TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - November 15, 2023 at 10:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Recent history reveals a compromised Congress. Concerns arise as a high-end brothel ring used by politicians and military officials threatens national security. Chinese spies infiltrated Congress, with Rep. Swalwell's ties to a suspected Chinese spy sparking an investigation. Other instances include a former aide to Sen. Feinstein being a Chinese spy, an IT aide charged with bank fraud, and Rep. Ilhan Omar accused of being a paid agent. General Flynn also claims some members are compromised for child rape. It's time for action.

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

SPIES & LIES: RECENT HISTORY OF A COMPROMISED CONGRESS! Last week it was reported that a high-end brothel ring used by politicians and military officials sparked concerns national security had been compromised. Republican Rep. Mike Waltz said adversaries have used sex to get secrets before! Rep. Michael Waltz, R-Fla., told the Daily Mail in a statement Friday that he's “incredibly concerned” about the potential breach of national security through the brothel network. “As member of Intel and Armed Services committees these reports make me incredibly concerned about the security clearance process when our adversaries have a long history of using sex to gather secrets.” Congress has been infiltrated by Chinese spies attempting to get access to classified information in recent years. Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell's ties to a suspected Chinese spy Christine Fang, known as “Fang Fang” — who he was rumored to be banging — sparked an Ethics Committee investigation into his conduct. Also, Fang Fang reportedly slept with two unnamed US mayors as part of a yearslong intelligence campaign. Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy kicked Swalwell off of the House Intelligence Committee earlier this year due to his Fang Fang- Bang Bang connection. Swalwell isn't the only member of Congress tied up in a potential foreign espionage trap. A ex-aide to former Sen. Diane Feinstein, who worked as her driver in California for 20 years was a Chinese spy. In 2018, Imran Awan, who was a congressional IT aide to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was fired just after he was arrested trying to flee to Pakistan. Awan and his wife, Hina Alvi, were charged with bank fraud. Adam was also reportedly involved in theft of congressional equipment, massive data breaches of Congress members’ emails, likely espionage and more. This case involved data from 40 or more Democratic members of Congress. In 2019 it was reported that Rep. Ilhan Omar had been accused of being a paid agent of the government of Qatar and used her position in Congress to access sensitive information for the benefit of Iran, according to testimony in a civil suit in Florida. General Flynn said that there are members of Congress who are compromised for raping children. However, in addition to that, there have been foreign spies embedded in Congress on government payroll that’s coming from your dime for years. The madness must stop — and We The People need to demand it. It’s time to clean House! @GenFlynn @Crux41507251 @SunTzusWar @drawandstrike

Saved - July 1, 2024 at 1:11 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Ilhan Omar needs to be expelled from Congress https://t.co/HF9cYEMhDK

Saved - August 14, 2024 at 4:50 AM

@BehizyTweets - George

Just in case you're not aware, Ilhan Omar has been busted paying for votes in the past She's more than capable of stealing another election to stay in power Undercover reporters caught her vote harvesters exchanging $200 Ballot in 2020 https://t.co/BRLAhZH62O

Video Transcript AI Summary
Project Veritas has uncovered a video showing a man purchasing an absentee ballot registration form from a voter, giving him $200 as "pocket money," and expecting to collect the ballot later. This practice is illegal. It is suggested that a woman initiated this scheme involving payment for votes. Additionally, it is alleged that individuals working for Ilhan are involved in counting ballots and influencing voters at polling places, guiding them on whom to vote for, regardless of their English proficiency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Project Veritas has received an explosive piece of tape. The tape you're about to see shows a man buying a registration form for an absentee ballot from a voter, giving him, quote, pocket money, unquote, of $200 and expecting to collect his ballot when the voter receives it. Speaker 1: But that's illegal. Why? You don't care illegal. I have liars. Excuse me. Speaker 2: She's the one who came up with all this. Speaker 1: So she did it. She started this whole thing with the the pay to vote. Yeah. So the people that work for Ilhan are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. Speaker 2: And they become a manager in the prison too. Speaker 1: They walk with you to the booth, and then they go, oh, vote this guy vote this guy vote this guy vote even if you speak English.
Saved - October 30, 2024 at 9:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I revealed a 'PAY TO VOTE' ballot fraud operation in Minnesota, allegedly orchestrated by Ilhan Omar, a current member of Congress, and funded by Basim Sabri. It's claimed that Omar's associates are involved in counting the ballots and managing precincts.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, a ‘PAY TO VOTE’ ballot fraud operation in Minnesota run by a domestic terrorist currently serving in United States Congress Ilhan Omar, and financed by a Palestinian terrorist Basim Sabri. “She Ilhan Omar is the one who came up with this pay to vote.” “So the people that work for Ilhan Omar are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. And they become a manager in the precinct too.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
An explosive tape reveals a man purchasing an absentee ballot registration form from a voter, giving her $200 as "pocket money" and expecting to collect her ballot later. The voter initiated this practice of paying for votes. Workers associated with Ilhan are involved in counting the ballots and act as managers for voters, guiding them through the voting process. They influence voters on whom to select, even if the voters are English speakers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm very sorry. How are you? Project Veritas has received an explosive piece of tape. The tape you're about to see shows a man buying a registration form for an absentee ballot from a voter giving him, quote, pocket money, unquote, of $200 and expecting to collect his ballot when the voter receives it. She's the one who came up with all this. So she did it. She started this whole thing with the the pay to vote. Yeah. So the people that work for Ilhan are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. And they become a manager of the person too. Yeah. So counting the vote. And they become a manager of the prison too. They walk with you to the booth, and then they both, oh, vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote even if you speak English.
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 5:31 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

CONFIRMED BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, Ilhan Omar DID marry her brother and said she would 'do what she had to do to get him "papers" to keep him in U.S. Now, arrest @Ilhan at once, for immigration fraud, marriage fraud, incest, and for the crimes of defrauding the United States government.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ilhan Omar faced allegations that she married her biological brother, Ahmed Saeed Almi, in 2009 to help him gain legal status in the U.S. This claim resurfaced after a wedding certificate was discovered, prompting Omar to remain silent on the matter, stating she does not discuss her personal life. Abduhakim Osman, a notable figure in the Minneapolis Somali community, confirmed to the Daily Mail that Omar's marriage to her brother was intended for immigration purposes. At the time, Omar was in a religious marriage with Ahmed Hersey, which lacked a state record. Osman also mentioned the name of the Christian minister who officiated the marriage, although the minister has declined to comment on the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was first made a few years ago. Congresswoman Ilhan Omar tried to knock it down by calling it absurd. Then when the media turned up a wedding certificate, Omar went silent, refusing to make any comments at all, saying she does not talk about her family or personal life. Well, now others are talking like Abduhakim Osman, a prominent member of the Minneapolis Somali community, who is now on the record telling the Daily Mail that in 2009, Elon Omar married her biological brother Ahmed Saeed Almi so that he could legally remain in the US and attend college. At the time, Omar was married to Ahmed Hersey, but it was a religious marriage, meaning there was no Minnesota state record stating that she and Hersey were husband and wife, and so marrying her brother would allow her sibling to get his legal immigration documents. But mister Osman isn't just saying that Omar married her biological brother. He also gave the Daily Mail the name of the Christian minister who married them. That minister reportedly says she does not wanna be involved or interviewed about congresswoman Omar.
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 3:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Evidence and witnesses confirm that Rep. Ilhan married her brother to help him obtain residency. I urge Speaker Johnson and House GOP to take action and remove her from Congress. House Democrats should also address this issue, as it contradicts the values we stand for in America. What do you think?

@CreasonJana - C-Reason🇺🇸

Evidence and witnesses have come forward verifying the FACT that Rep @Ilhan (@IlhanMN) did marry her brother in order for him to get papers to stay in this country. @SpeakerJohnson @HouseGOP this needs to be dealt with and she needs to be kicked out of Congress. @HouseDemocrats, show you have a tini-tiny bit of morals left and deal with this issue. This goes against EVERYTHING that is good about America. Thoughts?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ilhan Omar previously dismissed claims about her personal life as absurd, but new information has emerged. Abduhakim Osman, a member of the Minneapolis Somali community, stated that Omar married her biological brother, Ahmed Saeed Almi, in 2009 to help him gain legal status in the U.S. At that time, Omar was in a religious marriage with Ahmed Hersi, which lacked official state recognition. This marriage allowed her brother to obtain immigration documents. Osman also mentioned the name of the Christian minister who officiated the marriage, although the minister has declined to comment or be interviewed about Omar.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was first made a few years ago, congresswoman Ilhan Omar tried to knock it down by calling it absurd. Then when the media turned up a wedding certificate, Omar went silent, refusing to make any comments at all, saying she does not talk about her family or personal life. Well, now others are talking like Abduhakim Osman, a prominent member of the Minneapolis Somali community, who is now on the record telling the Daily Mail that in 2009, Elon Omar married her biological brother Ahmed Saeed Almi so that he could legally remain in the US and attend college. At the time, Omar was married to Ahmed Hersi, but it was a religious marriage, meaning there was no Minnesota state record stating that she and Hersi were husband and wife, and so marrying her brother would allow her sibling to get his legal immigration documents. But mister Osman isn't just saying that Omar married her biological brother. He also gave the Daily Mail the name of the Christian minister who married them. That minister reportedly says she does not wanna be involved or interviewed about congresswoman Omar.
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 4:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, the full brother of Rep. Ilhan Omar. We were legally married in 2009 and divorced in 2017. The marriage was allegedly meant to circumvent U.S. immigration laws, leading to claims of marriage fraud and violations of federal laws.

@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy

This is Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. He is Rep. Ilhan Omar’s full BROTHER. Ilhan Omar legally married Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009. She later divorced him in 2017. She married him to break US immigration law & defraud America. Federal laws broken: 1. Marriage Fraud - 8 U.S. Code § 1325(c) 2. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) - 8 U.S.C. § 1325 3. Incest law

Saved - February 10, 2025 at 9:50 PM

@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes

Ilhan Omar is breaking the law. She has no business being in Congress or in this country. https://t.co/jc8dmxMeRO

Video Transcript AI Summary
At a recent seminar, I advised Somalis in the U.S. illegally on their rights regarding deportation. If questioned by ICE, you are not required to answer. Simply state you’ve been advised by a lawyer not to answer. Providing your name, immigration status, or mode of entry isn't mandatory. Learn the laws, prepare yourselves, and avoid disclosing unnecessary information. Know your rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, Ilhan Omar was caught on tape at some sort of seminar recently telling people, giving giving advice to Somalis who are in The United States illegally on their legal rights in helping to avoid deportation. The so so much pro America happening. So much. She's speaking of Somalish. Because I advised the Somalian people that if ICE attempts to question you They're not obligated to answer their questions. Just state that you are advised by a lawyer not to answer questions. Disclosure of your name, immigration status, mode of entry is not mandatory. Learn the laws and prepare yourself, she says about illegal immigrants. And in art, And refrain from disclosing information you would prefer them not to know. And, information. Well, maybe she'll be nice and offer these illegal immigrants, a fake marriage so that they too can become citizens of The United States under false pretenses.
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 11:56 AM

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

Turns out the FBI had evidence that Ilhan Omar did in fact marry her brother which is in violation of immigration laws and did nothing Calls for her to be expelled from Congress & deported are growing, this should happen https://t.co/nsSYS8XCQp

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's been known for a while that Ilhan Omar allegedly married her brother to help him enter the country illegally, which violates immigration law. The FBI reportedly had evidence confirming this but took no action. Republican operatives in Minnesota spent significant money on private investigators to determine if Ilhan Omar was a DNA match to her second husband. They collected DNA samples from different continents and found a conclusive match, indicating that her second husband was a sibling. The FBI arrested one of the involved individuals, Anton Lazaro, on separate charges right before the information was to be released. The FBI was allegedly uninterested in the information and said the statute of limitations had expired. The story was reported after viewing the website before it was taken down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it's been known for quite a while that Ilhan Omar apparently married her own brother to help him gain entry illegally into the country. That's a violation of immigration law. That actually happened, it turns out. And now we're learning the FBI had evidence to confirm it, but didn't do anything about it. Randa Devine is an actual journalist. She works at the New York Post where she writes a column. She joins us tonight to explain what exactly happened. Randa, thanks so much for coming on. Speaker 1: Pleasure, Taka. Well, some, basically, Republican operatives, up in Minnesota decided to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on private investigators to really find out if Ilhan Omar was a genetic match, the DNA match to, the man who was her second husband. They went to three continents. They found a cigarette butt and a drinking straw, which, they decided. They sent it to an a DNA laboratory and found conclusively, that the DNA matched that the second husband was a sibling, according to this DNA sample. So, the the very day that they were going to unleash this on the world, and in fact, I was interviewing one of the people involved, the FBI swooped on, the the gentleman, Anton Lazaro, from this, this Republican, pack up in Minnesota, and arrested him on some different charges. Who knows whether, you know, he's guilty or not guilty. I mean, he's not guilty until, proven, but he's in jail. And so his story never got to see the light of day. I mean, luckily, he'd he'd, told the FBI they were not interested. They told him the statute of limitations had run out. We managed to see the website before he took it down, before he was arrested, and managed to report the story such as it was.
Saved - May 7, 2025 at 5:07 AM

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

Holy Sht 🔥 (MTG) is calling for the Censure of Ilhan Omar, says she's a foreign agent working in the interests of Somalia not America Most Americans think she should be expelled from Congress for marrying her brother to help him gain citizenship...this should happen https://t.co/WHMEbiqnQa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Ilhan Omar is accused of treasonous statements made at a Minneapolis event on 01/27/2024. It is claimed Omar told Somalians she would pressure the US government into certain actions, assuring them the US government will only do what Somalians in the US tell them to do, and that Somalia will never be in danger as long as she is in US Congress. The resolution states that Omar said she is there to protect the interest of Somalia from inside the US system. Referencing George Washington's warning against pretended patriotism, the resolution asserts Omar's statements violate her oath to defend the US Constitution and reveal her as a foreign agent acting on behalf of Somalia. The resolution calls for the censure of Ilhan Omar, her presentation in the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure, a public reading of the resolution by the speaker, and her removal from the Committee on the Budget and the Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Follows. Recognized. Centuring representative Ilhan Omar of Somali I mean, Minnesota. Whereas elected members of congress take an oath to bear true faith and allegiance to The United States without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. Whereas representative Ilhan Omar took an oath of allegiance to The United States upon becoming a citizen declaring, I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen. Whereas on 01/27/2024, representative Omar gave remarks at an event in Minneapolis in which she made treasonous statements. Whereas representative Omar said she has spoken to many Somalians who asked her to intercede for the Somali government by pressuring the United States government into certain actions. Whereas representative Omar assured the Somalian she spoke to, the US government will only do what Somalians in The US tell them to do. They will do what we want and nothing else. They must follow our orders and that is how we will safeguard the interest of Somalia. Whereas representative Omar continued, for as long as I am in US Congress, Somalia will never be in danger. Its waters will not be stolen by Ethiopia or others. Sleep in comfort knowing I am here to protect the interest of Somalia from inside The US system. Whereas George Washington warned in his farewell address of 1796 to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism and further declared citizens by birth or choice of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. Whereas these statements by representative Omar clearly violate the oath she took as an elected member of congress to defend and protect The United States constitution. Whereas representative Omar has exhibited the treasonous tendencies George Washington warned about. And her actions must be condemned by all members of congress who adhere to the oath they took upon assuming office. And whereas by openly admitting her efforts to advance Somalia's interest using her position as a United States Representative, Representative Omar has revealed herself to be a foreign agent acting on behalf of a foreign government. Now therefore be it resolved that representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota be censured. Representative Ilhan Omar forthwith present herself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure. Representative Ilhan Omar be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the speaker and representative Ilhan Omar be and is hereby removed from the committee of the budget and the committee on education and the workforce.
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 12:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing that Minnesota Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski has gathered various documents, including affidavits and eviction notices, to demand the arrest of Ilhan Omar. He accuses her of multiple serious crimes, including federal tax and immigration fraud, perjury, bigamy, and campaign fraud, spanning from the east coast to the Mississippi River.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this is, Minnesota, Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski and has the RECEIPTS: affidavits, eviction notices, marriage certificate, documents… Demanding for the arrest of Ilhan Omar @Ilhan @IlhanMN for the crimes of federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, incest, kickbacks and acts of campaign fraud abuse from east coast to the Mississippi River, including Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago and Florida.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A state representative is calling for an ethics investigation into Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, requesting Congresswoman Angie Craig to initiate it. The representative alleges Omar has committed federal tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign finance abuse. These violations allegedly occurred in multiple states. The representative claims Omar was found guilty of violating Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges for speeches given while she had partial control of their budgets. He believes Omar is a "serial career criminal" who shouldn't have access to national secrets. When questioned about why he was asking Congresswoman Craig, he stated she is his representative. He also addressed questions about why he hadn't approached a Republican congressperson, stating it wasn't about party affiliation but about getting the information before the House. He anticipates more information will emerge and believes the "endgame" is to find answers about Omar's marriage to Ahmed Elmi. He suggests Omar should request an ethics investigation of herself to clear her name. He also claims the marriage may have been a sham to help Elmi immigrate. He alleges Omar committed perjury when seeking a divorce. He believes national security is at stake, arguing past behavior predicts future behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Omar on the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs. I'm also asking congresswoman Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. There are also violations of state ethics, or of the Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges for speeches she gave while she was in partial control of their budgets as a member of the House Higher Education Finance Committee, in both 2017 and 2018. She was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board three weeks ago in order to return those funds on June 6. Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence. That is why I'm calling on our congresswoman Angie Craig to protect both our national security and our respect of the rule of law. Tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign abuse fraud from the East Coast to the Mississippi River. If those charges have been brought against congresswoman Michelle Bachman, the Star Tribune would not have said on Sunday that she was attempting to, quote, skirt the law, and then followed up with a front page story the next day on a pie in the sky proposal that had zero chances of becoming law. Minnesota deserves better. America demands more. I'm presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics, and we'll take your questions. Here's the sampling of materials that I, have offered you today. Anybody who would like them, there's many more than this available, all over social media and, in printed, publicity and elsewhere. So, with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll take your questions. Speaker 1: Yes, representative. Why are you asking Angie Craig? Congressman Craig to open this ethics investigation? Unless I'm missing something. I think she's on the transportation and agriculture committee. Speaker 0: Yeah, she's my congresswoman. I'm from the Second District. That seems to me to be the best place to ask your elected representative to, represent you in forming an ethics investigation. Speaker 1: Oh, so are you doing this as as an individual citizen of Minnesota, or are you doing this as representatives? Speaker 0: Well, I'm doing it as both. I'm a constituent of hers, and I am asking her as a constituent, and presenting it here today as a state representative, but asking her as a constituent to bring forward an ethics investigation. I could ask Nancy Pelosi, but she doesn't represent me. Congresswoman Craig does. Speaker 2: Are you only allowed to to ask someone who represents you? The reason I'm asking is, I mean, you know, party of the congresswoman, and I would assume the chances of it happening pretty slim. Why not ask the Republican Congress Congressperson? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, you could ask any member of Congress. Angie Craig is my US House of Representatives, my US Congresswoman, and because of that, she is the one that made most sense to me to ask to represent me and represent this pursuit of justice and and respect for the rule of law. Speaker 2: And analysts will say this is just an attempt to embarrass her or put her in a tough position as opposed to just getting the job done by going and asking Republican congressperson to to pursue what Speaker 0: you're How would Speaker 2: you respond? Speaker 0: Well, this is not about congresswoman Craig. It's not about about Republican or Democrat. It's about an avenue for me to bring forward these questions and get it in front of the US House of Representatives. Speaker 2: What's the history of these sets of requests for investigations? Has Congress responded them? Speaker 0: I I believe some of them they do. Some they find it superficial and don't. I haven't really dug into that myself, but I I expect and have heard that they receive a lot Speaker 2: of Speaker 0: requests. Certainly, don't know that many of them or all of them contain, the level of importance, or the level of detail and information available that this already does. Speaker 2: Are you expecting more information to come out related to some of questions Speaker 1: you raised during this time? Speaker 0: I am. As a matter of fact, I talked to one of the people, David Steinberg, who has done a lot of the work. You will see his blog posts in here that have the social media that some of you in the Minnesota media here have referred to. And, if I can be critical, somewhat dismissed because it wasn't something that you found, but something that he found. Incidentally, as soon as David and Scott Johnson and Preah did their work, and I know this for sure with David, he he took the screen captures of these social media accounts and then formed a blog post, offered representative Omar comment before he published the blog post, heard nothing back from her, published the post, and shortly after the post was published, either depending on the situation, either her image on social media or, Ahmed Elmi's image was removed from their respective social media accounts. And I think that's important for you and the media to note, as you try to discern, what motives are and where the truth lies. What's the what's the end game here? Well, I think the endgame is to find answers. The answers, have not been, pursued. We're starting to see them be pursued. The national media is really starting to kick it into gear. I think the Star Tribune for their effort recently, although it was, it was not, the the level of of inquiry that Matthew many people wanted and expected. It was a great start, and so, I think the end game is for us to bring about bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to what appears to be a sham marriage that representative Omar has with or have with Omar Ahmed Elmi from 02/2009 to 02/2017. Speaker 3: Should congresswoman Craig dismiss or ignore your your letter? What's your next step in there? Any any other plans? Any other attempts to maybe refer this onto other agencies or officials? Speaker 0: Well, one idea that that I heard and it was actually from the Democrat. And by the way, I've heard from Democrat colleagues in the house that are thanking me for my efforts to pursue this because they have the same concerns I do. I want you to know that. I'm not gonna name names. But one of those democrats, offered to me that, what represent then representative Ellison did when he was running for office last year, and there was questions about his situation with his wife as he offered, you know what? I will ask for an ethics investigation upon myself. And I think maybe a call from the media, a call from me, or a call from someone to say, representative Omar, if you don't think this that these things, that there's there's problems here, do as your predecessor did. Ask for an investigation of yourself and clear your name. I think that would be a Speaker 2: great inquiry. The theory is that the Speaker 0: Shanmari was needed to help him or her? We're not completely sure. You know, there's a there's a bunch of I mean, you look at the tax fraud probable cause that exists from the June 6 campaign finance stuff. I mean, probable cause is right there for tax fraud, federal and state. You can't deny that. But I think you need to go and and, first of all, find out more about the marriage and start to get more people involved in digging through this stuff. The questions about people brought up questions about immigration. Did it somehow help Ahmed Elmi or someone come here, illegally or easier or get special preference. There's questions about FAFSA. Incidentally, the marriage between Ahmed Elmi and, represent Omar occurred in 02/2009. As I understand, that was the first year that they both attended North Dakota State together. And during that two or or three or four years at North Dakota State, there were at least two instances at two different addresses that represent Omar, Ahmad Hersey, and Ahmad Elmi all lived at the same address. Was that I think that should be interesting. Speaker 2: Is that a real address or a post box? Speaker 0: I can't recall. There were two different ones, in two different points in time, so evidently they may have moved to a different street address or something. Speaker 1: Representative has this have you contacted representative Craig to let her know that this was coming or she just I Speaker 0: have not and I haven't talked to representative Omar about it either. I know that was a question last year when I brought up the fact that representative Omar was taking money from three different house three different state higher education institutions, directly in in conflict with Minnesota House rules, which she eventually then returned those thousands of dollars to them realizing, that she was wrong in doing that. But they I was asked by the media last year that very same question. Speaker 1: Let me ask you, you know, I know that, at one point the the then US attorney Andy Luger made it clear in a statement that he he was not invested. The federal government was not investigating Ilhan Omar. Also, I believe that the state campaign finance board has the ability to refer items to promote jurisdictions. Obviously, the investigators, the IRS, the federal government, they're pretty aggressive and they're pretty good. It doesn't appear that they're on this at all. Does that say anything to you? Speaker 0: Well, the Campaign Finance Board does do criminal referrals about campaign finance related items, and if you'll read the Campaign Finance Board's findings and orders, from June 6, you'll realize as they, form their context out for it that they limited their approach, to items that concerned campaign finance and didn't, as a matter of fact, they didn't even see the tax forms. Speaker 1: Right, but they didn't feel that the the campaign finance portion of this reached a criminal element in their opinion. Speaker 0: Well, she broke the law and she's paying the money back. It's she broke. She broke Speaker 1: the law. Right, right. But I guess I'm I'm just wondering if it it it appears that people who do have access. Obviously US Attorney, the campaign finance board regulate camera for items to criminal entities or criminal investigators. They've had access to this and they haven't done that yet. I mean, are they remiss in their actions? Speaker 0: I think I think we I think we all are. I think they are. I think you are. I think I am. I think we all need to pursue justice and truth here, and that's why I'm here today. Another exhibits in your packet, The question of perjury. This isn't the best copy, but this is representative Omar's I'll just call it because it's called application for an order for service by alternate means. So as I understand it, representative Omar, approached the court and tried to get the divorce in 2017 from Ahmed Elmi without actually having him there. And in order to do that, she testified under perjury twice in here that she hadn't seen or heard of Ahmed Elmi since 02/2011. And you'll find in your packet too, and Prayya Samsador Samsador I think I still struggle with her last name, had this, brought forward as I understand 02/2016. This is the affidavit of service of the eviction notice, for Ahmed Noor Saeed Elmi in 02/2012, a year after she said she had last heard from him less than 10 blocks from where she lived in Minneapolis. Speaker 2: You say that our national security is Speaker 0: at stake. Speaker 2: You outline for Minnesotans? And you're making some some allegations in other areas, but specifically, how is our national security at stake here? Speaker 0: If you would interview the if you talk to the police, they will tell you that a person's past behavior is the best indicator of their future behavior. Best predictor of their future behavior is their past behavior. I have laid out for you represent Omar's past behavior. And
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 1:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have received information that includes bank records, voter registration details, and confirmation from a whistleblower that Adam Schiff is guilty of perjury, voter fraud, and mortgage fraud, violating both state and federal laws. A complaint has been submitted to various U.S. House agencies, highlighting that Schiff has misrepresented his principal residence on mortgage applications across two states. The statute of limitations allows for prosecution based on the discovery date, and a formal complaint was filed earlier this year.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, Bank Records, voter registration records and a WHISTLEBLOWER CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, Adam Schiff is guilty of perjury, voter fraud and mortgage fraud violating both state and federal law. “This complaint has been submitted to multiple U.S. House agencies and to the House Judiciary, House Ethics and House Oversight Committee. And it’s true Adam Schiff has been checking the box principal residence on multiple mortgage applications in two different states.” The good news is that the statute of limitations begins at the date of discovery. A complaint was officially filed earlier this year by Christine Bish and Darren Ellis. In other words, the Trump DOJ can arrest, charge, indict, prosecute and incarcerate the fraud @SenAdamSchiff for the crimes of perjury, voter fraud and bank fraud. A Republican member of Congress was charged with criminal counts for doing the same fucking thing, Steven Watkins, of Oklahoma. Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP) @OfficialFBOP @ChanelRion @PamBondi FULlL COMPLAINT: https://thedrilldown.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/OCT.-2024-Bish-Schiff-Complaint.pdf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Investigative journalists Christine Bisch and John Stubbins filed an ethics complaint alleging that Adam Schiff committed fraud and perjury by declaring his homes in California and Maryland as his primary residences, violating state and federal laws. This allows manipulation of the system for lower mortgage rates, property taxes, and insurance rates. Seamus Bruner reports that Schiff checked the "principal residence" box on mortgage applications in both states. In 2009, Schiff admitted to a "mistake," but refinanced his Maryland property in 2011 and 2013, again checking the "principal residence" box. He recently refinanced again, checking "second home." While penalties for such actions seem low, Maryland has harsher penalties for mortgage fraud. A Trump DOJ could prosecute these crimes, arguing the statute of limitations hasn't expired because the complaint was recently filed and a potential whistleblower is coming forward with new evidence. Schiff has been accused of manufacturing storylines against Donald Trump. Documents have been submitted to house investigative committees.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One such bog dweller, it should come as no surprise to anyone, is chief Trump hating, failed Hollywood Script Writer, California Representative, Adam Schiff. Veteran Investigators Christine Bisch and John Stubbins filed an ethics complaint last week alleging that Adam Schiff committed fraud and perjury by declaring both his homes in California and Maryland as his primary residence, thereby violating state and federal laws, so they say. Now many lawmakers keep a place in Washington, especially if they represent a state from far away like Schiff does. But only one of their homes can be considered their primary residence. And if you're a lawmaker, your primary residence must technically be in the district you represent. Makes sense. But if you keep two primary residences, you are able to manipulate the system, get lower mortgage rates. And this is exactly what Bisch and Stubbins allege. This story emerges as Schiff runs for the US Senate against a backdrop where California homelessness has hit record highs and cost of living has driven Californians out. The ethics complaint lists apparent discrepancies in Schiff's voting record, where Schiff claims both homes in Maryland and California as primary residences between 02/2002 and 02/2013. The hypocrisy is glaring. Just this year, Adam Schiff's democrats pushed Robert f Kennedy junior off the ballot in New York over his debates about his various residencies. Would they dare hold these same standards up to Adam Schiff? Joining us now to discuss the exclusive details is best selling author and investigative journalist Seamus Brunner, author of Controllogarchs. Seamus, welcome back. Speaker 1: Hey, Chanel. It's great to be with you. Yeah. Adam Schiff, is in a world of trouble if the legal system is fair. I know that this complaint has been submitted to multiple US, house agencies and to the house judiciary, house ethics, and house oversight committee. And it's true. Adam Schiff has been checking the box principal residence on multiple mortgage applications in two different states. You can't live in two places at once as your principal residence, and mortgage fraud is a serious crime. Speaker 0: Walk us through the timeline for this. I know that this is coming from a variety of documents that are verifiable through public records, but walk us through the timeline here. Where do we start? Speaker 1: Yeah. So this all starts really around 02/2001, between 02/2001 and 02/2003. Adam Schiff is from California. He gets elected to Congress and then he starts commuting like you laid out in the in the intro here. He then sells his condo in Burbank, California and buys a place in Maryland. And so on that box of his mortgage application in Maryland, he checks, this will be my principal residence. But then he buys a condo in, Burbank, and then he checks the box, this will be my principal residence in Burbank. And so when he's checking these boxes in Maryland, principal residence, he's potentially committing voter fraud in California because throughout 02/1989, his voter registration documents say he's living in Burbank. And so he goes back and forth checking these boxes all the way up through a refinance in 2013, of his of his Maryland property saying that this is my principal residence. And so it's just it doesn't it doesn't make sense. How could you be living in both places at once? And I'm glad you mentioned the financial benefits. It's not just the lower, mortgage interest rates. You get a lower interest rate on your primary residence. It's also the lower property taxes. You get a homestead exempt exemption. It's also you get lower insurance rates on your primary residence. And then there's also the federal tax returns with the mortgage interest deduction. And so, there's all kinds of financial benefits for doing this. It's not clear whether Adam Schiff got sloppy or greedy, possibly both, but this is a big problem. There was a conviction of a Baltimore State Attorney, Marilyn Mosby is her name. She was convicted for mortgage fraud for a very similar circumstance. As you mentioned, Robert F. Kennedy junior, the Democrats tried to kick him off of the ballot or successfully did in New York for a similar residency, discrepancy. And there's a host of other people who have had this problem of declaring two primary residences in places where they're actually not living full time. Speaker 0: Now I have reached out to the shift campaign for comment about the story. We have. And they've yet to respond as of this broadcast. What has Adam Schiff said in response to this explosive allegation? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, I mean, this this really became a a a public news story back in 02/2009 with a bunch of other congress members who were doing this. Doris Matsui, who is from California, she was in big trouble for declaring residency both in Maryland and in California. A bunch of congressmen have gotten into this this, problem before. Back in 02/2009, Schiff was mentioned for this because he's been doing it for that long. And he said he actually admitted, oh, I made a mistake. Now, you can't make a mistake and profit financially from that mistake without consequences. But nonetheless, Nancy Pelosi was in charge of the house, you know, back then, and she should have investigated. But, of course, why would she? So that that was back in 02/2009. He said, quote, mistake. They said it was a clerical clerical error in 02/2009. But here's the here's the thing. They said in 02/2009, it was a mistake and a clerical error. He refinanced the Maryland property in 02/2011 and in 02/2013, and he checked the box principal residence both of those years. And so, if it was a mistake now we know now he refinanced the Maryland property, around 2020 recently. And guess what? He checks the box second home. And so that is basically an admission that he knew he was violating these rules. And in twenty eleven, thirteen, he had full knowledge of what he was doing and he checked the box anyway. Speaker 0: Well, Seamus, clearly the penalties for committing this kind of perjury and fraud are not very high. If lawmakers are doing this, have done this, and seem to continue to do this, I'd see it just doesn't look like they're worried about being penalized or punished. Speaker 1: Yeah. If this were Donald Trump, they would have buried him under the prison by now. But for Adam Schiff, he gets off scot free. And so what's really interesting, actually, is going to see how this develops because in Maryland, the penalties are extremely harsh, much harsher than in California for committing mortgage fraud, for checking the wrong box on these loan applications. And so what would be interesting is if he says that, actually, this whole time all along Schiff has maintained that, yes, he is a full time resident of Burbank. He is a primary resident of Burbank, California, where his district is. It looks really bad if you're trying to represent people, but that's not where you live. I don't it's not even allowed under, house rules. Also, it would be voter fraud if he was claiming that he could vote in California if he was actually a Maryland resident. But what's interesting is the Maryland penalties are much stricter than the California penalties. So if justice were to be done, Adam Schiff's best argument would be to say, actually, I have been a Maryland resident all along because you would want to avoid the twenty year prison sentence that mortgage fraud could carry in that state. Speaker 0: Incredible point. And that is something, I guess, the other lawmakers haven't really faced. They come from states that are a little more lenient about this. But, again, Democrats seem to get away with this kind of stuff. I I know you cover, corruption and political corruption on both sides of the aisle, but inordinately, Democrats get away with these kinds of games, shenanigans, and mistakes way more than Republicans do. And I I don't see that changing anytime soon. Speaker 1: Well, here's the thing, Chanel. These could be federal crimes. And so if there is a change in the administration, I suspect a a president Harris would, look the other way on her good friend from California, Adam Schiff. But a Trump presidency, a Trump DOJ, could prosecute these crimes. Now, Adam Schiff will likely argue that the statute of limitations has run out on some of these things. It was, you know, quite a way quite a while ago. However, because the statute of limitations actually only kicks in for certain crimes once upon the date of discovery, which is very recently, actually. Most people did not know about this until very, very recently. This complaint filed by Christine Bisch was not filed until this year. And so, you know, some of these details, some of this evidence means that no one knew about these things until just recently. So the statute of limitations may not kick in. Federal crimes are prosecuted by the DOJ. Trump would have an opportunity to, you know, the Trump DOJ to investigate these matters. Speaker 0: Oh, that's an excellent point. But then didn't you say that some of these allegations had popped up a few years ago with Schiff? I guess not conclusively. Speaker 1: Not conclusively. There is a potential whistleblower, someone who is willing to come forward. We're still talking to him, who worked in the, the mortgage company, who saw these things and said this is perjury, said what Adam Schiff has done is perjury. And so, you know, when a whistleblower can come forward and bring forth new evidence that no one else would have had access to, that would bring, you know, that would bring up the statute of limitations potentially. Speaker 0: Interesting. No. That's a that's that's an angle, I think, that hasn't been pointed out before. Well, know, Schiff is such an interesting player. And I say that I use that word carefully, but it's hard to look at Adam Schiff with a straight face. This is a man who has year for years manufactured manufactured storylines against Donald Trump just to sully the entire Trump presidency. He's manufactured evidence about Russian involvement or at least promoted documentation that was clearly not true. And with a straight face, would tell the world that Trump was involved in Russian oligarchs and he was, you know, meddled with the election. And here's Schiff himself trying to stand up and say he's a credible guy. It's a joke. Speaker 1: Yeah. It it it totally is. I mean, it's there in black and white. We've got all of the documents posted on thedrilldown.com. These have been, you know, submitted by Christine Bisch to the house investigative committees, and, it's it's pretty much smoking gun. I mean, he he can say that he screwed up, but many many other average Americans have been convicted with far less evidence for this serious crime. And so, you know, it's it's it it really upsets people when you have to you and I have to live by all of the rules, and then someone like Adam Schiff, who is loaded off of all of his, you know, policy you know, he gets very rich being a congressman. We don't know how these people like Nancy Pelosi, queen Nancy Pelosi, get so rich off of their public service. But Adam Schiff has done extremely well for himself, and for him to be taking these additional financial benefits and not repaying them. He needs to repay, as a form of restitution the benefits he got. These were these loans were federally, subsidized, federally backed loans. And so taxpayers are on the hook for such loans. And so for him to be taking advantage like this is unconscionable. Speaker 0: I think the key to this whole conversation will be on when that statute of limitations actually kicks in. And I'm sure there's going to be a lot of debate about that. But I think that's key to this conversation. Did it kick in back when it was discussed? Back when you know, what is what is discovering? Right? And that'll be a that'll be a realm for the lawyers to argue, I'm sure. Alright, Seamus. Don't go anywhere. We have a we have to take a quick break. But you're also working on another story. You actually put out a great report recently, and it really sounds the alarm on voter rolls. Stay right here. We'll be right back.
Home | The Drill Down The official website of the Government Accountability Institute and The Drill Down podcast with Peter Schweizer thedrilldown.com
Saved - May 5, 2025 at 8:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered a 'PAY TO VOTE' ballot fraud operation in Minnesota, allegedly run by Ilhan Omar and financed by Basim Sabri. It’s claimed that her staff are involved in counting the ballots and managing precincts. I believe she should face serious consequences for this, whether it’s federal prison or being sent back to Somalia.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, a ‘PAY TO VOTE’ ballot fraud operation in Minnesota run by a foreign illegal currently serving in United States Congress Ilhan Omar, and financed by a Palestinian terrorist Basim Sabri. “She @IlhanMN is the one who came up with this pay to vote.” “So the people that work for @Ilhan are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. And they become a manager in the precinct too.” Now, she can fuck off to a federal prison or back to Somalia, @FBIDirectorKash @PamBondi Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP) @OfficialFBOP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Project Veritas has obtained a tape appearing to show a man buying an absentee ballot registration form from a voter. The man allegedly gave the voter $200 as "pocket money" and expected to collect the ballot once received. According to the tape, a woman initiated a "pay to vote" scheme. Individuals working for Ilhan Omar are allegedly counting ballots. Furthermore, these individuals became managers in a prison, escorting inmates to voting booths and instructing them on who to vote for, regardless of whether the inmates speak English.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Project Veritas has received an explosive piece of tape. The tape you're about to see shows a man buying a registration form for an absentee ballot from a voter, giving him, quote, pocket money, unquote, of $200 and expecting to collect his ballot when the voter receives it. Speaker 1: She's the one who came up with all this. So she did it. She started this whole thing with the the pay to vote. Yeah. So the people that work for Ilhan are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. And they become manager in the prison too. They walk with you to the booth, and then they vote, oh, vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote even if you speak English.
Saved - June 1, 2025 at 6:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m highlighting Minnesota Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski's claims against Ilhan Omar, presenting various documents as evidence. He states that she was found guilty of violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board and ordered to return funds. Drazkowski accuses her of multiple serious crimes, including federal tax and immigration fraud, perjury, bigamy, and campaign finance abuse, and is calling for her arrest, urging Trump and the DOJ to take action against her.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this is: Minnesota Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski — and he has the receipts: affidavits, eviction notices, marriage certificates, documents… “I am presenting you with a copy of my letter and JUST A SAMPLING of the materials available to you on these topics.” “She [@Ilhan] was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board and was ordered to return those funds. Ms. [@IlhanMN] appears to be a serial career criminal.” Now, he is demanding for the arrest of Ilhan Omar for crimes including federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal and state student loan fraud, federal and state violations of perjury, bigamy, incest, kickbacks, and campaign finance abuse—spanning from the East Coast to the Mississippi River: Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. It’s time for Trump, @FBIDirectorKash, and the Trump DOJ @AGPamBondi to put this career criminal behind bars where she belongs.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A state representative is asking Congresswoman Angie Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into Congresswoman Omar, alleging federal tax, immigration, and student loan fraud, as well as state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign finance abuse. These violations allegedly occurred in multiple states. The representative also cites violations of Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges. He claims Omar appears to be a "serial career criminal" who shouldn't have access to national secrets. When questioned about why he's asking Craig, a Democrat, instead of a Republican, he stated that Craig is his representative and he is pursuing justice. He believes answers are needed regarding Omar's marriage to Ahmed Elmi from 2009-2017, which he calls a "sham marriage." He suggests Omar should request an ethics investigation herself to clear her name. He also alleges Omar committed perjury in 2017 when seeking a divorce. He believes national security is at stake due to Omar's alleged past behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Omar on the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs. I'm also asking congresswoman Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. There are also violations of state ethics, or of the Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges for speeches she gave while she was in partial control of their budgets as a member of the House Higher Education Finance Committee, in both 2017 and 2018. She was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board three weeks ago in order to return those funds on June 6. Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence. That is why I'm calling on our congresswoman Angie Craig to protect both our national security and our respect of the rule of law. Tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign abuse fraud from the East Coast to the Mississippi River. If those charges have been brought against congresswoman Michelle Bachman, the Star Tribune would not have said on Sunday that she was attempting to, quote, skirt the law, and then followed up with a front page story the next day on a pie in the sky proposal that had zero chances of becoming law. Minnesota deserves better. America demands more. I'm presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics, and we'll take your questions. Here's the sampling of materials that I, have offered you today. Anybody who would like them, there's many more than this available, all over social media and, in printed, publicity and elsewhere. So, with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll take your questions. Speaker 2: Yes, representative. Why are you asking Angie Craig? Congressman Craig to open this ethics investigation? Unless I'm missing something. I think she's on the transportation and agriculture committee. Speaker 0: Yeah, she's my congresswoman. I'm from the Second District. That seems to me to be the best place to ask your elected representative to, represent you in forming an ethics investigation. Speaker 2: Oh, so are you doing this as as an individual citizen of Minnesota, or are you doing this as representatives? Speaker 0: Well, I'm doing it as both. I'm a constituent of hers, and I am asking her as a constituent, and presenting it here today as a state representative, but asking her as a constituent to bring forward an ethics investigation. I could ask Nancy Pelosi, but she doesn't represent me. Congresswoman Craig does. Speaker 1: Are you only allowed to to ask someone who represents you? The reason I'm asking is, I mean, you know, party of the congresswoman, and I would assume the chances of it happening pretty slim. Why not ask the Republican Congress Congressperson? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, you could ask any member of Congress. Angie Craig is my US House of Representatives, my US Congresswoman, and because of that, she is the one that made most sense to me to ask to represent me and represent this pursuit of justice and and respect for the rule of law. Speaker 1: And analysts will say this is just an attempt to embarrass her or put her in a tough position as opposed to just getting the job done by going and asking Republican congressperson to to pursue what Speaker 0: you're How would Speaker 1: you respond? Speaker 0: Well, this is not about congresswoman Craig. It's not about about Republican or Democrat. It's about an avenue for me to bring forward these questions and get it in front of the US House of Representatives. Speaker 1: What's the history of these sets of requests for investigations? Has Congress responded them? Speaker 0: I I believe some of them they do. Some they find it superficial and don't. I haven't really dug into that myself, but I I expect and have heard that they receive a lot Speaker 1: of Speaker 0: requests. Certainly, don't know that many of them or all of them contain, the level of importance, or the level of detail and information available that this already does. Speaker 1: Are you expecting more information to come out related to some of questions Speaker 2: you raised during this time? Speaker 0: I am. As a matter of fact, I talked to one of the people, David Steinberg, who has done a lot of the work. You will see his blog posts in here that have the social media that some of you in the Minnesota media here have referred to. And, if I can be critical, somewhat dismissed because it wasn't something that you found, but something that he found. Incidentally, as soon as David and Scott Johnson and Preah did their work, and I know this for sure with David, he he took the screen captures of these social media accounts and then formed a blog post, offered representative Omar comment before he published the blog post, heard nothing back from her, published the post, and shortly after the post was published, either depending on the situation, either her image on social media or, Ahmed Elmi's image was removed from their respective social media accounts. And I think that's important for you and the media to note, as you try to discern, what motives are and where the truth lies. What's the what's the end game here? Well, I think the endgame is to find answers. The answers, have not been, pursued. We're starting to see them be pursued. The national media is really starting to kick it into gear. I think the Star Tribune for their effort recently, although it was, it was not, the the level of of inquiry that Matthew many people wanted and expected. It was a great start, and so, I think the end game is for us to bring about bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to what appears to be a sham marriage that representative Omar has with or have with Omar Ahmed Elmi from 02/2009 to 02/2017. Speaker 3: Should congresswoman Craig dismiss or ignore your your letter? What's your next step in there? Any any other plans? Any other attempts to maybe refer this onto other agencies or officials? Speaker 0: Well, one idea that that I heard and it was actually from the Democrat. And by the way, I've heard from Democrat colleagues in the house that are thanking me for my efforts to pursue this because they have the same concerns I do. I want you to know that. I'm not gonna name names. But one of those democrats, offered to me that, what represent then representative Ellison did when he was running for office last year, and there was questions about his situation with his wife as he offered, you know what? I will ask for an ethics investigation upon myself. And I think maybe a call from the media, a call from me, or a call from someone to say, representative Omar, if you don't think this that these things, that there's there's problems here, do as your predecessor did. Ask for an investigation of yourself and clear your name. I think that would be a Speaker 1: great inquiry. The theory is that the Speaker 0: Shanmari was needed to help him or her? We're not completely sure. You know, there's a there's a bunch of I mean, you look at the tax fraud probable cause that exists from the June 6 campaign finance stuff. I mean, probable cause is right there for tax fraud, federal and state. You can't deny that. But I think you need to go and and, first of all, find out more about the marriage and start to get more people involved in digging through this stuff. The questions about people brought up questions about immigration. Did it somehow help Ahmed Elmi or someone come here, illegally or easier or get special preference. There's questions about FAFSA. Incidentally, the marriage between Ahmed Elmi and, represent Omar occurred in 02/2009. As I understand, that was the first year that they both attended North Dakota State together. And during that two or or three or four years at North Dakota State, there were at least two instances at two different addresses that represent Omar, Ahmad Hersey, and Ahmad Elmi all lived at the same address. Was that I think that should be interesting. Speaker 1: Is that a real address or a post box? Speaker 0: I can't recall. There were two different ones, in two different points in time, so evidently they may have moved to a different street address or something. Speaker 2: Representative has this have you contacted representative Craig to let her know that this was coming or she just I Speaker 0: have not and I haven't talked to representative Omar about it either. I know that was a question last year when I brought up the fact that representative Omar was taking money from three different house three different state higher education institutions, directly in in conflict with Minnesota House rules, which she eventually then returned those thousands of dollars to them realizing, that she was wrong in doing that. But they I was asked by the media last year that very same question. Speaker 2: Let me ask you, you know, I know that, at one point the the then US attorney Andy Luger made it clear in a statement that he he was not invested. The federal government was not investigating Ilhan Omar. Also, I believe that the state campaign finance board has the ability to refer items to promote jurisdictions. Obviously, the investigators, the IRS, the federal government, they're pretty aggressive and they're pretty good. It doesn't appear that they're on this at all. Does that say anything to you? Speaker 0: Well, the Campaign Finance Board does do criminal referrals about campaign finance related items, and if you'll read the Campaign Finance Board's findings and orders, from June 6, you'll realize as they, form their context out for it that they limited their approach, to items that concerned campaign finance and didn't, as a matter of fact, they didn't even see the tax forms. Speaker 2: Right, but they didn't feel that the the campaign finance portion of this reached a criminal element in their opinion. Speaker 0: Well, she broke the law and she's paying the money back. It's she broke. She broke Speaker 2: the law. Right, right. But I guess I'm I'm just wondering if it it it appears that people who do have access. Obviously US Attorney, the campaign finance board regulate camera for items to criminal entities or criminal investigators. They've had access to this and they haven't done that yet. I mean, are they remiss in their actions? Speaker 0: I think I think we I think we all are. I think they are. I think you are. I think I am. I think we all need to pursue justice and truth here, and that's why I'm here today. Another exhibits in your packet, The question of perjury. This isn't the best copy, but this is representative Omar's I'll just call it because it's called application for an order for service by alternate means. So as I understand it, representative Omar, approached the court and tried to get the divorce in 2017 from Ahmed Elmi without actually having him there. And in order to do that, she testified under perjury twice in here that she hadn't seen or heard of Ahmed Elmi since 02/2011. And you'll find in your packet too, and Prayya Samsador Samsador I think I still struggle with her last name, had this, brought forward as I understand 02/2016. This is the affidavit of service of the eviction notice, for Ahmed Noor Saeed Elmi in 02/2012, a year after she said she had last heard from him less than 10 blocks from where she lived in Minneapolis. Speaker 1: You say that our national security is Speaker 0: at stake. Speaker 1: You outline for Minnesotans? And you're making some some allegations in other areas, but specifically, how is our national security at stake here? Speaker 0: If you would interview the if you talk to the police, they will tell you that a person's past behavior is the best indicator of their future behavior. Best predictor of their future behavior is their past behavior. I have laid out for you represent Omar's past behavior. And
Saved - June 10, 2025 at 3:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed Ilhan Omar's controversial marriage with former ICE Director Tom Homan on @LoomerUnleashed. He wouldn't confirm if she's under investigation but hinted at it. I believe she should be deported instead of making laws in Congress, where I feel she's pushing for an Islamic takeover.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Ilhan Omar married her brother and committed immigration fraud in our country. Last night on @LoomerUnleashed, I asked Border Czar and former ICE Director Tom Homan @RealTomHoman if Omar is under investigation for marrying her brother. He wouldn’t deny it, but he smiled and said he couldn’t discuss investigations. She should be deported, not writing our laws in Congress where she’s advocating for an Islamic takeover of America.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A reporter asked if Republicans would investigate Congresswoman Ilhan Omar for allegedly marrying her brother and committing immigration fraud. The reporter stated this claim was previously reported and confirmed. They inquired whether Omar's citizenship could be revoked if she is found to have committed immigration and student loan fraud. The respondent stated they could not discuss any investigation. The reporter then stated that many people wonder why there are "jihadists" and "anti-American immigrants" serving in Congress who are perpetuating open borders. The respondent stated that they are aware of the situation, but cannot discuss it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now that Republicans are back in control, can we expect to see some type of immigration investigation into Congresswoman Ilhan Omar? There was a report, this was a story I broke, and it's since been confirmed that she married her brother and committed immigration fraud. Can you speak to whether or not there's any investigations into congresswoman Omar's immigration fraud via the marriage to her brother and whether or not her citizenship could potentially be revoked if, you guys also find that she did in fact commit immigration fraud and student loan fraud? I can't discuss any, investigation. Okay. All right. Well, I figured I would just ask because a lot of people, always wonder why we have jihadists serving in Congress, why we have anti American immigrants serving in Congress who are perpetuating this open border. We're aware of that situation, but I can't discuss it. Oh, so you are aware of it. Okay, great. So you guys are aware.
Saved - June 12, 2025 at 1:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported on Minnesota Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski, who is alleging marriage fraud against Ilhan Omar. He claims to have substantial evidence, including affidavits and immigration records. Drazkowski is calling for her arrest by ICE for various crimes, including marriage and tax fraud, spanning multiple states. He also mentions that Omar was found guilty of violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board and ordered to return funds, labeling her a serial career criminal. He insists she should be deported after serving her sentence.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this is Minnesota — Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski reporting marriage fraud. He has the receipts: affidavits, immigration records, eviction notices, marriage certificates, documents… “I am presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics.” He is now demanding that @ICEgov arrest Ilhan Omar for crimes, including marriage fraud, federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal and state student loan fraud, federal and state perjury, bigamy, incest, kickbacks, and campaign finance abuse — spanning from the East Coast to the Mississippi River: Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. “She [@Ilhan] was found guilty of violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board and was ordered to return those funds. Ms. [@IlhanMN] appears to be a serial career criminal.” And once she serves her sentence, she shall fuck off and be deported.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Minnesota state representative is requesting Congresswoman Angie Craig initiate an ethics investigation into Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, alleging federal tax, immigration, and student loan fraud, as well as state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign finance abuse. These alleged violations occurred in multiple states, including Minnesota, and also concern potential violations of Minnesota House ethics rules related to college speeches. The representative claims Omar appears to be a "serial career criminal" who should not have access to national secrets. He presented documents to support his claims and referenced social media posts that were allegedly removed after being published by David Steinberg. He believes the "endgame" is to find answers about Omar's marriage to Ahmed Elmi, which he alleges was a sham. He suggests Omar should request an ethics investigation of herself to clear her name, as her predecessor did. He also claims that probable cause exists for tax fraud. The representative stated that he has not contacted either Congresswoman Craig or Congresswoman Omar about this. He believes that the media, the US Attorney, and the Campaign Finance Board are remiss in their actions and that "we all need to pursue justice and truth here."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Omar on the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs. I'm also asking congresswoman Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. There are also violations of state ethics, or of the Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges for speeches she gave while she was in partial control of their budgets as a member of the House Higher Education Finance Committee, in both 2017 and 2018. She was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board three weeks ago in order to return those funds on June 6. Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence. That is why I'm calling on our congresswoman Angie Craig to protect both our national security and our respect of the rule of law. Tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign abuse fraud from the East Coast to the Mississippi River. If those charges have been brought against congresswoman Michelle Bachman, the Star Tribune would not have said on Sunday that she was attempting to, quote, skirt the law, and then followed up with a front page story the next day on a pie in the sky proposal that had zero chances of becoming law. Minnesota deserves better. America demands more. I'm presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics, and we'll take your questions. Here's a sampling of materials that I, have offered you today. Anybody who would like them, there's many more than this available, all over social media and, in printed, publicity and elsewhere. So, with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll take your questions. Speaker 1: Yes, representative. Why are you asking Angie Craig, congressman Craig, to open this ethics investigation? Unless I'm missing something. I think she's on the transportation and agriculture committee. Speaker 0: Yeah. She's my congresswoman. I'm from the Second District. That seems to me to be the best place to ask your elected representative to, represent you in forming an ethics investigation. Speaker 1: Oh, so are you doing this as as an individual citizen of Minnesota? Are you doing this as representative? Speaker 0: Well, I'm doing it as both. I'm a constituent of hers and I am asking her as a constituent and presenting it here today as a state representative, but asking her as a constituent to bring forward an ethics investigation. I could ask Nancy Pelosi, but she doesn't represent me. Congresswoman Craig does. Speaker 2: Are you only allowed to to ask someone who represents you? The reason I'm asking is, I mean, you know, I'm a party of the congresswoman, and I would assume the chances of it happening pretty slim. Why not ask the Republican congress congressperson? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, you could ask any member of congress. Angie Craig is my US House of Representatives, my US congresswoman, and because of that, she is the one that made most sense to me to ask to represent me and represent, this pursuit of justice and and respect for the rule of law. Speaker 2: Yeah. Analysts will say this is just an attempt to embarrass her or put her in a tough position as opposed to just getting the job done by going and asking a Republican congressperson to to pursue what she Speaker 0: wanted to do. How would you smile? Well, this is not about congresswoman Craig. It's not about about Republican or Democrat. It's about an avenue for me to, bring forward, these questions and get it in front of The US House Of Representatives. What's the history of these sets of requests for investigations? Has Congress responded to them? I I believe some of them may do. Some they find is superficial and don't. I haven't really dug into that myself, but, I I expect and have heard that they receive a lot of, requests. Certainly, I don't know that many of them or all of them, contain, the level of importance, or the level of detail and information available that this already does. Speaker 3: Are you expecting more information to come out related to some of questions you raised here in this afternoon? Speaker 0: I am. As a matter of fact, I've talked to one of the people, David Steinberg, who has done a lot of the work. You will see his blog posts in here that have the social media that some of you in the Minnesota media have referred to. And, if I can be critical, somewhat dismissed because it wasn't something that you found, but something that he found. Incidentally, as soon as David and Scott Johnson and Preah did their work, and I know this for sure with David, he he took the screen captures of these social media accounts, and then formed a blog post, offered representative Omar comment before he published the blog post, heard nothing back from her, published the post, and shortly after the post was published, either depending on the situation, either her image on social media or, Ahmed Elmi's image was removed from their respective social media accounts. And I think that's important for you and the media to note, as you try to discern, what motives are and where the truth lies. Who's the what's the endgame here? Well, I think the endgame is to find answers. The answers, have not been, pursued. We're starting to see them be pursued. The national media is really starting to kick it into gear. I think the Star Tribune for their effort recently, although it was, it was not, the the level of of inquiry that many people wanted and expected. It was a great start, and so, I think the end game is for us to bring about bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to what appears to be a sham marriage that representative Omar has with or had with Omar Ahmed Elmi from 2009 to 2017. Speaker 3: Should Congresswoman Craig dismiss or ignore your your letter? What's your next step in there? Any other plans? Any other attempts to maybe refer this onto other agencies or officials? Speaker 0: Well, one idea that, that I heard, and it was actually from a Democrat. And by the way, I've heard from Democrat colleagues in the house, that are thanking me for my efforts to pursue this because they have the same concerns I do. I want you to know that. I'm not gonna name names. But one of those Democrats, offered to me that, what represent then representative Ellison did when he was running for office last year, and there was questions about his situation with his wife as he offered, you know what? I will ask for an ethics investigation upon myself. And I think maybe a call from the media, a call from me, or a call from someone to say, represent Omar. If you don't think this that these things, that there's there's problems here, do as your predecessor did. Ask for an investigation of yourself and clear your name. I think that would be a great inquiry. The theory is that the Shan Marriage was needed to help him or her? We're not completely sure. You know, there's a there's a bunch of I mean, you look at the tax fraud probable cause that exists from the June 6, campaign finance stuff. I mean, probable cause is right there for tax fraud, federal and state. You can't deny that. But I think you need to go and and of all, out more about the marriage and start to get more people involved in digging through this stuff. The questions about people brought up questions about immigration. Did it somehow help Ahmed Elmi or someone come here illegally or easier or get a special preference? There's questions about FAFSA. Incidentally, the marriage between Ahmed Elmi and, represent Omar occurred in 02/2009. As I understand, that was the year that they both attended North Dakota State together. And during that two or or three or four years at North Dakota State, there were at least two instances at two different addresses that represent Omar, Ahmad Hersey, and Ahmad Elmi all lived at the same address. Was that I think that should be interesting. Speaker 2: Was that a real address or a post box? Speaker 0: No. I can't recall. There were two different ones, in two different points in time. So evidently, they may have moved to a different street address or something. Speaker 1: Contacted representative Craig to let her know that this was coming or she just I Speaker 0: have not, and I haven't talked to representative Omar about it either. I know that was a question last year when I brought up the fact that representative Omar was taking money from three different house three different state higher education institutions, directly in in conflict with Minnesota House rules, which she eventually then returned those thousands of dollars to them realizing that she was wrong in doing that. But they I was asked by the media last year that very same question. Speaker 1: Let me ask you. You know, I know that, at one point the the then US attorney Andy Luger made it clear in a statement that he was not invested. The federal government was not investigating. Ilhan Omar. Also, I believe that the state campaign finance board has the ability to refer items to promote jurisdictions. Obviously, the investigators, the IRS, the federal government, they're pretty aggressive and they're pretty good. It doesn't appear that they're on this at all. Does that say anything to you? Speaker 0: Well, the Campaign Finance Board does do criminal referrals about campaign finance related items. And if you'll read the Campaign Finance Board's findings and orders, from June 6, you'll realize as they form their context out that they limited their approach to items that concern campaign finance and didn't. As a matter of fact, they didn't even see the tax forms. Speaker 1: Right. But they didn't feel that the the campaign finance portion of this reached a criminal element in their opinion? Speaker 0: Well, she broke the law and she's paying the money back. Right. It's she broke. She broke the law. Speaker 1: Right, right. But I guess I'm I'm just wondering if it it it appears that people who do have access. Obviously, US Attorney, the campaign finance board regulate camera for items to criminal entities or criminal investigators. They've had access to this and they haven't done that yet. I mean, are they remiss in their actions? Speaker 0: Think I think we I think we all are. I think they are. I think you are. I think I am. I think we all need to pursue justice and truth here, and that's why I'm here today. Another exhibit, it's in your packet, the question of perjury. This isn't the best copy, but this is representative Omar's I'll just call it because it's called application for an order for service by alternate means. So as I understand it, representative Omar, approached the court and tried to get the divorce in 2017 from Ahmed Elmi without actually having him there. And in order to do that, she testified under perjury twice in here that she hadn't seen or heard of Ahmed Elmi since 02/2011. And you'll find in your packet too, and pray up Samsador Samsador. I still struggle with her last name, had this, brought forward as I understand 02/2016. This is the affidavit of service of the eviction notice, for Ahmed Nur Saeed Elmi in 02/2012, a year after she said she had last heard from him. Less than 10 blocks from where she lived in Minneapolis. Speaker 2: Representative, you say that our national security is at stake. Would you outline for Minnesotans? And you're making some out some allegations in other areas, but specifically, how was our national security at stake here? Speaker 0: If you would interview the if you talk to the police, they will tell you that a person's past behavior is the best indicator of their future behavior. Best predictor of their future behavior is their past behavior. I have laid out for you represent Omar's past behavior. And

@ICEgov - U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

☎️Report marriage fraud: 866-DHS-2-ICE 💍

@USCIS - USCIS

Marriage fraud is a federal crime. There will not be a happily ever after for this illegal alien who was ordered removed from the U.S. 14 years ago due to marriage fraud. She was taken into custody at our Orlando office by @ICEgov and our @FHPOrlando partners. Under @POTUS and

Saved - July 21, 2025 at 12:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe it's time for the DOJ to arrest Ilhan Omar without further investigation, as the evidence has already been presented. Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski has confirmed that Omar married her brother to help him stay in the U.S., providing various documents as proof. There are calls for her arrest on multiple charges, including federal tax and immigration fraud, perjury, and campaign finance violations, with implications across several states. Following her sentence, it is expected that she would be deported.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

It’s time for the DOJ to arrest Ilhan Omar. No investigation is required — it’s already been done. This is Minnesota — Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski CONFIRMS, BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT: Ilhan Omar did marry her brother and admitted she would “do what she had to do” to get him papers to stay in the U.S. He has the receipts: affidavits, eviction notices, marriage certificate, and other documents. There is now a demand for the arrest of Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan, @IlhanMN) for crimes including federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations such as perjury, bigamy, incest, kickbacks, and campaign finance abuse — spanning from the East Coast to the Mississippi River, including Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. 📝Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP) @OfficialFBOP And once she serves her sentence, the illegal alien will be deported by @ICEgov.

Saved - August 17, 2025 at 7:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that Ilhan Omar married her brother to help him with immigration, stating she would “do what she had to do.” There are various documents supporting this claim, including affidavits and a marriage certificate. Rep. Steve Drazkowski provided a letter and some materials on the matter.

@1Nicdar - DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Ilhan Omar married her brother and admitted she would “do what she had to do” to get him papers to stay in the U.S. He has the receipts: witnesses, sworn affidavits, eviction notices, marriage certificate, DNA, and other documents. Rep. Steve Drazkowski: “I am presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
“I’m asking congresswoman Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida.” “Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence.” “The endgame is to find answers.” “The endgame is for us to bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to what appears to be a sham marriage that representative Omar has with or had with Omar Ahmed Elmi from 2009 to 02/2017.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Omar on the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs. I'm also asking congresswoman Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. There are also violations of state ethics or of the Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges for speeches she gave while she was in partial control of their budgets as a member of the House Higher Education Finance Committee in both 2017 and 2018. She was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board three weeks ago in order to return those funds on June 6. Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence. That is why I'm calling on our congresswoman Angie Craig to protect both our national security and our respect of the rule of law. Tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign abuse fraud from the East Coast to the Mississippi River. If those charges have been brought against congresswoman Michelle Bachman, the Star Tribune would not have said on Sunday that she was attempting to, quote, skirt the law, and then followed up with a front page story the next day on a pie in the sky proposal that had zero chances of becoming law. Minnesota deserves better. America demands more. I'm presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics, and we'll take your questions. Here's the sampling of materials that I, have offered you today. Anybody who would like them, there's many more than this available, all over social media and, in printed, publicity and elsewhere. So, with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll take your questions. Speaker 1: Yes, representative. Why are you asking Angie Craig, congresswoman Craig, to open this ethics investigation? Unless I'm missing something. I think she's on the transportation and agriculture committee. Speaker 0: Yeah. She's my congresswoman. I'm from the Second District. That seems to me to be the best place to ask your elected representative to, represent you in forming an ethics investigation. Speaker 1: Oh, so are you doing this as as an individual citizen of Minnesota, or are you doing this as representative? Speaker 0: Well, I'm doing it as both. I'm a constituent of hers, and I am asking her as a constituent, and presenting it here today as a state representative, but asking her as a constituent to bring forward an ethics investigation. I could ask Nancy Pelosi, but she doesn't represent me. Congresswoman Craig does. Speaker 2: Are you only allowed to to ask someone who represents you? The reason I'm asking is, I mean, you know, party of the congresswoman, and I would assume the chances of it happening pretty slim. Why not ask the Republican congress congressperson? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, you could ask any member of congress. Angie Craig is my US House of Representatives, my US Congresswoman, and because of that, she is the one that made most sense to me to ask to represent me and represent this pursuit of justice and and respect for the rule of law. Speaker 2: And analysts would say this is just an attempt to embarrass her, put her in a tough position as opposed to just getting the job done by going and asking a Republican congressperson to to Speaker 1: pursue what Speaker 0: you want to do. How would you respond? Well, this is not about congresswoman Craig. It's not about about Republican or Democrat. It's about an avenue for me to, bring forward these questions and get it in front of the US House of Representatives. Speaker 2: What's the history of these sorts of requests for investigations? Speaker 0: Has Congress responded them? I I believe some of them may do. Some may find it superficial and don't. I haven't really dug into that myself, but I I expect and have heard that they receive a lot of requests. Certainly, I don't know that many of them or all of them contain, the level of importance, or the level of detail and information available that this already does. Speaker 2: Are you expecting more information to come out Speaker 0: I am. As a matter of fact, I talked to one of the people, David Steinberg, who has done a lot of the work. You will see his blog posts in here that have the social media that some of you in the Minnesota media here have referred to. And, if I can be critical, somewhat dismissed because it wasn't something that you found, but something that he found. Incidentally, as soon as David and Scott Johnson and Preah, did their work, and I know this for sure with David, he he took the screen captures of these social media accounts, and then formed a blog post, offered representative Omar comment before he published the blog post, heard nothing back from her, published the post, and shortly after the post was published, either depending on the situation, either her image on social media or Ahmed Elmi's image was removed from their respective social media accounts. And I think that's important for you and the media to note, as you try to discern, what motives are and where the truth lies. Speaker 2: What's the what's the endgame here? Speaker 0: Well, I think the endgame is to find answers. The answers, have not been, pursued. We're starting to see them be pursued. The national media is really starting to kick it the gear. I think the Star Tribune for their effort recently, although it was, it was not, the the level of of, inquiry that many people wanted and expected. It was a great start. And so I think the endgame is for us to bring about bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to what appears to be a sham marriage that representative Omar has with or had with Omar Ahmed Elmi from 2009 to 02/2017. Speaker 2: Should Congresswoman, Craig dismiss or ignore your, your letter? What's your next, step from there? What would mean? Any other plans, any other attempts to maybe refer this onto other agencies or officials? Speaker 0: Well, one idea that, that I heard was actually from the Democrat. And by the way, I've heard from Democrat colleagues in the house, that are thanking me for my efforts to pursue this because they have the same concerns I do. I want you to know that. I'm not gonna name names, but one of those Democrats, offered to me that, what represent then representative Ellison did when he was running for office last year, and there was questions about his situation with his wife as he offered, you know what? I will ask for an ethics investigation upon myself. And I think maybe a call from the media, a call from me, or a call from someone to say, representative Omar, if you don't think this that these things, that there's there's problems here, do as your predecessor did. Ask for an investigation of yourself and clear your name. I think that would be a great inquiry. Speaker 2: The the theory is that the Shan Marriage was needed to help him or her? Speaker 0: We're not completely sure. You know, there's a there's a bunch of I mean, you look at the tax fraud probable cause that exists from the June 6, campaign finance stuff. I mean, probable cause is right there for tax fraud, federal and state. You can't deny that. But I think you need to go and and first of all, find out more about the marriage and start to get more people involved in digging through this stuff. The questions about people brought up questions about immigration. Did it somehow help Ahmed Elmi or someone come here illegally or easier or get special preference. There's questions about FAFSA. Incidentally, the marriage between Ahmed Elmi and representative Omar occurred in 02/2009. As I understand, that was the first year that they both attended North Dakota State together. And during that two or or three or four years at North Dakota State, there were at least two instances at two different addresses that represent Omar, Ahmad Hersey, and Ahmad Elmi all lived at the same address. Was that I think that should be interesting. Is that a real address or a post box? No. I can't recall. There were two different ones, in two different points in time. So evidently, may have moved to a different street address or something. Speaker 1: Representative, does, have you contacted representative Craig to let her know that this was coming or she Speaker 0: just I have not. And I haven't talked to representative Omar about it either. I know that was a question last year when I brought up the fact that representative Omar was taking money from three different house three different state higher education institutions directly in in conflict with Minnesota House rules, which she eventually then returned those thousands of dollars to them realizing, that she was wrong in doing that. But they I was asked by the media last year that very same question. Speaker 1: Let me ask you. You know, I know that, at one point, the the then US attorney Andy Luger made it clear in a statement that he he was not investing the federal government was not investigating Ilhan Omar. Also, I believe that the state campaign finance board has the ability to refer items to promote jurisdictions. Obviously, the investigators, the IRS, the federal government, they're pretty aggressive and they're pretty good. It doesn't appear that they're on this at all. Does that say anything to you? Speaker 0: Well, the Campaign Finance Board does do criminal referrals about campaign finance related items. And if you'll read the campaign finance board's findings and orders from June 6, you'll realize as they form their context outboard that they limited their approach to items that concern campaign finance and didn't as a matter of fact, they didn't even see the tax forms. Speaker 1: Right. But they didn't feel that the the campaign finance portion of this reached a criminal element in their opinion. Speaker 0: Well, she broke the law and she's paying the money Speaker 1: back. Right? Speaker 0: It's she broke. She broke the law. Speaker 1: Right, right. But I guess I'm I'm just wondering if it it it appears that people who do have access. Obviously, US attorney, the campaign finance board regulate camera for items to criminal entities or criminal investigators. They've had access to this and they haven't done that yet. I mean, are they remiss in their actions? Speaker 0: I think I think we I think we all are. I think they are. I think you are. I think I am. I think we all need to pursue justice and truth here, and that's why I'm here today. Another exhibit is in your packet. The question of perjury. This isn't the best copy, but this is representative Omar's I'll just call it because it's called application for an order for service by alternate means. So as I understand it, representative Omar, approached the court and tried to get the divorce in 2017 from Ahmed Elmi without actually having him there. And in order to do that, she testified under perjury twice in here that she hadn't seen or heard of Ahmed Elmi since 02/2011. And you'll find in your packet too, and pray up Samsador Samsador I think I still struggle with their last name. Had this, brought forward as I understand 02/2016. This is the affidavit of service of the eviction notice for Ahmed Noor Saeed Elmi in 02/2012, a year after she said she had last heard from him. Less than 10 blocks from where she lived in Minneapolis. Speaker 2: Representative, you say that our national security is Speaker 0: at stake. Speaker 2: Would you outline for Minnesotans? And you're making some some allegations in other areas, but specifically, how is our national security at stake here? Speaker 0: If you interview the if you talk to the police, they will tell you that a person's past behavior is the best indicator of their future behavior. Best predictor of the future behavior is our past behavior. I have laid out for you represent Omar's past behavior. And
Saved - August 29, 2025 at 5:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I uncovered a major scandal involving Governor Tim Walz and Ilhan Omar, where a group of Somali criminals embezzled around $250 million from a government-funded NGO called ‘Feeding Our Future’. This money, meant to provide meals for children, was instead funneled into real estate, luxury vehicles, and international travel. Despite flagging suspicious activities, lawsuits were filed against Walz for racism, and the fraud persisted. One indicted individual even attempted to bribe a juror. It's shocking that Walz and Omar aren't facing legal consequences for these clear crimes.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is: Another Walz Bombshell: The Single Greatest Scam in American History: This is the trans refuge the Democrats chose for the 2024 Vice Presidency, Governor Tim ‘Tampon’ Walz allowed a group of politically connected Somali criminals, including Ilhan Omar, to embezzle approximately $250 million in public funds. • This was the single largest coved-scam related fraud during the Xi-Jinping -19 pandemic. • A government-funded non-governmental organization (NGO) called ‘Feeding Our Future’, based in Minnesota, received $250 million intended to provide meals for children in need. — Almost none of the funds were used for food. • Where did the money go? —— Real estate —— Luxury vehicles and car dealerships —— Expensive international travel —— $160,000 sent to a company in China —— $500,000 used to buy an apartment in Kenya • It gets worse: —— Ilhan Omar received thousands in donations. —— Donations were made using fake names like “Unique Problem” and “Friday Donations.” • The Tampon administration flagged the suspicious activity and froze the funds. —— In response, lawsuits were filed accusing Tampon of racism. —— Despite concerns, the fraud continued. • One of the individuals later indicted for fraud had received the Minnesota Outstanding Refugee Award from Tampon himself. —— That same individual was later accused of attempting to bribe a juror by delivering $120,000 in cash, with a note promising “more to come if she acquits.” How the fuck are @Tim_Walz and @Ilhan not in prison right now? Their crimes are pretty clear: Bribery, racketeering, conspiracy, robbery, theft, extortion, obstruction of justice and aiding and abetting.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've known Tim Walls for less than a week, and we've already found out. He let rioters burn down cities, lied about his military service, crushed small businesses, and turned Minnesota into a child sex change sanctuary. As governor, Walls let a gang of politically connected Somali fraudsters steal a quarter billion dollars of your money. It was the single biggest COVID scam in American history. Feeding Our Future got a quarter billion dollars to send food to needy kids, but almost none of it was used for food. The Somali scammers blew our cash on real estate, cars, and trips; a $160,000 went to a Chinese company, and a half a million to Kenya to buy an apartment. Ilhan Omar got thousands of dollars in donations from some of the scammers. These guys weren't criminal masterminds, it was sloppy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've known Tim Walls for less than a week, and we've already found out. He let rioters burn down cities, lied about his military service, crushed small businesses, and turned Minnesota into a child sex change sanctuary. But that's not it. Tonight, we're dropping another Walls bombshell. As governor, Walls let a gang of politically connected Somali fraudsters steal a quarter billion dollars of your money. It was the single biggest COVID scam in American history. During the pandemic, the government was giving out money left and right. A nonprofit in Minnesota, Feeding Our Future, got a quarter billion dollars to send food to needy kids. Sounds good. Right? Here's the problem. Almost none of it was used for food. The Somali scammers blew our cash on real estate, cars, extravagant git trips. We have wire transfers that show thousands going to car dealerships. A $160,000 went to some company in China. And a half a million was sent to Kenya to buy an apartment. A $500,000 apartment in Kenya is probably a palace. But our tax dollars weren't just used on goodies. The politicians got a taste too. Ilhan Omar got thousands of dollars in donations from some of the scammers. These guys weren't criminal masterminds, it was sloppy. When they cooked the books, they made up names of their fake clients. They came up with these names. Are you ready? Unique problem, Friday donations. How'd nobody catch that? Well, early on, Wall's administration thought it looked a little suspicious, so they froze the funds. Then the Somali sued and called Wall's racist, so he kept letting them steal. They didn't bother to crack into the bank accounts or issue subpoenas. Walls just put his hands in the air and said, I'm not racist. Take whatever you want. Minnesota has a huge Somali population. You can't get called racist and expect to win another election there. Walls even gave one of the fraudsters the Minnesota Outstanding Refugee Award. Three years later, she was indicted. No thanks to Walls, the feds came in after he ignored the problem for years. During the trial, the Somalis tracked down a juror and dropped off a hallmark bag on their doorstep filled with 120 g's and a little note saying there's more to come if she acquits. This all happened under Wall's nose. He had every chance to stop it and failed. Just like he failed to protect his city during the riots and just like he failed his unit when he retired before deployment. This is the guy Kamala Harris chose as her number two.
Saved - August 30, 2025 at 1:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe it's time for the FBI and DOJ to act against Ilhan Omar, whom I consider a "serial career criminal." Minnesota State Representative Steve Drazkowski has confirmed that Omar married her brother to help him stay in the U.S. He claims to have substantial evidence, including sworn affidavits and a marriage certificate. Drazkowski is calling for her arrest for various alleged crimes, including marriage and tax fraud, and highlights her past violations with the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board. He insists she should face consequences, including deportation after serving her sentence.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

It’s time for President Trump’s FBI (@FBIDirectorKash) and DOJ (@AGPamBondi) to arrest the “serial career criminal” Ilhan Omar. No investigation is required — the investigation has already been completed. This is Minnesota — Republican State Representative Steve Drazkowski CONFIRMS, BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT: Ilhan Omar married her brother and admitted she would “do what she had to do” to get him papers to stay in the U.S. He has the receipts: witnesses, sworn affidavits, eviction notices, a marriage certificate, DNA evidence, and other documents. Rep. Steve Drazkowski: “I am presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics.” He is now demanding the arrest of Ilhan Omar for crimes including marriage fraud, tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, perjury, bigamy, incest, kickbacks, bribery, campaign finance abuse — and for defrauding the United States government — spanning from the East Coast to the Mississippi River: Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. Rep. Steve Drazkowski: “She [@Ilhan] was found guilty of violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board and was ordered to return those funds. Ms. @IlhanMN appears to be a serial career criminal.” 📝 Federal Bureau of Prisons (@OfficialFBOP): And once she serves her sentence, the illegal alien is to be deported by @ICEgov.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Omar asks congresswoman Angie Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into Congresswoman Omar, citing 'federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse' in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. He notes Minnesota House ethics rule violations relating to speeches in 2017 and 2018. He states, 'Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence.' He frames this as seeking 'answers' and mentions a 'sham marriage' with Ahmed Elmi from 2009 to 2017, noting North Dakota State addresses and FAFSA questions. He concludes, 'The endgame here is to find answers,' and, 'If you interview the police, they will tell you that a person's past behavior is the best indicator of their future behavior.' He asserts, 'our national security is at stake.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Omar on the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs. I'm also asking congresswoman Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. There are also violations of state ethics, or of the Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges for speeches she gave while she was in partial control of their budgets as a member of the House Higher Education Finance Committee, in both 2017 and 2018. She was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board three weeks ago in order to return those funds on June 6. Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence. That is why I'm calling on our congresswoman Angie Craig to protect both our national security and our respect of the rule of law. Tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign abuse fraud from the East Coast to the Mississippi River. If those charges have been brought against Congresswoman Michelle Bachman, the Star Tribune would not have said on Sunday that she was attempting to, quote, skirt the law, and then followed up with a front page story the next day on a pie in the sky proposal that had zero chances of becoming law. Minnesota deserves better. America demands more. I'm presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics, and we'll take your questions. Here's a sampling of materials that I, have offered you today. Anybody who would like them, there's many more than this available, all over social media and, in printed, publicity and elsewhere. So, with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll take your questions. Speaker 1: Yes, representative. Why are you asking Angie Craig, congresswoman Craig, to open this ethics investigation? Unless I'm missing something. I think she's on the transportation and agriculture committee. Speaker 0: Yeah. She's my congresswoman. I'm from the Second District. That seems to me to be the best place to ask your elected representative to, represent you in forming an ethics investigation. Speaker 1: Oh, so are you doing this as as an individual citizen of Minnesota? Are you doing this as representative? Speaker 0: Well, I'm doing it as both. I'm a constituent of hers, and I am asking her as a constituent, and presenting it here today as a state representative, but asking her as a constituent to bring forward an ethics investigation. I could ask Nancy Pelosi, but she doesn't represent me. Congresswoman Craig does. Speaker 2: Are you only allowed to to ask someone who represents you? The reason I'm asking is, I mean, you know the party of the congresswoman, and I would assume the chances of it happening pretty slim. Why not ask the Republican Congress congressperson? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, you could ask any member of Congress. Angie Craig is my US House of Representatives, my US Congresswoman, and because of that, she is the one that made most sense to me to ask to represent me and represent, this pursuit of justice and and respect Speaker 2: for the rule of law. And analysts will say this just an attempt to embarrass her or put her in a tough position as opposed to just getting the job done by going and asking a Republican congressperson to to pursue what she Speaker 0: wanted to do. How would Speaker 2: you smile? Speaker 0: Well, this is not about congresswoman Craig. It's not about about Republican or Democrat. It's about an avenue for me to, bring forward, these questions and get it in front of The US House Of Representatives. Speaker 2: What's the history of these sifted requests for investigations? Has Congress responded to them? Speaker 0: I I believe some of them may do. Some may find it superficial and don't. I haven't really dug into that myself, but I I expect and have heard that they receive a lot of requests. Certainly, I don't know that many of them or all of them, contain, the level of importance, or the level of detail and information available that this already does. Speaker 2: Are you expecting more information to come out related to some of questions you raised during this time? Speaker 0: I am. As a matter of fact, I've talked to one of the people, David Steinberg, has done a lot of the work. You will see his blog posts in here that have the social media that some of you in the Minnesota media here have referred to. And if I can be critical, somewhat dismissed because it wasn't something that you found but something that he found. Incidentally, as soon as David and Scott Johnson and Preah did their work, and I know this for sure with David, he he took the screen captures of these social media accounts, and then formed a blog post, offered representative Omar comment before he published the blog post, heard nothing back from her, published the post, and shortly after the post was published, either depending on the situation, either her image on social media or, Ahmed Elmi's image was removed from their respective social media accounts. And I think that's important for you and the media to note, as you try to discern, what motives are and where the truth lies. What's the what's the endgame here? Well, I think the endgame is to find answers. The answers, have not been, pursued. We're starting to see them be pursued. The national media is really starting to kick it into gear. I think the Star Tribune for their effort recently, although it was, it was not, the the level of of inquiry that Matthew many people wanted and expected. It was a great start, and so, I think the end game is for us to bring about bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to what appears to be a sham marriage that represent Omar has with or have with Omar Ahmed Elmi from 2009 to 2017. Speaker 3: Should Congresswoman Craig dismiss or ignore your your letter? What's your next step in there? Any any other plans? Any other attempts to maybe refer this onto other agencies or officials? Speaker 0: Well, one idea that that I heard was actually from the Democrat. And by the way, I've heard from Democrat colleagues in the house that are thanking me for my efforts to pursue this because they have the same concerns I do. I want you to know that. I'm not gonna name names. But one of those democrats, offered to me that, what represent then representative Ellison did when he was running for office last year, and there was questions about his situation with his wife as he offered, you know what? I will ask for an ethics investigation upon myself. And I think maybe a call from the media, a call from me, or a call from someone to say, represent Omar, if you don't think this that these things, that there's there's problems here, do as your predecessor did. Ask for an investigation of yourself and clear your name. I think that would be a great inquiry. The theory is that the Shanmarie was needed to help him or her? We're not completely sure. You know, there's a there's a bunch of I mean, you look at the tax fraud probable cause that exists from the June 6, campaign finance stuff. I mean, probable cause is right there for tax fraud, federal and state. You can't deny that. But I think you need to go and and, first of all, find out more about the marriage and start to get more people involved in digging through this stuff. The questions about people brought up questions about immigration. Did it somehow help Ahmed Elmi or someone come here illegally or easier or get special preference? There's questions about FAFSA. Incidentally, the marriage between Ahmed Elmi and, represent Omar occurred in 02/2009. As I understand, that was the first year that they both attended North Dakota State together. And during that two or or three or four years at North Dakota State, there were at least two instances at two different addresses that represented Omar, Ahmad Hersey, and Ahmad Elmi all lived at the same address. Was that I think that should be interesting. Speaker 2: Is that a real address or a post box? Speaker 0: No. I can't recall. There were two different ones, in two different points in time. So evidently, may have moved to a different street address or something. Speaker 1: Representative, this have you contacted representative Craig to let her know that this was coming or she Speaker 0: just I have not, and I haven't talked to representative Omar about it either. I know that was a question last year when I brought up the fact that representative Omar was taking money from three different house three different state higher education institutions, directly in in conflict with Minnesota House rules, which she eventually then returned those thousands of dollars to them realizing that she was wrong in doing that. But they I was asked by the media last year that very same question. Speaker 1: Let me ask you, you know, I know that, at one point the the then US attorney Andy Luger made it clear in a statement that he he was not invested. The federal government was not investigating Ilhan Omar. Also, I believe that the state campaign finance board has the ability to refer items to promote jurisdictions. Obviously, the investigators, the IRS, the federal government, they're pretty aggressive and they're pretty good. It doesn't appear that they're on this at all. Does that say anything to you? Speaker 0: Well, the Campaign Finance Board does do criminal referrals about campaign finance related items. And if you'll read the Campaign Finance Board's findings and orders, from June 6, you'll realize as they, form their context out forth that they limited their approach, to items that concern campaign finance and didn't. As a matter of fact, they didn't even see the tax forms. Speaker 1: Right, but they didn't feel that the the campaign finance portion of this reached a criminal element in their opinion. Speaker 0: Well, she broke the law and she's paying the money back. Right. Speaker 1: It's she broke. She broke the law. Right, right. But I guess I'm I'm just wondering if it it appears that people who do have access. Obviously, US attorney, the campaign finance board regulate camera for items to criminal entities or criminal investigators. They've had access to this and they haven't done that yet. I mean, are they remiss in their actions? Speaker 0: Think I think we I think we all are. I think they are. I think you are. I think I am. I think we all need to pursue justice and truth here, and that's why I'm here today. Another exhibit, it's in your packet, the question of perjury. This isn't the best copy, but this is representative Omar's I'll just call it because it's called application for an order for service by alternate means. So as I understand it, representative Omar, approached the court and tried to get the divorce in 2017 from Ahmed Elmi without actually having him there. And in order to do that, she testified under perjury twice in here that she hadn't seen or heard of Ahmed Elmi since 02/2011. And you'll find in your packet too, and pray up Samsador Samsador I think I still struggle with their last name. Had this, brought forward, as I understand, 02/2016. This is the affidavit of service of the eviction notice for Ahmed Noor Saeed Elmi in 02/2012, a year after she said she had last heard from him. Less than 10 blocks from where she lived in Minneapolis. Speaker 2: Representative, you say that our national security is Speaker 0: at stake. Speaker 2: Would you outline for Minnesotans? And you're making some out some allegations in other areas, but specifically, how is our national security at stake here? Speaker 0: If you interview the if you talk to the police, they will tell you that a person's past behavior is the best indicator of their future behavior. Best predictor of the future behavior is their past behavior. I have laid out for you represent Omar's past behavior. And
Saved - October 6, 2025 at 3:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ilhan Omar's district in Minnesota is facing serious allegations, with over 1,000 investigations into corruption among the Somali community, which numbers around 70,000. Many of these individuals, brought in to support her election, reportedly rely heavily on social services, with over 90% utilizing some form of welfare. Authorities are now investigating various scams linked to this community, including fraudulent claims for feeding children, housing, and fake marriages and divorces, highlighting a troubling pattern of exploitation within the system.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The scandal of Ilhan Omar’s people scamming Minnesota 🚨 The Somalians in Ilhan Omar's district have over 1,000 investigations for corruption in Minneapolis out of a population of 70,000 centered there - They brought about 80,000 of these Somali Muslims in, they grouped them in one spot, and then they used that to elect her to Congress. That's how she got there. - According to the stats, is over 90% of these people have availed themselves of some sort of social service welfare program “Now the authorities in Minnesota have a huge investigation because these people have come up with all kind of different scams. Scams saying they were going to feed children, scams for housing, scams for fake marriages, fake divorces, you name it. They came here and they started scamming the system like nobody would believe. And these are her people all grouped together in Minnesota.“

Video Transcript AI Summary
Let's talk about Ilhan Omar's people in Minnesota. They brought about seventy, eighty thousand of these Somali Muslims in. They grouped them in one spot, and then they used that to elect her to congress. That's how she got there. Now one thing you need to remember, according to the stats is over 90% of these people have availed themselves of some sort of social service welfare program. Now, the authorities in Minnesota have a huge investigation because these people have come up with all kind of different scams—feeding children, housing, fake marriages, fake divorces, you name it. They came here and they started scamming the system like nobody would believe. And these are her people all grouped together in Minnesota. We're gonna talk about Dearborn, Michigan soon too.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about Ilhan Omar's people in, in Minnesota. So they brought about seventy, eighty thousand of these Somali Muslims in. They grouped them in one spot, and then they used that to elect her to congress. That's how she got there. Okay. Now one thing you need to remember, according to the stats is over 90% of these people have availed themselves of some sort of social service welfare program. Okay. Now, the, authorities in Minnesota have a huge investigation because these people have come up with all kind of different scams. Scams saying they're gonna feed children, scams for housing, scams for, fake marriages, fake divorces, you name it. They came here and they started scamming the system like nobody would believe. And these are her people all grouped together in Minnesota. We're gonna talk about Dearborn, Michigan soon too.
Saved - October 24, 2025 at 1:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that more Somalian foreigners in Minneapolis were convicted for stealing taxpayer money; $50 million was stolen and laundered overseas to Somalia. This is in Ilhan Omar’s district. The 74th person charged in the Feeding Our Future case, Ahmed Naji Sheikh, is the brother of Abdi Aziz Farah, who was sentenced to 28 years for stealing $50 million. Farah was convicted with others; Sheikh is accused of helping launder the money overseas.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

More foreigners from Somalia convicted in Minneapolis of stealing American taxpayer dollars $50 million stolen and you’ll never guess where they were laundering the money to…. Somalia This is Ilhan Omar’s district and her voters “Sending millions of dollars in taxpayer money out of the country — The 74th person to be charged in the $300 million Feeding Our Future meal fraud case, Ahmed Naji Sheikh, is the brother of one of the most notorious defendants, Abdi Aziz Farah, who was recently sentenced to 28 years in prison. Farah was convicted with a group of others of stealing $50 million of taxpayer money. Now his brother Sheikh is accused of helping him launder that money.” (Overseas to Somalia”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The report notes that Ahmed Naji Sheikh becomes the seventy-fourth person charged in the $300,000,000 feeding our future meal fraud case. Sheikh is described as the brother of Abi Aziz Farah, who was recently sentenced to twenty-eight years in prison. Farah was convicted with a group of others of stealing $50,000,000 of taxpayer money. Sheikh is accused of helping Farah launder that money. A second segment asserts that in a normal country there would be a major backlash, but liberals allegedly want this, calling it the greatest form of social justice and silencing anyone who speaks out against programs “getting robbed” that are meant to feed hungry children, labeling them bigots, racists, and intolerant. The speaker claims that 25% of Somalia’s GDP comes from remittance—the money sent from the United States to Somalia—and presents a strategy described as stealing money from American taxpayers, giving Somali residents free housing, free food, free school, and free health care. The claim continues that such a lifestyle would encourage four or five children, while the native-born population struggles to have one or two, leading to demographic shifts that purportedly grant Somali residents more political power to enact legislation beneficial to Somali people. The speaker asserts that money not exclusively for Somalis would be stolen through fraud and that, as money increases, it is sent back to Somalia, stated as their goal. This sequence is linked to a claim that someone spoke about it at an Ilhan Omar rally. The broadcast then references Ilhan Omar, describing her as someone who “openly hates America” and declares allegiance to a foreign country, and shows her at a church berating white people for liking Charlie Kirk, who is portrayed as representing American values. The claim attributes to the speakers a claim that viewers should “Thank you” for hearing this, and to describe those who are interested in rewriting this hateful man’s history as “full of shit.” There is a criticism of the church for allowing her to speak, and a rhetorical question about white liberals loving foreigners and telling them how evil they are for caring about their country. It is asserted that Omar’s plan has succeeded, that Minnesotans have adopted a belief that their purpose is to serve Somalia. The narrative then shifts to Charlie Kirk, described as a man who stood up for America and American values, who is characterized as evil and awful, leading to Omar’s appearance on CNN where she mocks Kirk’s death and says he belongs in the dustbin of history. Finally, Speaker 3 reflects on how many people excuse the most reprehensible things, want monuments for him, a day to honor him, and a resolution to produce.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of dollars in taxpayer money out of the country. Lou Rugoose has a look at the brand new charges today. Speaker 1: The seventy fourth person to be charged in the $300,000,000 feeding our future meal fraud case, Ahmed Naji Sheikh, is the brother of one of the most notorious defendants, Abi Aziz Farah, who was recently sentenced to twenty eight years in prison. Farah was convicted with a group of others of stealing $50,000,000 of taxpayer money. Now his brother Sheikh is accused of helping him launder that money. Speaker 2: Now in any normal country, this would cause a major backlash from the native population. But liberals actually want this. This is the greatest form of social justice. And anyone else who dares to speak out against programs getting robbed that are meant to feed hungry children are silenced and called bigots and racist and intolerant. And when you understand the entire game plan, it starts to make sense. Did you guys know that 25% of Somalia's GDP comes from remittance. Money being sent from The United States to Somalia. So the strategy is to steal money from the American taxpayer. Give Somali residents free housing, free food, free school, free health care. Give them such a comfortable life style that they can afford to have four or five children. While the native born population struggles to have one, two if they're lucky. And then as their population outgrows the native population, they have more political power. And then they can enact legislation that exclusively benefit Somali people and the money that's not exclusively for them, they can just steal it through fraud. And the more money they get, the more they send back to Somalia because that is their goal. You heard the guy say it at the Ilhan Omar rally. But speaking of Ilhan Omar, someone who openly hates America and declares her allegiance for a foreign country, here she is going to a church and berating a bunch of white people for liking Charlie Kirk, a man who stood up for America instead of Somalia. Do believe those of Speaker 1: you who are interested in rewriting this hateful man's history Thank you. Are full of shit. Thank you. Speaker 2: It is despicable that church would allow her to do that. And what's up with white liberals loving foreigners telling them how evil they are for caring about their country? Ilhan Omar knows that their plan has succeeded. They have successfully beat the residents of Minnesota into ideological submission. Minnesotans, I guess, have just adopted the belief that their sole purpose in life is to serve the interests of Somalia. And Charlie Kirk, a man who stood up for America and American values has to be characterized as an evil, awful person. And that's why Ilhan Omar goes on CNN, mocks Charlie Kirk's death, and says he belongs in the dustbin of history. Watch. Speaker 3: What I find jarring is that there's so many people willing to excuse the most reprehensible things that he said, that they agree with that, that they're willing to have monuments for him, that they wanna create a day to honor him, and that they want to produce resolution.
Saved - January 2, 2026 at 5:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that Abdi Daisane, a Somali immigrant running as a Democrat for Minnesota State Representative, owns a Minnesota daycare with alleged DHS violations: no equipment, materials, supervision, or license compliance; missing background checks; unsanitary conditions; no CPR or first-aid kits; no immunization records; insufficient staff; repeated violations. The post asks if this amounts to fraud.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOW 🚨 A Somalian immigrant named Abdi Daisane is running for Minnesota State Representative as a Democrat and you’ll never believe this, he owns a daycare in Minnesota The daycare has “a laundry list” of violations including not complying with DHS requests Violations include - No equipment - No materials - No supplies - No supervision for the kids - Not operating within the terms of their license - Never submitted their DHS background study when requested - Unsanitary conditions - Not complying with CPR regulations - No first aid kits - No furnishings - No documents to show that the teachers were qualified to do the job - No immunization records for any of the children - Not enough staff - Same violations happen over and over and over Sure sounds like fraud doesn’t it….

Video Transcript AI Summary
Abdi, running for Minnesota House District 14A, owns Blooming Kids Child Care. The speaker highlights a long list of alleged violations at Blooming Kids, including: - No first aid kits - Unsanitary conditions - Not complying with CPR regulations - No supervision for the kids - Not operating within the terms of their license - Never submitted their DHS background study when requested - Children subjected to prohibited disciplinary actions - No furnishings, no equipment, no materials, and no supplies - No documents to show that the teachers were qualified to do the job - Repeated violations: same violations happen over and over - No immunization records for any of the children - Not enough staff The speaker notes they cannot determine how much state or federal funding Blooming Kids receives because that information requires access they don’t have. Regarding campaign fundraising, the speaker checked Abdi’s campaign donations and states he is not getting any from any day care centers. The speaker concludes by asking someone to tag Nick Shirley, suggesting he should look into this issue as well.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meet Abdi. He is running for Minnesota House District 14 A, and I bet you'll never guess what type of business Abdi owns. Blooming Kids Child Care. And I did a little research on Blooming Kids, and they have quite the laundry list of violations as well, just like the other ones that we were looking at. And over the years, they've been violated for no first aid kits, unsanitary conditions, not complying with CPR regulations, no supervision for the kids, not operating within the terms of their license. They never submitted their DHS background study when requested. Children were subjected to prohibited disciplinary actions. No furnishings, no equipment, no materials, and no supplies. No documents to show that the teachers were qualified to do the job. Same violations happen over and over and over. No immunization records for any of the children. Not enough staff. So I'm not able to see how much money that this particular day care center is getting from the state or the federal government because that needs to be done by somebody who has access to that information, which I don't. I did look up his campaign fund donations, and he's not getting any from any day care centers. So so if somebody can tag Nick Shirley, let him know that he should probably look into this one too.
Saved - January 2, 2026 at 4:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a Minnesota NGO, 99% state-funded, is accused of election fraud, with alleged collusion among state representatives like Walz and Omar and the Somali community. It claims billions are stolen through fake daycares, plus massive election and voter registration fraud caught on video, with some pleading guilty. It calls this a nationwide criminal enterprise and demands harsher punishments in 2026.

@TheSCIF - The SCIF

Minnesota NGO that is 99% taxpayer funded by state grants caught engaging in ELECTION FRAUD. It goes so much MUCH deeper... Minnesota NGOs and state representatives like Tim Walz and Ilhan Omar are colluding with the Somali community. They're not only stealing BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars through fake daycares, but are also committing MASSIVE ELECTION and VOTER REGISTRATION FRAUD, which was caught on video. Some already pleaded guilty. This is a massive criminal enterprise being run out of the state of Minnesota. Stealing from America and it's taxpaying citizens, to enrich themselves, their own country, and steal elections. These same schemes are happening NATIONWIDE. The punishments need to be more severe than the crimes. It's 2026, this is the year we say, "NO MORE!"

Video Transcript AI Summary
A foundation hired independent contractors to conduct voter registration. Two of the contractors were found guilty. The foundation, whose budget is 99% funded by state grants, did not participate in fraud, but hired people with state dollars who then used that to create fake voter registrations. Project Veritas exposed alleged ballot harvesting by supporters of Democrat representative Ilhan Omar and her allies in Minnesota. They claim paid workers illegally gathered absentee ballots from elderly Somali immigrants, with new video footage showing one operative bragging about collecting hundreds of ballots. The question raised is who is filling out the absentee ballots, with the people who work with Omar and other candidates allegedly working for them. The video notes, “Where do they pay the money? The minute we sign the thing, the election, that's really good thing.” The claim also states this is the brother of one of the city council members in that city. Observers described the report as very surprising and noted that an investigation would need to confirm all allegations. They highlighted concerns about mail-in ballots in a contentious election year and whether ballots arrive at their destination or if voters are influenced on how they fill them out, raising questions about ballot handling. The county attorney said the matter is illegal and that an investigation will proceed. The illegal part is ballot harvesting; portions of it are allowed in certain states where you can have that, but in this state, “you can take up to three for somebody else in.” That was 300. The investigation is ongoing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These people, as news reports flagged, they admitted in some instances that they were paid by the voter registration. So that brings me to the to the point of this foundation. Clearly, they hired people as independent contractors. Two of them were found guilty. This group, I've done a deep dive on their 990s, 99% of their budget comes from state grants. So this is a group that the state is funding and that then went out and did these voter registrations and they participated. The foundation didn't participate in fraud, but they hired people with state dollars who then used that to, create fake voter registration. Speaker 1: This time, the investigative activist group has exposed alleged ballot harvesting by supporters of Democrat representative Ilhan Omar and her allies in Minnesota. Project Veritas claims paid workers have been illegally gathering absentee ballots from elderly Somali immigrants. A new video footage showing one operative bragging about collecting hundreds of ballots. Watch this. Who is the one filling out the absentee ballots? The people who work with, like, and Omar and other candidates work for them. Where do they pay the money? The the minute we sign the thing, the election, that's really good thing. Yeah. So the question raised of of ballot harvesting and understanding what that is in that video, that is the brother of one of the city council members there in that city. Speaker 2: It is a very surprising report that has come out. Obviously, an investigation would need to to confirm all of the allegations here. But when this is happening during such a contentious election year, and we have covered so many stories about the issues surrounding mail in ballots, whether or not they arrive at their specific destination or, again, if you're filling them out at home and you've got some sort of influence as to how you fill them out, you know, a lot of questions arise. Speaker 1: So the county attorney the the county attorney there is, stating this is illegal. They're gonna be investigating. The illegal part about it is ballot harvesting, portions of it are allowed in certain states where you can have in this specific state, you can do it. You can take up to three for somebody else in. That was 300. So the investigation is ongoing.
Saved - January 27, 2026 at 1:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reviewed the claim that Ilhan Omar lists a California winery, eStCru LLC, on her disclosures. It’s said to be valued at $15k in 2023 and $5 million in 2024, yet the winery allegedly doesn’t exist—no phone, no physical site, social media down, a weak site, no wine. It adds that Omar’s third husband, Tim Mynett, was sued by investors for fraud tied to this fake winery, with a Minnesota AG connection and a call for investigation.

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨How did Ilhan Omar make millions from a 100% fake winery? This is insane. We investigated. Check this out… Illhan Omar lists a California winery on her financial disclosures. You can see them below. The winery name is ‘eStCru LLC.’ In 2023 it was valued at $15k. In 2024 it was valued at $5 Million (!!!) This must be a very successful winery to grow that much in value over one year. Except… the winery does not even exist: - No phone line - No physical winery - Social media gone dark - A barely functional ‘website’ - No wine lol What is this?! It gets worse: Omar’s third husband, Tim Mynett, has been accused of defrauding investors through this FAKE winery. He was sued by the investors for millions because it’s all fraudulent. This is on brand. Minnesota AG Keith Ellison previously worked with Mynett, the same AG who has REFUSED to investigate widespread Somali fraud. How does a nonexistent winery jump from $15k to $5 million in one year when the company is a ghost? How can Omar claim this fake company provides her millions in assets? Seems like a cover. Ironically, one of the wine labels they made was literally called ‘The Devil‘s Lie’ The Trump administration and Republicans in Congress MUST investigate this fraud further.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker analyzes Ilhan Omar’s official financial disclosures and advances a narrative that Est Crew LLC (referred to as Est Crew Winery), a Santa Rosa, California winery linked to Omar, is fraudulent and morally problematic. They first cite the 2023 congressional financial disclosure showing Est Crew Winery valued at $15,000, with Omar hardly earning income from it. They then cite the 2024 filing showing the same company valued at $5,000,000, claiming Omar’s income is now sufficient to pay rent and labeling the growth as “incredible” and suspect. The speaker then examines the winery’s public presence to support the claim it is real. They reference Estrero’s social media pages (Facebook and Instagram) with last posts in 2023 and no presence on X (Twitter), suggesting a lack of ongoing activity. They check the official website, which describes Est Crew as “winemakers and memory curators” with a brand portfolio led by unnamed individuals, but note there are no apparent wine sales or activities listed. They visit Google Street View of the winery location and report an empty parking lot, arguing the business is not operational or properly named. Attempts to contact the winery are described: calling the phone number on the webpage results in a busy signal after multiple tries. The speaker then asserts the winery is fake, citing a New York Post claim that Ilhan Omar’s wealth “skyrocketed” from being “one of the poorest members of Congress” to “one of the richest,” with amounts suggesting the winery is fraudulent. They state a lawsuit accusing Tim Minette, Omar’s “third husband, no relation,” of swindling investors and defrauding them, with a connection noted to Keith Ellison (Minnesota’s attorney general who “used to work for him”) and a suggestion that Ellison has not investigated Somali fraud. The speaker concludes that the winery “is not worth $5,000,000” and “doesn’t even exist,” describing the company as fraudulent and demanding investigation. They label the entire enterprise as a lie, though state that it is not a lie for Omar in terms of her financial disclosures, which allegedly list substantial income and net worth tied to this fake winery. The closing phrase refers to the claim that the winery is “the devil’s lie.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just investigated Ilhan Omar's official financial disclosures, and what I found was so dark and criminal, I don't know how she gets out of this without going to jail. Have a look at this. Here's Ilhan Omar's financial disclosure from the congressional record year 2023. I wanna bring your attention to this company right down here, Est Crew LLC. This is a winery in Santa Rosa, California. It's not doing that well. The total value of the winery is listed at $15,000, and Ilhan Omar's barely making any money off of it at all, hardly enough to pay a parking ticket. Okay. That's fine. Nothing really mysterious there. Businesses fail all the time. But go ahead and look at her filing for 2024 and you'll find that Est Crew Winery, the same company in the same location is now worth $5,000,000. That's incredible. Up from 15,000. And now Ilhan Omar is making enough to pay rent. So this must be one of the most successful companies ever. Let's go ahead and check-in on this, winery. You know, maybe we could, maybe we could buy some wine. I like wine. Why not? Let's let's see if we can buy some Estrero winery. Here's Estrero's social media Facebook page. You'll see here that the last post, oh, no, was in 2023. Wasn't this the year that they were supposed to, you know, go really big and make Ilhan Omar millions of dollars? Same thing on their Instagram, and they don't have an x. So let's go ahead and check their official website. What is Est Crew? We are winemakers and memory curators. Okay? West Est Crew Winery, has a bunch of brands that's led by these people, creators of eye catching labels. So, I'm sure I can go and get some of their wine, right? Well, they don't have any activities here. So maybe I could just go to their location and buy some of their wines or maybe give them a call. Let's try and go to their location here. Here. This is the Google Street View of Est Crew Winery. And what you'll find here is an empty parking lot. It doesn't actually look like an operational business. Certainly isn't the same name. So, okay, let's go ahead and give them a call. See if maybe they pick up. Let's go ahead and call the number on the web page. Go ahead and give them a call and find out. Oh, no. User busy. Let's try okay. Well, I've done this, like, 20 times today. Oh, okay. So that so that didn't work. Is there any wine in this wine company? Is there anything about wine? Because I see, like, stuff about events, but, like, what is this exactly? It it don't aren't you supposed to sell wine at your wine company? Where are your wines? Oh, there are no wines. You wanna know why? Because this is a fake company. Rep. Ilhan Omar's husband accused of swindling investors in their California winery. They stole millions from cannabis growers. You can see here, here's the lawsuit right here saying that Tim Minette is Ilhan Omar's third husband, no relation, swindled his investors and defrauded them. How did Minette get this, relationship? Well, the current attorney general of Minnesota, Keith Ellison, used to work for him. Isn't that curious? Keith Ellison, same guy who refuses to look into any of the Somali fraud. So this company was sued for being a fraudulent company. And the New York Post says the exact same thing as the house is now probing the mystery of Ilhan Omar's skyrocketing wealth. They said that Ilhan Omar went from being one of the most one of the poorest members of Congress and worth negative $65,000 to being one of the richest worth 30,000,000. Here's a rare photo of one of their wines that they allegedly made, the devil's lie, but the entire company is actually a lie. It's not a lie to Ilhan Omar though because she's able to list an enormous amount of her income and enormous amount of her net worth to this fake winery. This winery is not worth $5,000,000. The winery doesn't even exist. It's it's fake. It's fraudulent. They need to investigate this right now. This is a lie. And maybe, just maybe, it's the devil's lie.
View Full Interactive Feed