendations to censor speech. 🧵THREAD:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/14 AFL urges DNI Gabbard to declassify and release the Biden Admin’s classified surveillance and censorship strategy plan in order to restore trust and confidence in the federal government.  The Biden Admin’s weaponization of national security authorities must be fully exposed.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/15 AFL will keep fighting to protect Americans from the Deep State and combat the left’s weaponization of our intelligence services and law enforcement against political and social conservatives, military veterans, people of faith, and President Trump.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/16 Read more here: https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-asks-trump-administration-to-declassify-and-release-the-biden-administrations-classified-domestic-surveillance-strategy-detailing-plans-to-spy-on-and-censor-americans/

America First Legal Urges the Trump Administration to Declassify and Release the Biden Administration’s Classified Domestic Surveillance and Censorship Strategy WASHINGTON, D.C. – This week, America First Legal (AFL) sent a letter to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard requesting that she initiate a declassification […] aflegal.org
America1stLegal
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 3:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have declassified the Biden Administration’s surveillance and censorship strategy, revealing a plan to weaponize intelligence against Americans. This initiative, prompted by AFL's request, outlines how various agencies, including the FBI and CIA, aimed to surveil and censor citizens, particularly targeting those labeled as right-wing extremists. The strategy also involved sharing information with foreign governments and promoting digital literacy to combat misinformation. AFL will continue to expose these actions and their implications for free speech and civil liberties.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has declassified the Biden Administration’s top-secret surveillance and censorship strategy — exposing a chilling plan to weaponize the intelligence apparatus against the American people. 🧵👇 https://t.co/su5GUkL3Ym

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 On April 2, AFL formally urged @DNIGabbard to declassify the Biden Administration’s classified domestic surveillance and censorship strategy — a top-secret plan AFL uncovered through litigation against the Department of Homeland Security.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨NEW: AFL is urging Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to declassify and release the Biden Admin’s classified domestic surveillance and censorship strategy. The Biden Admin’s weaponization of the intelligence apparatus against Americans must be fully exposed. https://t.co/GLV9ylnwS6

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard /3 This week, in direct response to AFL’s request, DNI Gabbard declassified and released the Biden Administration’s top-secret surveillance and censorship strategy.

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

As promised, I have declassified the Biden Administration’s Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism.   Read it here: https://www.odni.gov/index.php/newsroom/dig/4064-dig-strat-impl-plan-ct-biden https://t.co/p9co00Scge

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

Thank you for your work. We are already on this, and look forward to declassifying this and other instances of the government being weaponized against Americans. Under President Trump’s leadership, @ODNIgov will bring transparency and accountability to end the weaponization of https://t.co/CPpUlA2eXy

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard /4 This thread breaks down the Biden Administration’s once-classified plan to surveil Americans and censor free speech in the United States.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard /5 In 2021, without any evidence, the Biden Administration declared that the greatest threat to Americans was “right-wing domestic terrorism” from supporters of President Trump.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨 Internal docs from Biden’s DHS show their plans to target Trump supports as domestic extremists. The Brennan-Clapper intel group discussed how “most of the domestic terrorism threat now comes from supporters of the former president.” #DeepStateDiaries PART 2: https://t.co/q2HcoAe2Kd

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 The Biden Administration’s classified surveillance strategy directed the State Department, FBI, DOJ, and CIA to “obtain from foreign partners foreign intelligence and information related to U.S.-based violent extremism.” In other words, the Biden Administration planned to outsource surveillance of Americans to foreign governments.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 As a subset of that strategic goal, the Biden Administration asked the FBI, CIA, DHS, and the State Department to study how disinformation relates to the “domestic terrorism threat” — connecting the whole-of-society censorship program to the national security and intelligence apparatus.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard /8 The Biden Administration’s classified censorship and surveillance strategy pushed for “information sharing across all levels,” including with “state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement partners.” https://t.co/Jo3EY7I3RG

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard /9 The left supports maximum information sharing with law enforcement to label conservatives as domestic terrorists… But if a local sheriff wants to work with ICE to turn over a murderous illegal alien, communication is prohibited because of “sanctuary” policies.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/10 The classified censorship and surveillance strategy also calls for funding for “digital literacy programming.” Despite the domestic scope of this plan, the Biden Administration tapped the State Department and USAID to produce “digital literacy programming” to “combat misinformation” online.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard /11 As @MikeBenzCyber has shown, “digital literacy” is when organizations — such as NewsGuard — approve certain publications as “trustworthy” and then suppress “non-trustworthy” sources as “misinformation.”

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

"Nudge Theory" is the bedrock of an unholy new field, born after the 2016 election, called "media literacy" (also called "digital literacy") "Media literacy" means if you don't read the right news sources (aka, mainstream slop), you are "media illiterate" & must be re-educated. https://t.co/rykCF9556X

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/12 This classified strategy contains numerous parallels to documents from AFL’s #DeepStateDiaries, including the revelation that the “intelligence experts” group, led by John Brennan and James Clapper, suggested that DHS use people’s military and religious affiliations as indicators that they could be domestic terrorists.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 Under the Brennan-Clapper committee’s approach to national security, when all else fails, DHS should use being “in the military” or “religious” to profile people and tag them as having  “indicators of extremists and terrorism” as a pretext to allow DHS to spy on them. https://t.co/f2ucWhFgAW

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /13 The left tried to use this same tactic to smear now-Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, before his confirmation, suggesting he could be a white supremacist for having a tattoo of a cross. https://t.co/s4BQ5wMd45

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /14 On the left is an excerpt from the classified plan from 2021. On the right is an excerpt from the DHS meeting minutes from 2023. They are the same playbook. https://t.co/wj4cEzrRDJ

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /15 The Biden Administration’s classified surveillance plan also appears to be the beginning of its push to label all domestic terrorists as “right wing” and threats to “public health.” https://t.co/hxhT2acDOF

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /16 Two years later, in a DHS “intelligence experts” group meeting, an unidentified member said this public health reclassification was important, so that mothers and teachers would feel more comfortable turning in their kids to authorities.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/11 The very next speaker proposed another solution: reclassify “concerning” behavior into the “public health catcher’s mitt” so that “mother[s] and teacher[s]” feel comfortable coming forward. https://t.co/qQa40k0g5p

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/17 The Biden Administration’s classified censorship and surveillance strategy makes clear that the administration meant it when it said this was a “whole-of-government approach.” The same concepts and buzzwords throughout this implementation plan are used repeatedly in documents from the DHS “intelligence experts” group, which AFL sued and successfully disbanded.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨 New docs reveal DHS intel group proposed: ✔️Americans should report their neighbors to the feds ✔️Reclassifying political dissent under the guise of “public health” so that “mothers and teachers” feel comfortable coming forward #DeepStateDiaries PART 1: https://t.co/oo5zP88uYo

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /18 The Biden Administration’s classified censorship and surveillance strategy outlines a plan to “share transnational approaches, good practices, and lessons learned” with “multilateral” meetings and “foreign government[s].” https://t.co/4ve0Ei2THu

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /19 AFL exposed that the Biden Administration hosted the UK Government’s “Counter Disinformation Unit” in 2021 to share its recommendations to censor speech with the White House during a meeting with the National Security Council.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨🗣️EXCLUSIVE — FOREIGN COLLUSION TO CENSOR AMERICAN SPEECH: New docs from litigation against the CDC reveal the Biden-Harris White House hosted the “Counter Disinformation Unit” from the U.K. gov’t in 2021 to learn about their recommendations to censor speech. 🧵THREAD: https://t.co/bZ9H8gYQec

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /20 The Biden Administration’s classified censorship and surveillance strategy also emphasizes the importance of “increasing faith in democracy and the government,” another recurring theme in documents released in AFL’s #DeepStateDiaries. https://t.co/PnFFyIT3zH

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /21 Two years later, Brennan and Clapper’s “intelligence experts” group discussed how DHS could “quietly make democracy work” and use covert messaging campaigns to get the American public to feel certain ways about issues. https://t.co/MD6yYF6LEF

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /22 The Biden Administration’s classified censorship and surveillance plan also calls for maximum law enforcement action against domestic terrorism crimes. https://t.co/OEtvzkAzAa

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /23 Domestic terrorists — like those setting fire to Tesla dealerships, burning governors’ mansions, and engaging in political violence — should absolutely be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /24 This top-secret plan was created by the same administration that released the infamous October 4 DOJ memo labeling concerned parents at school board meetings as “domestic terrorists.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1 Three years ago today Attorney General Garland issued a memo weaponizing the entire DOJ against parents for speaking out at school board meetings. With @DefendingEd we created a detailed timeline and are revealing shocking new details and context about the weaponized DOJ.🧵 https://t.co/RwtkMWdAE3

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /25 The same administration that labeled Trump supporters as domestic terrorists — while turning a blind eye to pro-Hamas vandals and rioters in cities and on college campuses across the country, actively spewing hatred, engaging in violence, and supporting actual terrorists.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — We just sued Biden’s Department of Education for obstructing records on pro-Hamas college rallies including foreign extremists. Many of these radical students are here on F-1 student visas. Deport. Hamas. Sympathizers. THREAD: https://t.co/t8BpOWkMFI

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /26 The Biden Administration weaponized the entire intelligence apparatus — the NSC, ODNI, CIA, FBI, DOJ, and the State Department — to target, censor, and silence the very people it was responsible for protecting.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@DNIGabbard @MikeBenzCyber /27 AFL will continue fighting to expose and dismantle the left’s weaponization of our intelligence community against the American people.

nataliegwinters
Posted - July 10, 2025 at 9:54 PM
Saved - July 11, 2025 at 6:04 AM

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

🚨 Former USAID employees admit they’re using Color Revolution tactics to oppose MAGA. They’re using CIA sabotage plans, underground networks, and calling for nationwide strikes. https://t.co/H3bxWdzchc

Video Transcript AI Summary
USAID and State Department officials are allegedly using skills developed over decades to undermine Trump's power, according to anonymous and on-the-record sources. These officials, some currently employed by the federal government, are reportedly frustrated after the disbanding of USAID and are now engaging in "minor acts of rebellion" within the office, aiming for a nationwide general strike. They are allegedly hosting secret workshops promoting "noncooperation" and circulating a CIA pamphlet called "Simple Sabotage." The speaker claims foreign interventionism has been a training ground for tactics now deployed domestically. This apparatus, funded by taxpayer dollars to influence foreign elections, is now being turned inward. A new group called Democracy Aid is holding invite-only workshops for federal employees, shifting from salvaging foreign assistance to redeploying it inside the U.S. The Brennan Center, linked to Judge Mershon's daughter and funded by Soros, released a poll about election officials fearing politically motivated investigations. Norm Eisen, an architect of USAID and State Department color revolutions, is allegedly behind a lawsuit challenging Trump's policies on birthright citizenship.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From notice. This isn't war room. This is a direct quote. The story titled Trump fired them. Now they're plotting to stop him, and I guess we'll continue with the I know paraphrasing just directly quoting because it's so diabolical, quote, USAID and the state department are now reapplying the skills and knowledge they built up over decades to undermine Trump's power. Now this piece goes extensively reported several, quote, several officials anonymous and on the record, including people who are currently employed by the federal government, getting your taxpayer dollars working under president Trump as saying, quote, get ready for this. They were so quick to disband USAID, the group that supposedly supposedly instigates color revolutions, but they've done a very foolish thing. You just released a bunch of well trained individuals into your population. If you kept our offices going and had us play solitaire in the office, you might have been safer to keep your regime. Now from a language we've got a lot of action going on, but from a, I would say, analytical analysis of what they're talking about, this is not democracy activists talking about their different worldview or being apoplectic over tariffs. These are people who are using, in some cases, kinetic tactics to oppose president Trump and his administration. And to that point, they're actually hosting, as highlighted in this article, secret workshops promoting a tactic they called noncooperation. Again, a direct quote from one of these sources. Quote, they're building a network of government workers willing to engage in even minor acts of rebellion in the office, and they're planting the seeds of what they hope could become a nationwide general strike. And the go to document that they're circulating and using to buttress a lot of these activities, well, you probably wanna believe me or you think I'm joking, but I'm not. It's a quote, an old CIA pamphlet with allies who still work in the government called simple sabotage. And before we get into that, I know Mike Benz is gonna have a lot of thoughts on that. Let us just case closed. I think War Room's theory of the case that there's no meaningful distinction between domestic policy and foreign policy, and frankly, all of these foreign wars, these mass foreign surveillance states, the foreign interventionism really has only just been a really training ground, a test run for the tactics that they wanted to deploy, fine tune them, and hone them in here in The United States. And through a lot of these quotes and these programs, right, the idea that the people who carried out color revolutions, regime change, pro democracy movements, choose whatever euphemism you want, that those people are now turning inwards, right, not focusing on saving those countries, but instead weaponizing those tactics here in The United States proves not only that the deep state exists, I think we're far long gone past that, but that USAID, the state department, this foreign global apparatus really has been ground zero in the hotbed of so much of that resistance against president Trump. Now I wanna read some more quotes. You know, rarely do we quote legacy media outlets in the war room, but it's important to understand the enemy. And I say the enemy because this is not just, you know, highfalutin MSNBC rhetoric. This is calls for kinetic action. Quote, widespread practice of simple sabotage will harass and demoralize enemy administrators and police. The saboteur may have to reverse his thinking. Where he formerly thought of keeping his tools sharp, he should now let them grow dull. Services that formerly were lubricated should now be sanded, normally diligent. He should now be lazy and careless. And I guess we're supposed to, what, believe that those very same people had nothing to do with the not one, but two attempts on president Trump's life. They actually have a new group called Democracy Aid, where they're having, quote, invite only workshops with federal employees who hear about them from their friends where they've, quote, shifted from salvaging the foreign assistance infrastructure to redeploying that inside The United States. Let that sink in. The global apparatus that your tax dollars were used to set up to influence elections abroad are now being turned inward in a circular firing squad to come after the president that you voted for in the administration that you elected. And they're so bold, brave, and brash that they're willing to to quote to be quoted on it in the media. Also flagging no conspiracies, no coincidences, the Brennan Center, that was one of the consulting firms and weird think tanks that, of course, none other than judge Mershon's daughter was busy consulting on behalf of they receive a ton of Soros money. They put up a poll today that about half of all election officials and election workers are, and I quote, quote, concerned about politically motivated investigations. Well, to that, I would say, you probably should be. And if you're worried about an investigation, probably means you did something wrong. And, of course, today, you saw the sweeping idea, right, that president Trump can't institute anything related to revoking birthright citizenship, sort of doing it through a class action lawsuit instead of the nationwide injunctions, right, kinda overruling what the supreme court did. Well, guess who was behind that lawsuit? None other than Norm Eisen, one of the lead architects of everything USAID and state department and color revolutions abroad.
TheIntelSCIF
Posted - September 18, 2025 at 10:52 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 1:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that ballistics provide undeniable evidence, while people can be deceptive. I'm questioning the absence of the autopsy and ballistics report, as well as whether the wound was an entrance or exit. The FBI's lack of transparency is damaging their credibility and eroding public trust. I find it suspicious that we haven't seen more evidence, including videos or photos. There are unsettling implications about individuals within our intelligence agencies, especially after the release of the secret NSA chat logs, which reveal disturbing ideologies among some members.

@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF

BALLISTICS don't lie, people do. Where is the autopsy and the ballistics report? Was it an entrance or an exit wound? The FBI continues to hurt themselves by not releasing more credible evidence. Things need to change to bring back trust. Where is the round? Where are the other videos or photos? The George Zinn fellow has to be one of the strangest and has spy or asset written all over him, especially from his past. We just want answers, there are too many odd happening that just don't make sense and when we don't get them, you create the suspicion yourself. Do we have people in our own agencies who were aware of what was going to take place? We know their are members of these bizarre ideologies and cults in our NSA, CIA, and FBI, just from the secret NSA chat logs that were released by DNI Dir. Tulsi Gabbard. The conversation taking place while on the clock that were exposed from people in our own intelligence agencies were absolutely horrifying and off the wall that there are these type of people with access to some of the most sophisticated technology, information, and weapons in the world in our own government. Look up the "Secret NSA chat logs" and read the actual conversations to understand how we are infiltrated by some of the most anti-American, alarming and bizarre ideological belief people in our own government spy agencies. cc: RealLindellTV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says 'The FBI continues to destroy its reputation as a trustworthy investigative agency' and questions Charlie Kirk's death: 'Was it a 30 odd six round that killed Charlie Kirk or a different kind of bullet? Was it a Mauser rifle that was used?' They ask why the Utah Valley campus crime scene is not secure and link it to the pattern after the Butler rally. Zeb Boykin, a former marine sniper, claims 'I do believe I know where the bullet ended up' after analyzing footage. He notes a ricochet off water bottles or a table, two frames showing 'the bullet on exit,' and that it 'would hit the building.' He cites rapid cleanup, 'a 20 foot ladder on the window,' window repairs, and a tampering video with a man in black directing people as attention shifts upward. ER nurses identify an exit wound; 'the ballistics don't lie.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The FBI continues to destroy its reputation as a trustworthy investigative agency. Basic questions have not been answered, and basic information cannot be provided to the public. Was it a 30 odd six round that killed Charlie Kirk or a different kind of bullet? Was it a Mauser rifle that was used? Nobody knows yet. And why is the crime scene at Utah Valley's campus not secure? Why would the crime scene be turned into a construction site so quickly? That tells you something's wrong here. Something is very, very wrong. It all fits a familiar pattern. It's the same pattern we saw after the Butler rally for Trump almost fourteen months ago when the FBI cleaned off the roof where Thomas Crooks was found. Joining me now is a former marine sniper, Zeb Boykin, who has analyzed the ballistics from the video in Utah and who might have just found the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk. His podcast channel is called outside the Overton. I have posted it on my ex. You should check it out. Hello, Zeb. I reposted your your episode from your podcast yesterday. It caused quite Speaker 1: a stir. Yes, ma'am. It it had picked up on YouTube, and I need to I I expected a little traction. I didn't expect all of this. But thank you for having me. Yeah. So I've been getting bombarded with a ton of, new information, and people kinda pointing out things. You know, some good, some bad. It lines up. It doesn't line up. Whatever. I kinda sift through it, and that's what I've been doing over the last, I don't know, twenty four hours. Like you said, I do believe I know where the bullet ended up. And so we can go through this since you gave me full screen. I'll go back into this. We'll take a look at it real quick. This is a HD footage that probably the best footage that we've gotten so far. And so I'm a go through it. This is the same one that caught the flash up here. It's just in a right here. So this is anomaly. And and like I said in the video, I'll grant you that maybe it is just an anomaly, which is fine. But the problem is eight frames later, we have Charlie Kirk. Right? We have eight frames later, Charlie Kirk, and then we have what I believe to be the the the bullet on exit. And you say it's going the wrong way, and I would agree with you. Right? Here's the bullet on exit. We have two separate frames of this bullet on exit. And so you say, where would it come from? Is it is it just coming out the side? If it came out the front, why would it go back? And I would say, would agree with you. The problem is I do have footage that I don't have pulled up right now where it's essentially ricocheting either off of the water bottles or off of the table or something metal on the table. I can't I can't confirm right now. But there are two frames with a a bullet or a projectile or a dot that that appears in the perfect frame that would be. There's just too many coincidences. Whoever grabbed this footage, shout out to the m hero. And so we're gonna go back. And so what we see is, like I said, this this projectile is moving this way. And you say, well, wouldn't it hit the building? And I would say, yes. Yes. It would hit the building. It would probably hit the building somewhere around here. Right? So if we have this direction, this is a video real quick. Right? That direction will pull up this. This is aftermath. Why are they cleaning up so fast? Everybody wants to ask, why are they cleaning up so fast? If I'm right, which, well, I think I am, and a lot of people do that don't block me, feds. Anyway, why do we have a 20 foot ladder on the window? Why are we repairing a window post trolley curve? Like, it doesn't make any sense. Why are we reaching up there? And so I would follow that up with, we have the tampering video. We have the tampering video. Everybody wants to focus on the guy tampering. Well, granted, yes, we probably should, but maybe we should also focus on the guy behind him, if you will. Just follow the guy behind him, black shirt. What's he doing? Tell him what what was that? We have him telling people, go back. Get away. Get away. What's up there? What's what are we getting away from? And then about five or six seconds later, he starts pointing up, pointing up to that same window that we have right here. He's standing here telling people get away from down here. Here's your window. This is aftermath. This is tampering video. Everybody can go back, double check everything I have here. It it it is what it is. I you know, I I don't wanna be in this position. I'm not a gun tuber. I'm not a ballistics I don't try to do this ballistics thing. I haven't even mentioned my marine or scout sniper status since I've been since I've started the the podcasting, newscasting, whatever you wanna call it. I I just don't wanna lean on it. I I don't think credibility is very valuable nowadays, but here we are. The problem is I don't need the credibility to prove what I'm showing you right now. You you can remove everything I have, but the evidence is believable. And so this is what we have. We have Charlie Kirk here, Ricochet off of here on back up in this direction. It is what it is. That's what we have. Speaker 0: I wanna point out you so your video, I've watched a lot of them. Obviously, I'm not an expert. And like you said, the connotation of the word expert and credibility has lost its meaning, right, post COVID. Especially too, when we're listening to what the FBI is trying to tell us. One of your episodes was called The FBI is Lying. I agree with you. Something you pointed out that I'd seen from some first responders doing videos, and nurses who have experience with triage, emergency room experience, was what the wound looked like, right? And you actually, in your video, you did the comparison of bullet sizes, and how that would compare to wound sizes, and that's something that I had seen from several other people in different fields that would know, like the medical field. I saw particularly one nurse say, who worked in emergency, say, this looks more like an exit wound to me. That's the conclusion you arrived at as well. Right? Speaker 1: I I mean yeah. I mean, the nurses, especially ER, would be able to kinda lean creatures to that. I would say an amateur hunter would be able to explain that to you also. Right? If you if they shoot a deer, you're not gonna find the inter wound until you shave it off and you actually go through it. The exit wound is obviously on the back end. I pulled up pistol rounds. It's the same thing as evident in the sniper rounds depending on size, depending on how it's how it's built, if it's hollow point, if it's not, if it's a rip round or whatever they have built in. But yeah. I mean, it's it's so obviously an exit round. I don't I don't understand how people are coming to the conclusion that it's an entry round unless they just assume that the FBI is telling the truth, which I think baseline across the board, everybody everybody should agree to that. And so this is a problem is that I would like to believe the FBI, but they're just incompetent. And if this is a cover up, the cover up is more incompetent than the FBI has been in the last, what, six months, however long the, Trump administration has been going on. I mean, if if you want me to trust the plan or whatever, call me. Tell me the plan. May maybe I won't tell anybody. I don't know. I don't know. But this is but this is the problem is that they're they're quite obviously lying, and, well, the ballistics don't lie.
DataRepublican
Posted - November 9, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Saved - November 10, 2025 at 9:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a major breaking claim: international actors are involved in a State Department–led color revolution. In a recorded call, ex-USAID employees say they moved internal groups off government systems to encrypted Signal chats, then linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. They frame it as a “global anti-authoritarian movement,” coordinating with Johns Hopkins and international democracy spaces to mobilize across borders against domestic authoritarianism. I’ll continue.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

🧵🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution 🚨🚨 This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call. Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into encrypted Signal chats, then quickly linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at creating a color revolution isn't new news; this part was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year. But what's not reported is the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames it as "a global anti-authoritarian movement," connecting U.S. officials with "colleagues from around the world who have dealt with this directly." They reference coordination with Johns Hopkins, "international democracy and conflict mitigation spaces," and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism. At what point does this become treason? As always, patience as I pull together this thread. 👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
For context, USAID has been around for more than sixty years with bipartisan support, earmarks in every budget, and a workforce of about 10 to 14,000 staff, plus roughly $40,000,000,000 in procurement each year. We read Project Twenty Twenty Five and felt somewhat prepared for this administration in some ways, but not in others. Ahead of the inauguration, the Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI), which works in countries transitioning from authoritarian or wartime to more peaceful and structured governments, was a major player and had organized during the previous administration to respond to threats to U.S. democracy. Also notable to our group, including our gender and sexual minorities employee resource group, is that we had moved our group away from the USAID main systems into Signal chats to protect the community there. January 20, the inauguration, brought one of 200 executive orders to stop foreign assistance, creating a ninety-day pause on all funding. In addition, there were executive orders to stop DEI programming, which affected a large number of our awards immediately. In that first week, we experienced threatening emails across staff, a takeover of the DEIA, truth@opm.gov email address, which was unusual in its centralization to all government staff, and many staff under a particular hiring mechanism were immediately put on furlough or laid off. I am part of that hiring mechanism. Within that initial period, over the weekend, our senior staff, including our general counsel, were put on administrative leave. In response, we moved quickly to establish the USAID stop work order website and a Signal group, organized by a longtime implementing partner and strategic communications specialists. They moved immediately to begin gathering people, creating community, and collecting information. This is also when some of the first lawsuits began to be discussed. In the second weekend, additional Signal groups were stood up. USAID is an agency of about 10 to 14,000 people within the United States, and we have about 50,000 people who are hired into the ecosystem of awards and grants contracted by USAID. This community began gathering in Signal, especially as disinformation about USAID emerged from X (Elon Musk’s platform) and escalated attacks. In that second week after the administration, almost all USAID staff were put on administrative leave, including our ethics lawyers, our HR, and our security. DOES took over, and our buildings were closed. By February 5, we had our first large-scale protest organized, with several congressional leaders standing up with us along with agency leadership. Many developments followed, and I will discuss those next.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That quick recap of what is that timeline. So for the US Agency for International Development, just to put it into scope and scale, it has been around for more than sixty years. It has been had bipartisan support, strong bipartisan support. It has had earmarks in every budget. So this was a well established agency of some 10 to 14,000 staff, $40,000,000,000 in procurement every year. We had all read project twenty twenty five. We were somewhat prepared for this administration and in other ways not prepared at all. So ahead of the inauguration, some groups such as our office of transition initiatives, which works specifically in countries, in places that are transitioning from perhaps authoritarian governments or, you know, wartime into more peaceful and structured, hopefully, democratic governments. OTI has been a major player, so they preorganized because as Danielle said, they had organized during the previous Trump administration, to respond to threats to our US democracy. Also, terribly organized that I'm proud about is our gender and sexual minorities employee resource group. We are a cautious community, and well prepared, for we saw the writing on the wall and the attacks that were already happening during, the election cycle. And so we had already moved our group away from the USAID main systems into signal chats to protect our community there. January 20 happens. Inauguration, one of the 200 executive orders was to stop foreign assistance. So that was a ninety day pause on all funding. In addition to that, I think we're well aware of that there are other executive orders to stop DEI programming, which affected a large number of our, awards immediately. So in that first week, we experienced a lot of threatening emails, across the staff, a takeover of what was it? DEIA, truth@opm.gov, which was unusual to have centralized emails sent to all government staff. And then many staff who are under a particular hiring mechanism, in that first week were immediately put on furlough or laid off. I am a part of that hiring mechanism. Then within that, at the very beginning of I think over the weekend of that first week, our senior staff, including our general counsel, were put on administrative leave. So we, leave, so we had decapitation of the agency leadership. But as I said, we were responding quickly and immediately we had what's called the USAID stop work order website and signal group, was stood up. This was done by a longtime implementing partner, who are strategic communications specialists, and they went and moved immediately to start gathering people, creating community, and collecting information. This is also when, you know, some of the first lawsuits that I'll talk about will get started. Within that second weekend, there were more signal groups stood up. Like I said, this is an agency of about 10 to 14,000 people within The US. We have about 50,000 people who are hired into the ecosystem of awards and grants that are contracted by USAID. And so this community started really gathering in signal, especially as we, saw the disinformation about USAID coming out of x as Elon Musk ex escalated attacks. In that second week after the administration, the all almost all of USAID staff was put on administrative lead, including our ethics lawyers, our HR, security. So this was really when, DOES took over, closed our buildings. In that February 5, we had our first large, scale protest organized in which several congressional leaders stood up with us along with agency leadership. Many, many things have happened. I'll talk about that next, but we do
KanekoaDaGrate
Posted - December 12, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Saved - December 16, 2025 at 11:54 PM

@KanekoaDaGrate - KanekoaDaGrate

No, that’s not ‘her job’. If it WAS her job, I wouldn’t have spent the last four years on here doing HER JOB FOR HER, and at an insanely high level that neither she nor ANY of her colleagues are collectively capable of. And doing it damn near for FREE.🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/DXM4dTISoY

DataRepublican
Posted - April 21, 2026 at 3:05 AM
Saved - April 21, 2026 at 5:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I say Pete Hegseth is targeted because he's between Trump and a coup. Institutions are named, a color-revolution playbook cites security-force defections as key. Maria Stephan runs Horizons Project; a domestic version trains defection. A memo flags Hegseth as insider threat; others urge officers to refuse illegal orders. The goal, I argue, is removal and replacement with someone we can co-opt.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup @PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that Donald Trump challenged and exposed flaws in the existing international order. They describe the order as failing and continuing to fail, naming institutions and groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, DC, and the Brookings Institution as types associated with it. The speaker suggests that these foreign-policy elites were never told that their wars were stupid, that their generals were losers, or that NATO did not step up, and that China would unleash a virus, which the speaker labels the "China virus." The implication is that these criticisms were aimed at holding the international order to account for its perceived failures. The speaker contends that the failures of the international order have been highlighted or amplified by the regime currently in the White House, describing this regime as a strong advocate for the failing order. In the context of Ukraine, the speaker frames the situation as Donald Trump engaging in a strategy against Putin by supporting Zelensky, effectively stating that the conflict is a way for Trump to fight Putin through Zelensky. The speaker concludes with the claim that they believe people who oppose the order are finding a war that they “absolutely love,” implying enthusiasm for the ongoing conflict as a form of triumph or validation of their stance against the established international system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump threatened the the international order, council on foreign relation, Washington DC, Brookings Institute types. They were never told their wars were stupid or their generals were losers or that NATO didn't step up, that China would unleash a virus. So let's call it the China virus and hold them to account for it. All of those things were a calling out of an international order that was failing and is continuing to fail and now has a great advocate in the regime currently in the White House. And Ukraine, it's basically a fight Donald Trump by fighting Putin through Zelensky war. They finally found a war they just absolutely love.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler This is not my theory. This is theirs. Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan — the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field — studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding: Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed. https://t.co/w1DND511SS

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler So what did co-author Maria Stephan do next? She became Chief Organizer of the Horizons Project. And on July 16, 2025, she trained New Kings participants on video. "Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters." https://t.co/j2R2uh0qSv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Momentum, and momentum is key to success. The third attribute of successful campaigns is they featured defections and loyalty shifts within key institutional pillars. Workers restricted their labor. Faith communities refused to allow their religion to be a tool of authoritarianism. Civil servants refused to carry out illegal orders. Businesses applied financial pressure. Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters. We're gonna talk through a lot of that tonight. Finally, successful movements have
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Momentum, and momentum is key to success. The third attribute of successful campaigns, they featured defections and loyalty shifts within key institutional pillars. Workers restricted their labor. Faith communities refused to allow their religion to be a tool of authoritarianism. Civil servants refused to carry out illegal orders. Businesses applied financial pressure. Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters. We're gonna talk through a lot of that tonight. Finally, successful movements have

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler 130,000 people are told: "When they crack and power within them shifts, the entire edifice can crumble." "They" = security forces... our military. Yes, Stefan's teachings are now informing a mass American audience that it's how you bring down a government. https://t.co/CEStbNLYeN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that security forces are responsible for executing policies and getting things done, wielding coercive power. These pillars, together with their social, political, and economic power, ultimately prop up regimes. When they crack and power within them shifts, the entire edifice can crumble. The speaker then notes, “And so the next slide, please.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are responsible for executing policies and basically getting anything done. Security forces wield coercive power. These pillars and their social, political, and economic power ultimately prop up regimes. When they crack and power within them shifts, the entire edifice can crumble. And so the next slide, please.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

It gets worse. Hardy Merriman — Gene Sharp's personal assistant, co-author of the CANVAS regime change field manual used in 50+ countries — wrote a domestic version. It says: "Those who serve in government institutions swear an oath to uphold the Constitution. They don't swear allegiance to the president himself." Then it teaches them how to defect: call in sick, work slowly, ignore orders, leak to media, publicly defy.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Now look at what their own planning document says about Hegseth. The "Democracy Playbook 2025" — the same document that teaches "dealing with security forces" and color revolution case studies — cites this in footnote 49: "Pete Hegseth had been flagged by fellow service member as possible 'Insider Threat'" — AP, November 15, 2024. 72 hours after his nomination. In a regime change manual.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Then the operation went live. November 11, 2025: The National Lawyers Guild Military Law Task Force publishes "FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders." November 12: Same group publishes a statement calling U.S. Venezuela operations "war crimes" and declaring officers "should refuse superior orders." Remember these dates.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Six days later. November 18. Six Democratic members of Congress — all military veterans — release a video telling active-duty troops: "You MUST refuse illegal orders." https://t.co/P5iQ2LFQQS

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Five of the six were recruited through a single organization: New Politics Leadership Academy. One pipeline. One talent program. Five of six. Mark Kelly was the sixth. https://t.co/Gh1cNNTwVl

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler The administration took the bait. Exactly as the playbook predicted. Trump called them "traitors" and threatened death. Hegseth opened a Pentagon investigation. Grand jury convened under 18 USC 2387... sedition. It failed. https://t.co/xgXmqde6fB

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Daniel Driscoll — Secretary of the Army — has been MORE disruptive than Hegseth. Cancelled the M10 Booker. Halted Humvee production. His confirmation vote... 66-28 versus Hegseth's 51-50. Zero organized opposition for Driscoll. Why? https://t.co/6OE6iEyJSt

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Because Driscoll is someone the system can work with. He's Yale Law with cross-partisan relationships. Like this one: Daniel Driscoll's wife donated over six thousand dollars to Maggie Goodlander, one of the Seditious Six. https://t.co/NJpeUMM2qD

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

The color revolution playbook has one tool for security forces: social pressure through professional networks to induce defection. Driscoll is embedded in those networks. He can be pulled away. Hegseth isn't. He was never attached. The system can't co-opt him... so its only option is removal. That's why Driscoll gets 16 Democratic votes and puff pieces. That's why Hegseth gets grand juries.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Yes, Braver Angels is tied. IMIP hosted a "Pre-Huddle for Braver Angels Convention" on June 13, 2024. Tabatha Pilgrim Thompson, from the Horizons Project, Maria Stephan's organization, was on the call. Watch below: https://t.co/HjP5dFau24

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that at last year’s convention they struggled with how Horizons is perceived: in bridge-building spaces they’re seen as a social justice progressive movement organization, while in movement spaces they’re seen as a bridge-building organization. This makes it hard to articulate the importance of both organizers and social movement activists, and the value of polarization in some contexts. They note that Braver Angels’ platform last year shows members agreed to include BLM activists as part of the movement for civic renewal. Vinay’s point about participatory democracy is easier to discuss and win support for, but they’re mindful that messenger matters: speaking as someone wearing a Horizons hat will land differently than others speaking in their bridge-building movement leader hats. This reflects their reflection on why they’re excited to be present and how to think about approaching these tensions, including how to balance labeling, inclusion of activists, and the messaging that resonates across different audiences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like, you know, candidly, I was struggling a little bit at the convention last year because I think, you know, horizons in general sometimes when we're in the space when we're in bridge building spaces, we're seen as a social justice progressive movement organization. When we're in movement spaces, we're seen as, like, a bridge building organization, and people aren't always quite sure where to put us, right, because we are trying to to build connections among the two. And I was really struggling to be able to kind of, like, make the case and talk about the importance of org not just organizers, but also social movement activists and how sometimes you need some of that polarization to exist. And I see that, you know, as a as a huge value And and it's one that, you know, even in the platform last year, Braver Angels measure members agreed to that we want to include, like, the BLM activists as part of this movement for civic renewal. Right? But that's where, you know, Vinay, to your point, participatory democracy piece is a lot easier to, you know, talk about and gain and win over people and gain support over than this piece. And so but I'm also very cognizant that messenger matters. And so me wearing my Horizons hat talking about that is gonna come across very differently than some of you wearing your more bridge building movement leader hats talking about these things. So that's just something that I've been reflecting on why I I was, like, really excited to to show up here today is just to try to think about, like, how can we also

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler And MWEG? Same table. Jennifer Thomas if MWEG on the IMIP call, February 2024: "We couldn't have done it without people like you." https://t.co/MUbwQFIj87

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses heartfelt gratitude, saying they couldn’t have done it without people like the audience. They emphasize that these supporters have allowed them to amplify their efforts in ways they hadn’t imagined.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Well, I can't emphasize enough. We couldn't have done it without people like you. I mean, we just couldn't have. Right? It's you've allowed us to just amplify our efforts in ways we couldn't have imagined. So And, you know

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler IMIP's Sterling Speirn responds: "If you have a Mormon Women's chapter in your community, you're going to have a little passing gear already in place." MWEG is the grassroots arm. IMIP is the coordination layer. And Maria Stephan's Horizons Project is a part of this same series. https://t.co/DTyzrvOG9i

Video Transcript AI Summary
First speaker: The discussion centers on “democracy hubs” and how their effectiveness can be enhanced by existing, community-based networks. The speaker explains that those hubs would be fortunate to have a chapter of Mormon women in their community because such a chapter would provide a natural, built-in partner. The idea is that these local hubs benefit from a ready-made “passing gear” or supportive infrastructure. The speaker lists examples of potential partnerships or coalitions: libraries with a transforming communities project, museums created by women voters, and community mediation centers. The overarching point is about aggregation and collaboration across community institutions to advance democratic engagement and civic participation. The speaker emphasizes that having a Mormon women’s chapter in a community would supply a ready-to-use set of collaborative resources, effectively accelerating the work of democracy hubs. Second speaker: Responds with a brief interjection that shifts the tone. They remark, “You’re a little bit horny. Little engine that could. I hope that doesn’t diminish you. I hope that's a compliment. Nope.” The remark suggests a provocative, informal reaction to the first speaker’s assertion, followed by a clarification that the speaker does not intend to diminish or insult, and then a negation of the compliment being taken. The exchange highlights a tension between earnest civic talk about strategic partnerships and a candid, personal aside that introduces a more informal, idiosyncratic tone to the dialogue.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Democracy hubs. And I I've often said those hubs are gonna be lucky if there's a chapter of Mormon women in their community because they'll have a natural built in partner because those local hubs are they have to see. Do I have a libraries transforming communities project? Do I have museums made by us as legal women voters doing it? Do I have a community mediation center? It's all that aggregation. But, boy, if you have a Mormon women's chapter in your community, you're gonna have, like, a little you're gonna have a little passing gear already in place for you. Speaker 1: You're a little bit horny. Little engine that could. I hope that doesn't diminish you. I hope that's a compliment. Nope.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler When Hegseth took his seat on the USIP board, the institutional home where the color revolution playbook was developed, the acting president physically barricaded the building. They sent DOGE staff, FBI agents, and DC police to get in. https://t.co/MVdcSz95F0

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

CONCLUSION: Pete Hegseth named the institutions in 37 seconds. The institutions responded with: - Pre-positioned oppo research activated in 72 hours - A regime change planning document citing him by name - A legal predicate for military disobedience published the same week as the Seditious Six video - A pipeline that produced the cohort - A grand jury they couldn't win - A replacement they CAN co-opt - Braver Angels and MWEG sitting at the same table as the color revolution coordinators - A physical barricade at the building where the playbook was written They're not trying to get rid of a bad SecDef. They're trying to remove the one obstacle that makes their entire methodology fail.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

If you appreciated this content, you will love my upcoming book - October 2026. I know it's a long way off, but we intentionally went with a small publisher to skirt censorship issues and need every preorder to launch in big chains. Books a Million: https://www.booksamillion.com/p/Unelected/Jennica-Pounds/9798901160626 Barnes and Noble: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/unelected-jennica-pounds/1149199075?ean=9798901160626 Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Unelected-Jennica-Pounds/dp/B0GGYQNWHJ

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@OGPdawg @PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Nearly every institution has been captured; that's the problem. It's easier to kidnap a Venezuelan dictator than to convict a Democrat of murder in a D.C. jury, even with a signed confession.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@OhioShermanTank @PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler You govern yourself. Do you still have children in public school? Do you still depend on CNN? Do you go to DEI training sessions? Are you stuck in a city? All these things are fixable.

View Full Interactive Feed