TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Posted - June 10, 2023 at 12:18 PM

Saved - June 10, 2023 at 9:58 PM

@Ray_P45 - Ray Pritchett

America is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. America today is the largest criminal empire and money laundering operation on the face of the earth. https://conservativeroof.com/just-in-pentagon-prepares-to-deliver-brand-new-2-billion-military-aid-package-for-ukraine/

[BREAKING NEWS] Jaw-Dropping — Pentagon Prepares to Deliver Brand New... WOW! conservativeroof.com

@ImMeme0 — I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

Posted - July 11, 2023 at 3:09 PM

Saved - July 12, 2023 at 3:06 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The US war in Ukraine reveals shocking corruption. Max Blumenthal exposes the truth at the UN Security Council. American taxpayers are unaware of where their money goes. Startling payments include $45M to Kyiv government from Social Security Administration and $45B from US Agency for National Development to settle Ukraine's debt, much of which is owned by Black Rock.

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

If this video won’t make you pissed off, I don’t know what will? Max Blumenthal shares irrefutable facts and summaries the US corruption of the war in Ukraine at the UN Security Council: “The American public has no idea where their tax money is going… We found among many bizarre payments $4.5 Million US Social Security Administration payment to the Kyiv government. We found $4.5 Billion worth of payments from the US Agency for the National Development to pay off Ukraine sovereign debt much which is owned by the global investment firm Black Rock…”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Max Blumenthal, a journalist and American taxpayer, criticizes the US government's funding of the proxy war in Ukraine. He highlights the lack of transparency and accountability in how US tax dollars are allocated to Ukraine, with funds being misused and embezzled. Blumenthal also questions the US's escalation of the conflict and the potential nuclear consequences. He criticizes the erosion of democracy in Ukraine and the profit-seeking motives of individuals and companies involved in the war. Blumenthal calls on the UN Security Council to enforce the UN Charter and monitor and restrain NATO's actions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I now give the floor to mister Max Blumenthal. Thank you, and I thank, Alex Rubinstein and Wyatt Reed for helping me prepare this address. Wyatt Reed is a journalistic colleague of mine who, in October 2022, happened to be in Donetsk when his hotel was shelled by the Ukrainian military with a apparently US made howitzer nearly killing him, he was a 100 meters away. I'm also here with my friend, the civil rights activist, Randy Kredico, who has more recently in Donetsk, can witness regular HIMARS attacks on civilian targets. I am here not only as a journalist who has spent over 20 years writing books, doing producing documentaries and writing articles about conflict and politics from several continents. I'm also here as an American taxpayer who's been dragooned into funding a proxy war that has become a threat to the regional and international stability at the expense of My Countrymen and Women, this June this June 28, as emergency crews worked to clean up yet another toxic train derailment in the United states, this time on the Montana River, further exposing our nation's chronically underfunded infrastructure and its threats to our health. The Pentagon announced plans to send an additional $500,000,000 worth of military aid to Ukraine. The development came as Ukraine's army enters the 3rd week of a vaunted counter that CNN describes as, quote, not meeting expectations, and which even Volodymyr Zelensky says is going slower than desired. As Ukraine's military failed to breach Russia's primary defense line, CNN reported on June 12th that Kyiv had lost, quote, lost 16 U. S.-made armored vehicles sent to the country. So what did the Pentagon do? It simply passed that bill down to average U. S. Taxpayers, like myself, charging us another 325,000,000 to replace Ukraine's squandered military stock. There was zero effort to consult the U. S. Public's position on the matter, and the vast majority of Americans likely did not even know the exchange took place. This policy that I'm describing to you, which sees Washington prioritize unrestrained funding for a proxy war with a nuclear power in a foreign land where our while our domestic infrastructure falls apart before our eyes, exposes a disturbing dynamic at the heart of the Ukraine conflict. An international Ponzi scheme that enables Western elites to seize hard earned wealth from the hands of average U. S. Citizens and funnel it into the coffers of a foreign government that even Transparency International ranks as consistently one of the most corrupt in Europe. The US government has yet to conduct an official audit of its funding for Ukraine. The American public has no idea where their tax dollars are going, and that's why this week, we at the Gray Zone published an independent audit of U. S. Tax tax dollar allocation to Ukraine throughout the fiscal years 2022 and 'twenty three. Our investigation was led by Heather Kaiser, a former military intelligence officer who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. We found, among many bizarre payments, a 4 a $4,500,000 payment from the US Social Security Administration to the Kyiv government. We found $4,500,000,000 worth of payments from the US Agency For International Development to pay off Ukraine's sovereign debt, much of what is which is owned by the global investment firm BlackRock, that amounts to $30 taken from every U. S. Citizen at a time when 4 in 10 Americans cannot afford a $400 emergency, we found tax dollars earmarked for Ukraine patting the budgets of a television station in Toronto, a pro NATO think tank in Poland, and believe it or not, even rural farmers in Kenya. We found tens of millions to private equity firms, including 1 in the Republic of Georgia, as well as a $1,000,000 payment to a single private entrepreneur in Kyiv. Our audit also revealed the Pentagon's $4,500,000 contract with a company called Atlantic Diving Supply to provide Ukraine with unspecified explosives equipment. This is a notoriously corrupt company that none other than Tom Tillis, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, previously lambasted for its, quote, history of fraud. Once again, Congress has failed to ensure these shady payments and massive arms deals are properly tracked. In fact, much of the military and humanitarian aid shipped to Ukraine has simply vanished. Last year, CBS News quoted the director of a pro Zelensky nonprofit in Ukraine who reported that only 30% of aid was reaching the front lines. The embezzlement of funds and supplies is at least as troubling as the potential consequences of the illicit transfer and sales of military grade weapons. Last June, the head of Interpol warned that the massive transfers of arms into Ukraine means, quote, we can expect an influx of weapons in Europe and beyond, and that criminals are now, as we speak, focusing on them. This May, a group of anti Kremlin Russian exiles, outfitted with gear supplied by the Ukrainian government, was hailed bi Western politicians for carrying out terrorist attacks in Russian territory using American made Humvees. Although the group, the so called Russian volunteer corps led by a man who calls himself the, quote, white king and includes numerous open admirers of Adolf Hitler. Described as Neo Nazis in U. S. Mainstream media, the Western weaponization of this militia against Russian forces and Russian civilians has not prompted any outcry from Congress. And while the Biden administration has promised that it's keeping tabs on the weapons sent, a State Department cable leaked last December conceded that, quote, kinetic activity and active combat between Ukrainian and Russian forces create an environment in which standard verification measures are sometimes impracticable or impossible. The Biden administration not only knows that it cannot track the weapons it's shipping to Ukraine, it knows that it is escalating a proxy war against the world's largest nuclear power and daring it to respond in kind. We know this because back in 2014, and this time line is so important, that's when NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that the war started following a U. S.-backed coup d'etat, President Barack Obama rejected demands from Kyiv to send lethal offensive weaponry because as the Wall Street Journal put it, he had a, quote, longstanding concern that arming Ukraine would provoke Moscow into further escalation that would drag Washington into to a proxy war. When Donald Trump entered office in 2017, he attempted to hold the line on Barack Obama's policy, but was soon branded a Russian puppet by the Beltway press corps and the Democratic Party for refusing to send Raytheon's Javelin missiles to the Ukrainian military. His reluctance to send the javelins became a central theme of his impeachment, and he predictably relented as US made offensive weaponry began to reach the front lines of the Donbas. The collective west exploited the Minsk Accords to, quote, give Ukraine time to arm up, as the former German chancellor, Angela Merkel put it. In January 2022, the US announced a $200,000,000 arms package to Ukraine. Follow the timeline. By the 18th February, observers from the Organization For Security and Cooperation in Europe reported a doubling in ceasefire violations with OSCE maps showing the overwhelming majority of targeted sites on the side of pro Russian separatists in Donetsk and Lugansk. 5 days later, Russia invaded Ukraine. And since then, the US and its allies have have been scurrying up the escalation ladder at every opportunity. Quote, things we couldn't give in January because it was escalatory were given in February, a former state department official complained after meeting with Ukrainian counterparts. And things we couldn't give in February, we can in April. That has been the distinct pattern, starting with, for crying out loud, stingers, referring to shoulder mounted rockets. Joe Biden himself said in March 2022, the idea that we're going to send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks, don't kid yourself, no matter what you all say, that's called World War III. Just over a year later, Biden changed his tune backing a plan to provide F-sixteen fighter jets to Ukraine, and after pressuring Germany to send in the tanks he once feared would provoke World War 3. It'll only take 2 months from the time Ukraine received HIMARS Lockheed made HIMARS systems for the US for the for the Ukrainian military to begin targeting critical infrastructure, using them to strike the Antonovsky Bridge over the Dnieper River, and again, 2 months later in a test strike on the Khakhovka Dam to see if the Dnieper's water could be raised enough to stymie Russian crossings as The Washington Post reported. 3 weeks ago, the Khakhovka Dam was destroyed, triggering a major environmental catastrophe that caused mass flooding and contamination of the local water why, Ukraine, of course, blames Russia for this attack, but has produced no evidence. Around this time, Ukraine also baselessly accused Russia of planning a provocation at the Zaporozhzhia nuclear plant. This triggered a resolution by senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal, no relation to me, calling for NATO to intervene directly in Ukraine and attack Russia if such an incident occurred. The move by Blumenthal and Graham thus established a de facto red line for initiating US military action, much like the one set down in Syria, which as a former US diplomat commented to journalist Charles Glass, was an open invitation to a false flag, will we see another Duma deception, but this time in Zaporozhia? This time with nuclear consequences? Why are we doing this? Why are we tempting nuclear annihilation by flooding Ukraine with advanced weapons and sabotaging negotiations at every turn? We've been told by people people like senator Dick Durbin that Ukraine is literally in a battle for freedom and democracy itself. And therefore, anyone who opposes military aid to Ukraine opposes the very defensive democracy according to this logic. So where's the democracy in Vladimir Zelensky's decision to ban opposition parties, to criminalize the media outlets his legitimate political opponents to jail his top political rival and his deputies, to raid orthodox churches and jail clergymen. Where is the democracy in the Ukrainian government's imprisonment of Gonzalo Lyra, an American citizen simply for challenging the official narrative of Ukraine's war. And where is the democracy in Zelensky's recent decision to suspend elections in 2024 on the grounds that martial law has been declared? The answer is that Ukrainian democracy is harder to find these days than that country's commander in chief, Valerie Zaluzhny. Senator Lindsey Graham has offered a much more grim and more on the mark rationale for supplying Ukraine with 1,000,000,000 in weapons. As the senator boasted during a recent visit with Zelensky in Kyiv, the Russians are dying. It's the best money we've ever spent. I repeat, the Russians are dying. It's the best money we've ever spent. And Graham has also said that Americans are ready to fight this war down to the last Ukrainian. While official casualty numbers are strictly classified, we must worry that Ukraine is well on its way to fulfilling the senator's ghoulish fantasies. As a Ukrainian soldier complained this month to Vice News, we don't know what Zelenskyy's plans are, but, quote, it looks like the extermination of its own population, like of the combat ready and working age population. That's it. Indeed, military cemeteries in Ukraine are expanding almost as rapidly as the Northern Virginia McMansions and beachfront estates of executives from Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and assorted Beltway contractors benefiting from the 2nd highest level of military spending since World War 2, these are the real winners of the Ukraine proxy war. Not average Ukrainians or Americans or Russians. The winners oral Europeans for that matter. The winners are people like secretary of state, Tony Blinken, who spent his time between the Obama and Biden administrations launching a consulting firm called Westec Exec Advisors, which secured lucrative government contracts for intelligence firms in the arms industry. Blinken's former partners at WestExec include Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, CIA Deputy Director David Cohen, former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, and almost a dozen current and former members of Biden's national security team. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin for his part as a former and possibly future member of board member of Raytheon, and an ex partner of Pine Island Capital Investment, which collaborates with WestExec and which Blinken himself has advised. Meanwhile, the current US ambassador to this body, the UN, Linda Thomas Greenfield is listed as a senior counsel at the Albright Stonebridge Group, a self described commercial diplomacy firm that also finesses government contracts for the intelligence and arms sector, and which was founded by Madeleine Albright, infamously known for her comments that the deaths by sanctions of half a 1000000 Iraqi children were worth it. So while military age Ukrainian men are ripped off the streets by military police and sent to the front lines, the financially and politically connected architects of this proxy war our planning to walk through the revolving door to reap unimaginable profits once their time in the Biden administration is over. For them, a negotiated settlement to this territorial dispute means an end to the cash cow of close to 150,000,000,000 in US aid to Ukraine. So in closing, when the United States, my country, a permanent member of this council, has fallen under the control of a bipartisan regime which seeks to perpetuate a proxy war for as long as it takes, in the words of Joe Biden, which considers diplomacy synonymous with unilateral course of measures to, quote, turn the ruble to rubble, as Biden pledged to do, whose leadership subverts negotiations in order to pursue profit while refusing to properly its inform its own citizens what they're paying for and pushes the sons and brothers of its supposed Ukrainian partners out onto a killing field in order to bludgeon a geopolitical rival. When both Zelensky and members of US Congress are calling for preemptive strikes on Russia, which have nothing to do with article 51 of the UN Charter, this counsel must take action to enforce that charter. That charter is clear that the Security Council must use its authority to guarantee a specific settlement of dispute, particularly when it threatens international security, that should not only apply to Russia and Ukraine, this council has an obligation to strictly monitor and restrain the US the illegal military formation known as NATO.

@SheilaG2024 — SheilaG2024

Posted - July 30, 2023 at 10:14 PM

Saved - July 31, 2023 at 2:23 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

John Kirby's statements should be questioned, considering the laws in Ukraine and Russia that restrict journalists from criticizing their governments. The US, led by a corrupt president, is involved in a war that doesn't benefit the country. News from Ukrainian and Russian agencies cannot be trusted, leaving us uncertain about the situation in Ukraine. Our corrupt Congress, President, and military are funneling taxpayer money to a corrupt country. Our defense leaders have made our military weak, supporting Ukraine's corrupt leader. American, Ukrainian, and Russian citizens suffer while our money is funneled back to Congress as illegal kickbacks. Corruption exists across all parties in our government. The majority of Congress is corrupt, prioritizing personal gain over the people. Our politicians should work on bills to prevent government employees from affiliating with certain organizations and to protect our privacy from government-controlled digital currency. We must raise our voices and take action before it's too late. Losing the election or the implementation of CBDC would be disastrous. Time is running out.

@SheilaG2024 - SheilaG2024

Do you believe the shit John Kirby @PentagonPresSec is spewing? Everyone needs to keep in mind that both the Ukraine and Russia has enacted a law that prohibits journalists from speaking anything against their respective government - both the Ukraine and Russia. Then we can also add this dirtbag John Kirby to the same category. The facts are simple: 1. The American government led by the most corrupt President @POTUS in American history has made us one of the most corrupted governments in the world. We are in war that we really have no stakes in. How exactly does it benefit America? It doesn’t. 2. We cannot trust any news originating from Ukrainian or Russian news agencies 3. Therefore we do not know what is really happening in Ukraine because of corrupt news agencies that is serving as nothing more than the mouth piece for their respective governments 4. What we do know is our corrupt Congress, our corrupt President and our corrupt military is funneling trillions of American taxpayer dollars to one of the most corrupt countries in the world. That money does not belong to our our government — that money belongs to us. 5. Our @SecDef Lloyd Austin and our @thejointstaff are useless and has turned our military into the laughing stock of the world. They have allowed out military armaments to go dangerously low to support the useless cause of Ukraine led by another corrupt world leader @Zelenskyyuaua . 5. The only people suffering from this war are American, Ukrainian and Russian citizens. This war was manmade and by design to give our money away, allowing it to be funneled back to Congress in illegal kickbacks under the guise of foreign aid. If anyone believe it’s only Joe and family who sell favors for kickbacks then you are stupid. Corruption spans across all parties, at the highest levels in our government while we sit back and accept that crap. 2A was created as the mechanism for citizens to take back control of their country from nefarious mobsters and tyrannical rule. Why do you think nothing gets done in @SenateGOP , @HouseGOP , @SenateDems , @HouseDemocrats ? 98% of our Congress are on the take. To do anything would mean giving up a primary source of their income is why! They will do anything any lobbyist wants in exchange for $$, paid vacations, even home improvements. They will write foreign aid packages worth billions of dollars that have millions of dollars in kickbacks. Why haven’t we heard our politicians working on bills to outlaw any government employee at any level and in any position from being affiliated with or belonging to @wef Why aren’t they working on a bill to make a law that prohibits government CBDC to protect our privacy? One can only assume it’s because they support this. Why aren’t we on the street making our voices heard? Is it because it’s a trap? Is it because we might go to jail? I don’t buy that. That is an excuse from cowards. Cowards that are willing to submit. Cowards that willing to let you do the work of saving them. There are two things everyone needs to be absolutely certain if either of these two things happen and whichever happens first; 1. We lose this election or 2. CBDC becomes reality We are fucked and we lose everything and both of those are like an out of control freight train barreling down the tracks. Time is no longer on our side.

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Zelensky of Ukraine is seeking to negotiate a just peace and reclaim his country's sovereignty. The US is working with him on a 10-point formula to achieve this. Diplomatic efforts have been ongoing for months, with discussions held between national security advisors. In terms of military support, Ukraine has received everything they requested leading up to and during the counteroffensive. A recent package of assistance was provided, including F-16s and heavy armor. The US believes they have provided Ukraine with what they need to succeed in their defensive efforts.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: If and when he's ready to sit down and negotiate. Right now, his country is still under attack. He still has tens of thousands of Russian troops on his soil dug in deeply entrenched, protected by minefields on ground that doesn't belong to them. And he has every right to want to reclaim his territorial integrity and his country's sovereignty. But only President Zelensky is going to be able to determine that now. He's put hang on a second, man. He's put forward a 10 point piece formula that we are working with him and his government to help actualize, because we believe that For any diplomacy to work, it's got to start. The foundation has to be President Zelensky's view of what a just piece looks like. So he laid that out with 10 points. We're helping him actualize that. So to some degree, the work of diplomacy, the pre work of diplomacy has begun. It's begun months ago. And in fact, Jake Sullivan, the national security advisors spoke to Mr. Yermak, his equivalent in the Ukrainian government just today. And this was one of the topics that they discussed was society of a just peace and how to actualize it. Speaker 1: Zelensky, he has said he needs F-sixteen's Bakken, more heavy armor to make progress, especially because the defensive positions are so heavily mined and fortified. I mean, isn't there kind of a disconnect that if you want them to win, should they not have what they say they need? Speaker 0: They do have what they need. We have provided the Ukrainians everything they asked for in the months leading up to the counter offensive and continuing right through it. Again, Karim just walked you guys through a whole big old package yesterday. And all the stuff that's in that package It's stuff that's relevant to the

@w_terrence — Terrence K. Williams

Posted - September 20, 2023 at 10:22 PM

Saved - September 21, 2023 at 6:26 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Zelensky, Biden, and others are misusing our tax money in Ukraine. They even spend it on lavish dinners with celebrities. I'm not taking sides, but let's stop sending our hard-earned money abroad. Who agrees?

@w_terrence - Terrence K. Williams

I HATE TO BREAK THE NEWS! We are being Pimped out by Zelensky, Biden and everyone else sending Ukraine our MONEY! We work hard and they use our Taxes to launder money and Zelensky is using our money to have dinner with celebrities I’m not Pro Putin or Pro Zelensky, I’m Pro not sending our money to another country! Who’s with me

Video Transcript AI Summary

We're being pimped by Zelensky and the US government. Our hard-earned money is being sent to Ukraine, and when Zelensky gets it, he says it's not enough. We can't even afford basic necessities here, yet we're sending billions to Ukraine. Zelensky is having steak dinners with celebrities while our veterans sleep on the streets and children go hungry. It's infuriating and makes no sense. If people want Ukraine to have money, they should send their own. We need to take care of our own problems first.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Y'all, listen up. I hate to break the news, but we get pimped. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Zelensky is a PIMP. We are getting pimped around here. Okay? I'm sorry to let you know, but I'm getting pimped. You are getting pimped out. Okay? Because we working hard, paying taxes, and they are using our money To send to another country, to send to another man in a whole another country. And then when he get the money, he said it ain't enough, mother. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. What the it ain't enough. It no. It's too much, partner. Run that money back. Send us our money back. And Gillespie ain't the only one pimping around here. We getting pimped by the United States government. We getting pimped by Joe Biden. They they over here making us think that this money is helping is helping the Ukrainians and Helping Zelensky and somehow is helping us. How in the hell Is hold on. I'm I'm not it sounds so stupid. I'm trying to figure this out. So sending our money to a whole another country is somehow helping us. That don't make no sense because right now in this country, people can't even afford to buy eggs. People can't even afford to buy chicken wings. And we sending 1,000,000,000 of dollars to Ukraine? And then Zelenskyy over here having steak dinners with celebrities? We getting pimped around here. And then we got stupid excuse my stupid ass Americans They are happy are happy with with Biden sending Ukraine money. What? If you if you want Ukraine to have money, go to your bank. Okay? Withdraw all your money. Withdraw all your money. Take it all out. Cash out on your money. Okay? And then send it to Ukraine. Okay? Send them your money because they don't no. I don't want them to have mine. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. We got veterans sleep on the streets right now. We got veterans that go hungry every day. Children in America who need help. And we sending them money? And what they doing with the money? What are they doing with the money? Not a damn thing. Zelensky flying all over the damn world, having a good old time. Why is he meeting with celebrities During a war. Russia supposed to be taking your country, but you over here inviting celebrities down to Ukraine. I this is the this is the most yeah. You know what? I shouldn't get riled up like this. I shouldn't get riled up like this, but it's pissing me off because it don't make no damn sense at all.

@Resist_05 — Pelham

Posted - September 24, 2023 at 3:53 AM

Saved - September 24, 2023 at 10:53 AM

@Resist_05 - Pelham

“The goal is to use Ukraine to wash money out of the US and Europe through Ukraine and back into the hands of of a transnational elite (BlackRock). The goal is an endless war, not a successful war”…

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to utilize it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The intention is to channel this money through Afghanistan and into the hands of a transnational security organization. The ultimate goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving a specific outcome.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational our security office. That is the goal. I e, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful

@DrLoupis — Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

Posted - September 24, 2023 at 10:53 AM

Saved - September 24, 2023 at 1:02 PM

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

Julian Assange: “The goal is to use Ukraine to wash money out of the US and Europe through Ukraine and back into the hands of of a transnational elite (BlackRock). The goal is an endless war, not a successful war” @Resist_05

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker explains that the objective is not to fully control Afghanistan, but rather to utilize it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The money is then funneled back to a transnational security organization. The ultimate goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving success.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational our security office. That is the goal. I e, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful

@CultureWar2021 — Culture War Report

Posted - October 2, 2023 at 12:25 AM

Saved - October 5, 2023 at 5:25 PM

@CultureWar2021 - Culture War Report

Julian Assange... “The goal is to use Ukraine to wash money out of the US and Europe through #Ukraine and back into the hands of of a transnational elite (BlackRock)." "The goal is an endless war, not a successful war” #JulianAssange #ukraineWar

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to move money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries into the hands of a transnational security alliance. This is done by continuously engaging in war, rather than aiming for a victorious outcome.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax basis of the United States, out of the tax basis of European countries, through out of sand and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal, I e the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful

@iluminatibot — illuminatibot

Posted - October 3, 2023 at 1:37 AM

Saved - October 4, 2023 at 10:31 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

CNN admits "vast majority" of US money to Ukraine is going to American companies. War is a racket. American companies = defense contractors = military industrial complex

Video Transcript AI Summary

The majority of the money from this gain is going to American companies and jobs. American companies like Lockheed Martin, which produces tanks and supports Ukraine's counter offensive, are benefiting from this increase in demand. As a result, Lockheed Martin plans to increase its workforce in Camden, Arkansas by 20%. This demonstrates that the money is going to America.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: It's worthwhile with all of this gaining, you know, some steam and public perception to be clear on some facts. 1st and foremost, the vast majority of this money is going to American companies and jobs, right? Because those are the people who are making the Abrams tanks, the and all and everything else. When you take Lockheed Martin, which makes behind bars and has been core to Ukraine's counter offensive, the company announced it's going to increase its workforce in Camden, Arkansas by 20% just because of this new demand. That is going to America.

@nataliegwinters — Natalie Winters

Posted - October 3, 2023 at 12:36 PM

Saved - February 12, 2024 at 10:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Former Democrat Congressman Jim Moran has become a lobbyist and recently signed a $25,000/month agreement with the Ukrainian government. The funds for this agreement are said to come from a Ukrainian non-profit called "Ukraine Freedom." This raises concerns about whether US taxpayer aid to Ukraine is being redirected to benefit DC elites.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

🚨- Former Democrat Congressman turned lobbyist Jim Moran just added the Ukrainian government as a client for $25,000/month. The letter outlining their agreement says funds will come from a virtually untraceable Ukrainian non-profit called "Ukraine Freedom." Is Ukraine aid from US taxpayers just being funneled back to DC elites?

@iluminatibot — illuminatibot

Posted - October 5, 2023 at 1:53 AM

Saved - October 5, 2023 at 3:37 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

The Ukraine war is just a massive money laundering scheme.

@drawandstrike — Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Posted - October 5, 2023 at 3:06 PM

Saved - November 30, 2023 at 6:48 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Shadow Cabal running the country puts American citizens last. They loot our resources, send wealth overseas, and engage in Forever Wars. The corruption runs deep, but slowly, the truth is being revealed. Pain wakes people up, not pleasure. The globalist elite prioritize their own agendas over America. The illusion is fading, and people are starting to see through it.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

You can't TELL PEOPLE that the Shadow Cabal that actually runs this country puts American citizens dead last, and that their real priorities are hidden from us UNTIL THEY ARE BRUTALLY REVEALED by events that overtake and derail their carefully-laid planning. You have to SHOW PEOPLE THE TRUTH. American citizens come last. DEAD LAST. You literally do not matter in their calculations. They are being FORCED to show you this. Now they same globalist people that spent 4 years screaming that Donald Trump and his supporters were ‘racists’ for getting the southern border under control and building a partial wall are talking about building a wall themselves AFTER they stupidly threw that border WIDE OPEN for the last 3 years while they stridently lied to the rest of us about having done that. Are you paying attention yet? They LOOT OUR AMERCIAN RESOURCES AND OUR AMERICAN WEALTH using their UniParty goons put into power with fake elections and they send it all over the world for their pet projects. Their new Forever Wars which are just the same old money laundering bullshit. This is the main reason Con Inc. is upset about McCarthy being ousted as House speaker. All those billions of our wealth and American treasure being sent to Ukraine is now in danger of being shut off. They are ROBBING US. This is outright THEFT. They are destroying our country and their puppets stand in front of us with frozen embarrassed smiles and shrug helplessly as they follow their orders. This is not Left vs Right. Its not even R v D. Its American citizens vs hidden robber barons who are literally bleeding us dry. You could not have told people how bad the corruption and how deep it goes back in 2017 or even 2020. Most would **not** have believed it. They had to be SHOWN how the world **really** is, not the illusion they were blinded with all their lives. Truth can be HARD to swallow. Many people who need to wake up can't take it if you try to force their eyes open too soon. They end up turning on you, fighting to protect the very system you are attempting to save them from. It had to be this way. This was the only way that didn't lead to billions dying violently and the reign of eternal darkness forever and ever. A Great Awakening that starts slow, oh so very slowly, and then builds up steam and becomes unstoppable. You can't mandate that people wake up. You can't force it. I know a lot of people don't like that, but there it is. Its true. Your feelings about it are absolutely irrelevant. You have to spend decades slowly, carefully positioning yourself and leaving nothing to chance as you prepare to try to cut all 9 heads off a Hydra at one stroke. Because this Hydra has been in charge for hundreds of years, they have immense financial and intelligence clout and control over more than 2/3rds of the world. Or at least they did until 2017. You fuck this up, you make a mistake, you commit an error, you only get 8 of the heads and not all 9, that Hydra will kill you and your entire family. These people play for keeps, for the highest stakes. You do not open the ball on these cultists until you are 100% ready to move. You believe they killed and injured and sterilized millions of people with the clot shots? You're just scratching the surface. You have no idea of the hundreds of millions of human beings this Shadow Cabal has sacrificed to their awful fake god over the past couple of hundred years. They are being exposed. And its being done slowly because it **has to be done slowly**. Whining about that is useless because nothing can change it. You only see less than half of what's really going on. Most of the fighting takes place beneath the surface. They are being forced into one reluctant admission after another over the past 3 1/2 years. 1/2

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Much of what people have come to realize about the true nature of the world, they NEVER SEE IT if Donald J. Trump had won that 2nd term in the White House. If Trump wins in 2020, everything is still fantastic! There's no Ukraine invasion, no invasion at the US southern border, inflation stays low, US is energy independent, the economy is roaring...and we'd still be living in an illusory world. Pleasure doesn't rouse people from a deep sleep. But pain will. C.S. Lewis understood this. “Pain insists upon being attended to. God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our consciences, but shouts in our pains. It is his megaphone to rouse a deaf world.” ― C.S. Lewis Stand fast and behold the mighty power of God sweeping over the world. In the end, God wins. He even wrote a book about it.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

When we use the word 'globalists' to describe the people in US federal, state and local governments who are literally looting our own country and shipping all our wealth and resources overseas, its not some stupid catchphrase that doesn't mean anything. We're telling you something important: This government bureaucratic 'elite' class does not see itself as American citizens first. They will tell you they are 'citizens of the world'. Why have they worked so hard to make the words "America First" or 'MAGA' into dirty words, like some kind of slur? Its to give them rhetorical cover **while they literally work Americans to death to steal our resources and wealth so they can use it for evil and vile globalist agendas**. Yeah, I know. 7 years ago this would've SOUNDED like a wild hairy assed conspiracy theory told at the family reunion by the crazy uncle that everybody ignores. Who probably kinda looks like Ron Paul... Their Fake News Media filter is faltering. There are glitches in The Matrix these days. PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO SEE THROUGH THE ILLUSION THAT'S BEEN USED TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM THEM AND KEEP THEM DOCILE AND COMPLACENT. And that's a beautiful thing.

@ShadowofEzra — Shadow of Ezra

Posted - November 3, 2023 at 2:14 AM

Saved - November 3, 2023 at 6:28 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Sam Bankman-Fried admitted FTX laundered Ukrainian government funds. Joe Biden's tax dollars were involved. The money was funneled through FTX. Bankman-Fried donated to both Democrats and Republicans. Democrats allegedly used the funds with Republican assistance to manipulate elections.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Sam Bankman-Fried admitted that FTX was a crypto laundromat for the Ukrainian government. Joe Biden gave our tax dollars to Ukraine. Ukraine washed the money through crypto exchange FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried then proceeded to donate that money to Democrats and Republicans. Democrats then stole elections with the help of Republicans.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 1 discusses the use of crypto for philanthropy and raising funds for the Ukrainian government. They mention that while it can be beneficial, there are also risks involved. They have seen millions of dollars go through their systems, including their own contribution to humanitarian aid in Ukraine. They emphasize the importance of a fully digital banking system in a country where there are challenges with traditional banking due to tanks outside the banks. The conversation concludes with the acknowledgement that there is not enough time to address all the questions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Last time we talked, you were talking about philanthropy and I know you set up working with the Ukrainian government, ways to use crypto to raise money for the government. I just wanted to ask you quickly because obviously they've also changed the rules, concerns about sort of spillover effects and substitution away from their currency. How how much money did you raise and what do you think about this as a tool for the governments, but also the risks associated with it too? Speaker 1: Yes, absolutely. And I think that that gets to the point that this can be a great thing for the world. I think it can also be a really messy thing. But I think that that at its core, you know, we've we've seen 1,000,000 of dollars go through, you know, the systems we've given. I I think something close to a1000000 ourselves as well, to support, you know, humanitarian aid, and growth in Ukraine. And I, you know, I think when you think about what it would take to get, you know, to get funds moved to the the government there where we do have a relationship With the Ukrainian government, for raising capital, for them using cryptocurrencies, that that runs through FTX, you know, whether it's getting money to the government or whether it's getting money, to individuals that are in need, you know, there are literally tanks outside of the banks. And this gets to, I think, one of the places where it can be really important to have a fully digital banking system. And fully digital way of handling payments. I think that's an international one that that's The core of what we've been helping to support in Ukraine. Speaker 0: Yes. I think it's a healthy conversation to be having away from some of the noise of digital assets and cryptocurrencies themselves that the work goes on beneath. Sam, great to chat to you. Come back soon, please, because I have a 1000000 more questions for you, but as always, no, not enough time.

@ShadowofEzra — Shadow of Ezra

Posted - November 8, 2023 at 6:52 PM

Saved - November 9, 2023 at 12:19 AM

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

“The goal is to use Ukraine to wash money out of the US and Europe through Ukraine and back into the hands of of a transnational elite (BlackRock). The goal is an endless war, not a successful war" - Julian Assange (The Source) https://t.co/gy9URR8lrI

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The money is then funneled back to a transnational security alliance, specifically the international security organization. In other words, the goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war rather than achieve a victorious outcome.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal, I. E, the international security on it. That is the goal. I e, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful

@therealmrbench — sonofabench

Posted - December 14, 2023 at 10:05 AM

Saved - December 14, 2023 at 9:15 PM

@therealmrbench - sonofabench

In case you were wondering how the Billions of our tax dollars are being spent in Zelenskyy Ukraine. Homeless and drug addicted in our streets, but Ukraine gets billions. And politicians get millions in kickbacks https://t.co/38otNkuCBT

Video Transcript AI Summary

The American people should be proud of their support for Ukraine. We will continue supplying Ukraine with critical weapons and equipment, including $200 million that I just approved. However, without additional funding, our ability to help Ukraine respond to urgent demands is coming to an end. We need Ukraine to fix its broken immigration system, and Congress needs to do the same at home. Holding Ukraine funding hostage to push a partisan agenda on the border is not the solution. We need real solutions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: American people, Cambian, should be incredibly proud of the part they played in supporting Ukraine's success. We'll continue to supply Ukraine with critical weapons and and equipment as long as we can, including $200,000,000 I just approved today in critical needed equipment. But without supplemental funding, We're rapidly coming to an end of our ability to help Ukraine respond to the urgent operational demands that it has. And I have repeatedly made clear from our first day in office. We also need Ukraine to make changes to fix the broken immigration system here. We also need Congress to make the changes to fix the broken immigration system here at home. Holding Ukraine funding hostage in an attempt to force through an dream republican partisan agenda on the border is not how it works. We need real solutions.

@wendyp4545 — Wendy Patterson

Posted - December 14, 2023 at 7:34 PM

Saved - December 14, 2023 at 8:41 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Janet Yellen allegedly paid Putin $18 billion for a soft "incursion" into war-torn areas of Ukraine. The intent was not to gain land, but rather to launder billions through Ukraine and give the country a new image. Elected officials may receive kickbacks from defense manufacturers, and there could be offshore accounts involved.

@wendyp4545 - Wendy Patterson

True story. Janet Yellen paid Putin $18 billion dollars to do a soft "incursion" , Joe's words, into Ukraine in the areas of Ukraine that have been at war since 2014. If you noticed, neither side is making any progress in taking any land because that wasn't the intent for Putin to cross into Ukraine. Putin crossing into Ukraine is the excuse to launder billions through Ukraine while the country gets a new makeover and by the time the farce ends they'll have new military compliments of the US taxpayer. Elected officials get kickbacks from the defense manufacturers and there are probably a few offshore accounts that receive regular deposits from Zelenskey.

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

Wake up! If Russia wanted Ukraine, it would already have Ukraine.

@ItsHambone — Hambone

Posted - February 8, 2024 at 5:30 PM

Saved - February 15, 2024 at 8:53 PM

@ItsHambone - Hambone

RFK Jr explains how money sent to Ukraine is a "Money Laundering Scheme" for BlackRock: @RobertKennedyJr #Kennedy24 https://t.co/3UvV2JBLjq

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker points out that the budget for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the US is $12 billion, while Ukraine receives 12 times that amount in one year. The speaker mentions that even after the war in Ukraine ends, the US will spend half a trillion dollars on rebuilding the country, with contracts for rebuilding being even larger than war contracts. The speaker highlights a statement made by Mitch McConnell, who suggests that the money sent to Ukraine actually goes to US military contractors, benefiting the country. The speaker implies that this reveals a money laundering scheme involving companies like Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The entire budget for EPA is $12,000,000,000, so that's all we have for the environment in this country. We're giving 12 times that to Ukraine in 1 year, and that's just the beginning because Even if the Ukraine war ended today, we'll still just spend a half a trillion there rebuilding the country. The contracts to rebuild are even bigger than the war contracts. So Mitch McConnell was asked in in March because the Republicans are supposed to be concerned about budget deficits, And he said, can we really afford a $113,000,000,000 he was at? He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to US military contractors, so it's good for our country. Oh, he just admitted Exactly what we've all been saying, that it's all just a money laundering scheme, a Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing and Lockheed. Who do you think owns every one of those countries?

@visiblesoulfire - AwakeningDivinity

@ItsHambone @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/H0egdidTCL

@visiblesoulfire - AwakeningDivinity

It's difficult to launder our tax dollars if they spend it here in the United States. As most people already know, Ukraine is one of the money laundering capitals of the world. For a whole year Democrat lawmakers stood on the house floor and demanded taxpayer money for Ukraine. The whole time Ukraine was funneling those tax dollars to FTX, who in turn donated them back to Democrat lawmakers. A recent $886 billion defense policy plan signed on 12/22/23, "includes spending plans for Ukraine." Every time they sign a bill, how much makes it's way directly back into their pockets? What say you Julian?

Video Transcript AI Summary

The objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. This money is then funneled back to a transnational security army. The intention is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving a victorious outcome.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security army. That is the goal. I e, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - May 31, 2024 at 9:15 PM

Saved - May 31, 2024 at 10:56 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

American politicians are making themselves rich by funneling taxpayers' money to defense contractors. For instance, the US government spent $47.7 billion with Lockheed Martin, which accounted for 93% of their revenue. After receiving this money, Lockheed spent over $100 million lobbying the government through gifts and trips for elected representatives. This practice is openly disclosed, and it raises concerns about the use of taxpayers' dollars. Additionally, a significant portion of the money given to defense contractors is borrowed, with interest, further benefiting those who approved the funding. This excessive spending on defense for other countries surpasses the amount allocated to all other government programs combined.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Politicians Are Getting Filthy Rich Laundering Your Money To Defense Contractors In 2023 the US Government spent $47.7 billion dollars with Lockheed Martin. “Lockheed then proceeded to spend more than a $100 million lobbying the government. Those are all in the forms of gifts, trips, and all kinds of other bullsh*t for elected representatives.” “It makes me question what the hell do our government be doing with our tax dollars?” “They funnel the money overseas, whether through direct contributions to a country or through our nation's largest weapons manufacturers who then funnel that money back to our elected leadership through lobbyists, and they make themselves rich. And the funny thing is they don't hide it. Like, they're not hiding the fact that they're doing this. I mean, they make it very fucking obvious this is what they're doing. Like, take Lockheed Martin, for example. Last year, the United States government spent $47,700,000,000 with Lockheed Martin, which insanely enough represented 93% of Lockheed Martin's revenue for the year. Without our money, they wouldn't exist. But, anyway, after the United States government gave them 47,000,000,000, Lockheed then proceeded to spend more than a $100,000,000 lobbying the government. Those are all in the forms of gifts, trips, and all kinds of other bullshit for elected representatives. Oh, and the funnest part? Nearly 80% of the money we gave to Lockheed Martin, we borrowed. So we borrowed the money with interest to give it to a government contractor who then took a nice chunk of that money and spent it on the representatives that voted to give them the money in the 1st place. And none of this is hidden. They're not deceiving anyone. This is all publicly disclosed, and that's not even counting all the smaller contracts. You know, those contracts that are given out to small contracting firms that are generally owned by friends of the congressman who push the bill to pay them. Like, bro, you have to think about the fact that last year all by itself, when we look at all discretionary spending, we spent $861,000,000,000 on defense. 80% of that on other countries' defense. And we spent around 700,000,000,000 on everything that's not defense. We spent more last year from discretionary spending on defense for other nations than we did on everything else in the US. Every other government program, whether it's science or housing or anything, all of that together was less than what we spent on the defense of other countries. So to answer your question, that's what they're doing with our money.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Our government funnels tax dollars overseas to countries and weapons manufacturers like Lockheed Martin, who then lobby back with gifts for elected officials. Last year, the US spent $47.7 billion on Lockheed, 93% of their revenue. Nearly 80% of this money was borrowed. In total, $861 billion was spent on defense, with 80% going to other countries, surpassing spending on all other US programs combined. This is all publicly disclosed, showing where our money goes.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: It makes me question what the hell do our government be doing with our tax dollars? They funnel the money overseas whether through direct contributions to a country or through our nation's largest weapons manufacturers who then funnel that money back to our elected leadership through lobbyists, and they make themselves rich. And the funny thing is they don't hide it. Like, they're not hiding the fact that they're doing this. I mean, they make it very fucking obvious this is what they're doing. Like, take Lockheed Martin for example. Last year, the United States government spent $47,700,000,000 with Lockheed Martin, which insanely enough represented 90 3% of Lockheed Martin's revenue for the year. Without our money, they wouldn't exist. But anyway, after the United States government gave them 47,000,000,000, Lockheed then proceeded to spend more than a $100,000,000 lobbying the government. Those are all in the forms of gifts, trips, and all kinds of other bullshit for elected representatives. Oh, and the funnest part, nearly 80% of the money we gave to Lockheed Martin, we borrowed. So we borrowed the money with interest to give it to a government contractor who then took a nice chunk of that money and spent it on the representatives that voted to give them the money in the first place. And none of this is hidden. They're not deceiving anyone. This is all publicly disclosed, and that's not even counting all the smaller contract. You know, those contracts that are given out to small contracting firms that are generally owned by friends of the congressman who push the bill to pay them. Like, bro, you have to think about the fact that last year, all by itself, when we look at all discretionary spending, we spent $861,000,000,000 on defense, 80% of that on other countries' defense, and we spent around 700,000,000,000 on everything that's not defense. We spent more last year from discretionary spending on defense for other nations than we did on everything else in the US, Every other government program, whether it's science or housing or anything, all of that together was less than what we spent on the defense of other countries. So to answer your question, that's what they're doing with our money.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - November 3, 2024 at 12:20 AM

Saved - November 3, 2024 at 12:29 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I recently came across an interview with a CIA agent discussing the financial support the Taliban receives from the U.S. government. He revealed that since September 2021, over $40 million in American taxpayer money is sent weekly to Afghanistan. This money goes through the Afghanistan International Bank to the Taliban-controlled central bank, run by a sanctioned individual linked to attacks on U.S. soldiers. The central bank then holds auctions for this money, involving licensed money dealers in the Hawala system.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Undecided Voters Need To See This Interview with a CIA Agent on Afghanistan, EXPOSES Kamala Harris Admin has been Sending The Taliban “$40 million+ cash every week” He Explains Exactly How They Get It: CIA Agent “The simplest way I could say it right here, right now, American taxpayer money, your tax dollars, are funding the Taliban right now” “This has been going on since September 2021 On a weekly basis, the United States, the current administration, —- has been sending $40 million, not from his own check-in account. It’s the US payers, Americans tax dollars. — Sending them $40 million cash every week that ends up in Afghanistan. And it's a very complex system. The money goes to the Afghanistan International Bank that lacks any authority to convert this dollar to Afghani, to auction it. — So this money, AIB gives it to the Taliban-controlled central bank of Afghanistan. When I say central bank, think federal reserves. So the money goes there. Now, who is in charge of Afghanistan's central bank right now? Noor Ahmad Agha, sanctioned terrorists, sanctioned by the United States for financing IED attacks against our soldiers that killed American soldiers. He runs the central bank. He gets $40 million every week. Now once the money reaches the central bank, they hold what is called a bidding and auctioning session where they invite individuals that are involved with the Hawala system, licensed money dealers. They invite them and they're they're bidding everyone bids on who wants to buy”

Video Transcript AI Summary

American taxpayer money is currently funding the Taliban, a situation that has persisted since September 2021. The U.S. administration is sending $40 million weekly in cash to Afghanistan. This money goes to the Afghanistan International Bank, which cannot convert it to Afghani or auction it. Instead, it is transferred to the Taliban-controlled Central Bank of Afghanistan, led by Nura Madoro, a sanctioned terrorist responsible for financing attacks against U.S. soldiers. The Central Bank then conducts bidding sessions where licensed money dealers participate to buy the dollars.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The simplest way I could say it right here, right now, American taxpayer money, your tax dollars, are funding the Taliban right now. And this has been going on since September 2021. On a weekly basis, the United States, the current administration, mister Joe Biden, has been sending $40,000,000, not from his own checking account. It's the US payers' Americans' tax dollars. He's sending them $40,000,000 cash every week that ends up in Afghanistan, and it's a very complex system. The money goes to the Afghanistan International Bank that lacks any authority to convert this dollar to Afghani, to auction it. Right? And so this money, AIB gives it to the Taliban controlled Central Bank of Afghanistan. When I say Central Bank, think Federal Reserves. So the money goes there. Now who is in charge of Afghanistan's Central Bank right now? Nura Madoro. Sanctioned terrorist, sanctioned by the United States for financing IED attacks against our soldiers that killed American soldiers. He runs the Central Bank. He gets $40,000,000 every week. Now once the money reaches the central bank, they hold what is called a bidding and auctioning session, where they invite, individuals that, are involved with the hawala system, licensed money dealers. They invite them, and they're they're bidding. Everyone bids on who wants to buy this dollar and for

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 6, 2025 at 1:03 AM

Saved - January 6, 2025 at 12:31 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

They’re now admitting that the $42 billion high-speed internet program funds were misused. The FCC awarded $885 million to Elon Musk’s Starlink for 642,925 homes, but after Biden revoked the contract post-Twitter acquisition, the Democrats redirected the funds to their radical agenda, costing $100,000 per home. Instead of connecting Americans, they’ve been advancing progressive policies like DEI requirements and climate change initiatives. The original intent of the funding has been overshadowed by these priorities.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

They’re now openly admitting it. The $42 billion high speed internet program money was laundered and used for programs it wasn’t intended for How they did it: The FCC awarded Elon Musk’s Starlink $885 million to serve 642,925 homes Joe Biden targeted Elon Musk, revoked the contract after buying Twitter and then Democrats turned around and made a deal that “cost $100,000 per home”, but spent the money on their radical agenda instead They are literally openly admitting the $42 billion was laundered to be used for their radical agenda, not what it was intended for “So what has happened in the process of $42 billion being allocated for Americans to get internet?” “What they've been doing so far is advancing a wishlist of progressive policy goals. They've been pushing for DEI requirements, climate change, agenda preferences for government run networks, rather than just focusing on getting people connected.” Money laundering

Video Transcript AI Summary

Biden's administration has reversed the FCC's decision on a $885 million Starlink program intended to provide internet to over 642,000 homes and businesses. Following Biden's comments about Elon Musk, the FCC withdrew the funding, leading to increased spending on penalties instead of connecting people. A recent report indicated that the current administration is spending up to $100,000 per home for broadband, compared to the $1,300 per home under the Starlink deal. Despite $42 billion allocated for internet access, there has been no progress in connecting Americans. Instead, the focus has shifted to advancing progressive policy goals, such as DEI requirements and climate initiatives, rather than prioritizing connectivity.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: To Joe Biden giving the green light to agencies to go after him. Speaker 1: Let me ask you a question. Under the Trump administration, in 2020, the FCC awarded Starlink 885,000,000 to serve 642,000 925 homes and businesses that lacked Internet. What happened to that program? Speaker 0: Well, last year, after president Biden went to the White House podium and said that Elon Musk is worth being looked in to, the FCC abruptly reversed course and yanked back that award. And now in other programs, the ones that are actually connecting people under this administration, we're spending dollars on the penalties. Senator Cruz recently had a report showing that in some cases, we're spending 100 $1,000 per home for broadband. When with that Starlink deal, it was $1300. I don't think there's any way to explain the FCC's decision, other than to go back to Joe Biden giving the green light agencies to go after him. Speaker 1: So what has happened in the process of $42,000,000,000 being allocated for Americans to get Internet? Why has that not been able why why can't Kamala Harris deliver those results? Speaker 0: Look. After 1,000 and 39 days and no Americans being connected, what they've been doing so far is advancing a wish list of progressive policy goals. They've been pushing for DEI requirements, climate change agenda, preferences for government run networks rather than just focusing on getting people connected.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 2, 2025 at 8:21 AM

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 11:08 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

LEFT: Tim Burchett says if anyone leaks where the money goes when The Pentagon fails audits, they’d be murdered RIGHT: Elon Musk says if he were to reveal the real ways Congress gets rich, its “going to get me assassinated” So expose money laundering or fraud and you get killed https://t.co/AI8irQCtWi

Video Transcript AI Summary

It's difficult to prevent corruption, even with higher salaries, because insider trading can be so lucrative. People justify taking questionable actions for their families, especially when it's legal. If you're involved in passing a bill and know how it will affect certain industries, buying stock beforehand seems logical. However, the problem goes beyond just stock portfolios; there are other, less traceable methods of wealth acquisition. Honestly, discussing these topics is dangerous. I have to be careful not to push too hard on the corruption issue because it could put my life at risk.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: To accept corrupt money. Speaker 1: Yeah. But the problem is if you paid them a lot more, they're still not gonna make as much money as they would insider trading. Speaker 0: But it's less of a forcing function. Speaker 1: Yes. It's a lot. Speaker 0: Well, live with this. Right? Like, if you say, like, somebody's got a let's say they got, like, whatever, some some kids in DC and and, like, it's expensive. It's, like, expensive place to live. They the the schools are terrible. So, like, they they need to send their kids to, like, some kind of private schooling situation. They literally cannot afford that. They cannot afford that right now. So then you get into the situation. Well, from their standpoint, well, they've got to they'll they'll say they're doing it for their family. They're doing it for their kids. Speaker 1: Well, especially if it's legal and it currently is. You gotta be silly to not do that. If you're a part of a group of people that's passing a bill, and you know this bill's gonna get passed, you know the votes are there, and you know it's gonna affect this industry and this particular manufacturer, and you can buy stock. Speaker 0: It it's more than just insider trading. Like, the insider trading stuff like, the stock portfolio stuff is quite trackable, but there's it's a lot more than insider trading. Speaker 1: The way they're acquiring wealth? Correct. And what other methods? Speaker 0: I mean, this is really gonna get me assassinated. It's like I'm I'm not lengthening my life span by explaining this stuff, to say the least. I mean, I was supposed to go back to DC. How am I gonna survive? This fucker's gonna kill me for sure. So in fact, I I I do think, like, this it's like I actually have to be careful that I don't push too hard on the corruption stuff because it's gonna get me killed.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 5, 2025 at 4:59 AM

Saved - March 6, 2025 at 12:25 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I've been looking into how both Republican and Democratic politicians are profiting from USAID programs overseas. A major recipient of these funds is the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening, which receives billions under the guise of aiding smaller countries like Venezuela and Georgia. However, a portion of this money seems to funnel back to politicians, including powerful figures on the boards of these organizations. This situation feels like textbook money laundering, and if the American public were aware, there would likely be significant outrage over our tax dollars being misused.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

US Politicians both Republicans and Democrats getting huge kickbacks from USAID programs overseas “One of the biggest USAID receivers of this money is called the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening. They have a lot of USA money going into there, billions, billions into SEPs. It's in the form of small awards like development in Venezuela, in Georgia. So it has these labels for helping to develop smaller countries. But in reality — a certain percentage goes to the Republicans and a certain percentage goes to the Democrats” Powerful politicians sit on the boards of the organizations that decide the money is going to be sent overseas, and then the money comes back to them This is TEXTBOOK money laundering “All the organizations that we've discussed so far have major powerful politicians on their boards. We're talking about individuals, for example, like Lindsey Graham. She was talking about Steny Hoyer the former Democratic representative from Maryland All these people are very powerful and they sit on the board for these things. And there are all these politicians that are in control of money that isn't going to where it should be going. If the American people saw this, there would be outrage” These are our tax dollars being stolen by the billions.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 1983, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was created with bipartisan support. Organizations like the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and National Republican Institute (IRI) were formed to spread democratic ideals, but their actions are now questionable. A significant amount of USAID money flows into the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS), amounting to billions of dollars. CEPPS then distributes funds to the IRI, NDI, and the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES). These groups also receive separate funding directly from USAID, essentially getting double the money. The NED, funded by the State Department, also funnels money to the NDI, Republicans, and Internews Network. Powerful politicians sit on the boards of these organizations, raising concerns that the money isn't being used as intended, which would likely spark public outrage if exposed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: It's weird. It almost seems like it has somehow been captured by groups that want to spread chaos. I had to do Speaker 1: a lot of research to this. What happens is that, again, it goes back to communism. In 1983, we made an NGO called the National Endowment for Democracy, and it had both Republicans and Democrats involved. The NDI, the National Democratic Institute and the National Republican Institute, these two, it's spreading money for the world to support democratic incentives. But what they're actually doing is not super clear now. A lot of USAID money actually goes into different entities. The interesting thing is though, one of the biggest USAID receivers of this money is called CEPPS, CEPPS, the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening. But they have a lot of USA money going into there. Billions. Billions into CEPPS. It's in the form of small awards like development in Venezuela and Georgia. So it has these labels for helping to develop smaller countries. But in reality, CEPPS CEPS is one big pot. And so a certain percentage goes to the Republicans, the IRI, and a certain percentage goes to the Democrats, the NDI, and then another group, the International Foundation for Election Systems, the IFES. Wow. Then these three groups also separately receive their own USAID money. They receive double USAID money, first from SEPS, then from USAID directly. Then if you want to back up the NED, the National Endowment for Democracy, that one. That one accepts money from the Department of State. Then they also give money back to the NDI and to the Republicans. And they also finance Internews Network. I'm sorry, it's so hard to explain because it's so complicated. This is my first interview. I was just going to say, the really interesting thing is that all the organizations that we've discussed so far have major powerful politicians on their boards. We're talking about individuals, for example, like Lindsey Graham. Oh, yes. So she was talking about Staney Hoyer, the former Democratic representative from Maryland. All these people are very powerful and they sit on the board for these things. And there are all these politicians that are in control of money that isn't going to where it should be going. If the American people saw this, there would be outrage.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 11, 2025 at 1:25 AM

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 3:00 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

If an employee at a mega corporation setup a shell company and started laundering millions of dollars to themselves they’d go to prison This is what US Politicians did in government with NGOs. It’s the EXACT SAME THING They’re money laundering criminals and should go to prison

@Real_RobN — 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Posted - May 26, 2025 at 1:53 AM

Saved - May 27, 2025 at 5:38 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I discussed the failure of Republicans to codify DOGE cuts and questioned whether USAID's DOGE team has found any evidence of radical left Democrats, like Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi, receiving money directly from USAID. I believe that USAID and NGOs are intertwined with Congress, leading to issues like bribery and money laundering. I also referenced Elon Musk's confidence that a significant amount of this money returns to the U.S., suggesting that many members of Congress are unusually wealthy.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here is why Republicans failed to codify DOGE cuts. Has USAID’s DOGE team found any evidence that any of the radical left Democrats — such as Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, or Nancy Pelosi — have received money directly from USAID? Absolutely: USAID + NGOs (Government funded non-governmental organizations) = U.S. Congress—bribery, money laundering and racketeering. @elonmusk “I am highly confident that a bunch of that money comes back to the U.S. and lands in the pockets of those you just mentioned.. I’ll just say there’s a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: My question is about USAID. Has the Doge team found any evidence that any of the radical left Democrats like Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID? And if so, will we be hearing about that evidence anytime soon? Speaker 1: Yeah. So the the there is a massive amount of corruption, it it is circuitous. So what happens is there's money that obviously it's your taxpayer money that that is then sent to various government organizations who then send it to to NGOs, which which an NGO is a non governmental organization, but obviously, it's a government funded non governmental organization, it's just an organization, it's just the government. And effectively, there's a giant fraud loophole, which is that the the government can send money to an NGO that is then no longer governed by the law laws of The United States. So they'll they'll send the money overseas to one NGO, then they'll go through a bunch of bunch of them. And then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to The United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned. But it is a circuitous route. It's not like it it it doesn't go directly. But let's just say that there's a lot of strangely wealthy members of congress where I'm I just can't I'm I'm trying to connect the dots of how do they become rich while earning how do they get 20,000,000 if they're earning 200,000 a year? Sounds that's how how do I just nobody can explain that. So so so something's yeah. We we we we're gonna try to figure it out and and and and certainly stop it from happening. So

@MarioNawfal — Mario Nawfal

Posted - July 21, 2025 at 6:55 AM

Saved - July 21, 2025 at 9:26 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I believe the Afghanistan war was primarily a money laundering scheme. The aim wasn't to fully conquer Afghanistan but to funnel money from the U.S. and Europe back to a transnational security elite, ensuring an ongoing conflict rather than achieving success.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

ASSANGE: AFGHANISTAN WAR WAS A MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME “The goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries, through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security elite. That is the goal. The goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.”

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@Rothmus 💯

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - October 11, 2025 at 10:33 PM

Saved - October 11, 2025 at 10:42 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report Tim Burchett’s claim that Congress members steer no-bid contracts to military contractors and buy stock in those firms before awards, scoring 500–600% returns. He cites Ukraine, says after Biden sent missile defenses to Ukraine, contractors get multi‑billion no‑bid deals, and insiders bought stock two weeks earlier. He concludes, “War is great for business,” implying it isn’t good for us.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 US Rep Tim Burchett exposes Congress Reps give military contractors no bid contracts and then buy stocks in those companies right before awarding the contracts He says Congress makes 500-600% return on their investments when doing this insider trading scam Tim Burchett says Congress did this during the Ukraine War “I'll give you a good, great example. When Joe Biden gave our our missile defense system” to Ukraine “We give them our missile defense system, and then we have to replenish ours — Some of those contractors we described get a multi, multi-billion with a B dollar no bid contract. And who do you think has bought stock in that, in that company? Members of Congress, 2 weeks prior to the president making that official notice. — They're making 500% and 600% return on investment. “War is great for business, it's great for the economy, but it's not good for, I don't think it's good for ourselves.“ “War is great for business”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0: 'So what do we get for a trillion dollars a year to the US military? Do we get anything in return?' Speaker 1: 'We get some enhanced stock portfolios.' 'I haven't voted for a penny for Ukraine, I'm proud of that. It's not my dadgum war.' 'Some of those contractors we described get a multi multi billion with a B dollar, no bid contract.' 'And who do you think has bought stock in that, in that company? Members of Congress, two weeks prior to the president making that official notice.' 'Return on their, 506100% return on their investment.' 'But why is impossible as to ban stock trading for members of Congress? That's a great idea.' 'I have the bill to do it, and that's why we have a bipartisan group, we've got a bill, but it's not going anywhere.' 'Why? Because too many members of Congress, I mean, we were told by leadership that, you know, these guys can't afford to be here.'

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So what do we get for a trillion dollars a year to the US military? Do we get anything in return? Speaker 1: We get some enhanced stock portfolios, and I'll give you a great example. When Joe Biden gave our military, or excuse me, our missile defense system, you know, I haven't voted for a penny for Ukraine, I'm proud of that. It's not my dadgum war. I'm not sending my 18 year old daughter to a country that most members of Congress couldn't find on a dadgum globe. And so you have, we give them our our missile defense system, and then we have to replenish ours, which we should. We can't be left naked without any of that defense. And guess what? Some of those contractors we described get a multi multi billion with a B dollar, no bid contract. And who do you think has bought stock in that, in that company? Members of Congress, two weeks prior to the president making that official notice. And, and you see it time and time again. I mean, do you honestly believe members of Congress are making five and six? You've met some of these guys. I mean, they don't, they can't come in out of the rain, some of them. I mean, I'm guilty of that as well. They No, no, can 500100% Speaker 0: Yeah, a lot of really damaged Speaker 1: Return on their, 506100% return on their investment. War is great for business. It's great for the economy, but it's not good for I don't think it's good for ourselves. Wouldn't Speaker 0: No, no, there's nothing worse. Killing people is not good. I know that's a controversial statement. Yeah. But why is impossible as to ban stock trading for members Speaker 1: of Congress? That's a great idea. I have the bill to do it, and that's why, you know, we have a bipartisan group again, myself and Priapall, and I never get her name right. Cortez and me and Chip Roy and a bunch of others, you know, we've got a, we've got a bill, but it's not going anywhere. Why? Because too many members of Congress, I mean, we were told by leadership that, you know, these, these guys can't afford, can't afford to be here. You know what? If you can't afford to be in congress and go get another dad gum job, more people have played professional baseball in the major leagues than a Benny Nights suit. It's kinda like be Speaker 0: an