reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - July 11, 2023 at 7:08 PM

@nancy_hamm1 - ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธNancy Hamm๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŒŸ

Too funny not to share Unfortunately, itโ€™s all true https://t.co/avlZ86optj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker makes derogatory remarks about the Biden family, accusing them of accepting money from China, engaging in illicit activities, and being involved in corrupt practices. The speaker specifically targets Hunter Biden, calling him a sleazebag who took bribes and filmed explicit content. The transcript ends abruptly after summarizing these allegations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They took some cash from China, then smoked crack with a miner. Joke memories declining The Biden family. Old Hunter is a sleazebag. Took bribes from Chairman Giat. Shot movies of his wiener. The Biden family.
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 11:59 PM

@Leerose1985 - Lee ๐Ÿฆ… ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Okay, but seriously?! https://t.co/pyqCUJmw9Y

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand that there are people who dislike Donald Trump, but can any rational person honestly claim that we are better off today than when he was president? Look at the current state of the world, the economy, and gas prices. If you can honestly say that things are better, then you must be delusional.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I get it. I get that there are people who hate Donald Trump. I get that. Okay. Fine. Fine. But what sane, logical, rational Human being can look around currently at the state of the country. No. Correction. The state of the world. The state of the world. And With a straight face claim that we are better off today than we were with president Trump running this country. What sane human can say this with a straight face? Fine you hate him. Fine. Fine. Fine. Fine. But can you honestly look around today? Look in your wallets. Look around at the state of the world. Look at your gas prices. Look at interest rates. Can you really Sit there and say that. If you can, you need to be committed because you're fucking
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 7:52 PM

@stclairashley - Ashley St. Clair

This will never not be funny https://t.co/c9oAEE3Dzy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Hey, glad to see you guys. You're patriots. Look at this guy, covered in blood. Are you okay? Need medical attention? I'm good, thanks. I got shot in the face with a plastic bullet. Can you leave the senate wing? We will. I'm making sure they respect the place. This is sacred. That's it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Fucking a, man. Glad to see you guys. You guys are fucking patriots. Look at this guy. He's got covered in blood. God bless you. Yes, sir. You good, sir? Do you need medical attention? I'm good. Thank you. Alright. I got shot in the face. I got shot in the face with some kind of plastic bullet. Any chance I could get you guys to leave the senate wing? We will. I I've been making sure they ain't disrespecting the plugs. Okay. Just wanna let you guys know this is, like, the sacredest place. I have
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 10:49 PM

@TakingoutTrash7 - CtrlAltDelete

Hahahaha brilliant ๐Ÿ˜† https://t.co/xIFZXzdHkV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden urges people not to come, but then contradicts himself by saying "come together." The speaker seems to mock Biden's statement by repeating "come" multiple times. The transcript ends with the speaker saying they will come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do not come. Do not come. I'm gonna do it. Come on. You don't come. Joe Biden said come. We must come together. No. No. No. No. I'm gonna come.
Saved - November 29, 2023 at 12:06 PM

@Vision4theBlind - Vision4theBlind

Is this Stephen Colbert? https://t.co/6ccnAFSuZr

@StacySharko2 - StacySharko2.0 โค๏ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโค๏ธ๐Ÿฆˆ

@doqholliday Here's the Kappy clip on Jim Carrey... https://t.co/tusFwLx0EF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jim Carrey called the speaker, who talked to him for over 5 hours. The speaker accuses Jim Carrey of being afraid and not taking meaningful action. The speaker claims to be lying to everyone and calls them cowards, predicting their downfall and death. The speaker believes that anyone involved in harming children will face a death sentence. However, they offer a chance to save their soul, acknowledging that death is inevitable. The speaker addresses the fear of selling one's soul but believes redemption is possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fucking out of Jim Carrey called me up last week. I talked to him for 5 and a half hours. He's, like, begging me to, like, get a deal with q. Like, he's afraid of the fucking brackets. I'm like and it's just, like, yammering on with the crap, but, like, not owning up or doing anything fucking meaningful. Mean me, meanwhile, just lying to everybody. Guys, you are fucking cowards. You're going down. You're gonna fucking die. That's it. You're gonna die. If you ate kids, you're gonna fucking die. You can't get over that shit. That's a death sentence. You cannot fucking live. But what I'll tell you that you can do is possibly save your soul. You can save your soul, and I can help you save your soul. You will fucking die, though, so get over it. I know you all are afraid that you sold your soul, but I think you can get
Saved - January 4, 2024 at 9:59 PM

@SaltyGoat17 - SaltyGoat

@jimmykimmel I'm just gonna leave this little video right here๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿผ https://t.co/QFF5aprj8l

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jimmy Kimmel's friendship with professional chef Adam Perry Lang is being questioned due to Lang's association with Jeffrey Epstein. Lang worked as Epstein's private chef and took trips to Epstein's island. Kimmel even helped Lang start his steakhouse, APL, which closed in January 2022 along with Lang's Napa Valley Steakhouse. While COVID and lockdowns were cited as reasons for the closures, Lang's reputation and Epstein connection likely played a role. Court documents revealed Lang flew with Epstein and traveled to various properties. Their close relationship goes beyond mere acquaintances.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People are also pointing to Kimmel's longtime friendship with a man named Adam Perry Lang, who is a professional chef. And the 2 are so close that they spend Thanksgiving with each other year, and Kimmel even helped Lang start his steakhouse APL in Hollywood just a few blocks from Kimmel studio. Here's a photo of them cooking meats together. Now that restaurant, APL, closed in January of 2022, in addition to Lang's Napa Valley Steakhouse, which also closed around the same time. And publicly, they said that this was all due to the restaurants not being able to bounce back from COVID and the lockdowns. And I'm sure that that was a contributing factor, but the chef's reputation and the restaurant's popularity was a when it came out and it was revealed that Lange not only took trips to Epstein's Island on the plane, but that he was every Epstein's private chef in the early 2000. This was not a man that just hung out in the same circles. No. He was there for years working for Epstein with the clients, with the women that Epstein was trafficking. Eater wrote this in 2019. Barbecue star, Adam Perry Lang confirms that he once worked for Jeffrey Epstein, and then in 2020, there was a podcast episode, new podcast investigation, details at Perry Lang's stint as Jeffrey Epstein's private chef. They said the podcast follows Virginia Roberts Giffey? Every Jew Free. I'm probably butchering her name, but we'll just call her Virginia for now. An Epstein victim attempting to reach Lang who worked as Epstein's private chef in the early 2000. Last Last year, unsealed court documents showed that Lang flew with Epstein in private jets and traveled with the billionaire to various properties in Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Like I said, this is not somebody who ran in the same circles. It was very, very close. It was very in the inner
Saved - January 4, 2024 at 7:06 PM

@_kingbau - KingBau.X

Sue This. ๐Ÿฅฒ๐Ÿ–•๐Ÿพ #JimmyKimmelChallenge https://t.co/N0yrjhDAzk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jimmy Kimmel may potentially face a lawsuit from Aaron Rogers for being mentioned in relation to Epstein's flight log. Rogers suggests that there is a list coming out soon and hopes it won't implicate him. He calls out Kimmel and TMZ, urging them to pay attention. Rogers accuses Hollywood and the mainstream media of being pedophiles until the flight logs are released. He had previously predicted that Kimmel would respond within 46 days, and since he hasn't, Rogers assumes the allegations are true. The transcript also briefly mentions a knockout victory in a MMA fight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jimmy Kimmel looks to potentially sue Aaron Rogers over his mentioning of him being potentially tied to Epstein's flight log. It has something to do with the Epstein list that came out? Feels like Feels like That's supposed to be coming out soon. That's supposed to be coming out soon. Look. This guy has been waiting in his wine cellar. Yeah. I've been waiting in my wine cellar for this time. There's a lot of people, including Jimmy Kimmel, are really hoping that doesn't come out. Please. Alright. And refuses to mention me. Jimmy Kimmel, TMZ. I hope you're paying attention. Alright, Jimmy. For the last 46 days, we've been calling on Hollywood. They're all canceled until they address this. You. Jimmy Kimmel. Jimmy Kimmel. Viral this. Viral this. The mainstream media and asking for answers as to who is on the list. Jimmy Kimmel. So you wanna talk about Kimmel? Jimmy Kimmel? Fuck Jimmy Kimmel. And until they released the flight logs, you, the mainstream media, Hollywood, they're all All pedophiles to me. He did. In the beginning of August, I said Jimmy Kimmel would respond in 46 days. And if he didn't, We would assume it's true. So now we are left to assume that all of this is true. Fuck. Jimmy Kimmel. Which means Yeah. MMA light heavyweight Wait. Go Bauman. I've won. How about this little girl, Carrie? Just the way he threw it up as he gets the knockout victory. Jim Haney,
Saved - January 3, 2024 at 9:44 PM

@DogRightGirl - Spitfire

Why would anyone think Jimmy Kimmel made trips to Epstein Island? https://t.co/RbgkxEUlIs

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks for the listener's opinion on someone, specifically if they find that person attractive or not. They suggest taking another look to form an opinion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What you think of the statute? I mean, do you think that cheese do you think that chick, isn't she? I mean, do you think that she's attracted or not? Just try to see. Mhmm. Take another look at

@lakemonstercl1 - ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธSteve2A๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธGod๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธFamily๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธCountry๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Jimmy Kimmel is a lying POS and most likely a perverted Pedophile. https://t.co/OOvuxyvDxB

Video Transcript AI Summary
My best friend was Jeffrey Epstein's personal chef and went on many trips to the island. If your best friend was named on the Epstein flight logs and was his personal chef, wouldn't you know? It's hard to believe they had no clue. You can tell when something is off just by looking at people's photos on Instagram. It's not difficult. They expect us to believe they had no idea, but that's a lie.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: His best friend. Mhmm. His best friend, was Jeffrey Epstein's personal chef and took many trips to the island. Okay. Here we go. I have not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein. So let me ask you guys this. We all got best friends. If your best friend ended up being named on the Epstein flight logs and they were the Personal chef of Jeffrey Epstein. Are you not gonna know that? Oh, I would know that. Yeah. I I really I really feel like that you may know that if your best friend was the head of a drug cartel, you mean You could tell me that you ain't never had any clin inclination. What's a what's Jimmy doing over there late at night? Why is he coming back with his knuckles bloodied up every single day? What is going on? These people really want us to believe that they just they just don't don't know? I can look at people's photos on Instagram and go, oh, they must have divorced their husband because they're acting kinda crazy right now. Like, you know? Like, that's not what married people do. Like, it's not hard. You wanna tell me that your best friend is the personal chef, the Jeffrey And you had no clue. That's a lie from the pits of hell.
Saved - March 1, 2024 at 5:20 AM

@iamyesyouareno - iamyesyouareno

Imagine that. https://t.co/pcYYucqfD6

Saved - May 29, 2024 at 1:27 PM

@mustkn0w - Knowledge ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Jim Carrey was never the same after thisโ€ฆโ€ฆ https://t.co/oYtHy0te5o

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1989, the US had a shot schedule with twice as many shots as other Western countries. Parents should educate themselves about vaccines and make informed decisions. Some doctors may not prioritize learning about vaccines due to financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. The pharmaceutical industry controls medical education, focusing on vaccines rather than prevention or nutrition. Asking doctors to prioritize children's health over profit is challenging.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back in 1989, the shot schedule was 10 shots given. Ten shots given. When I was a kid, what do we get to? It's twice as many as anywhere else in in 30 countries in the western world. We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that? Then you should educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life? I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time. Parents have to have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. When the other doctors are here and they will be on the other side in a while after you leave Grab them and stab them? You mean? That was right. This is my nickname. Will they say? Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save that could save a life or prevent a disease? I don't I don't know. The AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical schools are financed by the drug companies. This is a huge business. Vaccine vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13,000,000,000 They control medical schools. I mean, they're these doctors are not learning about prevention or vitamins or diet. What we're asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
Saved - June 20, 2024 at 3:21 PM

@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo

DAVE CHAPPELLE KNOWS!!!๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/eZJeS7yi7x

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people wonder why Trump was popular, but I understand because I hear it daily. He's loved in Ohio for being different. In the first debate, he stood out by calling the system rigged, while Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama disagreed. When asked for evidence, Trump admitted to using the system himself. When Clinton criticized his taxes, he cleverly responded that it made him smart and pointed out flaws in the tax code. This moment marked the rise of a new political figure. Translation: Trump's popularity in Ohio stems from his unique approach in debates, where he criticized the system and defended his tax practices against Clinton's attacks. This set him apart as a new political force.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A lot of you don't understand why Trump was so popular, but I I get it because I hear it every day. He's very loved. And the reason he's loved is because people in Ohio have never seen somebody like him. That first debate, I've never seen anything like it. I've never seen a white male billionaire screaming at the top of his lungs. This whole system is ripped, he said. And across the stage was white woman, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama sitting over there looking at him like, no. It's not. I said, now wait a minute, bro. It's what he said. And the moderator said, well, mister Trump, if in fact the system is rigged as you suggest, what would be your evidence? Remember what he said, bro? He said, I know the system is rigged because I use it. I said, god damn. No one ever heard someone say something that true. And then Hillary Clinton tried to punch him in the taxes. She said, this man doesn't pay his taxes. He shot right back. That makes me smart. And then he said, if you want me to pay my taxes, then change your tax code. But I know you won't because your friends and your donors enjoy the same tax breaks that I do. And with that, my friends, the star was born.
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 3:21 AM

@TheFigen_ - Figen

For a moment I thought he was joking. ๐Ÿ˜‚ https://t.co/45pUZrRCD7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Life can be unfair, and you may face challenges that seem undeserved. In those moments, it's crucial to stay determined and keep pushing forward. Never give up, no matter the obstacles you encounter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I wanna take this opportunity to give you some advice. Over the course of your life, you will find that things are not always fair. You will find that things happen to you that you do not deserve and that are not always warranted, but you have to put your head down and fight fight fight. Never ever ever give up.
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 9:27 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Woody Harrelson knew exactly what he was doing when he made this joke on SNL https://t.co/qD9nHJMRMM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Woody Harrelson delivered a monologue on SNL about a movie plot where major drug cartels control the media and politicians, forcing people to stay home unless they take the cartels' drugs repeatedly. He dismissed the script as unbelievable. Following his performance, media outlets launched attacks labeling him an anti-vaxxer and a stoner. His joke about the cartels buying the media was met with a response that seemed to confirm his point, highlighting the irony of the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Woody Harrelson had that monologue on SNL. Speaker 1: So the movie goes like this. The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartels drugs and keep taking them over and over. I threw the script away. I mean, who is gonna believe that crazy idea? Speaker 0: Right after it, the next day, there's all these hit pieces. Call them an anti vaxxer and a stoner. When he makes that joke and he talks about them buying all the media, and then all the media responds as if they've been bought and paid for. That's pretty wild.
Saved - November 14, 2024 at 1:50 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Seriously https://t.co/kxcg2Arf8v

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many artists feel unable to express their political views, particularly regarding support for Trump, fearing backlash. They believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and are concerned about government control over social media. This situation mirrors troubling developments in the UK, where individuals face imprisonment for their online expressions. The potential for censorship is alarming, regardless of political affiliation. Trump emphasizes the importance of free speech and advocates against government influence on public discourse. This principle, which aligns with the First Amendment, should be a fundamental aspect of society but is often treated as revolutionary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Out there. There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind. Do you know many artists that have reached out to me that are, like, fucking hippies, man? Like like, artists, like, musicians, comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they can't do it. They said they want to, but they don't wanna be attacked. They can't say it. They think the country is going in the wrong direction. They think that this control of social media by the government, which we would have had pretty much fully if it wasn't for Elon buying Twitter Mhmm. That this is a dangerous precedent to set, whether it's a right wing government or a left wing government. And that what you see that's happening in the UK where people are being imprisoned for tweets and Facebook posts. Yeah. In in the in the UK is the part that's mind bending about it too. Mind bending. The whole thing is nuts, and it's a dangerous path that we were on. We were on that path. Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for, and that this censoring of information needs to stop, and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to say. Yeah. Look. I I That alone. That's that's, that shouldn't be as revolutionary as it is. I know. It should be a core tenant of what I mean, it's essentially the first amendment. You know what I
Saved - November 27, 2024 at 9:10 PM

@Yummy_yvy - Yvonne

This is hilarious and totally accurate ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ https://t.co/AofpA4Msvd

Saved - December 14, 2024 at 4:54 AM

@KarluskaP - Karli Bonneโ€™ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

I donโ€™t know whatโ€™s real anymore https://t.co/9DwOLjLhNI

Saved - January 12, 2025 at 7:54 AM

@AgentJ1989 - AgentJ

@IanCarrollShow It would be hilarious if you started talking about this next: https://t.co/wBhubcPJbn

@AgentJ1989 - AgentJ

https://t.co/QCOpjXTLQL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The gas chambers at two Polish camps can be examined, with evidence of Zyklon B gas usage visible in delousing chambers at Auschwitz. In contrast, the Mauthausen gas chamber shows no traces of Zyklon B, and its door cannot lock from the inside, making it impossible to confine victims. Historical claims about the number of camps with gas chambers have been revised over the years, with many camps in Germany and Austria investigated and found lacking evidence. The discussion touches on antisemitism and the brutality faced by individuals based on their ethnicity or beliefs. The figure of six million Jewish deaths has also been challenged, with official revisions significantly lowering the number of deaths at Auschwitz.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are based on my own examination into the physical evidence. The gas chambers of buildings claim to be the gas chambers still exist at 2 of the camps in Poland. You can go there. You can conduct forensic tests or you can go there and just look for yourself. Now, one of the gas chambers at the Majdanek camp Speaker 1: We'll show you. Show them the film. This is a film that mister Cole would be happy to show you and has shown. Speaker 0: Alright. Now, number Most importantly, the Zyklon B gas that is said to have been used leaves blue stains and traces on the walls. These are the delousing chambers at Birkenau, at the Auschwitz Birkenau camp. They are loaded with blue staining that indicates Zyklon B gas usage. Here I am in the inside of the de laussing chamber. The blue staining is clear. The traces are measurable even 50 years after the fact. But now we come to the inside of a gas chamber, supposedly murderous gas chamber at the Mauthausen camp in Austria. There is no blue staining on the walls, no Zyklon B traces in the walls. They have been measured. There is no Zyklon B residue. The fears after the fact, it exists at the De Lausanne Chambers. It does not exist in the supposedly homicidal gas chambers. Here we see the door to the Mauthausen gas chamber. It does not lock. It doesn't lock. The latches can be opened from the inside or the outside, as I am showing right here. You cannot lock somebody into this room, a door to one of the gas chambers at the Majdanek camp in Poland. Same thing. The door should be coming up here we go. The door latches only from the inside. Here I am. I'm standing inside the gas chamber, and I'm showing the latches from the inside. Now this door opens into the chamber. If you're gonna pack a 1,000 people in a room and kill them, you can't have a door that then opens into the room because they will be piled up against the door where they died. And I am now showing that the latches of this door, they latch inside. You cut you cannot lock somebody into this room. Okay. Speaker 1: Well, you're a real Columbo, David. Speaker 0: Wait a minute. Wait now. Excuse me, Phil. Why don't you ask wait a minute. Why don't you ask why anyone else hasn't brought this up in 50 years since the since the war was over. Why haven't there been other Columbians? Speaker 1: How many Jews died, David, in your opinion? Speaker 0: It's impossible to say right now. Why don't you ask me? Speaker 1: Well, would you have an idea? You certainly seem to know which way the doors opened 50 years ago. No. I mean, aren't we? Let me, let me just talk personally about how Speaker 0: do you how do you do it? Wait a minute. I wanna put the issue in some perspective, especially for the audience. When the war was over in 1945, it was claimed that there were 22 camps that had gas chambers in them. 22. By the 19 fifties, 16 of those camps had been officially revised by the Americans, the Israelis, the British, the Soviets, and now it was only claimed that 6 camps in Poland had gas chambers. In other words, what happened was the camps that were in Germany and Austria were a they were able to be investigated by Americans, freely investigated by historians. But the camps in Poland were not made available to Western researchers. Speaker 1: How are you? Speaker 0: Well, yeah. But this is a complex topic. Speaker 1: I certainly is. David, you, you are familiar and know and have traveled with Ernst Zundel. Is that so? Speaker 0: No. I have not traveled with Ernst Zundel. Speaker 1: Did you meet him in Poland? Speaker 0: I met him in Poland. I've met him twice in my entire life. I met him twice in my town. Speaker 1: What did you do? Have a beer? I mean, what's travel mean? I don't care. You met him in Poland. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: He introduced you to Neo he is a Neo Nazi. You don't deny that. Speaker 0: Of course he is. Speaker 1: And he had an access program in Colorado which has subsequently been pulled off the air after complaints about assignment visa falls. Speaker 0: No. No. I'm sorry, Phil. This is not about who I have met in my life. I just met you. Does that mean I'm Marlo Thomas? This this is about this is Speaker 1: What is it about? Speaker 0: This is about physical evidence. This is about the gas chambers not having high quantity residue. This is about windows in a gas chamber. One clip they did a show was me standing in front of the Midenet gas chamber with a big plate glass window in it that was not barred or covered in any way. Speaker 1: Were you bar mitzvah, David? Speaker 0: I'm an atheist. I made that clear to your production staff. Speaker 1: Well, but you may not have at age 13. Speaker 0: I've always been an atheist. Speaker 1: You've always been. But you do claim Zundel as a as a friend, do you? Speaker 0: No. He's a man I met twice in my life. I met Mayor Bradley. I met their friend twice in my life. Speaker 1: Father, are you being a social companion Speaker 0: I am not a social companion. I said hi Speaker 1: to him. Purpose would you meet him in Poland? Speaker 0: I was in Poland. He was in Poland. He heard there was a Jewish revisionist. He came by to say hi. Mhmm. What am I supposed to do? Kick him in the balls? I see. Speaker 1: Please. Please. In a sense. Speaker 0: No. Wait a minute. Please. Speaker 1: Let me just give you this. Speaker 0: Now please be clear that I have also worked with holocaust researchers on the other side of this issue. I have worked with them far more than any. Speaker 1: Do you believe in antisemitism? I asked Speaker 0: you, I do. Speaker 1: You do. Speaker 0: Of course, I do. Speaker 1: Do you believe it was especially virulent in, Germany? Speaker 0: Of course I do. Speaker 1: You do. And do you believe people disappeared and were destroyed because of their Jewishness? Speaker 0: People were let's be specific. Can you Speaker 1: go from a course to Speaker 0: a No. Wait a minute. Be specific. People were rounded up based on their religion alone, their ethnicity alone, their political views alone. They were put in camps and made to work at forced labor. They were killed. They were shot. There was all manner of brutality. It is something that no human being should ever have to Speaker 1: go you say Speaker 0: that? History books are not about making crass generalizations. If you are going to claim there was a gas chamber program, you have to be able to offer evidence for Speaker 1: much more than that. You claim that 6,000,000 did not die. Speaker 0: The 6,000,000 figure is already dead. In 1989, the Auschwitz State Museum, which had claimed from the Nuremberg trials in 1945 and 46 onwards, that 4,100,000 people died at Auschwitz. In 1989, that number was officially revised to somewhere around 700,000. Speaker 1: Yes. We do have people who, care very much about the existence of what some argue are deniers, these, gentlemen would say revisionists. Michael Shermer will join us in a moment. He's a professor of history at Oxford, at Occidental College in Los Angeles.
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 1:08 AM

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

It would be even funnier if it werenโ€™t true. https://t.co/YqndUsBWNo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Who can take your money with a twinkle in their eye? The government. They tax everything, fund healthcare and climate initiatives, and even ignore the Constitution. Who can give bailouts and raise their own salaries despite failure? The government. They mix things up, making everything taste good, even if it means the founding fathers would be rolling in their graves. Iโ€™ll sing it anyway, even if you hate me, because the government can do all of these things.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who can take your money? Who can take your money? With a twinkle in their eye. A twinkle in their eye. Speaker 1: Take it all away and give it to some other guy. Speaker 0: Government. The government can. And who can tax the sunrise? Who can tax the trees? Speaker 1: I'll let you run a business and collect up all the fees. The government the government Speaker 0: can't. Speaker 1: And the government can't because they mix it up with eyes and make it all taste good. Speaker 0: The government takes everything we make to pay for all of their solutions, like health care, climate change, pollution. Just throw away the constitution. I wrote that. Thank you. And who can give a bailout? Speaker 1: Tell us Speaker 0: to behave. Tell us to behave. Speaker 1: And make the founding fathers roll over in their grave. The I Speaker 0: don't care if you hate me. I'm gonna sing it anyway. Oh, the government can't. Speaker 1: And the government can't go and mix it up Speaker 0: And who can be a failure in so many ways And instead of getting fired, hey. We'll give ourself a raise. California, you know what I'm talking about. I could.
Saved - March 10, 2025 at 12:17 PM

@FatEmperor - Ivor Cummins

So, so true: https://t.co/LJv2iqWKwC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Let me tell you about Jimmy. He starts his day with sugary cereal and juice, leading to crashes at school, followed by a lunch of grilled cheese, Cheetos, and soda. Educators suggest medication, and he spends his time indoors, glued to screens. After school, he's stuck inside, later eating takeout with his parents. Before bed, more screen time disrupts his sleep. This continues for years, leaving him overweight, lonely, depressed, and overmedicated. He seeks guidance on TV but sees politicians, funded by industry, cutting off the person speaking. There are millions of Jimmys in this country who want to get healthy but lack the means to do so. RFK Jr. has the knowledge, experience, skills, and passion to address this chronic disease epidemic, because this is not just an economic issue, it is a spiritual one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna tell you a little story about Jimmy. So Jimmy wakes up in the morning and both parents work, so they don't have time to make him eggs. And he has frosted flakes and fruit juice. So he goes to school and he's all hopped up on sugar, and then he crashes. And then he does the school lunch program and he has grilled cheese, Cheetos, and cherry coke. Hopped up again, then crashes. The people at the school tell the parents, man, this kid must be bipolar or ADHD. You gotta medicate him. So he's medicated. And then he doesn't really do recess because he's looking on his phone the whole time. After school program, he's inside. And then he goes home and since his parents are helicopter parents, they don't let him outside to play in the neighborhood because they're worried about pedophiles. So he goes inside, plops himself in front of the television until his parents come home, and they're too busy because they're back from work, and so they order takeout. Mhmm. More fried food. And then he sits in front of his iPad before he goes to sleep. And he doesn't get a good sleep because he's had screen time all day, no sunlight, and no exercise. And this cycle repeats itself for years until he's single, suicidal, over medicated, fat, sick, lonely, and depressed. And then he turns on TV because he wants to see what a Kennedy has to say about making America healthy again. And what does he see? He sees disgusting looking senators who are funded by industry cutting him off so we can't even hear what the guy has to say. Are millions of Jimmy's out there in this country. They've been neglected, they've been preyed upon, and they wanna get healthy. But they don't have the knowledge, the support system, or the environment to make it happen. RFK Jr. Is not a perfect person. None of the great leaders are. But he is the perfect person because he has the knowledge, the experience, the skills, the passion to get inside of the government and turn this chronic disease epidemic around. Because this is not just an economic issue. It is a spiritual issue.
Saved - April 30, 2025 at 9:27 PM

@WVfunnyguy - YourFavWestVirginian

๐Ÿ˜ฑ omg ! You have to watch this! This dude was funny and Iโ€™m not sure he meant to be! https://t.co/koVcCcFlN0

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the practice of news anchors exaggerating Hispanic accents when pronouncing Hispanic names, regardless of the anchor's ethnicity. They contrast this with the pronunciation of Irish names, where no similar accent shift occurs. The speaker uses the example of Alejandro Mayorkas, whose name they claim is pronounced differently on CNN. The speaker believes this phenomenon, along with other unspecified reasons, led to the election of Donald Trump in 2016 and will lead to his reelection in 2024.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every time we hear a Hispanic name on TV, whether or not the anchor is Hispanic, we suddenly have to shape shift into a perfect Hispanic accent. Police arrested 25 year old Ilan Alain Sanchez. And I mean that honestly. Why do we do that? When I say Alejandro Mayorkas, I just say Alejandro Mayorkas. But on CNN, it's Alejandro Mayorkas. I'm Irish. When police arrest someone with an Irish name, I don't say police just arrested 25 year old Charlie McLaughlin. I just say police arrested Charlie McLaughlin. Like, stop that. Stop. And it's for all of these reasons and everything that I just mentioned, that America elected Donald Trump in 2016 and then elected Donald Trump again in 2024.

@WVfunnyguy - YourFavWestVirginian

Itโ€™s true tho ๐Ÿ˜‚

Saved - May 7, 2025 at 8:14 PM

@DavidJHarrisJr - David J Harris Jr

You canโ€™t make this stuff up ๐Ÿคฃ https://t.co/FRgG80kTJC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims most people in the country voted for Trump and that he won the popular vote. Speaker 1 disputes this, stating it was a slim majority of voters and that too few people voted. Speaker 0 says those who cared about issues voted for Trump to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Speaker 1 counters that lots of voters were purged from voter rolls before the election. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of election denial. Speaker 1 accuses the "narcissist in that building" of gaslighting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most people in this country voted for Trump. Speaker 1: It's a lie. The slim majority of voters we are shamefully, were very few voters who showed up, but stop that bullshit. It is not a majority. It's not a lie. Speaker 0: This bullshit is Speaker 1: a lie. Speaker 0: He actually won the popular vote. Speaker 1: I am telling you, it was a slim majority of voters. Are you hearing me? Because I can sign a people on a vote. That is why you're not supposed to spread the bullshit that all most Americans are looking for this because Speaker 0: Well, people care, then they vote. Speaker 1: Enough because too few people voted. That's a disgraceful Speaker 0: care about issues, then they vote. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well If you wanna Speaker 0: The ones who cared voted for Trump to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in government. Speaker 1: Because lots of voters were purged from voter rolls before the election. Speaker 0: This sounds familiar to me. It sounds like election denial. Is that what you guys are doing? Speaker 1: Just stop. Speaker 0: I'm just because I thought we weren't supposed to do that. Speaker 1: Just stop. Speaker 0: Yeah. So I I just I'm just you just told me that. You just said this. Right? Speaker 1: You know, the damage that is being done by the narcissist in that building, the people who believe his bullshit. I know gaslighting when I see it and when I hear it. So just stop. Speaker 0: Okay. Stop. You don't have to talk to me. I'm I'm actually on my way over here. So
Saved - October 5, 2025 at 10:36 PM

@CMDRVALTHOR - VAL THOR

Wow, what a shocking truth! - Brian Clark https://t.co/VVquNsZznQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
During 2021, while we were locked down, our government in The United States paid researchers to investigate two of the 36 poisons that were found in all COVID nineteen patients, injected into mammals to create glioblastoma tumors within seventy two hours; they were paid to reverse glioblastoma tumor formation that they created in three days or less, and they dissolved within seventy two hours glioblastoma tumors with nicotine. Nicotine is a published cure for Parkinson's disease, MS, Alzheimer's, ulcerative colitis, all arthritises, all of them. Psoriatic, gout, osteo, rheumatoid. Did you know it's also a published cure? I already mentioned it. Myocarditis. Did you know autism traits? Yep. They've already investigated nicotine patches between the shoulder blades of all children and adults, and within seven days they see improvements in all their symptoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that during 2021, while we were all locked down at home during COVID nineteen, that our government in The United States was paying researchers to investigate two of the 36 poisons that were found in all COVID patients, and they injected them into mammals and created within seventy two hours glioblastoma tumors. Right. And then they were paid by our government to see if they could reverse glioblastoma tumor formation that they created in three days or less. And do you know they dissolved within seventy two hours glioblastoma tumors with? Nicotine. Did you know nicotine is a published cure for Parkinson's disease, MS, Alzheimer's, ulcerative colitis, all arthritises, all of them. Psoriatic, gout, osteo, rheumatoid. Did you know it's also a published cure? I already mentioned it. Myocarditis. Did you know that autism traits? Yep. They've already investigated nicotine patches between the shoulder blades of all children and adults, and within seven days they see improvements in all their symptoms.
Saved - February 28, 2026 at 12:43 AM

@idropFbombs - ๐’ฆ๐‘’๐“๐“๐“ŽเฟŽโ˜ฝ

Jim Carrey doesn't look, sound or behave like Jim Carrey. Actors playing actors. ๐Ÿ’ฏ https://t.co/LoElUgeZc5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether the person receiving the Cesar Award was really Jim Carrey, presenting several points of discrepancy. - Eye color: Jim Carrey has deep brown eyes, especially during the The Mask and The Truman Show era. The award recipient had blue, nearly transparent eyes under bright stage lights, which contradicts Carreyโ€™s known eye color. - Public presence and personality: Jim Carrey has gradually distance himself from mainstream Hollywood social events and has publicly expressed detachment from fame and celebrity culture. In contrast, the award recipient was very outgoing on stage, frequently interacting with the media and using exaggerated gestures, which is inconsistent with Carreyโ€™s low-key personality. - Mannerisms and performance: The recipientโ€™s classic movements and expressions appeared deliberately stiff. While at the ceremony, he occasionally made familiar funny faces and exaggerated gestures, these seemed like intentional imitations of Jim Carrey remembered from memory, lacking natural humor. Both gestures and facial expressions carried a trace of mechanical precision, like a trained stand-in performing Jim Carrey. The speaker concludes by asking for an opinion: Do you think the person accepting the award at the Cesar Awards was really Jim Carrey?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you notice Jim Carrey's blue eyes? Nobody realized that the person accepting the award at the fifty first Cesar Awards was actually Jim Carrey's body double. First, Jim Carrey's eyes have always been a deep brown, especially during the The Mask and The Truman Show era. Those eyes carried a signature brown glow, lively and full of vitality. However, the person receiving the award had blue eyes, appearing almost unnaturally transparent under the bright stage lights. Second, anyone familiar with Jim Carrey knows that in recent years, he has gradually distanced himself from mainstream Hollywood social events and has publicly expressed his detachment from fame and celebrity culture. In contrast, the award recipient was very outgoing on stage, interacting frequently with the media and using exaggerated gestures, completely inconsistent with Jim Carrey's low key personality. Finally, his classic movements and expressions seemed deliberately stiff. At the ceremony, he occasionally made familiar funny faces and exaggerated gestures, but these seemed like intentional imitations of Jim Carrey remembered from memory, lacking natural humor. Both the gestures and facial expressions carried a trace of mechanical precision, like a trained stand in performing Jim Carrey. Do you think the person accepting the award at the Cesar Awards was really Jim Carrey?
View Full Interactive Feed