reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 5, 2023 at 9:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
An anonymous data scientist and another individual scraped national ballot counting data from the NY Times website. The data shows a consistent ratio of Biden to Trump ballots in mail-in votes. This pattern is expected due to random shuffling during transport. Anomalies in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Michigan suggest potential fraud, with irregular shifts in ballot ratios. The uniformity of reported ballot returns indicates fraud and provides a timestamp of fraudulent actions. Mail-in ballots make fraud easier to detect. Disseminate this information and stay safe.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

The following information is provided via an anonymous data scientist and another anonymous individual who wrote a script to scrape the national ballot counting time series data of off the @nytimes website.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

This is based on their proprietary "Edison" data source which would ordinarily be impossible to access for people outside the press.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

The CSV is available here: s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id145669… And the script to generate it is here: https://pastebin.com/NkYXrJEX

Pastebin.com - Not Found (#404) Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time. pastebin.com

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

I suggest that everyone back up both of these files, bc this is an extremely important data source, and we cant risk anyone taking it down.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

What we are looking at will be time series analysis and you will see that it is extremely difficult to create convincing synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

One of the first things noticed while exploring the dataset is that there seems to be an obvious pattern in the ratio of new #Biden ballots to new #Trump ballots. https://t.co/jJAAF6Pp9X

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

As we can see on this log-log plot, for many of the counting progress updates, we see an almost constant ratio of #Biden to #Trump. It's such a regular pattern that we can actually fit a linear regression model to it with near-perfect accuracy, barring some outliers.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

How could this be possible? Is this a telltale sign of fraud? Surprisingly, as it will be shown, the answer is no! This is actually expected behavior. Also, we can use this weird pattern in the ballot counting to spot fraud!

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Here is the same pattern for Florida. We see this linear pattern again. https://t.co/YyVD9oWpwN

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

and again https://t.co/hDo1kKWZpf

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

and again https://t.co/2boSyJqPcC

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

and again all over the country. What appears to be happening is that points on the straight line are actually mail in votes. The reason they're so homogeneous across with respect to the ratio of #Biden vs #Trump votes is that they get randomly shuffled in the mail... https://t.co/0gqtTqFT4R

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

like a deck of cards. Since the ballots are randomly mixed together during transport, spanning areas occupied by multiple voting demographics, we can expect the ratio of mail-in #Biden ballots to mail-in #Trump ballots will remain relatively constant over time...

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

and across different reporting updates. Lets dig a little deeper into this:

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Here is a plot of the same Florida voting data, but this time it's the ratio of #Biden to #Trump ballots, versus time. What we see is that the initial ballot reportings are very noisy and "random". https://t.co/FMgzvdhJu4

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

The initial reporting represents in-person voting. These vote reports have such large variation bc in-person voting happens across different geographic areas that have different political alignments.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

We can see this same pattern of noisy in-person voting, followed by homogeneous mail-in reporting in almost all cases.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

What we see in almost all examples across the country is that the ratio of mail-in Dem to Rep ballots is very consistent across time, but with the notable drift from Dem to slightly more Rep. https://t.co/SYlV0JZ2Iz

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

This slight drift from D to R mail-ins occurs again and again, and is likely due to outlying rural areas having more R votes. These outlying areas take longer to ship their ballots to the polling centers.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Now we're getting into the really good stuff. When we see mail-in ballot counting where there isn't relatively stable ratios of D and R ballots that slightly drift R, we have an anomaly! Anomalies themselves are not necessarily fraud, but they can help us spot fraud more easily.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Now let's look at some anomalies:

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

This is the Wisconsin vote counting history log. Again, on the Y axis we have the ratio of D to R ballots in reporting batch, and on the X axis we have reporting time. https://t.co/E2rP6Zpa8c

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Around 4am there, there is a marked shift in the ratio of D to R mail-in ballots. Based on other posts in this thread, this should not happen. This is an anomaly, and while anomalies are not always fraud, often they may point to fraud.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

so what happened just before 3am CST in Wisconsin? This did! https://t.co/t7DTmMwIOB

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Around 3am Wisconsin time, a fresh batch of 169k new absentee ballots arrived. They were supposed to stop accepting new ballots, but eh, whatever I guess.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

By 4am the D to R ratio was all thrown out of whack. That is because these ballots were not sampled from the real Wisconsin voter population, and they were not randomized in the mail sorting system with the other ballots. They inherently have a different D to R signature...

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

than the rest of the ballots quite possibly bc additional ballots were added to the batch, either through backdating or ballot manufacturing or software tampering. This of this being kind of analogous to carbon-14 dating, but for ballot batch authenticity.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

lets look at another anomaly: https://t.co/L9cCqJ9mKB

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Here is Pennsylvania's vote counting history. For the first part of the vote counting process, we see the same pattern for mail-in ballots that we've seen in every other state in the country, which is relatively stable D to R ratio that gradually drifts R as more ballots...

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

come in from rural outlying areas. But then as counting continues, the D to R ratio in mail-in ballots inexplicably begin "increasing". Again, this should not happen, and it is observed almost nowhere else in the country, because all of the ballots are randomly shuffled...

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

in the mail system and should be homogeneous during counting. The only exceptions to this are other suspect states that also have anomalies. Again, this is evidence of ballot backdating, manufacturing of software tampering.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Lets look at another anomaly: https://t.co/pjNphstErK

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

In Georgia we see pretty much the same story as Pennsylvania: increasing fractions of mail-in D ballots over time even though it defies logic and we see this pattern no where else in the country.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

In Michigan, we see a combination of Wisconsin strangeness, together with the GA/PA weirdness. We see both signs of contaminated ballot dumping, and ballot ratios drifting toward dems when they should not be. https://t.co/kYdAuDqKyZ

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Virginia: https://t.co/gYoV2QrehH

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Now in fairness, VA is the only state out of the 50 that has anomalies but has not had accusations of voter fraud, yet. I think this is the exception that proves the rule. Yet to figure out what causes this anomalous shift, but here it is so no one accuses me of holding it back.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Lets wrap this up: It appears Dems shot themselves in the foot bc making everyone do mail-in ballots actually makes it easier to catch mail-in ballot fraud. Bc all of the ballots go through the postal system, they get shuffled like a deck of cards, so we expect reported...

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

ballot return to be extremely UNIFORM in terms of D vs R ratio, but to drift slightly towards R over time bc some of those ballots travel farther. This pattern proves fraud and is a verifiable timestamp of when each fraudulent action occurred.

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Please disseminate as necessary. Good luck. Stay safe. Be kind to your neighbors. #Epsteindidntkillhimself

Saved - February 15, 2023 at 12:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jenny Cohn bids farewell after 7 years of research on election security. Her work covers topics such as the 2000 US Presidential Election, the 2016 attack on America's election infrastructure, and the dangers of Dominionism. She also sheds light on the shady connections of figures like Roger Stone and Doug Mastriano. Cohn hopes to have made a small difference for the better.

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

I think I’m done with this bird. I reactivated only so I can find my own research and to post a farewell thread of some of my work. Thank u to those who supported me. It’s been an interesting 7 years or so. I hope I made a small difference 4 the better. 1/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/the-2000-u-s-presidential-election-was-a-harbinger-of-things-to-come-fecb1de53fa8

The 2000 U.S. presidential election was a harbinger of things to come. The 2000 presidential election was a “watershed moment” for U.S. elections and “harbinger of things to come,” as Jonathan Simon, a seasoned election-security advocate and author, remarked when I… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

2/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/whats-all-the-fuss-about-ukraine-1ba8e53d99ee

What’s all the fuss about Ukraine? Ukraine gained independence from the former Soviet Union in 1991. Ever since, Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, has wanted Ukraine to join with Russia in forming a Eurasian Union. But many… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

3/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/2016-the-attack-on-americas-election-infrastructure-e8f4f895d91c

2016: The attack on America’s election infrastructure Russia’s attack on America’s election infrastructure in 2016 has been largely forgotten amidst the many other legitimate concerns about that election and later events. Those other concerns and events… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

4/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/roger-stone-was-a-dark-force-even-before-the-2016-election-5dc5e127a53d

Roger Stone was a dark political force even before 2016 Even before the 2016 presidential election, Roger Stone was a dark force, screwing with voters’ perceptions of reality and corrupting politics from behind the scenes. In 1972, at just nineteen years… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

5/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/far-right-agitator-jack-posobiec-spreads-lies-and-antisemitic-hate-yes-russia-loves-him-83940393c69a

Roger Stone protege Jack Posobiec has spread horrific lies and normalized antisemitism. One of America’s most prolific liars is a former naval intelligence officer-turned-far-right-agitator named Jack Posobiec. For those who are unaware, Posobiec is a protege of Roger Stone and a former… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

6/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/by-singling-out-of-dominion-the-gop-has-successfully-deflected-from-legitimate-election-security-dcc7a3d21550

By singling out Dominion, the GOP has successfully deflected from legitimate election-security… By singling out Dominion, the GOP has successfully deflected from legitimate election-security concerns involving America’s largest voting machine vendor, ES&S. Although you would never know it to… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

7/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/what-did-steve-bannon-know-and-when-did-he-know-it-ask-his-pennsylvania-pals-88550fa7841a

What did Steve Bannon know and when did he know it? Ask his Pennsylvania pals. Steve Bannon has been indicted for defying a congressional subpoena to provide documents and testimony regarding the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. While Bannon tries to run out the clock… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

8/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/why-have-so-many-people-spread-misinformation-about-voting-systems-and-internet-connectivity-247bd9877419

Public officials provided false assurances about the legitimacy of Trump’s poll-defying win in 2016. People sometimes ask me why I became an advocate of election security and transparency. One of the main reasons is that, in the wake of reports of Russian interference in 2016, I learned that public… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

9/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/max-cleland-rip-georgias-2002-election-4c8f65fb9c6c

Georgia’s 2002 election was ground zero for paperless voting machines, & the state turned blood red… I have previously written about the GOP’s questionable victory in Alabama’s 2002 gubernatorial race. But this wasn’t the only eyebrow-raising Republican win in 2002. In Georgia, the GOP unexpectedly… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

10/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/if-you-think-youre-sure-the-gop-has-never-hacked-an-election-then-you-don-t-know-the-saga-of-don-d2773caf88d2

If you think you’re sure the GOP has never hacked an election, then you don’t know the saga of Don… In 2002, Alabama’s democratic governor, Don Siegelman ran for reelection against Republican Bob Riley. Siegelman had previously served as attorney general, secretary of state, lieutenant governor… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

11/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/neither-trump-nor-the-other-republicans-complaining-about-dominion-voting-cared-about-serious-5b733ea3d4a

Georgia’s 2018 midterm election was plagued by election integrity concerns In Georgia’s 2018 gubernatorial election, Democrat Stacey Abrams ran against Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State, Brian Kemp. In the runup to the election, Kemp’s office purged 560,000 voters… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

12/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/ted-cruz-won-his-2018-senate-race-against-beto-orourke-in-an-election-where-about-50-of-the-87336c0507eb

Recent Texas elections have been tainted by touchscreen voting & hash validation problems involving… In 2018, Beto O’Rourke, a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives, tried to unseat Ted Cruz, a Republican member of the U.S. Senate. The race between O’Rourke and Cruz received… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

13/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/es-s-is-americas-largest-voting-machine-vendor-7ac10934a923

ES&S is America’s largest voting machine vendor In September 2020, a Texas examiner’s report said there was a “ bug” in ES&S’s hash verification script. What happened after is unknown. First, a cautionary note. Close partisan associations and… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

14/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2022/08/underreported-and-massive-theocratic-movement-joins-forces-with-michael-flynn-and-roger-stone/

Underreported and Massive Theocratic Movement Joins Forces with Michael Flynn and Roger Stone - Bucks County Beacon A tour featuring “Seven Mountains” Christian dominionists, Flynn, and Stone is coming to Pennsylvania. buckscountybeacon.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

15/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2022/09/michael-flynn-and-roger-stones-dangerous-crusade-continues/

Michael Flynn and Roger Stone’s Dangerous Crusade Continues - Bucks County Beacon The militant “Black Robe Regiment” is set to recruit pastors with Flynn in Pennsylvania. A Christian leader tied to the Regiment will rally for Mastriano Friday. buckscountybeacon.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

16/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2022/11/qa-with-jennifer-cohn-a-christian-nationalism-post-election-debriefing/

Q&A with Jennifer Cohn: A Christian Nationalism Post-Election Debriefing - Bucks County Beacon Editor Cyril Mychalejko asked Cohn five questions to make sense of the election, assess this extremist threat moving forward, and to figure out what can be done to reinforce the crumbling wall separating church and state in the country. buckscountybeacon.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

17/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2022/11/united-in-purpose-the-shady-christian-nonprofit-tied-to-a-massive-voter-data-leak-and-the-big-lie/

United in Purpose: The shady Christian nonprofit tied to a massive voter data leak and the 'Big Lie' - Bucks County Beacon Ben Carson rallied for Doug Mastriano last week. He’s revered within a powerful Christian nationalist network that leaked voter data and was part of the Stop the Steal movement. buckscountybeacon.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

18/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2022/10/dominionism-is-on-the-ballot-in-november-but-most-voters-have-never-heard-of-it/

Dominionism Is on the Ballot in November, but Most Voters Have Never Heard of It - Bucks County Beacon The New Apostolic Reformation, a dominionist movement, was more involved in Jan 6 than is generally known. buckscountybeacon.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

19/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2023/01/roger-stone-deserves-more-scrutiny-for-his-role-in-the-events-leading-to-january-6/

Roger Stone Deserves More Scrutiny for His Role in the Events Leading to January 6 - Bucks County Beacon Stone incorporated violent extremist groups into the “Stop the Steal” effort, which was itself a product of his warped political mind writes columnist Jennifer Cohn in the first of a three-part series. buckscountybeacon.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

20/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2023/02/january-6-committee-made-a-mistake-leaving-this-stone-unturned/

January 6 Committee Made a Mistake Leaving This Stone Unturned - Bucks County Beacon This is part 2 of a 3-part series exposing political fixer Roger Stone’s central role in creating the climate of hate, division, disinformation, and physical intimidation that culminated in an insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021. buckscountybeacon.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

21/ https://youtu.be/hoTeeZvWCXk

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

22/ https://youtu.be/SXtH85gK5F4

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

23/ https://youtu.be/3whvWY3jJ0E

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

24/ https://youtu.be/4g0VOSKDTE8

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

25/ https://youtu.be/Ikgsoheb7Ic

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

26/ https://youtu.be/Mjbig_7EmpU

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

27/ I’ve seen one genius on here claiming that I’m actually a secret Roger Stone ally.🙄 https://jennycohn1.medium.com/the-oath-keepers-roger-stone-and-the-bundys-3ae833268390

The Oath Keepers, Roger Stone, Alex Jones, & the Bundys Earlier this week, the Department of Justice filed seditious conspiracy charges against Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the paramilitary group called the Oath Keepers, and ten other members of the… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

28/ https://youtu.be/WRpzn3lm0B4

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

29/ https://whowhatwhy.org/politics/elections/election-assistance-commission-investigated-ess-voting-systems/

Election Assistance Commission Investigated ES&S Voting Systems - WhoWhatWhy Texas officials blasted ES&S’s software installation and authentication methods but decided to certify its voting system anyway. whowhatwhy.org

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

30/ https://jennycohn1.medium.com/florida-midterm-elections-illustrate-importance-of-legislation-requiring-robust-manual-election-1571f736173

Florida’s 2018 election (won by Ron DeSantis for Governor and Rick Scott for Senate) was marred by… During the 2018 midterm election in Florida, the incumbent in the U.S. senate race was Democratic Senator Bill Nelson. His opponent was then Governor Rick Scott (R ). Before entering politics, Nelson… jennycohn1.medium.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

31/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2022/06/doug-mastriano-is-a-clear-and-present-danger-to-democracy/

Doug Mastriano Is a Clear and Present Danger to Democracy - Bucks County Beacon November's Pennsylvania governor’s race will impact election integrity for the entire nation in 2024. buckscountybeacon.com

@jennycohn1 - jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

32/ https://buckscountybeacon.com/2022/07/producer-of-mastriano-film-tied-to-charles-bausman-lancaster-man-who-fled-to-moscow-after-the-insurrection/

Producer of Mastriano Film Tied to Charles Bausman, Lancaster Man Who Fled To Moscow After the Insurrection - Bucks County Beacon While the media focuses on local theaters refusing to show “The Return of the American Patriot,” they are missing the bigger story that an international network of Russia-linked “Christian” propagandists seems to have targeted PA. buckscountybeacon.com
Saved - August 15, 2023 at 12:39 AM

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

https://t.co/imU71XhxiM

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Layout of the Voter Fraud… 👇🏼

Saved - August 15, 2023 at 12:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
@Vltra_MK shared a link, prompting @DecentFiJC to emphasize its importance. @glasses_no then shared two links related to Scytl, a Spanish company involved in reporting election results for US jurisdictions.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@Vltra_MK This is incredibly important to understand.😳😳😳

@glasses_no - NoRoseGlasses

@DecentFiJC @Vltra_MK https://www.sott.net/article/244685-A-Spanish-Company-Known-As-Scytl-Will-Be-Reporting-Election-Results-For-Hundreds-of-US-Jurisdictions https://www.sott.net/article/444461-Scytl-voting-software-has-all-the-tools-it-needs-for-election-fraud?ysclid=llbkakirqw845860522

A Spanish Company Known As Scytl Will Be Reporting Election Results For Hundreds of U.S. Jurisdictions -- Sott.net Do you know who is going to be counting the votes on Election Day 2012? Most Americans never even think about this. Most Americans just assume that their votes will count and that the government will ensure that the counting process is done... sott.net
Scytl voting software has all the tools it needs for election fraud -- Sott.net Free Press readers may be familiar with Scytl, the promoter of online and mobile voting, and their apparent connections to the intelligence community. Renewed research into Scytl has revealed new connections to the intelligence community, new... sott.net
Saved - September 2, 2023 at 6:27 PM

@FIENDSQUAD - 𝖎𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝖋𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖉𝖘 ™

Hahahahaha fuck you... [https://cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/election_infrastructure_subsector_specific_plan.pdf]

Saved - September 2, 2023 at 8:26 PM

@FIENDSQUAD - 𝖎𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝖋𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖉𝖘 ™

Hahahahaha! Fuck you pt 3... [https://cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Election%2520Infrastructure%2520SSP_508%2520Compliant%2520%252807.31.18%2529.pdf…]

Page Not Found | CISA cisa.gov
Saved - September 2, 2023 at 9:29 PM

@FIENDSQUAD - 𝖎𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝖋𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖉𝖘 ™

OH BIG FUCK YOU HAHAHAHAHAHA [https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Defending-2020.pdf]

Alliance For Securing Democracy Alliance For Securing Democracy securingdemocracy.gmfus.org
Saved - September 19, 2023 at 11:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a potential FTX scandal, further research is needed. Thoma Bravo, owner of SolarWinds, acquired CyberTrust and DigiCert. These entities somehow verify all elections in all states. Thoma Bravo invested $125mn in FTX, becoming a major backer. Joe Bankman, father of FTX's Sam Bankman Fried, contacted Thoma Bravo's owner, Orlando Bravo. Bravo, a vocal supporter of FTX, saw the company's potential to rival major banks. Read more for details on this intriguing connection.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

🏀 Slam Dunk! Does this have the potential to be the biggest FTX scandal yet? I think further research is warranted. Now that I am familiar with Sam Bankman Fried’s dad Joe, who worked at Arabella, let’s take this a step further in election verification territory. First let me remind you of these points. 🔵Thoma Bravo is part owner of SolarWinds. Recall the Solar Wind Hacking during the 2020 election. Recall Dominion using Solar Winds, tho they claim their version wasn’t affected. 🔵CyberTrust and DigiCert were both acquired by Thoma Bravo 🔵 DigiCert, Thoma Bravo, and CyberTrust somehow verify ALL ELECTIONS IN ALL STATES 🔵 Thoma Bravo invested more than $125mn in the round in June 2021, becoming one of FTX’s largest backers. Well, did you know that Joe Bankman contacted Orlando Bravo the owner of Thoma Bravo? “It was a surprise phone call from an old university professor that launched private equity investor Orlando Bravo into becoming one of the most prominent and vocal supporters of Sam Bankman-Fried and his crypto trading firm FTX. The call was from Joseph Bankman, a professor of law and business at Stanford University who had taught Bravo in the late 1990s. At the time, in mid-2021, Bravo’s $122bn private equity firm Thoma Bravo was opening an office in Miami, the city where Bankman’s son Sam had just paid $135mn for a 19-year naming rights contract with the local NBA team. Bankman told Bravo his son was looking for guidance on philanthropic projects in Miami to further his “effective altruism” mission. Only after they spoke did Bravo learn that Bankman-Fried was also in the process of raising a $900mn Series B funding round at a $18bn valuation, with a who’s who of investors including Sequoia Capital, BlackRock and SoftBank. He quickly called Bankman back seeking an introduction and a way into the deal, which was progressing quickly and would be the largest capital raising in crypto exchange history. Orlando Bravo would become one of Bankman-Fried’s most vocal backers on Wall Street and a champion of cryptocurrencies and FTX. He believed the company had the potential to supplant some of the world’s biggest banks, a future championed by its founder. Bankman-Fried even declared last year that if FTX became the biggest crypto exchange, buying Goldman Sachs “is not out of the question at all.” Read more 👇🏻 https://archive.is/Nz0e2 Read this ladies thred on election verification.👇🏻

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

And cross referencing like I often do.

Saved - December 16, 2023 at 3:38 PM

@EFxScout1League - E4rth_Scout1stLeague

June 2020, Transition Integrity Project engaged in war scenario, with 100 government officials, journalists & national security experts. (Officials, with Trump still President.) "Governors, Sos, AGs, should exercises to game out worst case scenarios"🧵💥 https://x.com/EFxScout1League/status/1735983594105975086?s=20

@EFxScout1League - E4rth_Scout1stLeague

Transition Integrity Project.🧵 💥John Podesta 💥Rosa Brooks 💥Jennifer Granholm 💥Bill Kristol 💥Michael Steele 💥Trey Grayson 💥David Frum https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/transition-integrity-project/ https://x.com/piggrussell3714/status/1691626397930774698?s=20

Transition Integrity Project - InfluenceWatch The Transition Integrity Project is a nominally bipartisan but functionally left-progressive and Democratic-leaning group of political and media figures that convened in the summer of 2020 to conduct simulations of the 2020 presidential election, including potential reactions by Republican President Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Joe Biden. The Project was created in late 2019 “out […] influencewatch.org
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 7:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Internal documents from the Transition Integrity Project reveal that the Democrats conducted simulation exercises in August 2020, aiming to prevent Trump from stealing the 2020 election. They anticipated the significance of mail-in ballots and strategized to secure Biden's victory, engaging in a high-stakes battle with Trump's team. The documents shed light on the Democrats' efforts to protect the election's integrity. Summary: Democrats' internal documents detail simulation exercises to safeguard the 2020 election from potential interference, focusing on mail-in ballots and countering Trump's actions.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

In my Sunrise movement investigation I obtained internal documents written by the Transition Integrity Project that show how the Democrats ran simulation exercises plotting to steal the 2020 election in Aug 2020 from Trump under the guise that they were protecting Trump from stealing an election that hadn't even happened or been contested yet. They knew mail-in-ballots were going to play a key role in the outcome of the election and were prepared for a high stakes game of chicken with Trumps team to ensure Biden's victory. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7013152/Preventing-a-Disrupted-Presidential-Election-and.pdf

Saved - January 2, 2024 at 6:59 PM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨🚨🚨 ELECTION FRAUD UPDATE A 32 page document titled “Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States” was just released. Read it here: https://cdn.nucleusfiles.com/e0/e04e630c-63ff-4bdb-9652-e0be3598b5d4/summary20of20election20fraud20in20the20swing20states.pdf https://t.co/ImxcfJ6QG8

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 10:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 2020 Presidential Election, there are allegations of election fraud in the swing states of Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Michigan. These allegations include altered and unlawfully cast votes, broken chain of custody, electronic manipulation, and missing or corrupted election files. Investigations have uncovered irregularities, unlawful activity, and fraud. The number of votes exceeds the number of voters in some cases. There were also issues with signature verification and the handling of absentee ballots. The report suggests that these irregularities and fraud may have affected the outcome of the election. It is important to review the evidence and draw your own conclusions.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States Introduction: It has often been repeated there is “no evidence” of fraud in the 2020 Election. In actuality, there is no evidence Joe Biden won. Ongoing investigations in the Swing States reveal hundreds of thousands of votes were altered and/or not lawfully cast in the Presidential Election. Joe Biden needed them. On Election Night Nov. 3, 2020, President Donald J. Trump was sailing to reelection with landslide leads in numerous battlegrounds. In Georgia, President Trump was up by 12 points, and over 335,000 votes, with 56 percent of the vote in at 10:17 p.m. In Wisconsin, President Trump was leading by 121,380 votes and 5 points at 12:12 a.m., which Fox News anchor Bret Baier noted was “not a small margin.” In Pennsylvania, President Trump was leading by 659,145 votes at 12:38 a.m., a full 15 points. In Michigan, President Trump was leading by 293,052 votes and 10 points. The election was over. However, precincts in Atlanta, Detroit, Philadelphia, Phoenix, and Milwaukee kept counting until the results reached the desired outcome, which was the opposite of the will of the voters. Georgia went from having a total of 4.7 million votes, already a record for the state, according to Brad Raffensperger’s count on Nov. 4, to certifying almost 5 million. This was 300,000 more votes than what the top elections official claimed were cast in the Election. Getting to this result in Georgia, and other states, created an irredeemably compromised Election, filled with violations of the Constitution, unlawful ballots, widespread broken chain of custody, electronic manipulation, and missing and corrupted election files that made it uncertifiable — and impossible to recreate the results. President Trump was right to voice his objections to what had unfolded before the country’s eyes. Republican poll watchers were denied access to the counting in multiple jurisdictions and ballots were counted in secret in the middle of the night without media or observers present. Countless irregularities emerged, including reports of ineligible voters, voting machine anomalies, “water main breaks,” improbable percentages of ballots for Biden, and more. Since, investigations across the country have uncovered an avalanche of irregularities, unlawful activity, manipulation of election records, destruction of evidence, and fraud. The findings, which are outcome determinative, are detailed in the summaries of the Swing States. GEORGIA🚨 • Georgia was called by 11,779 votes. • Fulton County, Georgia, the most populous county in the state, has no digital record of all in person votes cast in its original results. • Not a single ballot purportedly cast during early in-person voting was witnessed to and signed off by poll managers, as required by Georgia election rules. Seals were broken and memory cards removed from tabulators for the results of these 315,000 votes, which were printed out on different machines than the ones that tabulated them. This prevented the reconciliation of how many votes were cast on each machine. • The ballot images of these votes, along with the rest of in-person ballots cast on Election Day, were destroyed. • The vote in Georgia was counted three times: the original machine count, a statewide hand recount, and a second machine count. Each time the state, and Fulton County, reported three different results. • Fulton County did not count the same ballots during the original count and the machine recount. There are 19,541 distinct ballots that appear in one machine count but not the other. • Thousands of fraudulent “presidential only” ballots were injected into the second machine count, with huge margins favoring Joe Biden. Ballots that are blank except for the presidential contest were counted in batches together, with the pattern appearing in at least eight counties, including Fulton. This means Georgia did not have the votes to justify its original Election “results.” • The second machine count was over 17,000 votes “short.” Fulton County was instructed to “reconcile” the results by the Secretary of State, and recertified its results without divulging the extent of the vote deficiency to members of the Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections. • “Thousands of bogus votes” were ultimately added into the Election results via the second machine count. This includes 20,977 unsubstantiated votes of unknown origin. The results were missing 17,852 ballot images, and included 3,125 duplicate ballot images that were counted twice. • At least 2,871 ballots were counted two or three times in the second machine count, totaling 6,118 questionable votes. • Eighty-eight percent of Fulton County’s precincts reported a different total number of votes between the first and second machine count. • The only electronic votes that survived from the first count were the mail-in ballots, since they were tabulated on the high speed scanner their ballot images were automatically uploaded to the election server. • Ninety percent of these approximately 148,000 absentee ballots cast in Fulton County cannot be authenticated. Ballot images for 132,284 mail-in votes have no .SHA file, which is created automatically when a ballot is scanned and used to authenticate the digital image of the vote, lacking evidence they were scanned and tabulated properly, or even cast by a real voter. • 104,994 ballot image files of these mail-in ballots from the original count contained identical modified time stamps, suggesting electronic manipulation. • Fulton County does not know “how many voters cast votes” and its “lack of basic accounting controls make it impossible to determine who really won” in 2020, according to Philip Stark, a University of California, Berkeley professor who invented risk-limiting audits. Stark noted, “The electronic records of the election are not intact.” • 376,863 ballot images are missing from the first machine count, which includes all in-person votes in Fulton County. • None of the 315,000 votes cast during early voting in Fulton County were witnessed to and signed by the poll manager and two poll workers, as required by state election rules. The closing tapes for these votes are all unsigned, showed more tabulated votes than the tabulators had recorded as scanning in their protective counters, and recorded improbably low percentages for President Trump. For example, President Trump received only 0.9 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.7 percent from some of the tabulators, as if he was a third party candidate, or in a third world country. The anomalies indicate ballots were not scanned on the tabulators that printed the closing tapes, making the closing tapes fraudulent. • Tabulators used in Fulton County during early voting had their seals broken, and memory cards were reprogrammed and inserted into different scanners to count absentee ballots, in violation of election rules. This made it impossible to reconcile the true number of votes tabulated on the machines from the start of the Election to the end of counting. • 235,000 absentee ballots were requested and accepted too early, prior to the lawful date 180 days before the 2020 Election, which was May 6, 2020. These votes should have never been counted in the 2020 Election. • 4,081 false votes for Joe Biden were included in the hand count audit results for Fulton County. The false votes were the result of 36 accounting errors, which were confirmed by Governor Brian Kemp’s office and investigators working for Secretary Brad Raffensperger, yet they have never been removed from the official hand count results. These errors alone would reduce the margin to 7,698 votes. • The hand count audit included 3,935 unaccounted for votes due to 11 missing batch sheets in Fulton County. Differences from the original count to the hand audit total at least 15,690 votes, which is more than the entire election margin alone. This includes the 4,081 false Biden votes, plus “missing” votes discovered in Gwinett (1,642), Fayette (2,755), Floyd (2,700), Douglas (293), and Walton (284) counties that were likely due to machine counting errors. • Thousands of “pristine,” unfolded absentee ballots were counted during the hand count audit in Fulton County, according to at least six witnesses, which is the subject of ongoing litigation. These absentee ballots had no folds, and went 98 percent to Joe Biden, had “been added in a fraudulent manner,” witnesses said. • Fulton County certified 59,143 in-person votes on Election Day, despite the fact that only 14,152 people had voted as of 5 p.m. on Nov. 3, 2020. Evidence suggests the in-person vote total on Election Day was inflated by approximately 37,000 votes, as records show no rush to the polls during the final two hours of voting, and a screenshot of the in-person Election Day results shared by a government contractor showed only 21,843 people voted at the polls in Fulton County on Nov. 3. • Fulton County ordered over 1 million absentee ballots days before the 2020 Election, without any envelopes and the time necessary to mail. There were only 808,680 active voters in Fulton County as of Nov. 1, 2020, meaning the county had more blank mail-in ballots than the number of registered voters, and ordered them after the vast majority of mail-in ballot requests had already been sent to voters by Runbeck Election Services. • An estimated 30,000 to 92,670 illicit votes were trafficked in Georgia, as part of a massive ballot trafficking operation discovered by True the Vote. The group identified 242 traffickers in Georgia who engaged in 5,662 ballot drops into drop boxes, making an average of runs per trafficker. Over 40 percent of the illicit drops that were captured on camera were recorded between the non-voting hours of midnight and 5 a.m. • There were over 364,000 ineligible voter registrations on the rolls during the 2020 Election and likely 67,284 votes were cast from voters with invalid residency. • Massive manipulation of the Georgia voter rolls surrounding the 2020 Election has been uncovered. This includes 1,500 Voter IDs that received credit for voting in 2020, but were not on any voter rolls from 2020, some appearing for the first time on the voter rolls on Nov. 4, 2021, a year after the Election. Other findings include manipulation of inactive voters to cast ballots, “gifting” Nov. 3 votes up to 2 years after the Election, and casting votes on ballots previously rejected, cancelled, or not even turned in. • In 2020, there were absentee ballots issued to “Bangkok Thailand, Ga.,” “Denver, Ga.,” “Detroit, Ga.,” “Los Angeles, Ga.,” and other fraudulent addresses that do not exist. Ballots were fraudulently cast in 2020 from addresses listed as “Bronx, Ga.,” “Hilton Head, Ga.,” “Louisville, Ga.,” “San Diego, Ga.,” “New Orleans, Ga.,” “French Creek, Ga.,” “Virginia Beach, Ga.,” “Vicksburg, Ga.,” “Baltimore, Ga.,” “New York, Ga.,” and “Sarasota, Ga.,” all with zip codes out of state. • 43,907 drop box ballots violated chain of custody requirements in DeKalb County. • 59,000 of the 79,460 drop box ballots in Fulton County were not immediately transported to the election registrar, in violation of State Election Board rules. • An estimated 355,000 ballot transfer forms for drop box ballots are missing statewide. • Over 100,000 tally sheets for Fulton County were missing from the hand count audit, and remained missing for months after the Election. • In early January 2021, Ruby Freeman asked for an attorney because she wanted to “go live on every platform” to divulge information about how “the USB ports” were used in the 2020 Election. The expert cyber report by Professor J. Alex Halderman explained how external USB ports with election-changing malware can be inserted into Dominion machines by anyone with access, including election workers. • The presence of a “QR code mismatch” error within the Dominion tabulators that systematically undercounts votes was found in 65 out of 67 Georgia counties where records were available. The error was present in system log files for tabulators used in elections in 2020, 2021, and 2022. • The election results in Georgia in 2020 are not only unreliable, but were electronically altered, and are unsupported by the state’s own election records. The appearance of tens of thousands of unconfirmed ballots in subsequent hand and machine counts suggest reconciliation happened after the Election, meaning after it was clear what margins were needed to win. • Fulton County election officials admitted in early 2021 they do not engage in any reconciliation until weeks after Election Day. This means the number of voters showing up at the polls during each day of voting is not checked with the number of ballots tabulated each day, a basic process to ensure the number of ballots and voters match, and cannot be manipulated later. • “We can’t start reconciling that until usually a couple days before certification,” said then-Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron, during a January 2021 Board meeting. “Because we have to get that report from KnowInk. I think KnowInk sends those to the state or KnowInk sends those directly to us. But those aren’t compiled then, on Election night. So we don’t have any way to balance those then. That’s like the post-election process that we do.”

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States WISCONSIN🚨 • Wisconsin was called by 20,682 votes. • The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law, in a 4-3 decision issued in July 2022. • Wisconsin Election Commissioner Meagan Wolfe unilaterally declared ballot drop boxes could be used to vote in 2020 elections, even though “WEC’s commissioners never voted to adopt this memo.” • Ahead of the November 2020 Election, Wolfe encouraged clerks to use “creative solutions” to deploy drop boxes, that she said could be “unstaffed.” There were 528 drop boxes used in the General Election, and a total of 1,969,274 absentee votes cast, including 1,346,731 votes cast by mail, and 653,236 in-person. • In a concurring opinion to the ruling finding drop boxes to be unlawful, Justice Rebecca Bradley writes, “If the right to vote is to have any meaning at all, elections must be conducted according to law. Throughout history, tyrants have claimed electoral victory via elections conducted in violation of governing law… in Wisconsin elected officials “deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the governed.” • “The right to vote presupposes the rule of law governs elections. If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful and their results are illegitimate.” • Justice Bradley concluded “thousands of votes have been cast via this unlawful method,” using drop boxes, “thereby directly harming the Wisconsin voters.” • “The illegality of these drop boxes weakens the people’s faith that the election produced an outcome reflective of their will,” Justice Bradley writes. “The Wisconsin voters, and all lawful voters, are injured when the institution charged with administering Wisconsin elections does not follow the law, leaving the results in question…Electoral outcomes obtained by unlawful procedures corrupt the institution of voting, degrading the very foundation of free government. Unlawful votes do not dilute lawful votes so much as they pollute them, which in turn pollutes the integrity of the results.” • In the city of Milwaukee, nearly half of all its votes were cast by mail, totaling 217,424 ballots. The city deployed 15 drop boxes, with election officials claiming the drop boxes would be “under 24-hour surveillance.” However, after the election, not a single municipality in the county produced video surveillance of drop boxes in response to open records requests. Various responses included, “No records exist for your request,” “No video from requested time frame,” “No such records exist,” and “No security camera.” • The election integrity group True the Vote identified 107 ballot traffickers in Milwaukee County between Oct. 20 and Nov. 3, 2020, who each made 20 or more visits to drop boxes. Each trafficker made an average 26 visits, and as many as 15 in one day, and made multiple visits to non-governmental organizations. • The 107 traffickers made a total of 2,824 trips to drop boxes during the 2020 Election, with a majority of visits occurring after 8:00 p.m. • In 2020 there was a surge of “indefinitely confined” votes in Wisconsin, resulting in 220,404 votes cast from individuals who were exempted from showing voter ID. This surge of suspect votes was due to Democrat election clerks giving advice that was deemed illegal after the election, instructing voters to identify themselves as disabled during the COVID pandemic to avoid voter ID laws. • Indefinitely confined voters, who are supposed to be physically unable to go to the polls due to age, disability, or illness, increased by an astounding 393 percent in Dane County from 2016 to 2020; 492 percent in Racine County; 281 percent in Milwaukee County; and 287 percent in the state overall. • There were just 56,978 indefinitely confined votes in 2016, and roughly 70,000 43 in 2019. In 2020, however, there were 220,404 votes cast using indefinite confinement status. Over 77 percent of these individuals had never been listed as indefinitely confined before. The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau identified 48,554 people who voted as indefinitely confined in November 2020 who had never provided photo identification or did not have photo identifications on file with clerks, which is more than twice the vote margin of 20,682. • Scott McDonell, the Democrat clerk of Dane County, which encompasses the area of Madison, told all residents they could identify themselves as indefinitely confined because of COVID, specifically citing it as a way to get around the Voter ID law. • McDonell previously blamed Wisconsin’s voter ID law for President Trump’s victory in 2016, claiming in a 2018 Twitter post that “thousands of voters [were] deterred from voting due to [the] ID law.” • In 2020, McDonell urged all voters to declare themselves indefinitely confined in order to obtain an absentee ballot and “skip the step of uploading an ID” in the April 2020 primary election. Once a voter is identified as indefinitely confined, they continue to receive absentee ballots automatically for subsequent elections. “I urge all voters who request a ballot and have trouble presenting a valid ID to indicate that they are indefinitely confined,” McDonell said in a Facebook post. • The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in December 2020 that the pandemic “did not render all Wisconsin electors ‘indefinitely confined,’ thereby obviating the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an absentee ballot,” and the clerks’ “interpretation of Wisconsin election laws was erroneous.” • The Wisconsin Election Commission ordered nursing homes to violate the law by not allowing Special Voting Deputies (SVDs) inside their facilities, which led to election fraud where incapacitated elderly residents had votes cast in their name with the assistance of nursing home staff. • An investigation by the Racine County Sheriff found the Wisconsin Elections Commission “shattered” state election laws. Nursing homes saw an “unusual surge in voting activity,” and at least 8 cases of felony voter fraud were found in one nursing home, accounting for nearly 1 in 5 families of residents. • The Wisconsin Election Commission admitted it was “essentially telling the clerks to break the law” by ordering the sending of absentee ballots to nursing homes and barring Special Voting Deputies inside the facilities. • An interim report released by Special Counsel Michael J. Gableman raised “serious and legitimate questions that the certification of Wisconsin’s election results may have been undertaken in an unlawful and unconstitutional manner.” • Gableman claimed “Democracy in the Park” events in Madison involved numerous possible violations of the law, “calling into question the validity of over 17,000 absentee ballots.” • These outdoor events to collect mail-in ballots were the subject of numerous complaints, and it is “not clear that all of the workers at those events were properly deputized and trained, swore and filed the mandatory oath of office, or documents related to absentee ballots were properly handled.” • The Office of the Special Counsel also claimed evidence of “undue influence by well-funded private groups, who leveraged large grants to certain Wisconsin cities in order to co-opt our election apparatus to their benefit.” • The report confirms at least 17.5 percent of election clerks “were not properly trained,” and that “exploitation of elders” occurred in nursing homes. • In one example, Maryl Barrett, who was 104 years old and did not recognize her own children, had a ballot cast in her name in the 2020 Presidential Election. • The Office of Special Counsel’s second interim report found nursing homes in Milwaukee, Dane, and Racine counties with 100 percent turnout due to the Wisconsin Election Commission’s order. • The special counsel said it possessed evidence of nursing home facility staff and directors who “assisted residents in completing ballots; assisted residents in obtaining absentee ballots; pressured residents to vote; collected completed ballots from residents; forged signatures of residents; illegally returned residents’ ballots to the municipal clerks by mail, by placing the ballots in drop boxes, and/ or delivering them directly to the clerks; pressured and/or assisted incompetent persons to complete and cast ballots in the November 2020 election, up to and including persons who have had their right to vote take away by court order due to mental incompetence.” • The second interim report also detailed an $8.8 million “election bribery scheme” involving Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life and the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay. “In the agreement, the Cities took CTCL’s money to facilitate in-person and absentee voting within their respective city.” • The “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan” developed for CTCL facilitated grants to major Wisconsin cities to deploy drop boxes for mail-in ballots, including $50,000 to Green Bay, $40,000 to Kenosha, $50,000 to Madison, $58,500 to Milwaukee, and $18,000 to Racine. • Whitney May, the director of government services for CTCL, posted numerous anti-Trump posts on social media, including telling people “don’t vote for Trump” in 2016. • Internal emails from election officials in Green Bay revealed Michael SpitzerRubenstein, a former Democratic Party operative, served as a “de facto elections administrator and had access to Green Bay’s absentee ballots days before the election.” • The Office of the Special Counsel referenced this case, and has evidence that this grantee, which was funded by CTCL, was “directly involved in all aspects of management of election officials, was entrusted with the only sets of physical keys to the city’s central count location, managed the transportation of ballots, and instructed the counting of unlawful ballots that had arrived at the central count location beyond the lawful time window.”

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States PENNSYLVANIA🚨 • Pennsylvania was called by 80,555 votes. • Months after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State. By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an election with this type of discrepancy. • Republican lawmakers, led by State Representative Frank Ryan, were tracking the vote discrepancy in real time in the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system. Ryan, a certified public accountant, initially reported that there were 170,830 more votes than voters in the Presidential race, more than twice the margin in Pennsylvania. “These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error,” the lawmakers said. • The Pennsylvania Department of State’s office called this “obvious misinformation,” while admitting the “only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories,” which they said Philadelphia, Allegheny, and other counties had still not completed — an admission the election was certified without ensuring the number of voters and votes matched in the SURE system. The election was certified on Nov. 24, 2020, and the Department of State’s statement came on Dec. 29, 2020. • The SURE system was checked and downloaded weekly with updated voter histories from the general Election until all the counties uploaded their vote histories, which was not completed until February 2021. At this time there were still over 121,000 votes that did not have a corresponding voter in the SURE system. • The statement by the Department of State “that the voting would reconcile, once the counties completed their SURE uploads, was incorrect,” according to Verity Vote. “When the final county finished uploading their voter histories and closed the election in SURE, it was February 1, 2021, which was the same day that [Secretary of State Kathy] Boockvar announced her resignation. At the time that Philadelphia closed the election in SURE, the voter histories showed that the county accepted at least 7,944 ballots that could not be associated with a registered voter.” • Pennsylvania credited 71,893 people for voting who returned mail-in ballots after Election Day, and these individuals were included in the voter history files. This includes 50,285 received between Nov. 4 and Nov. 6; 11,570 received between Nov. 7 and Nov. 11; and 10,038 that were received on or after Nov. 12. Boockvar claimed only 10,000 ballots were received between the close of the polls on Election Day and Nov. 6. • While 71,893 people received credit for voting by mail, these votes purportedly did not count. Even while including these voters in the total number of who participated in the Election, Pennsylvania still came up 121,240 voters short. • According to the Department of State data, there were 7,035,746 ballots cast in the 2020 Presidential Election, including all write-in votes, over-votes, and under-votes. “After all counties closed the election in SURE, only 6,914,556 voters were credited with participation in the 2020 General Election. This reveals a voter deficit of 121,240.” • In Philadelphia, hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were unlawfully counted in secret, in defiance of a court order, while Republican poll watchers were thrown out of buildings where voting took place. • U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain was told to stand down and not investigate election irregularities by Attorney General Bill Barr. McSwain said he was instructed to not discuss the allegations of voter fraud he received, and to pass any “serious” investigations along to then-State Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat who promised days before the election that President Trump “is going to lose.” • Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $25 million into the administration of the election in Pennsylvania in 2020. Over $10 million went to the Democrat-controlled jurisdiction of Philadelphia, which included $5.5 million on “ballot processing equipment” and $552,000 for drop boxes. • A lawsuit filed in Delaware County revealed video evidence of election officials discussing destroying election evidence from the November 2020 Election. “It’s a felony,” one official says after talking about the need to “get rid” of voting “pads and second scanners.” Sources involved in the litigation alleged the Delaware County officials violated numerous election laws and that the destruction of records was “done to ensure records eventually provided actually matched the election results that were reported in Nov. 2020.” • Delaware County received $2.2 million from Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which it spent on “recruiting and training a sufficient number of poll workers; setting up drop box locations for voters to return ballots,” and other Get Out the Vote efforts. • The election integrity group True the Vote said Philadelphia was the worst offender it witnessed when investigating the widespread ballot trafficking scheme operating across multiple Swing States in 2020. They identified 1,155 ballot traffickers who each visited at least 10 drop boxes and five non-governmental organizations. Some ballot traffickers made hundreds of trips to drop boxes.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States ARIZONA🚨 • Arizona was called by a margin of 10,457 votes. • Maricopa County accepted 20,500 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020, including 18,000 – more than the entire election margin – on Nov. 4 picked up from the U.S. Postal Service. By law, ballots must be received no later than 7 p.m. on Election Day, which was Nov. 3. • “The 20,000 ballots recorded as incoming from the USPS on and after November 4 were of sufficient quantity to change the result of the 2020 General Election in Arizona,” according to Verity Vote. • The findings were based on Maricopa County’s official Elections Department records, which were withheld from a public records request for nearly seven months. The records showed 18,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4; 1,000 received on Nov. 5; and 1,500 received on Nov. 6. • The 18,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4 and subsequently counted represented a significant spike in ballots received, higher than every single day total since Oct. 29, 2020. The receipt of mail-in ballots had steadily declined from 14,500 ballots on Oct. 29 to 10,500 on Oct. 30; 6,000 on Oct. 31; 1,500 on Nov. 1; 1,000 on Nov. 2; and 2,500 on Nov. 3. • In the 2020 General Election, 420,987 ballots failed signature verification standards, “thus the election was openly vulnerable to fraud,” according to an ongoing analysis conducted by We the People Arizona Alliance and presented to the state legislature. • The initial analysis of 380,976 ballots, using official state records and official signature verification training techniques, identified 181,378 ballots that should not have been counted, or nearly half of all reviewed. • This includes: 1,870 blank envelopes, some of which were approved on Nov. 5 and Nov. 8; 542 with a signature other than the voter; 2,104 scribbles; 128 duplicate voters processed; 48,117 unreasonably different control signatures; 1,875 where the signature did not match until after the election; 36,034 control signatures that do not match the voter; 4,433 unusable control signatures; 47,366 that failed Secretary of State standards; and 38,909 egregious signature mismatches, where not one point of a signature matched any on file. • In the case of the 1,875 votes, the ballot envelopes did not have a signature match on Election Day, but “matching” signatures were later put on file for the voter on either Jan. 28, 2021, Feb. 3, 2021, or Feb. 8, 2021. There were 783 signatures digitally inserted on Feb. 3, 2021 alone. • Since the findings were presented to the Arizona State Legislature, the number of egregious mismatches found has increased to 76,354, over seven times the election margin. This is an error rate of 9.30 percent of ballot envelopes reviewed. • Throughout the signature verification analysis, which remains ongoing, analysts have consistently found 20 percent do not meet the Secretary of State’s standards, and 9 percent are egregious violations. Extrapolated to all 1.9 million mail-in ballots in 2020, 176,700 ballots “should have been rejected for improper signature verification due to egregious signature mismatches.” • Maricopa County has no documented chain of custody for 740,000 ballots from the 2020 Election. • Out of the 923,000 early vote ballots accepted at vote centers or drop boxes, only 183,406 ballots are accounted for on ballot transport forms. More than 80 percent of the ballot transport forms have no ballot counts. • Without proper documentation of how many votes were cast at the time they were cast, it is impossible to verify the origin and true total of ballots in a given election. “Without this count, there is no way to determine if the transport staff retrieved one ballot or one thousand ballots,” according to Verity Vote. “Keeping a proper chain of custody is more than a best practice - it is essential to encouraging trust in our democracy,” according to the Election Assistance Commission. • Of the 1,895 early vote ballot transport forms, 48 did not have the required two witness signatures attesting to the ballot transfer, including some with no witness signatures at all. “As a result, the public is not assured that both parties witnessed the transfer of ballots,” as required. • Millions of files of 2020 General Election data and security logs were deleted from the Elections Management Server and purged on critical days, including the day before the Arizona audit of the 2020 Election began on Feb. 2, 2021. • The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors admitted they purged the system and moved election data after they received a subpoena, in testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives. • Two precincts in Pima County had over 100 percent turnout for mail-in ballots, and 40 precincts had over 97 percent returned. • The national mail-in ballot return rate was 71 percent, but in Pima County the mail-in ballot return rate was 15 percent higher, and 19 percent higher than all the counties combined in the entire state of Arizona. One precinct with 99.5 percent mail-in turnout had 9,812 ballots counted. Another precinct with 100.6 percent turnout had 2,182 ballots returned, but only 2,170 mail-ins were ever sent. These two precincts total 11,994 ballots, which alone is more than the margin needed to alter the outcome of the Presidential Election. • In all, there were 264,000 votes from precincts in Pima County with over 92 percent turnout for mail-in ballots. • Significant anomalies were discovered for mail-in ballot returns in Pima County. In precincts with anomalous high turnout of over 92 percent in Pima County, mail-in ballots started flipping from 6 percent Republican for Biden to 40 percent of Republicans voting for Biden. • The election integrity group True the Vote identified more than 202 ballot traffickers in Maricopa County who made 4,282 individual drop box visits during the 2020 General Election. • Two individuals were charged and plead guilty for ballot harvesting in Yuma County, Arizona during the 2020 primary election. • A computer scientist testified that an algorithm similar to what is used in cruise control or self-driving cars was present affecting the early votes in Pima and Maricopa counties in the 2020 General Election, with the ability to “reach and maintain a predetermined setpoint (outcome) despite unplanned disturbances.” • Walter C. Daugherity, a senior lecturer emeritus in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University who developed courses in artificial intelligence, expert systems, programming and software design, analyzed the Cast Vote Records, finding, “ballots in Maricopa County and Pima County were artificially processed through the tabulators tracking a ProportionalIntegral-Derivative (PID) type control function in a closed-loop feedback system.” • Daugherity, who has received over $2.8 million in grant funding and was previously consulted as a computer expert by the New York Times, Washington Post, IBM Federal Systems Division, the Texas Department of Agriculture, U.S. Customs Service, as well as classified work, discovered “significant and systematic decline in the cumulative ratio as counting progresses,” in the early mail-in and in-person votes for the Presidential Election results in Maricopa County and Pima County. • For example, the “first block of ballots being 75 [percent] for a candidate, the next block of ballots being 74 [percent] for a candidate, the next block of ballots being 73 [percent] for a candidate, and so on, systematically declining all the way to Election Day.” • Daugherity’s expert opinion is that the downward sloping line in the sequence that votes were recorded indicated a strong control. The cumulative ratio of Biden to Trump votes for all cast vote records before Election Day in recorded order for Pima County declines from over 300 percent to 157 percent by Election Day. • “Such a uniform and predictable pattern is so statistically implausible that it would not occur without artificial manipulation,” according to Daugherity. The data’s lack of independence cannot be explained by the preference of Democrats voting earlier than Republicans.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States MICHIGAN🚨 • Michigan was called by 154,188 votes. • A record 5,579,317 votes were cast and certified in Michigan in the 2020 General Election, the highest turnout in 60 years. To date, Michigan has never shown 5,579,317 voters listed for the 2020 Election in its Qualified Voter File, the state’s database for all voter registration records. • As of December 2023, Michigan has 271,566 more votes than the number of voters listed in its Qualified Voter File for Nov. 3, 2020, more than one and a half times the Election margin. • In data obtained from the Secretary of State’s office on nearly a monthly basis since the Election, the most voters ever recorded in the Qualified Voter File was 5,511,303 voters in April 2021. This means Michigan’s own election records showed 68,014 more votes than voters. However, the number of voters listed in the Qualified Voter File has been in flux ever since December 2020, and always short of the voters needed to reconcile the total votes cast. A complete list of voters from 2020 has never been provided. • The number of voter IDs listed as voting in 2020 has steadily declined since February 2022. As of December 2023, there was a total of 5,307,751 voters listed as voting on Nov. 3, 2020 in the Qualified Voter File. Voter history files continue to be removed from the record, resulting in 271,566 less vote history records than necessary to reconcile the results. • Each month voter histories from the 2020 Election are being manipulated. Thousands of unique votes are removed from the voter history files, and other unique votes added. Since December 2020, 270,559 voter histories for 2020 have been removed, while 103,128 have been added. • Individual voter histories are constantly changing, including the history of the state’s Democrat Governor Gretchen Whitmer, whose voting history is missing votes throughout 2020. • A complete list of voters was requested via a Freedom of Information Act request in December 2021 and took nine months for the state to fulfill. Two datasets were provided, and neither matched. The first dataset fell 22,146 voters short, while the second dataset was 120,883 absentee ballots short. • Democrats threatened Republicans on the Wayne County Board of Canvassers and doxxed children in order to certify the 2020 results. Monica Palmer, then the chair of the Wayne County Board of Supervisors, cited the fact that 70 percent of Detroit’s mail-in ballot counts were still “out of balance and unexplained” from the August primary as a reason why she initially voted against certifying the 2020 Election results. Palmer was “bullied and threatened” and “feared for her safety” due to threats she received for voting no. A Democrat Michigan State representative-elect attacked Palmer over her certification vote, and revealed where her children went to school, saying, “I want you to think about what that means for your kids.” • Officials in Detroit illegally blocked Republican poll challengers’ access, covered the windows, called the cops, and denied lawful challenges in order to count ballots in secret. • Affidavits and video evidence revealed thousands of ballots were delivered through a back door of the TCF center, the central counting facility in Detroit, at 3:30 a.m. on Election night. • A report seeking to “debunk” issues of fraud released by the Michigan State Senate Oversight Committee confirmed a “large volume” of ballots were delivered to the TCF center with no chain of custody in the middle of the night. • An estimated 289,866 absentee ballots were identified as sent to people who never requested them, “something that would be illegal,” according to the senate committee. • Mark Zuckerberg gave Michigan $16.8 million through his nonprofit Center for Tech and Civic Life. • Detroit received $7.4 million to “dramatically” expand the vote for Democrats. The grants financed drop boxes “to facilitate the return of absentee ballots,” like the ones that came in the TCF center after midnight. • The election integrity group True the Vote uncovered the same pattern of widespread ballot trafficking between NGOs and ballot drop boxes in Michigan. Numerous instances of ballot stuffing were caught on camera in Detroit, including video where a woman can be seen going to a drop box, and abruptly returning to her car after realizing the stack had no signatures. The woman then signs the ballots, and deposits the illicit ballots she had just signed into the drop box. • Secretary Jocelyn Benson made unlawful changes to signature verification rules for absentee ballots, ordering election workers to presume all were legitimate. A judge ruled Benson’s order was invalid, but not until months following the election, and just 0.1 percent of mail-in ballots were rejected in the November 2020 Election for all signature issues. The rejection rate for mismatching signatures was just 0.04 percent, as only 1,400 out of 3.4 million ballots were rejected. • Secretary Benson has lost in court six times for issues related to the 2020 Election. • A fraudulent voter registration scheme was discovered in October 2020 and documented in a police report in Muskegon County and hidden for nearly 3 years after the 2020 Election. • A city clerk in Muskegon witnessed a woman drop off between 8,000 and 10,000 voter registrations at the clerk office on Oct. 8, 2020, many appearing to be fraudulent. The incident was reported it to the Muskegon Police Department one week later. Eight thousand new voter registrations in Muskegon would amount to over 20 percent of the city’s population of only 38,000 residents. • An ensuing investigation confirmed thousands of voter registrations in the same handwriting and many invalid or non-existent addresses. The suspect told Michigan State Police that she was being paid $1,150 per week to “find unregistered voters and provide them with a form so they can get registered to vote or obtain their absentee ballot.” The police found “dozens of new phones” and “hundreds of pre-paid payment cards” during the investigation. • A Department of State analyst consulted in the investigation confirmed a quantity of voter applications were “clearly fraudulent” and others were “highly suspicious having either erroneous or are missing key pieces of information.” Others appeared to be legitimate. • The organization behind the scheme was GBI Strategies, a firm hired by numerous Democrat campaigns. GBI Strategies was funded by a super PAC called “Black PAC,” which paid the firm $11,254,919 to register voters for Joe Biden in 2020. Employees of GBI Strategies were paid $15 an hour or $120 a day, according to the police report. • GBI Strategies was believed to be operating not just in Muskegon, but throughout Michigan and in other Swing States. • Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office contacted the Muskegon Police Department and asked Michigan State Police to assist with a joint investigation. The Michigan police then turned their investigation over to the FBI. • Andrew Kloster, deputy general counsel at the United States Office of Personnel Management during the Trump Administration, said he was made aware of the investigation into GBI Strategies before the 2020 Election and attempted to raise the issue for further investigation. He was informed there were “standing orders not to deal with election matters” in the offices of the White House counsel office and Attorney General Bill Barr. • The investigation was not made public until 2023, after the police reports were obtained through a Michigan Freedom of Information Act request.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States I look forward to fact-checkers debunking this, citing sources from the corporate media that spent four years claiming Donald Trump was a Russian agent and dismissing Hunter Biden's laptop as Russian disinformation. I encourage you to personally review the numerous citations in this report and reach your own conclusions. https://cdn.nucleusfiles.com/e0/e04e630c-63ff-4bdb-9652-e0be3598b5d4/summary20of20election20fraud20in20the20swing20states.pdf

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 3:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A network of radical Marxist bureaucrats conspired in secret meetings to use their positions in the US Government to enact their political agenda. The participants included far-left protest organizers, federal bureaucrats, and even a trans porn star turned protest activist. They discussed tactics such as leaking information, wearing symbols, and creating parallel structures. They also expressed concerns over Schedule F and planned to reject Trump's appointees if he contested the election. Internal documents distributed during the meeting provided resources for federal worker activism and evidence of their involvement in leaks. They also discussed grassroots election protection strategies, including voter registration, printing ballots, and counting/recounting ballots.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Thread: 1. Far-Left US Government Employees Conspired To Subvert President Trump, Gum Up Bureaucratic Processes, Strike, and Leak To The Media A network of radical marxist bureaucrats conspired in secret meetings, plotting how to use their official positions inside the US Government to enact their political agenda.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Days before the 2020 election, a secret Zoom meeting titled "Feds For Democracy" took place between a group of subversive Marxists inside the US federal government w/ far-left protest organizations. Hosted by "Democracy Kitchen" and "Feds For Democracy" and in participation w/ leftist affinity groups, like ShutDownDC.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

3. At its peak, about 150 participants were on the call. The Hosts & Speakers: https://t.co/jI5paE1DUy

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

4. Participants backgrounds ranged from being far-left protest organizers, green energy corporate employees to federal bureaucrats, Air Force Lt. Col., National Security advisors, and those who worked in White House during the Obama Administration. And even a trans porn star turned protest activist. Participants Identified:

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

5. Secrecy "What's learned in the room can leave with you, but what is said in the room stays in the room." Participants are advised to "take those discussions offline" if they what to talk about high risk actions they want to take. https://t.co/t594FjgJFC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Please only share information about yourself that you're comfortable with. You can keep your camera muted and introduce yourself in a way that makes you feel at ease. When discussing potential actions, it's best to speak hypothetically to avoid any misunderstandings. If you want to discuss specific actions or higher-risk topics, exchange contact information and use the secure messaging app Signal to communicate privately. This will ensure that sensitive information remains confidential.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a couple of notes on your own safety and the safety of others that you are working with, tonight, Please disclose only as much information about yourself as you're comfortable with. As I mentioned earlier, feel free to keep your camera muted. Feel free to change your your name when you're introducing yourself in breakout. Use your name if you want, your agency or department if you want, or Talk about what your favorite meal is. Find a way to introduce yourself that you're comfortable with. If you're talking about, actions that you might take yourself. I encourage folks to speak hypothetically. If someone were considering doing x, What what might the problems be? That way, there's no implication that that's actually something that you've said you're going to do. Just keep things hypothetical. And then if there's a discussion emerges, especially in the breakout group, of some very specific actions that you wanna take or something that might be higher risk for people in your group, definitely, get each other's contact information and form a signal group to talk about that. Signal's an app that's very secure end to end encryption. It's a good way to communicate about anything that you wouldn't want to get out, that might get you in trouble with your boss. So take take those discussions offline, there'll be a chance at the end of the breakouts to exchange contact information with each.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

6. Icebreaker "Chat Storm " "A lot of folks looking for solidarity, camaraderie, hope, protection, like-minded people." -Laura Adams

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

7. The Election Is At Risk "..there will likely be disagreements about which ballots should be thrown away and for what reason" https://t.co/3qrdxsHCYf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the risks surrounding the upcoming election. They highlight Donald Trump's refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power and his fear mongering about mail-in ballots. The speaker mentions that the election results may not be finalized on November 3rd, leading to potential disagreements and court cases. They emphasize the importance of taking Trump's statements seriously, particularly his comments about getting rid of ballots and questioning their manipulation. The speaker concludes by mentioning the significance of believing authoritarian figures when they make statements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So a high level issue. The election is at risk. This is due to a number of factors. Donald Trump has not committed to a peaceful transfer of power. Instead, there's been significant fear mongering about risks associated mail in ballots, which has been rampant. The election results are unlikely to be finalized on November 3rd, which is perhaps different than what we're used to in previous years. There will likely be disagreements about which ballots should be thrown away and for what reason. We've seen lots of, court cases happening in this in many swing states around the country, and there's a chance that certain decisions around the election will take place in the courts. So there's a lot going on right now, and As we're all aware, the election is now less than a week away. So next slide. So, I wanted to pull out a few quotes, of what Donald Trump has said on the election. I think It's important to, listen to what these leaders are actually saying and to take them seriously. One of The biggest risks I think we have is to assume people are joking or or speaking in a way that is not serious for them, but We saw in September, Donald Trump saying that, he's complaining about the ballots. The ballots are a disaster. Get rid of the ballots, and you'll have a very peaceful there won't be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation. And if it's a fair election, he's on board. But, if He sees that ballots are being manipulated. I can't go along with that, and that means you have a fraudulent election. And this is really just setting up the ideas around, well, who who is saying ballots are manipulated and in web ways. And there's a quote that maybe one of the next speakers will talk about where, when an authoritarian says something, you should believe them, and I think that's important here.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

8. Thwarting A Coup Isn't A Coup "It is not a coup to act against a government or officials who are trying to prevent a legitimate transfer of power. We believe that every vote must count, we must count every vote" https://t.co/41XtkKQlpz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Refusing to honor the results of a fair election is a coup, but acting against a government that hinders a legitimate transfer of power is not. Every vote should be counted, and we must protect democracy. It's crucial to focus on what we know is right amidst different narratives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Speaking of coups, I also wanna, be upfront that, it is a coup to refuse to honor the results of a free and fair election. It is not a coup to act against a government or officials who are trying to prevent a legitimate transfer of power. We believe that every vote must count, we must count every vote, and we must take action to protect democracy. Forwarding a coup is not the same thing as a coup. It's protecting democracy. There's going to be a lot of narratives around what is happening, what should be happening, what do things mean and I think it's really important to be centered in what any of us know is right. Next slide. So I know that's a lot upfront, but really important to, make sure we're on the same page on. So I wanna also

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

9. We Have Power & Responsibility "We have power and responsibility as federal workers... rules have meaning because we decide they do, we decide to enforce them." - Maddy Salzman https://t.co/UV90qzim8j

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

10. Tactics Depend On Your Role "One important aspect is to think about what are the tactics you should take depending on your role. There's different types of roles in the federal government, and that means that there's different roles that could be appropriate for you to take" https://t.co/BDx7l9zLp1

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

11. Ideas For Fed Organizing "We should continue conversations on direct action and how we can stand in solidarity with others, especially protestors in other communities."

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

12. Maria Stephan "It is really great to be with you all in solidarity during this critical junction for our country." -Maria Stephan "I have worked in the US government. I worked in the State Department for over five years." -Maria Stephan

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

13. Quoting Gene Sharp "I want to start with this quote by Gene Sharp, who's one of the pioneers in the field of nonviolent action, just to get a little bit on what power you all have as individuals and as federal workers." - Maria Stephan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gene Sharp, a pioneer in nonviolent action, highlights the power individuals and federal workers possess. Rulers rely on people to collect taxes, enforce laws, manage transportation, allocate funds, and perform various tasks. If people refuse to provide these services, rulers would lose their ability to govern. President Harry S. Truman acknowledged the influence of bureaucrats, stating that he couldn't accomplish anything without them. This emphasizes that both ordinary people and federal workers hold significant power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna start with this, quote by, Gene Sharp, who's one of the pioneers in the field of nonviolent action. Just to get a little bit at what power you all have, as individuals and as federal workers. So Gene Sharp said, in the politics of non violent action by themselves. Rulers cannot collect taxes, enforce repressive laws and regulations, keep trains running on time, prepare national budgets, direct traffic, manage ports, print money, repair roads, keep markets supplied with food, make steal, build rockets, train the police and the army, issue postage stamps, or even milk a cow. People provide these services to the ruler through a variety of organizations and institutions. If people would stop providing these skills the ruler could not rule. And just as an added insight on this specifically focused on bureaucrats. President Harry s Truman famously said, I thought I was the president, but when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing. So the bottom line with this is that We all as ordinary people, and as federal workers have power. Next slide, Laura.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

14. Gene Sharp - How To Start a Revolution "This is a technique of combat, it is a substitute for war and other violence. https://t.co/NhcnEosnVb

Video Transcript AI Summary
This combat technique is a non-violent alternative to war. It has been translated into over 30 languages and is practiced on all continents except Antarctica.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a technique of combat. It is a substitute for war and other violence. We don't know quite how it's read, but it certainly did into Thirty some languages in different parts of the world on all continents except Antarctica.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

15. Subverting the "Pillars Of Support" "If people in these pillars of support withhold or deny their consent and cooperation...no ruler can stay in power.." https://t.co/LldEvI15hf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Power is dispersed in society and concentrated in pillars of support, which are organizations and institutions that provide the necessary resources for those in power to stay in power. These pillars consist of ordinary people who contribute expertise, labor, and buying power. If people in these pillars withhold their cooperation and engage in nonviolent tactics like protests and strikes, rulers cannot maintain power, as seen in cases like the Philippines, Serbia, Ukraine, and Sudan. The loyalty of individuals within these pillars varies, with those closer to the center being more obedient. The goal of effective people power is to shift loyalties and bring people from the center to the outside. Bureaucracy is a powerful pillar, with federal workers having knowledge and influence over policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So power is actually dispersed across society and concentrated in what we refer to as pillars of support. So these are organizations and institutions that provide a government or other power holder with the power, with the skills, the knowledge, the labor, the know how that they need, to stay in power. And these pillars of support are made up of ordinary people like you and me who provide Expertise who provide specific forms of labor, who provide buying power. So if people in these pillars of support Withhold or deny their consent in cooperation. Meaning, they stop obeying, they stop cooperating, And they engage in protests, boycotts, strikes, a whole host of other nonviolent tactics That if masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power, even if they really want to, and even if they use a lot of repression. And, ultimately, this is how civil resistance has removed even dictators from Power in places like the Philippines, Serbia, Ukraine, Sudan, other places around the world. And the other idea is that within these pillars of support, You can think of it as kind of a series of concentric rings. And, you know, at the center is kind of the power holder And people who are, you know, in the rings around the power holder have varying degrees of loyalty to the center. So, you know, those who are maybe closer to the center and this uses the example of, you know, the the military kind of starting with generals and going out colonels, foot soldiers, but you think can think about this in terms of the bureaucracy as well, kind of going through the different hierarchy, That the people who are maybe closest to the center are more likely to obey, less likely to challenge authority. But as you go out, to those outer rings, people are going to have less loyalty, to to the center, to the power holder. And these people are really key allies. And ultimately, you know, the goal, in, you know, in effective People power is to bring people over to your side, to get them to shift loyalties, to get them to move from the center to the outside. And as we know and as Maddie, you know, laid out so nicely, bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar. And, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process. They know how to speed things up. They know how to slow them down. They have access to critical information about policies that are being considered and implemented. They can participate in an internal decision making. They can provide or deny knowledge and expertise that those, At the top of the bureaucratic, totem pole meet

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

16. Acts of Commission and Omission "And another act of commission, albeit highly risky, and there are a number of great downsides, is leaking"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Acts of commission in opposing threats to democracy include asking specific questions, wearing symbols of unity, creating a paper trail, leaking information selectively, and forming self-organizing units. Acts of omission involve refusing loyalty oaths, promoting internal debate, and slowing down work. A labor strike or walkout is a higher-risk option. These actions aim to challenge unethical or unconstitutional orders and protect the integrity of elections. It is important to exercise caution and consider potential legal consequences when engaging in these acts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission. So acts of commission are things that you do that you either are not expected to do or that are contrary to, you know, what the opponent, in this case, the enemies of democracy, want you to do. So in this case, you know, an act of commission would be, you know, as federal workers asking very specific questions, exerting your voice in the workplace, joining with colleagues to make the case for why something may be illegal or unethical. Another act of commission is the wearing of symbols which seems like, you know, a small or a minor thing but it's actually really powerful When lots of people are showing unity and solidarity by wearing symbols, symbols can be nonpartisan. They can be pro democracy And part of me thinks that symbols may be an important way for feds to show support and solidarity around democracy and the integrity of our election after, November 3rd. Another act of commission is creating a paper trail. So producing a very clearly written account of the problem in question and the actions, that are taken to address it. And this is really, I think in this moment where there may be uncertainty conflicting messaging potentially illegal orders for civil servants federal workers to engage meticulous documentation, to challenge the policies or the directives that they deem unethical or unconstitutional particularly when the orders are given verbally rather than in written form. And another act of commission albeit highly, you know risky and there are a number of great downsides is leaking. So leaking information about pending or actual policies with journalists, with activists, influential people on the outside. But this, you know, really should be used very judiciously only on truly significant matters because most disclosures outside of formal internal whistleblower are at minimum a violation of contractual duty, and they may put leakers, at significant legal risk. And, of course, if information is classified, employees can be fired or criminally prosecuted as Sarah may talk a little bit about. So another act of, of commission is creating parallel structures or self organizing units. So organizing in the office place, in the workplace. This is particularly important, in the event of abuses of power unethical activity to be able to self organize, make decisions without obeying or legitimizing certain decisions that are made. So in terms of acts of omission, meaning things that you excited that you don't do, that you're expected to do, or that you're being asked to do. First is, you know, rejecting loyalty oaths, you know, being called upon to swear a loyalty oath, you know, around a candidate and individual, particularly when the outcome of the election is still, in doubt, very important thing. And to foster frank internal debate and transparency with outside stakeholders whenever possible. Another act of omission is going slow or slow down. So, basically, people, bureaucrats, federal workers performing their duties, at a foot dragging pace, which is less likely to attract attention than an overt strike, and has been used in a number of different cases. And then, you know, another higher risk, effort would be a labor strike or a walkout, would likely be illegal, but it's kind of, a high risk, high impact, a nonviolent action that federal workers can take, if they deem it necessary.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

17. Acts of Commission - Tactics for Federal Workers -Ask Questions -Wearing Symbols -Create a paper trail -Leaking (high risk) -Create Parallel Structures/Self-Organizing Units

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

18. Feds For BLM (Wearing Symbols) "I'm wearing a shirt that I think is acceptable under the Hatch Act. Vote like Black Lives Matter. I would wear something like this and I think you'd be okay wearing that on the job." -Sarah Starrett https://t.co/hfbR5vtR7a

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

19. Leak Everything You Can "..everyone who works in the federal government, if you read the mainstream press, like who is covering your agency, who is working for @propublica , who is working for @politico . They all have signal accounts. Text them, leak everything you can." https://t.co/90yVbpWZnl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker advises federal government employees to leak information to journalists from mainstream press outlets like ProPublica and Politico. They suggest using Signal to communicate and recommend saving emails and recording meetings. The speaker also suggests writing poorly to make the administration look bad. Whistleblower protections are discussed, and the speaker acknowledges the risk involved in their actions. They mention the possibility of finding another job and suggest passing on information to a colleague with a higher risk threshold. The importance of finding ethical journalists who will protect sources is emphasized.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I Speaker 1: I just recommend everyone who works in the federal government, if you read the mainstream press, like, who is covering your agency? Who is working for ProPublica? Who is working for Politico? They all have signal accounts. Text them, leak everything you can, save your emails, record I record these meetings. I send it over. Like and I can't believe I'm showing my face here, but I've been doing this for months. And if you do have to write something, write something with really crappy, you know, just unintelligible, ungrammatical language to just make them look Terrible. And it will look like something that comes from this administration anyway. But Speaker 0: and to your first point, I know we talked a little bit about Whistleblower protections. Do you have any sense of, like, what is and isn't, covered when you're kind of, like, linking things to a place like ProPublica over Signal or anything like that? Speaker 1: I I mean, again and I sort of prefaced it. Was like, I don't anticipate keeping the job for too long. So, I'm I'm just taking a risk, and I just believe in it, and I don't really care about the job anymore, which is terrible because I don't know what I'm gonna do without it. But I just figure I'll get another job. Speaker 0: Yeah. And I think that's definitely an important thing to think about, like, your own risk level. And if you're in a place where you're like, So be it, and taking that level for us is Speaker 1: The other thing is not everyone's in that position like me where I feel confident about, like, going back on the hunt for your job. You may have a colleague though who has a higher risk threshold than you do. So there's a way that you can pass on that information and that they're willing to be the front for it. Again, The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Meaning to be the source of the leaks. So just get to find out who those and most most respectable journalists do that. They try and shield their sources because that's Their their bread and butter that they give them the stories, so they don't wanna throw you under the bus or screw you.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

20. Acts Of Omission - Tactics for Federal Workers -Go Slow -Strike or Walkout (Illegal)

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

21. A Combination of Tactics "I understand that it's important to refuse to " let the trains run on time", for those who aren't able to strike. What would that look like in practical terms?" https://t.co/6LkaGz3oj1

Video Transcript AI Summary
To slow down operations and prevent strikes, the Department of Labor conducts multiple rounds of cost-benefit analysis for new regulations. If cheating on the numbers is suspected, leaked drafts are sent to the Office of Inspector General for investigation. This coordinated effort effectively stops the process. Strikes are considered a last resort, and alternative tactics include go-slow methods and showing solidarity with federal workers. The fear of being fired, as seen during the Reagan administration, discourages federal employees from taking action. However, partnerships with powerful unions in the private sector can provide support and help resolve issues. During the recent government shutdown, the air traffic controllers' issues influenced the unions in the airline industry, contributing to reopening the government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To refuse the, quote, let the trains run on time for those who aren't able to strike, what would that look like in practical terms? What does it look like in practical terms to put, you know, to slow the gears down in some ways or another? Speaker 1: At at the Department of Labor, it it takes the form of, Several rounds of the cost benefit analysis for a new regulation. And when, when the numbers were when people were cheating on the numbers, a copy of that draft got leaked, to the data labor report and it got published and it got sent to a congressperson And the office of inspector general opened an investigation on who was cheating on the numbers. So again, that's sort of a combination of tactics. It's it's It's making really the paper trail. It's making sure that that document got out to someone who could make use of it and then congress getting the office of inspector general involved. It's It was really a way to stop that thing just in its tracks, and it it worked really well. But it was a coordinated effort by a lot of people. Speaker 0: Yeah. Absolutely. And, Maria, do you want to add to this? Speaker 2: Yeah. No. And, you know, the thing about strikes, I I completely agree with where Sarah was coming from. That strike is, kind of the worst option. I laid it out as an option just because it's, you know, it's there. It's available. It's kind of your conscience is, you know, past The point of no return, if you will. But I you know, there are definitely a lot of different go slow tactics. And I think, you know, this is also an area They're, you know, folks on the outside, so private citizens, those, in groups on the outside being able to show, solidarity with federal workers and And, you know, civil servants is particularly important during this moment, just to tell them, like, you've got, We've got your back on the outside. Do the right thing. Be ethical. Serve well. And I think we don't often think about that in the protest category, but, like, Incentivizing, folks doing the right thing, and having that be loud and clear is, you know, just, another another option. Speaker 3: Yeah. I'll add on to that, some information that, frankly, I've learned from other people who are attending this call, that, You know, there's obviously a history of, air traffic controllers, striking in the past and getting fired for that Under the Reagan administration, and I think that has kind of held through as, not just an actual barrier to Striking, but also, do makes federal employees deeply fearful of, action they can take. But I also in the most recent government shutdown, I think there was a really strong relationship between the air traffic controllers, even though they did not Strike at any point, the issues that they pose to the unions in the airline industry that ended up playing a Usual in helping get the government back open. So I think having those partnerships with other, organizations, Powerful unions in the private sector that, can have our backs and vice versa will be really important. Speaker 0: Great. Thank you So much for everyone. For our 3 speakers and for folks asking, really wonderful, questions to extrapolate on. Right, in the note somebody said, fed flu struck many TSA and air controllers threatening to shut down airports. That is a particular, thing that we can all catch this winter?

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

22. Inside Outside Strategy "The importance of self organizing with colleagues from within the same bureau and across government agencies...connecting with civic groups and organizations on the outside" https://t.co/CkbWZy6AC7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Federal workers are encouraged to self-organize with colleagues within their bureau and across government agencies to build trust and navigate challenges together. They should also connect with civic groups and have open conversations with them. Legal support and advocacy from civil society organizations can be helpful if they need to take action. Contributing their knowledge and skills to civic groups can be beneficial. It is important to stay in communication with grassroots groups and be prepared in case of a stolen election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Being able to think about what you can do, as federal workers and seeing the relationship between those actions and what is happening outside the federal workplace. So really the importance of self organizing with colleagues from within the same bureau and across government agencies, which can help build trust and confidence as federal workers are having to navigate a really difficult terrain together, connecting with civic groups and organizations on the outside and having frank and honest conversations with them. And when you think about it, the legal support and advocacy work of civil society organizations could come in really in handy, you know, if and when you have to take certain actions on the inside. And then, you know, contributing as private citizens, knowledge, skills, expertise to civic groups, organizations that would benefit from them tremendously. And just remaining in communication with those groups that, you know, in a grassroots way or organizing preparing people, in the event that there is a stolen election. Learn what

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

23. Trump's Schedule F Executive Order The group of federal workers express their concerns over Schedule F possibly being enacted in Jan 2021. Schedule F would've required loyalty to the President. https://t.co/noS9LrjKCb

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

24. What If Trump Wins? "I'm putting my head in the sand on that one. I refuse to accept the possibility." -Sarah Starrett https://t.co/ngzMcuNuhd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the importance of creating spaces for people to connect and have conversations. They encourage individuals to reach out to colleagues for information and support. They also address a question about mentioning the possibility of a change in administration as part of one's job, stating that it is not illegal but should be framed as a policy question. They emphasize the need to consider all aspects of a problem to avoid arbitrary and capricious decision-making. The topic of preparing for a scenario where Trump refuses to accept defeat is brought up, with one panelist admitting fear of him outright winning but refusing to accept the possibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're not sure you have colleagues that you trust to talk to, that's one of the reasons of having this conversation. We wanna start having spaces for people to connect, and so maybe you'll meet somebody through this space that works at your agency that maybe has more information or talk to somebody at a different agency who maybe has awareness of what it's like where you are. So, we wanna help facilitate conversation even if you're not sure who to turn 2 at work. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's great. So I'm gonna go back to another, question I saw. I have a job that includes offering informed judgment on different matters And mentioning that there's a possible change of administration, and we need to consider that possibility would be considered a normal part of my job. I can see some political appointees reacting badly to that, but it's not against the rules if it's framed in that context. Does anybody wanna come there was also a comment about how, People might stay away from that, because political appointees would react badly, but, is there any is there anything illegal about it? Is there a problem with that? Any comments? Speaker 2: I don't think it's illegal. You're just you're just raising a policy question. I mean, one one of the things that we deal with all the time is if we do this, will we get sued? You know, who will sue us and what will be the arguments that they make? So we we have to try to make sure what we do is not arbitrary and capricious. And so if we fail to consider all the aspects of a problem, it's arbitrary and capricious. You know, so that's part of the job is just sort of calculate what's going on and react, you know, offer options anyway to react to it. Speaker 1: Great. Excellent. So there's a bigger question, and, maybe we wanna talk about that in the in relation to the topic of the night of wild federal workers about I understand the emphasis on preparing for a scenario where Trump refuses to accept the defeat, but I'm honestly more afraid of him just outright winning. How do we prepare for that? Anybody, any one of our, panelists? Maria, Maddie, Sarah, wanna take this? Speaker 2: I'm putting my head in the sand on that one. I refuse to accept the possibility.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

25. Calling It A Coup. While discussing scenarios, federal bureaucrats plan to name Trump contesting the election as a Coup. They plan to reject Trump's appointees and only assist Biden's Transition Team. https://t.co/cOE3mBHVxx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the importance of using the term "coup" to describe the current situation. They question whether they should listen to political appointees if they are not legitimate. They mention the need for a transition team if Biden wins, as they did during the previous transition. They express concerns about conflicting narratives regarding the transition and discuss the responsibilities of issuing visitor badges and granting IT access. They mention the challenges of starting work without physical access to the building. They also mention the possibility of choosing the leader based on their understanding of who won the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think making sure that we're naming what is happening as a coup Mhmm. Language, and communications with coworkers will be really important. Speaker 1: Yeah. Totally agreed. In the at the NBC conversations that I've been having that's not on the federal We, also are often saying, like, call it a coup. It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not. Because the more you normalize that language, the more, it's like it becomes apparent. It's like most centrist folks in in the government might start actually accepting that. Speaker 0: Yeah. And I think, you know, I work on a project where I'm interacting on a daily basis with our politicals, and starting to call into question if we're in the midst of a coup, should we even be listening to our politicals because they are not here legitimately anymore. Speaker 2: That's a great question to be asking. Speaker 3: That said, I know that, you know, we if there's a Biden win next week, there's gonna be a transition team coming in, and, I think I'm gonna be spending a lot of Time working with them because I know, and I was around during the last transition. Like, we spent a lot of time preparing those briefing books, and we are not doing that this time. That is not A priority. And so a lot of that work is gonna have to be done sometime. I mean, the last time we spent about 6 months preparing a big fat briefing book. That's gonna all have to start all that work's gonna probably happen next week. Not that there was that much achieved policy wise these last 4 years. But I don't know if it's naive to say, but I'm gonna kind of, like, look like, I'm gonna have to shut out the current political appointees and go to the transition team and be like, this is you know, I'm looking ahead to the future. This is this is our work. So, you know, I hate to think that they are gonna be our saviors or something, but, Speaker 2: Can I Ask another nitty gritty question related to that? So say you have 2 narratives happening simultaneously. There's the existing Trump appointees saying there is no transition team because there's no transition. It's a continuation. Then you have Trump's side or Biden's side saying, I won, and my team is coming to the doors. Like, what are what are the responsibilities of the various people in your see to issue a visitor badge and physically let someone into the building and give them IT access and set up the meeting. Speaker 0: Yeah, I mean, I was gonna say, like, yes. They do need computers and stuff, but, like, right now, there are no doors. Like, how do you get done the Zoom logins, or how do you start Mhmm. You know We Speaker 3: can make those Terminations ourselves. We you know, they say you're gonna keep your account, and we're gonna start, and we're like I don't know. We're like the Lithuanian government in exile or something. We're gonna and then we're gonna start working with them. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I think it's almost, like, Definitely a risk factor, but if if there's a contested election and it's fairly clear to us who won, We we get to choose who the leader is, and I don't know what risk that puts on you, and and I'm not a fed again, so I don't wanna, like, In a weird situation, but, like, I think that is a point where you and your team and your supervisors and those, non appointee, like, I'm sorry. What's the the term? Career career staff can actually decide, like, well, according to our understanding, Biden won, and therefore, we are listening to his appointees and his transition team.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Break-Out Room Topics: 3 Scenarios "All scenarios assume in the week after the election either there is no clear winner or that Trump is denying that he lost." https://t.co/6agTnGTUaj

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Facilitators Guide For Federal Employee Activism Workshop This guide was distributed inside the groups "Movement Resources", an internal document hub. https://t.co/CPlJU4HxPJ

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

28. Affinity Groups - Role of Facilitators This internal document explains how affinity groups can operate together in clusters and the roles within. https://t.co/Gd4cRU2XXT

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

29. Activism Resources For Federal Workers Guide This internal document was distributed as the meeting ended. It's a tactical guide for federal workers on subverting the government from within. https://t.co/BdddtzJoZx

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

30. Subverting Trump From The Jump Doc. titled "Federal Service Articles" was linked inside the "Activism Resources for Federal Workers Guide". It evidences that this network, of subversive bureaucrats, was behind the leaks that plagued the Trump admin and were plotting subversion before Trump was even inaugurated. @propublica leaks.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

31. Stolen Election Action and Campaign A document titled "Grass Roots Emergency Election Protection Trifecta Action Guide" By Harvey Wasserman was inside their "Movement Resources" along with many other election related resources.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

32. Grass Roots Emergency Election Protection Trifecta Action Guide "The 2020 election is not likely to be cancelled or postponed. But it CAN be sabotaged or stolen. It will not be enough this year merely to register and vote. Nowhere near...join election boards, become poll workers and poll watchers, and more."

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

33. Pressure Points https://t.co/p19HRNqn83

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

34. Voter Registration "The first "leg" of the election trifecta is to register new voters, protect those now on the rolls, and restore those who've been purged." https://t.co/h9KuVI6gTs

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

35. Printing Ballots "Paper ballots must first be designed, printed, and published. Simple typos and deliberate manipulations can destroy elections." https://t.co/c5FYwpJVRO

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

36. Vote-By-Mail Mail-in ballots mass harvested and put in drop boxes. https://t.co/eIe3LGvNww

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

37. Chain of Custody "Tens of millions of paper VBM ballots will arrive at election boards" https://t.co/bn6Kfhz6tc

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

38. Election Protection At Voting Centers https://t.co/29LUSvTifT

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

39. The Ballot Acceptance Choke Point "In 2020, grassroots election protectionists must be embedded at the critical juncture of this decision-making process. In a massive VBM deployment, literally millions of ballots will arrive with small glitches, errors.." https://t.co/VOypcJpWQK

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

40. Counting & Recounting Ballots "In Ohio 2004, a federally mandated recount failed when official records from 56 of Ohios 88 counties "disappeared". https://t.co/LzlBk53Gjp

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

41. How to become an Election Protectionist https://t.co/tarbaap7Rk

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

42. Elections Admin State Of Play (8.18.20) Doc. shared in the groups "Movement Resources" outlining mail-in ballot margins in swing states, status on ballot drop boxes, mobile voting, vote-by-mail rejection rates, projected provisionals and election laws/litigation status. https://t.co/IQYETRvNzR

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

44. Interactive Map of Swing States Doc found inside "Movement Resources" and credited to Patrick Young, Shut Down DC leader. https://t.co/wywIAifiy7

Saved - February 3, 2024 at 6:54 PM

@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama

How to steal an election… Many of them.. https://t.co/Zy6QyIL7wP

Video Transcript AI Summary
A computer science professor explains how a voting machine can be easily manipulated by gaining physical access to it. By connecting a computer to the machine's serial port, one can rewrite the code and control the election results. The professor also highlights the lack of security measures on these machines, making them vulnerable to hacking. Another expert shares their experience of being left alone with voting machines after an election, emphasizing how easily someone could insert malware into them. The central count scanner discussed is widely used in America for counting ballots. The speakers mention the ease of obtaining the machine's software from a Russian server and the numerous individuals who have access to the machines, including potential adversaries. They conclude that the multitude of possible hacks and entry points make it unlikely that someone isn't taking advantage of these vulnerabilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. I'm a professor of computer science at Georgia Tech. How do we work? It looks like he has a USB connection into the scanner. Speaker 1: The the serial console on the back gives us a wrench out. Speaker 0: That means you have control of the of the machine once you Speaker 1: I have full control of that, and then we can change the results of what it's scanning. My computer is connected to the machine. This is a serial cable, and it's connected to the back of the machine. Take off the back of the machine, and there's a serial port, and that gives a full root access with no password on the app. Speaker 0: There's no security subsystem on this one? Speaker 1: Nope. There's no password on it. With this kind of access, you could rewrite the code that's running on there and get it to count votes in whatever way you want it. You would do this in advance of election night and then wait for the results come in. You could control the election results. Either way, as long as I had physical access to either plug something in or take off the back But you just need that access briefly? Once. Yes. Very briefly. About how long? If you had this all prepped and ready to go a minute, Speaker 2: this it's easily possible for, somebody to get into these machines because they're unsecured for such long periods of time. I have done research on and personally watched 150 elections, at least. 2 of our experts and I went to the closing of the polls in one of the recent elections. At the end of the closing of the polls, the poll workers left us there with about 6 voting machines by ourselves. I was with 2 guys who could have gotten into those machines in a matter of seconds and put in malware? Speaker 3: The machine we're in front of is a central count scanner. It's the ES and S Model 650. It's, to our knowledge, the most widely deployed central count scanner in America. Anytime you do early voting or provisional voting or anytime you're in a state where they do central tabulation of all the ballots, so they bring them to one place, this is the kind of high speed scanner they would use to count ballots. Historically, these machines were examined, and they determined there was a there was a number of serious problems with them by virtue of messing with the Zip disk. Just turn it on for 3 minutes and stick a disk in, wait 1 minute, and then walk away. You're able to change the behavior of the machine any way you want, including changing the results of an election. Speaker 1: It's probably easier to do all of this by just Speaker 0: plug Speaker 1: in is So this probably came from Speaker 0: a server or something else. Speaker 1: I I have no idea where where they're getting their programs. Speaker 3: We downloaded a image of the operating system, the software that runs on this machine from a Russian server. Speaker 1: How many people might have access to stick in as if this like that? Speaker 3: It would be everyone from elections officials to people who run the storage facilities, volunteers in the election, security guards, you name it. There's gonna be tens of thousands of people who have access to the machine in that fashion. And our adversaries definitely have this machine in Russia, Period. Speaker 2: There are so many possible hacks And so many possible vectors for entry. It's hard to believe that someone's not taking advantage of it.
Saved - February 17, 2024 at 4:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) established a censorship consortium that censored millions of social media posts during the 2020 election and COVID-19. The censorship office, housed in the DHS, aimed to counter misinformation and disinformation but ended up suppressing domestic dissent and the populist movement led by President Trump. The consortium, led by the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), monitored tech platforms, labeled tweets as "misinformation," and targeted entire "misinformation narratives." The EIP flagged popular right-wing YouTube channels and received taxpayer funds for domestic censorship. The DHS corrupted its mission by designating domestic disinformation as cyber attacks. The consortium collaborated with tech companies to censor speech related to the election process and vote-by-mail. The extra ballots cast by mail swung the election to the EIP's preferred candidate. The consortium expanded its focus to censor COVID-19 disinformation. Elon Musk criticized the censorship network as a "propaganda platform." The national security state plays a significant role in censorship and election interference in the United States.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨THREAD: @MikeBenzCyber speaks with @TuckerCarlson about the Department of Homeland Security-backed censorship consortium that censored millions of social media posts during the 2020 election and COVID-19. The 2020 election and COVID-19 were the two most censored events in American history. Mike Benz outlines how the government established a permanent domestic censorship office under the pretext of countering misinformation. and disinformation. Initially considered for the State Department, CIA, and FBI, the censorship office found its home in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), utilizing the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). DHS classified elections as critical infrastructure and online misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation as cybersecurity attacks. The original goal of countering Russian disinformation shifted to suppressing domestic dissent and the populist movement led by President Trump. Examining the 2020 election's censorship strategy, Benz details CISA's collaboration with Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphika, and the Atlantic Council through the Election Integrity Partnership. The censorship consortium employed coercive tactics, leveraging its deputized status to pressure tech companies through government threats. A critical element was the seven-month pre-censorship campaign before the 2020 election. The consortium compelled social media companies to introduce a new "delegitimization" violation, targeting content challenging faith in mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot drop boxes. The overarching goal was narrative control, preventing doubts about a Biden victory and avoiding a crisis akin to the 2000 Bush-Gore election. Anticipating Biden's victory hinging on mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot dropboxes, the consortium precensored any questioning of the election's legitimacy, particularly if Trump appeared to win on election night but later lost due to late-arriving mail-in ballots. The so-called "Red Mirage-Blue Shift event." The thread continues below.👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the US Department of Defense censored Americans during the 2020 election cycle. They explain that a group within the Atlantic Council and the foreign policy establishment pushed for a permanent domestic censorship government office to counter misinformation and disinformation. This office was eventually established within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through an obscure cybersecurity agency called CISA. The speaker details how this agency, with the combined powers of the CIA and FBI, classified online misinformation as a cybersecurity attack on democracy. They further explain how Stanford University, the University of Washington, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council, all Pentagon-associated institutions, were involved in a coordinated mass censorship campaign to pre-censor any disputes about the legitimacy of mail-in ballots. This campaign involved pressuring tech companies to adopt new terms of service speech violation bans. The speaker suggests that this censorship operation was orchestrated to ensure the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a red mirage blue shift event. They also mention the connection between this operation and the impeachment of Trump in late 2019.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you're saying the Pentagon, our Pentagon, the US Department of Defense, censored Americans during the 2020 election cycle? Speaker 1: Yes. They did this they oh, they did this through the so so there's the 2 most censored events in human history, I would argue to date, are the 2020 election and the COVID-nineteen pandemic. And I'll explain how I arrived there. So the 2020 election was determined by mail in ballots. And I'm not weighing into the substance of whether mail in ballots were or were not a legitimate or safe and reliable form of voting. That's a completely independent topic from my perspective than the censorship issue 1. But the censorship of mail in ballots is really one of the most extraordinary stories in our American history, I would argue. What happened was is you had this plot within the Department of Homeland Security. Now this gets back to what we were talking about with the State Department's Global Engagement Center. You had this group within the Atlantic Council and the foreign policy establishment, which began arguing in 2017 for the need for a permanent domestic censorship government office to serve as a quarterback for what they called a whole of society counter misinformation, counter disinformation alliance. That just means censorship, the counter misinfo. But the whole of their whole society model explicitly proposed that we need every single asset within society to be mobilized in a whole of society effort to stop misinformation online. It was that much of an existential threat to democracy. And so but they fixated in 2017 that it had to be centered within the government because only the government would have the clout and the coercive threat powers and the perceived authority to be able to tell the social media companies what to do, to be able to summon an NG, a government funded NGO swarm to create that media surround sound, to be able to arm an astroturf army of fact checkers and to be able to liaise and connect all these different censorship industry actors into a cohesive unified whole. And the Atlantic Council initially proposed with this blueprint called forward defense, it's not offense, it's forward defense guys. They initially proposed running this out of the State Department's Global Engagement Center because they had so many assets there who were so effective at censorship under Rick Stengel's feed and under the Obama administration. But they said, oh, we're not going to be able to get away with that because we don't really have a national security predicate and it's supposed to be foreign facing. We can't really use that hook unless we have a sort of national security one. Then they contemplated parking it at the CIA and they said, well, actually there's two reasons we can't do that. CIA is foreign facing. We can't really establish a counterintelligence threat to bring it home domestically. Also, we're going to need essentially tens of thousands of people involved in this operation, spanning this whole society model. You can't really run a clandestine operation that way. So they said, okay, well, what about the FBI? They said, well, the FBI would be great. It's domestic. But the problem is, is the FBI is supposed to be the intelligence arm of the justice department. And we and what we're dealing with here are not acts of law breaking. It's basically support for Trump or if left wing populists had risen to power like Bernie Sanders or Jeremy Corbyn, I have no doubt they would have done in the UK, they would have done the same thing to him there. They targeted Jeremy Corbyn and other left wing populist NATO skeptical groups in Europe. But in the US, it was all Trump. And so essentially what they said is, well, the only other domestic intelligence equity we have in the US besides the FBI is the DHS. So we are going to essentially take the CIA's power to rig and bribe foreign media organizations, which is a power they've had since the day they were born in 1947 and we're going to combine that with the domestic jurisdiction of the FBI by putting it at DHS. So DHS was basically deputized. It was empowered through this obscure little cyber security agency to have the combined powers that the CIA has abroad with the jurisdiction of the FBI at home. And the way they did this, how did an obscure little cybersecurity agency get this power, was they did a funny little series of switcheroos. So this little thing called CISA, they didn't call it the Disinformation Governance Board, they didn't call it the censorship agency, they gave it an obscure little name that no one would notice called the Cyber Security and Infrastructure Security Agency, whose founder said, we care about security so much it's in our name twice. Everybody sort of closed their eyes and pretended that's what it was. But it was created by Active Congress in 2018 because of the perceived threat that Russia had hacked the 2016 election, had physically hacked it and so we needed the cyber security power to be able to deal with that. And essentially on the heels of a CIA memo on January 6, 2017 and a same day DHS executive order on January 6, 2017 arguing that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election and a DHS mandate saying that elections are now critical infrastructure, you had this new power within DHS to say that cybersecurity attacks on elections are now our purview. And then they did 2 cute things. 1, they said mis, dis and malinformation online are a form of cybersecurity attack. They are a cyber attack because they are happening online. And they said, well, actually Russian disinformation is we're actually protecting democracy in elections. We don't need a Russian predicate after Russiagate died. So just like that, you had the cybersecurity agency be able to legally make the argument that your tweets about mail in ballots, if you undermine public faith and confidence in them as a legitimate form of voting, you are now conducting a cyber attack on US critical infrastructure by by articulating misinformation on Twitter. And just like that now what they did then is they Wait. Speaker 0: So in other words, complaining about election fraud is the same as taking down our power grid? Speaker 1: Yes. You could literally be on your toilet seat at 9:30 on on a Thursday night and tweet, I think that mail in ballots are illegitimate. And you were essentially then caught up in the crosshairs of the Department of Homeland Security classifying you as conducting a cyber attack on US critical infrastructure because you were doing misinformation online in the cyber realm and misinformation is a cyber attack on democracy when it undermines public faith and confidence in our democratic elections and our democratic institutions. They would end up going far beyond that. They would actually define democratic institutions as being another thing that was a cybersecurity attack to undermine. And lo and behold, the mainstream media is considered a democratic institution. That would come later. What ended up happening was in advance of the 2020 election, starting in April of 2020, although this goes back before, you had this essentially never Trump, neocon, Republican, DHS working with essentially NATO on the national security side and essentially the DNC, if you will, to use DHS as the launching point for a government coordinated mass censorship campaign spanning every single social media platform on earth in order to pre censor the ability to dispute the legitimacy of mail in ballots. And here's how they did this. They aggregated 4 different institutions, Stanford University, the University of Washington, a company called Graphica and the Atlantic Council. Now all 4 of these institutions, the centers within them were essentially Pentagon cutouts. You had at the Stanford Internet Observatory, it was actually run by Michael McFaul. If you know, Michael McFaul, he was the US ambassador to Russia under the, under the, Obama administration. And he personally authored a 7 Step Playbook for how to successfully orchestrate a color revolution that is in part of that involved maintaining total control over media and social media, juicing up the civil society outfits, calling elections illegitimate in order to remind you, all of these people were professional Russi gators and professional election delegitimizers in 2016. And then we'll get that in a sec. So Stanford University, nominally the Stanford Airm Observatory under Michael McFaul was run by Alex Stamos, who was formerly a Facebook executive, who coordinated with ODNI and the, with respect to Russiagate, you know, taking down Russian propaganda at Facebook. So this is another, liaison essentially to the National Security State. And under Alex Stamos at Stanford Internet, Internet Observatory was Renee de Resta who started her career in the CIA and wrote the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian disinformation. And there's a lot more there that I'll be I'll get to another time. But the next institution was the University of Washington, which is essentially the Bill Gates University in Seattle, who is headed by Kate Starbird, who is basically 3 generations of military brass, who got her PhD in Crisis Informatics, essentially doing social media surveillance for the Pentagon and getting DARPA funding and working essentially with the National Security State then repurposed to take on mail in ballots. The 3rd firm, Graphica, got $7,000,000 in Pentagon grants and got their start as part of the Pentagon's Minerva Initiative. The Minerva Initiative is the psychological warfare research center of the Pentagon. This group was doing social media spying and narrative mapping for the Pentagon until the 2016 election happened and then were repurposed into a partnership with the Department of Homeland Security to censor 22,000,000 Trump Tweets, pro Trump Tweets about mail in ballots. And then the 4th institution as I mentioned was the Atlantic Council who's got 7 CIA directors on board. So one after another, it is exactly what Ben Rhodes described during the Obama era as the blob, the foreign policy establishment. It's it's the Defense Department, the State Department or the CIA every single time. And of course, this is because they were threatened by Trump's foreign policy. And so while much of the censorship looks like it's coming domestically, it's actually by our foreign facing Department of Dirty Tricks Color Revolution Blob who are professional government toplers who were then basically descended on the 2020 election. Now they did this. The they explicitly said the head of this election integrity partnership on tape and and and my foundation clipped them and it's been played before congress and it's in, you know, a part of the Missouri v Biden lawsuit now. But they explicitly said on tape that they were set up to do what the government was banned from doing itself. And then they articulated a multistep framework in order to coerce all the tech companies to take censorship actions. They said on tape, the tech companies would not have done but for their pressure, which involved using threats of government force because they were the deputized arm of the government. They had a formal partnership with the DHS, they were able to use DHS's proprietary domestic disinformation switchboard to immediately talk to top brass at all the tech companies for takedowns and they bragged on tape about how they got the tech companies to all systematically adopt a new terms of service speech violation ban called delegitimization, which meant any tweet, any YouTube video, any Facebook post, any TikTok video, any Discord post, any Twitch video, anything on the internet that undermine public faith and confidence in the use of mail in ballots or early voting drop boxes or ballot tabulation issues on Election Day was a prima facia terms of service violation policy under this new delegitimization policy that they only adopted because of pass through government pressure from the Election Integrity Partnership, which they bragged about on tape, including the grid that they used to do this and simultaneously invoking threats of government breaking them up or government stopping doing favors for the tech companies unless they did this as well as inducing crisis PR by working with their media allies. And they said the government DHS could not do that themselves and so they set up this this basically constellation of state department, Pentagon, and and IC networks to run this pre censorship campaign which by their own math had 22,000,000 tweets on Twitter alone and mind you, they did this on 15 platforms. This is 100 of millions of posts which were all scanned and banned or throttled so that they cannot be amplified or they exist in a sort of limited state purgatory or had these frictions affixed to them in the form of fact checking labels where you couldn't actually click through the thing or you had to it was it was an inconvenience to be able to share it. Now they did this 7 months before the election because at the time, they they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so called red mirage blue shift event. They knew the only way that Biden would be able to would win mathematically was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail in ballots. They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if Trump looked like he won by 7 states in you know, and then 3 days later, it comes out actually the election switch. I mean, that that would put the election crisis of the Bush Gore election, on a level of steroids that the national security say said, well, the the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to in advance, we need to pre censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out Wait. Speaker 0: Wait. May may I ask you to pause right there? Speaker 1: The key Speaker 0: influences. So what you're saying is what you're suggesting is they knew the outcome of the election 7 months before it was held. Speaker 1: It looks very bad. Certainly what they did That's it. Speaker 0: Yes, Mike. It does look very bad. Speaker 1: You know, and especially when you combine this with the fact that this is right on the heels of the impeachment, the Pentagon led CIA led impeachment. It was Eric Cimarello from the CIA and it was the Vindman's from the Pentagon who led the impeachment of Trump in late 2019 over, you know, an alleged phone call around withholding Ukraine aid. This same network, which came straight out of the Pentagon, hybrid warfare network military censorship network created after the first, you know, Ukraine crisis in 2014 were the lead architects of the Ukraine impeachment in 2019 and then essentially came back on steroids as part of the 2020 election censorship operation. But

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

2/ The DHS outsourced censorship to the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), comprised of four organizations: Stanford Internet Observatory, the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, and Graphika. During the 2020 election: •120 analysts monitored 15 tech platforms •22 Million tweets labeled “misinformation” •Entire “misinformation narratives” targeted for platform-wide throttling The EIP claimed every "repeat spreader of election misinformation" was a supporter of President Trump.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

3/ This Orwellian speech control consortium also flagged popular populist-right YouTube channels, including @scrowder, @BlazeTV, @JudicialWatch, and even the @GOP War Room, as “mis- and disinformation” spreaders. The @FFO_Freedom report comprehensively details the US government’s role in outsourcing censorship to this public-private network. Founder @MikeBenzCyber extensively documented the individuals involved and the flow of taxpayer funds ($40M) to domestic censorship.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

4/ The DHS quietly corrupted CISA's mission when it designated domestic disinformation as cyber attacks on "critical cognitive infrastructure." @FFO_Freedom@MikeBenzCyber @TuckerCarlson

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Russians weaponized social media by manipulating public opinion with biased or fake stories. Domestic disinformation is a bigger issue than foreign efforts. In 2016, the Russian content wasn't very persuasive, but they learned they could use existing US content. The focus should shift from foreign to domestic disinformation, as most problems stem from how we interact online and the norms around political speech. The biggest threat to the 2020 election is domestic disinformation, not foreign influence. The impact of foreign interference is minimal compared to the overwhelming domestic disinformation in the US landscape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the Russians have done is weaponized, social media. The issue is not just the Russians, but frankly, domestic disinformation. Speaker 1: How do you think that they've weaponized social media? Speaker 0: Literally using it to manipulate public opinion, to put stories out that are biased or phony in order to drive public opinion a certain way. Probably more domestic generation of disinformation content is occurring in foreign. Frank, I think in in 2016, it wasn't that clear that the Russian efforts in terms of the actual persuasiveness of the content was all that sophisticated. I think what the Russians may well have learned is they don't have to make the content up. We have people in the US who will do it. Speaker 2: There's really 2 totally different disinformation attacks in 2016. The Internet Research Agency created these personas to take over existing groups in the United States. And then once they had established that, they would then try to push the most radical possible position. I think we talk way too much about foreign influence. I'm gonna be honest. I think we talk way too much about it because it's sexy and it's fun and it's it's a little bit cold worry. But the truth is that the vast majority of these problems okay. The problems are information environment or domestic problems. They're problems in how, we interact with each other of the norms that have been created about online political speech, about amplification issues, about how now politicians are utilizing platforms. And so I think, we we have like an 80 20 breakdown of 80%. We talk about foreign and 20 domestic. I think that needs to be flipped. Speaker 3: The Kremlin's influence operations has a a particular resonance for me because in June of 2016, I broke the story of the Russian hack of the Democratic National treaty reporter and I'm more focused on the foreign side, I I think the most significant immediate threat to the 2020 election is the domestic threat, domestic infer disinformation, domestic influence, whatever you wanna call it. Speaker 1: We are lost. It's just because of this little little pity pinprick that was put in by a foreign country. It's overwhelmingly more domestic than foreign. This time around in 2020. They must wonder what they could possibly say that would change anyone's mind that's not already being said in the American landscape.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

5/ But CISA had a First Amendment problem. The US government cannot sandblast millions of voters off the Internet because of their speech about elections. CISA needed private sector partners to do dirty work. And that's where EIP stepped in: "CISA at the time lacked the funding and legal authorizations to go do the kinds of work that would be necessary to truly understand how election disinformation was operating... We were able to pull together pretty quickly a project between these four different institutions to try to fill the gap of the things the government could not do themselves." @FFO_Freedom@MikeBenzCyber @TuckerCarlson

Video Transcript AI Summary
CISA lacked funding and legal authority to address election disinformation. A project involving 4 institutions was created to fill this gap. Government-tech cooperation has been effective, producing 60-70 papers on takedowns. Challenges include maintaining this collaboration. The federal government was unprepared to handle election misinformation and disinformation due to limitations in agencies like the IC and FBI. CISA lacked real capability and faced legal authority issues, including First Amendment concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not because CISA didn't care about this information, but at the time, they lacked, both kind of the funding and the legal authorizations, to go do the kinds of work that would be necessary to truly understand how election disinformation was operating. So because of the feedback, and the ideas from these, this group, we were able to pull together pretty quickly a project between these 4 different institutions to try to fill the gap of the things that the government cannot do themselves. The cooperation between government and tech platforms has been very effective in this. These institutions put together probably read, what, 60 or 70 papers over the last 12 months, talking about the outcome of those takedowns. I think the two challenges here are 1, how do we maintain this? Right? Speaker 1: The federal government wasn't prepared to identify and analyze election mis and disinfo. There was no clear federal lead to coordinate the work because the IC, of course, is rightly limited to a foreign focus, and the FBI also has very specific designations limitations. CISA had created support but had no real capability. There were unclear legal authorities, including very real First Amendment questions. There were unclear legal authorities unclear legal authority

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

6/ So, who are these unelected bureaucrats who get to play judge, jury, and executioner and control the thoughts of millions of Americans? “The main character in the CISA side of this story is its then-director, Chris Krebs.” Krebs's political bias and his affinity for domestic censorship: •Called Trump a national security threat •Pleased with #BidenLaptop censorship •Passionately censored covid-19 and elections •Wanted lawyers and doctors disbarred •Wanted conservative media bankrupted @FFO_Freedom @MikeBenzCyber

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the spread of vaccine and election disinformation on social media platforms like Facebook. They emphasize the need for transparency in algorithms and engagement to hold platforms accountable. The discussion also touches on misinformation surrounding Donald Trump, Hunter Biden, and COVID-19. The speaker highlights the importance of self-policing by groups like lawyers and state medical boards to combat false information. Additionally, they mention the need for investigations into profiteering off the pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The dirty dozen or whatever they're calling it. Some of those have been, deplatformed. But the problem is, particularly for vaccine disinformation, it is metastasized. And it is now you mentioned it earlier about the top down and the bottom up, the grassroots piece. It is now so pervasive that it exists just naturally within the ecosystem on Facebook and elsewhere. And that's where we need the platform to be more transparent in how their algorithms work, how engagement works so that outside security experts and researchers can dig in and hold them accountable, that us as consumers of these platforms can hold them accountable and demand better. That's what would we do if the Russians were doing this? The oath that we pledged coming into office as a federal official is that you uphold and defend the constitution from threats foreign and domestic. We upheld our oath. Speaker 1: Carried it out. So is Donald Trump a domestic threat? Speaker 0: There is disinformation that he is spreading. The Hunter Biden laptop, that was remarkably similar to a hack and leak operation from 2016. It was just in a different model. And again, whether it was Russia or not, I don't know, I don't care. The big shifts that I saw from 2016 to 2020 was the reaction across media and how they did not uncritically and breathlessly report these things. Speaker 1: Misinformation. The the the surgeon general put his finger on misinformation in terms of blocking people getting to vaccines. You fought a lot of misinformation with respect to elections. Do you see similarities between those 2? Speaker 0: Absolutely. We need, for instance, also, you know, self policing across groups like lawyers. So state bar associations can take action against those that sponsor the 60 plus frivolous lawsuits or whatever percentage of those that were frivolous. You can look at COVID, you can see state medical boards similarly took action against, a number of doctors that were grifting on various solutions to COVID. So we've got to have a much broader focus. It's not just the platforms. It's not just, it's not just the government, but there's also the rest of society that can wait. There are election officials that have said we have to cancel our Dominion contracts in order to restore confidence in the local citizenry, the the local voters based on nothing. So the damage is done. And so to your point about, you know, rethinking First Amendment jurisprudence, I don't know what that looks like, but the system's broken at some point. In part because even in November December, I guarantee you that courts would not have intervened because it was still a political matter. And they wouldn't want to get in the middle of that until December 14th in the certification deadline. So I think there's something here that's not matching up and I, you know, and I hope they win. I hope they get their 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 of dollars and I hope they people put people out of business or bankrupt them. What what we are seeing here, though, is an ecosystem of information purveyors. Some of this is politically motivated. Some of it is the anti vaxx community. Some of it is, you know, profiteering. And I I tend to believe that there's a lot of that going on here. Profit and Speaker 1: people selling quack. Yeah. Speaker 0: And and there was a there was a Washington Post piece the other day about, the FTC, a former FTC commissioner, Terrell McSweeney, that asked the FTC to investigate some of this, some of the profiteering off of, the pandemic. And I think that is an incredibly important development in how we're gonna move beyond not just, the pandemic related disinformation, but also some of the, election related disinformation.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

7/ Alex Stamos, a former Facebook exec, is the founder of the EIP censorship network and Krebs' business partner. Stamos is a member of the CFR, a member of the Aspen Institute, and the director of the Stanford Internet Observatory, and he loves censoring his political opponents.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

8/ In Jan. 2021, Alex Stamos compared “over half of the Republicans in Congress” to ISIS. He called on Verizon, AT&T, and Comcast to block OANN and Newsmax and said: “We have to turn down the capability of these conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to focus on addressing violent extremists and limiting the reach of radical conservative influencers on platforms like YouTube and Facebook. Companies must decide if they want to promote disinformation. Additionally, we should reconsider the widespread distribution of networks like OANN and Newsmax by major providers like Verizon and AT&T to prevent pushing radical views onto the public. It's about allowing people to seek information on their own terms, rather than forcing it upon them. Translation: It is important to address violent extremists and limit the reach of radical conservative influencers on social media platforms. Companies need to decide if they want to promote misinformation. Additionally, we should reconsider the widespread distribution of networks like OANN and Newsmax by major providers like Verizon and AT&T to prevent pushing radical views onto the public. It's about allowing people to seek information on their own terms, rather than forcing it upon them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, we're talking about domestic audience in the United States. And the challenge is going to be partially that, you know, ISIS did not have a domestic constituency in the United States Congress. But there is over half of the Republicans in Congress voted to overturn the election. And there will be a continual political pressure on the the companies to not take it seriously. So I think first, you have to focus on violent extremists, and those companies have to be brave in that way. And second, we have to turn down the capability of these conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences. There are people on YouTube, for example, that have a larger day time a larger audience than daytime CNN. And they are extremely radical and pushing extremely, radical views. And so it's up to the Facebooks and YouTubes in particular to think about whether or not they wanna be effectively cable networks for disinformation. And then we're gonna have to figure out the OANN and Newsmax problem. You know, that these companies have freedom of speech, but I'm not sure we need Verizon, AT and T, Comcast, and such to be bringing them into tens of millions of homes. This is, you know, allowing people to seek out information if they really want to, but not pushing it into their faces, I think is where we're gonna have to go

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

9/ Kate Starbird is the head of the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public director and CISA’s “disinformation” advisor subcommittee. US government grants have funded her work on domestic censorship since 2013.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

10/ The EIP's Starbird used advanced monitoring AI to map out entire networks of people who spread a narrative. This allowed the EIP to stalk every chain in what they deemed a "false narrative" and to systematically censor entire belief systems at scale: @MikeBenzCyber @FFO_Freedom@TuckerCarlson

Video Transcript AI Summary
This claim went viral through influential social media accounts and right-wing media outlets. Tim Cast, an American citizen journalist, and the Gateway Pundit were key players in spreading false claims of voter fraud. President Trump's son also amplified the false claim, which eventually reached his allies and family members. Online participants exaggerated small issues like stolen mail to sow doubt in the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's look at how, this claim went viral. These are plots that we were using almost for every incident that we that we picked up from this collaborative group. Our team, every time we picked up an incident, we would plot it in this way so we could see how it went viral. And what these do, this is a cumulative graph, that shows the cumulative spread of a particular kind of claim. And what it has is on the y axis is how many times it's been shared and on the x axis is time. And what we do is we plot each tweet on this, as a shape, depending on what kind of, like what tweet type is this, if it's a retweet or a quote tweet or whatever. And we size each tweet by the size of the audience of that account. And what this allows us to do is some, not always, sometimes things take off with the random account somehow, but often you'll see these high, follower accounts change the, the, change the trajectory of a tweet, helping it go viral. So it allows us to see who is really influential in the spread of, in the spread of a claim. And so, and then, so his original post was repeatedly retweeted, remixed, and reframed as it spread through other, influential social media accounts and right and, right wing media outlets. There we have like, an account of Tim Cast, I think, really sort of changes the trajectory. And he's a American citizen journalist, and a political commentator, who actually gained influence through his coverage of Occupy Wall Street. But he's now aligned with right wing populism in the United States. Another influential account in this incident belonged to the Gateway Pundit, a hyper partisan media outlet that repeatedly spread false or misleading claims of voter fraud. In fact, they, I think they have something like 40 different incidents. Their domain is cited in our data of 40 different claims of, of voter fraud of different kinds. And, eventually this false claim was amplified by the Twitter account of President Trump's son as well, which is a common kind of piece of the trajectory. Often it would eventually reach some of his closest allies and family members and be promoted from there. So online participants repeatedly activated to produce and spread information that sowed out in the election. Highlighting irregularities, and exaggerating the impact of small issues like stolen mail and spreading false like absolute falsehood.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

11/ In October 2018, Starbird told her Facebook followers to vote Democrat to hold Trump responsible for "corruption and collusion" and his "racist, anti-LGBT agenda." Starbird claimed Trump's “nationalism” didn’t stand for “patriotism” but instead stood for “white supremacy." She implored her Facebook followers to vote Democrat to stop "the rise of fascism and white nationalism." "Your children's lives depend upon it," she explained. "We are facing a wholly different kind of threat." This was one of the people in charge of censoring the 2020 election.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

12/ Kate Starbird heads CISA's disinformation advisory panel with Vijaya Gadde, the former top lawyer at Twitter, who famously banned the former President and opposed @elonmusk proposal to roll back Twitter censorship policies.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

13/ Graham Brookie is the figure who led the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab and a previous Obama White House National Security Council member. The Atlantic Council is a NATO think-tank with seven living CIA directors as members. Brookie, a government-funded disinformation expert, dedicated much of his time during President Trump’s years in the White House to promoting the false narrative that the President of the United States was a Russian agent controlled by Vladimir Putin. In Oct. 2020, Brookie would call the #BidenLaptop “laundered unverified misinfo.” When DNI John Ratcliffe stated that the laptop was legitimate, Brookie publicly condemned Ratcliffe’s “credibility” and accused him of “politicizing intel.”

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

14/ Incredibly, the Atlantic Council's disinfo lab tasked by the DHS to censor the 2020 election tweeted its director's disdain for President Trump days before the election. "Trump is hands down the most significant accelerant and amplifier for disinformation in the election."

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

15/ Ben Nimmo, a Facebook exec, leads the censorship role at Graphika and is a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council’s DFR Lab. He was a NATO press officer and was briefly listed as a senior fellow at the UK Institute for Statecraft. “Donald Trump is right that someone is trying to rig the US election, but it is not Hillary Clinton: it is the Kremlin, and Trump is an accomplice, whether or not he realizes it,” Nimmo lamented in 2016. The Pentagon awarded Graphika $5 million in 2021 for more censorship of "disinformation."

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

16/ In June 2019, at an Atlantic Council conference, Nimmo trained journalists on how to spot “disinformation” in Trump tweets and Brexit ads. Senior journalists were encouraged to hold up placards reading “Bullsh*t” to Trump tweets and Brexit slogans. @MikeBenzCyber @TuckerCarlson @FFO_Freedom

Video Transcript AI Summary
The session discusses the use of misinformation tactics, including dismiss, distort, distract, and dismay. Participants analyze quotes to identify these tactics. Trump is cited as a prime example of spreading disinformation. The group also introduces a fifth tactic, divide, to the discussion. The audience actively engages in identifying these tactics throughout the session.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now for the most interestingly named session of this entire event. Speaker 1: It wasn't lies. It was just bullshit. Anybody who works in this space will, I think, acknowledge that in any information operation, it's not just lies. You take a grain of truth and they will build a pearl of disinformation around it. When we're in this space, there isn't a simple binary true or false. There are all kinds of shades of meaning in between. Now, there are various different ways of modeling how you can identify the ways in which people are trying to twist the story. And the model that I use, because it's short and because, frankly, I developed it, is the 4 d's, dismiss, distort, distract, and dismay. These are the 4 responses that we see time and again, which are deployed to attack people like us who come out with uncomfortable evidence. Speaker 2: All of you should have some of these cards on the table. If you don't look on another table and steal one that's not being used, because these are going to help get our attention. We are going to go through a set of slides showing quotes from different organizations and individuals who are using certain rhetorical devices to make their arguments. And so if you go through all of them, at least one of these 4 will apply. Again, dismiss, distort, distract, dismay. Everyone say it with me. Dismiss, distort, distract, dismay. Excellent. You're welcome to scream. I call bullshit too if you're comfortable, but it's not a requirement. So with that, let's play. Speaker 1: Keep them in the air if you think you know the answer Speaker 2: if you got to keep it in there air. Keep it in the air so we can yes. Yep. And stand up and speak loudly and or actually even better wait for the mic to come. Yeah. Thank you. Speaker 0: Well, it's obviously, it can be any number of the Ds. You can say it's distorting what they're saying or distracting them from whatever the issue is saying. The issue isn't real. They're just after me because as their witches and it's evil, I'm the injured party here. So it could be a whole lot of lot of them. Trump's got a nice range when it comes to disinformation. Speaker 2: Does anyone have a number one pick that they would like to mention related to this one? This they said dismissed do but yes, wait dismissed. Yeah the voices How many of you think dismissed? Raise your card, please. I think we're on to something here. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. So you're right that that underneath that attempt, there are he's twisting the story. He's he's he's accusing somebody else of the same thing. Right? But the main thing is what's what what he's saying is, like, don't listen to them because it's a witch hunt. So that was our first one. Alright. Number 2, getting topical here. Remember cards up when you Speaker 2: have an idea? Back here and please wait for the mic. Speaker 0: Distort Speaker 2: any other takers any suggestions well Let's ask how many of you think this one is distort involved Okay, that's a lot any other rhetorical devices anyone wants to mention. We've got a big hand over here. Let's oh, were you just you just kept your hand up. Her hand goes back down. Are there any others? Are we just gonna stick with that one. Yes, ma'am right here distract ah Okay, so for those who couldn't hear It's also distract because it's trying to focus attention on the NHS rather than the vote itself. One more example over here perhaps and the microphone is right behind you so hang on. Speaker 3: Yeah. We've been having a side conversation over here by ingroupoutgroupdynamics and, a group I've been part of, we added a 5th D, which was divide. Speaker 1: Divide. So you Speaker 3: get seeing it so often. Speaker 2: Yes, very good, very, very good. Nice.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

17/ The EIP defined "delegitimization" as speech that “casts doubt” on the election process or outcome. This accounted for 72% of the censorship tickets and targeted over 99% of the posts throttled by narrative, focusing on voting machines and vote-by-mail. @MikeBenzCyber @FFO_Freedom

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses censorship surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and ties it to his involvement with Burisma and the Atlantic Council. The Department of Homeland Security used the Atlantic Council to censor millions of tweets related to the 2020 election. This censorship was on a large scale, banning entire narratives. The speaker provides detailed information on this censorship on the Foundation For Freedom Online website. The conversation shifts to a New York Times report on Ukraine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Talk about you left us hanging with the hey. The the thing with Elvis Chan, this at the FBI is just the tip. But I wanna go back because you've been very about Burisma and all the CIA, all that. And I because I wanna tie it to I'm a get in next to Ukraine and, and, and and the arms request for Ukraine. Tell me tell me about you're saying these things were just at the even in the Hunter Biden, we're just on the surface. We're not down into the thing itself. What do you mean by that? Speaker 1: That's correct. And again, my focus here is on digital freedom and restoring the golden age of the Internet. But these foreign policy issues and dynamics are central to understanding that story. So you had this situation with the Hunter Biden laptop being censored in the run up to the 2020 election. But there's a that's child's play compared to the actual scandal of censorship involving the Hunter Biden laptop network. So you have, Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma, where he was receiving 100 of 1,000 of dollars from this Ukrainian gas company private gas company, essentially. Now Burisma signed a cooperation agreement in January 2017 with the Atlantic Council for the Atlantic Council to to secure deal flow for Burisma. Now Burisma was also sponsoring Atlantic Council events in Monaco and helping, helping facilitate those Burisma deals. Now the Department of Homeland Security then tapped the Atlantic Council in order to censor 22,000,000 tweets about mail in ballots, about early voting drop boxes, and about and about vote tabulation for the in the 5 months before the 2020 election. This would be the equivalent of the Department of Homeland Security deputizing the Trump Organization to censor Russiagate. It was done at scale. They banned entire narratives. If you go to Foundation For Freedom Online, you'll see a list of what those banned narratives were as well as a detailed compilation of the quantitative degree of censorship because these people bragged about it in order to secure more donor funding in a 292 page tell all report, which I break down in granular detail on on foundation Freedom Online. Speaker 0: Michael Mike Michael Benz brings the receipt. Michael, just hang on one second. I wanna keep you for a couple of minutes on the other side. We've got I've got some, New York Times big report today on the Ukraine, about what was turned down and what we're demanding

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

18/ In effect, the left was allowed to discuss the vulnerabilities of voting machines after the 2016 election, and the right was banned from social media platforms for discussing those very same vulnerabilities after the 2020 election.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia stopped using touchscreen voting machines due to vulnerabilities. Voting machines across the US are at risk of being hacked. In Georgia and Texas, votes were deleted or switched in 2018. The biggest voting machine seller violated cybersecurity practices. Many states have outdated, vulnerable machines. Hackers can easily breach voting machines, potentially altering election results. The lack of paper trails in some states raises concerns about election legitimacy. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them susceptible to cyber attacks. The vulnerability of voting machines poses a threat to the integrity of elections. Stalin emphasized the importance of who counts votes. It is crucial to secure the future of elections and upgrade outdated systems to prevent interference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Right. We need to look at all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being, hacked and and attacked. Speaker 1: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 2: For researchers that repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 3: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes. Speaker 4: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from one candidate to another. Speaker 2: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 5: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 6: You could easily hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact, 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines that some pose that pose some of the greatest risk. Speaker 7: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines. Right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 5: Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible Speaker 2: to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including backdoors. We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 7: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 8: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 5: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack one swing state or maybe 1 or 2 Or maybe just a few counties in one swing state. Speaker 9: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states that either don't have any backup paper ballots or only have them partially. You think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding and their ballot boxes gets hacked into, their elections get hacked into, we will have absolutely no backup. Speaker 10: Stalin was unconcerned about the vote. After all, he explained, he said that who voted was completely unimportant. What was extraordinarily important, in his words, was who would count the votes and how. It is time to put politics aside and come together to secure the future of our election. So whether you're a 4 star general, a 4th grade teacher or a computer engineer at Foursquare, this is an issue that unites us. Speaker 8: In at least 40 states, elections are carried out using machines that are at least a decade old. And like any technology, they're susceptible to increasing failure with age. Some state officials have had to turn to eBay to find critical components like dot matrix printers, decades old storage devices, and analog modems. Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 4: In 2016, state election websites in Illinois and Arizona were hacked by intruders who installed malware and downloaded sensitive voter information. Speaker 7: It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free from interference by a hostile or an unfriendly nation. Let's put the resources into upgrading the state's election systems. Because what we know is this, there are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines. Right? Which are vulnerable to being hacked. I sit on the senate intelligence committee and senate homeland security committee. And we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national security. We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections. It's my understanding that some of the election system vendors have required states to sign agreements, that prevent or inhibit independent, security testing. There's a saying that I'm sure many of you have heard, which is the you know the difference between being hacked and not being hacked? Is knowing you've been hacked. Speaker 0: And they are still looking for ways to steal information about voter registration, for example. There are some text experts in Silicon Valley Valley with whom I have met who say that, you know, maybe what they'll do this next time is to really disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to, interfere with the operation of voting machines because still too many of them are linked to the Internet. So there we are still very vulnerable. Speaker 11: I mean, I can tell you in Virginia, when I was governor, I had to replace all the machines. Because I remember when I first voted, when I went to Richmond, moved down as governor, I remember I kept voting in the senate race, kept voting for the democrat, republican name kept coming up. Three times that happened. Speaker 2: What do you mean kept coming up? Speaker 11: So I you know, we had the touch screens. I was voting for Mark Warner, our senator, and Ed Gosphy's name would light up. Happened to me three times. Finally, the 4th time, Mark Damon, I quickly hit vote, and I got out of there. You know, all the cameras are looking at me like this guy doesn't know how to vote. I mean, what's going on? So then I had an investigation done and listen to this, I brought in some technology experts, they were able to hack into our machines from off-site in about 5 or 6 minutes, and within 4 minutes they were able to change a vote. IDD certified all the machines. Now in Virginia, we have paper ballots. Speaker 2: 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including backdoors. These companies are accountable to no one. They won't answer basic questions about their cybersecurity practices and the biggest companies won't answer any questions at all. 5 states have no paper trail and that means there is no way to prove the numbers the voting machines put out are legitimate. So much for cybersecurity 101. The vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions nationwide use election management systems that run on old software that is soon gonna be out of date and ripe for exploitation by hackers according to an exhaustive analysis by the Associated Press. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Arizona, and North Carolina, among others, are all at risk. Even the state of Georgia, which just passed legislation to buy new voting machines, is on track to buy equipment that suffers from the significant cybersecurity weakness. Let's say the election is decided by a small percentage And people in America don't think that the election was fair. The effect that would have on our 200 year experiment in self governance, our democratic system would take a real hit. Our elections weren't secure last week, and they sure as heck aren't secure this week. And anybody who says otherwise is either selling a voting machines or simply has a malicious intent towards our elections. At one point in the Intelligence Committee, both sides seemed to agree that no votes were changed in the 2016 election. And I said, the experts I talk to say that until you have a forensic analysis of a vote, until you go in there and scrub the whole system, You can't really say that. So they're giving these voting machines specifically the hack into how successful were they? Speaker 1: Well, the the ongoing record was, they hacked within 90 minutes of, being, being in the same space as the voting machines. Now these are not hackers that are actually touching the machines. They're doing this from across the room, on, on Internet like connections. But what it demonstrated, Pedro, is that the machines that we count on to make the basic connection between the American voter and the election results are vulnerable if they're in any way connected to the Internet. Speaker 2: And so when you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained access to the machines? Speaker 1: Oh, all sorts of things. They could manipulate the outcome of the vote. They could manipulate the tally. They could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Just it was limited only by the hackers' creativity. Just how vulnerable Speaker 12: the machines were. I mean, what we found is that these machines were purchased by local voting authorities, state and local voting authorities, maybe 10 years ago. In many cases, the software and the hardware have not been updated, so they're as vulnerable as an old laptop that we might have in your home that you no longer use because it's just so out of date. Then what we found is that the supply chain for these machines is largely un plotted. I mean, we found parts from China. We found, digital electronic parts from all over the world. By way of hacking, there's the potential that the actual vote tally could be compromised. So votes could be changed from this to that. Or votes could be suppressed. The votes could be deleted. The votes could be added. So you could actually change the tally itself.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

19/ The EIP collaborated with its Big Tech partners to systematically censor any delegitimization of vote-by-mail as disinformation. In effect, they sided with Joe Biden against Donald Trump and pre-banned criticism of vote-by-mail at the narrative level seven months before the 2020 election.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

20/ The political establishment and the left used the COVID-19 crisis to push for nationwide mail-in voting, which increased the number of ballots cast by mail from 28.8 million in 2016 to 66.4 million in 2020, a massive 131% increase. The percentage of Democrats voting by mail rose from 26% in 2016 to 60% in 2020, while Republican voters only saw a rise from 21% to 32%. In short, the extra 37 million ballots cast by mail during the 2020 election swung the election to the EIP's preferred candidate. In Europe, 74% of nations ban mail-in ballots for citizens living inside their country. Brazil, Russia, Israel, Mexico, and a host of additional developed nations have also banned mail-in voting due to security concerns. In 2012, the NYT wrote, "All the evidence of stolen elections involves absentee ballots." In 2016, Slate wrote, "The only voting fraud schemes with the potential to actually swing elections involved mail-in ballots." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3666259 https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/09/voter-fraud-exists-through-absentee-ballots-but-republicans-wont-stop-it.html

Why Do Most Countries Ban Mail-In Ballots?: They Have Seen Massive Vote Fraud Problems Thirty-seven states have so far changed their mail-in voting procedures this year in response to the Coronavirus. Despite frequent claims that President Trump’s papers.ssrn.com
Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises (Published 2012) Nationwide, mailed ballots now account for nearly 20 percent of votes, yet such ballots are more likely to be compromised, and contested, than those cast in person, statistics show. nytimes.com
Why Republicans Aren’t Actually Interested in Stopping Voter Fraud The Washington Post and News21 published a thorough analysis on Thursday of alleged voter fraud cases over the past four years in Arizona, Ohio,... slate.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

21/ Regardless of your opinion on voting machines or mail-in voting, it’s clear that this public-private censorship network conspired with big tech & big government to censor one side of the discussion. In Feb. 2021, the EIP expanded its focus to censor COVID-19 disinformation. The DHS-backed censorship network launched the Virality Project, a collaboration between the EIP and the National Conference on Citizenship’s Algorithmic Transparency Institute, New York University’s Center for Social Media and Politics, and Tandon School of Engineering. The censorship consortium monitored “keyword-based queries and cluster-based community lists of key public figures and influencers” on all of the Big Tech platforms and mass-censored entire narratives that questioned the safety, efficacy, and necessity of the mRNA vaccines. The DHS-censorship network claims that there are no warning signs in regard to the safety of these mRNA vaccines in VAERS, the UK’s Yellow Card reporting site, EudraVigilance (used in the European Economic Area), and the World Health Organization’s VigiAccess.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

22/ When I first posted this thread in December 2022, the head of the EIP, @alexstamos, asked @elonmusk for “transparency” regarding the Tesla CEO tweeting, “The rules were enforced against the right, but not against the left.” Musk responded to the CISA censorship czar, “You operate a propaganda platform.” Please consider following and supporting @MikeBenzCyber and the @FFO_Freedom.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

23/ Elon Musk slams CISA censorship network as 'propaganda platform' https://www.kanekoa.news/p/elon-musk-slams-cisa-censorship-network

Elon Musk slams CISA censorship network as 'propaganda platform' This DHS-backed censorship network used 120 analysts to censor millions of social media posts on elections and covid-19. kanekoa.news

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Please consider following and supporting @MikeBenzCyber. Here's the full interview with @TuckerCarlson and the @FFO_Freedom report: DHS Censorship Agency Had Strange First Mission: Banning Speech That Casts Doubt On ‘Red Mirage, Blue Shift’ Election Events https://foundationforfreedomonline.com/dhs-censorship-agency-had-strange-first-mission-banning-speech-that-casts-doubt-on-red-mirage-blue-shift-election-events/

DHS Censorship Agency Had Strange First Mission: Banning Speech That Casts Doubt On ‘Red Mirage, Blue Shift’ Election Events The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) quiet coup to establish, for the first time in US history, an explicitly inward-facing domestic censorship bureau. foundationforfreedomonline.com

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Ep. 75 The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy." https://t.co/hDTEjAf89T

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the issue of censorship in the United States and how it is eroding freedom of speech. They explain that censorship is now being justified under the guise of fighting disinformation and misinformation, and that even factual and truthful statements can be labeled as disinformation and censored. The speaker highlights the role of the government in directing these censorship efforts, particularly in relation to the military industrial complex and the defense industry. They also discuss the censorship of the 2020 election and the manipulation of public opinion through coordinated efforts between government agencies and mainstream media. The speaker warns that platforms like X, which currently offer more freedom of speech, are under pressure and may face increased censorship in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The defining fact of the United States is freedom of speech. To the extent this country is actually exceptional, it's because we have the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights. We have freedom of conscience. We can say what we really think. There's no hate speech exception to that. Just because you hate what somebody else thinks, you cannot force that person to be quiet because we're citizens not slaves. But that right, that foundational right that makes this country what it is, that right from which all other rights flow is going away at high speed in the face of censorship. Now modern censorship bears no resemblance to previous censorship regimes in previous countries in previous eras. Our censorship is affected on the basis of fights against disinformation and malinformation. And the key thing to know about these is they're everywhere, and, of course, they have no reference at all to whether what you're saying is true or not. In other words, you can say something that is factually accurate and consistent with your own conscience. And in previous versions of America, you had an absolute right to say those things. But because someone doesn't like them or because they're inconvenient to whatever plan the people in power have, they can be denounced as disinformation and you could be stripped of your right to express them either in person or online. In fact, expressing these things can become a criminal act and is. And it's important to know, by the way, that this is not just the private sector doing this. These efforts are being directed by the US government, which you pay for and least theoretically own. It's your government. But they're stripping your rights at very high speed. Most people understand this intuitively, but they don't know how it happens. How does censorship happen? What are the mechanics of it? Mike Benz is, we can say, with some confidence, the expert in the world on how this happens. Mike Benz had the cyber portfolio at the state department. He's now executive director of Foundation for Freedom Online, and we're gonna have a conversation with him about a very specific kind of censorship. By the way, we can't recommend strongly enough. If you wanna know how this happens, Mike Benz, b e n z, is the man to read. But today, we just wanna talk about a specific kind of censorship, and that's censorship that emanates from the fabled military industrial complex, from our defense industry in the foreign policy establishment in Washington. That's significant now because we're on the cusp of a global war, and so you can expect censorship to increase dramatically. And so with that, here is Mike Benz, executive director of Foundation For Freedom Online. Mike, thanks so much for joining us. And I and I just can't overstate to our audience how exhaustive and comprehensive your knowledge is on this topic. It's almost it's almost unbelievable. And so if you could just walk us through how the foreign policy establishment and defense contractors and and DOD and and just the whole cluster, the constellation of defense related publicly funded institutions strip from us our freedom of speech. Speaker 1: Sure. You know, one of the easiest ways to actually start the story is really with the story of Internet freedom. And it switched from internet freedom to internet censorship because free speech on the internet was an instrument of statecraft almost from the outset of the privatization of the Internet in 1991. We quickly discovered through the efforts of the Defense Department, the State Department and our intelligence services that people were using the Internet to congregate on blogs and forums and free speech was championed more than anybody by the Pentagon, the State Department and our sort of CIA cutout NGO blob architecture as a way to support dissident groups around the world in order to help them overthrow authoritarian governments as they were sort of build. Essentially, the Internet free speech allowed kind of insta regime change operations to be able to facilitate the foreign policy establishment's State Department agenda. Google is a great example of this. Google began as a DARPA grant by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were Stanford PhDs, and they got their funding as part of a joint CIA NSA program to chart how quote birds of a feather flock together online through search engine aggregation. And then 1 year later, they launched Google and then became a military contractor quickly thereafter. They got Google Maps by purchasing a CIA satellite software essentially. And the ability to track to use free speech on the Internet as a way to circumvent state control over media over in places like Central Asia or all around the world was seen as a way to be able to do what used to be done out of CIA station houses or out of embassies or consulates in a way that was totally turbocharged. And all of the Internet free speech technology was initially created by our national security state, VPNs, virtual private networks to hide your IP address, tour the dark web to be able to buy and sell goods anonymously, end to end encrypted chats. All these things were created initially as DARPA projects or as joint CIA NSA projects to be able to help intelligence backed groups to overthrow governments that were causing a problem to the Clinton administration or the Bush administration or the Obama administration. And this plan worked magically from about 1991 until about 2014 when there began to be an about face on Internet freedom and its utility. Now the high watermark of the sort of Internet free speech moment was the Arab Spring in 2011, 2012 when you had this 1 by 1, all of the adversary governments of the Obama administration, Egypt, Tunisia, all began to be toppled in Facebook Revolutions and Twitter Revolutions. And you had the State Department working very closely with the social media companies to be able to keep social media online during those periods. There was a famous phone call from Google's Jared Cohen to Twitter to not do their scheduled maintenance so that the preferred opposition group in Iran would be able to use Twitter to win that election. So it was an free speech was an instrument of statecraft from the national security state to begin with. All of that architecture, all the NGOs, the relationships between the tech companies and the national security state have been long established for freedom. In 2014, after the coup in Ukraine, there was an unexpected counter coup where Crimea and the Donbas broke away. And they broke away with essentially a military backstop that NATO was highly unprepared for at the time. They had one last Hail Mary chance, which was the Crimea annexation vote in 2014. And when the hearts and minds of the people of Crimea voted to join the Russian Federation, that was the last straw for the concept of free speech on the Internet in the eyes of NATO. As they saw it, the fundamental nature of war changed at that moment. And NATO at that point declared something that they first called the Gerasimov doctrine, which is named after this Russian military general, who they claimed made a speech that the fundamental nature of war has changed. You don't need to win military skirmishes to take over Central and Eastern Europe. All you need to do is control the media and the social media ecosystem because that's what controls elections. And if you simply get the right administration into power, they control the military. So it's infinitely cheaper than conducting a military war to simply conduct an organized political influence operation over social media and legacy media. An industry had been created that spanned the Pentagon, the British Ministry of Defense and Brussels into an organized political warfare outfit, essentially infrastructure that was created initially stationed in Germany and in Central and Eastern Europe to create psychological buffer zones, basically to create the ability to have the military work with the social media companies to censor Russian propaganda or to censor domestic right wing populist groups in Europe who were rising in political power at the time because of the migrant crisis. So you had the systematic targeting by our State Department, by our IC, by the Pentagon of groups like Germany's AFD, the alternative for Deutschland there and for groups in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. Now when Brexit happened in 2016, it was that was this crisis moment where suddenly they didn't have to worry just about Central and Eastern Europe anymore, it was coming westward, this idea of Russian control over hearts and minds. And so that was Brexit was June 2016, the very next month at the Warsaw Conference, NATO formally amended its charter to expressly commit to hybrid warfare as this new NATO capacity. So they went from basically 70 years of tanks to this explicit capacity building for censoring tweets that they were deemed to be Russian proxies. And again, it's not just Russian propaganda. These were now Brexit groups or groups like Matteo Salvini in Italy or in Greece or in Germany or in Spain with the Vox Party. And now at the time, NATO was publishing white papers saying that the biggest threat NATO faces is not actually a military invasion from Russia, it's losing domestic elections across Europe to all these right wing populist groups who because they were mostly working class movements were campaigning on cheap Russian energy at a time when the US was pressuring this energy diversification policy. And so they made the argument after Brexit, now the entire rules based international order would collapse unless the military took control over media because Brexit would give rise to Brexit in France with Marine Le Pen, to SPEGS it in Spain with the Vox Party, to it'll exit in Italy, to Grexit in Germany, to Grexit in Greece, the EU would come apart so NATO would be killed without a single bullet being fired. And then not only that, now that NATO is gone, now there's no enforcement arm for the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, or the World Bank. So now the financial stakeholders who depend on the battering ram of the National Security State would basically be helpless against governments around the world. So, from their perspective, if the military did not begin to censor the internet, every all of the democratic institutions and infrastructure that gave rise to the modern world after World War II would collapse. So you can imagine the reality of what Speaker 0: it was later, Speaker 1: Donald Trump won the 2016 election. Speaker 0: So you well, you just told a remarkable story that I've never heard anybody explain as lucidly and crisply as you just did. But did anyone at NATO or anyone at the state department pause, Rome, and say, wait a second. We've just identified our new enemy as democracy within our own countries. I think that's what you're saying. They they feared that the people, the citizens of their own countries, would get their way, and they went to war against that. Speaker 1: Yes. Now, you know, there's a rich history of this dating back to the Cold War. You know, the Cold War in Europe was essentially a similar struggle for hearts and minds of people, especially in Central and Eastern Europe, in these sort of Soviet buffer zones. And starting in 1948, the National Security State was really established then. You had the 1947 Act, which established the Central Intelligence Agency, you had this new world order that had been created with all these international institutions and you had the 1948 UN Declaration on Human Rights, which forbid the territorial acquisition by military force. So, you can no longer run a traditional military occupation government in the way that we could in 18/98, for example, when we took the Philippines. Everything had to be done through a sort of political legitimization process whereby there's some ratification from the hearts and minds of people within the country. Now often that involves simply puppet politicians who are groomed as emerging leaders by our State Department. But the battle for hearts and minds had been something that we had been giving ourselves a long moral license leash, if you will, since 1948. One of the godfathers of the CIA, George Kennan, at 12 days after we rigged the Italian election in 1948 by stuffing ballot boxes and working with the mob, we published a memo called the inauguration of organized political warfare, where he said, listen, it's a mean old world out there. We at the CIA just rigged the Italian election. We had to do it because if the communist won, maybe there'd never be another election in Italy again. So, but it's really effective, guys. We need a department of dirty tricks to be able to do this around the world and it's essentially a new social contract we're constructing with the American people because this is not the way we've conducted diplomacy before, but we are now forbidden from using the War Department. In 1948, they also renamed the War Department to the Defense Department. So again, as part of this diplomatic onslaught for political control rather than it looking like it's overt military control, but essentially what ended up happening there is we created this foreign domestic firewall. We said that we have a department of dirty tricks to be able to rig elections, to be able to control media, to be able to meddle in the internal affairs of every other plot of dirt in the country. But this sort of sacred dirt on which the American homeland sits will they are not allowed to operate there. The State Department, the Defense Department and the CIA are all expressly forbidden from operating on U. S. Soil. Of course, this is so far from the case, it's not even funny, but that's because of a number of laundering tricks that they've developed over 70 years of doing this. But essentially, there was no moral quandary at first with respect to the creation of the censorship industry when it started out in Germany and in Lithuania and Latvia and Estonia and in Sweden and Finland, there began to be a more diplomatic debate about it after Brexit. And then, it became full throttle when Trump was elected. And what little resistance there was, was washed over by the rise and saturation of Russiagate, which basically allowed them to not have to deal with the moral ambiguities of censoring your own people. Because if Trump was a Russian asset, you no longer really had a traditional free speech issue, it was a national security issue. It was only after Russiagate died in July 2019 when Robert Mueller basically choked on the stand for 3 hours and revealed he had absolutely nothing after 2.5 years of investigation that the foreign to domestic switcheroo took place where they took all of this censorship architecture spanning DHS, the FBI, the CIA, the DoD, the DOJ and then the thousands of government funded NGO and private sector mercenary firms were all basically transited from a foreign predicate, a Russian disinformation predicate, to a democracy predicate by saying that disinformation is not just a threat when it comes from the Russians, it's actually an intrinsic threat to democracy itself. And so by that, they were able to monitor the entire democracy promotion regime change toolkit, just in time for the 2020 election. Speaker 0: I mean, it's it's almost beyond belief that this has happened. I mean, my own father worked for the US government in this business in the information war against the Soviet Union and, you know, was a big part of that. And the idea that any of those tools would be turned against American citizens by the US government was, I I think, I wanna think, was absolutely unthinkable in, say, 1988. And you're saying that it's there really hasn't been anyone who's raised objections, and it's just it's absolutely turned inward to manipulate and rig our own elections as we would in, say, Latvia? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, as soon as the democracy predicate was established, you had this professional class of professional regime change artists and operatives. That is, the same people who argued that we need to bring democracy to Yugoslavia to get and that's the predicate for getting rid of you know, Milosevic or any any other country around the world where we basically overthrow governments in order to preserve democracy. Well, if the democracy threat is homegrown now, then that becomes then suddenly, these people all have new jobs moving on the U. S. Side. And I can go through a million examples of that. But one thing on what you just mentioned, which is that from their perspective, they just weren't ready for the internet. 2016 was really the first time that social media had reached such maturity that it began to eclipse legacy media. I mean, this was a long time coming. I think folks saw this building from 2,006 through 2016. Internet 1.0 didn't even have social media. From 1991 to 2004, there was no social media at all. 2004, Facebook came out, 2005, Twitter, 2006, YouTube, 2007, the smartphone. And so and in that initial period of social media, nobody was getting subscriberships at the level where they actually competed with legacy news media. But over the course of being so initially, even these dissonant voices within the U. S, even though they may have been loud in moments, they never reached 30,000,000 followers. They never reached 1,000,000,000 impressions a year type thing as an uncensored mature ecosystem allowed citizen journalists and independent voices to be able to outcompete legacy news media, this induced a massive crisis both in our military and in our State Department and Intelligence Services. I'll give you a great example of this. In 2019, at meeting of the German Marshall Fund, which is an institution that goes back to the U. S, basically, I don't want to say bry, but essentially the soft economic soft power projection in Europe as part of the reconstruction of European governments after World War II to be able to essentially pay them with Marshall Fund dollars and then in return, they were under our thumb in terms of how they reconstructed. But the German Marshall Fund held a meeting in 2019. They held 1,000,000 of these, frankly. But where a 4 star general got up on the panel and said that the what happens he posed the question, what happens to the U. S. Military? What happens to the national security state when The New York Times is reduced to a medium sized Facebook page? And he posed this thought experiment as an example of we've had these gatekeepers, we've had these bumper cars on democracy in the form of a century old relationship with legacy media institutions. I mean, our mainstream media is not in any shape or form even from its outset, independent from the National Security State, from the State Department, from the War Department. You had the initial all of the initial broadcast news companies, NBC, ABC and CBS, were all created by Office of War Information Veterans from the War Department's effort in World War II. You had these Operation Mockingbird relationships from the 1950s to 1970s. Those continued through the use of the National Endowment for Democracy and the privatization of intelligence capacities in the 1980s under Reagan. There's all sorts of CIA reading room memos. You can read even on cia.gov about those continued media relations throughout the 1990s. And so you always had this backdoor relationship between The Washington Post, The New York Times and all of the major broadcast media corporations. By the way, Rupert Murdoch and Fox are part of this as well. Rupert Murdoch was actually part of the National Endowment For Democracy Coalition in 1983 when it was formed as a way to do CIA operations in an above board way after the Democrats were so ticked off at the CIA for manipulating student movements in the 1970s. But essentially, there was no CIA intermediary to random citizen journalist accounts. There was no Pentagon backstop. You couldn't get a story killed. You couldn't have this favors for favors relationship. You couldn't promise access to some random person with 700,000 followers who's got an opinion on Syrian Gas. And so this induced and this was not a problem for the initial period of social media from 2,006 to 2014 because there were never dissident groups that were big enough to be able to have a mature ecosystem on their own. And all of the victories on social media had gone in the way of where the money was, which was from the State Department and the Defense Department and the Intelligence Services. But then as that maturity happened, you now had this situation after the 2016 election where they said, okay. Now the entire international order might come undone. 70 years of unified foreign policy from Truman until Trump are now about to be broken. And we need the same analog control systems we had to be able to put bumper cars on bad stories or bad political movements through legacy media relationships and contacts. We now need to establish and consolidate within the social media companies. And the initial predicate for that was Russiagate, but then after Russiagate died and they used a simple democracy promotion predicate, then it gave rise to this multibillion dollar censorship industry that joins together the military industrial complex, the government, the private sector, the civil society organizations and then this vast cobweb of media allies and professional fact checker groups that serve as this sort of sentinel class that surveys everywhere on the Internet. Speaker 0: So can you give us and thank you again for this almost unbelievable explanation of why this is happening. Can you give us an example of how it happens? How just and just pick one among, I know, countless examples of how the national security state lies to the population, censors the truth, in real life. Speaker 1: Yes. So we have this State Department outfit called the Global Engagement Center, which was created by a guy named Rick Stengel, who described himself as Obama's propagandist in chief. He was the Undersecretary for Public Affairs, which is essentially the liaison office role between the State Department and the mainstream media. So this is basically the exact nexus where government talking points about war or about diplomacy or statecraft get synchronized with mainstream media. Speaker 0: And may may may may I add something to that? As someone I I know Rick Stengel. He was at one point a journalist, and Rick Stengel has made public arguments against the First Amendment and against free speech. Speaker 1: And some of the candidates have done a job. And he's published an op ed in 2019. He wrote a whole book on it. And he made the argument that we just went over here, that essentially, the Constitution was not prepared for the Internet, and we need to get rid of the First Amendment accordingly. And he described himself as a free speech absolutist when he was the managing editor of Time Magazine. And even when he was in the State Department under Obama, he started something called the Global Engagement Center, which was the first government censorship operation within the federal government, but it was foreign facing, so it was okay. Now at the time, they used the homegrown ISIS predicate threat for this. And so it was very hard to argue against the idea of the State Department having this formal coordination partnership with every major tech platform in the U. S. Because at the time, there were these ISIS attacks that were and we were told that ISIS was recruiting on Twitter and Facebook. And so the Global Engagement Center was established essentially to be a State Department entanglement with the social media companies to basically put bumper cars on their ability to platform accounts. And one of the things they did is they created a new technology, which is it's called natural language processing. It is an artificial intelligence machine learning ability to create meaning out of words in order to map everything that everyone says on the Internet and create this vast topography of how communities are organized online, who the major influences are, what they're talking about, what narratives are emerging or trending, and to be able to create this sort of network graph in order to know who to target and how information moves through an ecosystem. And so they began plotting the language, the prefixes, the suffixes, the popular terms, the slogans that ISIS folks were talking about on Twitter. When Trump won the election in 2016, everyone who worked at the State Department was expecting these promotions to the White House National Security Council under Hillary Clinton, who I should remind viewers, was also Secretary of State under Obama, actually ran the State Department. But these folks were all expecting promotions on November 8, 2016, and were unceremoniously, put out of jobs by a guy who was a 20 to 1 underdog according to the New York Times the day of the election. And when when that happened, these state department folks took their special set of skills, coercing governments to for sanctions. And the State Department led the effort to sanction Russia over the Crimea annexation in 2014. These State Department diplomats did an international roadshow to pressure European governments to pass censorship laws to censor the right wing populist groups in Europe and as a boomerang impact to censor populist groups who were affiliated in the U. S. So you had folks who went from the State Department directly, for example, to the Atlantic Council, which was this major facilitator between government to government censorship. The Atlantic Council is a group that was one of Biden's biggest political backers. They build themselves as NATO's think tank. So they represent the political census of NATO. And in many respects, when NATO has civil society actions that they want to be coordinated to synchronize with military action in a region, the Atlantic Council essentially is deployed to 7 CIA directors are still alive, let alone all concentrated on on the board of a single organization that's kind of the heavyweight in the censorship industry. They get annual funding from the Department of Defense, the State Department and CIA cutouts like the National Endowment For Democracy. The Atlantic Council in January 2017 moved immediately to pressure European governments to pass censorship laws to create a transatlantic flank attack on free speech in exactly the way that Rick Stengel essentially called for to have the US mimic European censorship laws. One of the ways they did this was by getting Germany to pass something called NET DG in August 2017, which was essentially kicked off the era of automated censorship in the U. S. What NextGG required was unless social media platforms want to pay $54,000,000 fine for each instance of speech, each post left up on their platform for more than 48 hours that have been identified as hate speech, they would be fined basically into bankruptcy when you aggregate $54,000,000 over tens of thousands of posts per day. And the safe haven around that was if they deployed artificial intelligence based censorship technologies, which had been again created by DARPA to take on ISIS to be able to scan and ban speech automatically. And this gave I call these weapons of mass deletion. These are essentially the ability to censor tens of millions of posts with just a few lines of code and the way this is done is by aggregating basically the field of censorship science fuses together 2 disparate groups of study, if you will. There's the sort of political and social scientists who are the sort of thought leaders of what should be censored and then there are the sort of quants, if you will. These are the programmers, the computational data scientists, computational linguistics, every university, there's over 60 universities now who get federal government grants to do this censorship work and the censorship preparation work, where what they do is they create these codebooks of the language that people use, the same way they did for ICE. They did this, for example, with COVID. They created these COVID lexicons of what dissident groups were saying about mandates, about masks, about vaccines, about high profile individuals like Tony Fauci or Peter Daszak or any of these others protected VIP individuals whose reputations had to be protected online. And they created these codebooks, they broke things down into narratives. The Atlantic Council, for example, was a part of this government funded consortium, something called the Virality Project, which which mapped 66 different narratives that dissidents were talking about around COVID, everything from COVID origins to vaccine efficacy. And then they broke down these 66 claims into all the different factual sub claims. And then they plugged these into these essentially machine learning models to be able to have a constant world heat map of what everybody was saying about COVID. And whenever something started to trend that was bad for what the Pentagon wanted or was bad for what Tony Fauci wanted, they were able to take down tens of millions of posts. They did this Speaker 0: So you're saying the Pentagon, our Pentagon, the US Department of Defense, censored Americans during the 2020 election cycle? Speaker 1: Yes. They did this they oh, they did this through the so so there's the 2 most censored events in human history, I would argue to date, are the 2020 election and the COVID-nineteen pandemic. And I'll explain how I arrived there. So the 2020 election was determined by mail in ballots. And I'm not weighing into the substance of whether mail in ballots were or were not a legitimate or safe and reliable form of voting. That's a completely independent topic from my perspective than the censorship issue 1. But the censorship of mail in ballots is really one of the most extraordinary stories in our American history, I would argue. What happened was is you had this plot within the Department of Homeland Security. Now this gets back to what we were talking about with the State Department's Global Engagement Center. You had this group within the Atlanta Council and the foreign policy establishment, which began arguing in 2017 for the need for a permanent domestic censorship government office to serve as a quarterback for what they called a Whole of Society Counter Misinformation, Counter Disinformation Alliance. That just means censorship, the counter misinfo. But the whole of their whole society model explicitly proposed that we need every single asset within society to be mobilized in a whole of society effort to stop misinformation online. It was that much of an existential threat to democracy. And so it but they fixated in 2017 that it had to be centered within the government because only the government would have the clout and the coercive threat powers and the perceived authority to be able to tell the social media companies what to do, to be able to summon a government funded NGO form to create that media surround sound, to be able to arm an astroturf army of fact checkers and to be able to liaise and connect all these different censorship industry actors into a cohesive unified whole. And the Atlantic Council initially proposed with this blueprint called forward defense. It's not offense, it's forward defense, guys. They initially proposed running this out of the State Department's Global Engagement Center because they had so many assets there who were so effective at censorship under Rick Stengel's stead and under the Obama administration. But they said, oh, we're not going to be able to get away with that because we don't really have a national security predicate and it's supposed to be foreign facing. We can't really use that hook unless we have a sort of national security one. Then they contemplated parking it to CIA. And they said, well, actually, there's two reasons we can't do that. CIA is foreign facing. We can't really establish a counterintelligence threat to bring it home domestically. Also, we're going to need essentially tens of thousands of people involved in this operation spanning this whole society model. You can't really run a clandestine operation that way. So they said, okay, well, what about the FBI? They said, well, the FBI would be great. It's domestic. But the problem is is the FBI is supposed to be the intelligence arm of the justice department and we and what we're dealing with here are not acts of law breaking. It's basically support for Trump or if, you know, if if left wing populists had risen to power like Bernie Sanders or Jeremy Corbyn, I have no doubt they would have done in in the UK, they would have done the same thing to him there. They targeted Jeremy Corbyn and other left wing populist NATO skeptical groups in Europe. But in the U. S, it was all Trump. And so essentially what they said is, well, the only other domestic intelligence equity we have in the US besides the FBI is the DHS. So we are going to essentially take the CIA's power to rig and bribe foreign media organizations, which is a power they've had since the day they were born in 1947, and we're going to combine that with the power, with the domestic jurisdiction of the FBI by putting it at DHS. So DHS was basically deputized. It was empowered through this obscure little cybersecurity agency to have the combined powers that the CIA has abroad with the jurisdiction of the FBI at home. And the way they did this, how did an obscure little cybersecurity agency get this power, was they did a funny little series of switcheroos. So this little thing called CISA, they didn't call it the Disinformation Governance Board, they didn't call it the censorship agency, gave it an obscure little name that no one would notice called the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, whose founder said, security we care about security so much it's in our name twice. Everybody sort of closed their eyes and pretended that's what it was. But it was created by active Congress in 2018 because of the perceived threat that Russia had hacked the 2016 election, had physically hacked it. And so we needed the cybersecurity power to be able to deal with that. And essentially on the heels of a CIA memo on January 6, 2017 and a same day DHS executive order on January 6, 2017 arguing that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election and a DHS mandate saying that elections are now critical infrastructure, you had this new power within DHS to say that cybersecurity attacks on elections are now our purview. And then they did 2 cute things. 1, they said mis, dis and malinformation online are a form of cybersecurity attack. They are a cyber attack because they are happening online. And they said, well, actually, Russian disinformation is we're actually protecting democracy in elections. We don't need a Russian predicate after Russiagate died. So just like that, you had this cybersecurity agency be able to legally make the argument that your tweets about mail in ballots, if you undermine public faith and confidence in them as a legitimate form of voting, you are now conducting a cyber attack on US critical infrastructure by by articulating misinformation on Twitter. And just like that now what they did then is they Wait. Speaker 0: So in other words, Complaining about election fraud is the same as taking down our power grid. Speaker 1: Yes. You could literally be on your toilet seat at 9:30 on a Thursday night and tweet, I think that mail in ballots are illegitimate. And you were essentially then caught up in the crosshairs of the Department of Homeland Security classifying you as conducting a cyber attack on US critical infrastructure because you were doing misinformation online in the cyber realm, and misinformation is a cyber attack on democracy when it undermines public faith and confidence in our democratic elections and our democratic institutions. They would end up going far beyond that. They would actually define democratic institutions as being another thing that was a cybersecurity attack to undermine. And lo and behold, the mainstream media is considered a democratic institution. That would come later. What ended up happening was in advance of the 2020 election, starting in April of 2020, although this goes back before, you had this essentially never Trump, neocon, Republican DHS working with essentially NATO on the national security side and essentially the DNC, if you will, to use DHS as the launching point for a government coordinated mass censorship campaign spanning every single social media platform on earth in order to pre censor the ability to dispute the legitimacy of mail in ballots. And here's how they did this. They aggregated 4 different institutions, Stanford University, the University of Washington, a company called Graphica and the Atlantic Council. Now all 4 of these institutions, the centers within them, were essentially Pentagon cutouts. You had at the Stanford Internet Observatory, it was actually run by Michael McFaul. If you know Michael McFaul, he was the U. S. Ambassador to Russia under the, under the, Obama administration, and he personally authored a 7 step playbook for how to successfully orchestrate a color revolution. That is and part of that involved maintaining total control over media and social media, juicing up the civil society outfits, calling elections illegitimate in order to and mind you, all of these people were professional Russi gators and professional election delegitimizers in 2016. And then, well, I'll get that in a sec. So Stanford University, nominally, the Stanford Airm Observatory under Michael McFaul was run by Alex Stamos, who was formerly a Facebook executive, who coordinated with ODNI and with respect to Russiagate, taking down Russian propaganda at Facebook. So this is another liaison essentially to the National Security State. And under Alex Stamos at Stanford Internet, Internet Observatory was Renee de Resta, who started her career in the CIA and wrote the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian disinformation. And there's a lot more there that I'll be I'll get to another time. But, the the next institution was the University of Washington, which is essentially the Bill Gates University in Seattle, who is headed by Kate Starbird, who is basically 3 generations of military brass, who got her PhD in Crisis Informatics, essentially doing social media surveillance for the Pentagon and getting DARPA funding and, and and working essentially with the National Security State then repurposed to take on mail in ballots. The 3rd firm, Graphica, got $7,000,000 in Pentagon grants and got their start as part of the Pentagon's Minerva Initiative. The Minerva Initiative is the psychological warfare research center of the Pentagon. They they this group was was doing social media spying and narrative mapping for the Pentagon until the 2016 election happened and then were repurposed into a partnership with the Department of Homeland Security to censor, you know, 22,000,000 Trump tweets, pro Trump tweets about mail in ballots. And then the 4th institution as I mentioned was the Atlantic Council who's got 7 CIA directors on the board. So one after another, it is exactly what Ben Rhodes described during the Obama era as the blob. The foreign policy establishment. It's the defense department, the state department or the CIA every single time. And of course, this is because they were threatened by Trump's foreign policy. And so while much of the censorship looks like it's coming domestically, it's actually by our foreign facing Department of Dirty Tricks color revolution blob who are professional government toplers, who were then basically descended on the 2020 election. Now they did this. The they explicitly said the head of this election integrity partnership on tape, and and and my foundation clipped them, and it's been played before congress, and it's in, you know, a part of the Missouri v Biden lawsuit now. But they explicitly said on tape that they were set up to do what the government was banned from doing itself. And then they articulated a multistep framework in order to coerce all the tech companies to take censorship actions. They said on tape, the tech companies would not have done but for their pressure, which involve using threats of government force because they were the deputized arm of the government. They had a formal partnership with the DHS. They were able to use DHS's proprietary domestic disinformation switchboard to immediately talk to top brass at all the tech companies for takedowns. And they bragged on tape about how they got the tech companies to all systematically adopt a new terms of service speech violation ban called delegitimization, which meant any tweet, any YouTube video, any Facebook post, any TikTok video, any Discord post, any Twitch video, anything on the Internet that that, undermine public faith and confidence in the use of mail in ballots or early voting drop boxes or ballot tabulation issues on Election Day was a prima facia terms of service violation policy under this new delegitimization policy that they only adopted because of pass through government pressure from the Election Integrity Partnership, which they bragged about on tape, including the grid that they used to do this and and simultaneously invoking threats of government breaking them up or government stopping doing favors for the tech companies unless they did this, as well as inducing crisis PR by working with their media allies. And they said the government DHS could not do that themselves. And so they set up this this basically constellation of state department, Pentagon, and and IC networks to run this pre censorship campaign which by their own math had 22,000,000 tweets on Twitter alone and mind you, they did this on 15 platforms. This is 100 of millions of posts, which were all scanned and banned or throttled so that they cannot be amplified or they exist in a sort of limited state purgatory or had these frictions affixed to them in the form of fact checking labels where you couldn't actually click through the thing or you had to it was it was an inconvenience to be able to share it. Now they did this 7 months before the election because at the time, they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so called red mirage blue shift event. They knew the only way that Biden would be able to would win mathematically was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail in ballots. They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if if Trump looked like he won by 7 states in you know, and then 3 days later, it comes out actually the election switch. I mean, that that would put the election crisis of the Bush Gore election on a level of steroids that the national security say said, well, the the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to in advance, we need to pre censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out Wait. Speaker 0: Wait. May may I ask you to pause right there? Speaker 1: Key influencers. Speaker 0: So what you're saying is what you're suggesting is they knew the outcome of the election 7 months before it was held. Speaker 1: It looks very bad. Certainly what they did Speaker 0: That's it. Yes, Mike. It does look very bad. Speaker 1: You know, and especially when you combine this with the fact that this is right on the heels of the impeachment, the Pentagon led CIA led impeachment. You know, it was, Eric Cimarello from the CIA, and it was the Vindmanns from the Pentagon who led the impeachment of Trump in late 2019 over, you know, an alleged phone call around withholding Ukraine aid. This same network, which came straight out of the Pentagon hybrid warfare network military censorship network created after the 1st Ukraine crisis in 2014 were the lead architects of the Ukraine impeachment in 2019 and then essentially came back on steroids as part of the 2020 election censorship operation. But, you know, from their perspective, I mean, it certainly looks like the perfect crime. These were the people DHS, at the time, had actually federalized much of of the National Election Administration through this January 6, 2017, executive order from outgoing Obama DHS head, Jed Johnson, which essentially wrapped all 50 states up into a formal DHS partnership. So DHS was simultaneously in charge of the administration of the election in many respects and the censorship of anyone who challenged the administration of the election. This is like, you know, putting essentially the defendant, of a trial, as the judge and jury of the trial. It was very Speaker 0: But but you're not describing democracy. I mean, you're describing a country in which democracy is impossible. Speaker 1: What I'm essentially describing is military rule. I mean, this is I mean, what what's happened with the rise of the censorship industry is a total inversion of the idea of democracy itself. Democracy sort of draws its legitimacy from the idea that it is ruled by consent of the people being ruled. That is, it's not really being ruled by an overlord because the government is actually just our will expressed by our consent with who we vote for. The whole push after the 2016 election and after Brexit and after a couple of other, you know, social media run elections that went the wrong way from what the state department wanted, like the 2016 Philippines election, was to completely invert everything that we described as being the underpinnings of a democratic society in order to deal with the threat of free speech on the Internet. And what they essentially said is, we need to redefine democracy from being about the will of the voters to being about the sanctity of democratic institutions. And who are the democratic institutions? Oh, it's us. It's the military. It's NATO. It's the IMF and the World Bank. It's the mainstream media. It is the NGOs. And of course, these NGOs are largely State Department funded or IC funded. It's essentially all of the elite establishments that were under threat from the rise of domestic populism that declared their own consensus to be the new definition of democracy. Because if you define democracy as being the strength of democratic institutions rather than a focus on the will of the voters, then what you're left with is essentially democracy is just the consensus building architecture within the within the democrat institutions themselves. And from their perspective, that takes a lot of work. I mean, I mean, the amount of work these people do I mean, for example, we mentioned the Atlantic Council, which is one of these big coordinating mechanisms for the oil and gas industry in a region, for the finance and the JP Morgans and the BlackRocks in a region, for the NGOs in the region, for the media in the region. All of these need to reach a consensus and that process takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of work and a lot of negotiation. From their perspective, that's democracy. Democracy is getting the NGOs to agree with BlackRock, to agree with the with the Wall Street Journal, you know, to to agree with, you know, the the community and activist groups who are onboarded with respect to a particular initiative. That is the difficult vote building process from their perspective. If at the end of the day, a bunch of, you know, populist groups decide that they like a truck driver who's popular on TikTok more than the, you know, carefully constructed consensus of the NATO military brass, well, then from their perspective, you know, that is now an attack on democracy. And this is what this whole branding effort was. And, of course, democracy again has that magic regime change predicate where democracy is is our magic watchword to be able to overthrow governments from the ground up in a sort of color revolution style, whole of society effort to topple a a democratically elected government from the inside, for example, as we did in Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych was democratically elected by the Ukrainian people, like him or hate him. I'm not even issuing an opinion there. But the fact is, is we colored revolution him out of office. We January 6th him out of office actually to be frank. I mean, with respect to the you had your state department funded right sector thugs and you know, $5,000,000,000 worth of civil society money pumped into this to overthrow a democratically elected government in the name of democracy. And they took that special set of skills home and now it's here perhaps potentially to stay. And this has fundamentally changed the nature of American governance because of the threat of, you know, one small voice becoming popular on social media. Speaker 0: May may may I ask you a question? So into that that group of institutions that you say now define democracy, the NGOs, foreign policy establishment, etcetera, you you included the mainstream media. Now in 2021, the NSA broke into my private text apps and read them and then leaked them to the New York Times against me. That just happened again to me last week. And I'm wondering how common that is for the intel agencies to work with so called mainstream media like The New York Times to hurt their opponents? Speaker 1: Well, that is the function of these interstitial government funded non governmental organizations and think tanks like, for example, we mentioned the Atlantic Council, which is NATO's think tank, but other groups like the Aspen Institute, which draws the lion's share of its funding from the State Department and other government agencies. The Aspen Institute was busted doing the same thing with the Hunter Biden laptop censorship. You had this strange situation where the FBI had advanced knowledge of the pending publication of the Hunter Biden laptop story and then magically the Aspen Institute, which is run by essentially former CIA, former NSA, former FBI and then a bunch of sort of civil society organizations, all hold a mass stakeholder censorship simulation, a 3 day conference. This came out and Joe Roth was there. This is a big part of the Twitter file leaks and it's been mentioned in multiple congressional investigations. But somehow, the Aspen Institute, which is basically an addendum of the National Security State, got the exact same information that the National Security State spied on journalists and political figures to obtain and not only leaked it, but then basically did a joint coordinated censorship simulator in in September, 2 months before the election, in order just like with the censorship of mail in ballots to be in ready position to pre censor anyone online amplifying a news story that had not even broken yet. Speaker 0: The Aspen Institute? So, I mean, which is by the way, I've spent my life in Washington. It's kind of a, I mean, Walter Isaacson, formerly of Time Magazine, ran it, from former president of CNN. I had no idea it was part of the National Security State. I had no idea its funding came from the US government. You're this is the first time I've ever heard that. But given assuming what you're saying is true, it's a little weird that Walter Isaacson Speaker 1: you You know, I don't know. I I haven't read that book. I I from what I've heard from people, it's a relatively fair treatment. I, Just total speculation, but I suspect that Walter Isaacson has struggled with this issue and may not even firmly fall in one particular place in the sense that Walter Isonson did a series of interviews of Rick Stengel, actually with the Atlantic Council and in other settings, where he interviewed Rick Stengel specifically on the issue of the need to get rid of the First Amendment and the threat that free speech on social media poses to democracy. Now at the time, I was very concerned. This was between 2017 and 2019 when he did these Rick Stengel interviews. I was very concerned because Isaacson expressed what seemed to me to be a highly sympathetic view about the Rick Stengel perspective on killing the First Amendment. Now, he didn't formally endorse that position, but it left me very skittish about Isaacson. But what I should say is, at the time, I don't think very many people, in fact, I know virtually nobody in the country, had any idea how deep the rabbit hole went when it came to the construction of the censorship industry and how deep the tentacles had grown within the military and the national security state in order to buoy and consolidate it. Much of that, frankly, did not even come to public light until even last year. Frankly, some of that was galvanized by Elon Musk's acquisition in the Twitter files and the Republican turnover in the House that allowed these multiple investigations, the lawsuits like Missouri v. Biden, the discovery process there and multiple other things like the Disinformation Governance Board, who, by the way, the interim head of that, Nina Jankowicz, got her start in the censorship industry from this exact same clandestine intelligence community censorship network created after the 2014 Crimea situation. Nina Jankowicz, when her name came up in 2022 as part of the Disinformation Governance Board, I almost fell out of my chair because I had been tracking Nina's network for almost 5 years at that point when her when her name came up as part of the UK inter cluster cell of a busted clandestine operation to censor the internet called the Integrity Initiative, which was created by the UK foreign office and was backed by NATO's political affairs unit in order to carry out this thing that we talked about at the beginning of this dialogue, the NATO's sort of psychological inoculation and the ability to kill so called Russian propaganda or rising political groups who wanted to maintain energy relations with Russia at a time when the US was trying to kill the Nord Stream and other pipeline relations. Speaker 0: Well, they did that. Speaker 1: Marine Le Pen imprint. Speaker 0: They they Speaker 1: Nina Jankovic was a part of this this outfit. And then who who is the who is the head of it after Nina Jankovic went down? It was Michael Chertoff. And Michael Chertoff was running the the Aspen Institute Cyber Group. And then this and the Aspen Institute then goes on to be the censorship simulator for the Hunter Biden laptop story. And then 2 years later, Chertoff is then the head of the disinformation governance board after Nina is forced to step down. Speaker 0: Yeah. Our close friends are Speaker 1: Of course, Michael Chertoff was the chairman at Bay. I'm sorry. Of course. Now Michael Chertoff was the chairman of the he had the the largest military contractor in Europe, BAE, military So so Speaker 0: It's all connected. You've blown my mind so many times in this conversation that I'm gonna need a nap directly after it's done. So I've just got 2 more 2 more questions for you. One short, one a little longer. Short one is for people who've made it this far an hour in and want to know more about this topic and by the way I hope you will come back whenever you have the time to explore different threads of the story. But for people who want to do research on their own, how can your research on this, be found on the Internet? Speaker 1: Sure. So our foundation is foundation for freedom online.com. We publish all manner of reports on every aspect of the censorship industry from Speaker 0: what we Speaker 1: talked about with the role of the military industrial complex and national security state to what the universities are doing. I sometimes refer to as digital MK Ultra. There's just the field of basically the science of censorship and how and the funding of these psychological manipulation methods in order to nudge people into different belief systems as they did with COVID, as they did with energy and every sensitive of policy issue is what they essentially had an ambition for. But so my foundation for freedomonline.com website is one way. The other way is just on X, my handle is mikebensiber. I'm very active there and publish a lot of long form video and written content on all of this. I think it's one of the most important issues in the world today. Speaker 0: So it certainly is. And so that leads directly and seamlessly to my final question, which is about x. And I'm not just saying this because I post content there, but I think, objectively, it's the last big platform that's free or sort of free or more free. You post there too. But, you know, we're at the very beginning of an election year with a couple of different wars unfolding simultaneously in 2024. So do you expect that that platform can stay free for the duration of this Speaker 1: year? It's under an extraordinary amount of pressure and that pressure is going to continue to mount as the election approaches. Elon Musk is a very unique individual, and he has a unique buffer perhaps when it comes to the national security state because the national security state is actually quite reliant on Elon Musk Properties, whether that's for the electrical, the sort of the green revolution when it comes to Tesla and the battery technology there when it comes to SpaceX. The State Department is hugely dependent on SpaceX because of its unbelievable sort of pioneering and saturating presence in the field of low earth orbit satellites that are basically how our telecom system runs, to things like Starlink. There are dependencies that the national security state has on Elon Musk. I'm not sure he'd have as much room to negotiate if he had become the world's richest man selling at a lemonade stand. So there's and if the National Security State goes too hard on him by invoking something like CFIUS to sort of nationalize some of these properties, I think the shockwave that it would send to the international investor community would be irrecoverable at a time when we're engaged in great power competition. So they're trying to kill they're trying to sort of induce, I think, a sort of corporate regime change through a series of things involving a sort of death by a 1,000 paper cuts. I think there are 7 or 8 different Justice Department or SEC or FTC investigations into Elon Musk Properties that all started after his acquisition of X. But then what they're trying to do right now is what I call the Transatlantic Flank Attack 2.0. We talked in this dialogue about how the censorship industry really got its start when a bunch of state department exiles who were expecting promotions took their special set of skills in coercing European countries to pass sanctions on themselves, to cut off their own leg to spite themselves in order to pass sanctions on Russia. They ran back that same playbook with doing a roadshow for censorship instead for sanctions. We are now witnessing Transatlantic Flank Attack 2.0, if you will, which is because they have lost a lot of their federal government powers to do this same censorship operation they've been doing from 2018 to 2022, in part because the House has totally turned on them, in part because of the media, in part because of Missouri v. Biden, which won a slam dunk case actually banning government censorship at the trial court and appellate court levels, is now between before the Supreme Court, they've now moved into 2 strategies. One of them is state level censorship laws. California just passed a new law which the censorship industry totally drove from start to finish around require they call it platform accountability and transparency, which is basically forcing Elon Musk to give over the kind of narrative mapping data that these CIA conduits and Pentagon cutouts were using to create these weapons of mass deletion, these abilities to just censor everything at scale because they had all the internal platform data. Elon Musk took that away. They're using state laws like this new California law to crack that open. But the major threat right now is the threat from Europe with something called the EU Digital Services Act, which was cooked up in tandem with folks like NewsGuard, which is run by which has a Board of Michael Hayden, Head of the CIA, NSA, 4 star General Rick Stengel is on that Board from the State Department's Propaganda Office Tom Ridge is on that Board from the Department of Homeland Security. Oh, and Anders Fogh Rasmussen is on that board. He was the General Secretary of NATO under the Obama administration. So you have NATO, the CIA, the NSA, a 4 star general, DHS, and the state department working with the EU to craft the censorship laws that now are the largest existential threat threat to x other than potentially x advertiser boycotts because there is now disinformation is now banned as a matter of law in in in the EU. And the EU was a bigger market for x than the US. There's only 300,000,000 some people in the US. There's 450,000,000 in Europe. X is now forced to comply with this brand new law that just got ratified this year, where they either need to forfeit 6% of their global annual revenue to EU to maintain operations there or put in place essentially the kind of CIA bumper cars, if you will, that I've been the EU, which is just a proxy for NATO, deems to be disinformation. And you can bet with 65 elections around the globe this year, you can predict every single time what they're going to define disinformation as. So that's the main fight right now is dealing with the Transatlantic Flank attack from Europe. Speaker 0: I've said this 5 times, but that's just one of the most remarkable stories I've ever heard, and I'm grateful to you for bringing it to us. Mike Benz, executive director of the Foundation For Freedom Online, and hope we see you again. Speaker 1: Thanks, Tucker. Speaker 0: Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization. Societies are defined by what they will not commit. What we're watching is the total inversion of virtue.
Saved - March 8, 2024 at 6:34 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2020 election was allegedly rigged according to a series of posts. Various states, including Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, are mentioned as having evidence of election fraud. Issues such as ballot tampering, uncounted votes, duplicate ballots, and errors in the election process are highlighted. There are also claims of Chinese interference, manipulation by tech companies like Google, and the involvement of foreign entities in the election. The posts emphasize the need for election reform and express concerns about the integrity of the electoral system.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

MASTER THREAD 🧵 THE 2020 ELECTION The most “secure” election in history I literally have thousands of clips and data point proving the election was rigged. But I will try my best to consolidate as much information as I can, showing how they are rigging elections. START HERE: •The entire election was decided by 4 extreme updates, which statistically hold a probability rate of less than 0.1% of happening…. Which basically means it’s damn near impossible what happened. •Cyber Security experts identified higher than normal errors rates in various states; the highest being 68.05%. ◦The Federal Election Commission guidelines state than an error rate of 0.008% is an indicator of fraud. Again, the highest error rate found was 68.05%. •No sitting President in 132 years has ever gained votes between his first & second race & lost re-election. Trump gained at the very least 11 million more votes in 2020 then he did in 2016. •During the California count, the data showed that a singular vote was not counted for one person. ◦In fact, a singular vote was fractionalized and divided up at a rate of approximately 66% for Biden, 32% for Trump, & 1-2% for other candidates. Here are JUST A FEW other data points to look at: •MICHIGAN ◦Antrim Michigan, during the forensic report of the audit of Dominion Voting System tabulator machine software, it was discovered that someone had attempted to zero out all election results at 13:53:09 on Nov 21st. This is a clear & unchallenged example of direct tampering with evidence. ◦The most extreme “update” came on Nov 4, at 6:30AM ET, where there was a ballot dump of 41,258 votes for Biden & Trump only got 5,968 votes. That is where this image below you’ve probably seen on social media came from. •On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 293,052 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 154,188 vote “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in. •ARIZONA ◦AZ had 2,000 voters who were “registered” to a vacant lot ◦22,093 “mail-in” ballots were “received” the day before they were mailed. How does that happen? ◦The Maricopa County AZ Hearing, available on Rumble, if anything, should be all you need to hear regarding election fraud. All videos of the hearing have been scrubbed from Youtube. Trump “lost” Arizona by a little more than 10,000 votes. Within the first 20 minutes of this hearing, you will hear that there were over 17,000 DUPLICATE ballots found during the forensic audits, in this one county alone; not to mention hundreds of thousands of ballots in question on the IT router/data side which is described later in the hearing. It is undeniable. •WISCONSIN ◦On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 112,022 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 20,682 “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in. •PENNSYLVANIA ◦On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 555,189 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 81,660 vote “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

•GEORGIA ◦In GA, after the “recount”, which was essentially counting the same fraudulent ballots & was not a forensic audit (big difference), the original numbers were used to certify the results. ◦Thousands of citizens filed affidavits under oath, (under penalty of perjury) asserting irregular & illegal activities in voting places. ◦A GA polling manager testified that stacks of hundreds of “mail in” ballots that were tallied, were on perfectly flat “pristine” paper that had never been folded. (If a ballot is really mailed, it has to be folded in two places to fit in the envelope). ◦Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, without ;legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots. ◦On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 356,945 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 11,779 vote “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in. Again, these were ONLY A FEW data points of what amounts to an unimaginable amount of Election Fraud. Another red flag found i n the data sets of the 2020 election, indicated IMPOSSIBLE identical ratios of votes from Biden to Trump over the course of many days. Nothing to see here. The identical numbers indicate that a computer algorithm was used & it occurred in MANY states. This process is called “Weighted Race Distribution”, which is a KNOWN feature of “Diebold Voting Machines”, which assigns a value to a vote that can favor one candidate over another. As described above, (Biden 66%, Trump 33%, Other 1%). The interesting thing is that Diebold has a eyebrow raising history where (you guessed it) & it was never disputed, that Diebold software was found to switch votes in past elections, as early as 2001. But Diebold had nothing to do with the 2020 election, right? WRONG! Dominion acquired ES&S in 2010. ES&S acquired Diebold under its new name, “Premiere Election Solutions“. It’s a shell game. Follow the money & you will see they are one big happy election stealing family. It is undeniable. The evidence is overwhelming. They stole the 2020 Presidential Election. Let’s Continue 👇👇👇👇

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

🚨 There is a Massive Mistake in the Census Bureau Every American Should Know About In 2020, the U.S. Census Bureau came out and they admitted that during the most recent census, they miscounted the populations in 14 different states. https://rumble.com/v4b5b6c-the-u.s.-census-bureau-admitted-the-recent-census-miscounted-the-population.html Notably, they undercounted the populations in six states, while simultaneously overcounting the populations in eight other states. And when you dig into this specifics of their mistake, there are massive implications not only for this year's election, not only for the general makeup of Congress, not only for the next presidential race, but rather to our entire electoral system for the next 10 years. Republican-leaning states have been shortchanged at least three congressional seats and Electoral College votes because their populations were undercounted in the 2020 census. Democrat-leaning states received at least one extra seat and vote because of census overcounts and kept at least two that they should have lost, according to an analysis of the Census Bureau’s post-census survey. For comparison, no state saw a significant error in the 2000 and 2010 censuses. The bureau acknowledged the errors but stated that there’s no way to correct them until the next census in 2030.

The U.S. Census Bureau admitted the recent census miscounted the populations in 14 different states. Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Democrat Dr. Robert Epstein says Google Alone Shifted 6+ Million Votes to Joe Biden in the 2020 Presidential Election https://rumble.com/v3uz83a-google-alone-shifted-6-million-votes-to-joe-biden-in-the-2020-presidential-.html “Google alone shifted more than 6 million votes to Joe Biden.” Now, by the way, I supported Hillary Clinton. I supported Joe Biden. I lean left myself. So I should be thrilled, but I'm not thrilled because I don't like the fact that a private company is undermining democracy and getting away with it. And there's no restrictions on them whatsoever. Absolutely none….> If you factor out Google, Trump would have won 11 of those 13 swing states, except maybe New York and California.” Another Example of Googles Election Interference: Florida in 2022 on election day, November 8th, all day long, 100% of Democrats in Florida were receiving those reminders all day. While only 59% of conservatives received the same reminders. WE NEED TO REVISE SECTION 230

Democrat Dr. Robert Epstein - Google Alone Shifted 6+ Million Votes to Joe Biden in the 2020 Presidential Election Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Clinton Eugene Curtis: Testimony on How Elections Have Been Stolen Using Algorithms Since at Least 2000 https://rumble.com/v4hq9to-clinton-eugene-curtis-testimony-on-how-elections-are-rigged-with-algorithms.html 2004 Testimony from Clinton Eugene Curtis, an American attorney, computer programmer and ex-NASA employee (Speaker of the House of Florida at the time), admits that elections can indeed be fixed & it would go undetectable. In the video, Curtis testifies under oath that he rigged computer election results for then Congressman Tom Feeney, the former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives. Time Stamps: - 00:25 Are there programs that can secretly be used to fix elections? Yes. October, 2000, Tom Feeney Former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives asked me to do it. It would flip the vote 51-49 to whoever you wanted it to go to. 1:12 How could a secret program be detected? Source Code, receipt & count hard paper against the vote total. If not, you won’t see it. 4:50 “You don’t understand, we need to hide the fraud in the source code, not reveal the fraud, to control the vote in South Florida”. 7:45 Central tabulators can flip votes. A person with bad code can affect thousands & thousands of votes. A recount will not reveal the fraud between a central tabulator & a tampered machine. The tabulators can tell the machines to switch the results when they are networked together.

Clinton Eugene Curtis - Testimony on How Elections are Rigged with Algorithms Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Federal Agencies Interfered in the Election Mark Zuckerberg: Says The FBI Asked Facebook to Censor The Hunter Biden Laptop Before the US Presidential Election https://rumble.com/v1hclxv-mark-zuckerberg-says-the-fbi-asked-facebook-to-censor-the-hunter-biden-lapt.html A large majority of voters say that if they knew the Hunter Biden laptop story was real, they never would have voted for Biden. They surprised this story so it would not hurt Joe Biden. Let’s not forget about those who Organized the 51 Intelligence Letter Saying Hunter Bidens Laptop was Russian Disinformation “John, Can I add your name to this list? Will be adding Leon, Sue Gordon, Jeb Johnson, George, Lisa Monaco, and Mike Rogers DIRNAS today…” John Brennons Reply: “Ok, Michael, add my name to the list. Good Initiative. Thanks for asking me to sign.” https://rumble.com/v2m2p20-mike-morell-who-organized-the-51-intelligence-letter-asked-john-brennan-to-.html There was also evidence of Government Interference released in multiple Twitter Files Drops The FBI Rigged the 2020 Election’ “This election was decided by 44,000 votes in Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin. If we, the people, hadn’t been lied to, Trump would have won. This was not a free and fair election. The FBI rigged the 2020 election.” https://rumble.com/v1hquqq-jesse-watters-the-fbi-rigged-the-2020-presidential-election.html

Mark Zuckerberg: Says The FBI Asked Facebook to Censor The Hunter Biden Laptop Before the US Presidential Election VIDEO: Mark Zuckerberg tells Joe Rogan the FBI came to them and asked them to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story right before the 2020 U.S. Presidential election Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegr rumble.com
Mike Morell - Who Organized the 51 Intelligence Letter Saying Hunter Bidens Laptop was Russian Disinformation Asked John Brennan to Sign Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Jesse Watters: The FBI Rigged the 2020 Presidential Election Jesse Watters: The FBI Rigged the 2020 Presidential Election Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab http rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

2020 Election Edison Data Shows Major Fluctuations in Vote Counts - It’s an Algorithm! https://rumble.com/v38j5to-the-2020-edison-data-for-the-elections-shows-major-fluctuations-in-vote-cou.html Scytl recieved the election raw data directly from election officials in at least 9 states. Elections are an additive process. Each raw data interval of reported votes should be an additive process, and you’d shouldn’t see any deletions. The real-time Edison reports over an elapsed time period paused, oscillated, and deleted votes. This is an algorithm trying to figure out the mathematical problem that is YOU. Projection: • Sometimes they’ll admit to you what they’re showing you on TV isn’t real. Eg estimated votes going from 99% back down to 95% — This is an algorithm trying to figure out the mathematical problem that is YOU.

The 2020 Edison Data for the Elections Shows Major Fluctuations in Vote Counts - It’s an Algorithm! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

America is in the middle of a full blown coup d'é·tatz Nov 2020– Former Members of the US Intel, DoD, NASA, US National Labatories, Cyber Security firms, and legal firms around the country all came together to investigate election anomalies. https://rumble.com/v45f3sb-mike-lindell-cyber-symposium-col.-phil-waldron-your-wake-up-call.html THE ENTIRE US ELECTION SYSTEM is under the total control of private equity firms and foreign money… 🟣 UBS Securities LLC New York & UBS Securities Co. limited, Beijing, injected hundreds of Millions of dollars into Staple Street Capital, the owner of Dominion Voting • UBS holds the intellectual property of Dominion as their equity collateral • Up until Dec 2020, UBS Securities LLC New York listed three senior Communist Chinese Party members as being on the boards of both UBS Securities LLC New York & UBS Securities Co. limited, Beijing. — The companies are owned 75% by the Chinese Government 🟣 Scytl- the parent company of Clarity Elections located in Spain.. went bankrupt in May of 2020, and was subsequently purchased in a closed private equity deal by an Irish Company called, Paragon. • The Election Sites for numerous counties in the US go to a Clarity Elections web address. — The President, Secretary, Treasurer, and CEO are all occupied by one man, Jonathan Brill. • Johnathan happens to be part of Scytl Senior Management team, and has run campaigns for Democrat party candidates. 🟣 The Election Systems and their equipment can be connected, hacked, and manipulated. • The 2018 Kentucky Gov race, showed an exact vote flip of 560 votes that went from (R) Matt Bevin to (D) Andy Beshear. • An Election Supervisor could scan ballots multiple times, and through the adjudication process, could vote for someone who did not vote. • Initiated by a court order, a Michigan Investigation team gained access to a DS200 tabulator, the machine that counts the votes. — A 4G wireless Chip was discovered embedded into the motherboard. — The Voting Machine tapes showed modem engagement and election data. 🟣 THE 2020 ELECTION: Five Key States ALL Stopped Counting at a Certain Time. • When counting resumed, Joe Biden was the recipient of a massive spike in votes. 🟣 Over 200 non-profits received substantial funding from a single source; George Soros. • George Soros’s Open Society Foundation wrote a white-paper entitled “U.S. Programs 2015-2018 Strategy” which began funding radical operations in Arizona & Georgia in 2015, with the goal of subverting the 2020 election. • Through massive campaign contributions and non-profit funding, George Soros owns and controls… - countless public officials - university professors - teachers unions - mayors - district attorneys - judges - congressmen - senators - secretaries of state - sheriffs - governors - and electronic voting machine companies around the world • In 2010, George Soros declared China had a better functioning government of the United States 🟣 THE CCP has Been Plotting to take over the United States Over Half a Century • Their unconventional warfare principals are barely recognizable to the US Population • The Chinese gov and their operative’s have been buying up the United States at an alarming rate… - American Farms & Businesses - Chinese firms own several major US Entertainment Industries, and own more than 8,000 American Theaters - Many sports teams and players are control by the CCP • Joe Biden, as VP, took billions of dollars in bribes from the Chinese Government in the form of payments to Hunter Bidens Businesses. • China is trying to gain Control of US Port facility Operations and already own the Panamal Canal. • China is building 5G networks throughout Europe and the West to steal sensitive data • 97% of antibiotics come from China • 80% of US Imports of rare earth minerals come from China • 97% of Fentanyl is smuggled into the US from China China’s stated goal is to own America by 2035… This is our wake up call! ☎️

Mike Lindell Cyber Symposium - Col. Phil Waldron "Your Wake Up Call" Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Mail-In Ballots & Zuckerbucks Election Fraud Report https://rumble.com/v457fr6-donald-trump-rigged-and-stolen-election-mail-in-ballots-and-zuckerbucks.html Just a few highlights: Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “83K MAIL TICKETS MISSING OR NOT DELIVERABLE IN THE MIDDLE OF 20K VOTES MARGIN OF VICTORY IN WI 2020 PRESIDENTIAL: Unlike other states, its size with an influence on national politics, Wisconsin could boast of the fact that its counts of undeliverable and “unknown” mail-in ballots never flooded the margin of victory of a candidate throughout the state, until the 2020 elections...  Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “The Milwaukee District Attorney rejected 354 references for possible illegal votes since 2020: When registered voters on the same day are suspected of fraud, the votes still count” ... During the 2020 general elections, more than 178,000 inhabitants of Wisconsin used the registry on the same day and almost 5,400 of those voter addresses did not approve the initial audits. Throughout the state, 359 references were generated for district prosecutors. Milwaukee County accounted for 355 of those references. ... The record on the same day in Milwaukee during the 2020 presidential elections generated 21,083 new polls. Of these, 1,247 provided addresses that would later not pass to the initial mail tests as undeliverable. Ultimately, 349 of those voters were inactivated and reserved for referral by the district attorney.  Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “2020: Biden won Georgia for 11K Votes. 27,000 mail ballots bounced from bad addresses: another 217,000 mail ballots are not counted” ... In 2020, the State of Peach broke records of non-deliverable and unaccounted mail ballots... One of the most important stories that has come out of Georgia is how the number of mail-in ballots addressed to defective addresses (undeliverable returns) was greater than the final difference between winning and losing 16 votes of the Electoral College  Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “440,000 Ballots Disappeared by Mail Or it can’t be delivered in the middle of a victory margin of 81K votes in the PA 2020 presidential election” By the fall of 2020, $8 million in Mark Zuckerberg funds were used through the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) in Pennsylvania counties, financing the expansions of the mail-in voting... Now, Pennsylvania joins several other states on the battlefield for losing the notion of more ballots than the difference between winning and losing their votes in the Electoral College. In spite of the governor. Tom Wolf’s promise during the signing of Law 77 that he would help reduce rejected ballots (in addition to the Zuckbucks later to help guarantee so much), the 2020 General Election set a new record for Pennsylvania Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “Arizona: Tens of thousands of duplicate voter records found after the 2020 elections” PILF data show that 31,641 Arizona registrants moved long before the 30-day window that led to the elections and managed to secure a second registration outside the state. Some former inhabitants of Arizona had left a long time ago before November 2020. In one case, a person moved from Tempe to Virginia in 2017 and was actively registered in both states during the last elections... Watch the Video if you’d like to know more

Donald Trump - Rigged & Stolen Election: Mail-In Ballots and Zuckerbucks Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

THE COUP DE'TAT OF AMERICA - Italian & US Intelligence Testimony that the 2020 U.S. Election was stolen from President Donald Trump https://rumble.com/v3usauj-italian-and-us-intelligence-testimony-the-2020-u.s.-election-was-stolen-fro.html “Something has happened, we’re watching a coup d’état in the United States of America.” • China is buying up politicians around the world, buying up property and in some instances, entire countries. • In Italy, Leonardo, a defense contracting firm had strange people come and go from Frankfurt into the Italian US Embassy. According to Italian Intelligence, they were at Leonardo to change the results of the 2020 election Presidential Election. This was a calculated attempt to take down presidencies and control entire countries. • A hand delivered letter that described how the election was stolen was delivered to Donald Trump on Christmas Eve in 2020 • Arturo D’Elia was willing to testify. Larry Johnson, CIA & State Department head, in an audio recording, reveals there was an operation to rescue Arturo— But it never happened and it was buried. • John Durham is in possession of documents relating to Barrack Obama moving $400 Million in Pallets of Cash to the Dubai Embassy into the Merrill Lynch Bank in Geneva Switzerland. • Following the Coup, 5 Italian Government officials, including an ambassador, was murdered • This Coincides with .@MarcoPolo501c3 report on the CCP using the Italian defense contractor Leonardo SpA to steal US aerospace technology (https://media.marcopolousa.org/pdf/MP_Rat_King_Report_7_10_21_1700.pdf) Leonardo SpA was in business with the same UBS Securities that infused $400 million into Staple Street Capital, the owner of Dominion Voting Systems, just weeks before the 2020 presidential election • This coincides with the Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election https://rumble.com/v3usaek-supreme-court-of-italy-legal-counsel-testifying-under-oath-about-interferen.html • This coincides with General Thomas McInerney speaking about Leonardo and was Foreign Election Interference, Hammer & Scorecard, Italy Changing Votes https://rumble.com/v381m67-general-mcinerney-flashback-2021-foreign-countries-involved-in-elections-ha.html

THE COUP DE'TAT OF AMERICA - Italian & US Intelligence Testimony the 2020 U.S. Election was stolen from President Trump Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
General McInerney - Flashback 2021! Foreign Countries Involved in Elections, Hammer & Scorecard, etc Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Chinese “GodMode” Access into US Elections - The Konnech Story - The Pit & the Corrupt FBI https://rumble.com/v38nrbg-china-infiltration-in-us-elections-the-konnech-story-the-pit-and-a-corrupt-.html Konnech Inc: • Provides back office infrastructure systems for election departments throughout the country, including other countries • Founded by Eugene Yu, a Chinese National True the Vote: • Through confidential informants, Catherine Engelbrecht & Gregg Phillips discovered huge amounts of data on a Chinese Server: — Election Workers — Personal Identifying information — Infrastructure, machine ID’s & other components 1-1/2 years after working with the Detroit office of the FBI, nothing happened with this information related to national security. Instead, Washington tried to shut them down. Two DoJ attorneys shut down the investigation & threatened T2V. The Pitt: • An Assistant District Attorney from Las Angeles was at this event. — He initiated Grand Jury Proceedings, which led to the arrest of Eugene Yu • One Week later, Las Angeles District Attorney, George Gascón, dropped all charges against Eugene Yu. The Indictment of Eugene Yu: • On or between October 10, 2019 & October 4, 2022, Eugene Yu & Other employees at Konnech Inc. were providing services to Las Angeles county using third party contractors, based in China • A search warrant executed on October 4, 2022 discovered Konnech employees were sent personal identifying information of Las Angeles County Election Workers to a third-party software developer, who assisted & created Konnechs internal PollChief Software. Konnech Inc PollChief Software: • Pollcheif controls voter registration, poll books, and how you operate • Back-office infrastructure- which if accessed, can manipulate numbers, Ie.. a backdoor that is undetectable • Any employee working for Chinese contractors in PollChief software had Super Administration privileges. In a nutshell, the Chinese had undetectable “GodMode” backdoor Access into US Elections.

Chinese “GodMode” Access into US Elections - The Konnech Story - The Pit & the Corrupt FBI Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

DARK MONEY DONORS AND ACTBLUE ⚫️ 60% of ActBlue Donations Are Coming From China - Amalgamated Bank & Divvy Involved Too - FEC Lawsuit Pending https://rumble.com/v2wp1rk-bombshell-60-of-actblue-donations-are-coming-from-china-fec-lawsuit-pending.html ActBlue feeds money to other PACS, such as Emily’s List, Color of Change etc… There’s also receipts of large amounts of monies on the FEC website to financial processors like Amalgamated Bank, particularly the Washington DC branch of Amalgamated Bank, one of these institutions making many of these transactions. ⚫️ HERE are Numerous Examples of what appears to be money laundered through ActBlue, many of which are through the home addresses of ELDERLY people. • North Carolina - ActBlue Donation Apparent Money Laundering Through Senior Citizens- $26,000 & $12,000 https://rumble.com/v2wuik0-north-carolina-more-actblue-donation-money-laundering-26000-and-12000.html • New Orleans, LA - $29,000 in Fraudulent ActBlue Donation Irregularities https://rumble.com/v2sjfka-new-orleans-la-29000-in-actblue-donation-irregularities.html • New Jersey - More ActBlue Donation Irregularities- $86,000+ $30,000+ $200,000+ from Senior Citizens https://rumble.com/v2rok7m-new-jersey-actblue-donation-irregularities-86000-using-poor-old-ladys-name.html • Franklin Tennessee - ActBlue Donation Irregularities- Senior Citizen Says She Did Not Donate $17,000 A resident in Franklin, TN (near Nashville), said she DID NOT donate 2,182 counts in the amount of $17,092.82 to ActBlue between the years 2018-2022. 2020: 205 counts = $3,071.90 2021: 1,103 counts = $7,997.00 2022: 865 counts = $5,863.92 https://rumble.com/v2pbgyc-franklin-tennessee-actblue-donation-irregularities-senior-citizens-did-not-.html • Atlanta Georgia - More ActBlue Donations (money laundering) Elderly People Have No Clue Their Using Their Names & Addresses From 2020-2022, an elderly woman “donated 1,113 times… many micro transactions… 2012-2022, elderly woman supposedly “donated” 2,173 times, equaling $9,737.61 https://rumble.com/v2pbcza-atlanta-georgia-more-actblue-election-irregularities-on-elderly-people.html • Brooklyn New York - Massive Election Donation Irregularities from ActBlue One Resident- Donated 186 times, $3,000 given multiple times a day One Resident- Donated 1,640 times over a two year period, meaning this person donated 2.25 times per day, every day, for two years straight, totaling $14,200. One Resident- Donated 1,479 times over a two year period, meaning this person donated 2 times per day, every day, for two years straight, totaling $47,000. One Resident- Donated up to 52 single donations a day over a two year period, ranging from .60 cents $738 dollars each time, totaling $89,000. https://rumble.com/v2mwbdm-brooklyn-new-york-massive-election-donation-irregularities-from-actblue.html • Schertz Texas $30,000+ Election Donation Irregularities to WinRed 3,109 Donations, totaling $30,325.67 in the year 2022. By year since 2019… 2019: 1 count = $35 2020: 91 counts = $2,279 2021: 313 counts = $5,395.18 2022: 3,109 counts = $30,325.67 TOTAL to WinRed = $38,034.85. The daughter whose been taking care of her father for 5 years says he’s never made these donations. The 2022 donations means her elderly father would have had to make eight donations of $9.75 per day, every day, all year. https://rumble.com/v2k1nha-schertz-texas-30k-election-donation-irregularities-to-winred.html • Texas OMG Texas Donation Irregularities - 11,000 Donations & $68,000 Over a Two Year Period Through ActBlue That means, this person had to have donated approximately $2,833.00 every single month, or roughly $94.00 per day, everyday, for two years straight. https://rumble.com/v2hlovk-texas-donation-irregularities-11000-donations-and-68000-over-a-two-year-per.html • Texas resident made 10,000+ different donations to the Democratic Party from 2020-2022 worth over $106,304.45 to ActBlue. The resident mentioned that he has not used ActBlue The same resident made $12,848.50 from 2009-2019. https://rumble.com/v2gpv3w-bombshell-texas-actblue-fec-data-shows-one-resident-donated-10000-times-mon.html Massive Election Donation Irregularities From FEC Top Donor- Money Laundering of $154,000 into WinRed https://rumble.com/v2k1nha-schertz-texas-30k-election-donation-irregularities-to-winred.html

BOMBSHELL! 60% of ActBlue Donations Are Coming From China - Amalgamated Bank & Pivvy Involved Too - FEC Lawsuit Pending Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
North Carolina - More ActBlue Donation Money Laundering - $26,000 & $12,000 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
New Orleans, LA - $29,000 in ActBlue Donation Irregularities Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
New Jersey March 5, 2023 - More ActBlue Donation Irregularities- $86,000+ $30,000+ $200,000+ from Senior Citizens Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Franklin Tennessee - More ActBlue Donation Irregularities- Senior Citizens Did Not Donate $17,000 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Atlanta Georgia - More ActBlue Donations Elderly People Have No Clue About Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Brooklyn New York - Massive Election Donation Irregularities from ActBlue Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Schertz Texas - $30k Election Donation Irregularities to WinRed Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Texas Donation Irregularities - 11,000 Donations & $68,000 Over a Two Year Period Through ActBlue Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
BOMBSHELL Texas - ActBlue FEC Data Shows One Resident Donated 10,000 Times - Money Laundering Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Schertz Texas - $30k Election Donation Irregularities to WinRed Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

STATE BY STATE ELECTION MANIPULATION ⚫️ ARIZONA • Arizona Never Before Seen Evidence From the Arizona Election Theft— Amazing Report https://rumble.com/v4htuj2-the-arizona-mail-in-ballot-scam-that-stole-the-2020-election.html • 2022 Midterm Election Major Anomalies— a Montage of Voters Detailing the issues they had https://rumble.com/v1udjlg-arizona-midterm-election-was-rigged-hear-it-from-the-people-who-voted.html • Maricopa County, Arizona: MAJOR TABULATOR ISSUES “75% SUCCESS RATE” November 8, 2022 https://rumble.com/v1sk9am-maricopa-county-arizona-major-tabulator-issues-75-success-rate-november-8-2.html • Arizona Ballot Traffickers Caught on Camera Forging Ballots! Former Mayors & School Board Members Involved! https://rumble.com/v1ab0mb-arizona-ballot-traffickers-caught-on-camera-forging-ballots-former-mayors-i.html • Whistleblowers Expose Arizona’s Ballot Trafficking ‘Mafia,’ Implicates GOP Was Highly Involved https://rumble.com/v11grev-whistleblowers-expose-arizonas-ballot-trafficking-mafia-implicates-gop-was-.html • Email leaks reveal Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs was in regular communication with Twitter telling them who to censor. This information comes from the Missouri v Biden case. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63290154/71/8/missouri-v-biden/ • Jacqueline Breger Arizona Committee Testimony Bombshell! Computer database had been designed with various back doors allowing outsiders to infiltrate & to change the data.” https://rumble.com/v2au3au-jacqueline-breger-testimony-25000-ballots-and-cash-at-a-private-residence-i.html • AZ Director of Elections Admits They performed Signature verification in Private Offices From Home With No Observers https://rumble.com/v2oe14y-director-of-elections-admits-they-performed-signature-verification-in-priva.html • Arizona, Maricopa County On October 14th, 17th & 18th, Maricopa County performed secret testing on the tabulators This was AFTER the legally required Logic & Accuracy test 260 of 446 tabulators failed They were used on election day anyway. Where 59% failed https://rumble.com/v2qxrfw-arizona-maricopa-county-secret-testing-on-tabulators-after-legally-required.html • Maricopa County Officials Not Aware they were Being Recorded, Broke into Machines After Being Tested & Sealed https://rumble.com/v2qxqz6-arizona-maricopa-county-officials-broke-into-machines-after-being-tested-an.html ⚫️CALIFORNIA • Steve Garvey was leading Adam Schiff with 1.8 million votes. And just like that, it was cut in half. https://rumble.com/v4hoi1f-the-california-glitch-switch-they-robbed-steve-garvey-march-5-2024.html ⚫️ CONNECTICUT • Town Clerk Caught on Video Dumping Illegal Absentee Ballots Into a Drop Box Multiple Times in Recent Mayoral Election https://rumble.com/v3iq9ma-connecticut-town-clerk-dumping-multiple-illegal-absentee-ballots-into-a-dro.html • Bridgeport, Connecticut They Redid their Mayoral Election because of Fraud, and Now There’s Fraud AGAIN! https://rumble.com/v498t40-bridgeport-connecticut-redid-their-election-because-of-fraud-and-they-had-f.html ⚫️ GEORGIA • Gwinnett County, Georgia: A Ballot Trafficking Mule Stuffs the Ballot Box! https://rumble.com/v10mgxa-gwinnett-county-georgia-a-ballot-trafficking-mule-stuffs-the-ballot-box.html Gwinnett County, Georgia: Ballot Trafficking Mule STUFFS Ballot Box In BROAD DAYLIGHT! https://rumble.com/v10mgnu-gwinnett-county-georgia-woman-stuffs-ballot-box-i.-broad-daylight.html • Fulton County, Georgia: This Woman Wore Gloves For Her Ballot Drop Offs! https://rumble.com/v10ng9b-fulton-county-georgia-this-woman-wore-gloves-for-her-ballot-drop-offs.html • Fulton County, Georgia: All Closing Tapes For Early In-Person Ballots Are Unsigned https://rumble.com/vwsce5-fulton-county-georgia-all-closing-tapes-for-early-in-person-ballots-are-uns.html • Fulton County, Georgia: 16,034 Ballot Images Were Added DAYS AFTER the Ballots Were Scanned https://rumble.com/vwry0p-fulton-county-georgia-16034-ballot-images-were-added-days-after-the-ballots.html • Full Hearing: SOS Raffensperger Facilitated Ballot Harvesting in Georgia! The Truth about the Georgia Elections https://rumble.com/vuizgw-sos-raffensperger-facilitated-ballot-harvesting-in-georgia-the-truth-about-.html • First Video of Alleged Ballot Trafficker in Georgia Is Released https://rumble.com/vtnx20-january-30-2022.html • VoterGA released proof of Herschel Walker’s 20,000 vote loss that happened at 10pm on election night, November 8. VoterGA Press Release https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Press-Release-VoterGA-Releases-More-Evidence-of-Herschel-Walker-20K-Vote-Decrease.pdf Affidavit 1 https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIna-Stone-Affidavit-2022-Midterms.png Affidavit 2 https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Janet-Martz-Affidavit.png • Fulton County, Georgia: 374,128 In-Person Ballot Images Are Missing https://rumble.com/vwr68d-fulton-county-georgia-374128-in-person-ballot-images-are-missing.html • Fulton County, Georgia: Over 4,000 Ballots Were All Scanned at the Exact Same Time https://rumble.com/vwr6ip-fulton-county-georgia-over-4000-ballots-were-all-scanned-at-the-exact-same-.html • Fulton County, Georgia: Over 104,994 Ballot Images Were Electronically Manipulated https://rumble.com/vwr6un-fulton-county-georgia-over-104994-ballot-images-were-electronically-manipul.html • Dominion Machines aren’t only stealing Republican elections, they steal Democrat Elections too-Michelle Long Spears https://rumble.com/v2w0buc-dominion-machines-stole-georgia-democrat-michelle-long-spears-2022-midterm-.html • Atlanta, Georgia Election Fraud- Emmaus House - Thousands of People Registered to Vote at Location https://rumble.com/v38n7xe-atlanta-georgia-election-fraud-emmaus-house-thousands-of-people-register-at.html • 32,400 votes taken from David Perdue live on ABC during the GA Senate run-off. https://rumble.com/v45n2df-32400-votes-taken-from-david-perdue-live-on-abc-during-the-ga-senate-run-of.html

The Arizona Mail-In Ballot Scam that stole the 2020 Election Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Arizona Midterm Election Was Rigged! Hear it from the People Who Voted! Video Montage! Exclusive: Arizona Voters speak Out on Election Day Debacle in Maricopa County Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at rumble.com
Maricopa County, Arizona: MAJOR TABULATOR ISSUES “75% SUCCESS RATE” November 8, 2022 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Arizona Ballot Traffickers Caught on Camera Forging Ballots! Former Mayors & School Board Members Involved! Involved in the trafficking: - Guillermina Fuentes- Mayor & Now School Board Member - Rosa Velera- Mayor & School board member - Alma Juarez, neighbor and pleaded guilty Associated story https://www.t rumble.com
Whistleblowers Expose Arizona’s Ballot Trafficking ‘Mafia,’ Implicates GOP Was Highly Involved Whistleblowers Expose Arizona’s Ballot Trafficking ‘Mafia,’ Implicate GOP Two men in Yuma County, Arizona, David Lara and Gary Snyder, took down a San Luis ballot trafficking operation using undercove rumble.com
Exhibit Ex. 8 CISA and Flagging – #71, Att. #8 in Missouri v. Biden (W.D. La., 3:22-cv-01213) – CourtListener.com JOINT STATEMENT on Discovery Disputes by All Parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. 1 Defendants Interrogatory Responses, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2 Census-Treasury-State, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3 White House, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4 Facebook Executive, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5 Text Messages, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 6 BOLO, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 7 Approval of Debunks, # 8 Exhibit Ex. 8 CISA and Flagging, # 9 Exhibit Ex. 9 Reporting Channels, # 10 Exhibit Ex. 10 KJP RFP Responses, # 11 Exhibit Ex. 11 Fauci RFP Responses, # 12 Exhibit Ex. 12 Aug 27 Email from DOJ, # 13 Exhibit Ex. 13 HHS RFP Responses)(aty,Sauer, Dean) Modified on 8/31/2022 to add filers and modify docket text (Miletello, A). (Entered: 08/31/2022) courtlistener.com
Jacqueline Breger Testimony: Maricopa County Computer Data Base Designed with Backdoors. Identies of Bribed Recipients, Including Elected Officials, & 25,000 Falsified Ballots & a Significant Sum of Cash at a Private Residence in Mesa County Full Testimony: https://rumble.com/v2atuu4-az-committee-jacqueline-breger-bombshell-testimony.html Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthen rumble.com
Director of Elections Admits They performed Signature verification in Private Offices With No Observers - We should Trust they did Everything Right, Right? Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Arizona Maricopa County - Secret Testing on Tabulators After Legally Required Logic & Accuracy Test On October 14th, 17th & 18th, Maricopa County performed secret testing on the tabulators This was AFTER the legally required Logic & Accuracy test 260 of 446 tabulators failed They were used on electi rumble.com
Arizona Maricopa County - Officials Not Aware they were Being Recorded, Broke into Machines After Being Tested & Sealed Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
The California Glitch Switch- They Robbed Steve Garvey - March 5, 2024 Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Connecticut - Town Clerk Dumping Multiple Illegal Absentee Ballots Into a Drop Box - Election FRAUD! Article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/connecticut-democrat-primary-election-scandal-police-launch-investigation/ Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base rumble.com
Bridgeport Connecticut Redid their Election because of Fraud and they Had Fraud Again! Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesint rumble.com
Gwinnett County, Georgia: A Ballot Trafficking Mule Stuffs the Ballot Box! Gwinnett County, Georgia: A Ballot Trafficking Mule Stuffs the Ballot Box! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. ww.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight F rumble.com
Gwinnett County, Georgia: Ballot Trafficking Mule STUFFS Ballot Box In BROAD DAYLIGHT! Gwinnett County, Georgia: Woman STUFFS Ballot Box I. BROAD DAYLIGHT! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find m rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: This Woman Wore Gloves For Her Ballot Drop Offs! Fulton County, Georgia: This Woman Wore Gloves For Her Ballot Drop Offs! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Fi rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: All Closing Tapes For Early In-Person Ballots Are Unsigned Election Fraud! All closing tapes for early in-person ballots are unsigned 315,000 ballots nobody swore actually occurred "This alone says that something happened with these ballots when they were bei rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: 16,034 Ballot Images Were Added DAYS AFTER the Ballots Were Scanned 16,034 ballot images were added days AFTER the ballots were scanned "That's not possible...What that means is there is not a single ballot cast in Fulton County that we can authenticate." Political Ju rumble.com
Full Hearing: SOS Raffensperger Facilitated Ballot Harvesting in Georgia! The Truth about the Georgia Elections REPORT: SOS Raffensperger Facilitated Ballot Harvesting in Georgia – Then Defended Results with Completely Bogus Report (VIDEO) On Wednesday, 2/9/2022, Garland Favorito and VoterGA presented their lat rumble.com
First Video of Alleged Ballot Trafficker in Georgia Is Released- True The Vote Investigations On Friday, VoterGA’s David Cross shared an example of True the Vote’s surveillance footage. https://twitter.com/gaballots/status/1487209392915288064?s=21 My Website tracks election fraud and the Pland rumble.com
Page not found | VOTER GA Voters Organized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia voterga.org
Page not found | VOTER GA Voters Organized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia voterga.org
Page not found | VOTER GA Voters Organized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia voterga.org
Fulton County, Georgia: 374,128 In-Person Ballot Images Are Missing ALL 374,128 in-person ballot images in Fulton County are missing in violation of federal and state law Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. I run a Website in my spare time that tracks el rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: Over 4,000 Ballots Were All Scanned at the Exact Same Time Over 4,000 ballots were all scanned at the exact same time Unconventional Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. I run a Website in my spare time that tracks election fraud, human Trafficki rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: Over 104,994 Ballot Images Were Electronically Manipulated Over 104,994 ballot image files were electronically manipulated "What we normally see is a 1 second delay between the two. What we're seeing here in this case is several minutes...we have further dela rumble.com
Dominion Machines Stole Georgia Democrat Michelle Long Spears 2022 Midterm Primary Election Source https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/06/us/politics/michelle-long-spears-georgia.html Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesi rumble.com
Atlanta, Georgia Election Fraud - Emmaus House - Thousands of People Registered to Vote at Location Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
32,400 votes taken from David Perdue live on ABC during the GA Senate run-off. Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

⚫️ PENNSYLVANIA • Illegal Electioneering For John Fetterman & Josh Shapiro Caught on Undercover Video https://rumble.com/v1spz38-breaking-illegal-electioneering-for-john-fetterman-and-josh-shapiro-caught-.html • MAN Caught on LIVE TV During Faulkner Focus Marking Numerous Ballots! STOP THE STEAL!!!! November 8, 2022 https://rumble.com/v1smblw-man-caught-on-live-tv-marking-numerous-ballots-stop-the-steal-november-8-20.html • Pennsylvania Drop Box Opened For First Time Came Pre-Loaded With Ballots! https://rumble.com/v1q8j83-pennsylvania-drop-box-opened-for-first-time-came-pre-loaded-with-ballots.html • Trucker Whistleblower- I Hauled Completed Mail-In Ballots Across State Lines https://rumble.com/v12ibxz-trucker-whistleblower-i-hauled-completed-mail-in-ballots-across-state-lines.html • Philadelphia Observer Photographed 40-50 People Entering The Vote Counting Center With Backpacks https://rumble.com/v12hwlo-philadelphia-observer-photographed-40-50-people-entering-the-vote-counting-.html • Pennsylvania: Ballot Trafficker Breaking Up Pile of Harvested Ballots To Stuff Them Into Drop Box https://rumble.com/vxzxmf-pennsylvania-ballot-trafficker-breaking-up-pile-of-harvested-ballots-to-stu.html • 350,000 in-Person Votes being Removed from Republicans in the recent 2023 Supreme Court race, with no explanation! rumble.com/v3w5bpy-audit-… • Watch 19,958 votes switched from Donald Trump to Joe Biden live on CNN. https://rumble.com/v45n336-19958-votes-switched-from-donald-trump-to-joe-biden-live-on-cnn..html ⚫️ MICHIGAN • Voters Being Told They’ve Already Voted Absentee Ballot! November 8, 2022 https://rumble.com/v1slgpy-voters-in-detroit-michigan-are-being-told-theyve-already-voted-absentee-bal.html • Same Woman Stuffs a Drop Box Four Different Times https://rumble.com/v15ibbt-detroit-michigan-same-woman-stuffs-a-drop-box-four-different-times.html • Ballot Mule: Mail man Dropping Multiple Ballots off over Many Trips https://rumble.com/v11rrbk-ballot-mule-mail-man-dropping-multiple-ballots-off-over-many-trips.html • Ballot Mule: Who came out of the Department of Elections with stacks of Ballots! https://rumble.com/v11rrgn-ballot-mule-just-a-man-walking-around-with-a-huge-stack-of-ballots-nothing-.html • Ballot Mule: Signs & Drops Stacks of Ballots Off Committing Multiple Felonies https://rumble.com/v11rr63-ballot-mule-signs-and-drops-stacks-of-ballots-off-committing-multiple-felon.html • Police Find: TENS OF THOUSANDS of Fake Registrations, Bags of Pre-Paid Gift Cards, Guns with Silencers, Burner Phones, and a Democrat-Funded Organization https://rumble.com/v35tqrw-massive-2020-voter-fraud-in-michigan-police-find-tens-of-thousands-of-fake-.html ⚫️ MISSISSIPPI • Hinds County Democrat Supervisor David Archie - We have Videotape of Jacquie Amos Bringing in Thumb Drives, Going into & bringing in Ballots to be Inserted into Machines https://rumble.com/v3e54yi-mississippi-hinds-county-democrat-supervisor-says-election-was-rigged-and-h.html ⚫️ NEW YORK • Midterm Election Fraud Bombshell of Duplicated Vote Counts in Almost Every Single County! https://rumble.com/v1t23sc-new-york-midterm-election-fraud-bobmshell-of-duplicated-votes-counts-in-alm.html • Democrat New York Election Inspector Deceives Voting System to Secure Official Republican Position https://rumble.com/v1spygq-democrat-new-york-election-inspector-deceives-voting-system-to-secure-offic.html ⚫️ SOUTH CAROLINA Leaked Call: SC Democrat Krystle Mathews Wants to Infiltrate GOP with “Secret Sleepers” and Fund Campaign with Dope Money https://rumble.com/v1a5jg6-leaked-call-sc-democrat-krystle-mathews-wants-to-infiltrate-gop-with-secret.html ⚫️ TEXAS • Poll Pads in Dallas Were CAUGHT Adding Hundreds of Voters in Real Time as the Polls Closed! https://rumble.com/v1u5t0k-texas-poll-pads-in-dallas-were-caught-adding-hundreds-of-voters-in-real-tim.html ⚫️ WISCONSIN • 625,000 Dead People On Wisconsin’s Voter Rolls https://rumble.com/vumvp8-wisconsin-625000-dead-people-on-wisconsins-voter-rolls.html • Wisconsin Has 4 Million Adults but 7.1 Million Voter Registrations https://rumble.com/vumym8-wisconsin-wisconsin-has-4-million-adults-but-7.1-million-voter-registration.html • One Address Had 359 “Voters” That Hasn’t Existed for 10 Years Are Still Registered There https://rumble.com/vumxzl-wisconsin-one-address-had-359-voters-that-hasnt-existed-for-10-years-are-st.html • MASSIVE Amounts of Voters Registered In Small Living Areas Revealed https://rumble.com/vumxi4-wisconsin-massive-amounts-of-voters-in-small-living-areas-revealed.html • Instances Where ONE Voter Was Assigned 28 DIFFERENT ID NUMBERS! https://rumble.com/vumwql-wisconsin-instances-where-one-voter-was-assigned-28-different-id-numbers.html • 5.6% Illegal Votes From Voters Who Moved & Phantom Votes= 165,000 Illegal Votes https://rumble.com/vumun2-wisconsin-5.6-illegal-votes-from-voters-who-moved-and-phantom-votes-165000-.html • 3,713 "Voters" Registered to Vote From U.S. Post Offices https://rumble.com/vumti7-wisconsin-3713-voters-registered-to-u.s.-post-offices.html • 113 Ballots were Cast From The SAME ADDRESS, Where NO ONE LIVED! https://rumble.com/vumspx-wisconsin-113-ballots-were-cast-from-the-same-address-where-no-one-lived.html • 1.5 MILLION Illegal Voter Registrations and 155,000 Suspected FAKE Ballots https://rumble.com/vumro4-wisconsin-1.5-illegal-voter-registrations-and-155000-suspected-fake-ballots.html • Over 50,000 Fraudulent Votes Cast from Phantom Voters Identified in Wisconsin https://rumble.com/vumr6n-huge-over-50000-fraudulent-votes-cast-from-phantom-voters-identified-in-wis.html • How They Cheated. Dirty Voter Rolls, Mass Mail In Ballots, Traffickers, NGO’s, Drop Boxes https://rumble.com/vz8ju3-wisconsin-how-they-did-it.-dirty-voter-rolls-mass-mail-in-ballots-trafficke.html • Election Bribery Scheme Discovered in Supreme Court Case involving leftist group “Wisconsin Takes Action” https://rumble.com/v2bdmss-wisconsin-bombshell-election-bribery-scheme-discovered-with-wisconsin-takes.html • Double Voting Occurring With Same Voter Registration With Different Voter ID Numbers https://rumble.com/vumvi6-wisconsin-double-voting-occurring-with-same-voter-registration-with-differe.html • Former USPS employee Ethan Pease, blows the whistle on 100,000 missing Wisconsin ballots https://rumble.com/v3k45ch-wisconsin-a-former-usps-employee-blows-the-whistle-on-100000-missing-wiscon.html • Wisconsin: 138 Ballot Traffickers Went to Drop Boxes 3,568 Times https://rumble.com/vz8cel-wisconsin-138-ballot-traffickers-went-to-drop-boxes-3568-times.html

BREAKING: Illegal Electioneering For John Fetterman & Josh Shapiro Caught on Undercover Video Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
MAN Caught on LIVE TV During Faulkner Focus Marking Numerous Ballots! STOP THE STEAL!!!! November 8, 2022 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Pennsylvania Drop Box Opened For First Time Came Pre-Loaded With Ballots! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Trucker Whistleblower- I Hauled Completed Mail-In Ballots Across State Lines #ElectionFraud True the Vote Pennsylvania trucker Jesse Morgan drove approximately 288,000 completed mail-in ballots from Bethpage, New York to the USPS facility in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania where he w rumble.com
Philadelphia Observer Photographed 40-50 People Entering The Vote Counting Center With Backpacks True the Vote On election night, an observer at the Philadelphia Convention Center photographed approximately forty to fifty people entering the vote-counting center with backpacks, bags, and purses w rumble.com
Pennsylvania: Ballot Trafficker Breaking Up Pile of Harvested Ballots To Stuff Them Into Drop Box Video Captures Pennsylvania Ballot Trafficker Forced to Break-Up Fat Pile of Harvested Ballots Into Smaller Stacks to Stuff Them Into Drop Box A video obtained by the Montgomery County Republican Comm rumble.com
19,958 votes switched from Donald Trump to Joe Biden live on CNN. Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Voters in Detroit Michigan are Being Told They’ve Already Voted Absentee Ballot! November 8, 2022 BREAKING: Voters in Detroit, MI are showing up to the polls being told they've already voted absentee when they arrive. Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me rumble.com
Detroit, Michigan— Same Woman Stuffs a Drop Box Four Different Times Detroit, Michigan— Same Woman Stuffs a Drop Box Four Different Times Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find m rumble.com
Ballot Mule: Mail man Dropping Multiple Ballots off over Many Trips Ballot Mule: Mail man Dropping Multiple Ballots off over Many Trips Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find me rumble.com
Ballot Mule: Just a Man Walking Around With a Huge Stack of Ballots! Nothing to See Here… Ballot Mule: Just a Man Walking Around With a Huge Stack of Ballots! Nothing to See Here… Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/can rumble.com
Ballot Mule: Signs & Drops Stacks of Ballots Off Committing Multiple Felonies Ballot Mule: Signs & Drops Stacks of Ballots Off Committing Multiple Felonies Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenig rumble.com
Massive 2020 Voter Fraud in Michigan - Police Find: TENS OF THOUSANDS of Fake Registrations, Bags of Pre-Paid Gift Cards, Guns with Silencers, Burner Phones, and a Democrat-Funded Organization with Facilities in Several States 2020 Police Report October 2020 POLICE REPORT https://archive.org/details/msp-foia-1-of-2/mode/2up?view=theater TGP Article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/now-we-have-proof-tgp-exclusive-mas rumble.com
Mississippi - Hinds County Democrat Supervisor says Election was Rigged & Has Video Tape Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
New York Midterm Election Fraud Bombshell of Duplicated Vote Counts in Almost Every Single County! Get this to Lee Zeldin! This data is from DDHQ (Decision Desk HQ), as it is verified on the video itself. DDHQ data (verified in video. Top left corner) New York had 99% votes in at 8:33PM. There was never an escalation of v rumble.com
Democrat New York Election Inspector Deceives Voting System to Secure Official Republican Position Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Leaked Call: SC Democrat Krystle Mathews Wants to Infiltrate GOP with “Secret Sleepers” and Fund Campaign with Dope Money Leaked Call: SC Democrat Krystle Mathews Wants to Infiltrate GOP with “Secret Sleepers” & Fund Campaign with Dope Money Source: www.projectveritas.com Political Commentator & Truth teller in my spare rumble.com
TEXAS Poll Pads in Dallas Were CAUGHT Adding Hundreds of Voters in Real Time as the Polls Closed! Associated Article: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/breaking-exclusive-election-poll-pads-caught-adding-hundreds-voters-real-time-texas-poll-closed-video/ TEXAS 🚨 Footage reveals that poll pa rumble.com
Wisconsin- 625,000 Dead People On Wisconsin’s Voter Rolls 625,000 dead people on Wisconsin's voter rolls My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on TG at t.me/cand rumble.com
Wisconsin- Wisconsin Has 4 Million Adults but 7.1 Million Voter Registrations Wisconsin has 4 million adults but 7.1 million voter registrations My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find M rumble.com
Wisconsin- One Address Had 359 “Voters” That Hasn’t Existed for 10 Years Are Still Registered There "Here's an address that hasn't existed for 10 years." 359 "voters" are still registered there My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theu rumble.com
Wisconsin- MASSIVE Amounts of Voters Registered In Small Living Areas Revealed 2 bedroom apartment has 26 registered "voters" 16 unit building with 290 registered "voters" Single family home with 19 registered "voters" "We've found tens of thousands of these." My Website tracks rumble.com
Wisconsin- Instances Where ONE Voter Was Assigned 28 DIFFERENT ID NUMBERS! Instances of one voter assigned 28 different voter ID numbers My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on rumble.com
Wisconsin- 5.6% Illegal Votes From Voters Who Moved & Phantom Votes= 165,000 Illegal Votes Rock County, WI 5.6% illegally cast ballots from voters who moved and phantom votes Extrapolates to 4,795 in one county "Even if we're off by 50%, which I know we're not, I go over these numbers every rumble.com
Wisconsin- 3,713 "Voters" Registered to Vote From U.S. Post Offices 3,713 "voters" registered to Vote From U.S. post office My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on TG at rumble.com
Wisconsin- 113 Ballots were Cast From The SAME ADDRESS, Where NO ONE LIVED! 113 ballots were cast from address where no one lives My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on TG at t. rumble.com
Wisconsin- 1.5 MILLION Illegal Voter Registrations and 155,000 Suspected FAKE Ballots 1.5 million illegal voter registrations 155,000 suspected fake voters "Well over -- well over -- 50,000 illegally cast ballots that we can prove" from Nov. 3, 2020 My Website tracks election fraud and rumble.com
HUGE! Over 50,000 Fraudulent Votes Cast from Phantom Voters Identified in Wisconsin HUGE! Over 50,000 Fraudulent Votes Cast from Phantom Voters Identified in Wisconsin More than twice the margin on Nov. 3 My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exe rumble.com
Wisconsin: How They Cheated. Dirty Voter Rolls, Mass Mail In Ballots, Traffickers, NGO’s, Drop Boxes Wisconsin: How They Did It. Dirty Voter Rolls, Mass Mail In Ballots, Traffickers, NGO’s, Drop Boxes Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. ww.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at rumble.com
Wisconsin Bombshell: Election Bribery Scheme Discovered in Wisconsin Supreme Court Race Wisconsin Bombshell: Election Bribery Scheme Discovered with Wisconsin Takes Action Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Soci rumble.com
Wisconsin- Double Voting Occurring With Same Voter Registration With Different Voter ID Numbers Double votes! Countless examples of same exact voter registration, with different voter ID numbers My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www rumble.com
Wisconsin - A former USPS employee blows the whistle on 100,000 missing Wisconsin ballots Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Wisconsin: 138 Ballot Traffickers Went to Drop Boxes 3,568 Times Wisconsin: 138 Ballot Traffickers Went to Drop Boxes 3,568 Times Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. ww.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find me on rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

In Conclusion: I hope you enjoyed this thread. Our elections are obviously not safe and secure. May God bless us and guide us out of this mess we have found ourselves in. 🙏

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Forgot this one 🚨 Fulton County, Georgia admitted they didn’t do Signature Verification AT ALL, in the 2020 Election https://rumble.com/v4gsynq-fulton-county-admitted-they-didnt-do-signature-verification-in-fulton-count.html • They have an electronic verification system, but they admitted they did not use it. • They admitted they have records of voter signatures, but did not use it. • They have records of voter signatures, but they admitted they did not use them. • They’re essentially saying they could check their records but they’re saying it would take forever. This video is from a hearing to talk about the subpoenas that Harrison Floyd put together to get election evidence… His attorneys said what if we prove Trump won, Trumps RICO case goes away. The Georgia Secretary State agreed to comply with the subpoena and now Fulton County has self-incriminated themselves. BOOM. 💥

Fulton County admitted they didn’t do Signature Verification in Fulton County at all in 2020 Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Saved - July 6, 2024 at 10:23 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

IT expert, after gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion Rigging Management System in Mesa County Colorado, demonstrates how your government was overthrown on Nov 3, 2020, https://t.co/zTCWXoLR0z

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch thousands of votes from Trump to Biden using a backdoor utility in the Dominion election management system. The tool allows them to change the results without leaving a trace. In Pennsylvania, live TV footage shows nearly 20,000 votes being switched from Trump to Biden, resulting in Trump losing almost 40,000 votes. The manipulation occurs within minutes, highlighting vulnerabilities in the voting system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Being awarded to Biden and Jorgensen's totals being awarded to Trump. After gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by simply changing the index number next to each candidate's name. Speaker 1: This is a a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio that is actually installed on the image of the voting system. Speaker 0: So is it certified? Speaker 1: It is not on the list of certified software. What I'm gonna do first, I'm just gonna pull up the presidential results in Mesa County for that election. And here they are. You can see Biden has 31, 000, Trump has 56, 000. So I'm gonna come up here now, and I'm going to make a quick change. Change that. You change that to a 2? Yep. I'm changing Trump to a 1. K. And then I'm going to come up here, and I'm gonna rerun it. Report. And there you go. Biden, 56, 000. Trump, 31, 000. So I just flipped the results of the election using a tool that's actually built in to the voting system. And what I did is not even logged. There's no trace of what I just did now. For some reason, the logging of activities by a user that has the password are not retained. Speaker 0: In Pennsylvania on live TV, Trump had 1, 690, 000 589 votes, while Biden had 1, 252, 537 votes. The time was approximately 1108 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump's votes decreasing to 1, 670, 631, and Biden's votes increasing to 1, 272, 495. The time is approximately 11:0:9 PM. Live on CNN, exactly 19, 958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden. This means Trump lost 30 9, 916 votes.
Saved - October 15, 2024 at 12:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across some alarming information regarding election fraud from Patrick Byrne. A video reveals that Waukesha County, WI, and several counties in PA and IL are using a corrupt ballot printer, Michigan Election Resources (MER), which has been overprinting ballots. They printed extra ballots and allegedly sold them to illicit parties. A truck driver, Jesse Morgan, discovered filled-out fraudulent ballots while trying to deliver a load in Lancaster, PA. The evidence suggests a coordinated effort involving unions and the US Postal Service, with implications of larger entities like BlackRock.

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

Explosive election fraud information from Patrick Byrne. Most shocking video I have seen about election fraud in the last four years. Waukesha County WI using corrupt ballot printer to have ballots printed. As is Delaware and Lancaster counties PA, DuPage county IL Michigan Election Resources (MER) in Kalamazoo, MI had/has ballot printing contracts for several counties across the USA. What they have been doing is overage printing, i.e. a county orders 300,000 ballots yet MER would then print 325,000. Selling the extra 25,000 to the bad guys. Michigan Election Resources Printing Services Kalamazoo, MI 100 followers 11-50 employees (from their LinkedIn page) Image attached is from one of their proposals, using the four counties named above as references. MER prints for numerous counties across the nation. This is what truck driver Jesse Morgan was hauling: a batch of these illegal ballots. From New York down to Lancaster, PA. But he was the wrong driver/truck and the paperwork was messed up, he could not unload. That is when he opened up the back of the truck and discovered the filled out ballots. Kicker: he was in Lancaster PA to drop the load of fraudulent ballots to the Postal Service. That is how they were getting the phony ballots back into the system. The election clerks would see the US Postal Stamp on mail coming into them and have no clue the ballots were in fact fraudulent. Unions filling out ballots! in video @SEIU US Postal Service deleted volumes of evidence - in video. @USPS BlackRock behind it! in video @BlackRock How many counties did MER print extra ballots for?? 25min video link, must watch big part of how the 2020 election was stolen: Source of information is discovery in a federal lawsuit still ongoing in Washington DC, link to case: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63178307/della-rocca-v-united-states-postal-service/ @PatrickByrne @EmeraldRobinson @BehizyTweets @nataliegwinters @AsheinAmerica

DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 - CourtListener.com Docket for DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. courtlistener.com

@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne

Royal Flush: a brisk walk-through of USPS corruption of election 2020, our FOIA case regarding it, and our emergency injunction against USPS this week. Our original FOIA case seeking USPS 2020 records: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63178307/della-rocca-v-united-states-postal-service/ A good synopsis can be found in the attached post. https://x.com/PatrickByrne/status/1845275341742395467/video/1

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, a ballot printing company allegedly printed extra ballots beyond their contracts, shipping them to Flushing, NY, where they were filled out, then sent to Bethpage, NY, to be reintegrated into the mail system. Truck driver Jesse Morgan reported transporting a truckload of these ballots to Lancaster, PA. This truck may have contained 1 to 1.5 million ballots, and there were 8 other trucks. The Postal Service changed its document retention policy from 6 years to 90 days before the election, allegedly destroying relevant documents, then changed it back. This change was approved by Judge Emmett Sullivan. For 4 years, there has been a fight to find out who paid for the trucks. The Postal Service has resisted providing this information, even with judicial orders. A case was filed against the Postal Service in Maryland, arguing they cannot be involved in elections due to their actions in 2020. An emergency injunction was sought, and a hearing is scheduled. The aim is to demand radical transparency from the Postal Service regarding ballot movement or to prevent their involvement in the election altogether.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, team Freedom. Patrick here. It's about time I come clean about the postal service, lawsuits we have. There's now 2 of them, and I may as well just review this briskly. In 2020, you may remember a whistleblower came forward named Jesse Morgan. It was a trucker who said that he had been given a strange trucking load, and he looked into it and he found some funny things. I'm gonna walk you through what what really happened there. What really happened there is this. When I built Overstock, we had an issue where sometimes you would buy what you try not to, but you would get great goods. And this is how that work. And believe me, this will transport directly over and translate directly into discussing, ballots. Somebody would go North Face would go to Taiwan and have some factory make 10,000 sleeping bags for them. North Face, you know, under license in North Face, so forth. That factory would stay open an extra weekend and run another 2,000 sleeping bags. And then they would go into the market and sell them as North Face sleeping bags. Now and you you were at a great price and as a discount as, you know, we would buy them. Well, it turns out and but it would turn out that they weren't well, they were forensically, they were North Face. It was the same factory, the same paperwork, the same labels, the same employees had done it. They were not actually produced under license to North Face, and so that was called gray goods. And keeping that stuff out of our supply chain was a full time job for 1 Water. Was always looking at paperwork. Well, in the creation of ballots, the same thing happened in 2020. There was a ballot company in Michigan who won a bunch of contracts to to print ballots for this county and that county all over America, about 20 different states. What they were doing, was they were if they got a contract to print 200,000 ballots for 1 county, they would print up 300,000 and take those extra 100,000, and they would ship them off to Europe, to to, Europe, to New York, to a place called Flushing, New York, which has has a long history with a radical left. There was a facility there, a 100 people in a room associated with a union called SEIU, filling those ballots out. And the same thing was going on with all the counties that this that this printing company in Michigan supplied. So these people would fill them out a very well organized effort. We'd be filling them out, and then they were sent to Bethpage, New York. And at Bethpage, New York, there was a facility, on Grumman Road, I believe it was called, where these were taken and they were re they they were reintegrated into the mail. They were integrated into the mail system as possible. Now the Bethpage, New York facility is a postal, station, but it's not set up to handle 1st class mail and ballots of 1st class mail. And if you're gonna handle 1st class mail, you need something called an Oregon machine. But they don't have an Oregon machine. But they were handling 1st class mail, and they were putting them in gaylords. What is a gaylord? A gaylord there's a picture of a gaylord on the front of this, associated with this video. A gaylord is a a box or a big canvas shopping version of a shopping cart, but much bigger. And it's on wheels, 4 wheels. And anytime you do warehouse work where you're moving lots of letters or packages, they get put in things called gaylords, and then you move these boxes on wheels. Is it worth to think of them as very big shopping carts made sometimes made out of with canvas walls on wheels, and that's what you move around the warehouse. So each gaylord holds 50 to a 100000 ballots. Between October 18th October 21, 2020, 8 get, trucks came in from a company called area trucking area road and trucking, and they were filled up with gaylords, 20 to 30 gaylords, and sent on their way to Lancaster, PA. One day, a on one of those 3 days in late in mid late October 2020, a trucking company, a different trucking company, it's truck pulled in. It was called 10 road 10 roads trucking. 10 roads trucking. And and, driven by a guy named Jesse Morgan. And somebody at the facility made a mistake, and they loaded those ballots onto the wrong onto his truck, wrong company's truck. He got the paperwork and he said, truck this to Lancaster, PA. He trucked it to Lancaster, PA. That, that was the guy. His name was Jesse Morgan. That he got to Lancaster, PA. He was kept waiting for 6 hours because the paperwork wasn't from the right company and whatever who he went in the back of his truck and he found 20 gaylords. May have been 20 as much as 27 gaylords. Well, if each one holds if there were only 20 and each one held only 50,000, the truth is they can hold up to a 100,000 ballots. That well, 20 gaylords and 50,000 ballots. That's a 1000000 ballots. And by the way, these ballots, the envelope, they were filled in and the outside envelopes were signed. And that's because in this facility in Flushing, New York, there were a 100 union folks sitting there at tables filling out ballots for Joe Biden and signing the outside in the envelope. Of course, so that's that was the the supply chain that got them from a a printing company was that was deliberately printing up great goods, extra ballots, getting them to this left wing group in Flushing, New York who was filling them out and signing them to a for a postal facility in Bethpage, New York that wasn't supposed to be handling first class, mail, but yet it was handling ballots, which were first class mail, loading them into a truck, getting them to Lancaster, PA. And there, they were entering the mail system as mail in ballots. Well, that just that one Jesse Morgan truck had at least a 1000000 ballots in it. It may have had a 1000000 and a half ballots. And then he went back and he he looked at it, and that's what he found when he went back in. There were there were 20 to 27 gay boards each with 50 to a 100000 ballots. We could determine later by weight. And they, so a minimum of a million, probably more like a1000000 and a half ballots. And remember, that was one of 9 trucks. We know there were 8 other trucks from some other company. So 8 or 9 times a1000000 is 8 to 9000000, but it may have been 9 times a 1000000 and a half or more. So maybe more like 12, 13,000,000 ballots or re mailing ballots were integrated into the mail system through this this chain that I just described. And that's just in the north. We think there was something similar going on in the south and this involving a company called Runback. Different story. But that's what happened in 2020. And that's the that's this whistleblower who came forward. Now that whistleblower came forward and he told this story. He was immediately picked up by the feds, held in some, you know, basement for 9 hours, questioned. And the feds came out with a piece of paper saying he just signed something that retracted the statement he he gave him. He immediately came out and said, look, I was in the underground with these feds, and they berated me for 9 hours to get me to retract my story. At a recent point, they said they were gonna kill me and my family or something. And at that point to get out of it, I said I withdraw, but and I signed something that says I'd take this back. That was so I didn't get killed in this basement. I came out and I'm telling you folks the truth. That absolutely was the truth, what I had to say. We investigated that and we had the wonderful John Bornahan, part of the America project, as a 25 year federal officer from the DEA, but now he's in a private kind of a specialty practice. And he does odd investigations. We have affidavits from people who were involved, people who worked in the in the Bethpage facility. We have the whole chain of command mapped out. But the last thing we needed was, okay, tell us who paid for those trucks. Now it gets interesting. So now I'm giving you a history. If you've been following my videos over the years, you will have heard a lot of this, maybe not all of it. I've never really deliberately never really put it all together for everybody because I've given you this history and then giving you a new development in the last month that's big. So for 4 years, we fought with the postal service to say, okay. Who paid for that truck? Somebody paid for those trucks. And, you know, we think it was the DNC or it's gonna be turned out to be Kleiner Perkins and some DNC front company paid for all this. They have fought turning that over like it's the nuclear codes to turn over that information. In the process of the postal service turning fighting to turn that over, some really funny things came out. One of them is that federal agencies so federal postal service takes a picture of every first class mail that comes through. There's a digital picture. There's huge server farms the postal service maintains where everything's really recorded. All the movement of every piece of paper. If we're correct, there's 10 to 12, 13,000,000 ballots out there, which there will be no digital photos for of how they of how they got it. If they really got into the system naturally, people just turning them in, there would be they would've there'd be a digital photo trail along the way of all of those ballots. There is none because they didn't they're not legitimate. They they were created like I just described, taken to a not to a postal facility not legally able to handle 1st class mail and reintegrated into the mail system as I just described. They they would provide no information on the background of those 12,000,000 ballots and in including who paid for the trucking. Because if it turns out it was the DNC or Kleiner Perkins who paid for those trucks, then that kinda answers everything. Well, the the branches of the parts of the executive branch, they all have what you're talking about the IRS, you're talking about the EPA. They all have a documents retention policy just like any company does. And then publicly traded company has to maintain all documents for 6:6 years. So if a if a lawsuit comes in or the SEC comes in, you can sort of recreate everything that's happened in every part of the company for 6 years. And that's what the federal government has. In 2020, in March or April of 2020, 9 months before the election, the postal service changed their document retention policy. How long they keep documents From a 6 year look back to a 90 day look back. K? 90 days, maybe even 30 days on some types of things. They got through and they now they got through the election, got 30 to 90 days out destroyed, claimed to have destroyed all their documents related to the election. And then they changed their look back policy to 6 years again. They changed it from 6 years to 90 days, got into during 2020, got through the election, got everything destroyed, and then changed it back to 6 years. Well, there's something called the Administrative Procedures Act. I think it's 1971, which says when a federal agency changes some administrative procedure, how it works is it publishes to the public, we're considering changing some rule. And the public has 60 days to study it and 30 days to write their their feelings about that and what they want. And then the agency has, you know, it's this very formal process. It has 30 days where they come back and they propose a new rule and then the public has another comment period. And then finally, the agency publishes its rule. They didn't do any of that as they change these procedures. The only way they can get around doing those things is the administrative procedures act does allow for a a regulator or administrative part of the government to change its procedures without going through that rigmarole if they get the sign off of a federal judge. And the postal service has, in fact, in 2020, gotten the sign off of a federal judge. That federal judge is Emmett Sullivan. And if you've been paying attention, Emmett Sullivan is the very strange judge who oversaw the Mike Flynn fiasco for the DOJ where they hounded Mike Flynn, a decorated 3 star general. They hounded him for 3 4 4 years, 5 years, saying, they they hounded him. He, at at one point, the media was actually say, well, he plead guilty. He did submit a guilty plea for when they for a nothing burger offense when they threatened his son with 25 years. But he got into it and he withdrew the guilty plea. The media will never tell you that. He withdrew withdrew the guilty plea, fought it on. Eventually, the DOJ got a retired judge to come in and look at the whole case. They said this whole case is trumped up. It should never been brought. But this guy, Emmett Sullivan, he'd never accepted the guilty plea, which is why when people say, Flynn is a convicted felon. He's not a convicted felon. He submitted a guilty plea to a felony. The judge didn't accept it. The judge savored it like a fine wine and danced around for months. So the media could say, we have a guilty plea from from Michael Flynn. Well, because he took so long, that gave Michael Flynn time as he learned more and in particular learned how crooked the case was that had been fabricated against him. He withdrew the guilty plea. So they that judge never accepted the guilty plea, which means Mike Flynn is not. Like, he was never convicted. He may never accepted the plea. They fought it on and a retired judge from Saint Louis or somebody came in and looked at it all and said this whole thing is a big lark and the DOJ and they should never been brought and the DOJ dropped the case. That's the judge, Emmett Sullivan, who refused to let it drop and said, well, I'm gonna prosecute Michael Flynn. Well, that's not how prosecutions work. The judge is a the neutral judge and the government brings a case and there's the defendant. A judge in American history has never said I'm gonna run my own prosecution of this guy. It was ridiculous. And that went on until Trump pardoned this kangaroo pardon him out of this kangaroo court situation. That's and it's Sullivan. That's the same judge who signed off in 2020 on this Mickey Mouse behavior from the postal service that let them destroy their records. I've just summarized a 4 year multimillion dollar fight, multimillion dollar fight, 2, $3,000,000 fight. You know, people wonder what the what the American project does. It funds so many things like this. It fund so many things like this. That but that's and and now I'll be putting it online either I'll be putting it online probably on Telegram is where I put a bunch of documents. I'll attach what I can to this local's broadcast. The they finally in, like, September put well, actually, finding that out, I'll tell you this with the postal service. It was so clear they were in the wrong that eventually, the they got a lawyer not from the chief legal counsel of the US Postal Service. All we had was a FOIA case, a Freedom of Information Act case in Washington DC set telling us saying, who paid for those trucks? You know, somebody pays for them. 10 roads, trucking area, trucking didn't didn't just do that on their own. Somebody paid for those trucks. Finally, judges, I mean, Obama appointees and and democratic judges who were involved in the process were telling the postal service you have to turn that information over. But somewhere in there, the postal service finally turned over, and they kept saying we don't have the information. We don't have the information. We were able to prove they did. They had it. There were different ways it was buried. They finally turned over a sheet about the billings from that facility on on those three dates in October of 2020. It was, like, 9th 18th 19th 20th, I think. And they had whited out those 3 dates. They and and then they ended up saying, we will we will not turn over not even with a judicial order, we will not turn over information for those 3 dates. So and in a normal world, that would be proof of guilt, you know, long ago proof of guilt. Their own DOJ attorneys let us know and let in filings, they were ordering their their people, their client, in this case, the US Postal Service, to turn the information over and the client just wouldn't return wouldn't turn it over. Finally, we got an affidavit filed in September of this year from some guy who oversees the and I'll I'll include as much of this as I can in the, in the notes that you can look at these things yourself. An affidavit saying we don't have the data. Well, at this point, there's a judge, Daphne Daphne Friedman in Washington DC who's had enough, and she clearly doesn't believe. And there is nothing I mean, there's nothing to believe. They've just stonewalled us and the judicial system for 4 years turning over simple information, which makes us really confident what that information is, is something like who paid for that trucking that was is gonna turn out to be Kleiner Perkins or some other democratic front paid for that. And and, so, boom, that is background. We filed a case in late August, again, in May in, Maryland with a federal judge in Maryland against the postal service saying, look, they clearly cheated. They cheated on all these FOIA responses. They've been hiding this information. They're lying. They're clearly lying because we've, time and again, we've proven that they have information that they claim they didn't have. And so we finally went to the postal service 2 months ago and said I mean, we went to the judiciary 2 months ago and said the postal service cannot be involved in an election. Given what they did in 2020 and given how they've stonewalled and buried and refused to answer these questions, they're clear. And there's so many, so much evidence, including the affidavits we have from people in that chain of command. They cannot be involved in the election in 2020. Incidentally, it's unconstitutional unconstitutional. You cannot have any part of the executive branch of the federal government involved in an election. That's like really clear law. And yet, so everything they've done and, of course, since Biden came to power, he created a special division of the postal service to be involved in elections. That's unconstitutional. So we brought all this, including the postal services' crooked behavior over the preceding 4 years to a federal judge in Maryland and said and join them from being involved in this election. That judge has taken this very seriously. They tried to get it dismissed. It wasn't dismissed. And now that Georgia's ordered judges ordered on Thursday or Friday, 2 days ago, we called for a an emergency injunction against the postal service, and the judge has granted it. So coming up, I believe, early this week, there is an there's a hearing on a federal judges injunction against telling the postal service they can't be involved in this election. Well, given how close we are to the election, it's highly unlikely the judge is going to go along with that remedy. But a lesser remedy is to say, okay. Then you have to demand radical transparency right now out of the postal service on all the movement of everything ballot related for this election. Otherwise, we're going to just they're just gonna stuff like crazy the mail in ballots and present us with a fait accompli like they did in 2020. And no one will have any reason to judge to to trust these elections. So you just have to demand radical judge. You have to order immediately on an emergency injunction, radical transparency into the everything in the postal service involved with moving ballots. That's where things stand. That was filed on Thursday or Friday. I believe it was granted. I believe this week, there is an emergency hearing in a Maryland court. By the way, the head of the Postal Service lives at the the postmaster general lives in Maryland, and that gives us reason to to have filed this in Maryland. And my understanding is we have a judge, not a friendly judge in Maryland, but a non crooked judge in Maryland. And he's taking the postal services trying to get this kicked out or squashed, and the judge is having none of it. So there's a hearing coming up this week in a federal courtroom in Maryland where we're asking a judge at the very least. I mean, what you really should do is just say you cannot be involved in any election, which is incidentally what the con what the law and the constitution says. But if he's not gonna do something that extreme of remedy this late in the game, he certainly is, has the capacity to change things by demanding radical transparency immediately within the postal service for inspection, for any any movement of balance in this election. So I have given that as tersely and concisely as I can. I will attach to my low I'll put this up in locals. I'll put up other places too, but I will attach to it links to, associated reading for further reading. Okay? So sorry we've been playing this this so close to the vest. I've spoken for a long time of a royal flush. This has been the royal flush. And the ace was finding out I mean, we actually put together. We know where those fake ballots well, that's just a thing. They weren't fake ballots. They were ballots printed in a real printing company that was in on it is in on the fix up in Michigan. And just like that, when I give you the North Face tent exam or sleeping bag example from Taiwan, those sleeping bags aren't fake. But in the sense, they're fake. They're just not you you see what I mean? They're fake. That mean they're manufactured out of license. That what makes them very good. Well, our system is awash in very good balance. They don't have to be made in China. This stuff about them being printed in China, back in 2020, I don't know if any of that's true. Although we did see place where there were Chinese indications of Chinese printing, but the the main event is not that they're printed somewhere else. They can be printed in the actual facility that's supposed to be printed in ballots, but they're just doing overruns and they're using those overruns to feed into the system this way. We have we know what happened in 2020. The only parts we don't know are the parts that they have broken the law by erasing, by shielding, by stonewalling for 4 years for 4 years. And shame on the federal judiciary. This has only happened because it's taken 4 years and they still, through their mechanism, could not get let us get to the bottom, to the true bottom of anything. But given the behavior of the postal service, it's clear that they were involved in massive, you know, fraud on a 10 to 13,000,000 vote level back in 2020. I think they're stepping it up for this election. That so this is the hijacking of the country gets complete if it isn't stopped, and it has to be stopped right now. And we have all the information in if you for further reading. And it is now in front of a federal judge in Maryland seeking we're we're seeking at least a federal injunction against demanding radical transparency, if not eliminating the postal service from this game at all, which is really what the right the right solution is. Okay? So further reading attached. I'll put up this video a few places. If you want the the the links for further reading, you have to find my locals account. Okay. Patrick Byrne signing off.
DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 - CourtListener.com Docket for DELLA ROCCA v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 1:22-cv-00786 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. courtlistener.com
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 4:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers on strategies discussed by activist Lisa Fithian for taking over government buildings and disrupting critical infrastructure. Fithian emphasizes using trained groups to mobilize protests, wearing disguises, and targeting media outlets for communication. Plans include civil disobedience to impede Congress and coordinating actions similar to Hong Kong protests. Internal documents reveal a strategy for a Capitol takeover on January 6th, with ties to various political organizations and figures, highlighting a premeditated approach to civil unrest.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Fithian talked about taking over government buildings: "Trump's gotta go. In order to achieve what they did, they knew they had to take over important government buildings.” "But, like, there may be some people that are willing to break the windows to get into the government buildings. Like, if that's what we need to do, then we shouldn't fight about that. Let's do that. Let's take over the buildings."

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Steps For Carrying Out The Plan: Fithian discusses using trained anchor affinity groups and forming flying squads to absorb unknowing protestors in the streets and move them towards the government building they plan to take over. https://t.co/0m503Ymljv

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Taking Over Inside Spaces: Fithian shows images of the WI Capitol in which protesters took it over and staged protests inside the building. https://t.co/8IFGQRbI0X

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Commitments To Not Deploy The National Gaurd: Fithian repetitively stressed the importance of getting allied Democrats in positions of power to agree to not deploy the National Gaurd. https://t.co/NZafz4kD2z

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Sharing Maps and Identifying Targets: ShutDown DC distributed and displayed an ArcGIS map that highlighted their targets including the U.S. Capitol, RNC HQ, DNC HQ, and Trump boosters. https://t.co/C80HvztvV9

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Wearing Disguises: During the session Fithian instructed on wearing disguises, altering their appearances, and keeping a change of clothes in their bags to put on a different colored shirt if things "get crazy". https://t.co/crU2YuknXI

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Taking over a TV or radio stations: Fithian proposed the idea of taking over media outlets as a way to communicate with the public and rally more supporters to their cause. https://t.co/iByfQEu44S

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Disrupting Critical Infrastructure: Discussions also included disrupting transportation networks, aiming to immobilize movement in and around DC, and crippling critical infrastructure that the government needs to maintain power. https://t.co/z7OKtK3wX6

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Target Republicans or Democrats To Force Trump Out "Maybe it's a narrow Biden victory, and Trump is not conceding. Maybe it's targeting Republicans and telling them it's time to get him to go." "If let's say there's a narrow Trump victory, we might have to pivot. And at that point, we might need to say we need to target the Democrats and make sure Biden does not concede."

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

ShutDown DC shared their target list amongst their groups called "DC Opportunities 2". https://t.co/aidLKoIXTV

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Hong Kong Style Riot Tactics: Fithian discussed using Hong-Kong Style tactics and trained participants in the methods used, many of which being illegal. https://t.co/6mPzyecro9

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

"So Hong Kong taught us a lot about mass uprising because, again, this is not we're not talking about a protest moment." Image shared in the video of Hong Kong attire https://t.co/3wMCjEsM2w

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Multiple Affinity Groups In Action: Fithian shows pictures of her previous civil disobedience actions that she planned using her many affinity groups including a veterans group holding American flags. https://t.co/Hejl705huz

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Lisa Fithian - Meet Professor Occupy In an article entirely about Lisa Fithian, Mother Jones wrote, The Mother Jones article asserts that Lisa Fithian is paid to run demonstrations and instruct activist groups, this begs the question, was Fithian being paid to train activists to take over government buildings? And if so, by who?

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

MSNBC covered a large disorderly protest lead by Lisa Fithian in the Texas Capitol in 2013 featured a photograph Fithian. https://t.co/58i17Q1Meh

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

May 1st, 2024, Fithian lead pro-palestine protestors in large scale campus take overs in coordinated, text book, Fithian fashion. Here's Fithian directing "presumed students" to chain metal tables to the University's doors to form blockades. https://t.co/TFOfKG0MDa

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

The recent university protests were widely perceived as organic, primarily led by Palestinians and students supporting Gaza. However, with Lisa Fithian and her group orchestrating the actions, it’s clear these events were highly coordinated and pre-planned by agitators. https://t.co/ySxxJNzWKb

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Internet sleuths identified rioter Maple Osterbrink at the UNC campus take over. Osterbrink was a participant on Fithian's Zoom meeting that discussed taking over government buildings. https://t.co/n8W72V9jFb

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Below is a screen shot of some participants on ShutDown DC's zoom meeting hosted by Lisa Fithian. Maple Osterbrink can be seen on the far right third row. https://t.co/fJo99qVCqL

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Inspection of online activity of participants in Fithian's Zoom calls revealed heavy involvement in the 2023-2024 pro-Palestine protests across the country. Many participants on Fithian’s calls were members of left-leaning Jewish non-profits, with their social media accounts showing their active roles in the recent pro-Palestine demonstrations.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

If Lisa Fithian and her group dress as Palestinians, wearing kufiya scarves and waving Palestinian flags to create ambiguity in the public perception of these protests, it's reasonable to assume they may have used other disguises in the past to further their political agenda.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Internal Documents Reveal Plans To Take Over The Capitol On January 6th A pdf. titled "The Count" was shared in the groups "Stopping The Coup Guide/Movement Resources". It outlines a contingency plan on Jan. 6th to stage protests inside the US Capitol to make it physically impossible for Congress to meet or vote.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Written by: Becky Bond- Senior Advisor of Bernie Sanders presidential campaign, Real Justice Pac Zack Malitz- Digital Organizing Director Bernie 2016, Beto For Texas, Real Justice Pac Brandon Evans- Democratic Strategist, Political Director of Real Justice PAC https://t.co/kIAov3OFH5

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Two authors of "The Count" sit on the board of The Real Justice PAC, one is its Political Director. https://t.co/evYVKHGzYb

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

The Real Justice Pac endorsed and helped elect NY DA Alvin Bragg who brought politically motivated criminal charges against former President Trump. https://t.co/2dvBrFklII

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

The Count, dated 10.14.20 predicted a huge rise in mail-in ballots and election issues, which could lead to Trump contesting the results. They feared a Constitutional Crisis where neither candidate gets the 270 electoral votes and then the election would be decided by 1 vote per state, thus Trump would win.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Constitutional Crisis Scenarios: Zack Malitz discusses what will happen if neither candidate receives 270 Electoral College votes, triggering the decision to fall to the House, where state delegations would cast votes, likely favoring Trump. https://t.co/8QlTO1FueQ

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Capitol Take Over Strategy For January 6th: Authors Zack Malitz and Becky Bond discuss using civil disobedience and other tactics to interfere in the electoral college vote count on January 6th. https://t.co/yyqkjaXOur

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Page 37 of "The Count" restates a contingency plan to, "Lead the public in staging mass civil disobedience protests in the Capitol with the goal of making it impossible for Congress to meet or vote." https://t.co/fA1mKIKNc0

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Sunrise Movement's Office Take Overs Guide The "Sunrise Office Visit Takeover" guide was distributed amongst the Sunrise Movement and allied affinity groups. Sunrise Movement was part of the "Protect The Results" Coalition. It's members were on the October 21st, 2020 Zoom call training to take over government buildings with Lisa Fithian. Sunrise was also on the Election Disruption spokes council hosted by ShutDown DC.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Sunrise Movement Taking Over Nancy Pelosi's Office Video: https://t.co/HkpmKMtZty

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Sunrise: Burning Buildings Is A Powerful Form Of Protest "Uprisings, including actions like burning buildings are legitimate and powerful forms of resistance. https://t.co/0ScptlSxYW

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Representative Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has participated in the Sunrise Movements Zoom Calls on occasion, showing her support and allegiance. In reciprocation, AOC is backed and endorsed by the Sunrise Movement. https://t.co/o7ZVuwWFhY

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Sharing an internal security suard manual on securing government facilities in their "Dealing With Threats" guide https://t.co/McfINJ5nqX

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

"Federal Protective Service Security Guard Information Manual on Secure Facilities and Safe Occupants" labeled as "For Official Use Only" https://t.co/qKFNk9V2VQ

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

ShutDown DC leaders shared a target list they created. The Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee Headquarters in Washington D.C. were both on the target list. https://t.co/Vr5eRIMrCq

Saved - November 5, 2024 at 11:20 PM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Top Law Expert Reveals Why The Democrats Can't Steal The Election Like They Did in 2020. Watch And Share The Live Feed Of The Election Coverage Here: https://t.co/SvmawgYDmy https://t.co/xbbpQYwziR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The landscape has changed since 2020, with courts now compelled to act on clear evidence of election irregularities, like early voting shutdowns. Unlike before, social media platforms aren't under strict control, allowing for greater exposure of potential fraud. The presence of alternative platforms like Rumble and the reach of figures like Bongino highlight this shift. With millions accessing information in real-time, the courts can no longer ignore blatant misconduct. The spotlight on these issues is stronger than ever, making it difficult for any attempts at election manipulation to go unnoticed. As we approach the 2024 elections, there's a sense of optimism that the increased transparency will lead to fairer outcomes. The call to action is clear: share information widely to ensure everyone is informed about the ongoing developments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So they don't have the, the cloak of darkness that they had in terms of suppression of social media platforms like they had in 2020. And the courts can't run and hide and say latches or a standing. Yeah. They have to get involved right away when it's on video. A cop telling people, sorry, we're shutting down early voting at 145 when it's supposed to go to 4:30. You're damn right. You're gonna get a judge who's gonna say, what do you want me to do? Even if I were corrupt, I cannot be corrupt now. Speaker 1: Judges ordering the millions of, you know, names that we know are illegals and others to be released. Judges saying, no. You can't keep counting ballots, you know, that aren't postmarked after the election. I mean, there's a lot more wins than there are losses. We we have Nevada saying they can keep going for days with unpostmarked ballots, but in the aggregate and and Roger Stone's the expert. He he he agrees with me. There was almost no defense for fraud 4 years ago. Now we are like flies on, you know what, on their ass. I mean, we are on their ass. They're they're kicking out poll watchers. Lawyers come. They're being forced back in. They're catching them flipping votes everywhere. They're catching them pulling Republican votes off, putting Democrats on in Houston, putting it back on. I mean, we are on their ass. And it's not just the Republicans with Trump finally in control of much of the RNC with his daughter-in-law doing a great job from, you know, 0 resistance. So I'd say, you know, 60% resistance is what they should be doing. But there are all these grassroots legal groups and people just kicking ass, just killing it. Speaker 0: It it is what's what's amazing, and I had thought about this as well. Yeah. It seems that the courts have stepped up, and I'll put it in quotes because I don't think they stepped up. I think they've been forced to step up, to actually do the right thing this time around. Because you look at the tools and you look at the players. In 2020, you had a controlled Twitter. You did not have a free Twitter. You had, intelligence censorship. You had government interfering with with private enterprise or social media platforms for government censorship. You don't have that now. They don't have those tools. So Twitter or commonly referred to as x, it's no longer under the control of a deep state of government apparatus. You got Rumble out there. And in as much as Rumble doesn't have the, you know, the the user base as a a YouTube, they've got the biggest tools to fight the public warfare, which is the, you know, the top podcasts that are reaching 100 of 1,000 and millions of people daily. You got Bongino. Bannon gets out of jail, crushes it on Rumble. So you've got the tools that are no longer the same as, you know, the hands tied behind the back back in 2020, and it puts the courts on absolute blast that they can't run and hide like they did in 2020. And so they have to step up and deal with the actual overt fraud. It was last week. Posobiec puts it on blast, you know, what's going on in Pennsylvania? And, shutting down early voting 3 hours early, you know, because it's a long and tedious, effort to vote early. Speaker 1: They were nailing it because we have some free press and spotlights. If you don't have lights on your car driving around the middle of the desert, you're gonna run to a sand dune. We've got lights now. And so they can't get away with it because it's red handed, red handed, red handed, red handed. And people had the machines flipping 4 years ago, but you couldn't put it on x or anywhere else. People had all this, but it would get shut down in the FBI when when the postal carrier would say, I was sitting there for 8 hours waiting for him and all these trucks were pulling up, pulling out the same packages. So I looked. There were tens of thousands of ballots just for Joe Biden, and it's all confirmed. The FBI comes and threatens him, and they take the press conferences down. Now they're not getting away with that because they don't have air superiority. Speaker 0: They don't have the monopoly over the airwaves anymore. And it's an amazing thing when when Musk was on Rogan and, you know, he's talking about having changed the course of the universe. When you have x reaching a 100,000 Americans, that that's more than all of MSM combined. Now admittedly, you're not a 1000000. Speaker 1: I mean, I mean, they're reaching No. Speaker 0: Did I say a 100 I said about a 100,000,000. I'm sorry. If I said a 100000, it's just Speaker 1: way more than a 100,000,000, brother. We're clocking some days on there. 40,000,000 people clicking on it and watching it. Speaker 0: I mean well, no. No. What I'm what I'm Alex, what I mean is Americans. You know, like, this is, you know, they reach a third of America at least, but say even more. Speaker 1: You're right. Speaker 0: They can't get away with it. And, you know, admittedly, they're reaching the left and the right. But they have, you know, not not they have full exposure. And so the courts can't run and hide and fight. Speaker 1: Major beachhead. A major beachhead. Yep. Speaker 0: And and you got Rumble. And you got Bongino who's getting 200,000 putting it on blast every day. So they don't have the, the cloak of darkness that they had in terms of suppression of social media platforms like they had in 2020. And the courts can't run and hide and say latches or standing. Yeah. They have to get involved right away when it's on video. A cop telling people, sorry. We're shutting down early voting at 145 when it's supposed to go to 4:30. You're damn right. You're gonna get a judge who's gonna say, what do you want me to do? Even if I were corrupt, I cannot be corrupt now. And what do they have? Today, some malfunctions. You know, they only have 4 years to prepare for this in Josh Shapiro's corrupt Pennsylvania state. From a government perspective, they're having malfunctioning software in what I looked up were predominantly Republican areas. I mean, if if it were not for the immediate real time full spotlight of social media and the 100 of millions of people that are being reached immediately through these platforms, they they would probably get away with it yet again. But it's a different ballgame now, and it's gonna be reflected in the results I am predicting and hoping and crossing my fingers and touching touching wood. Speaker 1: There's your headline. The x spotlight of truth, the mighty spotlight of x truth frustrates Democrats' plans to steal election in lifetime. I mean, it is. Folks, I know you know, listeners, but this is all I do. I was I worked, no exaggeration, 19 hours yesterday. I slept 4 hours, 4 and a half hours. Ladies and gentlemen, I just showed you a bunch of evidence that it is that it is unraveling in live time. We are routing them. Ladies and gentlemen, election day 2024 is here. Trump is gonna win big with her trying to steal it. We have got all the top experts, people on the ground, everything, giving us the key intel. If you're watching on X particularly, be sure and go to real Alex Jones and watch the live feed. Tens of millions are already on it and share with everyone you know. History is happening now. Go to real Alex Jones on our backup stream at infowarsonx@infowars.comforward/show and share those on your email, your text message on x. Share it everywhere and say, this is the real intel. This is the real election coverage. This is where you find out what's really happening. God bless you all. This is historic. Now go to the main feed, watch it, and share it because you are the Paul Revere's. You are the resistance.
Saved - January 16, 2025 at 4:30 AM

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

This is a presentation by Norm Eisen and Joanna Lydgate of States United discussing their “democracy” playbook. https://t.co/KjYjBBAYMb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The anti-democracy strategy in America has four main pillars. First, it undermines public trust in elections through misinformation and fake audits, leading to significant disbelief in election outcomes. Second, it attacks voting rights with numerous voter suppression bills targeting mail-in voting and drop boxes. Third, it criminalizes opposition, instilling fear in election officials and voters through laws that restrict basic election administration tasks. Finally, it hijacks elections by shifting control from nonpartisan officials to partisan actors, including dark money groups. To counter this, a proactive strategy is essential, focusing on enhancing public trust, expanding voting access, holding violators accountable, and protecting elections through comprehensive measures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An attempt, and it's just an attempt to kind of, map out what we think is happening here. And our view as an organization is that the anti democracy strategy right now in America has 4 basic pillars. The first pillar, as you see here, is really about undermining public trust. So keeping the big lie alive through things like these fake audits and these election investigations and, of course, an ongoing right wing media narrative. Why to make people not believe in our elections, not believe in our democratic institutions, and ultimately, of course, not, take advantage of the franchise. And it's it's successful. So the the polling we've done has been certainly really sobering. In recent polls in both Pennsylvania and Arizona, we found that about 40% of voters, do not believe that President Biden won fairly. And we have our communications director, Lizzie, communications director, Lizzie Ulmer, on so, for the Q and A, she can answer questions about sort of where the American people are right now, but, the numbers are still not good. You know, the big lie is definitely very much alive in this country. The second pillar is attacking the freedom to vote. So, you know, make people not believe and then attack the right itself. So we've seen, as you all know, hundreds of voter suppression bills across the country attacking things like vote by mail and drop boxes and prohibiting outside funding for elections. That, I think, is probably the most kind of well covered pillar in the media, the one people are most aware of. 3rd, much less well covered, is the criminalization of the opposition. So make people afraid to exercise their right, make people afraid to do the jobs of administering elections. And these are the kinds of bills we've seen that prohibit, criminalize the provision of water at polls or that criminalize the most routine aspects of election administration, making our local officials really terrified to do their jobs, that criminalize things like protests and ballot collection, etcetera. And then finally, the 4th pillar is what we call hijacking our elections. So Norm alluded to this when he talked about election subversion, but these are bills that really channel power over elections from trusted, officials who've always done this work and done it in a completely nonpartisan way into the hands of partisan actors. So partisan, hyper partisan state legislatures, most commonly. But it's also things like dark money groups coming in to fund these fake audits across the country. And of course, political violence is also on some level about, taking over, our elections. And, and Norm, I think you should talk about the the pro democracy strategy, our plan to attack this because, of course, that that is that is absolutely critical. Speaker 1: It would be a mistake, for us, and we don't, of course, operate alone. We work with, hundreds of folks, government officials across the country, but we do that, in, Alliance, in an ecosystem of, many other wonderful groups filling this this narrow but deep lane that really hadn't been filled before, providing support and leverage, to those officials. It would be a mistake in doing that work, only to defend as important as defense is. So the other thing that we're always cognizant of, and we really try to balance this every day in the work that we do, is the affirmative, strategy, to secure voting and to advance democracy, not just to hold on to push to new ground. We can talk more about it in the q and a, which is about 60 seconds away. Enhancing public trust by building bipartisan coalitions like the wonderful advisory committee, who you saw, expanding the freedom to vote by promoting federal and state expansion like our reports on the beneficial effect that the legislation, the latest version of which was just announced today in Washington, will have across the country. We broke it down state by state by state. You can see that on our website. Holding those naughty violators accountable, and we're gonna talk about that. There's some good q and a coming about coming for that. But we we have done a lot around the country to make sure, for example, that if lawyers are violating ethics rules, that they are held accountable for that. And finally, you have to protect elections and access by working on things like redistricting, pre election day, election day, and post election, which is what we did in 2020. We've kind of worked out the formula. So there is a pro democracy plan. Speaker 0: So we just threw a lot at you. This is our contact information. We would love to be in touch anytime. And, Sue
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 10:06 PM

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

Defending Against The Unseen - Preserving The Trump Presidency https://t.co/fYcdnJmy4M

Saved - March 30, 2025 at 5:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve identified key players involved in election fraud, particularly focusing on Huawei, UNESCO, and various individuals linked to them. Evidence suggests these entities have illegally accessed American election systems. Notably, figures like John Podesta and Amber McReynolds are tied to organizations that may compromise election integrity. There are connections to foreign interests, including Israel, and a network of corrupt officials across several states. The situation indicates a troubling partnership that threatens the integrity of our electoral process.

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

Not even necessary, @immutablechrist. We already have the “remote access/command” election fraudsters identified, thanks in large part to platforms like Maltego & AlienVault (CIA/CISA/NSA/Kleiner Perkins). It’s just a matter of citizens taking the appropriate legal action (or “other” measures) to obtain Constitutionally-protected due process and redress of grievances. (Cliffs: Huawei, UNESCO & Jews, among others.) 💥FUN FACT 1: David Becker (CEIR, ERIC, EOLDN, Pew Charitable Trusts) was previously the Director of People For the American Way (PFAW), a Jewish, anti-Christian organization which was created PRIMARILY to focus on REMOVING CHRISTIANS, CONSERVATIVES and NATIONALISTS and their respective ideologies from all aspects of political involvement and public influence. 💥FUN FACT 2: Tony Podesta (a Jew), the brother of Hillary Clinton associate and known pedo, John Podesta, was the PRESIDENT of People For the American Way (PFAW). 💥FUN FACT 3: Tony Podesta (Jew) was also hired as a lobbyist for… Huawei. 💥FUN FACT 4: We have the FORENSIC proof that both Huawei and UNESCO (UN/Levi Strauss/Haas family/ERIC) have been illegally accessing American elections networks and voter rolls/registration systems. We also have proof that Huawei and UNESCO ratified a formal working partnership with an objective to further Global Jewry’s “UN 2030 Sustainability Goals” horseshit agenda. 💥FUN FACT 5: We also know that John Podesta, President Bill Clinton’s former Chief of Staff and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Chair, is a Co-Founder and Board Member of an organization called Voter Information Project (formerly WVWV), while also being a Trustee of an International Crisis Group-linked and George Soros-funded organization tied to the 10/7 attacks, Res Publica (Avaaz/Hamas). 💥FUN FACT 6: We have the emails (from 2016) between John Podesta, Donna Brazile and Tony Macklerr, discussing a pre-elections meeting with George Soros to do some strategic “pre-programming” of voting machines in advance of the 2016 elections. We also know that Dominion Voting Systems uses Huawei Cloud as its official cloud network. 💥FUN FACT 7: John Podesta is also involved with the Mossad-run Protect Democracy Project’s organization called the Transition Integrity Project, which was established literally JUST BEFORE AMERICANS HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT COVID. Jen Granholm, the former Governor of Michigan and U.S. ENERGY SECRETARY under PRESIDENT BIDEN, was part of the Transition Integrity Project as well, while she also sat on the Board of Directors of Amber McReynolds’ National Vote at Home Institute. 💥FUN FACT 8: Amber McReynolds, the Vice Chairman of the USPS Board of Governors and CEO & Executive Director of National Vote at Home Institute, is also part of the Protect Democracy Project’s National Task Force for Elections Crises, where she serves alongside 2nd Gen Mossad operative and 9/11 co-conspirator, Michael Chertoff, Michael Chertoff’s wife, Meryl Chertoff (Executive Director of Aspen Institute), Larry Garber, the USAID Director of West Bank/Gaza Strategy and CEO of New Israel Fund, and a host of other Israeli/Global Jewry-loyal traitors involved with administration of our elections.

@immutablechrist - Christopher Gleason

@stephiebeltinck @JovanHPulitzer @sheriffdarleaf @MIGOP @ParikhClay @StefLambertEsq @ScottAughney Ask for the remote access logs

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

HUAWEI, UNESCO, ERIC & UKRAINE https://t.co/bT3oG9cp4m

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

They’re a match made in election fraud and kid trafficking heaven.🤦🏻‍♂️🤬🖕 https://t.co/c0xutkeVaV

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

More of those receipts https://t.co/ElGBtG3V13

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

And a few more of those receipts🫡 https://t.co/TIrbfcTfcG

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

More Amber McReynolds with several of our favorite corrupt MI, WI, NV, GA & CO elections officials we’ve all come to know and fucking hate. NOTE: As we demonstrated yesterday, Issue One is also a Protect Democracy Project program designed to help steal American elections on behalf of Israel’s best interests. The Issue One election fraud racket involves several elections officials in a number of key swing states (including AZ) and a number of cyber traitors from U.S. CYBER COMMAND (like Admiral Michael Rogers) who are owned by Mossad, IDF Unit 8200 & GCHQ.

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

Here’s the Huawei and UNESCO “2030 Agenda” partnership, and several states’ key elections networks that we now know were compromised via “Huawei Remote Command Execution” hacks of Dominion Voting Systems, Knowink Poll Pads, polling places and the elections networks themselves. And there’s Ron Raffensperger, CTO of Digital Transformation at Huawei (China), who may (quite literally) be related to both Brad Raffensperger and… Mitt Romney.🤣

Saved - April 8, 2025 at 6:48 AM

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

On November 9, 2020, Norm Eisen discussed a group he and others created to essentially stop Trump from contesting the results of the most secure election in the history of ever. I’m not sure what group this was. Might have been the Transition Integrity Project. https://t.co/U8SjwQGz8e

Video Transcript AI Summary
After finishing a book just before the election, Speaker 1 was approached by Democratic state AGs to address concerns about the upcoming election. This led to the formation of a bipartisan group, including governors, former DOJ officials, US attorneys, prosecutors, sheriffs, law enforcement, and state AGs, aimed at defending the election against anticipated attacks. The group was active in 25 states leading up to the election. Speaker 1 believes the election was free and fair, the votes were freely and fairly counted, and the margins in key states are clear. While acknowledging potential turbulence, disinformation, and litigation, Speaker 1 assesses that the election results will withstand challenges, in part because the margin of victory will be sufficiently large. Speaker 1 expresses hope that the country will return to normal and anticipates remarkable achievements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're working on efforts to stop president Trump from challenging the results of the election. Are you concerned that he may succeed, and and what's the strategy for preventing that? Speaker 1: Well, I've put in the chat. I don't know if everybody can see it though, maybe they can't get into the chat all of our visitors. So I've put into the chat a little description of my newest venture, I was very flattered to be approached in the I no sooner finished a case for the American people literally, I stayed up all night On Sunday night, it must have been the last August, September, October, November, it must have been the last night in Do you know when the book came out? Alan, do you remember what the date of the book release was? Well, it doesn't matter. Speaker 0: Let me look at my sales slip. Speaker 1: I stayed up, I stayed up all night to finish the book, we had a crash deadline on this book. And we finished the proofing the last of the proof sheets. And the book was in print. Three weeks later, it went straight to the printer and they rushed, rushed into print because we wanted to make the case in the run up to the election. And the book came out at the August. So no sooner did I finish that. So it must have been the very July, beginning of August, I literally was sitting on my couch, I had been finished, I had, I'd sitting there sleepless five minutes when I got a call from the representative of the Democratic state AGs. We have some questions about this coming election and one thing and another. Oh, yes. Okay. Shanley has sent it on to everyone. One thing led to another. And as you can see, we started a new bipartisan group, rule of law and law enforcement group governors, former DOJ officials, former US attorneys, prosecutors, state, current former sheriffs, law enforcement and state AGs to defend the election against just the kinds of attacks that we're seeing now big effort. We were active, we were active in 25 states in the run up to the election. And a couple links, you can see my board and a nice Washington Post article about the venture. So I assess that, you know, I was very nervous last week, as we were waiting for the election to be called. My assessment is that the that we will withstand the next sixty days, but I think that there, you know, there's a lot of flailing and failing going on on the litigation front. Because the truth is, we had a very free and fair election, we freely and fairly counted the votes, there's still some mop up, it's very clear what the margins are going to be in these states. And it's undisputed who the President-elect and Vice President-elect are. And I'm sad, I'm not surprised I warn of it. In fact, the very last part of the book talks about this and the very last paragraph in the book, hopes for and perhaps predicts a land sufficiently large and I think 300 over 300 electoral votes is sufficiently large three zero nine, I think it'll end up large margin that the election will be impregnable. That doesn't mean we won't have turbulence and disinformation and litigation, we will. But I think that we're going to be just fine. And I think our, you know, I really believe that. And I say this in a nonpartisan way that there's a hunger for the country to get back to normal. And I think we're going to see some remarkable, remarkable achievements and of course, wonderful news about a vaccine today. So
Saved - November 11, 2025 at 4:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I connected posts claiming Soros-aligned groups (Open Society, Neo Philanthropy, State Infrastructure Fund, Democracy Fund) coordinated a large 2020 election effort— Partnership for Safe Voting, Transition Integrity Project, and related funding networks—raising over $500M, deploying tools and audits, and aligning multiple organizations (Brennan Center, Protect Democracy, DFN) to “protect voting” and influence outcomes.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🔥🔥🔥Breaking new 2020 election scandal! Soros ran a $500 million organized plan called “Partnership for Safe Voting”, to ADMINISTER the 2020 election to benefit Democrats! This included utilizing the Brennan Center to litigate. We are talking drop boxes, ballot deadlines, fighting fraud allegations, ballot curing, etc… And the Brennan Center was even involved in audits! They did this as a member of the Soros Neo Philanthropies State infrastructure funds, Voting Rights Working Group. Laleh Ispahani as Co-Director of Open Society-U.S. created the “Partnership for Safe Voting”. This ran under Neo Philanthropies State Infrastructure Fund plus other orgs. She was promoted to executive director of OSF after this. “Last year, she ( Laleh Ispahani ) created and co-chaired the Partnership for Safe Voting, a large philanthropic partnership to protect voting in the face of the pandemic, voter suppression, and disinformation which raised over $500 million for front-line organizations.” Joe Goldman, President of the Omidyar Democracy Fund, and a member org of Soros Democracy Alliance also co-chaired the Partnership For Safe Voting. “Our grantees provided crucial technical assistance and education to local election administrators adopting mail-in voting, implemented health protocols at polling centers, and recruited thousands of much-needed poll workers.” Multiple pieces of software created to protect the 2020 election were created by the Trump resistance. The same people that colluded under Soros master plan. Protect Democracy ran the Transition Integrity Project that was mentioned in the Times fortification article. They ran both Voteshield and Ballotshield in 2020. Lisa Monaco was involved in Voteshield too! Rabed-v and the misinformation reporting portal were funded by the Joe Goldmans Democracy fund. Joe Goldman, the co-chair of the Partnership For Safe Voting, admitted that they were partisan hacks even tho running 501 c3 charities to do this! All of this election collusion stuff they did was to benefit the Democrats! “we are anchored in our values, not this sense that the ultimate goal is actually some kind of bipartisan stance.” “And worries about entire sets of nonprofits having their 501c3 status revoked, which I'm sure you'll remember there was a period in April where everybody said that's coming and then it didn't come.” “They can come after my 501c3 status. They can target my staff or myself. But I am far more protected than those on the front line.” (Protected? How?) Obviously they got more money than they intended. Here’s the Democracy Funders Network (DFN) call for funding. DFN is ran by Rachel Pritzker and Mike Berkowicz. DFN also put a call in for funding the TRANSITION INTEGRITY PROJECT ran by Protect Democracy and mentioned in The Times election fortification article: (And trust me, there’s going to be more later on DFN .) “Attend this funder briefing with Joe Goldman of the Democracy Fund, Laleh Ispahani of the Open Society Foundation, and Scott Moyer of the Langeloth Foundation to learn about the Partnership for Safe Voting 2020, an ambitious initiative being launched by several philanthropic partners in an effort to raise and align $168 million in c3 and c4 resources to ensure the elections are safe, accessible, and secure.” According to Mike Berkowicz, who was co-founder of DFN with Rachel Pritzker, the 2020 election was all about philanthropy: Mike Berkowitz: philanthropy wound up having to play a role in election administration itself for the first time in history Robert Wiblin: Just to be clear, you’re saying philanthropists were funding the operation of the election, like the existence of polling places and things. I saw that and I couldn’t believe it. Mike Berkowitz: For instance, there was an actually not great Time magazine piece by Molly Ball on this a few weeks ago that talked about it in really conspiratorial terms. Sourcing will take many hours, enjoy!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🙀This webpage was deleted right after I accessed it! Was it this or is it something else being hidden? “Laleh Ispahani serves as Co-Director of Open Society Foundation for the U.S. (OSUS), the US component of the largest foundation dedicated to advancing justice, democratic governance, and human rights in the United States and globally. Laleh is an expert on protecting and expanding the right to vote, reducing the influence of money on politics, and ensuring that the internet remains an open and secure platform for free expression and civic participation. Last year, she created and co-chaired the Partnership for Safe Voting, a large philanthropic partnership to protect voting in the face of the pandemic, voter suppression, and disinformation which raised over $500 million for front-line organizations.” (All of my links are double archived so holler if you ever need a spare.) https://web.archive.org/web/20211207221630/https://rockwoodleadership.org/announcing-the-2021-22-national-leading-from-the-inside-out-yearlong-fellows/

Announcing The 2021-22 National Leading From The Inside Out Yearlong Fellows – Rockwood Leadership Institute web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Joe Goldman, is president of Omidyar Democracy Fund. Democracy Fund is a Soros Democracy Alliance member org. Joe Goldman was a Co-chair of Soros, Partnership For Safe Voting. In 2024, Joe was named “Foundation Leader of the Year” by Inside Philanthropy for his leadership of a campaign to support earlier nonpartisan election-year giving, called “All by April”. Joe has played a key role in creating and leading several bodies aimed at strengthening and growing the field, including chairing the Trusted Elections Fund and co-chairing the Partnership for Safe Voting. https://web.archive.org/web/20251005232546/https://givingdoneright.org/season-5-episode6/

Season 5, Episode 6 - Giving Done Right Podcast web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🚨🚨Soros commandeered our 2020 election! 🚨🚨 You will darn near 💩 yourself now that you know this Brennan Center stuff was directed by Soros! Read what all they did!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🔥 Thread 🧵 In my opinion, the Brennan Center did an exemplary job in fortifying the 2020 election. With generous help from Soros Open Society, Ford Fndn, Omidyar Democracy Fund (Partnered with Arabella/Soros Democracy Alliance), Rockefeller, Tides, Soros Fund Charitable Fndn and many thousands of other orgs! The Brennan Ctr estimated it would cost at least ➡️ $4 BILLION ⬅️ to “protect” all elections including primaries throughout 2020. Here’s what the Brennan Ctr proudly accomplished: ♦️ Constant communication with a coast-to-coast network of hundreds of election officials. ♦️ Pushed, “Covid-19 Should be a Legitimate ‘Excuse’ to Vote by Mail”. ♦️Pushed the purchasing and deployment of centralized vote tabulation machines (high-speed scanners). ♦️ Suggested localities deploy drop boxes to reduce their postage cost and increase security. ♦️ Partnered with the National Association of Secretaries of State. ♦️ Prioritized protecting the election by countering disinformation, misinformation, and attempts at further suppressing the vote under the pretext of a pandemic. ♦️ Provided solutions such as where to locate polling sites and how to configure and supply them. ♦️ Released tool kits for activists in all 50 states. In each tool kit, they identified the voting reforms needed in each state. ♦️Worked with local groups in Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Texas on state specific voter education and protection efforts. ♦️Worked alongside the Center for Tech and Civic Life and National Vote at Home, etc. (Zuckerbucks) ♦️ Conducted high-level media briefings and partnered with ABC. ♦️ Traveled to Georgia to help election officials conduct a recount of the presidential vote. ♦️ Helped to develop and implement Pennsylvania risk limiting audits. ♦️ Their attorneys filed or intervened in lawsuits in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Texas. To quote the Brennan Center on the 2020 election: “We are pleased to share with you this report on the truly extraordinary year that was. As we reflect on the Brennan Center’s accomplishments in 2020, we can say with great pride and relief that in the end, democracy prevailed against brazen assaults on our electoral processes, against lies intended to equate ballot access with stolen elections, and against naked attempts to delegitimize the votes and voices of Black and brown people.” Thread will include all evidence. Plus I will expand on CTCL with past threads. And who knows, there could be more.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Here’s Soros Open Society mentioning Laleh Ispahani’s promotion after creating the successful Partnership for Safe Voting for the 2020 election. Open Society Names Laleh Ispahani as Co-Director of Open Society-U.S. “Last year, in the face of the pandemic, voter suppression, and disinformation, Ispahani created and co-chaired the Partnership for Safe Voting, the largest philanthropic partnership in American history to protect voting rights. The Partnership’s efforts helped to ensure safe, secure, and fair elections in the U.S. in 2020 despite the enormous challenges.” Everything is coming with the sources and then some! https://web.archive.org/web/20211215185717/https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/newsroom/open-society-names-laleh-ispahani-as-co-director-of-open-society-u-s

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

This Democracy Funders Network, call for funding of the Partnership For Safe Voting, mentioned three people. Was Scott Moyer a third co-chair for the Partnership For Safe Voting? Because the other two certainly are. 🤷‍♀️ “COVID-19 has taken the urgency of efforts to protect our elections to a whole new level. Wisconsin and Georgia illustrated the chaos that can ensue for an election amid a pandemic. States and localities are sprinting to implement new voting procedures and rules, and the Iowa caucus debacle reminded us that accelerated implementations of changes can be risky. The necessary but dangerous rush towards implementation of safe voting comes against a backdrop of massive budget shortfalls for states and municipalities, as well as ongoing threats of disinformation threats and voter suppression. Attend this funder briefing with Joe Goldman of the Democracy Fund, Laleh Ispahani of the Open Society Foundations, and Scott Moyer of the Langeloth Foundation to learn about the Partnership for Safe Voting 2020, an ambitious initiative being launched by several philanthropic partners in an effort to raise and align $168 million in c3 and c4 resources to ensure the elections are safe, accessible, and secure. What are the objectives of the Partnership? How can it advance quick and strategic change at scale? How can you get involved? “ https://web.archive.org/web/20251003020719/https://www.democracyfundersnetwork.org/events/2020/6/2/funder-briefing-partnership-for-safe-voting-2020

Funder Briefing: Partnership for Safe Voting 2020 — Democracy Funders Network COVID-19 has taken the urgency of efforts to protect our elections to a whole new level. Wisconsin and Georgia illustrated the chaos that can ensue for an election amid a pandemic. States and localities are sprinting to implement new voting procedures and rules, and the Iowa caucus debacle reminded us that accelerated implementations of changes can be risky. The necessary but dangerous rush towards implementation of safe voting comes against a backdrop of massive budget shortfalls for states and municipalities, as well as ongoing threats of disinformation threats and voter suppression. Attend this funder briefing with Joe Goldman of the Democracy Fund, Laleh Ispahani of the Open Society Foundations, and Scott Moyer of the Langeloth Foundation to learn about the Partnership for Safe Voting 2020, an ambitious initiative being launched by several philanthropic partners in an effort to raise and align $168 million in c3 and c4 resources to ensure the elections are safe, accessible, and secure. What are the objectives of the Partnership? How can it advance quick and strategic change at scale? How can you get involved? REGISTER HERE> web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

‼️Here’s Democracy Funder Networks (DFN) call for funding the Transition Integrity Project and the Fight Back Table both mentioned in the Times Fortifying the election article. As I have already proven, Protect Democracy ran the Transition Integrity Project. I’ll show this at the end. Another note, the Brennan Center ran a similar project in 2024. I’ll also show this at the end. Plus more. “Tuesday, August 25 from 12-1pm ET / 9-10am PT Join DFN donors to discuss the potential and importance of planning for various election-related crises, and to highlight specific actions donors can take to prevent and/or respond to crises. We'll be hearing from Zoe Hudson of the Transition Integrity Project, Angela Peoples of Fight Back Table, Peter Colavito of Social & Economic Justice Leaders Project, and Jenny Flanagan of the Trusted Elections Fund on their efforts to identify, prepare for, and respond to threats to the integrity of the election results or potential abuse of power during a transition.” https://web.archive.org/web/20231228045641/https://www.democracyfundersnetwork.org/events/2020/8/25/planning-for-and-responding-to-election-crises

Planning for and Responding to Election Crises — Democracy Funders Network Tuesday, August 25 from 12-1pm ET / 9-10am PT Join DFN donors to discuss the potential and importance of planning for various election-related crises, and to highlight specific actions donors can take to prevent and/or respond to crises. We'll be hearing from Zoe Hudson of the Transition Integrity Project, Angela Peoples of Fight Back Table, Peter Colavito of Social & Economic Justice Leaders Project, and Jenny Flanagan of the Trusted Elections Fund on their efforts to identify, prepare for, and respond to threats to the integrity of the election results or potential abuse of power during a transition. In the last third of the call, donors with capacity for non-501(c)(3) giving will have the opportunity to stay on to discuss 501(c)(4) aspects of the work to coordinate post-election mobilization and response. REGISTER HERE> web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Soros Democracy Alliance, Neo Philanthropies - State Infrastructure Fund, is one of the orgs that ran the Partnership For Safe Elections. The State Infrastructure Fund has a multi state alliance each with multiple orgs. ♦️“The State Infrastructure Fund (SIF), established in 2010, is a project of NEO Philanthropy.” “SIF is a member of the Partnership for Safe Voting 2020 (PSV). PSV is a collaboration of pooled funds intended to scale needed community resources and reduce inefficiencies and duplication across existing democracy funds and strategies.” https://web.archive.org/web/20210624131441/https://www.macfound.org/grantee/neo-philanthropy-39197/ I also found this same evidence in a tax form for Freedom Together Fndn aka the JPB Fndn. Donation to Neo Philanthropy: TO SUPPORT ELECTION PROTECTION AND PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE VOTING VIA THE STATE INFRASTRUCTURE FUND https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/900747216/202123159349101517/full

NEO Philanthropy - MacArthur Foundation The MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. In addition to selecting the MacArthur Fellows, we work to defend human rights, advance global conservation and security, make cities better places, and understand how technology is affecting children and society. web.archive.org
Freedom Together Foundation, Full Filing - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica Since 2013, the IRS has released data culled from millions of nonprofit tax filings. Use this database to find organizations and see details like their executive compensation, revenue and expenses, as well as download tax filings going back as far as 2001. projects.propublica.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

NEO Philanthropies of Soros Partnership For Safe Voting; ♦️ Claims that they won the 2020 election using five states! (Wouldn’t be a bad idea for our DOJ to review those five.) ♦️Claims to be progressive vs bipartisan. ♦️Mentioned juggling a ton of 501 (c3) money into a 501 (c4) to get over tax hurdles. ♦️Used over 42,000 attorneys. ♦️Plus more - please read the thread

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

💥Breaking Thred! NEO Philanthropy, a little known Soros partnered org that prioritizes BIPOC, claims their use of minorities had a major role in determining election results in 5 states! Can you guess the 5? They also claim to be bipartisan and get tax free status. But they have talked about progressive and anti Trump causes a good bit. 🟣 “In November 2020, 159 million people turned out to vote—turnout not seen in more than a century.” “Central to this transformation is NEO Philanthropy’s State Infrastructure Fund (SIF).” They also have 42,000 legal volunteers. 🟣 The bio of the Head of their State Infrastructure Fund: “Erica assumes leadership of SIF after a period of dramatic achievement.” “In the 2020 election period alone, SIF, a non-partisan 501(c)(3) collaborative fund, awarded $56 million to 140 orgs in 17 states.” “African Americans eligible to vote in a presidential election hit a record 30 million, playing a major role in determining election results in AZ, GA, MI, PA and WI.” 🟣 In the Fall 2016 Soros Democracy Alliance doc, The Neo Philanthropy State Infrastructure fund was listed to receive checks for the “Committee On States” an Aligned Partner Organizations (APO) of Soros Democracy Alliance. Recall I found that Soros was a co-founder of Democracy Alliance. 🟣The State Infrastructure Project falls under Donor Services. In my referenced article, it worked in eight states across the country. (This number changes yearly.) “NEO’s Donor Service program meets a growing demand within the philanthropic sector for social justice groups to unify and collaborate with mission-aligned partners in order to empower movements and generate 🔸PROGRESSIVE🔸social change in our communities.” I’ll show tons more evidence in a later post that they support progressive policies. 🟣The groups supported by the State Infrastructure Fund are 501(c)(3) nonprofits and cannot make direct political expenditures. “But some of them, including Black Voters Matter, which was co-founded by activist LaTosha Brown, and the New Georgia Project, are associated with 501(c)(4) organizations, which can participate in politics, subject to limitations.” “Pro Georgia, is the nonprofit that manages grant money from the State Infrastructure Fund.” Pro Georgia is a member of the State Voices Network. State Voices is a Soros Democracy Alliance Aligned Partner as listed in 2016 doc mentioned above. (See photo) The grantee list (Who gets money from them.) for the Neo Philanthropy State Infrastructure Fund is massive! (See doc) Here’s a few notables: ♦️American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) - recall they worked on elections in at least Georgia. ♦️Brennan Center for Justice - Involved in election changes, Zuckerbucks, and audits etc. ♦️ Common Cause - Involved with DHS for election censorship etc. Listed in the same doc are the donors. Here’s some highlights: ♦️Carnegie Corp of New York ♦️Democracy Fund ♦️Ford Fndn ♦️Open Society Fndn Fndn ♦️Unbound Philanthropy ♦️Wellspring Philanthropic Fund 🟣 STATE VOICES SOROS DEMOCRACY ALLIANCE “A core part of SIF’s early grant-making, and one that continues was to support “state Tables.” These orgs, many of which are associated with a national umbrella org State Voices, coordinate the activities of civic engagement groups in a state so they are strategically aligned, and their collective plans are designed to have the greatest impact.” “SIF collaboratives prioritize BIPOC” and uses “a racial equity/justice lens”. Extra 🟣2018 Neo Philanthropy announced 3 new partner donor services: 🔹Democracy alliance polled fund 🔹NEW AMERICAN MAJORITY FUND 🔹Virginia plus 🟣 The Four Freedoms Fund is a project of NEO Philanthropy. Recall earlier discussions on this, CCDH, Unbound Philanthropy, & Narrative Change use. 🟣 The ADL works with the Thought Partnerships Hub thru the Bridging Divides Initiative. Thought Partnerships is ran by Neo Philanthropy. *All referenced links will be in a later post.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@Woodshed2012 Oh don’t worry about them, I have them covered, IN THE FUTURE. 😈

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@white_winf29065 The Times article project was repeated in 2024 by the involved Brennan Center.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@RickTrussell3 Actually yes it is.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@wildbill_70 Oh, I dug thru the web like a banshee. I’d like to know more about the third person at the DFN Funder call tho.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@CatZimmerer @Smith_mountian Ohh this just the beginning things are gonna get worse.

View Full Interactive Feed