reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@andrewrsorkin - Andrew Ross Sorkin
Watch my conversation with @ElonMusk: https://t.co/YedkELVhFn
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Elon Musk explains the importance of free speech. https://t.co/Mt3e2EhBcY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Old Twitter was heavily influenced by the government, which violated the First Amendment. The reason for this amendment is to protect freedom of speech, as many immigrants came from places where it was restricted. If we allow censorship, it won't be long before we ourselves are censored. That's why the First Amendment exists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The I mean, the the the degree to which, old Twitter was basically a soft puppet of the government was ridiculous. So, you know, it seems to me that there's a very severe violation of the First Amendment in terms of how much government control how much control the government had over all Twitter. And it no longer does. So, you know, there's a reason for the First Amendment. The reason for the First Amendment for freedom of speech is because the people that immigrated to this country Came from places where there was not freedom of speech.
And and they were like, you know what? We we we we got to make sure that that's constitutional. Because where they came from, if they said something, they'd be put in prison, whether it be, you know, something bad would happen to them. So And freedom of speech, you have to say, when is it relevant? It's only relevant when when someone you don't like can say something you don't like or It has no meaning.
And as soon as you sort of Throw in the towel and concede to censorship. It is only a matter of time before someone censors you. And that is why we have the First Amendment.
@LegendaryEnergy - An0maly
Tucker Carlson tells Elon Musk this is “confirmed”. https://t.co/1cZnH1ngYx
@patel_patriot - Jon Herold
Lol Grok basically calling @elonmusk a hypocrite https://t.co/OaJrZ8cpDK
@TashfeenKhanPML - Tashfeen Khan Official
@elonmusk This is a real love story . https://t.co/YZ6KAB4UvF
@CramerTracker - Inverse Cramer (Not Jim Cramer)
Thank God Elon bought Twitter https://t.co/mNyhpxNtlm
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Tiktoker has unhinged meltdown over Elon supporting Trump https://t.co/XjixV3B373
Video Transcript AI Summary
I dislike Elon Musk because he has donated $10 trillion, which he doesn't need as a trillionaire. He supports other trillionaires instead of donating to important causes like the Biden Harris campaign. Additionally, he made Twitter worse and his father owns emerald mines.
Translation: I dislike Elon Musk because he has donated $10 trillion, which he doesn't need as a trillionaire. He supports other trillionaires instead of donating to important causes like the Biden Harris campaign. Additionally, he made Twitter worse and his father owns emerald mines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hate Elon Musk. Do you even know how much money he has donated? It's a Trump. $10,000,000,000,000. He doesn't need that money.
He's already a trillionaire. There's trillionaire supporting other trillionaires. You know how much money of that could be donated to worthwhile causes? Like like the Biden Harris campaign. He made Twitter suck.
And his dad owns Emeralds mines.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Elon Musk just confirming what everyone already knows about Bill Gates ‼️ https://t.co/VdrRptnw2u
@IsabellaMDeLuca - Isabella Maria DeLuca
Elon Musk said Rachel Maddow and Mark Cuban remind him of a Iesbian couple from Portland. I can’t unsee it now. https://t.co/6uN98E41av
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 suggests Trump's history of targeting businesses and leaders who he perceives as political enemies should make him "radioactive" to the business world. Speaker 1 notes that, with the exception of Elon Musk, few CEOs of large companies publicly support Trump, fearing retribution. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to elaborate on a statement that some business leaders support Trump because they believe they can manipulate him. Speaker 1 explains that these leaders see the relationship as transactional, believing they can influence policy with the right amount of money, citing crypto as an example.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of the targeting that he is talking about for a second term and what we saw in his first term when he picked out individual businesses or sometimes individual business leaders who he wanted to use the government to punish. When he went after Amazon and Jeff Bezos, when he went after saying he wanted to go after Mark Zuckerberg, when he did other things that were targeting businesses because of what were perceived to be his political interests, I would have thought that that would have made him radioactive in the business world because business people are too smart to think that they can always be on the right side of those calculations. Right? That they won't ever be the one who's in the crosshairs once you've got somebody who uses the government that way to reward and punish his enemies and and and his friends.
Speaker 1: Well, you don't hear a whole lot of CEOs other than Elon Musk, particularly of large companies coming out and supporting him for that very reason. You know, you don't hear them condemning him because they're worried about his rep retribution or his his vengeance. But literally, there's been nobody that I know other than Leon Elon that has come out in support of him.
Speaker 0: You recently said in an interview that some business leaders who are supporting Trump with the caveat of what you just described in terms of, you know, high level leaders, not too many of them doing it. You said that some business leaders who are supporting Trump are doing it because they think they can manipulate him. Can you explain what you what you mean by that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's very transactional. For the right amount, you know, you can guide policy. I think you saw that with crypto.
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
What? Walz just referred to Elon as ‘gay’? https://t.co/haPN9v2ptK
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you're a billionaire, like Elon Musk, you might benefit from tax cuts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're a billionaire, Elon Musk for example say, that guy that guy got Michigan knows that word. Look, look that dude got a tax cut.
@farzyness - Farzad
Elon Musk Stuns Joe Rogan. Thank you @DavidCarbutt_ for the edit. @elonmusk @joerogan
Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you for purchasing Twitter. Your acquisition has significantly impacted history, preventing further censorship and control over narratives. The deplatforming of Trump was particularly alarming, as he was urging calm during unrest. The conversation highlights the absurdity of labeling his peaceful messages as incitement. There are concerns about government interference in social media, with organizations pushing for advertiser boycotts and using the DOJ to target companies like SpaceX. The discussion emphasizes the importance of free speech and the dangers of misinformation, particularly from legacy media. The Twitter files revealed extensive government influence on the platform, with Twitter welcoming this interference and even getting paid for it. This raises serious constitutional concerns about the government's access to social media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you so much for buying Twitter.
Speaker 1: You're welcome.
Speaker 0: So much.
Speaker 1: You're welcome.
Speaker 0: I'm not exaggerating when I think you changed the course of history. I really do. I really think you you made a fork in the road. We were headed down a path of censorship and of control of narratives that is unprecedented. Forget about what they were able to do back when they had newspapers and the media under control.
That what they were doing with social media by suppressing information and when you had a combined government effort, like, what what they were doing with the laptop story. Yep. We have 51 former intelligence agents saying that this is Russian disinformation. Yeah. Take it off offline.
Yeah. And Twitter complied.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: If you didn't buy that, we wouldn't have known that. We had no idea.
Speaker 1: Exactly. The reason I bought it was because I'm pretty attuned since I I was like the most interacted with a user on Twitter before the acquisition. So before the acquisitions that I had more interactions than then there's some accounts like Obama and whatever had higher follower accounts, but I had the most number of interactions of of any account in the system. So I was very attuned to if if they saw change if they change the system, I can tell immediately. And I'm like I'm like, something weird is going on here.
You know? The there's I I just got increasingly uneasy. And obviously, when when they deplatformed the setting president, you know, not deplatform Trump, that was just insane. You know? And and the things he was posting, like, he was posting things that that he was posting good things.
He was saying, like, hey, do do not riot. Don't do any destruction of property. You know, please stay calm. That's the kind of stuff he was posting. Yeah.
And you're like, what's wrong with that? That? That's and and then then some people said, oh, that's like some sort of dog whistle. He means the opposite. I'm like, okay.
So we'll give you Trump's account. Now you you post what you think you should post because you can post nothing. You can ask people to calm down. Like, what? It it was insane.
Like, it didn't make any sense.
Speaker 0: Well, it's completely illogical when you say it's dog whistling to tell his followers to not be violent.
Speaker 1: That's crazy. And crazy. That's crazy. Crazy.
Speaker 0: Don't you think they will listen to him? Yeah. Isn't that the whole point? They listened to him and created violence in the first place? That's what you think.
Speaker 1: That's what you're Exactly.
Speaker 0: You're accusing him of. Right. And then there's the fact that we know that there was agents in the crowd that were agent provocateurs that were encouraging people to do illegal Yes. We know that for a fact. This is not that that was always the big Alex Jones type tinfoil hat conspiracy theory because Alex proposed that back at the World Trade Organization protests.
We I believe we're in Seattle in the nineties. And they sent in agent provocateur, started smashing things, lighting things on fire. Now all of a sudden, a peaceful protest is no longer peaceful. Right. They move in the cops.
They shut everything down. They had it set up where it was a no protest zone where you couldn't even have a pin that had the WTO with a red line through it. They wouldn't let you go in through to go to work. So you couldn't protest. You couldn't exercise your first amendment rights.
You couldn't even have a peaceful protest, a fucking sticker on your car. You couldn't have that. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: It is crazy. I think we're we we're very much in a fork in the road in Destiny. And, I mean, the reason I, you know, did the quarter acquisition was like, man, if if I don't do this, I think we're screwed is the issue.
Speaker 0: Well, if you didn't do it, no one else was gonna do it because it wasn't a financial winner. It was kind of a crazy move.
Speaker 1: It's a crazy move. I mean, the thing was way overpriced and, you know, like, long long term, I think we can we can ultimately make it a win for investors, but, boy, this is a hard way to make a living.
Speaker 0: Well, there's also a concerted effort to suppress it. There's a concerted effort to Yeah. With the advertisers.
Speaker 1: Well, we we we had a I still have a a massive advertiser boycott that was organized by a bunch of left wing NGOs. You know, and and you you always want and I should've I should've brought my I I have a hat make all well fiction again.
Speaker 0: I've seen that hat.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I I should've bought I was gonna wear my I should've bought my make all well fiction hat again. But but yeah. I mean, it's just totally totally nuts.
Speaker 0: If you didn't do it, no one would have. And here's the hilarious narrative that I keep hearing from idiots. Elon's a bad businessman. Twitter is worth, you know, 400% less than when he bought it. No.
It wasn't worth that in the first place.
Speaker 1: It wasn't worth that in the first place.
Speaker 0: It wasn't worth $44,000,000,000. Wrong. And, also, you're not taking into account the advertiser boycott.
Speaker 1: Exactly. That's total Yeah. Ex exactly. So there there are these organizations what now you can tell is that they're, like, when they have an Orwellian name. So, like, the, like, the Center for Countering Digital Hate Right.
Is is a total scam organization, you know, because they're like the Ministry of Truth type
Speaker 0: of thing
Speaker 1: in in in Orwell. You know, they're they're they're, like, they're they're a censorship organization, and they pushed the advertisers to boycott. So we still have some of the boycott is is is starting to lift, and I think if Trump wins, we'll we'll see, you know, probably a lot most most of the boycott lift. But if if Kamala wins, we'll see that boycott get stronger. And and they'll they'll freaking shut down.
There's no way that that the sort of Kamala public regime would allow x to exist.
Speaker 0: You really think that they'll be able to shut it down, though? Is there a pathway to that?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: What would they do?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, they can just they can sic the DOJ on, you know, and say you know, they've had this whole thing about hate speech, misinformation, whatever, except that they're they're the ones pushing the misinformation. But that doesn't stop them from filing massive, you know, lawsuits and using the DOJ. I mean, the DOJ has, you know, been attacking SpaceX, for example, for not hiring asylum seekers even though it is legal for SpaceX to hire anyone who's not a permanent resident of the US. So we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. This is an exam just an example of what DOJ can do.
Speaker 0: So it's illegal to hire someone who's not an American citizen?
Speaker 1: Well, SpaceX, is considered an an advanced weapons technology. So it's it's covered by international traffic and arms regulations because we we make rocket technology that can be used against the United States. So if North North Korea or Iran got SpaceX rocket technology, they could use that to launch nukes at America. Right. That would be bad.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That'd be really bad.
Speaker 1: That'd be really bad. So since we are in, like, the most extreme category of weapons technology at SpaceX, under US ITAR law, it is illegal for us to hire anyone who's not a permanent resident, because the presumption is that if they're not a permanent resident, they're gonna return to their, home country and take the rocket technology with them. So that's and so it's illegal for us to hire anyone who's not a pro either has not a pro they can they can be have a green card or be a citizen. They just have to be a permanent resident of the United States. Then there's another law that says, if you if you discriminate against asylum seekers, that's also you're also breaking the law.
So that the DOJ was not the DOJ the DOJ can only do a small number of big lawsuits every year. They launched a giant lawsuit against SpaceX saying that SpaceX discriminated against asylum seekers. And we're like, but we're like, but it's illegal for us to hire anyone who's not a permanent resident. So we're in this this is what I mean. It's Orwell the Orwell situation is getting insane.
You're damned if you do, and you're damned if you don't. So you're damned.
Speaker 0: Can you imagine history looking back Locked
Speaker 1: up, man.
Speaker 0: At when you watch the robot arms catch the rocket and you realize this is, like, one of the greatest accomplishments in the history of aerospace. Like, it is one of the most wildest accomplishments. Yeah. When you watch that thing come and you see all those people cheering and it catches it perfectly, like, holy imagine how history is gonna look back at the DOJ going after that company. Yeah.
How insane it is.
Speaker 1: Big lawsuit with an army of lawyers. This was not, like, some minor thing. But it doesn't even make any sense. Watch this.
Speaker 0: Like, how can it even get brought to court
Speaker 1: if it's illegal? That's exactly. So that that's what I mean. Like, basically if the government wants to go after you, they'll just find a reason. You know, it's like that famous quote from Beria.
The head of Stalin's secret police and he's like, you've tortured a truly evil human being. Like this guy Beria, he his his one of his famous quotes was show me the man and I'll show you the crime. They, like, they decide that you're the target, and then they figure out the crime afterwards. That's the issue. They decided SpaceX was the target, they just figured out the crime afterwards.
Speaker 0: Which is so crazy because that's exactly what they're saying Trump is going to do if he gets into office.
Speaker 1: They're doing all the things that they accuse Trump of doing.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Openly. Openly.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, the the the sheer number of hoaxes that the Democratic Party is pushing over and over again, they and and look, I understand, like, politicians are gonna, you know, exaggerate, they're gonna misspeak, and they'll tell occasional, you know, untruths, whatever. That's that's how it is in politics. But when you have deliberate, concerted, repeated pushing of hoaxes, you're like, wait a second. Come on, man.
This is too this is too far.
Speaker 0: And you're supposed to be the good guys.
Speaker 1: You're supposed and you claim to be the good guys? I'm like, exactly.
Speaker 0: You're supposed to be the progressives.
Speaker 1: Yes. The Dems are like, oh, we're the good guys. We're the honest people. No. No.
Hang on. You can't claim to be the good guys. You can't claim to be the honest people if you're deliberately post pushing hoaxes that have been debunked thoroughly. Yeah. Well, Roger Even Snopes, which is a liberal thing, says us bogus.
Yeah. Like the fine people's hoax. Uh-huh.
Speaker 0: Obama just said that on stage.
Speaker 1: Just said that.
Speaker 0: I was like, what the flying he doesn't give a he doesn't give a they're just they're just they're just That's a goddamn lie. Flat out lie.
Speaker 1: Flat out lie. How about
Speaker 0: the other one where Kamala's campaign used what Trump was saying about protecting women and from illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 0: You remember that?
Speaker 1: That Yeah.
Speaker 0: What he was saying is that if the women like it or not, I'm gonna do it. Yeah. When he was saying that, they were trying to say that he was taking away women's right to choose, whether women like it or not. That's not what he was saying.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. He
Speaker 0: was literally talking about protecting them from dangerous people that are sneaking in through the border.
Speaker 1: Yes. Exactly. But they'll take, like like, not even a full sentence, like, a half a sentence from Yes. And then and then I'll push it on on every ad, every, you know, every speaking event, every meeting.
Speaker 0: Repeated on the news. Yes. This is what's crazy. They'll talk about it on these new shows. Quote new shows.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. I mean, I mean, a recent one that that came up, a lot of people reached out to me was, like, they're they're, like, oh, Trump says he wants to execute Liz Cheney. I'm, like, that is utter It's not what he said
Speaker 0: at all.
Speaker 1: It's not what he said at all. Here, what he's saying is that, look, if if Liz Cheney actually had to fight at the front lines, should think twice about going to war. Exactly. It's easy to go it's easy to go to war. It's easy to be a warmonger if you don't have to, you know, risk dying at the front lines.
If other basically, it's fucked up if if people are having fancy dinners in Washington DC while people are being slaughtered in trenches. You know, it's like you're not feeling the pain.
Speaker 0: Exactly.
Speaker 1: You're not taking the risk. It's someone else dying. Exactly. That's that's cruel and lacking in empathy. And and all Trump was saying was that Liz Cheney will be much less of a warmonger because she's a huge warmonger, just like her dad, if she actually had had to go to the front lines and fight herself.
Speaker 0: And meanwhile, they're saying that he should he's saying she should be shot.
Speaker 1: Yes. Which is a total lie.
Speaker 0: And But
Speaker 1: I had, like, tons of people call me this weekend saying, oh, Trump says he's gonna put Liz Cheney in a firing squad. Like, that is an outrageous lie. And legacy media ran with that lie big time.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's crazy. It's it's just wild to see. And if it wasn't for Twitter, I don't think we would know about all this stuff. I I think it would be very difficult for you.
I think YouTube throttled. They did something weird. They won't say what they did, but they did something weird with the Trump interview that I did Yeah. Where you couldn't find it.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make sense.
Speaker 0: It made no sense.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's like the it was like the biggest interview on Earth Yeah. And you can't find it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Not only that, it wasn't trending. Bull. It wasn't trending. It wasn't trending.
Speaker 1: It wasn't trending. It wasn't trending. It wasn't trending. It wasn't trending.
Speaker 0: It wasn't trending.
Speaker 1: Like, there's just no excuse for that, man.
Speaker 0: No excuse.
Speaker 1: There's no excuse.
Speaker 0: It was getting a 1,000,000 views. 1 point what was it? 1.4 an hour at one point in time? 1.5. 1.5 an hour.
Yeah. And it wasn't trending.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Like And it's like it's like it's like your channel is a known channel. It's not it's not like it was started yesterday. It's a Yeah. It's like this is a high trust yours is a high trust channel.
It's like you're not trying to sell scam crypto coins. So so
Speaker 0: Well, thank God we put it on x as well. Yeah. Yeah. Because I think just with your account and my account alone, that's 70,000,000 views.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, it's like you can't hide things anymore because of you. And if it wasn't for you, I think they would have had total control of social media by now.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: They would have they banned so many accounts during the pandemic, so many dissenting scientists and doctors and physicians. They banned so many conspiracy theorists, so many people that colored outside the lines. They would have done that everywhere, and it it probably would have I think even at what's going on at Facebook, they're they're being more lenient. You know, you hear Zuckerberg talking about taking a more libertarian stance. That's entirely reaction to the way Twitter has kinda moved the watermark.
Speaker 1: Exactly. As soon as as soon as any company steps out of line and is willing to actually have the truth debated on their platform, it forces the other platforms to allow things to be more truthful to to not censor because their censorship becomes glaringly obvious. Yes. Yes. And, you know, the the best thing I found for as a rebuttal, like, if somebody if there's a hoax, is just go to the source material.
You know? If if you think if somebody saying thinks, you know, you know, Trump said that that we should put Liz Cheney in a firing squad. I'm, like, let let let me send you a link to x so you can watch his video. That's the best way. Yes.
It's it's don't take my opinion for it. Don't take anyone's opinion for it. Go to the source material.
Speaker 0: And community notes.
Speaker 1: Yes. And community notes is awesome. Is the best. It's awesome.
Speaker 0: It's incredible. Yeah. Because everybody gets checked.
Speaker 1: Yes. Including me. Yeah. And with community notes, the all the software is open source and all the data is open source. So you can recreate any given note independently.
That's amazing. Yeah. That's how it's be
Speaker 0: that's how
Speaker 1: it should be. Total, absolute transparency in every way. You know, sometimes I get I get asked, oh, y'all can you remove a note? You know, mostly by the left, but sometimes by the right. I'm like I'm like, I don't even remove remove notes on my own count.
Nothing. And and and by the way, everything is totally open. So if I did that, it would stick out like a sore thumb Yeah. Immediately. Like, it's not gonna be subtle.
Speaker 0: That is the best counter to misinformation.
Speaker 1: Yes. Absolutely.
Speaker 0: Let everybody look at it and say, okay. Here's what the actual fact says.
Speaker 1: Yes. Exactly. The the counter to misinformation is better information.
Speaker 0: Not just that, but having it checked in real time by the community. So you have millions of people that can go over and debate whether or not this is true or that's true.
Speaker 1: Yes. And and just and I like I said, like, the the best way to understand the truth of things is don't take anyone's opinion for it. Look at the source material. So look at what someone actually said, look at what someone actually did, look at the real videos of the situation, and and then you can actually you'll know what's real. Especially on the Democrat side, they've been repeatedly saying that that the that the First Amendment is an obstacle.
And they're claiming, oh, the First Amendment is is is enabling dis disinformation, misinformation. And I'm like, yo, there's a reason for the First Amendment. Freedom of speech the reason they found out the country put, you know, the freedom of speech there is because they came from countries where if if you spoke your mind, you would get shot or imprisoned. That's why the First Amendment exists. And the Second Amendment is there to stop the tyranny of government.
The Second Amendment, the right to bear arms, is there to protect freedom of speech. You know? You know? And I I've had these debates, especially with people in LA, because they they're they're like, one take or one's guns away. And I'm like, yo, can you guarantee me that the government that we will never have a tyrannical government in the United States?
Can you can you make that guarantee? But, like, well, nobody can make that guarantee. I'm like, then we need to keep our guns because that's the that's what's gonna stop it.
Speaker 0: That sounds crazy for people to hear because they think about gun violence and gun problems and gun this and gun that, but that's the reality of the world that we live in is that tyranny is possible and it exists other places and it's slowly existing. It's slowly rearing its head in the UK. You're you're saying I I think the the number of people that have been arrested for just social media, posts is bananas. It's in the 1,000.
Speaker 1: Yes. Several thousand people have been have been given prison sentences in the UK for social media posts that where there was no explicit link to actual violence. But they just said it encouraged violence. Like, well, did anyone actually do anything as a result of that media post? Well, no.
But they they just and and then they have a prison overcrowding situation in the UK, so that they'll quite literally releasing convicted pedophiles and putting people in jail for Facebook posts. That's an actual thing happening in Britain. Like, it's you're, like, one
Speaker 0: of the It's so wild that people can't say.
Speaker 1: You know, is going on.
Speaker 0: And what's insane to me Make
Speaker 1: oil fiction again. Yeah. You know?
Speaker 0: But it's all being encouraged by the left. Ketanji Brown Jackson, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton. John Kerry
Speaker 1: was one of the people who said that the on camera, like, a few weeks ago, saying that the First Amendment is a prob is an obstacle to fighting misinformation.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's crazy. That's such a crazy thing to say when you have a solution in community notes. Yeah. You have a solution and something that that could clear everything up, any confusion within a day or 2.
Speaker 1: And and even without a community note, you can reply to a post and with with evidence that that that shows that the post is wrong. You don't even need community notes. I mean, community notes is helpful because it sticks to the original note. Yes. But in the replies, you can say, here's why you're wrong, here are the reasons, and here's the evidence.
Speaker 0: But the argument is that people are too unsophisticated, that they're not going to research these things. They're gonna be a victim of misinformation. So they're gonna read something that's incorrect. They're gonna run with it. People are gonna die.
People are gonna we're gonna ruin the world because people believed in misinformation. It's a stupid argument.
Speaker 1: It's a stupid argument.
Speaker 0: Because it's an argument that they're too dumb to know what's right or wrong. Yes. If you if you know, because you're saying it's misinformation. Why do you think that you're smarter than everybody who reads that?
Speaker 1: Exactly. And and obviously anyone on on the X system knows that the things were posted and then there are replies and there are the rebuttals and it's immediately corrected. But where are the corrections for the legacy media? Right. You know, when when if, you know, some broadcast media pop they they they they sit say false things all the time, but it's a one way street.
There's no rebuttal. There's no counter. Right. You know?
Speaker 0: This who's apologized for being incorrect about what did Rachel Maddow ever apologize for telling everybody that if you get the COVID vaccine, you're never gonna get COVID? It won't the virus stops
Speaker 1: with you? Never.
Speaker 0: Never. No one ever it's just it was not true at the time. There was no evidence to support it at the time. It's pure propaganda, and she said it, the Russiagate hoax. The for 3 years, they said that he was Putin's toy
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And that Putin had him compromised. The Steele dossier.
Speaker 1: The Steele dossier was completely fabricated by, a lawyer at Perkins Coie who was paid by the Clinton campaign. Literally.
Speaker 0: Crazy.
Speaker 1: And still people think the Russian hoax is real.
Speaker 0: And there's no repercussions.
Speaker 1: There's no
Speaker 0: one had to apologize. Hillary Clinton never came out and apologized for that and people still listen to her. The whole thing is crazy. And it's all coming from the left which growing up as a a person who's in the left my whole life, it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: Same. I was on the left until 3 years ago.
Speaker 0: It's not the left anymore.
Speaker 1: It's not the left anymore. It it just I think we obviously want I believe we want freedom. We want we wanna maximize post personal liberty. I think we want we wanna be kind to people, you know, we wanna have empathy, and but it's very important to have personal freedom and a merit based society. And the left is is wants to oppress your freedoms, especially freedom of speech, and they wanna they wanna have a non merit based society, you know, with race based and sex based preferences.
And I said, well, wait a second, no, we just want people to succeed based on their skills and their hard work.
Speaker 0: And if they don't want people to express themselves about particular issues then they're not doing the will of the people. If they're trying to suppress people's ability to communicate, they're only doing that because they wanna do things that people don't want them to do. Yes. And they wanna silence opposition. That's all it is.
And the fact that people can't see that and they wanna call Trump a fascist, Well, the whole thing is stages through the looking glass. It's just I mean,
Speaker 1: it's one hoax after another that that they're portraying as Trump. And if they try to call the the rally at Madison Square Gardens like a Nazi rally, I'm like, yo, there was, like, literally an Israeli flag in the audience. I think a quarter of the speakers were Jewish. There was, like, there were people of every race, color, creed, religion at that at that rally. Tell me, what about that is Nazi?
And yet it was portrayed as a Nazi rally in the sense
Speaker 0: Well, MSNBC, they they literally showed video of the Nazi rally from the 19 thirties and then compared it to the Trump rally. Now ignoring the fact that Jimmy Carter spoke there.
Speaker 1: There there have been dozens of political rallies at Madison Square Gardens. Dozens, on the on the Democrat side. People people on x were like, and here's exactly here's Jimmy Carter and here's Bill Clinton and here's wait a second. Actually, it looks like every presidential candidate has done a on the Democrat side has done a rally at Madison Square Garden. Are they Nazis too?
Speaker 0: But what they're doing is they're preying on low information voters who aren't engaged actively on social media, who don't have the time to look through everything and
Speaker 1: Exactly. Yeah. But people are living if if people are just on looking at legacy mainstream media, then they have a totally different world view than if they're on x and and seeing the the actual flow of argument Yes. And the actual evidence.
Speaker 0: Well, what was the pushback? What happened when you guys released the Twitter files? Because I think the Twitter files is probably one of the most important things in this age of information for understanding the influence that government has on social media and and on discourse. Because when when we found out that that was the case, that the government was actually asking Twitter to remove posts that were factual Yeah.
Speaker 1: All the time.
Speaker 0: They did the same thing to Facebook. They had them throttle pieces of one of Tucker Carlson's show. They they suppressed the views by 50% Yeah. Of factual information.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. There was there was massive government interference in Twitter, but but Twitter welcomed it. It that's important to all Twitter welcomed it. I mean, all Twitter was controlled by by far left activists.
They welcomed the government interference. The government they get paid by the government for it.
Speaker 0: That's crazy. They got paid for their time. Correct?
Speaker 1: Yeah. They got paid 1,000,000 of dollars for for suppressing information.
Speaker 0: So it's like bill
Speaker 1: and time much of it was, like, federal legal. The FBI had this, like, this this this sort of magic portal into the Twitter system and and the but all of the communication that that sort of in this portal was auto deleted after 2 weeks, which breaks federal FOIA laws. So we don't even know what was said because it was all deleted after 2 weeks.
Speaker 0: That's insane. Yeah. That's so crazy. It's so crazy that people thought that was okay.
Speaker 1: It's not super not okay.
Speaker 0: No. It's super not okay. It's unconstitutional and no one would want that. No one would want the government to have that kind of access. Exactly.
@DogRightGirl - Spitfire
I CANT BELIEVE @elonmusk HAS ANY INFLUENCE ON POLITICIANS!!!!!! How DARE he!! https://t.co/iaL6NpbdmE
@KylieJaneKremer - Kylie Jane Kremer
Democrat Senator Chris Murphy accuses Elon Musk of doing a "Heil Hitler" salute at Trump's rally and gets shut down by UN Ambassador Nominee Elise Stefanik during her Senate hearing today. @elonmusk should sue the hell out of @ChrisMurphyCT https://t.co/KuZibctaFy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk did not perform any salutes at the rally. He is a visionary who supports the U.S. space program and aims to improve government efficiency. The American people recognize his contributions and support successful entrepreneurs.
Concerns were raised about reactions from right-wing commentators and extremist groups who interpreted a visual from the rally as a neo-Nazi salute. However, the focus should be on combating antisemitism, which has surged recently. The intention is to bring moral clarity to the role at the United Nations and to continue condemning antisemitism, emphasizing President Trump's strong leadership in this area.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think of Elon Musk, perhaps the president's most visible adviser, doing, 2 Heil Hitler salutes last night at the president's televised rally?
Speaker 1: No. Elon Musk did not do those salutes. I was not at the rally, but I can tell you I've been at many rallies with Elon Musk who loves to cheer when president Trump says we need to send, you know, our US space program to Mars. Elon Musk is a visionary. I'm looking forward to his work in DOSH, the Department of Government Efficiency and look forward to looking how we can be more efficient and effective, but that is simply not the case.
And to say so is the the American people are smart. They see through it. They support Elon Musk. We are proud to be the country of such successful entrepreneurs. That is one of our greatest strengths as Americans.
Speaker 0: Let me share with you what a few Americans have said about it. Evan Kilgore, a right wing political commentator, wrote on x, holy crap. Did Elon Musk just hile Hitler at the Trump inauguration rally? This is incredible. We are so back.
Andrew Torba, who's the founder of the right wing Christian nationalist social platform, GAB, said incredible things are happening, as he, as he amplified the visual. The Proud Boys chapter in Ohio posted the clip on a Telegram channel with the text, Hyle Trump, a chapter of the white nationalist group, White Lives Matter, posted it on Telegram. Thanks for hearing us, Elon. The white flame will rise again. I could keep going.
Over and over last night, white supremacist groups and neo Nazi groups in this country, rallied around that visual. Does it concern you that those elements of the neo Nazi and white supremacist element in the United States believe that what they saw last night was a Neo Nazi salute.
Speaker 1: What concerns me is this is what you these are the questions you believe are most important to ask to the UN ambassador. I have a very strong record when it comes to combating antisemitism. We just had a historic election where President Trump earned historic support from American voters because of his strong leadership combating antisemitism, which has been a scourge across the country skyrocketing since October 7th. So I intend to bring moral clarity to this position and continue to speak out as a voice, as a, beacon of light, condemning antisemitism at the United Nations.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Watch Queen Of The Morons- AOC- Claim That Elon Musk Is Stupid Alex Jones Responds With A Hysterical Breakdown Comparing Musk's Intelligence With Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez This Is MUST-WATCH/SHARE! » LIVE X STREAM: https://t.co/C4QlEaHO30
Video Transcript AI Summary
This billionaire lacks intelligence and expertise, evident in decisions like appointing inexperienced individuals to key positions. The danger lies in their ignorance, which could lead to disastrous outcomes. AOC, despite her confidence, merely regurgitates talking points and lacks true understanding, making her a source of unintentional comedy. The media's portrayal of issues often misleads the public, promoting harmful ideas. Real intelligence encompasses a range of attributes beyond IQ, including moral conscience and practical wisdom. AOC's charisma is overshadowed by her lack of depth, while Elon Musk embodies innovation and success. Support for independent media is crucial in combating misinformation and promoting truth. Products that enhance health and well-being are available, emphasizing the importance of informed choices over harmful alternatives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This dude is probably one of the most unintelligent billionaires I have ever met or seen or witnessed. Which, you know, you could probably even glean that from watching these people on TV. Anyways, all of that is to say is that they don't do their homework. Clearly, like, they're putting 19 year olds in at the treasury. This dude is not smart.
And, and the danger in not in the lack of intelligence and the lack of expertise, that Elon has. I mean, this guy is one of the most morally vacant, but also
Speaker 1: just
Speaker 0: least knowledgeable about these systems that
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: We really know of.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh.
Speaker 0: But the point is is that what that means is that they're going to hit a button inevitably. They're going to hit a button, and things can go side
Speaker 1: what they're saying is when anything goes wrong, they're gonna blame it on this. I know you're the button that went wrong. And I could talk for an hour about everything she said there. Bunch of young people. Yeah.
All the best super brains he's got. He's donating into this. And, boy, these dumbasses are sure kicking your ass, sweetheart, in your little pedo party. AOC is a very dim bulb, and it's sad. But they're still in God's perfection that God creates a beauty for us in
Speaker 2: her
Speaker 1: totally unself aware, sadly moronic consciousness. Because she's so happy in this video, she's feeling so powerful. She's actually believing that she's smarter than Elon Musk. All she does is regurgitate talking points and act confident. It's all a facade, but in that is beauty.
God takes evil and makes it produce good. As in an instruction to us, do not be like AOC. And, of course, do not be like Chuck Schumer who on a charisma scale is a zero. Reminds me of the former who was the last mayor, the communist one. He's like, I've got a burger.
Take the shot. Mom, good burger. Yeah. Bill de Blasio. I mean, that guy's got a zero on the orator scale.
He has zero charisma. I will that's an intelligence scale. I will give AOC that she has some charisma, and it's hilarious. Because just like Kamala Harris has a little charisma, it goes up and down from zero charisma to a little bit of charisma. It looks like a light bulb that has no light in it.
Kind of going. But not with AOC. Oh, no. No. No.
No. She just has blazing stupidity. The government hears Alex Jones who has the largest audience in the country, bigger than any of the, networks, the biggest megaphone in the country.
Speaker 0: The deep state hates Alex Jones with a vengeance.
Speaker 1: Alex Jones is the most extraordinary person I've ever met. Let's get started with some fun. That's also very illustrative of our enemies' mindsets, which when you see their confidence and you see the corporate media's glitz and glamour, and you believe that, well, maybe they're right. Maybe two men can have a baby. Maybe maybe fentanyl isn't a problem.
Maybe World War three is a good thing. Maybe maybe drag queen story time isn't such a bad idea. May maybe maybe they are gonna give us a utopia. Maybe maybe we should just do what they say. Maybe communism works.
Maybe we should open our borders. Maybe white people are inherently evil and need to be gotten rid of. Maybe eating bugs is a good idea. I mean, it's not just a reasonable, you know, thing to not go along with it. I mean, they're reasonable guys.
Let's do it. And and when you're under the spell that I've never been under, thank God, but some people many people been under, and you come out of the spell, you come out of the trance, you come out of the mind control, you come out of the Stockholm syndrome and learned helplessness, and you say, what the hell is going on here? And then you get our sweet little darling, the barista, the bartender. I think it's bartenders. I mean, there's a lot of smart ones actually, but taken and put up by the establishment because she's such a mindless vessel that will execute things like a animatronic giggling robot.
And she said a lot of hilarious stuff over the years. Remember? Every time I mentioned, I wanna find the video and play it again. She's like she puts on a fake, I guess, Hispanic accent. She she never talked that before.
Speaker 2: And she goes, we have these community gardens, and there's too much cauliflower grown there that the white people eat. We need other things grown, not the white people food.
Speaker 1: And what the hell does cauliflower have to do with white people? By the way, cauliflower is from Africa, but it's white. I remember even the New York Times writers years ago were like, milk might be racist. And they went in trying to explain it. So you just see everything and feel, oh my god.
Everything's evil. Cows are evil. Their farting's gonna kill the earth, and they we gotta cut the trees down, Bill Gates said. And they're they're carbon too. And you're the carbon now.
They came out last year and said, well, humans are bad. We we put off methane too. They listed carbon dioxide as a pollutant, and that's what we exhale and plants breathe. So, you you know, the magnitude of the wall of fraud every few years. Oh, by next year, the ice caps will be totally melted.
They're bigger than ever. Why white supremacists are chugging milk? The New York Times. Then another New York Times said, why asking questions is bad? That's almost as crazy as Carrie a few times last year saying, we gotta cut off half the farm production in the world or people will starve.
Acts oh, the white supremacist origins of exercise. That's another gold mine. But children are designed, especially in large instructional groups, it triggers epigenetics when they would be gathered around the campfires by the elders throughout our human experience. It's a ritual. Means it's epigenetic.
It's in your DNA. Everybody gets around and somebody gets up and teaches how to hunt or teaches about how to fight or teaches how to build a fire or tells you about the elders and the and the stories of the people. Those are special times in the tribe. So the children all get gathered together, and then they have some big fat man in a clown outfit say, I'm a woman. I'm your mommy now.
Let me groom you. Come sit on my lap. I have an erection. I'm a convicted pedophile. So the children don't know.
They go in and say, we're gonna play different roles today. You're little boys and girls, but now the boys will be girls and the girls will be boys. And then they say, do you feel like you're a girl now? Yes. I feel like I'm a girl now.
Well, we're gonna put you in a secret program. In a few years, cut your penis off. Of course, they don't tell you that. That's not diabolical or anything. So they they they try to keep us in a childlike state of rest of development where they're the instructors, and they're the authorities, and they're the experts, and they're the bosses, and they're the guardians, and they're the moral people.
And you've gotta do everything they say, or you're just gonna be a bad person, and we're gonna give you a social credit score, and I'll let you buy or sell or have a job or live. If you don't do it, we say, because we're liberal and loving. And then you get AOC, in one of her latest or latest fabulous comedy saying, quote, Elon Musk is one of the most unintelligent billionaires I've ever met or seen. And the poster said Who's gonna tell her? I said in response to reposting it on acts at real Alex Jones, the globalist would hate it if you follow me and share the videos and articles.
That might hurt the globalist a little more. Don't do that. Please don't. Elon Musk is the most intelligent person on the planet when it comes to wide spectrum knowledge and force of will. AOC is one of the most unself aware people on Earth, but also one of the greatest unintentional comics in history.
Now let me unpack that before I play the clip. The average Libtard is taught one spectrum analysis, not even third dimensional understanding or first level responses or issues. They're certainly not taught second level consequences or third level or fourth level, or they tell there's not even a third or fourth level if they studied it. Because they're designed and brainwashed and put in a position of being automatomics or automatons. Metropolis style biological androids, regurgitators, puppets that parrot what they're told.
So they will say, oh, Jones is an academic. He just said Elon is intelligent on the force of will scale. They don't even know that real intelligence is not quantified by a simple IQ test. That is only one approximation of a spectrum of the educational systems labels, but he does have a very high acuity on that scale or that gauge. Real intelligence is having a conscience, having innate programming God gave you to have a conscience.
That is one of the most important forms of intelligence. Then there's the intelligence to be able to appreciate beauty. Then there is musical intelligence, mathematical intelligence, aesthetic intelligence, linguistic intelligence, physical intelligence, which a high capacity fast moving brain, it's physical, but it's also the body's physical intelligence. The cells, your immune systems. You have a great immune system that has a high intelligence and high energy electrochemical operation.
And so I've told you a thousand times a thousand, the most powerful people have wide spectrum intelligence, and then they apply it to real world events and street smarts and trial and error. That's why Musk says with his managers that he commands, his generals, I wanna be told what they really think. I wanna know about the problems now. I wanna be challenged. I don't wanna be in an echo chamber.
That is stagnancy. A rotting green sludge pit with rats crawling around the edge and leeches flirting about in the mud. No. We love beautiful, fast moving crystal clear water, transparency, purity, enlightenment, electricity. So AOC is a very dim bulb, and it's sad.
But they're still in God's perfection that God creates a beauty for us in her totally unself aware, sadly moronic consciousness because she's so happy in this video. She's feeling so powerful. She's actually believing that she's smarter than Elon Musk. All she does is regurgitate talking points and act confident. It's all a facade, but in that is beauty.
God takes evil and makes it produce good. As in an instruction to us, do not be like AOC. And, of course, do not be like Chuck Schumer who on a charisma scale is a zero. Reminds me of the former who was the last mayor, the communist one. He's like, I've got a burger.
Take the shop. Mom, good burger. Yeah. Bill de Blasio. I mean, that guy's got a zero on the orator scale.
He has zero charisma. I will that's an intelligence scale. I will give AOC that she has some charisma, and it's hilarious. Because just like Kamala Harris has a little charisma, it goes up and down from zero charisma to a little bit of charisma. It looks like a light bulb that has no light in it kinda going, but not with AOC.
Oh, no. No. No. No. She just has blazing stupidity.
Here, let's accuse Elon for outstretching his hand to a crowd and saying from my heart to you, and let's say it's Hitler, and let's not go check if we've done that a thousand times. That's low intelligence. I'm gonna attack somebody for what they've said or done. Hey. First, I go, well, do I agree with them?
So I'm not gonna attack them. I think it's right. But they're they're deceptive. So so they'll they'll they'll attack somebody even though they've said the same thing before. They won't even think that I ever say that before they tell a lie.
Gee, can I get away with this lie? That's what they they don't even ask that. They're just running around lying constantly. I mean, sometimes I'll have a lie pop in my head, and I'll go, that's not a thought for me. Why would I tell that lie?
I was driving on the car and stuff. These dirty tricks were popping in my head. I was like, well, I didn't I didn't initiate that in my cerebral cortex. What is that? Nope.
Oh, but look how good the good this would be. I'm like, nope. Are you on my shoulders, Satan? Get off there. But imagine these people, they really think lying's cool.
But lying only works when people are asleep. It doesn't work anymore when people are awake. So I got a lot to cover, but let's move on here. Let me play the clip. But the disconnectedness, the tone deafness to look at somebody who in everything he's done has succeeded, innovated, mavericks, maverick, trailblazer of trailblazers.
I mean, taken down, just mailing the federal government, taken on the globalist mafia point blank range, lightning speed, supercharging Trump, taking over x, removing 80% of the employees, 85 or whatever it was, Executing, succeeding, innovating. The rocketry. More innovation the entire eighty years before it, At least about a hundred of of of of rocketry, aeronautics, engineering, thirty three story giant boosters landing with huge robot arms one year after he says, I want a robot arm. Because they're like, well, we we have to put giant legs on it, and that gives a lot of weight. And he goes, I just have a just have an arm grab it.
Because all our other spacecraft, you'd have the little legs come out, which people theorized a hundred fifty years ago. Now we have. Now we actually tried to do it like Musk did. Like, no. We'll just have a giant robot arm.
How's that sound? And then he's got the platform and has built at a certain point. You see, he's been building all this success and this infrastructure, and then it gets to a certain point like a rocket on launchpad where And see, that's what I told you on election day and when we won. I said, this is primary ignition, Houston. Starbase Texas launch.
We are in a launch mode. Now it got off the launch pad. It's at 30,000 feet. Billing was going 10,000 miles an hour last week. Now it's going 20,000 miles an hour.
Escape velocity. It it it's amazing. And then all oh, best selling electric cars. But it was super innovation, lots more satellites than everybody else in all of history combined in just a few years. And they work great.
I got couple of Starlinks. And they get better and better all the time. First, put them in a few years ago, worked okay out in the country, got what I needed done. About a year later, that's really fast now. Now it's like, god almighty.
This is badass. Game changer. And it goes on and on and on, and we're supposed to recognize brilliance. We're supposed to get behind it when it's behind us. But no.
No. No. She doesn't go, oh, maybe I should work for this team. She's so stupid. Because if she was smart and evil, she'd roll over.
But no. Because she's dumb. Dumber than a box of hangers. The only intelligence she has is a little bit of charisma. That's it.
That's all. And not ugly, but she's so stupid. She's really ugly to me. I I'm super gorgeous women, and then I found out they're liberals. It's just like it's I mean, it's like, you are gross, lady.
You have a woman that's not classically physically attractive but smart. I'm just like, wow. Talk about sexy. That brain. Alright.
Let's hear from this sad creature Hirdesh.
Speaker 0: This dude is probably one of the most unintelligent billionaires I have ever met or seen or witnessed. Yeah. You know, you could probably even glean that from watching these people on TV. Anyways, all of that is to say is that they don't do their homework. Clearly, like, they're putting 19 year olds in at the treasury.
This dude is not smart. And, and the danger in not in the lack of intelligence and the lack of expertise, that Elon has. I mean, this guy is one of the most morally vacant, but also just least knowledgeable about these systems that
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: We really know of.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh.
Speaker 0: But the point is is that what that means is that they're going to hit a button inevitably. They are going to hit a button, and things can go side
Speaker 1: what they're saying is when anything goes wrong, they're gonna blame it on this. I know you're the button that went wrong. And I could talk for an hour about everything she said there. Bunch of young people. Yeah.
All the best super brains he's got. He's donating into this. And, boy, these dumbasses are sure kicking your ass, sweetheart, and your little pedo party and PDD and all of them. So I'm gonna stop there. You don't get this information without supporting journalists and independent media that are delivering.
The rebel delivers it. Tucker Carlson delivers it. Elon Musk has the biggest megaphone. We you supported Trump. He got in there.
Infowars needs your support. Alright? We are winning. We are dominating. We're reaching over a hundred million views a day just on Nexolon, four hundred radio stations, but I'm fighting the Democrat party law firm, the main one with Hillary and all of them, Aiken Gump, the ones that sued Trump, the ones that sued Giuliani, the ones they they spent 326,000,000 in federal filings two months ago in the last seven years trying to shut me down.
If I spent the time with the filings, the suits, the attacks, but we're now beating them on every front because I've got good lawyers and we we're going after them. So that is the cost of us staying on air and fighting. Okay? We would have have zero financial issues if we weren't spending 70% of the funds beating them. And if I had even more funds, we'd beat them quicker.
So we're not selling bugs. We're selling concentrated known superfoods like Irish sheamass, the strongest out there, incredible effects, the strongest turmeric formula with concentrate, the strongest you're gonna get of not just turmeric, but of ginger, black pepper extract. It's an incredible thing, not just for your immune system and inflammation. My skin is glowing. Why am I so healthy?
I'm gobbling these supplements. The AlexJonesstore.com. And, again, bugs are toxic. They're they're they're they're exoskeleton. Chitin is a known carcinogen.
So there's a lot to this. Well, we need your support so we don't eat the bugs, literally. So we're fighting on every front. The AlexJonesstore.com. There's a big sale going that ends Monday right now to 40% off on top of the sales.
Become a VIP member for $30 a month, cancel anytime, and get $40 a month instead of the store plus special deals, special offers, and special products only available to VIP members. Everybody become a VIP member. The alexjonesstore.com funding the second American revolution and winning worldwide.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
"Nobody elected your ass! This is not Elon Musk's country!" - Rep Maxine Waters goes on an unhinged rant attacking Elon Musk at the anti-Elon rally. All this drama because Americans simply asked what our tax dollars are funding. https://t.co/tNRwfAKNPi
Video Transcript AI Summary
California, we need to address Elon Musk. Nobody elected him to control our private information or payments. He's profited enough from our government and now wants to dictate how we manage our finances. We must protect our federal employees and assert that this is our country, not Musk's or Trump's. The billionaire class is trying to dominate and profit at our expense, but we will not allow it. They are creating cryptocurrency to enrich themselves, not to benefit the people. We must stand firm, regardless of the weather, and demand decent jobs and respect. Musk won't even meet with local officials, showing his disregard for the community. We cannot be intimidated; when the people fight, we win. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: California. Hello, everybody. We have convened here in the right place, the Treasury Department. We have got to tell Elon Musk nobody elected your ass. Nobody told you you could get all of our private information.
Nobody told you you could be in charge of the payments of this country. We have told you you've made enough money off our government yourself. And now you wanna take everybody else's payroll and make sure that they don't make the kind of money that you have made. Oh, you wanna use our money to go to Mars? No.
We wanna use our money right here in Washington, DC, in this country. We wanna make sure that all of our federal employees are protected. We've got to make sure that you know and understand nobody elected you. You think you're the pro president of The United States Of America, the co president that can take over, go into our private payment system, and do whatever you wanna do. You got another thought coming.
We're gonna stop you right now. Ladies and gentlemen, we're at a crisis in this country. We're having in a crisis in this country because Trump and Elon Musk and the billionaires have decided they're gonna put us all in our place. They're gonna run this country. They're gonna make sure that they take over everything.
Are we gonna let them do that? Are we gonna let them run this government in the way that they can make even more money? And so they won't stop. It is so brazen. Every day, they're taking new actions.
They're taking executive actions. Every day, they're doing something. Do you know that Trump and the billionaire class have created more cryptocurrency? Do you know that that cryptocurrency is not a donation? It's not an investment.
It's going into their pockets. Do you understand that the moneymakers are in charge, they think. But when the people decide that we're not going to be trumped on, that we're not gonna be walked on, that we're not gonna be stomped on, that we're not gonna allow them to control our lives and push us out that when they understand that, we will win. That's it. That's it.
We've got to be prepared to be out here no matter how cold it is, no matter if it's the rain, no matter if it's snowing, we've got to be here. This is our country. This is not Elon Musk's country. This is not Trump's country. This is our country.
We deserve to have decent jobs. We deserve to have the respect. We deserve to be treated in a way that all Americans should be treated. And so let me just tell you now. I have Elon Musk's major office in my district.
He won't even meet with the local elected officials. He said he was gonna tunnel under from his office all the way to the airport so he didn't have to be among, the need for people on the ground to get to the airport. He is a low down dirty, no good person along with Trump that cannot be trusted, and we must not be afraid of them again. When the people fight We win. When the people fight We win.
When the people say that you'd better see us because we damn sure see you. Thank you very much. Go ahead. Thank you. Thank you.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Rep Maxine Waters is currently have an unhinged meltdown over Elon Musk: “Elon Musk, where are you?! Bring your ass over here! We're not afraid of you... He's a thief! He's a gangster!" https://t.co/57DAh3YiEQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Wow! Look at this crowd! We're at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a crucial agency created by Dodd-Frank reforms. Before this, consumers had nowhere to turn when big banks cheated them, especially regarding student loans. Elon Musk wants to dismantle this—why? Because he’s a thief, a gangster, and he and his billionaire buddies want to take over the country. Trump even said you can buy your way into power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. Wow. Look at this crowd. Elon Musk, where are you?
Bring your ass over here so you can see who's here and what we're doing. We're not afraid of you. We know that you are the co president now of The United States Of America. But ladies and gentlemen, I want you to follow very closely what he's doing and how he has done it. First of all, we're here at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
What is it? This is so important. Prior to this being, organized in the Dodd Frank reforms, consumers didn't have any place to really file complaints. They didn't have anywhere to go when the biggest banks in America was ripping them off. The student loans were being undermined.
They didn't have any place to go. Why does Elon Musk wanna get rid of all of this? Because he's a thief. He's a gangster. He brings his billionaire friends along with him because they think that they can take over this country.
And Trump has said, you give me enough money, you can have
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
“Trump and Elon with his kid giving a press conference is odd” Same people https://t.co/gzfTty9bHp
@KoryYeshua - Kory Yeshua
Democrat congresswoman Maxine Waters says the quiet part out loud when talking about Trump and Elon. https://t.co/tzi6l5gmhB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The left is not worried about democracy, they are worried about being exposed. All the shady things they've been doing in the dark with American tax dollars is about to come to light. If they had nothing to hide, they wouldn't be going so crazy about it.
A defensive reaction to an accusation can indicate guilt. We're seeing a bunch of guilty politicians complaining after Elon Musk has been going into the books and finding hundreds of millions of our tax dollars going to nonsense. Just yesterday, we saw Elon talking about investigating federal employees who have a high net worth despite low pay. For many years, many people were afraid of the government. Now the tables are turning and the government is afraid of the people. It's all coming out now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The people of this country are being violated because all of our privacy is being taken up by, Elon Musk and Trump, and we don't know what all they have on us. We don't know what all they have on us.
Speaker 1: That, my fellow Americans, is what we like to call a Freudian slip, which is when you unintentionally reveal your subconscious feelings. Democrats aren't freaking out about Trump and Elon Musk because they're trying to protect democracy. They're freaking out because all the dirt they've been doing in the dark is about to come to light. And the American people are about to find out just how corrupt many of these politicians actually are. They want Elon to go away because he's exposing what exactly it is that they've been doing with American tax dollars.
They had nothing to hide, they wouldn't be going as ballistic as they are. There's an old American expression that says a hit dog will holler, which means a defensive reaction to an accusation can indicate guilt. And right now, what are we seeing? A bunch of hit dogs hollering after Elon's been going into the books and finding our tax dollars going to a bunch of crap, and we're talking about in the hundreds of millions. And just yesterday, we saw Elon talking about Doge investigating federal employees who have a high net worth despite low pay.
And, oh, boy, these politicians are really losing it. See, for many years, many people were afraid of the government. And now the tables are turning and the government is afraid of the people. Yeah. It's all coming out now.
And we're about to find out just exactly what it is that they have on politicians like you.
@america - America
President Trump discusses how legacy media attempted and failed to drive he and Elon Musk apart. https://t.co/Qo1hP5wlxH
Video Transcript AI Summary
The media and punditry threw everything they had at me, but they didn't win. Now they want to drive a wedge between Elon and me, even suggesting I've ceded control of the presidency to him.
But it's so obvious what they're doing. They're not even good at it. If they were, I never would have become president. I get 98% bad publicity, but the people are smart. They see what's happening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Aware, you have to be keenly aware that the media and and the punditry class, not that you know, I think you've proven they have no power anymore, because they threw everything they had at you, and they didn't win. And that was, you know, the New York Times, Washington Post, three networks, every late night comedy show, two cable channels. They they just threw they threw everything, lawfare, weaponization. And now I see they want you two to start they they want a divorce. They want you two to start hating each other, and they try oh, President Elon Musk, for example.
You do know that they're doing that to you.
Speaker 1: Oh, I see it all the time. They they tried it, then they stopped. That wasn't they have many different things, of hatred. Actually, Elon called me. He said, you know, they're trying to drive us apart.
I said, absolutely. No. They said, we have breaking news. Donald Trump has ceded control of the presidency to Elon Musk. President Musk will be attending a cabinet meeting tonight at 08:00.
And I say Yeah. It's just so obvious. They're so bad at it. I used to think they were good at it. They're actually bad at it because if they were good at it, I'd never be president.
Because I I think nobody in history has ever gotten more bad publicity than me. I could do the greatest things. I get 98% bad publicity. I could do outside of you
Speaker 0: and a
Speaker 1: few of your very good friends. Right. It's like the craziest thing. But you know what I have learned, Elon? The people are smart.
They get it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They do actually.
Speaker 1: They get it. They really see what's happening. Yes.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently watched a heated debate on CNN where I challenged Dr. Paul Offit on his financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry while discussing vaccine safety. I highlighted how conflicts of interest undermine public trust and questioned the focus on measles over pressing health issues like obesity and chronic disease. Despite Offit's assertions about vaccine safety, I argued that the media often overlooks critical health concerns. The segment ended abruptly, showcasing how mainstream media struggles when confronted with challenging viewpoints.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Calley Means Stuns CNN Viewers With Two Devastating Takedowns Live on Air Paul Offit and Pamela Brown came prepared for a debate. What they received was a reckoning. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/iUBRquJ8Hf
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Calley Means (@CalleyMeans), ex-pharma consultant turned industry critic, came out swinging on CNN Wednesday in a fiery debate against infamous vaccine pusher Dr. Paul Offit. Offit thought he could call RFK Jr. an anti-vaxxer without his own financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry being exposed—but he was wrong. Things immediately got heated when Means exposed Offit’s shocking conflicts of interest on live TV while CNN’s Pamela Brown stood by and let it happen like a deer caught in headlights. “What’s causing distrust in public health authorities is conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking millions of dollars from pharmaceutical makers like Merck while approving and recommending pharmaceuticals on ACIP committees. “Dr. Offit says that science is always settled when he himself has approved vaccines that have been recalled for causing organ failure in kids. “Dr. Offit is talking about measles… But there were 300 deaths from measles a year before the invention of the vaccine. We have 38% of children right now with prediabetes. Bobby is focused on that. He’s focused on reorganizing the department. And that’s what we should be talking about, not this distraction,” Means argued.
Video Transcript AI Summary
What's causing distrust in public health isn't the idea of public health itself, but the actions of its leaders. We need to address the conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking millions from pharmaceutical companies while approving their products.
It's also about holding people accountable when they make definitive statements about science, yet have approved products, like vaccines, that have later been recalled for causing harm.
While measles is important, let's remember that before the vaccine, there were 300 deaths a year from measles. Today, we have a much bigger problem, with 38% of children having prediabetes. It is important that we focus on reorganizing the department to address issues like this, instead of being distracted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trust in public health. No. It it it's the public health leaders themselves. It's people defending with the record that's happening to health at HHS. Why cuts are bad?
Of course, we should make cuts. Of course, the personnel should be changed. What's causing distrust in public health authorities is conflict of interest, like doctor Offutt taking millions of dollars from pharmaceutical makers like Merck while approving and recommending pharmaceuticals on ACIP committees. It's the fact that doctor Offutt's saying that science is always settled, when he himself has approved vaccines that have been recalled for causing organ failure for kids. And it's the fact that doctor Offit is talking about measles, which is important.
And I wanna be clear, Hamel. I don't wanna get this out. It's important. But there were three hundred deaths from measles a year before the invention of the vaccine. We have thirty eight percent of children right now having prediabetes.
Bobby is focused on that. He's focused on reorganizing the department, and that's what we should be talking about, not this distraction.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@calleymeans After Offit finished uncomfortably smiling during Means’ rebuke, he responded to the claims, saying, “I don’t have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company.” https://t.co/Z2KBFVNh7P
Video Transcript AI Summary
I serve on the FDA's vaccine advisory committee because I don't have relationships with pharmaceutical companies, which is a requirement. I actually agree with some of the concerns raised, such as obesity rates, chronic illnesses, and overmedication of children. I even wrote a book about the excesses of modern medicine. However, I strongly disagree with the claim that vaccines are harmful, as RFK Jr. suggests. RFK Jr. continues to falsely claim that vaccines cause autism, and he's now targeting childhood vaccines, which will ultimately harm children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Made a lot of claims there. I want you to respond to that. And we should note, you are a member of the FDA vaccine advisory committee, and you recently told CNN that RFK junior will hurt America's vaccine infrastructure. So please respond to that and tell us
Speaker 1: And, Pamela, I hope we can disclose his I hope we can disclose his millions of dollars of pharmaceutical payments while serving in that committee.
Speaker 0: Okay. Doctor Offit, please go ahead and respond.
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, you're not allowed to serve on the FDA's vaccine advisory committee if you have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company. And so because I don't have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company, I'm able to serve on that committee. Secondly, and most importantly, actually, the things that that, that Cali talks about, I actually agree with in some ways. I think that we are, for example, more obese as a country than than we should be. And that the consequence of obesity like hypertension and type two diabetes, I think we do have, in many ways, more chronic illnesses.
I think we overmedicate our children. I think there's many things we can do better. I actually wrote a book called Overkill When Modern Medicine Goes Too Far. So I agree with all that. What I don't agree with is that in any way, vaccines are are, harmful as RFK Jr says.
I mean, RFK Jr continues to claim that vaccines cause autism when they don't. He's now made childhood vaccines a major target of this. And and that's that's, only gonna be to the detriment of children.
Speaker 0: Hold on. No. No. Callie Callie, I have to let doctor Offit speak. This has to be a civil respectful conversation in order for this to work and for Americans, peep viewers to to soak this up.
So I wanna let Doctor Offit finish and then I'll go to you, Callie, I promise. Go ahead Doctor Offit.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
But Means later questioned: “Is it appropriate for a member of a government advisory committee (ACIP) to have a $1.5 million salary paid by Merck and receive millions in pharma royalties while he’s issuing guidance on products those companies make?” https://t.co/uSf5aMFZoL
@calleymeans - Calley Means
Is it appropriate for a member of a government advisory committee to have a $1.5 million salary paid by Merck and receive millions in pharma royalties while he’s issuing guidance on products those companies make? https://t.co/Slm88xdWyH
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Offit went on to say that he doesn’t know what the cause of autism is, mentioning several “interesting” theories. However, he stated with certainty that vaccines are “the one thing that doesn’t cause autism.” “Vaccines, I think, are really the safest, best-tested things that we give to children,” Offit said.
Video Transcript AI Summary
RFK Jr. continues to falsely claim that vaccines cause autism, and he's made childhood vaccines a major target. This is dangerous and will lead to the death of children.
When RFK Jr. says we have more chronic diseases in children than ever before, he's citing the instance of autism spectrum disorder. There are many interesting causes of autism spectrum disorder, like the infant microbiome, genetics, or medicines that pregnant people take during their pregnancy. But by focusing on childhood vaccines, he's focusing on the one thing that doesn't cause autism.
Vaccines are really the safest, best-tested things that we give to children, and that's what is making America healthy. To focus on vaccines as a target and claim that they're causing harm when they're not is only a detriment to America's children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I don't agree with is that in any way, vaccines are are, harmful as RFK Jr. Says. I mean, RFK Jr. Continues to claim that vaccines cause autism when they don't. He's now made childhood vaccines a major target of this.
And and that's that's, only gonna be for the death of children. Hold on.
Speaker 1: No. No. Callie Callie, I have to let doctor Offit speak. This has to be a civil respectful conversation in order for this to work and for Americans viewers to to soak this up. So I wanna let doctor Offit finish, and then I'll go to you, Cali.
I promise. Go ahead, doctor Offit.
Speaker 0: So I I think that when, for example, he says we have more chronic diseases in children than ever before, he says that the instance is one in thirty six. Well, that's the instance of autism spectrum disorder. There's a lot of interesting, cause or causes of autism spectrum disorder, like the infant microbiome or genetic or, medicines that women or pregnant people can take during their pregnancy. That's interesting. But by focusing on childhood vaccines, he's focusing on the one thing that doesn't cause autism.
And so vaccines, I think, are really the safest, best tested things that we give to children, and that's what make is making America healthy again. And I think to focus on vaccines as as a target and and claim that they're causing harms when they're not is only a detriment to America's children.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The next disaster for CNN unfolded when host Pamela Brown asked @CalleyMeans a vaccination question that completely backfired. Means flipped the script, using her question to highlight how the media obsesses over “measles” instead of focusing on health concerns that truly matter. PAMELA BROWN: “Is now a time to promote vaccines... especially among children who are being impacted by measles in places like Texas and in these six states where, according to health officials, they are unvaccinated?" CALLEY MEANS: “Pamela, with respect, why aren’t you asking me about the fact that 50% of teens have obesity? There are breathless segments being run and seen on [infectious disease] day after day after day, Pamela. It’s breathless coverage of five measles cases. “Why aren’t we asking why 16% of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans when we’re only 4% of the world population? Because the CDC said our immune system—no, it is related, Pamela. And let me say why: because the entire coverage of Bobby Kennedy is around measles. “The Democrats said the word ‘measles’ 25 times in the first hearing and said the words ‘obesity,’ ‘diabetes,’ and ‘chronic disease’ zero times. The HHS priority document under President Biden said the word ‘equity’ 25 times, said the word ‘vaccines’ countless times, and did not say the word ‘obesity’ or ‘diabetes.’ “There is a problem right now because this is not zero-sum. We are focused on a very small subset that’s important—we need good infectious disease management. Bobby Kennedy, Dr. Offit, is not correct. Bobby Kennedy has said one thing about vaccines and one thing only: that they should be studied like any other product. “Dr. Offit, on the ACIP committee, has recommended vaccines that have ended up being recalled for causing mass issues to kids. Bobby Kennedy has written multiple books, not about being anti-vax, but about having good science. And Dr. Offit is calling him anti-vaccine for literally just saying we need studies. “Bobby Kennedy is not concerned with measles. He wants good policies with measles. He wants to attack the 92% of deaths in the United States, which is chronic conditions,” Means said.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Why is everyone so focused on measles when so many other health issues plague our country? The media breathlessly covers five measles cases while ignoring the obesity epidemic affecting 50% of teens. Sixteen percent of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans, but our health priorities seem misdirected.
The focus on measles is overshadowing other critical health concerns. Bobby Kennedy's stance isn't anti-vaccine; he simply advocates for rigorous studies on vaccines, like any other product. He, and others, are concerned with the chronic conditions responsible for 92% of deaths in the United States, and want to address the bigger picture of health policy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it now a time to promote vaccines, which again, the CDC says safe effective that two doses are ninety percent effective against measles? Is it now a time to promote that especially among children who are being impacted by measles in places like Texas and in these states who are unvaccinated according to health officials.
Speaker 1: Pamela, with with respect, why aren't you asking me about the fact that fifty percent of teens have obesity? Why aren't there there there are breathless
Speaker 0: I have other questions for you, but we're talking about this.
Speaker 1: Day after day after day, Pamela. It's breathless coverage of five measles cases. Why aren't we asking why sixteen percent of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans when we're only four percent of the world population because the CDC said, Our immune system, no, it is related, Pamela, and let me say why. Because the entire coverage of Bobby Kennedy is around measles. The Democrats said the word measles twenty five times in the first hearing and said the words obesity, diabetes, and chronic disease zero time.
The HHS priority document under President Biden said the word equity 25 times, said the word vaccines countless times, did not say the word obesity or diabetes. There is a problem right now because this is not zero, this is zero sum. We are focused on a very small subset that's important. We need good infectious disease management. Bobby Kennedy, Doctor.
Offit is not correct. Bobby Kennedy has said one thing about vaccines and one thing only, that they should be studied like any other product. Doctor. Offit on the ACIP committee has recommended vaccines that have ended up being recalled for causing mass issues to kids. Bobby Kennedy has written multiple books not about being anti vaxx but about having good science.
And Doctor. Offit is calling him anti vaccine for literally just saying we need studies. Bobby Kennedy is not concerned with measles. He wants good policies with measles. He wants to attack the ninety two percent of deaths in The United States, which has chronic conditions.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Means continued to hammer the medical industry, exposing how it “doesn’t make money when children are healthy.” “Pharma doesn’t make money when children are healthy. The hospitals don’t make money when the beds are empty. Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the healthcare industry, which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick,” Means said. Visibly frustrated as @CalleyMeans dismantled the narrative CNN wanted to push, Pamela Brown began frantically cutting him off before abruptly ending the segment, calling it a “spirited discussion.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
I support discussing issues like obesity and overmedicating children. Bobby Kennedy is fighting against the incentive for pharma to profit from sick children, and he's supporting efforts to remove soda from SNAP. The problem is that organizations like Merck don't have children's best interests at heart, considering their history of criminal penalties for misleading information.
When the data isn't on their side, RFK Jr. and personal injury lawyers attack the person. My Merck chair is defined by Penn, and there's no quid pro quo. The science continually proves RFK Jr. wrong about vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He talked about childhood vaccines, number one. He talked about electromagnetic radiation, number two. He talked about pesticides. He didn't talk about the things that Cali's talking about here, which is things like obesity or overmedicating children or sugar drapes. I'm all for that.
I agree with you. You can have both
Speaker 1: powerful he gave a he gave a powerful speech about these issues. This this is what Bobby Kinney is fighting against, doctor Offit. As you know, you were the chair at the Children's Hospital, the Merck chair. You you it was like a NASCAR driver wearing their sponsors. Merck paid your $1,500,000 salary.
And this is what Bobby is saying, is that fundamentally, pharma can create good innovations, but they're foundationally incentivized for children to be sick. Pharma doesn't make money when children are healthy. The hospitals don't make money when the beds are empty. Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the health industry which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick. And that's an incentive Bobby Kennedy is going hard after.
I'm in Florida. I'm in I'm in a state senator's office right now. I'm actually lobbying for the state's SNAP bills, which Bobby is really supporting, to get soda off of SNAP. I think the problem is that the public health community, the Merck chairs of pediatricians, I mean, that is just insane. Merck does not have children's interest at heart.
Merck itself has settled billions of dollars in criminal penalties for misleading and to know.
Speaker 2: For transparency, you used to be a pharmaceutical rep. Right, Cali?
Speaker 1: No. No. No. I was there about thirteen years ago with a was a was a lobbyist, which which included
Speaker 2: So you were a lobbyist for pharmaceuticals. Okay.
Speaker 1: That out.
Speaker 2: Right. But really quick, we we do have to go. But doctor Offit, I have to have you respond to his claims about Merck and your ties.
Speaker 0: Sure. What he does is what RFK Jr. Does, which is what all personal injury lawyer types do, which is when the the data aren't on their side, then they attack the person. I'm not Bobby Kennedy's ears.
Speaker 2: Hold on. Hold on, Callie. Let him talk. Chair? Callie, please.
Please.
Speaker 0: I I wanna I don't receive a a okay. It's it's it's I do not have a conflict of interest. The Merc chair is is defined defined by, Penn. And Penn, there is no quid pro quo to being having an endowed chair. Anybody who receives an endowed chair an endowed chair would know.
Secondly, it's like because they they there aren't the data on their side regarding vaccines. They do what all personal injury lawyer types do, which is attack the witness. I'm not RFK Jr's problem. The science that has continually shown he's wrong about vaccines
Speaker 1: for sure. Millions of people. That. That's
Speaker 2: the problem. Thank you both for coming on. Thank you for
Speaker 0: coming again. Of
Speaker 2: Okay. Callie, I let you say your piece, doctor Offit. I let you also respond, and I I appreciate you coming on for this spirited discussion, shall we say? Thank you for joining us. We'll be right back.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
This debate made one thing clear: when mainstream news networks face someone who can challenge their narratives in real time, their arguments crumble, leaving viewers exposed to the truth. While it’s safe to say that @CalleyMeans won’t be invited back on CNN anytime soon, this segment should serve as a stark reminder that the media’s goal is to push narratives, not to report the truth or host an honest debate.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@calleymeans Click here to watch the full debate below: https://t.co/g0bStZqgU0
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@calleymeans Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this report, please do me a quick favor and follow me (@VigilantFox) for more posts like this one. In other news, Elon Musk recently shut down RFK Jr. critics with one profound statement. Read more below: https://t.co/dcrDfMmMzy
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Elon Musk Delivers a Powerful Statement on Bobby Kennedy Jr. Plus, more must-see moments from the Trump-Musk interview. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/AVPelCMAbh
@iam_smx - SMX 🇺🇸
A reminder to those who have been offended by Elon Musk. 😂 "To anyone I have offended, I just want to say I reinvented electric cars and I am sending people to Mars on a Rocketship, did you think I was also gonna be a chill normal dude?" https://t.co/quPY1RpPxh
Video Transcript AI Summary
I know I sometimes say or post strange things, but that's just how my brain works. If I've offended you, I apologize. But look, I reinvented electric cars, and I'm sending people to Mars in a rocket ship. Were you expecting me to be a chill, normal dude on top of all that?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, I know I sometimes say or post strange things, but that's just how my brain works. To anyone I've offended, I just want to say, I reinvented electric cars, and I'm sending people to Mars in a rocket ship. Did you think I was also gonna be a chill, normal dude?
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
When Barack Obama says it the left fawns. When Elon Musk says it the left burns Teslas. https://t.co/cR0mC8AhnX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces a campaign to cut government waste, stating that deficit reduction requires difficult choices, including cuts to valued programs. They claim there has been a tremendous amount of waste and fraud in the government during the Biden administration, estimating federal government fraud at half a trillion dollars. The goal is to reduce this figure, saving taxpayer money by stopping spending on things that very few taxpayers would agree makes sense. Examples cited include transgender animal surgeries and the presence of twenty million dead people in the Social Security database.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone knows that getting rid of the deficit will require some tough decisions, and that includes cutting back on billions of dollars in programs that a lot of people care about. But what should be easy is getting rid of the pointless waste and stupid spending that doesn't benefit anybody. We're calling it the campaign to cut waste.
Speaker 1: You know, there's been a tremendous amount of of waste and fraud in the in the government during the Biden administration, which estimated the the federal government fraud to be half a trillion dollars. What we're trying to do is get that number down to a much smaller figure, save money for the American taxpayer, stop money being spent on things that are that I think very few taxpayers would agree makes sense, You know, transgender animal surgeries or why are the twenty million people who are definitely dead mocked as alive in the Social Security database?
@Ikennect - I am Ken
Fact- @elonmusk = Not a chill normal dude😂 What did you expect? https://t.co/P2M81kHoRY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges saying or posting strange things, attributing it to their unique way of thinking. They apologize to anyone they may have offended. The speaker then states they reinvented electric cars and are sending people to Mars in a rocket ship. They imply that these accomplishments preclude them from being a "chill, normal dude."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, I know I sometimes say or post strange things, but that's just how my brain works. To anyone I've offended, I just wanna say, I reinvented electric cars, and I'm sending people to Mars in a rocket ship. Did you think I was also gonna be a chill, normal dude?
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
I agree with Elon! Do you? https://t.co/Rh0wZbrdcx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fake NGOs are often fake charities, mostly run by Democrats, though Republicans may be involved to maintain silence. Billions of dollars are given to these Democrat-run NGOs, which then go through a network of additional NGOs. This is described as a giant money laundering scheme, where the terms NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous. Arrests are needed in this regard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fake NGOs. I think there needs to be a a number of arrests in that regard as well because these these are these are fake charities, where, mostly Democrats and wasn't both. It's I I don't wanna be fair. There's there's sometimes a little bit of Republican in there because they sometimes throw the Republicans a bone to say, hey. Be be quiet about this.
So it's it's it's it's that's that's that's where you start getting the uniparty thing going on. Mhmm. But it it is overwhelmingly to Democrats, and they they give these give billions of dollars to NGOs run by Democrats that then go through a whole network of additional gen NGOs. It's a giant money laundering scheme. Really, at at this point, I think the word NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous.
@SawyerMerritt - Sawyer Merritt
Trump has just posted about Elon Musk on Truth Social: https://t.co/EZ7hUNSwHr
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
@SawyerMerritt What’s Truth Social?
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
@SawyerMerritt Never heard of it
@andrewrsorkin - Andrew Ross Sorkin
Watch my conversation with @ElonMusk: https://t.co/YedkELVhFn