reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here’s “the stuff I didn’t wanted to know about my country.” How Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs stole two elections. 10,000 illegal aliens using the same exact social security number voted on November 3, 2020. https://t.co/FnANTIEb2j
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found 10,000 people using the same Social Security number. They are brought in illegally and given a number to pay taxes. Companies hire them across various plants and factories, all using the same number. The IRS only checks if there's an employer associated with the number, validating it. These individuals then use the number to obtain driver's licenses, leading to voter suppression. The government ignores this issue and these individuals don't pay taxes, as companies deduct them. The government has a $1.7 trillion slush fund, generating $100 million in interest monthly. This information is unsettling, revealing a corrupt system benefiting everyone involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We discovered 10,000 people using the exact Social Security number. See if this one rings true. You take an illegal. You bring them in. They sign a piece of paper promising to pay taxes.
What they get is a Social Security number so the employers can take out the taxes. Put a pin in that. Here's what they do. In cities like this, let's think of A chicken processor. They will bring in hundreds of illegals.
They will spread them out across all of these plants and factories, giving them jobs. They're all using the same Social Security number. The IRS unconnected our names from the Social Security number. Now when you look it up, it just pings to see if there's an employer. If there is, it says it's good.
It validates it. Why do they do that? Because all of these factories are giving them Social Security numbers. The government turns its back on it. As you have a Social Security number and you go over to motor voter, pass the driver's court test, Right?
You get a driver's license. Suppression, look, you got a social. You must be a citizen. That's how they pack the roles. By the way, those guys don't pay taxes anyway.
It's taken out by companies. Our government's been sitting on $1,700,000,000,000 slush fund that that one fund has still in it to this day. So if you wanna know where the dark money comes from by the way, that's what, $100,000,000 in, a month in interest. I could go on. I now understand this is why they tried to kill us, and it's not stuff I wanted to know.
It's not stuff I wanted to know about my country. It's not stuff I believed, But we have a uniparty. We don't have multiple parties. Everybody's benefited from this at one time or another.
@polishprincessh - 👑💥 Serenity 💥👑
On Nov 9 the reported count is 25,000 ballots less which is beyond the margin here than on Nov 10. So the day after the election they put what the count is and then magically 25,000 Bidens appear on Nov 10. https://t.co/tv0hrhifM5
Video Transcript AI Summary
On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And by the way, we have a manifestation which still is unexplained. On November 9th, the reported count is 25,000 ballots less, which is beyond the margin here, than on November 10th. So the day after the election, They don't they put out what the count is, and then magically 25,000 ballots appear on November 10th, and, well, hey, that's the race. It doesn't make sense. This is just flat wrong, what is going on here.
The law is there for a reason. The law is there to protect the integrity of the vote.
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2020 election in Arizona has been a subject of controversy. Claims of stolen ballots, duplicate votes, and manipulated voter rolls have emerged. Allegations include the lack of unique identification numbers on duplicated ballots, a surge of duplicate votes after the polls closed, and the certification of the election without proper chain of custody. Additionally, concerns have been raised about deleted files from the server and the centralized control of voter records. These allegations highlight the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process.
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
Remind me. Exactly how was the 2020 election stolen in Arizona? Throw it all at me. Fact, conspiracy theory, rumors that were ostensibly proven false. I'm looking for something, but I don't know what. Help right now will go a long way.
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
@larrydarp - LA Darpinian
@rob_voreck @AZAGMayes @realAlexKolodin How did the first auditors certify the 2020 election when it had already been deleted off the server by Maricopa County? "I find it frankly laughable to suggest that a county in response to a subpoena could say we will delete files from the hard drive..." https://rumble.com/vucnp3-maricopa-county-election-workers-caught-red-handed-deleting-archived-files-.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=5
Maricopa County Election Workers CAUGHT RED-HANDED Deleting “Archived” Files From Server Before Del
EXCLUSIVE – ELECTION FRAUD ON VIDEO: Maricopa County Election Workers CAUGHT RED-HANDED Deleting “Archived” Files From Server Before Delivery To Auditors This Content Is Mirrored. Please support the o
rumble.com
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
@DecentFiJC - Jonathan
Oh, it appears the Access Voter Information Database (AVID) Project was designed to prepare for and foster the transition of control of voter records and data to becoming a highly centralized model (from a Hybrid Model) — voter records and data would then be controlled by Secretaries of State and capable of being updated in real-time at respective registrar’s offices. How convenient. And it also appears Garrett Archer was running point for all this as the “Project Manager” for the AVID Project. Imagine that.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
So they had direct control over the voter rolls & manipulated them to create ~145,000 imaginary voters, produced extra mail-in ballots for them, completed them & forged the envelopes, had them counted without chain of custody, and also double+ scanned some of them? @DecentFiJC
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
Real paper for the fraudulent mail-in votes, due to the voter roll manipulation & production within the ordinary process; fake paper provided to in-person voters to break machines & send election day votes to adjudication
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
AZ 2020 Counterfeit Ballot Exhibits: Be kind and share? - Maricopa County 2020 Ballot official paper standard - Voter-volunteer ballot hand-examination findings - Maricopa County official response on issue - Further AZ Senate ballot analysis https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/
Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC
Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer.
uncoverdc.com
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
So the election day & subsequent days' contact points are: Delivery of ballots without chain of custody Delivery, loading of bad ballot paper Falsified envelope signature verification Adjudication process Offsite transport, storage & destruction Double-scanning Did I miss any?
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
Each of those steps requires observably criminal actions by a person that is in on it & deliberately committing election fraud. Maybe not so much the ballot paper delivery or loading. That just requires incompetence & sloppiness.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Get your mind blown tonight? Here’s how the Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs stole another election, This is just out of 300K ballots examined, Voter deceased as of Oct 1 800 blank 1800 no signatures And her tabulators rejected a quarter of a million Kari Lakes https://t.co/Y0PvZI9WLQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 2022 election in Arizona, numerous irregularities were found. One example is a ballot envelope of a deceased voter that passed without challenge. Over 800 blank ballots with no signature were also counted, which violates state statutes. Additionally, there were voter registration files with incorrect signatures. The tabulators used in Maricopa County did not meet the required error rate, averaging 235 times higher than the standard. This led to the rejection of over a quarter of a million ballots due to feed errors. These issues highlight the problems in the election process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I want the audience wants their mind blown this morning. Give us 1 or 2 examples that you think are the most egregious.
Speaker 1: Sure. So we processed a dead voter ballot envelope. The man died several days before the election. And on the ballot signature component where they're supposed to sign their name, Somebody wrote on there, voter is deceased as of October 1st, signed his name, and that passed right through without any form of challenge whatsoever. Over 800 blank ballots with no signature at all, which is a secondary statute violation.
Because in the state of Arizona, there's no curing a blank envelope without a signature on election day. That that vote shouldn't count. We found 1800 out of 300,000 analyzed. They have no signature whatsoever, no phone number, no date. We have seen voter registration files with the wrong signatures on them.
It's a disaster. Well, let me tell you how perfect this election was. We also analyzed the slog files, Okay? The slug files are the system log files that tell you every read in those tabulators for the 2022 election. They claim that the EAC is the regulating agency that takes care of those tabulators and decides which ones are used and how they're used.
These tabulators are not to exceed an error rate of 0.002 or 1 in 500 ballots. On election day. Maricopa County used 446 tabulators, not one of them met EAC standard. As a matter of fact, they averaged 235 times the EAC standard, rejecting over a quarter of a 1000000 ballots in ballot feed errors
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is “STATED, CONFIRMED and RECONFIRMED” How Gov Brian Wimp and Rat Raffensperger overturned the results of the 2020 election and co-conspirator Ms. affirmative action covering it all up, Fulton County inserted over 37,300 votes into the 2020 election video #1BL #2TR https://t.co/yhOruPi50A
Video Transcript AI Summary
A grand jury in Fulton County has indicted 19 individuals for breaking Georgia law by conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the state. The prosecutors and investigators involved in the case have worked diligently to gather the necessary information for this indictment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you for joining us. I'm here with the prosecutors and investigators who have worked diligently on the investigation of criminal attempts to interfere in the administration of Georgia's 2020 presidential election. Today, based on information developed By that investigation, a Fulton County grand jury returned a true bill of indictment charging 19 individuals with violations of Georgia law arising from a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in this state.
Video Transcript AI Summary
At a press conference with Garland Favarito, a retired Pepsi Cola executive named Joe Rossi contacted the speaker to inquire about the source of their information. The speaker revealed it came from the secretary of state's office and explained their calculations. Surprisingly, Rossi independently discovered the same information, even identifying additional errors. Rossi then wrote a letter to Governor Kemp, which was reviewed and verified by Kemp's office. This confirmed the accuracy of the speaker's work, as validated by Rossi and subsequently by Governor Kemp's office.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was shown at a press conference with Garland Favarito. It was picked up by Steve Bannon and then, and then shown I think the same night on Tucker Carlson show. And a couple weeks later, maybe a week or so later, I got a telephone call from, mister Joe Rossi of Perry, Georgia, who's a retired, Pepsi Cola, executive. He called me up and he said, where did, where did you, where was the source of your information? And I told it was the secretary of state's office.
How did you do the calculations? I shared that with him. He was going to do his own calculations. To my surprise, Joe Rossi called me back about a week and a half later and he said he found exactly the same thing that I found. He in fact even found a couple more errors.
He then created a letter that he wrote to, to governor Kemp and governor Kemp's office took a look at what Rossi had put together and they verified. So my work was vetted and proven right by Rossi and then Rossi's was proved right by Governor Kemp's office.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fulton County reported 59,000 votes on Election Day, but the speaker believes the actual number is around 22,000, suggesting 37,000 votes were inserted. Evidence from Carter Jones, a consultant for Fulton County, shows that there were 21,843 votes with 655 provisionals. Notably, there is a screenshot from November 5th, a day and a half after the election, showing an incompatible number of open and closed polling places. During a special meeting on election night, an official record noted an inconsistent number of votes. A former employee of the Elections Division mentioned that around 14,000 people had cast ballots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fulton County reported that 59,000 people voted on Election Day. We believe the real number is around 22,000. So that means about 37,000 votes were inserted. Here's how we know. The first thing we'll take a look at is the total number of votes that were certified.
So Fulton County certified 59,143 election day votes. That's coming directly from the source of the secretary of state's office. Alright, so we're back to Carter Jones. Again, Carter Jones is a consultant with 7 Hill Strategies. His job was to help Fulton County figure out what they did right, what they did wrong and what they could improve.
So on page 16 of his 29 page unredacted notes, we can see that Fulton County Had 21,843 votes with 655 provisionals. What's interesting is the red boxes. Look at the date and timestamp. Thursday, November 5th, 12:49 am is a day and a half after the election is over. That's a screenshot right there.
And you can also see that there are 157 poles that are open and only 19 that are closed. So 59,000 ballots cast, but Carter Jones shows 21,000,843. It's really interesting. Fulton County held a special meeting at 6:30 pm on election night where an incompatible number of votes was noted on the official record. Here is where you'll hear Dwight Brower, who's a former employee with the Elections Division, talk about he's saying it has been a fairly eventful election day.
The last of about 5 about 14,000 people have cast ballots.
Speaker 1: Take a listen. Actually, canceled the ballot. And then we had about 598 provisional dollars and then we had about 598 provisional dollars cash.
Speaker 0: So as of 5 p. M, the 14,152 vote number, It sounds kind of low. Question from my colleague. Where it's confirmed by doctor Routh. Take a look.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, there is a discussion about the number of votes cast in the election. It is mentioned that 14,150 ballots were cast on November 3rd, with an additional 598 provisional ballots. However, there seems to be a discrepancy between this number and the reported 59,000 people who voted on election day in Fulton County. The speakers question the math and suggest that it doesn't make sense for 45,000 people to have voted in the last two hours.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a
Speaker 1: reconfirm where it's confirmed by doctor Ruth. Take a look.
Speaker 2: Or mister Brower. Please go ahead. Doctor Ruth. Either Yes. Mister Brower, can you give us that number again, the 14,000 number?
Yes. Mister Brewer, can you give us number again of 14,000
Speaker 0: number? 14,150.
Speaker 2: Cast ballots, about 14,000
Speaker 0: On the November 3rd, January election. And 598 people have actually, submitted or cast a provisional ballot.
Speaker 2: People have actually, submitted or cast a provisional ballot.
Speaker 1: Alright. So the number 1,400,152 was stated and confirmed. Let me let me hear it's gonna be reconfirmed.
Speaker 3: Mister Brown. Let me let me make sure we entered. What you're saying is Troy Anderson Up until about this time, we've only had 14,000 votes cast on We've only I'm missing
Speaker 4: the point votes cast Oh,
Speaker 3: it was, it's kinda annoying here. Not coming through clear on my side, I don't think. Not coming through clear
Speaker 0: on my side. Of 5 PM This evening as of November 3rd, we've had 14,000 November 152 14,000 ballots cast in person ballots cast are on election day. 598 provisional ballots cast. 98
Speaker 1: provisional balance. So how do you like that? Stated, confirmed, reconfirmed. So the math just doesn't add up. If Fulton County said or reported 59,000 people voted on election day, But Ralph Jones and Dwight Brower confirmed 3 times that only 14,000 people have voted as of 5 PM.
That means that about 45,000 people rushed to the polls in the last 2 hours of voting. Does that make any sense if you're from Georgia? No, it doesn't. You just heard Raffensperger in his video a couple moments ago say
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is the Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs to Maricopa County, this is how many ballots I need from you. 30% of duplicates came in between Nov. 4 - Nov. 9th of 2020, https://t.co/GLwgsgZ4VH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Further analysis of the duplicates and the EVVs revealed an interesting trend. The graph shows the duplicates in relation to the daily percentage of EVVs. There was a sudden significant increase in the percentage of duplicates on certain days, with 96% of the ballots being duplicates on two of those days. The area under the curve represents around 25-30% of the duplicates, which were received between November 4th and November 9th. This led us to remove the blanks and scribbles from the plot, and the same phenomenon was observed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As we did further analysis on the blanks I mean, sorry, the duplicates and the EDVRE. And this is what's interesting. So what we're plotting here is the duplicates as a function of the daily percentage of EVVs. So here's the signal. But what you see is you see suddenly this what you may call a significant growth in percentage.
In fact, in Several of these days, there's 96% of the ballots that came in on 2 of these days are, are duplicates. So there was a serious number of duplicates. In fact, the area under this curve is close to 30%, 25 to 30% of the duplicates came in between, November 4th to to November 9th. And that motivated us to also on the same plot Drop the blanks and the scribbles, and you see the same phenomenon there.
@TaraBull808 - TaraBull𝕏
Fulton County found 20,713 votes from phantom tabulators that didn't even exist in the 2020 election, according to a public record request. Trump “lost” Georgia by 11,779 votes. Someone help me out with the math, because this sh*t isn't adding up. https://t.co/YGLPBR2PFo
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is the Arizona audit of the Nov 3, 2020 Insurrection 74, 243 ballots returned and counted in the 2020 Insurrection with NO RECORD of ever being Sent Out. Note: Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, https://t.co/QRuAgseJNy
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona without a clear record of being sent. In Arizona, there are supposed to be records (EB32s and EB33s) of when a mail-in ballot is sent and received. The number of EB32s should be higher than the number of EB33s. However, in this case, there are more ballots received than there are records of being sent. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but it is unclear if they were actually sent to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 7,000 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's there's, EB 32s and EB 33s. EB32 is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent, and an EB33 is supposed to give a record of when, the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EB32s more sent out than there are that are received. Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to.
And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is Nov 3, 2020 the most secure Insurrection in US history, 42,000 voted more than once 1,500 dead people 19,000 non residents 8,000 from non existent addresses 15,000 commercial or vacant addresses, 4000 non citizens “Our evidence has never been refuted only ignored.” https://t.co/gDpTV3TzdZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Due to AB 4, mail-in ballots surged from 70,000 in 2016 to over 690,000 this year. Despite facing accusations of fraud, our team diligently investigated every lead. Our experts discovered that over 42,000 individuals voted multiple times by comparing voter lists and identifying matches in names, addresses, and dates of birth. Additionally, approximately 1,500 deceased individuals were recorded as voting by cross-referencing male voters with social security death records. Moreover, over 19,000 people voted despite not residing in Nevada, excluding military and student voters. Our analysis also revealed around 8,000 votes from non-existent addresses and over 15,000 votes from commercial or vacant addresses. Astonishingly, nearly 4,000 non-citizens voted, as confirmed by comparing DMV records with the list of actual voters in the 2020 election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because of AB 4, the number of mail ballots rocketed from about 70,000 in 2016 to over 690,000 this year. The election was inevitably riddled with fraud and our hotline never stopped ringing. While the media and democrats accused us of making it all up, Our team began chasing down every lead. Our evidence came both from data scientists and from brave whistle blowers. Here's what we found, over 42,000, 42,000 people voted more than once.
Our experts were able to make this determination by reviewing the list of actual voters, and comparing it to other voters with the same name, Address and date of birth. This method was also able to catch people using different variations of their first name, such as William and Bell, and individuals who are registered both under a married name and a maiden name. At least 1500 dead people are recorded as voting, as shown by comparing the list of male voters with the social security death records. More than 19 15,000 people voted even though they didn't live in Nevada. This does not include military voters or students.
These voters were identified by comparing the list of voters with the US postal service's national change of address database, among other sources. About 8,000 people voted from non existent addresses. Here we cross referenced voters With the coding accuracy support system, which allowed our experts to identify undeliverable addresses. Over 15,000 votes were cast from commercial or vacant addresses. Our experts found these voters by analyzing official US Postal Service records that flag non residential addresses and addresses vacant for more than 90 days.
Incredibly, almost 4,000 non citizens also voted, as determined by comparing official DMV records of non citizens to the list of actual True voters in the 2020 election.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is the greatest criminal conspiracy in Arizona’s history, Plotted by the Secretary of State. Carried out by the Secretary of State. Executed by the Secretary of State. And certified by the Secretary of State Katie Hobbs. https://t.co/WP9IqjIkCJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
There were odd patterns in the ballots, with repeated anomalies over multiple days. Some ballots had a pattern of 7 for Biden and 1 for Trump, which is statistically unlikely. The patterns were reported, but it's unclear if they were included in the final report. The physical recount aligned with the claimed numbers, but behind the scenes, there were over 17,000 duplicate mail-in ballots. The audit suggests that over 60,000 counted ballots may be illegal, which could significantly impact the election outcome. Voting is considered the most important right in the United States, and having it stolen is devastating.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would watch the ballots go by, and there were odd patterns. I questioned the patterns of repeats that I saw. That is an anomaly that was repeated over multiple days.
Speaker 1: 7 of those ballots are for Biden, one for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump. That clearly doesn't that's not statistically
Speaker 0: possible. If I had a box of all vitamins and it didn't look like I had an old box of all vitamins, wouldn't I just, like, It sticks them in. We reported the patterns on
Speaker 2: the ballots, and, of course, we reported all of this to, the leads, but not quite sure if it actually got into the report.
Speaker 3: The physical recount or the physical balance Pretty much aligned with what they claim. What they didn't tell you is behind the scenes, there were 17,000 plus duplicate mail in ballots.
Speaker 4: The audit has revealed that possibly well over 60,000 of these counted ballots are illegal ballots. And without further investigation, we do not know whether a ballot is legal or illegal. And that must be determined. And the staggering difference in these numbers is way more than enough to alter and change every aspect of the outcome of this election.
Speaker 1: We've had something very unique in this country And that we have freedom and that we get to decide who our president is, who our vice president is, who our Our elected officials are. We get to choose.
Speaker 0: Your vote is your single most important right on Earth here in the United States. And to have that stolen from you is, I'm just bringing you to tears. Excuse me. It's the most important thing. The most important thing
Speaker 4: that we could do.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Katie Hobbs belongs in prison +37,000 security queries logs deleted +4000 registered/voted after deadline +11,000 voted not on voter rolls +18,000 voted/removed after election +74,000 ballots returned/counted NO RECORD EVER BIENG SENT OUT And Dominion’s best friend SHARPIES https://t.co/vs2fastaQn
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker highlights several concerning issues related to the recent election. They mention the deletion of security logs, thousands of voters registering and voting after the deadline, individuals voting who were not on the voter rolls, and ballots being sent without evidence. The speaker also mentions a memo from Maricopa County instructing the use of Sharpies on election day, which raises concerns about ballot validity. They suggest that Republicans who waited to vote on election day may have been affected by this. Overall, the speaker raises questions about the integrity of the election process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At me from the hearing last week, was the 37,000 plus security queries in March that occurred that where logs were deleted, the almost 4,000 registered voters, registered and then voted after the October 15th deadline. And then of course the 11,000 who voted, who weren't on the voter rolls the 7th November, but showed up in December on the 4th December. And then of course the 18 who voted and were removed from the roles after the election. But then the biggest data point that jumped out at all of us, was the fact that over 74,000 mail in ballots occurred without any evidence of anything having been sent to them. So this is where nearly 7, 7 times The total The delta, right.
And think about this, the memo that we now have found that Maricopa County sent out that said, hey, Sharpies are what the rule of the day will be on election day. And I just tried it last night on a regular piece of paper in my printer using a Sharpie as though I were filling in a bubble and clearly it bled through to the other side, which then of course calls into question the ballot and makes it have to be adjudicate. And the fact that Sharpies were encouraged just solely for election day really begs the question that as everyone knew, Republicans who waited to vote on election day as they did in my 4 counties, predominantly did show up on that day.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And the Arizona Senate Audit, Katie Hobbs sent 23,344 mail in ballots to voters who voted in the Arizona Nov 3, 2020 General Insurrection even though they moved. So who voted? https://t.co/8aQTmbBLYa
Video Transcript AI Summary
We compared the voter rolls to identify people who had moved but still voted by mail. We excluded cases where someone with the same last name still lived at the address. This led us to find 23,344 individuals who voted from addresses they no longer resided at. Mail-in ballots cannot be forwarded, so the only legal way for this to happen is if the voter knows the current resident and arranges to pick up their ballot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we went and took the voter rolls, and we compared them against this to see how many people might have moved, and based on statute 44 44 voters who voted via mail in ballots even though they showed in Melissa as having moved from that address. We accounted for the circumstances where a college student might have moved away from home or a family member might have moved somewhere else. So we actually eliminated all the all the cases where someone was still at that residence that had the same last name. That's how we came up with 23,344. So if your mail in ballot is sent to an address that you no longer live at, there should be no way for that for you to receive that mail in ballot, at least they're, you know, it's generally nice a way for you to reset mail ballot because mail in ballots are legally not allowed to be forwarded, so it can't be forwarded to your new address.
So the only way this situation could happen legally e is if you know the prior you know, if you know the current resident and you're able to meet with them and pick up your mail in ballot or somehow have some other arrangement to pick up your ballots were there. But still 23,344 people voted when they should no longer, you know, have access, you know, would not normally have access at that given address.
reSee.it AI Summary
Overnight, 45K registered voters were added and then removed in Maricopa County, Arizona for the 2022 general election. Official records show the following: 2,435,397 registered voters at the cutoff, 2,480,880 before L&A testing (including the extra 45K), and 2,435,397 after L&A testing. Any registrations after the cutoff are excluded from the election. Share to help the people of Maricopa get the answers they deserve.
@Curiousityfirst - DogAndBone @Curious Cat
BREAKING: 45K EXTRA REGISTERED VOTERS ADDED OVERNIGHT IN MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2022 GENERAL ELECTION then REMOVED THEM DURING AN ELECTION.👇 Cutoff 11th October 2,435,397 L&A Testing 12th October 2,480,880 Election Certification 2,435,397 According to their Maricopa County's own official records. Slide 1: Registered Voters as at the Cutoff 2,435,397 Slide 2: Pre L&A - 2,480,880 (extra 45K) Slide 3: Post L&A - 2,435,397 Slide 4: Chart for visual understanding Any registrations after the cutoff are excluded from the 2022 election. Please retweet and share so that the good people of Maricopa can ask and get the answers they deserve. #Trump @AZGOP #Arizona #Trump2024 #Elections2024 @KariLake @KariLakeWarRoom @BlehmLawAZ @LeadingReport @FSociety_1942 @Rach_IC @Ryan_L_Heath @WendyRogersAZ @Peoples_Pundit @RealAmVoice @realLizUSA @AbrahamHamadeh @TalkMullins @ShawnSmith1776 @pjcolbeck @PatrickByrne @TPPatriots @realAlexKolodin @RealAlexJones #MerryChristmas @ElectionWiz @ArizonaSunTimes @elonmusk @KristenNHammond @JenWEsq @j3669 @RealSKeshel @RealMarkFinchem
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here’s the USPS inadvertently exposing the 2020 Insurrection they facilitated “We went off the National Change of Address. 23,344 national change of address forms said they moved to another location yet those votes were cast in a election that was determined by 10,000 votes” https://t.co/R3UQd40AIo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the final report released to the public, which reveals that 23,344 mail-in ballots were sent to individuals who no longer lived at the address. Despite this, votes were still cast using those ballots. The speaker emphasizes that this is just one example of irregularities in the election, which was decided by a margin of 10,000 votes. They express their confusion and call for the attorney general to address this issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From 1 to 10 about your report you returned over. Do you believe 10 meaning we showed that and it was monumental? One meaning, well, we didn't really find anything. What do
Speaker 1: you think the report was? I think the final report that was released in public still shows that. I I mean, we have 20 23,344 mail in ballots that were mailed to an address that someone no longer lived in and yet votes were cast on them. And in election that was determined by 10,000 votes. Repeat that again for people
Speaker 0: repeat that again for people, please.
Speaker 1: 23,344 Mail in ballots that were mailed to an address that an individual no longer lived at. They'd moved away. And just so you know, like, what we are looking at, the data source we're looking at is the national change of address form. The national change of address gets filled out when you move and you go to the post office and say, I moved to this address. This is what this is what my new address is.
I want you to forward my mail. So we didn't go off of the neighbor said he moved and he might or might not have moved. We went off for national change of address. 23,344 national change of address forms said they moved to another location unless yet those votes were cast. Like, I can't think of any explanation as to makes any logical sense of that.
Now I've been working with this stuff long enough But there's been many times where I've been like, hey. There's no possible explanation of this. Oh, shoot. Now I learned a possible explanation. Maybe there is.
So I'm willing to give, you know, some Some error and some space there for maybe there's some explanation to it, but I it doesn't make any logical sense to me, and the attorney general needs to answer that. So election was considered over 10,000 votes, and we're talking about 23,344.
Speaker 0: And that's just one thing, folks.
Speaker 1: That's just one thing. That's just one thing.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is Secretary of State Katie Hobbs responding how she robbed two U.S. elections, 104,820 ballots examined 20, 232 mismatched signatures Meaning this is only 5% of the 1.9 million ballots cast just in Maricopa County alone and Katie Hobbs belongs in prison. https://t.co/KbNvNJpZRq
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the analysis of ballot curing in Maricopa County. They compare the conservative case, where 11.29% of ballots should have been cured, to the county's curing rate of 1.31%. The speaker highlights that the number of ballots that should have been cured is far greater than what the county actually cured. They also mention that based on the extended study, a minimum of 4,965 ballots should have been thrown out due to signature mismatches, compared to the county's 587. The conclusion is that the county's signature verification process is flawed, contradicting their claim of having a rigorous process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Redoing the analysis. Okay? So what do we find? We find in the most conservative case, 11.29%, 215,856 ballots should have been cured. Okay?
All right. So let's compare that now. So what that means is that when you line up in this 2nd analysis, more conservative analysis, it goes from 11% to 41%, but we've only used the 11.29% to put forward that 200 at minimum, 215,856 ballots should have been cured. That is far more than what the county cured, which is 25,000. Okay?
So that's the so discussion wise, you know, the county cured 25,000, which is 1.31%. And what we're saying here is that 11.29% should have been cured, which is about 10% 10 times more. Okay? Let's see this. One second here.
Okay. Someone says, alright. So that's what we did here. Sorry about that. And so this is what we find.
So the discussion is the following. If based on the extended study as you're seeing here, that yields a minimum signature mismatch rate of 12.29% and the county's post curing mismatch rate of 2.3%, that means 4,965 EVBs at minimum. That's what see right here should have been, thrown out versus 587. So that's important in such a close race. Alright?
And the conclusion that we have that we wanna put forward is the Malacca Maricopa County election department states that it has a rigorous signature verification process. If you read their stuff, they say they have a rigorous signature verification process, but they only cured 25,000. And our extended study confirms a pilot study and puts forward that they actually have a flawed signature verification process. That's our
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, Jordan Conrad, questions Miss Hobbs about authorizing additional testing and the signatures on mail-in ballot updates. He accuses her of being unaware that the signatures do not match those of the voters. Miss Hobbs, as the secretary of state, oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona. The conversation becomes heated, with the speaker using profanity and asking if Miss Hobbs said something disrespectful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is that you? Yes, sir. How's it going? Jordan Conrad with the Gateway the additional testing. Did did you authorize this?
Miss Hobbs? Miss Hobbs? What about the signatures on the mail in ballot updates? Are you are you aware of what those look like, that they look nothing like the signatures of the voter. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, we oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona either.
Fucking rest for I'm at the gym. Give it a effing grass. Is that what you said?
Video Transcript AI Summary
These are examples of approved and failed ballots. The Voter Privacy Act prohibits inspectors from examining ballots to verify signatures. Many of the reviewed ballots have two different patterns of the letter "S" in the signature, even though some owners' names don't contain an "S." In total, 104,820 ballots were reviewed, with 20,232 having mismatched signatures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now now L. Okay. Yeah. Clothes. These are examples of some that were later approved.
The the ones don't say they approved the they didn't get questions. Is that This example here, as you can tell, it is a failed. It Scaled and approved and there is written on the envelope See Enclosed Notes RE Signature. Once again, we go back to statute and the Voter Privacy Act which does not allow for an Inspector to look through a ballot for any faith to justify that signature. Mel.
As you guys can see, many of these ballots contain 2 essence Written in different patterns, we identified well over a 100 so far that have 2 S's documented for the signature Many of which didn't even contain an s in the name of the owner. The total balance we have reviewed today is 104,820. We got 20,232 mismatched signatures
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, The Arizona Audit CONFIRMS: Katie Hobbs utilized her single greatest crime of 2020 for the 2022 election. 25% of all 2020 mail-in-ballots equaling 420,987 ballots out of 1.9 million CONFIRMED to have NO signature match just in Maricopa County alone. https://t.co/eMyFdGhpTc
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Arizona audit, Maricopa County made it clear that signature verification was off-limits. However, it's easy to understand why they didn't want us to examine the signatures because, in reality, they don't match.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Talked about signature verification has been that 3rd rail in Maricopa County. You can't touch it. You can't talk about it. And that was really the line in the sand that the county drew during the Arizona audit. And it's not difficult to see why they don't want us looking at those signatures because guess what?
They don't match.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Signature verification is a process used to determine the legitimacy of a vote by comparing the voter's ballot envelope to the affidavit. In the 2020 election, 420,987 ballot envelopes failed signature verification, and the system was never fixed. As a result, the same issues persisted in the 2022 election, leaving the system vulnerable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So signature verification is a process by which you take the voter, ballot envelope and compare it to the affidavit in order to determine whether it's a legitimate vote. So there are 2 areas that we looked at that we wanna share with you today. The first one is the signature verification of 2020 and how that relates to 2022. 420,987 ballot envelopes failed signature verification in the 2020 election. The system was never repaired.
And because of that, those same issues that caused the massive amount of failures was still in existence in the 2020 election. In the 2020 in the 2022 election, which has left our system still vulnerable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election using 150 trained workers. They followed the guidelines in the secretary of state manual and analyzed each voter record individually. The statistics from the first 25% of the ballots were extrapolated to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 acknowledges that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, with about 1.9 million of them being mail-in ballots. Speaker 1 confirms this and the conversation continues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go back one slide. Who determined the the number 420,987 from the 2020 election? Is that your organization that determined there were that number of failed signatures, or was that the number reported by all of the counties in in Arizona?
Speaker 1: So madam chair, Senator Bennett, that number is based on a a, A review of a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the 2020 election. We used a 150 Trained workers that studied the secretary of state manual and followed those guidelines, And then they analyzed each voter record individually. Once we got the statistics for that first 25% or 400,000 ballots, Then it was extrapolated to determine the final number. Those are Maricopa County. That is just Maricopa County.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the point I was gonna make, madam chair, is I think Maricopa County alone, had 2,089,563 ballots in 2020, and 1 about 1,900,000 of them were by mail. And so Your group analyzed about 25 percent of those 1,900,000 in Maricopa County, Came up with a percentage that you considered to have failed signature verification, then you extrapolate it to get to the 429, 20,000.
Speaker 1: Madam chair, senator Bennett, that is correct.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Okay. Proceed.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, The Arizona Senate Audit CONFIRMS Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, There are 74, 243 mail in ballots that are TIED to individuals returned and cast in the Nov 3, 2020 election with NO RECORD of ever being SENT OUT. https://t.co/6jwN14wPtT
Video Transcript AI Summary
I ignored advice from a politician to avoid discussing the forensic audit, the 2020 election, distancing myself from President Trump, and questioning COVID vaccines and mandates. Instead, I visited the forensic audit site and openly talked about our corrupt elections. Now, more evidence is emerging every day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ben, I remember somebody who was in politics telling me when I first started, do not talk about the forensic audit. Don't talk about the 2020 election. Distance yourself from president Trump. And whatever you do, don't bring up COVID or question the vaccines or the mandates. And I looked at this guy, and I basically kicked him out.
And I took all of his suggestions and advice, and I threw it in the Trash can, and I immediately went down, and I toured the forensic audit site. And I started talking about our corrupt elections. And, you know, people have finally caught up. We're seeing some more evidence every single day come out.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Arizona, there are 74,243 mail-in ballots without a clear record of being sent. The state uses EB32s to track when a ballot is sent and EB33s to track when it is received. The number of EB32s should be higher than the number of EB33s. These 74,000 ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but there is no evidence that they were actually sent to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's EB32s and EB33s. EB32s is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent. And an EB33 is supposed to give a record of when the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EB32s more sent out than there are that are received.
Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to. And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is the Arizona Senate Audit, CONFIRMS: 3,981 people voted in the Maricopa County General 2020 Insurrection, despite registering to vote AFTER Katie Hobbs was reprimanded by a court and forced to move the registration date back to the original deadline of Oct 15th. https://t.co/HaDT15iHbf
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Arizona, there was a request to move the voter registration date to election day, but it was moved back to October 15th due to a court case. We found 3,981 individuals who registered after October 15th but their data shows that they have already voted in this election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we have, from what I understand here in Arizona, we are they originally were Hobbs had requested that the registration date for voting be moved up to election day, and there was actually a court case that moved it back to October 15th. Based on the registration information, that that we found in the voter rolls, we have 3,981 individuals who show us haven't voted in this election, and their data shows up in the canvases having voted in this election. However, they were they were rest registered after October 15th.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is, “We now know all of the different ways that are elections are rigged, taken, stolen, WHERE THE FRAUD IS and who is RESPONSIBLE for it” Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5M additional ballots, If Maricopa has 2,575,400 voters why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1M ballots? https://t.co/oEuSKsCFpI
Video Transcript AI Summary
We now know how elections are rigged, with Maricopa County mailing more ballots than voters. This shows extra ballots were printed to manipulate the election. States are avoiding scrutiny of ballots, and censorship of truth reveals we are on the right track.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what's going on is we now know all of the different ways that our elections are rigged, taken, stolen, where the fraud is, who's responsible for it, and how it happens. Short one. If Maricopa County has 2,005,400 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4,100,000 ballots? You know why? Because if you're gonna steal an election and it's going to be an election by mail predominantly, and if mail is the currency, mail is the contract that mail in ballot.
Well, if you're gonna swap ballots or or if you're gonna control it, you have to have extra ballots. Bottom line, they printed 1,500,000 additional ballots. That is why 2 things are occurring. All of these states are trying very hard to avoid us looking at the ballot. But the second thing, think about it.
If we were lying about what happened, if it was inconsequential, would they be censoring us? Do they censor people who don't matter? Do they censor topics that really are horse crap? No. They censor us because we have the goods, we have the truth.
So understand even censorship that's going on proves we're all on the right track.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the secret testing on election machines in Maricopa County, Arizona. He asks about discrepancies in signatures on mail-in ballots. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, oversaw elections in the area. Jordan expresses frustration and asks for a break while at the gym.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How's it going? Jordan Conrad with Gateway Plumbing. So, you know, I have some questions about the election in Arizona. You know, Maricopa County, they did these secret testing on the machines, which for the election procedures manual, you were supposed to oversee, do additional testing on. Did did you authorize this?
Miss Hobbs? Miss Hobbs, what about the signatures on the mailing ballot updates? Are you are you aware of what those look like? That they look nothing like the signatures of the voter? Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, we oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona either.
Fucking best for him. You mean I'm at the gym. Give it I'm at the gym. Give it a effing rest. Is that what you said?
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
🚨BREAKING🚨 + 10,000 illegal aliens, using the same exact social security number voted in the Nov 3, 2020 election, and this is just in the border state of Arizona, 📝Katie Hobbs belongs in prison, https://t.co/Zx8DKb6xAB
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found 10,000 people sharing one Social Security number, enabling illegal workers to avoid paying taxes. Employers use the same number for multiple workers, and the IRS overlooks the issue. This scheme allows non-citizens to obtain driver's licenses and voter registration. The government holds a $1.7 trillion slush fund, generating $100 million in interest monthly. This corruption is why some tried to silence us, revealing a unified political system benefiting from these practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We discovered 10,000 people using the exact Social Security number. See if this one rings true. You take an illegal. You bring them in. They sign a piece of paper promising to pay taxes.
What they get is a Social Security number so the employers can take out the taxes. Put a pin in that. Here's what they do. In cities like this, let's think of a chicken processor. They will bring in 100 of illegals.
They will spread them out across all of these plants and factories, giving them jobs. They're all using the same Social Security number. The IRS unconnected our names from the Social Security number. Now when you look it up, it just pings to see if there's an employer. If there is, it says it's good.
It validates it. Why do they do that? Because all of these factories are giving them Social Security numbers. The government turns its back on it. As soon as you have a Social Security number and you go over to motor voter, pass the driver's court, test.
Right? You get a driver's license. Suppression, look, you got a social. You must be a citizen. That's how they pack the roles.
By the way, those guys don't pay taxes anyway. It's taken out by companies. Our government's been sitting on $1,700,000,000,000 slush fund that that one fund has still in it to this day. So if you wanna know where the dark money comes from. By the way, that's what, a $100,000,000 in Per month.
A month in interest. I could go on. I now understand this is why they tried to kill us, and it's not stuff I wanted to know. It's not stuff I wanted to know about my country. It's not stuff I believed, But we have a uni party.
We don't have multiple parties. Everybody's benefited from this at one time or another.
@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington
Maricopa County’s OWN election records show they unlawfully counted over 20,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4, 2020 and later. That’s more than twice the election “margin.” Arizona’s elections are rigged. They have to arrest you in order to keep their corrupt power. https://t.co/Z0ECvkcGlF
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
380,000 + Ballot images missing from the 2020 election. Way too many suspicious ballots in 2020. How can this be called a fair election? https://t.co/DdJrQWduNL
Video Transcript AI Summary
The investigation confirms that there are missing ballot images. Specifically, 380,761 ballot images from the election day machine count are not available. We subpoenaed Fulton County for all ballot images and received about 518,000, but these pertain to the recount, not the election day count. Thus, the missing images are a result of the focus on the recount rather than the original election day data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does the investigation confirm that there are missing ballot images? Yes. Yes. Do you know why 380, 761 ballot images from election day machine count are not available?
Speaker 1: We subpoenaed Fulton County for all of their ballot images. We received approximately 518,000
Speaker 0: ballot images. From election day?
Speaker 1: Those are for the recount.
Speaker 0: Those are from the recount. But we we have no ballot images for 380,761 ballots from election day. Correct?
Speaker 1: What was subpoenaed was the ballot images for the recount because that's what this this case was about, not the election.
Speaker 0: Does the investigation confirm that there are missing ballot images? Yes. Yes. Do you know why 380,761 ballot images from election day machine count are not available?
Speaker 1: We subpoenaed Fulton County for all of their ballot images. We received approximately 518,000 ballot images.
Speaker 0: From
reSee.it AI Summary
Today marks 24 days since Election Day, and I believe every House and Senate seat flipped from Republican to Democrat should be investigated and audited. I question the origin of 80,000 votes. In the 2020 election, Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes allegedly inserted over 74,000 mail-in ballots without any record of them being sent out. This suggests Kari Lake actually won. I call for the arrest of Hobbs and Fontes, and I’m eager to meet the voters who supported Trump in Arizona, particularly in Maricopa County, which I view as the center of election fraud.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Today is November 29, 2024, 24 fucken days after Election Day, Every single House and Senate seat that was flipped from Republican to Democrat after Election Day, should be investigated, and forensically audited at once. WHERE DID THE 80K VOTES COME FROM? THIS👇IS ELECTION MONTH 2020. Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes inserted 74, 243 MAIL IN BALLOTS in the Nov 3, 2020 election that are tied to individuals, returned and cast with NO RECORD OF EVER BEING SENT OUT. Meaning, A: Kari Lake won AGAIN. B: arrest Katie Hobbs and Adrian Fontes, C: I would love to meet all those voters who voted Trump/Scumbag in Arizona specially in election fraud capital of Maricopa County,
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Arizona, there are 74,243 mail-in ballots with no clear record of being sent. The state uses EB32s to track when a mail-in ballot is sent and EB33s to track when it is received. Ideally, there should be more EB32s than EB33s, indicating that more ballots are sent out than returned. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but in this case, there is no clear indication that these 74,000 ballots were ever sent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Example, we have 74,243 mail in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent. And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona, there's EB32s and EB33s. EB32s is supposed to give a record of when a mail in ballot is sent. And an EB33 is supposed to give a record of when the mail in ballot is received. And so there should be an equal there should be more EV32s more sent out than there are that are received.
Specifically with these, we also we can tie them to a specific individual that was mailed to. And so we have 74,000 where we have and came back from individuals where we don't have a clear indication that they were ever sent out to them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ruben Gallegos has been running numerous ads, but recent court records reveal he served divorce papers to his pregnant wife just days before she gave birth. His new wife is a prominent DC lobbyist. Washington already has enough questionable characters; we shouldn't add another one to the Senate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ruben Gallegos run thousands of ads constructing a facade. Last week, it fell to pieces. Newly revealed court records show Gallegos blindsided his pregnant wife with divorce papers. Days before she gave birth, Diego's new wife, a powerful DC lobbyist. Washington has enough scumbags as it is.
One of the worst shouldn't be our next senator. Winnit Backpack is responsible for the content of this
@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington
Where did the 80K votes come from? Two counties in particular Gallego outperformed Harris by crazy margins Maricopa he got a 65K vote increase over Harris and in Yuma he got a 9,389 vote boost https://t.co/TxQsBlvMzp
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that Orange County reported over 300K more ballots than were returned by voters, and the total count exceeded registered voters by over 325,111. It's strange, and they're still counting votes, which seems unbelievable.
@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️
Did you know that Orange County counted over 300K ballots more than were returned by voters? Furthermore, the total count was similarly over 325,111 ballots above the number of registered voters in the country according to their own documents. Weird right? BTW, they're STILL counting votes - which is insane. https://joehoft.com/breaking-exclusive-huge-ballot-discrepancies-uncovered-in-orange-county-ca-that-could-flip-multiple-us-house-seats/#google_vignette
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: HUGE Ballot Discrepancies Uncovered in Orange County, CA that Could Flip Multiple US House Seats | Joe Hoft
The 2024 Election results in Orange County, CA make no sense. The first indication that something was up in Orange County was on Thursday, November 7, two days after the 2024 Election. Concerned citizens warned that "Newscum" had sent people to Orange County and that GOP ballots needed to be cured. The races for the
joehoft.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I state that Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020, during the counting delay, implying ballots that never existed. I note 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots were sent and ask why 4.1 million were mailed for 2.6 million voters, suggesting backfilling. I urge passage of the SAVE Act; Election Day should be election day.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Here it is: The single most damning piece of evidence of election treachery in the entire 2020 election: Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots one month after the November 3, 2020, election. “During the period when they needed extra time to count—which is now something they do in every election (they didn’t do it before; it’s new since 2020, and now they do it every time)—they picked up (i.e., manufactured) 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now, how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system one month after the election—after the fact—when you can’t prove they were in the system before the fact?” 📝 Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots. “If Maricopa has 2,595,272 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1 million mail-in ballots?” Backfilling. 📝 Pass the SAVE Act. Election Day is not election week, election month, or election year.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a sequence of figures regarding Maricopa County’s 2020 election and asserts inconsistency between tallies and ballots. He begins: there were 2,595,272 registered voters; 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and all counting; yet there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. He notes, “They called the election at 2,089,512 votes,” but emphasizes that the closing canvas shows a different number, counting the actual codes on paper rather than pieces of paper, yielding 1,923,693 numbers that show up.
After post-adjudication, he lists key observations. By the time voting closed, 165,819 ballots were missing, which he states is 7.94% of the votes in 2020, and they could not explain where they were. However, about a month later in Arizona, a new total was produced: 2,086,959, still leaving 2,553 ballots missing as of that adjustment. He notes that Biden was said to have won by 10,500 votes.
He then describes a process he calls the “time hack,” alleged to have been used to gain extra counting time—a practice he claims is new to 2020 and has continued in subsequent elections. He asserts that they “picked up, i.e., manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed.” He questions how ballots could enter the system after the fact if they did not exist beforehand, asserting this as evidence of manipulation.
To support the claim, he cites machine outputs: “Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa,” while there were only 2,595,272 registered voters, yet 4,027,968 ballots printed. He states these numbers come directly from the machines and argues that no one scrutinizes them deeply enough. He asks why Maricopa would print 1,432,696 overprints, suggesting that to fabricate missing numbers, “backwards ballots” are needed to fill those gaps during the time hack. The argument continues that ballots must be suspended from hitting the bottom line—“don’t let them hit the bottom line”—and, once the numbers are known, could be replaced with whatever is needed. He implies that such suspended ballots are not present in either the pre- or post-audit tallies.
Finally, he asserts that a proper audit would have all numbers cross-referencing across every manifestation; otherwise, the cross-referencing would reveal the inconsistencies. The overall gist is a claim of missing ballots, late adjustments, a large number of overprints, and a so-called time hack used to manipulate counts, with an emphasis on the need for cross-referenced auditing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Era Copa, even though they had 2,595,272 registered voters, and they said 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and every and all the counting, there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. Now think about that. They called the election at 2,089,512 votes. But at the closing of the books in the actual canvas, when you look at these numbers, not counting pieces of paper. Remember, I'm counting something different.
I'm counting the actual codes on the paper. There are only 1,923,693 numbers that show up. That's called the pre. After they did their post adjudication, which was after the election, here's what you need to see. Number one, by the time they closed out voting, there were a 165,819 ballots missing.
They could not explain where they were. That's 7.94% of the votes in 2020. They could not tell you where they were. However, mysteriously, after all of those days and a month later, a month later in in Arizona, they came up with the number of 2,086,959. Now please notice that's still 200 two two thousand five hundred and fifty three ballots missing.
And to this day, they'll tell you that Biden won by 10,500 votes. Here's what you need to understand. In that process of time, the time hack where they needed extra time to count, which is now something they're doing in every election. They didn't do it before. It's new to 2020, and now they do it every time.
They picked up, I e, manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system after the fact that you can't prove came into the system before the fact? Now remember, I showed you other ways to audit this and catch it. It's done.
Well, here's how Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa. They only have 2,595,272 registered voters. They printed for Maricopa, 4,027,968 ballots. These numbers come out of the machines. They are what they are when they roll off the line.
These are their numbers. It's nobody looks deeper enough. So why would Maricopa print 1,432,696 overprints? Why would they do that? Because if you're going to do this, if you're gonna make up missing numbers, you've gotta have those backwards ballots to do it because what happens is you're feeling you're filling in when it comes to the time hack.
The time hack is what you need. You have to have two things. You have to be able to suspend ballots, meaning don't let them hit the bottom line. In 2020 with Sharpengate, in 2022 in Arizona, it was okay. We can't scan it.
Drop it in box number three. You have to suspend them from hitting. And then once you know the numbers, you can put in whatever you want. That's why they don't exist in the pres. They don't exist in the post.
Folks, when your audit's right, all of your numbers cross reference each other and crisscross. Regardless of how you find it, you should be able to find it in every single manifestation.