A former Pharma insider reveals that the true purpose of pharma ads on TV is not to sell drugs, but to buy off the news media. This is considered an "open secret" within the industry. The ads are a PR lobbying tactic to influence the news and prevent investigations into pharma. The media acts as a referee, labeling anyone who questions vaccines as "anti-science." The two largest vaccine makers, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck, have settled criminal penalties for bribing doctors and misleading research. This revelation is described as very dark.
𝕏 Post Text
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Holy smokes. Suspicions confirmed.
Former Pharma insider tells Tucker Carlson that the true goal of pharma ads on TV is not to sell drugs but to BUY OFF the news media.
This is described as an "open secret" within the pharmaceutical industry.
TUCKER: You're saying that pharma buys TV spots not to convince people to ask for specific drugs from their physicians, but to subvert the news business?
CALLEY MEANS: This is an open secret working for pharma.
TUCKER: I never thought of that.
CALLEY MEANS: This is an open secret working for pharma. This is an open secret. The kind of silly ads you see between the news breaks, the points of that is not — it's largely to impact the customer. But the pharma has already got that. They've already bought off the doctors. They're good on that.
No, this is an open secret. The news ad spending from pharma is a public relations lobbying tactic, essentially to buy off the news. They're not investigating pharma. The news has become basically a referee. That you are a terrible anti-science luddite for asking why the shots that we require our kids to get, that fundamentally by their own advertising change the immune system of that child for life...
To even ask that question, the news referees that and calls you anti-science. When the two largest vaccine makers in the country are literally criminal enterprises, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck, in the past five years, have settled two of the largest criminal penalties in American corporate history for bribing doctors and creating misleading research for the two largest vaccine makers. So you literally have the media playing referee that you can't even ask a question.
TUCKER: If you have a vaccine injury and many people have, including some I know very well, even a profound vaccine injury, you're not allowed to complain about it.
CALLEY MEANS: No, you're "anti-science."
TUCKER: Even if it can be shown to us that this is a vaccine injury?
CALLEY MEANS: The media plays referee because they're funded by so, on all levels.
TUCKER: This is very dark, Calley Means.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pharmaceutical companies buy TV ads not to influence people to ask for specific drugs, but to manipulate the news industry. The ads are a tactic to buy off the news and prevent them from investigating the pharmaceutical industry. The news acts as a referee, labeling anyone who questions vaccine safety as anti-science, while the two largest vaccine makers have been involved in criminal activities. People who have experienced vaccine injuries are silenced and labeled as anti-science. The media is funded by pharmaceutical companies at all levels, creating a dark reality. The speaker believes it is empowering to recognize this and calls for a shift away from trusting pharmaceutical companies, especially considering the massive government funding they receive.
Speaker 0: But you're saying that that pharma buys TV spots not to convince people to ask for specific drugs from their physicians, but to subvert the news business?
Speaker 1: This is a this is an open secret working for pharma. I never even thought of that. This is an open secret. The the the kind of silly ads you see between the news breaks. The points of that is not it's marginally to impact the customer, but but the the pharma's already got that.
They've already bought off the doctors. The the they're they're good on that. No. No. This is an open secret.
The news ad spending from pharma is a public relation lobbying tactic, essentially, to buy off the news. The the news is a refer they're not investigating pharma. There's a Oh, I've noticed. The the news has become the news has become basically a referee That you were a terrible, anti science Luddite for asking why, You know, the the shots that we require our kids to get that fundamentally, by their own advertising, change, the immune system of that child for life, why it's gone from 20 to 70. To even ask that question, the news referees that and calls you anti science when the 2 largest vaccine makers in the country Are literally criminal enterprises.
Blacksmith, Klein and Merck, in the past 5 years has settled 2 of the largest criminal penalties in American corporate history For bribing and misleading, bribing doctors and misleading, creating misleading research who who may who are the 2 largest vaccine makers. So you literally have the media playing referee that you can't even ask a question. Parent is actually
Speaker 0: If you have a vaccine injury, and many people have, including some I know very well, even a profound vaccine injury. You're not allowed to complain about it.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. You're anti you're anti science.
Speaker 0: Even if it can be shown, it was if this is a vaccine in the
Speaker 1: The media the media plays referee because they're funded. But so so so in all levels. Right? Wow. On all levels.
That's pretty dark, Cali, means. Well well, I think it's hopefully empowering. I I I think this is why we have an opportunity here, Tucker. Like Ozempic, this is not some, like, new, like, you know, it's kind of this funny thing, like, oh, you know, it's kind of vain. I can lose weight.
This is go the reason the stocks are going up is this is gonna be a lot of government money. This is gonna be the highest funded drug from the US taxpayer in history. And we've got a society when are we gonna say, let's go another direction. Why are we trusting pharma now when they've been completely acting to to garner no trust?
