reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
This... https://t.co/MOWhF8NQbO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Smartwatches, although within government safety levels for radiation, can weaken muscles, including the heart and brain. Magnets placed on top of the hand strengthen the body, while magnets below the hand or on the palm weaken it. Holding phones in the palm exposes the body to magnetic fields, further weakening it. Inverting normal behaviors can lead to societal control. Some individuals have reported numbness in their arms from wearing Fitbits. Instead of smartwatches, consider wearing copper, brass, silver, crystals, or stones for piezoelectric healing properties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Radiation from a digital watch is within government safety levels, but grossly weakens the muscles. Smartwatches, You know how they always tell you about the smartwatches and you can track your steps? Well, if it weakens the body, then it's also gonna weaken the heart and gonna weaken the brain. And also magnets. This is an interesting one.
Check this. If you put magnets on top of a hand, the hand or the body becomes stronger. Okay? If we put magnets below the hand or on the palm, the hand and the body becomes weaker. How do we hold our phones?
You hold them in your palm. You don't hold them like this. You hold them in your palm. So if there's magnetic that magnetics that are taking place in your hands, the body will become weaker. As somebody just said, a weak society is an easily controllable society.
Yes. If you are inverting every single thing in which a human or a person or an animal or something is supposed to be doing and flipping it, then all of a sudden they're going to start to have issues. Somebody wrote down here, I wore a Fitbit for years and it made my arm go numb. So thankfully, I am aware enough to realize that's what it was. Yes.
Any of those smartwatches and anything, just just wear some copper or just wear some brass or wear some silver or wear a piece of, a crystal or a stone. Those are piezoelectric healing proper
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Putin has passed a law in Russia considering anyone who grows or sells genetically modified foods as a terrorist. He is encouraging Russians to grow organic, non-GMO food by giving away land. The speaker agrees with Putin's view that the West is over-vaccinated, overmedicated, and overfed with nutrient-deficient food. They mention that Monsanto's power prevents GMO labeling in Australia and the US. To ensure non-GMO food, the speaker suggests buying organic and growing your own. Organic tomatoes are said to have nine times the iron of conventionally grown ones. Genetically modified food involves splicing the DNA of different species, but it can have unknown effects on the body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that Vladimir Putin, the Russian's president, he's passed a law that any Russian who grows or sells genetically modified foods is to be considered a terrorist. He's even giving land away to Russians who will grow food organically, non GMO. You put his name and GMO in Google that and you'll read the spiel. He says, we, Russians, look across at the West over vaccinated, overmedicated, overfed, sitting in front of boxes every night in their lounge rooms, eating food that has no nutrients, he said, and we know it's weakening the west. Is he right?
Yeah. Absolutely right. Yeah. Unfortunately, Monsanto is so powerful and so wealthy and so big, they win every court case where Australians want GMO to be labeled on the products. Happens in America too.
It's unfortunate. So how do you know? Well, you don't unless you buy organic. You see, if an organic farmer uses genetically modified seed, they lose their organic status. So grow as much as you can yourself.
And the more Aussies that buy organic, the more organic will be available. One organic tomato will give you 9 times the iron of a conventionally grown tomato. See, you get much more value for your money even though organic is more expensive. Genetically modified food happens when the DNA of DNA of 2 different species are spliced together to create. For instance, DNA of a tomato with the DNA of an landed salmon hoping to create a tomato that grows in the snow, but, actually, it doesn't grow in the snow.
And it has 5 centers instead of 1 and there's all these strange things happening, and when the person eats that tomato, it breaks down to molecules that your body cannot recognize and has the ability to damage your
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Beyond Meat is being criticized as a scam, with claims of vegan propaganda and toxic substitutes. The speaker challenges viewers to identify the difference between a Beyond Meat patty and premium dog food. They argue that billionaires are promoting the vegan agenda for profit, despite potential negative effects on mental health, fertility, and testosterone levels. The World Health Organization's prediction of reduced meat consumption by 2030 is questioned, as only 11% of greenhouse gas emissions are attributed to agriculture, with beef accounting for just 3% of those emissions. The speaker urges viewers to reconsider the push for a meatless diet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Beyond Meat is a scam. Hi. I'm Shannon, and I was a victim of vegan propaganda. Let's play a game. One of these ingredients lists is a Beyond Meat patty, and the other, premium dog food.
Can you distinguish between the 2? This food revolution is so tasty, even celebrities like Kim k are jumping on board. Billionaires are pushing for the vegan agenda with toxic substitutes to replace vital edible products. Beyond Meat is cheaper to produce and way more profitable for them. We're being pushed a diet known to onset mental disorders, lower fertility and testosterone levels.
Why is this? Even the World Health Organization predicts that we'll be eating a lot less meat by 2030. They tell us that if we want to solve climate change, we must stop eating meat, and yet only 11% of greenhouse gas emissions are because of agriculture, and about 3% of those emissions are from beef. Hopefully, by now, you'll realize that.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the judiciary committee hearing, we faced some challenges. We aimed to obtain subpoenas for Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs and Sotomayor's book deal, which were not previously reported. Unfortunately, the chairman blocked our requests, which goes against the committee's intended process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, if you were not watching C SPAN and if you didn't see that judiciary committee hearing today, this was quite a mess. But we were trying to get my subpoenas of Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs and the subpoena of Sotomayor in her book deal, things that weren't reported, but we have found out about this through the news. And, of course, the chairman blocked it all, cut it off. That's not how this committee is supposed to work.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
For the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling. In the last 38 years, there has been no temperature change. Over the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods, with a total warmth increase of 0.6 degrees Celsius. The end of the Little Ice Age in 1850 marked the start of warming. Since then, we have warmed due to the Industrial Revolution. If we measure from the medieval and Roman warmings, we have actually cooled by about 5 degrees each. So, when someone says it's warming, ask them since when?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have been cooling down for the last 4000 years. So people say, Oh, the planet's warming. Well, it's all about when you start the measurements. If we look at the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. If we look in the last 150 years, we've had 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods with a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius.
Now I wonder why it warms. I mean 18 50, what happened then? Oh yes, that was the end of the little ice age. Do you think it's going to warm or cool after Little Ice Age? Of course, it's going to warm.
So if you start taking measurements from 1850 in the Industrial Revolution, we have been warming. If you take measurements from the medieval warming, we've been cooling. We've cooled about 5 degrees since then. If you take measurements from the Roman warming, we've cooled about 5 degrees. So as soon as someone tells you, oh, it's warming, the reply you give is, since when?
We have been cooling down.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
The effects of small particles and aluminum on human health if released into the stratosphere are being studied by collaborators from Carnegie Mellon. Initial calculations show no human health impact from 10 megatons of material. Research on the toxicological effects of aluminum is ongoing and has not been published yet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question is, what would be the effects of these materials on human health if they came down into the stratosphere? In particular, small particles and aluminum? So the collaborators of mine working on the aerosol scheme are actually folks from Carnegie Mellon who focused on human health impacts. And while we haven't published it, that was the very first thing we did was do the order of magnitude calculation in pencil and paper, but with an expert on human health impacts impacts about whether that could be an issue. And for aluminum or other particles, there are a lot of toxicological things that need to get looked at seriously.
But if you're just thinking about the sheer number of particles and the human health impact of small particles, the answer is, well, we haven't published yet. That was the first thing we looked at with some of the leading experts who do epidemiological research on human health impacts, and it's not even close to being initiated. Can you clarify, so 10 megatons of Kahuna dumped into the atmosphere, we have no human health impact. So let me be more careful here. We're to separate out the talks of logical so the Illumina, we've only begun to research and publish nothing.
@Yeahaboutthat3 - MoCheezePlz
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 20th century, archaeologist GE Kinkade discovered an underground Egyptian city in the Grand Canyon with advanced artifacts and hieroglyphic tablets. The Smithsonian supported his research, but it was abruptly halted due to government restrictions on the land. The findings hinted at a possible connection between Egypt, Asia, and the American Southwest, challenging conventional history. This mysterious civilization raises questions about its significance and the secrets hidden within its chambers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever heard of the underground Egyptian city in the Grand Canyon? Hidden within its vast expanse lies a secret carefully concealed from the pages of history. This is a tale of mystery, ancient civilizations, and cover ups. Let's travel back to the early 20th century. An archaeologist named mister GE Kinkade from the Smithsonian Institution embarked on a journey that would lead him to an astonishing discovery.
Setting off from Green River, Utah, Kinkade and his companion embarked on an expedition down the Colorado River documenting the unexplored terrain. It was on April 5, 1909 that the Arizona Gazette published an extraordinary article that spoke of Kinkade's findings, a lost subterranean Egyptian city buried within the Grand Canyon. Yet after this revelation, the story vanished into thin air, leaving us to wonder why. For more than 8 years, Kinkade dedicated his life to investigating this hidden city. The Smithsonian supported his quest, and he meticulously pieced together information that challenged conventional history.
He described finding several passages branching out across these caves, leading to hundreds of chambers deep within the earth. These chambers held astonishing artifacts, including objects as hard as steel and tools that showcased a level of craftsmanship unparalleled by the era's standards. Kinkade's findings hinted at a civilization of oriental origin, raising questions about a possible connection between Asia and the Grand Canyon. The mystery deepened as hieroglyphic tablets were discovered, suggesting ties to Egypt and the American Southwest. The Smithsonian's efforts led to extensive research, revealing vast chambers adorned with intricate artwork and even mummies preserved for centuries.
However, this research was swiftly terminated as access to this underground marvel was on government land. It's possible that the government preferred to keep this information from the public, altering our understanding of history. Today, we stand at a crossroads of history and mystery, leaving us to wonder about the significance of this subterranean civilization and its potential connection to Egypt and Asia.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
This 👇😳 https://t.co/JVxCt33eau
Video Transcript AI Summary
We reviewed over 2,000 pages of financial records revealing a complex network of shell companies involving Joe Biden and his family members. Evidence suggests human trafficking and financial corruption, with money flowing from various foreign countries. The investigation will uncover how the Biden family profited from Joe Biden's political influence. This information needs to be shared with the American people for transparency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We just, finished reviewing the financial records in the Treasury. What I saw was over 2,000 pages of jaw dropping information. There's basically an enterprise wrapped around Joe Biden, involving not only multiple family members more than we thought there were, but other people as well. Just a complete conglomerate of LLC shell companies where money was passing through from foreign countries, China, Ukraine, but many more countries than just those. There's a lot of information the American people deserve to know of the Biden family and the crimes they've been involved in.
And the oversight committee has a much bigger investigation to do than we ever thought was possible. I just saw evidence of human trafficking. This involved prostitutes, not only from here in the United States, but foreign countries like Russia and Ukraine. This is this is unbelievable that a president and a former vice president, not only his son, Hunter Biden, but many more family members extending past Hunter Biden and his immediate family. We're going to have to really get to work.
This is an investigation that needs to be revealed to the American people. And not only do we have questions about Hunter Biden himself, but this is going to extend into developing a web of, corruption, a web of fake companies, that's going to reveal money that came in from many foreign countries and went directly into the personal bank accounts of the Biden family, where they have financially benefited directly from Joe Biden's, seats of power. And we look forward to investigating, exposing for this this for the American people, and, and we'll see where it goes from there.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Motion picture stars are referred to as movie stars because in the Bible, stars were called lesser illuminaries. These lesser illuminaries are linked to the big Illuminati using them. Various communist leaders have been seen holding a red rose, symbolizing socialism and communism, hinting at a secret society behind them. The use of symbols like the red rose is significant, as seen in historical figures like Hitler using red and black colors. Pictures of leaders with red roses show a deeper connection to secret societies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's why motion picture stars are called movie stars because in the bible stars were referred to as lesser illuminaries. So these lesser illuminaries are working for the big Illuminati. The big Illuminati are using the lesser Illuminati. The lesser illuminaries are just stars.
Speaker 1: And we we have pictures with the president, with his hand stretched out holding a rose.
Speaker 0: A red rose. But I have about 15 major color pictures of communist leaders throughout the world, holding a red rose in their hand, and these are from newspapers and magazines. I began to pick up on this because someone alerted me to it That the symbol of the red rose in implies not only socialism and communism, but a secret society operating behind socialism and communism that
Speaker 1: uses a red rose. This way out Willie holding the rose, we find Khrushchev, We find, all the congress All the congress leaders. And then we find the president of the United States over in his early years, leading anti American demonstrations in the Soviet Union.
Speaker 0: Well, I know. But I'm saying that it's it's not enough to say these things. You really must show the pictures so that people will see that what we're talking about here are symbols and emblems. Well, even Hitler used red and black, didn't he? So he's And he's
@TheRoaringKitty - Roaring Kitty
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am a postal worker. The mail never stops, it's relentless. It piles up every day, more and more. You gotta keep delivering, but it keeps coming in. The bar code, the clearinghouse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Me ask you something. What what do you
Speaker 1: do for a living, Newman?
Speaker 0: I'm a United States postal worker.
Speaker 1: Aren't those the guys that always go crazy and come back with a gun and shoot everybody? Sometimes.
Speaker 0: Why is that? Because the mail never stops. It just keeps coming and coming and coming. There's never a let up. It's relentless.
Every day, it piles up more and more and more. You gotta get it up. And the more you get out, the more it keeps coming in. And then the bar code refrigs, and it covers his clearinghouse. Alright.
Alright. Alright.
@AwakenTFallen - 🐦⬛Awaken the fallen🐦⬛
👇🤔👇🐦⬛ https://t.co/CSZBV7bddi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transmission system outside Tromsor is part of the ACAD system, spanning Svalbard, Tromsø, Kiruna, and Sorakulla. It emits electromagnetic fields across Europe, potentially for mind control like harp. People are unaware of this manipulation, which can alter thoughts, feelings, and relationships remotely, turning individuals into biological robots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transmission system that you're going to know? That's right. It's in outside of Tromsor, the biggest type of thing, part of ACAD system. This system going from Svalbard, Tromsø, Kiruna in Sweden has the headquarters of the whole system and then in Lapland, in Finnish Lapland, in Sorakulla. And when they blast electromagnetic fields, it goes through all of Europe.
And do you think that's a form of mind control? Oh, it can be used for mind control. Of course, like harp. And that is the danger because people know nothing about mind control. They don't know that your thoughts can be changed, your attitudes, your feelings.
If you love somebody, somebody sitting at a computer, even through satellites, can say, Okay. Let's make it opposite. And you start just detesting the person who you love. You can't be in the same room, you know, you feel uncomfortable. I think this is terrible because you're making people into biological robots.
@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump
Video Transcript AI Summary
I asked my daughter not to stay up late before she was to join me for summer school. The next morning, I woke up to find her missing. Using her phone's location, I drove to a nearby skate park, where I saw police and yellow tape. My heart sank when I learned she had been strangled and left bound.
Two men, who were in the country illegally and affiliated with a violent gang, have been charged with her murder. I believe that stricter border policies could have prevented this tragedy. Kamala Harris, responsible for immigration, failed my daughter and countless others. President Trump reached out to me with condolences, and I feel he would ensure my future children’s safety in this country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sunday night, I asked her to not stay up super late because of her coming to work with me in the morning for us to do her summer school. She said, okay. I told her good night, and I love you. I went to bed, not realizing that that was gonna be the last time I saw her. We're best friends.
Yes. We're gonna go shaking again. I woke up to notice she wasn't in a bed. I'm in my heart trying not to lose my mind because I don't know where she is. I finally remembered her phone had a location on, and her phone was pinging just 2 minutes down the road right behind the skate park.
I start driving to the direction the phone was being pinged at, and I see a couple cop cars with lights on. I see yellow tape, and immediately my heart drops and sinks to the bottom of my stomach. My daughter's hands and ankles were both bound. She was strangled to death with left with no pants. And I know in my heart, she fought incredibly hard.
She was not going down without a fight.
Speaker 1: We begin with 2 men. We're learning our charge with capital murder tonight accused of killing a 12 year old girl. Police say these men strangled her before dumping her into that creek. Both men were in the country illegally. Apprehended then released by border patrol less than 3 weeks before Jocelyn's death.
The men accused of killing Jocelyn Nungare are affiliated with the gang known for brutal violence.
Speaker 0: Kamala Harris was in charge of immigration in our borders. If we had better border policies and not open borders and not these catch and release policies, I truly believe this all could have been prevented. Under her being vice president of this country, my daughter's life was ripped away from her. She had her entire life of head of her. Happy birthday, dear Jocelyn.
My daughter is 6 feet in the ground based off of policies that she allowed to keep. Kamala Harris did have one job, and she not only failed not me. She failed my daughter. She failed Jocelyn. You're like, gang in my mouth.
You know, she was only 12. Oh my god. President Trump reached out, gave me his sincerest condolences as not a former president, but as a father, someone who cares. I believe Donald Trump needs to be back in office. I can at least know that my next child will be safe in this country.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
There should have been a revolution over the ongoing issues of rape, prostitution, torture, and murder affecting our daughters. It's not just the actions of certain groups but also the cover-ups by authorities who allowed this to happen. We are treated as cattle, and when we fear them, it becomes tyranny. We need to unite and organize as a majority, as Muslims represent only 7% of the UK population. We've had enough of mass immigration and wars that we never consented to. Key decisions impacting our lives are being made without our input, which is not democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Already should have been a revolution in this country over the rape and prostitution, torture, and murder of our daughters in every town to see. Not just the fact that the Islamic gangs done. The fact that they knew about it. If they covered it up. The police forces knew about it.
Covered it up. They all let it happen. And that they say it out loud. They let a generation of our daughters be kidnapped and raped, and they did not care. We are seen by them as cattle.
Yeah. We and they do not fear us. And when we fear them, that's tyranny. When they fear us, that's democracy. Yeah.
And we need to I said, we've sat back. Back. We need to get organized. We need to unite this nation. All we're hearing about is the Muslim vote.
The Muslim vote. Well, the Muslims make up 7% of the UK. Yeah? We are a majority. We have had enough of mass immigration.
No one's asked us did we want a 1000000 people reported last year. No one asked us if we want to continually go into war. No one asked us. That's not democracy. No one's asking us the key decisions.
Yeah? The key decisions that are affecting us all.
@Ragnar71115 - Archangel Michael
Video Transcript AI Summary
In today's education, history is increasingly neglected, leading to a population that lacks national pride and awareness. Modern philosophy is criticized for promoting misguided ideas. The speaker argues against the acceptance of abortion, euthanasia, and same-sex marriage, claiming these issues stem from ignoring divine laws. They assert that the white race is being replaced and express a bleak outlook for the future. The speaker disputes the Holocaust narrative, claiming it is a fabrication and questioning the logistics of cremating six million bodies. They believe that emotional narratives overshadow evidence and lament that society prefers to live in a world of lies, failing to address the root causes of societal issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's interesting that in today's schools, the children are taught less and less history. The the one world government and the new world orders do not want people to know history. They want people to be dumb, stupid, sheep that could be led where they like with no pride in their country, no love of their country.
Speaker 1: Modern philosophy teaches nonsense, and it's very grave. And that's why this the students are faggots. And then for when some sweet, soft, mushy minded liberal says to you, oh, but the existence of God is a question of faith. No. It is not.
God's true church said the book artificialism of birth control is a very bad idea, and it's against the law of God. And if people had listened, we wouldn't have since abortion, euthanasia, same sex marriage, and all of these horrors one after another. And we'd have, a bigger number of white babies. Then there are no more white babies. The white race is being diluted and overrun, and the future looks very dark.
Oh, that's grace. You're being replaced. Germany invaded Russia in order to head off communism as enemies of communism. Nazis were enemies of communism. Communism killed 100 of millions.
Hitler allegedly killed 6,000,000 Jews. It's untrue. It's just not true. It's a fabrication. That so called holocaust is quite simply fabrication.
You can spend a couple of hours on the Internet and if you seek out the revisionist, the best revisionist, is you'll see all the evidence points one way and all of the emotion points in the other way. The the emotion fully backs. 6,000,000 Jews wickedly killed in gas chambers by the Nazis. All the emotions on one side. All the evidence is on the other.
How on earth in a couple of years do you cremate 6,000,000 corpses? It's not possible. With the number of gas evidence that they had at the most in in at Auschwitz or anywhere. The evidence is just absolutely against every time. But minds no longer run on evidence.
People's minds today are gone. If you got a half a brain in your head, you'll see in a short space of time that the holocaust is quite simply a fabrication. 6,000,000 gas. There wasn't one, death deadly gas chamber or there wasn't one gas chamber in in in Nazi Germany, which was killing human beings. Not one.
Yes. The lies have taken over. It's a world of lies that we're living in. And it's a world of lies that people the massive people want to live. People don't like the bad fruits, but they do like the bad roots.
So if they cut off the bad fruits, bad fruits, but don't dig up the bad roots, then the bad fruits will simply grow.
@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's an exciting time with President Trump focused on fulfilling his promises. We need a Justice Department that applies the law equally, unlike the political approach under Biden and Garland. The focus should be on traditional crime, not spying on Americans. We're seeing changes with Pam Bondi and others, targeting sanctuary cities that defy federal law.
We've curbed big tech censorship, but foreign countries are now pressuring tech companies to censor Americans. We're considering visa restrictions for those involved. Investigations are needed into the sweetheart deal for Hunter Biden, the January 6th pipe bombs, and more. The goal is transparency and accountability, answering the questions the American people deserve to have answered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister chairman, just exciting moment. We're brimming. We're brimming with excitement. It's it's it's, really it it it's really, an unbelievable timeline that we're living in.
Speaker 1: You've
Speaker 0: been on the show for years, mister chairman. It's, like, saying that this might be what happens if we get Trump elected. You've you've gotta be whistling Dixie this morning.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah. It is it is an exciting time, and you we've never seen a president with this kind of focus intensity, just this kind of effort to just do what he told the voters he was gonna do, whether it's Elon Musk working for the president on this Doge effort and and identifying all the ridiculous spending or or the things you're talking about. But but this is a great great idea. How about these the the leaders of these cities? Instead of being sanctuary cities, you actually have a mayor who's going to stop the crazy crime that takes place in all our major urban areas.
He's gonna focus on on on on helping the citizens with their better education system and everything else. How about people like that? I think that's what president Trump wants versus, oh, we're gonna be a sanctuary city. We're gonna not comply with federal law enforcement who are executing the law. We're gonna make an we're gonna be a, you know, try to stop them and prevent them from doing their job.
I think I think that's the kind of focus that people want. And frankly, people in those cities want and president Trump is trying to trying to help make that come about.
Speaker 0: Yes. So okay. Something that we haven't gotten to on the show just yet is the news that president Trump has fired now all Joe Biden federal prosecutors. These are some of the people who've been a major thorn in your paw leading the judiciary committee. Your take on this, I'd see it's gotta be welcome, but we well, I don't think we've ever seen action like this, before, certainly not in Trump's first term.
Speaker 1: Well, this is this is real basic. We want a justice department that actually gets back to the fundamental principle, equal treatment under the law. We don't want a justice department like we had under the Biden Garland, administration where they're political. And we know Jack Smith was totally political. We know what was going on with some of the political prosecutions of folks on on January who who were here on January 6, who may have inadvertently stepped across some line and then they get prosecute.
So we we know that kind of attitude out there. And what I think president Trump and the people of the justice department are doing is saying, no. We're gonna focus on equal treatment under the law, applying the law the way it's supposed to be applied, not politics, and that is welcome. And, frankly, that's what the American people voted for because they saw how political that place had become, and and the lawfare activity against the guy who was our nominee for president, who got 77,000,000 votes and is now president of The United States against president Trump. And so, I think it's welcomed by the, by the people and a good thing for following our constitution.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, Bambandi, very much like a wrecking ball. Did you hear the reports that she tore down a portrait of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris?
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 0: And what was it? Merrick Garland. Right? Yeah. That she personally did.
That there's now multiple credible reports that she did it herself and stacked them in the trash.
Speaker 1: The, the, the other thing you said, the the first day on the job, she issues the memorandum. On the second page of that memorandum, she's talking about this committee to look at the weaponization of government and particularly the justice department. And she goes bullet point by bullet point, and it's all things we had been focused on and investigating over the last congress. And it was so refreshing. In fact, I told Pam that.
I said, this is so good that memorandum you put out and the intensity and focus you are bringing to equal treatment under the law, again, is exactly what the American people wanted.
Speaker 0: So the criticism of this is gonna be, oh, you can't take away all the prosecutors. What will happen? Who will prosecute the crime? They've been doing the same thing with the FBI, right, with the, sort of the elimination of those individuals who, as you mentioned, January 6, were going after innocent Americans. You like, what's the counterbalance to that?
Right? Because that's that's the
Speaker 1: that's the that's the problem
Speaker 0: right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They have they take the FBI for an example, Vinny. The about $12,000,000,000 budget at the FBI. More than half of that money is spent on counterintelligence, intelligence, surveillance. I mean, basically, you know, looking and surveilling the American people.
More than half of the budget, half the personnel. I think the American people would kinda like an FBI that's probably focused more on traditional crime that, you know, organized crime, gang activity, money laundering, all the stuff that we typically think the FBI's child exploitation, everything else, focus on stopping that stuff versus spying on the American people. So, that's, I think, the kind of focus you're gonna see from Kash Patel when he gets confirmed and heads the FBI. That's what we want, and that's what I think American people want. So that that's that's what that's the change that I think needs to take place and is going to take place under Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche who will be deputy attorney general, and, of course, Kash Patel at the FBI.
Speaker 0: We oh, I think that the the the changes the changes, shook quite a few people. We weren't expecting that Leticia James gets, sued by the justice department on, like, day three. We weren't expecting that. And, it's, like, refreshing actually because sanctuary states are illegal. I mean, they should be illegal.
Right? Like, you you don't have a right to just defy federal law. You can just do that. You just Yep. Choose.
You're not gonna, there's no first amendment here. Right? And it's like, we're Oregon. Like, that's not how it works, actually.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and this and the situation that I think both Tom Homan and Pam Bondi have talked about where it looks like sometimes their people are tipping off, the the bad gas, the the people with a criminal background who Tom Homan is coming in to rightfully repatriate out of the country repatriate back to their their their their home country, and they're getting tipped off in it. And I think Tom Homan said, it looks like it may have been an FBI agent who did that. Well, you can't do that. That's that that's like helping the bad guys when and and and endangering law enforcement, members potentially.
So, yeah, that when you when you're doing those kind of things, I think criminal prosecution should be something that's definitely, definitely in in play.
Speaker 0: And we wanna be treason, like, you're acting against federal law enforcement and you're helping out the criminals. You're not
Speaker 1: supposed to you're not supposed to help the bad guys. And if you do, you're probably in trouble, and we should probably prosecute peoples who do those things.
Speaker 0: Alright. Let's talk about your let's talk about your potential prosecutions. Let's talk about your potential investigations. What do we have coming up on the judiciary committee? A target rich environment, I think we'd call it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, one thing on the censorship front, we think we've met we've had a huge impact there in stopping, big government and big tech and other federal government agencies and universities all working together, what Michael Shellenberger called the censorship industrial complex. We think we've really scaled that back into protecting the first amendment. But right now what's happening is in foreign countries, they're using their laws to pressure tech companies to censor Americans. And so we're gonna see if there's a way we can put some pressure on these foreign countries to, one example would be if you're you're involved in in in any way, censoring Americans, you shouldn't be able to get a visa and come to the country.
If you're someone of these foreign dignitaries who likes to come to The United States, everyone likes to come here. So that's a that's a piece of legislation one of our members has that we'll look at passing. And then on the oversight thing, we still think there's a look back that needs to happen with David Weiss, who was gonna give the sweetheart deal to Hunter Biden. We still think we don't have answers on, you know, who planted the pipe bombs on January 6, who leaked the Dobbs opinion, who put cocaine at the White House for goodness sake. I think the American people like to know those things, and they'd also like to know about what the Garland justice department was doing when they said, if you're a pro life Catholic, you're an extremist, or if you're a mom and dad at a school board meeting, we're gonna investigate you.
So we're gonna look back at all that stuff and get answers for the American people.
Speaker 0: I'd love to get an answer on something that cross our timeline. Some of your colleagues, Tom Tillis in the senate was actually, in front of an ad. I couldn't believe it when I saw it. He was in front of an ad that had an x over Elon Musk, and he said we must eliminate Elon Musk. We'll pull up the ad here and we'll pop it up on screen because it was I thought there's no way.
Here it is.
Speaker 1: There's no way.
Speaker 0: It's like it's gotta be a meme. Right? But no. It's real. And here's, your colleague, Republican in the senate saying, this is allegedly we're looking into who's funding this, but, like, help eliminate Elon Musk with a crossover his face and a USAID logo on the bottom.
And this is being of course, you can't just advertise somebody has to approve these advertisements.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Who's approving these advertisements exactly? It looks like an open threat against a member of the administration. This is insane.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Again, Democrats, Democrats will will attack the guy who's exposing the stupid spending instead of trying to stop the stupid spending. It makes no sense to me. And they're they're over the last, what, two weeks, it's been one one theme, one message from the Democrats, go after Elon Musk. Even though the president told us as as we've said before, told us that when he when he was running for the job, I'm gonna have Elon Musk head up this this Doge, group who's gonna go through agency by agency in the federal government, identify stupid things we're spending taxpayer money on.
And when he identifies those things, the Democrats says, oh, we gotta get rid of Elon Musk. What? That makes no sense. It's I I think, again, we're the party of common sense as the president, always says. I think the American people see this as good common sense governance and are not gonna be supportive of the left who continues to attack, Elon Musk.
I think he's doing the Lord's work. I know he did when he bought remember when he said when he bought Twitter? He said, like, I didn't spend $44,000,000,000 to buy Twitter. I spent $44,000,000,000 to save the first amendment and free speech for goodness sake, and he's been an integral part of the effort to protect the First Amendment. And now he's gonna try to protect us from having these bureaucrats who think they're smarter than you and I and all your viewers and listeners think they're smarter than the rest of us, protect us from the stupid things they wanna spend our money on.
Speaker 0: So it'd be nice it'd be nice to close down the government caves. Didn't know that, didn't know the feds on tricycles in limestone caves was how, retirements were processed. Did did you know that, congressman?
Speaker 1: I did not. I did not know that.
Speaker 0: Is that exciting exciting thing you learned this week?
Speaker 1: I did yeah. I didn't know we were spending money for what some trans comic can perform opera or whatever in Ireland. I didn't know we were spending money to put Bert and Ernie and Big Bert on Baghdad TV. And you're like, what the heck? Heck?
Speaker 0: It's true. What the heck? It's crazy. It's true.
Speaker 1: But oh, no. No. No. It's not that. That's not the problem.
The problem is Elon Musk. That that that that makes no sense. No sense to to the folks I get the privilege of representing in the Fourth District Of Ohio. They're on the Elon Musk's side.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. I mean, it's it just but just as since we named Robert, if you if you would please allow us, here's a photo of the special special tricycles. These are tricycles that the feds drive around. They ride around on them all day.
We pay them salaries and then, massive retirement pensions to ride around on tricycles all day inside of the caverns of an old limestone man to handle retirement paperwork by hand and store them in boxes.
Speaker 1: This
Speaker 0: is what we pay for in the era of AI.
Speaker 1: Go figure. Go figure. Yeah.
Speaker 0: In conclusion, we did hear, from somebody I know that you're very close with, James Comer and Anaplena Luna, this past week. They both been on the program, and then we covered live their announcement of sort of a massive declassification operation. I'm sure you're in favor of that. You've often been on the show talking about it. Can you give us kind of an update?
Is this even something that is feasible? We've you've held up the black line paper before. You've been, like, you've come on the program and held out, like, these just black ink blots. And, like, what what's to give us any hope that that we'll be able to punch past that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think I think the main hope is is in the White House. President Trump has indicated he wants the American people to have transparency and understand what what happened with some of these situation with with with the the tragic assassination of of, JFK, and and other issues. So, yeah, let's let's get the facts out there. Our government has information.
We're gonna work with with, in the in the justice department. We're gonna work with, Pam and, Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and and and Todd Blanch, the deputy attorney general, and Cash, to get information on on things, as I said before, that we want that we think the American people still have questions about. So we wanna get those answers. And, the same with, with chairman Comer and representative, Ana Paulina Luna, they wanna get answers to the American people. So the more folks the more you can focus in on it.
I mean, we're seeing this with Elon Musk. There have been organizations who've highlighted the stupid spending in the past. Citizens against government waste has done good work over, you know, the last forty years highlighting the pork book and all the stupid spending. But when you have an intense focus and it was an element of the campaign and a presidential race, that's when you can really highlight it and you get the media attention and the focus of the American people. That's when you can make a difference.
So any effort that adds to the the attention and and focus on an issue helps us get the answers, and that's what chairman Comer and representative Anna Paulino Luna are up to.
Speaker 0: Don't understand it. I I'd say it probably wants to show. Why does our federal government spend so much time and resources protecting pederists? I don't get it, mister I don't. I said this is Jeffrey Epstein.
He's already been he was found guilty of these things, yet we spend all of these resources protecting the client list and everybody who was involved. That doesn't make any sense to me. I'm just I'm just a dumb Midwesterner, you know. I guess I don't.
Speaker 1: You got common sense. Common sense. That's what you are from the nook ass.
Speaker 0: Too many questions. Yeah. That's right. Everybody needs, obviously, if you're not already following Jim Jordan, you're crazy. Okay?
You're living in one of the limestone caves where the government does its retirement. And you're also by following Jim Jordan, who has more followers than us on x, very humbling, 6,000,000 followers on x, you're missing out on the man who actually saved Facebook from itself, and it's something that we haven't gotten a chance to thank you for live. Thank you. Mark Zuckerberg specifically citing your, investigation into Facebook and censorship, saying this is why we've decided to destroy all of our censorship policies because of Jim Jordan. And so thank you, mister chairman.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Thanks for all the good work you do.
Speaker 0: Alright. Godspeed.
@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Five billion people on the planet got a vaccine of some sort.
- If you apply the range of the death rate in The US that I gave you earlier, you get a range of globally seven point three million to fifteen million died from the vaccine.
- That Seven million to fifteen million.
- There's been a study by Dennis Rancourt; we've looked at his methodology. It's different than what we do. We're not saying it's wrong. It's it's an estimate.
- And he came up with seventeen million.
- So our upper our upper range is right there with Dennis Rancourt.
- Twenty nine to sixty million disabled globally.
- Injuries, if you take eighteen percent of the vaccinated using the Pfizer, so that again, this could be money, but we get a range of, at the high end, 900,000,000, 500,000,000 at the low end Injured.
- Dollars 500,000,000 to $900,000,000 who had an injury that has not disabled.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Five billion people on the planet got a vaccine of some sort. If you apply the range of the death rate in The US that I gave you earlier, you get a range of globally seven point three million to fifteen million died from the vaccine. That Seven million to fifteen million. Yeah. And so let's let's there's been a study by Dennis Rancourt.
He we've looked at his methodology. It's different than what we do. We're not saying it's wrong. It's it's it's it's an estimate. And he came up with seventeen million, which I think you talked about.
So our upper our upper range is right there with Dennis Rancourt. Okay? Disabilities, when you look at the ratio of four to one, you multiply the seven million and the 15 possibly 15,000,000 times four, you did a range of 29 to let me see. I gotta look at the numbers. Twenty nine to sixty million disabled globally.
Okay? Twenty nine to sixty million disabled globally. Correct. And then injuries, if you take eighteen percent of the vaccinated using the Pfizer, so that again, this could be money, but we get a range of, at the high end, 900,000,000, 500,000,000 at the low end Injured. Dollars 500,000,000 to $900,000,000 who had an injury that has not disabled.
Yes.