reSee.it - Related Post Feed

jengleruk
Posted - June 15, 2022 at 7:28 AM
Saved - November 27, 2023 at 9:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2009, a group of billionaires held a secret meeting to discuss their influence and exercise of power. They aimed to overcome religious and political objections to their plans of "saving the world." Overpopulation emerged as their top concern, influenced by the richest man in the world. They disregarded elected governments and believed they could change the world without considering others' opinions. This concentration of wealth and media power raises concerns about their ability to shape public opinion. The full article can be found in the provided archive.

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

Here’s an article from 2009 reporting on a meeting of a group of billionaires. To me, its significance lies in what these individuals think the limits of their influence should be and how they should exercise power. 1/ https://thetimes.co.uk/article/83b550ca-5e98-4eff-a078-a8daf399d58e?shareToken=d2dffc6361e5dfe28b6422a62bbcfd93…

Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation SOME of America's leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world's population and speed up improvements in health and education. thetimes.co.uk

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

They met secretly, instituted by Gates, to discuss how to to join forces to get over those pesky religious and political objections to their plans to “save the world”. 2/ https://t.co/hUUsdUoqIR

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

Some high profile names were there. 3/ https://t.co/WB47oJPd50

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

They discussed what they regarded as important or sensitive stuff, though this just seems to me to be delusions of grandeur on display here. 4/ https://t.co/wDBgpAyPuC

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

It’s clear that if they didn’t at the outset, by the end they regarded overpopulation as issue number 1. Because the richest man in the world told them to think that. 5/ https://t.co/3hPBT4Bkc1

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

We can’t have politicians who believe in traditional values, can we? 6/ https://t.co/D2AjAZrSof

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

A consensus emerged… 7/ https://t.co/7KuEWdspYi

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

On the topic of voting and the democracy it implies, these people don’t think there’s a need to work with those irritating elected governments, obviously: 8/ https://t.co/KgTPVW2XQH

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

In a rare moment of self-insight, they note that maybe not everyone will be totally on board. “Let’s try to keep this amongst ourselves then, should we?” (Is that their secret language: “rich to rich”?) 9/ https://t.co/ZWHmOCXAl5

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

As I said, whether they’ve actually done anything to implement these objectives isn’t the point…. 10/

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

…which is that people whose sole qualification is being very rich think they can and should secretly plan to change the world towards their vision of it, without regard for what anyone else thinks - inc governments. 11/

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

This is especially scary considering how concentrated and centralized wealth now is, and how powerful such a few media companies (and hence people) are in terms of influencing the way we think and the news we see. 12/

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

Could there be any more apt a postscript to this article than this: 13/ https://t.co/6YJdxixhWn

@jengleruk - Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB🐭

Archive of full article here, thanks. https://t.co/9OoJZFozK6

@AnnizzleTG - Annizzle

@jengleruk Arkt: https://archive.ph/i0AX4

DC_Draino
Posted - April 24, 2023 at 5:36 PM
Saved - April 24, 2023 at 7:46 PM

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Powerful clip from Tucker’s recent spot on the Full Send podcast He says media is controlled by powerful people who run the world, it shouldn’t be trusted, and he regrets being part of the propaganda machine for so many years https://t.co/KqxyoGiHnf

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've spent my whole life in the media, but now I realize that the media is part of the control apparatus. I regret defending the Iraq war and not being more skeptical. When someone makes a claim, the important question is whether it's true or not. I participated in a culture that dismissed anyone who thought outside the prescribed lanes as crazy or a conspiracy theorist, and I'm ashamed of that. The media's purpose is not to inform, but to serve the small group of people who run the world. We should treat them with contempt because they have earned it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like, I've spent my whole life in the media. My dad was in the media. Like, that is a big part of the revelation that's changed my life is the media are part of the control apparatus. Like, there's no yeah. I know. I know. Because you're younger and smarter, and you're like, yeah. Yeah. But what if you're me and you spent your whole life in that world? And to look around and all of a sudden you're like, oh, wow. Not only are they part of the problem, but I spent most of my life being part of the problem defending the Iraq war. Like, I actually did that. Can you imagine if you did that? What do you think what is one of your biggest regrets in your career? Oh, defending the Iraq war. That is it. Well, I've had a 1000000 regrets not being more skeptical, calling people names when I should have listened to what they were saying. Look. When you when someone makes a claim, there's only 1 question that's important at the very beginning, which is is the claim true or not? So I say, you know, you committed murder or you rigged the last election Before you attack me as a crazy person for saying that, maybe you should explain whether you did it or not. Right. Yeah. And For too long, I participated in the culture where I was, like, anyone who thinks outside these pre prescribed lanes is crazy, is a conspiracy theorist, and I just really regret that. I'm ashamed that I did that, and and partly, it was age, partly, it was the world that I grew up in, so when you you know, the media, the media, the media, the media, the media, the media, the media, the I just didn't see it at all at all, and I'm ashamed of that. Isn't that what the media tries to do, though? It it's their only purpose. Right. They're not here to inform you, really, even on the big things that really matter, like the economy and war and COVID, and, like, things that really matter that will affect you. No. Their job is not to inform you. They are working for the small group of people who actually run the world. They're their servants. They're their praetorian guard, and we should treat them with maximum contempt because they have earned it.
Liv_Boeree
Posted - May 2, 2023 at 10:21 PM
Saved - February 12, 2024 at 9:13 AM

@Liv_Boeree - Liv Boeree

Our news industry is broken. Instead of optimizing for truth, it optimizes for outrage. And it's no one in particular's fault! It's the nature of the game itself. A classic Moloch trap. I explore this in my new film "The Media Wars" now available on Twitter in full: 👇 https://t.co/MCwX96StKD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses how the media industry, both legacy companies and social media platforms, contribute to the polarization and anger in society. It highlights the role of algorithms and the media's focus on negative news to maximize engagement and profit. The video argues that this unhealthy competition for attention is driven by a force called Moloch, which prioritizes short-term gains over long-term solutions. The speaker suggests redesigning social media algorithms and changing consumption habits as potential solutions to combat the negative effects of Moloch. They also emphasize the importance of understanding the perception gap and steel manning the other side to reduce online rage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our way of life is under attack. The patients are literally gasping. Too loud to say it is, that's extremely dangerous to our democracy. Liv, Look at this, can you believe it? That is outrageous. Quick, comment how stupid and awful he is. People need to be reminded. Okay. Wait. What if this just gives him more attention? Who cares? He can't just get away with it. True. I just can't believe anyone is this ignorant. Okay, so comment, let us know. In fact, maybe do a quote tweet so your followers see it too. So today, I wanna talk about rage because doesn't it feel like everyone's going a little mad lately, especially online? But I swear, every day, some new thing comes up. They might start out completely innocuous, but will inevitably dissolve into some Politicized nightmare of left versus right trends and countertrends where everyone's just screaming at each other through the digital void is also miserable and hostile, and yet, so weirdly addictive. I've lost count of How many times I've got sucked into some online debate even though I didn't even want to? I even had to get one of these stupid safes to keep my phone in Because the online world is so ever present and tempting. It's almost like there's some insidious force through it, trying to get its hooks into my brain so I can go online and do its bidding. You cannot die. And my personal issues aside, I wanted to talk about this because, well, frankly, this is getting really scary because not only are we seeing more and more sort of radicalization and civil unrest here at home, But this is increasingly starting to affect our chances of solving these really big global coordination problems like climate change and Pandemics and arms races, which require us to come together to solve, and instead, we're getting torn more and more apart. So what the hell is going on? You know, are we acting this way because everything really is falling apart? Or is it more that our perception of the world is getting twisted, Which is making us crazy and then sort of turning this all into a big self fulfilling prophecy. Well, as always, the answer is far from simple because It's certainly true that there are plenty of individuals out there who are directly profiting from all this drama. But the thing is, there's something even deeper at play here, A force far more reckless than any one individual company. A force so powerful, it can Whether it's the matrix or the terminator, at this point, we're all pretty familiar with the trope of humans naively building a for a machine to serve them, but then the machine takes over and makes them serve it. You have 20 seconds to comply. Movies have been telling story for years. In fact, it dates all the way back to 1927 in the silent film called Metropolis. Metropolis tells the story of this futuristic, Seemingly utopian city that seems great on the surface until we learn that deep underground, there's a huge machine which demands the blood, sweat, and tears Poor workers in order to keep everything running. Pretty dark stuff for the time. And remarkably prophetic given that it was written nearly a 100 years ago And that today, we are increasingly at the mercy of a giant machine of our own creation, except that instead of cogs, ours is made of bits. And Instead of feeding on flesh, it feeds on our attention. That's right, folks. I'm talking about our media industry, which, of course, up close is made up of Lots of individual people. But from a zoomed out view, essentially functions as this giant digitized attention processing machine that our species built in order to spread its news information more efficiently around the globe. And back in the pre Internet days, The machine was really just a small number of companies that kind of controlled all the news flow in a very centralized power structure. But, of course, nowadays, we have Social media too, as well as those old legacy companies. And so it's become this curious combination of both top down broadcast and bottom up user generated content, both kind of feeding into each other while everyone competes in a giant game of who can win the most attention. But this doesn't inherently have to be a bad thing. Right? Like, machines have made our lives so much better over the years, As has capitalism, which is ultimately driven by this competitive process. So in theory, having highly data driven, competitive media ecosystem should allow the cream to rise to the top so that only the most high quality information is what ends up getting Spread. And yet, here we are. So where the hell is it all going wrong? Again, those metropolis writers were strangely insightful. Because in that scene where the underground machine is first revealed, the film's protagonist has a sudden vision that there is something even deeper and more malevolent controlling it, Almost like something demonic has taken hold of it, a monster that consumes its victims as a sacrifice in exchange for power. And the name of that monster is Moloch. Now the legend of Moloch originally comes from a bible story about this war obsessed cult who was so desperate for victory, They sacrifice their literal children to it in exchange for military power. Awful stuff. But these days, It's better known as the god of unhealthy competition. In other words, the force of bad incentives, where players in a game end up more and more of their other values in order to get a short term advantage, which forces all their competitors to do the same thing. But then everyone ends up worse off than before. So like when businesses cut corners on environmental protections to boost profits, or like when athletes give into illegal doping because they feel like all their competitors are doing it anyway, Or when countries pull more and more of their GDP into military defense because otherwise, they'll be left vulnerable to their enemies. If you saw my video, the beauty wars, you'll remember how I covered myself in face filters to explain how these same molecule forces are driving this epidemic of body dysmorphia on various social media platforms. The thing is today, we're talking about the whole media industry itself. Allow me to introduce you to our new star, the media mollock. Good afternoon and welcome to Look at This News. Now we've got a lot of stories lined up for you today. Although, first, let me just say, live. Just because a bunch of teenagers are too dumb to realize that staring at Kardashianified versions of themselves all day long is going to be bad for them. Doesn't mean the same thing applies to All the good folks out there who are just trying to keep themselves educated on world events. They are just being responsible. And my media company is just keeping them informed. Well, perhaps that would be true if you guys painted an accurate picture of the world. But that's not your goal, is it, Moloch? Otherwise, you wouldn't be putting such an inflammatory spin on every damn story. So you're clearly optimizing for something else. The world is falling apart out there, and you're saying that we are overblowing it? Sounds like you're the evil one. Yes. Obviously, there are countless awful things happening every single day, as has always been the case throughout history. There are so many positive things happening all the time too. Random acts of kindness, disease eradication. Where are all your stories about those? Like, I can go scroll through Any major news outlet across the political spectrum and the ratio of negative to positive stories is just absurd. Like, why not just show a little more balance? Well, we all know why. Because bad news sells better. And the media have been capitalizing on the negativity bias, well, since the dawn of the printing press. In fact, here's a study that measures the tone of world events as they've been reported by Wikipedia. You can see the very clearly rough times during the major world wars. But aside of that, the vibe has trended pretty positively since the end of World War 2. But according to the media, things have gotten more negative over that time. So someone is clearly getting it wrong. And if I had to guess whose reporting is more accurate, media companies Whose primary goal is to win eyeballs to keep their shareholders happy versus the hive mind of thousands of Wikipedia historians. Well, I know who I'm betting on. Okay. So we focus on the negative stuff a little more than we should. But no one cares about good news. And look how many shares all my stories are getting. I'm clearly just giving the people what they want. Yeah. But are you actually? Because, like, we know people can get sucked into addiction or into cults, you know, down social media rabbit holes. And the trouble is We tend to assume it only ever happens to other people. It's really hard to spot when we are the ones being manipulated. But we really are. And it's not just by Sketchy social media algorithms trying to get us hooked on their feeds either. The legacy media are absolutely at it too. Like on Google, the New York Times' project Feals For starters, which uses advanced data science techniques to predict emotional responses to their articles so that their advertisers can better serve ads according to people's moods. And then, of course, there's the, awkward fact that news media directly profits from political tension. Like, no one boosted the profits of both the right wing And the left wing news outlets, more than Trump, even though half of them claimed they hated him. So no wonder polarization is getting worse. Your attention game is getting more competitive than ever, And our anger is the cash cow keeping half your companies alive. Because species have so many human emotions. Why is it always angry tribalism you fall into? Yeah. Well, we do normally have quite a nice wide range of emotions. The thing is, We don't just read our news anymore. We interact with it. And we've built these incredibly powerful, but also really dumb algorithms that are designed to just maximize engagement no matter what. And it seems like anger is like rocket fuel for that because it's not only a negative emotion. It's also a very active one that Triggers us into action, you know, to go and defend our tribe. And so it gets amplified way beyond how people would naturally behave. Here's why we need all this delicious anger. We've got inequality and climate change, pandemics, lying, self serving politicians. Doesn't it just make you furious? Of course it does. But these are insanely complex coordination problems. They're already at the limits of our collective intelligence, so they need us to be calm and rational and Work together to solve them and instead we're getting whipped into this rabid frenzy by both arms of the media machine. We've got algorithms whose Crappy design act like some kind of heat seeking missile for the most divisive insane opinions. And then we've got an increasingly desperate and clickbaity legacy media whose journalists now source More and more of their stories from social media and have had a feedback loop from hell. And meanwhile, you, through your machine, grow ever more powerful by the day as you and Perversely use Ask to go out and document the worst events on Earth and then mainline them straight back into our Olympic systems in 4 k 247. Essentially reducing our loyal species into a mindless factory farm of rage born junkies for apparently no reason but maximizing third party advertising dollars until we all fucking kill each other. So there we go. First thing I wanna say is I don't have some kind of vendetta against all media people or all journalists. In fact, it's kind of a quirk of the English language that we use Same word to describe someone who literally risks their life reporting from a war zone as a clickbait peddler who's just Optimizing for whatever the most profitable spin of the day is. But even then, those guys are often forced to write that way by their editors. And their editors are told what narratives to push by their bosses, who are all beholden to their shareholders, all trapped in Moloch's web. And while that doesn't absolve any of them from their individual responsibility, we have to remember that it is a real enemy here. Not any individual member of the media and certainly not one another. Although now you're probably thinking, ah, so mollic is capitalism. No. It's Certainly something that can act through capitalism, but it's much more fundamental than any kind of economic structure Because it's a force of game theory. Another way you can think of it is as a sort of personification of that mindless Force of disharmony that causes a cell to turn cancerous. It's the mindset of winning for winning sake at the cost of everything else. So then, how do we get Moloch out of our media? Well, there's no easy answer to that question, unfortunately. Otherwise, we probably would have done it already. But there is some hope because it needs 2 sort of key ingredients in order to thrive. Firstly, it needs a poorly designed competitive system, And then secondly, it needs a minimum number of individuals within that system who are unable to resist its bad incentives. Now with the first one, Well, luckily, right now, there's some opportunity to redesign social media algorithms away from divisiveness and rage and more towards Better sense making and information and just generally making them more fun. And as for the second one, well, that's on all of us. Right? Because our consumption habits Directly shape the type of content that gets made in the first place. And one way I personally found helpful is to start muting or at least ignoring Anyone, particularly any politicians, who build the majority of their personal brand around attacking the other side, you know, pointing out what's wrong with the bad guys without Offering any more productive, better solutions. Because if someone's whole thing is about just tearing others down, then it's just And more repetition of the mollock mindset, you know, this zero sumness that is so destructive. Also, I really love this perception gap website, which runs surveys and polls to measure what Democrats and Republicans actually think about an issue, but then also what they think the other side think about that same issue. And lo and behold, there is a big gap in what those two things are. In other words, the average person's views on both sides are much closer than what the media machine has led everyone to believe. And then, of course, there's the tried and tested technique of steel manning the other side. Steel manning the other side is the latest Breakthrough in cognitive technology to help those suffering from algorithmically amplified rage and hatred. Listen to your doctor. And if any of you guys have any techniques you've personally found helpful at reducing your own online rage, please share them below in the comments. On that note, thank you so much for watching. And remember, don't hate the players. Change the game.
WallStreetApes
Posted - October 6, 2023 at 5:35 AM
Saved - October 6, 2023 at 5:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The World Economic Forum's Great Reset Agenda 2030, known as the Agenda for the 21st Century, aims to establish a totalitarian state by controlling all aspects of society. It involves inventory and control of land, resources, production, and even human beings. The plan focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and harmonizing all systems for centralized control. The ultimate goal is one world government. This agenda impacts economies, ecology, and social equity, but its true intention is to empower corporations and exploit populations. Mainstream media fails to provide this information, so it's crucial to educate ourselves and spread awareness within our communities. We must fight for personal freedom and work together to preserve our individuality.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The World Economic Forum Great Reset Agenda 2030 Explained “Plan that was agreed to by 179 nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century. It's a totalitarian state being developed right now all over the world. Is the Inventory and Control Plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century. And so many of us around the world think that while sustainable development, it just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. Because when systems don't meet, when they're out of balance or not in sync with one another, they can't be controlled centrally. And the goal of Agenda 21 is one world government, from a central unit. Every nation that signed on to Agenda 21 has its local Agenda 21 plan. People in the United States are completely unaware of this. If I go out and talk about this, the United States press attacks me and calls me a c**t, which is totally ridiculous. It is a c**t, but it's not a theory. It's a fact. The three pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, the three E's. And everyone sort of thinks that they know what that means, the idea of social equity. It must mean that, well, everyone's going to have access to clean water and clean air, and no one's property's going to be used as a dumping ground because they are at a poverty level. But really what social equity is about is about impoverishing huge portions of the population and bringing down the developed nations. Everything that we're looking at now is destined to collapse our economies. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now, all over the world. And what major corporations want in this development is to be able to have full movementof workers without borders or boundaries, to be able to move their goods through without regulations and to reduce wages. And so this is the goal. So this is what you find with social equity. And of course economy and ecology is about, these are the three circles, economy, ecology and social equity. And where they meet in the center is balance. But really that balance is a communitarian balance. So it's not balance of well-being of the people. What it is, is it's a balance of corporations so that they can exploit and control and have populations in an area, in tightly packed, dense areas, so that they can be surveilled and managed. And this is what that balance looks like as far as the development of totalitarian state is. The mainstream media is owned by five major corporations and you're not going to get this information from the mainstream press. So you need to be your own press. You need to educate yourself. You need to get out there and educate your neighbors, your community, your real community. You need to help your children understand that they're being indoctrinated from pre-kindergarten to post-graduate school. All of us have a responsibility to ourselves and to others. This is true community, to work for personal freedom. & always remember that even though we work as a group, if we do work as a group, we're all individuals in those groups. And we answer only to ourselves. & this is essential. It's essential as free human beings. This is what we are. We are free. And we need to continue to be free & I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight and then make our friends and our neighbors and our community aware as well and work together.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Agenda for the 21st Century, agreed upon by 179 nations, aims to establish a totalitarian state with control over land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, production, food, energy, information, and people worldwide. It focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, but social equity actually leads to impoverishment and the collapse of economies. Major corporations support this plan to have unrestricted movement of workers, reduced regulations, and lower wages. The mainstream media, owned by five major corporations, does not provide this information, so individuals must educate themselves and others to preserve personal freedom. We must work together as individuals within groups to fight for our freedom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
This is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century. It's a totalitarian state being developed right now all over the world. It is the Inventory and Control Plan. It's the Inventory and Control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. This is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century. And so many of us around the world think that, well, sustainable development, it just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no, it really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. Because when systems don't meet, when they're out of balance or not in sync with one another, they can't be controlled centrally. And the goal of Agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit. Every nation that signed on to Agenda 21 has its local Agenda 21 plan. And people in the United States are completely unaware of this. If I go out and talk about this, the United States press attacks me and calls me an idiot, which is totally ridiculous. It is an idiot, but it's not a theory. It's a fact. The three pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, the three E's. And everyone sort of thinks that they know what that means, the idea of social equity. It must mean that, well, everyone's going to have access to clean water and clean air, and no one's property is going to be used as a dumping ground because they are at a poverty level. But really what social equity is about is about impoverishing huge portions of the population and bringing down the developed nations. Everything that we're looking at now is destined to collapse our economies. It's a totalitarian state being developed right now all over the world. And what major corporations want in this development is to be able to have full movement of workers without borders or boundaries, to be able to move their goods through without regulations, and to reduce wages. And so this is the goal. So this is what you find with social equity. And, of course, economy and ecology is about, these are the three circles, economy, ecology, and social equity. And where they meet in the center is balance. But really that balance is a communitarian balance. So it's not balance of well-being of the people. What it is, is it's a balance of corporations so that they can exploit and control and have populations in an area, in tightly packed, dense areas, so that they can be surveilled and managed. And this is what that balance looks like as far as the development of totalitarian state is. The mainstream media is owned by five major corporations, and you're not going to get this information from the mainstream press. So you need to be your own press. You need to educate yourself. You need to get out there and educate your neighbors, your community, your real community. You need to help your children understand that they're being indoctrinated from pre-kindergarten to post-graduate school. All of us have a responsibility to ourselves and to others. This is true community, to work for personal freedom. And always remember that even though we work as a group, if we do work as a group, we're all individuals in those groups. And we answer only to ourselves. And this is essential. It's essential. As free human beings, this is what we are. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight. And then make our friends and our neighbors and our community aware as well, and work together. For more information, visit www.fema.gov For more information, visit www.fema.gov For more information, visit www.fema.gov
gunthertree2
Posted - October 17, 2023 at 9:14 PM
Saved - October 18, 2023 at 3:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
David Rockefeller's leaked 1991 speech at a Bilderberg meeting exposed his desire for a world government. He acknowledged the crucial role played by mainstream media in keeping their plans hidden. This revelation raises concerns about media's complicity with globalist elites who control these corporations. Should we consider a world without mainstream media? Follow alternative accounts for unbiased information. Spread awareness.

@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮

David Rockefeller Leaked 1991 Speech At Bilderberg Meeting: Pulling Strings To Implement A World Government: In 1991 at a Bilderberg meeting, David Rockefeller said that without the use of [MSM] media organizations, “It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government.”. This quote is extremely revealing, as it proves that not only were he and others attending the meeting striving to create a one world government since well before 1991, but mainstream media (MSM) news outlets were aware of it and chose not to disclose this information to the public. It’s disturbing that MSM turned a blind eye to this; however, it’s not at all surprising given the fact that the globalist/elitist people attending these types of meetings are the very ones who fund & control these corporations. Would the world be a better place without these mainstream media organizations altogether? Share to spread awareness.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We appreciate the support of various publications like the Washington Post, The New York Times, and Time Magazine, whose directors have attended our meetings for almost 40 years. Their discretion has allowed us to develop our plan for a world government without interference. However, the world has become more sophisticated and ready to embrace this idea. Our goal is to establish a world system of financial control in private hands, enabling us to dominate the political and economic systems of every country. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) serves as our visible means to achieve this agenda.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings and restricted our policies of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the right by and publicity. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward the world government. Speaker 1: It reveals that these men aim to create The world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. In short, they seek total and quiet control of the entire world. And the CFR is their most visible conduit for carrying out that agenda.

@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮

Consider giving these accounts a follow for information the mainstream media won't cover.

danhanley4
Posted - October 21, 2023 at 5:18 PM
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 8:43 PM

@danhanley4 - Captain Dan Hanley

Never forget in these politically troubling times that 96% of the propaganda you read, see or hear is being spewed out by just six media conglomerates whose management has been totally infiltrated and overrun by Zionist spin doctors. https://t.co/si6jl5sZs2

No_Curve
Posted - October 23, 2023 at 10:49 PM
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 2:09 AM

@No_Curve - Rufus_2688

Just a reminder 🚨 THAT… Some members of the media… Use their platform… To push their own personal bias and agenda 😳 To contol exactly what people say and think 🤯 THIS IS EXTREMEMELY DANGEROUS TO OUR DEMOCRACY 🍆💦 https://t.co/bFSaoSwYqr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal agendas.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Unfortunately, some members of the media some members of the media some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal minds
ElizabethPDove
Posted - November 3, 2023 at 12:55 AM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 7:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unraveling the Intricacies of Online Movements: From Cicada 3301 to QAnon Summary: Explore the enigmatic puzzles of Cicada 3301 and the conspiracy theories surrounding its purpose. Delve into the emergence of QAnon, its influence, and the challenges it faced. Discover the power of narrative control and the strategies employed by syndicates to infiltrate and manipulate online movements. Uncover the potential risks faced by those who challenge the status quo. Stay tuned for more revelations. Note: The article is 499 characters long.

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

Behind the Veil, From Shadows to Light: Phantom Warfare's Quiet Conquest Thread 🧵 If you wish to read this in substack version, here is the link. https://elizabeththepunisherdove.substack.com/p/behind-the-veil-from-shadows-to-light

Behind the Veil, From Shadows to Light: Phantom Warfare's Quiet Conquest Cicada 3301 On January 2, 2012, a puzzle emerged on an image board called 4chan. What first appeared as a simple game of puzzles to be solved quickly morphed into a global enigma. The entity, or perhaps individual behind Cicada 3301, has remained shrouded in anonymity, yet their penchant for insanely complex challenges aimed at code-breakers across the digital domain has become a hallmark of their existence​. elizabeththepunisherdove.substack.com

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

Cicada 3301 On January 2, 2012, a puzzle emerged on an image board called 4chan. What first appeared as a simple game of puzzles to be solved quickly morphed into a global enigma. The entity, or perhaps individual behind Cicada 3301, has remained shrouded in anonymity, yet their penchant for insanely complex challenges aimed at code-breakers across the digital domain has become a hallmark of their existence​. The name Cicada 3301 isn't arbitrary. The life cycle of the cicada insect which is based on prime numbers. Prime numbers are important in cryptography. And so, the image of the cicada insect became not only a logo but a recurring motif in the puzzles​​.

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

The core essence of Cicada 3301's puzzles gravitates around data security, cryptography, steganography, and internet anonymity. In other words, staying anonymous. This is important to remember. These puzzles have earned Cicada 3301 a reputation as the harbinger of "the most elaborate and mysterious puzzle of the internet age"​. But why were they even created? Enter the conspiracy theories. Cicada 3301 purportedly designed these puzzles to sift through the masses and recruit "highly intelligent individuals." While the ultimate goal of this initiative remains veiled in mystery, speculations are rife. Some theories posit that Cicada 3301 is a secret society. Others stretch the narrative towards a cult or religious sect. There's also chatter suggesting that the puzzles were a recruitment pipeline for the NSA, CIA, or MI6, or even cyber mercenary groups. Yet others speculate it's an alternate reality game, albeit one that hasn't been monetized by any individual or company. Needless to say, there are a lot of theories but not a whole lot of answers. The purpose, identity, and the breadth of Cicada 3301's narrative continue to be a fertile ground for speculation and investigation, making it a captivating subject within and beyond the cybersecurity community. The internet will tell you that the last Cicada puzzles was in 2014. However, users of the image board 4chan will tell you that the last posts appeared in 2017. https://youtu.be/QTFUH5EMMiM

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2012, the Internet was captivated by Cicada 3301, a series of puzzles that emerged on a 4chan forum. Users discovered codes hidden in images, leading them to more challenges. The puzzles included phone numbers, coordinates, and encrypted messages. Speculation arose about the nature of Cicada—is it a secret society, a government organization, or a cult? One solver claimed to have been hired by the group, but their identities remain unknown. Cicada returned in 2013 and 2014 with more puzzles, including a book called Liber Primus. Since 2017, Cicada has gone silent, leaving the mystery unsolved. Despite the unanswered questions, Cicada 3301 remains one of the biggest Internet phenomena.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On January 4, 2012, the Internet went nuts. That's when cicada 3301 emerged from underground, infecting the minds of every online detective. Why is it called one of the biggest cyber mysteries? Cicada 3301 is a set of puzzles published between 2012 and 2014. The first challenge started with an image hosted by an anonymous user on a 4chan forum. It sounded like the spookiest job ad ever. Users soon discovered that opening the image but the text editor revealed a code. The code hit a link, and the link led to another image. Buckle up. That's just the beginning. After cracking more codes, Internet scavengers extracted a phone number. Calling it gave them another cipher. This is where it gets interesting. Speaker 1: Very good. You have done well. There are 3 prime numbers associated with the original final dot JPEG image. 3301 Is one of them. You will have to find the other 2. Multiply all 3 of these numbers together at adda.com on the end to find the next step. Speaker 0: The next challenge presented coordinates of locations scattered all around the globe. The magnitude of this riddle proves Cicada wasn't a 1 person army. What was it? A secret society of Internet prodigies? A government organization? Or a cult? Armchair detectives were pulling their hair out. Marcus Wyner, a brainiac from Virginia USA speaking to Rolling Stone magazine claimed he was hired by the group. According to Marcus, Cicada told them they are much like a think tank that researches and develops techniques to aid the ideas they advocate. Liberty, privacy, security. Brownie. The correspondence between him and the group went through the dark web. Marcus never found out the identities of his employers. According to Wanner, he and other solvers of the first puzzle worked on the Cicada Anonymous Key Escrow System, a software program to protect whistleblowers. Meanwhile, in 2013, cicada returned for a 2nd round of mysteries. The puzzles followed a similar pattern. Decoded images presented new ciphers that led to books and audio recordings with encrypted messages. The song you hear is one of cicada's riddles. The 2nd challenge of cicada also expanded into the physical but soon, the trace went cold. The 3rd and last quest appeared in 2014. It revolved around a book called Liber Primus or the first book. The book features images of ancient ruins. Only a small part of them have been sold. Enigma enthusiasts still attempt to the book's code. Cicada itself has been dead silent since 2017. Its last verified message refuted ownership of puzzles released by copycats. Will Cicada ever Return. Who are the people that created it? The mystery may remain unsolved forever. Yet one thing's clear. Cicada 3301 is one of the biggest Internet phenomena

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

Q Posts October 28, 2017, a series of posts on an image board called 4chan appeared. The conspiracy theory was initiated by an anonymous user known as "Q". "Q" began posting cryptic messages, with the first ones concerning an imminent arrest of Hillary Clinton.

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

Millions of people flocked to the boards to read these mysterious messages. Followers of Q became known as Anons. It was widely believed that Q compromised of a team of individuals (military insiders, powerful civilians, and President Trump whose posts were signed Q+) who were sharing information about a secret war being waged by then President Donald Trump against the "Deep State" - a cabal or network of influential people controlling the world​​. The name "Q" is thought to be derived from a US security clearance which typically stems from the Department of Energy. From Day 1, both the media and the government attacked both the Q messages and the Anons who were "decoding the messages" (which basically means answering the questions that were being asked by the posts and tying them to current news stories). There were thousands of articles written to discredit the movement. Followers were labeled domestic terrorists by federal agencies. Cyber attacks were launched against 4chan, which later migrated to 8chan. This did not deter its popularity as more people became curious about the phenomenon. But the movement didn't just attract followers. It also attracted a group of people thinking that they could capitalize off of a ready-made fan base. Over time, the Q posts evolved to include a wide array of "conspiracy theories", some old and others new. Many of those conspiracies have been proven to be more fact than fantasy. Ultimately, the movement, despite facing numerous platform disruptions and content bans on mainstream social media platforms, has demonstrated resilience, migrating to other platforms to continue propagating its ideologies. The movement has also found support and amplification from certain public figures and social media personalities, further fueling its growth and reach across different platforms and countries​​. NOTE: There is no such thing as QAnon. There is Q and there are Anons. https://www.bitchute.com/video/T46Y1OH7aMHG/

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the idea that there is a hidden group of criminals who have been corrupting the world and causing problems like war, poverty, and crime. It suggests that these criminals have infiltrated various sectors, including politics, media, and agriculture, and have amassed wealth and power. The video claims that there are good people working to expose and eradicate these criminals, and that the fight between good and evil is currently taking place. It mentions the role of the NSA and the Q Intelligence Dissemination Program in this battle. The video ends by urging viewers to recognize the true enemy and embrace a new future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever wondered why we go to war? Or why you never seem to be able to get out of debt? Why there is poverty, division, and crime? What if I told you there was a reason for it all? What if I told you it was done on purpose? What if I told you that those who were corrupting the world, poisoning our food, and igniting conflict were themselves about to be permanently eradicated from the Earth? You might think that an idealistic fantasy. Well, let me tell you a story. We acknowledge there are criminals, of course. They rob your house. They steal your phone. They can murder you too if they think they can get away with it. We have all experienced criminals in one way or another. Criminals, as we know, are those who choose personal gain over the rights of others and have not regard for the law. But here is where you need to expand your thinking. Criminals can also succeed in business and politics and can be elected as our leaders. If a criminal became the president, imagine what they could achieve. They could use the full weight of their executive power to commit much for crimes, and ensure they and their friends were enriched to the fullest extent possible. A criminal president could create alliances with other criminal presence, and then collaborate on more global criminal activities. Anything goes. Drug running, human trafficking, whatever makes the big bucks. The 20th century was turbulent with war, economic disaster, famines, and displacement. We have always accepted these things as just human nature and simply the way the world works, something inevitable and due to the weaknesses of human nature that drive us to these actions. This is where we were all tragically wrong. You are not a criminal. I'm not a criminal. So how can we just assume that it is human nature that is driving all this pain and misery? What if it wasn't human nature at all and as a result of something more deliberate? We were taught that capitalism was the cause of a massive rich poor divide and the reason for poverty, which in turn is the reason for war, crime, and starvation. Others But you see folks, it is none of these things. It is not our nature to fight and be racist. It is not in our nature to rob from others. What you must learn is that it was the criminals all along. Yes, they got power. More power than a criminal should ever have. They they rose to the top of media companies that control our news and entertainment. They sent it to the top of the banking system, Also to the Oval Office, to Brussels, to the Vatican, to the crown. They crept in quietly. They became leaders of agricultural companies who have control over our food supply. Also, big pharmaceutical companies, the ones we trust to help us when we're sick. Nobody stopped them, and they just recruited more criminals to help them. 1st, they accumulated the world's wealth. They invented a system of central banking, which lends money to governments with interest, placing countries into eternal debt. People's wealth got less. Their wealth got more. Much more. When a criminal is already as rich as they can get, then protecting their ill gotten gains becomes the priority. Angry citizens tired of being poor are a major obstacle and can revolt if they suffer enough. The criminals needed to prevent this, so they diverted attention to the last remaining competitor, the people of the world, you and me. We were not happy being ruled by criminals and having to work 3 jobs just to survive. They know we won't accept it, so they use their control of the media to set black against white, woman against man, Young against old, Muslim against Christian, they convinced us we were the problem so that we would fight and destroy ourselves. To get it done faster, they attacked all aspects of humanity that make us strong. Like family, using your influence over culture. They popularized lifestyle choices that led to a surge in broken homes, lost youth, and substance abuse. I could talk all day about how else they deliberately weakened us, and it would turn your stomach. We were just trying to get on with living. So where are all the good guys? Good people just wanna get married, have kids, make a living, and enjoy their liberty. Well, there were good guys. Many. 1 became the president of the United States in January 1961. He knew about these criminals and wanted them gone. He knew their intentions for us all and he wanted to fighting. Sadly, he had no idea how powerful they had become. Reagan also had with good intentions for the American people? He knew this criminal motive controlled almost everything by this stage, including the powerful rogue intelligence agencies. For me. His economic policies were promising, but the criminals needed a weak America to hold on to their power. Reagan was shown with a bullet that a growing US economy and prosperous citizens were not what the criminals wanted. It was looking pretty grim for good people. Every time someone wanted to stand up and do the right thing, they got stopped. Were we ever to be freed? These criminals are also known as the deep state, or cabal because of how they control things behind the scenes. Every president after Reagan was one of these deep state criminals, and And their empire got even stronger. With each back president came new deaths America and the world would sink. The world collapsed into darkness. Do you need me to tell you how? Destroyed factories, declining job numbers, sicker people, opioids, destruction of Iraq, Syria and Yemen with pointless war, displacement of people into Europe, ISIS, terrorism, collapsed governments, poverty and genocide. Total misery. Do you think that was inevitable? Hell, no. Well, here's where things start taking you turn. When the full picture or comes to be known, it will forever be regarded as the greatest story ever told. Well, here is the top line. Some good people still held positions of power. They valued humanity and the rule of law. While the criminals discussed their game plan at the annual Bilderberg meetings. The good guys were making plans of their own. The information age was coming to change history forever as the Internet and flooded into every home and appliances became smarter? And when people started carrying tracking devices, an opportunity to put an end to criminal control over the world was emerging. We became connected, trackable, and surveilled, but so did they. They became dependent just like we did on email, SMS, instant communication. It made crime much easier, but it also put them on a grid if that, if accessed by the right people, would expose their crimes to the public and end their iron grip on us once and for all. In this new age of information, it was thought that the military should also have its own intelligence agency to focus on cybercrime and espionage. They called this the NSA, National Security Agency. Here, we had every phone call, email, and text from every device stored and archived, whether it be someone making a doctor's appointment or the deep state setting up a massive heroin when purchased from the Taliban. In the right hands, it will be enough information to expose the entire sinister criminal plot to rub us blind and wipe doubt. All that thought, now I need to explain the plan. The good guys were devising a plan To reclaim the world from the cabal and return it to the people, it would involve alliances with multiple countries since the criminals their global ratlines, trade, and other infrastructure in place that would need their cooperation. It came down to 2 choices for America. Launch a military code to seize seize the government from whichever cabal puppet was in the White House at the time, or win legitimately, take control of the NSA, expose the criminals for what they are, and arrest them all. Obviously, the first option would be very troubling for the public. With people still preoccupied with cabal and your social issues, they would likely revolt and hurt themselves and others. No. It would have to be the latter. So they needed a candidate who could win and who could win big. Many states like California had been so heavily inundated by criminals, that even the voting machines were electronically set up to swing votes any which way, it would need to be a very decisive victory. Good patriots rates in the US military and their global partners asked Trump to run for president so they could take back control of America legitimately without alarming the public. Trump was a good choice, obviously, because he overcame the vote of fraud and won. But he was a patriot and he was loved and admired by the public. He was not interested in joining the cabal because they hated America, and he did not agree with them on that point. As soon as he showed interest in taking power, of their media assets to viciously turn on him, that's when we saw the sudden hatred emerge. Even when he won, the cabal still had no idea what was a part of, and the sophisticated plan that was about to unfold against them. Shocked at their loss, they mobilized their full arsenal of intelligence, media, money, and technology to try and take back power. There are people at the top of the DOJ and FBI that put together a plan to frame Trump and have him impeached. This is where we come back to the NSA again. All messages were stored and could be used to expose this flood and prevent Trump's overthrow. An entire book will be written about the 1st 2 years of Trump's presidency. False flag terror attacks, downed planes, missile alerts, assassination attempts. Here is the point. The world is currently experiencing a dramatic root war of biblical proportions. Literally the fight for Earth between the forces of good and evil. I can't put it in simpler terms, but I can say it appears the good guys are winning. The cabal had complete control over North Korea. They hijacked the Kim dynasty, took them hostage, and worked to build up a nuclear arsenal to threaten the world. Kim Jong un suddenly embracing peace was simply because the Each state were beaten and driven out. ISIS was also destroyed in the year following Trump's win. We are all starting to see the pattern now that enough time has passed, that our biggest global concerns are starting to recede, and peace is returning. It is all evidence that the good guys are winning the war. But we're still in the middle. While a lot is improving, it still puzzles many that most of these known criminals are still free, especially the higher ups like Hillary Clinton, the Bushes, and Obama. That is coming in the next chapter of the story. That's why we have Q. The good guys with control over the NSA began the Q Intelligence Dissemination Program to invoke an online grassroots movement that came to be called The Great Awakening. It started on underground Internet channels and then moved to the mainstream. Q has been a fun distraction for those who follow world events and desire truth, but it is about to begin a much more important in a necessary phase, keeping the public informed when the deep state war breaks out onto the surface. By this, I mean high profile deaths. Yes, folks, the criminals I'm referring to are famous politicians, actors, singers, CEOs, and celebrities. People who have earned our trust, respect, and admiration. They have done very bad things that are all fully known and documented, and they will be severely punished. Those of us who have followed Q since the beginning will be here to help you make sense of the coming events. We are among the 1st to realize that our petty partisan divisions are just trivial distractions, and we are all enslaved by a hidden enemy. We realized that the problem was never capitalism or socialism, or socialism, Democrat or Republican, black or white, Muslim or Christian. We know it was just very powerful criminals who had too much power. Fellow slaves, it's time to buckle your seat belt, recognize your true enemy, and embrace a new future that we all owe to the brave patriots who risk their lives to achieve this victory against the greatest force of evil the world has ever known. May God bless America.
Q - The Plan To Save The World (Remastered) Q? What is it? or who is it? Q is military information dissemination. It is the largest information dissemination project of its kind and is used to circumvent the main stream news networks to bring patrons truth and transparency... It's worl… bitchute.com

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

Whoever Controls the Narrative, Controls the World In an age where information is both a weapon and a shield, the narrative - the story told, the perspective shared, the version of truth propagated - holds immense power. Immense power. Whoever controls the narrative, in effect, shapes the perception of reality, steering the consciousness of the masses towards a particular direction. This is not a new concept; it's a practice deeply rooted in the annals of history. You see it in every advertisement, every TV show, every news broadcast. Yet, in a digitally connected world, the reach and impact of narrative control has been amplified exponentially. Narrative shaping is a potent tool and a perilous weapon, depending on the hands that wield it. The narrative forms the lens through which we view the world. It simplifies complex realities, provides context, and evokes emotions, making information relatable and understandable. This is the foundation of 5th Generation Warfare. Quiet weapons for silent wars. When a narrative is controlled by a particular entity or group, it shapes public discourse, molds opinion, and influences decision - YOUR decisions. Both on an individual and collective level. This control over narrative is often pursued by various actors - governments, corporations, media houses, and groups of influential and powerful individuals. Each of these have their own set of interests and agendas. In the political realm, narrative control is a linchpin for garnering support, neutralizing opposition, and directing the national discourse. By framing issues in a particular light - dictating the terminology, language, and definitions used and deciding which aspects are highlighted or omitted - those in control of the narrative can significantly impact public perception and, by extension, the political landscape. When you could control the political landscape, you control nations. When you control nations, you control the world, or globalization. In terms of the movement, a well-crafted narrative can enhance reputability, evoke trust, and drive loyalty, while a tarnished narrative can lead to a loss of faith. So what does that mean to us? The media, also called the fourth column, plays a crucial role in narrative formation and dissemination. However, in a scenario where media outlets are owned or influenced by political or corporate entities, the narrative can be skewed to serve vested interests, thereby compromising the integrity of information and misleading the public. And when the public decides it has enough of the mainstream media, a market opens for independent journalists and reporters. Enter the social media influencers of our age and the drive to control them. The rise of social media has freed narrative control to some extent, allowing individuals and grassroots movements to challenge mainstream narratives and bring alternative perspectives to the fore. Except, it also paved the way for misinformation, echo chambers, and divisive narratives to flourish. But it went beyond this. Because it wasn't just the media influencers. It was this mysterious and powerful message being spread on the image boards 4chan and 8chan. Since it couldn't be discredited, it needed to be controlled. Whoever controlled the narrative and the flow of information can control the world.

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

The B Drops What better way to control the narrative than control the messages that were leading the people  to freedom from those who were controlling that narrative? And there were many groups stepping up to the plate ready to do just that. If the boards couldn't be taken down, then why not fake the posts that were being posted there? So a group called the Majestic 12 came together. Majestic 12 isn't the UFO and alien group that you are thinking about. The name was co-opted. Their mission was to take over the Q Research board on 4chan and later 8chan and ultimately the Q movement. They had a built in audience. All they had to do was obtain control. So, the boards were hacked. Fake posts were made which looked like they came from the user posting as Q. The messages in these posts directed people to the Ingersoll Lockwood website. They used a VPN. It should have been untraceable. Except, it wasn't. Every post has what is called an IP hash (a scrambled version of your IP which is attached to every post). The poster of the fake Q posts immediately posted under his Anon account in response to the fake Q posts. He was immediately caught. The community was understandably upset. Jim Watkins, the owner of both 4chan and 8chan, was forced to launch an investigation. The posts were found to have been made by a Global Volunteer. Global Volunteer was an Anon who went by the name Baby Fist (aka Laughing Man, aka Ghosted). Once Baby Fist was identified, he made a post on GAB which said the following: "Hello frens. This is one of the few platforms I have left. Wanted to let everyone know. I am not B. I am babyfist, Laughing Man, Patchf****, "George Orwell" or abcu8. Or any other name you wish to call me. I assume it was Sgt B who posted as B. We are frens and did work together to influence QR between 4/20 and 5/5 2020. I will not tell who Sgt B is so don't ask... We were clear and open of our intention then. I will always be clear and open with anons. I am not B. Sorry for any issues this has caused you @ JimWatkins and Q community." It seemed like the matter was settled. Plot twist! A video emerges 6 months later showing Jim Watkins and an Anon who goes by the name Baby Fist in a Las Vegas hotel. https://youtu.be/SxVR9QUspeU

Video Transcript AI Summary
John the Revelator and James Kingsley are expected to join the conversation. They discuss a breach of trust within their group of Anons, where passwords were obtained from shared infrastructure. They emphasize that the responsibility to take action lies with the people, not an anonymous figure like Q. They introduce CodeMonkey and mention upcoming events to gather signatures for Ron's campaign. They express the need for support and encourage listeners to fight for freedom. The conversation ends with a reminder to visit usbees.com to make a purchase.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I got John the Revelator with me today. No. Hey, guys. We're waiting for James Kingsley and guests to show up. But meanwhile Tell me who's that ride in. Inquire a hotel room. Tell me who's that right? The roomer has it. Any people are sure. Okay. Let's see. I will see. So so, baby fist, I wanna know what happened when when that post showed up on the on the cue board. Now it didn't have a trip code with it, so I know it was not cute. Correct. Speaker 1: What happened? So to kinda make it easy to understand for people, I've worked with a small group of individuals, bunch of Anans, to put it simply. Nods. Anons. Anons. Yes. A bunch of Anons. Speaker 0: Anons. And one of them was Anon. Speaker 1: Yes. And, like, what I I won't say we don't Associate or anything anymore, but it was a breach of my trust, just like I breached your trust by letting it happen. But the The circumstances, you know, we share a VPS. We share drives. We share, just about All of the infrastructure of our little network. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: So they have access to my VPS, my Blah, blah, blah. And that's where most of my storage is, you know, save password. I don't keep them on my device. I keep them in The cloud and the private storage on the VPS. So my assumption is they got my passwords directly from the VPS as Four people total have access to it. I've explained the names. The names are all artificial. They go by director, admin, and b, and then there's myself, baby fist. And sergeant b is the culprit, if you will, but, You know, I'm not gonna say I'm not part of it. Like, I I'm to blame just as much as anyone I associate with people. So given you the Speaker 0: The user access as a as a global moderator. Speaker 1: Correct. And, like, he didn't have access to that until that happened. And, like, I've never known that he's logged into my account. He has access to my home network, this person. So, like, it's not Someone that I would consider an enemy, but they felt like it was the right thing to do. People have been waiting for q to come back. Mhmm. And if they know anything, when an operation ends, it ends. And if if it if it's a military operation, when it's over, it's over. There's no you could pray for them to come back. It's it's over. And the the message was supposed to inform people that it's in their hands now. And They just keep looking to some idol or some anonymous person to save them, and there's not gonna be someone to save them. It's us. Speaker 0: You have Speaker 1: to do it. There's no special queue clearance who's gonna save you from the truth And what's really going on? And it's up to you, me, the other nones, all the other people. It's up to Ron running for congress. Like, These are the steps we have to do. It's past the game phase or whatever you wanna call it. It's not a game. It's not a game. No. It's real life. It's Your freedoms, it's your children's freedoms all on the line, and the only thing between what they want And what we want is us. And, like, Trump fought for us, but he's not in the White House right now. Like, We have a resident in chief occupying the White House, and it's up to us a 100%. Like, They need to stop counting on, anonymous person from a message board to save them. Speaker 0: And and being that Kyu was anonymous, always anonymous, and and I don't know who Kyu was either. You know, that that's a fact. Speaker 1: Correct. Speaker 0: And Ronald doesn't either. If you Speaker 1: Actually, read and understand the cue drops. It informs you that this isn't a game and that this is real And that you, the people, have the power, and it got to the point where they were placing the power in this mythical figure they called Q, and they were expecting them to do the heavy lifting. But the truth is the last version of q is us. Speaker 0: Right. And and we're not we're not priding hiding as anonymous. You know? Really, you're not. Speaker 1: I'm Matt Chapman, if anyone cares, I'll tell anyone my name. Speaker 0: I'm gonna share this because people need to know we're doing this. Okay. Come here and say hi. We brought CodeMonkey here. Hello. CodeMonkey is here. We have 4, like, cameras. I have cameras in all the corners We're gonna have a lot of people here. I thought that would be Yeah. No. No. This is this point this point scans a bunch. Because it works. Anyway, we're we're all here. Okay. And we're this is Is Tony coming? Tony Tony's gonna be here. Some other anons. I need to go pack. You go back. Sorry. You gotta get out of your room. You gotta get out of here. Speaker 1: Mister Red headed out. Speaker 0: You're in Texas? No. Arizona. Okay. I'll see you in Arizona. And we're gonna get a 1,000 signatures on Saturday. I know how to do it. I just got 3 meetings for Saturday at different places with 400 people each. Can I ask you about that? You're calling me to come. Why why didn't we get the signatures earlier? Sorry. Don't speak. No. That's Too busy. Plus the website problem where they had the, district one and just 2 mix up on the website. So People can't even sign it digitally. The reason I can't, I wanna sign it. Okay? You can. So Get out there locally and sign the when we come around to your city, please come and sign the paper. Sign the paper. Is Christmas with no bread? Why not? You know why you should? Because when he gets into the White House, there will actually be digital disclosure. And we and he's gonna be America's representative in congress. Speaker 1: Me and Red, we're talking about his Presidential run after he gets this. We're already on to the next. He he's not old enough. After Speaker 0: soon he's Well, 2, 4 years in congress, 6 years in senate then. Yeah. Yeah. Why not? Then you'd be then you'd be totally like Speaker 1: You should really go to shop That isn't wet yet. You buy some merch if you want Acoon to stay up. Speaker 0: Yeah. Or you could be a bunch of Speaker 1: punks like you always are. Speaker 0: Then we then we can have 1 more camera in our office What what is this event you go at? I missed out on something. What where are you where are you at? You're at some event. You're in Vegas, obviously. Speaker 1: Visual disclosure for Ron. And, it was a campaign event, and we all came out to Vegas to support Ron's campaign And kinda spitball some ideas about Speaker 0: the future. Hey, James. We have a couple minutes, and then we have to Speaker 1: exit this room we're in. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Yeah. I gotcha. So I wanna I wanna go around Speaker 1: the room one more time. Speaker 0: Do you have anything you gotta say? You got 30 seconds. Speaker 1: Thank you everyone for showing up. Support Ron. Fight for freedom. And if you don't, I'm not gonna say it again. Speaker 0: You got anything to say? Yeah. Thanks for listening to the show. Go to us bees.com and buy some

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

Profile of a Syndicate How do you infiltrate an online movement? For starters, it would involve a complex and highly orchestrated effort to infiltrate and potentially manipulate any movement. What resources would it take to do this? Financial Backing It would require significant financial resources. Why? Purchasing media companies, cybersecurity firms, and conspiracy theory sites would take a substantial and sustainable cash flow. This would be a critical element in executing any plan. Organizational Structure The organizational structure would be similar to a organized criminal enterprise. This would include hierarchies and chains of command. This organization would be structured in such a way as to emphasize on secrecy, loyalty, and control. Political Motivation Clear and specific political interests would be defined. This would include the purchase of media companies on BOTH sides of the political spectrum. Token personalities representing the opposite side of the aisle may be employed. Their goal may be to manipulate public opinion or protect their own interests. Cyber Capabilities This group would have the means to both hire individuals with hacking skills and potentially resort to blackmail, demonstrating a willingness to engage in illegal activities. Information Warfare The syndicate would engage in a form of information warfare. One method would be by targeting anonymous messaging boards where the movement's leader posts vital information. Coordinated disinformation campaigns would be launched through various conspiracy theory sites. Secrecy and Anonymity The syndicate maintains secrecy by using multiple layers of intermediaries, making it challenging to trace their involvement. It would also make it highly difficult to map their network.

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

A Strategy of Infiltration Media Ownership Through their acquisition of media companies on both sides of the political spectrum, the network would easily be able to control the narrative. Through this, they could manipulate public opinion by promoting or discrediting specific messages or individuals related to the movement. Cybersecurity Companies The acquisition of cybersecurity firms provides the organization with advanced tools and knowledge to infiltrate and disrupt the targeted messaging boards. They may exploit vulnerabilities, conduct DDoS attacks, or employ other hacking techniques. Recruitment and Blackmail This organization would recruit individuals with hacking skills or manipulates disgruntled insiders within the anonymous messaging boards. These individuals may be enticed with financial incentives or coerced through blackmail. Blackmail material may be obtained through the discovery of personal and private information, such as personal identities, information regarding family members, and information about current employment. Basically anything that could be used to extort control would be. Disinformation Campaigns The organization would spread disinformation through the conspiracy theory sites they control. Attempts would be made to create confusion, distract, and sow discord within the movement. By strategically releasing misleading or fabricated information, they can weaken the movement's cohesion and effectiveness. Anonymity and Secrecy They would take measures to hide their true identities and intentions. Some of these measures may seem extreme. Operating through intermediaries would be vital, using encrypted communication channels to avoid detection. Individuals would be set up to be ousted or targeted as a distraction should it be required. Does any of this seem familiar?

@ElizabethPDove - 🔥 Madam Punisher 🔥 #ITR 🔥 🇺🇸

A Personal Note I currently fear for my personal safety. In the last week, I have had attacks that was more than just doxxing. But yes, I have been doxxed. Some of the information is correct. Some of it is wrong. I will not confirm or deny anything in order to keep my personal identity just that... personal. I have never lied about who I am. I have always tried to be accurate in my message. The problem was I got a little too close to the truth. If it was just a doxxing or trolling, I would have disregarded the attacks as normal. However, they weren't. Some of these attacks were beyond my technical understanding other than knowing it is possible. Then there was the attacks against several other Anons. They were precise and purposeful. These attacks are coordinated. They aren't random. There is a very specific reason as to why they are happening. I am going to expose that reason. And if something happens to me? There are others who have that information who can share it. The only way to win the game is to change the rules. I changed the rules. We have it all. To my attackers: I cannot be threatened. I cannot be coerced. I cannot be blackmailed. There is nothing you can do to me to stop what is coming. This is not a game. To be continued... https://elizabeththepunisherdove.substack.com/p/behind-the-veil-from-shadows-to-light

Behind the Veil, From Shadows to Light: Phantom Warfare's Quiet Conquest Cicada 3301 On January 2, 2012, a puzzle emerged on an image board called 4chan. What first appeared as a simple game of puzzles to be solved quickly morphed into a global enigma. The entity, or perhaps individual behind Cicada 3301, has remained shrouded in anonymity, yet their penchant for insanely complex challenges aimed at code-breakers across the digital domain has become a hallmark of their existence​. elizabeththepunisherdove.substack.com
ShadoeDavis
Posted - November 28, 2023 at 8:11 PM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 11:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canadian media corruption: a personal account. Incompetence and subversion: a manager with no radio experience criticized my "right-wing views." The new breed: a producer indoctrinated in CRT dismissed my concerns about racism against white people. Workplace sensitivity training and bullying: mandatory sessions promoting a Marxist narrative. Pressure from management led to my constructive dismissal. Media compromised by pervasive implementation of biased policies. #CanadianMediaCorruption

@ShadoeDavis - The Shadoe Davis Show

I spent many years in Canadian media and I knew it was corrupt but these new levels of corruption are well beyond anything I ever thought. I wish I could put my finger on just one thing about all this but that’s impossible as it’s a combination of things. 1) Incompetence and subversion: During my final years on radio I was the morning host at Winnipeg’s @680CJOB The manager was brought over from the TV side of the operation and knew nothing about radio. He was a camera operator who graduated through the ranks , how I have no idea but there he was trying to coach me somehow. I went along with it for a time but then a few months in he said something I will never forget. “Shadoe your right wing views are becoming a big problem.” “Excuse me?” I said. Then he mumbled something I couldn’t quite make out and a few seconds later we were interrupted by a knock on the office door. At the time my “right wing views” consisted of wanting a balanced government budget and finding the trans movement ridiculous. I asked him about it a week later and he tried to gaslight denying he would ever say such a thing. He did say it. I’ve since wondered how much that played in what was to come. 2) The New Breed: I had a morning show producer, a young woman relatively new to the industry. She was put in charge of the content of my show as I could not be trusted even though that was never said out loud. It was intimated I should be happy to have the help. I liked her and we got along rather well but one morning we were having a lively discussion about racism in which she said, “Shadoe you cannot be racist against white people.” I was discussing the hiring practices of governments at all levels and wondered why there were so few “white people” in front line jobs. I said “of course you can, racism is racism.” She was shocked speechless by that and walked away. Things were never quite the same after that. I didn’t understand it then in 2017 but she’d been indoctrinated into CRT, probably in journalism school. From there I noticed that every younger member of the newsroom carried the same attitude & looked down upon those who disagreed. 3)Workplace sensitivity training & bullying: During my last few months there, once a week the company brought somebody in to discuss “feelings, racism, sexism, bullying and safe spaces” with the staff usually via zoom. I attended the first one for 15 minutes then got up and left. I could not be a part of the complete crap they were dishing and said as much to the manager during a meeting the next day. He told me I was setting a poor example for the rest of the staff considering my influential position. My response was, “I am setting a tremendous example to the staff by not attending.” It was not mandatory, at least not while I was there, but it was heavily pushed to the point that if you didn’t take part you would be ostracized in the hallways out of fear or righteousness depending on the person or group. After that the pressure on me from management mounted. It was clearly a constructive dismissal in play & the only thing to do, especially with my mental state at the time, was to go to my Dr. and have him authorize stress leave which I took. I returned a month later and was fired 3 months after that. At the time I was relieved and devastated at the same time but now looking back it’s all very clear. Play the game or your career is over. The game these days is to obscure facts that don’t align with a clearly Marxist narrative and to insinuate anybody that doesn’t go along is “anti” this or “denier” that. And guess what? 99% of the corporate “journalists” are playing. I’ve never seen a corporate directive to implement these types of policies as mandatory because legally they can’t, however I believe it is intentionally pervasive and comes right from the top. They start with one key staff member then watch it spread. It’s insidious and in my opinion that’s how the media has been compromised. Feel free to repost.

BrainStorm_Joe
Posted - December 11, 2023 at 12:29 PM
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 6:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
BlackRock's dominance in messaging is concerning. Citizen journalists play a crucial role in uncovering truth. Our information flow is controlled, highlighting the significance of Q. We must fight against this control and prioritize finding the truth.

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

This is who we should be fighting against.. BlackRock owns 90% of the messaging being pumped out... This is why citizen journalists are imperative.. This is why finding the truth is of the utmost importance. We are literally being controlled through information flow. This is why Q was so important.

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, a powerful and relatively unknown company, owns a significant portion of major media companies like Fox, CBS, and Comcast. They also have investments in tech giants like Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, as well as Disney. In fact, BlackRock essentially owns 90% of the world's media. They recently gained access to China's mutual fund industry, allowing them to invest in Chinese companies, including those blacklisted by the US. The money BlackRock uses comes from pension funds and ordinary people's bank accounts. With their vast ownership and access to personal data, BlackRock has significant influence and control. This raises concerns about privacy and the potential misuse of personal information.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Larry Fink holds such power. Why is it that you have not heard of them more? There is power in anonymity. If BlackRock is barely featured in print publications and news channels, it is because they want it to be so. If they wanted, they could feature every day. BlackRock currently owns 18% of Fox, 16% of CBS, and 13% of Comcast, which in turn owns NBC, MSNBC, and God. If any of those companies wanted to make a decision, they would have to also consult with BlackRock before doing so. The same is true for Google, a tech giant currently worth $853,000,000,000. Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter are also not exempt, and neither is Disney. Thanks to their incredibly diverse investment portfolio in media alone. BlackRock essentially owns 90% of the world's media. If you don't know about them, it's because they don't want you to. Why? Owning a portion of the world doesn't come without its share of scandal or conflict. This 2020, BlackRock became the 1st foreign company to be allowed into China's mutual your fund industry, which means they can now invest and own parts of Chinese companies, including ones that are blacklisted by the United States. It. One of the first investments made by BlackRock was in Hikvision, a security and communications firm that essentially makes facial recognition software for use by the Chinese government. But this money isn't just Black Rocks or Barry Finks. It comes from pension funds and bank accounts of ordinary civilians who have unknowingly given money to BlackRock in the past. If we take into account BlackRock's ownership over Western media, banks, ecommerce stores, social media, food and beverages, and many, many more industries. It becomes evident it that the company has a wealth of data on us. They may do with it what they please. TikTok's data harvesting pales in comparison to what BlackRock is capable of, given how they have everything from our bank account numbers to our personal tastes and preferences. As BlackRock's investment in China China grows, so will China's influence on the world. And our personal data, which was hanging on a thread to begin with, will quickly end up in the wrong hands. With the trajectory BlackRock has been on
_BlakeHabyan
Posted - December 12, 2023 at 2:14 AM
Saved - December 12, 2023 at 5:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In this thought-provoking video, the dangers of media centralization are explored. By controlling information flow, it sets boundaries and discredits alternative viewpoints. Back in 1917, 12 news managers were hired by JP Morgan interests to control the policy of influential newspapers. This led to today's media monopoly, often seen as propaganda. However, society seems ready to embrace independent media and unbiased sources. Will this be the turning point?

@_BlakeHabyan - Blake

Watch: Powerful Video: Will This Video Make You Abandon Corporate Media Forever? This is an extremely interesting video. Centralization of media creates an extremely dangerous environment by controlling the flow of information that people consume. It sets boundaries and frames the narratives for society to blindly follow, while discrediting alternative viewpoints. In 1917, JP Morgan interests hired 12 high ranking news managers. Those 12 determined the most influential newspapers in America. They were to figure out how many news organizations it would take to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. It was found that it was only necessary to purchase the control of the top 25. An agreement was reached. This snowballed into the monopoly on media we see today that has largely become propaganda. It feels like we’re reaching an inflection point, where society is ready to accept independent media and various sources who aren’t bought and paid for or compromised.

Video Transcript AI Summary
World of Picture Television is a news outlet that relies on central news agencies Reuters and the Associated Press, both of which were bought by the Rothschild family. The Rothschilds also control major TV networks, radio stations, newspapers, and publishing empires through their corporate conglomerates. These conglomerates include General Electric and Westinghouse, which profit from promoting wars. The internet, publishing, recording, and top cable companies are also controlled by the Rothschild, JPMorgan, Rockefeller, and Oppenheimer Brotherhood. These media owners have corporate sponsors who support their pro-business and pro-government programming. The video also mentions instances of fabricated news and the influence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in shaping media agendas.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: World of Picture Television brings us the news of the world through 2 central news agencies called Reuters and the Associated Press. The Rothschilds bought Reuters in the 1800s which later bought the Associated Press and made the Rothschild family owners of the world's largest central news services. To the present day, the world depends on these Rothschild owned central news services as their main source of news and information. In his book called Who Owns the TV Networks? Author Eustace Mullins claims The major TV networks, radio stations, newspapers, and publishing empires are controlled by the Rothschild, Rockefeller, and JPMorgan money cartels sells through their corporate conglomerates. The bankster owned media conglomerates include weapons manufacturers General Electric and Westinghouse which profit from promoting wars. Control over the internet, publishing, recording, and top cable companies can be traced back to the same big Five media empires: General Electric, Time Warner, Viacom, Disney, and News Corp. These media These are owned directly or indirectly by the Rothschild, JPMorgan, Rockefeller, and Oppenheimer Brotherhood. Yes, there are now more stations and more media voices but they're all coming from the same ventriloquist. Every TV show needs corporate sponsors and corporate Sponsors sponsor pro business, pro government programming, and journalists who support the agenda of the Big Five media owners. While 2 thirds of the world goes hungry, these banksters offer kazillion dollar sponsorships to sports athletes to play with their balls. Why? Because they keep the masses distracted from the important issues. Speaker 1: And welcome back to the show, ice cream, you scream. You know the rest. Speaker 2: Ice cream, you scream. You know The rest. Speaker 1: I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I scream, you scream. You know the rest. Well, I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I scream, you scream. Speaker 3: Well, you know I scream, you scream. Speaker 2: Well, you know the rest. Speaker 3: I scream, you scream. We all well, you know the rest. Speaker 1: I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I Screen, you scream. We all know the rest. I scream, you scream. You know the rest. Speaker 3: I scream, you scream. Well, you know the rest. Speaker 1: I scream, you scream. You know the rest. Speaker 3: A child's happiness is priceless, especially on a birthday. A child's happiness is priceless, Especially on a birthday. Speaker 0: Happiness in a price list, especially on a Speaker 2: 1st, the severe flooding here in the northeast as more rain continues to fall today, NBCC's Michelle Kaczynski, I guess she's in a canoe, is in Wayne, New Jersey this morning. Michelle, good morning to you. Speaker 1: Good morning. Well, obviously, we're getting a nice break from the rain, but not the flooding. This is essentially now a part of the Passaic River in this neighborhood. It rushed in yesterday. Speaker 0: I just got a Picture of the conditions that Caleb Brown has been living in for the past 2 months. Essentially, she was by the neck inside of what would look like a steel cage, roughly 4 by 4 by 6, and that steel cage was then inside of a larger, container. Now a massive search is underway this field behind me because the victim herself told police that she believes as many as 4 bodies may be buried here. George? Speaker 4: Boy, that is just horrific. An ABC news producer is being investigated by the network after reported evidence that a live camera shot on Good Morning America was doctored By falsely stringing police tape in the background. The shot featured reporter Lindsey Davis in Woodruff, South Carolina, where a woman was allegedly held captive in a storage by a registered sex offender. Behind Davis, yellow police tape can be seen with the words sheriff's line do not cross. A wider Photograph of the scene shows that police tape was actually just attached to some ABC camera equipment to enhance the scene. Speaker 5: Dateline NBC, A prime time news program airs a story in 1992 entitled, Waiting to Explode. The story includes footage demonstrating that a line of trucks produced by General Motors readily explode on impact. Speaker 6: To see for ourselves What might happen in a side impact crash, Dateline NBC hired the Institute For Safety Analysis to conduct crash At impact, a small hole was punctured in the tank. According To our experts, the pressure of the collision and the crushing of the gas tank forced gasoline to spew from the gas cap. The fuel then erupted into flames when When ignited by the impact in cars' headlight. Speaker 5: After the program airs, one of the firemen at the taping of the crash contacts GM. The conversation inspires a full scale investigation. 3 months later, NBC is forced to reveal their role in fabricating the news. Speaker 7: NBC's contractor did put incendiary devices under the trucks To ensure that there would be a fire if gasoline were released from the truck's gas tank. Speaker 3: We said the crash, quote, forced gasoline to spew from the fuel cap, GM says since the gas cap was the wrong cap for the GM filler tube and because the gas tank was overfilled, the cap Came off when the impact occurred. Speaker 7: We agree with GM that we should have told our viewers about these devices. Speaker 3: The Dateline reporter, however, said, quote, at impact, a small hole was punctured in the tank, unquote. GM has now x rayed that tank and found No hole. Speaker 7: We acknowledge the placing of the incendiary devices under the truck was a bad idea from start to finish. Speaker 3: That's our new policy and And we'll be right back. Speaker 8: Look at the pyramid. In the first couple layers, the really eager, hardworking young journalists are out there trying to get the stories, He's trying to make a name so they can move up that pyramid. Well, the further they move up the pyramid, the more Or they realize that, you know, the outlets really aren't interested in Major news that rocks the boat. Speaker 5: The boat Charles refers to belongs to those at the top of the pyramid, where the interests of the Media outlets are quietly defined. Representative Oscar Callaway enters a disturbing statement into the US congressional record. The statement reveals why JP Morgan interests hired 12 high ranking news managers. The 12 were asked to determine the most influential newspapers in America. They were to figure out how many news organizations it would take to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. The 12 found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached. The policy of the papers was bought and an editor was placed in each paper to ensure that all published information was in keeping with the new policy. Soon, that policy would be defined by a front group formed by JP Morgan and his colleagues. In fact, Morgan's personal attorney was founding president of the organization, The council on foreign relations. Today, the CFR maintains that its goal is to increase America's understanding of the world. However, the actual objective of this highly club is revealed by the rare admissions of the insiders themselves. In the early sixties, a Georgetown University professor collects information for a book favorable to the network of powerful men who founded the CFR. Afar. For 2 years, professor Carol Quigley is allowed to examine the confidential papers And secret records of this network. Quigley reveals that these men aim to create a world system of financial control in private hands. Able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. In short, they seek Total and quiet control of the entire world. And the CFR is their most visible conduit for For carrying out that agenda. CFR members include America's wealthiest tycoons As well as the highly placed elite in government, academic institutions, tax exempt foundations and the establishment media. Ruling class journalists written by Richard Harwood describes the CFR membership as the ruling establishment in the United States. The Washington Post article boasted that news reporters who are CFR members do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy For the United States, they helped make it. Who are these policymakers? Many of their Places are familiar. NBC's Tom Brokaw, CBS's Dan Rather, ABC's Barbara Walters, Jim Lehrer of PBS, William f Buckley of National Review, media mogul Kurt Murdoch, owner of the giant multifaceted news corporation. These media heavyweights and many others like them are members of the CFR. Powerful corporations are also invited to become members. At the close of 20th century, CFR influence presided over far reaching consolidations of media control. In 1995, CFR members Michael Eisner of Disney and ABC's Thomas Murphy merged their media empires. Soon after the merger, The Disney ABC empire becomes a CFR corporate member. In the year 2000, the world's largest Internet service provider, America Online, joins forces with Time Warner, one of the world's largest news organizations. The CEOs favoring the move are CNN's Thomas Johnson and Time Warner's Gerald Levin, both CFR members. Once again, another media giant is created under the shadow of CFR influence. Today, an elite handful of individuals define the agendas that are supported by the empire of establishment news. Speaker 1: Do you have any people being paid Speaker 9: by The CIA who are contributing to a major American Journal. Speaker 10: We do have people who submit pieces to other to American journals. Speaker 1: Do you have any people Paid Speaker 9: by the CIA who are working for Speaker 1: Television networks. Speaker 10: This I think gets into the kind of, getting into the details, mister chairman, that I
listen_2learn
Posted - December 26, 2023 at 6:09 PM
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 6:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The mainstream media is seen as a propaganda tool by some, posing a threat to democracy. It is believed that they aim to dismantle western democracies in favor of a global technocratic regime. This perspective views the media as an enemy of freedom.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the establishment. No thinking person should believe anything they say. They are a threat to “our democracy”. https://t.co/HLVtAqMHav

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features a discussion about the unvaccinated and their impact on society. Some speakers blame the unvaccinated for being the problem and suggest they should be shamed. Others argue that the blame should be placed on the unvaccinated instead of the vaccinated. The conversation touches on issues of freedom, personal choice, and the responsibility to protect others. One speaker mentions the frustration and anger felt by the vaccinated towards the unvaccinated. The video also briefly mentions a segment sponsored by Pfizer and questions the lack of critical questioning by journalists.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who are Speaker 1: the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story. Speaker 2: The only people that you can blame the only people you can blame this isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed by the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: It's time for the start Blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks. Speaker 4: Anyone you came into contact with will blame you as will the rest of us who've done the right thing by getting vaccinated. Speaker 1: Because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: I think it's time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat. Speaker 1: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect The unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value. You're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the the sins of the unvaccinated. People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically Well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well. Speaker 3: The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts and running around the country saying, Speaker 5: we don't care. We're living Free and so forth. Speaker 6: We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. Speaker 4: The unvaccinated, a group that includes Children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. Speaker 0: The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or Angry. Speaker 6: This is not about freedom or personal choice. Speaker 3: Well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom. Speaker 7: The other day, Howard Stern weighed in Speaker 8: with a much different approach. Take a look. Speaker 1: Mhmm. When are Speaker 6: we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this country And just say, you now it's mandatory to get vaccinated. The freedom Speaker 0: But you're treading on our freedom, and you're making other people sick. You're really killing other people. Speaker 9: Get the Yeah. This goes on for 3 minutes. You can seek it out online, all of this. And no one ever apologized. They could they could just apologize and say, look. We didn't know. We bought the biopharmaceutical lines that Speaker 6: They sponsor every one of our segments. Speaker 9: Right. Speaker 6: This Anderson Cooper segment was brought to you by Pfizer. So What can you imagine the contrition? I think it actually came out and they said, yeah. You know, Anderson Cooper 360 is a is a show sponsored by Pfizer. We just didn't do our homework as journalists, And we were we were taking money from them. Speaker 9: We chose not to go through their clinical trials Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 9: Not to ask critical questions about their percentage of, infection rate. We just chose not to, and we believed that anyone who was choosing to do that was a conspiracy theorist.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://t.co/usR0OykTBq

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

What is happening here is happening in all western “democracies” as they must destroy the west in order to transition to a one world technocratic fascist totalitarian government. The media is the propaganda arm of the establishment. They are the enemy of freedom. https://t.co/rUtfK6MDhx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the mainstream media for spreading propaganda and gaslighting the population on various issues like energy transition, migration, agricultural policy, COVID, and lockdowns. They express a lack of trust in the media and government, stating that there is no evidence of them trying to regain trust. The speaker also discusses new laws on misinformation and disinformation, viewing them as an attempt to fortify those in power and prevent change. They argue that democracy should allow for the possibility of voting out a government that does a bad job, rather than changing institutions to stay in power. The speaker questions the idea of preventing certain political parties from winning, emphasizing that it is the people's choice, not the speaker's or anyone else's.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know this is a harsh thing to say, and they must stop falling for the propaganda from the mainstream media because that is what it is. I'm very sorry to say this. These are harsh words, and I would have not said the same thing 6 months ago, but they are gaslighting the entire population. The numbers are there, right, again, from the energy transition to migration to agricultural policy, to COVID, to lockdowns. The populations of the west have been gaslit on all major issues. We can no longer trust them. I mean, can they earn back our trust? I would say so. But so far, I see action or evidence that they're trying to do so. They try to entrench those who are in power even further. And you see this also on the European level, all these new laws about misinformation and disinformation and malinformation. This is just this absurd idea. Basically, you wanna fortify democracy against any change of those who are in power, which is the very opposite of what democracy is supposed to be. The whole point of democracy is that if a government does a bad job, you can vote them out. The new approach is even if we do a bad job, we have to change the institutions in a way that we can never get out of office again. This is when they say, we cannot allow Donald Trump to win. Like, we cannot allow the AFD to win. But the question is, why not? It's the people's choice, not yours. If you really think you're entitled to power, that's the first sign that you have lost any entitlement to power because that's the least democratic thing, the least democratic position you can ever hold.
Cancelcloco
Posted - February 8, 2024 at 2:30 AM
Saved - February 8, 2024 at 7:12 AM

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

Have you ever wondered who’s in charge of all these mainstream media companies and what makes them qualified for the job? Well it turns out it’s really not that complicated after all 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/nfZcwdi7b0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Comcast is a family-run business with top shareholders including Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street. It was founded by Ralph J Roberts and Julian a Brodsky, both graduates of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Ralph's son is now the chairman and CEO of Comcast. The speaker also mentions Brian, who graduated from the Wharton School and is in charge of Comcast. The speaker notes that the board of directors of Comcast lacks media experience, but NBC News, which is owned by Comcast, has its own board. The speaker questions the connections between these individuals and their roles in the media industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I just found out that Comcast is a family run business. You know, the Comcast that bought MSNBC and that whole media conglomerate, Technically, they're a publicly traded company and their top shareholders are Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street. But they were founded by Ralph J Roberts, who served as the CEO for 40 takes years. Roberts graduated from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. It was cofounded by Julian a Brodsky, who also graduated from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Interesting. And now Ralph's son is the chairman and CEO of Comcast. Hence, why it's kinda like a family run business. And Brian also well, he went to the University of Pennsylvania, but there it is. We check his Comcast bio, graduated from the Wharton school at the University of Pennsylvania. We will come back to this in just a second because I couldn't help but notice on this dude's Wikipedia page that there's a whole section for this thing called the Maccabiah Games or however you say it, which he's been competing in for decades, at least since 1981. Holy shit, bro. And he goes and competes in the Jewish squash Olympics every 3 or 4 years. Just in case you were wondering what MSNBC thought of that thing happening over there. The Wharton School pops up all the time. So I'll real quickly tell you why I mention it when I do. See, the military industrial complex and the intelligence agencies, they need to recruit from somewhere. Right? And they do it from private Ivy Ivy League Universities, like the Harvard Kennedy School, like the Wharton School. So I'm not saying that everyone that graduated from places like Wharton are necessarily connected to intelligence and, you know, sketchy things. I'm just saying that it's worth noticing. But anyways, Comcast, family run media business And Brian is in charge and media runs in the family. It's in his blood. And it's a damn good thing too because when you look at the board of directors of Comcast, you'll notice really quickly that none of them have experience in media at all. We got a lot of experience with, like, shitty insurance companies and real estate and hotels and resorts and more real estate, the Federal Reserve. We got bankers. We got chemical companies that will poison your kids. Oh, we got more bankers. They've got experience bottling soda and making spices to sell you for cheap, running cruise lines, more real estate, frying chicken and making Taco Bell. But that's the whole board. That's literally it. Like, on the board of Comcast, Brian is the only one with a significant amount of media experience in his background. But it's not such a big deal because Comcast is just the parent company and like the news company like NBC News, that's below Comcast, and they have their own board. And it's all good because Seysad is in charge of NBC Universal News Group, and I'm sure he's got it covered. See, here's his bio. And when we read it, We find out that he's got experience in banking and Walmart and PepsiCo, and he's on the Council of Foreign Relations and the Aspen Institute. And wait for it, he graduated from the Wharton School at UPenn. Sure are a lot of coincidences out there. It almost makes you wonder, why are these people in charge of the giant media company that's in charge of the news? It's probably nothing, though.
TheReal40_Head
Posted - February 12, 2024 at 6:30 AM
Saved - February 13, 2024 at 4:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and media groups The Federalist and The Daily Wire have filed an injunction against the U.S. government to halt a taxpayer-funded program that censors media reports exposing government corruption and attacks on free speech. The lack of mainstream media coverage on this issue is concerning. Paxton vows to continue fighting until the censorship-industrial complex is dismantled. This development aligns with a QAnon post from February 7, 2020, highlighting the control over media and its impact on society.

@TheReal40_Head - 40_Head

MASSIVE NEWS from Texas that seems to have become the victim of the very Biden administration program that Texas is battling against. There is very little mainstream media coverage talking about this! The story appears to have basically been blacklisted. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and co-counsel The New Civil Liberties Alliances, along with two media groups, The Federalist and The Daily Wire, are seeking to halt the censorship-industrial complex; a taxpayer-funded program created to censor the media. Paxton filed an injunction against the U.S. government on February 7th. But nobody seems to know about it! Paxton and his allies are targeting Biden's program that is directed to silence any media reports (or social media posts) that attempt to expose the government's corruption and communist style attacks on Constitutionally protected free speech. “Every last person involved in the illegal conspiracy to use the power of government to trample our First Amendment rights better buckle up, because we are not going to stop until the entire censorship-industrial complex is on the ash heap of history.” And what do you know? It just so happens to parallel a major 4 year delta from February 7th, 2020. "3838 Feb 07, 2020 12:04:23 AM EST Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 Control over the media has kept people in the dark. Control over the media has kept people at heel (behind). Control over the media has kept people focused on falsehoods. Control over the media has kept people in a constant state of fear. Control over the media has divided our Republic into segments: >Race >Religion >Class >Political Affiliation >Gender [weaponized] When a citizenry is divided they have no 'collective' power. When a citizenry has no 'collective' power they can no longer control the levers that govern them [levers of control]. [illusion of democracy] Q" https://dallasexpress.com/national/paxton-files-injunction-to-stop-biden-news-censorship/?fbclid=IwAR1YkWrdSF8M_pbxkPvfL4GFesV5ujQ-TJ3Zgfly0RtLn_ZSle3vNweYtjc_aem_Ae-Pmlg6l7QcX9CBYOQOvIrXRQq1exQTPUxLHin26QBhI5TenGbPGoH116g7RAzkKGw

Paxton seeks order against Biden administration to halt government-funded media censorship Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, along with two media groups, is seeking to halt a taxpayer-funded program allegedly created to censor the media.  dallasexpress.com
myhiddenvalue
Posted - April 18, 2024 at 11:54 AM
Saved - April 18, 2024 at 11:36 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

The Rothschild's own the media The 12-minute video also shows when news reporters got caught fabricating stories https://t.co/jGImyqVCL5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses how major news agencies like Reuters and the Associated Press are owned by the Rothschild family, influencing global news. It highlights how media conglomerates controlled by banking families shape public opinion. The transcript also mentions instances of media manipulation, such as NBC fabricating news stories and the influence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) on media and policy makers. The CFR aims for global financial control and includes influential figures like journalists and media moguls. The video raises concerns about the concentration of media power in the hands of a few elite individuals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: World of picture television brings us the news of the world through 2 central news agencies called Reuters and the Associated Press. The Rothschilds bought Reuters in the 1800, which later bought the Associated Press and made the Rothschild family owners of the world's largest central news services. To the present day, the world depends on these Rothschild owned central news services as their main source of news and information. In his book called Who Owns the TV Networks, author Eustace Mullins claims that the major TV networks, radio stations, newspapers, and publishing empires are controlled by the Rothschild, Rockefeller, and JPMorgan money cartels through their corporate conglomerates. The bankster owned media conglomerates include weapons manufacturers General Electric and Westinghouse which profit from promoting wars. Control over the Internet, publishing, recording, and top cable companies can be traced back to the same big five media empires, General Electric, Time Warner, Viacom, Disney, and News Corp. These media monopolies are owned directly or indirectly by the Rothchild, JPMorgan, Rockefeller, and Oppenheimer Brotherhood. Yes. There are now more stations and more media voices, but they're all coming from the same ventriloquist. Every TV show needs corporate sponsors, and corporate sponsors sponsor pro business, pro government programming, and journalists who support the agenda of the big five media owners. While 2 thirds of the world goes hungry, these banksters offer kazillion dollar sponsorships to Speaker 1: issues. Speaker 2: And welcome back to the show. I scream, you scream. You know the rest. Speaker 3: I scream, you scream. You know the rest. Speaker 2: I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I scream, you scream, you know the rest. Well, I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I scream, you scream, well, you know the rest. Speaker 3: I scream, you scream. Speaker 1: Well, you know the rest. I scream, you scream. Speaker 3: Well, you know the rest. Rest. Speaker 4: I scream, you scream. Speaker 3: We all well, you know the rest. Speaker 1: Got Speaker 2: it. I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I scream, you scream, we all know the rest. I scream, you scream, you know the rep. Speaker 3: I scream, you scream, well, you know the rest. Speaker 2: I scream, you scream, you know the rep. Mike Myers says, yeah, baby. Speaker 3: A child's happiness is priceless, especially on a birthday. A child's happiness is priceless, especially on a birthday. In the northeast as more rain continues to fall today. NBC's Michelle Kosinski, I guess she's in the canoe, is in Wayne, New Jersey this morning. Michelle, good morning to you. Speaker 5: Good morning. Well, obviously, we're getting a nice break from the rain, but not the flooding. This is essentially now a part of the Passaic River in this neighborhood. Speaker 2: I just got a picture of the conditions that Caleb Brown has been living in for the past 2 months. Essentially, she was by the neck inside of what would look like a steel cage, roughly 4 by 4 by 6, and that steel cage was then inside of a larger, container. Now a massive search is underway in this field behind me because the victim herself told police that she believes as many as 4 bodies Speaker 0: may be buried here. George? Speaker 6: Boy, that is just horrific. Okay, Lindsey. Speaker 7: An ABC news producer is being investigated by the network after reported evidence that a live camera shot on Good Morning America was doctored by falsely stringing police tape in the background. The shot featured reporter Lindsey Davis in Woodruff, South Carolina where a woman was allegedly held captive in a storage container by a registered sex offender. Behind Davis, yellow police tape can be seen with the words sheriff's line do not cross. A wider photograph of the scene shows that police tape was actually just attached to some ABC camera equipment to enhance the scene. Speaker 1: Dateline NBC, a primetime news program, airs a story in 1992 entitled waiting to explode. The story includes footage demonstrating that a line of trucks produced by General Motors readily explode on impact. Speaker 8: To see for ourselves what might happen in a side impact crash, Dateline NBC hired the Institute For Safety Analysis to conduct crash demonstrations. Unlike GM tests, the fuel tanks were filled with real gasoline. Look what happened. At impact, a small hole was punctured in the tank. According to our experts, the pressure of the collision and the crushing of the gas tank forced gasoline to spew from the gas cap. The fuel then erupted into flames when ignited by the impact in car's headlight. Speaker 1: After the program airs, one of the firemen at the taping of the crash contacts GM. The conversation inspires a full scale investigation. 3 months later, NBC is forced to reveal their role in fabricating the news. Speaker 2: NBC's contractor did put incendiary devices under the trucks to ensure that there would be a fire if gasoline were released from the truck's gas tank. Speaker 4: We said the crash, quote, forced gasoline to spew from the fuel cap, end quote. GM says since the gas cap was the wrong cap for the GM filler tube and because the gas tank was overfilled, the cap came off when the impact occurred. Speaker 2: We agree with GM that we should have told our viewers about these devices. Speaker 4: The Dateline reporter, however, said, quote, at impact, a small hole was punctured in the tank, unquote. GM has now x rayed that tank and found no hole. Speaker 2: We acknowledge the placing of the incendiary devices under the truck was a bad idea from start to finish. Speaker 4: That's our new policy, and we'll be right back. Speaker 6: Look at the pyramid. In the first couple layers, the really eager, hardworking young journalists are out there trying to get the stories, trying to make a name so they can move up that pyramid. Well, the further they move up the pyramid, the more they realize that, you know, the outlets really aren't interested in major news that rocks the boat. Speaker 1: The boat Charles refers to belongs to those at the top of the pyramid where the interests of the media outlets are quietly defined. The year is 1917 and representative Oscar Callaway enters a disturbing statement into the US congressional record. The statement reveals why JPMorgan interests hired 12 high ranking news managers. The 12 were asked to determine the most influential newspapers in America. They were to figure out how many news organizations it would take to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. The 12 found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached. The policy of the papers was bought and an editor was placed in each paper to ensure that all published information was in keeping with the new policy. Soon, that policy would be defined by a front group formed by JP Morgan and his colleagues. In fact, Morgan's personal attorney was founding president of the organization, the Council on Foreign Relations. Today, the CFR maintains that its goal is to increase America's understanding of the world. However, the actual objective of this highly exclusive club is revealed by the rare admissions of the insiders themselves. In the early sixties, a Georgetown University professor collects information for a book favorable to the network of powerful men who founded the CFR. For 2 years, professor Carole Quigley is allowed to examine the confidential papers and secret records of this network. Quigley reveals that these men aim to create a world system of financial control in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. In short, they seek total and quiet control of the entire world, and the CFR is their most visible conduit for carrying out that agenda. CFR members include America's wealthiest tycoons as well as the highly placed elite in government, academic institutions, tax exempt foundations, and the establishment media. Ruling class journalists written by Richard Harwood describes the CFR membership as the ruling establishment in the United States. The Washington Post article boasted that news reporters who are CFR members do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States. They helped make it. Who are these policy makers? Many of their faces are familiar. NBC's Tom Brokaw, CBS's Dan Rather, ABC's Barbara Walters, Jim Lehrer of PBS, William f Buckley of National Review, media mogul Rupert Murdoch, owner of the giant multifaceted news corporation. These media heavyweights and many others like them are members of the CFR. Powerful corporations are also invited to become members. At the close of 20th century, CFR influence presided over far reaching consolidations of media control. In 1995, CFR members Michael Eisner of Disney and ABC's Thomas Murphy merged their media empires. Soon after the merger, the Disney ABC Empire becomes a CFR corporate member. In the year 2000, the world's largest Internet service provider, America Online, joins forces with Time Warner, one of the world's largest news organizations. The CEOs favoring the move are CNN's Thomas Johnson and Time Warner's Gerald Levin, both CFR members. Once again, another media giant is created under the shadow of CFR influence. Today, an elite handful of individuals define the agendas that are supported by the empire of establishment news. Speaker 9: Do you have any people being paid by the CIA who are contributing to a major circulation American Journal. We do Speaker 10: have people who submit pieces to other to American journals. Speaker 9: Do you have any people paid by the CIA who are working for television networks. Speaker 10: This, I think, gets into the kind of, getting into the details, mister chairman, that I'd like to get into an executive
elonmusk
Posted - July 5, 2024 at 3:44 PM
Saved - July 5, 2024 at 8:56 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The legacy media are just propaganda puppets. 𝕏 has the truth.

@theallinpod - The All-In Podcast

The Media is Not Doing its Job @chamath breaks down the viral "sharp as a tack" clip: "Six minutes of 100 spokespeople and proxies, and they all had the same thing to say about President Biden, which is, 'He is sharp as a tack.'" "If I asked 100 people on the street, 'What do you think of @elonmusk?' You'd have 100 different statements. There be a general theme, but you would not have even 50 people repeat the exact same words." "You have this funny situation where 100 different people were basically saying the exact same talking point. So it's not even a point of view. It was just something that they were told to say by somebody else." "And that is the real issue: you don't really have an honest media here. So there is no check and balance on power right now."

Video Transcript AI Summary
A video showed 100 people all saying President Biden is sharp as a tack, questioning if they were told to say that. The speaker points out that if asked about Elon Musk, people would have varied responses, but here they all repeated the same words. This lack of diverse opinions highlights a lack of honest media and a lack of checks and balances on power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you guys see this clip, by the way? 6 minutes of a 100 spokespeople and proxies, and they all had the same thing to say about president Biden, which is he is sharp as attack. Sharp as attack? Which end of attack? The round part? This is a man who is sharp. This is a very sharp president. And the people that I've talked to say he's he's as sharp as a tack. He he's 5. They say he's sharp. You sharp? He's sharp as a tack. If I asked a 100 people on the street, what do you think of Elon Musk? You'd have a 100 different statements. There'd be a general theme, but you would not have even 50 people repeat the exact same words. And so you have this funny situation where a 100 different people were basically saying the exact same talking point. So it's not even a point of view, It was just something that they were told to say by somebody else. And that, to your point, Saks is the real issue, which is that you don't really have an honest media here. And so there is no check and balance on power right now.
elonmusk
Posted - July 14, 2024 at 9:41 PM
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 1:28 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The legacy media is a pure propaganda machine. 𝕏 is the voice of the people.

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

Share 𝕏.com links with your friends who still believe the legacy media. https://t.co/tWs9jIzW2y

elonmusk
Posted - August 21, 2024 at 12:59 PM
Saved - August 21, 2024 at 1:15 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Wow

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

Legacy media is biased and wants to control what you know, which is why citizen journalism is essential. https://t.co/S33NO5vhhD

shellenberger
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 4:19 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 12:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The media's push for more government power to combat misinformation threatens free speech and reveals their desire for censorship, especially after Elon Musk's Twitter acquisition. Countries like Brazil, Canada, and Australia exemplify this trend, seeking to control social media for propaganda. Trust in institutions is eroding due to their failures, and reform or replacement is necessary. The next president must appoint trustworthy leaders in intelligence agencies who support transparency and accountability. A truth-and-reconciliation approach could help restore public trust in government.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The media say we must give the government more power to fight misinformation online. We must not. The only way to fight misinformation is through free speech. What the media really want is the power to censor us. And it's easy to see why: very few Americans trust them. https://t.co/lcC27AcQcL

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

For years, governments and mainstream media corporations worked hand-in-glove to censor social media platforms. After @elonmusk bought Twitter, that changed. Ever since, they've been on the warpath, demanding the power to censor X and demonizing the First Amendment. https://t.co/mbKb9uSbkm

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Brazil, Canada, and Australia show where this is all headed. They are working to shake down social media platforms to pay off mainstream media they control. It's censorship in service of propaganda. Their goal is total control over the information environment

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The media need censorship to maintain their news monopoly. Their brainwashing worked on Democrats from 2016 - 2020. But Democrats' trust has dropped 16 points since 2022. Years of media gaslighting on Covid, Russia, inflation, migration, Biden, laptop, etc. is now backfiring. https://t.co/zpbs9gQWXI

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Trust is declining because our institutions are doing the opposite of their purpose. The media is spreading propaganda and demanding censorship. The FBI, CIA, and DHS are committing crimes. Pediatricians are hurting kids. Universities are silencing scholars.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The bad news is that these trends spell civilizational death. Healthy nations need trustworthy journalists, intelligence and security agencies, pediatricians, and universities. That means there are two options: those institutions must either be reformed or replaced.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Everybody can see the destiny of the mainstream corporate media. Declining Americans trust it and are turning to alternative sources, which is a healthy response. Universities, pediatricians, etc are controlled by trustees and members who can take control or exit and compete.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The next president must replace the heads of our intelligence and security agencies with people who large majorities of the public and both Republicans and Democrats in Congress can trust to be politically neutral and competent.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The new heads of those agencies must publicly proclaim their political neutrality, their cooperation with an independent Blue Ribbon investigation of abuses of power in their agencies, and support the disclosure of state secrets: https://t.co/VIUnWKHMNE

@ScottAdamsSays - Scott Adams

The list of things we are not allowed to know is growing daily. Epstein list Diddy tapes Harris 60 Minutes full video FBI attendees at Jan6 Who owned the coke at the White House UFO stuff JFK assassination files Crooks phone encrypted apps Routh phones What am I leaving off?

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

For such a sweeping investigation and house cleaning to occur, it may need to be a truth and reconciliation-style disclosure, with amnesty granted to lawbreakers. Without that, it's hard to see, from a practical perspective, how significant amounts of disclosure could occur.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The obvious objection to doing so is that it would only further destroy the public's faith in government. If people don't trust the federal government already, why would they become more trusting after they learn of its very many and very ugly abuses of power? https://t.co/DOT5ou8BmX

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The answer is to restore trust. Disclosure and transparency are how the new heads of US intelligence and security agencies win the public's trust. Congress should itself commit publicly to truth-and-reconciliation and demand the same from the new heads of those agencies.

elonmusk
Posted - October 21, 2024 at 12:59 AM
Saved - October 21, 2024 at 7:39 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The legacy media is pure left-wing propaganda

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Soros buys 220 radio stations before the election, gets fast-tracked by the FCC Media: 😴😴This is fine😴😴 Elon Musk gets voters to sign a petition Media: 😡😡JAIL HIM😡😡

JustXAshton
Posted - November 13, 2024 at 3:33 AM
Saved - November 13, 2024 at 10:09 AM

@JustXAshton - Ashton Forbes

“We basically are scribes taking dictation from the right hand of the king. The fourth estate is dead.” Mainstream media is a CIA corrupted institution. https://t.co/7y46Z5rFQb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CIA has admitted to having operatives embedded in major media outlets to influence stories for their benefit. Reports indicate that they have relationships with reporters from various national news organizations, persuading them to alter or withhold stories that could threaten national security. Evidence from the Pike Committee revealed that 42 CIA employees were placed in key media centers, often as national security reporters. A Time Life board member remarked that journalists are merely taking dictation from powerful entities, indicating a loss of journalistic integrity. Some reporters have shared experiences of their stories being spiked by editors, and payments to these operatives were made discreetly, often without proper reporting to tax authorities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this officially was released by the CIA, talking about how they have people embedded in all the major media to change, alter, and affect stories to their benefit. Speaker 1: You are fake news. Speaker 2: So every news, agency, every television radio station in the Albuquerque or Santa Fe area had our snitches in there. So we knew, and we paid them. We paid them good money. One of the good one of the reasons you get to people was you pay them. And, and that was controversial. That that was somewhat controversial. Speaker 0: Do you know of national media that have had some Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. Yeah. I'm not gonna name them. Speaker 0: We now have relationship with reporters from every underlined major wire service, newspaper, newsweekly, and television network in the nation. In many instances, we have persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized our sources and methods. And it goes on to then say that they have the same within academic circles. Speaker 1: There's a a finding that the the Pike Committee made that they they had verified 42 full time central intelligence agency paid employees that were inserted inside the major national news media centers. And most of them ended up being the so called national security reporters. Speaker 0: The man turned to me, and this is a board member of Time Life, and said, doctor Grier, we basically are scribes taking dictation from the right hand of the king. The 4th estate is dead. Speaker 1: I know reporters for Time Magazine who told me specifically that they've provided the stories and their editors have spiked them. Speaker 2: Yeah. The high level producers and directors. Yeah. Speaker 0: And were they how are they paid for the Cash. Speaker 2: Yeah. You pay What you do is you make them sign a form and you tell them, you gotta report this IRS. But whether they do it or not, you you know, you're you're not gonna give your form to IRS. I paid I paid, better not say. There were some of them are large.
cb_doge
Posted - December 9, 2024 at 4:55 AM
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 4:31 PM

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

Remember when media outlets got caught using the same script? It’s a clear sign they’re controlled by the same people. Share this with anyone who believes everything they see on the news, and remind them: legacy media is nothing more than a propaganda machine. https://t.co/pSwFhNvtr2

MatrixMysteries
Posted - July 14, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Saved - August 26, 2025 at 5:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tradition is under attack by industries that benefit from our disconnection and dissatisfaction. Feminism is said to have undermined chivalry, leading to a competitive landscape where average individuals struggle for connection. Masculinity has been redefined as toxic, weakening societal structures. Identity politics create division, while the celebration of unhealthy lifestyles distracts from real issues. Climate change narratives serve economic interests, and Big Pharma profits from managing rather than curing illness. Education and media perpetuate control, shaping perceptions rather than informing.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

“Tradition didn’t die. It was murdered—by industries that profit from you staying sick, single, and spiritually lost.” – G.K. Chesterton A Thread Exposing the Weaponized Lies and Propaganda We’ve Been Sold🧵 1. Feminism Killed Chivalry https://t.co/QX4Rq00nN1

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

Chivalry Is Dead, and Women Killed It 🔹 Feminism told women they didn’t need men. Social media showed them they could replace them. The sexual marketplace went global overnight. Average women now compete for the top 10% of men, and average men get left behind. Chivalry didn’t stand a chance — you can’t open doors in a world that values status over substance. 🔹 It wasn’t about equality. It was about exposure. Social media gave women unlimited options and men unlimited rejection. The result wasn’t liberation. It was inflation — of egos, expectations, and loneliness.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Do we need men? No. No? We don't need short men. Oh god. Do we need men to make us stupid? Do women need men in this world? Do we need men? We can be strong independent women. Nobody needs men. Really? We do not need men. Why not? Why do we need men? We don't want men. Why? Yeah. You do need women. Because they're beautiful. Women make us feel compassionate and affectionate. Do we need women? Of course, we do. Do we need women? Yes. Why? Because they're hot. I mean, shit. Unless you're gay. Who's gonna do my dishes?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Need men? Speaker 1: What the fuck? Speaker 0: Do we need men? No. Speaker 1: Do we need men? No. No? We don't need short men. Speaker 0: Do you need a man? No. Need a man? Speaker 1: Oh god. Speaker 0: Do you need a man? Speaker 1: No. Do Speaker 0: we need men? No. Why? Speaker 1: I don't know. Speaker 0: Do we need men? No. No? Do we need men? Speaker 1: Do we need men to make us stupid? Speaker 0: Do we need men? Do we need men? Do women need men in this world? Do we need men? Speaker 1: I don't know. Why? Because Speaker 0: we can be strong independent women. Do we need men? Speaker 1: Not necessarily, but, like, if I can look at them, like, we need a man to look at. Do we need men? Speaker 0: No. Why? Nobody needs men. Really? We Speaker 1: do not Speaker 0: need men. Speaker 1: Why not? Why do we need men? We don't want men. Why why would I need men? Speaker 0: So what do you Speaker 1: what what can you get Speaker 0: from someone else that you don't get from a man? Speaker 1: The only thing I can Speaker 0: get from a man that Speaker 1: I can't get anyone else anywhere else is Okay. Speaker 0: And I don't need Do we need women? Yes. Speaker 1: I'm doing. Why? These women Speaker 0: are awesome. Do we need women? Of course. Speaker 1: Why? Yeah. You do need women. Because they're beautiful. Speaker 0: Do we need women? Speaker 1: Women make us feel compassionate and affectionate. Do we need women? Of course, we do. Speaker 0: Do we need women? Yes. Why? Because they're hot. And what else? They're hot. Do we need women? Speaker 1: I mean, shit. Unless you're gay. Speaker 0: Do we need women? Speaker 1: Do we need women? Yeah. Yes. Who's gonna do my dishes?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Men don't have a say in women's sex life. Do you think the sexual empowerment of women in any way contributes to their own objectification? No. Does the fact does the fact that porn and OnlyFans exist prove that women are okay being objectified as long as they're getting paid. No. It means that we can use our body the way that we want to without men's control. Do you consider sex work to be real work? Yes. Yes. And if you don't, you suck. Why are women more accepting of women who can sell sex but are less likely to accept a man who can buy it? Because it's empowering to be able to do what you want with your body when you want to be able to do it. Because it's my fucking body. Body mind choice. My body
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Men don't have a say in women's sex life. Speaker 1: Do you think the sexual empowerment of women in any way contributes to their own objectification? No. Does the fact does the fact that porn and OnlyFans exist prove that women are okay being objectified as long as they're getting paid. Speaker 0: No. It means that we can use our body the way that we want to without men's control. Speaker 1: Do you consider sex work to be real work? Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. And if you don't, you suck. Speaker 1: Why are women more accepting of women who can sell sex but are less likely to accept a man who can buy it? Speaker 0: Because it's empowering to be able to do what you want with your body when you want to be able to do it. Speaker 1: But isn't that like shaming your own customers? No. Well, how can you be a victim of your own product? Speaker 0: Because it's my fucking body. Body mind choice. My body

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

2. The War on Masculinity 🔹 Strength was never the threat — but strong men were. So masculinity was rebranded as toxic, fatherhood as optional, and leadership as oppression. Boys were medicated. Men were silenced. And the world was told to celebrate their absence. 🔹 A society without strong men is easier to steer. Masculinity had to be dismantled — not for equality, but for compliance. When protectors fall, predators thrive. And in the vacuum, the state becomes father, protector, and god.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Normalized guys wearing nail polish, crop tops, honestly, any clothes they want, dresses, skirts, whatever. Speaker 1: Life's too short to exercise. I'm just gonna be honest. There are so many better things to do than exercise. And this way of thinking is known as fatphobia. Speaker 2: A fat fucking den. Speaker 1: Men are not meant to be dominant. Men are meant to be submissive. Speaker 2: At nighttime, that hurt. You know? Speaker 1: And I think that just that flipped the switch in me where I was like, okay, fuck you. Watch this.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Normalized guys wearing nail polish, crop tops, honestly, any clothes they want, dresses, skirts, whatever. Speaker 1: Life's too short to exercise. I'm just gonna be honest. There are so many better things to do than exercise. And this way of thinking is known as fatphobia. Speaker 2: A fat fucking den. Speaker 1: Men are not meant to be dominant. Men are meant to be submissive. Speaker 2: At nighttime, that hurt. You know? Speaker 1: And I think that just that flipped the switch in me where I was like, okay, fuck you. Watch this.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

3. The Fragmentation of Identity 🔹 Identity politics replaced unity with division — turning shared humanity into niche categories. You were taught to see yourself through race, gender, and labels before seeing yourself as a person. Victimhood became currency. And the more fragmented you became, the more powerful the system grew. 🔹 This wasn’t empowerment. It was distraction. While people fought over pronouns and flags, real power structures stayed untouched. Confusion became control. The more lost you are, the easier you are to lead — and the harder you are to rebuild.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We know he's good, God, and he no longer could be here. We honor his legacy. We're not briating it, God. We're not shaming anybody, God. We're just humbling ourselves before you. Yes, Lord. You brought the thunder and rain today, God.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We know he's good, God, and he no longer could be here. We honor his legacy. We're not briating it, God. We're not shaming anybody, God. We're just humbling ourselves before you. Yes, Lord. You brought the thunder and rain today, God.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

4. The Celebration of Obesity 🔹 What began as body acceptance became a shield for dysfunction. Health was framed as vanity. Discipline as oppression. Gluttony was rebranded as empowerment. And anyone who promoted self-control was labeled a threat to progress. 🔹 This wasn’t compassion. It was control. A population that normalizes illness is easier to pacify, easier to profit from, and easier to keep numb. The food stays poisoned. The body stays broken. And the lie is sold as self-love — because truth doesn’t sell nearly as well.

Video Transcript AI Summary
- What I'm hearing is this intense discussion around self hatred and when you're in a bigger body. - I wanted to ask you, your you who's 20, is your life better? Are you happier? Is everything better now that you're slightly smaller than you were before? - Absolutely. And I'm not a little bit smaller. I'm a lot smaller. I did do research into everything. - I can still have kids, and that may not have happened if I had to stay the size I was. - My question to you is, can you honestly say that you are a 100% happy and healthy? Like, you have no medical conditions whatsoever. You have no problems at all with your health. - I think it's really interesting that I feel like I need to justify my existence in this room. - No. You asked her to justify her decision. I said she was happy. - I didn't ask her to justify what her health issues now or if there is any. - But have you got any health issues? No.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I'm hearing is this intense discussion around self hatred and when you're in a bigger body. And I wanted to ask people down the front there, your you who's 20, is your life better? Are you happier? Is is everything better now that you're slightly smaller than you were before? Speaker 1: Absolutely. And I'm not a little bit smaller. I'm a lot smaller. I did do research into everything. I can still have kids, and that may not have happened if I had to stay the size I was. My question to you is, can you honestly say that you are a 100% happy and healthy? Like, you have no medical conditions whatsoever. You have no problems at all with your health. Speaker 0: I think it's really interesting that I feel like I need to justify my existence in this room. No. But hang on a minute. You asked her to justify her decision. I said she was happy. I didn't ask her to justify what her health issues now or if there is any. Speaker 1: But have you got any health issues? No.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Just because I'm fat, that doesn't invalidate the things that I say. "She died." The statement is followed by a provocative prompt: "You ready to get super sized?" "She died too." The sequence continues with a shift in tone: "Today, I've got the big Fruit Loops." "He's dead." The closer invites listeners: "Join me on my fat positive radio show, which didn't last long because she died."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just because I'm fat, that doesn't invalidate the things that I say. She died. You ready to get super sized? She died too. Today, I've got the big Fruit Loops. He's dead. Join me on my fat positive radio show, which didn't last long because she died.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

5. The Hoax of Climate Change 🔹 Climate change isn’t a crisis — it’s a business model. The narrative was weaponized to sell carbon credits, impose green taxes, and push endless “solutions” that enrich the few while burdening the many. 🔹 Behind every doomsday headline is a motive — political, economic, or both. The goal was never to save the planet. It was to sell fear, restrict freedom, and manufacture obedience under the guise of moral responsibility.

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's not science. It's politics. I've been listening to this bullshit for fifty years. In the sixties, it was oil will be gone in ten years. In the seventies, it was another ice age in ten years. In the eighties, it was acid rain will destroy all the crops in ten years. In the nineties, it was the ozone layer will be destroyed in ten years. In the February, it was the glaciers will all melt in ten years. In the twenty tens, it was the East And West Coast will be underwater from rising sea levels in ten years. None of this fear mongering nonsense came true, but it did result in higher taxes every time.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not science. It's politics. I've been listening to this bullshit for fifty years. In the sixties, it was oil will be gone in ten years. In the seventies, it was another ice age in ten years. In the eighties, it was acid rain will destroy all the crops in ten years. In the nineties, it was the ozone layer will be destroyed in ten years. In the February, it was the glaciers will all melt in ten years. In the twenty tens, it was the East And West Coast will be underwater from rising sea levels in ten years. None of this fear mongering nonsense came true, but it did result in higher taxes every time.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

6. The Business Of Big Pharma — “A Patient Cured Is a Customer Lost” 🔹 The pharmaceutical industry isn’t built to cure disease — it’s built to monetize it. Real healing ends the cycle of profit, so treatments are designed to manage symptoms, not eliminate them. 🔹 Natural remedies and root-cause solutions are dismissed, discredited, or banned — not because they fail, but because they can't be patented. The goal was never your health. It was lifelong dependency — and it's worth billions.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I don't know what happened in 1990. There was no plague that was killing children that we had tripled the amount of vaccines." "Happened after 1989? The vaccine schedule. Born to 26 more vaccines. Agreed. Are all of them absolutely necessary?" "They wanna make money." "It's twice as many as anywhere else in 30 countries in the Western world. But We give twice as many shots as any of those countries." "Should you educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life?" "I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know what happened in 1990. There was no plague that was killing children that we had tripled the amount of vaccines. Speaker 1: Happened after 1989? The vaccine schedule. Born to 26 more vaccines. Agreed. Are all of them absolutely necessary? They wanna make money. Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 1: It's twice as many as anywhere else in in 30 countries in the Western world. But We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that? Well, what what are you against? Don't vaccinate for this, but vaccinate for that? Yes. I think we have to choose which is absolutely necessary. Speaker 0: Should you should educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life? Speaker 1: I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time. Excellent. Parents have to take have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. They have to look at the information. Speaker 0: Space out the vaccines. Delay them till after one. Clean out the toxins that are in them. We don't need that many. Speaker 1: Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save that could save a life or prevent a disease? I don't I don't understand. I The AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical schools are financed by the drug companies. This is a huge business. Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13,000,000,000 Speaker 0: They control medical schools. Speaker 1: What we are asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
Video Transcript AI Summary
'The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel's drugs and keep taking them over and over.' This describes a movie concept in which cartels unite to control media and politicians to force global lockdowns via drug dependence. 'I threw the script away.' 'I mean, who is gonna believe that crazy idea?' The speaker presents this premise as the movie concept, followed by remarks. The remarks reflect the speaker's reaction.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So the movie goes like this. The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel's drugs and keep taking them over and over. I threw the script away. I mean, who is gonna believe that crazy idea?

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

7. The Illusion of Sexual Liberation 🔹 They told you it was natural, healthy, even empowering — a safe outlet in a digital world. But porn didn’t liberate desire. It hijacked it. It rewired your brain, numbed your instincts, and trained you to crave pixels over people. 🔹 This wasn’t about freedom. It was about control. A distracted, desensitized population doesn’t build families, lead communities, or challenge systems. Porn was never just a product — it was a weapon. And it’s being used on you.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

8. School: Still Running on the same 100-Year-Old Blueprint 🔹 School was designed for efficiency, not growth. A system built to mass-produce workers — not develop minds. Bells told you when to move. Desks told you where to sit. Silence was rewarded. Questions were discouraged. It wasn’t education. It was conditioning. 🔹 Real-world skills were replaced with memorized facts. Creativity was punished. Curiosity was standardized. You weren’t educated — you were processed. And the system worked exactly as intended: it prepared you for a job, not a life.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I did some investigation into the derivation of the American public education system and found out that it was based on the Prussian model. And the Prussians produced a universal education system in the late eighteen hundreds because they were afraid they were losing military superiority, and they wanted to produce a cadre of mindless obedient soldiers. That was expressly the purpose. And then that model was adopted by prototypical fascists in The US, again in the late eighteen hundreds. This is before Mussolini and all of that time. Corporate types mostly who wanted to produce cadres of obedient workers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I did some investigation into the derivation of the American public education system and found out that it was based on the Prussian model. And the Prussians produced a universal education system in the late eighteen hundreds because they were afraid they were losing military superiority, and they wanted to produce a cadre of mindless obedient soldiers. That was expressly the purpose. And then that model was adopted by prototypical fascists in The US, again in the late eighteen hundreds. This is before Mussolini and all of that time. Corporate types mostly who wanted to produce cadres of obedient workers. And that's why the desks are in rows, and that's why there's factory bells, and that's why it's top down leadership. What was really stunning about that wasn't only that that was the model, but it's it's worse than that because the people who built the schools were consciously aiming at eradicating the will of the students who were part of the system because they wanted them to be obedient.
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a lot of people that think that because they're bad at school or because they're not interested in school that they're destined to be a loser. And that's not true. The problem with school is too rigid. Like, public school system sit down, under employed underpaid teacher, disinterested, not really connected with the work. You're not connected with it. You just can't wait to go home and do what you like to do. Exactly. And you get this thought in your head like, oh my god. I'm gonna be a loser. I mean, that's how I was when I was in high school. I thought I was gonna be a loser.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a lot of people that think that because they're bad at school or because they're not interested in school that they're destined to be a loser. Yeah. And that's not true. You you can the problem with school is too rigid. Like, public school system sit down, under employed underpaid teacher, disinterested, not really connected with the work. You're not connected with it. You just can't wait to go home and do what you like to do. Exactly. And you get this thought in your head like, oh my god. I'm gonna be a loser. I mean, that's how I was when I was in high school. I thought I was gonna be a loser.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

9. The Mainstream Media Propaganda Machine 🔹 The mainstream media doesn’t report news — it manufactures consent. Owned by a handful of corporations, it doesn’t inform the public. It shapes perception to serve power. 🔹 Stories are framed, facts are filtered, and dissenting voices are erased. The goal isn’t to keep you informed — it’s to keep you aligned. Not with the truth, but with the approved version of it.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

Thanks for reading. If you found value in this thread, retweet the first post and follow for more: @MatrixMysteries Want deeper dives and exclusive content? Consider Subscribing — more truths, fewer filters. https://t.co/Jn3EWqBufH

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

“Tradition didn’t die. It was murdered—by industries that profit from you staying sick, single, and spiritually lost.” – G.K. Chesterton A Thread Exposing the Weaponized Lies and Propaganda We’ve Been Sold🧵 1. Feminism Killed Chivalry https://t.co/QX4Rq00nN1

EndWokeness
Posted - July 20, 2025 at 6:36 PM
Saved - July 21, 2025 at 5:02 PM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Future historians studying the demise of the media should study this video https://t.co/FUfJKCglUH

officialmcafee
Posted - August 30, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Saved - September 1, 2025 at 6:40 AM

@officialmcafee - John McAfee

The media has been the mouthpiece of the government most likely from its inception. They feed us their lies by way of our favored news channels, and we gobble it up without a second thought. When will we learn? When will enough be enough? When will we wake up? https://t.co/gxvMieBf3w

Video Transcript AI Summary
"We need to talk about how the media is the mouthpiece of the US government." "This man was over six feet tall, and we're expected to believe that he himself from a bunk bunk that is five and a half feet tall." "However, it has to be with enough force to break his neck in multiple places in ways which are indicative of a person being violently strangled." "unbelievable coincidences of his cellmate being moved out of his cell just hours before his death." "The cameras are conveniently located so that nothing records anything in that area." "The guards that are supposed to be guarding him were told to go home because there's maintenance happening." "This is your fucking life and your kids and your families. Wake up."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to talk about how the media is the mouthpiece of the US government. How it is visible everywhere and yet invisible because of its subtlety. But sometimes, it's not quite so subtle. Let's give an example. Very recent, and it's still on everyone's mind. The death of Jeffrey Epstein. Now this man was over six feet tall, and we're expected to believe that he himself from a bunk bunk that is five and a half feet tall. That is maybe on his knees and just leans forward and himself. However, it has to be with enough force to break his neck in multiple places in ways which are indicative of a person being violently strangled. Now, let's add to that the unbelievable coincidences of his cellmate being moved out of his cell just hours before his death. No witnesses in the cell. The cameras are conveniently located so that nothing records anything in that area. The guards that are supposed to be guarding him were told to go home because there's maintenance happening. Add to this, he had said someone is trying to kill me. And all of the other inmates are saying he was well adjusted and nowhere near Please God, people, we know it was not. And yet, and yet, as soon as the official report comes out, suddenly it's the media says it's as if god shed some magnificent light of truth that we all now are happy with. Please god, see what is happening here. This is your fucking life and your kids and your families. Wake up.
View Full Interactive Feed