reSee.it - Related Post Feed

KimDotcom
Posted - April 14, 2023 at 10:37 AM
Saved - April 15, 2023 at 4:49 AM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

The deep state media lies and lies and lies to the American people and when someone comes forward with the truth they want to help the Government to destroy them. The US has reached a new low and I feel sorry for Americans. The worst is yet to come. https://t.co/DLN3BjQLaZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the role of media corporations in hiding important information and punishing whistleblowers. They argue that true journalists should celebrate those who expose government lies, but instead, media corporations collaborate with the government to keep secrets and punish leakers. The speaker questions how journalists can hide the fact that the US is in a direct hot war with Russia, suggesting that their loyalty lies more with the government than with the American people. They emphasize the importance of defending truth tellers and not abetting lies in a country built on falsehoods.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Coming on. I I should say and I I don't know. Just be quiet and let you speak since you know this better than anyone. But we left out a lot of details that are being in the Washington Post and New York Times, etcetera, tonight about the leaker and where this all came from. Because, honestly, I don't believe anything. And it's very hard to know what's true. We're all being spun. We're all being lied to. And we just didn't wanna repeat the lies. So with that, what do you make of this? Speaker 1: I can't think of a incident, Tucker, that reveals more vividly the real function of our nation's largest media corporations than what just happened here. If you're a real journalist, somebody who's devoted to transparency, Bringing shining a light on the most powerful government actors when they lied to the American people and informing the public. You would be celebrating this person Who stepped forward and risked his security to show his fellow citizens that the government was lying about this incredibly important war with a nuclear armed power that we have actual troops deployed on the ground in Ukraine. There's gonna be no diplomatic resolution throughout least 2023. That Zelensky is planning on using our weapons to strike deep into Russia, which we were told would never happen, risking escalation. He did the job of what journalists claim to do, which is show the public the truth. If you work for the intelligence agencies, you would be furious at this person. You would hate him imposed. All the people who were at that Pentagon briefing today think the way the CIA and the Pentagon thing. They hate this person. It was the New York Times and the Washington Post That did the FBI's work and found the leaker and led the FBI to him. They're demanding that he be punished. They're demanding that the government clamp down And keep things more and more secret. What kind of journalist would ever do that? Would wanna seal, leak, or expose, and punish, and then demand that the government Keep even more secret. But that is what this these these media corporations are there to do. They love leaks When the CIA and Homeland Security tell them to leak, that's when they disseminate propaganda to the public. Like they did during the Trump years when they leaked rep the transcript between Michael Flynn and Ambassador Kislyak, the most serious kind of leaking crime. The Washington Post did that. Nobody looked for that leaker. Nobody cared. Everybody cheered. Because it served the interests of the security state. But when it comes to transparency that undermines the agenda of these agencies and that proves to the American people what the truth is, rep It's amazing that these journalists are on the side of the government and will actually hunt down the leaker and demand that he be punished even more. Speaker 0: I just don't understand how any journalist could collaborate in hiding the fact that we're in a direct hot war with Russia. Maybe you support that, maybe you don't. But how could you hide something that's significant? The most significant fact of our generation from the public. How could you do that? Speaker 1: It the only answer is that you don't actually have a journalistic mindset that you far more by with your with your job is working for the government, then working for the American people. If you look at the history of the most important journalism stories, it's exactly Insiders like Daniel Ellsberg sees that the government is lying to the American people about the war in Vietnam. Saying we're winning, when in reality privately, rep they're saying we're losing and he goes and he shows the the American people the truth. Or Edward Snowden who heard James Clapper falsely deny the NSA was spying on American Speaker 0: you have to defend truth tellers. You cannot abet lying if you have an entire country based on lies.
GlockfordFiles
Posted - June 3, 2023 at 1:41 PM
Saved - June 3, 2023 at 3:53 PM

@GlockfordFiles - Glockford Files

Most of us already know this but the intelligence agencies control a majority of the media. It’s state run propaganda and it protects their puppet China Joe Biden and attacks any politician that they don’t control. #Trump2024

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 wishes for Joe Biden to be interviewed in the same manner as them. They mention seeing Biden walking out of a store with ice cream and being asked about the flavor instead of important matters. Speaker 0 believes Biden is not being held accountable for his actions and suggests ending the interview.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wish you would interview Joe Biden like you interview me. It would be so good. You know what? But when I watch him walk out of a store and he's walking with a ice cream. And the question the media asked him Mister president, what are you doing? Choco choco chip. No. What kind of ice cream? What flavor ice cream do you have? And he's in the midst of a scandal. He's not. And he's taking pussy, Josh. Come on. I think we have enough of an interview here, Hope. Okay. That's enough. Let's go. A
bambkb
Posted - September 9, 2023 at 3:03 PM
Saved - September 10, 2023 at 12:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a world controlled by drug cartels, media and politicians are bought off, forcing people to stay locked up unless they consume the cartels' drugs. Despite the media's manipulation, we are the silenced majority. The media shapes our perception, making us unaware of the truth. Without the media, the New World Order's plans would crumble. It's time to break free from this illusion. People must unite and seek the truth beyond the media's influence.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

Woody Harrelson : “The movie goes like this: A bunch of drug cartels get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force everyone in the world to stay locked up in their homes and people can only come out IF they take the Cartel’s drugs, over and over and over again!?” People know what happened, people are NOT stupid!!! The only problem is the media!! The media makes people feel like we’re in the minority, but the #TRUTH is : we are the SILENCED MAJORITY!! You might not realize this BUT the media creates our perception - we don’t really talk amongst each other about all the crazy things that happen, we just trust that the media will kinda keep us up to date and that’s why they’ve been able to manipulate public perception for so long!! Just because a group of 100 people have an opinion or thought, doesn’t mean the whole country/world does, it’s one BIG illusion!! The media is the #DeepState’s number one and MOST POWERFUL tool!! Without the media, the #NWO and their plans are dead in the water!!!

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the movie, the plot revolves around the largest drug cartels joining forces to purchase the media and politicians. They continue to dominate the drug trade while evading suspicion. The speaker finds this idea absurd and questions who would believe such a far-fetched concept.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So the movie goes like this. The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and cartels drugs and keep taking them over and over. I've turned the script away. I mean, who is gonna believe that crazy idea?
No_Curve
Posted - October 23, 2023 at 10:49 PM
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 2:09 AM

@No_Curve - Rufus_2688

Just a reminder 🚨 THAT… Some members of the media… Use their platform… To push their own personal bias and agenda 😳 To contol exactly what people say and think 🤯 THIS IS EXTREMEMELY DANGEROUS TO OUR DEMOCRACY 🍆💦 https://t.co/bFSaoSwYqr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal agendas.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Unfortunately, some members of the media some members of the media some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal minds
BrandonStraka
Posted - October 24, 2023 at 6:38 PM
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 8:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The plea deal system must be abolished. Corrupt prosecutors manipulate innocent people to plead guilty in their pursuit to target Donald Trump. Jenna Ellis is not guilty. Prosecutors should be required to prove their cases instead of overcharging and pressuring individuals into false admissions. The complicit media aims to destroy conservative America, fostering division and mistrust. Don't be deceived by their lies and narratives.

@BrandonStraka - Brandon Straka

The plea deal system must be abolished. This is how evil, corrupt prosecutors are getting innocent people to plead guilty in their lunatic pursuit to get Donald Trump. Jenna Ellis is not guilty. None of this would be happening if these prosecutors were forced to PROVE their cases, and not abuse the law by hideously overcharging people to the point of overwhelming them financially, emotionally, and practically- then saying, “all of this goes away if you just plead guilty, and apologize publicly for a wrongdoing that we’re making up”. The media (which once existed to challenge the establishment, but is now the VOICE of the establishment) is 100% complicit in all of this. I don’t believe for a second that any of these people are “flipping on Trump” because the media says so. What the media wants more than anything is to destroy conservative America. They want to orchestrate division, sew mistrust, cause people to turn on each other, and destroy people’s lives. They have only one job- aid and abet the evil dealings of the Democrat Party. Don’t fall for any of their lies and their narratives.

ShadoeDavis
Posted - November 28, 2023 at 8:11 PM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 11:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canadian media corruption: a personal account. Incompetence and subversion: a manager with no radio experience criticized my "right-wing views." The new breed: a producer indoctrinated in CRT dismissed my concerns about racism against white people. Workplace sensitivity training and bullying: mandatory sessions promoting a Marxist narrative. Pressure from management led to my constructive dismissal. Media compromised by pervasive implementation of biased policies. #CanadianMediaCorruption

@ShadoeDavis - The Shadoe Davis Show

I spent many years in Canadian media and I knew it was corrupt but these new levels of corruption are well beyond anything I ever thought. I wish I could put my finger on just one thing about all this but that’s impossible as it’s a combination of things. 1) Incompetence and subversion: During my final years on radio I was the morning host at Winnipeg’s @680CJOB The manager was brought over from the TV side of the operation and knew nothing about radio. He was a camera operator who graduated through the ranks , how I have no idea but there he was trying to coach me somehow. I went along with it for a time but then a few months in he said something I will never forget. “Shadoe your right wing views are becoming a big problem.” “Excuse me?” I said. Then he mumbled something I couldn’t quite make out and a few seconds later we were interrupted by a knock on the office door. At the time my “right wing views” consisted of wanting a balanced government budget and finding the trans movement ridiculous. I asked him about it a week later and he tried to gaslight denying he would ever say such a thing. He did say it. I’ve since wondered how much that played in what was to come. 2) The New Breed: I had a morning show producer, a young woman relatively new to the industry. She was put in charge of the content of my show as I could not be trusted even though that was never said out loud. It was intimated I should be happy to have the help. I liked her and we got along rather well but one morning we were having a lively discussion about racism in which she said, “Shadoe you cannot be racist against white people.” I was discussing the hiring practices of governments at all levels and wondered why there were so few “white people” in front line jobs. I said “of course you can, racism is racism.” She was shocked speechless by that and walked away. Things were never quite the same after that. I didn’t understand it then in 2017 but she’d been indoctrinated into CRT, probably in journalism school. From there I noticed that every younger member of the newsroom carried the same attitude & looked down upon those who disagreed. 3)Workplace sensitivity training & bullying: During my last few months there, once a week the company brought somebody in to discuss “feelings, racism, sexism, bullying and safe spaces” with the staff usually via zoom. I attended the first one for 15 minutes then got up and left. I could not be a part of the complete crap they were dishing and said as much to the manager during a meeting the next day. He told me I was setting a poor example for the rest of the staff considering my influential position. My response was, “I am setting a tremendous example to the staff by not attending.” It was not mandatory, at least not while I was there, but it was heavily pushed to the point that if you didn’t take part you would be ostracized in the hallways out of fear or righteousness depending on the person or group. After that the pressure on me from management mounted. It was clearly a constructive dismissal in play & the only thing to do, especially with my mental state at the time, was to go to my Dr. and have him authorize stress leave which I took. I returned a month later and was fired 3 months after that. At the time I was relieved and devastated at the same time but now looking back it’s all very clear. Play the game or your career is over. The game these days is to obscure facts that don’t align with a clearly Marxist narrative and to insinuate anybody that doesn’t go along is “anti” this or “denier” that. And guess what? 99% of the corporate “journalists” are playing. I’ve never seen a corporate directive to implement these types of policies as mandatory because legally they can’t, however I believe it is intentionally pervasive and comes right from the top. They start with one key staff member then watch it spread. It’s insidious and in my opinion that’s how the media has been compromised. Feel free to repost.

listen_2learn
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 8:38 PM
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 8:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the connection between disinformation, censorship, and control over the masses. They argue that this leads to social engineering and the suppression of critical thinking. Additionally, they claim that the media serves as a propaganda tool for the establishment and is an enemy of freedom.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Disinformation = censorship = control the message to control the masses = hive mind = social engineering to produce compliant global citizens not questioning critical thinkers https://t.co/oN7KTKdjal

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the media and their desire for censorship. They argue that the left defines "disinformation" as any information that conflicts with their ideology. They mention Francis Fukuyama, a respected historian, who suggests rethinking the First Amendment. The speaker claims that those in power frame censorship as combating bad ideas, but it is really about maintaining control. They argue that power is the only principle that matters to those in the hierarchy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stand these people in the media. I promise you it's not enough. They don't want you to here's the thing too. This is why they're so keen on censorship. They mentioned it in the article in the beginning, the Time article, where he points out how they pressured social media companies to censored disinformation. Disinformation for them mean that word means nothing. Remember The Princess Bride? I don't think that means what you think it means. This information to the left is simply information they don't like that conflicts with their ideological agenda. I know you all get that. I don't mean to kind of be redundant on it. They mentioning that. You ever hear this guy, Francis Fukuyama? If you haven't, you should. He wrote this book about the end of history. He's a very well respected historian. Used to be across kind of the the political aisle, the the swampies love this guy. This is one of the most amazing things I've ever had to cut it down to like a minute or so. But again, this was a guy the swamp adores, is like one of the The the the the the chieftains of actual historians, here he is openly On video and audio, doing this interview, talking about how, you know, we really gotta rethink this whole first amendment thing going forward, because here's the thing about hierarchy and tyrants. They can't have you notice what they're doing. If they did, they would just tell you, we're censoring you because we don't like you. They frame it as disinformation and The new democracy, the old democracy, people were polluted by bad ideas. We're just cleaning up the bad ideas. Check it out. Speaker 1: The question then becomes, how do you actually regulate Content that you think is noxious, harmful, and and the like, and do it in a way that's consistent with the first amendment. But I think You can push the boundaries a bit because the first amendment does not allow you to say anything you want. But Among liberal democracies, you know, our first amendment law is, you know, among the most expansive, of any developed democracy. And you could imagine a future world in which we kinda pull that back and we say, you know, we're gonna have, You know, a law closer to that of Germany where we can designate the government can designate something as hate speech and then, You know, prevent the dissemination of that. But the question then is, politically, how are you gonna get there? Speaker 0: Folks, again, we always I'm like the duke of receipts. We always bring the facts to back it up. Oh, they're not calling for new laws restricting speech. You just aren't this guy. What else could you possibly wanna hear? You understand now why they just here's what they wanna do. The hierarchy is all about power. If they don't care about any of their principal's power. This is my end of the year message. When you understand that, everything else makes sense. Oh my gosh. They're talking about this, but that looks hypocritical. Again, they throw gays off buildings in Iran and then the gay lobby supports the Iran deal. It doesn't matter. They see it as a path to power. They don't care. There's no other principle involved. And when you need power, you need people to support

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://t.co/usR0OykTBq

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

What is happening here is happening in all western “democracies” as they must destroy the west in order to transition to a one world technocratic fascist totalitarian government. The media is the propaganda arm of the establishment. They are the enemy of freedom. https://t.co/rUtfK6MDhx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the mainstream media for spreading propaganda and gaslighting the population on various issues like energy transition, migration, COVID, and lockdowns. They express a lack of trust in the media and government, stating that they have not seen any actions to regain that trust. The speaker also discusses new laws on misinformation and disinformation, arguing that they are aimed at entrenching those in power and undermining democracy. They question the idea of preventing certain political figures or parties from winning elections, emphasizing that it should be the people's choice, not the elites'.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know this is a harsh thing to say, and they must stop falling for the propaganda from the mainstream media because that is what it is. I'm very sorry to say this. These are harsh words, and I would have not said the same thing 6 months ago, but they are gaslighting the entire population. The numbers are there, right, again, from the energy transition to migration to agricultural policy, to COVID, to lockdowns. The populations of the west have been gaslit on all major issues. We can no longer trust them. I mean, can they earn back our trust? I would say so. But so far, I see action or evidence that they're trying to do so. They try to entrench those who are in power even further. And you see this also on the European level, all these new laws about misinformation and disinformation and malinformation. This is just this absurd idea. Basically, you wanna fortify democracy against any change of those who are in power, which is the very opposite of what democracy is supposed to be. The whole point of democracy is that if a government does a bad job, you can vote them out. The new approach is even if we do a bad job, we have to change the institutions in a way that we can never get out of office again. This is when they say, we cannot allow Donald Trump to win. Like, we cannot allow the AFD to win. But the question is, why not? It's the people's choice, not yours. If you really think you're entitled to power, that's the first sign that you have lost any entitlement to power because that's the least democratic thing, the least democratic position you can ever hold.
KariLake
Posted - March 4, 2024 at 3:21 AM
Saved - March 4, 2024 at 6:12 PM

@KariLake - Kari Lake

There’s no salvaging the Fake News. They are The Enemy of the People. These propagandists have brainwashed millions of Americans for decades. Thankfully they are collapsing under the weight of their lies. https://t.co/lmQXsFuo0R

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Barrasso expresses his support for Carrie Lake and believes she is a responsible voice for Arizona. He emphasizes the need to bring people together and win the 2024 election for the US Senate. When asked about reaching out to moderate Republicans, he states that it is going well and he is gaining support from those who previously did not support him. He also mentions the importance of securing the border and working with Republicans, Independents, and even disaffected Democrats to address the border crisis. The interviewer questions Senator Barrasso about his comments regarding Cindy McCain and recording conversations, to which he clarifies his intentions and expresses his focus on the future. The discussion then shifts to election integrity and the bipartisan border plan. Senator Barrasso highlights the need to finish building the border wall and stop catch and release policies. He criticizes President Biden's actions and attributes the border crisis to his policies. The interview concludes with Senator Barrasso urging the interviewer to move on from past elections and focus on the pressing issues at hand.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Thank you guys both for sitting down, talking with me today. And I want to start with you, Senator Barrasso. A lot of people see you coming out here campaigning for Carrie Lake is kind of a sign that the establishment is giving her more of an embrace that maybe you can broaden the message and reach people, Republicans who didn't vote for Carrie in her run for Governor. What do you say to people, Republicans right now, who did not vote for Carrie Lake, 2 years ago? What do you say to them this time around? Speaker 1: Well, she's very forceful. She's effective. I think she's a responsible voice for the people of Arizona, and we need her in the United States Senate. I was the 1st senator, republican senator to endorse her. She was in Washington. We had a chance to meet. I had watched her previous to that with a number of various interviews that she did. My wife and I watched her. She she's the future of our party. We need her. I wanna do everything I can to, help bring more people together and make sure she wins this election in 2024 for the US senate. And a lot has been made, Speaker 0: in the media, you've made a deal about trying to reach out to folks like your former opponents, Karen Taylor Speaker 2: Ropes and Speaker 0: Megan McCain that's been in the news a lot. I want to ask you how has that been working, reaching out to more moderate Republicans considering you did call them a lot of folks rhinos and you weren't happy with certain elements of the party. How is that message being taken right now? Speaker 2: I think it's going well. I I really do and and we've talked about this before, you and I have. I I don't wanna, tell the world everybody I'm meeting with because I I don't want them to be dragged into a news story unnecessarily. I am gaining a lot of support with people who didn't previously support me. I had a lot of support before and I'm just adding. It's a game of addition, they say politics is. But more important than just adding to my support, I wanna bring people together. We're so divided as a country. I do put a lot of the blame on the media for that. I I'm working in the media for a long time. I know it's about keeping people afraid, divided, isolated. And it's done a a a lot of damage to our country. So I wanna bring people together. We're gonna have a big cleanup job to do, and it's gonna take all hands on deck. That means all Republicans. It's gonna take Independents to come in. Even disaffected Democrats are waking up to these policies that just aren't working. I know that the people who are watching your station tonight are looking at the border crisis. They're hearing about stories like Lake and Riley who was murdered by somebody here illegally. He shouldn't have even been here. Another story that I talked about today, murder when somebody was deported 4 times and they're still committing crimes and still coming back. We have to secure the border. It's starting to affect every single American. And so I want to work to bring Republicans together to do that, Independents, Democrats. I'm meeting with all kinds of Arizonans. Some of them are traditional Republicans. Some of them are MAGA Republicans, and we're gonna work together. We're going to get the majority in the US Senate. And when we get that, we're gonna take all kinds of Republicans. Some are gonna be from states that are a little more, purple or even blue. I think we might even have a win in some of the blue states with Republicans. They have to represent their constituents. And when we get together in the Senate, we are going to work together. The people of this country are going to demand it. Speaker 0: And speaking of moderates and whatnot, you said that your one attack McCain got a lot of attention that drove a stake to the heart of the McCain machine. You said that was in jest, correct? Speaker 2: Well That Speaker 0: was in jest. Speaker 2: No. This was a this was a different comment, but that comment refers to a political apparatus here in Arizona that had a grip on politics, and it was really hard for the grassroots to take any movement and get in. Mhmm. And I believe that with my victory in the primary, for the governorship, we did show the grassroots has power in this state. And the grassroots do have power. That's how this government is supposed to be from the bottom up. And the grassroots have a lot of power. I wanna bring people in who are more establishment, traditional as well. I truly am extending an olive branch. I mean it. If you weren't with me before, I want you with me because we gotta save our country. Speaker 0: But with with you know, but there was a lot of attention on that one comment that you guys have said that was a joke or a jest. I do wanna ask you though, but you also, went after Cindy McCain when you run for government. Speaker 2: How did I go after you? Speaker 0: You had said that she was in cahoots with George Soros that, to defeat America and whatnot. I was wanting to say, is that Speaker 2: Is that a direct quote? Speaker 0: That was you on the Steve Bannon show, I believe. Speaker 2: Okay. Well Is Speaker 0: that something you really still believe about them? Speaker 2: Cindy McCain works for the Biden administration, and I appreciate the hard work she's done in this state. And if she decides she wants to vote for me, I don't think she's actually living here right now, so I don't think she is voting. I wanna reach all people. And if Cindy McCain decides she wants to come and vote for me, I will welcome that. If she wants to support me, I will welcome that. I wanna get Arizonans who are voting to see that our policies work. You know, a lot of times you've talked about me focusing on the past, focusing on the past. I'm looking forward. I'm looking to the future. And our future can either be very bright and be excellent for our young people and our children, or it could be very bleak. And right now, you're focusing on the past. The the people of Arizona don't care about this. Speaker 0: They wanna know who you are. Speaker 2: They don't. They know who I am. I've been in their homes for 27 years. Speaker 0: They wanna know who you are because you'd said things in the past and you're you're correcting that now or changing that now. Speaker 2: Dennis, you need to you need to move on. We're we are bringing people together, and they know who I am. They they know I'm a fighter. They know that I care deeply about this community. I've raised my family in this community, and they know that I care about that border. They know that I had a policy that was so good on that border that Greg Abbott is now doing that in Texas, and it's working. I wanna solve these problems. I'm not worried about, squabbles. I'm I'm moving forward. I can't go backwards. I can only move forward, and I'm gonna move forward and help the people of the state. I'm gonna win this seat and help bring the majority back to the senate so we can solve some of these problems that we've been dealing with for a long time. Speaker 0: Okay. Let me ask Senator Barrasso this question, too. This question was asked at the press conference, didn't seem like it was very popular question, but I didn't want to ask this. Working in the Senate, Carrie Lake, there's a lot of attention given to a recording she had taken of Jeff to what the former campaign party chair. Can you trust that, you know, she can be trusted in backroom conversations, candid conversations that she won't be recording people or anything like that. Because the senate Speaker 2: Dennis, this is ridiculous. The people of this country don't care about this. You would have The the senator you've been in the phone. A conversation if someone showed up at your door and said, I gotta tell you something. You can't I can't tell it on the phone. I was nervous about it. I thought there would be a threat in it. And I have every right. I didn't break any laws. Yeah. I have every right. And you're spending time sitting with the sitting senator. I'm asking the sitting senator Speaker 0: about whether she can be trusted in it. Speaker 1: I have great confidence in Carrie Lake as a senator in the United States. We'd love to have her from representing the people of Arizona as a forceful, effective, conservative voice for the country. We need her in the United States Senate. I think she'd be a great addition to the senate and make a big difference for our country moving forward getting back on track. Speaker 2: And and the only people I record, frankly, are people that come to my door and try to bribe me. If you come into my home and try to bribe me, there's a chance I might record you. And guess who else I record? Every interaction I have with the fake news media. Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 2: Because as you know, the first interaction we have I'm aware. How dishonest the fake news media is. Nobody trusts them. And so I record that. And I think not only should every politician record every interaction they have with the media, I think every American should record every interaction they have with the media because you've proven time and time again that you can't be trusted, that you can't be trusted. Speaker 0: That me personally can't be trusted? Speaker 2: That the news can't be trusted. Yeah. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, I do want to ask, I know you don't want to go back, but there are questions. Speaker 2: Oh, boy, Dennis, really, we have a wide open border. Where are we going back now? What what year are we going back to now, Dennis? Welcome back to the seventies. You put your bell bottoms Speaker 0: on. Too young to have bell bottoms in the seventies. Let's go back to the election stuff. I mean, there was an opinion Speaker 2: Dennis Dennis Dennis. Speaker 0: There was an opinion piece today by the guy who was supposedly hired by Donald Trump to find election fraud. He wrote an opinion piece in the Republic Dennis. Said he didn't find it. Speaker 2: Dennis, I'm not you you have I'm not going to entertain any more questions about the past election. Speaker 0: But Speaker 2: the election's not And election fraud because the headline Speaker 0: is is a lot is is a lot about who you are, about your brand as a politician. Speaker 2: It's not a brand. I wanna have honest elections that people have faith in. And and guess what, Dennis? The polling shows that Republicans don't have faith in our elections, neither do independents. And an increasing number, it's getting close to half of Democrats, think we need election reform. And I'll end it with that. Speaker 0: Well, senator, do you have faith in our elections? Speaker 1: I have faith that the people certainly in my home state of Wyoming do it right. It's a state by state issue. I am against what the democrats are trying to do, and they're trying to federalize the elections where you wouldn't have to have identification. You just go up and ask for a ballot. I think we should have photo IDs, and I wanna make sure that states have the right to make sure that they have the integrity in their own state. You wanna make it easier to vote and harder to cheat, and that's not what the Democrats seem to be trying to do right now. Speaker 0: Yeah. And and and you said recently you didn't know who stole the election. Speaker 2: You know, because I want to focus on the future, because I know that the media has not covered it well, have not covered our cases well. It's all in the court documents. Go look at it. But I'm not gonna sit here when we have a few minutes to talk about the issues that are facing Americans at the border with the crime soaring. And we all All you wanna do we'll have stories about what we're gonna do is focus on the past. It's actually Speaker 0: almost comical. No. That is not the truth because we will we will air stories about the press conference. You talked about the Speaker 2: press release. Let me let me tell you this. I'm actively involved in cases. And as you know, I'm actively involved in a lawsuit. Yeah. Speaker 0: I know. Speaker 2: I anybody who's involved in a lawsuit, their attorneys would tell them not to go into specific details. And so, therefore, I'm going to do that. Okay? Speaker 0: Well, how how how Speaker 2: how how how how how how how how how how Speaker 0: how Kim Yi had a 100,000 more votes than you in a rigged election? She's a Republican too. Speaker 2: Really? We're gonna keep relitigating. Speaker 0: No. I've not asked you that, and I am interested in your explanation. Speaker 2: Well, Dennis, I am willing to talk about the border. That's why we we are here today. We're talking about the border and, you know, you guys have criticized me for several years now for talking about elections. I wanna talk about the 2024 election versus Ruben Gallego. By the way, if I you wanna talk about voting, Ruben Gallego wants everybody pulling across this border, wants to give them right to vote. That's 9,000,000 people, maybe 12,000,000. I'm not sure I believe the federal government's numbers. He wants them all to be able to vote, and I don't think the American people want that. I don't want that, and the American people don't want that. If you have any more questions about Speaker 0: the border question about the border, but I do. The Kim Yi thing is interesting because she had a 100,000 more votes than you in a rigged election. I am curious and interested, and I think people are interested in Speaker 2: the explanation. Shows you there's so many anomalies and things that don't make any sense. There are so many things that don't make sense about the statistics involving that election. And I know that you really don't care to dig into it because of the coverage, the lack of coverage. So we'll we're gonna end it at that. And, please let the record show that Dennis and 3 TV cannot get over past elections, just as you've accused me, Dennis. I'm actually embarrassed for you right now that you have a sitting senator here. Speaker 0: I'm sure you are. I have a border question and a follow-up for the final question here, but go ahead and continue. Speaker 2: I'm I'm done if you have no more questions. Okay. Speaker 0: Okay. I do wanna get your guys' opinion about the bipartisan border plan that got killed in the senate. Is it is it a regret on your part? What was wrong with that plan? Speaker 1: Well, I guess the best plan to deal with the border is the bill that came out of the house of representatives. The HR 2 came to the senate, and Chuck Schumer has it sitting there for 9 months. Won't bring it up hearings, won't bring it up for a vote. That's what we need to do. We need to attach that on the funding bill that is already passed because what we saw initially coming out of the Biden administration on this so called national security bill was more money for sanctuary cities, more money to make the to smooth the flow of illegal immigrants into the country rather than to stop the flood. And my goal is to stop this flood that's now at 9,000,000. And what's your proposal? Speaker 2: I've talked about you want me to talk about the the bill that went down? You talked about today. Speaker 0: You talked about ending catch and release, shutting down the border. You got it you got it. Speaker 2: I frankly don't think we need a lot of legislation. We do need, spending approved to finish president Trump's wall. And I'm not sure exactly the cost. It's I've heard it estimated between anywhere between 820,000,000,000. I think we need to get that spending approved and quickly build the border wall and allow our border patrol agents to do their job. We need to stop allowing people in. We need to have a president who will stop catch and release. You know, the senator talked about dozens upon dozens. Was it 90? Was it 90? Speaker 1: 94 different executive orders that Joe Biden signed in his first 100 days. Speaker 2: Dismantle an incredibly effective border policy that president Trump had in place to keep us safe, you safe, your viewers safe. This is somebody who's on a mission to destroy our country. Why would he do that? And look at the border. Lake Riley, 22 years old, her whole life ahead of her, is dead because of Joe Biden's policies. We've got fentanyl pouring in. So we don't have to create a whole bunch of legislation. Go back to president Trump's policies. They worked, and let's make sure we get that border wall complete. Speaker 0: Alright. Thank you very much. Speaker 2: Thank you. I sure hope that you can get your mind off the past, Dennis, just as you accuse me. Well, I'm just saying, Speaker 0: you still got lawsuits. Speaker 2: I do. And and and some of them yeah. You're right. And there's more lawsuits. The, America First Legal filed an incredible lawsuit up in the out of high county. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's because people are so well come up on that. And it's whether you like it or not part of your brand. Thank you very much. Appreciate that. Thank you, Randy. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you, Carrie. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 0: Yes. Appreciate Speaker 2: it. I hope you have more sense than some people. Usually, it's the cameraman who actually get it. Usually. That's why I married 1. Speaker 0: I'm I'm familiar with that. Yes.
shellenberger
Posted - April 8, 2024 at 1:03 PM
Saved - April 9, 2024 at 5:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk is facing a criminal investigation in Brazil for alleged disinformation and obstruction of justice. This event highlights the threat of totalitarianism and the importance of free speech. Social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook have faced pressure to censor content, while mainstream media spreads government propaganda. Governments worldwide are cracking down on free speech, and intelligence organizations are using NGOs to interfere in elections. The responsibility of protecting free speech should not rest solely on one individual like Musk. The rise of totalitarianism is alarming, and we must continue to fight for our rights.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Elon Musk Is All That Stands In The Way Of Totalitarianism Last night, around 8 p.m. local time in São Paulo, Brazil, Federal Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes announced a criminal investigation into Elon Musk, the owner of X, formerly known as Twitter, for allegedly spreading disinformation, obstructing justice, and allowing people who De Moraes had banned from social media to freely express their views. De Moraes said he would fine X twenty thousand dollars per day for every banned person Musk allows to speak. As such, De Moraes has taken Brazil one step closer to being a dictatorship. What’s more, the events of the last few weeks make clear that Elon Musk is the only thing standing in the way of global totalitarianism. Without free speech, there can be no democracy. If X goes down, we must continue to fight. We can continue to communicate through email and other social media platforms, such as Facebook. But email is no substitute for social media platforms' capacity to share information with millions of people. Mark Zuckerberg, the owner of Facebook, abandoned his principled free speech position in 2020 after three years of relentless pressure from activist NGOs, Democrats, and corporate advertisers. Today, Facebook actively represses the spread of news. The mainstream corporate news media have never been more corrupt and totalitarian. With few exceptions, they spread government propaganda as a matter of policy. Nobody demands censorship more than the corporate media, which benefit from governments shutting down their competitors. Governments are either not protecting free speech or actively participating in the war upon it. Last month, the US Supreme Court held a hearing where justices made clear that they were fine with the US government pressuring social media companies to censor. Last week, the Scottish government implemented a law to crack down on so-called hate speech, including jokes by comedians. In Ireland, the government wants the power to send police into people’s homes to search computers and phones for hate speech. In Canada, the governing Liberal party wants the power to send people to prison for life for things they’ve said. And the European Union has empowered a tiny group of bureaucrats to decide what is true and false and engage in mass censorship. All of this is happening at the very same moment that my colleagues and I have revealed that government intelligence organizations are working through NGOs to interfere in elections by spreading disinformation about populist activists and political candidates. In other words, governments are demanding censorship in order to protect their ability to spread disinformation. Making matters worse, governments are directly financing corporate news media. The current Brazilian government is spending 30 times more than the previous government on media advertising in order to spread its disinformation. I never in my life thought I would live to see the rise of totalitarianism in Western countries. A powerful minority of educated elites around the world are demanding the censorship, persecution, and incarceration of their political enemies. Naturally, they are doing so in the name of saving democracy. I am shocked and embarrassed that I used to call many of these totalitarians friends and allies. The only explanation is that they are in the grip of mass psychosis after years of media propaganda and government disinformation falsely claiming that populist political movements are undemocratic. The fact that the future of free speech rests upon the shoulders of a single individual is not something any of us should want. I do not think that this is a responsibility Elon Musk wants. He would be a far richer person had he never bought Twitter. He would also be living a more peaceful life. After Musk bought Twitter, the Biden administration and the Democratic Party declared war on him. Various government agencies filed multiple frivolous lawsuits against Musk and his companies in ways very similar to the war the Brazilian government is waging against X. What all of this reveals is that, until Musk bought Twitter, we didn’t really have freedom of expression. The US government felt that it controlled both the corporate news media and social media companies. We saw in the Twitter Files that the FBI orchestrated a disinformation and censorship campaign in order to protect Joe Biden. Starting with the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, operatives working for the US Department of Defense and the British Ministry of Defense sought to hide their censorship and disinformation efforts as “cyber security.” After that, the US Department of Homeland Security and the Stanford Internet Observatory engaged in a mass censorship effort around the 2020 elections and Covid. It is today clear that intelligence and security agencies have been working together around the world to gain control over social media platforms in order to discredit, prosecute, and incarcerate populist leaders. The evidence is now overwhelming that the FBI and Secret Service are covering up evidence related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot in Washington DC. And there is still much we do not know about the eerily similar riot in Brazil’s capitol on January 8, 2023. There is much we need to do to fight back....

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk is under criminal investigation in Brazil for alleged disinformation on social media. The threat to free speech is highlighted, with concerns about censorship by governments and social media platforms. The rise of totalitarianism in Western countries is discussed, along with the role of intelligence agencies in spreading disinformation. Musk's purchase of Twitter is seen as a turning point for freedom of expression. The FBI's involvement in censoring information related to political events is also mentioned. The need to fight back against censorship and government control of social media is emphasized.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Michael Shellenberger reporting from Sao Paulo, Brazil. Last night around 8 PM local time, federal supreme court justice Alejandro de Mourais announced a criminal investigation into Elon Musk, the owner of X, formerly known as Twitter, for allegedly spreading disinformation, obstructing justice, and allowing people who Jim Mordice had banned from social media to freely express their views. Jim Mordice said he would fine x $20,000 per day for every banned person who Musk allows to speak. SHG Mordais has taken Brazil one step closer to being a dictatorship. What's more, the events of the last few weeks make clear that Elon Musk is the only thing standing in the way of global totalitarianism. Without free speech, there can be no democracy. If x goes down, we must continue to fight. We can continue to communicate through email and other social media platforms such as Facebook. But email is no substitute for the capacity of social media platforms to share information instantaneously with millions of people. And Mark Zuckerberg, the owner of Facebook, abandoned his principled free speech position in 2020 after 3 years of relentless pressure from activist NGOs and corporate advertisers. Today, Facebook actively represses the spread of news. As for the mainstream corporate news media, it's never been more corrupt and totalitarian. With few exceptions, the corporate news media spread disinformation and government propaganda as a matter of policy. And nobody demands censorship more than the corporate news media, which benefit directly from governments shutting down their competitors. Governments are either not protecting free speech or actively participating in the war upon it. Last month, the US Supreme Court held a hearing where the justices made clear that they were fine with the US government pressuring social media companies to censor. Last week, the Scottish government implemented a law to crack down on so called hate speech, including jokes by comedians. In Ireland, the government wants the power to send police into people's homes to search computers and phones for so called hate speech. In Canada, the governing Liberal Party wants the power to send people to prison for life for things they've said. And the European Union has empowered a tiny group of bureaucrats to decide what is true and false and engage in mass censorship. All of this is happening at the very same moment that that my colleagues and I have revealed that government intelligence organizations are working through NGOs to interfere in elections by spreading disinformation about populist activists and political candidates. In other words, governments are demanding censorship in order to protect their ability to spread disinformation. Making matters worse, governments are directly financing corporate news media. The current Brazilian government is spending 30 times more than the previous government on media advertising in order to spread its disinformation. I never in my life thought I would live to see the rise of totalitarianism in Western countries. A powerful minority of educated elites around the world are demanding the censorship, persecution, and even incarceration of their political enemies. Naturally, they're doing so in the name of saving democracy. I am shocked and embarrassed that I used to call many of these totalitarians my friends and allies. The only explanation is that they're in the grip of mass psychosis after years of media propaganda and government disinformation falsely claiming that populist political movements are undemocratic and a threat to democracy. The fact that the future of free speech rests upon the shoulders of a single individual is not something any of us should want. I do not think that this is a responsibility Elon Musk wants. He would be a far richer person had he never bought Twitter. He would also be living a far more peaceful life. After Musk bought Twitter, the Biden administration and the Democratic Party declared war on him and his companies. Various government agencies filed multiple frivolous lawsuits against him and his companies in ways very similar to the war that the Brazilian government is waging against X. What all of this reveals is that until Musk had bought Twitter, we really didn't have freedom of expression. The US government felt that it controlled both the corporate news media and social media companies. We saw on the Twitter files that the FBI orchestrated a disinformation and censorship campaign in order to protect Joe Biden. Starting with the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, operatives working for the US Department of Defense and the British Ministry of Defense start to hide their censorship and their disinformation efforts as cybersecurity. After that, the US Department of Homeland Security and the Stanford Internet Observatory engaged in a mass censorship effort around the 2020 elections and COVID. It is today clear that the intelligence and security agencies have been working together around the world to gain control over social media platforms in order to discredit, prosecute, and even incarcerate populous leaders. The evidence is now overwhelming that the FBI and Secret Service are covering up evidence related to the January 6, 2021 capital riot in Washington DC. And there's still much we do not know about the eerily similar riot in Brazil's capital on January 8, 2020 22. There's much we need to do to fight back. 1st,
elonmusk
Posted - July 14, 2024 at 9:41 PM
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 1:28 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The legacy media is a pure propaganda machine. 𝕏 is the voice of the people.

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

Share 𝕏.com links with your friends who still believe the legacy media. https://t.co/tWs9jIzW2y

goddeketal
Posted - July 15, 2024 at 12:58 AM
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 1:58 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

The mainstream media is complicit! https://t.co/U2D3fX4xMa

elonmusk
Posted - August 21, 2024 at 12:59 PM
Saved - August 21, 2024 at 1:15 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Wow

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

Legacy media is biased and wants to control what you know, which is why citizen journalism is essential. https://t.co/S33NO5vhhD

elonmusk
Posted - September 15, 2024 at 4:39 AM
Saved - September 15, 2024 at 3:26 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The media is a Democrat propaganda machine https://t.co/JPpn34jEhh

shellenberger
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 4:19 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 12:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The media's push for more government power to combat misinformation threatens free speech and reveals their desire for censorship, especially after Elon Musk's Twitter acquisition. Countries like Brazil, Canada, and Australia exemplify this trend, seeking to control social media for propaganda. Trust in institutions is eroding due to their failures, and reform or replacement is necessary. The next president must appoint trustworthy leaders in intelligence agencies who support transparency and accountability. A truth-and-reconciliation approach could help restore public trust in government.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The media say we must give the government more power to fight misinformation online. We must not. The only way to fight misinformation is through free speech. What the media really want is the power to censor us. And it's easy to see why: very few Americans trust them. https://t.co/lcC27AcQcL

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

For years, governments and mainstream media corporations worked hand-in-glove to censor social media platforms. After @elonmusk bought Twitter, that changed. Ever since, they've been on the warpath, demanding the power to censor X and demonizing the First Amendment. https://t.co/mbKb9uSbkm

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Brazil, Canada, and Australia show where this is all headed. They are working to shake down social media platforms to pay off mainstream media they control. It's censorship in service of propaganda. Their goal is total control over the information environment

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The media need censorship to maintain their news monopoly. Their brainwashing worked on Democrats from 2016 - 2020. But Democrats' trust has dropped 16 points since 2022. Years of media gaslighting on Covid, Russia, inflation, migration, Biden, laptop, etc. is now backfiring. https://t.co/zpbs9gQWXI

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Trust is declining because our institutions are doing the opposite of their purpose. The media is spreading propaganda and demanding censorship. The FBI, CIA, and DHS are committing crimes. Pediatricians are hurting kids. Universities are silencing scholars.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The bad news is that these trends spell civilizational death. Healthy nations need trustworthy journalists, intelligence and security agencies, pediatricians, and universities. That means there are two options: those institutions must either be reformed or replaced.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Everybody can see the destiny of the mainstream corporate media. Declining Americans trust it and are turning to alternative sources, which is a healthy response. Universities, pediatricians, etc are controlled by trustees and members who can take control or exit and compete.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The next president must replace the heads of our intelligence and security agencies with people who large majorities of the public and both Republicans and Democrats in Congress can trust to be politically neutral and competent.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The new heads of those agencies must publicly proclaim their political neutrality, their cooperation with an independent Blue Ribbon investigation of abuses of power in their agencies, and support the disclosure of state secrets: https://t.co/VIUnWKHMNE

@ScottAdamsSays - Scott Adams

The list of things we are not allowed to know is growing daily. Epstein list Diddy tapes Harris 60 Minutes full video FBI attendees at Jan6 Who owned the coke at the White House UFO stuff JFK assassination files Crooks phone encrypted apps Routh phones What am I leaving off?

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

For such a sweeping investigation and house cleaning to occur, it may need to be a truth and reconciliation-style disclosure, with amnesty granted to lawbreakers. Without that, it's hard to see, from a practical perspective, how significant amounts of disclosure could occur.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The obvious objection to doing so is that it would only further destroy the public's faith in government. If people don't trust the federal government already, why would they become more trusting after they learn of its very many and very ugly abuses of power? https://t.co/DOT5ou8BmX

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The answer is to restore trust. Disclosure and transparency are how the new heads of US intelligence and security agencies win the public's trust. Congress should itself commit publicly to truth-and-reconciliation and demand the same from the new heads of those agencies.

elonmusk
Posted - October 21, 2024 at 12:59 AM
Saved - October 21, 2024 at 7:39 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The legacy media is pure left-wing propaganda

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Soros buys 220 radio stations before the election, gets fast-tracked by the FCC Media: 😴😴This is fine😴😴 Elon Musk gets voters to sign a petition Media: 😡😡JAIL HIM😡😡

JustXAshton
Posted - November 13, 2024 at 3:33 AM
Saved - November 13, 2024 at 10:09 AM

@JustXAshton - Ashton Forbes

“We basically are scribes taking dictation from the right hand of the king. The fourth estate is dead.” Mainstream media is a CIA corrupted institution. https://t.co/7y46Z5rFQb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CIA has admitted to having operatives embedded in major media outlets to influence stories for their benefit. Reports indicate that they have relationships with reporters from various national news organizations, persuading them to alter or withhold stories that could threaten national security. Evidence from the Pike Committee revealed that 42 CIA employees were placed in key media centers, often as national security reporters. A Time Life board member remarked that journalists are merely taking dictation from powerful entities, indicating a loss of journalistic integrity. Some reporters have shared experiences of their stories being spiked by editors, and payments to these operatives were made discreetly, often without proper reporting to tax authorities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this officially was released by the CIA, talking about how they have people embedded in all the major media to change, alter, and affect stories to their benefit. Speaker 1: You are fake news. Speaker 2: So every news, agency, every television radio station in the Albuquerque or Santa Fe area had our snitches in there. So we knew, and we paid them. We paid them good money. One of the good one of the reasons you get to people was you pay them. And, and that was controversial. That that was somewhat controversial. Speaker 0: Do you know of national media that have had some Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. Yeah. I'm not gonna name them. Speaker 0: We now have relationship with reporters from every underlined major wire service, newspaper, newsweekly, and television network in the nation. In many instances, we have persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized our sources and methods. And it goes on to then say that they have the same within academic circles. Speaker 1: There's a a finding that the the Pike Committee made that they they had verified 42 full time central intelligence agency paid employees that were inserted inside the major national news media centers. And most of them ended up being the so called national security reporters. Speaker 0: The man turned to me, and this is a board member of Time Life, and said, doctor Grier, we basically are scribes taking dictation from the right hand of the king. The 4th estate is dead. Speaker 1: I know reporters for Time Magazine who told me specifically that they've provided the stories and their editors have spiked them. Speaker 2: Yeah. The high level producers and directors. Yeah. Speaker 0: And were they how are they paid for the Cash. Speaker 2: Yeah. You pay What you do is you make them sign a form and you tell them, you gotta report this IRS. But whether they do it or not, you you know, you're you're not gonna give your form to IRS. I paid I paid, better not say. There were some of them are large.
cb_doge
Posted - December 9, 2024 at 4:55 AM
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 4:31 PM

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

Remember when media outlets got caught using the same script? It’s a clear sign they’re controlled by the same people. Share this with anyone who believes everything they see on the news, and remind them: legacy media is nothing more than a propaganda machine. https://t.co/pSwFhNvtr2

ksorbs
Posted - December 10, 2024 at 6:19 AM
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 1:00 PM

@ksorbs - Kevin Sorbo

The media is the enemy of the people. https://t.co/at9Dxs2YlT

MauriceMur4768
Posted - January 16, 2025 at 1:35 PM
Saved - January 16, 2025 at 3:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe mainstream media today engages in more gaslighting for the government than in the past. Elites and legacy media have long manipulated public opinion through propaganda, often with minimal scrutiny compared to grassroots misinformation. Historical examples, like Operation Mockingbird and the Iraq War, illustrate how media can amplify false narratives. The profit-driven model prioritizes sensationalism, allowing elites to control narratives and suppress dissent. This results in a polarized public, where misinformation thrives and corrections rarely reach the same audience.

@MauriceMur4768 - Maurice Murphy 1215

The mainstream media today does more gaslighting for the government then the Victorians ever had The Pervasive Propaganda of Elites and Legacy Media Media outlets and elites have long been significant purveyors of propaganda and misinformation, using their vast resources and centralized control to shape public opinion for political, economic, and social agendas. While grassroots misinformation often faces scrutiny, elite-driven narratives operate on a much larger scale, with far greater impact. Governments and elites have exploited media to influence public perception. During the Cold War, the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird embedded pro-American propaganda in major news outlets. Similarly, during the Iraq War, media amplified false claims about weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), garnering support for an invasion based on fabricated evidence. Even in democracies, elites use regulatory pressure or economic power to shape media coverage, suppress dissent, and align narratives with Modern media’s profit-driven model prioritizes sensationalism and engagement over accuracy. Dependence on advertising revenue gives corporate sponsors undue influence, discouraging critical reporting that could threaten elite interests. This relationship perpetuates narratives that reinforce the status quo, sidelining stories that challenge powerful institutions. Elites excel at controlling narratives through selective framing, often omitting key facts to present skewed interpretations. As outlined in Chomsky and Herman’s Manufacturing Consent, this ensures the public consumes stories that align with dominant ideologies, while alternative perspectives are systematically excluded. Legacy media’s vast infrastructure allows it to amplify misinformation on a global scale. Unlike grassroots sources, elite-driven narratives reach millions through coordinated messaging across print, broadcast, and digital platforms. Repetition makes these narratives appear credible, significantly shaping public opinion. Partisan media deepens polarization by catering to ideological audiences and reinforcing biases. False equivalence in mainstream reporting also misleads the public, giving undue attention to fringe perspectives while distorting the weight of evidence. Elite-driven misinformation often faces minimal consequences. Corrections, when issued, rarely reach the same audience as the original falsehoods. Instead, legacy media frequently deflects blame onto grassroots sources, ignoring its own significant role in shaping flawed narratives. The Iraq War is a stark example of elite-driven propaganda, where false WMD claims went unchallenged, leading to widespread public support for an unjustified invasion. Similarly, during the 2008 financial crisis, media failed to scrutinize risky financial practices, protecting Wall Street interests. More recently, conflicting COVID-19 narratives have shown how even reputable outlets can contribute to public confusion through negligence or framing.

DonaldJTrumpJr
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 4:50 PM

@DonaldJTrumpJr - Donald Trump Jr.

The media was paid by USAID (essentially Biden) to attack all of us. This means they were never media in the first place they were simply state sponsored media all along.

@chrispavlovski - Chris Pavlovski 🏴‍☠️

USAID funding corporate media is the biggest scandal of 2025. In essence, the Biden administration was paying the media through USAID to attack the likes of Rumble and X, advocate for censorship, and install their own government in the USA by attacking the opposition party.

elonmusk
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 5:34 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Absolutely. We still haven’t discovered just how much the media was paid and controlled by the government, but we will.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

They said the government was by and for the people, and the media was free. They weren't. Deep state actors controlled them. Then, after the populist revolts of 2016, they turned the tools of regime change, including disinfo, censorship, and lawfare, against the American people. https://t.co/Em0dnauRNn

Video Transcript AI Summary
After the war on terror, counterterrorism and counterinsurgency tactics were turned against the American people following the 2016 populist revolutions. We saw the Russiagate conspiracy and efforts to censor conflicting opinions, mirroring tactics used abroad for regime change. The Hunter Biden laptop situation exemplifies proactive influence operations and the intelligence community's mobilization. USAID has been taking over independent investigative journalism in Europe and worldwide to control information. A CIA analyst's whistleblower complaint, which led to the Trump impeachment, relied on evidence from the USAID-funded OCCRP. USAID views information control holistically. The FBI weaponized the Aspen Institute to manipulate the perception of the Hunter Biden laptop. USAID is also training NGOs to demand censorship.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You say in your testimony, psyop tactics being used by The US and UK military against the American people. That is really scary stuff reading that. Could you elaborate? Speaker 1: Because I think Speaker 0: the American people need to hear I mean, they need to hear about this. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, we now know what happened, which is that basically after the war on terror, the United States used counterterrorism, counterinsurgency, counter populism tactics first in the Middle East as part of the Arab Spring uprisings, then in the Eastern Europe as part of the color revolutions, using social media to foment revolutions against places that we wanted regime change, and then using censorship in places to repress conflicting opinion in places that we were trying to stabilize. Those tactics were then turned against the American people after the populist revolutions of twenty sixteen. First, you saw Russiagate, the the idea this wild conspiracy theory that president Trump was somehow controlled through a sex blackmail operation by the Russians. But then we also saw, manipulate you know, a very elaborate effort to do exactly what they had done abroad, creating small committees of experts to decide what the truth was and demand censorship on the basis of it. But I also mentioned there's also these proactive influence operations, the most dramatic of which is the Hunter Biden laptop, severely illegal, but we also saw in the mobilization of the intelligence community. And now in the latest study article that we published today, we have documented that the Agency for International Development has overseen basically a takeover over the last decade and a half of independent investigative journalism in Europe and around the world through OCCRP and supposedly independent journalism organizations with an eye to basically controlling the information and controlling the major news media that do investigative journalism. You, mister chairman. And mister chairman, thank you so much for the work that you Speaker 0: have done over the last couple of congresses on this issue. Speaker 2: Mister Shellenberger, can you explain how you traced USAID funding that served as the basis for whistleblower report in 2019, which led to the impeachment of president Trump. Speaker 1: Sure. Well, you may remember that the, the so called whistleblowers in the White House was actually a CIA analyst. And in that whistleblower's complaint, which led to the impeachment, one of the central pieces of evidence was created by a USAID funded and controlled organization called the OCCRP. And we have another piece out today about how it participated in the Russiagate hoax as well, creating, essentially, very important information leading to that. So, I mean, you have in USAID a much larger fund of money and a much broader strategy for information control that included censorship, but also, as I mentioned, taking control of investigative journalism, really worldwide. I mean, its ambitions were, you know, amazing. So, yeah, I mean, that's a that's an agency when when we saw that get shut down by Doge, I thought that was completely appropriate. If there's something in there that it was doing that's valuable, then you could refund it later. But my view, same thing with CISA, death penalty for organizations that participated in violations of the first amendment like CISA. Cybersecurity is an extremely important function. It shouldn't be contaminated and and undermined by censorship activities. Speaker 2: I think it's always been known that our government has funded the change in administrations, if we can say it politely, of other governments. But isn't it borderline treason when the taxpayer is when when organizations entrusted with protecting our country are now undermining our own government? Absolutely. Speaker 1: I mean, if you're trying to do regime change, illegal if you're weaponizing DHS, FBI, CISA, that's that's treasonous regime change activities redirected, you know, that you developed abroad, that we developed abroad for regime change directed against the American people and the and our representatives. I mean, it's shocking, and we still haven't dealt with it as a country. Speaker 3: Mister Shellenberger, you mentioned that USAID, which has been in the news of late, spending, taxpayer money and all kinds of stupid things, is also involved in the censorship effort. I want you to just elaborate on that a little bit because this is going on as we speak. I want you to elaborate on that for the committee, if you would. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I think it's important to understand that USAID viewed this very holistically. And it's important that if you look at the Hunter Biden laptop case, which is an extremely important case to understand because the FBI was weaponized, then it weaponized the Aspen Institute to brainwash the entire media, It wasn't just that they censored it. It was that they changed the perception of the laptop. They they they they created the perception that it was something other than what it obviously was. And that's what these guys are trying to do. These are called information operations, and USAID has been in the process of taking over so called independent investigative journalism around the world, and at the same time then, training NGOs how to demand censorship. For example, mister Aaron's organization has been working to train organizations to so called flag misinformation behind the scenes. By the way, it's one thing to criticize somebody publicly, which we should all be engaged in. Yeah. This thing where you're skulking around You do that all Speaker 3: the time. Speaker 1: Secretly yeah. That's that's what Open Democracy is. This thing of going out and, like, secretly flagging information behind the scenes and demanding censorship, that is such a that's completely an abomination. That is not what Speaker 3: It's hard to be clear. You you're saying USAID, your investigation, is now engaged in this prebunking kind of concept and and and process that they did with the laptop story in the fall of twenty twenty. Speaker 1: And it's the exact same approach as well, where often what they're doing, for example, with USAID, OCCRP is that they're they're leaking intelligence from the intelligence agencies, in a very and not like WikiLeaks where they just dumped it, I think, probably too much without without the proper redactions, but they're strategically leaking it and then manipulating places like The Guardian and The New York Times to publish certain stories and control the whole investigative news process. Speaker 3: And we saw this from from Yulrof's testimony. He testified during these weekly meetings that they communicate federal law enforcement communicated to us there was gonna be hack and leak operations Before the presidential election, likely in in October, we had these repeat so that what's gonna happen, when it's gonna happen, and then they said here who it's gonna involve, that there were rumors that the hack and leak operation would involve Hunter Biden. So they set them all up. And then The reason why them they set them all up because they had the laptop. They knew what was coming. And when it happens, everyone buys into what the 51 former intel officials say.
MatrixMysteries
Posted - July 14, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Saved - August 26, 2025 at 5:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tradition is under attack by industries that benefit from our disconnection and dissatisfaction. Feminism is said to have undermined chivalry, leading to a competitive landscape where average individuals struggle for connection. Masculinity has been redefined as toxic, weakening societal structures. Identity politics create division, while the celebration of unhealthy lifestyles distracts from real issues. Climate change narratives serve economic interests, and Big Pharma profits from managing rather than curing illness. Education and media perpetuate control, shaping perceptions rather than informing.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

“Tradition didn’t die. It was murdered—by industries that profit from you staying sick, single, and spiritually lost.” – G.K. Chesterton A Thread Exposing the Weaponized Lies and Propaganda We’ve Been Sold🧵 1. Feminism Killed Chivalry https://t.co/QX4Rq00nN1

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

Chivalry Is Dead, and Women Killed It 🔹 Feminism told women they didn’t need men. Social media showed them they could replace them. The sexual marketplace went global overnight. Average women now compete for the top 10% of men, and average men get left behind. Chivalry didn’t stand a chance — you can’t open doors in a world that values status over substance. 🔹 It wasn’t about equality. It was about exposure. Social media gave women unlimited options and men unlimited rejection. The result wasn’t liberation. It was inflation — of egos, expectations, and loneliness.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Do we need men? No. No? We don't need short men. Oh god. Do we need men to make us stupid? Do women need men in this world? Do we need men? We can be strong independent women. Nobody needs men. Really? We do not need men. Why not? Why do we need men? We don't want men. Why? Yeah. You do need women. Because they're beautiful. Women make us feel compassionate and affectionate. Do we need women? Of course, we do. Do we need women? Yes. Why? Because they're hot. I mean, shit. Unless you're gay. Who's gonna do my dishes?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Need men? Speaker 1: What the fuck? Speaker 0: Do we need men? No. Speaker 1: Do we need men? No. No? We don't need short men. Speaker 0: Do you need a man? No. Need a man? Speaker 1: Oh god. Speaker 0: Do you need a man? Speaker 1: No. Do Speaker 0: we need men? No. Why? Speaker 1: I don't know. Speaker 0: Do we need men? No. No? Do we need men? Speaker 1: Do we need men to make us stupid? Speaker 0: Do we need men? Do we need men? Do women need men in this world? Do we need men? Speaker 1: I don't know. Why? Because Speaker 0: we can be strong independent women. Do we need men? Speaker 1: Not necessarily, but, like, if I can look at them, like, we need a man to look at. Do we need men? Speaker 0: No. Why? Nobody needs men. Really? We Speaker 1: do not Speaker 0: need men. Speaker 1: Why not? Why do we need men? We don't want men. Why why would I need men? Speaker 0: So what do you Speaker 1: what what can you get Speaker 0: from someone else that you don't get from a man? Speaker 1: The only thing I can Speaker 0: get from a man that Speaker 1: I can't get anyone else anywhere else is Okay. Speaker 0: And I don't need Do we need women? Yes. Speaker 1: I'm doing. Why? These women Speaker 0: are awesome. Do we need women? Of course. Speaker 1: Why? Yeah. You do need women. Because they're beautiful. Speaker 0: Do we need women? Speaker 1: Women make us feel compassionate and affectionate. Do we need women? Of course, we do. Speaker 0: Do we need women? Yes. Why? Because they're hot. And what else? They're hot. Do we need women? Speaker 1: I mean, shit. Unless you're gay. Speaker 0: Do we need women? Speaker 1: Do we need women? Yeah. Yes. Who's gonna do my dishes?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Men don't have a say in women's sex life. Do you think the sexual empowerment of women in any way contributes to their own objectification? No. Does the fact does the fact that porn and OnlyFans exist prove that women are okay being objectified as long as they're getting paid. No. It means that we can use our body the way that we want to without men's control. Do you consider sex work to be real work? Yes. Yes. And if you don't, you suck. Why are women more accepting of women who can sell sex but are less likely to accept a man who can buy it? Because it's empowering to be able to do what you want with your body when you want to be able to do it. Because it's my fucking body. Body mind choice. My body
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Men don't have a say in women's sex life. Speaker 1: Do you think the sexual empowerment of women in any way contributes to their own objectification? No. Does the fact does the fact that porn and OnlyFans exist prove that women are okay being objectified as long as they're getting paid. Speaker 0: No. It means that we can use our body the way that we want to without men's control. Speaker 1: Do you consider sex work to be real work? Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. And if you don't, you suck. Speaker 1: Why are women more accepting of women who can sell sex but are less likely to accept a man who can buy it? Speaker 0: Because it's empowering to be able to do what you want with your body when you want to be able to do it. Speaker 1: But isn't that like shaming your own customers? No. Well, how can you be a victim of your own product? Speaker 0: Because it's my fucking body. Body mind choice. My body

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

2. The War on Masculinity 🔹 Strength was never the threat — but strong men were. So masculinity was rebranded as toxic, fatherhood as optional, and leadership as oppression. Boys were medicated. Men were silenced. And the world was told to celebrate their absence. 🔹 A society without strong men is easier to steer. Masculinity had to be dismantled — not for equality, but for compliance. When protectors fall, predators thrive. And in the vacuum, the state becomes father, protector, and god.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Normalized guys wearing nail polish, crop tops, honestly, any clothes they want, dresses, skirts, whatever. Speaker 1: Life's too short to exercise. I'm just gonna be honest. There are so many better things to do than exercise. And this way of thinking is known as fatphobia. Speaker 2: A fat fucking den. Speaker 1: Men are not meant to be dominant. Men are meant to be submissive. Speaker 2: At nighttime, that hurt. You know? Speaker 1: And I think that just that flipped the switch in me where I was like, okay, fuck you. Watch this.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Normalized guys wearing nail polish, crop tops, honestly, any clothes they want, dresses, skirts, whatever. Speaker 1: Life's too short to exercise. I'm just gonna be honest. There are so many better things to do than exercise. And this way of thinking is known as fatphobia. Speaker 2: A fat fucking den. Speaker 1: Men are not meant to be dominant. Men are meant to be submissive. Speaker 2: At nighttime, that hurt. You know? Speaker 1: And I think that just that flipped the switch in me where I was like, okay, fuck you. Watch this.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

3. The Fragmentation of Identity 🔹 Identity politics replaced unity with division — turning shared humanity into niche categories. You were taught to see yourself through race, gender, and labels before seeing yourself as a person. Victimhood became currency. And the more fragmented you became, the more powerful the system grew. 🔹 This wasn’t empowerment. It was distraction. While people fought over pronouns and flags, real power structures stayed untouched. Confusion became control. The more lost you are, the easier you are to lead — and the harder you are to rebuild.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We know he's good, God, and he no longer could be here. We honor his legacy. We're not briating it, God. We're not shaming anybody, God. We're just humbling ourselves before you. Yes, Lord. You brought the thunder and rain today, God.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We know he's good, God, and he no longer could be here. We honor his legacy. We're not briating it, God. We're not shaming anybody, God. We're just humbling ourselves before you. Yes, Lord. You brought the thunder and rain today, God.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

4. The Celebration of Obesity 🔹 What began as body acceptance became a shield for dysfunction. Health was framed as vanity. Discipline as oppression. Gluttony was rebranded as empowerment. And anyone who promoted self-control was labeled a threat to progress. 🔹 This wasn’t compassion. It was control. A population that normalizes illness is easier to pacify, easier to profit from, and easier to keep numb. The food stays poisoned. The body stays broken. And the lie is sold as self-love — because truth doesn’t sell nearly as well.

Video Transcript AI Summary
- What I'm hearing is this intense discussion around self hatred and when you're in a bigger body. - I wanted to ask you, your you who's 20, is your life better? Are you happier? Is everything better now that you're slightly smaller than you were before? - Absolutely. And I'm not a little bit smaller. I'm a lot smaller. I did do research into everything. - I can still have kids, and that may not have happened if I had to stay the size I was. - My question to you is, can you honestly say that you are a 100% happy and healthy? Like, you have no medical conditions whatsoever. You have no problems at all with your health. - I think it's really interesting that I feel like I need to justify my existence in this room. - No. You asked her to justify her decision. I said she was happy. - I didn't ask her to justify what her health issues now or if there is any. - But have you got any health issues? No.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I'm hearing is this intense discussion around self hatred and when you're in a bigger body. And I wanted to ask people down the front there, your you who's 20, is your life better? Are you happier? Is is everything better now that you're slightly smaller than you were before? Speaker 1: Absolutely. And I'm not a little bit smaller. I'm a lot smaller. I did do research into everything. I can still have kids, and that may not have happened if I had to stay the size I was. My question to you is, can you honestly say that you are a 100% happy and healthy? Like, you have no medical conditions whatsoever. You have no problems at all with your health. Speaker 0: I think it's really interesting that I feel like I need to justify my existence in this room. No. But hang on a minute. You asked her to justify her decision. I said she was happy. I didn't ask her to justify what her health issues now or if there is any. Speaker 1: But have you got any health issues? No.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Just because I'm fat, that doesn't invalidate the things that I say. "She died." The statement is followed by a provocative prompt: "You ready to get super sized?" "She died too." The sequence continues with a shift in tone: "Today, I've got the big Fruit Loops." "He's dead." The closer invites listeners: "Join me on my fat positive radio show, which didn't last long because she died."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just because I'm fat, that doesn't invalidate the things that I say. She died. You ready to get super sized? She died too. Today, I've got the big Fruit Loops. He's dead. Join me on my fat positive radio show, which didn't last long because she died.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

5. The Hoax of Climate Change 🔹 Climate change isn’t a crisis — it’s a business model. The narrative was weaponized to sell carbon credits, impose green taxes, and push endless “solutions” that enrich the few while burdening the many. 🔹 Behind every doomsday headline is a motive — political, economic, or both. The goal was never to save the planet. It was to sell fear, restrict freedom, and manufacture obedience under the guise of moral responsibility.

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's not science. It's politics. I've been listening to this bullshit for fifty years. In the sixties, it was oil will be gone in ten years. In the seventies, it was another ice age in ten years. In the eighties, it was acid rain will destroy all the crops in ten years. In the nineties, it was the ozone layer will be destroyed in ten years. In the February, it was the glaciers will all melt in ten years. In the twenty tens, it was the East And West Coast will be underwater from rising sea levels in ten years. None of this fear mongering nonsense came true, but it did result in higher taxes every time.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not science. It's politics. I've been listening to this bullshit for fifty years. In the sixties, it was oil will be gone in ten years. In the seventies, it was another ice age in ten years. In the eighties, it was acid rain will destroy all the crops in ten years. In the nineties, it was the ozone layer will be destroyed in ten years. In the February, it was the glaciers will all melt in ten years. In the twenty tens, it was the East And West Coast will be underwater from rising sea levels in ten years. None of this fear mongering nonsense came true, but it did result in higher taxes every time.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

6. The Business Of Big Pharma — “A Patient Cured Is a Customer Lost” 🔹 The pharmaceutical industry isn’t built to cure disease — it’s built to monetize it. Real healing ends the cycle of profit, so treatments are designed to manage symptoms, not eliminate them. 🔹 Natural remedies and root-cause solutions are dismissed, discredited, or banned — not because they fail, but because they can't be patented. The goal was never your health. It was lifelong dependency — and it's worth billions.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I don't know what happened in 1990. There was no plague that was killing children that we had tripled the amount of vaccines." "Happened after 1989? The vaccine schedule. Born to 26 more vaccines. Agreed. Are all of them absolutely necessary?" "They wanna make money." "It's twice as many as anywhere else in 30 countries in the Western world. But We give twice as many shots as any of those countries." "Should you educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life?" "I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know what happened in 1990. There was no plague that was killing children that we had tripled the amount of vaccines. Speaker 1: Happened after 1989? The vaccine schedule. Born to 26 more vaccines. Agreed. Are all of them absolutely necessary? They wanna make money. Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 1: It's twice as many as anywhere else in in 30 countries in the Western world. But We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that? Well, what what are you against? Don't vaccinate for this, but vaccinate for that? Yes. I think we have to choose which is absolutely necessary. Speaker 0: Should you should educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life? Speaker 1: I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time. Excellent. Parents have to take have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. They have to look at the information. Speaker 0: Space out the vaccines. Delay them till after one. Clean out the toxins that are in them. We don't need that many. Speaker 1: Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save that could save a life or prevent a disease? I don't I don't understand. I The AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical schools are financed by the drug companies. This is a huge business. Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13,000,000,000 Speaker 0: They control medical schools. Speaker 1: What we are asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
Video Transcript AI Summary
'The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel's drugs and keep taking them over and over.' This describes a movie concept in which cartels unite to control media and politicians to force global lockdowns via drug dependence. 'I threw the script away.' 'I mean, who is gonna believe that crazy idea?' The speaker presents this premise as the movie concept, followed by remarks. The remarks reflect the speaker's reaction.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So the movie goes like this. The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel's drugs and keep taking them over and over. I threw the script away. I mean, who is gonna believe that crazy idea?

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

7. The Illusion of Sexual Liberation 🔹 They told you it was natural, healthy, even empowering — a safe outlet in a digital world. But porn didn’t liberate desire. It hijacked it. It rewired your brain, numbed your instincts, and trained you to crave pixels over people. 🔹 This wasn’t about freedom. It was about control. A distracted, desensitized population doesn’t build families, lead communities, or challenge systems. Porn was never just a product — it was a weapon. And it’s being used on you.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

8. School: Still Running on the same 100-Year-Old Blueprint 🔹 School was designed for efficiency, not growth. A system built to mass-produce workers — not develop minds. Bells told you when to move. Desks told you where to sit. Silence was rewarded. Questions were discouraged. It wasn’t education. It was conditioning. 🔹 Real-world skills were replaced with memorized facts. Creativity was punished. Curiosity was standardized. You weren’t educated — you were processed. And the system worked exactly as intended: it prepared you for a job, not a life.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I did some investigation into the derivation of the American public education system and found out that it was based on the Prussian model. And the Prussians produced a universal education system in the late eighteen hundreds because they were afraid they were losing military superiority, and they wanted to produce a cadre of mindless obedient soldiers. That was expressly the purpose. And then that model was adopted by prototypical fascists in The US, again in the late eighteen hundreds. This is before Mussolini and all of that time. Corporate types mostly who wanted to produce cadres of obedient workers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I did some investigation into the derivation of the American public education system and found out that it was based on the Prussian model. And the Prussians produced a universal education system in the late eighteen hundreds because they were afraid they were losing military superiority, and they wanted to produce a cadre of mindless obedient soldiers. That was expressly the purpose. And then that model was adopted by prototypical fascists in The US, again in the late eighteen hundreds. This is before Mussolini and all of that time. Corporate types mostly who wanted to produce cadres of obedient workers. And that's why the desks are in rows, and that's why there's factory bells, and that's why it's top down leadership. What was really stunning about that wasn't only that that was the model, but it's it's worse than that because the people who built the schools were consciously aiming at eradicating the will of the students who were part of the system because they wanted them to be obedient.
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a lot of people that think that because they're bad at school or because they're not interested in school that they're destined to be a loser. And that's not true. The problem with school is too rigid. Like, public school system sit down, under employed underpaid teacher, disinterested, not really connected with the work. You're not connected with it. You just can't wait to go home and do what you like to do. Exactly. And you get this thought in your head like, oh my god. I'm gonna be a loser. I mean, that's how I was when I was in high school. I thought I was gonna be a loser.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a lot of people that think that because they're bad at school or because they're not interested in school that they're destined to be a loser. Yeah. And that's not true. You you can the problem with school is too rigid. Like, public school system sit down, under employed underpaid teacher, disinterested, not really connected with the work. You're not connected with it. You just can't wait to go home and do what you like to do. Exactly. And you get this thought in your head like, oh my god. I'm gonna be a loser. I mean, that's how I was when I was in high school. I thought I was gonna be a loser.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

9. The Mainstream Media Propaganda Machine 🔹 The mainstream media doesn’t report news — it manufactures consent. Owned by a handful of corporations, it doesn’t inform the public. It shapes perception to serve power. 🔹 Stories are framed, facts are filtered, and dissenting voices are erased. The goal isn’t to keep you informed — it’s to keep you aligned. Not with the truth, but with the approved version of it.

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

Thanks for reading. If you found value in this thread, retweet the first post and follow for more: @MatrixMysteries Want deeper dives and exclusive content? Consider Subscribing — more truths, fewer filters. https://t.co/Jn3EWqBufH

@MatrixMysteries - MatrixMysteries

“Tradition didn’t die. It was murdered—by industries that profit from you staying sick, single, and spiritually lost.” – G.K. Chesterton A Thread Exposing the Weaponized Lies and Propaganda We’ve Been Sold🧵 1. Feminism Killed Chivalry https://t.co/QX4Rq00nN1

mazemoore
Posted - August 2, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 1:10 PM

@mazemoore - MAZE

This video is a great representation of the MSM and government over the past decade. Lie. Lie. Lie. We need to protect you from disinformation.https://t.co/0jWc80Exz4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The dossier alleges the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, not just benefiting from interference but actively participating. The Trump campaign and Alpha Bank appeared to hide covert communications between their servers. Vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person, unable to use them as a host. News organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered live platform to remarks by former president Trump, not out of spite, but because of the cost of knowingly broadcasting untrue things.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The bottom line of this dossier, the bottom line allegation, the point of it is that the Trump campaign didn't just benefit from Russia interfering in our presidential campaign. The point of this is they colluded. They helped. They were in on it. This is kind of a real story. The connections between the Trump servers and the Alpha Bank servers were real. They were covert communications that someone was trying to hide, that the Trump Organization and Alpha Bank appeared to have been trying to hide. Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. We and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered live platform to remarks by former president Trump. It is not out of spite. It is not a decision that we relish. It is a decision that we regularly revisit. And honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision, but there is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are.
officialmcafee
Posted - August 30, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Saved - September 1, 2025 at 6:40 AM

@officialmcafee - John McAfee

The media has been the mouthpiece of the government most likely from its inception. They feed us their lies by way of our favored news channels, and we gobble it up without a second thought. When will we learn? When will enough be enough? When will we wake up? https://t.co/gxvMieBf3w

Video Transcript AI Summary
"We need to talk about how the media is the mouthpiece of the US government." "This man was over six feet tall, and we're expected to believe that he himself from a bunk bunk that is five and a half feet tall." "However, it has to be with enough force to break his neck in multiple places in ways which are indicative of a person being violently strangled." "unbelievable coincidences of his cellmate being moved out of his cell just hours before his death." "The cameras are conveniently located so that nothing records anything in that area." "The guards that are supposed to be guarding him were told to go home because there's maintenance happening." "This is your fucking life and your kids and your families. Wake up."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to talk about how the media is the mouthpiece of the US government. How it is visible everywhere and yet invisible because of its subtlety. But sometimes, it's not quite so subtle. Let's give an example. Very recent, and it's still on everyone's mind. The death of Jeffrey Epstein. Now this man was over six feet tall, and we're expected to believe that he himself from a bunk bunk that is five and a half feet tall. That is maybe on his knees and just leans forward and himself. However, it has to be with enough force to break his neck in multiple places in ways which are indicative of a person being violently strangled. Now, let's add to that the unbelievable coincidences of his cellmate being moved out of his cell just hours before his death. No witnesses in the cell. The cameras are conveniently located so that nothing records anything in that area. The guards that are supposed to be guarding him were told to go home because there's maintenance happening. Add to this, he had said someone is trying to kill me. And all of the other inmates are saying he was well adjusted and nowhere near Please God, people, we know it was not. And yet, and yet, as soon as the official report comes out, suddenly it's the media says it's as if god shed some magnificent light of truth that we all now are happy with. Please god, see what is happening here. This is your fucking life and your kids and your families. Wake up.
SternDrewCrypto
Posted - March 20, 2026 at 11:08 AM
Saved - March 20, 2026 at 11:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim a former FBI head says 9/11 was an inside job planned by the highest levels of the U.S. government to fuel endless wars, the Patriot Act, and trillions for the military–industrial complex. I see a long pattern: OKC, JFK, RFK, 1993 WTC, 9/11, and elite-led child-sex trafficking. The deep-state playbook stages crises, pins them on patsies, erodes freedoms, and shields the cabal. Media and tech help, but cracks appear. Who still swallows the official lies?

@SternDrewCrypto - Stern Drew

🚨 FORMER FBI HEAD CONFIRMS 9/11 WAS ORCHESTRATED AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT! Former FBI Head says 9/11 was a deliberate inside job planned and executed by the highest levels of the U.S. government. The goal? Endless wars, the Patriot Act surveillance nightmare, and trillions funneled to the military-industrial complex. This is not a one-off event. It's part of a long pattern they've desperately tried to bury. Connect the dots: - Oklahoma City Bombing (1995): Government-supplied materials and inside assistance used in a controlled demolition to vilify militias and ram through anti-terror legislation. - JFK Assassination (1963): CIA, Mafia, and deep-state coup after he threatened their power structure. - RFK Assassination (1968): Another Kennedy silenced because he knew too much about CIA operations and mind-control programs. - 1993 World Trade Center bombing: The test run on the same towers by the same networks. - 9/11 (2001): Planes used as cover story while nano-thermite brought the buildings down in free-fall speed. Pentagon hit by a missile? Flight 93 shot down? All manufactured to launch the never-ending "War on Terror." - Child sex trafficking networks run by the Military, CIA, and top politicians: Epstein Island was just the tip. D.C. parties, underground tunnels, blackmail videos. Victims are silenced. Whistleblowers end up "suicided." This is the deep-state playbook in action: stage massive crises, pin them on patsy enemies, strip away freedoms, and protect the pedophile elite cabal that runs everything. They own the mainstream media, Big Tech censorship machines, and the official narrative. But the cracks are showing. The truth is bleeding out. Who else is done swallowing the official lies?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ted Gunderson describes a 27.5-year FBI career with 13 assignments across the United States, noting he never lived in the extreme Northeast. He says he handled counterespionage and counterterrorism in New York and Connecticut, negotiated with skyjackers at Philadelphia International Airport for two and a half hours on 07/12/1972, and led large divisions in Southern California with over 700 personnel. He personally investigated the Oklahoma City bombing, John F. Kennedy’s assassination, Robert Kennedy’s assassination, and the World Trade Center, labeling all as “huge cover up.” Gunderson asserts that terrorism is being used as an excuse to strip constitutional rights and civil liberties, mentions the Bilderbergs, and identifies himself as the FBI veteran who retired in March 1979, having been the senior special agent in charge of the FBI Los Angeles division with more than 700 personnel and a $22.5 million budget. He says he was on the street for nine and a half years, then progressed administratively to supervisory roles, including being the numbers two man in Connecticut and Philadelphia, an assistant special agent in charge, chief inspector, and agent in charge in Memphis, Dallas, and then senior special agent in charge in Los Angeles with three other SACs under him and 24 supervisors. Gunderson claims to have “information chiseled in stone” that the FBI had advanced knowledge of 9/11 and did nothing to prevent it. He states he watched the planes hit the towers on television and questions the feasibility of hijacking four planes without advance knowledge, asserting the US government has the most advanced intelligence and that there is no way they wouldn’t have known. He questions whether planes were remotely controlled and insists the towers were imploded, citing seismograph readings near the base and molten steel in the basement that burned for about 100 days, arguing that airplane fuel could not account for these effects. He contends anti-terror legislation emerged in the mid-1980s under the George H. W. Bush administration, citing a female DOJ attorney who allegedly said, before passage, that “people have to be killed.” He references the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, noting an informant who helped plan the attack and claims the FBI knew in advance and supplied bomb ingredients, a claim he says appeared in the New York Times on 10/28/1993. He argues that insufficient deaths prevented anti-terror legislation, and, regarding Oklahoma City (1995), claims a pineapple electrohydrodynamic gaseous fuel device bomb was used, followed by a conventional bomb inside, suggesting multiple devices. Gunderson mentions four unexploded devices retrieved from the Murrah Building, as reported in a Fireman’s Magazine article (Sept. 1995). He references news coverage of recovered unexploded devices marked with “US Army” on the side and asserts that McVeigh was a mind-control victim, alleging he was recruited by the CIA to be a professional assassin and involved with the CIA drug operation. He ties this to MKUltra and Monarch programs, stating he learned of these after leaving the FBI while investigating the Jeffrey R. MacDonald case. He recounts his involvement with satanic cult allegations linked to the MacDonald case, claiming a Satanic cult distributed drugs along the East Coast and that a satanic ring operated internationally, including child kidnapping rings, with a focus on the Finders in Washington, DC. He discusses the 1960s–1980s era, mentioning the kidnapping of children like Johnny Gosch in Iowa, and asserts ongoing international trafficking and sex trafficking of children, including claims of flights of children to Paris and New York. He says he has provided documentation to the FBI multiple times but has been ignored, alleging covert CIA involvement in child trafficking. He mentions tips from airline employees and another informant, Paul Bonassi, stating that children were auctioned off for up to $50,000, with ages from two to 21, and that buyers bid on children like automobiles, all of which he says is occurring under nose of authorities, with copies of US customs reports supporting his claims.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Actually, I had a quite an illustrious career, twenty seven and a half years in the FBI. And in those twenty seven and a half years, I had 13 assignments, so I moved around the country. The only part of the country I never did live in was really the Extreme Northeast, US. So, also, during my career, I handled just about everything. I was counter espionage, counter terrorism in New York and Connecticut, and I negotiated with some skyjackers at Philadelphia International Airport for two and a half hours, 07/12/1972. And I ended up being in charge of most of Southern California, had over 700 personnel under my command. I personally investigated the Oklahoma City bombing case, huge cover up. Jack Kennedy's assassination, huge cover up. Bobby Kennedy's assassination, huge cover up. World Trade Center, huge cover up. Okay. Terrorism. They're using it as an excuse to take away our constitutional rights and our civil liberties. The Bilderbergs. I'm Ted l Gunderson, a twenty seven year veteran of the FBI who retired in March 1979. At the time of my retirement, I was the senior special agent in charge of the FBI Los Angeles division with more than 700 personnel under my command and a budget of $22,500,000. I was an agent on the street for nine and a half years, and then I advanced administratively. I was a supervisor, and then I was numbers two man in Connecticut and Philadelphia, and assistant special agent in charge was the title. And then I became a chief inspector, and then I was agent in charge in Memphis, Dallas, and the senior special agent in charge in Los Angeles because I had three other special agents in charge under me and 24 supervisors under them. I have information chiseled in stone, documented that the FBI had advanced knowledge about nine eleven and did nothing to prevent this from occurring. And this is atrocious. It's unbelievable, have having been a former FBI agent myself. And it's very obvious that this whole thing has been orchestrated by the powers that be at the highest level of our government, and I want the world to know about it. The minute I saw the planes fly in to the tower on television live, as a matter of fact, the question I had in my mind was, there is no way, absolutely no way, that somebody could skyjack four planes, 20 people skyjack four planes, in this case 19 individuals, and our government would not know about it in in advance. We have, the US government, the most advanced intelligence techniques of anybody in the world, and there you will never convince me we didn't have advanced knowledge about what was going on. We saw the airplanes go in, and it's also a question about whether they're remotely controlled. I don't know about that. I hate to comment on something that I where I have no documentation, but there's much more to this story than has come out so far. You'll never in a million years convince me that those those buildings, those towers collapsed because those planes hit them. I'm I'm confident that they were imploded. As a matter of fact, the there were seismograph readings from the they think from the base of two of them about the time that the buildings collapsed. There were also molten steel that was in the basement, which is a very high temperature for melt melting steel, and those planes hit above the 80th Floor, so there's no way that that airplane fuel could have dropped down that low. Also, there were fires that burned in the basement for some one hundred days afterwards. So there's some implication. There there's some finagling, there's some maneuvering as far as I'm concerned, and there are many, many more people involved in this than these these so called skyjackers and terrorists. The anti terrorism legislation was written back in the middle nineteen eighties under the George Bush senior administration. A female Department of Justice attorney who was one of the authors made the statement publicly, before this passes congress, people have to be killed. Now if we fast forward to a World Trade Center car bombing in February 1993, at that time, the FBI had a 43 year old former Egyptian army officer as an informant who was in with the terrorists. He was commissioned by the terrorists to put the bomb together. He went to his FBI superiors. We're gonna use a dummy bomb. Right? And they said, no. We're gonna use a real bomb. So the FBI know they knew in advance that they were gonna bomb the World Trade Center. They furnished the ingredients for the bomb, which is absolutely unbelievable that they get away with this. What's unbelievable about it is this was actually printed in the New York Times on 10/28/1993, but they got away with it. And if I was a congressman or senator, I would demand an investigation. Why would the FBI finally see ingredients for the bomb that brought down or that that had damaged the World Trade Center in February 1993? We had six people killed there. We had a thousand people injured. We had a total of six citizens who died in the February. We had a thousand dollars worth of a thousand individuals were injured. We had half $1,000,000 in damage, but there weren't enough people who died to pass the anti terrorism legislation. So now we fast forward to May 19 04/19/1995, world trade excuse me, Oklahoma City bombing. We had a hundred and sixty eight, a hundred and sixty nine people who died, probably a hundred and sixty nine because there was a one leg they never did identify. And a year later, the anti terrorist legislation passed. Now it wasn't tough enough. I can't prove that there were explosives that were placed in the World Trade Center in the nine one one situation. However, I from what I've seen, a a an expert on implosions from Albuquerque, New Mexico, he worked for the government as under government contract, stated immediately afterwards that the buildings were imploded. And then he retracted his statement and said, well, maybe they were, maybe they weren't. And, basically, now he's saying that they weren't imploded. But other experts who have looked at the at the pictures say that the buildings were imploded. I think that in order to implode those buildings, there had to be implications, government implications or involvement in placing these charges. I mean, that was a tremendous project. I mean, I don't know how many people would be involved in that. Going back to Oklahoma City, an inside investigator told me there were at least 11 other people involved in the Oklahoma City bombing. Now if you have 11 other people involved in Oklahoma City, you're gonna have three or four times that involved in the World Trade Center situation. Going back to Oklahoma City, the government claimed that there was a fertilizer, ammonium nitrate fertilizer bomb in the truck. Initially, it came out, I think, with 1,500 pounds and then it's 2,500 pounds. In the end, they said 4,800 pounds. Fertilizer bomb explodes in 360 degree, but there's no question about it, the bomb that was in that truck was a directional bomb. Now, there was a bomb called electrohydrodynamic gaseous fuel device that was developed in the early nineteen eighties, highly classified. It was developed by Hercules Manufacturing in Silicon Valley, California. At the time of the first explosion in the experiment on in Area 51, two technicians were died because they underestimated its the power and and the strength of this bomb. My informant, my main informant, Michael Ricconosudo, whose firm Hercules Manufacturing actually developed this bomb, Michael was with the agency for years, it was his father Marshall, told me that the bomb in the the truck bomb in Oklahoma City was this electrohydrodynamic gaseous fuel device. We call it a pineapple bomb because it's the size of a pineapple, but very, powerful. And then what I think happened in Oklahoma City is that we had the pineapple bomb go off, and then nine seconds later, we had a conventional bomb go off on the inside. With regard to this proceeding, basically, there are four elements that I have to receive information regarding. I have a newspaper article, actually a publication from the Fireman's Magazine where the author, who is the editor of the magazine and obtained the information from the Oklahoma City Fire Department, states that four unexploded devices were brought out of Oklahoma City, the Murrah Building, that four unexploded devices were brought out of the Murrah Building. This is in this article, the fireman's publication. I think it was September of of nineteen ninety five when it was published. Now if if that's the case, then you had five conventional bombs planted on the inside, and you had the barometric bomb or the pineapple bomb in the truck. And now we have the news media. I have copies of the news media that were recorded that afternoon, the afternoon of Oklahoma City. And reporter after reporter after reporter has made the statement, oh, they recovered a not a bomb. A bomb that was unexploded. One of them specifically said, they recovered a bomb, and now we're gonna know where the bombs came from because it has US army written on the side, stenciled on the side. So we have and McVeigh as far as McVeigh was concerned, I I think McVeigh was a mind control victim. He they the government said he's flunked out of special forces. I doubt that. I think he was in special force. He wrote a letter to his sister saying he'd been recruited by the CIA to be trained as a professional assassin and also to work on the CIA drug operation. And he was visited in Oklahoma City and in Colorado when he was in custody by doctor Jolly West, DLA. Doctor West is the foremost expert on MK Ultra. MK Ultra is a government CIA mine control program. I was not this I had absolutely no knowledge of the project MKUltra, the Monarch project during the period I was in the FBI. It was only after I got out of the FBI and I started doing my own research, and that came about because I was the investigator of the Jeffrey R. MacDonald case. He's a former Green Bay doctor who was convicted of murdering his wife and two children in Fort Bragg, 02/17/1970. And he was tried and convicted, sentenced to three consecutive life sentences. I was called into the case after he'd been tried and convicted. His friend said he's innocent, and I began my investigation. Within ten months, 10/25/1980, I obtained a signed confession from a girl, Helena Stokely, who said doctor McDonald did not commit those crimes. Were committed by her satanic cult group. The satanic cult group was distributing drugs up and down the East Coast. Were being flown in plastic bags. These are the body cavities of the dead GIs coming out of Southeast Asia. This is the late sixties, early seventies. This is all documented. Time magazine, 01/01/1973. Doctor McDonald's absolutely innocent, and he's in jail today, twenty some years in prison. Now the reason I tell you about that case is because after I developed this information and went public with my confession from Alina, I was on national TV. I was on radio talk shows, and people came from all parts of The United States and said, hey. I know all about that satanic cults. It's for real. I'm a a victim, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. And that's how I became involved and embroiled in these very controversial issues. And then I started doing my own research, and one thing led to another. And then I investigated international child kidnapping ring out of the the Midwest, out of Nebraska. There were they were flying children out of Sioux City, Iowa to Washington DC for sex orgies with congressmen, senators, and just it went on and on. Then I had the the McMartin case out of the southern man Southern California. The children were dropped off in the school in the morning by their parents. They picked them up late in the afternoon in the interim. They put the kids through tunnels and up into the trapdoor, the triplex next door, put them in automobiles, and prostituted them. Two, three, four year old children. Unbelievable. And this is this is how I became involved in all these issues. And I just kept going. As to any good investigator, would you I just keep going. The the international child kidney opinion is not being exposed. I have personally given my documentation to the FBI on at least six or eight occasions, and I have been ignored because it's a covert CIA child kidnapping operation that's been active since the early nineteen sixties. What's happening here is these children are being flown or were in the past in the nineteen eighties out of Sioux City, Iowa to Washington DC for these sex orgies for the purpose of black men in the congressman, compromising them. And, of course, hey. There's a bill that's gonna be passed on Monday, and then I can come around and say, congressman, you remember when you were with that little boy, that little girl last Friday? Okay. You better vote this way. This is that's exactly what's happening. It's called blackmail. This is a CIA covert operation. It's called the Finders out of Washington, DC. And they're involved in kidnapping and international trafficking of children around the world. And I had, in my day, in the eighties, I had one of the kids who was actually part of the kidnapping team when he was 10, 11, 12 years old. They were putting him out as a decoy in a park, certain shopping malls, and so forth. And to attract the kids his age over near the car, and then the adults would grab the children and be offered. And one little kid was a 12 year old newspaper boy named Johnny Gosch out of West Des Moines, Iowa. Johnny Gosch was kidnapped. And back in 1982, he was taken in, used as a sex slave. Later, he and another kid escaped. They stole a car and escaped, and Johnny Gosch is in hiding right today, by the way. The children are used for body parts. They're used for satanic ceremonies, human sacrifices. They're used as sex slaves. In 1997, I think it was, I was in Denver giving a lecture. I had a tip from an airline employee that 210 children flew out of Denver to New York and then on to Paris, France. The airline employee who saw this was refueling the plane, asked a female adult and two male adults who were with the children. Sorry. Go ahead. Asked a female adult and two male adults who are with the children, who are these kids? And they said the woman says, Child Protective Services, mind your own business. And that man, by the way, has disappeared. I also had a tip from an airline employee, a flight attendant out of Los Angeles that a plane load of kids, children was flown to Paris, France. Paul Bonassi, my informant inside the Nebraska case, who was part of the net the child network, told me that he's at least some of these kids are auctioned off. He's attended six such auctions. As few as six and as many as 36 children were auctioned off at these various at these various auction. The children sell for up to $50,000 each, sometimes more. The ages are two to 21. The kids stand on a stage in their underwear with a number across their with the string around their neck and a number on a cord on a piece of cardboard, and the people in the audience bid on them, just like bidding on an automobile. This is going on right under our nose. I've given this to the FBI and demanded investigation. I gave the latest complaint I filed is in writing as of November. I just keep pumping it over to them, keep giving it to them. And I have a US customs report that documents this.
View Full Interactive Feed