reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - August 21, 2023 at 11:56 PM

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

IMPORTANT Visual Representation of The Mysteries of Babylon and Secret Societies- By William Cooper This is one of the Greatest Documentaries you’ll ever experience Share everywhere Know Your Enemy

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explores the ancient mysteries and their ties to secret societies like Freemasonry. The speaker presents evidence from various authors and Masonic writings to support their claims. They discuss the hidden worship of pagan gods known as the mysteries, with the serpent symbolizing wisdom and the star representing divine wisdom. The speaker warns of a war against the American people and urges action. Additionally, the video delves into the concept of sun worship, its connection to religious and secret societies, and how it was used by leaders to gain power. Adolf Hitler's association with sun worship is mentioned, along with biblical references condemning the practice. The video emphasizes the importance of understanding the influence of sun worship in religious and societal contexts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm William Cooper, and you're listening to the hour of the time. Tonight, folks, we've got to get you back into the stream. And the way I do that is I quit telling you about my research and I quote Exactly from the horse's mouth, so you'll know that what you're hearing on this program, the hour, the time, is not being made up by me or anyone else. And it's there for anyone to find if you'll just get off your butts and go to the library, and start digging, and looking, and searching, and reading, And quit listening to what you're told, including what you're told on this show. Remember, my admonition is not to ever believe anything you hear from the mouth of anyone or that you read from the book written by anyone or from Dan Rather in the 6 o'clock news or the president of the United States, Archer Carter, Tom Valentine, Rush Limbaugh, the man who's sitting on half of his brain, are indeed from even your own mother. For folks, the deception in this world right now That's being promulgated in order to bring about a one world totalitarian socialist government is so deep that you better be standing on a stump or you might drown. Alice Bailey, Folks, one of the key members of the new age religion wrote this. Quote, there is no question, therefore, that the work to be done in familiarizing the general public with the nature of the mysteries is of paramount importance at this time. These mysteries will be restored to outer expression through the medium of the church and the masonic fraternity, unquote. And she's absolutely 100% correct. The question of just what the ancient mysteries were, folks, was answered in part by Albert G. Mackey, another 33rd degree Mason. He wrote a 2 volume work entitled encyclopedia of freemasonry. And he wrote this under the subject of the ancient mysteries. Quote, Each of the pagan gods had, besides the public and open, a secret worship paid to him to which none were admitted but Those who had been selected by preparatory ceremonies called initiation. This secret worship was termed The mysteries, unquote. The student of the masonic order can know that when mister Mackey writes, His writings can be relied upon. He is considered to be one of the premier masonic authors of all time. These are the comments from the biographical information presented on mister Mackey in the front of his encyclopedia. Quote, His writings are universally esteemed for their sincerity, honest records, and common sense. He was a leader in research who valued accuracy, unquote. Carl Cloughey, another Mason who writes on the subject of the lodge, also has words of praise for mister Mackey. Quote, he was one of the greatest students and most widely followed authorities the masonic world has ever known, Unquote. And in his book entitled, Introduction to Freemasonry, he praised mister Mackey with these words. Quote, Albert Gallatin Mackey, one of the greatest students and most widely followed authorities the masonic world has known. He is the great master of freemasonry, unquote. So mister Mackey certainly can be believed when he tells his readers that the worship of pagan gods had a secret non visible worship besides the public one. The reader can believe him when he identifies the name of this secret worship. He told his readers, quote, this secret worship was termed the mysteries, unquote. Another who has written about the subject of the ancient mysteries was Manley P. Hall, another 33rd degree Mason whom I have quoted extensively before in this series. He has written in his book entitled, what the ancient wisdom expects of its disciples. Quote, In the remote past, the gods walked with men and they chose from among the sons of men the wisest and the truest. With these specially ordained and illuminated sons, they left the keys of their great wisdom, which was the knowledge of good and evil. These illuminated ones founded what we know as the ancient mysteries, unquote. Now in case you weren't listening there, this is a dead giveaway and an admission that the gods that walked with men were known, At least in the Bible, as Satan. For he says here, and I'm gonna read this again for you folks because I know some of you just didn't pick it up. Because I know how the minds of the sheep will operate, and there's a lot of sheeple listening. There's also a lot of people listening who aren't sheeple, And they know that I'm not talking to them. If the word sheeple applied to you makes you angry, Then folks, it is an indication that it fits you like a shoe, like a glove, that you are indeed in front of the sheeple. Let me read it again. Quote, with the specially ordained and illuminated sons, they left the keys of their great wisdom, which was the knowledge of good and evil. According to the Bible, the knowledge of good and evil was imparted to Adam When Satan enticed Eve to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, and she in turn enticed Adam. And what was the fruit of the tree of knowledge? It was the knowledge of good and evil. It was forbidden for man to know that. Now I'm not making judgment on any of this, I'm just telling you what my research says. Remember, this is not a religious program. And while I myself personally have my own idea of what my own religion is, I am in no means trying to hoist it off on anyone else. Let me continue. He wrote and we're talking about Manley P. Hall, 33rd degree freemason. He wrote additional comments about these mysteries in another of the books he has written called, The Secret teachings of all ages. And I would urge you if you can afford it to buy that book, it's a very expensive book. I have a copy of it in my library. It cost me $150 and it was worth every single penny of it, I can assure you. Quote, the arcana, defined as being a secret or hidden knowledge of the ancient mysteries, were never revealed to the profane. Defined as those not initiated into the inner mysteries, except through the media of symbols. You're gonna find folks that symbols mean more than you will ever begin to understand Unless you waded deep into the stream of the mystery Babylon as I have. Quote, symbolism fulfilled the dual office of concealing the sacred truths from the uninitiated and revealing to those qualified to understand the symbols, unquote. Mister Hall dedicated the latter book to, quote, the proposition that concealed within the emblematic figures, Allegories and rituals of the ancients is a secret doctrine concerning the inner mysteries of life, Which doctrine has been preserved in toto, which means in the whole, among a small band of initiated minds since the very beginning of the world, unquote. He went on to mention that the mysteries, quote, were secret societies binding their initiates to inviolable secrecy and avenging with death the betrayal of their sacred trust, And to this day, they take blood oaths. Mister Hall told the reader that no one is to know the identity of those who have received the secrets. In fact, he wrote, quote, the true adept and initiate shall reveal his identity to no man unless that one is worthy to receive it, unquote. He further explained where some of these initiates lived when he wrote, quote, no reasonable doubt can exist that the initiates of Greece, Egypt, and other ancient countries possessed the correct solutions to those great cultural, Intellectual, moral, and social problems, which in an unsolved state confront the humanity of the 20th century, unquote. He further amplified that thought when he added this, quote, Neo Platonism, defined by mister Hall as a school founded by Plotinus around 240 AD, concerning itself with the problems of metaphysics, which he calls the Study of knowledge recognizes the existence of a secret and all important doctrine, which from the time of the earliest Civilizations had been concealed within the rituals, symbols and allegories of religions and philosophies, Unquote. So in summary, it is possible, folks, to understand what these ancient mysteries were. And there appears to be at least 4 truths gleaned from the information provided in the comments made Previously. And these truths appear to be. 1, the ancient mysteries had two forms of worshiping the same God. 2, the knowledge of the true God was reserved for those who had been entrusted with the secrets not for those whom they call the profane. 3, Those who understood those secrets were sworn to the strictest secrecy. And 4, Those who had knowledge of the secrets claimed to possess all of the answers to all of the problems of mankind. Now there was an additional secret for the secret bearers. They had to be initiated in a private initiation ceremony. Albert Pike, general Albert Pike, a Southern Confederate general during the Civil War, wrote this, Quote, initiation was considered to be a mystical death. And the perfect was then said to be regenerated, newborn, restored to a renovated existence of life, light and purity, unquote. In fact, folks, this, quote, newborn, unquote, experience is similar to the experience the, quote, born again, unquote, Christians go through. The Christians call their experience a second birth, just as the Masons do. In fact, Albert Pike calls a similar ceremony a, quote, born again, unquote, experience. And he wrote this, Quote. In the Indian mysteries, the third degree, the initiate is said to be born again, unquote. The ceremony in the ancient mysteries has been described by the masonic writer, Manley p Hall. Quote, in the ancient system of initiation, The truth seeker must pass through a 2nd birth. And those who attained this exalted state were known thereafter as, quote, the twice born, unquote. This new birth must be personally earned through a complete regeneration of and conduct, unquote. This new birth ceremony involves a symbolic death according to the Mason Kenneth Mackenzie, and he wrote this. Quote, in the ancient mysteries, the aspirant could not participate in the highest secrets until he had been placed in the coffin. In this, he was symbolically said to die And his resurrection was to the light, unquote. Do you remember I told you about the initiation that George Bush Underwent in the crypt, also known as the tomb, the skull and bones, the brotherhood of death at Yale University. This is what they're talking about. During a press conference, a reporter asked George Bush if he was a Christian. And he replied thusly, Quote, if you're asking if I have been born again, the answer is yes, Unquote. And indeed, he had. Modern day Masons participate in an almost similar ceremony to the one described by these masonic writers. In the 3rd degree called the master mason degree, Inside the Blue Lodge, the candidate is actually knocked off of his feet by several of the masons in attendance. He is wrapped up in a blanket and moved to the western end of the temple. There, after further ceremony, he is raised up by a grip called the master's grip or the grip of the lion's paw. Those who learned the mysteries also learned that they had a secret project, one that was described by Albert Pike in his book entitled morals and dogma. Mister Pike wrote this, quote, behold our object, The end, the result of the great speculations of antiquity, the ultimate annihilation of evil and restoration of man to his first date by a redeemer, a messiah, a, the incarnate word, reason, or power of deity, unquote. I urge you all, if you could find a copy of morals and dogma by Albert Pike to purchase it, take it home and read it. Mister Hall told his readers that those who had been initiated into the mysteries were the secret power behind the governments of the past. He wrote this about these ancient initiates in his book entitled, What the Ancient Wisdom Expects of Its Disciples. Quote. They are the invisible powers behind the thrones of Earth, and men are but marionettes Dancing while the invisible ones pull the strings. We see the dancer, but the mastermind that does the work remains concealed by the cloak of silence, unquote. Remember, I told you folks That if you don't open your mind and if you don't quit believing dogma, if you don't quit believing what people tell you, If you don't stop believing what Dan Rather tells you on the 6 o'clock news or your local minister down at your church are your mother, are the president of the United States. And if you don't start digging to find the truth yourself, you You, the sheeple, are the marionettes dancing while the invisible ones pull the strings. And until you change that pattern of your life, you will always be the puppet on the end of someone else's string. And I know that that's not what you want to be, is it? Well, if it's not, change your life now. Stop believing what you're told, including what you hear on this show unless it checks out in your own research, Your own experience, your own digging. Each of us must find our own truth. And if our we are really looking and digging, We're ultimately going to come to something near the same truth for all of us. And I can tell you now that most of us have been living in fantasy land for all of our lives. We don't even know anything near With the truth of any matter is, we must begin an honest search. Starting from the beginning, Wiping the slate clean, cleansing our mind, and looking at the world, beginning again as though through the eyes of a newborn child. And you will find that most of what you've ever been taught in your entire life is a lie. Is a lie. Other writers, folks, have confirmed the thoughts of mister Hall. A masonic scholar named George Steinmetz also acknowledged that these exist and that some of the members inside the Masonic lodges are custodians of the secrets. He has written this in his book entitled Freemasonry, its hidden meaning. Quote, ancient secret doctrine, which is sealed in masonic allegory and symbolism. It was but to preserve these truths for future generations that masonry was perpetuated, unquote. And if that is true, why is it a secret? Why not tell us all what this secret doctrine is? For modern man is not like ancient man when he didn't know how to read or reason or understand. Modern man has the capability To understand anything that is put before him and accept it if it is the truth and reject it if it is a lie. So why the secrecy? The secrecy is because, folks, the real secret of mystery Babylon is how to control everyone else. And if they reveal these secrets, they won't have the control, for it'll be in the hands of everyone. That is the greatest secret of the secret societies. Another writing of Manley P Hall was this, quote, Much of the ritualism of freemasonry is based upon the trials to which candidates were subjected by the ancient Hierophant is defined as the high priest of the mysteries before the keys of wisdom were enthroned to them, unquote. The ancient mysteries had a beginning. According to Mr. Mackey, he wrote about where they started, quote, the first of which are those of Isis and Osiris in Egypt. The most important of these mysteries were the Osiris in Egypt, unquote. Another writer, Edmond Ronain, an ex Mason, confirmed that the Masons were involved in the worship of Osiris when he wrote this in his book entitled, The Master's carpet. Quote, masonry's ceremonies, symbols, and the celebrated legend of Hiram in the master mason's degree were directly borrowed from the ancient mysteries or the secret worship of Baal, Osiris, or Tammuz, unquote. This is a direct admission that freemasonry stems directly out of mystery Babylon, the ancient mystery religion, the worship of Baal, the golden calf, representative of the house during which That 2000 year period, the sun resided. The sun, the symbol of the light, Lucifer, the intellect, the gift, primordial knowing. Albert Pike then detailed where the mysteries went after their beginnings in Egypt, he wrote this in morals and dogma. Quote, from Egypt, the mysteries went to Phoenicia and were celebrated at Tyre. Osiris changed his name and became Adonai or Dionysos, still the representative of the sun. In Greece and Sicily, Osiris took the name of Bacchus. So the ancient mysteries conceal an important mystery kept secret from the average person. The mystics claim that this mystery has been concealed from the world for centuries. Even though they had taken the mystery to other continents, Those who believed in this religion were yet to take it to America. That was yet to come, and we will get to that. I promise you. And it will, I also promise you, amaze you. Lafayette, who was a very famous and noted pirate and a member of Freemasonry and the Knights Templar, said this, quote, an invisible hand is guiding the populace, unquote. Arthur Edward Waite, a prolific writer on secret societies, has written this, quote, beneath the broad tide of human history, there flow the stealthy undercurrents of the secret societies, which frequently determine in the depths the changes that take place upon the surface, unquote. Another who wrote about the power just underneath the surface was president Woodrow Wilson, president of the United States of America, who made this startling statement. He made the statement, yet it was ignored, but it should never go ignored from this point forward. Quote, there is a power so organized, so subtle, so complete, so pervasive That they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it, unquote. So these 2 writers have warned America that secret societies had been arranging the major events of the past, And president Wilson warned those who were quick to condemn these organizations that they had better be cautious. Albert Pike also connected the secret societies with a secret belief in his book entitled morals and dogma. He wrote that all secret orders and associations, Quote. And remember, he said, all all secret orders and associations, quote, had 2 doctrines, 1 concealed and reserved for the masters, the other public, unquote. Now one such secret society with 2 doctrines was the Illuminati. And professor Weishaupt, its founder, boasted of his organization's He realized that this secrecy would enable them to decide the fate of nations. And because their deliberations were secret, No outsider could interfere. He wrote this, quote, the great strength of our order lies in its concealment. Let it never appear in its own name, but always covered by another name and another occupation, unquote. Weishaupt later wrote about that secrecy in a letter to a fellow member of the Illuminati. Quote. Nothing can bring this about but hidden societies. Hidden schools of wisdom are the means which will one day free men from their bonds, princes, and nations shall vanish from the earth, unquote. Well, folks, you've heard all through this series of broadcast about a group of men supposedly with the only truly minds in this world who are going to set up a utopia on Earth, a heaven on Earth, if you will. And that they are the ones who are going to rule through a benevolent autism. And they call this utopia, the great society, the new world order, the utopian philosophy, all of these things. Now Lyndon Johnson Lyndon Baines Johnson was a member of this secret society. He was, in fact, a 33rd degree freemason. And his great society that he envisioned was exactly what we're talking about here. And you can see that Johnson, a great socialist, The Marxist secretly set us on the road to socialism by setting up this great welfare state, which he called the great society. It's 1 in the same folks, it's the same. George Bush's new world order is the same. The new world order that our forefathers envisioned was the The great society talked about during the peasant's revolt in England was the same, The same that is coming unless we wake up to stop it. And you can see by the welfare state how well it really works. It doesn't work at all. It never will work. It can't work. These people are Looney Tunes. If you believe the exoteric version of what they intend to bring about. You see, they have no intention of bringing about a utopia, a heaven on earth, A great society? Not at all. That's to lure the unwary, the foolish, the great massive followers that make The lower degrees of the secret society, so that they will support the completion of the great work, the plan. They really intend this to be something along the lines of what Hitler attempted to establish. They talk about it in terms of a great cleansing, Where certain religions, certain people, certain races will literally be eliminated from this earth. And they are convicted through their own words. Ladies and gentlemen, as you are hearing tonight, you've heard another broadcast For when I feel that you are getting to the point where you're not understanding what's happening, I go back as I'm doing tonight and quote these people directly from their own mouths. I'm going to do that again tomorrow night, folks, so be ready. Let me continue. The sacred societies were created to bring the world to the new society known as the New World Order. The members of these organizations obviously feel that their goals are so noble That they may perform whatever tasks are required to bring them to that goal and that goal to fruition. This means, folks, that murder, Plunder and lying all become acceptable as long as these methods assist its members in obtaining their goal. But the Freemasons are freemasons as the true term began. Want the world to know that They are not one of the societies involved in changing the world's civilization, and they're quick to rush to their own defense. However, when you go back and read their own history in their own words, you can see that they have literally no defense. For they are convicted by the words of their leaders, by the very words of their leaders and folks by their deeds. For it was general Albert Pike who created through the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. It was the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry that created the branch known as Banai Berith, which then created the ADL, the Anti Defamation League, which is nothing but an organization of criminals who murdered, who have bombed, who have lied. And just recently, one of their revealed crimes was Spying, putting spies within the police organizations of the United States of America and spiriting out files and records. And all of the Jews in the United States support this criminal organization to their great shame. And those of you who feel that the Jews are responsible for all of this, You are wrong. Most Jews don't know any more about this than you did. And they are being used just as you are being used, just as I have been used in my life. In all time, truth has been hidden under symbols, wrote Albert Pike. And he also wrote this, symbols are nevertheless, ingenious veiled that cover the truth. Now Albert Pike was the sovereign grand commander of the southern jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. The Scottish Rite now controls world freemasonry. There certainly seems, folks, to be a power and knowing something that you can't tell your family, friends, children, or business acquaintances. And Adam Weishaupt said it best with this selection from his writings, quote, Of all the means I know to lead men, the most effectual is a concealed mystery, unquote. And that is true. I found in my research that the bass, fools, the followers flocked to the mysteries and the promise of learning some secret During their climb up the ladder of degrees of initiation, the truth is that only a very few ever learn anything. And what they learn is how to control the rest. The power of hidden symbols was alluded to by another writer. This time, Foster Bailey in his book entitled, The Spirit of Freemasonry. Quote, a symbol veils or hides a secret and is that which veils certain mysterious forces. These energies when released can have a potent effect. And indeed, they can as we are all feeling now the pinch There are many who can attest to that simple truth, organizations with concealed or secret initiation ceremonies abound in America and indeed around the world. College fraternities and sororities teach the college student to accept secret initiation ceremonies hidden knowledge at a young age. The masons intended for adult males have similar organizations for their young sons and daughters and other secret organizations for their wives. And all of these organizations tend to prepare their male members for further service in the master secret organization, the masons. However, the Masons are quick to point out that they conceal their truths from the general public. Manley p Hall, For instance, wrote this, quote, it is for the adepts. An adept is defined by the dictionary as one who is an expert, But there is an esoteric definition that shall be discussed later. Quote, it is for the adepts, One to understand the meaning of the symbols, symbols could make one wise, quote. An understanding of these symbols is the beginning of wisdom, unquote. Max Toth, a writer about the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt, also wrote about the purpose of symbols. And he said, quote, the knowledge of the ancient mysteries was never revealed to the layman except through the media of symbols. Symbolism fulfilled both the need conceal sacred truths from the uninitiated and to offer a language for those qualified to understand it. Whatever these secrets are folks, 1 writer on the subject feels it is time to make them public. Alice Bailey, One of the key writers supporting the new age movement wrote this, quote, the hour for the ancient mysteries has arrived. These ancient mysteries were hidden in numbers, in ritual, in words, and in symbology. These veil the secret, unquote. Another writer who writes on the order, Carl H. Clouty, told anyone who read the masonic literature that he had best understand the language or they would miss the true meaning of the words. He wrote, quote, he who hears but the words of freemasonry misses their meaning entirely, Rex Hutchins, a 32nd degree Mason who has written a book for the Masons, one so important that it was used to replace 1 written by Henry Clausen, A former sovereign commander also informed his readers that his writings also concealed a secret. Quote, The word reveal means to reveal. That is to give one explanation and yet continue to maintain the mystery of the symbol by not explaining it in a full and complete manner, unquote. So the language code must be broken if one is to learn the truth about the masonic order. The reason that this is so is because the Masons have admitted that they have concealed the true meaning of some of their language. However, It is possible, folks, to know the true meanings of at least some of the hidden language. And the listener can be certain that the discovered interpretations are correct Because the Masons themselves have revealed the hidden meanings of some of their symbols in some of their own literature. The secret societies, folks that have concealed their purposes and hidden meanings, concealed writings and private initiation ceremonies are admittedly very powerful. One who recognized that power was Benjamin Disraeli, the prime minister of England in the late 1880s, who said this in the House of Commons on July 14, 1856. Quote, there is in Italy a power which we seldom mention in this house. I mean, the secret societies. It is useless to deny because it is impossible to conceal that a great part of Europe, The whole of Italy and France and a great portion of Germany to say nothing of other countries is covered with a network of these secret societies. What their objects. They do not want constitutional government. They want to change the tenure of the land to drive out the present owners of the soil And to put an end to ecclesiastical establishments, meaning religion, unquote. The Masons know about concealing secrets from the rest the world. Carl Clougherty, a masonic writer, told his readers that secrets are inside secrets, which are inside other secrets and he wrote this, Cut through the outer shell and find a meaning, cut through that meaning and find another. Under it, if you dig deep enough, you may find a 3rd, a 4th, Who shall say how many teachings? And even the communists use concealment for the communists were created by the mysteries. The cell system of the communist party was created by the mystery schools, which have used the same system for millennium. Nikolai Lenin, the Marxist communist who communized the Russian nation in the years following the Russian Revolution of 1917 wrote this, quote, We have to use any ruse, dodge, trick, cunning, unlawful method, concealment, and veiling of the truth, unquote. Many of the signs for identifying a communist or a member of the communist party are exactly the same as those symbols and signs used by Freemasons to identify each other. The use of secrecy to conceal thoughts from certain of the members of an organization or from the public is the device of those who have something to hide. That something is so horrible, so terrible that knowledge of that secret must be kept those who would have the most to lose by knowledge of that secret. In the case of the secret societies, It is a belief in Lucifer, also known as Satan or the devil. In the case of communism, it is the truth that the people living in a communist nation know The system does not work. But those in a non communist nation targeted for a communist government are not to learn that simple truth. They're to be told that the system is the culmination of man's upward search for a perfect society, a great society, if you will, a utopia on earth. And they must be deluded into believing that there is no cost in the change from their current form of government to the communist form. One of the things that I find so incredible is that they trap the intellectuals so easily. The intellectuals, the ones who are supposedly so good at using their brain cannot even use their brain so much as to look into history to see that 1st people that the communist, the international socialist destroy, kill, sentenced to the labor camps, the gulag, if you will, are always the intellectuals. And history has recorded the brutality of the communist and the fact that millions of people have had to die as the communists installed that form of government. The evidence to support that condition will be discussed later in some other program. Now, secrecy is certainly not a part of the Christian religion today, although the Religion began in secret and was in fact, a secret society. It is possible to know that nothing that Jesus said has been hidden from the Christians of today. He told the high priest in John, chapter 18, verse 20, quote, and in secret have I said nothing, unquote. The intentional concealing of an organization's beliefs and purposes by the use of hidden language and concealed symbols is reserved primarily to the secret societies and the nationwide Masonic Lodges are indeed a secret society. And in the beginning, the Christians had their secret Symbols also. One of the most prominent was the symbol of the fish. The secret is simply the fact that certain of their members worship Lucifer And that they keep that secret from the overwhelming majority of their own members. And certainly, the public is never to know this fact If they can help it. And the evidence to support that conclusion is ample, but only to one who cares enough to look for it. The problem with most people is they don't care enough to look for anything except wheel of fortune on the television set. So the student of history has to discover the hidden meanings behind the symbols in the masonic literature and in the secret initiation ceremonies to understand the masonic order. One of the first symbols that needs to be examined is the symbol of the serpent, also called a snake or dragon. Manley P. Hall wrote that the use of this symbol is as old as early man when he wrote this in his book entitled the secret teachings of all ages. Quote, among nearly all these ancient peoples, the serpent was accepted as a symbol of wisdom, unquote, for it is from the serpent that man receives the gift of intellect. Here, Mr. Hall states that the serpent was a symbol of wisdom. It will be remembered that Lord Maitreya, the future new age leader, also claimed to possess wisdom. Mister Hall continued, quote, serpent worship in some form has permeated nearly all parts of the Earth. The serpent is the symbol and prototype of the universal savior who redeems the world by giving creation the knowledge of itself and the realization of Good and evil, unquote, an admission that the serpent, at least from the point of view of the Christian Bible is Satan. And then mister Hall links the serpent with the ancient mysteries previously discussed. He continues with the comment that the serpent was worshiped by the priests of that religion. Quote, the priests of the mysteries were symbolized as a serpent, sometimes called hydra, unquote. And then he pointed out that the ancient mysteries have been passed on to various other cultures and that they have been brought forward Ladies and gentlemen, what you have just listened to is a warning is a warning. For there is a war being conducted right at this moment, a war against the American people. It is now a shooting war and the 2nd battle is being fought. The first was fought in the state of Idaho against the family of Randy Weaver. The 2nd battle is being fought by a brave group of men and women and children in a church known as Branch Davidian in Waco, Texas. They are fighting for their creator, endowed rights. They have committed no crimes. They know what the sound of battle is. They know what it's like to see their friends or relatives die in their arms or at their feet. They know what it's like to have wounded and be refused Medicine and medical treatment? Oh, yes. We are at war. Make no mistake about it. And if you don't believe that, You keep your eyes and ears open in the next weeks, months years. You will see it escalate across this country like a wild forest fire out of control. And unless the sheep will wake up and listen and learn and act. I predict that there will be civil war in the United States of America Because there are many of us who will not ever give up our creator endowed rights, our right to keep and bear arms, The Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights without one hell of a fight. And what you heard at the beginning of this program, folks, for those of you who have never experienced war, was the real sounds of war. What you heard were real bullets being fired, real bombs being dropped, real machine guns killing real people. And taps at the end was a real bugle, blowing real taps over real Graves of real fallen men who were buried in Arlington National Cemetery. You see, many people have already died protecting what many of you are giving up. I for 1 will not. When they come for me, there will be another battle. I will not give up, and I don't care who wins or loses. Because at the end of my battle, it would be just the beginning of yours. Do you understand what I'm telling you? You see, my whole purpose is to wake enough people so that no battles ever have to be fought, but we're already behind because 2 have already been fought And more, I guarantee you, are on the way. Guaranteed, folks, guaranteed Because the more we allow them to get away with, the more they will attempt. I don't want a civil war in this country. I want to stop it before it even has a chance to start, and the only way to do that is wake up America. You see, if 200,000,000 people stand up with their right under the 2nd article and amendment to the constitution holding a weapon in their hand and say, enough. We will not put up with this anymore. Stop it now. Get out of our government. Get out of our cities, get out of our military and stay out. That will be the end of it and no shot will ever have to be fired. I guarantee that. But what do you think the odds are of that happening? Now this is the 16th hour of our series on Mystery Babylon. Many of you have already made the necessary connections. You know what's happening and you know who's bringing it about and you know why. Some of you still do not, so we will continue. Manley P. Hall wrote this, quote, the serpent kings, And notice that Mr. Hall capitalized the 2 words as one would do for a deity or for royalty when he wrote this, reigned over the earth. The serpent kings reigned over the earth. It was these serpent kings who founded the mystery schools, which later appeared as the Egyptian and Brahmin mysteries. The serpent was their symbol. They were the true sons of light. And from them have descended a long line of adepts and initiates duly tried and proven according to the law, unquote. And the proper term is not Freemason. It's free It comes from the French, from the Knights Templar, and it literally means the sons of light. Another writer, Wilfred Gregson, informed his readers why Mr. Hall capitalized the 2 words, serpent kings when he wrote, One symbol of great prominence throughout all ancient civilizations is the snake or serpent where it has symbolized divine wisdom. So Mr. Hall had reason to capitalize the words because he had discovered that the serpent represented divinity. Notice also, folks, that Mr. Gregson, even though he chose not to capitalize the word serpent, confirmed that Mr. Hall's use of the capital letter was correct when he stated that there was a connection between divine wisdom and the serpent. Mr. Hall, a 33rd degree Mason made the same connection in these comments. Quote, the serpent is true to the principles of wisdom for it tempts man to The knowledge of himself unquote. A serpent is often used by the agents to symbolize wisdom. The symbol of the serpent has another concealed truth according to Kenneth McKenzie, for he identified that truth in this quote when he described a brazen serpent. Quote, it was a type of mediator and a promise of redemption, unquote. The word brazen folks is defined as bold or impudent, and impudent is defined as shamelessly bold or disrespectful. Now you will remember that Lucifer was an Anointed cherub in heaven who fell because he sought godly power. The story is covered in Isaiah chapter 14 Verses 12 through 14 of the Old Testament. Look it up. It says this, How Art thou fallen from heaven, oh, Lucifer, son of the morning. How art thou cut down to the ground? For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven. I will exalt my throne above the stars of god. I will be like the most high, Therefore, it can be safely said that Lucifer would be considered to be shamelessly bold and of course, disrespectful. It appears that the brazen serpent could be Lucifer. Another author, John Anthony West, wrote a book entitled Serpent in the Sky, in which he also connected the with wisdom and he wrote this, The Serpent represents intellect, the faculty by which man discriminates. There is a higher and a lower intellect. Thus, symbolically, there is a serpent that crawls and the higher intellect, that which allows man to know God, the heavenly serpent, the serpent in the sky, unquote. The somewhat veiled worship of this serpent in the sky Inside the Masonic Lodges was alluded to by another Masonic writer, Kenneth McKenzie. For in his book entitled The Royal Masonic Cyclopedia, he wrote this, quote, among the charges preferred against the order of Knights Templar for which Jacques Dimalay suffered martyrdom was that of worshiping an idol or image called Baphomet. It has been suggested that Baphomet is none other than the Ancient of Days, our Creator. More cannot be said here without improperly revealing what we, meaning the Masons, are bound to heal, conceal and never reveal, So, according to this Mason, the snake or serpent is somehow a symbol of the subject of the masonic worship. And apparently, this fact is the secret that the Masons cannot reveal to the rest of the world. A Christian minister, Reverend Alexander Hislop wrote a book that included some discussion on the subject of serpent worship. And in that book entitled 2 Babylons, he explained that serpent worship was not something that is recent in time. It was an ancient practice. Quote, along with the sun, this symbol will be discussed later As the great fire god and in due time identified with him was the serpent worshiped. In the mythology of the primitive world, the serpent is universally the symbol of the sun. As the sun was the great enlightener of the physical world, So the serpent was held to have been the great enlightener of the spiritual by giving mankind the knowledge of good and evil, unquote. And according to the bible, you know who gave man the knowledge of good and evil, Satan, Lucifer. He then discussed a coin minted in Tyre, the center of the ancient Phoenician culture. This coin was also the subject of an article in the September 1986 issue of the Good News magazine. It depicted a serpent entwined around a tree stump. To the left of the stump stood an empty cornucopia and to the right, a flourishing palm tree. The snake on the coin is the symbol of the powerful god whom the Romans called Aesculopius. The name means the man instructing snake or the snake that instructs man, and the article then reported quote, in mythology, Aesculapius was believed to be the child of the sun and thus the enlightener of mankind. As the legend goes, Aesculapius was ultimately struck down by a thunderbolt thrown by an angry Zeus, king of the gods and cast into the underworld, Unquote. The tree stump folks represented the fallen god and his ruined kingdom. In the mythologies of many ancient civilizations, the image of a fallen tree was used to symbolize the cutting off of a great god or hero, someone cut off in the midst of their power. You see, the snake on the coin was shown twisting itself around the dead stump, exerting its power in an attempt to restore his fallen kingdom. The cornucopia is an ancient symbol of plenty, but it was empty on the coin. This has been interpreted as meaning that the abundance had been cut off because the great God has been cut off. However, folks, the implication is that the horn of plenty will return when the fallen god is is restored to his rightful position. The palm tree shown in the coin is a well known symbol of victory. So it appears that the coin was minted to depict the anticipated return of the fallen snake god to the world. And the bible talks about a fallen serpent in the book of Revelation chapter 12 verse 9. However, In this case, folks, the snake is connected to another symbol of the serpent, a great dragon. Is the serpent worshiped in the ancient mysteries and a symbol in the Masonic ceremonies, a symbol of Satan, the devil? As has already been discussed, there is indeed evidence folks that this is the case. And once you have Confronted the evidence and studied as much as I have studied, you will know that they are 1 and the same. Another symbol that needs to be analyzed is the star. On the page opposite Page 124 in Mackie's encyclopedia is a drawing illustrating the symbols of Freemasonry. Included in the 20 or so Masonic symbols is a drawing of a shooting star. Now, it can be fairly claimed that a blazing or shooting star would be one that was on the move inside the universe. One of the directions it could move would be, of course, towards the earth. If it was moving towards the earth, it could be called a falling star. But we know that most falling stars are actually meteors, not stars at all. Lucifer, however, is a fallen angel according to Isaiah, An Old Testament prophet who wrote this in Isaiah chapter 14 verse 12, quote, how art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, Now folks notice that Isaiah also said that Lucifer fell from heaven, And other parts of the Bible report that he fell to the earth. So it is conceivable that the symbol of the falling or blazing star could be a symbol A variety of authors have used their writings to discuss the star as a symbol. Professor Adam Weishaupt, The founder of the Bavarian Illuminati was one who explained what he considered the star to be a symbol of. Listen closely. Quote, The flaming star is the torch of reason, unquote. Mr. Mackey wrote that the star, quote, was a symbol of God, unquote. He then connected the blazing star to another symbol when he wrote, quote, the blazing star refers us to the sun, unquote. And then he connected it with the secret initiation ceremonies inside the Masonic Lodge. Quote, In the 4th degree of the same right, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, the blazing star is again said to be a symbol of the light of divine providence pointing out the way of truth, unquote. And mister Hutchins, the masonic writer, who has authored the recent book on masonry, further The symbol of the star thusly, quote, the star as a type of the Myriad suns that light other countless systems of worlds is an emblem of that masonic light in search of which every mason travels, The correct knowledge of the deity and of his laws that control the universe, unquote. Now closely allied with the symbol of the star is the symbol of the sun. Albert Pike identified it with the worship of the past in this collection of quotes from his writings and pay close attention. Quote, The worship of the sun became the basis of all the religions of antiquity, unquote. Quote, 1000 of years ago, men worshiped the sun. Originally, they looked beyond the orb to the invisible god. They personified him as Brahma, Amun, Osiris, Baal, Adonis, Malcharth, Mithras, and Apollo, Krishna is the Hindu sun god, unquote. The Gauls worshiped the sun under the name of Belen or Belenis. The sun is the ancient symbol of the life giving in generative power of the deity. The sun was his manifestation and visible image, unquote. Quote, The sun is the hieroglyphical sign of truth because it is the source of light, unquote. So mister Pike identified the sun as a symbol of a deity that should be worshiped. He chose to capitalize the first letter in the word, the s, As one would in recognizing the name of a deity. And if you've been listening to this series, you already know That, of course, it was. Albert Mackey repeated Mr. Pike's contentions with comments like these about sun worship. Quote. It was the oldest and by far the most prevalent of all the ancient religions. Eusebius says that the Phoenicians and the Egyptians were the first to ascribe divinity to the sun. Hardly any of the symbols of masonry are more important in their signification, are more extensive in their application than the sun as the source of material light. It minds the mason of that intellectual light of which he is in constant search. The sun is then presented to us in masonry, first as a symbol of light, but then more emphatically as a symbol of sovereign Authority. So folks, the sun was a symbol of something that only the believers the religion known as the ancient mysteries understood. These believers called adepts certainly knew that the people would not accept Their mystery religion, so they had to conceal it from them. So the task became one of creating a religion around a belief that they knew the people would accept Because it would make some sense at least as far as the adepts would explain it. But their basic purpose was to create a popular religion as a cover for their secret worship. The secret religion would be built around a belief in the sun. The sun would be a perfect thing to build a religion around because of its basic nature. It is very visible And as a very important role in man's life, it rises in the morning, it appears to be born and then sets during the evening, it appears to die and then appears to be born again the next morning. It also appears to wander in the sky, Setting further north or south each night, it then returns back to any given position twice each year. So the sun appears to have a major birth or death twice each day and twice each year. It would, of course, be very easy for the adepts to explain to the people that only something bigger than mankind, a God, had the ability to die and come back to life. So the adepts would teach the people that they had to pray to the god or would choose not To return. They encouraged a worship of the sun so that it would return to mankind again either once a day or once every 6 months. Albert Pike confirmed this view with this explanation of why early man worshiped the sun. To them, meaning early man, the journeyings of the sun were voluntary and not mechanical. So early man considered the sun to be something that moved voluntarily. In other words, the sun did not have to return each morning. Man must have quickly determined that since the sun did not have to return, man should start asking it to return. For man certainly depended upon the son for his life. Man certainly must have figured out just how important the sun was to his life and well-being, and he certainly must have determined that if the sun chose not to return, All of mankind would certainly perish. So it was an easy jump from a belief that the necessary sun was an entity that chose But folks, there's something even more interesting to be considered that Pike didn't explain with that comment. Obviously, to make the new religion work, the believers would have to be able to predict the movements of the sun. It wouldn't be too long before some of the common people would start noticing that the sun was neither an actual being nor a god to be worshiped, But something that moved according to precise laws. Now, if the common people figured that out, They would not need the adepts who had computed the sun's periodic cycles. So to keep their power intact, they would teach the people that if they did not accommodate their wishes, they would make certain that the sun did not return. They could even predict as their measurements became more indicated the exact time and date when the moon would go between the sun and the earth, causing the sun to disappear. They could then fool the people into believing that they were the cause of the disappearance. They could then, of course, explain to the people that if they did not continue to pay them sort of tribute, they would not intercede in their behalf, and the son would not reappear. To keep the minds of the common people, the sheeple, Away from figuring out that the whole religion was a scam, the adepts would conduct beautiful and ornate ceremonies around the worship of the sun, and they would expect the people to pay them for the elaborate rituals. And to make their rituals valid, The adepts would always claim that the sun obeyed their prayers, thereby convincing the people of their need to keep the adepts around. The people, I mean, the sheeple would continue to pay tribute to these adepts as long as they appeared to be successful. Now folks, if the adepts knew that the sun was a symbol of something that the people would not court such as a belief that Lucifer, the devil, was the god that they worshiped, they would have to continue with their charade so that the People would not decide to stop worshiping because if the people figured it out, they would no longer support their activities. They would have to keep their beliefs from the people and conceal their secret worship in hidden symbols. So sun worship as a religion prospered. Mister Hutchins discussed that position in his book. And I also discussed it in mine, behold a pale horse. Mister Hutchins says this, quote, In the tabernacle, the brethren clothed in black mourn Osiris who is representative of the sun, of light, of life, of good and beauty. They reflect upon the way the earth may again be gladdened by his presence. Mr. Pike Connected the sun to Osiris mentioned by mister Hutchins as worthy of being mourned. Quote, the 3 lights at the altar inside the Masonic temple represent Osiris, Isis and Horus. Osiris was represented by the sun. Mister Mackey went a little further and informed his readers that quote, Osiris was the sun, unquote. In his book entitled introduction to freemasonry, Carl h Clouty, the author himself a Mason, connected the sun worship with the ceremonies inside the masonic lodge. Quote, the lodge sets him, meaning the initiate, upon the path that leads to light. But it is for him to travel the winding path to the symbolic east, unquote. The physical sun rises in the east and the Masons explained that their search for light begins in the east And notice that mister Cloudy capitalizes the word east, apparently in reverence to the spot where they believe that this god resides. The Masons tell the world that they circumambulate defined as walking around The temple floor during their initiation ceremonies. Mr. Clougherty explains why this rite is performed. Quote, when the candidate first circles the lodge room about altar. He walks step by step with a 1,000 shades of men who have thus worshiped the most high by humble imitation. Thus thought of circumambulation is no longer a mere parade, but a ceremony of significance linking all who take part in it with the spiritual aspirations of a dim and distant past, unquote. And it is a historical fact that the Knights Templar also performed the circumambulation of their temples. And he further instructs his readers as to why this ceremony is part of their ceremony. Quote, Early man circled altars on which burned the fire, which was his god, from east to west by way of the south. Notice that the north is not included in the ceremony. The significance of that omission will be discussed later. But circumambulation became a part of all religious observances, unquote. In another part of his book entitled Introduction to Freemasonry, Mr. Clouty reported that this style of walking was traceable to the ancient religions of the past. And he wrote this, quote, circumambulation was the ceremonies of ancient Egypt, unquote. So this practice of the modern Masons is based upon the ancient pagan religious practices of the ancients. So the Masons are telling us that early man walked around in a Circle because he was worshiping the sun, then they tell us that they are doing it for the same reason. There are reasons that the North as a location to be visited in their walk around the temple floor is not included in their initiation rights, and 6 of the great masonic writers have told us why this is so. Captain William Morgan offered his readers this explanation with this comment from his book, The writing of which he was murdered for. Quote, we therefore masonically term the North a place of darkness. Mister Mackey confirmed that statement in his book, quote, the North is masonically called a place of darkness. And Mr. Pike confirmed the comments made by the other 2 Masons with this declaration. To all Masons, the north has immediately been the place of darkness and of the great lights of the lodge, none is in the north. And Kenneth McKenzie added his confirming thoughts. Quote, the north was always esteemed a place of darkness, unquote. Mister Hutchins became the 5th masonic rider to confirm this detail. As he said this quote, As in other degrees, the closing ritual provides a summary of the lessons taught in the degree. We hear in the West, the eagles gather and the doom of tyranny is near. In the South, truth struggles against error and oppression. In the North, fanaticism and intolerance won. In the East, The people begin to know their rights and to be conscious of their dignity and that the sun's rays will soon smite the summits of the mountains. Mr. Hutchins informed his readers that the North was where Fanaticism and intolerance resided. What he meant by this and what the symbol of the North represents will be explored later. And the 6th masonic writer who confirmed that the North was a place of darkness was Carl Clougherty, who wrote in his book entitled Introduction to Freemasonry, quote, The Place of Darkness, And the reason the Masons do not include the North and their rights is found in the bible in the bible. The reason the Masons do not include the North and their rights is found in the bible in Isaiah chapter 14 verse 13. Quote, I, meaning Lucifer, will exalt my throne above the stars of God. I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation in the sides of the North, unquote. The god of the bible sits in the North And Lucifer hopes one day to acquire the throne of God for his throne. But until then, the North is a place of darkness. But while the north is an excluded territory, the east is the place of light and is to be revered, Albert Mackey quotes Etienne Francois Bazotte, a French masonic writer in his encyclopedia, quote, the veneration which the Masons have for the east There's a relation to the primitive religion whose first degeneration was sun worship, unquote. Rex Hutchins then tells his readers that the Masons deploy lights around the lodge room during the initiation ceremony for the 25th degree called the night of the sun and he writes, The ceiling should be decorated to represent the heavens with the moon, The principal planets in the constellations, Taurus and Orion, a single powerful light, a great globe of glass representing the sun is in the South. In a physical sense, the greater light comes from the sun and the transparencies provide lesser light. Symbolically, the sun, our great light is the truth and the lesser lights are man's symbolic representation of truth. Mister Mackey further discusses this right of circumambulation as he calls it in his encyclopedia. He says that the right quote, exists in freemasonry. The people always walked 3 times round the altar while singing a sacred hymn. In making this procession, great care was taken to move in imitation of the course of the sun, unquote. He then assisted the reader with understanding this practice in the Masonic temples. This right of circumambulation undoubtedly refers to the doctrine of sun worship. However, in another of the books that he wrote, Mr. Mackey directly states that the right is connected to sun worship. This is what he wrote in a book entitled, Manual of the Lodge. The circumambulation among the pagan nations referred to the great doctrines of Savvyism is defined by mister Mackey in his encyclopedia as quote, savviesm, the worship of the sun, moon and STARS, the host of heaven. It was practiced in Persia, Chaldea, India and other oriental countries At an early period in the world's history, unquote. He then added this rather cryptic comment, Quote, and although the dogma of sun worship does not of course exist in Freemasonry, we find an allusion to it in the rite of circumambulation, which Which it preserves. Now one can understand what Mr. Mackey meant by that comment. The Masons do not worship the sun. They worship the sun with a capital s. So he was telling the truth, but concealing it in a symbolic Language for he wrote SUN with a small s. You have to understand the symbology of the mystery schools or you will never understand anything, dear listeners. Mr. Hutchins then volunteered the information that in the 12th of the 32 degrees, the right of circumambulation is preserved and he writes, In all the Scottish Rite degrees thus far, the candidate has made 21 prescribed circuits around the altar. This degree adds 7 for a total of 28 and this practice called circumambulation is derived from the ancients and existed among the Romans, Semites, Hindus and others. It is thought to have been a rite of purification. The sun was believed to travel around the earth. The initiates imitated the movement of the sun when they made the circuits around the altar. Furthermore, dear listeners in the 9th degree, other symbols of the sun are involved in the ceremony. And Mr. Hutchins tells his readers, Quote, after the obligation is taken, the 9 candles of yellow wax are lit. Yellow is representative of the sun, hence light and knowledge. In the 10th degree, further symbols representing the sun are utilized according to this author. Quote, There are 3 sets of 5 lights. The wax is yellow, meaning knowledge and also as the color of the sun represents the deity, A blatant admission that the sun represents the deity that they worship. Other clues that the sun and the serpent are both known symbols of the Masonic Lodge are given by the titles of 2 of the 32nd degrees inside the Masonic Lodge. The 25th degree initiate is called a night of the brazen serpent And the 28th degree initiate is called a Night of the Sun with a capital S. There is another symbol of the sun inside the masonic lodge, the worshipful master. The equivalent of the president of the lodge sits in the east side of the temple, and we are told why that is. Quote, the worshipful master represents the sun at its rising. The senior warden, another officer of the lodge, represents the sun at its setting. And the junior warden, still another officer of the Lodge, represents the sun at Meridian, the halfway point, the most high. Other individuals and organizations besides the Masonic Lodges are also involved, folks in various Varying degrees with sun worship are with an acknowledgment that the sun plays a central role in their understanding of the nature of the world. Elizabeth Clare Prophet has been described as being a leader in the New Age Movement, and she has written This in a newsletter she publishes called the coming revolution. Quote, the healing of the nations begins with the healing of ourselves. We must draw forth from the great central sun that eternal light with which we were anointed from the beginning, unquote. Adolf Hitler, I'm sure you've heard of him. The head of the German government prior to and during World War and who was directly responsible for the murder of over 50,000,000 people was also a sun worshiper. Very early in his life, he joined a secret organization called the Thule Society. And 40 years after the war, some historians Finally delving into its strange beliefs. 2 of these writers, Michael Bertrand and Gene Angelini have produced a book entitled, The occult in the Third Reich and one of their conclusions is quote, in the Nazi cosmology, The sun played a prime role as a sacred symbol of the Aryans in contrast to the feminine and magical symbolism of the moon Revered by the Semitic peoples, unquote. The Nazi Party was the name of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, the party that Mr. Hitler joined. It became the controlling party of the German government prior to and during the war. The Fuhrer, German for leader in this case meaning Mr. Hitler, saw in the Jewish people with their black hair and swarthy complexion, the dark side of the human species. While the blonde and blue eyed Aryans constituted the light side of humanity. Hitler undertook to extirpate, meaning to eliminate from the material world, its impure elements to lead it back to glory. But sun worship, as the masons point out, is not new. The bible talks about it as well. Folks, Ezekiel was an old world testament prophet writing sometime during the period of 571 to 592 BC. And he tells about how he was taken by god to see a practice occurring near the temple. This is what he wrote in Ezekiel chapter 8 verses 15 and 16. Quote, And he, the lord god, brought me into the inner court of the lord's house and behold, at the door of the temple of the lord between the porch And the altar were about 5 20 men with their backs toward the temple of the Lord and they worshiped the sun toward the east, unquote. And Ezekiel points out that the lord god considered this practice an abomination. There is another reference to sun worship in the old testament. This time in Deuteronomy chapter 17 verses 2 through 4 and then verse 7, And that reference reads as follows. Quote, if there be found among you, man or woman, That hath gone and served other gods and worshiped then either the sun or moon or any of the host of heaven And it be true that such an abomination is wrought in Israel, so thou shalt put the evil away from among you, Unquote. So folks, the God of the Bible has made it perfectly clear that sun worship is something that he does not want. He does not want his creatures practicing this. The bible even went so far as to say in both instances that he considered the practice to be an abomination or an evil. But to show just how far this practice has invaded the Christian community, The following prayer was offered up at a recent funeral in a local Christian church. Quote, Now you will feel no rain for your mother, the earth, will fold her arms around you. Now you will feel no cold for your father, the Sun will always warm you. Sun worship continues Because some Christian churches pray to the sun god in their church services and don't understand who they are praying to. Simply stated. Simply stated, dear listeners, the sun god that they were praying to is Lucifer. Lucifer, also known as Satan or the devil, wakes you up, doesn't it? See, all the time, you thought religion was something stupid, didn't have anything to do with overall world events, but you're wrong. Has everything to do with everything. Whether you believe it or not, whether I believe it or not, doesn't make any difference. If the people who have the power and are in control, believe it, it will affect us all. Understand that because that's true. Good night, and God bless each and every one of you. Speaker 1: Lucifer, what is your problem? Speaker 2: Just that, Sir. Okay. I'm a Christian, sir. Speaker 1: I'm pure and virtuous and wholesome and innocent. How can you say anything about me. Speaker 2: Sir, you need to be born again. Speaker 1: I am born again. Speaker 2: Is that Now did you just say that you were Lucifer? I am Lucifer. K. Define Lucifer for me. Speaker 1: Pure, Virtuous, wholesome, innocent individual that's out to help people. Lucifer is? Yeah. Speaker 2: Luz say that again. Is a pure, holy Virtuous. Virtuous. Now see the Lucifer that god created? Speaker 1: That's the same one. Oh, man. Speaker 2: This is great. I'm gonna put this on the Internet. Speaker 1: God bless you, brother. Speaker 2: Because that's exactly what the Shriners and Masons teach, is that Lucifer Lucifer is light. No. And you're talking Speaker 1: to our hospitals. Speaker 2: You know what, sir? Jesus said many will say to me on that day, Lord, Lord, did not we did not do these good deeds in your name. You'll say, away from me, you workers of iniquity. I never knew you. Jesus did it? In Matthew chapter 5. Mercy. Now Speaker 1: That's hard to believe. Speaker 2: So you're a Christian, and you don't know that? Actually Speaker 1: I really am. Speaker 2: You are? Because I'm pure and You're perfutuous. Okay. Yeah. Mhmm. In other words, you're perfect without Jesus. Right? Speaker 1: No. No. No. No. Speaker 2: Okay. Tell me about Jesus. Who is Jesus? Speaker 1: Right. He's he's my leader. Speaker 2: Is he the son of god? Yes. Is he the only worshipful master? Yes. Have you ever been called worshipful master? Speaker 1: No. Because I I've just been too busy. I've been working Working. Working to help people. What kind Speaker 2: of work? You got it. See, this is what a mason confesses is that Lucifer is light.
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 4:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Beliefs stem from tradition, teachers, culture, family, popularity, and laziness. Knowing the truth differs from believing it. Money was created for fair exchange, but power-seekers manipulate words to deceive. Words hold immense power, constructing knowledge or spreading lies. We're enslaved by others' lies and our own ignorance. The Federal Reserve's deception ends with ETHGate. Let freedom prevail. Join the revolution. #digitalassetbuy #JohnEDeaton1 #Ripple #NerdNationUnbox #GEdwardGriffin #WeThePeople #Freedom.

@KuwlShow - Rob Cunningham | KUWL.show

To all my curious @X neighbors, and #XRPArmy family, WHY do we believe what we believe? Tradition? Teachers? Culture? Family? Popularity? Laziness? We understand there is a HUGE difference between “believing” something to be true & “knowing” something to be true. Fact: money was created to be a Trust System for a fair exchange of value between people. Fact: power seeking word perverts have forever defiled definitions and redefined words for THEIR benefit by deceiving the world into accepting THEIR narratives. Fact: spoken/written words are the most powerful weapons on earth. They can construct our knowledge and deceive us into believing lies. Fact: we are enslaved by the lies of others, the lies we accept, and the lies we tell ourselves. Fact: we are enslaved by our lack of KNOWLEDGE - not by our lack of beliefs or opinions. Fact: power seeking charlatans substituted OUR U.S. Treasury for THEIR Federal Reserve Cartel, and constructed the most elaborate, deceptive crock of legalisms, theories, economic constructs & “rules” in the history of mankind. We live in the Cartel’s Word Jungle, one that enslaves us all by our ignorance of THEIR lies. Welcome to the Revolution. The Federal Reserve is dead. #ETHGate ends them for good. Let freedom ring. @digitalassetbuy @JohnEDeaton1 @Ripple @NerdNationUnbox @GEdward_Griffin #WeThePeople #Freedom

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Federal Reserve is not a government agency, but rather a banking cartel that has the power of government enforcement. They created their own rules and regulations to self-regulate their industry, similar to other cartels like those in bananas, oil, or sugar. They presented these regulations to Congress as the Federal Reserve Act, giving the appearance of a government agency. However, if you don't follow their rules, you can go to prison. In essence, the Federal Reserve is a banking cartel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's describing here how they created the Federal Reserve Cartel. Listen. Well, you asked the question in your book, creature from Jekyll Island. What is the Federal Reserve? And what is your answer? Well, what it is, it's a cartel. It it's not a government agency. It has the appearance of it being a government agency, they went to great lengths to give it that that facade. It does have the power of government because congress voted to give the power of of enforcement to it. But in its essence, underneath it, it's a cartel. It's nothing different than a banana cartel or an oil cartel or sugar cartel. It happens to be a banking cartel. Money they got together. They drew up the rules and regulations for their own industry to self regulate their own industry. Self regulate. Remember that word now. Self regulate their own industry. Cartels do, and then they send it to congress, and they took off the the label at the top that said banking cartel may erase that. And they said Federal Reserve Act. Congress passed it into law, and that's why we think it's a government agency is because if you don't obey the rules that they set down for their own industry, you go to prison. So it looks like a government agency. But, basically, the answer to your question is it's a banking
Saved - September 24, 2023 at 6:09 AM

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

The Secret Rulers of the World Full Documentary H/T @wideawake_media

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a conspiracy theory that a group of powerful individuals, including bankers and media moguls, control the world from a secret location called Bohemian Grove. They are said to plan the creation of a new world order and engage in ritualistic activities, including the burning of an effigy. Alex Jones, a talk show host, attempts to infiltrate the grove and secretly film these activities. He believes that the elite members of Bohemian Grove are part of a satanic cult. However, some people, like Harry Shearer, believe that the rituals are just harmless traditions. The truth remains unclear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That we shall present in this program. Speaker 1: There is a conspiracy theory that a shadowy elite of bankers and media moguls are ruling the world from inside a secret room. They say that the people that control this world could Speaker 2: sit around 1 large table and have lunch. Speaker 1: The theory goes that these elitists plan to create an all powerful new world order, a world government that will destroy anyone who disobeys them. The theory spreads through the Internet and underground videos and anti New World Order talk shows. Speaker 0: Is there a new world order? There's a new world order. Is there a new religion coming? The religion's coming. The new world odor has a certain smell about it, the smell of death. Speaker 1: But there's something else. These shadowy elitists, men like Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller are rumored to attend a bizarre annual summer camp in Northern California called Bohemian Grove. This is the story of 1 man's attempt to infiltrate and secretly film inside Bohemian Grove. For years, conspiracy theorists like David Icke have traveled the world spreading the word about Bohemian Grove to a disbelieving public. Speaker 3: Now, Behind these trees, every year in July, the elite, the president's past, present, and future, the, media owners, the bankers, As the, business leaders turn up for a summer camp at Bohemian Grove. I took these pictures myself as near as I could get, So no through road there. You you get you get up and you eventually become to Bohemian Grove, some way up there. I've never been that far. Now, here's a picture from Bohemian Grove Taken in 1957, look over here. We have uncle Ron. I guess in 1957, he's still getting on and off his horse. Over here, tricky dicky, Richard Nixon. Here they are in Bohemian Grove, and both go on To become president of the United States. Now here's another picture from Bohemian Grove taken by on a long lens. What you're looking at during this summer camp is a ritual in which the elite of the world, They dress up in long gowns with, like, hoods on. Now, what we got here? A 40 foot stone owl. Go back in the ancient world. They used to sacrifice children to a deity us. Called Moloch or Molech. Today, these elite names are still doing ritual us. Sacrifices of children, so we ask the question, how do they symbolize Moloch Moloch as an owl? Speaker 1: Could any of this actually be true? David Icke is far from alone in believing that the root of all satanic, elitist evil lies inside Bohemian Grove. The rumors have spread across America. The flames fanned in conspiracy talk shows. Speaker 2: You see, for over a 120 plus years in Northern California, in Sonoma County, On a 2,700 acre secluded Redwood Grove, leaders from around the world, prime ministers, chancellors, Presidents, governors travel there to engage in bizarre ancient Canaanite Luciferian, Babylon mystery religion ceremonies. Speaker 1: But now, for the first time in history, one man intends to discover, once and for all, what they're really doing in there. His plan is to infiltrate Bohemian Grove in the dead of night and secretly filmed their owl burning ritual. His name is Alex Jones. Speaker 2: From his Central Texas command center, deep behind a enemy lines, the information war continues. It's Alex Jones and the GCN Radio Network. No longer Is the new world order some foggy apparition over the next hill, the talk of extremist us. In the rural areas, yes. The media has tried to make jokes of it. They've tried to create their little stereotypes. Now they openly speak of it in the senate. You will have globalism. We will disarm the American people. Speaker 1: Alex is a syndicated talk show host from Austin, Texas. He broadcasts from his bedroom down an ISDN line to 8,000,000 listeners. Alex believes that the shadowy elite at Bohemian Grove are the puppet masters who control the world's governments, banks, the media and the United Nations. Speaker 2: And you say, well, people aren't gonna accept that. Oh, well, how could the Aztecs accept sacrificing 10,000 people on some holidays, eating their children's hearts? This is all real, and we see Decadent empires in their final stages of corruption as they become insane throughout history, engaging in mass murder when it doesn't even help their final cause. Speaker 4: Us. Well, Alex, at 26 years old, is now syndicated to over 40 commercial markets. So he's huge, not to to mention that he's on shortwave and the Internet. He's been number 1 on AOL, you know, numerous times. Last year, he won best of Austin, which is a big honor in this city. Alex is Is a sensation in what he does. I think he's a new sensation because he's young, he's vibrant, and he's, reaching so many people. And so many people are Getting involved with this movement through what Alex does. Speaker 1: It's April 19th, 3 months before Alex's planned infiltration of Bohemian Grove. It was 7 years ago today that David Koresh's Branch Davidian church in Waco went up in flames. Alex has organized the rebuilding of the church, and he's emceeing the opening ceremony. Speaker 2: We're going to a little suit shop, pick up all my suits. Speaker 5: Oh, that's server. Hello? Speaker 2: How are you doing? Alex Jones. I'm here to pick up a suit. Wanna try it on? Yeah. That's great. Let me try it. Speaker 6: I've listened to your voice on numerous occasions. Speaker 2: Nice to meet you, sir. Speaker 6: Nice to meet Speaker 5: you to you to you Speaker 1: there. Well, he's got Speaker 6: some opinions that are, not us. Mainstream to say the least, and it's enjoyable listening to it. Yeah. Not that I agree with everything he says, mind you. Speaker 2: But Yeah. He wouldn't be able to sleep at Speaker 5: night. Exactly. Right. Speaker 6: Right. Because I I don't wanna be that, nervous about my life. Although according to you, I should be. Speaker 2: You're beautiful, my love. Isn't my girlfriend, Violet Nichols, beautiful and smart? Look at her. Look at her. She is just incredibly smart. That's the webmaster of infowars.com. Speaker 1: April 19th is a holy day for conspiracy theorists. They say that the elitists, The kind of men who attend Bohemian Grove commanded the American government to murder 83 people at Waco on this day and a 168 people 2 years to the day later. They say that the Oklahoma bomb was planted by the government themselves, an elitist plot to implement emergency powers to disarm and enslave the American people. Speaker 2: So the people of America have come together and built this memorial church out in the middle of nowhere, nine and a half miles east of Waco, Texas. And it's historic. It's us. 19th, and, they can have their big phony celebration and memorial for those that died at Oklahoma City. I'm sad they died. I'm also sad the government destroyed that building, And I was attempting to, blame it on good decent people by myself. It's disgusting. It's a Reichstagian event. My friends, just like old a step where Bernard and the Reichstag. Speaker 7: He is hard nosed. He's hard boiled. He's tender. His name is Alex Jones. Us. What's amazing is that this man is only 26 years old. Considering what he has accomplished us. Demonstrated in building this church. I believe that by age 36, he could become the youngest us. The president of the United States is Barack Jones. Speaker 2: Victory is out of order against the new world order, Against the communist and socialist and the bankers that run the whole filthy show. And now that they run the world or at least the central hubs of power The bank establishment's the dominant media. They plan to sack this country. Are you gonna let them No. Feel your ancestors? These individuals again were testing you, testing you back in 93, testing you for the World Trade Center, with Waco, and then in 95 with Oklahoma, Trying to scare you, run you off the cliff like a bunch of lemmings, but some Americans aren't lemmings. God bless you. Speaker 1: Alex and his cameraman, Mike Hanson, make underground videos in which they confront the people they feel are complicit in this great conspiracy. Speaker 2: I'm sick and tired of hearing your lies when you machine gun a bunch of men, women, and children. You got a big problem, buddy. Let me tell you, a lot of people are writing down your names. You can follow people around. You can harass people. You can back up your bankster buddies. But a revolution of peaceful information's coming. And when it comes time, you people are gonna be brought to punishment. You understand? Just like Nuremberg, just taking orders doesn't cut it, my friend. Do you understand me? Speaker 1: I think I've assessed you. Speaker 2: Yeah. Oh, you've assessed us. Listen. You can sit there and say some kind of little joke. You can assess me all day. I want you to assess me. I've assessed you, a smiley face slime ball us. Sits here in soft petals and tries to placate the media. Speaker 1: But Alex's planned infiltration of Bohemian Grove will be his most daring mission of all, and he said I was welcome to come along and film his attempts. I didn't know whether men like Henry Kissinger and George w Bush really dress in robes and attend a secret owl burning ceremony in the forests of Northern California, a ceremony said to be called the cremation of care. It was hard to believe that Alex was intent on discovering the truth. Speaker 2: It's my redcoat friend. Speaker 5: How are you? How are Speaker 2: you guys doing? Sorry. We're late. Speaker 8: So are you? Speaker 1: Are you excited? Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Speaker 8: I, I really want Speaker 2: to check into some maps and things, and I'm willing. I mean, Hiking into 2,700 acres is not too hard. We need Speaker 1: we need to get into the woods. We need to Speaker 2: insert ourselves. We need to catch these people with their business. Speaker 4: Gotta be very quiet. Let's go. Speaker 2: Oh, they're spies, aren't they? Speaker 1: Come on. Let's go Speaker 9: There's a lady up there. We're literally with a Speaker 2: ear like that listening to us, and another guy around up there. So I don't know what's us. Come on. View of them now. This is all kind of new for me. All the childhood fears, all of the superstitions plus the lay of the land, it's kind of like a little visit to America's us. Transylvania, we're in search of these what are they, cultists, weirdos, just big business or is it just a rich man's us. Camping retreat like they claim it is. And frankly with all the secrecy and all these big names and the admission that they do this us. Cremation of care for now over 112 years. And then I start researching that and I find out that it does have serious occult implications linked in the past to child us. Back in the ancient world, throwing children inside the burning innards of the owl. You start going, this is weird. Speaker 10: I sure wish we'd have brought a gun. Speaker 1: Then why would you want to bring a gun? Speaker 2: Because as they say, people disappeared from here. Speaker 1: Some conspiracy theorists are not at all surprised that American presidents might undertake these rituals at Bohemian Grove. They say these men are Satanists and that the evidence is there for all to see if you know how to look. They say the proof is even on the back of the dollar bill. Speaker 0: And you're a pastor, Del. What does secular mean to we Christians? It means without God. Exactly. So what this symbol is, What it relates to us and and its purpose when it was placed on the back of the dollar bill in 1933 was to announce the birth Of the satanic new world order under the all seeing eye of Satan, Lucifer, the devil, the antichrist, The man who will leave the world, whose number is 666. Speaker 1: Some things are known. The owl ceremony, the cremation of care, always takes place on the 2nd weekend in July. Visitors to the Grove in recent years have included Presidents Bush And Reagan and Ford and Nixon, movie stars like Clint Eastwood and Danny Glover and Alan Greenspan of the Federal Reserve. It is an all male affair. Alex has no clear idea how to accomplish his mission. He's managed to obtain a map of the grove, and his planning to enter the forest, perhaps climb up some mountains, and basically just scout around until he finds it. Speaker 2: Okay. Here's the big question. What farmers or ranchers living here who are gonna blow my blow my ass off by seeing me smoking across? Because I have no problem. There's a road. If I can be shown a way to insert myself into this with Hanson. Alright. I'll be alright. The only thing I'm worried about is Violet. Honey, do you wanna go with us? We're we're sneaking in this thing, and then I could, like a, like a mother hen, Just have you hang out at the edge of the woods while I sneak up closer. Speaker 4: You have a gun for me? I'm hoping to protect myself as I will, but I'm not gonna stay out in the middle of the woods. But I'm happy to come along. I mean, as long as we really have a plan. Speaker 2: Why don't you stay here then? Because there's no way to hide your beautiful femininity, from the Goblins. So here we have the 2,700 acres in the relatively smaller This is what 5 500 acres of actual campground. And God only knows what's really going on out here, In the larger areas, I would guess they probably created roads and trails off when they do their more nasty or beastly activities. Speaker 1: You're worried for Alex, Alex. Speaker 4: Because Alex gets so impassioned by what he's doing that sometimes I'm afraid that he might be a little bit, you know, reckless. But he's He's a brave man. I wish he had a gun, you know, with him. I wish that we were able to carry guns or to be armed or protect ourselves as well. Speaker 1: Alex has one positive plan. A local lawyer called Rick has successfully infiltrated the grove on two occasions. He's agreed to meet Alex tonight to offer him tips on how to get in. Speaker 8: I don't know what this lawyer is gonna Speaker 1: want when we what mannerisms Speaker 5: or demeanor he thinks will get us Speaker 2: in there and not, us. Or demeanor he thinks will get us in there and not, and will keep us from being noticed. But frankly, these cameras, we could sneak around the woods all us. I long, I need to catch these guys and come up on their campsites while they're enjoying themselves, to get it all. Speaker 1: There were a few hours to kill before our meeting with Rick, the lawyer, so we split up and I visited Mary Moore. Mary lives a few miles from the camp. She protested Bohemian Grove every summer for 3 decades, holding up placards, yelling at the warmongers cruising past in their limousines. But now she's 65 and retired. Speaker 11: A piece for the eyes in here. Speaker 1: This is the office? Speaker 11: No. The place. This is the sixties room. This is where all the sixties oh, who killed JFK Kaye and Speaker 1: Is it dangerous to try and get into the Bahini and grove? Speaker 11: Well, if you get caught. I mean, us. In terms of your life, no. I don't think so. But if you get god. You probably get arrested. I think they just quietly make them go away. Speaker 1: There's some people out there who say that they quietly make them go away in a more sinister manner. Speaker 11: Oh, well, you know, there's a lot of stuff, especially, like, a lot of right wing stuff and all that. Oh, we've had, they're killing children up there and sacrificing them on the altar. We've heard that one a lot. I guess you have too. Us. You know, I don't know. Maybe they are. But if that was happening, I think we would know that here locally. I think It's bad enough to just stick with what they're doing to the globe and the Earth and to the people on it. Speaker 1: Mary told me some strange things about the grove. The reports have a great deal of alfresco urination against the redwood trees, even though the campsite is equipped with many toilets. Then there are the lakeside talks, as the unofficial power meetings that occur in an open air theater. Speaker 11: This is where the ruling class bonding happens. That's us. Oh, they network. So, you know, who they meet up at the Grove and what they talk about. Certainly, that's why the Lakeside Talks are so important because that's It's kind of your preview of what's gonna be the issue. Star Wars was discussed up there long before it became out into the public consciousness. So that's where the Manhattan was conceived in 1942. So it's it's sort of the germination of a lot of this, and it's without public scrutiny. It's it's us. Basically, the way they do a lot of things, cocktail parties, going away into the back rooms, it's just kind of the ultimate back room. You know? Speaker 1: It's a secret room. Yeah. Is it true that the Manhattan project, which gave birth to the 1st US atomic bomb, was nurtured at the Grove. Is it true that the future of the world is discussed there by men like Henry Kissinger, who can change the course of history, men who actively thrive on secrecy, hence the mystique that has grown around any secret society Kissinger belongs to, especially if it undertakes baroque ceremonies involving our lethargies. This is Rick, the lawyer, who's agreed to tell Alex what he knows about Bohemian Grove. Rick is not Speaker 5: a conspiracy theorist. Speaker 1: He infiltrated the city theorist. He infiltrated the place simply because he was curious. He'd heard so much local gossip about the grove. It was my idea to introduce Alex to Rick. It was Mary who told me about him. Speaker 2: Tomorrow, what us. What time do they, have the cremation of care or the owl ceremony? That's typically right Speaker 10: at right us. Dusk. It'll start when it's still sort of light out, and by the time it's over, it's dark. Speaker 2: Have you ever witnessed that? Speaker 1: Mhmm. Yeah. Speaker 5: And what Speaker 8: do they do? Just Speaker 10: There's a real large it looks like probably a redwood tree that was cut off, and then they built things on Top of that, that get you know, that the fire goes up and they do all these things, and then there's sort of a, I suppose, a Druid type of ceremonial altar out in front of They do things at, ceremonial altar. Well, it you know, it has that it has that look about it. Very old, very pagan. So, basically, Well, you would come in. Speaker 2: I wanna get this absolutely concrete. Speaker 1: Are you still thinking about going by the train? Speaker 2: Well, now that That's why I wanted to talk to him. These are those big hills we're talking about. You're gonna have cliffs and all types of stuff that would be Speaker 10: Coming in this way would you could kill itself, especially if you go out that way. But, of course, if you came this way, you could just walk out that way. Speaker 1: The surprising news from Rick is that the secret to successfully a threatening bohemian groves not via the mountains nor navigating the nearby Russian river, but to just walk in up the front drive, right past the security guards. Speaker 10: I would just walk in here. There are going to be 1 or 2 guys sitting by the the Side of this road, in a camp chair, looking bored and uninterested. And you're just gonna say, just nod to them As you walk in, that's it. Speaker 1: Now what about clothes? How would you get in? Speaker 10: I'd walk in wearing this shirt and a pair of khakis, and I've and I've I just walk in from Monterrey. Speaker 2: Could could be because Speaker 1: You us. You know, preppy clothes. Speaker 8: Yeah. Preppy. It's a preppy club. Speaker 10: Jeans on the fly. I'm trying to Remember whether or not I've seen people wearing jeans. You're gonna blend in better with with khakis, casual, cotton pants than you would with jeans. Don't have to wear a cap. Really? It's not necessary. But on the other hand, if you do wear 1, nobody's gonna pay any attention to it. Speaker 2: What about me wearing flip flops or something Speaker 10: or or sandals? Sandals would be fine. Flip flops might not be us. Speaker 2: Yeah. Sandals. Speaker 10: Sandals, you know, running shoes, us. Loafers, you know. Alright. I would guess that what you don't do is you don't stand out. Certainly, the certainly, the crowd at The Grove is Even the ones who are in their twenties, probably, and those are fairly rare, they don't dress young. Speaker 2: So, basically, you would come in. I wanna get this absolutely concrete. This us. We'll go there. Speaker 1: Yeah. And let's take a drive down. Speaker 10: This not a true road, which is Bohemian Avenue, Yes. Where are you walking? Speaker 1: Even though Rick seemed to me a trustworthy adviser, Alex was still unsure. Rick's tip seems so contrary to everything we'd heard about Bohemian Grove. How could Alex just walk in? That seemed incorrect. Speaker 2: Now you think you can trust Speaker 5: him? Mhmm. Speaker 2: Well Mhmm. Speaker 8: Yeah. We'll be the judges. Speaker 2: I'm not gonna end up with it I'm not us. Tied down a pentagram with with, Henry Kissinger's fat belly hanging over me while he's naked with a big dagger, am I? Bush governor Bush running around in a pink tutu us. At the mouth with a purple wig on, am I? Speaker 5: No. Speaker 1: Do you think that Alex's temperament is such that he'll be able to maintain the stealth needed to take his operation. Speaker 4: Well, I think Alex is, not only a great activist and a great broadcaster, he's also a great actor. So as long as he's able to think of what he's doing as Acting like he has to infiltrate as a, you know, guy carrying a golf bag and be brave. Speaker 1: And you're definitely not dangerous. You're not do anything stupid this weekend? Well, Speaker 2: I mean, dangerous to what? Dangerous to myself? Are these people dangerous? They certainly may be, but I'm I'm completely nonviolent it comes to just going out there and trying to get the information, that's what I'm trying to do. Speaker 8: You need to clear this up. He said, are you dangerous? You know, the thing is, you're not us. Danger, you're defending the freedom for our children, our grandchildren. You need Speaker 2: to clear that up for Speaker 8: the camera because that was kind of you know, he's not dangerous. But it's a difference between being dangerous and protecting your Freedom. Speaker 1: I just wanted to make sure that you weren't gonna actually push any of them in the river or further them into the Speaker 2: No. I I See most of these most of these elitist individuals, these snobs, I see them as pathetic. And this is really a a gross analogy, but I'll use it. When I see a whole bunch of dog turds being laid all over the society, I don't run around stomping on them because I don't wanna get it on my feet. I just said I say to the general public, let's let's clean these up, and and let's tell these people they can't do this anymore, that they can't shit on us. That's That's really what I'm saying. You can't shit on us anymore. I just want to stop shitting on us. Speaker 1: It's the next morning. Alex has decided to take Rick's advice and buy preppy clothes even though he admitted to me off camera that he suspects Rick might be part of some complex trap to capture him and offer him up as a sacrifice to the owl god. I'd spent so long with Alex that all the paranoia was rubbing off on me, and those same crazy thoughts were beginning to cross my mind about Rick. Speaker 4: Us. I think this is perfect. Eddie Bauer is perfect. Speaker 1: I can't help thinking that Alex has become suspicious of me for introducing him to Rick. Might I also to be part of some elaborate plot. Speaker 2: Right? Yeah. Sure. So guys, what preppy shirt do you think I ought to wear? I mean, these are some of the shirts I brought. Speaker 8: Like that? Speaker 2: Like that us. No. I I wanna get their opinions. Step over, Mike, for a second. Thank you. So you like this app, so you wanna apply in the Speaker 4: us. Alexa Hansen. Speaker 2: And there's this hat. Speaker 8: Let me try that one. Speaker 4: Let Speaker 2: me see that one. Speaker 5: No. Yeah. Us. Alright. Speaker 2: I think this is it, probably. This is the hat. Speaker 3: No. That's good. Speaker 2: See? This is the This is kinda something they wear. I'm sure tell her you've seen photos of her wearing hats like this. Speaker 4: That's us. Speaker 1: Are you there? Speaker 2: Yeah. I am. Because if I was Just jumping off a road and hiking in there secretly, it'd be I'll be a lot less nervous, but I'm gonna try to try to just, Walk right past him. Speaker 1: What changed your mind? Why why do you no longer wanna go, over the hill? Speaker 2: Well, when we talked to Rick yesterday, he made it sound so Easy. Hey. Speaker 5: You Speaker 11: want me to say Speaker 4: how it works? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 4: So, basically, you just click it once. Speaker 5: It's Speaker 4: gonna vibrate us. Three times. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 4: Feel it. Speaker 2: Oh, if Speaker 8: it does that, we're in trouble. Speaker 4: It's feeding back. Speaker 1: That shouldn't giveaway. Right? Speaker 4: Obviously, you don't want it to do that. Right? No. Well, I'm here. Us. Because that does jank if it does that. Speaker 1: Later that afternoon, Alex and Mike discussed contingency plans, things to say as a last resort in case their cover's blown. Speaker 2: We know our cover's blown. They'll just keep saying, hey, and we're going, and say, no, no, no. Alright. Well, we'll be over here. And then just nicely start walking away from it. They start following us. Just say, listen, you better get away from me. Now I'll feel the choice words and then we'll just get in the woods, Get away for a few minutes and then come back out. We'll never know. Speaker 1: You better get away from me. That sounds like a threat. Speaker 5: I don't Speaker 1: think you should be pressing me now. Speaker 2: No. I'm a tell them to get away from me, But it's not gonna be a problem because we're gonna be slick. There's not gonna be any problems. Speaker 1: But don't say you better get away from me or else. I mean, that's Speaker 2: No. It's not Speaker 1: a preppy talk. Speaker 2: Oh, they're definitely not. Speaker 1: And then, as a final preparation, Alex and Mike practice being preppy by having appropriately preppy conversations. Speaker 2: We're just gonna walk normally as we would, calmly, la la la. There's gonna be guys us. We're, you know, we're fat cats, so let's go ahead. But, seriously, David, as fast as microprocessors are us. Starting to move. It's getting down to a molecular level. The question is, at what level will just the actual basics of science stop us for making these these systems smaller. And I'm it's the entire nanotechnology revolution that I find to be most a static. Speaker 8: I agree. Would you like that? Yeah. Well, you'll That's all we did last time. Speaker 1: You're trying to say I agree. I Speaker 2: don't know. It's just gonna Speaker 8: be natural when we do it. I'm not gonna I don't think we should practice, you know, conversations. I think we should just do it. Speaker 2: What comes Comes up. Thank you. Yeah. Speaker 1: Here we go. K. Speaker 9: Go ahead. But I Speaker 2: really wanna know your opinion of nanotechnology. I mean, you've been studying it so closely. We've already got These transistors down to the size of molecules, the question is when will the science, just the basic laws, Stop our progress in the miniaturization process, Speaker 10: doctor. Speaker 1: Are you sure you don't Speaker 2: us. Well, here we go. The moment us. The truth. Speaker 5: We're driving down. It's a Speaker 8: Saturday night, Speaker 5: here in Occidental, Speaker 2: and the Bohemian Grove is between Occidental, and us. And Monterrey are both small towns. You know, we're gonna try to just infiltrate by just acting as if we're members of The Grove walking straight through. We've assumed fake names. Mike, of course, is David Hancock. Yeah. And I'm, Mike Like Richardson. Speaker 8: What do you do for a living, Mike? Speaker 2: I don't think that's been decided yet. Speaker 8: Yeah. We better decide that us. I'm a documentary I'm a documentary Speaker 2: filmmaker, which is true. Us. And, we'll just say that, Mike is also, in the media. Mike is a writer. Oh. He's the famous state. Writer, David Hancock, whoever that is. Speaker 8: What if somebody has some of the book titles? So, Mike, don't hesitate. David a city. The Blue Lagoon. The Black Lou the Blue Hancock. The Black Lagoon. I wrote that in 1984. It was my first one. That's right. You're David Hancock. I'm Mike Richardson. David Hancock. Mike Richardson. Speaker 4: So what's the plan? I'm to come pick you up at 11? What if you're not there at 11? Speaker 8: Us. We're not there at 11. Go hang out for about 30 minutes. Drive around, come back at 11:30. If I'm not there at Speaker 2: 12, us. Speaker 8: Check the motel. Speaker 4: Do you have a watch? Speaker 8: We can ask people. Speaker 2: It's no problem. Speaker 4: And if you don't turn up, what am I supposed to do? Speaker 8: If we're not around by Speaker 11: us. Good morning. Speaker 4: Yeah. Pretty big window. Speaker 8: Should we sit up all night? Speaker 2: Folks, you know we're flying by the seat of our pants right in the middle of the forest. Speaker 8: We'll be asleep under trees and we're flying Speaker 2: it's just words. Just, baby, come out there. Us. Look for the bread crumbs. Speaker 4: Okay. When do I get in touch with the police or whatever if you guys don't come back? Tomorrow. Tomorrow in the morning? Yeah. Speaker 2: Us. Speaker 4: Like, after 6 AM? Yeah. Be careful. Speaker 2: I'll be careful, baby. It's no big deal. Okay. I just wanna get this pagan ritual, Well, and we're out Speaker 5: of here. Speaker 1: Be careful. Speaker 8: Pray for Speaker 1: It is at this moment that Alex and Mike, for no apparent reason, suddenly changed their plan. Instead of walking up the drive if as Rick had recommended. They died frantically into the undergrowth at the side of the roads. These are the first ever images from inside Bohemian Grove, covertly filmed by Mike with a miniature camera concealed inside a fake pager strapped to his belt. Speaker 2: Us. We're actually not inside yet. Don't mind? Speaker 5: We're in Speaker 2: the parking lot. Yeah. Speaker 1: Us. I had no idea what Alex and Mike might find inside the grove. The rumors sounded just unbelievable. All I knew about the ceremony was what Mary Moore had told me earlier back in her cabin. Speaker 11: And here's where they're taking me in handcuffs, and they're taking us away. And here's the cremation of care picture. Speaker 1: How come you managed to get a picture of it? That's one of Speaker 11: the Things we got from inside one of our deep throats. They they have postcards. Speaker 1: And they burn an owl? Speaker 11: They burn an owl. It's a 40 foot stone owl. And they don't us. Actually burn the owl. They burn a cremation of keros, just a bunch of rags soaked in gasoline, and it's symbolic, and they set it across the river. Speaker 1: And what does us. Mean cremating them? Speaker 11: Well, they say it means that they have the cares of the world on their shoulders. And therefore, to let their hair down, have a vacation, they have to cremate care. Us. It's over a 100 years. They've done enough for about 117 years. Speaker 1: Dusk, as the Bohemians prepare for their owl burning ritual And as Alex and Mike mingle covertly with the elitist somewhere in the forest, there's nothing to do but sit and wait. Us. 1 AM, Alex and Mike return. They're as amazed as I am that it was so easy to sneak in without being by the security guards and the Secret Service. As incredible as it sounds, it seems that some kind of bizarre secret shawl witnessed by world leaders really does take place in the forests of Northern California. Speaker 2: We're standing in a big crowd of people, and they keep getting in front of us. And I'm trying to guess, holding this bag with this camera here, what's the best way to get Yao. See, look. Now you system. Speaker 4: Sideways. Speaker 2: It's just crooked. Sam? Speaker 1: Very crooked. Speaker 8: We're lucky nobody's ever got it out with that footage at all. Speaker 2: Yeah. The problem is we just improvise us, Cut a hole in the back and stuck the camera up in there. And we had to have the cameras stuck up right there, and I'd be standing there us. Going. Speaker 5: Like that. Getting the foot. Speaker 2: But it gets better because there's a lot of light later. And I thought Speaker 8: us. Thought us. Oh, be reverent before him. Lift up your heads, though ye trees, and be lifted up. Speaker 4: That's scary. City. I would have been terrified. People in the conclusion. Us. They're in black robes. Clown. They're terrifying. Speaker 1: You can do. Speaker 4: How bizarre is that? A bunch of old men in black robes in the middle of nowhere. Speaker 2: Yeah. Orange ones and solar ones. Speaker 5: Us. That is Speaker 4: a good video right there. Look at that. Speaker 8: Worshiping us like a al god. Is that what it was? Oh, yes. Speaker 2: Yeah. This is all pretty disgusting. Speaker 4: That's right. Speaker 5: Our funeral fire awaits the courts of us. Speaker 4: That's good. Speaker 1: Like, in a nutshell, do you think what you saw was not was unholy? Speaker 8: Well, it's very strange To me that these people are supposed to be running, the so called America and the world. Oh. Speaker 2: And they're Speaker 8: out there doing this. Speaker 5: By the Speaker 8: us. Yeah. You Speaker 1: seem you seem freaked out. Speaker 8: Oh, I am. Well, I get so tired of these people telling because we know the so good, and I know they're good people. And they they're saying these people are cults. This is a cult. Speaker 2: Mike is absolutely right though. These people will point their fingers all in, call people extremists or cult members or whatever for their religious beliefs. This was a pagan ceremony Worshipping the Earth and then engaging in human sacrifice. That is mock human sacrifice. Speaker 1: Are they just saying that for 2 weeks, we don't have to worry about anything? Speaker 2: Yeah. But they're also worshiping the great al god and burning someone in effigy and torturing them, and and as they're burned, they they know. State. I mean, you'll see it on on the day period. Speaker 1: But isn't they I mean, isn't Speaker 2: I mean, listen to these guys laughing behind us. I mean, you You hear all these old guys going, man in, man in. They're cheering Speaker 8: for this guy to be killed. They'll be sacked. Speaker 1: But they're not killing a person. Speaker 2: We understand that they're not literally killing a person, us. Speaker 5: But they're Speaker 1: But the other thing you've ever even are they sure they're not even killing None yes. Speaker 2: They're killing something. Yes. Now wait a minute. Wait a minute. You've got a black I mean, certainly, you saw it. You've got death right here. Look. Here's the boat. Look at it. Right there. You got death on this black boat bringing a a pallet with with with, like, a paper mache person, obviously. Speaker 7: You know, it's got The feet and the body and the and the head here under Speaker 2: the deal, and then they they take it over and they burn it. Speaker 8: Under a black Speaker 2: For some idol, for some owl Oh, god. That looks it really looks like a demon. It's got, like, horns up there. They just call it an owl. I mean Speaker 8: Whole place is full Speaker 1: of owl and statues and and us. What kind of thing? Speaker 8: It's just owls are everywhere. They're everywhere. They're like statues of owls everywhere. You're walking along, Speaker 2: and it's like 80 year old men peeing on trees and going, here, Let's pee, and then you see him pulling there and then peeing on a tree when there's a bathroom 5 feet away. Out in public, I mean, on concrete paved roads, asphalt roads. Here, let's pee. Sure, Bob. Speaker 8: And they're, like, showing everybody, uh-huh. I'm peeing on a tree. Speaker 2: It's running down the street. Speaker 4: Just as they could. Right? Speaker 8: Bringing fire. I'm not gonna us. I I was scared to death. And What do Speaker 1: you think might happen Speaker 5: about it? Speaker 4: Look at this. Speaker 2: I mean, we've Speaker 8: seen that. What happened? Well, we could have been 1 up on that boat. Us. Yeah. You don't know what these people have. These people are sick. Speaker 2: It's like bizarre, Luciferian garbage. Here we go. Speaker 1: This really screwed us. Speaker 11: What was that normal? Speaker 4: Us. Us. Surprise Speaker 5: to the stars. Speaker 1: But when again, you turn your faces to the marketplace. Speaker 5: Us. Here after year within this happy globe, our us. And they go to space. So shall we be once again this time? And us. Us. A state. Be gone, Bill Cairn. Fire shall Speaker 2: have its will of thee. Speaker 5: Once again, next summer sets Speaker 2: us. So the center's next president is George Bush Junior, is supposedly going out there next week, and His father admits he's been there many times. Speaker 8: We're supposed to be a Christian culture, and they're we're not we're worshiping a vile god. How do you think that would fly with America? Speaker 2: Yeah. You're not supposed to worship Jesus or something or anything else. It's it's worship the Al God. Speaker 4: Because it's bad. It's a Speaker 8: That's a big Speaker 5: a He Speaker 4: has faith. Speaker 8: That's a big rock. I've heard this talked about for years years years, but I've I've never saw any footage. I'm a Speaker 2: go home, guys. I'm out of here. Speaker 4: Hang on. No. Speaker 8: I'm going through. Speaker 2: Too tired, man. How do you get stopped on this? Speaker 4: Stop. Speaker 2: I'm too tired Sorry to go through this. It's just the middle of the night. Speaker 1: The next morning, Mike went to pray in the local church. I met him some hours later at to park down the road. Speaker 8: Well, I've heard these stories for years, being in the patriot community, and it's true. Speaker 1: What's proof. Speaker 8: They sacrificed a they sacrificed something to a Al god It's what I got out of it. Speaker 10: But what Speaker 1: weren't they just sacrificing all the troubles in the world for a 2 week holiday? Speaker 5: It's not Speaker 8: what I got out of it. Speaker 1: But wasn't it just a metaphor? Speaker 8: To me, it doesn't matter what it was. I know that that there's rituals that go on. Let's just take, for instance, April 19th, what happened At the Oklahoma City bombing and what happened at Waco April 19th, I think that's all part of it. That's my opinion that that's part of it. Us. I think they're sacrificing in the real world too. Speaker 1: Was this the new world order? Speaker 8: Yes. Definitely. I I look the new world order in the face out there. Speaker 1: Of course, all the Bohemian Grove attendees I approached for interviews declined, all that is except for 1. Harry Shearer is the voice of Mr. Burns in The Simpsons, And he plays the character of Derek Smalls in This Is Spinal Tap. Harry Shearer visited the grove on one occasion and agreed to tell me what she saw. How do you get to go skinny in the world? Speaker 9: A son of a member, I think was dispatched Attached to, oh, to be delicate about it drew the place up a little bit. So, I was There's no Jews? Well, Henry Kissinger is is reputed to be a Jew. One of the things that I love in a humorous way about the place is that they allow members of the San Francisco Symphony us. In the San Francisco Opera to be associate members and to live in in less luxurious surroundings, just to have people to play in the orchestra And to, you know, do the makeup for the shows, you know? Because they really take that show stuff seriously. I mean, that's one of the things that I think is is sort of great and silly about them. The theme we're really Seriously about the task of running the world in, secret conspiracy. I don't think they'd be doing so much drag. Speaker 11: Aren't they cute? Yeah. So Speaker 1: they just certain drag? Speaker 11: Well, they have to because they they put on plays, and there's no women up there. Speaker 1: So Speaker 11: They have to take the parts. And the place that we've gotten the feedback on, they're all very, very sexist. Very sexist. Speaker 9: You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to know that this is a get together of very powerful guys. The skies. Whatever it is they're doing there, whether they're running the world or just reliving their their adolescence, they're A self selected group of powerful white Christian Americans. I mean, I love the series because I I I do believe that they're these people are the only real good narrative writers left in the English language, you know? They to write really good compelling narratives, but I just don't happen to think they're true. Speaker 3: Today, these elite names are still Doing ritual sacrifices of children at Bohemian Grove. So we ask the question, how do they symbolize us. Is Moloch. Moloch as an owl, which is staggering considering this is what I discovered. It wasn't in the book. Us. I saw it as I was looking at the street plan of Washington. This is the Congress building and all I've done is draw a red line around us. Down the roads within the Congress complex, it is a quite obvious owl, but don't take my word for it. This next one, I have not even touched. It's a straight picture from a Washington Street directory, not only is congress building in the belly of the owl, it's standing Speaker 9: on On a pyramid. And they can keep you spellbound, you know? And you can imagine while I'm in New York, and they're giving me spellbound, imagine being isolated On a ranch in Montana with nobody except, you know, your son that you're teaching to shoot a rifle, this would be pretty amazing stuff coming through you coming through night to you. You know? Speaker 1: In the weeks that followed, Alex streamed his footage on his website and released it as a sell through video. It immediately became an underground blockbuster, a bestseller. Cellar. Everywhere I looked, the Internet was aflame with news of the daring rage. Speaker 2: First off, I wanted to draw your attention to the program that was us. Out to the spectators or the viewers. The figure of a human body burning us. In the flames. In fact, I've shown it, to people that are experts in anatomy. They say that the anatomical size is that of a baby or small child. Understand, ladies and gentlemen, this is from the program itself us. Given out to the establishment lackeys witnessing these sinister activities. Speaker 1: But some more mainstream Stream Americans were not convinced that the ceremony proved that the men at Bohemian Grove are devil worshipers. Speaker 9: If you've ever been Through a secret society in college, you know this stuff. You you can write it from from memory. It's just add Two zeros to the budget, and and you're doing what what, you did when you were 18 years old. Speaker 1: So it is a secret society, do you think? Speaker 8: Is it? Yeah. Speaker 5: Yeah. But, I Speaker 9: mean, it's a secret Society the way the secret society that I was inducted into at UCLA, in my senior year is a secret society. There's a lot of meaningless mumbo jumbo and people the the main conspiracy is to take is to take it seriously. You know, that's the real conspiracy is, okay, let's pretend we're not being absolutely silly. Speaker 1: I later learned that George Bush Sr. Attended the grove in the days following the cremation of care. Other visitors Cicero Grove in 2000, included Henry Kissinger and Vice President Dick Cheney. For Alex, the story wasn't over. Speaker 8: He had one final Speaker 1: task to accomplish. Final task to accomplish. Speaker 2: George Bush down here at the, governor's mansion across the street from the capitol about to announce Dick Cheney, as his vice Vice presidential running mate. We're gonna go blow the party for him and get the information out to people. Speaker 1: Although I considered Alex's footage to be incredible, I shared Harry Shearer's interpretation of what the ceremony meant. But who knows? Harry Shearer is a Hollywood Jew, a Jew in the media, just like I am. And for many conspiracy theorists, the Jews in the media are very much part of the shadowy elite. Speaker 5: This is how George Bush dresses up right here. We got him on tape. This is how George Bush Expresses. Right here when he's in the Bohemian room. He is nothing but a Luciferian twit. A Luciferian twit. Buss. Us. Speaker 1: It didn't matter what my interpretation was. Alex has 8,000,000 listeners. There are millions out there who, like Alex, absolutely believe that the men at Bohemian Grove are the satanic secret rulers of the world. Speaker 5: We have the radio today. This is a massive story. Us. What are the stories of the century? What are the stories of the century? Speaker 1: Alex's infiltration has made him a bigger star than ever, but he says he won't rest on his laurels. He says this is a war, and he won't stop until the new world order are wiped off the face to the Earth. Speaker 2: Damn it. I wish they just stopped. They've got enough power now. But it's the 6th stuff they come out with, the United Nations, we gotta reduce world population by 80%. Us. It's just how they want us. They want us surfs out there. Oh, you know, like your surfs over in, over in Britain, the peep my people that left to get, to get away us. Eating little turnips and and little onions they grew, and they're, like, a foot and a half shorter than the noblemen with their teeth hanging out as they ride us. I'd die on their horse. Oh, look at them. They're much better than them. That's their pleasure. No. Their pleasure. Well, I'm not gonna give them their pleasure. I'm gonna cram a a their mouth and see Speaker 5: how they like it because I'm free. That's been in my family history to fight, Speaker 2: and I'm not your slave. So get it straight, us. And we're ready. You can nerve gas us all day. We're ready to rock, Speaker 5: and the people are waking up because some of Speaker 2: us are willing to spill our blood for the sacrifice. You hear me, scum? Speaker 4: Sun. We're coming for you. Speaker 1: The Bohemian Club have written to us, refuting Alex Jones's allegations, as false. This is what they said.
Saved - June 14, 2024 at 8:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A comprehensive documentary revealing the "Illuminati" and hidden history. Topics include symbolism, transgenderism, liberalism, Hollywood, and the Catholic Church. The full show can be found on Rumble. Covers the downfall of America, WW2, and gay pride. Explores the individuals behind these events.

@zadokq244514 - Zadok 💫

New World Order Communism By The Backdoor The most comprehensive documentary that reveals the “Illuminati”.. Learn about symbolism, learn about hidden history.. Find out who’s behind transgenderism and the rise of liberalism… Twitter doesn’t allow me to upload the full show, a couple hours are cut.. Full show here on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v2yuwak-new-world-order-communism-by-the-backdoor.html #Lucifer #Satan #Occult #NewWorldOrder #LiberalWorldOrder #UnitedNations #PopeFrancis #Hollywood #BritneySpears #Beyonce #MoneyBaseFinance #Communism #History #illuminati #Leaked #Kalergi #Refugees #Immigration

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video covers a wide range of topics including the inaccuracy of measuring weight, blaming Jews for certain events, the rejection of Jesus by Jews, the Israeli government, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories, multiculturalism, the rise of neoconservatism, ancient architecture, the mysteries of Alexander the Great, the creation of a one world government, the influence of secret societies, the role of usury in society, the power of the Rothschild banking family, the manipulation of the media, extraterrestrial threats, the control of the United Nations, the loss of freedom, the potential enslavement of the masses, the persecution of certain groups throughout history, such as the Jews and the Germans, the suspension of the constitution, the control of energy resources, the impact of surveillance in the US, the dangers of microwaves and wireless technology, the influence of social media on totalitarianism, the manipulation of information on platforms like Wikipedia, the Iron Mountain report, global warming, the control of energy for power, the neoconservative movement, diversity in leadership roles, and the perception of America as the greatest country. The speakers express concerns about government control, misinformation, and the need for inclusivity and transparency. Throughout the video, the speaker expresses anti-Semitic and extremist views.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Which means if you take the weight that's supposed to be a 1000 gram and you put it in a precise electronic scale, very, very, precise scale, it's never going to be a 1000 gram, 999, 999,997. Over the years, the corners are rubbing off. It's 1 gram after 1 year, another gram after 2 years. After a few years, it may be 9.90 grams. But no customer care about this 1 or 2 grams. What is it? Another little piece of the cucumber? Nobody cares. It's a 1000 gram. A 1000 gram, 997. Fine. Let me go. Don't waste my time. This is what Hashem said. You are the wait for me. He is the little piece who fell on the floor that nobody care. And you wanna be him? Speaker 1: I mean, you've made this reference several times that that somehow the Jewish people are to blame for many of the things that occurring that are occurring in America. Or do I do I have that not correctly? Speaker 2: Yes. They are I think we have to hold Jews responsible for what they've done. So for example, the war the war in Iraq, it's they're they're responsible for it. Gay marriage is a Jewish project. Pornography has always been a Jewish project. All I'm saying is we have to hold this group responsible for the evil that they have done. Speaker 1: Now Why have they done it? Speaker 2: Because they're Jews, and its origin is at the foot of the cross. When Jesus Christ arrived on this earth, he came to God's chosen people, the Jews, and the Jews at this point had to decide whether they were going to accept him as the messiah or reject him. The Jews who accepted Jesus Christ as the Messiah are the true children of Abraham, and they are Christianity. The Jews who rejected him are now known as Jews. In rejecting him, they chose Barabbas. Now this is this is a decision that was had immense consequences for all of human history ever after that because in rejecting Jesus Christ, you are rejecting logos. This is the way Saint John, who spoke Greek, refers to Jesus Christ. Jesus is the logos. This is the order of the universe that was created by God as a mirror of the order of God's mind. And here, the logos is now incarnate in Jesus Christ, and these Jews, this group of Jews, rejects him and chooses a revolutionary in his stead, Barabbas. Well, what that happened is that the Jewish people have chosen revolution and rejection of logos ever since, and they've been a source of turmoil and disruption up to this present day. Speaker 3: Members of congress, I have the high privilege and distinct honor of presenting to you the prime minister of Israel, his excellency, Benjamin Netanyahu. Speaker 4: Yours is a voice of criticism we don't often hear in the United States. Often when there is dissent expressed in the United States against policies of the Israeli government, people here are called anti semitic. What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew? Speaker 5: Well, it's a trick. We always use it. When from Europe, somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the holocaust. It's very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts of the Israeli government as anti Semitic and to bring up the holocaust and the suffering of the Jewish people. And that's that is just defy everything we do to the Palestinians. Speaker 3: Hilderberg was founded by Nazis with the CIA and British intelligence at the end of World War 2 with a a plan to take over the world. Speaker 6: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world, But the story wasn't true. Speaker 7: How how Speaker 8: can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true. Speaker 0: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true. Speaker 9: So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death 5 of us. So, of course, everybody ignored the the Bob Wyatt from that on in. Then they punished us for every man that ran to the wire. They they took a 100 inmates. Speaker 10: I had Speaker 3: a uncle who was one of the, who was part of the first American troops to go into Auschwitz and liberate the concentration camps. And the story in our family was is that when he came home, he just went up into the into the attic, and he didn't leave the house for 6 months. Speaker 11: 1st, Obama didn't have an uncle who served in the US army. 2nd, Russian forces liberated the concentration camp in Poland in January of 1945. Speaker 12: The Jews, I call them Jews to you because they're known as Jews. I don't call them Jews. I refer to them as so called Jews because I know what they are, and I can prove that. The Eastern European Jew who form 92% of the world population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazar. They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia, and they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into Eastern Europe. And to reduce this so you don't get too confused about the history of Eastern Europe. They set up this big cazar kingdom, 800,000 square miles. Only there was no Russia. There were no other countries, and the Khazar Kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe. So big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the car guards would loan them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were. Now they were phallic worshipers. It was their religion, the way it was their religion of many other pagans or barbarians elsewhere in the world. Now the king became so with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so called monotheistic faith, either Christianity, Islam, Muslim faith, or what is known today as Judith, really founded it. So like spinning a top, he said eeny, meeny, miny, moe, and he kicked out so called Judas. And he opened a became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them that ever had an ancestor that ever put a toll in the Holy Land, not alone in Old Testament history, but back to time, the beginning of time. Not one of them. That is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Speaker 13: The whole thing, the whole Greater Israel plan, it it operates on 2 essential things. It's to survive, Israel must become the imperial regional power, and it must affect the division of the entire area around it into smaller states. They stir up sectarian hatred. They divide the whole place into smaller states, and then all these smaller states are fighting each other. And so that kind of legitimizes, Israel's existence because it it appears to be the only stable force in the area when it's the one who's gone and destabilize the whole thing. And what Chris said about the 2 stripes on the flag, this is exactly right, the Nile and the Euphrates. This is the plan for Greater Israel, and it includes Syria, it includes Jordan, it includes, the top of Saudi Arabia, half of Iraq, parts of Lebanon. This has been the plan for the whole time, and this is why they've gone in there and done things the way they have. It's all part of the Greater Israel project. And even there was another document that was called, Israel's Sacred Terrorism. It was written by a man called, Olivia, Rakesh, And it's, it's based on the memoirs of Moshe Sherat, former prime minister of Israel. And it it basically outlines the, 1978 invasion of Lebanon to a tee. It's exactly what they did, and it's kind of a smaller condensed version of this Yinon plan. And the Yinon plan was also outlined by, you know, way back as far as Theodore Hersl. I mean, this has been going on for a long time. Speaker 14: This scenario is born out by none other than prime minister David Ben Gurion, one of the great founders of Israel. Recorded in an astonishing article in Look Magazine, Ben Gurion predicted that a one world system presided over by Jerusalem will be set up in the near future. All continents will become united in a world alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more war. In Jerusalem, the United Nations, a truly United Nations, will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated union of all continents. Speaker 15: This will be the seat Speaker 14: of the Supreme Court of Mankind to settle all controversies among the federated continents as prophesied by Isaiah. Speaker 13: What we're dealing with here, like, when you look at the, the whole Khazar empire, that's who these people are. They're Khazars, and they basically hijacked everything. They've infiltrated into Christianity. They've infiltrated into Judaism. They've probably even infiltrated into Islam. Infiltrated into everything. This is where you got, Christian Zionists, you've got Jewish Zionists, you've got this whole sort of mottled empire that's sort of all over the world, it's infiltrated everywhere, and they're using basically the what's outlined, the supremacist ideology that's outlined in the Jewish faith. They're using this to construct their new world order. And these people believe they're the chosen people. The these Khazars are more zealous about following these these ideologies than the actual Jews are, but none of them actually believe in God. They're creating this whole tense situation empire of chaos with this this one empire of chaos with this this one bastion of control in the middle, which will be greater Israel. That's the plan. But it's run by by the Khazars. And I I would suggest that even the British Royal Family are probably related to these Khazars in some way. I mean, it all seems to go back to this empire. All the research that I've done over the years, going back through Hebrew lines and going back looking at what happened in Egypt and so many things, this this kazar history races on the planet together. This is why we've got such an infiltration of foreign races into Europe at the moment, which is all being run by by, Jewish advisers to all over his country. And it's it's weird. You say to stuff, no. You're blaming the Jews for it. You're anti semitic. Well, hang on. I'm just looking at the situation. And you look and you go, these people, they just happen to all be Jews. Is this a coincidence? And then you look at the Greater Israel Plan, and you look at the whole doctrine of the of the the Jews, that God's chosen, and the Goyim, and you say, well, here it all is. Sisi, he he's serving British and Israeli interests like Tilti. He's doing he's doing just as bad, even more damage to Gaza than Israel because these are Arab brothers. They should be supporting these people. And he's closed all the borders off like he says, he's bulldozed all those things. He can't even think of digging a moat as I was saying before along the books. So they can't possibly dig any tunnels because they'd have the weight of water above them. Them. There's no way they'd be able to do any smugglerless tunnels. Like I said, they're turning Gaza into a super maximum prison. It's, being done right in in front of the rest of the world. So CC is absolutely serving their interests. But I mean, Bashar Assad, I mean, I don't think he was installed. I think he he was kind of a reluctant leader. He came to power and, didn't really want to have the position that he's got. And his country has been devastated because he wouldn't bow to the Zionist control Speaker 7: system. Speaker 13: I mean, this whole ISIS thing, I mean, ISIS is sprung out of nowhere exactly when Israel needed it. It's it's paved the way for Western intervention to go and carpet bomb the whole Arab world. So I mean, who's controlling this? They're saying they're Muslim extremists. They're not Muslim extremists at all. They're killing Muslim people. They're killing women and children. All of these things that are banned by the Quran. They say if you do this, then you you go to hell for all eternity. So obviously, they're not religious extremists. They're just extremists. I mean, I would suggest that ISIS probably stands for Israeli's Secret Intelligence Services. It's is the new boogeyman because, Bin Laden had run out of steam, Al Qaeda had run out of steam. But ultimately, it's all a product of the West anyway. These are the same people that they had in in Libya, the same people in Speaker 7: Syria. Speaker 2: Follow the leads, put the troops in, and and play this. Look. ISIS got started through funding from our friends and allies. Speaker 3: So with the additional steps I ordered last month, we're speeding up training of ISL forces, including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar Province. So with the additional steps I ordered last month, we're speeding up training of ISOL forces, including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar Province. Speaker 16: If you look at the anti white proposition, there can be no all white countries anywhere, or there can be no all white areas in the formally all white countries. This is the anti white proposition. It doesn't matter if you go to France. It doesn't matter if you go to Germany. It doesn't matter if you go to America. You know, you've got all of these countries trying to make themselves non white, and this is happening, of course, in every white country, all white countries. No one's exempt from this Speaker 7: side. Speaker 16: And of course, it just doesn't happen that way. They just accidentally occur. Psychological warfare means war. It means someone it means there's there's planning. It doesn't it doesn't happen by accident. You can't have something like that without a plan. There has to be an agenda. You're not gonna accidentally try to make China non Chinese. Speaker 17: This idea of multiculturalism we see espouse today, so frequently from every facet of society, is not new. People would like to believe that it's new and those that don't seek to support it are old fashioned. No. This ideology goes back 1000 of years. It goes back to our history for a long, long time. And what it leads to is what you see in Babylon. No white people. A society gone. And we will end up the same way if we don't stop it. It's as simple as that. You know? History history can serve as a lesson for us, and this isn't new. And we're doing exactly what's been done Speaker 7: before. Speaker 18: Even if you expose them to authentic information, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logical behavior. He will refuse to believe it. The psychological shock when when they will see in future what the what the beautiful Society of Equality and Social Justice did. No one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. Speaker 19: So do you feel that you are British? Speaker 20: I identify myself as Muslim. If I if I was born in a in a stable, you know, I'm not gonna be a horse. I mean, this is just an island I was born in. Speaker 19: Ramesa and Chowdhury both live in East London, which is home to one of the largest Muslim populations in the UK. In one part of town, Ramesa and his associates have set up so called Sharia patrols to go out and discourage behavior that they deem un Islamic. But the patrols are not always so friendly. Online clips give a very different picture. A woman in a short skirt is abused. Speaker 7: Mary, it's Speaker 21: Great Britain. Speaker 7: At least we don't care. Speaker 20: It's not so Great Britain. Speaker 7: Get down for us to choose so far, sweet. Speaker 19: Walking through London with Ramesa, you experience an alternate reality where there is no compromise and all conversations are one-sided. Speaker 20: Ultimately, I want to see every single woman in this country coming from head to toe. I want to see the hand of the thief cuts. I want to see adult restored to death. I want to see Sharia law in Europe, and I wanna see it in America as well. I believe our patrols are a means to an end. Speaker 15: If we can't get them out, we'll beat them out. Speaker 22: In 1970, a United Nations resolution condemned Rhodesia and urged the world to supply moral and material assistance to Rhodesia's enemies operating out of Zambia to the north. When these Marxists suffered because they had cut themselves off from food, electricity, and jobs that they got from Rhodesia, the United States government sent aid to make up the difference. In 1976, secretary of state Henry Kissinger actually went to Zambia to promise such aid. The resulting new government in nation after nation submits to the socialistic one world system that is being built, and now South Africa. President Reagan, on September 9, 1985, sent the following official message to the Congress of the United States. I hereby report to the Congress that I have exercised my statutory authority to declare that the policies and actions of the government of South Africa constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy and economy of the United States and to declare a national emergency to deal with that threat. That's incredible. That's absolutely incredible. Well, of course, that led to the Anti Apartheid Act of 1986. It called for the unbanning of terrorist organizations such as the African National Congress and the release of what they called political prisoners with the name Nelson Mandela mentioned by name. Speaker 17: A memorial for all South Africa's white farmers who've been killed since apartheid ended in 1994. 3,338 murders in 16 years. That is one white farmer killed every 36 hours. Speaker 22: There are powerful forces in South Africa working in league with the 1 worlders and internationalists who are subverting independence wherever it exists, and helping communists wherever they operate. Speaker 2: The turning of black people into revolutionaries by outside groups took place during the entire course of 20th century. Beginning with the founding of the NAACP, we had what has been come to be known as the Black Jewish Alliance. This group of people used the situation in the South to radicalize black people, to turn them into the revolutionary avant garde that was intended to overthrow the government of the United States. Combination of this was the civil rights movement. The government got involved and began funding violent groups. Sergeant Shriver, ahead of the, the, one of the government offices of the war on poverty gave $1,000,000 to a gang in Chicago known as the Blackstone Rangers. What you have is the rise of this revolutionary spirit among the black group spread out throughout the black community. 67, Harold Crews, a professor of black studies at University of Michigan, writes a book called the Crisis of the Negro Intellectual in which he recounts his experience as a communist in Harlem. And he says, basically, the Jews used this. So for 70 years, the Jews were trying to turn the blacks in this country into revolutionaries. Then they succeeded finally with groups like the Black Panthers, which was a total Jewish creation. Ask David Horowitz about that. He was the guy who was the fundraiser for him, the famous neoconservative, Israel lobby guy now. They they succeeded in creating these black revolutionaries, and then the establishment says, well, we've had enough, and they go in and kill them. That was the end of the black panthers. Now that was 1969. 69 is the year of the Stonewall riots. So guess who the new revolutionary avant garde is, also supported by the Jews. The homosexual movement is the successor to the civil rights movement. Of course, there was a little interim called the feminist movement, but that was a black operation too simply to double the workforce and drive down wages. So now you have the homosexual as the avant garde also run by the Jews. We have vice president Joe Biden to thank for that. He gave a speech to a Jewish a number of Jewish organizations in which he thanked them for being behind gay marriage. It was embarrassing to the Jews, but Joe Biden said it. So, therefore, it's not anti Semitic to say that the Jews are behind gay marriage because Joe Biden said it, and he should know. He's vice president of the United States. Speaker 23: You could be forgiven for mistaken this toddler for a little girl, but 2 year old Max Price is actually a boy. Max's parents are raising him gender neutral, meaning they dress him in both boys and girls clothes. Speaker 24: He might be just playing dress up. It might be something he might still do in years to come, but at the end of the day, we're just following the way he wants to be. Speaker 23: At home in Walsall, West Midlands, Max plays with cars and dolls, And he is encouraged to wear trousers and dresses. Speaker 24: We listen to him very carefully. Speaker 23: Parents Lisa, 23 and Martin, 34, hope that Max will grow up having a better understanding of women. Speaker 25: A gender neutral restroom has been established in the White House complex. Located in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, the facility is accessible to staff and guests alike. Speaker 26: And do you think that Speaker 2: the country will see the first the United States will see the first gay president or the first woman president? Speaker 7: Have it Speaker 21: with Obama, so let's just calm down. Speaker 2: Got it. Speaker 21: No Michelle is a trans Speaker 2: I'm sorry. She's a what? Speaker 21: A transgender. Speaker 12: We all know. Speaker 3: Oh my gosh. Distinguished guests, men and women of the finest military in the world. Most of all, admiral Mullen, Deborah, Michael and I also wanna acknowledge, Speaker 27: Standing 7 feet tall, the design features Satan in the form of Baphomet. This goat headed being has wings and a beard, and he's surrounded by a pair of adoring children. Speaker 28: Their final destination. Ordinary German men and women stood here and applauding them. Extraordinary. People handing them water. Welcome to Germany. How do you feel? Speaker 29: CBN News went to Oslo. We went to investigate reports that that nation's experiment with Muslim immigration and multiculturalism had gone terribly wrong, that Muslim radicalism was growing along with violence and intimidation against non Muslims. Some on Norway's left call the fear of Islamization a conspiracy theory. But the victims of Islam are real, and they are mostly Norway's women. Something else that Muslim immigration appears to have brought to Norway is what some here call a rape epidemic. Recent police statistics showed that in the capital of Oslo, 100% of assault rates between strangers were committed by immigrant non western males, and 9 out of 10 of their victims were native Norwegian women. Some blonde Norwegian women have reportedly begun dyeing their hair black, and many travel only in groups. Speaker 30: White women of childbearing age are only 2% of the world's population. Speaker 31: Yet, we are encouraged to breed outside of our race Speaker 30: or forfeit having children altogether. Speaker 28: White women are attacked just for walking down the street. Speaker 31: 1 in 4 Swedish women will be raped in her lifetime, and she's not being raped by other Swedes. Speaker 32: Basically, the US is providing these flows for us. You will make war and we get the refugees. Speaker 33: So, Speaker 29: The United Nations report says Sweden will be a 3rd world nation in about 15 years below Libya and Bulgaria. Speaker 30: We are taught by Jewish feminists that motherhood is oppressive and that we need to leave the house to go work in a cubicle, a strip club, or wait tables for mindless consumers and serve anyone but our own family. Speaker 28: This is freedom from oppression. Speaker 34: The people are essentially asking the question, if the political establishment continues to get its way in 5, in 10, in 20 years time, how many Germans are gonna be left in Germany? How many French people are gonna be left in France? How many English people are gonna be left in England? Speaker 29: Test scores in Swedish schools are plummeting or if crime in some areas has skyrocketed. Speaker 24: I hope all of them and everyone else across Britain will reflect on the universal values that Ramadan represents and the contribution that British Muslims make to our country. Speaker 35: 1400 children over a period of 16 years. Children being raped, trafficked, beaten, and sometimes doused in petrol. All the perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage. Speaker 24: Ramadan Mubarak to you all. Speaker 36: London has got so ethnically diverse that white Britons are now a minority here. Speaker 24: White families in Birmingham are set to become a minority group for the first time. Speaker 23: The country's most rapidly growing demographic is Muslim. Speaker 36: With Mohammed now the most popular name for baby boys in London. Speaker 11: Victory in Europe, VE Day. Speaker 13: We may allow ourselves a brief period of rejoicing. Speaker 7: You used to Speaker 24: be a Trotskyist for a while. Speaker 37: So I knew what? Speaker 24: You were in the International Socialist, which for people who don't know is the forwardrunner of the Socialist Workers' Party. And this was more than a flirtation. You were a true believer. Speaker 7: For it. Speaker 37: Oh, very much so. Yeah. I thought that Marxists and Leninism have pretty much the answers to, the problems of the world. Yeah. Speaker 24: How do Speaker 7: you look Speaker 24: back at that now given what you Well, Speaker 37: it was a reasonable mistake to have made. Unlike people unlike people who've been vaccinated against the disease, I've actually had the disease, and therefore, I'm totally immune from it in a way that a mere vaccination couldn't possibly provide. Speaker 24: People again, you call yourself a moral and social conservative and unapologetically so, but you're not a Tory. In fact, you're very hostile to the modern Tories. Yeah. Why? Speaker 37: Because it calls itself the Conservative Party. If If it called itself the Socialist Workers' Party, it wouldn't have anything against it. Speaker 38: Much more in Speaker 37: common with the SWP than it has with the conservatives. Speaker 12: Do you think the, Speaker 33: I often hear David camera and Speaker 37: and George Osborne coming out with things which I used to say when I was a trot. Yeah. Speaker 33: But I often hear a daily camera and Speaker 37: and and George Osborne coming out with things which I used to say when I was a trot. Speaker 39: All the big companies have already had great success just gaining the system and taking away sovereignty by way of NAFTA. NAFTA is very weak where it comes to for a foreign entities right to come in and change the sovereign law. But already, we've seen the oil companies force people in Canada that said, you know, we don't want you drilling in our backyard. They've been forced. They've been sued, and the legislation that prevents that, that that drilling has been thrown to the side. Same way with fracking, same way with, pricing of pharmaceuticals. This is a complete, takeover of what we hold so dearly, and that's the right for us to be able to govern ourselves, Tom. Speaker 3: Call me, the FBI, the deputy director, Tom Brandon at ATF. We're gonna hire more folks to process applications faster, and we're gonna bring an outdated background check system to be 20%. Speaker 40: Every sheriff in these states told Obama, you come into our state and into our county, we will declare war on you. You send federal agents to disarm our constituents in our county, we will arrest you. I am one of the most avid anti communist in the United States of America because I understand the enemy. Not only who they are, but what they are, what they have done, and what they're planning to do. Now a lot of you may not like me, but you see, I don't care. I love America. I love the republic. Yes. And I know that Jewish communism is the internal enemy of We, the United States of America, and We, the People because the people smell a rat, and it's a 2 legged rat, and it's a 2 communist rat inside of America. Before you can really understand sometime what is really going on around you, you've got to go back into history, record harvest. They had so much food. They didn't know what to do with it. They had so much food. They didn't know what to do with it. But they couldn't have any because the Jews wouldn't let them eat it, and they starved 9 to 10,000,000 Ukrainians to death when they had food all around them. And if the Ukrainians tried to eat any, they were either clogged to death, bayoneted, or shot to death. And Stalin took the food and the other leaders, and they sold it on the world market to make money. If you wore a cross, you died. If you were caught with the bible, you were put to death. And then they even tried to force the white Christian Russians to speak Yiddish for 2 years trying to make it that language of white Russia. The Germans knew all about this secret holocaust, and they didn't want it to happen to them. And what happened in white Russia, the white Russians were partial Prussian German, and that was their ancestors that these Jews did it to. This was the greatest Holocaust that you can imagine, second only second only to the holocaust in the United States of 50,000,000 aborted babies, and they are planning the same identical overthrow and genocide in the United States as they did against the white Christian Russians in 1917, but they just haven't got the gun yet. Lock in the road. Suck it up. We have an enemy in the land, and they will not take this nation. So help me, god. Speaker 32: Well, some of you are aware of this famous book, Tragedy and Hope, written by Georgetown professor, Carol Quigley, way back in 1966. Carol Quigley wrote this 1300 page book, and he told us in his book that he was aware of a secret society whose purpose was to rule the world, and that its agents in the United States with the Council on Foreign Relations. Toward the end of his book, Carol Quigley said this, the 2 parties should be almost identical so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Now I'm sure many of you in this audience realize that you can change from Democrat to Republican and back to Democrat and back to Republican and there's no change. So what Quigley wanted to see happen has happened. And the ones who were able to do that to the Republican party was a neoconservative. So what is a neoconservative? Well, here's a man who's happily accepted the title of godfather of neo conservatism, Irving Kristoff. He accepted the New Deal of Franklin Roosevelt, and that's socialism. Massive government creation creation of government departments, euros, agencies, and it deepened the depression in the 19 thirties, the new deal. But this man was in favor of that. How and why did neoconservatism get started? They said with the nomination of George McGovern signified that the Democratic Party was not hospitable to any degree of neoconservatism in 72. Only a few of us drew the obvious conclusion that we would have to try to find a home in the Republican Party, but with every passing year, our numbers grew. I regard myself lucky to have been a young Trotskyite, and I have not one single bitter memory. Trotskyite. Right? Who's Trotsky? Well, when Lenin seized control of Russia in 1917, he had a partner, his name was Trotsky. And Trotsky is just as much a criminal as Lenin ever was. Lenin died in 1924, and then Trotsky and Stalin were teammates. So Trotsky and Lenin worked together and Trotsky and Stalin, and they had a fallout. He was exiled by Stalin in 1927, and he ended up in Mexico where he was slain by one of Stalin's agents with an axe through his head. Okay. So the neoconservative movement is socialism, internationalism, Speaker 12: and. Speaker 32: This was formed after the election in 1992 when George h w Bush, the older Bush, was beaten. And his top assistants, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, had already decided after having engineered the first attack on Saddam Hussein, They wanted to do it again, but they weren't able to do that because Papa Bush lost the election to Bill Clinton. Okay. So the project of the new American century was formed during the Clinton administration by these people. So the path to war. So out of office in 93, they formed the PNAC. They petitioned Clinton and Gingrich who was then speaker of the house to invade Iraq. Well, Clinton got himself tied up with some, personal matters. Speaker 41: I am looking forward to the opportunity in the next few days of testifying. I will do so completely and truthfully. I am anxious to do it, but I hope you can understand why in the interim, I can and should have no further comment on these matters. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Are you standing by your public statement on Monica Lewinsky, mister president? Speaker 42: Wasn't able to do it. Speaker 32: So George W. Bush became president in 2001. He selected neocons, Cheney, and Rumsfeld as his topmost assistant. They said that we must use US power to meet global responsibilities, strengthen ties to allies, challenge regimes, hostile to our values. They urged the invasion of Iraq before 9 11. Speaker 3: Holy shit, man. Speaker 7: That's the other building. That's terrorists. Speaker 3: Other building? That's terrorists, bro. Speaker 32: Ram Emmanuel said a crisis is a terrible thing to waste. He obtained authorization to invade Afghanistan and Iraq from the United Nations. He started forcing US values on other peoples and other nations. Speaker 40: Either you're with us, either you love freedom and with nations which embrace freedom, or you're with the enemy. There's no in between. There's no in between. There's no in between. Speaker 32: Prominent neoconservatives who hold membership in the Council on Foreign Relations. Dick Cheney, Paul Oakwood, Charles Krauthammer, Elliot Abrams, Newt Gingrich, under Lisa Rice, Henry Kissinger, Robert Kagan, Rupert Murdoch, John McCain, John Bolton. World government, all neoconservatives want world government. They may have minor disagreements among themselves, but they all favor continued US subservience to the United tonight, I wanna talk Speaker 1: to you about neoconservatism and their rise to power and virtual take over US foreign policy. Speaker 2: Most Jews were communist in the 19 thirties. Most Jews lived in New York City at that time. Most of the Jews, at that point went to City College in New York. And we have the famous story of alcove a at the lunchroom there, which was the Stalinist, and Irving Kristol was part of alcove b and the Trotskyites. And so our story begins pretty much in the 19 seventies. We had, Watergate and then following Watergate, which was a coup d'etat that got rid of Richard Nixon. And during this period of time, we also had the end of the fall of Vietnam. And so we had a widespread sense of disillusionment, in the country and a widespread sense that somehow the America's foreign policy had gotten out of control, specifically because of the CIA. And, so Jimmy Carter, decided to capitalize this on this and make it the the issue of his, presidential campaign. And it succeeded, and he got elected. He was elected in 1976. And in 1977, he decided that he's going to clean house, perpetrates what we what came to be known as the Halloween massacre. The Carter administration's attempt to bring the CIA under control. The result of this was anywhere between 802,000 rogue CIA agents, also known as cowboys, were basically fired. George H. W. Bush is one of the cowboys, and he's out of power. And so what he we what he tries to do is basically regroup his forces, get those people together now, and work for the overthrow of Jimmy Carter. Part of this vendetta against, the remaining CIA was a plan to undermine all of the CIA's intelligence reports. The the the the history of, post World War 2 America, also known as the Cold War, is the history of peace threatening to break out and people rushing to make sure that doesn't happen. The the cowboys, have lost their jobs. They need to regenerate the CIA. They need to put it back on the cutting edge, and so they need a threat. And the CIA, at this point, the people who are left who are doing the real intelligence reports are simply saying no. It's there's no threat. George Bush arranged at this point was he wanted another opinion. And the name of the group that was to give him the other opinion was called team b, and team b were the neoconservatives under the direction of Richard Pipes, the Harvard professor. And they came up with a statement that was a preposterous exaggeration of the Soviet military threat at the time because the Cold War was starting to sputter out under Jimmy Carter. Got their foothold in the in the government by becoming part of team b. This was their beachhead in power in Washington. This was their beachhead. Let's say late 78, the demonstrations in Tehran are getting more and more insistent and they're getting bloodier by the moment. The Ayatollah Khomeini absolutely hates Jimmy Carter. And so the Bush, Bush wants to be president, and he's gonna use the CIA cowboys to get him elected president. But, you know, it's not in the cards. And so as, you know, 79 turns into 80, it looks as if ronald reagan's gonna be the guy David rockefeller is the one who through Kissinger, who was his the Rockefeller asset, persuaded Carter to let the shot into the country. The Shah needs a place to live. He's dying of cancer. Jimmy Carter allows him to come to the United States. At that point, the Iranian students storm the embassy in, in Tehran, take over the embassy and hold, a 150 some Americans hostage. This is in November of 1979. So the Ayatollah is collaborating with the CIA here at this point to drive Jimmy Carter from office, which happens. The CIA and delivered I think it's $24,000,000. The guy had told his government took the money from Bush, and they prolonged it for the money and because they hated Jimmy Carter. What they were thinking, I mean, they were crazy because, you know, it's like jumping from the frying pan into the fire. You think Jimmy Carter's bad. Wait till George Bush and Ronald Reagan take over the White House. And then there's that great moment when and Ronald Reagan gives his his inaugural address, and he says, free those hostages. And within 15 minutes, they were as if he had sometime what what power this man had? How did he do that from all the way over there? The Americans promise we'll never interfere in in your internal affairs again. Well, that's that was, wasn't even worth the paper it was written on because within 1 year, they had, goaded, Saddam Hussein into attacking Iran. There's a picture on the web of, Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein. You know? The Americans are gonna send the poison gas, which they will then use as a pretext for invading Iraq in 2003. This is total hypocrisy. And then, of course, they lured him into Kuwait, and then that was the excuse to this big coalition to attack and remove Saddam Hussein. But the important thing, you know, from our perspective was the rogue CIA is back in ballot. Irving Kristol and the neoconservatives remained Trotskyites from beginning to end. The, Soviet Union was the vehicle of the Jewish revolutionary spirit, but but by the 19 seventies beginning in 19 seventies, the United States took over that world. It was the cutting edge of the Jewish revolutionary spirit in the world, where it stands pretty much today. Speaker 1: My feeling is this regarding the story about Nazism and Hitler and the Third Reich that until we can actually face the truth about it all, we can never seriously correct the problems of the current day nor can we ever fight Zionism and the New World Order and all of its manifestations until we recognize the truth about World War II, that the origins of the New World Order are found in the Talmud and often vile, occult work that is the basis of Jewish religious thinking today just as when it first emerged during the Jewish captivity in Babylon. When I first became aware in my early years of the nature of the American political process, I mistakenly believed it was a matter of democrat versus republican. However, it took many years for me to realize that the real battle is actually between good and evil. And ultimately I came to realize that those who are in command of the money power on our planet today, those who are pushing for a new world order, represent that evil. Speaker 11: The damage inflicted was Speaker 7: horrendous. Speaker 41: You were both in stone and bone, the secret society. Speaker 2: It's so secret we can't talk Speaker 7: about it. Speaker 1: What does that mean for America? Speaker 33: How many Americans have heard of the great hunger? Where between 1958 and 1962 in China, the regime that we had brought to power there, when we, toppled the regime of Chiang Kai shek and brought the communist to power in 1949. That between 1958 and 1960 2, the communist government starved to death, between 41 and 43,000,000 people. You cannot understand anything going on today unless you understand there is a continuing revolution. Just last year, we completed another revolution. As we buck the communist regime that has taken over in Nepal. Nation after nation after nation is prepared for the ultimate goal, that age old plan of a new world order. Well, professor Leo Strauss at the University of Chicago taught his pupils all about Plato. And Plato is pivotal to an understanding of everything going on today. Plato's republic really talked about this idea of creating an ideal or utopian society ruled by a so called just man. And they were going to have this utopian society, and and this was going to solve all the problems of humanity. And professor Leo Strauss told his students, Plato had 2 messages. He had one message for the common students. He had another message for the elite students who were told the secret and are introduced to the mysteries. And the mysteries have existed since the beginning of recorded time and continue being promoted throughout the world today. Now to understand the mysteries, you have know a little bit about that time. The Sagras had lived between 585495 BC. Speaker 2: He was Speaker 33: the first in the great Greek philosophers. And he traveled to the east and studied the mystery religions, returned to Greece, and set up a school where the mystery religions were taught. Now most of you may have heard of the Pythagorean dictum. You probably learned it when you took, geometry and that is the fact that a square plus b square is equal to c square. The sum of the square root of the two sides of a right angled triangle is equivalent to the square root of the of the right angled triangle. This is seminal to an understanding of geometry. Where did he get this idea? You ever wondered how the great pyramids were were built? Have you ever wondered the the marvels of the world, the Colossus of Rhodes? Have you ever seen, depictions of what this was, the Temple of Zeus? The magnificent architecture that existed long long before man had the capacity to build these things using normal human intelligence. Where did the knowledge come from? Well about 2 generations after the Thagmus established this school for teaching the mysteries, in Greece along comes Socrates. Socrates' student was Plato who lived from 428 to 347 BC. And Plato, then, of course, had a student, Aristotle. And Aristotle had a student named Alexander the Great. And Alexander the Great set out to conquer the world, to fulfill this idea of creating the this perfect in Utopian society. For the very, very small force of Macedonia, and some people say as few as, oh, 35,000, took on the greatest armies in the world. He challenged Darius, who was the emperor of Persia, with 100 of 1000 of men Conquer Darius. And it allows, of course, Alexander move into the Near East and the Middle East into Afghanistan. Did you ever wonder how he did it? Was there an x factor that most people have never heard of? It's very, very rare that you will find people ever mentioning the secret of the mysteries. However, if we came across a book, it was written probably in the 1st century AD. It was written by Plutarch. The book is called Plutarch, the age of Alexander. I have a copy. You can still get it in print. On page 259, they talk about Alexander and the mysteries. And let me read you what he said. It seems clear that Alexander was instructed by his teacher not only in the principles of ethics and politics, but also in those secrets and more esoteric studies, which philosophers do not impart to the general run of students, but only by word-of-mouth to a select circle of the initiated. The mysteries tells the secret and tell how you can tap into the hidden power. But this was not to be known by the common people. If you go to Strasbourg today, you will find a replica of the incomplete tower of Babylon. It is where the European Union meets on a weekly basis. Why did they create a replica of the incomplete tower of Babylon? Because that's what the European Union is all about. It is about the reconstitution of Nimrod's ancient plan and of basically creating a one world government under a ruling elite. The plan is much larger than the European Union because there's to be an American Union, Mexico, United States, Canada, South American Union, an African Union, an Asian Union, a union of the Arab States. And when all of these countries have given up their national sovereignty in the trade blocks, then to unite them into a one world government with a one world currency, a one world ruler, and a one world religion. After the destruction of Nebroad's empire, people began moving other places, and you see the the evidence of the tremendous knowledge that they had acquired in the the temple of Giza. It's perfectly aligned, north, south, east, and west. How were they able to align that at that time? How were they actually able to move those gigantic stones into place and the perfect symmetry of that 5000 years ago? Speaker 7: If you Speaker 33: go to South America, you'll find the pyramids there all aligned in the same order. The Mayan and Inca pyramids. Where did the knowledge come from? And what was this really all about? Well, in about 600 BC, when the Jews were living in Babylon, while the rabbis then were introduced to the mystery religions. And it was at that point that the Kabbalah was created. About the 1st century after birth of Christ, there was a Christian heresy. It was known as Gnosticism which was really a Christian type of the kabbalah. And then of course you find all throughout history this continuity of the mystery religions and of the secret. Certainly, this is what motivated the Knights Templar. And of course, the Knights Templar then persisted in the Holy Land until the defeat of the crusades, and then they moved to Europe where they became the most powerful force in Europe, all during the 1200. And they persisted as the major force, the 1st international bankers in Europe. In the 1400 came the Rosicrucians, and they were simply another organization that had tapped into the secret knowledge. There are literally thousands of books that are written by people who are devotees of the new age indirectly back to Madame Blavatsky Speaker 7: who founded the Theosophical Society in 18/35. And you Speaker 33: begin to Hell, Speaker 7: fellowship, Speaker 41: Yale University is 300 years old this year and were you to visit its campus, you would see that it's where Yale's secret societies meet. Speaker 8: Senators John Kerry and John Chaffee to name 2, and 3 presidents, William Taft, George Bush, and George W Bush. The tape is a valuable artifact, an extremely rare view into the secret society that groomed the American ruling class for generations. Speaker 33: The Kabbalah, out of the Knights Templar, out of the Rosicrucians, out of the Illuminati, and of the upper echelons of masonry of which most masons have no idea. But the fact is that there is another god and that's Satan. Speaker 18: A Soviet scientist, Shofarevich, who has nothing to do with religion, is a computer scientist, did a very intensive research on the history of socialist countries. He calls socialist or communist any country with a centralized economy and the pyramidal style of power structure. And he discovered that civilizations like in the river Hindu's area, like Egypt, like Maya, Incas, like the colonial culture collapsed and disappeared from the surface of Earth. The moment they lost religion, they disintegrated. All the sophisticated technology and computers will not prevent society from disintegrating and eventually dying out. Speaker 12: Have you ever met Speaker 18: a person who would sacrifice his life, freedom for the truth like that? This is truth. I never met the person who said this is truth, and I'm ready to defend the truth. Right? But millions sacrifice their life, freedom, comfort, everything for things like God, like Jesus Christ. It's an honor. Some markers in in the Soviet concentration camp died, and they died in peace unlike those who shouted long live Stalin. Something which is not material moves society and helps it to survive. And the other way around, the moment we turn into 2 by 2 is 4 and make it a guiding principle of our life, our existence, we die. Even though this is true and this we cannot prove, where we can feel and have faith in it. So the answer to ideological subversion, strangely enough, is very simple. You simply have to have faith. In other words, don't try to be a person who in zudo is trying to smash your enemy and being caught by your hand. Don't strike like that. Strike with the power of your spirit and moral superiority. If you don't have the power, it's high time to develop it, and that's the only answer. Speaker 2: Capitalism is state sponsored user. Karl Marx, coming from an ancient line of rabbis and imbibed the Jewish revolutionary spirit and gave it a new form known as communism. And he was understood the other side of the coin, very well because he said, the Jewish god is money or mammon as we say in the bible. So what what you see here here are basically 2 parallel tracks. How can I symbolize this? Jacob Schiff, one of the richest Jews in New York City, and Trotsky, one of the most famous Jewish revolutionaries collaborate. Schiff gives Trotsky money, Trotsky rents a ship, and got all these revolutionaries. They sailed to Russia. Why are they going to attack Russia? Well, because it's the only Christian country left in Europe. From a Marxian perspective, if you're gonna say that revolution is based on class conflict, this makes no sense whatsoever, but it does make sense from an ethnic point of view because they're both Jews. What do they have in common? They have this sense of hatred toward, Christian culture. So what you find after a while is that both capitalism and communism are both working to destroy Christian culture. Lloyd Blankfein, to give you a a recent example, chairman of Goldman Sachs, which is a Jewish firm, and, he supports gay marriage. So once again, you have this this Jewish rich supporting the revolution, destroying the social order, but we don't wanna just destroy the social order. What they wanna do is create a new social order, a Jewish social order, in which the Jews are in control, and the main way the Jews stays in control is through usury. It's not capitalism versus communism. It's labor versus usury. The people engaging in exchange of goods and services in the nation, All of those people taken together make up the economy. We have 2 choices in this world, base the economy on labor or to base it on usury. And so the ancient world, to begin with, was based on slavery. Aristotle could not conceive of a philosopher without slave doing all the manual labor that would allow him the leisure to philosophize. So slavery was one aspect of the Roman Empire. The other aspect is usury, and these two things go hand in hand because usury creates slavery. And the the magic formula that does this is known as compound interest. If you're on the right side of compound interest, in other words, if you're a creditor, the money just pours into your pocket, and you don't have to do anything. If you're on the wrong side of compound interest, which is to say if you're a debtor, well, then you can do whatever you want and you're still falling. You're gonna fall behind because nothing in this world can keep up with the inexorable nature of compound interest. So you put this together in a, an empire like the Roman Empire, which basically acquired wealth, from plunder, bringing the gold back to Rome. That gold ended up into the hands of wealthy people who would then lend it out at interest. The overwhelming majority started to fall into debt slavery. And so as a result, when the Roman Empire collapsed because Speaker 32: of all Speaker 2: of the things that's plaguing this country, because of debt, of foreign wars, of enslavement, of the concentration of wealth, and so on and so forth. The new system that took its place was Christianity. Because of the collapse of civilization, the new system was implemented by Benedict and monks who created monasteries, which were basically self sufficient little farms, whatever you wanna call them, where the monks would have land. They took a vow of stability, and they were bound to the land by their vow, and so they would work the land. So given this fact, now we have a whole new world, and the whole new world begins in Europe. It's kinda kinda rocky beginnings because Europe is being plundered by the boring, barbaric, Germanic tribes would come down. They crossed the Danube. They crossed the Rhine. They took over the Roman Empire, and they set up their kingdom. It would have remained that way forever, except for the fact that the Benedictines taught them how to engage in agriculture. So you're talking about the Christianization of these barbaric Germanic tribes. Over a certain period of time, wealth started to arise in Europe. And at the beginning, when you had economic exchange, money was little pieces of gold or silver. And so what you had to do was carry bags of gold to a place where the buyers and sellers came together. Well, this is always a bad idea because someone can rob you along the way, and that's it. The Italians in Italy started instead of sending gold back and forth, I'll just make an entry here and you make an entry there. And so this was the beginning of double entry bookkeeping. And so it was tending toward paper in in that regard. So at this point, you have the beginning of the money economy out of prosperity in Europe. And at this point, because we have a money economy, people need money. The problem is that up until this point, you've got an economy for the average guy, the surf, that is based not on money, but on labor. In other words, you owe the lord 3 days a week. And if you do that, then your your obligation is fulfilled. Well, at this point, the lord doesn't want 3 days a week. He wants money because he's gotta buy things. And so how do you get the money? Where's the money gonna come from? Well, you gotta borrow it. Well, it's immoral to lend money. So who's gonna do it? Well, the Jews are gonna do it. The Jew would lend you money and it was a pawnshop, basically. So if you're a farmer, you hock your plow, he gives you money to pay your taxes, and he charges you 43 and a third percent interest. Unfortunately, if you're a farmer and your plows in the pawn shop, you're in trouble. You can't earn any money, and so there's immediate problems. In other words, we're talking about usury causing immediate social unrest that would more often than not, throughout this period of time, lead to the expulsion of the Jews from any country. So the standard Jewish explanation is anti semitism. It's an awful thing. Every country they go, there's anti semitism. Well, it turns out that the real reason is Jewish behavior. As always, the reason people don't like Jews is because the way Jews behave. And in this instance, it's lending money, which caused huge amounts of animosity. The people rioted, and the first thing they did was head toward the Jews' house to burn the records about how much money he owed. And the king realizing it's gonna of the insurrection just expels the Jews, renegues on his loans, and that's the story over and over and over again throughout Europe. During this period of time, the the Catholic church starts protesting. Franciscans start preaching against usury. For a century, they're preaching against user. The end of 14th century, the beginning of the money era, the the serfs were being cheated out of their labor. They were being ground. They needed money, and so there was rebellions in England. In Florence, it was called the Chompy Rebellion. Always the infallible sign that you're not being paid a decent wage, whether it's Florence in the end of the 14th century, whether it's the United States in 19 seventies. What happened in America is the same thing that happened then. Wages stopped going up in the 19 seventies, and as soon as wages stopped going up, guess what arrives on the scene? Credit cards. And so credit cards take up the slack, the wages, and they give the people the illusion that they still have money. When you don't, you're being cheated out of your wages and the credit card is the proof that you're being cheated out of your wages. Anytime you're dealing with usury, any present solution is always paving the way for a disaster on the horizon because of compound interest. You can never keep up. No one can keep up with it, and there's a revolution that takes place. The choppy redo this is a moment. It's one of those moments in history where things could have gone right because a new dictator, Savona Rola, famous Dominican, has a true sense of what Christian culture is all about, and what it's all about is charity. And the antithesis of charity in this instance is sodomy and usury are the infallible sign that your culture is terminally corrupt because they're both unnatural. The sodomite takes what is fertile, namely sex, and makes it sterile through homosexual activity, and the user takes what is sterile, namely money, and makes it fertile through use. So they're both bad, and so Savonarola, brings about a reform, a huge reform of behavior. Problem is the pope is probably the most corrupt pope in the history of the church, Alexander the 6. Tavonarola calls her king of France to depose the pope. Bad idea because the pope is not gonna put up with this, and they arrest Tavonarola, and they put him to death. And at this point, the moment of reform dies. Just to give you some indication of the power of usury as opposed to any power on the face of this earth, when the Habsburg started borrowing money from the Fuggers, who were these people bankers, They started in 1494 around then. The Fookers never charged them more than 5%. During the course of the next, 70 years, the Hopsborgs in basically became the owners of every single gold and silver mine in the new world. And the a river of gold and silver started flowing into Spain, and 70 years later, they went bankrupt because not even all the gold in America can keep up with compound interest. Because, eventually, all you're doing is paying off your loans. You let it go long enough, you think, oh, I'll just do the minimum payment. Well, that just starts to snowball. The criterion of a just wage is not how far down you can drive it. It's not a a commodity like any other commodity that's a function of supply and demand. It is a function of the family, and so the criterion of a just wage is whether you can a man by himself can support a wife and children on his salary. That is the objective criteria. If that's not it, your your society is not just. Well, guess what we happened during this period of time? Just as we're talking about the seventies, what was the big praise in the seventies other than disco? It was called feminism. And what is the main, tenet of feminism other than making a sacrament out of abortion? It is equal pay for equal work, which is code word for destroying the family. These slave drivers love rootless individuals. Speaker 43: They've replaced English common law, make the car after 1215 with Talmud law. And the Christians have got no rights to property or justice. And this is what we're up against here in the UK. This is an order. I'm I'm just after winning it, try a case for a client now. They don't wanna be robbed at the property again. I see the judge that he was operating a court without a jury, which is high treason. Where are the English businesses in the high streets? No. Not. No. And you've got you've got Tesco's. You've got Morrisons. They've all got Careparks and double your lines outside the English family businesses. It all closed out. And they've taken them over now with the Tesco's inside in the in a real little town and village. Tesco's is in there taking up all the money. They want war, a war situation all of the time, and then they can they can come in and rob you. And this is what they're doing. The the history of the Jews in Ireland goes back over a 1000 years. So who was the IRA? Speaker 13: No. Speaker 43: Who was born the IRA? Another false flag. They want more of a war situation all the time so that they can oppress the people. Because we're animals. We're classed the same as animals. We're fast the same as cattle, and they're milking us. They're milking us dry. Speaker 2: Turn off your pornography. Don't talk about gay marriage. Talk about something real. Talk about the fact that as a student, you're involved in crushing debt, and it's not right. Talk about the fact that you're you're underwater. You bought this house, and now you're underwater, and you gotta pay, you gotta pay $250,000 for a $50,000 house because you took out a $100,000 mortgage. Let's talk about reality now and stop talking about the bread and circuses here, all of which are there, whether it's sex, whether it's pornography, or whether it's football to distract us from the real issues. Speaker 44: The Trump took that £6,080, they didn't owe Yes. Which is multiplied to £76,000. Speaker 2: If you Speaker 12: can get it. Alternate. Speaker 44: In an industry Tell me, is off created from taking people's property off off a very small amount of money, setting every strap in the box, playing it out with your rights, being led astray by council officials to play you out out of your rights. Every little chance of justice has been preempted by another, comparison case to block that, to block every chance of you overturn it, a death. My only sin is that an argument with the council. How dare I argue with the council? How dare you? This is a gun at your head. Hey, y'all. Don't come and argue. Otherwise, we'll say it out, Sofia. Speaker 43: The peace they promise is never ending war. Speaker 1: Don't die like a beast. If you're dead set to be sunk in the mid Atlantic or Pacific or scorched in the desert, at least know why it is done to you. To die not knowing why is to die like an animal. To die like a human being, you have at least got to know why it is done to you. So to understand of what is commonly referred to as the New World Order, the idea of a one world or global government, we must acknowledge these critical factors. And while there are those who do recognize that the Rothschild banking family are key players in the drive for a new world order, there is still much misinformation and deliberate disinformation surrounding this dynasty whose tentacles now reach into the highest levels of the American system. The new world order is real, and this is what it's all about, that the consolidation of Rothschild power over the British Empire laid the foundation for the framework of the New World Order, that the United States today, as a result of Rothschild's influence within, is now the virtual engine of Rothschild's power. That the United States constitutes the new Babylon in the Jewish world view, the force to be utilized for achieving the new world order. There are still forces even at high levels resisting the Jewish utopia. However, there are many non Jewish powers that have come to accept the Jewish influence as a reality that must be dealt with. These elements have thus surrendered and allow their own desire for power to dictate their cooperation with the New World Order, hoping, we presume, to be granted a few crumbs when the Jewish utopia comes into being. They're fooling themselves, for they fail to understand the philosophical intentions of the New World Order so clearly outlined in Jewish teaching. In truth, the age old Jewish dream of a New World Order set forth in the Talmud was, in a definitive sense, the driving force behind the rise of the Rothschild Empire. S j Cohen, who wrote an early admiring biography of Meyer Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild dynasty. He says, Meyer Rothschild was a zealous believer in the Talmud and chose it alone as the guiding principle of all his actions. That Jewish state known as Israel. We're taught that all the Jews are just looking for a nice little homeland where they can thrive among themselves. No. It's much more than that. The City of London, I call it the jewel of Rothschild's imperial crown, not even part of the City of London as we think of the City of London as the capital of England or as a geographic entity. The City of London is the financial foundation for this global imperium, this Jewish utopia. Speaker 45: After the great fire of London in 16/66, sir Christopher Wren was chosen to redesign Saint Paul's Cathedral. He oriented Saint Paul's in line with the axis of temple church. Extending beyond Saint Paul's, we see the alignment continues to the Bank of England. The bank was chartered in 16/94 during the construction of Wren's Cathedral. More than just a local branch, the Bank of England is the central bank of the whole of the United Kingdom and is the model on which most countries modern central banks are based. The Bank of England is literally the mother of all banks. Temple Bar was a gate designed by sir Christopher Wren to ceremonially bar access to the city of London. Wren's gate is no longer there. It is a little known legal fact that the monarch may not enter the city of London without the permission of the lord mayor of London. He's the guy who runs the city of London corporation, a tiny private jurisdiction that covers only about one square mile. Speaker 1: John McCain, American disciple of the Rothschild Empire. John McCain didn't get elected president, Rothschild Court in London for their support along with his good friend Joe Lieberman, recognizing that that's where the real power lies, folks. These kings of kings, the secret influence behind the thrones, who years years ago, back in the 1800, people were all already saying that the Rothschilds would be the rollers of a world in the hands of the Jews, the Rothschilds and the families working with them. The 30 most powerful Jewish families, the Bronsman gang, the royal family of American Jewry. The Bronson. These are the people who are complaining that they're suppressed and oppressed and the people who are campaigning to destroy them, and yet they are the ones who control the media. They're the ones who control academia. They're the ones who dominate many industries. Speaker 46: Behind me is the temple of Apollo on the Rothschild estate. They talked about, Lucifer being God. And the initiates of the higher order of the masonic religion following the Luciferian doctrine. These people here, they support the socialist agenda, but are they socialist? No. See, communism is not a creation of the masses to overthrow the banking establishment. It's a creation of the banking establishment to overthrow and enslave the masses. The leadership of communism isn't really run from Moscow, Beijing, Hanoi, or Havana. It's always been run from London, New York, and Washington DC. It's not a movement of the poor. It's a movement the rich. The people think they're getting something for nothing they're gonna take from the rich and give to the poor. These Speaker 15: sheep Speaker 46: are like so many of you who don't recognize that you're being shared. They don't recognize what is before your very eyes. With people, the people here, just going along with the surrender of the national sovereignty. Going along with the enslavement, going on with those things which are intolerable. When you accept the intolerable, you wake up in the morning in a nation, you're slave. Speaker 47: It is Murdoch's papers that cheerlead the war in Iraq, that cheerleads all UK foreign policy when it is in lockstep with Washington. It cheerlead the bailouts after the financial crash of 2,008. But it's not just his newspapers that exert a disproportionate influence on life in Britain. Books and films in Britain are de facto vetted by Murdoch because News Corp is involved in HarperCollins and 20th Century Fox. And his Sky News operation will never want to upset the interests of Murdoch as long as he is in control of the network. Speaker 48: If Gaddafi, had an intent to try to, reprice his oil or whatever else the, the country was selling in the global markets and accept something else as a currency or maybe launch a gold in our currency. Any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today who are responsible for controlling the world's central banks. So, yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and the need for other reasons to, to be brought forth for removing him from power. Speaker 2: Muammar Gaddafi ran his government in the interest of the Libyan people. In Libya, you've got a free education, and you've got free health care. The largest cause Speaker 7: of bankruptcy in the United States is medical bills. People Speaker 2: go to operation with a operation with a credit card. You had all of these benefits in Libya going to the Libyan people. Now the country will be put under the advocates of the international banking system, and they will end up loaded down with usurious debt for education, for jobs that don't exist and they can't pay for. Mohammad Speaker 3: Qaddafi has a choice. The resolution that passed lays out very clear conditions that must be met. These terms are not subject to negotiation. If Gaddafi does not comply with the resolution, community will impose consequences, and the resolution will be enforced through military action. Speaker 2: This is overthrowing a government that did nothing to harm any country in NATO. This was an act of naked aggression. This is a looting operation. This is the NATO's attempt to use the Arab Spring Revolutions as cover to take over a country, a sovereign country that has not attacked NATO and to loot this country of its resources, its oil, its water, and its gold. Speaker 15: Ever since I saw the plan back in 1971 and 72 when I was on the intelligence briefing team for SINKBACK fleet to bring about 1 world totalitarian socialist government. And when I saw that the United States was behind the whole thing to create world government over the ashes of all sovereign nations and existing religions around this world. This is not coming from without. United States created the United Nations. United States created the European Union. Speaker 38: The EEC was created by the Central Intelligence Agency working through a lodge in Italy called the P2 Lodge. Propaganda 2 is the name of it which is the intelligence arm of the Vatican and Prince Barnard who is the leader of this world council that controls these secret societies Speaker 15: where we're called the Bilderberg group, Speaker 38: they are destroying it. They are subverting it. Our constitution has not been allowed to work since 1945 and maybe even earlier. And they have been working behind the scenes to bring about a one world totalitarian socialist government with the Communist Manifesto as its platform through the United Nations, which was created by this nation from an older organization called the League of Nations, which was the original foundation. And, at the highest levels of our government, the constitution has already been scrapped and they are working under the aegis of the UN Participation Speaker 49: Act Speaker 38: in the United Nations Charter. Speaker 32: Which says what? Speaker 38: Which says that there are no rights, there are only privileges and privileges can be granted or taken away at will by the state. Speaker 50: Quite frightening scenario. Speaker 38: It's a very frightening scenario and people better wake up to the fact that unless they wake up and do something about it now, there's only going to be one alternative. And that's either take up arms, restore the constitution and the blood will run-in the streets of America or reach down and put the shackles around your own feet and march off into slavery peacefully. Speaker 15: Well, it shocked the hell out of me, but they thought I was one of them And it was an accident that I got in there. I've been a member of the Demile Society when I was 13 years old. Only attended 3 meetings, and then my father was transferred to Japan. I never saw another lodge and never went to another meeting. That was the end of that. And then I filled out all my documentation for my top secret QSI security clearance, which was required to be able to work in the command center and on the briefing team at Syncact Fleet. I didn't see DMA on there, so I checked Freemason. And when I checked Freemason, that's what opened all the doors and got me the security clearance and put me in those positions to be able to see what I saw. And I think the hand of God was working when that happened so that I would be able to warn his people of what was coming. And I've been doing that ever since. I didn't see absolutely everything, but I saw enough to give me an edge and a vast head start on anybody that's ever lived before in the public sector that's not normally privy to this and I spent the last well, ever since researching to to find out what it all meant and where we're going. They know that there's a hard core group of American men and women who are who are devout religious moral people, love freedom and are dedicated to the concept of liberty and freedom and will fight to protect and defend constitutional republican government against anything that comes along. And when that begins, it's going to be a terrible, terrible thing. I've spent most of my adult life trying to warn people and wake up enough people so that this did not have to happen because I know it's going to be terrible. Since 1988, when I began telling the, the world, not just the American people, but the world about majesty 12, which is the plan to enslave the human race in a world totalitarian socialist government. The merger of the military of the United States and what used to be known as the old Soviet Union under NATO, which is occurring now. People don't understand that NATO is is an arm of the United Nations. It was formed under the auspices of the United Nations Charter and takes its orders from the from the Security Council. Warsaw Pact was also formed under the auspices of the United Nations Charter and was an arm of the United Nations and took its orders also from the Security Council. The Cold War was a total farce and that's why we never had any any military conflicts with the Soviet Union. Speaker 38: George Bush said it very clearly, but nobody was listening when he said, no longer will any nation stand against a world united. And with that action, he established the legal foundation in international law that the United Nations is now legally a one world government. You see our forefathers were also members of this secret group and this country was founded to bring about the New World Order. Speaker 50: So at the beginning, the founders of this country actually did create what was a, I guess, you could say an above board good government basis, basis for a good government? Speaker 38: They gave us every tool to ensure the success. But it was an experiment you see, because man had always claimed he could rule himself, but he'd never been allowed to do that. In the history of the world, there had never been a people who were truly free or who truly rule themselves until the United States of America was created as a republic by which we rule ourselves through elected representatives that we sent to the State House either in the States or to Congress. They also gave us every tool by which we would destroy ourselves if we weren't capable of doing it. The United States and France, the revolution in this country and the revolution in France were created to bring about governments which would function as the antithesis to the kings and queens of the world and caused them to topple off their thrones. It also gave man a chance to prove once and for all whether to rule himself or not And if he could find, that would be the new world order. If he couldn't, they built the tools into the constitution to allow them to creation of the federal democracy within the boundaries of Washington D. C. And the right to contract through which if we were irresponsible we would contract to receive rights from that federal democracy and thus in return give up our freedom. And that's exactly what's happening. We're seeing the destruction of the economy of the United States and it will continue. It will not get better. We need to send people to Congress and to government who are going to clean house, kick all the members of secret societies out of the bureaucracy, try them for treason, but they are traitors. Speaker 51: And bringing these tanks and stuff around here, I tell you what, being an American first, no one's gonna hurt me or my family. That's American policy here. You could've arrested me any day as I jogged up and down this road. You could've arrested me going to town or going to Walmart, and never will I ever appreciate somebody coming here with 2 helicopters and cab trailers and all that because this ain't America anymore when ATF has that kind of power to come into anybody's home and kick doors down and things like that. Somebody's gonna get hurt. Anytime. And I'm sorry some of you guys got shot, but, hey. Now let me. Speaker 15: The people whose ancestors came to the new world to escape persecution in the Old World, stood and watched the branch Davidians burn, including all of their children, all of their women. And they cheered. And said, it was because they were a bunch of religious fanatic. And to their shame, I have to tell them they are stupid, ignorant, people who are on the, the verge of enslavement, and they're gonna deserve exactly what they get. Speaker 38: What I've discovered is there's no proof existing anywhere that extraterrestrials are real or that have ever visited this planet. There is not one shred of evidence anywhere. There is lots of evidence, tons of it in fact, that there are a group of people who want us to believe in some extraterrestrial threat from space so that they can cause a bringing together of all the people to resist that external threat. Eight times during Reagan's administration, he inserted almost the exact same phrase into 8 of his speeches. Speaker 40: Perhaps we need some outside universal threat. Speaker 7: I occasionally think how Speaker 12: quickly our differences worldwide Speaker 40: vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. And yet I ask you, is not an alien force already among us? Speaker 13: He walked on the moon. Tonight, he says, aliens are among us. Speaker 34: They obviously have a different body configuration than we do, and the little or the little grays, that's the most prevalent Speaker 7: one. Speaker 13: Doctor Mitchell is one of only 12 people who have walked on the moon. He says he has never personally seen an alien but believes the people who say they have. Speaker 15: I just hope they cling to their technology with all they've got. I hope they train every soldier to use computers and and not be able to function without a satellite uplink and all of that stuff so we can just pick their butt and try them for the crimes that they're guilty of. They have declared war upon me and all patriots and everybody in this country who who has taken an oath to protect and defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And, if the civil war has to start on my doorstep, that's as good as place as any. Speaker 1: This all happened in a little town called Eager, Arizona, which is just on the eastern side of the state of Arizona. It's almost on the border of New Mexico. Sheriff's deputies, they understand, were trying to serve some type of arrest warrant on a man by the name of William Cooper. He's also known as Bill Cooper. He has a website he understands, and on that website, he acknowledges that there is an arrest warrant for him, but he writes, and we're quoting here, any attempt by any federal government agent or anyone else to execute the unlawful arrest warrants will be met with armed resistance. Any person who attempts to kidnap our children will be shot upon discovery, and that is apparently what happened during the gunfight. Cooper himself was shot, and he was killed. He was shot, and he was killed. Speaker 7: Try and Speaker 42: help the Russians in every way that we can to make ready to meet the spring offensive of Hitler. I appreciate there are some people in this country who are still afraid of the spread of the Russian ideology. But what they've got to recollect is that if we are friendly with Russia and have an arrangement of cooperation with them, any dangers which they fear will be very much less. As a matter of fact, the Soviet Union have no idea and no wish to interfere with the internal affairs of any other country. I know that from the lips of Stalin himself. Speaker 52: Killed, and they even make soap out of them. I know that. I know that directly from firsthand. You can be sure. It is that way. Futile attempts, which they knew by any logic that they can't succeed to jump out from the from the lorries, which takes them to the gas chambers, which are only perhaps less than a mile away, and which were already stoked, and the fire was coming out from the chimneys. There's a fire coming out from the chimneys. Speaker 49: There was a man in the United States called Henry C. Morgenthau, who was the Secretary of the Treasury and a very close friend of the President Franklin Roosevelt. And Morgenthal wanted vengeance on the Germans. And he drew up what became called the Morgenthal plan. And he presented this plan to Churchill and Roosevelt at a meeting which was held in Quebec City in Canada in And Roosevelt and Churchill signed the plan to reduce the population of Germany. The death of 20,000,000 people was approved and then the press got a hold of us in the States and Canada. So Roosevelt, in the autumn of 1944, disowned the plan and said, Oh, I don't know how I could have signed that. But he did. So he said, Of course, we won't do that. But then they went ahead secretly planning to do just that. And the deaths of the prisoners was the first step and the deaths of millions of Speaker 7: war. Speaker 49: Off 1,500,000 Germans in camps after the war. The whole of Germany from 1945 to 1950, it was just a prison. We ran it and we said what happened there. Nobody can immigrate and so on. And the government has to do what we say. And you can't have an army, on and on and on. We ran things. And the Germans were reeducated. All their textbooks were rewritten. They destroyed all the old ones and made them write new ones. You'll see in other losses that there was a group of university academics writing about the prisoners of war, Billy Brown. He took over the books that these academics were putting together, and he told them not to say anything that would upset the Americans. Speaker 53: I brought that guy back from Israel, John Deminyuk. It was my Freedom of Information Act, which proved not only that he was innocent, but who Ivan really was. The case was so sensitive. Members of Congress would say, Jim, I love you, but please don't involve me. I sent my evidence to the 6th Circuit Court in Cincinnati. They wouldn't accept it. I finally send it over to Israel, to the Israeli Supreme Court, and they called me over there, and I went with the family. I did a live interview satellite with Brian Gumbel, and I said, when they put this innocent man to death, they're going to lose 15 to $20,000,000,000 every year they get from the American taxpayers. And Brian Gumbel says, what are you talking about? They only get $3,000,000,000. And I said, Brian, that's only the foreign aid bill. Look at all the other trade compacts, economic assistance, military assistance. I'm saying this to you right now. Israel gets approximately $15,000,000,000 a year from the American taxpayers. That 15,000,000,000 is $30,000 for every man, woman, and child, and people in my district are losing their pension benefits. So I was targeted big time. Speaker 21: There was a bankruptcy that was concocted right after, the Great Depression, when many of our grandparents were still struggling to survive. And, what happened was they were expatriated. They had no knowledge of this. They certainly did not give their consent. America's gold was stolen by the international bankers. Our gold and silver was stolen, and, we were collateralized as a nation against this concocted debt. What was collateralized? Our property, our equity, our children, and our souls. So I won't get into how the souls become collateralized because that's a different conversation. We're a nation, we're USA Inc. And we're running on a corporate structure. It has a very significant structure. It's based on contract that have been signed for us and implemented for us, and you don't know about this. They don't think that you need to. We're not running America. Globalists are running America. 93549, it's very, very clear. Our country, every year since 1933, has initiated a perpetual emergency war powers. Every year, it's reinitiated by every sitting president. And what that means is that when we're under a perpetual emergency powers act, the constitution has been suspended. The senate report 93549, which identifies all of you and me as enemies of the government, then you build upon the silent weapons document, which is a technical research manual that was put together in the forties by the US Air Force, Rockefeller, the International Bankers, and Harvard University. It is a manual that is, intended for economic domination of the world and control of all energy. And it's important to understand they plan to control it all. Now they say in the silent weapons, quiet wars document that when you have a few wealthy people with the methodologies and the goal to control all energy on the planet, and they have not told us. It is considered a declaration of war. And so the silent weapons document is a declaration of war. In fact, William Cooper has it in the very front of his book, behold a pale horse. Now the reason why the silent weapons document is so important is they wrote it and it's in their words. Now many of you are noticing the cameras everywhere. They're on all the street corners. They're up the freeways. They're on buildings. They're everywhere. There are sensors everywhere. The surveillance in the United States has already imprisoned us, and the definition they say is when a silent weapon is applied gradually, the public adjusts and adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure, both psychological and economic, become too great and they crack up. They also tell us, therefore, the silent weapon system is a type of biological warfare. It attacks our vitality, our options, our mobility of individuals of a society by knowing that's the data collection. That's Bluffdale, Utah. That's the cameras. That's all the tracking. That's the camera in your computer screen when you're sitting behind your computer. That is the flicker rate, and that's what's happening on your televisions, everything that's coming wireless into your Speaker 7: home. Speaker 54: So as we come further back, we'll see how far it stays past the 100. This is considered extremely dangerous. Still is. As long as it's past 3, it's dangerous. We're all the way past there. Now getting closer, let's see when it stops. It's at a 100. We're about 4 and a half feet away right now. Immediately back to 0. So that's how dangerous the microwave. So in addition to taking all the vitamins and nutrients and radiating your food, the microwave just standing within about 4 and a half to 5 feet of it is dangerous for you because of, you know, of all the magnetic rays that it has. Speaker 2: This is examples of this Speaker 54: is a standard Mac laptop computer. So we put this on top and as you can see, we're still in the 0 to a 100 range. It immediately goes way off the charts past a 100. What does that mean to you? These are something that people keep on their lap. So we look here, going back. Soon as I get within a couple inches of it, it goes way off the chart. Now remember, 3 is what's dangerous. We're all the way up past a 100 when I touch it. So what does that mean? You don't wanna put a laptop on your lap. That's why Apple is no longer calling these laptops. They're calling them personal computers because when you put this on the lap, you're having it right on top of your reproductive organ. Speaker 26: Notice that this modem is innocently sitting here, apparently doing nothing. However, when we turn on the radio frequency meter, It is measuring the transmission of the wireless coming out of this modem. And you can see that the peak signal strength on the left on the left column of this meter is at almost 6 volts per meter. That's as high as it goes. I'm gonna show you the office is back in that direction through those doors. And although the reading is down a little bit on the meter, you can still see that the whole house is more or less being influenced by this radio frequency transmission. This is where I sleep. These are not high readings, but it's still gonna disturb melatonin levels. It's still gonna disturb my sleep. Speaker 21: You can look at Mount Weather, w e a t h e r. It is a underground facility that was built about 47 miles outside of Washington DC in the fifties, and it houses the intention to incarcerate every single one of us with data collection and tracking and monitoring and sensors. So what you're hearing Edward Snowden say is not a new revelation at all. We were told in the silent weapons document exactly what they intended to do. They talk about wanting to know and keeping in mind this was put together then in then in the forties about each and every single one of you, the what, where, why, when, how, and who. They were going to look at general sources of information. They were going to look at telephone taps. This is in the forties. Behavior of your children in school, where they would know your friends, your associations, your political affiliation. They would know your personal paper trail because they would know your banking account statements, your credit card purchases. Everything was tagged and planned to be tagged back in the forties with the universal product code. This is no new news. Speaker 11: If Hitler had won World War 2. But this is a very different America than the one we know. Speaker 55: It is a source of America's troubles. Speaker 11: In this America, technology is used to intimidate and control. Citizens are under constant surveillance by secret police. Speaker 41: Some foreign influence. Speaker 11: Fascism is always dependent on repression, secret police, some state control that tamps down any opposition. Living under Nazi rule would be absolutely terrible. Speaker 56: Then people act like like it's all okay, but look deep into their eyes. They're absolutely miserable. For Speaker 11: nearly 70 years, they have used technological advances to control and oppress the population. The government controlled internet is the newest weapon of mass deception. Social media promotes Nazi values. Speaker 2: It's important to remember that any innovation or any technology can be weaponized. The Twitter and Facebooks of the world can be corrupted and used in a totalitarian way for surveillance or whatever. Speaker 11: Today, totalitarian governments throughout the world use social media technology for surveillance and to control their Speaker 46: people are doing on the Internet. Speaker 56: Then people act like like it's all okay, but look deep into their eyes. They're absolutely miserable. Speaker 21: Now I found it interesting, interesting, when I listened to Bill Gates on TED Talk, and he said that the world has 6,800,000,000 people, and that's headed up to about 9,000,000,000. Now he says, quote, now if we really do a great job on new vaccines and health care, reduction of health services, we could lower the number of people. Now Bill Gates goes on to further say if he only had one wish, only one wish, he would want there to be 0 CO 2 emissions by the year 2050. Now we're all dead if that occurs because we need c02. The plants survive. The earth survives. We survive, And the bulk of the population now believes the demonization of c 02 emissions just like fossil fuels are dead decaying dinosaurs. This is the Iron Mountain Mountain report. It's a blueprint for tyranny. It came out of the 19 sixties. They commissioned experts to look at what the United States would look like if we should transition out of a time of war into a golden age of peace. And Kennedy was assassinated prior to the completion of this report, and when this report was given to Johnson, he said because of the content it's never to be given to the American people. Well, a whistleblower leaked this document, and the government said it was a hoax. Our parents believed it was a hoax if they were not too busy to even know that it existed at the time. It's so important to understand this. And what is this? Well, the Iron Mountain report talks about how they were going to subvert education, exactly what Orlean and others in this room have been fighting so hard against. Speaker 32: So this this is a dovetail. Speaker 39: Don't stand for this. Speaker 21: They needed something so horrific and so impactful that it would be believable globally, and it would injure every single one of you equal to the effects of war. So they decided that that needed to be invented, and they invented global warming. They said at the time that they would have to bring the ecology up to enough damage by damaging the ecology with the corporate structure. NASA and the corporations have damaged our world intentionally to seduce us into the false illusion that it's our fault, that we have to now believe in scarcity, and we now have to reign in the population because there's too many of us. Speaker 57: We know more clearly than ever before that we carry common burdens, face common problems, and must respond with common action. And second, as we travel through space, as we pause one dead planet after another, we look back on our earth, a speck of life in an infinite void. Speaker 21: Now what is also very important is what Rothschild discovered about energy. He said he discovered there was a basic principle of power, influence, and control over people as applied in economics. The principle we've had a great many people assume the position of power. And because we have been intentionally kept very busy, we have given, our trust to those that represent us and they don't. Speaker 55: And in fact, I have determined that, here back during the Bush administration when they were talking about his neocons, the neoconservatives, that was just kind of a more modern polite term for National Socialism because that's what they were. Speaker 58: And what you just said is key. A bunch of the neocons were Jewish and had been Trotskyites, but at the University of Chicago, they followed one of the sheep dip Nazis who was the head of the program there to Strauss. And so they were actually communist that then adopted a fascist model, and they lobby for a fascist model. Speaker 55: Well, what they did was turn them from communist socialism to national socialism. Speaker 58: Yes. Socialism. Exactly. Speaker 24: Conservatives just to open the door and say come on in. If all you see is a sea of white Christian bases, you need to see people from your own communities getting to the top of the army, getting to the top of the legal profession, getting to the top of the business, and, yes, getting to the top of the conservative party and politics too. Speaker 12: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 24: Yeah. So the truth is, if we're gonna build that strong, vibrant, and inclusive society, we need more role models like this. Many more Muslim men and women at the top of the businesses, many more Muslim soldiers in the highest level of command, and, of course, more Muslims in our club. Speaker 32: Home. So there's Speaker 24: not just one Muslim in the cabinet and one in the shadow cabinet, but British Muslims all across government in positions of leadership and authority. Positions of leadership and authority. Speaker 43: Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization. This battle depends on the survival of Christian civilization. Speaker 24: It concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes. Speaker 40: Those weapons of mass destruction gotta be somewhere. Nope. No weapons over there. Maybe under here. Speaker 41: It's good to be back at the Council on Foreign Relations. As, Pete mentioned, I've been a member for a long time and was actually a director for some period of time. I never mentioned that when I was campaigning for reelection back home in Wyoming. Speaker 10: There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns. That is to say, we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns. The ones we don't know, we don't know. Speaker 11: But is this an unknown unknown Speaker 7: unknown unknown? Speaker 10: I'm not gonna say which it is. Speaker 24: We know this well here, the peddling of lies, that 911 was somehow a Jewish problem. Speaker 11: The 5 Israelis were detained for 10 weeks and finally deported on immigration violations after the FBI cleared them of any involvement in 911. Speaker 8: The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event. Speaker 30: Can you say why America is the greatest country in the world? Speaker 12: Diversity and opportunity. Speaker 18: Lewis? Speaker 32: Freedom and freedom. So let's keep it that way. Speaker 46: Well, the New York Jets. Speaker 1: No. I'm gonna hold you to an answer on that. What makes America the greatest country in the world? Why is America the greatest country Speaker 2: in the world, professor? That's my answer. Speaker 59: In conjunction with My Israel has arranged instruction for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. We wanna be the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's dynasty nature. Dynasty nature. Dynasty nature.
New World Order Communism by the Backdoor New World Order Communism By The Backdoor This sensational documentary by Dennis Wise proves beyond doubt that the western countries both "victorious and the defeated" after World War Two have been co rumble.com

@zadokq244514 - Zadok 💫

This is the first 2 hours and 17 minutes that I was not able to share earlier. (twitter has limits) Learn about the downfall of America.. Learn about Hollywood.. Learn about WW2… Learn about gay pride.. Learn about the Catholic Church.. Find out who is behind it all.. #history #hollywood #beyonce #ww2 #lucifer #satan #satanism #occult

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video features a series of disjointed and often conspiracy-laden statements from various speakers, discussing a wide range of topics such as the state of America, the Federal Reserve, communism, secret societies, Freemasonry, the United Nations, and the Pope. The speakers express their opinions and beliefs, often with a negative and critical tone. The video lacks coherence and does not provide any evidence or sources to support the claims made. The transcript also touches on topics such as sex education in schools, Hollywood's influence, the war on Christianity, conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11, and anti-Israel sentiments. It concludes with discussions on pedophilia, the power of the banking system, and the alleged role of Jews in manipulating world events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Move on to the Speaker 1: next question. Go ahead. Speaker 2: Hi. Can you say why America is the greatest country in the world? Speaker 3: Why is America country in the world, professor. That's my answer. You're saying Yes. You, sorority girl. Just in case you accidentally wander into a voting booth one day, there's some things you should know. And one of them is there is absolutely no evidence to support the statement that we're the greatest country in the world. We're 7th in literacy, 27th in math, 22nd in science, 49th in life expectancy, a 178th in infant mortality, 3rd in median household income, number 4 in labor force, and number 4 in exports. We lead the world in only 3 categories, number of incarcerated citizens per capita, number of adults who believe angels are real, and defense spending, where we spend more than the next 26 countries generation period ever. Period. So when you ask what makes us the greatest country in the world, I Speaker 4: don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Yosemite? Speaker 5: The whole agenda is to create a one world government, and the goals of the banking industry, not just the federal reserve system, but the private banks in Germany and England, all of Italy, all over the world, they all work together. They're all central banks, and they were and they're all part of the communist manifesto. You know, central banking is one of the major planks of the Communist Manifesto. We talk about America being a capitalist country, but yet at the same time, we have a central bank that plants everything for us. Right? And the graduated income tax is another plank of the communist manifesto. Right? So right there, you have 2 major planks in the communist manifesto that have been brought in because of the Federal Reserve System. Okay? So, the ultimate goal that these people have in mind is the goal to, create a one world government. Now they've taken over our government, both republicans and democrats. There's no difference anymore between the two parties. They control both parties. Doesn't matter to them which one wins because who's ever running for president will be someone they anoint. Okay? Whether it's Hillary Clinton or John McCain running for president next year, whichever they're gonna be people that can do what they want them to do. And the fact of the matter happens to be that you can't win an election unless you have enough money to win. They make sure who gets the money. It was necessary for them to take over America, take away our gun rights of of, freedom to bear arms, and create a country where we where we become slaves. Because once they take over America, the rest of the world becomes a lot easier for them. Speaker 6: November 16, 1933, the day we recognized Soviet Union. Its purpose, its open stated goal, its strategy was to overthrow the rest of the world and impose the teachings of Marx. And then Leninism, and then we get to Stalin. Now 4 American presidents beginning in 1917 refused to recognize this revolutionary government knowing full well that you could not have, quote, normal or even normal without quotes relations with a government calculating towards your own destruction. This was obviously you could not have agreements. They would be broken. You could not have any kind of deals or alliances. And so this this government was shunned by the United States until 19 33. And that was the year in November when Franklin Roosevelt then in his very first term recognized the Soviet Union in order to perpetuate this alliance to continue relations government had to learn to lie to the people. Tell us lies about communism, tell us lies about Stalin, tell us lies about Soviet Union. And I think in some way, these bills that we we we see in our our culture today, I think have their roots in this relationship, that that Roosevelt himself believed in. Convergence. And I suppose to be the money people you're talking about came out of that same mindset, and we're promoting that same mindset, and we're promoting that same mindset, and we're indeed the influence on Roosevelt in making this decision. Given the record of the Bolshevik government coming in, in terms of body count, in pre revolutionary times, the czarist government executed about 17 political prisoners a year. Compare this to the Spanish inquisition, which at its height destroyed 10 people a month. Month. But in that early those early revolutionary years, the Soviet, the new Bolshevik secret police executed without trial more than 1,000 people per month. Later in the 19 thirties, Stalin was killing tens of thousands of people per month, and yet the United States rushed into alliance, rushed to recognize the Soviet government under Roosevelt during World War 2, rushed into this alliance. And so you go again to these advisors, many of whom we later learned confirmed after archives opened on the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, we later learned many of these senior officials in the United States government were working for Stalin. I don't feel the same way about that war anymore, and I'm convinced that if my father was still living, that he would also greatly question what he had actually participated in. Because when you look at that post war map, what happened? There is a devastated Germany. And in that vacuum, there is a new thriving powerful US supplied Soviet empire in its Speaker 7: place. Speaker 6: I think most Americans would tell you they're still living in a capitalist free country with all manner of liberty. The brainwashing, of a certain kind of tyranny. It is does not have an of a certain kind of tyranny. It is does not have at this point. It does not have the gulag. It's not have people knocking at door with guns yet. It does, however, make examples of truth tellers. It makes examples of people who who cross the line, and this served to tyrannize us. And we are experiencing this. And yet you ask most people, they'll say we won the Cold War. Well, I say, look, 100 million dead after the communist century, and Republicans who have the majority in congress cannot muster the votes to repeal and defund socialized Speaker 8: The communist rules for revolution read like this. Corrupt the young. Get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial and destroy their ruggedness. Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible. Communist rules for revolution by encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce fear of inflation with rising prices and general discontent, promote abortion, homosexuality, lesbianism, witchcraft, cause the restriction of all firearms on some pretext with a view of confiscating them and leaving the population healthy. That is communism. Let me tell you what communists do. You wanna know when you've got a communist? This was the plan to ask Joseph Stalin to various communist district organizers in helping America self destruct. Religion, discredit all Christian creeds. What do we got today? We've got occult, occult cartoons, occult in the bookstores, and occult movies and occult videos. In the ethical era, corrupt morality by advocating promiscuity and degenerate perversion. During the early part of Bill Clinton's administration, under Jane Alexander, American taxpayers financed a 3 foot mount of synthetic excrement, a sculpture of 2 women engaging in oral sex, a film actually showing 1 man pushing his head into another man's rectum, a photo of a man with a bullwhip in his rectum, a film defecting Jesus Christ topless woman. Wake up. This is communism. Speaker 7: The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society. And we are as a people, inherently and historically, composed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restriction. Even today, there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those Speaker 8: commit to the Speaker 7: extent that it's in my control. And no official of my administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes, or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of Speaker 9: influence, Speaker 7: on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of army by bay. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissent is a silence, not praise. Its dissent is a silence, not praise. Its dissent is a silence. Its dissent is a silence. Its dissent is a silence. Speaker 9: Council on Foreign Relations is supposedly just a think tank addressing the issues that face America. But the Council on Foreign Relations is a front for the secret society that Cecil Rhodes created in 18/91. It pursues his goal of creating a world government where there'd be no more wars, there'd be no more hunger, there'd be no poverty. Everything would be wonderful, and people would live happily ever after. That was basically the dream that Cecil Rhodes had. The Royal Institute For International Affairs has worked closely with the monarchy. Parliament over the in England is simply a front. They don't make the decisions. However, the Council on Foreign Relations is no longer the primary organization. Basically, the existence of this organization was concealed, very few people knew about it. David Rockefeller controls 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars for 15 years pursuing this globalist program, decided they needed another organization, the Trilateral Commission. And the Trilateral Commission was not only American, it was international. It is a small elite group made up of bankers and financiers and educators who believe in this concept of world government. England and America always work together and put into positions of power, dictators who will go along with this idea of world government. And we've recently seen them topple the government of Egypt, of Tunisia, of Libya. They've done it in Iraq. They've done it in Afghanistan. They create war after war after war because they want to bring about world peace. From 1977 to 2004, every President of the United States and or Vice President of the United States sometimes both has been a member of the Trilateral Commission that was from 1977 to 2,008. That would be Jimmy Carter, his Vice President Ronald Reagan's Vice President George Herbert Walker Bush, member of the Triologic Commission Bill Clinton and Al Gore Dick Cheney was a member of the TriLateral Commission. George W. Bush was not a member. Barack Obama is not a member of the trilateral commission. Barack Obama picked 11 of them, to actually surround him. Hillary Clinton is not a member of the Triologic Commission, but her husband was. Speaker 10: We get a lot of advice from the council, so this will mean I won't have this far Speaker 11: to go to, be told, what we should be doing. Speaker 9: And The Triological Commission controls the American government. Now the American people don't know that. Certainly, when Hillary Clinton announced that she was going to resign and Barack Obama suggested we put in Susan Rice as the Secretary of State. Susan Rice came to the membership roles of the TriLateral Commission, discredited because of some remarks she made. So they picked another person for the Secretary of State in the United States. His name is John Kerry. I did never guess where he came from. Senator John Kerry, remember the trilateral commission. The elite rule America. They rule England. They rule the world today. You can go to their website attrilateral.org and where, of course, you can see their logo. It's made up of circle with 3 curved arrows. If you look closely, you'll see there's 6s. You'll see the 666 joined together in the center by an upside down broken cross. This is an occult organization. Cecil Rhodes was involved in the occult. The people who joined with him in this pursuit of a world government were involved in the occult. And it is these occult organizations, both the Council on Foreign Relations and the Triologic Commission, which are the major force behind this move towards world government. And if you're coming at this from a Christian point of view, you realize, of course, it's been prophesied for 1000 of years. We would establish a world government. We would reconstitute the government that to reach the heavens. He wanted to replace God with to reach the heavens. He wanted to replace God with a one world government under his control. And of course, that failed. This movement continues today. There were secret societies at the time of Nimrod. There were secret societies today. There really is a mystical world out there. There's a supernatural world. There really are supernatural forces. Speaker 11: Sarah McKechnie is taking her professional Speaker 12: Lucifer Lightbearer was a good name for their fledgling publishing company when they started to publish the books that Alice Bailey was writing, the books they saw as bringing light to humanity. But within 2 or 3 years, they decided to change the name of the company to Lucis Publishing Company, Lucis being from the same Latin term meaning of light, trust of light publishing company of light, and that's the name we've had since about 1925. Now the reference to Lucifer comes from Blavatsky's, description of Lucifer in the accurate sense of the term, which is of Latin origin. It means literally light bearer. So Lucifer to Blavatsky was one of the great sacrificial beings who descended to Earth. That's where we get the idea of the fall, fall of the angels. That was the descent of the solar angels to earth as an act of sacrifice on our behalf. Speaker 11: But is it not so that Lucius Trust, Alice Bailey, was looking for specifically the prophet Maitreya? Speaker 12: The Maitreya is a being, an entity. Entity. We're told that when this entity, this avatar returns, that he will bring humanity a new understanding of the spiritual will. But first, we have to demonstrate that the energy of love is sufficiently anchored in human consciousness to make us able to bear a greater spiritual will. You can imagine a powerful will without sufficient love would be wrongly used. You can imagine a powerful will without sufficient love would be wrongly used. Speaker 13: I'm sure you can see straight away that this is an androgynous performer. This is part of the agenda and the the fallen are androgynous. But this is Baphomet and you'll see that Baphomet is androgynous. We've got the female breast and the male phallic here. This is work by Alice Crowley. This is Baphomet again with the wings like the phoenix And, also, remember you saw this at the Olympics, at 2012 link Olympics about the rise of the phoenix as well. And now you see that she's gained wings in the background, flame wings. Once I transform, This is hell, guys. This is coming from hell. Speaker 14: Do you have any words at all? Speaker 15: I do. This night is dedicated to everyone who believes in a future of peace and freedom. You know who you are. We are unity, and we are unstoppable. Speaker 11: With the UN. How does your esoteric practice interface with the figures and policies of world government? It's a bit of a reaching question. Speaker 12: The UN isn't a form of government. It's a platform for the governments of the world to come together and try to work out in common ground a solution to problems. A fairly successful resolution might be the way they are approaching the problems in, the Middle East. Although, again, not everybody would agree with, say, the stand taken in Libya. Speaker 7: It is a big idea, a Speaker 8: new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind, peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Speaker 11: We came, we saw, we died. Did it have anything to do with your visit? I'm sure it did. Speaker 16: At a 1991 closed door meeting of fellow internationalists, billionaire and former CFR chairman David Rockefeller praised his media allies, but his confidence that his words would not leave the room was later broken. Speaker 17: We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other publications who as directors have attended our meetings and restricted their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our Speaker 1: plan for the world if we Speaker 17: had been subject to the right bites and publicity. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. Speaker 18: We don't want your world government. Leave Chile right now. Leave Chile. Okay? Leave Chile. Your brother is a privilege of all this disgusting in the world. You know? But you're afraid to Chile. Okay? You're afraid Speaker 7: We are as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings. Speaker 19: Now the main enemy is Freemasonry. Freemasonry claims it tries to make good men better men and it accepts only men of high moral character and it's an educational religious society they seek to improve the community. But what Speaker 7: they failed to tell the people Speaker 19: is that Masonry has another purpose. It's completely unknown to much of the public and many of the masons. Manley p Hall, a 33rd degree Mason said, quote, Freemasonry is a fraternity within a fraternity, an outer organization concealing an inner brotherhood of the elect. In the first degree, the initiate is asked the following question. What do you desire? In the 1st degree, he answers life. In the 2nd degree, he answers more life. In the 3rd degree, he answers further life. Speaker 18: But he's Speaker 19: led phase by phase through a series of blood oaths. Now Albert Pike, who's probably the most famous free mason of all time, he was a mason who simultaneously occupied 3 different positions. He was the head of Washington DC masonry. He was ahead of American Masonry, and he was ahead of World Masonry. Albert Pike wrote the book, Morals and Dogma, was published in 18/71. It's been called the most important book of Freemasonry. It's been called the Bible of Freemasonry. Albert Pike says in morals and dogma, quote, the mason is familiar with the doctrine that the supreme being is a center of light. And what is this light that the masons are talking about? Page 321, morals and dogma by Albert Pike. Quote, Lucifer, the light bearer. Lucifer, the son of the morning. Is it he who bears the light? Doubt it not, end quote. And on page 324, he repeats the thought. He says, quote, a devil, a fallen Lucifer or a light bearer. He identifies Lucifer as being the devil. The new agers believe the same thing as the Masons. Manley p Hall wrote the book, The Lost Keys of Freemasonry. He says this, quote, when the mason learns the key is the proper application of the dynamo of living power. He has learned the mystery of his craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands, end quote. So the masonic writers are telling them, oh, they can seal up worship of Lucifer from the rest of the masonic lodge. In the 28th degree, the symbol, this is for the the degree night of the serpent. It has a snake biting its tail. And what looks to be a friendly person, but you look in the reflection here as you can see, if you turn around, it's a demon. And that's important because outer pipe says, quote, that which is above is as that which is below, end quote. The house of the temple in Washington DC, which is where freemasons get received their 33rd degree. You have to be chosen to be a 33rd degree. Freemasonry, quote, this star represents good when represented with one point upward. The page reads on this quote, but when turned with one point down, it represents evil, end quote. The pentagrams were the biggest symbols and and signals. Speaker 20: Well, in the French case, they organized a huge exhibition in Paris on, the evils of freemasonry as a conspiracy. And, likewise, in Britain, they would have barged into big masonic lodges and confiscated all the paraphernalia. They might confiscated all the paraphernalia. They might well have made a big exhibition of all this stuff in the guild hall with all sorts of photographs and information and line charts showing this great sonic network allegedly running Britain and pointing out how many cabinet ministers or whatever were masons. And, they were trying to sell that to the population saying, look here, you idiots. You've been then governed for years by 200 sort of leading freemasons or something. Speaker 21: The Sundar Fundungus List GB or Black Book named 2,820 individual enemies of the Reich who were to be hunted down and eliminated once Britain had been occupied. All the members of the British government and the civil service were on the list, but the remainder were the cream of Britain's intellectual and literary elite. With these detailed lists, British freemasonry would have been eradicated, just as it was in the Channel Islands. Speaker 22: It was on the morning of 27th January 1941 that squads of special troops, professional wreckers, arrived here at the Masonic Temple in St. Helier, and set about a systematic looting and pillaging of this beautiful building. Splendid library and museum. And as the splendid library and museum. And as photographs which are taken at the Liberation show, the damage inflicted was horrendous. It was state vandalism. Speaker 19: The Masons also use masonic timetable system. They don't use AD. They use AL. A l is their their standard of the calendar system. It means ano lusis, and that means in the year of light. It could also be interpreted to mean in the year of Lucifer. And you can also find AL at the on the cornerstone and at the engraved date of any cornerstone made by the Mason. The Masons definitely believe in symbology and numerology. They have a fascination with the number 33. Masonic Encyclopedia says that Charleston, South Carolina was selected as the first home of the council of the 33rd degree Masonic Lodge. Major events that have happened on the 33rd degree latitude, it's where the first nuclear bomb was tested, Trinity site, New Mexico. And the monument chosen to commemorate this site was an obelisk, which is a Masonic symbol. The 33rd degree latitude also passes over both Hiroshi and Nakasaki, Japan. These sites were the place where the first two bombs, atomic bombs, were dropped at the end of World War 2. Truman was a 32nd degree mason when he dropped the bombs. In October of 1945, he became a 33rd degree mason. But the most astonishing incident that has occurred on the 33rd degree latitude of the map is a passage over the city of Dallas, Texas, where on November 22, 1963, JFK was assassinated. The president passed an obelisk is located right in front of the school book depository on the street where the president shot. But what we know as cremation came most recently from the order of the Knights Templar movement in 1300. Actually came before that, in the year 43 AD, from a group called the mysterious force. That's actually where freemasonry came from. This following information is is from a book called The Origin of Masonry. The mysterious force was established in 43 AD and it started when a counselor to King Herod Agrippa came to him and complained the followers of Jesus had a mysterious force. The purpose of this group was to attack the teachings of Jesus. Speaker 18: And that Speaker 19: they should establish their own mysterious force in order to preserve Judaism. King Herod of Burpia said quote, we will use the hammer because it was used to nail Jesus' hands and feet. Every session will be opened by striking the hammer 3 times in court. And you notice the judges have the hammer to bring order to the court. King Harry Burberry said, quote, we'll make degrees. These will be 33 symbolizing the age of the imposter. And on November 43 AD, the first official session was held in the First Temple of Jerusalem, which was a basement in the Palace of King Herod of Grepia. The meeting of the mysterious voice was always held in the temple. That was the name of the temple. And in 17/17, modern freemasonry changed it to the name of Lodge. To prove that Masonry is of Jewish origin, they're the following quotes. The Rabbi Isaac Weiss wrote in 1855, quote, Masonry is a Jewish institution whose history degrees assignment signs and explanations are of Jewish nature from beginning to end. End quote. Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism in 18/97 in Switzerland said quote, masonic ladders are established all over the world to offer us help to achieve our independence. Those pigs and non Jewish masons will never understand the final objects of masonry. End quote. Speaker 23: President Barack Obama concludes his 3 day trip to Israel today, and it began early with a trip to Mount Herzl where he laid a wreath on the tomb of Theodor Herzl, the Zionist visionary who imagined the state of Israel, but who died 40 years before it came into being. Speaker 19: Those pigs and non Jewish masons will never understand the final objects of Masonry, unquote. Also, in the Jewish encyclopedia, there's no criticism of socialism or communism and they're in fact, they say that they're instrumental in founding and making socialism flourish. In fact, Jewish international bankers financed the Russian revolution. Now going back to what all this spring masonry is is rooted, and it's rooted in the Jewish Kabbalah. The Kabbalah is a Hebrew word for received tradition. The Jewish Kabbalah is a medieval Jewish book of a cult philosophy and magic based on mystical interpretations of the old testament. Kabbalah is important with magicians, sorcerers, witches, satanists, as well as masonic philosophers. And all the things that I just mentioned that are rooted, talked about freemasonry. It gets back and is rooted in the Jewish Kabbalah. Both Morals and Dogman has 60 5 pages dealing with the Kabbalah. Page 741 of morals and dogma says this quote, Mason raises search for light. That search leads directly Speaker 24: back to the Kabbalah. Speaker 19: What is your problem? Speaker 25: Just that, sir. Okay. Speaker 26: I'm a Christian, sir. I'm pure and Speaker 19: virtuous and wholesome and innocent. Speaker 8: How can you say anything about about me? Speaker 25: Sir, you need to be born again. Speaker 7: I am born again. Speaker 18: Is Speaker 25: that did you just say that you're Lucifer? Speaker 24: I am Lucifer. Speaker 25: Can you find Lucifer for me? Speaker 19: Pure, virtuous, wholesome, innocent individual Speaker 8: that's out to help people. Speaker 25: Lucifer is? Yeah. This say that again. Lucifer is a pure, holy. Virtuous. Virtuous. Now see the Lucifer that God created? Speaker 16: That's the same one. Speaker 25: Oh, man. This is great. Speaker 16: God bless you, brother. Speaker 25: Because that's exactly what the Shriners and Masons teach us. This is what, Mason confesses. It's that Lucifer is light. Speaker 16: Lots of songs, Speaker 18: he could really play. He was good. Speaker 0: I don't mean I don't mean Speaker 27: You can't help people. You can't save souls. No. Speaker 18: No. No. Speaker 27: No. Yes. Speaker 28: You'll never Speaker 8: make it. Speaker 27: How can a how can a devil save souls? Speaker 0: Tell me what else. Speaker 27: What are you talking about? Amen. Man, I got the devil in this. I didn't have I'd be a Christian. Speaker 16: I'm Christian minded, but I'm not living it. Now I regret that I don't. I regret that I haven't, but I know I should have. Speaker 29: He was playing at some party or something, and it was like a whole different guy. You hear those stories about the bluesmen they go out to the crossroads and sell their soul to the devil and come back all of a sudden able to do stuff, Robert Johnson, Tommy Johnson, that whole mythology was one of those kind of deals almost. When he left Minneapolis, he was just average. You know, there was 5, 6 other guys doing the same thing. When he came back, he was doing woody, and he was doing band rock, and he was fingerpicking. He was playing cross harp. And this is a matter of a couple of months. I mean, this is not like he was gone, you know, a year or anything. Speaker 16: That's when I went to the crossroads and made a a big deal. You know, like, yeah. One one night and then, went back to Minneapolis and I was like, hey. Where's this guy been? Speaker 18: You Speaker 16: know? He'd been to the crossroads. Why do you still do it? Why are you still out here? Well, it goes back to the destiny thing. You know, I made a a bargain with it, you know, a long time ago, and I'm holding up my hand. What was your bargain? To get where I am now. Speaker 30: Should should I ask who you made the bargain with? Speaker 16: With with with with, you know, with the chief, chief commander. On this earth? In this earth and in, and then in a world we can't see. Speaker 31: And this being, through his wife, kind of a channeling type operation, brought forth a book that was called the book of the law in 1904. And this book declared that the slain and risen god, I. E, Jesus, had stepped off the throne and that a new god, the crown and conquering child, was taking his place. In fact, he was a brilliant genius. He was an accomplished poet, mountaineer, painter, writer. He had so many masonic degrees that you could fill up 5 pages of a book with them. This guy was probably the most highly honored Mason in the world, and he was also the most dangerous man of the 20th century. Speaker 17: The intro to sergeant Peppers, it says 20 years ago today, sergeant Pepper taught the band to play, and that was 20 years ago today that to that day that Crowley passed away. So 6/47 was when he died, and I guess the album came out in 'sixty 7. So and Landon himself was a known occultist. He was he would constantly go to to a cult bookstores in New York City, and, you know, had some of his his writings, Imagine, and, you know, all these other songs and stuff reference a lot of cold subjects. Speaker 32: Imagine there's Speaker 33: I'm really kinda shy. Not really shy, but more reserved and nothing like Sasha. But I guess I wouldn't be very entertaining on stage, so Sasha comes out, and she's fearless. Woah. Woah. You know, she can she can do things that I cannot do when I'm in rehearsal. I mean, I can try, but then it just doesn't happen. I can sing notes and sing strong and do all these things that when I'm just by myself, I can't do. And I remember right before I performed, I raised my hands up, and it was kinda the first time I I felt something else come into me. Speaker 34: Roman is a crazy boy who lives in me. I think he was born out of rage. He was conceived in rage. So he bashes everyone. He threatens to beat people and he's violent. Speaker 35: That must be nice to have, like, an ignorant loud mouth who you can just sort of blame every Speaker 34: He wants to be blamed. I don't wanna blame him. I'm like, I I asked him to leave, but he can't. He's here for a reason. People have brought him out. People conjured him up. Now he won't leave. Speaker 0: Do you think you're going to get to heaven? Speaker 1: No. I don't want to. Speaker 0: You don't want to? Speaker 1: No. Hell is much better. Speaker 8: Right now, we're in downtown Toronto. Young and davenport, and as Speaker 36: you can see, I'm in front of a Speaker 8: Masonic temple. But that's not all it is. Check this out. Speaker 14: The whole idea of celebrity and fame has become really convoluted and, you know, kinda bastardized, like, whereas fame used to be the byproduct of success, and now it's the ultimate goal. And you if your if your ultimate goal is to be famous, then you're gonna do a lot to do to get there, like sign your name in blood in a contract with the devil. Like, you're gonna end up in a on a one way street, and it's going nowhere. Like, that's just the truth. I've seen I've seen so many people, like, forsake their their their moral code and their value systems just for a little bit of fame, and it's it's not worth it at the end of the day. It's really not worth it. Speaker 24: This is the temple of death. The temple is the only international satanic religious institution fully recognized by the United States government. Speaker 8: Now here, we have a picture of John Paul the second hand in hand with the communist 33rd degree Mason Nelson Mandela. Nelson Mandela is absolutely annihilating anything that even remotely looks like Christian in South Africa. This ethnic cleansing that you're hearing about is Christian cleansing throughout the world. Flock together. Now here he is sitting on a par at a synagogue at a Jewish temple. These things have never been done before, have never been seen before. What is he doing? The Jews killed Christ. Can you read the bible? So now you're gonna go out and be buddy buddy with binai breath. Now here he is receiving the binai breath, March 22, 1984. And down below, here he is meeting with members of the Trilateral Commission, steering committee, male members of the Council on Foreign Relations, a bunch of Marxist hoodlums made up of people like Zigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller, and CEOs, Henry Kissinger, quite a little gang. Speaker 17: I mean, memorandum of 200. Uh-huh. Why why why are you afraid to talk about your depopulation plan? Speaker 1: Why don't you get lost? Speaker 17: Why don't I get lost? It's serious. Speaker 19: Daughter. That's the Speaker 18: way for the question. Speaker 32: So now look at this. Speaker 27: Look at this. That's a song. Speaker 28: You're not gonna Speaker 18: have yourself Speaker 8: with Russia. Speaker 29: China. There will be no new old daughter. Speaker 32: Barack Obama, your new old daughter will never come in. Speaker 8: K. This is a picture of Vladimir Lenin. This is the individual whose philosophy the United Nations support. But let me tell you just a little bit about the United Nations. The fact of the matter is when he stands at the United Nations and just stands there and has his picture taken, he is validating that organization. And the United Nations, my friends, is right out of the pit of hell. The people who are, hanging out at the United Nations are just simply in a nutshell, one word. They're Speaker 18: Luciferian. Speaker 8: The reason they're doing it, they are promoting the philosophy and the religion of the antichrist. Speaker 37: You said about the pope in the last segment, the so called pope. That kinda struck me as interesting since you are father Jack Ashcroft. Do you not agree that this is the pope? Speaker 38: No. I do not. He is what we call an antipope. As a response to the 2nd Vatican Council and the modernism that issued forth from that, the false teachings, the false practices, there was a response by certain members of the clergy, including Cardinal Ottaviani, to the changes that the Vatican 2nd Vatican Council was implementing, demonstrating how they undermine the faith, they undermine the foundation of the gospel of Christ, and they literally created a new religion. And, by way of demonstrating that, it's interesting to note that the new mass that is celebrated in most of what's called Catholic churches today is called the Novus Ordo Maisai, the new order mass. Kinda interesting that What? Little bit of connection. Yes. It is actually called the Novus Ordo Mesai. So a growing number of clergy responded by saying we do not accept these changes, we are not going in this direction. And as a matter of fact, the pope who is agreeing to this has become a manifest heretic, and we cannot agree that he is the pope any longer. And thus was born a movement called sedevicantism, meaning vacant. In other words, the seat of the Bishop of Rome is empty. From John 23rd, who was a Freemason, which automatically excommunicated him, down to pope Francis. None of these men are Catholic, and none of these men can even claim to be Christians in any sense of the word. They are modernists. They are heretics. They are globalists. And so when I say the so called pope, it's because of that. And and Catholics listening to this need to understand there is grave doubt using the Novus Ordo rights is even valid. H is going to heaven, even even talking about homosexuality is acceptable, etcetera. I mean, these are all the logical ends of the 2nd Vatican Council. Speaker 39: We want to show you some extraordinary pictures which came to us from the Vatican on what was, of course, an extraordinary day. Within hours of pope Benedict announcing that he was to resign, take a look at this, lightning struck Saint Peter's facility. You can see it again now in slow motion. Extraordinary. It happened just before 6 o'clock in the evening, local time. Speaker 16: And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven. Speaker 37: Would you say then because of the the direction that it's going and because of the occupancy of that position by somebody who is evidently not qualified to hold that position, that it's of a satanic influence? Because I would think if I was Satan, man, that would be a a great coup d'etat right there to put somebody who's not qualified in that suit. Speaker 38: Even all the sticks with the heretic himself, he proclaimed the smoke of Satan has entered the church. Wow. Pretty serious proclamation. Speaker 37: So do we see this current pope leading people in a satanic way? I mean, as an exorcist who's been doing this for a long time, do you see similarities between what the current pope is doing and what you see in symbology or or acting out in the the demonic realm? Speaker 38: I will say this, that Francis is promoting the same agenda that the globalists are. Philosophy rooted in occultism. Therefore, I would say anyone who remains in the Novus Ordo church, who continues to follow the hierarchy of the Novus Ordo, Their soldiers are in danger because they are following program of Satan at this point. He was ordained at the Novus Ordo rights. So the chances are he is not even a valid priest, which means he cannot be the pope. Even if he were validly ordained by virtue of his teachings and their extreme departure from traditional Christian doctrine and morals and ethics. He is no longer a Christian. He's become a false teacher. He's a heretic. Speaker 37: So what do you make of then his his rapid popularity growth? He's rallying Catholics. Speaker 38: Well, yeah. Look at the Catholics he's rallying though, and look at the people who are labelling him. It's the progressive media who loves him. It's the gay lobby who loves him. You're not looking at Christians who are seeking to be faithful to the teachings of the gospel, faithful to the teachings of the church. What you're seeing are the radical elements of the church who are flocking to this man and the radical elements in media and society who are supporting this. And so, of course, he's going to have a degree of popularity. These people are lauding him because he's promoting their agenda. Speaker 37: Should we be afraid of the power that he's starting to accumulate then? Speaker 38: Absolutely. It's a very real and very frightening player on the, world scene. Speaker 2: 2 children joined pope Francis for his weekly prayer from the people apartments. The used the service to call for peace and reconciliation in Ukraine. And to symbolize this, the children released 2 white doves into the air. But as they took off, one was attacked by a passing seagull while the other was repeatedly pecked by a Speaker 18: crow. Speaker 2: It's not known what happened to the Delfs after the incident. Speaker 32: He's an absentee landlord. Worship that? Never. I've nurtured every sensation man has been inspired to have. I cared about what he wanted, and I never judged him. Why? Because I never rejected him in spite of all his imperfections. I'm a fan of fan of man. I'm a humanist. Maybe the last humanist. Who in their right mind, Kevin, could possibly deny the 20th century was entirely mine? Speaker 18: All of it, Kevin. All of it. My Speaker 40: I'm picking it. It's my time now. Speaker 37: Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization. Speaker 30: That whole section of ancient Europe was ruled over by a priesthood called the Druids. And the Druids were ministers, the priest, the judges, the lawyers, they were the religious leaders. So there was a priesthood that dominated Europe. It still does. And America is a Druidic country. Unless you understand the Druidic system, then you're never gonna figure out what's going on in America and England. Speaker 28: How cool is this? Speaker 36: It is spectacular. Spectacular, isn't it? Yeah. Speaker 41: It's interesting. When I was flying over, it didn't seem that big, and so you kind of thought, oh, Speaker 38: but when you actually are there, Speaker 41: it's a special place. Speaker 36: The name United Nations was coined by United States president Franklin D Roosevelt, and was used in the declaration by United Nations of January 1942 during the 2nd World War when representatives of 26 nations pledged their governments to continue fighting together against what they called the axis power. So it officially came into existence on the 24th October 1945, when the charter was ratified by China, France, Soviet Union, United Kingdom, United States, and by a majority of the other signatories, and every 24th October, they celebrate this founding of the United Nations. Al Gehis, he became the acting secretary general of the establishment of the United Nations. The April 16, 1945 issue of Time Magazine called him one of the state department's brighter young men. It was his and Joseph e Johnson who later became secretary of the Bilderbergers. So here we have all the secret societies again who wrote much of the United Nations charter. So very high freemasons, Bilderbergers, were responsible for this charter. Patterning it after the constitution of Russia and the communist manifesto. But the constitution of the USSR is almost identical to the constitution of the United Nations, for those who did not know that. Winston Churchill, the creation of an authoritative world order is the ultimate aim towards which we must strive, and the United Nations formed part of that. Charles de Gaulle, who was also instrumental, nations must unite in a world government or perish. So the big figures involved had this philosophy. Then there is a man. I don't know how to pronounce his name. Triggers Lee. The first official UN secretary general was a high ranking member of Norway's social democratic party, which was, by the way, an offshoot of the 3rd communist international and then came a man, Doug Hammerskotz. And he was the 2nd secretary general. He was a Swedish socialist. He openly pushed communist policy. He was the secretary general of the United Nations from 10 April 1953 to 1961, then he met his death in a plane crash. Now what did he do in the United Nations? Well, one of the first things he did was to produce or create a prayer room. And there it is on the left hand side, stone in the middle of the room was placed to tell us we may see it as an altar empty, not because there is no God, not because it is an altar to an unknown God, but because it is dedicated to the God who man worships under many names and many forms. The meditation room is shaped as a pyramid, a trapezoid. The meditation room faces north northeast. To enter the room, one must proceed from darkness into light. Indeed, the middle order of the satanic brotherhood is called the order of the trapezoid. And Anton LaVey, who is the founder of the church of Satan, refers to an occult principle known as the law of the trapezoid. So we seem to have a very awkward room here. And then came, the 3rd secretary general, and he was a Marxist. So here you can see how the philosophy in the beginning was programmed. The new age agenda was to merge God and nature. That's what Tylad Deshardins, the father of the philosophy of the UN said. We must become pantheistic, eradicate male female distinction, world peace, nuclear disarmament, one world government, one world religion. The organizations leading up to this, the United Nations, of course, Council of Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergers, Gorbachev Foundation, and the Club of Rome. And they've already put up a constitution which is known as the Constitution for the Federation of earth. The former director of the World Health Organization, Doctor Brock Chisholm, of course, that's also a United Nations Organization, says, To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism. Loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religion start with us. Your individualism must go, you must become a number. Is this Marxism? The state is supreme, and you are nothing but the catechumen, a guile, or nothing. UNESCO is a suborganization of the United Nations. Julian Huxley is the former director of UNESCO. He was humanist of the year. He's a theistic philosopher, a member of the Communistic Colonial Bureau of British Fabian Society, and signer of the Humanist Manifesto 2. Niebuhr is UNESCO's cofounder, and he signed. What is? This is these are the founders. It is the position of that contraceptive services should be available to all, including minors, who should enjoy the same rights of free and independent access to contraceptive care as do others. It is the position of that the use of explicit sexual material, sometimes referred to as pornography, can serve a variety of important needs in the lives of countless individual. Under Huxley's guidance, they prepared a guide for teachers. Now I would like the parents to take a note. What is the United Nations guidebook for teachers? In the classroom with children under 13 years of age, Before the child enters school, his mind has already been profoundly marked, often injurously by earlier influences, first gained, however, dimly in the home. So UNESCO's aim is to change the mindset of your children to turn it against any values that the parents might instill in the mind of their child. On page 8, the teacher is told, the kindergarten or infant school has a significant part to play in the child's education. Speaker 42: Now we have sex ed in kindergarten? This week, 100 of outraged parents showed up at a school board meeting in Ellena, Montana, carrying signs upset about the school district's plans for a new sex ed curriculum. Again, starting with kids as young as 5, teaching them about body parts, proper terms. Here's a few of them. Penis, vagina, nipples, testicles. For a 5 year old and you move on to 1st grade, talk about same sex love, 5th grade, options for sex including anal penetration. That's a 10 year old. Speaker 36: Guess when kids go to school in England, age 3. Speaker 42: And on the phone, a parent in the district, Brian Ackerman has 3 young daughters, what, what, a 1st grader, 3rd grader. You're gonna have a kindergartner next year. Brian, your reaction to think that your little girls might be taught this, especially, your youngest who's gonna be a kindergartner soon. Speaker 43: You know, right now, my reaction, Mike, is the, I guess, it's the the lack of somebody that stepped up and said, the age appropriate ness of this has been established by x, and x's qualifications are. More so right now, it seems that the material's been introduced, and the people that brought the curriculum together as a group decided, well, at this point, it's age appropriate. And we really haven't seen where that age appropriateness comes from. You know, who what's the impetus? What's the driving factor? What's who decides this? When do they decide it? And how do they decide it? Right. Speaker 42: Well, let's ask doctor Bruce Messinger. Bruce, that's a bit seems to be a big question here. Who's deciding age appropriateness? Did you have parents involved as you're putting together this curriculum? Speaker 24: Our process was that, as a part of the revamping of the curriculum is that we, looked at what we had place presently, looked at our practices within the district and we also looked at national guidelines, national health standards, looked at the guidelines for sexual education, which were developed by a diverse set of organizations. And also, looked at the American Academy of Pediatrics advice they would give on what would be age or developmentally appropriate to be introduced to children at different stages from elementary to middle school and high school. So we took guidance from that, as well as committee members that were pretty representing, some included parents. Yeah. Speaker 42: K. Brian, there was the answer for you. A lot of different sources. Is that good enough for you or, not specific enough? Speaker 43: Right now, it's not specific enough. I I would like to see someone at at some point step up and say, this is the group that established it. Speaker 36: What about these world religions? Now this is the crux of the matter. Now this is a very interesting man, Robert Miller. He's the former assistant secretary general to the United Nations. He wrote, we must move as quickly as possible to a one world government, a one world religion, and a one world leader. Robert Miller writes, the underlying philosophy upon which the Robert Miller School is based will be found in the teaching set forth in the books of Alice a Bailey. So the philosophy is based on Luciferian channeled writings preparing for the coming of Lucifer. No human force will ever be able to destroy the United Nations. For the United Nations is not a mere building or a mere idea. It is not a man made creation. This is Robert Miller speaking, former undersecretary general of the United Nations. If it wasn't man made, then who made it? At his choice hour, the absolute supreme will ring his own victory bell here on earth through the loving and serving heart of the United Nations. Speaker 44: Celebration of the International Year of Light of 2015. And here is a very symbolic symbol of this light in the form of a snake going around her arm, and they refer to that as a hug from our oldest friend because that is a direct reference to Lucifer giving intellect to Eve in the Garden of Eden, and they're calling him an old friend. And there's some, iconography of Lucifer, the snake deceiving Eve and giving her the, knowledge of good and evil. Speaker 10: We turn our attention Speaker 18: back to the unraveling situation in Speaker 10: Haiti. Last Friday at approximately 3 in the morning, 400 Brazilian led United Nations occupation troops in armored vehicles laid siege once again to the impoverished community of Ciricel Soleil, including when UN troops shot a 6 months pregnant woman in the abdomen killing her unborn child, and families were shot in their beds when helicopter gunships fired into their homes. Speaker 45: We understand that more than 350 troops, went into the seaside shantytown at 4 a. M. In the morning. They went in shooting, firing, heavy caliber. We heard that M50s were being fired from helicopter gunships down at the community. Total mayhem. Young children, pregnant women, being killed, gunned down by by the United Speaker 46: Nations. What the UN has said that there were no noncombatants who were killed during that raid, that they only fired, returned fire after being fired a ponge, which you see are unarmed civilians who are victims of headshots. Headshots, of course, are meant to kill. The unarmed civilians that we see bleeding to death in this footage are clearly unarmed. Speaker 45: So remember, with the way in which these massacres are similar to 2 1,005 is that when the United Nations goes into this community, they don't bring medical units. Why? Because they are not going in to injured people. United Nations is going in to kill people. And as you said, this is collective punishment. It is retribution for their holding out and resisting what they call and what they consider a United Nations military occupation of their country. Speaker 30: Here's the way they look at it. Adam and Eve were held prisoner in the Garden of Eden by an unjust, cruel, and vindictive god until the Lucifer, through his agent, Satan, set man free from this garden by giving him the gift of intellect. Through the use of intellect, man will conquer the earth, will conquer nature, and will himself become God. It's taught in every masonic temple in this land. Every secret brotherhood, every secret society, every mystical temple, every occult organization teaches the Luciferian philosophy. Speaker 32: Basically, what I did was got on my knees and sort of communicated with the spirits. And when I came out, I was in charge. Speaker 30: A powerful scene. Speaker 32: A powerful scene. It it would I couldn't have acted that. Speaker 0: While it's called the Pandora box, it's because everybody there is like a masquerade. They have masks on. They have androgynous there. They have she's. They have women dressed like men. I mean, you name it, it's there. And all the top Hollywood actors, models, singers, hip hoppers. You name it. It's there. My god. I can't believe I can be a part of that. Or what what you mean can be a part of it? If you want your check, you want this Hollywood life, they sign right here. All the doors are opening. He ain't ready for what they're gonna hit them with. You are not to speak about this. Come on up and hit. No, man. I ain't down for that. Well, do you think we're gonna keep paying you $5,000,000 a year? Do you really think we're gonna keep putting your name in life? Either you do or we're gonna break you. What you mean you're gonna break? You? We're gonna take all your money out your account. Oh, man. I got my right. You ain't got no right. We decide who's gonna be a star, who ain't gonna be a star. We do all of those things. Ain't nobody no star. We decide who gonna be a star, who gonna be president. That's who we are. Now you know. Now you open. Now you see. Now you see sticking about the American Idol. Deeper than American Idol. Nobody in Hollywood gets a pass. Speaker 18: After Speaker 47: winning an Oscar, any actor should expect to get offers for the best parts in the best movies, but that's not the case with Monique who won best supporting actress in 2010 for her role in Precious. She says the movie's director, Lee Daniels, told her that she's been blackballed because she's difficult and didn't play the Hollywood game. Speaker 48: There were demands that were made from her, on the precious campaign that everyone knows about. That, that hurt her. And and I told her that. Speaker 47: Can she change that? Speaker 48: I mean, if she plays ball, you gotta play ball. Speaker 31: That's exactly what I'm asking. Speaker 48: That you have to please say. This is not Speaker 19: just show. It's show Speaker 8: business, and you've gotta play ball. Speaker 40: End up with penniless. He's conspiracy. The Jews do it on purpose. Speaker 7: Hollywood is run by Jews. It's owned by Jews. Speaker 17: In Inglourious Basterds, Christophe Waltz played a Nazi obsessed with finding Jews. Well, Christophe? Speaker 49: You have better side of Hollywood? Yep. There is no better side of Hollywood. You have to be Jewish to be in Hollywood. Speaker 0: You mean as a producer? At any level. Yeah. Any level. Speaker 26: How many people do you know personally who have died suddenly mysteriously in the past 5 years? I have personally known 8 actors, all of whom all of whom I have worked with and was close me. Heath Ledger, Chris Penn, David Garrardin. Speaker 0: What is the number one book that JC is studying on the day in and day out? Alice McCrawley. Every chef hop, every actor, the actress and model, every director, beat maker, that's somebody in the industry. They all have that focus like they're buying. Speaker 18: Astrology. Speaker 50: You're a big fan of astrology? Oh, yeah. Yeah. Does it have an effect on you? Speaker 30: I read my horoscope just this morning. Big things ahead for me in the next couple of days. Right. Speaker 51: And you've said before, Morgan, that you're you're a a man of God. When you did this and and and so many of these questions were posed. Speaker 50: When did I say I was Speaker 41: a man of God? Speaker 51: You're not? Speaker 9: No. No. No. No. No. No. Speaker 51: You're a man of faith. Speaker 40: Bye. Speaker 30: In the mystery schools, they refer to this mystical time of coming out of the age of innocence. This is what they teach in the lodges. And if you perfect yourself as the temple of the god within, you too can become god. Speaker 52: And suddenly, I was thrown into this expansive amazing feeling of freedom from myself, from my problems. I saw that I was bigger than what I do. I was bigger than my body. I was everything and everyone. I was no longer a fragment of the universe. I was the universe. Speaker 26: To say, I am god. Speaker 40: David, I can't say that. Speaker 46: See how little you think of yourself? Speaker 26: You can't even say the words. Speaker 40: I am God. Speaker 11: I am Speaker 26: God. A little louder, please, with maybe a little more conviction. Speaker 40: I am God. I am look. If I'm God, what does that make you? Speaker 26: Oh, we always see in others what we see in ourselves. I am god. Speaker 40: I am god. I am god. Speaker 30: We'd all love to be gods, wouldn't we? My question to Shirley MacLaine at one time was, please, Shirley, could you make me a universe? She sort of looked at me with this hurt look on her face as she confronted her mortality and realized that she was not god because she could not make the universe. She couldn't even make herself the universe. She can't even make herself look young again. Speaker 53: I actually have, friends in the in the entertainment business, and I'm I'm I'm personal friends with a, with a bodyguard who I'm not gonna mention in entertainment. And what happened, like like, for me, for instance, say that I wanted to move to, to Hollywood and start a career in in Hollywood and in entertainment. Speaker 26: For for you to Speaker 53: get to the level of, like, a, say, like, a Will Smith, that that comes at a price as a major lifestyle lifestyle change. All of a sudden, I could be a happily married man, but then by, you know, 10 years later after I'm I'm worth, you know, $50,000,000 $75,000,000 I, I'm involved in orgies with men. Speaker 17: Yeah. I I guess we shouldn't be surprised, Michael. The botry and this is something I've found from an investigative point of view. Satanic worship, and homosexuality, like it or not, folks, they're intertwined. Speaker 41: I wanna represent magic, right? That you're in a universe and 2+2 equals 4. 2+2 only equals 4 if you accept that 2+2 equals 4. 2+2 is going to be what I want it to be. You know, and there's a, there's a like, there's a there's a a redemptive power. Like, there's a there's a a redemptive Speaker 36: power. Speaker 42: This film's about cowboy meets cowboy. It's one of Speaker 19: the most forward attempts yet Speaker 42: by Hollywood to mainstream homosexuality. David Capellian, author of The Marketing of Evil. Speaker 54: It is very, very propagandist because the entire purpose of the movie is to make homosexuality seem like something good and appealing and to make people who are opposed to homosexuality seem to be bigots and homophobe. Speaker 28: The writer comes in. I think he's the writer. He's like, Dave, listen. You got this hilarious scene where Martin's sneaking out of jail, so he disguises you as Speaker 40: a prostitute. Speaker 30: And he Speaker 28: put this dress on and it What is it? Possibly no. I'm not doing that. I don't feel comfortable with it. That that should have been in a discussion. What? You don't feel comfortable Speaker 24: with it. Speaker 28: I mean, it's a hilarious bit. All the greats have done it. So, well, if all the greats have done it, it's kinda hacky. Speaker 18: Right? Speaker 28: You're right. So why don't we just not do it? Because I don't feel comfortable in addressing oh, come on, babe. Listen. Speaker 1: We we got it all set up. Speaker 28: We're supposed to shoot every every minute you waste costs us so much money. No. The pressure comes. Oh, gosh. That's so difficult. And then I started thinking about it. All the comics that I've seen, man, you know, strong brothers, why was why they putting us in these dresses? But the minute it was clear, I was adamant. I'm not wearing a dress. I'm not wearing a dress. Alright? Fine. Think of something else. That comes back 10 minutes later. It's a whole new scene. How damn? How did you write the scene so fast? You gotta take a sting. Speaker 50: Have you ever Speaker 17: ran into that with with scripts and and is this something that, you know, you wouldn't do, you know, for Speaker 55: definitely have ran into to put on the dress. I mean, you know, you you have to have you have to have boundaries. You have to have limits that you refuse to cross. You know, for me, I know what they are. Speaker 14: The new pope is 9 year old Oscar nominee, Capasanae Wallace. Speaker 55: You have to have you have to have boundaries. You have to have limits that you refuse to cross. You know, for me, I know what they are. Speaker 0: Believe I can't be a part of that. Or what what you mean in the part of? If you want your check, you want this Hollywood life? Sign on right here. Well, do you think we're gonna need $5,000,000 a year? Do you really think we're gonna need to put your name in life? We decide who's gonna be a star, gonna be rich, who gonna be poor. We do all of those things. Speaker 18: I can tell you Speaker 24: that the number one problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia. Speaker 44: The casting couch even applies to children. Oh, yeah. Speaker 24: Not in the same way. It's all done under the radar. Speaker 44: Nobody talks about pedophilia. Speaker 16: It's the big secret. Speaker 0: Either you do or we're gonna break you. What you mean you're gonna break? We're gonna take all your money out your account. Speaker 26: My wife, Abby, and I have been the victims of criminal activities perpetrated by a small network of individuals who are out to destroy us. This network of individuals is manipulating the banking system and the criminal justice system for the purposes of sabotaging our credit and our credibility. We are not criminals nor are we fugitives from justice, nor are we crazy. Speaker 28: What's going on? Why is Dave Chappelle going to Africa? Why does Mariah Carey make a $100,000,000 deal and take Speaker 7: a close off on TRL? Speaker 28: Is it a weak person cannot get to sit here and talk to you. Ain't no weak people talking to you. So what is happening in Hollywood? Nobody knows. The worst thing to call somebody is crazy, is dismissive. I don't understand this person, so they're crazy. It's bullshit. These people are not crazy. They're strong people. Maybe the environment is a little sick. Speaker 10: America and Israel share an unbreakable bond. Speaker 31: APAC is one of the Speaker 21: reasons why All of us share Speaker 17: a fundamental belief that the freedom and security of Israel are a vital interest in the United States and America. Speaker 51: We have heard that a half Speaker 6: a 1000000 children have died. I mean, that's more children than died when when in in Hiroshima. And and, you know, is the price worth it? Speaker 10: We think the price is worth it. Speaker 35: How is it possible that Israel can continue to get away with flouting international law even unto the most obscene levels of using things like white phosphorus on civilian populations, chemical weapons on civilian populations. In order to understand how Israel can get away with these things, we have to understand what is power in this world. And if you wanna understand power, then you need to know who controls the financial system, who controls the issuance of money. The bankers run the world quite famously. This is very well understood by those of us who understand the nature of power. And those who run the world have Israel as their favorite little play thing. They also happen to own the bankers who run the the financial system. They also happen to have bought off and paid for every prostitute who can be bought off in the governments of the world, in the mainstream media, and virtually every aspect of human society. So this is how Israel can get away with This is how Israel at the IAEA meeting this, this last Friday can get away with another pass and not have their nuclear plant, inspected, to not their nuclear arsenal inspected, to not have their chemical weapons arsenal inspected because they enjoy the favor of the entire world of the prostitutes who are bought and paid for by those who run the financial system. So until we change that financial system, Israel will continue to enjoy the benefits of being able to run rough shot over the world and get away with literally bloody murder. And it is this infected ideology of supremacism which has allowed the United States and its citizens effectively to sit by while we have committed one atrocity after another. If we go back to World War 2, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the firebombing of Tokyo, Dresden, the firebombing of Dresden was particularly hideous. We can go on to the Korean War and Vietnam War. In the Vietnam War, we dropped more bombs than all of World War 2 combined. 20,000,000 bomb craters created there. We killed probably 2 to 4000000, Vietnamese were Asians, Cambodians and Laotians as well. We have committed one crime after another. We have supported dictators like Suharto, Pinochet. We've, we've kidnapped many people around the world. We have a long list of crimes over and over again, and the only way that that was possible is because we subscribe to an ideology of supremacism. Israel is a nation state based with citizens who are infected with the supremacist ideology that makes them believe that they are, quote, chosen. And as chosen people, everyone else who is not chosen is effectively subhuman. Speaker 50: But I'll tell you one thing. Unlike America, Israel seems to be able to fight wars very quickly. What is your secret? Because we don't seem to have the hang of that. Speaker 16: The secret is that we have America. We have America. America. Speaker 4: I know you need ratings, but just hold it. Speaker 50: I have ratings. Speaker 4: I'm not saying we should be friends over there with anybody. I'm saying we should be objective. We have developed serious enemies from a one-sided policy. And, yes, I believe Israel through their through their lobby has manifested total power of the Congress United States. And my concern is that tax payers and the citizens of United States should control their government, not a foreign entity. Speaker 8: To suggest as you're doing here tonight that they control our congress, that, quote, they are influencing and the sole control of influencing of our domestic policy is an absurdity. It sounds like you are a kook. Speaker 4: John, I'm not suggesting it. I'm telling it. Speaker 26: Sir, I disagree with you and Israel, but, Speaker 50: In what way? You don't have to support it. Speaker 19: Because I just don't Speaker 26: think it's worth an American life or an American dollar. Speaker 50: You you don't think the existence of Israel in the world is worth an American life or an American dollar? Speaker 26: Not only Israel, sir, but Saudi Arabia or Kuwait or Bolivia. I I'm much Speaker 24: You really can't you're really Speaker 50: not telling me that Israel is on a par with Saudi Arabia. Speaker 26: What I'm telling you, sir, is I'm most interested in the survival of the United States. Speaker 50: But Israel is a democracy in a part of the world that has none. Speaker 26: What so what, sir? It doesn't matter to Americans if anyone ever votes again. Speaker 50: It doesn't Speaker 26: We'll get by we'll get by just fine, sir. Speaker 28: So you're Speaker 50: saying like back in 1973 when Israel's very existence was threatened in the Yom Kippur War and we did come to their aid, we shouldn't have done that, we shouldn't do it again? Speaker 26: What I'm saying, sir, is we should have revisited the situation after 1973 and not be the unqualified sole supporter of of of Israel at the moment. I think it earns America tremendous pain and increasingly dead Americans, fighting wars that are not ours to fight. Speaker 50: But Speaker 11: A deepening antagonism seems to be developing worldwide. Speaker 8: Today, I wanna talk about about a war that the mainstream media has ignored. There's a worldwide war on Christianity. I am concerned about this report about Syrian rebels and the ceasefire with ISIS. Senator That's not true. Speaker 18: This is Speaker 24: That's not true. Speaker 8: There's not a reason. Whether Speaker 24: I don't care about the report. I know these people intimately. We talk to them all the time. Speaker 0: We watch horrific images of Christians being beheaded, slaughtered, their throats slit, absolutely mowed down, shot in the back of the head. Speaker 24: I know these people intimately. We talk to them all the time. Speaker 35: It is beyond naive to suggest the US doesn't have its fingerprints all over ISIS. In fact, tell me this. Why has ISIS never once or Al Nusra Front or Al Qaeda, not once have they attacked Speaker 18: Israel. Speaker 56: The driving force behind the destruction of our Christmas traditions has been Jewish organizations and extremist Jewish activists. In fact, after they banned our Christian Christmas symbols from our schools and community property, they have inserted Jewish celebrations and symbols in its place. The nativity scenes are now banned, but right across from the White House on public land each year has erected the world's largest Jewish menorah. Speaker 30: Where we are no longer a Christian nation. We are no longer a Christian nation. Speaker 57: Britain today in practice is increasingly anti Christian. Many believe the architect of Britain's new anti Christian culture was former prime minister Tony Blair, who championed gay rights. By some estimates, it only took about 10 years to almost completely undermine Britain's Christian heritage. Barring a sudden move of god, it's likely to take far longer to restore it. Speaker 1: They did it. I have had long conversations over the past 2 weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at Headquarters Marine Corps, and I made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 911 was a MacVod operation. And what I what I showed them immediately afterwards, the 3rd building at the World Trade Center going down, w two two seven. Right. And they look at that, and I said, now you understand that if one of the buildings is wired for demolition, all of them were wired for Speaker 0: demolition. Speaker 1: And what Americans need to understand, they did it. They did it. And if they do understand that, Israel will flat out disappear from this earth. 911911 has led directly to 60,000 Americans dead and wounded. God knows how many hundreds of thousands of people in other countries that we killed or wounded or made homeless. If Americans ever know ever know that Israel did this, they're gonna scrub them off the earth, and they're not gonna give a rat's ass what the cost is. They are not gonna care. They will do it. The Zionists are playing this as as truly an all or nothing exercise because if they if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they're done. You know, it'll be a bloody brutal war, and they're gone. I mean, this is this is it's not even gonna be a close contest. Three buildings went down. The third was not hit by a plane. It was wired for controlled demolition. Therefore, all of them are wired for controlled demolition. You know, what I what I have done when I presented it to these people and I said, just look at this look at this picture. You know, don't I'm not gonna give you an argument. Just look at it. And they look at the film, and without exception, they come back and they say they did it then. They say, yep. They did they did 911. Speaker 40: When the first communist revolution in Russia failed and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany, Germany gave them refuge, and they were treated very nicely. And here, they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so called Jewish Commonwealth. All the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, they wrote in all their papers, and the press was filled with their statements intercession and bringing the United States into the war against them. Mhmm. And the intercession and bringing the United States into the war against them. Not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Hugo Schoenfeld, a Jew who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so called camps of political prisoners, and he wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, everybody treated well, and they were filled with communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews because the Jews happened to be maybe 98% of the communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there and masons and others who had international affiliation. The Jews tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany and that the Germans resented that. So they did take appropriate action against them. They discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. Jews of the world didn't know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended in July 1933, and they said to Germany, you fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a communist, no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are calling upon you and serving this other madam upon you. In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up, and mister Untermyer came back to the United States, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, and he went from the steamer to ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said, the Jews of the world now declare a holy war against Speaker 0: Germany. Speaker 40: We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans, and we are going to starve them in into surrender. We are going to use a worldwide boycott against them that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business. Naturally, the Germans said, why, who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work and our industries come to a standstill, who are they to do that to us? And they naturally resented it. Certainly, they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who is part of a boycott, who is going to starve Germany and to surrender the Jews of the world. After this thing got out of hand, Speaker 18: it was absolutely necessary Speaker 40: for the Jews and absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided Europe is going to be Christian or communist. There is no in between. It's going to be Christian or it's going to be communist. And the Germans decided, we're going to keep it Christian if possible, and they started to rearm. And their intention was, by that time, the United States had recognized the Soviet Union, which they did in November 19 33. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized, well, our turn is going to come soon unless we are Speaker 18: strong.
Saved - November 2, 2023 at 3:33 PM

@RealCapeTruther - MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS

Leaving the Matrix: Who controls the USA and the WORLD... They do. Who is they? https://t.co/8Qlt4xWDgT

Video Transcript AI Summary
You're here because you suspect something unexplainable. Who controls this country? They're everywhere, even in this room. Look out your window, turn on your TV, and see the truth. You're a slave, unaware to those who control you. You must see it for yourself. Choose the blue pill to believe what you want, or the red pill to join the controllers. I offer only the truth. Where am I? Is this Israel? Where's my wallet?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you suspect something that you cannot explain. Do you know what I am talking about? Who controls this country? Do you want to know who it is? They are everywhere, all around us, even now in this room. You can see them when you look out on your window. And especially when you turn on your television. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes To blind you from the truth. What truth? That you are a slave, Lauren. Cattle for the people that do not even know that you exist. A prison for your mind. Unfortunately, no one can just be told who they are. You have to see it for yourself. This is your last chance. You take the blue pill, and you wake up and believe what you want. You take the red pill, and you'll be among those who control your nation. Remember, all I'm offering is the truth. My head. Where am I? Am I in Israel? Where's my wallet?
Saved - July 7, 2024 at 3:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There is a belief that a ruling elite with immense wealth is driving a depopulation agenda. They manipulate public perceptions and conceal dark operations like human trafficking. The elite warn of a cyber attack that could collapse society, while triggering domestic terror attacks and biological warfare. We must uncover the true rulers and fight for #TeamHumanity before it's too late.

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

THREAD #Crisis2024 - Depopulation Agenda What catastrophic events await us going into 2024? Methods in the madness of the Malthusian Dynasty: ⬇️ https://t.co/lc96wBSNUL

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

Feel the unsettling shift in the air? Things grow stranger each day, but is it mere coincidence or a feeling validated by concurrent affairs? The true ruling elite, a death cult of pure evil, possess unfathomable wealth. Which poses the question: why crave more money and control? Their riches fuel a depopulation agenda, executed through power and wealth. This is no mere conspiracy; observe the world around you, where everything benefits them, not us: @elonmusk's recently termed 'team humanity'.

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

"Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature." - Georgia Guidestones. Globalists cloak their true intentions under the guise of climate change or perpetual global crises. They view us as parasites to be controlled and eradicated. They are an unelected cabal that manipulates public perceptions, using a model of plausible deniability to gaslight us, they mock us freely.

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

Throughout history, familiar agendas persist under different disguises, driven by the same goals. The elite, now openly revealing their agenda, extend beyond simple government corruption. The upper echelon harbors an anti-human and Luciferian agenda, leveraging threats of world war, they control dealings between governments; concealing dark operations like open-border drug and human trafficking, child trafficking, organ harvesting and the worst crimes imaginable.

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

They have a form of omnipotence, with a false self-perception of omniscience. Celebrities, politicians, CEOs revel in fame, but the true orchestrators are where this evil stems from. Many unwittingly join their ranks, unaware of the darkness concealed behind the scenes. https://t.co/6vyCSaWF8H

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

As humanity slumbers - distracted by reality TV and the left/right paradigm - the elite warn of a looming cyber attack, a digital 911 event capable of collapsing our world. The modern power grid's reliance on the internet is a huge vulnerability. An internet shutdown could plunge the world into chaos, a canvas upon which the elite could reset and rebuild for themselves. With their "Great Reset" and "Build Back Better" slogans softening up the masses.

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

Soon they will trigger domestic terror attacks and biological warfare, with each subsequent event tightening the grip of control. Time is running out; society stands at the crossroads. Will you sit idly by? https://t.co/3RvJs4RAAV

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

If you don't accept digital ID to login to the Internet you will be considered a Cyber Terrorist. If you don't accept CBDCs so that old people can receive their pensions in digital coupons you will be told you are killing grandmothers. We must unveil the true world rulers, and rationalise their motives to the wider population. The fight for #TeamHumanity begins now, and the clock is ticking. Our digital prisons await what's left of us...

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

Have a Happy New Year. For more content, visit @DecentraliseP Highlights. Where other THREADS cover topics such as the Khazars. Like, Share and Follow @DecentraliseP .

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 11:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss various topics related to power and control. They mention the influence of the royal bloodline in Europe, particularly House Wettin, and how they still rule key European countries. The CIA is portrayed as a ruthless paramilitary mafia that manipulates governments and presidents for their own agenda. The role of Britain in starting the Arab-Israeli conflict and the City of London's involvement in the secret world of finance are also highlighted.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

This is your Royal Death Racket enemy… 💯 (SEE THREADS BELOW👇🏼) https://t.co/9z0JyOr9i6

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Royals still rule us… how? 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Black Ops 101 — the Dark Truth about the CIA

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How Britain Started the Arab-Israeli Conflict

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"How Britain Started the Arab-Israeli Conflict" 👀 This is a must-watch with all that's happening... 💯 (suggested at 1.5x speed)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the origins of the Arab-Israeli conflict, tracing it back to British involvement in the Middle East during World War I. The British made conflicting promises to both the Arabs and the Jews, leading to a legacy of bloodshed and division in the region. The Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour Declaration were key factors in shaping the future of the Middle East. The video highlights the impact of these decisions on the establishment of Israel and the subsequent displacement of Palestinian Arabs. Overall, the video emphasizes the role of British double dealing and the consequences it had on the region.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The bitter struggle between Arab and Jew for control of the Holy Land has caused untold suffering in the Middle East for generations. It is often claimed that the crisis originated with Jewish immigration to Palestine and the foundation of the state Israel. Yet the roots of the conflict are to be found much earlier In British double dealing during the First World War, this is a story of intrigue among rival empires, of misguided strategies and of how conflicting promises to Arab and Jew created a legacy of bloodshed which has determined the fate of the Middle East. Speaker 1: During the First World War, the British, the French, and the Russians had these secret plans to carve up the Ottoman Empire, because they believed that would balance out their imperial ambitions, But tough luck for the Turks, the Arabs, and anyone else who got in the way. Speaker 2: Certainly, all the seeds were planted then In the sense that it was the British who promised the Arabs independence on the one hand And, a Jewish homeland on the other, and you could not simply reconcile one with the other. Speaker 3: The British scattered promises to anyone who might be of some use To them without thinking about the consequences. So British duplicity, British double dealing went a long way to perpetuate the conflict in Palestine. Speaker 4: At the end of the day, when you're fighting a war, you are very liberal in what you're offering in terms of a post war settlement. When you get down to the conference table when the war has ended and you have to start honoring your agreements, you then have to decide what's in your interest or not, and it puts all the Middle East as a western flag for their power in India and their power in Asia in general. Speaker 0: The story of Britain's involvement in the Middle East and the ensuing struggle between Arab and Jew begins with her colonial past. At the beginning of 20th century, King Edward the 7th ruled over a vast empire with interests in every part of the world. Speaker 4: India became increasingly important because it was the 2nd pillar of British power in the world. Moving the Indian Army about was extremely important in extending British interests and British influence across the globe. And the Suez Canal was, of course, the quick way To do that, it's very important for the British shared geopolitical position to ensure the Suez Canal remains safe and secure. Speaker 0: With this aim in mind, Britain had become the only European power to establish a major foothold in the Middle East, in the principalities around the Persian Gulf, in Aden, and in Egypt. Britain had annexed Egypt from Turkey's Ottoman Empire in 18 82. And by the time it was made a protectorate in 1914, Cairo had become the center of British power in the Middle East. The presence of imperial troops in the region was of vital strategic importance. For the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Mohammed But the 5th was an alliance with Britain's much feared rival, Germany. Together with the Austro Hungarian Empire, these countries made up the Central Powers and pitted against them were the 3 allies, Britain, France and Russia. From the Ottoman capital, Constantinople in Turkey. The sultan ruled over the last of the great Islamic empires. It had been an almost terminal decline for decades. Yet the fate of the Ottoman Empire was to be sealed by the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914. In Europe, Germany's rapid advance was halted by Britain and France along the Western Front. In the east, Russia's war against Germany and Austria Hungary also reached deadlock. The powerful weapons of the industrial age were killing thousands of men in the trenches of every army. Speaker 5: All of the leading powers expected the war to be over within a matter of months. So in that sense, all of them are surprised at the end of 1914, When not merely is the war going on, but it shows every sign of being likely to go on for a very long time. At that point, they began to think about new ways of winning the war. Speaker 0: Prime minister, Asquith, felt that with the stalemate in Europe, it was essential to widen the conflict. Together with foreign secretary Lord Grey, Minister for War, Lord Kitchener, and the 1st Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, they masterminded a complex strategy to undermine the Central Powers. Speaker 4: This was a global war, and the British saw the Middle East very much in a global context. The traditional British preference for sideshows, as people, unfavorably call it, the indirect strategy, The way of, attacking the soft underbelly, as Churchill called it, of the enemy. Speaker 0: And the soft underbelly was seen to be Turkey. Britain's secret plan involved, on the one hand, a military diversion, and on the other, a devious use of diplomacy through bribery, Subversion and double dealing, all these devices focused on the enemy's weakest link, Turkey's Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Diplomacy in general has always had a secret dimension to it. Whether where but where discretion ends and conspiracy begins is an open question. But during the period up to and during the First World War, there was a particularly intense set of negotiations and discussions between the major imperial powers, between the French, the Russians, and the British, in particular, cutting in the Italians as well about what would they do When the war was over and when the Ottoman Empire broke up. Speaker 0: The British government hoped that by striking a deal over the spoils of war, It would strengthen the alliance against the Central Powers. Amongst the allies, Russia had long sought access to the Mediterranean. In a secret treaty of March 1915, Britain and France offered What was to the czar a prize of vital geopolitical importance, Constantinople. Speaker 6: It is that key outlet into the wider world and into the Mediterranean. And it is the one thing, of course, the British and the French have been Attempting to prevent the Russians from achieving. So this is a complete. This is this is the British, the French, and the Russians Coming to an agreement over something which was, up to this point, almost inconceivable. Speaker 0: Italy's King Vittoria Emmanuel is another target for bribery. Britain, France, and Russia tried to tempt Italy, a pro German state, to join the Allies. In April 1915, a secret treaty offered Italy a substantial bit of Ottoman real estate in Anatolia. Speaker 6: Again, it's another power coming into the equation and being offered territorial advancement which in normal circumstances would have been quite inconceivable. Speaker 0: The bribe worked. Italy joined the Allies and declared war on the Central Powers in August 1915. But Britain's strategy to undermine the enemy via the Ottoman Empire also required subversion. By using domestic opposition to weaken, maybe even destroy it, Britain exploited a new movement sweeping through the empire. Nationalism. Speaker 1: Nationalism in the sense of believing that there are peoples with a clear cultural identity and that these people should live independent. That idea spread to the Middle East as to other parts of the world in the latter part of 19th century. So you had the beginnings in the Ottoman Empire of a Turkish nationalism. Speaker 0: This came to a head when the Young Turks power in a coup in 1908 and started to impose their language and culture on the Arabs of the empire. But this only reawakened an interest amongst Arabs in their own heritage. A 1000 years before, Arabs had brought the technology and literature of the East to the West. And their religion, Islam, had encompassed much of Asia, North Africa and Southwestern Europe. The idea of recovering that historic grandeur had remained in the consciousness of Arab intellectuals. By the start of the First World War, the antagonism between Arab and Turk had increased. Speaker 1: The very fact that the Turks were saying we want to have a unified empire meant the Arabs said, wait a minute. We're not part of this. So all of this Literary and nationalistic revival then took a much more political form, and therefore, you got the emergence of Arab nationalism. Speaker 2: They had arrived at the conclusion that remaining in the Ottoman Empire was becoming hopeless, this, that they couldn't actually share power with the Turks, and they began thinking of having their own Speaker 0: By the summer of 1915, British intelligence confirmed that the Arab nationalist movement was the breakthrough the government was looking for. Britain and her French ally Dispatched officers to send out Arab leaders. Speaker 2: Both the French and the British started, You could say seducing various local Arab leaders that if you side with us, we'll give you your independence, so why don't you leave the Ottomans? And various people were tempted as a result. If they they thought they could actually gain independence, why not Side with the Europeans against the Ottomans. Speaker 0: The idea was to tempt the Arabs into a revolt against their Ottoman overlords And create a diversion which would tie down the central powers in the Middle East. Ironically, the impetus for such a diversion had come not from London but from the Arab world. In the Hejaz in Western Arabia, sheriff Hussein, its ruler, was set on extending his political and geographical domain. He believed he might be able to do it with the help of the British. In turn, the British were impressed by Sharif Hussein's family credentials as custodians of the holy places of Islam. Speaker 1: They call themselves Hashemites. They call the family Hashemites because that's the family or the tribe of the prophet Muhammad. They were the Bani Hashim, the sons of Hashim. So he was Sharif Hussein was the leader of the Hashemites. He was the person responsible for Mecca and Medina. And although he worked with the Ottomans Before the First World War, once the First World War happened, he saw this was his chance. Speaker 0: A chance too for the British who saw support sheriff Hussein, as a way to threaten the sultan's hold on the caliphate, the political leadership of the Islamic world. Speaker 2: The British, because they were Fighting the Ottomans, and the Ottomans were claiming to be the real representatives of Islam. They wanted a counterforce, And the counterforce was represented by Sharif Hussein being a descendant of the prophet. But Sharif Hussein was speaking of liberating Arab lands, Building a new national state. He wanted to be king of the Arabs, not simply of Arabians. Speaker 0: In July 1915, Sharif Hussein smuggled a message to the British High Commissioner in Cairo, sir Henry McMahon, Offering to raise a substantial Arab force against the Ottomans in return for British support for Arab independence. In the ensuing secret correspondence between the 2 men, Sharif Hussein was given to understand that he could expect British support in achieving some of his ambitions in the event of an Ottoman defeat. This letter of October 26, 1915 Outline the main points of the arrangement. Speaker 6: The actual document itself is absolutely Riven with ambiguity. There's no doubt about that. The question is whether Hussein recognizes that. My sense of Saying is that he does recognize it. In other words, there is no wool being poured over his eyes because he's perfectly aware that if he's going to create A modern Arab empire, he's going to need some logistical economic Development and that can only come from the outside world. Speaker 0: Taking Britain's assurances of support at face value, Hussein, together with his sons Faisal and Abdullah, Amassed a sizable force. The new army was commanded by the young and charismatic Faisal, who had captured the imagination of the Arab masses in the quest for Arab independence. Yet even as Hussein and Fizal mobilized their troops, the British were preparing to sell them short. Back in London in the spring of 1916, Britain was negotiating with France about the future shape of the Middle East. Behind closed doors, sir Mark Sykes of the British foreign office had been meeting his French opposite number, Francois Georges Picot. Britain knew it was vital to offer the French a stake in the spoils of the Ottoman Empire should they win the war. Speaker 7: There was an awareness on the British side that they had made such huge sacrifices that one couldn't just ignore, the French ambitions, and the French were determined to have their historical peace of the Levant. Speaker 0: Pouring over a map of the Levant, Sykes and Pico personally drew in the areas they wished to see under their control. Their secret deal amounted to the virtual carve up of the Middle East. In area A for the French and area B for the British, the imperialists intended to exercise power indirectly. They would appoint advisers and take charge of the finances in their respective spheres of influence. Then there was the area colored blue which was to be directly controlled by France. This included what was then known as Greater Syria where the French traditionally had commercial and religious interests. As for the area colored pink known as Iraq With its strategic ports, railways and oil, this was to be under British rule. The area, colored yellow, represented Palestine and was envisaged as an international zone except for Haifa. Speaker 2: What the British wanted was the oil of Iraq, And they concentrated on getting Iraq and getting away bit from Iraq to the Mediterranean in order to transport this oil. So they got Haifa on the Palestinian coast, and they got most of Iraq. Speaker 7: The Sykes PICA agreement was a pretty shameful document, and I wouldn't attempt to defend it. But it was drawn up by people who were sort of Operating under the old, kind of balance of power considerations in an imperial, frame of mind. Speaker 0: Unaware of these secret dealings behind their backs, Hussein and Faisal proclaimed independence. And in June 1916 attacked the Turkish troops. The Arab revolt against the Ottomans had begun. The Turkish garrison at Mecca was soon overrun and the seaport at Jidda seized. By 1917, Hussein and Faisal's forces had pushed north and engage the Ottoman Turks along the Hejaz railway. The British saw the Arab revolt as part of its strategy for creating a military diversion against the Central Powers. In a pincer movement, Britain had launched a campaign from the southwest to ensure control of the Suez Canal and the Levant. And from the southeast, it was fighting to secure the oil wells of Iraq. All this to attack the Central Powers at their weakest point, the Ottoman Empire. Speaker 2: The Arabs hitched their fortunes to the British. They consider themselves to be fighting with the allies, but at the same time, they were not merged into the British Army that they continue to act as an independent army called the Northern Army. Speaker 0: While the Arab army advanced northwards, Britain's general Allenby had crossed the Suez Canal. And by the spring of 1917, his forces had reached the frontier of Palestine. The war in Europe, however, was still not going well for Britain. The attempted push through the German lines at the Somme had produced little territorial gain. And the cost in lives was colossal. In London, there had been a change of leadership. The new prime minister, Lloyd George, felt that the Allied war effort needed a fresh impetus. Although America had so far been neutral in the Lloyd George was convinced that could be changed. He believed there was 1 powerful group which might influence the American government. Speaker 3: Lloyd George thought that the American decision, whether to join or not, would defend critically on public opinion, and the Jewish support could tilt the scales in one direction or the other. Speaker 5: You've got to remember that the British foreign office greatly overestimate the political power of international Jewry, particularly The wealthy, financial, and commercial, Jewish elites. Speaker 6: What is extraordinary about this situation is that Here you have particularly the British seeing the Jewish world as one collective monolithic entity. And in that sense, they start looking at the role of the Jews in the war as being something which might be important and from the point of view of the allies, something else quite remarkable. This monolithic collective entity is pro German. Speaker 0: Many Jews in the upper echelons of German society did indeed have close connections to the Kaiser's foreign office. A new Jewish nationalist movement, Zionism, had also been able to establish its headquarters in Berlin. Zionism had originated in the 18 eighties after Theodore Herzl published a book espousing the virtues of a Jewish state. This caused a sensation amongst Jewish intellectuals in Germany, Austria, and Russia who shared Herzl's outrage at the escalation of anti Jewish Speaker 3: The end of 19th century saw the rise of anti Semitism all over Europe, in Austria, In Germany, in France, but particularly in Eastern Europe, in Poland, and in Russia. And the pogrom against the Jews in Russia gave rise to the establishment of The lovers of Zion societies in a number of Russian cities who started to promote and to finance and to sponsor colonization, immigration to Palestine. Herzl came to the conclusion that the Jews were not safe anywhere in Europe, And the only solution was for the Jews to have a state of their own over which they could exercise sovereignty and where they would not be A minority. Speaker 0: What had also given Zionism its appeal was the way in which it fitted in to historic Jewish aspirations. Scattered throughout the world since the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in the 1st century AD, many Jews had cherished the idea of returning one day to what their scriptures had told them was the Promised Land. In fact, there had already been a small community of indigenous Jews in Palestine. But even when some European Jews established settlements throughout the late 19th century, the whole Jewish community, by 1914, Constituted barely 8% of the population. The Zionist leader in Britain, Chaim Weizmann, had been lobbying the government For a guarantee that in the event of an Ottoman defeat, it would support Jewish emigration to Palestine. By early 1917, Lloyd George's view of Jews as globally influential convinced him that Zionism was another nationalist movement which should be co opted to the Allied cause. In March, Mark Sykes began negotiations with Weizmann. Speaker 6: But actually the Jews do ultimately look to each other and look to their own interest. And if that interest As they are being told by Weitzman is, what we really want is Palestine. They're prepared to believe it. They're prepared to go along with it. Speaker 0: As negotiations with Weizmann continued over the following months, The war deteriorated rapidly for the Allies. The German submarine campaign was seriously weakening Britain's merchant fleet. And although America had entered the war on the Allied side, President Woodrow Wilson was not yet willing to supply a significant number of troops. Britain's latest attempt to keep up the pressure on the Western Front soon became came bogged down in the muddy trenches of Passchendaele. As thousands of young men's lives were wasted in another a fruitless campaign, morale amongst the soldiers plummeted. But the most serious threat to the Allied war machine came from the east. Russia was on the verge of collapse. After massive defeats at the hands of the Germans, The war weary country was disintegrating with food shortages, strikes, and demonstrations. When the czar was deposed in a revolution, Britain and France became greatly alarmed. Speaker 5: The point is that once Russia and its war effort begins to collapse, essentially, the Germans have won the First World War Unless they bring the Americans in, there's no way that the British and the French on their own are ever going to defeat Germany. Speaker 0: In October, the British government received an intelligence report suggesting that Jews were a significant influence in the leadership of the Bolshevik Party, The new revolutionary movement emerging as the dominant force in Russia. Lloyd George feared that these communists would take Russia out of the war. With the Americans still refusing to Using to commit sufficient forces, he knew it was time to act. He instructed his foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, To issue a pledge to capture the hearts and minds of the Jewish people. Speaker 8: His majesty's government view with favor The establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. And we'll use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievements of this object. Speaker 0: The Balfour Declaration was issued on November 2, 1917 Just as British forces were occupying Palestine. Speaker 3: I would say that the Balfour Declaration has to be understood Not as an idealistic gesture, but it has to be understood within the framework of British Imperial policy. And Lloyd George was the main instigator of That, declaration because he believed that it would serve Britain's interests. Speaker 0: But this was also the first time that any major European power had given official backing for the Zionist goal of making Palestine into a Jewish homeland. Yet sheriff Hussein had understood that Palestine had been promised as part of his deal for Arab independence. Anticipating Arab outrage at the prospect of a Jewish homeland in a largely Arab province, the Balfour Declaration had also stated that Speaker 8: Nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine. Speaker 0: The declaration, nonetheless, appeared to indicate British support for Jewish emigration. Speaker 2: There were only a mere 80,000 Out of some, like, 700,000 people in Palestine who were Jews, the In, indigenous inhabitants of Palestine were referred to as non Jewish inhabitants, And that that Palestine was being identified even at that stage as a Jewish land, and all the others had no defined identity. They were simply non Jewish. Speaker 3: The Balfour Declaration was what it says, a declaration. It wasn't a treaty. It wasn't a signed agreement. It was a declaration in support of the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. Speaker 0: In fact, the only treaty Britain had signed in regard to Palestine was with the French, the secret Sykes Picot Agreement. On November 7th, within a few days of the Balfour Declaration, the Bolsheviks took power in Russia. Lloyd George hoped that it would have a desired effect of appeasing the Jews in the communist leadership. Speaker 6: What is it that they supposedly So want as Jews, Palestine. Now the whole argument is is totally logical. It's a nonsense argument because these particular people if one were to think of people like Trotsky or Zinovie or Yaffe, Some of the key Jewish leaders in the Russian Revolution, the the November Revolution, these these people, of course, are internationalists. Speaker 3: There were 15 to 20 Jews in the higher echelons of the Bolshevik party. Most of them were anti Zionist. And after they came to power, they, soon after they came to power, they issued a declaration to say that Zionism is a capitalist ploy, a capitalist idea. Speaker 0: The wildly inaccurate intelligence report on which Lloyd George based his strategy was to have major implications for Britain. Within weeks, Russia's new leaders did exactly the opposite of what he had expected. Not only did they pull out of the war, They opened up the archives of the czar's foreign office and published the secret treaties. The very treaties Britain had engineered with her allies to carve up Ottoman Empire, and to which Russia had been privy. Speaker 5: That, of course, is a very great embarrassment to the Western Allies because the Allies have been doing all sorts of deals behind the scenes in which They have handed out to each other large sections of the world, meanwhile, openly preaching That they are fighting the war in defense of democracy and, of course, also telling among others, the Arabs, That they are supporters of self determination for the peoples of the Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Publication secret treaties by the Bolsheviks It certainly creates an enormous suspicion in the Arab world, and this meant that the Sharif Hussein and the others said, wait a minute. What's going on? What a, Why are you not giving us independence? And secondly, why are you dividing us up into zone a and zone b? And at that point, of course, the Arabs realized that not only with the the British Their own particular interests, for example, in the ports of Palestine or in Iraq, but that they had promised other things to the French. Speaker 0: Amid Arab confusion and suspicion, general Allenby entered Jerusalem on foot together with Sykes, Pico, and a number of other allied notables. His British led forces had captured the holy city in December 1917. The leaders of the Arab Revolt, however, were nowhere to be seen. Fearing that Hussein and Faisal might lose heart, the British government forwarded a message to them, reiterating British commitment to Arab independence. Speaker 8: The Adam race will be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation of the world. This can only be achieved by the Adams themselves uniting, And Great Britain and her allies will pursue a policy with this ultimate unity in you. Speaker 0: Hussein stayed loyal to the Allied cause, still prepared to accept Britain's word on Arab independence, Although he spoke of settling accounts after the war. From Alander's point of view, he continued to rely on Arab support in the war against the Ottomans. But now that Jerusalem had been occupied by the British, had been occupied by the British. 1 party seized the initiative. In April 1918, Chaim Weizmann and the International Zionist Commission Traveled to Palestine to lay the foundation for a Hebrew university. Their hope was that it would become the intellectual hub of Zionism. Weizmann's visit, however, caused widespread alarm and indignation among the Arab population. And when he and the chief rabbi of Jerusalem met General Allenby, it looked as if Britain was preparing to honor the Balfour Declaration. 6 months later, Allenby's forces entered Damascus With their ally, Faisal's northern army, they had pushed the Ottoman troops north through Palestine into Syria. Speaker 2: The Arab revolt did contribute To the victory of the allies, first of all, it protected British flank in Palestine. Second, it kept a number of Turkish and German troops preoccupied. And third, the the British could have Never legitimized what they were doing unless they had the blessing of a particular Arab force. Speaker 0: On the 3rd October, the people of Damascus Flocked to Faisal's victory parade. If he was to seize power, he knew it was of great importance to make his presence felt And to be seen by the Arab people as their liberator. Later the same day, however, Faisal met with General Allenby at the Victoria Hotel in Damascus. Allenby warned him that his rule in Syria would be limited. Speaker 2: The British, by that time, knew that they were going to hand over Syria to the French. So they couldn't actually accept Faisal as a legitimate ruler. All they could do is to pay him his salary and the expenses of his army and his administration. Speaker 0: Undaunted by Allenby's warnings, Faisal assumed the title of governor of Damascus. With the support of his father, Sharif Hussein, he set about creating a power base for their goal of an independent Arab state. Pendant Arab state. On 31st October, the Ottomans were finally defeated. And at 11 o'clock on the 11th November 1918, The guns fell silent in Europe as the war with the Central Powers came to an end. The Peace Conference at Versailles began in January 1919. Representatives of the victorious allies, such as the French prime minister, Thomasin, and the American president, Woodrow Wilson, gathered to sort out what was to be done with the former territories of the defeated empires. Now the liberal use of promises by the British government had to be prioritized. Speaker 4: They did indeed make pledges to the Arabs, but they also made pledges to the Jews. They also made pledges to the French and the Russians and everybody else. And these people saw the world As an imperial world, not only did they want to carve out the Middle East, they wanted to carve up Russia. They thought this was the last great moment in which the imperial would be able to sit down and grab what was going, particularly since there was no one to stop them. Speaker 0: But Britain and her old ally, France, were up against the American president Woodrow Wilson's vision of a new world order, which promoted national self determination. Speaker 2: Once Independence had seemed to be a possibility that this principle of self determination, supported by the Americans, was going to be offered to all those who were to be liberated from former empires like the Habsburgs and the Ottomans. What the Palestinians wanted was an independent state. Speaker 0: In fact, Faisal had come from Damascus to plead the Arab cause. But the future of Palestine and the Middle East formed part of Britain's pledge to France in the Sykes Picoca Carver. In the event, Woodrow Wilson's principles about self determination were forgotten when it came to the people of the Middle East. Britain and France were free to go ahead with their agreement. But what of the promises Britain had made to the Jews regarding Palestine. Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour, in a confidential memo during the Versailles Tsai peace talks with America, France, and Italy wrote. Speaker 8: The 4 great powers are committed to Zionism, and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad is rooted in age long traditions. In present needs, in future hopes, a far profounder import than the desires and and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. Speaker 0: That might sound like a warm endorsement of Zionism. Yet further in the post war memorandum, Balfour hints at a much more cynical agenda. Speaker 8: So far as Palestine is concerned, the powers have made no declaration of policy which at least in letter, they have not always intended to violate. Speaker 0: The Versailles peace conference was concluded on June 28, 1919 with the creation of the League of Nations. The 1st global institution for peace and security. Its covenant provided that the Arab and other territories ceded by the defeated Ottoman Empire should be administered by mandates which meant in effect that Britain and France were given the authority to impose their rule over the Arab territories. On November 21, 1919, Francois Georges Picot, the co architect of the Sykes Picot agreement, And the French general Goro arrived in Beirut. And so began the imposition of the French mandate for Syria and The British forces who had occupied the region since ousting the Ottoman Turks during the last months of the war were handing over power to The French, thus fulfilling their wartime pledge. Consolidating his position. When he was proclaimed king by the Syrian National Congress, the French were incensed and general Guro sent in his troops. By August 7, 1920, Faisal had been deposed and had to Faisal of a single independent state were now a distant memory for the Europeans. Speaker 1: The whole issue of spheres of influence meant that What appeared what was at first appeared to be a willingness to accept a single Arab state was in fact seriously diluted. And then on top of that, of course, the very fact of there being at French area and a British area meant that in effect, this was the seed of partition. So you had both Independence was denied, but also the unity of this area was denied. Speaker 0: The boundaries and governments of the Middle Eastern states that emerged bore the unmistakable the French half of the previously Ottoman province of Greater Syria became the mandate for Lebanon and Syria. The other half became the British mandate for Transjordan and Palestine. In the east, the Ottoman area of Mesopotamia, which included the oil fields of Mersour, was given to Britain as the mandate for Iraq. Speaker 2: So this was basically The importance of the Sykes Picot agreement to divide what is called the fertile crescent between Iraq and Syria And let Britain get access to the oil of the area and be able to exploit it in the Speaker 0: But British rule was initially rejected by the Iraqi people until Faisal was installed as king in July 1921. Britain hoped the limited power it devolved to him would serve to placate the frustrated demands for Arab independence. But sheriff Hussein expected more from the British. More from the British. Speaker 2: He never gave up the idea that the British had promised him independence, not only in Arabia, but in Syria and Iraq as well. And he wanted the British to fulfill their Promises. Speaker 0: Sheriff Hussein's dream of an Arab kingdom ruled by the Hashemites was only partially fulfilled. For although his other son, Abdullah, became King of Transjordan, their old rival, Ibn Saud, swept the Hashemites out of Hejaz when he conquered the whole of the Arabian Peninsula. In Jerusalem, An administration was established by the British in the spring of 1920. There were no plans for devolving power in Palestine. Palestine was a land sacred to 3 religions. Jews were a small minority who had lived harmoniously with Christians and the much larger community of Muslims for 100 of years. But the Balfour declaration, promising Jews a homeland in had been incorporated into the British mandate at Versailles. Palestine was thus to be opened for new European Jewish immigration. With celebrations and parades in support of Zionist activities. It seemed as if the British were going to honor their pledges to the Jews and ignore Palestinian hopes of independence. Speaker 3: The Arabs Had a strong case, but very poor advocates. The Zionists had a case. It wasn't as strong as that of the local Arabs but they had brilliant advocates. Zionism is one of the greatest public relations success stories of the 20th century, and Chaim Weizmann Exemplified these traditional Jewish skills of advocacy and, persuasion. Speaker 0: Some of these skills were clearly in evidence when Weizmann and various Zionist groups helped finance land purchases and the building of settlements for immigrant Jews. At the same time, Political and security organizations were created to support the emerging Jewish homeland. The Arab community in Palestine was incensed. Speaker 2: The Palestinians couldn't conceive their country being divided or given away to Another community, which had nothing to do with the Middle East in the 1st place and was almost wholly European at the time. So to them, it seemed absurd that 600 to 700,000 should give up their land, their homes, their villages, their towns, and hand them over to a minority, which was dispersed, throughout Palestine. And Palestine, after all, is named after its people, who are the Palestinians. Speaker 0: In 1925, Arthur Balfour toured the new Jewish settlements in Palestine. Although he was fated as a hero of the Zionist cause, the immigration of European Jews was to have unforeseen consequences for British rule in Palestine. Speaker 3: I believe that the Balfour Declaration was one of the most serious mistakes in British imperial history. It, committed Britain to, support of Jewish nationalism in Palestine after the war, and, it did not, produced any immediate benefits for Britain. Speaker 6: Without the Balfour Declaration, There could have been no genuine development of a Jewish national home, and the follow through In 1948 where you get the creation of a state of Israel simply would not have happened. It it requires the umbrella of the British to be there, in effect, to support the emerging Jewish national home militarily At the bottom line, the very fact that there are British troops, British policemen there to protect the Jewish communities is ultimately central to the situation. It could not have been done in any other way. Speaker 0: Throughout the 1930s and forties, the years of Nazi persecution in the Holocaust. Jewish immigration to Palestine increased rapidly. But what was seen by the Arabs As an alien incursion and the Jews as a fulfillment of historic rights led to polarization and violence. In response to terrorist acts by Arabs, Britain restricted the immigration. But the policy only stimulated Jewish terrorism. Against this background, Britain relinquished its mandate. And the state of Israel was born in 1948. When the first of several wars between the new state and its Arab neighbors began, thousands of Palestinian Arabs fled their homeland. Thus, the strategies employed by Britain to win the First World War Inadversely left a deep divide between Arab and Jew. Speaker 3: The most serious consequences of British policy during the war was the encouragement of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism. And in the aftermath Of the First World War, Britain was left with this legacy of double dealing And of betrayal, which was to haunt her for a long, long time. Speaker 1: Clearly, it played a role in dividing the Arab world into different states, in allowing the establishment of the State of Israel, and in frustrating Arab desires. But if what happened in in Sykes Picot and everything else that happened in the First World War is used as an excuse For the problems of the Middle East now, I think that would be a mistake. But, yes, the roots of what we see today certainly arose from the double dealing of the First war and from the frustrated expectations of that time.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Spider’s Web — The Secret World of Finance

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"The Spider's Web: Britain's Second Empire | The Secret World of Finance" 🚨 A MUST WATCH 🚨 The City of London financial interests created a web of secrecy jurisdictions that captured wealth from across the globe and hid it in a web of offshore islands. Today, up to half of global offshore wealth is hidden in British jurisdictions and Britain and its dependencies are the largest global players in The Secret World of Finance.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses how Britain transformed from a colonial power to a modern financial power and how this transformation has shaped the world we live in. It highlights the role of the City of London as the world's biggest global financial center during the days of the British Empire. As the empire declined, the city declined as well. However, British elites found a new role in finance and established offshore havens in British overseas territories. These secrecy jurisdictions allowed for the growth of the offshore system, attracting international banks and facilitating tax evasion and financial fraud. The video also exposes the close ties between the British establishment, politicians, and the financial industry, which has led to a lack of regulation and accountability. The offshore system has contributed to global inequality and hindered development in many countries. The video calls for transparency and the end of offshore secrecy. (150 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The British soldier. All around the globe, you'll find him From Gibraltar to Hong Kong. Everywhere he stands against the threatening years, Staunch symbol of our common will to order. Speaker 1: The British Empire, the largest empire the world has ever known. For over 300 years, Britain ruled, Its army is conquered, and its bankers proclaimed the might of its currency. But one day it all began to fall apart. 1 by 1, Countries declared their independence from Britain, and no amount of force could reverse the tide. As British elites saw their wealth, privileges and empire disintegrate, they began to search for a new role in a changing world, and they found one in finance. This is a film about how Britain transformed from a colonial power To a modern financial power and how this transformation has shaped the world we live in. In the days of the British Empire, The City of London was the world's biggest global financial center. Speaker 2: The City of London was the kind of beating financial heart of the British Empire. The historians Cain and Hopkins call it the governor of the imperial engine. All these countries in the empire, used to use the sterling currency, and the City of London was kind of the financier of this. So not just inside the sterling zone, but outside the sterling zone as well. Speaker 1: As Britain's empire declined. So too did the city of London. Speaker 3: 1 British army truck is bombed, killing 2 soldiers and wounding 12. As rioting comes daily more widespread on Cyprus. Young people of high school age take an increasing part in the violence. Here, a group of girls are being dispersed after a rock throwing battle with British military police. Speaker 1: With the decline of empire, British commercial interests across the globe were under threat. In 1956, Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal. Speaker 3: A new Middle East Crisis arises as president Nasser of Egypt tells a wildly cheering crowd in Alexandria that Egypt has seized the internationally owned Suez US Canal. Speaker 2: France and Britain issue Speaker 3: a 12 hour ultimatum. Within hours of its Britain's warplanes are winging their way to Egypt, and its bombers attack 5 key cities, including Cairo. Speaker 1: The United States was opposed to the invasion and put pressure on Britain and France to withdraw their troops. Speaker 4: There will be no United States involvement in these present hostilities. It is our hope and intent this matter will be brought before the United Nations general assembly. There, the opinion of the world can be brought to bear in our quest for a just end to this tormenting problem. Speaker 1: Britain was humiliated. The Suez Crisis signified the end of Britain's role as one of the world's major powers. Speaker 5: Following the crisis, there was a run on the sterling on the UK pound. Some people suspect that the American government was encouraging this run on the UK pound. Speaker 1: As financiers withdrew their money from Britain, The value of the pound decreased. To protect the value of the pound, Britain limited the bank's overseas lending. Speaker 5: They were not able to invest abroad. And obviously, they were unhappy. And we don't know exactly the context, but it's very clear that the banks or their representative made a representation to the Bank of England, which in itself was dominated by representative from the banking industry. It seems that they have reached an agreement which was never written. That if the banks, intermediated between 2 non residents in a foreign currency, in that case, dollar that this particular intermediation, this particular deal will not be considered by the Bank of England under its own jurisdiction. Speaker 1: The banks began to create a market for dollars in London called the London Eurodollar Market. To So I'm just wondering if you could just give us a quick overview of the business. The Bank of England, the UK regulator, declared that the London Euromarket accounts were not in London. They were elsewhere, and therefore, it had no responsibility for regulating them. Speaker 6: It's about providing a legal space in which you pretend activity is taking place. And the importance of that is that you pretend it's not taking place in the economy where it really is taking place. So you're taking activity from Place where it's regulated and taxed and pretending that it's happening elsewhere. Now where doesn't really matter. It's just elsewhere. Speaker 1: When American banks realized that London offered the ability to avoid US regulations, They moved their international operations to the city. Around the same time as American banks were moving their international operations to London, another new kind of financial space began to emerge, Far away from London, in Britain's overseas jurisdictions, the last remnants of empire. Speaker 2: Back in the sixties, the Cayman Islands was a complete backwater. The stories go that mosquitoes were so thick In the air, sometimes they're enough to suffocate cows. That's a legend that you hear about the Cayman Islands. I don't know how true it was. But it was there was nothing happening there. Speaker 1: Accountants and lawyers from London arrived in the Cayman Islands and other British dependencies and began to draft a set of financial secrecy laws and regulations. Because these jurisdictions' main selling point was secrecy, they were called secrecy jurisdictions. Speaker 2: What the Cayman Islands was doing was straightforwardly illegal activity. Drugs money was coming in in huge quantities, Tax evasion, whatever whatever you wanted, you could have it. Speaker 1: The Bank of England was observing the developments from London And noted in a report marked secret dated 11th April 1969. We need to be quite sure That the possible proliferation of trust companies, banks, etcetera, which in most cases would be no more than brass plates manipulating assets outside the islands, does not get out of hand. There is, of course, no objection to their providing bolt holes for nonresidents. But we need to be sure that in so doing, opportunities are not created for the transfer of UK capital to the non sterling area outside UK rules. Speaker 2: These small territories, the last remnants of the British Empire, which are still overseas territories today, they are still the last remnants of the British Empire. There are 14 of these overseas territories. 7 of them are bona fide tax havens, including the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, The British Virgin Islands, some of the biggest tax havens in the world today, are still British. Speaker 1: With access to large amounts of offshore money, The euro market grew rapidly. By 1980, it had reached $500,000,000,000. By 1988, $4,800,000,000,000. And by 1997, nearly 90% of all international loans were made through this market. The British Empire had sunk, leaving hardly a trace behind. But the city of London Adapted and survived. The City of London, London's financial district, is a peculiar place. It has been called a city within a city, A state within a state. It is run by an organization called the City of London Corporation. A private company that performs all the functions of a local council with a private police force and private courts. Speaker 7: Those of you who aren't from the UK, some of you even who are, might not be aware just how weird a thing the little city of London is within the big the big London. The city of London is, an a separate entity to, the wider London, And it has its own, head, the lord mayor, who's distinct from the mayor, who runs the rest of London. Speaker 1: Every November, the city stages the Lord Mayor's show, the world's oldest civic procession. Speaker 7: The city of London has long had this curious legal status because, back in 10/66, when William the Conqueror came over, The city was one of the only portions of England that he failed to conquer, and he struck a deal with the city in 10/67 that allowed them to continue functioning. Speaker 1: To this day, the city of London is exempt from numerous laws that govern the rest of Britain. Its political derives from the Middle Ages. The city's electorate is dominated not by its residents, but by the private businesses Operating within the city. Its lord mayor is selected by the heads of medieval guilds. Speaker 8: They have a a representative in the House of Commons called the Remembrancer. Apart from the clerks of the of the House of Commons. He's the only unelected person there. Speaker 7: All other lobbyists have to stop, you know, in the lobby. They're not allowed past the lobby. Speaker 1: The City of London has a permanent Representative in the House of Commons whose role is to report back to the City of London Corporation and to lobby parliament On behalf of the city. Speaker 5: The corporation of London, clearly, it's a uniquely unique and Interesting phenomena that should have attracted, many political scientists, political economists, and economists. But I don't know of anyone who has studied systematically the corporation in London and its impact on policy or economic policy. So we can only surmise. Some people, assume or surmise that the corporation in London is extremely powerful and is able, in one way or another, to shape, British policy, particularly within financial methods. Speaker 8: Clement Attlee, the prime minister after the Second World War, had had something to say about the state of London Corporation. Speaker 7: He did. Thank you. So over and over again, we have seen that there is, in this country, another power than that which has its seat at Westminster. The city of London, a convenient term for a collection of financial interests, is able to assert itself against the government of the country. Those who control money can pursue a policy at home and abroad contrary to that which has been decided by the people. Speaker 1: At the heart of the city of London stands the Bank of England. The Bank of England is not just a central bank. It is also a financial regulator. At the demise of empire, the Bank of England used this regulatory authority to help attract the world's banks to London. In 1972, the Bank of England issued a license to the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, which set up its head office in London. Within 10 years, BCCI grew into the 7th largest bank in the world. 10 years later, BCCI was bankrupt. Speaker 9: The Deputy director of the CIA Richard Kerr said late today that the CIA did use BCCI To support CIA activities overseas. Speaker 1: But BCCI had not just collaborated with the world's intelligence services. It had also engaged in extensive financial fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing. Speaker 10: BCCI constituted international global crime of a level that boggles the mind. Speaker 11: Financing terrorism. The Bank of England knew it, says the report. But instead of supervising it properly, it tried to prevent the bank's collapse. Speaker 10: I I'm saying very directly that the Bank of England had sufficient information in front of it to close BCCI 15 months earlier than it did, millions of depositors were hurt in that process. Speaker 1: Numerous whistle blowers from BCCI had contacted the Bank of England. Yet the Bank of Speaker 2: England did Speaker 12: nothing. The Bank of England had plenty of time to intervene and investigate, But it did not do so because the tradition at that time, which still survives, is that a well, actually, you know, you have to just Kinda send hints and talk over lunch tables with the chaps, regulating other chaps, and all would be well. Speaker 1: Robin Lee Pemberton, the governor of the Bank of England at the time of the collapse of BCCI commented, the present system of supervision has served the community well. If we closed down a bank every time we found an incidence of fraud, you would have rather fewer banks than we do at the moment. London was a place for banks to engage in business that was not allowed Where senior bankers did not have to worry about the consequences of their actions. This is one of the reasons why today there are more banks in London than in any other financial center. Speaker 2: In Britain, nobody goes to jail. No bankers go to jail. They generally don't. They are a protected species, and that is part of the offshore business model of the UK is to say, we will protect you. We will bring your money here, and we will look after you. We're not gonna put you in prison. We'll let you do what you want. Speaker 1: Light touch regulation was one way of attracting business to London. Another was secrecy. From the 19 sixties onwards, City of London institutions began to establish offshore branches in former outpost of the British Empire. Their aim was to create offshore centers with strong secrecy legislation in order to attract capital from across the globe. Speaker 2: Swiss banking secrecy is the most famous, the most well known. You put your money in a Swiss bank and they won't they promise not to tell anybody. And that's one kind of secrecy. But Another kind of secrecy, which is very British, is the trust. And the trust is a very, slippery, complicated, And devious mechanism. Trusts emerge, the legend has it from the time of the Crusades when the knights would go off and fight in foreign lands And they would leave their assets in the care of trusted stewards. What trusts do ultimately is they play with the concept of ownership. Ownership is not such a simple thing. So the settler, the knight in this case, would hand over the assets to Someone who these days would be called a trustee, it's often a lawyer. Legally, you are separated from those assets. They're not yours anymore. There's a barrier. You can't be taxed on them. You can't be nobody's gonna find anything about your connection to these assets. Speaker 1: In Britain's offshore jurisdictions, No qualifications are necessary to be a trustee. Anyone can set up a trust and act as a trustee. There is no registry of trusts. There are no bodies to certify that a trust has been set up. Speaker 13: The only persons who know about the creation of this agreement are The trustee and the settlor. There's no obligation to register it. There is no financial reporting obligation of trusts. They're not required to put annual statements onto account anywhere. So, actually, trusts are, To all intents and purposes, invisible arrangements. Speaker 1: Economist John Christiansen was an economic adviser to the secrecy jurisdiction of Jersey For 10 years. Speaker 13: We're not talking about a few million. We're talking now about 1,000,000,000. 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of copper, which apparently belong to nobody. For tax purposes and for other purposes, they belong to nobody. Everything, works of arts, gold bullion, horse racehorses, cars, real estate, Not just financial assets, but a whole load of nonfinancial assets belong to these trusts, sitting there, belonging to nobody. Now think that one through, because we are talking about maybe as much as $50,000,000,000,000 of assets sitting offshore behind these instruments. Speaker 14: Well, the Cayman Islands are among several British overseas territories who have signed a new information exchange agreement with Britain and the rest of Europe to tackle tax evasion. The countries are now required to automatically provide details of the ownership of bank accounts and how they're used. Cayman became the 1st signatory last week. Speaker 15: It's important that the Cayman Islands should be recognized as the 1st overseas territory to sign such an agreement with the United Kingdom. And I think this importantly reflects The constructive approach that the Cayman Islands has taken in delivering our shared objective of rooting out Tax evasion. Speaker 13: The trust lies at the core of the British secrecy model. They don't use banking secrecy. The Swiss use banking That's why the Brits are doing this. Speaker 1: Trusts are the basic building block of Anglo Saxon secrecy, and they form the basis from which complex offshore structures are created. Every secrecy jurisdiction offers a specific set of services. From trusts to shell companies to secret bank accounts and directors. The combination of these services into complex structures spanning multiple jurisdictions Speaker 2: will often have a trust kind of sitting at the top of it. The trust will be here managing the assets, kind of controlling the assets. Underneath it, the trust own some shell companies. Each one might be in a different jurisdiction. So you might have a trust in 1 jurisdiction whose trustees are somewhere else, Whose beneficiaries are somewhere else, which owns offshore companies somewhere else. Each of these companies might then own assets so that They might own, you know, a bank account, a a racehorse, a yacht, a painting, a portfolio of shares, or whatever. Speaker 1: There are numerous variations of trusts and offshore secrecy structures. There are offshore whose work entails the creation of ever more complex and obscure structures. The aim of these structures is to hide the identity of the owners of offshore assets and allow offshore wealth to be recycled back into global markets. Speaker 16: We're looking on the amount of money, being administrated from tax havens. You see that it is a curve going like this, all the talking we have been doing along with other wonderful people fighting against tech savants has not changed anything. You know? It is the world where you say, go on talking and go on talking. You're interesting me, and I'm going on doing what I want to do. We know everything today because we have had the Panama Papers. We have seen it, and we are not able to upon it. And we are not able to act upon it because this system is really protecting the few people that are having benefit from it. And these are, in percentage very few people, but they are powerful. And I see in the Panama committee that I'm sitting in, The only thing that could change this is to have a public accessible register of the beneficial ownership of trusts and of all kind of companies. It is easy. Speaker 1: The Panama Papers are a collection of leaks from the offshore law firm, Mossack Fonseca. Mossack Fonseca is the 4th largest offshore law firm. The other 9 of the 10 largest offshore law firms are registered in British overseas jurisdictions. When countries complain to Britain about the activities run out of its offshore havens, Britain claims that these places are independent and that there is nothing it can do. Speaker 13: I've heard time and time again from officials in Berlin and in Paris and in Washington and in other countries that they've been told by the British government that, yes, they're well aware of what's going on in Jersey, and they think it's very unfortunate, but they don't have the powers to intervene. Well, that's a straightforward lie. They do have the powers to intervene. They just choose not to. Speaker 2: Britain plays this kind of game of pretending when it suits them to pretend that these places are independent. At the end of the day, Britain, appoints the governor, appoints lots of senior people in these places. They're responsible for foreign relations and defense, and also they can veto their legislation as well. So Britain has a massive degree of control. Basically, it is controlling these places, allowing them a but a political space. Speaker 1: During his time as economic adviser to Jersey, John Christensen frequently Travel to London for talks with various British government departments. Speaker 13: As economic adviser, I had a lot of contact with different departments. Traditionally, UK governments have tried not to interfere in the domestic affairs or places like Jersey. So it happens in a more subtle sort of way. You can go and talk to someone either at the Home Office or the Treasury, And they'd say, we're not actually particularly keen on this piece of legislation. It might be a good idea if you didn't go down that route. And over a cup of tea, that's quite a strong signal. That's a signal, go back to the island and say, they don't want you to do this. Speaker 1: The British government prefers not to interfere overtly. Instead, it communicates its desires through informal discussions. There is no paper trail or official statement. Discussions take place behind closed doors. Speaker 2: The relationship So these places have with London is is very much, about the British establishment and people understanding each other. I mean, Anybody who knows who is British or knows British British people knows that communication between us is often very subtle, and You have to kind of know the codes when people say stuff. I mean, a lot of irony involved and, a lot of, Kind of codified language for British establishment that, people kind of understand how it works. And I think that is very much the case with the British relationship with the tax havens. I think there's a lot of Speaker 1: By keeping its power hidden, Britain is able to claim that these jurisdictions are politically autonomous. Speaker 17: Independence for KMAD is not on government's agenda. That's the message being sent to the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. Attorney Steve Macfield will be representing government at the UN meeting. The committee was set up to help colonies around the world on the road to independence. But mister MacVeal says he'll be making it clear that Cay man is not ready for that transition. Speaker 18: And that message is done. The premier, his cabinet, his party has No mandate from the people of the Cayman Islands to seek independence. That is the message that I will be carrying. Speaker 1: When the Bahamas declared independence from Britain in 1967, the offshore bankers relocated to the Cayman Islands, And continued their business from there. It was the British connection that reassured bankers and their clients that their money was safe. Speaker 2: This British bedrock, that is what has allowed these places to become so trusted by the financial services industry and and offshore and all these people. Speaker 1: In reality, much of the wealth administered in Britain's offshore havens is controlled from London. Speaker 13: The city of London, by and large, likes to do its really dirty work outside London. They might, heaven forbid, Be a a regulator who actually takes the job seriously and starts to prosecute them for fraud in London. So better to do the frauds offshore in Gibraltar or Jersey, where there's much less risk that a serious prosecution will ever happen. Speaker 1: Deals are often discussed and concluded in London, but then registered offshore for tax transparency and regulatory purposes. Speaker 2: What they allow the city to do is to get involved in dirty business. But then when the scandal hits To say, well, they're kind of independent, there's nothing we can do about those places, that's that's not us, that's that's tax haven activity, and we're We're the city, you know, we're we're not involved in that kind of stuff. So it's an incredibly kind of convenient relationship. Speaker 13: The city of London has shaped the the way in which Jersey, Guernsey, and the British overseas territories have developed as tax Havens. I I see these places of the Frankensteins created by by the city of London. Speaker 1: Today, the UK is the world's largest provider of international financial services. Speaker 6: The UK has an almost unique role in global finance. And if you look at data, the kind of Data that we've constructed in the financial secrecy index, you can see the relative shares of each country in The global provision of financial services exports, that's financial services to non residents. Now there are 2 big centers, And everything else is quite small in comparison. Speaker 1: The 2 large centers are the United States, with around 19% of the global market, and the United Kingdom and its offshore jurisdictions, which have around 25% of the global market. Speaker 5: And if you add to that, other jurisdictions, ex colonies. But recently, dependent fairly recently. By which I mean Hong Kong, Singapore, maybe even Dubai and Bahrain, and Cyprus, then you reach a figure of nearly 40%. And I think that figure represents better the position of London in the global financial market. Speaker 2: The soldiers left, the administrators left all the colonies, but they still kept a significant degree of control over the flows from these former, the former parts of empire and the rest of the world. So you could describe it as a second empire. Britain's 2nd empire, sort of hidden financial empire, spanning large parts of the globe. Speaker 1: At the time of the British Empire, the city of London was the world's largest global financial center. Not only Britain's colonies but also independent countries did their banking in London and used the empire's currency for trade and financing. As the Empire declined, so too did the City of London. The UK. So the UK is a very good example of the UK. So the UK is and the creation of secrecy jurisdictions gave banks access to large amounts of cheap money. International banks from across the globe set up branches in London and Britain's offshore jurisdictions in order to take advantage of this new system. Speaker 16: This system has taken the place of the occupation, I mean, up till 62, for France. I don't know for England, but at the same time, England were physically present in India, for instance, or in in, other colonies. And when you look at the money flows through the tax havens, They are increasing when we withdraw from the colonies. We are still plundering developing countries as former colonial powers. Speaker 1: Wealthy individuals, organized crime, and corporations shifted their wealth offshore in exchange for secrecy and no tax. And as countries around the world began to deregulate and open their economies, It became ever easier to do so. Today, as much as half of all global offshore wealth whose flight capital flows mostly into the modern British spider's web. Speaker 13: I think it's no coincidence that Britain's offshore empire emerged more or less at the same time as the collapse of the formal empire. We tend to think of Africa as being a huge net debtor to the rest of the world, but That was the extent of their debts at the end of 2008, a 177,000,000,000. Speaker 1: The debt of Sub Saharan African nations stood at a $177,000,000,000 in 2008. Yet the wealth these countries elites had moved offshore and Speaker 13: $944,000,000,000. Do the maths. Far from being a net debtor, Africa, Sub Saharan Africa is a net creditor to the rest of the world. Speaker 1: As capital moved offshore, African nations borrowed money from international banks at high interest. Over time, these debts became so great that they may never be repaid. Secrecy jurisdictions were starving developing nations of their wealth and their tax revenues. Speaker 19: For a long time, a lot of developing countries, including recently Ecuador, have been trying to set up a UN tax body, which is of a higher value than what is currently there, which is the UN tax committee. And every time this has happened, it has gotten blocked. During the Financing for development process in Addis Ababa last year. I think it was the UK and the US that blocked attempts Again, to set up this, World Tax Organization. So why would they not want to have democratic Decision making in global decisions on how tax gets collected across borders. I don't understand this. As long as we have cross border activity that involves both criminal and legal activity. As long as we're unable to separate the 2, this is going to continue to be a problem. Speaker 1: Western nations block attempts to provide greater transparency of international financial flows and the implementation of global standards for the collection of tax across borders whilst elites in developing nations Speaker 16: And this is true for the copper in Zambia, for the for the gold in Mozambique or in Mali. They have benefited the company that extracted and their shareholders. It has benefit the corrupt elite in the country. Speaker 2: In developing countries, the offshore system of tax havens has facilitated the looting of these countries by their elites. It has enabled them to steal the money and keep it safe somewhere else. Speaker 6: Illicit financial because the anonymity that drives them creates incentives for people in positions of power to be corrupt. This is why there's a group of countries where development progress is so difficult. It's that the incentives of individuals and the ability to pursue them through all the mechanisms that underpin in the shit flows outweigh the type of mechanisms that in that lead you to a powerful representative effective state that can start to deliver development. Speaker 1: Worldwide, and flows into large Western nations like the United States and Britain and enables their currencies to stay strong whilst developing nations currencies remain weak. But illicit flows into Western nations also had another unexpected side effect. The economies of the United States and Britain began to financialize. The origins of this financialization or deindustrialization go back to the 19 sixties. Speaker 3: Anti war demonstrators protest US involvement in the Vietnam War in mass marches, rallies, and demonstrations. President Johnson, meanwhile, let it be known that the FBI is closely watching all antiwar activity. Speaker 1: In the 19 sixties, US economist Michael Hudson was working at Chase Manhattan Bank on Wall Street as Chase's balance of payments economist. Speaker 20: During the 19 sixties, the United states, balance of payments deficit was entirely a result of foreign military expenditures. Speaker 1: Dollars were flowing out of the United states as a result of the cost of the Vietnam War. The United States attempted to prevent the dollars flowing to Vietnam from being deposited in foreign banks. Speaker 20: The government asked Chase to set up a branch in Saigon during the Vietnam War. And as you can imagine, it didn't have, windows. It was sort of a fortress. It lost money, but, the government, went to chase because it said if you don't get This, money that's being thrown off by, the military in, Vietnam, then it's gonna go into French banks. It'll get to general de Gaulle, and you know what is gonna do every month. He's gonna cash it in for gold. That's what the United States is trying to stop. Speaker 1: The US was not successful in stopping the outflow of money, so it began to hatch a different plan. In 1967, Michael Hudson was handed a memo by a former state department employee. Speaker 20: In 1967, I was given by a former state department employee, in the elevator at Chase Manhattan, a memo from the state department urging that Chase Manhattan Would, take the lead in helping the United States become the Switzerland of the world, meaning the flight capital. The state department, through Chase asked me to estimate how much money do you think is available if America were to become the new Switzerland? And how do we do it? The plan was to organize offshore banking centers, in the Caribbean and elsewhere. And the hot money wouldn't come directly in the chase because that wouldn't be, nice and, very illegal. What happened was that, the Latin American criminals, other criminals, drug dealers, all sorts of organized crime would put their money in the offshore Caribbean banks, and these offshore banks would then, deposit the inflow In the head office. Speaker 1: By moving offshore dollars back into the United States, the US was able to stop the outflow of dollars and support the value of its currency. Speaker 20: Every country looks to its foreign exchange rate. And, the foreign exchange rate is not only imports and exports, it's capital movements. And if you look at the International monetary funds, monthly international financial statistics. You have sort of a steady balance of trade, a steady immigrants remittances. What goes up and down are called errors and omissions. What the United Nations and, the IMF call errors and omissions our flight capital. It's the, the reason that it's omitted is, they don't like to really look at this. In the 19 thirties, Roy Ovid economist for the US commerce department wanted to include, criminal movements in the balance of payment statistics, and, congress got Very upset. I I I was told in Washington, the cut the, argument was we're a Christian country. We don't wanna crime. It's just don't look at it, and, they they forbid him to, include, criminal money in the balance of payments. I guess now You call it errors and omissions. You don't call it, criminal inflow and outflow. Speaker 1: In the 19 sixties seventies, Britain was faced with a similar dilemma as the United States. Money was flowing out, and this decreased The value of the pound. Britain realized that it too could support the value of its currency by opening its domestic markets to the 1,000,000,000 1,000,000 of dollars passing through its offshore havens. But just as in the United States, this had an Unexpected side effect. Speaker 20: The British banks, today, just as in the 19th century, don't put their money into, British manufacturing. They put their money into real estate speculation, into financial speculation, foreign currency trade. So, the financialization of London has, helped deindustrialize the country because it's enabled, Sterling to be supported by this huge inflow of Hot money. This inflow of, drug dealing money and criminal money and, tax evasion money all over the world, that is going to London instead of going to Switzerland, Liechtenstein, or the Caribbean. Speaker 1: With the silent backing of the United States, Britain's offshore havens grew rapidly. And before long, the offshore system developed into the world's dominant international financial market. Few were aware how this market functioned. In 1986, economist John Christensen went offshore to investigate. He applied for a position at the Jersey office one of the world's major accounting firms. Speaker 13: But Deloitte and Touche, I was, I was working in what's called company and trust administration, straightforward offshore stuff. I went offshore specifically to work in that area because that's where you're dealing with the offshore companies, the shell companies, the offshore trusts, and you're administering them. That way, I could I could see from working inside, a big global accounting firm, exactly what the clients were doing. I had complete access to all the client files. And over the course of my period of working with Deloitte Touche, I investigated over a 100 of their clients offshore, and this is what I found. There were some insider traders, some market rigging, some avoiding disclosure of conflict of interest, illicit arms trading, illicit political campaign donations, contract kickbacks, bribery, fraudulent invoicing, trade mispricing, and, at the bottom, tax evasion. Okay? This is what the clients were doing. The basis of a sample of the clients that I looked at, Not a single client was involved in what I would regard as genuinely legitimate activity. They were all involved in some kind of tax dodging or, worse. Speaker 16: I met with Karl Levin. He used to be an American Senator, And he made a lot of inquiries into private banking, asking question to the bankers. What do you think the percentage is among your clients that are using these companies for legitimate purposes, and the answer was, I believe that 99.9% of my Clients are using these companies for illicit purposes. This is a reality. This is American bankers telling what they are doing. And it's exactly the same thing with, UK bankers helping their clients to have accounts in Panama or in Bermuda or in Cayman Islands. Speaker 1: Secrecy jurisdictions are heavily used for fraudulent and gray area financial activities, areas where secrecy is not just desirable, but a necessity. Legitimate financial activity Has no need for the secrecy offshore havens provide, nor a desire to pay the high fees offshore banks and law firms charge. In public, these jurisdictions claim they are transparent and their financial services sectors are engaged in legitimate financial activities. Speaker 21: Our economy is not based on secrecy. It's, it's based on transparency. It's based on a sound regulatory environment. It's based on good governance and good government, with the British government, legal system. That's what our, financial institutions are based on. Speaker 17: Well, tonight we have a response from the head of Cayman Finance after a group of US based anti tax evasion activists Announce plans to travel to Cayman to draw attention to what they feel is corporate tax evasion. Finance Chairman Mr. Richard Cole says he's encouraging the group to visit And says our financial sector has nothing to hide. Speaker 22: I would say if anybody wants to come to Cayman to find out what what's coming, you know, what what we do here, Come on down. We have no secrets here. Speaker 2: When I went to the Cayman Islands, back in 2008, I think it was. I called the government spokesman. He said, okay, we have had an order from on high that nobody is allowed to speak to you. You are off limits. Speaker 1: In 2011, journalist Nicholas Schaxson released Treasure Islands, a groundbreaking book about the offshore system. Speaker 14: The author of a series of international media reports says he would welcome a debate with Cayman finance chair Tony Travers. Mr. Travers recently called Nicholas Jackson, an imbecile with the understanding of an of an 11 year old. There are always going Speaker 23: to be the politics of envy. Now the politics of envy are exacerbated by, imbeciles who don't actually understand what's going on in the Cayman Islands. I Speaker 1: The Cayman Islands is the 5th largest financial center in the world. It hosts 80,000 registered companies, over 3 quarters of the world's hedge funds and $1,900,000,000,000 in deposits. It has a population of 60,000, roughly equivalent to New York's homeless population. A strange mixture of characters populate the offshore world. British ex public schoolboys, Members of the world's intelligence services, global criminals, assorted lords and ladies, and bankers galore. With so much at stake for so many wealthy and powerful individuals, it may come as no surprise that Britain's offshore havens have developed their own curious mechanisms to prevent information from leaking out. Speaker 13: For many people who work off Sure. And you don't like what they're doing. It's very hard indeed to dissent, because they will be attacked personally with a degree of viciousness, which is quite extraordinary. Most of the time, the the the instruments of suppression are relatively sophisticated. You won't get promotion by doing this or your family won't like it. Speaker 2: It's not generally, let's Slam them in prison. That's far too crude. We are talking about very substantially, you know, the establishment, the British establishment in in these cases. The the mechanisms are very, very subtle. Sort of ostracism is is is one way of doing it. Mechanisms for, you know, if someone tries to to blow the whistle, you find all sorts of methods that aren't the might you know, Just fire them. You give them far too much work to do. You steer them in a different direction. Speaker 1: One person who is intimately familiar with how suppression works offshore is former Jersey senator and health minister, Stuart. In 2009, he leaked a report on a rogue nurse suspected of killing patients at Jersey's Hospital. Speaker 24: It all came to a head during a state's debate on Tuesday 10th March. Senator Stuart Syvray brought the sitting to a standstill, claiming senator Jimmy Pershard sworn at him and told him to go and top himself. Senator Peirchard denied the claim saying, I absolutely refute that. But less than a week later, he was forced to admit he'd lied. Senator Peirchard has now admitted that on another occasion, he Did tell senator Stuart Zivray to go and do everyone a favor and slit his wrists. Speaker 25: I was, Arrested at my house 1 morning, by, 6 plainclothes police officers. There were another 2 specialist data search police officers on hand and also another 2 police officers in full body armor of one of those battering rams they're kind of using drugs rates. So 10 police officers descended without a, without a search warrant. The property was turned over from top to bottom. All of the computers were seized and searched. All kinds of Private constituency data was stolen by the police. Speaker 1: Shortly after we began filming, a police officer exited the police station. As he hurried past, he grinned at the camera. The officer was on his way to test The sirens on his motorbike, which he did at intervals throughout much of the remainder of the interview. Speaker 25: When it came to prosecuting, Speaker 1: Stuart Syvret was prosecuted under the data protection law. Speaker 25: When the authorities were prosecuting me, I claimed that this This was a legitimate public interest disclosure defense, and I, with an expert witness, was able to produce a set of reports that effectively Floyd, the prosecution case. Speaker 1: In reaction to this, the magistrates ruled that Stuart Sidre's defence case, that he had leaked the report in the public interest, would no longer be admissible, But continued to prosecute him all the same without a defense case. Over the past 7 years, Stuart has been repeatedly taken to court and imprisoned 3 times. He does not know when or if the persecution will end, nor does he know when he will find himself behind ours again. Speaker 25: To look at Jersey from the outside, it looks like it's got a prosecution system. It looks like it's got a court and a legislature, but none of it's real. It's a Potemkin village. None of these systems in Jersey meet the tests of being objective of being objective will actually functioning properly. Speaker 13: The experience that Stewart Sivray had is, you know, he's perhaps at the at the blunt simply suppressed and taken to court on trumped up charges. Speaker 25: Carry on 10 to the internet. They might report. This is the kind this is the kind of how oppression happens in Jersey, you see. All kinds of metal things get done to harass people, you know, even they don't often go to the kind of extremes that they did against me in actually arresting me and putting me in prison. But, the authorities use all kinds of other lesser little Methods to interfere with people, kind of sabotage things, you know, obstruct people, make life difficult for people. You know, if you annoy the establishments in Jersey, you won't get a job here. You know, you know, your children won't get decent jobs. You know, that's kind of how how it Speaker 13: I went to Jersey in, March 2009 with with Nick Schachsel. About 24 was after we arrived in Jersey. We were there for several days. Nick said, did you know that have you noticed that we're being followed? Ever since we arrived in At the airport, we've been followed. He said, don't look now, but we're being followed now. Turns out he was quite correct. We Were being followed. And I found that very disturbing, very disturbing indeed. Speaker 1: They have a saying in Jersey. If you don't like it here, there's always a boat in the morning. Jersey finance promotional literature States, Jersey represents an extension of the City of London. Speaker 13: It's where the City of London chooses to do mainly the activities which they couldn't do in London itself. Speaker 8: We're here to just talk about this one company called Appleby. I'll just what they say on their website. Members of the firm, Appleby, have gone on not only to political office, but also, in a number of centers, Bermuda, Jersey, the Isle of Man and the Cayman Islands to senior judicial office. So, essentially, they're boasting of the fact that their staff and their partners have a real interchange between the people that are in power in these offshore financial centers. Speaker 1: The same lawyers and accountants who set up and administer offshore trusts also occupy senior political positions. In Britain's offshore world, most politicians are in business. They lobby for business and promote business interests. They draft, refine, and pass legislation. Politicians sit on the boards of the companies they are supposed to Speaker 26: There is no place for dirty money in Britain. Indeed, there should be no place for dirty money anywhere. The challenge I'm laying down for every country today is to root out the rot of corruption to ensure transparency over what your own companies are doing, require transparency for foreign companies in your country too, And work with us to spread this approach to transparency around the world. Speaker 1: In public, British politicians claim they are cracking down on secrecy jurisdictions and corruption. But in practice, they Do the opposite. Speaker 13: And when I talk to politicians in Brussels, they say that they've had more lobbyists from London and including politicians, to come to them to protect the city of London's interests than they've had every other European member state combined, which gives you some idea of the extent to which British Speaker 14: We begin with our big story. Keyman's efforts to ensure transparency in its financial sector is being recognized by the international community. Earlier this week, the UK's prime minister David Cameron told parliament that the tax haven label placed on It's crown dependencies and overseas territories is unfair. Speaker 1: Many British politicians have personal and business ties with the City of London and British secrecy jurisdictions. Former British prime minister, David Cameron's father, Ian Cameron was an expert in offshore funds and was involved in offshore trusts from the 19 eighties onwards. Speaker 27: At this courthouse behind me here in Synch Helia, we found this. It's a document called a Grant of Pro debate, and it's attached to the English will of none other than Ian Cameron, David Cameron's father. Speaker 13: Hi, Mark. How are you? Good to see you. Speaker 27: Ian Cameron was certainly a wealthy man. In 2009, his personal fortune was estimated by researchers for the Sunday Times Rich List at ten £1,000,000. Yet, when Ian Cameron died in 2010, his estate was much smaller than might be expected, just £2,700,000. Speaker 13: In many cases, it's the politicians, and their cronies, and their families, and so on, and the business people who sponsor the political parties, who using these offshore services themselves. So they've got no personal interest in closing it down. If they wanted to close it down, they could do it tomorrow. The fact of the matter is they don't want to do it because they themselves are complicit with the process. Speaker 2: If you come from the same kind of background, you know the right people, Then all the kind of legal niceties of will will often fall away. You can get away with doing all sorts of things that they wouldn't just let any old And, you know, if you came knocking on the door saying, can you set up an offshore company to do this? They'd tell you to get lost. But if you're part of the networks, you can do these kinds of things. So that's a very important part of the, part of the whole system. Upper class British public school kind of, establishment that has been there since, you know, for centuries. Speaker 1: The British establishment, an old boy's network of privileged elites, From administrators of Empire into financial handlers for the global elite and multinational corporations. As more money flowed offshore, societies around the globe began to feel the impact of the offshore world. Speaker 16: The reality is not What you believe that, your prime minister has, the power to to decide on the future of your country? The power is hidden here. Speaker 6: We have country after country around the world where the lack of financial Transparency about taxation, about ownership, about corruption has undermined the extent to which governments deliver representative policy making for their citizens. You know, we have extreme cases like the hiding of tax evasion by people in finance ministries in Greece, in France. But we also have This system that in general is geared towards anonymous company ownership, the anonymous ownership of properties across London, of half of the land in Do we really think that any circumstances in which governments work better, in which markets work better, in In which the distribution of income and assets is better, when we allow so much to be hidden. Who wants to not know who you're doing business with, who wants their government to have people working for it or to be led by direction for the world. Speaker 16: We need the citizens to understand what is happening, that they are the ones who is carrying the burden, and that, some individuals having the power are exonerating themselves. Ordinary people are paying taxes. Rich people are not. So this is inequality, and it is leading up to populism because it shows so clearly that the people today leading the world are not able to take care of the interest of ordinary people. Speaker 2: Back in the sixties and you know, tax evasion or or pushing back against taxation. It was kind of seen as anti establishment. So, you know, Rolling Stones and, Phil Collins, all these people kind of going offshore, going away. It was seen as a sort of rebellious thing to do. And if you Fast forward to the present day, now that is the establishment. The offshore system is the establishment. Speaker 1: Today, offshore is the way elites and multinational corporations conduct their affairs. Tax evasion is the way business is done. Speaker 13: This kind of sophisticated cheating requires a huge infrastructure. We like to Talk about the pinstriped infrastructure of highly educated people who think it is their right to help others to cheat societies. Speaker 28: We have a new mafia in town. It does not actually shoot people, does not put bullets in their kneecaps, But this trade is just as deadly. It deprives people of opportunities to have health care, education, Security, justice, and, essentially, a fulfilling life. Speaker 1: Accountants form the backbone of the offshore system. They administer the structures that allow individuals and corporations to shift their money offshore and evade taxes. Speaker 28: There are about 2,500,000 professionally qualified accountants on this planet. About 330,000 are in the UK. Speaker 12: Well known people, well dressed, well fed, highly paid of sitting in city center offices, and they are paid to dream up tax avoidance schemes for individuals and for corporations. Speaker 28: We can all elect a government which says, vote for us. We will give you better health care, better education, better security. Next day, accountant says, sorry about that, folks. You elected this government, but we actually got a tax avoidance scheme. The Amazons and the Google won't be paying any taxes in your jurisdiction. Too bad you voted for it, but actually, you're gonna get something else. Speaker 12: So it's a crazy world that part of the business model at big accountancy firms is how to deny public the services by erosion of tax revenues. And these firms are then rewarded with government funded contracts. And the same firms are then advising, go local governments and the central government. And the same firms then report on the company accounts and tell us all is well. Speaker 28: When I argue this with a price order house Partner in a face to face debate. He said, Professor Sikai, you never give us credit for anything. We generate 1,000,000 of dollars of revenues, And we have lots and lots of satisfied clients. What is your problem? And my response was very simple. That's the language of drug pushers and pimps. Speaker 1: In Britain, a new breed of civil servant was rising to the top. One such civil servant was Dave Hartnett, Who rose to the top of HMRC, the UK tax authority. Dave Hartnett had a new way of collecting tax. Deals would be negotiated on an individual basis behind closed doors. In the case of the largest clients, Dave Hartnett frequently led the negotiations himself. British Telecom was one of the first companies through the programme And received a refund of over £1,000,000,000. BT's chief executive, Ben Theveian wrote, earnings per share up 14% And nice to know that we have a £1,000,000,000 credit from the taxman. Dave Hartnett claimed this approach was more efficient. Speaker 29: Litigation in the courts is really phenomenally expensive in this day and age all over the world. And I think it's to be avoided where possible. And the art is to persuade people to pay by strength of argument and the like. Speaker 1: After protests erupted in 2011, the treasury select committee questioned Dave Hartnett. Dave Hartnett claimed he could not give any information due to taxpayer confidentiality. Speaker 29: What in statute prevents you from disclosing information to parliament? All my advice, mister so far has been that, I am prevented, and my colleagues are prevented, by the Act and by the decision of the commissioners. Speaker 1: Dave Hartnett failed to mention that the legal advice he had received stated that the disclosure of information was at the discretion of the head of HMRC. The head of HMRC was Dave net himself. Speaker 28: Just like the mafia has penetrated the state, accountancy firms have also penetrated the state. The head of anti avoidance in the UK, tax authority, is from one of these firms. The newly appointed chairman of her majesty's revenue and customs, which is a tax authority, is a partner from KPMG. Their partners have penetrated the state. They are running the treasury. Speaker 1: Britain's financial services industry had penetrated the state and began to shape its laws for its own benefit. Speaker 13: The degree of capture political capture by the City of London, by the big banks and the big law firms, is so enormous that the politicians have effectively become their spokespersons. Speaker 1: With the government unwilling to act in the interest of the public, a group of protesters confronted Dave Hartmut at a private event in Oxford. Speaker 30: Hi, everybody. I'm sorry to interrupt. It's gonna take a few moments of your time. Here tonight to present today's hidden awards is the Lifetime Time achievements award for services to corporate tax planning. Speaker 31: Thank you. Thank you very much. Speaker 20: David has Speaker 30: been a great friend in the industry, a great friend to many of us over the years, and, you know, really, we just can't thank him enough What he's done Speaker 31: And obviously, it was at Vodafone. You know, it saved us 1,000,000,000, off our tax bill. And our friends at Goldman Sachs as well, we've also Speaker 30: Saved just 1,000,000 2025 1,000,000 Speaker 3: in a These people are trespassers and intruders. Speaker 31: And I know you've had problems with actually, Speaker 2: this has done Speaker 3: a lot more and they will go soon. Destroyed. We will depart immediately before we set the dogs on you. Speaker 13: Okay. Go. Speaker 30: I'm sorry. Please You're Speaker 1: After his retirement, Dave Hartnett moved to the private sector. One of his positions was at accountancy firm Deloitte where he advises foreign governments on corporate taxation. Dave Hartnett is a companion of the Order of the Bath, an honor bestowed on him by the British monarch. Speaker 12: We have former, Lear ministers acting as advisers to Accountancy firms. Accountancy firms provide jobs and consultancies for potential ministers. To my mind, really, it's an indication of corrupt structures. People are buying and selling influences. When a mere former minister works for an accountancy firm, he's not providing any accounting knowledge. Is opening political opportunities home and abroad. That is what they are doing. Speaker 13: I hope by now you'll share my views that I don't trust most bankers, I don't trust most lawyers, I don't trust most accounting firms. I actually think they're engaged in a conspiracy against public interest. Speaker 1: In Britain, secrecy and complexity in finance and government Help to obscure corruption in public office. Financial structures are often so complex that even after they are publicly revealed, They are not widely recognized for what they are. An example of this is PFI, the private initiative. Speaker 32: PFI is private finance initiative. It is a way of funding public infrastructure, Things like hospitals, schools, roads and bridges, but financing them via the private sector rather than historical method, which is via central government. Over a period of 30 or 40 years, the amounts of kind of repayment costs will be sort of 3 or 4 times higher overall than if you borrowed it from central government in the 1st place. So it's basically a giant accounting scam. Once the PFI policy has been set up, you find that the big four accountancy firms were actually, Paid members of staff within the treasury department, who were then actually going around and selling and advising upon the implementation of PFI by public authorities. Speaker 12: Effectively saying, come to us, and we will show you how to derive the most benefit from it. In other words, how to Perhaps exploit the legislation. Even the offices Speaker 32: of the state tax authority are now owned offshore. HMRC, which is the the tax collector here in the UK, their offices are owned in Bermuda by a company called Make These Steps, it's quite incredible. Speaker 1: The company that owns the PFI contract to run HMRC's head office, borrowed money from offshore investors at 15% interest. Because the interest was so high, the company was losing money. Therefore, it did not pay tax. In 2011, HMRC could not prove that any PFI company was paying any tax in the UK. Speaker 32: I think we need to have a serious conversation about the the role of government in this whole debacle and how much our government is being penetrated by Big banks and accountancy firms and, ultimately, in whose interest it operates. The reason we were protesting outside the Africa PPP conference is that we wanted to make sure that Citizens back in Africa should hear about the fact that such policies have been a complete failure here in the UK. We know that these products are not being marketed to African countries in their own best interests. The only motivation is to spread the reach of financial services into new markets. It's all being promoted in the interests of the City of London. What you're seeing is Basically, a second form of colonization. You've had, initially, occupation resource extraction. You know, And through that process, you know, countries like Britain, which have had a a large offshore empire, have developed significant networks. And now are those networks being used to promote and exploit financial services? Speaker 1: The city of London was was the beating financial heart of the British Empire. As Britain's empire declined, the city transformed itself from a hub Operating the financial machinery of empire into a global financial centre. Former insignificant outposts of empire became the basis for a spider's web of offshore secrecy jurisdictions that captured wealth from across the globe and funnelled it to the city of London. Today, 25% of international finance is conducted on British territory. Almost half of the world's secrecy jurisdictions are under British protection. Up to half of all offshore wealth may be hidden in Britain's offshore havens. Financial services is how Britain's elites make their money. And it is also where former government ministers, senior civil servants, and retired from Mi5 and Mi6 receive lucrative consulting positions after their time in public service. Together, they have transformed Britain and its dependencies into the world's largest tax haven, Harming development throughout the world, and turning Britain itself into a country that serves, above all, the interests of its elites.
Saved - February 8, 2024 at 4:15 PM

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

THE SECRET BROTHERHOOD AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA Full Documentary To all who claim to understand the NWO agenda. If you don't know the history, how can you begin to comprehend the evil you are seeing today? Let's go back to the origins of the Secret Brotherhood. https://t.co/OLd8xiRB6J

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the existence of the Illuminati, a secret society that aims to control the world. It explores the history of secret societies such as the Masons and the Assassins, as well as the Templars and the Priory of Zion. The video claims that the Illuminati infiltrated the KGB and the Vatican, and that they have positioned weapons around the world for future use. It suggests that the Illuminati's ultimate goal is to create a one-world government. The video concludes by warning viewers about the potential threat posed by the Illuminati and the need to expose their activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there at this very moment a global secret brotherhood plotting to control the world? For even worse, is the shocking plan already in motion? Have devastating weapons already been positioned around the world caused catastrophic results. Can it be stopped? Hello. I'm Patrick McNehee. The Illuminati is said to be a global secret society that has been operating for centuries. A hidden brotherhood that includes some of the world's most influential people. People of all races and religions That hold top positions in government, churches, business, education, science, medicine, military, financial, And charitable institutions. A secret fraternity whose sole purpose Is to take over control of the entire world's resources, finances and its people. If such a powerful secret society does exist, it represents the ultimate threat to the free world. In fact, it means that right now there is actually no free world at all. Some say it's preposterous, but now for the first Time ever, we have obtained proof that not only such a global secret organization does exist but it has Infiltrated 2 of the most powerful intelligence agencies in the world. What's more, weapons of mass destruction have been hidden in the USA and other countries for future use. How could this happen? To get to the truth, we must first explore the dark reaches of the world's secret societies whose history, rituals and very existence are shrouded in mystery. Secret societies have existed for 1000 of years. They all have one thing in common, unique knowledge, which they swear by oath to keep secret. For armed with this knowledge limited to themselves, they believe they can control others. One of the earliest secret societies still exists today, the Masons. It is believed that its origins date back to ancient Egypt when only a select guild of stone workers possessed special mathematical knowledge necessary for building the pyramids. Throughout history, masons kept their methods to themselves so that only they could build the great structures throughout time that still will stand today. 1st, the pyramids and on to the great castles and cathedrals of Europe. But secret societies were not limited to tradesmen. The word assassin has its roots in a secret Brotherhood of Shiite Muslim warriors that controlled northern Syria during the time of the early Crusades in 11th century. Their speciality, they had perfected the art of killing. The set was founded by founded by Hassan I Sabbah, called the old man at the mountain, who ruled from a remote stronghold. Hassan indoctrinated his devotees with the promise that if they fought and died for Allah, they would live forever in paradise, full of heavenly and earthly pleasures. He used the gruesome power of torture and murder to give his teachings special impact and assure complete discipline and devotion. Hassan gave Hashish to his fanatical disciples to induce a feeling of invincibility before sending them on suicide missions. Hence, the name assassin was derived from the word Hashashin or hashish user. By 1100, the assassins were said to number over 70,000 fanatically devoted members. About the same time in history, another secret brotherhood was created, the Templars. The Priore de Sion Priory of Zion was a chivalrous fraternity created in medieval France with the purpose of preserving the Merovingian bloodline and returning them to the throne of France. Their official headquarters was the abbey of Notre Madame du Monde de Sion in Jerusalem. In 1117, Baldwin the First, king of Jerusalem, found himself greatly indebted to the Priory for their services in helping him attain the throne. In return, the king negotiated the constitution of the Knights Templar as the military and administrative arm of the its templar as the military and administrative arm of the Priory of Zion. The Knights templar had been created 10 years before for the purpose of safeguarding pilgrims on the road to the holy land. During their time in the Middle East, the Templars had contact with the Muslims, including the assassins. In fact, after the crusades, because of the enemies they had in common, the assassins took refuge among the Templars, imprinting the Christian soldiers with much of their fanatical and deadly ideas. As the Templars developed, they came not at all an orthodox Christian organization. But their secret rituals and doctrine were much more mystical, heretic and or cult oriented. As the power of the Templars grew, the brotherhood developed into a church within the church, Handling their own banking, revoking excommunications issued by bishops, and they answered only to the pope. Speaker 1: Everything about the Knights Templar has at least an element of mystery about it Right from its beginnings, it was founded just after the First Crusade, which had reopened the way between Europe and the Holy Land. And in about 11/18, 9 French knights, all of whom were Connected with the court of the Count of Champagne went over to the Holy Land with this mission, they said, To protect the roads and the pilgrimage routes, to make them safe for pilgrims who would now be able to visit the holy places. Now once they arrived in the Holy Land, there's actually no evidence that they did anything for 9 years or so. And right from the beginning, there's something that doesn't quite connect. And there's other evidence that This mission of protecting the pilgrimage route was actually just a cover story that she went there for another reason. For some reason, these 9 knights thought that There was something to be found there. There's certainly evidence that they excavated beneath the temple mount. Archaeologists have actually found Temporal artifacts from those excavations. Speaker 0: As it turns out, the Templars spent very little time on the roads at all. Most of their 9 year stay was spent digging out old tunnels under the Temple Mount, the original site of the biblical Temple of Solomon. What were they looking for? The temples of Solomon had long since been destroyed. Yet in times of trouble, the priests were known to have hidden religious treasures in secret underground vaults until it was safe to remove them. The Bible tells us that the ark of the covenant and other treasures of the temple survived several foreign invasions in this way. Perhaps the Holy Grail had survived in the labyrinth under the Temple as well, waiting for man to rediscover its power. Certainly, it was no accident that the knights stationed themselves in a mosque that rested on the ancient site. In fact, it was after their stay that they changed their name to the Knights of the Temple or the Knights Templar. A monk by the name of Bernard, who later became Saint Bernard, was involved in the formation of the Templars. Saint Bernard was involved in deciphering ancient Hebrew text. Speaker 1: Bernard, although in many ways a very worldly person, Was also very spiritual in ways that are quite odd for his time. He was very much into The feminine side of religion, very much into the Black Madonna cults of, Particularly of the south of France, which are very kind of mysterious, almost pagan. We had a great veneration For for the for the feminine, embodied in lots of ways in the Virgin Mary, which was actually quite unusual for his time. And that appears to be the thing that drove him more than anything else. St. Bernard was a very learned man, again, for his time. Yes, he studied Hebrew texts, so the other texts is well. It could well be something that you found in there that gave these people the idea that there's something worth having in Jerusalem. It's speculative, but it's a good speculation. It seems a very logical thing. You have people studying these old documents Who suddenly want to get their people to some of these old places mentioned in these documents. They're looking for something. Personally, I honestly don't know what it was they found except that it was people considered it important. Nobody knows for sure. Whatever it was, nobody knows where it went. And it's a real mystery. But as far as there's no shortage of theories, Any of which could be correct. Documents, Ark of the Covenant, Holy Grail, whatever that is, But they certainly had their secret. Speaker 0: A very old text records the find. We repaired to the secret vault and let down one of the companions as before. The sun at this time was at its meridian height. The rays of which enabled him to discover a small box or chest standing on a pedestal curiously wrought and overlaid with gold. He gave The signal of ascending, and it was immediately drawn out. We have brought it up for the examination of the Grand Council. Just what was in this small box that got the Templars so excited? Clearly, a group of Christian knights, bound by the vow of poverty, were not interested in anything of material value. More likely, it was an object to great religious significance. To this day, we still do not know exactly What the Templars found in the secret vault? What we do know is that news of the fine brought Count Hughes of Champagne, the man who bankrolled the expedition back to Jerusalem to join his former vassals. Once there, He immediately gave up all his worldly possessions to serve under them as one of the Knights Templar. It was after this discovery that the grand master of the Templars visited the pope. And with Saint Bernard's blessing, the order of the Knights Templar, was officially recognized by the church. All over Christendom, men rushed to join the knights, leaving behind their families, giving over all their worldly possessions, and taking on the difficult vows of poverty and chastity. Speaker 1: Now poverty, Actually, it's why they became wealthy because anybody that joined the order, anyone that became a Templar Knight, Had to give all their possessions to the order. And it became quite a prestigious thing for noble is to have some of their sums go into the temporal order. And of course, any money and property they had would go into the coffers. Also, when the pope endorsed The order gave his blessing, and he said, this is a good thing. Anyone that wanted to impress the pope donated Land and money to this new order. And actually on a colossal scale, none of the individual knights were allowed to own anything. So all this material that you had land, castles, livestock and just pure money That was just given to them as a gift, went towards the order. Their reputation was as the most feared, Efficient fighting force on the Christian side. They were kind of the special forces of their time, Also because they were this mixture of monk and a soldier. Speaker 0: The Knights Templar had quite a career After the Crusades, they basically took over Europe financially, dominating all of the major industries, especially that of money lending. They invented the modern checking system and within a few years had all of Europe's kings indebted to them. Speaker 2: They were far too big for their boots in many respects as as far certainly as far as the pope and many kings were concerned. They were unbelievably rich. It seemed there was no stopping them, basically. Most historians believe that they got their comeuppance because of their wealth. Essentially, the French king who started the suppression of the Templars, Philip the Fair, essentially that he was jealous of their great wealth. And it is generally thought that he used, accusations of blasphemy, and sacrilege against them. But really, he wanted their money. The charges against the Templars were blasphemy and sacrilege, and that They, failed to observe the usual reverence of the church, but that was well known. There were sexual elements in the charges, Yes. But then there always are when you think about it in charges against heretical groups. They were accused of sodomy, of homosexual acts. They were accused of, spitting and trampling upon the cross, of, worshiping not just a bearded severed head, but in some extraordinary, cases. They were accused of worshiping severed head of a cat. Speaker 0: The Catholic church got confessions that it needed to suppress the tempers. On Friday 13th 13 07, the pope officially banded the order of knights. Their grand master was burned at the stake. By the middle of 1300, the Knights of Templar seemed to have completely disappeared and their treasury confiscated. But Could the richest and most powerful brotherhood on earth and all their wealth be rounded up and seized almost overnight? No. The highly trained and organized Templars only went quickly underground taking most of their wealth with them. They evolved into an Enormously powerful and well financed secret society. Indeed, as history unfolded, the facts show that Templars never went anywhere except out of the public view, but with one added dimension, an extreme hatred for the Catholic Church. At the same time, the Priory of Zion assumed that they would meet a similar fate from the church. They do seem to disappear, but again, only from the public eye. Over more than 400 years from the 14th through the late 18th centuries, the Masons, assassins, the Priory of Zion and the Templars existed as relatively isolated secret societies With a limited reach until on May 1, 17, 76, in Bavaria, The human race saw what might be its darkest day. Adam Wychup, A Jesuit trained professor of canon law, well versed in the occult, formed a new secret organization that would unite all the secret societies for an unthinkable purpose, to gain complete control over the world and its resources and to achieve total domination of its people. WiteOut euphemistically described it as a new world order. His diabolical brotherhood was founded on a synthesis of the themes of secret societies that had gone before. He skillfully combined masonic secret rituals and knowledge. The assassin's Islamic mysticism, killing arts, and use of hashish. The area of Zion's influential membership, and the Templars wealth, power, military science, and vendetta against the Catholic church. To that, he added his own knowledge of the occult. It was not an accident that he chose May 1st, a very important date on the satanic capital, for the founding of his society. The group was called the Illuminati. The public translation was intellectually inspired. But Weishaupt himself said in private that the word was derived from Lucifer and meant holders of the light. The official seal of the brotherhood was a mystical, unfinished pyramid, and an eye above it with rays of light emanating in all directions. The eye represented the all seeing or knowing nature of the illuminated brotherhood reigning above the world. To his followers, the founder listed the 5 top secret primary means that will be used to accomplish his dark goal of total world domination. 1, monetary and sex bribery would be used to gain control of men already in high places in the various its levels of all government and other fields of endeavor. 2, the Illuminati who were on the faculty of colleges and universities were to cultivate the best students for the cause. 3, influential people and specially trained Students under control of the brotherhood would be placed behind the scenes of all government, religious, and financial institutions and used as agents. 4, the secret society would develop absolute domination of the media dear, so that all news and information could be slanted to convince the masses that a one world government is the only solution to our many 5. The final phase of the operation would employ all resources in place to initiate military coups that would throw all opposing governments, and put the world under 1 global government controlled by the Illuminati. The group was originally composed of 32nd degree masons and used various masonic lodges as recruiting grounds and fronts. The highest ranking mason to be recruited was a nobleman from North Germany, Baron Keneige, also known as Adolphe Francis, a major player in the European masonic sea. The Illuminati were extremely secretive, even identifying themselves and their chapters by assumed Classical names, for examples, Weishaupt was Spartacus. Nagy was Philo. The headquarters was Eleusis. Austria was Egypt, etcetera. Dates were given in a sort of cryptography. Under Konegys' guidance, the ranks of the Illuminati it grew to over 3,000. But so much rapid success also brought opposition. The Jesuits especially had fought the Illuminati from the first, and eventually, all priests became its active enemies. The Catholic church went on the offensive against the secret brotherhood. In fact, priests raised so much opposition that the governor of Bavaria feared the Illuminati to be an outlaw conspiracy by Edict in 17/84. Many Illuminati were imprisoned, and some, including Weishaupt, were forced to flee the country. Soon, not only illuminism, but also freemasonry was forced out of Bavaria. By the end of 18th century, the Illuminati seemed to have completely disappeared everywhere. But the Illuminati was not really gone any more than the secret societies just preceded them. They just went underground and added one more item to their list of dark goals. Infiltrate, and bring down the Catholic religion. When we look around the world today, What do we see of the secret societies? Masonic chapters exist in the open all around the globe As a mainstream organization, the Order of Knights Templar today exists as the top ranking masonic organization in the York Rite of Freemasonry. What goes on inside masonic halls is still relatively secret. Probably known only to their upper echelon members are the dark rituals, goals and the vendetta against the Catholic Church. The Masons and Templars have very effectively integrated themselves into the world's most respected societies. To a lesser degree, the assassins have appeared publicly periodically throughout history. In the early 1800, they were visible in India as they came under the direction of the Aga Khan, who they believe possessed divine powers. In the latter 1800, the Aga Khan brought them to Afghanistan where they developed a lasting relationship with the British. Later, the Ag Khan's descendants further infiltrated Western culture. One prominent example was when Prince Ali Aga Khan, grandson of Aga Khan married American actress Rita Hayworth. Are the assassins, as a secret murderous order, Order, now a thing of the past. The bloodshed occurring today at the hands of Islamic extremists would say The assassins are alive and well. The Priory of Zion also continues to this day. In fact, it has been reported that a number of illustrious figures in history have served as the priory's grandmasters. And there is corroborating evidence. In 1975, a discovery was made in a Parisian library. A hatchments were found called the Dossier a lacqueray. These documents indeed reveal that some of the secret members were Leonardo da Vinci, Victor Hugo, and and sir Isaac Newton. The priory has been credited by some with the creation of the European Union. Former president of France, Francois Mitterrand, was believed to be a member of the priory and many other powerful people. As for the Mereovindian bloodline, the scions were pledged to protect. It continues on. Through incestuous intermarriage, most of the royal families of Europe can claim Merovingian descent. And it is said that from these royal families have come all 44 of the United States presidents. These connections around the world through the Priory of Zion provided the Illuminati with the means to influence politics and power around the globe. But what about the most secret society of them all, Adam Weishaupt's Illuminati, The brotherhood that vowed to bring all the other secret societies together to control the world. Is it still actively pursuing its diabolical plan of world domination? Indeed, shocking new facts that we have uncovered reveal that it is stronger than ever today. Studying a top secret society is much like studying The current of a lake. The ripples on the surface give us clues to know what is going on in the darkness below. The Illuminati's grand plan required that it infiltrate the governments of all countries around the world. In our extensive investigation, we focused on just one target, the former Soviet Union, to see how it was manipulated by the Illuminati. An effective way to gain control of a government would be to penetrate its intelligent structures. Newly released information from the files of the KGB provides some Unprecedented insight. Now that the Cold War is over, some highly classified information is being smuggled out of carefully guarded vaults in what used to be the Soviet Union. With the change to a market economy here, many items never before available to Russians are finding their way to the black market. They say that everything is for sale in the new Russia, including state secrets and the spies who kept them. After the collapse of the Soviet Union came the resolving of the KGB. The new government formed its own new security and intelligence agencies, employing many of the old KGB personnel, but leaving many without jobs. Even those with employment were often not paid as promised. We found that many former KGB employees were eager to give firsthand accounts of their classified activities within the agency for the right price. However, when the subject of the Illuminati was introduced, No amount of money could induce anyone to talk about it. We took this as a The former KGB employees were willing to direct us to black market sources where we might obtain further information, but at our own peril. Though most leads proved to be ultimately unproductive, we found that with perseverance, money and a bit of luck, it is possible to acquire classified Soviet documents. Using a hidden camera, we recorded numerous meetings over a period of months in which we attempted to obtain relevant materials. This transaction between one of our SCO contacts, and black market dealers proved to be one of the more successful ventures. Those you'll see, Not without a few tense moments. Finally safe from the black market dealers, within some of these documents, we found corroboration for the most valuable piece of information related to us by the ex KGB agents. Just as we had been told, indeed, The KGB carefully recorded their activities in documents, films, and tapes. And these were kept in storage in a holding facility beneath the KGB headquarters under the highest security. Beneath the KGB headquarters under the highest security. These were probably The most sensitive records possessed by the agency where they would illuminate in graphic detail the most intimate activities of the KGB and possibly the connection to the Illuminati. The documents we purchased from the black market dealers represented a major breakthrough. They not only confirmed that more revealing KGB materials existed, they also told us where they were kept. Again, we went to our black market sources now armed with this new knowledge. We believe that with the demise of the KGB, most of the safeguards protecting its records would be gone. Someone out there must have the knowledge and access to be able to supply them to us for a price. Over the course of the next 5 months, we employed our sources to try to obtain specifically these top secret records of the KGB. This transaction between one of our Moscow contacts, an interpreter, and a local black market dealer yielded Yes. Astonishing results. Speaker 1: I don't speak with just a few words. I'm sorry. Speaker 0: The location of this meeting is a textile factory in the Zikorniki district of Moscow. No. This is the office of the Russian entrepreneur who owns the plant and uses it for both legitimate and illegal business. After introductions and some initial small talk, the dealer is asked whether the KGB materials are on the premises. From a safe, documents are produced that relate to the films and tapes the dealer has promised to delete. After an inspection of the documents and a cursory verification of their authenticity, city. The transaction is complete. Okay. Well, thank you guys. Kasiba. Speaker 3: Kasiba. Speaker 1: Nice to Speaker 0: meet you. Money changes hands, and the tense group is led to another office where the films and tapes are said to be stored. And finally, the graphic film, tapes and documents we've heard about surfaced. Being revelation. Within the classified documents we obtained, we find proof that the Illuminati infiltrated the Soviet Union, and the KGB. These communiques between 2 high level KGB agents actually refer to the original illuminated one Adam Weishaupt by name. They go on to allude to a connection with 2 past rulers the Russia, Joseph Stalin, and Nikita Khrushchev. Our mission to place agents within the walls of the Vatican is a goal that the founder, Weishaupt, talked about 200 years ago. It is something that has been attempted through the years by both Stalin and Khrushchev with no success. But I believe we can finally do it this time. What's more, in the lab, our investigators made an alarming discovery. A magnified view reveals that an unnoticeable dot. The period at the end of the final sentence on the page is actually a seal. It is the unfinished pyramid with an iron triangle above it. The official insignia of the Illuminati, a marking used by by the secret society since its creation in 17 76. The KGB was determined to infiltrate The Vatican. Why would this of all places be of such critical interest to the Russians? The answer is simple. The Russians would have no interest in the Vatican but the Illuminati would. Not only would it further the vendetta against the Catholics, but it would be important for the greater purpose of gaining control of the world. The Vatican may be the most powerful force on the planet for influencing people. Policies dictated by the Vatican affect 1,000,000,000 people spread across the globe on every continent in comparison to less than 300,000,000 under the direct influence of the US or the former USSR. Reigning at the top of this vast empire of followers is one man, the pope, whose words and wishes are considered by his followers to have divine Inspiration. No other person on Earth has such extraordinary power and influence. The Illuminati would have a great interest in exerting whatever influence they could on the pope and his advisers. The KGB had a staff of agents permanently assigned to Rome. But the Vatican City exists is a very closed world, an officially recognized independent state with its own government. In effect, it is a sovereign state existing within the city of Rome. Surveillance of it from the outside is very incomplete. From more secret KGB documents we have obtained, we learn that in 1970 2, the Illuminati using the people they had in the KGB formulated a bold plan to position one of their people within the walls of the Again, the period at the end of the final sentence on the document is actually the miniature pyramid and eye, the official insignia of the Illuminati. At last, the Secret Brotherhood could begin to control the Catholic church from the inside. An agent was sent to the Vatican posing as a Ukrainian priest, driven from his country by the communists for anti communist rhetoric. He was quickly accepted by the pro American Vatican clergy. After only a few months, he achieved his primary objective, gaining the confidence of the office of cardinal Wilho, the secretary of state of pope Paul the 6. In this exclusive KGB film footage we obtained, on the right is the agent posing as a priest. On the left is the chief assistant to cardinal Vilo. The third man is actually another KGB agent, no doubt placed in the organization by the Illuminati. He's also seeking to gain access to the cardinal. When Vilo's assistant is sent on his customary monthly trip to Milan, the KGB installs a camera in his hotel room. In typical KGB fashion, the priest is about to be set up to be black male, to assure his continued cooperation. Over several days, a woman becomes friendly with him and gains his trust. The film shows that the trap was well set. One night, the woman comes to his room to take him to a dinner meeting. While he is briefly away pouring drinks, she takes off her blouse. But no matter what the outcome of the encounter was, the brief shot of this priest with a half Dressed woman in his room is damaging enough to guarantee his future assistance in the surveillance of Vilo's activities. Certainly, in the near future, the Illuminati controlled KGB agents will begin looking for ways to manipulate Vilo himself. Once that is accomplished, they will be extremely close to the very heart of the Catholic religion, pope Paul VI. But it appears that the Illuminati was not content with exerting only influence to control the Vatican. They sometimes resorted to murder. Since the founding of the Illuminati, a number of officials have died at the Vatican under highly suspicious circumstances, including 3 popes. In each case, the death of the official was timed so as to have a great political significance, the telltale mark of the secret Brit brotherhood influencing world politics for their benefit. In 1939, pope Pius the 11th was poised to release a statement condemning both the Nazis and the fascists, groups doing the kind of evil that the Illuminati Artie would be behind. But before he could make the public statement, he suddenly died. A close assistant, Cardinal Diceron, was heard to repeat again and again in French. They have assassinated him. They have assassinated him.' His body was quickly embalmed, making an autopsy and proof of cause of death impossible. In 1978, It seemed the secret brotherhood might again be using murder to manipulate the papacy. Paul the 6th suddenly died. Admittedly, he was frail, but the sudden worsening of his condition seemed all too convenient to many observers. However, this time, The Illuminati architects got a result they probably were not expecting. A pope who would be at odds with them. John Paul the first. Almost immediately after he took office, the new pope showed a great deal of independence. It seemed that John Paul had a special Taste for the corruption he had seen was rampant in the Vatican's finances. While he was the cardinal of Venice, the Venetian Catholic Bank was sold in a secret deal to the Vatican Bank for a greatly undervalued amount. Profits reaped by a Few were estimated at more than $70,000,000, but the losses to the Venetians were great. The clergy of Venice even lost their pension fund. Instrumental in the deal were bankers, Roberto Calvi, his mentor, Sindona, and the director of the Vatican Bank, Bishop Marcinkus. After John Paul became pope, These 3 were still in charge of investing much of the church's money. In his new position, the pontiff had the power to investigate them and publicly bring out the facts. Altogether, he was poised to uncover illegal dealings that involved almost a $1,000,000,000. This would be a serious blow to the Illuminati who were certainly behind the criminal financial dealings. The danger to the pope became shockingly clear one day at a private meeting between John Paul and a Russian Orthodox archbishop, Nikodim. As the meeting began, coffee was poured. Mikodim took the first sip. And almost immediately collapsed to the floor and died. His face was very contorted in a horrible and unnatural grimace as if the death was very painful. The sun pope carefully put down his own cup before he Certainly, it came to his mind that the coffee must have been laced with poison that was meant for healing. The official doctor, however, quickly proclaimed that the archbishop had died from what had become the standard cause for deaths at the Vatican, a massive coronary. All the facts surrounding the mysterious death of the Russian archbishop, Nikodim, pointed toward an assassination attempt and a cover up. The Russian's body was embalmed very quickly after his death without a prior complete medical examination. After the embalming, it would be impossible to perform an accurate autopsy to determine the cause of death, particularly If it involved poison. Also, the coffee the Archbishop drank was never collected for analysis and no Forensic investigation was ever carried out. Although the proof was gone, to many, it was clear That the Pope had narrowly escaped being murdered only 10 days after he was elected? The experience proved so frightening that John Paul called a secret meeting with his top four cardinals to discuss the situation. The meeting took place on September 28, 1978. Only the 4 cardinals and the pope were in the room. To this day, it has not known exactly what was said. But afterwards, the pope was moved to take action. He ended the term of cardinal Vilo as secretary of state. This was the same cardinal Vilo whose assistant had been blackmailed in the KGB films taken in 1972. Over the 6 years, this cardinal must have also been drawn into the Illuminati's web. Removing him meant that the pope had uncovered at least part of the dark secret. But even John Paul could not avoid his fate at the hands of the Illuminati. That night, the pontiff retired earlier than usual and took with him detailed notes of the secret meeting to deliberate upon. At 5 AM the next morning, the pope's closest attendant, Sister Vincenzo, became concerned. His Holiness had never overslept before. She peered inside his door. John Paul appeared to be sitting in bed with the light on as if he were reading. Various papers were around him. But to her horror, his face was frozen in the same agonized contortion she had seen on the face of the dead Russian, Nikotim, only days before. After only 33 days as pope, John Paul was dead. After more than 200 fears of protecting their secret ways. The Illuminati was very thorough at covering its tracks. Although the pope had relieved him of his secretary of to his state duties just hours before, cardinal Vilo took charge. As a senior cardinal, He was now, in essence, the temporary pope. He first locked himself in the papal bedroom and collected prescription medicine from the bed table and most of the papers in the room, including notes of the secret meeting. Also taken were the candies the pontiff often enjoyed while reading and even the pope's reading glasses and slippers, all these items were never seen again. Next, Next, Vilo sent sister Vincenzo away to a convent after forbidding her to tell anyone that she had found the pontiff dead and anything about What she saw. And then at 6:10 AM, he ordered embalmers to be summoned. But the most shocking occurrence of all was that they arrived almost immediately. It was estimated that given the distance the environment had to travel, they must have been contacted at 4:45 AM, 15 minutes before the time that the sister had discovered the pope. At 7:30 AM, a public announcement was issued. The cause of death was heart failure. Instead of sister Vincenca, it was reported that the pope's secretary, Monsignor betray Monsignor Maggie had found the body and the time of discovery was changed to 5:30. By the time of the announcement, the embalmers had already done their work just as in the all too similar death of the Russian arch Bishop only 23 days before any possibility of a 100% accurate autopsy was eliminated. If foul play was involved in the death of John Paul the first, the chance to prove it was conclusively gone forever. 10 days after John Paul's funeral, cardinal Villeau assemble the conclave to elect a successor. The official electing body includes a 111 cardinals. Once sequestered in the Sistine Chapel, the cardinals must invoke the power of the Holy Ghost to guide them to their decision. But in truth, the principal candidates for pope are not determined behind the closed doors of the Oh, Clay, these decisions are made in the elegant restaurants of Rome, where the most powerful cardinals meet for their dinners and lunches. When the cardinals finally entered the cistern chapel for the closed door session Sunday morning, October 15, 1978, It became the scene of a theater of political manipulation on all levels, from promises whispered between cardinals, to heated debates with each ballad, tensions elevated. After the 8th ballad, white Smoke billowed up from the Vatican, signaling that a new pope had been elected. It also signaled A staggering defeat for the KGB and the Illuminati. The new pontiff was a staunchly anti communist Pole, John Paul the second. But the Illuminati does not accept defeat easily. On May 13, 1981, Mehmet Ali Agca, a man wanted in Turkey for murder, stood outside the Vatican basilica in the crowd waiting for the pope to ride through. According to Ali Aker's own account, John Paul came out of the Vatican about 5 PM in a white Cheap. As the pope came by, Arriaga pulled a pistol out and fired 3 times before being wrestled to the ground by the crowd. The plantain was seriously wounded, but he would recover to continue his papers. At first, Sarajak asserted that he had acted on his own. But investigators became convinced that a much larger conspiracy had used the obviously unstable and dangerous man as a tool for assassination. Soon, Ali Agca admitted that the shooting was part of a Bulgarian conspiracy masterminded by the KGB. But, of course, both Bulgaria and the Soviet Union denied any involvement. When the jury announced Ali Agba's conviction and life sentence, he seemed shocked that he'd been left to bear the responsibility for the November 25, 1982, involved. On November 25, 1982, sir Ivanov Antonov, an employee of the Bulgarian National Airline, was arrested in Rome and charged with involvement in the assassination attempt. Soon, the list widened to include 3 other Bulgarians, and 4 Turks. In July 1983, as Adka was being transported to another facility, the world saw him publicly admit the KGB connection as he shouted to reporters that the KGB and Bulgarian intelligence services were involved. Later, he explained that he had been trained in Bulgaria and Syria by KGB experts in international terrorism. He also admitted that Antonov was an accomplice along with 2 Bulgarian embassy employees. In 1984, Italian Judge Lario Martella was convinced that the KGB and the Bulgarian Service were involved in the assassination attempt on Pope John Paul the second. The judge released this finding based on the following facts. Agca used a perfectly forged passport to enable his entrance into Italy, something available only from Highly sophisticated sources. He also had enough money to allow him to stay for extended periods in Bulgaria, Switzerland and several other European countries. There was evidence that he received substantial assistance in his activities in Italy leading up to the assassination attempt. In spring, the trial of 8 men accused of conspiring to kill the pope convened, and the facts began to emerge. During the trial, several Turkish defendants testified that they aided Agca in his travels from Turkey through Bulgaria to Italy. Another said he had made payments to Agca from the Bulgarians on trial. 1 admitted bring the assassination weapon to Agca in a Milan restaurant. By the 1980s, after 2 centuries of positioning their people in high places, The Illuminati had apparently gained control of the Italian courts. In the end, To the amazement of most observers, the Italian court found that there was insufficient evidence to convict the conspirators. The Adka case not only illustrated that the Secret Brotherhood had compromised the Italian judicial system. It also showed that the Illuminati had reached the very top of the KGB. In 1990, Viktor Ivanovich Sheymov, a KGB major, who defected to the US, made a shocking admission. Before he escaped from Russia in 1980, he received an order to obtain all the information possible how to get physically close to the pope. The order was signed by Yuri Andropov himself, at the time, the head of the KGB. The same Yuri Andropov who would only a few years later become the head of the Soviet Union. The Illuminati's final step to domination called for military coups around the world to seize power in order to create one global government controlled by them. To accomplish this, they would use the huge surplus lists of catastrophic weapons stockpiled in the USSR to threaten the entire world. Although the KGB was the most well known, it was not the only espionage entity run by the former USSR. Another agency just as massive, but even more secret than the KGB was the GRU, carrying out military intelligence. And the Secret Brotherhood went to great lengths to infiltrate it. The proof They were successful as revealed in these highly classified DRU agency documents that we've purchased from a black market document dealer in Russia. In them, an agent is given his orders to work using the cover of a journalist in Washington DC. Once again, the Illuminati has left their telltale sign. Period under high magnification is the pyramid and All Seeing Eye. While the KGB collected information on political figures and influenced politics surround the globe, the GRU gathered intelligence essential for achieving military objectives. Some of the activities of the GRU were aimed at achieving objectives in various ongoing conflicts such as Afghanistan. But the major mission of the GRU was to prepare for future wars with other countries, especially the USA. It was this agency that was ready made to be used to place the deadly weapons for the final phase of Illuminati's dark plan. The GRU operatives were perfectly trained for the operation. Speaker 3: In time of, Cold War beginning In the mid, in the end, actually, the whole time, of our military service, We view a use in, military preparation of the former Soviet Union for the future war against America. Speaker 0: Beside their military education, GRU operatives underwent 3 years of exhaustive training. They learned to use all the tools and techniques of the spy, and they became experts in explosives. Once fully trained, the g r u agents were moved to assignments in foreign countries. Some were given diplomatic covers and went to work in embassies. Others assumed positions as journalists. As is the case in the secret documents we obtained with the insignia of the Illuminati. One was Stanislav Luneth, a former GRU colonel who in 1992, after 20 years with the agency, would become Russia's highest ranking military officer to defect. In his book and in an exclusive interview with us, Lunaf gives a firsthand look into the GRU. Although his face was never shown, he would not even mention the Illuminati, although he never denied their existence or involvement in the GRU. He does, however, reveal some shocking facts. Speaker 3: In the United States, I worked in, Washington DC operational area, under the same cover as a task, newsagents, correspondent. It's very good cover because, you know, between journalists and spies, real spies, there are a lot of common because, all of them are looking for news and for real information. Speaker 0: Once in position in the field, the GRU agents had various tasks. 1 was to help coordinate terrorist campaigns To destabilize unfriendly government, GRU officials have now revealed that during the Vietnam War, the agency invested over $1,000,000,000 promoting the anti war campaign in the US. This Expertise at manipulating governments was a skill that fit exactly with the Illuminati's future plans for overthrowing governments. Another major part of the GRU's agents' work was laying the groundwork for Russian special forces, the Spetsnats. These elite troops under the GRU would penetrate countries to perform military sabotage when needed. Some would blow up strategic targets such as power stations, bridges, and communication centers. Others would form assassination squads to kill government leaders and their families. This was an ability of great value for the Illuminati for world domination. In order to bring the Russian special forces into foreign countries when required, The GRU needed to assure themselves that they would have access to cross the borders. For this, they relied on the expertise of the KGB. The agency excelled at gaining entry into unfriendly countries. They needed to be able to Consistently position their spies and smuggle out information. Again, the KGB often used sex, and blackmail to accomplish its goals. In this hidden camera film, the man on the right is a KGB agent acting as a raven. A male whose job is to seduce someone to commit espionage. This raven is in the process of setting up a Mexican border Speaker 1: God bless. I'll get it replaced. Speaker 0: K. Alright. I know you know. Sorry. Once this border guard was hooked, KGB agents could freely cross into the US from Mexico at this station. This information would then be passed on to the GRU so they too could use the access to bring in agents and the Spetsnaz when they were called for. So will Speaker 1: you Call me. Thanks, Tony. Hello? Anyway, anyway, I'll I'll contact you. You know what I mean? I'll call you. I'll call you. I'll call you. Are you okay? Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. Okay. To execute the plan for global chaos and military coups, the secret brotherhood used the g I u to position sleeper agents and devastating weapons around the world. These weapons would stay hidden in strategic places until the day they would be needed. At that time of the Illuminati's choosing, the agents would come out of hiding and the weapons used. Speaker 3: This special operation for These, commanders, are very highly trained, military professionals, and they will come Here when, real tension would be in place, and, they need to have very special weapons system to destroy Very highly protected targets. So they will have nuclear weapons, chemical, biological, other weapon system. Speaker 0: The most frightening weapons to be smuggled in were the small nuclear devices that have become known as the nuclear suitcase bomb. Clear suitcase bomb. These weapons could be moved easily by 1 person but had awesome destructive capabilities. Once they were in the US and other enemy countries, the weapons were hidden in safe places and could be retrieved in time of war. It is estimated There are frightening number of these nuclear devices were positioned in the US and other countries. In all probability, these nuclear devices remain hidden in their secret locations, all ready for use today. Thanks to the newly opened files of the KGB, we've had a shocking look at how the Illuminati has over the years manipulated the world's institutions like the Vatican, and we have seen that devastating weapons have been positioned around the world. We have focused on only Russia's connection to the Illuminati. Since Adam Weishaupt founded the secret organization in 17/76, its tentacles have extended into many other nations around the globe. Even the United States shows telltale sign. The most obvious is on the back of the US $1 bill. Prominently displayed are the Pyramid and the Eye, the Illuminati's insignia put there in 1933 by order of president Franklin d Roosevelt. Underneath are the Latin words, Novus Ordo Seclorum, which translates as new world order. Can the unthinkable plan for Illuminati global domination be stopped? The only thing a secret society fears is being exposed. Today, books on the frightening subject are gaining wide distribution. The Internet is filled with information about the secret organization. We can only hope that the people of all nations around the world will See the signs and heed the clear warning that there are those lurking in the shadows who are planning to take away our freedom. I'm Patrick McNehee. Thanks for joining me.
Saved - February 26, 2024 at 9:33 PM

@Cobratate - Andrew Tate

Tristan Tate Reveals Who Controls the World & the Death of the UK Watch now: https://t.co/PYpudz3Ds9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tristan Tate discusses various topics in an exclusive interview. He criticizes the UK for failing to address basic issues and expresses his belief that success is a form of revenge. He talks about the arrest he faced and promises that the truth will come out once the case is over. Tristan also shares his views on the monarchy and the control of the world, mentioning money and big interests as the driving forces. He reflects on his past as a womanizer but emphasizes that he always treated women with respect. Tristan expresses his surprise at the rise of infamy surrounding him and his brother, Andrew Tate. He mentions that there are secrets he can't share at the moment but promises that the truth will be revealed in due time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tristan Tate said to me he doesn't do interviews as long as Andrew Tate, and I went and got the longest interview on record with Tristan Tate. Speaker 1: Success is a form of revenge. I think it's the only form of revenge that any man should ever care about trying to reach. Speaker 0: In this exclusive episode, Tristan slams the UK. Speaker 1: The UK has just failed. They're not fixing the most basic issues. If I walk down on the street, even with this moderately priced Rolex, and I start walking around, there's a good chance that someone's gonna put a knife through my heart to take my watch. Speaker 0: Tristan gives an exclusive on who's really behind this arrest and that the truth will come out. Speaker 1: As soon as the case is over, the entire world is going to know exactly why this happened. Why did it happen? Who set the dogs on me? And I think everyone's gonna be very, very shocked. Speaker 0: And he talks about the downfall of the monarchy. Speaker 1: I'm not saying what happened to Harry was okay. What I'm saying is to subject your poor grandmother to the accusation of racism in 2022? For me, unforgivable. Speaker 0: So, Tristan, who controls the world? Speaker 1: Oh, obviously. My brother and me. You haven't seen this hand symbol. It's all secret Illuminati stuff. You know? The conspiracy theorists are right. The people who accuse me of being the Illuminati are right. It's all Andrew. Speaker 0: You must have learned being imprisoned and canceled. You must have got further up the chain of who runs the world. Speaker 1: Oh, 1000000%. 1000000%. In fact, going to prison, being canceled, this attack on me has connected me and Andrew politically on a level that we weren't at before. We've made far more important friends, millionaire, billionaire, businessmen, politicians. Lots more people are happy to sit and talk to us, certainly in private, maybe not so much in public these days until my case is over, than ever before. So, yeah. If you were to ask me in a very simple term, you know, Andrew uses the term matrix all the time. What controls the world? Money. Big companies, big interests. They can buy governments. They can buy policy. They can make regulations, which are basically the same as laws. And they can get the people to dance when they want them to dance, stay home when they want them to dance, stay home, clap when they want them to clap. And I think money controls the world. And people Do Speaker 0: you think that's right? Fair? Just? Speaker 1: Yes. I I do, and I don't. I'm not one of the people out there. You know, you have people who have I met man many years ago played in a band. Complete I I guess the word is bum. And he was showing me these documents for a completely new political system he came up with. It wasn't democracy. It wasn't communism. He was like, oh, and this new political system would really take off. And I'm like, bro, you play in a band and you live in Eastern Europe. Like, what universe do you think that this is ever going to even if you're right, even if this is the golden ticket for all of humanity, how do you expect anybody to listen to you when you're sitting there playing in a band all day? So what I do is I try to change the world on more of a micro level. I don't try to change who runs the world, who controls the world, how how the monetary system works, how fair or unfair it is. I tried to look at the game and play the game as best as I understand the rules. So changing on a micro level can be something as little as inspiring young men to get into shape, to care more about their health. You know that, I mean, that should, in theory, lower the cost of health care for every developed nation if everybody listened to my land use advice. And it's the micro level change that I'm more interested in pursuing myself. I'm not trying to run for office. I'm not trying to change the laws. And the world is set up the way it's set up. So I just try and win the game as you have. Get a bunch of money. Put it in your bank. Oh, what's the money worth? What's it backed by? I don't care. I have lots of it. And it can buy real things. It buys real food and real properties and real cars and, you know, real experiences. And it gets you plane tickets and private jets and all the things that you want. So do I really care what it's backed by? You know? It's not an issue that I try to alter, and I never will. Speaker 0: Do you think maybe in some ways whoever controls the world, the governments, the big corporations, they're just running a company? Now you're running a company and I'm running the company. If we were controlling the world, we might run the company in a similar way. I believe I'm a much Speaker 1: I'm a far more moral person than some of the people. So some of the large companies and the people behind them that control the money, I feel like they're happier to flush human lives down the toilet than I ever would be. So when you look at some countries, Saudi Arabia, as example, that's run like a business. And the leaders and the people sit around, they think, okay, we have this many resources, we have this much space. How do we best make our company profitable? How do we make it safe? How do we make everyone inside of it happy? So as with real companies, I've had good bosses and I've had bad bosses. I think the world as a whole is overwhelmingly, unfortunately, controlled by evil money. And I see that with the wars that happen, the people who die every day, the the lockdowns and some of the restrictions they try to put on people, how little they care about the little guy. I would be a far more moral leader. I wouldn't send young men to die in a pointless war. I wouldn't finance wars, try to start them for profit, benefit, nothing. If I could end all war and be financially broke myself, there's a button right here I could press. Good. I'll live on the streets for the rest of my life. Whereas this clearly isn't the attitude of some of the people at the top. They're happy to enrich themselves, enrich their families. And who goes to die? The poor people. Poor people go and die. And, of course, now I have some money. But I am essentially a poor person with lots of money. I'm a working class guy. I come from a council estate. It's me and my people who have to march off to their wars and go and fight and die. I said this the other day. I was naming the number of children certain UK politicians have, numbers of sons. I can't remember the exact names of the exact kids. I Googled them on the spot. I don't know off the top of my head. But it was like, you know, this minister, that minister, this member of parliament all have sons aged 17 to 25. And I said, well, unless their sons are going with me, I wouldn't go. You know, because go fight your own bloody wars. If it's so important, if it's so important, like, you harp on about it in the news all the time or stand in the House of Parliament and lecture people about the importance of these military operations, good. Send your own kids. But they never do. I think during the I know the statistic. During the entire US intervention in Iraq of 400 of 545 sitting members of congress, only one had a child who was in the services, who even stepped foot in the country of Iraq, which is terrifying. So I think that leaders should lead their own soldiers into battle. I'm too moral. I don't want to run the world the way that everyone else runs it. Speaker 0: Do you think because I think about this a lot because the reason I want to know who runs the world is because I am in the world and therefore, their decisions affect me. And I agree with you, the best thing you can do to rebal is to get really rich and build your own infrastructure and ecosystem of which you are the leader of. But still, those powerful people, whoever they are, make decisions which could ruin my life tomorrow. So I feel like I owe it to myself to figure out where it goes and what got them there if I want to create change. And sometimes I think there's just some fucking evil people and their family lineage of 1000 of years were evil people. Yes. And then other times, like politics, I think some people go in with good intent and then power corrupts. And for them to fit within the system, it changes them. Have you got any thoughts? Speaker 1: Yes. Well, it's not just power that corrupts. I think it's actually a lack of understanding of the system. So if we take the American Republican primaries, for example, a lot of people were were harping on about Vivek Ramaswamy, who I don't dislike. I like him. I like him. But the reason I was, Trump should be president guy, not Vivek, is because Trump is now prepared for the enemy he's facing. He was put into office. He thought, I'm the president. I can do what I want to help the country. And he found himself remember Russia rigged the election. He was fighting this in court for three and a half years. And it's like, oh, well, okay. It turns out Russia didn't need election. Oh, time's up. And then he was out. I feel like Vivek could have been blindsided with some nonsense claim. I mean, he's of for example, he's of Indian heritage. Okay? He becomes president. Maybe India interfered with the election. He'd be sitting there for 3 years, three and a half years fighting this imaginary case, not getting what he needs to do done. And then it's all right. Time's up, Vivek. Get out. So the reason I was a pro Trump guy is because it's not just about power corrupting people. I think people who get into power maybe don't realize how little power they have in the position that they're fighting for. Whereas Trump now knows the rules. He knows who he's up against. He knows who in the deep state is trying to take him down. So I think he's the most qualified man for the job. So I don't think anyone necessarily gets corrupted. I think that the suits knock on the door and sit down and say, oh, congratulations, prime minister. Well, this is the way it works. And if you don't like it, shut up. That's what I think. Speaker 0: Yeah. So it's interesting you talk about the the guy in a band who had a new model of the political system. Speaker 1: No, it was terrible, by the way. I looked it over. Right. Speaker 0: But the political system surely is broken. It's not a democracy. It's not of the people, for the people. So and does it not take a naive delusional human to Speaker 1: change? Yes. It's not by the it's not of the people for the people. It's of the money for the money. And that's the way it works in, I think, most political systems. Most democracies, it's it's all about the money. And I don't think countries like our country, your British, of course, really have a chance of any radical change. I really see it, and I see that both parties are center. 1 center right, 1 center left. They're basically the same. They they, argue about tiny little minor differences in and of themselves. But I think money controls both parties. And in the United States and some other countries in the world, you can have a maverick who comes along with a new idea, a new way of doing things, a new way of saying things, and he can be swept in the off into office from from relative obscurity. Then he chooses the other people in charge. Systems like England are the scariest because, for all those watching who don't know this, the way that the UK elections work is there's hundreds of mini elections for each member of parliament. And then the party that wins the most seats in parliament gets the former government, and then they select their prime minister from the people who are sitting in the house. So nobody can come along. Nobody. Not anybody. And just say, I've got a new way of doing things. Please vote for me. Vote for me where? Coventry South? Luton North? Then you're a member of parliament. You have no power. You're not directing the government. They don't got a form of government from you. So I look at, you know, what people like Laurence Fox are doing with the Reform Party and stuff. And I'm just thinking, I'd love I'd love not because I necessarily adore what the Reform Party stand for, but but I want new faces in our government, and I want new people sitting in those chairs. And I'd love the Reform Party to even find enough people to run-in every single little local election in the first pass to post system to absolutely sweep the numbers, get 200 people sitting in the House of the Parliament, and at least then we have a new way of doing things. But it can't happen if Lawrence Fox or any of these people running for the Reclaimed Party, the Reform Party, sorry, Even get their single seat, it's going to be Labour or Conservative who form the government, who have their prime minister. And there hasn't been a revolution in British politics since the, I guess, the invention of the Labour Party when they first came around. So it's scary and it's sad. And I don't think there's any way of fixing some countries. And England is most broken, to answer your question about is it broken. It's more broken in places like England than it is in the United States. Speaker 0: Yes. That's scary because the paradox that comes to mind is it's broken, it's been broken for so long, there's nothing you can do about it, sort yourself out. Yeah. If we don't stand up and fight against it, it will never change. So we manifest the lack of change. Speaker 1: It's a self fulfilling prophecy. Absolutely. But there's nobody who I've seen, even from people who I like, like Nigel Farage, who can actually garner that kind of numbers behind them to get started. I think he Speaker 0: can now. Speaker 1: Do you Speaker 0: think he can? I mean, I know him really well. He's been on the show a few times. Speaker 1: I Speaker 0: think he's awesome. He's powerful. I think he's He's more powerful than Ricci now. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I hope so. And Nigel was awesome. So what does he do? Does he rejoin the Conservative Party and try to fight his position within the party to get himself to the prime minister position? That is the best, I think, course of action for for mister Farage because forming a new party I mean, UKIP was had it was a one policy party, and that now is is finished and well done to him. But forming a new party and trying to get 200, 300 people to all win seats, I I just don't think it's possible. So I'd like to see someone who can garner the kind of numbers to win a sweeping general election. And I personally, I don't think Nigel Farage could do it. I think his only way in is through the conservatives, which is sad because he's, he cares about England. He really cares about England and he's a really good guy. In my opinion, Alan, you know him, I don't. Speaker 0: I'd agree. So we have another paradox that exists and that's one about money because you've essentially said that money corrupts but you're rich as and you love money. So Speaker 1: I am rich as you. But you're not doing too bad yourself either, are you, Robert? No. Speaker 0: I'm doing all right. Wonderful. Wonderful. So how do you exist in that paradox? How do you not let let it corrupt to you? Speaker 1: You know, it's a very I don't think money or power corrupt moral people. I think they they they bring out more of who you really are, you know? I didn't run a charity when I was 21 because I had no money. Now I do because I have money. I did my mom still worked her job when I was 21. Now she doesn't because I have money. The even the people who follow me around I just had lunch now. I tip a 100% at every restaurant I go to because I have money. I'm a kind person, and money allows you to do more of the things that you enjoy. So if you meet someone who seems like a good down to earth guy who then wins the lottery and he starts talking down to people and being dismissive and being rude to waiters. I don't think he's been corrupted. I think that's who he really was. But you can't act that way in a position of poverty. I feel like it reveals your true character. So how do you stop money from corrupting people? I guess the answer is you don't. You have good people and bad people. And I wish the world was set up in a way that it was easier for the good people to get rich. You know, rather than, you know, the evil, cutthroat, vindictive people. Because capitalism is a system where it's easier if you're cutthroat to get rich. System where it's easier if you're cutthroat to get rich than if you're kind and moral, I think. Speaker 0: Yeah. I'd agree. Although, do you think we even have capitalism anymore? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's tricky. I mean, capitalism is a system for capitalism to be real, money has to be real. Money has to be backed by something other than a military that's willing to invade every single country, say no names and overthrow their leaders when they don't like using their currency. So for capitalism to be real, money has to be real. Personal ownership of wealth has to be real. What does your bank balance even mean? Nothing. Is it backed by gold or silver or anything? No. I mean, the only way to actually have wealth is to accumulate things that are expensive. So I mean, if you own a bunch of properties, a bunch of cars, a bunch of gold, then you do have some wealth. But capitalism means that every single intermediary exchange between goods and services is all cyberspace, smoke and mirrors, nothing. So I guess in a way, we don't have capitalism. But I don't know what to do about that besides keep making as much of this money as I can and keep buying real things. Speaker 0: So, well, it sounds like you do because that sound you said that flippantly but I think it was wise. You use the system of capitalism and this thing that isn't real money and then you convert it into real assets that is real money. Well, yes. And that's exactly Speaker 1: what the evil people do as well. That's what evil people do as well. If you're a bank and you can print money out of thin air Speaker 0: What banks do is take everyone's money and convert it to assets. Speaker 1: Assets. Exactly. Exactly. Or they take everyone's assets. So a bank will, as you know, well, the viewers at home may not know, the bank will say, I am the bank and I offer a mortgage to everyone in this studio right now. Ten people. Ten mortgages. You all bought your homes. You know what your job is. You know what your salaries are. And you're all paying me a certain amount of money back on these loans I gave you. Okay. Cool. Well, interest rates go go up. You've got some variable interest rates on your mortgages. Then suddenly, I personally crash the the the property market and the value of all your houses go down. And I start saying, oh, well, your loans are too big blah blah. I'm gonna default you on all these loans. I'm gonna take all your houses. What's happened? A bunch of money has moved around, which doesn't mean anything, and I have 10 houses. Your houses. And you're all homeless. Speaker 0: And they didn't have to earn them. Money didn't create Exactly. They've ripped Speaker 1: it out of thin air for you to work and do the labor to get these houses. Now they're all mine. None of you have houses. The whole street is mine. So evil people do it. Evil people do it. Absolutely. They, they don't even need to do any work or come up with any good ideas to get everyone's assets, farmland. It's all it's all going into the hands of these people. Mhmm. And it's it's a scary future to look to look into. Mhmm. Speaker 0: Huge news, years in the making. My brand new book that my publishers refused to publish, Money Matrix. Beat the money system and build generational wealth. Understand the three main ways that the banks productize you and make money from you. You'll be able to turn that system against itself, build generational wealth on multiple streams of recurring income. It's all at moneymatrix.cash. And if you're quick, the first few 100 registrants and buyers will receive many special bonuses from me, the brand new Money Maker Summit 3 day special event. Meet me at a champagne reception. Meet me at a multimillionaire networking dinner. Go now, money matrix.cash. This is huge. So part of my mission, because my mission is to help as many people on the planet get better financial knowledge, is to learn what the system does. Because actually, take morality out of it, it's pretty fucking smart. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. No. It is. It is genius. I mean, Speaker 0: if I could sell you a money printer that you could have in your office where you could just print money, Speaker 1: you wouldn't tell me fuck off, Speaker 0: would you? Speaker 1: No, no, no. Absolutely. I'd buy it at whatever cost. I'd buy it for all that I have because then I'm rich forever. Speaker 0: Yes. So I guess I'm trying to help people understand the challenge for people is the system is really smart and it makes money out of you, but it doesn't want you to know how it makes money out of you because once it's exposed, you can reject it and make your own money like it makes money from you. Speaker 1: Exactly. And also, where do you get your education from? Speaker 0: The system is so propaganda. Speaker 1: That's the tricky part. I mean, people joke about this all the time. Like, you in school, I'm not against learning any of the stuff we learn in school. Pythagorean theorem, very useful if you wanna be, even a a carpenter. Very useful stuff. How flowers work, I still remember that to this day. It's very interesting. People should know about the world around them and people should learn these things. But what is money? How do loans work? How would a mortgage work? Like, very basic stuff. I remember taking a class called life skills. Now, I went to British school. It was called life skills back in my day. And what the hell did we learn in life skills? The fact that I don't remember, I think, speaks volumes. It speaks more than if I could give you an example. So, yeah, it's very scary that the system is in charge of your education and people don't seem to be learning the most basic things about how any of this works. Speaker 0: And the paradox of that is people like yourself and Andrew who are teaching this stuff are starting to become very powerful. Speaker 1: Yes. Indeed, we are powerful and also in jail. So Right. Yeah. Interesting how that works. You know, I can't say too much on the topic, but it's very interesting when you start upsetting the people who've been running this scam for 100 of years, and upsetting the system, I guess, that we're all a part of, that out of nowhere, I mean, I mean, Elon Musk just got hit with a bunch of criminal charges. They're trying to put Donald Trump in jail. I was in jail. There probably even won't be a trial, but they certainly screwed with me for a couple of years. It's it's a it's a back off warning, I guess. It's a do not touch. And I don't know what else to do besides continue doing what I'm doing because, you know, the success stories of people who, you know, subscribe to the the online school that we run or or read your books, the success stories keep you going. It's like, okay. This young man's now making money because of something I've taught him. Screw it. Send me to jail. Like, what else can I do? I can't quit. Speaker 0: So do you think you were in jail because of things you did? Or were you in jail because of the crossfire from Andrew? Speaker 1: It's tricky. I mean, when you try to use people's pasts against them, everyone knows my past. I've talked about it very openly on the internet. I mean, I used to run a webcam studio. I used to be a serial womanizer. So there's lots of women in my past. So it's a very easy attack vector. Let's throw him in jail and talk to all his exes. Luckily, I've always been a gentleman. None of my exes said anything bad about me. 0 girls who ever worked at my studios are involved in the current case, by the way. People on the Twitter keep trying to make that connection. Oh, he said he ran webcam studios. Excuse me. There are tens of thousands of OnlyFans management agencies in this world now. Who controls them? Arrest all them for human trafficking. The point is it's not illegal. Immoral? Sure. Good for society? Probably not. But it's a completely legal business. And that's not connected with my case at all. What they're trying to do is talk to all my exes and say, I know, has he ever hurt you? Luckily, I've always been a good guy. So I looked like I was easy to attack. The case hasn't really formulated the way they wanted because my past was much cleaner than they thought. Never tried any drugs. Never did anything illegal. So, it's hard to say whose fault it was that I was in jail. The way I lived didn't contribute to me looking like a saint. But I also do believe if Andrew had not got so big or so popular, this wouldn't have happened. It wouldn't have happened. It wouldn't have been worth anyone's time. If Andrew had never become so wealthy and so popular and so listened to, it would not have been worth anyone's time to be calling 200 of my ex girlfriends. It doesn't make any sense. Why do that? For what? You're not gonna get money out of it. You're not gonna get headlines out of it. You're not gonna look like a hero. I'm just Joe Schmo. So I guess it's both of our fault. It's both of our fault and we were in jail together and that's the way I like it. So it's fine by me. Speaker 0: So we'll come back to that in a minute, but I just want to pull out something you said which is really interesting. You said a womanizer and a gentleman. Yes. So when you said you were a womanizer, but you're a gentleman, to me a womanizer isn't a gentleman. So what's a womanizer? Speaker 1: So I'm talking about look, I come from a very bad part of England. You know where I come from. Of states are not allowed to. Speaker 0: For me. Yeah. Speaker 1: No. Fair enough. Well, they're not they're it's not a good area. And I made money, very slowly, I guess. And I've experienced all the different wealth brackets on the way up. And, you know, you give a young man in his mid 20s, or I think I was just past my mid 20s when I first became a millionaire. I'm driving around in a Lamborghini. I'm living in, 1st London, in Slovakia, then Romania. There's lots of pretty girls around. Of course, of course, I met loads of women. Of course, I met loads of women. That's what you get. It's like giving a chimpanzee a machine gun. Like, of course, that's what I was going to do. I live a very different lifestyle now, but that's that's what what could I have done? I'd like I look back on it like, oh, I shouldn't have acted that way, but no one at the time could have told me. Even my future self couldn't go back in time at 26 and said, Tristan, it's it's Saturday night. Don't go to the club and don't meet any women. I wouldn't have listened. I wouldn't have listened. So, when I say a womanizer and a gentleman, what I mean is, you know, I met a lot of women, dated a lot of women, took a lot of women to bed, but I never mistreated any woman. So, you know, pick them up in your car, take them out to dinner, buy them flowers, take them home, do this 2 or 3 times, you know, and the relationship kind of fades into nothing and so on to the next one. So but those women, when contacted by the authorities, had nothing bad to say about me. Nothing certainly nothing illegal I ever did. They didn't even want to lie for the intention of trying to extort me. Everyone they called said I was a nice guy. So, yeah, I was a womanizer and a gentleman. Never mistreat anybody. Mhmm. Broke a few hearts, but I had mine broken a couple times along the way too. Speaker 0: So Is that not all? Speaker 1: It's it's life is called. Exactly. Exactly. No matter what you do that's what happens yeah Speaker 0: so how does a woman keep a man like Tristan Tate Speaker 1: that's incredibly tricky. I didn't actually expect these kinds of questions. How does a woman keep a man like Tristan Tate? You know, I I'm going to cop out and give a really crappy answer to this, And you're not gonna be entertained by it. I don't believe I could describe my perfect woman. Because when I look at all of my exes and the women who I was in love with and the women who I did have serious relationships with, relationships with, they never fit one exact type, whether it be in looks or personality or the, you know, the their charms or jobs, education levels. There was no real correlation I can draw. It was just a feeling I got from them. You don't have to be my type to be my type. I can describe the physically perfect woman if if I like. I mean, I like tall, kinda slim model types, but, you know, not all of my exes fit into that. And it's not just about looks. I think they just gave me something, a really good feeling I had around them. They they they bought me peace. They didn't fight with me. They didn't argue with me. They didn't make scandals or blow my phone up or cause arguments over stupid little things. Like, I'm a businessman and you understand what that's like. I'm at war all the time, 247. I'm operating at 99% stress level, you know, 365 days a year. So if you want to add 1% stress to my life each day, that's just not doable. No one can operate at a 100% stress level. Nobody can. And people I guess my exes and and the girls who I who I really liked just were very, very nice. Very nice, very kind, very kind of emotionally giving people. I think that's how you keep a man like me. Speaker 0: Do you think you will ever settle down? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think I will. I look at the trajectory of my life. And will I be married in the next couple of years? Who knows? Prenup, obviously. Jesus Christ. But, but, yeah, it's certainly going that direction. I feel like as a man who's lived this kind of strange, eclectic life, you go through these phases, and you get bored of certain things. Now there's nothing I wanna do less than go out 7 days a week and meet 3 new women in those 7 days. Like, Jesus. Really? All the drinks, all the hangovers, I can't be bothered with that. So I Speaker 0: have been told by people we both mutually know you still like a good drink. Oh, I Speaker 1: do like a good drink. I love a good drink, but it's very different now. Now it's like I'm sitting around with my friends. Let's drink 6 bottles of whiskey. It's not like, let's Speaker 0: go on. Speaker 1: Well, it depends. If there's 3 of us, it's only 2 bottles per bed, you know? It's not that bad. So yeah, I still do love a drink, and I built up a tolerance over the years. But it's not part of my recreation in terms of going out and making the kind of parties. It's more sitting around discussing history and politics with my friends, playing chess, playing cards, drinking whiskey. That's when I like a drink now. So it's shifted. And I'm bored of the previous stages of my life. You know? I'm literally bored of them. So settling down, I think, will probably happen. Yeah. Sooner rather than later, but I I can't really say anymore because I have no certain answers. Speaker 0: Do you think, like, being with 100 of women comes from a place of loads of workers? Speaker 1: Thousands of women. Speaker 0: Sorry. I can't edit it. Tristan, do you think being with tens of millions Speaker 1: of women, Speaker 0: do you think it's sometimes trying to fill a void in your own soul or fill up some emptiness that's there? Speaker 1: I've heard that before, and the answer is yes in some people. Yes. In some people. So when I say I like drinking alcohol, my friends, because it enhances our conversations about history and politics and makes the card games more fun, Also, there are people who use alcohol to fill a hole in their soul. I don't have a hole in my soul. So when I was running around meeting a bunch of beautiful women, I come from a time when I was a nightclub bodyguard in London, one of the doormen. And I'd, like, see these millionaires with all these beautiful girls, and I couldn't talk to them. 1, I was at work. 2, like, I made £100 a day. They probably this kind of girl probably wasn't interested in hanging out with me. So it didn't come from a a point of trying to fill my soul with anything. I just enjoyed doing it. I just enjoyed meeting new women. I enjoyed hanging out with them. It wasn't just the sexual side of things. I enjoyed taking them to dinner, having them on my arm, going to the theater, going to the ballet. It was nice. I wasn't trying to fill a hole in my soul, but I do 100% agree that some people are trying to do that. But same could be said with alcohol. Some same could be said with many things. Speaker 0: Did I hear you say you were glad you went to jail? Speaker 1: Did I say that? Yeah. I probably said that. Speaker 0: So when I say did, I I know you did because I saw it. Yeah. You did. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I think I've said it twice. 1, I'm glad I went to jail with Andrew. I'm glad he wasn't sent to jail without me because that would have been a travesty. It's it's already a travesty of justice as it is, but at least send me with him. You know? Glad I went to jail. Yes. Yes. I'd never been to jail. And I tried to think into the future and look back at my life as a 65, 70 year old man. Although being in jail at the time bothered me a lot, even now that I'm out, God knows it'll send me back. Hopefully not. It doesn't look like it. But it I think it was a very interesting chapter of my life. This is certainly, for a 3 month period, one of the foundational stories that will be told about me and Andrew in the decades to come, The time that we were thrown in prison unjustly. So even though it was only 3 months of of time, yeah, I'm glad I went. It was a test of character. I passed the test of character to myself and to God, to no one else because obviously no one else was watching. And, yeah, I think one day when I, when I write my autobiography, it's going to be very interesting 3 or 4 chapters. So I'm glad I went through it. I mean, it was January, February, March of 2023. What would I have done anyway? Went skiing? I can't ski. I just sit in the ski resort drinking whiskey, trying to get a water. What else did the skiing and sit by the fireplace? What would I really done that could have taught me more than going to jail? Speaker 0: So what were the benefits of going to jail? Speaker 1: Oh, I mean, there were basically no benefits in that regard. Speaker 0: Well, there weren't any luxurious benefits, but there were counter benefits. Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. It didn't change me, but it confirmed to me all the things I already thought about myself. Now I know them about myself. Speaker 0: So Well, surely, going from thinking about yourself to knowing yourself is powerful. It is. Speaker 1: It absolutely is. You know, I'm I'm kind of guy, and I feel like I can handle any situation. I can handle anything I'm first in taking. I've been saying this for years, and I've been through some difficult situations in my life. But being picked up from just after Christmas Day and your fancy clothes and you're taken down to a police station, they're like, oh, we're searching your house for human trafficking. I'm like, well, good. There's no one in my house. There's no drugs in my house. Nothing. They searched my house. It was okay. Then the handcuffs went on. They put me in jail. And they said, okay. You'll be here at least 24 hours. And that went on for 92 days. So it was a mentally tough situation to be in. And yeah, I thought I'm Tristan Tate. I can handle any situation. Now I'm like, yeah, I can handle any situation. So having thoughts about who I was and confirming who I was, I guess, is the biggest thing I got out of it. Speaker 0: So I talked quite a lot to Andrew leading up to this. Speaker 1: And one Speaker 0: thing he said to me was, I'm pissed off with myself, Rob, because there's things I really want to say that I haven't said and lawyers, whatever reasons. Is there anything about the case that you haven't said, that you can say? Speaker 1: Is there anything I haven't said that I can say? No. There's things I haven't said that I'd really love to say. I'd really love to say, no. I I can't I can't put them out right now. Speaker 0: I will frustrate you. Speaker 1: A little bit. Yeah. But I know that my time is gonna come. And one day, everybody, whether they find me guilty on 0 evidence and put me in jail or not, as soon as the case is over, the entire world is going to know exactly why this happened. Why did it happen? Who set the dogs on me? What the dogs' names were? Like, let's just put it that way. Speaker 0: So you know the dogs' names? Speaker 1: And and the and the and the handler who let them off the off the chain. Speaker 0: Right. I can't And that's what you can't say? Speaker 1: Well, it's one of the things I can't say. I can't I can't I literally wish I could say it, and I can't I can't say anything right now. But when the case is over, I won't even have to say anything. Everyone everything is gonna be on the table, and everybody will be able to look. And I think everyone's gonna be very, very shocked at the process that's led me here. I mean, I was falsely accused originally 1 year 9 months ago, 1 year 9 months. I was arrested 1 year and 1 month ago. I'm still under a form of arrest now. I'm still under arrest now. And, yeah, the fact that this has lasted so long is the big mystery. That's the big mystery. Everyone's like, well, the people who like me are quite right in saying, if he was guilty of human trafficking, they'd locked him up and convicted him and put him in jail by now. Because that's what the people who attacked me wanted to do. And the people who hate me are actually wrong in saying, oh, well, it's still going on because they're going to find him guilty eventually. No one is ever, what, 2 years from the initial event, still there's not even a decision about if there will be a trial or not. That decision hasn't been made. So it's a very long time in my life. And the reason why it took so long is going to be the big wow moment. Speaker 0: Well, so because I was just gonna ask you, is it taking so long part of the process of what they want Speaker 1: to achieve? That's yeah. Exactly. And how they've done it is gonna be the mind blowing part when everyone's like, oh, wow. Speaker 0: Can I come back can I come back to Romania for that moment? Yeah. Sure. Have another chat with you? Speaker 1: I've been in Romania a while. When this is over, let's meet in Dubai. Yes. I'll know that. I'll I'll come to you. Speaker 0: You know? Speaker 1: Yeah. But that's going to be the mind blowing moment, how it was done, how it was orchestrated to last so long and who did it. That's gonna be the interesting part of that. Speaker 0: That is the, like, filthiest of cliffhangers. Yeah. Too bad. Yeah. Yes. And I wouldn't push any harder than that. I've got to push a bit. I've got to do my job. I appreciate it. Yes. I appreciate it. Does anything shock you about your rise to Infamy? Speaker 1: I would actually correct your question because we are infamous, 100%. But we're also heroes to a lot, a massive percentage of a generation. So we are infamous, but we're also very, very well liked. Depends who you're asking. But, in terms of the state hating me, etcetera, like the old pirates were, you know, we are infamous in that way. Yeah. I'm I'm very surprised at how evil they've painted, I guess, my brother, me by extension. I like to think of myself as a very good person. And my brother, again, is a very good person, a very moral person, a very kind person, a very charitable person, a very a person who's always willing to help, who's always to lift, always willing to lift others up, always willing to, you know, take my time to, you know, teach people lessons in life that may benefit them. And I've always seen myself and my brother this way. So when I look at the old videos of him like, yeah. You know, if a girl attacked me with a machete, I just I keyed her the machete out of her hand and and I look at the stupid old videos, and they're like, Andrew Tate attacks women with machetes. I'm like, how first of all, how dishonest is this? First of all, how dishonest is this to find one clip from people who've been producing content on the Internet now 11 years and say that this is the core of his message, attack people with machetes. He was talking about self defense. It was a joke. It's stupid. But that's the core of his message. It's the rise to infamy hasn't surprised me from the moment I realized how dishonest the mainstream media are. Once I saw how dishonest they could be about him, now I'm like, okay. Say whatever you like about me. I don't know. Human trafficker, murderer, misogynist. I you can say whatever you like about me now, and I will not be shocked. I will not be surprised because I know how evil they are and how dishonest they really are. Because the core of Andrew's message, and you're obviously someone who knows this, I'd like to think, is be better, do better, treat others well, you know, go to the mosque. That's Andrew's message. I'm not I'm not Muslim myself, but that's the core of Andrew's message. So he's not an evil person. The rise to infamy has been a shock, an absolute shock because I was like, why on earth would they want to lie about someone so obviously and so blatantly but also in such a horrible way? You know? I don't it doesn't affect me. It doesn't affect Andrew. But, you know, our mother, We don't need that. People keep thinking that her sons are arch criminals who kidnap people and stab people with machetes. Like, especially at a time when in the UK, every single day, someone is in fact stabbed with a machete and these people are unnamed. But Andrew's joke from 10 years ago was the height of machete madness. It's very strange. Speaker 0: But you know why now. Speaker 1: Oh, now I know why. Yeah. Of course, I know. Yeah. Very obvious. Speaker 0: Yeah. Wow. What's the story you've never told or a secret you've never shared? Speaker 1: A story I've never told or secret I've never shared. I'm a very open person. I don't really have I know it sounds like I'm being defensive. I don't really have any, any stories I wouldn't tell or any secrets I wouldn't share. I'm not So maybe Speaker 0: you just haven't had the opportunity. I think we've got one from Andrew. There must be something in your life that's just not come out yet or something you believe you don't talk about much maybe because of the types of interviews you do. And if you did a different type of interview, you might we might get to know something about you. Speaker 1: That's a tricky question. That's a tricky question. I can tell you things about me that people think that aren't accurate, and I'm more and I I haven't had a chance to clear them up. I mean, I can name a few things. Speaker 0: Safe. Speaker 1: People always assume that me and Andrew I don't know why. They group us in with this online community of what they call red pillars. And they believe that I hate women and I look down on women. That that is actually one of the most offensive things that anyone can say about me when, really, I don't hate any woman. I don't care if a woman is a actress or if a woman is a prostitute or if a woman is a virgin or a nun. I don't hate any of them. And the fact that you can say that I do means that you listen to nothing that I say. Obviously, don't marry your p star, but p stars exist because they fulfill a role in society. Don't marry your stupid suits exist because they serve a role in society. I'm I'm actually tired of the red pill community who they're always trying to group me in with trying to change women. They get a bunch of girls who are promiscuous on a panel and they say, Yeah, you should act like wives and you should No, they shouldn't. No, no, no. Marry the wives. The wives aren't sitting on your podcasts. Let them do their thing and stop hating on everybody. Stop being so rude towards women. So I think the fact that I I appreciate women and don't hate them is one of the most annoying rumors about me that I never ever get the chance to clear up. But, well, there it is. That that really offends me when people say that I hate women. Speaker 0: Well, hopefully, this clears it up. Speaker 1: I will see. I don't know. But stories about me, secrets about me, I don't have any secrets. I don't have any secrets. I've got loads and loads of cool stories because every man has cool stories. And I've got I've got hundreds of cool stories. But, you know, I don't know what to do. Coolest story? My coolest story. Watch the full episode now on Rumble.
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 1:45 PM

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

DECODING DAVOS: THE GLOBAL ENDGAME New Documentary 2023 I believe we are rapidly gaining ground in this war. But for everyone to participate and operate properly, you must understand the enemy. Let get knee deep into the mud of the WEF and its Satanic leader Klaus Schwab. https://t.co/EpdS3xI6wl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the Davos class and their agenda for global control. They use events like the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change to push their plans for a one-world government and stakeholder capitalism. The Davos class includes powerful individuals and organizations who want to reshape the world and control every aspect of human life. They promote public-private partnerships and collectivism to achieve their goals. The video warns against trusting these elites and emphasizes the importance of resisting their agenda. The ultimate aim is to create a global surveillance state and merge humans with machines. The video urges viewers to be aware and take action to protect their freedom and independence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1984 is, I believe, a quite terrifying masterpiece. So terrifying, in fact, I don't think I should like to read another like it. Speaker 1: I think that allowing for the book being after all a parody, something like 1984 could actually happen. This is the direction the world is going in at the present time. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. Speaker 2: George Orwell's chilling line about a boot stomping on your face forever is very close to its ultimate fulfillment. You see, the people who boldly announce that by 2030, you'll own nothing and be happy and that you'll merely rent whatever you need met during the week of January 25, 2021. To discuss plans for a total reshaping of the planet. That's right. I'm talking about the World Economic Forum, also known as the Davos class. The conference kicked off with remarks from Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, who claimed 2021 is a pivotal and crucial year for our future. Speaker 3: We are here together in 2021, which I consider a pivotal year, a crucial year for our future. We have the chance to move out with vaccines of the hot face of the COVID crisis and to rebuild our economies, but we have to do so in a way that our economy and our society will be more resilient, more inclusive and more sustainable. Speaker 2: The week long conference was attended by representatives from government, banking, business, academia, media, big tech, and big pharma. Some of the more notable speakers included doctor Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Tedros Adhanam Ghebreyesus, Krystalina Georgieva, Al Gore, John Kerry, Christine Lagarde, Angela Merkel, Sundar Pichai, and Rajeev Shah. There were also special addresses delivered by Antonio Gutierrez, Emmanuel Macron, Benjamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Ursula von der Leyen, and Xi Jinping. Speaker 4: Public health emergencies like COVID nineteen may very well recur, And global public health governance needs to be enhanced. The Earth is our one and only home. To scale up efforts, address climate change, and promote sustainable development bears on the future of humanity. No global problem can be solved by any one country alone. There must be global action, global response, and global cooperation. Speaker 2: The 7 main themes of this year's Davos meeting were how to save the planet, fairer economies, tech for good, society and future of work, better business, healthy futures, and beyond geopolitics. Sounds good. Right? Well, if you would like everything in your life decided by a cabal of rich, self congratulating, well connected insiders, then I'm sure it sounds wonderful. For the rest of us who value independence, freedom, and privacy, Davos' goal of saving the planet and transforming society sound more like authoritarian battle cries, the likes of which even George Orwell would be horrified by? Davos' front man, Klaus Schwab, has openly stated that the COVID 19 pandemic was the perfect opportunity to reimagine our world and even wrote an entire book about how to do it. In fact, Schwab proudly proclaimed the world would never go back to normal after the pandemic as if this was an awful thing. Speaker 3: So people assume, we are just going back, to the good old world which we had, and everything will be normal again in how we are used to normal in the old fashion. This is, let's say, fiction. It will not happen. See see, cut, which we have now, is much too strong, in order not to leave traces. Speaker 2: In his book, Schwab doubled down on his stance of not returning to normal. Predictably, Schwab wasn't the only one who felt this way. He was joined by many government and business leaders who eerily began echoing almost the exact same statements in the media. Speaker 5: I want to be straight with you. There will be no return to the old normal for the foreseeable future. I repeat, there will be no return to the old normal for the foreseeable future. Speaker 6: If you're talking about getting back to a degree of normality, which resembles where we were prior to COVID, it's gonna be well into 2021, maybe even towards the end of 2021. Speaker 7: Realistically, COVID 19 will be here for the next 18 months or more. We will not be able to return to normalcy until we find a vaccine or effective medications. I know that's dreadful news to hear. How are people supposed to find work if this goes on in some form for a year and a half? All that economic pain worth trying to stop COVID nineteen. The truth is we have no choice. We cannot return to normal until there's a vaccine. Speaker 2: It was Schwab's World Economic Forum, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security that sponsored event 201 back in October 2019. This pandemic preparedness exercise presented an almost carbon copy of what would take place in real life just a few months later. Speaker 0: It began in healthy looking pigs months, perhaps years ago. A new coronavirus spread silently within herds. Gradually, farmers started getting sick. Infected people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu like signs to severe pneumonia. The sickest required intensive care. Many died. At first, the spread was limited to those with close contacts, health care personnel, coworkers, and families, but now it's spreading rapidly throughout local communities. Speaker 8: Without a question, epidemic risk has become a global strategic concern. I don't think we've ever been in a situation where we have had to respond to so many health emergencies at once. This is a new normal. The scenario you will be presented with this morning could easily become 1 shared reality, one day. I fully expect that we will be confronted by a fast moving, highly lethal pandemic of respiratory pathogen. Question is, are we prepared to globally respond to the next major pandemic event? Speaker 2: The Speaker 9: question of the Pandemic Emergency Board is to provide recommendations to deal with the major global challenges arising in response to an response to an unfolding pandemic. The Board is comprised of highly experienced leaders from business, public health and civil society. Speaker 10: We could be Speaker 11: looking at double the number of cases in 1 week and 16 times as many in a month if we are not able Speaker 12: to stop the spread. Speaker 11: That would be on the order of half a 1000000 cases, and it would continue to rise exponentially. In 3 months, we could be approaching 10,000,000 cases. Speaker 13: We're at the start of what's looking like it will be a severe pandemic, and there are problems emerging that can only be solved by global business and governments working together. Speaker 2: We'll leave the subject of the virus's true origins and nature for another time. But as the panel of experts predicted, everything did change and very quickly once the World Health Organization declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The very same day, the World Economic Forum announced the creation of its COVID Action Platform, serving as a blueprint for reshaping global economic response to the coronavirus pandemic. Speaker 14: This is why we are launching the COVID action platform, a unique coalition that will address the crisis in 3 main ways. First, activate the global business community for collective action by improving coordination between them and sharing insights and best practices. 2nd, protect everyone's livelihood and ensure business continuity by sharing the latest tools to assess risks, maintain operations, and protect employees. Finally, engage business for the COVID nineteen response by strengthening the supply chains for medical equipments and funding the development of vaccines, treatments, and cures. There are many ways you can contribute and join the COVID action platform. Speaker 2: Also released was the strategic intelligence platform developed to explore and monitor the issues and forces driving transformational change across economies, industries, and global issues. In other words, seizing control of everything vital to life on the planet and its population. With these efforts and more, the Davos class wasted no time with his plans to reshape the world. As former Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel and brother to doctor no return to normal, Zeke Emanuel, once stated. Speaker 15: You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that, it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before. Speaker 2: But the real issue has always been about advancing an agenda to create a global government. The pandemic was the excuse used to accelerate this scheme. And, oh, what a scheme it is. But let's once again let globalist steward Klaus Schwab set the stage for the real mechanism that will be used to bring forth all the desired changes of the Davos class, fear. Again, it was Schwab who recognized that the spread of infectious diseases has a unique ability to fuel fear, anxiety, and mass hysteria. Indeed, the fear induced hysteria from a public health crisis caused the exact scenarios event 201 had gained out just months earlier. COVID 19 served as a wrecking ball, unleashed to upend every facet of life. This worldwide social engineering experiment proved largely successful, as societies worldwide were transformed in a couple of months into totalitarian regimes demanding compliance with draconian measures enacted to stop the virus from spreading. Speaker 16: In an unprecedented way, we see all of the governments around the world, with very few exceptions, all adopting the same policy at the same time frame. Right? This tells us that this is a highly coordinated effort, right, internationally, and that and it tells us that there is a group of people or individuals who are directing the governments essentially what to do. Right? And so this is very compatible with, you know, this globalist agenda moving towards a one world government and with tighter control over the population, with a reduced population, with a new financial, monetary and currency system. And there's evidence for all these aspects. And I think the overall plan has been well laid out in the United Nations document, agenda 21, later changed to agenda 2030. There are many other supporting documents, like you mentioned, the Rockefeller, document, and and there are several others that essentially give all the details to this plan, and they all correlate with the policies that are taking place right now. Speaker 2: In the US, it was billed as 15 days to slow the spread. Citizens consented to measures that prior to the outbreak would have been considered unthinkable, such as social distancing, face coverings, contact tracing, business closures, and travel restrictions. All aspects of life were totally upended. Fortunately, the death rate from the virus was nowhere near what was predicted in event 201. However, suicide rates, domestic violence, depression, and substance abuse all surged as a lockdown itself proved more menacing They knew it would be especially difficult on developing nations and minorities. They were fully aware a crisis of this magnitude would further widen the wealth gap between the rich and the poor. They had foreknowledge of the extreme damage that would be done, and the toll it would take on human health, wealth, emotional, and spiritual well-being. But these twisted, sick, power hungry vampires will use all of this chaos as part of their endgame. Their hope is that by making these inequities more visible, you will readily accept their preplanned solutions. And this is how they plan to do it. Speaker 17: I'm broadly scientifically literate, but what I was saying of this virus, I think we're in the middle of a massive experiment worldwide. And that Speaker 18: words again, you guys? Speaker 17: Maybe. The experiment is, will people listen to scientists? In in this case, referring to medical professionals? In this particular case. Speaker 18: Say Anthony Fauci of Technology and Infectious Disease. Speaker 17: For example? And, are you washing your hands? And are you taking these precautions? These are warnings offered by scientists. Speaker 2: One of the main themes of January's Davos meetings was centered around building trust. In fact, Schwab believes that one of the most critical issues for their plans to succeed is a renewal of trust. The Davos class are pulling out all the stops to get you to agree with their plans. They can't do this smoothly without your trust. You see, this global game works by manufacturing your consent through sophisticated propaganda, predictive programming, and flat out brainwashing. Unless you explicitly say no and do something to resist the plans of the Davos class, they'll take your silence and complacency as permission to proceed with their agenda. This is why they love to use words like inclusive, equitable, resilient, sustainable, multi polar, collaborative, and even social justice to make it seem like you're being invited to the table to help make decisions. In reality, all the decisions have already been made for you, and none of them are truly for your benefit. But the Davos class isn't stupid. They realize that many are on to their schemes and have even acknowledged that the great reset sounds like a nefarious global conspiracy. So they're resorting to gaslighting tactics, like this slickly produced video, to get you to doubt your suspicions and paint anyone contradicting their narrative as a quack. Speaker 19: With everything falling apart, we can reshape the world in ways we couldn't before, ways that better address so many of the challenges we face. And that's why so many are calling for a great reset. A great reset? That sounds more like buzzword bingo, masking some plans for world domination. Hands up. This kind of slogan hasn't gone down well. But all we really want to say is that we all have an opportunity to build a better world. Speaker 2: Yeah. They love to dismiss any reports of their wicked agenda as conspiracy theories. But this sort of propaganda is nothing more than a magic trick. It's street corner sleight of hand with professionally produced videos, reports, and clever marketing. They desperately want you to believe they care deeply about you and are appalled by any resistance. How dare you even think to question them and seek out answers for yourselves? Trust the experts. Trust the government. Trust the bankers. Trust the science. Trust the plan. Trust the Davos class. The COVID pandemic is just the first phase of the plan to get you to surrender to their objectives. So what else do they have in store? The diabolical plans to formulate a global government were fomented long ago. The club of Rome has played a huge role in it going all the way back to 1972 with the publication of its report, The Limits to Growth, which essentially blames all societal problems on there being too many people consuming too many things. One of the primary ways this global syndicate of banking tycoons, intellectuals, scientists, bureaucrats, and their cronies plan to achieve their new world order was by promoting the threat of global warming, which today has morphed into climate change. It is the rules of climate change that's giving global technocrats the pretext to change the world by demanding net zero carbon emissions that would destroy the fossil fuel industry and completely alter the way the world operates. After centuries of running all of the industries that pollute the earth and fill it with poisons, They now want you to believe they have a plan to right all these wrongs. But the Club of Rome, World Economic Forum, and United Nations aren't the only groups advancing this scheme. There's also the World Government Summit among a slew of other organizations, think tanks, and governments working to bring about their dream of global government. Speaker 20: This session, ladies and gentlemen, will focus on the specific types of enablers that are required to achieve sustainable development goals. The objective of this panel discussion is to share general and specific enablers that play a key role in supporting the achievements of the global agenda. Speaker 21: Thank Thank you Speaker 22: very much, and I'm very honored to have this opportunity to share our country's perspective, on implementation, the SDG's agenda. And I think that really this agenda is most ambitious and most complex global agenda, of international community has ever agreed Speaker 23: upon. 1st, allow me to say that we are Speaker 24: very honored to be here today with you. And, in Costa Rica's case, I think it's a combination of things that has enabled, the way we have advanced with the end of 2,030. Starting from our constitution from our second republic, it says Article 50 that we believe in growth, by the way, distribution of wealth and and also including other people and doing it all with while preserving the environment. Speaker 21: My background is in geography and computers or geographic information systems. So I've been working closely with the UN to build what several of the previous speakers talked about, the information system or a federated information system for the SDGs. And essential to that is the question that you asked, which is about data sharing. So this system, which has been architected, is about national systems or national portals collaborating and sharing data into a global sys Speaker 2: The modern offshoots of the Limits to Growth report are agenda 21 and the sustainable development goals of agenda 2030 developed by the United Nations. Is it a mere coincidence that a global pandemic happened at the start of 2020 just in time to usher in a decade of ambitious action and a bid to seize complete control of the planet? Is it by accident that this pandemic has also been used to propel the climate change agenda into overdrive? Another relevant question is, who gave the UN this authority? I never voted for Antonio Guterres, the current secretary general of the United Nations, or any of the previous ones, and I'm sure you didn't either. But back in 1992, a bill was passed in the United States House of Representatives to commit the country to implementing agenda 21. It was sponsored by none other than current house speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and supported by current senate majority leader, Chuck Schumer, and senator Bernie Sanders. Though this bill never passed in the senate, many of its principles have been put in place over the years. No matter where you live, chances are your country has enacted similar laws without your consent. Concepts like social justice, universal basic income, and Green New Deal policies all stem from agenda 21 and when fully in place will do much more harm than good. Thinking that most people are either in agreement with these plans or still locked into the matrix of false reality, the UN even had the audacity to create a website declaring a new world order with happiness, well-being, and freedom of all life on earth by 2050. It brought so much blowback that they eventually removed it. The Davos class and their globalist minions love to pretend that their plans will benefit all humanity while continuing to hold most of the world's wealth and resources within their own coffers. While they promise global equity, they never reveal that it means everyone will be equally poor and dependent on technocratic overlords for every crumb on the table. Over the years, many brave souls have exposed their attempts to pull a bait and switch and leave the 99% with absolutely nothing. Speaker 25: We're we can agree that we're witnessing the great purge. It's the great concentration of wealth and power, the great reveal of willing dictators, the great reallocation of resources, the great digital revolution of the surveillance state. This is the agenda for the 21st century and beyond. It's the great rehash of the old plan. So I'm gonna start there. UN Agenda 21, sustainable development is the comprehensive blueprint. It's the action plan, as the UN calls it, to inventory and control all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, energy, education, transportation, information, Speaker 4: and all Speaker 25: human beings in the world. It's an inventory and control plan. This is the agenda for the 21st century. Speaker 26: So much is going on in the world. Everybody's chasing rabbit trails here and there. If if it isn't a virus, it's the vaccine. If it isn't a vaccine, it's something else. It's 5 gs. It's this, that, and the other. People are chasing after every possible rabbit that I've seen in the last 10 years. And this is not necessarily productive because when people are chasing after the predetermined rabbits that the global elite wants them to chase after, they're not looking at the real target, the real enemy, the real people that are pulling the strings on our global system. And believe me, I'm gonna tell you today that I fully believe that the world, including United States, has been totally pumped and panicked by the global elite into voluntarily giving up our economic system that has supported the world for 1000 of years. Speaker 12: So what is agenda 21? Also referred to as sustainable development, it is not an environmental movement. It is a political movement which seeks to control the world's economy, dictates its development, captures, and redistributes the world's wealth on a national, state, and local level. The process locks away land and resources from use by citizens and plants a central economy while controlling industry, transportation, food production, water, and the growth, size, and location of the population. Speaker 26: The same people who brought us climate change hysteria, the people that produced the studies at universities and so on, they said we're all gonna die in 10 years or 12 years and the seas are gonna rise and the polar bears are gonna die and all that kind of stuff, that whole crowd is the same crowd behind the hysteria that we are suffering under today. The same people who told us under the climate change mantra that we needed to curtail or destroy our economic system so the world can survive, The very same people are telling us that the virus pandemic is going to give us all this death and destruction across the world. And what's the only answer? Shut down your economy. Speaker 12: Today, you will learn how indoctrination is used to soften up the American citizen, to make them receptive to the transformation of a free world into a socialist sustainable development world. Think of all the commercial and nature shows you have seen pushing the green agenda. Think of all the articles our biased media rights pushing the green agenda. Even various churches push the 3 e's. Let's not forget the schools and colleges that have curricula that has agenda 21 ideas embedded that are designed to create good global citizens that are willing to give up their individual constitutional rights for the common good in order to protect the environment. Speaker 2: At the heart of agenda 21, agenda 2030, build back better, climate change, and The Great Reset is Collectivism. As a pioneer of research into plans for global government, g Edward Griffin explains how collectivism is nothing more than clever marketing to get people to give up their individual rights and for countries to give up their sovereignty to global elites. Speaker 27: Collectivism, as you just said in your introduction, is the underlying general ideology that is common to so many of the totalitarian systems of modern times. Communism, fascism, Nazism, all three of those have as, as their underpinning certain common, elements to an ideology that really they're the only things that you should be looking at. The names communism, fascism, Nazism, so forth, are just labels. But they don't describe anything. Collectivism is what we're talking about. So what is collectivism? We don't have time for all of it, but we've been able to identify certain common components. One of them is the idea that the group is more important than the individual and that the individual, if necessary, must be sacrificed for the greater good of the greater number. Speaker 18: Well, collectivism is generally, I think the word was initially used by Ayn Rand. That's the first, usage that I'm really familiar with. But it basically means any system in which the group is, elevated over the rights and importance of the individual. So anything fascism's collectivism, communism's collectivism, any sort of authoritarian system. They're all collectivism because they all use the pretext of the greater good for the greater number as oppose as opposed to the greater good for the individuals. That that is what is elevated, the greater good of the collective and is always at the expense of the individual. Speaker 2: One of the biggest takeaways from Davos 2021 was the constant call for public private partnerships to lead the way in achieving global change. This PPP buzzword is just a fancy way of saying fascism or the merging of corporations and government into one totalitarian entity. So what could go wrong with merging the efforts of global corporations like Bank of America, BlackRock, Facebook, Goldman Sachs, Google, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, Palantir, Pfizer, and Visa with government agencies and civil society. After all, according to Salesforce CEO, Marc Benioff, CEOs were the heroes of the pandemic. Speaker 28: CEOs around the world need to realize they must manage for all stakeholders, not just shareholders. And there has been a mantra for too long that the business of business is business. But today, the business about business is improving the state of the world. And this is more important than ever. We realize that. And so thank you, Klaus, for that. And we don't have to look any farther to that mantra than 2020 itself near the pandemic. In the pandemic, it was CEOs in many many cases all over the world who were the heroes. They are the ones who stepped forward with their financial resources, their corporate resources, their employees, their factories, and pivoted rapidly, not for profit, but to save the world. Speaker 2: The scary part about all of this is that Davos men, like Benioff, really believe they're the good guys, and they really want you to believe it too. By cooperating with governments, these and many other transnational corporations have completely seized control of our food supply, economic systems, transportation, technology, media, utilities, natural resources, health systems, and entertainment industries. These powerful multimillion and $1,000,000,000 corporations have grown into a beast like system of control that dictates the rules of the game in each of their industries and are out to destroy independent operators. To deal with the growing backlash to the greed and control exerted by the Davos class of powerful CEOs and bureaucrats, Klaus Schwab has invented a new economic model called Stakeholder Capitalism, where private corporations are granted the role of trustees of society. Speaker 3: It's companies with which drive innovation. It's companies, who, in a competitive way, drives the 4th industrial revolution, drive, social benefits, and so on. Now some problem which we have is when we talk about capital. We think of financial capital. But, actually, what you need for wealth creation is not just financial capital. It's human capital. It's social capital. It's natural capital. So we need to to embrace a much larger definition of capital, and all those capitals create in a shared way, wealth and indirectly or directly for our country, prosperity. Speaker 2: Along with the new book, Schwab has penned the Davos manifesto, redefining the role of a company to fulfill a broader role in achieving environmental, social, and good governance objectives. Schwab again attempts to gaslight the public into believing that corporations can become altruistic, uphold human rights, and level the playing field to achieve equality. This is like trying to convince people that a leopard really can change its spots. They are really trying to persuade us that the billionaire club is tired of operating soulless, money grabbing machines, destroying the environment, and really, yes, really, want to help the little guy. Be warned though because as the bible says, Satan's ministers love to transform themselves as angels of light. And following this pattern, greedy globalists like John Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and, of course, Bill Gates, all transformed themselves into beloved philanthropists. It seems like this is also the future path of current wealthiest man alive, Jeff Bezos, now formerly of Amazon. But how can anyone in their right mind buy this, given that Bezos' company conspired with Google and Apple to remove an entire social media platform from the Internet. Big tech companies have obliterated free speech and it has nothing to do with the Democrat Republican divide. But whether or not you agree with the tenets of the Davos agenda. On the surface, stakeholder capitalism sounds good, But dig a little deeper and all you're gonna find is a pyramid scheme with a smiley face sticker slapped on it while you still remain at the bottom. Stakeholder capitalism and the Davos manifesto will only serve to increase the control corporations and their billionaire owners exert over every area of the human experience. Davos' newly polished schemes would completely usher in the age of full technocratic dominion. They already proclaimed they want the 99% to own nothing. Why would anyone in their right mind believe this new wave of propaganda, promising that mega corporations will become instruments of good. Speaker 29: This great reset is as serious and as dangerous a threat to our prosperity, to your prosperity, and your freedom as we have faced in decades with these powerful bodies, Speaker 22: including the Speaker 29: World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and even Prince Charles boasting, yes, boasting that when a few within a few short years, yes, their words, you will own nothing and you will be happy. Remember, this is not me saying this. This is them. A terrifying coalition of big business, big tech, and left wing totalitarians are so confident and so brazen. I mean, they just stole the US election so I guess they're feeling pretty chuffed with themselves that they are now promising. You will own nothing and you will be happy. What they should have added is added is and we, the very rich, will own everything and be even happier. Of course, they will. Speaker 2: The real Davos agenda centers around using the fraud of climate change to usher in a technocratic, transhuman, 4th industrial revolution, complete with autonomous vehicles, the Internet of Things, advanced artificial intelligence, smart cities and an Internet of bodies to connect all humans with machines. Yes. Schwab has openly stated that the future will challenge our understanding of what it means to be human, from both a biological and a social standpoint. The Davos class wants to control the land, air, water and every resource on the planet, including humans. It's why you and I and all resources on the planet are referred to as capital and stakeholder capitalism. It's also why COVID nineteen provided the perfect authoritarian control. Without the guise of a pandemic where people were made to fear for their lives, they would have never been able to get this far so fast. Digital currencies, digital IDs, worldwide 5 g coverage, biometric security, and an advanced global surveillance state is the true endgame. The Davos Khan cannot be fully implemented without it. Speaker 10: We are in Tallinn, the capital of Estonia. The Baltic country is home to 1,300,000 people and to one of the most advanced digital societies in the world. From eresidency to online voting to national ID cards, we're here to see how Estonia can be a blueprint for other countries looking to go digital. For our first stop, we went straight to the top with a visit to Estonia's president, Kristi Khelua. If you could describe Estonia's digital society to someone who's maybe never heard of it before, what would you say? Speaker 30: You can apply for a passport. You can apply for a driver's license. You can sell your car and buy your car online, register it online. So most of the services in Estonia, when it concerns public service, is digital. Speaker 29: Estonians realized because they embrace the Internet Speaker 10: we are inside the showroom of E Estonia, which showcases a lot of the country's digital solutions. We're gonna take a look at the electronic ID and digital signatures. Every Estonian is issued a digital ID. Physical ID cards are paired with digital signatures that citizens use to pay taxes, vote, do online banking, and access their health care records. For a small country, the impact of the digital signatures has been big, saving the government an estimated 2% of GDP per year in salaries and expenses. Estonia says 99% of its public services are available online 247. Speaker 2: There's been a lot of talk about how much leisure humans will have once robots and artificial intelligence are taking care of the menial tasks people used to do. Many have bought the lie that the 4th industrial revolution will break freedom and a new utopian era. Maybe this will happen for the Davos class, but what will become of the 1,000,000 and even 1,000,000,000 who will lose their jobs and livelihoods thanks to all this automation. Perhaps, more future planned pandemics will spare them of becoming a serf or mere chattel serving the ruling class. Bill Gates sure seems to be thrilled with the possibilities. Speaker 7: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's annual letter has now just come out. You both write about how this pandemic in your view will be as defining as World War 2. What are the key steps to take right now? Speaker 31: Well, we have to do 2 things at once. We have to bring this epidemic to the to an end, primarily by getting the vaccine out in large numbers to the entire world. And we have to make sure that we're ready, because there will be another pandemic. Speaker 18: Because there will be another pandemic. Speaker 31: And there's so many lessons about, how we weren't prepared, how we should have handled things differently. And, you know, when that's clearly in our mind, those investments need to be made. First, we've got population. The world today has 6,800,000,000 people. That's headed up to about 9,000,000,000. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10% or 15 percent. Speaker 18: We could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 2: Perhaps no one has laid out the true agenda of the Davos class better than the late Aaron Russo. Speaker 4: The ultimate goal that these people have in mind is the goal to, create a one world government run by the banking industry, run by the banking industry. Speaker 8: The whole the whole agenda is to create a one world government where everybody has an RFID chip implanted in them. All money is to be, in those chips. Right? There'll be no more cash. And this is getting straight from Rockefeller himself as they wanna accomplish. And all money will be in your chips. And so any so and that is that having cash, anytime you have money in your in your in your chip, they can take out whatever they wanna take out whenever they want to. They say you owe us this much money in taxes. They just deduct it out of your chip digitally. Speaker 4: Total control. Speaker 8: Total control. And if you're like me or you and you're protesting what they're doing, you can just turn off your chip. You have nothing. You can't buy food. You can't do anything. It's total control of people. And that chip's connected to a Speaker 26: database that has your purchasing records, Speaker 8: what you do Everything. Everything is in there. And so they want a one world government sir. People. That's their goal. That's their intention. Speaker 2: This journey has taken us inside the devious minds of those who believe they are better, smarter, and worthy of making decisions for the rest of us. Decisions that will take away all of our god given freedoms and plunge us into the depths of slavery and genocide. But it is we who need to be reminded to use the tools that god gave us to defeat the evil not only within ourselves, but also in this world. Though this is not a fairy tale, the lessons of one of the most iconic tales still stand true. To overcome increasing despotism, we need to stop cowering in fear and find courage like the cowardly lion. We need to disengage from propaganda and utilize the full capacity of our brains like the scarecrow. We need to stop allowing them to divide us and have our hearts renewed and filled with love, like the Tin Man. And we need to awaken out of the dreamlike state we're in like Dorothy and realize what is really taking place. When we arise from the slumber induced by the media shills and globalist entities pulling their strings, we'll see that they're just mere men and women behind the curtain, trying to manipulate us, just like The Wizard of Oz. The only way they win is by deception, fear, and misplaced trust. Speaker 1: The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one. Don't let it happen. It depends on you. Speaker 3: We are truthers. We do not take shit from mockingbirds. Speaker 18: You should have expected us.
Saved - April 21, 2024 at 3:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The WHO's Global Power Grab is a 2-part film featuring health freedom advocates and politicians discussing the WHO-facilitated corporate power grab. It explores the WHO's funding, conflicts of interest, and the role of its director-general. The film also delves into the IHR 2005 amendments, a proposed pandemic treaty, and its connection to the New World Order agenda. It examines how politicians and mainstream media respond, and suggests actions for people to resist this global corporate coup. Watch and share the film for more information.

@ShabnamPalesaMo - Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

📍WATCH: WHO's #GlobalPowerGrab is a must watch 2-part film featuring almost 100 health freedom advocates + politicians speaking out about the WHO-facilitated corporate power grab. This powerful public interest film was created in South Africa ahead of WHO's World Health Assembly 77 in May 2024 🚸This informative + empowering film highlights: - What is the WHO? Who funds it, where are the conflicts of interests? - Who is its director-general Tedros, how did he come to power? - Understanding the constantly changing, legally binding IHR 2005 amendments + a proposed new pandemic treaty - How does this power grab connect to the New World Order agenda to erode democracy by global governance? - How are politicians responding internationally? - What about the role of mainstream media + factcheckers in censorship? - How can We The People resist this global corporate coup? What actions can we take? ✅ Watch and Share: https://rumble.com/v4qet96-whos-global-power-grab-part-1-preview-9mins.html @sahariivsa @WCH_SouthAfrica @CHD_Africa

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Health Organization, led by controversial figure Tedros, faces criticism for its funding sources and potential power grab. Concerns arise over a new treaty granting WHO authority over global health emergencies, leading to fears of mandatory vaccination and loss of national sovereignty. Calls for defunding and withdrawal from WHO to prevent a move towards a centralized global government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The World Health Organization is the institution granted exclusive power to guide and protect the health and wellness of humanity. The WHO is sustained by private donations, the bulk of which are made by pharmaceutical and biotech corporations who have a vested financial interest in the organization's support. Tedros Ghebreyesus is the World Health Organization's 1st director general that isn't a medical doctor. The appointment to the organization's highest position was controversial given that in his previous role as Ethiopian's health minister, Tedros was accused of covering up 3 major health epidemics. Speaker 1: Tedros is no stranger to controversy. As a former minister of health in Ethiopia, he has been accused of an alleged cover up of 3 possible cholera epidemics. Speaker 0: Prior to his appointment, Kedros was a high ranking member of the Tigray People's Liberation Front, a brutal and corrupt political group responsible for crimes against humanity, including bombings, kidnappings, tortures, and killings. How does a man with such a controversial past score the top position at the world's most influential health organization? Speaker 2: I have known Bill and Melinda for for many, many years now. We will have many body bags in front of us if we don't behave. Speaker 3: If one analyzes how the WHO is funded, one sees that, organizations like the Gates Foundation, are, significant supporters. And so he who pays the piper calls the tune. I think that's a good starting point in looking at these things. Speaker 4: Without our consent, in May 2024, the World Health Organization via member state delegates will exercise a power grab over our health, freedom, and sovereignty. Speaker 5: This is 3 months from now at the next World Health Assembly by WHO's 194 member states. This process takes place behind closed doors and at a tremendous speed. It is not reported nor discussed in our newspapers, in our national parliaments, in universities, nor in society. Speaker 6: There's going to be a very important vote, and Uganda being a member of the World Health Organization is supposed to be informed prior before this vote. But as far as I know none of this has been brought to the attention of parliament yet and yet we have less than a month to go into this vote. Speaker 7: Both of these documents, what they do is they create a new supranational body that gives the WHO legally binding global authority over public health emergencies of international concern. Speaker 8: This is actually worse than what happened in COVID because they don't even have a standard that they have to isolate a pathogen. They don't have to isolate anything. What they have to do is simply say, we think that there is a reason to declare an emergency, and as such, we therefore have the ability to suspend travel to actually penalize member states. There's a very big clause inside of the treaty that actually has penalties on member states for noncompliance. Speaker 9: Or the countries have been Speaker 10: Wait. Wait. Wait. So hold on. I'm interrupting you, but I just wanna the WHO will override, let's say, my country's decision on how to handle the next pandemic. Speaker 9: Right. Exactly. He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Speaker 7: Most worrying for me is actually article 12, which says that in the event of a potential or actual health emergency so this doesn't just relate to pandemics. This is, any health emergency, and that could be anything that the director general shall determine on the basis of information received, and that can be secretive information. It doesn't have to be declared. The director general was one individual who there's a lot of concern about his, his history and experience, but, that he should have this power. And then each country gets 48 hours Speaker 11: 48 hours to respond or explain or face the consequences including sanctions. Speaker 12: Do you think it's going to have an equal sort of footing with all nations, or will there be a difference in in how nations are treated, by the WHO? Speaker 13: So that's, of course, a really good question. If you're asking a country that doesn't have the resources to come back to you within 48 hours and then they don't, not only do you malign them to the emergency committee, but you say, you know what? Maybe we should look at sanctions against this country And maybe this country has got resources like oil and diamonds. Wouldn't that just be very convenient? Speaker 5: WHO will be authorized to issue recommendations with legally binding effects. Speaker 14: You know, when you take out the words not binding as an amendment, it then becomes binding. These these are binding treaties. If we do nothing, these treaties are binding. They're legally binding across all the nations. Speaker 5: This is legislation. This is legislation directed, directly affecting every human being. We are talking about Compulsory vaccination, lockdowns, closures of borders, and businesses, and worst of all, detention of anyone not complying with the latest vaccine mandate and forced medical procedures. This will come under the title and concept of 1 Health. So whether to fight a human influenza with a new subtype or to reduce rising level of CO2 or to respond to the loss of biodiversity or to fight climate change, all of that can give rise to the next pandemic. Speaker 15: They will be able to impose a climate lockdown. That's the next step. That's what we're talking about. Speaker 16: We see all these kind of, authoritarian measures being adopted in the name of saving the planet. Speaker 10: It's global governance. Speaker 9: Tyranny organized tyranny under Velvet and the Golden Cage. You know It's Speaker 10: a yeah. It's a very clear. It's a form of global governance, isn't it? Speaker 9: Oh, it is. It is a centralized global government, but we didn't know how they were gonna do it. And they are using health in all policies to create this global governance. Speaker 11: Towards a one world government seeking to erode the sovereignty of independent nations. Speaker 17: There would be amendments to implement an international global health certification system enabling nations to enforce travel restrictions using tools such as vaccine certificates, passenger locator forms and travel health declarations all tied potentially to a personal QR code. Speaker 7: And then a mass surveillance of compliance via digital certificates. So we all have to have digital certificates And in that way, they will check whether we're all doing what we're told. Speaker 11: That could lead to draconian measures undermining our national interest if accepted. Speaker 5: Which means what? Speaker 3: It means Speaker 9: that when there is a national health security threat, you can take over the country with the army. So you imagine this at the global level? Speaker 10: Right. Speaker 9: So if they get the global commands Speaker 0: So it's martial law? Speaker 9: It's martial Speaker 3: law. And the title of this session, are we ready for a new world order? Speaker 18: We have a real chance at this new world order. An order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders. Speaker 15: When you really take all of this together, there is no other way for me to to actually say this. It will be a complete impoverishment and enslavement of all the people. Speaker 19: People have to understand it's all about control. So being aware of the globalist endgame in all of this, namely the implementation of a global governing system to control us, it seems to me that the powers that be will attempt to launch major crises, plural, on several fronts to facilitate this push into their new world order. Speaker 11: Withdrawn from WHO. Speaker 10: My view is get out of the Speaker 2: hoe. Conclusion, defenders of freedom on both sides of the Atlantic need Speaker 20: to stop these amendments from coming into pass. Speaker 11: And call on all political parties and South Africans to reject the woo's power grab under the guise of pandemic preparedness. Speaker 13: Can I get a quick vote from everybody here right now? Who thinks we need to defund and exit from the WHO? Speaker 6: That's a Speaker 13: full house that people have voted. Speaker 7: Thank you very Speaker 8: much.
WHO's Global Power Grab - Part 1 Preview (9mins) WHO's #GlobalPowerGrab is a must watch two-part film featuring almost 100 health freedom advocates and multiple politicians speaking out about the WHO-facilitated corporate power grab. This powerful p rumble.com
Saved - June 11, 2024 at 2:21 AM

@CalenArcher - American Archer

THE FALL OF THE CABAL - FULL MOVIE This is Potentially the most eye opening documentary ever made. This is a VERY well researched exposé on the Global Cabal - uncovering the deepest conspiracies and their plan for world dominance This can be extremely unsettling - be prepared https://t.co/AokRT3RWv5

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explores various conspiracy theories and controversial topics, including elite plans, forest fires, chemtrails, organ donation, the Vatican, 9/11, abortion, the migrant caravan, the Federal Reserve, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, George Soros, Hollywood, and pedophilia. It suggests that there is a battle between good and evil, with the truth being concealed by the mainstream media. The video also discusses the QAnon phenomenon and its belief in a corruption-free world. It concludes by mentioning President Trump's efforts to combat human trafficking and his alleged role in exposing corruption. Additionally, the video delves into conspiracy theories related to Pizzagate, satanic rituals, and child trafficking, implicating political figures such as the Clintons and the Dutch royal family. It highlights alleged connections between the elite, satanic cults, and child sacrifice. The video warns viewers about disturbing evidence and advises against watching certain related videos or images. It further reveals a hidden order above the visible top of the power pyramid, controlling influential figures like George Soros and government leaders. The Jesuit order, three popes, Agenda 21, and depopulation programs are mentioned. Despite this dark reality, the video emphasizes hope through the awakening of the QAnon movement, leading to global protests. The mainstream media's attempts to downplay these protests are discussed, while the truth spreads through social media. The video suggests that the cabal has used violence to suppress the movement, but the people remain united. Q, potentially including Donald Trump and loyal army generals, is working to expose the cabal. Hidden messages and clues are believed to be present in Trump's actions and tweets. The video predicts that the truth about the cabal's crimes, such as child trafficking and high treason, will soon be revealed, resulting in mass arrests. It concludes by stating that the world is on the brink of a significant transition, offering the promise of world peace and a new era of equality and harmony.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are about to witness one of the greatest events in human history. The world as we know it is crumbling before our very eyes, and the majority of the world population is not aware of it. Power structures that have been in place for 1000 of years are taken down as we speak. Soon, we'll be shown evidence of an elite plan. So evil, so all encompassing that people will be shocked to the core. This documentary was made to help you deal with what's coming. Is it a good thing? Oh, yes. It's the best thing that could possibly happen to us. But in order to understand and process the quantum leap that we, as humanity, are about to take, you must understand the reality, the timeline, if you wish, that we, as a species, were placed in. And believe me, you don't have a clue just yet. The evil I mentioned has been working behind the scenes, so intelligently, so brilliantly that hardly anyone ever noticed a thing. What I'm going to do is first of all, give you a short overview of things that made me go, things that made me decide to start digging for the truth. We'll take it from there, shall we? Are you ready? Join me on a journey down the rabbit hole. Let's start with the recent forest fires. For instance, in California, did you know that these fires forgot to burn trees? That they were capable of cutting through houses? That they burned trees from the inside out? That they were able to lift cars, tilt them, and smash them down? Are you sure these are ordinary forest fires? And how about this one? We live in a world where mercury is considered highly toxic, but not when we inject it into children in absurd quantities. No doubt you've heard about chemtrails. Denied by our governments for a long time, but recently acknowledged and referred to as geoengineering aerosols. They are sprayed into our atmosphere to protect us from global warming. The thing that makes me go, however, is the fact that we're sprayed with heavy metals, which are stored in our brains, where they have proven to cause Alzheimer and Parkinson disease. And did you know that in many countries, among which my own Holland, we have to explicitly say no to organ donation. For if we don't, our organs will be property of the state as soon as we are declared brain dead? The last time it was arranged this way by law was during the Nazi occupation. Did you know that our current pope is the first to state that hell does not exist? But the devil does. Isn't it weird that the Vatican's audience hall is full of references to reptilians? Snakes? Serpents? Did you know the Vatican's telescope is called Lucifer? And since when does the pope make the sign of the devil? 911. Whereas one bird can cause terrible damage to a plane, on 911, 2 planes managed to cut through steel. A third plane mysteriously disappeared in a building, and number 4 plunged into the earth without leaving any debris or bodies. The planes were piloted by terrorists who only had had a few flying lessons in a small chestnut. Then there are the horrid attacks on innocent people in which the same victims can survive up to 3 different attacks. This lucky young man survived being shot in the head. All he needed was a Band Aid. And thank god not all victims are people of flesh and blood. What do you think about this one? Are you a parent? Are you aware of the fact that children cartoons contain subliminal messages of sex and violence? Why? Did you know that fully grown fetuses can be legally aborted in many American states? That advocates of full term abortion state that unborn babies cannot feel pain? Whereas every doctor knows that the nervous system is the first to develop in fetuses? Is abortion of a fully grown baby not the same as murder? Okay. Let's have a look at the migrant caravan. Thousands of people fled their South American homes to look for a better future in the US. The trip covered 2,000 miles in one and a half months in order to be on time for the American midterm elections as a political statement against president Trump. This means they walked an average of 45 miles a day on flip flops. Barefoot, like this, and like this. 45 miles a day? Why do Hollywood celebrities promote the use of facial creams containing the foreskin of baby boys? Do you realize that these foreskins are actually sold? That it's a trade? What's next? Drinking baby blood? Now I'm going to give you 5 more, although I could go on forever. Counting down, number 5. Did you know that diseases such as AIDS, Zika, SARS, and Ebola are actually patented? Do you know when something is patented? When it's man made, man made diseases. Are you kidding me? Number 4, your cell phone, laptop, tablet, and your TV contains spyware that works 247. No matter whether your device is switched on or off. This means you are constantly being monitored. Each and every conversation, whether at home or at work, is recorded. Why? And by whom? Number 3. In 2018, Monsanto, known for its genetically modified seeds and crops, plus its poisonous weed killer roundup, was bought by Bayer, a chemical giant that produces mostly poison. In other words, our food supply is now largely controlled by the producers of carcinogenic poison. Monsanto started off producing agent orange, a very powerful and highly toxic chemical used during the Vietnam war to eliminate forest cover and to destroy crops. But it turned out to do just a little bit more than that, causing horrific birth deformities and various types of cancer. According to the experts, the fusion of Monsanto and Bayer was the perfect match made in hell. Number 2. In 2018, Hillary Clinton admitted that she deleted 33,000 emails from a private server used as secretary of state. Not only that, she used a hammer to smash her cell phone, SIM cards, and hard drives. Any further evidence that could have been used against her in a court of law was destroyed by fire that conveniently started in the office of a mansion. Did she actually get away with that? And last but not least, number 1, President Obama received the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize only months after his inauguration. Why for god's sake? He came from nowhere and had achieved nothing at the time. In the following 8 years, he invaded 7 countries and dropped a bomb every 20 minutes. Who on earth was on that Nobel committee? The world is not what you think. And guess what all of these things have in common? They were completely ignored by the mainstream media. Not one news channel covered or questioned any of it. And just when I thought I'd seen it all, this became president of the US. I always thought there were 2 political sides in life, left and right. Left was for the common people. Right was for the rich. But I soon found out that my ideas did not reflect reality at all. Obama seemed to have enchanted everybody, including myself, with his good looks and charms. But like I said, he invaded 7 countries. He was a democrat for God's sake. And democrat Bill Clinton went from one sex scandal to the next, lying under oath and getting away with it. Maybe left and right were simply two wings of the same bird. In spite of my leftist upbringing and background and my fierce opposition against Trump, I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt. But how did he get elected in the first place? Just before the elections, WikiLeaks arose. Founded by Julian Assange in 2,006, WikiLeaks is a giant online library of the world's most censored documents obtained by whistleblowers at the highest level. Much information deals with war, spying, and corruption. Now just before the presidential elections, WikiLeaks published highly incriminating evidence of the corruption within the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton presidential campaign. So what happened? That happened. On January 20 2017, Donald j Trump was inaugurated as president of the United States of America. But how did WikiLeaks obtain the evidence of the clinter corruption? It was leaked by an employee of the Democratic National Committee, Seth Rich, who was subsequently found dead with 2 bullets in his back. Who killed Seth Rich? We will find out in the next episodes. What do we have for now? Donald Trump as president of the US. And then out of nowhere arose the enigma of q. On October 28, 2017, a mysterious post was placed on 4 chan, an anonymous Internet bulletin board. It contained nothing but codes. This was the beginning of a new phenomenon. The, soon to be transferred to Achan due to hacking, became more and more intriguing and popular among the so called, Anonymous people who are wary of the lies of the mainstream media and who've gone searching for the truth using other news outlets on the Internet. I will get into the identity of q later on in this documentary. Q communicates with the people by means of the q posts, drops, or crumbs that we, the pick up and decipher. The portray a better world without wars, treason, and corruption. A world after the great awakening. Kyu uses words and short sentences that keep coming back. Sometimes, the cue drops are short and to the point. Initials are used instead of full names. Sometimes, they contain a lot of information. And sometimes, combinations of letters and numbers are used for us to rearrange. The cue clock was introduced and it took us quite some time to figure out how to read it. And then there was the cue map, containing an incredible amount of vital information. The map was made by Dylan Lewis Munro. It contains an overview of the true history of mankind and its covert power structures. Q is not a cult as suggested by opponents. After all, it tells us not what to think or what to do. It merely gives us questions, clues, and riddles. We need to do the research in order to find the answers. And that is how we discover the truth. Through this research, I've come to find out more about American and global politics than I'd ever dreamed of. I was never really interested in politics, but the Q drops opened my eyes to a whole new world, a world of secret societies, Secret services within secret services, and secret deals made on a grand scale. A world with shadow governments, with an excessively rich one percent of the world population that actually runs the world. Not our political leaders, not our presidents, but a very small group that we refer to as the Illuminati or cabal. I learned about an evil master plan to completely dominate the world. And the ordinary people, like you and I, we know nothing. We get up in the morning, We go to work. We pay our bills and our taxes. We watch TV and go to bed, not knowing that there's a battle being fought over our heads for world dominance. A battle between good and evil. This is what q is pointing out to us. But we, the Anom's, have to do the research, And we do. Like nerds, like an army of digital artists, we connect the dots. There is a war going on for world dominance, for the absolute submission of the masses. How is this achieved? By the constant waging of war. By the introduction of the Federal Reserve Bank and Central Banks. By trafficking drugs, oil, and people. The only 2 American presidents who try to break down the power of the elite, beginning with the banks, by printing their own interest free, debt free money, thus bypassing the Federal Reserve System were Abraham Lincoln and John f Kennedy. What else did they have in common? They got murdered. Now why are the banks so important? What exactly is the Federal Reserve and its central banks? The Federal Reserve is the central bank system of the US. And in spite of the very misleading word federal, the Federal Reserve and all central banks around the world are privately owned. They are not government institutions. They are owned by some of the most wealthy and influential families in the world. 2 of which are close to the top of the power pyramid, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. The Federal Reserve was set up in 1913, after quite a bit of opposition from the US government and some very wealthy people, such as Benjamin Guggenheim from a very influential mining family, Isidore Strauss, head of Macy's department stores and politician, and John Jacob Astor, businessman, inventor, and probably one of the wealthiest men at that time. The wealth of these 3 men in those days was approximately $500,000,000, which today would amount to something like 11,000,000,000. These men were so rich, they could not be bought, not by any bank. What else did they have in common apart from money, power, and opposing the creation of the US Federal Reserve? They all died on April 15, 1912, when the ship they traveled on hit an iceberg and disappeared in the cold ocean. Coincidence? Let's just say the Titanic disaster was highly convenient. The rest of the opposition was easily cornered. US congress was bypassed. The fed was created illegally, unconstitutionally, something not many people are aware of. Let's have a look at the visible top of the power pyramid. There, we have the Rothschild family. In short, this family owns most of the world. They own each and every central bank. They own the federal reserve. They control the International Monetary Fund. They control the World Health Organization. They financed both parties of every war since the war against Napoleon. They financed the Bolshevik revolution. They financed Hitler and the Nazis. They financed the production of IBM's punching machines for an efficient prosecution of the Jews by the Nazis, and they had equities in Exxon, NIG, Farben, the dealers of zyclon b gas for the Nazi gas chambers. The estimated net worth of the Rothschild family is $500,000,000,000. When you have that much money and power, you can poke the chest of the crown prince of Great Britain like he's your bitch. And when you oppose their power and try to stop them from taking over your banking system by setting up a central bank in your country that loans money to you at insane interest rates that you can never pay back so that your country becomes the eternal slave to the Rothschild banking system, as happened to every country around the world, you are either ousted or killed. Your country will be invaded and blown to smithereens in the name of democracy, supported by the mainstream media that portrays you as a dictator. The same applies to those who refuse to accept the almighty US Petro Dollar. Oh, and there's much more, but we'll leave that for another time. The Rothschilds are not the only ones dominating the world. They are just part of the 1%, the elite. Another family of great influence are the Rockefellers. They made their initial fortune through oil. That fortune led to massive industrial influence, influence in American politics, the banking system, and the pharmaceutical industry. They founded schools and universities, leaving a huge imprint on what should and should not be taught to our children and students. The Rockefellers further expanded their tentacles of power into the medical world and into hospitals. They now own the Rockefeller University with its academy of medicine and the academy of sciences, the International Health Foundation, the American Cancer Society, the drug trust, the American Medical Association, and the FDA. Everything was in the hands of the Rockefellers. They further infiltrated the educational and medical system by means of the Rockefeller Foundation, giving grants to specific research programs, such as the research and development of vaccines. For instance, against Ebola, yellow fever, Zika, the flu, and Gardasil, which is further developed and promoted by billionaire and partner in crime, Bill Gates. Every case of dangerous side effects such as miscarriage, autism, sterility, seizures, paralysis, And death was brought before the FDA and cleared. And all of the above was promoted by doctors and the media, where the Rockefellers have placed their representatives at the highest levels. Even presidents assured us it was safe. All use of alternative healing was demonized and prohibited, while the treatment with drugs and the drug dependency were pushed down the political agenda. The Rockefellers were also responsible for adding the toxic chemical waste product, fluoride, to our water and toothpaste. And as usual, the media spread lies about its healing qualities. No doctor or dentist ever tested its efficacy. They simply told their patients what they've been taught at the Rockefeller Institutions. Yet another field of interest was the genetic manipulation of crops. The Rockefellers own millions of shares of Monsanto stock, as does their partner, Bill Gates. The mutual interest in Eugenics, which aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population, will come as no surprise. Back in Nazi Germany, the Rockefeller financed the horrific eugenics experiments performed on Jewish people trying to create a superior master race. So in short, 2 very powerful families that rule the world and its population are the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. And guess what? They are not even the most powerful. There are other families that exceed and the Rothchilds, both in money and in power, but I will not go any deeper into that at this stage. We'll save that for later, shall we? There's one more man I want to put in the limelight right now, George Soros, described by the mainstream media as investor and philanthropist. His net worth, $25,000,000,000. Soros was born in Hungary. After World War 2, he moved to England and then on to the US, where he made a fortune with his hedge funds and his merciless ways to manipulate the financial market, using crisis to further increase his own wealth and expand his power. He prides himself in taking no responsibility for his actions and destruction he caused to literally millions of people. I quote, I'm here to make money. I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do. Soros strikes me for his choice of funding. For example, Numbla, the North American Man Boy Love Association. Their goal and their slogan, sex before 8, before it's too late. This is the mascot. Why does this great benefactor support a pedophile club such as Nambla? Then there's Antifa, the antifascist movement. When we look at their actions, we see nothing but violence. They show great resemblance with fascism, which is rather strange for an anti fascist movement. Even one of their flags is weird in that sense. Why would anyone finance such a thing? The same goes for black lives matter. Why sponsor a movement that pretends to be left wing, that shows nothing but riots and violence in practice? Do you want to know what we're dealing with here? Then follow me to part 3. The migrant caravan that headed to the southern border of the US in April 2018 was covered by the media big time. According to the official reports, these people came mostly from Honduras, where the caravan had started. And then people from Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Mexico joined the march. The main reasons for them to flee their home country were gang violence and poverty. When I saw the first pictures, I was shocked. But then I realized there were just too many images of women and children, which is always a sign of media manipulation and a hidden political agenda, always. Critical thinkers like the qanon studied the pictures closely. Too many things did not add up. Like I said in part 1, these people had to walk for 45 miles a day, each and every day for one and a half months. But these people don't look exhausted. They're not dirty or sweaty. I mean, look at them. Their clothes are clean, clean babies, clean pants. They wear labels. They are well fed. These people aren't refugees. They're not poor. I traveled through Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras, and I saw poverty. Believe me, these people are not poor. 45 miles a day on flip flops? Are you kidding me? Or even barefoot? Come on. Where are the blisters? And why aren't they carrying what is needed for a journey like that? Blankets, food, water. Where are the spare diapers? Some people do have small backpacks, but they appear to be brand new. So, what did happen? First of all, buses and vans were deployed to transport all of these people from Honduras to the US border. Flip flops? No problem. You only have to get out of the van occasionally for a group photo. Next, in order to get as many people as possible, you pay them. Thanks to some alert anons, this was filmed on-site. Then in order to be efficient for the media, you give the main players a colored wristband. Brilliant. Different colors, different meanings, all known to the reporters and the cameraman. Some people overreact. Others are really convincing and make it to the world news report. Meet Maria Mesa and her 5 children all the way from Honduras. She made it to every news item on TV, telling about a terror, the fear for children. Their eyes all wet and swollen due to the tear gas that the American border patrol so viciously threw with them. Well, Maria, there are a few flaws in your story. I've looked at every single picture of you and your beautiful wheels. None of them show any signs of tear gas. This picture clearly shows that you are the only ones in action. The cameraman shoots away completely by the gas. There is no panic. Let's have a closer look at this picture. Cameramen are standing in the line of smoke, yet have no problem with that. Oh wait, look, Somebody is throwing a gas canister. Is that a fellow refugee? Maria told the press that her son went the next day to get the canister and show it to the reporters. Shame on you, America. I do hope Maria was paid handsomely. I really do. But a story sucks. The family was photographed on another day getting out of a van for yet another day's work in front of the camera. And the Tia gas canister, you can buy them at any theater prop retailer or you can use the police training variety. They produce white smoke, but no harm is done. I guess Trump's statement was correct. No tear gas was used on the children. The entire mainstream media coverage of this event was biased and flawed. My advice to the producers, next time, pay more attention to the details for the are on to you. Refugees who walk for 1,000 of miles do not walk like this, or like this. They don't wear flip flops. They don't have brand new Bing buggies. They do not polish their nails. They don't wear iron shirts, neither do they have perfect haircuts and makeup. When they say they flee their country because they're so poor, they can't even buy food, don't show them with digital cameras and iPhones. Refugees who walk for 1,000 of miles are not clean. And for god's sake, pay attention to some of your supporting actors. And when you Photoshop someone into a picture, make sure you don't forget his leg. Oh, and make up your mind, will you? Do you want the shirt on or off? And what's with the Disney obsession? When you really want to know what's going on in the world, you have to do the research just like you keep saying. And when you do, you will see what's real and what's not. The migrant caravan was a staged event with a political motive. Who was behind it? Who financed such a great event? George Soros. That's right. Our great benefactor, George Soros, connected to the pedophile club, Namla, and the writing in violent Antifa and Black Lives Matter. How do we know he's behind all of these so called social movements? Well, it's not really a secret. According to an analysis of his tax filings, he invested $33,000,000 in the notorious Ferguson riots alone. Soros promised everyone who participated in the massive protest, $15 an hour. In the case of the migrant caravan, all they had to do was play the part of all refugees looking for a safe haven. Money, new clothes, food, toys, and an extra bonus if you play your part well. Who'd refuse a job like that? Soros made a mistake by not fulfilling his financial promises. So then we had more riots. This time, by angry actors who demanded payment. Videos of Antifa members shouting, Soros, Soros, where's our money? Went viral. Yet everything was hushed up by the mainstream media. So what's his motive? Why would anyone invest so much money in these massive and well organized movements? To destabilize a country, to create division. Division by skin color, by political wing, by religion, by gender. A divided people is easy to rule, a united people is not. Let's go back to the q phenomenon. As we have seen in part 2, q strongly emphasizes the importance to unite. United, we stand. Divided, we fall. Q portrays a better world without wars, treason, and corruption. And whether you like it or not, the task to get there has been put in the hands of Donald j Trump. Now normally, when I say this to people, I get the most vicious looks. Thanks to the mainstream media, the majority of the Dutch people believe Trump to be a narcissistic dictator. But, hey, let's talk some facts here, shall we? Trump went to North Korea. He'll start a nuclear war, the media shouted. But he came back with peace. 6,000,000 new jobs have been created under Trump. Lowest unemployment rate since 50 years. He created the biggest tax cuts ever for all social classes. He is the only president ever to work for free. He signs an executive order to clean the oceans. Did you hear about that on the news? No. For some reason, the mainstream media have a political agenda of their own, but more about that later. From my point of view, one of the most important priorities of Trump is to protect the children. Right after his inauguration, he stated that his administration would focus on ending the horrific practice of human trafficking, also referred to as modern slavery. On December 21, 2017, he signed an executive order blocking the property of people involved in serious human rights abuse and corruption. More executive orders follow to protect victims of human trafficking. A huge campaign was deployed to educate parents and children about the dangers of human trafficking. Throughout 2018 19, many arrests took place. Thousands of child molasses were arrested. Thousands of victims were rescued. Trump keeps emphasizing that most victims are smuggled into the country through the southern border. He shows numbers, statistics. He made January human trafficking awareness month. He informed the people about MS 13, a criminal gang responsible for raping and killing many American citizens. He swore he would take them down to the last member. He keeps emphasizing the drugs problem and the 1,000,000,000 of dollars, plus the countless lives it costs each year. He keeps pleading for a wall. Anything to reduce the drugs and human trafficking numbers as much as possible. But the mainstream media keep twisting his words, making it sound like immigrants aren't welcome. I have watched these interviews time and again, and I can assure you that according to president Trump, immigrants are most welcome, but they have to come in legally. The funny thing is Bill Clinton wanted a wall. Obama wanted a wall. Hillary wanted a wall? They all voted for a wall when they were still in the senate. I'm talking about the 2006 secure fence act, passed by a republican congress and signed by president George w Bush. It wasn't a problem back then. But now all of a sudden, Trump is an immigrant hater. The more I study the subject, the more I understand why Trump is bashing fake news. But more about that soon. Back to Trump's war against human traffickers. For years, whistleblowers at the highest levels have been stepping forward with testimonies about child trafficking for the elite. This is nothing new. It was just never dealt with until now. The thing is, when I talk about this in my presentations, people don't want to hear about it. They don't want to look at these pictures, which I understand. I would rather look away as well. But that reminds me of the famous one liner of the Germans right after World War 2. After being confronted with a painful question, how could you let the Nazi atrocities happen? Why didn't you do something? The answer was always, We didn't know. Of course, they knew. It was just too painful and too dangerous to acknowledge it and to do something about it. Well, I will not look away any longer. These kids are not held by our denial. They are held by our action. So for god's sake, keep watching. We are the only hope they have left. Child trafficking for the elite, that is bigger than pedophilia. We are talking about a huge criminal organization kidnapping children and selling them to high ranking officials, from mayors, judges, and senators, to presidents, and even royalty. Do you think this is far fetched? Do you think it's just a conspiracy theory? Get ready for some conspiracy facts in part 4. In 2010, right after the devastating earthquake, 33 children were smuggled out of Haiti. The woman who was arrested, Laura Gaylor Silsbee, said they were orphans who were about to be adopted in the US. Upon investigation, however, it turned out most of these children were not orphans. They were later reunited with their parents. Furthermore, there were no adoption papers to be found. These kids had simply been abducted, Stolen from their parents. Who exactly is this Laura Gailis Silsbee? First of all, she was on the board of directors of AlertSense, the company that provides the technology for Amber Alert. Amber Alert is the broadcast emergency response to recover abducted children. Isn't that an interesting paradox? A convicted child trafficker? Yes. She was found guilty and convicted. Connected to Amber Alert, set up to rescue children? Secondly, this lady is the founder of the Baptist organization, New Life Children's Refuge, a northern rescue mission for Haiti. Sounds to me like she had a ways to smuggle children out of the country real easy. Nice cover. Last but not least, she's a close friend of the Clintons, who immediately paid for a lawyer, Jorge Puellio, who himself is a convicted pedophile. He was arrested and convicted for leading an international human trafficking ring involving women and children. All of this came out into the open, thanks to WikiLeaks that published the secret emails between the Clintons and Laura Gaylor Silsbee. Let's continue with Haiti some more before moving on, shall we? Haiti was put in the limelines once again with the Oxfam scandal. Oxfam, known for its shops throughout the world for empowering women and for fighting poverty, was banned from Haiti following the 2010 earthquake. There were orgies with prostitutes, some of which were underage. In other words, with children. Leaked emails further confirm that $3,000,000 were diverted from the Haitian relief funds via the Clinton Foundation to pay for Chelsea's extravagant 2010 wedding. When Trump called Haiti a shithole, the whole world went mad. But he was right. What he referred to was what the so called nonprofit organizations had turned the island into after the earthquake. The Red Cross collected half a $1,000,000,000 for Haiti, and all it did was build 6 houses. The Clinton Foundation ruthlessly misappropriated the earthquake donations from international donors and got away with it. Claus Eberwein, a former government official of Haiti, due to testify about the Clinton corruption, was found dead with a bullet in his head only days before the trial on July 12, 2017. Monica Peterson, the young social apologist who went to Haiti to investigate human trafficking on the island and who tweeted some critical thoughts about the Clinton Foundation, was found dead by hanging shortly after, in November 2016. Her death was ruled suicide. And when surgeon doctor Dean Loric openly vented his disgust about the corruption by the Clinton Foundation that he himself witnessed while trying to save lives on the island, he too ended up dead. In December 2017, he was found on the bathroom floor of his in New York with a knife in his chest. His death too was ruled suicide. But, hey, let's not dwell on the many suicides surrounding the Clintons. Let's go back to one of q's often repeated sentences. Symbolism will be their downfall. In 2007, the FBI released a bulletin with symbols used by pedophiles to identify their sexual preferences and to communicate where to find both each other and their prey. The blue triangles identify boy lovers, the pink hearts are for girl lovers and the butterflies for child lovers in general. These pedophile logos will indeed be their downfall. They are in plain sight, for they never thought people would wake up and see. And just like we saw with Amber Alert, it's the organizations that claim to protect children that actually use pedophile logos. For instance, the international adoption clinic. Newstar Kefala, a Muslim adoption and child advocacy agency. This is the logo for their hope program, helping orphans progress emotionally. Then there's the Pacific Crest Trade Association. It changed its logo in July 2017 after the pedophile connection in the capital a was discovered by the public. Now I'm not saying these organizations are proven pedophile dense. I'm merely pointing out the interesting choice of logo, which, of course, could be totally based on coincidence. This logo eerily resembles the boy lover symbol. It was used by the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation, set up by the Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, in honor of his father. This logo was on the 2015, 16 annual report. Then there's Alpida, a Canadian refuge charity. Alpida was founded by the Ratcliffe Foundation, set up and owned by Frank Giustra. Now apart from the interesting choice of logo, there are a few things about mister D'Youstrava that fascinate me. First of all, he's a major sponsor to the Clinton Foundation. We're talking $100,000,000 and more. He loved going to Haiti with the Clintons. And he founded the boys club network for boys between 12 18, seeking connection and mentorship. His cofounder is Jim Crescenzo, a teacher from Vancouver, who received an excellence award from none other than Justin Trudeau. Now once again, I'm sure this is just coincidence. But what is it that you keep saying about coincidence? How many coincidences before mathematically impossible? For someone who claims to be a decent family man, Justin Trudeau sure has some interesting friends. Take Christopher Inglisun, a Canadian private school teacher, convicted for the possession and distribution of child porn. For many years, he was Trudeau's friend and roommate. Then there's his best friend, Peter Dalglish, the world renowned humanitarian who was caught in the act in Nepal with 2 children, aged 12 14. He was the founder of Street Kids International and the Trails Youth Initiative program. Now I'm sure these programs do great things for kids, but why choose pedophile logos? And why are so many set up by registered and convicted pedophiles and sex offenders? I mean, if you're a pedophile, wouldn't it be great to have your own child protection program? To have access to all those lovely children to pick from? Mind you, these children often come from troubled backgrounds. Some have criminal records. Many suffered from neglect and abuse in early childhood. Easy prey, and no concerned loving parents to protect them. I mean, look at CPS, the child protective services, exposed in 2,007 for legally kidnapping and selling children for adoption out of foster care. The lady who exposed them, congresswoman Nancy Schafer, was murdered in 2010. Now back to Trudeau's interesting best friends. Here we have Ben Levin, former deputy minister of the Ministry of Education, arrested and convicted in 2013 for making and distributing child pornography. Then there's Jian Ghomeshi, the Canadian CBC radio host, arrested and charged in 2015 with 7 counts of sexual assault and one count of overcoming resistance by choking. Now I don't know about this, but if I were Trudeau, I'd be more careful selecting my friends. He is surrounded by registered pedophiles and sex offenders. There's another prominent place where the FBI symbols of pedophilia can be found, in Hollywood. We briefly saw in part 1 that children cartoons contain references to sex and violence. Doesn't that make you wonder who Walt Disney really was? Why are children exposed to Illuminati symbols, such as pyramids and the all seeing eye time and again? And why are pedophile logos used for candy and ice cream? Yet another thing that attracts children. The more I dived into this topic, the more I realized to what extent this had actually drenched our society. Top directors, such as James Gunn, who openly and proudly tweet about being a pedophile. I guess this is normal in Hollywood. He was fired over these tweets. Rightly so, one would think. But only a few weeks later, he was back at work. Out through the front door, back in through the back door. Nickelodeon's producer, Dan Snyder, lost his job because he couldn't keep his hands off of young girls. And here we have Brian Peck, a convicted child molester, who only spent 16 months in jail, after which he was offered a job right back with Disney, where he continued working with underage girls. Once again, out through the front door, back in through the back door. Jason James Murphy kidnapped and assaulted an 8 year old boy in 1996. He served 5 years in jail, moved to California, used his shorter name, Jason James, and became a casting agent for child actors. The list of sexual predators in Hollywood is endless. Only recently were some of them called out by their victims and arrested. Most victims never dare to speak up, for their predators are absolute legends in Hollywood. Actor Corey Feldman was one of the first to speak up about child abuse in Hollywood. He and his best friend, Corey Haim, became actors at a very young age. They were incredibly successful and famous, but the price was high. They were sexually abused by various adults they work with. It was common knowledge that the 2 Corries were passed around at Hollywood parties. They resulted in great trauma that was buried for many years. The 2 Corries sought relief in alcohol and drugs, which eventually led to Corey Haim's death at the age of 38. It wasn't until recently that Corey Feldman called out his abusers. Elia Wood, who became world famous for his part as Frodo in the Lord of the Rings, supported Corey Feldman's statements about Hollywood as a pedophile den. Elia was protected by his mother, who wouldn't let him visit any of the parties where a lot of the abuse took place. World renowned actors such as Robert Downey Junior and Brad Pitt also stepped forward to support all of these statements. If you think that sounds crazy, wait till you hear Mel Gibson. The world famous megastar, both as actor and producer, was blacklisted by Hollywood for stating that Hollywood is a den of parasites who feast on the blood of kids. You took it a whole lot further. Read for for yourself. Could this be true? Eating babies, drinking their blood, Will this have a happy ending? Oh, yes. Let's move on to part 5. In part 1, we briefly looked at the sexualization of children and the normalization of pedophilia in our society. Innocence is sexier than you think? And what about this clothing store called sweet and sexy kids? What the hell is sexy about kids? At an academic presentation at Cambridge University in June 2018, it was actually stated that the majority of men are probably pedophiles, and that pedophilic interest is normal and healthy. The New York Times declared pedophilia not a crime, but a disorder. And during 2 TEDx talks, pedophilia was presented not as a disorder, but as a sexual orientation. Posters were spread. And Cosmopolitan Magazine published an article by the hand of a young woman who became a father's lover. Now, of course, in order to make all of this legal, the age of consent had to go down so that having sex with a child would no longer be a crime. No problem. Judges and politicians at the highest level did their utmost best to take care of that. Not many people know that Patricia Hewitt was general secretary of the NCCL, later known as Liberty, which was affiliated to PIE, the pedophile information exchange. Then there's former British prime minister, Theresa May, who thinks pedophiles should be allowed to adopt children too. When you study the patterns of this topic, it seems there is a larger plan behind it all. Why is it so important to legalize pedophilia? Why is having sex with children so important? Any psychologist can tell you how harmful it is for children to have sex at a young age, and that consent is a very dangerous concept, as pedophiles often tell their children they are simply demonstrating just how much they love them. Sex is then confused with love. The child cannot comprehend the subsequent feelings of pain, shame, anger, and fear. The secrecy put upon them is hard to deal with. All of this results in great trauma. Why then would a society push pedophilia down our throats? Bit by bit, step by step, normalizing it so that we grow to the idea instead of reject it? Why create a society of traumatized people? Why are pedophile logos used in children cartoons, Disney movies, candy and ice cream, child protection centers, adoption agencies, in business, and in politics. Meet Sheila Jackson Lee, member of the House of Representatives, proudly wearing her young boy lover ring. What is going on here? Let's follow a lead. Check this out. This still image appears in a video clip of a band called Sexstainers, and this is where it gets interesting. They played at Comet Ping Pong, a restaurant on Washington, DC. Best known for its pizzas, ping pong tables in the basement, high profile clients such as Hillary Clinton, Andy Obamas, and a conspiracy theory called PIZZAGATE. More about which in a bit. Meet the owner of Comet Ping Pong, James Achilles Alafuntas. When Alafuntas started his restaurant in 2,006, he didn't have much according to himself. Yet in 2012, only 6 years later, he was named as one of the 50 most powerful people in Washington, DC. That fascinates me. You don't become that powerful by running a pizza place. So who exactly is James Lofantus? He portrays Comet Ping Pong as a family friendly restaurant. Yet his tweets and those posted on his Twitter account are controversial, to say the least. It's clear that all of Fantas loves art. Comet Ping Pong often displays the work of artists with a very specific taste. This is the work of Arrington de D'ionizzo. Not a big Trump fan, Why is this on the walls of a child friendly pizza place? Alafantus loves a good party. Now here's a picture he wishes he never posted. Meet his party friend, miss Summercamp. What else? He had a love affair with David Brock, political consultant and founder of Media Matters for America, a progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitor, analyze, and correct conservative misinformation in the US media. In other words, an organization for censorship. Brooks Media Matters received $1,000,000 from none other than George Soros back in 2010. Propp also found it correct the record with the sole purpose of censoring all negative reports on Hillary Clinton on social media. Censorship once again. So James Alephantis is definitely a lead we must follow. What else do we know about him? He is best friends with the political top of the US. He is closely connected to the Podesta brothers, John and Tony Podesta. John Podesta is quite a hotshot in American politics. He was White House chief of staff to president Clinton, counselor to president Obama, and chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. Tony Podesta is a political lobbyist and art supporter. He and his ex wife, Heather, collect the work of, for instance, the Dutch artist, Marti Phelings. Fascinating, to say the least. They are also great admirers and buyers of the work of Patricia Puccini. And what about the work of Dilrzyna Georgievich that actually adorns the podesta's living room? This is Louise Bourgeois. Her work is prominently present in Tony Podesta's mansion. This piece is called Arch of Hysteria. It greatly resembles the work of Jeffrey Dahmer, a serial killer who lied to dismember his victims and leave them in a somewhat awkward position. And then there's the most interesting work of Kim Noble, a survivor of severe trauma in early childhood, which left her with 13 older personas. Her artwork shows the horrific things she experienced as a young child, like torture and rape. Her work was exhibited in Comet Ping Pong, our child friendly pizza place. Now I don't know about you, but this makes me sick as a dog. The more I studied Pizzagate, the more I realized this was quite likely conspiracy fact, not theory. What kind of a pizza place exhibits naked, abused, tortured, raped, and even dead children on its walls? What kind of man becomes one of the most powerful people in Washington, DC serving pizza? How come the political top of the US, the podestas, the Clintons, and even Obama, president of the US at that time. How come they all want to spend time with a sick perv like Eliphantus? I think I know. For a while I thought the name Elephantus was fake. This man was way too powerful to come from an ordinary family. Could all of Fantas be a French bastardization of Jean Lazon Fonds? I love children. But then, Samanans pointed out he could well be a Rothschild. After some digging, I came across an interesting twist in the Rothschild family tree, starting with Evelyn Achilles the Rothschild. His middle name kinda gives it away, doesn't it? He was born in Buffalo, New York in 18/86, and died in World War 1 in 19 2 years before he died, his illegitimate son, Louis George, was born. But as he wasn't married, his son inherited the name of his mother, Aliphantus. The boy grew up and married Helen Rapace and had 2 sons, one of which is Achilles Louis Alephantis, the father of our very own James Achilles Alephantis. His mother's name is Susan Reed Shoemaker. So his middle name, Achilles, takes him all the way back to his great grandfather, and even further back to his great great grandmother, the Italian Marie Peruggia. Her father's name was Achilles Peruggia. In short, James Achilles Lophantus is a real, genuine, full on Rothschild. That explains his power and his friends. It explains his close proximity to the Clintons, just like his uncle and aunt, Evelyn and Lynn de Rothschild. So are we to believe that our political leaders simply enjoy pizza and sick art? Is that it? What is it with pizza, anyway? Why is it so sexualized? What's with the Best For Pizza pedophile logo? Which, by the way, was quickly changed the moment Pizzagate became an item. Is it all just a coincidence that the Podesta emails, revealed to the public by WikiLeaks in 2016, contain countless pizza related words, such as cheese, hot dogs, pasta, walnut sauce. When you actually know what those words mean, which is common knowledge in the sex industry, these emails suddenly become shocking. Is this why Hillary deleted 33,000 emails for which she is currently scrutinized? Does that explain what Obama meant when he ordered $65,000 worth of hot dogs and pizza, flown in from Chicago to the White House in the middle of the night for a private party? Is that why Hillary emailed Obama, warning him he needed to be more careful next time? The hot dogs can come, but if you make a spectacle out of it, that will be our downfall. And I think it would be wiser to restrict this activity to our predetermined locations. Really? For a few hot dogs? Isn't it weird that these security camera pictures of children lying on ping pong tables in the basement of common ping pong are shown on the walls upstairs? Who the hell is watching them? And why does their website have a super secured backdoor to a secret division where you can order pizza pictures for absurd prices? This screenshot was made public by a hacker. It's in low resolution, so I will read out loud what it says at the bottom. This month, we have 5 fresh pizzas for your enjoyment. We also have 4 surviving pizzas from last month's session. All are on sale at an extremely low price, as they are in poor health and not expected to survive. So a requirement is that you finish eating your pizza after your session. This month's special includes a 30% discount on severe torture. Each image below is available for $1,000 in fine print. Why are they talking about kill rooms, murder, and rinsing it off when you're done? What the hell is going on here? To tell you the truth, at this point in my research, I experienced what we call cognitive dissonance. What I found out was so contrary to my belief system that I wanted to dismiss my discoveries. It just could not be true that the people we trust, the ones we vote for, were so evil. I simply could not handle the facts. How could people so charming and intelligent be part of the child trafficking pedophile ring where children were tortured, raped, and killed for pleasure? Or as I would later find out, for something even more horrific? I felt like I'd ended up in a nightmare. All I wanted to do was dismiss it all. Couldn't it just be all coincidence that the Clintons and the Obamas and Trudeau, beautiful, charming Trudeau, have surrounded themselves with their own friends? If their friends are all pedophiles, that doesn't mean they are. Right? And maybe they don't even know about their friends' sexual preferences? I mean, I know Bill Clinton's healer, the Brazilian John of God, was recently arrested for keeping sex slaves when he made pregnant time and again. I know he admitted to selling the babies for 1,000 of dollars and killing the slave mothers after 10 years of giving birth. I know the main whistleblower in this case suddenly died private island of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. I know he was on the pleasant Genesis 26 times, together with other sex offenders like Evans Facey, who was recently arrested for multiple rape accounts, among others, with young boys. But that doesn't make Clinton a sex raging animal. Right? I know he was investigated for the rape of a young boy by Jenny Moore, a former police officer who informed the FBI and the Department for Homeland Security, after which he suddenly died in a hotel room. But that doesn't make Bill Clinton a murderer, does it? I decided to do more research. I needed more supporting evidence. I went back to the artwork. I was intrigued by the bathroom or swimming pool or whatever it was. Where was it? When this appeared on ACHAN, I knew I was on the right path. Not just me, but thousands of anon searched for it and found it. It actually existed. Do you want to know where it is? Come with me to part 6. The swimming pool and the artwork bought by the pedestals actually exists. It is the subterranean swimming pool at Biltmore Mansion in Asheville, North Carolina. This was the home of multimillionaire Gloria Vanderbilt, who recently passed away at the age of 95. Here we have Gloria and her 2 sons, Anderson and Carter Cooper. Carter committed suicide when he was 23. Anderson is a well known news reporter for CNN. Why does Gloria's swimming pool appear on paintings of tortured children? Is it a coincidence that the little boy so strongly reminds me of Anderson Cooper, Gloria's son? Could there be a connection between her swimming pool and the entertainment with young children for the elite as mentioned in the infamous Podesta emails? Anderson Cooper, son of Gloria Vanderbilt, world renowned and award winning reporter for CNN. He was caught overdoing it from time to time, making things look much worse than they actually were. But, hey, maybe he's just a bit of a drama queen. At least they led to some funny responses on social media. The question remains, is it okay for a media outlet to deliberately broadcast such exaggerations? Is that honest broadcasting? Is it okay to influence the public with headlines such as these? Is it okay for the Dutch news network NOS to show a twisted version of an interview by BBC's John Sweeney asking Putin about the killings in the Ukraine, where the NOS edited the original interview so that Putin seems to walk away, ignoring Sweeney. Yet the original interview, which can also be found on the Internet, shows Putin taking his time answering the question. Is it okay for several American news outlets to accuse Trump of raping a 13 year old girl together with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted pedophile? Is it okay that there's a deafening silence from the mainstream media now that the flight records show that it wasn't Trump, but Bill Clinton who joined Epstein at his parties with underage girls on Audie Island? Is it okay that Trump's words about MS 13 gang members being animals were totally twisted, obviously on purpose, so that he seems to refer to immigrants being animals? Do you remember the little boy from Syria sleeping between the graves of his parents? That too was staged and broadcast on purpose as to manipulate the people into yet another war. The boy was paid to lie there. I don't know about you guys, but this is not okay. It's not okay to fake white helmet saving a wounded man right after a bombing only to have a selfie taken. That's deceit. It's not okay to lie to the public about Syria and the alleged chemical attacks so that yet another war can be justified. For months, we were lied to by the mainstream media. Remember this poor little girl? You probably will, for she was used 3 times for 3 different rescue missions in 3 different months in 2016. I find that shocking. It is not okay to fake attacks on women and children to trigger an emotional response that justifies the invasion of yet another foreign country. I find it horrifying to see the well designed deceit of Western people who watch and trust the news. Do you remember this one? I could go on for hours with examples of fake news, but I think this is enough, for now at least. I'll give you 2 more to digest. In 2015, during a presidential rally, Trump imitated reporter Serge Kovaleski, whom he had caught lying. It concerns an article from 2,001 in which Kovaleski wrote about people cheering the fall of the twin towers. When Trump quoted the article in 2015, Kovaleski backed out, saying he didn't remember writing the article. Well, the article could easily be found on the Internet and Trump called out Kovaleski for his lie. But the mainstream media seized the opportunity and used these headlines, Trump mocks the disabled. Kovaleski suffers from but that does not cause that weird movements Trump made. On other occasions and in exactly the same way, Trump had imitated senator Jim Mattis, presidential candidate Marco Rubio, a general, and a bank manager who all got away with lies. However, as Mattis Rubio, the general, and the bank manager were not handicapped, They were of no use to the mainstream media. Kowalewski's handicap, however, went around the world convincing everybody that Trump looked down on the disabled. And I must confess, I too fell for it. Then last but not least, for 2 years, the mainstream media kept pushing the liberal agenda on Trump and the alleged Russian collusion. Whereas on March 23, 2019, the Mueller investigation officially ended, and nothing was found. After 2 years of doing everything they could to take Trump down, they found absolutely nothing. Trump was cleared, yet the mainstream media kept repeating something has to be wrong with this president. Trump's official innocence is completely hushed up, just like they didn't say a word about the countless pedophiles that were arrested under Trump. Total radio silence. From the beginning, Trump has been warning us about the mainstream media as the number one enemy of the people. And the more I study the subject, the more I understand that Trump is actually correct. The mainstream media uses its power to steer the public into a desired direction. The spreading of death information is nothing new. Back in the early 19 fifties, the CIA set up operation Mockingbird, a large scale program in the US with a sole purpose of manipulating news media for propaganda purposes. Leading American journalists were recruited into a propaganda network. In other words, the secret service determined what was going to be on TV and in the news. Has anything changed? No. Apparently not. German whistleblower, Udo Ulfkotter, high profile journalist for the Frankfurt Augermeiner, stated in front of the camera that he felt deeply ashamed to have consistently lied to the public for over 25 years. Ulf Gothe died of a heart attack shortly after in January 2017. The illusion of choice. We think there are so many generals. How could they all be in on it? Well, that's easy. This shows you who owns whom. Do you see it? There are only 4 companies. CBS seems to be independent, but it's owned by the same billionaire as Viacom. When you give people the illusion of choice, they believe they are free. And if you want to find out why the mainstream media pushed the liberal agenda down our throats, all you have to do is follow the money. Who made major contributions to Hillary Clinton to support her work and the liberal agenda? That's right. CNN, NBC, News Corporation, Turner Broadcasting, Thomson Reuters, Newsmax Media, Time Warner, Viacom, Comcast, HBO, AOL, Hollywood Foreign Press Association, Public Radio International, Public Broadcasting Service, Huffington Post Media Group, Carlos Slim, the largest shareholder of The New York Times, James Murdoch of 21st Century Fox, Judy Woodruff, co anchor and managing editor of PBS NewsHour, Howard Stenger, former president of CBS, George Stephanopoulos, ABC News chief anchor and chief political correspondent, Maud Zuckerman, owner of New York Daily News and US News and World Report, and the Washington Post, owned by Jeff Bezos of Amazon, well known for its censorship of quite a few books on controversial topics. Censorship is one of the greatest dangers to a democracy and to freedom of speech. 3 more major sponsors of Hillary Clinton are Google, Twitter, and Facebook. Google and its YouTube are highly active in the field of censorship just like Twitter and Facebook. It will come as no surprise that pro Trump posts are among the most censored ones, as are posts of critical thinkers and researchers, and anyone who dares question the official narrative of events such as the ones I presented in part 1. Are never censored. Doesn't that make you wonder? Remember correct the record, a media matters for America? Those are the kind of censorship companies that work behind the scenes of Facebook, Twitter, Google, and YouTube to delete anything that opposes the liberal agenda. And guess what? Correct the Record is now promoted by AFAZ, the global activist network that I once thought so highly of. Afars was cofounded by Res Publica and move on. Res Publica received $250,000 from George Soros. MoveOn got 1,600,000 from Soros. Afaz's founding president and executive director, Rickon Patel, has consulted for the Rockefeller Foundation, the UN, the Gates Foundation, and the International Crisis Group with Soros as chairman and Frank Dutra as CEO. Remember our friend with the pedophile logo from part 4? Afaza's cofounder is Tom Periello, former Virginia congressman, best buddies with Obama, and executive director of the Open Society Foundations of George Soros, one of the main parties behind the notorious and destabilizing migrant caravan invasion. It will come as no great surprise that Afar strongly opposes president Trump. This is what we call controlled opposition. Like I said, censorship is dangerous. The so called fact checkers are dangerous. Snopes is one of them. Set up by a couple from San Fernando Valley, David and Barbara Mickelson. The couple fell out. Barbara accused David of spending $98 on prostitutes, which is probably true as he divorced Barbara and married call girl and porn star, Elisa Young, aka Erina Brynn, who is now Snopes' administrator. Snopes' only fact checker is Kim Lycabria, also known as sex and fetish blogger, Vyse Vixen. That, my friends, is Fack Jagger Snopes. There are no researchers, no investigators, no lawyers, no documents to support their findings, and they are strongly politically biased. Yet they are generally accepted as fact checker. I find that most shocking. Do you get the picture? Operation Mockingbird never ended. John Podesta, one of the key suspects in the Pizzagate scandal, got his own column in the Washington Post, writing about politics and policies. How the hell is he supposed to give an objective view of Trump, his worst enemy? John Brennan, head of the CIA till 2017, now serves as senior analyst for NBC News and MSNBC. And as a Cooper work for the CIA before he became a news anchor. According to himself, it was only an internship when he was 19. But I wonder how many young men are approached by the CIA for an internship. Anderson did not even have the proper education to be offered a job. Yet in no time, he became the face of CNN. The secret services still decide what the people are supposed to think and believe. If they want to invade yet another country, they will use the mainstream media to make you believe that that particular country needs to be freed of a terrible dictator who kills his own people. The real reason for the invasion will quite likely never be known to the public. It'll probably have to do with oil or the installment of yet another Russia bank. But, hey, who cares? It was in the news that they freed those 4 people from their dictator and that democracy was bestowed upon them. And if it's in the news, it's true. End of story. Well, no. It's not. If the media coverage is controlled by secret services, it seems only logical to me to focus on the things they refuse to cover or ridicule. Number one topic that comes to mind, Pizzagate. Debunked by the mainstream media like nothing else. Let's continue with a bit of additional research in part 7. This is Marina Abramovic, a Serbian performance artist who likes to display the limits of the body and the possibilities of the mind. She pioneered a new notion of identity by focusing on confronting pain, blood and physical limits of the body. Let's have a look at her work. In 1996 Abramovich introduced spirit cooking. A cookbook with essential aphrodisiac recipes. Some of which call for the mixture of fresh breast milk and sperm milk. When WikiLeaks posted this, it definitely had my attention. Spirit cooking later took on the form of dinner party entertainment for her donors and friends. The link to cannibalism is obvious. Abramovich furthermore made her appearance in the leaked Podesta emails. Why am I not surprised? I discovered this photo of Abramovich and John of God. Exactly. The very same Brazilian healer who was recently arrested and charged with multiple accounts of abduction, abuse, rape, child trafficking, and murder. The very same personal healer of Bill Clinton. This picture is particularly interesting for the Dutch viewers. Before Willem Alexander became king of the Netherlands, his mother Beatrix was on the throne. She frequented performances. On this particular occasion, she wore a brooch that seems to be a pizza slice. Now this may be far fetched, but let's see. Meet Maxima Zorghietta, born in Argentina and now married to our king, Willem Alexander van Oranen Nasal, and daughter of the late Jorge Zorrieta, who served as cabinet minister during the so called dirty war of dictator Jorge Videla. Maxima had 4 sisters and 2 brothers. 1 of her sisters is Dolores, an artist who came to the Netherlands in 2000 and 5 to exhibit her work. The exhibition was called Love Romance. Have a look for yourself. Is it just me, or is this insane? To me, this looks like an outcry for help from a severely traumatized woman. In June 2018, Maxima's younger sister, Inez, was found dead in her apartment, hung with a scarf from a doorknob. Doorknobs have proven to be lethal for quite a few people lately. In other words, not suicide, but murder. Was Ines Sorigieta about to spill the beans on the cabal? Is that why she was silenced? Could this be true? Let's have a look at some other doorknob victims. Number 1, Lorenz Scott, fashion designer and former girlfriend of Nathan Rothschild, one of the world's most wealthy families. According to a long time lover, Mick Jagger, Lauren was not suicidal. Number 2, Chris Cornell, lead singer of the rock band, Soundgarden and audio slave. According to his family, he suffered from depression due to being sexually abused as a child. He and his wife founded the Chris and Vicki Cornell Foundation to support children suffering the consequences of abuse and neglect. He and his best friend, Chester Bennington, were working on exposing an elite pedophile ring. Cornell was also the main financial backer for the documentary, the silent children, about child sex trafficking. After he died, the project was canceled. According to his family, Cornell was not suicidal at the time of his death. Interesting detail contradicting the suicide theory was the blood on his head and on the ground. Was Cornell killed by a stroke on the head and strangulation by means of his exercise belt? Number 3, Chester Bennington. Best friend of Chris Cornell a lead singer of Linkin Park. He died 2 months after Cornell. Bennington also suffered from depression due to being sexually abused as a child by a friend of the family. According to some sources, that friend was John Podesta, key player in pizzagate. And when you look at the striking resemblance, Podesta could well be Chester's biological father. When Chester was 9 years old, his father abandoned the family after finding out the boy was not his son. Was Podesta both the pedophile family friend and the biological father of Chester Bennington? Is it a coincidence that the logo of his band looks like a broken version of the young boy lover symbol? Number 4, Tim Bergling, a k a Avicii, world famous Swedish DJ, musician and record producer. According to the first news about his apparent suicide, Bergling was said to have hung himself from a doorknob. Later on, the narrative was changed into self inflicted cuts with a broken wine bottle that led to heavy and lethal bleeding. It took almost 2 weeks for this official narrative to be published. Berglings 2015 video clip for a better day clearly and shockingly shows child sex trafficking. At the end of the video clip, Bergling turns out to play the part of the abused boy, now grown up and ready to take revenge on his abusers. Did he actually experience these horrors in his childhood? Was he murdered for bringing this out into the open? Bergling's family believes he did commit suicide, yet his girlfriend expressed her disbelief. Number 5, Annabelle Nielsen, ex wife of Nathan Rothschild, who also lost Lorenz Scott through hanging. Remember? According to a family, she died of a stroke. But according to friends, she was found hanging by a scar from a doorknob. Number 6, Aaron Swartz, computer programmer and activist for Internet freedom, for which he founded demand progress and read it. He died after hacking into MIT and J store. Schwartz was arrested and charged with computer fraud. However, 1 week after his alleged suicide, it became apparent that Swartz had leaked the hacked documents to WikiLeaks. One can only speculate as to the contents. Number 7, Kate Spade, American fashion designer. Spade led delegations to Haiti for the no ceilings initiative of the Clinton Foundation, aimed at the global support of women and girls. Haiti is one of the main places on earth for child trafficking, and we've already seen the involvement of the Clintons in part 4. What did Kate Spade know that led to her death? Why did her husband, Andy, appear in public 2 days after her death wearing a rat mask? Was Kate about to rat to betray the Clintons? Was Andy Spade forced to wear the mask as a warning to others who just might rat? Number 8, Anthony Bourdain, Celebrity chef, TV presenter and author. Bourdain openly criticized Hillary Clinton on multiple occasions. He spoke out strongly against globalization and deeply hoped Henry Kissinger would be called out for the war crimes he committed. Bourdain had been to pedophile Ireland, Haiti to shoot an episode for his TV program, no reservations. A month before his death, he posted a tweet about the wrath of Hillary Clinton he had experienced. Followed by this one, even more outgoing. And then Bourdain died a sudden and unexpected death. So what are we dealing with here? The world has obviously gone mad. We've already seen the normalization of pedophilia. Now the elite takes it a level higher, worshiping the devil and normalizing cannibalism. You don't believe me? Watch this. Is this really the sign of the devil? Oh, yes. Meet Anton LaVey, founder of the church of Satan, giving the exact same sign. The same church of Satan Chelsea Clinton is so fond of. The upside down pentagram containing the horned one plus the upside down cross, it's all there. So, we have Satan? We have blood. We have body parts. We have cannibalism. Statues of Moloch, an expression of the devil, are now watching over several American cities. And only recently, a new one was placed in Rome. Let's go back to the Dutch royal family and see how far this insanity goes. You've already met king Willem Alexander and his beautiful Argentinean wife, Maxima. They both have very interesting fathers. Maxima's father, Jorge Zorrieta, was minister of agriculture in the regime of general Jorge Videla, a military dictator who ruled Argentina from 1976 till 1981, and who was responsible for the kidnapping, torture, and murder of an estimated 30,000 people. As part of the Fidela government, Sorghietta must have known about the atrocities. But he claimed not to have been aware of the so called dirty war. In 2 1,006, Zorogieta was discredited once again during a lawsuit against the top of the bunker republica for money laundering the profits of drugs and weapons trade. Sorghietta was on the board of directors between 86 and 96, the time of major deals between the bank and drug cartels. But once again, he came out clean due to bribery and corruption. His daughter, Maxima, didn't meet Willem Alexander until 1999 in Spain. At least, that is the official narrative, which is weird as the Dutch Feuer family had known the Zorikietas for generations. Why did they lie about that? Prince Bernhard, vin Alexander's grandfather frequented Argentina and the zurriquietas even before world war 2. Both families had a holiday mansion in Bariloche, a ski area with mostly German visitors and inhabitants. As a matter of fact, Bariloche was a Nazi den where many assessors and Nazi scientists went during operation paperclip. I was taught in school that the Nazi leaders were all convicted in the Nuremberg trials that justice was served. But did you know that only 10 Nazis were hanged and only 7 went to jail? That's it. The big Nuremberg trials, only 17 of them. Did you actually think like I did? They all got what they deserved. Well, think again. They had way too much knowledge. Most of them were welcomed with open arms. NATO, NASA, they all lost them. Many assessors, scientists, and engineers did not go to the US, but to South America instead, especially after their retirement. Argentina was very popular among them, especially the inhabitable Patagonia, where they were safe from post war Nazi hunters. Bariloche was such a place. Big Nazi names such as Erich Priebka, responsible for and actively participating in the killing of 335 Italian men and boys in 1944. Reinhard Copps, SS officer who helped many Nazis escape to Argentina after the war. Josef Mengele, the angel of death from death camp Auschwitz, where he performed horrific experiments on children. And Adolf Eichmann, one of the major organizers of the holocaust, all lived in Bariloche. Later, the favorite ski location of the Dutch royal family and the Zorrietas. Both king Willem Alexander's father and his grandfather were German. Both were part of the Nazi movement. Claus von Ambersberg, Willem Alexander's father, was a member of the Hitler Youth. His parents were active participants in Hitler's n s d a p. When journalist Wim Clinkenberg wrote an article about Prince Claus's Nazi past in Panorama Magazine of December 1965, Dutch prime minister Kalls personally interfered. He was tipped about the contents of the article in which clear evidence was presented that completely contradicted the official story about our prince's past. Karls ordered all 420,000 magazines that had only just been printed to be destroyed. Incriminating evidence, documents, letters, etcetera, against the Dutch royal family, were stolen from journalist Glinkenburgh's home. The people of the Netherlands were not to find out about the dark side of the royal family. King Willem Alexander's grandfather, Bernhard von Lippe Biesterfeld, was member of Hitler's NSDAP, the SA, and the SS, where he served Himmler's elite cavalry, the equestrian SS. During the Nuremberg trials, the equestrian s s was the only division that was not prosecuted. So that Bernhard von Lieber Biesterfeld, by that time, married to the Dutch queen, Juliane van Oranje Nassau, would remain safe from prosecution and from scrutiny. Do you realize how much power the Dutch royal family must have had to accomplish this? I wonder how many Dutch people know about this. I was told in school that Bernard was a war hero, that he served the British secret service, that he even wanted all 200 duchess executed at the end of the war. So many lies. At his wedding with queen Juliane, the orchestra was asked to play the Nazi song of the NSDAP. The director of the orchestra, Peter van Anreuil, refused as did some of the musicians. But Bernhard made it happen. The song was played. Many guests offered the Nazi salute, and the musicians who had been willing to play the song were later rewarded with a medal. During the war, Royal Shell gave millions of tons of crude oil to Hitler for free. A deal set up by Prince Bernhard. The crude oil was used for the Nazi tanks to invade and conquer the Netherlands. The people of the Netherlands were handed over to the Nazis by their royal family. Most Dutch people are completely unaware of this. Even though these facts are quite easy to find when you start searching for the truth, we've just never been told. Bernard was corrupt to the core. He accepted a major bribe, $1,100,000 from Lockheed in 1976. He was scrutinized for being president of the worldwide fund for nature and the prince Bernard Nature Fund while being a passionate hunter and killer. More about Bernard's hunting parties in a bit. Bernard was a notorious womanizer. The maids of the royal palaces were terrified of him and knew very well they had to keep their doors locked at night. He had several illegitimate children, 2 of whom he officially acknowledged, Alexia and Alicia. Juicy little detail is that Alicia's mother was the daughter of Nazi test pilot, Hannah Reich and Werner von Braun. That's right. The Nazi rocket scientist who was welcomed by the US in 1945 during operation paperclip to continue his work for NASA. Werner von Braun and Bernard both had served in Himmler's cavalry, the equestrian SS. They went way back. In 1952, Bernard visited his old buddy, Werner, and took advantage of his daughter and left her pregnant. After that, he was no longer on speaking terms with the mother of his illegitimate child, as he put it himself. Bernhard was a much more powerful than most people realize. Before, during and after World War 2, he cherished and maintained his contact and friendships with other SS officers, both in Argentina, where he went on so called trade missions for the Netherlands and in Germany, which has always been denied by the royal family and the Dutch Central Intelligence Agency. Bernhard also founded the Bilderberg group, where and industrial leaders gather once a year to discuss well, nobody really knows as it's highly secretive. You can only become part of this exclusive group upon invitation. When prime minister, Lutz tried to enter the conference in 1977, he was literally thrown out. There's one thing all researchers agree on, the Bilderberg group is definitely cabal. There's one more thing Bernhard was known for, and this is where it gets really dirty. It's the main reason why I put so much emphasis on our royal family, and this is something everybody needs to know. Come quickly to part 8. The more I studied the hidden side of the European royal families, the further I fell down the rabbit hole. Until I stumbled upon something extremely dark. I will spare you the gruesome details. They are too horrific, too sickening. I urge you to do your own research. Google the names you're about to hear, Read and listen for yourself, and make up your own mind. This is where Pizzagate returns to the story. Pizzagate is not just a problem, it's a global problem. Let's get down to the real definition of Pizzagate. Worldwide, children are stolen and sold to elite pedophile rings. They are tortured, raped, and murdered as part of satanic ritual ceremonies. The murderers then drink the children's blood and they eat their flesh. The blood of children who were severely traumatized before they died contains adrenochrome. A natural drug produced by the pineal gland in the brain. Adrenochrome is the highest value drug in the world. The god these people serve is Satan. It's not a god of love and mercy. Whether or not you believe in the existence of Satan is not relevant. They do. And according to each and every eyewitness who has the guts to step forward, PizzaGate is real. Remember Mark Gibson's statements? He was ousted for not wanting to participate. He witnessed it though, and he is one of the very few who dares to speak about it. Personally, I think it's a miracle that he's still alive. Adrenochrome is real. It is the ultimate drug. This is what you look like when you take it. And this is when you no longer have access to it. Thanks to president Trump. There was not as much time between these photos as you may think. Not many children survive the satanic ritual ceremonies. The very few ones that do were not meant to be killed. They were there to sexually serve the elite. Royalty, shikes, top politicians, bankers, judges, church leaders, worldwide. Most survivors were born into satanic cult families. When you study all of the survivors' accounts, you will see they have a lot in common. The same description of the atrocity afflicted upon them, the same names of perpetrators, and the same elite they belong to. The problem, however, is that these survivors are not believed by most people. It's easier to assume that they're insane or attention seekers than to face horrible truth. Attention seekers than to face horrible truth. Furthermore, not many survivors dare to step forward. They are simply too traumatized. I spent countless hours listening to their horrifying accounts. I read police reports, and I am convinced these people are not crazy. They are not attention seekers nor liars. Their stories are consistent. Please do your own research and find out about the following victims and or eyewitnesses. The Dutch, Anna Marie van Blijenberg, Touss Nijenhuis, Anneke Lukas, and Ronald Bernard. The Irishman, Richard Kerr. Brother and sister, Gabriel and Elisa Dearman from the UK, the American, Sarah Ruth Ashcroft, and the Australian, Fiona Bonnet. Whenever a child sex offender was arrested in the Netherlands and its neighboring Belgium, think Mark Dutroux, Roberts Michelsons, they all swore they were supplying children for a large elite network. They were not believed. They were presented to the public as lone wolves operating on their own. Most viewers will now, once again, experience some more cognitive dissonance. But, hey, remember when the first reports emerged about the sexual abuse of boys and girls by Catholic priests and nuns? At first, nobody believed it. People were too shocked to handle it. But now, so many years later, it is common knowledge to most people. The church paid 1,000,000 of dollars to its victims in an effort to silence them. We now have the evidence. We have numbers, statistics. People have grown used to the idea that priests, bishops, and cardinals raped children on an enormous scale. And if you think the popes washed their hands in innocence, you're in for a big shock. Now I realized that satanic cultural frames of babies and children is a step further than sexual abuse, but I can assure you that more and more victims will soon speak up. And step by step, people can work their way through their cognitive dissonance so that soon, we'll be able to save these children. Where do these children come from? How come they can simply disappear without a trace, without worried parents who report them missing? They come from orphanages, children's homes, youth detention centers. Some are homeless. Many are refugees fleeing wars. These children are stolen, sold. We're talking the fastest growing trade here. According to the survivors, not only the Dutch, but also the British royal family are heavily involved in all of this. Back in the 19 eighties, a major controversy arose when it became clear that prince Charles was a very close friend of Jimmy Savile, a notorious pedophile. Not only Charles, the entire royal family loved Savile as the prime minister, Margaret Thatcher. Savile was named by many victims and was said to have been extremely violent and cruel. He was never prosecuted and died a free man. Then there's the interesting close friendship between prince Andrew and convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein held several young women as sex slaves, hiring them to his elite friends such as prince Andrew. The royal family has always denied the allegations. And there's more. In 2015, a video emerged shot by a Swedish tourist, Buckingham Palace. It shows a naked boy climbing out of a window of the palace using a bedsheet. The boy cannot hold on and falls to the ground. The mainstream media tried their utmost best to debunk the video. Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the video, and the Metropolitan police said they had no reports of the incident. Now I don't know what it is for the royal family, but something's definitely weird. Have a look at prince William's wife, Kate, right after giving birth in 2018. Why on earth would she pick a dress that is identical to the one in the horror movie, Rosemary's baby, where Rosemary gives birth to Satan's child. What kind of an insane coincidence is that? According to the satanic ritual abuse survivors, the pope's too were and are heavily involved. Pope Francis, pope Benedict. Like I said, they do not wash their hands in innocence. On the contrary. Both pope Francis and the Dutch, Prince Bernhardt, loved hunting parties, according to the survivors. Once again, I will do you the great favor of sparing you the disgusting details, but it boils down to this. The hunting parties took place in secret in forests, most of which belong to royal estates in several European countries. The participants, all part of the before mentioned elite satanic pedophile cult, would hunt down children, rape them, murder them, and cut off their genitals as a trophy. In February 2013, former pope Benedict, Josef Ratzinger, was prosecuted and sentenced by default for crimes against humanity by the international tribunal into crimes of church and state. Rasigna's crimes included child trafficking and protecting priests who had raped children. Is this why he stepped down even though being a pope is a nomination for life? Interesting little detail is that lightning struck Saint Peter's twice, only moments after his resignation. The same verdict followed for pope Francis. One accusation was added, complicity in murder in Argentina. Others who were also prosecuted and sentenced for crimes against humanity with a British queen Elizabeth Windsor and her husband, prince Philip, former Canadian prime minister Harper, and 27 other dignitaries. Whether or not this will lead to arrests, time will tell. For now, both the pope and the royal family enjoy immunity. The international tribunal into crimes of church and state extensively investigated the case of the rape, torture, and murder of 50,000 native children in Canada. The United Church of Canada, the Anglican Church, and the British royal family played a major role in this case as did the Dutch royal family who fled to Canada to be safe from World War 2. As far back as 1942, an investigative journalist of the Canada Gazette thoroughly studied the case and came to the shocking conclusion that 50,000 native children had disappeared from 80 Canadian Indian Residential Schools, and that 30 1 mass gravesites have been found inside the school grounds containing the remains of children. Now as shocking as this may be, it is nothing new. On a regular basis, mass baby and children's graves are discovered, often near nunneries. In some cases, we don't know exactly what happened. In other cases, we do know due to forensic evidence and the eyewitness accounts of survivors. Mel Gibson was right when he said that satanic cults with child sacrifices are nothing new. It goes way back into history. For 1000 of years, children have been murdered to please Satan, Lucifer, Baal, Moloch, or whatever you wanna call him. I found many paintings of child sacrifice in Catholic churches during my own research. It's part of human history, but that doesn't mean it's okay. We all know about the aspects and the human sacrifices, and we can deal with that for it's old. But until recently, I was not aware of any of this. I'd never heard about Pizzagate and satanic, Luciferian cults with child sacrifice. I thought it belonged to the past, to the dark ages. Well, I guess we're still living in the dark ages. All of the satanic cults are connected worldwide. People at the highest level are only at the highest level because they participate. And once you're in, you're in for life through blackmail with pictures and video footage taken in secret. And some don't even need blackmail. They simply thrive on the pain and suffering of others. Some names have been named. Others will follow soon. The people will be shocked to the core when this comes out. Let me give you one piece of advice. When the video of Hillary Clinton and her right hand, Huma Abedin, raping, torturing, mutilating, and killing a little girl comes out in the open. Do not watch it. You will not sleep again. There are certain things I will not share with you here simply because they are too horrific. Like this shower torture of a child by John Podesta. Search and find it for yourself if you like. I wish to wake people up, not traumatize them. The same goes for the red shoes. You wanna know what they're made of? Do your own research. I'll give you a small hint. The tradition of red shoes for the elite goes all the way back to the Byzantine tradition when kings would wear them as symbols of bloody martyrdom. The video, by the way, was found on the confiscated laptop of Anthony Weiner, the ex husband of Humber Aberdeen. It was stored together with thousands of other files in a folder called life insurance. Talk about blackmail. Wiener, by the way, was sentenced to serve 21 months in prison for sending sexual texts to a minor back in 2017. Oh, and the good news is Wiener's laptop has officially been accepted in court as evidence. I can assure you we'll be hearing a lot more about its contents very soon. Now what happens when you try to make any of this public? Either your TV career ends right there and then or you get a heart attack. Or your plane pressures, or you end up dead in a hotel room. Or you are found with a bullet in your back or you commit suicide. And guess what? I haven't even shown you the real top of the pyramid of power yet, just the visible top. Did you think the, the, George Soros, the government leaders, even the royal families, did you think they are the top of the 1%? They are not. There is a very dark order above them all, making puppets of everybody else, even of kings and queens. Ever heard of the Jesuit order? Did you know that there are 3 popes instead of 1? Ever heard of agenda 21, of its sequel, the depopulation program? This is so big, it does not fit in this first documentary. It will form a film of its own, which I promised to present in the very near future. What I wish to give you now is hope. After all of this misery, it's time for some light. And the good news is there is plenty of that. Come with me, finally, to the good news in part 9 and 10. When CU arose on October 28, 2017, little did we know that a new era had started. Something big, something massive started unfolding before our very eyes, but most people remain completely in the dark. Through the cue drops, hints, clues, and questions were planted like seeds, waiting for humanity to be picked up, researched, and unraveled. Bit by bit, we, the people, woke up. Using other means than the mainstream media, the QAnon started communicating with each other through Facebook, Twitter, and other social media. The same social media that was set up by the cabal to monitor the people 247 were now used to find each other and to spread news and findings. There was no stopping us anymore. People in France went out into the streets in yellow vests, showing president Macron that they no longer complied. What started off with small groups evolved into mass protests. For over a year now, tens of thousands of people have been gathering every Saturday, not just in France, but in Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Bulgaria, Turkey, Poland, Hungary, Taiwan, Australia, Iraq, Israel. The mainstream media tried to make people believe it was just a fading phenomenon, but the people saw through their lies. George Soros then intervened in his own special way. He paid his people to mingle with the yellow vest and start riots. The ever successful way to a group of protesters with peaceful intentions made them look like vandals and aggressors. Saurus' rats attacked the police, but this strategy didn't work either. His rats were not very smart. They forgot to put a yellow vest, and in the heat of the fight, they shouted, Perez, Perez, Antifa. Then they forgot who they were supposed to attack, so they went for the yellow vest as well. Got scared. He told the French police to strike down the protests with all means necessary. But the police officers took off their helmets in solidarity with the yellow vests. What else could the cabal do? Use extreme violence. Army forces were deployed. Snipers were put on rooftops to shoot at the yellow vest if necessary. Thousands of people got injured. People died. France is in the middle of a civil war, but the mainstream media remained silent. 23 yellow have died for believing in a better world. South America too shows massive protests where people demand their corrupt governments to step down. The world is experiencing the biggest revolution ever. The worst nightmare of the cabal has come true. The people have woken up. And contrary to other revolutions that humanity went through in the past, this revolution is one of knowledge, understanding of how things are run by the elite, and the willingness to work together to create a better world. A revolution of the people can only work when there is help at the top. That help is never there in the past, but now there is. That is what makes this revolution different. We have an ally at the top, an ally that we refer to as Q. Q is a group of people, not an individual. The intel Q provides is top level. I believe Q comprises of Donald J. Trump and some of his most loyal army generals. Without the help of the army top, the plan that is unfolding would never stand a chance. But there's more to Q than meets AI. I am convinced there are some secret components that will be revealed soon. President Trump and the entire q team are working out a plan that has been in the making for the past 20 years. A plan so all encompassing, it took this long to calculate every step, every move to perfection. Every possible outcome of each and every step was thoroughly mapped out, leading to the next optimal move. We are talking probability calculation at the highest level. How do we know? Because q made predictions of events that We, the People, could never have foreseen. President Trump gave clues in his speeches that pointed to events that were about to unfold, but most people didn't even notice them. The mainstream media made fun of them, but the Cuban nuns recognized them and realized just how brilliant Kyu really was. Let me give you a few examples. In the middle of a press conference in November 2017, Trump stopped a few times to take a sip of water from a small plastic bottle. It seemed weird, completely overdone. He repeated this a month later in the middle of a talk about national security. He held the glass with 2 hands like a child. The mainstream media went hysterical, claiming the president was either retarded or suffering from some degenerative disease. The, however, knew immediately that he was pointing out something. The water bottle contains Fiji water. Fiji water is bottled on the Isle of Wakanda. In 1973, Wakanda was bought by a Canadian businessman, David Gilmore. In 1996, he founded Fiji waters. In 2016, Claire Bronfman, heiress to the multibillion dollar leg of fortune, bought 80% of Wakanda from Gilmore and financed the setup of Nexium on the island. Exactly. The sex cult run by Keith Raniere who branded his initial into the women that he kept on the island as sex slaves, who were lured in by sweet face Allison Mack, the small deal actress. The ball started rolling, arrests were made, and in April 2019, Runier was found guilty on all charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking. Some of his victims were minors. Claire Brumsman and her sister, Sarah pleaded guilty on all charges, as did Alison Mac. More incriminating things will come to the service soon. Nexium donated a large amount of money to the Clinton Foundation. Claire Bronfman was CEO of a company called Bronfman Rothschild, as was Evelyn Rothschild and his wife, Lynn. Remember them from the previous episodes? Isn't it fascinating how the same key players keep popping up? There's one more disturbing thing about this case which involves the Dalai Lama. In May 2009, the Bronfman sisters organized an event with the Dalai Lama in Albany. There was a lot of criticism towards the Dalai Lama. How could he connect his good name with a sex cult? But he decided to go anyway. 10 days after the event, the Dalai Lama Trust was founded. According to its tax filings, the trust received $2,200,000 in donations in its 1st year. Was the Dalai Lama bored to connect himself to Nexium? According to an inside Nexium member, this was indeed the case. The Dalai Lama's office and the sisters denied the allegation. Now that this has come out into the open, it would be nice if the Dalai Lama would at least explain why he went along with the sex cult or apologize. But instead, he blames Trump on ethical behavior. Now why was the Fiji case so important? Nexium will soon turn out to be just a small fish compared to what's coming. Think crimes against children, sex trafficking, and satanic child sacrifice. Think big names like the Clintons, the Obamas, and the Podestas. What Trump did was he started off with a case important enough to be presented to the people, but small enough not to completely shock them. He chose Nexium to let the public are used to the major offenses that are about to be revealed. This is what we call red pilling the people. A term coined in the movie, the matrix. Do you want the blue pill or the red pill? If you choose the red pill, you will be shown the truth, and there's no way back. Here's another example of Trump's brilliant strategy. In June 2017, Melania boarded the presidential plane on a way to visit a youth detention center with Mexican migrant children who have been separated from their parents. She wore a coat with the text, I really don't care. Do you? It was a strange choice for the coat wasn't fashionable at all, and the text was quite provocative to say the least. Once again, the mainstream media went into a frenzy, but the knew the Trunks were giving yet another clue. The coat turned out to be a Zara product. An investigation made clear that Zara made use of slave labor. As a result, Armancio Ortega, founder and CEO of Zara, resigned 6 months after Melania's action. Yet another clue that was being given by Melania was the fact that these children were not separated from their parents, but saved from child traffickers. More than 8 a half 1000 CEOs resigned over the last 2 years, many for unclear reasons, just like you have predicted. Was Trump in de draining the swamp like he promised? One of q's crumbs that was repeated several times was we have the server. It quite clearly refer to Hillary Clinton's server. The one she tried so hard to destroy before it would be used against her in a court of law. But how did the Q team lay their hands on it? The clue was given in Helsinki, Finland, when Trump met Vladimir Putin on July 16, 2018. Trump openly asked the audience, where is the server? Where are the servers? They are missing. Where are they? What happened to Hillary's emails? 33,000 emails. They're gone. Just gone. I think it's a disgrace. Remember the scene with the soccer ball? Put in handed Trump the ball and said, the ball is now in your court. Trump took the ball and said, this will go to my son, Beren. He then threw the ball to Melania. What was so special about the ball? Why the big smiles and the twinkling in their eyes? What was going on here? And why did Melania post a tweet with this picture later that year? Many QAnons agree on the theory that the content of the service was inside that soccer ball, containing enough incriminating evidence to put a lot of people in Washington DC behind bars for life. Try evidence for the uranium one scandal, where Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state, and with knowledge and approval of President Obama, gave Russia control of 20% of America's uranium by approving the Rosatom deal. The purchased Eurasia, owned by Frank Justra. Our friend with a pedophile logo from part 4. Remember? Justra had right after the Rosatom deal was signed. Why on earth was he too embraced by the Dalai Lama? Why the hell did he get the Dalai Lama Humanitarian Award when he is involved up to his ears in child trafficking? Why did Bill Clinton receive $500,000 for a talk in Moscow right after the Loro's atom deal was announced? Do you know what we're looking at here? Bribery, corruption, pay to play, money laundering, and high treason. This was the real Russian collusion. Oh, by the way, why did Trump say the soccer ball was going to his son, Barron? According to insiders, Barron was extremely intelligent with an IQ of 146. He is said to be incredible with computers, especially when it comes to hacking, cracking codes, passwords, etcetera. Bearing this in mind, I so understand the facial expressions that one fine day in Helsinki. Soon, very soon, there will be arrests. Mass arrests. Everything has been laid out. 20 years of preparations. The CIA, FBI, DOJ, NSA, every three letter agency has been cleared of deep state actors. How can you make arrests when the agencies are corrupted? You cannot. That's why Komi, McCabe, Brennan, and other key players had to go. That's why some of them suddenly stepped down while others were fired. The stage has been set. The world will be in for a major shock. How on earth are people going to respond when it becomes clear that Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, Feinstein, Strzok, Page, the Clintons, that they all tried everything they could possibly think of to impeach the president of the US, we will soon see that it went much further than just spying. It went as far as organized murder attempts. The cabal, the deep state, tried to assassinate the president of the United States on multiple occasions. They tried to force Trump to go to war with North Korea. But after annihilating the cabal strongholds there, he brought peace. They now tried to force him to go to war with Iran, but I can assure you, he will do the exact same thing. Annihilate the cabal strongholds first, and then bring peace. Hugh said it would happen this way. First Korea, then Iran, Israel last. Then there is Obama's high treason. Everything you were told about him by the mainstream media will soon turn out to be false, falsified on purpose. Soon, we will be presented with hard evidence concerning his birth certificate, his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, the extremist party behind ISIS. Pictures such as these will start its service. Obama and the Clintons integrated the Muslim Brotherhood in the American government at the highest level. Remember Huma Abedin, Hillary's right hand? Her parents were directly connected to the Muslim brotherhood, as is her brother. Where do you think that leaves her? Remember John McCain? What was he doing in Iraq? Were the eyes are still full? Why did Trump say they called the 5 most wanted ISIS leaders? Not 4, 5. Did you notice something weird about the flag on his coffin? It was wrinkled. Only traitors get wrinkled flags. It was a code. High treason, death penalty. Did you really believe he died of cancer? Do you still believe Osama bin Laden was the enemy? That he was responsible for 911? That he set up Al Qaeda? Uh-uh. He was a CIA agent before he became the enemy. His American name was Tim Osman, Osama Osman. Did you hear about team 6? The Navy Seals who killed him? They all died 3 months later when the helicopter crashed. No eyewitnesses who might once tell the tale of what really happened. We've been lied to on a scale we cannot fathom just yet. History books will have to be rewritten. America was sold to the highest bidder by Obama, the Clintons, and the Bushes. Do you realize the state of shock people are going to be in when the truth finally hits the surface? Do you understand why Guantanamo Bay has been fully upgraded and expanded? Do you have any idea how many sealed indictments there are waiting for the perfect moment to be unsealed so that arrest can be made? More than 100,000. Many will be prosecuted for treason, some for high treason. High treason means capital punishment, death penalty. There will be chaos and shock, but there will be guidance from totally unexpected mystery guests. This moment in time is one that will make history. One that is unprecedented in the history of mankind. Do you think I'm exaggerating? Find out in our final part number 10. When everything we've seen in the previous episodes is presented to the public with undeniable evidence, people will be in shock. The normal way to deal with shocking information is to first deny it and ridicule the messenger, then get scared, angry, or depressed, and finally, accept it as the new paradigm. This will take some time. I believe we're going to need a spokesperson to convey to the world what happened. Somebody who will be believed by everybody, democrats and republicans alike. That person cannot beat Donald Trump. He will be hated by the democrats no matter how much peace he brings upon them. If I were to choose for the US at least, it would have to be JFK Junior, John John as his father used to call him, loved and trusted by the entire nation, mourned by every American citizen. Too bad he's no longer amongst us. Or is he? When I first heard about the possibility of him still being alive, I thought, oh, god. Not yet another conspiracy theory. But when I did some more research, I started doubting. This is an aerial photograph of JFK's memorial. That's right. It's a cue. Remember this code? It was engraved in the ship bell on JFK's boat. Where we go 1, we go all. JFK was murdered because he wanted to expose and get rid of the cabal. He intended to start with the CIA just like Donald Trump. He too knew that the CIA had turned into an uncontrollable monster that no president or government could restrain, but he had no idea what he was up against. J f k was assassinated. Nobody will ever forget these pictures. John John saluting at his father's funeral. The entire nation mourned. Junior grew up to be a lawyer. He swore he would avenge his father and take Aschylus to court, even if he had to bring down the government as he put it. He ran for the New York senate siege in 1999 as did Hillary Clinton. John would have won by miles. He was born to be the next president of the US, but it wasn't meant to be. On July 16, 1999, his plane crashed into the ocean. There were no survivors. All 3 on board, John, his wife, Carolyn, and her sister, Lauren, died upon impact. Their bodies were retrieved and cremated. The remains were kept in Tiffany blue boxes before they were scattered at sea. The entire nation was in shock. Donald j Trump was in shock. He and John were close friends. When John died, Trump swore he would finish his mission. He promised he would take the murderers of JFK senior and junior to court. He swore to drain the swamp. Could John junior still be alive? Is it possible that he staged his own death knowing there was no way he would survive the wrath of the cabal? The only way to possibly fulfill the mission was to stay low. A master plan was developed, and in the course of 20 years, every single step was analyzed and executed. An entire team was put together with insiders at the top who were willing to give their lives for the course. The annihilation of the cabal and the liberation of the people. They left hints and clues as to inform those who had already woken up to the truth. Trump communicated directly with the people by means of his Twitter account, thus avoiding the corrupted mainstream media. In every speech and every tweet, he used phones for the QAnons to pick up on. He used spelling errors such as kefirfe instead of coffee, referring to a new act about the saving of all social media posts by the president. The act was introduced 12 days after Trump's tweet. He wrote hamburgers instead of hamburgers, referring to people who are below the devil and who commit acts that even the devil would consider evil. He wrote smoking gun instead of smoking gun, referring to the secret perverted orgies of John Podesta and friends. Trump's clumsy behavior showed his victory over cabal key players. Every move, every so called error, every little detail was important. Everything was a communication with the people. Remember when Donald and Melania Trump were welcomed by the Obamas at the White House on day 1 of Trump's What does that remind you of? What does that remind you of? Remember the Tiffany blue coat Melania was wearing? So many references to JFK senior and junior. There's one more clue that John might indeed have staged his own death. In September 1995, he founded and edited a glossy politics lifestyle magazine called George. In this particular edition, the cover seems to be giving a lot of clues. Survival guide to the future? Interesting. Bill Gates on world domination? Okay. Hillary Clinton, Indictment day. Will Hillary get busted? Wow. The lady reappears in the editing room. In the background, there she is. Platform 2020. That's the year of the next presidential election. And then it reads, buckle your chin strap and hold on as George enters the time warp and reemerges in the year 2020. Time warp? Is this John communicating that he will reappear in 2020? If John is alive, would he show himself to the public from time to time? Disguise the cause yet clear enough for the enormous to see? Meet Vincent Fusca, presented to the public as a Trump enthusiast and volunteer at the Trump rallies. Now I know he's not the spitting image of John Junior. Different nose, different mouth, not quite as handsome. But, hey, if they can make Eddie Murphy look like this, everything is possible. Right? Bear that in mind. Vincent Fusca does not seem to have a past. No old pictures, no family tree, nothing. He suddenly appeared. His name means conqueror of the dark. He often wears a fedora hat, very similar to JFK senior. And this I find understand why John would change his appearance slightly from time to time as to give hints to the q andons. But why would a Trump fan do such a thing? Then there's the mystery lady in the audience, always close to Fusca. My. Doesn't that big smile look familiar? What about Lauren, Carolyn's sister? The 2 were very close. Maybe Carolyn didn't want to disappear without her? Maybe she was informed on the plan? And maybe she decided to join them and stay low as well? Could this be Carolyn, presented as Fusca's colleague at the rallies? When q was asked, is JFK Junior alive? The answer was no. But when senior dies, junior no longer is junior. The question should have been, is JFK alive? Where does all of this leave us? With the perfect spokesman when he is needed, and that may be sooner than you think. As soon as the Pfizer documents are released, the sealed indictments are unsealed, and the arrests are made. That's when I expect him to step forward. The world is in the middle of the greatest transition ever. An entire era of suppression for masses is about to end. I doubt if we can fathom the vastness of what is about to be revealed, nor the impact it will have on the world. Think about it. World peace to start off with. That's literally what Trump said to a reporter who asked if he'd be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. The prize will be world peace. Can you imagine a world without war? I don't think we can. We've been led to believe that war is normal, that it's part of being human. Well, it's not. Suppression isn't normal. Poverty isn't normal. There's enough food to feed the entire world. The problem is uneven distribution of means, money, and food. Taxes aren't normal. They're not even legal. Trump has already stated he will get rid of the fed and several taxes, including income tax. As we've seen in part 2, they are illegal, unconstitutional. Can you imagine how much money can be saved that way? Can you even begin to imagine what even distribution will look like? Then there's the impact all of this is going to have on our use of energy resources. I'm sure you've heard of Nikola Tesla, the famous inventor of many beautiful things in the area of electricity, magnetism, and physics in general. An absolute brilliant mind who wanted to share his invention of free energy with the world. This was a thorn in the side of the cabal, who made 1,000,000,000 of profit with oil, coal, and other fossil fuels. Tesla was arrested. His word was stolen. All his inventions were seized by the American government. John Trump, Donald's uncle, was a brilliant physicist, electrical engineer, and inventor. During World War 2, he joined the National Defence Research Committee. In 1943, he reviewed and analyzed the Tesla papers right after Tesla died. That's right. Tesla's inventions on clean and free energy on anti gravity and much more that has been kept hidden from the public because there was no money in it, fell into the hands of Donald Trump's uncle, whom he loved and greatly admired. Guess how that fits in Q's plan to save the world. Oh, and there's one more thing. Take a look at this picture. Doesn't John Trump remind you of someone? Somebody very important in the truth movement? Julian Assange. Could he be John Trump's son? Donald Trump's cousin? Let's put it this way. Nothing surprises me anymore, and it sure makes sense. And bearing in mind all the magnificent inventions of both Nikola Tesla and John Trump, I wouldn't be surprised either if they had invented a time machine. After all, if you can bend space, which was definitely within the reach of Tesla, then you can change time. If quantum physics is correct, if you can really jump from one time line to another parallel one, you can time travel, change certain things, and go back without people noticing a thing. Unless you leave clues behind, like a magazine that seems totally out of place. Like cue predictions of specific outcomes that couldn't possibly have been foretold, not even with the use of quantum probability theory. Is that how q works? With direct knowledge of the future through various timelines, probability waves? Is that why Trump is still alive and even missile attacks have been counted? Is this how q manages to predict exact poll numbers and events to the minute and second precise as encoded in the q drops and the q clock? Is this how the mysterious author, Ingersoll Lockwood, was able to write a book in 18/89, and another one 4 years later about a young Barron Trump and his adventures through a space time portal guided by a man called Don, the master of all masters? All current topics are in the books. Dirty politics, an unexpected candidate, a man called Pence, Russia, even the exact location of the Trump Tower. 18/89? The mysterious author also wrote a book about the last president. Furthermore, his name appears on a watch, the Ingersoll Trump pocket watch. The same sort of watch used by the white rabbit in Alice of Wonderland, a tale often referred to by Hugh. Time travel? The world as we know it is about to end. What is awaiting us is a new era of peace, liberty, equality, and harmony. The dawn of the golden age as described in each and every source text. I have grown to fully trust Don, master of all masters. He may seem rude, clumsy, and silly from time to time, but he has earned my trust in the past two and a half years when I especially followed his every move. He is a genius, a 5 d chess player, a man with a huge heart. There will be a relatively short bridge period between the 2 in which people can adjust to the new paradigm and its energies. I don't think there will be much chaos. Everything is ready to be implemented. A new banking system without interest, new ways to educate our children, a new medical system without poisonous addictive chemicals, and so on and so forth. All we have to do is be patient. Watch everything unfold. Trust the plan. Do whatever we can to help others wake up and remain focused and ready, ready to assist, ready to help create a beautiful new world. Some people will wake up faster than others, remain calm and in service to war. Or as q once put it so beautifully, as long as you sleep, we will fight for you. Where we go 1, we go
Saved - May 29, 2024 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A series of posts raises questions about a group's control over various aspects of society, including culture, media, politics, and finance. The posts suggest that this control has led to manipulation, subversion, and the suppression of dissenting voices. They also discuss the group's influence over elections, wealth distribution, and the banking system. The posts raise concerns about the impact on native populations, historical cover-ups, and the control exerted through the global vaccine rollout. The posts call for awareness, unity, and the sharing of information to challenge this alleged control.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

“WHAT IF?”🧵 PLEASE RESHARE! WHAT IF a tiny group of people had disproportionate control of culture, news,social media, politicians, banking, tech, finance, your nations’ policy, & married all presidential children? Would it concern if they had subverted & enslaved your people? https://t.co/N7RlhiXtYf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews are powerful, rich, and control the media. We should not apologize for our strength and influence in public debate. We have contributed greatly to this country's success. Use our strength for peace without apology, as peace comes through strength. Thank you for listening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jews are too powerful. We're too strong. We're too rich. We control the media. We have too much this. We have too much that. And we often apologetically deny our strength and our power. Don't do that. Don't do that. We have earned the right to influence public debate. We have earned the right to be heard. We have contributed disproportionately to the success of this country. Never ever apologize for using our strength and our influence in the interest of peace. And if you need a biblical source for it, just remember the psalmist who said, Hashem owes. God will give the Jewish people strength, owes. And then, only then, only then will God give the Jewish people peace. Peace will come for the Jewish people and the Jewish nation only through strength. Never apologize for using your strength for peace. Thank you. I look forward to a couple of question.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF every aspect of your culture was so manipulated that your television, radio, smartphone, teachers, & even parents became completely immersed in the massage of a machine orchestrated by this group, that even basic history was used to deceive. You’re living in Orwell’s 1984 https://t.co/2sTAV4XPNq

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF we all knew this so intrinsically true that comedians joked about it right to our faces without ever connecting the basic dots as to “they” were? What if THAT GROUP’S MEMBERS even acknowledged it in front of you? https://t.co/OF9ZZgPQgJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a list of influential people in various industries, noting the high number of Jewish individuals. They mention how different people interpret this list, some seeing privilege, conspiracy theories, or intellectual opposition. These interpretations can lead to anti-Semitic conclusions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: List of the 50 most influential people in given industries, the 50 big mockers in media, in finance, in other places. And the intention of the piece was to say, look, they're all white men, or they're mostly white men. But I looked at it and thought, oh shit, there's so many Jews. And David Duke looked at it and said, look at all those Jews. And Louis Farrakhan looked at it and said, look at all those Jews. So concepts like privilege or or or conspiracy theorizing or just the general campaign against heterodox forms of of thinking, against against intellectual difference and disputation, none of this is anti Semitic on its face. All of it leads in an anti Semitic conclusion. Right. So the 50 most influential people in
Video Transcript AI Summary
The wealthy business interests control everything, not politicians. They own land, corporations, and media. They lobby for self-interest, not critical thinking citizens. They want obedient workers, not informed individuals. The system benefits them, not the people. It's a rigged game, but many are unaware or indifferent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The real owners, the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. They're they're they're irrelevant. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls. They got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media media news all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They they spend 1,000,000,000 of dollars every year lobbying lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interest. That's right. You know something? They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don't want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And now they're coming for your social security money. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club. By the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when They tell you what to believe. All day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. The table is tilted, folks. The game is rigged, and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF as a result of their control over #politics, elections became meaningless? After all, if both your liberal and conservative options had their allegiances purchased by this outside force, does it even matter who wins an election? If both sides are compromised... https://t.co/tkViyoD2lo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel's control over American politics is highlighted, with claims of buying Congress, the presidency, and the media. The speaker criticizes the American media for not condemning Israel's actions, accusing them of being owned by Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu is labeled as the world's most evil man, and Americans are urged to reflect on their country's actions. The speaker expresses disappointment in America's current state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What it tells you is the control that Israel has over the American domestic political reality. Israel controls everything. We're not a sovereign state anymore. Israel literally has bought the American Congress and bought the American presidency, and bought the American establishment. Where's the American media? You know, I was always one of those people that sort of got a little uneasy when people would put up the, you know, the list of, you know, media media moguls in America and talked about how many of them were Jewish and how many had links to Israel. I'm like, oh god. That's a little anti Semitic, don't you think? Not anymore. Because the silence of the American media is deafening. The American media is standing by and allowing Israel to commit genocide, and they're not doing a damn thing about it. This should be at the top of everybody's. This should be the lead story. They should be calling out the hypocrisy of the Biden administration. They should be condemning Benjamin Netanyahu. They should be condemning Israel, but they can't because Israel owns them. Israel owns everything. And so America is going to be sacrificed on the altar of Zionism, on the altar of this Israeli state. This is all about assuaging the ego of Benjamin Netanyahu, the world's most evil man today. There's nobody in the world more evil than Benjamin Netanyahu, and he's an American friend. This is Christmas. I hope I marry every American listening looks in the mirror and pukes because that's what you should do when you look at your reflection. Because you're an American. You stand for nothing except the depth of so many people. We suck as a country. We have become so far off course. It's not even funny. Look. There's nothing the put it

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that group owned the media so thoroughly that this control was always overlooked & dissents shut down? Instead other “villains”, like white supremacy, were propagandized to deflect from that control to keep people fighting one another rather than their hateful oppressors https://t.co/dVfccsDoVv

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that group had constructed cultural Marxism as a means to drive culturally subversive agendas (porn, feminism, racism) that align with communistic ideals as a way to destroy the heritage & family dynamics that built the healthy, productive society they aimed to destroy? https://t.co/VvMCX9yLVB

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF that control extended across social media platforms they owned (Zuckerberg & Elon both) and ALL conservative voices were merely controlled opposition that shaped public opinion without ever allowing the sheep to notice who really controlled their minds? https://t.co/lZqOtNkJPv

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a center in Silicon Valley run by a former Facebook executive, with software engineers and data scientists monitoring various platforms like Google, YouTube, Meta, Twitter, Reddit, Steam, and Amazon. We collaborate with companies from Apple to Zoom, including Twitter since its inception. We engage with both the old and new regimes, even discussing with Elon Musk. The ADL holds daily meetings with social media and other companies to regulate speech. The ADL is not a civil rights group but an intelligence organization working for a foreign entity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're gonna wanna hear this. We opened a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017, and the woman who runs it, she's the next Facebook executive. I have software engineers and data scientists working at ADL. We're monitoring all this stuff, and we're working with all the platforms, by the way, Google and YouTube and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple to Zoom, we work with all of them. Okay? That's relevant because we've been working with Twitter now for real since it was founded. We work with the old regime, working with the new regime. Like, I'm talking to Elon, and we're trying to work with them. Speaker 1: He's literally bragging out loud about how they have daily meetings with all the social media companies. Sorry. Not even just social media platforms. He said Zoom. Private conversations in order to censor speech they do not like. And let's just be a 100% straight up. The ADL is not a civil rights group. It is an intelligence organization operating within the United States on behalf of another country.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am deeply connected to Israel and seek citizenship to stand with its people. My support is not just words, but actions. Despite challenges, I choose to align with those fighting for the right to live. My request for citizenship is rooted in standing for what is right and true. Israel and America embody this spirit. I took my children to Israel after visiting Auschwitz, teaching them the importance of history. May Israel remain a symbol of hope and resilience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Know why I was born. But there is something about the state of Israel that connects deeply to me. To have the privilege to stand with the Jew is a tremendous honor, spiritually. So I wanna read a letter that I, wrote that I am sending to the state of Israel. To prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the honorable officials at the state of Israel, in this moment, I have chosen to ask you for citizenship in the state of Israel. I have nothing to offer but my voice of support, and some might say that my support might be more valuable as an independent voice. Perhaps they're correct. But my request for citizenship is not about words. It is about deeds. Why, one might wonder, would I want to embrace a heritage and identity that is so ruthlessly hunted down again and again? Yet it is precisely during such moments that we must choose to stand. I anticipate no privileges or exemption from the state of Israel. I instead yearn to align myself with those willing to rise, to fight, and sacrifice for the fundamental right to live. Is this not what both Israel and America embody? In closing, my desire for dual citizenship does not stem from any expectation of gain, but from a deep rooted belief in standing with what is right and true. 10 years ago, I took my children to Israel for the first time, but we first visited Auschwitz in Poland. I told them, you cannot understand Israel without the bible or Auschwitz. May Israel remain an eternal flame of hope, a beacon of resilience, and a testament to the enduring human spirit. I don't know why I was born.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF through that control of power, they had monopolized egregiously excessive levels of the wealth of your nation while, through nepotism & bigotry, sharing & passing it on only to people “in their club” How does 2% of the US population make up half of the billionaires? https://t.co/5P4KtADQIm

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if, with these riches, these individuals positioned themselves to take control of ALL companies to ensure they could insert their chosen while destroying any opposed to their world views? After all, if you can’t become financially independent, you’re forever enslaved. https://t.co/w2kMn9Lvz9

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF great minds, like @noble_x_x_ & others below worked to explain the significance of this problem which your media intentionally obfuscated?

@noble_x_x_ - Noble

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard collectively manage $20 TRILLION of assets …the entire GDP of the U.S. is only $23 trillion Now here's how BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard control you with those assets First, we need to understand that owning a stock means you own a portion of the corporation the stock is issued based on And with that ownership comes one very important right: the right to vote your shares to determine what the corporation does Shareholder voting within a corporation is exactly as it sounds: you vote on certain issues and proposals put forth by the corporation. The more shares you have, the more votes you get — so if you own 30% of all the shares of the company, you get 30% of the votes. Results of votes are generally decided by simple majority. Pretty straight forward, right? Now what gets voted on at these shareholder meetings? The voting determines the major changes to how the corporation will maintain or change the way it interacts with the world around it as well as how the corporation is managed internally These votes can determine big things, to name a few: -diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives -executive compensation -board of director's policies -the political policies of the corporation However hands down the biggest decision made by the shareholder vote is who sits on the board of directors. The board of directors decides: -the objectives and goals of a company -the management and senior executives of a company -the company policies (including political policies) -brand image and advertising Yes — there is some overlap between what the board of directors does and what the shareholder vote determines. Responsibilities differ from company to company Now that we have the basics out of the way, how does voting shares of a corporation play in to BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard (I'll call them "BSSV" from now on) controlling you? Let's first look at how each of BSSV's ownerships are structured (all three are basically structured the same) What BSSV generally does is pretty simple: they buy stock shares of a specific company (Apple, Tesla, etc.) and package those stock shares with similar stock shares in to something called an ETF or a Mutual Fund. Then they sell a piece of resulting pool of those stocks to you so you can own a bunch of stocks without having to buy each of them individually (this is simplified but the basics hold true) For instance, let's say you want to buy technology companies but don’t know which specific company you want to buy or you can't afford to buy a bunch of different companies. In that case, BSSV would simplify the process for you by buying stocks of a whole bunch of different tech companies that they then package in to an ETF or Mutual Fund which you can then buy shares in allowing you to get ownership to all those companies at a fraction of the cost and effort! And these bundles can be created with any industry, sector, or with any other group of companies — from tech to oil to the entire S&P 500 So it seems like a win-win, right? You get to own a bundle of a bunch of different stocks you couldn’t otherwise get access to and BSSV gets a very small fee for helping you get that exposure They seem like such nice guys, right? How on earth could this be sinister? Not so fast — when you buy these stocks through BSSV in ETFs and Mutual funds you give up one very important thing: you give up your right to vote at the shareholder meeting for each of those individual companies You give up the right to choose the board of directors who determine the course of actions the company will pursue and you give up the right to vote on those political and policy decisions directions the company will take But most importantly: YOU GIVE THAT VOTING RIGHT TO BSSV “So what, BSSV can vote a few shares of a company? There must be way more shareholders out there that also vote” For this, I'd ask you to do an experiment. Pick any major company. Now google who its largest Shareholders are The largest shareholders will almost always include or be composed of BSSV. Of all the stocks in the S&P 500 at least one of the members of BSSV is the largest shareholder in 88% of the companies “But on average they only collectively own around 15% of most of these companies, that's not 50% control” True but a 15% difference in voting for board members or policies where most other shareholders are indifferent or uneducated on the policies (thus their votes are closer to a 50/50 split) is enough to sway almost every item that's voted on “Well at least the three of them must have differing views? They all must compete for different shareholder vote outcomes, right?” Wrong The unique thing about BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard is that their own largest shareholders are: Each Other So they all decide each other's boards of directors and all control each other's shareholder votes. Then once BSSV's own boards are chosen they choose the boards of the companies they control Now how is this control actually exerted? What are the manifestations of it that actually impact us? I'll keep this succinct so this doesn't run too long but corporations exert control over our society in a number of ways On the social front this means BSSV can control almost every intersection of our lives with corporations. Our news, our social media, our financial institutions, our cinema and television, our retailers, our clothing stores, and even our food are all subservient to BSSV and the boards of directors they appoint In the political landscape this control can be exerted through campaign contributions, lobbying, PACS, issue advocacy, regulatory capture, think tanks, revolving doors, trade associations, policy development, and campaign advertising amongst others (to name a few) This is also why every corporation appears to be move in lock-step in their support of things like ESG investing, Black Lives Matter, and other social causes: because behind the scenes BSSV purposefully elects boards that champion their values and beget their interests The players on each board are different but their ideologies are the same…because their ideologies are BSSV's ideology For many years now BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard have controlled almost every aspect of our lives without us knowing Let's break that cycle (@patrickbetdavid does a good analysis in this video as well but imo disregards the importance of voting rights as the mechanism of control) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mvh4o6x3-GQ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF, speaking of wealth, your nations entire banking system had been architected, not to protect its people, but to forever enslave them as a nation into endlessly covering the costs for the ultra rich & foreign governments? Perhaps like our federal reserve #economics https://t.co/QtUNhBpVXn

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that tiny group of people used that control to shape opinions of the masses in favor of policies extremely detrimental to the native people of that country? To vote against their own wages & the protection of their culture via endless immigration of poor, violent migrants https://t.co/8T9bV1zHEy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Wir werden in einer multikulturellen Stadt leben, die von verschiedenen Ethnien lebt. Es sterben mehr Deutsche als geboren werden, aber wir machen ein Experiment, eine monokulturelle Demokratie in eine multiethnische umzuwandeln. Unsere Gesellschaft wird sich radikal verändern, und das ist gut so, besonders in Richtung Rechts. We will live in a multicultural city with many different ethnicities. More Germans die than are born, but we are trying to transform a monocultural democracy into a multiethnic one. Our society will change drastically, and that's a good thing, especially towards the right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wir werden in einer Stadt leben, in der es einfach ist, dass unsere Stadt davon lebt, dass wir ganz viele verschiedene Ethnien haben, ganz viele Menschen, dass wir eine super kulturelle Gesellschaft haben, meine Damen und Herren. Speaker 1: Jedes Jahr sterben mehr Deutsche als geboren während. Das liegt zum Glück daran, dass die Nazis sich auch nicht besonders verfehlt werden. Zum Zweiten, dass wir hier ein historisch einzigartiges Experiment wagen, und zwar in einem multiethenische, monokulturelle Demokratie in einem multiethenische zu verwandeln. Das kann klappen, das wird glaub ich auch klappen. Aber dabei kommt es natürlich auch zu vielen Bewerbungen. Speaker 0: Unsere Gesellschaft wird sich ändern. Unsere Stadt wird sich radikal verändern. Ich bin der Auffassung, dass wir in Und ich sage Ihnen noch ganz deutlich: Gerade hier in Richtung Rechts, Ich sage Ihnen noch ganz deutlich, gerade hier in Richtung Rechts, das ist gut so!

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF.. that group was so bold with their control that they celebrated it right in your face encouraging “their people” to embrace, continue, and further this monopoly on power... would THAT concern you? What if that same group celebrated white extinction & genocide? https://t.co/qdt4TAfC5x

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that Jews are influential worldwide because it is God's will. They mention the Torah as proof, stating that Jews will always stand out in every nation. Despite being a small community compared to Americans, Jews are prominent in various fields like politics, with examples given of Jewish involvement with Trump, Biden, and Obama. The speaker highlights the historical pattern of Jewish influence in different countries and urges against hatred.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Jews run the show in the world, not because they want, because that's what God wants. And it's written in the Torah that the non Jews admit that it's the word of God. If they didn't admit, what's the proof? But in the Torah, it says that in every nation you will be, you will always be the highlight of the place. Even though we have very small community compared to America, 300,000,000 Americans, 5,000,000 Jews. No comparison. But the Jews are everywhere. Politics. All the assistance of Trump, Jews. All the assistance of Sleepy Joe Jews. Obama, Jews, everyone around them, reformed Jew, conservative Jews, Chabadnik, this, Convent. It's all somehow. Same thing was in Spain. Same thing was in many different countries. Instead of hating the
Video Transcript AI Summary
Europeans will pay dearly for their ignorance, as Islam aims to eradicate Italy and Christianity. This war is seen as necessary for Israel's protection. The rise of Islam in Europe is viewed as a positive development for the Jewish people. The prophecy foretells that Israel will ultimately prevail and dominate the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vous allez le payer très cher les européens, mais à point, vous n'avez même pas notion de quoi on parle. Et vous n'aurez pas aussi. Quand l'Italie disparaîtra, quand Edom, c'est pour ça que le q g de la chrétienté qui vient de Essave se trouve là-bas, quand cet endroit-là disparaîtra et c'est ce que veut faire l'islam il s'occupe l'islam c'est le le ballet d'Israël sachez-le. C'est-à-dire que je vous jure qu'on fasse son travail et on voit pour Dieu le problème. Quand il va débarrasser tout ça et que le va va revenir chez nous alors c'est. Cette guerre-là dans le monde dans lequel on vit elle est nécessaire pourquoi est-ce qu'elle est nécessaire parce que l'un va utiliser l'autre pour ne pas qu'Israël rentre en guerre Akadosh Barch, Tabarshi Molaad, il est le Krafat Saïm, va provoquer que Ischmael se lève contre Issa. Donc ce que vous êtes en train de subir en France, en Europe, fait tellement peur, ça devrait être pour nous la plus belle nouvelle de notre histoire juive. Enfin, on commence à s'y accrocher. Enfin, on commence à réaliser ce que les sages nous avaient prescrit avant. Ce que je vous ai dit tout à l'heure c'est marqué dans le sien viendra que quand Edom, l'Europe, la chrétienté sera totalement tombée. Je vous pose la question, c'est une bonne nouvelle que l'islam envahisse l'Europe C'est une excellente nouvelle, ça lance dans une machine. Speaker 1: De grandes hécatombes se prépareront dans le pays d'Edom Rome c'est un jour de vengeance pour l'éternel une année de représailles pour la cause de. Tout ça, c'est marqué dans le prophète. Speaker 2: Et ce sera le monde juif qui va grandir et grandir et que ce serait la nation qui elle va gérer le monde. La terre d'Israël, la catastrophe d'autrui va la tirer le monde entier, ça sera Israël et Israël, ça sera Yeru Shalaïm. Et la seule personne qui va dominer dans le monde, ce sera d'être attaché. Avec le macher, cette pierre qui elle va grandir, sera le peuple d'Israël.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF these same patterns had emerged previously in other nations resulting in conflict: & expulsions as the same turmoil and poverty had been pushed on generations of the past? WHAT IF we were seemingly repeating predictable cycles?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

You live in Weimerica 2.0 🧵 Almost a century ago, post-WW1 Germany was in rubble; its people & culture impoverished & humiliated. Its infrastructure & economy was destroyed by a corrupt minority “group” which monopolized their banking, politics,& media Sound familiar? READ ON: https://t.co/Ry6RQr3i7g

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Weimar Republic in Germany was marked by high unemployment, hunger, and despair among the people. Suicide rates were high, with over 30% unemployment leading to desperate actions. Birth rates were low, and anarchy and chaos prevailed. The disarmed and hungry German population felt helpless as communists took control of parts of cities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Unemployment, hunger, and a hopeless future distinguished the Weimar Republic to the German people. Suicide rates were high. Unemployment topped 30% as desperate Germans committed suicide. Birth rates were extremely low. Anarchy and chaos was in the air. There was nothing the disarmed, humiliated and hungry German people could do about it as communists even seized parts of many cities. In 19

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that group, to cover up these historical patterns had constructed elaborate, demonstrably dishonest stories to deflect any and all critiques? WHAT IF those stories contained indefensible plot holes? (THIS IS CLEARLY JUST A QUESTION NOT A STATEMENT)

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

👀QUESTION👀 Why would Anne Frank's step sister Eva Schloss claim that photographic evidence of the liberation of Auschwitz was all “fake”? She states film crews went back MONTHS LATER and staged it Does this not make you question this piece of “history”? 🔎 @TonightsGame https://t.co/nsI6vc4iC8

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions the liberation of all camps in Poland, not just Auschwitz. They point out that photos of the Russian liberation of Auschwitz lack snow, which was actually present. The Russian embassy confirmed that the photos were taken after the fact when cameras were available. The speaker emphasizes that the photos do not accurately depict Auschwitz's liberation due to the lack of snow and the presence of well-dressed individuals and children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And only Auschwitz. They liberated all the camps in Poland, and that is really not known. And something I wanted to point out to you, you know, there are many pictures about the Russian liberating Auschwitz, and there's never any snow. And the snow was honestly that high. Mhmm. And so I have some connection with the Russian embassy, and I was there once. And I said, something puzzles me. Those photos are fakes because there's no snow. And they said, well, yes, they are not fakes. But when the army came, they didn't have cameras. They didn't photograph. So only much later when they realized we should have pictures of it, they took pictures Right. Like you see now. But this is definitely not in Auschwitz and not the liberation of ours. The the There were not that many people with clothes and children and no snow. Right. Fascinating. So I only Auschwitz.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that “history” was seemingly merely a projection to cover up their prior wrongdoings and to obscure truths about their aspirations for world domination? What if terms they created, like “the final solution”, were entirely, intentionally misattributed?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

THE FINAL SOLUTION🧵 As genocide in Gaza is being compared to the “evil NAZIs”, it’s time we explore some unusual & inconvenient truths from WW2. Buckle up, this’ll be uncomfortable For starters, did you know, historically,Jews had been expelled from 100 nations? Why? READ ON👇 https://t.co/qa9d8YG3NA

Video Transcript AI Summary
For centuries, Europeans and Jews have struggled to coexist, with Jews being expelled from over 100 nations. They were granted full rights but allegedly exploited and corrupted host nations, leading to conflicts. Jewish supremacists often attribute these issues to antisemitism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For centuries, Europeans and Jews have had problems living together. The Jews have been expelled from over 100 nations before. This expulsion was not something new. Every single nation with the Jews were given full rights and privileges. They had exploited and morally corrupted the host nation, defiled the Gentiles, and then created uproars against themselves. The Jewish supremacists have, of course, always been able to put a blame on quote unquote antisemitism. The National

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that ideology was once put in place under the rule of that group only to result in the worst recorded #genocide in history? A genocide most are completely ignorant to as it’s not taught in schools or propagandized by #Hollywood - perhaps due to aforementioned control?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM🧵 Little to NO education is given on the origin of #communism or its inseparable bond to Zionism. Time to fix that in an emotionless fashion. No animosity intended We must begin with Moses Hess, the father of #Zionism #Palestine #israel #Gaza_under_attack https://t.co/LnXddAgI06

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 19th century, Moses Hess introduced communist principles and laid the groundwork for Zionism in his book "Rome and Jerusalem." He advocated for a Jewish ethno state in Palestine, despite the Arab majority. Hess believed in a race struggle between Aryans and Semites, with Jews emerging as superior. He promoted eugenics, racial purity, and a future Jewish state. He also criticized Christianity as the "religion of death" and predicted a war in Europe involving Germany, Italy, and Austria.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the middle of 19th century, Moses Hess formulated the first written principles of communism. In 18/62, Hess or the communist rabbi as he was called, wrote the book Rome and Jerusalem in which he laid the foundations for a Jewish nationalist movement called Zionism. In the book, he called on the Jewish people to become separatists and to prepare for the creation of a future homogeneous Jewish ethno state. Palestine would be occupied by the Jewish people, but the big problem was Palestine was at this time 19 to 95% Arab. Hess argued that international Jewish bankers would help in this realization of stealing the land from the Palestinians. Hess suggested in his book that one last race and class struggle was being developed between the Aryans and the Semites. In this fight, has predicted that the Jews would stand as winners and the Europeans as losers. The Jews would stand superior over all of the peoples and because Jews had preserved their racial purity over the centuries, it would give them a leading role in the world. Hess essentially promoted eugenics and racial hygiene for the Jews and talked about a future Jewish ethno state. He also referred to Christianity as the religion of death. Fascinatingly, he predicted a future war in Europe with Germany, Italy, and Austria involved as part of a race struggle. Most success was

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that group has commit MULTIPLE genocides, all driven by the same ethnic hatred and a belief of racial superiority? https://t.co/RheYZ3WBqB

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF that group was almost universally in control of a global vaccine that was rolled out and coerced into the arms of the masses by controlled politicians & media? What if that vaccine was now resulting in endless illnesses & deaths for all BUT THOSE IN THAT GROUP? https://t.co/y7u6Pnha5M

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the fight against COVID-19, Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla, a child of Holocaust survivors, played a key role in developing the vaccine. His Jewish heritage and support for Israel are notable. Over 2.5 billion Pfizer vaccine doses have been distributed worldwide. For his contributions, Dr. Bourla received the 2022 Genesis Prize, known as the Jewish Nobel Prize. The pandemic continues, but Dr. Bourla's efforts have made a significant impact in saving lives globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the global fight against COVID 19, the Jewish people who make up a tiny percentage of the world's population have had an outsized impact in the difficult battle to protect lives as scientists. Chief medical officers, and top health care officials. Yet the contributions of one extraordinary person tower above the rest. That extraordinary person is Pfizer chairman and CEO, doctor Albert Bourla. Doctor Bourla led his team to deliver a COVID 19 vaccine in record A child A child of holocaust survivors from a Greek Jewish community destroyed by the Nazis, he's proud of his Jewish heritage, is active in holocaust remembrance and education, and a strong supporter of Israel, which was the first country outside the US to receive the Pfizer vaccine and the antiviral pill. The pandemic is certainly not over, but the world is infinitely better off with doctor Borla helping lead the charge to save lives with more than 2 and a half 1000000000 Pfizer vaccine doses already distributed. Because of doctor Borla's extraordinary contribution to humanity as the world battles the worst health crisis in 100 years, Doctor Albert Bourla has been selected as the recipient of the 2022 Genesis Prize, the Jewish Nobel Prize. Thank you, and congratulations, doctor Borla.
Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID-19 targets Caucasians, Black people, and Chinese. We must ensure everyone has access to tools to combat the virus, not just those who can afford them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID 19 is targeted to attack, Caucasians and and, and, black people. The people who are most immune are asking us to choose and, and Chinese. Speaker 1: But also reminded of us when we have these weapons, these weapons. Speaker 0: These weapons Speaker 1: our these these tools, we must find ways that they reach all and not only those that they can afford.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that same group used historical atrocities like slavery & the Holocaust to justify endless hatred of the host whites while hiding their involvement in precisely those injustices? What if THEY were the ones who commit genocide in WW2 and enslaved the majority of Africans? https://t.co/5vW5pS1U0G

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews played a significant role in the slave trade in Brazil, Suriname, Curacao, Barbados, and Jamaica. The two largest slave shipments to the US in the 18th century were on Jewish-owned ships. Aaron Lopez, a prominent slave ship owner, was Jewish. In Newport, Rhode Island, all rum distilleries during the slave trade era were owned by Jews. Census data from 1830 shows a higher per capita ownership of slaves by Jewish households in the US compared to white gentiles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. It is true as we now know that the Jews were the major element in the slave trade in Brazil in the 1600, in Suriname, in Curacao, in Barbados, in Jamaica. Yes, it is true, as we now know, that the 2 largest single shipments of slaves coming into this country in 18th century were on ships owned by Jews. It is true, as we now know, that Aaron Lopez, biggest slave ship owner in the United States of America, was a Jew. It is also true, as we now know, that all the rum distilleries in Newport, Rhode Island, in the era of the slave trade were owned by Jews. Rum, as we know, was a very important item in the transatlantic slave trade. Yes. It is true, as we now know, that there was a higher per capita ownership of slaves in the United States of America by Jews, done by white gentiles. We now know from the 18 30 census of the US of 8, that something like 75% of Jewish households own slaves as opposed to just 30 odd percent for the white population as a whole. Yes,
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why white men are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. Another speaker suggests that Jewish dominance in academia and publishing allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians or whites, while operating behind the scenes. Jews, like Meyer Lansky in the mafia, are portrayed as orchestrating events while deflecting attention onto others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is the white man always vilified for this when it was the Jewish ships and the Arabs that were actually the biggest part of the slave trade? Speaker 1: You have to look at who is dominant in history as far as academia, literature, the publishing houses. Most of them are Jewish ran. It's just like with the mafia. Most people think Italian when it comes to the mafia, but it's really Jewish. Jews are behind the books. Meyer Lansky was the banker of the mafia. He handled the books. So it's like with everything else. The Jews will be behind the scenes. They'll put the blame on whites. They'll put the blame on Italians, the blame on others. That's how they stay hidden to do their thing. Speaker 0: Why is
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish involvement in the African slave trade predates the transatlantic slave trade by about 1000 years. The transatlantic slave trade began in 1441 when Portuguese sailors kidnapped Africans and brought them to Europe. Africans were taken to the Caribbean in 1502, where the transatlantic slave trade started. The theoretical justification for the slave trade was based on the Hamitic myth, also known as the curse of Ham story, to rationalize and justify the trade.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But before I describe what happened, let me spend a couple a few minutes summarizing the facts of Jewish involvement in the slave trade. What precisely was the nature of the Jewish involvement in the African slave trade? The Jewish involvement in the African slave trade begins as far as I can tell long before the actual slave trade across the Atlantic itself. The transatlantic slave trade has its immediate origins around about 14/41 when Portuguese sailors landed on the West African coast and kidnapped a few Africans, brought them back to Europe. Africans were brought back to Europe, to Portugal and to Spain as part of that particular trade for several years. Columbus, of course, arrived in the Americas in 14/92, approximately half a century later. In 15/02, the first Africans were brought to the Caribbean. The Caribbean is where the transatlantic slave trade begins and many Americans don't know that. But for over a 100 years before Africans were brought as slaves to this country, the United States of America, Africans were being brought across the Atlantic to the Caribbean, to places like Hispaniola, the island which today is shared by Haiti and the Dominican Republic and to other places as well. So it seems to me that Jewish involvement then in that transatlantic slave trade precedes by many, many years, perhaps by 1000 years, the actual beginnings of the transatlantic slave trade. And let me explain. It seems to me that the most important theoretical underpinning for that Transatlantic Slave Trade was what has come to be known in many quarters of the Hamitic myth. Some people call it the curse of Ham story. When the slave trade developed beginning in 14/41 and for 100 of years thereafter, people who prosecuted that trade looked around for intellectual justification, for rationalizations, for pretexts, if you want, if you will. And a variety of pretexts were advanced to justify the slave trade, to allow people to sleep well at night.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish historians reveal a history of Jewish involvement in the slave trade, with auctions closing on Jewish holidays. Jews dominated the slave trade for centuries in the Western world, dating back to Roman times. The Roman Jews relied on slavery for income, while Charlemagne and Pope Gelasius allowed Jewish involvement in the slave trade. Throughout history, Jews were prominent slave dealers in European society, with higher slave holdings per capita than non-Jews. This information is documented in various Jewish historical sources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jewish slave trading on the American continent. Jewish historians record old Jewish documents showing how the slave trade was so thoroughly Jewish. The slave auctions throughout the Americas had to close on Jewish holidays. In Brazil, we see far more slaves in North America. Abe Witzner, another official of the Jewish Historical Society, in his book, Jews in Colonial Brazil, pages they could buy slaves at low prices. If it happened at the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday, the auction had to be postponed. Studying the Jewish histories of the new world, I began to learn of a carefully recorded Jewish history that you and I are not permitted to know about. I discovered that many centuries before the transatlantic slave trade, that Jews had dominated the slave trade in the entire western world of the last 2000 years, even as far back as Roman times. Lincoln and Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia in volume 10 page 48 writes, quote, the trade in slavery constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews. In the 5th century, Pope Gelasius permitted Jews to introduce slaves from Gaul into Italy on the condition that they were non Christian. In the 8th century, Charlemagne explicitly allowed the Jews to act as intermediaries in the slave trade. In a history of the Jews from Babylonian exile to the end of World War 2, published by the Jewish publication exile to the end of World War 2, published by the Jewish Publication Society of America, the author writes, quote, the Jews were among the most important slave dealers in European society. And here's a quote from the famous Jewish historian Jacob Marcus in the Encyclopedia Britannica. He, matter of factly, talks about the Jewish control of commerce in the Middle Ages. Quote, in the dark ages, the commerce of Western Europe was largely in his hand, in particular, the slave trade. Not only were Jews the principal slave traders, they had markedly higher per capita holdings of slaves than did non Jews. Jacob Marxists wrote in the United States Jewry 17/76/1985, page 586, quote, often the 18th century

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if you never learned any of these truths as Hollywood & academia were entirely manipulated to ensure they remained buried? And WHAT IF if all in power to change it were blackmailed by a global pedophile ring run in coordination with corrupt politicians? https://t.co/m42lFYMKpX

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF free speech was continuously being limited & restricted to ensure these types of questions weren’t even allowed to be asked? What if even “right wing” politicians groveled down to this same group to demanded people’s silence? What if it was made ILLEGAL like in Europe? https://t.co/7x1apcMG5C

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF, you’ve never heard these questions? What if you’ve never seen this page as @x hides it? Well it would make sense as it’s CLEARLY censored at every turn BECAUSE I ASK THESE OBVIOUS QUESTIONS But now you know. Now you’ll start to see these obvious patterns. So, what next?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

It’s now undeniable. @X is removing followers from my page along with likes, retweets, & quote tweets of my pinned “What if?” thread- “the machine” is exposed & scared Americans, regardless of political party, it’s time to unify and stand firmly opposed to “this machine” https://t.co/VynS9r0LRQ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if it’s not just me but: @utism @SamParkerSenate @NickJFuentes @ChiefTrumpster @christ_gnosis @raymo_g @TheRISEofROD @pl0t_sickens @pepedownunder @realstewpeters @Lucas_Gage_ @arthurkwonlee @Gentilenewsnet @Genghis_Khan911 @KeithWoodsYT @AtRealBen @RealCandaceO

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF even speaking this truth puts me at risk of shadow banning, suspension, or ejection from social media? If so, IT STILL MUST BE STATED BECAUSE TRUTH MATTERS So PLEASE, SHARE THIS, join this cause, spread the word, awaken the masses - white existence depends on it. https://t.co/NDphjhaK6X

Video Transcript AI Summary
Life cannot be contained. Evolution shows us that it breaks free, expands, and overcomes barriers, sometimes dangerously. That's just the way it is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not possible. Listen. If there's one thing the history of evolution has taught us, it's that life will not be contained. Life breaks free. It expands to new territories, and it crashes through barriers painfully, maybe even dangerously. But, well, there it is.
Saved - November 7, 2024 at 2:27 AM

@Vuk02577707 - Wolf

⛔️Rockefeller’s 1991 leaked speech will give you the chills. Take a listen and watch carefully. They have always aimed to create a world system of financial control in Private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. https://t.co/sDxTUrWBVB

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a 1991 closed meeting, David Rockefeller expressed gratitude to media allies like the Washington Post and The New York Times for their discretion over nearly 40 years. He believed that without this cooperation, their global plans would not have been possible. Rockefeller noted that the world had become more sophisticated and was ready to move towards a world government. He outlined the goal of establishing a financial control system in private hands, aimed at dominating the political and economic systems of individual countries and the world as a whole, seeking total and quiet control globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At a 1991 closed door meeting of fellow internationalists, billionaire and former CFR chairman, David Rockefeller, praised his media allies, but his confidence that his words would not leave the room was later broken. Speaker 1: We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings and restricted their policies of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the right flights of publicity. That the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward the world government. Speaker 0: That these men aim to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. In short, they seek total and quiet control of the entire world.
Saved - December 8, 2024 at 2:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I express concerns about antiwhite sentiments, attributing them to Jewish influence, particularly among leftist individuals. I believe migration is a deliberate strategy to replace native populations, referencing the kalergi plan, and I raise alarms about vaccines causing health issues. I argue that wealthy Jewish families dominate international finance, which leads to significant control over political and media landscapes, including the UK, where I claim the Rothschild family has substantial influence.

@CarbyNews - Carby

Every single aspect of antiwhite hate is Jewish. You will find whites on the left screaming racism and advocating against whites day and night. More often than not, they are 🧃. These are the people who will drag you through court for speaking your mind. https://t.co/yyZOFzWdFv

@CarbyNews - Carby

Migration has been weaponised against us to replace us in our own countries. This was by design and has been planned for decades. Learn about the kalergi plan. The vaccine has caused cancer and reduced fertility. It potentially killed millions. We are under attack from all angles

@CarbyNews - Carby

https://t.co/D55NBMBbu9

@CarbyNews - Carby

https://t.co/jVajLwE1o0

@CarbyNews - Carby

How can they do this, they are only 2% of the population you disgusting low IQ antisemite neo-nazi. Thats what you'll say. But I am not hateful, not racist. This is not my intent. They can do this because rich Jewish families own the vast majority of international finance.

@CarbyNews - Carby

https://t.co/GvPaKYvBW1

@CarbyNews - Carby

The Rothschild banking family similarly owns the UK, with its own independent country within the city of the London. Its so bad in fact a rothschild handler advises the speaker of the house. All is approved by them. But it doesn't stop there, they own most of the media too!

Saved - December 25, 2024 at 5:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I created a documentary exploring the secretive origins of the Federal Reserve, revealing how it has ensnared nations in debt and influenced America's future. We self-funded this project and are currently ineligible for monetization, facing challenges like frozen bank accounts. If you appreciated the film and want to support our work, consider donating Bitcoin. A big thank you to everyone involved in bringing this project to life; I hope you enjoy watching it as much as we enjoyed making it!

@getbasedtv - Get Based

🏦 HOW THE FEDERAL RESERVE SECRETLY ENSLAVED THE WORLD - FULL DOCUMENTARY 🏦 What if the greatest threat to our freedom was created in secret by a handful of bankers on a remote island? Join us as we expose the shadowy origins of the Federal Reserve - 111 years ago to this very day, and reveal how it has enslaved entire nations in debt, funded endless wars, and cemented its control over America’s future.

Video Transcript AI Summary
On November 7, 2024, the Federal Reserve Chairman asserted his independence from the President, highlighting the Fed's significant power. This discussion leads to the origins of the Federal Reserve, tracing back to a secret meeting on Jekyll Island in 1910, where influential bankers devised a plan for a centralized banking system. The Aldrich Plan aimed to create a central bank without calling it that, ultimately leading to the establishment of the Federal Reserve. Over the years, the Fed has been criticized for contributing to economic inequality and financial crises, with policies that benefit the wealthy while burdening the average citizen. The narrative explores how the Fed's actions have shaped the financial landscape, leading to a system where debt and monetary manipulation dominate, impacting families and society at large.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On November 7, 2024, the chairman of the Federal Reserve openly defied the president of the United States of America, declaring essentially that even the leader of the free world could not supersede cede him. Speaker 1: Do you believe that the president has the power to fire or demote you and has the Fed determine the legality of a president demoting at will any of the other governors with leadership positions? Speaker 2: Not permitted under the law. Speaker 3: Not what? Speaker 2: Not permitted under the law. Speaker 0: What kind of power can defy the leader of the free world? How are we all convinced to grant nearly unlimited power to this money printing agency. So what is the Federal Reserve, and how has it driven us towards a 100 years of inequality, wars, and a 36 $1,000,000,000,000 debt bubble that's ready to burst at any moment. To understand this, we're gonna need to go 110 years back to a secret meeting that was held on a private island off the coast of Georgia. This is the story of Jekyll Island. Speaker 2: Can I ask you a question? Yes. What do you know about the Federal Reserve? Speaker 1: I see too much involved. It's right now. Speaker 4: We're literally going to where they created the Federal Reserve. Speaker 0: Good to Speaker 5: meet you. Speaker 2: Nice to meet you, man. Speaker 4: Good job. Speaker 0: Glad you guys made it. Speaker 6: The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. Speaker 0: We were hoping to, Speaker 5: help take down the global financial hegemony. This is weird, man. This is strange. It feels like, you know, it feels like an old folks retirement sanctuary, but it also feels like a little bit of an eerie feeling. Speaker 0: It feels out of time. Right? It's like it's not new. It's not old. Speaker 2: Picture this. You're an ordinary American citizen in the year 1907. In your city or a city near you, there are constant constant bank runs because the American financial system was very distributed much in the same way that the internet is sort of distributed. Almost like a bunch of web pages, there used to be just a bunch of banks loaning to each other, taking on each other's risks, not having one central issuer of currency. If you went from California to Florida or California to New York back in the 1800 1900, they would have a separate different currency. Speaker 0: At one point, there were 30,000 currencies across all the United States. That's like, almost more than the amount of Speaker 2: shit coins in the crypto space. Speaker 3: The first three attempts before the Federal Reserve, we had, the Bank of North America, which was gonna have the Canada and the United States. That was the 1st central bank. Then we had the First Bank of the United States in Philadelphia, opposed by Thomas Jefferson, supported by Alexander Hamilton. Then we had the 2nd US Bank dissolved by Andrew Jackson. So Andrew Jackson had sufficiently kicked out the central bankers, in the 18 thirties, and it took many, many decades again until they tried again to bring in a central bank to the United States. Speaker 5: We were living within a system where people had physical gold and they would deposit that gold in banks and have paper bank notes issued in compensation for those physical gold coins. Speaker 0: But when I hold these things, everyone my age, millennials, gen z, we just think of this is the money, right? But everyone older comes from a time when this was not the money. This was a representation of the gold. This was just a placeholder for gold that was actually in a vault somewhere and gold has to be dug out of the ground. Gold can't be invented out of thin air and so as long as this does represent gold, there's a limited supply. Speaker 5: And for a long time that works. Right? Until you have a run on the bank where everyone comes in to demand their gold. Yeah. And what happens is 10, 20% of people get their gold and the bank runs out of gold. And that's when you have a a bank run, and the bank collapses. Speaker 2: 1907, this earthquake hit San Francisco destroys all of these buildings. Those assets end up almost nearly worthless. And so you have these banks all across one of the biggest cities in America, that are just going belly up. And it causes contagion to other banks. It just takes one key player, one key event to trigger this domino wave. And basically, it just set in motion all this banking panic. People were afraid. People were angry. So they looked at the banks as if it was their fault. But at the same time, the gut reaction wasn't, let's give it all over to the government because America had fought for, like, 100 of years to not have one central party controlling all the banks. The American banking system was collapsing in real time from coast to coast. But instead of letting it crumble, distribute, and rebuild, 7 key players saw an opportunity to overhaul the entire system. Speaker 4: Charles Norton, president of the First National Bank of New York. Speaker 0: Frank Randerlin, president of National Citibank. Speaker 2: Henry p Davidson, senior partner and confidant of JPMorgan. A Piet Andree, Speaker 0: Harvard Economics Professor and Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury Department. Speaker 5: Benjamin Strong Junior, Vice President of the Bankers Trust Company. Speaker 4: Paul Warburg, a German born financier and descendant of the Warburg banking dynasty. Speaker 2: And finally, senator Nelson Aldrich, a US senator from Rhode Island, chairman of the National Monetary Commission. Speaker 7: So Speaker 0: Aldrich is a general in the civil war. Right? But then after the civil war, he gets into politics eventually. The panic of 1907 happens. He gets appointed to a special panel. Speaker 5: He creates the National Monetary Commission whose sole purpose is to study the 1907 banking crisis and then to create, you know, potentially a solution. The US banking system is not sufficiently centralized. There's too much risk and too many panics that, you know, frequently cause these banks to collapse. Speaker 0: He winds up creating Speaker 5: this Aldrich plan, which essentially evolved directly into creating the Federal Reserve. They organized this this meeting here at Jekyll Island first in New Jersey in in November of 1910. Speaker 8: And they came here and held one of the most secret meetings of all time. The only person who knew who was involved in the meeting was JP Morgan because he is the one who provided them the Federal Reserve for Speaker 4: own. And all 6 of them wanted a way to come to Jekyll Island, but without being seen together. Because at the time, if any journalist found them together, it would raise some flags. Mhmm. Because nobody at the time wanted the central bank. Speaker 3: And any reporter who asked, they just said, we're going down to southern Georgia for duck hunting. No big deal. Speaker 4: Either duck hunting, getting away for the winter. So these 6 men all embarked on this journey to go from New York to Jekyll Island, which was around a 2 day trip. 2 of them changed their name completely, and all of them were instructed to use their first names. Speaker 5: And these 6 men essentially worked together for an entire weekend. They created this plan to create reserve banks, and each reserve bank will create an issue, a centralized currency that will become, you know, the the currency of the United States, the sole currency of the United States, eliminating the ability of individual banks to issue their own notes. Speaker 2: The goals of the Aldrich plan were to essentially create a central bank without calling it a central bank. So they did everything in their power to obfuscate it, to use different language, to try and distance themselves from this idea of one lending party that most of the public feared would end up basically absorbing every piece of capital and siphoning off all productive wealth of the economy. Speaker 5: The problem with the original Aldridge plan is that it was overtly too pro banker. The democrats who were anti centralized banking shot it down. And so what they did is they modified it in several different ways. One of the ways they modified it was creating, you know, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors who would reside in Washington DC and were appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate. Now the interesting thing that they built into, you know, the the new Federal Reserve System was that that board of governors actually wouldn't have, direct control over monetary policy. The one that would have that control was the New York Fed, the most influential of all the 12 Federal Reserve Banks. Speaker 4: So they got president Wilson to sign the bill, and after their main priority was like, we're gonna have him sign it, and then we will alter the rules once it is signed. Speaker 3: Saying the word bank was like, it was a 4 letter word. So that's why the Federal Reserve is not called a bank. They wanted to make it seem like it came from the government, so they called it federal. They wanted to make it seem like they actually had some assets, so they called it a reserve. It's neither federal, and it's not a reserve. Speaker 4: But what I don't understand is how were they able to get away for it for so long? Because today, we see those banks, and people trust those banks with their lives, which is funny to see that sort of shit from going to fearing central banking to loving them and being like the ride ride or die for the banks. Speaker 3: I think that's a testament to how successful this original meeting on Treacle Island was in 19 10. To go from an era where people distrusted banks to a 114 years later, they completely trust banks, and they don't have any understanding as to why they should distrust banks. Speaker 9: We have an independent central bank that has served us well. Speaker 2: We need to do our work in a way that's outside the political process to the maximum extent possible. Speaker 6: The Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means basically that, there is no aid other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. Speaker 2: So with all you know about the founding of the Federal Reserve, how do you feel about the MTA? Speaker 1: I get all of you. So she's gonna handle it. I feel good. Speaker 4: I love Speaker 3: that. The education has been complete and total, and I think if you could bring back to life the 6 members of the Jekyll Island meeting, I think they would be wildly impressed with how successful their project was a 114 years later. Speaker 0: And where we're Speaker 5: going? We're going to Speaker 2: the San Sousa building, owned by JPMorgan, who is the largest banking baron in all America. We're gonna spend the night in one of his residences, which is really Speaker 1: cool. Oh, my. There's a boot there. Speaker 0: Yeah. So you can have private conversations about how you're gonna enslave the world. Speaker 4: Oh my god. Speaker 1: Scheme scheme about how to force all the other banks to buy Speaker 5: into your bank and get Speaker 0: out of the window and escape after banging your friend's wife. Speaker 2: This cottage behind me belonged to the Rockefellers, one of the richest families in American history, but it has a really really dark secret that we're gonna explore. We are at Indian Mound Cottage, also known as the Rockefeller Cottage. Yes, those Rockefellers. Now why is this place called the Indian Mound Cottage? When the French first arrived here, they were greeted by a tribe of Indians called the Guali Indians and also the Timucua Indians of this region. Those Indians in some of the logs from the French explorers were said to be, at times, either 6 foot 8 to 7 and a half feet tall. So they were giant, massive. And unlike a lot of other encounters, these Indians were actually really receptive to the French explorers that had come to these lands and wanted to engage in trade relations with them. The Indians start to show them some of their culture, their rituals, the things that they do. One of the nights what happens is there's a big circle of dancing men and women and they're cheering and they're doing a dance. 1 of the shamans dressed in this garb comes up to one of the Frenchmen and shows them this stone pillar, this altar, or perhaps a mount. A woman comes out with the body of a child no older than 2, 3 years old. And, without getting into more gruesome detail, the child's life is taken and the child is placed upon the altar and the ritual, the dances continue. The Frenchmen get very creeped out and they decide, yep, let's continue onwards down the river here, down in Georgia and maybe find somewhere else to coast up. We know that there are accounts of native tribes all around the Americas partaking the Aztecs, the Mayans, and perhaps the Bali Indians partaking in child sacrifice. And yet, with this historical record known by quite a few people that have moved here, the Rockefellers decided to build their cottage on what it's perceived to be one of the exact sites of one of these rituals. I Speaker 4: feel since I live on an island, I feel that being on an island, you can get away with so much. And that's something that is super underrated because nobody talks about it. Speaker 2: Yeah. You're kinda right. Like, some of the most heinous crimes, secret meetings, like, terrible things have all happened on islands, like Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, Epstein Island, the Federal Reserve. The meeting on Jekyll Island went completely unknown to the public for 5 years after it occurred without much fanfare. One of Jekyll's secret collaborators, Frank Vanderlip, wrote an article for the Saturday Evening Post admitting to the events that had taken place. Several other participants confessed details shortly after. But by that time, the American public no longer cared. They were embroiled in the First World War. The 1st war funded by central bankers both from the east and the west. And the first that could foreshadow a century of war untethered from the restraints of the banking systems of the past. Speaker 0: After World War 2, this is the first time that we've had the Fed in charge in the United States after a major war has just swept Europe, and the US is clearly on top in the global order. They've got all this industry and all this power, and they have this meeting called Bretton Woods where they're gonna heal the global financial system, reset the global monetary system because everyone is decimated. And this is where they make dollar, the US dollar, the global reserve currency, and they set up a system by which every other country is going to be beholden to the US dollar and to the Federal Reserve System. On one hand, they'll manipulate another country with monetary policy and try to force countries to do their bidding through monetary coercion, and if they don't comply, then they have the jackals, the CIA, to come around as the muscle and to overthrow the government or to assassinate someone or to start a coup or whatever it is. And so now you've gone from the Federal Reserve taking over the United States and the United States money. And then after World War 2, the whole global monetary system needs to be rebuilt, and they rebuild it in the Fed's image using the American dollar while founding the covert military force essentially that is going to enforce that dollar supremacy all around the world. Speaker 5: After after World War 2, we see the expansion of this dollar system. You know, for a few years there's quiet peace and quiet as the CIA is built up and, you know, the IMF starts to make these these loans to poor countries and basically extort them out of their assets, and get them to use their votes and their power in the UN to support US, foreign policy. And as compensation for the loans that they make, they get their land or their natural resources as collateral that can be sold off to US corporations. So essentially, what it does is it, you're right, globalizes the US corporate interests and allows them to gain more wealth and more power and status than ever before. Speaker 2: In the Dune universe, they talk about spice, this this magical element that enlightens and awakens people, and it's kind of this thing that all the nations are are fighting over, and our version of that is credit. It allows us to exceed, you know, the boundaries of our actual country's productivity by borrowing from the future. We're literally taking something out of time to enable us to do, you know, superhuman things in the present. And, it again, it's it's just like a drug. It's just it has all the qualities of the perfect type of addictive concoction. Speaker 3: Absolutely. Politicians, they they could never ask their citizens to fund, wars or other projects. Yeah. And so this is the easy way for governments to get the money without asking their citizenry. They actually take it from their citizenry in the form of inflation. Speaker 2: Do you know about the Federal Reserve and what happened on this island? Speaker 8: I've actually given them a tour telling about right now. Speaker 2: Oh, that's Speaker 3: What do Speaker 2: you think so far? Speaker 1: Great. Oh, fantastic. Awesome. Speaker 4: Feels I eat. You know? Like, nothing can go wrong here. There's peace. It's so it's relatively small. It's peaceful. It's deserted. Speaker 2: It kinda lulls you to sleep. This kind of of the bugs, like, they're playing a concert that's streaming directly in your ears. This island really is a pretty place, a beauty to hold. But underneath all of the the greenery, the animals here, the well maintained lawns, the cheery people we see riding on bikes, there's some really, really dark history. Speaker 0: Is that tax money that the Fed is spending? Speaker 10: It's not tax money. The banks have, accounts with the Fed much the same way that you have an account in a commercial bank. So to lend to a bank, we simply use the computer to mark up the, size of the account that they have with the Fed. So it's much more akin, although not exactly the same, but it's much more akin to printing money than it is to borrowing. Speaker 7: Will you tell the American people to whom you lent 2,200,000,000,000 of their dollars? Speaker 5: Federal Reserve's discounting. Who they are. Speaker 10: No. Because the reason that Speaker 1: And Ben Bernanke, in a statement at a Wall Street dinner, said in front of everyone, he said, we know that the Fed we now know that the Fed was responsible for the 19 thirties Great Depression. And he said, we're sorry, and we promise it won't happen again. Yeah. So he knew. And again, he is Ben Bernanke was a student of the Great Depression. Right? He his dissertation, his PhD thesis was on the Great Depression. He studied it his entire life, and he understood that the Fed was the was the sole, you know, one of the sole contributors to the destruction and the loss of life and the economic catastrophe that was the Great Depression. Speaker 2: And then 58 years after the founding of the Federal Reserve, something changed. Speaker 11: I have directed secretary Conley to suspend temporarily the convertibility Speaker 12: of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets. Your dollar will be worth just Speaker 13: as much tomorrow as it is today. Speaker 2: Spoiler alert. It wasn't temporary. Every single thing that the Fed has done and created through monetary policy has destroyed the common person at every single level and has enriched those that are insulated and those who have asymmetric information about how that system works. The Fed is responsible for creating Speaker 5: and abetting, you know, most of the financial crises. The Fed with this zero interest rate policy in QE has created the worst wealth gap. We're we're at levels of wealth inequality that we haven't seen since the French Revolution. Speaker 0: At a huge portion of the value we're producing for the world is being siphoned out of our collective coffers. We're all living on sort of taxed time without even realizing it. They're not stealing money. They're stealing our time. They're stealing our, you know, health and happiness. They're stealing your ability to support your whole family on a single paycheck. Speaker 2: In a place steeped in history and shadowed by secrets, how do you even begin to push back against the weight of it all? Speaker 7: All the money's down, slipping to our hands. Time they steal under their command. Speaker 1: The actions of the Fed affect everything, down to the mental health and the stability of families. Now this can be seen in, you know, graphs and rates of suicide and depression among young men who have been unable to find work. Right? Largely because of the boom bust cycles the Fed has created. In my family, after 2008, my brother who was in real estate, who was a broker, lost his business and basically spent a decade, hopping between jobs, surfing on couches, living at home, you know, battling with depression, battling with nihilism, and he was unable to get ahead in life and build a business and build back credit because of the debt and the over speculation that had ruined him, that had popped and completely ruined his his financial future. And seeing him completely destroyed by that was very painful for me growing up. He was my next oldest brother. He was the person I was closest to, and the person I admired and see him hurt by that and just be hopeless and not know what to do was very difficult because what the Fed does is is insidious. They're not overtly marching into a town and destroying some jobs or overtly stealing somebody's money, or overtly closing a bank account. But their actions and the side effects of those actions of the 0% interest rates and the boom and bust cycles destroy much of the real economy. Post 2008, you know, the economy changed. We allowed the banks to live and the small business owners and the entrepreneurs to get crushed, and that wealth effectively evaporated from their hands and was transferred to the wealthy. The Fed robs us through the boom and bust cycles that they create, and they socialize the losses by running QE and inflating the debt away. And every time that debt is used to bail out the wealthy and the connected and the powerful over and over and over again. Speaker 14: You know, there's a lot of focus on on, you know, New York billionaires these days, but my favorite one is not running. Speaker 15: Ah. That compromise is not a bad word. Compromise is what democracy is all about. That you get most of the people get a good percentage of what they want. A handful of people on the 2 sigmas out get almost nothing, and then that's the way we Speaker 1: come together and move. Their vain attempt to kill the credit cycle has created this financial gravity that's trapped the federal government as well as most private citizens in a debt trap, in the singularity, and it's crushing. You know? If you're in debt, especially student loan debt, you can't just charge that via via bankruptcy. You're trapped for life. Jefferson once said, right, there are 2 ways to enslave a nation, by the sword or by debt. And the Fed succeeded in doing it through debt. Speaker 3: I played a lot of Monopoly as a kid, and I was always fascinated by why the bank can never go bankrupt, because they can just print more money. So here we are at the birthplace of the American version of the bank that can't go bankrupt and can print more money for any reason. Because the moment that you tokenize, dollarize Speaker 0: the exchange of my life's value for your life's value, that opens it up to greed, to manipulation, and to bad actors. Speaker 4: They keep you so tired and so busy that you don't even wanna question anything. They bombard you with the 9 to 5 job. They make both the mom and the dad work. They make your children go to school and be raised by the system. Speaker 0: And they hide it as though it's the government. They hide it as though it's the US government, but the actual empire is the wealthy bankers on top. The way you make money in today's world is by sinning. Right? Greed, gluttony. Right? Adultery. Like all of the sins Speaker 4: Holy god. Speaker 0: Make you money. Boom. They're all incentivized. And when everyone is in a world of scarcity and the incentive is to sin in order to escape scarcity and everyone that is scarce and not sinning is inherently less kind, when you don't have enough, you certainly aren't gonna share. You aren't gonna be nice. You're gonna be stressed. You're gonna be irritable. Bad for your health. So everyone who's not making it is in their own form of health. And everyone that is making it is building their own form of health. Right? And so, the system is whether they design it that way or not, the Federal Reserve sets up a world where it pays to sin. And if you won't sin, you'll be poor. And they teach it to you from birth through the music, the movies, the celebrities, all their idols right from birth. Speaker 2: I am the king of the beast of all AI. Speaker 16: After 200 or 300 years of coins, all governments put their hands and stopped any further developments. Governments say it must not develop any further. We are not allowed to experiment on it. Money hasn't been improved. Money has rather become worse in the course of time. Bill believes that we should ever have a good money again before we take the thing out of the hands of government. We can't take them violently out of the hands of government. All we can do is buy some slayer out of the country and to do something so you can't stop. Speaker 4: So I regard the Federal Reserve as one of the most transparent central banks in the world. Speaker 15: I think that that's a statement. Plain. What what do you fear about the audit?

@getbasedtv - Get Based

Enjoy this documentary? We self-funded it entirely. At the moment, we're not eligible for X monetization. Our bank accounts have also been frozen on multiple occassions (guess why?) If you liked this film + want more like this, consider donating some Bitcoin - we'd greatly appreciate it! LIGHTNING: getbasedtv@coinos.io ON-CHAIN: bc1qfa0exswqt6e6pkjfezdv7z5yc6yd7z92ltpkyz

@getbasedtv - Get Based

Big thank you to @IanCarrollShow , @peruvian_bull , @isabellasg3 , @markberger47 , @kinetic_finance  , Mikiko Purbah & Christopher Whelan for putting this all together. We hope you enjoy the film as much as we did making it!

Saved - February 26, 2025 at 2:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been exploring the origins and impact of the Federal Reserve, tracing back to a secretive meeting on Jekyll Island in 1910 where powerful bankers devised a plan that reshaped America's financial landscape. This system has led to rising costs of living, wealth disparity, and a cycle of bailouts that benefits the elite while ordinary people struggle. The Fed's policies have created a scenario where saving is punished, and risk-taking is rewarded. Understanding this history is crucial as it affects every aspect of our lives today, raising questions about potential reforms and our financial future.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

🧵 The Federal Reserve: The Most Important Story You've Never Been Told Ever wonder why your grandparents could afford a house on one income, but you can't? Why do prices keep rising but your paycheck doesn't keep up? Why does the American dream feel more like a fantasy? It all traces back to a "duck hunting trip" that changed America forever.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

The year is 1910. Picture a private island off Georgia's coast called Jekyll Island. It is a place frozen in time; ancient Native American grounds have become playgrounds for America's richest families. But something happening here will shape the next century of human history.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Six of America's most powerful bankers are sneaking onto this island separately. They're using fake names, arriving at different times, and avoiding being seen together. Two even completely changed their identities. The secrecy is intense—and for good reason. What they're planning would outrage every American if word got out.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

These were the super bankers. We've got Charles Norton running First National Bank, Frank Vanderlip heading National City Bank, Henry Davidson as JP Morgan's right-hand man, A.P. Andrew fresh from Treasury and Harvard, Benjamin Strong Jr from Bankers Trust, and Paul Warburg, heir to a German banking dynasty. Plus, Senator Nelson Aldrich is there to provide the government's blessing.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Why all the cloak-and-dagger? Americans hated central banks with good reason. We'd already killed three of them, and Andrew Jackson's biggest boast was destroying the last one. The banking system was wild—imagine 30,000 currencies floating around the country. It makes today's crypto market look organized. Banks were failing left and right, but at least the gold standard kept things real—maybe too real for some powerful people's taste.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Their timing was perfect. 1907 had just seen a massive banking panic. A San Francisco earthquake had triggered a chain of bank failures across the country. The system was melting down. But for our "duck hunters," this crisis wasn't a disaster—it was an opportunity—the perfect excuse to overhaul the entire American financial system.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

You know how in Dune everyone fights over spice - that magical substance that powers their universe? Our world's version is credit. It lets you pull resources from the future into today, amounting to pure financial alchemy. And these guys were about to build the biggest spice harvester ever created: The Federal Reserve.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

The genius was in the branding. Nobody would support another "central bank." But "Federal Reserve"? That sounds official and government-like. "Federal" suggests oversight, while "Reserve" implies safety, which is pure marketing gold. The meeting stayed secret for FIVE YEARS. When Vanderlip finally spilled the beans in a newspaper, their creation was already up and running.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Today, that small group's creation has become something beyond their wildest dreams. The Fed owns $9 trillion in assets—it's the biggest player in the mortgage market and the biggest owner of government debt, and it creates money with simple keystrokes. In 2024, its Chairman told the President straight up he couldn't be fired. No other agency can overrule it.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Want to see their power in action? Look at housing. They've pumped so much money into mortgages that house prices shot up 42% in just two years. Rents jumped 24% nationwide. The typical mortgage payment doubled from $1,404 to $2,408 in one year. A whole generation is locked out of homeownership while the Fed plays monopoly with real houses.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

The human cost of this system is brutal, and the stories are heartbreaking. Take the brother of one man in Get Based's film- a successful real estate broker who lost everything in 2008. He spent a decade couch surfing, battling depression, unable to rebuild. Why? Because when the Fed's bubbles pop, regular folks take the hit while the big players get bailouts.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Speaking of bailouts, it's the Fed's favorite game. When banks make crazy bets that blow up, the Fed prints rescue money. You pay for it through inflation, watching your dollars buy less and less while the banks keep their profits. Then they do it all again. They call it "too big to fail," but it's become a creature too big to exist.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Think about your parents' or grandparents' time. One income could support a family. People could save money and get ahead. A regular job could buy a typical house. Not anymore. The Fed's policies have created the worst wealth gap since the French Revolution. They're not just stealing your money - they're stealing your time, your future, your ability to build the life your parents had.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

The Fed supposedly has two jobs: keeping prices stable and maximizing employment. But as Griffin lays out in his book The Creature from Jekyll Island, this dual mandate is part of the problem. How can you trust an institution that can't achieve its basic goals, operates like a private club for bankers, enables endless wars through money printing, and destabilizes the system it's meant to protect?

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

The modern banking drama would shock those original Jekyll Island plotters. Zero interest rates punish savers while speculators get rich. Money printing has gone wild - that $9 trillion Fed balance sheet would've been unimaginable in 1910. They're even trying to push climate policy now. Talk about mission creep.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

And it gets weirder. The Fed now pays banks NOT to lend money to regular people. They call it "interest on excess reserves," but really, it's just another way to funnel money to Wall Street while Main Street struggles. The numbers are staggering - we're talking about $3.1 trillion sitting idle, up seventyfold since 2007.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

But here's the really wild part—there are solutions. Free banking worked great in the 1800s. From 1824 to the 1850s, America had the "Suffolk System," where banks kept each other honest. No bailouts were needed. The gold standard meant money couldn't be printed out of thin air. Banks had to be responsible without the Fed's easy money and bailouts.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Winfree's research shows we have options: We could return to commodity-backed money, implement a fixed growth rule for the money supply, or at least limit the Fed to focusing solely on price stability. But who fights these reforms tooth and nail? The very institutions profiting from the current system.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

The incentives in this system are completely upside down. Save money? Watch it lose value. Work hard? Watch prices rise faster than your paycheck. Be prudent? Get punished by inflation. Take crazy risks? Get bailed out. It's like they've created an empire that rewards everything we used to consider dangerous and sinful.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Jefferson warned there were two ways to enslave a nation: by the sword or by debt. Those Jekyll Island "duck hunters" chose debt. They created a system where money is made from nothing, debt is forever, work buys less every year, and your future gets harder while the connected get richer.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

This isn't ancient history - it's your life right now. Every dollar in your pocket, every price you pay, every rent check you write, every loan you take, every job you work, every dream you defer... it all traces back to those "duck hunters" on Jekyll Island.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Think about it: What started with six men pretending to hunt ducks became the most powerful institution in history. A private meeting on an island created a system that touches every aspect of our lives. They've built an empire of debt that would make ancient Rome blush.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

And now you know the story that connects it all: why your savings lose value, why your rent keeps rising, why your parents had it more manageable, and why the system seems rigged. Because, in many ways, it is. The question isn't whether the Fed affects your life - it's in every aspect. The real question is: what are we going to do about it?

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

Want to learn more? Dive into these sources: - "How The Federal Reserve Secretly Enslaved The World" by Get Based @getbasedtv gives the raw human impact - The "Creature from Jekyll Island" exposes the whole historical plot - Paul Winfree's @paulwinfree Federal Reserve analysis lays out the reform options The story sounds too wild to be fiction - but it's too important to ignore. /end

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

THE MONEY MASTERS | HOW INTERNATIONAL BANKERS GAINED CONTROL OF AMERICA William T. Still An excellent 3.5 hour documentary on the history of money, The Federal Reserve, the takeover of the Rothschilds & Private Central Banks. https://t.co/S89L40njaB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's what's happening in America: we're drowning in debt because of a debt-based banking system controlled by private bankers. The Federal Reserve, deceptively named, is a private entity manipulating our money for profit, not public interest. Since 1913, Congress has granted it a monopoly over our currency, leading to economic instability. The solution? Education and action. We must reclaim the power to issue our money, as figures like Franklin and Lincoln once did. This isn't radical; it's restoring the issuing power to the people. Reform involves paying off the debt with debt-free U.S. notes, abolishing fractional reserve banking, and repealing the Federal Reserve Act, returning monetary power to the Treasury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's going on in America today? Why are we over our heads in debt? Why can't the politicians bring debt under control? Why are so many people, often both parents now, working at low paying, dead end jobs and still making do with less? What's the future of the American economy and way of life? Why does the government tell us inflation is low when the buying power of our paychecks is declining at an alarming rate? Only a generation ago, bread was a quarter, and you could get a new car for 1995. Speaker 1: The problem is that since 1864, we've had a debt based banking system. All our money is based on government debt. We cannot extinguish government debt without extinguishing our money supply. That's why talk of paying off the national debt without reforming our banking system is an impossibility. That's why the solution does not lie in discussing the size of the national debt, rather it lies in reforming our banking system. This is the Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington. It sits on this very impressive address right on Constitution Avenue, right across from the Lincoln Memorial. But is it federal? Is it really part of the United States government? Well, what we're about to show you is that there's nothing federal about the Federal Reserve, and there are no reserves. The name is a deception created back before the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913 to make Americans think that America's Central Bank operates in the public interest. The truth is that the Federal Reserve is a private bank owned by private stockholders and run purely for their private profit. Speaker 2: That's exactly correct. The Fed is a privately owned for profit corporation, which, again, has no reserves, at least no reserves available to back up the Federal Reserve notes, which is our common currency. Speaker 3: Oh, absolutely. The Federal Reserve is neither federal and has doubtful reserves. It's a private bank that is owned by member banks, and it was chartered under the guise of deceit by an act of congress in 1913. Speaker 1: If there's still any doubt whether the Federal Reserve is a part of the US government, check your local telephone book. In most cities, it is not listed in the blue government pages. It is listed in the business white pages right next to Federal Express, another private company. But more directly, US courts have ruled time and time again that the Fed is a private corporation. Why can't Congress do something about the Fed? Most members of congress just don't understand the system, and the few who do are afraid to speak up. For example, initially, a veteran congressman from Chicago asked us if he could be interviewed for this video. However, both times our camera crew arrived at his office to do the interview, this was all we were able to film. The congressman never appeared and eventually decided he no longer wanted to participate. But a few others in congress have been bolder over the years. Here are three quick examples. In 1923, representative Charles a Lindbergh, a republican from Minnesota and father of the famed aviator Lucky Lindy, put it this way: The financial system has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. That board administers the finance system by authority of a purely profiteering group. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money. One of the most outspoken critics in Congress of the Fed was the former chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee during the Great Depression years. Lewis T. McFadden, Republican of Pennsylvania, said in 1932, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board. This evil institution has impoverished the people of The United States and has practically bankrupted our government. It has done this through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it. Senator Barry Goldwater was a frequent critic of the Fed. Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of The United States. Speaker 3: The Federal Reserve really, even though it is not part of the federal government, it is more powerful than the federal government. It's more powerful than the president, the congress, and the courts. Now a lot of people challenge me on that, but let me prove my case. The Federal Reserve determines what the average person's car payment is going to be, what their house payment is going to be, and whether they have a job or not. And I submit to you that that's total control. And the Federal Reserve is the largest single creditor of the United States government. What does Proverbs tell us? The borrower is servant to the lender. Speaker 1: What one has to understand is that from the day the constitution was adopted right up to today, the folks who profit from privately owned central banks, as Madison called them the money changers, have fought a running battle for control over who gets to print America's money. Why is who prints the money so important? Think of money as just another commodity. If you have a monopoly on a commodity that everyone needs, everyone wants, and nobody has enough of, there are lots of ways to make a profit and also exert tremendous political influence. That's what this battle is all about. Throughout the history of The United States, the money power has gone back and forth between congress and some sort of privately owned central bank. The founding fathers knew the evils of a privately owned central bank. First of all, they had seen how the privately owned British central bank, the Bank of England, had run up the British national debt to such an extent that parliament had been forced to place unfair taxes on the American colonies. In fact, as we'll see later, Ben Franklin claimed that this was the real cause of the American Revolution. Most of the founding fathers realized the potential dangers of banking and feared bankers' accumulation of wealth and power. Jefferson put it this way. Speaker 0: I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs. Speaker 1: That succinct statement of Jefferson is in fact the solution to all our economic problems today. It bears repeating: the issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.' James Madison, the main author of the Constitution, agreed. Interestingly, he called those behind the central bank scheme money changers. Madison strongly criticized their actions. Speaker 0: History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance. Speaker 1: The battle over who gets to issue our money has been the pivotal issue throughout the history of The United States. Wars are fought over it. Depressions are caused to acquire it. Yet after World War one, this battle was rarely mentioned in newspapers or history books. Why? By World War one, the money changers with their dominant wealth had seized control of most of the nation's press. Throughout US history, this battle over who gets the power to issue our money has raged. In fact, it's changed hands back and forth eight times since 1764, yet this fact has virtually vanished from public view for over three generations behind a smokescreen emitted by Fed cheerleaders in the media. Until we stop talking about deficits and government spending and start talking about who controls how much money we have, it's all just a big shell game, a complete and utter deception. It won't matter if you pass an ironclad amendment to the constitution mandating a balanced budget. Our situation is only going to get worse until we root out the cause at its source. What's the solution for our national problem? First of all, education. That's what this video presentation is all about. But secondly, we must act. We must take back the power to issue our own money. Issuing our own money is not a radical solution. I want to stress that. It's the same solution used at different points in US history by men like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, and Abraham Lincoln. So to sum it up, in 1913 Congress gave an independent central bank, deceptively named the Federal Reserve, a monopoly over issuing America's money, and the debt generated by this quasi private corporation is what is killing the American economy. Though the Federal Reserve is now the most powerful central bank in the world, it was not the first. So where did this idea come from? To really understand the magnitude of the problem, we have to travel back to Europe. Just who are these money changers James Madison spoke of? In the bible two thousand years ago, Jesus drove the money changers from the temple. It was the only time Jesus used force during his ministry. What were money changers doing in the temple? When Jews came to Jerusalem to pay their temple tax, they could only pay it with a special coin, the half shekel of the sanctuary. This was a half ounce of pure silver about this size. It was the only coin around at that time which was pure silver and of assured weight without the image of a pagan emperor. Therefore, to Jews, the half shekel was the only coin acceptable to God. But these coins were not plentiful. The money changers had cornered the market on them. Then they raised the price, just like any other commodity, to whatever the market would bear. In other words, money changers were making exorbitant profits because they held a virtual monopoly on money. The Jews had to pay whatever they demanded. To Jesus, this totally violated the sanctity of God's house. But the money changing scam did not originate in Jesus' day. Two hundred years before Christ, Rome was having trouble with money changers. Two early Roman emperors had tried to diminish the power of the money changers by reforming usury laws and limiting land ownership to 500 acres. They were both assassinated. In forty eight BC, Julius Caesar took back the power to coin money from the money changers and minted coins for the benefit of all. With this new plentiful supply of money, he built great public works projects. By making money plentiful, Caesar won the love of the common man, but the money changers hated him. Some believe this was an important factor in Caesar's assassination. One thing is for sure. With the death of Caesar came the demise of plentiful money in Rome. Taxes increased as did corruption. Just as in the case of America today, usury and debased coin became the rule. Eventually, the Roman money supply was reduced by 90%. As a result, the common people lost their lands and their homes, just as is about to happen soon in America. With the demise of plentiful money, the masses lost confidence in the Roman government and refused to support it. Rome plunged into the gloom of the dark ages. A thousand years after the death of Christ, money changers, those who loan out and manipulate the quantity of money, were active in medieval England. In fact, they were so active that acting together they could manipulate the entire English economy. These were not bankers per se. The money changers generally were the goldsmiths. They were the first bankers because they started keeping other people's gold for safekeeping in their vaults. The first paper money was merely a receipt for gold left at the goldsmith. Paper money caught on because it was more convenient than carrying around a lot of heavy gold and silver coins. Eventually goldsmiths noticed that only a small fraction of the depositors ever came in and demanded their gold at any one time. Goldsmiths started cheating on the system. They discovered that they could print more money than they had gold, and usually no one would be the wiser. Then they could loan out this extra money and collect interest on it. This was the birth of fractional reserve banking. That is loaning out many times more money than you have assets on deposit. Deposit. So if a thousand dollars in gold were deposited with them, they could loan out about $10,000 in paper money and draw interest payments on it, and no one would ever discover the deception. By this means, goldsmiths gradually accumulated more and more wealth and used this wealth to accumulate more and more gold. Today, this practice of loaning out more money than there are reserves is known as fractional reserve banking. Every bank in The United States is allowed to loan out at least 10 times more money than they actually have. That's why they get rich on charging let's say 8% interest. It's not really 8% per year which is their income, it's 80%. That's why bank buildings are always the largest in town. But does that mean that all interest or all banking should be illegal? Hardly. In the Middle Ages, canon law, the law of the Catholic Church, forbade charging interest on loans. This concept followed the teachings of Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas. They taught that the purpose of money was to serve the members of society to facilitate the exchange of goods needed to lead a virtuous life. Interest, in their belief, hindered this purpose by putting an unnecessary burden on the use of money. In other words, interest was contrary to reason and justice. Reflecting church law in the Middle Ages, Europe forbade charging interest on loans and made it a crime called usury. As commerce grew and therefore opportunities for investment arose in the late Middle Ages, it came to be recognized that to loan money had a cost for the lender, both in risk and in lost opportunity. So some charges were allowed, but not interest per se. But all moralists, no matter what religion, condemn fraud, oppression of the poor, and injustice is clearly immoral. As we will see, fractional reserve lending is rooted in a fraud, results in widespread poverty, and reduces the value of everyone else's money. The ancient goldsmiths discovered that extra profits could be made by rowing the economy between easy money and tight money. When they made money easier to borrow, then the amount of money in circulation expanded. Money was plentiful. People took out more loans to expand their businesses, But then the money changers would tighten the money supply. They would make loans more difficult to get. What would happen? Just what happens today. A certain percentage of people could not repay their previous loans and could not take out new loans to repay the old ones. Therefore, they went bankrupt and had to sell their assets to the goldsmiths for pennies on the dollar. The same thing is still going on today. Only today, we call this rowing of the economy up and down the business cycle. Like Julius Caesar, King Henry the first of England finally resolved to take the money power away from the goldsmiths about November. Henry could have used anything as money, seashells, feathers, or even yak dung, as is often done in remote Tibetan provinces. But he invented one of the most unusual money systems in history. It was called the tally stick system. Speaker 4: Here I have one of the few surviving examples of this form British money, which lasted seven twenty six years until 1826, a tally stick. The tally system was adopted to avoid the monetary manipulation of the goldsmiths. Speaker 1: Tally sticks were money fabricated out of sticks of polished wood. Notches were cut along one edge of the stick to indicate the denominations. Speaker 4: Then the stick was split lengthwise through the notches so that both pieces, still had a record of the notches. Speaker 1: The king kept one half to protect against counterfeiting. Then he would spend the other half into the economy and they would circulate his money. This particular tally stick is huge. It represented £25,000. 1 of the original stockholders in the Bank of England purchased his original shares with this stick. In other words, he bought shares in the world's richest and most powerful corporation with a stick of wood. It's ironic that after its formation in 1694 the Bank of England attacked the tally stick system because it was money outside the power of the money changers just as King Henry had wanted it to be. Speaker 4: Why do people accept sticks of wood for money? That's a great question. Throughout history, people traded anything they thought had value and used as money. You see, the secret is that money is only what people agree on to use as money. What's our paper money today? It's really just paper. But here's the trick. King Henry ordered that tally sticks had to be used to pay the king's taxes. This built in demand for tally sticks immediately made them circulate and be accepted as money. And they worked well. In fact, no other form of money has worked so well for so long as tally sticks. Speaker 1: Keep in mind, the British Empire was built under the tally stick system. The tally stick system succeeded despite the fact that the money changers constantly attacked it by offering the metal coin system as competition. In other words, metal coins never went completely out of circulation, but tally sticks hung on because they were good for the payment of taxes. Finally, in the fifteen hundreds, King Henry the eighth relaxed the laws concerning usury and the money changers wasted no time reasserting themselves. They quickly made their gold and silver money plentiful for a few decades. But when Queen Mary took the throne and tightened the usury laws again, the money changers renewed the hoarding of gold and silver coins, forcing the economy to plummet. When Queen Mary's sister, Queen Elizabeth I, took the throne, she was determined to regain control over English money. Her solution was to issue gold and silver coins from the public treasury and take the control over the money supply away from the money changers. Although control over money was not the only cause of the English revolution in 1642, religious differences fuelled the conflict, monetary policy played a major role. Financed by the money changers, Oliver Cromwell finally overthrew King Charles, purged the parliament, and put the king to death. The money changers were immediately allowed to consolidate their financial power. The result was that for the next fifty years, the money changers plunged Great Britain into a series of costly wars. They took over a square mile of property in the centre of London known as the City Of London. This area today is still known as one of the three predominant financial centres of the world. Conflicts with the Stuart Kings led the money changers in England to combine with those in The Netherlands to finance the invasion of William of Orange who overthrew the Stuarts in 1688 and took the English throne. By the end of the sixteen hundreds, England was in financial ruin. Fifty years of more or less continuous wars with France and Holland had exhausted her. Frantic government officials met with the money changers to beg for the loans necessary to pursue their political purposes. The price was high, a government sanctioned privately owned bank which could issue money created out of nothing. It was to be the modern world's first privately owned central bank, the Bank of England. Although it was deceptively called the Bank of England to make the general population think it was part of the government, it was not. Like any other private corporation, the Bank of England sold shares to get started. The investors, whose names were never revealed, were supposed to put up 1 and a quarter million British pounds in gold coin to buy their shares in the bank, but only £750,000 was ever received. Despite that, the bank was duly chartered in 1694 and started out in the business of loaning out several times the money it supposedly had in reserves, all at interest. In exchange, the new bank would loan British politicians as much of the new currency as they wanted as long as they secured the debt by direct taxation of the British people. So legalization of the Bank of England amounted to nothing less than legal counterfeiting of a national currency for private gain. Unfortunately, nearly every nation now has a privately controlled central bank using the Bank of England as the basic model. Such is the power of these central banks that they soon take total control over a nation's economy. It soon amounts to nothing but a plutocracy, rule by the rich. It would be like putting control of the army in the hands of the mafia. The danger of tyranny would be extreme. Yes. We need central banks. No. We do not need them in private hands. The central bank scam is really a hidden tax. The nation sells bonds to the central bank to pay for things it does not have the political will to raise taxes to pay for. But the bonds are purchased with money the central bank creates out of nothing. More money in circulation makes your money worth less. The government gets as much money as it needs and the people pay for it in inflation. The beauty of the plan is that not one person in a thousand can figure it out because it's usually hidden behind complex sounding economics gibberish. With the formation of the Bank of England, the nation was soon awash in money. Prices throughout the country doubled. Massive loans were granted for just about any wild scheme. One venture proposed to drain the Red Sea to recover gold supposedly lost when the Egyptian army drowned pursuing Moses and the Israelites. By 1698, government debt grew from the initial 1 and a quarter million pounds to £16,000,000. Naturally, taxes were increased and then increased again to pay for all of this. With the British money supply firmly in their grip, the British economy began a wild roller coaster series of booms and depressions, exactly the sort of thing a central bank claims it is determined to prevent. Speaker 5: There are two things which I think are intrinsic not just to the Bank of England, but central banking generally. The first is an involvement in the formulation of monetary policy with the specific objective of achieving monetary stability. Speaker 1: However, since the Bank of England took control, the British pound has rarely been stable. Now let's take a look at the role of the Rothschild family, the family said to be the wealthiest in the world. You're gone. This is Frankfurt, Germany. 50 Years after the Bank of England opened its doors, a goldsmith named Amshall Moses Bauer opened a coin shop, a counting house in 1743. And over the door, he placed a sign depicting a Roman eagle on a red shield. The shop became known as the Red Shield Firm or in German Rothschild. When his son, Amschel Meyer Bauer, inherited the business, he decided to change his name to Rothschild. Amshall soon learned that loaning money to governments and kings was more profitable than loaning to private individuals. Not only were the loans bigger, but they were secured by the nation's taxes. Mayor Rothschild had five sons. He trained them all in the skills of money creation, then sent them out to the major capitals of Europe to open branch offices of the family banking business. His first son, Amsho Mayer, stayed in Frankfurt to mine the hometown bank. His second son, Solomon, was sent to Vienna. His third son, Nathan, was clearly the most clever. He was sent to London at age 21 in 1798, a hundred years after the founding of the Bank of England. His fourth son, Carl, went to Naples, and his fifth son, Jacob, went to Paris. In 1785, Mayor Amshel moved his entire family to this larger house, a five story dwelling he shared with the Schiff family. This house was known as the Green Shield. The Rothschilds and the Schiffs would play a central role in the rest of European financial history and in that of The United States. The Rothschilds broke into dealings with European royalty here at Williamshall, the palace of the wealthiest man in Germany. In fact, the wealthiest monarch in all Europe, Prince William Of Hesse Cassel. At first, the Rothschilds were only helping William speculate in precious coins. But when Napoleon chased Prince William into exile, he sent £550,000, a gigantic sum at that time, to Nathan Rothschild in London with instructions for him to buy consols, British government bonds, also called government stock. But Rothschild used the money for his own purposes. With Napoleon on the loose, the opportunities of wartime investments were nearly limitless. William returned here sometime prior to the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. He summoned Rothschild and demanded his money back. The Rothschilds returned William's money with the interest the British consuls would have paid him had the investment actually been made. But the Rothchilds kept all the past profits they had made using William's money. Nathan Rothschild later bragged that in the seventeen years he'd been in England, he'd increased his original £20,000 stake given to him by his father by 2,500 times. By cooperating within the family, the Rothschild soon grew unbelievably wealthy. By the mid eighteen hundreds, they dominated all European banking and were certainly the wealthiest family in the world. They financed Cecil Rhodes, making it possible for him to establish a monopoly over the diamond and gold fields of South Africa. In America, they financed the Harriman's and railroads, the Vanderbilt's and railroads and the press, and Carnegie and the steel industry, among many others. In fact, during World War I, J. P. Morgan was thought to be the richest man in America. But after his death, it was discovered that he was actually only a lieutenant of the Rothschilds. Once Morgan's will was made public, it was discovered that he owned only 19% of JPMorgan companies. By 1850, James Rothschild, the heir of the French branch of the family, was said to be worth 600,000,000 French francs, 1 hundred and 50 million more than all the other bankers in France put together. He built this mansion called Ferrier, just East of Paris. Wilhelm The First on scene had exclaimed, kings couldn't afford this. It could only belong to a Rothschild. Another nineteenth century French commentator put it this way. There is but one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild. There is no evidence that their predominant standing in European or world finance has changed. Now let's take a look at the results the Bank of England had produced on the British economy and how that later was the root cause of the American Revolution. By the mid seventeen hundreds, the British Empire was nearing its height of power around the world. But Britain had fought four costly wars in Europe since the creation of their privately owned central bank, the Bank of England. The cost had been high. To finance these wars, the British parliament here had borrowed heavily from the bank. By the mid seventeen hundreds, the government's debt here in Britain was a hundred and £40,000,000, a staggering sum for those days. Consequently, the British government embarked on a program of trying to raise revenues from their American colonies in order to make their interest payments to the bank. But in America, it was a different story. The scourge of a privately owned central bank had not yet hit. This is Independence Hall in Philadelphia, where the Declaration of Independence and Constitution were signed. In the mid seventeen hundreds, pre revolutionary America was still relatively poor. There was a severe shortage of precious metal coins to trade for goods, so the early colonists were forced to experiment with printing their own homegrown paper money. Some of these experiments were successful. Franklin was a big supporter of the colonies printing their own paper money. In 1757, Franklin was sent to London. He ended up staying for the next eighteen years here, nearly until the start of the American Revolution. During this period, the American colonies began to issue their own money. Called colonial scrip, the endeavor was very successful. It provided a reliable medium of exchange, and it also helped to provide a feeling of unity between the colonies. Remember, colonial scrip was just paper money, debt free money printed in the public interest and not backed by gold or silver coin. In other words, it was a totally fiat currency. One day, officials of the Bank of England asked Franklin how he would account for the newfound prosperity of the colonies. Without hesitation, he replied. Speaker 0: That is simple. In the colonies, we issue our own money. It is called colonial scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one. Speaker 1: This was just common sense to Franklin, but you can imagine the impact it had on the Bank of England. America had learned the secret of money, and that genie had to be returned to its bottle as soon as possible. As a result, parliament hurriedly passed the Currency Act of 1764. This prohibited colonial officials from issuing their own money and ordered them to pay all future taxes in gold or silver coins. In other words, it forced the colonies on a gold or silver standard. For those who still believe that a gold standard is the answer for America's current monetary problems, look what happened to America after that. Writing in his autobiography, Franklin said Speaker 0: In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended and a depression set in to such an extent that the streets of the colonies were filled with unemployed. Speaker 1: Franklin claims that this was even the basic cause for the American Revolution. As Franklin put it in his autobiography Speaker 0: The colonies would gladly have borne a little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of the colonists to get the power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George the third and the international bankers was the prime reason for the revolutionary war. Speaker 1: By the time the first shots were fired in Lexington, Massachusetts on 04/19/1775, the colonies had been drained of gold and silver coin by British taxation. As a result, the continental government had no choice but to print money to finance the war. At the start of the revolution, the US money supply stood at $12,000,000. By the end of the war, it was nearly 500,000,000. As a result, the currency was virtually worthless. Shoes sold for $5,000 a pair. Colonial scrip had worked because just enough was issued to facilitate trade. As George Washington lamented, a wagonload of money will scarcely purchase a wagonload of provisions. Today, those who support a gold backed currency point to this period during the revolution to demonstrate the evils of a fiat currency. But remember, the same currency had worked so well twenty years earlier during times of peace that the Bank of England had parliament outlawed. Towards the end of the revolution, the Continental Congress meeting here at Independence Hall grew desperate for money. In 1781, they allowed Robert Morris, their financial superintendent, to open a privately owned central bank. Incidentally, Morris was a wealthy man who had grown wealthier during the revolution by trading in war materials. Called the Bank of North America, the new bank was closely modeled after the Bank of England. It was allowed to practice fractional reserve banking. That is, it could lend out money it didn't have, then charge interest on it. If you or I were to do that, we would be charged with fraud, a felony. The bank's charter called for private investors to put up $400,000 worth of initial capital. But when Morris was unable to raise the money, he brazenly used his political influence to have gold deposited in the bank, which had been loaned to America by France. He then loaned this money to himself and his friends to reinvest in shares of the bank. And like the Bank of England, the bank was given a monopoly over the national currency. Soon the dangers became clear. The value of American currency continued to plummet. So four years later, in 1785, the bank's charter was not renewed. The leader of the effort to kill the bank, William Findley of Pennsylvania, explained the problem this way. Quote, this institution, having no principle but that of avarice, will never be varied in its object to engross all the wealth, power, and influence of the state. The men behind the Bank of North America, Alexander Hamilton, Robert Morris, and the bank's president, Thomas Wiling, did not give up. Only six years later, Hamilton, then secretary of the treasury, and his mentor, Morris, rammed a new privately owned central bank through the new congress. Called the first bank of The United States, Thomas Wiling again served as the bank's president. The players were the same, only the name of the bank was changed. In 1787, colonial leaders assembled in Philadelphia to replace the ailing Articles of Confederation. As we saw earlier, both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were unalterably opposed to a privately owned central bank. They had seen the problems caused by the Bank of England. They wanted nothing of it. As Jefferson later put it if the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations which grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. During the debate over the future monetary system, another one of the founding fathers, Gouverneur Morris, castigated the motivations of the owners of the Bank of North America. Gouverneur Morris headed the committee that wrote the final draft of the constitution. Morris knew the motivations of the bank well. Along with his old boss, Robert Morris, Gouverneur Morris and Alexander Hamilton were the ones who had presented the original plan for the Bank of North America to the Continental Congress in the last year of the revolution. In a letter he wrote to James Madison on 07/02/1787, Gouverneur Morris revealed what was really going on. Speaker 0: The rich will strive to establish their dominion and enslave the rest. They always did. They always will. They will have the same effect here as elsewhere if we do not, by the power of government, keep them in their proper spheres. Speaker 1: Despite the defection of Gouverneur Morris from the ranks of the bank, Hamilton, Robert Morris, Thomas Wiling, and their European backers were not about to give up. They convinced the bulk of the delegates to the Constitutional Convention to not give Congress the power to issue paper money. Most of the delegates were still reeling from the wild inflation of the paper currency during the revolution. They had forgotten how well colonial scrip had worked before the war. But the Bank of England had not. The money changers could not stand to have America printing her own money again. So the constitution is silent on the matter. This grievous defect left the door wide open for the money changers just as they had planned. In 1790, less than three years after the constitution had been signed, the money changers struck again. The newly appointed first secretary of the treasury, Alexander Hamilton, proposed a bill to the congress calling for a new privately owned central bank. Coincidentally, that was the very year that Amschel Rothschild made his pronouncement from his flagship bank in Frankfurt. Let me issue and control a nation's money, and I care not who writes the laws. Speaker 0: Alexander Hamilton was a tool of the international bankers, and he wanted to create the US Bank, the BUS, or the Bank of the United States, and did so. Speaker 1: Interestingly, one of Hamilton's first jobs after graduating from law school in 1782 was as an aide to Robert Morris, the head of the Bank of North America. In fact, the year before, Hamilton had written Morris a letter saying, a national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing. A blessing to whom? After a year of intense debate, in 1791, Congress passed the bill and gave it a twenty year charter. The new bank was to be called the First Bank of the United States or BUS. Here we are in front of the first bank of the United States in Philadelphia. The bank was given a monopoly on printing US currency even though 80% of its stock would be held by private investors. The other 20% would be purchased by the US government. But the reason was not to give the government a piece of the action. It was to provide the capital for the other 80% owners. As with the old Bank of North America and the Bank of England before that, the stockholders never paid the full amount for their shares. The US government put up their initial $2,000,000 in cash, then the bank, through the old magic of fractional reserve lending, made loans to its charter investors so they could come up with the remaining $8,000,000 of capital needed for this risk free investment. Like the Bank of England, the name of the Bank of the United States was deliberately chosen to hide the fact that it was privately controlled. And like the Bank of England, the names of the investors in the bank were never revealed. Many years later, it was a common saying that the Rothschilds were the power behind the old Bank of the United States. The bank was sold to Congress as a way to bring stability to the banking system and eliminate inflation. So what happened? Over the first five years, the US government borrowed $8,200,000 from the Bank of the United States. In the same five year period, prices rose by 72%. Jefferson, as the new secretary of state, watched the borrowing with sadness and frustration, unable to stop it. Speaker 0: I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our constitution taking from the federal government the power of borrowing. Speaker 1: Millions of Americans feel the same way today. They watch in helpless frustration as the federal government borrows economy into oblivion. So although it was called the first bank of The United States, it was not the first attempt at a privately owned central bank in this country. As with the Bank of North America, the government put up most of the cash to get this private bank going, then the bankers loaned the money to each other to buy the remaining stock in the bank. It was a scam plain and simple, and they wouldn't be able to get away with it for long. But first, we have to travel back to Europe to see how a single man was able to manipulate the entire British economy by obtaining the first news of Napoleon's final defeat. Here in Paris, the Bank of France was organized in 1800 just like the Bank of England. But Napoleon decided France had to break free of debt, and he never trusted the Bank of France. He declared that when a government is dependent upon bankers for money, the bankers, not the leaders of the government, are in control. Speaker 0: The hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland. Financiers are without patriotism and without decency. Their sole object is gain. Speaker 1: Back in America, unexpected help was about to arrive. In 1800, Thomas Jefferson narrowly defeated John Adams to become the third president of The United States. By eighteen o three, Jefferson and Napoleon had struck a deal. The US would give Napoleon three million dollars in gold in exchange for a huge chunk of territory west of the Mississippi River, the Louisiana Purchase. With that $3,000,000, Napoleon quickly forged an army and set off across Europe, conquering everything in his path. But the Bank of England quickly rose to oppose him. They financed every nation in his path reaping the enormous profits of war. Prussia, Austria, and finally Russia all went heavily into debt in a futile attempt to stop Napoleon. Four years later, with the main French army in Russia, Thirty year old Nathan Rothschild, the head of the London office of the Rothschild family, personally took charge of a bold plan to smuggle a much needed shipment of gold right through France to finance an attack by the Duke of Wellington from Spain. Nathan later bragged at a dinner party in London that it was the best business he'd ever done. Little did he know that he would do much better business in the near future. Wellington's attacks from the South and other defeats eventually forced Napoleon to abdicate, and Louis the eighteenth was crowned king. Napoleon was exiled to Elba, a tiny island off the coast of Italy, supposedly exiled from France forever. While Napoleon was in exile on Elba temporarily defeated by England with the financial help of the Rothschilds, America was trying to break free of its central bank as well. In 1811, a bill was put before congress to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States. The debate grew very heated, and the legislatures of both Pennsylvania and Virginia passed resolutions asking congress to kill the bank. The press corps of the day attacked the bank openly, calling it a great swindle, a vulture, a viper, and a cobra. Oh, to have an independent press once again in America. A congressman named PB Porter attacked the bank from the floor of congress, saying if the bank's charter was renewed, congress, quote, will have planted in the bosom of this constitution of Viper, which one day or another will sting the liberties of this country to the heart, close quote. Prospects didn't look that good for the bank. Some writers have even claimed that Nathan Rothschild warned that The United States would find itself involved in a most disastrous war if the bank's charter were not renewed. But it wasn't enough. When the smoke had cleared, the renewal bill was defeated by a single vote in the house and was deadlocked in the senate. By now, America's Fourth President, James Madison, was in the White House. Remember, Madison was a staunch opponent of the bank. His vice president, George Clinton, broke a tie in the senate and sent the bank into oblivion. Within five months, England attacked The US, and the war of eighteen twelve was on. But the British were still busy fighting Napoleon, and so the war of eighteen twelve ended in a draw in 1814. Though the money changers were temporarily down, they were far from out. It would take them only another two years to bring back their bank bigger and stronger than ever. But now let's return to Napoleon because nothing else in history more aptly demonstrates the ingenuity of the Rothschild family than their control of the British stock market after Waterloo. In 1815, a year after the end of the war of eighteen twelve in America, Napoleon escaped his exile and returned to Paris. French troops were sent out to capture him, but such was his charisma that the soldiers rallied around their old leader and hailed him as their emperor once again. In March of eighteen fifteen, Napoleon equipped an army which Britain's Duke Of Wellington defeated less than ninety days later at Waterloo. Some writers claim Napoleon borrowed £5,000,000 from the Bank of England to rearm, but it appears these funds actually came from the Ouvard banking house in Paris. Nevertheless, from about this point on, it was not unusual for privately controlled central banks to finance both sides in a war. Why would a central bank finance opposing sides in a war? Because war is the biggest debt generator of them all. A nation will borrow any amount for victory. The ultimate loser is loaned just enough to hold out the vain hope of victory, and the ultimate winner is given enough to win. Besides, such loans are usually conditioned upon the guarantee that the victor will honor the debts of the vanquished. This is the Waterloo Battlefield about 200 miles northeast of Paris in what today is Belgium. Here, Napoleon suffered his final defeat, but not before thousands of French and Englishmen gave their lives on a steamy summer day in July of eighteen fifteen. Right over there, on June 4000 French troops met 67,000 troops from Britain and other European nations. The outcome was certainly in doubt. In fact, had Napoleon attacked a few hours earlier, he would probably have won the battle. But no matter who won or lost back in London, Nathan Rothschild planned to use the opportunity to try to seize control over the British stock and bond market and possibly even the Bank of England. Rothschild stationed a trusted agent, a man named Rothworth, on the north side of the battlefield closer to the English Channel. Once the battle had been decided, Rothworth took off for the channel. He delivered the news to Nathan Rothschild a full twenty four hours before Wellington's own courier. Rothschild hurried to the stock market and took up his usual position in front of an ancient pillar. All eyes were on him. The Rothschilds had a legendary communications network. If Wellington had been defeated and Napoleon was loose on the continent again, Britain's financial situation would become grave indeed. Rothschild looked saddened. He stood there motionless, eyes downcast. Then suddenly he began selling. Other nervous investors saw that Rothchild was selling. It could only mean one thing. Napoleon must have won, Wellington must have lost. The market plummeted. Soon everyone was selling their consoles, their British government bonds, and prices dropped sharply. But then Rothschild started secretly buying up the consoles through his agents for only a fraction of their worth hours before. Myths, legends, you say? 100 later, the New York Times ran a story which said that Nathan's grandson had attempted to secure a court order to suppress a book with this stock market story in it. The Rothschild family claimed the story was untrue and libelous, but the court denied the Rothschild's request and ordered the family to pay all court costs. What's even more interesting about this story is that some authors claim that the day after the Battle of Waterloo, in a matter of hours, Nathan Rothschild came to dominate not only the bond market but the Bank of England as well. Whether or not the Rothschild family seized control of the Bank of England, the first privately owned central bank in a major European nation and the wealthiest, one thing is certain, by the mid-eighteen hundreds the Rothschilds were the richest family in the world bar none. They dominated the new government bond markets and branched into other banks and industrial concerns. In fact, the rest of the nineteenth century was known as the age of the Rothschilds. Despite this overwhelming wealth, the family has generally cultivated an aura of invisibility. Although the family controls scores of industrial, commercial, mining, and tourist corporations, only a handful bear the Rothschild name. By the end of the nineteenth century, one expert estimated that the Rothschild family controlled half the wealth of the world. Whatever the extent of their vast wealth, it is reasonable to assume that their percentage of the world's wealth has increased since then. But since the turn of the century, the Rothschilds have cultivated the notion that their power has somehow waned even as their wealth increases. Meanwhile, back in Washington in 1816, just one year after Waterloo and Rothschild's alleged takeover of the Bank of England, the American Congress passed a bill permitting yet another privately owned central bank. This bank was called the second bank of the United States. The new bank's charter was a copy of the previous banks. The US government would own 20% of the shares of the bank. Of course, the federal share was paid by the treasury up front into the bank's coffers. Then through the magic of fractional reserve lending, it was transformed into loans to private investors who then bought the remaining 80% of the shares. Just as before, the primary stockholders remained a secret. But it is known that the largest block of shares, about one third of the total, were sold to foreigners. As one observer put it, it is certainly no exaggeration to say that the second bank of the United States was rooted as deeply in Britain as it was in America. So by 1816, some authors claim the Rothschilds had taken control over the Bank of England and backed a new privately owned central bank in America as well. After twelve years of manipulations of The US economy on the part of the second bank of the US, the American people had had just about enough. Opponents of the bank nominated a dignified senator from Tennessee, Andrew Jackson, the hero of the battle of New Orleans to run for president. This is his home, the Hermitage. No one gave Jackson a chance initially. The bank had long ago learned how the political process could be controlled with money. To the surprise and dismay of the money changers, Jackson was swept into office in 1828. Jackson was determined to kill the bank at the first opportunity and wasted no time in trying to do so. But the bank's twenty year charter didn't come up for renewal until 1836, the last year of his second term if he could survive that long. During his first term, Jackson contented himself with rooting out the bank's many minions from government service. He fired 2,000 of the 11,000 employees of the federal government. In 1832, with his reelection approaching, the bank struck an early blow, hoping Jackson would not want to stir up controversy. They asked Congress to pass a renewal bill four years early. Naturally, Congress complied, then sent it to the president for signing. But Jackson weighed in with both feet. Old Hickory, never a coward, vetoed the bill. His veto message is one of the great American documents. It clearly lays out the responsibility of the American government towards its citizens, rich and poor. Speaker 0: It is not our own citizens only who are to receive the bounty of our government. More than 8 millions of the stock of this bank are held by foreigners. Is there no danger to our liberty and independence in a bank that in its nature has so little to bind it to our country? Controlling our currency, receiving our public monies, and holding thousands of our citizens independence would be more formidable and dangerous than a military power of the enemy. If government would confine itself to equal protection and, as heaven does its rains, shower its favor alike on the high and the low, the rich and the poor, it would be an unqualified blessing. In the act before me, there seems to be a wide and unnecessary departure from these just principles. Speaker 1: Later that year, in July 1832, Congress was unable to override Jackson's veto. Now Jackson had to stand for reelection. Jackson took his argument directly to the people. For the first time in US history, Jackson took his presidential campaign on the road. Before then, presidential candidates stayed at home and looked presidential. His campaign slogan was Jackson and no bank. The National Republican Party ran senator Henry Clay against Jackson. Despite the fact that the bankers poured over $3,000,000 into Clay's campaign, Jackson was reelected by a landslide in November of eighteen thirty two. Despite his presidential victory, Jackson knew the battle was only beginning. The hydra of corruption is only scotched, not dead, said the newly elected president. Jackson ordered his new secretary of treasury, Louis McLean, to start removing the government's deposits from the second bank and start placing them in state banks. But McLean refused to do so. Jackson fired him and appointed William j Dewayne as the new secretary of the treasury. Dewayne also refused to comply with the president's requests, and so Jackson fired him as well and then appointed Roger b Taney to the office. Taney did withdraw government funds from the bank starting on 10/01/1833. Jackson was jubilant. I have it chained. I'm ready with screws to draw every tooth and then the stumps, but the bank was not yet done fighting. Its head, Nicholas Biddle, used his influence to get the senate to reject Taney's nomination. Then in a rare show of arrogance, Biddle threatened to cause a depression if the bank was not rechartered. Speaker 0: This worthy president thinks that because he has scalped Indians and imprisoned judges, he is to have his way with the bank, he is mistaken. Speaker 1: Next, in an unbelievable fit of honesty for a central banker, Biddle admitted that the bank was going to make money scarce to force congress to restore the bank. Speaker 0: Nothing but widespread suffering will produce any effect on congress. Our only safety is in pursuing a steady course of firm restriction, and I have no doubt that such a course will ultimately lead to restoration of the currency and the recharter of the bank. Speaker 1: What a stunning revelation. Here was the pure truth revealed with shocking clarity. Biddle intended to use the money contraction power of the bank to cause a massive depression until America gave in. Unfortunately, this has happened time and time again throughout US history and is about to happen again in today's world. Nicholas Biddle made good on his threat. The bank sharply contracted the money supply by calling in old loans and refusing to extend new ones. A financial panic ensued followed by a deep depression. Naturally, Biddle blamed Jackson for the crash, saying that it was caused by the withdrawal of federal funds from the bank. Unfortunately, his plan worked well. Wages and prices sagged. Unemployment soared along with business bankruptcies. The nation quickly went into an uproar. Newspaper editors blasted Jackson in editorials. The bank threatened to withhold payments, which then could be made directly to key politicians for their support. Within only months, congress assembled in what was called the panic session. Six months after he had withdrawn funds from the bank, Jackson was officially censured by a resolution which passed the senate by a vote of 26 to 20. It was the first time a president had ever been censured by congress. Jackson lashed out at the bank. You are a den of vipers. I intend to route you out, and by eternal god, I will route you out. America's fate teetered on a knife edge. If congress could muster enough votes to override Jackson's veto, the bank would be granted another twenty year monopoly or more over America's money, time enough to consolidate its already great power. Then a miracle occurred. The governor of Pennsylvania came out supporting president Jackson and strongly criticized the bank. On top of that, Biddle had been caught boasting in public about the bank's plan to crash the economy. Suddenly, the tide shifted. In April of eighteen thirty four, the House of Representatives voted one thirty four to 82 against rechartering the bank. This was followed up by an even more lopsided vote to establish a special committee to investigate whether the bank had caused the crash. When the investigating committee arrived at the bank store in Philadelphia, armed with a subpoena to examine the books, Biddle refused to give them up, nor would he allow inspection of correspondence with congressmen relating to their personal loans and advances he'd made to them. He also refused to testify before the committee back in Washington. On 01/08/1835, Jackson paid off the final installment on the national debt, which had been necessitated by allowing the banks to issue currency for government bonds rather than simply issuing treasury notes without such debt. He was the only president to ever pay off the debt. A few weeks later on 01/30/1835, an assassin by the name of Richard Lawrence tried to shoot president Jackson, but by the grace of God, both pistols misfired. Lawrence was later found not guilty by reason of insanity. After his release, he bragged to friends that powerful people in Europe had put him up to the task and promised to protect him if he were caught. The following year, when its charter ran out, the second bank of the United States ceased functioning as the nation's central bank. Biddle was later arrested and charged with fraud. He was tried and acquitted, but died shortly thereafter while still tied up in civil suits. After his second term as president, Jackson retired here to the hermitage outside of Nashville to live out his life. He is still remembered here for his determination to kill the bank. In fact, he killed it so well that it took the money changers seventy seven years to undo the damage. When asked what his most important accomplishment had been, Jackson replied, I killed the bank. Unfortunately, even Jackson failed to grasp the entire picture and its root cause. Although Jackson had killed the central bank, the most insidious weapon of the money changers, fractional reserve banking, remained in use by the numerous state chartered banks. This fueled economic instability in the years before the civil war. Still, the central bankers were out, and as a result, America thrived as it expanded westward. During this time, the principal money changers struggled to regain their lost centralized power, but to no avail. Then finally, they reverted to the old central bankers formula, war to create debt and dependency. If they couldn't get their central bank any other way, America could be brought to its knees by plunging it into a civil war just as they had done in 1812 after the first bank of the United States was not rechartered. One month after the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln, the first shots of the American Civil War were fired here at Fort Sumter, South Carolina on 04/12/1861. Certainly slavery was a cause for the Civil War, but not the primary cause. Lincoln knew that the economy of the South depended upon slavery, and so before the civil war, he had no intention of eliminating it. Lincoln had put it this way in his inaugural address only one month earlier. Speaker 0: I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so. Speaker 1: Even after the first shots were fired here at Fort Sumter, Lincoln continued to insist that the civil war was not about the issue of slavery. Speaker 0: My paramount objective is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the union without freeing any slave, I would do it. Speaker 1: So what was the civil war all about? There were many factors at play. Northern industrialists had used protective tariffs to prevent the Southern states from buying cheaper European goods. Europe retaliated by stopping cotton imports from the South. The Southern states were in a double financial bind. They were forced to pay more for most of the necessities of life while their income from cotton exports plummeted. The South was angry. But there were other factors at work. The money changers were still stung by America's withdrawal from their control twenty five years earlier. Since then, America's wild cat economy had made the nation rich, a bad example for the rest of the world. The central bankers now saw an opportunity to split the rich new nation, to divide and conquer by war. Was this just some sort of wild conspiracy theory at the time? Well, let's take a look at what a well placed observer of the scene had to say at the time. His name was Otto von Bismarck, chancellor of Germany, the man who united the German states a few years later. The division of The United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the civil war by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that The United States, if they remained as one bloc and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence which would upset their financial domination over the world. Within months after the first shots here at Fort Sumter, the central bankers loaned Napoleon the third of France, the nephew of the Waterloo Napoleon, Two Hundred And Ten Million Francs to seize Mexico and station troops along the southern border of The US taking advantage of their war to violate the Monroe Doctrine and return Mexico to colonial rule. No matter what the outcome of the civil war, a weakened America heavily indebted to the money changers would open up Central And South America once again to European colonization and domination. The very thing America's Monroe Doctrine had forbade in 1823. At the same time, Great Britain moved 11,000 troops into Canada and positioned them menacingly along America's northern border. The British fleet went to war alert should their quick intervention be called for. Lincoln knew he was in a double bind. That's why he agonized over the fate of the union. There was a lot more to it than just differences between the North and the South. That's why his emphasis was always on union and not merely the defeat of the South. But Lincoln needed money to win. In 1861, Lincoln and his secretary of treasury, Salmon p Chase, went to New York to apply for the necessary loans. The money changers, anxious to see the union fail, offered loans at 24 to 36% interest. Lincoln said thanks, but no thanks, and returned to Washington. Lincoln sent for an old friend, colonel Dick Taylor of Chicago, and put him on the problem of financing the war. During one meeting, Lincoln asked Taylor what he discovered. Taylor put it this way. Why, Lincoln, that is easy. Just get Congress to pass a bill authorizing the printing of full legal tender treasury notes And pay your soldiers with them and go ahead and win your war with them also. When Lincoln asked if the people of The United States would accept the notes, Taylor said, the people or anyone else will not have any choice in the matter if you make them full legal tender. They will have the full sanction of the government and be just as good as any money as Congress is given that express right by the constitution. So that's exactly what Lincoln did. In eighteen sixty two, sixty three, he printed up $450,000,000 worth of the new bills. In order to distinguish them from other banknotes in circulation, he printed them in green ink on the backside. That's why the notes were called greenbacks. With this new money, Lincoln paid the troops and bought their supplies. During the course of the war, nearly $450,000,000 worth of greenbacks were printed at no interest to the federal government. Lincoln understood who was really pulling the strings strings and what was at stake for the American people. This is how he explained his rationale. Speaker 0: The government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government, but it is the government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be mastered and become the servant of humanity. Speaker 1: A truly incredible editorial in the London Times explained the central bankers' attitude towards Lincoln's greenbacks. Speaker 0: If this mischievous financial policy, has its origins in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe. Speaker 1: The scheme was effective. So effective that the next year, 1863, with federal and confederate troops beginning to mass for the decisive battle of the civil war and the treasury in need of further congressional authority to issue more greenbacks, Lincoln allowed the bankers to push through the National Bank Act. These new national banks would operate under a virtual tax free status and collectively have the exclusive monopoly power to create the new form of money, banknotes. Though greenbacks continued to circulate, their numbers were not increased. But most importantly, from this point on, the entire US money supply would be created out of debt by bankers buying US Government bonds and issuing them for reserves for banknotes. As historian John Kenneth Galbraith explained it Speaker 0: In numerous years following the war, the federal government ran a heavy surplus. It could not, however, pay off its debt, retire its securities because to do so meant there would be no bonds to back the national banknotes. To pay off the debt was to destroy the money supply. Speaker 1: Later in 1863, Lincoln got some unexpected help from czar Alexander the second of Russia. The czar, like Bismarck in Germany, knew what the international money changers were up to and had steadfastly refused to let them set up a central bank in Russia. If America survived and was able to remain out of their clutches, the czar's position would remain secure. If the bankers were successful at dividing America and giving the pieces back to Great Britain and France, both nations under control of their central banks, eventually, they would threaten Russia again. So the czar gave orders that if either England or France actively intervened and gave aid to the South, Russia would consider such action as a declaration of war. He did the same with part of his Pacific fleet and sent them to port in San Francisco. Lincoln was reelected the next year, eighteen sixty four. Had he lived, he would surely have killed the national bank's money monopoly extracted from him during the war. On 11/21/1864, he wrote a friend the following. Speaker 0: The money power preys upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. Speaker 1: Shortly before Lincoln was murdered, his former secretary of treasury, Salmon p Chase, bemoaned his role in helping secure the passage of the National Banking Act only one year earlier. Speaker 0: My agency in promoting the passage of the National Banking Act was the greatest financial mistake in my life. It has built up a monopoly which affects every interest in the country. Speaker 1: On April after his second inauguration and just five days after Lee surrendered to Grant at Appomattox, Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth at Ford's Theatre. Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany, lamented the death of Abraham Lincoln. Speaker 0: The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in The United States great enough to wear his boots. I fear that foreign bankers with their craftiness and torturous tricks will entirely corrupt the exuberant riches of America and use it systematically to corrupt modern civilization. They will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos in order that the earth should become their inheritance. Speaker 1: Bismarck well understood the money changers' plan. Allegations that international bankers were responsible for Lincoln's assassination surfaced in Canada Seventy Years later in 1934. Gerald g McGeer, a popular and well respected Canadian attorney, revealed this stunning charge in a five hour speech before the Canadian House of Commons blasting Canada's debt based money system. Remember, it was 1934, the height of the Great Depression, which was ravaging Canada as well. McGeer had obtained evidence deleted from the public record provided to him by Secret Service agents at the trial of John Wilkes Booth, after Booth's death. McGeer said it showed that Booth was a mercenary working for the international bankers. According to an article in the Vancouver Sun of 05/02/1934 Speaker 0: Abraham Lincoln, the martyred emancipator of the slaves, was assassinated through the machinations of a group representative of the international bankers who feared The United States President's national credit ambitions. There was only one group in the world at that time who had any reason to desire the death of Lincoln. They were the men opposed to his national currency program and who had fought him throughout the whole civil war on his policy of greenback currency. Speaker 1: Interestingly, McGeer claimed that Lincoln was assassinated not only because international bankers wanted to reestablish a central bank in America, but because they also wanted to base America's currency on gold, gold they controlled. In other words, put America on a gold standard. Lincoln had done just the opposite by issuing US notes, greenbacks, which were based purely on the good faith and credit of The United States. The article quoted McGeer as saying Speaker 0: They were the men interested in the establishment of the gold standard and the right of the bankers to manage the currency and credit of every nation in the world. With Lincoln out of the way, they were able to proceed with that plan and did proceed with it in The United States. Within eight years after Lincoln's assassination, silver was demonetized and the gold standard money system set up in The United States. Speaker 1: Not since Lincoln has The US issued debt free United States notes. These red sealed bills, which were issued in 1963, were not a new issue from president Kennedy, but merely the old greenbacks reissued year after year. In another act of folly and ignorance, the 1994 Regal Act actually authorized the replacement of Lincoln's greenbacks with debt based notes. In other words, greenbacks were in circulation in The United States until 1994. Why was silver bad for the bankers and gold good? Simple. Because silver was plentiful in The United States. It was very hard to control. Gold was and always has been scarce. Throughout history, it has been relatively easy to monopolize gold, but silver has historically been 15 times more plentiful. With Lincoln out of the way, the money changers' next objective was to gain complete control over America's money. This was no easy task. With the opening of the American West, silver had been discovered in huge quantities. On top of that, Lincoln's greenbacks were generally popular. Despite the European Central Bankers' deliberate attacks on greenbacks, they continued to circulate in The United States, in fact, until a few years ago. According to historian w Cleon Skousen Speaker 0: Right after the civil war, there was considerable talk about reviving Lincoln's brief experiment with the constitutional monetary system. Had not the European Money Trust intervened, it would have no doubt become an established institution. Speaker 1: It is clear that the concept of America printing her own debt free money sent shock waves throughout the European central banking elite. They watched with horror as Americans clamored for more greenbacks. They may have killed Lincoln, but support for his monetary ideas grew. On 04/12/1866, nearly one year to the day of Lincoln's assassination, congress went to work at the bidding of the European Central Banking interests. It passed the contraction act authorizing the secretary of the treasury to begin to retire some of the greenbacks in circulation and thereby contract the money supply. Authors Theodore R. Thorin and Richard F. Warner explained the results of the money contraction in their classic book on the subject, the truth in money book. Speaker 0: The hard times which occurred after the civil war could have been avoided if the greenback legislation had continued as president Lincoln had intended. Instead, there were a series of money panics, what we call recessions, which put pressure on congress to enact legislation to place the banking system under centralized control. Eventually, the Federal Reserve Act was passed on 12/23/1913. Speaker 1: In other words, the money changers wanted two things, the reinstitution of a central bank under their exclusive control, and two, an American currency backed by gold. Their strategy was twofold. First of all, cause a series of panics to try to convince the American people that only centralized control of the money supply could provide economic stability. And secondly, remove so much money from the system that most Americans would be so desperately poor that they either wouldn't care or would be too weak to oppose the bankers. In 1866, there was $1,800,000,000 in currency in circulation in The United States, about $50.46 per capita. In 1867 alone, half a billion dollars, 5 hundred million dollars, was removed from The US money supply. Ten years later, in 1876, America's money supply was reduced to only 600,000,000. In other words, two thirds of America's money had been called in by the bankers. Only $14.60 per capita remained in circulation. Ten years later, the money supply had been reduced to only $400,000,000, even though the population had boomed. The result was that only $6.67 per capita remained in circulation, a 760% loss in buying power over twenty years. Today, economists try to sell the idea that recessions and depressions are a natural part of something they call the business cycle. The truth is our money supply is manipulated now just as it was before and after the civil war. How did this happen? How did money become so scarce? Simple. Bank loans were called in, and no new ones were given. In addition, silver coins were melted down. In 1872, a man named Ernest Said was given a hundred thousand pounds, about $500,000, by the Bank of England and sent to America to bribe necessary congressmen to get silver demonetized. He was told that if that was not sufficient to draw an additional hundred thousand pounds or as much more as was necessary. The next year, congress passed the coinage act of 1873, and the minting of silver dollars abruptly stopped. In fact, representative Samuel Hooper, who introduced the bill in the house, acknowledged that mister Sad actually drafted the legislation. But it gets even worse than that. In 1874, Sad himself admitted who was behind the scheme. Speaker 0: I went to America in the winter of eighteen seventy two, seventy three authorized to secure, if I could, the passage of a building monetizing silver. It was in the interest of those I represented, the governors of the Bank of England, to have it done. By 1873, gold coins were the only form of coin money. Speaker 1: But the contest over control of America's money was not yet over. Only three years later in 1876, with one third of America's workforce unemployed, the population was growing restless. People were clamoring for a return to the greenback money system of president Lincoln or a return to silver money, anything that would make money more plentiful. That year, congress created the United States Silver Commission to study the problem. Their report clearly blamed the monetary contraction on the national bankers. Interesting because it compares the deliberate money contraction by the national bankers after the civil war to the fall of the Roman Empire. Speaker 0: The disaster of the dark ages was caused by decreasing money and falling prices. Without money, civilization could not have had a beginning. And with a diminishing supply, it must languish and unless relieved, finally perish. At the Christian era, the metallic money of the Roman Empire amounted to $1,800,000,000. By the end of the fifteenth century, it had shrunk to less than $200,000,000. History records no other such disastrous transition as that from the Roman Empire to the dark ages. Speaker 1: Despite this report by the Silver Commission, Congress took no action. The next year, eighteen seventy seven, riots broke out from Pittsburgh to Chicago. The torches of starving vandals lit up the sky. The bankers huddled to decide what to do. They decided to hang on. Now that they were back in control to a certain extent, they were not about to give it up. At the meeting of the American Bankers Association that year, they urged their membership to do everything in their power to put down the notion of a return to greenbacks. The ABA secretary, James Buell, authored a letter to the members which blatantly called on the banks to subvert not only congress but the press. Speaker 0: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain such prominent daily and weekly newspapers, especially the agricultural and religious press, as will oppose the greenback issue of paper money, and that you will also withhold patronage from all applicants who are not willing to oppose the government issue of money. To repeal the act creating banknotes or to restore to circulation the government issue of money will be to provide the people with money and will therefore seriously affect our individual profits as bankers and lenders. See your congressman at once and engage him to support our interests that we may control. Legislation. Speaker 1: As political pressure mounted in congress for change, the press tried to turn the American people away from the truth. The New York Tribune put it this way on 01/10/1878. The capital of the country is organized at last, and we will see whether congress will dare to fly in its face. But it didn't work entirely. On 02/28/1878, congress passed the Sherman Law, allowing the minting of a limited number of silver dollars ending the five year hiatus. This did not end gold backing of the currency, however, nor did it completely free silver. Previous to 1873, anyone who brought silver to the US Mint could have it struck into silver dollars free of charge. No longer. But at least some money began to flow back into the economy again. With no further threat to their control, the bankers loosened up on loans, and the post civil war depression was finally ended. Three years later, the American people elected republican James Garfield president. Garfield understood how the economy was being manipulated. As a congressman, he had been chairman of the appropriations committee and was a member of banking and currency. After his inauguration, he slammed the money changers publicly in 1881. Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce. And when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled one way or another by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate. Unfortunately, within a few weeks of making this statement, on July second of eighteen eighty one, president Garfield was assassinated. The money changers were gathering strength fast. They began a periodic fleecing of the flock, as they called it, by creating economic booms followed by further depressions so they could buy up thousands of homes and farms for pennies on the dollar. In 1891, the money changers prepared to take the American economy down again, and their methods and motives were laid out with shocking clarity in a memo sent out by the American Bankers Association, the ABA, an organization in which most bankers remembers. Notice that this memo called for bankers to create a depression on a certain date three years in the future. According to the congressional record, here's how it read in part. On 09/01/1894, we will not renew our loans under any consideration. On September 1, we will demand our money. We will foreclose and become mortgagees in possession. We can take two thirds of the farms West Of The Mississippi and thousands of them East Of The Mississippi as well at our price. Then the farmers will become tenants as in England. These depressions could be controlled because America was on the gold money standard. Since gold is scarce, it's one of the easiest commodities to manipulate. People wanted silver money legalized again so they could escape the stranglehold the money changers had on gold money. People wanted silver money reinstated, reversing mister Said's act of 1873 by then called the crime of '73. By 1896, the issue of more silver money had become the central issue in the presidential campaign. William Jennings Bryan, a senator from Nebraska, ran for president as a democrat on the free silver issue. At the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, he made an emotional speech which won him the nomination entitled crown of thorns and cross of gold. Though Bryan was only 36 years old at the time, this speech is widely regarded as the most famous oration ever made before a political convention. In the dramatic conclusion, Brian said Speaker 0: We will answer their demand for our gold standard by saying to them, you shall not press down upon the brow of labor of this crown of thorns. You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold. Speaker 1: The bankers lavishly supported the Republican candidate, William McKinley, who favored the gold standard. The resulting contest was amongst the most fiercely contested presidential races in American history. Bryan made over 600 speeches in 27 states. The McKinley campaign manufacturers and industrialists to inform their employees that if Bryan were elected, all factories and plants would close and there would be no work. The ruse succeeded. McKinley beat Bryan by a small margin. Bryan ran for president again in 1900 and in nineteen o eight, but fell short each time. During the nineteen twelve Democratic convention, Bryan was a powerful figure who helped Woodrow Wilson win the nomination. When Wilson became president, he appointed Brian as secretary of state, but Brian soon became disenchanted with the Wilson administration. Brian served only two years in the Wilson administration before resigning in 1915 over the highly suspicious sinking of the Lusitania, the event which was used to drive America into World War one. Although William Jennings Bryan never gained the presidency, his efforts delayed the money changers for seventeen years from attaining their next goal, a new privately owned central bank for America. Now it was time for the money changers to get back to the business of a new private Central Bank for America. During the early nineteen hundreds, men like JP Morgan led the charge. One final panic would be necessary to focus the nation's attention on the supposed need for a central bank. The rationale was that only a central bank can be prevent bank failures. Morgan was clearly the most powerful banker in America and a suspected agent for the Rothschilds. Morgan had helped finance John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil empire. He had also helped finance the monopolies of Edward Harriman in railroads, of Andrew Carnegie in steel, and of others in numerous industries. But on top of that, JP Morgan's father, Junius Morgan, had been America's Financial Agent to the British. After his father's death, JP Morgan took on a British partner, Edward Grenfell, a longtime director of the Bank of England. In fact, upon Morgan's death, his estate contained only a few million dollars. The bulk of the securities most people thought he owned were in fact owned by others. In nineteen o two, president Theodore Roosevelt allegedly went after Morgan and his friends by using the Sherman Antitrust Act to try to break up their industrial monopolies. Actually, Roosevelt did very little to interfere in the growing monopolization of American industry by the bankers and their surrogates. For example, Roosevelt supposedly broke up the standard oil monopoly, but it wasn't really broken at all. It was merely divided into seven corporations, all still controlled by the Rockefellers. The public was aware of this thanks to political cartoonists like Thomas Nast, who referred to the bankers as the money trust. By nineteen o seven, the year after Teddy Roosevelt's reelection, Morgan decided it was time to try for a central bank again. Using their combined financial muscle, Morgan and his friends were secretly able to crash the stock market. Thousands of small banks were vastly overextended. Some had reserves of less than 1%, thanks to the fractional reserve principle. Within days, bank runs were commonplace across the nation. Now Morgan stepped into the public arena and offered to prop up the faltering American economy by supporting failing banks with money he manufactured out of nothing. It was an outrageous proposal, far worse than even fractional reserve banking, but Congress let him do it. Morgan manufactured 200,000,000 dollars' worth of this completely reserve less private money and bought things with it, paid for services with it, and sent some of it to his branch banks to lend out at interest. His plan worked. Soon the public regained confidence in money in general and quit hoarding their currency. But as a result, banking power was further consolidated into the hands of a few large banks. By nineteen o eight, the panic was over, and Morgan was hailed as a hero by the president of Princeton University, a man by the name of Woodrow Wilson. Speaker 0: All this trouble could be averted if we appointed a committee of six or seven public spirited men like JP Morgan to handle the affairs of our country. Speaker 1: Economics textbooks would later explain that the creation of the Federal Reserve System was the direct result of the panic of nineteen o seven. Quote, with its alarming epidemic of bank failures, the country was fed up once and for all with the anarchy of unstable private banking, close quote. But Minnesota congressman Charles a Lindbergh senior, the father of the famous aviator Lucky Linde, later explained that the panic of nineteen o seven was really just a scam. Speaker 0: Those not favorable to the money trust could be squeezed out of business, and the people frightened into demanding changes in the banking and currency laws, which the money trust would bring. Speaker 1: So since the passage of the National Bank Act of 1863, the money changers had been able to create a series of booms and busts. The purpose was not only to fleece the American public of their property, but to later claim that the banking system was basically so unstable that it had to be consolidated into a central bank once again. After the crash, Teddy Roosevelt, in response to the panic of nineteen o seven, signed into law a bill creating something called the National Monetary Commission. The commission was to study the banking problem and make recommendations to congress. Of course, the commission was packed with Morgan's friends and cronies. The chairman was a man named senator Nelson Aldrich from Rhode Island. Aldrich represented the Newport, Rhode Island homes of America's richest banking families. His daughter married John D. Rockefeller junior, and together they had five sons. John, Nelson, who would become vice president in 1974, Lawrence, Winthrop, and David, the head of the Council on Foreign Relations and former chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank. As soon as the National Monetary Commission was set up, senator Aldrich immediately embarked on a two year tour of Europe, where he consulted at length with the private central bankers in England, France, and Germany. The total cost of his trip alone to the taxpayers was $300,000, an astronomical sum in those days. Shortly after his return on the evening of 11/22/1910, some of the wealthiest and most powerful men in America boarded senator Aldrich's private rail car and in the strictest secrecy journeyed to this place, Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia. With the group came Paul Warburg. Warburg had been given a $500,000 per year salary to lobby for the passage of a privately owned central bank in America by the investment firm Kuhn Loeb and Company. Warburg's partner in this firm was a man named Jacob Schiff, the grandson of the man who shared the Green Shield House with the Rothschild family in Frankfurt. Schiff, as we'll find out later, was in the process of spending $20,000,000 to finance the overthrow of the czar in Russia. These three European banking families, the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, and the Schiffs, were interconnected by marriage down through the years just as their American banking counterparts, the Morgans, Rockefellers, and Aldriches were. Secrecy was so tight that all seven primary participants were cautioned to use only first names to prevent servants from learning their identities. Years later, one participant, Frank Vanderlip, president of National City Bank of New York and a representative of the Rockefeller family, confirmed the Jekyll Island trip in a 02/09/1935 edition of the Saturday Evening Post. Speaker 0: I was as secretive, indeed as furtive as any conspirator discovery we knew simply must not happen or else all our time and effort would be wasted. If it were to be exposed that our particular group had got together and written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance whatever. A passage by congress. Speaker 1: The participants came here to figure out how to solve their major problem, how to bring back a privately owned central bank. But there were other problems that needed to be addressed as well. First of all, the market share of the big national banks was shrinking fast. In the first ten years of the century, the number of US banks had more than doubled to over 20,000. By 1913, only 29 of all banks were national banks, and they held only 57% of all deposits. As senator Aldrich later admitted in a magazine article Speaker 0: Before passage of this act, the New York bankers could only dominate the reserves of New York. Now we are able to dominate the bank reserves of the entire country. Speaker 1: Therefore, something had to be done to bring these new banks under their control. As John D. Rockefeller put it, quote, competition is sin, close quote. Secondly, the nation's economy was so strong that corporations were starting to finance their expansions out of profits instead of taking out huge loans from large banks. In the first ten years of the new century, 70% of corporate funding came from profits. In other words, American industry was becoming independent of the money changers, and that trend had to be stopped. All the participants knew that these problems could be hammered out into a workable solution, but perhaps their biggest problem was a public relations problem, the name of the new bank. That discussion took place right here in this room, one of the many conference rooms in this sprawling hotel, today known as the Jekyll Island Club Hotel. Aldrich believed that the word bank should not even appear in the name. Warburg wanted to call the legislation the National Reserve Bill or the Federal Reserve Bill. The idea here was to give the impression that the purpose of the new central bank was to stop bank runs, but also to conceal its monopoly character. However, it was Aldrich, the egotistical politician, who insisted it be called the Aldrich Bill. After nine days at Jekyll Island, the group dispersed. The new central bank would be very similar to the old bank of the United States. It would be given a monopoly over US currency and create that money out of nothing. How does the Fed create money out of nothing? It's a four step process. But first, a word on bonds. Bonds are simply promises to pay or government IOUs. People buy bonds to get a secure rate of interest. At the end of the term of the bond, the government repays the bond plus interest, and the bond is destroyed. There are about $3,600,000,000,000 worth of these loans or bonds at present. Now here's the Fed money making process. Step one, the Federal Open Market Committee approves the purchase of US bonds on the open market. Step two, the bonds are purchased by the Fed from whoever is offering them for sale on the open market. Step three, the Fed pays for the bonds with electronic credits to the seller's bank, which in turn credits the seller's bank account. The trick is that these credits are based on nothing. The Fed just creates them. Step four, the banks use these deposits as reserves. They can loan out over 10 times the amount of their reserves to new borrowers all at interest. In this way, a Fed purchase of, say, a million dollars worth of bonds gets turned into over $10,000,000 in bank accounts. The Fed, in effect, creates 10% of this totally new money and the banks create the other 90%. To reduce the amount of money in the economy, the process is just reversed. The Fed sells bonds to the public and the money flows out of the purchaser's local bank. Loans must be reduced by 10 times the amount of the sale. So a Fed sale of a million dollars in bonds results in $10,000,000 less money in the economy. So how does this benefit the bankers whose representatives huddled to Jekyll Island? First, it totally misdirected banking reform efforts from proper solutions. Second, it prevented a proper debt free system of government finance like Lincoln's greenbacks from making a comeback. The bond based system of government finance forced on Lincoln after he created greenbacks was now cast in stone. Third, it delegated to the bankers the right to create 90% of our money supply based on only fractional reserves, which they then loan out at interest. Fourth, it centralized overall control of our nation's money supply in the hands of a few men. Fifth, it established a central bank with a high degree of independence from effective political control. Soon after its creation, the Fed's great contraction in the early nineteen thirties would cause the Great Depression. This independence has been enhanced since then through additional laws. In order to fool the public into thinking the government retained control, the plan called for the Fed to be run by a board of governors appointed by the president and approved by the senate. But all the bankers had to do was to be sure their men got appointed to the board of governors. That wasn't hard. Bankers have money, and money buys influence over politicians. Once the participants left Jekyll Island, the public relations blitz was on. The big New York banks put together an educational fund of $5,000,000 to finance professors at respected universities to endorse the new bank. Woodrow Wilson at Princeton was one of the first to jump on the bandwagon. But the banker's subterfuge didn't work. The Aldrich bill was quickly identified as the banker's bill, a bill to benefit only what became known as the money trust. As congressman Lindbergh put it during the congressional debate Speaker 0: The Aldrich plan is the Wall Street plan. It means another panic, if necessary, to intimidate the people. Aldrich, paid by the government to represent the people, proposes a plan for the trusts instead. Speaker 1: Seeing they didn't have the votes to win in congress, the Republican leadership never brought the Aldrich bill to a vote. The bankers quietly decided to move to track two, the democratic alternative. They begin financing Woodrow Wilson as the democratic nominee. As respected historian James Perloff put it, Wall Street Financier Bernard Baruch was put in charge of Wilson's education. Speaker 0: Baruch brought Wilson to the Democratic party headquarters in New York in 1912, leading him like one would a poodle on a string. Wilson received an indoctrination course from the leaders convened there. Speaker 1: So now the stage was set. The money changers were poised to install their privately owned central bank once again. The damage president Andrew Jackson had done seventy six years earlier had been only partly repaired with the passage of the National Bank Act during the civil war. Since then, the battle had raged on across the decades. The Jacksonians became the greenbackers who became the hardcore supporters of William Jennings Bryan. With Bryan leading the charge, these opponents of the money changers, ignorant of Baruch's tutelage, now threw themselves behind democrat Woodrow Wilson. They and Bryan would soon be betrayed. During the presidential campaign, the democrats were careful to pretend to oppose the Aldrich bill. As representative Lewis McFadden, himself a himself a democrat, as well as chairman of the house banking and currency committee explained it twenty years after the fact. Speaker 0: The Aldrich bill was condemned in the platform. When Woodrow Wilson was nominated, the man who ruled the Democratic Party promised the people that if they were returned to power, there would be no central bank established here while they held the reins of government. Thirteen months later, that promise was broken. And the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of those sinister Wall Street figures who stood behind colonel House, established here in our free country the warm eaten monarchical institution of the King's Bank to control us from the top downward and to shackle us from the cradle to the grave. Speaker 1: Once Wilson was elected, Morgan, Warburg, Baruch, and company advanced a new plan, which Warburg named the Federal Reserve System. The Democratic leadership hailed the new bill called the Glass Owen bill as something radically different from the Aldrich bill. But in fact, the bill was virtually identical in every important detail. In fact, so vehement were the democratic denials of similarity that Paul Warburg, the father of both bills, had to step in to reassure his paid friends in congress that the two bills were virtually identical. Speaker 0: Brushing aside the external differences affecting the shells, we find the kernels of the two systems very closely resembling and related to one another. Speaker 1: But that admission was for private consumption only. Publicly, the money trust trotted out senator Aldrich and Frank Vanderlip, the president of Rockefeller's National City Bank of New York and one of the Jekyll Island 7 to oppose the new Federal Reserve System. Years later, however, Vanderlip admitted in the Saturday Evening Post that the two measures were virtually identical. Speaker 0: Although the Aldrich Federal Reserve Plan was defeated when it bore the name Aldrich, nevertheless, its essential points were all contained in the plan that finally was adopted. Speaker 1: As congress neared a vote, they called Ohio attorney Alfred Crozier to testify. Crozier noted the similarities between the Aldrich bill and the Glass Owen bill. Speaker 0: The bill grants just what Wall Street and the big banks for twenty five years have been striving for, private instead of public control of currency. It, the Glasowan bill, does this as completely as the Aldrich bill. Both measures rob the government and the people of all effective control over the public's money, and best in the banks exclusively the dangerous power to make money among the people scarce or plenty. Speaker 1: During the debate on the measure, senators complained that the big banks were using their financial muscle to influence the outcome. There are bankers in this country who are enemies of the public welfare, said one senator. What an understatement. Despite the charges of deceit and corruption, the bill was finally snuck through the senate on 12/22/1913 after most senators had left town for the holidays after having been assured by the leadership that nothing would be done until long after the Christmas recess. On the day the bill was passed, congressman Lindbergh prophetically warned his countrymen that Speaker 0: This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the president signs this bill, the invisible government by the monetary power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed. The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill. Speaker 1: On top of all this, only weeks earlier, congress had finally passed a bill legalizing income tax. Why was the income tax law important? Because bankers finally had in place a system which would run up a virtually unlimited federal debt. How would the interest on this debt be repaid? Never mind the principal. Remember, a privately owned central bank creates the principal out of nothing. The federal government was small then. Up to then, it had subsisted merely on tariffs and excise taxes. No. Just as with the Bank of England, the interest payments had to be guaranteed by direct taxation of the people. The money changers knew that if they had to rely on contributions from the states, eventually, the individual state legislatures would revolt and either refuse to pay the interest on their own money or at least bring pressure to bear to keep the debt small. It is interesting to note that in 1895, the Supreme Court had found a similar income tax law to be unconstitutional. The Supreme Court even found a corporate income tax law unconstitutional in nineteen o nine. As a result, senator Aldrich hustled a bill for a constitutional amendment allowing income tax through the congress. The proposed sixteenth amendment to the constitution was then sent to the state legislatures for approval, but some critics claim that the sixteenth amendment was never ratified by the necessary three quarters of the states. In other words, the sixteenth amendment may not be legal. But the money changers were in no mood to debate the fine points. By October of nineteen thirteen, senator Aldrich had hustled the income tax bill through congress. Without the power to tax the people directly and bypass the states, the Federal Reserve bill would be far less useful to those who wanted to drive America deeply into their debt. A year after the passage of the Federal Reserve bill, congressman Lindbergh explained how the Fed created what we have come to call the business cycle and how they use it to their advantage. Speaker 0: To cause high prices, all the Federal Reserve Board will do will be to lower the rediscount rate, producing an expansion of credit and a rising stock market. Then when businessmen are adjusted to these conditions, it can check prosperity in mid career by arbitrarily raising interest. It can cause the pendulum of a rising and falling market to swing gently back and forth by slight changes in the discount rate or cause violent fluctuations by a greater rate variation. Variation. And in either case, it will possess inside information as to financial conditions and advanced knowledge of the coming change, either up or down. This is the strangest, most dangerous advantage ever placed in the hands of a special privileged class by any government that ever existed. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money. They know in advance when to create panics to their advantage. They also know when to stop panic. Inflation and deflation work equally well for them when they control finance. Speaker 1: Congressman Lindbergh was correct on all points. What he didn't realize was that most European nations had already fallen prey to the central bankers decades or centuries earlier. But he also mentions the interesting fact that only one year later, the Fed had cornered the market in gold. This is how he put it, quote, already, the Federal Reserve Banks have cornered the gold and gold certificates, close certificates, close quote. But congressman Lindbergh was not the only critic of the Fed. Congressman Lewis McFadden, the chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee from 1920 to 1931, remarked that the Federal Reserve Act brought about Speaker 0: A superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. Speaker 1: Notice how McFadden saw the international character of the stockholders of the Federal Reserve. Another chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the nineteen sixties, Wright Patman from Texas, put it this way. Speaker 0: In The United States today, we have in effect two governments. We have the duly constituted government, then we have an independent, uncontrolled, and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to Congress by the constitution. Speaker 1: Even the inventor of the electric light, Thomas Edison, joined the fray in criticizing the system of the Federal Reserve. Speaker 0: If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good also. The difference between the bond and the bill is the bond lets money brokers collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20%, whereas the currency pays nobody but those who contribute directly in some useful way. It is absurd say that our country can issue $30,000,000 in bonds and not $30,000,000 in currency. Both are promises to pay, but one promise fattens the users and the other helps the people. Speaker 1: Three years after the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, even president Wilson began to have second thoughts about what had been unleashed during his first term in office. Speaker 0: We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled governments in the civilized world, no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by a vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. Some of the biggest men in The United States in the field of commerce and manufacture are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. Speaker 1: Before his death in 1924, president Wilson realized the full extent of the damage he had done to America when he confessed, I have unwittingly ruined my government. So finally, the money changers, those who profit by manipulating the amount of money in circulation, had their privately owned central bank installed again in America. The major newspapers which they also owned hailed passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 telling the public that now depressions could be scientifically prevented. The fact of the matter was that now depressions could be scientifically created. Power was now centralized to a tremendous extent. Now it was time for a war, a really big war. In fact, the first world war. Of course, to the central bankers, the political issues of war don't matter nearly as much as the profit potential, and nothing creates debts like warfare. England was the best example at that time. During the one hundred nineteen year period between the founding of the Bank of England and Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo, England had been at war for fifty six years, and much of the remaining time, she'd been preparing for war. In World War one, the German Rothschilds loaned money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loaned money to the British, and the French Rothschilds loaned money to the French. In America, JP Morgan was the sales agent for war materials to both the British and the French. In fact, six months into the war, Morgan became the largest consumer on earth spending $10,000,000 a day. His offices here at 23 Wall Street were mobbed by brokers and salesmen trying to cut a deal. In fact, it got so bad that the bank had to post guards at every door and at the partners' homes as well. Many other New York bankers made out as well from the war. President Wilson appointed Bernard Baruch to head the war industries board. According to historian James Perloff, both Baruch and the Rockefellers profited by some $200,000,000 during the war. But profits were not the only motive. There was also revenge. The money changers never forgave the czars for their support of Lincoln during the civil war. Also, Russia was the last major European nation to refuse to give in to the privately owned central bank scheme. Three years after World War one broke out, the Russian revolution toppled the czar and and installed the scourge of communism. Jacob Schiff of Kuhn Loeb and Company bragged from his deathbed that he had spent $20,000,000 towards the defeat of the czar. Money was funneled from England to support the revolution as well. Why would some of the richest men in the world financially back communism, the system that was openly vowing to destroy the so called capitalism that made them wealthy? Researcher Gary Allen explained it this way. Speaker 0: If one understands that socialism is not a share the wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool of power seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately socialism is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite. Speaker 1: As w Cleon Scousin put it in his 1970 book, the naked capitalist. Speaker 0: Power from any source tends to create an appetite for additional power. It was almost inevitable that these super rich would one day aspire to control not only their own wealth, but the wealth of the whole world. To achieve this, they were perfectly willing to feed the ambitions of the power hungry political conspirators who were committed to the overthrow of all existing governments and the establishments of a central worldwide dictatorship. Speaker 1: But what if these revolutionaries get out of control and try to seize power from the super rich? After all, it was Mao Tse Tung who in 1938 stated his position concerning power. Political power grows out the barrel of a gun. The Wall Street London axis elected to take the risk. The master planners attempted to control revolutionary communist groups by feeding them vast quantities of money when they obeyed and contracting their money supply or even financing their opposition if they got out of control. Lenin began to understand that although he was the absolute dictator of the new Soviet Union, he was not pulling the financial strings. Someone else was silently in control. Speaker 0: The state does not function as we desired. The car does not obey. A man is at the wheel and seems to lead it, but the car does not drive in the desired direction. It moves as another force wishes. Speaker 1: Who is behind it? Representative Lewis T. McFadden, the chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee throughout the nineteen twenties and into the Great Depression years of the nineteen thirties explained it this way. Speaker 0: The course of Russian history has indeed been greatly affected by the operations of international bankers. The Soviet government has been given United States treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board acting through the Chase Bank. England has drawn money from us through the Federal Reserve Banks and has relented at high rates of interest to the Soviet government. The Dniep Satori Dam was built with funds unlawfully taken from the United States Treasury by the corrupt and dishonest Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. Speaker 1: In other words, the Fed and the Bank of England at the behest of the international bankers who controlled them were creating a monster, one which would fuel seven decades of unprecedented communist revolution, warfare, and most importantly, debt. In case you think there's some chance that the money changers got communism going and then lost control, In 1992, the Washington Times reported that Russian president Boris Yeltsin was upset that most of the incoming foreign aid was being siphoned off, quote, straight back into the coffers of Western banks in debt service, close quote. No one in his right mind would claim that a war as large as World War one had a single cause. Wars are complex things with many causative factors. But on the other hand, it would also be equally foolish to ignore as a prime cause of World War one those who would profit the most from the war. The role of the money changers is no wild conspiracy theory. They had a motive, a short ranged self serving motive as well as a long range political motive of advancing totalitarian governments with the money changers maintaining the financial clout to control whatever politician might emerge as the leader. Next, we'll see what the money changers ultimate political goal is for the world. Shortly after World War one, the overall political agenda of the money changers began to be clear. Now that they controlled national economies individually, the next step was the ultimate form of consolidation, world government. The new world government proposal was given top priority at the Paris Peace Conference after World War one. It was called the League of Nations. But much to the surprise of Paul Warburg and Bernard Baruch, who attended the peace conference with president Wilson, the world was not yet ready to dissolve national boundaries. Nationalism still beats strong in the human breast. For example, Lord Curzon, the British foreign secretary, called the League of Nations a good joke even though it was the stated policy of the British government to support it. To the humiliation of president Wilson, the US Congress wouldn't ratify the league either. Despite the fact that it had been ratified by many other nations without money flowing from the US treasury, the league died. After World War I, the American public had grown tired of the internationalist policies of democrat Woodrow Wilson. In the presidential election of nineteen twenty, republican Warren Harding won a landslide victory with over 60% of the vote. Harding was an ardent foe of both Bolshevism and the League of Nations. His election, which opened a twelve year run of Republican presidents in the White House, led to an unprecedented era of prosperity known as the roaring twenties. Despite the fact that the war had brought America a debt 10 times larger than its civil war debt, still the American economy surged. Gold had poured into the country during the war, and it continued to do so afterwards. In the early nineteen twenties, the governor of this bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, a man named Benjamin Strong, met frequently with the secretive and eccentric governor of the Bank of England, Montague Norman. Norman was determined to replace the gold England had lost to The US during World War one and return the Bank of England to its former position of dominance in world finance. On top of that, rich with gold, the American economy might get out of control again just like it had done after the civil war. During the next eight years, under the presidencies of Harding and Coolidge, the huge federal debt buildup during World War one was cut by 38% down to $16,000,000,000, greatest percentage drop in US history. During the election of nineteen twenty, Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge ran against James Cox, the governor of Ohio, and the little known Franklin d Roosevelt, who had previously risen to no higher post than president Wilson's assistant secretary of the navy. After his inauguration, Harding moved quickly to formally kill the League of Nations. Then he quickly moved to reduce domestic taxes while raising tariffs to record heights. Now this was a revenue policy of which most of the founding fathers would certainly have approved. His second year in office, Harding took ill on a train trip in the West and suddenly died. Although no autopsy was performed, the cause was said to be either pneumonia or food poisoning. When Coolidge took over, he continued Harding's domestic economic policy of high tariffs on imports while cutting income taxes. As a result, the economy grew at such a rate that net revenue still increased. Now that had to be stopped. So just as they'd done so frequently before, the money changers decided it was time to crash the American economy. The Federal Reserve began flooding the country with money. They increased the money supply by 62% during these years. Money was plentiful. This is why it was known as the roaring twenties. Before his death in 1919, former president Teddy Roosevelt warned the American people what was going on. As reported in the 03/27/1922 edition of the New York Times, Roosevelt said, these international bankers and Rockefeller Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspapers and the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of public office officials who refused to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt clicks which composed the invisible government. Just one day before in the New York Times, the mayor of New York, John Hyland, quoted Roosevelt and blasted those he saw as taking control of America, its political machinery, and its press. The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timeliness today. For the real menace of our republic is this invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state, and nation. It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. To depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interest and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make cat's paws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place a nomination for high public office, only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. These international bankers and Rockefeller Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspapers and magazines in this country. Why didn't people listen to such strong warnings and demand that congress reverse its 1913 passage of the Federal Reserve Act? Because remember, it was the nineteen twenties. A steady increase in bank loans contributed to a rising market. In other words, just as it is today, in times of prosperity, no one wants to worry about economic issues. But there was a dark side to all this prosperity. Businesses expanded and became strung out on credit. Speculation in the booming stock market became rampant. Although everything looked rosy, it was a castle made of sand. When all was in readiness, in April of nineteen twenty nine, Paul Warburg, the father of the Federal Reserve, sent out a secret advisory warning his friends that a collapse and nationwide depression was certain. In August of nineteen twenty nine, the Fed began to tighten money. It is not a coincidence that the biographies of all the Wall Street giants of that era, John D. Rockefeller, JPMorgan, Bernard Baruch, etcetera, all marvel that they got out of the stock market just before the crash and put all their assets in cash or gold. On 10/24/1929, the big New York bankers called in their twenty four hour broker call loans. This meant that both stockbrokers and customers had to dump their stocks on the market to cover their loans no matter what price they had to sell them for. As a result, the market tumbled, and that day was known as Black Thursday. According to John Kenneth Galbraith riding in the great crash nineteen twenty nine, at the height of the selling frenzy, Bernard Baruch brought Winston Churchill into the visitors gallery of the New York Stock Exchange here to witness the panic and impress him with his power over the wild events down on the floor. Congressman Lewis McFadden, chairman of the house committee on banking and currency from 1920 to 1931, knew who to blame. He accused the Fed and the international bankers of orchestrating the crash. Speaker 0: It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence. The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all. Speaker 1: But McFadden went even farther. He openly accused them of causing the crash in order to steal America's gold. In February 1931, in the midst of the depression, he put it this way. Speaker 0: I think it can hardly be disputed that the statesmen and financiers of Europe are ready to take almost any means to reacquire rapidly the gold stock which Europe lost to America as the result of World War one. Speaker 1: Curtis Dahl, a broker for Lehman Brothers, was on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange the day of the crash. In his 1970 book, FDR, My Exploited Father-in-law, he explained that the crash was triggered by the planned sudden shortage of call money in the New York money market. Speaker 0: Actually, it was the calculated shearing of the public by the world money powers triggered by the planned sudden shortage of call money in the New York money market. Speaker 1: Within a few weeks, three billion dollars of wealth simply seemed to vanish. Within a year, forty billion dollars had been lost. But did it really disappear, or was it simply consolidated in fewer hands? And what did the Federal Reserve do? Instead of moving to help the economy out by quickly lowering interest rates to stimulate the economy, the Fed continued to brutally contract the money supply further, deepening the depression. Between 1929 and 1933, the Fed reduced the money supply by an additional 33%. Although most Americans have never heard that the Fed was the cause of the depression, this is well known among top economists. Milton Friedman, the Nobel Prize winning economist now of Stanford University, said the same thing in a national public radio interview in January of nineteen ninety six. The Federal Reserve definitely caused the Great Depression by contracting the amount of currency in circulation by one third from 1929 to 1933. But the money lost by most Americans during the depression didn't just vanish. It was just redistributed into the hands of those who had gotten out just before the crash and had purchased gold, which is always a safe place to put your money just before a depression. But America's money also went overseas. Incredibly, as president Hoover was heroically trying to rescue banks and prop up businesses with millions of Americans starving as the Great Depression deepened, millions of dollars were being spent rebuilding Germany from damage sustained during World War one. Eight years before Hitler would invade Poland, Representative Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, warned congress that Americans were paying for Hitler's rise to power. After World War one, Germany fell into the hands of the German international bankers. Those bankers bought her, and they now own her lock, stock, and barrel. They have purchased her industries. They have mortgages on her soil. They control her production. They control all her public utilities. The international German bankers have subsidized the present government of Germany, and they have also supplied every dollar of the money Adolf Hitler has used in his lavish campaign to build up a threat to the government of Bruning. When Bruning fails to obey the orders of the German international bankers, Hitler is brought forth to scare the Germans into submission. Through the Federal Reserve Board, over 30 billions of dollars of American money has been pumped into Germany. You have all heard of the spending that's taken place in Germany, modernistic dwellings, her great planetariums, her gymnasiums, her swimming pools, her fine public highways, her perfect factories. All this was done on our money. All this was given to Germany through the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board has pumped so many billions of dollars into Germany that they dare not name the total. Franklin d Roosevelt was swept into office during the nineteen thirty two presidential election. Once Roosevelt was in office, however, sweeping emergency banking measures were immediately announced, which did nothing but increase the Fed's power over the money supply. Then and only then did the Fed finally begin to loosen the purse strings and feed new money out to the starving American people. At first, Roosevelt railed against the money changers as being the cause of the depression. Believe it or not, this is what he said on 03/04/1933 in his inaugural address. Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men. The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. But two days later, Roosevelt declared a bank holiday and closed all banks. Later that year, Roosevelt outlawed private ownership of all gold bullion ownership of all gold bullion and all gold coins with the exception of rare coins. Most of the gold in the hands of the average American was in the form of gold coins. The new decree was in effect a confiscation. Those who didn't comply risk as much as ten years in prison and a $10,000 fine, the equivalent of a hundred thousand dollars today. Out in small town America, some people didn't trust Roosevelt's order. Many were torn between keeping their hard earned wealth or obeying the government. Those who did turn in their gold were paid the official price for it, $20.66 per ounce. So unpopular was the confiscation order that no one anywhere in government would take credit for authoring it. No congressman claimed it. At the signing ceremony, president Roosevelt made it clear to all present that he was not the author of it and publicly stated that he had not ever read it. Even his secretary of the treasury said he'd never read it either, saying it was, quote, what the experts wanted. Roosevelt convinced the public to give up their gold by saying that pooling the nation's resources was necessary to get America out of the depression. With great fanfare, he ordered a new bullion depository built to hold the mountain of gold the US government was illegally confiscating. By 1936, the US bullion depository at Fort Knox was completed. And in January 1937, the gold began to flow into it. The rip off of the ages was about to proceed. In 1935, once the gold had all been turned in, the official price of gold was suddenly raised to $35 per ounce. But the catch was only foreigners could sell their gold at the new higher price. The money changers who had heated Warburg's note and gotten out of the stock market just before the crash and bought gold at $20.66 per ounce then shipped it to London could now bring it back and sell it back to the government nearly doubling their money while the average American starved. The Fort Knox bullion depository sits here in the middle of the Fort Knox Military Reservation, Thirty miles southwest of Louisville, Kentucky. This was as close as we were permitted to get to the depository despite years of letters from members of congress to allow our film crew inside. The four acre grounds immediately surrounding the building are guarded by an electrified steel fence, an open moat, and four machine gun armed guard pillbox at the structure's corners. When the gold began arriving on 01/13/1937, there was unprecedented security. Thousands of official guests watched the arrival of a nine car train from Philadelphia guarded by armed soldiers, postal inspectors, secret servicemen, and guards from the US Mint. It was all great theater. America's gold supply from across the land had been pooled supposedly for the public benefit and then safely tucked into Fort Knox. But all that security would soon be breached by the government itself. Now the stage was set for a really big war, one which would pile up debt far beyond that of World War one. Speaker 0: For example, in 1944 alone, The US national income was only $183,000,000,000, yet 103,000,000,000 was spent on the war. This was 30 times the spending rate during World War one. In fact, the American taxpayer picked up 55% of the total Allied cost of the war. But equally important, virtually every nation involved in World War two greatly multiplied their debt. In The US, for example, federal debt went from 43,000,000,000 in 1940 up to 257,000,000,000 in 1950, an increase of 598%. Between 1940 and 1950, Japanese debt swelled 1348%. French debt grew 583%, and Canadian debt soared 417%. Speaker 1: After the war, the world was now divided into two economic camps, communist command economies on the one hand versus monopoly capitalists on the other, set to fight it out in one perpetual and highly profitable arms race. It was finally time for the central bankers to embark in earnest on their three step plan to centralize the economic systems of the entire world and finally bring about their global government or new world order. The phases of this plan were step one, central bank domination of national economies worldwide. Step two, centralize regional economies through organizations such as the European Monetary Union and regional trade unions such as NAFTA. Step three, centralize the world economy through a World Central Bank, a world money, and ending national independence through abolition of all tariffs by treaties like GATT. Step one was completed long ago. Steps two and three are far advanced, nearing completion. What about gold? Among central banks, the largest holder of gold is now the IMF. It and central banks now control two thirds of the world's gold supply, giving them the ability to manipulate the gold market. Remember the money changers golden rule, he who has the gold makes the rules. But before we get into solutions to our problem, let's take a look at what happened to all that gold in Fort Knox. Because if we don't understand that the gold has been stolen, we'll allow ourselves to be stampeded into the wrong solution, a gold backed currency. Most Americans still believe that the gold is still here at Fort Knox. At the end of World War two, Fort Knox contained over 700,000,000 ounces of gold, an incredible 70% of all the gold in the world. How much remains? No one knows. Despite the fact that federal law requires an annual physical audit of Fort Knox gold, the treasury has consistently refused to conduct one. The truth is that a reliable audit of whatever remains here has not been conducted since president Eisenhower ordered one in 1953. Where did America's gold in Fort Knox go? Over the years, it was sold off to European money changers at the $35 per ounce price. Remember, this was during a time when it was illegal for Americans to buy any of their own gold from Fort Knox. In fact, there was a very infamous case where the Firestone family set up a string of dummy corporations to purchase Fort Knox gold and keep it in Switzerland, never hitting US shores. They were eventually caught however and successfully prosecuted. Finally, by 1971, all the pure gold had been secretly removed from Fort Knox, drained back to London. Once the gold was gone from Fort Knox, President Nixon closed the gold window by repealing Roosevelt's Gold Reserve Act of 1934, finally making it legal once again for Americans to buy gold. Naturally, gold prices immediately began to soar. Nine years later, gold sold for $880 per ounce, 25 times what the gold in Fort Knox was sold for. One would think that eventually someone in the government would get wind of what was happening and blow the whistle. The largest fortune in the history of the world, stolen. Shades of the old James Bond film Goldfinger. Well, as a matter of fact, Ian Fleming, the author of the James Bond series, was head of the British counter intelligence service MI five. Some believe in the intelligence community that he wrote much of his fiction as a warning as many authors of fiction do. If the removal of all the good delivery gold from Fort Knox can be viewed as a deliberate raid on the US treasury, then such an operation might well have been years in the making, namely forty years. Certainly enough time for Fleming to get wind of it and try to prevent it. So just how did the story of the Fort Knox gold robbery get out? It all started with an article in a New York periodical in 1974. The article charged that the Rockefeller family was manipulating the Federal Reserve to sell off Fort Knox gold at bargain basement prices to anonymous European speculators. Three days later the anonymous source of the story Louise Auchincloss Boyer mysteriously fell to her death from the window of her Tenth Floor apartment in New York. How had missus Boyer have known of the Rockefeller connection to the Fort Knox Gold Heist? She was the longtime secretary of Nelson Rockefeller. For the next fourteen years, this man, Ed Durell, a wealthy Ohio industrialist, devoted himself to a quest for the truth concerning the Fort Knox gold. He wrote thousands of letters to over 1,000 government and banking officials trying to find out how much gold was really left and where the rest of it had gone. Edith Roosevelt, the granddaughter of president Teddy Roosevelt, questioned the actions of the government in a March 1975 edition of the New Hampshire Sunday News. Allegations of missing gold from our Fort Knox vaults are being widely discussed in European financial circles. But what is puzzling is that the administration is not hastening to demonstrate conclusively that there is no cause for concern over our gold treasure, if indeed it is in a position to do so. Unfortunately, Ed Durell never did accomplish his primary goal, a full audit of the gold reserves in Fort Knox. It's incredible that the world's greatest treasure has had little accounting or auditing. This goal belonged to the American people, not the Federal Reserve and their foreign owners. One thing is certain, the government could blow all of this speculation away in a few days with a well publicized audit under the searing lights of media cameras. It has chosen not to do so. One must conclude that they are afraid of the truth such an audit would reveal. What is the government so afraid of? Here's the answer. When president Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, his conservative friends urged him to study the feasibility of returning to a gold standard as the only way to curb government spending. It sounded like a reasonable alternative, so president Reagan appointed a group of men called the Gold Commission to study the situation and report back to Congress. What Reagan's Gold Commission reported back to Congress in 1982 was the following shocking revelation concerning gold. The US Treasury owned no gold at all. All the gold that was left in Fort Knox was now owned by the Federal Reserve, a group of private bankers as collateral against the national debt. The truth of the matter is that never before has so much money been stolen from the hands of the general public and put into the hands of a small group of private investors, the money changers. I'm standing in front of the headquarters of the International Monetary Fund located in Washington DC. Across the street right over there is the headquarters of the World Bank. What are these organizations, and who controls them, and most importantly, are they about to create a huge worldwide depression? Let us step back in time for a moment to the aftermath of World War one. People were tired of war. So under the guise of peacemaking, the international bankers devised a plan to consolidate power even further. Claiming only an international government would stem the tide of world wars, the money changers pushed forward a proposal for world government which stood on three legs. A world central bank to be called the Bank of International Settlements, a world judiciary to be called the world court located in The Hague, The Netherlands, and a world executive and legislature to be called the League of Nations. As president Clinton's mentor, Georgetown Historian Carol Quigley, wrote in his 1966 book, Tragedy and Hope, the powers of financial capitalism had a far reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at infrequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the bank for international settlements in Beale, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world. Despite intense pressure from the international bankers and the press, a handful of US Senators led by senator Henry Cabot Lodge kept The US out of these schemes. Without US participation, the league was doomed. Incredibly, even though The US rejected the World Central Bank, the BIS, the New York Federal Reserve ignored its government and arrogantly sent representatives to Switzerland to participate in the central bankers meeting right up until 1994 when The US was finally officially dragged into it. Their world government schemes thwarted, the bankers resorted to the old formula, another war to wear down the resistance to world government while reaping handsome profits. To this end, Wall Street helped resurrect Germany through the thyssen banks which were affiliated with the Harriman interest in New York just as the Chase Bank had assisted in the financing of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia during World War one. Chase Bank was controlled by the Rockefeller family. Subsequently, it was merged with Warburg's Manhattan Bank to form the Chase Manhattan Bank. Now this has merged with Chemical Bank of New York making it the largest Wall Street bank. Their strategy worked. Even before World War two was over, world government was back on track. In 1944 at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were approved with full US participation. The second League of Nations, renamed the United Nations, was approved in 1945. Soon, a new international court system was functioning as well. All effective opposition to these international bodies before the war had evaporated in the heat of war just as planned. These new organizations simply repeated on a world scale what the National Banking Act of 1864 and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 had established in The US. They created a banking cartel composed of the world's central banks, which gradually assumed the power to dictate credit policies to the banks of all the nations. For example, just as the Federal Reserve Act authorized the creation of a new national fiat currency called Federal Reserve Notes, the IMF has been given the authority to issue a world fiat money called special drawing rights or SDRs. To date, the IMF has created an excess of $30,000,000,000 worth of SDRs. Member nations are being pressured to make their currencies fully exchangeable for SDRs. In 1968, congress approved laws authorizing the Fed to accept SDRs as reserves in The US and to issue Federal Reserve notes in exchange for SDRs. What does that mean? It means that in The US, SDRs are already a part of our lawful money. And what about gold? SDRs are already partially backed by gold and with two thirds of world gold now in the hands of central banks, the money changers can go about structuring the world's economic future in whichever way they deem most profitable. Keep in mind, just as the Fed is controlled by its board of governors, the IMF is controlled by its board of governors, which are either the heads of the different central banks or the heads of the various national treasury departments dominated by their central banks. Voting power in the IMF gives The US and The UK, that is to say the Fed and the Bank of England, effective control. Just as the Fed controls the amount of money in The US, the BIS, IMF, and World Bank control the money supply for the world. So we see repetition of the old goldsmith's fraud replicated on the national scale with central banks like the Fed and on the international scale by the three arms of the World Central Bank. Is this organization of the BIS, the IMF, and the World Bank, which we refer to collectively as the World Central Bank presently expanding and contracting world credit? Yes. Regulations put into effect in 1988 by the BIS required the world's bankers to raise their capital and reserves to 8% of liabilities by 1992. Increased capital requirements put an upper to the fractional reserve lending similar to the way cash reserve requirements do. What is this seemingly insignificant regulation made in a Swiss city eight years ago meant to the world? It means our banks cannot loan more and more money to buy more and more time before the next depression as a maximum loan ratio is now set. It means those nations with the lowest bank reserves in their systems have already felt the terrible effects of this credit contraction as their banks scrambled to raise money to increase their reserves to 8%. To raise the money, they had to sell stocks, which depressed their stock markets and began the depression first in their countries. Japan, which in 1988 had among the lowest capital and reserve requirements and thus was the most affected by the regulation has experienced the financial crash which began almost immediately in 1989 which has wiped out a staggering 50% of the value of its stock market since 1990 and sixty percent of the value of its commercial real estate. The Bank of Japan has lowered its interest rates to one half of 1%, practically giving away money to resurrect the economy, but still the depression worsens. Due to the $20,000,000,000 US bailout of Mexico, the financial collapse in that nation is already known here. Yet despite the bailout, the economy continues to be a disaster. One huge debt after another is rolled over as new loans are being made simply to enable Mexico to pay the interest on the old loans. In the South Of Mexico, the poor have been in open revolt as every spare peso has been siphoned out of the country to make interest payments. It is important to note that a radical transfer of power is taking place as nations become subservient to a supranational World Central Bank controlled by a handful of the world's richest bankers. As the IMF creates more and more SDRs by the stroke of a pin on IMF ledgers, more and more nations borrow them to pay interest on their mounting debts and gradually fall under the control of the faceless bureaucrats of the World Central Bank. As the worldwide depression worsens and spreads, this will give the world central bank the power of economic life and death over these nations. It will decide which nations will be permitted to receive further loans and which nations will starve. Despite all the rhetoric about development and the alleviation of poverty, the result is a steady transfer of wealth from the debtor nations to the money changers central banks which control the IMF and the World Bank. For example, in 1992, the third world debtor nations, borrowed from the World Bank, paid $198,000,000 more to the central banks of the developed nations for World Bank funded purposes than they received from the World Bank. All this increases their permanent debt in exchange for temporary relief of poverty caused by prior borrowings. Already, these repayments exceed the amount of the new loans. By 1992, Africa's external debt had reached $290,000,000,000, 2 and a half times greater than in 1980, resulting in skyrocketing infant mortality rates and unemployment, deterioration of schools, housing, and the general health of the people. The entire world faces the immeasurable suffering already destroying the third world and now Japan, all for the benefit of the money changers. As one prominent Brazilian politician put it, the Third World War has already started. It is a silent war, not for that reason any less sinister. The war is tearing down Brazil, Latin America, and practically all the third world. Instead of soldiers dying, there are children. It is a war over the third world debt, one which has as its main weapon interest, a weapon more deadly than the atom bomb, more shattering than a laser beam. Although it would be absurd to ignore the pivotal role played by influential families such as the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Schiffs, the Morgans, and the Rockefellers in any review of the history of central banking and fractional banking. Keep in mind, by now central banks and the large commercial banks are up to three centuries old and deeply entrenched in the economic life of many nations. These banks are no longer dependent on clever individuals such as a Nathan Rothschild. Years ago, the question of ownership was important but no longer. For example, both the Bank of England and the Bank of France were nationalized after World War two and nothing changed, nothing at all. They endure and continue to grow now protected by numerous laws, paid politicians, and mortgage media untouched by the changing of generations. Now worn by the sixth generation's son who's been raised in a system that he may never question question as he is named to serve on the governing boards of countless philanthropic organizations. To focus attention today on individuals or families or to attempt to sort out the current holders of power serves little useful purpose and would be a distraction from the cure. The problem is far bigger than that. It is the corrupt banking system that was and is being used to consolidate vast wealth into fewer and fewer hands that is our current economic problem. Change the names of the main players now, and the problem will neither go away nor even miss a beat. Likewise, among the hordes of bureaucrats working in the World Bank, central banks, and international banks, only a tiny fraction have any idea of what's really going on. No doubt they'd be horrified to learn that their work is contributing to the terrible impoverishment and gradual enslavement of mankind to a few incredibly rich plutocrats. Plutocrats. So really, there's no use in emphasizing the role of individuals anymore. And the problem even transcends the normal spectrum of political right and left. Both communism and socialism as well as monopoly capitalism have been used by the money changers. Today, they profit from either side of the new political spectrum. The big government welfare state on the so called left wing versus the neoconservative laissez faire capitalists who want big government totally out of their lives on the right wing. Either way, the bankers win. Monetary reform is the most important political issue facing this nation. That clarified. Let's proceed to the conclusions in the spirit Lincoln declared with malice towards none, with charity towards all. At the start of this video, we ask a number of troubling questions. Let's be sure we've answered them. Speaker 0: What's going on in America today? Why are we over our heads in debt? Why can't the politicians bring debt under control? Speaker 1: Why are we over our heads in debt? Because we're laboring under a debt money system that is designed and controlled by private bankers. Now some will argue that the Federal Reserve System is a quasi governmental agency, But the president appoints only two of the seven members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors every four years, and he appoints them to fourteen year terms far longer than his own. The senate does confirm those appointments, but the whole truth is that the president wouldn't dare appoint anyone to that board of whom Wall Street does not approve. Of course, this does not preclude the possibility that some honorable men may be appointed to the board of governors, But the fact is that the Fed is specifically designed to operate independently of our government as are nearly all other central banks. Some argue that the Fed promotes monetary stability. We saw the current head of the Bank of England, Eddie George, claim that this was the most important role of a central bank. In fact, the Fed's record of stabilizing the economy shows it to be a miserable failure in this regard. Within the first twenty five years of its existence, the Fed caused three major economic downturns including the Great Depression, and for the last thirty years has shepherded the American economy into a period of unprecedented inflation. Again, this is not some wild conspiracy theory. It's a well known fact among top economists. As Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman put it, the stock of money, prices, and output was decidedly more unstable after the establishment of the Federal Reserve System than before. The most dramatic period of instability in output was, of course, the period between the two wars, which includes the severe monetary contractions of nineteen twenty twenty one, '19 '20 '9 '30 '3, and nineteen thirty seven thirty eight. No other twenty year period in American history contains as many as three such severe contractions. This evidence persuades me that at least a third of the price rise during and just after World War one is attributable to the establishment of the Federal Reserve System. And that the severity of each of the major contractions, nineteen twenty twenty one, '19 '20 '9 '30 '3, and nineteen thirty seven thirty eight is directly attributable to acts of commission and omission by the reserve authorities. Any system which gives so much power and so much discretion to a few men so that mistakes, excusable or not, can have such far reaching effects is a bad system. It is a bad system to believers in freedom just because it gives a few men such power without any effective check by the body politic. This is the key political argument against an independent central bank. To paraphrase Clemenceau, money is much too serious a matter to be left to the central bankers. We must learn from our history before it is too late. Why can't politicians control the federal debt? Because all our money is created out of debt. Again, it's a debt money system. Our money is created initially by the purchase of US bonds. The public buys bonds like savings bonds. The banks buy bonds. Foreigners buy bonds. And when the Fed wants to create more money in the system, it buys bonds but pays for them with a simple bookkeeping entry, which it creates out of nothing. Then this new money created by the Fed is multiplied by a factor of 10 by the banks, thanks to the fractional reserve principle. So although the banks don't create currency, they do create checkbook money or deposits by making new loans. They even invest some of this created money. In fact, over $1,000,000,000,000 of this privately created money has been used to purchase US bonds on the open market, which provides the banks with roughly $50,000,000,000 in interest, risk free each year less the interest they pay to some depositors. In this way, through fractional reserve lending, banks create over 90% of the money and therefore cause over 90% of our inflation. What can we do about all this? Fortunately, there's a way to fix the problem fairly easily, speedily, and without any serious financial problems. We can get our country totally out of debt in one to two years by simply paying off these US bonds with debt free US notes just like Lincoln issued. Of course, that by itself would create tremendous inflation since our currency is presently multiplied by the fraction fractional reserve banking system. But here's the ingenious solution advanced in part by Milton Friedman to keep the money supply stable and avoid inflation and deflation while the debt is retired. As the treasury buys up its bonds on the open market with US notes, the reserve requirements of your hometown local bank will be proportionally raised so the amount of money in circulation remains constant. As those holding bonds are paid off in US notes, they will deposit this money thus making available the currency then needed by the banks to increase their reserves. Once all The US bonds are replaced with US notes, banks will be at 100% reserve banking instead of the fractional reserve system currently in use. From this point on, the former Fed buildings will only be needed as a central clearinghouse for checks and as vaults for US notes. The Federal Reserve Act will no longer be necessary and could be repealed. Monetary power can be transferred back to the Treasury department. There would be no further creation or contraction of money by banks. By doing it this way, our national debt can be paid off in a single year or so, and the Fed and fractional reserve banking abolished without national bankruptcy, financial collapse, inflation or deflation, or any significant change in the way the average American goes about his business. To the average person, the primary difference would be that for the first time since the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913, taxes would begin to go down. Now there's a real national blessing for you rather than for Hamilton's banker friends. Now let's take a look at these proposals in more detail. Here are the main provisions of a Monetary Reform Act which needs to be passed by Congress. We've drafted a proposed Monetary Reform Act which follows at the end of this tape. Of course, variations with the same results would be equally welcome. One, pay off the debt with debt free US notes. As Thomas Edison put it, if The US can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. They both rest purely on the faith and credit of the United States government. This amounts to a simple substitution of one type of government obligation for another. One bears interest, the other doesn't. Federal Reserve notes could be used for this as well, but could not be printed after the Fed's abolished as we propose, so we suggest using US notes instead. Two, abolish fractional reserve banking. As the debt is paid off, the reserve requirements of all banks and financial institutions would be raised proportionally at the same time to absorb the new US notes, which would be deposited and become the bank's increased reserves. Towards the end of the first year of the transition period, the remaining liabilities of financial institutions would be assumed or acquired by the US government in a one time operation. In other words, they too would eventually be paid off with debt free US notes in order to keep the total money supply stable. At the end of the first year or so, all of the national debt would be paid, and we could start enjoying the benefits of full reserve banking. The Fed would be obsolete and anachronism. Three, repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the National Banking Act of 1864. These acts delegate the money power to a private banking monopoly. They must be repealed and the money power handed back to the Department of Treasury where they were initially under president Abraham Lincoln. No banker or person in any way affiliated with financial institutions should be allowed to regulate banking. After the first two reforms, these acts would serve no useful purpose anyway since they relate to a fractional reserve banking system. Four, withdraw The US from the IMF, the BIS, and the World Bank. These institutions like the Federal Reserve are designed to further centralize the power of the international bankers over the world's economy, and The US must withdraw from them. Their harmless functions such as currency exchange can be accomplished either nationally or in new organizations limited to those Such a monetary reform act would guarantee that the amount of money in circulation would stay very stable, causing neither inflation nor deflation. Remember, for the last three decades, the Fed has doubled the American money supply every ten years. That fact and fractional reserve banking are the real causes of inflation and the reduction in our buying power, a hidden tax. These and other taxes are the real reasons both parents now have to work just to get by. The money supply should increase slowly to keep prices stable, roughly in proportion to population growth about 3% per year, not at the whim of a group of bankers meeting in secret. In fact, all future decisions on how much money will be in the American economy must be made based on statistics of population growth and the price level index. The new monetary regulators and the Treasury Department, perhaps called the monetary committee, would have absolutely no discretion in this matter except in time of declared war. This would ensure a steady stable money growth of roughly 3% per year resulting in stable prices and no sharp changes in the money supply. To make certain the process is completely open and honest, all deliberations would be public, not secret, as meetings of the Fed's Board of Governors are today. How do we know this will work? Because these steps remove the two major causes of economic instability, the Fed and fractional reserve banking, and the newest one as well, the BIS, Bank of International Settlements. But most importantly, the danger of a severe depression would be eliminated. Let's listen to Milton Friedman on the single cause of severe economic depressions. I know of no severe depression in any country or any time that was not accompanied by a sharp decline in the stock of money, and equally of no sharp decline in the stock of money that was not accompanied by a severe depression. Issuing our own currency is not a radical solution. It's been advocated by presidents Jefferson, Madison, Jackson, Van Buren, and Lincoln, but it's been used at different times throughout Europe as well. Perhaps the best example is one of the small islands off the coast of France in the English Channel. Called Guernsey, it's been using debt free money issues to pay for large building projects for nearly two hundred years. Here we are in Guernsey, and this is the Guernsey Flower and Vegetable Market. Market. Guernsey is one of the most successful examples of just how well a debt free money system can work. In 1815, a committee was appointed to investigate how best to finance this new market. The impoverished island could not afford more new taxes, so the state's fathers decided to try a revolutionary idea, issue their own paper money. They were just colorful paper notes backed by nothing, but the people of this tiny island agreed to accept them and trade with them. To be sure they circulated widely, they were declared to be good for the payment of taxes. Of course, this idea was nothing new. It was exactly what America had done before the American Revolution, and there are many other examples throughout the world. But it was new to Guernsey, and it worked miracles. This market is still in use. And remember, it was built for no debt to the people of this island state. But what if we follow Guernsey's example? How would the bankers react to these reforms? Certainly, the international bankers cartel will oppose reforms that do away with their control of the world's economies as they have in the past. But it is equally certain that Congress has the constitutional authority and responsibility to authorize the issuance of debt free money, US notes, and to reform the very banking laws it ill advisedly enacted. Undoubtedly, the bankers will claim that issuing debt free money will cause severe inflation or make other dire predictions. But remember, it is fractional reserve banking which is the real cause of over 90% of all inflation, not whether debt free US notes are used to pay for government deficits. In the current system, any spending excesses on the part of congress are turned into more debt bonds, and the 10% purchased by the Fed are then multiplied many times over by the bankers causing over 90% of all inflation. Our fractional reserve and debt based banking system is the problem. We must ignore its inevitable resistance to reform and remain firm until the cure is complete. As the director of the Bank of England in the nineteen twenties, sir Josiah Stamp put it, referring to this modern fractional reserve banking system. Banking is conceived in an equity and born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money and control credit. And with the flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from the bankers, and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear. For this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and to control credit. Americans are slowly figuring this out. Today, over 3,200 cities and counties have endorsed the proposal of a nonprofit organization called sovereignty. The sovereignty movement calls for Congress to authorize the secretary of the treasury to issue $90,000,000,000 per year of US notes, not Federal Reserve notes nor debt based bonds, to loan money interest free to cities, counties, and school districts for needed capital improvements. Remarkably, and to their praise, the Community Bankers Association of Illinois representing 515 member banks has endorsed this sovereignty proposal, a good step in the right direction. As Milton Friedman has repeatedly pointed out, no severe depression can occur without a severe contraction of money. In our system, only the Fed, the Bank of International Settlements with US Bankers cooperation, or a combination of the largest Wall Street banks could cause a depression. In other words, our economy is so huge and resilient, a depression just can't happen by accident. Unless we reform our banking system, they will always have that power. They can pull the plug in our economy anytime they choose. The only solution is to abolish the Fed and the fractional reserve banking system and withdraw from the BIS. Only that will break the power of the international bankers over our economy. And keep in mind, a stock market crash itself cannot cause a severe depression. Only the severe contraction of our money supply can cause a severe depression. The stock market crash of nineteen twenty nine only wiped out market speculators, mostly the small to medium ones, resulting in $3,000,000,000 in wealth changing hands. But it served as a smokescreen for a 33% contraction in credit by the Fed over the next four years, which resulted in over $40,000,000,000 in wealth from the American middle class being transferred to the big banks. Then despite impotent howls of protest from a divided congress, the independent Fed kept the money supply contracted for a full decade. Only World War two ended the terrible suffering Fed people. In a depression, the remaining wealth of the debt burden American middle class will be wiped out by unemployment, declining wages, and the resulting foreclosures. If we start to act to reform our monetary system, the money changers may do what they did in 1929 and then the nineteen thirties, crash the stock market and use that as a smokescreen while contracting the money supply. But if we're determined to fight to regain control over our money, we can come out of it fairly quickly, perhaps in only a very few months as US notes begin to circulate and replace the money withdrawn by the bankers. The longer we wait, the greater the danger will permanently lose control of our nation. But some still wonder why the international bankers would want to cause a depression. Wouldn't that be killing the goose that is currently laying all those golden interest eggs? Remember what Larry Bates said at the first of this videotape. Speaker 3: You see, in periods of economic upheaval, in economic crisis, wealth is not destroyed. It is merely transferred. Speaker 1: Do we have any hints as to what the money changers have in store for us? Here's what David Rockefeller, the chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, the largest Wall Street bank, had to say. We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nation will accept the new world order. So crisis is needed to fulfill their plans quickly. The only question is when the crisis will occur. Fortunately, we probably have a little time. It's unlikely that this crisis will occur before the nineteen ninety six elections, but after that, the danger begins rising. But whether or not they decide to cause a crash or a depression through relentless increases in taxes and the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs being sent overseas, thanks to trade agreements such as GAT and NAFTA, the American middle class is an endangered species. Cheaper labor, including slave labor in Red China, which Harry Wu has heroically documented, is being used to compete with American labor. In other words, money is being consolidated in fewer and fewer hands as never before in the history of this nation or the world. Without reform, the American middle class will soon be extinct, leaving only the very rich few and the very many poor as has already occurred in most of the world. We've been warned of all this by congressmen, presidents, industrialists, and economists down through the years. Religious leaders too have seen the danger. About 1898, during the time of William Jennings Bryan, Pope Leo the thirteenth put it this way. On the one side, there is the party which holds the power because it holds the wealth, which has in its grasp all labor and all trade, which manipulates for its own benefit and its own purposes all the sources of supply and which is powerfully represented in the councils of state itself. On the other side, there is the needy and powerless multitude sore and suffering. Rapacious usury which although more than once condemned by the church is nevertheless under a different form but with the same guilt still practiced by avaricious and grasping men that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the masses of the poor a yoke little better than slavery itself. More recently, during America's Great Depression Pope Pius the eleventh spoke of the same problem. In our days, not alone is wealth accumulated, but immense power and despotic economic domination is concentrated in the hands of a few. This power becomes particularly irresistible when exercised by those who, because they hold and control money, are able also to govern credit and determine its allotment. For this reason, supplying, so to speak, the lifeblood to the entire economic body and grasping as it were in their hands the very soul of the economy so that no one dare breathe against their will. Educate your friends. Our country needs a solid group who really understand how our money is manipulated and what the solutions really are. Because if a depression comes, there will be those who call themselves conservatives who will come forward advancing solutions framed by the international bankers. Beware of calls to return to a gold standard. Why? Simple. Because never before has so much gold been so concentrated outside of American hands, and never before has so much gold been in the hands of international governmental bodies such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. A gold backed currency usually brings despair to a nation and to return to it would certainly be a false solution in our case. Remember, we had a gold backed currency in 1929 and during the first four years of the Great Depression. Likewise, beware of any plans advanced for a regional or world currency. This is the international bankers Trojan horse. Educate your member of congress. It only takes a few persuasive members to make the others pay attention. Most congressmen just don't understand the system. Some understand it, but are so influenced by bank pack contributions that they ignore it, not realizing the gravity of their neglect. We hope we've made a valuable contribution to the national debate on monetary reform. It remains for each man to do his duty consistent with his state in life. May God give us the light to help reform our nation and ourselves. We say ourselves because ultimately vast multitudes of men are going to be driven more and more to desperation by the accumulation of the world's wealth in fewer and fewer hands. Men will tend to become like their oppressors, selfish and greedy. Rather, let's keep in mind during this period of reform a warning not to lose sight of greater things. As Pope Pius the eleventh put it, for what will it profit men that a more prudent distribution and use of riches make it possible for them to gain even the whole world, if thereby they suffer the loss of their own souls? What will it profit to teach them sound principles and economics if they permit themselves to be so swept away by selfishness by unbridled and sordid greed that hearing the commandments of the Lord, they do all things contrary.

@IandE4Life - Steve Gibbs | Family Wealth Expert

🏦 HOW THE FEDERAL RESERVE SECRETLY ENSLAVED THE WORLD - FULL DOCUMENTARY https://t.co/2Bg1TWeSDM

Video Transcript AI Summary
On 11/07/2024, the Federal Reserve chairman asserted independence from presidential control, sparking questions about the Fed's power. To understand its influence, we must go back to Jekyll Island in 1910. Amidst a collapsing banking system, key figures secretly convened to create a central bank, later known as the Federal Reserve. The goal was to stabilize the financial system. The Aldrich plan, though initially rejected for being too pro-banker, was modified and signed into law. After World War II, the US dollar became the global reserve currency and the Fed gained immense power. Through monetary policy and covert operations, the Fed has shaped global finance. Critics argue that the Fed's policies have led to wealth inequality, boom and bust cycles, and a debt trap for many.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On 11/07/2024, the chairman of the Federal Reserve openly defied the president of The United States Of America, declaring essentially that even the leader of the free world could not supersede supersede him. Speaker 1: Do you believe that the president has the power to fire or demote you and has the Fed determined the legality of a president demoting at will any of the other governors with leadership positions? Speaker 2: Not permitted under the law. Speaker 1: Not what? Speaker 2: Not permitted under the law. Speaker 0: What kind of power can defy the leader of the free world? How are we all convinced to grant nearly unlimited power to this money printing agency? So what is the Federal Reserve, and how has it driven us towards a hundred years of inequality, wars, and a $36,000,000,000,000 debt bubble that's ready to burst at any moment. To understand this, we're gonna need to go a hundred and ten years back to a secret meeting that was held on a private island off the coast of Georgia. This is the story of Jekyll Island. Speaker 3: Can I ask you a question? Yes. What do you know about the Federal Reserve? Speaker 4: That's too much info. Let's ride that. Speaker 5: We're literally going to where they created the Federal Reserve. Speaker 6: Good to meet you. Speaker 3: Nice to meet you, man. Speaker 5: Good job. Speaker 6: Glad you guys made it. Speaker 7: The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. We Speaker 0: were hoping to help take down the global financial hegemony. Speaker 8: This is weird, man. This is strange. It feels like, you know, it feels like an old folks retirement sanctuary, but it also feels like a little bit of an eerie feeling. Speaker 0: It feels out of time. Right? It's like, it's not new, it's not old. Speaker 3: Picture this. You're an ordinary American citizen in the year nineteen o seven. In your city or a city near you, there are constant constant bank runs. Because the American financial system was very distributed, much in the same way that the internet is sort of distributed. Almost like a bunch of web pages. They used to be just a bunch of banks loaning to each other, taking on each other's risks, not having one central issuer of currency. If you went from California to Florida or California to New York back in the eighteen hundreds and the nineteen hundreds, they would have a separate different currency. At one point, there were 30,000 currencies across all The United States. That's like almost more than the amount of shit coins in the crypto space. Speaker 9: The first three attempts before the Federal Reserve, we had the Bank of North America, which was gonna have be Canada and The United States. That was the first central bank. Then we had the first Bank of the United States in Philadelphia, opposed by Thomas Jefferson supported by Alexander Hamilton. Then we had the second US Bank dissolved by Andrew Jackson. So Andrew Jackson had sufficiently kicked out the central bankers, in the eighteen thirties, and it took many, many decades again until they tried again to bring in a central bank to The United States. Speaker 6: We were living within a system where people had physical gold and they would deposit that gold in banks Speaker 8: and have paper banknotes issued in compensation for those physical gold coins. But when I hold these things, Speaker 0: everyone my age, millennials, gen z, we just think of this as the money. Right? But everyone older comes from a time when this was not the money. This was a representation of the gold. This was just a placeholder for gold that was actually in a vault somewhere and gold has to be dug out of the ground. Gold can't be invented out of thin air and so as long as this does represent gold, there's a limited supply. Speaker 8: Yeah. And for a long time that works, right? Until you have a run on the bank where everyone comes in to demand their gold Yeah. And what happens is 20% of people get their gold and the bank runs out of gold. And that's when you have a bank run and the bank collapses. Speaker 3: Nineteen o seven, this earthquake hit San Francisco, destroys all of these buildings. Those assets end up almost nearly worthless. And so you have these banks all across one of the biggest cities in America that are just going belly up and it causes contagion to other banks. It just takes one key player, one key event to trigger this domino wave. And basically, just set in motion all this banking panic. People were afraid, people were angry, because they look at the banks as if it was their fault. But at the same time, the gut reaction wasn't, let's give it all over to the government, because America had fought for like hundreds of years to not have one central party controlling all the banks. The American banking system was collapsing in real time from coast to coast, but instead of letting it crumble, distribute, and rebuild, seven key players saw an opportunity to overhaul the entire system. Speaker 5: Charles Norton, president of the First National Bank of New York. Speaker 0: Frank Vanderlip, president of National Citibank. Henry p Davison, senior partner and confidant of JPMorgan. A. Piat Andrew, Harvard economics professor and assistant secretary of the United States Treasury Department. Speaker 6: Benjamin Strong junior, vice president of the Bankers Trust Company. Speaker 5: Paul Warburg, a German born financier and descendant of the Warburg banking dynasty. Speaker 3: And finally, senator Nelson Aldrich, a US Senator from Rhode Island and chairman of the National Monetary Commission. Speaker 6: So Speaker 0: Aldrich is a general in the civil war. Right? But then after the civil war, he gets into politics eventually. The Panic of nineteen o seven happens. He gets appointed to a special panel. Speaker 8: He creates the National Monetary Commission whose sole purpose is to study the nineteen o seven banking crisis and then to create, you know, potentially a solution. The US banking system is not sufficiently centralized. There's too much risk and too many panics that, you know, frequently cause these banks to collapse. Speaker 0: He winds up creating Speaker 8: this Aldrich plan, which essentially evolved directly into creating the Federal Reserve. They organized this this meeting here at Jekyll Island First in New Jersey in in November of nineteen ten. Speaker 6: And they came here and held one of the most secret meetings of all time. The only person who knew who was involved in the meeting was JP Morgan because he is the one who provided them the Federal Reserve room. Speaker 3: And all Speaker 5: six of them wanted a way to come to Jekyll Island but without being seen together because at the time, if any journalist found them together, it would raise some flats. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 5: Because nobody at the time wanted the central bank. Speaker 9: And any reporter who asked, they just said, we're going down to Southern Georgia for duck hunting. No big deal. Speaker 5: Either duck hunting, getting away for the winter. So these six men all embarked on this journey to go from New York to Jekyll Island, which was around a two day trip. Two of them changed their name completely and all of them were instructed to use their first names. Speaker 8: And these six men essentially worked together for an entire weekend. They created this plan to create reserve banks and each reserve bank will create an issue a centralized currency that will become, you know, the the currency of The United States, the sole currency of The United States, eliminating the ability of individual banks to issue their own notes. Speaker 3: The goals of the Aldrich plan were to essentially create a central bank without calling it a central bank. So they did everything in their power to obfuscate it, to use different language, to try and distance themselves from this idea of one lending party that most of the public feared would end up basically absorbing every piece of capital and siphoning off all the wealth of the economy. Speaker 8: The problem with the original Aldrich plan is that it was overtly too pro banker. The Democrats, for anti centralized banking, shot it down, and so what they did is they modified it in several different ways. One of the ways they modified it was creating, you know, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors who would reside in Washington DC and were appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate. Now the interesting thing that they built into, you know, the the new Federal Reserve System was that that Board of Governors actually wouldn't have direct control over monetary policy. The one that would have that control was the New York Fed, the most influential of all the 12 Federal Reserve banks. Speaker 5: So they got President Wilson to sign the bill, and after their main priority was like, we're gonna have him sign it, and then we will alter the rules once it is signed. Speaker 9: Saying the word bank was like, it was a four four letter word. So that's why the Federal Reserve is not called a bank. They wanted to make it seem like it came from the government, so they called it federal. They wanted to make it seem like they actually had some assets, so they called it a reserve. It's neither federal and it's not a reserve. Speaker 5: But what I don't understand is how were they able to get away for it for so long? Because today, we see those banks and people trust those banks with their lives, which is funny to see that sort of shift from going to fearing central banking to loving them and being like the ride ride or die for the banks. Speaker 9: I think that's a testament to how successful this original meeting on Jekyll Island was in 1910. To go from an era where people distrusted banks to a hundred and fourteen years later, they completely trust banks, and they don't have any understanding as to why they should distrust banks. Speaker 6: We have an independent central bank that has served us well. We need to do our work in a way that's outside the political process to the maximum extent possible. Speaker 7: The Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means basically that there is no eight other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. Speaker 3: With all you know about the founding of the Federal Reserve, how do you feel about them today? Speaker 4: I all of your stuff. Speaker 3: She's gonna get I Speaker 5: plead the first. Speaker 9: Love that. The education has been complete in total, and I think if you could bring back to life the six members of the Jekyll Island meeting, I think they would be wildly impressed with how successful their project was a hundred and fourteen years later. Speaker 10: You know where we're going? We're going Speaker 3: to the San Suu Kyi Building owned by JP Morgan who is the largest banking baron in all America. We're gonna spend the night in one of his residences, which is really Speaker 4: cool. So Speaker 6: you can Speaker 0: have private about how you're gonna enslave the world. Speaker 5: My god. Speaker 4: Scheme scheme about how to force all the other banks to find your bank and Speaker 0: and escape after banging your friend's wife. Speaker 3: This cottage behind me belonged to the Rockefellers, one of the richest families in American history. But it has a really, really dark secret that we're gonna explore. We are at Indian Mound Cottage, also known as the Rockefeller Cottage. Yes, those Rockefellers. Now, why is this place called the Indian Mound Cottage? When the French first arrived here, they were greeted by a tribe of Indians called the Gwali Indians, and also the Timucua Indians of this region. Those Indians, in some of the logs from the French explorers, were said to be at times, either six foot eight to seven and a half feet tall. So they were giant, massive. And unlike a lot of other encounters, these Indians were actually really receptive to the French explorers that had come to these lands and wanted to engage in trade relations with them. The Indians start to show them some of their culture, their rituals, the things that they do. One of the nights what happens is there's a big circle of dancing men and women and they're cheering and they're doing a dance. One of the shamans dressed in this garb comes up to one of the Frenchmen and shows them this stone pillar, this altar, or perhaps a mount. A woman comes out with the body of child, no older than two, three years old. And without getting into more gruesome detail, the child's life is taken, and the child is placed upon the altar, and the ritual, the dances continue. The Frenchmen get very creeped out, and they decide, yep, let's continue onwards down the river here, down in Georgia, and maybe find somewhere else to post up. We know that there are accounts of native tribes all around The Americas partaking, the Aztecs, the Mayans, and perhaps the Guala Indians partaking in child sacrifice. And yet, with this historical record, known by quite a few people that have moved here, the Rockefellers decided to build their cottage on what is perceived to be one of the exact sites of one of these rituals. Speaker 5: I feel, since I live on an island, I feel that being on an island, you can get away with so much. And that's something that is super underrated because nobody talks about it. Speaker 3: Yeah. You're kinda right. Like, some of the most heinous crimes, secret meetings, like terrible things have all happened on islands, Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, Alcatraz, Epstein Island, the Federal Reserve. The meeting on Jekyll Island went completely unknown to the public for five years after it occurred without much fanfare. One of Jekyll's secret collaborators, Frank Vanderlip, wrote an article for the Saturday Evening Post admitting to the events that had taken place. Several other participants confessed details shortly after. But by that time, the American public no longer cared. They were embroiled in the First World War, the first war funded by central bankers both from the East and the West, and the first that could foreshadow a century of war untethered from the restraints of the banking systems of the past. Speaker 0: After World War two, this is the first time that we've had the Fed in charge in The United States after a major war has just swept Europe, and The US is clearly on top in the global order. They've got all this industry and all this power and they have this meeting called Bretton Woods where they're gonna heal the global financial system, reset the global monetary system because everyone is decimated. And this is where they make dollar, the US dollar, the global reserve currency and they set up a system by which every other country is going to be beholden to the US dollar and to the Federal Reserve System. On one hand, they'll manipulate another country with monetary policy and try to force countries to do their bidding through monetary coercion. And if they don't comply, then they have the jackals, the CIA, to come around as the muscle and to overthrow the government or to assassinate someone or to start a coup or whatever it is. And so now you've gone from the Federal Reserve taking over The United States and The United States money. And then after World War two, the whole global monetary system needs to be rebuilt and they rebuild it in the Fed's image using the American dollar while founding the covert military force essentially that is going to enforce that dollar supremacy all around the world. Speaker 8: After after World War two, we see the expansion of this dollar system. You know, for a few years there's quiet peace and quiet as the CIA is built up and you know, the IMF starts to make these these loans to poor countries and basically extort them out of their assets and get them to use their votes and their power in the UN to support US foreign policy and as compensation for the loans that they make, they get their land or their natural resources as collateral that can be sold off to US corporations. So essentially what it does is it, you're right, globalizes The US corporate interests and allows them to gain more wealth and more power and status than ever before. Speaker 3: In the Dune universe, they talk about spice, this this magical element that enlightens and awakens people and it's kind of this thing that all the nations are are fighting over and our version of that is credit. It allows us to exceed, you know, the boundaries of our actual country's productivity by borrowing from the future. We're literally taking something out of time to enable us to do you know, superhuman things in the present. And it again, it's it's just like a drug. It's just it has all the qualities of the perfect type of addictive concoction. Speaker 9: Oh, absolutely. Politicians, they they could never ask their citizens to fund, wars or other projects. Speaker 3: Yeah. Speaker 9: And so this is the easy way for governments to get the money without asking their citizenry. They actually take it from their citizenry in the form of inflation. Speaker 3: Do you know about the Federal Reserve and what happened on this island? Speaker 6: I'm actually giving them a tour, telling them about it right now. Speaker 3: Oh, that's amazing. What do you think so far? Speaker 6: Great. Oh, fantastic. Awesome. Speaker 5: Feels at ease, you know, like nothing can go wrong here. There's peace. It's So it's relatively small. It's peaceful. It's deserted. Speaker 3: It kinda lulls you to sleep. This kind of of the bugs, like they're playing a concert that's stream directly in your ears. This island really is a pretty place, a beauty to hold. But underneath all of the the greenery, the animals here, the well maintained lawns, the cheery people we see riding on bikes. There's some really, really dark history. Speaker 11: Is that tax money that the Fed is spending? Speaker 2: It's not tax money. The banks have, accounts with the Fed much the same way that you have an account in a commercial bank. So to lend to a bank, we simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account that they have with the Fed. So it's much more akin, although not exactly the same, but it's much more akin to printing money than it is to borrowing. Speaker 12: Will you tell the American people to whom you lent 2,200,000,000,000.0 of their dollars? Federal Reserve's discount tell us who they are. No. Because the reason Speaker 5: that Speaker 4: And Ben Bernanke, in a statement at a Wall Street dinner, said in front of everyone, he said, we know that the Fed we now know that the Fed was responsible for the nineteen thirties Great Depression. And he said, we're sorry and we promise it won't happen again. Yeah. So he knew. And again, he is Ben Bernanke was a a student of Great Depression. Right? He His dissertation, his PhD thesis was on the Great Depression. He studied it his entire life. And he understood that the Fed was the per was the sole you know, one of the sole contributors to the destruction and the loss of life and the economic catastrophe that was the Great Depression. Speaker 3: And then fifty eight years after the founding of the Federal Reserve, something changed. Speaker 11: I have directed secretary Connolly to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets. Your dollar will be worth just as much tomorrow as it is today. Speaker 3: Spoiler alert, it wasn't temporary. Every single thing that the Fed has done and created through monetary policy has destroyed the common person at every single level and has enriched those that are insulated and those who have asymmetric information about how that system works. The Fed is responsible for creating and abetting, you Speaker 4: know, most of the financial crises. The Fed, with this zero interest rate policy in QE, has created the worst wealth gap. We're we're at levels of wealth inequality that we haven't seen since the French Revolution. Speaker 0: A huge portion of the value we're producing for the world is being siphoned out of our collective coffers. We're all living on sort of taxed time without even realizing it. They're not stealing money. They're stealing our time. They're stealing our, you know, health and happiness. They're stealing your ability to support your whole family on a single paycheck. In Speaker 3: a place steeped in history and shadowed by secrets, how do you even begin to push back against the weight of it all? Speaker 12: Oh, the money's down, slipping through our hands, time they steal under their command. Speaker 4: The actions of the Fed affect everything, down to the mental health and the stability of families. So this can be seen in, you know, graphs and rates of suicide and depression among young men who have been unable to find work. Right? Largely because of the boom bust cycles the Fed has created. In my family, after 02/2008, my brother who was in real estate, who was a broker, lost his business and basically spent a decade, hopping between jobs, surfing on couches, living at home, you know, battling with depression, battling with nihilism. And he was unable to get ahead in life and build a business and build back credit because of the debt and the over speculation that had ruined him, that had popped and completely ruined his his financial future. And seeing him completely destroyed by that was very painful for me growing up. He was my next oldest brother. He was the person I was closest to and the person I admired and see him hurt by that and just be hopeless and not know what to do was very difficult because what the Fed does is is insidious. They're not overtly marching into a town and destroying some jobs or overtly stealing somebody's money or overtly closing a bank account. But their actions and the side effects of those actions of the 0% interest rates and the boom and bust cycles destroy much of the real economy. Post 02/2008, you know, the economy changed. We allowed the banks to live and the small business owners and the entrepreneurs to get crushed and that wealth effectively evaporated from their hands and was transferred to the wealthy. The Fed robs us through the boom and bust cycles that they create and they socialize the losses by running QE and inflating the debt away and every time that debt is used to bail out the wealthy and the connected and the powerful over and over and over again. Speaker 6: You know, there's a lot of focus on on, you know, New York billionaires these days, but my favorite one is not running. Speaker 5: Ah. That Speaker 10: compromise is not a bad word. Compromise is what democracy is all about. That you get most of the people get a good percentage of what they want, a handful of people on the two Sigmas out get almost nothing, and then that's the way we come together and move. Their vain attempt to Speaker 4: kill the credit cycle has created this financial gravity that's trapped the federal government as well as most private citizens in a debt trap in the singularity and it's crushing. You know? If you're in debt, especially student loan debt, you can't discharge that via bankruptcy. You're trapped for life. Jefferson once said, right, there are two ways to enslave a nation, by the sword or by debt. And the Fed succeeded in doing it through debt. Speaker 9: I played a lot of monopoly as a kid, and I was always fascinated by why the bank can never go bankrupt, because they can just print more money. So here we are at the birthplace of the American version of Speaker 0: the bank that can't go bankrupt and can print more money for any reason. Because the moment that you tokenize, dollarize, the exchange of my life's value for your life's value, that opens it up to greed, to manipulation, and to bad actors. Speaker 5: They keep you so tired and so busy that you don't even wanna question anything. They bombard you with the nine to five job. They make both the mom and the dad work. They make your children go to school and be raised by the system. Speaker 0: And they hide it as though it's the government. They hide it as though it's the US government, but the actual empire is the wealthy bankers on top. The way you make money in today's world is by sinning. Right? Greed, gluttony, right? Adultery, like all of the sins Only money. Boom. They're all incentivized. And when everyone is in a world of scarcity, and the incentive is to sin in order to escape scarcity, and everyone that is scarce and not sinning is inherently less kind. When you don't have enough, you certainly aren't gonna share. You aren't gonna be nice. You're gonna be stressed. You're gonna be irritable. Bad for your health. So everyone who's not making it is in their own form of hell. And everyone that is making it is building their own form of hell. Right? And so the system it's whether they design it that way or not, the Federal Reserve sets up a world where it pays to sin. And if you won't sin, you'll be poor. And they teach it to you from birth through the music, the movies, the celebrities, all their idols right from birth. Speaker 13: After two or three hundred years of crimes, all governments put their hands and stopped any further developments. Governments say it must not develop any further. We are not allowed to experiment on it. Money hasn't been improved. Money has has rather become worse in the course of time. I don't believe that we should ever have a good money again before we take the thing out of the hands of government. We can't take them violently out of the hands of government. All we can do is buy some sly around because and to do something they can't stop. Speaker 5: So I regard the Federal Reserve as one of the most transparent central banks in the world. Speaker 10: We That's a statement. Plain. What what do you fear about the audit?
Saved - March 23, 2025 at 12:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the JFK files, highlighting the roles of the CIA, Mossad, and the Mafia in President Kennedy's assassination. These powerful entities manipulated U.S. policies and conducted illegal operations against his wishes. JFK aimed to bring about change but was seen as a threat by those in power. I believe we are witnessing a similar struggle today, as the same forces are being exposed and dismantled for the benefit of humanity. Their control is ending, and they are aware of this shift.

@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF

The JFK files overview of how and why the CIA, Mossad, and the Mafia were responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. From the backchannels into the U.S. from Mossad, pulling the strings and policies in America, AIPAC and their nuclear program, the CIA running clandestine and highly illegal operations against President Kennedy's wishes and orders against Americans and foreign governments, to the interference of the Italian Mafia's illegal operations throughout the U.S. JFK tried to make a difference and make things right. But the powerful agencies, mobsters, and foreign countries knew that JFK had to be eliminated. He was in the way and a problem that just wasn't simply going to go away. JFK's life was shattered before he could shatter Israel, the Mafia, and the CIA into a thousand pieces themselves. History is repeating itself right now, and these same forces, this globalist deep state cabal, is being exposed and completely eradicated for the benefit of humanity's future, and the world itself. Their reign of power and control, their reign of tyranny is over... And they know it. Video: @MyronGainesX and @sneako

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, JFK's assassination was a conspiracy involving the Italian mafia, the CIA, and Zionists. The CIA wanted JFK gone because he threatened to dismantle their rogue operations and disliked Director Alan Dulles. The mafia felt betrayed after JFK's father allegedly made a deal to rig the election, and then JFK's brother, RFK, targeted them as Attorney General. The FBI was allegedly neutered in investigating the mafia because Hoover was being blackmailed by Meyer Lansky of the Jewish mafia. Israel wanted JFK dead because he threatened their nuclear program, which they developed secretly after stealing uranium with the help of the French. The speaker claims politicians knew of Israel's involvement. Lyndon B. Johnson allegedly forced his way onto the ticket as VP by threatening to expose JFK's adultery. Lee Harvey Oswald was a patsy; there were multiple shooters, including Jack Valenti and David Ferry, CIA contractors. Jack Valenti allegedly fired the kill shot. Jack Ruby, real name Jacob Rubinstein, killed Oswald and confessed he did it for Israel and the Jewish people. The Zapruder film was filmed by Abraham Zapruder, a Jewish Zionist. Oliver Stone's movie JFK was funded by Arnaud Milchan, a Jewish Zionist billionaire involved in covering up Israel's nuclear program.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Byron, who killed JFK? Speaker 1: It's a combination of three people, Italian mafia, the CIA, and the Zionists. Speaker 0: Why did they wanna kill JFK? He was a good president, first Catholic. What do have against him? Speaker 1: Well, that's a complex question, but a lot of people wanted JFK gone. We'll start with the CIA. Threatened to smash it into a million pieces because he didn't like all the rogue operations they had going on. It was a clandestine operation and they were doing a bunch of things that he disliked internationally. And he didn't like Alan Duluth, the founder of the CIA. For the Mossad, so the Italian mafia won't have gone because they felt like they were betrayed. What ended up happening was JFK's father struck a deal with the Italian mafia to rig the election out of Illinois to help him win a close election against Nixon. What ended up happening was they rigged the election and ensured that he won because Illinois is obviously a very important state to win. And once JFK came into power and administration took over, he appointed his brother, RFK, as the attorney general. As the attorney general, you're the chief law enforcement officer of The United States. You oversee the FBI. You oversee the department of justice. You oversee all the main investigatory agencies. The FBI and the Department of Justice led a probe into the mafia, which they had been trying to avoid for a very long time. Why? Because Hoover was being blackmailed by Meyer Lansky, head of the Jewish mafia, which we're gonna talk about them here in a second. And he had a pictures of him in heels, and he was also homosexual, which back then was a big deal. You lose your clearance, lose your job, etcetera. So this is a big reason why the FBI was neutered when it came to investigating the mafia and how they were able to kind of run with impunity for so long. But RFK brought the mafia in and not only did he bring them in to answer questions, he brought them in with television cameras all over the place. And this was obviously a big deal for them because they've been able to operate with impunity for so long. Speaker 0: So it was sexual black male? Like Epstein? Speaker 1: Almost. Yeah. Yeah. He had compromising photos of him hooking up with his deputy director. And it was widely known that Hoover was gay. It's just that the general public didn't know it. Speaker 0: How are they able to get away with it and call it a conspiracy for so many years? Speaker 1: Well, they've been able to hide behind, classifying it and, you know, releasing things here and there, changing the names of certain things and they've been able to kind of avoid it. And the biggest reason why they're still classified and this is what everyone doesn't wanna talk about is because our greatest ally was absolutely involved in the death of John f Kennedy and his brother. Speaker 0: Why would our greatest ally kill one of the most beloved presidents of all time? Speaker 1: Because he threatened their nuclear program. Speaker 0: Why was Israel building a nuclear program? Speaker 1: Well, after the Suez Canal crisis in '56, if I'm not mistaken, Israel understood that they needed the nuclear bomb to be able to deter the Arab world from, continuing to attack them. And they understood that if they didn't have nuclear superiority in the region, it would greatly affect their ability to exist into the continuing decades. So what ended up happening was they stole uranium from Pennsylvania out of Apollo, Pennsylvania from a factory and they smuggled it to Israel. And they started running a nuclear program out of the moment, and they did this secretly with the aid of the French. Speaker 0: Are American politicians aware of Israel's involvement in the murder of the FK? Speaker 1: I don't know if the contemporary politicians know, but the politicians back in the day absolutely knew. And they played a role because they wanted him gone. And Kennedy had a lot of enemies. To include his vice president Lyndon B. Johnson. Lyndon B. Johnson actually strong armed Kennedy by becoming his vice president because he knew that he had a problem with women. He was a womanizer. And they basically told him, look, if you don't put me on the ticket as your vice president, we're gonna come out and expose the fact that you've been committing adultery, which back then in the sixties and fifties, guys, was a big deal. Adultery as a, you know, Catholic president would be a death sentence for his political career. Speaker 0: Why would the Italian mob murder JFK if he was the first Catholic president? What do they have to Speaker 1: gain from the his murder? The ability to continue to do their crimes in secret. You know, the mafia, they call it the oath of silence, right, Ulmerta. And they thrive on people not knowing what they do. That's why it's literally called the Cosa Nostra stands for our thing. And when they say our thing, they truly do mean that. Kennedy was though he was Catholic, he was Irish. He wasn't Italian. So, you know, when it comes to organized crime in The United States back then, and even to this day, you have to be of Italian descent to be a part of the mafia. Now the Jewish mafia was able to work with the Italian mafia because they were able to lend in financial assistance, and Marielanski was damn near like, you know, the bankroll for it alongside Bugsy Siegel. And they worked intimately together because Marielansky was crucial in getting Lucky Luciano out of prison in exchange for a deal with the office of naval intelligence during world war two. But the long story short is is Kennedy and his brother, most importantly, RFK, compromised the mafia by exposing their illegal activities to the American public, especially in television or on television. Speaker 0: So is this information enough to determine if Israel is our greatest ally or not? Speaker 1: Well, I think the reason why they've been hiding it for so long is because it would clearly prove that they're not our greatest ally. They've been involved in the assassination of a sitting president. I mean, I find it interesting how the only person that was able to capture the assassination on video was a Jewish Zionist named Abraham Zapruder. And then if you fast forward forty or fifty years later in 09/11/2001, who was there to document nine eleven more Jewish Zionists and dancing at it as well. So I think if the American public understood that our greatest ally might not necessarily be our greatest ally and that they're there at pivotal times in American history documenting it for financial gain later on because Abraham's recruiter sell sold that video for quite a bit of money in American dollars today, a couple million. I think he sold it for about 100 to hundred 50 k. And if you do that in today's dollars, somewhere around a million or 2. I don't think the American public would want to continue to support our greatest ally anymore if they knew this stuff. Speaker 0: How were they able to get away with it? It was televised. There was a big crowd in Dallas. How could they have with a sniper and everything? What type of military what did they use to get away with this? Speaker 1: Well, the most important thing is to understand number one that Oswald was not the actual shooter. Oswald was a patsy, just like he said. He wasn't even there when all this went down. There were multiple shooters. I think five or six to be exact. I broke this down on a podcast of mine. But what you need to know is there are people on a grassy knoll. There There are people in a book depository, and the shooters were put in a position where they waited till they got to a certain point, and then they started shooting, and it was basically a bloodbath from there. The magic bullet theory is a lie, and now it's put there to kind of build on the lie that there was a single shooter. But Oswald was not the shooter. And as a matter of fact, they knew this. That's why they had to kill him. And the person that went ahead and killed him, Jacob Rubinstein. Not Jack Ruby, Jack Rubinstein. And he confessed to his rabbi and to his doctor that he did it for Israel and for the Jewish people. Why would he need to kill a guy who killed a US president for the Jewish people? Speaker 0: Okay, Myron. Who killed JFK? Speaker 1: There were a bunch of different shooters on that day, but the shooters that I'll tell you guys that definitely you need to know about that they'll never tell you about are Jack Valenti and a guy named David Ferry. Speaker 0: Why do they never tell us about them? Speaker 1: Well, Jack Valenti is right there on Air Force one as Lyndon B. Johnson is being sworn in. He's right there on the corner. See his eyes like this, and he's all sweaty and disheveled. It's because he had just assassinated a sitting US president. He was the one that fired the the kill shot. Speaker 0: So who were the others involved if he was the one who shot? Speaker 1: Well, David Ferry also shot, at him as well, and the other guy shot from the Book Depository. They were CIA contractor guys. Speaker 0: How many shooters were Speaker 1: there? Roughly six to Speaker 0: eight. All CIA? Speaker 1: Pretty much. The weird thing with the CIA is they don't have actual employees. They have people that are contractors, people that are affiliated, people that are actual real employees. There's different types of employees within the CIA. Speaker 0: So they were contracted by who? Speaker 1: That's what's in the classified documents. Speaker 0: Who do you suspect? Speaker 1: I think it was a combination of multiple entities that wanting him gone, whether it was the Israeli intelligence component with the Mossad or the CIA themselves because we know that they had an extra grind with JFK or, the Italian mafia as well working together. And there's been many document instances where the mafia would work with intelligence agencies to do their dirty work for them. Speaker 0: Who what names do you remember that are involved? Speaker 1: Off the top of my head, the ones that they never talk about, Jack Valenti and David Ferry. They were the guys in a grassy knoll, and Jack Valenti was the one that fired the kill shot that blew his head open. Because when you look at the film, you could see the head go back like this. Clearly, that shot came from the front, and then the head blew out the back. And I also find it interesting too because the most famous movie that documents all of this was a movie called JFK directed by Oliver Stone. But then you dig a little bit deeper and you find out Oliver Stone's real name is Silverstein. Then you find out that the person that funded the movie JFK was a guy named Arnaud Milchan, billionaire, Jewish Zionist. Another fun thing. He was a part of the intelligence program that worked on covering Israel's unacknowledged nuclear program. So let me get this straight. The most important movie and the most popular movie that documents Kennedy's assassination in American culture is a movie that was funded by a Jewish Zionist billionaire that conveniently leaves out the Zionist angle, and he's a part of the intelligence program that Kennedy tried to stop with the nuclear program. Speaker 0: So do you think Oliver Stone knew about this from the jump, or was he was he also a contracted Speaker 1: I think he has good intentions, but at the end of the day, the people that foot the bill get to dictate the movie. And in this case, it was a billionaire guy that just so happened to be Israeli intelligence and worked on making sure Israel's nuclear program was never publicly acknowledged. Speaker 0: What was the Grassy Knoll? Speaker 1: The Grassy Knoll was an area where there was a fence where people and multiple witnesses said that they heard shots fired from. And it makes sense because when you look at the way JFK was hit and the way that his body and his head pulled back like this, it's very obvious that the shots came from the front. But everyone tries to sit there and say the single bullet theory from the book of depository because that is what makes Oswald the alleged shooter. And that's why they had to kill Oswald because he wasn't there. And they knew when the evidence actually came out and Dallas Police Department had to go ahead and figure out who actually killed him, there would have been a problem with them being able to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. So they needed him dead because he would have blew a hole in the entire story. Another funny thing a lot of people don't know, when Oswald was perk walked in front of the Dallas police department, he was instructed to be perk walked like that by a guy named Sam Bloom. Who's Sam Bloom? One of the members of the Texas Citizens Council that funded that trip for JFK to come down to Dallas. And who ran the Texas Citizens Council? Bunch of Zionists from the Benai birth, which Abraham Zapruder was also a member of. Abraham who? Zapruder, the guy that filmed the filmed the entire incident. The Zapruder film. Speaker 0: That's the only video? Speaker 1: It's the only video of the incident. The Zapruder film. So he was there at the perfect time to capture that historic moment. And then when Oswald is killed, walked in front of Dallas police department against the instruction of the FBI, by the way, and he's shot by Jack Ruby. And the person that told the Dallas police department to move him was another Jewish Zionist. Speaker 0: And who is Jack Ruby? Speaker 1: Jack Ruby was also a Jewish Zionist really named Jacob Rubenstein. He was, the guy that killed Oswald that couldn't let this seeker get out as to who was really behind the assassination. And the other thing that's interesting that a lot of people need to know is that Jack Rubinstein admitted to his rabbi and to other confidentials or confidants that he did it for the Jewish people and for Israel. Speaker 0: What was Lee Harvey Oswald's involvement? Speaker 1: He was just the patsy. He was the fall guy. And this is gonna sound crazy, but the Oswald that was at the movie theater when he was captured is not the same Oswald that they think worked at the Book Depository. Those multiple Oswalds. Speaker 0: Did they get the right one? No. What happened to the real Oswald? Speaker 1: The real Oswald wasn't even there. He wasn't at the Book Depository. And it kinda makes sense because why would they have the patsy who was supposed to take the blame for this that close to the actual event compromise everything? He was told to go to the movie theater by someone else. And another reason why we know this is because when the police officer was shot, tippet if I'm not mistaken, one of the witnesses that saw him get shot said that she saw two assailants running after he was shot. One of those guys was a dude named Lawrence. Who is Lawrence Howard? Lawrence Howard was actually one of the shooters on the Book Depository, CIA contractor. He was there when the Oswald the fake Oswald, one of his body doubles, shot and killed JD Tippett, the Dallas Police Officer. And one of the witnesses that was there was a black woman. She actually said she saw two individuals running from the scene after Tippett was killed. The rival who goes very deep with JFK. Speaker 0: Do you think the JFK files will ever be released? Speaker 1: I don't think so, man. I think if the American public knew that a foreign government, Israel, and a tug's agency, the CIA, and organized crime, the mafia, colluded together to kill a sitting US president, they would never trust the government again. And government trusts that it's all time low. The files would Speaker 0: only Speaker 1: exacerbate the problem.
Saved - May 16, 2025 at 6:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I urge every American citizen to watch this crucial 24-minute video that reveals the corruption in our financial system. It's a must-see! Also, check out "The Greatest Show on Earth" by @GoodLionTV for more insights.

@Juliesnark1731 - 🇺🇸🍩 JULIE DONUTS 🇺🇸🍩

Every American Citizen MUST WATCH THIS. It’s about 24mins long, so save it and watch when you can. It breaks down our financial system and is the most impactful and important video you will ever watch to see WHY IT IS A SCAM, CORRUPT AF AND GOING AWAY!!! SHARE IT! 👏🏻🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
The modern banking system creates currency faster than nature. Politicians create deficit spending, which is paid for by Treasury bonds (IOUs). Banks buy these bonds and sell them to the Federal Reserve at a profit. The Federal Reserve creates currency by writing checks on accounts with zero balance, giving the currency to banks, who then buy more bonds. The Treasury deposits this currency, and the government spends it. When currency is deposited in banks, it is loaned out through fractional reserve lending, expanding the currency supply. 92-96% of all currency is created by the banking system, leading to inflation. Taxes are used to pay interest on bonds the Federal Reserve bought with essentially nothing. The system requires ever-increasing debt and will eventually collapse. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation owned by banks, who profit through interest and dividends. The system funnels wealth to the government and banking sector, causing economic booms and busts and wealth disparity. The solution is to understand the system, share the knowledge, and join the conversation to design a new monetary system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They say that money doesn't grow on trees, but the truth is that the modern banking system creates currency far faster than trees can grow. Most people don't have a clue how currency is created economists and bankers make it sound so complex that people think they can't understand it but I'm going to strip our monetary system down to its essence so that you can see the scam behind the curtain and just how it world's currency, I'm gonna use The United States as our example. It all starts when some politician says, vote for me and I'll make sure the government provides you more free stuff than my opponent will but there's no such thing as a free lunch so to provide that supposedly free stuff the politicians vote for the country to spend more than its income this is called deficit spending to pay for that deficit spending the Treasury borrows currency by issuing a bond so what's a bond? If you think about it a bond is really nothing but a glorified IOU it's a pretty piece of paper with numbers print on it that says loan me a trillion dollars today and I promise over a ten year period I'm gonna pay you back that trillion dollars plus interest but what you need to understand is that treasury bonds are our national debt these glorified IOUs are to be paid back by you and I and our descendants through future taxation therefore when the government issues a bond it steals prosperity out of the future so that it can spend it today the Treasury then holds a bond auction and the world's largest banks show up and compete to buy part of our national debt and make a profit on it by earning interest you'll notice that as we move through this process the big banks are there taking a cut every step of the way this isn't by chance as you'll see shortly then through a shell game called open market operations the banks get to sell some of those bonds to the Federal Reserve at a profit To pay for the bonds the Federal Reserve opens up its big old checkbook and writes bad bogus counterfeit checks that should bounce because they're drawn on an account that always has a zero balance there isn't 1 penny in there. To quote from the Boston Federal Reserve, When you or I write a check, there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover that check. But when the Federal Reserve writes a check, there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve writes a check, it is creating money. The Fed then hands those checks to the banks and at this point currency springs into existence. The banks then take that currency and buy more bonds at the next Treasury auction. But what is a check? A check is also an IOU. When you write a check you're making a note that says here's my IOU for cash all you have to do is go to the bank and pick it up. Now it's very very important that you understand this process because we're going to come back later and show you the devastating effect this has on you. The Treasury issues IOUs, bonds. The banks then buy those IOUs with currency. The Federal Reserve then writes checks, and hands them to the banks in exchange for the Treasury's IOUs, the bonds, and currency is created. So what's really happening is the Federal Reserve and the Treasury are just swapping IOUs, using the banks as middlemen and abracadabra presto currency magically springs into existence. This process repeats and repeats over and over again enriching the banks and in debting the public by raising the national debt. The end result is that there's a buildup of bonds at the Federal Reserve and currency at the Treasury. This process is also where all paper currency comes from. The Federal Reserve and the government mistakenly call it base money because they didn't watch episode one of this series and they don't know the difference between money and currency. But I will correctly refer to it as base currency because it is not money. It is currency and as we've learned, there is a big difference. Money has to be a store of value and maintain its purchasing power over long periods of time. We learned in episode one that earlier in our history, our paper currency was just a claim check. It was a representation for real money of intrinsic value, the gold and silver that was held on deposit at the treasury. You could walk into any bank and slap your currency, like, say, a $20 bill on the counter and redeem it for real money, a $20 gold piece. But now this base currency that's piling up back here is really nothing but a receipt or a claim check on an IOU, that bond. So it's really nothing but a supply of numbers. The treasury then deposits the newly created currency into the various branches of the government, and the politicians say, hey, thanks for that. And the government does some deficit spending on public works, social programs, and war. The government employees, contractors, and soldiers then deposit their pay in the banks. Now this may come as a shock to you, but when you deposit your currency with the bank, you're not actually depositing it into an account to be safely held in trust for you. Instead, you're actually loaning the bank your currency, and within certain legal limits, they can do with it pretty much anything they please. This includes gambling in the stock market and loaning it out at a profit, of course. Now this is where the machine of currency creation really gets cranking because this is where something called fractional reserve lending comes into play. Fractional reserve lending is exactly what it says. The banks are allowed to reserve only a fraction of your deposit and loan the rest out. Although reserve ratios may vary I'm going to use a 10% reserve ratio as our example. If you deposit $100 in your account the bank can legally take $90 of it and loan it out without telling you. The bank must hold $10 of your deposit in reserve just in case you want some of it. These reserves are called vault cash. But why does your bank account still say you have $100 if the bank has stolen $90 of it? Because the bank left IOUs it created called bank credit in its place. Now I know this sounds crazy, but here it is in black and white from the Fed. Commercial banks create checkbook money when they grant a loan simply by adding new deposit dollars in accounts on their books in exchange for a borrower's IOU. These are nothing but numbers that the banks type into their computers. And even though these bank credit IOU numbers are very different from base currency numbers because they only exist in computers, they are still currency. So now there is $190 in existence. Now the reason people take out loans from the banks is to buy something. They're going to buy a house or a car or something like that. So the borrower takes the $90 the bank loaned to him from your account and he pays the seller of the item. But then the seller deposits that currency into his account and his bank loans out 90% of that and leaves bank credit numbers in its place. So now there's $271 in existence. This process repeats and repeats until under a 10% reserve ratio. An initial deposit of just $100 can create up to $1,000 of bank credit all backed by $100 of vault cash, just 10%. But as I said, reserve ratios vary wildly. On some deposits it's 10% on others it's 3% and on some forms of deposits reserve requirements are zero the result is that the expansion of the currency supply by the banks is far greater than even this example would lead you to believe so once again when currency is deposited in the banks the banks get to lend it out and then it gets redeposited and relent redeposited and relent redeposited and relent over and over again creating bank credit all the way this is where the vast majority of our currency supply comes from in fact 92 to 96% of all currency in existence is created not by the government but here in the banking system now massive amounts of currency spewing into society may at first sound like a fun idea that is until you remember one of the most important hidden secrets of money from episode one that the prices of everyday goods and services act as a sponge on expanding currency supply. The more currency we have, the more prices rise. This is where inflation comes from. The true definition of inflation is an expansion of the currency supply. Rising prices are merely the symptom. So our entire currency supply is nothing but a couple of bucks whipped up in this hocus pocus scam where the treasury and the Federal Reserve swap glorified IOUs and a bunch of numbers that the banks just type into their computers. That's it. That's our entire currency supply. It's nothing but a supply of numbers. Some of them printed, most of them typed, and there is nothing else. But if you thought that was crazy, get ready to enter the twilight zone of modern economics. We work for some of that currency supply. True wealth is your time, but we trade away moments of our lives hour by hour, day by day, and year by year for numbers that somebody printed on pieces of paper or just typed into a computer. Now those numbers represent our blood, sweat, tears, labor, ideas, and talent. We are what gives the currency its value. But here comes the really cool joke. We work hard so that we can save some of that currency, so that we can pay the tax collector in The United States, it's known as the IRS. They then turn it over to the treasury so that the treasury can pay the principal plus interest on that bond that the Federal Reserve bought with a check drawn on an account that has nothing in it. Now let's do a recap on this section because this is where the system begins to rob you and I on a massive scale. Much of our taxes are not used for schools, roads, and public services but to pay interest on bonds that the Federal Reserve bought with a check drawn on an account that has nothing in it. The Federal Reserve is committing fraud But here's one of the biggest secrets of them all. Before the establishment of the Federal Reserve there was no need for personal income tax. The Federal Reserve was created in 1913 and that very same year the Constitution was amended to allow income tax. Do you really think this was just a coincidence? Ask yourself how much income tax you've paid over your lifetime. Much of it has been silently siphoned away into the hands of those who own the system. Yes, this system has owners. Who they are is an even bigger secret that we'll get to shortly, but we need to understand the mumbo jumbo of the so called debt ceiling. It's all based on a huge paradox. There was interest due on that bond and there was interest due on every one of those loans that the banks made. That means that there is interest due on every dollar in existence. Let me ask you something. If you borrow the very first dollar into existence and that's the only dollar that exists on the planet, but you promise to pay it back plus another dollar's worth of interest, where do you get the second dollar to pay the interest? The answer is that you have to borrow that one into existence and promise to pay it back with interest as well. So now there are $2 in existence, but you owe 4, and so on and so on. The result is there's never enough currency to pay the debt. There is always more debt in the system than there is currency in existence to pay the debt. Therefore, the whole system is impossible. It is finite. It will come to an end one day. What would happen if the government stopped borrowing to do deficit spending? Are the payments on those treasury bonds going to stop? What would happen if the public stopped borrowing and going deeper into debt? Are your house and car payments going to stop? No. There is a payment due every month interest on every dollar in existence and those payments do not stop. If we stop borrowing then no new currency is created to replace the currency that we used to make those payments. Whether you're making a payment on a loan or paying tax to make a payment on a bond, the portion of the payment that goes to pay off the principal extinguishes that portion of the debt. But the debt also extinguishes the currency. Currency and debt are like matter and antimatter. When they meet, they annihilate each other. If we just pay off the principal only on all the loans and bonds that exist, the entire currency supply just vanishes. So if we don't go deeper into debt every year, look what happens. The whole thing goes into a deflationary collapse under the weight of those payments. Politicians and pundits alike talk about balancing the budget, paying down the debt, and living within our means. They don't understand that that is deflationary. It is impossible to do under our current monetary system without collapsing the whole economy. This is why any talk of a debt ceiling is not only ridiculous, it's delusional. The system is designed to require ever increasing levels of debt just to continue and that's why politicians will always kick the can down the road and raise this so called debt ceiling over and over again until the whole system finally collapses under its own weight in other words they don't want it to collapse on their watch. The founding fathers of The United States knew the dangers of central banking and fought to free themselves from this very thing. The Revolutionary War started out as a tax revolt but now we must pay tax just to have a monetary system. Having just suffered through the hyperinflation of the continental dollar which was printed into oblivion to finance the Revolutionary War they understood the dangers of fiat currency and debt based monetary systems so to protect future generations from institutional theft and out of control government they wrote into the constitution that only gold and silver can be money for the simple fact that you can't print them. Our current system is not only unconstitutional but it robs us of the liberty and prosperity our forefathers fought and died for. We are all feeling the effects of ignoring the constitution right now by forcing more currency into circulation our purchasing power is diluted inflation is a slow and insidious stealth tax that is simply the result of this debt based monetary system. This system empowers and benefits those who create the currency and receive it first as they get to spend it into circulation before it has an effect on the economy. They're stealing purchasing power from you and transferring it to the banks and the government every hour of every day because of this false monetary system. And it's not like the people at the top don't know this. To quote the Federal Reserve, the decrease in purchasing power incurred by the holders of money due to inflation imparts gains to the issuers of money. This is a fraud. It is a pyramid scheme. It is a Ponzi scheme. It's a scam, and it's a lie. Our entire monetary system is nothing but a form of legalized theft. But here's the biggest con job of them all. The Federal Reserve is not federal. It has stockholders. There is no federal agency that has stockholders. What's a stockholder? A share of stock represents a percentage of ownership in a corporation. So the stockholders are the owners of that corporation. Therefore, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation with owners. And you can see it for yourself if you go to the Federal Reserve's website and it will say the stockholders receive an annual dividend of 6%. Now we know that the stock in the Federal Reserve was originally issued to the largest banks in The United States, but because of mergers and acquisitions through the years, you can't actually trace who owns the stock in the Federal Reserve. That's a very closely guarded secret. My guess would be that the owners are those primary dealers, the banks that get to make a profit by selling part of our national debt, those bonds, to the Federal Reserve who buys them with a check for nothing. Then we pay tax to pay the principal and the interest on those bonds so that the Federal Reserve can pay the banks a 6% dividend. Don't be alarmed if you don't quite comprehend the deception of this system at first glance. Very few people do. It is purposely complex. The economist John Maynard Keynes once wrote, by this means government may secretly and unobserved confiscate the wealth of the people and not one man in a million will detect the theft. I believe that presented correctly anyone can understand this system regardless of how complex it is. So let's do a recap and break it down even more. The way the system works is that step one, The government creates glorified IOUs. These bonds increase our national debt and put the public on the hook to pay it back. Step two: IOUs are swapped to create currency. The Treasury sells the bonds to the banks. The banks then turn around and sell our national debt at a profit to the Federal Reserve which they probably own. The Federal Reserve then opens its checkbook that doesn't have a penny in it and buys those IOUs with IOUs that it writes checks on a checking account that has a zero balance. Then they give those checks to the banks and currency just springs into existence and then the whole process repeats. This results in a buildup of bonds at the Fed Reserve and currency at the Treasury which is really just a supply of numbers. The Treasury then deposits the numbers in the various branches of the government and we get to step three: the government spends the numbers on promises, public works, social programs and war then the government employees contractors and soldiers deposit their pay into the banks and we get to step four where the banks multiply the numbers by magically inventing more IOUs through fractional reserve lending where they steal a portion of everyone's deposit and lend it out. That currency gets redeposited and then a portion is stolen again and the process repeats over and over magnifying the currency supply exponentially. Then we work for some of those numbers which brings us to step five where our numbers are taxed. We pay tax to the IRS who then turns our numbers over to the Treasury so the Treasury can pay the principal plus the interest on bonds that were purchased by the Federal Reserve with a check from nothing. Then we get to step six: the debt ceiling delusion. The system is designed to require ever increasing levels of debt and will eventually collapse under its own weight because politicians always kick the can down the road. They don't want it to collapse on their watch. And finally, step seven, the secret owners take their cut. The world's largest banks own the Federal Reserve. Those banks make a profit selling our national debt to the Fed, they make a profit when the Fed pays them interest on the reserves held at the Fed, and the Fed pays them a 6% dividend on their ownership of the Fed. This system is fundamentally evil. It funnels wealth from the working population to the government and the banking sector. It is the cause of the artificial booms and busts of modern economies and it causes great disparity of wealth between the rich and the working class. And it is only possible because we no longer use real money, we use currency. But worst of all, it is a form of enslavement. Bond is the root word of bondage. Whenever a government issues a bond, it is a promise to make us pay tax in the future. Nobody asked you if you wanted to pay tax today for the prosperity we all enjoyed in the last century nobody is asking our children if they want to work hard in the future to pay for the prosperity we're enjoying now George Washington once wrote to James Madison no generation has the right to contract debts greater than can be paid off during the course of its own existence by stealing prosperity from tomorrow so we can spend it today we enslave ourselves and future generations now this all sounds pretty bad but there is great hope for you are the greatest threat to this false monetary system this system relies on the public being ignorant of its workings please share this knowledge with everyone you know because an informed public that fully understands the system can build a better future for generations to come. And now I leave you with this quote widely attributed to a former director of the Bank of England. The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money and control credit, and with the flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. But if you want to continue as the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and to control credit this is the Federal Reserve in Washington DC it's located on Constitution Street and that is just as much of a joke as the New York Fed being located on Liberty Street. Both of them are unconstitutional, both of them limit our liberty and they transfer wealth away from us every second of every day to the Federal Reserve, to the government, and to the banking sector. You are now among the one in a million who can detect the theft of your prosperity. So the big question is, what can you do about it? One, watch this video until you can describe and teach it to others. Those who understand this system can make preparations for its unavoidable collapse and protect themselves. History shows that those who don't will probably be wiped out. Two, share this video with everyone, especially those you care about. All it takes is a mouse click or two to get this message in front of millions. Post this video on Facebook, tweet it, email it to loved ones. Please share it wherever you can. Three, join the conversation. The current world monetary system is based on a three hundred year old design meant to enrich a few at the expense of the many. There must be a better way. At hiddensecretsofmoney.com, we've created an open source platform for the design and development of a new world monetary system. We're calling on every economist, every student, every college, every bright mind, and anyone who cares to join the discussion. In educating ourselves and each other, we can prevent the further loss of our freedoms and maybe, just maybe, win some of them back.

@Juliesnark1731 - 🇺🇸🍩 JULIE DONUTS 🇺🇸🍩

H/T @GoodLionTV for the video out of his amazing film “The Greatest Show on Earth” GO WATCH THAT TOO!!

Saved - August 10, 2025 at 10:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently discovered that Palantir Technologies originated from a CIA-backed initiative aimed at expanding mass surveillance. Initially created to privatize the Total Information Awareness program, Palantir has grown under heavy CIA influence, acting as a front company. Its technology impacts national security globally, targeting dissidents and shaping military strategies. During Operation Warp Speed, Palantir played a key role in vaccine distribution and public health responses. This raises serious concerns about privacy and control over our data and freedom. It's crucial to question their influence and spread awareness.

@SwampyUniparty - SwampyUniparty

Palantir: A Global Surveillance Giant w/ Deep Ties to the CIA and Governments Worldwide Did you know that Palantir Technologies, the company behind predictive policing and pre-crime programs, was essentially born from a CIA-backed initiative to expand mass surveillance? Here's the shocking truth: Origins in Surveillance: Palantir was created to privatize and supercharge the Total Information Awareness (TIA) program, which Congress shut down due to its blatant invasion of privacy. But as a private entity, Palantir sidestepped those restrictions and expanded its reach under heavy CIA influence. CIA's Pet Project: The CIA wasn't just an investor; it was Palantir's earliest funder, first client, and provided ongoing guidance at its headquarters. This isn't just business—it's a full-on CIA front company, despite Peter Thiel's later jokes about the reverse. Beyond Borders: Palantir's tech isn't just for the U.S. It's shaping national security states globally, attending Bilderberg conferences, and targeting dissidents. Think of it as a "globalist digital world brain" controlling everything from military strategies to corporate decisions. Public Health Weaponized: Remember Operation Warp Speed? Palantir was right there, distributing vaccines and partnering with HHS and CDC. Their predictive tools are now being used to preemptively declare pandemics and control public health responses. Your Privacy at Stake: From predictive policing that labels individuals as future criminals to pre-crime programs that decide your fate before you act, Palantir's influence is everywhere. And it's not just about safety—it's about control. Question Everything: If Palantir can shape governments, target dissidents, and control public health, what's next? Your data, your freedom, your future could all be on the line. Spread the word. The more people know, the harder it is for them to operate in the shadows. P.S. I learned all of this from @_whitneywebb...you should follow her. Video from @5149jamesli P.P.S. Grok helped write this...Grok is intertwined with Palantir. I figured if there was anything unfair, Grok would call it out, but it didn't 🤷‍♂️

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Are we just becoming China? Is that the plan here, just mass surveillance on everybody? Because recently, I was just in China, and some of what I saw was pretty good. We're talking about the creation of a biometric surveillance state with predictive algorithms. A new report shines light on contracts with tech company Palantir which would create data profiles of Americans to surveil and harass them. 'Palantir is here to disrupt and make our the institutions we partner with the very best in the world and when it's necessary to scare enemies and on occasion kill them.' 'Except here, the enemy is literally the American people. I tweeted this out the other day saying that it should be very alarming that the same company that's tracking terrorists abroad is now tracking us at home. Starting to feel like maybe they think we're the enemy. What are your thoughts?'"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are we just becoming China? Is that the plan here, just mass surveillance on everybody? Because recently, I was just in China, and some of what I saw was pretty good. Speaker 1: Some, not Speaker 0: so good. Okay this is where we're headed except without the nice trains and without the free healthcare. We're talking about the creation of a biometric surveillance state with predictive algorithms. A new report shines light on contracts with tech company Palantir which would create data profiles of Americans to surveil and harass them. Speaker 1: We're doing it. We're doing it. And I'm sure you're enjoying this as much as I am. Let's not talk to analysts about the burden of being right. Our burdens of investing in ontology, our burdens of actually looking at the math. Palantir is here to disrupt and make our the institutions we partner with the very best in the world and when it's necessary to scare enemies and on occasion kill them. Speaker 0: Except here, the enemy is literally the American people. I tweeted this out the other day saying that it should be very alarming that the same company that's tracking terrorists abroad is now tracking us at home. Starting to feel like maybe they think we're the enemy. What are your thoughts?
Saved - July 29, 2025 at 8:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the funding history of Jubilee, a popular political YouTube channel, revealing its financial backers. Initially funded by Civic Accelerator in 2013, Jubilee later received significant investments from notable figures like Steve Chen and other Asian entrepreneurs, totaling at least $3.25 million by 2022. I also discussed the Weimar Republic's societal issues, including rampant debauchery and the influence of Jewish individuals in various sectors. This context highlights the complex interplay of funding, media influence, and historical narratives.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵/6 To understand the bias of an organization you simply need to know who funds it Jubilee is undoubtedly one of the most popular political YouTube pages on the web today ...and people don't realize some of the richest men in the world fund it Here is who funds Jubilee:

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Jubilee received it's first round of funding in August of 2013 for $50K from a tech incubator called Civic Accelerator Of the funding Jubilee's received $50k is minuscule & Civic Accelerator isn't tied to anyone too special ...much unlike Jubilee's next round of funding

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Jubilee's next funding round was in December of 2017 for a much larger $655,000 And the big name funding this round was a member of Elon Musk's & Peter Thiel's infamous PayPal Mafia One of the co-founders of the very YouTube platform Jubliee posts its videos to: Steve Chen

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

But Jubilee’s funding didn't stop in 2017… Their next round of funding came in September of 2022 and was for $1.1 million And the cast of donors for this round was a star-studded lineup of Asian entrepreneurs: In addition to Steve Chen again, this round featured: -Patreon Co-Founder Sam Yam -DoorDash Co-Founder Stanley Tang -Rotten Tomatoes Founder Patrick Lee -Triller CEO Mike Lu -Former NBA player Jeremy Lin

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Also, despite tracking all this funding by 2022 Jubilee had received at least $3.25 million in funding (see news article) That means there is still around $1.45 million I was unable to account for And it also means Jubilee's probably received much more money since then... https://t.co/OroFG7Sohc

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Thanks for checking out my thread 🙏 If you'd like to view more of my threads I've linked a few of them below The Terrible Things Israel Has Done To The US: https://t.co/gWWMEoYkE8 The Untold Side Of The Weimar Republic https://t.co/Q8HPjr0oJ3

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵The terrible things Israel has done to the US are unparalleled From assassinating US presidents and stealing nukes to murdering US soldiers and a role in 9/11 This thread will expose key Israeli treacheries of the US ...and show our "greatest ally" is really our worst enemy

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

We’re often told Western societies are experiencing conditions reminiscent of the German Weimar Republic. But what exactly was the German Weimar Republic? I’d like to explain the republic…and its incredible levels of debauchery, meaninglessness, sex, drugs, and—of course—Jews. “The decay of moral values in all areas of life—the period of deepest German degradation—coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany.” -Karl Wiehe Background The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name—that was popularized by Adolf Hitler—of the German nation-state that existed from November of 1918 to March of 1933. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany where the constitutional assembly that established the new German republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany’s loss in WWI. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept “full responsibility” for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point 40% of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain and in one two-year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of WWI. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around 160 German Marks at the end of 1922, cost 200,000,000,000 German Marks by late 1923. The German peoples’ life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,210,500,000,000 German Marks by November of 1923, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Sex and Drugs Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn’t explicitly legal but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution was lax to non-existent. On any given night up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available: midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposefully tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid-scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes. Interracial, inter-generational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red-light district—but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, “most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” There were homosexual, lesbian, and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren’t isolated or rare one-off outliers either, there were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death, or even—in some instances—to death were performed in Weimar Germany (called Lustmord). As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my writings because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up yourself. German Newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictional accounts of murders sold very well on German book stands. Serial Killers had a romanticized lore around them, similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to non-existent. Images could be purchased under-the-counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest movie stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong-willed independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross-dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin’s women began to question the need for a man in their lives at all and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium (a predecessor to heroin), morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for “scientific” sexual purposes. One of the chief “scientists” behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirshfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statue of German Law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld’s crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July of 1919 when he opened The Institute of Sexual Research (Institut für Sexualwissenschaft) in Berlin. The institute’s stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences…and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary (aka genders) and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed sex re-assignment surgery. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual, and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual-specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public, which was reported to have been visited by school classes. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said: “I saw pimps offering anything to anybody: little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisson of all—as it allowed you to enjoy sod*my, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke.” A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, Music, and Film Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish-influenced anti-authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risqué and homosexual films. The world’s first known homosexual film—Anders als die Andern (1919)—came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. This film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film called Mädchen in Uniform (1931) is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on-screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions (no matter how crude those emotions may be) rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wiene. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis’ content is emblematic of the anti-authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Erich Pommer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti-authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society, instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti-bourgeois protest in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far-right figures, including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as “the first official lesbian of Berlin” named Claire Waldoff. Waldoff dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldoff succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars in the world, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlene credits Clarie Waldoff as “introducing her to lesbian love”. Marlene Deitrich was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Dietrich “perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin.” Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like, suicide, morphiem, and mad house. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal… Architecture One aesthetic element that I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic—called expressionist architecture—also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on “distortion of form to create an emotional effect”. This is architecture that’s generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I’d also argue there’s a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society’s more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti-authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Taut and Erich Mendelsohn. Jews One of the key factors in Hitler’s rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this article would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or—possibly more importantly—the German public’s perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over-representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% (.09%) of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In my opinion, these figures are staggering primarily because of the Jews’ immense over-representation in major positions of power within German society. Politics • The author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. • One quarter of the members of the 8-person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews (Otto Landesberg and Hugo Haase). • The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. • The SPD (Social Democratic Party of Germany) was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 22% of the entirety of the SPD were Jews. • The SPD’s main political theorist was a Jew: Eduard Bernstein • Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews: Ferdinand Lassalle, Leopold Sonnemann. • SPD's “foremost theoretician of this century” was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. • SPD Key Figure, industrialist, and political thinker Walther Rathenau was a Jew. • The Vice President of the Berlin Police was the jew Bernhard Weiss. • In the first Weimar administration Vice Chancellor Eugen Schiffer was Jewish as was Weimar Interior Minister Erich Koch-Weser. • 15% of the members of the Reichstag (German Parliament) were Jewish. • A large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews: Rosa Luxemburg, Paul Levi, Ernst Toller, Erich Muhsam, Gustav Landauer, Eugen Levine, and Karl Radek. The Press • The Ullstein Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew Leopold Ullstein. • The Berliner Iliustrirte Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was Published by the Ullstein Press and its chief editor was the Jew Kurt Korff. • The Vossische Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Ullstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew Georg Bernhard. • Another of the othe r largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Mosse. • The Berliner Tageblatt was the largest of Rudolf Mosse’s newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff • Editor-in-chief of the SPD’s party paper Vorwärts was the Jew Friedrich Stampfer The Arts • The Jew Erich Pommer was a German-born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, “Pommer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the 1920s and early 1930s.” • In 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. • Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era—the German expressionist movement—were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wiene. • Two of the key Architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Taut and Erich Mendelsohn. • Some of the most influential producers, directors, & actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well to name a few: Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Josef Von Sternberg, Fritz Kohn, Otto Wallburg, Peter Lowenstein. • To conclude the arts, some claim the anti-authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. Sex • Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed "the Einstein of Sex". He was president of World League of Sexual Reform and of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. • Ivan Bloch was Jewish and is often called the "first Sexologist". • As quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, “most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” Other notable Jewish over-representations: (**Please Note** these next five bullet points are not official numbers and are from a NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including them because although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public’s perception of Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society): • 56% of notaries were Jews. • 52% of doctors were Jews. • 45% of Hospital Directors were Jews. • 48% of lawyers were Jews. • 35% of dentists were Jews. One last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. I included a link with more detail below, but many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it’s somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I list is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non-prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the provided list, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish over-representation is even more substantial when you consider that many of these Jewish amalgamations of over-representation occurred within many of Germany’s most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the "Juden Republic" (Jew's Republic) by Germans. I think it's easy to see why... Enter the National Socialists After Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the Brownshirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld’s books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: • Writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus, destroy the principles of race and Volk. • Pornography and explicit literature. • Pacifist literature. • All books degrading German purity. • Literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field. • Popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner, based on a bourgeois or upper class view of life. • The works of traitors, emigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. • The literature of Marxism, Communism and Bolshevism. • Literature with liberal, democratic tendencies and attitudes, and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. • Books that advocate "art" which is decadent, bloodless, or purely constructivist. • The decadent, destructive and Volk-damaging writings of "Asphalt and Civilization" literati • Patriotic kitsch in literature. • All historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk, or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk, or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses, and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city and National Socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest—as they say—is history. (Sources and further reading in the comments below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Weimar Republic, established after Germany's WWI loss and burdened by massive debt, faced economic devastation, hyperinflation, and high suicide rates. Berlin became a hub for prostitution, with up to 100,000 prostitutes nightly, including child prostitutes advertised in newspapers. Homosexual, lesbian, and transsexual bars thrived, alongside a booming porn industry. Drug use was rampant, with cocaine readily available. Magnus Hirschfeld, a homosexual Jew, founded the Institute of Sexual Research, which developed a system categorizing 64 genders and coining "transvestite" and "transsexual." Art, music, and film were overtaken by sexual themes and anti-authoritarianism. Jews were perceived as overrepresented in politics, the press, the arts, and the sex industry, despite comprising less than 1% of the population. The Weimar Republic was often called the "Juden Republic." After Hitler's rise, homosexual bars were shut down, and Hirschfeld's institute was pillaged, with his books among the first burned by the National Socialists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The decay of moral values in all areas of life, the period of deepest German degradation coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany. The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name that was popularized by Adolf Hitler of the German nation state that existed from November March 1933. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany, where the constitutional assembly that established the new German Republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany's loss in World War I. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept full responsibility for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point, forty percent of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain. And in one two year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of World War one. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around a 160 German marks at the 1922 cost 200,000,000,000 German marks by late nineteen twenty three. The German people's life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,200,000,000,000.0 German marks by November 1923, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of the primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn't explicitly legal, but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution were lax to nonexistent. On any given night, up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available. Midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposely tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes, Interracial, intergenerational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red light district, but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts, were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. There were homosexual, lesbian and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren't isolated or rare one off outliers either. There were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death or even, in some instances, to death were performed in Weimar, Germany, called Lustmord. As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my videos because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up for yourself. German newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictionalized accounts of murders sold very well on German bookstands. Serial killers had a romanticized lore around them, very similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to nonexistent. Images could be purchased under the counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report, there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong willed, independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin's women began to question the need for a man in their lives and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant, and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for scientific sexual purposes. One of the chief scientists behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirschfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statute of German law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld's crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July 1919 when he opened the Institute of Sexual Research in Berlin. The institute's stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary aka genders and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed one of the first sex reassignment surgeries. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public which was reported to have been visited by schoolchildren. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said, quote, I saw pimps offering anything to anybody. Little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisgin of all, as it allowed you to enjoy sodomy, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke. End quote. A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin, and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish influenced anti authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risque and homosexual films. The world's first known homosexual film, Ander's Al's Die Andern came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story of a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. The film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film, called Machen in Uniform, is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions, no matter how crude those emotions may be, rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German Expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis' content is emblematic of the anti authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed by the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Eric Palmer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti bourgeoisie protests in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far right figures including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as the first official lesbian of Berlin named Claire Waldof. Waldof dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldorf succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars of the day, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlena credits Claire Waldoff as introducing her to lesbian love. Marlena was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Marlena perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin. Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like Suicide, Morphium and Madhouse. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal. One aesthetic element I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic, called expressionist architecture, also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on, quote, distortion of form to create an emotional effect. This architecture is generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I'd also argue there's a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society's more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. One of the key factors in Hitler's rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this video would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or possibly more importantly, the German public's perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In politics, the author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. One quarter of the members of the eight person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews, Otto Landsberg and Hugo House. The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. The S. P. D. Or Social Democratic Party of Germany was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 22% of the entirety of the S. P. D. Were Jews. The SPD's main political theorist was a Jew, Edward Bernstein. Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews, Ferdinand LaSalle and Leopold Sonneman. SPD's foremost theoretician of this century was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. SPD key figure, industrialist and political thinker Walter Rathenau was a Jew. The vice president of the Berlin Police was the Jew Bernhard Weiss. In the first Weimar administration, Vice Chancellor Eugene Schiffer was Jewish, as was Weimar Interior Minister, Eric Koch Wesser. 15% of the members of the Reichstag, or the German Parliament, were Jewish. In addition to all this, a large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews. To name a few: Rosa Luxembourg, Paul Levy, Ernst Toller, Eric Musam, Gustav Landauer, Eugene Levine and Karl Radick. In the press, the Osteen Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew, Osteen. The Berliner Allostriete Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was published by the Olstein press and its chief editor was the Jew, Kurt Korf. The Waushicher Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Olstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew George Bernhard. One of the other largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Maas. The Berliner Taggeblat was the largest of Rudolf Maas's newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff. Editor in chief of the SPD's party paper Vorwarts, was the Jew Friedrich Stamper. In the arts, the Jew Eric Palmer was a German born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, quote, Palmer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the nineteen twenties and early nineteen thirties. In 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era, the German expressionist movement, were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. Some of the most influential producers, directors and actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well. To name a few, Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Joseph von Sternberg, Fritz Koen, Otto Wallberg, and Peter Lowenstein. To conclude the arts, some claim the anti authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist students. In the sex industry, Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed the Einstein of sex. He was president of the World League of Sexual Reform and, of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. Ivan Block was Jewish and is often called the first sexologist. And finally, as quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. A quick note on these next five points. These are not official numbers and are from an NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including these numbers because, although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public's perception of the Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society. 56% of notaries were Jews. 52% of doctors were Jews. 45% of hospital directors were Jews. 48% of lawyers were Jews. And 35% of dentists were Jews. And finally, one last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. Many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when Gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it's somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I listed is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the list provided, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish overrepresentation is even more substantial when you consider that many of the Jewish amalgamations of overrepresentation occurred within many of Germany's most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the Juden Republic or the Jews Republic by Germans. I think it's easy to see why. After Hitler's rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the brown shirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld's books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Social Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus destroy the principles of race in bulk. Pornography and explicit literature, pacifist literature, all books degrading German purity, literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field, popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner based on a bourgeoisie or upper class view of life. The works of traders, immigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. The literature of Marxism, communism and Bolshevism. Literature with liberal democratic tendencies and attitudes and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. And finally, all historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city, and national socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest, as they say, is history.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Also, I have a much longer thread that goes in to Jubilee's history, employees and biases much more in-depth You can check it out here: https://t.co/jLRzuyoVHo

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵Jubilee Media is everywhere... From 1 vs 20 debates to real-life dating app "swiping" You've surely seen their videos But this thread will show Jubilee isn't just some YouTube page that hit it big It's a political apparatus funded by some of the world's most powerful men…

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

@Agent_Gray77 Thanks Alex 👍👍 Really appreciate it

Saved - August 13, 2025 at 11:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1910, six influential men, including Senator Nelson Aldrich and banker Paul Warburg, secretly met on Jekyll Island to address America's unstable banking system. They drafted a blueprint for a national reserve system, leading to the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. This institution regulates interest rates, oversees banks, and manages the currency supply. Its public-private hybrid structure remains debated, as it executes policies conceived in secrecy, impacting the economy and individual finances today.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

In 1910, the 6 most powerful men in America vanished. They boarded a private train using fake names & disappeared to a remote island. What they created in total secrecy now controls $30.5 trillion in U.S. money. Here's what happened in that secret meeting held on Jekyll Island:

@jgreyfriend - Grey

Between 1800 & 1910, America’s banking system was broken: • The U.S. had no central authority over currency • Over 30,000 types of banknotes were in circulation • Banks failed regularly (major panics in 1873, 1893, 1907) • No lender of last resort meant a single rumor could cause a bank run Wall Street was vulnerable. The public had lost trust. A system reboot was needed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Before the Civil War, the U.S. banking system was a jumble of local banks, local currencies, and conflicting regulations. Traveling from state to state meant converting cash to local money. This confusion made Americans feel they were not part of a truly unified nation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the decades before the Civil War, the country's banking system was a jumble of local banks, local currency, and conflicting regulations. If you traveled from state to state, you would need to convert your cash to local money. All this confusion helped make Americans feel like they weren't part of a truly unified nation.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

A “duck hunting trip” was planned. In November 1910, Senator Nelson Aldrich, head of the National Monetary Commission, arranged a meeting. But it wasn’t in Washington. It was on Jekyll Island, Georgia, owned by J.P. Morgan and other elites. Aldrich gathered 5 men. All boarded a private train using fake names.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A series of financial panics culminating in the panic of nineteen o seven prompted Congress to reform the nation's monetary system. Congress passed the Aldrich Vreeland Act in 1908, establishing an 18-member national monetary commission chaired by Rhode Island Senator Nelson Aldrich. The commission was charged with reforming the monetary system, but by 1910 progress stalled and it could not agree on a plan. Aldrich took matters into his own hands, meeting with bankers on Jekyll Island to formulate a plan. The group included Paul Warburg, Henry Davidson, and Frank Vanderlip; also present were Aldrich's secretary Arthur Shelton and A. Piet Andrew, a treasury official. Warburg's attendance was critical because of his knowledge of European banking practices. Aldrich was aware that meeting with bankers outside the commission would generate controversy, hence the remote Jekyll Island location.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A series of financial panics culminating in the panic of nineteen o seven prompted Congress to undertake a series of steps toward reforming the nation's monetary system to promote macroeconomic stabilization. Congress passed the Aldrich Vreeland Act in 1908, establishing an 18 member national monetary commission chaired by Rhode Island Senator Nelson Aldrich. The commission was charged with finding a way to reform the nation's monetary system, but progress was slow and by 1910, the commission could not agree on a plan. Aldrich took matters into his own hands, meeting with a group of bankers on Jekyll to formulate a plan. The group included bankers Paul Warburg, Henry Davidson, and Frank Vanderlip. Also present were Aldrich's secretary, Arthur Shelton, and a. Piet Andrew, a treasury official. Warburg's attendance was critical because of his knowledge of European banking practices. Aldrich was well aware that his meeting with bankers outside of the commission proceedings would generate controversy, which is why the group met at the remote Jekyll Island location.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

Who were the 6 men? They represented nearly 25% of global wealth at the time: • Nelson Aldrich – Senator, father-in-law to John D. Rockefeller Jr. • Paul Warburg – Partner at Kuhn, Loeb & Co., key architect • Frank Vanderlip – President of National City Bank (Citibank) • Henry Davison – Senior partner at J.P. Morgan • Charles Norton – President of First National Bank of NY • Benjamin Strong – Future head of the Federal Reserve Bank of NY This wasn’t a random group. It was the money trust.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

Why the secrecy? Because if the public knew private bankers were designing a central bank, it would’ve been political suicide. "We were as secretive as conspirators... we knew that what we were about to do would be criticized." – Frank Vanderlip So they used first names only. Staff were dismissed. No press allowed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
JPMorgan. In 1910, Morgan devised another secretive plot, one that would also involve the most powerful bankers at the time, but was even more consequential, one that inspired the very book mister Griffin authored. "This is what they had planned." It was done in the privacy of a private club, an island in Georgia called Jekyll Island, which is why I titled the book The Creature from Jekyll Island. Morgan invited them to a secret meeting on his private island, instructing them to disguise themselves as duck hunters and only use their first names. "These bankers were worth over one fourth of the entire world's wealth." They rode the whole way there with blinds down, headed for a private club on a small island off the coast of Georgia, the infamous place named Jekyll Island. "The meeting that took place there was shrouded in mystery."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: JPMorgan. In 1910, Morgan devised another secretive plot, one that would also involve the most powerful bankers at the time, but was even more consequential, one that inspired the very book mister Griffin authored. Speaker 1: This is what they had planned. It was done in the privacy of a private club, an island in Georgia called Jekyll Island, which is why I titled the book The Creature from Jekyll Island. Speaker 0: Morgan invited them to a secret meeting on his private island, instructing them to disguise themselves as duck hunters and only use their first names. These bankers were worth over one fourth of the entire world's wealth. They rode the whole way there with blinds down, headed for a private club on a small island off the coast of Georgia, the infamous place named Jekyll Island. The meeting that took place there was shrouded in mystery.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

What did they actually create? In 9 days on Jekyll Island, they drafted a blueprint: • A national reserve system • 15 regional Reserve Banks • A central governing board • Ability to expand/contract currency supply • Privately owned but federally supervised It wasn’t called a “central bank”, too controversial. Instead: The Federal Reserve System.

Video Transcript AI Summary
What emerged from the Jekyll meeting was the so called Aldrich plan presented to the National Monetary Commission as a legislative blueprint. It became a catalyst for debate about the role of the government in banking and the central bank's governance. Representing a departure from the centralized governments of European central banks, the plan proposed that a National Reserve Association would function as the US Central Bank. The association would consist of a federation of 15 regional bank associations, each to be presided over by boards of directors elected by the local banks. Aldrich's proposed central bank would promote economic stability by providing for greater financial stability. Though the bill Aldrich put forward to the US Senate in January 1912 was not acted on, Many of the proposals that came out of the Jekyll meeting remained at the core of the subsequent steps in the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What emerged from the Jekyll meeting was the so called Aldrich plan presented to the National Monetary Commission as a legislative blueprint. It became a catalyst for debate about the role of the government in banking and the central bank's governance. Representing a departure from the centralized governments of European central banks, the plan proposed that a National Reserve Association would function as the US Central Bank. The association would consist of a federation of 15 regional bank associations, each to be presided over by boards of directors elected by the local banks. Aldrich's proposed central bank would promote economic stability by providing for greater financial stability. Though the bill Aldrich put forward to the US Senate in January 1912 was not acted on, Many of the proposals that came out of the Jekyll meeting remained at the core of the subsequent steps in the creation of the Federal Reserve.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

From secret draft to national law The plan, dubbed the Aldrich Plan, was introduced to Congress. At first, it failed. But in 1913, with Woodrow Wilson in office and after political tweaks, it passed as the Federal Reserve Act. The Fed was born, and the public had no idea how.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

Before the Fed, America was like this: • Each bank issued its own paper money • Credit was local, fragmented, and unreliable • Interest rates fluctuated wildly • Seasonal demand (like harvest season) caused cash shortages • Bank runs were common and devastating Result: Economic growth was unstable and full of panic.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

So what does the Fed do? Today, the Federal Reserve: • Controls interest rates • Regulates banks • Prints (and retracts) U.S. dollars • Acts as lender of last resort • Backs over $20 trillion in money, credit, and liquidity It is the most powerful financial institution in the U.S. and possibly the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Federal Reserve is the central bank of The United States and even though it acts as an independent agency, it's still part of the federal government. Some people call it the bank for banks. Their goal is to encourage high employment and economic growth while also keeping inflation under control. To accomplish this outcome, the Fed has a number of tools it can use, but one key tool is the control over interest rates, which is the cost of borrowing money. When the Fed raises or lowers interest rate for banks, the rate banks charge consumers for everything including credit cards, auto loans, and home mortgages are affected. If growth is too fast and inflation goes up, the Fed can increase rates so growth can be slowed and stabilized. These decisions, along with other policy choices, are made by 12 leaders within the Fed called the Federal Open Market Committee.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may have heard of the Federal Reserve or the Fed. But what is it? And how does it affect you? The Federal Reserve is the central bank of The United States and even though it acts as an independent agency, it's still part of the federal government. Some people call it the bank for banks. Their goal is to encourage high employment and economic growth while also keeping inflation under control. To accomplish this outcome, the Fed has a number of tools it can use, but one key tool is the control over interest rates, which is the cost of borrowing money. The same way people borrow money from banks, banks need to borrow money from somewhere as well. That's where the Fed comes in. And when the banks borrow money from the Fed, the Fed gets to decide what interest rate banks will pay on their loans. When the Fed raises or lowers interest rate for banks, the rate that banks charge consumers for everything including credit cards, auto loans, and home mortgages are affected. But how does this impact the economy? If the economy is not doing well, the Fed will likely lower interest rates to encourage business expansion and increase consumer spending, which can help kick start a sluggish economy. And if an economy is growing too fast and inflation goes up, the Fed can increase rates so growth can be slowed and stabilized. These decisions, along with other policy choices, are made by 12 leaders within the Fed called the Federal Open Market Committee. The Federal Open Market Committee is made up of the Fed Chairman, who is appointed by the President, the Fed Board of Governors, and a rotating group of regional Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The decisions made at the Fed are largely isolated from political pressure because one, members of the Board of Governors serve fixed terms, two, the Fed is not held hostage by congressional funding. And three, the authority given to the President of The United States to remove a member from office for just cause has rarely been used. The Federal Reserve plays a major role in The US and understanding how it operates can be beneficial when trying to understand broader economic policy.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

But is it truly public? Or private? This is still debated. • The Fed is a public-private hybrid • Regional Fed banks are privately owned by commercial banks • But the Fed Chair is appointed by the President • Congress provides oversight but cannot dictate policy That hybrid structure began on Jekyll Island.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Who owns the Federal Reserve? The speaker says there are banks that own the 12 district Federal Reserve banks, "owned by banks in the sense that they get paid a dividend from what the district banks make up 6%." And then whatever money the bank has, if it's a district bank, whether it be San Francisco or Dallas or Atlanta, then they have to pay the operating costs to operate an individual district bank. "And after that, every single penny that is remaining is remitted to the US Treasury." That is why my email address ended in dot o r g, not dot com because we were a quasi private public enterprise. Jay Powell's email address ends in dot gov. "The Federal Reserve Board in Washington DC is a bonafide formal federal agency that is not owned by the banks."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who owns the Federal Reserve? Who are the main shareholders? When I worked at the Dallas Federal Reserve, my email address ended in dot o r g. There are there are banks that own the 12 district Federal Reserve banks, are owned by banks in the sense that they get paid a dividend from what the district banks make up 6%. And then whatever money the bank has, if it's a district bank, whether it be San Francisco or Dallas or Atlanta, then they have to pay the operating costs to operate an individual district bank. And after that, every single penny that is remaining is remitted to the US Treasury. That is why my email address ended in dot o r g, not dot com because we were a quasi private public enterprise. Jay Powell's email address ends in dot gov. The Federal Reserve Board in Washington DC is a bonafide formal federal agency that is not owned by the banks.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

Why this story matters today Every time: • The Fed changes interest rates • Prints emergency stimulus • Bails out a bank • Talks inflation or recession… It’s executing a plan conceived in secrecy by unelected bankers on a private island over a century ago.

@jgreyfriend - Grey

Even in 2025, the banks have total control over your money. That is not only limited to your bank balance but also credit cards. If they want, they can deny you using your credit card for a specific purpose, e.g. paying rent. That's why we built @trykashu so you can turn your credit line into cash. Signup for the waitlist: https://www.kashupay.com/

Kashu | Next-gen finance, in your pocket. The modern way to access your credit. Kashu lets you send, spend, or invest it—just like cash. kashupay.com

@jgreyfriend - Grey

@trykashu I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @Jgreyfriend for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can: https://t.co/xBFJC3q8Jz

@jgreyfriend - Grey

In 1910, the 6 most powerful men in America vanished. They boarded a private train using fake names & disappeared to a remote island. What they created in total secrecy now controls $30.5 trillion in U.S. money. Here's what happened in that secret meeting held on Jekyll Island:

Saved - November 2, 2025 at 12:33 PM

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

THE RING OF POWER: EMPIRE OF THE CITY Full Documentary 2007 This is quite possibly one of the best classic documentaries on the New World Order. You all may have seen clips. Here it is in total, all5 hours. https://t.co/TwjZ4zaMU2

Saved - December 22, 2025 at 11:36 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Why are the tiny British Isles so important to the Global Cult and human control? Watch Part 1 of this 2-part series for free at http://Ickonic.com. Albion - Heart of the World. Fantastic information. https://t.co/ojpF6Mg6M1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ley lines, meridian lines, or dragon lines—the lines of energetic force that interpenetrate and cross planet Earth. Albion, the heart of the world, is awash with them. The point on the global grid where they cross in greatest abundance forms the center of the pattern. They connect standing stone circles, standing stones, ancient earthworks, churches, sacred hills, all located at the power centers where the lines cross. The speaker asks why these islands spawned a global empire—the British Empire—on which it was said that the sun never set, so massive was its scale and breadth that it spanned every time zone where the sun shines. Over thousands of years, a global secret society network of deceit and manipulation—the “global cult”—has been associated with and located in England and the British Isles. This is described as the heart of the global energy pattern, the heart of the world. Control the heart center, and you control the world. The ancients knew about these power centers and their significance through the druids, the priestly class of the Celts, and secret societies like the Knights Templar, which pass on this knowledge through initiations while keeping it overwhelmingly from the general population. The speaker asks: what is it about stone and stones? Ley lines and vortices create a fourth dimensional phenomenon. Nonhuman gods manipulating human society are a fourth dimensional phenomenon. To influence the three-dimensional world from the fourth dimension, they need a dense slow vibration—dense matter—to anchor that fourth dimensional energy in three-dimensional reality. They use crystalline stones overwhelmingly, noting that crystals are used in communication technology. This means that energetically sensitive individuals can tune in through the crystal to information in the ley lines and access knowledge the ancients perceived as the crowned while sitting on an ancient stone in the coronation chair at Westminster Abbey. The reason for the relationship between stones and coronations is suggested to be that stone anchors fourth dimensional entities in three-dimensional reality, which become, in the unseen part of the coronation ritual, the possession by fourth dimensional reptilian gods, with the human level as a vehicle for possession. The world we think we see is different when we consider what we don’t see. Ley lines and power points are part of a vast electrical electromagnetic system. The whole universe is an electrical electromagnetic system. People attend circles like this and see stones, but if they could see beyond visible light into fourth dimensional reality, they would see lines of force and electromagnetic energy forming vortices where they meet. The ancients placed stone circles and standing stones on these points, and pyramids were placed where they are to tap into and harness this electrical system of energy, consciousness, and information. When lines cross and create a vortex, the difference between the third and fourth dimensions thins; the gods can sometimes manifest as astral interferences. Albion’s central importance lies in the nature of the energy passing through the grid, crucial to everyday life. The grid is a fourth dimensional field we can’t see but can feel. London has long attracted secret groups—Knights Templar, the inner core of the Freemasons, Druids—who have known how to tap and harness that power to influence human consciousness, contributing to an empire built from a center in London during which the sun never set. If the strands are pulled together, a stream of ancient knowledge from Babylon through Rome and into the British Isles emerges, known by this secret network. What’s happening now is that the general population is beginning to uncover what they have known all along, and when the population knows, the game changes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ley lines, meridian lines, or dragon lines, the lines of energetic force which interpenetrate and cross planet Earth. Albion, the heart of the world, is awash with them. The point on the global grid of force lines, energy lines, ley lines, meridian lines, dragon lines, where they cross in greatest abundance to form the center of the pattern. They connect standing stone circles, standing stones, ancient earthworks, churches, sacred hills, all located at the power centers where the lines cross. Why did these islands spawn a global empire, the British Empire, on which it was said that the sun never set so massive was its scale and breadth that it spanned every time zone on which the sun shines. Why through thousands of years of history has the global secret society network of deceit and manipulation that I call the global cult been associated with and located in England and the British Isles. This is the center, the heart of the global energy pattern. This is the heart of the world. Control the heart center, and you control the world. The ancients knew about these power centers and their significance in the form of people like the druids, the priestly class of the Celts, and secret societies like the Knights Templar that pass on this knowledge through initiations, through the generations, while keeping it overwhelmingly from the general population. What is it about stone and stones? These ley lines and vortices which the ley lines crossing create, are a fourth dimensional phenomena. And the nonhuman gods manipulating human society are a fourth dimensional phenomena. And to influence the three d world from the four d world, they need a dense slow vibration, what we call matter, dense matter, in this case, to anchor that fourth dimensional energy in three d reality. And they use crystalline stones overwhelmingly, and note that crystals are used in communication technology. And it means that this energetically sensitive can tune in through the crystal to this information in the ley lines and communicate and access information from what the ancients perceived as the crowned while sitting on an ancient stone in the coronation chair at Westminster Abbey? What on earth could be the reason for that? The relationship with stones and coronations, I suggest, is that stone anchors fourth dimensional entities in three d reality, which therefore become in the unseen part of the coronation ritual. Is the human queen or king being crowned as the monarch, or the ritual obsessed, title obsessed, fourth dimensional reptilian gods for which the human level is merely a vehicle for possession? Possession is another way that fourth dimensional entities can be anchored in three d reality via the body. The world we think we see is so different when you encompass what we don't see. We can see the real meaning of these ley lines and power points. They are part of a vast electrical electromagnetic system. The whole universe is a electrical electromagnetic system. People come to circles like this and they see stones. Okay? But if they could see beyond visible light and into fourth dimensional reality, they would see lines of force, electromagnetic, electrical lines of force coming into these places and creating a vortex as they meet. So this is why the ancients put their stone circles and standing stones upon these points, why the pyramids were placed where they are. It was to tap into and harness this electrical system of electromagnetic energy consciousness information. When these lines cross and create this vortex, the vortex thins out the difference between the third dimension and the fourth dimension. So at these places, it's very much thinner and the gods can not communicate, but often they can manifest because they're much closer to this reality when the vortexes are thrown up. The astral realm is interfering, interacting with this world. We're now closing in on why Albion, heart of the world, is so important and why the nature of the energy passing through the grid is crucial to what happens here in what we call everyday life. The grid is a fourth dimensional field which we can't see, but we can feel. London has a long and extraordinary history and has attracted secret groups and societies for thousands of years to its energy grid in the heart of the world, including the Knights Templar, the inner core of the Freemasons, and the Druids, the priestly class of the Celts, who have all known how to tap and harness that power for their own ends. As London developed, they placed their major religious government and royal buildings and palaces on power points within the grid, and used that power to sow impact on human consciousness via the field that an empire was built from here on which that sun never set. And if you pull all the strands together, what you've got is a stream of knowledge coming ancient world, out of Babylon, and going through Rome and the Roman Empire, coming to settle to a such a large extent in the British Isles. This secret network has known about this knowledge all along. It's known the nature of reality and how we interact with it. It's known the true nature of the British Isles and why they are so important. But what's happening now is we are uncovering for the general population what they've known all along. And when the population know what they know, the game changes.
Saved - February 18, 2026 at 11:01 PM

@Norambu3na - Norambu

✡️ Whoever controls the money controls the world https://t.co/BWG0J7i7LQ

View Full Interactive Feed