reSee.it - Related Post Feed

realDonaldTrump
Posted - November 12, 2020 at 4:34 PM
Saved - June 24, 2024 at 6:17 AM

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN

RNCResearch
Posted - September 1, 2022 at 11:23 PM
Saved - June 17, 2024 at 9:58 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

Here’s something Joe Biden DOES NOT want you to see. WATCH: 10 minutes of Democrats denying election results. https://t.co/bJRbzEcIO2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss allegations of election interference and illegitimacy in past elections, particularly focusing on the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. They mention Russian interference, voter suppression, and issues with electronic voting machines. The overall sentiment is that elections have been stolen, leading to concerns about the integrity of the democratic process. The speakers express doubts about the legitimacy of certain election results, such as in Georgia and Ohio, and emphasize the need for fair and transparent elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you. Speaker 1: How can you win with Russian interference, though? Speaker 2: That's what we'll say. Speaker 1: About it Speaker 2: in 2020. But rightly. Speaker 1: Because I think you're the illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do you, you know, fight against that in 2020? Speaker 2: You are absolutely right. Speaker 3: He is Speaker 4: an illegitimate president in Speaker 5: my mind. Speaker 6: Would you be my vice presidential candidate? Folks, look. I absolutely agree. Speaker 5: Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered. Speaker 0: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 6: The president of elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. I Speaker 5: don't see this President-elect as a legitimate president. Speaker 6: You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election. Speaker 7: I do. We have a president who, if in fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may in fact not be a legitimate president. Speaker 0: The one thing that Trump is fearful of, when it comes to his being president is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. Speaker 8: I have an objection. Speaker 4: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I object because people are horrified. Speaker 0: He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 7: Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president? Speaker 9: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference. Speaker 10: But there absolutely is a cloud of illegitimacy. Speaker 6: So that legitimacy is in question? Yes. So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it's illegitimate. Speaker 7: Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Speaker 0: Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 11: Stolen emails. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump. Speaker 12: So do you believe president Trump is an illegitimate president? Speaker 5: Based on what I just said, which I can't retract. Speaker 6: The Russian attempt to to have the election. And, frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make makes his election illegitimate. Speaker 0: There was a widespread understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will be revealed, history will discover. But you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigan stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, woah, something's not right here. Speaker 9: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, you know, to what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in collusion with the Speaker 0: with with Russia. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 13: So, of course, he's obsessed with me, Speaker 0: and I believe that it's a guilty conscience. Speaker 14: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole my last presidential election. Speaker 6: If Al Gore won that election, Speaker 1: I think he won anyway. Speaker 12: Actually, I think I carried Florida. Speaker 13: Bush versus Gore. A court took away a presidency. Speaker 15: If all the votes were counted in Florida, then Al Gore would be president today and George Bush will be backing off. Speaker 16: I come from Florida where you and others participated in what I call the United States coup d'etat. Speaker 5: There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president. Speaker 17: I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 18: I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, delivery fraud, and an attempt to The chairman Speaker 12: must provide Speaker 4: is signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote count. To supreme court, not the Speaker 3: people of the United States decided this election. Speaker 7: Speaking to a democratic group in Chicago, Tuesday, he made it clear he thinks Al Gore was the winner. Speaker 6: For the time it was over, our candidate had won the popular vote, and the only way they could win the election was to stop the voting in Florida. Speaker 14: Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker, and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered with the results, Al Gore would be president. Speaker 9: The Supreme Court elected president. 4. Yes. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency. Speaker 15: But the Supreme Court tampered. That's a large charge. The Supreme Court stopped the counting of the votes, and if they let the count go on, Al Gore would have got the necessary vote. Speaker 16: The Supreme Court selected George w Bush as the president. He was not elected. Speaker 4: There is overwhelming evidence that George w Bush did not win this election. Speaker 19: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Speaker 5: I don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000 against our goal because I I think he probably lost Florida and also that nationwide. Speaker 15: If you invite me back on this show in about 8 weeks, I think you're gonna learn that Al Gore actually did get all the votes Speaker 20: The court has been thwarting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a five four vote enjoined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its 1st court appointed president. Speaker 14: I think in 2000, everybody thought, well, he did win the election. It'll go work. Speaker 16: After the election, when you stole election, you came back here and said, get over it. No. We're not gonna get over it. Speaker 14: You know it. I know it. They know it. We won that election. Speaker 13: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts, have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. Speaker 21: The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters. Speaker 17: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted. Speaker 6: The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems. Speaker 4: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all. Speaker 12: Based upon an inordinate number of allegations suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I join with my colleagues in objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes. As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, counted. Speaker 8: This last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at a fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen. Speaker 22: The wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. Two brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, own 80% of voting machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting. Speaker 23: There were numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of rejections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines. Speaker 13: As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity. There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our elections. Speaker 10: I agree with tens of 1,000,000,000 of Americans who are very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there is no paper trail to record that vote. Speaker 21: The numerous irregularities that occurred with the electronic voting machines in Ohio on November 2nd 2nd last year point to an unresolved national crisis. Speaker 4: We cannot declare that the election of November 2, 2000 and 4 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio. Speaker 24: I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable. Speaker 13: The members of congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. Speaker 12: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously flawed voting process that took place in so many of our states. Speaker 25: Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted. Speaker 26: One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states was the lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines. Speaker 6: In 2004, Speaker 1: they caused Democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their ballot. Speaker 6: They turned the Department of Civil Rights and the Justice Department into the Speaker 1: voter suppression division with voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation. Speaker 6: There aren't gonna be any more election stealing. Speaker 3: And despite the final tally and the inauguration and the situation we find ourselves in, I do have one very affirmative statement to say. Speaker 22: We won. Speaker 2: Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Speaker 7: You refuse to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. The election was not fair. The process was not fair. Speaker 1: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they stole it. It's clear. It's clear. Speaker 19: I think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her. Speaker 3: It was not a free and fair election. Speaker 11: Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams. Speaker 3: But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that.
GodndgunsReal
Posted - July 18, 2023 at 3:54 PM
Saved - July 19, 2023 at 2:41 AM

@GodndgunsReal - @Godndguns

Of course the guy with only 11 million twitter followers beat the guy with 90 million twitter followers......it's the age of #commoncore math don't you know .

Real_RobN
Posted - August 15, 2023 at 1:11 AM
Saved - August 15, 2023 at 2:32 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

BREAKING: DA Fani Willis releases Trump’s indictment, Data Integrity Group Trump’s 30,000 votes disappear Simultaneously in Dade County Georgia Trump 29,391 Joe Biden 17,218 8 minutes later Trump 17,218 Biden 29,391 Clear and exact switch of vote totals between candidates

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video highlights statistical irregularities and vote manipulation within the election database. It focuses on the example of Dodge County, where there were strange occurrences in the vote counts. Specifically, votes for Donald Trump were being switched and removed from his total, often coinciding with other updates to make it appear neutral. Across three counties, Trump lost over 30,000 votes. The video provides a clear example of vote count switching at the county level, where Trump's votes were swapped with Biden's. This type of manipulation can go undetected in state reporting if it falls between state refreshes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just seen a few examples of statistical irregularities and impossibilities. Now let's take a closer look at some vote manipulation within the election database including explicit vote count switching from 1 candidate to another. We can see in Dodge County, there's a lot of strange going on. The left side of the screen shows incremental votes as they were reported for both Election Day and Absentee. On the right, we can see the total vote counts which should only be incremental moving as the county reported in real time. Again, here we're focusing only on Donald Trump's votes. So this wouldn't necessarily be captured the state totals as they reported on TV. Since one county's deduction in votes can be offset by another county reporting of equal or greater boats. The first question you're gonna wanna ask or already have asked is, why or any VARs going negative. And the answer is they shouldn't. Unbeknownst to the general public, votes for Donald Trump were being switched and removed from his total, which often coincided with other precinct updates that simultaneously offset deductions so that they appear to remain neutral outside observers. Across the 3 counties of Dodge, Daughtry, and Putnam, Trump has over 30,000 votes that simply disappear. Here we have clear visibility of an event that occurred at the County level as we compare 2 data sources. In this case, Donald Trump reported 29,391 votes at 9:11 local time in Bibb County, Georgia. Simultaneously, Joe Biden was reported to have 17,218 votes. Minutes later, the next reported time update from the precinct data sources, Donald Trump is reported they have 17,218 votes and Biden now has 29,391 votes. A clear and exact switch of boat totals between candidates. Because there is a time lag between each state reported aggregation of county results, This type of switch can go undetected in state reporting as long as it falls after the latest state refresh and before the next state update.
LeadingReport
Posted - September 24, 2023 at 9:14 PM
Saved - September 24, 2023 at 11:54 PM

@LeadingReport - Leading Report

BREAKING: Election integrity experts report 26 strange huge net vote dumps for Joe Biden, of 25,000 or more, appeared on election night in 2020 in 14 states suspected of election fraud, with some having more than one spike; Pennsylvania had four spikes (none in favor of Trump).

theorangebeam
Posted - October 9, 2023 at 5:29 PM
Saved - October 20, 2023 at 4:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Video shows live vote switching on CNN, with exact number of votes flipping from one candidate to another. Over 15,000 votes switched from Trump to Biden in 2020 election. Contested instances like in Michigan were called glitches, but votes were eventually returned to Trump.

@theorangebeam - theorangebeam

ELECTION FRAUD WARNING! This video shows vote switching caught live on CNN. The exact same number of votes flips from one candidate to the other. Second in this video SHOWS OVER 15,000 VOTES BEING SWITCHED AWAY FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN in the 2020 election! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGl4V5rc3GQ

@theorangebeam - theorangebeam

Every time that this was caught and contested (as in Michigan with President Donald Trump) they called it a one time glitch and had to give him the votes back - and so did.

Real_RobN
Posted - November 11, 2023 at 7:09 PM
Saved - November 11, 2023 at 11:04 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Election deniers, conspiracy theorists and J6 political prisoners listen up, Voter fraud occurred on a massive scale the likes of which we’ve never witnessed in this county. 17, 327 dead people found in obituaries voted in Michigan 2020 presidential election. Check for yourself https://t.co/VcGuYct3BS

Video Transcript AI Summary
I witnessed numerous instances of irregularities during the election process. GOP challengers and I were not allowed to perform our duties properly, as Michigan laws require. Procedures were not followed, and our concerns were dismissed. We observed ballots being backdated and data being entered incorrectly. There have been many reports of voter fraud, including dead people voting. I have shared this information with Republican senators and representatives. The most important election in our history is at stake, and it is crucial for legislators to defend the constitution. Despite media claims, there is substantial evidence of widespread voter fraud. Time is of the essence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I witnessed personally, the following are only a few of the most egregious items witnessed. I was not allowed to perform my job and from what I observed were any of the GOP challengers in accordance with Michigan laws. We were constantly prevented from getting close enough to see what was going on with the respect with respect to the ballots, procedures were not being properly followed when we brought these to the attention of the supervisors, our concerns were dismissed and ignored. We observed ballots being backdated from 114 to 112, and data being entered into the computers for these mail in ballots. Poll workers were entering ballot information from new mail in ballots including dates of birth of 1/1/1900 into the electronic poll books and processing those ballots for tabulation. The information was not entered wasn't in either the electronic poll book or the paper supplement book prior to that. There's been, lots and lots of reports after the election counting process. First of all, I did email a copy of what I'm reading from to each of the Republican senators and the house of representative members. So I'd be happy to provide this to you. Dead people were voting. I they sent a website to that effect and the list that, they had up to that date was 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters that were registered for voting and were above the age of 80. Every name on this list has voted in the 2020 election check for yourself and has also been found in 1 or more of the obituaries online. This is the most important election in my life and I think the most important election in the history of our republic, every legislator whether seated in the House or the Senate, whether Democrat or Republican, took an oath to defend the US and state constitutions of, the US and Michigan against enemies both foreign and domestic. Time is of the essence, and now is the time to fulfill that oath. Despite what the media is telling everyone, there are mountains of evidence that voter fraud occurred on a massive Gail, the likes of which we've never witnessed in the country. 30 seconds. For those
BehizyTweets
Posted - November 14, 2023 at 7:49 PM
Saved - November 14, 2023 at 8:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a surprising turn of events, a video released by Pennsylvania election integrity group @Auditthevotepa reveals the removal of 350,000 in-person votes from the Republican Supreme Court Candidate. This unexplained decrease in votes raises concerns about the transparency of crucial elections, as seen previously with Trump in Pennsylvania. The candidate ultimately lost by 200k votes.

@BehizyTweets - George

In what world would votes ever go down in an election? This video shows 350,000 in-person votes being removed from the Republican Supreme Court Candidate in Pennsylvania The candidate ended up losing the race by 200k votes but no one has given any explanation as to how votes just go down in a crucial election like this. This is exactly what happened to Trump in Pennsylvania as well This video was released by Pennsylvania election integrity group @Auditthevotepa

LeadingReport
Posted - November 16, 2023 at 5:19 PM
Saved - November 16, 2023 at 5:23 PM

@LeadingReport - Leading Report

BREAKING: Audit the Vote PA has released a video showing 350,000 in-person votes being removed from the Republican Supreme Court candidate in Pennsylvania with no explanation, leading to the candidate losing by 200k votes. https://t.co/y6Cna43i5y

JDunlap1974
Posted - November 16, 2023 at 6:29 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 6:21 AM

@JDunlap1974 - 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA

🚨 ALERT 🚨🚨 BREAKING: Audit the Vote PA has released a video showing 350,000 in-person votes being removed from the Republican Supreme Court candidate in Pennsylvania with no explanation, leading to the candidate losing by 200k votes. 🚨🚨 https://t.co/t6t6iDweWY

polishprincessh
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 1:34 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 4:39 PM

@polishprincessh - 👑💥 Serenity 💥👑

On Nov 9 the reported count is 25,000 ballots less which is beyond the margin here than on Nov 10. So the day after the election they put what the count is and then magically 25,000 Bidens appear on Nov 10. https://t.co/tv0hrhifM5

Video Transcript AI Summary
On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And by the way, we have a manifestation which still is unexplained. On November 9th, the reported count is 25,000 ballots less, which is beyond the margin here, than on November 10th. So the day after the election, They don't they put out what the count is, and then magically 25,000 ballots appear on November 10th, and, well, hey, that's the race. It doesn't make sense. This is just flat wrong, what is going on here. The law is there for a reason. The law is there to protect the integrity of the vote.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 1:29 AM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 6:59 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here’s the first question the country asked on Nov 3, 2020. Did you see that? what the fuck just happened? Dominion at the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania deleting 423,166 votes from Trump. Live. “Again this is something that should never occur in an additive voting process.” https://t.co/eiLYCrrTsN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is unsure about certain things and mentions that they are yet to be decided. They mention that if things go as expected, certain states would be in favor of Trump. However, they also acknowledge that there may be surprises. They conclude by saying that the final outcome will likely be somewhere in the West Coast region, although it's not an exact prediction.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know that at the moment. These are to be decided, and that would push, you know and and again, if you think if you come at this from a this one's interesting. We expect them to get this. And these normally would be Trump states for you and Alaska. So, again, we're a little bit to being surprised, but if if it plays out if it plays out in a traditional map, that's where we're gonna be. That's where we'll be as we go to the West Coast close somewhere, somewhere in that ballpark, it's not an exact science. But somewhere in that ballpark, looking at
Video Transcript AI Summary
In district 10 of Allegheny County, there was a significant difference in the absentee vote ratio between Biden and Trump, with Biden receiving 17 votes for every 1 vote for Trump. Some precincts in this district even recorded 0 votes for Trump and hundreds for Biden. This is unusual considering that the county as a whole had a ratio of 4 Biden votes for every 1 Trump vote. Additionally, other districts in Allegheny voted 78% for Biden on average, while district 10 voted a staggering 93% for Biden. These anomalies resulted in over 23,000 votes for Biden and only 1300 for Trump. There were also strange patterns in the vote accumulation for both candidates, with Trump's totals increasing and then decreasing by significant amounts. The election officials have not provided explanations for these irregularities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're now looking at a specific district within Allegheny County. This is district 10, which has an absentee vote ratio between Biden and Trump of 17 Biden votes to 1 Trump vote. In some precincts within this district, Trump received 0 votes as Biden received hundreds. The reason we draw attention to this geography is because Allegheny County as a whole was closer to 4 Biden votes for 1 Trump vote, which is above average to begin with. In addition, all other Allegheny districts voted 78% Biden on average, while we see a staggering 93% here. This resulted in over 23,000 votes for Biden as Trump only received 1300. These statistical outliers fall well outside of normal distribution patterns, which are highly unlikely. Moving on from the statistically anomalous vote totals within an Allegheny district, as you can now see, Allegheny as a whole had the normal accumulation of absentee votes for Biden, except for 2 data points where it looks like data was deleted. Now if we look at Trump's vote accumulation, the data system logs report a 145,000 vote increase followed by a vote reset or deletion where he doesn't again reach those original absentee totals. And yet our elected officials are certifying these results without answering these questions or explaining what the reason is within the data. Where do the votes go? And it wasn't just absentee votes that log strange activity in Allegheny. The election day votes also go negative or decrease for Donald Trump. Looking from left to right, which represent the individual time updates where vote updates were released, Trump totals increased over 20,000, which were then removed as he falls back down to near 0. He continues to increase and then loses around 1300, over 800, around 1500 and then 1800 votes in succession. In total, over 27,000 votes are removed from Trump's cumulative totals. Why would a Pennsylvania election official in Allegheny boast about how the system is designed to block ballot observation?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses irregularities in the voting data in Esther County and Lehigh County. In Esther County, there are decreases in both absentee and election day votes, which is unusual. Trump loses a significant number of votes in both categories. In Lehigh County, Trump initially receives over 66,000 votes, which are then taken away and later restored through incremental updates. However, the updates do not match the exact amount that was removed. The speaker questions why these irregularities are occurring and what is the explanation behind them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Esther County. Before we begin, it's important to be reminded of how an incremental chart should look. From left to right, each vote total update should stay flat or increase only. When you see a decrease in the chart, that means votes are being removed. We can clearly see that both absentee and election day votes do not follow normal incremental behavior in Chester County. Trump loses almost 26,000 from his election day and nearly 50,000 from his absentee. He later loses over 9,000 and then again over 6,000 from his Election Day updates. Again, this is something that should never occur in an additive voting process. Lehigh county is another example of irregular activity within the election voting data. This is another time series example where we Move from left to right looking at the incremental vote totals, which should only be flat or incremental. We can see Trump out of the gates receives over 66,000 votes, which are then taken away from his counts. He then receives 3 incremental updates to get back to over 66,000. But if this were some kind of human error, Won't the total be updated directly back into the value that was removed? Why are updates of around 7,000, 18,000, 38,000 recorded? And why aren't the amounts not equal to what was taken away? What's going on here?
Real_RobN
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 1:29 AM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 6:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a conversation, @Real_RobN questions the deletion of 423,166 votes from Trump by Dominion in Pennsylvania. @KhomPewter analyzes Philadelphia's 2020 results, highlighting lopsided updates favoring Biden. @ShaunHumphrey65 claims Trump won Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona, suggesting the election was stolen.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here’s the first question the country asked on Nov 3, 2020. Did you see that? what the fuck just happened? Dominion at the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania deleting 423,166 votes from Trump. Live. “Again this is something that should never occur in an additive voting process.” https://t.co/eiLYCrrTsN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is unsure about certain things that are yet to be decided. They mention that if things go as expected, certain states would be in favor of Trump. However, they also acknowledge the possibility of being surprised. They mention that the final outcome will likely be somewhere in the West Coast region, but it's not an exact prediction.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know that at the moment. These are to be decided, and that would push, you know and and again, if you think if you come at this from a this one's interesting. We expect them to get this. And these normally would be Trump states for you and Alaska. So, again, we're a little bit to being surprised, but if if it plays out if it plays out in a traditional map, that's where we're gonna be. That's where we'll be as we go to the West Coast close somewhere, somewhere in that ballpark, it's not an exact science. But somewhere in that ballpark, looking at
Video Transcript AI Summary
In district 10 of Allegheny County, the absentee vote ratio between Biden and Trump was 17 to 1, with some precincts showing zero votes for Trump and hundreds for Biden. This is significant because the county as a whole had a ratio of 4 to 1 in favor of Biden. In addition, other districts in Allegheny voted 78% for Biden on average, while district 10 voted a staggering 93% for Biden. This resulted in over 23,000 votes for Biden and only 1,300 for Trump. These numbers are statistically unlikely and raise questions about the data. Furthermore, there were anomalies in both absentee and election day votes, with Trump's totals increasing and then decreasing by over 27,000 votes. The reason for these irregularities and the lack of explanation from officials is concerning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're now looking at a specific district within Allegheny County. This is district 10, which has an absentee vote ratio between Biden and Trump of 17 Biden votes to 1 Trump vote. In some precincts within this district, Trump received 0 votes as Biden received hundreds. The reason we draw attention to this geography is because Allegheny County as a whole was closer to 4 Biden votes for 1 Trump vote, which is above average to begin with. In addition, all other Allegheny districts voted 78% Biden on average, while we see a staggering 93% here. This resulted in over 23,000 votes for Biden as Trump only received 1300. These statistical outliers fall well outside of normal distribution patterns, which are highly unlikely. Moving on from the statistically anomalous vote totals within an Allegheny district, as you can now see, Allegheny as a whole had the normal accumulation of absentee votes for Biden, except for 2 data points where it looks like data was deleted. Now if we look at Trump's vote accumulation, the data system logs report a 145,000 vote increase followed by a vote reset or deletion where he doesn't again reach those original absentee totals. And yet our elected officials are certifying these results without answering these questions or explaining what the reason is within the data. Where do the votes go? And it wasn't just absentee votes that log strange activity in Allegheny. The election day votes also go negative or decrease for Donald Trump. Looking from left to right, which represent the individual time updates where vote updates were released, Trump totals increased over 20,000, which were then removed as he falls back down to near 0. He continues to increase and then loses around 1300, over 800, around 1500 and then 1800 votes in succession. In total, over 27,000 votes are removed from Trump's cumulative totals. Why would a Pennsylvania election official in Allegheny boast about how the system is designed to block ballot observation?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses irregularities in the voting data in Esther County and Lehigh County. In Esther County, there are decreases in both absentee and election day votes, which is unusual. Trump loses a significant number of votes in both categories. In Lehigh County, Trump initially receives over 66,000 votes, but they are then taken away and he receives incremental updates to reach that number again. The speaker questions why the updates are not equal to the votes that were removed and what is causing these discrepancies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Esther County. Before we begin, it's important to be reminded of how an incremental chart should look. From left to right, each vote total update should stay flat or increase only. When you see a decrease in the chart, that means votes are being removed. We can clearly see that both absentee and election day votes do not follow normal incremental behavior in Chester County. Trump loses almost 26,000 from his election day and nearly 50,000 from his absentee. He later loses over 9,000 and then again over 6,000 from his Election Day updates. Again, this is something that should never occur in an additive voting process. Lehigh county is another example of irregular activity within the election voting data. This is another time series example where we Move from left to right looking at the incremental vote totals, which should only be flat or incremental. We can see Trump out of the gates receives over 66,000 votes, which are then taken away from his counts. He then receives 3 incremental updates to get back to over 66,000. But if this were some kind of human error, Won't the total be updated directly back into the value that was removed? Why are updates of around 7,000, 18,000, 38,000 recorded? And why aren't the amounts not equal to what was taken away? What's going on here?

@KhomPewter - Khom Pewter

🚨🚨🚨Analysis on Philadelphia & surrounding counties 2020: Biden draws over 10,000 net votes in batch updates where the ratio of Biden vote to Trump vote is greater than 100 to 1. The most lopsided update in the batch that results in 444 votes Biden : 1 vote Trump. Biden had established a level of support at 29 votes to 1 Trump vote in the set of Philadelphia precincts where this happens. Even with a support advantage established as lopsided as 29 to 1, the probability of a truly random batch of ballots arriving as a sequence 444 votes Biden : 1 vote Trump is an odds of 0.0000486%. https://x.com/KhomPewter/status/1718792531985461652?s=20

@KhomPewter - Khom Pewter

There's been several instances where people have challenged or inquired about the analysis I performed on the Philadelphia 2020 election data, findings that were conveyed via a series of frequency distribution charts shown here. (see attached images) This analysis was…

@ShaunHumphrey65 - Shaun Humphrey

@KhomPewter @KarenCFL23 @Real_RobN Trump won Pennsylvania Trump won Wisconsin Trump won Michigan Trump won Georgia Trump won Nevada Trump won Arizona (@KariLake also won AZ) 2020 was stolen

Real_RobN
Posted - December 21, 2023 at 10:07 PM
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 11:18 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Election deniers, conspiracy theorists and J6 political prisoners listen up. 30,000 unfolded fake ballots 97% for Robert L. Peters, 97% for John Assoff. Out of a batch of 950 military mail in ballots Robert L. Peters recieved 950, Trump 0. All in exact sequential order. https://t.co/LDGA6RQIfB

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are six affidavits from veteran election officials alleging that up to 30,000 of the 147 ballots in question are counterfeit. The evidence includes different paper used for these ballots, the absence of folds despite being absentee ballots, the same bubble mark on a large number of ballots, and the claim that the marks were made by a machine, not a pen or pencil. Additionally, an analysis of 950 military mail-in ballots showed that all 950 votes went to Joe Biden, while none went to Trump, and they were in sequential order. These findings are considered highly unlikely and raise questions about the integrity of the election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's the 2 key things is, were there counterfeit ballots? 6 affidavits now. We had 4 now at 6. 6 affidavits of veteran election officials are alleging that up to 30,000 of these 147 ballots are fake. Somebody printed them up on a machine and ran them through the vote counting machines. They're not real. They're not attached to anybody. They have 4 pieces of evidence for this. None of these are going away. None of these can be explained. Number 1, they're on different paper. What kind of paper are they on? Why isn't it the same paper that everything else is on? Number 2, they're not folded. Well, what do you mean they're not folded? In order to get an absentee ballot, You have to get it in the mail, which means that the Department of Elections in Georgia machine folded the ballot. You can't have a ballot in an envelope that you mail back or Dropbox back that's not folded. You either got it folded or you send it back folded or both with an envelope. So why aren't they folded? Number 3, you've got 30 you've got the same exact bubble mark on the ballot the same one for upwards of 30,000 of these ballots, 97% of them voting for Joe Biden, 97% voting for John Ossoff. And the fourth thing is the affidavits say that these, the bubble marks are not made by an ink pen or a pencil, that they're made by a machine. These are the things that they're going to look at. Now They did an analysis batch of 950 military ballots. Nine fifty. I want you to grasp what the findings are, and this is a matter of public record. Nobody made this up. Out of a batch of 950 military mail in ballots. Joe Biden got 950 votes. Trump, 0. That's a 100%. That is virtually impossible to have happen. Not only that, they were in sequential order. That's also in public. That means that every ballot that came in in the mail is somehow in exact sequential order. How is that possible?
JDunlap1974
Posted - June 15, 2024 at 11:49 AM
Saved - June 15, 2024 at 2:43 PM

@JDunlap1974 - JOSH DUNLAP

REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN. https://t.co/YcZiUSxTiF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats mistakenly received votes meant for Republicans in Michigan due to a software glitch, causing a 6,000 vote swing. The county clerk admitted to the error, prompting a hand count of all ballots in one county. It was discovered that 47 counties used the same software, raising concerns about similar discrepancies. Transparency and scrutiny are needed in Michigan's election process. Translation: Due to a software error, votes were incorrectly assigned to Democrats instead of Republicans in Michigan, leading to a significant swing in votes. This mistake has raised concerns about the accuracy of the election results in 47 counties that used the same software. Transparency and careful review of the results are necessary for the people of Michigan.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For Democrats that were meant for Republicans causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said, tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the votes. Since then, we have now discovered that 47 counties use this same software in the same capacity. Interim County had to hand count all of the ballots, and these counties that use this software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies. The people of Michigan deserve a transparent and open process.
Real_RobN
Posted - August 11, 2024 at 8:18 PM
Saved - August 12, 2024 at 12:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some concerning information about the integrity of the voting process in Pennsylvania. An insider from the Obama administration, now involved with Dominion voting machines, was seen with a vDrive key that allegedly has the power to manipulate election results. I witnessed Jim Savage at the counting center on November 5th, where he was plugging in the vDrive, which reportedly flipped 50,000 votes for Trump. A whistleblower emphasized the significance of this key, claiming it can control the voting machines and potentially change election outcomes.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, the common wealth of Pennsylvania, 🚨🚨IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE: an Obama insider wishing Trump for Christmas in handcuffs, now in charge of Dominion voting machines. Jim savage held up in his hand a fairly large vDrive key and said, “You can overthrow the United States government with this.” Princess Leah: “On Nov 5th I observed Savage into the counting center… And that’s when Jim savage was plugging vDrives into the computer. It flipped Trump votes by 50,000, Whistleblower: “Jim savage held up in his hand a fairly large vDrive key and said this is extremely important. This controls all of the votes. This controls how the machine runs this. YOU CAN CHANGE AN ELECTION WITH THIS.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Multiple witnesses reported that ballots were reversed, affecting around 50-70 votes within the first hour of polling. The problem persisted throughout the day, with the voting machine warehouse supervisor, James Savage, identified as the source. Savage, a high-level Democrat operative, was seen plugging v drives into the computer system, potentially altering votes. Another witness observed Savage inserting USB drives into voting machines days after the election, allegedly flipping 50,000 votes. This manipulation was deemed crucial as it controlled the election outcome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it reversed, the ballots. I would say at least, like, anywhere between 5070 votes. Speaker 1: In what time period? Speaker 0: Within the first hour. Speaker 1: And how long did this problem last? Speaker 0: The entire day. So the person that identified the problem, was the, voting machine warehouse supervisor, James Savage. He arrived to our precinct about 2 and a half hours after we opened, and, he told us that the ballots the ballot barcodes were deformed. So when he arrived, he arrived with, 3 other gentlemen. And when they arrived at the poll to try to address the situation, he did not troubleshoot anything. He, just made a statement, and he did not replace anything, and there was no work done on any of the scanners. Speaker 2: Jim Savage has been a high level Democrat operative for years. He was vice chair of the Delaware County Democratic Party, vice president of the Philadelphia AFL CIO, and even a DNC delegate. He's worked for everyone. From Obama to Bernie Sanders, publicly boasting that all he wanted for Christmas was Donald Trump and handcuffs. And now he's in charge of Pennsylvania's voting machines. Speaker 0: When I was there on November 5th, I observed Savage walking into the counting center in, the Wharf in Chester unaccompanied. He had a plastic bag in his hand that was unsealed. He had gone into the back room, and then he came back out. And that is when he had the, VJIVES in his hand, and I had watched him stand over top of a gentleman with white hair. He was a heavyset gentleman with a blue light blue shirt on. He had asked him to log in to the, computer system, which is which was the tabulation area, and that's when Jim Savage was plugging v drives into the computer. Speaker 2: A second witness also watched the changing of the votes with the v drives. Speaker 3: He walked in on the 3 days after the election, and he took a bunch of USB 6, and he plugged them into the voting machines. I watched them. I testified to it. It's it's it's just clear. It flipped the vote by 50,000 Speaker 1: key, and he said this is extremely important. This controls Speaker 4: all of the volts. Votes. This controls how the machine runs. This Speaker 1: you can change and elect
Video Transcript AI Summary
A senior law enforcement officer witnessed unauthorized individuals inserting USBs into voting machines multiple times. Despite demands for forensic evidence collection, no action was taken. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, leaving 100,000-120,000 ballots in question with no remedy available. The speaker believes certifying the vote would be unconscionable. Translation: A senior law enforcement officer saw unauthorized people inserting USBs into voting machines multiple times. Despite requests for forensic evidence collection, no action was taken. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, leaving 100,000-120,000 ballots in question with no solution available. The speaker believes certifying the vote would be unethical.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of the deputy sheriff who was there stationed. He was a senior law enforcement officer, and I brought it to the attention of the clerk of elections. I brought it to their attention. I objected. And I said, this person is not being observed. He's not part of the process that I can see and he's walking in with baggies which we have pictures of and it was submitted in our affidavits and he was sticking these USBs into the machines. So, I personally witnessed over that that happened 24 times, over 24 times. We have multiple other witnesses to start including democrat poll watchers. And we were told, I was told the next day, by the, solicitors, well, actually not the solicitor but the attorney that we had secured that they said every election, they leave a couple of USBs in the voting machines and they're brought back and generally the warehouse manager comes over and puts them in. So in talking to, U. S. Attorney General, McSwain, and other, law enforcement officers, I found out that was not the case. That generally, you know, more than 2 is unusual. So they denied they did it. But, as of today, 47 USBV cards are missing and they're nowhere to be found. So I was told personally that these 32 these 24 to 30 cards that were uploaded, weren't there. Those cards, I demanded that the, they didn't update the vote live time. They only updated it about once every 2 or 3 hours. I demanded they uploaded the vote so I could see what the result was and it was 50,000 votes. And I think as a computer scientist, an American, and a patriot, it doesn't matter who those 50,000 votes were. I'll tell you they were vice president Biden. But what was shocking to me as an American, as someone who has gone to sea, gone to war, that, that could even happen. Really upsetting to me and the most upsetting was I had spoke to multiple law enforcement agencies and literally begged multiple law enforcement agencies. They said, go in. And it's in order to prove that nothing's happening in either exonerate yourselves in the process or refute what I'm saying, please. It's very simple process. Just go get the forensic evidence from the computers. It's a simple process. You take the you turn the computer off. It's nondestructive. Takes moments, maybe half an hour, 20 minutes to do it properly and collect the evidence. You open the computer up. You take a a a device called a bit blocker. You put it in the hard drive. It's done under the observation of law enforcement officers. They take a forensic image of the drive. Put it all back together. It wouldn't have taken more than an hour to to image all 5 machines. That was never done despite my objections, and that was 3 weeks ago. Lastly, when they said they said, well, we've got all the forensic records and so forth. We just learned 2 days ago that virtually all chain of custody logs, records, yellow sheets, everything was gone. All forensic evidence, all custody sheets in Delaware County are gone. They had a signing party where they sat down, and poll workers were invited back to recreate those logs. And our understanding as of today was that they were unsuccessful in getting them all. So we have a situation where we have 100,000 ballots to 120,000 ballots, both mail in the USB, They're in question. Now there's no cure for this. There's no remedy for this. As a home as a home charter, we can we could have a reelection in Delaware County for our own representatives within our own town, but there is no sure for that for the president of the United States. And I believe as a citizen and an observer to this that anybody could certify that vote in any good conscience.

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN

MichelleRM68
Posted - November 3, 2024 at 4:39 PM
Saved - November 3, 2024 at 7:44 PM

@MichelleRM68 - Michelle #FKH

Trump was beating Biden in Michigan by 208, 546, when we went to bed on Nov 3rd. Only a few hours later, Biden was only down 70,207! That means he received 100% of the 138,336 votes that magically appeared overnight! THIS IS WHAT WE'RE UP AGAINST ON TUESDAY EVERYONE!!!👇 https://t.co/6xdRYCM5so

Real_RobN
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 4:50 PM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 2:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared about "Hammer and Scorecard" on Conspiracy Day, November 3, 2020. NSA Senior Analyst Kirk Wiebe confirmed that vote totals were manipulated in real-time across battleground states. I noted a clear switch in votes: Trump went from 29,391 to 17,218, while Biden flipped to 29,391 from 17,218.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is, Hammer and Scorecard, As Witnessed On National TV On CONSPIRACY DAY November 3, 2020, NSA SENIOR ANALYST KIRK WIEBE CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, “As totals are reported via the internet, the data is grabbed in realtime, CHANGED and sent on its way across every battleground state.” Trump 29,391 Joe Biden 17,218 8 minutes later Trump 17,218 Biden 29,391 Clear and exact switch of vote totals between candidates. 30,000 of them.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Powell, the attorney for General Michael Flynn, appeared on Lou Dobbs and discussed significant findings related to voter fraud. She mentioned that data from whistleblower Dennis Montgomery, who has been instrumental in this matter, reveals forensic evidence of altered data, including its origins and destinations. This evidence indicates direct proof of voter fraud linked to the use of a system known as Hammer and Scorecard, which allegedly manipulated citizens' votes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Powell, the personal attorney of General Michael Flynn, and someone who is known to the president of the United States, appeared on Lou Dobbs this evening and reported this fact. And she added the fact that data has been obtained from the whistleblower who built the capability, mister Dennis Montgomery, who is a national hero in this matter, having made this data available. There is forensic evidence showing what data was changed, where it came from, and where it was going to. And a record is kept. That means there is direct solid evidence of voter fraud perpetrated by the people that are operating this hammer scorecard combination to change the votes of the citizens of this country. And
Video Transcript AI Summary
Examples of statistical irregularities in election data reveal vote manipulation, particularly in Dodge County. Incremental vote counts for Donald Trump show discrepancies, with some votes appearing to switch or disappear. Notably, over 30,000 of Trump's votes vanished across Dodge, Daughtry, and Putnam counties. A specific instance in Bibb County, Georgia, illustrates this: Trump had 29,391 votes at one point, while Biden had 17,218. Shortly after, Trump's votes dropped to 17,218, and Biden's rose to 29,391, indicating a direct switch. Such manipulations can go unnoticed due to the time lag in state reporting, allowing discrepancies to appear neutral to observers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Few examples of statistical irregularities and impossibilities. Now let's take a closer look at some vote manipulation within the election database, including explicit vote count switching from one candidate to another. You can see in Dodge County, there's a lot of strange activity going on. The left side of the screen shows incremental votes as they were reported for both election day and absentee. On the right, we can see the total vote counts, which should only be incremental, moving as the county reported in real time. Again, here, we're focusing only on Donald Trump's votes. So this wouldn't necessarily be captured the state totals as they reported on TV since one county's deduction in votes can be offset by another county's reporting of equal or greater votes. The first question you're gonna wanna ask or already have asked is, why are any bars going negative? And the answer is, they shouldn't. Unbeknownst to the general public, votes for Donald Trump were being switched and removed from his total, which often coincided with other precinct updates that simultaneously offset deductions so that they appeared to remain neutral to outside observers. Across the three counties of Dodge, Daughtry, and Putnam, Trump has over 30,000 votes that simply disappear. Here, we have clear visibility of an event that occurred at the county level as we compare 2 data sources. In this case, Donald Trump reported 29,391 votes at 9:11 local time in Bibb County, Georgia. Simultaneously, Joe Biden was reported to have 17,218 votes. Minutes later, at the next reported time update from the precinct data sources, Donald Trump is reported to have 17,218 votes, and Biden now has 29,391 votes, a clear and exact switch of vote totals between candidates. Because there is a time lag between each state recorded aggregation of county results, this type of switch can go undetected in state reporting as long as it falls after the latest state refresh and before the next state update.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On election night, real-time vote totals were provided by data collectors like Edison to media companies. For instance, during a CNN broadcast, Pennsylvania's vote count showed a sudden switch: Trump had 1,690,589 votes, and Biden had 1,252,537. Moments later, the count changed to 1,670,631 for Trump and 1,272,495 for Biden, indicating a 19,958 vote switch from Trump to Biden, effectively making Trump lose nearly 40,000 votes. Votes are collected at precincts, which transmit results to counties and then to the state. All data is sent to cloud servers for live totals, which are then relayed to data aggregators like Edison for distribution to media outlets.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To bed, and then this happened. Speaker 1: On election night, real time coverage of vote totals and updates were handed down by data collectors such as Edison and sent to various media companies. This is an entirely automated process with only a one way interface on the side of those media companies to the sources. In the following video example, CNN experiences an on camera switch in their reporting for the state of Pennsylvania. The county source is feeding live on television a count of 1,690,589 votes for Trump and 1,252,537 votes for Biden. The time is approximately 11:0:8:28 seconds Eastern Standard. The next time Pennsylvania is shown on the screen, there are 1,670,631 votes for Trump and 1,272,495 votes for Biden. The time is approximately 11:09, one second Eastern Standard. Live on television, CNN demonstrated a 19,958 exact vote switch from candidate Trump to candidate Biden. This means Trump lost nearly 40,000 votes. Speaker 0: How did this happen? So when you vote, you vote in a precinct, and a precinct of vote either goes through an adjudication route if there's a problem or directly to the precinct tabulators. The precincts transmit these directly to the county and the county to the state while all 3 transmit back to cloud servers for live totaling. Those servers transmit to data aggregators like Edison, who then transmit that data directly to, for instance, the national election pool.

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN

iluminatibot
Posted - November 5, 2024 at 8:15 AM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 11:48 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Never forget! Between the hours of 1 AM and 5 AM, in PA, Joe Biden gained nearly 600,000 votes, which is statistically impossible. They did it once, and they're going to try to do it again!

Real_RobN
Posted - November 5, 2024 at 5:11 PM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 10:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dear Michigan, this is how they overthrew your government. Dominion deleted 2.7 million Trump votes nationwide, switched 221,000 votes in Pennsylvania, and deleted 941,000 Trump votes. States using Dominion systems switched 435,000 votes from Trump to Biden. When caught, they call it a glitch.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Dear Michigan, this is how they overthrew your government. • DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. • 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. • 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. • STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” AND WHEN THEY GET CAUGHT, THEY CALL IT A GLITCH.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ballots intended for Republicans were mistakenly counted for Democrats, resulting in a 6,000 vote swing. The county clerk revealed that a glitch in the tabulating software caused this miscalculation. It has since been found that 47 counties utilize the same software. Antrim County had to conduct a hand count of all ballots, highlighting the need for these counties to thoroughly review their results for similar issues. The people of Michigan deserve a transparent and open electoral process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the votes. Since then, we have now discovered that 47 counties use this same software in the same capacity. Antrim County had to hand count all of the ballots, and these counties that use this software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies. The people of Michigan deserve a transparent and open process.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Dear Michigan, this is how dominion voting machines just rigged the Michigan Election. https://t.co/y4NBDhhBA3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dominion machines are certified and sealed, but vulnerabilities allow for manipulation. Just before elections, a supposed "glitch" prompts an emergency patch that opens a backdoor for remote access from a Serbian office, which is the true operational center of Dominion. This office, staffed by Chinese nationals, allows them to log into U.S. election machines and alter results. They use virtual machines to manipulate data without leaving traces. After the manipulation, they collapse the virtual server, making detection difficult unless a thorough forensic audit is conducted. This entire operation relies on Huawei equipment, linking back to China. For more information, visit Stolen Elections Facts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Dominion machines, they get certified and sealed up and implemented. And then there's 15 different ways that the cheat occurs. But one of them is they right before the election, they have some glitch appear and they say, oh, we need to download a patch on an emergency basis. And then what the patch does is it opens up a a a hole in the back of the system from which they log on from their Serbian office. They don't they don't really admit this. They didn't even admit they had a Serbian office. But the truth is Dominion, which is supposed to be a US company, the US company is just a front. The real center of gravity of Dominion is Serbia. And they've got a technical office there. And when it was discovered, they said, well, it it kind of does just R and D. No. It's the center of gravity. And they log on from they log on to the back of our machines from Serbia, and they manipulate election results. And I have this dead to rights, we have this dead to rights. And what gets even funnier is they're doing this on Huawei machines. Our elections are effectively being run on Huawei machines, which are Chinese servers. And the truth is behind Serbia is China. So China, there's a military institute in China, which is coming in through Serbia. There's Chinese nationals in the Serbian office, and they're logging on to our machines in the middle of election. I can even tell you how they do it. There's such a thing in computers, been around in the public for about 20 years, called virtual machines. You create within a server, you create a virtual machine. And so to an operator of that machine, it looks like he's operating on 2 machines. It just operates like there's a but really that second machine is all in software and and it's all software. It's not there's no physical machine. What they do is they come in through a back door that's opened up by this patch. They create a virtual machine within that machine within the actual county election equipment. From that virtual machine, they then manipulate the results, the database, the hard the data on the database, any way they want. When they're done, they withdraw and they collapse that virtual server. So there's no record of nothing. There's a unless you go in and do a bits and bytes forensic audit, when you go in later and you look at the actual machine and all of its systems, you don't see anything. It's only if you do forensic you discover that somewhere in the middle of it all, they created a virtual machine inside, did all the manipulation through that. That's actually done from Serbia and behind Serbia the in Serbia, there are Chinese nationals doing it. Behind them, there's people in China, and this is all done on Huawei equipment. And if this sounds crazy, go to a website called Stolen Elections Facts, stolen elections, plural, facts.com. It's all the documentation is laid out there.
MJTruthUltra
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 11:00 AM

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Ps… don’t tell me I haven’t done anything regarding election integrity. I documented the fraud in incredible detail. Documents, videos, and data.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

MASTER THREAD 🧵 THE 2020 ELECTION The most “secure” election in history I literally have thousands of clips and data point proving the election was rigged. But I will try my best to consolidate as much information as I can, showing how they are rigging elections. START HERE: •The entire election was decided by 4 extreme updates, which statistically hold a probability rate of less than 0.1% of happening…. Which basically means it’s damn near impossible what happened. •Cyber Security experts identified higher than normal errors rates in various states; the highest being 68.05%. ◦The Federal Election Commission guidelines state than an error rate of 0.008% is an indicator of fraud. Again, the highest error rate found was 68.05%. •No sitting President in 132 years has ever gained votes between his first & second race & lost re-election. Trump gained at the very least 11 million more votes in 2020 then he did in 2016. •During the California count, the data showed that a singular vote was not counted for one person. ◦In fact, a singular vote was fractionalized and divided up at a rate of approximately 66% for Biden, 32% for Trump, & 1-2% for other candidates. Here are JUST A FEW other data points to look at: •MICHIGAN ◦Antrim Michigan, during the forensic report of the audit of Dominion Voting System tabulator machine software, it was discovered that someone had attempted to zero out all election results at 13:53:09 on Nov 21st. This is a clear & unchallenged example of direct tampering with evidence. ◦The most extreme “update” came on Nov 4, at 6:30AM ET, where there was a ballot dump of 41,258 votes for Biden & Trump only got 5,968 votes. That is where this image below you’ve probably seen on social media came from. •On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 293,052 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 154,188 vote “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in. •ARIZONA ◦AZ had 2,000 voters who were “registered” to a vacant lot ◦22,093 “mail-in” ballots were “received” the day before they were mailed. How does that happen? ◦The Maricopa County AZ Hearing, available on Rumble, if anything, should be all you need to hear regarding election fraud. All videos of the hearing have been scrubbed from Youtube. Trump “lost” Arizona by a little more than 10,000 votes. Within the first 20 minutes of this hearing, you will hear that there were over 17,000 DUPLICATE ballots found during the forensic audits, in this one county alone; not to mention hundreds of thousands of ballots in question on the IT router/data side which is described later in the hearing. It is undeniable. •WISCONSIN ◦On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 112,022 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 20,682 “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in. •PENNSYLVANIA ◦On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 555,189 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 81,660 vote “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in.

Real_RobN
Posted - May 17, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Saved - May 19, 2025 at 1:50 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Your government was effectively overthrown on November 3, 2020, after six swing states stopped counting simultaneously on election night. https://t.co/uEfemZBYsR

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN

its_The_Dr
Posted - June 18, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Saved - June 18, 2025 at 9:52 PM

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

2020 https://t.co/y9FQdM4Gvt

Real_RobN
Posted - July 24, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 3:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Just wait—if you thought 2016 was bad, 2020 will reveal even more. Reports indicate that 2.7 million Trump votes were deleted nationwide, with significant vote switching in Pennsylvania. States using Dominion systems reportedly switched hundreds of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Just wait—if you thought 2016 was bad, wait until 2020 gets declassified. 2016 was just an attempted overthrow; 2020 was the overthrow.” REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN. @ChanelRion @OANN

Real_RobN
Posted - April 28, 2026 at 7:17 PM
Saved - April 28, 2026 at 11:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount an IT forensic expert accessing a Dominion image in Mesa County, claiming the U.S. government was overthrown on Nov 3, 2020, across every swing state. In Pennsylvania on CNN, Trump led 1,690,589 to Biden 1,252,537 at 11:08 EST; at 11:09, Trump 1,670,631 and Biden 1,272,495, with 19,958 votes switched and Tina Peters in prison.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here it is: An IT forensic expert, after gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion Rigging Management System in Mesa County, Colorado, demonstrates how the United States government was overthrown on November 3, 2020—without a trace. ——This happened across every single swing state in the Union. In Pennsylvania, live on CNN: Trump had 1,690,589 votes. Biden had 1,252,537 votes. The time was approximately 11:08 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump’s votes decreasing to 1,670,631 and Biden’s votes increasing to 1,272,495. The time was approximately 11:09 p.m. Live on CNN, exactly 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden, and Tina Peters is rotting in prison.

View Full Interactive Feed