TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - October 25, 2023 at 6:01 AM

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

PFIZER LIED TO YOU: 17,000 Scientists and Physicians confirm that Pfizer, Governments, Corporations and the Media deliberately lied to humanity about the Covid vaccines. They must be charged with fraud, wrongful advertising and mass negligent homicide. https://t.co/IT7VYssYJW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the genetic COVID-19 injections are more harmful than beneficial, especially for young and healthy individuals. They argue that the vaccines do not reduce COVID-19 infection and can actually increase the risk of infection, disease, and death compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker also mentions potential damage to the heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, and immune system. Another speaker questions the testing of the Pfizer COVID vaccine and demands data from the committee. The response states that the vaccine was not tested for stopping transmission before entering the market. There are also concerns raised about the vaccines causing harm to women of reproductive age and unborn babies. The transcript ends with accusations of fraud and calls for criminal charges against vaccine manufacturers and government entities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We must acknowledge that the genetic COVID nineteen genetic injections cause far more harm than good and provide zero benefit relative to risk for the young and healthy. They do not reduce COVID nineteen infection, which is treatable and not terminal. Furthermore, the most recent data demonstrates that you are more likely to become infected or have disease or even death if you've been vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated people. This is shocking to hear, but it is what the data are showing us. The data now show that these experimental gene therapy treatments can damage your children as well as yourself. It can damage your heart, your brain, your reproductive tissue, and your lungs. This can include permanent damage and disablement of your immune system. Speaker 1: Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine Tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. If not, please Clearly, if yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want straight answer, yes or no, and I'm looking forward to it. Speaker 2: Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanization before, it's entered the market? No. These, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk. Speaker 3: I really do believe that the federal government is captured As captured by corporate interests, the entire US population as well as the world has to understand they can no longer take these COVID vaccines. These are, they are toxic and lethal to an end ineffective that they have completely failed. They can only be viewed It is harmful and they need to Speaker 4: be stopped. And does it damage the brain? You bet it does. Is it damage to the heart? Yes. The liver? Yes. The bone marrow? Yes. It causes all sorts The harm in the human body. We should have stopped this before it ever started. Speaker 5: It's a misinformation from the CDC, the FDA, the American Board of The American college of a GYN, the society of the Patients, it is causing a lot of death and injury in my women of reproductive age, my pregnant women, and my pre Born babies and it's gotta stop and it's gotta stop now. Speaker 4: And for the vaccines broadly, we have no idea Yeah. What's gonna happen long term now that they're in the body? Studies suggest that the vaccines and the spike protein that's produced from them never Speaker 5: The the first and most important thing, don't take any more vaccines. Don't take any more boosters. Do not take any More of these dangerous experimental therapies. Speaker 6: Dear colleagues And supporters, we declare that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen and AstraZeneca And their enablers willfully withheld and admitted crucial safety and effectiveness information From patients and physicians and should be immediately indicted for fraud. We know that shortly after administration of these products, Thousands of people have died. And although correlation isn't causation, reasonable criteria have been applied To examine the relationship between injections and the events and is absolutely clear cut that these are the cause of death. Mechanistically, the design of these products was knowingly deficient in a number of ways. First, They caused the expression in the human body of toxic virus spike protein. Unlike what They told us that it would stay in the injection site. They distribute widely around the body. There was no built in limit to the amount of toxic spike Protein that can be made or for how long it is made. That's the cause of the toxicity. Turning to the clinical trials, there There is evidence of questionable practices all around. For example, several of the studies were clearly unblinded while they were ongoing Contrary to best practice and also in a number of cases, subjects were removed from the database prior to statistical analysis In a way that is suggestive of fraud. We were given blanket assurances time and again by all of the companies about benign safety profile of their products. Even as the products rolled out in the earliest weeks, they must have known this Was not true. To add insult to injury, it appears that these products provide little Well, no protection from the virus that they sought to protect us from. Speaker 7: Two questions get asked when people have hesitancy or reluctance to get vaccinated. Did you go too quickly is the first. The answer to that is the speed was a reflection of extraordinary scientific Advances and did not compromise safety nor did it compromise scientific integrity. The next Question is, okay, but what about the fact, is it really safe and is it really effective? Or is this Something the government is trying to put over on us. Is this something the companies want to take advantage of? Well, Well, let's take a look at what's happened over the past few months. Speaker 4: I'm going to be very clear about this and I've recently just testified in the US Senate December 7, 2022. The vaccine is killing people and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality For, a medicinal product causing death, our CDC as of December 23, 2022 has over 1000 Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine. Yeah. And that's probably a gross under report. Speaker 8: We don't know if these vaccines will work. We don't know if they'll work to avoid deaths. We don't know if they'll work to avoid transmission. That's why we're working on so many 1st generation vaccines. Speaker 2: How do we know if these vaccines are working? Speaker 8: You'd like it to be very safe In all the populations, that you indicated for no side effects and then you'd like it to avoid the individuals who gets the vaccine getting sick. Speaker 4: So where are the criminal charges going to, first come? I think the easy ones to go after are illegal advertising. The vaccines have been advertised by the CDC, The NIH, FDA, DHS, and the vaccine companies as safe and effective. Americans know they can't do that. The vaccines have to be presented with risks and benefits Including fatal myocarditis, blood clots, and neurologic damage. We haven't seen that on TV. That violates the Lanvin Act, the Truth in Advertising Act, US Drug and Cosmetic That that is an easy conviction for wrongful advertising of all those entities. That means government entities being called For malfeasance or wrongdoing. And then beyond that, the big charges are fraud. America has been defrauded in so many aspects of pandemic response.
Saved - October 28, 2023 at 8:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2018, a NICU nurse raised concerns about administering Hep B vaccines to newborns. The nurse revealed that parents were not properly informed and often pressured to comply. The lack of a convincing explanation from pediatricians added to the confusion. Nurses, aware of the inconsistency, discreetly advised parents against the vaccine. This highlights the need for transparency and informed consent in medical procedures.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

A NICU Nurse Turns Vaccine Whistleblower. This is from 2018. It’s a short read. Please read and repost. You’ll save lives. https://paleofam.com/2018/08/a-nicu-nurse-turns-vaccine-whistleblower/

A NICU Nurse Turns Vaccine Whistleblower - Paleo Family I am a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurse. For almost 14 years I worked in some of the best children’s hospitals in the country. I have never really been one to question “modern medicine” until somewhat recently. When you work in healthcare, you mostly just assume that everything is… Continue reading paleofam.com

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

From a nurse friend of mine: I can attest to this NICU nurse. I NEVER consented parents when I gave them the Hep B vaccine or Vit K on the first day of life. On the contrary if they refused I would have to make them sign a consent that they were going against the recommendations. But as labor and delivery nurses we questioned why it was necessary a one day old baby needed the hep b vaccines. No pediatrician could give us a good answer. So my best way of consenting parents without getting in trouble was to have the parents ask all the labor and delivery nurses if we gave our children the hep B vaccine when making their choice. And the answer was always NO. We knew it wasn't right because it didn't make sense if parents were Hep B negative. I would ask the question if they were concerned about their newborn babies going out and having unprotected sex and the answer was no. It never made sense to us nurses. We were just being forced to do what was protocol.

Saved - November 11, 2023 at 11:03 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Orange County 15-month-old dies 2 days after 'well-visit' vaccinations. One of the rare times, when the media doesn’t suppress a story like this https://bronx.news12.com/orange-county-15-month-old-dies-2-days-after-well-visit-vaccinations

Orange County 15-month-old dies 2 days after 'well-visit' vaccinations Hospital records obtained by News 12 show the baby suffered liver and kidney failure, as well as cardiac arrest.  bronx.news12.com
Saved - April 7, 2024 at 11:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A psychiatrist's personal research on vaccines follows the tragic death of a baby. The Covid vaccine scam prompts many to question the risk-benefit analysis of vaccines. Pfizer's history of corruption, including a record-breaking fine in 2009, raises concerns about their motives in the healthcare industry. The concept of "a patient cured is a customer lost" is worth considering.

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨💉 Psychiatrist does her own research on Vaccines after baby tragically dies from vaccine. The Covid Vaccine scam has made millions question & look into the risk benefit analysis of vaccines in general. Remember Pfizer is one of the most corrupt companies on the planet - in 2009 they were fined $2.3BILLION - the largest corporate fine in history. It’s a big business for them working on the concept of:- ‘A patient cured is a customer lost’ Think about it…..

Video Transcript AI Summary
After my daughter's death, I delved into vaccine research. Shockingly, since the smallpox vaccine, vaccines have been linked to brain inflammation and chronic autoimmune issues. Placebos in trials can be harmful substances like aluminum or mercury. The science is available, but many choose to ignore it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I never learned in medical school how vaccines were studied, what type of clinical trials they went through, how they evaluated adverse reactions, how they even evaluated effectiveness. So after Victoria died, I started reading everything that is put out there. Anything that would lead me to a topic, then I would Google that topic. And if there were textbooks in relation to that topic, I would order them. And then based on reading that book, I would order another book. What I have learned has shocked me. There has been information out there since the smallpox vaccine was created, linking vaccinations to encephalitis, which is inflammation of the brain, which can cause death or permanent neurological disability. I've learned recently the placebo in a vaccine trial can actually be the aluminum or the mercury or another vaccine. I would assume the placebo was normal saline, which would be like water, something not harmful. In accredited peer reviewed medical literature, They have linked vaccinations to chronic autoimmune problems. The science is out there. People are just choosing not to look at it.
Saved - April 25, 2024 at 3:11 AM

@MimiinNZ - Mimi in NZ

ACC vaccine injury payouts, New Zealand. https://t.co/o3PqCvNyhZ

Saved - May 19, 2024 at 10:45 AM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

The Financial Incentive to Vaccinate American Children. Dr. Paul Thomas explains how pediatricians are basically forced to over vaccinate children, despite the data which does not support doing so. 🔊 https://t.co/hbdeQQFbHJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Paul Thomas discusses how pediatricians are financially incentivized to fully vaccinate patients, with penalties for non-compliance. He explains the economic impact of refusing vaccines in his practice and the pressure to adhere to the CDC schedule. Thomas highlights the financial benefits tied to vaccination rates and the concerning correlation between vaccines and infant mortality. This information challenges the conventional narrative on vaccine safety and efficacy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In an April 16th interview with Polytomi, doctor Paul Thomas explained how the American Medical Establishment incentivizes pediatricians to fully vaccinate their young patients and finds them if they don't, vaccinations that have been proven to cause more death and harm than the diseases they are said to be preventing. Speaker 1: Well, as other practices started kicking people out of their practices if they weren't following the CDC schedule, I was getting more and more families who didn't wanna do any vaccines, which was fine with me. So we took an entire month of every single billing sheet. And on every visit, on the back of that, our providers would mark off what vaccines we recommend according to the CDC schedule, families could decline them, and then our billing department, insurance company by insurance company, vaccine by vaccine, we looked at how much money was being lost for vaccines that were refused, just the admin fee. So there's 3 main ways you make money off of vaccines in pediatrics. Number 1 is the admin fee. And you get about it depends on the insurance company. Every contract's different. But I would average it out to say about $40 for the first antigen and $20 for each subsequent antigen. So let's just say a 2 month well baby visit. There's a DPT. That's 3 shots, 3 antigens. HIB, Pravnar, d hep b, Polio, Rotavirus, 6 shots, 8 antigens, about $240. Thank you for giving those shots. Multiply that by the fact that I was getting 30 to 40 newborns per month. They're coming in repeatedly at 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15, 18 months, and age 2. So we looked at the admin fee loss and from my practice that was billing at that time about 3,000,000 gross, we were losing $1,000,000 over $1,000,000 in vaccines that were refused. So you cannot stay in business if you're not giving pretty close to the CDC schedule. It just doesn't pencil out economically at all. Let me tell you about the other two ways we make money from vaccines. One is the markup that's that's small. They don't allow a lot of profit on vaccines as far as markups, but they do this thing called incentives or bonuses, and it's called a quality bonus. Well, in pediatrics, one of the main quality measures is how well you vaccinate. Isn't that interesting? It has nothing to do with how healthy your kids are. Like, when I studied my vaxxed versus unvaxxed patients, the unvaxxed were so incredibly healthy. They rarely got sick. They rarely would end up in an emergency room or in a hospital or with any chronic condition. So being unvaxxed results in very healthy kids who don't use a lot of medical dollars. Every health system should want that, but it's reversed. It's all flipped. It's bizarre. You're supposed to have had your kids up to date about 80% of them by age 2. Guess what percentage of my population was at fully vaccinated at age 2? 1%. The goal is 80%. So Doctor. Paul gets an F minus. Basically what that means is, not only do I not get paid the normal amount for everything else we do in the office, I get dinged maybe 10 or 15% off of those RVUs, relative value units that are ascribed. Everything you do in medicine is given a value. If you do very well on your quality measures, vaccinator, you may get an additional 10% on everything you do in your office. That's huge. SIDS is Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. When you hear the word syndrome, it means we don't know what it is. We don't know what causes it. SIDS when that infant died relative to when they got a vaccine. In one dataset, 97% were in the first 10 days after the vaccine. For the 6 other studies, a couple of them showed that 50% of the deaths happened in the 1st week, but 75 to about 90% of those deaths are happening in the 1st week after vaccines in all these studies. We've known this for decades. The countries that have the most infant vaccines have the highest infant mortality. Guess where the U. S. Stands? We are number 1 in infant vaccines. We are number 1 in industrial countries for infant mortality. There's a document 450 page legal document that has tables showing for every single disease for which we have a vaccine, there are more deaths from the vaccine than there are from the disease for which we have that vaccine. Speaker 0: Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
Saved - May 21, 2024 at 6:20 AM

@VictorFromDE - Victor Scott

Nurse believes that all of the autistic kids she has worked with (over 80) had their autism caused by vaccines. https://t.co/GdUONkjNzq

Video Transcript AI Summary
My name is Silvana Casale, a school neuropsychologist with over 25 years of experience working with over 70 autistic kids. I have noticed a connection between the MMR vaccine and immediate changes in behavior in children. The reaction is often immediate, with some children experiencing a transition overnight. I believe that all 80 kids I have worked with may have been affected by vaccines causing autism. The toxicity of multiple shots given together can be intense, leading to drastic changes in behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Give give me your name. Speaker 1: My name is Silvana Casale. I'm a school neuropsychologist. Speaker 0: And, how long have you been working with autistic kids for? Speaker 1: Over 25 years. Speaker 0: How and and about how many autistic kids have you worked with? Speaker 1: Over 70, over 80. Speaker 0: Yes. Okay. And and during that time, have you ever noticed any connection between the receipt of a vaccine and autistic behavior beginning? Speaker 1: Yes. Definitely. And usually, the MMR and the parents see an immediate change in the child. Speaker 0: So right after the MMR shot Speaker 1: Absolutely. And do Speaker 0: they see it after any other shot? Do they see it after a flu shot? Speaker 1: I haven't heard of that, but it's possible that that's the tipping point for some children. Speaker 0: And so the but the reaction is immediate. It's not like 6 months later. It is night and day right after the shot. Speaker 1: Immediate. Your experience. Yes. And parents have video of the child speaking before and then they lose their language. Speaker 0: Now does that happen in a 100% of the cases, 50% of the cases? No. Speaker 1: It does not happen. A lot of Speaker 0: kids If it happens, does it always happen immediately? If it happens, is the transition Speaker 1: My opinion is yes. Some parents may say it was gradual over a month or 2 months, but that might be because they weren't too Paying attention. Paying attention as much as possible. But the other problem is that the shots are given in conjunction with each other. You go to your well visit, and the pediatricians will give a child 5 or 6 at once. And the toxicity of that is quite intense. Speaker 0: Take them over. But the point is that when they succumb to autistic behavior, that change happens almost immediately. Could it what's the fastest it's ever happened? Like Speaker 1: I think for some families, it's happened overnight, the next day. The next day. The child has a fever many times. They're screaming in pain, and they become nonverbal. They don't respond to their parents. They no longer maintain eye contact. Speaker 0: And and so what percentage of these 80 kids over the 30 years you've been doing this, what percentage of those 80 kids would be connected to a vaccine cause autopsy or cause autism? Sorry. Speaker 1: I think it's probably all of them. I would say a 100%. Speaker 0: Okay. Thank you. Speaker 1: Yes. Thank you.
Saved - June 11, 2024 at 5:01 AM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Breaking: Federal Court Rules Covid Shots Are Not Vaccines, Big Pharma Liable For Fraud https://t.co/SBpG95qTOP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses various topics related to vaccines, COVID-19, and misinformation. They mention that the Centers for Infectious Disease changed the definition of vaccines on their website, causing the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal to rule that COVID mRNA jabs are not vaccines. The speaker also claims that insurance company numbers show over 30 million deaths from the shots. They criticize the use of PCR tests and highlight a case where a motorcycle crash victim was counted as a COVID death. The speaker questions why Dr. Fauci is not being sued or held accountable. They also mention an offer made to control Alex Jones' company and what they could say. The speaker promotes a sponsor and urges support for Infowars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Centers For Infectious Disease subgroup that Fauci was running changed on their website the definition to anything we put in your body that changes your body. You you look it up. So now the 9th circuit hearing all this said, no. You you don't basically have immunity. That's why this was being done. It's going forward. You can't just change definition yourself and then say whatever you give somebody, a gene therapy. Last week, Bill Gates says, we're gonna give all the cow shots where they never produce methane again, and it mutates their guts. What how the hell do you give something a shot that mutates their intestines when they never produce methane again? When that's how a cow breaks down cellulose, you breaks down grass into something you can process. It it it's it's it's it's they're mutating your body while you're alive, folks. That's called cancer. Speaker 1: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visit infowars.comforward/show and share the link today. Speaker 0: So what broke in the last, week? British Medical Journal, hundreds of other scientist groups. Okay. It's true. The insurance company numbers are accurate. I've been I've been reporting this number for a year because I was going off old actuaries. It there always takes them a year to put out the latest year. So by 2021, 2022, given poison shots, it was over 20,000,000 debt. 22,000,000 is a high number. 18,000,000 was the low number. Put it on the insurance company actuary. These are some of the best numbers out there because they need to know, you know, who to give insurance to and how much money to charge. The new numbers, and I have here in the stack, are 30 +1000000 dead, and that's 2023 because we just got last week from insurance companies all over the world and governments the death numbers. I got a clip talking about it. We'll get to here in a moment. It's a 35,000,000 dead from the shots. They're, like, why for a year is between 2,000,000 and now it's 35,000,000? It's getting worse even though the shots have gone down. 4% are taking them, not this year, but worldwide. Same number everywhere. People seem to be the same whether in Germany or the US. And it's not just a Dutch scientist says at least 35,000,000 deaths have been caused by COVID. When you link through the articles, that's the new numbers that came out a week and a half ago. But here's the big enchilada on this baby. Breaking COVID mRNA jabs are not vaccines. 9th Circuit Court of Appeal rules. And what did they say? It's a big article. Jamie White, infowars.com. I posted on x with the court ruling. His article and the court ruling from x. I mean, the court ruling on X. In 1986, Ronald Reagan, who I think was a good guy overall, but on his watch passed the vaccine act to supposedly give money to people that were damaged. But what it really did was give immunity to the so called vaccine makers. But the definition back then was take a virus or or or some other pathogens, some other creature, and create an attenuated version of it so that your body knows how to beat it and recognizes it's outside. It's a real science. It works pretty good sometimes, but it gets contaminants. It causes other side effects, but it it's real. The problem is what do they jack into as a Trojan horse, or what do they put in it on accident? S v 40 cancer virus, as they said, was an accident, but they keep acne with the COVID shot. It's not an accident. Number one cause of cancer is s v 40. Look it up. Simeon virus 40. So a year before in 2019, the CDC and the Centers For Infectious Disease subgroup that Fauci was running changed on their website the definition to anything we put in your body that changes your body. You you look it up. That's not a legal deposition. It wasn't passed by Congress. So now the 9th Circuit hearing all this said, no. You you don't basically have immunity. That's why this was being done. It's going forward. You can't just change definition yourself and then say whatever you give somebody, a gene therapy. Last week, Bill Gates says, we're gonna give all the cow shots where they never produce methane again, and it mutates their guts. How the hell do you give something a shot that mutates their intestines where they never produce methane again when that's how a cow breaks down cellulose, breaks down grass into something it can process? It it it's it's it's it's it's they're mutating your body while you're alive folks. That's called cancer. So this is a big article. Big story. We put it on screen. Great job crew for from X. So I just didn't know what I was gonna go to next. I already have it up. So, again, it's all a lie from the first letter of it. So they're admitting the shot doesn't work. They're admitting it destroys your immune system. They're admitting it's killed tens of millions of people. And now they're saying lawsuits should go forward because you don't have immunity. The law says it's for vaccines. For smallpox or chickenpox or measles or hepatitis or the flu. This isn't that. You can't you can't come and change the name outside of law and then bomb people with this. Well, the CRO, 8 days ago, 9 days ago, couldn't just not a court order, shut this place down, but they tried. I'd tell the security people that came here to do it. There's no law. Show me court order. Of course, we're still here. But it's only because we knew what we're doing and and and spoke up. And the security guys are the right people. They were just being put in this position. I hired them many years ago. Good private company. But but that's the kind of stuff that goes on. So I know you said as a microcosm about me because imagine all the other crap going on with a big scale to you with this. I mean, take the military. Yeah. You join the military, an approved vaccine, they can make you take it. They can't make anybody else take it under the law, but you can make the military that's in the contract you sign. But under law, there's been a anthrax shots, a bunch of cases of this in the last 40 years. Swine flu, you name it, shots. You can't make them take an unapproved experimental shot. Now that's all come out in court and confirmed. But they purged the military with it and injured and killed a bunch of other people. They got a 900% increase in heart failure in the Navy's service people. So we're a 1,000 in the general military. Think of the numbers I'm giving you. So the 9th Circuit says, this is not a vaccine. Boom. Boom. Boom. Boom. I'm fined a 1,000,000,000 and a half dollars with no jury trial, found guilty in a jury trial how guilty I was, how much I owed, for saying things I never said, 1,000,000,000 and a half dollars. Gets up and says, masks don't work. Now they work. No. They don't work. 100% they don't work. Oh, the vaccine's a 100% effective. No. It's not effective. We'll get to this after the guest comes on last 30 minutes. But but it it's it's just absolutely insane. So so let's look at some of these other articles. Mexico says bird flu patient died of chronic disease, not virus. I went and read that the patient was on desk doorstep. The global medical group comes in, sticks a PCR test on him that was that they turned up on high where a tomato would say it had bird flu and said, oh, he died of bird flu. So him into his dead body and said that, I told you that over a week ago. Here it is, Yahoo News, AP Reuters, Mexican government press release. He did not die of bird flu. They say he probably didn't even have bird flu. It's a PCR test. Amyl Influenza, Mexico. Disease outbreak news. World Health Organization. A man in Mexico died with one form of bird flu, but US officials remain focused on another. So here's the hill still reporting the horse crap even as the Mexican government says he died of other complications, and he was dead when they tested. So that's the level of horse crap you're being fed just like somebody would die in a motorcycle accident or an 18 wheeler accident or farming accident or be shot. Because I would read the death certificate. So I remember 3 years ago, they'd say, oh my god. This guy died. You know? When you we go look at the death certificates later, it'd be like, died of the motorcycle, died of the shooting, died of suicide, died of cancer, died of a brain tumor, died of a of of heart attack. But they counted him. Remember, they also said there was no flu in 2020, because they need to count every dead person that died as from COVID to create the fear. Once the shots began, then the real death began. Yeah. There it is. Man who died motorcycle crash, counted as COVID death in Florida. So let's move on now. Got a special guest coming up. This great air force colonel, Ann Marmolis 30 minutes. And and then I'm gonna hit this story that that I mentioned. It'll take about 10 minutes on all the other stuff because I got a lot here. But but this is really a big deal. Overhead shot, please. MTG and basically, so many others, I couldn't even keep track of it. I mean, it was like 2,000,000 retweets, you know, 1,000,000 retweet. It was, like, like tens of millions of people a day without even looking. Like, MTG, the great MTG were saying, well, wait. If Alex Jones was fined $1,500,000,000 in a show trial for things he never said, why is it Fauci being sued? Why is it Fauci in jail? Why is it Fauci for creating gain of function by law that's been put in prison? MTG, if Alex Jones owes 1,500,000,000 for his information, how much does Fauci owe? Owe? Family's agreed to Alex Jones' bankruptcy liquidation. They'd already filed this, but the key is in this Reuters article and others I've got where they go. Look. We offer Jones, you know, 85, a $100,000,000 and we would control his company and run it and control what he said. He disagreed. That's an offer you can't accept. It's the opposite of the godfather, an offer you can't refuse. And I've told you that hundreds of times, and now they're in the news quoted by name saying, we wanted to run his company, run what he could say, have a board of directors in there, and sit there and hell would freeze over. So I even felt bad saying, okay. I'll raise money just to tell the truth and still give you most of it. But when I said, no, was when they said, we wanna control what you say. And I said, no. Hell no. Never. And I would never imagine when they said that in in these meetings with them, that we're supposedly, you know, off record. The judge says it's all off record. And I'm like, well, there's some really bad stuff off record being said, and then they would openly say it to my lawyers on record. Later, well, the Jones will just shove about this. We're gonna list things. We'll leave him alone. And then now they're in the newspaper admitting it. I mean, these people are are are something else. Need to support our sponsor, and that's drjonesnaturals.com. Drjonesnaturals.com. There's a paid sponsor for each week systems, all there, and is supporting this whole operation. Go there if you support what I'm doing and want to have us funded with whatever's coming in the future with a great sponsor. It was our current sponsor, drjonesknackles.com. Go there now, and your cash, your vote against tyranny, and probably your last chance to get great products to the rate is shipped to you at infowarsstore.com. Infowarsstore.com. So many great products. Ultimate fish oil. Gosh. Nitric boost. I mean, wow. So good for you. Get that now. But it takes funds to fight the new world order. It's like it takes funds for Trump to fight the new world order. Hour number 2, so much more coming up. Please stay with us. Speaker 1: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visitinfowars.comforward/showandsharethelinktoday. Speaker 0: Twelve products that have not been available for a long time are now exclusively available and back in stock at doctorjonesnaturals dotcom. Twelve products. My dad owns the company. He developed most of the supplements for Infowars. These are game changing. They're amazing. All of them are of the highest quality. The Nano Silver toothpaste and wound gel and immune gargle, Next Level Foundational Energy, Top Brain, Rocket Rest. The list goes on and on. But 12 products not available for months months months are now back in stock exclusively at doctorjonesdackles.com. And one of the big ones is Fiber Green Caps. These are the concentrated essence of a spectrum, like wheatgrass is in there as well, of known sprouts that just do incredible things for immune systems, our health, our energy, and for our guts. So it's back in stock. Green fiber capsules, unlimited run exclusively at doctorjonesdactyls.com. Check it out today, and I thank you for your support. And for breaking news and updates, be sure and follow me at real Alex Jones here on X.
Saved - June 20, 2024 at 3:54 AM

@VGircys - Vincent Gircys

31 out of 32 babies died. Pfizer knew, the Ottawa Police Service was informed by Detective Helen Grus and they did nothing about it. The product is still being recommended and injected. Start at the 37 min mark for details. https://t.co/gBeSmsR03Z https://t.co/OoZ88KRGQU

Saved - June 28, 2024 at 4:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Maddie de Garay case raises concerns about the Pfizer vaccine trial for 12-15 year-olds. The misreporting of her injury distorted the trial's outcome, leading to fraudulent contracts and the inclusion of COVID shots in the children's vaccine schedule. This inclusion provides Pfizer with liability shielding under the NCVIA. Thorough investigation is needed, but the complexity of the issue may hinder proper scrutiny. Kudos to @RepThomasMassie and @AaronSiriSG for bringing attention to this matter.

@alexandrosM - Alexandros Marinos 🏴‍☠️

The Maddie de Garay case is the one case that blows up the whole Pfizer vaccine story. They misreported her injury in the 12-15 year-old children's vaccine trial, because if it were reported, that would have represented a far worse outcome than the covid harms to those 1000 children, which were of course negligible, and therefore the benefits of the vaccine to those healthy children, which were of course negligible. This is true especially considering that most children were naturally immune by that point. Pfizer lied and that lie presented a completely distorted image of what the outcome of the trial was, leading to Pfizer fraudulently securing further contracts, as well as the eventual inclusion of the COVID shots in the children's vaccine schedule. That inclusion, in turn, due to the provides Pfizer with liability shielding due to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34). This law shields Pfizer of liability from that vaccine for injuries in *any patient*, so long as it is in the childhood schedule and it is also considered safe for pregnant women. If this isn't investigated thoroughly, nothing will ever be, but of course the story goes way too deep for it to ever be investigated properly. Once more, props to @RepThomasMassie and @AaronSiriSG for bringing this issue back to the surface.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚩 Aaron Siri Shares the Heartbreaking Story of a 12-Year-Old Girl Who Was Seriously Injured in the Pfizer Trial & How the FDA Looked the Other Way "The FDA did finally ask Pfizer about Maddie de Garay but it was only after somebody who's very, very wealthy emailed Janet Woodcock...Dr. Peter Marks just goes, oh Pfizer's paid principal investigator says he 'doesn't feel it's related'...No reprimand to Pfizer, takes no issue with them as far as I can tell." @AaronSiriSG @shdegaray73 @HighWireTalk @ICANdecide @RepThomasMassie

Video Transcript AI Summary
Maddy DeGary, a participant in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trial for 12 to 15-year-olds, suffered serious injuries post-vaccination. Pfizer initially downplayed her condition as abdominal pain, misleading the FDA. Despite being wealthy, only after an email to FDA officials did Pfizer admit to DeGary's injuries. FDA's response was lackluster, showing no concern for Pfizer's misconduct. The failure to report all adverse events corrupts the trial process, with no repercussions for Pfizer's actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Siri, can you tell us about Maddie DeGary? Was she was she a participant in one Speaker 1: of these trials, and how was her case reported? Maddie DeGary, who we represent her and her family, was one of only about 1100 children in the Pfizer 12 to 15 year old COVID-nineteen vaccine clinical trials. Pointed out earlier, you need to have a separate trial for children. When Pfizer reported after her second dose, she suffered a serious injury. She was in the emergency room. She had a cascading, adverse reaction. She went she ended up in a wheelchair with a feeding tube. And the fact that the vaccine caused an injury, it happened. It's tragic, but injuries from products happen. But here, what hap what's even what here the real, incredible part of this story is that when Pfizer reported her injury, they reported it as functional abdominal pain. We know that from a foyer production we had to fight to get. We then told the FDA in 4 separate letters, hey. Pfizer did not fully inform you about Maddie DeGary's injuries. She's in a wheelchair. She has a feeding tube. The only thing they told you is she has functional abdominal. She has a tummy ache. After 4 letters, over a 120 days later, they finally responded. And what did the FDA say? They told her to file a VAERS report. She was in the clinical trial of VAERS, which, by the way, she had already done months earlier. We then sued the FDA for all their communications regarding Matty D'Aurea in the Southern District of Ohio Federal Court. And when we finally got those documents, here's what we found. The FDA did finally ask Pfizer about Mady DeGary, but it was only after somebody who's very, very wealthy emailed Janet Woodcock about Maddy DeGary. She then asked doctor Peter Marks, and then Peter Marks asks that, you know, request be sent to Pfizer. Pfizer responds, and this is the first time as far as we are aware that Pfizer ever tells the FDA about Matty D'Ares' injuries. And when you read the narrative that was provided to the What what what was the response to the FDA or Peter Marks when Speaker 0: he found out that they had misled them? Speaker 1: He seemed unconcerned. And my understanding is he said, well, they reported she had a serious stomachache. So, you know, they reported that she had a serious injury. It was basically a whitewash. He he sat, as I ex I would expect, as a partner with Pfizer defending them for their misconduct. He should have been outraged. He should have said, why didn't you report this? Irrespective of whether you thought it was related, you had an obligation to tell us of all injuries. We decide later what to do with the data, but you got to report it. They didn't report it. I'm not aware of any penalty, any issue with Pfizer about it. And when you read the internal email chain, which is part, by the way, in our in the document we submitted, we have a link to all those emails. You can read them yourself. Pfizer's paid principal investigator says he doesn't, quote, feel, feel, that's what he writes, that the vaccine caused the issue. And it appears that Mark's just Speaker 0: Whether the vaccine caused the issue or not, can you throw somebody out of a trial and not repre not say what happened to them? And the Speaker 1: It corrupts the entire process. You you're the idea is is that you have a new product. You don't know what how it affects the human body. So you take in all harms that occur after vaccination. You report all of them. The causality assessment happens afterwards, potentially. But you bring them all in, and it should, as I pointed out earlier, be a statistical comparison. Here, basically, from what you look if you look at the email channel, it looks like Mark just goes, oh, Pfizer's paid principal investigator says he doesn't feel it's related. That's and that goes kind of in the chain of emails and looks like that's how it dies. No reprimand to Pfizer. It takes no issue with them as far as I can tell.
Saved - July 9, 2024 at 9:36 AM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

An Australian judge who dismissed a lawsuit against Pfizer, which alleged that the company knowingly violated laws regarding genetically modified organisms with its Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, failed to disclose that she had been on Pfizer’s legal payroll. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/australian-judge-who-dismissed-covid-vaccine-lawsuit-failed-to-disclose-she-was-on-pfizer-payroll/

Australian Judge Who Dismissed Covid Vaccine Lawsuit Concealed She Had Been Paid by Pfizer An Australian judge who dismissed a lawsuit against Pfizer failed to disclose that she had been on Pfizer's legal payroll. thepeoplesvoice.tv
Saved - August 4, 2024 at 2:18 PM

@CartlandDavid - (Honest/Ethical/Safe Dr) David Cartland

Hacking of EudraVigilance data reveals massive coverup of vaccine injuries in the Netherlands – The Expose https://expose-news.com/2024/07/30/hacking-of-eudravigilance-data-reveals/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2JMLuTk7b8GE-eD38777NGo17hpSu60rRKTNU4FMr59Pl61gPWW0wPGcM_aem_uuKlPMF7ATfJ840zHKoZww

Hacking of EudraVigilance data reveals massive coverup of vaccine injuries in the Netherlands The hacking of the European EudraVigilance data has revealed a massive coverup of vaccine injuries in the Netherlands and an explosion in excess deaths after covid “vaccines” were rolled out. Last year, a Dutch researcher was able to find a back door to the European drug surveillance and monitoring system, EudraVigilance, and download adverse event… expose-news.com
Saved - October 25, 2024 at 4:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts highlighting various significant stories that the media overlooked. I discussed alternative cancer treatments compiled by doctors defying the COVID narrative, Tucker Carlson's powerful predictions about the upcoming elections, and alarming expansions of military authority under the Biden-Harris administration. I also covered a controversial study on puberty blockers for kids that was withheld, the recent firing of BART workers over vaccine mandates, and Bill Gates facing trial in the Netherlands regarding COVID vaccine claims.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Doctors who defied the COVID narrative compile 18 alternative cancer treatments that WORK! These interventions are not only backed by science, but most of them are affordable or completely free. The first anti-cancer therapy is glucose management through a ketogenic diet. By drastically reducing carbohydrate intake, the ketogenic diet helps starve cancer cells of their primary fuel source, glucose, according to the FLCCC Alliance. Second on the list is exercise. The report says that regular physical activity boosts immune function (critical for fighting cancer), reduces inflammation, and combats fatigue. Vitamin D3 is also essential. The report says, “Low levels of vitamin D have been linked to an increased risk of cancer. Supplementing with vitamin D3 may support the immune system and help prevent cancer cell proliferation.” One of the more interesting items on the list is the inclusion of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. Ivermectin is believed to “interfere with cellular processes essential for cancer cell viability,” whereas Fenbendazole inhibits cancer cell division and induces cancer cell death. Here are all 18 therapies ranked in order, as compiled by @Honest_Medicine: 1. Glucose Management & Keto Diet 2. Exercise 3. Stress Reduction, Sleep, and Sunshine 4. Vitamin D3 5. Propranolol 6. Melatonin 7. Metformin 8. Curcumin (Nanocurcumin) 9. Ivermectin 10. Mebendazole/Fenbendazole/Albendazole 11. Green Tea 12. Omega-3 Fatty Acids 13. Berberine 14. Atorvastatin or Simvastatin 15. Sildenafil, Tadalafil, and Vardenafil 16. Disulfiram 17. Ashwagandha 18. Itraconazole Read the full details about each treatment in the article below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Alternative cancer treatments are being explored worldwide, with growing interest in therapies that complement or replace traditional methods. Dr. Paul Merrick's Cancer Care 2nd Edition challenges conventional paradigms and is available as a free download or for purchase, with proceeds supporting cancer research. Eighteen alternative treatments are listed, backed by over 1500 peer-reviewed references. These include glucose management via a ketogenic diet to limit fuel for tumors, and exercise to improve survival rates. Stress reduction, sleep, and sunshine are also mentioned, along with Vitamin D3 supplementation to support the immune system. Other treatments include Propranolol, explored for reducing stress-induced cancer progression; Melatonin, for its antioxidant properties; and Metformin, investigated for inhibiting cancer cell growth. The remaining treatments can be found at vigilantnews.com. The speaker then promotes a 3-month emergency food kit from My Patriot Supply, emphasizing the importance of preparedness in uncertain times. The kit includes various meals and has a 25-year shelf life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The last story is rather remarkable. Do you know about this? 18 alternative cancer treatments that actually work. Now contrary to common belief, alternative therapies and treatments are found in cancer research around the world. Check this out. Facing a cancer diagnosis can feel like navigating an endless maze with no clear direction. The overwhelming emotions and confusion that accompany such news are shared by many. While conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation therapy have a role to play, there's a growing interest in alternative therapies that can com complement or even replace traditional methods. Did you know that many alternative cancer treatments have been explored offering new hope to those affected by cancer? The use of complementary and alternative medicine is becoming more prevalent as patients seek options beyond conventional medical treatments. Alternative medicine includes therapies used outside of standard medical practices offering different approaches to treat cancer. Integrated medicine combines both conventional and alternative treatments aiming to improve outcomes and enhance quality of life. One shining example in this field is doctor Paul Merrick's Cancer Care 2nd Edition, a comprehensive guide that challenges conventional cancer treatment paradigms. This newly updated edition is available as a free download on our site, or you can purchase it on Amazon with all proceeds supporting our ongoing investigation to cancer research. By arming yourself with knowledge, you can take control of your cancer journey and explore options that may have been previously overlooked. Below, we've compiled a list of 18 alternative cancer treatments and interventions that offer hope and empower you to make informed decisions about your health. The science backed curation is based on more than 1500 peer reviewed references from the medical literate literature. Let's dive in. 18 complimentary alternatives and therapies to treat cancer. Let's talk about them. Glucose management and a keto diet, that's free sugar and, limiting the amount of sugar you bring into your body. That's self explanatory. You obviously wanna cut down fuel source for the tumors, allegedly. Now I don't know if that's even scientific, but that's what they're saying here. Exercise is self explanatory as well. We know moving and getting your body moving your heart rate up. Plus stress reduction, sleep, and sunshine. You gotta get the sunlight. That's also why vitamin d 3 is good. Propranolol, also important. Melatonin, this is all about sleep. Right? Metformin. You also have another alternative plus Ivermectin. You have Mebendazole and Fenbendazole. This is also you know versions of of Ivermectin or things out there. Green tea, omega 3 fatty acids, berberine, and then you have, atorvastatin and simvastatin. You have sildenafil and tadalafil. You also have disulfiram, ashwagandha, and, itraconazole. So let's take a look at each one to learn how these types of alternatives work. Glucose and ketogenic. Glucose management through ketogenic diet is an alternative cancer diet that has gained traction in recent years. This diet emphasizes low carbohydrate intake. By reducing glucose spikes, the ketogenic diet aims to create environment where cancer cells cannot thrive. Additionally, the dietary approaches limit carbohydrates to less than 25 grams per day, emphasize omega 3 fatty acids and saturated fats, considerations not suitable for everyone. Goes on to explain here that exercise anaerobic or aerobic and resistance training. Exercise is more than just a fitness regime. It's an integral part of alternative cancer treatments. Regular physical activity has been shown to improve cancer survival rates and enhance quality of life. It is kind of strange, it says that they've been for at least a 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise per week that we live in a day and age where people just don't exercise and they have atrophy. I've I've I've see people in my family, they don't even exercise. Looking at another thing, obviously stress reduction, sleep and sunshine, that again we don't really need to talk about. Vitamin d 3 is more than just a vitamin, it's a hormone that plays a role in cell growth modulation. The levels of vitamin d have been linked to an increased risk of cancer. Supplementing with vitamin d 3 may support the immune system and help prevent cancer cell proliferation. Additionally, supplementation does titration according to vitamin d blood levels. Now considerations, you can continue, to take, you know, d 3. You can take it, orally. It depends. Propranolol, is a beta blocker traditionally used for heart conditions. It is being explored as alternative cancer treatment. It may reduce stress induced cancer progression. Down here, we explained melatonin is a hormone regulating sleep wake cycles as shown promise in cancer therapy due to its antioxidants properties. It may enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiation therapy while protecting normal cells from damage. Now going down even further, metformin, commonly used for type 2 diabetes, is being investigated for its potential in cancer treatment and may inhibit cancer cell growth. And you can find the rest of the story directly there at vigilant news.com. You should check out the rest of them. They're 18. You can read them in-depth, and they go down and explain everything thoroughly. Many of you know that we live in a in an era where things are unpredictable. And if you think our country is going in the right direction, you probably aren't living the same world I am. So if you're feeling alarmed, you're not alone, and in fact, Americans from all walks of life have taken action to prepare for whatever's coming next, and that starts with having an emergency food supply. Storing food in your home is the right thing to do because we're living in crazy times, which explains why so many people are preparing. Right now, you can get ready too with a 3 month emergency food kit from My Patriot Supply. It comes with delicious foods like creamy stroganoff, honey wheat bread, and mushroom rice pilaf. The entire kit offers over 2,000 calories. You'll feel full. It's delicious, nutritious, and the kit lasts 25 years. Literally can't make this up. Who knows what our country will look like then, but when that day comes, you'll be ready. So go to prepare with vnn.com. That's p r e p a r e w I t h. Vnn.com now to order your 3 month emergency food kit from my patrons supply. Prepare with vnn.com. You don't wanna be left without food. We've seen it happen too much with recent hurricanes. People did not have food. And, of course, I mean, if the flood wipes it out, that's one thing. But if you just didn't get prepared, that's another. Don't leave your family without a hitch. Make sure that you check that out today.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

READ MORE: 18 Alternative Cancer Treatments That Work | By @Honest_Medicine https://vigilantnews.com/post/18-alternative-cancer-treatments-that-work/

18 Alternative Cancer Treatments That Work Contrary to common belief, alternative therapies and treatments are found in cancer research around the world. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - Tucker Carlson Rocks the Stage, Delivers Powerful Election Prediction Georgia Trump supporters were electrified when Tucker declared that the “vibe shift” in America has been “so profound” that he doesn’t see any possible way that the Democrats can repeat 2020, including “pretending something else happened.” “I don’t think we can have another 2020 at this point. I just don’t,” Carlson concluded. “I don’t think they can do that again. I don’t. And no matter what they pull two weeks from now, 13 days from now, I don’t think they can get away with standing up and being like on MSNBC, ‘No, actually, Kamala Harris is historically popular, it turns out.’”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes Donald Trump will win the election, regardless of personal preference. They claim the "vibe shift" is profound, with numbers and early voting favoring Trump. More importantly, there's a return to freedom of expression. The speaker asserts that the previous election was rigged because critical information about a candidate was hidden from the public. They believe this cannot happen again, regardless of what tactics are used in the coming weeks. The speaker suggests people will not accept claims of popularity for figures like Kamala Harris, whom they criticize for lacking job experience and consistent pronunciation of her name. They also express frustration with someone raised in Montreal lecturing them about America. The speaker concludes that people have had enough.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so on election day, and I've sincerely believe Donald Trump's gonna win. And if I thought he was gonna lose, I'd be here anyway, by the way. I would. In fact, I would have been here earlier if I thought he was gonna lose, just to make the point. I mean it. I don't like people who jump on the winning train. Okay? I think Donald Trump's gonna win. Yeah. And not only do I think Donald Trump's gonna win, I think that the vibe shift has been so profound. I mean, the numbers suggest he's gonna win. He's ahead in all 7 battleground states. But much more important and the early voting seems to be favoring him. But more important even than the conventional political markers is what you smell around you and it's the return of freedom. It's the return of the country you grew up in where you could say things like, I like that guy and maybe like the other person. That's fine. That was not allowed for 9 years and it's allowed now. And I think and it's because of what they did, by the way. They deserve this. But I think the vibe is so strong right now. I don't think you can get away with pretending something else happened. I don't think we can have another 2020 at this point. I just don't. I don't. Where they hid relevant facts from you, they prevented you from knowing about their candidate and then claim victory with 37,000,000,000 votes or whatever they claim he got. That's rigging the election. Period. If you end if the government prevents people from knowing critical information about a candidate, they have rigged the election. And they did that. Period. Oh, you're not allowed to say that. I'm not allowed to say it because it's a 100% true. And every person who hears it knows it's true, including the people who did it. I don't think they can do that again. I don't. And I don't think no matter what they pull, 2 weeks now, 13 days from now. I don't think they can get away with standing up and being like on MSNBC. No. Actually, Kamala Harris is a historically popular it turns out. Woman who's never had a job who can't even pronounce her own first name consistently. That's how false she is. Some woman who grew up in Montreal, Canada is lecturing me about America. Okay. I don't think they can do that because I don't think people are gonna sit back and take it. I don't. It's enough. It's enough.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The most electrifying moment of the night dropped when Carlson declared that there won’t be any room for stealing the election this time because the American people are no longer “going to sit back and take it.” After tolerating burnt cities, millions of foreign invaders entering the country, and soul-crushing economic conditions, Carlson says the American people have reached their breaking points. As he put it, “When they tell you they’ve won, you can look them straight in the face and say, ‘I’m sorry, Dad’s home, and he’s pissed!’”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts there's a point to stop tolerating unacceptable behavior, comparing it to a teenage girl's rebellious phase that becomes destructive. They claim this "phase" has lasted for years and involves destroying major cities and allowing the country to be invaded by millions of foreigners with unclear purposes, which they believe is threatening. They state "they" are crushing families, making it impossible for kids to buy houses, and getting involved in children's sex lives. The speaker concludes that "they" need to lose and that when "they" claim victory, the appropriate response is to declare, "Dad's home and he's pissed."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's the point at which you say no. I'm sorry. I put up with this crap for a long time. I indulge your little fantasy. It's like when your teenage girl becomes a bitch, Sharon, you're like, okay. That's, you know, well, okay. It's fine. No. I totally understand. You're like, it's a phase. But if that phase goes on for 9 years and includes destroying your major cities and allowing your country to be invaded by millions of foreigners with identities you don't know and its purpose in this country is unclear, by the way, why shouldn't we feel threatened by that? If they go out of their way to crush families, to make it impossible for your kids to buy a house, I mean, getting involved in the sex lives of your children, which they are, if they do all of that, they need to lose. And at the end of all of it, when they tell you they've won, no. You can look them straight in the face and say, I'm sorry. Dad's home and he's pissed. Thank you.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - RFK Jr. Flips the Script on Kamala's Lies About Trump Using the Military on the Public It turns out that the Biden-Harris regime expanded domestic military authority to include LETHAL force. What this means is the Department of Defense now has the power to step in and use lethal force within U.S. borders, even against its own citizens, when it deems lives are at risk. The scope of this authority is chilling because once the Secretary of Defense approves the use of lethal force, the history of the US government tells us that it will be abused to the maximum extent possible. Remember when the unvaccinated and the unmasked were shamed, considered health threats to others, and barred from society? Now imagine that same nightmare unfolding when the US military has authorization to use lethal force on American citizens when it deems lives are at risk. For years, Alex Jones warned about martial law and domestic military control. Now, the Biden-Harris regime is making that a terrifying reality while accusing Donald Trump of being guilty of their own actions.

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Harris stated that Trump would turn the US military against the American public to promote his agenda. However, the Biden-Harris administration allegedly enacted a directive two weeks prior that changed the law to make it legal for the U.S. military to use lethal force against American citizens on American soil. The speaker claims that under this directive, the U.S. military can legally shoot and kill Americans who engage in political protest because they disagree with White House policies. The speaker emphasizes that this initiative came from the Democratic party, not during the Trump administration, and is the reason they left the party.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say one other thing. President Harris said today in her post, in her speech, he said that president Trump was gonna turn the US military against the American public and use the public to promote his agenda. How many of you think that is true? Well, what's interesting to me is that Biden Harris administration has done something 2 weeks ago that has never been done in American history, which is to send exactly legal force to send a directive to the pentagon, changing the law to make it legal for the US military to be used to use lethal force against American citizens on American soil. Technically, now it's legal. The US military, under this directive, it will become legal for the US military to shoot and kill Americans who engage in political protest because they disagree with policies in the White House. I'm not making this up. Any of you can look it up. This is a democratic initiative. This did not come during the Trump administration. This did not come from Donald Trump. It came from the Democratic party, and that's why I left the Democratic party.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - The British CEO who plotted to kill Elon Musk's 𝕏 has now been caught orchestrating a “BLACK OPS” campaign to silence Robert Kennedy Jr. What this means is there was a covert order by the UK's CCDH to shut RFK Jr. down by any means necessary because they were “nervous” about his “impact” on “the election.” Why is the UK's Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) orchestrating a “black operation” on a US political figure? While the mainstream media shouts, “Russia! Russia! Russia!” it seems the real foreign election interference is coming from the UK’s censorship czars.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - The latest Trump accuser, who chose to fully roll out her accusations two weeks before the presidential election, is actually a Democrat activist. An ex-model named Stacey Williams came forward with her story, alleging that former President Donald Trump touched her inappropriately 31 years ago. Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt wholly blasted these claims, noting that the accusations were made by someone who is “a former activist for Barack Obama,” noting that these accusations were also “announced on a Harris campaign call two weeks before the election.” She said they are “unequivocally false.” Read More: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/10/24/latest-trump-accuser-is-another-democrat-activist/

Latest Donald Trump Accuser Is Another Democrat Activist The latest Donald Trump accuser, who chose to roll out her accusations two weeks before the election, is actually a Democrat activist. breitbart.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - Woke doc refused to publish $10 million trans kids study that showed puberty blockers didn’t help mental health. A prominent doctor and trans rights advocate admitted she deliberately withheld publication of a $10 million taxpayer-funded study on the effect of puberty blockers on American children — after finding no evidence that they improve patients’ mental health. Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy told the New York Times that she believes the study would be “weaponized” by critics of transgender care for kids, and that the research could one day be used in court to argue “we shouldn’t use blockers.” Critics — including one of Olson-Kennedy’s fellow researchers on the study — said the decision flies in the face of research standards and deprives the public of “really important” science in a field where Americans remain firmly divided. Read More: https://nypost.com/2024/10/23/us-news/doctor-refused-to-publish-trans-kids-study-that-showed-puberty-blockers-didnt-help-mental-health/

Woke doc refused to publish $10 million trans kids study that showed puberty blockers didn’t help mental health Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy told the New York Times that she believes the study would be "weaponized" by critics of transgender care for kids, and that the research could one day be used in court to argue "we shouldn't use blockers." nypost.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine #4 - Anderson Cooper Drops Bomb on Kamala Harris: You’ve Been in the White House for 4 Years. Why Haven’t You Done Any of This Already? https://vigilantnews.com/post/anderson-cooper-drops-bomb-on-kamala-harris-youve-been-in-the-white-house-for-4-years-why-havent-you-done-any-of-this-already/

Anderson Cooper Drops Bomb on Kamala Harris: You’ve Been in the White House for 4 Years. Why Haven’t You Done Any of This Already?  This is just embarrassing... vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine #3 - CNN’s Van Jones Hammers Kamala’s ‘Evasions’ During CNN Town Hall, Says ‘Word Salad Stuff’ Is Annoying https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/10/24/van-jones-harris-had-needless-evasions-during-cnn-town-hall-word-salad-stuff-is-annoying/

Van Jones: Harris Had Needless 'Evasions' During CNN Town Hall, 'Word Salad Stuff' Is Annoying Van Jones said Vice President Kamala Harris unnecessarily dodged some questions during her town hall with CNN. | Clips breitbart.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine #2 - Trump first with the ultimate tax cut: no income taxes at all.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#1 - BART workers fired due to COVID vaccine mandate to get over $1M each, federal jury decides. There are six of them total in the lawsuit and each will receive more than $1 million. The employees claimed religious exemptions to the vaccine mandate but say they were not accommodated by the transit agency, and subsequently lost their job. BART did initially grant vaccine exemptions, but the plaintiffs argued they weren't accommodated. An accommodation could have meant that they were able to work from home or get COVID tested regularly for COVID. They argued none of that happened and they lost their job. On the eve of Thanksgiving, many unvaccinated BART employees learned their requests for a religious exemption to the COVID vaccine mandate was denied. In total, BART must now pay a combined $7.8 million to all six former employees. Read More: https://abc7news.com/post/bart-workers-fired-due-covid-vaccine-mandate-get-1-million-each-federal-jury-decides/15464182/

BART workers fired due to COVID vaccine mandate to get over $1M each, federal jury decides A federal jury has sided with fired BART workers who sued the agency claiming they lost their jobs over a COVID vaccine mandate. abc7news.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine BONUS #1 - Michael Cohen’s Attempt to Take Down Trump Gets Obliterated by the Supreme Court https://vigilantnews.com/post/michael-cohens-attempt-to-take-down-trump-just-got-obliterated-by-the-supreme-court/

Michael Cohen’s Attempt to Take Down Trump Just Got Obliterated by the Supreme Court Put a fork in it. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine BONUS #2 - The True Impact of COVID Vaccines Based on Autopsy Reports https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-true-impact-of-covid-vaccines-based-on-autopsy-reports/

The True Impact of COVID Vaccines Based on Autopsy Reports Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Jessica Rose explore a dramatic increase in autopsies linked to adverse events following COVID-19 vaccinations. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine BONUS #3 - How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/

How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine BONUS #4 - How to Clean Your Arteries with One Simple Fruit https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-clean-your-arteries-with-one-simple-fruit/

How to Clean Your Arteries with One Simple Fruit Let this delicious fruit work its artery opening magic. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine BONUS #5 - Alex Jones Issues Terrifying Post-Election Prediction https://vigilantnews.com/post/alex-jones-fires-off-a-chilling-warning-to-america/

Alex Jones Issues Terrifying Post-Election Prediction Let’s hope he's wrong about this. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Honest_Medicine Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page before you go. In other news, Bill Gates is now in trouble for lying to the public about the COVID vaccines. See more details on that below: https://t.co/OYWbgdwmis

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Dutch court orders Bill Gates to stand trial over COVID-19 vaccines. Seven vaccine-injured plaintiffs allege that Bill Gates and others “misled people into taking Covid-19 injections, while they knew or should have known that these injections were not safe and effective.” The lawsuit also targets former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and key members of the Dutch government’s COVID response team. The bombshell came when Gates tried to evade the case by arguing that, as a U.S. citizen, he should not be subject to Dutch legal proceedings. However, the court ruled that due to Gates’ close connection with other defendants under Dutch jurisdiction, he IS subject to trial in the Netherlands. Now, Gates and his legal team must confront these serious allegations in court, with a new hearing set for November 27th of this year. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The most urgent invention is a COVID-19 vaccine, which teaches the immune system about the pathogen, specifically the coronavirus and its spike protein. The spike protein grabs cells and causes them to make billions of copies of the virus. Vaccines expose the body to something that looks like the virus, prompting the body to create antibodies to kill it. Vaccine creation usually involves injecting part of the virus's shape. This can be the whole virus (attenuated), a killed virus, or just a piece of the virus, like the spike. A promising new method is the RNA vaccine, which uses instructions to make the spike's shape. The Gates Foundation and partners are exploring these efforts. Creating a new vaccine typically takes at least 5 years, but there is optimism that a vaccine will be available in the next 18 months, produced in volume, and accessible worldwide, which is how the pandemic will end.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most urgent invention in the world right now is a vaccine that prevents you from getting COVID 19. What vaccines do is they teach your immune system about the pathogen. This is the coronavirus, and this shape on its outside is called the spike protein. It grabs on to the cells in your body that have a particular receptor and get that cell to make billions of copies of this virus. The first time that you're exposed to this virus, it takes literally days for your immune system to realize that it's a bad thing. So how do we get the immune system to go faster? Well, the idea of a vaccine is to give you an exposure to something that looks like this, so you're getting your body to make a lot of antibodies that can take these viruses and actually kill them. There's over a 100 different efforts making many different types of coronavirus vaccines. So how do you make a vaccine? Usually, you're injecting at least part of the shape of the virus. Sometimes you do the whole virus, but it's attenuated so it doesn't multiply too much. Sometimes you take the virus and you kill it. You won't get sick because they're not duplicating. What's typically done is you just take either a piece of the virus or just the spike, that thing on the surface, and you put it on something else. So there's no risk at all of causing the disease. One final way that's new and is promising is called the RNA vaccine. With RNA and DNA, instead of putting that shape in, you put instructions in the code to make that shape. So the Gates Foundation, along with a great number of partners, are looking at these different efforts. We've never created a new vaccine in less than 5 years, so this is urgent, and it's gonna require incredible collaboration. It's gonna have to go to 7,000,000,000 people. So I am optimistic that one of the vaccine efforts will give us vaccines in the next 18 months, and we'll make sure that it's produced in volume and that it's accessible to everyone in the world. That's how we're gonna end this pandemic.
Saved - November 14, 2024 at 9:45 PM

@DavidWolfe - David Wolfe

Dr Paul Thomas was de-licensed for telling the Truth about vaccines—he let his patients choose the childhood vaccine schedules that parents wanted. This is what he found. https://t.co/iWTTyHBNHZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
We analyzed every patient in my practice without excluding anyone. We categorized over 500 unvaccinated children and more than 3,700 vaccinated ones. The findings were surprising: unvaccinated children experienced fewer illnesses and chronic conditions. The data clearly showed that as vaccination rates increased, so did health issues like infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental problems, eczema, allergies, and anemia. The contrast between vaccinated and unvaccinated children was striking. If I had known this information before my daughter was born, I would have made different choices. Every parent wants the best for their child and deserves access to all relevant information to make informed decisions. I share this in hopes that it helps others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were definitely looking at every single patient born in my practice. There was no cherry picking. There was no we're gonna exclude you for this or that. Every baby born was looked at, and we looked at every single office visit. We stratified them according to the number of vaccines they had. Okay. So, basically, we had over 500 who had 0 vaccines, and then we had another 3,700 and some who had some vaccines. And what we found, Dell, was actually even mind boggling for myself. What I was clearly seeing was these kids don't get sick. They don't get chronic conditions. Well, the data spoke for itself, and you're showing your viewers the graph. Those orange lines are, over time, over that ten and a half years, the more vaccines you had, the worse you were for whether we looked at infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies. It doesn't matter what we looked at. Even just plain old anemia skyrockets in the vaccinated when compared to the blue line, the unvaccinated. Wow. This data is so powerful. Speaker 1: If I had access to this information before my daughter was born, I would have made very different choices. Every parent wants the best for their child. Every parent deserves access to all the information to make an informed choice. I share this because I wish someone would share it with me.
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 11:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a report revealing that many celebrities, officials, and European elites allegedly falsified their vaccination records. They reportedly received fake saline injections instead of the mRNA vaccines and paid large sums for counterfeit passports recorded in the National Immunizations Registry.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Vaccination records were falsified by thousands of celebrities, officials and European elites who gave themselves fake saline injections instead of the deadly mRNA jabs. According to a new police report, elites paid vast amount of cash to have fake passports made and recorded in the National Immunizations Registry. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/2000-hollywood-celebrities-european-elite-caught-with-fake-vaccination-passports/

2,000 Hollywood Celebrities, European Elite Caught with Fake Vaccination Passports Vaccination records were falsified by thousands of celebrities, officials and European elites who gave themselves fake saline injections instead of the deadly mRNA jabs. thepeoplesvoice.tv
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 3:57 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

She was right. https://t.co/fV6hzrknbn

Saved - March 13, 2025 at 5:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has admitted to faking numerous research studies published in medical journals, marking a significant case of research fraud in medical history. He accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer in 2005 to study Celebrex, but no patients were ever enrolled in the study. This led to the retraction of 10 papers from the journal Anesthesia & Analgesia and the discovery of 21 other fabricated articles. Facing a plea agreement, he must return $420,000 and could face up to 10 years in prison. He was also fired from his position at Baystate Medical Center.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals. Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study! Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway. It wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data onBextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal. As a result of Dr. Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben. The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted. After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine. He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years. No worries, they don't fake research studies when it's concerning vaccines. 😳

Saved - March 31, 2025 at 11:25 AM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Horrific! Doctor Sentenced to 45 Years in Prison for lying to Patients about having Cancer and receiving 17.5 Million Dollars in Kickbacks from Chemo Companies https://t.co/dIAJxith9r

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Michigan doctor, Farid Fatah, was sentenced to 45 years in prison for misdiagnosing over 550 patients with cancer and prescribing unnecessary treatments. In court, the 50-year-old doctor said he misused his talents and allowed sin to enter him because of power and greed. One patient recounted hearing him promise to save her mother. Fata pleaded guilty to intentionally misdiagnosing patients, earning over $17,000,000. One patient described the experience as extremely emotional.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Begin with that breaking headline today. A Michigan doctor sentenced being called a monster. A day of reckoning for the doctor who diagnosed hundreds of patients with cancer when they did not have it. Outside the court, the tears and anger he lied to so many patients, giving many of them extensive chemotherapy, which then made them sick. So many of those families today coming face to face with the doctor as he was sentenced to forty five years behind bars, and you're about to hear what the doctor said to those families. ABC's Ron Claiborne leads us off. Speaker 1: Judgement day for the doctor who caused so much pain. Victims of doctor Farid Fatah outside the courtroom where he was sentenced hand in hand then defiant. Forty five years for the lives that he took. It just wasn't enough. Right? In court, the 50 year old doctor breaking down saying, I misused my talents. Yes. And permitted this sin to enter me because of power and greed. But those words, no comfort for Cheryl Blades. I could hear him talking to my mother because I went to every appointment. So I could hear him talking to her and promising her to save her. In all, Fata pleaded guilty to intentionally misdiagnosing more than 550 patients, often prescribing treatment for cancer that they did not have. He earned more than $17,000,000 as a result. Doctor Fata pounced on every opportunity to use a patient's body as a profit center. One of the patients, 53 year old Monica Flag. Stressful. It was extremely emotional. In Speaker 0: two
Saved - April 14, 2025 at 1:54 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

ARREST this Monster. CDC doctor monitoring bad ‘Covid Vaccines’ reactions may have deleted files. https://t.co/Yej17AhPFy

Saved - April 23, 2025 at 10:34 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

In 2008, CNN aired a segment about a Hannah Poling, a girl who contracted autism as a toddler due to vaccines. Her father, a neurologist, claimed that the HHS ADMITTED her autism came from vaccines 👇 https://t.co/KEPjVjdkiE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. John Polling, a neurologist and father of an autistic child, claims the government conceded that vaccines contributed to his daughter Hannah's autism, encephalopathy, and seizures. He says he wouldn't have believed it until he witnessed his daughter's regression after vaccination. While experts maintain vaccines don't cause autism, Polling believes Hannah had a predisposition that vaccines triggered. He clarifies that mitochondrial dysfunction, often cited as a rare underlying cause, is not necessarily rare or underlying. Polling stresses he is pro-vaccine and advocates for safe vaccination schedules tailored to individual patients, urging pediatricians to prioritize individual patient care. He acknowledges multiple potential triggers for autism but believes vaccines were the clear trigger in his daughter's case. He is scheduled to appear on Larry King tonight to discuss the issue further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some parents of autistic children blame childhood vaccines. You may remember nine year old Hannah Polling. Recently, the government's so called vaccine court conceded her family's claim that vaccines may have helped trigger Hannah's autism. Our chief medical correspondent Doctor. Sanjay Gupta is back with more on that debate on this Autism Awareness Day. Speaker 1: Sanjay? Don, thank you. We are here with Doctor. John Polling. He is, first of all, he's a neurologist. He's also the father of Hana Polling, as you just mentioned. Her her case of autism diagnosis was conceded by the federal government as having been contributed to by vaccines. That was a pretty startling thing, I think, for a lot of people to hear. We talked to a lot of experts about this. They say, look, vaccines in no way cause autism. You're a neurologist. You're also the father of Hannah. What do you say? Speaker 2: Well, think you bring up a really important point is that the government, actually the Department of Health and Human Services, conceded that my daughter's medical problems, which are autism, encephalopathy, seizures were brought on by vaccination. Know, Speaker 1: it's That's startling, I think, for a lot of people to hear that. Because we've been taught for so long. You're a doctor. I'm a doctor. We go to medical school, we hear this vaccines, obviously. There's so many good things about vaccines. They prevent, you know, life threatening illnesses that we've heard about. But in but in your daughter's case, turned out to be to be a problem. Speaker 2: I wouldn't have believed it till it happened to me. To be honest with you as a doctor, until it happened to me, until I saw the regression, until I saw a normal 18 old toddler descend into autism, I wouldn't have believed it was possible. Speaker 1: The experts that I've talked to, including the head of the, director of the CDC, Doctor. Julie Gerberding says that was a rare case. That is not likely to be the norm or even that's likely to be an exception. What do you say to that? Speaker 2: Well, I think a lot of the media outlets have put out a statement that says rare underlying genetic mitochondrial disease. Now that's five words. Four of those are not accurate in the sense that we know now, we didn't know back in 02/2001, that mitochondrial dysfunction is rare, you know, actually not rare. Two, we don't know if it was underlying or if it was something developed later, although certainly there's some genetic underpinnings to it. And the only word correct is mitochondrial and the difference between disease and dysfunction which we talked about. Speaker 1: Right. So what you believe is that Hannah have some sort of predisposition and then the vaccines tipped her over the edge into developing autism. What is your belief now? Speaker 2: Well, I don't think that vaccines are the only way that you can tip over a child like Hannah to regress and have an encephalopathy and have a regress into autism. There are probably multiple triggers. In my daughter, clearly it was the vaccinations. That was our experience. As far as other families' experiences, it may be different. The other cases that were at Johns Hopkins, there were only a few like Hannah and then others regressed for other reasons. It's not really a known entity. Speaker 1: You know, think the thing that a lot of parents, and I have to tell you, as a doctor, now as a parent too, as you know, have two daughters, so I have a two and a half year old and a 13 old. What does that mean for me, John? I mean, because, you know, I think they're perfectly normal. I mean, seem to me to be in there delightful. And I plan on getting them vaccinated. I got my two and a half year old vaccinated on time. What what advice would you have now having gone through what you've you've gone through? Speaker 2: Well, first and foremost, I am pro vaccine. I'm in favor of safe vaccination. I I'm the last person that wants to see measles or polio come back. I had one of the only cases last year of West Nile induced polio here in Georgia, and it's devastating. I think what a parent needs to do now is, talk with their pediatrician and pediatricians need to actually have a grassroots movement amongst the pediatricians and the AAP to develop safe vaccine schedules for each individual patient. I mean, you and I are physicians and we took an oath to our individual patient. We didn't take an oath for the public health or the greater good. So each pediatrician has to focus on that. Speaker 1: All right. Well, Doctor. John Polin, you're going be joining us a lot throughout the day today. I appreciate this. This is an issue we're going to keep on as you know. And Don and Brianna, you know we're investigating this all day long obviously. Toss it back to you now. We'll keep talking. Thanks. Speaker 0: Yeah, and I'm hearing he's going be on Larry King tonight Sanjay. Speaker 1: That's right. You're going be on Larry King and and with a few other guests as well. Speaker 2: So Yes. Yes. Speaker 1: I look forward to that. Speaker 2: I should point out to Hannah's godfather. He's a pediatrician, and and I trust these folks are going to look at this issue and develop a a safe protocol for us. Speaker 1: Well, lot of parents paying attention to what you're saying right now, so thanks again for joining us. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 0: All right. Thank you very much for that, Doctor. Poling, and also our chief medical correspondent, Doctor. Sanjay Gupta. Laurie King, of course, airs tonight 9PM Eastern here on CNN. With all the conflicting data out there, how can you tell whether your child may be autistic? Our medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen joins us next hour with a test for parents. And you can read more about autism online at CNN.com and share your personal stories with iReport. You can learn more about this mysterious illness. And we have a virtual resource center for those with autism. Just log on to CNN.com/autism.
Saved - August 9, 2025 at 4:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I delivered an emotional apology to my former patients, acknowledging my failure to fully understand and communicate the risks associated with vaccines throughout my medical career. I expressed my regret for the lack of education in medical schools regarding vaccines, their contents, and informed consent. I highlighted the significant payouts for vaccine injuries, a topic rarely discussed among providers. I admitted my shortcomings in not providing safety sheets before vaccinations and took full responsibility for my actions.

@CMDRVALTHOR - VAL THOR

Doctor Breaks Down as He Apologizes for Vaccine Ignorance: "I Failed to Give Informed Consent" Dr. Daniel Neides delivered an emotional apology to his former patients, admitting he had not fully understood or communicated the risks and details surrounding vaccines during his medical career. “There is no education in medical schools that I am aware of… around vaccines, their contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program,” he said through tears. Reflecting on his training, he added, “What are we taught about vaccines? We are taught to memorise the vaccine schedule.” Dr. Neides also pointed to the nearly $4 billion paid out to vaccine-injured individuals since 1992—a fact he says most providers, including himself, never discussed. “I was one of those providers who didn’t give safety sheets before vaccinating,” he admitted. “Absolutely deplorable on my part, and I apologise to my patients.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
1. No education in medical schools about vaccines—contents, safety, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. 2. 1986 Congress enacted legislation removing all liability from pharma related to vaccine adverse events. 3. We are taught to memorize the vaccine schedule and will have to memorize it again for boards. 4. Almost $4,000,000,000 has been paid to vaccine-injured patients since 1992; fairness in information is questioned. 5. There is a conflict of interest regarding payments to providers for completing vaccine schedules. 6. Patients are dismissed from practices because of vaccine safety concerns; questioning may lead to termination. 7. Employers are forcing flu vaccine or face corrective action or job loss. 8. Lack of informed consent and failure to provide safety sheets; no awareness of the compensation program. 9. Lack of transparency about vaccine complications; patients are shamed for adverse events; example of penicillin allergy recorded after rash.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So these are my big issues regarding vaccines and these are the things that I'd like to highlight. Number one: There is no education in medical schools that I am aware of and being an educator at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine and Case Western Reserve University, I am not aware of education around vaccines, their contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. We do not discuss that in 1986 Congress enacted legislation removing all liability from pharma related to vaccine adverse events. What are we taught about vaccines? We are taught to memorize the vaccine schedule. And actually I'm gonna be sitting for my family medicine boards this year and I am sure that I will have to memorize that schedule again in order to pass that exam. We don't discuss that almost $4,000,000,000 with a B has been paid to vaccine injured patients since 1992. For medical professionals, we expect fair balance. But vaccines seem to be absolved from that consideration. Number two, there appears to be a conflict of interest regarding payments to providers for completing vaccine schedules. Corollary to that, which would be number three, patients are being dismissed from practices because of quote unquote vaccine safety concerns. If you bring question about a vaccine and you decide not to vaccinate your child, you may be at risk of being terminated from that practice. Absolutely deplorable and disgusting. Number four, and again to the Bailey family, I'm really sorry, but employers are forcing employees to receive the flu vaccine or face corrective action or job loss. The fact that your dad was six months from retiring isn't a number five. There's a lack of informed consent and I was one of those providers who didn't provide safety sheets before vaccinating. I would tell the parents these are the vaccines today. We're going to give you three vaccines in one leg and two in the other. And then after vaccinating either the child or the adult patient, here's your information sheet. And again, to be completely transparent with you, I had no idea that there was even a mention of the compensation program or a telephone number to call. Absolutely deplorable on my part and I apologize to my patients. Number six, there's a lack of transparency regarding vaccine complications. And worse, you're being shamed as patients for suggesting that you were harmed by a vaccine. If I see a patient in the office and diagnose strep throat and give them penicillin, and either the mom or the patient themselves calls and tells me that they developed a rash, there is zero question. The chart now states they have an allergy to penicillin and will never be given it again. Why don't we believe parents and patients when they tell us they have had an adverse event regarding a vaccine? It doesn't sense to me as a medical professional. I apologize for the being emotional.
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 4:06 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

RFK Jr just exposed that 36,000+ doctors had their Medicare payments manipulated to push childhood vaccines. This isn’t medicine — it’s bribery. Big Pharma & government turned doctors into sales reps. The corruption is staggering. https://t.co/gxnBOtZUX8

Saved - September 25, 2025 at 3:42 PM

@chrisbrunet - Chris Brunet

Canadian Detective Found Guilty of Investigating Infant Deaths Linked to mRNA Vaccines 🧵 Full investigation below: https://t.co/30tSmVUzcL

Saved - October 27, 2025 at 3:42 PM

@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser

"One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people." "Within a year, 36 of them were dead." "And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that." https://t.co/kAnmsiclEx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts an evolution in perspective: they were on board at the beginning, a stance they say cannot be disputed by others. However, they state that data revealed an issue that “shouldn’t be happening” and describe it in terms of excess deaths. The speaker insists that the data shows a stark pattern across vaccination events, detailing a specific anecdote: “one vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people. And within a year, thirty six of them were dead.” They quantify the improbability of this outcome with the claim that it represents “one point eight trillion to one against.” The speaker emphasizes that this is not an isolated occurrence but is part of a larger set of similar instances. They assert that “there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that all over New Zealand,” underscoring the breadth of the pattern they perceive in the data. In summation, the speaker insists that the observed excess deaths following vaccination ought to be unacceptable, stating simply: “That should never happen. The odds.” The overall message centers on a perceived discrepancy between initial support for vaccination and the data-driven claim of extraordinary rates of death among those vaccinated, expressed through a highly improbable odds figure and a claim of widespread, recurring examples across New Zealand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you noticed the ninety one what was it? The I was all on board at the beginning, and that's something that they cannot dispute. But I saw something in the data based on my experience that shouldn't be happening, and that was the excess deaths which you're referring to. One vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people. And within a year, thirty six of them were dead, and that is one point eight trillion to one against. That should never happen. The odds. Yeah. And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that all over New Zealand. That's what I've to judge. One of them.
Saved - October 28, 2025 at 11:14 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

This is completely shocking… "One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people." "Within a year, 36 of them were dead." "And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that." https://t.co/pqCMSdEEY9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says they were on board at the beginning, but based on their data and experience, excess deaths are occurring. They reference “one vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people,” and state that “within a year, thirty six of them were dead,” adding that this is “one point eight trillion to one against.” They assert, “That should never happen. The odds.” The speaker notes there are “hundreds and hundreds of instances like that,” across New Zealand. They claim this is “what got the church. One of them.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you noticed the ninety one what was it? The Yeah. I was all on board at the beginning, and that's something that they cannot dispute. But I saw something in the data based on my experience that shouldn't be happening, and that was the excess deaths which you're referring to. One vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people. And within a year, thirty six of them were dead, and that is one point eight trillion to one against. That should never happen. The odds. And there are yeah. And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that. All over New Zealand. That's what got the church. One of them.
View Full Interactive Feed