reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@MeasslainteIE - Thomas Anthony ≋T≋A≋E≋
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kevin McKernan, an experienced genomic expert, discusses his findings regarding mRNA vaccines. He discovered that the expression vectors for the vaccines are still present in the vials, exceeding the guidelines set by the EMA and FDA. These vectors, derived from E. Coli, can be challenging to remove and may lead to residual plasmids in the vaccines. McKernan's team designed quantitative PCR assays that confirmed the presence of the vectors in the vaccines. The CT values obtained were consistently above the recommended limits. This poses a significant concern as the contamination levels are much higher than those found in COVID diagnostic tests. McKernan urges others to replicate his work using the publicly available primer sequences to gain a better understanding of the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Next is mister Kevin McKernan. Thank you. I have no conflicts to disclose. I have 25 years of experience in the genomic space. I've worked as a team leader of R&D at the Human Genome Project at Whitehead, MIT.
And I have over 57,000 citations to publications, in my space in multiple patents on on PCR and sequencing. Next slide, please. No conflicts. Next slide. In February, I used mRNA vaccines as the spike in control for some RNA sequencing libraries, and, to my shot, discovered that the expression vectors for the Vaccines are still in the vials.
I looked at this in over a dozen vials, and it appears that this expression vector is above the EMA guidelines and the FDA guidelines. You can see this in this preprint that's described here. Next slide. As a refresher, there's 2 different processes that have been discussed in this BMJ article. The clinical trials running process 1, which uses in vitro transcription off of synthetic DNA, but they switched to process 2 for a scale up, which used E.
Coli to amplify plasmids. And those plasmids are what still remain in the vials, and we're not within the clinical trial. Next slide. This is another depiction of this process. You can see getting plasmids out of these E.
Coli is a challenge and can sometimes lead to residual plasmids inside the vaccines. Next slide. These are the expression vectors that we discovered on the left in Pfizer vaccines. They also exist in the Moderna vaccines, but they're a little bit different. The Pfizer vaccines specifically have this SV 40 promoter, which was not disclosed in the expression vector map that was given to the FDA, or I'm sorry, the EMA, but the expression factor has a 3 44 base pair promoter with a nuclear localization signal known as this SV40 promoter.
Next slide. So we want to verify this by designing quantitative PCR assays that target the spike sequence and the vector sequence. Next slide. And this work demonstrated that, with even 1 to 100 dilutions, you could get CTs of 22 for the DNA that's in these vials for the vector, which is not part of, what should be in these vials. We did this in triplicate across 8 vials.
It's very consistent, and they are over the EMA and the FDA's, limits. Next slide. The EMA has a ratiometric limit that looks at RNA to DNA ratios, and you can measure you should expect an 11.5 CT offset between the spike in between the vector. What we see is only 5 to to 7 CT difference, which means there's an 18 to 70 fold over the limit of the 3 30 nanogram per milligram recommended by the EMA. Next slide.
You can readily, assay this in any other lab around the world now. If you put these vaccines directly into quantitative PCR, you can get CTs as low as 17. This is very important to know because COVID was diagnosed with CTs less than 40, which is over a 1000000 fold higher contamination being injected than what you might get from a nasal swab. Next slide. We know these vials, were these vials were sent to us anonymously in the mail, so we do not have the cold chain.
However, we can measure the RNA integrity by putting them on electrophoresis systems, and we do not see a substantial difference in the RNA integrity from the files that we received versus what's been published about these in the past. Next slide. Various people on Twitter have now begun to to reproduce this. In addition, I'd point to the EMA's documentation, where they have an 8 15 fold variance across ten lots of double stranded DNA contamination documented in the EMA process. Next slide.
There are some risks to this. There is double stranded DNA can create interferon responses, and Keith Petten at the FDA has done great work demonstrating the risks of DNA integration into the genome if these things are in vaccines. Next slide. The call to action here is all of these primer sequences are now public, and people are downloading them and trying to reproduce this work. You can reproduce this work in 60 minutes with a microliter of the vaccine, which is 1 3 100th of a dose for less than $10.
I encourage everyone to try and do this to understand what we have at foot. I will note we did not measure any of the bad lots that are in the Schmeling et al paper that demonstrated high adverse events in certain lots. To be measuring what seemed to be normal lots. Next slide. And thank you for your time and consideration.
Great. Thank you so much, mister McKernan, for your presentation.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government from 2015. It reveals that the NIH collaborated with Dr. Barrick on the Frankenstein Coronavirus. The agreement states that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed by NIAID and Moderna are jointly owned by the government. It's surprising that the same government now mandating the vaccine actually owns it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'll see how long this one makes it for. Are you ready? This is a 153 pages of the confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government. Mhmm. And it goes back to 2015.
What? Jason, what was happening in 2015? Frankenstein coronavirus. That's right. The same time Doctor.
Barrick and Doctor. Shi published their paper on the new Frankenstein Coronavirus. In fact, let's skip down to page 104. It shows that the NIH and Moderna we're collaborating with doctor Barrick. Wow.
His signature is on page 106 of the material transfer agreement. But let's get back up to the top of this specific agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring the RNA tech to doctor Barrick. But look what they want to make clear. Quote, mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna.
I'm sorry. I mean, I've seen ulterior motives before, but usually you see them coming. Did you know that the government co owns the vaccine? Oh, by the way, this is not part of the Trump's See, this is this is not part of that. This is 2015.
The same government that is now mandating its use owns the vaccine. Mhmm. You better share that one quick.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
This... https://t.co/MOWhF8NQbO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Smartwatches, although within government safety levels for radiation, can weaken muscles, including the heart and brain. Magnets placed on top of the hand strengthen the body, while magnets below the hand or on the palm weaken it. Holding phones in the palm exposes the body to magnetic fields, further weakening it. Inverting normal behaviors can lead to societal control. Some individuals have reported numbness in their arms from wearing Fitbits. Instead of smartwatches, consider wearing copper, brass, silver, crystals, or stones for piezoelectric healing properties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Radiation from a digital watch is within government safety levels, but grossly weakens the muscles. Smartwatches, You know how they always tell you about the smartwatches and you can track your steps? Well, if it weakens the body, then it's also gonna weaken the heart and gonna weaken the brain. And also magnets. This is an interesting one.
Check this. If you put magnets on top of a hand, the hand or the body becomes stronger. Okay? If we put magnets below the hand or on the palm, the hand and the body becomes weaker. How do we hold our phones?
You hold them in your palm. You don't hold them like this. You hold them in your palm. So if there's magnetic that magnetics that are taking place in your hands, the body will become weaker. As somebody just said, a weak society is an easily controllable society.
Yes. If you are inverting every single thing in which a human or a person or an animal or something is supposed to be doing and flipping it, then all of a sudden they're going to start to have issues. Somebody wrote down here, I wore a Fitbit for years and it made my arm go numb. So thankfully, I am aware enough to realize that's what it was. Yes.
Any of those smartwatches and anything, just just wear some copper or just wear some brass or wear some silver or wear a piece of, a crystal or a stone. Those are piezoelectric healing proper
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the judiciary committee hearing, we faced some challenges. We aimed to obtain subpoenas for Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs and Sotomayor's book deal, which were not previously reported. Unfortunately, the chairman blocked our requests, which goes against the committee's intended process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, if you were not watching C SPAN and if you didn't see that judiciary committee hearing today, this was quite a mess. But we were trying to get my subpoenas of Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs and the subpoena of Sotomayor in her book deal, things that weren't reported, but we have found out about this through the news. And, of course, the chairman blocked it all, cut it off. That's not how this committee is supposed to work.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
The effects of small particles and aluminum on human health if released into the stratosphere are being studied by collaborators from Carnegie Mellon. Initial calculations show no human health impact from 10 megatons of material. Research on the toxicological effects of aluminum is ongoing and has not been published yet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question is, what would be the effects of these materials on human health if they came down into the stratosphere? In particular, small particles and aluminum? So the collaborators of mine working on the aerosol scheme are actually folks from Carnegie Mellon who focused on human health impacts. And while we haven't published it, that was the very first thing we did was do the order of magnitude calculation in pencil and paper, but with an expert on human health impacts impacts about whether that could be an issue. And for aluminum or other particles, there are a lot of toxicological things that need to get looked at seriously.
But if you're just thinking about the sheer number of particles and the human health impact of small particles, the answer is, well, we haven't published yet. That was the first thing we looked at with some of the leading experts who do epidemiological research on human health impacts, and it's not even close to being initiated. Can you clarify, so 10 megatons of Kahuna dumped into the atmosphere, we have no human health impact. So let me be more careful here. We're to separate out the talks of logical so the Illumina, we've only begun to research and publish nothing.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
This 👇😳 https://t.co/JVxCt33eau
Video Transcript AI Summary
We reviewed over 2,000 pages of financial records revealing a complex network of shell companies involving Joe Biden and his family members. Evidence suggests human trafficking and financial corruption, with money flowing from various foreign countries. The investigation will uncover how the Biden family profited from Joe Biden's political influence. This information needs to be shared with the American people for transparency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We just, finished reviewing the financial records in the Treasury. What I saw was over 2,000 pages of jaw dropping information. There's basically an enterprise wrapped around Joe Biden, involving not only multiple family members more than we thought there were, but other people as well. Just a complete conglomerate of LLC shell companies where money was passing through from foreign countries, China, Ukraine, but many more countries than just those. There's a lot of information the American people deserve to know of the Biden family and the crimes they've been involved in.
And the oversight committee has a much bigger investigation to do than we ever thought was possible. I just saw evidence of human trafficking. This involved prostitutes, not only from here in the United States, but foreign countries like Russia and Ukraine. This is this is unbelievable that a president and a former vice president, not only his son, Hunter Biden, but many more family members extending past Hunter Biden and his immediate family. We're going to have to really get to work.
This is an investigation that needs to be revealed to the American people. And not only do we have questions about Hunter Biden himself, but this is going to extend into developing a web of, corruption, a web of fake companies, that's going to reveal money that came in from many foreign countries and went directly into the personal bank accounts of the Biden family, where they have financially benefited directly from Joe Biden's, seats of power. And we look forward to investigating, exposing for this this for the American people, and, and we'll see where it goes from there.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Motion picture stars are referred to as movie stars because in the Bible, stars were called lesser illuminaries. These lesser illuminaries are linked to the big Illuminati using them. Various communist leaders have been seen holding a red rose, symbolizing socialism and communism, hinting at a secret society behind them. The use of symbols like the red rose is significant, as seen in historical figures like Hitler using red and black colors. Pictures of leaders with red roses show a deeper connection to secret societies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's why motion picture stars are called movie stars because in the bible stars were referred to as lesser illuminaries. So these lesser illuminaries are working for the big Illuminati. The big Illuminati are using the lesser Illuminati. The lesser illuminaries are just stars.
Speaker 1: And we we have pictures with the president, with his hand stretched out holding a rose.
Speaker 0: A red rose. But I have about 15 major color pictures of communist leaders throughout the world, holding a red rose in their hand, and these are from newspapers and magazines. I began to pick up on this because someone alerted me to it That the symbol of the red rose in implies not only socialism and communism, but a secret society operating behind socialism and communism that
Speaker 1: uses a red rose. This way out Willie holding the rose, we find Khrushchev, We find, all the congress All the congress leaders. And then we find the president of the United States over in his early years, leading anti American demonstrations in the Soviet Union.
Speaker 0: Well, I know. But I'm saying that it's it's not enough to say these things. You really must show the pictures so that people will see that what we're talking about here are symbols and emblems. Well, even Hitler used red and black, didn't he? So he's And he's
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Human population growth is a major issue that impacts many other problems. If the population was the same as it was 500 years ago, many of these issues wouldn't exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
@AwakenTFallen - 🐦⬛Awaken the fallen🐦⬛
👇🤔👇🐦⬛ https://t.co/CSZBV7bddi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transmission system outside Tromsor is part of the ACAD system, spanning Svalbard, Tromsø, Kiruna, and Sorakulla. It emits electromagnetic fields across Europe, potentially for mind control like harp. People are unaware of this manipulation, which can alter thoughts, feelings, and relationships remotely, turning individuals into biological robots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transmission system that you're going to know? That's right. It's in outside of Tromsor, the biggest type of thing, part of ACAD system. This system going from Svalbard, Tromsø, Kiruna in Sweden has the headquarters of the whole system and then in Lapland, in Finnish Lapland, in Sorakulla. And when they blast electromagnetic fields, it goes through all of Europe.
And do you think that's a form of mind control? Oh, it can be used for mind control. Of course, like harp. And that is the danger because people know nothing about mind control. They don't know that your thoughts can be changed, your attitudes, your feelings.
If you love somebody, somebody sitting at a computer, even through satellites, can say, Okay. Let's make it opposite. And you start just detesting the person who you love. You can't be in the same room, you know, you feel uncomfortable. I think this is terrible because you're making people into biological robots.
@TrumpDailyPosts - Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a call to action against choosing Kamala Harris, with a strong endorsement for President Trump. The speaker warns of dangers posed by the left, emphasizing Trump's commitment to saving America. They criticize the left's stance on issues like border security and gender identity. The speaker urges people to vote for Trump and references religious texts for guidance. They express hope for a united America under God's protection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My friends, this is the war of our lifetime now. We, the people, are in trouble if this nation picks Kamala Harris. We must stop this crime that is happening. It's a war crime that Obama is directing, and Kamala Harris will this horror. You, my friends, will have the biggest horror that you will not know how to end.
We must all see this truth. Become one with this understanding that God will guide us with words of wisdom that we may understand that Donald Trump will make any sacrifice to save America. We, the people, are in danger, And we must vote for President Trump because he will save this nation. And the left are all afraid of his strength because he is only for the people. He's not for the power, for the greed, the lies, or wanting to destroy one's hard earned earnings.
We must stop this madness now. Our children are in danger. The left is trying to take away your children and turn them into non binaries. You all on the left, the ones who are my peers that preach, you all know who you are. What have you all learned in this life?
Have you learned the lessons that will bring you to the higher place of eternity? This is now all your lessons. For each one who votes against Trump, this will be among the worst crimes that you will see in your lives. And you know why? This nation has criminals killing your child, father, brother, friend, you because of the left mentality allowing this border to be open.
The ones who are on the left to fight against Trump will pay a price for the injustice of lies that are Kamala Harris and Obama. And all of you who think this is the greatest economy, you will find that your life will sink into a hole of darkness. And the freedom we all once had will be burned in the dark plague of the darkest time in history like the destruction of the Civil War. My fellow Americans, we've come too far. And this life we were given was the blessing of God, and this is our hope.
To remember that he shall chant the words of Psalm 25 and in the Torah, Isaiah 55. We shall overcome. May God watch over us us and bring this nation back together so her beauty will shine with her glory. The red, white, and blue. God bless America.
And he will protect our nation against this evil left. And Donald Trump will make America great again. Much love to him. Much love.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
There should have been a revolution over the ongoing issues of rape, prostitution, torture, and murder affecting our daughters. It's not just the actions of certain groups but also the cover-ups by authorities who allowed this to happen. We are treated as cattle, and when we fear them, it becomes tyranny. We need to unite and organize as a majority, as Muslims represent only 7% of the UK population. We've had enough of mass immigration and wars that we never consented to. Key decisions impacting our lives are being made without our input, which is not democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Already should have been a revolution in this country over the rape and prostitution, torture, and murder of our daughters in every town to see. Not just the fact that the Islamic gangs done. The fact that they knew about it. If they covered it up. The police forces knew about it.
Covered it up. They all let it happen. And that they say it out loud. They let a generation of our daughters be kidnapped and raped, and they did not care. We are seen by them as cattle.
Yeah. We and they do not fear us. And when we fear them, that's tyranny. When they fear us, that's democracy. Yeah.
And we need to I said, we've sat back. Back. We need to get organized. We need to unite this nation. All we're hearing about is the Muslim vote.
The Muslim vote. Well, the Muslims make up 7% of the UK. Yeah? We are a majority. We have had enough of mass immigration.
No one's asked us did we want a 1000000 people reported last year. No one asked us if we want to continually go into war. No one asked us. That's not democracy. No one's asking us the key decisions.
Yeah? The key decisions that are affecting us all.
@Ragnar71115 - Archangel Michael
Video Transcript AI Summary
In today's education, history is increasingly neglected, leading to a population that lacks national pride and awareness. Modern philosophy is criticized for promoting misguided ideas. The speaker argues against the acceptance of abortion, euthanasia, and same-sex marriage, claiming these issues stem from ignoring divine laws. They assert that the white race is being replaced and express a bleak outlook for the future. The speaker disputes the Holocaust narrative, claiming it is a fabrication and questioning the logistics of cremating six million bodies. They believe that emotional narratives overshadow evidence and lament that society prefers to live in a world of lies, failing to address the root causes of societal issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's interesting that in today's schools, the children are taught less and less history. The the one world government and the new world orders do not want people to know history. They want people to be dumb, stupid, sheep that could be led where they like with no pride in their country, no love of their country.
Speaker 1: Modern philosophy teaches nonsense, and it's very grave. And that's why this the students are faggots. And then for when some sweet, soft, mushy minded liberal says to you, oh, but the existence of God is a question of faith. No. It is not.
God's true church said the book artificialism of birth control is a very bad idea, and it's against the law of God. And if people had listened, we wouldn't have since abortion, euthanasia, same sex marriage, and all of these horrors one after another. And we'd have, a bigger number of white babies. Then there are no more white babies. The white race is being diluted and overrun, and the future looks very dark.
Oh, that's grace. You're being replaced. Germany invaded Russia in order to head off communism as enemies of communism. Nazis were enemies of communism. Communism killed 100 of millions.
Hitler allegedly killed 6,000,000 Jews. It's untrue. It's just not true. It's a fabrication. That so called holocaust is quite simply fabrication.
You can spend a couple of hours on the Internet and if you seek out the revisionist, the best revisionist, is you'll see all the evidence points one way and all of the emotion points in the other way. The the emotion fully backs. 6,000,000 Jews wickedly killed in gas chambers by the Nazis. All the emotions on one side. All the evidence is on the other.
How on earth in a couple of years do you cremate 6,000,000 corpses? It's not possible. With the number of gas evidence that they had at the most in in at Auschwitz or anywhere. The evidence is just absolutely against every time. But minds no longer run on evidence.
People's minds today are gone. If you got a half a brain in your head, you'll see in a short space of time that the holocaust is quite simply a fabrication. 6,000,000 gas. There wasn't one, death deadly gas chamber or there wasn't one gas chamber in in in Nazi Germany, which was killing human beings. Not one.
Yes. The lies have taken over. It's a world of lies that we're living in. And it's a world of lies that people the massive people want to live. People don't like the bad fruits, but they do like the bad roots.
So if they cut off the bad fruits, bad fruits, but don't dig up the bad roots, then the bad fruits will simply grow.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're winning the support of the American people, despite opposition from some in Washington. My Democratic colleagues prioritize bureaucracy and excessive spending over the taxpayer, illegal immigration over the rule of law, teachers unions over students, criminals over victims, transgender athletes over women's sports, and Hamas over Israel. They may feel victorious within their own circles, but they're wrong. The tide is turning; the American people are behind us, and justice will prevail. We're fighting for the right things.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm unapologetically with Trump and Musk. And now among among the, the blue hairs and the opinion writers in Washington, we're losing. We're winning with the American people. And I think, Bill, it's and, Danny, it's the big picture should not go unnoticed. Some people, mostly my Democratic colleagues, have chosen to support the bureaucracy and the spending porn over the American taxpayer.
These are the same folks who chose to support illegal immigration over the rule of law, who chose to support teachers unions over over schools and kids, who chose to support criminals over crime victims, who chose to support transgender athletes over women's sports, frankly, who chose to support Hamas over Israel. Now, they think they're winning and they may be in the bubble washing, but not among the taxpayers. When they say, tell me what we think we're winning, I tell them sure and be on the lookout for flying pigs. I think the justice stick is coming and I think the American people support everything we're doing.
@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's an exciting time with President Trump focused on fulfilling his promises. We need a Justice Department that applies the law equally, unlike the political approach under Biden and Garland. The focus should be on traditional crime, not spying on Americans. We're seeing changes with Pam Bondi and others, targeting sanctuary cities that defy federal law.
We've curbed big tech censorship, but foreign countries are now pressuring tech companies to censor Americans. We're considering visa restrictions for those involved. Investigations are needed into the sweetheart deal for Hunter Biden, the January 6th pipe bombs, and more. The goal is transparency and accountability, answering the questions the American people deserve to have answered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister chairman, just exciting moment. We're brimming. We're brimming with excitement. It's it's it's, really it it it's really, an unbelievable timeline that we're living in.
Speaker 1: You've
Speaker 0: been on the show for years, mister chairman. It's, like, saying that this might be what happens if we get Trump elected. You've you've gotta be whistling Dixie this morning.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah. It is it is an exciting time, and you we've never seen a president with this kind of focus intensity, just this kind of effort to just do what he told the voters he was gonna do, whether it's Elon Musk working for the president on this Doge effort and and identifying all the ridiculous spending or or the things you're talking about. But but this is a great great idea. How about these the the leaders of these cities? Instead of being sanctuary cities, you actually have a mayor who's going to stop the crazy crime that takes place in all our major urban areas.
He's gonna focus on on on on helping the citizens with their better education system and everything else. How about people like that? I think that's what president Trump wants versus, oh, we're gonna be a sanctuary city. We're gonna not comply with federal law enforcement who are executing the law. We're gonna make an we're gonna be a, you know, try to stop them and prevent them from doing their job.
I think I think that's the kind of focus that people want. And frankly, people in those cities want and president Trump is trying to trying to help make that come about.
Speaker 0: Yes. So okay. Something that we haven't gotten to on the show just yet is the news that president Trump has fired now all Joe Biden federal prosecutors. These are some of the people who've been a major thorn in your paw leading the judiciary committee. Your take on this, I'd see it's gotta be welcome, but we well, I don't think we've ever seen action like this, before, certainly not in Trump's first term.
Speaker 1: Well, this is this is real basic. We want a justice department that actually gets back to the fundamental principle, equal treatment under the law. We don't want a justice department like we had under the Biden Garland, administration where they're political. And we know Jack Smith was totally political. We know what was going on with some of the political prosecutions of folks on on January who who were here on January 6, who may have inadvertently stepped across some line and then they get prosecute.
So we we know that kind of attitude out there. And what I think president Trump and the people of the justice department are doing is saying, no. We're gonna focus on equal treatment under the law, applying the law the way it's supposed to be applied, not politics, and that is welcome. And, frankly, that's what the American people voted for because they saw how political that place had become, and and the lawfare activity against the guy who was our nominee for president, who got 77,000,000 votes and is now president of The United States against president Trump. And so, I think it's welcomed by the, by the people and a good thing for following our constitution.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, Bambandi, very much like a wrecking ball. Did you hear the reports that she tore down a portrait of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris?
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 0: And what was it? Merrick Garland. Right? Yeah. That she personally did.
That there's now multiple credible reports that she did it herself and stacked them in the trash.
Speaker 1: The, the, the other thing you said, the the first day on the job, she issues the memorandum. On the second page of that memorandum, she's talking about this committee to look at the weaponization of government and particularly the justice department. And she goes bullet point by bullet point, and it's all things we had been focused on and investigating over the last congress. And it was so refreshing. In fact, I told Pam that.
I said, this is so good that memorandum you put out and the intensity and focus you are bringing to equal treatment under the law, again, is exactly what the American people wanted.
Speaker 0: So the criticism of this is gonna be, oh, you can't take away all the prosecutors. What will happen? Who will prosecute the crime? They've been doing the same thing with the FBI, right, with the, sort of the elimination of those individuals who, as you mentioned, January 6, were going after innocent Americans. You like, what's the counterbalance to that?
Right? Because that's that's the
Speaker 1: that's the that's the problem
Speaker 0: right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They have they take the FBI for an example, Vinny. The about $12,000,000,000 budget at the FBI. More than half of that money is spent on counterintelligence, intelligence, surveillance. I mean, basically, you know, looking and surveilling the American people.
More than half of the budget, half the personnel. I think the American people would kinda like an FBI that's probably focused more on traditional crime that, you know, organized crime, gang activity, money laundering, all the stuff that we typically think the FBI's child exploitation, everything else, focus on stopping that stuff versus spying on the American people. So, that's, I think, the kind of focus you're gonna see from Kash Patel when he gets confirmed and heads the FBI. That's what we want, and that's what I think American people want. So that that's that's what that's the change that I think needs to take place and is going to take place under Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche who will be deputy attorney general, and, of course, Kash Patel at the FBI.
Speaker 0: We oh, I think that the the the changes the changes, shook quite a few people. We weren't expecting that Leticia James gets, sued by the justice department on, like, day three. We weren't expecting that. And, it's, like, refreshing actually because sanctuary states are illegal. I mean, they should be illegal.
Right? Like, you you don't have a right to just defy federal law. You can just do that. You just Yep. Choose.
You're not gonna, there's no first amendment here. Right? And it's like, we're Oregon. Like, that's not how it works, actually.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and this and the situation that I think both Tom Homan and Pam Bondi have talked about where it looks like sometimes their people are tipping off, the the bad gas, the the people with a criminal background who Tom Homan is coming in to rightfully repatriate out of the country repatriate back to their their their their home country, and they're getting tipped off in it. And I think Tom Homan said, it looks like it may have been an FBI agent who did that. Well, you can't do that. That's that that's like helping the bad guys when and and and endangering law enforcement, members potentially.
So, yeah, that when you when you're doing those kind of things, I think criminal prosecution should be something that's definitely, definitely in in play.
Speaker 0: And we wanna be treason, like, you're acting against federal law enforcement and you're helping out the criminals. You're not
Speaker 1: supposed to you're not supposed to help the bad guys. And if you do, you're probably in trouble, and we should probably prosecute peoples who do those things.
Speaker 0: Alright. Let's talk about your let's talk about your potential prosecutions. Let's talk about your potential investigations. What do we have coming up on the judiciary committee? A target rich environment, I think we'd call it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, one thing on the censorship front, we think we've met we've had a huge impact there in stopping, big government and big tech and other federal government agencies and universities all working together, what Michael Shellenberger called the censorship industrial complex. We think we've really scaled that back into protecting the first amendment. But right now what's happening is in foreign countries, they're using their laws to pressure tech companies to censor Americans. And so we're gonna see if there's a way we can put some pressure on these foreign countries to, one example would be if you're you're involved in in in any way, censoring Americans, you shouldn't be able to get a visa and come to the country.
If you're someone of these foreign dignitaries who likes to come to The United States, everyone likes to come here. So that's a that's a piece of legislation one of our members has that we'll look at passing. And then on the oversight thing, we still think there's a look back that needs to happen with David Weiss, who was gonna give the sweetheart deal to Hunter Biden. We still think we don't have answers on, you know, who planted the pipe bombs on January 6, who leaked the Dobbs opinion, who put cocaine at the White House for goodness sake. I think the American people like to know those things, and they'd also like to know about what the Garland justice department was doing when they said, if you're a pro life Catholic, you're an extremist, or if you're a mom and dad at a school board meeting, we're gonna investigate you.
So we're gonna look back at all that stuff and get answers for the American people.
Speaker 0: I'd love to get an answer on something that cross our timeline. Some of your colleagues, Tom Tillis in the senate was actually, in front of an ad. I couldn't believe it when I saw it. He was in front of an ad that had an x over Elon Musk, and he said we must eliminate Elon Musk. We'll pull up the ad here and we'll pop it up on screen because it was I thought there's no way.
Here it is.
Speaker 1: There's no way.
Speaker 0: It's like it's gotta be a meme. Right? But no. It's real. And here's, your colleague, Republican in the senate saying, this is allegedly we're looking into who's funding this, but, like, help eliminate Elon Musk with a crossover his face and a USAID logo on the bottom.
And this is being of course, you can't just advertise somebody has to approve these advertisements.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Who's approving these advertisements exactly? It looks like an open threat against a member of the administration. This is insane.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Again, Democrats, Democrats will will attack the guy who's exposing the stupid spending instead of trying to stop the stupid spending. It makes no sense to me. And they're they're over the last, what, two weeks, it's been one one theme, one message from the Democrats, go after Elon Musk. Even though the president told us as as we've said before, told us that when he when he was running for the job, I'm gonna have Elon Musk head up this this Doge, group who's gonna go through agency by agency in the federal government, identify stupid things we're spending taxpayer money on.
And when he identifies those things, the Democrats says, oh, we gotta get rid of Elon Musk. What? That makes no sense. It's I I think, again, we're the party of common sense as the president, always says. I think the American people see this as good common sense governance and are not gonna be supportive of the left who continues to attack, Elon Musk.
I think he's doing the Lord's work. I know he did when he bought remember when he said when he bought Twitter? He said, like, I didn't spend $44,000,000,000 to buy Twitter. I spent $44,000,000,000 to save the first amendment and free speech for goodness sake, and he's been an integral part of the effort to protect the First Amendment. And now he's gonna try to protect us from having these bureaucrats who think they're smarter than you and I and all your viewers and listeners think they're smarter than the rest of us, protect us from the stupid things they wanna spend our money on.
Speaker 0: So it'd be nice it'd be nice to close down the government caves. Didn't know that, didn't know the feds on tricycles in limestone caves was how, retirements were processed. Did did you know that, congressman?
Speaker 1: I did not. I did not know that.
Speaker 0: Is that exciting exciting thing you learned this week?
Speaker 1: I did yeah. I didn't know we were spending money for what some trans comic can perform opera or whatever in Ireland. I didn't know we were spending money to put Bert and Ernie and Big Bert on Baghdad TV. And you're like, what the heck? Heck?
Speaker 0: It's true. What the heck? It's crazy. It's true.
Speaker 1: But oh, no. No. No. It's not that. That's not the problem.
The problem is Elon Musk. That that that that makes no sense. No sense to to the folks I get the privilege of representing in the Fourth District Of Ohio. They're on the Elon Musk's side.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. I mean, it's it just but just as since we named Robert, if you if you would please allow us, here's a photo of the special special tricycles. These are tricycles that the feds drive around. They ride around on them all day.
We pay them salaries and then, massive retirement pensions to ride around on tricycles all day inside of the caverns of an old limestone man to handle retirement paperwork by hand and store them in boxes.
Speaker 1: This
Speaker 0: is what we pay for in the era of AI.
Speaker 1: Go figure. Go figure. Yeah.
Speaker 0: In conclusion, we did hear, from somebody I know that you're very close with, James Comer and Anaplena Luna, this past week. They both been on the program, and then we covered live their announcement of sort of a massive declassification operation. I'm sure you're in favor of that. You've often been on the show talking about it. Can you give us kind of an update?
Is this even something that is feasible? We've you've held up the black line paper before. You've been, like, you've come on the program and held out, like, these just black ink blots. And, like, what what's to give us any hope that that we'll be able to punch past that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think I think the main hope is is in the White House. President Trump has indicated he wants the American people to have transparency and understand what what happened with some of these situation with with with the the tragic assassination of of, JFK, and and other issues. So, yeah, let's let's get the facts out there. Our government has information.
We're gonna work with with, in the in the justice department. We're gonna work with, Pam and, Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and and and Todd Blanch, the deputy attorney general, and Cash, to get information on on things, as I said before, that we want that we think the American people still have questions about. So we wanna get those answers. And, the same with, with chairman Comer and representative, Ana Paulina Luna, they wanna get answers to the American people. So the more folks the more you can focus in on it.
I mean, we're seeing this with Elon Musk. There have been organizations who've highlighted the stupid spending in the past. Citizens against government waste has done good work over, you know, the last forty years highlighting the pork book and all the stupid spending. But when you have an intense focus and it was an element of the campaign and a presidential race, that's when you can really highlight it and you get the media attention and the focus of the American people. That's when you can make a difference.
So any effort that adds to the the attention and and focus on an issue helps us get the answers, and that's what chairman Comer and representative Anna Paulino Luna are up to.
Speaker 0: Don't understand it. I I'd say it probably wants to show. Why does our federal government spend so much time and resources protecting pederists? I don't get it, mister I don't. I said this is Jeffrey Epstein.
He's already been he was found guilty of these things, yet we spend all of these resources protecting the client list and everybody who was involved. That doesn't make any sense to me. I'm just I'm just a dumb Midwesterner, you know. I guess I don't.
Speaker 1: You got common sense. Common sense. That's what you are from the nook ass.
Speaker 0: Too many questions. Yeah. That's right. Everybody needs, obviously, if you're not already following Jim Jordan, you're crazy. Okay?
You're living in one of the limestone caves where the government does its retirement. And you're also by following Jim Jordan, who has more followers than us on x, very humbling, 6,000,000 followers on x, you're missing out on the man who actually saved Facebook from itself, and it's something that we haven't gotten a chance to thank you for live. Thank you. Mark Zuckerberg specifically citing your, investigation into Facebook and censorship, saying this is why we've decided to destroy all of our censorship policies because of Jim Jordan. And so thank you, mister chairman.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Thanks for all the good work you do.
Speaker 0: Alright. Godspeed.
@Michael951413 - Michael
Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats reportedly rejected another push to make purchasing or soliciting sex from a 16 or 17 year old an automatic felony. They also sidelined Democratic Assembly Member Maggie Krell, who has focused on this issue. Krell's original proposal for an automatic felony for older teens was blocked by the public safety committee. Krell noted that state laws are inconsistent for the trafficker and the buyer. One speaker argued that arresting the buyers, who create the demand, is key to stopping human trafficking. The debate is expected to continue until the felony is potentially enacted. There is urgency to address the victimization of 16 and 17 year olds.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Child sex trafficking. Democrats today, again, rejecting another push to make it an automatic felony to purchase or solicit a 16 or 17 year old for sex.
Speaker 1: Not only did Democrats block this latest attempt to ramp up the penalties for the buyers in the child sex trafficking industry, they also sidelined Sacramento's Democratic Assembly Member Maggie Krell, who has made this her life's work. Democratic leaders promise to keep the conversation going, but they're leaving Krell, an expert, out of it. After an hour of closed door planning, Democrats emerged with a deal that stripped Sacramento's Democratic Assembly Member Maggie Krell from her own bill that tries to crack down on the consumers of the child sex trafficking industry. She originally proposed the automatic felony for the older teens this year, noting state laws are inconsistent for the trafficker and the buyer. But that piece blocked by the public safety committee earlier this week.
Speaker 2: You wanna stop human trafficking and little girls being put up and down these streets? If you wanna really stop that, you arrest tricks. You arrest who demands it. You don't arrest who sells it because whoever sells it, they cannot sell it. Are they businessmen?
The person that buys it.
Speaker 0: That's the problem too.
Speaker 1: Back on set. This debate is going to be ongoing until potentially that felony is put in there, but we'll see.
Speaker 3: And we really should point out the urgency with this, that children 16 and 17 years old are being victimized every
Speaker 0: Child sex trafficking.
@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Five billion people on the planet got a vaccine of some sort.
- If you apply the range of the death rate in The US that I gave you earlier, you get a range of globally seven point three million to fifteen million died from the vaccine.
- That Seven million to fifteen million.
- There's been a study by Dennis Rancourt; we've looked at his methodology. It's different than what we do. We're not saying it's wrong. It's it's an estimate.
- And he came up with seventeen million.
- So our upper our upper range is right there with Dennis Rancourt.
- Twenty nine to sixty million disabled globally.
- Injuries, if you take eighteen percent of the vaccinated using the Pfizer, so that again, this could be money, but we get a range of, at the high end, 900,000,000, 500,000,000 at the low end Injured.
- Dollars 500,000,000 to $900,000,000 who had an injury that has not disabled.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Five billion people on the planet got a vaccine of some sort. If you apply the range of the death rate in The US that I gave you earlier, you get a range of globally seven point three million to fifteen million died from the vaccine. That Seven million to fifteen million. Yeah. And so let's let's there's been a study by Dennis Rancourt.
He we've looked at his methodology. It's different than what we do. We're not saying it's wrong. It's it's it's it's an estimate. And he came up with seventeen million, which I think you talked about.
So our upper our upper range is right there with Dennis Rancourt. Okay? Disabilities, when you look at the ratio of four to one, you multiply the seven million and the 15 possibly 15,000,000 times four, you did a range of 29 to let me see. I gotta look at the numbers. Twenty nine to sixty million disabled globally.
Okay? Twenty nine to sixty million disabled globally. Correct. And then injuries, if you take eighteen percent of the vaccinated using the Pfizer, so that again, this could be money, but we get a range of, at the high end, 900,000,000, 500,000,000 at the low end Injured. Dollars 500,000,000 to $900,000,000 who had an injury that has not disabled.
Yes.
@JakeG_Official - JAKEGTV
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Speaker 0 asserts that the CDC is led by individuals with dual citizenship with Israel and that they are Jewish, naming multiple specific people: Rochelle Walensky (CDC director), Anshaw Alcic (deputy director), Sherry Berger (CDC chief of staff), Mitchell Wolf (CDC chief medical officer), and the CDC director of the Washington office (Jeff Rezik). He also claims a “COVID czar” Jeff Zainz and a “COVID senior advisor,” Andy Slabbitt, have dual Israeli citizenship and are Jewish, as well as the assistant of health secretary for human services, Rachel Levine, described as transgender with dual Israeli citizenship.
- He lists additional figures connected to COVID policy: head of Pfizer vaccine, Albert Garla; Pfizer chief scientist Michael Dosten; Moderna chief scientist Talzak; BlackRock CEO Larry Fink; BlackRock president Rob Capitao; the CDC chief medical officer of Johnson & Johnson joined Wall Stryker; Merck’s Michael Rosenbald; and the head adviser of the World Economic Forum, Yuval Harari. He states all of these individuals have dual citizenship with Israel and are Jewish.
- Speaker 1 interrupts, calling the remarks “Freedom of speech” and later tells Speaker 0 to stop, stating the chair has ruled the comments out of order; Speaker 0 questions why calling someone Jewish would be out of order, insisting the term “Jew” is not derogatory and continues listing names.
- Speaker 0 concludes by saying the list is only about COVID and acknowledges other domains like media and banks, then thanks the audience for their patience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who is in charge of the CDC that was controlling and telling our government to shut down small businesses and what they recommend for the mandates of the vaccines and Pfizer and all this? The director of the CDC was Rochelle Walensky, dual citizenship with Israel. She's a Jew. Deputy director of the CDC, Anshaw Alcic, dual citizenship with Israel. Jew.
CDC chief of staff, Sherry Berger, dual citizenship with Israel. Jew. CDC chief medical officer Mitchell Wolf, dual citizenship with Israel. Jew, CDC director of the Washington office. I'm gonna ask for pertinent to the topic.
Speaker 1: Freedom of speech.
Speaker 0: Let's see. This is this is pertinent to COVID. So director of the CDC of the Washington office, Jeff Rezik, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. COVID czar, Jeff Zainz, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. COVID senior advisor, Andy Slabbitt, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew, assistant of health secretary for
Speaker 1: human services
Speaker 0: for our country, the assistant of health secretary, Rachel Levine, transgender dual citizenship with Israel. Can
Speaker 1: I ask that you hold off Christopher? The chair has ruled that your comments are out of order. She's asked you to stop. How is it out of order? The chair has He said Jew.
There's nothing wrong with Jew. It's not derogatory.
Speaker 0: Head of Pfizer vaccine, Albert Garla, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. Pfizer chief scientist Michael Dosten, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. Moderna chief scientist Talzak, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. Blackrock, everyone know Blackrock? Blackrock CEO, Larry Fink, dual citizenship with Israel I said we're willing to sacrifice our ego, our reputation
Speaker 1: You have names
Speaker 0: in lives. Yes, ma'am. And I love you, and I appreciate your patience. Black Rock president Rob Capitao, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. The CDC chief medical officer of Johnson and Johnson joined Wall Stryker, dual citizenship with Israel Jew.
Chief medical officer
Speaker 1: You are done.
Speaker 0: Merck, Michael Rosenbald, dual citizenship with Israel Jew, the head adviser of the World Economic Forum, Yuval Harari, dual citizenship with Israel Jew, and that's only talking about COVID. That's not talking about who's in charge of
Speaker 1: Christopher, you need to stop.
Speaker 0: Who's in control of of the media or the banks. I can go on. God bless y'all. Thank you for your patience.
@Southern75_29 - Autumn
Video Transcript AI Summary
- In March 2026, the EPA issued an emergency waiver allowing E15 gasoline (15% corn ethanol) to be sold nationwide year-round; Congress is attempting to make that permanent.
- E15 is illegal to put in cars built before 2001 because ethanol is a powerful solvent that eats rubber fuel lines, corrodes steel gas tanks from the inside, and attacks water, causing engine choking.
- Mechanics note that the alcohol scrubs years of varnish off the tank, clogs filters, and causes vapor lock.
- Automakers warn that using E15 could cost drivers up to $4,000 in per-vehicle repairs.
- The corn ethanol lobby allegedly spent $187,000,000 buying influence in Washington and has received over $20,000,000,000 in taxpayer subsidies to promote ethanol, which the speaker claims waters down gasoline and increases production costs.
- The speaker asserts this is a pipeline and mandate fuel that slowly destroys older independent vehicles, making repairs expensive and forcing consumers to buy new cars, which allegedly come with AI mandatory kill switches.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you saw my last video about that mandate about the government kill switching our cars and stuff, right, in 2027, you probably asked yourself first. You're like, fine. I'll just go and buy an old car. And I've seen the comments. I've seen it all.
And trust me, I thought the same thing. I was like, yeah, bro. Like, no. Well, here's how here's how they've already planned for that one. Ready?
In March 2026, the EPA issued an emergency waiver allowing an e allowing e 15 gasoline. That's 15% corn ethanol to be sold nationwide year round. Congress is currently trying to make that permanent. So it sounds like a move to lower gas prices, but here's what they're not telling you at the pump. E 15 is literally illegal to put in your car before built in 2001.
Why? Well, because ethanol is a powerful solvent. It eats the rubber fuel lines. It corrodes steel gas tanks from the inside out, and it attacks water causing your engine to choke. Mechanism stops are documenting excuse me.
Mechanics one more time. Mechanic shops are documenting this right now. The alcohol scrubs years of varnish off of your tank, clogs your filters, and causes vapor lock. Automakers themselves warn that that this could have cost drivers up to $4,000 in per vehicle repair. Who benefits from this?
The corn ethanol lobby spent a $187,000,000 buying influence in Washington. In return, they've received over $20,000,000,000 in taxpayer subsidies to water down your fucking gas with a product that takes our takes one gallon of fossil fuel just to produce one gallon of fucking ethanol. It's a pipeline, the mandate fuel that slowly destroys your older independent vehicles, the repairs become too expensive. You're forced to buy a new car, and newer cars comes with your fucking AI mandatory kill switches. Stop looking at the smoke, and then look at the fucking policies, people.
Share this.