TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @LucyRae509
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
Newly released January 6 CCTV shows three minutes of undercover Detectives Leiva and Callahan on the Upper West Terrace of the Capitol, including the moment Ashli Babbitt walked right past them, and their meeting with Proud Boys. https://t.co/5NETwjtBtA
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
A recently disclosed MPD internal investigation revealed that Detective Ricardo Leiva observed people breaking glass windows at the Capitol, and ran up to them saying, “hey what’s up man, you’re doing an amazing job, awesome awesome awesome.” Leiva claims he recorded this, but the recording has not been produced in discovery.
@GTP_Podcast - GameTechPolitics
I finally feel a victory on this story that I’ve been investigating for nearly 3 years now. @LauraLoomer Thank you for your help. https://t.co/B6RwTb9KDW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter Biden's involvement in financing biological laboratories in Ukraine has been confirmed by independent cybersecurity experts. Russian officials claim that these labs were producing biochemical weapons at the request of the Biden crime syndicate. They have called on Joe Biden to explain his son's connection to these labs. Hunter's firm, Rosemont Seneca, invested $500,000 in a San Francisco pathogen research company, Metabayara, which was working in Ukraine. Metabayara is a subcontractor for the Department of Defense's engineering firm, Black and Veatch. Government funding records show that the Department of Defense awarded $370,000 to Bio Labs in Ukraine for COVID-19 research in November 2019, three months before the virus was officially named by the WHO. This raises questions about the early funding of coronavirus research and the existence of these labs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's right. In all the tens of thousands of emails from Hunter Biden's disgusting laptop, it's been confirmed by independent cybersecurity experts that Joe Biden's son was actually financing biological laboratories in Ukraine. Russian officials claimed the labs were producing biochemical weapons at the request of the Biden crime syndicate, and Moscow warned that Biden needs to explain his son's involvement with the labs.
Speaker 1: We can confirm that the Kyiv regime is engaged in military biological programs financed by the United States of America. It's impossible these programs were used to benefit science and peace because they were financed by the US Department of Defense. The Pentagon and Joe Biden must officially explain to the global community about the programs in Ukraine.
Speaker 0: And as it turns out, the Russians were right. Hunter's firm, Rosemont Seneca, actually did invest half $1,000,000 and then San Francisco pathogen research company, Metabayara, working in Ukraine on top of 1,000,000 in additional funding Hunter secured through other firms like Goldman Sachs. Now Meta Baiada is a subcontractor for the Department of Defense's engineering firm, Black and Veatch. Remember that name. This is where it gets really interesting because according to official documents uncovered by investigators at the expose, government funding records show the Department of Defense awarded $370,000 to Bio Labs in Ukraine for COVID nineteen research in November of 2019.
For anyone keeping track, that's 3 months before the WHO officially even named the Chinese virus COVID nineteen. You can see it for yourself. It's highlighted right there. November 12, 2019 SME manuscript documentation and COVID nineteen research. The US and Hunter Biden specifically were apparently helping to fund research into the coronavirus before it officially existed at the same labs that the State Department also insisted didn't exist.
@GTP_Podcast - GameTechPolitics
The Sinister Hunter Biden 'Pandemic' Investment The Media Isn't Talking About - Loomered
Hunter Biden's Laptop scandal and his emails reveal that Joe Biden's son has been profiting off of global pandemics, including COVID-19 since Joe Biden was Vice President under Barrack Obama.
loomered.com
@JackSmart007 - Thomas Tatum
Thanks for having me on today @EmeraldRobinson #massiereport #j6 #january6th @HelpStopHate @InvestigateJ6 @CondemnedUSA @DanielGoodwyn https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vdTSnNUyau-IrxNrlajwbEZu-lJt4y3im8tMBTWCKIE/edit
Page Not Found
Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets
docs.google.com
@LucyRae509 - Ali Rae
@robertdunlap947 @RealCaptainMaga https://itnshow.com/2021/01/07/read-affidavit-delivered-to-congress-yesterday-declaring-confession-of-election-interference-by-italian-defense-contractor-employee/?fbclid=IwAR1KyPbYvMOmqdrWehAPLTj-V56oefK2JFS-RoMPy5n1C6H9wNBpUdRijyo
Read: Affidavit Delivered to Congress Yesterday Declaring Confession of Election Interference by Italian Defense Contractor Employee
A sworn affidavit was delivered to Congress yesterday detailing confessions by an employee of Italian defense contractor Leonardo SpA. The affidavit was written by the employee’s lawye…
itnshow.com
@robertdunlap947 - Bobby D🎙
Damn😳. You’re going to want to watch this video about our 2020 election👍. Each repost literally informs others of this information👊 https://t.co/ubIRazBQmW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Maria Zak from Nations in Action discusses alleged election interference in the United States. She claims that the Italian Secret Service received information from Arturo's girlfriend, who said that Arturo, her uncle, came home and expressed confusion about stealing America's election. The Italian intelligence services investigated and reached out to Nations in Action, stating that they were witnessing a coup d'etat in the US. Maria Zak plays an audio recording from Larry Johnson, a member of the CIA and State Department, discussing efforts to rescue Arturo D'Alega and bring him to the US for testimony. She calls for an investigation into these claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'll go ahead and move on to our presentation from, Maria Zak, and this is, talking about the elections. Go ahead.
Speaker 1: Good morning. I'm Maria Zak from Nations in Action, and We are an organization that's devoted to transparent government, transformative politicians, trustworthy parties And Truthful Media. The Italian Secret Service actually received information And from Arturo's girlfriend, he considers wife because they've been together so long. Her uncle is part of the Italian intelligence services. She said, uncle, Artura came home and said he doesn't understand why we're stealing America's election.
They immediately go to Leonardo and investigate. Arturo confesses. The Italian intelligence services reach out to us November 18th. They said something happened. We're watching a coup d'etat in the United States of America.
They were fearful of meeting with anyone. There were 2 affidavits that were delivered into Congress. And they were delivered from Italian citizens that contacted us. Intelligence agencies Had been trying to reach out because their country had already fallen. And that is what is happening around the world.
The intelligence agencies are watching corruption And China come in to theirs their countries and buying off politicians and hiding things and using Fraud to do amazing efforts to take over and own property and in some instances, countries. So today I'm going to play for you an audio tape that should shock you all. It'll shock America. This is the 1st place I have chosen to testify in. I could have walked into any state.
I know my way around. We've already proven my credentials. I know government affairs. I can walk in, and when I play this for you and why Kansas? Because Kansas was a pro Trump, victor of electors.
But I would argue you don't know. You do not know the real result of your election. You also probably have not been made aware of what was occurring in Italy. Leonardo, the defense contracting firm, had Some strange occurrences happening with people coming in and out that the intelligence services witnessed of people coming from Frankfurt Into the Italian U. S.
Embassy in Rome on Via Veneto. This instance enabled Individuals to come forward and supposedly, according to the Italian intelligence services, work with Leonardo to change the results Of the United States election. But more frightening is that they claimed there were 47 to 52 presidential elections around the world, And they now have telemetry experts over 200 that speak foreign languages that are all different. So what you are dealing with is a very calculated attempt To take down presidencies and control countries. So this audio that I'm about to play For you is from an individual who is a member of the CIA and the State Department.
His name is Larry Johnson. Many of you may not know, but I am the person not only who hand delivered that letter to Donald Trump on Christmas Eve on in 2020, telling him Who stole the election, where they stole it, and how they stole it. And my number one goal was to bring back one of the people who was In the satellite center, his name was Arturo D'Alega. My goal was to rescue him and bring him over to America because he was willing to testify. There were people that would not assist, that I thought would assist, but what was most shocking was this voice recording that I will play now.
Speaker 2: Maria, hi. Larry Johnson. We spoke yesterday. Listen. I needed to see if you would help us get in touch with the lawyer because if you talked to him yesterday, he went, Missing.
We have people in Italy now and are ready to have the person, that's in jail. We've got a national security team that can extradite him and bring him back safely to the United States. So that's already lined up. There's no need for an airplane because the Maria Zak?
Speaker 1: That's our United States government supposedly, national security, that are going to go rescue Arturo Delia. Anyone know about that? Probably not. Anyone? Because most Americans had this truth hidden from them, that there was an operation supposedly, But the number one thing that they were looking for in the beginning of that message was where the lawyers were and the people who did the affidavits who were being hunted to be killed.
These are brave people around the world that are trying to tell the truth and having great difficulty with the United States government apparatus. Telling the truth is not easy, and people are risking their lives. So that was the transcript. So you ask, okay, What proof is there? Well, I would definitely consider that, sir, Mr.
Chairman and members. That is called proof. That needs an investigation. Where is our law enforcement? It should be at the local, state, and federal levels immediately to investigate Larry Johnson and the activities that he did In the United States during this whole event?
You know, everyone says if you see something, say something, right? We're all supposed to see something, say something, and then what happens? You get blasted. We had patterns of illegal activity across the country. We had People not matching signatures on the ballots.
We had witnesses galore filling out affidavits. I'm so proud of the team at Nations in Action because they filed many, many, many affidavits. They saw the computers actually online and there are photographs. So if anyone says the machines weren't online, that is false. So these witnesses that have come forward have also identified over 35,000 illegal cross county voting just in Georgia alone, and that relates To president Trump's talk with secretary of state Brad Raffensperger where he was saying, I know that there are votes there that were illegally cast.
He was right. He is actually vindicated in the proof today because the cross reference with the state documents and the US Postal Service Feed shows that these people did not live where they actually voted. Those votes should have never been counted. Now we have illegal votes that are cast using fake residences and business addresses, photocopied identical ballots and stacks fed into tabulators, And many fake unfolded, unmailed absentee ballots. Of the thousands of affidavits just filed in Georgia alone, would you like to know how many arrests were made?
0. 0. All those great citizens who we ask to do us a favor and help us do our right To vote, to go and volunteer to work polls had no no assistance at all in having a free and fair election, and they witnessed the failures of America. So now you should be asking me, who are the people in Italy, Maria? Who are they that actually coordinated and conspired?
Because this is where we really break things down and show you the proof of what occurred. Stefano Serafini on your left Is actually a member of our state department who retired just days before the election. It is said that he in an intercept, it was picked up that he was Retiring so he wouldn't lose his pension should he be caught. He was coordinating with general Claudio Graziano. General Graziano is also the at the time, was the EU commander.
And they were meeting across the street at the St. Regis Hotel, And it was with Ignacio Moncada, who is the CEO of FATA, which is FATA SPA, which is a subsidiary have Leonardo, one of the largest defense contracting firms in the world. They are the largest in Italy, And they received numerous United States military and intelligence contracts. That should frighten everybody right now. No.
They were meeting in his hotel, and in March of 2020, they were coordinating this plan. The Italian intelligence services actually provided me with the cell phone number for the go order, and it goes to general Graziano. So then you ask, well, they concoct the plan. They have to go get the IT guys. Who's gonna do it?
Well, they already had a guy. His name is Charles Robinson. He is a telemetry expert. He came in a week prior To the election of November 2020. He uploaded Mil Spec software, and he had traveled from Frankfurt.
@BobbyPiton3 - Bobby Piton
@realLizUSA I went through all of the GA Fulton County data on Dec 29, 2020. I pulled an all nighter and napped for 1-2 hours waiting to testify before Georgia State Senate. If you really believe Fulton wasn't rigged, watch this clip from 12/30/2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbMXWHVwkfQ
@CoreyDigs - Corey Lynn of Corey's Digs
🚨 Part 3 of my immunity series just published! Please share this far and wide! Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework Part 3 – World Economic Forum Protected https://www.coreysdigs.com/global/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-3-world-economic-forum-protected/
Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework Part 3 – World Economic Forum Protected - coreysdigs.com
The World Economic Forum is protected by immunities and privileges, just as the UN, OAS, GAVI, BIS, Central Banks, and dozens of other orgs.
coreysdigs.com
@CoreyDigs - Corey Lynn of Corey's Digs
Please share this series far & wide. It's CRITICAL info the world needs to know about. I've been screaming from the rooftops for over a year. Part 2 Published March 9, 2023 Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework Part 2 - A Powerhouse of Ruin https://www.coreysdigs.com/global/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-2-a-powerhouse-of-ruin/
Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework Part 2 - A Powerhouse of Ruin - coreysdigs.com
MUST READ: Hundreds of organizations and banks operate outside the system with immunities and privileges that give them power over humanity.
coreysdigs.com
@CoreyDigs - Corey Lynn of Corey's Digs
Please share this series far and wide. It is CRITICAL information the world needs to know about. I've been screaming from the rooftops for over a year. Part 1 Published Sept. 29, 2022 Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework - Part 1 https://www.coreysdigs.com/u-s/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-1/
Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework - Part 1 - coreysdigs.com
CRITICAL report on major organizations and banks laundering with immunity and privileges to create the control framework over people of this world.
coreysdigs.com
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
"There were a lot of things we noticed that were not organic. The bubbles being filled in absolutely perfect. It was obviously not done by a human hand - as though they were printed. A human being did not do that." (To do this requires proprietary AZ ballot software access.)
@MrKazzzzy - Mr Kaz
Here's a video I put together a couple years ago that takes a deep dive into the TCF Center during the 2020 election cycle. I spent a couple of weeks reviewing testimony and videos to organize this video. https://t.co/3QMxqotVjT
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the video, various speakers discuss their experiences at the TCF Center during the election. They mention issues such as lack of training, intimidation, and improper handling of ballots. Some speakers claim to have witnessed ballots being counted multiple times, while others mention the absence of Republican poll workers. There are also allegations of fraudulent activity, including the arrival of boxes of ballots in unsealed vans. The speakers express concerns about the lack of chain of custody verification and the potential impact on the integrity of the election process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now that's Why did they put the cardboard up on the windows?
Speaker 1: Like, because they're spec. Oh,
Speaker 0: okay. It was just something they they they they screwed up on. I mean, they just it was on. The emotion in that set TCF center was so high, it was caused by both sides. It that It wasn't just Okay.
Related to I'm sorry. Related to who? They training.
Speaker 2: Training. Lack of training.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I could see that.
Speaker 3: I don't know what
Speaker 0: I think people were going there looking for a place. That
Speaker 4: Coworkers are showed up, eager to work, all have been trained, and they did as they were trained to do.
Speaker 1: That that Your chairperson can issue him what type of ballot?
Speaker 0: A provisional.
Speaker 1: A provisional envelope. Why? That Where is it going?
Speaker 0: Not in the tabulator.
Speaker 1: Not in the tabulator. It's going in the envelope. Right? That He we have how many days? 6.
So what is the Department of Elections gonna do with it?
Speaker 0: That Alright. What I hope Destroy. That
Speaker 1: Challengers and Polar Watchers. That They have to wear a mask and they have to stay 6 feet. That's important because they can come behind your table. That But if you don't have 6 feet, they can't come back there. Any questions?
So the 6 feet back was a really
Speaker 0: good vision. Thick neck, please. Exactly. Okay. Yes.
They got
Speaker 1: really good vision. They're that They got really good pictures. They were not yours. 6 feet. That's the rule.
Right? That And you are entitled to your 6 feet. Is that common? We can we expect that in. Yep.
There is a common. That They come. I don't know if they're coming to every precinct, but they're coming to many of them in the city. Yes. We have already gotten word.
The state has already said that And the basic thing that's going to challenge is what? Adaptive. That That
Speaker 0: is correct.
Speaker 5: Anytime as a challenger, I tried to look at the ballot that And then try to verify it, I would get 2 or 3 of the poll workers literally screaming at me to get back 6 feet.
Speaker 6: That We were never told that the person that was inspecting the ballot, their job was to stand in front of the Republican poll challenger, but consistently, that's what that We saw. Whenever we would try to watch the process, the person that was inspecting the ballot would stand in front of us. And if we tried to move to the side, One of the agitators that were, at the TCF center, and there were lots of agitators that were there working on behalf, that in my opinion of the Democrat Party, they would challenge us and tell us to stand back, that we were too close, that we We were going to kill people with COVID. So that's what we encountered, and we were not allowed to get up close to the ballots. It just was prohibited.
It wasn't allowed.
Speaker 7: I was called names whenever my mask fell down even below a little below my nose. I'd be called names. I'd say I was killing people, stuff like that while they'd be talking to somebody not wearing a mask. People at the polling centers weren't wearing masks, the people who were doing the duplicating.
Speaker 0: That challenging as they start yelling and kinda making a scene. 911.
Speaker 1: They got they got standards. They got conduct standards.
Speaker 8: Okay. That
Speaker 1: Make a scene. Give him a bite of it. I'll probably serve.
Speaker 8: When I first arrived, this was interesting as well. I was wearing a mask. That And I was fidgeting with it because it was itchy. There was a gentleman who was a table supervisor. Again, he had the emblem on that his breast.
And he basically called me a bio terrorist, basically said I was killing people. We're in the middle of a pandemic and he was going to kick me out if I continue to itch my face because I was wearing an itchy mask. That I knew to itch my face because I was wearing an itchy mask. And I kept on trying to ask him, does everybody have to have this standard of wearing a mask? Because I saw numerous workers not wearing masks properly.
Because I saw numerous workers not wearing masks properly. Eventually, as he called me an agitator, I pointed to a gentleman. I said, does he have that wear his mask. And he didn't respond to me. And I wanted to stay in there because he told me he was going to arrest me because he identified himself as a that Wayne County, working for the Wayne County Sheriff's Department.
Speaker 9: Thank you.
Speaker 10: It's important to know that I end up in assault and battery with a worker there. That
Speaker 5: At no time were we able actually to physically see the ballot and then see it in the, the poll electronic book. That The person opening the ballot would probably be sitting where senator Theiss is, and the electronic screen that we were that supposed to be watching is basically to where the committee clerk is. Now I don't know if you guys got binocular vision, but that I don't. So I cannot look at a ballot over here, run down to this screen, and be able to see it and verify that it is the same. I did address they with them multiple times and they told me, sorry, I should have planned better.
Speaker 6: At one point, when the military ballots came in, we were told to take a break, that it was a good time to take a break. I'd been there for 6 hours. I worked for a total of 13 hours that day, and the only time I sat down because Republican poll workers had to go upstairs to another room that to get lunch or to sit on a chair. Democrats and the agitators all had a corner where food was brought into them. They were served food.
They didn't have to leave. When it was time to go to lunch, we had to leave because we didn't have food provided. We had to go to another room. When we got back, the doors were locked. I was able to get back into the room.
Speaker 11: I also witnessed, several of the poll workers yelling, Cussing, all kinds of nasty things. And a lot of the poll challengers, including myself.
Speaker 3: That Several of us challengers watched quietly for over a long, long time for the military ballots. That one point, several police officers came in and stood between us and the ballots little over to the side. But, that a man came up and said we were to disperse. I said we were being respectful and standing more than 6 feet way that Away, he said, it has nothing to do with COVID. You are interfering with the process.
That. We were standing quietly doing nothing, but we spread out in the aisles like the little sheep. That Quincy, of course, from there. There seemed to be a concerted effort To, let us know that we were not welcome, very unfriendly and at times hostile. At one point, that I witnessed a challenger walk up to a a lady to look at the ballot.
That She turned aggressively brandishing a long metal letter opener to the gentleman. And in a threatening manner, pointed the sharp object towards his that And demanded that he move back, move back. He backed up and she took a step forward towards him, still pointing the sharp object at his that And repeating back up, she said it at least 4 times. Another time I was standing more than 6 that feet away from accounting board table when a man forcefully demanded get back. COVID, COVID, get back.
It was impossible for that Just to see what he and anyone else was doing at the table. Clearly, that was his goal.
Speaker 0: You stayed on till in the morning hours?
Speaker 12: I stayed in until I was kicked out. I was not I they said, you know, you can leave the room for a snack. I left the room for a snack, and immediately, they closed it down.
Speaker 0: What time was that?
Speaker 12: Around 2 PM. Okay.
Speaker 13: The thing that bothered me was that when every time a GOP challenger was being escorted out, all the poll workers, Democrats and everybody else, that were cheering, and that was very disappointing because these people were just doing their job. They were not attacking. They were not there with guns. They were just volunteering their time, and they were that Treated with utmost disrespect. There was a group of people, who were like agitators, who were trying to get GOP people in trouble, and, from my skin color, everybody assumes that I'm a democrat.
And, so they just kind of come to me, that And, one of the ladies was singing that let's get let's get these MFs out. And I'm like, MFs who? Like, because, she I thought I was a democrat. Then when I pulled out my tag, she looked at me and she's like, you're on the wrong side. I'm like, how can you say I'm on the that side.
I pick whoever I want. Right? Because this is a free country. But, then I noticed that they were going and getting all the white that Male Republicans out by, you know, just kinda sheer intimidation, you know, just saying, oh, your mask slipped. You're gonna get people killed like you heard from so many other people.
And, then what I did was I got trained by 2, both the that integration integrity fund. So I went to Tim Griffin of election integrity fund, and I said, can I have my nonpartisan, credentials? And then when I that.
Speaker 0: Audience Member: I brought that
Speaker 13: badge on, everything changed. Like people just looked at me differently. I was looked at with a lot of hostility when I had the GOP tag, and now that I have a that partisan tag. I was respected at the counting boards. I was respected by the Democrats in the ACLU.
Speaker 14: I was a Republican certified poll challenger at the TCF center that From November 4th to November 5th, I was one of the victims of harassment, discrimination and intimidation by election workers while I was fulfilling that My duty as a challenger. What the witness has shared are no conspiracy theories. Several times, election workers tried to remove me from the wrong with the that False accusations that I was impeding their process. They were the ones who blocked me from seeing the ballot and when allowed workers will complain. And Election worker was brought up to harass me with the base of being too close.
However, among themselves, they didn't social distance. That I explained to him that I was only following the chairperson direction in and out. Somehow, we got to the point that English was not my first language that And he implied that then I shouldn't be there. I told him that he was discriminating and that he was treating me like garbage. That He went away.
Later, port workers whispered to each other and brought police officers to remove me. It was pretty intimidating having officers Approaching me when I had not done anything wrong. I understood they were trying to do their job. I noticed an officer was Hispanic And I talked to him in Spanish. They were being that they were being lied.
The officer started backing up. I witnessed many Republicans being kicked that out of the room and it was scary. That is not the America I came to a few decades ago. They were marked, that Kicked out and not replaced even though they were Republicans outside to be allowed to enter. It didn't happen.
That With these
Speaker 7: manual ballots, after we watched duplication process go on, they brought more ballots over, and We watched them scan the ballots and put in the date 1/1/1900. I was actually with the democratic challenger too. We were both confused on why this was that happening. So we decided to call over a supervisor who the only response we got was, oh, that's the default date that we put. I was I didn't ask any other questions neither that he I was didn't ask any questions and the fear that I'd be kicked out as I just witnessed 4 other republicans slash independents get kicked out.
And it was that Interesting because in the guide or in the handbook, it does say that no propaganda is allowed inside of the polling center. And I did see Black Lives Matter masks. And, again, I feel that There's nothing wrong with that. But I feel like that's a double standard. I feel that it's wrong that people can have that and it's okay.
Speaker 15: As you've already heard from many people who've had that my positions. There was a lot of intimidation and hostility, vented toward the Republican challengers. I experienced a lot of that as well. Right away, of that Of course, we know rules were broken because there were very, very few. I count less than 5 when there was the hand raise, Republican poll workers that in the room.
There's supposed to be 1 at every counting table, at least, and there wasn't. By midday on Wednesday, there were no more that Republicans allowed into the room. There was a lot of intimidation around those who were in the room, particularly the men and the lawyers, and they were hauled out, that Forcibly by the police for really no good reason, while the whole room of, of workers cheered. That This is intimidating. They stood and they cheered repeatedly as Republicans were hauled out for doing their job.
This is wrong. That I personally was the victim of 2 different accounts of intimidation, 1 by workers, supervisors included, and 1 by Republican, that poll challengers or watchers. In both cases, I had, raised my hand to challenge a ballot. In one case, the ballot was being duplicated. I was that prevented from watching because only 2 workers were doing it, and they were shoulder to shoulder.
I'd moved into about 3 feet or so behind them so I could look that over the shoulders. The supervisor came over and told me I had to get out of there, at least 6 feet away. I told her that I by the rules, election rules, I could move in during the time that I was watching the ballot that Well,
Speaker 12: it was being duplicated.
Speaker 15: She was yelling at me. And a second that ballot ended up being, duplicated in error. We got a high enough supervisor to stop that. The 2nd time I was surrounded by, Republican or I'm sorry, Democrat, that challengers who, again, were yelling at me, calling me a racist, telling me my mother didn't love me, all kinds of, you know, stupid but meant to intimidate things. That This is wrong.
We all deserve a fair ability to vote our conscience and to participate in the election process. That This did not happen at TFC and it needs to be audited. And we're counting on you to do it.
Speaker 16: The complete hate, disdain, and apathy for Republican poll challengers that is but one way of how elections are stolen in Michigan. Before COVID nineteen, and I'm talking to the Democrat in the House, that And in every election in the last 25 years, Republican poll challengers were removed by the police, especially in Pontiac. That MCL 168.733 says, the election inspectors that and other election officials on duty shall protect a challenger in the discharge of his or her duties. Shall protect is not an option. That shall protect.
It is never done in the urban areas. Never never never in the urban areas. In the that 34 years I've been working for the, the the state of Michigan, and certainly not the 29 years I've been working at the secretary of state. That It also says in subsection 4, a person shall not threaten or intimidate a challenger while performing an activity allowed. That You shall not threaten or intimidate.
It is a misdemeanor for what they have done, these, these inspectors, to continue to intimidate that And throw out Republican poll challengers. It has been going on too long.
Speaker 1: 60 fat was a really good vision. Thick neck. See?
Speaker 17: They that 911.
Speaker 1: They make the scene. Give them a bite of it. I'll probably
Speaker 0: that that
Speaker 1: that How do you challenge a ballot? You take the ballot, you write in the under the barcode that 2003. And you cover it with what kind of tape?
Speaker 0: Post it.
Speaker 1: Post it. The post it tape. That But this time, you're gonna put it in a secrecy sleeve and mister Stark is gonna go both abnormal. That So this ballot is going through what? The tabulator.
Speaker 0: That that
Speaker 18: I observed that envelopes which were scanned in, in some cases, would have a different ballot number than was on the envelope. I was at Board 55 in TCF. The ballot number though was in the poll book as was the number on the envelope. The situation resulted in a challenged ballot. That the situation should result in a provisional ballot because there's no no one knows who voted for anything.
That I was would like
Speaker 9: to know about the ballot that you said you saw that was blank. Mhmm. Do you know what the disposition
Speaker 19: that Of that became?
Speaker 0: What do
Speaker 8: you mean the disposition of that?
Speaker 9: What happened to it?
Speaker 8: It was put in the folder to be tabulated, And it was ran through the tabulator from what my table supervisor told me.
Speaker 9: But it would have but it was blank. So
Speaker 8: She said then, the tabulator would uncover for that. And then it would be spoiled at that time.
Speaker 9: I see. And then you there was another ballot that you identified, you challenged specifically?
Speaker 8: Absolutely. Because when they they scanned it. The little window
Speaker 9: that it was
Speaker 0: just a duplicate.
Speaker 8: Computer. It said duplicate already processed.
Speaker 9: So what happened with that? So they
Speaker 8: they initially put it into the provisional ballot folder like they should have. Okay. And I thought that was great. And I was like, awesome. We got a process that's working here.
And then when I went up at the end of my shift because I was told there was gonna be reinforcements. So I left at 5 AM. It was a long day. And I'm from Grand Rapids. She told me that that All of the ballots in the provisional folder would be taken out and put into the folder to be tabulated because the tabulator would uncover the error.
The that Tabulator would find out that this was a duplicate ballot. And I asked her that twice because I was under the impression that the tabulator is a counter. That So I asked her, how will the tabulator uncover that? She told me and she assured me the tabulator would uncover the error.
Speaker 20: Okay. Do you that Have, when you speak about an audit and a complete audit, how do you what would you see as the appropriate type of that Would it be a forensic audit? Would it be a hand recount of ballots? What would you like to see done?
Speaker 16: 71% of Detroit cannot be recounted, that Which means that the boxes that the ballots are in cannot be opened. 71% is egregious, that And it happens in these communities of color. So if you cannot recount it because of a, quote, clerical error according to, that Secretary Benson. These are not clerical errors. These ballots are hidden in.
You can hide them in there until you're able to open them. That There are processes that have been allowed so that when those when you cannot balance your precinct, you can go to a accounting board or a board that To evaluate them at that time, those those errors are supposed to be fixed, and they can open up that The ballots. The only way to open up the ballots right now to get your ideas on it is for you to do a complete forensic audit that that needs to be done to open up those ballots because a recount is only gonna get you 71% that Of the ticker tape that says these are the numbers, and there are bad ballots inside. You cannot look at the ballots if you do a recount. That You need an audit in order to do a forensic audit to look at those ballots.
Some absentee ballots that were coming in that We're not even folded. How do you have a a pristine, flat, ballot that Without being folded, if it was an absentee ballot. And therein lies some of the problems. And once it goes into the machine multiple times, that You cannot open up the case. If you put the wrong number on the seal, you can't open it up.
If you put in it doesn't balance, that You can't open it up. And so there's problems with what's going on. We need to open up those ballots to for the integrity that because we cannot move forward in any further election.
Speaker 11: Can I ask a follow-up?
Speaker 20: So I am curious, that because I understand that a lot of them didn't balance. What is the appropriate process once you get done with the election, and you you've come, you've you've done the ballot count, that And you realize that they're not balancing. What would the would the appropriate process be right then?
Speaker 16: The precinct inspectors or the precinct captain who was supposed to be trained that are supposed to, contact the clerk's office if there is any problem with balancing. You're supposed to know that And have your hand on how many provisional ballots, how many spoiled ballots, where are the missing ballots, that What's going on, you're supposed to take care of it at the precinct level and then close your precinct. But if some reason you're not able to, there's accounting board that Where you take your ballots to to turn them in to say, I testified that I did this, and I've got my paperwork. I've got my poll books. I've got the notes written down in the poll books that Or in our electronic poll books.
And that counting board is supposed to say, you're not in balance. Let us open up that that container and make sure those poll books are are we can look at the ballots. We physically can look at them. But in these urban areas, they're lazy, And they're not taking this, the civic right very seriously or their duties very seriously. They take an oath when they do as a that precinct inspector.
They are not taking it seriously and have not for years. And the apathy toward the, the official duties here that Has become egregious because once they decide not to balance that precinct, then it goes through and you have the hot mess that you had, that Where you have these, canvassers board of canvassers for people that is supposed to amen that that That hot mess. Flint has never been able to balance, never been able to balance, and there's touch points across that where they have the ability to open that up, to do a, quote, honest, open of the ballot itself, the container itself. That If you're not able to open that container up, which after it leaves the accounting board, you're not able to do it unless you get a court order or an audit. And no one has been brave enough to do it.
71% of Detroit cannot be counted recounted. That We have nothing. And when we did a recount before, we saw some of the most egregious things when we looked through and did recounts before that In Detroit, there's some things in there that should never have been in there. And that is what I'm telling you about when you're able to open up those, that Ballot boxes. But it is not going to be at the Detroit canvasser level and certainly not at the Michigan State Board of Canvas level.
There. Thank you.
Speaker 21: So one more thing is what I wanna show you, and this is one that totally bothers me. That that There is nothing voted on this ballot. Everybody agree? Mhmm. It's a 100% blank ballot.
That I can go over here and tell it to stop adjudication, that And I can tell it to scan and adjudicate all ballots. I can go and vote that That blank ballot.
Speaker 0: Oh, wow.
Speaker 19: Charles. Oh,
Speaker 10: no. I mean, it's
Speaker 0: that Mister, can you stand a ballot more than once?
Speaker 21: I've just done it.
Speaker 1: That Yeah.
Speaker 0: You just keep scanning. Usually
Speaker 21: I just kept scanning that same like,
Speaker 0: you just keep sending I
Speaker 21: just scanned the same batches that y'all just voted. That Mhmm. I never got any more until that one.
Speaker 0: Know why they approved such a system. Don't get it. Mhmm.
Speaker 21: That To see, as I have it right now, I have it to do ambiguous mark and over votes. That It's supposed to do blank ballots. So let's see that If it does the blank ballots like it's supposed to. Let's see. That It scanned it.
I'm going to accept it into the system, that And now let's see if it goes over for adjudication. Or that And these red lines show me that these batches were adjudicated, that I touched those ballots, that That someone touched those ballots. But it does not know that I, Misty Martin, touched those ballots.
Speaker 10: That So they can be tracked which ones were adjudicated.
Speaker 21: It can be tracked, but it cannot be tracked to exactly what ballot it was.
Speaker 2: That tracked, but it can't be traced.
Speaker 21: Right. So, okay, it sent it to adjudication, that And there's my batch, my blank ballot that I want to adjudicate, that And I'm gonna vote for Doug Collins. I'm going to vote for Bubba, and I am going to that completed, and I just counted that vote.
Speaker 22: Holy cow.
Speaker 0: Is she working? That Yeah. If you intend to be honest, it works fine. Say that
Speaker 21: one more time.
Speaker 0: I said it works fine for honest people.
Speaker 21: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Those who intend that to do wrong, though. Certainly can. That's right.
Speaker 21: Alright. I'm cutting it off.
Speaker 0: That
Speaker 1: Page 15. Alright. Page 15 is an example of a new voter registration receipt. That In Michigan, what can we do now as as new votes? We can register to vote up and through election day.
That The computer system, the electronic code book program is downloaded on Saturday before election day.
Speaker 0: That It is not a
Speaker 1: live feed. So if someone registers on Sunday or Monday, they're not gonna be in your computer. That But they should have a receipt when they register. If they do not vote at the time they register, they give them a receipt to bring to the priestly. That So mister Stark, he came in.
You looked and you didn't find him. So you're gonna say mister Stark, that Are you a registered voter in Michigan? Mister Stark is gonna say sure. I'm Ironman. That I flew in yesterday, and I'm registered to vote.
Right? Mister Starks, did they give you a receipt?
Speaker 0: That Hopefully he will have 1.
Speaker 1: He would have either. Right up under here. That The 1st type of receipt he might have is gonna say process him as a challenge voter. Everybody highlight that. That Then below that, it says note to election inspector.
Highlight that. Because those are gonna be the directions on how you process this ballot. That The one down below says, process him as a regular voter. A regular ballot. Highlight that.
So there are 2 separate types of receipts. That The 1st receipt is going to tell you to process him as a challenge voter. The 2nd receipt will tell you to that come as a regular voter. They might have either one.
Speaker 0: That
Speaker 6: about the military ballots. When it was time to count the military ballots wrap up. Pardon?
Speaker 9: I'll give you 15 more seconds
Speaker 6: to they Not one of the military ballots was a registered voter, and the ballots looked like they were all exactly the same Xerox copies that Of the ballot, they were all for Biden across the board. There wasn't a single Trump vote, and none of the the voters were registered. They had to manually enter the names and addresses and a birth date of that 1 120, which would override the system and allow them to enter non registered voters, of which I saw several that day. Throughout the day, that's how they would they voters that were neither in the electronic poll book or the supplemental updated poll book. Thank you.
Speaker 0: That that that that that
Speaker 23: So we had to trump up our recruiting process for the City of Detroit. And what we did at the top of the year, we worked with the Detroit Public Schools. Detroit Public Schools has 22 high schools And we called in, all of the student council representatives for each school And brought them in and talked to them about Democracy for Tomorrow. The beauty of that was the fact that we thought that we could kill 2 birds with that One stone. 1st and foremost, introduce voters, students, to the voting process.
And then the other part was we can register students to vote and recruit. We were able to register approximately 1200 students to vote for the upcoming election cycles, But the beautiful thing that occurred for us was the fact that, in one day we were able to recruit more than 700 poll workers, With that Democracy for Tomorrow program, the next process is to make sure that each one of those students have an opportunity To go through our training program. We start training poll workers approximately 60 days prior to the election And each one of those students will have an opportunity to go through the training process to ensure that they have a fundamental understanding of, that what they need to do at the precinct on Election Day.
Speaker 1: We know that we have a lot of high school students as CPIs. That And if you can't go to receiving the records late at night. Right? If you can't go, you need to tell your that Chairperson early in the day. Hey, I can't do the receiving board.
They will choose someone else to go with them.
Speaker 17: That that You actually can make that to borrow me the $50 if you took this laptop to the. But I stress that This only happened if your EPIs are a teenager. A lot of our EPIs are teenagers, you know, in high school. And they can't send them to you once to 3 in the morning. That So, you know, they need someone to drop us that off.
Because on election day, you will have you you have numbers for troubleshooters like myself and different coordinators. That But honestly speaking, it's gonna be hard to, you know, get ahold of someone because it's gonna be 10 people calling for, a mishap at the same time.
Speaker 24: That And, we ended up calling the war room in Lansing because I said, no. They have to call the clerk and have the ballot spoiled before they can issue him another ballot. That And, they didn't agree with me, so we've got that straight straightened out and that was true. They had to call the clerk. Well, the clerk that Wasn't answering.
They they were they weren't getting any answers. So I know they were just continuing to give people ballots that had, that You know, the question mark
Speaker 0: because no one would answer it at the clerk's office. That
Speaker 1: What do you notice about his name?
Speaker 2: It's pushed
Speaker 1: red and black.
Speaker 19: Absentee ballot. Absentee ballot.
Speaker 1: Absentee ballot what? That Sent and received. Do not what? You're not. National or him are valid.
That Mister Allen, we have received your ballot. Thank you very much. Received. For voting. Would you like a I wrote a that Right?
He's already voted. It's no reason for him to vote again at all. That Ever. That day. He's done.
But what if he gets what? That Loud. Rude. Rude. That's not me.
I need a vote. I don't wanna vote. That And just ask the purest right? That What can you do? Your chairperson can issue him what type of ballot?
Speaker 0: A provisional.
Speaker 1: A provisional envelope. That Why? Where is it going?
Speaker 0: I don't know that's not
Speaker 1: Not in the tabulator. It's going in that envelope. Right? That He we have how many days? 6.
So what is the Department of Elections gonna do with it? Alright.
Speaker 0: Well, I hope
Speaker 1: Destroy there.
Speaker 4: It's been long. A 120,000 have been published. That So, again, gone through the tabulator about a 120,000. About that 80,000 of those have been published, meaning they've gone through the adjudication process. They've been looked at.
There's no errors,
Speaker 0: that And they're good
Speaker 4: to go. The difference still has to go through that process, and you could ask the election consultant detailed information that About that process.
Speaker 22: Well, as the clerk mentioned, we've had a very active day here at TCF in terms of tabulating. We started on that yesterday, at 10 o'clock, and we've been at it, all day today. And as a result, we were able to tabulate that Upwards of a 129,000 absentee ballots. As she mentioned, about 48,000 of those are going that through the adjudication process. Let me explain that a little bit for you.
Our Dominion system, when we go when the ballot is processed through the high that tabulator. What occurs is is that it takes a snapshot of those ballots that have over votes, under votes, blank ballots, and they And then those ballots have to be looked at from a Democrat by a Democrat and a Republican. So at this point in time, there's about that 48,000 ballots that are still in the pipe. But as the clerk mentioned, we're very confident, that we'll be through this process by this time on tomorrow.
Speaker 25: With the adjudication process, when you're one of the there. Education process. When you're one of the one of the main arguments from Georgia has been, well, we've done 2 hand recounts. That Well, counting counterfeit money twice doesn't give you a different outcome. It gives you the same outcome.
So what we keep trying to explain to people, and we testified that To this point, when we we were in front of the senate committee in Georgia, and we explained, if you put a ballot in and it's adjudicated, that original ballot that with the voters' original intent is gone. So now there's a new ballot that you have that can be printed, and then they can keep that that as their record. So now when you're comparing them, they all add up. And it looks like, oh, yeah. That voter wanted to vote that way.
But that's not how the voter voted. That That's how the adjudicator determined voter intent, and that changes that outcome. And that's why that doesn't make any sense. An adjudication is supposed to have that Two witnesses from either party. Sometimes there's even an independent as well.
Those processes didn't happen. We spoke to the adjudicators. They didn't have that at all.
Speaker 26: So bottom line is with many of these ballots, it may just simply be impossible at this point to know the original voter intent.
Speaker 25: Exactly right. That Especially because the ballots are separated from their envelopes. They're put into a machine. There's no audit logs. There's no that login credentials.
The machine is already logged on. They don't even have to log in. You don't even know who made the change. There's no tracking. This is our most important civic duty, that And we have absolutely no receipt or record of what we've done.
And now that we're pointing out the errors and we're showing that there is a trail, And that the data speaks very clearly to that. They're saying, no. Nothing to see here. We don't want to look at that. Why?
Speaker 27: Adjudicate a large amount of ballots. Right? You can adjudicate a batch of a 100 and just say, okay, a 100 for for Biden, a 100 for Trump, however it works. And that entire batch that will now destroy the record for every single one of those ballots and move the vote to exactly what they put. And that's, that These are these are supposed to be adjudications individually, but that doesn't necessarily happen.
Speaker 28: What I witnessed, at the TCF center was complete fraud.
Speaker 0: That The whole 27 hours I
Speaker 28: was there, there was, batches of ballots being ran through the tabulating machines that Numerous times, being counted 8 to 10 times. I watched this with my own eyes. I was there to assist with IT. That these people on night shift, I had 4 people on night shift that I've known. One of them, I've known for over 20 years.
That He approached me and said he had absolutely zero training whatsoever, contradicting a 100% what Daniel Baxter claims, that they had so much training. That He said they had 0. I watched. These people had no idea what they were doing. Okay.
That Also, the, adjudication process, I witnessed numerous people walking up, claiming they were both Democrats, that Saying they were going they were sitting together judging ballots all night together, all day together. I witnessed it all. I was on the main stage with all of the city officials. That Daniel Baxter was in on the whole thing. And I am under the impression, a 100%, that, that At least 90% of those workers were all in on this.
There was not a single ballot the whole night, the whole 27 hours I was there that that I saw that was for Donald Trump, not one, not a single ballot. That is that is scary.
Speaker 10: That On the day of voting, became aware that we didn't have enough that GOP people available for doing simple things like duplication of ballots. That Excuse me again. The, point I wanna make is that, I approached Daniel Baxter, who was the that chairman for the, for this, AV center and asked him about directly, you know, about the number of GOP people that were there that Waiting for, a duplication of a ballot, and none showed up. So at that point, I asked him how many GOP people were workers that There were. He says, oh, we have about 10 or 12.
He says, well, are they on the on the tabulators? He says, oh, no. We don't need them over there. That This is they're on the adjudication, tables. And, 10 to 12 people didn't even man all the stations that were there, that Which, again, indicated to me that there was not a, an adequate number of, Republicans, that opposing to, validate the proper, that Dual party evaluation of all these, adjudicator tables, modify the regular ballot Accounting stations.
So
Speaker 12: In September,
Speaker 0: I met one of the bipartisan groups. That Yeah. And they were begging to have the law changed to allow them to pre to pre the congress because they were expecting that Don't load it. That's debouncing, and they would worry about being able to process any time on it much at night. We did allow them to they in in buckets, that I that I would not allow them to reach out.
They'll be didn't prove the. They'll be recording. Yeah. Now there. Time.
I regret that because, that's created a lot of, particularly, CCA.
Speaker 29: While our election workers across the state work to that Count each and every valid ballot. We have to honor that work that went in today to making sure every vote got in, honor the work that went in to it throughout these that Past month to ensure every absentee ballot was delivered and received on time. We're gonna know much more in the hours and days ahead, that of of that how that particular issue with the postal service affected Detroit and affected Michigan. I can say a couple of things. 1, The attorney general was at the Detroit processing center and the Pontiac center yesterday.
Actually, with eyes on any ballots, any election mail that That still had to be delivered and and was given every assurance that it would be delivered before polls closed today. And so you have to ask her for more information about that About that particular experience, but the assurance I got from her and the confidence I got from her was that we would see any mail that was left moving, but we didn't see a significant amount of mail that That was, supposed to reach Clarkson, Michigan that was, stuck or in any way delayed. What I've been looking at are the overall numbers, How many ballots have been sent out and how many have come back. And to have what we were at this morning, which was a 92% return rate was actually much higher than we've been at at past elections. That and so we're gonna continue to track that because we know, again, ballots kept coming in until 8 o'clock today, and that's why I said we'll ultimately know more, that in the hours ahead about about how many ballots got in and if any, were delayed or or should have gotten in.
Speaker 12: So and And then we had a new shipment announcement by mister Baxter at 4:30 AM on the microphone. He's saying, hey. We're gonna have some ballots coming in. So these ballots these boxes of ballots that brought in by mister Baxter, and his team at 4:30 am from the rear of the room, the TCF center. That so approximately, I I witnessed them bringing in boxes from the rear end of the room into the into the room.
This This is between 4:30 and 5. We estimate I estimate around, 84 boxes placed on tables in the center of the room. That Each box with approximately 600 ballots, totaling to approximately 50,000 ballots equal to the 2 rounds before. Because we were there From 10 to 1, we did a round about 50,000, and then 1 to about 4, with 2nd round about another 50,000. And then this last round, all you have to know is there's the same amount that ballots from the other 2 rounds.
I'm not sure if they were all brought in from the back because I think they were commingled and also brought in from other other other rooms. So I'm not sure how many that from the back and then from the other areas, but they're putting all it was it was just about the same amount. So most volunteers left at 5 AM, that And, the poll workers had a shift change between 5 and 6 AM. I stayed. At 6 AM, mister Baxter and the management got back on the microphone and yelled, that This is what democracy is supposed to look like in front of everyone, the with the new shift.
Right after that, the whole room cheered. And You can tell there was not a balancing in the poll workers there even at that shift.
Speaker 2: My name is Shane Trejo. I was there as that pole challenger TCF from about 9:30 PM to 5:30 AM, on the night after that election in the morning after the election.
Speaker 0: That that
Speaker 2: that to the back of there's a big, you know, the facility where all the rooms were set up. You go to the back and there's a way that cars would just drive right into the facility. And that was like a a garage door had opened and and cars were coming in with the ballots. From what I saw, there was not 1 ballot that showed up that From at least 10 PM, or let let me say at least 10:30 to the 3:30 AM when, that Roughly, the the number that Colbeck gave was 38,000 ballots showed up. There were I counted over 50 different boxes
Speaker 0: that This is a balance that showed up
Speaker 2: all at once at 3:30 AM. Someone gave an official count, of 61. That So 61 balance, they were all in USPS boxes. They weren't it wasn't delivered by you 61 boxes of balance. Yes.
That Yes. And it wasn't delivered by USPS necessarily. It was in a van, a white van that That had the city clerk's emblem on it. And the city it said, Janice Winfrey, that Some tagline.
Speaker 19: Some reports indicate that there are 2 other vehicles there at the same time. And, I don't know if there's affidavit to that effect. I can say that that Me personally, I went back there and I witnessed a little, mini panel truck, if you will, with Detroit Elections Bureau, that Regalia over the side. It had a vehicle ID number on it. I didn't capture that, but we had other people that captured that information
Speaker 0: or
Speaker 19: and the, license plate number that with it. It looked legit. And inside of it were a and this gets into some chain of custody discussions. There's no verification that there is a republican that a democrat during transfer. We don't know that they didn't take side stops to the nearby Coney Island to pick up a few more ballots from their buddies.
Speaker 0: That We have no way of verifying any of
Speaker 2: that information. Are you supposed to be able to have that information?
Speaker 19: Supposed to be able to, yeah, have verification all the way along that The whole chain of custody were supposed to be there. And because they were not sealed. If they were sealed, all this stuff was sealed and you verify the seal. And then when you came to another destination and you see if the seal's still intact, alright. That's that's that's okay.
Speaker 2: So that's what the verification is supposed to look.
Speaker 19: That That's what we're supposed to see on us. Yeah. When I
Speaker 9: do it in
Speaker 19: the suburbs where I was a, senator, when I when I started to come in, we had pretty much a whole army that would get out of the van,
Speaker 0: that Get out there, pull up all the
Speaker 19: data from the from the precinct, put it in the van under configuration control. Everything was sealed up with the tape and put out there. That There is probably one of the most egregious aspects of what happened in the city of Detroit at the AB accounting board was the utter lack of respect for chain of custody.
Speaker 0: That that that that that that that that that they that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
"I would watch the ballots go by, and there were odd patterns. 7 of those ballots were for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump. That clearly doesn't .. that's not statistically possible." (Fake ballots were found) - https://uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/
Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC
Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer.
uncoverdc.com
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
"The volunteers stop and look at a ballot. The paper was very very thin. The paper was really thin because when they moved it (gestures as if waving a fan) it was really thin." (Only 1 official ballot paper type was approved, 10 types were discovered by voter-volunteers.) https://t.co/CjHsnB1Esi
reSee.it AI Summary
The mail-in ballot ratios heavily favored Biden over Trump, particularly in swing states with issues like late-night freezes and suspicious out-of-state vans. Trump's loss by a narrow margin in these states, combined with the extreme 98:1 mail-in ratios, raises concerns. It's like having incriminating evidence in a murder case, but being told not to investigate further. #ElectionConcerns
@MikeDesrochers1 - Michael Desrochers (Starting Pitcher #69)
This is well documented. This is what every batch of mail in's looked like. 98:1 Biden to Trump ratios. They padded the mail in's on the preconcocted narrative Trump said don't vote by mail, so everybody listened. Yet the ratio was only unilaterally extreme across the swing states that all froze at 3am and had issues with out of state vans at the back door dropping off ocean freight liners of ballots. You simply can't reconcile Trump losing a state in general 49.9% to 50.01%, but losing every mail in batch 98:1, while that also only happening in specific states that sw 90% turnout in comparison to the average of 68%, and had deviations of voter turnout 7 deviations from the norm while the majority (40 or so) states behaved normally. Collectively, this is the equivalent of having OJ Simpsons bloody shoe, bloody work shirt, and a strand of his hair on the knife, and Bill Barr saying there's no signs of foul play. ...and you can't look into it any further or we'll arrest you, got it? @RealSKeshel @FSociety_1942 @BerryRazi @VincentOshana @KariLake @KariLakeWarRoom
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
"All counted ballots" in Maricopa County are printed on 80lb VoteSecure ballot paper. Except over 200,000 weren't. 10 different types/weights of paper were found by the volunteers who examined the 2.1M ballots. But Joe Biden 'won' Arizona in 2020. https://rumble.com/vn4kgx-the-american-faces-behind-the-audit.html
The American Faces Behind The Audit
We would like to give a huge flyover family thank you to each person in this video for tirelessly working for a safe and secure election for us all! #SavingAmerica ► Sign Up For Our Newsletter! -https
rumble.com
@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr.
In the circles I run in, it's understood that Jeffrey Epstein's money went to FTX. Once you start looking there are links to the Mossad at every turn. What do you think about that? https://t.co/MA8weRid8b
Video Transcript AI Summary
Confirmed by multiple sources, the individuals who were on Epstein Island include Bill Clinton, George Mitchell, Alec Baldwin, Ralph Fiennes, George Hamilton, Dustin Hoffman, Kevin Spacey, Liz Hurley, Laura Hunt, Janice Dickinson, Naomi Campbell, Christy Turlington, Henry Kissinger, Joan Rivers, Courtney Love, Mick Jagger, Phil Collins, Simon Le Bon, Charlie Rose, Richard Branson, Candace Bushnell, Tom Ford, Vera Wang, and more. Additionally, Seth Green, James Gunn, Dan Schneider, Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks, Stephen Colbert, Kathy Griffin, Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce Knowles, Jim Carrey, Ben Affleck, Madonna, Gwen Stefani, James Franco, Will Smith, and others are mentioned. There are allegedly videos of these individuals, but it is uncertain if they will be released.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are the people that were on Epstein Island, confirmed by multiple sources. Bill Clinton, George Mitchell, Alex Baldwin, Ralph Finese, George Hamilton, Dustin Hoffman, Kevin Spacey, Liz Hurley, Laura Hunt, Janice Dixon, Naomi Campbell, Christy Turlington, Henry Kissinger, which may be one of the most evil men on the world. He is. Yeah. Joan Rivers, Courtney Love, Mick Jagger, Courtney Guest, Phil Collins, Simon Le Bon, Charlie Rose of PBS, Richard Branson, Candace Bushell, Tom Ford, Vera Wang, Nadia Byerlein, co star, and here's some more.
Seth Green, James Gunn, Dan Schneider, Steven Spielberg, Tom Tom Hanks, Stephen Colbert. Mhmm. Kevin Spacey, Kevin, Kathy Griffin, Oprah Winfrey, Shawn Carter, Beyonce Knowles, Anthony Kiedis, John Legend, Christy Teigen, Jim Carrey, Steven Tyler, Ben Affleck, Steven Collins, Will Ferrell, Eminem, Jeffrey Jones, Victor Silva, Mark Rector, Charlie Sheen, Tyler Grashem, Madonna, Catherine Hudson, Gwen Stefani, Stefani Grimalta, James Franco, Will Smith. Oh, has Will Smith been in the news lately? Justin Rowland, John Cusack, Anderson Cooper, Demi Moore, Brian Affleck, Meryl Streep, Wanda Sykes, Chelsea Handler, Michelle Wolf, Farrell Williams, Quentin Tarantino, Robert Downey Junior.
They are petrified of that list and what those films getting out. They have all the videos of all those people in there. Really? Yep. It's gonna get ugly.
They're impeccable. So are they gonna release those videos, or what what do they keep them? I'm told well, it's it's looking like they're holding it back that 1 person has control of that, but I'm told other people have them and are going to release them at the right time. So we
@GOPoversight - Oversight Committee
🚨 BREAKING 🚨 We have found a $200,000 DIRECT payment to Joe Biden. @RepJamesComer lays out the money trail. 👇 https://t.co/0vq3lqhRHz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bank records obtained by the House Committee on Oversight reveal a $200,000 direct payment from James and Sarah Biden to President Joe Biden in the form of a personal check. James Biden had received $600,000 in loans from AmeriCorps based on his last name's influence. On the same day, AmeriCorps wired $200,000 into James and Sarah Biden's personal bank account, and James Biden wrote a $200,000 check to Joe Biden as a loan repayment. This raises questions about President Biden's personal benefit from his family's questionable financial dealings. The House oversight committee will continue investigating and following the money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This summer, Joe Biden said, where's the money? Well, we found some. We're still digging into evidence subpoenaed from bank accounts belonging to Hunter Biden, the son of president Joe Biden, and James and Sarah Biden, the brother and sister-in-law of the president. A document that we're releasing today raises new questions about how president Biden personally benefited from his family's shady influence peddling of his last name and their access to him. Bank records obtained by the House Committee on Oversight have revealed a $200,000 direct payment from James and Sarah Biden to Joe Biden in the form of a personal check.
Here's some important context about this check we've obtained in our investigation. In 2018, James Biden received $600,000 in loans from AmeriCorps, a financially distressed and failing rural hospital operator. According to bankruptcy court documents, James Biden received these loans, quote, based upon representations that his last name, Biden, could open doors and that he could obtain a large investment from the Middle East based on his political connections, end quote. On March 1 2018, AmeriCorps wired a $200,000 loan into James and Sarah Biden's personal bank account, not their business bank account. And then on the very same day, James Biden wrote a $200,000 check from this same personal bank account to Joe Biden.
James Biden wrote this check to Joe Biden as a, quote, loan repayment. AmeriCorps, a distressed company, loaned money to James Biden who then sent it to Joe Biden. Even if this was a personal loan repayment, It's still troubling that Joe Biden's ability to be paid back by his brother depended on the success of his family's shady financial dealings. Some immediate questions president Biden must answer for the American people. Does he have documents proving he lent such a large sum of money to his brother?
And what were the terms of such financial agreement. Did he have similar financial agreements with other family members that led them to make similar large payments to him. And did he know that the same day James Biden wrote him a check for $200,000, James Biden had just received a loan for the exact same amount from business dealings with a company that was in financial distress and failing. Accounts. The house oversight committee will soon announce our next investigative actions and continue to follow the money.
The bank records don't end here.
@Michael_JohnsSr - Michael Johns🇺🇸
Fact: It was not "safe". Fact: It was not "effective". Fact: It was deadly and disabling for many, possibly tens of millions. And now this: @NHS researchers see connections between COVID-19 vaccines and the onset of rheumatological ailments:
COVID-19 Vaccines 'May Trigger' Rheumatic Inflammatory Diseases: Study
On average, patients developed rheumatic diseases 11 days after vaccine administration, according to the study.
theepochtimes.com
@sheikhfuqqer - Mohammed
Don't be like Mia Khalifa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel, a state since 1948, is 3000 years old, according to a proud Muslim. Many prophets disseminated their teachings in Canaan, later renamed Israel by Joshua Ben Nun. King David declared Jerusalem as the capital. Jesus referred to the land as Israel in the gospel of Matthew. The Roman Emperor Hadrian expelled Jews, replacing Judea with Syria Palestine, which evolved into Palestine. Shechem became Neapolis or Nablus. Israelis are not foreign colonialists, and coexistence is crucial. The video aims to correct misinformation and promote peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel has only been a state since 1948. Palestine is thousands of years old. Sorry, Mia. You are wrong. Israel is 3000 years old, 75 years young.
And this is not coming from a Jew, but from a proud Muslim. The prophets of God whom I believe in were Israelites. A significant number of these prophets disseminated their teachings in the land of Canaan, a land which Joshua Ben Nun later renamed Israel. And then king David proclaimed Jerusalem as the nation's capital. Yes, Mia.
It wasn't Donald j Trump. It was King David. Even Jesus of Nazareth, Mia, Call the land Israel in the gospel of Matthew. The Roman Emperor Hadrian expelled Jews from Israel, erasing the name Judea. He supplanted it with the Roman Latin term Syria Palestine, which evolved into Palestine.
Similarly, the city of Shechem was changed to Neapolis or Nablus, which means in Roman Latin, new city or new place. The Jewish people, dear Mia, are not foreign colonialists in the land of Israel. I wish you'd informed your audience that Israelis and Palestinians ought to coexist peacefully, And that peace is the only way, not marring history or disseminating falsehoods. Please share this video as it may reach Mia and others So that they know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
@DavidWolfe - David Wolfe
reSee.it AI Summary
A motion has been filed to compel the government to produce materials related to undercover police at the Capitol on January 6. New evidence reveals illicit behavior by undercover police. Footage shows officers allowing protestors access and expressing disbelief. Undercover officers filmed curfew arrests, but not all recordings have been released. Questions arise about altered bodycam footage. The motion also highlights an intel report mentioning a handler for Enrique Tarrio. Access the full motion and public video exhibits for more details.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
I have filed a motion to compel the government to produce all materials related to undercover police at the Capitol on January 6, and to produce missing police body camera recordings. This motion presents new evidence of illicit behavior by undercover police at the Capitol.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
Police bodycams are important to January 6 defenses because they reveal real-time candid assessments. My motion includes an exhibit of Officer Joseph Young’s recording that captures Officer Pittmon assessing that police had “fucked this shit all the way up.”
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
Another exhibit features footage from Officer Matthew Fleming that shows officers being ordered by their supervisors to let protestors have access to the west terrace door. Afterwards, an officer in the unit says, “I can’t believe they let them in”
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
Last November I filed a motion pointing out undercover police urged J6 protestors to advance up the steps to the Capitol. The government finally produced two of Leiva’s recordings in April. The footage is completely black for 5 minutes as Leiva and Callahan walked up the steps.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
Not only did Officer Tomasula urge protestors to advance up the steps to the Capitol, he also infiltrated the Proud Boys in December 2020, used department funds to buy Proud Boys gear, and passed intel to the FBI. The government is hiding 90 fully redacted pages of text messages between Tomasula and the Proud Boys.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
A recently disclosed MPD internal investigation revealed that Detective Ricardo Leiva observed people breaking glass windows at the Capitol, and ran up to them saying, “hey what’s up man, you’re doing an amazing job, awesome awesome awesome.” Leiva claims he recorded this, but the recording has not been produced in discovery.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
Detective Callahan was also recording on J6, but MPD claims he did not have a recording device with him on J6, even though video clearly shows him holding a cell phone. No footage has been produced for Callahan.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
Undercover officer Ryan Roe noted that he was using a Canon XA40 to film on January 6. Thanks to a viral thread that shows a man holding the same model of camera, I have been able to identify Roe in the crowd.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
By synchronizing sealed footage from @Twinity5’s January 7, 2021 viral thread, I discovered that undercover officer Ryan Roe thanked #FenceCutterBulwark as he removed fencing. “Appreciate it brother,” said Roe, as Twinity5 captured this frame.
@Twinity5 - Zudotoji
1) First off, I watched this plain clothes (no MAGA gear like most) guy go around and methodically cut down all the fences and pull out their posts by himself. Maybe he's just helpful?
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
There was also a team of undercover officers positioned above the west front lines, filming the action below. These officers would go into the Capitol, and at the end of the day they filmed curfew arrests. However, the government has not produced everything they recorded. Several new bodycam exhibits from my filing show these officers.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
Undercover police also filmed curfew arrests outside hotels on the night of January 6. The government has designated all video recorded by undercover officers as “sensitive” to prevent public release, but bodycam footage showing the same arrest scene is not considered sensitive.
Video Transcript AI Summary
There were only 4 porta potties provided for the 50,000 people attending the event. This intentional lack of facilities made it difficult for us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know you know, they there were 4 porta potties out there for us today. 4. 4 of them. 4 porta potties. Now what is that?
You know, there's there's 50,000 people out there and 4 fucking porta potties. Four porta potties. We're not the porta potties. I know that, but the point is that It was intentional. It was intentionally programmed to make it difficult for us.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
My motion raises several questions about bodycam footage, including whether footage has been altered to remove inconvenient evidence. A recording from Neil McAllister strangely went blank (twice) as he beat protestors. This exhibit shows him throwing punches even after a man tells him he is down and no longer resisting. McAllister's bodycam supposedly turned off for 20 seconds as these punches were thrown.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
The second gap in McAllister’s footage occurred in the tunnel as he and Lt. Bagshaw were beating the defenseless Victoria White in the head. For both gaps, McAllister’s camera did not beep (as normal) when the recording resumed less than a minute later.
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
You can access a PDF copy of my full motion here: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/wf6dai7qanlsaln9oevfo/139-Motion-to-Compel-Production-of-Undercover-Police-Materials-and-Police-Bodycam-Recordings.pdf?rlkey=ozfg0pjxu931l1dod1b5p2cnm&dl=0
139 - Motion to Compel Production of Undercover Police Materials and Police Bodycam Recordings.pdf
Shared with Dropbox
dropbox.com
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
You can access the 27 public video exhibits from my motion here: https://rumble.com/c/21cr128 Two additional exhibits contain footage designated as ‘sensitive’ by the government and were submitted under seal (not public).
21-cr-128 Exhibits
Browse the most recent videos from channel "21-cr-128 Exhibits" uploaded to Rumble.com
rumble.com
@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸
An interesting intel report filed by undercover Officer Tomasula described Enrique Tarrio having a "handler" in December 2020. https://t.co/wHTLlDYis1
@LucyRae509 - Ali Rae
@robertdunlap947 @RealCaptainMaga https://itnshow.com/2021/01/07/read-affidavit-delivered-to-congress-yesterday-declaring-confession-of-election-interference-by-italian-defense-contractor-employee/?fbclid=IwAR1KyPbYvMOmqdrWehAPLTj-V56oefK2JFS-RoMPy5n1C6H9wNBpUdRijyo
Read: Affidavit Delivered to Congress Yesterday Declaring Confession of Election Interference by Italian Defense Contractor Employee
A sworn affidavit was delivered to Congress yesterday detailing confessions by an employee of Italian defense contractor Leonardo SpA. The affidavit was written by the employee’s lawye…
itnshow.com