reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@JoeBiden - Joe Biden
Make no mistake: the situation with Iran is a crisis of Donald Trump's own making. He brought us to the brink of war with no plan and no strategy. He is the most erratic and incompetent commander in chief we've ever had. https://t.co/LkmJvh1FAn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The previous administration was leading towards war, but we are working towards peace. Iran threatens retaliation for the killing of its top general. Iran announces it will continue uranium enrichment, going against the Iran nuclear agreement. Iranian state TV shows missiles launched into Iraq. The situation is causing uncertainty and could escalate into a wider regional conflict. We are currently in one of the most dangerous moments in our lifetime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The last administration was leading the world down the path of war. We are restoring our world to the path of peace.
Speaker 1: Iran threatening harsh retaliation for the killing of its Top general by American forces.
Speaker 2: 3 days after a US drone strike, Iran announced that it will continue uranium enrichment with no in an about face to the Iran nuclear agreement.
Speaker 0: Iranian state TV now showing some of the more than 20 missiles launched from Iran into Iraq.
Speaker 1: They're scrambling around trying to figure out what the hell to do. This could very quickly become a wider regional We stand at the most dangerous moment in our lifetimes, and there's been plenty of dangerous moments.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Real Dangerous Lunatic: "Joe Biden Has Brought the World to the Brink of Nuclear Holocaust" @TuckerCarlson: "For the past seven years, the neo-con media establishment has been telling you that Donald Trump is a dangerous lunatic. In two years in office, Joe Biden has brought the world to the brink of nuclear holocaust. Who's the dangerous lunatic?" Video via @RealMacReport
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the media for portraying Donald Trump as dangerous while suggesting that Joe Biden's actions have brought the world close to a nuclear holocaust. They question who the real dangerous lunatic is and mention Biden's stance on global warming. The speaker then mentions that Joe Biden plans to run for president again in 2024 and asks Donald Trump for his thoughts on this and whether any legal conviction could deter him from running.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the past 7 years, the Neo Con media establishment's been telling you that Donald Trump is a dangerous lunatic. In 2 years in office, Joe Biden has brought the world to the brink of nuclear holocaust. Who's the dangerous lunatic? And they're lecturing you about global warming. Joe Biden says he's running again for president in 2024.
We asked Donald Trump his assessment of whether that's gonna happen and whether anything could get him out of the race, including a legal conviction. That's next.
reSee.it AI Summary
Democrats and media warned of Trump starting World War III. But let's examine reality: Trump achieved peace in the Middle East, no new wars, Abraham Accords, eliminated Soleimani, and wiped out ISIS. Biden's actions include disastrous Afghanistan pullout, arming the Taliban, billion-dollar prisoner exchange with Iran, Hamas attacks on Israel, and strikes on US bases in Syria. Which approach do you prefer?
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Democrats and the media told us Trump would be the one to start World War III Let’s take a look at reality: TRUMP: -Peace in the Middle East -No new wars -Abraham Accords -Took out Soleimani -Completely wiped out ISIS BIDEN: -Disastrous Afghanistan pull out -Left behind weapons for the Taliban -Billion dollar prisoner exchange w/ Iran -Hamas attacks on Israel -Attacks on US bases in Syria Which did you prefer?
@mazemoore - MAZE
2020. Biden on Trump - "As the walls close in on this man, I'm worried that he is going to get us into a war with Iran. Unfortunately I may have been right." https://t.co/V3OJEUlndW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The world has changed due to Trump's actions. Many Americans, including independents and some Republicans, are aware of his misrepresentations and the potential for war. I expressed concern that as pressure mounts, he may lead us into a conflict with Iran. Sadly, it seems my worries may have been justified. This election holds significant consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The world has changed because what Trump has done. And the American people, including independents and some Republicans, know how bad he is, know how much he's misrepresented, know how he's getting close to getting us in a war. I said, as the walls close in in this man, I'm worried he's gonna get us to war in Iran. Unfortunately, I may have been right. The fact of the matter is there's a lot at stake in this election
@FinanceLancelot - Financelot
"I'm worried that Trump is going to get us into a war with Iran" - Biden 2020 https://t.co/UipLCAvh9u
Video Transcript AI Summary
The world has changed due to Trump's actions. Many Americans, including independents and some Republicans, recognize his misrepresentation and fear he may lead us into war with Iran. The upcoming election holds significant importance.
Translation: The world has changed because of what Trump has done. Many Americans, including independents and some Republicans, are aware of his misrepresentation and fear he may lead us into war with Iran. The upcoming election is crucial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The world has changed because what Trump has done. And the American people, including independents and some Republicans, know how bad he is, know how much he's misrepresented, know how he's getting close to getting us in a war. I said, does the walls close in in this man? I'm worried he's gonna get us to war in Iran. Unfortunately, I may have been right.
The fact of the matter is there's a lot at stake in this election.
@TheWakeninq - 1776
FLASHBACK Dems: Maniac Trump is going to allow war to break out https://t.co/KRPA9uDR19
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are committed to fighting for as long as it takes, supporting the president. However, there are concerns about the potential for World War 3 due to President Trump's decisions. We must not underestimate the dangers of a deranged president with control over nuclear weapons. It is crucial to find a way to avoid nuclear war and put an end to forever wars responsibly. Congress needs to restrain the president and not give him green lights for war. The military-industrial complex prioritizes short-term profit over America's security needs, and it's time to end these forever wars. Unlimited war reflects a lack of moral, particularly within the Republican party. Elections have consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's worth fighting for for as long as it takes. And that's how long we're gonna be with you, mister president, for as long as it takes. We'll do it. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Well, we're on the brink of World War 3 because Donald Trump took the worst possible option given to him in a slideshow.
Speaker 2: In this country, we have begun to over Estimate the dangers of impeachment and underestimate the dangers of a deranged president retaining control over a nuclear hyper power.
Speaker 3: We cannot wait around While Donald Trump is in control of the nuclear weapon
Speaker 1: Your objection to potentially going into World War 3 cannot be procedural. Biggest danger of the Trump presidency is that we are always just a Trump whim away From nuclear war
Speaker 2: They say it's World War 3, but I'm looking out my window. It's very quiet in those smoking craters out there.
Speaker 1: Has to be told that it's his job to avoid World War 3.
Speaker 4: 1 democratic congressman, sent me a note this evening and say this President wants this war.
Speaker 1: A future administration needs to find a way to put an end to the forever wars.
Speaker 4: They're in a new normal, and
Speaker 1: the new normal is forever war. But there's a, you know, big difference between ending the forever wars, which he wants to do responsibly, and what seems to be president Trump's Rather itchy Twitter thing.
Speaker 5: The objective needs to be, to end the forever wars.
Speaker 3: If congress does not wanna go to war, Now is the time to start putting restraints on this president. And, again, they've been giving him green lights all the way.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's because we're gonna take on the military industrial complex and end and end endless wars.
Speaker 6: Every American needs to wake up to the Inanigans of the military industrial complex, and how much 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars are spent only because of short term profit And for, for military defense contractors as opposed to America's legitimate security needs.
Speaker 0: It's long past time we end the forever wars.
Speaker 7: All of this though risks more of a proxy war than I think we're gonna have a stomach for. And ending our forever wars so that we can better serve our constituents at home.
Speaker 8: When It comes to unlimited war. We seem to be able to be to to invent that numb that money very easily. And to me, it belies a lack of moral that people have right now, especially Republican party.
Speaker 0: And that's why there are elections. They have consequences.
@DogRightGirl - Spitfire
“Look, my Marine has a code to blow up the world" Biden Just imagine if Trump did this. Just imagine. https://t.co/YeEXkUlazG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nick receives a message about a marine carrying out a code to blow up the world. He questions if it involves nuclear weapons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Nick. Hey, Nick. This is Nick with you, buddy. What's this? Now look.
My my marine carries out. It has a code to blow off the world. That doesn't this is not nuclear weapons, is it? Alright. Okay.
In. He's gonna get the
@mazemoore - MAZE
In 2020 Trump said what Biden would do if he became President. Unfortunately he was right. https://t.co/RDfllm15yY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Before taking office, there were bold predictions about the negative outcomes if Biden won. These included open borders, loss of the middle class, decreased safety, and high gas prices. Additionally, concerns were raised about an influx of criminal aliens, drugs, and crime in communities, as well as excessive spending on foreign nations and wars. However, the current situation does not align with these predictions. Criticism is directed towards Biden's inability to confront the extreme elements within his party and even his difficulty in leaving the stage. In summary, the speaker believes that the job is not being done well.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before I took office, there was a lot of folks out there a lot of folks out there making some pretty bold predictions about how things would turn out.
Speaker 1: But if Biden wins, your borders are gone, the middle class is gone, your safety is gone. Gas prices going 5, 6, $7 for a gallon. Invade your communities with criminal aliens, drugs, and crime. To spend 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars rebuilding foreign nations, fighting foreign wars and defending foreign borders.
Speaker 0: So for all those predictions of doom and gloom, here's where we stand.
Speaker 1: Do you ought to use the word recession or depression? And you know Biden, he can't stand up to the lunatics running his party. He can't even find his way off the stage without
Speaker 0: Look. The bottom line is this.
Speaker 1: I say you're not doing a very good job.
@ricwe123 - Richard
"We led a coup in Ukraine, installed a government, looted, and played both sides" -Joe Biden in 2016 https://t.co/NT8LZgjfGF
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have been in regular contact with Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, and the current speaker for the past 4 years, discussing the situation in Ukraine. There is pressure in Europe to ease sanctions on Ukraine, but I insisted on withholding aid until certain conditions were met. We are working on a detailed plan outlining security guarantees from Russia and political steps for Ukraine. These steps are challenging, such as granting special status to certain regions. I believe Ukraine is willing to make these difficult changes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. I I am not the pen pal, but the phone pal of Poroshenko and Arseniy Yatsenyuk and now the speaker. I literally, without exaggeration, the last, 4 years, I'm on the phone 2 to 3 hours a week with those folks. There's an overwhelming instinct in Europe to say, hey, Before you guys became president, this was owned by Russia anyway. They had a puppet there.
What difference does it make? What the hell is the difference? Why are you making us engage in these sanctions? You remember last year, I was authorized to say we do the 2nd tranche of a $1,000,000,000 and he didn't fire his, his, chief prosecutor. And because I have the confidence of the president, I was there.
I said, I'm not signing it. Until you fire him, we're not signing, man. Get it straight. We're not doing it. Till you form a new government and you actually bring in someone who will move on this, we're not playing.
Not because we're trying to play hardball, because we know if they give an excuse to the EU, there are at least 5 countries right now that wanna say, woah, we want out. At least 5 right now. And so, what we put together, we're putting together now is a basic detailed roadmap of who goes first and who goes second. And there's 2 pieces of this, folks. 1 is the security guarantees that are to flow from Russia.
Into the political steps that Ukraine has to take. And some of the steps are very difficult to take. They've already done the energy piece. They've done some other things. But my point is that when you say the dumb boss is gonna have a special status and you're gonna amend your constitution, It's like saying, okay, you know, Texas and Wyoming Texas is gonna have a special status that we don't want because we want, Mexico to have more influence in Texas.
And we're gonna pass that through the United States Congress. So it's a really tough stuff they've gotta do. They're willing I'm convinced they will do it.
@mazemoore - MAZE
2020. Biden on Trump - "As the walls close in on this man, I'm worried that he's going to get us to war in Iran." https://t.co/HpSpQ9yBSg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The world has changed because of Trump's actions. Many Americans, including independents and some Republicans, see how bad he is, how he misrepresents, and fear he may lead us into war with Iran. The stakes are high in this election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The world has changed because what Trump has done. And the American people, including independents and some Republicans, know how bad he is, know how much he's misrepresented, know how he's getting close to getting us in a war. I said, there's a wall's closed in on this man. I'm worried he's gonna get us to war in Iran. Unfortunately, I may have been right.
The fact of the matter is there's a lot at stake in this election.
@WINGMAN4567 - James
@robbystarbuck Yeah we also remember this when he was telling us Trump would get us into a war with Iran… https://t.co/tAyrkLoLmU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The world has changed due to Trump's actions, and many Americans, including independents and some Republicans, see how harmful he is. There are concerns about him leading the country into a war, particularly with Iran. The upcoming election holds significant importance.
Translation:
The world has changed because of what Trump has done. Many Americans, including independents and some Republicans, recognize his negative impact and fear he may lead the country into a war. The upcoming election is crucial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The world has changed because what Trump has done. And the American people, including independents and some Republicans, know how bad he is, know how much he's misrepresented, know how he's getting close to getting us in a war. I said, there's a wall closing in this man. I'm worried he's gonna get us to war in Iran. Unfortunately, I may have been right.
The fact of the matter is there's a lot at stake in this election.
@AdamKinzinger - Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱
Emergency video: Donald Trump did NOT deter Iran. In fact he simply surrendered to our enemies. Quit rewriting history. https://t.co/4YpXAvcaEm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump's foreign policy failures are highlighted, including inaction after Iran's attacks and drone downing. Criticized for surrendering American interests to Russia and Iran, he is deemed the worst foreign policy president of the speaker's generation. Supporters' claims of avoiding wars are dismissed as surrendering. Trump is portrayed as weak and fearful, not a master of foreign policy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Just wanna do a quick video. I'm I'm seeing everybody. Well, people like probably Marjorie Taylor Greene. I haven't seen her, but she probably is.
But JD Vance and other people on the Twittersphere and on the media saying things like, you know, Donald Trump, was doing such a great job of deterring Iran. Here's some quick reminders. Okay? We killed Soleimani. Good job.
I actually give Trump credit for that. That was a good hit. Iran responded by launching a whole bunch of missiles at a US base, in Iraq. A 100 soldiers were injured with traumatic brain injuries. Remember Donald Trump said, oh, they're just some headaches?
Yeah. Not to those people. It's serious. How did we respond to that missile barrage against our base? We did nothing.
Do you remember when they shot down a 100,000,000 something dollar drone, which by the way is not like a little drone. It's about the size of an airliner. And we responded by oh, that's right. Trump did nothing. Remember when they attacked the Saudi oil field with a massive barrage?
Trump responded by that's right. He didn't do anything. Do you remember when he said we were gonna leave the Kurds behind? Remember when he kept talking about leaving Syria and leaving Syria to Iran? Yeah.
Let's be clear about Donald Trump. I have my disagreements with this administration, but let's quit pretending Donald Trump was anything but the worst foreign policy president of my generation because he was. He gave Russia everything they needed. He gave Iran everything they needed, and basically was just absolutely surrendering American interest around the world. Look.
People that support him are always like, look. He's not getting that. He didn't get us in any other war. Yeah. It's really easy not to get in a war if you just surrender everything.
So let's quit rewriting history on Donald Trump because he was not some master of foreign policy. He was a weak, small, tiny man who was scared to death. That's all.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Biden said to “put Trump in a bullseye." A few days later this happened. https://t.co/Sd2cQzII0E
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Biden calls Trump a 'danger to the community, danger to the nation.' This is one week after the assassination attempt. Democrats are back to fomenting violence. https://t.co/kqG1s7ZvkX
Video Transcript AI Summary
I will campaign with Kamala and work on passing legislation as a sitting president. We must protect democracy because Trump is still a danger to the community and the nation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And by the way, I'm not going anywhere. I'm gonna be out there and campaign with her. With Kamala, I'm gonna be working like hell, both as a sitting president, getting legislation passed, as well as in campaigning. You know, what we still need to say this democracy And Trump Trump is still a danger to the community. He's a danger to the nation.
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
BREAKING: President Biden blasts Trump, calls him "a loser, a sucker, a failing president, a failing man," says his son died because of one year in Iraq. WATCH https://t.co/tayjsEK8hu
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, the speaker ran for president to rebuild the middle class, and claims to have done just that. They believe America is experiencing a great comeback, contrasting this with their predecessor's view that America is a failing nation. The speaker calls their predecessor a failing president and a failing man, asserting that America is winning and remains the indispensable nation. They allege that their predecessor refused to visit an American Cemetery in France, with his chief of staff reporting that he called the servicemen buried there "suckers and losers." Referencing their own son's death in Iraq, the speaker expresses gratitude for not being present at the cemetery, suggesting they would have reacted strongly, and labels their predecessor a "sucker" and a "loser."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me close to this. In 2020, I said one of the reasons I was running was to rebuild the backbone of America, the middle class. Nearly 4 years later, we've done just that. In thousands of cities and towns across the country, we're seeing the great American comeback story. My predecessor believes America is a failing nation.
He's a failing president and a failing man. He's wrong. America's failing. We're winning. Yeah.
We're the we are the indispensable nation in the world. We're the nation of dreamers and doers who led to the greatest advantage in human history over the last 200 years. That's who we are. But my president doesn't get it. He refused to visit American Cemetery in France that I was just near because according to his own chief of staff, a 4 star marine general, Trump said those servicemen buried there are suckers and losers.
My son died because of a year in Iraq. I'm just happy, and I mean this in front of my heart. I'm glad I wasn't there. I think I would've done something. No.
I think you would've too. They're heroes. He's a sucker. He's a loser way back.
@ricwe123 - Richard
"We led a coup in Ukraine, installed a government, looted, and played both sides" (Joe Biden in 2016) https://t.co/zEyiXQddLG
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have been in regular contact with Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk over the past four years, spending 2 to 3 hours weekly on the phone. There's a strong sentiment in Europe questioning the need for sanctions against Ukraine, given its past under Russian influence. Last year, I withheld a $1 billion aid tranche until Ukraine fired its chief prosecutor, emphasizing the importance of forming a new government committed to reform. We are developing a roadmap outlining security guarantees from Russia and necessary political steps for Ukraine, which include difficult constitutional amendments. These changes are essential to prevent any EU member states from seeking to withdraw from sanctions. Ukraine has already made progress in areas like energy, and I believe they are willing to undertake the necessary reforms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. I I am not the pen pal, but the phone pal of Poroshenko and Arseny Yacineuk and now the speaker. I literally, without exaggeration, the last, 4 years, I'm on the phone 2 to 3 hours a week with with with those folks. There's an overwhelming instinct in Europe to say, hey. Before you guys became president, this was owned by Russia anyway.
They had a puppet there. What difference does it make? What the hell is the difference? Why are you making us engage in these sanctions? You remember last year, I was authorized to say we do the 2nd tranche of a $1,000,000,000 and he didn't fire his, his, chief prosecutor.
And because I have the conference of the president, I was there. I said, I'm not signing it. Until you fire him, we're not signing, man. Get it straight. We're not doing it.
Till you form a new government and you actually bring in someone who will move on us, we're not playing. Not because we're trying to play hardball, because we know if they give an excuse to the EU, there are at least 5 countries right now that wanna say, woah, we want out. At least 5 right now. And so, what we put together, we're putting together now is a basic detailed roadmap of who goes 1st and who goes 2nd. There's 2 pieces of this folks.
1 is the security guarantees that are to flow from Russia. Into the political steps that Ukraine has to take. And some of the steps are very difficult to take. They've already done the energy piece. They've done some other things.
But my point is that when you say the dumb boss is gonna have a special status and you're gonna amend your constitution, it's like saying, okay, you know, Texas and Wyoming Texas is gonna have a special status that we don't want because we want, Mexico to have more influence in Texas. And we're gonna pass that through the United States Congress. So there's some really tough stuff they've gotta do. They're willing I'm convinced they will do it.
@WarClandestine - Clandestine
Wow… Trump just accused Biden of starting the war in Ukraine! 👀 For decades, Russia have been clear that NATO membership for Ukraine was a hard red line, yet Biden pushed for membership anyways, provoking Russia. The Deep State are responsible for this war, not Russia. https://t.co/LEoTDON7z1
Video Transcript AI Summary
I predicted yesterday's events accurately. I don't believe Russia would ever allow Ukraine to join NATO, regardless of who is in power. I believe the war began because Biden stated Ukraine could join NATO, which he shouldn't have done. I knew then that war was inevitable, and I was right. This war is Biden's fault, not Putin's. Biden is incompetent, and saying Ukraine could join NATO was foolish. His comment about a "minor incursion" being acceptable was also a mistake.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday were pretty accurate. I don't see any way that a country in Russia's position could allow them just in their position could allow them to join NATO. I don't see that happening. And long before president Putin, Russia was very strong in the fact that I believe that's the reason the war started because Biden went out and said that they could join NATO and he shouldn't have said that. As soon as he said that, I said, you know what?
You're gonna have a war now. And I was right about that. That this is a war that would have never happened if our president Can you look at President Biden's fault, not President Putin? I mean, he's I think Biden is incompetent. And I think when he said that, they could join NATO, I thought that was was a very stupid thing to say.
I thought when he said, well, it depends if it's a minor incursion. In other words, it's okay if Russia does a minor incursion. I thought that was a very foolish thing to say.
@TheRedactedInc - Redacted
“War with Iran will kill thousands of Americans & the U.S. will lose” 🚨 @TuckerCarlson sounds the alarm! https://t.co/xgWKyvNlca
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Neocons are allegedly pushing Trump into a war with Iran, echoing Israel's long-term aim to weaken Iran. Trump surprised many by announcing high-level US-Iran talks, potentially blindsiding Netanyahu. Trump stated Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, despite his intelligence community claiming Iran isn't developing one.
- Tucker Carlson warned that a conflict with Iran would be catastrophic for the US, with thousands of American casualties. There are claims that the US cannot win a war against Iran, and Russia would step in.
- Trump launched a tariff attack on China, awaiting their call for a deal. China is allegedly ready to fight to the end in a trade war, mocking the US's manufacturing capabilities. Treasury Secretary stated China is making a mistake by escalating, holding a weak hand in the trade deficit.
- The Biden administration allegedly buried a military document suggesting US service members had COVID before China acknowledged the virus, potentially to protect China.
- Pam Bondi's DOJ revealed Trump assassin Ryan Routh tried to buy military weapons from Ukraine to kill Trump. Routh allegedly used Signal to communicate with a Ukrainian associate for weapons, including a rocket launcher. Tucker Carlson claimed the Ukrainian military is selling up to half of the arms the US sends them, possibly ending up with drug cartels.
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was criticized for flying first class to a Bernie Sanders rally against oligarchy and income inequality, seen as hypocritical. Bernie Sanders is also seen as hypocritical for pushing socialism while profiting from capitalism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the biggest story in Washington right now, is that neocons are pushing president Trump into a war with Iran. Former U UK Ambassador Richard Dalton said this morning that the threat of war with Iran has never been higher. Watch.
Speaker 1: How seriously do you take this from president Trump?
Speaker 2: I do take it seriously. The risk of a war between Israel and The United States on the one hand and Iran on the other has never been higher. And that's because it's been Israel's aim for many years to strike Iran, and they've always wanted to attract United States, to their side to do it because of limitations in Israel's capabilities, particularly in sustaining a long haul. This is chiefly about weakening Iran as a state. Iran
Speaker 0: Yeah. So doing Israel's bidding. That's why Benjamin Netanyahu was in Washington yesterday. Neo cons would love nothing more than carrying out Netanyahu's fantasy of destroying Iran. Well, Trump may have just thrown a monkey wrench into those neocon plans.
Just yesterday, Iran was, of course, brushing off the idea of sitting down with The United States, saying direct talks were basically pointless because according to them, Washington can't go five minutes without some sort of a threat of military action, which is actually true. We like to do that. But then fast forward to today, and then suddenly the script is totally flipped. And just wait until you see Netanyahu's reaction that's priceless. On Monday, Donald Trump dropped a surprise announcement that high level US officials will be meeting directly with Iranian leaders this coming weekend.
And they've actually Iran confirmed this and actually released the the, the date and time of where this was going to happen. Not through a proxy, not through Israel, but directly talking to Iran. He made it clear that the nuclear issue is still front and center, saying flat out that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, even though Trump's own intelligence community says that there is no Iran's not developing a nuclear weapon, and Tulsi Gabbard in front of congress confirmed that on the record.
Speaker 1: And Barack Obama spent eight years trying to prove it and never did
Speaker 0: Never could.
Speaker 1: But sanctioned sanctioned them to within an inch of their life.
Speaker 0: So watch this. He admitted right in front of Netanyahu and watch he said, I'm gonna we're gonna be holding talks with Iran, this weekend, direct talks. And I don't know. This looked like a total blindside to Benjamin Netanyahu. Watch Benjamin Netanyahu's face when Trump let the cat out of the bag.
Watch.
Speaker 3: We're having direct talks with Iran, and, they've started. It'll go on Saturday. We have a very big meeting, and we'll see what can happen. And I think everybody agrees that doing a deal would be preferable to doing the obvious. And the obvious is not something that I wanna be involved with or, frankly, that Israel wants to be involved with if they can avoid it.
So we're gonna see if we can avoid it. But it's getting to be very dangerous territory, and, hopefully, those talks will be successful. And I think it would be in Iran's best interest if they are successful. We hope we hope that's going to happen.
Speaker 0: He looks like you remember see that Will Ferrell character where he's like a cat with a with a ball? He's like like it's just like Benjamin Netanyahu's face the whole time, Locked
Speaker 1: Ball.
Speaker 0: Like, it's really weird.
Speaker 1: You know, in him saying, look, Israel doesn't want a war with Iran, and Netanyahu's like, I do.
Speaker 4: I've always said this is
Speaker 1: something I've wanted my whole life. I will want for no more as soon as I get this. But it occurred to me that Trump is actually speaking on behalf of the people of Israel. Sometimes we think that Benjamin Netanyahu represents them. He doesn't.
The people of Israel do not want a war with Iran. For the most part, they want peace. Who wouldn't? What crazy person would not? Right?
And so in that moment, I was like, Trump is a better president to Israel. That he continues to say, I'm the best president Israel has ever had. That might be true if he is able to supersede the war that their president that their prime minister wants so badly.
Speaker 0: So watch Netanyahu's face close-up when he made this announcement.
Speaker 3: We're having direct talks with Iran, and they've started. It'll go on Saturday. We have a very big meeting, and we'll see what can happen. And I think everybody agrees that doing a deal would be preferable, to doing the obvious.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And as, John John Spinn in our chat says, yeah, that's true that, you know, most Israelis do not support Benjamin Netanyahu. October seventh, he says, was because one half of Israel was out protesting Bibi. Right? Yeah.
That was the story again. No one was covering in the in the in the West, which was the thousands of people across Israel out in protest of Benjamin Netanyahu. And here's the part that should actually be making headlines everywhere. Somehow, it isn't. If this breaks down, the threat of another endless war in The Middle East becomes very real.
An Iran conflict, especially one backed by the usual neocon voices in Washington would be catastrophic for The United States, not just for that region as well, but for American forces, and America itself. Here's what Tucker had to say about this. Whatever you think of tariffs, it's clear that now is the worst possible time for The United States to participate in a military strike on Iran. We can't afford it. Thousands of Americans would die.
We'd lose the war that follows. Nothing would be more destructive to our country, and yet we're closer than ever thanks to unrelenting pressure from neocons. This is suicidal. Anyone advocating for conflict with Iran is not an ally of The United States, but an enemy. And by the way, talk to members of the military, the US military.
I was on a flight this weekend and had the pleasure of speaking with a, United States member of the army and said, oh my god, these guys agitating for war with Iran. They're crazy. They're crazy. It would be devastating. They know it.
We know it. Our military experts we've had on this show, like Colonel MacGregor and others have pointed out how devastating it would be. Thousands of miles away, you're going to go right into a hornet's nest. You've got 50,000 American troops that are sitting ducks right now in this region. It would be devastating, but yet you have all these b two bombers which are now have been put on high alert.
They're more now in this region than ever before in Diego Garcia as of this morning. So they are agitating quickly to get us into this war.
Speaker 1: Have you read the comments on Tucker's post?
Speaker 0: On this post? I've read a lot of them. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Some of them are so crazy. So crazy. People saying, well, we couldn't win a war, so we shouldn't get in it. Yeah. Yes.
That.
Speaker 0: People yeah. People are like, You don't think we're strong enough to to win a war against Iran? No, we're not. We are absolutely not. You wanna know what happens is we enter a war with Iran?
Russia steps in. We've already proven that we cannot win a war against Russia. We've tried for, you know, more than two years with US arms using and by the way, not even using our own soldiers. Using a proxy and we can't do crap. We've lost massive amounts of territory.
We would absolutely lose in a war with Iran.
Speaker 1: I don't understand that logic. That even though we know we'd lose, we should do it anyway. Like, I should I go do MMA fighting knowing that I'll lose now just to see what it makes of me?
Speaker 0: Yeah, that'd be fun.
Speaker 1: Take those people down. Like, where does that I don't understand. Please try to
Speaker 0: I'd pay to see that, by the way. Me too.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty scrappy. I might get by for a little bit.
Speaker 0: Tiny Hawaiian, Latina mix, world face. Global face. That would be your ring name. Welcome to the ring, global face. You never know.
She might throw a pineapple at you or come at you with something else.
Speaker 1: You never know. Okay. I hit below the belt if it comes to Redacted is brought to you by Ground News. This is a service we use all the time because Ground News is a great way to tell you what is the political bent of any given story in any given topic. So, if you are looking at a story like chemtrails, for instance, and you think, well, what is the deal with chemtrails?
I mean, is this a conspiracy theory or not? It will give a list of how that's covered and then rate each coverage, whether or not it's right wing, left wing, partisan, nonpartisan, and it will give it a grade. You know, I was telling my kids the other day that a lot of times it's hard because if you're reading the news, you don't know how to sniff out what's missing, where they're lying by omission. That's my career. It's taken me a whole lifetime to learn that.
And so we need help being able to tell bias, where there is omission. That's why there are great tools like Ground News. So for instance, Mexico extradites 29 cartel suspects. These kinds of stories, is it highly factual? Does it lean one way or another?
So check out ground. Newsredacted. And if you go there or scan the QR code on your screen, you'll get 40% off the same plan that we use every day. Again, that's ground. Newsredacted.
Check them out and you'll get 40% off. And again, it's a great way for you to sniff out the propaganda. Well, president Trump just launched a devastating tariff attack on China this morning, now sitting a 4% tariffs. All hell may break loose. So buy all those all that cheap Chinese stuff while you can because that's not gonna last.
It says Trump awaits call from China, but aides say a deal not likely before a 4% tariffs hit. Now meanwhile, China is talking out of both sides of their mouth. On the one hand, perhaps ready to talk with president Trump. And on the other hand, they say they are ready to fight to the end if it comes to it in a trade war with America, increasing their own tariffs against The US. Now yesterday, a series of Chinese memes started making the rounds, sort of poking fun at the fact that most of the things and let's acknowledge this.
Let's be honest. Most of the things we're using, our computers, our clothes, they are made by people who work very hard and are a lot more adept at it. And we are the beneficiaries of that. And so they're kind of poking fun at the fact that We're not kind of. We may not be able to do it this way.
Watch this. Yeah. It's rude.
Speaker 0: They're basically saying you guys are all fat and lazy, and, The United States cannot compete with our manufacturing because we're the best. You watch this. This is not like a veiled comment.
Speaker 1: That hurts my feelings.
Speaker 0: And you hear the little Chinese music in the background? Does it hurt
Speaker 1: your feelings?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, basically calling lazy and fat. Right? Like, we don't have the capacity to do it. And because it's all been offshore, they literally have a lot of these factory workers that live like right on-site.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: So they work what is it like, I don't know how many hours a day, not eight. Well, look. Then they live in the place where they're working.
Speaker 1: One of the reasons the Silicon Valley became the Silicon Valley is because the access to so many Asian immigrants. And in the book, What the Dormouse Said, the chipmakers admit that they need small Asian ladies with small hands. Yeah. We still have those. We we got some, but the the question remains, those are immigrants.
Could we actually do it ourselves? I guess we're about to find out and put our money where our mouth is.
Speaker 0: I mean, we're literally going I mean, this is a war. You know, it's maybe not a kinetic war yet, hopefully, but this is a war. Treasury secretary Bissen said this morning that China is playing the wrong hand here. There's only they're only holding two a pair of twos right now, he said. And he said it was a it's a major mistake for them to escalate.
Watch.
Speaker 5: Many of as I said, many of our trading partners, they have queued up, and they have kept their cool. They have not escalated, and they will get priority in the queue. I think it was a big mistake, this Chinese escalation, because, you know, they're playing with a pair of twos. Traditionally, if you if if you if you look if you look at the history, negotiations, the we we are the deficit country. So what do we lose by the Chinese raising tariffs on us?
They we we export one fifth to them of what they export to us. So that that is a losing hand for them.
Speaker 0: So, you know, as a professor of economics, him not me, he points out that the debtor always has a stronger hand in a, you know, trade surplus. Trade surplus, trade deficit. And because they export so much to us, they are they are holding a pair of twos in their hand right now
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Which is really interesting. But there appears to be though some softening on China's side, and it appears that they might actually be willing to talk. And president Trump just posted this on Truth Social. It's long, but I'll cut to the end here because he's talking about other countries. But he talks about China wants to make a deal badly, but they don't know how to get it started.
We're waiting for their phone call. It will happen. God bless The United States. But in the meantime, these 4% tariffs are gonna hit. So while they try to figure out how to get on the phone, call President Trump.
Someone
Speaker 4: in our
Speaker 1: chat says, yeah, we don't have small Asians, but we have kids. No, no. That's not what we're advocating.
Speaker 0: Let's get the child labor out. Oh my God. Upton Sinclair, are
Speaker 1: you rolling over his Yeah. Alright. Also, got some news this morning over the Biden administration's handling of China during COVID. It turns out they went out of their way to protect China during the pandemic. This should not be a surprise to you, but it is a surprise to see it in writing.
Other people admitting it. I guess when you've received millions of dollars, you're gonna defend the person who was sending that money to you, the Biden family is. According to news in the Free Beacon, the Biden administration may have quietly sat on a military document from 02/2022 suggesting something pretty major that seven US service members might have come in down with COVID just months before China even acknowledged that the virus existed. This traces back to 2019 in Wuhan, at the military games. What's wild is that this report was supposed to be made public by law, but it never was.
The Biden administration buried it. So why? Why do you think they did that? What do
Speaker 0: you think? Could it be all the money? Could it be all the money that the Biden's received from Yes.
Speaker 1: Very curious.
Speaker 0: It's an idea. Yeah. And, and, you know, so that it was a lie. It never saw the light of day. It throws a wrench in the official story that we've been told, of course, especially the claims that no US Troops were affected during those games.
That was a lie. A bald faced lie by the Biden administration. Shocking. I know. And if it holds up, if this report holds up and it appears to be legitimate, it lends more weight to the theory that, yes, the virus did come from the lab and something that the CIA has now confirmed and admitted to be true, although quietly.
So why bury this whole thing?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Alright. Well, remember this guy? You guys remember this guy? What a handsome what a handsome devil this guy is.
Ryan Routh? Well, his skinny Gary Busey.
Speaker 1: He does.
Speaker 0: A more sane Gary Busey. Well, perhaps. Maybe Pam Bondi's DOJ has just revealed that Trump assassin Ryan Routh tried to buy military weapons from Ukraine to kill president Trump, including a rocket launcher. So just if a gun didn't work, a rocket launcher would have. According to the indictment, take a look at this.
Routh asked Ukrainian military for a Stinger RPG to take out Trump. Because Trump would be quote bad for Ukraine. He communicated all of this, by the way, the signal application, which we now know, you know, you use signal, it's like lots of criminals using signal, right? He attempted to acquire anti aircraft weapons as direct evidence of his assassination attempt. All done on signal, by the way.
That month, Ralph sought to purchase the devices online from an associate believed to be a Ukrainian with access to military weapons. The two discussed this all over signal in that in July of twenty twenty four, the attempt on president Trump's life in Butler, Pennsylvania was quote, he wished that he was the one who had carried it out and that he that he wished that he had been assassinated. It also talks about in this, in this rule, in this indictment, that it includes, it proves planning, motive, and the intent to kill president Trump. And they want this information made admissible during a trial because it shows that he app you know, actively was trying to assassinate him. And they found this on his phone, of course.
They the two went back and forth, began discussing Routh's purchase of a weapon in August. Routh told his associate to quote, send me an RPG or Stinger, and I'll see what we can do. Trump is not good for Ukraine.
Speaker 1: How do you just ship
Speaker 0: Then he asked them to ship it to him.
Speaker 1: Do just do that?
Speaker 0: I mean, I guess what would be possibly like a CIA asset. Right? Because my question is, no one was in Ukraine. No American and we've talked about this with CIA whistleblowers and military experts on our show. There's no way that he was in Ukraine when he was and that our CIA and deep state didn't know that he was there.
They absolutely knew that he was there. So then here's a question. Did Ukraine know about this plot in advance? We know the CIA totally controls Ukraine, as even the New York Times has reported.
Speaker 4: Does the
Speaker 0: CIA know?
Speaker 1: Crazy dude. Ukraine is really important, and The United States needs to continue to support their efforts to go to war with Russia. But not so important that they can't spare a weapon or two for him to kill Donald Trump. That's what that's how he would think.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, he basically says in this he says this in his signal messages that they won't know where they are. He said that the he say he admitted that Ukraine receives our weapons and then sells them off to the highest bidder. He basically acknowledged in these documents that they get lost all all of the time on the battlefield, and no one would miss them, he said. Tucker recently talked about Ukraine's selling of these weapons.
Watch.
Speaker 4: Second fact, fact, not guess. Fact is Ukrainian military is selling a huge percentage, up to half of the arms that we send them. Half. And I'm not guessing about this. I know that for a fact.
A fact. Okay? Not speculation. And they're selling it, and a lot of us winding up with the drug cartels on our border. So this is the this this is a crime, what's happening.
Our intel agencies are fully aware of this. You tell me they're not profiting from this. Of course, you think CIA is not profiting from this? Yes. They are.
I can't prove that, but I believe that. But they don't know this. I know this, but they don't know They know this. And no one is saying it. Like, no American seems aware of this.
We're sending these arms to Ukraine, Billions Of Billions, Hundreds Of Billions Of Dollars, and it's being stolen and sold to our actual enemies. Like, what the I'm trying not to swear. What is this?
Speaker 6: Yeah. Well, the reason why is because you have Zelenskyy. It was about three weeks ago, I think, was specifically asked this question. So he went at some length in one of his interviews to say, oh, no. Absolutely not.
There's no truth to that at all. We've implemented all this thing. I know that, but the the media just reported what you said.
Speaker 4: New York Times could get on the web and order Ukrainian weapons. That's a fact. I'm not guessing. It's a fact.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And they could be used to assassinate president Trump. Very, very easy. So many of you asking in the chat room, when is this guy's trial gonna take place? Is that scheduled?
It's scheduled for 09/08/2025. So he's got a long spring and summer to be sitting behind bars. If he's sentenced, he could be sentenced to life in prison if convicted. I'm gonna tell you about our friends at Bunker because you might have heard all these stories lately about like Signal and all these like bad guys using Signal and and all of these leaks and everything. Just wanna tell you about our friends at Bunker because Bunker has been a great sponsor for Redacted.
They're having a tremendous growth. Thanks to viewers like you who've downloaded the app, gone to the App Store, and picked it up. High net worth families, law enforcement agents, professional athletes, tactical response trainers are trusting Bunker to protect their lives from surveillance, from cybercriminals, and other threats. If you join them, here's what you get. Bunker is an uncompromised private messenger together with a password manager, a secure vault, and notes that work seamlessly together.
All of it tied into one. In over a 30 countries, Bunker customers enjoy peace of mind. They travel with greater ease. They have more energy to focus on what matters most because you can create notes for to do lists, your travel, your banking, all of that stuff is in Bunker and protected. Download Bunker today from the App Store, the Play Store, or visit their website.
Just go to bunker.life. Use the offer code redacted to get 25% off. Live life to the fullest, protect what matters most, download Bunker today. So many of our viewers are using Bunker instead of like, you know, Zuckerberg owned WhatsApp messenger and stuff like that. So check them out today at bunker.life.
Speaker 1: Well, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez was trending this week because someone snapped this photo of her flying first class on her way to a Bernie Sanders rally, all about to fight for, wait for it, fighting the oligarchy and income inequality. Now, I sort of assume that representatives may or may not take first class from time to time. They may get a bump or what we see them as these elevated statures. And she though sets herself apart as someone who is very much against wealth while living a life proving that she has it. I think that the narrative here rights itself is that democrats are the elites.
That it's clear that they are, right? So I don't begrudge her a first class seat any more than I did Eric Adams in his indictment. I absolutely think that Eric Adams should not have been indicted for it. It just is a bad optic when she's going off to take this picture. So iconic is fight the oligarchy, tax the rich.
It's one of those moments where people start to question the message if it really matches the lifestyle. You know, she often talks about we shouldn't have gas stoves, but then she'll do a cooking video where she's using a gas stove, that kind of thing. You know, she's one of those climate activists who is willing to take a a private jet. And And so that's why this was trending. Let us know what you think.
I mean, I think maybe it's not the worst thing in the world, but it points out she has access to a lot of It's hypocrisy. As an elite that she speaks out against.
Speaker 0: It's hypocrisy. It's ironic. Right? So she's asking you to take power to the people, fight the oligarchy, fight those that are in power that have consolidated the wealth of the top, the the people that take first class flights.
Speaker 1: You don't see any democratic elites in amongst the people. And when they do go amongst the people, they look like fools. They don't know, you know, how to hold a shovel.
Speaker 0: Well, mean, when Bernie Sanders has made millions of dollars, he's made millions of dollars. He pushes for socialism and yet he's made millions of dollars off of capitalism. I mean, his selling of his book, right? That's the American dream. You work hard, you write a book and people buy it, and you're are rewarded in a capitalist society if people find value in your work.
If they don't, they don't buy the book. That's how it works. Socialism props up losers and they pick winners and losers. And so Bernie doesn't see the irony here. And I think that's why this is so ironic.
I've seen I've definitely seen like, you know, individuals on first class seats, but I've seen actually plenty of politicians sitting in coach when I've flown. Mhmm. You know, I've seen been on flights flight
Speaker 1: attendant responded to me on X and said a lot of them do not wanna be seen in first class. They won't do it no matter what.
Speaker 0: No. I've sat I've sat and I've and I've sat I've sat a few rows behind different politicians and coach. And so, you know, I I see that I see it regularly. So that you have to make the choice to sit in first class in this situation. You're on your way to a Bernie Sanders fight the oligarchy rally and you choose to sit in first class.
I just
Speaker 1: But she's always a contradiction. That's why I feel like but, yeah, she's she's a fraud. That's
Speaker 0: Well, have her explain economics. I watched a video the other day. Thomas Sowell just like was watching her try to explain the the the horror the horrors of capitalism, and he just was like shaking his head. He's like, what? She literally said nothing of value at all.
Not one word that came out of her mouth made any sense. She's platitudes that have no meaning in reality at all. And, you know, that's what she does. She gets up on stage and she's invited to these speeches and she just rolls off a whole bunch of like democratic talking points that mean nothing.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But she's got the Riz. That's why they like her.
Speaker 0: I guess.
Speaker 1: They're not listening to what she says clearly.
@DougAMacgregor - Douglas Macgregor
War with Iran is likely to walk The United States directly into WW III. Let's avoid this! https://t.co/K7Sv5NkwhA
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
I think now is a good time to remind everyone about that time President Trump shared a video of Jeffrey Sachs telling us how Bibi Netanyahu was responsible for the wars in Iraq and Syria and has been trying to bait the US to attack Iran. Just in case you didn't think he knows. https://t.co/POMS5f14M7
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the war in Syria began with Obama tasking the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government four years before Russia intervened. They allege the New York Times rarely reported on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad.
Regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the speaker states the US used phony pretenses and focus groups to sell the war to the American people. They claim Netanyahu wanted the war to topple governments supporting Hamas and Hezbollah, specifically Iraq, Syria, and Iran. The speaker accuses Netanyahu of pushing the US into endless wars and still trying to get the US to fight Iran. They conclude that the terms "democracy versus dictatorship" are not sensible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The war in Syria. And you may actually hear from grown up reporters who are lying through their teeth or ignorant beyond imagining that, oh, the war in Syria. Yes. Russia intervened in Syria. Well, do you know that the that Obama tasked the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government starting four years before Russia intervened?
What kind of nonsense is that? And how many times did the New York Times report on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad? Three times in ten years. This is not democracy. This is a game, and it's a game of narrative.
Why did The US invade Iraq in 02/2003? Well, first of all, it was completely phony pretenses. It wasn't, oh, we were so wrong. They didn't have weapons of mass destruction. They actually did focus groups in the February to find out what would sell that war to the American people.
Abe Sholstie, if you wanna know the name of the PR genius. They did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time. They had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people, how to scare the shit out of the American people. It was a phony war.
Where did that war come from? You know what? It's quite surprising. That war came from Netanyahu, actually. You know that?
It's weird. And the way it is is that Netanyahu had from 1995 onward the theory that the only way we're gonna get rid of Hamas and Hezbollah is by toppling the governments that support them. That's Iraq, Syria, and Iran. And the guy's nothing if not obsessive. And we're he's still trying to get us to fight Iran this day, this week.
He's a deep, dark son of a bitch. Sorry to tell you. Because he's gotten us into endless wars, and because of the power of all of this, in The US politics, he's gotten his way. But that war was totally phony. So what is this democracy versus dictatorship?
Come on. This is these are not even sensible terms.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a supercut of prominent Democrats, including Biden and Obama, pledging to preemptively attack Iran over nuclear concerns. While they talked, Trump took action, and now Democrats are in a frenzy. Their hypocrisy is evident; they seem to be the party of liars and traitors.
@LightOnLiberty - Bridgett Fertig
A democrat supercut: Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Kamala Harris pledging to attack Iran preemptively to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. They talked, Trump walked. I don't see any problem here. The democrats are now melting down just because President Trump followed through. The hypocrisy of the democrat party shows each and every day - they're the party of liars, thieves and Traitors.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United States will not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon. An attack on Iran would occur if, during the next ten years, they considered launching an attack on Israel. The U.S. would be able to totally obliterate them.
A nuclear-armed Iran is a challenge that cannot be contained. It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf nations, and the stability of the global economy, risking a nuclear arms race and the unraveling of the non-proliferation treaty. The United States will do what it must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Ensuring that Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power is one of the highest priorities.
Iran's key nuclear and nuclear facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: United States is clear. We will not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: If I'm the president, we will attack Iran. Whatever stage of development they might be in their nuclear weapons program in the next ten years during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them. That's a terrible thing to say, but those people who run Iran need to understand that.
Speaker 2: Make no mistake, a nuclear armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained. It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf nations, and the stability of the global economy. It risks triggering a nuclear arms race in the region and the unraveling of the non proliferation treaty. That's why a coalition of countries is holding the Iranian government accountable. And that's why The United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
As long as I'm president of The United States, Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. I've made that clear when I came into office.
Speaker 3: And look, I mean, has American blood on their hands. K? And what we saw in terms of just the the this attack on Israel, 200 ballistic missiles. What we need to do to ensure that Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power, that is one of my highest priorities.
Speaker 0: So if you
Speaker 1: have proof that Thank
Speaker 0: you very much. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear and nuclear facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸
Never forget Trump posted a video explaining all the endless wars in Iraq and Syria, etc. came from Netanyahu. Netanyahu “is STILL trying to get us to fight Iran to this day” Nothing is what it seems. https://t.co/EKfwIUsaMr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the war in Syria began with Obama tasking the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government four years before Russia intervened. They allege the New York Times rarely reported on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad.
Regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the speaker asserts it was based on phony pretenses and that focus groups were used to determine how to sell the war to the American people. They claim the war originated with Netanyahu, who believed toppling Iraq, Syria, and Iran would eliminate Hamas and Hezbollah. The speaker accuses Netanyahu of pushing the U.S. into endless wars and trying to instigate a war with Iran. They conclude that the concepts of "democracy versus dictatorship" are not sensible terms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The war in Syria. And you may actually hear from grown up reporters who are lying through their teeth or ignorant beyond imagining that, oh, the war in Syria. Yes. Russia intervened in Syria. Well, do you know that the that Obama tasked the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government starting four years before Russia intervened?
What kind of nonsense is that? And how many times did the New York Times report on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad? Three times in ten years. This is not democracy. This is a game, and it's a game of narrative.
Why did The US invade Iraq in 02/2003? Well, first of all, it was completely phony pretenses. It wasn't, oh, we were so wrong. They didn't have weapons of mass destruction. They actually did focus groups in the February to find out what would sell that war to the American people.
Abe Schultzky, if you wanna know the name of the PR genius. They did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time. They had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people, how to scare the shit out of the American people. It was a phony war.
Where did that war come from? You know what? It's quite surprising. That war came from Netanyahu, actually. You know that?
It's weird. And the way it is is that Netanyahu had from 1995 onward the theory that the only way we're gonna get rid of Hamas and Hezbollah is by toppling the governments that support them. That's Iraq, Syria, and Iran. And the guy's nothing if not obsessive. And we're he's still trying to get us to fight Iran this day, this week.
He's a deep, dark son of a bitch. Sorry to tell you. Because he's gotten us into endless wars, and because of the power of all of this, in The US politics, he's gotten his way. But that war was totally phony. So what is this democracy versus dictatorship?
Come on. This is these are not even sensible terms.
@Hunter_Eagleman - Hunter Eagleman™
Y’all remember when Biden gave Russia and Putin the OK for a “minor incursion” into Ukraine? 🤔 https://t.co/mCMTbUfi2V
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker outlines conditional accountability for Russia, dependent on the actions taken. "Russia will be held accountable if it invades, and it depends on what it does." "It's one thing if it's a minor incursion, and then we end up having to fight about what to do and not do, etcetera." This indicates consequences hinge on the scale and specifics of any invasion, rather than a single fixed response. The remark about a minor incursion implies that the response could differ from a larger violation, potentially leading to debate over appropriate measures. Overall, the stance emphasizes that accountability and reaction depend on the nature of the incursion, with ongoing debate about appropriate steps.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I think what you're gonna see is that Russia will be held accountable if it invades, and it depends on what it does. It's one thing if it's a minor incursion, and then we end up having to fight about what to do and not do, etcetera.
@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci
Buried 2007 video of Senator Joe Biden discussing troop removal from Afghanistan. It would be a SHAME if everyone saw this. "And you leave those billions of dollars of weapons behind I promise they're going to be used against your grandchild and mine some day" - The Big Guy https://t.co/vzQ5FQRZLf
Video Transcript AI Summary
'If tomorrow, the order goes out from the I'm president of The United States. I issue an order. End the war today. Begin to withdraw all American troops.' 'It will take a year to get the American troops out.' 'If you leave all the equipment behind, you might be able to do it in seven months.' 'And you leave those billions of dollars of weapons behind, I promise they're gonna be used against your grandchild and mine someday.' 'And you leave those billions of dollars of weapons behind, I promise they're gonna be used against your grandchild and mine someday.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big difference to tell the American people the truth about what our options are in ending this war. If tomorrow, the order goes out from the I'm president of The United States. I issue an order. End the war today. Begin to withdraw all American troops.
It will take a year to get the American troops out. Do you hear me now? That's the truth. It will take a year to get them physically out. Now if you leave all the equipment behind, you might be able to do it in seven months.
And you leave those billions of dollars of weapons behind, I promise they're gonna be used against your grandchild and mine someday. And you leave those billions of dollars of weapons behind, I promise they're gonna be used against your grandchild and mine someday.
@Mollyploofkins - Molly Ploofkins
Trump in 2008: Anyone who invades the Middle East under false pretenses should be impeached. https://t.co/MPOOmUL2qI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says, “Nancy Pelosi, the speaker? Well, you know, when she first got in and was named speaker, I met her and I'm very impressed by her. I think she's a very impressive person. I like her a lot.” He was surprised she didn’t do more in terms of Bush or go after him, noting it “almost seemed like she was gonna really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office.” He adds, “Impeaching him? Absolute for the war. For the war. Because of the conduct. Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies.” He asserts Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction and other things that turned out not to be true. He contrasts this with Bill Clinton, saying, “
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nancy Pelosi, the speaker? Well, you know, when she first got in and was named speaker, I met her and I'm very impressed by her. I think she's a very impressive person. I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush.
It was almost it just seemed like she was gonna really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which personally I think would have been a wonderful thing. Impeaching him? Absolute for the war. For the war. Because of the conduct Well, he lied.
He got us into the war with lies. And, I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant, and they tried to impeach him which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true.