reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - October 17, 2023 at 6:53 PM

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

KEEPING IT SIMPLE: If there are no physical locations available to the public = there is no way to get your money out in a time of economic crisis (Soon) Creditors do not care about your problems — only their bottom line. The central banks going insolvent won’t either.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

List of bank branches that will close this fall: Wells Fargo, Santander, BoA "Many national bank chains are closing down branches across the country as consumer habits shift to banking online." Don't let them fool you. They're at the end of their rope! https://en.as.com/latest_news/list-of-banks-that-will-close-this-fall-wells-fargo-santander-bank-of-america-n-3/

List of bank branches that will close this fall: Wells Fargo, Santander, Bank of America… Many national bank chains are closing down branches across the country as consumer habits shift more and more to banking online. en.as.com
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 9:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Banks facing issues are those not Basel 3 compliant. Some ignored my advice to check their bank's status. Now, they can't access funds. Prideful ones wait for me to be wrong. Salute to those who did their research.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The only banks having this issue are those financial institutions that are not Basel 3 Compliant. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/article-12707935/bank-direct-deposit-issues.html

Bank of America, Chase and Wells Fargo hit with deposit delays America's major banks have been hit by deposit delays following a glitch at a payment processing network - leaving customers unable to get paid. dailymail.co.uk

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

You have people on here that really think I be playing with them. I have been saying for months to check if your bank is Basel 3. Now look what is happening. They can no access their funds. Why? Because they refused to do what I asked. They are just waiting for me to be wrong about something. To prideful. Salute to everyone that did their research.

Saved - November 4, 2023 at 10:11 AM

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Tomorrow I will list some nefarious reasons why banks avoid Basel 3 Compliance. Hint- Higher Intrest & Lower Cost (For Them)

Saved - November 6, 2023 at 4:37 PM

@SantaSurfing - Santa Surfing

Citizen Bank Collapsed! 🔥🔥 Let’s goooo!!! 🔥🔥 @amc4everyone @BossBlunts1 https://www.fdic.gov/resources/resolutions/bank-failures/failed-bank-list/citizensbank.html

FDIC: Failed Bank Information for Citizens Bank, Sac City, IA FDIC: Failed Bank Information for Citizens Bank, Sac City, IA fdic.gov
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 12:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Basel 3 is a set of international banking regulations aimed at improving financial stability. Banks may avoid implementing Basel 3 to increase short-term profits or to avoid the cost and complexity of compliance. However, non-compliant banks risk losing FDIC coverage, which protects depositors in case of bank failure. The Dodd Frank Act allows banks to use customer deposits as collateral, but this can be risky for depositors. Banks may also try to avoid regulatory scrutiny by using various tactics. It's important for individuals to inquire about a bank's Basel 3 compliance to protect their money. The manipulation of the gold market helps maintain confidence in fiat currency. Understanding the importance of Basel 3 and the gold standard is crucial for financial stability.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Basel vs Banks: The Line In The Sand What is the basis of Base 3? To instill monetary discipline. To invoke checks & Balances. Supervision with ample reserves in banks. New funding requirements will inadvertently cause banks maintain certain profit margins accounted for through what is in their reserves as opposed to figures on a computer screen where they get to lend out money they have and not what they can inflate at their volition like they did with the Sub-Prime Mortgage Crisis in 2007-2010. The subprime mortgage crisis of 2007-10 stemmed from an earlier expansion of mortgage credit, including to borrowers who previously would have had difficulty getting mortgages, which both contributed to and was facilitated by rapidly rising home prices. Historically, potential homebuyers found it difficult to obtain mortgages if they had below average credit histories, provided small down payments or sought high-payment loans. Unless protected by government insurance, lenders often denied such mortgage requests. While some high-risk families could obtain small-sized mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), others, facing limited credit options, rented. In that era, homeownership fluctuated around 65%, mortgage foreclosure rates were low, and home construction and house prices mainly reflected swings in mortgage interest rates and income. So why would banks avoid implementing Basel 3? To Increase Profits: Basel 3 requires banks to hold more capital, which can reduce their profits. Some banks may be willing to risk their solvency in order to increase their profits in the short term. Which goes back to the monetary prudence required in order to become compliant. They will not be able to lend at artifical rates that eat away at home values for the clients seeking out loans or mortgage they can not afford. Which would take away the incentive for banks to lend out to the benefit of them but to the detriment of the customers. Which is why the banks implemented the fail-safe policy "The Dodd Frank Act". Many do not know what this is. This was created for banks to continue lending out money they do not actually have by using customer deposits as collateral just in case another housing crisis arrived they could legally confiscate deposits without telling the client to save their own arse. Why do you think banks are now having to close their doors while customers bang on it outside complaining as to why they can not access their money? Why do you think banks act as if they have no idea what Basel 3 is even though most of the banks that have FDIC were all given memos ahead of time as to what Basel 3 is and why they need to meet these new policies by preparing their institutions by a certain date? To Avoid Regulatory Scrutiny: Basel 3 is a complex set of regulations, and complying with them can be costly and time-consuming. Some banks may be willing to take the risk of being fined or sanctioned by regulators in order to avoid the hassle and expense of compliance. Regulatory scrutiny is the oversight of banks and other financial institutions by government agencies. The goal of regulatory scrutiny is to ensure that banks are operating safely and soundly and that they are complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Banks avoid regulatory scrutiny for a number of reasons. Some of the most common reasons include. • Cost: Regulatory compliance can be costly for banks. They need to hire staff to manage their compliance programs and they need to invest in systems and technology to help them comply with regulations. • Complexity: The regulatory landscape is complex and ever-changing. Banks need to have a deep understanding of all applicable laws and regulations in order to avoid scrutiny. • Reputation: Banks do not want to be seen as being non-compliant with regulations. This could damage their reputation and make it more difficult to attract customers and investors. • Fear of Punishment: Banks that are found to be non-compliant with regulations can face a variety of punishments, including fines, penalties, and even criminal charges. This is the reason they are not willing to disclose that they are not Basel 3 for clients who may be well versed as to the negative status banks are currently in who did not employ this new banking rule. People will realize their money is not safe in those banks. Then they will potentially pull their money out. And as they do not those banks who have the Dodd Frank Act in place will not be able to rely on customer deposits to offset the financial loss if another housing crisis was to happen. Guess what? Our political leaders in Washington DC like Maxine Waters knew exactly what these banks were doing. Why do you think her district was in such squalor? In some cases, banks may avoid regulatory scrutiny because they are engaged in risky or illegal activities. For example, a bank might try to avoid scrutiny if it is lending money to borrowers with poor credit or if it is investing in risky assets. It is important to note that not all regulatory scrutiny is bad. In fact, regulatory scrutiny can help to protect consumers and investors. However, banks do have a legitimate interest in avoiding unnecessary regulatory scrutiny. Here are some ways banks do this. Which is a fraction of the many loop holes they exploit. • Structuring Transactions: Banks can structure transactions in a way that makes them appear less suspicious to regulators. Example, a bank might break up a large transaction into multiple smaller transactions in order to avoid reporting requirements. • Using Shell Companies: Banks can use shell companies to hide their ownership of assets or their involvement in transactions. This can make it more difficult for regulators to track their activities. • Operating in Offshore jurisdictions: Banks can operate in offshore jurisdictions that have lax financial regulations. This can make it more difficult for regulators to oversee their activities. Do you all see how these banks operate solely to benefit themselves? Do you see why so many banks are closing their branches? Do you see why people get the thousand yard stare when they ask if banks are Basel 3? Do you now see why it is important to inquire about this rule to protect your own money? This is why the US Central Banks were assisting in suppressing the gold prices. This way they can keep confidence in the fiat dollar high. Which ofcourse helps them to maintain the ponzi scheme. The gold market is manipulated (held down) through the use of paper gold trading (naked shorts). Why do they do this? Because you can not print gold. Banks can not create gold. Banks can not confiscate gold. Think about it. When we are officially under the gold standard. The Federal Reserve is prevented from creating money out of thin air. Meaning if they are sitting on 500 million in gold reserves. They would only be able to print 500 million dollars. Not 600, 700, or 800. Why? Because they would have to account for where the extra 300 million came from. Understand? This is why paper money was created. People not wanting to walk around with gold bars were able to use paper for everyday purchases to lighten the load physical gold created. It acted as a constituent. Not as a replacement for gold or silver.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Banks lose FDIC coverage if they are not Basel 3 compliant because Basel 3 is a set of international banking regulations that are designed to improve the financial stability of the banking system. FDIC insurance is designed to protect depositors from losses if a bank fails. However, the FDIC does not have the resources to insure depositors at banks that are not Basel 3 compliant. So everyone who think this is their saving grace against bank failure need to think this through. If the banks lose their insurance due to non compliance what makes you think you will not lose yours if it is in an institution that is in the negative? Especially when these are banks that are under the Dodd Frank Act that make it legal for banks to take your money just in case they fail.

Saved - November 10, 2023 at 3:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Banks rush to comply with Basel 3 & ISO-20022 by Nov 20, coinciding with the government shutdown. JP Morgan's influence pushes the deadline to Nov 17, as they account for 50% of ISO traffic. "Nov 2023 is the target," says JP Morgan.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Banks that are Basel 3 & ISO-20022 Compliant are all racing to go live with the new rules prior to November 20th. Which is parallel to the government shutdown. A coincidence? 😎

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

You all have to understand JP Morgan accounts for 50% of the ISO traffic. This means they are dragging the rest of the banks to this deadline of November 17th. https://x.com/Rohitku24694375/status/1697555006571139232?s=20

@Rohitku24694375 - ISO 20022.... LET'S DO IT

💥JP MORGAN: “NOVEMBER 2023 IS THE DATE THAT EVERYONE IS MARCHING TOWARDS” 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯💥 https://t.co/IISO16FH4a

Video Transcript AI Summary
The ISO 2022 priority is being given a lot of attention and is considered highly important. The November 2023 deadline seems to be the main focus for everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: ISO 2022 priority. So no one has said not all that important, so that's good. Certainly, lots of folks are focusing on this. It looks like it's of high importance, across. I know, the November 2023 date is is what everyone has been marching to you. So that's good. It looks like it's been very high on the priority list.
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 2:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
After a 40+ year banking relationship, a large national bank unexpectedly terminated my family's 7 accounts, including our kids' college debit accounts. The reason? We attempted to wire funds to a bitcoin-only company. Despite explaining that bitcoin is not crypto, the bank cited the risk associated with cryptocurrency. Now, we have to wait for checks to be mailed in 2 weeks to access our money. This experience has made me proud to be unbanked, and I will reveal the bank's name soon. It seems we have entered the phase where they fight against us.

@BitcoinGustavo - Bitcoin Gus ⚡️

Today I was unbanked without notice by a large national bank after a 40+ year banking relationship that started way back when I was a freshman in college. My family’s 7 accounts including kids’ college debit accounts, cards they use daily are terminated. Why? Attempting to wire funds to a #bitcoin only company. They said the risk to the bank is too great to have customers exposed to #crypto. I tried to explain #bitcoin is not #crypto as if that was going to matter. The only way I can get my money is to wait for checks to be mailed in 2 weeks or so. #unbanked November 17, 2023! My badge of honor. Once I get the money, I will reveal the bank 🏦 name! We are just entering the now they fight you phase!!

Saved - November 28, 2023 at 9:39 AM

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Basel 3? ❌ ISO-20022? ❌ Dodd Frank Act? ✅ As stated multiple times I told you all this would happen. Banks are closing down so why not go out with a bang by confiscating customer deposits for your own personal business? What can they do when it's legal? https://t.co/2spNFOj9Lm

Saved - December 16, 2023 at 3:24 AM

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

A. Mortgage Backed Securities❓️ B. Trillions In Derivatives❓️ C. Non-Compliance To Basel 3❓️ D. Low Capitol Reserve❓️ E. No More Reverse Repos❓️ All of the above❓️

@TheInsiderPaper - Insider Paper

ALERT - UK's Metro Bank is down leaving thousands of customers without access to their accounts – online services and mobile app not working - reports https://t.co/BgxknQgsvv

Saved - December 22, 2023 at 12:05 PM

@WeAreWoke1776_3 - We Have It All

Banking fookery. Learn. https://t.co/oIyOJRkAQq

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1969, Jerome Daley challenged the foreclosure of his home by the bank, arguing that the mortgage contract required both parties to provide legitimate property for the exchange. He claimed that the money the bank provided was created out of nothing. The bank's president admitted in court that they created money and credit through bookkeeping entries, but there was no law giving them the right to do so. The jury found no lawful consideration, and the court rejected the bank's claim for foreclosure. This court decision has significant implications, suggesting that borrowed money from banks is counterfeit and voids the contract to repay. Unfortunately, these legal realizations are suppressed, allowing perpetual wealth transfer and debt to continue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1969, there was a Minnesota court case involving a man named Jerome Daley who was challenging the foreclosure of his home by the bank which provided the loan to purchase it. His argument was that the mortgage contract required both parties, being he and the bank, each put up a legitimate form of property for the exchange. In legal language, this is called consideration. Mr. Daley explained that the money was in fact not the property of the bank, link, for it was created out of nothing as soon as the loan agreement was signed. Remember what modern money mechanics stated about loans? What they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits. Reserves are unchanged by the loan transactions, but deposit credits constitute new additions to the total deposits of the banking system. In other words, the money doesn't come out of their existing lessons. The bank is simply inventing it, putting up nothing of its own except for a theoretical liability on lever. As the court case progressed, the bank's president, mister Morgan, took the stand. And in the judge's personal memorandum, he recalled that the plaintiff, bank's president, admitted that in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank, did create the money and credit upon its books by bookkeeping entry. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it? Mister Morgan admitted that no United States law or statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the known. The jury found that there was no lawful consideration, and I agree. He also poetically added, only God can create something of value out of nothing. And upon this revelation, the court rejected the bank's claim for foreclosure and Daly kept his home. The implications of this court decision are immense. For every time you borrow money from a bank, whether it is a mortgage loan or a credit card charge, the money given to you is not only counterfeit, It is an illegitimate form of consideration and hence voids the contract to repay, for the bank never had the money as property to begin with. Unfortunately, such legal realizations are suppressed and ignored, and the game of perpetual wealth transfer and perpetual debt continues.
Saved - January 5, 2024 at 9:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: The warnings were clear: it's not ISO-20022 compliant, created by the government, and used for human trafficking. Goodbye to that. Post 2: Today, we gather here.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

🪫In The Red: Off To Greener Pastures- Well you all know what this means. Kiss it goodbye. 😚 👋 😢 -We told you it was not ISO-20022 Compliant. -We told you it was created by the government. -We told you it was used for human trafficking. We told you everything.

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NOW - Jim Cramer says "you can't kill" Bitcoin: "It's here to stay." https://t.co/iIY9rqDve5

Video Transcript AI Summary
There will not be an ETF, but those who are interested in it will use this opportunity to sell. It cannot be killed, even though Charlie Munger was blind to its potential. Some may argue that it will eventually fail, but it is a reality and a technological marvel. People need to accept that it is here to stay, despite the SEC's opposition. This unexpected comeback proves the bulls right. Genstler has done a lot of work on it, but it didn't succeed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. There won't be an ETF, but I do think that the people who are in it for that are gonna use that as a chance to sell. This thing is you can't kill it. Oh. And the late Charlie Munger, who was so, brilliant on so many things, was blind to this. Now you could say, wait a second. Maybe it's all gonna come on route. Has, has not spared any, negative words. No. But, look, I mean, it's a reality, and it's a technological marble. And I think people have to start recognizing that it's here to stay. The SEC's been against it almost all the time. Yeah. Now that doesn't mean that every one of these is here stay, but I do think that it's about this is a remarkable comeback that was unexpected, except for for all the bulls who appear out to be right. Genstler does a lot of job on it. Didn't work.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Dearly Beloved... We stand here today. https://t.co/uKanKtQ6d6

Saved - March 11, 2024 at 3:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The shift towards online banking is causing the decline of brick and mortar banks. These institutions lack the capital to meet consumer demands and are burdened by physical reserves. Additionally, the derivative market and bank runs are contributing to the closure of many banks. This is a crucial time for the financial sector.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The Death of Brick & Mortar Banks A paradigm shift is not an event its a process. Everything will eventually be online for the sake of convenience and profit. Why continue lending to institutions that people are using less and less? Nor to mention they do not have the capital to meet consumers demands. Especially when they actually have to have physical reserves and not just numbers on the computer to lend out loans to customers that can't afford the intrest and end up owing on their mortgage. Then if the banks have too many foreclosures on their books they end up shutting down as well. The derivative market is another layer to this that is aiding in all of these bank closures that is forecasted to be 1,300 by the end of the year. Not to mention the bank runs alone will cause most of these institutions to fold under after March 11th. So there is a plethora of reasons why we are where we are at this crucial time in the financial sector. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/article-13160397/bank-closure-wells-fargo-bank-america-pnc.html

US bank closures hit 222 in two months this year - is YOURS affected? In the first two months of the year American banks closed some 222 branches. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - April 10, 2024 at 11:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Australia's banks are refusing cash withdrawals, leaving customers frustrated and confused. Many are questioning the purpose of a bank without access to their own money. The situation has left people feeling helpless and disappointed with the lack of assistance from the banks.

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

Australia's Banks Are Already Refusing Cash Withdrawals For Their Customers: "I thought it was absolutely crazy" "How can you go to a bank and not get your own money out?" "I thought she misheard what I wanted" "What's in the bank if there's no cash?" "They just said" "I'm so sorry we can't help you" 🚨🚨🚨

Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman in Queensland was shocked when she went to her bank to withdraw cash but was told they didn't have any. Taryn Compton forgot her EFTPOS card and asked for cash at the ANZ ATM, only to be informed that the bank no longer carries cash. Taryn found it absurd and was told by the bank that they don't have cash anymore, leaving her puzzled about what's in the bank if not cash. She was not given any explanation or assurance that the situation was temporary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, outrage in Queensland tonight after a local woman rocked up to her bank to withdraw cash only only to be told they didn't have any. Taryn Compton wanted to grab some notes to pay a tradie, but when she got to the ANZ ATM, she realized she'd forgotten her EFTPOS card when she asked the teller for the money instead. She was told the bank doesn't carry cash. Speaker 1: And Taryn Compton's here to tell us all about her terrible banking experience. Taryn, what did you think when you walked into a bank only to be told they don't have cash? I thought it was absolutely crazy. I thought she must have misheard what I wanted, if I'm honest. How can you go to a bank and not be able to get your own money out? Karen, that's what I'm confused about. So what's in the bank if there's no cash? Isn't there like in the if you open up the safe, what's in there? What did how did they explain it to you? They just said, I'm so sorry. We can't help you. There's nothing Speaker 2: we can do. We don't have cash here. So did you think maybe that was a temporary situation? That maybe they were gonna get some cash tomorrow? Speaker 1: No. She actually said, we don't carry cash anymore.
Saved - April 13, 2024 at 11:17 PM

@media_laina - Laina Media

CASHLESS BANKING IS HERE.... This is no longer a talking point. It's here. WATCH! https://t.co/z0CujvK0wj

Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman in Queensland was shocked when she went to her bank to withdraw cash but was told they didn't have any. Taryn Compton needed money to pay a tradie, but the ANZ ATM didn't have her EFTPOS card. When she asked the teller for cash, she was told the bank no longer carries cash. Taryn found it crazy and was confused about what the bank had if there was no cash available. The bank explained they don't carry cash anymore, leaving Taryn without her money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, outrage in Queensland tonight after a local woman rocked up to her bank to withdraw cash only only to be told they didn't have any. Taryn Compton wanted to grab some notes to pay a tradie, but when she got to the ANZ ATM, she realized she'd forgotten her EFTPOS card when she asked the teller for the money instead. She was told the bank doesn't carry cash. Speaker 1: And Taryn Compton's here to tell us all about her terrible banking experience. Taryn, what did you think when you walked into a bank only to be told they don't have cash? I thought it was absolutely crazy. I thought she must have misheard what I wanted, if I'm honest. How can you go to a bank and not be able to get your own money out? Karen, that's what I'm confused about. So what's in the bank if there's no cash? Isn't there like in the if you open up the safe, what's in there? What did how did they explain it to you? They just said, I'm so sorry. We can't help you. There's nothing Speaker 2: we can do. We don't have cash here. So did you think maybe that was a temporary situation? That maybe they were gonna get some cash tomorrow? Speaker 1: No. She actually said, we don't carry cash anymore.
Saved - May 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

BREAKING: Macquarie bank goes cashless this month Bloody conspiracy theorists right again ... 🚨🚨🚨 https://t.co/GD4Sxs83Gq

Saved - June 14, 2024 at 5:48 PM

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Swiss Flowbank just declared bankruptcy! Things are getting spicy in Switzerland. ht @runews

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

@runews source: https://www.flowbank.com/

FlowBank - Invest in global markets with a Swiss bank. FlowBank is a fully licensed Swiss bank under the regulation of the FINMA. Our trading platforms give you access to invest in global financial markets. flowbank.com
Saved - September 17, 2024 at 2:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just got debanked from my US bank right after Liberpulco, and Bank of America also debanked me personally. Anarchast, which accepts donations through @NotGovernor, faced the same fate last month. The debanking continues, but we have backup plans and crypto to stay secure.

@BerwickJeff - Jeff Berwick

Anarchapulco was just debanked from its US bank right after Liberpulco! And, a few days later, Bank of America debanked me personally! We always expect things like this and always have numerous backup plans (plus crypto!) so we are fine but the debanking continues!

@BerwickJeff - Jeff Berwick

Anarchast which accepts donation with @NotGovernor was also debanked last month! They are coming after us hard!

Saved - October 1, 2024 at 6:15 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Australia is going "Cashless". Without warning all 4 major banks started restricting cash withdrawals in various cities, making some branches "cashless". The administration took a billion dollars worth of bills out of circulation. Individuals cannot withdraw more than $500. It’s happening.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Australia is reportedly shifting towards becoming cash-free, with over $1 billion in notes disappearing from circulation in the last year. This follows the Commonwealth Bank's trial of cashless branches in Sydney. Economists claim a cashless society could negatively impact criminals in the black market. However, it could also make life harder for elderly people who depend on cash.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Australia is slowly shifting towards being cash free. More than a $1,000,000,000 worth of notes have disappeared from circulation in the past 12 months. It follows the Commonwealth Bank's decision to start trialing cashless branches across Sydney. Economists say a cashless society will hurt criminals on the black market, but will make life more difficult for the elderly who rely on notes and coins.
Saved - October 22, 2024 at 2:46 AM

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

Is $BAC Risk Management team rushing to their desks on a Sunday night already? https://t.co/7L997BQl0u

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

It’s being documented and tracked since 2022 👇🏻 #silver $BAC https://t.co/Qh0y4R0pot

Saved - October 30, 2024 at 3:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just got debanked again, with most of my accounts closed, including Bank of America last month. Mercury shut down both my personal and business accounts today. We're left with few options, likely to be shut down too. Thank God for crypto; it's our only lifeline now.

@BerwickJeff - Jeff Berwick

I just got debanked AGAIN. Most of my bank accounts all over the world have been closed including Bank of America last month. Today, Mercury shut both myself and our business (TDV) down. We still have a few options but they'll likely shut them down too. We'll soon be crypto only for pretty much everything we do. Thank God for crypto or we'd be screwed! You can't talk about the J's and say they control everything or they'll shut you out of everything because they control everything.

Saved - January 14, 2025 at 11:15 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“Banks are stopping withdrawals of your money” Have you tried to withdraw over £1,000 in cash recently - you literally are required to go through an interrogation process to access you own cash. https://t.co/gC72PMcKp8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Banks are increasingly restricting withdrawals and deposits. A friend attempted to withdraw $20 but was told he needed to explain its purpose. When he went to withdraw $20,000, the bank required proof of where the money was going. Additionally, attempts to invest in Bitcoin were limited to just $5 a month. This reflects a broader trend towards a cashless society, which could lead to increased control over personal finances. It's essential to diversify your funds across multiple banks, as relying on bank insurance can be risky. Political views can also affect banking access, as seen with Nigel Farage's experience of being debanked. Ultimately, it's crucial to take control of your finances and decentralize your money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Banks are stopping withdrawals of your money. Two stories about this, the same bank. One of the most famous banks in the UK. You'll know it. My friend, Pete, called up the bank and asked for $20. They said, what's it for? He said, none of your business because it's my money. They said, we can't do that. You're gonna have to come into the branch. He went into the branch the next day expecting to be able to withdraw his money. $20, not a 100 grand. And he asked the person at the bank, I wanna withdraw 20 grand of my money. They said, what's it for? He said, none of your business. It's my money. They said, well, unless you can tell us exactly what the money is for and exactly where the money is going with proof, you can't have your money. Now, you should be shocked about that by the way. Just give me a yes in the comments if you can hear me. You should be absolutely shocked by that. Couple of you are saying no sound. Just give me a yes in the comments if you can hear this. So with the very same bank, I wanted to put some money into Bitcoin when, you know, Bitcoin had dropped and it was $25 I think. It wasn't massive but, you know, it was a bit and, they would allow me to put $5 max a month into Bitcoin in 1.5 grand a day maximums. And I read the terms and conditions of the bank and they basically said, we don't allow money into cryptocurrency platforms. You should be shocked by these two stories. Now, do not be naive about this. I've posted this on X and on LinkedIn. Make sure you're following me there. My post are going viral there. And people are really naive. They say, oh, you know, with the banks, it's anti money laundering. That's just normal. It's for your safety. Well, yeah. Okay. It's good to have some checks. I get it for, you know, you don't want to fall to a scam. However, let's not be naive that that's the real reason they won't let us put cash in or take cash out. You can hardly put any cash in the bank now. You can hardly take much out and they look like they're moving us towards a cashless society. Cashless society means tracking, tracing, controlling, taxing at source, finding at source, stopping your account, de banking you, controlling you, whacking up the transaction fees. All of these things will be a reality or could be in a cashless society. Some of you are asking me to name the bank. They're one of the big four banks in the UK. So NatWest. I'm just gonna tell you. It was NatWest. And so, here's the thing. The banks can take your money, lend it, invest it, earn on it, pay you hardly any back. And then, when you want it, they make it really hard for you to get it or you can't get it and you can't put it into cryptos. And then, they say it's all to protect you. Anti money laundering and and scams. And it's not there's not a fair balance. This is not right, and you have to be aware of this. Now a few tips here then for you. Number 1 is don't put all your money in one bank. Spread it around as many banks as possible. People say to me, oh, Robert, it's alright because the bank insures my money. Well, have you tested that insurance policy? Have you ever tried to, claim for insurance on a car or a watch? How easy is that for you? So a lady in a Toyota backed into my Aston Martin DBS. I went to claim on her insurance. It put my premium up, my business partner's premiums up. We've got about 15 cars in in our fleet. They all went up. My wife's car went up. And in the end, I had to cancel the claim because it put the insurance up on my and other related cars when it was her fault when she crashed into me. I don't know if you saw my friend Nigel Farage. He got de banked and then all of his friend well, not all of his friends, but many of his family, they got de banked as well and he couldn't open a bank account. He tried with 9 different banks. He couldn't open it up because of his views on social media. So with your views on social media and your political leanings, you can get debanked. Do you really entrust these the insurance policies because they stop claims on cars and watches, etcetera? They're limiting to virtually nothing the money you can put in crypto. And unless you tell them exactly what you're doing with the money and where it's going, you can't get much out and you can't hardly put any money in, and that's the reality. So you need to be prepared. Decentralize your money. Have it under your control.
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 8:54 PM

@badazn - 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐮𝐫 𝐊𝐰𝐨𝐧 𝐋𝐞𝐞

“Just start your own bank” Word. https://t.co/fJk6WzEckO

Saved - November 2, 2025 at 10:12 AM

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

I see why they filed for bankruptcy... https://t.co/KYf1u5vqve

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 launches a heated confrontation, telling Speaker 1 to “go suck another dirty dick” and insisting, “I’m not the one or the two.” They call Speaker 1 a “raggedy ass fucking bitch” and declare, “I’m not the one or the two.” Speaker 1 asks, “What you talking about?” and appears confused or surprised, while Speaker 0 repeats the insult, telling Speaker 1 to “Go suck a dick.” Speaker 0 asserts, “I said what I said, and I said what I said,” and adds, “Please text me like you want it.” They emphasize the challenge to Speaker 1, saying, “You tried me two times,” and conclude with, “I want you to do it a third.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go suck another dirty dick. Don't play with me. I'm not play with you. Do not play with me because I'm not the one or the two. One or the You're not the one or the two. Speaker 1: You know what, honey? Speaker 0: Let's go. You ain't got sister. No. Ain't gonna do nothing. Name. I You and your raggedy ass fucking bitch. Speaker 1: What you talking Speaker 0: about? Fuck out of here. Go suck a Speaker 1: dick. Like Speaker 0: I said, I said what I said, and I said what I said. Please text me like you want it. Go suck another dirty dick. I'm not the one of the two, bitch. You tried me two times. I want you to do it a third.
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 5:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with how banks in America are handling business accounts. A business owner I know is livid after being told she couldn't close her account without first dissolving her business and providing proof. It’s absurd—she’s the owner and the only one authorized to sign. This experience feels worse than being interrogated just to withdraw money. The situation is becoming ridiculous.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Banks in America are out of control ‌ Business owner is “livid” ‌ She went to close her business account, the bank refused. She was told in order to close her account “I had to dissolve my business and show them proof of that before they would close out my business account” ‌ “Excuse me? I came to you to open my business account. I’m the owner, I’m the only one who signs on everything. Why can't I close my business account?” ‌ This feels even worse than being interrogated every time you try and withdrawal money out of your account. This is getting ridiculous…

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm a little annoyed. I went to the bank to close my business account, and they told me I had to dissolve my business and prove it before they'd let me close the account. I opened the account with them in the first place. I'm the owner, and I'm the only authorized signer. Why can't I just close the account? There's no one above me. What if I just don't want to do business with them anymore? I'm not dissolving my whole business just to switch banks. That's ridiculous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So little livid, somebody explained to me why when I went to the bank to close out my business account, the little guy told me that I had to dissolve my business and show them proof of that before they would close out my business account. Excuse me? I came to you to open my business account. I'm the owner. I'm the only one that signs on everything. Why can't I close my business account? There's nobody above me. There's nobody else that takes care of it. What if I decided that I didn't want to do business with you? I'm not gonna close my business just so I can go to another bank. Woah. I'm fuck him.
Saved - December 31, 2025 at 7:17 PM

@NoToDigitalID - No to Digital ID

In the UK you can’t even withdraw cash from your own bank account unless they agree with the usage… See what I/we have to live with? The world is laughing. https://t.co/jigXusswtD

View Full Interactive Feed