I shared information about Minnesota Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski, who is calling for the arrest of Ilhan Omar. He claims to have evidence, including affidavits and eviction notices, supporting allegations of federal tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, and various state violations. He emphasizes that Omar was found guilty of campaign finance violations by the Minnesota campaign finance board and was ordered to return funds, labeling her as a "serial career criminal."
𝕏 Post Text
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And this is,
Minnesota, Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski and has the RECEIPTS: affidavits, eviction notices, documents…
Demanding for the arrest of Ilhan Omar for the crimes of federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, incest, kickbacks and acts of campaign fraud abuse from east coast to the Mississippi River, Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago and Florida.
“She @Ilhan was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota campaign finance board and ordered to return those funds. Ms @IlhanMN appears to be a serial career criminal.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm calling for an ethics investigation into Congresswoman Omar, urging Congresswoman Craig to act. I'm concerned about potential federal tax, immigration, and student loan fraud, along with state-level violations like perjury and campaign finance abuses.
These issues span multiple states and raise serious questions about her conduct. I'm presenting evidence and seeking answers. While some dismiss these concerns, the national media is starting to investigate, particularly regarding a possible sham marriage.
I suggest Omar follow the example of her predecessor and request an ethics investigation of herself to clear her name. I believe these investigations are crucial for justice and to safeguard national security, considering past behavior can indicate future actions.
Speaker 0: Omar on US House Committee on Foreign Affairs. I'm also asking congresswoman Craig to initiate ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. There are also violations of state ethics, or of the Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges for speeches she gave while she was in partial control of their budgets as a member of the House Higher Education Finance Committee, in both 2017 and 2018. She was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board three weeks ago in order to return those funds on June 6. Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence.
That is why I'm calling on our congresswoman Angie Craig to protect both our national security and our respect of the rule of law. Tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign abuse fraud from the East Coast to the Mississippi River. If those charges have been brought against congresswoman Michelle Bachman, the Star Tribune would not have said on Sunday that she was attempting to, quote, skirt the law, and then followed up with a front page story the next day on a pie in the sky proposal that had zero chances of becoming law. Minnesota deserves better. America demands more.
I'm presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics, and we'll take your questions. Here's the sampling of materials that I, have offered you today. Anybody who would like them, there's many more than this available, all over social media and, in printed, publicity, and elsewhere. So, with that, ladies and gentlemen, I'll take your questions.
Speaker 1: Please, representative, why are you asking Angie Craig, congressman Craig, to open this ethics investigation? Unless I'm missing something. I think she's on the transportation and agriculture committee.
Speaker 0: Yeah. She's my congresswoman. I'm from the Second District. That seems to me to be the best place to ask your elected representative to, represent you in forming an ethics investigation.
Speaker 1: Oh, so are you doing this as as a individual citizen of Minnesota? Are you doing this as representative?
Speaker 0: Well, I'm doing it as both. I'm a constituent of hers, and I am asking her as a constituent, and presenting it here today as a state representative, but asking her as a constituent to bring forward an ethics investigation. I could ask Nancy Pelosi, but she doesn't represent me. Congresswoman Craig does.
Speaker 2: Are you only allowed to to ask someone who represents you? The reason I'm asking is, I mean, you know, the party of the congresswoman, and I would assume the chances of it happening is pretty slim. Why not is the Republican Congress a congressperson?
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, you could ask any member of congress. Angie Craig is my US house of representative, my US congresswoman. And because of that, she is the one that made most sense to me to ask, to represent me, and represent, this pursuit of justice and and respect for the rule of law.
Speaker 2: And analysts will say this is just an attempt to embarrass or put her in a tough position as opposed to just getting the job done by going and asking a Republican congressperson to
Speaker 0: to pursue what you want to do. I would
Speaker 2: choose not
Speaker 0: Well, this is not about congresswoman Craig. It's not about about republican or democrat. It's about an avenue for me to, bring forward, these questions and get it in front of the US House of Representatives. What's the history of these sets of requests for investigations? Does congress respond to them?
I I believe some of them may do. Some may find it superficial and don't. I haven't really dug into that myself, but I I expect and have heard that they receive a lot of requests. Certainly, I don't know that many of them or all of them, contain, the level of importance, or the level of detail and information available that this already does.
Speaker 3: Are you expecting more information to come out, related to some of the questions you raised during this accident?
Speaker 0: I am. As a matter of fact, I talked to one of the people, David Steinberg, who has done a lot of the work. You will see his blog post in here that have the social media that some of you in the Minnesota media have referred to. And, if I can be critical, somewhat dismissed because it wasn't something that you found, but something that he found. Incidentally, as soon as David, Scott Johnson, and Preya, did their work, and I know this for sure with David.
He he took the screen captures of these social media accounts, and then formed a blog post, offered representative Omar comment before he published the blog post, heard nothing back from her, published the post, and shortly after the post was published, either depending on the situation, either her image on social media or, Ahmed Elmi's image was removed from their respective social media accounts. And I think that's important for you and the media to note, as you try to discern, what motives are and where the truth lies. What's the what's the end game here? Well, I think the end game is to find answers. The answers, have not been, pursued.
We're starting to see them be pursued. The national media is really starting to kick it into gear. I think the Star Tribune for their effort recently, although it was, it was not, the the level of of, inquiry that the main people wanted and expected. It was a great start. And so, I think the end game is for us to bring about, bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to, what appears to be a sham marriage, that, representative Omar has with or have with Omar, Ahmed Elmi from, 02/2009 to 02/2017.
Speaker 3: Should congresswoman, Craig dismiss or ignore your, your letter? What's your next, step in there? Any any other, plans, any other attempts to maybe refer this on to other agencies or officials?
Speaker 0: Well, one idea that, that I heard and it was actually from a democrat, and by the way, I've heard from democrat colleagues in the house, that are thanking me for my efforts to pursue this because they have the same concerns I do. I want you to know that. I'm not gonna name names. But one of those Democrats, offered to me that, what represent then representative Ellison did when he was running for office last year, and there was questions about his situation with his wife as he offered, you know what? I will ask for an ethics investigation upon myself.
And I think maybe a call from the media, a call from me, or a call from someone to say, represent Walmart, if you don't think this that these things, that there's there's problems here, do as your predecessor did. Ask for an investigation of yourself and clear your name. I think that would be a great inquiry. The the theory is that the shamari was needed to help him or her. We're not completely sure.
You know, there's a there's a bunch of I mean, you look at the tax fraud, probable cause that exists from the June 6, campaign finance stuff. I mean, probable cause is right there for tax fraud, federal and state. You can't deny that. But I think you need to go and and first of all, find out more about the marriage and start to get more people involved in digging through this stuff. The questions about people brought up questions about immigration, did it somehow help, Ahmed Elmi or someone come here, illegally or easier or get special preference.
There's questions about FAFSA. Incidentally, the marriage between Ahmed Elmi and, represent Omar occurred in 02/2009. As I understand, that was the first year that they both attended North Dakota State together. And during that two or or three or four years at North Dakota State, there were at least two instances at two different addresses that represent Omar, Ahmed Hersey, and Ahmed Elmi all lived at the same address. I think that should be interesting.
Speaker 2: Is that a real address or a ghost box?
Speaker 0: Elmi. I can't recall. There were two different ones, in two different points in time. So evidently, they may have moved to a different street address or something.
Speaker 1: Oh, representative has this, have you contacted a representative Craig to let her know that this is coming or
Speaker 0: is she I have not. And I haven't talked to representative Omar about it either. I know that was a question last year when I brought up the fact that representative Omar was taking money from three different, house three different state higher education institutions, directly in in conflict with Minnesota house rules, which she eventually then returned those thousands of dollars to them realizing, that she was wrong in doing that. But they I was asked by the media last year that very same question.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you. You know, I know that, at one point, the the then US attorney Andy Lugar made it clear in a statement that he he was not investing. The federal government was not investigating Ilhan Omar. Also, I believe that the state campaign finance board has the ability to refer items to promote jurisdictions. Obviously, the investigators, the IRS, the federal government, they're pretty aggressive and they're pretty good.
It doesn't appear that they're on this at all. Does that say anything to you?
Speaker 0: Well, the campaign finance board does do criminal referrals about campaign finance related items. And if you'll read the campaign, finance board's findings, and orders, from June 6, you'll realize as they, form their context out for it that they limited their approach, to items that concern campaign finance and didn't as a matter of fact, they didn't even see the tax forms.
Speaker 1: Right. But they didn't feel that the that the campaign finance portion of this reached a criminal, in their opinion.
Speaker 0: Well, she broke the law and she's paying the money back.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: It's she broke she broke the law.
Speaker 1: Right. Right. But I guess I'm I'm just wondering if if it it appears that people do have access. Obviously, US attorney, the campaign finance board regulate camera for items to criminal, entities or your criminal investigators. They've had accesses, and they haven't done that yet.
I mean, are they remiss in their actions?
Speaker 0: I think I think we I think we all are. I think they are. I think you are. I think I am. I think we all need to pursue justice and truth here.
And that's why I'm here today. Another exhibits in your package, the question of perjury. This isn't the best copy but this is representative Omar's, I'll just call it because it's called application for an order for service by alternate means. So as I understand it, represent Omar, approached the court and tried to get the divorce in 2017 from Ahmed Elmi without actually having him there. And in order to do that, she testified under perjury twice in here that she hadn't seen or heard of Ahmed Elmi since 02/2011.
And you'll find in your packet too and pray up Samsador Samsadar. I think I still struggle with her last name. Had this brought forward as I understand 02/2016. This is the affidavit of service of the eviction notice, for Ahmed Noor Saeed Elmi in 02/2012, a year after she said she had last heard from him. Less than 10 blocks from where she lived in Minneapolis.
Speaker 2: First of all, you say that, our national security is at stake. Would you outline for Minnesotans? And you're making some out some allegations in other areas, but specifically, powers our national security at stake here.
Speaker 0: If you interview the if you talk to the police, they will tell you that a person's past behavior is best indicator of their future behavior. Best predictor of the future behavior is our past behavior. I have laid out for you represent Omar's past behavior. And
