reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@RonEng1ish - ๐ฌ๐งRonEnglish๐ฌ๐ง๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ
Zabul, Afghanistan - This week. A woman is murdered in front of her children. Following the death of her husband, his brother wanted to "claim" the grief stricken widow. She resisted ๐ฆ๐ซ Any marches planned? https://t.co/BBItwjyiXL
@muhammadshehad2 - Muhammad Shehada
๐จIsrael executed a 13-year-old child, Nahed Barbakh, in Khan Younis when he went outside with a WHITE FLAG to check the road to evacuate his family. His brother Ramiz (20) rushed to rescue him & was promptly executed. They were murdered next to their white flags! https://t.co/qxQm5JsNfN
@MyLordBebo - Lord Bebo
๐ต๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑโผ๏ธ๐จ INHUMANE: The 13-year-old Nahed Barbakh went outside with a WHITE FLAG to check if the road is safe for evacuation with his family. He was shot with the white flag. His brother Ramiz rushed to rescue him and was shot as well. https://t.co/rR5AJ5OWoy
@SaeedDiCaprio - Hurt CoPain
they fired at them for trying to get FOOD. what the actual hell??? https://t.co/ol6O9ZC96P
@Timesofgaza - TIMES OF GAZA
"Amr! My brother! My leg! Amr wake up! Someone help us!" 2 brothers Amr and Muhammad Al Farra were tragically murdered by an Israeli sniper as they were inspecting their home in Khan-Younis. They were left to bleed out with nobody able to help them until they died. https://t.co/LOY7idG51N
@Dxxn - Dina
โAid distribution was canceled as it was not secured and those responsible for it became martyrs.โ https://t.co/8uysCaEtLE
@MarinaMedvin - Marina Medvin ๐บ๐ธ
Palestinians targeting their own for taking humanitarian aid without Hmas approval. One of the victims is a child. https://t.co/wdtN91WktP
@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson
They killed him https://t.co/XSyDv7eJNB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael Jackson had a list of enemies in the industry, all of whom were Jewish. There was controversy over his will, signed in LA while he was in New York, leaving his estate to those he distrusted. He accused his former manager and Sony of financial misconduct. Rabbi Shmueli threatened the speaker, who was warned not to "mess with Jews."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Michael Jackson did keep a list of people in the industry that he said were his enemies. Okay? On that list were people that all happened to be Jewish. Music exec Tommy Mottola, Rabbi Shmueli Botich, you may have heard of him, and I'm gonna mention him later. Also, Michael Jackson's former manager Dieter Weisner.
Speaker 1: Because of his will, that was probably fake and filed right before his death. So the will was signed on July 7th in Los Angeles by 3 witnesses, but Jackson's family pointed out that he was in New York that day, and there's video proving it. John Branca was put in charge of his estate, the 230,000,000, but far more importantly, his 50% share of Sony ATV worth 750,000,000. Yes. He was taking on Sony.
In 2,030, Jackson fired Bronco because he was siphoning money out of Jackson's accounts in collusion with Sony Music CEO, Tommy Mottola, and funneling it through a bunch of offshore accounts in the Caribbean.
Speaker 0: And suddenly, they were alleging that he signed a new will and handed everything over to the very people that he was fighting, the very people that he was saying were colluding to take things from him. He signed this new will in a place that he simply wasn't at. I was being threatened by a person named rabbi Schmooly, person that Michael Jackson put on his enemy list. It was also his daughter. They're messaging me saying don't mess with Jews, and they have not stopped.
@hartgoat - Washingtons ghost
This was nothing more than a state sanctioned hit https://t.co/k6TZ9DJZYn
Video Transcript AI Summary
ATF agents raided a home, covering the doorbell camera. When the homeowner investigated, he was shot and killed by the ATF. His wife was detained for hours. Despite policies requiring body cameras, none were used. This raises concerns about government overreach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: ATF agents in full SWAT gear approached the front door. They had a piece of tape ready to cover the camera lens of the doorbell camera, which they did. Next, missus Malinowski heard only a loud crash as her front door caved in. This Brian Malinowski story is wild and it makes me feel like maybe the ATF is the bad guy. Check this out.
Her husband Brian woke up to the sound of the crash, found a pistol, loaded a magazine, and left the bedroom to investigate. Brian warned his wife to stay behind the bedroom, but mayor stubbornly followed him down the hallway. ATF apparently killed electricity to the home. The front room was usually well lit at night, but missus Malinowski saw only darkness as she peered down towards the front entryway. She could only see shadowy outlines of presumed Home Invaders standing in her front hallway.
That's what Brian saw too. Brian fired a few shots at the intruder's feet to drive them back out of the front door. The ATF shot Brian in the head. His wife was standing inches away from him. A mere 57 seconds.
57 seconds elapsed from the time agents covered the doorbell camera until gunshots erupted and Brian was fatally wounded. 60246 to 60343. Agents immediately dragged missus Malinowski into the front yard. She was barefoot, wearing minimal night clothing, and the temperature was 34 degrees. They locked her in the back seat of a car and detained her there for 4 hours, refusing her many requests to check on her husband wouldn't allow her to get close or even use the neighbor's bathroom.
Even though policies have been in place at both the ATF and the Little Rock Police Department for the past 3 years, requiring the use of body worn cameras when executing any search warrant, the Department of Justice tells us that no body cameras were used. If this isn't the weaponization of government, I don't know what is. I completely agree.
@Bernadotte22 - Emelia ๐ธ๐ช
They killed his parents in front of him๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ https://t.co/CYdU9Hf3x2
@stairwayto3dom - The Saviour
๐๐ต๐ธ She went out to search for food for her children and Israel MURDERED her! https://t.co/K0DqgujlBB
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
They shot and killed the Trump supporter right behind him in broad daylight. https://t.co/oAkCoGSWgr
@Nadira_ali12 - Nadira Ali๐ต๐ธ
Her family was hungry, ๐ฎ๐ฑThey shot her for fun! https://t.co/yfs9QOS5zm
@NourNaim88 - Nour Naim| ูููุฑ
A girl takes a final look at her brother after he was killed today My dear, this pain will never subside or fade. Since I bid farewell to my brother Anas & lived through this moment,I feel like I am no longer myself We will never forget or forgive, no matter how much time passes https://t.co/fGNGXq39AZ
@DrEliDavid - Dr. Eli David
Yesterday this man in Gaza recorded this video saying โsave us from Hรmas, not from the Jewsโ ๐ Today he was found dead, having been stabbed in the neck. https://t.co/T7TmqGshbV
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
He was killed a few days after this interview ๐ https://t.co/pw5JUJvDQq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims South Africa faces up to 50% unemployment and poverty due to the banking system. They assert that the country must control its monetary system, with the state creating the money supply to achieve prosperity and high growth rates.
The speaker alleges international bankers are undermining President Zuma for not following their dictates. They believe these bankers aim to exploit South Africa by increasing its debt, similar to Nigeria and the DRC.
The speaker suggests, as their own view, that these international bankers may be responsible for the murders of white farmers to reduce the food supply, forcing South Africa to import food and incur more debt. They state that South Africa has stopped being an exporter of agricultural products since 2007.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The paradigm has to be revisited. We cannot continue with 27%, but possibly up to 50% unemployment, 50% of the people living below the poverty datum line. This has got to stop somewhere and it's the banking system, which is the root cause of all this. And until we address it, we will continue in our downward spiral. It's our country.
Are we sovereign or are we not sovereign? Do we have the right to determine the banking system that suits us? And if we do not take the decision, we will continue to be a colony of the international bankers. And the only way we can get our eventual freedom is to change the paradigm and get total control of our monetary system where the money supply is created by the state and we have a permanent money supply, not a temporary one where banks create money and then destroy it when it's paid back. And in that manner, we can then get prosperity, we can decrease the unemployment and achieve growth rates of 6%, 8%, 9%, 10%.
There were rumors that they have been undermining President Zuma, that they were responsible for last year's rights at various universities. I can't confirm them but it certainly it fits a pattern that if you do not go according to their dictates, they will make life difficult for you. And I believe President Zuma has adopted an independent stance which is not acceptable to them and that is why they are trying to undermine his rule. All sorts of allegations are made about him and I don't know if they are true but certainly it conforms to a pattern And I believe that this process can continue. They want so called rulers to serve their interests.
And what interests are those, Mr. Gutzon? In order to exploit this country, and one of the methods is, of course, is to get the country more in debt, as we've seen in Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where they currently pay 100% of their export earnings on interest. So in other words, the countries who buy the oil and the minerals from the DRC are effectively not paying it because the money which they lend, they create out of thin air and they want to apply this process to South Africa and one of the tactics and this is my own view is that they are responsible for the murders of white farmers because they want the food supply to be reduced and I mean, since 2007, we've stopped being an exporter of agricultural products And I believe they may be behind the farm murders in order to reduce our food supply, which means we'll have to import food and we have to take out more loans, we get more integrated debt and have to pay more
@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields
A teenager carries the body of his little brother https://t.co/9Dken6CNDo
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
โOh my love, come on get up, I brought you chipsโ Israel just murdered his brother, Mansour. https://t.co/Z897Eoasrn
@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser
RFK Jr. explains why his uncle JFK was assassinated. https://t.co/H027lnnjWx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Uncle John Kennedy understood the CIA's purpose was to create new wars. Eisenhower warned against the military-industrial complex. Two months after his inauguration, the military and intelligence approached Kennedy about invading Cuba, but he refused, stating the U.S. shouldn't dictate other countries' governments.
Despite Kennedy's refusal to use the U.S. military, the Bay of Pigs invasion proceeded. When the operation failed and military intervention was requested, Kennedy again refused, realizing he had been deceived. He then wanted to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces.
During his presidency, Kennedy resisted military and intelligence pressures to enter Laos and Vietnam. He sent military advisors to Vietnam but refused to deploy 250,000 combat troops. After learning that 75 Americans had died, Kennedy ordered all U.S. troops out of Vietnam in October 1963. A month later, he was killed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Uncle John Kennedy, he realized early on that the purpose of the CIA and the intelligence apparatus was to create a constant pipeline of new wars. Eisenhower, who is the outgoing president, gave what is probably the most important speech in American history, which was, you know, where he warned against the military industrial complex. I was at my uncle's inauguration. I was in Washington that day, you know, a six year old boy. And two months later, the military and intelligence came to him and said, we gotta invade Cuba.
And he was like, I'm not going to Cuba, and I'm not gonna let the military. And they said, well, we got all these Cubans trained, they're gonna go attack Castro. And he said, well, we're the US government can't be doing that. I don't like what Castro's doing down there, but it's not The United States job to dictate what kind of governments other countries have. And they said, well, as soon as they land, there's gonna be a a big revolution.
Everybody's gonna rise up and they're gonna overthrow Castro. And he said, well, you can't use the US military. And they ended up bringing those guys over. And in the middle of it in the night, they came to him and said they're getting wiped out on the beach, and you need to send in the military and invade. And he said, we're not gonna do it.
He stepped out of that meeting, and he realized they had been lying to him and trying to trick him. And he said, I wanna take the CIA and shatter it into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds. For the next a thousand days of his presidency, he was at war with his military and intelligence apparatus. They tried to get him to go into Laos. He said, no.
They tried to get him to go into Vietnam. They said, we we need 250,000 combat troops. He refused. Everybody around him want him to go into Vietnam. He sent 16,000 military advisers, and they were allowed to fight.
Many of them did. They both violate the rules of engagement. In October of nineteen sixty three, he heard some of his Green Berets have been killed over there. And he said, I want a total casualty list from Vietnam. His aide came to him and said, seventy five Americans died.
He said, that's too many. And he signed that day a national security order ordering all troops out of Vietnam, US troops. And then a week a month later, he was killed.
@_uwomy - Trump Girl ๐บ๐ธ
One of those killed an American....... https://t.co/RE8OYeVhfN
Video Transcript AI Summary
The fact that they didn't know the answers about Obama tells you everything you need to know. How many illegal immigrants did Barack Obama deport in his eight years as president? I don't know. Have a guess. No clue. Oh, I don't know. It's over 3,000,000. And he was known as deporter in chief by Mexicans. Yes. And that was more than Trump He deported way more than Trump. He deported way more pro rata than any president in history. Who dropped the most bombs in a calendar year in American history? Oh, heck. Come on. President Barack Obama. Right? Including drone programs and so on. What is still open today? Guantanamo Bay? Correct. I know that the general thing is Obama, angel, Trump, devil. Right. But if you actually apply the scrutiny that we give Trump put it this way, if Trump had deported 3,000,000 people, you think you guys wouldn't know that answer? Of course, you would.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The fact that they didn't know the answers about Obama tells you everything you need to know. How many illegal immigrants did Barack Obama deport in his eight years as president? I don't know. Have a guess. No clue.
No clue? Mm-mm. Interesting. Right? Mhmm.
You don't know? I mean, I know it was a lot, but I don't know the exact number. Have a guess. Oh, I don't know. It's over 3,000,000.
And he was known as deporter in chief by Mexicans. Yes. And that was more than Trump He deported way more than Trump. He deported way more pro rata than any president in history. Who dropped the most bombs in a calendar year in American history?
Oh, heck. Come on. President Barack Obama. Barack Obama. Yeah.
Right? Including drone programs and so on. Right? Who got elected in 08/00/2009 on shutting down Guantanamo Bay? Because as a former lawyer, he believed it was an illegal institution for Barack Obama.
What is still open today? Guantanamo Bay? Correct. Right? Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
I know that the general thing is Obama, angel, Trump, devil. Right. But if you actually apply the scrutiny that we give Trump put it this way, if Trump had deported 3,000,000 people, you think you guys wouldn't know that answer? Of course, you would.
@constantin_t - Constantin Ungureanu
@jacksonhinklle @xGABRIELxEUGENx Yup this is the main reason why they killed him ๐๐ป https://t.co/sG7Wo1lwHH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel and if he even knows the verse. "Genesis twelve three" is cited, seen as off-putting when viewed against the New Testament. "The new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant. The new flesh is everybody's." The dialogue moves to religious identity: "Are you Catholic?" "Converting to Catholic from This is my next step," and "ethnically Jewish." Concerns about APAC are voiced: "I'm told that, by some people Mhmm. That if I criticize AIPAC, I'm anti Semitic." "I think it's ridiculous." They discuss whether APAC represents "a kind of cutting in line of prioritization away from the American people," and affirm "100%," noting we vote, but "a separate group gets higher priority because of whatever reasons."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many of you guys think when a lawmaker and a man I respect like Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel, doesn't even know the verse, do you guys think that's like not the best way to approach this? Raise your hand. Okay.
Speaker 1: I think Ted Cruz's Genesis twelve three, I think a lot of people see that as off putting when you look at the New Testament. Why? Because I think a lot of people, they they look especially at the writings of Paul where he talks about how the the new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant. The new flesh is everybody's. Everyone's talking
Speaker 0: about Romans nine?
Speaker 1: Yes. Nine eleven. 11. Six. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Are you Catholic?
Speaker 1: Converting to Catholic from This is my next step.
Speaker 0: Oh, from Judaism? Yes. Oh, wow. So so you're Jew you're ethnically Jewish. Ethnically Jewish.
Yes. And you have concerns about APAC.
Speaker 1: Yes, I do.
Speaker 0: I'm told that, by some people Mhmm. That if I criticize AIPAC, I'm anti Semitic.
Speaker 1: I think it's ridiculous. Yeah. I I feel like it's great to have a concern for your country.
Speaker 0: Do you think that the that AIPAC represents, again, I'm not saying I believe this, but I think this is what you're saying, that it represents a kind of cutting in line of prioritization away from the American people. Yes. Would you guys say that's a fair summary?
Speaker 1: 100%.
Speaker 0: Meaning that, like, okay, we vote, we're citizens, but a separate group gets higher priority because of whatever reasons.