reSee.it

Token #43441

Subscribe To The Free @reSeeIt Newsletter

reSee.it

Token #43441

Subscribe To The Free @reSeeIt Newsletter

reSee.it AI Summary
There is a false claim that DEI proponents, including @mcuban, make, stating that there is "zero evidence" that DEI involves selecting "less qualified candidates." However, evidence from Affirmative Action cases suggests that DEI does indeed give preference to less qualified candidates based on their group identity. The question that needs to be answered is why an individual's chances of obtaining a position should be influenced by their group identity. It remains to be seen whether @mcuban and others will address this question directly or continue to evade it.
𝕏 Post Text

@TheRabbitHole84 - The Rabbit Hole

The false claim that @mcuban and other demographic engineers in the DEI cabal pedal is that there is "zero evidence" that DEI entails selecting "less qualified candidates." They say this despite the extensive evidence that exists from Affirmative Action cases that indicates that DEI does, in fact, mean less qualified candidates get a leg up on the basis of their group identity while others are effectively handicapped. The question that these people owe us an answer to is a simple one: Why should an individual have a better or worse chance of obtaining a position on the basis of their group identity? I suspect they will continue to dodge answering this question directly and instead continue to obfuscate the issue to their followers. That said, if Cuban and others are genuinely unaware and change their stance after seeing the data then they will have my respect. The ball is in your court @mcuban