TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@ganaha_masako - 我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha
I encountered Klaus Schwab! And here is what happened. He is afraid of our resistance! @ WEF Davos2023 https://t.co/QMVixy2wyE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jeremy Schwab, from Japan, identifies himself and asks for a comment, but the people being approached are in a rush. “We’re on our way to the next thing. We’re a bit late,” they say, and they thank him as they decline to stop. Despite the time pressure, Jeremy presses to ask one more question: “I have to ask. Thank you. Thanks, Thank you.” The interaction remains brief and cordial, with the interviewer explaining the constraints of the moment.
When Jeremy asks, “Which media are you with?” the response is: “I am an independent journalist from Japan.” The exchange continues with gratitude from the interviewers, who acknowledge the request but reiterate the lack of time. They say, “No. Thank you very much,” and “But I I I wanted to ask just just one more. One question.” They express appreciation for the attempt but emphasize their busy schedule: “We’re in a big rush. We’ve got so many things tonight.” They remark on the significance of “Precious moments” and acknowledge the difficulty of stopping for every inquiry, noting, “You can I can he’s got so many people stopping that if you were to stop for everything Yeah? We win.”
The speakers convey a sense of regret about the refusal to engage further, stating, “That’s the unfortunate. So I’m very sorry, but thank But Thank you for trying.” The dialogue then shifts in a fragmented way, with one speaker asking, “Do do you know the voice that worry about globalism? Thank you. Yeah.” There is a mention that someone is “meeting on the phone,” followed by a courteous sign-off: “Nice evening. Thank you. Thank you.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jeremy Schwab. Jeremy Schwab. I'm from Japan. May I ask you for I'm from Japan. Yeah.
And may I ask you for a comment? No. We're on our we're on our way to the next thing. We're a bit late. Oh, I thank you.
Thank And then ask questions. Think we're gonna we're gonna rush. But thank you. Thanks very much. Oh, but
Speaker 1: Which which media are you with?
Speaker 0: I am an independent journalist from Japan.
Speaker 1: No. Thank you very much.
Speaker 0: I have to ask. Thank you. Thanks, Thank you. But I I I wanted to ask just just one more. One question.
Thank you. Thank you. Take care of yourself. I can just walk and ask you. Yeah.
We're not Just thank you. Sorry. We're in a big rush. We've got so many things tonight. But for us, it's it's very I know.
Precious moments. I know. I know. You can I can he's got so many people stopping that if you were to stop for everything Yeah? We win.
That's the unfortunate. So I'm very sorry, but thank But Thank you for trying. Do do you know the voice that worry about globalism? Thank you. Yeah.
I'm meeting on the phone. Nice evening. Thank you. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
Major corporations prioritize profits over funding research. Instead, they promote Disease X, a scare tactic to secure taxpayer money. A former WHO medical officer warns of the risks. Pandemic preparedness plans must be scrutinized. The world's safety is at stake. #PublicHealth #PandemicRisk
@JanJekielek - Jan Jekielek
"They're not going to fund research into something that risks a major hit on their profits. So they’d rather push something like Disease X where you can scare the population into thinking that just around the corner is another massive plague and that if tens of billions of dollars of taxpayers money aren’t put into this industry…then the whole world will be at risk." @brownstoneinst’s @bell00david, a former WHO medical officer and scientist, on new Disease X pandemic preparedness plans.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Disease X, a hypothetical new virus or pathogen, is unlikely to cause a major disaster due to advancements in medicine, antibiotics, and hygiene. However, funding for research into other diseases is hindered by the pharmaceutical industry's fear of potential financial losses. Instead, the industry promotes the idea of Disease X to scare the population into investing in their rapidly growing sector. The risk of a pandemic caused by human manipulation of pathogens is low but accidents can happen. Public health needs to be reevaluated to address the industry's self-interest. The future may involve a cycle of finding variants, implementing lockdowns, and mandating vaccines for profit. This could lead to a loss of individual freedom unless society chooses to prioritize democracy and personal autonomy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Disease X is about worrying about a new virus or a new pathogen bacteria that is suddenly going to emanate from somewhere on Earth and be a bubonic plague type disaster for humanity. Such a thing hasn't happened at all or in the west since good sanitation and anywhere on earth, so a couple 100 years, anywhere on earth since the advent of antibiotics. So almost certainly it's not going to happen. We also have much better medicine now. So historically, it's a rather silly concept because we have antibiotics have better medicine, we have good hygiene, which was one of the main issues for previous plagues.
So the problem is that you're not going to make money out of these other problems. And I think there's a fear if they look into mortality and they look into autism, etcetera, that they will find pharmaceutical contributors. And that could cost tens of 1,000,000,000 or 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars to the industry. The industry is where most of this funding comes from for medical research. So they're not going to fund research into something that risks a major hit on their profits.
So that they would rather look at, push something like disease X where you can scare the population into thinking that just around the corner is another massive plague and that if tens of 1,000,000,000 of dollars of taxpayers' money aren't put into this industry that is rapidly growing, then the whole world will be at risk. And so we downplay these other major disease burdens and growing disease burdens. And we put all the emphasis on, you know, it's something like a meteorite hitting the earth once every 60 a 1000000 years. It's incredibly unlikely event unless you surmise that, human manipulation of pathogens is going to cause a leak or an outbreak.
Speaker 1: Well, and so, you know, we're increasingly, sure that it was indeed a leak of something that was manipulated that caused the pandemic in the 1st place.
Speaker 0: Yeah, and we know that a lot of that research is still going on. So it's not unexpected that accidents happen and that will happen again. But then you have to be honest the public. If you are taking this money to prepare for another research mistake, then the obvious mitigation would be don't fund that sort of research. It wouldn't be spend even more money to mitigate the downside of, the other money that you're spending.
But if you're in virus research, if you're in public health on an international scale, this is where the money is. So we have a huge industry that needs to be fed. And so there's a huge self interest now in pushing these unlikely scenarios, these unlikely public health scenarios. And is fixing that is not gonna come from the public health side because that's the industry that's making the money. Fixing it will only come I think when the public see that in many ways, this is a scam, that this isn't in their interest and that we've got to sort of dial back and look at what the actual role of public health should be.
Speaker 1: Where do you see this all going as we wrap up?
Speaker 0: I think the push is to I think there's a high likelihood it will get worse, I think. So we have a 100 day vaccine coming from CEPI, which is a coalition for epidemic preparedness innovations, it's a private public partnership based in Europe. It was started by the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and some government at the World Economic Forum. So it's one of a number of satellites around the World Health Organization in this area. And the aim and it will happen is they will have a way of making a vaccine in 100 days for a new variant.
We have this huge industry being set up to surveil for variants. And the model that they are pushing for public health is that they will find variants, they will lock people down, they will mandate or allow them to have a vaccine to get their freedom back. And then the vaccine will make have asked profit and then the cycle will go around, they'll find another variant. And this is a future that is sort of mapped out. And it'll be very hard to get out of once we have things like Central Bank Digital Currency, a programmable currency where if you don't get the vaccine, they could stop you buying groceries.
And we've seen this sort of thing already in Canada. It's not it's talked about by the Bank of International Settlements. These aren't conspiracy theories. These are what the people who are making money out of this and involved in the finance world are saying they intend to happen. So we can go down that road, which is a sort of, you know, almost an international fascist state where we will have a technocracy at the top based on health and on mandates and on restricting freedom unless you comply.
Or people can sort of step back now and say this isn't what we fought for in World Wars, it's not what, this country, the United States or other Western countries or other democracies around the world was supposed to be built on. If bodily autonomy, if individual sovereignty are important, then we had to stop complying with this direction and go back to a system, a democracy where the individual is sovereign and all these other agencies. They can give advice, but they can't tell someone how to live their lives and they can't take away freedom. So they're really the 2 parts that we have in front of this and you know, we have to get away from this left right thing that's going on. I think really it's we've we have a choice of sticking with freedom in an open constitute for democracies or we have a choice of going towards fascism and it's a choice we need to make fairly soon properly.
@ValentinKranz1 - ValoLoco
Just a kind reminder: https://youtu.be/UDAbvTTOilY?feature=shared #reshare #2023 #scam #covid #Science @elonmusk @joerogan @hubermanlab @tate
@ValentinKranz1 - ValoLoco
@reSeeIt save thread
@unhealthytruth - Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌
Wow. Definitely worth the watch. #MustWatch #BillGates. #COVID19 The WEF. Etc.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the concept of belief and how it is shaped by the information we receive. It touches on the topic of elite pedophile rings and the alleged involvement of powerful individuals. The speaker mentions the controversy surrounding the "Pizzagate" conspiracy theory and the use of code words in emails. They also discuss the connection between Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, as well as the role of Marina Abramovic and her controversial art. The video concludes by promoting a film called "Sound of Freedom" that aims to raise awareness about child trafficking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why do you
Speaker 1: believe what you believe? Because at some point in your life, you trusted the information that somebody was giving you. And that someone you trusted told you that a car was a car, a tree shared with a bird, the blue stuff above you is the sky, and that's the way that we began to determine what we believe to be a fact. Most of the things that we believe to be a fact in our lives are told to us through our stories or the news that we hear. So my question would be, if they were deceiving you with the stories they tell you, would you be able to recognize that?
Speaker 2: Look. Talking of all you perverts, it was a big year it was a big year for pedophile movies. Surviving R. Kelly, Leaving Neverland to popes. Shut up.
Shut up. I don't care. I don't care.
Speaker 3: Most people don't wanna cross the psychological line that this stuff is going on. And we all have a mental defense mechanism. It's like finally admitting there's an elite pedophile ring. I mean, most people just don't wanna go there. And and the same is here.
Psychologically, you lose your safety, your security, and whatever innocence you have when you realize that this stuff is really going on. And it's a it's a chore to cross over that barrier and realize, oh my gosh. This stuff is really happening. And that's why it takes critical thinking. The people got to look at this stuff critically and see what they're being fed so they can cross that psychological line that they just refuse to to see it when it's right in front of them.
Speaker 1: When Kevin said there's an elite pedophile ring, well, I'm thinking to myself, this is this is a hard thing for me to come to terms with. Now it made me start thinking about conversations and things I heard, but I'd never saw it. It's not out in the open. Tend to me, I was like, no one could do that. Because I mean, if I saw someone hurt your kid, I
Speaker 4: would kill them. I should literally kill them.
Speaker 1: I would never allow someone to hurt a child in front of me. Things Kevin was saying were things that were tried for me to cross the barrier. I did not want to believe it. I didn't want to go there. But as I went down this journey, I forced myself have to go consider what if this is real.
And the only person that was talking about this stuff was a girl named Liz Crokin, and the media had declared her completely out of her mind, but as I started researching some of the things she was reporting on, I was like, there there's truth to what she's saying.
Speaker 5: So I wanna talk to her.
Speaker 6: I started working in journalism at a very young age. I got my 1st job working for Fox Chicago at about the age of 17 years old. At the University of Iowa, I studied political science in journalism. 1 semester, I interned for Bill O'Reilly at Fox News channel my last year in college. I interned for the state department, White House quarter and that placed me reporting in the White House every single day for a few months.
I went on work for the Chicago Tribune. And my 1st boss there told me that everything that I should get to be checked over and over and over again and verified to death. That's how I was trained and that's what A true honest journalist does. I started covering local politics and local card news. And then eventually, I got my own column for 7 years where I interview tons of celebrities and politicians and musicians and worked at Us Weekly.
And then at one point, I worked at In Touch Weekly Magazine. But then 2015, I felt the need to get back into covering hard news. And in early 2016, I started working town hall and then eventually, I started working for the New York Observer and broke a lot of election related stories. I worked in media for over 2 decades and I never had any issues. I was very well respected.
I basically was embraced by the mainstream media until I start reporting on Now when PizzaGate came out, The media tried to turn Pizzagate into something that wasn't.
Speaker 7: Surprises of the presidential campaign was the explosion of Fake news on the Internet. 28 year old Edgar Welch was arrested in Washington Sunday afternoon outside comet Ping Pong, a popular family pizza parlor. DC police say Welch fired at least 1 round into the restaurant floor with an AR 15 rifle like this one check on his Facebook page. No one was injured.
Speaker 0: Someone on Twitter whose name remains unverified but has several 1,000 followers posted that new emails found on Anthony Weiner's computer confirmed that Hillary Clinton was involved in a pedophilia ring. The rumors spread inspiring some new found Internet sleuths to start digging around in John Podesta's hacked emails searching for proof and location of the so called X-ray.
Speaker 6: In those emails, they are absolutely littered with code words. And many of these code words are food words such as pizza.
Speaker 1: Somebody said to me, hey, Dave. Search for pizza in Podesta's emails. And once you go down that rabbit hole, you never really emerge the same person.
Speaker 6: It was obvious from the get go that these Words were code words for something else because the context that they were used in do not make sense.
Speaker 0: To be clear, Not one single email in the Podesta emails discusses child sex trafficking or pedophilia. That is a fact. But there are dozens of what seem to be strangely worded emails dealing with pizza and handkerchiefs. Investigators say that those words in the emails about pizza and the talk of handkerchiefs is code language used by pedophiles.
Speaker 1: There is some kind of code language. They're just not talking about pizza folks. Who praises that? Who blocks out an hour of time to eat a slice of pizza?
Speaker 6: You can get a service for half hour you can get a massage for half an hour, but you can't get food for half an hour. It just absolutely makes no sense.
Speaker 8: There's other ones like, the realtor found a handkerchief. I think it has a map that seems pizza related. And, another one is Obama spent 65 $1,000 flying in pizza and hot dogs from Chicago. Are we using the same channel?
Speaker 6: Pizza is a well known pedophile code word check. That actually has been used by law enforcement to arrest online sexual predators of children. And there's been multiple arrests that have been made By law enforcement of pedophiles trying to solicit children by using the pedophile code word pizza.
Speaker 0: Ch 2007, unclassified FBI document. That document, according to the FBI, contained commonly used symbols by pedophiles to express their preference in children. Notice this one on the end, the triangle. That image signifies something called boy love. The piece the place next door to Comet Ping Pong pizza.
That's the pizza? Well, this was their logo until only a few weeks ago.
Speaker 6: People don't know that because the mainstream media refuses to cover it. The entire mainstream media redefined what pizza gate was To make it sound ridiculous and less believable, and then they had people like Megyn Kelly come in, Interviewed James Alefantis, didn't ask him any challenging questions.
Speaker 9: A conspiracy theory, but even the DC police say has know, faces in fact.
Speaker 6: She didn't ask many questions about the pictures of children on his Instagram page looking abused, Being sexualized. You didn't ask him about the pedophile talk. So the whole mainstream media painted him as this poor victim, as this person that was Innocent that was just victimized to something that wasn't true, but just his Instagram page alone should have been enough for authorities To look into him.
Speaker 0: Investigators have already proven there's nothing to the story. Right? Well, actually, no. And that's what you need to know. For all that is here, there has not been 1 single public investigation of any of this.
Not from local police, not from the FBI, try no one. And that has to be the big question. Not for Podesta or for pizza parlor owners, But for law enforcement, based on what may be or may not be here, the big question is why hasn't any investigation can't taking place.
Speaker 6: This is insane. So many people in the mainstream media have said, Pizzagate is conspiracy theory. Pizzagate has been debunked. It Has not been debunked. If it's been debunked, explain the code words.
No one to this day, including John Podesta can explain the code words in his email. Hey, John, can you please explain why you have children rented for entertainment for your adult cocktail parties. No one has ever explained why John just has literal pedophiles, cannibalism, paintings, all over his office and his home. Tony choose, and then you look into the spirit cooking dinners and you look at him right now. Who's the one that was conducting the spirit cooking dinners.
Why are they going to spirit cooking dinners? Why are they sacrificing to get some more in their backyard? This isn't my words. This is their words. This is in their email.
I'd be willing just Debate anyone who thinks that PC gate has been debunked.
Speaker 0: You asked me when Yeah. When did, how am I getting additional briefings? That that was the 1st and last time I talked to. October 9th is the last time you've heard from the FBI at all. Yes.
Speaker 4: You have not got an update on
Speaker 0: the investigation your personal email.
Speaker 5: That that is correct.
Speaker 6: So not only did the mainstream media lie to you about Pizzagate, they actually Told you that it was illegal to read John Podesta's emails on WikiLeaks. Chris Cuomo with straight face On CNN looked into the cameras and said, it's illegal for you to read John Podesta's emails.
Speaker 10: Also interesting is, remember, it's illegal to possess, these stolen documents. It's different for the media. So everything you learn about this, you're learning from us.
Speaker 6: That's how scared they are of those emails just And that's how explosive the content in those emails are. That they felt the need that they had to tell you you could not read those emails. And if you do, you might get arrested. Lie.
Speaker 10: It's different for the media. So everything you learn about this, you're learning from us.
Speaker 6: People that blow the whistle on elite pedophiles tend to have accidents. And a lot of those people have died mysteriously.
Speaker 0: NBC News has learned that disgraced finance dear Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Epstein took his own life while he was behind bars.
Speaker 11: There's absolutely no excuses. What happened here to me is mind boggling. The guy was a high risk prison. Was wasn't he? I mean, he he's a guy that there are probably 50 very important people that have a motive to kill him.
Don't even know who they are. It's true. But we know there are some people that are in a lot of trouble because of Epstein. They know who they are.
Speaker 6: To someone's query testimony you're about to give an amount of information.
Speaker 12: A shocking new report from the New York Times sheds light on the connection Between Microsoft founder, Bill Gates and the late Jeffrey Epstein. You report these 2 men met at least 6 times.
Speaker 5: Well, I
Speaker 13: believe that if there were more, this included visits to the mansion, seeing each other in Seattle, flying on Epstein's plane.
Speaker 5: Check. When flight logs revealed that Gates had been a passenger on the Lolita Express, he claimed that he didn't know that the private jet belonged to Epstein. He also denied that he and mister Epstein were involved in any business deals. However, an expose by the New York Times revealed that not only the Bill Gates initiate a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein well, after he was convicted of sex crimes, but the 2 were also involved in the process co founding a multi $1,000,000,000 charitable fund.
Speaker 12: Why would they ever set up a charitable trust benefiting Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4: That it
Speaker 13: was all about philanthropy. That Bill Gates just wanted to find new sources of money.
Speaker 5: Why would one of the richest men in the world choose to partner with the world's most notorious pedophile?
Speaker 6: His flight laws Contain names of some of the biggest, most famous, and most powerful people on the planet. Members of the royal family, Prince Andrew, mottos like Naomi Campbell, famous actors like Kevin Spacey, Bill Clinton on those flight logs over 25 times. Hillary Clinton, she's also been to the island. So the bigger question is, How many people that went on his private jet, that went to his private island, that went to his massive ranch in New Mexico, were also involved in the rape, torture and trafficking of children.
Speaker 14: It hides in plain sight. Epstein was hiding in plain sight. We all knew about it. We all knew what he was doing, but we had no one that was no, legal aspect that would go after him. They were afraid of him for whatever reason they are afraid.
Speaker 6: And the amazing thing about Cindy McCain is that her husband was a senator. She was on a board with the Governor of Texas, she knew about Jeffrey Epstein. She did nothing. And her organization the role of her organization is just Supposed to be to stop people like Jeffrey Epstein. They all knew.
They did nothing about it. When Ricky Gervais said, At the Golden Globes, you're all friends with Jeffrey Epstein. He wasn't lying.
Speaker 2: So in the end, he obviously didn't kill himself just like Jeffrey kept saying, shut up. I know he's your friend, but I don't care. You have to make your own way here and your own plane, didn't you? Right. But And
Speaker 6: how many of those elites have been to the island? Not only is the mainstream media complicit, I would argue that there are accessories in the crimes against Children.
Speaker 9: She told me everything. She had pictures. She had everything. She was in hiding for 12 years. We convinced her to come out.
We We convinced her to talk to us. It was unbelievable what we had. Clinton we had everything. I I tried for 3 years to get it on to no avail, and now it's all coming out. And it's like these new revelations that I freaking had all of it.
I I I'm so pissed right now. Like, everyday I get more and more pissed because I'm just like, oh my god. We it was what what we had was unreal. Just Brad Edwards, the attorney, 3 years ago saying, like, like, we there will come a day when we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific the title this country has ever known. I had it all 3 years ago.
Speaker 6: Then what happened in early 2018, Keith Raniere, who ran the Nexium just Child sex trafficking cult was arrested. Who else was arrested? Allison Match. He's a Famous celebrity who was on Smallville. He was also arrested for being a member of this cult That was involved in trafficking children.
And not only trafficking children, they were running preschools down in Mexico. And Nexium is another example of how these elite pedophile rings exist. Because this was a massive organization. This was funded by really wealthy people, including the Seagram heiresses, Nancy Salzman, and Claire Bromfman. Just So, obviously, they were using those preschools to traffic children.
And the cult also engaged in just Human torture experiments on some of their members. And there actually was a civil lawsuit that was filed by 90 of their victims just the other day. So I imagine we are gonna hear more about the human experiments, the torturing, the sexual abuse and the child sex trafficking in this civil lawsuit. And a lot of the techniques that we see in this call are very similar to the techniques that our government used in the MK Ultra program.
Speaker 15: It was a branding women with case initials. And they were like, well, what's what's the bad thing exactly about that? Everyone in the outside world, AKA the real world is like the branding women. So I left, just, I went to the executive board and I said, I want my photos back. I want my videos back.
The branding session was filmed. I want that back. Put my collateral back. None of that happened.
Speaker 3: And it's it's the same fear, mind control, and you'll be destroyed if you cross, get into the upper elites, and if you get to that point, if you start revealing anything, they have the same system to completely destroy you, destroy your career, blackmail you like Epstein, keep you catch you, film you in compromising positions, and and and this goes both, within Hollywood and celebrities and some of the elite, and it also goes on in congress and the senate. And if they even insinuate That they're gonna reveal some of these things, they're done.
Speaker 6: The powerful people that be whether it's the music industry or the movie the industry. You are only allowed a certain level of success if you are willing to join their club. If you're willing to be part of their secret society or if you're compromised, they will not let someone obtain a lot of fame in and power if they can't tell a
Speaker 3: classic example, at least for me is Katy Perry. Katy Perry was, was a gospel singer, very talented. But she was going nowhere and she got up to Hollywood and and basically they said you want to be a success You play by our rules you step into the occult and you start putting that in your videos. And now she's doing videos with her in hell with satanic themes. And she's what highly successful.
You see that over with Lady Gaga who came out and actually said she was so tired of being handled and manipulated. She had to take a break.
Speaker 16: That this is this young, outrageous girl wearing strange clothes. She's into extremes. She's experimental. She has 43,000,000 people on the Twitter following her, whatever she do with the monsters, And
Speaker 14: she came really very humble to my house and asked me if I could teach her. We made this workshop in the woods, And she was such a pursuit of it. She never cheats. She really went much farther than I asked her for.
Speaker 17: She is a limitless human being. As myself, a self proclaimed top performance artist, wanna go home and just Let my wrist and and I you know, I have nothing. I have achieved no sense of art. She is she is so found less
Speaker 14: the the the performance. Just well, I'm not sure what it must be.
Speaker 6: Marina Abramovic, of course, is in the Podesta emails and she's the one that conducts the spear cooking dinners. She said that Marina did an exercise with her where she stripped her completely naked and left her in the middle of the woods just fend for herself and find her way back. Those are the kinds of things that people who are behind MK Ultra programs do to children that their mind controlling. We know Marina Abramovic is a satanist. You Google Marina Abramovic's name and spirit cooking, and you will find hundreds of pictures of Marina Abramovic's events where they will have, for example, a cake that looks like a human being and they'll depict human cannibalism, and they claim they're not engaging in cannibalism.
And you will find a list actors and famous politicians and other very famous and successful powerful business people At her event. They literally have food that look like human beings on dinner tables.
Speaker 14: He's Italian and Greek. I mean, you know, and a very good cook and a very good cook. And I'm sure there's something very nefarious about that Risotto recipe. So
Speaker 6: after I started researching that call, I learned chat. Satanists believe that they have to reveal who they are in some way, shape, or form. So that is why we see a lot of these told members in Hollywood constantly flaunting symbolism. We see the pyramid, the Illuminati pyramid a lot. We see the evil one.
I constantly, it's always on the cover of magazines. We see these are supposed to be the 666 double symbols that we constantly see those symbols. We also see pedophile symbols, the swirl or the triangle within a triangle.
Speaker 4: Can see this one is.
Speaker 6: And we also see a lot of these members of the cult go on their social media and they talk about raping children. They talk about worshiping Satan and people write it off as a joke, but they're not joking. I don't care if you're a major comedian, you can't tell me That's funny. Because there is no joke about raping children. That's funny.
Speaker 1: You don't know what that is. Have no idea. You don't know. Jimmy Fallon doesn't know. David Letterman doesn't know.
We don't know. All the comics and show business don't know what this is.
Speaker 3: They got to put out a film that does this because no one's done it up until now. But when that's done and people see these facts and they say, my gosh. I didn't know that. I didn't know that about the Gulf of Tonkin. I didn't know that about the Vietnam Vietnam were my gosh and they go in they check it out and it's all true.
And now they're seeing the dots And and and a good film will teach them how to practice critical thinking to analyze what you're watching. If we can get people to analyze what they're watching, we've trust a huge hurdle. Because once they start analyzing it, they're gonna see the dots, and typically the dots will connect themselves.
Speaker 1: Choose Liz Crokin put herself so far out in front that she was mocked. She was laughed at. She was called crazy. Well, let me ask you a question. For all those people that did that to Liz, does she seem so crazy now?
Speaker 6: When you put All of those facts together and you use critical thinking, you realize this stuff is real. There's not 1 smoking gun. There's many small smoking guns that you have to piece together And you have to use critical thinking to understand this stuff is real. So again, the bigger question can is, now that Jeffrey Epstein's been exposed and he's allegedly dead, how many of his friends that were frequent visitors on his sex trafficking islands. We're also involved in the rape, torture and trafficking of choose And that's what pizza gate is.
Speaker 4: How many pedophiles you got? 288. How many kids you got? It is the fastest growing international crime network that the world has ever it has already passed the illegal arms trade, and soon it's gonna pass the truck trade. Think you can sell a bag of cocaine one time to choose a child 5 to 10 times a day.
God's children are not for sale. How long have you been doing this?
Speaker 5: All here is now.
Speaker 4: How many petapause you got? 288. We should do that. For Homeland Security, you know, we can't go off rescuing Honduran kids in Colombia.
Speaker 5: Can you still disappear
Speaker 4: for good? I've been walking into a room right now, singing at the bed, just broke it down.
Speaker 14: You quit your job, and you go and rescue those kids.
Speaker 5: So at this moment, just It could be a block down the road or it could be a Moscow, Bangkok, LA.
Speaker 4: She's a major It's called rebel territory. No one goes either. Not the army, not the police, not press. What is this for you or daughter? There's no marine unit coming.
This deal tears you to pieces. And that's just my 1 just
Speaker 5: An estimated 2,000,000 children are trafficked every year, and we can help them. Sound of Freedom is based on a true story about real life heroes just saving kids from the dark world of child trafficking. We know this is heartbreaking and it hurts to look at. But the first step in helping these children is hearing their story. Not enough people know this problem exists and even fewer people are willing to do anything about it.
Check. Our goal is to inspire 2,000,000 people to attend the film's opening weekend to represent the 2,000,000 traffic children around the world. Just spread the word. Angel Studios set up the pay it forward program where you can pay for someone else's ticket might not otherwise see it. If the ticket price is stopping you from attending, claim your free ticket at angel.com/freedom.
Just Sound of Freedom opens the week of July 4th. Every parent, every adult, and every teenager in America should be there to see check. If millions of us come together today to see this phone, we could propel the movement to help save millions of children check around the world and you can send the message that God's children are no longer for sale.
reSee.it AI Summary
A panel exposed the WHO as a criminal organization, confirming Covid as a bioweapon. Dr. David Martin's speech is crucial. Share the video. Notable figures like Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, and Nigel Farage are involved.
@Restitutor_ - Restitutor Orbis
The most important video you will watch. Today, 13th September, A panel bravely exposed the WHO (World Health Organisation) for the criminal organisation it is, and proved that Covid is indeed a BioWeapon. This is Dr David Martin's Speech. Please Share https://t.co/jWMO5BH4n9
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and uses a four-step process to execute their plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a real health crisis but a deliberate act of genocide. They provide evidence of unethical practices, including the murder of children in vaccine trials. The speaker argues that the WHO and its collaborators should be held accountable for their crimes and calls for the organization to be dismantled.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where a group, a very small number of criminal industrial conspirators, decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity, and I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words. Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals.
Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit? Well, I'm going to tell you since its formation in 19 forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent, and I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying.
This is not an allegation. This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand, and they use a 4 step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do, and then they deploy and profit from it, and in violation of 15 US Code Section 19, which for those of you listening, coincidentally started with the Clayton Act in the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States, 1913, the same year the World Health Organization's progenitors also started, so I find it fascinating that we passed the Clayton Act in 1913 and we set in motion a 110 years ago the criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organization, a 110 years later. And in violation of TFIU, or TFEU, I don't know even how to say it, the TFEU, the treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the Treaty for the Dysfunctional European cabal, Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that this was never a public health anything.
It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behavior of a population. Period. That's what it was. That's what it always was, and we can come up with every theoretical argument we want to make about things, but the problem, even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something is falsifiable for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance companies paid $30,000,000,000 less in claims. Now if there's a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus, cunningly, that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements, and whether you're paid up on your premiums, that's a big ask.
It turns out that the data is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic. We had genocide, and we need to call it what it is. Next slide. When I say we planned it, let's make sure we understand exactly the not so fine print of the fine print, and I want to call your attention first to the right hand column of the slide.
This is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, PATH, and the Gates Foundation did on their wonderful worldwide program for malaria vaccine for children under the age of 6 months of age, and in their clinical trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the vaccine group and then cunningly used the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children. Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because it's exactly what it was, because it turns out that this control group was not a saline injection, it was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing, it was actually tale of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The control group was known to kill people, and the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe going to kill people, and what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all. And cunningly, under article 5, section 13, which I've put on this slide, I want you to understand why I said at its formation in 1947 when the WHO was funded and founded. It was funded and founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language.
Section 13 of Article 5 ends with the following statement: immunity from personal arrest or detention, blah blah blah, immunity from legal process of every kind. Now if you didn't intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution, and it's worse, even investigation for prosecution of every kind. People sit there and pretend, well, that's like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity. This is a criminal organization who set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit.
And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew it because their 1st Director General, none other than Doctor. Rene Essand, who happened to be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau in 1940, earlier in 1947, mysteriously, with the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation, was nominated to become the 1st Director General of the Who, and within 5 short years, Rene Sand decided to authorize the real purpose of the who in writing by then Director General Doctor. Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not public health.
This is the advancement of the same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics Office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy, philanthropy, of Andrew Carnegie. People, stop fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing, but we're not going to the root. This was an organized crime racketeering entity set up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies, and who gets any chance at life. And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers.
Let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, if I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest of any organization, you might conclude that that actually aggregates into a controlling interest, and it turns out that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitiveness law in the United States. This is absolutely not only not an independent, charitably funded donation, but more importantly, under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, this constitutes directed donations which specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations. When I say this is a crime, I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime, and now the crime of cheering leading to murder and global terrorism.
Next slide. I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it. Why don't we use the criminals' language in their own words because it's the best way to say it? When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified chimera associated with the model derived from coronavirus, they actually said the following: To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding.
There was no health crisis. This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry. That's the crisis. And let's read on. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype.
We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board of the World Health Organization, and it was the funding base for Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan. So don't tell me that we have to do an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it in their own words.
Next slide. Now we get the fun one that no one in Congress is willing to address, which is the elephant in the room. On October 21, 2014, despite the multiple conversations between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci, where we've been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes, he has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left, and it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill which unambiguously states that during the moratorium, which by the way, if we use the word moratorium, feels like that means you're supposed to stop, why don't we go ahead and look at 2 pieces of this letter? First, the 2nd bullet under Project 1, which by the way, was not part of the original grant. This was to look at the novel functions of the virus pathogenesis in vivo.
You know what that means? In living systems. The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models, but this grant was modified with this letter to say, we were going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems. And then we love the last paragraph of this letter, which conveniently says, as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary. How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium?
And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line, or continue to conduct the applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently active budget period. But here comes the problem. You know who is supplying the budget? An indefinite term, unlimited amount contract from DARPA and from NIH. Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out, when you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end?
And lest you think that I'm making an allegation, which I'm not, I'm making an accusation, let's be clear, and there's a big difference, I'm not alleging anything, they actually went to the trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan virus it was going to get us. As you see on the right hand side of the screen, published in 2016, March 14th of 2016, the SARS like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1, and I quote, is poised for human emergence. Does that sound like we're just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little haywire in December of 2019, or does it feel like we were told, look at Wuhan, and look at coronavirus, and look at what we've been doing to manipulate coronavirus in Wuhan and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, and lo and behold, we're gonna go ahead and tell you that we're ready to release it in 2016. Next slide. We're almost done.
And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed to do that. I happen to be, for the United States government, in the early part of 2000s, in the latter part of 90s, a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons. I'm acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological warfare agent is in the 18 US code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons.
And so my assessment is in fact professional and right. The reason for that is I'm the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many years. That's why I say it. But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a nut job. Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, so why don't we look at what the criminals said themselves, shall we?
In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation, Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into millions and billions of people's arms, that Ralph Barrick was sponsored to present the following, and let's go ahead and use his words, presentation, synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, bio warfare enabling technologies. Does that sound like a public health distribution program? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does biological warfare enabling technology sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness? It sounds to me like, biological warfare enabling technologies, and the reason why I have that hunch is what followed was he received, next to his NIAID grants, non competitive DARPA grants in matching funds for over $140,000,000 of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies.
So do I have a problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not because that's what they called it, and we know that they knew they called it that on September 18, 2019, because on September 18, 2019, the co conspiring cabal of interlocking directorates, also known as the World Health Organization, said that they were going to conduct an to experience for the world that it was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen. The lethality in that statement is the problem. They didn't say we're going to maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around. They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent.
And the stated reason, in September 2020, the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universal vaccine. Not we'll look at other options of treatment, not we'll have a look at what might be early intervention as doctor McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances. Not that we stated on September 18, 2019, we were intending to kill. And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion, no one would have accepted. And that's published by the criminal racketeers.
Next slide, and there's only 2 to go if you're following. To deploy and profit from it. We were told investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process, and lo and behold, guess what they saw? Profit at the end of the process. 2022, $100,000,000,000 for Pfizer, of public funds.
Moderna, after lying to the Congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID, where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation, they receive a back payment royalty of $400,000,000 for the first payment of the royalty. $400,000,000, more than any institute of health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention in the history of American medical research. And lo and behold, what do we receive after that? A request the World Health Organization to expand its budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it, and guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back.
That's what they did. Next, and now you get the final slide. This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional crime. This is a criminal act done by a criminal institution established to enable criminal behavior since its foundation in 1947.
That is what this is. And we should not be debating the merits of or liberty or anything else, as irrational as that would be if we stood at a bank robbery and debated the merits of printing dollar bills. The problem is not the dollar bills. It's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health, and it's not public health, and it's not the suppression of information, and the suppression of dissident views, and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world and academicians around the world who spoke out against this, that's not the crime.
The crime is that we had criminal racketeers who conspired and developed a, quote, emergency. The same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured, and did all agency capture to make sure that you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use, vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition, so we just used them. Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion, in violation of both European Union standards and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These were crimes. It was organized crime, and we should treat it as such.
Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath, and this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty, and most importantly, the death and destruction of the integrity of well meaning people who sit here today doing everything they can within their power to try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe. I will not, for a moment, denigrate the multiple contributions of amazing academic and medical professionals who've tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes, but I will, without doubt, say the following, until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers tiers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder, until we have that conversation, we're having the wrong conversation. Because we are not here to debate the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organization. We are here to end the criminal organization itself. This is my call to every single person on this planet.
Don't just limit the power of the Who. Destroy the Who. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: Thank you to all of our wonderful speakers this afternoon. Thank you To the audience, thank you. To the audience at home, please, share the information that you heard today
@Restitutor_ - Restitutor Orbis
@P_McCulloughMD @DrDMartinWorld @AndersonAfDMdEP @elonmusk @joerogan @PBDsPodcast @jordanbpeterson
@Restitutor_ - Restitutor Orbis
@P_McCulloughMD @DrDMartinWorld @AndersonAfDMdEP @elonmusk @joerogan @PBDsPodcast @jordanbpeterson @EvaVlaar @Cobratate @Nigel_Farage @glennbeck
reSee.it AI Summary
Check out @DrDMartinWorld's bone-chilling presentation exposing the WHO as a criminal organization. On September 13th, 2023, a panel provided evidence confirming Covid as a bioweapon. Don't miss this eye-opening revelation!
@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard
I strongly urge everyone who has not yet seen this recent bone-chilling presentation by @DrDMartinWorld do so immediately - And yes, he has the receipts. On September 13th, 2023, a panel bravely exposed the WHO (World Health Organization) for the criminal organization it is, and proved that Covid is indeed a bioweapon.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a public health crisis but a planned genocide orchestrated by the WHO and its collaborators. They highlight the funding, planning, creation, and profit from the pandemic as evidence of criminal activity. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and an end to their criminal actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity. And I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words.
Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit?
Well, I'm going to tell you since its formation in the 19 forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a soul and Singular intent. And I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation. This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand. And they use a 4 step process to execute cute every one of their nefarious plans.
They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do and then they deploy and profit from it. And in violation of 15 US Code Section 19, which for those of you listening, coincidentally started with the Clayton Act In the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States, 1913, the same year the World Health Organization's progenitors also started. So I Find it fascinating that we passed the Clayton Act in 1913 and we set in motion a 110 years ago the criminal conspiracy which we now called the World Health Organization a 110 years later. And in violation of TFEU or TEFEU. I don't know even how to say it.
The TFEU, the treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the Treaty for the Dysfunctional European cabal, article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that This was never a public health anything. It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behavior of a population. Period. That's what it was. That's what it always was.
And we can come up with every theoretical argument we wanna make about things. But the problem, even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something, is falsifiable for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance companies paid $30,000,000,000 less in claims. Now if there's a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus cunningly that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements, and whether you're paid up on your premiums, that's a big ask. It turns out that the data is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic, we had genocide, and we need to call call it what it is.
Next slide. When I say we planned it, let's make sure we understand Exactly the not so fine print of the fine print. And I want to call your attention first to the right Right hand column of the slide. This is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, PATH, and the Gates Foundation did on their wonderful Worldwide program for a malaria vaccine for children under the age of 6 months of age. And in their clinical trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the vaccine group And then cunningly used the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children.
Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because it's exactly what it was. Because it turns out that this Control group was not a saline injection. It was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing. It was actually a cocktail of for other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The control group was known to kill people, And the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe gonna kill people.
And what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all. And cunningly, under article 5, section 13, which I've put on this slide, I want you to understand why I said at its formation in 1947 when the WHO was funded and founded, it was funded been founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language. Section 13 of article 5 ends with the following statement, immunity from personal arrest or detention, blah blah blah, immunity from legal process of every kind. Now, if you didn't intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution and its worst, even investigation for prosecution of every kind. People sit there and pretend, well, that's like diplomatic immunity.
Do you realize this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity. This is a criminal organization who set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit. And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew it because their 1st director general, none other than doctor Rene Sand, who happened to be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau in 1940 earlier in 1947, mysteriously, with the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation, was nominated to become the 1st director general of The Who. And within 5 short years, Rene Dan decided to authorize the real purpose of the who in writing by then director general, doctor Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room?
This is not public health. This is the advancement of The same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy, philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie. People, stop Fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing, but we're not going to the root. This was an organized crime racketeering entity set up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies, and who gets any chance at life.
And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers, let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, if I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest of any organization, you might conclude that that risk that actually aggregates into a controlling interest. And It turns out that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single Organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitive's law in the United States. This is absolutely not only not an independent Charitably funded donation, but more importantly, under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, this constitutes directed Donations, which specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations.
When I say this is a crime, I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime, and now the crime of racketeering leading to murder and global terrorism. Next slide. I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it. And why don't we use the criminals' language in their own words? Because it's the best way to say it.
When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified with the model derived from coronavirus, they actually said the following. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, We need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding. There was no health crisis. This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry.
That's the crisis. And let's read on. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the global preparedness monitoring board of the World Health Organization. And it was the funding base for Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan. So don't tell me that we have to do an investigation into where this came from, the criminals have admitted to it in their own words. Next slide. And now we get the fun one that no one in Congress is willing to address, which is the elephant in the room.
On October 21, 2000 And in 14, despite the multiple conversations between senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci where we've been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put on the ropes. He has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left. And it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead Sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, which unambiguously states that during the gain of function moratorium, which By the way, if we use the word moratorium, feels like that means you're supposed to stop. Why don't we go ahead and look at 2 pieces of this letter? First, the 2nd bullet under project 1, which by the way was not part of the original grant.
This was to look at the novel functions of the virus The genesis in vivo. You know what that means? In living systems. The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models. But this grant was modified with this letter to say we were going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems.
And then we love the last paragraph of this letter, which conveniently says, as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary. How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium? And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line, or continue to conduct the applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently Active budget, period. But here comes the problem. You know who is supplying the budget?
An indefinite term, Limited amount contract from DARPA and from NIH. Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out, when you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end. And lest you think that I'm making an allegation, which I'm not. I'm making an accusation. Let's be clear.
And there's a big difference. I'm not alleging anything. They actually went to the trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan virus that was gonna get us. As you see on The right hand side of the screen. Published in 2016, March 14, 2016, the SARS like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One, and I quote, is poised for human emergence.
Does that sound like we're just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little haywire in December of 2019, or does it feel like we were told, look at Wuhan and look at coronavirus and look at what we've been doing to manipulate coronavirus was in Wuhan and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. And lo and behold, we're gonna go ahead and tell you that we're ready to release it in 2016. Next slide. We're almost done. And then they created it.
Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed to do that. I happen to be, for the United States government, in the early part of 2000s, in the latter part of the nineties, a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons. I'm acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological warfare agent is in the 18 US code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons. And so my assessment is, in fact, professional and right.
And the reason for That is I'm the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many years. That's why I say it. But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a nut job. Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. So why don't we look at what the criminals said themselves, shall we?
In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation. Ralph Baric, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into millions and billions of people's arms. That Ralph Baric was sponsored to present the following, and let's go ahead and use his words, presentation. Synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biowarfare enabling technologies. Does that sound like a public health distribution program?
Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does biological warfare Enabling technologies sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness. It sounds to me like biological warfare enabling technologies. And the reason why I have that hunch is what followed was he received, next to his NIAID grants, noncompetitive DARPA grants in matching funds for over $140,000,000 of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on get funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies. So do I have a Problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology?
Absolutely not, because that's what they called it. And we know that they knew they called it that on September 18, 2019. Because on September 18th 2019, the racketeering, coke conspiring cabal of interlocking directorates, also known as The World Health Organization said that they were going to conduct an expert experience for the world that was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen. The lethality in that statement is the problem. They didn't say we're gonna They didn't say we're gonna maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around.
They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason, in September 2020, the progress indicator is that the cater, is that the world would accept a universal vaccine. Not, we'll look at other options of treatment. Not we'll have a look at what might be early intervention as doctor McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances. Not that, we stated on September 18, 2019, we were intending to kill.
And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion, no one would have accepted. And that's published by the Criminal Racketeers. Next slide. And there's only 2 to go if you're following. Deploy and profit from it.
We were told investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. And lo and behold, guess what they saw? Profit at the end of the process. 2022, $100,000,000,000 for Pfizer of public funds. Moderna, after After lying to the congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID, where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation, they receive a back payment royalty of $400,000,000 for the first payment of the royalty.
$400,000,000, more than any Institute of Health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention in the history of American medical research. And lo and behold, what do we receive after that? A request from the World World Health Organization to expand its budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it. And guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back.
That's what they did. Next, and now you get the final slide. This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional crime. This is a criminal Act done by a criminal institution established to enable criminal behavior since its foundation in 1947.
That is what this is. And we should not be debating the merits of democracy or liberty or anything else, as irrational as that would be if we stood at a bank robbery and debated The merits of printing dollar bills. The problem is not the dollar bills. It's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health, and it's not public health, and it's not the suppression of information and the suppression of dissident views, and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world and academicians around the world who spoke out against this.
That's not the crime. The crime is that we had criminal racketeers who can spot conspired inspired and developed a, quote, emergency, the same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured, and did all agency to capture to make sure that you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use, vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition, so we just used them. Criminal racketeers price Fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion in violation of both European Union standards and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These were crimes. It was organized crime, and we should treat it as such.
Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath, and this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty and, most importantly, the death and destruction of the integrity of well meaning people who sit here today doing they can within their power to try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe. I will not, for a moment, denigrate the multiple contributions of amazing academic and medical professionals who've tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes, but I will, without doubt, say the following. Until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder. Until we have that Conversation. We're having the wrong conversation because we are not here to debate the merits of a Modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organization.
We are here to end the criminal organization itself. This is my call to every single person on this planet. Don't just limit the power of the who. Destroy the who.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
"Dr" Bill Gates on how to prevent the next pandemic https://t.co/qlFxOm0Csh
Video Transcript AI Summary
We should not return to our complacency about pandemics. In the future, we can have mega testing platforms that are quick, inexpensive, and can test 20% of the population weekly. Monoclonal antibodies are a promising treatment that can reduce death rates by 80%. The development of new vaccines will be faster, easier, and cheaper thanks to the mRNA platform. To prevent future pandemics, we need a global alert system and a group of infectious disease responders who can act quickly. This investment is like the best insurance policy the world could buy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We all want a return to the way things were before COVID nineteen, but there's 1 area where I hope we never go back, our complacency about pandemics. We can get ahead of infectious disease outbreaks. By the next pandemic, I believe we can have what I call mega testing diagnostic platforms, they can be deployed quickly, cost very little and test is 20% of the entire population every week. We also want to get treatments out far faster next time. One of the most promising, is monoclonal antibodies.
These manufactured antibodies grab onto the virus and disable it just like your immune system, can reduce death rates by as much as 80%. I also think that we'll develop new vaccines quickly. In large part due to this new mRNA platform, mRNA will become faster to develop, easier to store and lower costs, that's a huge breakthrough. To stop future pandemics quickly, we need to be able to spot disease outbreaks as soon as they happen anywhere in the world, and that requires a global alert system. If there turns out to be some new infectious pathogen, then we need a group of infectious disease responders to spring into action.
Think of these as like pandemic firefighters. They're gonna use their logistics, use their ability to build up capacity quickly. They're gonna go wherever that problem is stopping the next pandemic will require a big investment, but I think of this as the best insurance policy the world could buy. You can read more about this in our annual
reSee.it AI Summary
The rising concerns over depopulation are linked to the World Economic Forum's initiatives, raising questions about their global agendas. Whistle-blower Barry Young suggests a potential connection between Covid vaccines and increased mortality, prompting an investigation. Comparisons to Nazi ideology highlight the dangers of elitism in globalism. The devaluation of human life and disregard for ethics are reminiscent of the Nazis. We must challenge elitist notions and prioritize empathy and ethics in population and resource challenges. The infiltration of globalist groups into governments threatens sovereignty and democratic principles. Concentrated power in global entities undermines local needs and voices. The World Economic Forum's influence raises concerns about undemocratic decision-making.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Are the elitists really looking to reduce the Global population by 6 Billion people? Beyond Boundaries: The Perilous Intersection of Global Elitism and Population Control. The rising concerns about the ideology of depopulation are increasingly linked to the World Economic Forum's (WEF) initiatives, sparking debates over the implications of their global agendas and the potential impact on world population dynamics. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/LarryTaunton/status/1732037113254707512?s=20 In response to alarming revelations emerging from New Zealand, whistle-blower Barry Young has brought to light information that suggests a potentially disturbing connection between the Covid Vaccines and an unprecedented increase in all-cause mortality and excess deaths. This revelation raises urgent questions about the possibility of a sinister agenda by certain global entities. Could there be an intentional effort to significantly reduce the world's population under the guise of public health measures? Such a scenario necessitates a thorough and unbiased investigation into the implications of these findings and their potential global impact. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731365553632055464?s=20 As we navigate the complex and often murky waters of the global population control debate, it's crucial to contextualize this discussion within the broader historical narrative, particularly the chilling parallels with the ideologies espoused by the Nazis. This comparison not only highlights the dangers of elitist attitudes in modern globalism but also serves as a stark reminder of humanity's potential for darkness. The notion of population control, as advocated by figures like Dr. Dennis Meadows, who desires a peaceful and equitable reduction, superficially appears humane. Yet, beneath the surface of these propositions, there lurks a shadow of elitism, reminiscent of the most sinister chapters in human history. Meadows' statement, "I hope that population can be reduced peacefully, in a fair way that everyone can participate in the experience," though seemingly benign, inadvertently echoes a mindset that can quickly spiral into dangerous territory. This is where the haunting specter of Nazi ideology becomes relevant. The Nazis, driven by a perverted sense of elitism and superiority, embarked on one of the most horrific genocides in history, systematically exterminating millions whom they deemed 'unworthy' or 'inferior.' Their actions were underpinned by a chilling belief in racial purity and a deluded view of social engineering, which they believed would lead to an improved human race. The parallels between this and the contemporary rhetoric of elitism in globalist circles, where certain individuals deem themselves fit to decide the fate of populations, are unnervingly clear. Attempts to silence whistle-blower Barry Young.⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731632653290344862?s=20 The psychology behind such elitist views, whether in the context of Nazi Germany or modern globalism, reveals a disturbing willingness to devalue human life. This mindset, which reduces individuals to mere variables in a demographic equation, is dangerously akin to the dehumanizing policies of the Nazis. It reflects a lack of empathy and a disregard for the sanctity of human life, where people are categorized and valued based on arbitrary criteria set by a self-proclaimed elite. The moral implications of drawing parallels between the elitism in globalism and Nazi ideology are profound. They force us to confront uncomfortable truths about human nature and the ease with which a sense of superiority can lead to the justification of atrocities. This historical context serves as a warning of the potential consequences when extreme views on population control are allowed to go unchecked. Moving forward, it is essential to challenge the elitist notions within globalist agendas, advocating for an approach to population and resource challenges that respects human dignity and rights. Solutions must be grounded in empathy and ethics, not in cold calculations or the arrogant presumption of a select few. The lessons from history, especially the horrors perpetrated by the Nazis, must inform our approach, ensuring that respect for every human life remains at the forefront of our global discourse. Why did Jacinda Ardern exempt 11,000 politicians and doctors from getting the vaccine in secret?⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709827142148628638?s=20 We must not forget the involvement in one of the most influential Globalist movements namely the World Economic Forum led by Chairman Klaus Schwab. The infiltration of globalist groups into national governments poses significant risks, fundamentally threatening the sovereignty and democratic principles of nations. Such a scenario can lead to the erosion of local governance and the prioritization of international agendas over national interests. This shift of power can dilute the voices and needs of local populations, as policies are increasingly influenced by a global elite with their own set of priorities and objectives. Moreover, the concentration of power in the hands of a few global entities increases the risk of unchecked, undemocratic decision-making, potentially leading to policies that are not in the best interest of the citizens they are meant to serve. This not only undermines democratic values but also jeopardizes the cultural, social, and economic well-being of nations, creating a global landscape where the diversity of local needs and voices are overshadowed by a homogenized global agenda. Is the World Economic Forum a dangerous death cult?⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709159686325367167?s=20 #DepopulationAgenda #WEF2030Agenda #NewZealand #CovidVaccinations #VaccineInjuries #ExcessDeaths #Myocarditus #SuddenDeath #DiedSuddenly #JacindaArdern #KlausSchwab
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Barry Young: The Whistle-blower Who Stood Up for Transparency and Public Health Barry Young, a former employee of Te Whatu Ora, took a courageous stand. Disheartened by what he perceives as critical flaws in the national vaccination program, Young decided to act. He accessed…
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
#JacindaArdern former Prime Minister of #NewZealand pushed the vax like a cheap city block drug pusher while telling everyone that the Government was the only true source of information. However evidence has emerged that she and her Government decided they were exempt from…
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Is the World Economic Forum a Cult. The command and control of members of the World Economic Forum by sole Chairman #Klaus Schwab is increasingly being likened to that of a #Cult leader. Unelected Schwab has groomed young people and assisted by other powerful fellow cult…
@FredDiBiase247 - 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝗕𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗲 ①
There’s only one disease. They didn’t want us to know this.. Must Watch👇🏽👇🏽 https://t.co/Hb8oECDTPa
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a debate about whether there is only one disease or multiple diseases. The speaker argues that there is only one disease and gives examples to support this claim. They mention sinusitis, bronchitis, and pneumonia, stating that mucus is the common factor in all these conditions. When asked about AIDS, the speaker says that mucus is also involved in this disease. They emphasize that mucus can be found in the skin, blood, and lymphatic system, which are all part of the immune system. The speaker addresses Doctor Victor Herbert, who questions their theory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What did you say? I said, your honor, there's only 1 disease. Not 2, not 3, 1. The judge said, what is it? I said, you already know.
She said, try me. I said, runner, when someone had sinusitis, what is obstructing the nasal passage? She said mucus. And when another has bronchitis, what is subjected to bronchodil? She said mucus.
And when another has pneumonia, was covering the cells of the of the lungs. She said mucus. Doctor Victor Herbert jumped up and said, What about AIDS? You and your 1 disease theory? I said, runner, this doctor said that I believe in a theory.
I am the last individual on earth that could believe in a theory. I do not lend my set of theories of philosophy. Either I know or I don't know. Said, rather, have you been to an AIDS war? She said yes.
I said, what is it that the AIDS picks up the reply? I mean, he said mucus. Where is the mucus? It's in the skin. It's in the blood and the lymphatic system that makes the immunological system.
That is where you find the mucus, mister Victor Herbert.
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
The Davos Magicians at the World Economic Forum conveniently have the pre-knowledge of ‘Disease X’. Dr. John Campbell explains that this ‘Disease X’ doesn’t exist in any Medical Textbooks…but yet it appears on the WEF’s website. https://t.co/QOnKve6JXD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a website called DiseaseX on the World Economic Forum site. They express surprise at not having heard of this disease before and not finding it in various medical textbooks. The speaker highlights the need for global collaboration and funding to improve pandemic preparedness and mentions the possibility of producing something, possibly a vaccine, to target a novel virus before it emerges. They mention a deleted video about a virus that caused brain disease in mice and emphasize the potential for viruses to spillover from animals to humans. The speaker suggests that research on vaccine development for known viral families could give humanity an advantage against future diseases. They express concern about DiseaseX and hope that the World Economic Forum doesn't know more than they do.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I wanna talk now about disease x, which is on this website here. This is the World Economic Forum site as far as I can derive. DiseaseX, this is how we should prepare for the next big virus. Wow. So, this you can listen to it here or you can, read it there.
It's all very easy to understand while being rather difficult to understand. Now disease X, I've been teaching this sort of thing pretty well full time since 1990. I know I've been a clinical nurse since 1975 when I was a 1st year student. And, I've never heard of this disease x. So I looked at some of my books because when I wrote my book, I couldn't remember putting it in.
So it wasn't in there, I could easily miss it, couldn't I? So I did check-in Ruben's pathology. These are the definitive texts. Couldn't see it in there either. So I checked in Gurneyton and Hore, superb physiology, but not in there either.
Porth's Pathophysiology. Not in there either. It's fairly thick book. You think it could be in there somewhere. You get the idea, not in that one.
I can hardly pick this one up. Physiology. All these standard textbooks, slot in there. So it must be a new disease. Can't say I like the sound of a new disease.
We've had a new disease already, haven't we? Anyway, this is just I want to give you some highlights from the radio Davos talk. Disease X is looming. The world needs to be better prepared to tackle a future pandemic. And you'll see here that the text is from the World Economic Forum site.
They go on to say, by mapping viruses with the potential to become the next disease X, the global health community and governments the governments and governments can be more responsive the next time a pandemic looms. Looks like they're anticipating another pandemic here. The global collaboration and adequate funding are needed to improve pandemic preparedness and ensure fast action to keep a viral outbreak at bay. It says you can get a long way being able to produce something. I'm not quite sure what's being produced, but you can produce something or other something or other that will target a novel virus before that virus even emerges.
I assume here they're preparing to repurposed drugs, which could be rolled out very quickly and very cheaply and maybe efficacious against a range of conditions. Maybe that's what we mean. But anyway, they're going to produce something. Can't read too much into that. All they say is something.
Could even mean a vaccine. I don't know. Whatever they mean there. Anyway, that will target a novel virus before that virus even emerges. It's a virus we don't know yet, but we do know it's out there.
Do we? But we do know it's out there. Now unfortunately, much to my annoyance and your annoyance, I felt compelled to delete yesterday's video. My apologies. The the the the trick is to live to fight another day.
That's what what we aim for. But the video I was doing yesterday was examining a particular virus, that was experimentally used to infect mice, caused the disease of the brain and at the at the end of the study, none of the mice at the end of the study, we're alive anymore. None of them are alive anymore, because a certain event had happened to them that made them Not Alive. And that virus, my understanding from reading of the paper, was it had been it evolved in cell cultures in a laboratory. So as a result of going through cell cultures in a laboratory, the function of the virus had been, had been increased.
It would appear it became a more functional virus. There was a function and, there was potentially an increase, maybe even a gain. Anyway but but, we know it's out there. So they know it's out there. Obviously, they don't have precise geographical location, but they know it's out there.
And we know it has the potential to spillover from animal populations potentially into humans. Well, yes, there can be natural spillover events, of course. There can also be other origins of viruses, perhaps mutate or adapt itself and then begin spreading and killing people faster than we can contain it. Carrying out research and on vaccine development carrying out research on vaccine development for known viral families could impact humans, of which there were 25 viral families the same, would give humanity a decided advantage over the next disease X. So so who knows maybe the World Economic Forum will be good enough to develop a vaccine for us great on wash.
So it's all ready for us. I'll leave it with you. Read the article for yourself. It's all there. All there.
Yep. On Radio Davos. Quite concerning really, a disease x. They seem to think it's coming. Let's hope they don't know too much more than us.
We'll leave it there.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
The Davos group starts meeting in just a couple of days and what is front and center on their agenda? Disease X. https://t.co/IabIoRQ1TS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Davos group, the official mouthpiece of the UN, is meeting in Switzerland. Disease X, a synthetic virus created in a lab, is their main focus. They claim it will be deadlier than COVID-19. The media, UN, Bill Gates, and the New World Order are promoting the imminent release of this virus. The previous COVID-19 virus was also lab-made and used to roll out new DNA-reprogramming vaccines. Disease X refers to the manipulation of viruses to make them more dangerous and transmissible. The government has experimented with humanized mice, resulting in a 100% kill rate. Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab have openly discussed the upcoming virus. Censorship is increasing, with popular online doctor John Campbell being silenced. The UN is pushing for a treaty as this unfolds. Alex Jones' New World Order Wars game is available on Steam and is highly rated. It supports the Info War and the fight against the deep state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Davos group starts meeting in just a couple days. They've already got their operation going on a mountain top, so their staff and crew and people are already getting there in Switzerland. But they are the official mouthpiece of the UN, and last year, officially merged with the UN at a National Security Council level. They're not on the National Security Council, but the UN secretary general said, Policy will be decided on with them. And remember what Klaus Schwab says, we penetrates half the cabinets.
We control half the governments of the world. And what is front and center on their agenda? Number 1, They say disease x is imminent, and it's gonna kill 20 times what COVID supposedly did, and then they give a number of 50,000,000. Now what is disease x? That's a name for a disease never existed.
And if you talk to the virologists, the experts, they say that's not known for 100 of years. And most of the diseases that they have Recently found, they find later in bodies they dig up existed before, and it's very rare to find a new disease. So when you hear disease x, they mean the laboratory made synthetic viruses gain of function operations. So now they are in a crescendo with corporate media, the UN, the WUF, Bill Gates, the new world order saying that the release of a new virus is imminent, and it's going to happen. Now they did this just months before they released COVID nineteen that was made in the lab, That was 5 viruses combined that did cause respiratory illnesses.
We didn't have enough vitamin d, but they made it synthetic so they could own The vaccine response that they'd already made, and that all came out later. We'll be going over it again tonight. We have experts throughout the week joining us. But the Indian scanned it. Others scanned it with their $1,000,000,000 CRISPR machines and said back in February of 2020, This was made in a lab, and the media tried to pooh pooh, but later admitted, no.
It was made in a lab. Not out of some bat cave or some some wet market grocery store where they sell live animals. Didn't come from a turtle or a bat or anything or a porcupine. So they're running the same propaganda they ran, but even more intensely before they released it last time. And Fauci bragged, Trump will soon be challenged by a novel virus.
They said we're gonna blow up the old regulatory system of actually testing things. And once this new virus comes out, he said in 2018 and 19, we will use it to then roll out all these new Franken shots that aren't even classical vaccines that are DNA reprogramming systems. We pointed that out 4 years ago. That's what it was. They said, no.
You're lying. Now I've got newscast with the UN, with the WHO saying, yes. We're now gonna change your DNA with these new shots. There'll be no approval. We're just gonna make you take it.
They have legislation introduced to the congress for quote disease x. So When you hear disease x, that means the gain of function, the manipulation of viruses, splicing different families of viruses together, Taking viruses that are only in animals and making where they can jump into humans. Making where they're more airborne, where they're more communicable. There's been very little corporate media coverage of the hearings the last few years of Fauci admitting all of this is going on, trying to deny its gain of function, but saying, yeah, we soup up viruses. Now I just put an image on screen from the early 19 nineties.
That's real video. If you're a TV viewer, it's a mouse with a giant human ear growing on its back, a third the size of its whole body. Now That was done in the seventies, declassified in 1990. I've covered that mouse story probably 400 times or more. Probably 500 times.
The reason that's important is now listen to me carefully. We're about to do the deep dive on disease x. They took humanized mice, the US government, the Chinese government, the Australian government, the British government. This is all admitted. Put human genes into them so they respond just like humans.
So it's like you're testing on a human, same effect, and have got a 100% kill rate with the viruses they've cooked up. So when you see Bill Gates laughing and smirking and saying, Look. If you didn't like COVID, something a lot worse is coming, and you'll stay locked down. You'll behave yourself when the new virus comes. We have Klaus Schwab saying this.
We have his daughter who's on the board of the WEF. We've got her saying it. I've got The receipts overhead shot. You see these 3 stacks right here? Excuse me.
Four stacks? There's his daughter saying it. I got Klaus Schwab saying it too right there in that stack. Look at all these other stacks, and guess who else I have. I have undoubtedly the most popular, loved, online doctor in the world.
He gets Hundreds of millions of views a week, and until now they weren't censoring them. Now they are. They took this video off YouTube. Doctor John Campbell out of the UK, Very respected. And he basically comes out.
Well, he didn't come out, but he came out and said, clearly, they're engineering this. Clearly, they're releasing it to take control of society. It's all illegal. It's gain of function. And when you hear disease x, they're talking about diseases that don't exist because they are making them, ladies and gentlemen.
And the w f says prepare its imminent. It's all about to happen right as the UN tries to ram through their treaty. Ladies and gentlemen, it's happening. 2 years in the making, and we didn't plan it like this because we didn't know to release Alex Jones New World Order Wars. That's all about fighting Epstein And Clinton and Hillary and the deep state and the pito rings.
Whole levels just dealing with that because that's truth is how they operate. And now the game went on Steam. The biggest online platform of video games in the world. A 150,000,000 users a week, and it already shot to number 1. So find the link to steam at alexjonesgame.com or search Alex Jones New World Order Wars at steam And get it for yourself.
It's got an incredible 97% reviews. We'll put the link to steam on screen and to Alex Jones game .com. Get it. We are taking back the culture. We are taking things back.
This will fund the info war going into the election the next 10 months. The only way he fails me. Don't take action. Get New World Order Wars by Alex Jones
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
KLAUS SCHWAB OPENING STATEMENT DAVOS 2024 These are the people who believe they know what's best for you and your families. They have taken it upon themselves to shape the future of the world to fit their liking. Anyone who attended Davos is an enemy of all free persons. https://t.co/5krX043BHb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today, at the World Economic Forum, we face diverse and profound challenges. Our world is more interconnected yet more divided than ever. We struggle with sluggish economic growth and inclusiveness is in doubt. Climate change poses relentless challenges. Innovation brings opportunities but also risks. These transformative challenges lead to uncertainty and fear. We must rediscover a narrative of trust and stewardship for a better future. Our actions today have consequences for tomorrow. Trust requires collaboration, sustainability, and empathy. As leaders, we have a responsibility to contribute significantly. The World Economic Forum is not just a meeting, but a year-long engagement. Trust is vital for cooperation and functioning institutions. We must rebuild trust by exercising our trusteeship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Madam president, dear constituents of the World Economic Forum, dear friends, today we stand really at the unique juncture in human history, facing challenges that are as diverse as they are profound. The special role of the World Economic Forum is not to look just at 1 single issue. It is a place we are at the beginning of the year. We come together to analyze the state of the world in a systemic and strategic way and hopefully to find common ground to generate positive impact. Geopolitically, our world as my friend and colleague said Geopolitically our world is more interconnected yet paradoxically more divided and fragmented than ever.
Economically, we grapple with sluggish growth. Severity fabric of our societies is inclusiveness which is in doubt. Environmentally, we confront relentless challenges of climate change, a threat to our planets delicate and technologically we navigate uncharted waters innovation offers boundless opportunities but also unprecedented risks. So steeply transformative challenges which are actually the cornerstone of our program lead to uncertainty, generalized fear and pessimism. The of long term strategic and sustainable solutions.
This reactionary approach undermines our collective face in the future at and here, we losing the face of our future. We risk to become much more eco centered and on a national and individual level. To the the and most importantly, trust in each other. Trust is not just a feeling. Trust is a commitment to action, to believe, to hope.
To achieve this, we must rediscover and embrace a narrative surpassed human humanity since its inception acting as trustees for a better future. It is about stewardship, about preserving and enhancing our world for current and future generation, it is about understanding that our actions today have far reaching reaching consequences tomorrow, the concept of trust and compels us to think beyond all those and beyond our lifetimes, it encourages collaboration over competition, sustainability over expediency and empathy over a. As trustees of the future, we are responsible for advancing a world which is richer in possibilities, more equitable in opportunities and more secure in its foundations. Moreover, as leaders in government, business and society, we bear a particular responsibility to the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum is not a collective decision making body, but its impact stems from the new insights gained through dialogue and interaction and more importantly from the commitments made by each participant to contribute more significantly in the United States. The cornerstone of our program are actually our more than 100 initiatives.
Those initiatives are embedded into work programs bringing together governments, business and civil society and best experts throughout the year. For this annual meeting while see vibrant atmosphere surrounding our gathering is a testament to its global significance. It is essential said we focus on our mission committed to improving the state of the world by engaging into those action oriented initiatives. So World Economic Forum is not just troubles. It's an engagement throughout the year.
In conclusion, trust is a fundamental pillar of our social, economic and political lies. It is vital for cooperation, social cohesion and effectively functioning institutions. To rebuild trust, there is a fundamental need to the this annual meeting to rebuild trust by exercising our trusteeship and thank you.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Alex Jones Breaks Down Globalist Plan to Launch #DiseaseX to Install World Government https://t.co/6P4l5FVGPG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential threat of a new strain of bird flu that has already killed over 100 people. They highlight that previous bird flu strains were less deadly, with a mortality rate of 1%, 3%, 6%, and 9%, while this new strain has a mortality rate of 38.3%. The speaker suggests that this could be a bioweapon released by globalists to reduce the world population and bring about a global government. They emphasize the need to be prepared and listen to their warnings. The speaker concludes by urging listeners to visit Infowars for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I predicted live on air that the UN would use a virus scare to bring in draconian controls and planetary systems to dominate every facet of our lives. This video has been censored literally thousands of times on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google. But now thanks to Elon Musk, you can see it here and share it uncensored. You are receiving this transmission. You are the resistance.
Speaker 1: We have been following very closely For several years, disease x that the UN World Health Organization has predicted could wipe out humanity. Now there's a spectrum of disease x type pathogens in the virus family that they would call a disease x. Mainly the bird flu variety, the mousepox variety, and also what would be known as airborne Ebola. I have 4 children. I love my family.
I have studied history in great detail, and I understand how big a threat this is. Now Zero Hedge has an incredibly important article that's a boil down from the World Health Organization and just mentions and blurbs out of the Chinese news that they're basically keeping quiet. And the story is also posted in full to infowars.com that a new strain of bird flu that kills 40% of humans that contracted it Just showed up this week and has already killed a 100 people plus, and that's old news. Previous bird flus that they thought were incredibly deadly only killed 1% then 3% then 6%. The last one was 9%.
Remember decades ago when they were worried it might go airborne. We have a graphic from the UN showing that it is now airborne. This is so incredible, ladies and gentlemen, because this should be the top news story in the world. Regular flu, it's estimated, even with compromised immune systems, might kill 1% of people that come in contact with it. The influenza plague that hit during World War one was estimated to kill around 10% of people that came in contact with it.
And the estimates are a 100 to a 150,000,000 to 200,000,000 because good records weren't kept. It's at least a 100,000,000 people With a flu that killed around 11%. This kills 38.3% according to the UN. They've rounded up to 40%, and it's exponentially getting more deadly in these giant factory farms in China. And if you look at the graphic and put it back on there from the UN, You can get it from the air, from foul, you ducks, chicken, manure, feces, or you can get it from particulate and the virus in the air through your nose or by touching it to your mouth.
It's extremely airborne, eyes, nose, or mouth. So understand something, ladies and gentlemen. There's all sorts of new viral strains that are drug resistant bacterial strains. We know one of the biggest causes of death in the world now is flushing bacteria. There's hundreds of different types that are, basically immune to antibiotics.
I had 3 family members die in a month a few years ago of a drug resistant pneumonia virus. And so there is no treatment for this. I've got the detailed report on infowars.com. This is from the UN themselves. This is sin sationally bad.
Now remember about a decade ago, our own Pentagon And the CDC put out the blueprint via the UN for the mousepox that kills 99 scent of mice that come in contact with it. And with a few genetic changes, it can be made to be airborne for humans and kill 99% of humans. It is seen as the most deadly potential because it's already at 99%. I'm gonna explain that again. 99% of people that get a human variant mousepox die a horrible death.
This is 38 Point 3. This is an emergency, folks. Because if we don't treat like an emergency, no one will know what's going on, and then it's just something in the background. We don't get ready for it. Now here's the big news.
Let's put up, AP, Reuters, The Sun, others reported this. We first reported this, a decade ago, but even this year, global pandemic, mystery disease could wipe out humanity, top scientists warn. I'm not gonna go that far in my headline. I'm saying if it kills 40% of people And we're 7 a half 1000000000 people currently. That's over 3,000,000,000 people.
It's upwards of 4,000,000,000. So 3 to 40000000 people would die If the entire planet contracted this, and look at the graph, 1%, 3%, 6%, and and suddenly, 9%. It makes a leap to 38.3. 38.3. Now what did I and doctor Groupe and others and doctor Blaylock who's a, brain surgeon, what have we talked about in the past here on the air?
That the globalist have said in their white papers, in their own UN documents that they want to create race specific bioweapons and other systems to depopulate the planet. They teach that everywhere that the world without humans will be great. We need to depopulate. China's been the center of one child policy, all of this, and that it would be good to call the planet. We've seen Ian Fleming, m I six, write books about Moonraker, know, back in the sixties, they made the movie in the eighties, about, you know, billionaire globalist releasing bioweapons to reduce population.
That's art imitating life. You got Oprah Winfrey and Ted Turner and all the globalist meeting in in the news saying they wanna forcibly reduce world population. The fact that this is jumping and mutating so quick, and the fact that they just came out early this year and said we believe the disease x is about to show up and start wiping people out, get ready for it. And the fact that all over the world, they're beefing up border security in Europe and other areas. A lot of this from my sources is that they're preparing to release bioweapons claim that they're naturally, occurring and then use that as the cover for civil emergency societal control crackdowns on free speech.
Obama put the Internet kill switch in 5 years ago. And when he got confronted by it by congress, he said, well, it's in case the bird flu or SARS gets out. Just type that in. CDC says Internet kill switch is in case bird flu or SARS breaks out, and they have to control panic and direct every website in the US to one government announcement. That's Associated Press.
Look it up. So now we see this coming into focus. They Say, oh, we think disease x is about to show up. And you just saw Bill Maher a week ago say he hopes there's a total stock market crash, Not a recession. A total stock market crash to stop America and Trump.
Now that's a globalist minion. Says crash the economy, crash the stock market. There's the quotes. Watch the video. See it for yourself if you missed it.
Imagine Imagine, ladies and gentlemen, what they will be able to pull off during a global meltdown, a global collapse, and during billions of people dying, millions people dying, it'll look like a zombie invasion. Humans after 10 days and no food or water act like totally insane people and murder and kill and just eat raw flesh off the ground. Look at Venezuela. And they're training the military for mass waves of zombie attacks, so the people don't ask, well, wait. You're trained to machine gun whole crowds people.
They go, oh, it's just a it's just a game. We're training to mow down zombies. No. Giant hordes of out of control people act like this, And we've been designated as zombies for the zombie apocalypse. In World War z, the bioplague breaks out in China.
They've been preprogramming you so you accept this and follow their Hollywood directives when it all happens. I'm not saying it's about to happen imminently, but they're certainly gearing up for it and pushing it. And you got Dick Cheney talking about in rebuilding America's defenses in 2000 in PNAC about using bioweapons to wipe out certain racial groups. Believe me, this is going on. This is historical fact.
So I don't need all the little cutesy podcasters out there saying, oh, Jones has gone too far again. You go along with the system out there because you don't wanna be censored and blocked. A sign of my success and how real I am is that we are censored and blocked and every thinking person knows it. So I just wanna survive. I want my kids to survive.
I want you to survive. We have a global elite with a history of saying they wanna release bioweapons to reduce our population. Now we got stuff showing up that's evolving and mutating so fast. It's tailor made to be manipulated and and a bioweapon. And you've got the globalist willing to have a global depression to stop Trump and the resurgence of nationalism and capitalism to block their global government that they could do anything.
And we looked at every angle and believe a bioweapon release could be the thing they'd release to bring in a world government to counter a global problem, and the UN has said that a global pandemic is the only thing that may save their world government. Look it all up. Ignore me at your own peril. I'm the producer of Endgame that documents everything word for word with Elon Musk is now saying 11 years later. If you wanna survive and you wanna beat these globalists and these modern day Nazis, you better listen.
If you love your kids, you better listen. And I'm talking to Joe Rogan and everybody else. You don't listen to me. I hope you got a big bunker or an offshore base because the plague's coming. It may not be this year, but this is the globalist plan.
I'm Alex Jones. You have been warned.
Speaker 2: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you The truth about what's happening next. Visit infowars.comforward/show and share the link today.
reSee.it AI Summary
The World Economic Forum's 2024 discussion on "Preparing for Disease X" highlights the possibility of future pandemics similar to COVID-19. The Director General of the World Health Organization suggests that COVID-19 could be considered the first Disease X. Additionally, a book associated with the discussion features a foreword by Tony Blair.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Watch and Listen Carefully The World Economic Forum’s 2024 Discussion “Preparing For Disease X” “You may even call COVID the first Disease X and it may happen again” - Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General World Health Organization
Video Transcript AI Summary
The panel discussion focused on the importance of preparedness in health systems for future crises. The speakers emphasized the need for global collaboration and participation to strengthen health systems. Key priorities identified included early warning systems, preparedness planning, and the expansion of health infrastructure. The speakers also highlighted the importance of primary healthcare, research and development, and community involvement in preparedness efforts. The role of technology, data management, and artificial intelligence in improving healthcare delivery and response was also discussed. The panelists emphasized the need for partnerships, equitable access to healthcare, and the integration of digital health systems. The discussion concluded with a call for investment in health systems and the promotion of sustainable improvements in healthcare worldwide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All so much for attending this very important discussion, and I appreciate your opening comments. I have the highest regard for the Center For Health and Health Care and the work that only the World Economic Forum can do to bring all of the actors together to address really important issues. I had the honor of serving as the Chair of the Health and Health Care Governors, during January 2020's meeting when we first were planning for what we then know, of course, was a global pandemic. And I admired then and I continue to admire now how of the World Economic Forum thinks ahead. And so as Shyam said, the goal of our discussion today is to really talk about what can we and should we be doing to make sure our health systems are prepared for any future crisis that might come along that requires global collaboration and participation.
And how can we be sure that we learn from the past to strengthen systems for the future? And that will be the goal of our session today. We do have a very esteemed panel of experts here that I'm honored to introduce. And in introducing each of them, I'm going to ask them to give some opening comments as well about the key components very briefly that they each of them believe health systems should prioritize for an effective response to a potential crisis. And of course, it's our honor always to have Doctor.
Tedros, with us, the Director General of the World Health Organization. And Doctor. Tedros, may I ask you to answer that very simple to start with? Thank you.
Speaker 1: Can you rephrase maybe the question?
Speaker 0: Yes, of course. At the highest level, systems should prioritize for an effective response to a potential crisis?
Speaker 1: Yes. I think that's A big question. But I would like to start with especially the disease X. It's attracting a lot of attention, And I hope you have seen in the social media, but it's not a new idea. The first time we used the terminology was in 20 18.
The discussions were in 2017. I was just new director general. As you know, we annually list the emerging diseases. And MERS could be 1, Zika, Ebola, those we know. But then we said there are things that are unknown that may happen, and anything happening is a matter of when, not if.
So we need to have a placeholder for that, for the disease we don't know. That may come. And that was when we gave the name DISEZ X. So DISE X is a placeholder for unknown This is. I just wanted to start by clarifying that because there is already a lot of attention.
If I may, although COVID came immediately, we were preparing for COVID like disease. You you may even call COVID as the first disease x, And it may happen again. Of course, there are some people who say, oh, this may create panic. No. It's better actually to anticipate something that may happen because it has happened in our history many times and prepare for it.
We shouldn't face things unprepared. We can prepare for some unknown things as well Because there are basic things you can do. Then that takes me to your question, of course. Then we should prepare means It could be an early warning system that could be installed. And then preparedness planning.
For instance, With COVID, we have seen it in prepared planning when our hospitals were stretched beyond their capacity, but Both in terms of space and also workforce. How can you have a surge when anything comes you can expand quickly So you can manage your patients. We lost many people because we couldn't manage them. They could have been saved, but there was no space. There was no enough oxygen.
So how can you have a system that can expand when the need comes? This whatever disease, you you you should prepare for it. You don't need to know that disease. There are common factors in terms of supply chain, for instance. The same.
So whether it's in health systems or even the private sector, by the way, in research and development for ministers, you can prepare for it. Actually, it started with this disease x issue with research and development blueprint. It's a blueprint. And research and development should be at the center also to test drugs, to test Other other other other tools. And then, of course, The health infrastructure, I said it a bit, but the health infrastructure is bigger than what I said, the oxygen and the space.
So preparing that in in all its forms, especially with a focus on primary health care. High income countries were surprised because their investments in the last many decades was on high Take technology, high you know, cutting edge technology in tertiary services, even robotic surgery, But their investment in primary health care was not there. Even some countries couldn't do contact tracing. So to prepare countries, I think Renewed commitment to strengthen primary healthcare is very important. So it starts from there and then, of course, we can go.
Then the other is we shouldn't see it in terms of health services, in terms of research development and so on. We should see it also in terms of communities. Communities can prepare for disease x. There are many things that can be done at community level And then public health education and communication should be at the center. So this is what I would like to say as to start.
Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Doctor. Tedros. And we'll come back and drill down into some of those comments in a moment. Preetha Reddy, thank Thank you for being here from India where you, and your family lead a very large, health care system, Apollo Health. I would love you to introduce a little bit about yourself and your health system and maybe also answer the brief question, what do you think health systems should do to prioritize?
Side?
Speaker 2: So I'm Prita, Vice Chair of Health Care Private Sector Health Care Group in India. We've been there for 40 years. What we've done in 40 years, I think the learning over the past, post COVID has really, you know, intensified what needs to be done. And, disease x, I know the name seems like a science fiction film, But, basically, it's something all of us need to be aware and alert definitely for, you know, for future times to come because it's definitely a clear and present danger. I want to draw an analogy with the army, especially the Indian army.
We know that every day, the infantry actually prepares for war. You know, they go through intense training, and at any time, if there is war at the border, they're ready to go and face that. I think health care workers, health care systems now have to look at the future like that, that at any time, anything can happen, and we don't know which side it's going to come from, and And there's there's no going away from that, so I think we have to prepare and be prepared. Like, there are alerts for, You know, global, scenarios, for us, it's usually cyclone or floods. There's a red alert or an orange alert.
I think the red alerts have to be flagged much quicker, which means we need to be able to realize that this could be potentially a huge problem. And for that, There's been so much of discussion about AI, and how can AI really help us to find and detect the problem so early that we can actually plan and prepare for interventions. I think that that is extremely important. But more than anything else, I am a very proud Indian, And I think that the leadership, the quick decisions, and the insistent decisions to do what we have to do at the right time. Sometimes they're hard decisions.
You face that. But I think to take the right decision, the hard decision, but to take a decision has been very important. And I think a population of 1,300,000,000 people, if we have been able to come out of this, relatively, you know, better than which could have been completed. And the fact that there was early intervention of vaccination, there was a lockdown. It was hard, but it was the decision making which I think helped does.
So I think that's important going forward.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Prita. Next, Roy Jacobs, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Philips Health Care. Roy, I'd love you to say a little bit about your company and give us your perspective.
Speaker 3: Yes, thank you so much. Yes, Phillips, 1 of 33 years old, we're focused fully on delivering health care solutions right now, and we were very active also during COVID. And I think some major lessons we learned as a company, but I think also we should take away for the health care system. First of all, it's all about the patient. And I think that one of the big learnings during COVID was that actually you cannot treat the patient maybe like you would normally do because you need to isolate.
You cannot touch the patient. Also, what are the specific means that you need to ramp up very quickly, like Respiratory devices, monitors. We had, of course, the vaccines. And how do you mobilize supply chain globally to actually do that? So I think that's the second big lesson.
Thirdly, it's all about the staff that needs to take care of these patients. And very quickly we saw that actually It became more and more challenging for the health care systems to actually keep the staff up and running, to keep them motivated, but also actually to protect them from, from the disease and keep doing their job. And then thirdly, was how can you then apply the latest, Also digital technology to help them in their daily jobs. Because there's a lot of technology available, but actually how do you then make sure that that quickly gets into the hands of the staff of the system, And you can actually scale it very rapidly. Last but not least, next to the agility I think we all learned that we need to have, It was also about fair allocation of means.
And as an industry player, that is not an easy task. And actually, we, we were very close with the, WHO as well to make sure that actually in the allocation mechanisms that we had, that we made sure that everybody in the world could benefit from equipment. Because very quickly what you see people get very centric on their own interest. And actually if the system closes down and everybody only focusing on their own interest, actually we cannot Solve a global crisis. So I think keep the world open, make sure that we allocate fairly and that actually we keep the scaling up possible is something that we took away as some of our lessons.
Speaker 0: Wonderful, Roy. Thank you so much. Next, it's my honor to introduce her excellency, Nisha Trenden Liman from Brazil, the Minister of Health of Brazil. And I would, invite you to use your headphones as her excellency will speak in Portuguese. If you could introduce yourself and say a little bit about your perspective on health system strengthening.
Okay. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Are you speaking in Portuguese?
Speaker 4: First of all, I'd like to say that I bring the perspective of Brazil, the vision of the Ministry of Health. But I would like to make a sort of more encompassing reflection along the lines of what my fellow panelists have done. First of all, Doctor. Stadros Adhanon made a Good explanation about the origin of disease X. Nevertheless, I believe that all of us see this issue in the light of the impact of the COVID-nineteen pandemic.
Several evaluations were performed in Brazil. And the first point that I would like to bring up is to remind you of Claus Ederer, the German sociologist, who says that Society has learned, but it is difficult for the world to change. So we have the learnings of the pandemic, but we need some transformative forces in order to think about an effective ability to respond to potential Diseases that may call cause pandemics. And this regard to have resilient health systems is Fundamental, this is also being said here. Still, I would like to start by mentioning that and situations of a pandemic threat or in a picture of a pandemic or epidemics that may have a Severe national impact.
There is a preceding factor in my view. I mean, not proceeding, but It leads to bringing these preconditions of a health system together, which is the time for a political response. And that is valid domestically in a pandemic as well as around the world. There have been there has been important analytical work done in that regard. And in the case of the administration prior to that of president Zlula, what we saw was prior to that of President Zlula, what we saw was a very negative response in view of the possibilities of the health system.
The country failed to respond in that pandemic,
Speaker 5: presenting
Speaker 4: 11% of COVID caused deaths with a population that if we work this out, comes out as 4%. So what to do As of now, a few points that I consider important. First, the investment in R and D and innovation And decreasing the inequality amongst countries in this regard, especially concerning the development and production of Vaccines, medication, diagnoses, and tests. So we are proposing an alliance for such production to be made at a local and regional level. At the same time,
Speaker 2: it is very
Speaker 4: important for a vision to be implemented about an encompassing surveillance for diseases and possible epidemics and pandemics. There's some surveillance could be seen in a whole fashion, starting with primary care, as Doctor. That's what I said. We also want to reinforce epidemiological centers in the country so that surveillance can be Better oriented. In this regard, I'd like to stress
Speaker 0: a
Speaker 4: Brazilian experience of the Center For Health data collection and analysis, which is an agency that attempts to integrate data, which is another crucial factor when you think about structuring to respond to pandemics, to integrate data and to be able to analyze them in order to ensure such surveillance work. One of the projects, in course, is one of early warning for possible outbreaks, which integrates primary care, including the role of community health workers in The country all the way up to genomic surveillance. I think that this is a very important aspect. Lastly, A national strategy that we have and that we want to expand in a global health discussion, putting together an industrial health economic complex that allows For us to under organize this, production of imports and thereby decrease equalities, thus strengthening National systems, especially in the low income countries and middle income countries too, namely developing countries. Lastly, I'd like to draw your attention to a critical aspect, which is that of establishing a virtuous relationship between science production and product and scientific knowledge and the decision making process, I believe we should also have a more in-depth look at that.
What is the best way to make this association, to build this bridge and comparatively analyze the different formats we observed In the process of responding to the COVID 19, pandemic and other diseases like Ebola And the creation of CDC Africa among several other initiatives, namely to center The discussion around the best way to have the, public policies defined by scientific evidence on the one hand And strengthening health systems, on the other hand, in an integral fashion. I think that these are the best ways. And to conclude, I think that we are discussing a tool for pandemics in the WHO. And I think that health alone cannot just to resolve all of the discussions and matters. So we have to include in this agenda the social protection systems, which are vital in times of crisis like the ones that we lived through recently.
Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Her since and I really agree on this with all that you've said, especially the last point about the expanding outside of health care, those systems that must be part of our response. Next, I will introduce the kind gentleman to my left, Michel de Maers, who is the Chairman of the Board of AstraZeneca. I wonder if you'd like to give us your opening comments.
Speaker 5: Yes, of course. I think what we can say first of all is that a good preparation for a crisis happens when there is no crisis. And so having a panel like this Yeah. It's already a great start because you have all the players of the health care ecosystem represented here because at the end, we have to all work together To try to address it. Now, as you said, I'm the Chairman of AstraZeneca.
That obviously has played a pretty special role during the COVID crisis. And I think we have A few lessons that we can share from this. Just as a reminder, we are not we were not a vaccine company at the time. We just decided that, this was a Call for action that we have to try to use our know how and our networks to try to help. And so we signed a license agreement with the University of We then put together a network of more than 20 contract manufacturing organization to which we transferred Technology and, skills to basically help building the vaccine, which is not it's not like building a pill.
It's much more complicated than that. And then finally, we we managed to distribute more than 3,000,000,000 doses of vaccines at no profit, of which more or less 2 thirds went to low and medium income countries, mainly through COVAX, which was obviously A very important organization at, at the time too. And obviously, Seth, you are here to witness this. What I think is important, if you do all the lessons from this experience, first of all, quick action, quick decision making, extremely important, but even more important, Partnerships and especially PPPs. You have heard me.
We have we have partnered with academia, obviously, with governments, with regulators, with third party commercial contractors and with NGOs. And it's only because of that that we finally managed to to, distribute the largest dose, actually, of COVID vaccines during this crisis. So that is lessons learned, but I would say a Spontaneous reaction because the crisis was at the door when this happened. If you think back a little bit, say, oh, could we better prepare next time? We put a lot of emphasis nowadays on sustainability and resilience of health systems.
We have seen that health systems were not prepared for that last time, not only to handle the the sheer volume of COVID case, But some examples, for instance, in the UK, it is estimated that a 1000000 cancer cases were not diagnosed during COVID just because of lack of resources in the health system. So obviously, that cannot happen. It is a transformation that will take a certain time and I would have basically 3 recommendations for that. First of all, I think it's important that health become a strategic asset for every country. And it's not always the case, I can tell you that.
We do that for energy, why not for health? Is there anything more important than the good health of your population? Because good health do I have prosperity? Do I have work efficiency? And so economic growth?
And so we are willing to work on that. There's a McKinsey study that says that With good health, we could add $12,000,000,000,000 to the global GDP by 2,040. That is quite an impact if we work on it. So that is point 1. The second is it's not just about spending more.
It's also spending smarter. A shocking statistic, for instance, in OECD countries, the average spends on prevention is 3% of the budget of health systems. And obviously, if you don't spend so little on prevention, you end up spending the majority of your budget on hospitalization and on late treatments. So there's a lot of change that needs to happen there and that can be extremely useful. And then the turn one is obviously we have To build on technology, on data management, on artificial intelligence.
I agree with you. There's a lot to do. We can start building Across the board, the libraries of viruses, of vaccines, share data with each other because it's quite important when it happens. Then artificial intelligence can also help a lot, not only in drug discovery. It's a lot of potential there, but also in the administration of health systems and trying to rationalize and to make sure that finally most of the budget is really spent for Primary care and for innovations rather than being always reactive.
So I would hold it here for them.
Speaker 0: Wonderful ideas. Thank you. Thank you so very much. And we'll come back around on several of those. Doctor.
Tedros, I would like to come back to you. You know, obviously, the World Health Organization is in the unique Place to assure global collaboration among countries. And certainly, you have some work products underway to address these emerging challenges and to promote sustainable improvements in health care delivery worldwide. Wondered if you could share a little bit more about your plans in that regard.
Speaker 1: Yes. Thank you. I think I should start from thanking AstraZeneca also. What Michel said is correct. I think he asked Also said my friend to attest to it.
Since I am here, I hope I represent both of us. And AstraZeneca, the vaccine has reached many developing and middle and low income countries. And the volume he said, and we're very, very grateful. So we know that. And the technology transfer You have met with other countries to produce, yes, and I think that really, really helped.
And that could be a model for the future. So, I fully agree with what you said with regard to AstraZeneca's contribution. And where recognition is due, it should be given. And this is an honest witness. I think Seth is saying that.
So thank you so much, Michel and AstraZeneca. Then on the issues, I think to prepare, Of course, as I said, after we started putting a a placeholder, The first that came was in the disease x is COVID. So we have experience now, And we are preparing based on that experience. A lot of assessment has been done by independent panels and experts. And based on the recommendation, many initiatives have we have already started many initiatives.
And one is together with many partners, by the way, with it's not just WHO, but with many partners, for instance, with the World Bank and other colleagues. We have established a pandemic fund. Mhmm. So that's basically for, preparedness, and some countries I've already benefited from it and 2nd round is in the pipeline. And then there are enhanced systems tools we're working on.
For instance, one of the problems, as you may remember, is the equity. Again, while thanking AstraZeneca, it was a serious problem. Many countries, high income countries, were holding vaccines, and low income countries were not getting vaccines. Access was a problem. And to address the equity problem, we have established the mRNA technology transfer hub in South Africa to this is to increase local production.
And 15 countries are participating, and Brazil is 1, which is already represented here. But there are Countries represented almost from all every every region, Europe, Asia, the Pacific, Latin America, Africa, and and and So that's going well and we hope we will have an increased production capacity that can address the equity problem. And there are still in systems and tools, there were weaknesses, as we all know, in surveillance, in sharing samples. And we have established the WHO Biohub to share samples and to improve surveillance. We have the pandemic Intelligence, collective collaborative intelligence hub, which we established and it's up and running now.
It's in good shape. And there are other things we're we're doing. I don't want to bother you outlining everything. There are things we're doing with workforce, but the key is The capacity we build in each and every country. We are as strong as the weakest link.
So where are we weak and Especially at the country level, that's where we should focus, while also investing in the global initiatives that we have started. And then the other key in order to have better prepared and to address the disease x is the pandemic agreement. The pandemic agreement can bring all the experience, all the challenges that we have faced and All the solutions into 1. And that agreement can help us to prepare for the future in in a better way because this is about a common enemy. And without a shared response, Starting from the preparedness, you know, we will face the same problem as as as COVID.
And deadline for the Pandemic agreement is May 2024, and member states are negotiating. This is between countries, and I hope they will deliver, this pandemic agreement by that time, on the deadline. Because if this generation cannot do it, we're the lived community. We have the firsthand experience. I don't think coming generation, the next generation will do it.
So for our children and grandchildren's sake, I think we have to convert all the lessons we have learned into this pandemic and prepare the world for For for the future because this is a common global interest, and national inter very narrow national interest should not come into into the way. Of course, national interest is natural, but it's the national interest that could be difficult and affecting the negotiations even As as as we speak. So we're still not prepared, but I think there are many moving parts we have started, Good ones, all of us together, that that can prepare us better if we focus on the implementation of these initiatives. Take to and back to you.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Tedros. Michel, may I come back to you for a moment? AstraZeneca is a cofounder of the Partnership of chip of health system sustainability and resilience, a really important initiative of the World Economic Forum. Tell us about some of the solutions this partnership Chip is driving and how that is going to help us be prepared across borders?
Speaker 5: Yes. It was pleasure. It's a partnership that was also born Out of the crisis, we started that in 2020 in partnership with London School of Economics and with WAF. And after that, we had all the partners joining us like Philips and KPMG. The idea is really to Try to make an assessment, of all the health system in the world.
So far, we have gone to 30 countries to do that And to produce a report, you know, with the the conclusions, but as well all the recommendations that we can do. We then Kind of take over with our partners and organize one table in each of the countries where we try to put together, all the actors of the ecosystem and really Try to work on solution, get them. And what you see is more and more we get there, and it becomes a source of inspiration. You know, I can give you a few examples. For instance, in Greece, where based on the recommendation, they started a whole program for scanning chronic kidney diseases and to anticipate that.
Or in Japan, where based on the recommendation, they finally managed to, co consolidate all the data in one electronic system that they can use for the future. So these are a few examples that, can be done. We continue to work on that because at the end, it's each of these small initiative For which each time we can find the right partner and maybe also a different way of financing that will help turning this financial resilience of health system into a better situation.
Speaker 0: It's really fascinating. And Preetha, I'm going to come to you because you can speak about this topic from the health system point of view. And, of course, India had, the recent g twenty presidency. And I would love for you to tell us a little about how Apollo Health Care Systems are aligning their efforts with this international agenda that we've been talking about.
Speaker 2: Thank you. I think, you know, the g twenty presidency was definitely something which made us very proud. But more than anything else, it said systems, and there was a lot of work which has gone into it and commitments made that we have to handle health care for the future. One of the issues which came up was the rising burden of infectious diseases and how can we put, good, strong vigilant systems into our health care, especially with the fact that, you know, a lot of India is not really in the urban regions. There's a lot of rural, And we have 600,000 villages.
And how do we use technology to reach out to it? It was a very strong focus during the g twenty and how and using technology, using telemedicine to reach out to the rural population was one one major initiative. The other is and there's been so many conversations, especially at the at the forum, is about women's health and, gender equity. So it was coined as equity, and women have to have equity in you know, they have to have A seat at the table at every, every instance. Also, we the fact was that
Speaker 1: We're here.
Speaker 2: Half the world's population, 49.7 percent of the $8,000,000,000 is actually women, but research is not skewed completely towards a fifty-fifty partnership. And I think that, we more focus on research, which would, which will treat not only the women related diseases, but all encompassing diseases, maybe cardiovascular or, you know, the orthopedic diseases. I think this came into a lot of focus at that time, and so TechQuity became Very important, for us. The lack of skill manpower, and it's a global shortage. We just do not have enough doctors and nurses to heal the world.
So using technology, you know, how could we, help them access? So I think digital learning tools, training tools had a had a great focus. Apollo did it during COVID that, within a span of 2 weeks, We were able to train about all a 150,000 workers workforce on ventilator management Because, you know, while there was a shortage of ventilators, even if there were ventilators, we didn't have enough people, to be able to use it. And I think this kind of, took the global fancy, and there's been a lot of training, small modules, but for health care workers, for aging for the aging population, for bedside care, and for multiple other, requirements. So I think that was, again, a part of the G20 presidency.
A strong focus on AI and digital, I think, got discussed in every folder, and we know that You know, health is is a very strong backbone, and so AI and health, digital reach in health was was a huge focus. We know that the NCDs kill 41,000,000 people each year, and it's 74% of all the deaths globally. And so the awareness On NCDs, dealing with, NCDs and the anti, microbial resistance. I think the AMR again was a huge focus, and, g 20, you know, was is looking for solutions for that. One, initiative which was very intrinsic to our part of the world was the focus on alternate medicine systems and Ayurveda and all the other, health care systems, And how could we come out with integrative health care?
So maybe we could do the diagnosis using high-tech, but could can we use these ancient systems of medicine for areas where it's not really required to use very strong Allopathic drugs. So I think that was one of our discussion points also. But more than any anything else, it was about collaborating Collaborating to give access to to the underserved, whether it was financial or geographical access. How do we make, health systems more accountable for the outcomes which are so important to us? And then how do we collaborate and to be able to quickly turn around the things which have been challenging us in the future.
So I think all these discussions were useful during the g 20, And Apollo paid played a very intrinsic part of of that as part of the leadership team.
Speaker 0: Wonderful. Thank you so much. And You focused a little in your, comments about the digitization of health care. And, Roy, I'd love to come to you on that topic. Philips certainly has been a leader, across the world and and very focused here at the World Economic Forum on these topics, including value in health care.
I wonder if you could give us your perspectives on how these tools can help us be prepared for any future crisis our health care systems might face?
Speaker 3: Yes, sure. So I think we are very concerned about access to care in general. I think we saw that as challenged when you have a crisis like COVID or any, kind of infectious disease that could come after. But even today, actually, we lose more patients to cardiac disease in a year than we have lost to COVID. And that is also because we cannot, operate at capacity anymore.
And if you now look at the productivity of the health care system, why are we not as productive as we can be? It's because actually the learning agility, and adaptability to what is possible is not yet fully there. And we saw actually in COVID what is possible if you look at it systemically. What I mean with systemically, if you look to what technology can do, we can scan 3 times as many patients if you use AI now on an MRI. We can actually predict within 24 hours, even within 2 weeks, if a cardiac arrest will happen.
But you need to have the clinical practice to adopt these technologies. You also need to have the financial system to support and reimburse some of these new practices. And then you need to have the regulatory system that actually allows this To be adopted. So if you have these 4 lining up, then actually you get massive change and adoption. And we saw that with COVID.
Unfortunately, what we also have seen, actually, there's backtracking. So funding is going away from some of the digital technology or remote, kind of services that we were providing. Some of the kind of regulatory frameworks are becoming more contingent in terms of how you deal with data instead of what data can allow for. So I think for us is we keep pushing a technology boundary. It's a lot possible, and we talk a lot about that in AI.
And it's not talk. It's what we can do day to day in the workflow of healthcare. But we need to work together to actually really get that massive change going. And that's something we are very passionate about, and these kind of forums help to actually mobilize the whole system integrally.
Speaker 0: Wonderful. Thank you. And Her Excellency, I'd love to give you the last question in our time together today. As Brazil takes on the presidency of the G20, tell us about some of the investments that you see that will be made in terms of helping us address these issues of health system preparedness? Well,
Speaker 6: So I had mentioned before Regarding preparedness in light of possible emergencies, I think, First of all, we need to be able to strengthen our health care systems. That's the first point. That investment should be for primary care. But I think more and more, we understand the importance of coordinating the entire health
Speaker 0: system.
Speaker 6: So being able to strengthen that aspect. And second, we need to have better equity in terms of science, technology and innovation. I'm just going to give you a brief example. During the pandemic in Brazil, I participated in this specific initiative as President of FIO CRUZ, which was to higher and develop well, which was the contract seen with Oxford through an agreement that we had with AstraZeneca, we had the opportunity to incorporate the technology that was being used there and develop it in our country. [SPEAKER UNIDENTIFIED COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE:] So this is very important.
And during the GE20 presidency, we want to strengthen such partnerships, both locally, regionally, but also globally. A third aspect that has to do with preparedness is strengthening our surveillance systems, so better integrating data, integrating all the knowledge, The information that we have from primary care preparedness has to do, in my opinion, with science, technology and innovation. We need to consider that 90% of patents are concentrated in 10% of the countries. So this is something that maybe we need to consider and try and change. One other issue that has to do with this aspect is being able to strengthen supply chain that are more local and also strengthen cooperation between G20 countries and develop multilateralism with the strengthening of organizations such as the Also, in line with the concept of preparedness and preparation, we have included The idea of integrating data, in order to do that, we need to improve our Digital systems.
So during the G20 presidency, we proposed the topic of equity in access to health, but also the use of digital health and the strengthening of these systems. And recently, I mentioned this before, In Brazil, we published a report by the Brazilian Academy of Medicine that Assess the role of international intelligent inter of artificial intelligence in the health system. So All the positive aspects, all the way from diagnosis that can come from applying this technology, but also all the way to integrating data. And we also have concerns about education And being able to develop these technologies in our own countries, in developing countries. So I think those are the main aspects that I wanted to emphasize.
Wonderful.
Speaker 0: Thank you. And certainly a bold agenda. And I think, I feel very comforted in knowing that all of these leaders and, Doctor. Doctor. Tedros, who had to lead for another engagement, are all very focused on these issues.
And the World Economic Forum, again, I would like to just say, is a hub for all of this global collaboration to happen together. So thank you to each of the panelists for your participation, and thank you all for attending today.
Speaker 3: Oh, we got it.
Speaker 4: We got
Speaker 0: a group photo.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
They are also promoting this book which has a foreword by Tony Blair. https://t.co/QRa9xgfQFc
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
I'm covering Disease X, a secret weapon of the New World Order, on the Alex Jones Show today. Tune in to the livestream on X for the deep dive NOW! https://t.co/1HNcAc35Lo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the concept of "Disease X," a hypothetical virus with a 100% kill rate that could potentially cause widespread death. It suggests that the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are involved in the development of Disease X, with the aim of profiting from it. The video also mentions the potential impact of Disease X on the global population and the economy. Additionally, it promotes a video game called "Alex Jones New World Order Wars" as a means to fund the "info war" leading up to the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who knows what their internal numbers are, but as far as we can pull together, the psychos at Davos 2024 are gleefully celebrating their victorious genocide of 17,000,000 people from their poisonous jabs with far more in their sights? The unelected so called health experts at Davos 2024 are now prioritizing disease x, the final solution to solidify new world order domination? How did we get here? It began with utilizing COVID hysteria. Doctor Fauci blew up the age old regulatory process for testing new vaccines in order to bring in a host of DNA altering technology?
COVID has since been proven to have been created in a lab. Disease x is lab driven from the outset. Decades of researching human genes in mice and other animals and the discovery of ancient diseases have resulted in the World Economic Forum nonchalantly predicting that disease x with a 100% kill rate could spread across the world in as little as 30 6 hours killing upwards of 80,000,000 people? Research has been ongoing at the UK's high security state of the art facility in Porton Down where a threat list grows of animal viruses capable of infecting humans? Meanwhile, the United States Congress is pushing the bioresearch bill, HR 3832, to further US Labs' research of disease x.
Disease x represents far more than a pandemic of untold mass death? Disease x allows the pharma billionaires behind it to become trillionaires.
Speaker 1: Now disease x, I've been teaching this sort of thing pretty well full time since 1990. And, I've never heard of this disease x. So I looked at some of my books because when I wrote my book, I couldn't remember putting it in. So it wasn't in there, but so it must be A new disease. It's a virus we don't know yet, but we do know it's out there.
But the video I was doing yesterday was Examining a particular virus, that was experimentally used to infect mice caused a disease of the brain and the at the end of the study, none of the mice at the end of the study were alive anymore. And that virus, My understanding from reading of the paper was it had been it evolved in cell cultures in a laboratory. So as a result of going through cell cultures in a laboratory, the function of the virus had been, had been increased.
Speaker 2: So is the next pandemic really preventable?
Speaker 0: Funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation supported CEPI to invest 1,200,000 in a start up to create under the tongue vaccine wafers for needle free vaccines against disease x while simultaneously allowing the World Health Organization's pandemic treaty to reach into sovereign nations and bypass their governments, a policy shifting Trojan horse that was rehearsed at the cladex tabletop exercise by the Johns Hopkins Center in Washington DC in 2018?
Speaker 3: The World Health Organization estimates that 150,000,000 people have died. That's 2% of the global population. In the US, there've been an estimated 82,000,000 severe cases And 15,000,000 deaths. At least 5,000,000 cladex deaths happened because adequate medical care wasn't available. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 90%.
The GDP, down 50%. It was only by nationalizing the health care One third of the US congress is dead or incapacitated. What if years go by without a vaccine? Then experts tell us that we could eventually
Speaker 0: reported? Playdex is said to have illustrated high level strategic decisions and policies needed to prevent severe pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail and will educate senior leaders at the highest levels of US government as well as members of the global policy and preparedness community and the general public? Disease x is coming, but it isn't some chaotic pandemic we must manage. It is a genocidal kill weapon agreed upon by the worst members of humanity. John bound reporting?
Speaker 1: Ladies and
Speaker 2: gentlemen, it's happening. 2 years in the making, we didn't plan it like this because we didn't know to release Alex Jones New World Order Wars that's all about fighting Epstein and Clinton and Hillary and the deep state and the pito rings. Whole levels just dealing with that because that's the truth how they operate. And now the game went on Steam, the biggest Online platform of video games in the world, a 150,000,000 users a week, and it already shot to number 1. So find the link to steam at alexjonesgamedot com or search Alex Jones New World Order Wars at steam and get it for yourself.
It's got an incredible 90 7% reviews. We'll put the link to Steam on screen and to alexjonesgame.com. Get it. We are taking back the culture. We are taking is back.
This will fund the info war going into the election the next 10 months. Don't let me fail if you don't take action. Get New World War Wars by Alex Jones now.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
In 2002 Alex Jones warned about the New World Order. And diseases...worth a listen. https://t.co/CktDHo9Lv5
Video Transcript AI Summary
There have been corrupt empires, secret societies, and oligarchies throughout history. In 2002, a tyrannical organization called The New World Order emerged, pushing for worldwide government, a cashless society, and open borders. They believe there are too many people and want to reduce the population by 80%. The globalists have convinced some liberals and conservatives that this is the intelligent thing to do. They promote a radical form of social Darwinism, where the state controls healthcare and releases diseases to control us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Facts and common sense are in. Yes. There have been corrupt empires. Yes. They manipulate.
Yes. There are secret societies. Yes. There have been oligarchies throughout history. And, yes, today, in 2,002, there is a tyrannical organization calling itself The new world order pushing for worldwide government, a cashless society, Open borders.
Total and complete tyranny where human beings are absolutely worthless. There's 6 and a quarter +1000000000 of us, and the globalists have said it many times. There's too many of us. We're causing a problem. We need to be called at the tune of 80%.
It's amazing to talk about that, but it's the globalist, the UN, their own public statements, and they've convinced a lot of Liberals and elitist conservatives and others, that by going along with this, that we're intelligent members of society. It's the ultimate mouthless world view. It is, this radical virulent form of social Darwinism. It's the excuse of tyrants. And by creating open borders where there's no national sovereignty and only global bodies that control all the resources.
By centralizing and socializing health care, the state becomes God, basically, when it comes to your health, and then by releasing diseases and viruses and plagues upon us, we then basically get shoved into their system.
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
Russia has already warned us about ‘Disease X’. I posted this video 8 months ago. “The American Government is planning once again to release Biological Warfare on their Citizens…” This is what the World Economic Forum means by ‘Pandemics’. https://t.co/nZmv90IheY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United States, like in 2019, is preparing for a new pandemic by searching for virus mutations. They are using advanced technologies for national and global management purposes, creating crisis situations of a biological nature.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Сша как и в 2019 году приступили к подготовке к новой пандемии путем поиска мутации вирусов если применение соединенные штаты так называемых обо технологий в нас целях а также целях глобального управления путем создания кризис ситуаций би характера
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Alex Jones breaks down Disease X and answers.... What is Disease X? How will Disease X be used to enslave humanity? Watch and Share. https://t.co/Z8YFof8hkS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The panel discussed "disease x," a hypothetical pathogen that could cause a more deadly pandemic than COVID-19. However, the speaker believes that disease x does not exist and is just a term used for gain-of-function bioweapons. They claim that governments are using disease x to push for a global treaty that would establish a corporate world government. The speaker also suggests that top scientists have evidence of illegal gain-of-function research happening worldwide, including the splicing of different viruses to create COVID-19. They mention the scandal of gain-of-function research in the US and its subsequent move to Wuhan. The video ends with a promotion for Infowars as a source of truthful information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now another issue on the agenda is a panel dedicated to the so called disease x, a hypothetical pathogen that may cause new pandemic many times more deadly than COVID. What do you expect to come out of those talks?
Speaker 1: Well, we know what disease x is. The governments from Russia to China, to the US, to France, the Japanese, they all know what diseases are here. You have new mutations of diseases, but there's no disease x. There's a new mutation of an already existing disease. So disease x is a is a holding place or a catchall for gain of function bioweapons where they genetically splice viruses and also mutate viruses with radiation And other techniques to make them more communicable and more deadly.
And so we have the UN that wants a worldwide treaty to take control of nation states and borders and transportation and trade with their UN, pandemic treaty, Really trying to establish a corporate world government, the name of it, hyping up disease x and saying it's gonna kill 50,000,000 people and it's imminent. Well, how can they be developing a vaccine for a disease that doesn't exist yet? And we know in China, in the United States, In Ukraine, all over the world, western governments have been caught producing weaponized biological weapons in these labs, not for defensive purposes, but for offensive purposes. You know, top scientists have reported it would take a 1000000000 years for in perfect conditions for the COVID 19 to occur naturally. 5 different viruses from around the world spliced together.
It's basically impossible. And so we have as illegal gain of function, going on around the world. In 2015, it was a big scandal when Obama was caught allowing gain of function at the University of Texas, Galveston and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. So they then moved it to Wuhan so they released it. They could then have probable, plausible deniability about who made it.
Speaker 2: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visit infowars.comforward/show and share the link today.
@LarryTaunton - Larry Alex Taunton
I went undercover to the World Economic Forum. There is simply no substitute for being there in person. Watch my new documentary where I give you a peak behind the curtain of the WEF and their agenda. #WEF2024 https://t.co/mux1afPv4P
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker attended the World Economic Forum (WEF) to observe and understand its agenda. They believe that the WEF is focused on population control and reducing the global population. The speaker describes the WEF as a gathering of heads of state and corporate leaders who promote corporate fascism and influence policies on various issues. They mention their interactions with attendees and their observations of presentations on topics like human trafficking. The speaker criticizes the WEF's theme of rebuilding trust, stating that the organization itself violated trust during the pandemic. They also discuss the WEF's fear of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin due to their opposition to the globalist agenda. The speaker emphasizes the need for critical questioning and evaluation of the WEF's agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was at this year's World Economic Forum meeting because I have learned from vast experience that there just simply is no substitute for being there. At their core, the World Economic Forum is about population control. They wanna reduce the global population. And so I decided I needed to be there. I wanted to mingle among these people.
I wanted to see what those people are about, who are they. And because they just assume that I'm a weffer like everybody else, they talk quite openly. They never say things, so they never use words like say kill. Ladies and gentlemen, I've read Cloud Schwab's books. The carbon they wanna reduce is you.
You're the carbon they want to reduce. I will once again be attending this Here's World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Now you may ask, what is the World Economic Forum was founded by the infamous Klaus Schwab, the German engineer in 1971. And since that Time he has been the sole chairman of the World Economic Forum. It's a place where heads of state gather.
It is the global center of corporate fascism. It's some of the policies that you see Affecting the west in a big way on everything from the environment to your own personal freedoms to digital
Speaker 1: Extremity.
Speaker 0: You name it. It's coming out of the World Economic Forum. I'm in Zurich, Switzerland now after a very, very long trip. I had About a 7 hour layover in London after a flight to Amsterdam was canceled. And so it took me a little while to get here, but Here I am and I am, now in a taxi on my way out to the west.
There's Nothing going on this evening. I'll just grab a hotel. It's about 20 degrees here and there's a light snow, but My driver here, he knows what he's doing, so we'll be in touch tomorrow. Gonna get a good night's sleep tonight.
Speaker 2: It's here, Switzerland at the window of my hotel here. And, you catch these trains here, you take them up to Davos. And, not that far away. Time to get
Speaker 0: time to Get ready. Last year, there were, oh, let's see, a 116 billionaires, About 50 heads of state, 600 CEOs of major corporations, and about, oh, 27100 others. And We say the numbers are even higher this year. So if you're of the opinion, the left is irrelevant that you would be mistaken because they have enormous influence On governments around the world, Dean, Elon likes to brag. They have penetrated, governments around the world.
Didn't sleep very well, but I did get some coffee and a good breakfast and, now make my way up Davos, which is about an hour away. The WAF is a kind of,
Speaker 3: Oh, HOA from hell as I like to say.
Speaker 0: These are individuals who are quite certain that it is their right to tell you how to live and what you should do on everything from the way you eat to the amount of energy that you use and the car you drive and even The kind of job that you might have. They are individuals who cannot bear the thought that someone somewhere is free. That someone somewhere their grass might be too high. They might be eating beef. They might be watching a a program that isn't approved by the alphabet mafia, h o a from hell.
The kind of perspective that I wanna give you is a little different from perhaps what others are doing. 70% of the web is online. You can watch it yourself. So what we're doing is we're taking a look at what's taking place away from the major sessions and just engaging with ordinary people.
Speaker 3: I mean, honestly, it's almost like they were trying trying very consciously to model their after Spectre, after Bond villains. You know, this reminds me, Klaus Schwab, you know, even even kinda looks like Telly Ceballos on her majesty's secret service. And, a like him has his, alpine Fortress,
Speaker 0: and that's where we're going.
Speaker 3: You notice the traffic It's getting a little thicker. The automobiles are getting a little bit nicer as we get closer to the left.
Speaker 0: Right now, making our way up the mountain to Davos, and we are going through a security checkpoint here because you have more than 60 heads of state at this particular event. Now the WEF, again, it is a global Gathering of pretentious pricks.
Speaker 3: I mean, that really is what it is. The as
Speaker 0: I say, the HOA from hell, these are People are all sure that they have the right to tell you how to live. Yeah. We're about to go through the checkpoint right here, right now, but we're Making our way up the mountain. We'll be there in just a few minutes. It should be a very, very interesting day Today today, it's my intention to engage with just web attendees.
Now why would I do that? Well, because those are the people who really buying into what is being sold here at the World Economic Forum. They pay enormous sums of money To be a part of the west, you have to be a member, and then you have to pay conference fees. And those can get up well into 6 figures to do something thing like this. Now now, of course, I'm not doing it.
I just show up and I walk into places like I own them. And so far, that's worked for me. Now how long that Hold out. I don't know. But as I say, just your audacity can often be a replacement for a lack of money when your when your pocketbook just simply isn't up to the task.
So we're working our way up the mountain. We'll be there here shortly, and I'll try to update you
Speaker 3: as soon as I can.
Speaker 0: I just was rejected from one of the buildings that I Tried to enter you know, typically, you can bluff your way into almost anything. Simply, just a little pro tip for you, by acting like you I meant to be there. It's amazing how many places you can get into. But on this particular occasion, the place is so full. They're rejecting Everyone from getting inside, doesn't matter.
We're still gonna achieve what we came here to do. Well, it turned out that that was great blessing in disguise because I walked straight out of that meaning, basically, you know, maybe maybe a Soccer field away and into another big, building where, the former prime minister of Portugal, the former prime minister of the UK, Theresa May, the CEO of Hewlett Packard and her royal Inez, Princess Eugenie for giving a presentation on human trafficking. So I just went straight in.
Speaker 4: I'd like to welcome you on behalf of Gold's House who, of course, are a diverse community of business, political leaders, activists, NGOs, and entrepreneurs who come together and there are significant global moments throughout the year with the mission for driving progress to achieve the UN Sustainable development goals by 2030. That's some of the details of what it's doing, but it's primary. It is to raise the political momentum. As John says, get the sort of people who are here in this room but here elsewhere at Davos to recognize that this is an issue they need to pay attention to. They need to ensure they've got the legislation.
Companies need to take action because the only way we're going to eradicate on savory is by working together.
Speaker 0: I went straight up to Theresa May and introduced myself and was able to ask her a number of very pointed questions, not prudently, but substantive questions about her presentation.
Speaker 5: I understand you you ran to a Theresa May. She seems familiar. I think she was prime minister about 22 minutes once, not that long ago, and you had
Speaker 0: an opportunity to to speak to her. Sat and listened to a lecture on human trafficking from Theresa May and others. And afterwards, I was able to have a conversation with her about her assertions, you know, regarding Ukraine. Ukraine is a big theme here. Zelensky spoke today, and surprising to no one, he asked for from these, you know, 60 heads of state for $54,000,000,000.
That oh, and he also asked them to topple Putin.
Speaker 6: And we need you in Ukraine to build, to reconstruct, To restore our lives, each of you can be even more successful with Ukraine.
Speaker 5: News flash. Zelensky isn't going to win. Zelensky isn't even gonna be there. He'll flee to England or the United States to live for the rest of his life for the whole bunch of the money that we gave him my guess.
Speaker 0: Now something I would want you to understand, about the WEF that you probably don't get when you are at home is that it it feels to me kind of like one of those conferences that you were that you were required by your, employer to go to some kind of continued education, You know, nonsense or a united way meeting or or perhaps just a bad church. I mean, there's there's all these lofty platitudes to some, more fuzzy words that they throw around. And this year's theme is rebuilding trust, which itself is kinda curious given the fact that it was the World Economic Forum's attendees, their members, those people who are at the very top who violated our trust in the first place, specifically, most notably with the pandemic. And yet here they are, the ones who present themselves as the guardians of trust.
Speaker 1: We must rebuild trust, and that's actually the theme of our beating. We have to rebuild trust, trust in our future, Trust in our capacity to overcome challenges, and most importantly, trust
Speaker 0: in Egypt. And then you had, the president of European Commission, Ursula van der Leyen, Saying that, the focus of the web she said this yesterday, maybe it was the day before, that the focus of the web attendees is to address and disinformation.
Speaker 4: The top concern for the next 2 years is not conflict or Climate. It is disinformation and misinformation.
Speaker 0: She went on to say That that's more important to them than the environment, than more than hunger than agriculture. It was addressing this. But, again, what the the assumptions Behind that is that we are the self appointed guardians and the of truth.
Speaker 7: The left has sort of been emphasizing the notion that truth is relative, that you cannot assert absolute truths. And yet suddenly that relativism of the past several decades appears to be chucked out the window and the left is now asserting That this is true. Basically, what we say is true, what they say is true, and any rival view is Either misinformation or disinformation.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly, Dinesh. I think they still are in the business of relativizing truth, all truth except those that are important to them. So The result is that they've recreated in a sense the Roman pantheon. You know, you can believe what you wanna believe.
Hey. We'll we'll put your gods in our In our, God Hall of Fame, yeah, you can worship that too. They they wanna relativize everything, but Everyone must worship the state. That is to say the super state that they would create the the globalist a vision which they have cast for themselves and and so it was in in Roman times, of course, as you well know, relativize all truths, but Everyone must acknowledge the absolute truth of the state and see they see themselves as the arbiters of truth. I mean, for the the year of the Presidents of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, to say that they're addressing Misinformation and disinformation, which in and of itself is is Orwellian doublespeak.
It also implies that they're the arbiters of truth. I mean, we're the ones who will decide what is truth and, you know, they're they're not about the protection of free speech. They freeze see free speech as toxic, but they wanna protect their own free speech. Uh-huh. What they What they're really taking aim at in this case is social media, not just any social media because they're all controlled by Waffers with the exception of Twitter.
They wanna shut it down. They wanna shut down they wanna shut down people like me, and they're already doing it in in a number of that I won't get into here, but it is important that you get on our mailing list so that we can communicate with you, independent of Any other social media platform that will make us uncancelable. So we need you we really, really need you to do that. At the left, I say again, it's like going to something that your employer would require you to go to. Way back, you know, when I was in the academic world, I would be saying, you know, once a year, you have to go to some kind of seminar that would be about some kind of topic like, oh, let's say, You know, finding commonality, celebrating diversity.
That was one that I remember attending some years ago. It was complete nonsense. But, again, you have the love lofty slogan. So rebuilding trust is one of them. Another one, sort of a sub slogan or The theme of this year's web was, let's see.
It's transparency, accountability, and consistency, all things that they don't do. I mean, there's no accountability for these people. They're absolutely I've never seen anything like And when elected officials of many of these people are elected, many of them are not. But they show absolute disdain and Disregard for the people who elected them or at least the people who they represent even if they didn't vote for
Speaker 2: them.
Speaker 8: This is a neck and neck race and no one feels very comfortable on the Democratic side of things that Donald Trump isn't gonna be the next president.
Speaker 4: Well, I don't think that nobody feels. I think Many of us know that it is impossible, for him to be the president again.
Speaker 0: We're seeing that with the Democratic Party in the United And that's curious to me because that's always a sign that the fix is in. When You're going into an election year, and you're treating your constituents, voters so badly. You would only do that if you knew that the fix was in, and that's the kind of thing that we're seeing here at the WEALTH. And I wanna give you a sense of of of how the week flows and what it's like. I mean, it's interesting because most of the presentations, you have central presentations, But then you have surrounding it loads of other presentations.
And they might be on things like, let's say, farming, or on,
Speaker 3: you know, media
Speaker 0: or on conflict resolution or dealing with stress or Immigration or in the case of Theresa May, human trafficking. I mean, things that for the most part, you wouldn't object to. And that's because it's kinda like that final scene at, Indiana Jones of the last crusades, you know, that you chose poorly, you know, scene where the holy grail is disguised by all of these fake grails. A good thing is surrounded by all of these bad things. The bad things that will kill you and one of them If you like, except in this case, it's the inverse.
It is it is the bad thing that is being disguised by by Relatively good things. And see, the what if is the what if is clever about this because they have lots of presentations
Speaker 2: on loads
Speaker 0: of benign topics, what you wouldn't find particularly interesting, but you wouldn't find particularly objectionable. But that's their way of hiding what they're actually about. And that's because the web again, if you if you understand nothing else from what I'm telling you here, The web is fundamentally anti human. They are not about saving or really even helping humanity. In in spite of all the things that they say, they are about saving the planet.
Depopulation, Does that sound like some sort of wild conspiracy theory to you? Well, listen to these World Economic Forum agenda that contributors.
Speaker 9: So in the session we just attended here at the economic forum, I think there was a sense of relief actually in your frankness. You brought up some issues that that others are realizing
Speaker 2: that. Always.
Speaker 6: All the The religious groups are against me because I'm talking about population. They want more folks. I want less of the planet. It may look like there are many problems, but Actually there's only one problem. We are nice but we're just too many.
This we need to understand. Believe me, it It's much easier to control human population than human aspirations. You cannot control human aspirations. You can easily control human population if everybody is focused on that. The nations, the religions of the world, various community leaders, everybody, If they are focused on seeing how to bring down the population of this planet, human population, so that other populations can live.
Speaker 10: You have some thoughts about population as a driver beneath all of these things that we're talking about. Of, what should be done about population?
Speaker 6: For a
Speaker 11: long time it was considered politically incorrect to even mention it And most of the big, conservation organizations refused to mention it, but I always thought, I mean, You see what happens in the old days. There were cultures in a lot of these indigenous people and you had lots of children because they looked after you in your old age and you shared out the land but now it's different and they know it's different. And that's why there were bare hills all around Gombe. So we we've introduced in our program. We've introduced family planning.
So welcomed by the people because they know that Things are different. And, of course, this administration is cutting family planning around the developing world which is Terrifying to me. And so if you approach family planning right, it's something that's very, very important. And when it was considered politically incorrect to mention it, and I was determined to mention it, I decided to call it Voluntary population optimization. So by the time people worked it out.
Speaker 10: And Research shows educating girls
Speaker 2: is one of the smartest things.
Speaker 11: I meant to say that. Yes. Indeed. Women's education, empowering women, and Scholarships to keep girls in school beyond puberty. Family size then tends to drop worldwide.
Speaker 12: But in one way or another, We are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels which can be by this planet that I know in one way or another, it's gonna come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a a civil way. And and and I mean civil enough, you know, especially at peaceful.
Speaker 0: Marxo fascism. That's really what it is. I mean, Marxism at the lowest level of of society and then fascism at the top. Meaning at the bottom, there's, there's a kind of, you know, you will owe nothing and you will be happy. And then at the Where, you have individuals who have strictly regimented the economy and companies and corporations For warfare against the common man.
That's what ESG is. That's what we're seeing in ESG. It is it is pulling in all the reigns of, of various companies from Disney all the way over to, let's say, Coca Cola or, you know, take in Hollywood, universities, you name it. So that they they're all in the hands the reigns of these companies are All in the hands of globalists, and they do their bidding. And their bidding is to make war on the anti globalist people like me now Yesterday and probably you.
Now yesterday, the headliner was Javier Malai, who is the the new president of Argentina. President of Argentina, and I should say just a little bit about that because people are wondering, well, first of all, why would he Go. Well, if you have the invite to go and it speaks to these elitist pricks, I would urge you to Oh, he definitely should go. Try to get in front of them. Give them a piece of your mind.
And that's exactly what he did.
Speaker 1: And, of course, we are all For eager, to listen to you and, again, a very cordial welcome to the world.
Speaker 13: Good afternoon. Thank you very much. Today, I'm here to tell you that the western world is in danger. And it is endangered because those who are supposed to have to defend the values of the west are co opted by a vision of the world that inevitably leads to socialism and thereby to poverty. Unfortunately, in recent decades motivated by some well meaning individuals Willing to help others and others motivated by the wish to be long for privileged cause.
The main leaders of the western world have abandoned the model of freedom Four different versions of what we call collectivism. We're here to tell you that collectivist experiments And never the solution to the problems that afflict the citizens of the world. Rather, they are the root cause. Do believe me. No one better place than us, Argentines, to testify to these two points.
Speaker 0: Some people suggested silly things like he's controlled Opposition or something like that. I think that's complete nonsense. Malai interesting. You know, he's an economist, and he's He's a guy that they ultimately portray as a nut job, and a clown and a demagogue of of some sort. I don't think he's anything of the kind.
True to his populist roots, he flew to Davos or rather to Zurich, I'm sure on a commercial airliner. So here he is, you know, taking selfies with, you know, to just, you know, your average passengers, you know, on this particular plane, and then he went. He gave his presentation. He treated it with the solemnity of a statesman, but he basically, told them, look. You guys take your globalist, elitist, policies, which by the way have history has shown wrecked half the world and now threatened to wreck the other half of it, taking and stuff it because we don't want it.
Argentina doesn't want it. And and he's become a kind of populous rock star, not just for Argentinians, but elsewhere. But Some people watch this and they go, oh, wow. You know, he really stuck it to the web. Listen.
The wefers got from him exactly what they knew they were going to get. Just as they knew when they invite Elon Musk or they invite Donald Trump, they know what they're going to get. But you see, it's their way of of Trying to give the impression we're listening to dissenting voices because we are, above all else, we are imminently reasonable. But they're they're reasonable in that patronizing, condescending way of a government official at the give me. I mean, they're not listening.
If if that's point number 2. If you get nothing else from what I say here, the web is fundamentally anti human. And secondly, they are listening to no one, but Italy, they are listening to no one but to each other, which is to say that they're just simply, you know, in kind of a vacuum. And yesterday, I was doing an interview with Daily Wire and was asked, a very good question. Do I think do I think the left is aware that they have a oh, a PR problem and that that more and more people are waking up to who they are And what they're about, are they nervous about that?
My answer to that is no. I don't think they're remotely nervous about it, and that's because they see themselves and there's truth in this that the people who are waking up and dissenting with their agenda are generally speaking, not people in power. They're They're commoners. They're common people. It's why they have sought to demonize the word populous.
The The way the media uses the word populist is to suggest that it's fascism, it's Nazism. The irony is they're They're the fascists, not not the populist. Populism is just is just common people. It's just a movement, a grassroots movement of common people. And that can be good or that can be bad.
That can be a rioting or that could be the American revolution. You know? So, it's it's it's a mixed bag, but it just Simply means a movement of ordinary people. And and guys like Georgia Maloney in Italy, women, I should say, like her, Javier Malay and Argentina and Donald Trump all represent populist movements, and there Brothers that are taking place around the world. I mean, as I speak in, all over Europe, you have an uprising of farmers who are Who are standing up and saying enough is enough.
It's like the Canadian truckers. It's like January 6th, which Which has been characterized, mischaracterized as some kind of riot, and an an attempted insurrection, which, of course, it wasn't. They're just people saying, listen. Listen to us. Would you please listen to us?
Speaker 3: We don't like the policies
Speaker 0: that you are implementing and that you are forcing down on the rest of us. And who are those people? They're the kind of people that that I just left behind in Davos at the World Economic Forum. They're so detached From real life, they do not know what life is like for ordinary people. Many of them have been in in government like John Kerry for decades.
So they just don't have any clue what life is like for ordinary people. At worst, they don't care. So So what does the WEF fear? I definitely come away from the World Economic Forum feeling like there are 2 things that they fear, with a kind of mortal danger. They they see as, as the only things that can interrupt their plans.
And and interestingly, those two things have only one thing in common. They are not alike, but they only have only one thing in common, And that's Donald Trump on the one hand,
Speaker 2: and it
Speaker 0: is Vladimir Putin on the other.
Speaker 3: As I sit and
Speaker 0: I listen to the in Davos. They're not offended, not really, by the fact that Vladimir Putin He's a tyrant. He's a dictator. They're not offended by the fact that he rigs elections. I mean, these are all things they do.
They're not offended by any of that at all. They're offended by the fact that he is not on board with the globalist agenda, and that is why they are prepared to fight him to the very last for hating him. And that's what they're that's what they're prepared to do. That's why they feel the need to top because he stands in the way of their plans. Now this doesn't mean you you should be a Vladimir Putin fan.
You shouldn't. He's a Tater. But in this regard, I'm with him. I agree with him on on this point, but Not to the point that I'm I'm on board with Vladimir Vladimir Putin, who is unquestionably a tyrant. But what's fascinating about Putin is that he recognizes in all these weapons, their corruption because It's who he is.
I mean, it's it's a thief recognizing another thief. It's a criminal recognizing another criminal, and they recognize it in him too. And that brings me to Donald Trump. They wanna make him look like he's a criminal. But what offends them about him is that Donald Trump was one of them in the sense that here he is, you know, with his with his background.
He's a he's a billionaire, a New Yorker, New Jersey, A businessman, blue states. At one time, he supported financially candidates like Bill and Hillary Clinton, I'm not particularly pro life in my opinion, although his policies are by far those pro life policies of any president in modern History. None of that stuff offends them about him. Not his not his sex life. They they'll say that it is.
That's not what offends them either. What offends them about him is that he He's not on board with the globalist agenda, and therefore, both Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, they fear them both, and they feel the need to destroy them both. That is what's going on. But at the left, because they reasonable above all things. They would happily give a, a session, the stage to a Donald Trump very briefly briefly and to a Javier Malai and a Georgio Maloney to people like this to show just how they are.
So next time I check-in with you, maybe at the airport, probably will in London where I'm hoping it's a much better hotel. I basically stayed in a motel here. Door opened to the outside, but the bubbles were very thin. I can hear everything that was going on Next to me, and I'm sure, you know, nothing else exposed me as a, you know, as a kind of bull in the web. It was the fact that I had to do most My interview my television interviews from my hotel room.
Because there was nowhere else really for me to do it.
Speaker 2: And because the walls
Speaker 0: are thin, I'm sure there were people So let's think to absolutely everything that I would say.
Speaker 3: Just a few thoughts for you as I Reflect on my time at the forum. There are a few things you can only get from the experience By being there, there's I've always found there's no substitute for actually being in a place. As you know, if you
Speaker 0: go to a sporting event For
Speaker 3: concert, the experience is very different than if you were watching it online or just listening to it on your iPhone. Well, in the case of the World Economic Forum, one of the things that you certainly cannot get From watching it online is the fact that the forum has a kind of quality See, that to me, and some will say that this is an extreme comparison, but you you have to be there. It to me feels a little bit what I imagine the nuts and brownies in Nurofen must have felt like in In the 19 thirties, I mean, it has the same kind of, oh, worshipful Neil Pagan ethos, you know, doing my interview with Dinesh D'Souza. He was asking me, you know, is you know, what is the e false like. Well, it is a it is a shared one, and it's pagan in nature and it's completely unified to the point that it's it's almost like Stepford.
It's as though no one really questions the agenda. They've all bought into it on everything from Vaccines to depopulation to the end of industrial farming, all of it. And, and I find that very unsettling because there needs to be people who are asking the hard questions and who We're very seriously evaluating what's going on there, and it feels to me like almost no one really is. Now I should say that there are others there like, say, Rebel News, and I really appreciate their work. Now their approach is exactly the opposite of mine.
They wanna make their presence felt as strongly as Possible at the forum. Their harassment of John Kerry was just simply awesome. I loved it. Now For my own part, I want to go essentially unnoticed at the forum. Ladies.
And, to move really unseen among them, then I might really question the agenda,
Speaker 0: but that's not an easy thing to
Speaker 3: do at a place like Davos. Run it across Piccadilly. Those are just some thoughts for you about the World Economic Forum and the The experience of actually being in that place.
Speaker 0: I wanna thank those of you who are listening or watching, I who are supportive of my work, you make these things happen. You make it possible. So I'm grateful for you, and I'm grateful for your prayers. Listen, all of you take care.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Dr. David Martin's address to the European Parliament is one of the best presentations I've ever seen. He's been spot-on about COVID at so many levels. I highly suggest you give him a follow: --> @DrDMartinWorld https://t.co/uWTYPIjpPN
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had on humanity. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. The speaker then delves into the history of coronavirus, highlighting its manipulation and modification for various purposes since 1965. They discuss the patenting of infectious replication-defective clones of coronavirus, the failure of vaccines against coronavirus, and the involvement of organizations like Pfizer and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. The speaker accuses the CDC of violating biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. They conclude by calling for an end to gain-of-function research and corporate-controlled science.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is a particularly interesting location for me to be sitting today given that over a decade ago, I sat in this very chair right here in the European Union Parliament. And at that time, I warned the world of what was coming. During that conversation that was hosted at the time by the Green and EFA and a number of the other parties the European Union's, various representations, we were having a conversation on whether Europe should adopt the United States' policy of allowing for the patents on biologically derived materials. And at the time, I urge this body and I urge people around the world that the weaponization of nature against humanity had dire consequences. Tragically, I sit here today, with that unfortunate line that I don't like to say, which I told you so.
But the fact of the matter is we're here not for a reprisal on past decisions, we're here to actually once again come to the face of the human condition and ask the question, who do we want to be? What do we want humanity to look like? And rather than seeing this as an exercise in futility, which is very easy from time to time when you're in the position I'm in, I actually see this not as an exercise in futility. I see this as one of the greatest opportunities that faces us because we now have a public conversation, which is now front and center in people's minds. When this was an esoteric conversation about biological patents, nobody cared.
But when that conversation came home, then it became something people can care about. So I'm actually quite grateful for this opportunity. I thank the members of parliament for hosting this. I thank all of the translators who I apologize in advance, I will use terminology that is probably very difficult to translate, so my apologies. I'd also like to acknowledge the fact that many of you are aware of my involvement with this in large part due to the amazing work of my wonderful wife, Kim Martin, who encouraged me at the very early days of this pandemic to get on front of the camera and talk about all the information that I had been sharing among very small groups around the world.
And it was, in fact, her encouragement that put me in a place where many of you I've heard what I have to say. Ironically, the world that I came from that used to be very popular, my CNBC and Bloomberg presentations, which were televised on mainstream media around the world, was patients, which were televised on mainstream media around the world, was an audience that I lost. I can confidently say COVID diminished my fame, but I can also confidently say that I'd rather stand among the people with whom I'm standing today than any of the folks that were part of that previous world. So this is a much better place to be. My role today is to set the stage for this conversation in a historical context, because this did not come in the last 3 years.
This did not come in the last 5 or 6 years. This actually is an ongoing question that probably began here in Europe in the early stages of the mid 1900, but certainly by 1913, 1914, this conversation started right here in Central Europe. The pandemic that we alleged to have happened in the last few years also did not happen overnight. In fact, the very specific pandemic using coronavirus began in a very different time. We'll try to advance the slides here with one of these things.
Oh, there we go. Most of you don't know that coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of the human condition, it was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold. But what's particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons. And you heard me correctly.
That was 1965. And by the way, these slides are public domain. You're welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material, so do make sure that you look at those references. But in 1966, the very first COV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation.
And you heard the date, 1966. I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that's been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.
And in 1967, the year I was born, we did the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus. Isn't that amazing? 56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that's been 56 years in engineering. And I want that to chill with all of you. Where were we when we actually allowed, in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties, where were we as a human civilization, when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for the United States and infect the world with it?
Where was that conversation? And what should have been that conversation in 1967? That conversation wasn't had. Ironically the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s and in 1975, 1976, and 1977 we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals, pigs and dogs, and not surprisingly by the time we got to 1990 we found out that coronavirus as a infectious agent was an industrial problem for 2 primary industries, the industries of dogs and pigs. Dog breeders and pigs found that coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems and that became the basis for Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine patent filed, are you ready for this, in 1990.
Did you hear what I just said? 1990, Operation Warp Speed? I'm sorry. Where's the warp and the speed? Pfizer 1990, the very first spike protein vaccine for coronavirus.
Isn't that fascinating? Isn't it fascinating that we were we were told that, well, the spike protein is a new thing. We just found out that that's the problem. No. As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out it was not just now the problem.
We found that out in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in 1990 for the spike protein of coronavirus. And who would have thought, Pfizer, clearly the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health. Clearly, Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber and at every chamber of every government around the world, not that Pfizer. Certainly they wouldn't have had anything to do with this. But, oh, yes, they did.
And in 1990, they found out that there was a problem with vaccines, they didn't work. Do you know why they didn't work? It turns out that coronavirus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes and it mutates over time as a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 until 2018, every single publication concluded that coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. And since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science ladies and gentlemen.
That's following the science. Following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said it doesn't work. And there are thousands of publications to that effect, not a few hundred, and not paid for by pharmaceutical companies. These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows unequivocally, including efforts of the chimera modifications made by Ralph Barrick and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, all of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus. That's the science and that science has never been disputed.
But then we had an interesting development in 2002 and this data is most important because in 2002 the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. Listen to those words infectious replication defective. What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you. Infectious replication defective means a weapon.
It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other individuals. That's what infectious replication defective means. And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 2002, and that work patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill mysteriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year. Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1.0 wasn't from a wet market in Wuhan? Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill?
No. I'm not suggesting it, I'm telling you that's the facts. We engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold.
It's called influenza like illness. It's called gastroenteritis. That's the naturally occurring coronavirus. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings and they patented it in 2002. And in 2003, giant surprise, the CDC filed a patent on coronavirus isolated from humans in violation once again of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws that we have in the states and I'm very precise on this.
The United States likes to talk about its rights and everything else and the rule of law and all the nonsense that we like to talk about, but we don't ratify treaties about, I don't know, defending humans. We conspicuously avoid that. We actually have a great track record of advocating for human rights and then denying them when it comes to actually being part of the international community, which is a slightly problematic thing. But let's get something very clear. When the CDC in April of 2003 filed the patent on SARS coronavirus isolated from humans, what did they do?
They downloaded a sequence from China and filed a patent on it in the United States. Any of you familiar with biological and chemical weapons treaties knows that's a violation. That's a crime. That's not an innocent oops. That's a crime.
And the United States Patent Office went as far as to reject that patent application on two occasions until the CDC decided to bribe the patent office to override the patent examiner to ultimately issue the patent in 2007 on SARS coronavirus. Let's not let that get away from us because it turns out that the RT PCR, which was the test that we allegedly were going to use to identify the risks associated with coronavirus was actually identified as a bioterrorism threat by me in the European Union sponsored events in 2002,003, 20 years ago, that happened here in Brussels and across Europe. In 2005, this particular pathogen was specifically labeled as a bioterrorism and bioweapon platform technology. Described as such, that's not my terminology that I'm applying to it. It was actually described as a bioweapons platform technology in 2,005.
From 2,005 onwards, it was actually a biowarfare enabling agent, its official classification from 2,005 forward. I don't know if that sounds like public health to you. Does it? Biological warfare enabling technology, that feels like not public health, that feels like not medicine, that feels like a weapon designed to take out humanity. That's what it feels like, and it feels like that because that's exactly what it is.
We have been lured into believing that EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and all of these organizations are what we should be pointing to, but we've been specifically requested to ignore the facts that over $10,000,000,000 have been funneled through black operations through the check of Anthony Fauci and a side by side ledger where NIAID has a balance sheet and next to it is a biodefense balance sheet, equivalent dollar for dollar matching that no one in the media talks about and it's been going on since 2,005. Our gain of function moratorium, the moratorium that was supposed to freeze any efforts to do gain of function research. Conveniently in the fall of 2014, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received a letter from NIAID saying that while the gain of function moratorium on coronavirus in vivo should be suspended because their grants had already been funded, they received an exemption. Did you hear what I just said? A biological weapons lab facility at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received an exemption from the gain of function moratorium so that by 2016 we could publish the journal article that said SARS coronavirus is poised for human emergence in 2016.
And what, you might ask, Dave, was the coronavirus poised for human emergence? It was WIV1, Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1, poised for human emergence in 2016 at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, such that by the time we get to 2017 and 2018 the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community: there is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. The operative word obviously in that phrase, the word release. Does that sound like leak? That sound like a bat and a pangolin went into a bar in the Wuhan market and hung out and had sex and and low and behold we got SARS CoV 2?
No. Accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was the terminology used and four times in April of 2019, 7 months before the allegation of patient number 1, 4 patent applications of Moderna were modified to include the term accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen as the justification for making a vaccine for a thing that did not exist. Keep going. If you have not done so, please make sure that you make reference in every investigation to the premeditation nature of this because it was in September of 2019 that the world was informed that we were going to have an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen so that by September 2020 there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal vaccine template. That's their words right in front of you on the screen.
The intent was to get the world to accept a universal vaccine template and the intent was to use coronavirus to get there. And the last slide. This isn't advancing, so if I could have somebody to do this. Let's let's read this because we have to read this into the record everywhere I go. Until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at the just disease crisis is very real, present, and at the emergency threshold, that is often largely ignored.
To sustain the funding based beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. Sounds like public health?
Sounds like the best of humanity? No, ladies and gentlemen. This was premeditated domestic terrorism stated at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015, published in front of them, this is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race and it was admitted to in writing that this was a financial heist and a financial fraud, investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process. Let me conclude by making 5 very brief recommendations. The last slide.
Nature was hijacked. This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decide to start manipulating it. Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and their equivalent organizations around the world, we didn't have independent science, we had hijacked science. And unfortunately, there was no moral oversight in violation of all of the codes that we stand for. There was no independent financially disinterested independent review board ever empaneled around coronavirus, not once.
Not once, not since 1965, we do not have a single independent IRB ever empaneled around coronavirus. So morality was suspended for medical countermeasures, and ultimately humanity was lost because we decided to allow it to happen. Our job today is to say no more gain of function research, period. No more weaponization of nature, period. And most importantly, no more corporate of science for their own self interest unless they assume 100% product liability for every injury and every death that they maintain thank you very much.
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
DECODING DAVOS: THE GLOBAL ENDGAME New Documentary 2023 I believe we are rapidly gaining ground in this war. But for everyone to participate and operate properly, you must understand the enemy. Let get knee deep into the mud of the WEF and its Satanic leader Klaus Schwab. https://t.co/EpdS3xI6wl
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the Davos class and their agenda for global control. They use events like the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change to push their plans for a one-world government and stakeholder capitalism. The Davos class includes powerful individuals and organizations who want to reshape the world and control every aspect of human life. They promote public-private partnerships and collectivism to achieve their goals. The video warns against trusting these elites and emphasizes the importance of resisting their agenda. The ultimate aim is to create a global surveillance state and merge humans with machines. The video urges viewers to be aware and take action to protect their freedom and independence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1984 is, I believe, a quite terrifying masterpiece. So terrifying, in fact, I don't think I should like to read another like it.
Speaker 1: I think that allowing for the book being after all a parody, something like 1984 could actually happen. This is the direction the world is going in at the present time. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.
Speaker 2: George Orwell's chilling line about a boot stomping on your face forever is very close to its ultimate fulfillment. You see, the people who boldly announce that by 2030, you'll own nothing and be happy and that you'll merely rent whatever you need met during the week of January 25, 2021. To discuss plans for a total reshaping of the planet. That's right. I'm talking about the World Economic Forum, also known as the Davos class.
The conference kicked off with remarks from Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, who claimed 2021 is a pivotal and crucial year for our future.
Speaker 3: We are here together in 2021, which I consider a pivotal year, a crucial year for our future. We have the chance to move out with vaccines of the hot face of the COVID crisis and to rebuild our economies, but we have to do so in a way that our economy and our society will be more resilient, more inclusive and more sustainable.
Speaker 2: The week long conference was attended by representatives from government, banking, business, academia, media, big tech, and big pharma. Some of the more notable speakers included doctor Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Tedros Adhanam Ghebreyesus, Krystalina Georgieva, Al Gore, John Kerry, Christine Lagarde, Angela Merkel, Sundar Pichai, and Rajeev Shah. There were also special addresses delivered by Antonio Gutierrez, Emmanuel Macron, Benjamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Ursula von der Leyen, and Xi Jinping.
Speaker 4: Public health emergencies like COVID nineteen may very well recur, And global public health governance needs to be enhanced. The Earth is our one and only home. To scale up efforts, address climate change, and promote sustainable development bears on the future of humanity. No global problem can be solved by any one country alone. There must be global action, global response, and global cooperation.
Speaker 2: The 7 main themes of this year's Davos meeting were how to save the planet, fairer economies, tech for good, society and future of work, better business, healthy futures, and beyond geopolitics. Sounds good. Right? Well, if you would like everything in your life decided by a cabal of rich, self congratulating, well connected insiders, then I'm sure it sounds wonderful. For the rest of us who value independence, freedom, and privacy, Davos' goal of saving the planet and transforming society sound more like authoritarian battle cries, the likes of which even George Orwell would be horrified by?
Davos' front man, Klaus Schwab, has openly stated that the COVID 19 pandemic was the perfect opportunity to reimagine our world and even wrote an entire book about how to do it. In fact, Schwab proudly proclaimed the world would never go back to normal after the pandemic as if this was an awful thing.
Speaker 3: So people assume, we are just going back, to the good old world which we had, and everything will be normal again in how we are used to normal in the old fashion. This is, let's say, fiction. It will not happen. See see, cut, which we have now, is much too strong, in order not to leave traces.
Speaker 2: In his book, Schwab doubled down on his stance of not returning to normal. Predictably, Schwab wasn't the only one who felt this way. He was joined by many government and business leaders who eerily began echoing almost the exact same statements in the media.
Speaker 5: I want to be straight with you. There will be no return to the old normal for the foreseeable future. I repeat, there will be no return to the old normal for the foreseeable future.
Speaker 6: If you're talking about getting back to a degree of normality, which resembles where we were prior to COVID, it's gonna be well into 2021, maybe even towards the end of 2021.
Speaker 7: Realistically, COVID 19 will be here for the next 18 months or more. We will not be able to return to normalcy until we find a vaccine or effective medications. I know that's dreadful news to hear. How are people supposed to find work if this goes on in some form for a year and a half? All that economic pain worth trying to stop COVID nineteen.
The truth is we have no choice. We cannot return to normal until there's a vaccine.
Speaker 2: It was Schwab's World Economic Forum, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security that sponsored event 201 back in October 2019. This pandemic preparedness exercise presented an almost carbon copy of what would take place in real life just a few months later.
Speaker 0: It began in healthy looking pigs months, perhaps years ago. A new coronavirus spread silently within herds. Gradually, farmers started getting sick. Infected people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu like signs to severe pneumonia. The sickest required intensive care.
Many died. At first, the spread was limited to those with close contacts, health care personnel, coworkers, and families, but now it's spreading rapidly throughout local communities.
Speaker 8: Without a question, epidemic risk has become a global strategic concern. I don't think we've ever been in a situation where we have had to respond to so many health emergencies at once. This is a new normal. The scenario you will be presented with this morning could easily become 1 shared reality, one day. I fully expect that we will be confronted by a fast moving, highly lethal pandemic of respiratory pathogen.
Question is, are we prepared to globally respond to the next major pandemic event?
Speaker 2: The
Speaker 9: question of the Pandemic Emergency Board is to provide recommendations to deal with the major global challenges arising in response to an response to an unfolding pandemic. The Board is comprised of highly experienced leaders from business, public health and civil society.
Speaker 10: We could be
Speaker 11: looking at double the number of cases in 1 week and 16 times as many in a month if we are not able
Speaker 12: to stop the spread.
Speaker 11: That would be on the order of half a 1000000 cases, and it would continue to rise exponentially. In 3 months, we could be approaching 10,000,000 cases.
Speaker 13: We're at the start of what's looking like it will be a severe pandemic, and there are problems emerging that can only be solved by global business and governments working together.
Speaker 2: We'll leave the subject of the virus's true origins and nature for another time. But as the panel of experts predicted, everything did change and very quickly once the World Health Organization declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The very same day, the World Economic Forum announced the creation of its COVID Action Platform, serving as a blueprint for reshaping global economic response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Speaker 14: This is why we are launching the COVID action platform, a unique coalition that will address the crisis in 3 main ways. First, activate the global business community for collective action by improving coordination between them and sharing insights and best practices. 2nd, protect everyone's livelihood and ensure business continuity by sharing the latest tools to assess risks, maintain operations, and protect employees. Finally, engage business for the COVID nineteen response by strengthening the supply chains for medical equipments and funding the development of vaccines, treatments, and cures. There are many ways you can contribute and join the COVID action platform.
Speaker 2: Also released was the strategic intelligence platform developed to explore and monitor the issues and forces driving transformational change across economies, industries, and global issues. In other words, seizing control of everything vital to life on the planet and its population. With these efforts and more, the Davos class wasted no time with his plans to reshape the world. As former Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel and brother to doctor no return to normal, Zeke Emanuel, once stated.
Speaker 15: You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that, it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.
Speaker 2: But the real issue has always been about advancing an agenda to create a global government. The pandemic was the excuse used to accelerate this scheme. And, oh, what a scheme it is. But let's once again let globalist steward Klaus Schwab set the stage for the real mechanism that will be used to bring forth all the desired changes of the Davos class, fear. Again, it was Schwab who recognized that the spread of infectious diseases has a unique ability to fuel fear, anxiety, and mass hysteria.
Indeed, the fear induced hysteria from a public health crisis caused the exact scenarios event 201 had gained out just months earlier. COVID 19 served as a wrecking ball, unleashed to upend every facet of life. This worldwide social engineering experiment proved largely successful, as societies worldwide were transformed in a couple of months into totalitarian regimes demanding compliance with draconian measures enacted to stop the virus from spreading.
Speaker 16: In an unprecedented way, we see all of the governments around the world, with very few exceptions, all adopting the same policy at the same time frame. Right? This tells us that this is a highly coordinated effort, right, internationally, and that and it tells us that there is a group of people or individuals who are directing the governments essentially what to do. Right? And so this is very compatible with, you know, this globalist agenda moving towards a one world government and with tighter control over the population, with a reduced population, with a new financial, monetary and currency system.
And there's evidence for all these aspects. And I think the overall plan has been well laid out in the United Nations document, agenda 21, later changed to agenda 2030. There are many other supporting documents, like you mentioned, the Rockefeller, document, and and there are several others that essentially give all the details to this plan, and they all correlate with the policies that are taking place right now.
Speaker 2: In the US, it was billed as 15 days to slow the spread. Citizens consented to measures that prior to the outbreak would have been considered unthinkable, such as social distancing, face coverings, contact tracing, business closures, and travel restrictions. All aspects of life were totally upended. Fortunately, the death rate from the virus was nowhere near what was predicted in event 201. However, suicide rates, domestic violence, depression, and substance abuse all surged as a lockdown itself proved more menacing They knew it would be especially difficult on developing nations and minorities.
They were fully aware a crisis of this magnitude would further widen the wealth gap between the rich and the poor. They had foreknowledge of the extreme damage that would be done, and the toll it would take on human health, wealth, emotional, and spiritual well-being. But these twisted, sick, power hungry vampires will use all of this chaos as part of their endgame. Their hope is that by making these inequities more visible, you will readily accept their preplanned solutions. And this is how they plan to do it.
Speaker 17: I'm broadly scientifically literate, but what I was saying of this virus, I think we're in the middle of a massive experiment worldwide. And that
Speaker 18: words again, you guys?
Speaker 17: Maybe. The experiment is, will people listen to scientists? In in this case, referring to medical professionals? In this particular case.
Speaker 18: Say Anthony Fauci of Technology and Infectious Disease.
Speaker 17: For example? And, are you washing your hands? And are you taking these precautions? These are warnings offered by scientists.
Speaker 2: One of the main themes of January's Davos meetings was centered around building trust. In fact, Schwab believes that one of the most critical issues for their plans to succeed is a renewal of trust. The Davos class are pulling out all the stops to get you to agree with their plans. They can't do this smoothly without your trust. You see, this global game works by manufacturing your consent through sophisticated propaganda, predictive programming, and flat out brainwashing.
Unless you explicitly say no and do something to resist the plans of the Davos class, they'll take your silence and complacency as permission to proceed with their agenda. This is why they love to use words like inclusive, equitable, resilient, sustainable, multi polar, collaborative, and even social justice to make it seem like you're being invited to the table to help make decisions. In reality, all the decisions have already been made for you, and none of them are truly for your benefit. But the Davos class isn't stupid. They realize that many are on to their schemes and have even acknowledged that the great reset sounds like a nefarious global conspiracy.
So they're resorting to gaslighting tactics, like this slickly produced video, to get you to doubt your suspicions and paint anyone contradicting their narrative as a quack.
Speaker 19: With everything falling apart, we can reshape the world in ways we couldn't before, ways that better address so many of the challenges we face. And that's why so many are calling for a great reset. A great reset? That sounds more like buzzword bingo, masking some plans for world domination. Hands up.
This kind of slogan hasn't gone down well. But all we really want to say is that we all have an opportunity to build a better world.
Speaker 2: Yeah. They love to dismiss any reports of their wicked agenda as conspiracy theories. But this sort of propaganda is nothing more than a magic trick. It's street corner sleight of hand with professionally produced videos, reports, and clever marketing. They desperately want you to believe they care deeply about you and are appalled by any resistance.
How dare you even think to question them and seek out answers for yourselves? Trust the experts. Trust the government. Trust the bankers. Trust the science.
Trust the plan. Trust the Davos class. The COVID pandemic is just the first phase of the plan to get you to surrender to their objectives. So what else do they have in store? The diabolical plans to formulate a global government were fomented long ago.
The club of Rome has played a huge role in it going all the way back to 1972 with the publication of its report, The Limits to Growth, which essentially blames all societal problems on there being too many people consuming too many things. One of the primary ways this global syndicate of banking tycoons, intellectuals, scientists, bureaucrats, and their cronies plan to achieve their new world order was by promoting the threat of global warming, which today has morphed into climate change. It is the rules of climate change that's giving global technocrats the pretext to change the world by demanding net zero carbon emissions that would destroy the fossil fuel industry and completely alter the way the world operates. After centuries of running all of the industries that pollute the earth and fill it with poisons, They now want you to believe they have a plan to right all these wrongs. But the Club of Rome, World Economic Forum, and United Nations aren't the only groups advancing this scheme.
There's also the World Government Summit among a slew of other organizations, think tanks, and governments working to bring about their dream of global government.
Speaker 20: This session, ladies and gentlemen, will focus on the specific types of enablers that are required to achieve sustainable development goals. The objective of this panel discussion is to share general and specific enablers that play a key role in supporting the achievements of the global agenda.
Speaker 21: Thank Thank you
Speaker 22: very much, and I'm very honored to have this opportunity to share our country's perspective, on implementation, the SDG's agenda. And I think that really this agenda is most ambitious and most complex global agenda, of international community has ever agreed
Speaker 23: upon. 1st, allow me to say that we are
Speaker 24: very honored to be here today with you. And, in Costa Rica's case, I think it's a combination of things that has enabled, the way we have advanced with the end of 2,030. Starting from our constitution from our second republic, it says Article 50 that we believe in growth, by the way, distribution of wealth and and also including other people and doing it all with while preserving the environment.
Speaker 21: My background is in geography and computers or geographic information systems. So I've been working closely with the UN to build what several of the previous speakers talked about, the information system or a federated information system for the SDGs. And essential to that is the question that you asked, which is about data sharing. So this system, which has been architected, is about national systems or national portals collaborating and sharing data into a global sys
Speaker 2: The modern offshoots of the Limits to Growth report are agenda 21 and the sustainable development goals of agenda 2030 developed by the United Nations. Is it a mere coincidence that a global pandemic happened at the start of 2020 just in time to usher in a decade of ambitious action and a bid to seize complete control of the planet? Is it by accident that this pandemic has also been used to propel the climate change agenda into overdrive? Another relevant question is, who gave the UN this authority? I never voted for Antonio Guterres, the current secretary general of the United Nations, or any of the previous ones, and I'm sure you didn't either.
But back in 1992, a bill was passed in the United States House of Representatives to commit the country to implementing agenda 21. It was sponsored by none other than current house speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and supported by current senate majority leader, Chuck Schumer, and senator Bernie Sanders. Though this bill never passed in the senate, many of its principles have been put in place over the years. No matter where you live, chances are your country has enacted similar laws without your consent. Concepts like social justice, universal basic income, and Green New Deal policies all stem from agenda 21 and when fully in place will do much more harm than good.
Thinking that most people are either in agreement with these plans or still locked into the matrix of false reality, the UN even had the audacity to create a website declaring a new world order with happiness, well-being, and freedom of all life on earth by 2050. It brought so much blowback that they eventually removed it. The Davos class and their globalist minions love to pretend that their plans will benefit all humanity while continuing to hold most of the world's wealth and resources within their own coffers. While they promise global equity, they never reveal that it means everyone will be equally poor and dependent on technocratic overlords for every crumb on the table. Over the years, many brave souls have exposed their attempts to pull a bait and switch and leave the 99% with absolutely nothing.
Speaker 25: We're we can agree that we're witnessing the great purge. It's the great concentration of wealth and power, the great reveal of willing dictators, the great reallocation of resources, the great digital revolution of the surveillance state. This is the agenda for the 21st century and beyond. It's the great rehash of the old plan. So I'm gonna start there.
UN Agenda 21, sustainable development is the comprehensive blueprint. It's the action plan, as the UN calls it, to inventory and control all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, energy, education, transportation, information,
Speaker 4: and all
Speaker 25: human beings in the world. It's an inventory and control plan. This is the agenda for the 21st century.
Speaker 26: So much is going on in the world. Everybody's chasing rabbit trails here and there. If if it isn't a virus, it's the vaccine. If it isn't a vaccine, it's something else. It's 5 gs.
It's this, that, and the other. People are chasing after every possible rabbit that I've seen in the last 10 years. And this is not necessarily productive because when people are chasing after the predetermined rabbits that the global elite wants them to chase after, they're not looking at the real target, the real enemy, the real people that are pulling the strings on our global system. And believe me, I'm gonna tell you today that I fully believe that the world, including United States, has been totally pumped and panicked by the global elite into voluntarily giving up our economic system that has supported the world for 1000 of years.
Speaker 12: So what is agenda 21? Also referred to as sustainable development, it is not an environmental movement. It is a political movement which seeks to control the world's economy, dictates its development, captures, and redistributes the world's wealth on a national, state, and local level. The process locks away land and resources from use by citizens and plants a central economy while controlling industry, transportation, food production, water, and the growth, size, and location of the population.
Speaker 26: The same people who brought us climate change hysteria, the people that produced the studies at universities and so on, they said we're all gonna die in 10 years or 12 years and the seas are gonna rise and the polar bears are gonna die and all that kind of stuff, that whole crowd is the same crowd behind the hysteria that we are suffering under today. The same people who told us under the climate change mantra that we needed to curtail or destroy our economic system so the world can survive, The very same people are telling us that the virus pandemic is going to give us all this death and destruction across the world. And what's the only answer? Shut down your economy.
Speaker 12: Today, you will learn how indoctrination is used to soften up the American citizen, to make them receptive to the transformation of a free world into a socialist sustainable development world. Think of all the commercial and nature shows you have seen pushing the green agenda. Think of all the articles our biased media rights pushing the green agenda. Even various churches push the 3 e's. Let's not forget the schools and colleges that have curricula that has agenda 21 ideas embedded that are designed to create good global citizens that are willing to give up their individual constitutional rights for the common good in order to protect the environment.
Speaker 2: At the heart of agenda 21, agenda 2030, build back better, climate change, and The Great Reset is Collectivism. As a pioneer of research into plans for global government, g Edward Griffin explains how collectivism is nothing more than clever marketing to get people to give up their individual rights and for countries to give up their sovereignty to global elites.
Speaker 27: Collectivism, as you just said in your introduction, is the underlying general ideology that is common to so many of the totalitarian systems of modern times. Communism, fascism, Nazism, all three of those have as, as their underpinning certain common, elements to an ideology that really they're the only things that you should be looking at. The names communism, fascism, Nazism, so forth, are just labels. But they don't describe anything. Collectivism is what we're talking about.
So what is collectivism? We don't have time for all of it, but we've been able to identify certain common components. One of them is the idea that the group is more important than the individual and that the individual, if necessary, must be sacrificed for the greater good of the greater number.
Speaker 18: Well, collectivism is generally, I think the word was initially used by Ayn Rand. That's the first, usage that I'm really familiar with. But it basically means any system in which the group is, elevated over the rights and importance of the individual. So anything fascism's collectivism, communism's collectivism, any sort of authoritarian system. They're all collectivism because they all use the pretext of the greater good for the greater number as oppose as opposed to the greater good for the individuals.
That that is what is elevated, the greater good of the collective and is always at the expense of the individual.
Speaker 2: One of the biggest takeaways from Davos 2021 was the constant call for public private partnerships to lead the way in achieving global change. This PPP buzzword is just a fancy way of saying fascism or the merging of corporations and government into one totalitarian entity. So what could go wrong with merging the efforts of global corporations like Bank of America, BlackRock, Facebook, Goldman Sachs, Google, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, Palantir, Pfizer, and Visa with government agencies and civil society. After all, according to Salesforce CEO, Marc Benioff, CEOs were the heroes of the pandemic.
Speaker 28: CEOs around the world need to realize they must manage for all stakeholders, not just shareholders. And there has been a mantra for too long that the business of business is business. But today, the business about business is improving the state of the world. And this is more important than ever. We realize that.
And so thank you, Klaus, for that. And we don't have to look any farther to that mantra than 2020 itself near the pandemic. In the pandemic, it was CEOs in many many cases all over the world who were the heroes. They are the ones who stepped forward with their financial resources, their corporate resources, their employees, their factories, and pivoted rapidly, not for profit, but to save the world.
Speaker 2: The scary part about all of this is that Davos men, like Benioff, really believe they're the good guys, and they really want you to believe it too. By cooperating with governments, these and many other transnational corporations have completely seized control of our food supply, economic systems, transportation, technology, media, utilities, natural resources, health systems, and entertainment industries. These powerful multimillion and $1,000,000,000 corporations have grown into a beast like system of control that dictates the rules of the game in each of their industries and are out to destroy independent operators. To deal with the growing backlash to the greed and control exerted by the Davos class of powerful CEOs and bureaucrats, Klaus Schwab has invented a new economic model called Stakeholder Capitalism, where private corporations are granted the role of trustees of society.
Speaker 3: It's companies with which drive innovation. It's companies, who, in a competitive way, drives the 4th industrial revolution, drive, social benefits, and so on. Now some problem which we have is when we talk about capital. We think of financial capital. But, actually, what you need for wealth creation is not just financial capital.
It's human capital. It's social capital. It's natural capital. So we need to to embrace a much larger definition of capital, and all those capitals create in a shared way, wealth and indirectly or directly for our country, prosperity.
Speaker 2: Along with the new book, Schwab has penned the Davos manifesto, redefining the role of a company to fulfill a broader role in achieving environmental, social, and good governance objectives. Schwab again attempts to gaslight the public into believing that corporations can become altruistic, uphold human rights, and level the playing field to achieve equality. This is like trying to convince people that a leopard really can change its spots. They are really trying to persuade us that the billionaire club is tired of operating soulless, money grabbing machines, destroying the environment, and really, yes, really, want to help the little guy. Be warned though because as the bible says, Satan's ministers love to transform themselves as angels of light.
And following this pattern, greedy globalists like John Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and, of course, Bill Gates, all transformed themselves into beloved philanthropists. It seems like this is also the future path of current wealthiest man alive, Jeff Bezos, now formerly of Amazon. But how can anyone in their right mind buy this, given that Bezos' company conspired with Google and Apple to remove an entire social media platform from the Internet. Big tech companies have obliterated free speech and it has nothing to do with the Democrat Republican divide. But whether or not you agree with the tenets of the Davos agenda.
On the surface, stakeholder capitalism sounds good, But dig a little deeper and all you're gonna find is a pyramid scheme with a smiley face sticker slapped on it while you still remain at the bottom. Stakeholder capitalism and the Davos manifesto will only serve to increase the control corporations and their billionaire owners exert over every area of the human experience. Davos' newly polished schemes would completely usher in the age of full technocratic dominion. They already proclaimed they want the 99% to own nothing. Why would anyone in their right mind believe this new wave of propaganda, promising that mega corporations will become instruments of good.
Speaker 29: This great reset is as serious and as dangerous a threat to our prosperity, to your prosperity, and your freedom as we have faced in decades with these powerful bodies,
Speaker 22: including the
Speaker 29: World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and even Prince Charles boasting, yes, boasting that when a few within a few short years, yes, their words, you will own nothing and you will be happy. Remember, this is not me saying this. This is them. A terrifying coalition of big business, big tech, and left wing totalitarians are so confident and so brazen. I mean, they just stole the US election so I guess they're feeling pretty chuffed with themselves that they are now promising.
You will own nothing and you will be happy. What they should have added is added is and we, the very rich, will own everything and be even happier. Of course, they will.
Speaker 2: The real Davos agenda centers around using the fraud of climate change to usher in a technocratic, transhuman, 4th industrial revolution, complete with autonomous vehicles, the Internet of Things, advanced artificial intelligence, smart cities and an Internet of bodies to connect all humans with machines. Yes. Schwab has openly stated that the future will challenge our understanding of what it means to be human, from both a biological and a social standpoint. The Davos class wants to control the land, air, water and every resource on the planet, including humans. It's why you and I and all resources on the planet are referred to as capital and stakeholder capitalism.
It's also why COVID nineteen provided the perfect authoritarian control. Without the guise of a pandemic where people were made to fear for their lives, they would have never been able to get this far so fast. Digital currencies, digital IDs, worldwide 5 g coverage, biometric security, and an advanced global surveillance state is the true endgame. The Davos Khan cannot be fully implemented without it.
Speaker 10: We are in Tallinn, the capital of Estonia. The Baltic country is home to 1,300,000 people and to one of the most advanced digital societies in the world. From eresidency to online voting to national ID cards, we're here to see how Estonia can be a blueprint for other countries looking to go digital. For our first stop, we went straight to the top with a visit to Estonia's president, Kristi Khelua. If you could describe Estonia's digital society to someone who's maybe never heard of it before, what would you say?
Speaker 30: You can apply for a passport. You can apply for a driver's license. You can sell your car and buy your car online, register it online. So most of the services in Estonia, when it concerns public service, is digital.
Speaker 29: Estonians realized because they embrace the Internet
Speaker 10: we are inside the showroom of E Estonia, which showcases a lot of the country's digital solutions. We're gonna take a look at the electronic ID and digital signatures. Every Estonian is issued a digital ID. Physical ID cards are paired with digital signatures that citizens use to pay taxes, vote, do online banking, and access their health care records. For a small country, the impact of the digital signatures has been big, saving the government an estimated 2% of GDP per year in salaries and expenses.
Estonia says 99% of its public services are available online 247.
Speaker 2: There's been a lot of talk about how much leisure humans will have once robots and artificial intelligence are taking care of the menial tasks people used to do. Many have bought the lie that the 4th industrial revolution will break freedom and a new utopian era. Maybe this will happen for the Davos class, but what will become of the 1,000,000 and even 1,000,000,000 who will lose their jobs and livelihoods thanks to all this automation. Perhaps, more future planned pandemics will spare them of becoming a serf or mere chattel serving the ruling class. Bill Gates sure seems to be thrilled with the possibilities.
Speaker 7: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's annual letter has now just come out. You both write about how this pandemic in your view will be as defining as World War 2. What are the key steps to take right now?
Speaker 31: Well, we have to do 2 things at once. We have to bring this epidemic to the to an end, primarily by getting the vaccine out in large numbers to the entire world. And we have to make sure that we're ready, because there will be another pandemic.
Speaker 18: Because there will be another pandemic.
Speaker 31: And there's so many lessons about, how we weren't prepared, how we should have handled things differently. And, you know, when that's clearly in our mind, those investments need to be made. First, we've got population. The world today has 6,800,000,000 people. That's headed up to about 9,000,000,000.
Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10% or 15 percent.
Speaker 18: We could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.
Speaker 2: Perhaps no one has laid out the true agenda of the Davos class better than the late Aaron Russo.
Speaker 4: The ultimate goal that these people have in mind is the goal to, create a one world government run by the banking industry, run by the banking industry.
Speaker 8: The whole the whole agenda is to create a one world government where everybody has an RFID chip implanted in them. All money is to be, in those chips. Right? There'll be no more cash. And this is getting straight from Rockefeller himself as they wanna accomplish.
And all money will be in your chips. And so any so and that is that having cash, anytime you have money in your in your in your chip, they can take out whatever they wanna take out whenever they want to. They say you owe us this much money in taxes. They just deduct it out of your chip digitally.
Speaker 4: Total control.
Speaker 8: Total control. And if you're like me or you and you're protesting what they're doing, you can just turn off your chip. You have nothing. You can't buy food. You can't do anything.
It's total control of people. And that chip's connected to a
Speaker 26: database that has your purchasing records,
Speaker 8: what you do Everything. Everything is in there. And so they want a one world government sir. People. That's their goal.
That's their intention.
Speaker 2: This journey has taken us inside the devious minds of those who believe they are better, smarter, and worthy of making decisions for the rest of us. Decisions that will take away all of our god given freedoms and plunge us into the depths of slavery and genocide. But it is we who need to be reminded to use the tools that god gave us to defeat the evil not only within ourselves, but also in this world. Though this is not a fairy tale, the lessons of one of the most iconic tales still stand true. To overcome increasing despotism, we need to stop cowering in fear and find courage like the cowardly lion.
We need to disengage from propaganda and utilize the full capacity of our brains like the scarecrow. We need to stop allowing them to divide us and have our hearts renewed and filled with love, like the Tin Man. And we need to awaken out of the dreamlike state we're in like Dorothy and realize what is really taking place. When we arise from the slumber induced by the media shills and globalist entities pulling their strings, we'll see that they're just mere men and women behind the curtain, trying to manipulate us, just like The Wizard of Oz. The only way they win is by deception, fear, and misplaced trust.
Speaker 1: The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one. Don't let it happen. It depends on you.
Speaker 3: We are truthers. We do not take shit from mockingbirds.
Speaker 18: You should have expected us.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
BOMBSHELL: Dr. Robert Malone Exposes Globalist Plan To End Humanity @RWMaloneMD https://t.co/QEXVkrokTo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential consequences if it were acknowledged that the US government funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engineer a virus that spread worldwide. They argue that the liability and political consequences would be enormous, leading to efforts to deny the truth. They also discuss the rise of populism and the use of social media to influence politics. The speaker criticizes the censorship and propaganda deployed by the US government and intelligence community. They argue that these actions are part of a broader agenda to control and suppress individual autonomy. The speaker expresses concerns about the push for globalism and central planning, which they believe will hinder innovation and destroy human culture. They also touch on the COVID-19 pandemic, the UN treaty on pandemics, and their thoughts on Donald Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What would happen if there was an acknowledgment that the United States government funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that, proceeded together with, EcoHealth Alliance to engineer a virus that spread all over the world like this. The civil and criminal liability would be enormous. The political consequences would be enormous. And so what we're gonna see is continued efforts on the part of US government, the European Union, the WHO, etcetera, to deny what is increasingly obvious. That's why they have to implement this, censorship industrial complex in the way that they are because this is the term existential crisis is overused.
But as, Mike Benz appropriately laid out on Tucker Carlson, What is going on here is, the rise of a populist movement, the use of social media particular in ways that it was not intended to lead to things like Brexit and the election of mister Trump, and, that that we now face the US government and state department and intelligence community now face the prospect of a growing populism in throughout the US sphere of influence in the Pacific Rim area, Australia, New Zealand, in Europe, European Union, the expansionist NATO positions right now are all under threat of the risk of a populist wave, particularly in Europe that may well lead to increasing pressure to reduce the role of the European Union, potentially having additional European states leave their European Union, and, that potentially would compromise NATO, the grand plans that have been implemented. And in the face of this truly existential crisis in terms of American foreign policy, as they face the BRICS consortium and the rise of the CCP and of Russia, Putin's Russia, and the Middle East, of course, the US intelligence community, the 5 Eyes Alliance feels that it's necessary to really pull out the stops and deploy psychological warfare and, censorship and propaganda on on their own citizens.
And it's no holds barred now. Anything goes. That's that's the thing. Anything goes on any of these crisis scenarios, whether it's climate change or infectious disease or, the energy initiatives, etcetera. All of these things are being weaponized in order to justify, as you point out, these identities identity passports, and, and the social credit system through, the Central Bank Digital Currency.
All of this is being rolled out simultaneously in a concerted effort to control the ability and willingness of people to act as sovereign beings, to act independently. This is the logic of transhumanism and the belief that substitution of artificial intelligence, robotics, and transhuman technology will give rise to a new species, a superior species that will supplant the human species. This is part of a broader agenda that really is a death agenda when you think about it. If you from the perspective of human beings is, they're promoting death. They're promoting death in all kinds of different ways.
And I argue we have to choose life. And I ask all of you to please consider this carefully. I'm of the opinion that, terminating human fetuses is unethical. I'm of the opinion that, using this kind of, technology, psychological warfare technology is unethical. But these people believe that it's all acceptable in the service of the greater good as they define it.
And, of course, the greater good as they define it is often biased by their own self interest.
Speaker 1: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visitinfowars.comforward/showandsharethelink
Speaker 2: today. Alright. Our guest for the balance of the hour needs no introduction. Doctor Robert Malone has been the most prominent out of a bunch of amazing prominent doctors and scientists that have exposed the great COVID tyranny of where the virus came from, the dangerous experimental shots that they call vaccines. And now 4 plus years into this, wow.
Total vindication about the Robert Malone and so many other great individuals that have gone public. We've had whistleblowers, the vice president of Eagle Health Alliance. We have, major senate hearings where Fauci's caught red handed in his own emails calling it gain a function. There is so much to catch up on because I I've I've I've I've I mean, I've met him once when he was here, talked to him a little bit when he was going on one of the other shows, but he's never been on my show. And and he's here, so I feel like I know him.
But I'm I'm I'm almost every day following the interviews and the breaking news, the things he talks about to really understand what we've been hit by. And now we have the UN treaty, that literally takes control of our sovereignty and our bodies. And Bill Gates is running around like a gremlin giggling saying another big one's coming, and it's gonna be much worse. And I've had articles where the UN's announcing along with the Davos group that the world ID will be based on a vaccine passport. So my big concern is we can't because humans have a tendency when they go through a trauma to just get over it and move past it.
But it's coming again. It's in the Rockefeller Foundation documents. It's in the the, you know, great reset documents. It's it it's all there in operational lockstep from 12 years ago that this is how they wanna bring in total corporate global dominance is virus scarce. Is is their main jewel in the crown.
They talk about cyberattacks and wars and migration, but the big jewel in the crown, I think Robert Malone would agree is this. So he can go wherever he wants. There's so many big developments, so many studies coming out, prestigious studies, government admissions of myocarditis, and it's not as just just terrible insurance company actuaries of tens of 1,000,000 dead. I mean, and it just gets worse by the minute and then all the anecdotal evidence. So I'm kinda ranting here.
Robert W. Malone, MDMS, one of the pioneers, the most sourced, main pioneer into mRNA. Been warning about it long before they even rolled out COVID because some of the problems with it, obviously. It's great to have you, doctor Malone, and we really appreciate you coming on today.
Speaker 0: Well, thanks, Alex. And I I just wanna acknowledge your leadership and, your ability to see your end corners. Again and again and again, you have been labeled as a conspiracy theorist and a nutcase or speaking, the truth that you were able to perceive earlier than many people. And I'm in your debt, and I think we're all in your debt for your courageous actions over these many years. You've been vilified and, denigrated and gaslit and and everything else.
I've received a small taste of what you've been through, and I don't like it very much. So I I certainly appreciate, and empathize with everything you've been through. And thank you for being the hero that you are and not backing down in the face of all the crap that's been thrown at you.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you, sir. But I think because I watch you all the time. I think you said it best. It's not even courage. This is survival.
We've gotta stand against this. I mean, this is a mass power grab, mass psychosis you talk about. So so you're really wide spectrum the expert on all this. Where do you wanna go first? What they did?
What's happening now? What what they're gonna do next? There's so many big developments. So I I I wanted to really try to give you the floor.
Speaker 0: Well, what I'm just back from Romania, and so I'm a little biased right now having been at the Make Europe Great Again conference, where we had a number of European speakers, conservatives speaking about what's going on here. And, I learned a number of things from the conservatives that were there. For instance, just one example, Alex, that you may not be aware of, the those that were representatives of the Alliance for Deutschland, AFD, conservative party, which is arguably the leading conservative party in Germany right now, would not allow themselves to be identified as, being AFD members or supporters because if they did be so identified on interview, they would be arrested upon returning to Germany. Right now, waving a German flag is considered to be a neo Nazi act. All over the world, there's an effort to suppress nationalism in favor of globalism.
What we're up against, as you rightly point out, is the weaponization of all kinds of aspects of science, infectious disease and virology being one of them. Weaponization in order to advance ulterior motives, other agendas. And those all those other agendas really wrap back around, as you point out, to control. Controlling people through a weaponization of fear, I argue, is fundamentally unethical. But it's what's being done.
It's what's being done by our government. It's what's being done by the European Union. It's what's being done by the World Health Organization. It's what's being done by the United Nations. And somehow, we have to stop this.
This is not okay to for governments to be using fear in order to control their populace, but that's what's going on. And, as far as I'm concerned, the COVID crisis is just a small example of a broader strategy that's in play here.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. Again, I have a trillion questions to ask. How would you describe the entire COVID event and and and the aftermath of it? And and then there's a staggering numbers of dead we see that's more and more not even being denied. Even corporate media is now basically admitting this, and and I just wonder what the fallout's gonna be.
Speaker 0: Good question. What is gonna what is the fallout from, this gross mismanagement of public health over the last 4 years? And, as you're alluding to, what we're seeing is that the deaths were not due to they don't appear to be due to SARS CoV 2 infection. There's actually a big discussion right now among people out on the edges about whether or not this is even a pandemic, whether or not we can call this a pandemic, because, all the excess all cause mortality seems to accrue after the vaccine rollout and these various dysfunctional public health measures, the use of Remdesivir, etcetera. And it doesn't seem to correlate with the onset of the infectious wave in 2020.
Furthermore, we have more and more evidence that this, virus was engineered. And, yesterday, we had Ralph Daszak Peter Daszak, I'm sorry, Peter Daszak testifying before the select subcommittee on the coronavirus crisis, of the house. And, Daszak repeatedly denied that there there was any credible evidence that this virus was laboratory engineered. He repeatedly insisted that it was from natural sources, a transmission from animal source to humans. But the preponderance of data is quite strong now, and the committee wouldn't wouldn't hear of this.
They're talking about moving forward on banning, mister Daszak doctor Daszak from any future research funding from the United States government, and there's active discussion of even holding him criminally liable. I think there's and I've been calling this shot now for a couple of months. The tea leaves to me read that mister Daszak, doctor Daszak is likely to be the fall guy here. The only question, I think, remaining is whether or not, mister Fauci doctor Fauci is also going to have to be held accountable.
Speaker 2: And didn't I see you predict that about a year ago that Daz would be the fall guy?
Speaker 0: Yeah. So, it's playing out exactly as I intended or as I anticipated, and no surprise because DASIC is outside of the government. The government U. S. Government has got a real problem as does the CCP.
The CCP and the U. S. Government were the prime movers here in engineering this and all the evidence points to the proposal that DASIC had written and submitted to DARPA, proposed the engineering of a virus and this SARS CoV 2 sequence, has the hallmarks of exactly the type of engineering that he proposed to do together with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. So we're in a situation, you can see forward on this, Alex, what would happen if there was an acknowledgment that the United States government funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that, proceeded together with, EcoHealth Alliance to engineer a virus that spread all over the world like this, the civil and criminal liability would be enormous. The political consequences would be enormous.
And so what we're gonna see is continued efforts on the part of the US government, the European Union, the WHO, etcetera, to deny what is increasingly obvious. But, I think that this, to its credit, this select committee is really pretty pissed off right now if you listen to the testimony. And the amazing thing to me was how bipartisan that was. Both sides of the aisle are looking to really hold mister Daszak doctor Daszak accountable for his actions. So I think that we're going to get some traction on accountability for the origin of the virus.
But so far, absolutely no accountability about the manipulation of data, withholding of data by the CDC, withholding of informed consent and key information from the general populace about the adverse events associated with the vaccine. I don't see how the US government comes clean on what they have done here in preventing the citizens of the United States from having, informed consent concerning the risks associated with these vaccines.
Speaker 2: Again, doctor, you're totally immersed in the law and then the developer of mRNA and and warned of it, you know, even before they launched COVID. So so you're immersed in this. But for lay folks out there, we're talking about major Nuremberg code violations that have gone on. You might wanna explain that. That that that's a caveat.
And then and then one other little question. For those that don't know, you obviously have seen you talk about it. You pioneered exposing it. Is in all these videos and paperwork that are public right before COVID was released saying, we're splicing all these viruses. We're doing all this.
It's gain of function. So we can make vaccines. And then we've got Fauci saying the same thing, and then they go to congress and say, I know nothing like sergeant Schultz. It'd be so easy if the justice department wasn't controlled to indict them for perjury.
Speaker 0: Precisely, and to hold them accountable for contempt to congress at a minimum. The actions of Doctor. Fauci regarding Rand Paul and is not only lying about the gain of function, but then attacking Rand Paul and gaslighting and denigrating and insulting a sitting Senator, that's just not excusable. That by and remember, Fauci is a serving public officer, the most highly paid public servant, exceeding the payroll, the the, annual pay
Speaker 2: And those exchanges are so arrogant. He goes, no, senator. It is you that is lying. It is you that is wrong. And then we got hundreds of emails and videos of him going, I'm holding a gain of function conference.
Gain of function is so good. I mean, he even uses that term. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And and it was fascinating watching Daszak, wriggle and writhe around, his attempts to justify that this was not gain of function based on a strict, interpretation of some written regulations that exist. So, that's that's what he's resorting to is basically blaming NIH for all of this. Again and again and again, Dasek threw NIH under the bus every time Congress tried to hold him accountable or caught him at one of his lies. And, you're right.
This is what this is all teeing up because they they now have a Barrack testifying. They use Barrick, Ralph Barrick from University of North Carolina, a former key collaborator of doctor Daszak's. They used his testimony against doctor Daszak. They have testimony from the acting director of NIAID, a person that took over Tony Fauci's position. They have testimony from the, temporary director of NIH.
They have caught, Tony Fauci's lieutenant red handed telling mister Daszak to use his Gmail account so that it couldn't be traced instead of using official channels. Sure.
Speaker 2: So we have obstruction too, but but if you didn't redfield about a year ago, He came out and actually threw him all of the bus and admitted, of course, it's gonna function. So the rats are leaving the sinking ship.
Speaker 0: Bob Redfield is an interesting character. I've known him for years. He is very much a lieutenant of doctor Gallo. And, Bob Redfield was the director of CDC through a lot of this. And he was more or less participating in or or not disclosing what he knew for a long time.
And the rumor was that Bob Gallo told him he had to come clean, and then he gave this stunning testimony as you say. I think it was sworn testimony in which he, admitted a a whole series of things, including that the 6 foot social distancing was arbitrary and capricious. They just made it up. He's he he officially disclosed, DOD funding, USAID funding that, the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology was coming from multiple government sources and that, the NIAID funding was actually a minority of the capital that was pumped into the Wuhan Institute.
Speaker 2: It's unraveling, doctor Malone. And and what you're hitting is the big enchilada. This is gonna cause social unrest. The whole world will turn against the United States. The liability will be in the trillions.
I mean, this It's
Speaker 0: already happening. Yeah.
Speaker 2: It's it's happening.
Speaker 0: Having come back from Europe, it's already happening. And, that's why they have to implement this, censorship industrial complex in the way that they are because this is the term existential crisis is overused. But as, Mike Benz appropriately laid out on Tucker Carlson, What is going on here is, the rise of a populist movement, the use of social media in particular in ways that it was not intended to lead to things like Brexit and the election of mister Trump, And, that that we now face the US government and state department and intelligence community now face the prospect of, a growing populism in, throughout the US sphere of influence in the Pacific Rim area, Australia, New Zealand, in Europe, European Union, the expansionist, NATO positions right now are all under threat of the risk of a populist wave, particularly in Europe, that may well lead to increasing pressure to reduce the role of the European Union, potentially having additional European states leave their European Union, and that potentially would compromise NATO, the grand plans that have been implemented. And in the face of this truly existential crisis in terms of American foreign policy, as they face the BRICS consortium and the rise of the CCP and of Russia, Putin's Russia, and the Middle East, of course, the US intelligence community, the 5 Eyes Alliance feels that it's necessary to really pull out the stops and deploy psychological warfare and, censorship and propaganda on on their own citizens.
The And
Speaker 2: and that's the civil war cultural that's a that's a civil war cultural stuff we see now. It's it's I mean, they flipped the switch.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. And and it's no holds barred now. Anything goes. That's that's the thing. Anything goes on any of these crisis scenarios, whether it's, climate change or infectious disease or, the energy initiatives, etcetera, all of these things are being weaponized in order to justify, as you point out, these identities identity passports and, and the social credit system through, the Central Bank Digital Currency.
All of this is being rolled out simultaneously in a concerted effort to control the ability and willingness of people to act as sovereign beings, to act independently.
Speaker 2: And what's incredible is if you read operation lockstep 2,011, the Rockefeller Foundation that's so integral to all the battle planning, said by 2020, 2025, we'll have so much unrest and so many issues against us. We're gonna need a big virus, and and so we're gonna break in a few minutes. But I know you don't like to speculate, but clearly it's man made. Clearly, they use it for a power grab. Clearly, they block therapeutics.
You I mean, committed crimes against humanity.
Speaker 0: I agree I agree to all those points. I I concur with all those points you just made.
Speaker 2: And and do you agree, though? I think you've already said this, but it's blown up in their face. It didn't go the way they thought.
Speaker 0: And that that's not dissuading them. So what there seems to be the belief that, they can control this information. I mean, you're the one that's pioneered this term, Infowars. They firmly believe that they can deploy modern psychological warfare technology with all the trimmings, what NATO calls hybrid warfare, and completely control the narrative by controlling everything that people think, feel, see, believe. And they're a long way towards being able to do it except for a few alternative media descending voices such as your own.
Speaker 2: But I think you agree. We're we're gonna break in a moment that there's a paradox though. The awakening has been happening a while, becomes cliched as James O'Keefe said last time, but it's true. It's going straight up. I mean, I would get a lot of hate.
Still majority support 3 years ago going to the grocery store. Now I go 6 months without somebody yelling at me and and call I mean, people are are really upset. People are awake.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They they, I in coming back from Europe, I'm hearing a growing wave of dissatisfaction with what has been done here and this is just the COVID crisis is the most egregious example. It's one that everybody can see and feel, and it's touched every family in the world. But, the transsexual agenda, the sexualization of children, the education agendas that are going on, this kind of, wokism version of Marxism, all of this is is going on at the same time, and people are taking notice. Is it a critical majority yet?
We're going to find out the key moment, I think, that's coming up is the elections in Europe or the membership to the European Parliament, which I believe is June 7 through 9, depending on the nation state. And, they're doing everything they can to shut down the populous Doctor.
Speaker 2: Ball, stay there. We're gonna come right back after this quick break, and we're gonna get into the great awakening. Also your book's amazing. Lies My Government Told Me forwarded by Robert F. Kennedy Junior.
Everybody get his book, Lies My Government Told Me at Amazon dotcom and everywhere else. We'll be right back with doctor Robert Malone. Please stay with us. Ladies and gentlemen, we're in a war against the globalist, and people can't identify who's a patron, who isn't. We wanna identify as prohuman and anti globalist.
We wanna let people know we're 1776 part 2. That's why I designed this amazing 17/76 red, white, and blue Gadsden flag shirt so you can support the info war and meet like minded people everywhere when you wear it. When you wear these shirts, it creates an amazing amount of energy, and it's quite the adventure. So get your 1776 shirt right now at infowarsstore.com, and get your team humanity Infowars limited edition shirt right now at infowarsstore.com. Ladies and gentlemen, this is antithetical, the complete opposite, what the globalists are pushing.
So get both the team humanity and the 1776 Gadsden snake shirts limited edition at info warsstore.com right now. Spread the word. Meet like minded people and fund the 1776 revolution worldwide. Alright. I could talk to doctor Robert Malone for 5 hours, and I know next time he comes to do Joe Rogan's podcast or something.
I'm a mile and a half away from Joe. We're good friends. He he'll hopefully come and visit us at studio because this guy just gets it all. He's got a wide spectrum understanding. And I and I keep saying I'm gonna I'm not gonna interrupt that I think of so many things to back up what you're saying that are just crazy.
But you got cut off talking about all over the world populist antiglobulus are getting elected. Europe, it's showing it's gonna just be a a a route, but that's panicking the system as you said. So they're starting wars. They're destabilizing. Please continue along that line.
And then wherever you wanna go I've got a 1,000 questions. But but wherever you think is most important plus the devastating numbers coming out of the millions of dead and and the UN treaty, doctor Malone, please continue.
Speaker 0: Thanks, Alex. So regarding the UN treaty, what we're talking about is the UN treaty on pandemics, particularly for the WHO. So, this is the WHO pandemic accords in the international health regulations of modifications. And what's in play here, it's going to be voted on quite soon, is a major grab for power, sovereignty and also financial power by the World Health Organization under the under the thesis that they've done such a good job in managing the SARS CoV 2 crisis, the COVID crisis, that they deserve more power and really global control for coordinating all future, pandemic responses and also that they have the right to declare whether or not something is a global public health threat. So they're going they seek the power or Mr.
Tedros, their Director General, to be able to declare anything as a major public health threat that he so desires, just like he arbitrarily and capriciously declared monkeypox a global health threat, and we've all seen how that played out. So this is a treaty, and it's also a modification of the international health regulations that have been proposed by Mr. Biden. And under this structure, what is proposed is that the WHO will be able to tell nation states what they must do and what their people must do, what drugs they must take, what vaccines they must receive in response to a public health outbreak. And, these public health outbreaks can be associated with anything.
They can be a climate crisis. They can involve, gun violence. It can be whatever it is that mister Tedros determines is a public health threat or public health emergency, and it's all part of what's called the one health initiative, which basically decides, determines that the rights of human beings are equivalent to that of all other species, animal, plant, etcetera. So, they can declare a public health, crisis a a international health crisis because they believe that there's a threat to a given species in the Amazon or anything they want, really. It is truly arbitrary, and it it truly is a threat to your national sovereignty, but that's only one of many threats.
I'd like to talk for just a moment about what is globalism. We hear this tossed around again and again about, globalism and the threat of globalism. Functionally, the threat of globalism is that of central planning. What they propose is that public private partnerships, transnational public private partnerships, which meet the criteria of Benito Mussolini for the term fascism, will have the right to determine how the world should be run, what you should do, how you should live, what you should eat, whether or not you live in 15 minute cities, whether or not you're allowed to travel on airplanes, etcetera. And, all of this is really global, controlled central planning.
What is central planning? Have we seen examples of central planning before? Of course, we have, the former Soviet Union. And I just come back from Romania under the dictator Ceausescu. There are many of these totalitarian dictatorships over time that we've seen that rely on central planning edicts.
And what they do is they destroy cultures. They destroy people. They destroy their lives. They destroy productivity. They destroy innovation.
This is the key thing that I wanna get across here is the reason why to reject globalism and central planning is because it is the it is the best way to prevent innovation. Central planning and global control will kill the ability of individuals and nation states to innovate to adapt to changing conditions. What they propose is based on a theory called Malthusianism that the world has limited resources. The global population of humans is outstripping those resources. This is why there is the depopulation agenda, etcetera.
And, these people believe that the solution is a central control, central planning, bureaucrats determining what everybody in the world shall do. And, by the way, the other reason why they wanna drive towards this, these large corporations, you know, Larry Fink, BlackRock, etcetera, I think we're looking at Larry right now, is that it reduces friction. It reduces the economic cost of transactions to have all cultures and all nation states homogenized in terms of their business practices, their rules and regulations, etcetera.
Speaker 2: And he just admitted the endgame is to cut off resources for depopulation. He said, it's good to depopulation. We wanna replace people with robots. That's a quote yesterday at the World Economic Forum.
Speaker 0: Yeah. This is this is, the logic that's been promoted. This is the logic of transhumanism and the belief that substitution of artificial intelligence, robotics and transhuman technology will give rise to a new species, a superior species that will supplant the human species. This is part of a broader agenda that really is a death agenda when you think about it. If you from the perspective of human beings is, they're promoting death.
They're promoting death in all kinds of different ways. And, I argue we have to choose life. And I ask all of you to please consider this carefully. I'm of the opinion that, terminating human fetuses is unethical. I'm of the opinion that, using this kind of, technology, psychological warfare technology is unethical.
But these people believe that it's all acceptable in the service of the greater good as they define it. And of course, the greater good as they define it is often biased by their own self interest. But the key thing, the reason why we cannot allow central planning is because it will absolutely destroy the ability of the human species to adapt to changing conditions and to innovate. This is the argument against Malthusianism.
Speaker 2: That's right. It destroys competition. It it's it's it's the it's an it's an and they know exactly what they're doing. I want you to continue with that, sir. And the time we've got left, I I I wanna talk about the elephant in the room, which is Donald Trump, but please continue.
Speaker 0: Well, tell me about the, what you're thinking about Donald Trump. Because right now, I'm a little perplexed with Donald Trump's various statements about, I'm I'm not a sup I'm not a, endorser of Bobby Kennedy. I consider him a friend. I think he's made a lot of great points. I think there's a lot of great positions that mister Trump has taken.
Well, I
Speaker 2: didn't mean to interrupt the incredibly important point we're making, but I'm famous for it. So I'm gonna stop, finish your point, then I'll bring up Trump. But, yes, I have made mistakes in 30 years on air, but never on purpose. I've never lied on purpose about, you know, any, you know, political issue. Maybe to my wife, I've lied a few times and so is she.
But other than I'm I'm honest about that, folks. But I never have moral struggles because it's so cut and dry. With Trump, I see him being persecuted. I see what's happening. I I know he's better in ways, but I don't really like lesser than 2 evils, and he keeps promoting the damn shot.
And so some days I come in here and almost just wanna completely attack him, but then there's the paradox of Biden and all of that even worse. And I'm like, okay. Don't wanna take arsenic or cyanide. Well, arsenic's better than cyanide.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm I'm with you. That's that's exactly the dilemma I'm in right now, and, it it is really unpleasant. We have 2 of the 3 candidates, endorsing the jab and the Well, well, well,
Speaker 2: but let's get back to that because I put the cart before the horse. Finish your point on globalism and this anti human plan and and and the and, it's the WEF. We're a posthuman world. I mean, this is beyond Hitler. Hitler just wanted to kill certain groups, and that was bad.
They're saying humans are crap, and it's all over officially. I mean, this is quite the declaration of antihuman.
Speaker 0: This this is a death cult. And, I think the west a good case could be made that the west is behaving basically as a group of suicidal or a suicide pact. All of this negativity and very dark planning, self blame, the dissolving of and rejection of culture, of religion, of ethics, of any standard moral principles. This is all, very, very dark, and it it is all part of this same initiative to drive towards what is believed to be some noble future in which one can upload one's consciousness onto the web, live forever. This, again, this is yet another example of narcissistic behavior on the part of certain individuals, particularly a globalist ruling class, to try to find a way to become immortal and to live forever in a digital reality that they will have made it played a key role in creating and, denying all the fundamentals of what make us human.
That's that's where this death cult is going.
Speaker 2: And as you said earlier, everything they're doing is blowing up in their face, but they're so delusional, megalomaniacal, dreams of rancor, narcissistic. They double down. That is the immovable object comes into contact with the unstoppable force. That is going to be explosive.
Speaker 0: And the question is, are people dumbed down enough at this point through the use of gaming and porn and all these other, methods that are essentially making us numb and resulting in a culture that is unwilling to work, unwilling to confront the reality of what's being done to them and in deep denial about what they've experienced and what is being deployed. And, Alex, I got to tell you, I'm not really optimistic at this point from what I see, except, when I traveled to some places, and Romania was one of them. The Romanians are actively resisting a lot of these initiatives. They are maintaining their own currency. They wouldn't give in to the, vaccine pass or green pass initiative being pushed by the
Speaker 2: Is it that because they have a more recent memory of tyranny? We're almost like go to market.
Speaker 0: Exactly. And and a lot of the former Soviet block countries have been a lot more sensitive and alert or awake to what's coming down. They can see it because they've seen it before and they know that you have to say no, you have to resist. You're this is we can people think that this is a conspiracy theory, that this is overstated. No.
We are in a war. We're in a war for your children, for your future, for your autonomy, for your ability to hold property, and we have to fight.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. I've done a pretty good job letting you talk about this. One of the best interviews I've ever seen in years are all amazing. Please come on for commercial free hour or 2 in studio whenever you can or, you know, on the weekend because those are huge shows where we're airing on the main show. But I'm gonna do what I said I'm gonna do.
We've got 12 minutes left to the end of the break, and and so I'm just gonna sit back. Maybe you can comment some on Trump. What do we do about him? Why won't he admit he's wrong? I know he didn't go as far as Biden, so I can halfway hold my nose.
But nowhere in my life do I struggle morally about a question to have my conscience telling me. But then my conscience also says, but don't go for Biden because he's so horrible. And I like RFK Junior, but I don't think he's gonna win. Plus, he's got some issues. And and so I want your take on that, and then whatever else you wanna cover in the final 12 minutes, doctor Robert Malone, it's been an incredible honor.
Please complete the hour, and and I would be very honored.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much, Alex, and safe travels. And I look forward to hanging out with you in person, sometime in the future. So my thoughts on, the current political situation in terms of the upcoming election, I am a supporter of Donald Trump. That's the truth. I also support some aspects of what my friend and colleague, Robert f Kennedy junior has to say.
I applaud his courage for speaking out. I encouraged him to run because I believe that was the only way he was gonna break through the wall of the press and their willingness and actions to try to defame and delegitimize him. And to a large extent, that's happened. The Tucker Carlson interview, for instance, was amazing and got huge traction, in in his interview with Joe Rogan, of course, was amazing also. But, mister Kennedy is fundamentally a democrat, and he believes in a lot of the fundamentals of 19 sixties Democratic Party, the party of his father and his uncle.
And a lot of those ideas are obsolete. They have been proven wrong, and, I think we have Ronald Reagan to thank for a lot of that. My opinion of mister Biden is that he is absolutely incapable of governing, is not currently governing, and and the autopilot policies that have been deployed during his administration are stunning. They they have just ground the constitution into the dirt. They don't seem to care about the Bill of Rights.
And this administration seems to be playing a game of catch me if you can combined with lawfare and a weaponized Justice Department. And if you need an example of that weaponization, you can look at the case of my friend and colleague, doctor Peter Navarro, who's currently rotting in jail, for contempt of congress, their actions against mister Steve Bannon, their actions in particular against mister Donald Trump, but against virtually every major conservative that was involved in Donald Trump's administration. It's these are bad times right now. So there's no way I can support mister Biden or anything to do with the Biden administration, which brings us to mister Trump. And I think that it's it's a real dilemma when when mister Trump came out with his statement president Trump, I should say, came out with his statement after Biden's State of the Union in which Trump, asserted that, the vaccine was a great success.
It's now going to be curing cancer, and took full credit for this and seemed to be kind of petulant over, president Biden taking credit for the vaccine and that vaccine technology. I I was really troubled by that because like many conservatives, I've been hoping that president Trump would come to terms with what has transpired during the COVID crisis over the last 4 years and, come to terms with the mistakes in his own administration of which the vaccine was only 1. But he seems to be doubling down on that. And, a recent true social post in which he attacked RFK Jr. For his positions on the vaccine really demonstrated that that this wasn't just a short term petulant response to Biden's State of the Union address.
This is a deeply held belief by mister Trump that, his success with operation Warp Speed, was one of the the capstones of his entire administration. What a shame because there's so many things that occurred in a positive way during the prior 4 years of mister Trump's presidency. And at this point, I still have to hope that we have another 4 years of mister Trump and his presidency. I think there's a lot of good that he can do, and I think that the trials that he's been through over the last, 4 years of this Biden administration, the attacks, lawfare, weaponization against him, the raid on Mar a Lago. It just goes on and on.
Wrap your head around what this guy has been subjected to. I find it stunning that mister Trump is able to withstand all of of this, crap that's been thrown at him. And so that that says to me that he does have the intestinal fortitude to stand up to the administrative state. The question is, does he have a commitment to do so? Is he willing to really go to the mat?
Because I don't hear him campaigning on a lot of things that I would expect him to be campaigning on, such as, his actions previously, in creating a whole new employment category, Schedule F, for federal employees so that they would be able to be fired. They could be treated more like at will employees and be held accountable for their actions. I I don't hear him campaigning on that, and yet it was one of the most significant things that he did, unfortunately, immediately overturned by mister Biden, by, executive order when he came into power. Is mister Trump is president Trump, willing to take on the administrative state? He talks the talk, but is he laying out a campaign platform items that will result in a smaller government, a government that has been reprimanded and, acknowledges the fundamental nature of a federalist republic in which, states have significant roles and rights.
I don't I don't hear mister Trump, laying out policy positions that would be consistent with a, a reduced administrative state, and that is critical. I haven't heard I've heard him speak a little bit about defunding the World Health Organization. Is he willing to take on the United Nations? Is he willing to do the hard, heavy lifting that's gonna be necessary in order to break us free from this really consortium of Marxists that has taken over the United Nations? Is he willing, really willing to go to the mat with the World Health Organization?
Is he willing to repatriate American industry? Is he still committed to making America great again? And what is that commitment really look like? That's what I want to hear and I've kind of given up on my hope that I would hear mister Trump acknowledge the harms that were done by Operation Warp speed by jettisoning all the rules and regulations and, deploying these, uncharacterized vaccines that now the data are demonstrating are associated with, a major increase in all cause mortality. Interesting coming back from Romania, Romanians were among the few that refused to take the vaccine.
They had very, very low vaccine uptake compared to the rest of Europe, and they also had the best outcome in terms of all cause mortality. Now that's pretty close to a smoking gun. So is mister Trump gonna acknowledge what happened here? I doubt it. Is he going to learn from that and really try to hold the bureaucrats accountable?
I hope so. Is he better a better option than, mister Biden? I don't see any any doubt about that in my own mind and my own heart. Is he more experienced and skilled as a manager than, mister Kennedy? Absolutely.
And we need to have, as Steve Bannon puts it, a wartime president. So that's where I stand on mister Trump. And, I I wish, he would come clean on the jab, but I just don't think it's gonna happen.
Speaker 2: It's more important than ever to keep independent true media on air. And when you buy the products, that's what you're doing. And at least for the foreseeable future, we're still here. If things change, I'll let you know, but it's essential. You buy products at infowarsstore.com because it funds the operation, but that's a side issue.
They really are amazing. And I didn't know this. Somebody told me. Nitric boost I've been plugging for months has been sold out. Bestseller cleans out your blood, cleans out your cardiovascular system, does incredible things.
Doctor Mickiewicz has talked about how it's one of the best formulas out there. Everybody should be on it, young and old, black and white. It is back in stock. Got a big shipment of it in at infowarsstore.com for 40% off. So if I've been plugging it, you go there and it's not there.
I apologize. I just I need to, I I guess, get more briefings on what's in stock and what's not. But it it's it's it's now back in stock at infowarsstore.com or call toll free free, triple 8, 2533139.
@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante
The Covid Psyop Exposed and What Comes Next With Disease X #DiseaseX https://t.co/PGLD9MVw7A
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Tabak from NIH testified about gain of function research at Wuhan Institute. The conversation then delves into conspiracy theories about COVID, depopulation agendas, and future diseases like Disease X. The speakers discuss how to stay informed and empowered in the face of mainstream media manipulation. Jeff Berwick shares insights on meditation and psychedelics as "cheat codes" for expanding consciousness. The conversation ends with a humorous exchange about potential scenarios in a depopulated world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back. Well, a few of the criminals who perpetuated the COVID hysteria were recently called to Capitol Hill. Check out what NIH principal deputy director, doctor Tabak, had to say about gain of function during his testimony at the select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic.
Speaker 1: Doctor Tabak, did NIH fund gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute
Speaker 2: generic term, yes, we did because but this is research. The generic term is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it's not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody.
Speaker 0: It's not regulated because it's been determined it doesn't pose a threat? What kind of morons are running this asylum? Unfortunately, they aren't really your average low IQ moron. They're actually conniving and maniacal sociopaths. And actually, what was this whole trade for anyway?
Just to continue criminal enterprise? Or perhaps something otherworldly? Well, joining us now to discuss, founder of the Dollar Vigilante and Anarkapulco Freedom Fighter, Jeff Berwick. Jeff, welcome to the program. Thank you so much for being with us.
Speaker 1: It's truly a pleasure, Allison.
Speaker 0: Oh, well, it's a pleasure to have you. You know, Jeff, as we have seen time and time again, people can give testimony really worthy of immediate prosecution. Yet somehow, no one at the top of this whole scheme is ever held accountable for really anything. Right? Jeff, what are your thoughts on this gain of function narrative and this whole COVID narrative playing out in the media?
Speaker 1: Well, they'll never go after themselves. The entire structure of government itself, of democracy, of all of it, is a slavery system. And we, not me because I don't pay taxes or anything, but they are, most people are the are the slaves, and so this is all a big show. That whole thing, just a big show. Gain of function.
That guy could use some gain of function by the looks of them. But, the that that's a whole other that that's a total, red herring, because there actually never was any COVID. The the the whole thing was made up. It was a computer virus that never even existed, and so they're just throwing little things out there for the slaves. It's like, oh, we're looking into it.
Oh, he might have done some gain of function. That the people who do these things are doing so many things, so much bigger than any gain of function you can ever imagine. That this is all just to keep people in trance and, oh, who you gonna vote for on November 5th? Remember remember the 5th November, but, and hopefully you do the same on that date, but, yeah, it's all a show. They're they're actually trying to depopulate the entire world right now.
They're doing it through the vaccines. They're doing it through the, chemtrails. They're doing it through the food system as you can as most people know. Everyone's, like, £500 now. Fluoride in the water, television programming, mind control, through broadcasting, sending spells to you, putting, you into a hypnotic trance, government 18 years of government indoctrination camps.
That's why most people can't figure this stuff out. They've been too dumbed down. But, yeah. This whole thing's a show. The whole COVID thing was a depopulation agenda.
It still is. People are massive amounts of people are dying now. They'll continue to die as Bill Gates said. He said, you know, 2 to 5 years, you know, we should have the final solution. So, yeah, it's all BS, as usual.
I suggest everyone out there, if you if you don't know what I'm talking about, just watch the movie, The Jones Plantation. It's on Amazon Prime. It shows this how this whole system works, and it's all a scam. Just stop giving them your attention. Stop giving them your money.
Stop using their currency. Use cryptocurrencies, and they'll slowly go away. But they're gonna still try to kill you.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They sure will. They they don't seem to ever let up on on the ongoing psyops, and and it's it's really quite sad that so many people have fallen victim to, this agenda that just seeks to kill and depopulate. Right? I mean, that's what it's all about, I think.
And and sadly, so many people, just the masses, just go along with it without batting an eye. On that note, we know there's been talk of disease x. And currently, the corporate media is trying to get everyone scared of bird flu around America. But also the Washington Post just reported that we also need to be scared of monkeypox again. Jeff, where do you think this is headed?
Are they really gonna try to use the same tricks they did back in 2020?
Speaker 1: I guess you haven't heard. They came out with a new one now. It's the camel flu. It's, sneaking its nose under the tent as we speak. Monkey pug.
Yeah. These are hilarious. These are all just to distract. They're all made up. But disease acts is, very dangerous.
They talked about it at the World Economic Forum. That was almost the only thing they talked about. They've already got the vaccines ready. They're super, super smart. They know what it's gonna be ahead of time.
They already got it all made. The next one's gonna be the big one. Covades was, I call it Covades because it's similar to AIDS, which was also another, way that they killed a lot of people. Magic Johnson's fine though, because he didn't take the jab, but, they, the the disease x, I think, is going to be actually super super serious. I think they've already injected people with Graphene oxide.
They control that through frequencies. I think they're gonna use 5 g and maybe harp, which they just, made the Aurora borealis be seen all over the world with their frequencies the other day. I think it's gonna interact with the people who've already been injected with the poison, which is also an operating system as Bill Gates has said, and, they'll start dying, and people will fall for it again, because everyone will be dying around them. Then they'll rush out with the jabs they already got ready. In place like Canada, they're already getting ready to go door to door.
They've already got everything all set up. The COVID, as Klaus Schwab said, was just a, you know, testing ground. Bill Gates has said it as well. The next big one will probably be disease x, and it'll be probably 100 of 1,000,000 or 1,000,000,000 dead, and most people will fall for it and take the new jab, and that will kill them too. There might not be many of us left, but I'm hoping you're one of them, Allison.
Speaker 0: I I'm hoping so too. And I hope you are as well. So that, you know, we can keep these idiots informed. I'm just kidding. You know, the viewers are wonderful and they know what's up.
But but the masses, as we said, are truly the problem here. But you really think disease x is going, to be the big one. Do you think that's why COVID wasn't actually a real thing? Didn't actually kill anyone the vaccines did, of course. But COVID was just all hype.
Do you think they did that to, try to psych people out for when disease x strikes to make us think, oh, you know, all of these, you know, government, viruses are are just all a hoax. And then this one's gonna come and actually be the one that that wipes everyone out. I mean, was it all done to try to deceive us and manipulate us into thinking that it's not actually something we should be concerned about?
Speaker 1: There are so many levels to this nefarious agenda that they have so many things. But in general, the COVID was a test. And I I think they must have been surprised how well it went. I'm shocked. I never would have thought that you could just say there's a virus, put one video of a guy in China who looked drunk falling over, and put it on the television programming, and then say, if you go get a shot, we'll give you a donut or french fries, and, like, hundreds of hundreds of people did it.
I think they were even shocked. Even Frausey, doctor Frausey at the beginning, he was saying, oh, you don't need a mask. You don't need a mask. And then everyone started wearing masks, and they just ran with it. They're like, holy cow, now they're all wearing masks.
Like, they've got them under massive massive mind control. Obviously, a lot of people who'd watch your show, aren't those people, but there's 100 of millions or billions of NPCs out there, and they're going to depopulate them, which I think will be great in general. There's, you know, there'll be no more traffic, no more you don't need reservations at a restaurant. I I think in general, and like, you know, if it's you and me left, like this could be like paradise for me personally, once this is all over.
Speaker 0: I I agree. I think it would be a wonderful place that we can just, you know, go forward with the globalist plan to depopulate. It might might be a breath of fresh air, but of course, that would include depopulating the globalist as well who are trying to kill us through, you know, just simply breathing and existing. So, yeah. They would have to go.
But it could be a beautiful life if if it weren't for them trying to constantly destroy us. Jeff, how do you think people can stay above the influence of all of, the information overload from the mainstream media meat puppets? Are the indoctrinated, do they have any hope of getting out of this, you know, mass formation psychosis? Or, is is it all just downhill from
Speaker 1: here? No. Everyone has a choice. This this is a 3 d video game we're all playing. We're basically most people are still in the matrix part of it.
You always have a choice to, become courageous and, take risks and and open your eyes to true reality, which can be incredibly shocking for a lot of people. But people still have the chance. They always will. They wouldn't have been put in the video game if they didn't have a chance to win, but a lot of people are losing right now. I wish them luck.
They're too hard to even get through to anymore with the fluoride and the water and the chemtrails with the aluminum, turns off their third eye, television program, all that stuff. You can't even talk to them. They just give you the fluoride stare. So, you know, just stay out of their way as a lot of them are gonna be wiped out, and you mentioned, you know, it might be the globalists that are left with us, which will be just a really awkward period of time. It'll be like us and Bill Gates and, doctor Franci and Satan Klaus, and, you know, I'll be like, hey, like, you know, there's a lot of positives to what you guys did here.
It's, you know, everything, the the environment's a lot cleaner now. You you took out a lot of the useless eaters as you used to call them, but I'd I'd just tell them right then, listen, you know, I'm I'm okay with what you did, but you ever try to touch me, or my family or Allison, you're dead, and they probably just run off.
Speaker 0: I like it. I like your style, Emily. I hope we could live to see this day. Well said. We're almost out of time, but before we go, do you have any cheat codes for us?
Speaker 1: Oh, man. Well, we don't have much time, but, a massive massive cheat code. Well, there's a couple psychedelics and, meditation. Those will expand your mind, you'll be able to break out of the matrix. Now be careful with psychedelics, of course, but everyone can meditate.
I would highly recommend it. I just came back from a 3 hour meditation. Everything's crystal clear to me now, and those are the cheat codes. Once you get those, you get super powers actually too, but you gotta put in a lot of work.
Speaker 0: Alright, Jeff. Well, very insightful information. Thanks so much for all the great work that you do to expose the insanity, and thank you so much for joining us today. I really appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Pleasure.
@MattWallace888 - Matt Wallace
🚨 BOOKMARK THIS 🚨 🚸 URGENT WARNING: THEY ARE ABOUT TO SPREAD AN EXTREMELY CONTAGIOUS NEW XEC COVID VARIANT THROUGH THE UNITED STATES TO CAUSE A WAVE OF LOCKDOWNS BEFORE THE 2024 ELECTION 🚸 https://t.co/dzBsyNy9Qj
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Canadian man exposing the WEF's plans to enslave the planet. https://t.co/T6oLNuJ0qK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker asserts restructuring of Canadian municipalities under the United Nations began in 1992 after PM Mulroney signed onto UN Agenda 21, making Canada a UN member state; 178 countries joined for money to go green. By 2000, this view claims, countries were governed by directions from the UN, G7/G20, WEF, and WHO through unelected NGOs, with parliamentary procedures not followed. In 1994 a municipal primer allegedly instructed towns to restructure their governments; though nonbinding, it was widely adopted. Aurora’s officials allegedly partnered with the private Corporation of the Town of Aurora to implement the global agenda, with ICLEI/Zickley as primary consultants. A 2019 WEF-UN partnership aims to accelerate the 2030 Agenda; Klaus Schwab allegedly said, "you will own nothing and be happy," and claimed to have penetrated more than half of Trudeau’s cabinet. The speaker links the 15-minute city to surveillance; SMART stands for surveillance, monitoring, analysis, reporting, technology. They urge council to guarantee rights, exit the Aurora agreement, and dialogue openly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening. Restructuring of Canadian mayors and municipalities under the auspices of the United Nations began in 1992. PM Mulrooney signed Canada onto UN agenda '21. Canada thus became a UN member nation state. A 178 countries signed on lured by the promise of big money to go green.
By 2,000 countries, including Canada, were being governed by directions of the UN G seven G twenty World Economic Forum and World Health Organization to name some. Every organization named is a foreign based NGO, nongovernmental organization, and every member of all these organizations is unelected. Parliamentary procedures for law changes weren't followed. In 1994, a municipal primer was issued to all local towns outlining how they were to restructure their governments. Though the municipal primer was a nonbinding agreement, all towns adopted it.
Our public officials, the mayor and counselors of that day were partnered with a private corporation, the Corporation of the Town of Aurora, who appointed a chief administrative officer who helped implement the global agenda instead of a local one. The International Council on Local and Environmental Issues, Zickley, became the main source of consultation to push and fund the global agenda. We remind you that the World Economic Forum and the United Nations signed a strategic partnership framework in 2019 to jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This is the same World Economic Forum whose chairman Klaus Schwab famously declared, you will own nothing and be happy. This is the same Klaus Schwab who, referring to Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, boasted, we have penetrated more than half of his cabinet.
We would ask mayor Marakis and the counselors, why should the citizens of Aurora bow down to the intrusive dictates of an unelected foreign entity? The fact is we should not and we will not. What you asked does any of this have to do with fifteen minute smart cities? Absolutely everything. Smart, s for surveillance, m for monitoring, a for analysis, r for reporting, and t for techno technology.
Technology news editor Patrick Wood, fifty years of experience and expertise on technocracy wrote, the fifteen minute city is a cover for data collection bonanza for technocrats who design and operate them. Cities designed for maximum efficiency always reveal technocrat thinking that efficiency itself is the goal. Maximum surveillance allows for maximum control to achieve even more efficiency. At its very root, this mechanistic thinking is anti human. The fifteen minute city narrative seeks to fool you in the guise of saving the planet, keeping you safe, and delivering convenience.
It's actually the gateway to digital IDs and CBDCs, central bank digital currencies. CBDCs allow bankers and or governments to freeze your bank account because you happen to peacefully and lawfully protest and express your disagreement with government policy. Anyone remember the truckers convoy in Ottawa, February 22, when the government of Canada invoked the Emergencies Act and froze the private bank accounts of law abiding citizens. Fifteen minute cities are wolves in sheep's clothing. Don't believe the countless stories spewing forth from the twenty four seven basis from the elitist captured mainstream media, all claiming to have your best interests at heart.
We have been burned too many times. In reality, twenty four seven surveillance through the Internet of Things inside your home, five gs and LED street lights outside, monitoring and tracking and recording everything. Implementation of exclusion zones and geofencing to restrict movement and travel. Ability to control behaviors through military directed energy technologies. Property and car ownership to be outlawed, evictions from farms and rural areas to order gather people into cities.
Digital passports being promulgated by the UN World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization are in the final stages of planning and implementation. They are tied to social credit score, which is determined by compliance to government directives. These passports control all access and all aspects of life. Digital currency is being implemented to end cash and monitor all your spending. Your digital currency will be turned off or on depending on your compliance score.
UBI Universal Basic Income is a state controlled allowance forcing compliance by restricting access to food, money, services, and education. All of the above will enable climate lockdowns to be implemented easily, arbitrarily, and indefinitely. The real agenda of fifteen minute smart cities is to monitor and control everyone and everything. In summary, in the coming days, council will receive an electronic info packet which will contain the text of this delegation and other items. We, the citizens of Aurora, wish to enter into a meaningful respectful dialogue with our elected members of council on this complex important issue.
A key framework of that dialogue is a list of questions posed to council. Can counsel explicitly guarantee that citizens will be reigned free to travel as is their right under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Can counsel guarantee not to restrict access to essential services, medical care, bank accounts, government pensions, utilities? Most importantly, we, the citizens of Aurora, need to have the conversation with counsel about exiting their nonbinding agreement with the private for profit entity known as the corporation of the town of Aurora. We need to turn back the page to a simpler time when open, transparent, municipal government serving its citizens and working in their best interests rule the day.
We are your equal partners on this journey. Thank you. Thank you.