reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV
Justin Trudeau continues his campaign of lies, hypocrisy & trying to mask his tyranny... @jordanbpeterson @thevivafrei @PierrePoilievre @ezralevant
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the risks of fear and anger, emphasizing the importance of vaccination and the negative impact of a small fringe minority. Speaker 2 highlights the potential consequences of shutting borders on goods. Speaker 1 emphasizes the diversity of Canadians and their shared identity. Speaker 3 mentions democratic values and Speaker 4 announces new measures allowing financial service providers to freeze accounts. Speaker 0 mentions efforts to reduce emissions in the oil and gas sector and Canada's commitment to treating people with respect. Speaker 3 expresses support for human rights and the right to protest. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 expressing shock over a lady being trampled.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do we go down a path of fear and anger? Don't think you can get on
Speaker 1: a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk.
Speaker 0: A division of those people are putting us all at risk. And toxicity. Small fringe minority of people who are on their way to Ottawa. Fear they will put food on anyone's table.
Speaker 2: And if Canada, in effect, Shuts its borders to a high proportion of those drivers. Surely, that that's a bit shooting himself in the foot, particularly when it comes to goods on shelves.
Speaker 0: It is. Anger doesn't create a single job. Mandatory vaccination for federal employees are some of the strongest in the world. When we hosted chancellor Scholz of Germany, he talked at length about our values of compassion And diversity.
Speaker 1: I mean, even if you're to pan the camera around right now, you'll see every kind of looking person. You'll see there's probably 30 languages spoken right here. There's every kind of person here. We're all Canadians.
Speaker 3: They know
Speaker 0: That we have the democratic values that make us rely reliable.
Speaker 4: As of today, a bank or other financial service provider We'll be able to immediately freeze or suspend an account without a court order.
Speaker 0: We have great resources And even greater workers will cap oil and gas sector emissions today and ensure they decrease Tomorrow at a pace and scale needed to reach net zero by 2050. That's no small task For a major oil and gas producing country. But what ties this all together, what makes Canada really valuable Is we treat people with the respect and dignity they deserve.
Speaker 1: They just trampled that lady. They just fully trampled
Speaker 3: that lady. Obviously, everyone in China should be allowed to express themselves, I should be allowed to, you know, share their, their perspectives, and indeed protest. We're gonna continue, to ensure, that China knows we'll Stand up for human rights. We stand, with people who are expressing themselves.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The lady got fully trampled with a horse. What the fuck is
@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV
Previous viral Trudeau lying clip👇👇 https://t.co/EfSPgv3WzG
@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger
Justin Trudeau says he's deeply compassionate, but he's not. He smeared ordinary Canadians as Nazis. He froze the bank accounts of critics of his Covid policies. And he spread disinfo while demanding censorship. It's time to talk about the malignant narcissism of Justin Trudeau.
reSee.it AI Summary
I witnessed a series of posts discussing a PR incident involving Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, a fired PR person. She was pranked by Russian pranksters and made controversial statements comparing Russians to Mongol hordes. There were also discussions about advocating extreme measures, including terrorism, against Russian journalists. The posts also touched on corruption in Ukraine and the expectations for President Zelensky's actions on the global stage.
@DD_Geopolitics - DD Geopolitics
Another bad moment for Ukrainian PR, from a recently fired PR person. Sarah Ashton-Cirillo was recently pranked by Russian pranksters Vovan&Lexus Ashton-Cirillo doubles down on statements that Russians are not human, comparing them to Mongol hordes. Advocates to use any means (including DRG's a.k.a. terrorism) to target Russian journalists... Talks about bad corruption in Ukraine and how Zelensky should act on the world stage
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 was fired and reinstated due to political reasons, affecting his testimony against a Russian agent. The decision came from high levels, possibly New York. Both speakers discussed corruption, equipment issues, and the need for change in the army. Speaker 1 expressed interest in transferring to Speaker 0's artillery unit. They also discussed foreign fighters, security risks, and the murder of an English soldier. Speaker 0 proposed Speaker 1 become a deputy in upcoming elections. They ended on a positive note, expressing gratitude and respect.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How they dare that? How how it could happen? I was, I was in a trip, but, when I get this the that news, it was terrible. I I think it's it is not fair. It is it is extremely it is extremely bad for our reputation to do that.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. It was political as you very well understand politics. I made the statement that Russian propagandists will be hunted down, and I refuse to apologize for that statement. And what's not being said is that I was the expert witness in a case against a Russian agent in Kharkiv. And so by knocking me out of this position, it made my testimony less effective.
So on so you know the process. On Tuesday morning, sir, I was fired. At 10 o'clock on Tuesday, I was re reinstated. By Tuesday night, I received the analytics report. The investigation was already done, and I was cleared.
On Wednesday morning, sir, I was told that the ministry was completely defending me. On Wednesday afternoon, an email was sent to an American politician regarding me, from a official email address of of the government stating that I was already cleared. And then, sir, 2 hours later, the message appears that I was suspended.
Speaker 0: But but but who was who was the the person who ordered to do that?
Speaker 1: I was told, sir, that it, came from the highest levels. That's all I was told. And general Tansura was the one who decided on the suspension and the language of the suspension.
Speaker 0: When you're talking about high level, what is the what is the person?
Speaker 1: I was told that it came from New York, sir, on the trip that, the government is on currently.
Speaker 0: Oh, my gut. It's it's it's so so Ministry of Defense of Ukraine tried to to to help you, to defend you, but someone from the New York decided to
Speaker 1: do that.
Speaker 0: Oh my god. That is it is so pity.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. I think I was told that they had to make a big deal and to shut me up in order to possibly get help. So that's why I understand it. I understand it's political. I'm still in the army.
I'm still speaking to several high level officers doing my other work, just not a spokesperson. But, sir, I don't want to serve in I would like to transfer to army. I don't want to serve in territorial defense forces anymore. I have a very strong record of service, and I had an idea. You're a very strong man, a very public man, and you and I had discussed your daughter.
What if I was able to be transferred to your artillery unit along with your child, and I could sort of work in capacity of, sergeant for you? I have thought at the front lines, not in artillery, but as infantry.
Speaker 0: Think we can, change all things that already cost our army. And my I have many I have many complaints regarding regarding, current government. You know, I can't say it public, but I can say it in a private conversations. And you see what is, what is going on with corruption now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's terrible. Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: It's terrible. It's also because because of, that officials try to earn some money from, from equipment that were provided by, the United States, and it just goes to it is, it is really big,
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. Anybody who is willing to look at the situation seriously understands we have significant issues when it and if we don't change these issues within the next 6 months, we're going to have a 30 year war, sir. So I believe it was truly political because the Republicans are trying to use the case of Gonzalo Lyra, the Russian agent that I or asset that I testified against as to try to say we don't like free speech. I do believe that they were very angry in Washington that I was I was being talked about with Gonzalo Lyra that the 2 Americans were being discussed. And they were told, make it go away, especially because Sarah will not apologize.
Because I made it clear, sir, Russian propagandists will be hunted down. I don't care if they arrest me for
Speaker 0: It's clearly cumulating us.
Speaker 1: Yes. We it looks like we gave in to the Russians. That's the part that was in incredible.
Speaker 0: Okay, Sarah. The the bad the bad news is, about our counter offensive, and you know what is going on on the foreign stage. And I see that now we have great problems with equipment. We have great problems with soldiers now. So I can't I can't bear it anymore.
And if it will be elections, we have to change the situation extremely. Even we will not we have some troubles with the with the people, with with our human resources. So the problem with corruption is also high. The problem with, our financial debts is also high. So no one is trying to to no one is trying to resolve these problems.
Many people are trying to, just to make a great image of them. Say, trying to to help their reputation, especially in politics area. So it is set.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. They're trying to profit off of the blood of our lost soldiers. They're trying to profit off the blood of the men and women who are losing arms and legs. Because if we are making promises and not being realistic, our partners can't trust us in negotiations, and our partners can't trust our projection for what's going to happen in the future because all they can judge us on are the results. And that's one of the problems is that the messaging that we have coming out is truly fantastic.
It's almost fantastic messaging. And that's good for fighting the Russians. It's not good when we're using this in discussions with our partners in Washington, our partners in Brussels, and our partners in, especially, the Eastern European nations, sir.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And I I really disappointed by our president now.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. It's it's been 19 months of this. It's not about theater anymore. Theater was important in the 1st days weeks. It's not about populism, sir.
It's not about populism on the world stage.
Speaker 0: Did you hear about the case with, with, English, soldier who was killed by his, his partner. So what do you think about it?
Speaker 1: I think that we have a lot of foreign fighters, sir. As I said about your daughter when you were asking about putting within English speaking group or an international group, I think we have a terrible problem with most foreign fighters here because they are just a step above mercenaries, and they come here because all they know is warfare. And while I defend them in public, in private, I know many of them have very far right leanings. So there's some Nazi groups, and I reported this. I also know that many of them are doing this because they have no lives outside of, their outside of in their own countries.
And so we have security risks. And more importantly, we have morale and psychological issues because foreign soldiers are here for the money, most of them. Most of them. And those people are going to be the ones that are willing to engage in drugs, willing to engage in, fundraising where they're putting the money in their own pockets. And it's something we have to be very careful about.
It did not surprise me, sir, that somebody was murdered. Unfortunately, what surprises me is that we're still allowing this to happen 19 months after the full scale invasion began. And these issues with foreigners, these issues with corruptions, these issues with the fighting within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, it takes away the focus from, as you said, the war and, more importantly, from the people of Ukraine.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And I I have I have seen the some, some, episodes from the Russian show with Maria Butina. So it was, funny to look at it, how they're trying to, to do how to train to harm harm you. It's, it's bit
Speaker 1: for me, I wear it as a badge of honor because, ultimately, when I signed my oath so I'm loyal to my country, the United States. But when I gave my oath to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, I I think she was a a terrible spy. I think she was a step above a whore, and, ultimately, she was rewarded as a Duma member. And this is Maria Butina is the reason, sir, that we know the Douma can never be taken seriously.
Speaker 0: I can also propose you some, something. As you know, if it will be election soon, I can propose you to take a part as a deputy on the next level, but it is like a conversations chat now. Of course, we need to sir.
Speaker 1: And I would be honored, sir. I can say with no question, sir. I would be honored because your platform is 1. That's a platform about the future. Thank you, commander.
Thank you, mister president.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Thank you for your proposals, and, let's be in touch. Have a great day.
Speaker 1: Sir. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Here I am, Slava, sir.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Pierre Poilievre schools a dumb journalist. https://t.co/rr9rQRgOze
Video Transcript AI Summary
Paola Lorigio from The Canadian Press questions the speaker's decision to label the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge as terrorism, despite no official confirmation. The speaker defends their statement, citing media reports and claiming that the government of Canada presumed it to be a terror-related event. They also criticize The Canadian Press for issuing three corrections in one article. When asked if they think CTV was irresponsible for reporting the incident as terrorism, the speaker redirects the question. The conversation ends with the speaker pointing out the contradiction in the reporter's comment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, Paola Lorigio with The Canadian Press. Do you think it was responsible for you to call yesterday's explosion by the customs by the checkpoint at the Rainbow Bridge terrorism when no U. S. Or Canadian officials said that was like, authority said that was the case and when the New York governor also said there was no evidence to suggest terrorism activity?
Speaker 1: Actually, you're wrong. Are you a CP? Okay. So CP by the way, CP, just for everyone's knowledge, did have to make 3 corrections for falsehoods That they put into a single article. I think that might be unprecedented.
I'm actually thinking about checking with the Guinness Book of World Records to see If there's ever been a news agency that has had to issue 3 corrections for patent falsehoods that they admit They had been made in 1 single article. And now you've made yet another falsehood in your question. Where you are wrong Is that CTV reported that the government of Canada was presuming that the incident was terrorist. So yeah. That was and that's what I said in my remarks.
You're right. It was a media report.
Speaker 0: But it's citing media reports and not.
Speaker 1: Which is what I said. In the house, I said there are media reports.
Speaker 0: And you think that's a responsible thing to go on to make that that kind of a a statement at the time without speaking
Speaker 1: What kind of statement? I didn't. I said there were media reports.
Speaker 0: That's the distinction we're making? Okay.
Speaker 1: No. There's no distinction. What I said, and I was right, was that there were media reports of a terror related event. By your admission, there were media reports of a terror related event. And that media report, According to CTV, unless you're questioning their integrity now, came from security officials in the Trudeau government.
So do you think the CTV was irresponsible in putting out that tweet?
Speaker 0: Do you think it was responsible for coming to making the House Do
Speaker 1: do sorry. I'm asking. I I have already answered that. Do you do you think CTV was irresponsible to put that tweet out?
Speaker 0: That's none of my business. That's not for me to comment.
Speaker 1: Well, you just did comment.
Speaker 0: Okay.
@Jenni_Byrne - Jenni Byrne
Any wonder why the press gallery has been in full on attack mode against Pierre since Trudeau’s Fall Update? He’s giving out another $30,000 per journalist in tax-funded media bailouts. Expect them to do whatever the PMO says. https://t.co/KOGp4JlZcD
@StaceyMonette27 - Stacey
Trudeau’s new Executive Director of Communications is a supporter of medical choice discrimination, coercion, misinformation, propaganda & accuses people of being child killers for not complying. 👇🏼👇🏼 #cdnpoli https://t.co/x5TNKPl83o
@Panopticonomy - Laura Love
Here's my fav where he's talking about "gives amazine head" on a public platform to explain why someone wins an entertainment award. Gross🤢.. Again, nice "fix it" hire for your "communications" and rebranding you did there @telfordk @JustinTrudeau 😆 Carry on, this will be fairly amusing.
reSee.it AI Summary
Justin Trudeau's decision to involve politicians suspected of having strong ties to China in the Foreign Interference inquiry raises concerns. It seems counterproductive and leaves us wondering what our allies think. Furthermore, the Minister of Spending, Chrystia Freeland, claiming that the government is "protecting" CSIS is audacious. Canada needs protection, but from politicians who prioritize foreign nations over our own. Trudeau, Hannaford, Freeland, and others must prioritize our country's interests.
@Panopticonomy - Laura Love
So, you @JustinTrudeau gave standing in the Foreign Interference inquiry via Marie-Josée Hogue to politicians who CSIS has said they suspect are strongly PRC affiliated!? Seems counterproductive. What do our allies think of such odd circumstances and activities? Then your Minister of Spending, the DPM @cafreeland has the nerve to post just last night that your government is "protecting" @csiscanada? 😂 Notes: Canada needs protecting, for sure, but it needs it to be protected from Trudeau, Hannaford, Freeland, Mary Ng, Senator Woo+Ho+Harder, Han Dong, Michael Chan and any politician or staff that favour and strategically work for foreign nations over OURS.
@7Trg6 - 7LOV.vs.TRG6
Markham Deputy Mayor Michael Chan granted full standing in the first phase of hearings on foreign interference in the 2019 & 2021 elections It includes the power to cross-examine witnesses & gain access to all evidence collected & presented to the inquiry outside of hearings https://t.co/QWVx2O9t4R
@NyaPfanner - Nya Pfannerstill
More accurately, one Ministry of the Trudeau Govt spent $680,000 on propaganda. There are 39 Ministries https://t.co/shDtjC12lr
@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard
Shocker, Liberal's busted again, this time for corrupt covert propaganda assaults on Canadians Shame on these influencers too for selling their souls to the Devil, let's hope a detailed list of these scumbags is released to the public Calling all Whistleblowers
@mindingottawa - Blacklock's Reporter
DOCUMENTS: @GovCanHealth quietly paid $682K to Twitter influencers 'not required to reveal they are gov't paid because that would be embarrassing.' https://www.blacklocks.ca/feds-paid-twitter-stars-682k/ #cdnpoli @mferreriptbokaw
Feds Paid Twitter Stars $682K | Blacklock's Reporter
blacklocks.ca
reSee.it AI Summary
The Canadian government paid $682k to Twitter influencers for Covid-19 vaccine promotion. Many of these accounts lack real influence and some appear to be bots. The Trudeau Liberals' choice of influencers reflects their lack of understanding of the internet.
@jasonjamesbnn - Jason James
The Canadian government paid $682k to "Twitter influencers" as propaganda agents for the Covid-19 vaccines in 2021. Aside from the general grotesqueness of accepting money to propagandize on behalf of your government, none of these accounts belong to anyone of any real influence. Half of them no longer exist, and the half that do exist look like they belong to bots who send random camgirl links to your inbox and try to scam you for prepaid Apple gift cards. I'd be more angry about this if the Trudeau Liberals weren't so hilariously awful at understanding the internet. Judging by their selection of influencers, I am certain our entire government could be taken down by a single email from a Nigerian prince.
@hollyanndoan - Holly Doan
Feds @GovCanHealth paid Twitter “influencers” $682,166 since 2021. Tweeters collected talent fees to post support for federal programs without disclosing they were paid. Names of “influencers” here: https://www.blacklocks.ca/feds-paid-twitter-stars-682k/ #cdnpoli
Feds Paid Twitter Stars $682K | Blacklock's Reporter
blacklocks.ca
@Panopticonomy - Laura Love
So let's start having a wee look into this social media paid influencer scam perpetrated by @CPHO_Canada & her team at @GovCanHealth. Here is a screenshot of blacklocks report wherein some "influencers" are named. Lets start with the first one: "@articmakeup"
@scoopercooper - Sam Cooper
Feds Paid Twitter Stars $682K | Blacklock's Reporter - wouldn’t be too hard for this money to leak into election organizing groundwork when you start throwing it around you make friends https://www.blacklocks.ca/feds-paid-twitter-stars-682k/
Feds Paid Twitter Stars $682K | Blacklock's Reporter
blacklocks.ca
@StaceyMonette27 - Stacey
Trudeau’s new Executive Director of Communications SCRUBBED HIS TWITTER ACCOUNT & blocked half of Canada. 😂 Posts you will no longer find. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 https://t.co/po7RR5wmjA
@therealmrbench - sonofabench
The Trudeau govt is one of scandal and corruption. Employees are being suspended without pay to try to silence those who might say something about leadership in the ArriveCan App scandal. https://t.co/kaPPhQCjHV The Singh NDP is blocking investigation into the "free" $84,000 vacation to Jamaica
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antonio Utano and Cameron McDonald have been suspended without pay in the ArriveCAN scandal. The government is using public servants as scapegoats instead of taking responsibility for the $54 million scandal. Taxpayers are unhappy and want the truth. The ministers need to show leadership and oversight to prevent such scandals. The Public Safety Minister, Minister Duclos, and Minister Anand should come to the Government Operations Committee to explain and take responsibility. This is an opportunity for them to make things right and not leave public servants and taxpayers in a mess. The Minister of Public Safety should start by attending the committee.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is breaking news in The Globe and Mail this morning that you may have already seen. Antonio Utano and Cameron McDonald have been suspended from their positions without pay in the ArriveCAN scandal. What is going on here? What is going on here? We know now in the ArriveCAN scandal that we had A $54,000,000 boondoggle that was handled by 2 individuals working out of their government, but this is a new development now that public servants are now being targeted by their masters that they are being muzzled after coming forward with their testimony in this committee.
No one is happy now. Tax Payers aren't happy now. They're on the hook for this $54,000,000 scandal and instead of taking responsibility, This government is using their employees, public servants, as scapegoats. This has to stop and how it stops is we get the minister at committee right away as soon as possible to share the truth, to share what actually happened in this ArriveCAN scandal because ministers here have a double offense. First of all, they didn't provide the leadership and the oversight so that this ArriveCAN scandal never would have happened.
If there would have been leadership, if there would have been oversight, taxpayers would not have been taken for the $54,000,000 that they were taken for. And secondly, true leaders would take responsibility for this $54,000,000 scandal instead of passing it on to their employees, passing this on to public servants. Now I am first of all asking the Public Safety Minister Come to government operations committee. Show your face. Stand up for these terrible decisions of your subordinates which are resulting in mental health problems, Just complete uncertainty throughout this department.
I'm asking you please to come to Government Operations Committee but I wouldn't stop there. I would send a call out also to Minister Duclos, Minister of Procurement to come back to Government Operations Committee to explain how this error could have happened. Is this a process that happens all the time that will happen again? That taxpayers are taken for more 1,000,000 of dollars because of his lack of oversight. Also Minister Anand needs to come.
Is this the type of public service that she wants where public servants are afraid to speak out to truth as to the process, we need to get to the bottom of this and the only way we're going to do this is if ministers come to the committee starting with the Minister of Public Safety, Dominique LeBlanc. Minister LeBlanc, I'm asking you do the right thing. Your government didn't provide oversight through the ArriveCAN scandal and that's why now we have the 54,000,000 boondoggle and this is only one of many scams across this government. This is your opportunity to come and make it right but also to do the leadership thing to take responsibility for actions that you should have taken responsibility for as a government a long time ago. Don't put your public servants out there to dry when it was your lack of leadership that got everyone Canadian taxpayers and public servants in this mess.
I look forward to seeing these ministers starting with the Minister of Public Safety at public, at the Government Operations Committee.
reSee.it AI Summary
I found tweets from Trudeau's new senior policy adviser, Supriya Dwivedi, engaging with Canada Proud, a conservative group. Her tweets are being deleted. Dwivedi has a background in media. Some criticize Trudeau's choice of advisers, comparing them to himself and his cabinet.
@Brucesdottir - The Unacceptable Marie
Check out the tweets from Trudeau’s new senior policy adviser, Supriya Dwivedi, to Canada Proud, a grassroots conservative group working to defeat the Liberals. (Her tweets are quickly being deleted). She formerly worked in the media. Trudeau sure can pick 'em. Certainly explains the MPs in his cabinet. Quite the collection of reprobates & nutbars. THIS one he's hired as adviser is absolute scum. Much like himself, come to think of it.
@ContrarianTribe - Contrarian
🇨🇦Trudeau’s new advisor says she was defending her use of crude language against “the far right”? So I took the liberty to show Canada who she really is. These are all from her podcast no one watched or cared about. Canada?🤔 https://t.co/jsbmCEwplA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trudeau has hired Supriya Dwivedi, who is known for her outspoken and controversial language. The speaker expresses frustration and a lack of credibility in their own opinions. They emphasize the need to take things seriously and not be ignorant. The speaker also criticizes themselves and others for making mistakes and not progressing. They question why Trudeau hired someone with such vulgar language.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meet Trudeau's newest hire, Supriya Dwivedi. The number 1, like, shut the fuck up. I sort of tapped out. Right? And so I feel like I don't really have much of a leg to stand on.
You wrestle with pigs, you're gonna get covered in shit. You don't take this shit seriously. Be that dumb. You can't be that dumb. Nobody can be that dumb.
You just need to step the fuck up. I also would have them not even taste in my mouth. Shit. Quite frankly bullshit. Shooting ourselves in the dick.
We don't take this shit seriously. To continually fuck up, and we're not gonna fucking get anywhere. Shit. Like, shut the fuck up. Wow, miss Sapria.
I think we've had enough or maybe not. Shit. Shit. So, Justin, tell us why you hired Supriya. The Why did Trudeau hire such a vulgar and vile woman?
@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock
Trudeau's top IT bureaucrat refuses to take responsibility for deleting 1700 emails capturing ArriveCan funding and shady contracting details. But nothing to see here, folks! The Trudeau government doesn't consider such destruction of evidence as criminal. Wow! https://t.co/AyPq60FdBI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks if Mindon is part of the investigation, to which Speaker 1 responds that allegations have been received and the review is ongoing. Speaker 0 then mentions that Mindon has 4 years' worth of relevant emails that have been corrupted, but Speaker 2 questions the validity of this statement. Speaker 0 emphasizes the seriousness of deleting emails and asks when the president and the auditor general were informed. Speaker 1 states that the allegations were received on December 11th, but there is no evidence of deletion. Speaker 0 asks if the auditor general was notified, and Speaker 1 confirms informing them of the allegations. The Treasury Board Secretariat and RCMP were not informed due to lack of evidence of criminality. The conversation ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now on the issue of deleting emails, Mindon. And Mindon, just to clarify, has never been the subject of this particular project, Helios investigation, is that correct?
Speaker 1: As was, published
Speaker 0: He's not part of the investigation?
Speaker 1: If I could answer.
Speaker 0: So I'm asking you, is he part of the investigation or not?
Speaker 1: On December 11th, I received allegations as has been made public relating to mister Doan.
Speaker 0: Is he still subject of an investigation?
Speaker 1: That review is ongoing.
Speaker 0: That review of whether or not he's gonna be the subject of an investigation is underway, so that's a possibility.
Speaker 1: The review of the allegations we received.
Speaker 0: So that's a possibility.
Speaker 2: Correct.
Speaker 0: Correct? Now Mindone, confirmed this and through, ATIPS, delivered to CBSA has confirmed that Mindon, has 4 years' worth of highly relevant, sensitive emails, between the years of 2018 to 2022, which not only captures the pandemic and the ArriveCam scandal, but as well as the Baller AI investigations have just mysteriously been corrupted. He's not taking responsibility for deliberately deleting that. The approximate amount of those emails is roughly 7 gigabytes or 1700 emails. You would agree with me, sir, that emails are supposed
Speaker 2: to be Sorry, Mr. Brock. This is Gerard and I don't believe any of us has You've seen this statement of fact. Do you have a copy that you can share with us?
Speaker 0: Mindon, at the time, was the Vice President of the CBSA. Say, you'd agree with me, sir, that deleting emails is an extremely serious offense.
Speaker 1: It would be a breach of the code of conduct to Right. Delete emails.
Speaker 0: And it's incumbent on an IT professional, as Mindong was, to protect work emails dealing with official matters, correct?
Speaker 1: It is part of our responsibilities.
Speaker 0: And the level of seriousness increases dependent on the position that a public servant holds. In this case, a low level administrative data entry individual is vastly different in terms of the serious scale than the Vice President of the CBSA when you reference deleting emails. Would you agree with that? When was the president, Aaron O'Gorman, informed about mister Doan's deleted emails?
Speaker 2: We have not concluded that there were any deleted emails.
Speaker 0: When was she informed, sir?
Speaker 1: She was informed of the allegations when I received them.
Speaker 0: Of the deleted emails?
Speaker 1: The allegations as I received them. When was it? December 11th is when I received them. I can't recall exactly which
Speaker 0: when was the auditor general notified of 4 years' worth of deleted relevant emails?
Speaker 1: Again, one point of clarification. I have no evidence that there has been deletion at this point. We are looking into the matter. Can you
Speaker 0: answer the question, mister Lafleur? When was the auditor general notified of 4 years' worth of a vice president's deleted email account? When was she notified and by
Speaker 1: whom? So I can say that during our various engagements with the Office of the Auditor General, we have provided them with all of the information that we had available.
Speaker 0: Did you inform the Auditor General yourself, sir, or someone under your control that the Auditor General received evidence of 4 years' worth of deleted emails by Mindon Vice President. Yes or no?
Speaker 1: Again, I'm not or what you're referencing. I did meet with the OAG.
Speaker 0: The chair, can we get some clarity please? My questions are very direct.
Speaker 1: Mr. Leclerc, if you ask me
Speaker 2: to just respond and just a direct answer please, if it's a yes or no, please a direct yes or no, otherwise, direct answer so we can move on.
Speaker 0: Did you notify the auditor general of 4 years' worth of deleted emails?
Speaker 1: I notified the auditor general that I had received allegations to that And
Speaker 0: when did you when did you notify her? In December,
Speaker 1: after
Speaker 0: I received the December of 23? 23. Okay. Was the Treasury Board Secretariat informed? No.
Did you inform the RCMP of potentially 4 years' worth of highly confidential relevant emails.
Speaker 1: We are required to report potential criminality. I have no evidence of that at this time.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Wow. No evidence of potentially deliberately deleting emails and that is not criminality to you.
Speaker 2: Mister Brock, that is our time. Wow.
reSee.it AI Summary
After receiving contracts shortly after his election, Justin Trudeau was asked about it. He responded by stating his focus on housing, healthcare, and affordability for Canadians. Critics argue that he is unable to answer questions and unfit for office.
@govt_corrupt - govt.exe is corrupt
#WATCH: When asked why a company that began receiving millions in contracts 3 weeks after Justin Trudeau was elected... The Prime Minister responded by saying he's focused on building more homes, strengthening healthcare and making life more affordable for Canadians! JUSTIN TRUDEAU IS INCAPABLE OF ANSWERING QUESTIONS AND IS UNFIT FOR OFFICE!
Video Transcript AI Summary
A company that never had federal government contracts suddenly received a billion dollars for IT, even though it doesn't do IT and has only 4 employees in a basement cottage headquarters. The speaker questions why this suspicious company started getting contracts exactly 21 days after the prime minister took office. The prime minister's response is that the relevant authorities need to investigate the situation. Meanwhile, the focus on the government's side is on making life more affordable for Canadians, such as attracting healthcare workers, forgiving student loans for rural doctors and nurses, and accelerating housing construction. The conservative party is blocking these initiatives, but the government will continue to support Canadians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's recap. A company that had never before received contracts from the federal government started getting an avalanche of contracts just 3 weeks after this prime minister took office. The company, in fact, got a quarter of a $1,000,000,000 for IT even though it admits it doesn't do IT. It has 4 employees and has a headquarters in the basement of a cottage. Can the prime minister explain why this suspicious company started getting these contracts exactly 21 days after he took office.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. The right honorable prime minister.
Sir, obviously, The relevant authorities need to follow-up on this and get to the bottom of exactly how this unacceptable situation happened. In the meantime, on this side Side of the house, we're gonna continue to focus on making life more affordable for Canadians. For example, attracting thousands of health care workers to by increasing By 50% student loan forgiveness for rural doctors and nurses, by fast tracking the construction of more than 51,000 Homes by finalizing the housing accelerator agreements with over 60 small and rural communities. While the conservative party continues to block these initiatives, we're gonna continue to step up for Canadians.
@chrisdacey - Dacey Media
PM @JustinTrudeau goes on unhinged, arm flailing rant responding to a question about the Winnipeg lab leak. He blames @PierrePoilievre for "spewing conspiracy theories" and says the Conservative Party are "not worthy of Opposition". https://t.co/wHJxmF3vyp
Video Transcript AI Summary
A scientist at the National Microbiology Lab collaborating with Chinese agencies raised security concerns. The government is investigating and taking steps to ensure safety. The Conservative party's focus on political attacks and conspiracy theories is hindering progress. Responsible leadership is needed to address national security issues effectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Next question.
Speaker 1: Jordan Omset with the Canadian Press. How is a scientist working on high security viruses at the National Microbiology Lab allowed to collaborate with Chinese government agencies considered a threat to Canada?
Speaker 0: A number of years ago, the our security systems, our our intelligence and security agencies, flagged problems at the Winnipeg Labs that were followed up on. We know as a country that increasingly, countries like China and others are trying to either, influence, or, get secrets out of our country. And that's why we have to continue to be extraordinarily vigilant about how we're, making sure we're doing everything necessary to keep people safe, to keep our research institutions safe. As a government, we've taken many, many initiatives, and I've, tasked our National Security and Intelligence Advisor to look even deeper at this Winnipeg's lab situation and make recommendations on how we can move forward appropriately. This is, something that people would expect governments to take seriously and expect all parliamentarians to take seriously.
Unfortunately, throughout this process, we have seen the conservative party, specifically Pierre Poliyev, choosing to spew conspiracy theories and drum up political attacks, partisan attacks on an issue that quite frankly, should be bringing Canadians and parliamentarians together to try and solve this. The quickness with which they're looking for partisan advantage is not just undermining Canadians' trust in the system, but interfering with the ability of Parliament to deal with this. One of the reasons it has taken so long to get this report into parliament, is because of the choice that conservatives made to try and extract any amount of political advantage by drumming up a level of of partisanship and toxicity that is not serving Canadians. There's lots of opportunity to have responsible political debates about how we're moving forward as a country or what needs to be fixed, what's being done well, what needs to be done better. Absolutely.
That's part of the give and take in our democracy. But the choice to weaponize national security in a way that is rife with conspiracy theories, and partisan attacks is a choice that I don't think is worthy of the kind of responsible leadership that Canadians deserve. I will also add that, hearing 2 particular conservative members, Michael Chong and James Bezan, suddenly, being, front and center on issues of security and international for example, or even on the matter of, their colleague, Lesley Lewis calling for, a withdrawal from the United Nations of Canada, they won't say a thing. But when it comes to making partisan attacks out of an issue that should, be taken seriously by all part parliamentarians, it's not worthy of an official opposition. Thank you.
Last quest.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Trudeau Govt is using Meltwater, a private social media surveillance company, to track Canadians' posts and opinions. They are also allowing Meltwater access to Stats Can databases. Meltwater recently partnered with Microsoft, raising concerns about data sharing. Some question if the Govt is using taxpayer money for propaganda rather than saving costs.
@NyaPfanner - Nya Pfannerstill
The Trudeau Govt is using private social media surveillance company "Meltwater" to track Canadians posts, trends, and opinions. The Govt is also allowing Meltwater to Stats Can databases of CDN's https://t.co/KwI1TdGFg9
@NyaPfanner - Nya Pfannerstill
Meltwater recently partnered with Microsoft to handle its data processing and storage needs, so everything will be shared down the line. The Trudeau Govt is not paying millions of tax dollars to find out how it can save us money, but to learn how build better propaganda https://t.co/9d1ZPKELW2
@ContrarianTribe - Contrarian
🇨🇦Trudeau today in his testimony let everyone know he does not bother reading briefings especially ones on Foreign Interference?🤔 https://t.co/9CVoX9p46Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
In briefings, decisions on what to read are crucial. It's more about discussing than just reading notes to ministers. The briefing notes highlight the seriousness of foreign interference and the need for action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When it comes to briefings, and others can speak to this and how they make decisions about what to read from their prepared notes during an actual briefing with ministers or a prime minister. But it is much A conversation than someone reading a prepared text to, to to, the minister that they're briefing. There are elements in here that say, for example, having read the briefing note in preparation for this, this inquiry, They talk about how serious foreign interference is and how we need to do more.
@MelissaLMRogers - Melissa 🇨🇦
OKAY 👀 So government employees 🇨🇦 were paid up to $250,000 to distribute FAKE NEWS. So it’s not just CBC 😆 https://t.co/QhTro6KMz2
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Trudeau's recent Senate appointments are a disgrace, announced during the Labour Day long weekend to avoid scrutiny. This move feels like a direct affront to Senate reform and a dismissal of Albertans' concerns. Among the appointees is Kristopher Wells, whom I view as a trans extremist. His past actions, including revising a cartoon to depict Christians as executing LGBT individuals, raise serious concerns. I worry that Christians will now face an extremist and bigoted presence in the Senate.
@ezralevant - Ezra Levant 🍁🚛
Trudeau knows his new Senate appointments are a disgrace, so he announced them on the Labour Day long weekend. This is a slap in the face to Senate reform, a giant F-you to Albertans. He appointed a trans extremist, @KristopherWells, who once revised a cartoon that showed ISIS terrorist executing Christians, and made it into a cartoon of Christians executing LGBT. Christians can expect an extremist, bigoted enemy in the Senate now. So gross. https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-releases/2024/08/31/prime-minister-announces-appointment-senators
Prime Minister announces the appointment of senators
Daryl Fridhandler is a corporate lawyer, arbitrator, mediator, and businessman with over 40 years of legal experience.
pm.gc.ca
@JasminLaine_ - Jasmin Laine 🇨🇦
In 2 minutes, CBC insults Pierre Poilievre, mocks him, defends Carney’s cabinet picks and reminds us how unbiased they are. Weasels… but they did just get a big payday from the Liberals, so get ready for even more of this! https://t.co/3oAf6Aw6qH
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to Speaker 0, Mr. Polyev stated he would not reflexively oppose the government, but support it when in the country's best interest, because he wants the country to succeed. However, he then spent fifteen minutes attacking ministers like Sean Fraser and Stephen Guildeaux for ruining the country.
Speaker 1 noted Mr. Polyev's approach suggests he won the election, not lost it. He will only be able to stand in defense of Canadians because of the Prime Minister's goodwill in calling an early by-election for him in Alberta, costing close to $2,000,000. Speaker 1 found it interesting that Mr. Polyev is going after Stephen Gabbeau, blaming Sean Frazier for the housing crisis, and wanting to fight the same political battles from the last campaign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And talking about how, he would not be opposing the government reflexively, that he would do things in the best interest of the country and support the government in those issues and that he says he wants, the country to succeed. He then spent the next fifteen minutes talking about all the ministers, who were there previously and the things they did to to ruin the country, naming particularly Sean Fraser and Steven Guildeaux, taking some questions about how he will approach things inside the house of commons. But but overall, you know, it started out in one tone and finished in another. That's all I'll say. Because he he he leaned into attacking the people that he thinks still represent, don't represent change, are still more of the Trudeau government, and particularly don't represent the things that he thinks Canadians want right now.
Speaker 1: Yes. Cabinet is broken, is essentially what he said. Right? It's not no longer Canada's broken. He's saying this cabinet has not changed.
A silent approach from Mr. Polyev, Rosie, that would suggest it's almost as if he won the election rather than lost the election and lost his own seat. You know, talking about how he's going to stand there in defense of Canadians, he'll only be able to stand there, actually, in the chamber behind him because of the goodwill of prime minister who's going to call an early by election for mister Polyyev so he can run-in one of his MP seats in Alberta at the cost of close to $2,000,000 to have a by election, all while he stays in Stornoway throughout this. So it's interesting that given that sequence of events and given those series of factors that it was that kind of approach and response to things there from Mr. Polyev, going after Stephen Gabbeau talking over the radical environmental agenda, blaming Sean Frazier for the housing crisis, which is Sean Frazier is in, I don't think he's 40 yet or he's just 40.
I don't think he caused the housing crisis in There's a whole bunch of layers and effects of that. But, you know, wanting to fight the same political battles we just enjoyed during the five weeks of the campaign and for the two years leading up to that. So, the pivot that people have suggested Mr. Hawley have kind of needed to made ever since Justice Trudeau left and Donald Trump came in, it's
Speaker 0: still
@KettyLuvz - KettyLove
@reSeeIt save thread https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1985044233150243119.html
Thread by @KettyLuvz on Thread Reader App
@KettyLuvz:
threadreaderapp.com