@shockproofbeats - The author, Séamas O'Reilly
what's the best email you've ever received? i'll go first https://t.co/3VRCKgTiqX
@DocNetyoutube - Black Insurrectionist--I FOLLOW BACK TRUE PATRIOTS
I have been asked to post receipts about by emails to the VP. This is the email I received from my 8-23-2024 submission asking for comment. https://t.co/REMlT6p9fb
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
BREAKING: @Weaponization just dropped a MASSIVE 17,000-page report on the Biden Admin's weaponized federal government. Emails reveal an alarming level of collusion between DHS/CISA, Stanford University, the Atlantic Council, and Big Tech to create the "Election Integrity Partnership's" censorship machine. • Graham Brookie of the Atlantic Council's DFR Labs wrote: "We just set up an election integrity partnership at the request of DHS/CISA." • A redacted Facebook executive spilled the beans in an email about a call with DHS, saying: "DHS cannot openly endorse the portal." • Alex Stamos of the Stanford Internet Observatory emailed NextDoor executives: "We already have partnerships with Facebook, Twitter, and Google, and we would love to chat with you and your team." This is some next-level dystopian sh*t. So how does the Trump admin make sure this BS doesn't happen again?
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
Final Report: The Weaponization of the Federal Government https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/final-report-weaponization-federal-government
@BehizyTweets - George
Bombshell emails leaked revealing that Arizona election officials were engaged in a RICO-level operation to rig elections by censoring voters. In an email thread, Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Ritcher coordinated with States United, a leftist NGO, to censor a voter's speech & even tried to get him fired from his job at Arizona State University. I hope our next Attorney General takes this extremely seriously.
@BehizyTweets - George
Richer started by asking: "Can States United advise me on if a "retweet" is grounds for making a complaint and, if so, how I do so?" States United promptly responded: "We'll discuss internally and circle back to you as soon as we can." But it didn't stop there. https://t.co/qeMtRH3G6m
@BehizyTweets - George
Recorder Stephen Richer contacted Arizona State University and demanded Ludwig's firing, "I ask that you assess if he is fit to be part of the ASU faculty." "He is a regular purveyor of election disinformation and misformation." Someone put this sick, gingered tyrant in jail and throw away the keys. All these emails were obtained by @WethePeopleAZA1.
@BehizyTweets - George
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand just how illegal & unconstitutional this is. Where in the Arizona Constitution or law book does it empower elected officials to use their office to violate the 1st amendment rights of a voter? Where does it say Richer has the authority to seek to end someone's employment because he doesn't like their speech? This is just one of many instances. The consequences must be severe for these people. We need a special prosecutor to go after the censorship cartel and another prosecutor to go after the election fraud cartel. We can start by prosecuting the voting machine companies that lied about their machines' capabilities to connect to the Internet.
@MrAndyNgo - Andy Ngo
New: Janet Petro, the President-Trump-appointed acting director of NASA, has sent a message informing all NASA staff that it is shutting down all DEI offices and DEI contracts. The message says the agency knows government employees are trying to disguise DEI by using new names and vague language. (This is documented.) It tells staff to report those violations for investigation.
@growing_daniel - Daniel
federal employees are suing over the idea that the President can email the executive branch https://t.co/VmjuN6FPTK
@growing_daniel - Daniel
I really fell off hard from my no politics pledge
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
The Class Action Lawsuit filed against OPM on the same day that I testified (coincidentally) is a way bigger deal than people realize. [Hillary Clinton's Private Server] This 🧵 is for those who do their own research & can see the connections. A Fork in the road indeed... ♟️
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
What OPM Did by Sending Out This “Fork in the Road” Memo The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), by sending out this deferred resignation offer, executed a strategic workforce purge under the directive of President Trump’s administration. This move is not just a restructuring effort—it is a deliberate mechanism to cleanse the federal workforce of problematic, inefficient, and potentially corrupt employees while also consolidating power under a more controlled and accountable framework. Here’s what OPM effectively achieved by sending this memo: 1. Created an Orderly Exit Strategy for Non-Compliant or Potentially Corrupt Employees The deferred resignation offer provides a graceful way for employees to leave voluntarily, rather than being fired or investigated. Employees who know they are vulnerable (due to misconduct, inefficiency, political bias, or corruption) can take this exit without public scandal. The resignation is voluntary, but inaction could result in forced termination due to new workplace standards. 2. Legally Weakened Protections for Problematic Employees The document states that many federal employees will be reclassified as "at-will" employees, meaning: They lose job security protections. They can be fired more easily without lengthy administrative appeals. This reduces the power of entrenched bureaucrats who have used civil service protections to remain in government indefinitely. Employees engaged in fraud, insider dealing, or illicit influence can no longer hide behind tenure protections. 3. Set the Stage for a Federal Workforce Purge OPM has effectively issued a soft ultimatum: Leave quietly via resignation or Stay and risk termination under new standards. This means employees who: Have been engaged in backdoor dealings. Have used government access to enrich themselves. Have abused contracting and grants. Have leaked classified or sensitive information. Have obstructed administration directives. Have influenced policy in ways contrary to the executive order→ Are now being forced into a corner. 4. Isolated Military, Postal Service, and National Security Employees from This Process The memo excludes: Military personnel U.S. Postal Service employees Immigration enforcement and national security positions This suggests that the restructuring mainly affects the civilian administrative workforce, which: Includes agencies historically involved in deep bureaucracy, federal spending, and policymaking. Is where inefficiencies, insider deals, and political obstruction often occur. 5. Eliminated Remote Work Loopholes That Allowed Undetected Corruption The mandate requires employees to return to the office five days a week. Many who have operated fraudulent activities from remote locations will no longer be able to do so. Decentralized fraud schemes that relied on minimal oversight will collapse as employees are forced to work under direct physical supervision. This also cuts off government resources for “ghost employees” who may have been collecting paychecks without actually working. 6. Introduced a Mechanism to Track and Report Resignations Employees who accept the resignation program will have their exit formally processed through OPM, meaning: The government now has an official list of who chose to leave. Future re-employment in federal agencies may be restricted for these individuals. This ensures that those who leave under this program do not easily re-enter government service elsewhere. 7. Strengthened Performance Expectations & Code of Conduct The new "performance culture" demands high efficiency and accountability. This prevents the continuation of politically motivated, inefficient, or corrupt administrative behaviors. Federal employees will now be required to meet high performance metrics, meaning: Employees who previously coasted or manipulated the system will struggle to remain. There will be greater transparency and accountability in hiring, promotions, and retention. 8. Forced a Response That Identifies Who Will Comply and Who Will Resist The requirement for employees to reply with "Resign" from their .gov/.mil emails is a trapdoor mechanism: It forces employees to make a definitive decision. It collects data on who accepts or rejects the new system. Those who do not respond may later be targeted for removal under the new standards. 9. Sent a Clear Message That the Administrative Bureaucracy Will No Longer Operate as It Did Before This policy signals a fundamental shift in the federal government’s approach to workforce management. It is a strong rejection of past bureaucratic stagnation, inefficiency, and unaccountability. Those who oppose this shift will either leave voluntarily or be forced out. Conclusion: OPM Just Initiated a Bureaucratic Revolution
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
The "Fork in the Road" policy has significant implications for federal workers, particularly those who may be exploiting their positions, access, and privileges within the U.S. government system. Here’s an in-depth analysis of how this policy will impact such individuals: 1. Increased Accountability & Security Measures The return-to-office mandate and enhanced performance culture reduce opportunities for remote fraud or unauthorized use of government resources. Employees who have been leveraging .gov and .mil email domains for personal, political, or financial gain will face greater scrutiny. The restoration of accountability for those with policy-making authority suggests stricter oversight of government officials who award contracts, approve grants, or influence procurement. 2. Impact on Government Contractors & Grants Federal employees who may be using their positions to unfairly distribute contracts or grants will now have to adhere to heightened merit-based hiring and performance standards. Stricter performance reviews may expose past favoritism, cronyism, or conflicts of interest in awarding contracts. Military branches and select agencies may see workforce increases, but others will be downsized through restructuring—eliminating redundancies and potentially cutting off fraudulent contracting pipelines. 3. Termination & Forced Resignation for Those Engaged in Misconduct “Enhanced Standards of Conduct” means employees engaged in unlawful activities, fraud, or misconduct will be prioritized for termination. The document explicitly states that disciplinary measures, including termination, will be enforced for those failing to meet new standards. Individuals exploiting insider access for personal gain (e.g., insider trading, awarding contracts to friends/family, leaking sensitive information) could be forced out under this restructuring. 4. At-Will Employment & Reduction in Workforce Many federal employees will be reclassified as "at-will" employees, meaning they lose tenure protections and can be fired more easily. Mass layoffs, furloughs, and forced resignations will hit agencies with bloated budgets, inefficiencies, and suspected abuse of government resources. This could serve as a mechanism to purge employees involved in questionable financial dealings or intelligence leaks. 5. Threat to Established “Deep State” Networks & Embedded Bureaucrats Career bureaucrats who have operated with unchecked influence over policy and resource distribution may now lose their positions or face investigations. Federal employees using .gov/.mil domains to manipulate policies, push ideological agendas, or conduct backdoor deals could be forced out through the resignation program. This disrupts long-standing power structures where unelected officials have controlled policy through insider networks. 6. Financial & Operational Disruptions to Corrupt Networks Those leveraging government grants, stimulus funds, or special interest programs for personal gain could see their access revoked. Tighter restrictions on telework prevent offsite operations where fraud could occur (e.g., operating shell companies, directing federal funds to private entities). Physical relocations due to office restructuring could disrupt networks involved in internal lobbying, collusion, or illicit influence campaigns. 7. Voluntary Resignation as a Safe Exit Strategy The deferred resignation option allows corrupt individuals to leave quietly rather than facing investigation or termination. Employees who know they are at risk of exposure for fraudulent activities may take the opportunity to resign rather than be fired. *However, this does not necessarily protect them from future legal or criminal investigations if wrongdoing is later uncovered.* Conclusion The Fork in the Road policy appears designed to reform the federal workforce, remove bad actors, and reassert accountability. This move threatens those who have exploited government systems for personal, financial, or political gain. Employees using .gov or .mil domains to manipulate contracts, grants, and government access may find themselves either: Pushed out through restructuring Investigated and terminated for misconduct Forced to resign before potential exposure For those engaged in corruption, favoritism, and backdoor dealings, this represents a major shake-up of their operations.
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
The "Fork in the Road" Policy prompted a Class Action Lawsuit... CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS ARE VERY EFFECTIVE. High-Level Overview of the OPM Class Action Lawsuit Case Information - Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - Plaintiffs: Jane Doe 1 & Jane Doe 2 (representing a class of U.S. Executive Branch employees) - Defendant: Office of Personnel Management (OPM) - Case Number: 1:25-cv-00234 - Filed: January 27, 2025 Key Allegations The plaintiffs, representing all similarly affected U.S. Executive Branch employees, are suing OPM under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, and the All Writs Act. The core claim is that OPM unlawfully created and tested an email distribution and response system without conducting a legally required Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) under the E-Government Act of 2002. Class Action Scope The class includes: - All Executive Branch employees who received test emails from HR@opm.gov (between January 23-27, 2025) instructing them to confirm receipt. - All employees whose personally identifiable information (PII) is stored in the system, even if they did not receive an email. Background & Timeline of Events 1. January 23, 2025: OPM publicly announced it was testing a new system to send mass emails to all civilian federal employees. 2. January 24, 2025: Plaintiffs received an email from HR@opm.gov instructing them to respond with "YES" to confirm receipt. 3. January 26, 2025: A second test email was sent, repeating the instructions. 4. January 27, 2025: - Plaintiff Doe 2 responded "YES." - A whistleblower leaked information in a Reddit post, alleging: - The system was set up secretly by political appointees. - Employee data was being collected and sent to Amanda Scales, an employee of xAI (a company owned by Elon Musk). - An unauthorized email server was physically installed inside OPM’s building, outside of normal IT security protocols. Legal Violations Claimed 1. Failure to Conduct a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) - The E-Government Act of 2002 mandates that any new system collecting personally identifiable information (PII) must undergo a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) before implementation. - OPM failed to complete, review, or publish any PIA for the email system, violating 44 U.S.C. § 3501. 2. Risk to Employees’ PII - The lawsuit argues that OPM’s failure to conduct a PIA exposes federal employees’ data to unauthorized access, similar to the 2014 OPM data breach that compromised millions of government employees’ records. 3. Unlawful Withholding of Information - Under 5 U.S.C. § 706(1), OPM’s failure to disclose and assess the system constitutes "agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed." Relief Sought The plaintiffs request: 1. A court ruling that OPM’s actions violated the E-Government Act. 2. An injunction prohibiting OPM from collecting or storing employee data until a proper PIA is completed. 3. A mandate requiring OPM to publicly release all PIAs for the system. 4. Legal fees and costs awarded to plaintiffs. 5. Expedited processing due to the urgency of the data security risks. Key Takeaways - Potential security risks: If true, the claims suggest unauthorized access and possible external involvement in handling federal employees’ personal data. - Precedent for government IT security: If the plaintiffs succeed, it could force stricter adherence to privacy laws in federal agencies. - Connection to private entities: The lawsuit raises concerns about outsourcing government data to private companies like xAI.
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
The OPM class action lawsuit and Hillary Clinton's private email server controversy share several key similarities and differences, particularly in terms of legal violations, security risks, and government transparency. Key Similarities A. Potential Unauthorized Handling of Government Data Hillary Clinton’s Email Server: – Clinton used a private, unsecured email server for official State Department communications. – This server was outside government control, raising concerns about classified information exposure and potential foreign hacking. OPM Class Action Lawsuit: – The plaintiffs allege that an unauthorized email system was secretly installed within OPM’s network. –This system collected and stored Executive Branch employee data, potentially forwarding it to a private company (xAI, linked to Elon Musk). B. Failure to Follow Government Protocols Clinton’s Case: – Government officials are required to use .gov email accounts for official business. – Clinton’s private email use bypassed federal record-keeping laws and security checks. OPM Case: OPM allegedly failed to conduct a required Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) under the E-Government Act of 2002. The lawsuit claims an unknown email server was set up outside standard IT security measures. C. Risk of Foreign Espionage & Cybersecurity Threats Clinton’s Server: – The FBI found that foreign adversaries may have hacked Clinton’s private server, exposing classified information. – The controversy revolved around mishandling of classified documents, though the FBI concluded no direct evidence of hacking. OPM's Secret Email System: The lawsuit argues that OPM's unknown email system lacks encryption and security protocols. If foreign intelligence services became aware of this server, they could attempt to infiltrate it, much like they did in the 2014 OPM data breach, which compromised millions of government employees' sensitive information. *The Key Difference* is one is totally private... The other is through the official .gov and .mil domains. 3. How the OPM Case Could Set a Precedent If the lawsuit succeeds, it could set legal precedent reinforcing that:Government agencies must follow strict privacy laws before implementing new systems. Unauthorized IT systems handling government data are a major security risk. Outsourcing federal data to private companies (xAI) could be a conflict of interest or a national security risk. Transparency requirements in government communications and cybersecurity must be enforced more strictly. The Clinton email case resulted in:No criminal charges, but FBI scrutiny over handling classified material. Political fallout and reforms in email security policies for future government officials. The OPM case could: Expose deeper structural issues in government IT security policies. Lead to stricter enforcement of Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs). Reveal if Executive Branch employee data was improperly shared with private entities. 4. Bottom Line While Clinton’s email controversy focused on government transparency and the mishandling of classified information, the OPM class action lawsuit centers on federal employee data privacy, cybersecurity risks, and possible external influence in government IT infrastructure. The major concern in both cases is that sensitive government information was handled outside official, regulated channels, increasing vulnerability to hacking, espionage, and unauthorized access.
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
Let that sink in... 🥳 https://t.co/6yrSErnQtB
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
This is the most insane thread I have ever read. There are federal employees from USAID, DHS, CISA all plotting to subvert a duly elected administration. I really hope there’s somebody on the Trump team who has gone through the list of names in this wild thread of subterfuge so they can at least fire them if they still work in the federal government.
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
Gotta love watching DC judges who for four f*cking years did nothing but rage about efforts to "overturn the 2020 election" in Jan 6 cases now brazenly defy the will of the people who elected Donald Trump. Amy Berman Jackson (Obama) just reinstated Hampton Dellinger, the Biden-appointed head of the Office of Special Counsel, who was fired by the president on Feb 7. He filed a lawsuit yesterday and ABJ, like her colleagues on the DC bench, immediately put his firing on hold. ABJ: "Plaintiff Hampton Dellinger shall continue to serve as the Special Counsel of the Office of Special Counsel, the position he occupied at 7:22 p.m. on Friday, February 7, 2025 when he received an email from the President, and the defendants may not deny him access to the resources or materials of that office or recognize the authority of any other person as Special Counsel." In response to this egregious overreach by another well documented hater of the president, the DOJ asked Berman to put a hold on her own order, which they described as "an extraordinary—indeed, unprecedented—intrusion into the President’s authority." DOJ: "As a result of the Court’s order, a person the President has chosen to remove from office is exercising executive power over the President’s objection. That sort of harm to the Executive, and to the constitutional separation of powers, is transparently irreparable." DOJ also filed an appeal today before DC Circuit--the appeal is being handled by NONE OTHER THAN FLO PAN AND MICHELLE CHILDS--two Biden appointees and two of the four lower court judges responsible for the reckless presidential immunity opinion reversed by SCOTUS in July. Responses due tomorrow.
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
Here is what Amy Berman Jackson considers "irreparable harm" 😂 https://t.co/Rky03SrBwZ
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
EXC: Here’s a LONG list of groups funded by Mark Zuckerberg that are actively sabotaging the Trump presidency through lawfare, ICE raid interference, lobbying, and mass protest. Funds comes from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative or Forward US (founded by Zuck in 2013). 🧵🧵🧵
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
Zuckerberg ran to the @NYTimes for cover after I exposed his ties to nonprofits bankrolling lawsuits against President Trump. You thought this would intimidate me? It proves I hit a nerve.
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
1) CASA is currently suing the Trump administration over their Birthright Citizenship Executive Order. CASA also has an active tip hotline to dox ICE raids and agents. They’ve received at least $250,000 from Forward US. https://t.co/diLvPeEdLE
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
2) Forward US has donated to Make The Road States, which published a “Deportation Defense Manual,” instructing illegal aliens how to avoid ICE raids. This includes instructing them to lie to ICE agents and law enforcement. The group is also suing Trump over mass deportations. https://t.co/7bXk3HSNhR
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
3) Forward US has donated to VoteVets Action Fund, an organization the actively opposed and campaigned against the nomination of @PeteHegseth. They also put out ads attacking Trump’s spending freeze and smeared his immigration crackdown. https://t.co/jljyAn6JYX
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
4) CZI donated at least $500,000 to Common Justice, a far-left group pledging to “resist POTUS’s efforts to criminalize immigration.” Common Justice is also part of Protect Democracy, the leading coalition of left-wing groups suing Trump. https://t.co/vc6zhgtafA
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
5) The Obama alum hotbed think tank - the Center for American Progress - is currently lobbying Congress to “defend America against Trump’s Power Grab” and mobilizing academics and activists to achieve this. CAP belongs to Democracy Forward, the leading legal organization of left-wing groups suing Trump.
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
6) CZI has given $550,000 to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center per @capitalresearch. This group has condemned Trump’s immigration agenda, pledging to “continue to work to defeat Trump’s immigration enforcement priorities.” https://t.co/Cf9biaYd6l
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
7) CZI has given $200,000 to American Immigration Council, an open borders advocacy group that has criticized Trump’s immigration crackdown as “propaganda” and “fearmongering.” They’ve pledged to fight all his Executive Orders. https://t.co/n8qlRLTBLE
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
8) MoveOn, a notorious far-left organizing group, is gathering activists to oppose Trump via mass demonstrations, petitions, and calls to lawmakers. They were a key 2016 Resistance organization. https://t.co/n3zVeClPpJ
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
9) House Majority Forward, which has received $150,000 from Forward US, has cut several anti-Trump ads airing across national media. https://t.co/o0HKsp4NSY
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
10) LUCHA, another Forward US grant recipient, has pledged to “never cede ground” or “back down” against the Trump presidency and their immigration agenda. https://t.co/3Nm9J77sPD
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
11) CZI also supported the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, which opposed the Laken Riley Act claiming it was “anti-black.” https://t.co/zla3kZ1MVm
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
12) CZI has repeatedly given six-figure grants to Haitian Bridge Alliance, which opposed the Laken Riley Act, TPS termination for Venezuelans, and using Gitmo to detain illegal aliens. https://t.co/7ScbAfzwox
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
13) Radical immigration activist group America’s Voice has received $200,000 from Forward US while lobbying against Trump’s “enforcement” of immigration law and attacking his policies as “harmful.” https://t.co/ApxbYrMyF7
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
14) The Justice Action Center has pledged to fight Trump in court over immigration restrictions and has received grants from Forward US. https://t.co/xodKhTvSUg
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
15) The Latin American Association, a Forward US grant recipient, is helping illegal aliens avoid deportation. https://t.co/rqOnSjk2uO
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
16) United We Dream is running several pressure campaigns against lawmakers to ensure they oppose Trump's immigration agenda and is threatening lawsuits. https://t.co/VOgZXNVLm3
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
So, yet again, the @nytimes is wrong. Would you like to update this story @teddyschleifer? https://t.co/UFpLukpCEZ
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
@nytimes @teddyschleifer Also, they're deleting grants from the CZI website! MASSIVE attempted coverup underway. https://t.co/Xr1lYjXFGG
@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters
@nytimes @teddyschleifer @threadreaderapp unroll
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
UPDATE: @WalshJesuit sent a letter to families condemning the unhinged email sent anonymously by one of their staff members stating that political commentary by teachers "has no place in our school." The school also announced they are opening up an internal investigation into the matter but will not be making any public statements on this controversy. After exposing the email, @WalshJesuit locked down all of their social media accounts and blocked us.
@Yamiche - Yamiche Alcindor
Top leadership at the State Department has instructed its employees to ignore @elonmusk’s productivity inquiry, saying, essentially—we will evaluate our own people. A sign not all Trump officials are on board with Musk’s DOGE email. https://t.co/9tsufc1rXA
@matt_vanswol - Matt Van Swol
This was just leaked to me by an employee at NOAA. The Director of the Office for Coastal Management is telling his staff to actively ignore Elon’s email to federal employees. Yikes. https://t.co/NQsaLB8Ad6
@matt_vanswol - Matt Van Swol
@elonmusk and @DOGE… might want to look into this
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Those who do not take this email seriously will soon be furthering their career elsewhere
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
Federal workers sue over "what did you do last week" email. Because Norm Eisen and Civil Service Strong, the shadow organization stacked with Obama loyalists is funding and organizing all of these lawsuits.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
The email request was utterly trivial, as the standard for passing the test was to type some words and press send! Yet so many failed even that inane test, urged on in some cases by their managers. Have you ever witnessed such INCOMPETENCE and CONTEMPT for how YOUR TAXES are being spent? Makes old Twitter look good. Didn’t think that was possible.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Exactly
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Ahem, we said 5 items and that’s only 4
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
The President has made it clear that this is mandatory for the executive branch. Anyone working on classified or other sensitive matters is still required to respond if they receive the email, but can simply reply that their work is sensitive.
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
🚨 INCREDIBLE: Trump just signed an order to ELIMINATE EIGHT federal agencies! Have you ever seen ANYTHING like this??? This is a MASSIVE and UNPRECEDENTED move. Let me break it down for you... 🧵
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
1/ The order is Trump's latest attack on the Deep State, the unconstitutional array of unaccountable "independent" agencies. He's giving agency heads 7 DAYS to justify their existence or face the chopping block. HINT: They can't. https://www.rodmartin.org/p/elections-have-to-matter-independent
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
2/ The targets? EIGHT agencies: - Voice of America's corrupt Marxist parent (USAGM) - Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service - Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars - Arctic Research Commission And more. The question: why is any of this part of government...
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
3/ HUGE: Last night, VOA nominee @KariLake told staff to check emails "IMMEDIATELY." Multiple employees already placed on administrative leave. The $900M agency that Trump's been gunning for since Term 1 is finally on the block 🎯
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
@KariLake 4/ Why this matters: USAGM reaches 100+ countries in 60+ languages. During the Cold War it was a voice of hope to millions enslaved by Communism. No longer. Now it is irredeemably Communist itself!
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
@KariLake 5/ Now conservative icon @BrentBozell -- nephew of William F. Buckley and founder of the Media Research Center (conservative watchdog) -- is nominated to lead what's left of it. Brent will take a blowtorch to it. And he should.
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
@KariLake @BrentBozell 6/ The mastermind behind this? None other than @ElonMusk, heading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Of course.
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
@KariLake @BrentBozell @elonmusk 7/ 🔥 DOGE's impact so far: - 100,000+ job cuts coming - Foreign aid frozen & 83% of programs ENDED - $115B in taxpayer savings - Thousands of wasteful and fraudulent contracts canceled
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
8/ But that's just the warm-up. Trump wants to identify and eliminate $2 TRILLION in waste by July 4, 2026. That's not a typo. Two. Trillion. Dollars. 🤯
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
9/ Don't let the Enemedia lie to you: Americans are LOVING this. Latest Epoch Times poll shows overwhelming support for these cuts. https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/doge-wins-approval-but-many-seek-greater-access-to-findings-epoch-readers-poll-5809682
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
10/10 Trump promised "historic" government reform, and he's delivering. The swamp creatures are running scared. If you enjoyed this content, please like and share; and also, sign up for your FREE subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🚨🇺🇸 FEDERAL JUDGE TAKES OVER USAID HIRING — BLOCKS TRUMP PICK Judge Theodore D. Chuang has barred Jeremy Lewin, a former DOGE team member, from becoming Deputy Administrator of USAID. Instead of letting the administration make its own staffing decisions, Judge Chuang decided Lewin’s loyalty to Trump disqualified him. Government lawyers asked for clarity — the judge flat-out denied it and warned he could expand the ban if they try any workarounds. In effect, one judge is now acting as the self-appointed HR department for the federal government... Source: @amuse
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
Remember the NY FBI field office chief who strutted out of the building last month to bagpipers and weeping FBI employees after being asked to resign for insubordination related to internal investigation of FBI’s handling of J6 cases? James Dennehy was involved in the Hunter Biden laptop coverup. In 2020, Dennehy was special agent in charge of NY FBI’s Counterintelligence and Cyber Division.
@HarmeetKDhillon - Harmeet K. Dhillon
Reminder that the more people you copy on your unsolicted email to to my work email address, the less likely I am to read your email. Exponentially so. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics
RFK Jr. NEEDS your help! The mRNA lobby is in full meltdown, pressuring Trump to overturn RFK’s decision to end funding for mRNA vaccines. Now MAHA insiders are calling on you to speak up. “The Secretary needs your support now, more than ever.” Short thread🧵 https://t.co/CNyCtrP450
@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics
Bookmark and share this thread to spread the word—RFK Jr. needs our help now:🧵
@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics
Earlier this week, RFK Jr. made a stunning move as HHS Secretary. After a full review, the agency concluded that mRNA vaccines carry more risk than reward—and canceled 22 development projects, pulling $500 million in funding. “Over the past few weeks, BARDA reviewed 22 mRNA vaccine development investments and began canceling them.” He said the decision came after consulting top scientists at NIH and the FDA. “After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.” The main concern? These vaccines fail to protect against upper respiratory infections like Covid and flu. “Most of these shots are for flu or Covid, but as the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don’t perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.” Instead, HHS will invest in broader, more reliable vaccine platforms that don’t fall apart when viruses mutate. “To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we’re prioritizing the development of safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms that don’t collapse when viruses mutate.” He made it clear—this isn’t an attack on vaccines, it’s a shift toward safer, more effective ones. “Let me be absolutely clear, HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them.” That’s why the department is moving on from mRNA and toward real solutions. “That’s why we’re moving beyond the limitations of mRNA for respiratory viruses and investing in better solutions.”
@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics
People were cheering RFK Jr.’s bold move—Until President Trump weighed in from the White House. He made clear the mRNA lobby is still in his ear, confirming he’ll be meeting about the cancellations Thursday. “We have meetings about it Thursday at 12:00.” He even praised Operation Warp Speed, the very program that pushed mRNA into overdrive. “Operation Warp Speed is one of the most incredible things ever done in this country… Everything about it was has been amazing.”
@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics
Trump’s response sent shockwaves through the MAHA movement. Even insiders like ACIP member Dr. Robert Malone are sounding the alarm. The mRNA lobby is pushing hard to get Trump to reverse RFK Jr.’s decision. Now Dr. Malone is calling on all of us to act. “I really need to you use your social media channels and accounts to contact the White House and President Trump to immediately voice your support for Secretary Kennedy’s decision to eliminate federal subsidies for the development of mRNA-based respiratory virus vaccines.” “This must be done now.” “A key meeting has been called on short notice, and will be held today in the White House.”
@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics
It’s not just Dr. Malone raising the alarm. Top MAHA officials are seeing the pressure firsthand. Gray Delaney, Director of MAHA Implementation and External Affairs, says the mRNA lobby is in full panic mode in DC. And RFK Jr. needs our support more than ever. “From a political perspective, the mRNA lobby in Washington is huge.” “We really need our network to support this decision to amplify the message, and to have the secretary's back.” “There is an active effort to divide us, and the Secretary really needs your support now, more than ever.”
@JohnnyReb1989 - A.P. Hill Legacy Foundation
⚠️ MASSIVE Epstein files thread. 🧵 I've spent over 8 1/2 hours reading through the files for everyone. NO edits! Strictly just screenshots from the DOJ website! I will also continue to update and add more as I go.
@JohnnyReb1989 - A.P. Hill Legacy Foundation
Using coded language to talk about CHILDREN. Also saying, "you throw away the head and keep the body." They were performing satanic rituals on CHILDREN. https://t.co/RmAtu3YXDI
@JohnnyReb1989 - A.P. Hill Legacy Foundation
He said, "you throw away the head and keep the body" referring to adrenochrome. They are performing satanic rituals on children and making jokes about it.