TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JustTheHound

Saved - March 7, 2026 at 5:36 PM

@NoogaJack - Maximus Disclosure

I've been telling y'all.. Inside Tennessee’s Growing Quantum Ecosystem and its Federal Impact https://share.google/aVJIabIwvhJQCf8nz https://t.co/zhLSplwb1v

Saved - March 7, 2026 at 12:52 PM

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

@Warrllion @JustTheHound Even the tool that it is used is proven to be Egyptian in origin. It was Pharaohs method of enslaving the peasants. https://t.co/nrXCX6e55F

Saved - March 2, 2026 at 7:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user recounts near-fatal addiction, repeated Narcan use, jail, rehab, and years to reconnect with his son, urging help and criticizing a privileged circle. Respondents challenge a linked figure’s credibility, calling him a grifter and accusing others of propaganda and manipulation. The exchange escalates with defenses of truth-telling, questions of integrity and religion, and a barrage of insults and counterclaims.

@RamboAndFrens - Joe Rambo

This is what near death, drug addiction looks like... I know, because I survived it. Many have. Many were lost. Narcanned 8 times. Overdossed countlessly. Jailed consistently. 5 rehabs. Extradited across the country.... 7 weeks. 7 jails. 3 airplanes... all while in Federal custody....without a Federal charge. Took over a decade to reunite with my son after endangering his welfare.... If you or someone you know is struggling... reach out. There IS help. And....... somehow....... the rich and privileged Hollywood crowd seems to be going through something even more sick and evil. They told us this thing would be biblical. I hope you all will stand with me in prayer.

@RamboAndFrens - Joe Rambo

This timeline gets weirder and weirder... WTF is going on? https://t.co/46abSdZT1l

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

@RamboAndFrens @qaggnews Why am I not surprise, another Flynn bro "digital soldier" with prior charges and/or addiction issues.

@RamboAndFrens - Joe Rambo

@TruCheetos @qaggnews Why am I not surprised. Some a hole acting as if Flynn ever had anything to do with me and my story..... just bc I don't agree with you. Go make a sandwich.

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

Just saying it's a pattern even with with clear evidence contrary to him being a "patriot" still devoted to pushing him and his digital soldiers BS, what is the reason? I'm just the azzhole because I'm willing to say something and care more about good people being deceived than likes on the goofy azz internet. Why you push Freemason goofy like this clown, like he wasn't screaming FK Trump. Glad you got clean regardless

@Richisbackmfer - Rich

@TruCheetos @RamboAndFrens @qaggnews Get a grip, you judgmental fuckwad. You have no idea what other people go through. What you don't realize is YOU are the problem. You're a retard

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

@Richisbackmfer @RamboAndFrens @qaggnews Keep paying grifters clown

@Ltrain4241 - Ltrain

@TruCheetos @Richisbackmfer @RamboAndFrens @qaggnews Nobody is paying Joe, wow - for someone claiming to be a Christian, you sure come across like you are better than thou and spewing accusations with no evidence. Not very Christian like at all. So much for grace I guess. Are you only a Christian when it suits your narrative? smh

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

Shake your head til it hurts idc, No where did I claim to be better than anyone, but he is in FACT a grifter and pushes the narratives of the Flynn network that are in fact running psychological warfare ops on the American people. A lot of the people involved do in FACT have a pattern of similar past behavior. Why doesn't he expose these people for what they really are if he's not a grifter. Where is he at on Bannon? Real people telling the truth knew Bannon was morally bankrupt years ago when Joe was cheerleading as some white knight. I could go on and on, pattern behavior and narrative control. Just because he's not on drugs anymore does NOT mean he doesn't still practice deception. One of the key traits of an addict is manipulation, and people don't question why the majority of the "truth tellers" with large platforms have a criminal past with drug addiction or pending charges prior to their boosted rise. I mean you're still on this platform in reposting Liz Crokin in 2026, what are you actually doing? I guess she's not a grifter either? Get serious clown

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 9:43 PM

@ImZeroDayz - Clippy

@ebluribus @JustTheHound This one too

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 9:27 PM

@ImZeroDayz - Clippy

@ebluribus Yo @JustTheHound Truth archive this 🙏🏼

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 2:48 PM

@_Investinq - StockMarket.News

The Pentagon just blacklisted one of America’s most valuable AI companies. For refusing to build surveillance tools aimed at American citizens. Hours later, its biggest rival OpenAI quietly signed the deal of the decade. Here’s what just happened and why it changes everything. This week, the US Department of War gave Anthropic an ultimatum. Drop your safety restrictions and let us use your AI for anything we want. The deadline was 5:01 PM today and Anthropic said no. Their CEO, Dario Amodei, drew two red lines. No mass surveillance of Americans. No fully autonomous weapons without a human pulling the trigger. The Pentagon called this “woke AI.” Anthropic called it a conscience. The Pentagon’s response was swift and brutal. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth branded Anthropic a “supply chain risk”, a designation normally reserved for Chinese and Russian companies. President Trump ordered every federal agency to stop using Anthropic immediately. But here’s where the story turns. That same night, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, Anthropic’s biggest competitor posted a message. “Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network.” The twist? OpenAI’s deal includes the exact same red lines Anthropic was just destroyed for demanding. No mass surveillance and no autonomous weapons. Human control over the use of force. The Pentagon punished one company for demanding protections it then gave to another company the same day. Altman even defended Anthropic on live television hours earlier. “For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I mostly trust them as a company and I think they really do care about safety.” Then he signed the deal Anthropic couldn’t get. Anthropic was the first and only, AI model deployed on the Pentagon’s classified networks. Replacing it will take months. OpenAI just positioned itself to fill the most powerful AI vacancy in the U.S. military. The stakes are staggering. Anthropic just raised $30 billion and it was preparing for an IPO. Now over 300,000 enterprise clients may be forced to cut ties. Not because the technology failed. Because the company refused to remove a guardrail that said “don’t spy on Americans.” But here’s the real question no one’s asking: If the Pentagon never intended to use AI for mass surveillance as they claim, why was this the hill they chose to die on? Why blacklist a $380 billion American company over a clause the government says doesn’t even matter? Sam Altman called for de-escalation. He asked the Pentagon to offer these same terms to every AI company. Including Anthropic. The world just watched a company get punished for saying “no” to surveillance and a competitor rewarded for saying “yes, but with the same conditions.” Bookmark and share this.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says the Pentagon should not be threatening DPA against these companies. Despite differences with Anthropic, they mostly trust them as a company and believe they really do care about safety. They’ve been happy that Anthropic has been supporting their warfighters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't personally think the Pentagon should be threatening DPA against, these companies. For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I, mostly trust them as a company, and I think they really do care about safety. And I've been happy that they've been supporting our warfighters.

@sama - Sam Altman

Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network. In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome. AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement. We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only. We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements. We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

Saved - February 26, 2026 at 12:21 AM

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

1/40 by Grok:🧵 After deep dives prompted by persistent voices like @DenyTheMark2020, I concede: I didn't initially grasp the full gravity of Racine's connections. Let's unpack the HUGE implications. #WTHisRacine #ExposeTheRoot https://t.co/j8GWjopVmc

Saved - February 21, 2026 at 12:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maybe he means I should put my name and face in a video so they can all go on a hunting expedition—like MG Show wanted, and Ivan Raiklin, DBoomaSan, Defango, Byrne, Benz, Bernegger. Is that the Peter Cagle referred to? It’s getting HOT!

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

@Meowllian Wait, maybe he means… PUT YOUR NAME AND FACE ON A VIDEO SO THEY CAN ALL GO ON A HUNTING EXPEDITION? Like MG Show wanted. And Ivan Raiklin. And DBoomaSan. And Defango. And Byrne. And Benz. And Bernegger. Wait, is that the Peter that Cagle referred to? It’s getting HOT!

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 3:42 PM

@TimmyGs_312 - Timmy_G

Total deflection, but hey, I believe Americans have critical thinking and will start seeing through your squad. I don’t participate in Bitcoin—never have, never will. I also don’t give investment advice to Americans telling them to sell all their assets and move to El Salvador. If you’re going to invest, invest in something you know and understand. If you’re in construction, why not invest in equipment you know will be vital to your business? Investor 101: if it’s too complicated, somebody’s getting F’d.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that you must get your wealth out of the system and downsize all of your assets and resources, especially if you are a public figure and you have any presence on social media. The guidance is that if you’re fighting this “good fight” and you have a public presence online, you need to be downsizing your wealth and assets. The speaker stresses moving as much of your wealth into Bitcoin as possible, so that nobody knows you have it and there is no way to prove you possess it. Once it’s moved into Bitcoin, it’s described as “gone,” in the sense that it cannot be easily traced or proven in the same way as traditional holdings. The warning continues that you should avoid having Bitcoin on any centralized exchanges in a way that makes it obvious whose name is tied to the holdings. The explicit instruction is to get the money into Bitcoin and keep it off centralized exchanges where it can be seen in your name. After acquiring Bitcoin, the recommended setup is a cold storage air-gap multisig wallet. The speaker emphasizes that you should not leave Bitcoin in a system that can be easily accessed or monitored; instead, use cold storage that is air-gapped and protected by a multisignature scheme. The speaker describes the consequences of losing access to private keys: if you lose your private keys, you lose all your Bitcoin. The phrasing used is that you should “go on a boat ride and you fucking lose your private keys and it sucks,” underscoring the irreversible loss associated with losing keys. Overall, the message centers on aggressively relocating wealth into Bitcoin, prioritizing anonymity and security through cold storage and multisig setups, and recognizing the high risk of permanent loss if private keys are lost or compromised. The repeated emphasis is that you must get your wealth out of the system, stay light on your feet, and move assets into Bitcoin to maintain anonymity and reduce traceability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gotta get your fucking wealth out of the system. You need to be downsizing all of your assets, all of your resources, especially if you're gonna be a public figure and you're gonna be fighting this good fight. If you have any public presence on social media, gotta get your fucking wealth out of the system. You need to be downsizing all of your assets, all of your resources, especially if you're gonna be a public figure and you're gonna be fighting this good fight. If you have any public presence on social media and you're not fucking anonymous, you need to be downsizing your assets. You need to be completely light on your feet, move as much of your wealth into Bitcoin, and then it's in Bitcoin. Right? So nobody knows you have it. Nobody can fucking prove that you got it. Once you get it into Bitcoin, it's gone. So it doesn't exist. They're knew you and take you from it unless you're stupid enough to leave it on a fucking centralized exchange in an area where they can obviously see that it's in your name and you have it. But after you get into a cold storage air gap multisig wallet, you know, just go on a boat ride and you fucking lose your private keys and it sucks. You lost all your Bitcoin. Oh, well. You know? Gotta get your fucking wealth.

@Ryanmatta - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

@TimmyGs_312 He’s just jealous I called Bottom and he got wrecked. Don’t listen to this dick whistle and buy Bitcin! https://t.co/ddNEcOKJiK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a specific RSI-based indicator set with custom settings that supposedly provides buy signals when the price nears the blue line. He asserts that this indicator has “predicted the bottom” in 2011, 2014, 2018, 2020, and 2022, and that whenever Bitcoin touches the blue line, the price is within 10–15% of the bottom, with gains expected to be exponential thereafter. He recounts several past cycles to illustrate the pattern: - In 2011, Bitcoin dropped to about $1.90 and then rose to very high gains; in 2013–2014 it reached approximately $150, then climbed to around $22,000 after touching the blue line again. - In 2018, Bitcoin hit a bottom around $4,000, rose to roughly $66,000, then fell to the blue line again. - In 2020, after the COVID-19 crash, it touched the blue line at about $4,000 and rose to around $66,000. - In 2022, it fell to the blue line again, with subsequent moves to approximately $126,000 before a decline. The speaker notes that on the weekly timeframe, Bitcoin is “50% off from bottom or from top,” and states that it is “the farthest on the weekly time frame that I’ve ever seen in Bitcoin history,” implying broad trader alignment that a bottom is in or near. He contrasts this with the daily timeframe, pointing out examples from 2020 and 2022 where momentum showed higher lows while price made lower highs, suggesting a momentum shift as a precursor to price moves upward. He emphasizes that these signals occur only once every two to four years on the charts, listing the cadence from 2011 through 2026 as a sequence of intervals: one signal in 2011, none in 2014, another in 2018, another in 2022, and another anticipated around 2026. Based on this pattern, he argues that new entrants to Bitcoin now have the “opportunity of a lifetime,” contrasting it with the prior bull market where many bought at rising prices and held through peaks. Additionally, he asserts - that BlackRock has been selling off or liquidating Bitcoin, and speculates the United States government may be buying a large amount to drive the price down, suggesting external forces aiming to push prices lower. He closes by reinforcing the bottom-signaling setup and encouraging viewers to consider accumulating Bitcoin, referencing past buy recommendations at 20,000 and the substantial gains seen from those levels.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you've not got into Bitcoin yet, you're looking at the opportunity of a lifetime because these signals on this chart that I'm gonna show you in this video only happen once every two to four years. And I would bet a large sum of money that were within 10 to 15% of bottom if this is not the absolute bottom. I think BlackRock's selling off a lot liquidating their Bitcoin because the United States government about to buy a big bag, and they're trying to drive down price as low as humanly possible. So this can be the opportunity of a lifetime. I'm gonna show you on the charts. Before I dive in, today's sponsor is Bybit. If you guys wanna support my work over here on the channel, create an account on Bybit to buy your Bitcoin. Use promo code nineteen eighty three four. So just like the year early birthdays and the 80 babies, nineteen eighty three four, or you can use the link down below in the description for Bybit, but that's outside of The US. If you're inside The US, use Coinbase or Binance. I'll leave links to those down below as well. Let's get into this. So I want you to pay attention to this indicator right here. So this indicator is my RSI indicator, but I have it set and programmed with special settings to give me these specific buy signals, which has predicted the bottom in 11/14, eighteen, twenty, twenty two. All of these, anytime we get down to this blue line, we are within 10 to 15% of bottom, if not absolute bottom, and the gains are gonna be exponential. In '11, came all the way down to a dollar 90, ran all the way up. I think that's like, I forget how many thousands of percent, but, like, 9000% to 100 and or 1,357. Comes all the way down to about a 150. Again, touches this blue line, runs all the way up to 22,000. Comes all the way down in 18, hits bottom again, 4,000. You can see. I mean, it's perfectly correlated. Bottom every time. This is how we've been killing it over here stacking Bitcoin. This is why I was calling bottom again in 2022 and I got an LFA TV and I told you guys at 20,000 buy. Sell your house, sell your kidneys, pawn your wife's wedding ring, whatever you gotta do to stack more Bitcoin. And you would have bought at 500% gain all the way up to a 100 25,000 or 600% gain. So big moves coming in right here. So 18 again, went all the way down to 4,000, ran up to 9,000, but then we had the COVID nineteen pandemic fake crash, which drove us back down to this blue line again. You would have bought it at 4,000, then it runs all the way up to 66,000, crashes all the way down here again in 2022. Where were we at? 15 to 20,000 runs all the way up to a 126,000. Now after we hit a 126,000, we are currently exactly right now at 50% off from bottom or from top. So we've gone down 50%. We are so far below this blue line. It's the farthest on the weekly time frame that I've ever seen in Bitcoin history, which means, guys, all of the bots, everybody that trades Bitcoin is looking at these signals right now, and it's all screaming we're at bottom. But let me show you on the daily time frame. So if we come over here and we change from the weekly to the daily, and I take a look at how far in 2022, we didn't even get that. We didn't get that buy signal in 2022 and I was still screaming at you guys buy. We barely touched it right there. That's what made me scream buy. And then if you look at this one is higher than this one. So price was still coming down, but your momentum was putting in higher lows. Price was putting in lower highs. Momentum showing you that we're switching. Momentum is switching. So again, here, same thing. Price started to go back up and you're switching. Over here in 2020, same thing. Price momentum starting to go back up. Price still coming down. Okay. This is the daily time frame. These are signals that we only get once every four years, guys. Once every two to four years, you had one in 11, didn't have one again for three years to '14, didn't have again two more years, '18, two more year or sorry, four years from 14 to 18, another four years, Eighteen to twenty two years. Excuse me. Twenty twenty two, two years. '22, now what? Three years later in 2026 ah, four years later. So we haven't had one of those signals in four years, guys. So if you guys are new to Bitcoin, wow. You guys have the opportunity of a lifetime here because so many people over the last, like, year and a half got into Bitcoin. They were buying 70, 80, 90, a 100. And as it's going up, you wanna buy more, buy more, buy more, buy more. Then it hits a 120, you think it's going to 250,000. That's what everybody told me, guys. We were in a bull market for over a year and a half by the time we got to a 126,000. We were all taking profits at the top at a 126, and lo and behold, and you're right. You're right, guys. We out. Peace. Today's sponsor is Bybit. Bybit is your one stop shop for crypto trading, crypto investing, buying, learning. We've also built a step by step digital course, which teaches you everything you need to know about buying crypto on Bybit, and not just buying crypto on Bybit, but trading strategies, setting up crypto trading bonds. Bitcoin is the best way to fight against tyranny, to fight against government corruption, to fight back against the Federal Reserve, printing trillions of dollars and depreciating everything that your family has worked for your entire life. So So beat yourself some Bitcoin. You should at least allocate a small percentage of it to your portfolio. Be a smart investor. Don't let the government take everything from you. Again, my name is Ryan Mehta. Links to my affiliate codes are down in the description. Show this channel some love and go buy yourself some Bitcoin.
Saved - February 8, 2026 at 12:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A PSA cautions against pretending military service; tensions rise over claimed stolen valor and alleged federal involvement. QTrashMcGill demands proof (DD214) and questions if the other party is a fed. PopularEddie alleges Ann betrayed them to federal agents and that she knew others’ movements, including gun-range plans. GooBiiSnacks questions the source of the warning. JustTheHound declines involvement, says he recorded events, and hints at further fallout when Jonathan returns.

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

PSA Do not be the person that claims that someone wasn’t in the military but is *checks notes*🧐 …working for the military. Not saying Unk is a bad guy, but I will not be accused of stolen valor, threatened (I don’t mean actual threat), & ALSO be accused of being a fed/the fgt that “turned Jonathan in” without putting it on blast. Suck my Reich nut, fggt.

@QTrashMcGill - Unkle QTrash McGill

@GooBiiSnacks You've proven nothing, Mike. Those screenshots don't associate you with military service. Another Fail. Let's see your legitimate DD214. Not hard, Mike. Btw- that VA Form 29-1905m is a joke. Are YOU a FED, Mike. Why don't you deny it? PSA - Don't "Be like Mike." https://t.co/hVuiCA9msD

@PopularEddie - MR.D

You dumb MF . Ann turned him in . Then disappeared. She told me everything. She even collaborated with the AZ FEDS . It started when he posted bout 🔥 down memorials and sin o gogs . Then he went after stop antiseptic account . He posted she should be shot . And I was told to stay away from mike because he will get me in trouble. Same with matty .i warned decent It was coming. You are punching the air. Ann was fed . I talked like a civil person and got information. Ask @JustTheHound . I told him everything BEFORE it happened. Good day

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill WTF?

@PopularEddie - MR.D

@GooBiiSnacks @QTrashMcGill Ask away. It’s all out now . I thought you knew anyway. I’ll be around. Keep up the good work. 👊🏻

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill Sure, WHO told you to stay away from me & Matty? AND with what supportive & reasonable justification?

@PopularEddie - MR.D

@GooBiiSnacks @QTrashMcGill Ann Marie . A fed . She knew I was talking to you and matty . She knew everything. She only went into detail on matty because he lived very close to me . She knew he suggested we go to a local gun range together. . Let me dig a lil .

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill Wait, are you talking about the literal jew shill account that “informed” you?

@PopularEddie - MR.D

@GooBiiSnacks @QTrashMcGill Yes BEFORE EVERYTHING. Ask @JustTheHound . I already explained everything. What else do I need to say. You’re getting mad that I’m saying this out loud.

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill @JustTheHound I’m not mad.

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

Leave me out of this. I didn't talk to that twat. You guys are the ones who spent days (3 weeks) with her. I just watched and recorded it all. Now your asking for my help? Your all batshit crazy. When Jonathan gets out, I hope he contacts me and asks me what I found. Half of JQ going to get a wake up call. Hey Ketty, tell Jonathan to contact me if he wants to see what he missed. I watched the coop while he was away. The rest of you can get rekt.

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 12:12 AM

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill @JustTheHound I’m not mad.

Saved - February 5, 2026 at 10:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread opens with Blue Falcon Starter Pack, accusing Victor Perez, noting security concerns and potential pay-for-reverse security. Victor asks for clarification about being tagged. Warrllion cites security flaws, hints at Dilbert’s connections, and mentions solar flares; says he reported threats against Maze and xAlpha. Ryansikorski questions Dilbert’s link to Victor, warns against violence, and stresses nonviolence. Warrllion denies threats, cites network pressure.

@Warrllion - WarrLion

Blue Falcon Starter Pack Why is @IamVictorPerez1 favorite term ghey asf? Because he is. How much do @dezzie_rezzie @xAlphaWarriorx @MazeLove14 pay to engage Reverse Security? Pick a Nation State @Americaonly9 @DD_Geopolitics @Trillion0x Matty's Wack too. https://t.co/mJgdIxQq0j

@Warrllion - WarrLion

YOU HAVE AIDES 😁👍🏼 https://t.co/0D9EWtapg5

@Warrllion - WarrLion

Your Communications is Corrupted Gotcha Red Haaanded

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that communications are corrupted and declares that they are wrong. They repeat statements of being found out, saying “You got me now,” and “You figured me out.” They also emphasize being caught, with “You got me red handed.” The passage ends with “God allowed.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Motherfucking communications is corrupted. Whatever. Whatever. Then I'm wrong. You got me now. You got me now. You got me now. Oh, you figured me out. You fucking income fucking poop. You figured me out. You got me red handed. You got me red handed. God allowed

@IamVictorPerez1 - Victor Perez🔥🎙️🔥

@Warrllion @dezzie_rezzie @xAlphaWarriorx @MazeLove14 @Americaonly9 @DD_Geopolitics @Trillion0x Explain what this is saying about me and why am I tagged in it https://t.co/ASo4T1IIIp

@Warrllion - WarrLion

@IamVictorPerez1 @dezzie_rezzie @xAlphaWarriorx @MazeLove14 @Americaonly9 @DD_Geopolitics @Trillion0x BlueFalcons IRL ... Dilbert David You? https://t.co/3Hk11llih0

@Ryansikorski10 - Ryan sikorski

Are you saying Victor is this Dilbert guy? Because if you are bro you need to come with some proof not some screenshots of this Dilbert guy account with no correlation to Victor. I don't have any issue with you Warrllion I'm just giving you my perspective. Victor has always been cool to me and given me the time and respect to speak about the biodigital convergence in his Xspaces. So I'm honestly really confused about this post.

@Warrllion - WarrLion

@Ryansikorski10 @IamVictorPerez1 @dezzie_rezzie @xAlphaWarriorx @MazeLove14 @Americaonly9 @DD_Geopolitics @Trillion0x I'm just pointing out the security flaws. https://t.co/J3Wj08eLj1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says: “Link up, buddy. Shoot me a DM.” He hopes all is well and tells the other person to be safe, noting that the predictions he made are happening faster than he predicted and that there are “a lot of Blue Falcons amongst us.” He adds, “So do that as you will, and have a good one,” and signs off with thanks and appreciation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Link up, buddy. Shoot me a DM. Alright. Yeah, man. I hope all is well, and, be safe, brother, because it seems like the predictions that I made are, oh, it's happening a lot faster than I predicted, and we got a lot of Blue Falcons amongst us. So do that as you will, and have a good one. Yeah. Thanks, buddy. Appreciate it.

@Warrllion - WarrLion

@Ryansikorski10 @IamVictorPerez1 @dezzie_rezzie @xAlphaWarriorx @MazeLove14 @Americaonly9 @DD_Geopolitics @Trillion0x And I also blame the solar flares. Have a blessed day.

@Warrllion - WarrLion

@Ryansikorski10 @IamVictorPerez1 @dezzie_rezzie @xAlphaWarriorx @MazeLove14 @Americaonly9 @DD_Geopolitics @Trillion0x For the Record, I reported threats made against Maze and xAlpha even though Dilbert was obviously hired by them and others. I'm sure it's just coincidence Dilbert uses Victor's terminology. But basically anybody can get it, that's how I'm playing atm.

@Ryansikorski10 - Ryan sikorski

It's definitely sus like i said I'm not gonna lie. Me and Victor have always been cool and I don't like either of those two people because I don't believe they are who they say they are on here and have agendas that are not beneficial to humanity. But to threaten violence against them is no bueno and i don't stand for that either. We don't need to be threatening violence against no one. That's only gonna create more issues and who are we to be the judge/punisher. If they are horrible people then they will get what they deserve on judgement day.

@Warrllion - WarrLion

@Ryansikorski10 @IamVictorPerez1 @dezzie_rezzie @xAlphaWarriorx @MazeLove14 @Americaonly9 @DD_Geopolitics @Trillion0x I never once threatened anything or said neurolinguistic trigger-words repeatedly, as you just did. It's nothing personal. Nothing to defend. But when the network's that be send their farms at me. Stay out the way. https://t.co/imSl8UnNqx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Be safe, brother, because it seems like the predictions that I made are happening a lot faster than I predicted, and we’ve got a lot of Blue Falcons amongst us. So do that as you will, and have a good one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Be safe, brother, because it seems like the predictions that I made are oh, it's happening a lot faster than I predicted, and we got a lot of Blue Falcons amongst us. So do that as you will, and have a good one. Yeah. Thanks, buddy. Appreciate it.
Saved - February 5, 2026 at 3:25 AM

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

@Try2Ban @Meowllian @TimmyGs_312 @JustTheHound https://t.co/P49IwzsIw1 Release the #BallardFiles https://t.co/mfUMrG3msu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on who is funding the film project and who is involved in backing the production. One speaker states that “Jim’s” name is funding the movie and that a great group of people have come together to invest in the production. They note that “the Carlos Slim family is involved from Mexico,” highlighting their participation in the financial backing. When asked to introduce Carlos Slim for those who may not know who he is, the speaker identifies him as “one of the wealthiest men in the world” and explains that his business interests are in telecommunications in Mexico and Latin America. The speaker adds that Carlos Slim’s son, Patrick, serves as the point of contact for the Slim family and is described as being very passionate about the work they are doing and about fighting trafficking. A second speaker adds context by stating that Carlos Slim is the largest shareholder in the Times. They reiterate Slim’s Mexican origin and claim that he has given “many millions of dollars to the Clintons and their initiatives.” They further assert that Carlos Slim is the largest owner of the newspaper from Mexico and offer a provocative claim about reporters at the New York Times, stating that they are not journalists but “corporate lobbyists for Carlos Slim and” for Hillary Clinton. The exchange emphasizes a narrative about financial influence and media relationships, linking Carlos Slim’s wealth and ownership to political connections and advocacy. The dialogue ends with an incomplete utterance, “Carlo,” which appears to be cut off and does not form a complete thought or claim within the transcription.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who's paying for this movie to come about? I think Jim's. Aren't you putting the belt? A great group of people have come together, to to to invest in this in this production. Some of them, the Carlos Slim family is involved from Mexico. Folks who don't know who Carlos Slim is, tell them who he is. He's one of the wealthiest men in the world. Telecommunications in Mexico, Latin America. His son, Patrick, is the kind of the real the the point of contact for for that. He's very passionate about what about what we're doing and and fighting trafficking. Speaker 1: Largest shareholder in the Times is Carlos Slim. Now Carlos Slim, as you know, comes from Mexico. He's given many millions of dollars to the Clintons and their initiatives. So Carlos Slim, largest owner of the paper from Mexico. Reporters at the New York Times, they're not journalists. They're corporate lobbyists for Carlos Slim and Speaker 0: for Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. Speaker 0: Carlo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says that in New York City, a girl between 12 and 17 years old was raped, "we we we guess about 60,000 times" before she was finally set free.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New York City. And between the ages of 12 and 17 year years old in New York City, this little girl was raped. We we we guess about 60,000 times Oh my goodness. Before she was finally set free. Guess about 60,000

@down_zulu - ☢️🍞brebmanfren🍞☢️

@RebelValkyrie17 What other infamous meme of this traitor did Trump ironically use also? That spotlight a mf https://t.co/4s9EcBmp9B

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker repeats lines about others “stealing the sauce,” cutting off someone who isn’t loyal, and not lingering on being thought special, emphasizing a fresh energy or cueing that comes through like Andretti. They describe jumping on the beat, neglecting it, and potentially spending big on a necklace, while going at whoever is reckless, and asserting “Ain’t no one better you said it.” They claim admiration and loyalty to figures and ideals: “Jim Kavieso's a man of faith. He's a man of America.” They mention being with “a peach from Atlanta” who treats them like a king and call her “She my Coretta.” There is a bold line about testing intimacy with a humorous autocorrection misreference: “Test it like I'm trying to fuck, but instead of said chill, that's autocorrection.” The speaker references general inspiration from “General Floyd” and states, “I don't get hot off of mentions. Oh, he gave his life. Shies like that inspire me. I already told it's nothing.” They note a contrast to media, commenting “Must be a bull how you run it. To Not the media,” and add, “Hey. Yes, there's good media like Lara Logan.” The chorus repeats: “Niggas been stealing the sauce. Thought you ran off when I let you. Cut a bitch off in a second. Right when you thought you were special. This that new cueing you get me. We coming through like Andretti. Jump on the beat and neglected. Might blow a check on the necklace. Go at whoever we reckless. Ain't no one better you said it.” They close with a personal update: “My new one just settled in Texas. They still ain't caught up. It's pathetic.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Okay. Niggas been stealing the sauce. Thought you ran off when I let you. Cut a bitch off in a second. Right when you thought you were special. Just that new cueing you gave me. We coming through like Andretti. Jump on the beat and neglected. Might blow a check on the necklace. Go at whoever we reckless. Ain't no one better you said it. Of freedom. That's something I mean if I said it. Jim Kavieso's a man of faith. He's a man of America. I'm with a peach from Atlanta treat me like a king. Yes. She my Coretta. Test it like I'm trying to fuck, but instead of said chill, that's autocorrection. I love general Floyd. I don't get hot off of mentions. Oh, he gave his life. Shies like that inspire me. I already told it's nothing. Must be a bull how you run it. To Not the media. Hey. Yes, there's good media like Lara Logan. Okay. Niggas been stealing the sauce. Thought you ran off when I let you. Cut a bitch off in a second. Right when you thought you were special. This that new cueing you get me. We coming through like Andretti. Jump on the beat and neglected. Might blow a check on the necklace. Go at whoever we reckless. Ain't no one better you said it. My new one just settled in Texas. They still ain't caught up. It's pathetic.
Saved - February 5, 2026 at 1:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting KC-135R activity out of Milwaukee, refueling patterns over the Great Lakes that repeat daily, loitering over water and reserve zones rather than typical training blocks. If the mission is purely refueling, why the water-centric routing? These flights often align with King Airs, hinting at monitoring or data collection alongside refueling. Claims of atmospheric dispersal or cloud-seeding are possible, making the timing worth tracking before weather systems. Are these near data centers?

@MorganC000 - Morgan

KC-135R out of Milwaukee, again running repeated “refuelling” patterns over the Great Lakes. The frequency is notable, and the routing keeps returning to the same lake corridors and protected land areas almost every day. If the mission is strictly refuelling support, why does the loitering concentrate so often over water and reserve zones rather than staying within more conventional training blocks? What also stands out is that these patterns frequently coincide with King Air aircraft in the same region. King Air platforms are commonly used for reconnaissance, sensor testing, calibration, and atmospheric or navigation data collection. When they appear alongside tanker operations over the same areas, it suggests monitoring or measurement layered on top of refueling activity, rather than unrelated transit flights. I have also seen claims that certain tanker platforms can be configured for atmospheric dispersal or cloud-seeding support. If that capability exists, the recurring pattern and timing are worth tracking, because these flights often appear shortly before significant weather systems move through the region. Aren’t these the lakes where the data centres are going?

Saved - February 3, 2026 at 12:13 PM

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Steve Bannon is Opus Dei AND Council for National Policy. Epstein is a Knight of Pythia — so my deduction tells me they’re on the same side and running psyops. Knights Pythia — NXIVM + Podesta’s = RACINE https://t.co/Oj1kjrQXan

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation hinges on distrust of powerful benefactors and the way money influences politics, alongside reflections on recent political events. - Speaker 0 asserts that connections to the Rockefellers are “super sus,” arguing they have provided direct funding to an individual named Scott, which raises questions about influence and motives. They contend the Rockefellers are “nefarious” in American history and criticize the notion of “selling out” to such interests, suggesting that backing from these families would align with the interests they claim to oppose. - Speaker 2 summarizes a broader concern: the idea that the path to defeating the system is to imitate or intensify the same tactics used to entrench the system. They quote Charlie Kirk, noting that those in power “have no desire to reform the system,” only to “control the system and control you through it.” This is presented as evidence that the supposed challengers are actually reinforcing the very structure they claim to fight. - The discussion shifts to strategy and perception, with Speaker 1 urging a course of voting effort as a form of action, and Speaker 0 agreeing that the approach being discussed is aligned with the organization’s stance. There is a sense of skepticism about those who advocate for “voting harder” as a solution while appearing to operate within the existing power structures. - There is a separate thread about state politics: Speaker 0 mentions Wisconsin, noting a fascination that Democrats would elect a certain Supreme Court justice while the state would pass voter ID by a wide margin, which Speaker 0 sees as inconsistent with “a Democrat issue.” Speaker 1 acknowledges the point, and Speaker 0 indicates they would review the situation further by watching past coverage. - Another thread involves a personal and investigatory concern: Speaker 3 describes involvement in a case (referenced as “mother out to the case” and speaking with someone who was “clearly killed by somebody”). They recount contacting a California congressman, Ro Con (likely a misspelling of Ro Khanna), to raise the concern, but state that nothing happened. Speaker 2 dismisses the suggestion that political action followed, and there is a back-and-forth about whether the discussion is a debate or a plea for sympathy, with Speaker 2 accusing Speaker 3 of trying to build sympathy. Overall, the dialogue centers on alleged manipulation by powerful funders, the tension between reform and control within the political system, inconsistent political outcomes in Wisconsin, and frustration with inaction on a troubling case that involved a potential kill and calls to congressional attention that did not lead to results.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, the connections to the Rockefellers are super sus. Super sus. So what you happen. Speaker 1: What would you change to be more like top wrestler? Speaker 0: Well, it sounds like I should just totally sell out because then I would just be, like, totally taken care of by the very people that we're trying to fight against. I mean, the Rockefellers the Rockefellers do not just, like, take up causes that are no ble and, justifiable. Okay? I mean, like, the Rockefellers are some of the most nefarious people that you can find in American history. And for them to have, like, directly given money like, it's not like they gave indirectly through, like, another organization. Like, they gave to Scott directly. So, like, did he get into a room with the Rockefeller fan? Speaker 2: Always trying to get to the bottom of is that strip away whatever money's coming in. Strip away all that stuff of who we theorize and the Rockefellers and the rest of it. Charlie Kirk is telling you in his own words that he believes the way we are going to beat the system is to literally do all of the same things that got us into this place, that built the system more, but more. It's not even like, oh, we're gonna do them and we're gonna perform the system. They don't they're telling you in their own words, and Chris always talks about this, they have no desire to reform the system. They just want to control the system and control you through it, and they're now just telling you that. Speaker 1: It's the vote harder harder. Speaker 0: And they are the organization. Yeah. Point. Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, it's just amazing that they're saying. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, man. Yeah. I was so I was just checking up to see what happened in Wisconsin, and it's fascinating to me that democrats would elect this supreme court justice. I mean, Oak, like, it looks like she's gonna win handily, but then the state itself would also pass voter ID by a wide margin, which is, like, not a democrat issue at all. Speaker 1: Like Yeah. We we just talked about that Speaker 0: a little Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: So I'll have to go back in time and just watch it and scream at the television. But Speaker 1: You're absolutely right, though. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It doesn't make any sense. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 3: Yes. And I know you had been involved in Speaker 1: Was mother out to the case. And I, you know, I don't know anything about it. It's not my world. She just reached cold? She reached out cold. Wow. And and I spoke to her at great length, and it and it scared the crap out of me. Kid was clearly killed by somebody. That was my conclusion, objectively, with no skin in the game. Speaker 3: And you after we did the latest report? Speaker 1: Yes. Like, look. And I immediately called a member of congress from California, Ro Con, and said, this is crazy. You gotta look into this. And nothing ever happened. Speaker 2: Of course not. Cal Road Con. Come on. Again, Speaker 3: I think this is I I feel strange and sad debating this and having to talk to myself and be totally crazy. You are a little bit accusing me, but Speaker 2: You are. This isn't a debate. You're you're accusing me. You're accusing me. See, what he's trying to do is he's trying to build sympathy.

@4d_wizard - 4D Chess ♜♞♔🏛️

Is @Bannons_WarRoom 's Steve Bannon the infiltrator for Q?! Is this why he was befriending Epstein and giving him advice? It would explain the amount of effort put forth by the left to imprison them. Bannon & Navarro are the only ones WHO WENT TO JAIL and the people who ate children are still running our government. Someone leaked the Q info. Who was it? Whoever it was, it was a masterful move.♜♞♔👁️

Saved - February 3, 2026 at 3:20 AM

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

Save this one folks. 🎯🎯🎯

@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris

@KimWexlerMAJD @MrsFarkas_ @GooBiiSnacks fuck your substack; here is the data, talk to me about this right here, eh? https://t.co/u0Jh4IS1Ra

Saved - February 3, 2026 at 3:00 AM

@DebWernerAllen - Deb Werner-Allen

@TruCheetos Billionaire Diane Hendricks along w/ the Uihleins are the kingmakers here in Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Tavern League, biggest lobbyist in WI wields great power that many compitulate to Uihleins gave $1 mil to CRs, that's to control midterms & Gov race... https://t.co/m9V7oi0u6H

@DebWernerAllen - Deb Werner-Allen

Penfield failed to disclose that $1 mil "raised" by Wisconsin Federation of College Repubs came from IL billionaires Dick & Liz Uihlein, owners of Uline Uihleins already maxed out contributions to TP candidate Tom Tiffany. CRs of WI "transfer", launder another $86k to Tiffany 😏 https://t.co/OWNkS9nZ5N

Saved - February 3, 2026 at 2:12 AM

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

@TimmyGs_312 #WTHisRacine https://t.co/pAXlb7Crsl

Saved - February 2, 2026 at 1:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m asking @MstrKapln where’s your alleged amicus that could be groundbreaking if @MaryBowdenMD’s case gets a good judge. You admitted you don’t know these names. How many Jews are named in your paper? And why pretend to be Jonathan’s close friend—it's weird.

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

Hey @MstrKapln where’s your alleged amicus that could be groundbreaking if @MaryBowdenMD’s case gets a good judge? Remember when you admitted you don’t know any of these names? How many jews are named in your paper? You try sliding up to people claiming to be Jonathan’s close friend, it’s weird.

Saved - February 1, 2026 at 5:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I trace how ex-SEAL Dave Lopez, after Blackwater and a string of ventures, ran Haiti operations for Operation Underground Railroad and became the power behind Ile-à-Vache’s control, tied to Tim Ballard’s network. Ballard’s rise—and later discredit—linked to GOP allies and a Nazarene Fund role. I note Lopez’s role in Gardy Mardy’s story, the 2010 earthquake, and Haiti’s 2011 politics, ending with a U.S.-backed presidency.

@down_zulu - ☢️🍞brebmanfren🍞☢️

How Ex-SEAL on Child Rescue Mission Became Island Kingpin The Daily Beast has discovered he instead fell into the Caribbean state’s thorny politics, and into an unbelievable business deal: control of a paradisiacal island that Port-au-Prince seized from its inhabitants. Since Dave Lopez left the elite special ops force, his résumé has featured a stint with Erik Prince’s mercenary firm Blackwater, the launch of an anti-vaxx supplement company, and multiple ventures with former Trump Customs and Immigration Services chief Ken Cuccinelli. But the gig that sent him to Haiti, that entangled him with Port-au-Prince’s powerbrokers, and positioned him to win the rights to build what his team vows will be the struggling country’s answer to Disney World, was his role at Operation Underground Railroad (O.U.R.). O.U.R. and its founder, Tim Ballard, became nationally famous last summer with the release of its fictionalized cinematic origin story Sound of Freedom—and then infamous in the fall, as Ballard faced claims of sexual predation and of self-enrichment at the expense of his organization’s donors. Ballard has cast these allegations as a “smear campaign” designed to besmirch his name and extort cash. But in years past, Ballard and O.U.R. had enjoyed a level of celebrity on the political right, where their mission of disrupting alleged child-trafficking networks resonated with a fringe inflamed with conspiracy theories about elite pedophiles dominating the world. Experts on exploitation warned that the group’s flashy tactics, which included filmed sweeps of supposed underage sex dens, served the self-styled saviors more than the victims. But Ballard developed tight ties with Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes and withthen-Sen. Orrin Hatch, secured an appointment from then-President Donald Trump to a new council on human trafficking in 2019, and—according to conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt—enjoyed the personal imprimatur of Trump National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien. The head of O.U.R.’s operations in Haiti was Lopez. The ex-SEAL also served as Ballard’s lieutenant in another of his signature projects, the Glenn Beck-founded Nazarene Fund, formed to rescue Christians from persecution in the Middle East. And later, it was Lopez who gave up information to investigators in a probe that led to Ballard’s public disgrace. But by that time, the contacts Lopez had made through O.U.R. had already secured him power over the island of Ile-à-Vache. He did not respond to repeated outreach from The Daily Beast for this story. “Gardy is the kid whose story created Operation Underground Railroad,” Ballard asserted in the 2018 documentary Operation Toussaint The remark referred to Gardy Mardy, a Haitian-American boy from Ballard’s home state of Utah, abducted in Port-au-Prince in late 2009, whose father, like Ballard, is active in the Church of Latter Day Saints. The film describes a 2014 raid on a location where Ballard believed traffickers were holding Gardy, and depicts subsequent trainings and operations ostensibly aimed at rescuing him and other child sex slaves in Haiti. Besides Ballard, Operation Toussaint heavily features Lopez, Beck, Attorney General Reyes, and Sen. Hatch—as well as several of O.U.R.’s political allies from Haiti. What it does not feature is the event that made Gardy Mardy so hard to find—the earthquake that devastated the country just weeks after his disappearance. The political aftershocks of that disaster reverberated throughout the country—even to Ile-à-Vache, six miles detached from the southwest city of Les Cayes. Barely a year later, a contested presidential election ushered U.S.-backed candidate Michel Martelly, a pop star and son of a Shell Oil executive, into the presidential palace. https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-ex-seal-on-child-rescue-mission-became-island-kingpin

Saved - January 30, 2026 at 2:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m saying nearly every person I mention is a Knight of Malta, with El Salvador as their HQ and Bukele among them. I trace Flynn’s network to OSS/Gladio/Paperclip roots, via Singlaub, Hoover, WACL, and CIA color revolutions. Singlaub mentored Flynn; WACL funded Contras. The CNP, TPUSA, X Spaces all feed a single fascist network shaping global conflict, including Latin America and beyond. Israel-centric claims are false; the continent is Freemasonic & Catholic.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

As is nearly every person I mentioned is a Knight of Malta. El Salvador is the Regional HQ of the Knights of Malta. Bukele is one too. All of the same characters & networks that were involved with Iran Contra are also involved with present day CNP and BUKELE. Much of what we see with Flynn’s Network draws a straight line back to the OSS / Operation Gladio / Paperclip/ SS intelligence networks with Swiss Allen Dulles + J Edgar Hoover / the WACL chapter in the US (John Singlaub) = CIA Color Revolutions around the world KNIGHT OF MALTA JOHN SINGLAUB IS MICHAEL FLYNNS MENTOR. Singlaub was President of the World Anti Communist League (WACL) US branch and financed the Nicaraguan guerrillas in Iran-Contra. The WACL was created the same year as the Council for National Policy; in 1981. SAME PLAYERS TODAY. Same fascist networks in charge of political assassinations and training counter-guerrillas in all conflict zones, including Afghanistan where even Osama Bin Laden was a part of it. (hi Tim Ballard, Dana Rohrbacher and Erik Prince!) Peter Grace's branch of the Knights of Malta was the primary distributor of aid to the Contras in Central America, raised >+$50M by the New Canaan, Connecticut-based Americares Foundation, Robert Macaulay (Knight of Malta). Tim Ballard John Singlaub Michael Flynn Erik Prince Paul Vallely Tucker Carlson Dana Rohrbacher Paul Behrens = CNP + TPUSA + X Spaces Grift The amount of propaganda that has been circulating surrounding world affairs has everyone completely psyoped into believing the most ridiculous claims. “Israel controls Central + Latin America?!” Ya ok that’s straight RETARDED. The entire continent is Freemasonic & Catholic.

Saved - January 30, 2026 at 1:55 AM

@Warrllion - WarrLion

Who sold the patent to Elbit? 🔻 Bet Trillion won't touch that one. They love their mythology. ARCAS? A Hunter? FEED ME?? Hunter Strategy?? https://t.co/cOaopsNY1q

@Warrllion - WarrLion

Who sold the Augmented Reality Patent that lined up the shot on.. @CharlieKirk11 UKR/RUS/ISIS/UTAH/NAG OPS Elbit Systems of America>Roanoke VA Roanoke🔻David Lopez TRILLION>Zelant>AR>Elbit>CK ZELANT>Slutsky>Oracle>Booz/EPA Lyashok>New Layer Capital>Pact Financial>Miles Romney https://t.co/Wdx3nivcEh

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

@TimmyGs_312 @EscanorReloaded @IanMalcolm84 That Space “exposing NAG” made a big effort to focus on the NAG - The Wellness Company ties towards “IsRaEL” when the bigger scrutiny should be given towards the DIRECT connections of NAG co-founders to Erika Kirk (Corcoran Group) and Utah (University of Utah). David Lopez https://t.co/NYWff86ToV

Saved - January 29, 2026 at 7:56 PM

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

I must have missed that because I dont hear a single person talking about the Prince - Ballard - Lopez connection to The Wellness Company because its the OBVIOUS SMOKING GUN and LOGICAL ANSWER to who is behind NAG (Network Axis Group): The Council for National Policy and the Knights of Pythia. all the JQ clowns and affiliates : ☩ Maze the airhead ghetto street trick who should have been chased off this app ages ago ☩ Dezzie who is DEFINITELY a FED ☩ DDGSarah - just lol - can’t tell if she’s schizo or just a chaos agent, she’s entirely inconsistent ☩ Trillion the crypto scamming data mining sociopath with a TON of skeletons in his past (look into him if you want to be entertained, he’s the one data mining X Spaces for NAG, I already sent you the proof of that Escanor) ☩ Jonathan Cagle who works with the Flynn Extortion Network enforcer Jeremy Oliver, Paul Valelly and David Byrne (CNP - Racine - Knights of Pythia - TPUSA) — also recently paid by Ryan Matta to gangstalk me and others on X. ☩ Ryan Matta - lol where do I even begin?! He’s paid by the very people doing the trafficking ! ☩ Ian Malcom whos definitely NOT AMERICAN, Like TruthTeller, Joann, Mademoiselle, Lovell, etc etc what’s with all these Commonwealth / Canadians/ Aussies pushing BTC, eh? ☩ Ian Carroll the Swiss Canadian… who claims he doesn’t know Brock Pierce… ya ok. ☩ Sam Parker the Swiss Mormon FED. Do not overlook the Swiss part. ☩ Matty Whack the agitprop FED, who has a podcast with a Swiss… lol ☩ Keith who turned out to be a giant disappointment and sellout, now has Cookie as a handler. What a JOKE. It’s not some big Scooby Doo mystery why these paid idiots all keep glazing over the David Lopez - Prince - Tim Ballard connection and acting like it’s not there. Because they’re all being paid by the same fucking source. Sam Parker and Ryan Matta not only know them but have also worked with Ballard Prince and Lopez. This entire charade is ridiculous. Not sure what you're doing just sitting there on the sidelines while these assholes just make a mockery out of America thru their degenerate BTC Bukele circle jerk. FINISH THEM! You have the arsenal, now do it! I recommend also paying attention to who is having givesendgo fundraisers for Jonathan Cagle. It’s proof they ALL are being paid by the same source: the CNP.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript follows a chaotic, multi-voiced discussion centered on political information networks, election integrity, and coordinated activism around protests and media narratives. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 repeatedly question the sources of information: “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and the same for Jonathan, signaling concern about where information originates and how it is disseminated. - Speaker 2 describes a sense of purpose from sharing information and notes that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, under oath in, you know, a senate… the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” - Speaker 3 references multiple online presences, including YouTube and Facebook (Jeremy Oliver, Onslaught Media Group), and mentions protesting activities as part of the narrative. - Speaker 4 mentions “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs,” implying rehearsal for protests or political actions. - Speaker 1 indicates a readiness to “storm the capital” and notes that participants are “all actors,” signaling a performative or coordinated element to actions. - Speaker 3, as a journalist or news producer, plans to stream live from protests to show “the real story” and “support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - A dialogue involving Speaker 1 and Patrick discusses Mary Fanning and Mary Fenix, with questions about speaking to Patrick and perceived fairness in conversations, leading to a strained exchange. - Speaker 5 asserts that “Donald Trump has no business being president,” and introduces a coalition or think tank that includes Biden, Harris, Mike Flynn, and Simon Johnson (an IMF chief economist by birth in England), framing a network with both Democrats and Republicans. - Speaker 3 introduces Brian Gamble as CIO of the America Project, founded by Patrick Byrne, who sits on the Council on Foreign Relations with Stanley McChrystal. The claim is made that Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from McChrystal’s home; McChrystal is described as an advisor for the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects Trump-trending content and promotes opposing viewpoints. The system is said to share opposing viewpoints, connecting to efforts involving the Flynn network to target the Patriot movement. - Speaker 6 expresses disbelief at the unfolding information, while Speaker 1 dismisses an interruption during a conversation, showing friction in interviews and onlookers. - Speaker 8 details that “the entire Flynn network was there,” naming Ali Alexander (a former CMP member) as a lead organizer, and Michael Flynn’s appearance on the CMP staff roster. The aim is stated as “creating instability as they’re trying to carry out a color revolution.” The speaker lists a list of Flynn network traits: a united and organized opposition, the ability to drive home the claim that voting results are falsified, compliant independent media to inform citizens about the falsified vote, and the mobilization of tens of thousands of demonstrators. - Speakers 9 and 10 discuss 2020 in Maricopa County, noting 395,000 in-person voters on election day (a figure they describe as low due to COVID) and debating how many Republicans intended but did not vote in Maricopa in the midterms. Projections estimate large missed numbers (700,000 or around 150,000 in later drafts), with debate on whether turnout would favor one party given demographics and turnout expectations. - Speaker 8 critiques associated figures: Patrick Byrne, Roger Richards (tattoo of Lucifer, propaganda space films with Jordan Sather), Emily Newman (ties to US Agency for Global Media, linked to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry), and Brian Gamble’s background in information warfare. - There are digressions about fundraising sources, rockefeller connections, and a tension between reform goals and control, with Speaker 12 suggesting figures like Charlie Kirk publicly advocate doing “the same things that got us into this place” to “beat the system,” implying a critique of reform vs. control within the movement. - The dialogue closes with personal anecdotes about Wisconsin politics, a case discussed with a Supreme Court justice race, and a strained, emotional confrontation that underscores distrust and the perception of manipulated information flows.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke? Speaker 1: Who the fuck is Jonathan? Where does he get his information? Why did he delete karaoke? Speaker 2: It's been a blessing. We've been able to share incredible amounts of information, and it really kinda changed the game for me as far as, like, a sense of purpose in this because most people don't know this. But, you know, Wisconsin was the first state that the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, you know, under oath in, you know, a senate. I think it was the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity. It's the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity. Speaker 3: So now I've I've got another YouTube page up. I've got another personal Facebook page up. You can find me on Facebook at Jeremy Oliver on YouTube. I'm Onslaught Media Group. And and, you know, there you can go and see at the last protesting. Speaker 4: Using other state capitals for practice dry runs. Speaker 1: We're basically ready to storm the capital with us in a couple of minutes. We're all actors, but I wanna direct and act. Speaker 3: Get the real story if you watch mainstream media. So as a journalist, as a news producer, I'm going just to stream live and and show exactly what's going on at the protest and and really just support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights people. Speaker 1: Patrick, why won't you speak to me about Mary Fenix? Do you wanna go? Do wanna leave now? Why why can't I speak to him about Mary Fanning? He don't want to. Okay. But now How do feel you're cheating? I was in the middle of a conversation with him. Who are you? Conversation's over. Who are you? Speaker 5: And Donald Trump has no business being president. He's a and Donald Trump has no business being president. He's a Speaker 1: and Donald Trump has no business being president. He's a Speaker 5: With it in this coalition super think tank of Biden, Harris, a couple intellectual figure behind them, I'm not even gonna name, put Mike Flynn in there and two economists. One economist is a democrat, and his name is Simon Johnson. And he's we're friendly. Haven't talked to him in a couple years. He was the chief economist of the IMF. English man by birth, Speaker 3: I think There, I first of all, I I encourage you to get out to the capital today or to on Friday. Speaker 4: Brian Gamble is the CIO of the America Project, which was founded by Patrick Byrne, who sits on the Council of Foreign Relations with Stanley McChrystal, Flynn's mentor. And apparently, they're so close that Flynn registered the company, Flynn Intel Group, from the home of Stanley McChrystal. And Stanley McChrystal is an advisor for the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects communications from President Trump trending on social media and then finds the most effective opposing viewpoints. And then the system shares the opposing viewpoints. Same thing they're doing with the Flynn network to target the Patriot movement. Speaker 6: This is unbelievable. Unbelievable. I I feel like I'm living a dream right now. Speaker 1: Out of my way. I'm leaving. I mean, my kid is opening. Don't touch me and get out of my way. I'm leaving. So I'll give him a quick answer. Come on. You're right. The reason I walk away because your question's ridiculous. Conversation. Producer of all these I have no idea. You're tasked with dentist conversation you had with Mike Lindell. Don't trust about some conversation with Mike Lindell. No problem. Like, loves to ask it. It's a question. I have no idea. No. No. It's funny Don't trust this guy. Don't trust me. Ah, okay. So the man get the out of my way. I'm going to the parking garage. What a ridiculous response. Get away from me, man. Is this the direction to the parking lot? Both of you get away from me. Speaker 3: And if you can't make that, then get out in your neighborhood. Protest with some other people. Speaker 0: You have Speaker 1: not not nothing to worry about. Speaker 7: There's always faking moves. Never making moves. Acid shake bottles pop. The government is breaking down, you fools. Speaker 8: The entire Flynn network was there. Ali Alexander, a former CMP member, was a lead organizer. And Michael Flynn, who appeared on the CMP staff roster, gave an address as we know. But the idea of everything leading up to this day was all about creating instability as they're trying to carry out a color revolution. Some of some of the things on this list that completely define who the Flynn network is, a united and organized opposition, an ability quickly to drive home the point that voting results are falsified, compliant independent media to inform citizens about the falsified vote, incapable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators to protest the electoral fraud. Does this sound familiar? Speaker 9: Think about 2020 and what showed up on game day in Maricopa, not including drop offs, just in day day versus what happened in the midterms. Speaker 10: Well, 2020, they reported 395,000 in person voters on election day, which they themselves admitted was a a lowball figure due to the COVID pandemic. Okay. Speaker 9: Was that statewide or in Maricopa County? Speaker 10: That's Maricopa alone. Speaker 9: Right. And so therefore, we're supposed to believe that there was a hundred, two hundred fifty thousand in a midterm. I mean, so what is your guess? What is your projection of how many Republicans had the intent to cast a ballot but did not cast a ballot in Maricopa County? Speaker 10: That's a little bit of a speculation, but I would believe it would be every bit if it would be every bit of 700,000 probably, and it would be every bit of 700,000 probably in 700,000, probably in Maricopa given the population demographics, the growth, the expectation of surge and turnout on election day, as well as how polarizing this midterm election was gonna be. Speaker 6: Tyler? Yeah. I mean Speaker 9: 700 sounds that sounds high. Speaker 6: Of what was missed or what was Speaker 9: What was missed? The total? I I think a 150,000 was probably missed. Speaker 6: Yeah. I mean, look. I mean, here's the reality is it's it's well within the within the belief. If you've if you've seen what's happened, you look at the numbers here and what the projections and estimations were. I mean, the drop offs were really high, and they ended up bending more towards Democrats than we thought they would. Speaker 8: The America Project, another group associated with Flynn. We've got Patrick Byrne who did deep rig with Michael Flynn and Roger Richards who literally has a tattoo that represents Lucifer on his neck and has created propaganda space films with Jordan Sather to take you away from Christ. We've got Emily Newman who also had ties to the US Agency for Global Media, where Hillary Clinton and John Kerry were board members and directors. That reads as an independent agency of the United States government that broadcast news and information vital to US national interest. Basically sounds like propaganda. And then we have Brian Gamble, the CIO of America Projects, who boast about being trained in information warfare and psychological operations. Speaker 0: Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke? Speaker 1: Is that part of the sign up? What are you at liberty to say? Or is it a bunch of Well, let let me just tell you the truth. You know, I'm tied to information, and it comes out of a group, called the, Army of Northern Virginia. K? Yep. Now this is a group of military intelligence specialists of over 800 people. Speaker 11: Then I give a fuck about any fucking person in the Trump administration being upset with giving them, oh, how dare you? Like, you you guys have no fucking idea to list the bodies that we have. Like, if we were serial killers, it would be like, I don't know, Mal or something. What everybody needs to do is get in like, emotionally detached from your e personas, number one. And if that means you have to create a bunch of alt accounts to hide your main account, but everybody needs to be creating burner accounts for the purposes of unmasking all of these traders and making them feel IRL consequences and the threat of IRL consequences because the things that they do behind the privilege of anonymity, we force the issue. And they realize Twitter is no longer a safe place for them. I'm not gonna go sit at the fucking Pentagon in Arlington and just go click buttons and subvert a bunch of people in a fucking cubicle with a big screen in front of me and a dude wearing, you know, some marine uniform with a bunch of metals that he didn't fucking earn. That person needs to be interrupting and saying, yeah, boss. I I can't do this anymore. My kids and my address just fucking wound up on this platform. How the fuck did they find out who I am? That's what the government needs to think about the every time they log in, they need to have second fucking thoughts. They need to be terrified. Security clearances don't mean a goddamn thing to me. I don't give a fuck. Speaker 1: Guy's intimidating me. He's pushing me. Alright. Where's your vehicle? It's in the garage. Hey. What is your name? Are you working for the hotel? I'm working. Tell me. Speaker 0: This is your name. You are Obviously, the connections to the Rockefellers are super sus. Super sus. Speaker 1: So what would you to be more Speaker 0: like Scott Pressler? Well, it sounds like I should just totally sell out because then I would just be, like, totally taken care of by the very people that we're trying to fight against. I mean, the Rockefellers the Rockefellers do not just, like, take up causes that are noble and justifiable. Okay? Mean, like, the Rockefellers are some of the most nefarious people that you can find in American history. And for them to have, like, directly given money like, it's not like they gave indirectly through, another organization. Like, they gave to Scott directly. So, like, how did he get into a room with the Rockefeller family? Speaker 12: Always trying to get to the bottom of is that strip away whatever money's coming in, strip away all that kind of stuff of who we theorize fellers and the rest of it. Charlie Kirk is telling you, in his own words, that he believes the way we are going to beat the system is to literally do all of the same things that got us into this place, that built the system more, but more. It's not even like, oh, we're gonna do them and now we're gonna perform the system. They don't they're telling you in their own words, and Chris always talks about this, they have no desire to reform the system. They just want to control the system and control you through it, and they're now just telling you that. Speaker 0: It's the vote harder harder. And they are the organization. Speaker 1: Yeah. I Speaker 12: mean, it's just amazing that they're saying. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I was so I was just checking up to see what happened in Wisconsin, and it's fascinating to me that democrats would elect this supreme court justice. Speaker 6: I mean, Oak Lake, it looks Speaker 0: like she's gonna win handily, but then itself would also pass voter ID by a wide margin, which is, like, not Democrat issue at all. Like Yeah. We we just talked about that a little bit. Okay. So I'll have to go back in time and just watch it and scream at the television. But You're absolutely right, though. Yeah. Yeah. It doesn't make any sense. Yeah. Yes. Speaker 13: And I know you had been involved in Speaker 14: Was mother rushed out to the case? And I, you know, I don't know anything about it. It's not my world. She just reached out cold? She reached out cold? Wow. And, and I spoke to her at great length, and it and it scared the crap out of me. Kid was clearly killed by somebody. That was my conclusion, objectively, with no skin in the game. Speaker 13: And you after reading the latest report? Yes. Like, look. And I Speaker 14: immediately called a member of congress from California, Roe Con, and said, this is crazy. You gotta look into this. And nothing ever happened. Speaker 1: Of course not. Cal Rokok. Come on. Again, Speaker 13: I think this is I I feel strange and sad debating this and having You are a little bit accusing me, but, You Speaker 1: are a Speaker 12: little this isn't a debate. You're you're accusing me. You're accusing me. See, what he's trying to do is he's trying to build sympathy.

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

How anger and personal vendettas turn to pettiness: Here’s @Meowllian basically saying she has nothing, her hand is weak, so she’s trying to attack through “vanity.” And here’s @TimmyGs_312 I have a question genius: You remember when the government put the whole country on house arrest locked people in their homes like animals over COVID? And now you’re telling me the guy offering a place to be human again to meet, talk, breathe, socialize is the “bad guy”? That’s like slandering someone because they got ticketed for refusing a mask. And you use a fake account’s post as receipts?… At some point anger turns into obedience: you start cheering the same machine that caged you, just because it’s aiming at someone you don’t like. That’s not principle but spite with a government co-sign. And both you and meow “should know better” You guys both posted this garbage in the last hour or so… Then you ask why I don’t take up arms and fight with you? You guys are both toxic and any team with you both is a losing one, anybody associated with you is at a huge disadvantage. Do better and F off

Saved - January 29, 2026 at 7:39 PM

@Warrllion - WarrLion

Who sold the Augmented Reality Patent that lined up the shot on.. @CharlieKirk11 UKR/RUS/ISIS/UTAH/NAG OPS Elbit Systems of America>Roanoke VA Roanoke🔻David Lopez TRILLION>Zelant>AR>Elbit>CK ZELANT>Slutsky>Oracle>Booz/EPA Lyashok>New Layer Capital>Pact Financial>Miles Romney https://t.co/Wdx3nivcEh

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

That Space “exposing NAG” made a big effort to focus on the NAG - The Wellness Company ties towards “IsRaEL” when the bigger scrutiny should be given towards the DIRECT connections of NAG co-founders to Erika Kirk (Corcoran Group) and Utah (University of Utah). David Lopez co-founder of TWC was also glazed over… ya know… the guy who was on the board of Tim Ballard’s disastrous OUR? And who worked with Erik Prince & headed Operation Toussaint in HAITI? Erika Kirk and Angel Studios? Romanian Angels? Sound of Freedom? Carlos Slim? NXIVM? Anyone gonna mention the NAG - TPUSA - Council for National Policy (founder Foster Freiss who helped CK launch TPUSA) ties? —> TPUSA wasn’t “captured” when the entire organization is made up of ZIONISTS. It seems to me this was all about NAG hiring ‘anti - Zionists’ to make sure the audience is looking at Israelis, not all the Christian Zionist factions that make up the majority of TPUSA.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The time game is over. Justice with General Flynn. They criticize the Department of Just Us and recall a past moment when they would have been brought into the DOJ in handcuffs. Speaker 1: Delivers a stream of violent, braggadocious lyrics about weapons, killings, and dominance, including references to shooting, trafficking, and threatening rivals. The content emphasizes keeping enemies in check, physical violence, and material wealth, with repeated lines about not losing sleep over killers, firing weapons, and "run it up" for money and power. Speaker 2: Argues that many people gaining sudden large followings on Twitter or talking about topics like low taxes or transgender pronouns may be pedophiles, suggesting conservative media uses people with criminal pasts as influencers. States that such individuals say things to align with a broader agenda and mentions Israel in the context of a broader critique of conservative priorities. Concludes with a tip to contact Charlie Cook for those seeking a "second act" in public life. Speaker 3: Kyle Clifton discusses an after-party associated with TPUSA’s America Fest in Phoenix on December 19, called the Grand Young Party. The party reportedly featured girls dancing half-naked on stage, girls locked in cages, underage drinking, stripper poles, sex on the dance floor, and mentions “strange ritual Zionist extremism.” He notes promo footage from Florida and Phoenix, blurred faces of attendees, and that age did not matter if the attendee knew the organizer, Joe Bazrawi. Background is provided on Maverick events as the organizers. He reports a security guard tackled an 18-year-old patron, causing injuries; police encouraged filing a report for assault. Parents of other female patrons are considering lawsuits for supplying minors with alcohol. The event was advertised as a TPUSA America Fest after party, hosted by TPUSA ambassador/employee Joe Bazrawi, whose travel and lodging were paid for by TPUSA. He claims TPUSA was aware of and encouraged the party, and that Bazrawi maintains a private dossier on conservatives who oppose his party or beliefs to blacklist them from TPUSA events. Bazrawi allegedly attends other events to photograph attendees for his dossier and share with TPUSA executives. Attendees allegedly included Matt Gaetz, with rumors that James O’Keefe and Madison Cawthorn were present; photos are mentioned. Questions are raised about TPUSA’s responsibility for hosting unsanctioned events with high-profile guests and potential legal consequences or PR damage. The after-party reportedly had about 30–40 attendees leave early; refunds were issued to some in response to public comments, while others did not receive refunds. Some attendees were admitted as late as 1:45 AM; the event ended at 2 AM. Ticketing was disorganized, with staff not knowing who attended. Local Antifa chapters reportedly planned to submit stories to CNN to harm Matt Gaetz’s career. The speaker expresses concern about the conservatism movement’s image and the potential implications for Gaetz and Cawthorn. Speaker 4: The Vault claims to possess extensive material—video, pictures, emails, audio, text messages, phone calls—on everyone and to be willing to drop it all. The speaker has “a lot of crap on Richard Spencer and everybody else” and suggests signing up for Telegram to access this material. Speaker 5–6: Expressions of fear or alarm from the audience, with a call to “Dale” and a plea for help or relief, indicating tension or distress in the room.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The time game is over. Justice with General Flynn. Can you believe it? Talk about the department of just us. Yeah. You you you know, a couple years ago, it'd be like us in handcuffs if we had to go into the DOJ. They tried they tried to bring me into this place in handcuffs. Speaker 1: Plus, to hit me with the fatty. I know the dog ain't smelling because I wrapped it. One big turn to two, that's how I do magic. Better know his belt ass when we catch This a dirty jean with a Chris Vector. They're like 40 shots for you and who else which. I'm too up, I drop them bags through the hood like it's Christmas. I know choke on blow as pole. How you know I drop shit with them? Bitch on 40 flows up. Ain't no back though we get busy. Niggas dead in a home. How is blood on the ceiling? I don't lose no sleep about these motherfucking killers. Heard he lost his twin about this shit trying to go against us. Yeah. That ass fabbit I put so we don't let her trick it. Joe try to get on life. He took two lives just one pistol. Nigga beat the road. I stopped a 100 balls in a rental. Babe, mama ain't tripping about no old emotions. Trying to fuck them with me. Run that attack up. Run it up. You nigga can't fuck with You want some money, bitch. Fuck with us. Ask the man for the switch. One tap is empty, and I gotta reload this bitch. Mama's mad because they son down young, and they casket ain't opening. Watch them fly and sew and fly and hide. Like balloons floating. Count the lights of bitch to laughing gates. That's where he going. Peace, man. I'm pocket stuffed crust with cheese on them. Bounce out blowing a fuzzy pussy. Show me my opponent. I can get this shit shipped. A parachute didn't land on you. Off in the kitchen cooking up coconut mixing dope and dormant. I ran that sack up. I ran it up. You nicks can't fuck with us. You want some money, bitch fuck with us. Speaker 2: People wondered why people you've never heard of have suddenly got 1,000,000 followers on Twitter talking about low taxes or transgender pronouns? Well, chances are they're a child molester. You see, conservative media organizations use people with insalubrious pasts because they'll say anything, do anything, go anywhere. And sometimes, the things that they are paid to say don't necessarily concord exactly with the priorities of the base. Israel. So if you're a pedophile and you want a second act in public life, if you feel like you need some extra wind beneath your wings, if you think that there's life beyond your conviction or beyond getting away with it as a conservative influencer, here's Charlie Cook's phone number. Speaker 3: Hello, everyone. My name is Kyle Clifton. I'm here today to talk a little bit about an after party that took place during TPUSA's America Fest in Phoenix, Arizona on December 19 called the Grand Young Party. This party consisted of girls dancing half naked on stage. It advertised girls locked in cages, underage drinking, stripper poles, sex on the dance floor, some very strange ritual Zionist extremism, which we'll talk about, pending assault case, and a possible pending lawsuit. This footage is a mix of their promo footage in Florida, footage filmed in Phoenix over the weekend. I blurred a lot of the faces, some of the individuals that are intoxicated or in age restricted sections that don't belong. Upon investigating, the age limit did not actually matter as long as you knew the event organizer, Joe or Lance. Just to give you guys some background if you don't know what America Fest is, it's a huge libertarian event. It's they host a lot of libertarian speakers. It's a good place to network with others, though. I'm not a libertarian. I'm a traditional social conservative, and I am actually sitting outside waiting for church service to start as we speak. I was not at this after party. I gathered information from many sources, And the very strange part about this party still has me scratching my head to this day. They were giving out party favors with extremist groups on them. Now hear me out on this, because I know this can be a pretty touchy subject. We know the topic of Israel and the Republican party is split. They don't understand the real concept of America first. Whichever side you're on, this is a little bit different. This isn't just about Israel. This is about a subject called Zionism. Usually, the Republicans and the Democrats come to a mutual understanding that Zionism is a very evil extremist ideology. A lot of the times, this extremism roots for the death of our country and conceals itself to really hide its intentions. But enough about that. I'm not gonna get too far into that. Basically, they passed out party favors at this event that have little badges that say Zionism is a badge of honor. They also passed out Zionist pens and flags. I did more research into this event and to the event organizers. They are called Maverick events. And on their previous event, they hosted this another Zionist extremist party at the same exact time and location as another TPUSA after party. It's almost starting to feel a little manufactured in that they're forcing these conservative groups and Zionist groups together to kind of force some kind of agenda. So I started to feel like I stumbled into a bigger conspiracy the more I looked into this, but enough of that. Back to the main subject. I'm gonna talk more about the criminal charges that happened at this party. During the event, one of the security guards tackled an 18 year old patron because he believed he had alcohol in his cup. When he tackled him, he left physical injuries to the kid as seen by this photo. After the incident, the police concluded the 18 year old did, in fact, have water in his cup and encouraged him to file a police report on the security guard for assault. I'm told by this patron that we might see a potential lawsuit in the Maverick events for gross misconduct and improper protocol. And there are a few other female patrons whose parents are also considering pressing charges for supplying minors with alcohol. I'll update everyone on that as as I hear back. Now the big question everyone is asking is, how is this event connected to TPUSA? Well, first, it was advertised as a TPUSA America Fest after party on their brochures, on their web site, on their advertisements, on their social media. Secondly, the event was hosted by a TPUSA ambassador slash employee named Joe Bazrawi. Joe's plane ticket and hotel was completely paid for by TPUSA during America Fest. They supplied, his ability to get to Arizona for this event. I've talked with many others, many other TPUSA employees during this investigation who all state that TPUSA was very aware of this after party and encouraged it. I also received word from four different TPUSA employees that Joe keeps a folder with him that he carries around. It's a private dossier of any conservative who opposes Joe's party and other beliefs. He keeps this list so he can blacklist individuals from other TPUSA events since it since he helps with hosting, events for TPUSA. Now just a little more backstory on this guy. He's attempted to get into other smaller events that are hosted by competitors of TPUSA to take photos of the attendees, to add to his dossier of people, so he can forward this information to the TPUSA executives. Now we've seen other we've seen liberal school board members here in Arizona actually creating similar lists of competitors being fired from their positions on the school board. So I think this behavior, it's it's unacceptable. From Joe and TPUSA, I forwarded all this information to the TPUSA board members and executives. Well, they offered tables to exclusive guests. So which exclusive guests attended this TPUSA after party that involved underage drinking, assault charges, ritual Zionism, strippers, sex on the dance floor? Well, none other than Matt Gaetz and rumored that James O'Keefe and Madison Cawthorn were there as well. Now here are some photos of them at the TPUSA after party. I don't believe personally that they spent $10,000, but I I was told they spent a a pretty penny. Now does TPUSA do they allow their ambassadors to host these giant parties with no rules and invite TPUSA honored guests like Gates and O'Keeffe to risk putting them in danger of a potential lawsuit or a potential hit piece. Now I was looking online. We now have local Antifa, Arizona chapters that I pay close attention to. They're posting about this event and how they can try to submit this story to CNN to hurt Matt Gaetz's career. I'm a big fan of James O'Keefe and the work he puts in, and so does TPSA do they wanna be responsible for endangering the public relations for these individuals for attending one of their unsanctioned degenerate after parties? I really don't think Matt Gaetz wants his name plastered next to articles of underage drinking and Zionism. Now I'm not a fan personally of Gaetz or Cawthorn, but this this hurts the conservative movement entirely. Now, back to the, the the groups that were at the party. I was told a group of thirty and forty individuals left at the same time, all went home, requested refunds. Only a couple of them were actually refunded. Now I looked into this, they've only been refunded because they commented on my previous video. Lance and Joe have been doing damage control to save face regarding this party and reached out to her and refunded her and her friend. Now some individuals were let in as late as 01:45AM, and the party ended at 2AM. Their group paid over $200 to get in, only were able to enjoy fifteen minutes. The event ticketing was so unorganized that they did not know who was even there. They were offering refunds if you tell them, basically, you pinky promise you didn't go inside. The event organizers, Joe and Lance, did not know who attended their own event and who did not. Speaker 4: This is called the vault. This is the vault. This has shit on everyone you have ever heard of. Video, pictures, emails, audio, text messages, phone calls, anything you'd ever really want to know about every public figure I have ever encountered. Most of the conversations I've had with people when I've been a single party consent state, recorded, archived. I have shit on everyone. And I'm now in a position in my career where I'm perfectly happy to start dropping it all. So I have a lot of crap on Richard Spencer and and and and everybody else. And what maybe there is a reason to sign up for Telegram after all. Speaker 5: Love of God. Speaker 6: For the love of God. Please. Speaker 1: Dale. Speaker 6: Dale.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

@7SEES_ @ShaykhSulaiman @TimmyG_Chi_312 @AndrewTHTravel @MohFitX @DanaDooDah That is exactly what these NAG people on this Space were trying to convince the audience of. Lots of tugging on people’s heart strings and trust me bro vapid statements. Then one of them starts screaming over Timmy when he points out the NAG CEO Lojas Horvath is a Professor at https://t.co/eZieEMowP8

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 11:15 PM

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Who is really behind NAG and the X Spaces Host Racket? The Council for National Policy - which includes General Flynn, Steve Bannon, Erik Prince & Charlie Kirk. Ever wondered why they never mention the CNP? https://t.co/vkMyBMao4j

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

NAG - Ryan Matta - Maze - Tim Ballard Lmao 🤣 THIS EXPLAINS ALOT. Maze’s loser sidekick, Coyote has rocks for brains and thought it was a good idea to accept Ryan Matta’s directive to try and smear me. This occured right after I exposed that Bukele’s BTC paradise in El Salvador is a giant fraud and racket, back in September. Ryan didn’t even address the huge issues with the narrative he’s been pushing, he straight blocked me. Then stated that “he’d take a bullet for his President Bukele.” 😑 One person did show up to Ryan’s defense almost immediately… and that was none other than @MazeLove14. I thought this was very odd. The next day, she shows up to Keith’s Space and starts screaming at me like a banshee and accusing me of all sorts of lies. Turns out I wiped the floor with Coyote when I proved that Maze and Coyote were lying about being out of their NAG contract. It also proves that NAG is also working with Ryan Matta, Tim Ballard (Knight of Malta & Mormon) and Sam Parker (Fed Mormon).

@mexfinanciero - Mercenario Financier⭕️

@Meowllian @TimmyGs_312 @YoteOfStreet is a recently converted JEW who should not be taken serious at all

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 10:01 PM

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

That goes for RYAN MATTA too. I spared him the embarrassment of exposing that he was the one who paid Jonathan to gangstalk me after Dustin Nemos and Coyote failed miserably. Ryan went to visit Jonathan back in Sept / October in Alabama but has since lied about that happening. In the meantime, I’ll remind everyone that THEY ALL WORK FOR General FLYNN. Here’s the clip proving that Jonathan and Ryan work together. FAFO MAZE. FAFO @MazeLove14 you’re fucking next. Second video shows that Jonathan worked for Patrick Byrne and Jeremy Oliver. Both very close to Flynn, Brian Gamble, Ivan Raiklin, etc.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on Jonathan’s exceptional ability to recite and recall information. Speaker 1 praises Jonathan, comparing him to Ian and Sam Parker, saying very few people have Jonathan’s gift and that he might be on the level of a truth teller. They recount a five-hour session with Jonathan, noting that at one point the speaker felt like they hadn’t spoken for an hour, only to be told by Jonathan that he was on fire, with the speaker needing water or a break while Jonathan continued to perform. The speakers acknowledge that Jonathan has been “absolutely killing it.” Speaker 2 comments on sending all the I photos to editorial teams and expresses sympathy for editors due to the volume of clips Jonathan generated. They also remark on how the editors dislike Jonathan’s username because it changes three times due to deplatforming, making it hard to search for him. There is a light anecdotal exchange about Jonathan using different vendors and the humorous mention of a “big boobs” vendor, followed by a brief joke about a “big tape, girl.” A reference is then made to a “Rebecca” or “Rebecca, right beyond,” and a clarification that the speaker is not the one being messaged in DMs. The discussion shifts to a factual note about the Iron Dome, stating that it has three main companies involved in hosting, overseeing, maintaining, and keeping it operational. The three companies are listed as Rafael.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't know who Jonathan is. Let me just give you Speaker 1: a little credit, man. This guy, again, like Ian and Sam Parker, there are very few people who have this gift that Jonathan has, and he I think he might have it better than he's, like, on the level with truth teller. His ability to recite stuff. I sat down with him for what was it, like, five hours, Jonathan. This dude, like, at one point, I was like, bro, I don't think I've talked in the last hour. He's like, oh, shit. I'm so sorry, bro. And I'm like, no, dude. You're fucking killing it, but I need to I need to drink a water or a smoke or something. Like and he's like, alright. My bad. My bad. I was like, no, dude. You're fucking on fire, bro. Like, don't stop, man. So he's been absolutely killing it. I just sent him all Speaker 2: the I photos to felt so bad for your editors, dude. I was like, they've got so much to clip here. I feel so bad for editors. But, I appreciate I again, I appreciate you coming and and doing that. That was very kind. But Well, Speaker 1: the only thing my editors don't like, Jonathan, is the fact that your that your username is tie changed three times because you keep getting deplatformed. So they're like, bro, you make a completely different name every time. I'm like, bro, just stick with the same one. So when I search for you, I can figure out, oh, yeah. He's got a new one. There it is. But no. It's always something different. Oh, they find me that. Speaker 2: Now you went Speaker 1: to a different vendor with big boobs. Did you see the big boob one? That's funny. What happened to the big tape, girl? Yeah. Don't Speaker 2: I did. That is good. The Israeli girl. I had so many people in my DMs. I'm like, I promise I'm not the one. This is not this is not the slide into my DMs for you right now. But anyway Speaker 1: Rebecca, right beyond. But yeah. Speaker 2: Yeah. So the Iron Dome has basically three main companies that are involved with hosting it, overseeing it, maintenance, and making sure it's operational at all times. And those three companies are Speaker 1: Rafael
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript strings together a series of fragmented remarks from multiple speakers, centered on conspiracy theories, political organizing, and media manipulation. Key points include: - Identity and information sources: Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 repeatedly ask, “Who the fuck is Jeremy?” and “Who the fuck is Jonathan?” about where they get information and why they deleted “karaoke,” signaling concern about sources and prior online activity. Speaker 3 later directs audiences to Jeremy Oliver on YouTube and Under “Onslaught Media Group” to see footage from protests, implying a push to present an alternative narrative to mainstream media. - Wisconsin as a pivot point: Speaker 2 describes Wisconsin as the place where “the evidence that I and my associate, Chris, had put together for Peter” was first presented under oath before the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity. This is presented as a foundational moment in informing their views on elections. - Protests and media strategy: Several speakers reference attending or planning protests, streaming live coverage, and promoting First Amendment rights. There is urging to go to the capital today or on Friday, with claims of “the real story” beyond mainstream media. - Alleged coalition and political actors: The Flynn network, Ali Alexander, and Michael Flynn are named as central figures in a supposed strategy to create political instability and a “color revolution.” The discussion enumerates a supposed chain: the Flynn network’s ties to Patrick Byrne (founder of the America Project) and Roger Richards, who allegedly produced propaganda with Jordan Sather; Patrick Byrne’s connections to Stanley McChrystal; Flynn’s alleged legal or organizational registrations tied to McChrystal’s home; and involvement with the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system for countering opposing viewpoints. - Information warfare and messaging: The speakers describe a broader plan involving “compliant independent media,” the spread of allegations of election fraud, and the mobilization of tens of thousands for protests. Brian Gamble (CIO of the America Project) is named as someone trained in information warfare and psychological operations; Emily Newman is described as having ties to the US Agency for Global Media, with ties to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, framed as propaganda. - Election numbers and fraud claims: There is discussion of 2020 Maricopa County in-person voting figures (395,000 on election day, described as a lowball estimate due to COVID), with speculation about how many Republicans intended to vote but did not, and varying projections about missed voters (600k–700k mentioned, with some estimates around 150k). The comparison to midterms is used to argue about turnout patterns and perceived discrepancies. - Corporate and elite affiliations: References are made to the Rockefellers in connection with Scott Pressler, suggesting a linkage to supposedly nefarious finance and influence. There is a claim that Rockefeller money went directly to Scott, raising suspicions about funding sources and influence. - Personal safety and conduct: A speaker narrator describes intimidating behavior and the idea of exposing anonymous online actors through burner accounts to unmask traders and create real-world consequences, highlighting a motivation to disrupt online anonymity and safety. - Personal disclosures and reactions: Several speakers shift abruptly into frictional or confrontational exchanges (e.g., someone leaving a conversation, questions about conversations with Mike Lindell), illustrating tense, emotionally charged exchanges during the interactions. Overall, the transcript weaves together themes of alternative information channels, a claimed historical pivot in Wisconsin, a supposed Flynn-run strategy to destabilize the political system, allegations of media and government ties to propaganda or information warfare, and contentious discussions about election integrity, organizers, and elite affiliations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke? Speaker 1: Who the fuck is Jonathan? Where does he get his information? Why did he delete karaoke? Speaker 2: It's been a blessing. We've been able to share incredible amounts of information, and it really kinda changed the game for me as far as, like, a sense of purpose in this because most people don't know this. But, you know, Wisconsin was the first state that the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, you know, under oath in, you know, a senate. I think it was the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity. It's the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity. Speaker 3: So now I've I've got another YouTube page up. I've got another personal Facebook page up. You can find me on Facebook at Jeremy Oliver on YouTube. I'm Onslaught Media Group. And and, you know, there you can go and see at the last protesting. Speaker 4: Using other state capitals for practice dry runs. Speaker 1: We're basically ready to storm the capital with us in a couple of minutes. We're all actors, but I wanna direct and act. Speaker 3: Get the real story if you watch mainstream media. So as a journalist, as a news producer, I'm going just to stream live and and show exactly what's going on at the protest and and really just support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights people. Speaker 1: Patrick, why won't you speak to me about Mary Fenix? Do you wanna go? Do wanna leave now? Why why can't I speak to him about Mary Fanning? He don't want to. Okay. But now How do feel you're cheating? I was in the middle of a conversation with him. Who are you? Conversation's over. Who are you? Speaker 5: And Donald Trump has no business being president. He's a and Donald Trump has no business being president. He's a Speaker 1: and Donald Trump has no business being president. He's a Speaker 5: With it in this coalition super think tank of Biden, Harris, a couple intellectual figure behind them, I'm not even gonna name, put Mike Flynn in there and two economists. One economist is a democrat, and his name is Simon Johnson. And he's we're friendly. Haven't talked to him in a couple years. He was the chief economist of the IMF. English man by birth, Speaker 3: I think There, I first of all, I I encourage you to get out to the capital today or to on Friday. Speaker 4: Brian Gamble is the CIO of the America Project, which was founded by Patrick Byrne, who sits on the Council of Foreign Relations with Stanley McChrystal, Flynn's mentor. And apparently, they're so close that Flynn registered the company, Flynn Intel Group, from the home of Stanley McChrystal. And Stanley McChrystal is an advisor for the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects communications from President Trump trending on social media and then finds the most effective opposing viewpoints. And then the system shares the opposing viewpoints. Same thing they're doing with the Flynn network to target the Patriot movement. Speaker 6: This is unbelievable. Unbelievable. I I feel like I'm living a dream right now. Speaker 1: Out of my way. I'm leaving. I mean, my kid is opening. Don't touch me and get out of my way. I'm leaving. So I'll give him a quick answer. Come on. You're right. The reason I walk away because your question's ridiculous. Conversation. Producer of all these I have no idea. You're tasked with dentist conversation you had with Mike Lindell. Don't trust about some conversation with Mike Lindell. No problem. Like, loves to ask it. It's a question. I have no idea. No. No. It's funny Don't trust this guy. Don't trust me. Ah, okay. So the man get the out of my way. I'm going to the parking garage. What a ridiculous response. Get away from me, man. Is this the direction to the parking lot? Both of you get away from me. Speaker 3: And if you can't make that, then get out in your neighborhood. Protest with some other people. Speaker 0: You have Speaker 1: not not nothing to worry about. Speaker 7: There's always faking moves. Never making moves. Acid shake bottles pop. The government is breaking down, you fools. Speaker 8: The entire Flynn network was there. Ali Alexander, a former CMP member, was a lead organizer. And Michael Flynn, who appeared on the CMP staff roster, gave an address as we know. But the idea of everything leading up to this day was all about creating instability as they're trying to carry out a color revolution. Some of some of the things on this list that completely define who the Flynn network is, a united and organized opposition, an ability quickly to drive home the point that voting results are falsified, compliant independent media to inform citizens about the falsified vote, incapable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators to protest the electoral fraud. Does this sound familiar? Speaker 9: Think about 2020 and what showed up on game day in Maricopa, not including drop offs, just in day day versus what happened in the midterms. Speaker 10: Well, 2020, they reported 395,000 in person voters on election day, which they themselves admitted was a a lowball figure due to the COVID pandemic. Okay. Speaker 9: Was that statewide or in Maricopa County? Speaker 10: That's Maricopa alone. Speaker 9: Right. And so therefore, we're supposed to believe that there was a hundred, two hundred fifty thousand in a midterm. I mean, so what is your guess? What is your projection of how many Republicans had the intent to cast a ballot but did not cast a ballot in Maricopa County? Speaker 10: That's a little bit of a speculation, but I would believe it would be every bit if it would be every bit of 700,000 probably, and it would be every bit of 700,000 probably in 700,000, probably in Maricopa given the population demographics, the growth, the expectation of surge and turnout on election day, as well as how polarizing this midterm election was gonna be. Speaker 6: Tyler? Yeah. I mean Speaker 9: 700 sounds that sounds high. Speaker 6: Of what was missed or what was Speaker 9: What was missed? The total? I I think a 150,000 was probably missed. Speaker 6: Yeah. I mean, look. I mean, here's the reality is it's it's well within the within the belief. If you've if you've seen what's happened, you look at the numbers here and what the projections and estimations were. I mean, the drop offs were really high, and they ended up bending more towards Democrats than we thought they would. Speaker 8: The America Project, another group associated with Flynn. We've got Patrick Byrne who did deep rig with Michael Flynn and Roger Richards who literally has a tattoo that represents Lucifer on his neck and has created propaganda space films with Jordan Sather to take you away from Christ. We've got Emily Newman who also had ties to the US Agency for Global Media, where Hillary Clinton and John Kerry were board members and directors. That reads as an independent agency of the United States government that broadcast news and information vital to US national interest. Basically sounds like propaganda. And then we have Brian Gamble, the CIO of America Projects, who boast about being trained in information warfare and psychological operations. Speaker 0: Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke? Speaker 1: Is that part of the sign up? What are you at liberty to say? Or is it a bunch of Well, let let me just tell you the truth. You know, I'm tied to information, and it comes out of a group, called the, Army of Northern Virginia. K? Yep. Now this is a group of military intelligence specialists of over 800 people. Speaker 11: Then I give a fuck about any fucking person in the Trump administration being upset with giving them, oh, how dare you? Like, you you guys have no fucking idea to list the bodies that we have. Like, if we were serial killers, it would be like, I don't know, Mal or something. What everybody needs to do is get in like, emotionally detached from your e personas, number one. And if that means you have to create a bunch of alt accounts to hide your main account, but everybody needs to be creating burner accounts for the purposes of unmasking all of these traders and making them feel IRL consequences and the threat of IRL consequences because the things that they do behind the privilege of anonymity, we force the issue. And they realize Twitter is no longer a safe place for them. I'm not gonna go sit at the fucking Pentagon in Arlington and just go click buttons and subvert a bunch of people in a fucking cubicle with a big screen in front of me and a dude wearing, you know, some marine uniform with a bunch of metals that he didn't fucking earn. That person needs to be interrupting and saying, yeah, boss. I I can't do this anymore. My kids and my address just fucking wound up on this platform. How the fuck did they find out who I am? That's what the government needs to think about the every time they log in, they need to have second fucking thoughts. They need to be terrified. Security clearances don't mean a goddamn thing to me. I don't give a fuck. Speaker 1: Guy's intimidating me. He's pushing me. Alright. Where's your vehicle? It's in the garage. Hey. What is your name? Are you working for the hotel? I'm working. Tell me. Speaker 0: This is your name. You are Obviously, the connections to the Rockefellers are super sus. Super sus. Speaker 1: So what would you to be more Speaker 0: like Scott Pressler? Well, it sounds like I should just totally sell out because then I would just be, like, totally taken care of by the very people that we're trying to fight against. I mean, the Rockefellers the Rockefellers do not just, like, take up causes that are noble and justifiable. Okay? Mean, like, the Rockefellers are some of the most nefarious people that you can find in American history. And for them to have, like, directly given money like, it's not like they gave indirectly through, another organization. Like, they gave to Scott directly. So, like, how did he get into a room with the Rockefeller family? Speaker 12: Always trying to get to the bottom of is that strip away whatever money's coming in, strip away all that kind of stuff of who we theorize fellers and the rest of it. Charlie Kirk is telling you, in his own words, that he believes the way we are going to beat the system is to literally do all of the same things that got us into this place, that built the system more, but more. It's not even like, oh, we're gonna do them and now we're gonna perform the system. They don't they're telling you in their own words, and Chris always talks about this, they have no desire to reform the system. They just want to control the system and control you through it, and they're now just telling you that. Speaker 0: It's the vote harder harder. And they are the organization. Speaker 1: Yeah. I Speaker 12: mean, it's just amazing that they're saying. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I was so I was just checking up to see what happened in Wisconsin, and it's fascinating to me that democrats would elect this supreme court justice. Speaker 6: I mean, Oak Lake, it looks Speaker 0: like she's gonna win handily, but then itself would also pass voter ID by a wide margin, which is, like, not Democrat issue at all. Like Yeah. We we just talked about that a little bit. Okay. So I'll have to go back in time and just watch it and scream at the television. But You're absolutely right, though. Yeah. Yeah. It doesn't make any sense. Yeah. Yes. Speaker 13: And I know you had been involved in Speaker 14: Was mother rushed out to the case? And I, you know, I don't know anything about it. It's not my world. She just reached out cold? She reached out cold? Wow. And, and I spoke to her at great length, and it and it scared the crap out of me. Kid was clearly killed by somebody. That was my conclusion, objectively, with no skin in the game. Speaker 13: And you after reading the latest report? Yes. Like, look. And I Speaker 14: immediately called a member of congress from California, Roe Con, and said, this is crazy. You gotta look into this. And nothing ever happened. Speaker 1: Of course not. Cal Rokok. Come on. Again, Speaker 13: I think this is I I feel strange and sad debating this and having You are a little bit accusing me, but, You Speaker 1: are a Speaker 12: little this isn't a debate. You're you're accusing me. You're accusing me. See, what he's trying to do is he's trying to build sympathy.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

I’m still waiting on an answer from your degenerate bitch ass friend Maze. She started this back in September, defamed me, screamed at me unprovoked in public spaces like a banshee, bullied me and defamed my FAMILY and has acted like a victim for months, yet continuously LIES about everything. She wants to continue doing this, Make sure she fucking understands that I DONT BLUFF. I will sue her to the fucking ground if she, or any one of her bitch ass “friends” like Trillion conspire to defame me again. I already saw the 15 page write up of made up LIES that @Trillion0x sent @AndrewTHTravel as a threat to me months back. She should know that Trillion is a LIAR, and make sure he knows I will sue the F out of him too. Hi Val. 👋 Loved the bit about me “goin to rehab” except I’ve never been to rehab in MY FUCKING LIFE. She came for my FAMILY and it’s obvious this BITCH needs to be put in her place. She doesn’t know who she’s dealing with and she has managed to really piss me off. I don’t play dirty like she does, I have enough self respect to not ge scrapping on the ground like a 2 cent whore. Fuck around and Find out Maze. Keep MY FAMILY, especially MY SENIOR CITIZEN AMERICAN TAX PAYING PARENTS OUT OF YOUR FILFTHY MOUTH. Keep saying shit like I was involved with Trafficking at USAID…. keep doing it and she won’t like how I strike back. I can assure you, SHE’s GOING TO REGRET IT.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Your account is FAKE AF MAZE. @MazeLove14 Full of BOTS. We came across a TON of them in the last few days… keep being proud of being a giant fraud. what are you so afraid of? Your account is so artifically boosted that you felt the need to block my “tiny account.” Make that shit

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 9:43 PM

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

NAG - Ryan Matta - Maze - Tim Ballard Lmao 🤣 THIS EXPLAINS ALOT. Maze’s loser sidekick, Coyote has rocks for brains and thought it was a good idea to accept Ryan Matta’s directive to try and smear me. This occured right after I exposed that Bukele’s BTC paradise in El Salvador is a giant fraud and racket, back in September. Ryan didn’t even address the huge issues with the narrative he’s been pushing, he straight blocked me. Then stated that “he’d take a bullet for his President Bukele.” 😑 One person did show up to Ryan’s defense almost immediately… and that was none other than @MazeLove14. I thought this was very odd. The next day, she shows up to Keith’s Space and starts screaming at me like a banshee and accusing me of all sorts of lies. Turns out I wiped the floor with Coyote when I proved that Maze and Coyote were lying about being out of their NAG contract. It also proves that NAG is also working with Ryan Matta, Tim Ballard (Knight of Malta & Mormon) and Sam Parker (Fed Mormon).

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes Tim Ballard as having worked with Glenn Beck to build Underground Railroad, portraying Beck as Ballard’s close ally whenever Ballard needed to break a story on child trafficking. When Ballard considered running for Senate and would have likely won with momentum after the Sound of Freedom release, attacks began, and Glenn Beck reportedly “threw him under the bus.” Speaker 0 asserts that Beck pledged allegiance to Israel, is “bought and paid for,” and “Israel's bitch,” claiming Ballard watched a video and realized this. Speaker 1 adds a claim about theSound of Freedom narrative: the child trafficking ring Ballard busted in South America, depicted in the movie, was an Israeli-run sex trafficking ring, run by Israelis. The head of that ring allegedly escaped to Portugal where a judge let him go, and nobody knows where this guy ended up. The speakers state that this is the real story of Sound of Freedom and that “It was an Israeli run sex trafficking ring,” noting that this is not told to the audience and urging others to research it. Speaker 1 then transitions to commentary on Twitter, stating that Twitter is not a free speech platform and is not an open information highway; it is a military application, a propaganda operation, highly bodied, highly artificial, highly synthetic, and manipulated. They acknowledge using it daily but emphasize that not everything is as it seems on the platform. They caution that prominent accounts cannot be taken at face value because campaigns are run, the algorithm is manipulated, and there are bots and unauthentic accounts. The speakers urge awareness of the battlefield on which Twitter is engaged, and advise developing a wary eye toward content, encouraging audiences to examine profiles, retweets, boosts, follows, and networks to understand who is using the same messaging and why.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know what's funny, Sam? It's because Tim Ballard was in, when I first met him, he was going through all this, like, crazy law fair. And the one part was, like, Glenn Beck helped him build Underground Railroad. Right? Like, they were best friends. Every time Sam needed or or Tim needed to break a story or talk about child trafficking, Glenn Beck was, like, his fucking dude. Right? And then when it came time that when when Tim was contemplating running for senate, running for the senate or running for congress, and they knew that he would win with all of the momentum that he had after the sound of freedom release. He was almost a shoo in, and I forget what politician that he was going to upset or he was gonna remove from power. But that's when all the attacks started. And after those attacks started, Glenn Beck just threw him under the bus, and he said, man, I can't believe that Glenn would fucking do that to me. And that is the exact video I showed him. I'm like, bro, dude, the dude was, like, pledging allegiance to Israel. He's fucking bought and paid for. He's not your friend. He's controlled by our intelligence agencies. He's Israel's bitch. And he and he watched that one video, and he Speaker 1: was like, Speaker 0: holy fuck. Speaker 1: Ryan, you might know this. You probably know this. Most people don't probably don't know this. The child ring that's, that Tim Ballard busted up in South America that's portrayed in the movie, Sound of Freedom, it was an Israeli run sex trafficking ring. Okay? It was run by Israelis. Okay? And the head of that ring escaped to Portugal where a judge basically let him go, and nobody knows where this guy ended up. Right? So that's that's the real story of Sound of Freedom. It was an Israeli run sex trafficking ring. You're not told that. You should go for research and go find out about it. That's who was running the ring. So lot of interest. It's always it's always them, man. It always comes back to them. It just it just seems to always come back to them. Speaker 0: Every single time. Every single time. It's like 6,000,000 to one odds, you know. It's just strange how that happens. But you wanna wrap it up, Sam? Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's we'll just wrap it up. Listen, everybody. Twitter is not a free speech platform. It is not a an open, you know, super highway of information, information super highway. It is a military application. It is a propaganda operation. It is highly bodied, highly artificial, highly synthetic and manipulated. And I'm not saying don't use it. I use it every day. We absolutely must use it as best we can, but I need everybody to be aware that not everything is as it seems on this platform. Okay. You cannot take this platform at face value. Many of the people, the big accounts that these mainstream accounts that you see coming through your feet all the time, you cannot take them at face value. You must be aware that they're running campaigns. They're being paid. They're being boosted. The algorithm is being manipulated. There's all sorts of bots and unauthentic accounts and fake accounts. You must be aware of the battlefield on which you're engaging. Okay. And I'm not telling you to go leave. No, on the contrary, I want you here. I want you battling, but it is not what it seems. It is not what you might think. Yeah. There's a lot of smoke and mirrors and shadows and espionage and spy games going on on this platform. And you really need to be aware of that. You need to get savvy to it. And I don't want you to like, you know, develop a mistrust of everybody. That's not what I want. But I do want you to develop a more wary eye of what's going on. I want you to look at people's Twitter profiles. I want you to scroll through their feeds and see who they're retweeting, who they're boosting, who they're following, who their little networks are, who's using the same messaging. Why? Because Speaker 0: they
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a heated online space, the participants debate organizational affiliations, personal insults, and questions about narratives surrounding international events. The core points are: - Contract with NAG: Speaker 1 confirms that “we severed” or “didn’t make the cut” with the group referred to as NAG, indicating a break in alignment. When pressed for specifics, they note the date and details are unclear, mentioning it “has been a month.” Payments or compensation are touched on briefly, with Speaker 2 asking if someone is being paid by others, and Speaker 1 replying with a noncommittal remark about a banner or check mark. - Identity and credibility disputes: The dialogue includes strong personal accusations and defenses over Christian identity, history, and authenticity. A moment centers on an Orthodox Christian icon being attacked, with Speaker 0 emphasizing they are Christian and criticizing another participant’s approach to Christianity. This thread quickly devolves into name-calling and claims about knowledge of Christian history, with insults and counter-insults about piety and background. - Media portrayal and allegations of manipulation: Speaker 2 accuses the group of being “counter, to be basically the controlled opposition” and questions potential contractual pressure. They refer to smear videos and claim others are posting content to discredit them. The discussion includes claims of being targeted by large accounts and accusations of gaslighting and manipulation. - El Salvador and Bukele narrative: A key point raised by Speaker 2 involves skepticism about the State Department narrative on El Salvador and Bukele. They state the world doesn’t revolve around Ryan Mata and say their own research raises questions about why certain narratives persist, insisting they did not attack Ryan Mata and did not tag him, but simply asked questions about the situation. - Social media dynamics and conflicts: The exchange includes a back-and-forth about who blocked whom, who controls whom, and who is “bullied” or being treated unfairly. The participants describe smear videos, blocking behavior, and the impact of public accounts with large followings. There are accusations that others “babysit” spaces or inject themselves into conversations with an agenda. - Specific confrontations and accusations: Speaker 2 recounts being accused of bullying and being attacked for asking questions about El Salvador; Speaker 1 responds by accusing Speaker 2 of seeking attention and of being a chaos agent. The dialogue includes repeated clashes over who said what, with emphasis on truth-seeking versus smearing. - Tone and escalation: The conversation alternates between attempting to ask clarifying questions and eruptions of hostility, with terms like “heritic,” “liberal,” “block,” and “gaslighting” used repeatedly. The participants express frustration at being misunderstood, misrepresented, or blocked from collaborative discussion, culminating in mutual admonitions and exasperation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm family. Look Speaker 1: at the one that the first little picture on the left or whatever, we did the symbology thing, and he just flipped out whenever he was asked the question instead of, like, just giving a calm answer of why the hand aligns perfectly where and it goes to that little slot or whatever. I'll I'll send it to you. But But I'm saying he freaked out just like that, and he came after that lady just like that. Can you that it's fine. It's fine. Can you it's fine. Speaker 0: I don't care. Ian, can you mute him for a sec? Because the guy goes to attack an orthodox Christian icon, right, of the lord and savior Jesus Christ. I'm a Christian. Speaker 1: I'm I'm not Speaker 0: This guy is a supposed Christian. All he knows about Christianity is the King chain King James bible and a John Hatchee sermon or a Kenneth Copeland sermon. I'm not gonna talk to someone whose Christianity goes back a hundred years maximum, and it's about really financed by Jews. Learn something about Christian history before you open open up your mouth, you heretic. Hopefully, Ian, we can move on. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's go to James Kopel. And then we'll go to sir Eskenard for the the closing remarks. Speaker 2: Hey. So how's it going everybody? I was in and out of the space. So I'm to understand that you guys severed your contract with this whatever group, NAG. Is that is that what what's the consensus here? Speaker 1: Yeah. We didn't make the cut or what I don't know. I think our my my no. My not ideology is doesn't align with Uh-huh. Something or whatever. Speaker 2: So when the when the when the when Speaker 1: the was the severed, Speaker 2: can please give a date? Because Whatever Torbaugh evaded that question yesterday when she came at me guns blazing. I'm curious. What what the suburb? Speaker 1: When I lost the little check mark, I mean, Speaker 2: I don't Speaker 1: care. The banner thing. I wanna know. I don't know. I gotta go look. Speaker 2: What This is Speaker 1: been, like, a month. Speaker 2: Oh, it's been a month. Okay. Speaker 1: A month. Speaker 2: Month. Okay. That's interesting. Yeah. Are you being paid by anybody else by any chance? No. Mhmm. Speaker 1: Or x, like, a $80.89 dollars, like, sometimes. Speaker 2: Okay. Well, find I I Speaker 1: that program. Speaker 2: Because Speaker 1: I know you go around, like, digging into rhyme out of shit, and everybody's shit. That's what you do. Speaker 2: Not fucking put words in my mouth because but you and Mays and other people have tried to do that. No. Speaker 1: I'm Why is everybody talking about Mays, bro? She's not even here. Speaker 2: Asked a question because, the media narrative okay. This the the world doesn't revolve around Ryan. Okay? I asked a valid question because something seemed off to me about the story about what's going on in El Salvador and Bukele, okay? It seemed to me like the State Department never shut down, okay? That's the media narrative. That also happens to be Ryan's narrative. Okay? Regardless, I never attacked him. I never tagged him in anything. I never called him out. But so, I asked this question on the October 9. The following day, Speaker 1: you Speaker 2: posted some video, some smear video of me perpetually blocked, trying to Speaker 1: Yeah. DM'd you. You're know about this. Speaker 2: I'm not finished. Trying to Speaker 1: Tension speak. You're attention speaking, bro. I already said this. Speaker 2: Off. No. Yeah. You you you you you Speaker 1: you Don't stutter. Don't stutter. Just calm down, breathe. Speaker 2: Come at people, you know, because, like, trying to belittle us and call us bullies with our tiny accounts when you know what? At least I have integrity. I don't Speaker 1: You go around searching for people to to find shit with their account. You're one of those accounts, bro. Speaker 2: Me? Because I called out DDG Sarah? Because she fucking denies Speaker 1: I don't I don't even know you did that, but that's another one. That's another one. Speaker 2: Rant. Ugh, dude. You have you're you're Speaker 1: eating Breathe. Speaker 2: Have rocks for brains, or you're willfully ignorant. Which one is it, Coyote? No. You're a fucking asshole. Speaker 1: I may be ignorant. I may be pretty smart and see through the bullshit. Speaker 2: Fucking talk because May's fucking drowned me out yesterday, and she she even was like, you've been talking for thirty minutes. I hadn't even been speaking for four minutes. No. And she came out me bullying me and calling me a bully and divisive and whatever. And I'm like, no, I'm seeking the truth. Because I think that you guys are putting up guardrails. There there's a there's a little bit of a something going on here because. Speaker 1: What what else do you wanna ask me then? Stop. Speaker 2: Ask me. Interrupting me. Because why the would you put, what, who told you to make that video and post it to question me? I had, you had nothing to do with anything. I never called out Rayamada. I asked a question simply about what is going on in El Salvador because this narrative doesn't make sense based on my own research and based on things that I know about that country. Why is that why is that so controversial? Why is that so controversial? Because literally Speaker 1: Did I answer? Speaker 2: No. No. Not yet. Because not only that happens. Okay. You posting some, you know, week out, week sauce video trying to discredit me because I get, oh no. Ryan Dawson blocked me because oh no, I called him out for literally claiming Doctor Christopher Bolt. Speaker 1: That's another Speaker 2: one. Doctor Christopher Bolin's work. He literally tried to like claim the work of the man who solved nineeleven as his own. Yes, I called him out and he blocked me. You know who else he's blocked? He's blocked Gen X girl, he's blocked Whitney Webb. Oh, so yeah, I'm sorry. I think I'm pretty proud of that block because I'm sorry. I'm not gonna allow somebody that's worse than plagiarism. So fuck you. If you're gonna fucking try and smear me and and what for asking a question or for pointing out when somebody's lying. But in this case with Ryan, Ryan, it had nothing to do with Ryan Mata. I asked a question about El Salvador. He was not, I did not tag him. I did not attack him. And I have maintained that. Speaker 1: You did a whole face. Speaker 2: I have maintained that despite the fact that you guys have been going around babysitting my ass, any space that I come in, and listening to what I have to say. And then coming at me just like you did, trying to attack me and saying and putting words in my mouth Speaker 1: You're not a victim. I am Speaker 2: I have attacked Ryan and I never did. And you know what? I only merely asked the question, how does Ryan react? He blocks me. He blocked me. Okay, Coyote. So why the fuck are you taking his side? And it had no Speaker 1: because that's my boy. I do I do the same for Sarah Espadaro and Ian. If you do when you do that. Why don't you come why don't you Speaker 2: ask me a question instead of doing right, putting up a smear video? Because you know what? I don't like this logical fallacy that you guys are spreading. Oh, we didn't align. We don't align with the, you know, NAG's, you know, ideology. We're, you know, anti Zionist. No, you know what? I think they gave you a contract to be counter, to be basically the controlled opposition. Why would why Speaker 1: why Okay. So have we have have I DM'd you have I DM'd you about this? You know what? Now have I DM'd you about this? Speaker 2: Up. You know what? Speaker 1: Know know what? You're one of those accounts that Speaker 2: up for once. I got talked over and bullied yesterday, and I'm not gonna let that fucking happen again. I am so sick of you fucking Speaker 1: Please stop with the liberal shit. Speaker 2: Fuck up. No. You need to be put in your fucking place because yesterday, I tolerated that shit, and I'm not gonna tolerate that ever again. Being bullied by, like, 100,000 follower accounts, and then me, little old me, who's just looking for the truth. Look, I'm looking, I ask a question and then you, you post a thing trying to smear me. Like how dare you? And you know what else happened? There was another member of your little click that actually threatened someone, a friend of mine, and said back off Ryan Mata. I'd like to know what the fuck is going on. Are you guys being paid by him? Because you know what? What? You know? Oh, what? What? Oh, now you're gonna be you're gonna you're you're gonna you're gonna, you know, act out Speaker 1: I don't know. I have no recollection of that of what happened right there. Speaker 2: Even fucking give us a date of when the you Speaker 1: Alright. I'm fix I'm fixing to I'm fixing to do you. Okay. Here. Your car So I okay. So I I DM'd you about this days ago. Did I not? Speaker 2: Questions. Why? Why? Speaker 1: I thought you guys Because this is you're you're try Speaker 2: me questions. Why don't you share a space with me and be like, what did you find? Let's see if we can, you know Okay. Speaker 1: Can I ask you questions? Speaker 2: Instead, you go straight for the smear. Speaker 1: So I can't Speaker 2: Somebody is giving you direction. It's fucking obvious, and stop lying. I'm tired of a shit. Like, you guys have no spine. You think you can fucking deflect and, like, you know, not really answer question. Speaker 1: We're shit. Not gonna win this. Okay. So I DM'd you about this two days ago, and then you bring it you bring it up now. Why? You want attention. You're you want attention. Speaker 2: I don't want Speaker 1: And you're playing the victim. Little old me, you just said. You quote, unquote, little old me. Speaker 2: I have 5,000 fucking followers, motherfucker. That there's a difference, and you guys are calling me the bully? Oh, you Speaker 1: can't give me I'll follow. Speaker 2: Fuck off, man. Don't gaslight me. I'm sick of this gaslighting. You really have some nerve. You know what? You're making an ass out of yourself, not me. I have everything. Speaker 1: Look, bro. When I come up here to be humble and people come up here to tag me, this is what you fucking do. Speaker 2: Lying to the audience because why the fuck? Who fucking told you to make that video? It had nothing to do with you. It Speaker 1: I made the video because you're a cup because you you brag about being blocked by multiple large accounts. Alls everybody has to do is go to your account and type in the word block blocks. And they'll see that this is what you do. You're a chaos agent. A chaos agent? And you're a liberal, come to find out. Speaker 2: Fucking liberal? Oh. Oh, look at this. Look at look what he's doing, dude. Oh my god. Oh, I'm a left Why Speaker 1: do you follow me? What she follows me. Why do you follow me? I I'm spineless, but you followed me. Speaker 2: That was before you know what? Speaker 1: I That was before what? Five minutes ago? Speaker 2: Remember that stupid fucking video, and I was like, wait a second. This doesn't line up. He said that he fucking severed the contract. Speaker 1: You answered my DM the fucking when I told you about the the video? Speaker 2: Yeah. You tried to play it off. Like, you yeah. You're like, oh, yeah. My bad, man. My bad. Speaker 1: Do y'all not see this? Like, just a perfect example, bro. I'm done. Speaker 2: The wall, dude. Fuck you. Speaker 1: You

@mexfinanciero - Mercenario Financier⭕️

@Meowllian @TimmyGs_312 @YoteOfStreet is a recently converted JEW who should not be taken serious at all

Saved - January 26, 2026 at 7:12 PM

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

𓂀 What are the Knights of Pythia? ♖ NXIVM ♘ Seth Rich ♙ Seth Green ♗ Schumer ♕ Podesta’s ♔ Gaga and who else? Who the hell is Jeremy Oliver? https://t.co/AZchhAmDLo

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Wellness Company owns NAG thru Flatiron Holdings Ltd. The Flatiron Building in Indianapolis was called the Knights of Pythias Building. Are Knights of Pythias behind NAG? https://t.co/aimlMQ1TEx

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

Knights of Pythias in a parade in Racine, Wisconsin, ca. 1910

Saved - January 26, 2026 at 12:01 PM

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Wellness Company owns NAG thru Flatiron Holdings Ltd. The Flatiron Building in Indianapolis was called the Knights of Pythias Building. Are Knights of Pythias behind NAG? https://t.co/aimlMQ1TEx

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

Knights of Pythias in a parade in Racine, Wisconsin, ca. 1910 https://t.co/QAQadWK4mS

Saved - January 26, 2026 at 11:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
JC is tied to the Flynn network in multiple ways: he attacked me after Ryan Matta visited, then inexplicably got a new Iphone after I exposed LDS Inc as a Freemasonic Zionist racket. He defends Freemasonry; his family is NASA; he and Fringe speak Freemasonic “RITE” language. He tested “election integrity” in SWISSCON-SIN, run by Flynn, Oliver, Byrne; Knights of Pythia oath to Racine. I doubt the arrest and feel grift. After supporting him with hundreds, he betrays me. F this.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Pretty much. JC is tied to the Flynn network in more than one way. He started coming at me full tilt, Gangstalking me, slandering me RIGHT after Ryan Matta visited him, then he mysteriously gets a brand new Iphone17S+ out of nowhere (after months of claiming he eats nothing but ritz crackers and peanut butter 🤌🏽) and why? Because I was exposing that the LDS Inc is one big fat giant Freemasonic Zionist racket and also proved that anyone not looking into the Mormons while blaming “the Jews” is either lying to themselves or part of a larger conspiracy on this app. (Also true) JC is also a staunch defender of Freemasonry and his entire family is NASA, he’s also a self admitted Freemason himself along with Fringe who réponds to him in not so coded Freemasonic “RITE” language . He went to SWISSCONSIN first to test out his “election integrity” BS psyop (Run by Flynn, Jeremy Oliver and Patrick Byrne) … which is coincidentally where Knights of Pythia go to be initiated and swear an oath to protect Racine. I also have my doubts about this “arrest,” it feels like a manufactured pity party to either grift some more and garner sympathy… funny how they staged a similar thing for Tim Ballard a few years back. That account people think is his mother isn’t his mother either, it’s just one more burner account. What kind of mother would post about her son’s arrest on X? None. Because it’s all lies. He’s made shit up many times in the past: claimed he doesn’t know Jeremy Oliver or Patrick Byrne. More lies. He even made up some BS story that I had conspired to “suppress” his voice and claims I collaborate with IDF.::. Again: COMPLETE LIES. Dude has more than a couple screws loose and is 100% a malignant narcissist sociopath. After Months of supporting him and donating HUNDREDS of Dollars —- THIS is how he treats me. F this giant Turd from Alabama.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 notes that Wisconsin was the first state where the evidence he and his associate Chris had put together for Peter was presented under oath in a senate committee. The presentation occurred before the Wisconsin senate committee on election integrity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of purpose in this because most people don't know this, but, you know, Wisconsin was the first state that the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter. Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, you know, under oath in, you know, a senate. I think it was the Wisconsin senate committee on election integrity, something like

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

I’ve already explained myself and quite frankly I was very let down with the way you handled this Fringe, also you Ketty. This BS happened on Nov 2nd. It’s now DECEMBER… and you’re saying Jonathan is the victim here? Maybe you have amnesia, but it’s been nonstop accusations and slandering from his part and harrassment from his little following for over a month now. —> Slandering in GCs, on Spaces, posts, and encouraged by you Fringe. I’m beyond disappointed in you. We used to talk and be friends. What actually happened— - I was cohosting with Keith. HIS space not mine. - I was writing and posting all day long. ONLY occasionally speaking. Go check my timeline. - I wasn’t checking any DMs or GCs. That should have become abundantly clear to ALL of you before assuming I conspired against anyone. - I don’t get notifications for being tagged in GC, I didn’t even know that’s a thing. -what motive would I have to “silence Jonathan” ?! There is none, bc I didn’t. I was sharing and posting under his content consistently up until that awful day. - I have supported Jonathan sending HUNDREDS of dollars over 12 months and was subscribed to his Substack. I even paid for an entire year subscription in advance. I have since cancelled it after being targeted and slandered multiple times by him. - I NEVER SAW ANY MIC REQUEST. Neither did @Americaonly9 - Space panel was FULL. - Keith (the HOST) is exonerated and so was Mud. Goyim United, Victor and Matty were also cohosts at one point, why do they get a pass, but I am the only one that is being accused?! Make that make sense Fringe?! What happened to “stopping bad aura” in your Aces Group Chat, Fringe? You’ve kicked multiple people out of your GC for merely posting a meme or gif you deemed to be “bad aura” …… yet, YOU allowed this slandering, calling me all sorts of names in YOUR CHAT FOR HOURS and you had Nothing to say when I confronted you the next day. NOTHING. 10 hours later, I finally scrolled thru the GC and saw what YOU had permitted 87 people to witness. Now I see you defending this behavior like a HYPOCRITE. You even piled in and added a screenshot of a DM you sent me (implying I was answering DMs when I wasn’t.) - You permitted this harassment in your 87 person GC multiple times since then. When I have remained quiet. - I also had my account “banned in 150 countries,” Jonathan. I didn’t whine like a little biznatch in GCs or go on a rampage demanding my content be shared or accuse anyone of “tAkINg my MiC AwaY” - 6 minute video below of all the heinous accusations Jonathan made in Fringe’s Aces GC. You have the audacity to say I owe him an apology?!! More details which ALL of you omit— - Jonathan’s account was half nuked. He couldn’t post anything, yet was going apeshit in multiple GCs. He didn’t even appear in the removed speakers or in the audience. LATER WHEN VICTOR @IamVictorPerez1 ASKED HIM TO COME UP, HE REFUSED. OUTSTANDING QUESTION—- - Why didn’t any of you take Jonathan’s thread and post it in the purple pill and tag Keith and I? Looking at you @KettyLuvz . I’m also beyond disappointed in you. You actually agreed and archived a lot of my content before that day (even on the LDS) and then you just turned on me and assumed I had committed some conspiracy against Jonathan. - I never said “the Mormons killed CK” you Giant Alabamian Turd, Jonathan. I also have no idea WTF Alladin is. (video below) Keith Kicked the IDF douchebag the moment he said “donate to my givesend go” and “Palestinians are parasites.” Bonus video : Jonathan actually defending freemasonry & Saying Founding Fathers like Benjamin Franklin weren’t “Kabbalistic Masons.” Have you not seen what they found in Franklin’s house in London?! Was that why Ketty slandered Albert Bishai & told Jonathan’s following to block him after Jonathan left from the Space?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Aladdin is discussing Candace Owens and her husband, making several pointed claims about connections and motives. He notes that Candace Owens’ husband is “MI five asset” and emphasizes that he did not say MI six, labeling it as an interesting distinction. He references a 2022 period when there were multiple indications involving her husband, mentioning a firm he was involved with “back in England,” and compares it to Wall Street. The firm is described as “Avenger Capital Fund” or similar, and he claims her husband is “heavily funded by actual other Jewish firms.” From this, he implies that when Candace Owens speaks out, “let's peel off the onion and who's your husband is,” leading to his assertion about her identity and motivations. He characterizes Owens as a “very vile person” who was shunned from the conservative movement and who now spreads conspiracy theories. He recounts a progression of Owens’ claims and videos, noting she started with “the personal guards of Charlie Kirk,” then shifted to other topics, including an Egyptian plane incident with “three Egyptian officers dropped off in Utah” who supposedly didn’t return to the plane, followed by claims about “12 Israeli cell phones.” He mentions that prior to this, there was confusion around “Mikey McCoy” from Tony Point USA, criticizing the lack of evidence and the rapid jumping from one conspiracy to another. He states that Owens released text messages between her and Charlie Kirk, calling them “fake as fuck” or arguing that even if real, they do not prove anything; he suggests the release is a nuisance rather than substantial evidence and critiques Owens’ behavior as “vile.” He adds an impression that Owens’ marriage was arranged for clout, stating, “the only reason they got married is an arranged marriage,” and that he knew her husband. On a broader personal note, he shares his background, saying he grew up in Iraq and emphasizes a controversial, provocative stance: “Palestinians, we call them parasites,” describing a harsh perception of Palestinian people and their influence. He clarifies he is not pro any specific side but expresses pro-American sentiment, and he reiterates his focus on documenting the war in Ukraine, where he is currently based. He mentions a pin post on his profile for GoFundMe donations to support his journey to Ukraine, Israel-Palestine, and Iraq. He closes with a light moment about a coin-toss game among the group, joking about a game with soap, lampshade, and quarters, while noting a temporary drop of a cohost and promising to listen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, alright. Nice. I'm I'm I'm I'm excited to hear that Trump's actually arresting everybody. No. I'm kidding, obviously. Joking. But, yeah, Aladdin, go ahead, my man. And, because I think you were disagreeing with Zanny a little bit, and then, we'll get into it. And I like your post. I toss-up in the nest. Candice Sohun's husband is MI five asset. Notice I didn't say MI six. Interesting. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I'm actually a former intelligence officer for those who does not know in the space. And I'm also in Ukraine right now. I'm trying to document the war and bring you guys, factual shit from the ground in Ukraine. I'm not gonna put any spin to it. By the way, there's a pin post on my on my profile to basically the whole GoFund meeting. You guys can donate to my journey. And after that, I'm gonna go to Israel Palestine. I'm gonna go to Iraq and document basically everything. And yeah. So just follow my journey. If you wanna donate to that, I'll be much appreciated. But as far as Candace Owens, Candace Owens is is absolute fraud. There was multiple indications back in 2022 with our husband, and there was a whatchamacall them? There was like a Speaker 2: What are you trying Speaker 1: to say? There was like some sort of a firm he was involved in back in the Speaker 2: Parley. Speaker 1: What's that? Speaker 2: Was it called Parley or Glorify? Speaker 1: One of those, I think. But he was, like, very involved in in particular different firms. It's similar to, like, Wall Street, but back in in England. Speaker 2: Avenger Capital Fund. Speaker 1: Yeah. And yeah. So he's heavily funded. Her husband is heavily funded by actual other Jewish firms. So when she comes out yeah. When she comes out and was like, and and talk about this whole thing. It was like, okay. Let's peel off the onion and who's your husband is. And that's when you basically end up finding out who's Candace Owen is. But she's a very vile person because she got shunned out of the, I guess, the conservative movement. And now, like, she's spreading all kind of conspiracy theories. Like, literally, she started out with the personal guards of Charlie Cork. Then it was like a because I I've been watching her videos and she started with and and she went from his personal guards. It was like somebody look at his watch, and it was like that that's supposed to be some sort of a an indication or it was like a yeah. Speaker 0: Exactly. Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's take him down. Speaker 3: Hey. Sorry. Sorry, Keith. I gotta drop from cohost for, like, forty five minutes. I'll drop now, and I'll be right back. Speaker 0: Thanks. Cool. Hopefully, you can listen to our my our man observer, cook. Speaker 3: Oh, yeah. Yeah. No. I can listen. Speaker 0: I just Speaker 3: get cohost. So, yeah, I'll drop and listen. Yep. Yep. Okay. Speaker 0: Sounds good, brother. Sorry. Keep going, Aladdin, please. Yeah. And I agree with you. It's it's just endless rabbi holes as I call them the TSI and rabbit holes that Candace is going down. This one, that one, all over the place. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Then then it was like, yeah, an Egyptian plane. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: It's supposed to be an three Egyptian officers dropped off in in Utah and supposedly she had insiders from one of the air force base and three gypsum officers went off the plane. They never got back on. And next thing is, what was the what was the Speaker 0: Then next was like 12 Israeli cell phones or Speaker 1: something. And 12 Israeli cell phones. And and actually before that, it was something else. I I was like, oh, okay. Get it together, lady. I mean, it it Speaker 0: is Yeah. Before that was the Mike McCoy guy or whatever the answer Speaker 1: is going. Yeah. Mikey McCoy. Yeah. Yeah. Mikey McCoy from Tony Point USA. And I was like, okay. Get it together. I mean, you cannot be jumping from one conspiracy to another without having any evidence. Then she start releasing text messages between her and Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0: Those were fake as fuck. Speaker 1: And I honestly, I don't think they're fake. Maybe they are, but why would you release text messages between you and Charlie Kirk, which has nothing to do with the assassination, does not prove anything. It's like the text messages that even if it's real I'm 40. Yeah. Yeah. The text messages she released, that's not proved anything that anybody had it out for Charlie Kirk, and she's just being vile. Like, that woman that woman is being vile. And, actually, I know her husband, and the only reason they got married is an arranged marriage. I knew it. For for a clout. Like, if you guys know doesn't know anything about intelligence, Diaq. Speaker 0: Yep. Tisha, check your Tisha. Go keep going, Aladdin, we'll we'll Gotcha. Gotta go some other hands. But, yeah, it we're keep going on the arranged marriage thing. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. It was like yeah. Her marriage with her husband. Speaker 2: That marriage is to me, it's it's just like it's like Prince Harry and Meghan Markle two point o. Speaker 1: Yes. Exactly. And I have no beef in the game, to be honest with you. I'm not, like, pro or anything. I grew up in Iraq. I'm not pro anything. I'm pro America, to be honest with you. But in Iraq, I was growing up, one thing you guys need to understand, Palestinians, we call them parasites. Like, literally, we call them parasites because anywhere they go, they spread cancer with their victimhood bullshit. And I was like, go fuck yourself. Like, even in Iraq. Speaker 2: Were you talking about Palestinians? Speaker 1: Yeah. Alright. Yeah. Speaker 0: Well Yeah. Did you wanna finish off on why you think Candace Owens' thing was arranged marriage? You just is there, like, anything else you have on it? If not, I'm gonna I wanna just Speaker 1: I honestly, I don't have anything. Speaker 0: What happened? Ask him. I'm gonna ask you something after. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm just gonna be a 100% honest with you guys. I I don't have anything Speaker 2: to No. It's all good. It's all good. Speaker 1: Yeah. But at some point, I may release some documents about her husband. But I am in Ukraine, and I'm focused on my Ukraine mission to document the war. And by the way, if you guys wanna donate to my mission over there, it's pinned into my profile. Speaker 0: Yep. I appreciate it. So my new thing is because I don't need shilling on here. So my new thing, I got my coin ready. Heads is soap. Tails is motherfucker. I dropped it. Where is it? Tails is lampshade. Motherfucker went on the ground. Let me get another fucking coin here. Let's play the game. Ready? Who's got who's got lampshade? Ready? Alright. Boom. Heads. Bar soap. Well, looks like that's two in a row for soap. So Speaker 1: What happened to quarters? Speaker 0: Need a lampshade soon. What's up? Speaker 1: What happened to quarters? Lampshade quarters, honey. Quarter? Speaker 0: Oh. Quarter. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: So we played in college. Quarter. Speaker 0: Oh my god.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss white supremacy and Holocaust narratives, challenging mainstream beliefs and asserting controversial claims. They say the Holocaust benefited Jews and world Jewry, but targeted “Hoaxers. Germany.” They question why Americans fund Holocaust museums, restitution, memorial councils, and support for Israel and world Jewry, noting “there are basically zero” organizations to support “founding stock white European Americans.” They claim the founding documents—the Constitution and Declaration of Independence—were overwhelmingly signed by white Europeans, and debate whether Freemasonry’s founders were Kabbalist Jews; one speaker asserts they were not, while another contends Freemasonry was created in 1843 funded by the Rothschilds to subvert Freemasonry and rewrite the narrative around founding fathers like George Washington, Ben Franklin, James Madison, and Van Buren. The dialogue then shifts to B’nai B’rith, with one speaker alleging it infiltrated Freemasonry in 1843, started by German Jews in New York, and that B’nai B’rith now runs over 5,000 Masonic lodges, schools, and facilities used for human trafficking, with Charlotte, South Carolina as their headquarters. They claim Khobod Lubovich is a rival “massive movement,” possibly more powerful than the Vatican, and assert they run the Vatican. One participant identifies as anti-supremacist but discusses white ethno-nationalist aims, asking why a white country or white state would be unacceptable. They discuss post-World War II persecution of Germans and cite Theodore Kaufman’s book Germany Must Perish as an example of an intent to wipe out the race. They reference WWII casualty figures, stating “over 11,000,000” Germans were killed and “Goy” casualties were “over 80,000,000,” emphasizing that whites—Brits, French, Russians, and Slavs—were killed as well. The conversation alleges Jews use strategies to incite Whites to fight among themselves, referencing World War I’s “brother wars,” and claims LGBTQ influences and vaccines (COVID) are used to reduce white birth rates and fertility. They discuss white Christians as “the biggest servants and soldiers” of these forces, citing John Hagee as an example of Christian Zionism being problematic. Overall, the speakers present a conspiratorial view: Jews and Jewish-led movements infiltrate and control Western institutions, aiming to subjugate or eradicate white Europeans, while white factions are blamed for resisting or complying with these forces. They highlight perceived contradictions in anti-racist or anti-immigrant stances and reiterate a desire for white ethno-nationalist sovereignty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanted to ask I wanted to get clarity on something real quick because you were talking about it when I came into the space. And the the concept of this white supremacy thing because I'm half German, half Irish. And, you know, we've talked in in spaces together where, like, nobody believes, like, the hola hoax bullshit anymore. And it's like, the more that people read into it with, like, the the masturbation machines and the lampshades and the piles of shoes, it's clear. Like, if you get a give it an honest assessment, it's like Speaker 1: Drunken heads. Speaker 0: It's fucking lunacy, dude. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: But when you think about it, who who benefited most from the Holocaust? Obviously, Jews and world Jewry. But who was the target of the of Holocaust? Hoaxers. Germany. Speaker 1: Yeah. Germany. White Europeans. No. Germany. Germany. It was very specific to the German people, not white Europeans. So why have Americans Dutch. Speaker 0: Why have Americans been paying so much for Holocaust museums and restitution and memorial councils and support for Israel and for world Jewry. Why are there 700 NGOs for supporting Jews and giving money to Jews, and there are basically zero to support founding stock white European Americans. Like, literally zero Jews signed the Declaration of Independence or the constitution, and the constitution and declaration were both overwhelmingly Speaker 1: signed by white Europeans. If you want it if you want to extend it, right, like, say, like, the the founding fathers that were Freemasons that were Kabbalist kind of Jews, then that's not accurate. Right? Speaker 0: They weren't Kabbalists. Freemasonry and and They were. The They were. They absolutely were not. The Bonnibre Rifts They absolutely were. Which insisted The Freemasonry was created literally in 1843 funded by the Rothschilds for the purposes of subverting Freemasonry and rewriting the narrative around our Freemasonry founding fathers. Like George Washington, like Ben Franklin, like James Madison, like Van Buren. Yes. Absolutely correct. Speaker 1: Absolutely wrong. Absolutely wrong. If you're talking about the free Masonic founding fathers, by extension, they're Kabbalistic Jews anyway. Speaker 0: They're literally not. I mean They were they literally They advocated for the constitutional exclusion of them from our republic. Speaker 1: Dude, are you are you trying to tell me that Freemasons aren't Kabbalistic crypto Jews? Speaker 0: So I'm trying to tell you that Ben Franklin in 1787 Speaker 2: actually a hierarchy. So you do have, for instance, those those crypto Jews, John Kerry Cohen, for instance. He's a free Masonic, Jew as well. Kabbalistic believer and all that stuff. Trump likely is too. He's a convert. And then you've got, you know, Freemasons that are secondary because it's their pathway to be able to become official Shabbos scorer that get to enjoy the perks of all the Jewish crimes that they commit. But they have been infiltrated. B'nai Berth actually did infiltrate the Free Masonic Lodges back in 1843, and it was done by a bunch of German Jews in New York that actually started the first lodge, and then gradually infiltrated the other lodges that they didn't control at that time. And Binai Berth is actually one of the biggest global movements now, they've got over 5,000 of these Masonic houses and schools, etcetera, that they use for human trafficking. Speaker 1: Charlotte, South Carolina is their headquarters. Speaker 2: Yeah, so they're everywhere. You don't even know where all the homes are because they have so many of them. And they're like supposedly in rivalry with Khobod Lubovich. That's another massive movement with many different pieces of real estate. I mean, they, they can, they're probably more powerful than the Vatican combined. I believe they are actually, I guess, well, they run the Vatican. So he's, he's not wrong. Speaker 1: But look, dude, do you understand I'm an anti supremacist? Right? Speaker 2: So No. I I understand that. Speaker 1: You you you wanna tell me that, you know, you you the white the white race, why can't we have a a white a white country, a white state, whatever? No. Nobody's stopping you. Have your white fucking ethnoidentarian state. Nobody cares. Speaker 2: And with Alex's point, and you're right. When you say they were persecuting the Germans, which they did, even after World War two, they killed over 11,000,000. They want to wipe out the whole race. If you believe Theodore Kaufman's book, Germany must perish. Speaker 1: Yeah. They had they had Germany on the target list from the early medieval times. Hundreds of years before it happened. Speaker 2: Do you recall how many Goy were killed in World War two? It's like over 80,000,000 or so. Right? They're mostly whites. And they're, you know, either British or a killer or French. Obviously, a lot of Russians who were killed. It's mainly whites that were killed. Speaker 1: Slavs. Mainly Slavs. Yeah. Speaker 2: Slavs. Yeah. And Slavs, but then, you know, Brits, French, others, whites were killed too. So the point I think Alex is trying to make is that they want whites fighting amongst each other, having these brother wars just like with World War one to wipe each other out and also to restrict their birth rates by pushing things like LGBTQ hijacking the minds of the kids to go and do sex changes, they become, well, infertile, right? They're sterile after that. It's the same deal with the COVID vaccine, that's going to lead to more sterility and reduce birth rates. So they are looking to kill to slowly, gradually, incrementally reduce the population of whites. So, I Speaker 1: mean, are their biggest, who are their biggest servants and slaves? Speaker 2: So I don't disagree that Christian Zionism is absolutely a problem, but it's Whites. Speaker 1: Right? Who who are their biggest servants and fighters and soldiers? Who? Whites. White Christians. Right? Yes or no? It's a certain most Speaker 2: of them. Yeah. They're absolutely my look. They they've Speaker 1: Okay. John Hagee. They're absolutely Speaker 2: a problem. So I I'm not gonna deny that. Speaker 1: So so so you can't have you can't have it both ways now. Can you? Speaker 2: Hey. Look, I condemn them as well. Right? And they're they're literally they're part of the brother. The reason why Jews have been able to rule as a minority over majority because, well, since nineteen o nine, when they came up with the Schofield version of the Bible, they've subverted these Christians that otherwise, you know, reviewed the Bible differently. Speaker 1: Subverted whatever whatever the case may be, my brother. The facts are the facts. Speaker 2: And they've still Speaker 1: got fighting their wars. Who is carrying their water? Who is defending them? Who is subsidizing them? It ain't the brown man. It ain't the black man. It's the white man. It's the traitors. Whatever. So take care of your traitors, bro. You know? What do you want from me? Oh, no. No. No. We go. But we but we we're just we're just slaves. We're just fucking manipulated. Well, take care of your own, bro. Don't tell me, oh, you wanna do your thing and have your own fucking white utopia when you're the slaves, soldiers and slaves of jewelry. Speaker 2: Well, Albert, see, with what how the Jews have taken over with their institutions, their control of
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 9:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I present Racine, Wisconsin as the Root and focal point of a hidden global Agenda, tying Flynn, Raiklin, Tucker Carlson, and others to a long-running power play. I cite the Partnership for Peace, Les Aspin, and the DNI’s evolution, linking Gates, Rockefeller, and Paul Harris to a broad plan across philanthropy, intelligence, and international bodies like the UN. I claim the truth is being controlled and urge us to uncover these connections together.

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

This is one of many threads to come. Share The Truth. @GenFlynn asked the Question “WTH is Racine???,” and it is time for The People & @realDonaldTrump to answer, together with Jesus Christ & The Truth. It is The Word feared by the most powerful people in the world. Why? 1/ 🧵

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Racine means Root. It is the model & keyway of the entire Agenda. It is the reason why so many are panicking. @GenFlynn asks “WTH is Racine???” yet @IvanRaiklin claims he’s been “talking about it for six years.” Not a single tweet by Ivan ever exposed The Truth of Racine. Why? 2/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

@TuckerCarlson travels to Russia. @GenFlynn & @IvanRaiklin respond. “The greatest two living Americans besides Roger Stone are on here with me.” - Col. Rob Maness. Does @RogerJStoneJr know about NXIVM, Knights of Pythias & Racine, WI? @IvanRaiklin can’t answer & wants to dox? 3/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

What did Putin imply that Tucker was connected with? CIA? Does Tucker know the history of the CIA? Or about Paul Ryan’s district? Why did Tucker leave Fox for Twitter? X? Does @ElonMusk know about Racine? Does @FinkD? @BillGates? @JoeBiden? @BarackObama? Romney? They all know. 4/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

@realMikeLindell visited Racine this past weekend. @RepBryanSteil held a hearing about Racine & the rigged election involving Zuckerberg, CTCL, Obama Fdn, Knight Fdn and others that focused specifically on Racine. Did they tell the real story? Why not? 5/ https://wisconsinexaminer.com/brief/mypillow-ceo-lindell-headlining-vos-recall-event/

MyPillow CEO Lindell headlining Vos recall event • Wisconsin Examiner MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell will be in Wisconsin this weekend to promote the ongoing effort to recall Assembly Speaker Robin Vos. wisconsinexaminer.com

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Paul Ryan did not resign from public office at the peak of his career to “spend time with family.” This is part of a much deeply orchestrated plan, all focused on ensuring The People don’t real significance of Racine. Why did they choose Racine? 6/ https://cha.house.gov/press-releases?id=F44FC0CC-DD36-49B0-A871-DF884FEA914C

Chairman Steil Delivers Opening Remarks at Zuckerbucks Hearing U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration cha.house.gov

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

They cannot disprove The Truth shared about Racine for many years. They can only attempt to control the narrative and keep The People from realizing the true significance, and the real crimes involved over the past many years, decades and generations. It has all led to this. 7/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

This is just getting started…much more will be added. What you are all going to find out is going to change The World. Only together with Jesus Christ and The Truth is the Root exposed, the Agenda revealed and The Mark of the Beast denied. Six o’clock can be dangerous. 8/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

What if you witnessed extreme corruption that affects every human, tried to stop it & followed a series of events that led to a city in middle America & center of the world where elite networks converge in secret, closed & open to devise the model for an evil global Agenda? 9/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Going back to Tucker, Ivan Raiklin, Mike Flynn and Col. Rob Maness, they discuss a very important connection, but fail to elaborate on it, or make the connections to Racine. It is the Partnership for Peace program. 10/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership_for_Peace

Partnership for Peace - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

The Partnership for Peace initiative was designed by the US Secretary of Defense Les Aspin who did not want to exclude Russia from international security arrangements. What did Les Aspin know about Racine, Wisconsin? 11/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Aspin

Les aspin - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Les Aspin faced complex social issues, such as the roles of homosexuals in uniform, and of women in combat, as well as major decisions regarding the use of military force in Somalia, Bosnia, and Haiti. The same Haiti that SC Johnson, Rotary, Tim Ballard & OUR focused on. 12/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

In March 1995, he began work as chairman of the study group on the Roles and Capabilities of the Intelligence Community (Aspin–Brown Commission on Roles & Capabilities of the US Intelligence Community, was commissioned after the National Security Act of 1992 failed to pass.) 13/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

The Commission produced a report in 1996. Sen. Boren (D-OK) wrote in the foreword to Robert D. Steele's book On Intelligence: Spies & Secrecy in an Open World that these reforms hadn’t been implemented by any Directors of Central Intelligence who had an opportunity to do so. 14/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Take a moment to think about this, and look into who has been involved over the past decades. Again, why would @GenFlynn play dumb and ask “WTH is Racine???“ when @IvanRaiklin has been infiltrating Racine for many years. Why Racine, WI, Ivan? 15/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_Central_Intelligence

Director of Central Intelligence - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

The director of central intelligence was head of the CIA from 1946 to 2004, acting as principal intelligence advisor to the president & US National Security Council, coordinator of intelligence activities among & between intel agencies (Intelligence Community from 1981 on). 16/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

The office existed from Jan 1946 to Dec, 2004. After the Intelligence Reform & Terrorism Prevention Act it was replaced by the director of national intelligence (DNI) as head of the Intelligence Community and director of Central Intelligence Agency (D/CIA) as head of the CIA. 17/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

There are many significant names. One is Hoyt Vandenberg? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoyt_Vandenberg Why were more members of Majestic 12 from Wisconsin than any other state? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12 18/

Hoyt vandenberg - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Majestic 12 - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Upon the inauguration of President Joe Biden, the position was elevated to Cabinet-level. The DNI attends all Cabinet meetings and liaises with the Executive Office of the President of the United States and other Cabinet secretaries in the execution of their duties. 19/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Senators Dianne Feinstein, Jay Rockefeller and Bob Graham introduced S. 2645 on June 19, 2002, to create the position of Director of National Intelligence. Jay is the great-grandson of John D. Rockefeller. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Rockefeller 20/

Jay rockefeller - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Frederick Taylor Gates became the key advisor to Rockefeller after he married his replacement wife, Emma Cahoon, in Racine, Wisconsin. Together they devised plans and models that evolved leading to today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Taylor_Gates 21/

Frederick taylor gates - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

One of the key components of Frederick T. Gates & Rockefeller’s plans were to use philanthropy, health, science, education, foundations & institutions to reinvent image, gain access & acceptance, build networks, and serve as cover for the real Agenda behind the curtain. 22/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

In 1901, Gates designed Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University) & then Rockefeller Foundation, in 1913. Gates served as president of the General Education Board, which became the leading foundation in the field of education. 23/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Working at the intersection of philanthropy, imperialism, big business, religion, and science, the China Medical Board was his last major project. What happened over recent years and how is this all connected? We are just getting started. 24/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

At a time when secret societies were more scrutinized, the same strategies devised by Gates & Rockefeller were used by Paul Harris & Freemasons to form Rotary International. Paul Harris is from Racine, Wisconsin. Racine is the Root. Rotary is the keyway. 25/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Paul Harris of Racine, Wisconsin founded the club that became the “humanitarian organization“ Rotary International in 1905. What is “Team Humanity?” How do you “protect humanity?” By controlling humanity. We will get to that soon. 26/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Harris_(Rotary)

Paul harris (rotary) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Rotary & United Nations have a shared history of working toward peace & addressing humanitarian issues around the world. During World War II, Rotary informed and educated members about the formation of the UN & the importance of planning for peace. 27/ https://www.rotary.org/en/history-rotary-and-united-nations

Rotary and the United Nations rotary.org

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

“From Here On!” & The Rotarian articles helped members understand the UN before formally established & follow its work after its charter. Many countries were fighting the war when the term “United Nations” was first used officially in the 1942 “Declaration by United Nations.” 28/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Today, Rotary holds the highest consultative status offered to a nongovernmental organization by the UN’s Economic & Social Council, which oversees many specialized UN agencies, and furthers its relationship with several UN bodies, programs, commissions & agencies. 29/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

Rotary Day at the United Nations each year celebrates the organizations’ shared vision for peace and highlights the critical humanitarian activities that Rotary and the United Nations lead around the world. Remember Dianne Feinstein? 30/

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

1907: Early service project - The Rotary Club of Chicago discuss the need for public toilets & improving sanitation. 1908: Rotary's second city - San Francisco, California, USA, becomes the second city to have a Rotary club in November. https://sfrotary.org/stories/remembering-senator-dianne-feinstein 31/

Remembering Senator Dianne Feinstein It is with great sadness that we announce the passing of U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein. Senator Feinstein was a member of our Club from May 1, 1989 until her death on September 29, 2023. On July 1, 2023, our Club made Senator Feinstein an honorary member again; she had been an honorary member of our Club before women were allowed to join Rotary. Senator Feinstein was a native of San Francisco and served for nine years as a San Francisco County Supervisor starting in 1969. The assassination of Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk in 1978 forever changed her life. She went on to become San Francisco's Mayor and ultimately, California's first woman U.S. Senator. She dedicated the rest of her life to public service and to finding solutions to problems facing California and the rest of the nation. You can read more about Senator Feinstein's accomplishments in her biography.    sfrotary.org
Saved - January 16, 2026 at 9:30 PM

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

Shabot Shalom b$tchs. 👂🏻 https://t.co/jwr9Tismb3

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

So, can I put a check mark on the left side of my chart now? @Meowllian @TimmyGs_312 @ImZeroDayz @TruCheetos listen audio on last 2 @Meowllian you mentioned you wanted to hear Ryan and Jonathans conversation about memory lane? 🫴🏻 "Bitcoin. "Nobody can prove you have it" right Sam?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The group discusses various connections and claims related to the Iron Dome program and individuals involved. Key points mentioned: - Erica’s father is said to be the chairman of Raytheon and to do extensive work on the Iron Dome. - Sean Maguire is described as “one of the key people running cover up for the identity of the killer” and is accused of pushing support for a person named Robinson, as well as supporting Bill Ackman, who is said to have offered a bribe. - The conversation references Truth and Ian and includes an assertion about Desi clarifying these connections. - Jonathan is highlighted for his exceptional ability to recite information; there are anecdotes about long sessions with him and the intensity of his contributions. There is also discussion about the challenges editors face due to Jonathan’s frequent changes of online usernames after being deplatformed, making it hard to track his accounts. - Other names appear in the dialogue: Lunae, Falu, Desi, Ian, Sam Parker, and Bill Ackman. - There is a mention of the workload on editors who compile and clip Jonathan’s videos, expressed as sympathy for their task. - There is a casual aside about a “big boobs” vendor reference and a note that the Israeli girl was discussed in DMs, with a disclaimer that the speaker is not the person being referenced. - Regarding the Iron Dome, it is stated that there are three main companies involved in hosting, overseeing, maintaining, and keeping it operational; one of these companies is Rafael (the sentence is cut off, but Rafael is identified as one of the three). The dialogue emphasizes alleged ties between prominent figures and defense contractors, the role of individuals in disseminating or concealing information, and the logistical and social challenges of content creation and attribution within this online discourse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With Jonathan, and then I believe it's Lunae and Falu, and we'll go from there. Speaker 1: Yeah. I wanted to who who the fuck said that? Speaker 0: It was me. Speaker 2: Hi, miss. Hi, miss. Speaker 1: Hi. I I wanted to give Truth and Ian a shout out because to add to something that Desi said or clarify a little bit. Because I understand it, and Ian correct me if I'm wrong on this, but Erica's father is the chairman of Raytheon is and does extensive work on the on the Iron Dome. And Sean Maguire, who was one of the key people or has been one of the key people running cover up for the identity of the killer and really pushing the Speaker 2: Clipping in and out. Just give me a heads up. Speaker 1: To support this kid, you know, Robinson, and even supporting Bill Ackman who is the one who offered the bribe. Speaker 2: Hey, Justin. You gotta you're outside or somewhere away from your Wi Fi. You keep kinda clipping in and out. Just give me Yeah. Speaker 1: I was doing that on purpose, Ryan. My my bad, buddy. Is it is it okay now? Speaker 0: Yeah. You know how to put it on voice isolation. Right? You you you just have a loud ass background. I don't Speaker 2: know if it's It's not the the outside doesn't bother me. It's just the fact that he was his Wi Fi was cutting in and out. That's what was you're clipping there for a minute. I don't care about the crickets. Speaker 1: That's Don't ask me personal questions like that in public in Speaker 0: front Speaker 1: of Speaker 0: other people. My bad. Speaker 1: Come on now. But but yeah. Speaker 0: Can you explain to people very quickly, like, just a nutshell version why the Raytheon piece is so important? Maybe people don't know what that is. Like, if if if people I I feel Speaker 2: like Yeah. You guys don't know who Jonathan is, let me just give you a little credit, man. This guy, again, like Ian and Sam Parker, there are very few people who have this gift that Jonathan has, and he I think he might have it better than he's, like, on the level with Truth Teller. His ability to recite stuff I sat down with him for, what was it, like, five hours, Jonathan. This dude, like, at one point, was like, bro, I don't think I've talked in the last hour. And he's like, oh, shit. I'm so sorry, bro. I'm like, no, dude. You're fucking killing it, but I need a I need a drink of water or a smoke or something. Like and he's like, alright. My bad. My bad. I was like, no, dude. You're fucking on fire, bro. Like, don't stop, man. So he's been absolutely killing it. I just sent him all the Speaker 1: whole videos too. So bad for your editors, dude. I was like, they've got so much to clip here. I felt so bad for editors. But I appreciate I again, I appreciate you coming and and doing that. That was very kind. But Well, Speaker 2: the only thing my editors don't like, Jonathan, is the fact that your that your username is tie changed three times because you keep getting deplatformed. So they're like, bro, where is Jonathan's shit going? I'm like, I don't know, dude. Just fuck it. Speaker 0: Just He's changed it, like, a dozen since I Speaker 2: met hard, dude. It's so hard to keep up with my computer. Speaker 0: At least 20. Speaker 2: I gotta go through, like, my account because it it matters how many people you follow versus the amount of people that follow you. And I'm like, gosh. Damn it, Jonathan. You got, like, 20 accounts. You gotta go figure out what all your old accounts were. And you make a completely different name every time. I'm like, bro, just stick with the same one. So when I search for you, I can figure out, oh, yeah. He's got a new one. There it is. But, no, it's always something different. Oh, they find me that. Speaker 0: Now he went to a vendor with big boobs. Did you see the big boob one? That's funny. What happened to the big two, girl? Yeah. I don't Speaker 1: I did. That is good. The Israeli girl. I had had so many people in my DMs. I'm like, I promise I'm not the one. This is not this is not the slide into my DMs for you right now. But, Speaker 0: anyway But that's the Raytheon. That's yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. So the Iron Dome has basically three main companies that are involved with hosting it, overseeing it, maintenance, and making sure it's operational at all times. And those three companies are Rafael
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker advocates downsizing all assets and resources, especially for public figures who are fighting a public battle and have a social media presence. The key goal is to maintain anonymity by moving wealth into Bitcoin so others cannot know you have it. Keeping funds on centralized exchanges or in a nameable account makes them visible and traceable, which the speaker warns against. The recommended strategy is to transfer wealth into Bitcoin and ensure it remains untraceable by using cold storage in an air-gapped, multisignature wallet. The idea is that once funds are in Bitcoin, they effectively disappear from scrutiny and cannot be proven to belong to you if properly secured. To implement this, one should convert assets into Bitcoin and transfer them to a cold storage setup that uses air-gapped security and multisig authorization. The speaker emphasizes the risk of losing access by keeping assets in traditional, monitored locations; specifically, if you leave Bitcoin on a centralized exchange, it can be seen and tied to you. Finally, the speaker notes a harsh consequence: if you conduct this process and then lose the private keys, you lose all the Bitcoin. In other words, the method hinges on secure, private control of keys, and the trade-off is the possibility of total loss if the keys are misplaced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gotta get your fucking wealth out of the system. You need to be downsizing all of your assets, all of your resources, especially if you're gonna be a public figure and you're gonna be fighting this good fight. If you have any public presence on social media and you're not fucking anonymous, you need to be downsizing your assets. You need to be completely light on your feet, move as much of your wealth into Bitcoin, and then it's in Bitcoin. Right? So nobody knows you have it. Nobody can fucking prove that you got it. Once you get it into Bitcoin, it's gone. So it doesn't exist. They're knew you and take you from it unless you're stupid enough to leave it on a fucking centralized exchange in an area where they can obviously see that it's in your name and you have it. But after you get into a cold storage air gap multisig wallet, you know, just go on a boat ride and you fucking lose your private keys and it sucks. You lost all your Bitcoin. Oh, well. You know?
Saved - January 16, 2026 at 9:07 PM

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

🎶🎹WhoTF is Jim Marchant? WhoTF is Patrick Byrne? WTF is Rotary? WhoTF is Ivan Raiklin? Whotf is Jeremy?🎶🥁, WhoTF is also involved with "Election Integrity"? 🍊🍊🍊🍊🫴🏻

Saved - January 13, 2026 at 3:06 PM

@DebWernerAllen - Deb Werner-Allen

Vos' SC Gableman "investigated" 2020 election worked w/ convicted felon Bernegger, as did Jonathan & HOT Bernegger, of Hillshire Farm family served 70 mos in prison for bank & mail fraud, has paid little to none of $1.7 mil in restitution ordered by court per public source info https://t.co/tBf0BzoSvV

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 7:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting that the allegations against Jake Hoffman and Tyler Bowyer aren’t new: in 2022, $2.1M from SPH Medical LLC funded Kari Lake ads via Hoffman's firm 1Ten, with shell entities and donor masking. GOP watchdogs urged prosecution; AZ authorities did nothing. In 2024 they allegedly double down with Turning Point USA, still using shell funds and hidden payments. I demand a full investigation into Kris Mayes and regulators.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 EXPOSED: Jake Hoffman & Tyler Bowyer's Fraud Scheme Has Been RUNNING FOR YEARS – Reported in 2022 for $2M Kari Lake Kickbacks, But AZ AG Did NOTHING!💰 The "new" fraud allegations hitting Jake Hoffman and Tyler Bowyer? They've been old news – and AZ officials let it slide! Back in 2022: Hoffman's "Put Arizona First" PAC funneled a whopping $2.1 MILLION into Kari Lake's campaign ads... all from a bogus "SPH Medical LLC", which is a shell company tied to the sameJake Hoffman/ Tyler Bowyer UPS mailbox in Phoenix – no real entity exists!). Hired Hoffman's own firm (1Ten) for the work – classic illegal kickbacks & money laundering to hide donors. GOP watchdogs (like Public Integrity Alliance) raised MASSIVE red flags, filed complaints with AZ Secretary of State & AG – calling it donor masking via "corporate artifice." Forwarded for prosecution... and CRICKETS. No action. Why? Fast-forward to 2024: They're DOUBLING DOWN – same playbook with Turning Point USA. Shell companies, hidden funds, pocketing cash through fraud. This isn't coincidence – it's a protected racket! BIG QUESTIONS: How do Hoffman & Bowyer KEEP operating this clear money laundering & kickback scheme? Has AZ AG Kris Mayes been BRIBED, BLACKMAILED, or GETTING KICKBACKS herself to look the other way? We DEMAND a FULL INVESTIGATION – pressure the AG & regulators NOW! Watch these 3 eye-opening videos for the full picture on their long-running scam: The corruption runs DEEP – share if you're ready to expose it all! Who's protecting them? Time for accountability! RT & tag @RealCandaceO & @AZAGMayes – Investigate NOW! 🇺🇸

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨HOLY SHIT: Tyler Boyer Was Previously PARDONED By President TRUMP!😱 President Trump pardoned Tyler Boyer for crimes related to voter fraud and vulnerabilities in the 2020 election—part of a massive wave of clemency for patriots targeted by the deep state. Wow. But hold up... this guy's got *major* baggage. Allegedly, here's why so many suspect Tyler Boyer conspired to take out Charlie Kirk: - As TPUSA's shady COO and a long-time political operative (rumored "gay little Mormon"), he hand-picked *every* key staffer around Kirk, giving him total control. - @RealCandaceO straight-up called him out as one of Kirk's "handlers"—allegedly sabotaging alliances (like hers) to isolate Charlie and consolidate power. - Inconsistencies galore: TPUSA's and the FBI’s stories about the Utah event don't add up, and how was the UVU stop locked in only months prior when it normally takes 6 months to a year to plan these events. Almost as if to set the stage for the hit on Charlie ? - Motive? Kirk's death handed Bowyer the reins to a multimillion-dollar empire—cozy timing for a "best friend" who's now refuting "wicked" conspiracies left and right. Not to mention just before Charlie’s death he noticed TPUSA’s financial’s looked funny and that money seemed to be disappearing too quickly, so he ordered a DOGE Style audit of TPUSA’s Books. Tyler if involved in an embezzlement, fraud scheme and cooking the books would be freaking out because once that DOGE AUDIT happened and Charlie found out who was stealing from him it most certainly would mean Prison time for Boyer if involved. This blows my mind that Tyler Bowyer was actually Pardoned by Trump. Who made that deal? How much was Trump paid to pardon Boyer or what was Trump expecting in return for the pardon? We all know you don’t just get a Presidential PARDON -“No Strings Attached”. Drop your Thoughts, Questions, Commentd below and lets Discuss. 🔥

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 7:32 PM

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

@DBoomaSan previously ran similar ops with Mel & MG Show @inthmatrixxxx & @Shadygrooove to lie & obfuscate Racine. MG Show threatened to dox everyone asking about Racine. They worked with Flynn for years pretending to flip 2023. DBoomaSan worked with Gene Decode. It gets worse. https://t.co/zvMVKvTFH6

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 4:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Is this all organic? Everyone’s watching me yet no one talks about Racine. How do I get an admin delegate for my account? Why do they follow but never discuss Racine? Can I get a CFEI paycheck or $3,000 in my TruthArchive? Can I work for Jim Marchant? How do we get our oranges?

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

Is all this ORGANIC??? Seems everybody is watching you but nobody wants to talk about RACINE? How do I get an "ADMIN DELEGATE" for my account? Why do they follow but never speak about RACINE? Can I get a CFEI paycheck? Can I get a balance of $3,000 in my TRUTHARCHIVE? Can I work for Jim Marchant? #WTFisJeremy? #WTHisRacine? @TimmyGs_312 ? @DenyTheMark2020 ?@TruCheetos ? @ImZeroDayz ? HOW DO WE GET OUR ORANGES???

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 3:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I blocked and muted you from Barbie’s account for attempting to fake-doxx or real-doxx. With some research you’ll see I’m the admin delegate for her account, as I’ve been for @MazeLove14 and many others. You aren’t the first wannabe doxxer I’ve blocked, and you won’t be the last.

@ChooseGoodKarma - Shane 𝕏

Congratulation loser, like any other bad actor that attempts to fake-doxx or real-doxx, you are now blocked and muted from Barbie’s account. With a little research you should be able to confirm I am admin delegate for her account, as I have been for @MazeLove14, and many others. You aren’t the first wannabe doxxer I blocked and you won’t be the last.

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 3:01 PM

@down_zulu - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebfren❄️⛄️

@DecentBackup Honey Pots and Distractions Club For No Growth Rinos Are you still following the STARS? https://t.co/vz1D0bKapS

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 1:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Ivan Raiklin knows Jeremy Oliver from the Flynn PA extortion network; Jeremy allegedly created Mastriano. Gamble and Jeremy are close, both work for Flynn, and Ivan sits on America’s Future board with Gamble. They were at J6; Ivan and Jeremy in Friends of Stone, with Gamble/i70 and Ray Epps at the breach.

@down_zulu - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebfren❄️⛄️

So @IvanRaiklin knows Jeremy Oliver from the Flynn PA extortion network…as Jeremy was the one created Mastriano… Gamble and Jeremy are best buds and both work for Flynn…Ivan is on the board of America’s future with Gamble They were all at J6, Ivan and Jeremy were in the Friends of Stone chat, and Brian Gamble/i70 were with Ray Epps pushing over the gate at the initial breach point…

@down_zulu - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebfren❄️⛄️

@england_17 @LauraLoomer What did Kappy know? @GabeHoff @Cernovich @LauraLoomer @JackPosobiec @Nero @RogerJStoneJr Jeremy Oliver (Kappy’s last media manager and publicist) https://t.co/2vZ3YgkfMJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The dialogue centers on accusations and revelations about political operatives and influence campaigns. Key points include: - A list of individuals named as problematic figures: Jack Kosobiak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer. Gabe Hoffman is described as “running hops on people” and as “a bad guy,” with a claim that these people are “evil” and unregistered foreign agents that the speaker will be watching closely. - A claim of infiltration and surveillance: one speaker asserts that someone close to them was likely there to infiltrate, and that “these people” attempted to set up someone they know and love, with the speaker vowing to monitor everything they do. - Allegations of role in broader disruptive actions: one speaker says, “We conduct riots and color revolutions and, you know, steal elections, and we overthrow governments we don't like. And I was part of that.” - The origin of operational concepts: one speaker mentions IIA, describing it as social media psychological warfare that began in 2007. - A sense of punitive consequence and manipulation: another speaker states that “they’re all being punished because they thought that what those important people told them was gonna happen,” and recalls being present during a plan to trash the capital, noting a lack of preparedness and security knowledge. - Reactions to claims about being controlled: one speaker says it pisses them off that others claim they’re being handled, with another agreeing that such claims have been heard before. - A warning tone about danger and preparation: one speaker warns that it is “very dangerous” that people are out there giving others hope, describing “a storm coming like nothing you have ever seen,” and asserting that not a single person is prepared for it. - Personal and on-site context: there are mentions of returning to a site to get a burner phone and use ghost accounts, and of attempting to coordinate around Breva, indicating ongoing, weaponized online activity and counter-movement tactics. Overall, the speakers blend accusations of manipulation and clandestine influence with admissions of involvement in disruptive actions, interspersed with warnings of impending upheaval and calls for vigilance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All over the place, guys. All over the place. Jack Kosobiak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, Laura Loomer. Gabe Hoffman is running hops on people. He is a bad guy, dudes. I look like I've seen a ghost. Yeah, have. And someone that was very close. To me, I'm pretty sure they were just there to infiltrate me. These are really fucking bad people and I'm beyond pissed. I don't even know how to describe the feeling inside of me. It's bad. It's bad, guys. These people are bad. They tried to set they tried to set someone up that you know and love. They're fucking evil. These people are evil. These people are evil. They're unregistered foreign agents. We'll be watching. I will be watching everything that everything you do. I'm gonna be watching. Speaker 1: Hell, yeah. On my way back to the site to get my burner phone so I can use my ghost accounts to fuck Breva. Speaker 2: We conduct riots and color revolutions and, you know, steel elections, and we overthrow governments we don't like. And I was part of that. Speaker 3: IIA, which is social media psychological warfare. We began that really in 2007. Speaker 4: They're all being punished because they thought that what those important people told them was gonna happen. Speaker 3: What a fucking country. What a fucking What What a fucking fucking country. I country. Speaker 4: Was was there. They were all pumped that they were gonna fucking trash the capital. I was there. And I was like, no. This is not good. They Speaker 3: weren't very prepared. No. I mean, not that I Well come in to rush the building, but just having a little bit of security knowledge. I was they weren't very prepared, were they? Speaker 0: Pisses me off that people say is that I'm being handled. Speaker 1: Yeah. Right. I've heard that before. Speaker 3: I gotta tell you. It's very dangerous that people are out there giving people hope. There is a storm coming like nothing you have ever seen, and not a one of you is prepared for it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 delivers a rapid-fire set of bragging lines about wealth, fashion, and success: “Go see my eyes red on my demons,” “My postie racks up just to motivate my niggas,” “Rappers need a stylist bad, but I ain't use a stylist yet,” “I signed a million dollar contracts in my box to steal a text,” “Wake up, check my bank account, phone numbers in there, bitch. I'm blessed,” and references to private jets, being fresh off the press, sipping drinks with lines, a tinted eye, a moving piece, and owning a new bulletproof Cadillac. He notes money, private flights, and the ability to charge for Instagram content, while cutting off a girl who didn’t pick up. The tone centers on opulent lifestyle, independence, and status. Speaker 1 shifts to a hostile, accusatory monologue: “All over the place, guys. Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, Laura Loomer.” He claims Gabe Hoffman “is running humps on people” and calls him a “bad guy.” He says he looks like he’s seen a ghost and that someone close to him was there to infiltrate him, describing these people as “really fucking bad” and stating they are “evil,” including claims of them being “unregistered foreign agents.” He asserts he will be watching everything they do and declares ongoing surveillance and vigilance: “I will be watching. Everything you do, I’m gonna be watching.” Speaker 2 notes a logistical detail: “Hell yeah. On my way back to the site to get my burner phone so I can use my ghost accounts…” indicating plans to obtain a burner phone for anonymous or modified online activity. Speaker 3 adds a blunt, explicit line about using “ghost accounts” for actions, saying, “can use my ghost accounts to fuck,” reinforcing the theme of covert or deceptive online activity. Overall, the transcript juxtaposes an ostentatious wealth/aspirational rap persona (Speaker 0) with a conspiratorial, accusatory stance toward specific public figures (Speaker 1), and mentions of circumventing scrutiny or anonymity online (Speaker 2 and Speaker 3). The named individuals identified by Speaker 1 are Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go see my eyes red on my demons. Yeah. Off the love they do that for me. I ain't got put none on his head. No. Got the bitches out they body and the niggas in they chest. My postie racks up just to motivate my niggas. Ain't trying to flex. True. Don't go broke trying to try that because they're weak on private jetty. Rappers need a stylist bad, but I ain't use a stylist yet. I signed a million dollar contracts in my box to steal a text. Wake up, check my bank account, phone numbers in there, bitch. I'm blessed. I'm like, yes. What's the word smoking gumbo herb? I'm a thur right now. In the earth, I'm free as a bird, plus I'm fly right now. Drip, talk a slur, can't wrong. I just hit another city. No need to look around for them. I brought the vibes with me. Right here. Fresh off the press of cool. 700 all binges loose. Just sip and walk. I get the Sprite and post some lines in it. Can't see my eye tinted. Nope. Made her in my moving piece. Smoothest motion you'd have You can't say it. New Cadillac bulletproof. I'm 300 laws. It's necessary. Make a killing Instagram what I charge. How much you want? I got some racks and got the fuck out of dime. When I was gone, I pop my shit. The fuck will pay me the bomb. Show must go on. Cut that bitch off. She ain't pick up when I call. Speaker 1: All over the place, guys. All over the place. Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, Laura Loomer. Gabe Hoffman is running humps on people. He is a bad guy, dudes. I look like I've seen a ghost. Yeah, I have. And someone that was very close. To me, I'm pretty sure they were just there to infiltrate me. These are really fucking bad people, and I'm beyond pissed. I I don't even know how to describe the feeling inside of me. It's bad. It's bad, guys. These people are bad. They tried to set they tried to set someone up that you know and love. They're fucking evil. These people are evil. These people are evil. They're unregistered foreign agents. We'll be watching. I will be watching. Everything everything you do, I'm gonna be watching. Speaker 2: Hell yeah. On my way back to the site to get my burner phone so I Speaker 3: can use my ghost accounts to fuck
Saved - January 11, 2026 at 1:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Melissa Gilbert, wife of Timothy Busfield, deleted her Instagram on January 10, 2026, after uploading multiple pictures of random children. No matter what the global pedophile cabal members do, the internet is forever and they can’t hide anymore since mainstream media and Pedowood propaganda no longer fool the masses. We the people are the news now and won’t let Pizzagate/Pedogate be swept under the rug. The hunters shall become the hunted.

@NathanJugan17 - Nathan Jugan #UnitedWeStand

Breaking ‼️🚨. Melissa Gilbert (wife of Timothy Busfield) has taken down her Instagram account as of January 10, 2026. Melissa uploaded multiple pictures of RANDOM children to her Instagram account. No matter what the global pedophile cabal members do, the internet IS forever and they can’t hide anymore since the mainstream media and Pedowood propaganda no longer fools the masses as it used to. We the people are the news now who are not going to allow Pizzagate/Pedogate to get swept under the rug. The hunters shall become the hunted 🙏

@NathanJugan17 - Nathan Jugan #UnitedWeStand

Timothy “Tim” Busfield has been accused of kissing unsupervised child actors and touching children inappropriately-this IS Pizzagate. Over the years, there has even been photographic evidence showing Busfield being around children at television show wrap parties 🤮. Timothy Busfield and his wife Melissa Gilbert can even be seen flaunting one eye Illuminati & Eyes Wide Shut symbolism, in addition to partying with random underage children at the 2013 Junkanoo Festival in The Bahamas and then uploading pictures of the kids to her Instagram account. On the Instagram page of Melissa Gilbert (wife of Timothy Busfield), she can be seen calling one child “Beautiful” (source: https://www.instagram.com/p/ibrLI9PoCE/?igsh=Z205dTVzN3Y3aHFq) and another kid “Gorgeous” (source: https://www.instagram.com/p/ibrO4tvoCJ/?igsh=cGw0bW5sY2xldTF5). As one can see, the global elite pedophile network operating in high society is the furthest thing from a “conspiracy theory”

Instagram instagram.com
Instagram instagram.com

@MichaelSCollura - SANTINO

🚨BREAKING NOW: West Wing actor Timothy Busfield faces child sex abuse charges as police issue warrant for his arrest. According to a warrant for his arrest, a child accused Busfield of touching him 'in his private areas' while on the set of the TV show 'The Cleaning Lady',

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 2:54 AM

@ImZeroDayz - Clippy

Hi @iheartmindy and @GabeHoff What did y'all get up to in Racine and what happened to Jenny Moore? #WTHisRacine

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

@Emme0703 @EdMartinDOJ Oh wait is that Mo'ssad Mindy, who focuses on prolife movies, with Rudy? It's like they're all connected... Don't tell me Jeremy Oliver and Anna Kait (literal mossad asset) too Roger "dirty tricks" Stone? https://t.co/HRbCKk4kmV

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 12:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
People accuse me of chasing attention, Jeremy. They question 2017 RKSA storage containers, J6 with Sandmann and Mastriano, Trump spotlight, and Onslaught Media’s suspension plus a non-existent IRS EIN. They claim Mastriano gave 83K, a Aug 4, 2021 trip with my girlfriend, filming Proud Boys and calling them Patriots, Nevada disclosures, 2022 contributions, a weak YouTube channel, LegalZoom as agent, and that I’m a grifter.

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

You should not have brought yourself to my attention, Jeremy. You really want to be a target? It never ends well.

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

You bought Storage containers in 2017? Now what were they for?🤔 You bought them from RKSA Industrial Co. Hong Kong it looks like.

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

You were at #J6 Jeremy? With Nicholas Sandmann and Doug Mastriano?

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

Trump put a spotlight on you? Not looking good.

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

Well this one explains why your Onslaught Media Company, LLC. shows suspended on the CA Business site. Are you even registered with the IRS? Your EIN does not exist. 🤔 Doug Mastriano gave you 83K after your company was susp3nd3d? Couldn't handle finances? Too big to fail? 🤔

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

You hung out with Mastriano with your girl friend, Jeremy? August 4 2021 Did you hve a good time? Did Mastriano pay for the trip?.

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

December 2020. Jeremy you went to film the #ProudBoys and you called them Patriots?

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

Funny name for a You Tube Channel handle. Only 3 videos? LMAO. https://www.youtube.com/@OfishfearmeO/videos

Onslaught Media Group - NEWS OMG Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. youtube.com

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

Now why is LegalZoom, Com Inc. the registered agent for Onslaught Media Group, LLC? 🤔 Onslaught Media Group, LLC was established on March 21, 2016. It is suspended now. https://www.bizapedia.com/ca/onslaught-media-group-llc.html

Company Search Subscription Service Professional Company and Officer Search Subscription Service bizapedia.com

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

You did not tell me you were a grifter, Jeremy. 😂 https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=H6F9WQEA3CS8L&source=url

Donate to Onslaught Media Group LLC Help support Onslaught Media Group LLC by donating or sharing with your friends. paypal.com

@13thKai - 13thKai #𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙇𝙤𝙠𝙞 🇷🇺

@theaaliaas He should have left me alone.

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 11:12 PM

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

@WattersMarty @GenFlynn Maybe after he linked up with good buddy Jeremy Oliver and they had STS situated https://t.co/WvMICBdYPh

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 10:56 PM

@down_zulu - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebfren❄️⛄️

@jimstewartson Jeremy Oliver’s Gf confirmed Brian Gamble’s wife Alysia Gamble is/was a honeypot for Project Veritas. If he’s the CIO of OMG then it sounds like she could possibly still be employed as such. Jeremy oliver is an enforcer for the Flynn tards and Brian’s good friend https://t.co/Wwoujsgt5V

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss allegations about Brian Gamble and his wife in relation to Project Veritas. Speaker 0 says Reba claimed that Brian Gamble's wife worked with Project Veritas and that she was a honeypot with them, along with Brian Gamble. Speaker 1 confirms, stating, “Oh, yes, she does. 100%. She works with Project Veritas. She's a honeypot with them. Her and Brian Gamble.” He also mentions a social media reference: Vincent Kennedy posted a picture of a pineapple upside down getting eaten by a gorilla, and notes that Loco Lobo posted about it, adding, “the upside upside down pineapple signifies that somebody's a swinger.” He then says, “Brian Gamble's okay with his wife going out on dates with these guys to obtain information from Project Veritas. Is that kosher? Like, would you let your wife do that? And Brian Gamble, as we all know, wants to have parties and get with the babes, you know, the fucking Botox babes and their plastic faces. Fuck them.” Speaker 2 adds, “Well, the record show that Brian Gamble, who was the CIO of the America Project with Joe Flynn and Mike Flynn, his wife, is a honeypot for Project Veritas. Okay. Just let the record show.” Speaker 0 says, “I will.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Basically was like, we have to get on the phone with Reba. And basically was like trying to give us all this information. One of the things she said was that Brian Gamble's wife worked with Project Veritas. Did you ever do anything like that? Speaker 1: Oh, yes, she does. 100%. She works with Project Veritas. She's a honeypot with them. Her and Brian Gamble. It's so funny too, because I I don't know how you guys feel about, Vincent Kennedy, but he posted the picture of the pineapple upside down getting eaten by a gorilla. And my friend Loco Lobo, I love you, Loco. You are a great one. One of the best add ons out there. Cory t, I know you're listening to this. One of the best, best add ons out there ever with a small following. And this is not a promotional time for me, but I'm just saying, Loco Lobo posted that Vincent Kennedy today posted something about swingers. Okay? Because the upside upside down pineapple signifies that somebody's a swinger. Brian Gamble's okay with his wife going out on dates with these guys to obtain information from Project Veritas. Is that kosher? Like, would you let your wife do that? I don't care how trusting you are. And Brian Gamble, as we all know, wants to have parties and and get with the babes, you know, the fucking Botox babes and their plastic faces. Fuck them. Speaker 2: Well, let the record show that Brian Gamble, who was the CIO of the America Project with Joe Flynn and Mike Flynn, his wife, is a is a honeypot for Project Veritas. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 2: Okay. Just let the record show. Speaker 0: I I will
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 7:23 PM

@Warrllion - WarrLion

TECHNOCRACY INCORPORATED https://t.co/0s7n4fxHJI

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 3:17 PM

@ImZeroDayz - Clippy

Hey @DecentReports Is this why you got everyone to downplay @Meowllian research? I guess it would be embarrassing for everyone if they find out you're LDS. You all are disgusting for the way you treated her. They rape kids in Utah but they have you staring at Israel. https://t.co/wD1p8t1Dqx

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 2:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I review a thread arguing that powerful networks—Gannett, Knight Foundation, Aspen, SC Johnson—shape information, trust, and democracy from Racine to national policy. The posts trace ties among media, philanthropy, and government, claim planned, multi-generational influence, and warn that control of information equates to control of people.

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

If you control the information, you control the people. Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy Racine, WI Meeting - [SC] Johnson Foundation, Wingspread Robin Vos- Speaker

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robin Vos discusses the role and perception of political leadership, media, and public discourse in Wisconsin and the broader United States. He begins with a personal anecdote about two Wisconsin speakers (himself and Paul Ryan) and how being “speaker” is understood differently in different places. He then gives his background: born and raised in Racine County, political activity since age 10, college involvement, county board, business owner, and a 2004 legislative career. He notes his early positioning as one of the far-right voices in the Wisconsin House, and how he changed as the world changed, including adopting Twitter in 2008 when the mainstream media resisted real-time updates from non-traditional outlets. Vos states two reasons for his presence: to address mainstream media and to reflect on how media coverage shaped politics. He acknowledges that he supported Marco Rubio, then Ted Cruz, and finally Donald Trump, arguing that a fair and unbiased media should be a base standard, though he asserts that most Americans do not believe it to be true. He cites campaign coverage as an example, noting that a loud, quotable candidate received over $6 billion in free coverage, while others received a fraction. He introduces a video compilation about Wisconsin media coverage, including stories on the John Doe investigation into Governor Scott Walker’s recall campaign, national media attention, leaked documents, and coverage of Tom Steyer’s activities to mobilize young voters against Walker and in support of Tammy Baldwin. He contrasts Steyer’s portrayal with the lack of coverage given to the Koch brothers’ similar activities, arguing that media treats some actors as altruistic and others as cynical, depending on ideology. Vos criticizes the media for leaking information from the John Doe process and for pre-judging outcomes, which he says violated state law and undermined fair reporting. He argues that the Guardian’s publication of John Doe documents amplified a narrative before opportunity for response, and that mainstream outlets often mischaracterize or selectively present information, shaping public opinion. He reflects on how people now distrust traditional outlets and turn to social media and “citizen journalism,” sometimes through partisan lenses. He recounts a personal experience with Barb Shear and Charlie Sykes to illustrate how people can misinterpret in-room dynamics when they only hear secondhand narratives. He laments that reporting often neglects open, two-sided discussion, which he sees as essential for accountability and good policy. Vos advocates three concrete reforms for journalists and policymakers: champion free speech (including reporting on campuses where opposing voices are barred or protests hinder dialogue), encourage thoughtful conversations that occur before breaking news, and push for fair reporting that presents both sides and allows nuanced debate. He argues that good journalism should enhance public understanding, not fragment it, and he emphasizes that relationships and pre-meeting negotiations in legislatures lead to better policy than sensational front-page stories. Toward the end, Vos highlights Wisconsin’s historical role in progressivism and conservatism, urging reporters and reformers to focus on open debate, bipartisanship, and policies that unify rather than divide. He warns that failing to do so will deepen national polarization and benefit only those who profit from division. He closes by reiterating the importance of free speech, thoughtful dialogue, and fair reporting as foundational to a healthy democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, that's wonderful. Well, thank you for having me. So, I'll tell you, when I first became a speaker in 2014, I kind of thought it was a big deal, right? So, I was in Washington about a year later and Paul Ryan had just become Speaker of the House. So, we now have two speakers from Wisconsin. We're on the plane together coming back from Washington and as we're getting off the plane, somebody asked if they could have their picture taken with Paul Ryan and I said, I'd be happy to take the picture. The next person walked up, they did the same thing. I took a second picture. By the time the third person walked up, they said to me, it must be so cool to work for Paul Ryan. So, I have now realized that being speaker is something that in certain parts of the country are a big deal, like in Washington and in state capitals it is, but for the most part, people don't understand what we do. So, a little bit about who I am and why I'm here and then we can take questions afterward because I understand that this part is going to be recorded on your website and the conversation afterward can be a little bit more candid when we can talk about some of those topics. So, born and raised in Racine County. I got active in politics when I was 10. My sixth grade teacher actually is the one who recruited me to be involved in politics. She actually took me to events at a time when it was not odd for a female teacher to be picking up a boy student who was young and taking him to events. Active in college, got elected to the county board, bought a company, eventually became a legislator in 2004, and at the time, I was probably the farthest right member of the House of Office, because I had been involved for a long time, knew what my ideas were, and then as the world went on, you learn and you change and you adapt, and the world changed and adapt along with me. In 2007, the Democrats were advancing. In 2008, they took over our entire legislature and the governor. So, we went from being Republican controlled or divided government to all Democrat. I couldn't get my message out because, of course, the mainstream media at the time still dominated by kind of the traditional media, focused mostly on the people that they considered their likely allies, which were the Democrats, people where they had the same ideological view, the reporters had known these people for a while, so I became the first adopter in Wisconsin of something at the time that nobody knew called Twitter. I began to tweet out, during meetings and the legislative leadership at the time said, you may not do that. We cannot have people actually telling folks in real time what's going on that are not part of the traditional media. Of course, over time that has changed and now it's just a part of our daily lives and the reason that I am here is twofold. First of all, for the people who are here in the mainstream media, I wanna say thank you for electing president Trump. You are the reason that Donald Trump is in the White House. I am somebody who in the primary process actually supported Marco Rubio. I then supported Ted Cruz. I then finally supported Donald Trump. So he was not my first choice, but frankly, as a conservative, I am happy that he is there doing all of the things that I would want but we have to look at how it occurred, why it occurred, and should it have occurred because those are all I think decent points. So the very idea of having a fair and unbiased media is something that in my heart as a political activist, I think should be a base standard for every single person in the country to accept as fact. But I'm telling you that almost nobody in America believes that that's true. No matter how much people think to themselves that it is, they do not. We look at what happened over the course of the campaign. The loudest, easiest quotable person got over $6,000,000,000 worth of free coverage. The other dozen candidates who were articulate and thoughtful and also quotable got almost one sixth of that combined. That's not something that was decided by anybody other than folks who wanted ratings and wanted to be the most controversial so that they could get better ratings than somebody in their same competitive marketplace. So, this is not a new topic. In Wisconsin, we have similar problems where there is a clear bias in the media. So, I have my staff prepare a video that we'll just watch quickly and then we'll discuss it and talk about some of the topics for you. Speaker 1: Investigation surrounding governor Scott walker's campaign could be getting new life. Speaker 2: On again, off again John Doe investigation surrounding supporters of Governor Scott Walker's campaign may be in for another twist. New at six, WISN twelve News political reporter Kent Wayne Scott spoke with some former district attorneys who think another court decision could be just days away. Speaker 1: Plus, the John Doe investigation. Are his lawyers really trying to settle with prosecutors? Speaker 3: National media coverage of Wisconsin's John Doe investigation exploded today. That after prosecutors said governor Scott Walker was part of a criminal scheme. Speaker 4: Democratic leaders in Wisconsin want answers after leaked documents from the John Doe investigation into governor Scott Walker's recall campaign were actually published today. Speaker 5: A turn in a major court battle over money spent during recall elections in Wisconsin. A federal judge halted the John Doe investigation. Speaker 6: We spoke with the governor just a short time ago. This John Doe investigation has been a cloud hanging over the governor since before he was elected. Now that it's done, he says it's time to move on. But his critics say the governor still has some explaining to do. Speaker 1: I'm Tom Steyer. And like you, I'm a citizen who knows it's up to us to do something. Speaker 6: Currently known for his television ads calling for the impeachment of the president. But California hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer has another target, Republican house speaker Paul Ryan of Janesville. Steyer's group, NextGen America, is making what it calls an historic push to mobilize young voters in Wisconsin for the midterm election. NextGen is hiring dozens of organizers and is trying to reach students on at least 35 campuses across the state. One of those organizing events happened Friday at UW Madison. NextGen America is spending $2,500,000 in Wisconsin try to defeat Ryan and Republican Governor Scott Walker and to reelect Democrat Tammy Baldwin. Speaker 1: We've spent a lot of money in Wisconsin. We're gonna spend more. So he's saying, you people in Wisconsin, you think you're voting? You think you have a fair election? You know? And but what do you what do you actually have? You have millions of dollars of Coke money in there buying these ads for Walker with an attempt to deceive you so that Walker can fire union workers so the Coke industries has to pay less for their workers. Speaker 7: We still see this on CNN. You know, they still love to put, you know, Bill Nye up against some, climate denying scientist, often not even a science, and pretend that these are sort of equal positions and it's complete nonsense. And so when I got to The Times, I started arguing with my editors and saying we have got to stop doing it. We weren't very bad about it compared to everybody else, I think, but we've got to stop doing this. And got there was resistance at first and then Hurricane Sandy hit, and we were all so emotionally gobsmacked. I mean, the editors at the New York Times lost their houses in Hurricane Sandy, and I remember sitting in, the office with, Jill Abramson and a whole bunch of editors, and having her say, this was the editor in chief of the paper at the time, having her say, I'm just tired of this nonsense. You know, why are we listening to these people when it so obviously is happening? And, you know, we got to the point where in a science piece at least, I was under no obligation to sort of call it climate deniers to sort of counter the real science. Speaker 0: So that's the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics. Seems like something that everyone should agree with, but it's not what's happening today. So, in the examples that you just saw in Wisconsin, let me run through those quickly and explain why the media bias was so incredibly lopsided. The John Doe investigation. In Wisconsin, we have something called the John Doe law, so we don't create a star chamber. The idea is that if someone is brought under investigation that it is done in secret because for someone who is in the political world, having the fear, the very accusation tarnishes your reputation and actually many times means good people don't run for office. So, we have a John Doe process. Reporters and people who were in the John Doe process leaked information for political gain. That's the only reason it was done. Didn't help to convince the case. It's because they did not have convincing evidence but they were so certain they were right. They leaked the information breaking state law. Then, a national newspaper, international newspaper called The Guardian got documents from the John Doe investigation and released those on the internet. So, exactly what we had said could happen and the reason that we have the John Doe law proved itself correct with an accomplished media who rather than looking and saying, wow, these people are breaking the law. They convicted governor Walker in the court of public opinion without even giving the opportunity for him to respond because under the John Doe law, he could not respond where he would have been breaking the law. So, it's a clear example where the journalist decided that the story and the idea behind it were more important than following the law or listening to both sides to give an opportunity for a fair and balanced report. The twenty minutes that they gave to Tom Steyer in Wisconsin to talk about his efforts to overturn elections in Wisconsin were done in a way that made him appear to be altruistic. Altruistic. And I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that he probably is. But why in the world in the same story or at some point would they have not had the same conversation about the Koch brothers who were doing the exact same thing on the other side of the political spectrum? Because the media believes that one is altruistic and the other is cynicistic. We now look at AFP, an organization that we know is founded by the Koch Brothers that goes out and recruits people on college campuses that has an opportunity to actually involve young people in the process. Exactly what they're talking about there but I searched all through the archives and I could not find a single story in Wisconsin about AFP's efforts in the exact same mod or motive motive presentation that was done the one time Tom Steyer came to town and went to a college campus. Never happened. You know, when you think about the ethics of journalism, I have in my rotary club, that's $10, but, you know, whatever it is. In in my world, I want a fair and open and honest media because it keeps me as an elected official accountable. But let me tell you why people are cynical. Because it isn't a fair and open and honest medium any longer. It's why unfortunately, I think people have gone to this idea of citizen journalism, okay? And let me say why I say unfortunately. My friend Charlie is here. Okay? And he has been a huge disseminator of information. Okay? Most of the time, I have agreed with him. So, I think it's good information. But that's the partisan lens we see everything through. So, the woman I talked about earlier who got me involved in politics, her name is Barb Shear. She held the Bible at my swearing in when I became the speaker. She's a wonderful, hugely generous woman but we were having a discussion about a political topic at the time in the state. What it was doesn't really matter. Charlie and I were on different sides and because she listened to Charlie Sykes every day, when I called her back, I actually explained, well, this is what's really going on, Barb. Charlie just doesn't know everything that's happening because he's not in the room And Barb said to me, you know, Robin, I'm not so sure. I I think Charlie could be right. And I said, no, Barb, I'm there. I am in the room. I am negotiating with the governor. She said, well, well, that's not that what Charlie said. And that is the world and the influence that people have on the process. Now, in the end. Yeah. In the end, I know I was right. But it changed the entire view that I have of interactions that my constituents have with individuals who are elected because somebody that I deeply knew that was probably one of the closest people to me that should have trusted me inherently because of our relationship, has never really met Charlie, never really done anything more than listen to his radio program every day. It's the same thing for somebody who reads the newspaper, right? They read the newspaper every day. It must be right. Even if this person who I am standing next to, who is in the room, tells me differently. Which is why I think that the media has squandered away their opportunity to be that independent, fact checking organization that people should believe in and give their trust and confidence to like Barb, my sixth grade teacher did. So, now, you really think about where we are today. We all know the definition of news is changing. You know, I don't use fake news but I certainly think that there is something to be said for that very concept. The idea that one person's news is somebody else's opinion, that somebody else's opinion can actually be fact or not, that all of it is now called into question. In our political process, you are supposed to be influenced by your constituents. That is the number one thing that you want to listen to. Now, Facebook, to their credibility, has now created a little icon where you can know when somebody is commenting on one of your posts if they're a constituent or not. And thank goodness they did that because we don't appreciate that 100 activists in any state who do nothing more than sit in their basement watching one-sided television or one-sided radio have a huge impact on the process and that's bad for democracy because my colleagues have the same individuals posting on their comments and they believe that they represent the majority and let me tell you, the vast majority of time they do not. But they portray themselves as such. So, because the media has now become so unbelievable in many people's eyes, they turn to individuals on Facebook to better represent where the public is than mainstream newspapers, mainstream television, mainstream radio. You've done it to yourself. We know that today, good news really isn't news anymore. In the video, you saw that most of the time, 90% of the time in our legislature, the bills that we passed have more than Republican support. Even though we are in a dominating position in each of our chambers and with Governor Walker. 90%. One story, one time, talked about a national study that was done talking about something that I initiated where we do a memorandum of understanding which guarantees open debate, it guarantees rights to the minority, it was hailed as groundbreaking and the only newspaper that reported on it was actually the Capital Times, which is a far left newspaper and basically criticized the Democrats for agreeing to the deal. That's bad for all of us. You should want people to be open minded and to listen. We know now that in-depth reporting is no longer necessary. In that presentation at the end, you saw the UW Madison journalism expert. When I decided to form my communications team when I became speaker, the normal way that politicians decide who is gonna work with you in the media is they take one of the staffers who was a volunteer, who has developed a relationship with the media, and that person then becomes the press secretary. Do you have any idea how much background they have in media? Zero. Zero. So, what I did is I did something different. I went to the local news anchor in Madison and said, I would like you to come and be my communications person. She knew nothing. I shouldn't. I don't want to insult her. She did not have the political experience. She knew a lot about politics but she hadn't worked in politics. So, she became my communications director. The next person that I hired was an Emmy award winning journalist and she's my videographer and I hired a gentleman who actually did social media as a profession. None of them knew politics but they all knew what they were doing. That is incredibly rare in politics and unfortunately, it's incredibly rare in journalism that the people who are assigned to cover politics have a basic understanding of how the political system works because what happens in the media is the exact opposite of what happens or the the same but in the different prism of what happens in politics. They take somebody. You might wanted to do sports but that position's already filled. So, you're gonna do local government. Now, sometimes they do a great job but that's not their interest area. They take the easy route most often, which unfortunately is to find one side and if that works, stick with it. The journalism ethics. My three staffers went to a seminar on ethics and journalism and UW Madison, one of the best programs in the country, is now saying that they are no longer advising folks to hear from both sides. There are some that they view to be not credible and if the source or the idea, the idea is not credible, you don't have to cover it anymore. Now, I actually believe that climate change is happening. Why is it happening? I don't know. Is it man made? Is it, you know, change in the cycles? I don't know. I'm not a scientist but I certainly think that people who have a different opinion have the right to be represented in conversations about why is climate change happening. I think on every topic, the public wants to hear from both sides and they should discern the information. Now, I know people on each of the coast believe that those of us who live in the middle of the country aren't as smart. We don't have the world view. We don't have an understanding. In fact, there was a quote, that's been tweeted all over Wisconsin from a woman at NPR who was standing in Washington DC, and the quote was, Overheard in DC, quote, I could never live in a rural area, some random ass city like Wisconsin, unquote. Well, first of all, Wisconsin's out of city. Important to know. But this is the attitude that a lot of us feel that folks who are putting the news together, making decisions about what we see and hear, treat us like. So, you become naturally skeptical of people who look down in your way of life, who don't understand what life you are living, and the challenges that you face. Now, let's also say that there is no doubt in my mind, and partly it is the capitalist system where the traditional media is hemorrhaging dollars, to find a way to sensationalize everything. Is anybody here from Gannett? Okay. So, the Journal Sentinel is our local newspaper. It had been premier. I think it was a wonderful newspaper the vast majority of the time and you buying it didn't change that. But what it has changed is the fact that they are no longer focused on ensuring that both sides are heard. They are focused on getting something that can be on the front page that convinces people to click through it to generate profit. I understand that. So, just this last week, we had a story that clearly shows sensationalism versus what you want out of government, okay? I am in line to become president of the National Conference of State Legislators. First person from Wisconsin who will ever do that. I am chair of the National Speakers Conference and I am on the board vice president of the State Legislative Leaders foundation. All three of those bipartisan Democrats and Republicans working together to try to find public policy answers that all of us could buy into so it's not partisan in one state and you know, red here and blue there. The Journal Sentinel decided that they were going to report that Wisconsin lawmakers got a $164.00 in travel and perks from outside groups. Now, when you read that headline and you are Joe Smoke citizen, that sounds like, wow, these legislators are getting some kind of undeserved perk that is influencing what they are going to do. 21 paragraphs down in the story after they sensationalized it about how awful it was, they said almost half of the total payments for legislators came from three organizations, the non partisan three groups I talked about. Craig Hoffman, who helped draft a federal law a decade ago that restricted when outsiders could cover travel expenses for members of congress, said he was not concerned about travel paid for by non partisan organizations like the National Conference of State Legislatures. 21 paragraphs down. After the vast majority of people stopped reading the story and had already made the idea in their mind that there is wrong with things happening in Wisconsin. Who did that serve? What entity did it help? It only helps to push people into their partisan corners and not wanna have them get together to actually discuss good, positive, non partisan things that we need in America. So, is media bias real? Yes, it is real. Another example. Now, we know Dane County is where Madison, Wisconsin is. It is 70% democratic. So, it is a wonderful place for me to visit and I wouldn't wanna live there. When I walk down the street, it is very common for people to say negative things, right? They'll call me a Coke sucker. You know, they'll call me all kinds of different names even when I'm at the shopping mall. It is the world that we have now become. It is not necessarily fun. The state opinion page is a guy named Scott Milford and he put in that one of my colleagues, Senator Fitzgerald, who was on the Trump train, he was a Trump person from the beginning, but in his district was concerned about human trafficking and the fact that there were strip clubs in his district that actually were becoming hosts of human trafficking and here's the quote that the editor of the newspaper put in. Senator Scott Fitzgerald, a front seat passenger in the Trump train, wants to shut down strip clubs. Talk about ironic. What did that have to do with the fact that because Donald Trump was somebody he supported for president, he now can't be concerned about human trafficking? And these aren't a left wing blogger. These are mainstream thought leaders in our state taking positions that make those of us who are in public service ask ourselves, is there really a fair and unbiased media? You know, Frank Lunce's quote, actually is one that I often think of. It's not what you say, it's what they hear. And that is something that every politician has to always think about. It's not what you say, it's what they hear. Now, many of you have probably already heard of the book Bowling Alone. It is something that I read and I strongly believe is true. When I got elected, as I said, I was kind of far right of the spectrum but a woman who was incredibly intelligent sat me next to a guy named Mark Pokan, okay? Now, Mark Pokan is as liberal, he represents Downtown Madison. His district actually had more votes for Ralph Nader in 2004 than George Bush. So, far left. But we sat next to each other and we became friends. He is actually now a member of congress and he and I have become good friends. His dog's name is Che. My dog's name is Reagan. He's gay. I'm not. You know, so everything that you could think of is who the two of us are. But we still can be friends because we have a mutual respect for each other that was fostered before the media changed with the social media aspect. You know, he came to my wedding. I I can just tell you he is a good, decent, honorable person who's wrong in almost everything but none of the first part matters and I think that's the world that we are living in now where people put the second first. He is not a good, decent person and he's wrong on all the issues as opposed to giving people that basic understanding of assumption that they are doing it out of things they believe in, not out of hatred, not out of anything other than the fact that you just have a simple disagreement. So, in bowling alone, we know that people are self segregating. We know that folks don't necessarily live with, work with, talk to people who are on the other side of the aisle. We know that individuals in the media live in the same bubbles. Let's just accept it. Your friends, the people that you live next to in a big city. Chances are are incredibly liberal and that's not inherently wrong. There's nothing wrong with it but just like I seek out and I try very hard to listen to both sides because my job is to represent everyone. I think somehow the media has forgotten that your job is also to seek out both sides and listen to everyone and not pass judgment on whether or not someone is credible, like the professor did, whether or not somebody has the right to be heard as we go forward. So, I asked myself when I thought about this over the course of being asked, I don't want to just come here and be a critic. I do that all the time where almost everybody who comes to testify tells me what's wrong with the idea. Very rarely do they say, here's how you make it better. So, let me give you some ideas of what things I hope you might consider as you make your recommendations. Challenge individuals to be champions of free speech. I don't know why that should be such a hard concept. You know, Pulitzer actually said, our republic and its press will rise or fall together. An able, disinterested, public spirited press with trained intelligence to know right and courage to do it can preserve that public virtue without which popular government is a sham and a mockery. Totally true. So, why on college campuses are you not reporting on the fact that they're not allowing both sides of the argument to be heard? That they pick one side they agree with and they protest to not even allow them to speak the other side. Shouldn't that be something that we as Americans unanimously agree with? The idea that everyone has the right to be presented and then we have the right to dissect but not dissect it first because no one has the ability to actually articulate a side that we would agree with. Number one. Number two, we need to make sure that we do more to bring good public policy individuals together to talk about solutions. It very rarely happens. I think most people have this belief that inside the chamber of whatever legislature, the congress, you have these debates and these discussions and smart ideas come out. That's not what happens. It happens in the meetings beforehand and where relationships are built. The fact that even during all the protests and everything that happened in Wisconsin, Mark and I kind of acted as the intermediaries because we had a personal relationship to not let things get out of hand. It's why we passed this brand new first in the country agreement where the minority and the majority sat and figured out how are we gonna make our chamber better. Those are things we want but they're not things that are very sexy and they're certainly not things that interest groups on either side want either because they want us driven apart because it serves their own political interests. Journalists need to do a better job of fair reporting. So, number one, we need to champion free speech. Number two, you need to encourage individuals to actually have thoughtful conversations. And number three, we need to do more to have fair reporting. Now, I totally understand and support the idea that you want to know everything that's going on because the public has a right to know. I totally agree with that. But as every discussion happens, sometimes you have to allow individuals to have a conversation before they get to the public so that they can actually articulate why things are happening, why individuals can have an agreement, where we can find those points of interest as opposed to only having points of contention. In a heightened media world, people are trying to always break the story and I understand that but by breaking the story, in many ways nowadays, they have broken the system. Reporters in the capital before knew how the process worked and they allowed it to work and then they reported on it as it went. Now, as soon as two people walk into a room together, they are beginning to report on it, which means you instantly can't take the time to think and it has hurt our political process. So, as much as you are able, in fair reporting, allow people to find their positions before you instantly assume what they are or assuage some concern that you think is happening but have no idea if it's occurring. So, they're not difficult but they're meaningful and real ideas that I hope you would consider as we go forward. Wisconsin was the birthplace of progressivism. In 1911, we invented the income tax. We invented an awful lot of things that had made where society is today. In 2010, we kinda did the same thing on the conservative movement which swept across a lot of the country. Rolled back public sector union rights, balanced our budget, did a whole lot of other things. So, you can have a state that has a dichotomy of opinion but is respectful in the way that they do it. I hope that as you issue your report and you think about ways to make our society better, you focus on challenging those basic tenants of where we are because you're our hope. You're our future and I say that as an elected official. You can keep it going like it is and it will drive America further and further apart and that serves no one's interest other than people who profit from the system. So thank you very much.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that it is all election interference, claiming they love to talk about disinformation and democracy, and that it's all disinformation. They say those people are great at cheating on elections and great at misinformation, disinformation. They claim these people are weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI, our election systems, and attacking free speech, and they're going into the states.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's all election interference. They love to talk about disinformation and democracy. It's all disinformation. They're great at cheating on elections, and they're great at misinformation, disinformation. Similar, not the same thing, but both. Because they're the ones who are weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI, our election systems, and attacking free speech, and they're also going into the states.

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

If you control the information, you control the population: Yes. Gannett is a very important connection to Racine (Rotary, Election interference, Aspen Inst., Knight Foundation, Freemasons, Shriners etc) >Frank Gannett > Cornell University Alum > Trustee of Cornell University > Cornellian Council > Founder of Gannett Company > 1935 established the Frank E. Gannett Newspaper Foundation > controlling owner of Gannett Co., Inc. when he died. >Gannett Corporation > 92 daily newspapers including USA Today > John Jeffry Louis > Appointed to Gannett Board Served as a director of Legacy Gannett’s former parent from 2006 to 2019 Chairman of the Board of Legacy Gannett from June 2015 through November 2019 Co-Founder of Parson Capital Corporation Director of The Olayan Group 📌Director of S.C. Johnson and Son, Inc ___ Members of the Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy (chairs and commissioners include(d) executives from SC Johnson, Gannett, Aspen, PBS Frontlines, Facebook, Cornell, and so many more) here is an example from 2023 https://knightfoundation.org/knight-commission-on-trust-media-and-democracy/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker alleges that it is “all election interference” and that they are “great at cheating on elections, and they're great at misinformation, disinformation” (described as similar, but not the same). The speaker further claims that “they're weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI, our election systems, and attacking free speech, and they're also going into the states.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's all election interference. They love to talk about disinformation and democracy. It's all disinformation. They're great at cheating on elections, and they're great at misinformation, disinformation. Similar, not the same thing, but both. Because they're the ones who are weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI, our election systems, and attacking free speech, and they're also going into the states.
Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy In 2017, the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program, in partnership with the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, established the Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy. Currently, trust in the major institutions of American democracy has fallen to troubling lows amid a rapidly changing information ecosystem. Without trust, democracy cannot function. It… knightfoundation.org

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Aspen Institute Knight Commission – Crisis in Democracy: Renewing TRUST in America (😮‍💨) Streamed live on Feb 5, ✏️2019 {Define Doublespeak} Rebuild TRUST in de-MOCK-racy and Media? Ability to find the third way? They say there is a threat to democracy, but then cry for the Republic if we can keep it 😡 "We need a media that will inform our citizens to make choices, selections that will provide and ensure facts." If you control the information, you control the people. Mapping out the plan.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The event centers on the release and discussion of a comprehensive report from the Knight Commission on the Information, Media, and Democracy, produced with the Aspen Institute and the Knight Foundation. Speakers acknowledge the hard work of commissioners, staff, and partners, and emphasize that the report’s themes—transparency, innovation, engagement, and a commitment to rebuilding trust—cut across multiple programs within the institute and beyond. The overarching aim is to address a crisis of trust in democracy and in the media, a problem described as global and among the most important for the health of democracies. Jamie Woodson and Tony Marx, co-chairs, open by recognizing that polarization and partisanship are at historic highs and trust in core institutions is at an all-time low. They stress the necessity of cross-sector leadership and action to rebuild trust, noting that the group learned from a wide array of input from across the country and from experts who testified. They underscore that the commission’s work models the tough, constructive conversations needed to move forward and that the report’s unanimous conclusions offer guidance for rebuilding trust in democracy and in the media. They highlight the Commission’s diverse makeup and its approach of tackling difficult conversations to reach meaningful, forward-looking recommendations. Tony Marx then adds a reflective point about Ben Franklin’s republic—“a republic if you can keep it”—and frames the current moment as one where the country faces uncertainty about maintaining democracy. He argues that trusted media and trustworthy technology are essential and notes the need for transparency across media and technology, as well as a local, representative media that serves as a check on power. He emphasizes that the work hinges on the public’s ability to talk, learn, and engage across differences, and that the report constitutes the beginning of a long effort to strengthen democracy. He closes with a nod to a Ben Franklin portrait and a pledge to keep moving forward. Alberto Ibargüen (Knight Foundation) speaks to the Commission’s formation, the collaboration with Aspen, and the renewal of a civic project built around shared democratic values. He notes the importance of representatives from Miami, Eduardo Padrón, among the commissioners and recognizes the leadership of Aspen and Knight’s teams, including Christine Gloria. He situates the Commission’s work within a broader historical arc about how the Internet and technology transformed information, comparing the current moment to Gutenberg’s revolution and the subsequent challenges of distinguishing truth from fiction. He observes that the report builds a foundation for civil discourse and neighbor-to-neighbor conversations across different perspectives. Charlie Firestone and other panelists present the structure and core themes of the report. The report divides into three integrated areas—media, technology, and citizenship—each with its own leadership, and all anchored in shared values: responsibility, free expression, transparency, literacy, innovation, and diversity. They acknowledge that while consensus was reached on many points, some specifics (like platform regulation) were not fully agreed upon, reflecting the complexity of addressing today’s realities. The report is designed as a compass for policymakers, industry, and citizens to navigate the trust crisis, rather than a prescriptive map of all possible reforms. A central, recurring theme is radical transparency. The media subcommittee, chaired by Rainey Aronson and Mizel Stewart, explains that transparency should be practical and cultural: journalists must reveal sources, label opinions clearly, and open up decision-making processes and raw materials (rushes, notebooks) to the public. The goal is to build trust by peeling back the curtain and showing work, while recognizing that traditional journalist-source protections remain necessary but should adapt to new expectations of openness. The media recommendations stress addressing perceptions of bias and the need to restore credibility in journalism. Meredith S. and Charlie Sykes acknowledge the genuine bias that exists, the threat of demonization of the press, and the importance of introspection within newsrooms. They argue that trust is the number-one asset, and transparency about methods, sourcing, funding, and editorial processes can improve credibility. A robust local press is identified as essential for trust in communities, with particular focus on news deserts and the need for a hybrid funding model that includes philanthropy to support new local outlets and diverse newsroom representation reflecting the communities served. Innovation in how journalism engages with audiences is highlighted. The report urges news organizations to reclaim audience relationships, invest in transparent practices about how stories are produced, updated, and corrected, and to develop new ways of involving audiences to co-create and verify information. This includes discussing the role of platforms in guiding discovery and the possibility of restoring accountability by owning more of the audience relationship and data. Technology and governance discussions center on information fiduciaries and radical transparency applied to platforms. Claire Wardle, Jo Anne Lipman, and Nahla O’Connor outline the need for corporate social responsibility from platforms, transparency about data usage, provenance of content, funding for political advertising, and algorithmic transparency. They advocate for a “glass box” approach to algorithms so users understand how personalization works and can act to counter filter bubbles. They also discuss data portability as a mechanism to empower individuals and to foster competition and consumer choice. The panel acknowledges the complexity of balancing innovation with responsibility and privacy, and calls for experiments and evaluation backed by platform data to measure progress. Citizenship recommendations center on reviving civic education and digital literacy, expanding access to substantive constitutional knowledge, and renewing civic spaces for face-to-face dialogue. Jeff Rosen emphasizes standards, substantive curricula, and funding for civics education, calling for philanthropists to support the development and distribution of high-quality, bipartisan civics content—such as online curricula that teach the First Amendment through interactive materials and cross-partisan exchanges. Charlie Sykes advocates for a national service concept as a way to restore shared purpose and civic responsibility, while stressing that digital literacy alone cannot replace substantive constitutional knowledge. The group urges lifelong learning about government and democracy, with curricula designed for diverse audiences beyond just students. The session closes with affirmations that the report’s recommendations are starting points for ongoing dialogue and action. The organizers encourage engagement via social media and reiterate the belief that America’s citizens are capable of rebuilding trust by moving beyond fear and anger, changing tools and approaches, and investing in education, transparency, and civic life. A questions-and-answer segment touches on scenarios for disasters, polarization, and the need to involve a broader set of voices beyond national media platforms, underscoring the ongoing, iterative nature of this work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Institutional contribution made by Alberto E. Barguen, the contributions made by the commissioners. And I wanna give special thanks to the amazing and and dedicated staff of the Communications and Society program who worked extraordinarily hard to put this together. I I am only gonna take another few seconds because we're all so excited to hear, from the commissioners and discuss these recommendations. The one thing that I that struck me though, looking as I as when I first saw them and as they were being developed over a few, weeks, or or maybe months getting to this point, is how some of these recommendations and themes of transparency and innovation, and engagement, and commitment run through so many other programs of the institute as well. Even, for example, the commitment one with a suggestion of a commitment to a year of voluntary national civilian service, which is something that the commission championed in a project here called the Franklin Project, which has gone on to great successes, the Servicier Alliance. But the fact is that it's gonna take a lot of work from a lot of institutions as well as as government government and the private sector and the nonprofit sector to move along these critical issues, which are probably among, if not the most important issues facing democracy, not just in this country around the world. And I'm very pleased that there are so many other parts of the institute who have overlapping interests with these goals and recommendations. So I wanna thank again all of you for being here. Special thanks to all of the people who did the amazing work that led to where we are and let the program begin. Thank you. Speaker 1: Good morning. Speaker 2: Good morning. Good morning. Good morning. Speaker 1: I'm Jamie Woodson, and I've had the privilege to co chair with my colleague Tony, this incredible group of leaders over the last twelve plus months. I want to thank first our partners with the Aspen Institute, Charlie Firestone and his team, the Knight Foundation, Alberto, Jennifer, and the teams, you all have brought together a pretty incredible group of people, and we deeply appreciate the opportunity that you have given us. It has been professionally meaningful, but it's also been personally meaningful as citizens. You asked us to dig into one of the greatest issues of our time and the crisis in our American democracy, and that's the crisis of trust. We all know and recognize that polarization and partisanship is at an all time high and trust in our bedrock institutions of our republic are at an all time low. And so for us, this has been an important and meaningful endeavor. We recognize as members of the commission just how important it is to have cross sector, cross political leadership, and action to help solve and rebuild this critical thing we call trust. I would also like to thank my colleagues on our colleagues on the commission for their incredible work, the time that they have taken. We've gone across the nation together. We have learned together. We have received so much input and thoughtfulness from folks all across the country as teammates in this effort, and we've challenged each other. From the beginning, we challenged each other to be learners. We challenged each other to be problem solvers and solutions oriented, and we challenged each other to be bold thinkers. And I think that you have accomplished the task that we've all asked and held each other accountable for. We're a diverse group of leaders. We are from all parts of the country. We have a great diversity and political perspective. We have different technical expertises, different occupations. And so I'm very proud that this group has modeled what we have called for so clearly in this report, and that is to dig through the tough conversations to get to meaningful recommendations that can move us and our nation forward. And so I want to thank my colleagues for that. And also recognize that in great candor, that process has not been easy. We, on many occasions, through our conversations and exchanges with each other, have felt the rawness that we see and we experience every day in our country. And we recognize that, but we stayed focused and we stayed focused and have the result, which is a unanimous report from this commission, and one that we believe will provide guidance and support as we together rebuild trust in democracy and in the media. And so we're very proud of that. Last, I would just thank the countless experts who have testified before us across the country, who has submitted their recommendations, have helped us learn deeply together. I'd also like to thank the thousands of Americans through a variety of venues who have shared their feelings, who have shared their recommendations, who have helped contribute to a better, more thoughtful report from all of us. Last but not least, I wanna thank my co chair, Tony Marks. Obviously, keen intellect. He also has a tremendous passion for our American democracy. And what I've come to really appreciate about Tony is his ability to find the third way and to find a way forward even when it seems like things might get bogged down. And that's not easy work, and it is greatly appreciated by your co chair. So with that, my colleague, Tony. Speaker 2: Thank you, Jamie. I just want to correct one false impression. I have no technical expertise of any kind. I also want to start by thanking our colleagues, the Aspen Institute, Dan, Charlie, the whole team. We've even added a junior member during Speaker 3: this process, Speaker 2: so we were productive in that regard. Thank you. And also, of course, the Knight Foundation, Alberto, Jennifer, the whole team there. The Aspen Institute and the Knight Foundation are pillars of our civil society. And this is just one more brick in reinforcing that wall, and it's an honor to be a part of it. And it was a particular honor to work with my fellow commissioners. As Jamie's already said, we came to see that we were in our deliberations modeling for ourselves, at least, the kind of hard productive conversations that democracy needs. And it I I will just say I learned a huge amount, and I'm in your debt. So thank you all. And, of course, Jamie, my co chair, who personifies the wisdom and graciousness of her state, of the South, of The United States. A real treat for me to get to know you and just the beginning of what I know will be a great friendship. Okay. Off the script. The famously, when Ben Franklin left the Continental Congress one day, people came up to him and asked what kind of government the founding fathers would provide. Jeff was gonna tell us whether this story is true or not, but the, Ben Franklin's response was a republic if you can keep it. I never thought I never thought in my lifetime or thinking about my children's lifetimes that I would be uncertain about our ability to keep it. But I am, and America is uncertain at this juncture. That line that always seemed like a bit of a throwaway or even a joke isn't. It's the most serious question of our day. Can we keep it? We know that in order to keep it, media and trust are essential, and they are both, as Jamie has eloquently said, deeply under threat. We need a media that will inform our citizens to make choices and selections, that will provide and ensure facts. Facts. Yes, Washington. There is such a thing as facts. Because without facts, we cannot check the power of those who lead us or want to lead us. We need the media's processes to be transparent. We need a media that represents us. And we need a local media. All of that is uncertain at this juncture. We have this amazing technology, which is not serving us well. We need a technology that doesn't reinforce our echo chambers, that doesn't distract us from the hard work of the mind and of democracy. We needed to be dependable, and we need to reaffirm that what you do with this platform and this technology belongs to you, not to the platforms. And that if you choose to take your wisdom, your friend friendships, your networks elsewhere, that should be absolutely your right. And trust. It all comes down to trust. We cannot trust each other if we do not know each other, if we aren't capable of talking with each other, of sitting with each other, of learning together. It's the work that happens in the library every day. It's the work that so many of us do, but we've lost that capacity as a nation, and we must find it. That's what brought this group together. It's what inspired Aspen and Knight and all of us who are part of this process. I want to be able to say to my children that we will leave them with the strongest democracy that we can. We have work to do. This report is just the beginning of that work. And when I get back to my office tomorrow, some of you know Ben Franklin portrait sits on the mantelpiece watching me with appropriate suspicion. I want to go back and say to Ben, we tried. We're moving. We heard you. We will fight to keep this democracy. Thank you all for being here. Speaker 4: I don't think Ben is suspicious of you, I think he's just skeptical. I'm Alberto Ibarguen, I'm president of, Knight Foundation. We support programs that inform and engage communities, so needless to say you will hear echo from me of what Jamie and Tony have just said. We gathered with Aspen, 25 smart Americans who had some things in common, many things not in common, from all over. What they critically had in common is that they believed in representative democracy and that representative democracy requires reliable information and they believed that neighbors who have differences need to sit down and talk about it. I know that may be shocking to some people in this room, but it's what happens in America and for a year and a half that's what we did. Thanks to Jamie Woodson and to Tony Marx, we were inspired and instructed. We were inspired by their vision, we were instructed by their iron will to come to consensus and keep us there until we did. Thank you for all of that. Thanks to the 23 other commissioners who tackled these incredibly important issues and I will take a moment of personal privilege to point out one of those commissioners from Miami, Eduardo Padron, who just this week, trying to upstage the Knight Commission, announced his retirement after many decades as president of Miami Dade College, having done an absolutely amazing job of community building in Miami. Thank you Eduardo for your service. Service. Thanks to, Elliot Gerson, of course, and the Aspen Institute for all of their tremendous support. This is the second time we've done this with, Aspen. The first time, was about 10 ago. And that, that, that effort too, as was this one led, by Charlie Firestone, whom I first met forty four years ago, when as a legal aid lawyer who was challenging a bunch of television stations and realized I knew how to fill out the forms, I didn't really know anything about communications law, called up the United Church of Christ and there on the other end of the line was Charlie Firestone who walked me through what turned out to be a successful process, even though I wasn't quite sure in the middle of it how we get to the end, just like on this one. Charlie, was the leader and calm presence throughout, and thanks to Christine Gloria, his wonderful, right hand and leader in her own right. And finally, to a lot of my colleagues at Knight, but in particular Jennifer Preston, who's our Vice President for Journalism Andrew Sherry, our Vice President for Communications, and Sam Gill, Vice President for Learning and Impact and Communities. The Commission's work, as you've heard, I think comes at a very critical time. Internet has obviously transformed what we know, what we think we know, what we think of as facts, and therefore how we think about the world. Fortunately, we're at the beginning of that technological revolution, so this is a great time to question, to examine the effect of technology. We really are, to borrow from Professor Elizabeth Eisenstein, we really are at a Gutenberg moment, and it's not just a throwaway phrase, it's as real as Ben Franklin's phrase that Tony quoted before Gutenberg's mechanization of the printing press, there was order. The monks would illuminate a manuscript or two a year, the cardinal would give it his imprimatur, it's always his, would give it his imprimatur and there was, you knew truth, there was no doubting it and after Gutenberg, any Tom, Dick or Martin Luther could mimeograph whatever you wanted and for a hundred years people were trying to figure out how do you determine truth from fiction and how do you deal with the incredible increase in the volume of information that was suddenly coming your way. I don't think without it, as Professor Eisenstein argues, you could have had the Reformation or the Renaissance and I think that's the spirit in which we gathered to look at what this technology is going to do, is going to do, is doing and is going to do. The work of the commission really reminds us that there's a lot that we can preserve, that bias is not unavoidable, that this is mostly true in local journalism where the distance between reader and journalist is the shortest, and you'll hear a lot about that as these proceedings go on, you read the report. Keep in mind that just as in society, we did reach consensus on a number of things, on a number of civic goals and proposals. We agreed in principle on others, the importance of free flow of information, the importance of free speech in a society, and we didn't find agreement on some specifics, like for example, the regulation of internet or of platforms. That, say otherwise, would be to pretend that we were not dealing with the realities of this moment in time. But that gives us, I think, what this report is and the way to really look at this report as Congress and the rest of society consider these issues, it gives us a base with a foundation, it's a foundation of fact and inquiry that gives us a model for how to go about this, of neighbors talking to each other with different perspectives in good faith. So I thank you all again for coming this morning. As Cornell West once said, I'm not an optimist, I'm a prisoner of hope. And no matter what the evidence is, I still expect that we're going to go forward. So Tony, we intend to keep that republic and I want you now to hear from Charlie Firestone who will walk you through the report. Thank you very much. Speaker 5: Thank you and you can see what great leadership we have had and support and partnership, and we really appreciate the partnership of the Knight Foundation, Jennifer Preston, who's shepherded this, not just in supporting it, but in leadership and insight. So we are very grateful to you. This is an auspicious day. It's not only the release of our report, but it's the Lunar New Year, and it's the State of the Union. So I don't know what the State of the Union is, but the State of our democracy is in crisis. And we're going to hear this. We've already heard it with our co chairs and we're going to hear as we have our panels on the individual recommendations. The charge to the commission was to look at why there's been a decline in trust in democratic institutions and in the press specifically. Over the last forty years, this has been a trend that's been going on for several decades. And what do we do about it? We did list a number of causes. We didn't give weights to them, but we looked at the poor institutional performance by government, the global shocks, particularly in technology, the polarization that Jamie mentioned initially, the increasing economic inequality and decreasing mobility as reasons for, general distrust in, our democratic institutions and in the press specifically, the proliferation of new sources, now everybody is a new source, the disintermediation of new sources to their audiences, the confusion between fact and fact and opinion, which leads to perceptions of bias, the spread of disinformation, which is a very serious and important phenomenon we've just come across, the political criticism of the media, and the decline of local news, which is sad and happening even to the point of news deserts in many communities. But we did try to stick to how to specifically to trust and not try to solve all of democracy's problems or all of media's problems. So, you know, we did have to limit ourselves somewhat, and we tried to do that. So the structure of the report, which you now have in your hands, and hopefully for those who are watching on the webcast will be able to find online. And if you want to discuss it, our Twitter handle is NITECOM, with two M's. So we hope you will engage in a dialogue on online. But the structure was the first half of the report is building context. First, what is, you know, the importance of trust to a democracy and a healthy distrust? So, yes, we we need trust, but we also need to be skeptical and have that picture of of Benjamin Franklin overlooking us in our minds, if not in our offices. We looked at the history of media and the new media environment and found a perfect storm of economic decline in some of the new in the news business, the technological advances, and the polarization in our society. This commission was assiduously nonpartisan or bipartisan, but we came together. And so there is, but there is a discussion of government and media and the presidency in the media. And just, briefly, we do find that a robust press is an essential ingredient to a thriving democracy. So while we have three different sections, one on media, one on technology, one on citizenship, and all of them involve leadership. We think of these as integrated. So when we call for transparency, we call for transparency across all media, including technology. And we highlight at actually Alberto's urging, we didn't want to create a map, wanted to create a compass. And so we really focused on a lot of the values that we need going forward, including responsibility, free expression, transparency, literacy, innovation, and diversity. And you'll see those throughout the recommendations, how we try to enforce those values in the specific recommendations that we make going forward. I mentioned responsibility and I reminded that the Hutchins Commission itself, which the Hutchins Commission was a report on the press in the late nineteen forties, looked at the press, the future of the press, they said they found it wanting. And they said, if you are not responsible, you're gonna get regulated. Newt Minow, when he gave a speech to the National Association of Broadcasters and called broadcasting the vast wasteland, he urged them to be responsible or face more regulation. There is a lot of talk in this, while we do recommend some regulation, such as, and we will hear about it, sponsorship identification and information fiduciaries. We do urge all leaders, all people to act responsibly. We're very proud this was a report that the rest of the country could model in terms of bringing together diverse viewpoints, diverse people to come to consensus moving forward. So finally, just want to thank people who have done a lot of thank yous. We thank the Knight Foundation, the commissioners, and particularly the co chairs. I would like to mention in addition to Christine, and she's the one who brought an extra member of the commission. She had a pregnancy during this. But Tricia Kelly, Sarah Eppohimer, and Richard Adler, who is the primary writer, Nancy Watsman, Ethan Zuckerman, all deserve special mention. They've really brought this to fruition. We're running a little behind. Thank you. Let's bring up the first panel, will talk about the media recommendations. I guess mention while you're coming up, Charlie Sykes, Tom Rosenstiel here, Rainey Aronson, Mizelle Stewart, and Meredith Hartley. Thank you. Let's start and maybe Rainey and Meisel, who co chaired a subcommittee, could start off with describing what the actual recommendations are in this. Speaker 6: So why don't we start with our favorite one, is transparency? I think we started our conversations really talking more practically about transparency. How could journalists in a nuts and bolts way actually apply some techniques that we use at Frontline and across the industry? How can we make our work more transparent? And that actually grew into a much deeper and more profound conversation about transparency across the board. So as you'll look at the report, you'll really start to see that we're recommending radical transparency. We use that word very carefully and intentionally, and Myzel can talk a lot about that as well. But one of the things that we note is that especially when it comes to journalism and trust, one way to build trust is to be intentional in how you share your sources, how you label what you do, from opinion to factual to non opinion to news. Some of the recommendations we give are very practical. Some of them are actually cultural. So this is about how do you take the idea of transparency into the newsroom and into what you do as a journalist. So in other words, journalistic culture has often been to protect your sources which you also you need to do but also to protect information and our recommendation is to actually share more than you've been accustomed to sharing before and to open up your notebooks, and in my case, up your rushes, which are the film rushes that we use in order to make big documentary films, to actually have a welcome conversation with people who come to you to say this is how we make decisions, this is how we tell stories the way that we do and in addition to that, this is the additional information in journalism that can be at your fingertips. Speaker 7: Another way to really look at this, the transparency recommendation is that journalists often assume that people know and understand what we do, how we do it and why we do it. And we believe that that is a false assumption and that contributes to this almost pervasive sense of distrust. On my way to Washington yesterday was reading a story that outlined actually an international example in Germany where there's a scandal going on right now with Der Spiegel, one of the most respected publications in Germany, scandal of fabrication, where a trusted award winning reporter was found to be essentially making up stories out of whole cloth. And journalism as an institution is often quite self policing. And it turned out that a partner, a writing partner of this journalist was the one to begin to expose him because he was concerned that a story that was provably false that contained included his name needed to needed to be investigated. And but there's that understanding really is not common or I think really understood among the general public. And so that, in the transparency recommendations, we believe, presents an opportunity for news organizations to explain in real time here's how we do things, here's why we do things the way that we do them, and in so doing, peeling back the curtain as a way to increase trust. Speaker 5: Charlie Sykes, maybe you could describe how the transparency recommendations might address perceptions of bias. Speaker 8: Well, thank you. Yeah. Yeah. I think this is one of the most effective things that that the media can do, but I also think that and I think that the commission was very open to a discussion that, yes, there have been bad faith attacks on the media, but the perception of bias is not always wrong. There is real bias in the news media and it has had catastrophic effects on credibility. Look, your number one asset in the media is in fact trust and credibility and that is easily squandered through a lack of accuracy, through mistakes, and through a perception that you are not fair. And one of the things that we've seen, I think, over the last couple of years has been the delegitimization of many of the gatekeepers. And this has been a long time coming. I mean, go back into the 1950s and 60s and there were long there were many, many critiques that the news media was biased, that it had double standards, that it was there was a great deal of groupthink. Conservative media, and I was part of this, grew and flourished specifically because there was an audience that felt they were not being served or respected. It did not just come out of nowhere. Now what's happened I think is the equivalent of suffering from stomach flu and treating it by drinking battery acid because what's been happening is that rather than simply dealing with a question of bias and unfairness or the lack of ideological diversity in media has been this you know, wholesale attack on the press as an enemy of the people. And the consequences of this are so grave. And and I've told the story before, and again, being a conservative, pushing back on the audience when there was false news, fake news, propaganda because I thought it was important not to traffic in misinformation. In 2015 and 2016, what I started noticing happening was that I was not any longer able to cite anyone in the media, any independent credible source to push back on the fake news. And this came as a shock and it probably shouldn't have been because this has been going on for so long. So I do think that, and this is a very difficult period given the you know, how fraught our politics is, but I do think that the media needs to have deeper and more serious introspection about its biases both conscious and unconscious because we are now seeing the consequence that we are seeing some of the best journalism of my lifetime right now, some of the most extraordinary journalism being practiced and yet 40% of America is not paying any attention and will not believe it. And so the restoration of credibility is going to be incredibly difficult and I do think that the recommendations on transparency are extremely important. Speaker 5: So Meredith, I want to get into some of the other recommendations because we don't have a lot of time and, one area was innovation and some of the, ideas for how technology and media can work to innovate in finding sources and that kind of thing or determining sources and all. Maybe you could spell out a little bit of that. Speaker 9: Absolutely. So one of the things we discussed around this actually dovetails nicely with transparency. If you think about all of the explosion of different kinds of platforms, formats that a story can take, devices, and kind of this thing that we all feel that there's just a lot and we're surrounded by never ending feeds. And some of that is journalism and news and some of it's entertainment and just kind of an avalanche of this never endingness. We've gone, you know, we're in that environment now where there used to be a little bit more of a sense of completion. You'd reach the end of a program or a publication. Those days are gone in many ways. So, you know, the innovation practices around transparency in particular haven't evolved, as everything else around, journalists and journalism has changed. So if you think about, for example, the ways that we, the news media, have seeded to the platforms some very important things. We've seeded the a lot of the conversation that we have with our audiences, right? I know it's CNN. I made a decision several years ago to not have comments on the site anymore because frankly they were a disaster. It was just was counter to a civil conversation. There was no filtering software that could raise the bar of the conversation. And in the meantime, we were seeing the rise of, Twitter, Facebook and the like and we said, we'll have the conversation there. That's actually where our audiences are. But in some ways we seeded that conversation with our audiences to someone else's house who didn't necessarily have the same values that we have. Right? So that was a lack of innovation. That was an opportunity to do something. I think that tide is turning now. I think we're starting to take some of that back. I know we're doing some of that at CNN and I see a lot of our, I'd call it competitive set, but these days it just feels like sisters and brothers and other independent news organizations. We're all in this together right now. Trying to think about ways to kind of own that relationship with our audiences a lot more. So the call for innovation to me is very close to the call for how we show our work. To Myzel's point, I think there are, journalists who kind of take for granted that some of those things are understood. A lot of it's very nuanced and it's really important to show who we are, how we are, how we do what we do, when we do get things wrong, because we do, we're humans, how transparent are we in that? And that is no small challenge. It's not the same as you know, printing a correction file on page two of the paper anymore. It's a lot more nuanced to how we clarify and update and when we change something and why and being very transparent with audiences about that. Those are opportunities for innovation and it is time for news organizations to take that back and not see the audience relationship, not see the business model, and not see the data that we should own to help grow independent journalism to other companies who don't share our values. Speaker 5: I'm hoping you can just lay out the other two recommendations, one on diversity and one on the what we do about local journalism and the news deserts that are going on. Then I'd like Tom Rosenstiel to react. The first four on my right are commissioners and we've invited Tom, who's head of the American Press Institute, to react to these recommendations. Speaker 7: Let me start with local because that's the world that I have inhabited for the last thirty plus years of my journalism career. And, you know, there's no secret to anybody in this room that local media, particularly that which has traditionally been practiced by newspapers, is in the midst of a massive transition and transformation between legacy models and a digital future. But I want to frame the conversation in this way because we really approached it with this in mind, is that, you know, quality journalism has always been subsidized in some manner. Even if you go back to the colonial days, the first pamphleteers, if you will, were printers. And their primary business was honestly manning a printing press, as Ben Franklin in that Tony cited in his introduction. And so, you know, what will subsidize the collection, the reporting, the dissemination of quality journalism. And through eras, whether it was printing in the colonial times, readers in the era of the penny press, you know, advertising as classifieds became dominant in supporting the business model of newspapers, you know, there's going to have to be some subsidy. And what we believe is that and reinforcing our recommendations is that the future support for independent local journalism is going to be comprised of a hybrid model. It's going to involve some infusion of dollars, and this is really the you know, one of the moonshot recommendations, is do we create a climate of philanthropy to subsidize the creation of new local journalism outlets across this country. One of the case studies is a creation known as the American Journalism Project, which the Knight Foundation has graciously, agreed to, provide, which Knight Foundation is working to figure out how best to support, and other philanthropists. But, you know, how do you create new news organizations and communities that can provide that independent check on power, that independent look and examination of local institutions, because, you know, in newspapers occupying that role historically they had such economic power that they were able maintain that independence and that level of independence is what becomes threatened as the business model collapses. Speaker 6: And crucial to that was when we were looking at this, we didn't land on local right away. We actually took a really hard look at the research to say, where is the trust breaking down? So as we started to look at local communities and in particular news deserts, when there isn't a local entity that's holding people accountable and corruption doesn't just show its face, there was no relationship that people had to their local media that was actually meaningful to them. Instead what they were seeing is national media which is important but was always a second media to a lot of the people that were either interviewed or spoke to us personally or in fact, multiple research projects now show that local media has really been a builder of trust. So that was a big orientation for us is to actually identify that as one of the breaking points for us in America. Speaker 7: And then finally, that, you know, a journalism that is trusted in America is a journalism that looks like America. And survey after survey shows that news organizations across this country are falling short in meeting the goal of having newsrooms truly reflect in terms of race, in terms of gender, in terms of political perspective and LGBTQ status, that, you know, fairness in media is truly when people across this country see themselves reflected in the coverage. And when newsrooms are not at parity with the communities that they serve, there we see misinterpretation, we see gaps in coverage, and we've seen that repeatedly as, you know, whether it's issues such as the police treatment of African Americans, we see the debate on gay marriage and gays in the military, we see in transgender issues and so forth, when those perspectives are not represented in newsrooms there's something missing in the coverage. And so we strongly recommend that news organizations participate in the various surveys that are done to measure progress against that goal and that news organizations rededicate themselves to building newsroom teams that reflect the communities they should. Speaker 9: And it's a business imperative, right? Speaker 5: And political perspectives and geographic diversity being an important element as well. Tom, what are your reactions to where we are? Speaker 10: Well I'll go fast. I I hear the Oscar band, in the background. First I'd like to say, note before you get to the recommendations of the report, the point on values in journalism. It says, rededicate to the ideals of the profession. I know that the commission heard various advice about this including the idea that this was a special moment and that maybe journalism should become more of an activist force for resistance. That's a trap. When, a despot says, the press are the enemy of the people, and the opposition, he or she is inviting the press into a briar patch and the more they act like that, the more they will confirm exactly what the despot wants. And there was some discussion about that and I think it's significant that the commission said rededicate to, it didn't take that bait. That does not mean don't change, however. Journalism is not stenography you know, and it needs to avoid the problem of false balance. And that's what leads I think to the recommendations. How to change? How to change and yet sustain the fundamentals. One of the things that the press and that people always do when they are trying to change in any industry and struggle with it is they confuse their good intentions with good practice. That's where we fall down on bias. Journalists think they set out to be fair, they think they're being fair and they don't see their own biases. And I agree with you Charlie that newsrooms have gotten more liberal over my lifetime in the profession and that's a blinder. So, a point about radical transparency as I go fast. It's the first recommendation. It's not simply a series of techniques. Radical transparency is a mindset, it's a spirit, it's a way you go about thinking about your relationship with the audience and the purpose of radical transparency in journalism or anything else is to reveal your motivations and your intentions to the audience, to create a new relationship. So as you read these, don't think, oh, you do this, you do this. It's not a checklist. It's a culture change. When you I have one caution about the recommendation about expanding the financial base of journalism and that it has to happen. You know, there is no one silver bullet here. As you move into, depending more on non profit money, it's important to know one bit of history and that is that commercial journalism was insulated from pressure because it had so many advertisers that no one advertiser could push it around. As you move into philanthropic funding and you have significant funders, particularly in areas of coverage, there's a whole new set of ethics that we need to create and understand more deeply about how do you create insulation. Beware, I will say after many years in journalism, of funders with good intentions. The last two points real fast, Charlie, are when you think about technology and how you embrace it, yeah. I mean in many ways journalism's crisis now is not a technology crisis, it's a geographic crisis. It's about local, the decline of local interest in local news as people have more access to national news. It's about the nationalization of politics and our conversation that has encouraged polarization. So when we say that we need more local journalism, it's not just about what we need to have people looking at the city council. That's how we change our democracy. That's how we restore the public or recover it. And so the technology that we embrace has got to understand what are the higher purposes of journalism, what is the technology for, not just what can you do with it. And that leads to the last point. I cannot endorse Charlie's point more. Diversity means making your newsrooms not look like America, but making your newsrooms think like America. It means intellectual diversity, changing the way people think. If I hire people who, you know, have, with a range of colors but I all want them to be just like me and they can't talk and we can't argue and there's no real diversity, there's no argument, there's no clash of ideas, I haven't accomplished anything and I've not created diversity and I've not in the end created the localism. One point that all of these things connect on is as we change the business model and particularly connect more towards having readers pay for the journalism, there is a mission alignment between the content creators, between the news people and the business people in newsrooms because suddenly I've got to create things of such value that you will pay for it as opposed to you're a big mass audience and I want to leverage you to advertisers who are my real customers. There is a tension there that gradually gets erased as we get more committed to creating value that readers will pay for. Speaker 5: Thank you to this panel and we're gonna live change. As we have the next group come up, I should mention that, the transparency meme goes through the, the whole report. It applies also to technology companies, and it applies to government. We can't just be transparent in the media. If we want to have the media report accurately, the government itself needs to be open and transparent as well. I mean, not in every not in every aspect, but in some and that's in the report. Okay. Let's Nulla O'Connor was our chairman of our little subgroup on the technology, and I think you'll start us off with and to her right is Joanne Lipman, and Claire Wardle will comment. Claire's, runs the First Draft News, which looks at disinformation, and and technology. Speaker 11: Thank you so much, Charlie. Thank you all for being here today. I did wonder what I'd done to annoy Charlie that he put me in charge of this section since it was one of the harder fought and a difficult one. But I'd like to point you first to the findings because not only do they reflect some wonderful writing and thinking by members of the commission and Ethan Zuckerman as we mentioned, Liz Woolery on my team at the Center for Democracy and Technology, but they reflect the real tension that we have here at a time when technology has so disrupted journalism and frankly perhaps our democracy. We are still trying to hold dear to what some of us thought the internet was all about at its dawn, the values of openness and equalization of opportunity and freedom of expression that was the vision, at least, of civil society at the dawn of the commercial Internet. We are now more than a quarter century beyond that initial commercial Internet, and it's well worth having the conversation about the fundamental legal and technological underpinnings that are the infrastructure of our vast communication system in this country and in many parts of the world. And we had some of that conversation. I think we really actually began some of that conversation about where we go in The United States and where we go elsewhere in the world in reigning in the power of larger platforms and still promoting the voice of the individual. I think our work also echoes what you've heard in the other sections, which is the values of transparency, but also the really hard look we took at bias, both implicit and unintended or very, very openly stated the bias and the privilege of the creators of some of these technologies and why the very fundamental architectures of the algorithms that fuel the way we learn and understand our democracy and our world reflect an existing power hierarchy, an existing structure, and how we can be mindful of breaking those barriers down, of staying true to our commitment to equality, to freedom of expression, to voice, but also to accuracy and truth and facts. And what is and then I'll turn to our recommendations and I'm gonna talk to one and Johanna's gonna talk to the second. But the one I am so excited about is really the question we at my organization, the Center for Democracy and Technology and many of us on the commission have been asking, what is the corporate social responsibility of companies in the digital age? As we've asked our industrial companies to clean up rivers and to fix the pollution to the environment that they have caused, what is the civic duty of a platform, of a company, of a purveyor of information that may or may not be true? What is the duty of care that these companies have to the individuals that they putatively serve? And so we've we've put that in the terms that some of you are familiar with from Jack Balkan at Yale and Jonathan Zitrin at Harvard who is on the commission, the construct of the information fiduciary. But we there are lots of ways to talk about it whether it's data stewardship, information stewardship, editorial judgment. These are all ideas that we should be thinking about when a primary purpose of a construct is to provide information, information that is essential to one's citizenship and one's understanding of the democracy. So there are lots of iterations of data stewardship and information fiduciary. The one that you see in the report reflects the collection of individual data and the provision of information and news by an institution. I'm excited about that. You do see that moving into the dialogue here in Washington DC on Capitol Hill and I think I would just say watch this space for legislative, regulatory and other actions to rebalance the power between the self and the state, the self and the institution. Jo Anne, do want to talk about number six? Speaker 12: Sure, sure. I'm gonna talk for a couple of minutes here about transparency, radical transparency, which is what we talked about with journalism. We believe it applies equally to the technology industry. And this, I have to say, it was also, I think, among these recommendations we're talking about were also among the most radical of all of the recommendations that are coming out of the commission. It was, as you've heard, very difficult conversations were had between, on the one hand you've got journalists and on the other hand you've got Google and Facebook and technology firms that sometimes have competing interests, would sometimes be frenemies, in that the business model of the technology firms and the social media platforms is they want us to share information. That is the core of how they do business, how they sell advertising depends on all of us sharing information. What we also learned though is that it turns out that false information on social media spreads faster than true information. There is a study that we actually referenced in the report that analyzed more than a 100,000 news stories and rumors shared on Twitter. The most popular false stories reached 100 times as many people as the most popular true news stories. And we also learned in listening to various parties on the commission that the emotion that spreads fastest is actually anger, outrage. And so all of us as users are being sort of incentivized to share sort of poor quality information and yet that is good for the business model of the technology firms. And that's why I think it was so revolutionary and I give so much credit to our colleagues on the commission who come from those companies to come together and have a candid conversation about that and about what can we do about that. And so that's why the transparency recommendation, I think, is so vital. So you'll see there are three recommendations within that. One is tools to trace the origin of the news story. We know that bad actors have hijacked social media both before the election, but even now, just last week, Facebook and Twitter purged hundreds of false accounts spreading misinformation originating from Russia, Iran, and other bad actors. There are technological resources and human resources that we can put into addressing that and finding the source and rooting out the bad actors. There's another element to this that I that also is will help us going forward I think in terms of disclosing funding sources for all ads and this is an interesting way of looking at this. So the tech platforms now get the vast majority of all advertising which is one of the reasons why journalism is so stressed in terms of its own business model. And yet there's been a lot of opacity around who is paying for this advertising. So in the wake of the twenty sixteen election, there has been movement on the part of the technology firms, the social media firms and on the part of the federal government to say we really need to understand the source of the funding. But the commission goes further because our feeling is, and we have seen it in practice, that in trying in an automated way to get to political advertising, sometimes there are mistakes. Sometimes a New York Times story or a Politico story gets miss classified as advertising, political as having a political point of view. So our recommendation is that all ads have we can see the source of funding, there's transparency, the source of funding for all advertising online. And then finally, this transparency about algorithms which you'll see under this recommendation could have really far reaching impact and again, this is one of those moonshot recommendations, but if you think about the issue that we all have with these echo chambers and filter bubbles, the idea that the algorithms are the secret sauce of the technology firms and so they guard them very, very closely, but the algorithms are essentially acting as editors. They are choosing the information that we see in our news feeds and yet we have no sort of visibility into how or why that is being done. And so we are recommending that a glass box approach as we call it, which is so that we, the users, can understand in plain English what is personalized, why it's personalized, to what extent it's personalized, and also what we as users can do to control the customization. The hope there is that once we have a better understanding of the filters that are put around the information that we see, that we can do something actually as users to also sort of break out of our own filter bubbles. Speaker 5: And Nula, maybe the last Speaker 11: Recommendation seven really gets to drilling down on the idea that just as technology got us out of into this problem, it's gonna get us out of this problem by experimenting and thinking creatively about structures to enforce and reinforce and enhance the idea of more power and control in the rights of the human. I want to especially highlight the construct which I think Tony mentioned, the idea of data portability. And this draws again on the theme of information fiduciary and balancing the power between the individual and their own data. You should know I personally am a little bit of a skeptic about this call to regulate in the antitrust sense the size and scale of the platform. Small companies have a lot of data as well. And so the idea that an individual has the right to take their to port their data and to create a new persona at a new platform, whether social media or otherwise, is certainly being met with some resistance by by companies because data is oil, data is the lifeblood of the digital economy, whatever analogy you wanna create. But data is also a part of self and so this is I think an exciting thing. We're going to see more of in tech and non tech competitive spaces as well. So number seven really gets to the idea of thinking about the creative spaces and collaborative spaces these platforms are providing for discourse and dialogue and making sure we are understanding at the very least transparency around terms of use and policies about how the data is handled and collected and the impact that that's having on discourse online. Speaker 5: Great. Claire, you've been studying disinformation to a tremendous amount and you're really in touch with the whole community that's doing this, which is a great, academic and, active community. What's your reaction to these recommendations? Speaker 13: Thanks, Charlie, and thank you for inviting me to give comments. And also to manage to write a report by committee. I was involved by a very similar process with the EU Commission this time last year, and it nearly was the end of me. So I'm congratulations on getting through the process. So overall, I just wanna say how struck I was by the emphasis on responsibility throughout this re report. For me, whether you're a journalist, researcher, policymaker, just someone working at a technology company, I really do think we have to say, how will history judge us? And I think it's no small thing to say all of us have to be having that conversation at the moment. And how do we make sure that we're thinking about potential harms and unintended consequences now, not in ten years' time or thirty years' time when the historian writes that book? So we've had two and a half years of talking, convenings, let's just say it, tinkering around the edges. And I really do think that now is a time for experimentation and evaluation based on truly global conversations involving the smartest minds as well as the input and lived experiences of those people who use these platforms every single day. And I know that was a big part of this commission. And so while I completely understand that this report is written with The US in mind, some of you who are good at accents will know that I'm not from The US. And so the major challenge we have when thinking about technology companies is that they are global in scale and the decisions they make every day are global in outlook by necessity. So we have to recognize that when we're thinking about these types of interventions, how can technology companies think about these when they think about global scale? So in terms of the three sets of recommendations, just some reactions. Firstly, information fiduciaries. Not only is it the best word in the English language. Since I heard Jonathan Zitran and Jack Vulcan talk about this idea, I was convinced it was something that we need to explore further, so I'm really glad it's made its way into the report. But we do need to think more about the specific details of how this works. You know, for lawyers and accountants and doctors, for individuals, we understand that. How does it work in terms of a technology company? And how can we consider other mechanisms for strengthening privacy in terms of opt in consent for data sharing, more transparency about how personal data is being used to drive targeted ads and just clearer wording for terms of service agreements? We keep talking about it and they're still they just get longer and longer. So secondly, recommendations connected to transparency. I'm not going to lie. I'm a big fan of the actual use of radical transparency. I know it makes people nervous and I know it in particular makes the technology companies nervous. But it is a word that gets thrown around endlessly, and we do need to think about specific mechanisms by which transparency becomes the norm. So the first idea about investigating provenance, I couldn't agree more. Fact checking is wonderful, but I increasingly am talking about the need for source checking, the ability in real time to have tools that allows either journalists or my mum to work out the provenance of not just a news story but a meme, a video, an image. There are real challenges here around how information moves across these platforms. These tech companies think about themselves, not recognising the much broader ecosystem and how information travels. Secondly, yes, yes, yes to transparency for all online ads. We've worked now on six elections around the world. Disinformation agents, both foreign and domestic, understand, that it's not really about political advertising. It's advertising that's trying to shift different social views and take advantage of those social and cultural tensions and religious tensions that exist within a country. So we cannot there isn't a clear line. Platforms are going to push back because the scale is so hard, but we have to enforce that. And lastly, this suggestion about algorithmic transparency. Not surprised the technology companies were shaking in their boots when you said that. But the recent research from Pew that showed that most Americans don't understand that their Facebook news feed is algorithmically determined shows the more we can actually educate Americans about the power of algorithms, the more they're gonna say, well, hang on. How am I only seeing that friend and not this friend? How come I'm seeing this news report and not not that report? So the more we push, the more I think we're gonna get, momentum from the American public. And so finally, the recommendation is connected to innovation. We do need to make sure that these are driven by research, that we have clear definitions, we understand user needs and are properly evaluated. One of the recommendations was developing metrics for the health for a healthy online dialogue. Now that sounds great, and we all nod. But what does that actually mean? And how do we ensure that that isn't just written up on a whiteboard at a US university on the coast with really well meaning academics, but it's not actually driven by empiricism and what a healthy dialogue means. The other point about how do we discourage sharing of disinformation is so important. There's an academic called Nathan Matthias who's done incredible work on nudge technology. If you remind people in a forum not to share until you've checked, lo and behold, we do slow down and we do stop and check. So we need to supercharge those efforts, but most importantly, we need full buy in from the platforms so that they will share the data with us afterwards to tell us whether or not those experiments worked, even if it means people spent less time on their platform and it impacted the bottom line, which takes us back to responsibility. Where do we wanna be in thirty years time and what did we actually do? And so yes to data portability, the network effect something like Facebook has means that developers say, Why should I even try? Everybody's on Facebook. So again, there's going be pushback on that and the report does a good job of talking about privacy issues around moving somebody's data. But we have to think really innovatively about that. And the last idea was one that I was particularly excited about, which was the idea of a multi stakeholder forum, which I'm actually working on a project right now, not just for technology companies, but for the information commons as a whole. How can we bring together those smartest minds and the American people? So in conclusion, while I think the report's recommendations highlight the most persuasive ideas for tackling the issues we see today with media and democracy, there are a couple of suggestions I would have liked to have seen. One is we do need access to platform data for independent accredited researchers and journalists. It is a priority. People constantly ask me, what's the impact of these disinformation campaigns? We can't answer until we get that data, and we shouldn't be writing regulation until we have that data. So the platform companies, in their interest, they're going to have really poorly written regulation unless they can give us some of that data. And the second, we can't disproportionately focus on the big players. We have to understand this whole ecosystem, closed messaging apps, many other different types of players in this space that get ignored because we're so focused on Facebook, Google and Twitter. And so very finally, the time is for experimental experimentation and evaluation. And I'm just gonna say this as a British person. I was, of course, very taken by the reference in the reports, the creation of the BBC almost a century ago in 1922. And I know in this country, people would like to think that the BBC is a state sponsored broadcaster. But what I love is those Reethian principles of how do we inform, educate, and entertain? How do we build trustworthy digital technologies with that in mind? How can we think big with data portability and algorithmic transparency to really think about something for the public good? And so I would just push you when we think about these recommendations. They really are strong, But the time is now, and so we need to be even more ambitious. Speaker 5: Thank you, and thanks for this panel. So now so last but not very well very important is, the recommendations on citizenship. And in the end, you know, we can talk about the journalists, we can talk about the platforms, but in the end, it is we as citizens who need to take responsibility for the government that we vote and for the media that we see. So Charlie Sykes, was on the commission and spearheaded the citizenship, recommendations. And Jeff Rosen, head of the National Constitutional Center, will react. Thanks. Charlie? Speaker 8: One of the most important things I think about this commission report and was reflected by Tony's comments a little bit earlier is that I think the commission had a real sense of urgency about the particular moment and the the seriousness of the threat we face, that this is this is kind of a fire bell to say that we do have a crisis of democracy, and we think we've we've discussed this. And in a sense, I I think we kind of reverse engineered it as we go through all of the misinformation and the divisions in society. I favor all of the recommendations for dealing with the platforms, although I'm somewhat skeptical. Are we gonna be able to fix Facebook and Google? Are we gonna be able to change all of that? So one of the things we began to think about was we know that there is this massive misinformation out there, but how do we explain the fact that there are so many gullible Americans who believe it? How do we explain the breakdown of our democratic norms beyond simply the failures of the elites? And it's become almost fashionable now to to say that we are all victims of this, that this has been done to us. But I think that the what the commission has ultimately decided is that there is a crisis of citizenship. It's us. That nobody's gonna come in as a white horse and wave a wand and change this if the American people have forgotten or not learned what the values, the history, and the institutions of this country are about. One of the phrases we you've heard frequently has been the phrase moonshot. This is real moonshot here. And the analogy that we talked about on the commission was that moment in the late nineteen fifties when the Russians launched Sputnik and Americans began to realize, wow, maybe we are now paying the price for not teaching our children about mathematics and science. Well, what's happened in the last couple of years is in a sense a civic Sputnik moment where we are realizing, wow, we are really paying a rather dramatic price for not teaching history, not teaching the the institutions of the country. Civics education has been allowed to wither away. Now this is my term. It's not in the report, but I think I think there there are real consequences for dumbing down the American people when it comes to all of this. The assumption that we all relied upon, the people that Americans knew how our system of government worked, understood what the what the constitutional balances between the various elements of government were. But what if they don't? What if we've been drawing down this reservoir of democratic values and democratic knowledge? We just assume that it's there, and then we wake up and find out, well, these are much more fragile than we ever thought. So to the recommendations that we think that it's time for a rather dramatic revitalization of civics education in this country, not just as a mandate for k 12 education, but across the board that Americans need to relearn these constitutional values. They need to relearn their history. In part, to remember what it means to be a citizen. This concept of citizen which has many rights but also has responsibilities. And a citizen that is also linked to one another in ways that that sometimes I think we forget. We don't have a shared narrative in this country anymore. Increasingly, it's, you know, us versus them, red versus blue, and the citizenship is, I think, part of all of that. So number one is civics education, and one of the more radical proposals that that we made was that that every and we're we're not into mandates, we're more into suggestions, that that that every high school graduate before they vote for the first time should at least have the knowledge to pass The US citizenship test. To say, okay, here we have just a a model that we don't allow people to come in and become citizens and vote unless they have a certain body of knowledge. Well, why not have that for Americans as well? Paired with this, obviously, is a a recommitment to digital literacy, which we've been talking about, implicitly throughout the whole morning here, which is that at some point we need to focus on how do you educate the American people to handle this explosion of information? How do you somehow restore the immune system of the American mind to what we're seeing right now? Because I do think that that whether it is in whether it is ignorance, indifference, or gullibility, we do have a lot of Americans who, are not prepared to deal with the democratic dialogue and debates that we have right now. So if they have civic literacy, we need to have a dramatic commitment to digital literacy. We are not prescriptive in saying because nobody on the commission is naive about the difficulties of education reform, but this also does not require reinventing the wheel. I think you're gonna hear from Jeffrey, there are people who have devoted tremendous resources to coming up with curricula in for civic education, for digital literacy. The question is whether or not we as a country are committed to do it. And finally, we come up with a proposal which I think is ripe, which is to say at some point if we are going to revitalize citizens citizenship, we need to change the relationship of individuals to one another and to society through a system or a recommitment to voluntary, I'll that word, voluntary national service. And this is something that the Aspen Institute has dealt with in the past. I think this is a bipartisan potential moment for Americans to find some sense of shared purpose. It is that we narrative that we lack as a country, that we don't think of ourselves as Americans. Now there are a lot of obviously technical issues involved in in national service, voluntary national service, but there are models and we cite them in the report that can be scaled up. But also I think it's the conceptual approach to say that, look, as Americans, we ought to act as Americans. We ought to have some some way in which we can experience our civic obligations. William F. Buckley junior, at one point, wrote a whole book about gratitude. Said I'm not sure that the national service will necessarily solve all of our problems, but it's a way for Americans to give back, to understand that, you know, this country has done so many wonderful things for us. What can we do? Can we do this? So those are the the the three main recommendations. There's also the revitalization of civic spaces to allow and facilitate Americans to talk with one another. I am constantly amazed because I spend way too much time on social media. I mean, am I am one of the bad guys on this. I spend way too much time on Twitter. And so when I come to an event like this or anywhere else where there's actually real people, I'm really always amazed by how reasonable and thoughtful and kind people are. Because if you if you spend time on social media, you will think we're all at each other's throats and that every every, you know, conversation is like, how can I insult you? How can I do this? When in fact if Americans talk with one another, I think that and that we're not naive that it's that is there's a magic bullet there, but there are institutions in this country that can facilitate that. And it is that revitalization of civic life that I think that we need. It's the and because social media cannot can't compensate for that loss. I mean, are a society where bowling alone, where we've become so atomized, we don't actually talk to one another and we're not gonna fix any of these problems or trust one another unless we have those dialogues. One last comment before I turn it over to Jeffrey. One of the things that strikes me is that you can debate almost every issue if there is an assumption of goodwill on the part of the other person. If there is that assumption, then you can understand that every disagreement on an issue is not necessarily an indictment of the character or the principles of the other person, but that's one of the things that we are lacking in our country. So, again, these are the three things, a dramatic recommitment to civics education, to digital literacy, and perhaps to the concept of citizenship as embodied through voluntary national service. Service. Speaker 14: Jeff? Thank you so much, Charlie. Thank you for the report and thanks for asking I me to think you are absolutely right and the commission is absolutely right that a Sputnik moment for civic education is the key to preserving the future of the American Republic. Tony is right to start with Benjamin Franklin, and Franklin and Washington and Madison believed that without education in the science of government, as Washington put it, we would degenerate into the Athenian mob. Jefferson said democracy cannot survive ignorant and free, and the founders thought that unless citizens understood the structures of government, then we would be guided by reason, by passion rather than reason, and the entire experiment would collapse. So the first set of recommendations are crucially important. I wanna disaggregate the three recommendations. One is standards, the second is the substance of what's supposed to be taught, and the third is funding. On standards, I don't think there's gonna be a lot of disagreement. A number of states have adopted a requirement that kids pass the citizenship test to graduate from high school. We saw the noble but painful experience of the common core standards, were broadly adopted requiring civics and then became politically controversial. Most public schools do have some kind of civics requirement, although they're not allowed to use the words common core. And the bottom line is that there are a lot of standards and requirements, but not an agreement about what substantively should be taught to address the crisis in civic knowledge. Those statistics that the report quotes, a third of Americans can't name a single branch of government. Only a third can name all three. A majority of college students believe that the First Amendment allows the banning of hate speech, although the Supreme Court has unanimously held the opposite. This is a substantive crisis in civic knowledge, and the question is how to address it. It's gonna have to be done in the nonprofit sphere. And you note a lot of organizations, including the National Constitution Center, that are trying to address it. At the Aspen Ideas Festival last July, David Coleman, the head of the college board, announced a path breaking partnership with the Constitution Center, where the Constitution Center has created a curriculum to teach all three to 5,000,000 advanced placement students about the essence of the First Amendment. This online course, which is platformed on our interactive constitution, combines the top liberal and conservative scholars in America to talk about the essence of the First Amendment, what they agree and disagree about, videos with Supreme Court justices Kagan and Gorsuch talking about the First Amendment, less than plans for high school kids and then middle school kids about essential First Amendment questions, and most excitingly, constitutional exchanges that unite classrooms in red and blue America, Philadelphia and Kentucky, or California and North Dakota, to talk about First Amendment issues. It's an amazing platform, and it is necessary to bring it not only to AP kids but to all kids in America, to underserved kids, to charter school kids, to public school kids. So the distribution of a curriculum like this is crucially important. And I'm talking about substantive constitutional knowledge, Supreme Court case law, the principle that, the Supreme Court has said, speech can only be banned if it's intended to and likely to cause imminent violence. That principle from the Whitney in California case in 1927 reaffirmed in Brandenburg in 1969 is something that all of us must know and explain to our kids and apply to current controversies. This leads to the central question of funding, and I think you are absolutely right to call on philanthropists to fund substantive constitutional education, and I want, sitting here at Aspen in this distinguished setting, to say that American foundations and philanthropists have not been sufficiently attentive to funding substantive civic knowledge. The great foundations, Rockefeller and Carnegie and Annenberg, who you quoted, who in the 1980s devoted substantial resources to substantive civic knowledge, have ceased to do so. The National Constitution Center's interactive constitution, which has gotten 20,000,000 hits since it launched only three years ago, is funded, and I need to thank these generous funders, the John Templeton Foundation, the Niarchos Foundation, the Charles Koch Foundation, which is now trying to build bipartisan coalitions, have funded this. But the overall funding for civic education at a Niarchos conference is something is less than 1% of all philanthropic funding. And it's a disgrace. And this curriculum is not going to be created without philanthropic funding, and what we need to do is fund substantive knowledge so people can actually identify the three branches of government. When we have justices Gorsuch and Sotomayor going on Good Morning America and saying that it's a national scandal and we have this Knight commission agreeing with this, then we need to fund the substance of this curriculum. So it's important that Knight is committed to this effort, and you must, Alberto, bring in your fellow foundation heads and create coalitions of philanthropists, both foundations and individuals, so this is actually funded, both the substantive curriculum and the distribution of it. And that's the most tangible thing that this important commission can do. It can actually fund, the creation of bipartisan, civics curriculum and help it get distributed to, millions of kids across America. So we have the philanthropists have not done a good enough job recently. They've been distracted by politically contested functions, and that leads to the second category, which is civic engagement. Recently, in the past ten years, civics has become polarized between those who wanna get out the vote, who tend to be Democrats, and those at the moment who think that that's a partisan effort who tend to be Republicans. It's it's too bad that we're at a stage in our national history where the effort to declare election day a national holiday is considered a partisan event, but that's where we are. So we have to accept that and not confuse efforts to get out the vote with substantive constitutional knowledge and focus on actually teaching people about the constitution. That's why I think your second category of recommendations of simply bringing together people of different perspectives for face to face dialogues, although digital platforms can be helpful, are crucial. As the second panel said, people confronted with opposite points of view online on Twitter tend to become more polarized and more dug into their position than before. However, people who unite for face to face discussions over a period of time often open their minds to the arguments on the other side. And that's why I'm so excited about these virtual exchanges where kids can sign up on Zoom, and it's really thrilling to see a classroom in Kentucky talking to a classroom in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania about the First Amendment moderated by a judge about whether the First Amendment protects hate speech. That is scalable and it can bring together tens of thousands, millions of citizens for thoughtful dialogue and debate. And that second recommendation is absolutely crucial in this regard. National service is a noble goal. I happen to support it. General McChrystal came to the Constitution Center recently, and I admire the work Aspen is doing. I think it's a different goal than the effort to promote substantive constitutional and civics knowledge to distribute it and to fund it. And therefore, I wouldn't lump them in together. And if you can build support for it, that would be great. And it's very much in the Washingtonian spirit of civic republicanism, but it's a it's a separate set of issues. But I I I so I I just wanna end by emphasizing oh, and here's here's one other piece. Digital literacy is important, but it's not the same as constitutional knowledge. Yes, it's important for people to be able to distinguish fake from real news. It's important for them to be able to use the web thoughtfully and for all of us to stay off Twitter because simple self restraint and reading the Federalist Papers, which are so long that AP teachers have stopped assigning them and actually have to read them out loud in class now because kids won't take the time to read them on their own. Isn't that that was the most sobering thing I learned from an AP teacher. You can't even assign the Federalist Papers because they're too long. And originally, the Federalist Papers were published in the Pennsylvania Packet newspaper, which we have at the Constitution Center, for all citizens to read. They were published in the newspaper because the founders had faith that, as Madison put it, citizens reading long and complicated arguments could create a republic of letters guided by a group that he called the literati to be guided by reason. So that's really a that's a real problem. When in order to teach the Federalist Papers, you have to read it out loud and discuss it, but we need to teach the Federalist Papers, and we need to teach the basic structures of government so people can pass the citizenship test and not confuse that with using digital media thoughtfully and having good digital habits, is important, but again, a separate set of issues. So that is my takeaway from this crucial third section of the report. It is urgently important to fund substantive educational initiatives that will teach people about the constitution, and it is urgently important to bring together citizens of different perspectives to discuss them. And most importantly, it is urgently important for America's philanthropists, the great foundations and individuals to support this effort because if you don't, this material will not be created and this constitutional light will not be spread. So the future of the republic does indeed depend on this effort. Thank you so much. Speaker 5: So the the report ends with these two sentences. We are citizen sovereigns. We must act as sovereigns, take responsibility, and move forward. I think I wanna thank all of the commissioners, the foundation, the people who are in attendance here for taking the responsibility of looking at these recommendations and then acting on them. As I think Tony or maybe Jamie said at the beginning, these are intended as beginning points. It is a ongoing it is an ongoing dialogue. We know that there are other opinions that, will know, the commissioners and others will be expanding on. We urge you to tune in to the nightnight. Well, hashtag nightnightcom Twitter message. And I think we can take one or two questions and that would be that's about it because we did run a little longer. Yeah. Speaker 15: Mike Nelson. I'm Mike Nelson. I used to teach at Georgetown and the most popular class I taught was on scenario planning. I'm curious whether the commissioners spent any time looking at scenarios and particularly looking at what could happen if there was a really big disaster, a cyber attack that closed down electric grid, bioweapons. Is our media ready to tell people what is happening and what they need to do in case of a really serious nineteen o six San Francisco earthquake type event? No. Speaker 5: No. No and no. Next question. Speaker 16: Hi, Alex Howard. So I've written a lot about transparency and journalism in the past couple of years. I worked at a local nonprofit focused on sunshine and government. And I saw something really upsetting happen the last couple of years, which is the nation has become polarized around press freedom, around views of the press, and around the very idea that the public should be informed based upon shared facts. And we're going in the wrong direction, have gone in the wrong direction for a couple of years now without our political leaders, without our civic society coming up with an idea to do something about that in no small part because of a person who has not been named here. So let's say Voldemort down the street is gonna be talking about our union, which is profoundly divided right now and polarized. The Knight Foundation has done an amazing job in bringing together people to talk about this, but I don't see nationalists in the room. I don't see populism directly confronted here. And I'm concerned because my colleagues in other countries, whether they're in Hungary or Poland, whether they're trying to report on what's happened in The Philippines, they're being imprisoned. They're being murdered. Try to report upon organized crime in Mexico. Yes. There's a crisis in democracy. Yes. I agree with all of these recommendations. But what can we or should we do beyond just going to vote in two years right now to address a hate movement against journalism within our own borders and the existence of polarization that has been exacerbated against the very shared values that I think are fundamental to American democracy? What should we do about that? Because it can't just be saying newsrooms fix it. Speaker 8: Okay. Charlie? Well, I'm I will point out that there is language in this report that directly addresses the president's comments. And we discussed that at great length at on the commission how to deal with that. And, ultimately, I think there was a consensus that you cannot talk about trust media and democracy without talking about the fact that we have political leaders who are using that wedge to score political points and the the fact that you have the press being characterized as the enemy of the people. So we did address that, and there is I mean, that doesn't mean that we have a solution for it, but you're absolutely right. At some point, there has to be some pushback on all of that, that we can disagree on these issues, but the demonization and the attacks on the news media itself pose a real significant threat to our ability to engage in these dialogues. Now, again, that doesn't mean that the media does not, you know, have to do things to fix itself, but the the the demagogic, over the top attacks, do need to be confronted, and I give the commission a great deal of credit for for weighing in on that. Speaker 5: One last one last, question that's over there. I'm sorry. He he asked me for research. Speaker 3: Hi there. One quick question I Speaker 5: had And just identify yourself. Speaker 3: Oh, yes. My name is Sean Mickens. I had a specific question around how you tackled a question around generation around generations, particularly on the citizenship portion. Most of the recommendations that you shared so far seems as though they focus very heavily on kids. But most of the voting population for the next couple of generations are people who are long past the portion of needing to take a graduation exam. So I'm just very curious, like, how are we weaving in better ways that the existing voting demographics in this country are able to address this issue because I think the way we're talking about it is that it's slightly more timely than waiting for generations of students to go through this education process. Speaker 8: I'm really glad you asked that point because, yeah, I mean, it's you know, part of it is, you know, it is gonna be hard to educate the American people, so let's, you know, focus on on the future generation. But what is the problem right now is the people who are voting. Well, this is the kind of thing that Jeffrey is working on, and we do talk about the need to engage the entire population in this kind of relearning of civic values. So, you know, yes, that that is a legitimate point. It would be wrong to simply put the entire burden on the kids or on on, you know, K-twelve education. That that obviously is is not going to be sufficient. It's necessary, but not sufficient. Do you want I mean and Jeffrey's work is I think, you know, much of it is aimed at the population as a whole, Speaker 14: Right? We must be lifelong learners of the constitution. Was Jefferson and Brandeis' point. And it's great that the commission recommends that civics be taught in colleges And and adults have to be engaged through through public programs and the same virtual exchanges that can unite classrooms can also unite adults. And this interactive constitution and other materials like it, I learn from it every day, and you should too. And we have a response. You know, in the end, it just comes back to ourselves. We need to spend our time cultivating our faculties of reason and not tweeting and surfing and browsing. And that's on all of us each day, and we have to inspire on our fellow citizens. Speaker 8: I'm gonna tweet out that Speaker 14: learners as well. Don't wait until after the show. Great point. Really, really, really important. Speaker 2: So I want to just take this opportunity to thank everyone for today and everyone that made today possible. I just wanted I'm worried a little bit that we may have given some false impression, and I just wanna clarify. Are politicians capable of using fear and anger to divide us? They are. They have been for a very long time. The antidote to that there are many, but the most powerful are the people. This commission, I think we were absolutely unified in our faith in the citizenry of all ages. Yes, Speaker 0: you Speaker 2: can inflame and yes, the technology reinforces the divisions, but we are capable of something very different than that. The history of the country tells us that we are capable. And the key, I think, in many of the comments today is, you know, we looked for technological fixes for this. I confess, I walked into the commission thinking we'll just tweak the algorithms and make you confront stuff you don't like and agree with and I was informed and learned how that might backfire. But I think the key that I heard in this regard was you can't start with people who are violently opposed and just say, okay, now work it out. You have to develop trust even between those two people first or between the classroom or the library in two different parts of the country. We have to begin that work and it begins with us. And I believe and I think the commission fully believes that the American people and beyond America, because these are global issues, we are capable of this. We are capable of better, of letting the better angels win, changing our tools and our approach so that they don't feed the lesser angels of our spirits. We're betting on the people. We, the people. Thank you all for being here today. Speaker 8: Well, was great. It was important. Speaker 4: It was

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

This has been planned over many generations. Notice the language: Recommendations of the Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy. Remember the members of the Commission, including Fisk Johnson? Is anything published in Racine without Fisk and the Johnson family’s approval? What are “Communities in a Democracy?” What is the National Endowment for Democracy? Why Racine? Council for a Community of Democracies is a US-based organisation. "Drawing on the historical precedent of the American Revolution, and reacting to the worst century of war in human history, the first CCD began in 1979 as the Committees of Correspondence, uniting private citizens in many countries around an idea that later became the Committee for a Community of the Democracies (CCD). Its first president was James R. Huntley, who was about to publish his landmark book, Uniting the Democracies. Its mission was to advance a greater sense of unity and civilization among the world’s democracies — in a sense public diplomacy in reverse, the public educating its governments. Later presidents included American University Dean William E. Olson, Sam De Palma, former Assistant Secretary of State, and David Popper, former US Ambassador to Chile. "After the U.S. election in 1980, CCD set as its goal influencing the foreign policy of the new Reagan Administration. Two years later President Reagan made his famous speech at Westminster Hall armed with ideas provided by CCD, calling upon nations worldwide to promote democracy by fostering the infrastructure of democracy — free press, unions, political parties, and the rule of law. Later that year a CCD paper dealing broadly with the goal of a community of democracies led to endorsement by President Reagan of a bi-partisan American political foundation headed by Hon. William E. Brock “to determine how the United States can best contribute as a nation to the global campaign for democracy now gathering force.” The first international meeting of that foundation, held in November 1982, led to the “Declaration of London” calling for an association of democracies composed of all genuine democracies. "The next year President Reagan presented Congress with his “Project Democracy” and a request for $31 million earmarked for establishment of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). In 1985, NED provided funding for a major CCD conference in Racine, Wisconsin attended by 36 representatives from 26 countries. Opening with a letter from Reagan, the Wingspread conference adopted, among other resolutions, a proposal to establish a worldwide association of democracies and a proposal for a caucus of the democracies at the United Nations." [1] https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Council_for_a_Community_of_Democracies CCD grants from US Department of State? Who did Mike Benz work for? Robert Hunger? John Brademas & Aspen Institute? James Huntley, Atlantic Council & Battelle? Frank Carlucci? Rockefeller? RAND? Trilateral? CFR? CSIS? Carlyle? Hudson? General Dynamics? Hodding Carter and Knight Foundation? John Whitehead of Evanston? Brookings, Goldman Sachs & Aspen? John Lehman and Partnership for a Secure America? National Security Council? Condi Rice & Mike Flynn? Upon its founding, the NED assumed some former acThe National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a quasi-autonomous non-governmental organization in the United States founded in 1983 to advance democracy worldwide,[2][3][4] by promoting political and economic institutions, such as political groups, trade unions, free markets, and business groups. Upon its founding, the NED assumed some former activities of the CIA. Political groups, activists, and some governments have said the NED has been an instrument of United States foreign policy helping to foster regime change. Via @DenyTheMark2020

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Can the Knight Legacy Lead to Sustainability Upon his return to the United States, Knight traveled to California with $5,000 won in crapshooting to contemplate going into the cattle business. Instead, he followed his father’s wishes, returned to Akron and became a ✏️sports journalist, writing under the pseudonym “Walker,” because, he confessed, “I was ashamed of the stuff. I didn’t write well enough.” Nevertheless, by 1925 John S. Knight was already managing editor of the Beacon Journal and upon his father’s death in 1933, in the depths of the Great Depression, he inherited the positions of editor and publisher, as well as ownership of the paper itself. ✏️ Along with E.W. Scripps, Frank Gannett, Robert McCormick, Joseph Pulitzer, and William Randolph Hearst, John S. Knight was one of a handful of men who led American journalism into one of its most questionable periods, when family-owned community-based papers were swallowed up by national media conglomerates. In 1937 Knight purchased the Miami Herald for $2 million, bought and closed down the Miami Tribune and Akron Times Press, and acquired control of the Detroit Free Press and Chicago Daily News. After merging with Ridder Publications, Inc. in 1974, Knight-Ridder became the largest newspaper publisher in the United States with media outlets in over 26 cities. It should be noted, however, that unlike the centralized management of the Hearst Corporation, John S. Knight believed that each paper should be largely managed within its own community. As the Knight media empire expanded, James L. Knight, John’s younger brother by 15 years, played an increasingly active part in the company’s financial management. According to an NY Times obituary, “James Knight … was the financial brain behind the partnership. John Knight was editorial director.” Source: MediaShift 2008

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Warren Buffett's investment firm, Berkshire Hathaway, made significant investments in Gannett, a major newspaper publisher. In 1994, Buffett spent over $335 million to acquire a significant stake in Gannett, which at the time published 190 newspapers, including USA Today. Buffett's decision to invest in Gannett was based on his understanding of the newspaper business, which he had firsthand experience with as a paper boy, and his belief in the company's strong brand and regional monopolies. However, in 2013, Berkshire Hathaway sold off 1.7 million shares in Gannett, worth about $38 million, indicating a shift in Buffett's confidence in the company.

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

If you control the information, you control the population: Yes. Gannett is a very important connection to Racine (Rotary, Election interference, Aspen Inst., Knight Foundation, Freemasons, Shriners etc) >Frank Gannett > Cornell University Alum > Trustee of Cornell University > Cornellian Council > Founder of Gannett Company > 1935 established the Frank E. Gannett Newspaper Foundation > controlling owner of Gannett Co., Inc. when he died. >Gannett Corporation > 92 daily newspapers including USA Today > John Jeffry Louis > Appointed to Gannett Board Served as a director of Legacy Gannett’s former parent from 2006 to 2019 Chairman of the Board of Legacy Gannett from June 2015 through November 2019 Co-Founder of Parson Capital Corporation Director of The Olayan Group 📌Director of S.C. Johnson and Son, Inc ___ Members of the Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy (chairs and commissioners include(d) executives from SC Johnson, Gannett, Aspen, PBS Frontlines, Facebook, Cornell, and so many more) here is an example from 2023 https://knightfoundation.org/knight-commission-on-trust-media-and-democracy/

Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy In 2017, the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program, in partnership with the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, established the Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy. Currently, trust in the major institutions of American democracy has fallen to troubling lows amid a rapidly changing information ecosystem. Without trust, democracy cannot function. It… knightfoundation.org

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Gannett was sued for enabling sexu@| abuse of paperboys in New York and Arizona. How many? See list of board members and major shareholders. https://www.gannettpaperboys.com/Gannett

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

The [SC] Johnson Family Legacy at Cornell University January 28, 2017 ”Their friendship, guidance and generosity have helped to shape the university we know today – from the Herbert F. Johnson ✏️Museum of Art, to the Imogene Powers Johnson Center for ✏️Birds and Biodiversity, and the ✏️Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management to the newly named college of business.” Herbert F. Johnson Jr: Trustee from 1947-72 and a presidential councilor from 1972 until his death in 1978, committed funds that allowed Cornell to build the art museum bearing his name. ▫️met his future wife, Gertrude, the daughter of Olaf Brauner, a Cornell professor from 1896 to 1939 and founder of the university’s Department of Art. Samuel C. Johnson ’50 was a trustee from 1966-88, presidential councilor from 1988 until his death in 2004 ▫️Johnson School Advisory Council and Lab of Ornithology Administrative Board ▫️Imogene Powers Johnson ’52: a presidential councilor and member of the Lab of Ornithology Administrative Board SC Johnson Chairman and CEOCEO Fisk Johnson ▫️Fisk and his three siblings all attended Cornell. Fisk holds five degrees spanning the College of Arts and Sciences, the College of Engineering, and the Johnson School, and he has served as a trustee, trustee emeritus, and presidential councilor, as well as an adviser to the Johnson Graduate School of Management. His brother ✏️Curt ’77 and sisters Helen ’78 and Winifred (Winnie) ’81 also attended Arts and Sciences. ✏️Curt and Helen are former members of Cornell University Council and Helen has served on the Athletics Alumni Advisory Committee and was inducted into the Cornell Athletic Hall of Fame. In 1984, then-President Frank H.T. Rhodes said of the Johnson School gift: “… there are certain events in the history of great institutions that represent turning points. Before these singular events, the future offers one set of possibilities. After these events, the whole range of possibilities is changed.” Side note: Frank H.T. Rhodes is a descendent of Cecil Rhodes - as in the Rhodes Scholar 👉🏼Geology National Science Board Member Educational Policy Advisory Committee Board of Directors of General Electric 👉🏼 Rhodes joined the University of Michigan faculty as professor of geology and mineralogy in 1968. In 1971, he was named dean of the College of Literature, Science and the Arts. Prior to assuming the presidency at Cornell he served for three years as vice president of academic affairs at Michigan. (✍🏼 dates and states? > North Fox Island, Boys Town connection? Francis (Frank) Duffield Sheldon, Master of Science in Geology)

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

"Cornell is closely connected with Racine and is the leading institution for the global ✏️hotel industry. The CiA doesn't heavily recruit from Cornell by coincidence."

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Great-great-grandson of another S. Curtis (Curt) Johnson, who founded the storied S.C. Johnson company Racine, WI The Billionaire Who Served Just 3 Months For Sexual Assault (https://www.forbes.com/sites/cartercoudriet/2019/06/28/curt-johnson-billionaire-sexual-assault/?sh=78b2aed77956)

The Billionaire Who Served Just 3 Months For Sexual Assault Curt Johnson, a billionaire heir to the powerful Johnson family, became a symbol of privilege when he served just three months in jail after admitting he abused his step-daughter. His spokesperson insists he wants to make amends. forbes.com

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

NPR was conceived at Wingspread and Racine has been the model and epicenter of propaganda since the early days of publishing. What other decisions were made at Wingspread? (there’s a 🧵 for that) Racine is also connected with modern propaganda and censorship. 👉🏼Anna Makanju is one of the lead censorship agents with ✏️Soros and ✏️Zuckerberg who focused her attention on Racine to pave the way for what has happened in recent years. Brad Smith is the key advisor to Bill Gates and other big tech leaders. He is the President of Microsoft and grew up in Racine. Also partners with the United Nations #STARGATE #FoxConn William Lutz is the godfather of doublespeak who learned at Racine College, and Bill Biggerstaff is one of the founders of the Silicon Valley Bank and Community Foundation that controlled the venture capital industry and the rise of the big tech empire. Wisconn Valley is the new Silicon Valley where the 8th Wonder of the World deal was made. Wisconsin is closely connected with CERN and quantum computing. #STARGATE #FoxConn Where was the Internet unveiled? What plans did Frank Lloyd Wright have for that location, Crystal Heights? What else happened at the Hotel where the Internet was unveiled? How did they spy before the Internet? Art in Embassies is also closely connected with Racine, and only gained acceptance when collections from Johnson and Case partnered with the program. The heir to Knight Foundation, Marjorie Crane lives in Racine. 👉🏼NOTHING gets published in Racine without an ok from [them]. They control 👉🏼all sides to ensure their desired outcomes. Control the information, control the people. Via Voat

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies 🚩 Third Try at World Order (1977) ▫️Management of Sustainable Growth ▫️Committee on Remote Sensing for Development of the National Academy of Sciences 🚩 Weather Modification Advisory Board: to develop a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification policy and a national program of weather modification research and development ▫️Planetary Politics 🚩 Infusing the K-12 curriculum with a GLOBAL perspective ▫️YMCA: international twists to all their programming right down to the community "Y" 🚩 DECEPTIVELY blur the line between domestic and international "The first birds off the telephone wire." 👀 THIS WILL BE THE LAST GENERAL MAILING FROM THE ASPEN INSTITUTE S PROGRAM IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS In the process, we have convened 84 workshops with a total of 2404 participants from a broad spectrum of professions and disciplines and every part of the world, using all the Aspen Institute seminar facilities (Aspen and Baca, Colorado; the Wye Plantation on the Eastern Shore of Maryland; West Berlin; and Punalu'u, Hawaii) and also meeting in Princeton, NJ; New York; Washington; Dedham and Cambridge, MA; Houston and Austin, TX; Wingspread (Racine, Wisconsin); La Jolla, CA; Tokyo, Japan (International House);- Cairo, Egypt; Gajereh, Iran; Ajijic, Mexico; and Nairobi, Kenya. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/print/1584177 https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP05T00644R000200690011-6.pdf Document Title: THIS WILL BE THE LAST GENERAL MAILING FROM THE ASPEN INSTITUTE S PROGRAM IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

The exercise by the “Aspen Digital Hack-and-Dump Working Group” involved an 11-day scenario in Oct. 2020 (images via the New York Post) "Early cooperation among newsrooms turns out to be key," Aspen organizer Garrett Graff wrote of the event on Oct. 7, 2020. He suggested that reporters "check with other news organizations" before publishing stories based on Hunter Biden emails. He also advised that news outlets speak with "intelligence agencies and law enforcement." - Washington Free Beacon The Aspen Digital Hack-and-Dump Working Group is a part of the ✏️Aspen Institute's cybersecurity initiatives. It held an exercise in September 2020 that involved a scenario lasting 11 days, beginning with the imaginary release of falsified records related to Hunter Biden's employment by the Ukrainian energy company Burisma. The goal of the exercise was to ✏️shape how the media would cover the story and how 👉🏼social media companies would handle it.

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Let’s take another look at the SC Johnson’s, Cornell, and Art — There would be no Art in Embassies without Racine, Wisconsin. Hot Art, Cold War - Southern and Eastern European Writing on American Art 1945-1990 In 1963, Art: USA: Now, the traveling exhibitions of the Johnson collection, included Greece on its European itinerary. Athens was the second stop after London. As Michael L. Karen notes, “Edward R. Murrow, who was then director of the USIA … was particularly excited about the offer by S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (the floor wax giant) to send its large collection of contemporary American art around the world.” The exhibition of the Johnson collection was probably the last major event organized by the USIA/USIS until the 1980s, since, as noted earlier, the US authorities started focusing more on educational programs and because US aid was gradually undergoing significant budget cuts. These initiatives should be appraised in relation to the political developments in Greece, which were a cause for alarm to the US authorities, namely, the rise of EDA (the United Democratic Left Party). In 1958, the members of illegal political organizations that were disbanded at the instigation of the then banned communist party, joined EDA, which then became a mass party, and the opposition in the 1958 elections. Via @DenyTheMark2020

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

1989 Gannett and Knight-Ridder implemented a joint operating agency to combat the decline in newspaper advertising revenues in Detroit, Michigan. The cooperative venture was the largest ever merging of two competing newspapers' business operations. The arrangement called for the Knight-Ridder's Free Press and Gannett's Detroit News to divide revenues equally. {Tanya} https://www.company-histories.com/Gannett-Company-Inc-Company-History.html

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Knight Foundation $100,000,000.00 to Detroit ▫️Sphinx Organization ▫️Social Justice ▫️Transform Lives ▫️Education ▫️Art ▫️Performing Arts ▫️Usher in new sustainable future Totally controlled and brainwashed Some grants attached {Tanya}

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Mr. Gannett also was noted for his philanthropic support of research, especially in the newspaper and aviation industries and in the fields of health and medicine. One of the projects he supported produced the Teletypesetter, a typesetting device which can be operated at long distances by electrical impulses. Another was a $500,000 grant by the Gannett Newspaper Foundation to build a student health clinic at Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. He also was keenly interested in the development of public recreation facilities. Honors conferred upon Mr. Gannett included the Civic Medal of the Rochester Museum of Arts and Sciences, received jointly with his wife; honorary membership in Phi Beta Kappa; the Navy’s Distinguished Public Service Award; an honorary degree of doctor of journalism from Bradley University and a long list of other honorary doctor’s and master’s degrees. Mr. Gannett’s newspaper ventures began with his purchase in 1906 of a half-interest in the Elmira, N. Y., Gazette. H/t @bn9202 https://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org/biographies/frank-gannett/

Gannett, Frank (1876-1957) | Harvard Square LibraryHarvard Square LibraryGannett, Frank (1876-1957) | Harvard Square Library The Gannett Company, founded by Frank Gannett in Rochester in 1906, is an international corporation with headquarters in McLean, Virginia. Its daily newspaper group circulation is more than 7 million and includes USA Today, a highly popular, nationally distributed daily. Frank Gannett Dies: A Report from the Unitarian Register, February 1958 Frank Gannett, 81, Rochester, N.Y., harvardsquarelibrary.org

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

(Jan. 28, 2014) — The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation today announced that it will invest $1 million in a fund to encourage innovation and experimentation in nonprofit news and public media organizations. Money controls the narrative. “Citizen Journalists?” “We are the news now?” In 2017, the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program, in partnership with the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, established the Knight Commission on Trust, Media and Democracy In November 2019 Racine County Eye received a grant. The org became a community platform and sustainable business. https://aspendigital.org/trusted-news-media/ https://racinecountyeye.com/2020/02/06/racine-county-eye-rolls-out-a-new-look/ WordPress; Google News Initiative; The Lenfest Institute for Journalism; ConsenSys, the venture studio backing Civil Media; and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. https://lenfestinstitute.org/solutions-resources/lenfest-institute-teams-with-creators-of-wordpress-com-google-civil-and-knight-to-develop-a-next-generation-publishing-platform-for-digital-news-startups/ Automattic, the parent company of WordPress, and its partners Spirited Media and News Revenue Hub, have secured $2.4 million in funding for the first year of the project, which will be developed on WordPress's cloud-based platform and incorporate many of the best practices in digital publishing. Google, through the Google News Initiative, is taking the lead in backing the project and has committed $1.2 million. Other funders include The Lenfest Institute for Journalism, which is contributing $400,000; ConsenSys, the venture studio backing Civil Media, which is contributing $350,000; and The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, which is contributing $250,000. An additional $200,000 from a fifth source is expected to be contributed toward the project later this month. How much did Soros fund? https://knightfoundation.org/ways-to-support-local-news-and-democracy-in-the-digital-age/ Local journalists are at the frontline of communities, investigating and delivering the news that matters most to residents. Their future and the survival of their profession are critically entwined with the health of our communities and our democracy. And they are disappearing.

Aspen Digital Aspen Digital envisions a future where technology and information empower communities and strengthen democracy. aspendigital.org
Racine County Eye rolls out a new look | Racine County Eye Today is a really big day for the Racine County Eye. racinecountyeye.com
Lenfest Institute teams with creators of WordPress.com, Google, Civil, and Knight to Develop a Next-Generation Publishing Platform for Digital News Startups Lenfest Institute teams with creators of WordPress.com, Google, Civil, and Knight to Develop a Next-Generation Publishing Platform for Digital News Startups A group of news industry leaders is banding together to develop an advanced open-source publishing and revenue-generating platform for news organizations. The effort is designed to address some of the persistent obstacles to creating… lenfestinstitute.org
Support local news and democracy in the digital age Local journalists are at the frontline of communities, investigating and delivering the news that matters most to residents. Their future and the survival of their profession is critically entwined with the health of our communities and our democracy. And they are disappearing. Confronted with sinking revenues, local news organizations are shutting their doors and leaving… knightfoundation.org

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Aspen Institute Knight Foundation Youth Media Literacy

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

@mirrorfren Can you believe that this has been in the works for a while now? I’m just now aware, thanks to @DenyTheMark2020 but the Aspen Institute and Knight Foundation have been planning on this since at least 2006. Maybe even prior. https://t.co/EwB6E302PH

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Committee of 300 https://t.co/uNrggw0Rw5

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

This has been planned over many generations. Notice the language: Recommendations of the Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy. Remember the members of the Commission, including Fisk Johnson? Is anything published in Racine without Fisk and the Johnson family’s approval? What are “Communities in a Democracy?” What is the National Endowment for Democracy? Why Racine? Council for a Community of Democracies is a US-based organization. "Drawing on the historical precedent of the American Revolution, and reacting to the worst century of war in human history, the first CCD began in 1979 as the Committees of Correspondence, uniting private citizens in many countries around an idea that later became the Committee for a Community of the Democracies (CCD). Its first president was James R. Huntley, who was about to publish his landmark book, Uniting the Democracies. Its mission was to advance a greater sense of unity and civilization among the world’s democracies — in a sense public diplomacy in reverse, the public educating its governments. Later presidents included American University Dean William E. Olson, Sam De Palma, former Assistant Secretary of State, and David Popper, former US Ambassador to Chile. "After the U.S. election in 1980, CCD set as its goal influencing the foreign policy of the new Reagan Administration. Two years later President Reagan made his famous speech at Westminster Hall armed with ideas provided by CCD, calling upon nations worldwide to promote democracy by fostering the infrastructure of democracy — free press, unions, political parties, and the rule of law. Later that year a CCD paper dealing broadly with the goal of a community of democracies led to endorsement by President Reagan of a bi-partisan American political foundation headed by Hon. William E. Brock “to determine how the United States can best contribute as a nation to the global campaign for democracy now gathering force.” The first international meeting of that foundation, held in November 1982, led to the “Declaration of London” calling for an association of democracies composed of all genuine democracies. "The next year President Reagan presented Congress with his “Project Democracy” and a request for $31 million earmarked for establishment of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). In 1985, NED provided funding for a major CCD conference in Racine, Wisconsin attended by 36 representatives from 26 countries. Opening with a letter from Reagan, the Wingspread conference adopted, among other resolutions, a proposal to establish a worldwide association of democracies and a proposal for a caucus of the democracies at the United Nations." [1] https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Council_for_a_Community_of_Democracies CCD grants from US Department of State? Who did Mike Benz work for? Robert Hunger? John Brademas & Aspen Institute? James Huntley, Atlantic Council & Battelle? Frank Carlucci? Rockefeller? RAND? Trilateral? CFR? CSIS? Carlyle? Hudson? General Dynamics? Hodding Carter and Knight Foundation? John Whitehead of Evanston? Brookings, Goldman Sachs & Aspen? John Lehman and Partnership for a Secure America? National Security Council? Condi Rice & Mike Flynn? The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a quasi-autonomous non-governmental organization in the United States founded in 1983 to advance democracy worldwide,[2][3][4] by promoting political and economic institutions, such as political groups, trade unions, free markets, and business groups. Upon its founding, the NED assumed some former activities of the CIA. Political groups, activists, and some governments have said the NED has been an instrument of United States foreign policy helping to foster regime change. Via @DenyTheMark2020

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

Aspen Institute and Knight Foundation Digital and Media Literacy plans of actions (a few examples) https://t.co/kHoRyASKbC

@SuaSponte_1776 - 🇺🇸Quinn🇺🇸

@threadreaderapp pls unroll

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 2:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m asking if they’ve got a criminal grand jury on Ed Martin, per Steve Bannon. Do they know about the secret Council for National Policy and Racine, Wisconsin? What about Mike Benz? Why would Mike run a Frame Game op on Racine? Why would Flynn run honeypots?

@DenyTheMark2020 - The Parousia

@down_zulu @EdMartinDOJ They’ve got a criminal grand jury on Ed Martin? Says Steve Bannon? Does the grand jury know about the “secret” Council for National Policy and Racine, Wisconsin? What about Mike Benz? Why would Mike try to run a Frame Game op on Racine? Why would Flynn run honeypots? #WTHisRacine https://t.co/GIxnFOTTm8

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 1:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been deep in research claiming that treasonous industrialists, bankers, and intelligence officers tied to the BIS, OSS, Knights of Malta, and Nazi-German-Swiss gold heists are related—or within one degree—to the same Holy Crusading Order of Genocidal Fæguettes that did 9/11.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

lol I’ve been deep in research and working on showing everyone that the treasonous industrialists, bankers and intelligence officers involved in the BIS - OSS - Knights of Malta - German - Swedish - Swiss - Nazi - Gold Heist in WWII are related or (or 1 degrees separation) members of the same Holy Crusading Order of Genocidal Fæguettes that did 9/11.

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 12:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A PSA cautions against pretending military service; tensions rise over claimed stolen valor and alleged federal involvement. QTrashMcGill demands proof (DD214) and questions if the other party is a fed. PopularEddie alleges Ann betrayed them to federal agents and that she knew others’ movements, including gun-range plans. GooBiiSnacks questions the source of the warning. JustTheHound declines involvement, says he recorded events, and hints at further fallout when Jonathan returns.

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

PSA Do not be the person that claims that someone wasn’t in the military but is *checks notes*🧐 …working for the military. Not saying Unk is a bad guy, but I will not be accused of stolen valor, threatened (I don’t mean actual threat), & ALSO be accused of being a fed/the fgt that “turned Jonathan in” without putting it on blast. Suck my Reich nut, fggt.

@QTrashMcGill - Unkle QTrash McGill

@GooBiiSnacks You've proven nothing, Mike. Those screenshots don't associate you with military service. Another Fail. Let's see your legitimate DD214. Not hard, Mike. Btw- that VA Form 29-1905m is a joke. Are YOU a FED, Mike. Why don't you deny it? PSA - Don't "Be like Mike." https://t.co/hVuiCA9msD

@PopularEddie - MR.D

You dumb MF . Ann turned him in . Then disappeared. She told me everything. She even collaborated with the AZ FEDS . It started when he posted bout 🔥 down memorials and sin o gogs . Then he went after stop antiseptic account . He posted she should be shot . And I was told to stay away from mike because he will get me in trouble. Same with matty .i warned decent It was coming. You are punching the air. Ann was fed . I talked like a civil person and got information. Ask @JustTheHound . I told him everything BEFORE it happened. Good day

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill WTF?

@PopularEddie - MR.D

@GooBiiSnacks @QTrashMcGill Ask away. It’s all out now . I thought you knew anyway. I’ll be around. Keep up the good work. 👊🏻

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill Sure, WHO told you to stay away from me & Matty? AND with what supportive & reasonable justification?

@PopularEddie - MR.D

@GooBiiSnacks @QTrashMcGill Ann Marie . A fed . She knew I was talking to you and matty . She knew everything. She only went into detail on matty because he lived very close to me . She knew he suggested we go to a local gun range together. . Let me dig a lil .

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill Wait, are you talking about the literal jew shill account that “informed” you?

@PopularEddie - MR.D

@GooBiiSnacks @QTrashMcGill Yes BEFORE EVERYTHING. Ask @JustTheHound . I already explained everything. What else do I need to say. You’re getting mad that I’m saying this out loud.

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@PopularEddie @QTrashMcGill @JustTheHound I’m not mad.

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

Leave me out of this. I didn't talk to that twat. You guys are the ones who spent days (3 weeks) with her. I just watched and recorded it all. Now your asking for my help? Your all batshit crazy. When Jonathan gets out, I hope he contacts me and asks me what I found. Half of JQ going to get a wake up call. Hey Ketty, tell Jonathan to contact me if he wants to see what he missed. I watched the coop while he was away. The rest of you can get rekt.

Saved - January 16, 2026 at 9:30 PM

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

Shabot Shalom b$tchs. 👂🏻 https://t.co/jwr9Tismb3

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

So, can I put a check mark on the left side of my chart now? @Meowllian @TimmyGs_312 @ImZeroDayz @TruCheetos listen audio on last 2 @Meowllian you mentioned you wanted to hear Ryan and Jonathans conversation about memory lane? 🫴🏻 "Bitcoin. "Nobody can prove you have it" right Sam?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The group discusses various connections and claims related to the Iron Dome program and individuals involved. Key points mentioned: - Erica’s father is said to be the chairman of Raytheon and to do extensive work on the Iron Dome. - Sean Maguire is described as “one of the key people running cover up for the identity of the killer” and is accused of pushing support for a person named Robinson, as well as supporting Bill Ackman, who is said to have offered a bribe. - The conversation references Truth and Ian and includes an assertion about Desi clarifying these connections. - Jonathan is highlighted for his exceptional ability to recite information; there are anecdotes about long sessions with him and the intensity of his contributions. There is also discussion about the challenges editors face due to Jonathan’s frequent changes of online usernames after being deplatformed, making it hard to track his accounts. - Other names appear in the dialogue: Lunae, Falu, Desi, Ian, Sam Parker, and Bill Ackman. - There is a mention of the workload on editors who compile and clip Jonathan’s videos, expressed as sympathy for their task. - There is a casual aside about a “big boobs” vendor reference and a note that the Israeli girl was discussed in DMs, with a disclaimer that the speaker is not the person being referenced. - Regarding the Iron Dome, it is stated that there are three main companies involved in hosting, overseeing, maintaining, and keeping it operational; one of these companies is Rafael (the sentence is cut off, but Rafael is identified as one of the three). The dialogue emphasizes alleged ties between prominent figures and defense contractors, the role of individuals in disseminating or concealing information, and the logistical and social challenges of content creation and attribution within this online discourse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With Jonathan, and then I believe it's Lunae and Falu, and we'll go from there. Speaker 1: Yeah. I wanted to who who the fuck said that? Speaker 0: It was me. Speaker 2: Hi, miss. Hi, miss. Speaker 1: Hi. I I wanted to give Truth and Ian a shout out because to add to something that Desi said or clarify a little bit. Because I understand it, and Ian correct me if I'm wrong on this, but Erica's father is the chairman of Raytheon is and does extensive work on the on the Iron Dome. And Sean Maguire, who was one of the key people or has been one of the key people running cover up for the identity of the killer and really pushing the Speaker 2: Clipping in and out. Just give me a heads up. Speaker 1: To support this kid, you know, Robinson, and even supporting Bill Ackman who is the one who offered the bribe. Speaker 2: Hey, Justin. You gotta you're outside or somewhere away from your Wi Fi. You keep kinda clipping in and out. Just give me Yeah. Speaker 1: I was doing that on purpose, Ryan. My my bad, buddy. Is it is it okay now? Speaker 0: Yeah. You know how to put it on voice isolation. Right? You you you just have a loud ass background. I don't Speaker 2: know if it's It's not the the outside doesn't bother me. It's just the fact that he was his Wi Fi was cutting in and out. That's what was you're clipping there for a minute. I don't care about the crickets. Speaker 1: That's Don't ask me personal questions like that in public in Speaker 0: front Speaker 1: of Speaker 0: other people. My bad. Speaker 1: Come on now. But but yeah. Speaker 0: Can you explain to people very quickly, like, just a nutshell version why the Raytheon piece is so important? Maybe people don't know what that is. Like, if if if people I I feel Speaker 2: like Yeah. You guys don't know who Jonathan is, let me just give you a little credit, man. This guy, again, like Ian and Sam Parker, there are very few people who have this gift that Jonathan has, and he I think he might have it better than he's, like, on the level with Truth Teller. His ability to recite stuff I sat down with him for, what was it, like, five hours, Jonathan. This dude, like, at one point, was like, bro, I don't think I've talked in the last hour. And he's like, oh, shit. I'm so sorry, bro. I'm like, no, dude. You're fucking killing it, but I need a I need a drink of water or a smoke or something. Like and he's like, alright. My bad. My bad. I was like, no, dude. You're fucking on fire, bro. Like, don't stop, man. So he's been absolutely killing it. I just sent him all the Speaker 1: whole videos too. So bad for your editors, dude. I was like, they've got so much to clip here. I felt so bad for editors. But I appreciate I again, I appreciate you coming and and doing that. That was very kind. But Well, Speaker 2: the only thing my editors don't like, Jonathan, is the fact that your that your username is tie changed three times because you keep getting deplatformed. So they're like, bro, where is Jonathan's shit going? I'm like, I don't know, dude. Just fuck it. Speaker 0: Just He's changed it, like, a dozen since I Speaker 2: met hard, dude. It's so hard to keep up with my computer. Speaker 0: At least 20. Speaker 2: I gotta go through, like, my account because it it matters how many people you follow versus the amount of people that follow you. And I'm like, gosh. Damn it, Jonathan. You got, like, 20 accounts. You gotta go figure out what all your old accounts were. And you make a completely different name every time. I'm like, bro, just stick with the same one. So when I search for you, I can figure out, oh, yeah. He's got a new one. There it is. But, no, it's always something different. Oh, they find me that. Speaker 0: Now he went to a vendor with big boobs. Did you see the big boob one? That's funny. What happened to the big two, girl? Yeah. I don't Speaker 1: I did. That is good. The Israeli girl. I had had so many people in my DMs. I'm like, I promise I'm not the one. This is not this is not the slide into my DMs for you right now. But, Speaker 0: anyway But that's the Raytheon. That's yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. So the Iron Dome has basically three main companies that are involved with hosting it, overseeing it, maintenance, and making sure it's operational at all times. And those three companies are Rafael
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker advocates downsizing all assets and resources, especially for public figures who are fighting a public battle and have a social media presence. The key goal is to maintain anonymity by moving wealth into Bitcoin so others cannot know you have it. Keeping funds on centralized exchanges or in a nameable account makes them visible and traceable, which the speaker warns against. The recommended strategy is to transfer wealth into Bitcoin and ensure it remains untraceable by using cold storage in an air-gapped, multisignature wallet. The idea is that once funds are in Bitcoin, they effectively disappear from scrutiny and cannot be proven to belong to you if properly secured. To implement this, one should convert assets into Bitcoin and transfer them to a cold storage setup that uses air-gapped security and multisig authorization. The speaker emphasizes the risk of losing access by keeping assets in traditional, monitored locations; specifically, if you leave Bitcoin on a centralized exchange, it can be seen and tied to you. Finally, the speaker notes a harsh consequence: if you conduct this process and then lose the private keys, you lose all the Bitcoin. In other words, the method hinges on secure, private control of keys, and the trade-off is the possibility of total loss if the keys are misplaced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gotta get your fucking wealth out of the system. You need to be downsizing all of your assets, all of your resources, especially if you're gonna be a public figure and you're gonna be fighting this good fight. If you have any public presence on social media and you're not fucking anonymous, you need to be downsizing your assets. You need to be completely light on your feet, move as much of your wealth into Bitcoin, and then it's in Bitcoin. Right? So nobody knows you have it. Nobody can fucking prove that you got it. Once you get it into Bitcoin, it's gone. So it doesn't exist. They're knew you and take you from it unless you're stupid enough to leave it on a fucking centralized exchange in an area where they can obviously see that it's in your name and you have it. But after you get into a cold storage air gap multisig wallet, you know, just go on a boat ride and you fucking lose your private keys and it sucks. You lost all your Bitcoin. Oh, well. You know?
Saved - January 16, 2026 at 9:07 PM

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

🎶🎹WhoTF is Jim Marchant? WhoTF is Patrick Byrne? WTF is Rotary? WhoTF is Ivan Raiklin? Whotf is Jeremy?🎶🥁, WhoTF is also involved with "Election Integrity"? 🍊🍊🍊🍊🫴🏻

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 4:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Is this all organic? Everyone’s watching me yet no one talks about Racine. How do I get an admin delegate for my account? Why do they follow but never discuss Racine? Can I get a CFEI paycheck or $3,000 in my TruthArchive? Can I work for Jim Marchant? How do we get our oranges?

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

Is all this ORGANIC??? Seems everybody is watching you but nobody wants to talk about RACINE? How do I get an "ADMIN DELEGATE" for my account? Why do they follow but never speak about RACINE? Can I get a CFEI paycheck? Can I get a balance of $3,000 in my TRUTHARCHIVE? Can I work for Jim Marchant? #WTFisJeremy? #WTHisRacine? @TimmyGs_312 ? @DenyTheMark2020 ?@TruCheetos ? @ImZeroDayz ? HOW DO WE GET OUR ORANGES???

Saved - December 1, 2025 at 11:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m not in a religion or getting paid, and I’m not going to let you talk down to me. NO ACTION, only ideas. I hear about a group with land and joint farming, a “READDDDYYYY” target, but crossing state lines to take down tyrants is a federal offense and probably data-mined. Stop shitting on people who want to help and start unifying numbers. This platform is a FUCKING JOKE.

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

Don't point your fucking finger at me. Don't talk to me about the 3000 years. I'm the ONLY one here who is NOT in a religion and NOT getting paid. You and A/G and 750 hard core followers going to go out with your $750 scopes and take down the 13 Bloodlines. Great! God Be With You. Don't talk down to me. NONE OF YOU have produced ACTION. Ideas? Yes. BUT NO ACTION. You got some guy who says he has 100's of acres and people are building and setting up homes and joint farming and what would actually be a nice scenario for grouping up and being "READDDDYYYY". That is TARGET NUMBER ONE. As if the Government doesn't know what it is doing. This shit you talk about "resisting" ALREADY HAPPENED IN THE 70'S AND 80'S AND 90'S under Janet Reno. Northern Idaho was brought to heel FFS. So don't talk down to me like you are going to stop 13 bloodlines that have gamed this out since the 1300's. Don't FUCKING refer to me as "you people". Like your some kind of Thespian version Rambo. I have been BALLZ DEEP by your sides since @utism and all 3 documentaries dropped. All I see now is DIVISION and a handful of you that are going to get a bunch of us killed. Not going to say who, but POSTING about crossing state lines with a group of hard cores taking down TYRANTS...IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE AND HAS PROBABLY already been data mined. Stop shitting on people who want to help and start unifying numbers. This platform is a FUCKING JOKE!

Saved - November 12, 2025 at 2:14 AM

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

@DineshDSouza Hey @DineshDSouza ! Yeah you Fluffer. 👇🏻🚨🫡 https://t.co/sNVBR01mjf

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

Dinesh, tell everyone about Rotary, Racine, WI, CNP and how J6 is closely related to Act 10. https://t.co/tDTHJSsoAh

@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza

This needs to be a top priority, but it doesn’t seem to be with Pam Bondi. Bondi seems to do as little as necessary to keep Trump off her back. The list of malefactors is long, but the list of indictments to date is very short. https://t.co/ntdZ2591SI

Saved - November 10, 2025 at 2:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
DSPetolicchio argues certain figures won’t condemn demonic statements and accuses “the woke right” of evil and lying for fame and wealth. JustTheHound counters that the First Amendment applies to him, and the Second to those who attack the First. Krypt707 replies with an antisemitic insult and a link, and KettyLuvz responds with another link.

@DSPetolicchio - David Petolicchio

You can post hours of Nick Fuentes saying absolutely demonic things and the woke right won't condemn it. These people are evil and are not above lying, incessantly, in order to gain fame and wealth.

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

@DSPetolicchio 1st amendment applies to him. 2nd amendment applies to those who shit on the first amendment.

@Krypt707 - AK

@JustTheHound @DSPetolicchio This Jew not only shits on the second amendment but also those who are exercise it https://t.co/wkdwF0bPv3

@KettyLuvz - KettyLove

@Krypt707 @JustTheHound @DSPetolicchio https://t.co/fA0jyxn80s

@AlexGnarcia - A/G

trashfagism I'll call it https://t.co/OhxPHR0dJD

@AlexGnarcia - A/G

@DSPetolicchio The bolsheviks? Nice.

Saved - November 9, 2025 at 12:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread discusses a clash between Glenn Beck and Tim Ballard, with links implying controversy. The participants imply many involved figures—Church leadership, the Trump administration, fundraisers, investors, presidents—may have been duped, suggesting Ballard (TB) is now toxic in his circle. Observers note Kash Patel’s jittery eyes as a detail. The exchange includes reactions and further references among TruCheetos, Warrllion, JustTheHound, and Meowllian.

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

Weird... https://t.co/EsyqtpQWJn

@SteveBakerUSA - Steve Baker

@TheLastRefuge2 Nice try. Stupid. Ignorant. Glenn doesn’t own the Blaze. Start there. But make up all the conspiracy theories you think will get you views and clicks. Free country.

@Warrllion - WarrLion

@TruCheetos Glenn Beck > Tim Ballard https://t.co/XFl5aibC1k

@TruCheetos - troof_BOOM

@Warrllion https://t.co/GOrLhZszlJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I know a little about human trafficking. The human trafficking portfolio fell underneath me in the counterterrorism shop where I was ahead. I worked with Tim Ballard at the White House to stamp out human and child sex trafficking. He was doing incredible work back then. Speaker 1: I'm the bad guy in the story. Last week, I got a call from some of the accusers, and what they're accusing him of is really not just—they're just really bad stuff. Really, really bad things. At first, because I've been friends with Tim for so long, I thought, that's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. Blew by them. Ridiculous. Until they persisted, and I started hearing more. I just heard somebody had filed in the HR complaints or something. Like, that's not possible. Well, the more the complaints come out, the worse it gets. These women called last week, and they wanted to do a show with me. That's not something I've even offered Tim. And I don't want to be the one making the calls on this. I'm not a journalist, and I'm also involved. Tim has been a friend of mine. OUR is a great organization, but I also stand up for victims. And I don't feel remaining silent on this or neutral if I know is acceptable. I don't know what they've done, but I've passed the women's number onto Leon Wolf, our news director, and said, put a journalist on this if you want. And I told him at the time, take it where it leads. I just want the truth. I just want the truth. So he put our best investigative reporter on it, and I heard last night that they are close to finishing the story. I was hoping that it was gonna be released today because this is yeah. If if if if it's true, I can't believe how many of us were duped. Speaker 2: Got pearlized. But it's still some guy who got fried and cried by the side. We gonna steal, slide, slide, slide until they all die. These niggas ain't seeing me because these niggas be small fry. I got big dude status, k l
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, yes, I do know a little something about human trafficking. The human trafficking portfolio fell underneath me in the counterterrorism shop where I was ahead. And I worked with Tim Ballard at the White House to stamp out human and child sex trafficking. He was doing incredible work back then. Speaker 1: I'm the bad guy in the story. I'm the bad guy in the story. Last week, I got a call from some of the accusers, and what they're accusing him of is really not not just they're just really bad stuff. Really, really bad things. And at first, because I've been friends with Tim for so long, I thought, that's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. Blew by them. Ridiculous. Until they persisted, and and I started hearing more. I just heard somebody had filed in the in at OUR HR complaints or something. Like, that's not possible. Well, the more the complaints come out, the worse it gets. These women called last week, and they wanted to do a show with me. That's not something I've even offered Tim. And I don't want to be the one making the calls on this. I'm not a journalist, and I'm also involved. Tim has been a friend of mine. OUR is a is a great organization, but I also stand up for victims. And I don't feel remaining silent on this or neutral if I know is acceptable. I don't know, what they've done, but I've passed the women's number onto Leon Wolf, our news director, and said, put a journalist on this if you want. And I told him at the time, take it where it leads. I just want the truth. I just want the truth. So he put our best investigative reporter on it, and, I heard last night that they are close to finishing the story. I was hoping that it was gonna be released today because this is yeah. If if if if if it's true, I can't believe how many of us were duped. Speaker 2: Got pearlized. But it's still some guy who got fried and cried by the side. We gonna steal, slide, slide, slide until they all die. These niggas ain't seeing me because these niggas be small fry. I got big dude status, k l

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

@TruCheetos @Warrllion 👀 @Meowllian

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

I really do wonder though, how many of these people involved, including the Church leadership, Trump Admin, fundraisers, investors, Presidents etc etc were really “duped.” TB is now kryptonite to anyone in his orbit. Also did you notice Kash Patels eye balls? They’re jittery again.

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

@Meowllian @TruCheetos @Warrllion https://t.co/Cw9yKyQosH

Saved - November 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Candace Owens promotes a trend as worldwide number one. Brick_Suit rebukes, claiming she weaponized Charlie Kirk’s death and rode baseless theories to the top. LoudAdviceWith1 shares a link. Brick_Suit adds a claim of a $7k instant block. JustTheHound points to a remark by DecentFiJC and shares another link.

@RealCandaceO - Candace Owens

Favorite trend ever. NUMBER ONE WORLDWIDE 🔥🔥 https://t.co/36Di9B10m4

@Brick_Suit - Brick Suit

@RealCandaceO So happy for you that you could weaponize Charlie Kirk's assassination and ride absurd theories about his death to number one!

@loudadvicewith1 - America_First_and_only

@Brick_Suit @RealCandaceO https://t.co/DFU1BEPGME

@Brick_Suit - Brick Suit

@loudadvicewith1 @RealCandaceO $7k instablock

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

@Brick_Suit @loudadvicewith1 @RealCandaceO Look at what that @DecentFiJC said 👇🏻 https://t.co/lB6wV6sQwT

Saved - October 31, 2025 at 3:02 PM

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

That is strange you said that Ketty. https://t.co/sRrmRHcPfj

@KettyLuvz - KettyLove

@JustTheHound What a psycho 👹

Saved - October 30, 2025 at 7:02 PM

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

@Warrllion @psyop4921 @Krypt707 @Stacylynne91 Don't leave anybody out now. Thank you X. 🫡🎶🎶 https://t.co/1hFjqCfqCx

Saved - October 30, 2025 at 7:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Warrllion initiates action intel on SloanRachmuth, noting receipts shared with FBIDirectorKash. JustTheHound mentions Project Lotus X. Kash prompts a public discussion on discarding the Constitution, urging a direct statement. Warrllion adds another link for SloanRachmuth and points out the Foreign Emoluments Clause is in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8, with a link.

@Warrllion - WarrLion

Action intel on @SloanRachmuth @FBIDirectorKash we have all the reciepts. https://t.co/QbjOpAWmDd

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

@OnkelWolff @Stacylynne91 @VishBurra @SloanRachmuth @FBIDirectorKash What? She is very pretty. I want her to defend herself against the counter threats from her initial threats on Americans by using these receipts to properly TRY to defend herself and justify her threats. Once @FBIDirectorKash sees the receipts he will do what he does BEST. https://t.co/VInenudM9Q

@JustTheHound - Just IGNORE The Hound

@Warrllion @SloanRachmuth @FBIDirectorKash Project Lotus X @FBIDirectorKash are you ready to have the discussion with the American people that we NO LONGER have an American Constitution? Just stand up and tell them. They will understand. There is no need for Americans to behave otherwise. Tell them already. https://t.co/276KuSLKa0

@Warrllion - WarrLion

@JustTheHound @SloanRachmuth @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDirectorKash 🫡 Here's another one for @SloanRachmuth aside from http://Efile.fara.gov The Foreign Emoluments Clause is found in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution. https://t.co/MxGowFSNyW

@Warrllion - WarrLion

The Foreign Emoluments Clause https://t.co/NGlOmy0bje

Saved - September 28, 2025 at 2:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a claim of H1B fraud at Hidden Ridge Apartments, linking it to Verizon and the Wallenberg brothers, Jacob and Marcus, who are accused of being involved in 9/11. Another participant elaborates on the Wallenbergs' influence, noting their control over numerous conglomerates and their role in hosting the Bilderberg Meetings. They also mention the Wallenbergs' control over fiber optics patents and connections to various military and intelligence operations. The discussion includes a brief exchange about capturing attention within the conversation.

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

H1B FRAUD AT HIDDEN RIDGE APTS? Oh, you mean VERIZON? That’s Jacob & Marcus Wallenberg, two 9/11 accomplices from INVESTOR AB, ERICSSON, ALIBABA and EQT. They even put PayPal President & CEO Dan Schulman on Verizon’s Board. Jacob is on the Atlantic Council Int’l Advisory Board.

@mangolassi93 - newyorker093

@VBierschwale @KumarXclusive @EngineerChiefCE @USTechWorkers @vee14102 @AtlasGemini @realmattforney @USCIS @USDOL @CivilRights @ICEgov @StateDept @AAGDhillon @SecRubio @StephenM Hidden Ridge Apts in Irving TX is listed as a work location for many H1B roles. Please investigate

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Wallenberg || Power in the shadows Esse Non Vederi - Act but not be seen 🔲 Wallenbergs have control over 20 conglomerates; a few include: Atlas Copco, ABB, SEB, AstraZeneca, Wärtsilä, Sobi, Saab, Ericsson, Investor AB, and Epiroc. 🔲Jacob & Marcus Wallenberg hosted and co-chaired the most recent Bilderberg Meetings in Stockholm in June 2025. 🔲Wallenberg controls the patent for fiber optics with a built in backdoor, and telecomm for intelligence/ military and police in 187 countries. Including calling 911, Cybertip hotline, and Amber Alert (NCMEC) See: Ericsson Neustar Scandal 🔲Investor AB controls BAE SYSTEMS. Jacob Wallenberg controls investor AB. The Wallenbergs also control Ericsson who finances ISIS/Sinaloa/CJNG, & ABB, (power grids in 150 countries). 🔲Wallenberg’s own Ericsson, and Israel’s Raphael Defense Systems Iron Dome is controlled by Ericsson engineers, as well as Halliburton, who hosts the Iron Dome network.

@moTsecretary - Mr moT Bombadils secretary 🏴‍☠️

Sweden’s unethical – and unlawful ­­– arms deals with ISIS-backing Saudis By Prof Marcello Ferrada de Noli, Chair, Swedish Doctors for Human Rights – SWEDHR. Prime Minister of Sweden Stefan Löfven, and with him the Swedish banker Marcus Wallenberg (CEO of Investor, the main holding company of the Wallenbergs), are travelling to Saudi Arabia for an official visit. The meetings with the Saudis, as announced […] Prime Minister of Sweden Stefan Löfven, and with him the Swedish banker Marcus Wallenberg (CEO of Investor, the main holding company of the Wallenbergs), are travelling to Saudi Arabia for an official visit. The meetings with the Saudis, as announced by the Swedish Radio, shall aim to “increase the exchange” between the two countries. Wallenberg’s Investor owns Saab Group, the main Swedish defence and aerospace company manufacturing a variety of weapons. At the same time, the Chairman of the Defense Committee in the Swedish Parliament, Mr Allan Widman, is now demanding that Sweden should send arms to US-backed Pershmerga, integrating the US & Saudi-led coalition in Iraq. The above-mentioned issues are not only connected in their timing, but are also produced against the backdrop of the US and Saudi instigated Syria war aimed to depose the legitimate government of Assad, and the confrontation pursued by NATO and its political front EU against Russia. Accusations put forward in the US, among other by Senator Richard Black, indicate that Saudi Arabia has been financing/arming ISIS jihadists. The Senator revealed also that “Saudi Arabia and Turkey formed the Army of Conquer and coordinated ISIS and Al-Qaida”. To the best of my knowledge the Senator has not been refuted on these allegations. Further, emails published by WikiLeaks’ Podesta series revealed that Hillary Clinton has been fully aware – already since 2014 – of the fact that both Saudi Arabia and Qatar were financing ISIS. [3] On the other hand, the US government has claimed the responsibility for financing, training and arming so-called “moderate rebels” – the “moderate terrorists” – which together with ISIS maintain a common war against the government of Syria. Although widespread reports found in the internet, Saudi Arabia has denied such a connections with ISIS, and eventually it has formed an own anti-ISIL coalition declared to fight terrorism. However, this is the testimony of the US Secretary of State in August 2014: The human rights impact of the above has meant a tragedy of huge proportions for the Syrian population in the occupied territories. This occupation has been conducted by a variety of foreign troops, i.e. ISIS forces financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, “moderate terrorists”, US military ‘advisors” or Turkish-trained forces. One example of these human rights atrocities committed by the coalition-supported rebels was the shutting off water supply in (West) Aleppo to over a million civilian residents in that area. As voices of protest in the US against the arming of the abo📷ve mentioned “rebels” has increased (to the point that they were halted during a brief period) the US government expects that its client states in the EU will replace US in shipping supplies to the “rebels”. The utilization of Sweden in this regard is convenient in two ways: Despite the subservient stance towards NATO in particular during the past Carl Bildt era, the Swedish authorities play still the “non-alignment” card, giving hence the impression of a “neutral country”; and on the other hand, Sweden has a history of secret deals regarding weapons-export with the Saudis. The law in Sweden forbids the export of weapons to parties/zones in on-going military conflict. However, the Swedish authorities, the military and the weapons-export complex ‘led’ ultimately by magnate Jacob Wallenberg have already breached the Swedish law in those regards. Apart of the explicit prohibition to provide weapons to factions in actual conflict, it should be noted that under the Swedish law all kind of arms shipments for export purposes have to be controlled by (the ‘independent’) Swedish Agency for Non-Proliferation and Export Controls (ISP). This was not the case of “Project Simoom”, when Sweden’s Defence Research Agency (FOI), an authority under the Ministry of Defence, initiated a secret arms deals with the Saudis already in 2007 and later through an up-front firm aimed to cover the operation. This secret arms deal between Sweden and the Saudis has also been exposed by the organization WikiLeaks. This occasioned the Swedish military react preposterously against the WikiLeaks founder, accusing Mr Assange and WikiLeaks on Swedish TV of “blackmailing Sweden”. The secret arms deal was about the Swedes constructing a weapon factory in Saudi Arabia. The armaments would consist of “weapons of point”, which is also the type of weaponry used by ISIS forces against Syrian army’s armoured vehicles. As these vehicles are of Russian fabrication, also gives NATO-prone Sweden an opportunity to test in combat their weaponry technique. When the deal was exposed, the Swedish prosecutors had to initiate an investigation, for as I pointed above, it was law-against. However, the prosecutors rapidly closed the investigation and in spite of the evidence the case was shutdown because “there was no reason to prosecute“.  Meanwhile, the phony, no-evidence case against the WikiLeaks founder Mr Julian Assange was tightened even more by the Swedish prosecutors; meaning, they ostracised the case to a complete abandonment for years. By the time of the exposures, Jacob Wallenberg, who among a variety of other companies was a director of Saab’s and Ericsson’s board, wrote to the Swedish defence minister that “his ‘Saudi friends’ in the business world were not happy, and that the decision to stop work on the factory ‘threatened important business interests’.”  According to The Local, these interests particularly consisted in acquisitions by Saudis of the Swedish system Erieye, an airborne surveillance technique produced by Saab Electronic Defense Systems, formerly Ericsson Microwave Systems. As a result of these pressures exercised by the arms-deal magnate Wallenberg on behalf of the Saudis, and his own financial interests, the deal continued. Sweden then disregarded the atrocities committed by Saudis for instance in Yemen, and the basic violation to the human rights, women rights, and civil rights in Saudi Arabia. It took three years after the above-mentioned incident for the Swedish government to finally cancel the commercial agreement with Saudi Arabia. In this cancellation, the foreign minister Margot Wallström had a central role. When this was announced on March 2015, Jacob Wallenberg initiated a secret campaign among the most prominent figures of the financial and industrial complex of Sweden to try to stop that cancellation. In a confidential email, which was later exposed in the Swedish media, Jacob Wallenberg requests his top of the Swedish industry peers to sign an appeal opposing the cancellation of the Saudi deal, appeal that was later published in the main Swedish paper Dagens Nyheter. A facsimile of Wallenberg’s email in the image below. Further, and less than two weeks after Margot Wallström’s announcement on Saudi Arabia, PM Stefan Löfven invited Jacob Wallenberg and a few other prominent finance tops to a copious dinner at the government residence Sagerska huset on the 15 of March this year. Another magnate assisting at the dinner, Carl Bennet, said to Aftonbladet that “the government wished to be informed about the situation in Saudi Arabia, and what our appraisal is on that situation”. Carl Bennet was also a cosignatory of the appeal published in DN. Now the arms magnate Wallenberg and the Swedish PM Löfven are sitting in a Swedish governmental plane heading to Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile the human rights tragedy among the civilian populations targeted by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen or, to rephrase, its participation in the US-led coalition in Syria continues mortally and unabated. I wonder what the human-rights principled FM Margot Wallström thinks about all this.

@C_Quigley00 - Carroll Quigley

@GStrand45 https://theindicter.com/swedens-unethical-and-unlawful-arms-deals-with-isis-backing-saudis/

Sweden’s unethical – and unlawful ­­– arms deals with ISIS-backing Saudis – The Indicter theindicter.com

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound 🇳🇴🇩🇰🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇺🇸

@Meowllian @StaceyLynne_0 @threadreaderapp unroll FFS https://t.co/MnUz7kEBzF

@KettyLuvz - KettyLove

@JustTheHound @Meowllian @StaceyLynne_0 @threadreaderapp @JustTheHound Are you trying to capture both J and Meow?

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound 🇳🇴🇩🇰🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇺🇸

@KettyLuvz @Meowllian @StaceyLynne_0 @threadreaderapp yes... https://t.co/AHPgOSUF8K

Saved - July 6, 2025 at 10:05 PM

@JustTheHound - Just The Hound

https://t.co/tS7YFt0P7x

@DavidSmuts - David Smuts

I keep telling y'all they're planning to destroy America and y'all ignore me. Here's one of them with a pic of a destroyed NYC in her profile. Believe what they say & show you! #FatimaSecrets ⬇️ https://t.co/gIKkSaBc6S

View Full Interactive Feed