Elon Musk has stated that US politicians are receiving kickbacks from Ukraine funding, echoing Matt Gaetz's claims that the Ukraine War serves as a means to launder money. Gaetz argues that the involvement in Ukraine is excessive, especially since the Afghanistan conflict has wound down. He suggests that defense contractors are pushing for a prolonged conflict to facilitate ongoing financial transactions and unaccountable spending. The narrative emphasizes that American wars are becoming vehicles for long-term money laundering, with politicians benefiting from lobbyists and scams.
𝕏 Post Text
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
It’s official: Elon Musk says US politicians are receiving “kickbacks” from Ukraine funding
Matt Gaetz said the exact same thing. The Ukraine War is “to launder money through”
Congress reps are literally, STEALING YOUR MONEY disguised as ‘war funding’
Matt Gaetz “I think that the reason we are as involved in Ukraine as we are is because Afghanistan wound down. If we still had Afghanistan to launder money through, there probably wouldn't be the need for this type of excessive involvement in Ukraine. But I think we can look at Afghanistan and we can look at what's going on here and say, what a lot of these defense contractors are pushing toward is how to have an extended kind of low yield war.
Like if there's a way to stretch this thing out, turn it into a 20, 30 year kind of thing where there's a whole lot of money moving around and unaccountable pots and a lot of weapons getting bought and then all man the stockpiles well we got to spend more money to reload those”
American Wars are looking for Longterm Unaccountable Money Laundering
US Politicians take their kickbacks from their lobbyist and through scams like FTX to keep the taxpayer money laundering going
Video Transcript AI Summary
The heavy involvement in Ukraine is likely due to the end of the Afghanistan war. If Afghanistan were still ongoing, the need for such extensive involvement in Ukraine might not exist. Many defense contractors seem to be pushing for extended, low-yield wars. The goal appears to be stretching conflicts out for twenty to thirty years to keep money flowing through unaccountable sources. This approach involves purchasing weapons, depleting stockpiles, and then requesting more funds to replenish them, creating a cycle of continuous spending.
Speaker 0: I think that the reason we are as involved in Ukraine as we are is because Afghanistan wound down. And if we still had Afghanistan to launder money through, there probably wouldn't be the need for this type of excessive involvement in Ukraine. But I think we can look at Afghanistan and we can look at what's going on here and say, what a lot of these defense contractors are pushing toward is how to have an extended low yield war. Like if there's a way to stretch this thing out, turn it into a twenty, thirty year kind of thing where there's a whole lot of money moving around and unaccountable pots and a lot of weapons getting bought and then, oh man, the stockpiles, well we got to spend more money to reload those.
