reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@0ccultbot - occultbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are secret facilities and capabilities that most people can't even imagine. One well-known black budget time travel project, called Looking Glass, is said to still be classified. The technology allowed operators to look backward and forward in time using their consciousness. The operator would sit in a chair from an extraterrestrial craft that could interface with consciousness. The data collected was projected onto video monitors at high speeds. The operator's biases affected the images seen. The human mind is uniquely equipped to navigate through time, accessing memories of the past and imagining alternative events. The Yellow Cube, similar to Looking Glass, was used by leaders to see their optimal future. The Looking Glass device was provided to humans in ancient Sumerian times. Future humans from 45,000 years ahead provided assistance after a cataclysm. The Earth was destroyed in 2012 due to the overload of looking glass devices. The device has been dismantled after discovering two probable timelines. The positive timeline is likely to come to fruition. This information, though classified, is hard to dismiss as unreal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The level of secrecy and secret facilities and the capabilities of our nationally kept secrets, would shatter most people's imagination of what is possible.
Speaker 1: This is probably one of the more well known black budget time travel projects With the exception of the Montauk project, many whistleblowers have said that the program was not actually shut down, but just classified
Speaker 0: into deep people that know everything about Looking Glass, that have gotten all the reports and all the information, the elites of the world probably figured out that that was the end of the game. I mean, nothing could be manipulated beyond that point.
Speaker 1: According to the alleged insiders, the looking glass technology was apparently used to look backward and forward in time. Using the consciousness of an operator is a type of steering mechanism. The operator would sit in a chair that was apparently recovered from a downed extraterrestrial craft capable of interfacing with consciousness directly. When the device was turned on, strong toroidal fields of energy cycled about a pouch of water at the center, Which acted as a sort of resonator for in streaming energies from the point of focus maintained by the operator. The data was collected and projected onto video monitors at incredible speeds, which later needed to be deinterlaced to reveal discernible images.
What's interesting is that the biases of the operator would have a direct effect on the images collected. For example, If one were to look back to the time of Jesus' crucifixion, if the person doing so is an atheist, they may not see anything at all. But if the person was a Christian, They may see the infamous crucifixion event. This is suggestive of a time space mechanic in the universe, wherein the human mind is able to navigate through time itself. The work of Dewey b Larson and his reciprocal systems theory provides the basis for this interpretation.
Briefly, as described by Larson, the universe is broken up into 2 physical regions as defined by motion. Below the speed of light, Motion operates in 3 dimensions of space and 1 dimension of time. Above the speed of light, motion operates in 1 dimension of space and 3 dimensions of time. As bizarre as that sounds, the mind is uniquely equipped to navigate in time, which is able to access memories of the past, an awareness of events in the present, conceive of future possibilities, and even imagine alternative events that did not actually happen. In other words, the human mind can select the point of focus just like in remote viewing and receive the information from the store of memories made during the experience.
Speaker 2: Do you know the difference between Looking Glass and the Yellow Cube? Yes. Okay. Are you aware of what happened to the Yellow And how it was used, and so on.
Speaker 0: Are you? I believe that the Yellow Cube still exists. I can't say for certain if it's on this planet, but I would say that it's definitely protected from use at this point.
Speaker 2: Okay. Well, that coincides with the testimony we got.
Speaker 0: The yellow cube or the yellow book would give you your possible future.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 0: So it took basically the choices that you would inherently make along a timeline and tell you what that timeline would be given that you made all the choices that your brain would make?
Speaker 2: Well, this is exactly what I was just going to ask you. What we were told is that leaders of governments And so on, people in Hyatt, places, you know, politically, would use this to try to see their most optimum future and then follow those, So they were using it to enhance their wealth, etcetera, etcetera, in a very egotistical way, and that was part of the problem with it.
Speaker 1: The Looking Glass device seems to be capable of the same type of process. To access a data stream from any conceivable location in space or time, Steered via the consciousness of an operator. According to the testimony of Burish, the technology was provided to the human race during the Sumerian times When an advanced contingent of future humans went back in time and provided that civilization assistance after a cataclysm known as the Deluge, The Sumerian cylinder seals were encoded with plans to build the Looking Glass device. Earlier versions of the project saw the development of an actual portal that an individual could move through to jump in time. According to Burisch, accounts provided by captured beings known in the program as p 40 fives.
Earth. Future humans 45000 years into the future, the Earth was destroyed by massive cataclysms around the year 2012. This is apparently because looking glass devices were actively being used during a major celestial alignment, which overloaded the organic energy grid of the planet. Urush further claims that the device has been dismantled as a result of discovering 2 probable time lines. One of which Is the cataclysm described by the captured being.
An attempt was made to look into the future, but no concrete data was able to be received past infamous date of December 21, 2012, suggesting that this date is a nexus point in time, whereby either timeline 1 Or timeline 2 would gain momentum. In the last report, the bureau suggested that timeline 1, the positive timeline had an over 80% likelihood of coming to fruition. Given that we are nearly a decade beyond the 2012 date and no major cataclysms have occurred, We are most likely well entrenched within the positive time line. This is undoubtedly one of the more intriguing topics in awakening times, Which seems to be well hidden in popular works of fiction. Corey Goode, a secret space program insider, claims to have reviewed documentation relating to this project.
Speaker 0: It would be very hard to accept that all of this information that is currently held secret and classified is actually real.
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the censorship of Alex Jones and the demonization of conspiracy theorists. It questions why questioning the shape of the Earth is deemed harmful and highlights the creation of the term "conspiracy theorist" by the CIA. The speakers mention the banning of flat Earth content on YouTube and the introduction of factual information boxes by Google. They express disbelief and curiosity about the reasons behind the censorship. Overall, the video explores the suppression of alternative viewpoints and the perceived fakeness of space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Alex Jones is just a crackpot, why are the most powerful people in the
Speaker 1: country trying to silence him? No one bothers a censor, the flat earthers. Maybe Alex Jones is onto something. Read this book and decide for yourself who's crazy.
Speaker 2: And not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 3: In the age social media censorship questioning whether or not the earth is a globe has been deemed harmful thought. But why is this?
Speaker 4: The term conspiracy theorist was created after the JFK assassination to demonize people looking into the official story. That's a fact. That's where it came really Yo. Yeah. For the CIA, they created that term.
Speaker 5: Oh, the story that's so classified.
Speaker 4: The idea
Speaker 5: documents we can't see. We can't worry. We're never gonna see. Years later. Okay.
Speaker 4: Okay. We're never gonna see. So that term been demonized. And the people on the left, they call, oh, it's a conspiracy. I mean, I grew
Speaker 5: up in a world where I actually believe that See, theories were the way that dumb, uninformed people explain the complex world. That was a mark of a low IQ. Now the more informed, the smarter the person, the more likely they are to be connecting the dots that you're It's
Speaker 6: funny that, you know, those flatter videos, you know, that gets, demonized so much, but, it's kind of a compelling Earth. Space is kind of fake. So fake.
Speaker 4: It's so fake. I mean, it's
Speaker 6: just it's Islamophobia born a 1000% right.
Speaker 1: No one bothers to censor the flat earthers.
Speaker 5: Well, flat earthers get banned on YouTube. No one
Speaker 1: bothers a censor, the flat earthers.
Speaker 7: So we're introducing boxes that provide factual information at the top of results that have shown themselves to turn up a lot of information that is counterfactual such as searching for the earth is flat on YouTube where you see a lot of
Speaker 4: Your response is to put a box saying, nope. The earth is not Flat.
Speaker 7: Correct.
Speaker 4: Okay.
Speaker 5: All of that, it was hours of content. It's all banned now. Crazy is that. I know. Right?
Speaker 0: Okay. Why are they banning it? If it Are they hiding? Why why would they do that? Yeah.
Why, Alex? Right there. Why would they do that?
Speaker 1: Because Google cares about us.
Speaker 5: Alex. Exactly.
Speaker 1: No one bothers a censor, the flat earthers.
Speaker 5: The more informed, the smarter the person, the more likely they are to be connecting the dots that you're
Speaker 8: It's funny that, you know, those flatter videos, you know, that gets, demonized so much, but, it's kind of a
Speaker 5: Know the Earth.
Speaker 2: Not body can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 6: Face is kind of fake. So fake.
Speaker 4: It's so fake. It's just
Speaker 8: It's Islamophobia. I'm a 1000% right.
@sarah__0001 - Sarah π©πΏπ΅πΈ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the past 24 hours in Palestine, over 20,000 hostages were taken by the Israeli occupation, with heavy airstrikes causing injuries and deaths in Gaza. Palestinians mourned loved ones killed in the attacks, while children were injured in bombings. In the West Bank, Israeli settlers and soldiers attacked worshipers at Al Aqsa Mosque.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's what's happened in the past 24 hours in Palestine. There are 7,000 hostages that have been taken from Gaza by the Israeli occupation. In conjunction of the prisoners that have been taken in the West Bank, that makes over 20,000 hostages taken by the Israeli occupation. Heavy Israeli airstrikes targeted several homes in Rafa City today. Dozens of injuries and many were killed in the ongoing bombardment.
Palestinians bid farewell to their relatives who were killed by the Israeli airstrike center Rafah today. This Palestinian tries at all costs to pull his family out of the rubble of their home. A Palestinian boy documents his journey to get the humanitarian aid that were dropped by planes over the north of Gaza today. Palestinian children were injured in the 100 by Israeli airstrike that bombed their homes in Deir al Balah today. Injuries and martyrs arrived at Al Aqsa Martyrs hospital following heavy Israeli air strikes in central Gaza.
In the West Bank, Israeli settlers and soldiers assaulted worshipers while they were leaving Al Aqsa Mosque through Al Khalil gate.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Every city police force in the U.S. operates under a United Nations framework. In constructing the Bend Police Department, two identical locker rooms were built: one for duty uniforms and another for UN uniforms. This reflects a directive from the UN, as outlined in a 1961 publication, instructing police to find ways to confiscate firearms. Police departments receive instructions from the state department, which was evident during the Houston floods when local police had to wear UN gear. Additionally, there are warehouses across the country containing UN vehicles that police chiefs can access only with UN authorization. Licensing departments, including zoning and planning, will also be influenced by this framework, as officials may pledge allegiance to a new world order and good governance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every city police force in the United States is United Nations. Oh, no. I built the dish I built the city of Bend Police Department building. And on the blueprints, there were 2 locker rooms and both rooms were identical. But when I built the city of Bend Police Department building, I had to build 2 locker rooms.
And I said, how come? Because this one's full filled with the duty uniforms, and this one's filled with their United Nations uniforms. If you look at, state house department publication 6227 written in 1961. It's an order from the United Nations to tell the police departments to begin to find ways to confiscate our firearms. The foreign nation has to work through our state department.
So all the police get instructed from the state department. We found this out in Houston, Texas when the floods happened a few years ago, and the Houston city of Houston police department had to put on bullion for us. There's warehouses all over this country with UN Yep. Vehicles. ATACs.
Assault vehicles. You know, all over this country that the chief of police has access to. He can't touch it until the United Nations tells him he has to.
Speaker 1: The licensing departments, whether it's zoning, buildings, housing will be impacted by it, planning certainly. And you pick the people who run those agencies and the deputies that are pledging allusions to the new world order and good governance. And then I think you have the Inspector General.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Integrating foreign genes into chromosomes can lead to cancer and other health issues, permanently altering genetics and affecting future generations. This is a call to recognize the dangers posed by RNA vaccines being introduced globally by organizations like the WHO, CDC, and FDA. The initial vaccines have already shown harmful effects due to the introduction of foreign genes into the body. The production of mRNA does not ensure that these genes, often derived from bacteria, won't enter human cells. As a result, individuals receiving these vaccines may experience genetic alterations, and any genetically altered cell is at risk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately, can cause all sorts of information, and moreover, will cause this gene to be transmitted to your offspring. You will be genetically transformed forever. This is not a hate speech. This is a speech to make everyone wake up and see the dangers that they are facing because the WHO and the CDC and the FDA and all these guys up there are planning to introduce RNA vaccines worldwide everywhere and the first have already been introduced and they are causing the same damage that all the others are going to cause because a foreign gene is entering your body and because the production of this mRNA will never never guarantee that plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells and what this means is that all humans who are injected with these bacterial plasmids or genes are genetically altered. And every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.
@redpillb0t - redpillbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Former state senator Nancy Schafer and her husband Bruce were found dead, raising concerns about the dangers posed by child protective services (CPS) across the nation. Investigators are at their northeast Georgia home searching for clues regarding their sudden deaths, which appear to be a murder-suicide. Schafer expressed strong beliefs that CPS operates as a protective empire focused on separating families, suggesting that the destruction of the family unit is part of a larger agenda. She argued that the only solution may be to completely dismantle CPS and rebuild it with pro-family values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Former state senator Nancy Schafer and her husband Bruce were found dead today. I am convinced without a shadow of a doubt that our the parents across this country need to be warned of the dangers of the child protective services nationwide.
Speaker 1: Tonight, GBI crime scene investigators are at her northeast Georgia home.
Speaker 0: Department of Child Protective Services has become a protected empire.
Speaker 1: They're searching for clues that might tell them
Speaker 0: It's built on taking children and separating families.
Speaker 1: What led to the sudden and violent deaths of miss Schaeffer and her husband?
Speaker 0: The family is going to have to be destroyed in order for the, one world government to completely develop. Preliminary looks to be a murder suicide. Children are being taken away from their parents, in a ruthless kind of behavior. How do you tame child protective service? It may be only by closing it complete and starting over at the beginning with Pro Family Values.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
What actions lead to the greater good in Israel? It's essential to stop those who wish to harm Israelis and Americans. A significant issue is the indoctrination of hatred in children from a young age in Gaza, which must end for long-term peace. We need to eliminate those promoting hate and ensure that children are not taught to hate in any context. Additionally, economic prosperity in Gaza is crucial. Historical examples, like the post-World War II reconstruction of Germany and Japan, show that changing education and fostering economic growth can lead to lasting peace and alliances. Instead of seeking vengeance, we should focus on rebuilding and supporting communities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What set of actions results in the greater good in Israel? I mean, obviously, you you obviously cannot have people who, you know, if if they wanna slaughter everyone in Israel, you you gotta stop that. There's no, you know, there's no way. Yeah. Those people either need to be killed or or incarcerated, or they will simply try to kill more Israelis.
This is where what it amounts to, obviously. And they wanna kill Americans too, by the way. And generally, like, Israel is is referred to as the little Satan in America. We are the big Satan. That that's what the Ayatollah calls us.
A lot of what's happening there is, people are being taught to hate, you know, in in Gaza from when they're, like, children. They're taught to hate. And that that's really the thing that that that needs to stop for there to be, you know, long term long term peace, hopefully. You just cannot have the kids be taught to hate from the moment they can talk. That that's fundamental.
So one has to do the difficult thing, which is to Eliminate a mask. Yes. Eliminate a mask. Exactly. I think also going going forward, anyone who is teaching hatred in the in Gaza or elsewhere, you know, they they need to stop doing that.
That that can't be acceptable. We and we have to stop yet peep kids being taught to hate America in in America. So then the third thing that's also very important is that there has to be economic prosperity in Gaza. So this is very difficult. Provided kids are not taught to hate and there's long term prosperity, I think there will be peace in Gaza.
An example of that, after World War II with Germany and Japan, they were defeated. They obviously did terrible things, but changed the education system. And unlike World War 1, we helped rebuild Japan and Germany. The Marshall Plan. Instead of exacting vengeance, America insisted we're gonna help rebuild Germany.
We're gonna help rebuild Japan, and now they're our allies. And there's been no war ever since.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you oppose Elon Musk and Doge's federal audit, you're involved in money laundering. We deserve to know how our tax dollars are spent. The government's wasteful spending is outrageous; they spend money on ridiculous things, like studying Thanos' snap and animal surgeries. They also wasted billions in USAID.
It's time for a federal auditβa 10% audit is needed because the government is constantly interfering in our lives. Finally, someone is holding them accountable. Tomorrow's Super Bowl will feature Elon Musk's $40 million ad campaign exposing government waste. This is fantastic news!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you have anything negative to say against Elon Musk and Doge doing a federal audit, then I've officially decided that you are a part of the money laundering. It's as simple as that. Because we, the people, deserve to know where all of our money is being spent and what ridiculous spending programs our government is wastefully spending all of our money on. It's not like we get to pick our own salaries like people in congress, but, no, these people have an issue with that, which makes you wonder. Who's funding them?
What are they doing? They're starting to sweat. And you know what I just found out today? Doge is getting access to FEMA's salary history, and I I I am so freaking excited. Stay tuned, everybody, because shit's about to get real.
And also, if you really wanted to know where all of our tax dollars are being spent to at this point, you could just tell me the federal government spent millions of dollars to figure out whether or not Thanos could actually snap the Infinity Gauntlet, and I would believe you. Oh, wait. They actually did that. They also spent money on trying to do trans surgeries for various animals, torturing poor innocent beagle puppies, and spending $4,000,000,000 of USAID on all kinds of stuff with a certain gray haired man in Pouchy. Excuse me.
I'm so sorry. But, anyway, I am so excited. This is great. This is absolutely fantastic. The federal government, a 10%, deserves to be audited because the American people have to deal with you guys up our ass twenty four seven.
It is about time that you felt a little bit of the repercussions of when you f around, you find out. And finally, we have someone who's willing to go put their money where their mouth is. So I can't wait to watch the Super Bowl tomorrow because we're gonna see Super Bowl commercials that Elon Musk paid for himself with $40,000,000 to show all of us how the government is ridiculously spending their money. I'm sorry. Our money.
Because, like, hell, any of them actually have a real job. But, anyway, this is so exciting.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't trust OpenAI. I founded it as an open-source non-profit; the "open" in OpenAI was my doing. Now it's closed source and focused on profit maximization. I don't understand that shift. Sam Altman, despite claims otherwise, has become wealthy, and stands to gain billions more. I don't trust him, and I'm concerned about the most powerful AI being controlled by someone untrustworthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't trust OpenAI. I mean, I you know, I started that company as a nonprofit open source. Yes. The open in OpenAI I named the company. I named the company Yeah.
OpenAI as an open source. And it is now extremely closed source and and maximizing profit. So Does risk I don't understand how you actually go from being a an open source nonprofit to a closed source for maximum profit organization. I'm missing Well, but Sam Aukland got rich, though, didn't he? At various points, he's claimed not to be getting rich, but he's claimed many things that were false.
And now apparently, he's gonna get $10,000,000,000 of stock or something like that. So, I don't trust Sam Altman, and I and I don't think we wanna have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.
@elonmusk - Harry BΕlz
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm leaving the Republican Party because I disagree with their policies. I appreciate your respect, and we can still be friends, even if we disagree politically.
I'm leaving the Democratic Party. It's not about being racist, homophobic, or bigoted; I'm just leaning more conservative now. It's a shift in my political views, not in who I am as a person. We can have political disagreements, but we should agree on basic human values and rights. I'm still the same person you've known since third grade, and I value our friendship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm leaving the Republican Party. Okay. May I ask why? I don't agree with the policies anymore, and I'm leaving left. Okay.
Well, although we can agree to disagree, I really respect you as a friend. I've enjoyed our friendship. And if you ever wanna talk about politics, we can. But we don't have to. Thanks.
I appreciate that. Of course. I'm leaving the Democratic Party. Oh, so you're racist, homophobic, a bigot, and a sexist. What?
No. I'm still me. It's just I don't align with your values anymore, and I find myself leaning more conservative. I mean, I never thought I'd say that. Well, we can disagree on politics, but we can't disagree on human values and human rights.
I'm still me, the person you've known since third grade, and I I really have enjoyed our friendship. Well, last time I checked, I wasn't friends with Nazis.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Instead of addressing wasteful spending, Democrats are attacking the person exposing it. Taxpayers want us to stop funding ridiculous projects, like the transgender comic example from USAID or Bert and Ernie on Baghdad TV. Elon Musk is revealing the federal government's actions, similar to what he did with Twitter.
We found that big government pressured big tech to censor Americans. Mark Zuckerberg admitted the Biden administration pressured them to censor, and they complied, but won't repeat it. Musk is now doing this for the federal government, which we support.
Democrats believe career bureaucrats should run the country, but we believe elected officials should make decisions. The person with 77 million votes wants Musk to expose government waste. We have witnesses, Miss Wade and Mr. Smith, who can testify to the impact of this administrative state on their businesses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister chairman, instead of stopping the stupid spending, Democrats attack the guy who's exposing it. I think the taxpayers of this country would just assume we stop spending their money on dumb things. Like, I'd what was what was the example from USAID, some trans gender comic in Ireland spending money on Bert and Ernie and Big Bird on Baghdad TV? I think they would prefer we not do that. Elon Musk is doing exposing the in the federal government exactly what he exposed at Twitter when he purchased Twitter.
What do we find out there? Big government was pressuring big tech to censor Americans. You don't have to take my word for it. We had the Twitter files. Oh, and we also had someone else in big tech send a letter to this committee and tell us exactly what they were doing.
Mark Zuckerberg said the Biden administration was pressuring us to censor. We did it. We're sorry. We won't do it again. Told the whole world that in a letter to this committee.
So Elon Musk is now doing that for the federal government. We think that's a good thing. And I understand the fundamental difference the left has with us conservatives. Democrats believe it is the career elected bureaucrats who are supposed to run the country. We don't think that's the way it's supposed to work.
We actually think it's the people who put their name on a ballot, who get elected by We The People, who make the decisions. And the guy who got 77,000,000 votes on November 5 says he wants Elon Musk working for him, the elected member who heads the executive branch working for him every bit and much as the federal employees of people in Treasury who were supposed to have all the answers, or in USAID who'd been the career officials working for him to expose stupid things our government is spending money on. And the Democrats are gonna attack that guy? Go ahead. Go right ahead.
But we know the real consequences of having this administrative state, these bureaucrats run things. We got two witnesses here who've lived it. Miss Wade and mister Smith. They're here to tell about how that had some impacted their business. So I appreciate the chairman having this hearing.
This is exactly the kind of hearing we have to have, and I appreciate the work the president and his team are doing to expose the stupid things bureau bureaucrats spend, the hard earned money, the people we get the privilege of representing. I yield back.
@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan
Video Transcript AI Summary
One of the 8,376 Department of Treasury employees launched an investigation into me the day I released one of the Twitter files. Months later, while I was testifying, some of those same employees made an unannounced visit to my home, even though they owed me money.
A judge ruled that political appointees can't access certain information, but thousands of government employees can. USAID is involved in censorship efforts, too, using information operations to manipulate the media. They train NGOs to flag misinformation and strategically leak intelligence to control the news process.
The values of Western civilization, like free speech, are worth fighting for. I have lived in countries where speaking your mind can send you to prison, and now I'm seeing that happen in the West. If we can't settle our disputes with debate, the alternative is frightening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Taybeh, do you have any idea how many people work at the United States Department of Treasury? Oh, I don't. I'm sorry. 108,376. And part of the Department of Treasury, of course, is internal revenue service.
Is that right? Yes. It is. Yeah. Big park, frankly.
Big park. Thousands of people work there too. And on 12/24/2022, '1 of those 8,376 employees at the Department of Treasury decided they were gonna start an investigation into you. Is that right? Yes.
That's my understanding. And that just happened to coincide with the day you did one of the Twitter files, One of them Portland. I think it might maybe in the second one if I'm second or third. But one of those important Twitter files. Is that right?
Yes. It was. It was And then a few months later, you're sitting in that same seat testifying in front of this committee. And the very time you're testifying, another one, there's a 8,376 people knocked on your door, unannounced visit to your home, which, by the way, they've discontinued because of this issue and a bunch of other crazy things they were doing. Is that right?
That's right, mister chairman. And just for the record, they actually owed you money. Right? You didn't do anything wrong. Is that is that accurate?
They did. They owed me quite a lot of money. Yeah. Okay. I just wanna make that clear.
But, obviously, a way to intimidate someone who is focusing on this issue we're discussing today. Right? Yes. We just got an we just got an order from a judge. The judge in the Southern District Of New York said that no political appoint appointees or special government employees can have access to information.
A 8,376 people can have access to information, but the people the president of The United States selects. The guy was elected by 77,000,000 people. He can't preliminary enjoining the a preliminary injunction against the defendants during dependency of this from granting any political appointees, special government employees, from any access to that information. I just I don't know about you, mister Selenberg. I find that kinda troubling.
8,000 people can do it, at least one of them, Christmas Eve. We got a federal government employees working hard on Christmas Eve, probably remotely working, going after mister Taibbi, but the president of The United States can't have people go in and look and see if we can save some money for the taxpayers. He can't do that according to this judge. You think that makes sense, mister Scelberger?
Speaker 1: It doesn't. I mean, my understanding is that the president controls executive branch and
Speaker 0: the executive branch. Article two, section one, very first sentence. Executive power shall be vested in the present not the. In a president of The United States Of America. First sentence.
Yep. Yeah. But this judge says, no. No. No.
We gotta trust the bureau. This is the fundamental issue. You trust the unelected bureaucrats, I think what mister Tiffany and mister McClintock, or do you trust the guy who was elected by the people? And that's that that's where I would rather put our trust in the people who they put in office to do these kind of things. Now you mentioned earlier, mister I'm gonna jump around here and try to get to all of you.
Mister Schellenberger, you mentioned that USAID, which has been in the news of late, spending, taxpayer money and all kinds of stupid things, is also involved in the censorship effort. And I want you to just elaborate on that a little bit because this is going on as we speak. I want you to elaborate on that for the committee, if you would.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I think it's important to understand that USAID viewed this very holistically. And it's important that if you look at the Hunter Biden laptop case, which is an extremely important case to understand because the FBI was weaponized, then it weaponized the Aspen Institute to brainwash the entire media, it wasn't just that they censored it. It was that they changed the perception of the laptop. They they they they created the perception that it was something other than what it obviously was.
And that's what these guys are trying to do. These are called information operations. And USAID has been in the process of taking over so called independent investigative journalism around the world, and at the same time then, training NGOs how to demand censorship. For example, mister Aaron's organization has been working to train organizations to so called flag misinformation behind the scenes. By the way, it's one thing to criticize somebody publicly, which we should all be engaged in.
Yeah.
Speaker 0: But this
Speaker 1: thing where you're skulking around You do that all the time. Secretly yeah. That's that's what that's what OpenDemocracy is. This thing of going out and, like, secretly flagging information behind the scenes and demanding censorship, that is such a that's completely an abomination. That is not what I was talking about.
Speaker 0: Clear. You you're saying USAID, your investigation is now engaged in this prebunking kind of concept and and and process that they did with the laptop story in the fall of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: And it's the exact same approach as well, where often what they're doing, for example, with USAID, OCCRP, is that they're they're leaking intelligence
Speaker 0: from the
Speaker 1: intelligence agencies, in a very and not like WikiLeaks where they just dumped it, I think, probably too much without without the proper redactions. But they're strategically leaking it and then manipulating places like The Guardian and The New York Times to publish certain stories and control the whole investigative news process.
Speaker 0: And we saw this from from Yolrof's testimony. He testified during these weekly meetings that they communicable. Federal law enforcement communicated to us there was gonna be hack and leak operations before the presidential election, likely in in October. We had these so that what's gonna happen, when it's gonna happen, and then they said here who it's gonna involve, that the rumors that the hacker leak operation would involve Hunter Biden. So they set them all up.
And then to say them, they'd set them all up because they had the laptop and they knew what was coming. And when it happens, everyone buys into what the 51 former intel officials say. That's right. Mister Zuppramanian, I wanna give you the last word. RFK, I just want you to I appreciate the historical perspective you brought when you testified last congress, but one of the statements that stuck with this last congress was actually a statement made by RFK Junior When he said, when you look at history, it is never the good guys who were for censorship.
And that's what we're trying to keep in mind and stop it from both sides, from all sides. We just don't we want the first amendment. I'll give you the last thirty seconds here to respond. Absolutely.
Speaker 2: I mean, as as you mentioned earlier, and when I was here the last time, I think it was a throwaway comment to a representative. It was not even part of my testimony. I don't think so. And I said, the values of Western civilization are worth fighting for, going back to the enlightenment and the reformation. That is what gave us free speech.
That's what distinguishes us from the rest of the world. And the first amendment in America distinguishes America from the rest of the world. I come from India originally. I live in Canada. I'm from Canada.
But I've lived in India. I've lived in The Middle East. I've lived in places where just speaking your mind can send you to prison. You cannot criticize anything that goes against the government or certain religions for that matter. And when I came to the West, it was, you know, refreshing to finally be able to express myself.
And, unfortunately, unfortunately, what I left behind has come to me in Canada, has followed me to Canada. And I'm seeing that happening in The United States. And it's very worrying because it's happened so quickly, and I don't know where this is gonna lead us to.
Speaker 1: Yeah. If we if
Speaker 0: we can't settle our disputes with debate, the alternative is frightening, and we never wanna get there. So I appreciate all of you. I appreciate the the from both sides. I mean, we we we wanna embrace the first minute.
@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump
@QueTCroketa - KettyLove
@deebobbcmaster - deebobbcmaster
@QueTCroketa @RichardEntuboca any updates for me? https://t.co/hIZKEGyZvp
@DickAlupinya247 - Richard Allupinya
@JulieBove81 - Julie Bovenizer