TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @wdunlap

Saved - April 21, 2025 at 1:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Benny Johnson attended a Tesla protest with Rep. Byron Donalds, who questioned the protesters about their grievances. They responded with accusations of being "fascist," "race traitor," and other derogatory terms. Another participant asserted that the true fascists are known.

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

I went to a Tesla protest with Florida’s next Governor, Rep. Byron Donalds. He calmly asked a simple question: ‘What are you protesting?’ The response: “Fascist.” “Race traitor.” “Nazi.” “Uncle Tom.” This is the racist, intolerant Left. Watch Byron roll them like a champ: 👊🏼 https://t.co/5u9gBKIRLl

Video Transcript AI Summary
A member of Congress was asked to support LGBTQ+ youth and stop attacks on children, but was called a fascist and race trader after disagreeing with the questioner. The Congress member was also asked about electric vehicles and policies in Florida over the last 25 years. The discussion shifted to whether New York or Florida is governed better, with one person stating people are choosing Florida. Another person planned to register poor people and felons to vote in the Congress member's district. The conversation then turned to who the Nazis are, with accusations leveled against Republicans and Elon Musk. Healthcare was discussed, with the Affordable Care Act criticized for high deductibles and premiums. The Congress member offered to work together on solutions for mental health issues. The Congress member was called a Nazi, which led to a request for an apology and a handshake. The Congress member identified as a conservative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would like to make this. Speaker 1: Tell me it was your district. Speaker 2: Listen. When you're running for governor, everywhere is your district. I'm trying to figure out what it is you guys are actually doing. Speaker 1: That is unease in Speaker 3: the lottery. Speaker 2: You do realize that now these don't like to agree. Right? What do you want us to agree on? Speaker 0: Congress because I was Speaker 1: just in DC on Monday to transcend visibility, and I would like you as a member of congress to rise up and support LGBTQ plus youth and stop this insane attack on our children who know who they are because you're a fascist. How can trace Speaker 2: your sexist? Because I do not believe in the mutilation of children, I'm a fascist now. When I ask you a question When you vote for I ask you a question and then you say you don't agree with me? Speaker 1: My children. Speaker 4: I ask you a question. Speaker 2: You call me a fascist? You call me a race trader? Do you want me to agree with you? What are you talking about, ma'am? Speaker 4: Are you against electric vehicles? I am against the Republican Party of Florida for having control of the Speaker 2: Governor's Mansion for twenty five years. What policy in Florida the last twenty five years that you don't agree with? Speaker 4: Alright. What I believe you Speaker 2: should do right now is is study the law. But, sir, I spent four years in the legislature. And that was I wrote some of the Right. I know you So some of the I'm asking you, which one? Alright. Speaker 0: There are too many to name right now. Speaker 2: Last question. Seriously, last question. Speaker 0: You give me yeah. I'll give you a Speaker 2: last New York or Florida? Which state is governed better? New York or Florida? Speaker 4: It's completely New York. Why don't you live in New York? Why don't you live Speaker 0: in New York? Don't New York? All Speaker 2: I'm gonna Speaker 4: say is Because I live Speaker 2: in Florida. People choose Florida. They've been coming here more than going the other way. When you vote with your feet, it matters. Speaker 5: I'm gonna come to your district and register a lot of poor people. I'm gonna register them. I'm gonna get the felons that have their voting rights taken away that don't even know they can vote still now. I worked on felons voting rights in Florida seven years ago. Speaker 2: You ready? You wanna Speaker 5: I'm gonna come to your district, I'm gonna register something. People have nothing but time. Speaker 2: Do you remember the amendment about restoration of voting rights? You ready? I endorsed it. Speaker 4: Yes. I supported it. Speaker 2: I'm still trying to figure out who are the Nazis now. Speaker 3: I think you guys. Like, I don't Speaker 2: understand why. Nazi? What are you Speaker 4: what are talking the Show Nazi salute that Elon gave. What what do you mean? Which one? Just do You Speaker 2: do it. Speaker 4: No. You do it. Speaker 2: I'm trying to figure out where where who are the Nazis and Speaker 4: where are they? Oh, the Republicans in the Nazi party. Speaker 2: Why do you say that? Speaker 4: Because they supported Nazis. Speaker 2: Who's the Nazi? Elon Musk was the Naz. Based upon what? Speaker 4: Based on the Nazis salute the Nazi. He didn't do it? Why do not why did he say that the Nazi? Speaker 3: So why should three hundred twenty five thousand people go bankrupt every year because of doctor's bills? Speaker 2: The current law for health care Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 2: Is a democrat law. Speaker 3: Oh, yeah. Speaker 2: The Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. Deductibles are higher. Speaker 4: Okay. Speaker 2: Premiums are higher. Speaker 3: What's your Speaker 2: People are not actually getting the care that they need because democrats don't wanna do anything. They wanna keep it the way Speaker 6: it is. Affordable Care Act, yes, for now. Until you find something Until what? Until you find something What's better? Speaker 4: You tell me. Speaker 3: What are you doing Speaker 2: about Brother, if you have solutions, wanna work with you on that. We can actually help fix mental health issues. We can work on that. We can work Speaker 4: on that. Beautiful. This is a beautiful thing. We work with you to start by calling people Nazis. Look at this. Speaker 2: She called me a Nazi and it went Speaker 4: downhill. Your next governor. Let's let's That's actually great. Can you Speaker 0: can you Speaker 4: give a handshake? Speaker 2: Seen a black Nazi in my life. That's crazy. But okay. You wanna do it? You wanna shake hands? Speaker 4: That's incredible. Speaker 2: You know what? Speaker 4: Can I get one quick Speaker 2: thing? Teens. Speaker 4: Can you apologize to him for calling him Nazi up to his face? Speaker 3: I don't think you're a Nazi right now. Speaker 2: I promise you I'm not a Nazi at all. No. What I am, I'm a conservative. Speaker 4: Hearts and minds, man. Hearts and minds. Hearts and and minds. Incredible.

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@bennyjohnson @ByronDonalds @ErikaDonalds @ForgiatoBlow47 We know who the true Fascists are! https://t.co/IeNP2a8j1Q

Saved - April 20, 2025 at 4:54 PM

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@Time4SumAxShun @StephenM @POTUS They entered our country without due process! Why do they deserve due process for us to return them? Nobody stopped Biden from bringing 15 Million Illegals into OUR country without passports, vetting, or any legitimacy. https://t.co/HD7mKuVfuo

Saved - April 11, 2025 at 11:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk expressed a negative sentiment. In response, a user accused Democrats, specifically Schumer, of inciting violence against Republicans and labeled them as hateful fascists, drawing a comparison to Hitler's Brownshirts.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Terrible

@amuse - @amuse

TERROR: Senator Schumer refused to criticize attacks on Tesla stores, employees, and customers; but willingly criticized Musk for cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from government. https://t.co/KWDVAsb2K0

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks the senator his opinion on violence against Tesla products. The speaker asks if the senator denounces the violence against Tesla products, dealerships, and cars. The senator responds that he can't talk about Tesla, but that Elon Musk is a disaster for America, and America knows it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator, what's your opinion of the, violence against Tesla, their products? What are your thoughts on that? Do you denounce the violence against Tesla products and dealerships and cars in the streets? Speaker 1: I can't talk about Tesla, but Elon Musk is a disaster for America, and America knows it. Look at Wisconsin. Speaker 0: Thank you, senator.

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@elonmusk CRIMINAL! Listen to Democrat Schumer INCITE VIOLENCE threatening Republicans to change their vote or 'face consequences'... Democrats are Hateful Fascist NAZI's! JUST LIKE HITLER'S BROWNSHIRTS! https://t.co/wuE0vMCOTc

@saras76 - Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹

.@chuckschumer is inciting violence: "We are mobilizing in NY. We have people going to the Republican districts, going after Republicans who vote for this & forcing them to change their vote or face consequences." @FBIDirectorKash @PamBondi @FBIDDBongino https://t.co/Qj59yniWuQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they are mobilizing in New York, targeting Republican districts and Republicans who are voting in a way the speaker opposes. The goal is to force these Republicans to change their vote or face consequences. The speaker characterizes this as a long, relentless, daily fight. The speaker is confident that they will bring down Trump's popularity, numbers, and strength if they persist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are we are mobilizing in New York. We have people going to the Republican districts and going aft going after these Republicans who are voting for this and forcing them to either face change their vote or face the consequences. This is a long, relentless fight that we fight every day. And I am confident that we will bring Trump's popularity, numbers, and strength down if we keep at it and keep at it and keep at it.
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 4:19 PM

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@elonmusk https://t.co/kb6mYLogtw

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 9:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A conversation began with the announcement that the European Union failed to secure funding or rearmament for Ukraine during an emergency meeting. One participant expressed amusement at this outcome, suggesting that Ukraine's President Zelensky would now seek support from Trump after being dismissed from the White House. Another participant questioned why the U.S. covers 70% of NATO's defense funding while facing significant domestic issues and a large deficit, arguing that European nations should take more responsibility for their own defense.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: The European Union has FAILED to reach a deal for Ukraine, as “emergency meeting” ends with NO funding or rearmament, per NYPost This was so predictable 🤣 Zelensky fled to the UK after being booted out of the White House by Trump hoping the EU would bail him out, but it turns out Europe is BROKE because of their self-created migrant crisis. Now Zelensky will come crawling back to Trump. Who could’ve POSSIBLY seen this coming? 😂

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@nicksortor Why does America pay for now rich Europe’s Defense funding a majority 70% of NATO? With America’s huge Government deficits, many vital domestic issues to address, and $250 Billion to Ukraine… It’s far Past Time for European nations stand up for themselves! https://t.co/OnVZDZfbgO

Saved - March 1, 2025 at 2:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers around Justin Trudeau's potential successor, Mark Carney, who emphasizes the need to achieve Net Zero to stabilize the climate. In response, another participant references Dr. Patrick Moore, an early Greenpeace figure, who claims there is no definitive scientific proof linking CO2 to the slight warming observed over the past 300 years. They suggest watching a video that conveys this message.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Justin Trudeau's potential replacement, ex-central banker Mark Carney: "We can't stabilise the climate unless we get to Net Zero." 🤡 https://t.co/79QWacNoLc

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's scrutiny and healthy skepticism around ESG and sustainable labels, which is actually a good thing. It's why we're so focused on net zero. Stabilizing the climate requires us to reach net zero; it's that simple. We're dealing with hard numbers: emissions either increase or decrease. If they're decreasing, are they doing so at a rate consistent with scientific targets? Our approach is rooted in the same science used by the UN and others for the 1.5-degree objectives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. There is some stress, and it's great that there is that it's not great that it happens, but it's great that there's that scrutiny, and there's that skepticism or healthy skepticism about ESG labels or sustainable labels. And it, again, is one of the reasons we're having this ruthless, relentless focus on net zero because in the end, look, we can't stabilize the climate unless we get to net zero. And it's as simple. These are hard numbers. Your emissions are either a or b. They're going up or down. And if they're going down, are they going down consistent with the science? We anchor it in the science, the same science the UN and others use for the one and half degree objectives.

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@wideawake_media Greenpeace early principle, Dr. Patrick Moore: "There is no definitive scientific proof that CO2 is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the last 300 years.” Watch this video for important message https://t.co/M8wRYUByma

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@catturd2 Greenpeace early principle, Dr. Patrick Moore: "There is no definitive scientific proof that CO2 is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the last 300 years.” Watch this video for important message: https://t.co/ze61ilKKBx

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have stated publicly that there's no definitive scientific proof, through real-world observation, that carbon dioxide is responsible for the slight warming of the global climate over the last three hundred years. If such proof existed through testing and replication, it would be documented for everyone to see. The idea that human emissions are the dominant influence on climate is just a hypothesis, not a universally accepted scientific theory. Therefore, skepticism is warranted when people claim the science is settled. However, it is certain that CO2 is essential for all life on Earth, and without enough of it in the atmosphere, the planet would be dead. Yet, our children are taught that CO2 is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As I've stated publicly on many occasions, there is no definitive scientific proof through real world observation that carbon dioxide is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the last three hundred years since the peak of the little ice age. If there were such a proof, through testing and replication, it would have been written down for all of us to see. The contention that human emissions are now the dominant influence on climate is simply a hypothesis rather than a universally accepted scientific theory. It is therefore correct, indeed, verging on the compulsory in the scientific tradition, to be skeptical of those who express certainty that the science is settled and the debate is over. But there is certainty beyond a reasonable doubt that CO two is the building block for all life on earth and that without its presence in the global atmosphere at sufficient concentration, this would be a dead planet. Yet today, our children and our publics are taught that c o two is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilization to its knees.
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 2:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation began with a comment on Justin Trudeau's potential replacement, Mark Carney, emphasizing the need to achieve Net Zero to stabilize the climate. In response, another participant argued that CO2, which constitutes only 0.04% of the atmosphere, does not cause global warming. They claimed that the Earth's warming is a result of recovery from a mini-ice age 300 years ago and stated that correlation does not imply causation, labeling concerns about man-made climate change as a costly misconception.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Justin Trudeau's potential replacement, ex-central banker Mark Carney: "We can't stabilise the climate unless we get to Net Zero." 🤡 https://t.co/79QWacNoLc

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's good that environmental, social, and governance (ESG) labels face scrutiny. This skepticism drives our intense focus on achieving net zero emissions. Ultimately, stabilizing the climate requires reaching net zero; it's that simple. Emissions either increase or decrease. The key question is whether they are decreasing at a rate consistent with scientific targets. Our approach is grounded in the same scientific principles used by the UN and others, specifically targeting the 1.5-degree objective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. There is some stress, and it's great that there is that it's not great that it happens, but it's great that there's that scrutiny, and there's that skepticism or healthy skepticism about ESG labels or sustainable labels. And it, again, is one of the reasons we're having this ruthless, relentless focus on net zero because in the end, look, we can't stabilize the climate unless we get to net zero. And it's as simple. These are hard numbers. Your emissions are either a or b. They're going up or down. And if they're going down, are they going down consistent with the science? We anchor it in the science, the same science the UN and others use for the one and half degree objectives.

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@wideawake_media Science Truth: CO2 is not causing Global Warming -it makes up very tiny 0.04% of Earth's atmosphere creating no blanket effect. Our Earth is heating up from the mini-ice age 300 years ago. Correlation does not always mean causation. False Man-made Climate Change waste $Trillions! https://t.co/C1nMlqol3o

Saved - February 24, 2025 at 1:45 PM

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@DiedSuddenly_ The COVID VAX is Noneffective Poison! Ruining immune systems w/mRNA gene therapy so-called “vaccine" causes myocarditis, cancers, diabetes & others. Experimental mRNA is the largest medical HOAX in history! Millions of people died or permanently damaged. https://t.co/FKZE78J3yY

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

THE VACCINE IS KILLING PEOPLE: "I'm gonna be very clear about this and I recently just testified in the U.S. Senate, December 7th 2022. The Vaccine is Killing people and it's killing large numbers of people." Credible Estimate of 17 million global deaths from the Covid Vaccines.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently testified in the US Senate on December 7th, 2022. I want to be very clear: the vaccine is killing people, and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality for a medicinal product causing death. As of December 23rd, 2022, the CDC has recorded over sixteen thousand Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine, and that's probably a gross underreport. I was recently at a conference in Romania on the COVID crisis. There was a lot of work trying to unpack what we actually understand, and I saw a credible estimate of something like seventeen million deaths globally from this technology. When you scale up to billions, it's not hard to reach a number like that with a technology this dangerous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm gonna be very clear about this, and I've recently just testified in the US Senate December seventh twenty twenty two. The vaccine is killing people, and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality for a medicinal product causing death. Our CDC, as of 12/23/2022, has over sixteen thousand Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine. And that's probably a gross underreport. Speaker 1: Yep. There was a press I was recently at a conference, in Romania on the COVID crisis, And so there was a lot of work trying to unpack what we actually understand, and I saw a credible estimate of something like seventeen million deaths globally from this technology. Speaker 0: Seventeen million deaths from the COVID vax? Speaker 1: Well, when, you know, when you scale up to billions, it's not hard to reach a number like that with a technology this dangerous.
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 7:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Liz Churchill criticized Pfizer for promoting their cancer-fighting efforts in a Super Bowl commercial, claiming the company has harmed people with an experimental COVID vaccine linked to cancer. She called for their arrest. wdunlap responded with a link.

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Pfizer is saying they’re going to ‘fight cancer’ in their Super Bowl Commercial after YEARS of poisoning people with an ‘Experimental Covid Vaccine’ that caused cancer. ARREST THEM. https://t.co/oMyPMiResj

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@liz_churchill10 https://t.co/EC7dr48hv2

Saved - April 10, 2024 at 12:54 PM

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@POTUS Americans are POORER under Biden! REAL WAGES HAVE FALLEN! Food prices are up 33.7%, Energy up 32.8%, Electricity up 27.1%, Housing up 18.7% Costing the average family an extra $11,000+ per year! (Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics) Bidenomics is a Huge Failure! https://t.co/KjbGIVpOsH

Saved - August 11, 2023 at 3:50 PM

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

This is what is destroying humans' hearts & people are dying suddenly. These untested & not effective experimental mRNA so-called vaccines are the largest medical HOAX in history! Millions of people have &will die or be permanently damaged because of them.

mRNA Vaccines Injure the Heart of ALL Vaccine Recipients and Cause Myocarditis in Up to 1 in 27, Study Finds – The Daily Sceptic New evidence has emerged from Switzerland showing that mRNA vaccines are routinely injuring the heart of vaccine recipients, with myocarditis occurring in as many as one in 27 cases. dailysceptic.org
Saved - July 30, 2023 at 11:23 PM

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

WE WERE WARNED!… There are serious health issues involved with modern vaccines! Bill Gates’ Moderna COVID-19 vaccine induced adverse reactions in 'more than half' of trial participants.

Moderna COVID-19 vaccine induced adverse reactions in 'more than half' of trial participants One-fifth of participants in one test group reported 'one or more severe adverse events.' justthenews.com
Saved - June 15, 2023 at 3:49 AM

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

Why was Adam Schiff chair of the House Intel Committee? He lied to the American people about collusion. He lied to American people about Michael Flynn. He lied to American people about Ukraine. He is STILL lying about all of it. He should be censured and removed!

View Full Interactive Feed