reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
.@elonmusk: "If that means we lose advertising dollars, we lose it. But freedom of speech is paramount."
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe in the freedom of speech, even if it means losing advertising dollars. It's acceptable to choose where your ads appear on Twitter, but it's not acceptable to dictate what Twitter will do.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's totally cool to say that you wanna have your advertising appear in certain places in Twitter and not in other places, but it is not cool to to to try to say what Twitter will do. And if that means losing advertising dollars, we lose it. But freedom of speech is paramount.
@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante
Twitter / X CEO Linda Yaccarino: "We've introduced a new policy called Freedom of speech, not reach" "If you're going to post something that is lawful but is awful, you get labeled. You get deamplified which means it cannot be shared. And it is certainly demonetized"
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have developed brand safety and content moderation tools after acquisitions. Our new policy, "freedom of speech, not reach," addresses hate speech. Illegal or against the law content results in zero tolerance. However, if something lawful but awful is posted, it gets labeled, de-amplified, and demonetized. This ensures brand safety. Once a post is labeled and cannot be shared, users often remove it themselves, as seen in 30% of cases.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Since acquisitions, we have built brand safety and content moderation tools that have never existed before at this company, and we've introduced a new policy to your specific point about hate speech called freedom of speech, not reach. So if you're going to post something that's illegal or against the law, you're gone zero tolerance. But more importantly, if you're going to post something that is lawful but it's awful, you get labeled. You get labeled. You get de amplified, which means it cannot be shared, and it is certainly demonetized back to your direct point about brand brand safety.
So they are protect it from the risk of being next to that content. And it's also why, it's really important to note that once a post is labeled and it can't be shared and the user sees that, 30% of the time, they take it down themselves. Staggeringly, they take it down.
@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2
La liberté d'expression selon @elonmusk
@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸
This man calls for a global purge of all white people and it isn’t considered hate speech and wasn’t removed until public pressure
Video Transcript AI Summary
I express extreme frustration and anger towards white individuals, suggesting that they should all perish. I advocate for a global elimination of their genetic presence, using any means necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I really had enough of his whole life, so I'm a just go ahead and say it. Fuck every white man, woman, and child alive on this planet. All you motherfuckers need to die. All you do. We need to go for a global recessive genetic purge by any means necessary.
reSee.it AI Summary
Our global policy at X Corp is to uphold freedom of speech within legal boundaries. Any employee not aligned with this principle is encouraged to explore opportunities at other social media companies compromising their values for profit.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
At the risk of stating the obvious, I don’t know what’s going on with every part of this platform all the time, but our policy worldwide is to fight for maximum freedom of speech under the law. Anyone working for X Corp who does not operate according to this principle will be invited to further their career at any one of the other social media companies who sell their soul for a buck.
@xDaily - X News Daily
NEWS: X is complying with more German requests compared to pre-acquisition when it comes to identifying users in Hate speech cases, German prosecutors say. This has raised concerns among civil liberties advocates, due to the strict and broad nature of Germany's hate speech laws.
@__An6el__ - S I N E
Proof that X app is censoring and censoring freedom of speech!! https://t.co/d31KVnuz3k
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the incompetence of a certain system and suggests adding more categories to the library system. They mention the word "exclusive" and its growing prominence. They also mention Supreme Court cases from 2003 to 2005, which led to reforms related to sex laws. The speaker briefly mentions the entertainment value of these cases. They mention the emergence of gay marriage in 2005 and the sale of JD Power and Associates to McGraw Hill. The speaker then mentions various events that occurred until January 25, 2010.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Therefore rendering it incompetent. And you should be 4
Speaker 1: more categories to the library system further separating the decimals and the information from the public.
Speaker 0: Invite to cars.
Speaker 1: The word exclusive pop out.
Speaker 0: Watch the magic.
Speaker 1: Which has grown much to prominence and recognition
Speaker 0: over this time frame seriously gone.
Speaker 1: Becoming quite a word that's been used.
Speaker 0: You're right to go, huss.
Speaker 1: Any case, Watching 2003, 2004, 2005. Gone. Couple of more Supreme Court cases went forward because of, going back over all the laws of cases. And I remember them well. It was concerning, reform of Gotcha.
You know, what was it? Prosecutable biophanes because of this. Which built around sex laws. So cute? Isn't it just entertaining?
Gay marriage became a thing. 2005, the JD Power and Associates that I knew sold out to McGraw Hill, S&P Bull, 500. Since then
Speaker 0: Parker?
Speaker 1: Since then, I've watched a range of things take place such as this to 2010. January 25, 2010,
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
The Irish government colluded with big tech companies to censor coverage of the recent riots in Dublin. X is the only company that refused to comply. https://t.co/52NcHu9NXv
Video Transcript AI Summary
A detective in Pierce Street spoke to me about their active engagement with social media companies, specifically TikTok, Meta (formerly Facebook and Instagram), and Twitter. They mentioned that TikTok and Meta were responsive and took down offensive posts, while X (unspecified company) did not fulfill their own community standards. This lack of responsibility led to the establishment of a commission to hold these companies accountable. Rest assured, the Gardai (Irish police) were fully involved and engaged with the situation, directly communicating with the social media companies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I spoke to a detective, in Pierce Street on Saturday who was actively engaged with the social media companies throughout Thursday, who was actively engaged with TikTok, actively engaged with MASA, so Instagram and Facebook, who was actively engaged with Twitter or X. She said very clearly that social media companies, in particular TikTok and Meta, they were responding, they were engaging with Gardie, and they were taking down these vile posts as they came up. X were not, they didn't engage, they did not fulfill their own community standards, And that is why we are moving to a situation where these companies do not get to self monitor. That's why commission demand has been established to make sure that these companies are held responsible because while some were responsible, others were not. So let me reassure you, Gardai were seized of this.
They were engaging. They were engaging directly with the social media companies
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been banned multiple times for using the phrase "It never happened" on my page. It seems like there's a group of people that can't be talked about on this app. The truth is being suppressed in the "public square."
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
🚨Freedom of speech, BUT NOT ABOUT THAT!!!!!🚨 X just went through my page and banned ~every single time~ I hash-tagged the words “It never happened.” If I didn’t know any better I’d think there’s only one group of people you aren’t allowed to talk about on this app. https://t.co/Z5Zv8DOrkZ
@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson
They want you posting Hitler memes https://t.co/XnNEBMk5yX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zionism relies on antisemitism for support, with organizations like the Anti Defamation League inflating incidents to stay relevant. Israel fuels antisemitism, creating a hostile environment for Muslims, Christians, and even Jews who just want to live normally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Zionism thrives off of antisemitism. Zionist organizations rely on antisemitism to pay their bills. Look at the Anti Defamation League. Without antisemitism, which they constantly inflate to the point where over 50% of their documented antisemitic incidents since October 7th are simply pro Palestine rallies, peace rallies, it's pretty obvious that they need antisemitism to exist. And so Israel is actually an engine of antisemitism.
So so I see Zionism as a kind of cult that is not only hostile to Muslims and Christians that live within its realm, but to Jews who live across the world and want to just be normal Jews here.
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
Wow. Look at how Facebook suppresses speech:
@oaxa - OaXa🛩 Pilot🕺 SwingDancer 🕉 Meditator
@sheislaurenlee and when I tried to post on Facebook https://t.co/vXfVoQa5LT
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
Kamala: I will direct the DOJ to censor "misinformation and hate" online https://t.co/EmH6MKaV1d
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Justice will be put back in the business of justice, and the civil rights division will be doubled. Law enforcement will be directed to counter extremism. Social media platforms will be held accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. Social media platforms will be held accountable as a community if they profit off of hate, act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, or don't police their platforms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we'll put the Department of Justice of the United States back in the business of justice. We will double the civil rights division and direct law enforcement to counter this extremism. We will hold social media platforms accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. And if you profit off of hate, if you act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, if you don't police your platforms, we are going to hold you accountable as a community.
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
Oh. My. God. She will shut down @X “We will direct Law Enforcement to counter this extremism. We will hold Social Media Platforms accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms…because they have a responsibility to our Democracy…”https://t.co/fJ7EiAKheW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Justice will be put back in the business of justice, and the civil rights division will be doubled. Law enforcement will be directed to counter extremism. Social media platforms will be held accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. Social media platforms will be held accountable as a community if they profit off of hate, act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, or don't police their platforms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we'll put the Department of Justice of the United States back in the business of justice. We will double the civil rights division and direct law enforcement to counter this extremism. We will hold social media platforms accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. And if you profit off of hate, if you act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, if you don't police your platforms, we are going to hold you accountable as a community.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Meta is censoring posts of a Donald Trump event on IG, claiming that they are promoting dangerous individuals or organizations. If this isn’t election interference, I don’t know what is. https://t.co/ejneszoYeJ
@cb_doge - DogeDesigner
"There’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech." - Democratic Vice Presidential Candidate https://t.co/wBLwNdjFFk
@piersmorgan - Piers Morgan
This is hilarious.. @instagram has taken down my congratulations pic/msg to @realDonaldTrump on the grounds that it’s ’hate speech.’ https://t.co/m0V8GkDWH2
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
This was too hateful and offensive for TikTok https://t.co/B4MC5zuYCL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Have you heard about the TikTok video that was banned for being too controversial? It emphasizes the importance of girls' and women's equality, advocating for fair competition in sports. It encourages women to stand up for their rights and not be silenced by those who label them as bigots. The message highlights the biological differences between men and women and asserts that women deserve their own spaces in sports and life. The speaker calls for honesty and bravery in fighting for these rights, urging others to join in this fight. Additionally, there are recent court rulings challenging the Biden administration's changes to Title IX, signaling a need to remain vigilant and vocal about these issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you heard about this latest video that TikTok banned because they found it to be too controversial, too filled with hate, and too offensive?
Speaker 1: Well, if
Speaker 0: you haven't seen it yet, here it is. Brace yourself.
Speaker 1: If you think girls and women's equality matter, stand up. If girls and women's sports matter, and you want your daughters to have the same opportunity you had, stand up. If you know that it isn't fair or safe to allow males to compete in girls sports because it's well obvious. Stand up. Don't be called by people who call you a bigot.
You're not a bigot. Don't let men tell us how to be good girls. Don't let others tell you you just need to be quiet. Sit down. Be nice.
It's not nice to further a lie. It's not mean to believe in women's equality. We deserve our own sports, privacy, fairness, safety. We deserve a chance to compete and win. So don't be nice.
Don't be careful. Be honest. Be brave. Fight for winning. We've come too far to give up now.
And if you agree with that, stand up and stand with us.
Speaker 0: Crazy. Right? Not what you expected. It it's a sign of this insane time that we are living in where something that is undeniably and objectively true, the biological differences between men and women and boys and girls actually exist. There is such a thing as a woman and a girl that is distinct and different from a man or a boy is deemed ban worthy by TikTok.
We have to keep our eyes open to what is going on and continue to lift our voices and not allow them to ban us from seeing this truth and from sharing this truth. There have been a couple of court rulings that have begun to undo
Speaker 1: the Biden administration's destruction of title 9.
Speaker 0: We have to keep building the
@CathAuthority - Catholic Authority
TikTok banned my Bishop Richard Williamson Edit for "hatespeech", so I will post it on X. https://t.co/EJhfByCv1z
reSee.it AI Summary
Internal Meta documents reveal that the Israeli government has been orchestrating censorship of pro-Palestine content, with Israel being the largest source of takedown requests. Meta has complied with 94% of these requests, resulting in around 40 million posts actioned since October 2023. The leaks indicate that Israel submits identical takedown requests, which Meta's AI uses to automate censorship. The leadership at Meta, including individuals with ties to Israeli officials, reinforces this biased approach, targeting critics abroad rather than local dissent.
@ZMTabloid - ZMT
BREAKING: Internal Meta documents reveal the Israeli government "directly orchestrated" censorship of "pro-Palestine" content. Israel is the largest source of takedown requests and Meta complied with 94%. This resulted in ~40M millions posts actioned on since October 2023. 🧵⬇️
@ZMTabloid - ZMT
These leaks show how Israel is effectively gaming Meta's systems. They submit identical, copy pasted takedown requests regardless of the actual content, and Meta complies. Meta's AI is fed this skewed data, leading to more automated censorship.
@ZMTabloid - ZMT
Meta's Integrity (led by Rosen, ex-Unit8200) and Policy (led by Cutler, ex-Netanyahu advisor) form a loop reinforcing biased takedowns. While most countries target local dissent (Brazil: 95%), Israel targets critics abroad (only 1.3% internal).
@ZMTabloid - ZMT
Reporting by @DropSiteNews https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/leaked-data-israeli-censorship-meta
Leaked Data Reveals Massive Israeli Campaign to Remove Pro-Palestine Posts on Facebook and Instagram
A sweeping crackdown on posts on Instagram and Facebook that are critical of Israel—or even vaguely supportive of Palestinians—was directly orchestrated by the government of Israel, according to internal Meta data obtained by Drop Site News.
dropsitenews.com
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
“We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet.” https://t.co/DfmWghxmVr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that the only solution to a problem is the extermination of white people from the planet. The speaker claims that white people are going to kill "us," and therefore, "we" need to solve this problem. The speaker urges listeners to set up their own system, stop "playing," get serious, and not be diverted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the one idea is how we are going to exterminate white people because that, in my estimation, is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem. Now I don't care whether you clap or not, but I'm saying to you that we need to solve this problem because they are going to kill us. And I will leave on that. So we have to just set up our own system and stop playing and get very serious and not be diverted.
@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields
Patriot Front posted this video and had their account deleted If this is the free speech app why isn't Thomas Rousseau allowed free speech? https://t.co/v5amm3JE6R
Video Transcript AI Summary
Patriot Front addresses criticisms, particularly allegations of being a "fed" organization. They defend wearing masks as protection from hostile entities, citing instances of vandalism against members. They claim that media attention disproves the "fed" accusation, arguing the media actively seeks to expose them.
The organization defends its uniform appearance and planned demonstrations, stating they aim to attract attention and spark discussion. They reject the idea of "optics," preferring to present themselves authentically. Patriot Front outlines its views: a nationalist, isolationist, and nativist vision for America, with anti-immigration and pro-family stances.
They address claims of being controlled opposition, particularly regarding Jewish influence, denying any positive stance towards Jews or Judaism. They refute claims of orchestrating events to get members arrested, citing a specific case in Idaho. The speaker emphasizes the importance of marching as a marketing tactic and dismisses criticisms about their appearance and symbols as insubstantial. They advocate for building a broader movement that transcends online subcultures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys need to into optics. Optics, baby. Optics. Optics. Optics.
Optics. Optics. We could play rap music at our demonstration. Feds. Feds.
Feds. He is fed 100%. It's not magic. We plan ahead. Lay Nazis and lay white supremacists.
Jews. Jewish power. Jews. Jews. Jews.
Judaism. We do not want to be normal. Well, this eye contact is for you. Swarmed by an army of Hitler loving psychos. Real white guys never talk.
Feds. Feds. Feds. Feds. Feds.
Someone whose name sounds Mexican says, yeah. Hashtag MAGA. Murder for hire. Human trafficking. Drug dealing.
Counterfeiting currency. Thomas Rousseau must be super sad. White devil. Try harder. So we've decided to compile an analog Twitter so that I may see a bunch of tweets that usually I'm not able to.
Regarding the organization, its practice, we're gonna go through a number of comments from detractors, and we are going to give our honest, genuine, and unscripted response. Let's get into it. So let's start with one. Richard says, patriots don't hide behind masks nor do they magically appear, all wearing the same uniform arriving in vehicles with blanked out license plates, feds. Some patriots may not wear masks, but many of them do.
Wearing masks is a tried and tested practice to, defend people's information against a government which is hostile to that. You can ask people at January 6 or any number of conservative protests around the country if they would have rather worn masks after their families were after their homes were vandalized by antifa. These things have happened to members of the organization. We have every reason to wear masks. We have every reason to hide our identities, not from our supporters, but from the people who want to harm us.
And we don't magically appear wearing the same uniform arriving in vehicles either. It's not magic. We plan ahead. We tell people what to wear. There's nothing magical about a box truck.
In fact, you could rent one yourself. U Haul and Penske are actually businesses that are entirely based on regular people renting their box trucks. It's really quite affordable. And the blanked out license plates he's talking about, that's a single video from Chicago in twenty twenty one or two was allowed because there were no police present. There was Antifa and there are vigilante photographers, but there were no police present.
And frankly, the police in Chicago have bigger things to worry about than a half dozen vehicles with some tape over their license plates for about three minutes flat. Does any of this prove we're feds? No. We have here by Wall Street Silver. If Patriot Front was actually a real organic white supremacy group, the media would be all over this story to expose every member and ruin their lives.
The fact that this is not happening confirms that they are feds. The media is all over Patriot Front, and that's why you know about patriot front. The media does seek people's identities. They do share them, and they do make concerted efforts to disparage them. And the fact that it is happening should confirm that we're not feds to you.
The fact that you don't know more confirms that you are pushing a questionable agenda whenever you come around every month or two to say the same crap. Next up, mister tangible ghost. The message is correct. They have been met with zero opposition. The streets around them are empty where they protest beyond suspicious to him, he says.
Well, the fact of the matter is we have plenty of opposition. You can look at any of our videos where we often highlight it. Sometimes you might see police around us, such as in cases in Washington DC. But the police are there not to protect us from other people or protect other people from us. They're there to partition various groups of differing ideas and opinions so that nobody directly interacts with each other because sometimes in America, politically, that turns violent and cops really don't like the way that looks in Washington DC.
I could provide plenty of examples of opposition hollering at us, opposition trying to attack us, opposition trying to attack our vehicles, or meeting us in person. I'm sure we'll be playing a few of those examples right now. The fact that the streets may be empty in one part or another, that's just how cities work. The fact that it's suspicious to you means that you need to get better suspicions. The upside down American flag is not a good look, says Ezra.
The state of the country is not a good look. The flag is the least of our worries. John says they could at least throw in a few 50 year olds with giant beer bellies to make it remotely believable. I imagine you might be a man, 50 year olds with a, quote, giant beer belly, but the fact of the matter is Patriot Front does not permit members to be giant beer bellied for very long. Members can join the organization and be out of shape, but we work to get them in shape.
Now you might say, why? If you look at videos in the past of the country for four hundred years, it was very normal to see a large group of American men, none of whom had a stomach that stuck out past their toes. The idea that that is some sort of political qualifying factor in the modern day is only emblematic of how far we have declined as men of masculine virtue in demanding standards from our countrymen. It's ridiculous, and I understand what he's saying. You know, normal groups have fat folks in them.
I get that. But we are not trying to be normal because what is normal is not the proper state of things. The organization is aspirational. We want things to get better, so we will not look like the way things are. Mister European revolution.
Thomas here could have dressed more normally. People trusted identity Europa because Nathan D'Amigo was well dressed, normally dressed, normally appearing individual. You guys need to into optics. Optics, baby. Optics.
If they look smart and sound smart, they'll hella win. I would consider myself well dressed. What is normal? If we wanted to be truly normal, we could play rap music at our demonstrations. If we wanted to be truly normal, we could vote for do nothing republicans.
We do not want to be normal. We want to be aspirational. The look of our demonstrations is unusual. It is not normal for hundreds of men to march around in uniform with flags, shields, banners, and drums. That is not normal.
You are correct. It is not intended to be normal. It is intended to attract attention, to be recognizable, to be emblematic, to catch eyes and make people have an opinion, to make people discuss as you are now. I also thirdly, I reject the notion of optics. I reject the label of optics.
Optics is a silly idea that we need to cultivate and manipulate our image so that people are tricked into liking us. I only ever wanna portray who and what and how I am. Optics as an idea of filtering my appearance to appeal to a certain group of people, I'm going to be and I'm gonna have integrity. And if people like me because of that, then they like what I am, not only what I do. Next.
Mister Trad revival operator says, I still have no idea what views, mission statement, political stances, or end goals are. They just show up whenever the media wants to remind us that, lay Nazis and lay white supremacists are still a thing. Well, mister Trad revival. Views, mission statement, political stances, and end goals have all been explained ad nauseam in a great number of videos, podcasts, interviews. I'll give you a brief summary in this message right here.
Is a nationalist activist group. We believe in traditional American forms of government imbued with the lessons of the past several decades to create a nationalist, an isolationist, a nativist form of life in the country. Mission statement. We wanna organize people to change minds, lives, and bodies to accomplish goals and to make the country look more like we like it and less like we don't. Political stances.
Anti immigration. Pro family. Money should not rule the political system and instead the economy should serve the people. We are anti foreign war. The list goes on.
End goals, national republic. We want the American people to be represented in a body of government that is more properly representative of what Americans have known in the past and what we can instill in the future. And the idea we just show up whenever the media wants to remind us that Nazis are still around. We show up very regularly all around the country all the time. The media is responding to us.
We are not responding to the media. Patriot Front is always active. Biden is always talking about racism. The fact that once or twice those things happen on the same day is not hard to believe. We have a, Russian bot, and that's his name.
He's saying marching IRL has no value. Well, the fact that you know we march IRL as opposed to marching in line has value because you know about it. It has value because you're talking about it. Marching does not need to change the world. It does not need to change political policy.
It doesn't even need to change somebody's opinion, even though sometimes it does. It only has to be worth doing, and its chief worth is as a marketing tactic. Its chief worth is to create discussion, to agitate the political discussion in the political sphere, and the fact that everybody knows about due to our marches marches and not primarily due to our other charitable works, which you could say have a greater impact, or our training or our book clubs. People don't broadly know about us due to those other things, which many people would agree are worthwhile endeavors, but they know about us because of our marches. Why?
Because our marches are effective. And as long as they're effective, we're gonna keep doing them. As long as anything we do has the desired result with minimal risk and cost effective methodology, we're gonna keep doing it. Let's see. I'm not gonna attempt to pronounce this gentleman's name.
He finally mentioned the Israel lobby. Until he focuses on the number one issue, that there was a Jewish mafia running America and not just about general stuff like all the useless politician. I will continue to think that is controlled opposition. This guy, I believe, heard one instance where I mentioned the Israel lobby and not the many many many other times that I have. And it's important for honest and valuable discussion online that when you see one thing in particular that one person might have said, don't assume that that is a representation of everything else they ever said or that they have never said anything else like that.
And I think that is the chief mistake which was made here. I do know that there is a large number of Jews in America that are disproportionately represented in positions of power, that steer the government on a number of significant issues, especially foreign policy and immigration, towards more liberal and internationalist position. One of the most notable examples of us talking about Jewish power would be our march in New York at the World Trade Center, where we had a no Zionist in government banner, which was probably 60 feet long. We demonstrated in front of the Wall Street Stock Exchange. If that's not loud enough for you, I'd like to see what you've done that's louder.
And the fact that is controlled opposition, you really need to ask yourself if you're gonna make an accusation that. Controlled by who? Is controlled to make Jews look good? How do we do that? Am I positive on Jews?
No. I'm absolutely not. Do I think Jews are Americans? No. I absolutely do not.
Do I think Judaism is a practice of religion that could work with the patriot front's ideals and morals? No. I do not. How would that work? Other allegations of controlled opposition.
Patriot front exists to make conservatives look bad. How do we do that? By being in good shape, lack of 50 year old beer bellies. Is it because we're violent? Well, we're not.
Is it because we go out and commit crimes? Well, we don't. Is it because we go out and do charitable works? That wouldn't make any These accusations are made more out of someone perhaps having a cultural disinclination towards our appearance or towards the types of person which might be getting involved in patriot front and not a core ideological issue. In many cases, the people who say things like this actually agree with us on almost everything, but online tribalism convinces people that they need to take up sides in matters which there's no purpose to.
Next. The European revolution again. You know, there's weird symbols like the thing on my hat, which is a cockade. It's a ribbon that is hundreds of years old and meant to symbolize loyalty to the nation whose colors it represents. Mine is America.
Most people will see it and not know what the heck it is or why it's there. He wears a hat at all. Make basic one with no symbols at all. Don't wear sunglasses and make sincere eye contact. Well, this eye contact is for you.
You know, the fact of the matter is your hat shouldn't have a ribbon on. Is that your issue with Patriot Front? Is it is that the reason why Patriot Front is not an acceptable organization that my hat has a ribbon? That I wore sunglasses once? These are not substantial critiques.
These are not real protests that somebody should have to an organization which is doing the right thing. None nothing we do is weird in so far as it is all rooted in American history and culture. And the fact that something may be common at one point in our history, but not common right now is an element for our ideology and not against. We need to uphold and continue our cultural traditions as American because that is emblematic of our heritage. If we start deciding that, oh, well, something from our past, well, it's not common now, so it's weird, it's strange, and we shouldn't do it anymore.
I feel like that's seeding ground to the architects of the modern culture. It's neoliberal. It's science. The modern culture is uprooted. The modern culture despises American heritage and the true story of American history.
And because of that, that has allowed America to become what it is now. So again, the obsession with something that we need to be more normal, more presentable. We do not want to be normal. We do not want to be ordinary. We are not ordinary.
We are extraordinary. And anybody who is ordinary among us needs to be aspiring to be better because our worth as a faithful few nationalists amidst a country of tens and tens of millions is very significant, and we should be aspirational. Now plenty people are gonna be plenty normal. Members of the organization are normal. They have jobs, they have families, they have commutes to work, they have hobbies, they have interests.
But the fact of the matter is together when we work as an organization, we can do something which is more than normal. Mister Ryan Dawson says, Patriot Front is crawling with feds. Now he wouldn't be able to provide you a single example of any fed that he claims that we're crawling with for reference. The van full of these easy marks got arrested before they arrived in Idaho because an informant inside the group told on. Now let me clarify this point.
The truck full of activists in Idaho was arrested because somebody called the cops on us and essentially, if you're familiar with the term, swatted us, making outlandish statements to the police which were not substantiated by the police having any visual knowledge of us. Now the police stopped us and decided to arrest and charge us with something before they even saw us. Police officers were confirming the charge that they were thinking about before they opened the door. There could have been anything behind that door. Why were they so confident that we were there to riot?
Based purely on a lacking specifics description from a man on the phone who could have been anyone saying anything. The informant was a man calling the police. There was nobody inside the van. One police officer did give an interview saying, we've got people everywhere. Something like that.
That cop didn't know anything more about Idaho than you do, at least not the arrest. Plenty of confirmation. You can look through the court documents. There's no sealed documents that indicate any sealed indictment or any secret sources. Ridiculous, and it's false.
Again, if you have these allegations, if you have proof, show me who the fed is. I would like to know. The drunk rebuttal to this based on wishful thinking. I'm not gonna expletive on people trying to stop drag queen story hour or there isn't a fed just because they're in shape. Well, sure there are plenty of feds that aren't in shape.
I agree. You shouldn't dog on people who are trying to protest these drag queen events. We've done a dozen more of these such events. If we had informants, FBI agents who were trying to sabotage and entrap us, then why did all of these other protests with different circumstances and locations go just fine? The end result and conclusion has to be that it was a very specific set of circumstances and a very underprepared police force that was very eager to unlawfully arrest people that resulted in the legal cases in Idaho.
Says the group exists as a as a flypaper to gather everyone against drag queens and then get them arrested. That's what COINTELPRO does. So let me walk through this. Patriot Front has existed for seven years, and for the first four or five years of its existence, it does not protest a single drag queen event. And then the feds decide after five years of building up a group doing many other things, it's time to get them all arrested at one of these protests.
And the result is 30 misdemeanor charges, many of which are resolved without convictions on those misdemeanors, and several are dismissed due to a lack of evidence. If the federal government is setting up this case, why was there no evidence to substantiate it? Mister Dawson, show me where the proof was that I was there to commit a single act of violence. I would love to see if you have it because the prosecution sure didn't. Mister Fly Gojo or Goho says, good speech.
I think the organization would better serve by developing a legal infrastructure to defend white people with, I e, a pro white ADL type organization rather than marching in the streets. I'd love to get right on that, but the fact of the matter is you need to understand the logistics and the differences in what you're asked. If I could have the resources and the opportunities available to me right now to create a legal organization that could employ a lot of lawyers and engage in a lot of litigation, that would be great. And I would certainly see about pursuing anything that was productive in that. As Patriot Front grows, it will do more things as opportunities present themselves.
I don't think it's a bad thing what you're suggesting, but you need to understand how organizing works and how resources come into play. And perhaps if you really value this suggestion and there's some actionable steps forward, you should get involved and make it a reality if you wanna see us doing something which we're not doing. Do you not see the parallels between his, my, physiognomy and Fuentes? One of them is an AstroTurf version of the other, presumably I and the astroturf version of Fuentes. I don't know how much detail I can get into this without sounding disrespectful towards the man, so I won't compare our physiognomy.
Physiogamy, not physiognomy. So you don't know. Don't mean to counter signal the guy, presumably me, but he's basically saying that the idea of an American has gone from being an Anglo to being European, and that America serves to facilitate the mixing of European ethnicities into one. Is that true? The organization or America does not serve to facilitate the mixing of European ethnicities into one in Europe.
Europeans from wherever in Europe they may come from that come to America do end up assimilating or should, in any case, assimilate to the American nationality and ethnicity. So in America, that is true. In Europe, it is not. What Europeans decide to do with their ethnicity and their own rules for assimilation is up to them. So Joe, the patriot front, exists to maintain the fake but increasingly popular narrative that white people are inherently racist.
That's why every time I make this point on social media, I'm immediately swarmed by an army of Hitler loving psychos. Anyone viewing this post will see me outnumbered 20 to one and be led to believe that white people really are just a bunch of racists, like the media has been saying. So there's a lot to get into in this comment. First one, I don't know if I've really ever mentioned Hitler in any substantial way in my entire political career, and I don't think it would be apt to label me as psychotic. And when you talk about the number of white people, which you use the term racist, which is a meaningless insult, but the number of white folks or people of European descent who believe that race is a real and countable factor of society and should be recognized as such from the point of view of Americans, of the European race.
The fact that a lot of people believe that might be an inclination that you are in the wrong. It might be an inclination that you need to realize that a color blind view of nationalism or patriotism is not possible. It is internally incongruous. And the fact that the media says people are racist is the media's prerogative. If the media says something bad about me, saying it's my fault is ridiculous.
If people have issues or concerns I say regarding what I say, they need to use what I say as a result of it and not go merely by the media's definitions. If you don't trust the media about anything else, then why would you trust them in regarding patriot front? Someone whose name sounds Mexican says, yep. And our FBI could easily arrest their organizers with RICO charges, but they don't. Because when you get down to it, it's our FBI that's behind them, just like BLM, just like Antifa, and also just like the Patriot Front.
The thing about RICO as a criminal statute, it is very often brought up in a broad and very overbroad piece of rhetoric, almost as a fear mongering tactic. There are a certain number of detailed RICO predicate offenses, which include things like murder for hire, human trafficking, drug dealing, counterfeiting currency, and Patriot Front is not engaged in any of those nor will it ever be. The idea that the government has a catch all way to arrest people based on political affiliation alone, not including any criminal activity or conspiracy thereof, is ridiculous and is a fear mongering tactic likely that the FBI finds very agreeable because it keeps people paranoid and not organized. I can't speak to the validity of BLM as a movement. I know there's a lot of NGOs involved with that.
I cannot speak to the validity of ANTIFA as a movement. I know there's a lot of NGOs and funding that goes there. There are government grants which trickle down into those less leftist movements, but that is because the political left has worked its way through a lot of institutions to become recipient of that kind of institutional support. Nationalists have not done that at the moment to the same scale that a lot of people on the fringes of the left have. And that's why it's important to promote and support nationalist organizations and patriotic movements that are aiming to achieve more popularity, that are aiming to achieve a better allocation of resources to themselves and from the outside of their organization.
Mister Meh, those poor patriot front boy, they're trying so hard for hashtag MAGA to accept them, but they keep getting called feds. Crying emoji. They just want to be alt right so bad. They have uniforms due training, try to march together. Thomas Rousseau must be super sad he's not being accepted.
This comment is based on a number of falsehoods and misconceptions. I don't necessarily want MAGA to accept me for anything. I am going to represent myself and be what I am and say what I believe. If somebody decides to support me for that wherever they are in the political spectrum, I'll be okay with that. But I am not changing anything about what I do or angling anything I say with the specific intent of people in hashtag MAGA to support me.
The fact that people keep calling us feds is actually probably a result of our success. Where certain people are high up in the conservative social media echelons have decided that that is a valuable tactic to use against patriot front, to keep people in their previous frames of mind, and keep them away from coming to certain realizations about America, its history, and nationalism and patriotism as political ideologies. I think our movement has been very successful so far in spite of all the challenges that have been placed against it, and in spite of all the naysayers and detractors such as yourself, of which you are by far not the greatest. Fire harder. Chris Jacob.
He is fed 100%. I know real white guys who were banned, persecuted, and on the run, and their domain seized. Andrew Anglin is one of the real white guys. Search him out. Check out Daily Stormer.
The real white guys never talk. This script, they are too wild. Straight from the heart. If your statement that everybody who has not had a domain name seized by its domain provider is a federal agent, then you can run with that. But it is not a real metric to go by at all.
The fact that white guys who are real and not fake are too wild to write down what they say before they say it is frankly an indictment on your opinion of the white race. And I believe men of European heritage and specifically of the American extraction should be mannered in their forms of speech and conduct in such a way that sometimes they might know what they're saying before they say it, and I try to do so often. A seminal white devil telling white lies as usual, stealing racial identities and heritage. American is a term meant for the aboriginal races of people throughout The Americas. At this point, I don't think you can pay whitey to tell the truth about American history.
Well, that's interesting. Because if American as a term is meant for the aboriginal races, as you say, then I would love to see any historical examples of the term American being applied before Europeans arrived in the New World, which it wasn't. America and American as a national identity is a result of European colonization, expansion, and conquered. I do not want to steal any racial identities. I want to maintain my own and acknowledge that it exists and has existed as a vital part of the history of my nation.
I am telling the truth about America. The fact that that truth may not paint your people in the best of light isn't my problem. I've already responded to that guy. I agree with the message, says mister Forbes, but not the marching. The goal should be to cause the left to overextend, gaining the more moral appearance of defense.
Then have at it, not to put yourselves in an overextension prematurely. Now mister Forbes probably only knows about our message because of the marching, again proving that there is a purpose and a reward to the demonstration. If we need to have the left overextend to prosecute us, then we've already done it. There have been false cases used against Patriot Front. My case in Idaho was dismissed because there was not the predicate evidence to prosecute.
Various other false cases have been alleged against Patriot Front members and a cause that Patriot Front represents, and they have fallen flat. Many attempts by the media and anarchists to infiltrate or slander the organization have been tried and have failed. That is not an example of overextension. For the opponents to try something which is not successful, then I don't know what is. And I won't even aim to interpret what you mean by and then have at it because I try not to use coded language.
So that's everything. And I hope some of these responses were informative or elucidating for some of the people that might have their concerns about the organization. But trust genuinely that there's a lot of people out there, especially on Twitter or X that want to spread misinformation and lies, not just about patriot front, but about a great number of things to instill a culture of paranoia, to instill a culture of distrust. And also, there are a great number of people in the so called movement that really want to stay in a very specific niche of political activity, and they might feel threatened or uncomfortable by things that are outside of that niche. And I understand that.
But what we need as a movement for sovereignty is we need to build up organizations and movements that cross over all these various preferences and niches to create something which can truly contain an entire lifestyle and a way of life additionally. A community or a link of many communities around the country is what's needed, and you're not going to be able to do that if you're too particular about an online subculture. I understand why a lot of people are involved in those sorts of things, but you need to broaden your perspective. Anyways, I hope this has been educating. I hope this has been instructive.
We may do it again sometime.
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast News
Hillary Clinton: "If social media doesn’t moderate content, then we lose total control." https://t.co/s586f3qsrk
Video Transcript AI Summary
If social media platforms do not moderate and monitor content, we lose total control. This loss of control results in real harm, beyond just social and psychological effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If the platforms whether it's Facebook or Twitter X or Instagram or TikTok whatever they are, if they don't moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control, and it's not just the social and psychological effects, it's real harm.
reSee.it AI Summary
I read the EU unveiled its “European Democracy Shield,” a continent-wide grid to block disinformation and foreign meddling. A Centre for Democratic Resilience targets hybrid threats, boosts election security, and fortifies media—cybersecurity, civic training, and PR. Von der Leyen says it protects free speech and independent media; critics fear state-approved truth. It could be a firewall or a filter, depending who holds the password.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🇪🇺 EUROPE BUILDS A “DEMOCRACY SHIELD” - DIGITAL IRON DOME FOR (WHAT THEY CALL) TRUTH The EU just went full cyber-paladin. Brussels unveiled its “European Democracy Shield”, a continent-wide defense grid designed to block disinformation, foreign meddling, and information warfare - basically, a NATO for facts. The plan sets up a Centre for Democratic Resilience to target hybrid threats from regimes like Russia, boost election security, and fortify the media against propaganda floods. It’s a mix of cybersecurity, civic training, and political PR - all dressed in the language of resilience and values. Ursula von der Leyen framed it as protecting “free speech, independent media, and institutions” - but critics are already whispering that the EU’s cure for fake news might look suspiciously like state-approved truth. Europe’s democracy shield could be a firewall - or a filter. The difference will depend on who’s holding the password. Source: European Commission
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🇪🇺 EUROPE’S DEMOCRACY ISN’T DYING - IT’S BEING FIREWALLED IN REAL TIME Across the EU and UK, “freedom” is being redefined, quietly, and from the top down. The EU just rolled out the Democracy Shield, claiming it’ll defend against election interference. Reality? It gives Brussels cover to police narratives they don’t like, especially as right-wing parties gain ground. In the UK, the new Freedom of Speech Act promises to protect campus debate, while the government uses counter-terror software to flag critics of asylum policy online. Romania froze its own election. France banned Le Pen. Germany’s investigating AfD, right as it tops the polls. This isn’t about stopping extremism. It’s about stopping opposition. The mask is off. “Liberal democracy” now comes with a firewall. Sources: Magyar Nemzet, The Telegraph, EU Commission, The Economist, @FilosofiaPolti
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
Identity politics, deplatforming and ritual denunciation? No thanks. That’s what we voted against. https://t.co/Yf5UAfyb1j