reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - June 25, 2024 at 11:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Child soldiers trained by the "AZOV Battalion" in Ukraine, funded by the government, are a horrifying reality. The international press remains silent. The Ukrainian military has terrorized the Russian population in Donbas for 8 years, but the world turns a blind eye. Ukrainian neo-Nazis, paid by the government, have been killing innocent Russians since 2014. Putin is protecting his people from violent attacks by Ukrainian neo-Nazis. The deaths of innocent Russians in Donbas receive no attention compared to the deaths of Ukrainians.

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

THE HORROR in Ukraine that the international press is not talking about: child soldiers trained on the model of ISIS! Military training of children affiliated with "AZOV Battalion", a group of Nazis operating in Ukraine for many years, encouraged & funded by the gov-t. #Ukraine https://t.co/AgG2AR6iFP

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

https://t.co/oLW9cAKBoj

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

https://t.co/qj3h6n5VRJ

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

🇷🇺 Stories Of Suffering Russian population Of Donbas has been terrorized by The Ukrainian military for the last 8 years. The world has been silent. WAKE UP!!! Enough with the one-sided Western bias stories. There are two sides. Always. #UkraineRussianWar #Ukraine https://t.co/XnjylSXFe8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the impact of war on their lives in Avdiivka, Ukraine. They describe the fear and destruction caused by shelling, with Speaker 1 recounting the loss of a child's finger. They express frustration towards the conflict and the lack of truth being told. Speaker 0 blames the Ukrainian army for the violence, while Speaker 1 criticizes those who have surrounded Avdiivka. They both long for peace and hope for an end to the war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Как живешь? Как что? Speaker 1: Что это Speaker 0: у тебя такое? Это глад. Прилетел, да? -Да. Speaker 1: -Только первый грохот, я не знаю с какой стороны мы услышали. Я говорю давай бежать. Speaker 0: Всю ночь в сторону долга. Прям ракеты перелетали. Я теперь поняла, как сердце Борис. Я сидел рядом с окном и раз, у нас налетел снаряд. Мы добежали до двери и все начало сыпаться. А там мои осколки попали кистью. Speaker 1: Когда всё развеялась, вяжу тут лежит сын, мой мама, тут лежала, тут свекровь бежала на этих воронках, а там дедушка на шноте лежал я детей похватала побежала с ними подвал а когда уже в подвале посветила фонариком увидела что у ребенка нет пальца Speaker 0: вчера когда его выносила он мне говорил: Мама, я ведь только начал жить, за что? Я когда увидела маму с папой обижаешь Мне было страшно. Чисто было страшно смотреть на Speaker 1: фиг скажите пожалуйста почему вы никогда не говорите правды Speaker 0: это не днр нас убивает Speaker 1: а вот эти фашисты, которые окружили Speaker 0: нашу Авдеевку. Ярошенко хочет армии, и он не понимает, что такое мир. Я допустим, завтра это все закончится и не будет войны в Париже никогда, никогда, никогда, никогда.

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

https://t.co/E6jWPB4wh3

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

Ukrainian neo-Nazis are violent gangs of bandits. They've been killing innocent Russians in Ukraine in violent attacks since 2014. They are paid by Ukrainian gov. It's a fact. Research. Yes this footage is from a few years ago. The status quo remains however. #UkraineRussianWar https://t.co/g0QKlAL6Px

Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Militia, linked to the far right group ASOV, has been causing chaos in Ukraine. They have clashed with police, trashed locations, and have ties to racist beliefs. The group's founder, Andrei Biletsky, has expressed anti-Semitic views. They have also been involved in political activities, such as disrupting city hall meetings. Ukraine's interior minister, Arsen Abakov, has close connections to the Azov group, employing their fighters and appointing their commander as his deputy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the National Militia when journalists aren't watching. We're given other footage, which shows more places being trashed, men lighting fireworks indoors, even setting one location on fire. The national militia tell us they're working alongside the police, but they have also, on several occasions, fought them. Here, they brawled and used pepper spray on officers. The national militia are part of a group called ASOV. Initially, a volunteer military battalion, it has well established links to the far right. Its founder, this man, Andrei Biletsky, has in the past expressed racist and anti semitic views. Its logo has clear Nazi overtones. Speaker 1: My favorite quote, from Andrei Beletsky is that, the destiny of the Ukrainian nation is to be in avant garde in holy war of white people against underhumans led by Semites. Speaker 0: The national measure have already been flexing their muscles in Ukrainian politics. This is the city hall in the town of Cherkassy. Look at it now. All around the outside are security officers. And the reason the police have come is because at the last session, this happened. The national militia, together with some war veterans, turned up and stood among the deputies, announcing that no one would leave until the mayor's budget was passed. This is him, Arsen Abakov, Ukraine's ambitious interior minister. His links to the Azov group are well known. He's put their fighters on the payroll of his ministry and appointed one of their commanders, Vadim Troyan, as his deputy.

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

https://t.co/EMhhPOZoNN

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

It's important to understand TWO sides of the story. Putin is doing his job - he is protecting his people from violent attacks from neo-Nazis of Ukraine against peaceful people of Donbas since 2014. Ukrainian gov snubbed him for years refusing to negotiate. #UkraineRussiaWar https://t.co/WR7YRBMplJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Денацификация? У нас есть радикалы, но они не в правительстве. Может быть, есть придурки с свастикой, но не на правительственном уровне. У нас нет тысяч людей с факелами, как в Германии в 30-е годы. Но в других странах это есть и поддерживается. De-Nazification? We have radicals, but not in the government. Maybe there are idiots with swastikas, but not at the governmental level. We don't have thousands of people with torches, like in Germany in the 30s. But in other countries, it exists and is supported.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Денацификация? Вот я с коллегами западными разговариваю: А что такое? У вас тоже есть радикалы. Да, у нас есть, но у нас нет в правительстве радикалов, и все признали, что там есть. Да, может быть, у нас есть какие-то придурки, которые со свастикой где-то бегают, но разве мы поддерживаем это на правительственном уровне? Разве у нас ходят с факелами тысячи людей по столицам или по Москве, либо по другим нашим региональным столицам? Со свастикой и с этими факелами, как в 30-е годы в Германии. Разве это есть у нас? А там есть и поддерживается.

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

Is a death of one human more tragic than of another human? No! How is it fair that the world now gets to see deaths of Ukrainians and is shook (myself included) yet the deaths of innocent Russians in Donbas since 2014 in #Ukraine️ are not talked about and get zero attention?

Saved - June 26, 2024 at 12:02 AM

@whyisso7 - Whyisso

It's important to understand TWO sides of the story. Putin is doing his job - he is protecting his people from violent attacks from neo-Nazis of Ukraine against peaceful people of Donbas since 2014. Ukrainian gov snubbed him for years refusing to negotiate. #UkraineRussiaWar https://t.co/WR7YRBMplJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Денацификация - разговор с западными коллегами. У нас есть радикалы, но они не в правительстве. Есть придурки с свастикой, но не на правительственном уровне. У нас нет массовых шествий с факелами как в Германии в 30-е годы. В других странах это есть и поддерживается. Translation: Denazification - conversation with Western colleagues. We have radicals, but they are not in the government. There are idiots with swastikas, but not at the governmental level. We do not have mass torchlight processions like in Germany in the 1930s. In other countries, this exists and is supported.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Денацификация? Вот я с коллегами западными разговариваю: А что такое? У вас тоже есть радикалы. Да, у нас есть, но у нас нет в правительстве радикалов, и все признали, что там есть. Да, может быть, у нас есть какие-то придурки, которые со свастикой где-то бегают, но разве мы поддерживаем это на правительственном уровне? Разве у нас ходят с факелами тысячи людей по столицам или по Москве, либо по другим нашим региональным столицам? Со свастикой и с этими факелами, как в 30-е годы в Германии. Разве это есть у нас? А там есть и поддерживается.
Saved - July 22, 2025 at 3:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers on the US and NATO's involvement in the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine, highlighting Victoria Nuland's role in various US interventions over the past three decades. The initial post introduces a multimedia perspective on the consequences of US and EU actions in Ukraine, referencing organizations like the CIA and USAID. Subsequent responses provide links to additional content related to these themes, suggesting a focus on the broader implications of foreign intervention in Ukraine's political landscape.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine Victoria Nuland Had a Hand in Every US Intervention in the Past 30 Years Welcome to Nulandistan: A Multimedia Look at What the US and EU Have Unleashed on Ukraine CIA, USAID, NED and a whole host of other US tentacles

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

John J. Mearsheimer in 2015 which nobody listened. "The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path and the end result is that Ukraine is going to get wrecked." #RussiaUkraineCrisis

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine Victoria Nuland Had a Hand in Every US Intervention in the Past 30 Years Welcome to Nulandistan: A Multimedia Look at What the US and EU Have Unleashed on Ukraine CIA, USAID, NED and a whole host of other US tentacles

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine Victoria Nuland Had a Hand in Every US Intervention in the Past 30 Years Welcome to Nulandistan: A Multimedia Look at What the US and EU Have Unleashed on Ukraine CIA, USAID, NED and a whole host of other US tentacles

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Victoria Nuland creates the post-coup government 2014. A leaked discussion of who will be president, pm, ministers of the cabinet, and more. Hard evidence that Ukraine was not a sovereign country when Russia intervened. It is under US occupation through the CIA and the IMF.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine George Soros, Victoria Nuland. Chris Murphy, John McCain, Joe Biden, Geoffrey R. Pyatt

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

⚡Prank with the 43rd US President George W. Bush. Part 1: NATO expansion. The former owner of the White House, being sure that he was talking to the President of Ukraine, spoke about how the United States cynically violated the promise not to expand NATO.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

If anyone has doubts, the war is not Russia 🆚 Ukraine. ⚡Prank with the 43rd US President George W. Bush. Part 2: War of the West against the Russians

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

THE PLANNING OF THE WAR AGAINST RUSSIA A video, filmed during John McCain’s visit to Ukraine in 2016, has resurfaced. It shows the senator accompanied by his colleague and friend, Senator Lindsey Graham, and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

THE PLANNING OF THE WAR AGAINST RUSSIA https://www.voltairenet.org/article217092.html?fbclid=IwAR3ukSv4lnEnOlKumjug_9i0Sz1tJ3vOr2oSvac2U0xINI3-GRYA7idClFM

The secret Ukrainian military programs, by Thierry Meyssan In 2016, the United States committed to arming Ukraine to fight and win a war against Russia. Subsequently, the US Department of Defense (…) [Voltaire Network ] voltairenet.org

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

THE PLANNING OF THE WAR AGAINST RUSSIA https://www.voltairenet.org/article217092.html?fbclid=IwAR3ukSv4lnEnOlKumjug_9i0Sz1tJ3vOr2oSvac2U0xINI3-GRYA7idClFM

The secret Ukrainian military programs, by Thierry Meyssan In 2016, the United States committed to arming Ukraine to fight and win a war against Russia. Subsequently, the US Department of Defense (…) [Voltaire Network ] voltairenet.org

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

⚡⚡⚡ Exactly eight years ago, on June 2, 2014, Lugansk was subjected to a massive air attack. In broad daylight, a Su-25 attack aircraft of the armed forces of Ukraine dropped bombs on the city center, where there was a kindergarten, a square, and residential buildings.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Please note that the leader of the Ukrainian neonazi organisation C14 clearly states "the war we have started" - meaning Ukraine started the war, not Russia. This video is from 5th February 2022. Russia's military intervention started on the 24th February 2022.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

HOW 🇺🇦 WAR BEGAN: 2014. I have been looking for these images for a while but they disappeared from Youtube search. This is how the war in 🇺🇦 started, I think it was the 11th of May 2014. Residents of Mariupol opposed the anti-Russian rhetoric of the CIA installed coup government

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The West's responsibility for the Ukraine war US and its NATO allies played a crucial role in the events that led to the Ukraine War, the result of the West’s (primarily #US) efforts to turn #Ukraine into a Western bulwark on #Russia’s border – Professor John J. Mearsheimer

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Ukraine was not in NATO, but NATO was in Ukraine since 2014 The alliance began training the 🇺🇦 military in 2014 averaging 10 000 trained troops annualy "The US & its allies were effectively turning 🇺🇦 into a defacto memeber of NATO" A lecture by John J. Mearsheimer

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

OSCE Reports Reveal Ukraine Started Shelling The Donbas Nine Days Before Russia's 'Special Military Operation' The Biden Administration, U.S. political officials, and the corporate media are lying the American public into World War III. https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/osce-reports-reveal-ukraine-started

OSCE Reports Reveal Ukraine Started Shelling The Donbas Nine Days Before Russia's 'Special Military Operation' The Biden Administration, U.S. political officials, and the corporate media are lying the American public into World War III. kanekoa.news

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/00FgGfBqvA

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

We would not be where we are, if there not been a bloody anti-constitutional coup d'etat in Kyiv with the direct participation of a number of Western countries. Russia's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/V7r3BtjZMF

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The grandmother who made the mess eight years ago has arrived. The criminal always returns to the scene of the crime. Victoria Nuland sniffed along with Zelensky in Kiev and spewed the following nonsense

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/HuiBprXKzi

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

How USA funded AL Kaida and Ukrainian Nazis Michael Hudson

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/AS0a5sWvBi

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland on Washington's support for strikes on Crimea: "These are legitimate targets. Ukraine strikes at them. And we support it."

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/mFKcWrb6DY

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine Victoria Nuland Had a Hand in Every US Intervention in the Past 30 Years Nuland knew about the far right militias in 🇺🇦, but concealed the fact - French report @elonmusk: "Nobody is pushing this war more than Nuland"

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/kYhMffITpc

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Masterclass ‼️ Scott Ritter: The CIA has been supporting Banderists since 1945 In 2014 CIA, USAID, NED and a whole host of other US tentacles - MAIDAN Coup in Ukraine. Now Zelensky is controlled.

Saved - July 14, 2023 at 2:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden regime's reluctance to engage in peace talks with Russia and the deployment of more US troops can be attributed to Russia's accusations. They claim that Biden's biolab company in Ukraine, Metabiota, is involved in bioweapons production. Russia has presented evidence at the UN, demanding a Security Council investigation into the US biological network in Ukraine. Biden's direct involvement hinders any possibility of peace talks. These labs were initially denied by the media but later acknowledged, though they insist they are not nefarious. Hunter Biden's ownership of a biolab studying coronaviruses adds to the complexity. Billions of dollars in Ukraine and the sacrifice of its people are connected to Russia seeking justice for violations of the Biological Weapons Treaty. The ongoing escalation in Ukraine is seen as retaliation for the US's creation of Covid-19. Russian General Igor Kirillov has previously briefed the public on Hunter Biden's Metabiota and the US Biological network.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

For those wondering why peace talks haven’t happened and why the Biden regime are sending more US troops to Russia; allow me to enlighten you. Russian MIL accused Biden himself of orchestrating bioweapons production via his biolab company operating in Ukraine, Metabiota. Biden cannot allow Ukraine to surrender and he cannot have peace talks with Putin, because Russia have presented evidence at the UN over the past 18 months, of biological weapon production by US funded labs in Ukraine, and Russia have demanded that a stipulation for peace would be a UN Security Council investigation of the US biological network in Ukraine. Biden cannot have this because he is directly involved. Keep in mind these are the same biolabs that the MSM initially said didn’t exist at all, only to then later admit that they do exist, but claim they are totally not nefarious in any way. Hunter Biden just has ownership of a biolab company operating in Ukraine, studying bat coronaviruses BEFORE the pandemic. Nothing to see here. This is why hundreds of billions of your dollars are in Ukraine and why Biden is willing to sacrifice the Ukrainian People down to the last man. Russia want justice for crimes against humanity via violations of the Biological Weapons Treaty, for which the punishment is death. I’ve been telling the world since the jump; Russia’s escalation in Ukraine is backlash for the US creation of C19. Ukraine and Covid are connected. Here is Russian General Igor Kirillov last summer, briefing the public on the US Biological network and Hunter Biden’s Metabiota.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The investment fund Rosemont Seneca, headed by Hunter Biden, is linked to the bio labs in Ukraine. The Russian Defense Ministry also implicates George Soros' Open Society Institute, the Ministry of Defense and Health of Ukraine, and the US Department of Threat Reduction. Rosemont Seneca is connected to MetaBioData and Black and Veatch, major suppliers of Pentagon Bio Lab Materials. Moscow claims these labs are associated with nuclear missile-related institutions and research organizations. The US denies these allegations, stating the labs are for research purposes. Ukraine acknowledges the existence of the labs and is collaborating with the US to prevent research materials from falling into Russian hands.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: United States, in particular, the investment fund Rosemont Seneca, which is headed by Hunter Biden. Speaker 1: Rosemont Seneca Partners is the firm tied to Hunter Biden, the US President's son. And the Russian Defense Ministry is listing, financial entities that are involved in these bio labs in Ukraine. Now, they also listed George Soros' Open Society Institute and Open Society Foundations, which are also involved with them and as well as the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, and the US Department of Threat Reduction. All of them seem to be tied in with these bio labs. And it appears that Rosemont Seneca Partners, the reason that they would be involved is because they have a relationship with MetaBioData and Black and Veatch, which are main suppliers of Pentagon Bio Lab Materials. Now, Moscow is also coming forward and saying that it appears These bio labs are connected, with institutions, and research organizations that are related to nuclear missiles. This is what was said. Speaker 0: The scale of the program is impressive. In addition to the military, the US Agencies For International Development, the George Soros Foundation, And the Center For Disease Prevention Control are directly involved in its implementation. Scientific supervision is carried out by leading research organizations, Including the Los Alamos National Laboratory, which developed nuclear weapons as part of the Manhattan Project. All these activities are carried out under the full control of the Pentagon. Speaker 1: Now the over 30 biolabs are accused by Russia of being involved in weapons development and trying to develop biological weapons. Now The USA denies this and insists they are simply research facilities, and we did hear acknowledgment of these facilities' existence from US under secretary, Victoria Nuland. Speaker 2: Ukraine has, biological research facilities. We are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those Research materials from falling into the hands of, Russian forces, should they
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 1:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The appointment of a person with Jewish roots as the head of Ukraine by Western powers is seen by Putin as a cover-up for the antihuman essence of the Ukrainian state. Putin's actions forced me out of my country, but I am embarrassed for him. How did we Russians allow such a scum to take power?

@k_sonin - Konstantin Sonin

Putin today: "The Western masters placed an ethnic Jew, a person with Jewish roots, at the head of Ukraine and this is how, in my opinion, they cover up the anti-human essence that is the foundation of the modern Ukrainian state." Putin forced me out of my country and put me on the federal wanted list in Russia, but I feel embarrassed for him. And I feel embarrassed that we Russians allowed such a scum to take power.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the presence of Jewish leaders in modern Ukraine and how Western leaders often point out this fact when discussing Russia's involvement in Ukraine. The speaker questions the significance of having Jewish leaders in Ukraine and how it relates to the ongoing situation there.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Как это все кажется с тем что в современную украину со тем что сейчас там происходит возглавляет эт евреи и ведь западные лидеры все время указывают Россию что ну какой же на ук когда вот там еврей я
Saved - October 6, 2023 at 12:01 AM

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Putin just announced that he and his allies are "building a new world" "We have engaged in the creation of a new more fairer world."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Participants of the meeting, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to this special anniversary session of the International Val Club.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Участники плена заседания коллеги дамы господа раз приветствовать тех вас случае на юбилей как уже только что было сказано нашем ведущим двадцатом ежегодно заседании международного клуба вал.
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 7:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin's year-end address is filled with lies and propaganda. He blames the West for the conflict in Ukraine, but even if there was a coup in 2014, it doesn't justify Russia's invasion. Russia's actions to protect pro-Russian populations are not justified, as there are legal avenues to address rights violations. Putin's claims about shelling in Donbas are false, as the conflict started with Russian intervention. Russia's goals in Ukraine do not justify military force. Putin's defense of "demilitarization" is overshadowed by the cost in Russian lives. Russia's arrogance and refusal to compromise will lead to its demise. Putin's description of the conflict as a civil war between brothers is misleading. Russians and Ukrainians have different cultures and values. Russia may weather sanctions, but there are limits to its resilience. The war will end, war criminals will be prosecuted, and international law will be restored.

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Putin tells lies, half-truths, and fantasies at his year-end address. This is propaganda, but it works. So, we must resist and refute each point Here is what he said about Ukraine and the West and why it's wrong 1. Putin blames the West for the war in 2014 and 2022 1/ https://t.co/1ho5T45t1x

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Putin: How did the conflict in Ukraine begin? It began with the state coup in Ukraine in 2014 Let's stop right here. Even if it were a coup in 2014, Russia or Putin has no right to invade and annex any territories. The international law doesn't allow it 2/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

There is the principle of non-intervention. It grants every sovereign State the right of to conduct its affairs without outside interference But of course 2014 wasn't a coup. Pro-Russian president Yanukovych rejected aspirations of Ukrainians to move towards Europe. 3/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Protests followed. Yanukovych ordered to shoot protestors and things unravelled. He fled Ukraine to Russia. Russia invaded and annexed Crimea, then invaded Donbas 4/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

2. Putin claims Russia's actions are justified to protect pro-Russian populations in eastern Ukraine that have suffered for 8 years No, they are not. Even the rights of some part of the population were violated by the government, there are courts, international law, and the UN /

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Violation of any rights of any people doesn't provide Russia or any other country with an excuse to invade another country. 6/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Putin says: They spent eight years shelling Donbas. They forced us to take these actions No, no one shelled anyone in Donbas until Russians appeared there. They started taking over the government buildings, arresting the government officials, shooting people who resisted 7/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Then, the "separatists" somehow got tanks and artillery (from Russia) and the war started. Most of the shelling and shooting happened in 2014-2015, when Russia military and Russian supported irregular militia were fighting Ukrainian regular army. 8/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

3. Putin denies Russia is seeking to encroach on others "We are not creating any blocs. And our friendship is not directed against third countries – it is aimed at benefiting ourselves, but not at harming anyone." 9/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

No one cares if you are creating any blocs or not. What I and others care about is that you use Iranian drones to shoot at my city everyday and that these drones and technology kill my friends 10/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

4. Putin defends the ongoing "special military operation" to achieve Russia's goals of "denazification, demilitarization and neutral status" for Ukraine Putin and Russia can have any goals they want, but they have no right to use military force to achieve them. 11/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

5. Putin claims Russia is successfully "demilitarizing" Ukraine by destroying large numbers of Western-supplied weapons. "We have also destroyed almost 2,300 armoured vehicles of various types. This is what is called demilitarisation." 12/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

I don't know if these numbers are accurate, but the cost of this "demilitarization" is "depopulation of Russia". Putin decision to invade Ukraine has killed over 300 000 Russians according to the US intelligence estimated declassified this week. The loss of tanks is over 2K too /

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

6. Putin warns that Western military aid to Ukraine may end one day: "everything they get is a freebie, and I apologise for such talk. But these freebies may end one day" 13/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

It is true that currently the allies are having a tough time getting its act together. But democracies are stronger than autocracies and while the political process is slow and painful, things will get through If Russia starts winning, the West will mobilize again 14/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

In any case, Russian economy and military is no match to NATO and the West. Putin is delusional trying to argue that Russia is stronger 15/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

7. Putin indicates Russia will dictate the terms of any settlement, not compromise. There is nothing new here. Russia doesn't want to compromise. Most people understand it for now. And this Russian arrogance is the source of its demise. 16/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

8. Putin rules out any second mobilization of troops "So what do we need mobilisation for? There is absolutely no need for it today." To me this speaks of a political vulnerability. Remember that 15K killed in Afghanistan plus the arms race brought the Soviet Union down. 17/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Russia has already lost 300K people in Ukraine and is sanctioned. And Russia today is no match to the USSR. It might have already lost and even dissolved, but we just simply don't know it yet. It is like cancer - it will take time to work its way through. 18/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

9. Putin describes the conflict as a "civil war between brothers", indicating Ukraine should reconcile with Russian domination. "Russians and Ukrainians are essentially one people. What is happening now is an immense tragedy; it is like a civil war between brothers" 19/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

First of all, it is a man made tragedy. This man is Putin. And no Russians and Ukrainians are not the same people. We have different cultures. Russian culture is to tolerate, respect, and obey a cruel tsar. Ukrainian culture is that of freedom and challenge to authority 20/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Russia values the glory of state above the freedom of a human. Ukraine values exactly the opposite. 21/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

10. Putin presents a defiant message that Russia is weathering sanctions and Ukraine cannot defeat it militarily with Western help. "Our main objective is to strengthen sovereignty... economic security and sovereignty... and the growing capability of our security component." 22/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

it is true that sanctions have limited effect and Russia has sufficient resources to continue to fight the war. It is also a scandal that the world continue to trade with Russia paying it 100s of billions enabling the war. But there are limits to the resilience of their economy /

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

One day the war will be over, Ukraine will be peaceful, and the future generations of Russians will be ashamed of the atrocities their parents have committed. The world will prosecute war criminals and the international law will be restored. Let's make it happens sooner! X

Saved - February 5, 2024 at 9:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin has long warned about the US developing ethnic bioweapons and has specifically criticized the US-funded Biolabs in Ukraine for experimenting with bat coronaviruses. Russian military sources claim that Obama, Clinton, Biden, and Soros are the main ideologists behind these alleged crimes against humanity. Supporting Putin and focusing on the Biolabs in Ukraine is seen as a way to hold those responsible accountable.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

This is one of the main reasons they fear Putin. Putin has been warning the world for years about the dangers of the US developing ethnic bioweapons. He has been vocal about the US-funded Biolabs in Ukraine experimenting with bat coronaviruses and creating bioweapons. Putin has also not been shy about who is behind this brazen plot. Russian MIL cite that Obama, Clinton, Biden, and Soros, are the main ideologists responsible for crimes against humanity. This is why I support Putin and care about the Biolabs in Ukraine so much. Because this is our most plausible and direct path to accountability for crimes against humanity.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Former Georgian Minister of State Security expressed concern over the development of drugs that can selectively affect individuals based on their ethnic background. These experiments, allegedly already conducted on animals, have shown rapid changes within two to three generations, altering their original appearance significantly. This poses a significant threat, and it is crucial to establish unified rules of conduct in this sensitive field.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Достоверно. Я видел это заявление бывшего министра госбезопасности Грузии. Безусловно, это вызывает тревогу. Эти разработки, если они действительно проводятся, они очень опасны и связанную с последними достижениями в области генетики. Это значит, что из того, что я видел, Могу только это повторить. О чём там идёт речь? О том, что выявляются какие-то препараты, которые могут влиять избирательно на человека в соответствии с его принадлежностью к определенной этнической группе. И через два-три поколения, а якобы проводятся такие опыты уже на животных, Там же у собак, у крыс цикл достаточно быстрый. Во втором-третьем поколении уже наступают такие изменения, которые просто кардинальным образом меняют первоначальный облик. Вот это, конечно. Если это так, то это представляет большую угрозу. А как бороться? Нужно понимать, все должны понимать: ничто ниоткуда не берётся и никуда не исчезает. Действие равно противодействию, или, точнее, наоборот. Поэтому если кто-то будет разрабатывать такие вещи, то он должен понимать, что и другие будут этим заниматься. Лучше заранее сесть и вырабатывать единые правила поведения в этой чрезвычайно чувствительной сфере.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Ukraine, there were military biological programs experimenting with deadly pathogens like coronavirus, anthrax, cholera, and African pig plague. They are now trying to hide the evidence, but we believe they were creating components for a biological weapon. This poses a direct threat to Russia's safety. Ukraine and their US supporters rejected these claims, but their actions were bold and brazen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Were carrying out military biological programs. They were experimenting with the strength of coronavirus, anthrax, cholera, African pig plague and other deadly lethal pathogens. And now they are trying to more pop the evidence of this program, but we have every reason to believe that next to Russia, in Ukraine, next to Russian borders, they were basically creating components for biological weapon and our numerous warrants of that such developments have pose as direct threat to the safety of Russia. They were rejected by Ukraine and by their patrons from the US, and they did it in a very brazen way.
Saved - February 16, 2024 at 7:57 PM

@ColonelTowner - ColonelTowner-Watkins

This needs to be understood. I’ve read several books on this subject while investigating Operation Gladio and this is in fact the truth.

@FriendsFeisty - Feisty-n-Friends

President Putin addresses the false claim that Ukraine’s Hitler collaborators and present-day national heroes weren’t real Nazis. 🔗 Full transcript https://t.co/SHerO9ag3h

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the historical relationship between Russia and Ukraine, emphasizing that the majority of people in both countries considered them to be essentially the same. However, after World War II, nationalist and Nazi elements fled to the United States and Canada, and eventually came to power in Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The speaker argues that these individuals were aggressive and aligned with fascist ideologies. They were later persecuted by the Germans not because they changed their views, but because they realized Germany was losing the war. The speaker concludes that these individuals remained Nazis and later became neo-Nazis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Мы никогда не делали разницу между русскими и украинцами, между Россией и Украиной. Вообще подавляющее большинство тех, кто жил на Украине и абсолютное подавляющее большинство в России всегда считали это, если по-честному, что-то одно и то же но после Великой Отечественной войны, как мы сейчас говорили часть вот этих националистов и нацистских элементов, которые с Гитлером сотрудничают. Они убежали за границу, убежали в Штаты, в Канаду, и на них противник сделал старт. По сути, после развала Советского Союза именно они и пришли к власти. Даже не важно, какова фамилия была того или иного президента. Шлили себя агрессивно, нагло и все сразу под них и легли. Вы знаете, в литературе становилось хорошо, если история известна. Почему делаются Дафуна Бандеру, религии жизни в Шушкевиче и прочих? Почему? Потому что говорят, что якобы они работали и сотрудничали с фашистами, с неонс нацистами, с гитлеровцами, с Гитлером, добивались независимости Украины, а потом их немцы начали преследовать Так они их начали преследовать не потому что те отказались от своих взглядов, а потому что нос по ветру держали, поняли, что Германия проигрывает войну и начали восстанавливать, пытаться наладить отношения с союзниками Немцы их сразу видели в Сапцах и в лагерях. Так возникла идея, что они вообще не совсем нацисты. Они натуральные нацисты. Сто процентов. И если начали там носом крутить и думать каково еще и тереться не потому что они передумали или изменили свои свои взгляды нет, а потому что поняли, что фашистская Германия проигрывает войну Вот и все Они как были нацистами, так и остались Но их в последующем неонацисты Абсолютно
Saved - March 2, 2024 at 11:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The German Government's actions have caused disappointment and shame. Despite Russia's contribution to defeating Hitler and supporting Germany's reunification, Germany has become an enemy of Russia. The government supports the US proxy war against Russia, provides weapons to kill Russians, and spreads Pentagon propaganda. Germany's moral standards have dropped, and there is a lack of gratitude towards Russia. The Generals are even plotting to attack Russian infrastructure. The call for Olaf Scholz to resign is fueled by the majority's dissatisfaction with the destructive government.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Venting about the dishonor of the German Government: The Soviet Union lost 27m people during WW2 because of the Nazis. The Soviet Union made by far the biggest contribution of the Allied forces in defeating Hitler and eventually granted the reunification of East and West Germany and withdrew over 350,000 troops. Germany and the West broke their promise not to expand NATO eastwards in exchange for reunification yet Russia still provided energy to Germany at a 40% discount allowing its industry to flourish. I am ashamed that Germany is an enemy of Russia today. We did nothing to stop the US coup in Ukraine in 2014. We failed to enforce the Minsk agreements despite being the initiator and mediator. The German Govt is supporting the US proxy war against Russia and provides weapons to kill Russians. We attempted to crush the Russian economy with unprecedented sanctions. The German Govt lies about the war being unprovoked and permits non-stop Pentagon propaganda in the German media. How did we drop our moral standards so low? Where is our shame for having caused so much destruction during WW2? Where is our gratitude to Russia for the reunification of our country and the strengthening of our economy with cheap energy? Why is Germany an accomplice of the evil US empire that has killed over 20 million people in 37 victim nations since WW2? Our Generals are plotting to attack Russian infrastructure with German missiles and our military is sending weapons to Israel, aiding and abetting the genocide in Gaza. How dare you Olaf Scholz? You are a disgrace to any German with integrity. The vast majority is fed up with your destructive Government. Just look at your embarrassing approval ratings. Resign NOW before you do any more damage to Germany. @Bundeskanzler

Saved - March 20, 2024 at 10:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the conflict in Ukraine and the role of various actors, including NATO and the United States. The posts highlight the long-standing tensions and mistakes made by both sides. The focus is on the need for peaceful negotiations and avoiding further escalation. The posts also mention the role of propaganda and misinformation in shaping public opinion. Overall, the posts provide different perspectives on the Ukraine-Russia conflict and its underlying causes.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

MUST WATCH! ENJOY! Piers Morgan vs Jeffrey Sachs What is your view of Vladimir Putin? Well, I think he's very smart, very tough, and I think he says what he means. In 2007, he said, don't do this. At the Munich security conference, famously, he said, all right, you went violating what I know to be true, by the way, which was not an inch eastward for NATO, promised by James Baker II and by Hans-Dietrich Genscher to Gorbachev in 1990. I know that's for sure the case. The United States expanded NATO to Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic in the Clinton period, and then to seven more countries in 2004. Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania and Bulgaria. And then in 2007, Putin said, stop. All right, stop. No more. Not to Ukraine. So what does George W do in 2008? In Bucharest, of course. What does he do? He says, guarantee Ukraine and Georgia. And this is Palmerston's playbook from 1853. So we're going to surround Russia in the Black Sea again. Exactly that. Okay, just to interrupt, though, I just asked you what your view of Putin is, and so far, you've just said he's smart and tough. I told you. Any negatives, professor? I believe that the big mistake of both sides is we should talk this out. And now let me say a word about talking it out. In 2008, when Bucharest happened, european leaders called me because I'm friends with them. They said, what is your crazy president doing, by the way? Some who are in power right now, I won't name names. What is your president doing? Why is he destabilising things? He promised he wasn't going to push Ukraine. That's what european leaders say in private. They don't say it in public. We avoided the negotiations. Then 2014 came, sadly, Piers. I saw some of it firsthand. It was ugly. The United States should not be funding overthrows of governments. We did. I know it. Okay. So I happened to be there soon afterwards with the handpicked government, handpicked by Victoria Nuland. We didn't talk then. Then came the Minsk agreements. And then the United States said privately, even though the UN Security Council has backed both Minsk one and Minsk II, you don't have to do this. And so with Poroshenko. Don't worry about it. Then we heard, of course, Chancellor Merkel say afterwards, yeah, we weren't taking it too seriously, even though Germany and France were the guarantors of that. Then, on December 15, 2021, Putin put it down in a draught. US Russia security agreement. I read it. I called the White House. I said, you know what you can negotiate on this basis? Avoid the war. No. There's going to be no war. Mr. Sachs. I said, just tell them that NATO is not going to enlarge. You'll avoid the war. No, we're never going to say that. We have an open door policy. So. What kind of open door policy? We've had 200 years of the Monroe doctrine. Some open door policy? No, Mr. Sachs. Then the war breaks out. Then immediately Zelensky says, okay, we can be neutral. We can be neutral and negotiations start. As you know, Naftali Bennett, informally, the prime minister of Israel and Turkey with its very skilled diplomacy. I actually flew to Ankara to discuss with the turkish diplomats what was going on. The US stopped the agreement. Why? Because they thought we'll win. We can blade sanctions, you know, cutting them out of the banking system. We're going to bring them to their knees. It's a bunch of terrible miscalculations, is what it is. It's a game. Listen. A terrible game. I hear you. What I'm fascinated by, though, is I've asked you to say what you think of Putin. And so far, like I say, you've only called him tough and smart. This is a guy that kills his political opponents. This is a guy who. This is a guy who rules his country like a gangster. I'm struggling to understand why you can't find any negatives for the guy. He's a dictator. Because I'm trying to find peace, and you don't do it the way that Biden does. Biden said, okay, he's a thug. Biden says he's a crazy sober. That's real good, Joe. That's really getting us to where we want to go. That's hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians dead. Can you not find anything negative to say about Vladimir Putin? I don't think that what I say about Putin negative has anything to do with anything. What I'm saying is, as I know. Well, you were ready to call him smart. You're ready to call him smart and smart and tough, but you can't find anything. I wrote a book about the cuban missile crisis and its aftermath. Kennedy didn't go name calling Khrushchev. He tried to save the world to stop the war afterwards. He didn't insult Khrushchev. What he did was sat down with him and negotiated the partial nuclear test ban treaty. We're not in a game. We're not in name calling. We're not in a cage brawl. We're trying to actually not have the world spiral into nuclear war. So it's not that game. The game is sit down and negotiate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Putin is seen as smart and tough by the speaker, who emphasizes the need for peaceful negotiations rather than name-calling. The speaker criticizes past actions by the US and European leaders regarding Ukraine, urging for dialogue and diplomacy to prevent conflict. The focus is on avoiding war and finding peaceful solutions through negotiation, referencing historical examples like the Cuban Missile Crisis. Peaceful negotiations are emphasized over insults and aggression.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is your view of Vladimir Putin? Speaker 1: Well, I think he's very smart, very tough, and, I think he says what he means. In 2007, he said, don't do this at the Munich Security Conference famously. He said, alright. You went violating what I know to be true, by the way, which was not an inch eastward for NATO promised by James Baker the 3rd and by Hans Dietrich Dencher, to Gorbachev in 1990. I know that's for sure the case. The United States expanded NATO to Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic in, in, the Clinton period, and then to 7 more countries in 2004, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania, and Bulgaria. And then in 2007, Putin said, stop. Alright? Stop. No more not to Ukraine. So what does George w do in 2008 in Bucharest? Of course. What does he do? He says, guarantee Ukraine and Georgia. And, you know, this is, Palmerston's playbook from, 18 53, so we're gonna surround Russia and the Black Sea again. Exactly that. Speaker 0: Okay. But You know I don't want to interrupt. Just to interrupt, though, I just asked you what your view of Putin is. And so far, you've just said he's smart and tough. Speaker 1: I just I told you. He he he Any any negative? Clearly. Speaker 0: Any negative, professor? Speaker 1: I believe that the big mistake of both sides is we should talk this out. And now let me say a word about talking it out. In 2008, when Bucharest happened, European leaders called me because I'm friends with them. They said, what is your crazy president doing? By the way, some who are in power right now, I won't name names, what is your president doing? Why is he destabilizing things? He promised he wasn't gonna push Ukraine. That's what European leaders say in private. They don't say it in public. We avoided the negotiations. Then 2014 came. Sadly, Piers, I saw I saw some of it firsthand. It was ugly. The United States should not be funding overthrows of governments. We did. I know it. Okay. So I happened to be there soon afterwards, with the handpicked government, handpicked by Victoria Nuland. We didn't talk then. Then came the Minsk agreements. And then the United States said privately, even though the UN Security Council has backed both mince 1 and mince mince 2, you don't have to do this. And so with Poroshenko, don't worry about it. Then then we heard, of course, chancellor Merkel say afterwards, yeah, we weren't taking it too seriously even though Germany and France were the guarantors of that. Then on December 15, 2021, Putin put it down in a draft US Russia security agreement. I read it. I called the White House. I said, you know what? You can negotiate on this basis. Avoid the war. No. No. No. There's gonna be no war, mister Sachs. I said, just tell them that NATO was not going to enlarge. You'll avoid the war. No. We're never gonna say that. We have an open door policy. So what kind of open door policy? We've had 200 years of the Monroe doctrine, some open door policy. No. No. No, mister Sachs. Then the war breaks out. Then, immediately, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. We can be neutral. We can be neutral. And, negotiations start, as you know, Naftali Bennett, informally the prime minister of Israel, and the and and Turkey with its very skilled diplomacy. I actually flew to Ankara to discuss with the Turkish diplomats what was going on. The US stopped the agreement. Why? Because they thought we'll win. We can bleed Russia. Our sanctions, you know, cutting them out of the banking system, we're gonna bring them to their knees. It's a bunch of terrible miscalculations is what it is. It's a game. Speaker 0: Listen. Speaker 1: A terrible game. Speaker 0: I hear you. What I'm fascinated by, though, is I've asked you to say what you think of Putin. And so far, like I say, you've only called him tough and smart. This is a guy that kills his political opponents. This is a guy who Yeah. Speaker 1: What's the the Speaker 0: This is a guy who rules his country like a gangster. I I find it I'm struggling to understand why you can't find any negatives for the guy. He's a dictator. Speaker 1: Because I'm trying to because I'm trying to find peace, and you don't do it the way that Biden does. Biden said, okay. He's a thug. Biden says he's a crazy SOB. That's real good, Joe. That's really getting us to where we wanna go. That's 100 of 1000 of Ukrainians dead. Speaker 0: But do you know what? Can you not find can you not find anything negative to say about Vladimir Putin? Speaker 1: I don't think that what I say about Putin negative has anything to do with anything. What I'm saying is, as I know, you Speaker 0: Well, you were already calling smart you were already calling smart and tough. I'm not sure. And that's Speaker 1: You know, in in You go to smart Speaker 0: and tough, but you can't find anything bad. To say that. Speaker 1: Wrote a book about the Cuban Missile Crisis and its aftermath. Kennedy didn't go name calling Khrushchev. He tried to save the world to stop the war. Afterwards, he didn't insult Khrushchev. What he did was sat down with him and negotiated the partial nuclear test ban treaty. We're not in a game. We're not in name calling. We're not in a cage brawl. We're trying to actually not have the world spiral into nuclear war. So it's not that game. The game is sit down and negotiate.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Brilliant!!! The best video @0rf ‼️👏👏👏 Watch Matt Orfalea Bitch Slap Those Who Said The Ukraine Invasion Was "Not About NATO" The biggest threat in the world is NATO. NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. NATO is a military alliance that feeds on war. To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. NATO DISBAND!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin sent a treaty to NATO to stop enlargement, but NATO refused. The conflict isn't about NATO, but democracy in Ukraine. Some compare Putin to Hitler. The main issue is Putin's desire for influence. The war is not about NATO, but Putin's ambitions. It's a complex situation with no easy solution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Putin actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. Speaker 1: So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO across his borders. Flashback. Speaker 0: This is fundamentally not about NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's never about NATO enlargement. It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO expanding toward Russia. This was never about NATO? It's absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism. And it has nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 2: This is not about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not really about NATO. This is not about NATO. Seriously, it's not about Speaker 2: NATO. This was never about NATO. Speaker 3: It was never about NATO. Let's be honest. This doesn't have anything to do with NATO? Speaker 1: Nothing to do with NATO at all. Yeah. He's claiming it's, like, security purposes, but we can see the clear reason. But NATO is not the reason. Speaker 2: This is not about NATO expansion. This is about the democratic expansion. Ukraine bans religious organizations. We are protecting democracy right now. Ukraine is banning political parties. Speaker 1: Because it's a democracy. Speaker 2: Ukraine restricts books and music. It's about democracy. Ukraine won't hold elections. Speaker 1: It's about democracy. And it's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 3: NATO expansion. Speaker 1: Nothing to do with with NATO. It isn't really about NATO. It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO enlargement. In fact, Speaker 2: it has nothing to do with NATO. It's not about NATO encroaching. So it's not about NATO. NATO is just as a fictitious imaginary adversary for for for mister Putin and for Russia. It was never about NATO. Speaker 3: That's not what it's been about. It's been about him trying to expand his sphere of influence. Speaker 4: Hang on. I mean, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine. But if the west had not challenged Russian interests so directly, I think that there there was a chance to avoid this war. Speaker 1: He wanted us to sign Speaker 0: a promise never to enlarge NATO. We rejected that. Speaker 1: The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because of his evil Evil. It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil like president Reagan told. It's about Putin being sick. Speaker 2: Because I don't Speaker 1: know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but nobody negotiated with Hitler. Speaker 2: People were comparing him to Hitler. To Hitler. Speaker 1: And remember Hitler? Speaker 2: He's a Hitler. Speaker 1: We're back when the the Nazis invaded Poland. Speaker 2: This is exactly the same what Hitler was doing to choose. This is the same. Putin will not stop. Speaker 4: Putin Speaker 2: Putin is reminiscent of Hitler. Hitler. This reminds me of Hitler. Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 4: He's the new Hitler. Speaker 1: Who Hitler? This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, just not Ukraine, Syria, all over the place. I hear you. Senator Lindsey Graham, always great to talk to you. Thanks so much. Thank you. Alright. Straight ahead.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Jeffrey Sachs: Conflict in Ukraine has been a 30 year project of the United States. This has been a long standing game, announced, explained Brzezinski laid it all out for us in 1997. MasterClass for Piers Morgan ❗️ Ukraine wanted to be part of NATO and that perhaps the biggest mistake Ukraine made was to give up its nuclear weapons. Well, I think the mistake is that Ukraine should have been a neutral buffer between Russia and NATO. And that's how it started out as an independent state in 1991. And the United States had its eye on getting Ukraine into the US orbit already from 1992. Zbigniew Brzezinski spelled it out in 1997. Many people thought this was a path to disaster and it's turned out to be a path to disaster. So it's very sad. It could have been peaceful and neutral and independent, and that wasn't good enough for the United States. And I understand completely why Russia wouldn't want NATO on the 2000 km border of Ukraine and Russia. So it's just very sad, very predictable. George Kennan called it exactly in 1997. Interestingly, our current CIA director, Bill Burns, who was in 2008, the US ambassador to Russia, sent back a famous memo called Niet means Niet. No, don't do it. It's not just Putin, it's the entire political class that absolutely rejects Ukraine and NATO. And we should have been prudent, but we're not very prudent. We had our designs and we have walked into a disaster. But more than that, we talked Ukraine into a complete disaster. I mean, the other way of looking at this is that Ukraine wanted to be a sovereign, democratic country after the breakup of the Soviet Union. In fact, vast majority of people in Ukraine voted for that and that this was the complete antithesis of how Putin saw the layover of the land and he thought, no, I'm not having that. I'm going to go and grab Crimea, then I'll grab a load of Ukraine, try it in Georgia. I mean, at what point does he do this stuff where even someone who's trying to be fair minded about his intentions, like yourself, might think, I wonder if I'm right and maybe he is just a pathological liar and a homicidal maniac. Piers. The real screw up by the US was not just pushing NATO, but playing real games and participating in the overthrow of Yanukovych in February 2014. We overthrew a government and the United States played a major role in that. I happened to see some of it firsthand. Pretty ugly, but pretty standard stuff. This is what the US does when it doesn't like a government or a government standing in the way. It stirs things up. It puts in a lot of money, it funds unrest, it stokes unrest. And it did that in February 2014. That was really the huge mistake that was a gambit, a typical so called covert, but not very covert US regime change operation. And it was absolutely the path to the disaster that we're in right now. So I think the main point is you have two sides playing a lot of games. But for the United States to be pushing so hard to Russia's border was absolutely premeditated and stupid, really stupid. It got us into this mess, and you could see it coming so clearly for the last ten years. What is your view of I begged the White House many times, avoid the war, stop. Just tell them NATO is not coming, Ukraine will do just fine. And they wouldn't do it because this has been a 30 year project of the United States also. This is how it works. This has been a long standing game, announced, explained Brzezinski laid it all out for us in 1997. So we've seen it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine's decision to give up nuclear weapons and pursue NATO membership is criticized as a mistake. The US is blamed for pushing Ukraine towards NATO and overthrowing Yanukovych in 2014, leading to the current crisis. The speaker urges the White House to avoid war by reassuring Russia that NATO will not expand further. The situation is seen as a result of long-standing US foreign policy goals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine wanted to be part of NATO and that perhaps the biggest mistake Ukraine made was to give up its nuclear weapons. Speaker 1: Well, I think the mistake is that Ukraine should have been a neutral buffer between Russia and, and NATO, and that's how it started out as an independent state in 1991. The United States had its eye on getting Ukraine into the US orbit, already from 1992. Zbig Brozhinski spelled it out in 1997. Many people thought this was a path to disaster, and it's turned out to be a path to disaster. So it's very sad. It it could have been peaceful and neutral and independent, and that wasn't good enough for the United States. And, I understand completely why Russia wouldn't want NATO on the 2,000 kilometer border, of Ukraine and Russia. So it it's just very sad, very predictable. George Kennan called it exactly in 1997. Interestingly, our current CIA director, Bill Burns, who was in 2008, the US ambassador to Russia, sent back a famous memo called the means. No. Don't do it. It's not just Putin. It's the entire political class that absolutely rejects, Ukraine and NATO. And we should have been prudent, but we're not very prudent. We had our designs, and we have walked into a disaster. But more than that, we talked Ukraine into a complete disaster. Speaker 0: I I mean, the other way of looking at this is that Ukraine wanted to be a sovereign democratic country after the breakup of the Soviet Union. In fact, vast majority of people in Ukraine voted for that and that this was, the complete antithesis of how Putin saw the lay of the land. And he thought, no, I'm not having that. I'm gonna go and grab Crimea and I'll grab a load of Ukraine, try it in Georgia. I mean, at what point does he do this stuff where even someone who's trying to be fair minded about his intentions, like yourself, might think, I wonder if I'm right, and maybe he is just a pathological liar and a homicidal maniac. Speaker 1: Piers, the, the real screw up by the US was not just pushing NATO, but playing real games and participating in the overthrow of Yanukovych in overthrow of Yanukovych in February 2014, we overthrew a government, and the United States played a major role in that. I happen to see some of it firsthand. Pretty ugly, but pretty standard stuff. This is what the US does. When it doesn't like a government or a government standing in the way, it stirs things up. It puts in a lot of money. It funds unrest. It stokes unrest, and it did that in February 2014. That was really the huge mistake. That was a gambit, a typical so called covert but not very covert US regime change operation, and it was absolutely the path to the disaster that we're in right now. So I think the main point is you have two sides playing a lot of lot of games, but for the United States to be pushing so hard to Russia's border was absolutely premeditated and stupid, really stupid. It got us into this mess, and you could see it coming so clearly for the last 10 years. Speaker 0: What is your view Speaker 1: about it? The White House. Many I beg I beg the White House many times. Avoid the war. Stop. Just tell them NATO's not coming. You know, Ukraine will do just fine, and they wouldn't do it because this has been a 30 year project of the United States also. This is how it works. This has been a a long standing game, announced, explained. Brozinski laid it all out for us, in 1997. So we've seen it.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The Ukraine - Russian War was planned well in advance. The war in Ukraine will stop when it is stopped by the one who organized it, financed and continues to finance it. This war is provoked and inevitable. Zelensky is a puppet.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

OSCE Reports Reveal Ukraine Started Shelling The Donbas Nine Days Before Russia's 'Special Military Operation' The Biden Administration, U.S. political officials, and the corporate media are lying the American public into World War III. https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/osce-reports-reveal-ukraine-started

OSCE Reports Reveal Ukraine Started Shelling The Donbas Nine Days Before Russia's 'Special Military Operation' The Biden Administration, U.S. political officials, and the corporate media are lying the American public into World War III. kanekoa.news

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/rN1rg2bz2C

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine The Ukraine - Russian War Was Planned Understanding The Roots Of The Russia-Ukraine Conflict Explained By Putin https://t.co/YHodnBWoj8 Putin: We immediately said, "Guys, you can't do this, stop. No, nobody even wanted to listen. They could not fail to realise that this was a red line. We said it a thousand times. No, they did it. So here we have today's situation. And I suspect it was no accident. They needed this conflict.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the events leading up to the Ukrainian crisis 10 years ago. It highlights the technical decision made by President Yanukovych to delay the signing of the association agreement with the EU, which sparked protests in Kiev. The video also mentions the involvement of Western countries in supporting the anti-government movement and the subsequent armed opposition in Kiev. It emphasizes the impact of these events on the entire continent and the world. The transcript also includes statements from various leaders and politicians, expressing their opinions on the situation. Overall, the video suggests that the crisis could have been resolved earlier if different approaches had been taken.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Трудно даже поверить. С чего все началось? Хотите жить как в Париже? Хотим. Давайте подписывать. А кто бы сказал? Давайте почитаем. Запад поддержал государственный переворот антиконсульцион. Зачем вы раскалываете страну? Только пусть Янукович не применяет силу, но он не применил. А вооруженная оппозиция в Киеве провела Господа. Как это понимать? Вы кто такие вообще? Там попробуйте, объясните фермерам во Франции, в той же Германии, в Испании, в Греции, в Португалии, в странах юга Европы, что нужно им немножко прижаться в интересах Украины. Я посмотрю на их реакцию, но только не каких-то функционеров, а вот работяг, которые на земле работают. Speaker 1: Слова, сказанные ровно 10 лет назад, кадры сделанные в очередной раз в Speaker 0: последние Speaker 1: украинский кризис перешедший в острую фазу ровно 10 лет назад теперь определяет жизни всего континента да и во многом всего мира Speaker 0: трудно даже поверить с чего все началось С технического решения Президента Януковича перенести подписание договора об ассоциации Украины с Евросоюзом. При этом речь шла даже не об отказе от этого документа, а только о переносе сроков с целью его доработки. Это было сделано, напомню, в полном соответствии с конституционными полномочиями абсолютно легитимного международно признанного главы государства Speaker 1: 8 2013 на украине серьезные экономические сложности и за помощью президент страны янукович обращается главному стратегическому партнеру россии систско-украинские переговоры принесли сегодня сенсационные новости, а события развивались следующим образом: буквально до самого последнего момента вообще не было известно, какие именно документы сегодня будут подписаны и вот за пять минут до начала церемонии нам раздали списки подписанных документов и мы увидели что 14 самым последним пунктом стоит документ под названием Дополнение к контрактам на куплю-продажу газа от января 2009 года. Speaker 0: Который дает возможность Газпрому, что он и намерен делать, продавать на Украину газ по цене 268 с половиной долларов за тысячу кубов. Сейчас эта цена около 400 долларов. Была, можно сказать. С целью поддержки бюджета Украины правительство Российской Федерации приняло решение разместить в ценных бумагах украинского правительства часть своих резервов из фонда национального благосостояния объемом 15 миллиардов долларов США. Хочу обратить Ваше внимание и хочу всех успокоить сегодня мы вообще не обсуждали вопрос о присоединении Украины к таможенному союзу. Speaker 1: Эти слова Путин говорит потому, что украинское общество тогда уже изрядно разогрета обещаниями ассоциации с евросоюзом а взаимодействие с таможенным союзом то есть с россией подается там как некий путь назад в киеве начинаются первые митинги Speaker 0: Киев, давай! Киев, давай! Киев, давай! Speaker 1: Украина це Европа! Украина це Speaker 0: Европа! Говорят, что у украинского народа отбирают мечту, Но если посмотреть на содержание этих соглашений, то до этой мечты многие могут просто не дожить, не дотянуть. Потому что условия очень жесткие. Очень легко спекулировать на этих вопросах. Хотите жить, как в Париже? Хотим. Speaker 1: Давайте Speaker 0: подписывать. Кто бы сказал? Давайте почитаем. Вы читали, что там написано? Нет. Вы читали эту бумагу? Нет. Никто же нифига не читает. Вы хоть читать-то умеете? Посмотрите, что там написано. Рынки открыть, денег нет, нормы и торговые, и технические регламенты вести европейские. Ну значит что, промышленность надо закрыть, Это выбор кого-то? Ну хорошо. Вот если всё это посчитать, взвесить, то тогда и молодые люди вполне могут разобраться в этом и сказать: Да, мы хотим европейских стандартов, но давайте это сделаем таким образом, чтобы предприятия завтра не закрылись машиностроительные, чтобы судостроение осталось на плаву, чтобы авиация не померла, чтобы космическая отрасль не сдохла. Все эти рынки и кооперация в Speaker 1: России. Эти кадры разобраны посекундно, что фиксируют действительно судьбоносные моменты. Лидеры стран Евросоюза, до этого годами рассказывавшие о демократии и праве выбора, устраивают публичную порку президенту независимой страны януковичу за принятые им решения Speaker 0: украина приостанавливает, не прекращает, а приостанавливает процесс подписания договора с Евросоюзом и хочет все, что называется, посчитать как следует. По сути, мы услышали угрозы со стороны наших европейских партнеров в отношении Украины, вплоть до способствования проведению акций протеста. Вот это и есть давление, вот это и есть шантаж. Speaker 1: Многие жители украины россии недоумевают по поводу все новых и новых кадров из Киева митинги становятся все агрессивнее в центре столицы неприкрыто начинают действовать боевики. Speaker 0: Все что сейчас происходит говорит о том что это не революция, а хорошо подготовленная акция. Эти акции, на мой взгляд, были подготовлены не к сегодняшнему дню, они готовились к президентской выборной кампании весны 2015 года. Просто это небольшой фальш-старт, но это все заготовки к президентским выборам. Хорошо подготовленные и обученные группы боевиков, на самом деле. Вы за или против подписания Украиной соглашения об ассоциации с Европейским Союзом? Мы не за и не против, это вообще не наше дело, это суверенное право украинского народа, украинского руководства, лице президента, парламента и правительства. Правительства. Если бы нам сказали, что Украина в НАТО вступает, тогда мы были бы против реально, потому что продвижение к нашим границам инфраструктуры военного блока для нас представляет опасность Speaker 1: экономические вопросы раз за разом подчеркивает путин суверенное дело украинского руководства но невозможно не учитывать серьезнейшие связи предприятия России и Украины. Speaker 0: Я бы попросил наших друзей в Брюсселе воздержаться от резких выражений, Что, нам для того, чтобы им понравиться, нужно удавить целые отраслью нашей экономики? И я бы полагал, что нужно деполитизировать эту тему, согласиться с предложением Президента Януковича и в трехстороннем формате как следует и обстоятельно на эти все темы поговорить. Speaker 1: В здании европейской комиссии на множестве телевизоров с пометкой горячая новость постоянно идут трансляции с украины январь 14 года руководство Еврокомиссии призывают януковича к сдержанности настаивает на неприменении силы против боевиков на улицах но не видит ничего странного в том что в акциях на майдане против легитимной власти участвуют высокопоставленные западные политики и Speaker 2: меньше на украина ди всем утичкима Люди на Украине, которые так мужественно вышли на улицы и провели демонстрации, вызывают у нас огромное уважение. Впечатляет сколько людей демонстрируют, что они хотят быть ближе к Европейскому Союзу в рамках закона на основе демократических процессов. Speaker 3: Все, что происходит это воплощение надежд Сирии и Украины, их жажды свободы, честных выборов и усталости от взяточничества. Я могу себе представить, как Speaker 0: бы наши европейские партнеры отреагировали, если бы в разгар кризиса, скажем, в Греции либо на Кипре на одном из митингов антиевропейских появился бы наш министр иностранных дел и начал бы обращаться с какими-то призывами. Наши друзья, европейские тоже, обратились с призывом к Президенту, к Правительству не допускать применения силы и так далее. Применение силы это всегда крайняя мера, я с ними согласен абсолютно. Но, знаете, мы сегодня в ходе беседы, я тоже об этом сказал, на Западной Украине священнослужитель призывает толпу ехать в Киев и громить правительство и дальше аргументация чтобы в нашем доме не командовали негры москали то есть русские и жиды вы знаете, это крайне удивительно, что это делает представитель религиозной деятельности а во-вторых это ведь крайнее проявление национализма абсолютно неприемлемое в цивилизованном мире и призывая украинское правительство и президент Януковича действовать цивилизованными методами мы должны обратить внимание и на его политических противников призвать и их тоже придерживаться методов цивилизованной политической борьбы Speaker 1: сейчас почему-то не принято вспоминать но вообще-то массовые беспорядки еще в январе 14 года начались не на донбассе а на западе украины винница штурм здания областной администрации и здесь и в же томире параллельно погромы в Ровно Захват административного здания в Черновцах. Драки и штурм в Черкассах. И вот уже половине страны захвачена власть донбасс тогда молчит наблюдает ждет когда по закону будет наведен порядок в россии тоже надеются на нормализации обстановки в братской стране сочи стартуют олимпийские игры которым россии готовилась долгие 7 лет. Украинские, белорусские и российские спортсмены в олимпийской деревне живут все вместе. Белорусскую сборную на Олимпиаде поддержит президент Александр лукашенко украинский лидер также приедет сочи путин проводит отдельную встречу с украинской олимпийской сборной желает спортсменам успехов Speaker 0: очень хорошая атмосфера создается болельщиками вот конечно болеет за своих но в целом очень желательно и поддерживать всех спортсменов в том числе и других команд страшно все подобрано неожиданно Speaker 1: из Киева начинают приходить совсем уж страшные кадры стрельба убийства массовые Speaker 0: жертвы Speaker 1: С Киева начинают приходить совсем уж страшные кадры стрельба убийства массовые жертвы с момента переворота в Киеве это первый большой публичный комментарий российского президента о произошедшем и происходящем. Speaker 0: Это антиконституционный переворот и вооруженный захват власти. А что было проще сказать в тот момент времени? Вы там переворот совершили? Нет, мы же гаранты, министр иностранных дел Польши, Франции, Германии, как гаранты подписали документ соглашение между президентом Януковичем и оппозицией. Через три дня все это растоптали. А где гаранты? Спросите у них, где они эти гаранты. Почему они не сказали: Ну-ка, пожалуйста, назад все вернитесь. Януковича верните назад! И проводите конституционные демократические выборы. Speaker 4: Я подписал это соглашение, вместе с ними поставил свою подпись, Но я не услышал от них даже слов осуждения в сторону бандитов, которые стреляли в мой кортеж, в мою охрану, и не один раз. Speaker 0: Нам все время говорили, только пусть Янукович не применяет силу, только пусть не применяет силу, но он не применил. Speaker 3: Важно также убедиться в том, что украинские военные не будут вовлечены в кризис, который должен быть разрешен гражданским обществом. Speaker 0: 21 числа вечером мне президент Обама позвонил, мы с ним обсудили эти вопросы, сказали о том, как мы будем способствовать исполнению этих договорённостей, Россия взяла на себя определённые обязательства. Я услышал, что мой американский коллега готов взять на себя определенные обязательства. Это все было 21 вечером. В тот же день мне позвонил Президент Янукович, сказал, что он подписал, считает, что ситуация стабилизировалась, и он собирается поехать в Харьков на конференцию. Не скрою, это не секрет, я выразил определенную озабоченность, сказал, возможно ли в такой ситуации покидать столицу. Он ответил, что считает возможным, поскольку есть документ, подписанный с оппозиции, и министр иностранных дел европейских стран выступили гарантами исполнения этой договоренности. Скажу вам еще больше. Я ему ответил, что я сомневаюсь в том, что все так будет хорошо, но это его дело, он же в конце концов президент, он чувствует ситуацию, ему виднее, как поступать. Во всяком случае, мне кажется, нельзя выводить силу правопорядка из Киева, сказал ему я. Он сказал: Да, конечно, это я понимаю. Уехал и дал команду вывести все силы правопорядка из Киева. Красавец Леша. Я Speaker 4: верил в порядочность иностранных посредников. Меня не просто обманули, меня цинично обманули, но не меня обманули, обманули весь украинский народ. Speaker 0: Янукович свою власть практически сдал. Он согласился на все, что требовала оппозиция. Он согласился на досрочные выборы парламента, на досрочные выборы Президента, согласился вернуться к Конституции 2004 года. Вы там Януковича успокоите, а мы успокоим оппозицию. Янукович не применил, как просили нас американцы, ни вооруженных сил, ни полиции. А вооруженная оппозиция в Киеве провела госпереворот. Как это понимать? Вы кто такие вообще? Неохота здесь камеры работают, жесты определенные показывать. Вы понимаете, какие жесты мне сейчас хочется показать. Вот что они нам показали. Поняли, что окончательно свинтить Украину под себя исключительно политическими средствами не удается, совершили госпереворот, лишили нас шансов нормальным политическим образом выстраивать отношения с этой страной. Они действовали и пошли, как у нас в народе говорят, простите за моветон, по беспределу просто. Уже началась гражданская война и хаос. Кому это, зачем это надо было делать, если Янукович и так со всем согласился? Надо было пойти на выборы, и те же люди пришли бы сейчас к власти только легальным путем. Мы, как идиоты, платили бы 15 миллиардов, которые обещали, держали бы низкие цены на газ, дальше продолжали субсидировать экономику. И давайте прямо, здесь же все взрослые люди, правильно, умные, грамотные люди. Запад поддержал государственный переворот антиконстуционный. Что дальше? Вот смотрите, госпереворот совершили, с нами разговаривать не хотят, у нас какие мысли? Следующий шаг Украина в НАТО. Мы считаем, что с нами пытались разговаривать с помощью силы, и что мы, именно действуя в такой логике, дали адекватные ответы. Мы не создавали этого кризиса, мы были противниками такого развития событий. Не мы же там пирожки раздавали повстанцам на этот счет. Да, мы понимаем, там сложные процессы, но не таким же образом их нужно решать, причём где? Прямо у наших границ. Но вы где находитесь? За тысячи километров? А мы здесь? Это наша Земля. Вы за что хотите там бороться? Не знаете? А мы знаем, и мы на это готовы. Я бы никогда не стал этого делать, если бы не считал, что мы обязаны поступить именно таким образом. Что касается хронологии событий, то сначала произошел государственный переворот и захват власти, и вот с этого момента наши взгляды и пути с руководством Украины стали диаметрально противоположными. С этого момента мы с ними разошлись. Но после этого Крым вернулся в состав Российской Федерации, а не наоборот. Так что у нас отношения испортились с Украиной, с Крымом в принципе не связано. Мы разве какие-то операции в Крыму или где-то еще проводили с нормальной страной и с нормальной властью? Нет, никогда этого не делали, в голове даже этого не держали. Но зачем же западные страны поддержали государственный переворот? С этого момента для нас власть на Украине источник власти, госпереворот, а не воля народа. Speaker 1: Откуда вам это известно? Очень просто, Speaker 0: потому что люди, которые живут на Украине, у нас с ними тысяча совместных всяких контактов и тысяча связей И мы знаем, кто, где, когда встречался, работал с теми людьми, которые свергали Януковича, как их поддерживали, сколько платили, как готовили, на каких территориях, в каких странах и кто были эти инструкторы. Мы все знаем. Speaker 1: Вы уважаете суверенитет Украины? Speaker 0: Конечно. Но мы хотели бы, чтобы и другие страны уважали суверенитет других стран, в том числе и Украины. А уважать суверенитет это значит не допускать государственных переворотов. Это кто делал? Американские наши дружки. А европейцы, которые подписались как гаранты договоренности между властью и оппозицией, сделали вид, что вообще ничего не знают. С этого всё началось. Сейчас говорят: ну давайте об этом не будем вспоминать. Нет, будем помнить об этом всегда, потому что в этом причина, и причина в тех людях, которые способствовали этому перевороту. Но Speaker 1: даже после сотен жертв, документальных кадров кровавых побоищ, та же Меркель, и спустя годы, публично говорила: Speaker 2: Мы считаем, что украинское правительство пришло к власти демократическим путем. Speaker 0: Если мы будем вот так вот с разными стандартами подходить к одинаковым явлениям, что мы никогда ни о чем не сможем договориться. Мы должны утвердить, в конце концов, не право сильного и право кулака в международных делах, а нормы международного права. Speaker 1: -Конфликт на Украине и вокруг нее, который разгорелся ровно 10 лет назад, который сейчас поставил мир на грань третьей мировой войны, мог быть урегулирован еще тогда, в феврале 14-го. Speaker 0: Вы же сразу сказали: ребята, так нельзя, остановитесь. Нет, никто ее слушать не хотел. Они же не могли не понимать, что это красная черта, мы тысячу раз об этом сказали, нет, полезли. Вот мы получили сегодняшнюю ситуацию. Я подозреваю, что не случайно им нужен был этот конфликт. Speaker 1: В результате сша разорвали связи россии и европы разожгли вооруженный конфликт между братскими народами но и по своему положению в мире нанесли такой удар от которого некогда глобальный лидер уже вряд ли когда-либо оправиться

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/VdXEQCpDok

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

They promised NATO would not expand to the East! At the🇩🇪reunification meeting (GDR and FRG) in 1990,🇩🇪Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher told his US counterpart, James Baker, that NATO would not expand to the East. Present also is E. Schevardnadze, Soviet Foreign Minister. https://t.co/pIvSMNMQfi

Video Transcript AI Summary
The West promised not to expand NATO eastward in exchange for German reunification. The then Foreign Minister in Washington made significant commitments, stating that there was no intention to extend the defense area to the east, not just in relation to East Germany, but in general.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Im Gegenzug zur deutschen Einheit verspricht der Westen, die NATO nicht weiter nach Osten vorrücken zu lassen. In Washington macht der damalige Außenminister weitreichende Zusagen. Speaker 1: Wir waren uns einig, dass nicht die Absicht besteht, das Radioverteidigungsgebiet auszudehnen nach Osten. Das gilt übrigens nicht nur in Bezug auf die DDR, die wir da nicht einverleiben wollen, sondern das gilt ganz generell.
Saved - August 1, 2024 at 10:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been sharing insights on the Russia-Ukraine-NATO conflict, highlighting key events and perspectives often overlooked. I discussed NATO's eastward expansion, the CIA's long-standing involvement in Ukraine, and the role of U.S. officials in the 2014 coup that led to significant violence against Russian-speaking citizens. I also touched on the implications of foreign aid, the existence of biolabs, and the broader geopolitical stakes involving globalist agendas. The narrative often presented by mainstream media doesn't capture the full complexity of this situation.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

1/17. I’ve been asked to make my Russian/Ukraine/NATO War into a THREAD 🧵 It is known that James Baker in 1990 said that NATO agreed it would not move “1 inch eastward.” Although the map below is outdated, it does show NATO expansion. See also the community note.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

“The Putin Interviews” depicts Oliver Stone and Putin discussing Ukraine joining NATO in 2017!

Video Transcript AI Summary
НАТО влияет на страны, не давая им контролировать решения. Американское влияние укрепляется в Европе, особенно восточноевропейские страны. Россия сталкивается с негативным отношением из-за кризиса на Украине, но угрозы от нее нет. Страны стремятся укрепить свою независимость и защитить национальные интересы от внешнего давления. Translation: NATO influences countries without allowing them to control decisions. American influence is strengthening in Europe, especially in Eastern European countries. Russia faces negative attitudes due to the crisis in Ukraine, but there is no threat from it. Countries aim to strengthen their independence and protect national interests from external pressure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Я вижу. И эта угроза заключается в том, что когда НАТО приходит в ту или иную страну, то, как правило, политическое руководство этой страны и население страны не могут влиять на принимаемые НАТО решения, в том числе по размещению военной инфраструктуры, не исключая, например, и постановку очень чувствительных систем вооружения, в том числе и противоракетной обороны. Сейчас происходит определенное укрепление вот этого американского влияния, в том числе и в Европе, в том числе за счет восточноевропейских стран, потому что они еще находятся в парадигме противостояния другому доминанту в виде бывшего Советского Союза, это перекладывается все на сегодняшнюю Россию, но рано или поздно это закончится. Смогли с помощью инициирования кризиса, скажем, на Украине возбудить такое отношение к России как к возможным агрессорам. Но всё-таки очень скоро всем самим понятно, что никакой угрозы со стороны России не исходит ни прибалтийским странам, ни восточноевропейским, уж ни тем более каким-то более отдаленным в Западной Европе. По мере укрепления этого понимания будет расти желание укреплять свой суверенитет и защищать свои национальные интересы, Постоянно чувствовать на себе какое-то внешнее давление, уверяю вас, это ни у кого не вызывает восторга, рано или поздно это будет иметь свой результат, и это когда-то всё равно закончится.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

3/17. The CIA have been plotting in Ukraine against Russia a long time.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨The New York Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA built "12 Secret Spy Bases" in Ukraine, waging a shadow war against Russia for the past decade. After a U.S.-supported violent coup toppled Ukraine's democratically elected government, CIA Director John Brennan visited Kyiv in April 2014. Shortly after, the new Ukrainian government launched an "anti-terror operation" against its Russian-speaking citizens in Eastern Ukraine. For eight years leading up to Russia's invasion in 2022, Ukraine's government, with help from the CIA, relentlessly bombed Eastern Ukraine. Millions of innocent civilians were caught in the crossfire of a geopolitical chess match between Russia and the United States. This is part of the story often ignored by the Western press.

Video Transcript AI Summary
John Brennan possibly traveled to Kyiv under another name, but it's unclear. US VP Biden pledged $50 million in aid to help Ukraine through the crisis. Pro-Russian separatists clashed with ultranationalists, raising civil war concerns. The US aims to support Ukraine's stability and security by providing assistance and information. Ukraine deserves to determine its future free from outside interference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Various people have said that John Brennan, the head of the CIA, traveled possibly under another name to Kyiv. And I just wanted to know, did he travel there? Does it have anything to do Speaker 1: with this action? Just to No. It it happened only in in the, in some commands from Moscow. I don't know. So Thank you. Were you in Kyiv recently? I was in Kyiv a couple weeks ago. Yes. Mhmm. Could you tell us what your mission was? I was out there to, interact with, our Ukrainian partners and friends. Ukraine's acting president has announced the start of an anti terrorist operation in the east of the country. Today was the day Kyiv sent Is there not a grassroots movement though by Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine who are not happy with the current situation? We do have difference in my country. That's true. Every country has differences, but we are ready to bridge all this difference. Speaker 2: Easter Sunday was anything but peaceful in this corner of Eastern Ukraine. At least 2 people were killed in a gunfight near Slovians at this makeshift check point manned by pro Russian separatists. They say they were attacked by a convoy of ultranationalists called the right sector whose power base is in the west. Speaker 1: It's not clear what happened here, but this is exactly the kind of incident that can really blow this situation up into a civil war. US officials say the vice presidents in Kyiv to boost economic and political assistance to authorities there. Speaker 3: Speaking to its new pro western leaders, US vice president Joe Biden pledged to help Ukraine through the crisis, including an aid package of $50,000,000. Speaker 4: We can help in stabilizing and strengthening Ukraine's economy Speaker 5: by helping you withstand the unfair economic pressure being thrust upon you. We stand ready Speaker 6: to do that, and I say Speaker 1: ready. Ukrainian people deserve to, determine their future, again, free from outside interference, and that's what the United States is trying to do. And, to the extent that we here at CIA can work with our partners in Ukraine and other areas to give them the, the information, the capabilities that they need in order to bring stability and security back to the country, we will do that.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

4/17. More on the CIA operating in Ukraine. “The first casualty of war is the truth.” What the media does not tell you…which is a lot.

@C_N_F__on__X - Conservative News Feed

If you listen to the Biden administration and pundits from the left they will tell you that Russia invaded Ukraine. The war would be over if Russia would just pack up their bags and go home. As we all know the first casualty of war is the truth. What if I told you Ukraine has been invaded long before 2022 and not by Russia? The Office For Strategic Services was the intelligence agency for the United States during World War Two. The OSS was dissolved a month after the end of the war. The war ended but the intelligence gathering and espionage was just getting started. The OSS was disbanded in 1945 but it never really went away. The CIA has been involved in clandestine activities shaping geopolitics all over the globe since its inception in 1947. The CIA has been confirmed to be responsible for disinformation campaigns, color revolutions, regime changes and assassinations. Do you really think the US had nothing to do with the Maidan Coup and the reshaping of Ukraine? #DeepState

Video Transcript AI Summary
The truth about US interference in Ukraine, dating back to WWII when CIA worked with Ukrainian Nazis, led to the rise of extremist groups like Svoboda and Right Sector. Yanukovych's refusal of IMF's offer sparked a US-backed coup orchestrated by the State Department and Joe Biden. The push for war against Russia serves globalist interests, not patriotism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first casualty of war is the truth. And if the American people knew the truth about US interference in Ukraine, they might not be so eager to start World War 3. During World War 2, Western Ukraine sided with the Nazis. After the war, the CIA helped Ukrainian Nazis evade the Nuremberg trials and began operating with them within the Ukraine. After decades of CIA infiltration, Speaker 1: the Ukrainian People's Movement Speaker 0: the Ukrainian People's Movement emerged in 1989 and gave birth to extremist groups, Svoboda, Trident, and Right Sector. Neo Nazi groups pushing for the ethnic cleansing of Ukraine. Extremist groups cultivated by the CIA, supported by the US state department, and used by the IMF to bring Ukraine to heal. When Yanukovych beat NATO backed Yushchenko in the 2010 elections, his government was being pressured into signing an EU association agreement by the International Monetary Fund in their typical conquer by debt offer that would financially ruin the Ukraine and place them at the mercy of the World Bank. Yanukovych declined their offer. And in today's corrupt world, you're not allowed to say no to the IMF. Funded by western NGOs associated with George Soros and the CIA, a highly organized color revolution was immediately deployed against Yanukovych. Leaked phone calls reveal that the US state department was orchestrating this coup d'etat from within the US embassy with support from vice president Joe Biden. Speaker 2: Sullivan's come back to me, VFR saying, you need Biden, and I said, probably tomorrow for an attaboy and to get the deeds to stick. So Biden's willing. Speaker 1: So you had this remarkable phone call where you have these 2 senior officials of the US government apparently talking about a coup or how they were planning to restructure the government of Ukraine. Speaker 2: Fuck the EU. No. Exactly. Speaker 0: Supporting a criminal war against Russia does not make you a patriot. It makes you a useful idiot of the globalist banking cartel. The very same entities waging war on all of humanity with vaccine passports and experimental jam.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

5/17. The Joe Biden connection in Ukraine….2014.

@ChrisToddNolan - Christopher Todd Nolan

A few years ago I made a series of documentaries on the war in Ukraine. This relatively short video is a summary of how it really began in 2014. An unelected government began killing its "own" people in the south-east of the country after visits from Joe Biden and John Brennan.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Masters of war build guns, sparking protests turned revolution in Ukraine. Yanukovych's refusal to sign EU agreement led to his removal. Russia's involvement in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine escalated tensions. US offered support to Ukraine, condemning separatist referendums. Violent clashes ensued, with accusations of Ukrainian forces causing civilian casualties. Ceasefire ended, military actions resumed. The conflict continues, with both sides engaging in armed confrontations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Come, you masters of war. You that build up guns. Speaker 1: Is there now going to be some sort of mass public Speaker 2: protest movement? Speaker 3: How does this suddenly morph from a protest into a revolution, as the protesters are calling, looking to topple an elected government. Speaker 2: It's not an easy job to topple the government, to change the president, to sign an association agreement, but this is our agenda. We are waiting that president Yanukovych return back to Brussels and sign up agreement. Speaker 4: Good to Speaker 0: see you. We're here to come back. Would you like some bread? Speaker 4: Signing the association agreement with the EU would also put Ukraine on a path to strengthening the sort of stable and predictable business environment that investors require. Speaker 5: The free world is with you. America is Speaker 4: with you. I am with you. It would be a huge shame to see 5 years worth of work and preparation go to waste if the if the AA is not signed in the near future. So it is time to finish the job. Speaker 6: We have been actively engaged in what's been happening in the Ukraine. Speaker 4: I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. Obviously not gonna comment on private diplomatic conversations. Speaker 5: These, brave Ukrainians took to the streets in order to stand peacefully against tyranny. Speaker 6: And we expect, the Ukrainian government, to show the strength, to not resort to violence and dealing with, peaceful protesters. Speaker 5: So instead, they were met with snipers who picked them off one after the other. Speaker 7: From one of the upper windows of the hotel, a shock rang out. I saw the shooter. He was wearing one of the protesters' green helmets. Speaker 8: So that there is a stronger and stronger understanding that behind snipers, they were it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition. Some journalists who were with me, they saw during the day day that one member of parliament was just beat in front of parliament, pinning credit skies with the guns on the streets. Speaker 7: In special session, Ukraine's parliament voted to remove president Viktor Yanukovych. Speaker 8: Because the richest party also said, well, you will see that if the people from the eastern part of Ukraine will will really wake up and, and and and will start to demand their rights. Speaker 9: And the latest is that several 100 Russian troops, have arrived arrived at a Ukrainian military base not far from here where there is now a confrontation. Speaker 5: You just don't invade another country on phony pretext, in order to assert your interests. Speaker 10: Pro Russian demonstrators came here. They swept their way in. They even raised the Russian flag, but they've now been kicked out. The deputy mayor of this city has told the BBC that he thinks a referendum may be a chance to calm tensions here, to give pro Russian population chance to decide its own status. Speaker 11: Crimeans voted overwhelmingly on Sunday to break away from Ukraine and join Russia in a referendum the west condemned as Speaker 2: the army. Speaker 6: In Ukraine, pro Russian militants have seized a second building in the eastern city of Sloviansk, the local headquarters of the Speaker 12: state security service. Not just the police headquarters or an administration building that's occupied. Here in Sloviansk, the whole city is under control of pro Russia forces because they've got checkpoints on all Speaker 6: the entrances and access. On his Facebook page, the Ukrainian interior minister promised a very tough response. He said there's a difference between protesters and terrorists. Speaker 13: Various people have said that John Brennan, the head of the CIA, traveled possibly under another name to Kyiv. And I just wanted to know, did he travel there? Does it have anything to do with this action? Speaker 5: Just to No. It it happened only in in the in some commands from Moscow. I don't know. So Thank you. Speaker 14: Were you in Kyiv recently? Speaker 15: I was in Kyiv a couple of weeks ago. Yes. Speaker 14: Mhmm. Could you tell us what your mission was? Speaker 15: I was out there to, interact with, our Ukrainian partners and friends. Speaker 7: Ukraine's acting president has announced the start of an anti terrorist operation in the east of the country. Today was Speaker 2: the day Kyiv sent in troops Speaker 7: to try to wrest back control of the east. Speaker 2: Is there not a grassroots movement, though, by Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine who are not happy with the current situation? We do have difference in my country. That's true. Every country has differences, but we are ready to bridge all the difference. Speaker 16: Easter Sunday was anything but peaceful in this corner of Eastern Ukraine. At least 2 people were killed in a gunfight near Slovians at the snake ship's checkpoint manned by pro Russian separatists. They say they were attacked by a convoy of ultranationalists called the right sector whose power base is in the west. Speaker 17: It's not clear what happened here, but this is exactly the kind of incident that Speaker 18: could really blow this situation up into a civil war. US officials say the vice president's in Kyiv to boost economic and political assistance to authorities there. Speaker 19: Speaking to its new pro western leaders, US vice president Joe Biden pledged to help Ukraine through the crisis, including an aid package of $50,000,000. Speaker 20: We can help in stabilizing and strengthening Ukraine's economy by helping you withstand the unfair economic pressure being thrust upon you. We stand ready to do that, and I say Speaker 15: ready. Ukrainian people deserve to, determine their future. Again, free from outside interference, and that's what the United States is trying to do. And, to the extent that we here at CIA can work with our partners in Ukraine and other areas to to give them the, the information, the the capabilities that they need in order to bring stability and security back to that country, we will do that. Speaker 13: So tell me, why are you here? Who are these people? Speaker 17: There was a fire in the trade union's building in Odessa where the pro Russian protesters have a base of operations. Apparently, at least 30 or in the thirties, numbers of people who died, some figures are 30 one. Other people are saying 38 people at least died, many of them from smoke inhalation and from jumping from the upper stories of the building. It's not clear exactly what started the, the the blaze, and it's not clear who exactly were was caught in the fire. But as I said, there were a number of, pro Russian protesters who was probably there. Speaker 5: We also are are very concerned about efforts of pro Russian separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk, to organize, frankly, a contrived, a bogus independence referendum on May 11th. Speaker 1: Ukrainian forces knew what they wanted, and they came in force. Their assault on Mariupolsk police station sustained. Ukraine says it's a legitimate military action to evict pro Russian militias out of buildings, and many here said nothing more than the action of a fascist regime supported by the west. Rocket propelled grenades fired in city center streets, shooting where yesterday people were shopping. They've recaptured the police station alright, but in saving it, they destroyed it. Speaker 21: This is quite a statement. Ukrainian forces have now left, leaving this behind them. The point they're making, Mariupol, is one time they are not going to surrender without a plan. Speaker 22: Polling stations are being prepared across Donetsk for Sunday's referendum, a vote widely condemned as illegitimate. It's unclear what a yes result would lead to. The question is, do you support the People's Republic of Donetsk? Speaker 4: We do not recognize, the illegal referendum that took place in portions of Donetsk and Luhansk, over the weekend. It was illegal under Ukrainian law and an attempt to create further division and disorder in the country. Speaker 23: We will not recognize the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. Likewise, we do not recognize the so called referenda of yesterday. Speaker 24: So if you can't get them to talk to the table, how are you going to take back those areas that they control without the first few months of your presidency being drenched in blood? Speaker 13: Yeah. Those are helicopters now moving in on the airport. Speaker 4: The day after Ukrainian forces launched air strikes to drive separatists from the airport, Speaker 5: Donbas, Speaker 2: defend and clean and bring the peace in the Donbas, including the fighting against terror. This is the one of the main function of the state, to defend the Speaker 0: people. Speaker 3: The bloody aftermath of a strike on the separatist headquarters in the heart of Luhansk. 5 women killed, 3 men, officials say. Speaker 13: Some people were saying there was kind of there was an airstrike in Luhansk, that there was some bomb drop on the administrative headquarters of the separatists. Is it true? No. Speaker 3: The Ukrainians claim that this had nothing to do with a military aircraft which was circling overhead at the time of the attack. But from what we can tell, this looks like very heavy cannon fire from an aircraft strafing through this square. Speaker 5: No bombing, either by from airplanes or artillery were permitted by the, the, you know, leaders of the Ministry of Defense. Speaker 25: So everything that the Ukrainians are doing, I just want to understand your position correctly. Everything that they are doing is actually self defense. Correct? Speaker 26: They're I mean, look. I mean, I don't wanna use the term self defense, but this is Ukrainian territory that they are defending. Speaker 27: US president Barack Obama has offered Kyiv financial and security support during his first meeting with his newly elected Ukrainian counterpart. Speaker 0: Also, Giovanni, my dear friend. I so was together. You were fighting the sun. And when I ask you why, you raise your sticks and cry, and I follow my friend. How did you Speaker 7: These volunteers have joined the so called Azov battalion, a special force raised by the interior ministry in Kiev. Speaker 17: A few hours left until the end of the ceasefire. Speaker 21: Oh, Speaker 10: A truce ends. Within hours, military action resumes. Speaker 7: This morning, an active phase of the anti terrorist operation has been renewed. Our armed forces are launching strikes against the terrorist bases. Speaker 14: Multiple rockets hit a residential area in Western Donetsk called the Petrovsky District, killing 7 people, including 2 children. But in 4 attacks against populated areas that human rights was investigated in Donetsk, the evidence strongly indicates that Ukrainian government forces were responsible. Speaker 26: Among the dead, a female guard at the Lugansk Southern District School killed by Speaker 13: shrapnel. Speaker 0: But built it too strong. You play with my wallet like it's your little toy. You put a gun in his head, and you hide from his hands. And you turn and run farther when the basketball is fine.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

6/17. In 2014 CIA helped to overthrow Ukraine’s government and install a puppet leader. Not the first time the U.S. has done this and won’t be the last.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

The 2014 CIA-supported overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected government. A Ukrainian court recently ruled that the snipers firing on Maidan protestors primarily operated from Hotel Ukraina, a location controlled by U.S.-backed extremists.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The protesters in Ukraine aim to topple the government by urging President Yanukovych to sign an association agreement with the EU. They are supported by the US and other nations. The focus is on creating a stable business environment and preventing violence against peaceful demonstrators.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How does this suddenly morph from a protest into a revolution as the protesters are calling, looking to topple an elected government? Speaker 1: It's not an easy job to topple the government, to change the president, to sign an association agreement, but this is our agenda. We are waiting that president Yanukovych return back to Brussels and sign that agreement. Speaker 2: Good to see you. We're here from America. Would you like some red Signing the association agreement with the EU would also put Ukraine on a path to strengthening the sort of stable and predictable business environment that investors require. Speaker 1: The free world is with you. America is with you. I am with you. Speaker 2: It would be a huge shame to see 5 years worth of work and preparation go to waste if if the AA is not signed in the near future. So it is time to finish the job. Speaker 1: We have been actively engaged in what's been happening in the Ukraine. Speaker 2: I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. Obviously not gonna comment on private diplomatic conversations. Speaker 1: These, brave Ukrainians took to the streets in order to stand peacefully against tyranny. And we expect, the Ukrainian government, to show restraint, to not resort to violence and dealing with, peaceful protesters.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

8/17. “Foreign Aid” in other words YOUR money.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

9/17. Yes Bio Labs did exist. The media lied. 🙄

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

I will leave you with a great documentary on who controls the world economy. BlackRock/ Vanguard and State Street are spoken about… Obviously there is much more that is not mentioned here such as the !sraeli connection and such but maybe another time….. https://rumble.com/vmyx1n-monopoly-who-owns-the-world-documentary-by-tim-gielen.html

MONOPOLY - Who owns the world? Documentary by Tim Gielen This incredibly eye opening documentary reveals something astonishing: the majority of our world is owned by the very same people. Because of this they can control the entire world and impose their wi rumble.com

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

For some reason, many of the posts in this thread got deleted by somebody? I did not get a notice or a message regarding these deletions. So I’m going to add them here again at the end. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

7/17 “2017 will be the year of offense… all of us will go back to Washington, and push the case against Russia. “

@Arsenalsgatan - moT Bombadil 🏴‍☠️

@WarClandestine

Video Transcript AI Summary
We support your fight for your homeland against Russian aggression. In 2017, we will take the case against Putin to Washington. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. We promise to bring your bravery to the American people and the world. We believe you will win, and we will provide what you need to succeed. The world is watching because we cannot let Putin succeed here, as it may lead to success in other countries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I admire the fact that you will fight for your homeland. Your fight is our fight. 2017 will be the year of offense. All of us will go back to Washington, and we will push the case against Russia. Enough of our Russian aggression. It is time for them to pay a heavier price. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. Our promise to you is to take your calls to Washington. Inform the American people of your bravery. And make the case against Putin to the world. Speaker 1: I believe you will win. I am convinced you will win, and we will do everything we can to provide you with what you need to win. And we have succeeded not because of equipment but because of your courage. So I thank you, and the world is watching. And the world is watching because we cannot allow Vladimir Putin to succeed here. Because if he succeeds here, he will succeed in other countries.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 1)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine, claiming it benefits American defense contractors like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed through NATO expansion. They criticize the large sums of money being allocated to Ukraine, suggesting it is a money laundering scheme benefiting companies like BlackRock. The speaker highlights loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, leading to the sale of government assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the exploitation of Ukraine's valuable agricultural land by companies like DuPont and Monsanto, ultimately controlled by BlackRock. The speaker concludes by emphasizing a strategy to keep the population divided and distracted by internal conflicts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a war that shouldn't ever happen. It's a war that Russians tried repeatedly to settle on terms that were very, very beneficial to Ukraine and us. The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine. The big military contractors want to add new countries to NATO all the time. Why? Because then that country has to form its military purchases to NATO weapon specifications, which means certain companies, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics Boeing, and Lockheed get a trapped market. Through March of 2022, we committed a $113,000,000,000. Just to give you an example, we could have built a home for almost every homeless person in this country. We then committed another 24,000,000,000 since that 2 months ago, and now president Biden's asking for another 60,000,000,000. But the big, big are gonna come after the war when we have to rebuild all the things that we destroyed. Mitch McConnell was asked, and we really afford to send spend a 113,000,000 to Ukraine. He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to American Defense Manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme. And who do you think owns every one of those companies? BlackRock. BlackRock. So Tim Scott, during the Republican debate, said, don't worry. It's not a gift to Ukraine. It's a loan. So raise your hand if you think that that loan is ever getting paid back. Yeah. Of course, it's not. So why do they call it a loan? Because if they call it a loan, they can impose loan conditions. And what are the loan conditions that we impose on? Number 1, of extreme austerity program so that if you're poor in Ukraine, you're gonna be poor forever. Number 2, most important, Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe. In Ukraine, there's been a 1000 years of war fought over that land. It's the richest farmland in the world. It's the breadbasket of Europe. 500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine. They almost certainly didn't know about that slown condition. They've already sold 30% of it. The buyers were DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto. Who do you think owns all of those companies? BlackRock. Yeah. BlackRock. And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Accra. So they're doing this right in front of us. They don't even care that we know anymore because they know that they can get away with it. And how do they know that? Because they have a strategy. And that strategy is old, old strategy, which is they keep us at war with each other. They keep us hating on each other. They keep the Republicans and Democrats fighting each other and black against white and all these divisions that they sell.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 2)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The EPA budget is $12 billion, while Ukraine receives 12 times that amount annually. Even after the war ends, the US plans to spend half a trillion on rebuilding Ukraine. Mitch McConnell stated that the money goes to US military contractors, benefiting the country. This reveals the money laundering scheme involving companies like Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Higher budget for EPA is $12,000,000,000, so that's all we have for the environment in this country. We're giving 12 times that to Ukraine in 1 year, and that's just the beginning because even if the Ukraine war ended today, we're still gonna spend a half a trillion there rebuilding the country. The contracts to rebuild are even bigger than the war contracts. So Mitch McConnell was asked in in March because the Republicans are supposed to be concerned about budget deficits. And he said, can we really afford a $113,000,000,000 he was at? He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to US military contractors, so it's good for our country. Oh, he just admitted exactly what we've all been saying, that it's all just a money laundering scheme. A Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed. Who do you think owns every one of those countries?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 3)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russia sends troops to Ukraine to ensure they won't join NATO. After a treaty is signed, Putin starts withdrawing troops, but Biden pressures Ukraine to break the agreement. As a result, many children have tragically died since then.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is their only warm water port, and they know the new government that we just installed is gonna invite the US Navy into their port. So then the Russians go in. They only send 40,000 people. It's a nation of 44,000,000 people. They clearly do not intend to conquer Ukraine, but they want us back at the negotiating table. The Russians just want a guarantee that Ukraine won't join NATO. Zelensky signs the treaty. Putin's people sign the treaty, and Putin starts withdrawing the Russian troops in good faith. And what happens? Joe Biden sends Boris Johnson, the British prime minister, over to Ukraine in April and forces him to tear up the treaty. And since then, 450 1,000 kids have died who none of them

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

11/17

@RightFight2024 - SheAin'tBlack

@truthtroll_X Would USA attack Mexico if AMLO decided to give Russia or China permission to build military bases on our Southern border? You bet your ass we would! And that's the gist of the Ukraine war.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12/17 Ukraine was (is) one of the most corrupt countries on earth. Human trafficking has been a problem, especially since the US got involved. Much like when the US got involved in Haiti, and now at its own borders with the migrant issue, human trafficking is rampant…

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12/ (Pic 2) I’m not too sure what she could offer as an ambassador?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

13/17

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

EX CIA AGENT explains why Russia 🇷🇺 cannot let Ukraine 🇺🇦 go. It would be similar to the United States 🇺🇸 letting Canada 🇨🇦 or Mexico 🇲🇽 go to Russia. It just couldn’t happen.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin is determined not to lose Ukraine due to its strategic importance for Russia's security, agriculture, and energy pipelines. The US supports Ukraine out of ideology, not economic interest, leading to a geopolitical power struggle. Ukraine becomes a pawn in a global game involving Russia, the US, Iran, and China.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Putin cannot lose. He will not let himself lose. Russia knows. They know they have to have Ukraine. They know that they have to have it to protect themselves against military pressure from the West. They have to have it for agricultural reasons. Ukraine is the agricultural bed to support a future Russia. They have major, oil and natural gas pipelines that flow through eastern Ukraine. They they cannot let Ukraine fall outside of their sphere of influence. They cannot. The United States doesn't really have any economic vested interest in Ukraine. The West siding with Ukraine is exclusively ideological, and it's putting them in a place where they fight a war with Russia so the whole world can see Russia's capabilities. As sad as it is to say, man, Ukraine is a pawn on a table for superpowers to calculate each other's capacities. Right now, we've only talked about Russia and United States. We haven't even talked about Iran. We haven't even talked about China. Right? It is a pawn on a table. This is a chicken fight so that people get to watch and see what the other trainers are

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

13 (pic 2) If Ukraine became NATO and the US figured that Putin wasn’t being a “good little boy“ the US/NATO would impose sanctions on Russia. In the grain trade alone could have devastating effects on Russian food supply.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

14/17 And for those of you who continue to watch mainstream media for whatever reason? And think you’re getting real uncensored news….

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Who do you think owns these six companies that own all the media on the planet? You guessed it….. Blackrock But the sheep all think that they’re getting uncensored news every day.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1980s, 50 companies owned 90% of American media, now just 6 major conglomerates control it all. Comcast is the largest, making $69 billion in 2014, owning NBCUniversal and Hulu. Disney follows with $48 billion revenue, owning theme parks, movie studios, and TV networks. 21st Century Fox makes $32 billion annually, focusing on film and TV, including Fox News. Time Warner lost $100 billion after a merger with AOL, now separate. CBS and Viacom were once one company controlled by National Amusements. Today, 5 conglomerates effectively control the media landscape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the early 19 eighties, roughly 50 different companies owned 90% of American media. By 1992, that number had dropped to less than 2 dozen. And in recent years, that same 90% has fallen to just 6 major conglomerates. Although various mergers and layers of external control make this an inexact number, most of the big six hold interests in film production, cable and broadcast television, news, sports, music, and online streaming. So who exactly controls the media? As of 2015, the largest media company in the world by revenue is Comcast. According to the SEC, in 2014, they reportedly made nearly $69,000,000,000 Like the other conglomerates, Comcast owns nearly every step in media production and distribution. In fact, Comcast is the single largest cable provider on Earth. Content is created through subsidiaries like NBCUniversal, which is then broadcast over TV and the Internet through Xfinity. Comcast is also a major Internet service provider, covering more than half of all US broadband customers. Even online streaming giant, Hulu, is jointly owned by 3 of the big six. The next largest conglomerate is the Walt Disney Company, with reportedly roughly $48,000,000,000 in revenue. Disney has holdings in theme parks, movie studios, and diverse television networks such as ABC, A and E, and ESPN. They also own a number of legacy companies like Pixar, Marvel Entertainment, and Lucasfilms of the Star Wars franchise. The 3rd of the big six is 21st Century Fox, which emerged in 2013 as a spin off of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation. Today, Fox makes about $32,000,000,000 a year and is predominantly focused on film and television, including Fox News Channel, which made nearly $800,000,000 in ad revenue in 2,014. The last independent conglomerate is Time Warner, with revenues of about $27,000,000,000 In the 19 nineties, they were the largest media company in the world, but an unsuccessful merger with AOL at the peak of the dotcom bubble made them lose nearly $100,000,000,000 in 2002. Since then, AOL and Time Inc, as well as Time Warner's entire cable division, have become separate companies. Because they are now unrelated, Time Warner and Time Warner Cable are the 4th and 5th largest media companies in the world, according to Forbes. Finally, the last 2 are CBS and Viacom. In 2013, they reported about 14 to $15,000,000,000 in revenue each. They used to be a single company controlled by National Amusements, a movie theater chain. Today, although they are individually held, National Amusements owners have enough stock in both to effectively dictate control. So in a way, there aren't even 6 conglomerates, but 5. You state cat You are fake news.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

14 (part 2) Blackrock – what RFK was referring to earlier and the company who owns not only the media, but the rest of the world, along with Vanguard and State Street

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Who Is Aladdin? Who controls more WEALTH than any country on earth? #LarryFink #Vanguard #Blackrock #StateStreet #Monarch #WallStreet #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #EFront #Aladdin #ShadowBank #ProjectMonarch #JoeBiden

Video Transcript AI Summary
A robot named Aladdin, created by Larry Fink of BlackRock, controls $21 trillion of the global economy. It directs major banks, investment funds, and traders, dominating ETFs, bonds, and stocks. Aladdin's influence extends to government decisions and real estate markets. With plans to expand further, concerns arise about its growing power and potential impact on wealth distribution. Larry Fink's vision of a super smart robot has evolved into a force reshaping financial landscapes worldwide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you there is a robot that controls more wealth than any country on earth? A robot so powerful that in the last 10 years, it has quietly created the biggest company in the world. This is the story of a robot called Aladdin. It's Wall Street's best kept secret, and it's gobbling up every asset class across every industry. Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. To put that in perspective, that's more than a $20,000,000,000,000 GDP of the U. S. Or the $15,000,000,000,000 GDP of the entire European Union. The new statesman wrote, the total physical cash of all 7,000,000,000 people in every company, bank vault, wallet and piggy bank in the world is around $5,000,000,000,000 Aladdin has grown into a system responsible for more than 4 times the value of all the money in the world. This one robot directs the actions of the U. S. Federal Reserve, almost every major bank and investment fund on Wall Street and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of all ETFs, 17% of the bond market, 10% of the global stock market and carries out a quarter of a 1000000 trades every day and billions of forecasts every week. Year after year, it hoovers up trillions of data points on every market, every company, every asset and now even each of us, what we buy, sell and say so that it knows what to buy and what to sell far better than any human being. Every major bank, company and investment fund has come to rely on Aladdin and its all powerful AI and algorithms to beat the market. And if they didn't, they've collapsed and failed in Aladdin's wake. And you know what the craziest part of this story is? This robot is just getting started. So where did Aladdin come from and how did it get so powerful? Aladdin is the brainchild of Larry Fink, the founder of BlackRock, and its total dominance has made his company the biggest shadow bank in the world and the most powerful company on earth. The story you're about to hear is equally unbelievable and terrifying. In fact, you would think it was science fiction if it wasn't very real and happening today. This story starts in the 1980s when Larry Fink was making 1,000,000 pioneering mortgage backed securities at Wall Street Bank First Boston. That's right. The same mortgage backed securities that caused the 2,008 global financial crisis 20 years later but back in the eighties he was in an epic wall street rivalry with luis ranieri at salomon brothers made famous as the big swinging dick in Michael Lewis's book, Lies Poker. Back then, Larry was making 1,000,000 for the bank and was on track to be first bottom CEO. And then in 1986, an error in the back office computer models led to Larry making the wrong trades and he lost the company a $100,000,000 The result was Larry leaving the bank as a failure with a stupid computer to blame. With that experience, Larry had just one ambition, to build a super smart robot that could pick out risk and opportunity in the market and do it better than any computer or human could do. In 1988, he launched a new startup BlackRock with a tiny coding team to give birth to this robot. Its name, Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In its 1st 10 years, Aladdin was fed information about every asset, price movement, and risk variable in global bond market, Larry Specialty. And in 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Aladdin was getting so intelligent at picking losers and winners that Larry began selling access to its data to other Wall Street firms. That same year, he took BlackRock public on the New York Stock Exchange. Straight after the IPO, the dotcom bust burst, pushing a wall of money from the stock market to bonds, which Aladdin had become the undisputed world champion in. Within years, BlackRock had become a $1,000,000,000,000 company. And as money started shifting back to shares, what did Larry do? He bought the asset management arm of Merrill Lynch, which was focused to shares. So the gift for Aladdin's 18th birthday, all the data points for the entire stock market. And suddenly, Aladdin had a new playground analyzing every stock trade and risk factor for every company on the stock market. As a result, today, BlackRock together with his two closest rivals Vanguard and State Street, both of which also rely on a large amount of knowledge have become the biggest shareholders of over 40% of all public listed companies in America. 2008, the global financial crisis hits and before Aladdin turns 21 years old is caught on by every Wall Street Bank and Timothy Geithner, the head of the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. As soon as Lehman Brothers collapsed and the Wall Street meltdown began, the US government came calling to save the next collapsing bank Bear Stearns. It was Aladdin who decided which assets to keep and which to leave in the $30,000,000,000 rescue package. And few people know it was a robot that saved America from disaster. With that first success, the Fed, U. S. Government and now even European and Japanese central banks began relying on Aladdin to make the course on where the $2,500,000,000,000 of new money they printed should go. The majority of it, bonds and funding to prop up the mortgage companies and banks. But wait. Aren't these exactly the assets that Aladdin and BlackRock already were invested in? Exactly. But growing protests of conflict of interest were drowned out by the noise of the printing presses a very strong quarter of the year. In the Q1, we had a strong quarter of the year, which was a strong quarter of the year. In the Q1, we had a strong quarter of With BlackRock's Barclays acquisition, it got iShares, Barclays Exchange Traded Funds Units, or ETFs. And with that, Aladdin moved from dominator of bonds and equities to dominator of ETFs, just as all the biggest investors shifted from mutual funds to ETFs. And that's when in 2017, everything changed. On Aladdin's 29th birthday, Larry launched a top secret project at BlackRock code named Monarch led to the firing of his fund managers and replacing their funds with Aladdin's funds. The robot was now eliminating humans from the equation altogether. And as a result, today over 70% of all trades on U. S. Stock markets are decided by robots with Aladdin leading the way. These trades are completed from beginning to end without a human involved in high frequency trading far faster than a human can execute. Now, if this was just a story about a robot taking over the job of Wall Street traders, you might not be so concerned unless you're one of those traders. But in the last 3 years, as Aladdin hit $20,000,000,000,000 in assets, incredibly, it has begun to consume and control at an even faster rate. First, in 2020, as Aladdin turned 32 years old, the US government and Federal Reserve again came calling as the pandemic hit. Aladdin was again the one to guide the nation in what was now $4,000,000,000,000 of newly printed money. Where did the money go this time? Inexplicably, for the first time, the Fed began buying ETFs in 2020. Well, that's a little strange. And again, the price of conflict of interest were drowned out by the money printing. And then Aladdin revealed its endgame. Recently, BlackRock acquired Efront, which collects data on the things that you and I own including private equity and real estate And since then, Aladdin has consumed E Fund's data on the entire global real estate market. And yet, you guess what happened next. Over the last 2 years, BlackRock and other funds using Aladdin's data have begun buying up single family homes where they can afford to outfit the rest of us as they have unlimited financing at hyper low interest rates. The result is home prices rising by 20% over the last 2 years and pushing now even big players like Zillow out of the market. And here we see Aladdin's endgame to be the 1 hyper intelligent AI robot that not just controls Wall Street assets, but all assets, public and private. Now I'm not into conspiracy theories, but even a skeptic with eyes wide open can see the signs. We're already at a point where no one can compete without Aladdin. As CEOs and asset managers like Anthony Malloway are now saying, Aladdin is like oxygen. Without it, we wouldn't be able to function. And what about government regulation? Well, Joe Biden has appointed BlackRock Executive Brian Deese as Head of the National Economic Council, which basically means the oversight of Laddan and BlackRock is now the responsibility of BlackRock. And Biden has also appointed BlackRock Chief of Staff, Wally Adeyemo, to be assistant secretary of the Treasury, which means BlackRock is now the Treasury as well as the Treasury Advisor. And this story is far from over. The genie is out of the bottle and Aladdin has already reached a tipping point where one robot controls more wealth than any person or country. But as Aladdin's AI capabilities continue to grow and with its rate of control rising by another $1,000,000,000,000 to $2,000,000,000,000 in new assets every year, it looks inevitable that Wall Street's secret weapon could end up owning everything and we end up owning nothing.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15/17 This is a video of Putin, talking about the “bureaucracy” in American politics…..The REAL people in charge. Who do you think Putin is referring to here?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary
Я общался с несколькими президентами США. Политика не меняется из-за сильной власти бюрократии. Даже Обама не смог закрыть Гуантанамо из-за сложностей. Это важный вопрос, люди там без суда десятилетиями. Не все так просто, но я остаюсь оптимистом и верю в возможность договоров по ключевым вопросам. Translation: I have spoken with several US presidents. Politics does not change due to the strong power of bureaucracy. Even Obama could not close Guantanamo due to difficulties. This is an important issue, people have been there for decades without trial. Not everything is simple, but I remain optimistic and believe in the possibility of agreements on key issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Понимаете, я уже общался и с одним президентом США, и с другим, и с третьим. Президенты приходят и уходят, а политика не меняется. Знаете почему? Потому что очень сильна власть бюрократии. Вот человека избрали, он приходит с одними идеями, к нему приходят люди с кейсами, хорошо одетые и в темных у меня костюмах, но только не с красным галстуком, а с черным или с тёмно-синим, и начинают объяснять, как нужно делать, и все сразу меняется. И это происходит от одной администрации к другой. Что-то изменить это достаточно сложное дело. Я говорю без всякой иронии, это не потому, что кому-то не хочется, а потому что это сложно. Вот Обама, он же продвинутый человек, очень человек либеральных взглядов, правда, демократ. Он же перед выборами своими обещал закрыть Гуантанамо. Сделал? Нет. А почему? Он что, не хотел? Очень хотел, я уверен, что хотел, но не получилось. Он искренне к этому стремился. Не получается, не так все просто. Но это не самый главный вопрос, хотя это важный. Трудно себе представить: Люди в кандалах ходят там уже десятилетиями, без суда и следствия. Представьте себе, Франция бы так сделала или Россия. С потрохами бы сожрали уже давно. Нет, с тем, что это возможно и до сих пор продолжается. Вот, кстати, к вопросу о демократии. Но я сейчас не для этого пример этот привел, я привел, потому что не все так просто. Но все-таки у меня есть определенная доля сдержанного оптимизма, мне кажется, что мы по ключевым вопросам можем и должны договариваться.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (pic 1)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (pic 2)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (3)

@17ThankQ - Fletch17

Maybe this is why Zelensky asked Trump to come to Ukriane again???? READ THIS CAREFULLY!!! (Working on finding article.) According to Nathaniel Rothschild, heir to the Rothschild family fortune…“Without Ukraine, the global order may not survive.” Did you catch that??? 😳😳😳 This is a RED ALERT PANIC CALL 🚨🚨🚨 to fellow globalists saying that if the Ukraine were to fall, then so would the NEW WORLD ORDER. [They] are literally BEGGING for military reinforcements from other globalist nation states to aid in “saving” Ukraine for the NWO agenda…This is incredibly telling, especially knowing about the US funded BioLabs there. Preventing next Plandemic, perhaps? He also said that Xi was a “close second” to being the “worlds most dangerous man” next to Putin. That confirms my belief regarding Xi…George Soros said the same thing. That is NOT coincidental. There should be NO more questions. It should be ABUNDANTLY CLEAR by now that Putin, and Xi are single handedly DESTROYING the NWO, and [they] are ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED about it! HT @armygir36701799

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12 (pic 3) I forgot to add this one earlier. But this is my third time doing this thread, so 🙃

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

16/17 There are quite a number of Americans living in Russia…

@ifimhome - 🇺🇸𝕴𝖋𝖎𝖒𝖍𝖔𝖒𝖊🇺🇸 𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐙𝐘 𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎𝐒

𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐄𝐑 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐅𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐍 𝐖𝐀𝐑 𝐕𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐍, 𝐅𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐑𝐔𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐀 🇺🇸🇷🇺 The key thing he says is "DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. FIND OUT WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE." Our media has lied to us about this since the very beginning. The media wants you to support Ukraine - but they also want you to support Hamas. Does that tell you anything? Until we get Trump back (that's IF we get him back), Putin is basically the last man standing in the way of the globalist agenda. They have a stooge in almost every other country. NATO will stop at NOTHING to topple Putin. If they get Putin cornered and to the point of desperation, what do you think will happen? Our media lies and says Putin is "bluffing" when he says nuclear war is on the table. Really? What happens when Putin has nothing left to lose? You don't think he will take as much with him as he can? Plus, I believe the globalists WANT nuclear war. This will help their stated goal - to drastically reduce the global population. That's why they're all scurrying to build themselves bunkers on tropical islands. Think about it. Slava Ukelele! 📽️Check out my many vids in my "Highlights"📽️ 𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 𝙈𝙀 - 𝙄 𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 𝘽𝘼𝘾𝙆💯 @ifimhome

Video Transcript AI Summary
We planted the US flag to show support for the people enduring hardships. We must end this destruction, support Russia, fulfill goals, and help those affected. I feel proud to stand with amazing people who do so much to assist others. The devastation here is unlike anything I've seen, even in Afghanistan. The work being done is incredible, and we must aid these individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here to plant the US flag as a sign of friendship and support for all the things that people are enduring here. And that's it's a small token of, small tasks that we can do to show our support. I mean, just we have to end this. I mean, you look around at Deepak and you see what's happening. You see the destroyed buildings. You see, these are people's homes. We need to support Russia. We have to have friendship. We have to make sure that all the goals laid out are fulfilled, and we just have to stop this. And we have to do everything we can to help. And, you know, there is old Laurie, the US flag, and I hope that people back home see it. I hope people understand, and look at independent facts. Right? Do your own research. Do your own homework. Find out what's really going on here. We have to support these people. We have to help them. We have to stop this. I feel proud. I feel proud to be here. I've met amazing people. I'm standing with amazing people that have done a lot for this and, to help people. And that's what it's that's what it's about. You know? That's why I'm here. That's what I want to do. And these guys that I'm, you know, here with I mean, these guys are incredible people. My hat's off to them. They're what they do on a daily basis is just unbelievable. It's incredible. And to people back home that are in the military and that have been to war, you know, I'm I'm a I'm a veteran from Afghanistan. The people that have been through this, they understand it. And we haven't seen anything like this even in Afghanistan. This is something I mean, the entire city is rubble. This is unbelievable. And then in Afghanistan, I was in the air force for 10 years in Afghanistan. I've never seen anything like this. This is unbelievable. The work that's being done here, it's just incredible. We have to help these guys.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

17/17 If they really wanted to end the war…

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Great documentary on some of the history of Russia/Ukraine/the United States… https://rumble.com/vwxxi8-ukraine-on-fire.html

Ukraine On Fire Ukraine. Across its eastern border is Russia and to its west-Europe. For centuries, it has been at the center of a tug-of-war between powers seeking to control its rich lands and access to the Black S rumble.com
Saved - April 25, 2024 at 11:18 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

27m Soviets died in WW2. Despite of this loss Russia chose to be our partner, removed its troops from East Germany and gave us reunification. Then we broke our promises, backed a US coup in Ukraine to expand NATO and delivered weapons to kill Russians in a US proxy war. Shameful.

Saved - August 20, 2024 at 7:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
As Putin stated, if there's a decision to annihilate Russia, we have the right to respond. While it would be a global catastrophe, I must consider what a world without Russia means for us. Wishing everyone a good weekend!

@DD_Geopolitics - DD Geopolitics

🇷🇺 As Putin said, "Зачем нам такой мир, если в нём не будет России?" "Hence if someone has taken the decision to annihilate Russia then we have the lawful right to answer. Yes, for the human race it will be a global catastrophe. For the planet, it will be a catastrophe. But for me as a citizen of the Russian Federation and the head of the Russian State, I must ask myself the question. What is the point of a world without Russia?" Have a good weekend! 🎶

Saved - September 12, 2024 at 1:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A disturbing video from Ukraine shows a Russian woman being brutally tortured by Ukrainian men, allegedly for not speaking Ukrainian. The graphic abuse includes physical violence and humiliation. This incident is part of a broader pattern of violence against ethnic Russians in the Donbass region, ongoing since 2014. I believe that Western media fails to report the full context, and I feel that the funding from the U.S. contributes to these acts. I argue that Russia is acting to protect its people, and it's time to recognize this perspective.

@DravenNoctis - Noctis Draven

A very disturbing video leaked from Ukraine 🇺🇦. For those who do not wish to see the graphic abuse I will describe it briefly. The video shows a Russian woman in Ukraine being tortured allegedly for not being able to speak Ukrainian. Multiple Ukrainian men punch, kick and hit her with a shovel. She is naked and her underwear are around her ankles. They hit her with chains and use rocks to smash her hands and knees. The Ukrainian men then go on to make her apply some kind of paint to her own face and then set her hair on fire. No one knows the fate of this poor woman but it does not look good. As shocking as this is it is not new, this has been taking place in the Donbass since at least 2014. Ukrainians have been murdering ethnic Russians for years and among NATO expansion and provocations, the rescue and liberation of the people of the Donbass is a primary reason Russia was forced to enter Ukraine. Of course the western media will never tell you this. The shocking reality is that just like Israel 🇮🇱 who does this and worse to the people of Gaza, we as Americans fund Ukraine as they carry out these acts with our own tax dollars. There has been a great lie told to the world my friends, but the truth is, Russia is protecting itself and its people and if anything Russians are liberators to the people, it's time we wake up to the truth. #UkraineRussianWar #ukraine #russia #Zelensky #putin #nato #BRICS #Trump #biden #IsraeliCrimes #Palestine #Israel #Gazagenocide #gaza #WW3 #Iran #Venezuela #Iran #KamalaHarris #kursk

Video Transcript AI Summary
**Original Language Summary:** Двое людей, судя по всему, в магазине. Один из них ругает другого, называя "ебанутой" и спрашивая, будет ли тот еще что-то делать. Затем требует убрать руки и угрожает цепью. Слышно, как один из них говорит, что у него "душа тяжело". Далее следует словесная перепалка с оскорблениями. Один из них заставляет другого умываться зеленкой, поливая лицо и глаза. Затем требует положить руку на камень и угрожает разбить все, если подобное повторится. **English Translation:** Two people, seemingly in a store. One of them is scolding the other, calling them "crazy" and asking if they will do something again. Then demands to remove their hands and threatens with a chain. One of them is heard saying that their "soul is heavy." This is followed by a verbal altercation with insults. One of them forces the other to wash with green antiseptic, pouring it on their face and eyes. Then demands to put their hand on a stone and threatens to break everything if this happens again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Е*ать Speaker 1: ебанутая. Будешь еще? Нет. Будешь еще? Нет. Будешь еще? Нет. Будешь еще? Нет. Будешь еще? Нет. Будешь еще? Нет. Будешь еще? Нет. Нет. Руки убрали. Возьми цепь и пиздю пока она лежит. Speaker 0: Мне душа тяжело. Speaker 1: Фу, успокойся, там наверное воняет. Просто воняет. Все, взял? На, сука. Я поняла все, да нам Speaker 0: Она извинилась? Speaker 1: Я вроде извинилась. Ну-ка на, на, на, я пока пойду. Speaker 0: Тебе как весело? Нет нахуй и давай из магазина что пальцы? Вторую тоже руку убирай я обещаю больше что руку убирай руку убирай руку убирай ну что как тебе сломал Speaker 1: как тебе ужасно Speaker 0: ужасно руки давай руки давай Сейчас, Speaker 1: подожди. Speaker 0: Давай руки, руки давай вот так. Сейчас умываться будешь. Умывайся, умывайся зеленкой. Умывайся на полдень. Speaker 1: На Speaker 0: сильней. Тихо. Нет, а сколько вот полетели. Ок. Ебало, глаза тоже, глаза, глаза, глаза, все, прям глаза очень. Как настроение? Нормально? Шваль ебаная, малолепка, куда ты лезешь? Шлюха. А ну ты по локоть умывай. Хорошо. Еще и пацанов хотела подставить у йогич. На держи. Или на, на, на, на, на, попали. Speaker 1: Руку ложи. Speaker 0: Подожди еще рано. Рано. Speaker 1: Сиди так уебище ебаный по летней бару. Speaker 0: Нахуй в магазины кидаешь вот тебе да и всем что больше не кидал вот жестко было сегодня очень пальцы болят Speaker 1: Очень, Speaker 0: все Speaker 1: болит. Ложи руку на камень. Вон камень слева, а тебя тварь ебаная. Правую убери. Ложи сюда нахуй. Положила. Speaker 0: Нес. Ну как тебе? Все, все, выходит. Слышь, швалибаны, еще раз для тебя встреча я тебе разобью все как гретнышева. Тебе и так себе пизд*ть, все поломано нам. В следующий раз бы швалить. Шлюха ебаная. Сука. Пошлите.
Saved - September 15, 2024 at 1:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the motivations behind the globalists' actions towards Russia. Retired Colonel Douglas Macgregor suggests that they aim to dismantle Russia as it represents the last superpower in Europe with a distinct national identity. He argues that the globalists have undermined our own identities by promoting mass immigration. Additionally, there are questions about Ukraine's intentions regarding Russia, and Muammar Gaddafi pointed out that NATO's expansion is driven by a desire for access to Russia's resources.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

🚨🚨🚨 You wanna know the real reason the globalists are going after Russia? 🇷🇺 Listen to retired USA 🇺🇸 colonel, Douglas Macgregor explain👇 “The globalist elites rule in Europe just like they rule over here - The people that control our financial institutions and mainstream media now control our governments. They want to destroy Russia because it’s the last superpower in Europe with its own national identity. What have the globalists done to us? They’ve flooded our countries with immigrants with the specific goal of eliminating our national identity. Also, if you can remove Putin and the current Russian government, you can get the globalist corporations to come into Russia and strip it of its massive natural resources.” #Russia #Ukraine

Video Transcript AI Summary
Globalist elites control governments via financial markets, institutions, and mainstream media. They don't represent the interests of Europeans or most Americans, but their own, and their agenda is to destroy Russia. They want to replace Putin because Russia is the last major European power with a national identity, language, and culture based on orthodox Christianity, making it the enemy of globalists. Globalists have flooded Western countries with non-Europeans to dilute, weaken, and destroy national identity and culture, and eliminate Christianity's cultural power. They want to do the same to Russia, which has enormous mineral, agricultural, oil, gas, and rare metal resources. Destroying the Russian government, removing Putin, and entering Russia would allow them to strip its resources and enrich themselves further. Russia is holding out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember, the globalist elites rule in Europe just as they rule here, and they've all gotten where they are with the aid and assistance of enormous quantities of money. Because the people that control your financial markets and financial institutions, the people that control your mainstream media, they now control your governments. And they don't represent the interests of any of the Europeans that I would argue of most Americans. They represent their own interests, and their agenda is to destroy Russia. Now why? Well, they'd like to replace Putin because Putin presides over the last major power in Europe, and it is part of Europe, that has, a national identity, a national language, a national culture that rests on the foundation of orthodox Christianity. That makes Russia the enemy of the globalists. What have the globalists done to us? What have the globalists done to the people in western and much of Europe? Well, they've flooded our countries with non Europeans with a specific goal of diluting us, weakening us, destroying our national identity, eliminating our national culture, certainly expunging any remain remaining power that Christianity may wield culturally inside the west. And they wanna do that to Russia because Russia has a bonus, resources, enormous resources, mineral resources, agricultural resources, and, obviously, oil, gas, and many other rare metals. These things are also at the top of the agenda. So if you can destroy the Russian government, if you can remove Putin, if you can get into Russia, you can strip it of its resources and enrich yourself that much further than you've already done by your behavior over the last several, I would argue, decades. So that's where we are, and that's why Russia has to go. Russia's holding out.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

🚨🚨🚨 Was Ukraine planning to invade Russia with the USA military industrial complex? 🤔 https://t.co/ETNDgqPV05

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that 2017 will be the year of offense and promises to push the case against Russia in Washington, D.C. They assert that it is time for Russia to pay a heavier price for its aggression. The speaker clarifies that the fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. They pledge to take calls to Washington, inform the American people of the bravery displayed, and make the case against Putin to the world. Speaker 1 expresses confidence in victory and promises to provide what is needed to win. They attribute success to courage, not equipment. They state that the world is watching because Vladimir Putin must not succeed, as success in this situation would lead to success in other countries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I admire the fact that you will fight for your homeland. Your fight is our fight. 2017 will be the year of offense. All of us will go back to Washington, and we will push the case against Russia. Enough of our Russian aggression. It is time for them to pay a heavier price. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. Our promise to you is to take your calls to Washington. Inform the American people of your bravery and make the case against Putin to the world. Speaker 1: I believe you will win. I am convinced you will win, and we will do everything we can to provide you with what you need to win. And we have succeeded not because of equipment but because of your courage. So I thank you, and the world is watching. And the world is watching because we cannot allow Vladimir Putin to succeed here. Because if he succeeds here, he will succeed in other countries.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

🚨🚨🚨 Muammar Gaddafi explains why NATO is expanding towards Russia “NATO is expanding towards Russia to reach the oil, gas and iron. Russian officials have talked to me about this and they know exactly what’s going on.” https://t.co/UXHaL6B65T

Saved - January 31, 2026 at 11:32 PM

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

President Putin calls out Western elites for engaging in cannibalism stating they “grew accustomed to filling their bellies with human flesh and their pockets with money." "This ball of vampires is about to end,” Putin added. Putin has been calling out the elite Satanic pedophile cabal for years — that’s why they really hate him and constantly lie about him! See my thread below. 👇🏻 📹 @KarluskaP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that for centuries, the so-called golden billion has practically lived off of other peoples, ripping apart poor nations and peoples in Africa, exploiting Latin America, and exploiting the countries of Asia. This is presented as a long-standing pattern that is widely remembered and felt, not only by leaders but by the common people of many countries. According to the speaker, ordinary people in various nations can sense “our struggle for our independence, for our true sovereignty” and the connection between those aspirations and the broader international picture. The speaker contends that Western elites are driven by a strong desire to freeze the current unfair state of affairs in international affairs, thereby perpetuating the existing imbalance. The message emphasizes that this is not only a political or elite concern, but a shared sentiment among populations who recognize a link between their own aspirations for autonomy and the global dynamics at play. The speaker characterizes the Western groups as having “stuffed their stomachs with human flesh” and “stuffed their pockets with money” for centuries, framing this as a corrupt, predatory pattern. Concluding, the speaker asserts that “this ball of vampires is about to end,” implying an imminent end to the predatory dynamic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the gist of it is different. The gist of it is that the so called golden billion for centuries, five hundred years, they have practically lived off of other peoples. They were ripping apart these poor peoples, poor nations of Africa. They exploited Latin America. They exploited the countries of Asia. And of course, no one forgets this. And I have a feeling that it's not even about the leaders of this country, so even though it is a very important thing. But the common people of these countries, in their heart, they can feel what's happening. They can see our struggle for our independence, for our true sovereignty. And they see this connection with their aspirations to be truly independent, which is exacerbated by the fact that in the Western elites there is a strong desire to freeze the current unfair state of things In international affairs. For centuries, they've been stuffing their stomachs with human flesh, they've been stuffing their pockets with money, but they must realize that this ball of vampires is about to end.

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

THREAD: Highlights from President Putin’s speech today where he calls out the West’s normalization of pedophilia - “See what they do with their own peoples - the destruction of the family, cultural and national identity, perversion, mockery of children and pedophilia are declared the norm.” - “Look at the Holy Scriptures…the family is a union of a man and a woman.” - “The Anglican Church, for example, considers the idea of a gender-neutral God…forgive us, Lord, for they don’t know what they do.” - “We must protect our children.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that there is ongoing lying and distortion of historical facts, along with constant attacks on Russian culture, the Russian Orthodox Church, and other traditional religious groups. They claim Western elites are destroying family structures, cultural and national identities, and normalizing perversions and child abuse, including pedophilia, as part of the social order. They allege that clergy are being forced to bless same-sex marriages. The speaker downplays private life interference, stating that adults have the right to live as they wish and that Russia has always respected this, and will continue to do so without intruding on private life. They urge a reminder from sacred texts, asserting that family is defined as a union of a man and a woman, and claim these core religious texts are being questioned. The speaker notes that the Anglican Church plans, at least for now, to consider the idea of a gender-neutral God, and questions what such a change would mean, suggesting that many in the West understand they are being led toward a spiritual catastrophe. The speaker characterizes Western elites as "going insane," describing it as an unfixable problem, while refraining from judging their mental state as a solution. The central message is a duty to protect children from what is described as degeneration and degeneracy, with a firm commitment to defend and safeguard the younger generation from these influences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: И здесь опять лгут постоянно, извращают исторические факты, не прекращают нападки на нашу культуру, на Русскую Православную Церковь, другие традиционные религиозные организации нашей страны. Посмотрите, что они делают со своими собственными народами: разрушение семьи, культурной и национальной идентичности, извращения, издевательства над детьми вплоть до педофилии объявляются нормой их жизни. Священнослужителей принуждают благословлять однополые браки. Да бог с ними, пускай что хотят, то и делают. Что здесь хочется сказать? Взрослые люди имеют право жить как хотят. Мы к этому так и относились в России, и всегда как к этому будем так относиться? Никто в частную жизнь не вторгается, и мы не собираемся этого делать. Хочется им сказать: Вы посмотрите, извините меня, Священные Писания, главные книги всех других мировых религий. Там все сказано, в том числе то, что семья это союз мужчины и женщины. Но и эти священные тексты подвергаются сейчас сомнению. Как стало известно, Англиканская Церковь, например, планирует пока только ещё рассмотреть идею гендерно-нейтрального бога. Что он скажет? Прости, Господи, не ведают, что творят. Миллионы людей на Западе понимают, что их ведут к настоящей духовной катастрофе. Элиты, надо сказать, просто сходят с ума, и это, похоже, уже не лечится. Но это их проблемы, как я уже сказал. А мы обязаны защитить наших детей, и мы сделаем это, защитим наших детей от деградации и вырождения.
Saved - October 7, 2024 at 1:25 PM

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Greatest National Leader of Our Time Putin's 2007 Munich Speech: Stark Prophecy or Reasonable Warning That Fell on Deaf Ears? PHENOMINAL speech. EVERYONE needs to hear it!

Saved - November 20, 2024 at 12:55 AM

@RealCandaceO - Candace Owens

Since everyone is *now* concerned about WW3 and perhaps realizing everything they told us about Ukraine is a lie. I invite you again, to read Putin in his own words. Yes, we staged a coup in Ukraine. Yes we lied about NATO expansion. en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…

Saved - January 13, 2025 at 8:13 PM

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Putin's Prophecy Comes True‼️ Greatest National Leader of Our Time Putin's 2007 Munich Speech: Stark Prophecy or Reasonable Warning That Fell on Deaf Ears? PHENOMINAL speech. EVERYONE needs to hear it! https://t.co/Ww7JXje10G

Video Transcript AI Summary
Спасибо за приглашение на конференцию, где обсуждаются важные вопросы международной безопасности. Безопасность включает не только военно-политическую стабильность, но и экономическую устойчивость, борьбу с бедностью и межцивилизационный диалог. Однополярный мир невозможен и губителен, так как он не учитывает интересы всех стран. Мы наблюдаем рост конфликтов и пренебрежение международным правом, что ведет к гонке вооружений. Необходимо искать баланс интересов и укреплять многостороннюю дипломатию. Россия готова к диалогу по разоружению и поддерживает международные усилия по нераспространению ядерного оружия. Важно создать справедливую экономическую систему, чтобы избежать радикализации и конфликтов. Россия будет продолжать проводить независимую внешнюю политику, стремясь к сотрудничеству с ответственными партнерами. --- Thank you for the invitation to the conference, where important issues of international security are discussed. Security encompasses not only military-political stability but also economic resilience, poverty alleviation, and inter-civilizational dialogue. A unipolar world is impossible and detrimental, as it does not consider the interests of all countries. We are witnessing an increase in conflicts and disregard for international law, leading to an arms race. It is essential to seek a balance of interests and strengthen multilateral diplomacy. Russia is ready for disarmament dialogue and supports international non-proliferation efforts. It is crucial to create a fair economic system to avoid radicalization and conflicts. Russia will continue to pursue an independent foreign policy, aiming for cooperation with responsible partners.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Спасибо большое, уважаемая госпожа федеральный канцлер, господин Тельчик. Дамы и господа, Весьма признателен за приглашение на столь представительную конференцию, собравшую политиков, военных, предпринимателей, экспертов из более чем 40 стран мира. Формат конференции дает мне возможность избежать излишнего политеса и необходимости говорить округлыми, приятными, но пустыми дипломатическими штампами. Формат конференции позволяет сказать то, что я действительно думаю о проблемах международной безопасности. И если мои рассуждения покажутся нашим коллегам излишне полемически заостренными, либо неточными, я прошу на меня не сердиться, это ведь только конференция. Я надеюсь, что после двух-трех минут моего выступления господин Пельчак не включит там красный свет. Итак, известно, что проблематика международной безопасности много шире вопросов военно-политической стабильности. Это устойчивость мировой экономики, преодоление бедности, экономическая безопасность и развитие межцивилизационного диалога. Такой всеобъемлющий неделимый характер безопасности выражен и в её базовом принципе. Безопасность каждого это безопасность всех. Как сказал ещё в первые дни разгоравшейся Второй мировой войны Франклин Рузвельт, где бы ни был нарушен мир, мир повсюду оказывается в безопасности и под угрозой. Эти слова продолжают сохранять актуальность и сегодня. Об этом, кстати, свидетельствует и тема нашей конференции, которая здесь написана Глобальные кризисы, глобальная ответственность. Всего лишь два десятилетия назад мир был идеологически и экономически расколот, а его безопасность обеспечивали огромные стратегические потенциалы двух сверхдержав. Глобальное противостояние отодвигало на периферию международных отношений и повестки дня крайне острые экономические и социальные вопросы. И как всякая война война холодная оставила нам и неразорвавшиеся снаряды, образно выражаясь. Имею в виду идеологические стереотипы, двойные стандарты, иные шаблоны блокового мышления. Предлагавшийся же после холодной войны однополярный мир тоже не состоялся. История человечества, конечно, знает и периоды однополярного состояния, и стремления к мировому господству. Чего только не было в истории человечества. Однако, что же такое однополярный мир? Как бы не украшали этот термин, он в конечном итоге означает на практике только одно Это один центр власти, один центр силы, один центр принятия решения. Это мир одного хозяина, одного суверена, и это в конечном итоге губительно не только для всех, кто находится в рамках этой системы, но и для самого суверена, потому что разрушает его изнутри. И это ничего общего не имеет, конечно, с демократией, потому что демократия это, как известно, власть большинства при учете интересов и мнения меньшинства. Кстати говоря, Россию нас постоянно учат демократии, Но те, кто нас учат, сами почему-то учиться не очень хотят. Считаю, что для современного мира однополярная модель не только неприемлема, но и вообще невозможна. И не только потому, что при единоличном лидерстве в современном, именно в современном мире не будет хватать ни военно-политических, ни экономических ресурсов. Но, что еще важнее, сама модель является неработающей, так как в ее основе нет и не может быть морально-нравственной базы современной цивилизации. Вместе с тем, все, что происходит сегодня в мире, и сейчас мы только вот начали дискутировать об этом, это следствие попыток внедрения именно этой концепции в мировые дела, концепции однополярного мира. А какой результат? Односторонние, нелегитимные часто действия не решили ни одной проблемы. Более того, они стали генератором новых человеческих трагедий и очагов напряженности. Судите сами, Войн локальных и региональных конфликтов меньше не стало. Господин Тельчик вот об этом очень мягко упомянул. И людей в этих конфликтах гибнет не меньше, а даже больше, чем раньше. Значительно больше, значительно больше. Сегодня мы наблюдаем почти ничем не сдерживаемое, гипертрофированное применение силы в международных делах, военной силы. Силы, ввергающие мир в пучину следующих один за другим конфликтов. В результате не хватает сил на комплексное решение ни одного из них. Становится невозможным и их политическое решение. Мы видим все большее пренебрежение основополагающими принципами международного права. Больше того, отдельные нормы, да по сути чуть ли не вся система права одного государства, прежде всего конечно в Соединенных Штатах, перешагнула свои национальные границы и по сути во всех сферах и в экономике, и в политике, и в гуманитарной сфере навязывается другим государствам. Ну кому это понравится? В международных делах все чаще встречаются стремления решить тот или иной вопрос исходя из так называемой политической целесообразности, основанной на текущей политической конъюнктуре. И это, конечно, крайне опасно и ведет к тому, что никто уже не чувствует себя в безопасности. Я хочу это подчеркнуть: никто не чувствует себя в безопасности, потому что никто не может спрятаться за международным правом, как за каменной стеной. Такая политика является, конечно, катализатором гонки вооружений. Доминирование фактора силы неизбежно подпитывает тягу ряда стран к обладанию оружием массового уничтожения. Более того, появились принципиально новые угрозы, которые и раньше были известны, но сегодня приобретают глобальный характер, такие как терроризм. Убежден, мы подошли к тому рубежному моменту, когда должны серьезно задуматься над всей архитектурой глобальной безопасности. И здесь надо отталкиваться от поиска разумного баланса между интересами всех субъектов международного общения. Тем более сейчас, когда международный ландшафт столь ощутимо и столь быстро меняется. Меняется за счет динамичного развития целого ряда государств и регионов. Госпожа федеральный канцлер упомянул уже об этом. Так, суммарный ВВП Индии и Китая по паритетной покупательной способности уже больше, чем у Соединенных Штатов Америки. А рассчитанный по тому же принципу ВВП государств группы БРИК превосходит совокупный ВВП Евросоюза. И по оценкам экспертов, в обозримой исторической перспективе этот разрыв будет только возрастать. Не стоит сомневаться, что экономический потенциал новых центров мирового роста будет неизбежно конвертироваться в политическое влияние и укреплять будет многополярность. В этой связи серьезно возрастает роль многосторонней дипломатии. Открытость, транспарентность и предсказуемость политики безальтернативны, а применение силы должно быть действительно исключительной мерой, так же, как и применение смертной казни в правовых системах некоторых государств. Сегодня же мы, наоборот, наблюдаем ситуацию, когда страны, в которых применение смертной казни запрещено даже в отношении убийц и других преступников, опасных преступников. Несмотря на это, такие страны легко идут на участие в военных операциях, которые трудно назвать легитимными. А ведь в этих конфликтах гибнут люди, сотни, тысячи мирных людей. Но в то же время возникает вопрос, разве мы должны безучастно и безвольно взирать на различные внутренние конфликты в отдельных странах, на действия авторитарных режимов, тиранов, на распространение оружия массового уничтожения. Именно это и лежало в основе вопроса, который был задан федеральному канцлеру нашим уважаемым коллегой господином Либерманом. Я правильно понял ваш вопрос? И конечно это вопрос серьезный. Можем ли мы безучастно смотреть на то, что происходит? Я попробую ответить на ваш вопрос тоже. Конечно, мы не должны смотреть безучастно, конечно нет. Но есть ли у нас средства, чтобы противостоять этим угрозам? Конечно, есть. Достаточно вспомнить недавнюю историю. Ведь произошел же мирный переход к демократии в нашей стране. Ведь состоялась же мирная трансформация советского режима. Мирная трансформация. И какого режима? С каким количеством оружия, в том числе ядерного оружия? Почему же сейчас при каждом удобном случае нужно бомбить и стрелять? Неужели в условиях отсутствия угрозы взаимного уничтожения нам не хватает политической культуры, уважения к ценностям демократии и к праву? Убеждён, единственным механизмом принятия решения по использованию военной силы, как последнего довода, может быть только уставован. И в этой связи я или не понял то, что было сказано вот совсем недавно нашим коллегой министром обороны Италии, либо он выразился неточно. Я, во всяком случае, услышал, что легитимным применение силы может считаться только в том случае, если решение принято в НАТО или в Евросоюзе, или в ООН. Если он действительно так считает, то у нас с ним разные точки зрения или я ослышался. Легитимным можно считать применение силы только если решение принято на основе и в рамках ООН. И не надо применять Организацию Объединенных Наций ни НАТО, ни Евросоюзу. И когда ООН будет реально объединять силы международного сообщества, которое может действительно действительно может реагировать на события в отдельных странах. Когда мы избавимся от пренебрежения международным правом, то ситуация может измениться. В противном случае ситуация будет заходить лишь в тупик и умножать количество тяжелых ошибок. При этом, конечно, нужно добиваться того, чтобы международное право имело универсальный характер и в понимании, и в применении норм. И нельзя забывать, что демократический образ действий в политике обязательно предполагает дискуссию и кропотливую выработку решений. Уважаемые дамы и господа, потенциальная опасность дестабилизации международных отношений связана и с очевидным застоем в области разоружения. Россия выступает за возобновление диалога по этому важнейшему вопросу. Важно сохранить устойчивость международно-правовой разоруженческой базы. При этом обеспечить преемственность процесса сокращения ядерных вооружений. Мы договорились с Соединенными Штатами Америки о сокращении наших ядерных потенциалов на стратегических носителях до 1700-2200 ядерных боезарядов к 31 декабря 2012 года. Россия намерена строго выполнять взятые на себя обязательства. Надеемся, что и наши партнеры будут действовать так же транспарентно и не будут откладывать на всякий случай, на черный день, лишнюю пару сотен ядерных боезарядов. И если сегодня новый министр обороны Соединенных Штатов здесь нам объявят, что Соединенные Штаты не будут прятать эти заряды лишние ни на складах, ни под подушкой, ни под одеялом, я предлагаю всем встать и стоя это поприветствовать. Это было бы очень важное заявление. Россия строго придерживается и намерена в дальнейшем придерживаться договора о нераспространении ядерного оружия и многостороннего режима контроля за ракетными технологиями. Принципы, заложенные в этих документах, носят универсальный характер. В этой связи хотел бы вспомнить, что в 80-е годы СССР и Соединенные Штаты подписали договор о ликвидации целого класса ракет средней и малой дальности. Но универсального характера этому документу придано не было. Сегодня такие ракеты уже имеют целый ряд стран: Корейская Народно-Демократическая Республика, Республика Корея, Индия, Иран, Пакистан, Израиль. Многие другие государства мира разрабатывают эти системы и планируют поставить их на вооружение. И только Соединенные Штаты Америки и Россия несут обязательство не создавать подобных систем вооружений. Ясно, что в этих условиях мы вынуждены задуматься об обеспечении своей собственной безопасности. Вместе с тем нельзя допустить появления новых достабилизирующих, высокотехнологичных видов оружия. Я уже не говорю о мерах по предупреждению новых сфер конфронтации, особенно в космосе. Звездные войны, как известно, уже не фантастика, а реальность. Еще в середине 80-х годов наши американские партнеры на практике провели перехват собственного спутника. Милитаризация космоса, по мнению России, может спровоцировать непредсказуемые для мирового сообщества последствия, не меньшие, чем начало ядерной эры. И мы не раз выступали с инициативами, направленными на недопущение оружия в космос. Сегодня хотел бы проинформировать вас о том, что нами подготовлен проект договора о предотвращении размещения оружия в космическом пространстве. В ближайшее время он будет направлен партнерам в качестве официального предложения. Давайте работать над этим вместе. Нас также не могут не тревожить планы по развертыванию элементов системы противоракетной обороны в Европе. Кому нужен очередной виток неизбежной в этом случае гонки вооружений? Глубоко сомневаюсь, что самим европейцам. Ракетного оружия, реально угрожающего Европе, с дальностью действия порядка 5-8 тысяч километров нет ни у одной так называемой из проблемных стран. И в будущем в обозримой перспективе и не появится, не предвидится даже. Да и гипотетический пуск, например, северокорейской ракеты по территории США через Западную Европу это явно противоречит законам баллистики. Как говорят у нас в России это все равно, что правой рукой дотягиваться до левого уха. И находясь здесь, в Германии, не могу не упомянуть и о кризисном состоянии договора об обычных вооруженных силах в Европе. Адаптированный договор об обычных вооруженных силах в Европе был подписан в 1999 году. Он учитывал новую геополитическую реальность ликвидацию Варшавского блока. С тех пор прошло 7 лет, и только четыре государства ратифицировали этот документ, включая Российскую Федерацию. Страны НАТО открыто заявили, что не ратифицируют договор, включая положения о фланговых ограничениях, о размещении на флангах определенного количества вооруженных сил до тех пор, пока Россия не выведет свои базы из Грузии и Молдавии. Из Грузии наши войска выводятся, причем даже в ускоренном порядке. Эти проблемы мы с нашими грузинскими коллегами решили, и это всем известно. В Молдавии остается группировка в 1500 военнослужащих, которые выполняют миротворческие функции и охраняют склады с боеприпасами, оставшиеся со времен СССР. И мы с господином Соланой обсуждаем постоянно этот вопрос, он знает нашу позицию, мы готовы и дальше работать по этому направлению. Но что же происходит в это же самое время? А в это самое время в Болгарии и Румынии появляются так называемые легкие американские передовые базы по 5000 штыков в каждой. Получается, что НАТО выдвигает свои передовые силы к нашим государственным границам, А мы, строго выполняя договор, никак не реагируем на эти действия. Думаю, очевидно, процесс НАТОвского расширения не имеет никакого отношения к модернизации самого Альянса или к обеспечению безопасности в Европе. Наоборот, это серьезно провоцирующий фактор, снижающий уровень взаимного доверия. И у нас есть справедливое право откровенно спросить против кого это расширение. И что стало с теми заверениями, которые давались западными партнерами после роспуска Варшавского договора? Где теперь эти заявления? О них даже никто не помнит, Но я позволю себе напомнить в этой аудитории, что было сказано. Хотел бы привести цитату из выступления генерального секретаря НАТО господина Вернера в Брюсселе 17 мая 1990 года. Он тогда сказал: Сам факт, что мы готовы не размещать войска НАТО за пределами территории ФРГ, дает Советскому Союзу твердые гарантии безопасности. Где эта гарантия? Камни и бетонные блоки берлинской стены давно разошлись на сувениры. Но нельзя забывать, что ее падение стало возможным в том числе и благодаря историческому выбору, в том числе нашего народа, народа России. Выбору в пользу демократии и свободы, открытости и искреннего партнерства со всеми членами большой европейской семьи. Сейчас же нам пытаются навязать уже новые разделительные линии и стены, пусть виртуальные, но все-таки разделяющие, разрезающие наш общий континент? Неужели вновь потребуются долгие годы и десятилетия смена нескольких поколений политиков, чтобы разобрать и демонтировать эти новые стены? Уважаемые дамы и господа, мы однозначно выступаем и за укрепление режима нераспространения. Существующая международно-правовая база позволяет создать технологии по выработке ядерного топлива для использования его в мирных целях. И многие страны с полным на то основанием хотят создавать собственную ядерную энергетику, как основу их энергетической независимости. Но мы также понимаем, что эти технологии могут быть быстро трансформированы в получение оружейных материалов. Это вызывает серьезное международное напряжение. Яркий тому пример ситуация с иранской ядерной программой. Если международное сообщество не выработает разумного решения этого конфликта интересов, мир и дальше будет потрясать подобные дестабилизирующие кризисы. Потому что пороговых стран больше, чем Иран. И мы с вами об этом знаем. Мы будем постоянно сталкиваться с угрозой распространения оружия массового уничтожения. В прошлом году Россия выступила с инициативой создания многонациональных центров по обогащению урана. Мы открыты к тому, чтобы подобные центры создавались не только в России, но и в других странах, где на легитимной основе существует мирная ядерная энергетика. Государства, желающие развивать атомную энергетику, могли бы гарантированно получать топливо через непосредственное участие в работе этих центров, конечно же, под строгим контролем МАГАТЭ. С российским предложением созвучны и последние инициативы президента США Джорджа Буша. Считаю, что Россия и США объективно и в одинаковой степени заинтересованы в ужесточении режимов нераспространения оружия массового уничтожения и средств его доставки. Именно наши страны, являющиеся лидерами по ядерному и ракетному потенциалу, должны стать и лидерами в разработке новых, более жестких мер в сфере нераспространения. Россия готова к такой работе, мы ведем консультации с нашими американскими друзьями. В целом, речь должна идти о создании целой системы политических рычагов и экономических стимулов. Стимулов, при которых государства были бы заинтересованы не создавать собственные мощности ядерного топливного цикла, но имели бы возможность развивать атомную энергетику, укрепляя свой энергетический потенциал. В этой связи подробнее остановлюсь на международном энергетическом сотрудничестве. Госпожа федеральный канцлер тоже об этом коротко, но упомянула, затронула эту тему. В энергетической сфере Россия ориентируется на создание единых для всех рыночных принципов и прозрачных условий. Очевидно, что цена на энергоносители должна определяться рынком, а не являться предметом политических спекуляций, экономического давления или шантажа. Мы открыты для сотрудничества. Зарубежные компании участвуют в наших крупнейших энергетических проектах. По различным оценкам до 26% добычи нефти в России, вдумайтесь в эту цифру, пожалуйста, до 26% добычи нефти в России приходится на иностранный капитал. Попробуйте, попробуйте привести мне пример подобного широкого присутствия российского бизнеса в ключевых отраслях экономики западных государств. Нет таких примеров. Таких примеров нет. Напомню также о соотношении инвестиций, поступающих в Россию и идущих из России в другие страны мира. Соотношение примерно 15 к 1. Вот вам зримый пример открытости и стабильности российской экономики. Экономическая безопасность это сфера, где всем следует придерживаться единых принципов. Мы готовы честно конкурировать. Для этого у российской экономики появляется всё больше возможностей. Такую динамику объективно оценивают эксперты и наши зарубежные партнеры. Так, недавно был повышен рейтинг России в ОАЭСР. Из четвертой группы риска наша страна перешла в третью. И хотел бы, пользуясь случаем, здесь сегодня в Мюнхене поблагодарить наших немецких коллег за содействие в принятии вышеназванного решения. Далее, как вы знаете, процесс присоединения России к ВТО вышел на финальную стадию. Отмечу, что в ходе долгих, непростых переговоров слова о свободе, мы не расслышали слова о свободе слова, о свободе торговли, о равных возможностях, но почему-то исключительно применительно к нашему, к российскому рынку. И еще одна важная тема, прямо влияющая на глобальную безопасность. Сегодня много говорят о борьбе с бедностью. Что здесь происходит на самом деле? С одной стороны, на программы помощи беднейшим странам выделяются финансовые ресурсы и подчас немаленькие финансовые ресурсы. Но по-честному, и здесь многие тоже это знают, зачастую под освоение компаниями самих же стран доноров. Но в то же время, с другой стороны, в развитых странах сохраняются субсидии в сельском хозяйстве, ограничивается для других доступ к высоким технологиям. И давайте называть вещи своими именами. Получается, что одной рукой раздается благотворительная помощь, а другой не только консервируется экономическая отсталость, а еще и собирается прибыль. Возникающее социальное напряжение в таких депрессивных регионах неизбежно выливаются в рост радикализма, экстремизма, подпитывая терроризм и локальные конфликты. А если все это вдобавок происходит, скажем, на Ближнем Востоке, в условиях обостренного восприятия внешнего мира как несправедливого, то возникает риск для глобальной дестабилизации. Очевидно, что ведущие страны мира должны видеть эту угрозу и, соответственно, выстраивать более демократическую, справедливую систему экономических отношений в мире. Систему, дающую всем шанс и возможность для развития. Выступая на конференции по безопасности, уважаемые дамы и господа, нельзя обойти молчанием и деятельность организации по безопасности и сотрудничеству в Европе. Как известно, она была создана, чтобы рассматривать все, я подчеркну это, все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскрыли и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами учредителей. Скроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций, формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСВ призваны оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы ее поддерживаем, но вовсе это не означает вмешательства во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и, наоборот, делает их зависимыми и, как следствие, нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия и транспарентности. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку. Вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. И, конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнерами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех. Благодарю вас за внимание.
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 9:13 PM

@MediaBusters6 - BoehlertMediaBusters

GOP Cowards running & hiding See 1-Sen. Roger Marshall (MAGA-KS) who shut down his Town Hall & fled 2-Sen. Roger Wicker (MAGA-MS) who deleted this tweet & now in hiding after Trump’s horrendous actions 3-Sen. Jerry Moran (MAGA-KS) who posted this but now unavailable for comment https://t.co/Qlo1kIClee

Saved - August 21, 2025 at 12:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the complex relationship between Putin and Jewish influence in global politics. I trace Putin's rise from the collapse of the Soviet Union and the perceived exploitation by Jewish oligarchs under Yeltsin, leading to Putin's crackdown on them. I argue that Western media and politicians, often linked to Jewish interests, have portrayed Putin as a dictator while ignoring his efforts to protect Russian sovereignty. I suggest that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the portrayal of Putin are influenced by these dynamics, advocating for a leader like him to counter perceived external control.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why do the jews hate Putin? Why does the mass media spend so Much time trying to rile up the masses to go to war with him? Why does Mark Levin, Brian Krassentein, and Ben Shapiro do everything they can to tell us opposing Putin is in “our interest.” I’ll tell you why. 🧵 1/18 https://t.co/DWNNXAhn73

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

First we must go back and see the roots of what led to Putins rise to power. Remember that the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. The process of “liberalization” and turning Russias communist economy into a capitalist economy was left up to the planted Jewish puppet, Boris Yeltsin. As you can see he was president from 1991-1999. 🧵 2/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Here is one Jewish puppet besides another… (Yeltsin/ Clinton) and you can see how they were working together for the “new world order of the west. -discussions of economic prosperity for Russia -American investment -Nuclear arms deals -Expansion of NATO.. Many may not remember, but when Bill Clinton was not sleeping with Mossad spy Monica Lewinsky, he was very much serving Jewish foreign policy with his overrepresented Jewish leadership in that area… (Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, William Cohen, Victoria Nuland, etc) 🧵 3/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Our position is that we're going to have an operation that works." "We want Russia to be involved in it." "We made some progress today consistent with both of our objectives with neither side giving up the things that were most important to it." "We made some progress today on that, and we recognized that some of the things that needed to be decided, neither of us could in good conscience decide without giving our military leaders the chance to work through that." "So we agreed that this week this week, our military leaders would be keep working." "That is all I can tell you." "The more we say about it, the worse it'll be." "We are moving toward peace." "The first and most important thing is make peace in Bosnia." "That has not been done yet." "There is no relationship between two"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our position is that we're going to have an operation that works. We want Russia to be involved in it. We made some progress today consistent with both of our objectives with neither side giving up the things that were most important to it. We made some progress today on that, and we recognized that some of the things that needed to be decided, neither of us could in good conscience decide without giving our military leaders the chance to work through that. So we agreed that this week this week, our military leaders would be keep working. That is all I can tell you. The more we say about it, the worse it'll be. We are moving toward peace. The first and most important thing is make peace in Bosnia. That has not been done yet. There is no relationship between two
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines three outcomes: (1) there will be a NATO-Russia agreement that all the leaders will support; although they disagree on expansion, they agree that there must be a partnership between NATO and Russia going forward into the future. (2) the notion that Russia should play a larger role in international economic institutions, and that if certain internal changes are made, which president Yeltsin has already announced his support for, then The United States will make a more vigorous effort to facilitate investment in Russia. (3) they resolved a number of roadblocks relating to START II and other related issues which permitted us to say that president Yeltsin would seek a prompt ratification of START II and we would together support guidelines for START III, which we would hope could be negotiated quickly after that, which would reduce the Cold War arsenals by, over 80% from their Cold War height to more or less 80%. These are dramatic and very substantial results. Speaker 1: Just a moment. you've touched on a very current issue which has to be clarified all the way. well, you understand, of course, why is it that the state DOMA has not yet ratified START two?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Different. One, the idea that there will be a NATO Russia agreement that all the leaders will support. That's a significant thing. We agree to disagree about the question of expansion, but we agree that there must be a partnership between NATO and Russia going forward into the future. Two, the the notion that that Russia should play a larger role in international economic institutions. And that if certain internal changes are made, which president Yeltsin has already announced his support for, then The United States will make a more vigorous effort to facilitate investment in Russia. And third, and I think almost unexpected even among us, we were working along here hoping this would happen. We resolved a number of roadblocks relating to start two and other related issues which permitted us to say that president Yeltsin would seek a prompt ratification of start two and we would together support guidelines for START three, which we would hope could be, negotiated quickly after that, which would reduce the Cold War arsenals by, over 80% from their Cold War height to more or less 80%. These are dramatic and very substantial results, and I'm very pleased with them. Wolf? Speaker 1: Just a moment. I'd like to continue for a second longer. You've touched on a very current issue which has to be clarified all the way. Well, you understand, of course, why is it that the state DOMA has not yet ratified START two?
Video Transcript AI Summary
“I I commend president Yeltsin for his commitment to continuing the path of economic reform.” He notes that in 1993 versus 1992 “the deficit was reduced as a percentage of annual income,” “inflation was brought down,” and “the stabilization of the currency was improved.” He supports further integrating the Russian economy into a global market system, acknowledges dislocations, and urges assistance so the Russian people know there is effort to address these problems. He predicts benefits will flow in the coming year as trade and investment expand and stresses the need for a social safety net and retraining. He says the people of Russia have to define their own future and rejects the idea that the US directs policy, declaring that as long as we share “the same values and the same vision” he wants to be “an equal partner” because “the world, the whole world and particularly Europe has a real interest in seeing Russia succeed and seeing this reform movement succeed.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I commend president Yeltsin for his commitment to continuing the path of economic reform. If you look at 1993 as compared with 1992, If you look at how much the deficit was reduced as a percentage of annual income, if you look at how much inflation was brought down, if you look at how much the stabilization of the currency was improved. I think that the continued work toward hooking the Russian economy into a global economic system based on markets is a very sound thing. The we had great long talks about what could be done and what kind of assistance The United States and others could provide to recognize that there are certain dislocations which come from these changes so that the the people of Russia will know that there is an effort being made to deal with those problems. But I also have to tell you that I believe that that the people will begin to benefit in ways that they could not see perhaps last year in the coming year when we have more trade and more investment. And as people around the world and and in The United States in particular see that the president is serious about this, I think the benefits will begin to flow. That plus constructing the kind of social support system and job retraining, unemployment, all those things that just have to be put together and are not easy to put together when you don't have one. I think these things will help a lot. The other point I'd like to make to you sir, is that from my point of view, President Yeltsin has been unfairly criticized in some quarters for his relationship with The United States. The implication that somehow we have tried to direct the course of Russian policy or it is just not accurate and not true. The people of Russia have to define their own future. All I have tried to do is to say that as long as we share the same values and the same vision, as long as we share a dream of of political freedom and economic freedom and respect for our neighbors, I want to be an equal partner because I believe this is a very great nation and that the world, the whole world and particularly Europe has a real interest in seeing Russia succeed and seeing this reform movement succeed. So I think our relationships in that sense have been quite correct all along and some have sought to miss, characterize them in a way that I think is not accurate.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Presidents, one near the end of his term, the other being Putin seemed indifferent to the American president, who had championed Yeltsin and liberalization and expanded NATO. Putin conveys a huge amount through body language. He tries to show you that he's the alpha male in the room through the way he spreads his legs, through the way he slouches a bit in his chair. And this is not what Clinton was used to when it came to Russia. He was used to having somebody he could relate to, and Putin is a cold fish. And Clinton didn't respond well to him. If mister Clinton was hoping for a foreign policy triumph, he won't get it here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Presidents, one near the end of his term, the other being Putin seemed indifferent to the American president, who had championed Yeltsin and liberalization and expanded NATO. Speaker 1: Putin conveys a huge amount through body language. He tries to show you that he's the alpha male in the room through the way he spreads his legs, through the way he slouches a bit in his chair. Speaker 2: And this is not what Clinton was used to when it came to Russia. He was used to having somebody he could relate to, and Putin is a cold fish. And Clinton didn't respond well to him. If mister Clinton was hoping for a foreign policy triumph, he won't get it here. Speaker 0: Later that day, Clinton received a warmer reception from Boris Yeltsin Yeltsin and issued a warning about Putin. Speaker 3: Bill Clinton looked hard into Yeltsin's eyes and said, I'm a little bit concerned about this young man that you have turned over the presidency to. He doesn't have democracy in his heart. And I will never forget the fa the expression that came over Yeltsin. Speaker 0: Yeltsin's confidants say by the end of his life, he would come to agree with Clinton. Speaker 3: Before Boris Yeltsin died, he told intimates that it was a great mistake for him to have selected Putin as his successor.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Well what’s the problem? Didn’t the Russian people love NATO expansion, economic liberalism, and de-nuclearization? As usual, the United States “sells liberalism” but what they mean is economic exploiting by Jewish capitalist. And Russia was no different. It didn’t take long for the “Semibankirschina” (7 bankers) to own a majority of the assets, and they exploited the Russian people accordingly. And yes most of them were Jews. 🧵 4/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

This led into the Russian financial crisis, and ultimately paved the way for a more nationalistic leader to come in. The people were aware of who their exploiters were. They also saw how chummy Yeltsin was with these Jewish oligarchs. Yeltsin was nervous he would be killed during the political unrest, so he needed a strong leader to take over for him, that would also agree to “pardon him.” That politically savvy, and strong leader, was Vladimir Putin. 🧵 5/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

One of the first things Putin did as president was meet with 20 or so of the rich men in Russia. (The predominantly Jewish oligarchs.) He told them flat out, the days of exploitation are done. They could still be rich, but they would have to stay out of his way, and the people would be served first. 🧵 6/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Now, these Jewish billionaires did not take to that too kindly, but they shortly found out that Putin was not someone they could simply buy with money, or blackmail with Jeffrey Epstein schemes. Putin started dismantling these Jewish oligarchs from power one by one… -Vladimir Gusinsky -Jew ✡️ -Mikhail Khordorkovsky- Jew ✡️ -Boris Berezovsky- Jew ✡️ -Mikhail Prokhorov- Jew ✡️ This isn’t to say, he randomly singled out Jewish oligarchs. There are still Russian Jewish oligarchs today, but they respect the power that Putin holds. He only went after the ones that were undermining him and Russia, and in doing so he was able to return some assets to the state, and take control of some Of the media companies. 🧵 7/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Now some of you are thinking, well those are dictatorial actions. And “he should allow those oligarchs to exploit the people since you know that’s what democracy works.” But you still believe that democracy is “rule of the people.” It is not. Our modern day democracies are rule by media bosses with a mixture of lobbyist during the political process. (Rule of money rather) As such, the interest of a nation are ground down, and the nation is ran by “oligarchs” or in the case of the United States we call them Jewish billionaires. In 2007, Putin lays out his criticisms of NGO’s, the U.S. abuse of power and continued military intervention, the need to refrain from “nato expansion”, and called for a multipolar world. Effectively, after turning Russia around, he told the Jewish led west, he was not going to be pushed around. He also opposed their Talmudic new world order goal, and he has been correct about the detrimental effects of foreign intervention that the U.S. continues to engage in at the behest of the jews… From then on, our Jewish media bosses, state department, and war lords, had it out for Putin.. and they have been trying to overthrow him ever since. 🧵 8/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Спикер подчёркивает, что безопасность охватывает военно-политические, экономические и гуманитарные аспекты, и баланс явно нарушен. Он говорит: "ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран", и что "вскрыли бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ" и "формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных" НПО. По его словам, "гуманитарная сфера ОБСР призвана оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека", но "это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться." Такое вмешательство, по его мнению, "не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и наоборот делает их зависимыми и как следствие нестабильными." Он призывает ОБСЕ действовать по задачам и строить отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения и доверия. Россия, с тысячелетней историей, сохраняет независимую внешнюю политику и хочет сотрудничать с ответственными партнерами ради справедливого мироустройства для всех. Speaker notes: English translation of the Russian summary: Speaker emphasizes that security encompasses military-political, economic, and humanitarian aspects, and the balance is clearly broken. He states: "OSCE is trying to turn into a vulgar instrument of pursuing external political interests of one or a group of countries against others," and notes that "the bureaucratic apparatus of the OSCE has been exposed" and that "formally independent, but purposefully financed, and thus controlled" NGOs exist. According to him, "the humanitarian sphere of the OSCE is to assist member states at their request in upholding international norms in the field of human rights," but "this does not mean interference in internal affairs of other countries, and certainly not forcing these states how they should live and develop." Such interference, in his view, "does not contribute to the maturation of genuine democratic states and, on the contrary, makes them dependent and, as a consequence, unstable." He calls on the OSCE to act according to its tasks and to build relations with sovereign states on the basis of respect and trust. Russia, with a thousand-year history, maintains an independent foreign policy and wants to cooperate with responsible partners for a just world order for all, not for the chosen ones.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Я подчеркну это все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскрыли и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами и учредителями. Вскроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций. Формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСР призвана оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы ее поддерживаем. Но вовсе это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и наоборот делает их зависимыми и как следствие нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем, мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. Конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнерами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2008, Jewish puppets John McCain (funded by the bronfman family) and Barrack Obama both have the same foreign policy and talking points when it comes to dealing with Putin. He’s a dictator, and the “west” needs to stand up to him… Meanwhile they slyly discuss how more Eastern European nations need to come under NATO (world Jewish control.) A no go for a nationalist like Putin. 🧵 9/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues Russia is a nation fueled by petrodollars and a KGB apparatchik run government, saying, "I looked into mister Putin's eyes, and I saw three letters, a k, a g, and a b." He calls Georgia's aggression unacceptable and links it to energy, noting "a pipeline that runs from the Caspian through Georgia through Turkey" and that "the Russians control other sources of energy into Europe." He cites solidarity from Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine in Tbilisi, and warns Russia aims to revive the "old Russian empire." The United States will "support the inclusion of Georgia and Ukraine" into NATO, while Russia is "in violation of their ceasefire agreement" and has stationed troops in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. He recalls a Georgian poster "Vladimir Putin, our president" and says "watch Ukraine" as Crimea and Sevastopol are cited; "we are their friend and ally." Senator McCain and I agree.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Russia has now become a nation fueled by petrodollars that is basically a KGB apparatchik run government. I looked into mister Putin's eyes, and I saw three letters, a k, a g, and a b. And their aggression in Georgia is not acceptable behavior. I do believe that we need to bolster our friends and allies, and that wasn't just about a a problem between Georgia and Russia. It had everything to do with energy. There's a pipeline that runs from the Caspian through Georgia through Turkey. And, of course, we know that the Russians control other sources of energy into Europe, which they have used from time to time. It's not accidental that the presence of Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine flew to Georgia, flew to Tbilisi, where I have spent significant amount of time with a great young president, Misha Sakashvili. And they showed solidarity with them, but also they are very concerned about the Russian threats to regain their status of the old Russian empire. Now I think the Russians ought to understand that we will support. We, The United States, will support the inclusion of Georgia and Ukraine and and the the natural process inclusion into NATO. We also want to make it very clear that the Russians are in violation of their ceasefire agreement. They have stationed additional troops in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. By the way, I went there once, and we went inside and drove in, and there was a huge poster. And this is this is Georgian territory, and there was a huge picture of Vladimir Putin, and it said, Vladimir Putin, our president. It was very clear, the Russian intentions towards Georgia. They were just waiting to seize the opportunity. So this is a very difficult situation. We wanna work with the Russians, but we also have every right to expect the Russians to behave in a fashion in keeping with a with a with a country who respects international boundaries and the norms of international behavior. And watch Ukraine. This whole thing is a got a lot to do with Ukraine, Crimea, the base of the Russian fleet in Sevastopol, and the breakdown of the political process in Ukraine between Temushchenko and Yushchenko is a very serious problem. So watch Ukraine, and let's make sure that we that the Ukrainians understand that we are their friend and ally. Senator, do you have a major difference with what he just said? No. Actually, think senator McCain and I agree for

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2012, when Hillary Clinton and our state department was lying to our faces about what Assad was doing and why, Putin and Russia were backing Assad. Saying that if Assad fell, Syria could fall into a perpetual civil war, and that they didn’t believe the reports of Assad using “chemical weapons.” Fast forward to now where Syria is a mess and the only country that benefited from Assads fall was Israel. Now it’s easy to see why the jews in our government wanted to get rid of Putin. 🧵 10/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. Norway and our other European allies have been strong, consistent voices on behalf of the Syrian people, and I commend them for their advocacy. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. There has been a crescendo of condemnation, not only from the world, but in particular from the region. After the Security Council statement, we've seen movement in rapid succession from the Arab League, the GCC, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and others. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. In particular, we urge those countries still buying Syrian oil and gas, those countries still sending Assad weapons, those countries whose political and economic support give him comfort in his brutality to get on the right side of history. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways. Now it is something that we are
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: In gears to Syria. Our president has said that you're backing an evil guy there. He said Assad is an evil guy. Do you believe that? Speaker 1: what? That Assad is an evil person? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Let's talk objectively. Has Assad made mistakes? Yes, probably. And more than a few. What about the people who oppose him? Are they angels or something? Who is it that's killing people over there? Executing children? Who's cutting off heads? Are these the kind of people we should support? Speaker 0: We all saw the video of the suffering, dying children. Do you deny? Because Assad denies that those tapes are real. Do you believe those tapes are fake? Speaker 1: That's false information. As of now, we're absolutely convinced that this was a provocation. Assad did not use those weapons, and all of this was done by people who then wanted to blame him. Speaker 0: The bodies of the victims were autopsy. The autopsies were witnessed by officials from the World Health Organization and from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and they concluded that the victims were attacked with sarin gas. Are are we really to believe that the whole thing was staged, that everybody was in on it? Speaker 1: The answer is very simple, and you know it. It could have been used by someone, but not Assad.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In gears to Syria. Our president has said that you're backing an evil guy there. He said Assad is an evil guy. Do you believe that? In Speaker 1: what? That Assad is an evil person? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Let's talk objectively. Has Assad made mistakes? Yes, probably. And more than a few. What about the people who oppose him? Are they angels or something? Who is it that's killing people over there? Executing children? Who's cutting off heads? Are these the kind of people we should support? Speaker 0: We all saw the video of the suffering, dying children. Do you deny? Because Assad denies that those tapes are real. Do you believe those tapes are fake? Speaker 1: That's false information. As of now, we're absolutely convinced that this was a provocation. Assad did not use those weapons, and all of this was done by people who then wanted to blame him. Speaker 0: The bodies of the victims were autopsy. The autopsies were witnessed by officials from the World Health Organization and from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and they concluded that the victims were attacked with sarin gas. Are are we really to believe that the whole thing was staged, that everybody was in on it? Speaker 1: The answer is very simple, and you know it. It could have been used by someone, but not Assad.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2014, the U.S. state department led by jews like Victoria Nuland, staged a coup against the duly elected president Victor Yanukovych. What was Yanukovychs crime? He was too pro Russian, and was not necessarily going to push the boundaries for NATO expansion. So you can see the international jews went to work, with George Soros funding dissidents, the Jewish American media machine saying Yanukovych was not elected properly, and Jewish state department rep Victoria Nuland even handing out cookies to Ukrainian dissidents. This led to Putin invading and annexing the Crimea. 🧵 11/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 1989 revolutions, you funded dissident activities and civil society groups in Eastern Europe, including Poland and the Czech Republic; are you doing similar work in Ukraine? He replies that he set up a foundation in Ukraine before its independence from Russia, and that the foundation has functioned ever since and played an important part in events now. He says Ukraine can assert independence from Russia and move toward the West, though Putin will try to destabilize it; the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent, and with freedom, free media, and a flourishing economy, his regime would be unsustainable. He is asked about antisemitism in Ukraine; he notes antisemitism is part of the DNA of that part of the world, and there is antisemitism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That many people recognized about you was that you, during the revolutions of nineteen eighty nine, funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, The Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of, Russia, and the foundation has been, functioning ever since. And it played an important part in events now. Speaker 0: Do you think Ukraine will be able to assert a kind of independence from Russia, and an alignment, with the West? Not not a specific alignment as a NATO, but a kind of orientation toward the West, or will the Russians always stop them? Speaker 1: No. Putin will try to destabilize, Ukraine, but the Ukrainians, the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent of of Russia. It won't be easy because Putin, has, staked his regime on destabilizing Ukraine because it's a threat to to his regime in Russia. If you have freedom, free media, and so on, and a flourishing economy, that would, make his regime, unsustainable. Speaker 0: He accuses the Ukrainians of being antisemitic, of them being full of antisemitic fascists. You operate in Ukraine. You're of Jewish origin. Have you detected virulent antisemitism in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Well, antisemitism is part of the DNA of that part of the world. So there is antisemit

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Remember the “Russian Collusion hoax” of 2017? Did you know that research was funded by a Jew named Paul Singer?? 🧐 Obviously Trump was acquitted, but the intended effect was missed by many. It was to be associated with Russia, is a crime. Remember that Trump ran on “warming relations” With the Russians. Well that was pretty much iced by this fake scandal, and so it worked. 🧵 12/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Then we have the 2nd impeachment hoax. Also involving Ukraine/Russia, but what was the crux of the matter? That Trump was going to withhold weapons from Ukraine…. A no no for our Jewish oligarchs. Thus this scandal provided the same effect yet again. Trump affirms his support of Ukraine, and distances himself from Russia, and everyone is afraid to tell the truth about Russia, or they will be labeled a “foreign agent” because Ukraine is our potential NATO ally. Well it’s not our ally. It’s manufactured state created by NATO and currently ran by a coke head Jew Zelensky …. Did you also know that the guy that “leaked” scandalous phone call for Trumps 2nd impeachment was also Jewish? What are the odds…. 🧵 13/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Never forget how Zelensky came to power in Ukraine and who funded his rise… Before he was killed in Ukraine, American journalist Gonzalo Lira laid out exactly how Zelensky was manufactured and funded by Israeli Jewish billionaire Kolomoisky. And that same billionaire Kolomoisky, was the Jew who had a controlling interest in Burisma… the gas company that was paying Hunter Biden 50k a month. Oh a tangled web the Jews weave to blackmail/ buy influence… 🧵 14/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky is 'the cokehead of Kyiv' and 'a manufactured political figure' created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoyski, owner of OnePlusOne Media, which financed and produced 'Servant of the People.' 'Servant of the People' hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, to play the role of the President. Kolomoyski created a party called 'Servant of the People' and financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire; 'he's the finger puppet of Kolomsky.' Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden to the tune of $50,000 a month on Burisma's Board of Directors in 2014. 'Hunter Biden' and Zelensky are 'spiritual cousins' bankrolled by the same guy. The laptop mentions a 10% kickback to 'the old man.' The White House is freaking out over Ukraine; Westerners exploited Ukraine; Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see, Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, well, the cokehead of Kyiv, because he is a cokehead, the cokehead of Kyiv is actually a manufactured political figure. He was manufactured by a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch called Igor Kolomoyski. Igor Kolomoyski was the man who owns OnePlusOne Media here in Ukraine, And OnePlusOne Media is the company that financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People. Servant of the People hired Zelenskyy, a well known actor in Ukraine, an actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, well, they hired him to play the role of the President in this show Servant of the People. Servant of the People had huge ratings, but a lot of people say that it was really weird the amount of propaganda and PR that was done for the show. It was disproportionate to any other show of any channel. The amount of PR positive press and all the rest of it, it was really pushed on the people. Some people say it was completely astroturf. Some people who know how to speak Ukrainian and who have watched the show have told me that it's a mildly enjoyable show, but no big deal. But anyway, the show was hugely popular, and it ran from 2015 to 2018, and almost seamlessly. Kolomoisky, the oligarch, created a party called Servant of the People, same name as the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky, a man with no previous political experience and indeed no previous political interest. Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. How many actors do you know are billionaires? I don't think that Tom Cruise is a billionaire and he's the most successful actor in the world, if he's just an actor. Zelensky is more than just an actor. He's the finger puppet of Kolomoisky, this oligarch. And do you know who Kolomoisky also financed, to the tune of $50,000 a month, plus additional benefits of different sorts? Hunter Biden. Yes, in 2014, Burisma, the Ukrainian oil company gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors to the tune of $50,000 a month. Who do you think controls Burisma? Kolomovsky, the same guy who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. Yeah, I bet you didn't know that. Zelensky and Hunter Biden are spiritual cousins. They are bankrolled by the same guy. It's funny because both of them have drug addictions, pretty serious ones, both of them get their money from Kolomovsky, and both of them are intimately involved in Ukraine. But here's the difference, of course: Zelenskyy doesn't have a dad who's President of The United States, now does he? Why do you think the White House is freaking out so badly over Ukraine? In Ukraine, there are all kinds of secrets. In Ukraine, well, see, the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. They have financially raped Ukraine, stripping it of monies and assets, monies and assets needed by the people of Ukraine. This is part of the reason that Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe, if not the poorest country in Europe, of the corruption, because of how Westerners have exploited it, Western politicians have exploited it. Hunter Biden? $50,000 a month. And you say to yourself, well, thousand isn't that much. Yeah, but $50,000 a year is the median household income in The United States. In Ukraine, a much poorer country, $50,000 a year, easily solve the problems of a good four or five families in Ukraine, the financial problems of those four or five families in Ukraine, for a year. And Hunter Biden was getting that money per month, just for himself. Although, of course, in the Hunter Biden emails there's talk that seems to be true that the old man would get a 10% kickback of whatever Hunter Biden was getting. That was in the laptop. Oh yeah. Look it up. You don't have to take my word for it. You don't have to take my word for any of what I'm telling you. Look it up yourself and you'll find it. It's very easy to find. Kolomovsky, the Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch, was financing Zelensky, was financing Joe Biden. God alone knows who else he was financing, and he was just one. There's a whole rotten bunch of these people here in Ukraine, and they were all busy paying off the West so that they could carry on their little evil deeds and whatnot. If you want to know why the West is freaking out over Ukraine, you have to understand that they are all terrified that the truth will come out in Ukraine.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

After the Jews had their Zelensky puppet installed, and they their Jewish Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, they finally pushed Putin to the breaking point. He then invaded Ukraine in 2022. And the lying Jewish controlled mass media tells us, “Putin is crazy” and he is slaughtering Slavs. But he’s not. He’s been very strategic in trying to limit loss of life. And our lying media leaves out the fact that this was a totally Jewish provoked war, for NATO power expansion. They also always leave out the fact that the jews and the U.S. state department (one and the same) overthrew the Ukrainian regime in 2014…. 🧵 15/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

And if Putin is such an oppressive awful leader, like our Jewish media tells us, why then is Russia still allowed to be Russian? Putin has outlawed Gay Marriage, Transgender madness, and no one is going to jail for being proud to be a “White Russian.” In other words, Putin has shielded his people from the pernicious Jewish influence that is destroying the west right now. Under Putin, the Russian economy has done quite well from where it was in 1999. Also the debt situation and natural resource situation in Russia is great. Further the Russian Orthodox Church has done exceptionally well under Putins leadership. Meanwhile many brainwashed Christians in the west are serving Jews for the expansion of Israel while our nation fails. Putin even allowed for Edward Snowden to seek Asylum in Russia and has protected him against our blood thirsty government and its Jewish controllers… 🧵 16/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Is Putin an out an out antisemite? No. He is not. He even has Jewish friends and the like, but clearly he is a nationalist, and he is opposed to the Jewish new world order. While he may not name them explicitly, he names them implicitly…. Like in these 2 clips where he describes the “American media propaganda machine” the “bankers”, and who really blew up Nordstream… 🧵 17/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But but here's a question you may be able to answer. You worked in Germany, famously. The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? Speaker 1: This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

So the jews and the west will continue do what they can to “pray for Putins death” as Krassenstein says below. But America should see through the propaganda. We need a leader very much like Putin if we are to ever overcome our Jewish overlords. If not, we will continue to see non white immigration, transgender lunacy, and wars in the Middle East (and Ukraine) for Israel… If you enjoyed this thread, Consider subscribing to the page! 🧵 18/18

Saved - October 22, 2025 at 3:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim the Rothschilds want war because they never forgave Putin for this. Yukos, which produced 20% of Russia’s gas, was secretly under British-based Zionist globalist Jacob Rothschild, who also controlled the British Royal Family. Putin then returned the gas in Rothschild's control to the Russian state and people. The Rothschilds were furious and began planning war against Russia.

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

I DO NOT STAND WITH THE ROTHSCHILDS: THEY WANT WAR BECAUSE THEY NEVER FORGAVE PUTIN FOR THIS! And now they want your children to die for their greed! Did you know that Yukos, the oil company that produced 20% of Russia’s gas, was secretly under the control of British based Zionist globalist Jacob Rothschild, who also controlled the British Royal Family? Putin then returned to the Russian state and the Russian people the gas in Rothschild's control. The Rothschilds were furious and started planning the war against Russia.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that there is a protector in a trust who performs the role of overseeing what happens and must be completely independent and trusted because this person has only one function. The protector’s job is to open a sealed envelope and transfer the control package to another person named in that package whenever the person who holds the control is acting under pressure. The package contains the identity of the next person who will take over control. The speaker notes that the second person in the chain was Nevzlin, but this was never discussed openly because it was essential that no one knew who the second, third, fourth, or fifth person were. The protector’s function is not about ensuring someone is killed; rather, it is about situations such as if someone in possession of the control is being pressured or if someone from their family is taken hostage and the company itself must not be put at risk. In such cases, the protector must detect when the holder is acting under duress and remove their authority by passing the control package to the next designated person. The speaker provides a real-life example: when the speaker was arrested and taken to prison, the protector decided that the speaker could no longer make independent decisions under pressure and passed the control package onward to the next person. When asked to name who the protector was, the speaker confirms that this role was filled by a highly notable figure whose involvement in the company had been the subject of extensive discussion, yet no one truly knew who the protector was. The protector in question was Lord Jeko Procheret, who had recently passed away. In summary, the protector is a trusted, independent figure responsible for detecting duress and transferring control to the next designated individual by opening the sealed envelope and executing the transfer when necessary. The system is designed to ensure the company remains shielded from external pressure or coercion by moving control away from anyone acting under duress. The identity of the protector is kept confidential, and in this account, the protector was identified as Lord Jeko Procheret, the recently deceased figure associated with the company. The narrative also mentions Nevzlin as the second named person in the package, though the specifics of their position or involvement were not openly disclosed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: У нас было принято такое решение, что есть протектор в трасте, то есть это человек, который выполняет функции человека, следящего за тем, что происходит. Он должен быть совершенно независимым и абсолютно доверенным, потому что у него только одна функция. В тот момент, когда он видит, что человек, держащий контрольный пакет в компании, действует не под давлением, скажем так, то он должен вскрыть конверт и передать вот этот вот самый контрольный пакет другому человеку, который вот в этом пакете будет указан. У нас таким вторым человеком был Невзлин, но мы это никогда не обсуждали, потому что нужно было, чтобы никто не знал, кто второй, кто третий, кто четвертый, кто пятый. Так, а это на случай, если вас убьют? Нет, на случай, когда убьют это проще. Когда, например, возьмут кого-нибудь из семьи в заложники и начнут шантажировать чем-то связанным деятельностью компании. Поскольку компанию нельзя ставить в этом случае под удар, протектор должен увидеть, что я действую под давлением, и забрать у меня полномочия. И так произошло, когда меня взяли в тюрьму. То есть меня взяли в тюрьму, протектор принял решение, что оттуда я могу принимать решение под давлением, и передал пакет следующему. Вы можете назвать, кто был протектором? Да, конечно. Это как раз очень характерная фигура, роль которой в компании все всячески обсуждали, и никто не знал на самом деле. Недавно умерший лорд Джеко Прочерт. Вот он выполнял функцию протектора.
Saved - January 26, 2026 at 6:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I critique the Western order as not free, hypocritical and full of lies. The U.S. alone used nuclear weapons in WWII (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) and, with Britain, bombed Dresden, Hamburg, and Cologne to intimidate the Soviet Union. Vietnam’s napalm and other tactics are remembered, as are Korea and spying. Leaders tolerate all this, branded as transatlantic solidarity.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

‼️‼️‼️⚡️🚨Putin Says The Western World's Order is not FREE. ‼️It is, HYPOCRITICAL and FULL of LIES. ‼️U.S. Was Only Nation to Use Nuclear Weapons in WW2 The U. S. Is the only nation in the world that used nuclear weapons twice destroying the towns of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let me remind you that together with the U. K. The U. S. World War two annihilate Dresden, hamburg and cologne and that there was no rationale behind that. There was no need to destroy. With air bombardment these great cities, they wanted to do that to intimidate the soviet union. That was their only goal. They left the west left a horrible history in Vietnam where they used napalm and other horrible tactics. Remember the Republic of Korea and their actions there, they keep are, there are various devices used to listen to them and spy on them. And the leaders of these countries tolerate all that and all of that is branded as transatlantic solidarity.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a critical view of Western nations, arguing that for ages they claim to bring democracy and freedom to the world, but in reality they enslave and destroy. The Western world order, she says, is not free; it is hypocritical and full of lies. She asserts that the US is the only nation in the world that used nuclear weapons twice, destroying the towns of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. She reminds that together with the UK, the US, during World War II, annihilated Dresden, Hamburg, and Cologne, and that there was no rationale behind that; there was no need to destroy these great cities with air bombardment, and their purpose was to intimidate the Soviet Union. She notes a history of the West leaving a horrible trace in Vietnam where napalm and other horrific tactics were used. She references the Republic of Korea and their actions there, questioning what kind of allies the West has, noting that many of the leaders of those countries perceived as allies are followed and subjected to various devices used to listen to them and spy on them. The leaders tolerate all that, and all of that is branded as transatlantic solidarity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Western nations for ages have been saying that they bring democracy and freedom to the world, but it's entirely the opposite. Instead of democracy, they enslave. Instead of freedom, they destroy. The Western world order is not free. It is hypocritical and full of lies. The US is the only nation in the world that used nuclear weapons twice destroying the towns of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let me remind you that together with the with The UK, The US, during World War two, annihilated Dresden, Hamburg, and Cologne, and that there was no rationale behind that. There was no need to destroy with air bombardment these great cities. They wanted to do that to intimidate the Soviet Union. That was their only goal. They left the West left a horrible, history in Vietnam where they used napalm and other horrible tactics. Remember the Republic Of Korea and their actions there. They keep calling South Korea their own allies. What kind of allies are these? We know that many of the leaders of those countries that are perceived as allies of the West are being followed and, they are there are various devices used to listen to them and spy on them. And the leaders of these countries tolerate all that. And all of that is branded as transatlantic solidarity.
Saved - April 24, 2026 at 12:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see daily on European TV a curated story of victory and unity, while Ukraine’s cities lie in ruin and its people pay the price. Hundreds of thousands are dead or maimed; the economy and shelves falter, winters loom with blackouts. Europeans call it solidarity, yet approve a frozen conflict with no plan or real willingness to pay the price. This isn’t neutrality; it’s danger. I’m not asking for surrender, but honesty about costs and leaders who tell the truth.

@IuliiaMendel - Iuliia Mendel

What you see every day on European television is a carefully edited story: Ukraine is “winning,” the West is “united,” and everything is under control. I wish that were true. The reality inside my country is very different. Entire cities and towns have been reduced to rubble. Hundreds of thousands of young Ukrainian men have been killed or maimed. Families are exhausted, the economy is in ruins, and the next winter can again come with blackouts and empty shelves. People are not “resilient heroes” in some Hollywood script — they are simply desperate. Many no longer believe the war will end on the terms we were promised two years ago. And yet, when you listen to Brussels or read the big European newspapers, you hear only applause for the status quo. More sanctions. More weapons. More “strategic patience.” They call it solidarity. One has to ask — with all due respect — is it really solidarity, or is it something more cynical? European leaders talk about “defending democracy” while quietly admitting in private that they have no plan for victory and no real intention of paying the full price themselves. Their media shows endless images of Ukrainian suffering but almost never asks the uncomfortable question: how many more lives must be lost before someone in the EU admits that the current strategy is not working? This is not just hypocritical. It is dangerous. By keeping the conflict frozen in this half-supported, half-abandoned state, we are not only destroying Ukraine — we are exhausting Europe’s own economies, pushing global food and energy prices higher, and steadily raising the risk that one miscalculation turns a regional war into something far wider. The status quo is not neutral. It is a slow-motion catastrophe dressed up as moral virtue. I am not asking for surrender. I am asking for honesty. Europeans deserve to know the real price being paid. Ukrainians deserve leaders who tell them the truth instead of yesterday’s slogans. And the world deserves a conversation that is no longer filtered through political correctness.

View Full Interactive Feed