reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - November 6, 2023 at 4:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
NESARA/GESARA: The Conundrum Let's take a practical look at NESARA/GESARA. Remember when Bank of America eliminated fees? Debt forgiveness? IRS buildings closing? Flat tax rate discussions? Peace Talks tour? Economic reforms in Iraq? BRICS Nations supporting their own currency? Watermarks on ballots? Federal Reserve changes? Precious metals and Basel 3? This process has been in the works for 20+ years. NESARA/GESARA is the new system under Basel 3, SOFR, ISO-20022, and Protocol 20. It's about behavior, not the name. We're already transitioning with the Quantum Financial System. Financial privacy will be restored. The new exchange rate will solidify this transformation. Evidence is available.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

NESARA/GESARA: The Conundrum Can we please take the Magic & Unicorns out of this and look at this in a practical way? When you look at number 1 on the list below do you all remember at the beginning of ladt year when Bank of America the nation’s 2nd largest bank by assets would no longer be charging any nonsufficient funds (NSF) fees. And that by May of that year By May, it would reduce overdraft fees to $10 from $35 and completely eliminate overdraft protection transfer fees, among others. Wait say what now? A bank eliminating fees? A bank eliminating revenue? And not just any bank, a Tier 1 Financial giant like BofA? Do you know how significant this was? Bit you didn't hear this from the news. Why? Because the Rothschilds own the media. Doesn't this qualify as debt forgiveness? Wait didn't I just upload a post explaining the IRS building being closed in Washington and that the EPA case will eventually lead to all of IRS buildings shutting down? And that all of the tax processing will be transfered over to the US Treasury. Remember the bill that was being discussed by Republicans on the 17% flat tax rate? And that food and medicine will not be taxed. Only non essential items. Remember the post about the 2nd Declaration Of Independence? Remember that the 1871 Corp Act was dissolved and that we were going back under Common Law? Remember the Peace Talks tour D. Trump went on that Bibi Netanyahu didn't want anything to do with? Remember the Economic & Monetary Reforms that Iraq had to implement in order to not only be Article 8 Compliant but to have the restrictions removed on their currency? Remember the BRICS Nations saying that they will not allow any country to be apart if that platform until they are able to dump the fiat dollar and support their own currency. When you look at number 9 on this chart what have you come to know about election interference and the watermarks on the ballots? Who has been charged with election interference? When you look at number 13 about the Federal Reserve being removed. Didn't we already discuss how it was nationalized and taken away from the Rothschilds? People I am showing you this because you have Bern under NESARA/GESARA for years now. You know what will solidify it and make it come out in the open for the world to experience? The reinstatement of the Iraqi Dinar on the Forex Market. You have over 100 countries sitting on IQD that are waiting on Iraq to release the new rate so these countries can liquidate their economic recovery plans. Because all of them are going to be under "The New Republic". Why do you think I keep saying that N & G is not coming. It's already here? Look at number 10. What are countries around the world doing with precious metals? Didn't Iraq come out and state officially that their budget is equivalent to 70 tins of gold? Didn't I tell you all this is what Basel 3 is for? Use your commonsense people. They do not need to announce anything. Did the Federal Reserve announce that they would take over the entire banking system? No. They passed it during Christmas Eve while everyone was sleeping and you woke up the next day to slavery. This is a process that has been in the works for 20+ years. Stop following Phil Godlewski. He takes info from other people and passes it off as "Secret Intel Sources". Wait until Iraq establishes their new rate on the trade markets.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

NESARA/GESARA is literally 2nd Declaration Of Independence that was signed back in 2020. I showed you all this. You will never hear NESARA/GESARA referenced as that name by any government or banking officials. Why? Because it's just an acronym for what they are doing in regards to the new system under Basel 3. Under SOFR. Under ISO-20022. Under Protocol 20. How? Because the gold standard will be the basis to everything. Remember it's not about what the system is called. It's about how it behaves. So when you look at all 20 of those points study everything I have told you about. National Economic Security And Reformation Act is for countries. Global Economic Security And Reformation Act is for The BRICS Nations which is essentially the same thing. People are looking at this as if it was going to be a flip of a switch if mainstream liberal news was going to announce this to the world while the Rothschilds were still in power in 2001.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Reformation/Restoration: The Gold Standard I also have the flat tax legislation. I have to dive a bit deeper. But the point is this. Break down all 20 lines and you will find the evidence everywhere. All you have to do is switch NESARA/GESARA with Economic & Monetary Reforms. It's the same thing.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Number 20 is what we are literally under now. The Quantum Financial System. Will not be the only area with new technology in the quantum space. • Education • Banking • Agriculture • Gaming • Technology How can anyone sit there and deny we are not using this currently? And this was printed 20 years ago. Financial Privacy will be restored given that we will be the only ones with access to certain banking services with no middle men. Encrypted apps where Peer to Peer transfers can be carried out without the government involved. Without the IRS provisions. This is why you all have to do the homework. You are already under this transition. It will be solidified once the new exchange rate is released. Remember we have billions in IQD in the reserves that Donald Trump speaks about all the time. This is what will transform our nation. This is why people are able to come out and debunk N & G because nobody is holding their feet to the fire as to how can something not come when it's already here with all the evidence in the world available? I was blocked in one chatroom who was frustrated at all the source links confirming N & G. I broke down the Economic & Monetary Reforms that reflect what N & G is.

Saved - November 10, 2023 at 3:13 AM

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

THERE IS NO INCOME TAX LAW The 16th Amendment does not trump the 5th Amendment as the 16th Amendment of the US Constitution, known as the income tax amendment, was never properly ratified Imagine paying the government to stay out of prison? https://t.co/2g5f4xXats

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explores various perspectives on the American government, particularly the IRS and the Federal Reserve. It questions the existence of a law requiring American citizens to pay income taxes, with interviews featuring former IRS agents, tax experts, and jurors who argue that the income tax system is unconstitutional. The video also delves into concerns about the erosion of individual rights, the rise of a police state, and the push for a one world government. It highlights the power and control of the Federal Reserve, suggesting it is used by the elite to manipulate the economy. The speaker urges people to resist government control, emphasizing the need to shut down the Federal Reserve and regain control of their government. There are also mentions of potential government actions such as martial law, relocation of populations, and the construction of internment camps, which the speaker believes are part of a planned takeover of the American people. The video encourages unity and action to restore power to the people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What happens if Speaker 1: your your own government is using more force and more coercion on its own citizens for the purpose of achieving its political ends? Is that government engaged in terrorism? Speaker 2: American people expect us to protect them and protect their civil liberties. I'm going to do that. Speaker 3: What is being sold to the American people today as Americanism. If you peel off the label, you find so much similarity to what we were fighting against when we were fighting communism And Nazi is in in fashion. Speaker 4: The government's now putting a national ID card together. Speaker 5: We will be carrying our papers, and they have recommended there'll be checkpoints, throughout the country. Some type of a physical proof such as fingerprints or retinal prints have to be on it. Speaker 1: Desires of the people really have no consequence. They go out Speaker 3: and they vote. It doesn't make any difference which candidate they elect. Speaker 6: Mister Curtis, Are there programs that can be used to secretly fix selections? Yes. Speaker 7: This is absolutely Orwellian. I mean, it's talking about big brother looking over your shoulder at absolutely everything you Speaker 8: There is no constitutional basis for a tax on the wages is of Americans living and working in the 50 states of the union. Period. Speaker 9: End of argument. If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly Deceiving them, that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop Speaker 4: to it. Speaker 10: You've caught me unprepared. I'll come back. Speaker 11: No. I don't wanna do Speaker 12: There had Speaker 4: to be a law. Right? Speaker 13: Where is the law? Show me the law. Speaker 4: Why is the Supreme Court decision in the city on there? Speaker 11: And I think we're finished. Speaker 3: They think it's the law, and They have all the guns. You know, it's an authoritarian approach. Speaker 2: Now we can see a new world coming into view, a world in which there is the very prospect of a new world order. Speaker 7: The latest technology for identifying people when they make purchases is actually the implantable chip that you can They embed directly into human flesh. Speaker 14: Can a microscopic tag being planted in a person's body to track his every movement. You will rule on that. Mark my words. Speaker 3: A chip and everybody would be the Universal Monetary System par excellence, because there'd be no from it. Speaker 15: Americans have been taught to expect their salvation from government instead of recognizing government as a as the most dangerous threat they'll face in their lives. Speaker 16: It is the greatest hopes ever perpetrated by government against the working men and women of America. Speaker 3: It's organized Prime. All you do is you call the republicans, the and you call the democrats, the Speaker 4: The year was 1913. Woodrow Wilson was president, and powerful banking interests who had been trying for years Finally achieved their long term goal of a silent coup d'etat by taking control of the American government. The first thing they did to accomplish their takeover was convince secretary of state Philander Knox To lie to the American people and tell them that the 16th amendment, the income tax amendment, had been legally ratified by the states When it was not, the bankers knew that this tax would ultimately end up in their pockets. Because of this fraud, The American people were led to believe there was now a tax on their labor. Congress and the president are completely aware of this fraud, And it was even cited in a recent court case. That very same year, the bankers committed their 2nd and by far most diabolical fraud ever perpetrated on the American people by bribing senators to pass the Federal Reserve Act without the required constitutional amendment. Speaker 3: All in favor say aye. Speaker 4: They did this during Christmas vacation when many senators were home celebrating the holidays with their families. And that's how the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act came into being. They were very clever, and they understood that whoever issued the money for America would control the government. The bankers won, and the American people lost because most politicians We'll sell their soul for a dollar. And now the fellow reserve could issue dollars legally. As mayor Rothschild said, give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws. He knew that he and the other bankers would now control the laws of the nation. Government gave these bankers one of its most important powers, and now had to borrow money from them and pay interest to finance the government. So the American People were forced to lower their standard of living and pay a graduated income tax to the government just so the government could give these bankers More profits. President Woodrow Wilson, who signed the Federal Reserve Act into law, Later said in regret, I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly Ruin my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, No longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the rest of a small group for dominant men. Speaker 17: The Federal Reserve was created by Congress in 1913, and it was trusted with the power granted originally to the Congress by the US Constitution to coin money and regulate the value thereof. Speaker 4: What's your name? Speaker 18: Jan. Speaker 4: Hi, Jan. I'm Aaron Russo. I produced the movie trailer Speaker 18: Is this a No. Speaker 4: No. That's not a joke. No. No. No. No. No. I produced the movie Trading Places with Eddie Murphy and The Rose with Bette Midler. Many movies, and I'm doing a feature film. And, my film is about my quest to find out whether or not people pay income taxes. Do you pay an income tax? Speaker 18: Yes, I do. You do. Speaker 3: Have you Speaker 4: ever seen a law that requires you to pay an income tax? Speaker 18: Have I ever read it? Do you mean And the page is black and white? No. No. Speaker 4: So you paid the income tax, I assume? Of late. Well, actually, no, I didn't file last year, but, I'm sorry. Is this on film? No. I've paid my tax. My question to you is, have you ever seen a law that says you have to pay an income tax? Speaker 3: The law is that guy that can't wear that badge and a gun. That's the one that puts you in jail. That's Hello? Speaker 4: Actually, I can't stand the IRS. Okay. They're evil. Speaker 18: Do you Speaker 4: have any fear of the IRS? Speaker 19: Not not really because I'm Canadian. Speaker 18: I think it's actually unconstitutional is what I've heard. But, But to avoid any hassle, I pay it Speaker 17: If there was known law and I wasn't afraid of them coming and taking me to jail, absolutely, I wouldn't pay taxes. Speaker 18: Okay. Then, no, I wouldn't pay income taxes. Speaker 3: It's a no brainer. You wouldn't pay it. Speaker 20: I wouldn't pay it. Speaker 9: Why would anybody? Speaker 4: Because they you know, that's that's what they tell us. We must do us. Bad Americans. Speaker 3: Would you pay it? No. Would you pay it? Speaker 4: No. How would you pay taxes if you're an actor? Speaker 3: The income tax is not legal because it would be a direct tax and it is not apportioned as the Constitution demands. Speaker 20: If it's against the constitution, then why are we doing Speaker 21: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code that requires you to file a tax return. Of course there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but Sure. So naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't Find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 9: I had to leave the IRS because I presented evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was Violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns. And the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns, and that they would, Provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 13: The We The People Foundation For Constitutional Education put a full page ad in the USA Today on July 7, 2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill 2 birds with 1 stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I'll win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked, Congress, we've asked A lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers, they can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 4: I was surprised to hear these highly trained and decorated IRS agents telling me there was no law requiring American citizens To file a 10 40 or to pay an income tax on their labor. Speaker 21: I haven't, filed an income federal income tax return since I left. Speaker 13: I have not filed a tax return since 1999. Approximately 67,000,000 people don't file income tax return. Speaker 4: I made a decision to go to Washington so I could attend the We The People Foundation press conference. They were going to serve a class action lawsuit on the IRS Signed by over 3,000 people because the IRS has refused to show the law that makes Americans liable to file a 10 40 or to pay an income tax on their labor. I was very curious as to why the IRS refused to show the law, as it seemed such a simple thing to do. Yet I was skeptical about the foundation's claims. There had to be a law. Right? I mean, we've well been told over and over and over again That we had to pay income taxes. Speaker 16: Most people believe that the income tax system is legal, and that the revenue from the tax is used in the public interest. However, there is a substantial conclusive body of evidence that proves that our income tax system represents the most pernicious form of tyranny. It is the greatest hopes ever perpetrated by government against the working men and women of America. Speaker 22: American citizens, Along with the foundation, I've been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 21: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, Say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were, in effect, nonanswers. Speaker 23: There are a group of people standing outside today who, assert that no law requires to pay taxes and that you will not answer their petition to the government, As to whether they're required Speaker 8: to pay taxes, are they required to pay taxes? Speaker 24: I've been paying my taxes ever since I had my 1st job. And I think It's a fundamental construct of our nation that those of us who expect and demand the services from our government that the government provides be they the protection of our country Through the military or be they the education of our children or be they the protection of our environment that we must pay for those services. So yes, I think there is a fundamental obligation and that it's an understood and well accepted one. Speaker 16: Joe Bannister and I had a meeting in the White House with president Clinton's economic adviser, Jason Furman. He accepted the remonstrance for the president. On June 2nd, I called and spoke with him. His words were, we have decided that the issue of the legality of the income tax is not a high priority matter for the White House, and we will not be participating in any conference on the subject. I decided not to eat until My death or until the government agreed to send their experts To meet with the experts from the tax honesty movement and with the help of congressman Bartlett, A deal was made. Speaker 25: I'm very pleased that through these several trying weeks and now months That we have secured the agreement of the IRS and the Justice Department because some of the questions are beyond the purview of IRS That they will both attend a public symposium where these issues can be formally, addressed. Speaker 16: Last Thanksgiving, DOJ and IRS notified congressman Bartlett that they would not participate. Congressman Bartlett then waited until late January. He informed me That he would not be participating. Speaker 26: Why do you think Speaker 20: you've been able to get away with not paying or filing your income taxes for so long? Speaker 9: Well, first of all, I've not gotten away with anything. I'm not hiding from anyone. I'm simply asking the IRS to show me the laws that Apparently require me to do these things, and they are suspiciously, reticent to answer questions Questions from me, and of course, there are millions of other people, many other organizations who have attempted to get answers. They act very viciously when asked to simply sit down at the table with the American people and discuss what their obligations are. Rather than pulling up a chair, they pull out a club. Speaker 4: As a matter of fact, David k. Johnston of The New York Times asked Terry Lemons of the IRS, Why won't the IRS answer the questions set forth in the petitions from the American people? Mister Lemmon's response was, The government is answering the questions through enforcement actions in the courts. Speaker 22: This is a very chilling remark On the government's use of brute force instead of civility and logic. The federal government itself refuses to provide the American people, who are coercively being subjected to this extraction of their private property without any underlying legal justification. There is no law There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportion tax on their labor in compensation for services. There is no law. The Speaker 16: March will stop in front of the IRS building. Speaker 4: They are now going to serve a class action lawsuit on the IRS. Very courageous. Speaker 22: My name is Charles Bell. I'm here to serve this complaint on behalf of the American people for the Internal Revenue Service. The Complaint is accompanied by an affidavit. It's, under the hand of, Robert Schultz. Speaker 16: Case was served. We'll call you with the Speaker 3: case number. Case has been filed. We'll call you with the case number. Speaker 27: Thank Thank you. Speaker 22: Okay. Thank you. We appreciate your time. Speaker 3: America, baby. Freedom. Speaker 22: Today, effectively, the people have said to their servant government that, that our rights are not going to be any longer denied and that we're gonna have answers to our petition, our legitimate lawful petitions for redress of grievances, which are guaranteed in the first amendment to our constitution. So once and for all, we will get an answer. Speaker 4: On August 31, 2005, federal judge Emmett Sullivan ruled, The government does not have to answer the American people's questions even though it is guaranteed in the first amendment. Our courts have made a decision that government does not have to show the law that it enforces, and the press never reported on this. Have we given this judge the authority to overrule the constitution, the very foundation of American life? Speaker 2: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes are not. Speaker 3: The country's taxes must be fixed, and I know what to do with it. If you think you're paying too much now, just wait till I get Speaker 28: Now, mister Hamley, I'd like to ask you some What did the government do with all the money we give them in taxes? Speaker 8: When president Reagan was elected, one of the first things that he did was a Point a blue ribbon panel of of business people headed by Peter Grace, and is commonly referred to as the Grace Commission. And they their job was to research, all the various areas of the federal government and make a report. One of the quotes from the Grace Commission is 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before 1 nickel spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. Speaker 28: If we pay the salaries of the congressmen and the senators, we're supporting them, aren't we? Speaker 3: Well, yes. Speaker 28: Yes. Well, then why can't we list them as dependents and deduct them? Speaker 8: We've been brainwashed. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, which is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, How did we fund government from 17/76 to 19 13? Speaker 3: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. A lot of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand That education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money Coming into the government, we need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction, the amount of money that we spend on defense is exactly equal to the amount of corporate income tax, which is quite legal and quite constitutional. I think we should not want the income tax for several reasons. One is that It is the instrument of totalitarianism. It is the means by which the government can manipulate people and puts you into a condition of of servitude. Speaker 29: Every year, you give the federal government a form that says, here's how all my money worked. If you lie, you could go to prison. So you're required to give them a financial statement that under, You know, the force of law could put you in prison if it's not impeccable, right? And under the law, they're supposed to do the They're supposed to give you back a financial statement that says, here's what we did with your money, except you comply and they don't. In fiscal, 99, the Department of Defense had $1,100,000,000,000 of undocumented adjustments. The following year, they had 2.3 trillion of undocumentable adjustments Speaker 4: I decided to call the IRS. I spoke to Anthony Burke in Media Relations. He was very nice to me and I explained to him that I was an award winning film producer then I was doing a documentary on the IRS. He seemed a bit stunned by this, then explained to me that Commission Iveson nor anybody else We'd go on film to discuss the income tax, but he did say he would call me back. I thanked him for that, but I couldn't help wondering, Why was the government making it so difficult for people to see the law? So I decided to bring my crew down to the IRS building to see if I could find some employees to interview. And here's what happened. Speaker 30: I mean, you get out through me. That's it. Speaker 4: Who who who who are you to tell me I can't film here? What's the law? Just tell me where the law is that says that. Can you show me the law that says I can't film here? Is America a free country? I Speaker 31: told them Speaker 30: they couldn't film here, and He's asking 9,000,000 questions. I told him that's a federal government law. Hey. I told him he could film here. He's telling me he's a citizen, all that story. Speaker 4: I'm gonna kill him and say, where's the lord that says I can't film here? Hang on. I'm asking doing I'm asking another question, sir. Then Homeland Security showed up because I was such a threat to Washington. Speaker 30: You got a driving license up? Speaker 12: Yeah. I do. Put that away from me. Speaker 4: After convincing Homeland Security, I really wasn't Osama bin Laden. I kept wishing the IRS would allow me to interview somebody. Why wouldn't they show the law? What were they so nervous about? I began to have a frightening thought. What if it was our own government we had to be afraid of? With that disturbing thought in my mind, I went to see a group of tax experts. Speaker 32: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average 1st in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 33: The constitution allows for 2 kinds of taxes. They're called direct and indirect. Speaker 12: The federal government in the constitution can tax almost anything, as long as it apportions the tax if it's direct. Speaker 32: The indirect tax is, for example, an excise tax. I can avoid the excise tax on gasoline. I can choose to ride my bicycle. I can avoid the excise tax on tobacco. I can choose not to smoke, or I can grow my own tobacco. Speaker 34: The income tax which is being applied now doesn't meet the criteria of either Direct or indirect taxes. Speaker 4: The IRS claims that in 1913, the 16th Amendment, the income tax amendment allowed the government a third form of taxation. What was the Supreme Court's ruling on that? Speaker 12: The Supreme Court in the case of Stanton versus Baltic Mining. I mean, what could be clearer than this? The provisions of the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation. Speaker 34: The Rucheauber case also said that the 16th amendment did not impose any new taxes and did not change any of the taxing restrictions of the constitution. Speaker 22: There were also other major Supreme Court cases in that same period from 1916 up until about 1923, Speaker 12: Stratton Independence versus Hobart, Southern Pacific versus Loeb, Bowers versus Speaker 8: Kurbo Empire, Burnett versus Harnell, Doyle versus Mitchell. It's actually very simple. Congress tried to enact an income tax in 18/94. The Supreme Court said that's unconstitutional. When the Supreme Court says something is unconstitutional, it's unconstitutional. They tried again in 1913 and the Supreme said the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation. So if they didn't have it then and they didn't get it, they don't have it. There is no constitutional basis for a tax on the wages of Americans living and working in the 50 states of the union. Period. End of argument. Speaker 35: I have a letter here from Daniel Inouye's office of the United States Senate that says based on the research Formed by the Congressional Research Service, there is no provisions which specifically and unequivocally require an individual to pay an income tax, Period. End of story. There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: The definition of income In the constitution was given in the Eisner versus Montgomery case, and it turns on gains or profits that are made from some activity. Speaker 12: Doyle v. Mitchell, 247 US 179, 1918, here's what he said. The idea of gain or increase arising from corporate activities. In other words, it doesn't mean wages, it doesn't mean dividends, it doesn't mean alimony. It means a gain or a profit arising from corporate activity. Speaker 8: These liens that are recorded against people by the government for tax liens are nothing more than allegations. They are non substantive. They have never been determined by a neutral third party, such as a court to have one shred of validity. Speaker 35: If you ever get a notice of a of of an audit or anything else, the first thing you should do is a Freedom of Information Act request For records that they're using to substantiate or justify the audit. Speaker 12: There is nothing in the Internal Revenue Code that creates any such thing as an income tax evasion or crime. There's nothing in a code that allows IRS agents to seize property. The government is involved in judicial blackmail. The government knows that if it legally seizes somebody's property, that person doesn't have the funds and he can't even get a lawyer Who can help them? Speaker 36: I conducted investigations in the title 18, the criminal code, the US criminal code. And in there, the statutes and the regulations are very specific as to what is violating the statute. And the Internal Revenue Code Title 26, There's nothing specific in there. I mean, even the FBI's fear of the IRS. Speaker 34: You have to understand that an agency which will Unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist, it's not gonna care. If we, the people, Don't know what our rights are. They're not gonna tell us. Speaker 9: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 34: This small booklet Includes the Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence. This is a document that every Citizens should read. It's a document which freed an entire nation. This is the internal revenue code. And, this document, and it, the unlawful application of this document by the Internal Revenue Service, has enslaved the nation that this document attempted to free. Speaker 4: I was very impressed with the people in the tax and honesty movement. They were on kooks. They were highly intelligent, well researched, and very genuine. I was wondering why I never heard about all these Supreme Court decisions in the media. So I really wanted the IRS's point of view. Because to get the true story, it was imperative if I hear both sides. I kept wishing Anthony Burke would call me back. He seemed like an honest man. I then proceeded to call my message machine. Speaker 37: Hi. This message is for Aaron Russo. This is Anthony Burke at the Internal Revenue Service. Let me, suggest, Some people that you might want to think about talking to. One would be Don Alexander, who's a former commissioner who's here in town in Washington. Another would be Sheldon Cohen, who is both a former commissioner and former chief counsel. All those guys I think can answer Question about, you know, where in the tax law it says that you have to pay taxes. Speaker 4: Wow. Good news, I thought. So I called Sheldon Cohn because he used to be the IRS commissioner, he wrote the tax code, and he was also general counsel to the IRS. He is a true expert, And I couldn't find a better person to answer my questions. He graciously agreed to my interview. The reason I'm doing this documentary It's because there are many people in America today who believe that there's no law that requires them to pay an income tax or file a 10.40. And there are many people going to jail for it, fighting over it. Speaker 11: The Internal Revenue Code is authorized by the 16th Amendment. Speaker 4: Think it should be clarified. I don't I think government should be transparent to the people. Why doesn't the IRS commissioner sit down with them and just explain it in clear English Why I Speaker 11: don't think they really care. They all think I thought I think they're just playing word games. Speaker 3: You don't Speaker 4: think they're sincere people? No. Speaker 11: I don't think they're sincere people. Speaker 4: What does voluntary compliance mean? And what does the IRS code say it's voluntary to comply, not mandatory? Speaker 11: That's a word euphemism we use. We we use voluntary compliance when we when we when we talk about traffic signals. Most people At 2 o'clock in the morning, do you stop at a red light? Yeah. Is there a cop there? Speaker 4: Sometimes I don't. I do. I do. Well and most of Speaker 11: us do. Most of us do, but that's voluntary compliance. Speaker 4: That was a complete perversion of logic. Traffic laws state that it is mandatory to stop at a red light. The IRS code says it's voluntary to comply. Mandatory and voluntary are the complete opposite of each other, yet he wants us to believe that they mean the same thing. So can the government criminally prosecute somebody of information put on their 10/40? Speaker 11: Yes. Speaker 4: Right. So it doesn't apply to 5th Amendment? No. But the 5th Amendment says I I I don't have to do anything that incriminates myself. Speaker 11: Well, that doesn't incriminate you to put to put your income Speaker 4: But you said before, I could put put in jail for it. The commissioner wants us to believe that although the IRS demands that you fill out the 10.40 and you can go to jail for it, That they are not violating a 5th Amendment rights of self incrimination. That is absurd. Isn't it true that the word income is not defined anywhere in the Internal Revenue Code. Speaker 11: The law says that the government has a right to tax income from any source derived. Speaker 4: So but the word income is not defined in the code. It just says income without a definition of what income is. Speaker 3: That's right. Speaker 4: Correct? Speaker 37: Yeah. Speaker 4: There are many different kinds of taxes. Well, how can an American citizen know what income is Speaker 31: if the Speaker 4: code doesn't define it? If they're paying an income courts will define it. Do you remember what constitutional attorney Edwin Viera said? Speaker 1: The definition of income in the constitution Was given in the Eisner versus Montgomery case, and it turns on gains or profits that are made from some activity. Speaker 4: So the Supreme Court has ruled income is not wages. It's not labor. It's gain from corporate activity. I believe that a man's labor is his private property. Speaker 11: That's your view, but it's not the law. Speaker 8: The Supreme Court's even said your labor is your private property. When I go to work for somebody, it's a trade. It's an even exchange. I do some work, you give me some money. Speaker 4: In 1916, we had the Bruichaber case and the Stanton case. And the Brucehaven case and the Stanton case said that the 16th Amendment gave the government no new taxing power. Speaker 11: I'm not going to argue the niceties of that with you. Speaker 33: And it came up again in a case called Peck v. Lowe Where the Supreme Court said the 16th Amendment did not extend Congress's taxing power to any new or accepted subjects. In other Speaker 4: the case. And they found the person not guilty for lack of filing, okay? And I asked her why they found him not guilty, and she said because the IRS couldn't show us the law that made him liable to file a 10/40. Speaker 26: All they need to do, If there is a law, is to show us the law, which, of course, they never did. Speaker 4: And the reason they didn't do it was why? Speaker 26: Because there is no law. Speaker 11: Title 26 requires you to file a return. Speaker 4: But doesn't title 26 have to be in compliance the Supreme Court decisions. Speaker 11: You're gonna take a 1920 case and superimpose it on the whole internal Remedy code that was written after it? No. That's not Speaker 4: I can't believe what I just heard. Rewind. Speaker 11: You're gonna take a 1920 case and superimpose it on the old Internal Revenue Code that was written after it? No. That's not. Speaker 4: Remember he said earlier the Internal Revenue Code was authorized by the 16th Amendment? Speaker 11: The Internal Revenue Code is authorized by the 16th Amendment. Speaker 4: Remember, The Supreme Court said the 16th amendment did not give the government any new taxing power. These decisions have never been overturned. Let's listen forever. Can the lower courts overrule the Supreme Court? No. How are they putting people in jail today for not paying a tax on their labor When the Supreme Court said they don't have to. Doesn't the IRS code have to be compliant to the Supreme Court? That's my opinion. Speaker 11: This is a waste of time. Speaker 18: Well, let Speaker 11: me just whatever I say, you're not gonna believe. Speaker 4: He's right. I don't believe him, and neither should you. He wants us to believe we should obey the IRS code, which is being enforced in violation of the many Supreme Court decisions. If the Supreme Court made Speaker 11: a decision Thank you thank you, Aaron. I think we're finished. Speaker 4: I'm sorry, mister Cohen, you're doing that. Speaker 11: Well, I'm sorry that you you constantly re argue the point. You're liable because the law says that you're reliable Speaker 4: And Speaker 11: the court say the law says you're liable Does and that's why you're liable. Speaker 4: You see, he's talking about the lower courts who are not in compliance with the Supreme Court as they have to be. Doesn't the court have to be in compliance with the Supreme Court? Speaker 11: The Supreme Court has so held. Speaker 10: Where? You caught me unprepared. Speaker 4: I'll come back. Speaker 3: Well, I Speaker 11: don't wanna do that. Speaker 4: But let let me ask you a hypothetical question. Speaker 11: You're making silly arguments here. Speaker 4: Why is the Supreme Court decision a silly argument? Speaker 11: Well, because it's inapplicable. Speaker 4: That made my heart stop. He just said Supreme Court decisions do not apply to the IRS. That's the behavior you would expect from a totalitarian country, Maybe China or Russia or Cuba, not from America. They're just making up the law as they go along. Now I knew the tax honesty movement was right. The IRS thrives on intimidation and fear, not by law. It's no different than a criminal protection racket using force to extract your money from you. Then the former IRS commissioner, now working at a prestigious Washington law firm, threatens me. Watch. Speaker 11: Aaron, you understand Yiddish. Horn ist. Speaker 4: For those of you who don't understand Yiddish, that means nothing will help you. Now it all became clear. I understood why the IRS wouldn't go on camera and talk about where the law was. I understood why all the senators I called refused to be interviewed. There is no law. And now you know What our political leaders and the courts have known for decades and have tried to cover up. The United States Constitution strictly forbids a direct tax on the wages and salaries of American citizens. The United States Supreme Court has consistently ruled that the income tax is a tax on profits and gains, not on labor and wages. On behalf of the American people, I challenge the IRS to show me a statute that allows a direct unapportioned tax On the wages and labor of the American people, and if I'm wrong, I will give my most humble apologies to the IRS. If the IRS is wrong, and there is no law, then every person who's been jailed should be let out of jail immediately, And any asset seized should be returned to their rightful owners. If this is a nation of laws and a free country, Then the IRS should show the law to the American people. I felt an overwhelming need To understand why juries were finding innocent people guilty of not filing a tax return when there was no law requiring them to do so. So I went to talk to Marcy Brooks, a juror who used the common sense and did not allow the judge to rear the jury into a guilty verdict. Speaker 26: He was being tried for 4 counts of not filing his income tax. Speaker 32: Okay. Speaker 26: And our question was, well, what is to decide? Either he did or he didn't. It never occurred to us that he might actually be innocent while at the same time not filing. In the federal government, it is not a felony not to file taxes. Finally, they said, okay. If we're gonna get this guy, we're gonna have to put it in the state. They called up the IRS agent, agent Crainer. Speaker 38: Crainer? Yeah. Robert Crainer? Mhmm. Speaker 39: This is Ken Daugherty. He's also an investigator with the line of Speaker 31: Apartment Road now. There's a request for a copy of the delegation of the felony order. Speaker 39: Right. And I talked to my boss about that, and he said that my badge is that. Speaker 31: Badge is the authority. And I thought it had to be ready. Speaker 26: The last question that the defense asked him was, did you write any of this down? And agent Crainer looked right at him and right at us. And he said, I never wrote anything down. And yet when we saw the video, there he was writing notes. You know? And so I'm thinking, okay. At this point, the judge is supposed to say, agent Craner, It is clear that you have committed perjury. It it wasn't even noticed. It finally came to the climax. Mister Harrell looked right at the prosecutor, and he said, I will tell you the same thing I have told Over and over again to government officials, you show me the law that requires me to file a Tax return, and I'll be glad to do it. Speaker 31: And the m I has, under what is the requirement, that you claim under the private duty stuff. And the requirement under the regulations is what section? My question to you is What particular act are we discussing here that I am liable to do these things that you claim I'm liable to do? Speaker 39: Your exact question would be again. Okay. What is the section that what? But I guess I'm still not understanding your question, mister Brown. Speaker 31: Well, you must be familiar What did you do that you had the peace powers to enforce? Speaker 26: The prosecutor absolutely ignored him. And he started slandering mister Harrell. Just started attacking his character. Speaker 13: They're calling us tax cheats. They're calling us fanatics. They're calling us weirdos. I don't care what you call me, but I have 1 question. Where is the law? Show me the law. Speaker 33: I Can't let this turn into a rational debate because if they do, they lose it. So they have to insult people and say it's frivolous. Speaker 26: We felt like There was an overall arrogance and that they were railroading mister Harrell and wanting us to participate. Judge Coogan. He looked right at us, and he said, I will instruct the jury according to the law. We were sent to the deliberation. The judge promised us that he would give us the law. And we looked and we looked, and it was not there. We wrote a note to the judge asking for a copy of the law. 10 minutes later, we get a note back. You have everything you need, but there was no law. And he had promised us. At at that point, I felt betrayed. I felt like this man promised us the law. And that's what this whole thing is about, the law. We request it, And he still denies us Speaker 4: the law. And the reason they didn't do it was why? Speaker 26: Because there is no law. Remember, we're talking about the Illinois state law here, okay, which is a law in Illinois. So we got out that law And we read it several times and I said, okay. Wait. Wait. Wait. You know, because they kept saying, but this is law in Illinois. And I said, look at the beginning of it. It says anyone required to file a federal income tax return is required to file an Illinois tax return. I said if it is true that he's not required to file a federal return, then that nullifies the Illinois law. 2 people. They kept saying, but he's gonna get by with it. And I said, what is he getting by with but his rights? If there is no law, he's not breaking a law. He's just standing on his rights. Are we gonna deny him that? That's when this 1 juror sat back and kind of rolled his eyes. And he said, you mean We don't have to pay taxes. Speaker 18: All of Speaker 26: a sudden we realized that this trial was much bigger. And the ramifications of this trial were gonna be so broad If it actually got out? I mean, it's like it's like we had just discovered this great government secret. And so when we came out for deliver for the Delivering of the verdict, the judge was I'm sure even at this point, I'm sure he still thought we would pass, give a guilty verdict. And And the reason I say that is because of the look on his face when the first not guilty was read. His face just turned white. I mean, it's like, I don't believe this. The 2nd time you could hear people out in the audience, just in the courtroom, you know, just going, Wow. You know? And the judge is just getting red in the face. I mean, he was just livid. And the judge got up and left. I sat there, and I thought This truly is a victory for the people. And I have never felt more patriotic. And I knew that we had done the right thing. I looked at that man, mister Harrell. And I thought, The system might not work all the time. But this time, for that man, it did. Speaker 4: In November 2004, the government arrested former IRS criminal investigator, Joe Bannister. They charged him with fraud for telling the American people the truth about the income tax laws. The jury obviously agreed with Joe. Speaker 10: Well, it just showed mister Bannister to be honest and straightforward and working within the law. Speaker 4: Vernice Kuglin, a Federal Express pilot, claimed there was no law requiring Americans to file an income tax. She also won in court. 24 people were criminally charged by the IRS Because they claimed there was no law requiring them to file an income tax return. Speaker 5: The fact is neither the judge nor the prosecutor But the IRS could bring that statute in there because it's not in the books. The jury came back with an acquittal for everyone. Speaker 40: When the matter is put to the test, which means in terms Speaker 18: of Speaker 40: court and enforcement action, There is a 100% success rate in shooting down these arguments. Speaker 26: The mafia has a Code, and they follow it, and it's a code of honor. But the IRS has no code of honor. Speaker 4: Meet judge in a federal judge presiding over the Erwin Schiff tax case, who denied Erwin the ability to prove to a jury that there was no law requiring Americans to file an income tax return. He denied Erwin the right to prove to a jury there was no law by stating, I will not allow the law in my courtroom. But the judge made sure the government then had to show the law as written By telling the jury, you must follow the law as I give it to you. Speaker 12: Nobody can know what the law is Because the law is what the judges say the law is. Speaker 35: The lower courts today will not allow people and especially in tax cases to bring in Supreme Court decisions as their evidence Speaker 4: Here we have a federal judge, re eroding an American citizen by saying Supreme Court decisions are irrelevant, and again, nothing from the press defending our freedoms. So if you ever find yourself as a juror on a task case, Be sure to ask the judge to show you the statute written by Congress that allows the government to tax the wages of the American people. If the Judge can't show you the Law, then how can you possibly, in good conscience, convict someone and destroy their life? Let's see how the IRS treated one of America's greatest heroes and someone I cherished as a child. Speaker 41: Joe Lewis was an American icon. Victorious in his 1st 27 fights, the brown bomber quickly rose to heavyweight champion of the world. His 1938 knockout of German Max Schmeling who represented Hitler's Aryan ideal earned him the admiration of millions of Americans. Speaker 3: This one is taking care of place. Power snuckily right to the body, a left up to the top, and straightly just down. The cloud is high. Speaker 41: Right after Pearl Harbor was bombed, Joe had a title fight where he donated his feet to navy war relief. Speaker 3: Well, I'm not waiting for nothing. I'm waiting for my country, not think that by the greatest piece of work that anybody can do. Well, I certainly agree with you for that, but you're turning over an awful lot of money. Well, we all turned over a whole lot this country, this at this time. Speaker 41: Joe volunteered for the segregated army and defended his title while in the service. This time donating his normal fee to army relief. Speaker 3: I've only done what any red blood American would do. Speaker 41: Since the checks were in Joe's name, the IRS taxed him on their full amount even though he never saw a penny of it. At the end of the war, Joe was awarded the legion of merit. But what most people didn't know was that the IRS was charging him $50,000 a year in interest alone on his debt. When Joe's beloved mother died, leaving him $600, the IRS immediately seized it. They also confiscated all of his children's trust funds. Joe was forced to continue fighting until he was 37 and out of shape just to pay off his ever mounting debt to the IRS, Which grew to $1,000,000, $100,000 a year just in interest. At the end of his life, Joe was forced to become a greeter at a Las Vegas hotel just to make ends meet. Speaker 38: It was a shameful thing to see a man like him, great fighter, great human being, being Humiliated and and destroyed in this manner, because after all, when you owe Internal Revenue money, No matter what you have, they take away from you, and they took a lot away from Joe Lewis. Speaker 4: I made a decision to drive to Virginia Beach from Washington because I had heard stories about 2 law abiding families who had been brutalized by the IRS. They were falsely accused by their bookkeeper of being drug smugglers and tax cheats. And incredibly to me, without any investigation, the IRS proceeded to raid their place of business and their homes even though they had done absolutely nothing wrong. Speaker 42: On Saturday morning, 4 different raiding parties proceeded to raid 4 locations On a Saturday the day before Easter. Speaker 18: I was the manager on duty, and I was up in the deli, and People came through the door. Speaker 28: How many came through? It was maybe about 15 Speaker 18: to 20 people. Speaker 4: 15 to 20 armed agents. Speaker 18: With dogs, with guns. They made me get everybody everybody in the they went in the kitchen. They went in the deli. They went all over the whole restaurant, told told all the customers, took Forks out of their hands while they were eating their breakfast and told them they had to leave. Speaker 10: I got the frantic call from eating, And she says something's wrong, something wrong. So anyway, I jump out of bed and I immediately run to the shower. I'm in the shower And the next thing I know, I hear my son yelling, dad. Speaker 19: I went like this, and boom. I'm slammed against the door, and I fall down with a gun in my head, and they're like, where's Scottie Miller? And I'm like, dad. That's all I'm doing is yelling. I'm scared, frightened. Yeah. Speaker 10: And then the next thing I hear As mister Miller with the shirt the shower curtain has jerked back, I've got a gun pointed in my head. Hold it right there. The screams from the little girls, who were at a pajama party with my daughter. There's 4 little girls there with my daughter. Of course, mayhem. Speaker 26: There were about 3 men in my bedroom with huge guns. He followed us and wanted to watch us get dressed. And I tried to shut the door, and he puts his foot in the Speaker 18: door like he's gonna sit there and Speaker 26: watch us change our clothes and I was like, excuse me. No. Speaker 10: My neighbors now are all standing up. Were you still naked? Speaker 11: Well, they handed me a towel Speaker 10: at that point. I had a towel wrapped around me. Speaker 4: Do the towel fit? Speaker 10: Yeah. Hardly. At this point, you know, they were talking about weapons and, you know, and, I mean, it's crazy. I mean, they're looking everywhere. It Going through all my drawers, and I I reached for my underwear drawer to get some underwear. They said, don't Speaker 37: touch anything, Speaker 10: They're they're locking their guns up. Speaker 37: They hold Speaker 3: it right there. Speaker 37: Don't move around. Speaker 23: Don't move. Move. Speaker 10: I'm a woah. I said, just like to get some underwear on here. You know? I said, yeah. I got women standing here. Speaker 42: I said They keep everything. Speaker 4: How did you conduct your business if the IRS took everything? Speaker 42: We had to do it out of a shoebox so we could keep going because we requested these things, And I'm told that the government's really not, once they do raid and so forth, this is supposed to at least let you, until you're charged with something, continue your business. This wasn't the case. They kept everything. Speaker 4: So you were never even charged? Speaker 42: Absolutely not. Charged with what? And when you speak IRS, the whole world shrivels up. The whole world gets fearful to a point where let's not talk about it. I testified in front of congress. I would like to know why this dark entity known as The IRS has come into my life and refused to leave. I raised my children with a zero tolerance for dishonesty, and now they must hear allegations that I am a Major drug dealer and a tax cheat. A lot of people out there being abused and a lot of people saying, look, I'll pay it. Just go away. Speaker 3: Just go away. Speaker 18: When all that happened, we had to file bankruptcy. We had cars taken away from us, Kept my daughter from going to college. Speaker 42: Do they ever think about the lies that they just destroyed? They think about the ruination of homes and property. No, in this case, we would have never thought this could happen Speaker 4: to us. Speaker 3: We've never done anything wrong. Speaker 42: How can this happen in America when in my case, personally, I thought that I was doing everything right? I've served my country. I've been to college. At least I've done something in my life. I got a speeding ticket one time. I paid my taxes for 40, 50 years, whatever it was. I've never been audited. What happened here? Speaker 4: I had this really uncomfortable feeling in the pit of my stomach As I was thinking to myself, how did America transform itself from being a truly free country with a servant government Where our individual rights were protected by our constitution, to being a country that talked about being free but really wasn't. The change started when the Federal Reserve came into existence, and America adopted one of the major planks of the Communist Manifesto By bringing to America this central bank, the very same people that backed the Federal Reserve System also backed the graduated income tax, a 2nd plank from the Communist Manifesto. You know that the Federal Reserve is a private bank Not a government agency? Speaker 18: No. I wasn't aware of that. Speaker 3: It's a it's a private bank. That would scare me quite a bit. I wonder if you Speaker 4: learned that the Federal Reserve makes money off the taxes you pay. Would you feel about that? Speaker 18: Angry, like I'm feeling right now. Speaker 3: I would feel cheated by my government. I'd be angry. Kinda sucks. They're pretty much in control of everything. Speaker 4: I decided to drive back to Washington to see doctor Ron Paul. He had been a congressman for over 20 years. I had met him previously in 1998 when I was running for governor in Nevada, and I knew him to be an honest and sincere man. And I thought he'd be very helpful in letting me know what the future holds for the American people. Who owns the Federal Reserve? Speaker 5: It's secret, and we can't find out what's happening. So but the congress created it, and it's Not authorized in the constitution. Speaker 3: The government borrows money from a private corporation using the name federal that prints United States on it and then it pays back to the fed which is owned by private banks. We don't know who all those private banks are. The money that the government is paying back to the private bankers is the money that comes from you and me. Speaker 4: Why in the world would the American government borrow money and pay fees on it When it has the authority to make the money itself interest free. Speaker 3: The Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express. Never seen a full list of ownership for the Fed. I don't think anybody has. Speaker 29: The government works for a private bank, and the private bank works for its owners. Speaker 9: They're true masters. People talk Speaker 3: to me about, you know, the issue of Republican versus Democrat is that they don't get it. And I say, Look, here's the way you get it. It's organized crime. All you do is you call the Republicans, the Genoveses, and you call the Democrats, the Gambinos. The people at the top, they treat it like a crap game, like it's their crap game, Like they're making lots of money. Occasionally, somebody at the table shoots each other, but the moment anything threatens their crap game, they all unite to protect it. They're both controlled by the same financial, economic, and corporate interests. Once the banks get into the picture, and they form a partnership With the government, the government gives them the legal power now to create bank issued money backed by the Coercive power government to require everybody to accept that bank money. Speaker 5: In the course of the last century, They have converted this nation from a nation of independent freeholders to a nation of employees, Speaker 3: and they're just 1 step away from being Most people spend the great bulk of their money for taxes, interest and inflation. And all of that money goes to these 2 groups that comprise the cartel and their partner, the federal government. It's not a coincidence. Speaker 4: So if Congress used its legal authority to shut down the Federal Reserve System, the American people would be much better off. Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency. Creating and issuing money is a supreme prerogative of government and its greatest creative opportunity. Adopting these principles will save the taxpayers immense sums of interest, and money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity, Speaker 3: Abraham Lincoln. Young people today are conditioned from, practically from the cradle on up To think that credit is a wonderful thing. You don't wanna damage your credit. You wanna do what you can so that you can go to the bank and get a good loan. Speaker 5: There are no no people who own their own property, who own their own houses, who own their own business, who finance their own business, they're only debtors. Speaker 3: The average Young person today has no concept that he's being drawn into a web, a trap Like he's in the feudalist system, only he's going to like it. He's going to think this is wonderful. I got my new red Corvette And I'm in debt for the rest of my life, but I'm looking good. Speaker 29: A decision was made. You know, let's get all the debt up, let's move the jobs abroad, And instead of reengineering your skills, we're going to dumb down America, and so the middle class will disappear. Speaker 3: Really what, what most of the people in this country have become is, When Speaker 4: a person borrows money and puts a noose around their neck and makes them servant to the lender, which is exactly what the Federal Reserve System is designed to do. And now our Congress, so dominated by the banks, is helping them to entrap people even further by passing new bankruptcy laws, Making it more difficult for the people to declare bankruptcy and get a fresh start, while at the same time allowing the banks to charge very high rates of interest. This is the way the Democrats and Republicans, working with the banks, legally enslave the nation. Speaker 3: Credit card industry is a huge political contributor. And unfortunately, a certain number of Speaker 0: It just seems so, like I say, just bald. You know? This idea that Credit card industry gives a lot of money to the government, so they will protect them even to the just abject, disinterest of their own constituents. Speaker 3: That happens kind of a lot. The board of directors of the Federal Reserve System is chosen by the president From a list prepared by the bankers themselves. The process of finding a Greenspan replacement is ongoing and is being managed by a small group of people responsible for Coming up with a list of nominees. Speaker 2: It's important that whomever I pick, is viewed as an independent person from politics. Speaker 4: If the American people ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them Will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. Thomas Jefferson. So the Federal Reserve is actually an illegal entity functioning within government. It's illegal, and what we have given Speaker 5: to this So called agency is the authority to counterfeit money. Speaker 4: Do you have any points of view about the Federal Reserve and how the Federal Reserve operates? Speaker 5: They just entered something on a computer. Oh, you need $20,000,000,000 today. Here's $20,000,000,000, but they got that out of thin air. Speaker 20: It came out of Speaker 5: thin air. It goes to the treasury. The treasury then pays the bills. Speaker 4: So it's no different than monopoly money. The cost of living is so high today because the Federal Reserve and the Federal Government have destroyed the purchasing power of the dollar. The dollar today is actually worth about 4¢ despite the fact that the government, the Federal Reserve, and the media keep telling us That they're protecting the value of the dollar. This is a lie. Speaker 5: All countries who have ever attempted To create money on thin air, the the currency is eventually destroyed. Why did we give a monopoly of creating money out of thin air to a private corporation. The result is exactly the same as as if someone were picking your pocket every year because that's exactly what they're doing. Speaker 8: Originally, paper was a receipt, which is used as evidence that the money exists. Over the years, of course, the government has disconnected the paper from the actual tangible substance which is money. So now we have piece a piece of paper which is evidence of nothing. Nothing. Speaker 4: In the past, people were able to take their receipts, the paper, to the bank and get the real money, the gold, in exchange for the receipt. This limited the amount of money that could be printed, thereby protecting the purchasing power of your savings. Speaker 2: You don't have to worry. Speaker 7: That's good because I work 3 jobs, and I feel like I contribute. Speaker 2: You worked 3 jobs? Speaker 7: Three jobs. Yes. Speaker 2: Uniquely American in it. I mean, that is fantastic. Speaker 4: In the absence of the gold standard, There is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. Gold stands as a protector of property rights. Alan Greenspan, before he went to work for the Federal Reserve System. Now Alan Greenspan and the other central bankers want you to believe that the receipt, the paper, is the real money. This is nothing more than sleight of hand. It's a magician's trick. Because for them to maintain control over the government and the people, they have to convince you That this paper is really money because that is the essence of their power and our powerlessness, To maintain control over our own government. Speaker 42: What happens to Gold and Speaker 3: Fort Knox? Nobody really knows. When I served on Speaker 5: the Gold Commission, I asked them to Really, you know, do another audit. I remember it was 15 to 2 that said we don't need to audit the gold. Speaker 3: It's supposed to be the American American people's gold, and so we would like an accounting To tell the American people what is there I've been told Speaker 4: that the Federal Reserve has taken control of the gold as collateral for the dollars they print. Speaker 5: They miss gold on their balance sheet. Speaker 4: What happened to Federal Reserve, this private bank, miss on the balance sheet. Speaker 5: They claim they're holding that for the treasury. Speaker 4: So that puts private bankers in control of the American gold. They could have taken all of America's wealth. Speaker 3: That's a possibility. Speaker 4: Shouldn't the congress stand up and say, where is the American people's gold? They're not audited. They can show the money of America, And it's not audited? There is no audit. Wait a second. Speaker 3: Doesn't the Federal Reserve work underneath the Congress? Congress ignores their responsibility to, Do any oversight. The president really has no control nor does the Congress have any control over this cartel. It just has the appearance of control. Speaker 4: In the final analysis, the Federal Reserve Bankers, with the help of the Democrats and Republicans in Congress, have swindled the American people. They have taken the true wealth of America, the gold, and given us a piece of paper in return. And again, Not a word from the press. These frauds are going to continue until Congress is no longer intimidated by the fellow reserve bankers And congress uses their legal authority to shut down the Federal Reserve System and to stop this loss of our freedoms. Is there a law that requires people to file a 10 40? Speaker 3: Not explicitly, but, it's certainly implied. Well, Speaker 4: implied by force. Yeah. But is there a law? I Speaker 5: can't say Speaker 3: the law. No. I cannot. But, you know, If they think it's the law and they have all the guns, you know, it's an authoritarian approach. Well, yeah. But that's Yeah. Speaker 4: That's not that's not a country run by war. Do you think America is going deeper and deeper And to becoming a police state? And if so, in what ways do you see that as a congressman? Speaker 5: Yeah. I think we're moving in that direction because there's not much we can do without permission. The absence of a police state is that people are free and if you don't commit crimes, you can do what you want. But today, you can't open up a business. You can't develop land. You can hardly do anything. You can't go to the bank. You can't go to the doctor without the government knowing what you're doing. And, they talk about medical privacy, that's gone. Financial privacy, That's gone. The right to own property, that's essentially gone. So you have to get permission from the government from almost everything. And if that is the definition of a police state that you can't do anything unless the government gives you permission, we're well on our way. This is this is something that people eventually, I hope, will get sick and tired of and say, you know, enough is enough. Speaker 4: I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty Then standing armies, Thomas Jefferson. Speaker 3: You must understand the Federal Reserve is a cartel made up of the major banks in America. And they are the ones that are running the show, not the federal government. Speaker 1: Behind the system, the financial interests, are able to exercise a disproportionate amount of influence on Not only the economic structure of the country, but the political structure. Speaker 42: This would be like The ultimate reaching of government into our personal health lives, which would be unbelievable and not even our government, Some, you know, bureaucratic diffuse, multinational secretive government. Speaker 2: I just want to assure the American people that, one, I've got the authority to do this. American people expect us to protect them and Protect us of the liberties. I'm going to do that. Preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States. The constitution of the United States. So Speaker 1: What happens if your your own government is using more force and more coercion on its own citizens for the purpose of achieving its political ends. Is that government engaged in terrorism? Speaker 4: Now let's watch the government add insult to injury to the people of New Orleans. No one will be able to be armed. We will take all weapons. Speaker 43: That happened today in this wealthy neighborhood where homeowners had armed themselves to protect their mansions. Speaker 3: I don't know. I have to ask you. Speaker 43: Residents handcuffed on the ground. In the end, police took their weapons, but let them stay in their homes. Speaker 4: Wasn't that kind and generous of the government To allow people to stay in their own homes, how thoughtful. Of course, they couldn't defend themselves from looters. Speaker 43: For many of the police and guard Troops, it is an uncomfortable job to do this in an American city. Speaker 19: You never expect to do this in your own country. Speaker 3: Walking up and down these streets, You don't you don't wanna think about the stuff that you're gonna have to do? Speaker 15: We are losing our right to property. The the government is getting more pretext to seize it Using, you know, the power to confiscate with eminent domain. The asset forfeiture laws are proliferated. It's easier for the prosecutors to come in and make an accusation against do and confiscate your property even though they have no evidence that you've done anything wrong. Gilbert Innocence doesn't really matter that much because it's very convenient for the government. Speaker 3: Unfortunately, what is being sold to The American people today as Americanism, if you peel off the label, you find so much similarity To what we were fighting against when we were fighting communism and Nazism and fascism. Speaker 4: The government's now putting a national ID card together and they want checkpoints. Speaker 5: We will be carrying our papers, and they have recommended there'll be checkpoints, throughout the country. Speaker 4: Isn't that what Nazi Germany did that everybody in America was against? Papers, please. May I see your papers? Speaker 3: May you see your papers? I don't think I have them on me. In that case, we'd have to ask you to come along. Speaker 16: Wait. It's possible that, yes. Here we are. Speaker 3: These papers expired 3 weeks ago. You have to come Speaker 5: The new legislation that the the national ID card is in it. It takes 3 or 4 pages to describe, and it will be connected with our driver's licenses. The states will be instructed on exactly what they have to do. Social Security numbers will be used. Some type of physical proof such such as fingerprints or retinal prints have to be on it. Speaker 4: It is time to wake up, America, these ID cards are not about defeating terrorism, but they are all about controlling the American people. I arranged an interview with Catherine Albrecht, a leading authority on the RFID chip. Her book entitled Spy Chips is the definitive book on the subject. I wanted to find out just how dangerous these chips are to our liberties. Speaker 7: RFID is a technology that uses tiny computer chips size of a grain of sand or even smaller hooked up to miniature antennas to transmit information about items at a distance. Back in 1999, Procter and Gamble, Gillette, and MIT got together to find a way to commercialize this technology and make it small enough, Make it efficient enough and make it low cost enough to essentially, their dream is to put one of these tiny, computer chips on every physical item manufactured on Earth. The latest technology for identifying people at the point of sale, for identifying people when they make purchases, is actually the implantable chip that you can actually embed directly into human flesh. It's a tiny glass capsule about the size of a grain of rice. It contains an RFID computer chip with a coiled antenna, and it can transmit information also at a distance. Speaker 14: Can a microscopic tag being planted in a person's body to track his every movement. There's actual discussion about that. You will rule on that, mark my words, before your tenure is over. Speaker 7: Homeland Security folks, the Department of Defense, and others have expressed an interest in being able to more closely monitor the US Populous, and one way to do that, of course, would be being able to determine who buys what and, where they take those things. Radio waves can travel through walls. They can travel through wood. They can travel through the things we normally rely on to protect our privacy. For example, your purse, your backpack, your pocket, anything you're wearing or carrying. Craft Philadelphia cream cheese has been tagged with RFID and sold to consumers as have, Mach 3 razor products and other Gillette razor products without the knowledge of the consumer. One of the tiny chips could actually even be the the the dot on the letter I on the back of The fine print on a package that you purchase. They were talking about having reader devices in every airport, on every bus, on every train, on every port, on every doc. One of the most worrisome applications of RFID are proposals to put them into cash, meaning that you would be able to Track every banknote where it had been, who it had been issued to, and create in essence an audit trail that would that would, essentially take away the anonymity of cash we now enjoy today. The ATM machine itself as the money was came through the the roller device would be would be reading each number, And they would know who you are because of course you identify yourself at the bank before you take money out. And down the road when you go to pay, at a major retailer, It would also be possible for them as they're putting the money into the cash drawer to simply feed it through a little reader device. It would go in, it would tag that number and transfer possession from Aaron Russo, say to Walmart. Once everything you do is tied down to a single number and there is no longer the ability to pay with cash, then all it takes to render you a non citizen is to simply turn that chip off. You will no longer be able to really participate in any function in society, including by food. Speaker 4: So through the implementation of the Federal Reserve System, The American citizen has gone from being a private individual who had real money, gold in his possession that was private To a citizen who has no privacy because all money is now being digitized, they can deduct whatever amount of money they want out of your digits whenever they want. They can trace you whenever they want. You'll be at their mercy. God forbid we allow this to happen in America. Speaker 7: This is absolutely Orwellian. I mean, it's talking about big brother looking over your shoulder at absolutely everything you do, every purchase you make, every place you go, Speaker 20: Pizza Palace. Guaranteed hot in 30 minutes. It's free. This is Mary. May I take your order? Speaker 3: Hi, Mary. Yes. I'd like to order. Speaker 20: Is this mister Kelly? Speaker 3: Yes. Speaker 20: Thank you for calling again, sir. I see your national identification number as six 0204-999-98dash45dash54610. Is that correct? Speaker 3: Yes. Speaker 20: Thank you, mister Kelly. I see you live at 736 Montrose corporate. You're calling from your cell phone. Are you at home? Speaker 3: I'm just leaving work, but I'm Speaker 20: Oh, we can deliver to Bob's Auto Supply. That's at 175 Lincoln Avenue. Yeah? Speaker 3: No. I'm on my way home. How do you know all this stuff? Speaker 20: We just got wired into the system, sir. Speaker 3: Oh, well, I'd like to order a couple of your double meat special pizzas. Speaker 20: Sure thing. There'll be a new $20 charge for those, sir. Speaker 3: What do you mean? Speaker 20: Sir, the system shows me that your medical records indicate that you have high blood pressure and extremely high cholesterol. Luckily, we have a new agreement with your national healthcare provider that allows us to sell you double meat pies as long as you agree to waive all future claims of liability. Speaker 3: What? Speaker 20: Do you agree, sir? You can find the form when we deliver, but there is a charge for processing. The total is $67 even. Speaker 3: $67? That Speaker 20: includes the delivery surcharge of $15 to cover the added risk our driver of traveling through an orange zone. Speaker 3: I live in an orange zone? Speaker 20: Now you do. Looks like there was another robbery on Montrose yesterday. You could save $48 if you ordered our special Sprout Submarine combo and picked it up yourself. Comes with tofu sticks, those are Very tasty, sir. Good value too. Speaker 3: But I want double meat. Speaker 20: Well, I'm sure you can afford the $67 then. You just bought those tickets to Hawaii. They weren't cheap, Oh, but I see you checked out the budget beach bomb at the library last week. Up to you, sir. Speaker 3: Alright. Alright. I'll get the Sprout subs. Speaker 20: Good choice, sir. Gotta watch that waist if you're hitting the beach, Ang. 42 inches. Wow. Man, I'd say tofu and sprouts is, like, Required. Speaker 3: That's how much? Speaker 20: Just between you and me, there's a $3 off coupon in this month's Total Men's Fitness Magazine. Your wife Betty subscribes to that. Right? Anyhow, clip that and it's 19.99 even. Woah. Looks like you maxed out on all your credit cards. Bring cash. Okay? Speaker 4: Have we become so controlled and so ignorant about our rights? That big institutions and big government can do whatever they want with us, Even without our approval, I knew for certain the founding fathers would resist to the death what is happening in America today. And I, for 1, will not accept a national ID card. And if nobody accepts a national ID card, and nobody can board a plane with that one, Then let the airlines go bankrupt. And if you can't open a bank account in a big money center bank, then open account in a small local bank. And if we can't walk into a federal building, I personally would consider that a blessing. Don't allow these institutions to dictate to us How we conduct our lives. This is America, and we have free choice. We the people have all the power, not the government. Government gets its power from us, Not the other way around. Think of all the men and women who died in all our wars, fighting for freedom, Not Federal Reserve Bankers. Do you think they sacrificed their lives so that Americans could be chipped like a dog? So we could all have a homing device inside us? No. This ID card is the last step before they implant us. And that's precisely the reason nobody should accept 1. And do you know what they're gonna do? They're gonna call in the propaganda machine, the media, And try and sell this as if we're in everybody's best interest. Speaker 44: We're working on a product that we have called internally a PLD. PLD LD stands for personal locating device, which is an implantable GPS for which our company owns a patent. The hybrid of the 2 of these products, being Digital Angel and Verichip is what we call PLD. PLD should be in prototype form by the end of this here by December of 2002, and we are already working with the Food and Drug Administration as well as legislative agencies with these products and Ultimately, with the PLD. Speaker 29: We have a Florida family who are really pioneers in a brave new world. They have volunteered to be the 1st ever To have microchip identification devices implanted into their body. Speaker 20: After 9/11, I was really concerned, with the security of my family. Speaker 3: I wouldn't mind having something planted permanently in my arm that would identify me. Speaker 4: Talk about identification papers. Watch what happens to a woman in Florida whose license was suspended. Speaker 45: Get out of the car or Speaker 3: I am going to tase you. Speaker 45: The next street off the street. Speaker 3: On your stomach. Do it now. Put your hands behind your back. Do it now. Do it now or you're gonna get tased again. Do it now. Speaker 45: Put your hands behind your back. I can't. Under the camp. Uh-oh. Uh-oh. Speaker 3: Oh, god. You got blood on your Speaker 45: Oh my god. You know you've paid me and you handcuffed me? Speaker 3: Yep. You're under arrest. Speaker 45: For what reason? Speaker 3: Your license is suspended. Speaker 1: All the power is in the people. And to the extent that government becomes alienated from the people, does things that people don't want, power is transferred till you finally come to a police state, totalitarian whatever word you wanna give it, where the desires of the people really have no no consequence. Speaker 3: They go out and they vote. Doesn't make any difference which candidate they elect. Speaker 23: I'm a programmer. I worked for NASA, worked for ExxonMobil, Speaker 4: Work for, Speaker 23: Department of Transportation. Mister Curtis, are there programs Speaker 6: that can be used to secretly fix elections? Yes. How do you know that to be the case? Speaker 23: Because in October of 2000, I wrote a prototype for president congressman Tom Feeney At the company I worked for in Oviedo, Florida that did just that. Speaker 6: And when you say did just that, Speaker 23: it would rig an election? It would flip the vote 5,149, Whoever you wanted to go to and whichever race you wanted to win. Speaker 6: And would that program that you design be something that elections officials That might be on County Boards of Elections could detect? They never see it. So how would such a program, a secret program that fixes the election, how could it be detected? Speaker 23: You would have to view it either in the source code, or you have to have a receipt and then count the hard paper against the actual boat total. Speaker 6: Given the availability of such boat rigging software And the testimony that has been given under oath of substantial statistical anomalies, it grows This difference is between exit polling data and the actual tabulated results. Do you have an opinion whether or not Ohio election the the And anything with regards to business units? Absolutely none. Speaker 3: Anybody who trusts Electronic voting machine should have their head examined. Speaker 2: Now we can see a new world coming into view, a world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. Speaker 4: The new world order will be built An end run on national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault, Council on foreign relations. We shall have world governments whether or not we'd like it. The only question is Whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent, Paul Warburg, council on foreign relations and architect of the Federal Reserve System. Speaker 5: Here's a group that get together internationally, Speaker 18: and they Speaker 5: sort of play God with Our money Speaker 38: from Yes. Speaker 4: That's part of what George Bush said was the one world order. Speaker 5: They can't have a new world order, only with, You know, a world police, military Right. I think the financial system ultimately is even more important than the guns. Speaker 4: The central bankers of the world are working together to create a one world government, a global police state as sinister As anything George Orwell ever wrote about, where every person on the planet earth will have an RFID chip implanted, Where the bankers and the governments command every transaction you make. Speaker 3: A chip and everybody would be the universal monetary system par excellence because there'd be no escape from it, and you'd be totally under the control of those who issue the electronic impulses in that chip. Speaker 4: Their strategies are being accomplished through the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund, and the Bank For International Settlements, which is the central bank For all the central banks of the world, most people don't have a clue that these unelected private bankers actually control The governments of the world, they have financed and profited from every war since World War I without concern for humanity. The war in Iraq is an attempt by the fellow reserve and their partner, the Bank of England, to control the Middle East and to make it a part of the New World Order. To defend the New World Order, US soldiers will have to kill and die, Arthur Schlessinger, A councilor on foreign relations. Military men are just dumb, Stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy, Henry Kissinger, Council on Foreign Relations. Now let's listen to this quote by Robert Reich, a member of president Clinton's cabinet and one of his most trusted advisers. The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress are irrelevant. America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve. America's foreign policy is now being run by the International Monetary Fund. When the president decides to go to war, he no longer needs a declaration of war from congress. Doctor Carol Quigley, professor from Georgetown University, who was also president Clinton's mentor, Said in his book, tragedy and hope, the powers of financial capitalism had a far reaching aim. Nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. And then president Clinton's deputy secretary of state, Strobe Talbot, said, in the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete. All states will recognize a single global authority. All these supposed free trade agreements, NAFTA, GATT, CAFTA are truly nothing more than the governments of the world and the central banks working together to create a one world government. They are not free trade. These treaties are government managed trade, and they are destroying the American worker. Through these treaties, the bankers are actually beginning to control The laws of the world. The fact is that this relationship between the bankers, the government, and the huge multinational corporations is the very reason why the government no longer enforces its immigration laws. The bankers want a one world government without borders, And the American government is obeying them. If the government was so worried about terrorism, why they're leaving the borders open? But at the same time, telling American citizens they need an ID card with an RFID chip. Speaker 46: The Bush Administration's Open Borders policy and its decision to ignore the enforcement of this country's immigration laws is part of a broader agenda. President Bush signed a formal agreement that will end the United States as we know it. And he took the step without approval from either the US Congress or the people of the United States. Bill Tucker reports. Speaker 47: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America sounds benign, hardly like a policy that critics call NAFTA on steroids. It's a deal that few have even heard of. Speaker 18: It's being done again by very few people at the very top on behalf of the investment class, but the Working class of people, political officials across our country from communities, from cities, and so forth, they don't know anything about this. Speaker 47: Yet it was agreed to by Mexico's president Fox, Canada's prime minister Martin, and president Bush in 2005. Administration officials counter their critics by saying Everything about SPP is on the White House website, and they say the partnership is not a treaty, but more of an outline authorities between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Still, some wonder why there haven't been public discussions about the goals being pursued. Speaker 46: You know, I I was asked the other day, about whether or not I really thought the American people Had the stomach The stand up and stop this nonsense, this direction from a group of elites in absolute contravention of our law, of our constitution, Every national value. And I hope, I pray that I'm right when I said Yes. But this is this is beyond belief. Speaker 4: Look what happened in Europe. The people that voted down the European constitution wanting each country to stay sovereign. Yet the private central bankers are pushing the governments forward to make this constitution happen even though the people voted against us and clearly do not want a rural government nor one European government. Now pay close attention to this quote by David Rockefeller, And you understand what is happening in the world today and where the American people are heading as a nation. We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world If we had been subjected to the likes of publicity during those years, but now the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries. David Rockefeller, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, actually believes that we would be better off If he and his bank of friends ran the world. Speaker 3: Benito Mussolini had a great quote about fascism. He said that Fascism should be called corporatism more properly, because it's the perfect merger of power between the corporation and the state. That's how we define fascism. And that's what we're seeing here. The media, controls the information that a person gets. In various ways, they can make sure that the average American watching the tube or reading the newspaper, is going to come out with a certain mindset. It's going to say, this is good, that's bad, and that's all they have to do. You look at the ownership of Corporate media in this country. Who owns CBS? Viacom? Who owns NBC? GE? Who owns ABC? Disney? Speaker 15: Americans have been taught to expect Salvation from government instead of recognizing government as a as the most dangerous threat they'll face in their lives. Speaker 3: The United States putting together a constitution now for Iraq. You know, why don't we just give Mars? I mean, think about it. It served us well for over 200 years, and we don't appear to be using it anymore. So Speaker 5: I like the old idea where you could do what you thought you could do, and what you wanted to do As long as you didn't hurt other people. Speaker 3: I think that the ultimate choice that's being presented to mankind is that it's time to either evolve or Perish. Grow up or die. Become adults. Act like adults. Take some responsibility. Speaker 27: Freedom to Fascism. That's a pretty in your face title, and from the bits I've seen already of This documentary, you should be making a lot of waves. It's being compared in advance to Fahrenheit 911. Just give an overview of what you're trying to do, a summary of what you're trying to do in this movie, and then we can get into some specifics. Speaker 18: Well, I Speaker 4: think what I'm I mean, what I'm trying to do is obviously is wake America up. That's I use that title because that to me is the truth. It's the honest title. A lot of people said don't say fascism because it's gonna scare people, You know, but the truth is that it is fascism that's happening in America. Only people don't know what fascism really means. Fascism is actually The work the synergistic effort of big government and big corporations working together to stifle the people, and that's what we have in America today. I mean, if you asked Mussolini what fascism was, he would say it's really corporatism. You know, I think it was Tolstoy who said Fascism is capitalism in decay. Speaker 11: You know? Speaker 27: Yeah, it's corporatocracy. Is that another word Speaker 4: they use for it? Yes. Exactly. So what's happened in America is that the corporations have taken over, And the largest corporation of all is the Federal Reserve System. And people don't think of the Federal Reserve System as being a corporation Speaker 18: I think it's Speaker 27: A formal governmental entity. Speaker 4: Exactly. I think it's a government agency, and it's not. It's a cabal. It's a partnership between the government and this private bank. And this private bank is a Delaware corporation who in 1913 was given the authority, the concession, so to speak, to make money for America, to issue money, issue dollars. Up to that point, it was the government that could do that and local banks that could do that. And money had a gold and silver backing. And what happened was in 1913, the Fed took that power away from the government or the government gave it to them. Speaker 27: Mhmm. Did a deal Speaker 4: with the banking industry? Right. They did a deal with the private bankers the Rothschilds and the Rockefellows and all those people. And by doing that, the government, when it needed money, now had to borrow it from the Fed and pay interest on the money. And they brought the income tax into being then so the interest to these bankers could be paid. So essentially, because of this corruption, this fraud, The bank has got the right to make money, and the American people had to be taxed so they could pay the bank, so the government could pay the bankers the interest. Whereas if the government made the money, There'd be no interest to pay. And if it had the gold backing that it's supposed to have, it would limit the amount of money that could be printed. You see, so, in 1913, the change began to evolve in America. And in a way, my movie could be called the 2 frauds of 1913 the IRS, You know, the income tax and the Federal Reserve, yes. Speaker 26: There are Speaker 27: so many roads to go down. One of them you were talking about was it did limit the growth by having actual Gold, an actual gold backed currency. Most people don't understand, we do not have a gold backed currency anymore. Do you want to talk about that a little bit? Speaker 4: Well, we can. I mean, I don't know if people find that interesting. Speaker 16: Well, I Speaker 27: find it interesting. I mean, everyone thinks we have Fort Knox filled with gold, and That's basically, the backing to our currency, that we're stable. Can you Speaker 7: talk about the truth? Speaker 4: Sure. The truth is, is that, first of all, There probably is no gold in Fort Knox. I say probably, even though I'm sure there isn't. I say probably because I have not been in there to see it for myself. But what's happened is the Treasury, which owns the gold on behalf of the American people, has given the gold to the Federal Reserve, these private bankers, as collateral for the dollars these bankers print out of thin air. So the bankers have basically swindled With the cooperation of the Congress and the government, the bankers have swindled the American people by taking all our wealth to gold and giving us a piece of paper that ultimately has no value. It's just a piece of paper with no backing to it. And it's just A situation where the people of America don't understand that because they believe that gold still backs the dollar Well, silver still backs the dollar, and it doesn't, not in any way. So what you have is what's called a fiat currency. And this fiat currency, The Federal Reserve can make out of thin air all they want. And because the firm Paper's cheap. Speaker 27: Ink is too. Speaker 39: Oh, you Speaker 4: don't even things, you don't even need the ink anymore. Let let's say each dollar $100 printed costs 3¢. Okay? Well, now you don't even have to spend the 3¢ because they just use digits on a computer. Mhmm. So you don't even have paper anymore. You just have these digits. And it's because of this Ability of the Federal Reserve to print money out of thin air or to make digits out of thin air, and they call it money, It gives them the power to control the government because whoever makes the money makes the rules. That's the name of the game. So they can own everything they want. Everybody's America has gone From being a nation of people who own their own property, own their own businesses, to a nation in debt because all money is created by borrowing, and this country has become people who just live by borrowing. What's my credit report? How much can I borrow this week? Much can I pay you off this week? People don't own their own houses anymore. For this very reason, in the old days, you know, if if you wired money, you you wanted to pay it off as soon as possible. Now what people look to do is to have the lowest monthly payment they can get. They don't think they're ever owning their own house. Speaker 27: Right. Speaker 4: You know? And it's all based on a credit system excuse me, Mike. It's all based on a credit system because the Federal Reserve System is one that encourages debt. That's why you get credit cards in the mail all the time, borrow money, you know, go to college, borrow money, they bring you into the system at a very early age. And once you get into debt, you never get out, basically, between taxes, the income tax, the interest on your debt, and inflation, you can't get out from under. It's it's it's very difficult for anybody, unless you're very, very wealthy, to ever survive in this country and and own anything Always in debt. Think of the 3 i's, interest payments are very high, income taxes, and inflation. Inflation is the silent tax People don't recognize the loss of their purchasing power. If you look at the dollar bill from the time the Federal Reserve came into being till today, The dollar is now worth about $0.04 from $1. I mean, houses today It's been Speaker 27: in my lifetime. Yeah. Speaker 4: I mean, houses today cost $1,000,000. Nothing. Speaker 27: And the Speaker 4: old my father bought his house in 1954. Speaker 27: $4,000? No. Speaker 4: It was 27,000. Okay? And Long Island in a very wealthy neighborhood. Well, that wasn't we were middle class. We were middle class. Well, he had a home for $27,000 in a nice suburb of New York, you know? That was $27,000 in 1954, 'fifty five, and the house just resold again, not from him, but I was out there visiting it, And the guy who just bought the house just paid over $1,100,000 for it. Same house, no different. So the value the dollar value of that house has gone up, what, 50 times in 50 years. That's because they print so much money. Inflation, the higher prices of things come because they print so much money. Speaker 27: And we all buy into it. Speaker 4: Well, you have to buy into it. You have no choice anymore. That's why I made this movie. You really don't have a choice as long as you have. Speaker 27: That's true. In a lot of ways, we don't have a choice. In other ways, we have our own decisions to make as consumers, and we choose to go beyond our means also. Yes. In addition to that, we're we're exacerbating the the problem, but this is all by design. Speaker 4: But you're taught that, and it is by design. You're taught that because it is by design. Speaker 27: And let's talk about the by design part of it. This isn't an accident that We found ourselves in this condition. Speaker 4: It's slavery. It's serfdom. I mean, just just take a look. You know, the, Democrats and Republicans in congress, right, have just allowed the Sparrow Reserve System to come into being, and now they're letting the banks charge Usurice rates of interest owe it 20, sometimes 30% on the money you borrow, and yet they make they they change the bankruptcy laws, so it's much more difficult to get out of debt. So they're making you debtors for life. Everything is always on behalf of the banks. It's It's always on behalf of the Federal Reserve. You you have these high rates of interest, and at the same time, right, You can't declare bankruptcy anymore. They make it very difficult. Speaker 27: You're in the little mill. Speaker 4: You're you're you're you're in the on the spin you're the hamster on the wheel. Speaker 27: Yeah. For life. Let's talk about why and the entities that have really helped set this up long term to have people in the little hamster melt of life. Speaker 4: Well, it's set up. I mean, it came about because the bankers but there's been a fight throughout history. I mean, Andrew Jackson fought the fight. Thomas Jefferson fought the fight. You know, the bankers have always wanted to control the country because they're very clever and very smart people. And they knew that if they could ever get the government to give them the right to issue the money, they would control the government. They would control the laws of the nation. That's why even today, you look at the immigration laws, you look what's happening with immigration in America. Why is it happening? On one hand, people say we had this nineeleven attack We have to get ID cards for people, RFID chips. Everybody has to be identified. They have to go to the airport. They have to be searched. Speaker 27: Right. Speaker 4: Right? Everything is we got Security's foremost in in everybody's mind. Right? On the other hand, I know if I were the president And 911 came, the first thing I would do was shut off the borders so nobody come in there. So on one hand, they're telling Americans they have to be controlled with ID cards and RFID d chips and wanting to chip people. And on the other hand, they're letting everybody come into the border. Terrorists, whoever wants to come in, can just walk over the border and come into the country. So you know it's a lie. It's not about terrorism. It's about the banks controlling the country and the world working together. This is about the bankers wanting a one rule government without borders. That's why everybody's able to come through the borders. It's not about security at all. And so the situation we're facing today is we have a government that's controlled by the Federal Reserve System, And the Federal Reserve System has this appearance of credibility, and Alan Greenspan is the greatest guy in the world and now Bernanke. You know, all these guys, the Federal Reserve, you got to have the Federal Reserve. But in reality, the Federal Reserve was part of the Communist Manifesto. They talk about America having, being a capitalistic society, you know, but yet you have a central bank that makes all the decisions. That's not capitalism. It's a fraud. It's a lie. They they they deceive the people, and and they put out all this spin, all this Press. You know, the Federal Reserve is the greatest thing in the world, and they're gonna protect us, and they're gonna make sure there's no more depressions in this country. What they've done Is destroy the currency of this country, and they've taken all our gold while destroying the currency. And at some point, they're gonna probably pull the plug and create the greater depression. Speaker 27: And we're talking about the silent hand behind the powers that we see on the news. Speaker 4: Yes, totally. There's no question That the banker who the bankers control, whether it's George Bush or Hillary Clinton or whoever it is, it doesn't matter, Democrat or Republican, It's irrelevant. You know? That and that that's why, like, Michael Moore's movie, even though I enjoyed his movie and I I respected what he did as a filmmaker, I thought he did a very good job with that movie even though I didn't agree with everything he said. Mhmm. Speaker 18: You know, Speaker 4: I thought as just as a filmmaker, pure filmmaker, he did a good job. He got his points across. But on the other hand, what he did do was play into what the powers that be want him to play into. Speaker 7: How so? Speaker 4: He played into it because it was Democrat versus Republican. Speaker 27: Keeping it more local Speaker 4: than the way Speaker 27: he is, There's a smaller Speaker 4: No. No. No. No. No. Keeping it polarized. Speaker 27: Polarized. Right. Speaker 4: Not smaller. Not bigger. Keeping it polarized. Red state versus blue state, Liberal versus conservative, Democrat versus Republican. Yes. Michael Moore played into the system. And what the what the people want to happen. They want people looking at Democrats and Republicans and fighting over that Mhmm. Red states and blue states Mhmm. But not looking at the Federal Reserve as the real answer. So they hide behind that. It's like The Wizard of Oz. The guy behind the curtain Speaker 5: that curtain. Speaker 4: The guy behind the curtain, the guy behind the curtain is the Federal Reserve. Well, it's really it's not even the Federal Reserve so much as the people behind the Federal Reserve. They use the Federal Reserve as a tool so they can control things. So what Michael Moore did was, you know, he increased the tension in America. You know, he kept the polarization alive, Which is what the people behind the curtain want. And I don't think he did that because intentionally, I think he did it because that's his point of view. Right. And he doesn't know what the people behind the curtain, You know? And and my picture is more about where the real power lies. It's not Democrats and Republicans. They're just puppets. Right. And my movie goes after the system and how the system is functioning and operating today and what's really going down, why people are so dissatisfied and unhappy in America and around the world. And, we try to address those issues and how to stop it from happening, You know? And so, what's happening is and it's not only in America now. Right. I mean, we have the Faroes Air system here, but there are central banks all over the world, and they all work together. You know? Speaker 27: Matter if it's China. Mhmm. It doesn't matter if it's Britain. Speaker 4: Well, I I I I I can't speak for China, but I can tell you, Britain, you're right. It doesn't matter. And most most of the industrialized west, It doesn't matter. It's all central banks controlling the governments. And the central banks make secret agreements with each other. Like, you know, our Congress, Like the Central Bank in America the other day said, there's this thing called M3. I don't want to get too technical here, but M3 is basically A measure of the money supply. The bigger the growth of the money supply, the less the dollar is worth. It loses value. The more you print the more you have of something less it's worth, right? And so now they've decided they're not going to publish the figures of M3 anymore. They don't want people to know how much money they're printing. Speaker 27: And then And Speaker 4: that's something we have every right to know. Speaker 27: Yes, we do. And we have large concerns. They hit that Magic number, was it last month, the $8,300,000,000,000 Speaker 4: That's just part of the debt. Yeah. But Speaker 26: That's part of it. But that's Speaker 27: a that was a big That's a big point to hit, isn't it? Speaker 4: There's unfunded we have unfunded liabilities in this country of over $70,000,000,000,000. The $8,300,000,000 is just a portion of that. Speaker 27: Yeah. Speaker 4: You know? So the real question is, there's so much debt in this country, they've got to keep things afloat. Speaker 5: Mhmm. Speaker 18: So they Speaker 4: have to keep printing tons and 1,000,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 of dollars. And it's getting so massive, they don't want to let us know how much they're printing. And, we have no way to measure how fast we're going to lose the purchasing power of our money. And then on the other hand, if they choose to stop printing money, they can cause the biggest depression that ever happened in this country in the world. And it's all in these guys' power. I don't want to give them that power. Speaker 27: Right. Speaker 4: And it's unconstitutional and strong. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, the founders of this country, Fought against having a central bank. It was one of the main objects that they fought against. And so we have this central bank controlling us and controlling the laws of the nation. And now you see the government talking about these RFID chips going and everything that can track you wherever you go. It's going to be on your license your driver's license by May 2008. They're telling the states Speaker 12: you have Speaker 4: to put these chips in the driver's license. It's supposed Speaker 18: to be Speaker 27: in credit cards. It's to be in everything in Speaker 39: the future. Speaker 4: And they're going to chip people with it. They're going to put it into your bodies. Speaker 27: Right. And none in our bodies, in our wallets, You walk through Speaker 4: a turn Speaker 27: but you walk through a turnstile, and you have a a barcode on something. The transaction's done. Speaker 4: Of course. But but I'm saying to you that Speaker 18: And then Speaker 4: It goes in stages first. So you can have it on your driver's license. You can have it on your car, but, eventually, it's gonna end up in your hand. Speaker 30: Yes. Speaker 4: Right. It's going to end up in here. So you're going to have a homing device built into you. They can track you wherever they want to track you, wherever you want. Speaker 27: If you have a cell phone or if you have a GPS system in your car, they can do that anyway. They can. It's just making it a lot easier. Speaker 4: Well, I mean, you chip night, you're going to be chipped like a dog. If I don't want to be chipped, I'm not going to be chipped. But the fact is, is that you're not going to be able to start your computer, or you're not going to be able to have a bank account. And if you're chipped, and all money now becomes digitized, they can take the chips out of you whenever they want to. I mean, they can take your money from you whenever they want to. You have no say. Speaker 12: And this is inside You Speaker 4: owe us this much money. You owe us this much money, and they just take it out of your digits. Speaker 18: Right. Speaker 4: You know? So instead so you have no privacy left. You know? I mean, if I don't wanna have a cellphone, I can throw it away. If I don't want GPS in my car, I can get rid of it. Speaker 18: Right. Speaker 4: Once they wanna implant you in it and there's no more money, there's no more cash and you're in a cashless society, you have to have that chip. And if you want to buy food, right, so and if they If you're a pro if you protest like I do, if you fight what they're doing, they can just turn off my chip. I can't even buy food. I can't pay my bills. Right? It's total control. It's slavery. Speaker 18: It's slavery. Speaker 4: It's slavery. And the central bankers are doing that. And I'm not prepared to allow them to do it. That's why I made this movie. I want people to wake up and know what's really happening in this country and the world. That's what that what happened in Europe recently. They voted down the they voted down the European constitution. Right? But then that's stopping. They're going forward anyway because they want first, they want to put the world into blocks, the Europeans, the Asians, the Americas, into 3 and then they want to bring it all together. I mean, it's a one world government. Even voting has no more. It doesn't mean anything. I mean, think about your government. You want to live in a government where you have a say. That's why they say local government is the best government because you have a voice. And now in America today, in the federal government, you know you have no voice. You have nothing to say. Imagine a world government. What are you gonna be able to say? Nothing. Nobody's gonna listen to you. It's a it's just a tool for these people. You're a tool. You're a hamster, and they're gonna suck you dry and spit you out. They don't care about you. Speaker 27: And you're a revenue source, and I wouldn't mind getting into that because you Speaker 11: came out with both Speaker 18: guns firing about the IRS and the legality of the IRS. This is huge. Speaker 27: Right. I about the IRS and the legality of the IRS. This is huge. I've been reading about it for years, but I kept thinking, okay. I see what they're saying. However, they can still throw you in jail. Yes. Can you talk about the whole fraud of the IRS? Speaker 4: Yeah. I will in a second. But you said something about being a revenue source, which reminded me of something. Okay. I was friendly with 1 of the Rockefellers. Okay? And, he said to me one day, which just blew my mind. He said, Aaron, remember that whole thing with Women's Lib when it was the Biggest thing I saw in all the magazines and television, women's lib. Women have a right to work just like they had a right to vote, and you make sure that you have a right to work, and they fight for women's live with the right woman's right to work. He says, we were promoting that whole thing, you know, the council on foreign relations, because we want to get the women in the workforce. We want to be able to tax them. That's why you're certain all the newspapers all the time. And and and the added plus was Then they had to put their kids in child care and to schools early so we can control their minds at a young age. That's what that was all about. You called it women's lib, you know? But it was about Giving us control, and nobody realized that. Speaker 27: And now we got it. Now women are as exhausted as men. They're on the treadmill. Speaker 4: We're dealing with very diabolical people, very devious diabolical people who are incredibly intelligent, who control the money They control the army. They control the government. And, it's very hard to stop them. And the way to stop them, in my view and it could be done Even though we're very close to it to losing this game Speaker 18: You're at Speaker 27: a point of no return. Speaker 4: Yeah, we're very close to that. But the way to do it is to shut down the Federal Reserve System, To have all Americans, while we still have a chance, you see, con Congress has the legal authority to shut down the Federal Reserve. Right? Speaker 18: But if Speaker 27: they don't have the courage to do it Well, Speaker 4: because how do we? Well, because if we mass We protest it and tell every politician, you know, you you that you have to listen to the world of people, not to the world of Federal Reserve Bankers, and we're gonna vote you out of office unless you sign an affidavit saying you're going to shut down the Federal Reserve System. And that will be the litmus test on who to vote for, not whether they're Democrats, Not whether they're Republicans, but will you sign an affidavit saying, I will shut down the I will be part of shutting down the Federal Reserve System. I will vote to shut it down. And drop all the other issues, whether it's gun control or environment or whatever, because nothing's gonna matter if you don't get rid of the Federal Reserve. Speaker 18: Right. Speaker 4: If you can get if we can get everybody just focused on the Federal Reserve System like a laser beam and drop all the other stuff temporarily and just shut them down, you'll have a chance of saving the country. You know? That's what it's gonna take. And we can still do it because congress has the authority to do it, And congress needs you and me to vote for them to get back into office. Speaker 27: But for this to happen, we have to, It's up to also you and me, and many others, to begin educating the public as to what we're really up against. Like Speaker 4: Which is why I made the movie. Speaker 27: Exactly. Which is, I just Totally applaud you on that. Let's go can we go into the IRS? Speaker 4: Let's talk Speaker 27: about it. That's huge. Speaker 4: Well, the IRS is huge, but don't forget, the IRS is just part of the Federal Reserve System problem. And in actuality, There is no law. I've I've researched this very thoroughly, because I kept hearing for years, there's no law that you have to pay, and I sort of pooh poohed it all. Yeah. I do. And they make you think anybody says that's a wacko and a kook, you know, but there is no law. Let me just say straight out. There is no law that requires you to file a 10 40. I researched this and I'll tell you why there's no law. First of all, the constitution says that there's 2 kinds of taxation, Direct taxes and indirect taxes. A direct tax must be apportioned and done by census, which means that a direct tax, which is what a tax on your labor would be with a direct tax, you can't get away from it, right? A direct tax on your labor would have to be a portion, being divided amongst all the people equally, right? And an indirect tax It's like an excise tax. It's like, a tax that you don't have to pay if you don't use the service. Speaker 27: Luxury car or something. Speaker 4: Well, not even a luxury car came in late, but like gasoline. If you don't want to drive a car, if you want to take a bicycle, you don't buy gas, you don't pay the tax. So that's called an indirect tax. But that indirect tax has to be the same In every state, it has to be uniform. Okay? So there's 2 kinds of taxes, direct and indirect, in the Constitution. In 18/94, they tried to pass an income tax on your labor. The Supreme Court said you can't do that, it's unconstitutional, and they stopped. In 1913, to get around that power decision of 18/94, They they passed the 16th Amendment, which said we can tax any income from any place for the rest of forever, okay? And Once they passed that tax, then people started paying an income tax on the land. It became it became a third form of taxation. Mhmm. Speaker 18: You Speaker 4: had direct Apportion tax, you had the indirect tax, and now you had a direct tax that was unapportioned, okay? So you had 3 forms of taxation now. But Two things. The amendment was never ratified properly. It was a fraud, okay, And that's been proven. But the 2nd point is this. Even if it wasn't a fraud and had been ratified properly, even if it had been, The Supreme Court, in 8 different decisions that I have researched, said the 16th Amendment gave the government No new power of taxation. They can't tax the labor of the American people, so It was finished. And in 1917, they stopped taxing, so they did it for 3 years, right? And so there is no tax on the labor of the American people no legal tax and no constitutional tax. So they've made the the IRS code Right? Says whatever it says. But whatever it says is irrelevant because it's not in compliance with the Supreme Court decisions. Speaker 27: Right. Speaker 4: Right? Speaker 16: Mhmm. And Speaker 4: so and even the IRS code, if you actually examine it, okay, even though it's irrelevant, doesn't comply with the Supreme Court. Speaker 3: Mhmm. Speaker 4: Actually, if you examine it, there's there's still no law that makes you pay tax on your labor. Speaker 27: Right. Yet every one of us most well, I guess there are, what, 970,000,000 Americans who don't. But most of the rest of us are on the treadmill, and we're paying dutifully our taxes on time each year. Speaker 4: Well, they make you feel if you don't pay it, you're not a good citizen. That's part of their propaganda. Wow. And that's what allows them to keep spending money. Speaker 27: But in fact, it's not just you saying this. What I found very, Compelling in your film is that you're talking with former IRS agents and investigators, who were put to the task of finding out on behalf of inquiries, as to whether or not this was a legal practice, only to find out that it wasn't legal. And in fact, some of these people who were formerly with the IRS have not paid their taxes since they found out about this. Speaker 4: Right. Now There are many IRS agents, former agents, who have left the IRS Because they did the research and they were in there before I was. And they deserve to be honored for the work they've done, because it's a giant in my opinion, it's a giant scam. And It takes Speaker 27: a lot of courage to do that, though, because what are we still up Speaker 3: Well, the Speaker 4: thing is, they were up against the police state because what they'll do is, even though there's no law, they threaten people with harm, you see? When I interviewed the IRS commission or the ex IRS commission who wrote the tax code, he was general counsel to the IRS, He was the commissioner to the IRS and he wrote the tax code. Okay? His name is Sheldon Cohen. And I interviewed him for the movie. And in the movie, he says, Supreme Court decisions are inapplicable to the IRS. Speaker 27: Mhmm. Interesting. And what what does he give He Speaker 4: has not just because he because I put him into a corner. He couldn't answer the questions. So he was forced at the end to say, It doesn't you know, the Supreme Court decisions don't matter, which we all know is a lie. Right. So the IRS is not beyond the Supreme Court. So there is no law that allows the government to have a direct, unapportioned tax On your labor now, an income tax is defined by the Supreme Court as a corporate gain. You see, there is an income tax, but it's not a tax on your labor. An income tax is actually a tax on gains by corporations. That's the definition of an income tax in the eyes and the versus Macumbray case, if anybody wants to go look it up, right? And so, yeah, there's an income tax, but it's not a tax on you. It's a tax on corporations. Speaker 27: Right. And this has been pressed this was pressed with many administration, including the Clinton administration as well as now. And so, it really does cut across political boundaries. And, can you talk a little bit about the background? You have a bite in there, a sound bite in there from -Uh, Judge Emmett Sullivan? -Yes. -Can you tell about how that came about? It was really just a shocking statement. Speaker 4: Well, what happened was that there's this group called We the People, and, they served a petition on the government For the government to show the war that they're enforcing, we have a right to petition. Under the First Amendment, people have a right to petition their government to get answers to things. The government is the servant of the people, not the other way around. So they petitioned the government to get answers. And the government refused to answer the question about where the law is. So So they went to court. And this is Judge Sullivan, and said in his decision that the government does not have to answer the people's questions about where the law is. Speaker 27: Now that is beyond chilling. Speaker 4: Yes. Just there's no we don't have a constitution anymore. We don't have a government run by the people anymore. We live in a totalitarian country today. That's the bottom line. We live in totalitarianism. And if you want to get it back, We have to get rid of the Federal Reserve System. We have to make people have the control of their government again. Speaker 27: Before we're all chipped? Speaker 4: Before we're all chipped. I see. I know I'm not going to get take an ID card, you know? And nobody should take an ID card, Even if it's in your driver's license, you know, they're going to what they're going to do is say, well, everybody knows they need a driver's license, right? So we're going to put in the driver's license, which they can't turn down. I said, okay, if you just had a separate ID card, you would say, well, I don't want that card. I'm not going to take it. Speaker 18: If you Speaker 4: send my driver's license, I better get it because I have to drive. So they're very smart people. They they put you into situations where you have to take things from them. But even if it's in even if it's in the driver's license, you shouldn't take it. Don't take the ID card. And I'm planning a series of nationwide Strikes and revolt against what's happening in the government to wake people up, to shut down the Federal Reserve System, to stop these chips from being employed. You know, and I expect that my movie is going to raise a lot of, awareness and activity from people. People start getting a vibe when they realize what's really happening and how all these central banks of the world are working together. I mean, sometimes you say the word New World Order, and people oh, you're just a conspiracy nut, you know? Speaker 27: Yeah. You know, that's that's not true anymore, though, is Speaker 4: Well, some people. And so I show George Bush in the movie talking about the New World Order. He knows so okay. And so, the point is, the new world order is really where all the governments of the world all the central banks of the world work together, They can they control the governments, and they can control the laws of the world. And we're gonna have to be forced to listen to these laws. And the laws are about controlling us, not giving us freedom, you know? And so unless we get back to our idea of individual rights, individual freedoms, and allowed to express yourself in the way you want, you know, we're going to lose this game. And most people get active and say, Speaker 27: Yeah. I'm Speaker 4: gonna shut down the Federal Reserve System. I'm gonna shut down the powers that be, we're doomed otherwise. Speaker 27: Is there any means beyond that? Say, For example, we're not successful in shutting down the federal reserve, what about strength in numbers with the individuals? What if, half the country is refusing to pay their income tax, for example. Speaker 18: Well, they Speaker 4: already the half country already does not pay it. But, Speaker 27: Seriously, a 67,000,000 Speaker 4: people are Speaker 27: not have I been doing? Speaker 4: I'm told 67,000,000 people by the IRS themselves aren't filing. But I don't think it's all because they were protesting. I think there's a lot of that just Speaker 27: By default, they couldn't pay the taxes. Speaker 4: By default, or They're trying to skip it or whatever, you know. But, I Speaker 12: mean I mean Speaker 4: I mean, even if we can't get the congress to shut down the phones air system, Then you shut down the country with massive strikes, get everybody to stop. I mean, you just get a peep because people are gonna begin to realize because we're coming near the end game, And things are starting to accelerate, you know? And people looking at George Bush is going to declare martial law, they think. Speaker 27: Yes. There's a lot of fear about that. Speaker 18: It Speaker 4: wouldn't surprise me. Speaker 27: Right? In fact, there's already some there's already some talk. It's not even talk that Homeland Security is going to be involved in federal If if we have a national emergency and auditing what you can and can't remove from your own safety deposit boxes at some of the country's largest banks? Speaker 4: Oh, yes. There's no question that there's stuff going around where if they want to repossess the gold and that people have private You don't Speaker 27: have private, personal Private, personal Right. Speaker 18: You know, Speaker 4: you won't be able to go into a bank vault without somebody from Homeland Security there with you to see what you're taking out. You know, I mean, it's a complete take To Well, executive there are executive orders out there that say the government has the ability to put you on a work detail. In In other words, let's say you're a teacher in Oregon. They could put you digging ditches in Ohio. That's an executive order. They can relocate whole populations if they want to. That's these are real executive orders. I mean, the government is planning a takeover of the American people. I understand, and I haven't I've I know some of this to be true, but I understand there are 800 in terminate camps. Speaker 27: I was just going to ask you this question next, and I didn't know it was up to 800. But not it's my understanding that not only do they exist, I actually went to conference listening to an engineer, very dry presentation on how they build them, how they tunnel that far every day, and the kind of technical end of building these camps underground, which are spotted all over the United States. Speaker 4: Yes. Speaker 27: Now most people don't know these exist. No. No. The heck are they building them for if not for use? Speaker 4: Well, they claim they're billing them for if there's too much immigration to the country, you know, if it gets crazy Speaker 27: Round everybody up. Speaker 4: You know, at this point, it's hard to know what's in their minds. All I know is the fact is that that they're building them. That's for real. Speaker 27: Right. Speaker 4: And how they're gonna use them is speculation on my part. Right. But any good any good logical way of thinking, let you know what they're going to use them for. And so even though I can't prove what's in their minds, it's pretty obvious. And It seems to me that what we have to fight for is to restore the very essence of what Thomas Jefferson and James Madison gave us here, that we control the government. This is about We The People again, not about the government and these bankers working together to stifle us. You know? And unless the people wake up and say, hey, I'm not going to take this anymore, you know? I'm mad as hell. I'm not going to do this, and stop it. Because we have the power. We still have the power. They can't if we resist, there's nothing they can do. Speaker 27: The problem is we're asleep at the wheel. We're being lulled by Well, Speaker 4: But people like you are trying to wake people up. I'm trying to wake people up. There's more people awake now than they've ever been before. I see that happening and I think a picture like mine can help wake people up to what the truth is, and possibly, the word will spread. And if we can all get focused on how to win the game instead of all these different, what, objectives, you know, all these different, Speaker 27: Keeping us polarized. Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, no. No. I don't even mean that. I mean, there are people who are fighting, you know, to get a better environment. There are people who are fighting for the lack of gun control. Speaker 18: There are Speaker 4: all these different issues that are going on around the country, Speaker 18: Mhmm. Speaker 4: Which are all important on their own. Mhmm. But if we can sort of consolidate all that and focus, take all those people and say, listen. We should down the phones there first, then we'll deal with those issues. Speaker 27: Right. Speaker 4: You know? Let's let's go to the agenda, the objective first, then we'll go back to the other stuff. Right. Because that's that's the priority right now. You gotta call off the head of the beast. Speaker 27: Right. Right? Speaker 4: And the head of the beast is the Federal Reserve and the people behind it. You see? And that's what will save this country. And if people understand that and they stop being good Democrats and stop being good Republicans, but rather become good Americans Mhmm. That's what
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 3:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The fear of a centralized digital currency (CBDC) replacing physical money is unfounded. Various forms of currency, including digital, physical, electronic, and paper, will coexist. Unlike the Federal Reserve or IMF, CBDC won't be forced upon anyone. The push to ban cash comes from the Khazarian Mafia, as seen with Klaus Schwab and B. Netanyahu. Gold and silver were outlawed in 1971 to manipulate paper money. CBDC was planned to be enforced during lockdowns, but with their end, the excuse is gone. The Gold Standard will ensure physical money remains, even in token/coin form. Don't be misled by those who profit from chaos and confusion.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

🚨This is for all the people trying to push the CBDC fear porn just to get clicks & views. • Digital (ISO-20022) • Physical (Basel 3) • Electronic (Visa/Master Card) • Paper (US Treasury Notes) Will all coexist under one system parallel to one another. No one will be forced to only use CBDC against their will like the Federal Reserve or IMF would have done if Hillary Clinton was in office. Remember when Klaus Schwab called for Western nations to ban all cash? Guess who he works for? The Khazarians. Why do you think you seen pictures of Klaus & Bibi shaking hands? Who is the head of the Khazarian Mafia? B. Netanyahu. Donald Trump has told us multiple times that he does not support Crypto as the only source of currency to replace the American dollar. Why do you think they outlawed Gold & Silver in 1971? So you can only use the paper money they were manipulating by endlessly printing it because they (Fed-Reserve) was not beholden to any Gold/Silver reserves that could have put a limit on how much they can print. Guess what? They want to do the same thing with CBDC by outlawing physical cash. This was supposed to happen while we were still under Quarantine/Lockdowns because they were going to use the contagion to ban the use of physical money to prevent "The Spread" to usher in the CBDC exclusively because it would have been safer sinse no one would have to touch anything. You understand now? Remember Quarantine/Lockdowns were supposed to last until 2030 under the "Vaccine Mandates". Now that this has been lifted they no longer have any warranted excuse to use the virus to remove all physical money to force us to use only digital because they want to save lives by having all transactions take place through a centralized digital system. People would have supported this due to how deadly the virus was. Mind you only seniors and babies were vulnerable. People this is not hard to understand. It's a tired worn, torn, and used playbook. Remember what comes online on the 19th. This is how you will know for certain that the manipulation of our currency will be over.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The Gold Standard- This is what we are returning to. Which means we will always have physical money even if it's not paper. Because guess what? We now have the technology where you can use Gold physical tokens/coins. Remember we were not always using cash. We started using cash in the late 1600s. The first paper money was issued by the Massachusetts Bay Colony in response to a shortage of coins. The paper money was called "bills of credit" or "IOUs" and was backed by the colony's silver reserves. Do you see how this has been used to scare you for nothing in terms of people pushing this cash ban for CBDC? You were already using coins before paper. Stop allowing people to use you to build their platforms based on info they use to create chaos & confusion just to leave you wondering what your future will be.

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 2:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of State, played a significant role in establishing the petro dollar system in the Middle East. However, Saudi Arabia is now requesting the withdrawal of US military presence as they have a strong currency backed by gold and silver. Kissinger's involvement in various wars and false flags is also highlighted. The article emphasizes the shift towards a gold standard and tax exemptions on precious metals in several US states. It concludes by mentioning ongoing geopolitical events and the anticipation of a new financial system.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Henry Kissinger: The Devil's Secretary Of State The death of Henry Kissinger for most people is an uneventful thing that holds no significance to them from the multiple events that transpired in November, H. Kissinger is the most impactful. Why? Because he was the one who offered the Middle East the petro dollar with nothing backing but the military which was the most advanced at the time. So ofcourse this was the bargaining tool used to convince the Middle East to adopt a worthless fiat currency to then denominate all oil trade deals in USD. Guess who ended this trade policy? Saudi Arabia. Guess who is now requesting that all the US Military leave since they now have a strong currency back by Gold & Silver that is no longer depending on the Petro dollar after January 1s 2024? The Middle East. You have to understand how just in recent years every nation was paying for oil in USD. Ask yourself why would someone who knew America could produce our own oil go to the Middle East to peddle their's? Because the goal was not to enrich American people like Dubai has enriched their citizens by creating an economic model where Dubai's rulers, particularly Sheikh Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum, implemented a series of bold initiatives to transform their society. They invested heavily in infrastructure, including airports, roads, and ports, creating a foundation for economic growth. They also established free trade zones, attracting foreign investment and promoting entrepreneurship. Not to mention the oil component where the discovery of oil in the 1950s played a significant role in Dubai's initial economic boom. Oil revenue fueled infrastructure development, creating jobs and attracting further investment. Which is why Joe Biden shutdown down the Keystone XL Pipeline. Which I am sure Henry Kissinger had a lot to do with given that he's a proponent of America last policies where we are dependent upon other nations for everything. But this is beside the point. Saudi Arabia & Russia are going to be backing their currency with precious metals. Any country looking to do business with them will have to do the same especially of they want to join the BRICS Nations. Iraq will be a major component to bring the Middle East from under the foot of central bankers who pump the fiat USD. The dollar auctions in Iraq is on December 6th. H. Kissinger has committed so many acts of crimes to ensure the fiat USD reigns supreme for nation ls who are looking to go back to the Gold Standard like Muammar Gaddafi. H. Kissinger was behind many wars and many false flags in other countries. • The Bangladesh Killings that involved 3 million deaths. • The Laos Bombing which caused 200,000 deaths. • The Vietnam War which was 2.5 million deaths. • The Cambodia Bombing which caused 500,000 deaths. • The overthrowing of Chile government that he caused. • The Argentina Dirty War where 30,000 were killed and 30,000 disappeared. (33 anyone?) • The East Timor Invasion which resulted in 200,000 deaths. Remember this is the same guy who was the mentor to Klaus Schawb the head of the WEF. No wonder they both share the same NWO objectives. Because I remember this very interesting quote from Mr. Kissinger. "If you control the oil, you control entire nations. If you control the food, you control the people. If you control the money, you control the entire world". End quote. Do we understand how diabolical these people truly are? The nation's first Treasury Secretary, Alexander Hamilton. In 1791 ... proposed the establishment of a Bank of the United States, modeled on the privately-owned Bank of England. The Bank of the United States was used to deposit US Government revenues from its tax collections and to issue bank notes to increase the money supply as the Bank saw fit. The Bank had a capital stock of $10 million, with 80% of the bank being owned by private investors. The US Government in effect handed over to private bankers control over its money and agreed to pay those bankers interest to boot on money it borrowed. All of this goes back to the 1871 Act. “By passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers read: ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ [note that neither the words ‘united’ nor ‘states’ began with capital letters] But the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our rights of sovereignty [sui juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.” End quote. By David Williams. So As an instrument of the international bankers, the UNITED STATES owns you from birth to death. It also holds ownership of all your assets, of your property, even of your children. Think long and hard about all the bills taxes, fines, and licenses you have paid for or purchased. Which is why once we switch over to the Gold Standard we will not be taxed. States are already doing this. Louisiana: In 2013, the laws relaxed even further, with all precious metals, including gold, silver, platinum and palladium in their many forms, becoming tax free regardless of quantity. Arkansas: The purchase, sale, or exchange of any type or form of specie shall not give rise to any tax liability. The law builds on a foundation set in 2021 when Arkansas repealed the sales tax on gold and silver. Taxes on gold and silver raise investment. Mississippi: MERIDIAN, Miss. (WTOK) - Gov. Tate Reeves signed SB 2862 into law last week. It make gold and silver coins and bullion exempt from state sales tax. Mississippi is the 43rd state to enact a law of this nature. You can add 20 more states to this list as it will keep growing. Why are they doing this? Gold and silver have themselves been money for thousands of years and are the most durable forms of money. They also do not suffer from counterparty risk, ensuring their value is relatively immune to the risks of the global financial markets. Guys, everything you want I'd happening under your nose. Stop looking for everything to debut like some Hollywood blockbuster world premiere that will be saturated over the airwaves for everyone who doesn't like researching to notice. Because that's exactly what the "Nothing Is Happening Folks" are doing. We are slowly being pulled away from the Khazarian Rothschilds banking system. We will officially be under the new system once Iraq reinstate their currency on the Forex Market. All the advance technology you are waiting for. All the humanitarian projects you are waiting for. All the disclosure you are waiting for. Is going to be on the other side of the fiat system. Right now you are only being introduced to it. Which is why you see the Push & Pull I mentioned on the last post. This is why the HSBC is gearing up for the Basel 3 end game. This is why the Ukraine & Israel War is wrapping up. This is why Media Matters is in the spotlight. This is why over 200 advertisers are leaving X. This is why Seth Rich Laptop is in the news. This is why the J6 case is reaching fever pitch. This is why Iraq is ditching the USD on Jan 1st 2024. You are being preped & primed. This is why Senator Tommy Tuberville said he expects a 9/11 false flag every other week. Because we are watching the death throes of the Cabal. The media will never tell you Stephen Colbert was arrested when he called in a weeks of shows for medical rreasons. Remember that new prison that I mentioned that was built in Guam? Remember you had people vouching for that in the comment section? Remember I told you those 200 new cells were exclusively for the MSM? Guess where Stephen Colbert is right now? 😁

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 7:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Revolutionary War was driven by the fear of losing control over the banking system. The Rothschilds manipulated precious metal prices to sell currency to the colonies at a lower price, establishing themselves as banking powerhouses. The King of England enforced acts to control the money supply, leading to the war. The discovery of precious metals in the colonies threatened the bankers' power. The war didn't grant true independence, as debt to England remained. In 1871, pressured by bankers, the church, and England, the US transitioned from a republic to a corporation. The DC Flag's stars represent London, Vatican, and DC, all controlled by wealthy families.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

From Tironianae https://t.me/Tironianae The 1871 Act- One of Tiro's old posts I thought apropos today. The heart of it all. They've lost control. 🔥Revolutionary War, Act of 1871, and Trump This should answer some questions you may have. I've made this post before but added a lot more. The Rothschilds began to control the fluctuation of the precious metals in the market, and what they saw was the colonies created a stable money supply. The Rothschilds knew that if they drove the value down of precious metals, they could sell the currency to the colonies for a much lower price. Therefore, making themselves the next powerhouse in the banking system. So, what really led to the Revolutionary War wasn't necessarily about tax without representation, it was about the colonies that created a stable money supply, and they were afraid they would lose power of the banking system. The Rothschilds went to the King of England and put the responsibility on him of controlling the 13 colonies. The King of England created these acts like the Townshend Act, and Stamp Act to get the colonies to acquiesce back to the bankers. This was purely to control the money supply. It's always based on money. So, you have to look at the discovery of natural resources during the colonial period. They didn't discover oil, but they discovered precious metals here in what we now call the United States. The bankers knew that if they used the first reiteration of the money supply based off the land value which was stable, they could use it long term when they began to mine precious metals for their formulated currency. Since the King of England controlled the colonies, the colonies didn't have a strategic metals contract. This is why the original currency wasn't based off of precious metals, it was based off land value. All the other countries had a contract with the bankers which allowed them to create coinage. It wasn't until 1776 that we were allowed to actually create our own coinage. The bankers knew that with all the precious metals we had in the "United States", that they were going to be in trouble. This single-handedly led to the Revolutionary War. MONEY. Why do you think that precious metals are so manipulated? Silver is the most manipulated metal in the world. JP Morgan has already gotten in trouble for this. The globalists love the current system because it keeps you enslaved. Understand that this system needs to come down. It's a war continued on, but it always leads back to money. Follow the money. We're we ever truly free after the Revolutionary war? Simply, no. We weren't able to get the debt we owed to England destroyed after the war. Look at the Jay Treaty; November 19, 1794. Article 6. We still had all this debt to pay, and we were no different after the war then before the war. We were still under control of England without occupation. However, in that treaty, there were several things that were subordinate to our constitution. Things that still made us acquiesce to the King even before the war. It still kept going. We were given a governmental independence and able to make our own coinage. That was our independence even though we still had obligation to stay in debt to the King under their control. The founding Fathers couldn't go to the people and say agreements were made, but by the way we're still in major debt to the King. They told the people that we won the war, but we never truly got our full independence from the Crown. In 1870, Europe made a debt call on us. The debt back from 1776. We had no way to repay, and Europe wanted control. This all eventually culminated into the Act of 1871. It was a document that was pressured on us from the bankers, the church, and England. It moved us from a republic to a corporation. Again, the three stars on the DC Flag represent London, Vatican and DC. All under control of families that have the wealth.

Tironianae 🍊 🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet In God We Trust - The Great Awakening VIncit Omnia Veritas Semper Fidelis  t.me
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 1:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Moore v. United States: A Federal Showdown with Tax Implications The pending case of Moore v. United States before the Supreme Court challenges a tax provision, potentially creating legal uncertainty and risking significant revenue loss. Donald Trump is behind this filing. Foreign currency holders' capital gains may be affected. The liberal media's silence on this case raises questions. Former IRS agent Joe Banister challenged the tax code but was denied information on legitimacy. Charges against him were dismissed. The IRS owners residing tax-free in Puerto Rico adds to the controversy. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 triggered the Moore case. The Atlantic criticized the Supreme Court's involvement. The media's interest lies in a struggling working class. Financial freedom and a new monetary system are already underway, with evidence supporting Trump's plans for a transformed America.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Moore vs The United States of America: The Federal Showdown A major case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court (Moore v. United States) is calling into question one of those provisions. Depending on how the court rules, large portions of the U.S. tax base could quickly become legally uncertain, putting significant revenue at stake. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/moore-v-united-states-tax-unrealized-income/ Do you know this is going on right now? Do you know who is behind this filing? Donald Trump. Do you know what this means for foreign currencies holders concerning capital gains? Do you know why the liberal media is ignoring this case? Do you know a former IRS agent named Joe Banister challenged the IRS Tax code and requested info on the legitimacy and was denied? Did you know they tried to take Joe to Federal Court and the case was dismissed because the charges were bogus? This is what Joe said below regarding why he challenged the IRS. "Federal Law Does Not Make The Average American Liable For The Federal Income Tax - Federal tax laws follow a distinctive pattern: a tax is imposed and a person is designated as the responsible party to pay the tax that is imposed. Being designated in the law as the person responsible for paying a particular tax imposed is called being made liable for the tax. This dual tax imposition and tax liability pattern is followed over and over again in federal tax law, yet ordinary Americans living and working in the United States of America have never been made liable for the federal income tax. What is the reason, then, that in the more than 100 years since the 16th Amendment was conceived, Congress has had plenty of time and opportunity to pass a law and send it to the President's desk making the average American living and working in the United States liable to pay the federal income tax and yet no such law is found in the Internal Revenue Code? If being liable for the federal income tax is not is not a critical legal component of owing the federal income tax, why has the IRS made sure to state in the Form 1040 Instruction booklet and elsewhere since the 1970s that Americans must file a return or statement with the IRS for “any tax you are liable for”? Learn more about this topic here." End quote. https://agentfortruth.com Do you all know where this is going right? Do you know the IRS owners live in Puerto Rico where they do not have to pay taxes that they collect on you to live is lifestyle of luxury that you are taxed for in America? The story of Moore started in 2017, when President Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The law aimed to minimize the incentive for U.S. corporations to hoard money overseas by reducing certain taxes on foreign earnings. But, in exchange, U.S. investors would have to pay a onetime tax on accumulated foreign profits going back several decades—the so-called transition tax. Charles and Kathleen Moore are among the Americans affected by the change. Did you know The Atlantic did an article saying the Supreme Court shouldn't even entertain the case? They went as far as saying why the Supreme Court was even allowing themselves to be subject to an agency that shouldn't be questioned on their authority on taxing the American people. Do you see why liberal media wants the America people to struggle and remain in poverty? Their entire style of journalism is contingent upon a struggling working class and they are threatened by the fact that you will stop listening to them because you are doing better financially and wouldn't be interesting in their reports anymore. Well they are right and that day is coming sooner than they would want.

How the Moore Supreme Court Case Could Reshape Taxation of Unrealized Income Details and analysis of how the Moore v. United States Supreme Court case could reshape unrealized income tax treatment and repatriation. taxfoundation.org
Agent For Truth agent for truth,freedomabovefortune agentfortruth.com

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

How is everyone doing tonight? Bern preoccupied with some things. I have alot do contender with so I was a bit slow on the draw today. But we are rounding off 2023 very nicely as where we are at is going to reshape the entire landscape of how we are governed. We are heading towards a tumultuous but mostly brief upheaval once the dollar runs into that brick wall. Remember, a crash got us into this mess and it will be a crash that gets us out. 😉

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

People this is your financial freedom happening now. Not in the future. We are already on a new monetary system. You are only seeing the after affects in terms of banks shutting down and the IRS being defunded. No one can you tell you differently. Why? Because the evidence is right here below. Do not let anyone tell you about how D. Trump has turned on America and abandoned us. He has things already in motion where if he returned or died tomorrow wouldn't make any difference as to the path already carved out for a New America. https://www.oxfordgoldgroup.com/news/23-u-s-states-move-to-recognize-gold-and-silver-as-legal-tenders/ https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/gold-and-silver-legal-tender-states https://www.investorsobserver.com/news/qm-news/5538391749687833 https://news.bitcoin.com/arkansas-makes-gold-silver-legal-tender-23-states-involved-in-similar-legislation-to-establish-us-dollar-alternatives/

23 U.S. States Move to Recognize Gold and Silver as Legal Tenders | Oxford Gold Group With the “Arkansas Legal Tender Act,” 23 U.S. states have now moved to recognize gold and silver as legal tender. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Arkansas’ governor, oxfordgoldgroup.com
Gold and Silver Legal Tender States 2023 worldpopulationreview.com
23 US states move to reclaim gold and silver as legal tender 2023-04-07 08:21:54 ET As the international reserve currency for the better part of a century, global trust in the US dollar has been virtually limitless. At any time, in nearly any country, its role as the ultimate safe-haven currenc... investorsobserver.com
Arkansas Makes Gold, Silver Legal Tender; 23 States Involved in Similar Legislation to Establish US Dollar Alternatives – Economics Bitcoin News A bill signed on April 11 recognized gold and silver as legal tender in Arkansas, allowing the use of gold and silver coins to pay debts. news.bitcoin.com
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 9:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Mike Johnson Debacle: NDAA & FISA. Watching a push and pull, a give and take. Mike Johnson is a bridge, not the solution. The fiat USD, Iraqi IQD, Bibi Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Gaza, and the Federal Reserve are all undergoing changes. Mainstream news won't inform you. Watching Washington DC is like watching a sports game. Focus on local government. The Cabal is losing. The Deep State has no power. The gold standard is being considered. Washington DC no longer has centralized power. Financial institutions are dead. Clarence Thomas's decision will be a marker. The US Military is waiting for the last desperate play from the Cabal. Arresting Trump would have activated EBS/EAS. The military has power over every branch of government. Washington is just performance art.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

📢 The Mike Johnson Debacle: NDAA & FISA I told you all you are watching a Push & Pull. A Give & Take A Pull & Release A Throw & Catch You are not going to get everything in one motion on either side of this game until we are publicly and officially under "The New System". Speaker Mike Johnson is a bridge to this not the solution. What is the one thing happening right now with the fiat USD? What is the one thing happening with the Iraqi IQD? What is the one thing happening with Bibi Netanyahu? What is the one thing happening with Vladimir Putin? What is the one thing happening in Gaza? What is the one thing happening with the Federal Reserve? What did I tell you all about the current government in Washington? That they are there specifically to prop up the fiat petro dollar correct? Now let me ask you this one question. Who on Capital Hill informed any of their constituents that the USD was depegged from OPEC? Who in Washington D.C informed their constitution that 12 of the largest banks informed Credit & Debit Card companies their services will no longer be needed as of midnight today? Who in our government informed their constituents that Vladimir Putin declared victory today in Ukraine? Wait, don't tell me you are waiting for mainstream news to tell you this? Don't tell me you are waiting for some politicians to tell you this? Sorry, that's nots going to happen. You know how Volodymyr Zelenskyy will announce his defeat? Through a "Peace Deal". Do you think all the info shared here would have came from government or mainstream media on conservative & liberal outlets? No. Why is everyone waiting for the Cabal to inform the American people they are losing the war for this country and your souls? You have to understand watching Washington DC at this point is no different then watching a sports game. These accounts that constantly keep you updated about the dying dinosaurs in DC are no different than sports commentators on ESPN. They bore me. They have nothing else to offer you. They do this because they know you are still under the spell just as you were before you detached yourself from liberal media networks. Do you know how many followers I would lose if I consistently bombarded you with what the government is doing? What in the world can the Cabal do with any surveillance bill by the FBI & DOJ that temporarily got an extension until April when they are all facing extinction by firing squad or noose around the neck that will be permanent? When you look at SOTH do not overlap one agenda for another an assume one of them cancels out the other simply because one got prioritized over another temporarily when nothing being done in Washington will give any long term power to the Deep State when they already lost the West V vs EPA Case that puts an end to all 3 letter agencies sense they no longer have power to overide congress to decide what bills get passed. I showed you all your focus should be on your local government from here on out. Remember, Washington DC no longer has centralized power over the states. This is why you are seeing a move towards "The Gold Standard" without any one person in DC having any say so as to which states get to use Gold & Silver ad legal tender and being exempt from taxes. Remember, when we were taken off the Gold Standard and it was decided by one person? We do not live in this era anymore. Mind you it was The government that confiscated gold held by private citizens. Who signed that EO 6102? Morgenthau, along with other Treasury officials like Assistant Secretary Arthur Ballantine and lawyer Randolph Paul, consulted with legal experts and advisors to draft the order. They aimed to address the issue of gold hoarding, which was seen as detrimental to economic recovery, by requiring all Americans to surrender gold coin, bullion, and certificates exceeding a specific amount to the Federal Reserve correct? Guess who no longer has money? The Federal Reserve. Guess who no longer has a monopoly on yhe banking system? The Rothschilds. Guess who no longer accepts Fiat USD in oil contracts? The Middle East. Guess who no longer has support for the war in Gaza? Bibi Netanyahu. Guess who no longer will deal with fiat USD on January 1st 2024? Iraq. I ask you again if you are getting all thus information on X' without Capitol Hill or mainstream media why are you bothered about what they are doing everyday? Have you forgotten where your slavery to the system started? Do you need Speaker Mike Johnson to announce to you that these financial institutions are dead in the water? What you are looking for in Washington will not start there. Remember whatever Clarence Thomas decides to do for the 2020 election case will be a marker for "The Normies". It will only be validation for us, publicly. The only reason this is dragging out is because the US Military is trying to elicit the last desperate play from the Cabal. They can use a myriad of things to do that since we are still under National Emergency through EO 13912 that made Donald Trump a Wartime president. Why do you all think the Cabal never put physical handcuffs on D. Trump? They knew it would have officially ended them. Because if we are occupied by a foreign power (Washington DC) and they put cuffs on a CIC under a National Emergency this would have gave grounds for the military to step in publicly and activate EBS/EAS. • Diplomatic pressure and negotiations. • Economic sanctions or other punitive measures. • Legal action through international courts or organizations. • Military action as a last resort, if deemed necessary and justified under international law. This is a general outline if D. Trump was arrested. Now imagine the current circumstances while under COG/JAG? I suggest you all stop worrying about what DC is doing. Nobody on Capitol Hill has the power to stop anything. Why? Because our Military is over every single branch of government. So if they haven't stepped in at this time obviously it's not important enough to prematurely intervene into something that's already set in stone in terms of everyone who has already committed treason. What's going on in Washington is nothing but performance art at thus point.

Saved - December 15, 2023 at 12:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent removal of the petro dollar from OPEC oil raises questions about the timing of a particular message. The "Treasury Dollar Act" of 2020 proposes the issuance of a new class of perpetual Treasury Bills called 'Treasury Dollars' that would be legal tender. Additionally, digital wallet capability would be added to Treasury Direct Accounts for peer-to-peer transactions. These important developments are often overshadowed by dramatic headlines, but they have significant implications for the future of our monetary system. It is worth noting that physical gold and silver will continue to play a role alongside digital and paper forms of money.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

🚨 Coincidence? Timing? Synchronicity? Why does this particular message come right on the heels of the petro dollar officially being removed from OPEC oil? How many of you heard of the "Treasury Dollar Act" of 2020? 1. First, Treasury is instructed to issue a new class of zero coupon perpetual Treasury Bill - the 'Treasury Dollar Bill,' or 'Treasury Dollar' - valued at precisely one Federal Reserve Note (a.k.a. 'dollar bill') per Treasury Dollar. The Treasury Dollar is deemed legal tender, sufficient to discharge all obligations public and private, on a par with Federal Reserve Notes. It is in effect identical to the Federal Reserve Note (again, the current 'dollar bill') in respect of all attributes save its issuer. 2. Second, Treasury is instructed to add phone-accessible digital wallet capability to all Treasury Direct Accounts, such as to enable direct peer-to-peer transacting in 'real time' both among all wallet holders inter se and between wallet holders and the public fisc. The U.S. Digital Service, an executive agency housed within the Executive Office of the President of the United States, is instructed to design and implement the digital wallet capability in collaboration with Treasury.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3563007 Do you all see how things that actually matter for "The New Republic" is not headlines news like every other drama filled headlines regarding what's going on in Washington D.C? All you have now are accounts on X' reminding why you shouldn't redundantly trust the government because of policy disagreement when that came centuries after your government already sold you out. It wasn't a policy it was a loan that enslaved you. Digital Paper Electronic Metals These are the four forms of money that will coexist without one overriding the other. As we will always have physical gold/silver to be the bottom line of the monetary system moving forward. Which is why over 25 states already have bills passed to make it legal tender. So please ignore people trying to push this digital dystopian society. When they try to ask them to show you the local bill in their state where Digital metals will replace physical metals. I put my house on it they can not provide it. But I bet you will here them crying about it online with no real paperwork to substantiated it.

The Treasury Dollar Act of 2020 This Bill would convert the Department of Treasury's existing 'Treasury Direct' system of universally available transaction accounts in Treasury Securities into papers.ssrn.com
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 3:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the fall of fiat hegemony and suggest that the end of the Federal Reserve is imminent. They mention significant events involving Vladimir Putin and Iraq, as well as the increasing number of states passing bills to make gold and silver legal tender. The posts imply that 2023 will be the last year of the Fed-Reserve system. A referenced post provides a decode related to the debt clock.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

📢 The Fall Of Fiat Hegemony: Think about this real good. What do you have on your tombstone? Your birth & death date. They are "officially implying" that the end of the Federal Reserve is this year. Why would this be the case? What did V. Putin do on December 6th in Saudi Arabia? What is Iraq doing on January 1st 2024? How many states are passing bills to make gold & silver legal tender? So if you know all the answers to those questions this message should not be surprising to you. You will know for certain 2023 will be the last year the Fed-Reserve system will be null/void. The process leading up to this message is a marker for those who have been researching & studying and paying attention to all the info leading up to this revelation.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The decode- https://x.com/XRPLion1/status/1738147807977185375?s=20

@XRPLion1 - XRPLion1 -ΑΩ- "Messenger of GOD'S REVELATION"

©DaveXRPLion™: (NEW) DEBT CLOCK 12/22/23- DECODE. 🚨🦁❤️🔥📯✅🎯🔫🚨

Saved - January 15, 2024 at 1:38 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Federal Reserve Notes are not taxable! How do you tax a debt? https://t.co/ZewmK1AyM0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Federal Reserve notes are not taxable income because they are a debt. The 10.40 bonds were used to support the war effort, and although people invested in them, they were not guaranteed to get their money back. The IRS originated from the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms agency in Puerto Rico and is not part of the US government. By law, we are only supposed to pay taxes to support essential governmental services, but the current system forces us to pay for more than what we actually receive. This is like being forced to pay for 18,000 hamburgers when there are only 19 listed on the menu.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Federal Reserve notes. Again, those dollars you have in your wallet are not taxable income. Listen closely. They're not. How do you tax a debt? You don't make any income. Do you guys even know where the 10.40 came from? 40 bonds. Lincoln, the 10 40 bonds. You guys watch my videos. The 10 40 bonds. Police support the war effort. I want you to consider it as a gift because the the government is broke, and you may never get paid on those bonds, but please invest. We need the money to fund the war our effort, and Americans stepped up the plate and funded the 10.40 bonds far more than they ever thought no American got his investment back, and Lincoln told them they probably wouldn't. Honest aid. At least he offered a little bit of fair and honest closure, but the 10 forties never quit. And you sign it, you fill it out, and you sign it under the pains and penalties of perjury by voluntary compliance. You hear that? You're gonna volunteer for that shit. Stop consenting. President Trump said anything. That's something I've always done, that I've been good at. Where'd the IRS come from? The Internal Revenue Service. Where'd they come from? Listen up. They came out of the alcohol, tobacco, firearms, which is now ATFE because they added explosives. That's where IRS came from. Where did that come from? It was a registered sure corporation out of Puerto Rico. The IRS has never been part of the United States government ever. Yep. Is there a third party debt collector? And not $1 that goes to the IRS and the 10 40 funds US government. That's right. You wanna shut them down, cut off the funding. The only taxes we're supposed to pay by law, and I'm happy to pay them because we're supposed to pay them to support those 19 essential governmental services we contracted for. Okay. Let's just use a dumb example because that's all I can come up with. If you walk into a hamburger store, and there's 19 hamburgers listed there, but there's about 18,000 the handed you a whole bunch of the others, and then they pulled out their gun, and they forced you at gunpoint to pay for everything. How would you feel? That's what they do. Yep.
Saved - January 19, 2024 at 9:09 PM

@vegastarr - vegastar

Did you know that America was founded as a tax-free nation? People enjoyed this tax-free status for years until 1913, when the Federal Reserve (FED) was created. 🔺👁️🦉🦎 https://t.co/RE8yAVFNDZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that using debt to acquire property reduces tax payments. They claim that taxes are a Marxist concept and that a progressive income tax supports communism. They mention the Boston Tea Party as an example of America being tax-free until the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The speaker believes that the harder one works and the more money they make, the higher their taxes, which they equate to communism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See, the more debt I use, the more property I own, the less tax I pay. And if you think paying taxes is legal, tax is a Marxist idea. What Marx says is that a progressive and oppressive income tax is essential for the spread of communism. That was in 1848. So it pisses me off about academic types. The facts are America was Fonda, as a tax free nation, it was called the Boston Tea Party. I think it was 17/73, and and we were tax free for all of these years until 1913 when the Fed was created and then 16th. And ever since then, we're paying taxes. But the harder you work, the more money you make, the higher taxes you pay. If that's not communism, what is?
Saved - February 17, 2024 at 3:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Fall of Baal confirms that once the Iraqi Dinar is on the Forex, anyone can convert it into Gold & Silver, making money tax-free. Basel 3 empowers citizens and changes the real estate industry, causing bankers to fear it. The Dodd Frank Act allows banks to legally confiscate money, making them immune to lawsuits. The days of mortgages based on empty promises are over.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

I Guess This Is The End: The Fall of Baal Info came out via Militia-Man & Crew that confirm what I shared with you all about Texas when redeeming currency for precious metals that once the Iraqi Dinar is on the Forex anyone will be able to convert into Gold & Silver. Do you all know how monumental this is? Remember the 43 states that pass bills to make metals legal tender? This means your money will be 100% tax-free. This means that if you purchase property with gold mortgage, taxes, liens, etc, it will not be a factor in any capacity. Why do you think bankers fear Basel 3. Remember what the MBA stated a few days ago? That the entire model of real estate will change because of B-3. "The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) has voiced strong opposition to the Basel capital rule changes, pointing out seven key areas that could affect major banks and regional banks, lenders, servicers, and borrowers within the housing finance ecosystem. Here's a closer look at these crucial concerns". End quote. Basel 3 empowers the citizens. Not the banking industry. This is why they are now trying to double down on the Dodd Frank Act. Which allows the bank to legally confiscate your money making them impervious to lawsuits. You all have to understand. In the 1970s boomers bought houses for 10k-20k. Now do you all see why bankers were crying to Congress about Basel 3 on Capitol Hill a couple of months ago? The days of writing up mortgages with intrest rates that only exist on a computer screen with nothing in the bank vaults to support the contract written out home buyers that agree to honor that over decades on a monthly basis. Not knowing they financially entrapped themselves by signing off on a document that allows the bank to seize or confiscate your property due to delinquency in payments for money they never physically possessed themselves to underwrite a contract based on nothing but a promise and not assets are over. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bnnbloomberg.ca/proposed-bank-capital-rules-threaten-us-real-estate-financing-mba-chief-says-1.2033890.amp.html

BNN Bloomberg bnnbloomberg.ca
Saved - February 25, 2024 at 5:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
NESARA is an acronym that stands for National Economic Security and Reformation Act. Countries around the world are making reforms to their banking and economic systems to join the BRICS Nations. The Gold Standard will remove the Federal Reserve and abolish income tax. Converting IQD into gold can protect against Uncle Sam's reach.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

NESARA is not a name it's an acronym that none of you are looking into. N- National E- Economic S - Security A- And R- Reformation A- Act Now ask yourself what countries around the world are doing in order to join the BRICS Nations? They are doing what to meet the requirements neccessary? Changing their NATIONAL ECONOMY by doing REFORMS in the banking & economic system through ACTS they are passing through congress for SECURITY & STABILITY of their country. You get it now?

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The Gold Standard is going to remove the Federal Reserve. Which is one of the main points of N.E.S.A.R.A.. You are watching the process in real time. This was something that was never going to be announced on any mainstream platform alternative or not. When you break down the acronym then you will understand you have been under NESARA for years. It officially started when the Fed-Reserve was absorbed by the US Treasury in March of 2020. Abolishing income tax is also apart of that correct? Can you tax precious metals? No. So what will the IRS do once we are on the Gold Standard? Cease to exist. This is why you all should consider converting some of your IQD into Gold and purchase your home using it. Why? Because Uncle Sam can not touch you when you do. https://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2023/05/texas-committee-passes-bill-to-create-100-reserve-gold-and-silver-backed-transactional-currencies/

Texas Committee Passes Bill to Create 100% Reserve Gold and Silver-Backed Transactional Currencies | Tenth Amendment Center In establishing gold and silver specie, the comptroller would be required to authorize the Texas Bullion Depository as issuer and ensure that the holder of the specie may use the specie as legal tender in payment of debt and readily transfer the specie to another person. blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
Saved - March 22, 2024 at 2:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Wisconsin Senate has voted in favor of Assembly Bill 29 to eliminate sales tax on gold and silver purchases. The bill, which already passed in the State Assembly, will now be sent to Gov. Tony Evers for his signature. This legislation, sponsored by Rep. Shae Sortwell, has bipartisan support and aligns Wisconsin with 43 other states.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Article: March 18th 2024 Wisconsin Senate has voted in favor of Assembly Bill 29 to end the sales tax on purchases of gold and silver. Joining the state Assembly, which overwhelmingly voted to approve this law last week, Senators voted 23-9 in favor of this pro-sound money legislation. The bill will now be transmitted to Gov. Tony Evers for his signature. Assembly Bill 29, primarily sponsored by Rep. Shae Sortwell, also passed out of the State Assembly by a bipartisan vote of 86-12. This popular bill is cosponsored by almost two dozen other legislators and enjoys wide support – and would align Wisconsin with the policies of 43 other U.S. states. End qoute. ______ Prolotario- Remember I showed you all how many states we have left that didn't sign on to making gold/silver legal tender that is free from being taxed? Remember I told you that if you convert your money into precious metals and purchase a home you will no longer have to pay property taxes? Why do you think you have some people who will exchange their IQD into precious metals? The plug is about to be pulled on the fiat USD. https://goldseek.com/article/wisconsin-senate-votes-end-taxes-sound-money

Wisconsin Senate Votes to End Taxes on Sound Money Imposing taxes on the exchange of Federal Reserve notes for monetary metals (i.e. gold and silver) has become an unusual and outmoded practice in the United States... only 7 states still engage in it. goldseek.com
Saved - April 3, 2024 at 7:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Last year, there were train accidents and meat plant fires. Now, bridges are collapsing. It raises questions about who would be responsible for such attacks, like Russia, China, or the Cabal. The situation with Taiwan is concerning, as China may take military action, potentially leading to a US response. The Deep State may be causing economic damage out of desperation. The Democrat Party relies heavily on illegal aliens for support. Media networks, often run by Zionist Jews, play a role in maintaining the status quo. Bloodline wars and the desire to control America are factors. Reestablishing "Common Law" and aligning with a Republic are being considered. Some states, like Louisiana and Virginia, are making significant changes. It's important to be prepared for a new way of doing things, as Joe Biden is unlikely to have another term.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Good morning to you all. Last year it was trains going off rails crashing and meat plants catching fire. This year, the bridges are collapsing. People in war bridges were the 1st thing to be attacked. Why? It stopped the flow of supplies. So, who would we be fighting in this instance if that were the case? Russia? China? Cabal? Because we have points of intrest to choose from of course for many reasons. You can say the Crimea bridge. You can say the CCP due to economic competition or trade disputes. The U.S. has a long-standing commitment to Taiwan's defense, while China considers Taiwan a breakaway province. If China were to take military action against Taiwan, it could lead to a U.S. military response. They are already surrounding the territory. Xi, just as Russia is trying to do, will probably annex Taiwan. Maybe the Deep State knows their days are numbered, and they are trying to cause as much economic damage as possible to out of sheer desperation. Because Alex Garland has a movie coming out called Civil War and on the promotional cover art for the film America is mostly dark green with Texas & California highlighed in bright green. We do not have to think hard at all about what the dying regime may want to maintain power. And they will use the illegal aliens to do it. Which is basically the only voter base dedicated to the Democrat Party. Because they have all but lost most of them in the liberal ran cities who are turning to the red side of the isle given what is happening with their communities. Government programs, food stamps, voting, licenses, and illegals are being prioritized above all. Not to mention, they can join law enforcement and start arresting everyone who wants to vote Joe Biden out. Ok, maybe I am over dramatizing things a bit. Because everyone now knows Sage Steele entire interview of Biden was carefully scripted by network executives. Do you see how dedicated the system is at maintaining the status quo? Do you understand that these networks are ran by Zionist Jews? I listed yesterday the 7 Jews that own most of the media companies in America. Summer Redstone was one, but since his passing, Shari Redstone, his daughter, has taken over. But it's all still in the family. Which is why I kept reminding you all that we are in bloodline wars. And they all wanted to take over this country. Which is why women of color like Candace Owens & Megan Markle were engaged to heirs who would have raised future heirs into positions of power to uproot "The Trump Dynasty" who wants to bring America out of the grips of the Central Banks. And of course, steps have already been taken in that direction when the Federal Reserve was absorbed by the US Treasury. To the dismay of the Rothschilds. Who have worked decades to remove precious metals out of the homes and mines of America where you would now need a license or permit to dig for gold on land owned by the government. Which is managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) or the U.S. Forest Service. We didn't need to do this in the 1800. It was a 1st come 1st serve basis. But in the 1970s The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 established more comprehensive environmental regulations for mining activities, including requirements for permits and reclamation plans. So I guess the only way we will get out of this is to reestablish "Common Law". We are not officially under the "New Republic" just yet. But states are definitely reforming their laws to be in alignment with a Republic when it comes to gun rights and precious metals being a non taxable currency with legal tender. I mean look at Louisiana. The Senate has passed a bill 37-0 to not allow any rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate of any kind from the WHO, UN, or WEF to be enforced or implemented by the state of Louisiana or any agency. Now do you all see why everyone thinking about moving down here? Virginia is doing the same to some extent with their banks who have been banned from doing business with Blackrock. Again historical changes are being made right under our noses and we need to be ready for a new way to do things. Everyone knows Joe Biden is not going to be getting another term. D. Trump already hinted at getting everything done before he even gets to November elections. Please keep that in mind.

Saved - April 27, 2024 at 9:32 PM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

Is Taxation Theft? 🔊 … "How did we go from fighting a revolution over a 2% tax on a breakfast beverage to what we pay today?"   "We're TAXED on money when we receive it"   "When we spend it"   "When we invest it"   "More money you make, more taxes you pay" 🚨🚨🚨 https://t.co/1CPQ61BRfN

Video Transcript AI Summary
We went from fighting a 2% tax on tea during the revolution to being taxed on money in various ways today. Taxes are imposed on income, spending, saving, investing, and even driving. The government takes more as you earn more. The federal tax code is 26,100 pages, with over 9,000 additional IRS regulations. Despite this, infrastructure funded by taxpayers is deteriorating. Our founding fathers would be displeased with the current tax system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How did we go from fighting a revolution over a 2% tax on a breakfast beverage to what we pay today? We're taxed on money when we receive it, when we spend it, when we keep it, when we invest it, and even when we dive with it. It gets worse. We commute to work to make that money in a car that is taxed again to register on roads we're already taxed to build, fueled by gas that is taxed even further and many times through tolls that tax you again. And that's to maintain bridges and highways and tunnels that already have 1,000,000,000 of dollars, taxpayer dollars allocated to them, and they're still falling apart. Oh, by the way, the more money you make and the more you pay in taxes warrants the government taking more and even higher percentages of your money. Now if you're angry, hold that thought. Our federal tax code is 26 100 pages. But if you read that tax law cover to cover and you did your taxes solely based on that, you probably go to jail. Why? Because that does not include the over 9,000 pages of additional IRS regulations that were never passed into law, but rather written by some bureaucrat sitting in his office that we still have to abide by so much for of buying for the people. We revolted on a tax on tea 250 years ago. Our founding fathers are rolling in their graves right now.
Saved - November 7, 2024 at 7:44 PM

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

In case yall missed it. https://t.co/3oojmWfIF3

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

Just in case you missed it. @RepAndyBiggsAZ @RepAlexMooney @RepGosar @RepLuna leading the charge to save the dollar. #GoldStandard https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/2435?s=3&r=1&q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D

Saved - February 10, 2025 at 3:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Reserve operates under the belief that they own us, and it's crucial that they undergo a full audit. Recently, the Biden Administration passed legislation exempting Federal Reserve Banks from taxation, effective October 1, 2023. This means that their capital stock, surplus, and income are free from federal, state, and local taxes. It's frustrating to realize this, and I feel strongly that we need to reclaim our country from the influence of the Federal Reserve and Central Banks. Let's make sure everyone is aware of this situation.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Federal Reserve believes THEY OWN US. The Fed must be FULLY AUDITED 🚨 In Affect: Biden Admin Passed that The Federal Reserve Banks ARE EXEMPT FROM TAXATION “Bet you didn't know this. 12 USC 531 exemption from taxation under uscodehouse. gov. In effect, October 1st, 2023. Exempt from taxation, federal reserve banks, including the capital stock and surplus therein, and the income derived, therefrom shall be exempt from federal, state, and local taxation. Ain't that a b*tch.” The Federal Reserve and Central Banks BELIEVE THEY OWN US, we must take our country back from them. Make sure EVERYONE sees this 🚨

Video Transcript AI Summary
Did you know about the 12 USC 531 exemption? It's in the US code on house.gov. Effective October 1st, 2023, Federal Reserve Banks, their capital stock, surplus, and income are exempt from federal, state, and local taxes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bet you didn't know this. 12 USC five thirty one exemption from taxation under US code house.gov. Does this say effect in effect 10/01/2023? Exempt from taxation, Federal Reserve Banks, including the capital stock and surplus therein and the income derived therefrom shall be exempt from federal, state, and local taxation. Ain't that a bitch?
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 8:44 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

$425B in gold sits in Fort Knox, yet it doesn’t even get a yearly review. I’ve spent 10 years trying to see it and verify it’s there - Sen. Rand Paul https://t.co/rghXmbl6yk

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been trying to see the gold at Fort Knox for about ten years. I think more transparency is better, and it brings attention to the fact that gold still has value. Gold implicitly gives value to the dollar; that's why central banks have it. This year, the deficit's going to be $2.2 trillion. If you want money for the border, take it from somewhere else in the budget. The Doge Committee, Elon Musk, has found billions of dollars. The way you save money is they send it back to Congress in something called a rescission package, and then we vote on it with a simple majority. I've told the negotiators if they want my vote, they have to talk to me about the numbers. There's a trillion dollars difference between the budget document and what we're going to spend this year. If it's not honest accounting, I don't want to vote for a rubber stamp that leads to increased spending.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Morning to talk about going for the gold. Elon Musk and Doge setting their sights on the country's largest gold reserve, Fort Knox in Kentucky, as its own senator reveals that $425,000,000,000 of a gold supply doesn't even get a yearly review. Kentucky senator Rand Paul joins us now. So, senator, I didn't know it was that much money there, and I was even more surprised that there's been no review. Speaker 1: Well, you know, I've been trying to go down and see the gold, make sure it's all there for about ten years. During the first Trump administration, I got permission. You have to get permission all the way up to the secretary of treasury. And then the secretary of treasury said, well, I wanna go down there too. And then he said, I wanna go down there when there the eclipse is coming through Kentucky too so I can see the eclipse and the gold at the same time, but they came when I wasn't there. So I tried for ten years. I set up the appointment. And then because they want to see the eclipse, they changed the appointment. I didn't get to go down. But the secretary of treasurer and the senior senator from Kentucky did go down and attest that they believe they saw the gold down there. Speaker 0: So what do you think the problem is? Speaker 1: You know, I I think some of them may not think it needs to be out at all the time, but I think the more some like the better, more transparency the better. Yeah. And also it brings attention to the fact that gold still has value and implicitly, not explicitly, but implicitly, gold still gives value to the dollar. Yeah. That's why we don't get rid of it. You know, we've got it. The IMF has it. The World Bank has it. Most of the central banks around the around the world have gold, and it's an implicit trust that the dollar still has some backing. Speaker 0: So, senator, I wanna switch gears through with you. I wanna talk about the since we're talking about money, the GOP budget resolution that is apparently in jeopardy of a concern from the moderates as well as Democrats about the budget. Talk about it. I mean, you are your father's son, and so I I know you've had these objections to it. What are they now? Speaker 1: Well, this year, the deficit's gonna be $2,200,000,000,000. In March, both parties will come back and probably spend $300,000,000,000 more in California for wildfires, and it will be borrowed, not paid for. We just spent another hundred billion dollars in North Carolina. It never seems to end, and we don't borrow it. So what I would say is for border, if you want money for the border, take it from somewhere else in the budget, but let's still have a new spending bill. So this budget is setting up a new spending bill. And, ultimately, this year, there'll be a $2,200,000,000,000, and people will be scratching their head saying, what about all the cuts? What about all the things? The Doge Committee, Elon Musk, has found billions of dollars. The way you save money and it has to be done is they send it back to Congress in something called a rescission package, and then we vote on it with a simple majority. So Republicans alone can cut the spending that DOJ is finding. Senator. They're doing a great job and they're going through it with rapidity, but it's gotta come back to Congress. If I started seeing that, I might be more inclined to go along with them. Speaker 0: I'm almost out of time, but I gotta quickly ask you. Why aren't you in the room? Because as I've said, you haven't changed your position. You're still reasonable, though. Do you understand you're not gonna get everything? I believe your support of a bill will get some of the folks in the house. You'll get Chip Roy. You'll get Thomas Massa's support if you were involved in the negotiation. So I think Thune has been doing a a fairly good job compared to McConnell, but why haven't you been involved with the negotiation? Speaker 1: I've told the negotiators from the very beginning if they want my vote, they have to talk to me about the numbers. They have to be believable numbers, and we have to adhere to them. If the numbers in the budget resolution will be adhered to by the Appropriations Committee, I could be inclined to support the budget. But so far, I've seen no indication. For example, there's a trillion dollars difference between the budget document and what we're gonna spend this year. So it becomes a fiction. And if it's not honest accounting and they're not honestly gonna do it, I don't wanna vote for a rubber stamp that actually leads to increased spending. Speaker 0: I think that's fair. Hopefully, they bring you in because I think some good can be done. Senator, thanks so much for giving us, some time this morning.
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 2:44 PM

@SenRandPaul - Senator Rand Paul

ICYMI, I’m requesting to audit the gold at Fort Knox… cc: @elonmusk https://t.co/TG9AgbDhjc

Saved - April 18, 2025 at 11:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Idaho has made a significant move in the medical freedom arena by allowing Ivermectin to be sold over the counter, joining Arkansas and Tennessee in bypassing prescription requirements. This change empowers individuals to make their own health choices without needing a doctor's consultation. Proponents highlight Ivermectin's proven safety and effectiveness, citing its historical use and recent studies showing better outcomes than some approved treatments. This shift signals a growing resistance to federal overreach in healthcare, with more states likely to follow suit.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨BREAKING: Idaho just made a HUGE move in the medical freedom fight - Governor signs bill allowing Ivermectin to be sold OVER THE COUNTER! Let me break this down for you... 🧵

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

1/ Idaho joins Arkansas and Tennessee in bypassing Big Pharma's gatekeepers. No prescription needed. This is MASSIVE for medical autonomy. The establishment is NOT going to like this...

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

2/ What this means: - Can buy without prescription - No forced doctor consultation - IMMEDIATE effect The medical freedom movement just scored a major win 💪

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

3/ State Sen. Tammy Nichols put it perfectly: "We're removing a barrier." That's exactly what this is about - giving power back to the people to make their own health choices without Big Med's permission slip. How many lives could have been saved five years ago....

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

4/ 🔍 LOOK AT THE DATA: - 2015 Nobel Prize for Ivermectin - 2021 study showed HUGE reduction in COVID deaths - Used successfully worldwide - Called a "wonder drug" by medical experts But the FDA still won't acknowledge it... Wonder why? 🤔 https://www.somo.nl/big-pharma-raked-in-usd-90-billion-in-profits-with-covid-19-vaccines/

Big Pharma raked in USD 90 billion in profits with COVID-19 vaccines - SOMO Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, and Sinovac made an extraordinary USD 90 billion in profits on their COVID-19 vaccines in 2021 and 2022. somo.nl

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

5/ The establishment wants you to believe this is "dangerous." Yet it's been: - Used by BILLIONS of people globally - Available OTC in many countries - Has decades of safety data They just want to force you into the expensive "jab"

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

6/ Here's what they DON'T tell you: A 2022 study showed better outcomes compared to their "approved" treatments. But this info gets buried because it doesn't fit their narrative... 🤫

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

7/ The real story here: States are finally standing up to federal overreach and corruption in healthcare. This is about FREEDOM OF CHOICE. More states will follow. Watch. 🎯

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

If you enjoyed this content, please like and share, and also sign up for your FREE or PREMIUM subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org.

The Rod Martin Report | Rod D. Martin | Substack Tech Entrepreneur. Futurist. Christian. "Philosopher Capitalist". Click to read The Rod Martin Report, by Rod D. Martin, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. rodmartin.org
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 9:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user advocates for returning the dollar to the gold standard and halting money printing. Another user counters that the gold standard has its own issues, citing historical currency manipulation by gold merchants and recent price-fixing incidents in the finance industry.

@ksorbs - Kevin Sorbo

It's time to return the dollar to the gold standard and stop printing money. https://conservativebrief.com/trump-plans-trip-90891/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=805

@starets2642931 - starets

@ksorbs Gold standard brings its own problems. The original currency manipulators were the gold merchants. In recent years their have been repeated instances of precious metals price fixing by the finance industry. 1/

Saved - May 27, 2025 at 11:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw Florida Governor Ron DeSantis passionately criticize Congress for not implementing any DOGE cuts, emphasizing the need for a balanced budget amendment and term limits. He pointed out that despite a Republican majority, nothing has changed. Additionally, he signed a new law allowing Florida to recognize gold and silver as legal tender, aiming to provide financial freedom amid federal spending issues. This legislation will enable money services to treat precious metals as currency, not just investments, and I appreciate the legislature's efforts in this initiative.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 BREAKING: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis just went OFF about no DOGE cuts being voted on by Congress. "DOGE fought the swamp, and so far, the swamp has won." "DON'T tell me it can't be done." "@ElonMusk went into this DOGE effort - he was getting LAMPOONED...firebombing his tesla dealerships, media smearing him relentlessly..." "We have a Republican congress and to this day, we're at the end of May, past Memorial Day, and not one CENT in DOGE cuts have been implemented by the Congress!" "That's one of the reasons why we need a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That's another reason why we need term limits for members of Congress."

Video Transcript AI Summary
A trillion-dollar deficit is a tax that impacts the economy. Elon Musk faced media attacks and business challenges for advocating for reduced federal spending. Despite a Republican Congress, no spending cuts have been implemented. This situation highlights the need for a balanced budget amendment and term limits for members of Congress. Doge and Elon were on a collision course with the swamp, and the swamp has won. Florida has paid off 41% of its debt since the speaker became governor and has the lowest per capita debt of any state. The state's per capita debt is about $400 per person, while the US federal debt is $105,000 per person and rising. Florida also has the lowest number of state employees per capita and is the second lowest in terms of spending per capita among all 50 states.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trillion dollar deficit is a tax on you. It it it works its way through the economy. There's no free lunch, and that's what ends up happening. And I it's a little frustrating. You know, Elon Musk went into this Doge effort. He was getting lampooned. I mean, like, they're firebombing his Tesla dealerships. Media smearing him relentlessly. His businesses suffered all this stuff because he basically said, look, we can't keep doing this, and we need to moderate and reduce the amount of money that the federal government is spending. And yet, we have a Republican Congress. And to this day, we're in the the May, past memorial day, and not one cent in Doge cuts have been implemented by the congress. That's one of the reasons why we need a balanced budget amendment to the US constitution. Constitution. It's another reason why we need term limits for members of congress. But I think what you've seen with how and and I I kind of said this early on that Doge and Elon were on a collision course with the swamp. And the question is what would happen? And I don't think there's any question that Doge fought the swamp, and so far, the swamp has won. And that's just unfortunate, but I don't think you can look at this any other way. So this is hardwired into how the people in Washington are borrowing and spending your money. But it has huge implications, for the viability of our economy, our country, and everything going forward. And, you know, don't tell me it can't be done. When I became governor so if you look at, Florida's been a state for a hundred eighty years. If you look at all the debt that's been accumulated over our entire, history of statehood, just since I've been governor, we've paid off 41% of it, and we're doing more every every day. So that's not adding to debt, that's reducing debt. We have the lowest per capita debt of any state in the country. And if you looked at what your share as a Florida resident is for our outstanding state debt, it's about $400 a person. What is your outstanding share for The US federal debt? It's like a hundred and $5,000 a person and escalating. Ours is declining. You also look at Florida. We have the lowest number of state employees per capita. Don't have a big bureaucracy. We are also the second lowest in terms of spending per capita of any of all the 50 state.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

https://t.co/sVfqG4E8Tl

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 JUST IN: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signs new law in response to federal spending to allow Florida to recognize GOLD and SILVER as legal tender. "We've seen a lot of problems with the DC swamp. This is our ability to give you the financial freedom to be able to protect yourself against the declining value of the dollar." "We have the ability to do that under the federal constitution...we are the first large state to step up and to get this done." "This legislation will authorize money services, business like check cashers or PayPal, to transmit and - that means these precious metals can start functioning like real currency again, not just investment vehicles for the wealthy." "I'm really appreciative of the legislature for doing this." This bill was introduced in the legislature by Rep. Doug Bankson and Chip LaMarca, and Sen. Ana Maria Rodriguez.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is signing legislation to recognize gold and silver as legal tender in Florida, which they claim is permitted by the federal constitution. Florida is stated to be the first large state to do this. The legislation authorizes money service businesses to transmit and accept payment in gold and silver. The speaker claims this will allow precious metals to function as real currency, not just investment vehicles. They state gold prices have increased as investors hedge against rising bond yields. The speaker believes gold will likely hold its value compared to fiat currency. They cite the downgrade in the credit rating and problems in Washington D.C. as reasons for this bill, which they claim will give people the financial freedom to protect themselves against the declining value of the dollar.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The bill I'm gonna sign today is legislation that is gonna allow Florida to recognize gold and silver as legal tender in our state, and we have the ability to do that under the federal constitution. There are only two states that have done it thus far. They're smaller states. We are the first large state to step up and to get this done, and this is right out of the constitution of The United States. So this legislation will authorize money services business like check cashers or PayPal to transmit and accept payment in gold and silver. That means these precious metals can start functioning like real currency again, not just investment vehicles for the wealthy. And you notice what's happened in in recent weeks and months. How has gold gone down or has gold gone up? Gold's gone up big time because investors are looking at this and they're hedging against they see the bond yields have gone up. I think they moderate a little today. But when people start seeing that, gold is a place they're going to. So it's not just an investment. It'll be something that you're gonna be able to use, and it's something that is very likely to hold its value certainly compared to to fiat currency. Now we've seen the downgrade and the credit rating over multiple administrations. We've seen a lot of problems with the DC swamp. This is our ability to give you the financial freedom to be able to protect yourself against the declining value of the dollar. And so I'm really appreciative of the legislature legislature for doing this. I think this is something that shows Florida is continuing to lead on a lot of the issues that that matter to people, and I look forward to signing this in the law momentarily.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 BREAKING: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis just went OFF about no DOGE cuts being voted on by Congress. "DOGE fought the swamp, and so far, the swamp has won." "DON'T tell me it can't be done." "@ElonMusk went into this DOGE effort - he was getting LAMPOONED...firebombing his

Video Transcript AI Summary
A trillion-dollar deficit is a tax that permeates the economy. Elon Musk faced media attacks and business setbacks for advocating federal spending moderation. Despite a Republican Congress, no spending cuts have been implemented. This is why a balanced budget amendment and congressional term limits are needed. Doge and Elon Musk collided with the "swamp," and the swamp won. Florida has paid off 41% of its total historical debt since the speaker became governor and has the lowest per capita debt of any state. The state's per capita debt is about $400, while the US federal debt is about $105,000 per person and rising. Florida also has the lowest number of state employees per capita and is second-lowest in per capita spending among the 50 states.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trillion dollar deficit is a tax on you. It it it works its way through the economy. There's no free lunch, and that's what ends up happening. And I it's a little frustrating. You know, Elon Musk went into this Doge effort. He was getting lampooned. I mean, like, they're firebombing his Tesla dealerships. Media smearing him relentlessly. His businesses suffered all this stuff because he basically said, look, we can't keep doing this, and we need to moderate and reduce the amount of money that the federal government is spending. And yet, we have a Republican Congress. And to this day, we're in the the May, past memorial day, and not one cent in Doge cuts have been implemented by the congress. That's one of the reasons why we need a balanced budget amendment to the US constitution. Constitution. It's another reason why we need term limits for members of congress. But I think what you've seen with how and and I I kind of said this early on that Doge and Elon were on a collision course with the swamp. And the question is what would happen? And I don't think there's any question that Doge fought the swamp, and so far, the swamp has won. And that's just unfortunate, but I don't think you can look at this any other way. So this is hardwired into how the people in Washington are borrowing and spending your money. But it has huge implications, for the viability of our economy, our country, and everything going forward. And, you know, don't tell me it can't be done. When I became governor so if you look at, Florida's been a state for a hundred eighty years. If you look at all the debt that's been accumulated over our entire, history of statehood, just since I've been governor, we've paid off 41% of it, and we're doing more every every day. So that's not adding to debt, that's reducing debt. We have the lowest per capita debt of any state in the country. And if you looked at what your share as a Florida resident is for our outstanding state debt, it's about $400 a person. What is your outstanding share for The US federal debt? It's like a hundred and $5,000 a person and escalating. Ours is declining. You also look at Florida. We have the lowest number of state employees per capita. Don't have a big bureaucracy. We are also the second lowest in terms of spending per capita of any of all the 50 state.
Saved - August 22, 2025 at 1:13 PM

@1776General_ - The General

Great clip on the GOLD STANDARD. Show this to everyone you know. https://t.co/4ANId4EFif

Video Transcript AI Summary
America's gold was supposed to back the dollar. Leaving the gold standard was the most costly mistake we ever made. After the world war, they promised gold backed dollars, but they broke that promise. They printed paper backed by nothing, funded wars we couldn't afford and shouldn't have been involved in. But France caught on and sent a warship to get back their gold. Truth is, if more countries followed, our vaults would be empty and game secretary of the treasury to take the action necessary to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold. Turns out, when you fake the money, everything else follows and you screw the next generation over. Prices shot up, paychecks didn't, life got tougher, and nobody knew why.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: America's gold was supposed to back the dollar. Leaving the gold standard was the most costly mistake we ever made. Speaker 1: What was so bad about gold? It kept them honest, but they wanted power. You know, kid, folks today think this is just how life's supposed to be. Speaker 2: What do Speaker 1: you mean? Back in my day, one job could feed a family. My mother stayed home, father worked, and we ate together every night. Didn't realize how good we had it. After the world war, they promised gold backed dollars, but they broke that promise. They printed paper backed by nothing, funded wars we couldn't afford and shouldn't have been involved in. But France caught on and sent a warship to get back their gold. Truth is, if more countries followed, our vaults would be empty and game secretary of the treasury to take the action necessary to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold. Turns out, when you fake the money, everything else follows and you screw the next generation over. And it snowballs, kid. Prices shot up, paychecks didn't, life got tougher, and nobody knew why. We tried raising our kids the old way, but we didn't have the time or the money. Speaker 2: So you outsourced parenting? Yeah. Speaker 1: I guess you could say we did. Government schools raised them, and the TV taught them bad morals. They learned debt, not savings. Bought houses they couldn't afford. Played video games, gambling, antidepressants, and crimes. Families fractured. Divorce rates doubled. Birth rates plummeted. Things got so bad, people started financing Chipotle. Speaker 2: Financing a burrito? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's getting bad. Obesity. People eating cheap slop instead of real food. We got softer, sicker, and lazier. A nation in decline. But it didn't happen overnight. When Nixon left the gold standard, we traded sound money for a lifetime of debt. How will they ever pay it back? I don't think they plan to. Both sides keep spending like there's no tomorrow and leaving the bill to your generation. We didn't get it right, but you've still got a chance. So take the reins, kid. Hold your ground, and don't give up on sound money.
Saved - May 5, 2026 at 9:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report on governments designating massive AI data centers as military operations, stripping local control and replacing it with national security justifications. Texas’s Project Matador, Louisiana’s Meta expansion, and Utah’s Stratos bypass public input, with real-time facial recognition sparking alarms. This is unfolding now across the country. I also note that when money can be created without limits, purchasing power falls, pushing families toward gold and silver. Genesis Gold Group offers a Free Wealth Protection Guide; affiliate link disclosed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: Governments are now classifying massive AI data centers as “military operations,” quietly stripping communities of any power to stop them. Local control is disappearing fast. And it’s being replaced by national security justifications as residents are locked out of decisions that are quickly reshaping entire communities. Project Matador in Texas alone is expected to use up to 96 billion kWh annually—nearly half of all residential electricity in the state. And it’s just one of hundreds that are moving forward right now. In Louisiana, locals describe chaos as Meta’s expansion drives up costs and disrupts daily life. Now in Utah, the Stratos Project, backed by Kevin O’Leary and fast-tracked by Gov. Spencer Cox’s military authority, is bypassing public input entirely. Meanwhile, the technology these centers power is already raising alarms, including vehicles that can override drivers in real time through facial recognition systems. This is happening now. Watch what’s unfolding around the country before it reaches your area.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

History shows when money can be created without limits, purchasing power tends to go one direction, down. That’s the system most people are in today, and it’s why more families are looking at gold and silver as a way to protect what they’ve built. http://DailyPulseSilver.com 👈 Genesis Gold Group makes it simple to convert part of your IRA or 401k into precious metals with a clear, guided process. Get their Free Wealth Protection Guide now at http://DailyPulseSilver.com and see how it works. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

View Full Interactive Feed