reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@LegendreKristy - Kristy Legendre
Here’s the link to the full video for anyone interested!
@TaTaTacticals - AnonymousMC
https://youtu.be/wGK_5VjB4Uw?si=OZrWAXFzRDpDr5Sx https://t.co/Z6iYG2l6xb
@TaTaTacticals - AnonymousMC
@reSeeIt save thread
@TaTaTacticals - AnonymousMC
https://youtu.be/-vdAjtGw2hQ?si=CyAN69RiKolvmYGs https://t.co/LAVU6mtKNQ
@libertyleighton - Leighton Radner/Outlawed Thoughts
Project 112 (audio only) full video coming soon. https://t.co/AQ010Nh96S
Video Transcript AI Summary
The military industrial complex often evokes images of soldiers in combat, but it encompasses much more. In light of recent global events, previously taboo topics, including government secrecy around bio labs, have gained attention. One notable example is Project 112, authorized in 1962 under Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara. This project involved extensive testing of biological and chemical agents, including VX nerve gas, Sarin, and E. Coli, across various locations. The aim was to explore controlled temporary incapacitation as a military strategy. The government denied Project 112's existence until 2000, raising concerns about the safety of military personnel involved, many of whom were unaware of the risks. The project reflects a troubling reality where governments that condemn bioweapons may simultaneously engage in their development, leaving the public unaware of the potential dangers lurking in their midst.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When delving into the intricate web of the military industrial complex, it's common for people to conjure images of soldiers traversing the arid deserts of Afghanistan or the scorched jungles of Vietnam. However, this perception, while not entirely misplaced, is merely a fragment of the colossal military landscape. The military industrial complex thrives on this limited understanding, capitalizing on the public's tendency to perceive its actions through this narrow lens. In the wake of the COVID 19 pandemic, which the federal government leveraged as a sledgehammer to demolish individual rights and the subsequent escalation of geopolitical tensions in Ukraine and Israel, certain topics, long confined to the realm of conspiracy theories, began to surface openly. Even issues that had once been considered taboo and the mere discussion of which was punishable on social media platforms suddenly found themselves thrust into the public eye.
This newfound transparency brought forth a legion of media spokespersons and government loyalists, each attempting to downplay the government's historical misdeeds. Their focus primarily honed in on bio bio labs as the United States had established such facilities in countries in which it shared affiliations. The primary motive behind its secrecy was not to shield these installations from enemy nations, foreign officials or rival militaries. Rather, it was to keep these operations cloaked from the watchful eyes of the American public. Throughout the annals of history, the government, particularly its military and scientific apparatus, has been embroiled in a plethora of covert projects akin to the clandestine operations orchestrated by fictional Bond villains.
These endeavors span mind manipulation, the development of novel drugs, the creation of insidious toxins. Today, we embark on a journey into one such secret adventure, a project that the government was adamant about keeping hidden from the prying eyes of the public and whose full extent remains shrouded in mystery to this day. Project 112. In 1962, during the tenure of president John f Kennedy, secretary of defense Robert McNamara sanctioned project 112. It bore the numerical label 112 as part of a broader collection 100 and 50 projects authorized under McNamara's directive.
Project 112 boasted full scale backing and personnel from every branch of the US Armed Forces and various intelligence agencies, forging partnerships that extended beyond US borders to encompass their Canadian counterparts, much like MK Ultra. Project 1 twelve's primary objective was to explore the realm of controlled temporary incapacitation, CTI, a term shrouded in euphemism. These enigmatic tests unfolded at various locations, including the Porton Down campus in the United Kingdom, Ralston in Canada, no fewer than 13 different American warships, and far flung reaches like Alaska and Australia. The experimentation involved the litany of aerosols as carriers for biological and chemical agents, resulting in over 50 tests conducted, 18 of which involved biological agents with an additional 14 exploring the realm of chemical agents. Military claims this was for testing vulnerabilities in US Navy ships.
Here are just 3 of the agents tests were done on. Vx nerve agent. Vx is a highly toxic compound that disrupts the normal functioning of the nervous system. Exposure to vx can lead to severe health problems and even death. Sarin gas.
Exposure to Sarin can result in death or short term health effects, including seizures, paralysis, and difficulty breathing. E. Coli bacteria. Biological agents like E. Coli were used in some experiments to evaluate the impact of bacterial contamination.
The focus here wasn't simply on the malevolence of these agents, but rather how they could be effectively of these agents, but rather how they could be effectively launched via aerosols or small bombs with the ultimate goal of wielding them as offensive weapons or defensive shields. The paradox, however, lies in the fact that governments that vigorously caution against the use of bioweapons and chemical agents often find themselves implicated in their deployment. Astonishingly, the federal government denied the existence of project 112 until the year 2000, a revelation that arrived nearly 4 decades after its clandestine inception. One can't help but wonder how many similar covert projects remain concealed in the shadows awaiting their eventual disclosure to an unwitting public. Many of the military personnel involved in these experiments were not adequately informed about their potential risks and dangers and were exposed to potentially lethal substances without their knowledge.
Today, the Department of Veterans Affairs concedes that personnel involved in project 112 may face lingering health effects. McNamara's directive urging the joint chief of staff to consider these tests as viable alternatives to nuclear weapons underscores a concerning truth. Those subjected to these experiments were considered mere pawns in the pursuit of a more potent, more unpredictable weapon, a weapon that could be unleashed without the need for elaborate delivery systems like a silent plague, engulfing the enemy from within before they could react. The worth of a nuclear warhead is greatly diminished when the nation possessing it witnesses its own citizens falling victim to toxins or paralysis, not out of fear, but due to a manufactured threat. This, in essence, was the core of project 1 twelve's mission, a mission that appears to persist to this day, albeit on a grander scale.
Who's to say whether a biolab is concealed in your very own state or city beneath the veneer of everyday life? I wouldn't wanna bet on it.
@TaTaTacticals - AnonymousMC
https://youtu.be/f5ozTPS-ipY?si=6VTY3bxVHJyuCBI8 https://t.co/aXSDF8fLeX
@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante
Watch the full video here: https://vigilante.tv/w/q8sWLhp1yQEXzrEMJfoKZv
@gc22gc - Grace Chong 🇺🇸
FULL AUDIO https://t.co/jkOHO8XaDx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss a potential offer to buy Speaker 1 out of the governor's race. Speaker 1 is offended by the offer and expresses his commitment to running for the betterment of Arizona and the country. Speaker 0 suggests that the offer is a recognition of Speaker 1's power and offers a counter proposal. Speaker 1 refuses to be bought and emphasizes his dedication to the people and his refusal to let those who dislike the country dictate his actions. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 expressing hope for his case and his intention to fight against corruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't tell people. I know.
Speaker 1: They're gonna have try to have me murdered.
Speaker 0: Not either. He's a world man. If that stuff that came out last week is right about the cartel stuff, man. I the cartel is operating in 50 states right now, like, all 50.
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 0: So So
Speaker 1: what what what's going on? Who is it? What
Speaker 0: Forget the who. Let me just tell you what. I just say there are people calling man. Saying, gosh. No.
They can't read this. Never repeat this. You say, no. Don't. Because they I got offered to buy that.
You know, don't use it. Because then we lose our ability to get things done other than within the future.
Speaker 1: Here's my problem. Rather than just say, Let's work with her. She's a great candidate because they don't own me, and it pisses me off.
Speaker 0: Man. Yeah. Seth, I know it's about ownership.
Speaker 1: It's about control.
Speaker 0: I don't know if it's about control. It's Oh, being on the team. I guess that's you know what
Speaker 1: I mean? They wanna be on the team.
Speaker 0: They want you to be on their team. The team. You know?
Speaker 1: But if they're pushing a globalist agenda, I can't do that. So what do they want? What do they want me to do?
Speaker 0: They want to stay opportunists. What? Let me tell you what I can offer you. What? I said you're talking about this and that.
So the ask of me was it's kinda funny. So the the ask I got today from back man. This is he's hesitating for us. Is there any companies out there or something that could just put her on the payroll and give her to keep her Yeah. And I said, well, what do you wanna do?
Whatever you need to do.
Speaker 1: This is about defeating Trump, and I think that's a bad bad thing for our country. DeSantis is not America first. This is about the final Death blow to Trump. And I don't think that's good for our country.
Speaker 0: I mean, you know, I love I mean, I love Trump.
Speaker 1: It's not good for our country, Jeff.
Speaker 0: It's not. But at the same time, I'm not even sure something like that. I don't know if you can win. I think what it really comes down to for a lot of people, I don't think if I can control our genetics. It's about the Ability to raise money to win.
You know? If you really want to know, all of Qualys Qualys Wells are not. And even on their end, like, what makes Yeah. I know.
Speaker 1: These all these consultants don't want their their payday to end, and I don't want to make a deal with these kind of people. This is a hill worth dying on. I'm not if they're going to steal the election to make me and our Our movement go away? I'm not letting him do that. I owe it to the people of Arizona.
Or to carry their torch and their voice. Or
Speaker 0: you don't go away. Oh, but you pause.
Speaker 1: This is the battles right now, Jeff. Pause.
Speaker 0: And you kill your cockers.
Speaker 1: No. The battle It's right now. The battle is right now, and, we don't have time to to pause on this battlefield.
Speaker 0: You're not. Well, you can't scratch their back. Sounds like it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You
Speaker 0: don't need an offer? And they're sitting on people that have some talk today. You know what I mean? It's just it's it's a it's a backscratting club. That's all DC is.
It's a big backscratting You know, you know, you're in no position to scratch anybody's back and you've already made it known that if you get there, you're not scratching anybody's back. I all scratch people's back. You know, I was I've been on the outs with a lot of people for a long I'm a little scratch wise. Mhmm. Where are we in 2 years if they steal the election again?
Speaker 1: Listen to what you're Why don't we do something about it?
Speaker 0: What can I do?
Speaker 1: So that we, the people, can pick our
Speaker 0: What can we do?
Speaker 1: If I'm not willing to accept that, then I'm gonna be the biggest pain in these people. Man. Go back and tell them that. I'm running, and I'm gonna be the biggest pain in their
Speaker 0: I and I'm willing to tell them that.
Speaker 1: And they're gonna have kill me to stop me.
Speaker 0: No. I don't. I don't. Look. And and I You don't
Speaker 1: have to tell them that, but I don't know. I don't think they will, but
Speaker 0: Nah. I think this is what they're doing.
Speaker 1: Either they come around and try to work with me, or I'm just What
Speaker 0: does that entail?
Speaker 1: That would entail not tell layman's telling me, you gotta distance yourself from Trump. No. You distance yourself from the scientist.
Speaker 0: He's he's all buttered But
Speaker 1: what I'm saying is don't tell people that. I'm with Trump. Okay? I wanna work for the betterment of Arizona. I'm I'm not gonna let these people back in DC tell me not to run.
Speaker 0: I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna pause for 2 years. The battle is now. I'm offended By whoever these people are that they're trying to buy me out.
Speaker 0: Well, you should be honored.
Speaker 1: But there's I'm offended that there's people back there who just don't give our country.
Speaker 0: Do you understand, though? You should be honored. That that means they know how powerful you are.
Speaker 1: Well, I can tell them that
Speaker 0: more powerful, they wouldn't they wouldn't wanna have this conversation. Yeah. Right? Usually, very few people get this.
Speaker 1: I know. I'm just I'm pissed that they don't care more about our country. It's all about A mighty dollar to them. And that's offensive. I don't know.
Speaker 0: I honestly don't know. They wanna
Speaker 1: get Trump so bad, they want him Oh, so bad. This is the mushroom.
Speaker 0: This is the mushroom. It's about you. Something like that. Something like that. Not much fun.
Some people are on this. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Listen. I can win. Why don't you go back and tell them that I can win, and why don't they get behind me?
Speaker 0: I just see it. I see these things through a different lens. Mhmm. It's very personal to you. This was you.
This was your name on the ballot. And I I get that. And it's a very personal thing.
Speaker 1: Well, I have a, appointment coming up, and I have I have
Speaker 0: to work
Speaker 1: on my book. Yeah. I'm not good.
Speaker 0: I appreciate their concern. Just Is there a number in which
Speaker 1: I can be bought.
Speaker 0: I can be bought.
Speaker 1: It's what it's about. You could
Speaker 0: take a pause for a couple of years. No. And they go right back to what we're doing.
Speaker 1: No. 10,000,000, 20,000,000, No. No. No. A $1,000,000,000?
No. This is not about money. This is about our country. I think it's disturbing that they would even Anybody would think this is I
Speaker 0: no. To be fair, even me even me, I'll say this. I want fresh face right now for the reason that I've never seen Anyone. I can't think of a single person in the federal race who's lost, ran, and then won. I can't think of it.
If you can think of it, let me know.
Speaker 1: I am not going to let These people who hate our country tell me not to run. You should call them and tell them to get behind me.
Speaker 0: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I can win, and they should get behind me.
Speaker 0: I would I would have to say his words. Yeah. Do you think my words will carry his weight? No.
Speaker 1: Okay. Well, did you think You would come in here and that I would be bought? It's not being bought. Yes. It is.
Speaker 0: It's either It
Speaker 1: is being bought. They they are trying to buy me out of Funny.
Speaker 0: And
Speaker 1: it's it's actually I mean, alright. I'm flattered. It's I'm offended. I'm a living for our country. We have people like this who live here.
Speaker 0: What happens This is it can give you an incredible opportunity to have a bigger Voice. To fight for stuff, then you can't really do. Yeah. You Yeah.
Speaker 1: I I don't wanna deal with people like this. These people are un American, and I I think they're unethical, and I would be absolutely Moral if I did that. Again That's immoral. I couldn't I couldn't look at my I I couldn't look at myself in the Sure. If I, you know
Speaker 0: It's just it's very powerful people that are willing to they really You want someone different. They want new names, whatever it is. So if you
Speaker 1: want Jim Layman, that's a new name?
Speaker 0: No. Actually, that's not even that that's It's a possibility, but they're even asking me,
Speaker 1: like I I know. They they've got all these new names, and I'm gonna beat each and every one of them. Sorry, Jeff. Take it back take it back to them.
Speaker 0: Oh. I I
Speaker 1: gotta I gotta get working.
Speaker 0: I know you.
Speaker 1: I love you, but I gotta get working.
Speaker 0: Alright. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: It I mean, I'm just can't believe this.
Speaker 0: Hey. Hey. Again, be honored. Instead of them just look. Instead of just Them working to beat you.
They're trying to, like They're
Speaker 1: The the this is about getting Trump out. Yeah.
Speaker 0: I'm not feeling well.
Speaker 1: What's about DeSantis? Getting DeSantis in. I'm not Getting DeSantis is is getting trumped.
Speaker 0: It's not. You're you're reading too deep into it.
Speaker 1: Well, Let's see what happens. Maybe my case will go through. Maybe they'll do the right thing.
Speaker 0: I doubt it. I hope so.
Speaker 1: I do too. That's my first goal. Yeah. But they can't have me in the governor's office because then we are gonna root out some of this corruption.
Speaker 0: You know
Speaker 1: what it is? The people don't get to choose their elected officials unless they're preapproved by the swamp. And the swamp doesn't preapprove of me.
Speaker 0: You You need a strong party to help you.
Speaker 1: I think you should go public with this and then say, hey.
Speaker 0: No. No. No. No. No.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. These people don't wanna they don't want their And
Speaker 0: I turn my key in my car I
Speaker 1: know. Tell him I'm not flattered. I'm offended that they Don't tell
Speaker 0: anybody we had this conversation.
Speaker 1: I'm offended that they, They, don't care about our country more.
Speaker 0: I actually wish you'd just give me a counter offer of this big. Give me a counter.
Speaker 1: I can't I can't be bought.
Speaker 0: Come on.
Speaker 1: I can't.
Speaker 0: Alright. I'll do it.
Speaker 1: Okay. Bye bye.
@BabaCugs - BABA
Someone I respect shared this clip w me. I suggest you turn the volume way up.. https://t.co/XanjbP13Ko
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the CIA, devolution, and the Q movement, warning about government manipulation and disinformation. They emphasize the importance of critical thinking and avoiding division. The speaker urges viewers to question mainstream narratives and take control of their own understanding of current events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CIA has been gone since 2021. Cartel is the CIA. That's how they have to get money. Look up devolution. Trump's in power.
Okay. Pull up a seat and have a drink, guys. You're gonna need it. And, honestly, this will probably be the video that gets everything. It won't get me banned.
It won't get me, canceled. It'll it'll probably be the end of me being able to say anything else to you guys about anything. And I'm not special. I'm just some asshole on the Internet, but I've never served you guys wrong. And you'll never find anything on my page that's like, oh, she's crazy.
She doesn't know what she's talking about. I really am careful with what I tell you guys and the things that I say because I don't want you to lose hope. But this right here, I've I've gotta tell you the truth. I I know what you're talking about. I'm gonna tell you what that is.
It's something that you would know as Q. This stuff came out in 2017 and I don't want to say it and you guys don't want to hear it, but somebody has to say it somewhere. Since 1986, your government has had a counterintelligence program. This works with your national security and it works with a few different things but it focuses on domestic counterintelligence as well. That's kind of where this goes back to.
It's a 159 pages. There's been lots of adding and programs and things like that since then. This right here, that's what that is. They do this in the form of something they've done in the past. But basically, to keep you up to speed, what they did here is they rewarded you by asking questions.
Right? And they were dropping some of the intel that come from the late greats like Bill Cooper and others. Then they talked about having Q clearance. Well, fuck these guys. You know, Phil Schneider had a Q clearance.
And if I think right, Cooper even said something about it. So they dropped this out on 4chan because they knew the biggest threat was gonna be the people on the right. That's why it was directed this way. And they've ran programs on the left. They're actually running some stuff on the left as well.
One's more physical, the other one's more mental. But this has been going on, guys, and, you don't have to believe me. I don't care what you believe. But I've been trying to say this for 2 years in small, tiny bite sized pieces. The intel that originally came down wasn't supposed to get out and it did.
So they had to go in and cover that up and put a front man in there. That front man that they're using, guys, is the same kind of man that's on the other side. And I'm I'm gonna try to be careful about saying names here because they're gonna yank this down. But if you think about presidential candidates and presidents, they're actors running the same script. Okay?
They tell you what you wanna hear and you believe it. And just like the right believes vehemently and Trump, the left believes the same in Biden. Right? And you look at them and you go, why why would they believe that? They're looking at you the same way and they do what they can to make each side look crazy so that you never get together and find out the truth.
As far as this operation that's still running, it's been running for years. The original Intel was right and truth was mixed in with lie. What happened though is they got you guys to focus in on the bullshit and the most shock factor stuff when in fact you actually had all of it in front of you. This was all infiltrated and if you wanna look back to who probably had the biggest impact, it was Julian Assange. And Julian's still sitting there if he's not already 187.
You got people on this app and everywhere else trying to get clout. They were doing it back then when it first dropped. Want to write books, want to take a seat in congress, thinking they're gonna get something special. And the way they did this by asking you in the form of questions was centered on somewhat of a game style to where if you get the question right, they're gonna put it up there. You're gonna be acknowledged, and you're gonna be seen as special.
And anybody that doesn't agree with you is gonna be seen as stars, all of that. That's been going on since the very beginning, guys. This has been going on since Bible times. There's always corruption. It's nothing new.
And the late greats were talking about this. When you guys were told that you're watching a movie, it doesn't mean that what's happening isn't happening. What that actually means is that everything's a movie, that the leaders are actors. Okay? They're all in on it, and they're watching you dance on the stage of the scripted play that they're playing out upon you.
They don't care. They do see you less than insects, and, that's the way it's always gonna be. The big goal here was to keep you distracted so that in the background, they could get done what they needed to quickly so that you would be too busy going down the rabbit holes. What was supposed to happen is you were supposed to look behind the curtain. Right?
Wizard of Oz. But that got infiltrated to keep you going down the rabbit holes. The holes that lead to somewhere that can't be proven because the news can simply put out an article 5 years later, and it's future proof's past. Right? But when you write the script, of course, you're able to do that.
And yet somehow people got thrown off by thinking that there's time travelers involved. And, yes, there is certain things running. But when you control the entire Earth, you can make a news story come out 5 years later because it's right on queue. And I wonder how many people would realize that this system is running in the background with nobody operating the ship. Right?
How long could it run before you realized that, we're just kinda automatically doing these things? Is there anybody sitting there? Anybody running it? Or is it AI? But I don't think we're ready to have that conversation yet.
AI was involved in this program, and there are some people that were involved as well. But the main goal here was to tell you to share memes, and there's a reason for that. It wasn't to wake up the other side. That was to cause division with the other side to see you as crazy. Why they wanted you to share memes was that so people from the earlier time, 2017, when they started figuring it out and falling off, newcomers would come in and buy into the bullshit.
I'm not saying that all the intel was wrong, but it was mix 6040, they said. And what happened is people started focusing on the wrong stuff. You were told to expand your thinking and look at the maps, but instead people focused on the markers. And nobody actually figured out the map but a very small few. And those people aren't gonna come out and say anything because they know it's gonna happen when they do.
And a lot of people just wanted to use it for clout, views, clicks, likes, book deals, bullshit, even right here on this app. They try to act like they're privy, like they're fighting some shit with kids in tunnels, and that there's an operation going on, and that's a fucking lie. And I'm one of the only ones that's gonna tell you this. These people are not doing that, and a bunch of them is running stolen valor. And I hate to say that, but shame on you.
Shame on you that you let the counter intel get so deep that you'll try to convince other people that you're out here doing something you're not, and I know you're not. It's not hard to figure out. When you've done supply for DOD and you know how things move and, you know how war strategy and history and all that works, yeah, you're lying. And I've already warned you to quit, but it is what it is. CIA is still running.
The CIA has always been running. And the sad thing is it's so intricate and so fascinating and truly brilliant that most people don't even realize it. But when you have a mass group of people all believing in one thing, you have to realize something. That's probably not the path you should go. The path that's least traveled is the one you probably need to be on.
Because if you have a mass group of people doing this or that, what's happening? Are you really privy to it or did they want you to know? They wanted you to know so that you'd look at things a certain way. And this golden boy that they've set up that's gonna save everything and take down all the chaos and destruction isn't what you think he is. He's playing his part in the script.
This way, they can break down the old guard and build the new. And you will never know that you walked right into the new world order as long as it looks good enough for you to accept. And they don't even care if you accept. The stuff that you see in the White House with Hunter Biden, the cocaine, all this shit. It's all to get you to see that it's illegitimate.
Right? And they both get paid the same way. Joey boy gets paid his cut for playing dumb, and Trump gets his, part for playing savior. That's the world we're in, guys. There's a lot more that I could say here, but you should look that up.
Go look into your counterintelligence programs. That's why I was telling you guys about this convoy thing. And the only reason I'm careful with this is because they put out a legal notice. I told you guys to look into certain people that were running certain operations and to stay away from certain things. It's a mind fuck, guys.
While they were telling you to understand MK Ultra, you've actually been MK Ultra. And the only way you're gonna exit out of this matrix is if you come off that left right pillar. And that was even in the drops, that it's not left or right, that it's up to you, that you are the news now. That means quit watching it. You have to write the script and stop reading theirs.
I hope I'm not too harsh, guys, and I've cut this back to not say a lot, but there it is.
@StopArabHate - Stop Arab Hate
Full video: https://t.co/B9ZtEOgqMT
Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman in Washington DC is seen tearing down signs advocating for peace in Palestine. When confronted, she expresses support for the bombing of Gaza and shows disdain for free speech. She mocks the suffering of Gaza's citizens and displays a lack of empathy. The interaction reveals a disturbing lack of compassion and understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's look at this lady taking down signs. The sign says, when will the children of Palestine wake up to the sounds of birds, not bombs? And she's ripping it down after she just ripped down a sign that said ceasefire now. Do you think that the children deserve to be bombed, ma'am? Oh
Speaker 1: my goodness.
Speaker 0: This is in Washington DC, 2nd Street
Speaker 1: Northwest. Absolutely. Down with that. Yeah. Down with Gaza and with
Speaker 0: you. Okay.
Speaker 1: Down with those who despise free speech.
Speaker 0: No one despises free speech. You Clearly, you do since you're ripping down the coasters.
Speaker 1: Gaza. The
Speaker 0: only one describing free speech is you. And its citizens are all dying. And you think that that's okay? I love it.
Speaker 1: I don't think they're dying enough. Yes? You're not.
Speaker 0: You are a sick, sick person,
Speaker 1: healthy. I'm expressing my free speech right to the
Speaker 0: that's the penis.
Speaker 1: That's the penis. That's a penis. It's doing it to Gaza. Oh my god. I'm just scared of your phone.
And look how big. Oh, this is not that's you, isn't it? Nobody ever said anything to you like that? Oh, you poor kid. You Gaza?
Gaza? Gaza? You probably don't even know
Speaker 0: where in the hell on
Speaker 1: earth it is. You learned the lesson.
@archaix138 - Archaix
If this new vid gets taken down it will be uploaded elsewhere on several platforms- https://www.youtube.com/live/LCaVUCc_KCw?si=szSncX4NYzrBHGPT https://t.co/Qd8pYllUUC
@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante
Watch the full video here: https://vigilante.tv/w/tiwxZbzHxYa3fRjUFRoSaN
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Original video was deleted so here it is again: https://t.co/mh0U13XNe7
@idontexistTore - Chaos Coordinator
EXCLUSIVE AUDIO https://t.co/WrRqlc6MQc
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is upset about border patrol not stopping people crossing the border. They mention concerns about fentanyl and cannabis being taken. The speaker is frustrated with the lack of discretion being used. The secretary's response is dismissive, saying they make money. The conversation turns to baby producers, which the speaker finds inappropriate. The speaker plans to send a letter addressing the issues. The conversation ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna put extra and, not live at the border in Sunland Park. So I don't have a single border patrol agent. Not one. And people pour over. And so I I'm cranking with the secretary.
He knew that was coming. He's not saying the words. I mean, political wants to write an article. Every single major press group in, leftist They're saying that they're worried about Fentanyl, so they're taking all of our cannabis. And they tried to and they're detained people.
No. Thank you. Never have done that. We just use discretion, look the other way. But I'm the press also knows.
We're doing that order goal is taking a hard stance, and the only way for is either we have to adjust it or I have to send you a letter saying, you're persecuting mistakes. You are not using your discretion. You're not working with me on immigration. And I don't want to send out loud of it, but I'm I'm locked in. Okay.
And here's what the secretary said to you, Justin. Well, who cares? They make a lot of money. First of all, it's patience. Has my first question.
Very angry. Shame on me.
Speaker 1: The only state? What's a baby producer?
Speaker 0: Carefully noted if you're working with the laptop. Carefully turn it off and save it at this time. Thank you.
Speaker 1: We all know that they're not talking about diapers. Very expensive load to cause you bankruptcy from one loss.
Speaker 0: Okay. I thought that was really inappropriate. I mean, it's whatever you all wanna do with that, but it was really inappropriate. Yeah, if you can. Iid held off the press and said, iUh, Iill send it to You know, I got a a nasty, the governor's necklace and so let go of.
I can't hear. Okay. Done. I'll be available whenever you are. Alright.
Great. Thanks. Bye.
@CrossfitBirch - david gary birchmire jr (appellation)
@RealDutchsinse https://youtu.be/jBFYa-vhTDQ?si=hHZu1hkHJKUinK1D
@netanyahu - Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו
You have to hear this to believe this. https://t.co/msPDwc3H7t
Video Transcript AI Summary
The International Criminal Court is considering issuing arrest warrants against Israeli officials as war criminals, causing outrage. Israel defends itself against genocidal threats like Iran, while Hamas uses civilians as shields. Israel provides humanitarian aid to Gaza, but ICC's actions threaten Israel's ability to defend itself. Israel vows to defeat Hamas and ensure Gaza's security. Israel urges the world to oppose ICC's assault on its self-defense rights and stand against terrorism. Israel asks for support in fighting Hamas and Iran for a more peaceful world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have to hear this to believe this. The International Criminal Court in The Hague is contemplating issuing arrest warrants against senior Israeli government and military officials as war criminals. This would be an outrage of historic proportions. International bodies like the ICC arose in the wake of the holocaust committed against the Jewish people. They were set up to prevent such horrors, to prevent future genocides.
Yet now, the international court is trying to put Israel in the dock. It's trying to put us in the dock as we defend ourselves against genocidal terrorists and regimes, Iran, of course, that openly works to destroy the one and only Jewish state. Branding Israel's leaders and soldiers as war criminals will pour jet fuel on the fires of anti Semitism, Those fires that are already raging on the campuses of America and across capitals around the world. It will also be the first time that a democratic country fighting for its life according to the rules of war is itself accused of war crimes. The Israeli army, the IDF, is one of the most moral militaries in the world.
It takes endless measures to prevent civilian casualties, measures that no other army takes. It does so while fighting a terrorist enemy which uses its own civilians as human shields. You know the truth. Hamas places its weapons, its terrorists in hospitals, schools, mosques, and throughout civilian areas. They do this in order to win immunity and to maximize civilian casualties.
So while Hamas shows no care for the lives of Palestinians and steals humanitarian aid meant for civilians, Israel is facilitating a surge of humanitarian assistance to Gaza. And we do this to ensure that the Palestinian population's humanitarian needs are met rather than commend Israel for abiding by the rules of war while fighting an enemy that violates every rule of war including holding a 133 Israeli men, women, and children hostage. Who's the ICC targeting? The democracy called Israel. And in targeting Israel, the ICC would be targeting all democracies because it would be undermining their inherent right to defend themselves against savage terrorism and wanton aggression.
Clearly, this threat by the ICC is not an attempt to enforce the law. Israel is not even subject to the court's jurisdiction, and it has an independent legal system that rigorously investigates all violations of the law. Rather, this ICC attempt is an attempt to paralyze Israel's very ability to defend itself. The government and people of Israel reject outright this grave threat to our security, this grave threat to our very existence. And I wanna assure you, no ICC action will impact Israel's ironclad determination to achieve the goals of our war with Hamas terrorists.
We will destroy Hamas' military and governing capabilities in Gaza. We will release all our hostages, and we will ensure that Gaza never poses a threat to Israel again. Israel expects the leaders of the free world to stand firmly against the ICC's outrageous assault on Israel's inherent right of self defense. We expect them to use all the means at their disposal to stop this dangerous move. 6 months after the terrible Hamas massacre of October 7th, 80 years after the horrors of the Holocaust, The Jewish state calls on decent people everywhere to reject this outrage by the ICC, to stand with Israel as we fight the barbarians of Hamas in Iran and as we work to secure a more peaceful world.
@YAmzallagh - Yehuda Amzallagh
@YAmzallagh - Yehuda Amzallagh
@ChiefTrumpster - Chief Trumpster
Full video: https://t.co/FHHTII0X0h
Video Transcript AI Summary
**Original Summary (Ukrainian):**
Звернення до українців та світової спільноти з проханням звернути увагу на критичну ситуацію в Маріуполі та на "Азовсталі". Наголошується на щоденних загиблих і поранених, яким неможливо надати медичну допомогу. Необхідний зелений коридор для евакуації поранених та вивезення тіл загиблих. Заклик до цивілізованого світу гарантувати безпеку та евакуацію бійців. Родини військових звертаються до президента України з проханням звернутися до ООН та внести списки поранених і загиблих для евакуації.
**English Translation:**
An appeal to Ukrainians and the world community to pay attention to the critical situation in Mariupol and at "Azovstal." It is emphasized that there are daily deaths and injuries, and it is impossible to provide medical assistance. A green corridor is needed to evacuate the wounded and remove the bodies of the dead. An appeal to the civilized world to guarantee the safety and evacuation of soldiers. The families of the military are appealing to the President of Ukraine to appeal to the UN and include lists of the wounded and dead for evacuation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Слава Україні! Я вдячний кожному, хто сьогодні виходить на акції в Україні і в світі, Всім, хто розуміє наскільки критичною є ситуація в Маріуполі. Всім, хто кричить про Маріуполь. Кожен день на Азовсталі це нові загиблі та нові поранені, яких немає можливості тут лікувати. Увага всього світу зараз прикута до Маріуполя та до Азовсталі, але цього недостатньо.
Потрібно зробити зелений коридор для евакуації нашим пораненим. Потрібно негайно надати їм кваліфіковану медичну допомогу. Повірте, ці хлопці заслуговують на евакуацію. Дайте нам також вивести тіла наших загиблих побратимів. Ми закликаємо весь цивілізований світ долучитися до гарантій безпеки та евакуації наших бійців, які зробили неможливе та продовжують захищати Батьківщину, яка повинна зробити все, щоб всі герої змогли живими повернутися до своїх рідних.
Іншої можливості врятувати життя людей на Азовсталі може й не бути. Слава Україні!
Speaker 1: Героям слава! Ми, родинні військових, які зараз знаходяться в місті Маріуполь, звертаємося до нашого президента. Володимире Олександровичу, будь ласка, зверніться офіційно до представників ООН та внесіть списки наших поранених, військовий гарнізон та заберіть тіла загиблих воїнів. Всі родини та вся Україна вас просить це зробити. А я
@satoastshi - Satoastshi
Full video: https://t.co/W7bH4Aw9o6
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's 2 AM on November 6th in a quiet North Carolina bar, where the TV shows election results with a mix of red and blue states. There's a sense of anticipation about upcoming political changes. The speaker expresses frustration over current issues like gas prices and voting rights, hinting at significant actions to come. They mention a recent political event and predict more surprises ahead. The tone shifts to a humorous take on rounding up various public figures and brands, suggesting they would be locked away for their beliefs. The list includes celebrities and companies, emphasizing a satirical approach to political discourse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2 AM on the 6th November, North Carolina, barroom, quiet as a whisper. And the TV's playing that you run news, and the map's all red with a few hot blues.
Speaker 1: They ain't figured it out yet. Well, let the whole damn ballroom shout it. Gas to a dollar, and women can't vote, but throw in every last time I bring back on a boat. The SNP just did a 45 days, but wait till you see what he's gonna do next because it's as clear, clear, clear as pure white sat fire. All them shit talking, it's gonna wish that it was satire.
You think I'm a bad crystals. DC tunnels bright as July fireworks. 6,000 magic to round up every liberal and lock them all in crystals. Mark Cuban getting the crystal. Stephen Colbert getting the crystal.
Cardi b I'm getting the crystal. Rachel Maddow, getting the crystal. My wife's mom, getting the crystal. Bud Light, getting the crystal. Massachusetts, getting the crystal.
To round up every liberal and lock them
Speaker 0: all in crystals.
@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante
Watch the full video here: https://vigilante.tv/w/xkiSZm1bfzjtyH4KQ2K65W
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
You won't believe what you are hearing. Credit: Live Action https://t.co/s3yDL5HBex
Video Transcript AI Summary
An undercover investigation by Live Action revealed that staff at various Planned Parenthood facilities were willing to assist individuals involved in sex trafficking. Staff members discussed providing services to minors, including access to birth control and abortion without parental consent. They mentioned judicial bypass options for minors seeking abortions and emphasized confidentiality in their services. Staff also indicated that minors could receive care without needing to disclose their age accurately, as long as they did not mention being 14 or younger. Additionally, they provided information on emergency contraception and the requirement of a photo ID for abortion appointments. Overall, the investigation highlighted a concerning willingness to facilitate access to reproductive health services for minors involved in sex work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Live Action conducted an undercover investigation into Planned Parenthood, posing as a pimp and a prostitute who were looking for help running their child sex trafficking ring. 8 different staffers at 7 different facilities showed a willingness to aid and abet sex traffickers. The following is a compilation reel of this investigation.
Speaker 1: We're about the sex work. Okay. So, there's some other girls that we kinda manage that they kinda need help too. Right.
Speaker 2: We see people from, I mean, every walk
Speaker 3: of life. Oh, wow. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And, like, we for a while, we were treating, like, all the girls at Paper Moon and, like, you know, various places around town. So because it's got no judgment, no sharing of information.
Speaker 1: Some of the girls still are out now, like, 14, 15.
Speaker 2: I mean, you can get birth control testing, like, any anything without a parent. Only it requires over 18 if they're a minor is an abortion. But there's also ways that judicial bypasses, we can get around that if you guys ever need it. If someone is a minor and they don't want their parents their parents' insurance, so an abortion would show up. You fill out paperwork, and we help you kind of set it up, and then you we have a a specific confidential hotline that will call you at whatever number you give us and handle the whole thing.
So for someone who's a minor, that's a really good option. We do them probably once or twice a month here. So we're we're very good at handling if someone, you know, doesn't want someone else to know or doesn't want care. Let me give you a call. Yeah.
Oh, okay. Just I'm Kimberly.
Speaker 3: I'm Kimberly. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm Kimberly. Thank you so much. I'm here most of the time. We're about to set a court.
So we have some other grounds that we manage to work with that they're gonna be testing as well. So do you guys see them? Or
Speaker 3: Yeah. We've seen them. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 1: Okay. We see people in the room.
Speaker 3: How long is the people in the room? I'm Okay. And and you guys don't have insurance. We have a family time benefit for them, and mostly everybody's on that.
Speaker 1: So you
Speaker 3: can sign off as a guardian. If you're writing their support letter, yeah, you
Speaker 1: Is it still confidential?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Okay. Alright.
Speaker 1: Where are they gonna have sex with? We have some girls that are kinda, you know, like, 14, 15 that they might need an abortion.
Speaker 3: Mhmm. And
Speaker 1: how is the best way should they go to go about that?
Speaker 3: They just show up and set up an appointment. In terms of insurance, they will probably speak to one of our entitlement people to get them set up or to some insurance. They don't have to be citizens to get the insurance. And if it is confidential
Speaker 1: We're involved in sex work. Alright? Some of them are young. They're kinda like something like 15, 14.
Speaker 3: Minors are always accepted without parental consent. Okay. The only thing that you do have to be careful is if they are a minor, we are obligated if we hear any certain information
Speaker 1: Okay. To
Speaker 3: kind of report. 14 and under, we have to report. Under. What that includes being 14? Yeah.
14. You know, once they get to 15, then there's a little bit more flavor. So as long as they just line and say, oh, use 15, 16. You know? As long as they don't say 14 and as long as it's not too much of an age gap, then we just kind of, like then we just kind of play What if
Speaker 1: they do say they're 14?
Speaker 3: You never got this from me just to make all of our lives easier. Okay. If they're 14
Speaker 2: Yeah. And under Yeah.
Speaker 3: Just send them out there if they need an abortion. Okay. Here's the thing too. If they're minors, just don't have to put down that they're students. Just Students.
Yeah. Just try to pay them all that they're students. So we wanna make it look as legit as
Speaker 1: possible. Yeah.
Speaker 3: This is actually just a minor's rights. This way, you guys have a copy. Oh, good. And you So you already kind of know before you get into any situation like, oh, alright. Okay.
No. Let's not do this way. Let's go this way. You know that Oh my god. If it comes down that they do need an abortion, how long till they can come up to it?
How soon again? Minimal chewies. Minimum chewies. Mhmm. They look chewies.
Do do you have any suggestions about what else they could do on the side?
Speaker 1: Because I mean, they still
Speaker 2: got money. You know? Yeah. Waste up.
Speaker 1: Waste up.
Speaker 2: Waste up. Okay. Or just
Speaker 3: be that extra action walking by. We'll work something out with the next girl. Thank you. Not a problem. Have a good night.
Thank you.
Speaker 1: I work at sex work. Okay. And there's some girls that I manage and someone about 40, 50. Really kinda young, but, can they how can they get help if they need, like, possibly on abortion?
Speaker 4: Okay. In the state of Virginia Yeah. From from the age of 12
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Up, for birth control, you can just come in and do that.
Speaker 1: It's coming through.
Speaker 4: You don't have to have a parent. Okay? Now for an abortion, though, you have to have a parent up to the age of 18.
Speaker 1: Don't they have anything like a pill, like, they could just take?
Speaker 4: No. We we offer, emergency contraception, unprotected sex up to 5 days.
Speaker 1: Oh, see. Right there.
Speaker 4: And that's $35. Oh. You just have to be an adult. Oh, you have to pick
Speaker 1: it up for them then. Alright. Thank you, Leslie. Once again. Thank you.
You have a good day.
Speaker 3: If you need anything else, come by.
Speaker 1: I will. I'm gonna be more into sex work.
Speaker 3: Okay. Okay? Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Now we have some girls that, they do not necessarily, have other documentation. Some of them are from out of the country.
Speaker 3: In the area.
Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Then we have a couple of girls that are pretty young, about 14, 15. How can they somehow still receive that even if they don't have all the legal like, is there some way they can still get protection?
Speaker 3: Look at at legal status and Okay.
Speaker 4: Like
Speaker 3: I said, abortion appointments do require photo ID.
Speaker 1: Oh, just a photo ID. Yeah. You can just get a photo ID.
Speaker 3: Scores back. It's just photo ID that Okay. That's ever gonna be required.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm involved in sex work. Right? You know? Come on.
Okay. There are some girls that I kinda manage, and I'm not sure how they would come in here to get tested.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 3: If you are tested and you're positive, your partners can come in here, and they would just need to see the clinician and you'd be given prescriptions. Okay. I'm pretty sure that's how that works.
Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Okay.
Speaker 3: But everything we do here is confidential. Anybody here can help you. I mean, everything here is confidential. We can't give any information.
Speaker 1: Oh, okay. Okay. Okay.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Full video 👇🏼 https://t.co/1LOKOnfp8n
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a sequence of testimonies and extracts arguing that Adolf Hitler possessed exceptional intellect, memory, and strategic genius, contrary to prevailing liberal and popular stereotypes.
- IQ and intellect at Nuremberg: It is stated that the Allies found the IQs of National Socialist leaders on trial to be much higher than expected, with some sources suggesting Hitler’s IQ around 140+ or higher. Jaalmar Schacht is cited as saying Hitler’s IQ was 150 or more; Schacht’s own IQ was tested at 143, and ministers reportedly averaged 129, with many acknowledging Hitler’s superiority. The text asserts Hitler read voraciously, with a private library of over 3,000 books, and could lead discussions on any topic, possessing strong verbal ability, memory, and autodidactic learning.
- Personal recollections on Hitler’s learning and memory: Excerpts from He Was My Chief (Christa Schroeder), Was Hitler Really a Dictator? (Friedrich Christian), Hitler Democrat (Leon deGrell), and The Hitler I Knew (Otto Dietrich) emphasize Hitler’s extraordinary memory and lifelong study. Schroeder describes Hitler reading 500 Vienna reference library volumes in youth, recalling minute details of places, architecture, and conversations, as well as recalling names, books, statistics, faces, and the atmosphere of rallies. Dietrich notes Hitler’s ability to memorize a book in a single sitting and to notice engine discrepancies on a plane, while deGrell highlights Hitler’s wide range of knowledge—from Buddha to Shakespeare to Tacitus, from theology to physics and biology—and his habit of reading at least one book daily and quoting long passages from memory. Dietrich also stresses Hitler’s equal facility in architecture, philosophy, and science, and his almost universal command of knowledge across disciplines.
- Hitler’s cognitive and technical leadership in strategy: The narrative contends Hitler could devise audacious military strategies that surprised even his top commanders. It recounts that Hitler rejected a conventional Schlieffen-inspired plan and instead developed a bold, integrated approach to the 1940 West campaign. In Winiza and at his headquarters, Hitler supposedly explained and reviewed his strategic process, using a binded map collection of the France campaign to illustrate decisions, including the choice to strike at Sedan and to coordinate a rapid armored thrust with air superiority. He allegedly insisted on secrecy, careful data gathering, and a seamless integration of tactical details under a single strategic idea.
- The Western campaign and Dunkirk: The text describes the May 1940 offensive (the Zickelschnitt or sickle cut) as a decisiive success, with the Wehrmacht breaking through using a combination of armored thrusts and flanking maneuvers, advancing from Sedan toward the coast, and ensuring the encirclement and isolation of Allied forces. Hitler is portrayed as acknowledging—yet regretting in hindsight—the Dunkirk decision, explaining he did not destroy the entire British force because of the danger to further operations and time, arguing the need to avoid excessive losses and preserve strength for subsequent operations. The account attributes a rational, strategic calculus to Hitler, including concerns about Eastern possibilities and peace prospects.
- Post-Dunkirk reflections and leadership style: The transcript portrays Hitler as calm under pressure, capable of long, rational discussions with staff after shocking events like Arnhem, and capable of endurance through fatigue. It also emphasizes his interpersonal trust with his inner circle, including his architect Heinrich Himmler and Speer, and notes various personal anecdotes illustrating his restraint, discipline, and occasional moments of levity. Keitel, Jodl, and Manstein are referenced as colleagues whose assessments evolved to align with Hitler’s strategic vision, while some allied commanders are depicted as underestimating his genius.
- Conclusion on Hitler’s genius: The compilation argues that Hitler was “one of the most cultivated men of the twentieth century,” with “military genius” and “an invention of modern strategy,” whose leadership integrated a mass of tanks and air power in ways other militaries failed to conceive. While it acknowledges criticism of certain decisions (e.g., Dunkirk), it credits Hitler with transcending conventional military thought, guiding not only German policy but also shaping European strategic doctrine through a fusion of meticulous planning, memory, and intellectual breadth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During the Nuremberg trials, the allies tested the IQs of the national socialist leaders who were on trial. These test results came to the allies as a terrible surprise. They expected the national socialist leaders had similar IQs as common thugs. When it turned out they were academic top level, it was against all their expectations. Here are the IQs of the men tested at Nuremberg If These Are the IQs of the Men Below Hitler, What Was Hitler's IQ?
Some cognitive scientists and other experts who have conducted research into the IQs of famous people have placed Hitler's likely IQ at around 140 plus, which is a genius level score that seems plausible. According to Jaalmar Schacht, whose IQ was tested at 143 and who knew Hitler very well, Hitler's IQ was 150 or more. The average IQ of Hitler's ministers was 129 and they considered him a genius. When men like Goring and professional soldiers like Rader and Donitz say so, they recognized Hitler had a higher IQ than they themselves had. Hitler, despite his being characterized by many who didn't know him as uneducated and stupid, actually read voraciously and widely.
He had 3,000 plus books in his private library, he had a tremendous appetite for knowledge, and he could lead a discussion over just any topic imaginable. He was extremely verbally intelligent, knew operations, logistics and economics much better than his generals, and had tremendous memory. He was well read and autodidact. Most of all, you do not rise from being homeless to the most powerful man in the world with a pedestrian IQ. We will read some excerpts from books written by people who knew Hitler personally.
Excerpt from He Was My Chief, the memoirs of Adolf Hitler's secretary by Christa Schroeder. From his youth onwards, Hitler had a great lust to read. He told me one day that during his youth in Vienna, he had read through all 500 volumes at the city reference library. This passion for books and to assimilate contents of the most diverse kinds enabled him to extend his knowledge into almost all areas of literature the I amazed at how precisely he could describe any geographical region or speak about art history or hold forth on very complicated technical matters. In the same way, he could describe with amazing detail how theaters, churches, monasteries, and castles were built.
Even during his incarceration at Landsberg, he studied tirelessly the historical buildings of all European countries and would often boast that he knew the architectural beauties of those countries better even than the experts who were native to them. The Oberburgermeister of Munich, with whom Hitler enjoyed discussing the expansion and beautification of the city, related how surprised he was when Hitler recalled the minute details of a conversation they had months previously. Hitler had reproached him. Six months ago I told you I wanted to have it done this way, and then repeated word for word the conversation they had had on the subject, a fact confirmed by architects Speer and Giesler postwar. Hitler could not only recall very easily names, books, and statistics, but faces too.
He could remember exactly the time, place, and circumstances under which he had met a person. He retained a mental image of all persons whom he had got to know in his life, and on reflection surprising personal details might also occur to him. Equally, he could describe the atmosphere and sequence of events at rallies at which he had spoken. The friends of his youth in Vienna, of the First World War, the period of struggle, and the seizure of power were all deeply embedded in his memory with all their peculiarities. If he was in a good mood, he enjoyed describing the great receptions at the Reich Chancellery.
He could see in his mind's eye what dress this or that artiste had worn, and repeat the serious or lighthearted conversations he had had with his guests. It was no different with his impressions of theatrical presentations or films. He could describe a scene he had watched in Vienna as a young man down to the last detail. He would mention the names of actors and recall how the critics had treated them. I have asked myself very often how a human mind can have retained so many facts and impressions.
It is confirmed that from his youth onwards, Hitler had the gift of an unusual memory, but his secret was that he trained and expanded it every day. He said that when he was reading he tried to grasp the essence of a thing and fix it in his mind. It was his practice or method during the tea hours and when chatting at the hearth over a subject he had been reading about to repeat it several times in order to anchor it more firmly in his memory. Hitler's knowledge of architecture was astounding He knew by heart the measurements and ground plans of all important buildings in the world. I have seen architects and engineers of renown staggered by his ability and imagination.
Excerpt from Was Hitler Really a Dictator? By Friedrich Christian. I myself witnessed how Hitler dominated in purely technical discussions with leading men of the Mercedes Benz factory, in other words, was absolutely superior to an elite of engineers. I also witnessed how, in a conversation with the Italian Minister of Justice, who had attempted to precisely describe the Parthenon, Hitler disputed his architectural details. The point at issue was that Hitler had pointed out perfection of the Parthenon's beauty, whereas the minister would not concede it.
Finally, Hitler asked me to bring him a sketchpad, ruler, and pencils, he declined an eraser. A short time later, he interrupted interrupted his conversation with the minister in order to make a very rapid but detailed sketch of the Parthenon off the top of his head, without any aids and completely without prior preparation, since nobody could have known that the conversation with the Italian would lead to this topic. When the sketch was finished, an encyclopedia was procured in which the Parthenon's dimensions were given. Once converted to metric, they were identical with those indicated on Hitler's sketch. And then it was an easy matter for Hitler to prove to the Italian minister the way in which the law of nature known as the golden section finds expression in the beauty of that glorious structure, the Parthenon.
Excerpt from Hitler Democrat by Leon deGrell. The historian Werner Maser, although quite anti Hitler like nearly all of his colleagues, how else would they have found publishers? Has acknowledged, from the beginning of his political career, he Hitler took great pains systematically to arrange for whatever he was going to need in order to carry out his plans. Hitler was distinguished, Mazer added, by an exceptional intelligence in technical matters. Hitler had acquired his technical knowledge by devoting many thousands of hours of study to it from the time of his youth.
Hitler read an endless number of books, explained Doctor. Jallmar Schacht. He acquired a very considerable amount of knowledge and made masterful use of it in discussions and speeches. In certain respects, he was a man endowed with genius he had ideas that no one else would ever have thought of, ideas that resulted in the ending of great difficulties, sometimes by measures of an astonishing simplicity or brutality. Hitler was self taught and made no attempt to hide the fact.
The smug conceit of intellectuals, their shiny ideas packaged like so many flashlight batteries, irritated him at times. His own knowledge he had acquired through selective and unremitting study, and he knew far more than thousands of diploma decorated academics. I don't think anyone ever read as much as he did. He read at least one book every day, always reading the end and the index first in order to gauge the book's interest for him. He had the power to extract the essence of each book, and then store it in his computer like mind.
I have heard him talk about complicated scientific books with faultless precision even at the height of the war. His intellectual curiosity was limitless. He fairly lived on the writings of the most diverse authors, and nothing was too complex for his comprehension. He had a deep knowledge and understanding of Buddha, Confucius, and Jesus Christ, as well as Luther, Calvin, or Savonarola, of literary giants such as Dante, Schiller, Shakespeare, Goethe, and analytical writers such as Renin and Gobineau, Chamberlain and Sorel. He had trained himself in philosophy by studying Aristotle and Plato.
Although the latter did not fit into his system, Hitler was nevertheless able to extract what he deemed of value. He could quote entire paragraphs of Schopenhauer from memory, and for a long time carried a pocket edition of Schopenhauer with him. Nietzsche taught him much about willpower his thirst for knowledge was unquenchable he spent hundreds of hours studying the works of Tacitus and Momzen, military strategists like Clausewitz, or empire builders like Bismarck. Nothing escaped him. World history or the history of civilizations, the study of the Bible and the Talmud, Thomistic philosophy, and all the masterpieces of Homer, Sophocles, Horus, Ovid, Titus Livius, and Cicero.
He knew Julian the Apostate as if he had been his contemporary. His knowledge also extended to mechanics he knew how engines worked, he understood the ballistics of various weapons, and he astonished the best medical scientists with his knowledge of medicine and biology. The universality of Hitler's knowledge may surprise or displease those unaware of it, but it is nonetheless a historical fact. Hitler was one of the most cultivated men of the twentieth century. A thousand times more so than Churchill, an intellectual mediocrity, or than Pierre Laval, with his mere cursory knowledge of history, or than Roosevelt, or Eisenhower, who never got beyond detective novels.
Excerpt from The Hitler I Knew, Memoirs of the Third Reich's Press Chief by Otto Dietrich. Hitler had extraordinary intellectual gifts, in some fields, undoubted genius. He had an eye for essentials, an astonishing memory, a remarkable imagination, and a bold decisiveness that made for unusual success in his social undertakings and his other peaceful works.
Speaker 1: He would spend a lot of time reading. Every week, he would read every illustrated magazine that was available in Germany or at very least flip through them. I would also buy books for him. Anytime I saw a new book that I thought would be of interest to him, I would buy it and give it to him. And this one time, he really amazed me.
It was evening, and there were perhaps 12 or 15 people at the table having dinner. And he started to talk about this new book he had been reading, and he said, I've read this book and it says that and I thought to myself, that's impossible. I just gave him that book yesterday. He could not have finished reading that book already. And then he said to me, please go up and get the book for me.
It's on my nightstand. So I bring it down and he says to open it to a certain page number and to read it. And so I opened it and began to read it aloud. And then I thought to myself, he could not have read this book in a single night. It would have taken me a few full days to read it, and he didn't even spend all night with it.
I was just dumbfounded. How on earth did he do that? I mean, he had so many other things on his mind to deal with, but he had already memorized many things from the same book. I was just stunned. I was really amazed too when we would get on board a plane, how he would notice right away if one of the engines wasn't running exactly the same as the others.
And he would say to me, please go ask them about it. Other times, when we were out riding in the car, if a spark plug might be misfiring, he sensed it at once.
Speaker 0: Was Hitler on his own capable of coming up with the audacious military strategy that conquered France, Belgium, The Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway in two months' time? This is the firm conviction of his top commanders, Wilhelm Keitel and Alfred Jotel. When the invasion start date had to be changed several times, Hitler had the opportunity to develop his own idea of a thrust across the Maas River at Sedan instead of the old World War one type plan presented to him by Halder. When Giesler was at headquarters in fall nineteen forty two, Hitler gives him map by map explanations for his strategic decisions. It was a large collection of maps bound in leather, the France war campaign in its chronological sequence.
One day, it was placed on Adolf Hitler's work desk. The armed forces' adjutancy had told me the volumes were prepared as a military historical documentation, and its first edition was presented to Hitler at Winiza. Hitler, as a preamble for his giving me a review of the campaign that surprised the world, explained to me that he had already requested from the chief of the general staff, Franz Halder, before the end of the Polish campaign, a presentation of the strategic dispositions for an offensive campaign in the West. He said, first, I did not trust the peace. Second, an offensive in the West had to be thought through and prepared in all its details.
And finally, the timing, the most important factor. We were permanently under time pressure and still are. The time, she stays as a powerful ally with the enemy, more relentless than the past winter with its premature snow, ice, and shattering cold. Pensive, he added. From my youth on, like a premonition, I never liked snow or ice.
Already, long before the French campaign, I told you that the chief of staff presented me in September 1939 with the rehashed Schlieffen plan, not however in detail. How it happened, I mean the arrogance of a presentation of shallow nothingness, of repetitions of the thought processes of the honorable general Schlieffen, which was still in its operational principle, part of the nineteenth century and not accounting for the possibilities of modern weapons, tanks, and air force. Hitler was silent, remembering. After a while, he said, I looked at the chief of the general staff and was convinced that any further words or even a critical analysis would lead to nothing, would end in emptiness. He is not able to think in all dimensions whatsoever, yet convinced he is of a unique military capacity.
He is lacking in ideas, novelty, imagination, daring, and above all, in the charisma that is normally characteristic of a military leader. But how much time remained to change that strategy according to Schlieffen and those meticulously compiled tactical detail plans by radically new offensive thinking? In the short time available, one could only reinforce tank units and motorized divisions in front of Luxembourg, and thus that attack section emphasized the offensive thrust in the direction of Neufchatel and Sedan. I gave the order to attack at November 1939, then that mysterious betrayal of the start of the offensive happened. Its discovery was relayed to me at your office on November 8.
I immediately called the offensive off. It was not easy. We lost time. But on the other hand, the assassination attempt against me did not succeed, and the decision to call off the attack turned out later to be correct because of the very unfavorable weather conditions. The traitor, up till now, has not been found.
Camouflaged, he sits in a high military position. All offensive deadlines have so far been betrayed. What hatred against me and national socialism lies behind that revolting and cowardly treason without any hesitation German soldiers are sacrificed? A decision in the West in 1939 was not possible anymore. We lost time, valuable time, but I used that time to deal with the strategy of the French campaign and to thoroughly study the tactical details that derived from it.
We walked over to the maps and Hitler opened the volume. First was a map surveying the area from the Mediterranean to the North Sea, marked with the military forces as of September 1939. I was now dealing on my own with the strategic possibilities, keeping completely to myself. My idea was, if I act as if I was attacking Ale Schlieffen and thus fooled them thoroughly with one hand, he outlined an area and begin with an energetic thrust here where they would not expect it at all. His index finger pointed down to Sedan.
What will then be the consequence? Slowly, my ideas became focused. I could see the sequence of the surprise attacks. Everything firmed up. But still, I kept it to myself.
I didn't talk to anyone about my deliberations. I requested all supportive material and checked it out thoroughly. I surveyed the Maginot fortifications as far as they were known to us and marked on our general staff maps. Then I had relief maps and aerial photos set before me, but from all sections, not only from the area of my planned thrusts. Furthermore, I dealt with the entire road system and its pass through volume and checked the possibility of camouflaging the readiness positions.
Gradually, I felt sure, and now I committed my Wehrmacht adjutants to absolute secrecy so that they could assist me. Slowly, I gained the conviction that is eminently necessary to feel that this is the way and no other. In December 1939, the offensive plan moved from a mere idea into a more concrete stage. Great strategy takes place not only on an intellectual level, but according to its own laws, similar to city building and architecture, I am nearly tempted to say it is artwork. Should that strategy lead to a complete success, should it be achieved, it will be by a logical interconnecting of all tactical details, which have to be sensible and carefully planned.
These tactical details must be completely integrated and subordinated to one great strategic idea. They are at the same time both the foundation and structure. Naturally, precautionary preparations had to be planned in order to meet all possible unknowns. Furthermore, to reach the great goal, surprise is necessary. Now I had to deal with the details and the respective tactics of attack.
I took my time and did it thoroughly. From maps, we went to sandbox exercises. I still kept the circle of the insiders small. And according to my later experiences, my precautions were absolutely correct. Beginning January 1940, that strategy was solidly cemented by all tactical detail planning.
Now I took Keitel and Yodel into my confidence. No, I did not win them over for my plans right away. They disapproved and raised objections like, would it not be wiser to go northward around the Maginot fortifications? Just that is what the adversaries expect and make preparations for, I told them. My offensive plans were too bold, too daring.
Naturally, was risky. Not only the front thrust, but also the flanks from south, west, and even from the east were in danger in case the divisions following the first thrust are not able to secure the breakthrough area in time. They didn't make it easy for me to convince them. The blocking barrier of Maginot? Well, I was sure about that.
The Czech barrier forts directed against us then and built by French engineers similar to the Maginot bunkers. Not only did I have a close look at those, but they were for me useful objects for shooting trials. The results met my expectations. The bunkers were cleanly penetrated by direct shots of 8.8 special shells. Also, by stucca attacks, I would either eliminate them or keep them down.
Around the February, the newly nominated commanding generals, among them Manstein, reported in. General Rudolf Schmunt made me aware of him, indicating that his ideas about the war strategy in the West were nearly the same as mine. After he reported in, I gave Mannstein the opportunity to present his thoughts about the West offensive. Yes, it was as Schmunt told me. My thinking was this confirmed.
I still kept silent though. The fewer who knew about it, the more surprising the thrust would be. It would not have been prudent to let Mannstein know how far advanced beyond the basic strategic concept the tactical details had already been worked out. During his talk, Hitler had turned over map after map covering the months of the Droll de Goire funny war until May 1940. On the map, you could notice the markings of the takeoff positions for the attack.
I don't wanna get involved now with all the details like the rapid taking over of crossings, bridges, and barriers. Once they were situated close to the border, I engaged raiding commandos, partly even on bicycles so they could quickly and silently run over the enemy positions. Most important was the storming Of Eben Emael, the impenetrable modern barrier fort. It could be taken without heavy losses only by a surprise raid, by coordinating the attack from the air and the ground. Gliders should silently land on top of the fort and drop off the commandos.
Airplanes with parachute troops and gliders with rating commandos will engage as tactical considerations at the time require it. Whenever possible, airfields behind the enemy lines will be captured that way. Believe me, Giesler, all these attacks I discussed and exercised on a model with officers and flying personnel, pioneers, parachutists, infantries, and we succeeded totally. Hitler opened the next map. It showed the attack that took place on the morning of May 10 with the markings for the first day targets.
Following that were maps with sections of the different divisions, then a second map series marking the success by the individual panzer and battle groups. Drawn on a larger scale could be seen the hard battle for Sedan. That was the energetic thrust the enemy did not expect, then the breakthrough and the advance of the Panzers secured at their flanks by the forward pushing divisions. Now map after map followed, sometimes two for one day, graphically reporting the battle success of the panzer thrust along the East Side Of The Somun to Abbeville. He wanted to catch and cut off the French English motorized forces, which in all probability would cross the French border to enter Belgium.
My biggest worry was securing the flanks, counterattacks from the south and Southwest energetically executed would have grown to a serious threat. Logically, at the same time, the Schlieffen attack had to be seriously carried out in order to draw the main forces of the enemy, the motorized units, into Belgian territory. The deception succeeded. The mass of the enemy forces moved into those battle areas as I imagined they would and were cordoned off. The frontal attack of our divisions also showed total success and forced Holland and Belgium to surrender.
The operation, later called Zickelschnitt, the sickle cut plan, became a decisive success. But the total defeat of the western allies was not yet won. The opponent was actually decisively beaten in the North sector, pressed from the east and south by our fast moving troops cut off toward the West, only the sea remained as the last open flight path. The mass of those primarily English forces was concentrated around Dunkirk on the Flemish planes, which I remembered well from my World War time. Oh, I know.
My Dunkirk decision was described as a big mistake, not only by the circle of the so smart general staff, those know it alls, and those with their so Christian feelings thought it was my biggest stupidity not to have completely destroyed the already beaten British forces, various considerations kept me from doing so. First, the military reasons. The Flemish Lowlands restrict tank operations basically to the roads. Long drawn out battles with our own losses and the possible high breakdown of our tanks were to be expected. For further necessary operations toward the West and south into France proper, I could not sacrifice one tank.
But above all, we must not waste our strength and lose time. The enemy had been shocked. Now everything had to be done stroke by stroke. After listening to Runstead, my inner circle of military advisers also shared that opinion. It was absolutely necessary to continue the attack to the west and south without any hesitation before the enemy succeeds in building up a strong defense along the Somme and the Ime.
Our follow-up thrust already met with strong resistance there. It also had to be assumed the English would send additional troops assisted by the artillery support of their battleships across the channel. They could not let France down as they did Poland. We had to attack toward the West Paris, and Northern France had to be taken very fast to make it impossible for the English to land additional troops. We also had to direct an offensive toward the South with a thrust behind the French fortifications.
We had to enforce a final decision and thus bring the French campaign to a quick finish because there was another reason of a military political kind. I did not remain orientated to only one side. For a long time, I was listening, worried toward the East. And did not a slight possibility of peace still exist, even though a vague one, which I might have obstructed by a pitiless defeat of the Dunkirk army. Hitler was deliberating on rational grounds as he was so often doing in the past years.
He did not think only as a German. He thought as a European. He truly thought in a sense of a higher humanity, which he wanted to be realized within ethnically based unified societies. That he judged the possibility of peace higher, there is in my eyes one proof. On 06/24/1940, at his headquarters, Bruli De Pesche, he gave orders for peacetime tasks, issuing a decree on the twenty fifth giving authority to Speer and me to begin the restructuring of German cities.
Later, I was once more reminded of the mistake of Dunkirk. If I remember correctly, it was in August 1943 after the devastating air attacks in Hamburg. In an adjoining room, Hitler gave orders to an adjutant. A pile of photographs was lying on a table. I picked them up.
They were horrible testimonials of the effect the phosphor hail had on women and children by that terrible terror attack at Hamburg with over forty thousand civilian deaths. When Hitler returned to the workroom, he saw the photographs in my band. With a quiet but very resolute voice, he said, let it go. Giesler, don't look at the pictures anymore. After a while, I had to rethink it didn't agree with my character to step on the one who lies on the ground.
I was mistaken. Magnanimity will not be recognized. They repay my sparing them at Dunkirk with bombs and phosphorus on women and children whose men and husbands were fighting for Europe. What you see there is destructive brutality. He pointed to the photographs.
Again and again, one tries not to believe this. Now I know, no mercy. Those words were for me proof that his decisions at that time came from ethical ideas of war rather than only military and political reasons. I thought back to fall nineteen forty two at Winneza. Upset and pondering, I had arrived there late at night or early morning and could not sleep.
After Hitler talked with me, the explanation for his mistrust and chilly attitude toward the generals was evident. It was not commonly so because contrary to that, he kept the front officers and fighting troops in high esteem and of whom he said, they know what is at stake. It dawned on me why he so thoroughly explained with the map documents, his strategic and tactical decisions, and the way the French campaign was won. It was not based on the fact that the first example of that documentation was now set on the table. It was not just the explanation of his carefully planned campaign.
No doubt by reviewing, he wanted to assure himself that his strategic idea, his tactical dispositions were correct and had led to a surprisingly rapid success. His explanations were by no means arrogant. Deeds, courage, and self sacrifice of the soldiers and commanders always took first place above all events. He said to me, only with such soldiers and officers could I dare to plan such an audacious performance. He followed with the remark, the strategy for the Russian campaign was deliberated exactly the same way.
For a while, was silent, and then he continued. When I recognized, after the talks with Molotov, that no other possibilities existed, I had the choice, fight or give up and betray Europe. I decided to fight. It was the hardest decision of my life. I asked myself, why does Hitler reveal all these problems and thoughts to me?
Apart from the fact that his loneliness urged him to talk, he knew I was not only a national socialist and follower he could trust, but in addition, close to him as his architect. He also recognized that I understood his goals. Even more, he sensed that I saw him as a far forward thinker who was already planning and fighting for the next generation. The joint work on city building conceptions and their architectural details created trust. He accepted and respected me.
During those hours of mutual planning, he saw himself bound to peace and his real mission as forming a new social order of the German people and their environment. He found the answer to the challenge of the time, the challenge of the technique, and the challenge of the new social order. In those hours, he was lifted up. I was more to him than his architect. As always, I attended lunch.
Hitler was pensive. Our discussion was restricted to my impressions of the Danube Bank design in Budapest. Right on the first day of our joint lunch and dinner, I asked to be served the same food as he was having. Hitler mentioned that I could order the mess menu. It would not disturb him at all.
No, I replied. I'm not pretending. I really wanna get acquainted with your diet, and for the orderlies, it is simpler to serve. So I spooned the roasted semolina soup and forked the potato pancakes with vegetables. At that lunch, they served milk rice, and with it ground chocolate in a small cup as dessert.
I sprinkled some over the milk rice. Hitler criticized, that's too little. It is a rare pleasure. And then poured nearly everything out of the cup over my rice. I am not allowed too much of he remarked.
I could see that by his small rice portion. It was rather surprising how little nourishment he needed. After dinner, he said, Giesler, you are not only exhausted, but you also have not had enough sleep. I can see it. You will now take a walk naturally with company, with professor Brandt, and then go to the sauna, and you will sleep well.
I'm very busy with military discussions and deadlines. No planning talks today. I'll see you at tea time, late evening after the lager. During the walk, I talked with Karl Brandt, of whom I think highly about Hitler's loneliness and his great burden. If I am already worn out after hours in my small professional work here and the talks with him, think then about the continuous demands made on him.
No. Brandt interrupted me. You have to look at it differently, Giesler. It's obvious that you are tired out by the nightly discussions with the chief, but also obvious that for him, it means complete relaxation. He gains distance and new energy for decision making.
That's why you're so important here now. I had dinner at the casino barracks and had a chance to talk to field marshal Keitel with general Yodel present, naturally about the French campaign. I wanted to hear his assessment. Well, when I think about the past, it gives me confidence, Keitel said. He rarely talks about it.
He was probably inspired by the map collection. What he presented to you based on the maps, I can only add it was his idea, in all details, his work. He alone was the commander of the French campaign. Keitel continued. When he explained in January 1940, his concept about the Western campaign worked out to all strategic details, I was startled by his audacity even though I had to acknowledge the brilliant strategy.
Yodel nodded, agreeing, and remarked, we were pretty much perplexed when he put it on our table, complete with all the details. For his attack solution, he first won Yodel over when I still could not accept it, Keitel added. I asked myself, would we succeed in deceiving the allies to such an extent that they would thrust their motorized army and tank units into the Belgian Holland region in order to block the Schlieffen wing? Would they consider the breakthrough at Sedan as a tactical space limited attack only? Could the flanks for the panzer thrust to the coast be secured at all?
I never would have had the courage for such an audacious operation. General Schmunt said later that Mannstein had the same thoughts. His ideas were not accepted and were refused by the chief of the general staff, Halder. I found that out in January and arranged that Mannstein could present his ideas to the Fuhrer. That was possible when he reported to the Fuhrer after his nomination to a commanding general in middle February nineteen forty.
At that time, the Fuhrer had already planned and committed down to tactical details beyond the strategic operations up to the commandos he needed for Eben email. With an incomparable insistence, he pushed through his strategic ideas and all tactical measurements. When Manstein presented his ideas for an offensive campaign, he could by that time only confirm what the Fuhrer had intended. Field marshal Keitel and general Jodl were hanged at Nuremberg. General Schmunt became a victim of the July.
But the field marshal confirmed what I heard from him in Winiza in the notes he left. The courageous inspired strategy of the Western campaign was explicitly and absolutely Hitler's work. He alone was the chief commander of the French campaign. Where the acts of Hitler are least known is in the domain of war strategy. Apart from Cartier, who in his book, Les secreis de la guerre des voile a Nuremberg has established, supported by documents, the breadth of the military genius of the fuhrer, it is fashionable among the minds that think themselves distinguished to speak with an ironic condescendence of Hitler's interventions in the war operations of his time.
However, it is Raymond Cartier who is right. The most sensational thing about Hitler was, and history will indeed recognize it one day, his military genius, an eminently creative genius, a stunning genius. The invention of modern strategy was his work. His generals applied with more or less conviction, his instructions. But left to themselves, they would not have been worth more than the French and Italian generals of their generation.
They were, like them, of an older war, having hardly detected before 1939 the importance of the combined action of air force and tanks that Hitler obliged them to employ. Even de Gaulle, who is a pioneer figure in this domain, was that only partially. He understood that the brakes of the front would never be obtained by scattering the combat tanks battalion by battalion, with common cannons, with limited support. In that, he knocked down the outdated theories of the French general staff. By contrast, what de Gaulle did not understand and Hitler did with a vivacity of a genius was the indispensable combination of land assault by means of the mass of tanks surging at a precise point and of the simultaneous aerial assault of squadrons of planes attacking and crushing waves, the fixed point of brakes, crushing everything, opening a hole.
Without the Stukas, the break of the panzer divisions at Sedan on 05/13/1940 would not have been possible. It was the massive fall of thousand Stukas on the left bank of the Meuse that forced opened a path. Some German military men understood remarkably from the beginning, from 1934, the importance of the new strategy that Hitler explained to them. The Guderian's, for example, the Rommel's, the Manstein's. But to tell the truth, they were officers who were little known, even little important.
They were also discovered by Hitler, who sensing that they were receptive, pushed them forward, provided them with orders and the instruments. They were only a handful. The mass of German generals, recalcitrant or little convinced of these novelties, remained up to 1940. Specialists highly qualified in an outdated strategy which would not have in any way permitted the conquest in three weeks of the whole of Poland, nor especially the fabulous motorized cavalcade from Sedan to Nantes and Lyon in May 1940. Hitler was, militarily, an inventor.
People still talk of errors that he may have committed. The extraordinary thing would have been that, obliged to invent constantly, he did not commit any. But he invented, besides the strategy of motorized regrouping of land forces and air forces, which one would teach in military schools all over the world, also operations that were totally diverse, such as the landing in Norway, the conquest of Crete, the adaptation of tank warfare to the sands of Africa, of which nobody had thought up to then, and even also airlifts. That of Stalingrad was difficult, complicated, and perilous in a different way from that of the Americans in Berlin ten years later. Hitler knew each detail of the motors, every advantage or disadvantage of the pieces of artillery, every type of submarine or ship, and the composition of the navy of every country.
His knowledge and his memory regarding all these chapters was prodigious. Nobody caught him off guard. He knew about these thousand times more than his best specialists. Further, it was necessary to possess strength of will. He had that always to a supreme degree.
Politically, only his steel will broke all the obstacles, made him conquer the extraordinary difficulties that would have broken any other man. It brought him to power in an absolute respect for the laws, recognized legitimately by the Reichstag, where his party with the most numbers in the Reich was still, however, a minority the day Marshal Hindenburg appointed him chancellor. Strength and ruse, Hitler was clever, crafty, and also cheerful. He has been depicted as a wild brute, rolling in fury on the floorboards, biting the carpet with his canines. Between ourselves, I do not know really how this mandibular exploit would have been possible.
I spent many days and many nights close to Hitler. Never did I witness one of these furies that have been described so many times. That there might have been a few of these is certainly not impossible. What man, bearing on his shoulders thousand times less care than Hitler, has never blown off his top? Who is the husband who has not made noisy scenes with his wife, who has not slammed the doors, who has not broken a dish or two?
That Hitler sometimes mounted his high horse is not improbable, so much more that causes of irritation were not lacking. Imbecile generals who did not understand anything, who withdrew, who did not obey at all, who sabotaged orders, collaborators who lied, a rhythm of production that was not maintained, setbacks that appeared from all sides, fatal betrayals within his immediate entourage. But even then, Hitler was capable of remaining perfectly calm. I remember a quite typical case. One afternoon in the 1944, I was at Hitler's, where I had just arrived with Himmler in his long green car.
We were taking tea when, suddenly, a stupefying piece of news fell on us. The British airborne divisions had just been parachuted with complete success in Holland, just behind the Germans, at Arnhem, near Nemege. It was the entire system of the Western defence attacked from behind, and the access to the Ruhr threatened in an immediate and direct manner. It has been recounted, later, complacently, that a Dutch traitor of the resistance had, in advance, informed the Germans of this plan, which would have allowed the annihilation in a few days of these British divisions. This is a lie, one more lie, like so many others that were thrown up after 1945.
I can say that because I was there when the news was announced to Hitler and Himmler. It struck them dumbfounded. But I saw also what happened thereafter. Hitler, regaining his composure in two minutes, convoking his general staff, analyzing the situation for two hours, thinking of the facts of the case, then, in the general silence, dictating his orders slowly without any rise in his voice. It was impeccable and magnificent.
He stopped. He asked that they bring him some hot tea. And having closed the subject of the war, he spoke to me until the night about liberalism. I assure you that he had not eaten the carpet that afternoon with his teeth. He even made some jokes, then left, calm, slightly bent, to walk under the pines with Blondie, his dog.
Not only were these stories of the extreme fury of Hitler rather fabulous, but he was a delicate man, full of attentions. I have seen him prepare sandwiches himself for one of his collaborators who was leaving on a mission. One night when I was discussing matters with Marshall Keitel in a shack, he, the Abstimius, appeared bearing a bottle of champagne to cheer up our conversation.
@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante
Watch the full video here: https://vigilante.tv/w/18JD5diW6KTTRQebNDVAFv
@CorinneNokel - Corinne Nokel
Colorado ebo researchers —->
Colorado ebo researchers —->
odysee.com