reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 24, 2023 at 2:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The global impact of COVID-19 vaccines is under scrutiny due to potential side effects. Studies reveal cases of myocarditis in individuals after receiving booster shots. Experts argue that the mRNA vaccine platform should be suspended as it may induce self-destruction. Critics claim that the vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective, and unsafe. Lack of knowledge in immunology and virology among doctors and scientists is concerning. The pandemic has exposed a conspiracy of psychopaths, aided by narcissistic lackeys. It is time for humanity to unite, challenge the prevailing narrative, and demand a better future.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

Thread⬇️⬇️ (1 to 20) The house of corona cards had fallen before it was constructed. "Unless All of Us Resist, Never Again is Now! (Vera Sharav, survivor of the Holocaust) (Who are really the insane criminals?) WE MUST FINALLY END THIS GLOBAL INSANITY, NOW!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares their experience of being falsely accused and arrested for speaking out against COVID-19 restrictions in Switzerland. They were not armed and had no psychiatric history, but were still forced into closed psychiatry. The authorities gave them a choice: stay in the psychiatric hospital for 6 weeks or go home and continue working while taking medication. They were monitored through blood checks to ensure compliance. The speaker criticizes these methods as reminiscent of Soviet and GDR practices. They clarify that while the authorities considered them "corona insane," they disagreed. This incident occurred in Switzerland in April 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. They could not arrest me because I did I did saw nothing wrong. They realized this after 1 hour. There was no threat of anybody, and I was also, I was not armed and I had no psychiatric history, of course. All these allegations of this, labellers were wrong. And, so they couldn't arrest me. So obviously, they tried something else and they didn't know how to to, deal with me. So they they pulled me into closed psychiatry. But then they they gave me the the, opportunity to decide. Either you stay here in the in the psychiatric hospital for 6 weeks to have treated this mania, or you can leave and go home and continue to work, but you must take a medication. And they I was forced to take a neuroleptic and whether I took it or not was weakly controlled by a blood check. So these I mean, these are really Soviet style, GDR style, psychiatric methods. Speaker 1: This is outrageous. So this is Switzerland. For everybody listening right now, I want you to all know that this is happening in Switzerland and you were forced to take a psychiatric medication because you spoke out against COVID nineteen restrictions and measures. Am I right? Speaker 0: Yes. But, of course, these, as I said, the corona insane other side decided I must be corona insane. So, from their point of view, this was, of course, correct. But from my point of view, this was completely wrong. Yeah, this is this was Switzerland or in April 2020.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(1/20) This desperately downplayed study found a horrendous amount of 2.8% (3.7% in women, 0.8% in men) myocarditis in employees of the University Hospital Basel three days after the booster injection with Spikevax© (brought to you by MODeRNA). https://www.myscience.org/news/wire/temporary_mild_damage_to_heart_muscle_cells_after_covid_19_booster_vaccination-2022-unibas

Temporary mild damage to heart muscle cells after Covid-19 booster vaccination 9.11.2022 - An interdisciplinary research team from the University of Basel and the University Hospital Basel has studied the effects of the Covid-19 booster vaccination on the heart muscle. According to their findings, which have not yet been peer-reviewed, mild damage is more common than previously thought. Cardiologist Professor Christian M�ller talks about the results in an interview. myscience.org

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(2/20) Those data are consistent with the Thai prospective cohort study in adolescents after the 2nd dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 'Vaccine'. Seven participants (2.3%) exhibited at least one elevated cardiac biomarker or positive lab assessments. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36006288/

Cardiovascular Manifestation of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescents - PubMed This study focuses on cardiovascular manifestation, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis events, after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine injection in Thai adolescents. This prospective cohort study enrolled students aged 13-18 years from two schools, who received the second dose of the BNT162b2 mR … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(3/20) The same Prof. Christian Müller was co-author of the, as written based on exactly zero reliable data, totally irresponsible "Position Paper of the Swiss Society of Cardiology". He came late, but he came. My e-mail to the authors got no answer. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34668687/

The very low risk of myocarditis and pericarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination should not discourage vaccination - PubMed The benefits of vaccination - regarding COVID-19 infection and transmission, as well as COVID-associated complications - clearly outweigh the potential risk of vaccine-associated inflammation of the heart and other adverse events. Given the current state of knowledge, the outcome of myocarditis and … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(4/20) Myocarditis & myocardial infarction, another cardiac side effect of the modRNA & DNA injections, can cause cardiac arrest due to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, mainly when catecholamine levels are high (effort, stress & early morning hours).

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

This, once again, underlines my statement as a cardiologist with thesis in immunology and virology, that unexpected deaths in close temporal relation to the injections are to be considered as caused by these injections, until proven otherwise.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

ModRNA induced cardiac arrests do not only occur in athletes. They happen at all ages. Insist that every unexpected death of a jabbed person is examined by autopsy, including histology of all organs & immunohistochemistry for spike & nucleocapsid protein! https://doctors4covidethics.org/vascular-and-organ-damage-induced-by-mrna-vaccines-irrefutable-proof-of-causality/

Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality This article summarizes evidence from experimental studies and from autopsies of patients deceased after vaccination. mRNA vaccines travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs and induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs. The vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation, which can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome. doctors4covidethics.org

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(5/20) There has long been no doubt that this vaccination disaster is one of the greatest, if not the greatest, humanitarian catastrophes to date, wrought by a handful of criminal psychopaths and their many totally irresponsible narcissistic lackeys.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

If we multiply the reported deaths temporally associated with the unnecessary, negatively effective, life-threatening modRNA injections by the underreporting factor of 41 (CDC), in🇨🇭we get > 10 000 injection deaths in the absence of evidence that they saved one single human life.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(6/20) Still, the ever same modelers, paid by the ever same criminals, try to save their necks by inventing > 14 000 000 lives, saved with the long proven unnecessary, negatively effective, life-threatening modRNA & DNA shots, out of the fact free vacuum.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

While the ever same modelers paid by the ever same criminals claim the unnecessary, negatively effective, life-threatening shots saved >14M lives, reported cases suggest they killed >10M lives in the absence of evidence that they saved one single life. https://doctors4covidethics.org/the-watson-et-al-modeling-study-did-covid-vaccinations-really-prevent-14-million-deaths/

The Watson et al. “modeling study”: did “COVID vaccinations” really prevent 14 million deaths? The hypothesis (published in the medical journal THE LANCET Infectious Diseases on June 23, 2022) that the COVID “vaccinations” prevented 14 million “COVID deaths” and thus significantly mitigated the severity of the “pandemic” is based on unrealistic figures and demonstrably false calculations. doctors4covidethics.org

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(7/20) The totally flawed modRNA "vaccine" platform must be suspended, because it induces self against non-self destruction, similar to transplant rejection, of the cells who are coerced to produce and then present the foreign protein on their surface. https://rumble.com/v18fmbn-a-clinical-perspective-and-synopsis-with-thomas-binder-md.html

A CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE AND SYNOPSIS WITH THOMAS BINDER MD Doctors for Covid Ethics: THE FOURTH SYMPOSIUM with UK Column Freedom is the Cure Unpacking & Defeating the Medical Tactics of a World Takeover June 11, 2022 Session 1 A CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE AND SYNOP rumble.com

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(8/20) If we have some very basic knowledge of medicine, virology and immunology, have read their pivotal studies and have some common sense, we knew that the modRNA and DNA injections were unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe before their roll-out.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

From 02/20 I explained the corona nonsense narrative & the unnecessary, ineffective, unsafe jabs. 03/21 I was suspended. @Tom_Rumi was reinstated. For the sake of humanity, please reinstate also my main account @Thomas_Binder, so that I can spread my tweets ⬇️ - thanks @elonmusk!

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(9/20) If we have some very basic knowledge of medicine, virology and immunology and have some common sense, we could easily debunk the prevailing corona nonsense narrative, an intellectual stillbirth, right from the start.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

Three connected unwashed brain cells were enough to debunk the prevailing corona nonsense narrative right from the start. Our, Doctors for Covid Ethics (D4CE), full third symposium on February 18, 2022: https://doctors4covidethics.org/coming-symposium/ https://rumble.com/vvfrr3-the-falling-of-the-house-of-cards-with-thomas-binder-md.html

Gold Standard Covid Science in Practice – An Interdisciplinary Symposium III: THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE Organized by Doctors For Covid Ethics Hosted by UK Column Livestream: 18th February, 2022 18.00 – 22.00 (GMT) / 19.00-23.00 (CET) Livestream Recording: Edited Replays: Session I with Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi: The Case is Closed – the Final Evidence Session II with Prof. Michael Palmer:The Future Scientific and Legal Aspects Session III with Catherine Austin Fitts:Covid-19 and the Global Coup Programme PDF 19:00 CET Program Overview doctors4covidethics.org
THE FALLING OF THE HOUSE OF CARDS WITH THOMAS BINDER MD D4CE Symposium III with Highly Acclaimed International Scientists, Lawyers and Economists held on February 18, 2022. SESSION I THE CASE IS CLOSED – THE FINAL EVIDENCE WITH PROF. SUCHARIT BHAKDI MD htt rumble.com

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(10/20) I still cannot believe that most doctors & scientists nowadays obviously have not the slightest knowledge of the most basic immunology & virology, and this globally. There are many great textbooks in immunology & virology, even some for laypeople.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

I am certainly happy that MDs like @DrAseemMalhotra & co-inventor of modRNA craze (injecting it without control over which cells translate it in what effective dose is insane) @RWMaloneMD are speaking up. However, I wonder why it took them 15 to 30 months to go from zero to hero.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

If we just do our duty as doctors to the best of our knowledge, among colleagues who are nothing but zeroes we may appear as heroes.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(11/20) I also cannot believe that even most doctors took part in this pandemic of cowards. As the corona cultists have no argument against our evidence based defragmented contextualised facts, their only weapons are money, bluffing, censorship and libel.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

@elonmusk When I was brutally arrested in my practice because a libeler told the prime minister of my🇨🇭province I was armed, had a psychiatric history, & threatened the government, they found out all allegations were wrong & asked me about the year: I answered 1984.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

I explain the prevailing corona nonsense narrative, the unnecessary, negatively effective, life-threatening experimental modRNA injections and my brutal arrest, psychiatric detention and forced medication in🇨🇭in April 2020. Full terview by @_taylorhudak: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/dr-thomas-binder-interview-how-psychology-weaponized-suppress-truth-age-covid/

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was wrongfully accused and detained in Switzerland for speaking out against COVID-19 restrictions. Despite no evidence of any wrongdoing, they couldn't arrest me. Instead, they forced me into closed psychiatry and gave me a choice: stay in the psychiatric hospital for 6 weeks or go home and continue working while taking medication. I was compelled to take a neuroleptic, and my compliance was monitored through blood checks. These methods resembled Soviet and GDR-style psychiatry. It's important to note that this happened in Switzerland in April 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. They could not arrest me because I did I did saw nothing wrong. They realized this after 1 hour. There was no threat of anybody, and I was also, I was not armed and I had no psychiatric history, of course. All these allegations of this, labellers were wrong. And, so they couldn't arrest me. So obviously, they tried something else and they didn't know how to to, deal with me. So they they pulled me into closed psychiatry. But then they they gave me the the, opportunity to decide. Either you stay here in the in the psychiatric hospital for 6 weeks to have treated this mania, or you can leave and go home and continue to work, but you must take a medication. And they I was forced to take a neuroleptic and whether I took it or not was weakly controlled by a blood check. So these I mean, these are really Soviet style, GDR style, psychiatric methods. Speaker 1: This is outrageous. So this is Switzerland. For everybody listening right now, I want you to all know that this is happening in Switzerland and you were forced to take a psychiatric medication because you spoke out against COVID nineteen restrictions and measures. Am I right? Speaker 0: Yes. But, of course, these, as I said, the corona insane other side decided I must be corona insane. So, from their point of view, this was, of course, correct. But from my point of view, this was completely wrong. Yeah, this is this was Switzerland or in April 2020.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(12/20) Who would be legitimised more to call out this scientific, medical and humanitarian disaster of unprecedented proportion than an empathetic, brave Holocaust survivor? "Unless All of Us Resist, Never Again is Now! (Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor)

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

Although planned & implemented brutally by psychopaths, including some in Jews clothing, first victims were Israelis and death count highly likely >10M & counting, you must not, under any circumstance, compare the global modRNA genocide with the Holocaust! https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/eu-issues/vera-sharav-unless-all-of-us-resist-never-again-is-now-75th-anniversary-of-the-nuremberg-code/

Vera Sharav “Unless All of Us Resist, Never Again is Now” – Full Speech (video+transcript) – Nuremberg, August 20, 2022 The moral significance of the Nuremberg Code — the most authoritative, internationally recognized document in the history of medical ethics — cannot be overstated, said Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor and founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection. On August 20, a compelling line-up of international speakers traveled to Nuremberg to commemorate the 75th Anniversary... childrenshealthdefense.eu

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(13/20) I don't know how you feel. I for one am sick & tired of living in Plato's media hell with its countless virtual realities projected on a huge flat screen & being dominated by infantile, irresponsible, narcissistic urban idiots & their puppeteers.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

As a 61 yo empathetic responsible human, (grand)father & doctor I am sick of being dominated by infantile, irresponsible, narcissistic village idiots living in their CO2, corona & Putin fairy tale worlds. Play in Plato's cave, but leave us responsible adults in the reality alone!

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(14/20) Belief in science is belief, not science! We can calmly & serenely confront the myths, invented by the counter-rationalists out of a fact-free vacuum, with reality resting on a solid base of defragmented, contextualised facts PENG they instantly self-destruct publicly.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(15/20) We cannot understand humanity if we do not realise that we ~98% empathetic people are dominated and abused by a handful of the ~2% psychopaths for their selfish goals, that among us sheep live wolves, the most dangerous those in sheep's clothing. http://fisheadmovie.com

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(16/20) Psychopaths cannot create a "Banality of Evil". Only the many narcissistic lackeys, Hannah Arendt called them "Hanswursts", who (un)consciously join a conspiracy of a handful criminal psychopaths for selfish motives & the coward silent majority can make such evil happen.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(17/20) Mr Global, an illusory giant inflated with nothing but money & lukewarm air, has always been panicked by us 98% empathetic humans. He rules by divide & conquer and concealing true & false until we no longer even know whether we are male or female.

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

To those who think that many photos and videos from China, Bergamo, New York, Ukraine, etc. couldn't possibly be staged, I always recommend remembering #IncubatorLie2.0, directed by #AlCIAda in Eastern Aleppo. https://www.thomasbinder.ch/post/al-jazeeras-inkubatorl%C3%BCge-2-0

Al Jazeeras Inkubatorlüge 2.0 #Inkubatorlüge2.0 der angeblichen Bombardierung angeblicher Frühgeburten in Inkubatoren durch den angeblichen Schlächter von Kindern Assad thomasbinder.ch

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(18/20) Do not trust any "expert", including me! Take many perspectives, then ask yourself: Could what seems incredibly complicated in fact not be incredibly simple? Could psychopaths have managed to impose their psychopathy on society by simply turning everything topsy-turvy?

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(19/20) Guys, we responsible empathetic humans are about 98%. Let's all take a booster of guts, leave Plato's dark cave, live as a human family together in freedom & peace in the bright sunlight & let's finally send Mr Global to where he belongs: to lifelong custody. Venceremos!

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

(20/20) Dear @elonmusk! By censorship, the evil counter-rationalists were able to cause far too much suffering & death. Thanks for recognising. But many of us very early enlighteners are still waiting for their total vindication, e.g. me (@Thomas_Binder)!

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

Thanks, @elonmusk, but this was my backup account after you had suspended my main account on March 30th 2021 ,where I had posted nothing but the reality aka the truth since March 2010. Please reinstate also my main account @Thomas_Binder - thank you! #ReinstateDrThomasBinder

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

P.S. Dear fellow humans! These were my 2 cents. I hope, you'll find my other cents on my reinstated main account soon. Just in case that my tweets, threads & thread webs, my "books" I never had the time to write, in @Thomas_Binder will not be reinstated:

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

P.P.S. Should I not have been able to wake you up yet, perhaps this piece might help you after all? But waking up is not enough. You also have to stand up, if not for yourself, then for a free, self-determined future worth living of your (grand)children! https://rumble.com/v21mgvs-d4ce-5th-symposium-session-iv-understanding-tactics-of-oppression.html

D4CE 5th Symposium - Session IV Understanding Tactics of Oppression With Taylor Hudák, Meryl Nass, Liz Evans, Daniel Broudy, and Valerie Kyrie Journalist Taylor Hudak MA introduced Session IV by acknowledging the many courageous doctors and scientists persecuted for t rumble.com

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

P.P.P.S.-1/2 https://t.co/L17zt2zeJm

@Tom_Rumi - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (2nd account not supervised)

P.P.P.S.-2/2 https://t.co/ifTC17uyMV

Saved - March 10, 2023 at 5:44 AM

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

My tweets about natural immunity, and more importantly the voices of my constituents posted on that tweet, were censored because truth presented a threat to the government-Pharma agenda of mandated vaccines. @mtaibbi@ShellenbergerMD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mr. Massey discusses the weaponization of the CDC against the American people and their misrepresentation of vaccine efficacy. He recounts his conversations with CDC officials and their failure to correct false information on their website. He also highlights the CDC's partnership with Twitter and their tracking of congressional tweets. Mr. Massey raises concerns about censorship and the suppression of free speech, particularly regarding discussions on natural immunity. The witnesses further emphasize the importance of allowing open dialogue and the need for truth and reconciliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gentleman yields back. Gentleman from Kentucky, Mr. Massey, is recognized for 5 minutes. Speaker 1: I want to talk about the weaponization of the CDC against the American people, and this overlaps with one of the Twitter files, number 13 by my account, actually by Alex Berenson, not one of our 2 witnesses, but I would like to comment on it. A week before Christmas 2020, the vaccines came out. The FDA curated the Pfizer trial results, and then the CDC curated the FDA's opinion. The CDC said in their MMWR, which is never peer reviewed, they're very proud that it's not peer reviewed, they treat it like science, it's not science. They said that the vaccine was 92% efficacious for people who had already had COVID. The Pfizer trial data had said no such thing. In fact, There was no support for that claim, so I called up the head of the CDC, recorded the conversation, the head in Washington DC. She said she'd get the top scientists on the line. There was a snowstorm that day, so I was impressed. She got this top scientist on the line. They said I was eagle eye massie. They couldn't believe how that statement had made it into their report and that I was absolutely correct. There was no support for it. So, I said, how are you gonna fix it? You're gonna redact it? You're gonna change it? What are you gonna do? They said, we'll do all of that. I said, great. A month later, It was still on their website. I made some more phone calls. They brought in an old hand, an old fixer, Doctor. Shushat. These are her notes with, of of her phone call with me about natural immunity in January, when I called them out on it again, these are the entirety of her notes that were obtained, in my FOIA from somebody, a third party. I took all of my recordings, released them to Cheryl Atkinson. She she blew the whistle on this. People a lot of people have forgotten about it. Here's here's why I find it interesting, and I'm gonna tie it into the Twitter files. And by the way, I told them I was not anti vaxx. I said the problem with your story is there's a misallocation of vaccines which are not available for all the old people in Kentucky, but you got young people in Kentucky taking them because you're telling them on the website even if you've had COVID, go get it. So that was my complaint. On May 20 or May 10, 2021, Todd O'Boyle, this name will come up in a Twitter file later. He is the top lobbyist in Twitter's Washington office who was also is Twitter's point of contact in the White House. He encouraged the CDC to enroll in the, partner support program. Oh, okay. The CDC is now a partner with Twitter because they're in the partner support program. They he said, In the future, that's the best way to get a spreadsheet like this reviewed. Now, this is an email from, between Todd O'Boyle and, and the folks at CDC. By the way, let me let me, talk to this too. This is these are more of my conversations with the CDC, completely redacted the subject thereof. Next next one, please. I also found as a result of the FOIA, CDC tracks every tweet that a congressman puts out, not just republican, but democrat. They keep the spreadsheet. They make it every week. This showed up in the FOIA for me because I'm in their spreadsheet that they track. Why is this interesting? Okay. So they're tracking congressman's tweets At CDC, they're enrolled in the partner support, portal at, at Twitter. And then I found, This is why, I found Alex Berenson's report very interesting because, what he found out is that Scott Gottlieb Worked hard and and Twitter complied, it looks like, to censor a tweet from a doctor about natural immunity. Guess what? On the same day that that doctor's tweet was censored, so were my tweets on natural immunity. Why is this important? What is what is consequential about the date? This is 3 days after the military vaccine mandate came out and a week before the federal vaccine mandates came out. This Truth was toxic to to a narrative that Pfizer was spreading, that Joe Biden wanted out there so that he could force the vaccine on everybody whether you'd at natural immunity or not. Now, I actually you guys might not agree with me on this. I don't think the press gets special privileges on the first amendment. I think I don't think Congress does. I think every American by virtue of being an American has the right to free speech enshrined in the constitution. So I'm not so much worried that they they, censored us a congressman, but they disabled all the comments from my constituents. Those are the voices they squelched. And my beef is not with Twitter, but my beef is with the CDC and these federal agencies, and, I encourage you all if you can to find more about this. And, do you have any either of you have any comments on this topic? Speaker 2: Yeah. America. Speaker 0: The gentleman's timing expired, but the gentleman may the the witnesses may respond. Speaker 2: Just quickly, we found just yesterday a tweet from, the the Virality Project at Stanford, which is partnered with a a number of government agencies and Twitter, where they talk explicitly about, Censoring stories of true vaccine side effects, and other true stories that they felt, encouraged hesitancy. Now the import the Since from true? Yes. So they used the word true three times, in this email. And what's what's notable about this is that it reflects The fundamental misunderstanding of this whole disinformation complex, anti disinformation complex, they believe that ordinary people can't handle, difficult truths. And so they think that they need minders to separate out things that are controversial or difficult, for them. And that's again, it's totally contrary to what America's all about, I think. Speaker 3: I would just briefly add, this is Very disturbing because what they're doing when they're putting these labels on there is they're actually also trying to discredit you. So it's not just, it's a form of censorship, but it's also a a disinformation campaign. And I think what Massa is really important to understand. I mean, we went from you go from a situation where we were fighting ISIS recruiting, and then it was Russian disinformation, And now they're in a situation where they're wanting to censor true information, accurate facts, because they're worried that people might Behave in ways that they don't want them to, that involves mind reading at a level that is grossly inappropriate. I mean, I I worry even about making this defense because let's remember, The first amendment protects our right to be wrong. Mhmm. It protects our right to lie. I mean, it's bizarre to me that we would need to make a defense of the first amendment and remind people We have a right to be and being wrong, as Matt was explaining, is a big part of being a human being and having a democracy. So this is disturbing and chilling, and you're absolutely right to be outraged by it. There needs to be a full truth and reconciliation that I hope everybody Would appreciate, having on this issue because a lot of bad behavior has come out about what they've done. Speaker 1: American. Thank you. Neobank. Speaker 0: Good job, gentlemen. This time has expired. We now
Saved - April 13, 2023 at 10:29 PM

@annabeth9691 - annabeth

Very brave nurse and veteran standing up! Hospital protocol kills!!! #COVID19 #CrimesAgainsHumanity #accountability (make sure to watch all 4 parts)

Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman, Erin Olszewski, speaks in support of the Collier Health Freedom Bill of Rights Ordinance and the health freedom resolution. She emphasizes the importance of her background as a mom, registered nurse, author, and army combat veteran. Erin expresses her commitment to protecting her children, patients, and the public. She mentions her book, which has been censored and not made available in bookstores. Erin highlights her oath to her country and patients, stating that it never expires.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Need to listen very closely to this next clip that I pay that I play. This, this woman is very courageous, and she is putting everything on the line because she took an oath not only as a combat veteran, but as a nurse as well. And she is living up to that oath. And there's a lot of you out there in the medical industry and a lot of you out there in the military that you are not living up to your oath. This is what a real soldier looks like. This is what a real nurse looks like that takes an oath and stands by it. And for those of you that aren't, maybe you need to follow her lead. Homer Jennings. Aaron has been ceded additional time from James Rosenberger. James, are you here? She will have a total of 6 minutes. Speaker 1: Good morning, commissioners. Thank you guys so much for having me here and also listening to all of us. It's very unheard of these days. My name is Erin Olszewski and I'm here in support of the Collier Health Freedom Bill of Rights Ordinance and the she's a health freedom resolution. A little bit about my background and why it's important that you understand how imperative it is What I'm about to share with you is in your decision today. First, I'm a mom. I have 3 boys. I'm here to protect them, But I'm also here to protect and defend your children and grandchildren as well. I'm a registered nurse. I'm here to stand up for my patients And honor those who have died unnecessarily. I'm an author of a book that is no longer allowed on bookshelves, which I'm going to give each of you a copy to read because of censorship. She They won't even put it on bookshelves so people won't find out what's going on. And also, I'm an army combat veteran. I served over a year in Iraq, 2003 and 2004, Commissioner Locastro, thank you for your service, and Commissioner Cowell, thank you for your service as well. My oath never expires, not only to my country, but also to my patients.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares their experience working in the COVID ICU at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, New York. They emphasize that the situation was not limited to New York, but was happening nationwide, including in Florida. They describe witnessing a disturbing assembly line-like process where patients were treated poorly and family members were banned. The speaker criticizes politicians and government interference in the doctor-patient relationship. They mention financial incentives for admitting patients and the neglectful protocols followed. They recount seeing patients with severe bed sores and feces dried on their backs. The speaker reveals that full code patients were not being resuscitated and were ultimately placed in body bags.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From Florida in the Tampa Bay area to New York, to work in the COVID ICU. I actually was placed at the epicenter of the epicenter, which is Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, New York. I just want to make this very clear that this was not just solely happening in New York, all around our great nation including Florida and more specifically right here in your county. I know this because upon my return after getting kicked out of New York trying to advocate for my patients, I began advocating for patients all around Florida. The same situation in every single hospital. What I witnessed in New York can only be described as a turnkey style assembly line to a body bag. There's no liability. There was gag orders on all of our staff, including myself. We were threatened to be sent home if we said anything. They banned family members, which are the patient's advocates, which should never happen ever again. They banned treatments. I always say that politicians make lousy doctors. A politician. Our government should never get in between the doctor patient relationship ever again. If they wanted to do that, they can go to medical school and become a nurse. There's financial incentives put on admissions of patients, so $13,000 to admit patients. Why not? We were actually ordered down from sending any of the patients to the comfort ship, which was wide open. The Javits Center was empty. This Good Samaritan tents were empty. They admitted them for $13,000 a person. The protocols consisted of sedation, paralyzing agents, and then essentially events. Some of the patients' rooms that I went into, there's feces dried up their backs for 2, 3 weeks. They had bed sores where you could see their bones. They were coding full code patients. Being a full code means that you want all resuscitation done, all measures done. CPR, you want to be saved. They were not doing that and they were not doing it behind locked hospital doors and nobody knew except for the people that were in there. They ended up in a in a body bag. Eventually we just had garbage bags, and then they were tossed into the
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares a disturbing experience where patients died and their bodies were stacked in freezer trucks, but not from COVID. Autopsies were banned and there were price hikes for ventilators and deaths. Feeling unable to speak up, the speaker decided to go undercover and recorded conversations for four weeks. They play a clip of a doctor who didn't properly care for a patient, wrote her death certificate before she died, and lied to her family. The speaker believes it's important for the public to know about these unethical practices. They question why the hospital staff didn't act differently if family or ethics committees were present. The speaker asks for opinions on what the right thing to do in that situation would be.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every single one of my patients outside of 1 patient died and I had to stack their bodies in these freezer trucks but they were not dying of COVID. And on top of that, they ended up banning autopsies. So there was a $39,000 price hike for the ventilators and sometimes $10,000 for each death. It's absolutely disgusting. I tried to say something and I was unable to. I was threatened with being sent home, so I decided that I was going to go undercover. Got some spy glasses, got some audio gear, and I started recording for the next 4 weeks. I'd like to share a little clip if I could because I think that it's very important that you actually here with your own ears. What is actually, what happened, what continues to happen to this very day in the hospital? This is a seasoned medical doctor working at the New York City hospital. He was on a travel assignment. He was making approximately $75,000 a week. Nurses were getting $10,000 a week, so this was harsh money in my opinion. He ended up calling all the nurses together after he was essentially busted for not coating a full coated patient, actually wrote her death certificate before she even died and then called the family and lied to them. But I'd like to just have this on record because I think it's very important that the public know that this happened and this was going on. If there was family in the room. If the ethics committees was in there and Jacob was standing in the room, you guys wouldn't do what you guys just did. You guys would have been way more proactive. The barrel. And that's what I'm wondering because if you and you're watching the same well, we wanna know the same thing regardless this. If someone was watching us right now, then I'd be like, all right, fine. But I don't feel like that's the case. Let me ask you a question. And just whatever your opinion is, what do you think the right thing to do for her is in that setting? Let
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the lack of motivation to contact family members during emergencies. They believe that not allowing good nurses to do their job is equivalent to a death sentence for patients. The speaker emphasizes the importance of this issue and urges listeners to consider the impact on their own families. They suggest that anyone opposing their resolution may not be trustworthy or may have something to hide. The speaker concludes by stating that this issue is not only important for Floridians but for humanity as a whole.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And When she was crashing, it was 115, 120. Yeah. So if you don't want to motivate you, you need to aggressively contact your family So we could have been on before this happened. Totally agree. I'm going to cut it short. I know that my time is short, but that's clearly murder. Yeah. I'm just going to end with this. The last thing standing between a patient and body bag is a good nurse. If a good nurse isn't allowed Sorry. This is tough. Sorry. If a good nurse isn't allowed to do her job. Sorry. Sorry. But it's an automatic death sentence for our patients and we're forced to watch them die unnecessarily. And now we have to live with that reality forever in our hearts and our souls. And you know, a lot of us have been holding the line for a really long time. You. It could be your family members next time. And in any person that's in opposition of this resolution in the ordinance is likely someone that you don't want taking care of you or they have something to hide. So on this with this, United, we stand against those we trusted. I hope that you guys will really dig deep in your souls and your hearts and understand that This is good for humanity, not only Floridians but all over the world. God bless you and thank you for listening to me.
Saved - June 17, 2023 at 9:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Nicholls, a known political activist, is leading the GoodLawProject action against Dr. Aseem Malhotra. Nicholls presided over a 50 COVID death rate, with ten patients dying at SWBHnhs that should not have died. It's important to understand that political activism like this is now a cancer invading medicine. Nicholls is also running a hate campaign to remove any doctor speaking out about pharma safety.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

WHOA! It turns out that @djnicholl is a known political activist and is leading the @GoodLawProject action against @DrAseemMalhotra.... Who presided over a 50% COVID death rate. TEN patients died at @SWBHnhs that should not have died. #3tablets https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539735/

Nosocomial spread of COVID-19: lessons learned from an audit on a stroke/neurology ward in a UK district general hospital We describe the details of a COVID-19 outbreak in a 25-bedded Birmingham neurology/stroke ward in the early phase of the pandemic (March to May 2020). Twenty-one of 133 admissions (16%) tested positive for COVID-19 and of those, 8 (6% of all admissions ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

It's important to understand that political activism like this is now a cancer invading medicine. We exposed it in #ECMOgate. Doctors who have extremist beliefs in a doctrine such that they would rather the patient die than they reject the doctrine.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

There is no excuse for 50% of your COVID patients dying. @btysonmd's death rate was 0.1%, and Nicholl's was over 40%. I suspect some of those patients were given #midazolam as we also exposed, because that was the time that #NG163 was in force.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

So here is Dr Nicholls in his element, speaking to a LibDem (woke left) conference and criticising @elonmusk for his "thin skin"

Video Transcript AI Summary
David Nichol introduces himself as a Twitter user but mentions that he may switch to Mastodon due to Elon Musk's sensitivity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. So my name's, David Nichol. I'm still on Twitter at the moment, but if at the end of this talk, you can find me on Mastodon due to Elon's rather thin skin.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Which is pretty rich. When I exposed him a week ago for being behind the astroturf @GoodLawProject "action" against @DrAseemMalhotra... I got the "thin skin" treatment. Pathetic.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

In fact @djnicholl is one of the most hypocritical people I have ever seen in action. Look at this. "I won't say anything defamatory but I'm going to call @DrAseemMalhotra [who doesn't sell or push drugs] a snake-oil salesman" I think Nicholl could be in trouble here.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a UK snake oil salesman with a large Twitter following and regular appearances on GB News. Despite complaints to the GMC and Ofcom, no action has been taken. The GMC acknowledged health misinformation but did not contact Ofcom. This viral content is difficult to challenge, highlighting the ineffectiveness of regulators.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have UK snake oil salesman. I'm not gonna say anything here that's inflammatory, but, you may not have heard of him, but, I've seen has over a quarter of a 1000000, followers on Twitter. And, you know, he tweets about awards he's never received. He gives interviews to GB News regularly, okay? And in fact, this particular interview, it's had, what, 2 and a half 1000000 views on Twitter. I complained to the GMC, and I complained to Ofcom. Ofcom did absolutely nothing. The GMC said there was health misinformation. So I just asked the GMC. Well, why don't you contact Ofcom? No. I mean, what is the point in having a regulator? And, you know, this kind of stuff goes viral, and it's very hard to challenge.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

If I was @DrAseemMalhotra I would be contact a good lawyer and file a defamation case. It's a slam dunk. Nicholl has no insight. Most of his talk is on censorship, whilst demanding the silencing every other doctor that disagrees with him, yet quoting Solzhenitsyn

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

If you really want to watch it you can see it here, but I warn you it might make you angry. The hypocrisy is off the scale and uses all the far-left tropes you can think of. https://youtu.be/eE9F4lIdr4I

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Meanwhile, if you have a relative that died of COVID at @SWBHnhs in March to May 2020, I think you have a legitimate case to file a criminal complaint against the hospital executive or @djnicholl. Feel free to reach out and we will help you. #Midazolam #NG163

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Update...

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

The hypocrisy of @djnicholl is relentless He wants the right to speak freely but us also running a hate campaign to remove any doctor speaking out about pharma safety. Wow. https://news.sky.com/story/jacob-rees-mogg-apologises-for-comparing-doctor-to-disgraced-anti-vaxxer-11802903

Jacob Rees-Mogg apologises for comparing doctor to disgraced anti-vaxxer The leader of the Commons is under fire after comparing an NHS consultant to the doctor blamed for a vaccine controversy. news.sky.com
Saved - September 15, 2023 at 4:11 PM

@JanJekielek - Jan Jekielek

"I truly believe that a lot of people died unnecessarily because of that censorship." Dr. @joevaron worked for 715 days straight in the ICU during the pandemic. He was vilified & sent death threats for his use of repurposed drugs. PREMIERE 9PM ET: https://ept.ms/S0915JosephVaron

Video Transcript AI Summary
In my hospital, my patients had a mortality rate of 4.4% while the rest of the country ranged from 25 to 40%. Unfortunately, I faced censorship whenever I mentioned the potential benefits of ivermectin on social media. This censorship, which I refer to as "Facebook jail," prevented me from sharing important information. I strongly believe that many lives were lost unnecessarily due to this censorship. Don't forget to subscribe to our alerts newsletter to stay updated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My patients in my hospital had a mortality of about 4.4% when the rest of the country was in the 25 to 40%. Unfortunately, people like me were censored over and over again. Every time I got put anything that had remotely reward ivermectin on any post that I did, I would go into what I call Facebook jail. I truly believe that a lot of people died unnecessarily because of that censorship that we have. Don't forget to subscribe to our alerts newsletter, and you'll never miss an episode.
[PREMIERING 9PM ET] ‘A Lot of People Died’ Because of Censorship: Joseph Varon, Doctor Who Worked 715 Days Straight in ICU | ATL:NOW Dr. Joseph Varon worked for 715 days straight in the intensive care unit at the United Memorial Medical Center treating many critically ill COVID-19 patients. theepochtimes.com
Saved - October 2, 2023 at 9:40 PM

@PLJinNewWest1 - PLJinNewWest #SaveTheChildren #LetsStand4Kids

The most published cardiologist in the world giving it to us straight. Yet in BC health care workers still in the system require a Fall Booster. They are literally trying to harm them still @Dave_Eby @adriandix @bcpoli We know you know. #CrimesAgainstHumanity

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker challenges three false narratives surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The first narrative suggests that the virus is unbeatable, leading to fear and prolonged lockdowns. The second narrative promotes the idea that vaccines are completely safe and effective. Lastly, the speaker disputes the notion that COVID-19 itself is solely responsible for the current issues, arguing that the vaccines are causing a surge in illnesses. They assert that the medical literature strongly supports this claim, citing the fulfillment of the Bradford Hill criteria for causality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 1st false narrative was that the virus is unassailable, we have to stay in lockdown and be fearful. The 2nd false narrative is take a vaccine, it's safe and effective. The 3rd false narrative now is It's not the vaccine causing these problems, it's COVID. It's COVID that we saw back in 2020 causing all these problems in 2020 Three, don't fall for the false narrative. The medical literature at this point in time is compelling. The Bradford Hill criteria for causality have been fulfilled. The vaccines are causing this enormous wave of illness.
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 3:36 AM

@5dme81 - 5DME81

@PaulMitchell_AB @Compuglobalhyp1 Health Canada is not about health. Its about #CrimesAgainstHumanity with #TrudeauForcedVaccinations and #vaccineDeaths https://t.co/SVw45QOgIH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated and states that it is a personal choice. However, they assert that unvaccinated individuals should not be allowed to travel on planes or trains with vaccinated people, as it poses a risk. They emphasize the need for strong decision-making in this regard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of a government that's gonna continue to say, get vaccinated. And you know what? If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice, but don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk. We need to be strong in the decisions we're taking.
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 3:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Hoffe's evidence of harm prompted @cpsbc_ca to warn physicians against challenging the public health narrative, risking investigation and disciplinary action. #Canada #CovidVaccine #TruthMatters

@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)

Shortly after Dr. Hoffe presented evidence of harm to Dr. Bonnie Henry, @cpsbc_ca issued a notice to all physicians, warning that any doctor challenging the public health narrative would face investigation and potential disciplinary action. #NCI #Canada #Cdnpoli #ThisisCanada #NeitherSafeNorEffective #COVID19 #CovidVaccine #TruthMatters

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares their experience with a vaccine safety specialist who advised them to submit vaccine injury reports. However, when the speaker sent in six reports, public health denied them and claimed there was no evidence of harm. The speaker also mentions that after they wrote a letter to a doctor, the College of Physicians warned doctors not to contradict the public health narrative or they would be investigated and disciplined. This warning has led to doctors staying silent and not questioning the narrative. The speaker submitted 14 vaccine injury reports, but all were denied by public health, who claimed they were coincidences and not vaccine injuries. The speaker concludes that reporting vaccine injuries is impossible as public health censors them to maintain the belief that side effects are rare.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so I should mention to you just the other thing that I think is a really important thing. This vaccine safety specialist told me the only thing she was willing to advise me, was that I needed to submit vaccine injury reports. So initially, the first 6 that I sent in, literally, the public health were putting out notices to our community saying that my allegations that anyone had vaccine injuries were false and that there was no evidence of harm. And 1 month after my letter to doctor Bonnie Henry, the College of Physicians put out a notification to all doctors warning doctors that anyone that contradicted the public health narrative would be investigated and, if necessary, disciplined. This was their response to me revealing the evidence of harm, was to tell doctors that they were not allowed to reveal evidence of harm. You were not allowed to contradict the safe and effective narrative. Otherwise, you would be investigated and disciplined. And so when people wonder why people continue to think that the side of those people that have believed what the media have told us. It's because doctors have been warned that they're not allowed to question the narrative. They're not allowed they're too afraid. They have to feed their family. They don't want to lose their medical license. They don't want to end up like me, under investigation. And so this has helped push the narrative that, well, doctors are seemed to be all on board because they don't say anything. Well, they've been warned not to say anything. So I ultimately submitted 14 vaccine injury reporting forms. And out of those, every single one was denied by public health. Every single one, they would literally phone, they would send a report back to me saying these are not vaccine injuries, these are all coincidences and this person needs their next shot and they would phone up the patient and tell them that this is not from your shot, you need to get your next shot. So I discovered that it was impossible to report the vaccine injuries because they literally get censored by public health so that they can carry on telling everyone that the side effects are incredibly rare.
Saved - November 25, 2023 at 7:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The pharmaceutical industry's silence on allegations regarding the safety and reliability of their Covid vaccine is concerning. They fear legal action that would force them to disclose information about the lockdown and vaccine development. These companies have a history of paying fines for harmful side effects and exploiting Africa for drug testing. Their greed and power grab, supported by billionaire foundations, aim to establish a New World Order. They avoid suing prominent physicians and thinkers, relying instead on captured regulators and governments. Despite their fearmongering campaign, we remain defiant and united against their tyrannical agenda.

@Jay_Naidoo - Jay Naidoo

Do ever wonder why one of the most powerful sectors of the global economy #BigPharma choses not to respond to widespread allegations that their #Covidjab was unsafe, unreliable and cause millions of #vaccineinjuries That thy have not sued anyone for #defamation Because they have to disclose all information on how they arrived at this brutal lockdown and their fake vaccine. They have bring their CEOS and scientists to testify. We will bring the many cases of injury and death that is now mounting. And they have to open all their books, emails and disclose everything. And they will have to face the questioning of many of the most eminent physicians in the world. They are terrified of this. They will use the governments they own and the medical regulators they have compromised to do their dirty work. These pharmaceutical companies have paid billions of US$ already in fines for their disastrous side effects in the past. They have been fingered in the explosive opioid crisis affecting the US and now threatening the whole world. They have used Africa as a testing ground for many of their toxic drugs. I’m fact they are the world largest drug cartel. We can analyse how we allowed this this takeover of our health and well-being that now has compromised so many of our governments, the #WHO, the medical profession, the mainstream media, our universities though their slush funding. It’s pure #greed #powergrab driven by #BigFoundations of the #billionaireclass , the naked emperors of the #WEF to install a #NewWorldOrder that will be the tyranny of technocrats and billionaires with a #GodComplex. So what don’t they sue some of the most eminent physicians and thinkers across the world for #defamation such as @MartinKulldorff @DrJBhattacharya @DrAseemMalhotra our very own @NickHudsonCT @NathiMdladla2 @ProfTimNoakes @ShankaraChetty They are terrified that the immunity given to them by our foolish governments, the fact that we have a #WHO, #medicalprofession and #mainstreammedia and #medicalregulators that #BigPharma has mostly captured is still not enough. They needed to batter the global population first through their campaign of fear, shame and guilt. And they failed inspite of the billions they spent. We have not been defeated. We are not afraid. We will resist any future plans they have to lockdown our world. Let us unite around #truthandcourage to show these anti-human elites we will defy their imposition of their tyrannical #NewWorldOrder. So here. Sue me for this OpEd I wrote https://www.biznews.com/health/2023/05/08/pfizer-naidoo #NoRetreatNoSurrender. 🙏🏾💚💜❤️

Jay Naidoo agonises over Pfizer and its body count Jay Naidoo sets out the criminal track record of Pfizer which sits pretty as we struggle with the falsehood of shame, guilt and vilification. biznews.com
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 3:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Mexico has taken a stand against the WHO, demanding the rejection of amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new Pandemic Treaty. They call for open international debates and public consultations on these proposals, emphasizing the importance of human rights and the need for transparency. Additionally, Mexico urges the explicit prohibition of gain-of-function research. This campaign has been ongoing for three years.

@ShabnamPalesaMo - Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

BREAKING - Mexico stands up to the WHO The letter demands: 1) Reject the amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations. 2) Reject the WHO New Pandemic Treaty. 3) Call for a prior, broad and open international debate on the proposed amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations and the proposed new Pandemic Treaty from a human rights perspective. 4) To carry out a public and informed consultation and debate at the national level on all the implications of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new Pandemic Treaty with the participation of the public, private and social sectors, related to policy issues and public health measures during the health contingency, making previously accessible to the public in a clear, timely and understandable manner the necessary information to make effective their right to participate in the aforementioned public consultation, through appropriate means, written, electronic or otherwise, taking into consideration all available and updated scientific, medical, clinical and legal information. 5) To carry out a public and informed consultation and debate at the national level on all the implications of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new pandemic treaty, as well as their relevance and reasonableness based on the evaluation of achievements, failures, challenges and lessons learned at the national and international level that occurred during the COVID19 crisis. 6) Strictly and explicitly prohibit gain-of-function research aimed at modifying pathogens to make them more transmissible, more contagious, more virulent or, being viruses of other species, able to infect humans. Proud of everyone involved in this campaign for the last 3 years+ #ExitTheWHO #SouthAfrica

Saved - December 7, 2023 at 4:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The summer of 2023 witnessed a concerning rise in sudden deaths among COVID-19 vaccinated men aged 20-29. This article highlights 76 tragic cases, including athletes, university students, and military personnel. Cardiac arrests, dying at home, and dying in sleep were the most common occurrences. Exercise-related activities, particularly running and playing soccer, posed significant risks. Doctors must prioritize heart health through screening, prevention, and treatment to save lives. Unfortunately, the medical community seems preoccupied, and this era is considered one of the darkest in medicine's history.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

NEW ARTICLE: SUMMER OF DIED SUDDENLY - Men ages 20-29: Sudden deaths from June to Oct 2023 - 76 Tragic deaths - What is killing young COVID-19 Vaccinated men? Summer of 2023 was the deadliest summer for COVID-19 Vaccinated people in past 3 years. We now see young Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaxxed men dropping dead every single day and it's no longer unexpected or surprising. Some recent examples: Oct.27, 2023 - Ravenna, OH - 27 year old Police Officer Thomas Wike died suddenly at his home Oct.22, 2023 - Newmarket, UK - 25 year old Dallon Holmes, amateur jockey who worked in racing yards and had ridden in 3 races was found dead in his home Sep.18, 2023 - Trento, Italy - 24 year old motorcycle racer Filippo Momesso was found dead in his home on Sep.18, 2023 A few months ago he graduated computer engineering at Trento University Sep.12, 2023 - 26 year old Sylvester Sackey, professional soccer goalkeeper for Ghana Premier League Club Legon Cities died suddenly Aug.27, 2023 - California - 26 year old runner Sam Norton collapsed on August 27, 2023 while competing in the Santa Rosa Marathon he collapsed at the 23rd mile and died suddenly in the hospital. He was running to qualify for the 2024 Boston Marathon Aug.27, 2023 - Ivaipora, Brazil - 27 year old soccer player, Rafael Rocha, collapsed during a soccer game and died suddenly on August 27, 2023 Aug.22, 2023 - Shelley, ID - 25 year old Karl Saint Christopher Tucker II, former Montana State football player died unexpectedly on Aug.22,2023 following an "unexpected cardiac event" Aug.22, 2023 - Houston, TX - 23 year old Reggie Chaney, former University of Houston Basketball player was found dead in his apartment on Aug.22, 2023. Foul play not suspected. Aug.14, 2023 - 21 year old Rodion Amirov, NHL Hockey Toronto Maple Leafs prospect died on Aug.14, 2023. Diagnosed with a brain tumor in Feb.2022, he was receiving treatment in Munich, Germany where he died Aug.11, 2023 - 21 year old Jason Apreku, Computer science student at Indiana University of Pennsylvania collapsed at 4:30pm while hiking and died on Aug.11, 2023 In my article, these 76 sudden deaths of men ages 20-29 over the past summer represent a small but important sample of what is happening in all highly COVID-19 Vaccinated countries. In this group of 76 sudden deaths there were: 27 athletes (5 soccer, 5 football, 4 cyclists (bike or motor), 3 baseball, 2 horse riders, 2 triathlete/marathoner, 1 hockey, 1 basketball, 1 wrestler, 1 boxer, 1 rugby, 1 personal trainer) 7 university students 5 police and 1 firefighter 4 soldiers or sailors 4 artists 3 doctors or medical students Cause or manner of death where info available: 16 cardiac arrests (at least) 12 died at home 11 died in their sleep 8 died while running or racing (marathon, cycling) 5 died playing soccer or rugby 5 died from Turbo Cancer 4 died from training (military, police) 4 died from infection 4 died at work 2 died on vacation 2 died in their car 2 died from blood clots 1 brain bleed 1 seizure 1 died on the plane 1 died on the street 1 died while having dinner For men ages 20-29, the sudden and unexpected deaths are predominantly cardiac, to a higher degree than I expected. Women ages 20-29 who die suddenly get hit much harder with blood clots and turbo cancers than men 20-29. So overall, what's killing COVID-19 Vaccinated men ages 20-29? Being any kind of athlete (by far), with soccer players, football players and cyclists being at highest risk of sudden death. It's Dec.2023 and this is still the case right now. Being military or first responder (police, firefighter). Especially during training. This is a consequence of illegal and unscientific COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates (anyone involved with vaccine mandates must face criminal charges and life in prison) University students are still dying suddenly. Even if mandates have ended, they're still dying. What is the most typical manner of death? Cardiac arrests, dying at home or dying in their sleep are by far the most common. But there is a large portion of deaths that involve exercise - the deadliest being running, playing soccer, and any king of “training” This is where doctors should be taking steps to save lives. Screening. Prevention. Treatment. This is where most of the unnecessary deaths of young men ages 20-29 are occurring. If we’re going to SAVE any mRNA jabbed men in the 20-29 age group, the focus must be on the HEART. Instead, doctors aren't doing anything to protect their patients. They're too busy "dying suddenly" themselves. This is truly an era of "dark ages" for medicine, probably the darkest in history. Special thanks to: @tulloch1978 @resilient333 @toobaffled @JonelessHomes @vancemurphy Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL into your browser to access. @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra @twc_health #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg

Saved - December 23, 2023 at 6:02 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

We now live in a nation where doctors destroy health https://t.co/aOOLDV4l4i

Video Transcript AI Summary
Most physicians and clinicians avoid getting involved in the issue of profit-driven healthcare. The real problem lies in the collusion between academic institutions, doctors, medical journals, and industry for financial gain. These corporations, as legal entities, often exhibit psychopathic traits, prioritizing profit over the well-being of patients. Many top drug companies have been fined billions for illegal marketing, hiding harm data, and manipulating results. However, these fines are often outweighed by the profits they make from selling the drugs. While the pharmaceutical industry has contributed life-saving treatments, the net effect of their practices is negative, with a significant amount of wasted resources and harmful drugs approved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That you were able to survive this. But for the most part, most physicians, most doctors, most clinicians, they don't wanna get involved in that, And so they toe the line. Speaker 1: Yep. I think you've hit the hit the nail on the head. So let's give it some context here as well. So yes, legal responsibility to provide profit for shareholders, not to give you the best treatment. But the real scandals are the Those with a responsibility, Joe, to scientific integrity, academic institutions, doctors, medical journals, collude with industry for financial gain. And the the or quite often, though and and I know you discussed, you know, in detail around the whole Vioxx scandal with John. But quite often, the way that these big corporations operate as legal entities, they're not pointing fingers at people Within them, you know. I met Pascal Sauteris. Had dinner with him, who's the CEO of AstraZeneca. You know, he even sent me a book, afterwards, you know, to my home address. He knows where I live, so I better be careful. But he seemed like a nice guy. Right? But in their roles, They have they they are only responsible to their shareholders. But the problem is, and we see this historically, It's quite often. And doctor Robert Hare is a forensic psychologist who was behind the original international we call DSM criteria for psychopathy. And he says that as these legal entities quite often in the way they conduct their business actually fulfill the criteria for psychopath. So callous unconcern For the feelings of others, incapacity to experience guilt, deceitfulness, conning others for profit. And we have precedent. We have history of that. You know, between 2003 and 2016, most of the top ten, Most of the top 10 drug companies paid fines totaling about $33,000,000,000 for illegal marketing of drugs, hiding data on harms, and manipulation of results. And, you know, and when those crimes were committed, in most cases, they end up making more profit from sales of the drugs than they do from The fines. The fines. Speaker 0: Like biopsy. Speaker 1: So there's no incentive to stop doing what they're doing. Right. And ultimately, you know, the patients suffer. But I don't wanna throw the baby out with the bathwater here, because someone might say, well, hold on, doctor Malhotra, but aren't the drug industry responsible for all these life saving treatments and blah blah blah? And yes, they are. But the question is, what is the net effect of them? So if you look at, in the last 20 years, so I'll just take give you some examples here. Between 20,021,008, of the 667 drugs approved by the FDA, only 70 75% of them We're found to be copies of old ones. So the drug companies will change a few molecules here and there on an old drug, rebrand it, rename it, patent it, make lots Some money and then they move on and they move on to the next one. Right? So there's huge waste. Only 11% of them were found to be truly innovative, as in a therapeutic clinical benefit Benefit over the previous drugs. So there's all this waste. In France, something similar between 20,021,011, Of almost 1,000 drugs were approved by their regulator. Again, most of them are copies of old ones. But About double the amount of drugs, Joe. 15% of those drugs were approved were found to be more harmful than beneficial compared to about 8% that were therapeutic benefits. So what does that mean when you look at it in its totality with the waste and the harm? The overall net effect of the drug industry, in my view, on society in the last 2 decades Has been a negative one.
Saved - December 28, 2023 at 8:47 PM

@QtheBubbles - Q the Bubbles

Dr. William Bay. Gag order lifted on Doctors in Australia. Let’s see who stands up. https://t.co/Ez6vsCMjxx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Australia's Health Practitioner Regulation Agency has rescinded its gagging order, allowing doctors to speak openly about vaccines and healthcare. The directive, which had been in place for over two and a half years, was overturned on December 11th. Doctor Melissa McCann was the first to break the news. This development means that doctors in Australia are now free to speak confidently without fear of regulatory actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have they backed down? And what does it mean for you and others? Yeah. So great news coming out of, Australia's Health Practitioner Regulation Agency today, otherwise known as the evil clowns opera, but it has broken today the news that they are finally after, more than than 2 and a half years have backed down on their Gaggen order, the 9 March 2021 position statement, and they have rescinded They have stopped it. They have reversed it. They've thrown it in the bin. Thank god. Amen. So, it turns out that that, gagging order was dismantled a few days ago on the 11th December. Doctor Melissa McCann, from Airlie Beach was the first to break the news to me, that They had rescinded and superseded this directive, which is great news because this directive thing, is what was gagging the doctors regarding the of vaccines. In fact, any type of health care from literally speaking the truth. So with this release of the, 9 March 2021 physician statement, it means that doctors, and I encourage them strongly, all doctors in Australia now free to be somebody like me and speak openly and confidently agency now without fear of any regulatory actions. So this is great news for
Saved - March 27, 2024 at 11:29 PM

@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw

ATTENTION ALL DOCTORS - Your days of lying and covering up for your nefarious governments are over. Whip https://t.co/IBkoCP5aym

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors are being blamed by Rishi Sunak for following politicians' instructions regarding medical treatments. He warns doctors to speak out before facing public backlash. Time is running out for them to reveal the truth about the safety of recommended treatments. Sunak's accusations may lead to serious consequences for doctors. It is urged that they act quickly to avoid further scrutiny.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, guys. February 13, 2024, and I listened with interest to the live interview of Rishi Sunak, doing a question time on GB News. And it was very interesting to hear him say that all the politicians did was follow doctor's instructions. So clearly, they're about to hand the doctors their ass on a plate. Now you doctors know what's happened. I've spoke to you in my funeral home, and you've openly admitted, you know, what's happened and you've known for some time. Rishi Sunak has openly declared there who he's gonna blame, who is pointing the finger at. So with this in mind, I suggest that you all think very carefully about right and this wrong. It's not too late to redeem yourself, making a pact between you and coming out openly and telling the truth about what happened and what continues to happen with these poisons, they recommend still as safe and effective. Rishi Sunak's about to throw you on the bonfire, guys, so that you face the public wrath. Doctors facing the public wrath for things they've done that politicians like Rishi Sunak have forced them to do. Doctors, you need to speak out, and the time is short. They're gonna usher the who in shortly, and then it's gonna be too late to say anything. I suggest you use that intellect that you have to process very carefully what's gonna happen in the coming days to doctors. Now Rishi Sunak has openly blamed you for injuries and deaths. You need to speak out, guys. Your window of opportunity is growing smaller and smaller.
Saved - May 15, 2024 at 12:39 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Dr. David E. Martin Calls For Total Destruction Of The World Health Organization (WHO) For Crimes Against Humanity & Bio-Terrorism https://t.co/o0RnMXbEd7

Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) of being a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a four-step process to execute their nefarious plans, including planning exercises, funding, creating rationales, and deploying and profiting from them. The speaker also alleges that the WHO has committed crimes such as genocide, racketeering, and terrorism. They provide examples of unethical practices, including the murder of children in vaccine trials and the manipulation of the COVID-19 pandemic for profit. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and an end to their criminal activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity. And I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words. Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit. Well, I'm going to tell you since its formation in the 1940s, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. And I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation. This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand. And they use a 4 step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do, and then they deploy and profit from it. And in violation of 15 U. S. Code Section 19, which for those of you listening, coincidentally started with the Clayton Act in the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States, 1913, the same year the World Health Organization's progenitors also started. So I find Clayton Act in 19 13 and we set in motion a 110 years ago the criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organization, a 110 years later. And in violation of TFEU or TFEU, I don't know even how to say it, the TFEU, the treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the treaty for the dysfunctional European cabal. Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that this was never a public health anything. It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behavior of a population, period. That's what it was. That's what it always was. And we can come up with every theoretical argument we wanna make about things, but the problem even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something is falsifiable for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance companies paid 30 $1,000,000,000 less in claims. Now if there's a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus cunningly that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements, and whether you're paid up on your premiums, that's a big ask. It turns out that the data is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic. We had genocide, And we need to call it what it is. Next slide. When I say we planned it, let's make sure we understand exactly the not so fine print of the fine print. And I want to call your attention first to the right hand column of the slide. This is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, PATH and the Gates Foundation did on their wonderful worldwide program for malaria vaccine for children under the age of 6 months of age. And in their clinical trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the vaccine group and then cunningly use the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children. Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because it's exactly what it was. Because it turns out that this control group was not a saline injection. It was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing. It was actually a cocktail of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The control group was known to kill people, and the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe gonna kill people. And what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all. And cunningly, under article 5, section 13, which I put on this slide, I want you to understand why I said at its formation in 1947, when the WHO was funded and founded, it was funded and founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language. Section 13 of article 5 ends with the following statement, immunity from personal arrest or detention, blah blah blah, immunity from legal process of every kind. Now if you didn't intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution and its worse, even investigation for prosecution of every kind. People sit there and pretend, well, that's like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity? This is a criminal organization who set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit. And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew it. Because their first director general, none other than doctor Rene Sen, who happened to be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau in 1940 earlier in 1947 mysteriously, with the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation was nominated to become the 1st director general of the WHO. And within 5 short years, Rene Sand decided to authorize the real purpose of the WHO in writing by then director general doctor Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not public health. This is the advancement of the same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie. People stop fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing, but we're not going to the root. This was an organized crime racketeering entity set up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies, and who gets any chance at life. And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers, let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, if I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest of any organization, you might conclude that that risk book that actually aggregates into a controlling interest. And it turns out that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitiveness law in the United States. This is absolutely not only not an independent charitably funded donation, but more importantly, under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, this constitutes directed donations which specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations. When I say this is a crime, I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime, and now the crime of racketeering global terrorism. Next slide. I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it. And why don't we use the criminal's language in their own words? Because it's the best way to say it. When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified chimera associated with the model derived from coronavirus, they actually said the following. To sustain the funding based beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding. There was no health crisis. This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry. That's the crisis. And let's read on. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board of the World Health Organization, and it was the funding base for Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan. So don't tell me that we have to do an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it in their own words. Next slide. And now we get the fun one that no one in congress is willing to address, which is the elephant in the room. On October 21, 2014, despite the multiple conversations between senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci where we've been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes. He has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left. And it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, which unambiguously states that during the gain of function moratorium, which by the way, if we use the word moratorium, feels like that means you're supposed to stop. Why don't we go ahead and look at 2 pieces of this letter? 1st, the second bullet under project 1, which by the way was not part of the original grant. This was to look at the novel functions of the virus pathogenesis in vivo. You know what that means? In living systems. The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models. But this grant was modified with this letter to say we were going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems. And then we love the last paragraph of this letter, which conveniently says, as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary. How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium? And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line or continue to conduct the applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently active budget period. But here comes the problem. You know who is supplying the budget? An indefinite term, unlimited amount contract from DARPA and from NIH. Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out, when you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end. Unless you think that I'm making an allegation, which I'm not, I'm making an accusation. Let's be clear. And there's a big difference. I'm not alleging anything. They actually went to the trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan virus that was gonna get us. As you see on the right hand side of the screen, published in 2016, March 14, 2016, the SARS like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1, and I quote, is poised for human emergence. Does that sound like we're just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little haywire in December of 2019? Or does it feel like we were told, look at Wuhan and look at coronavirus and look at what we've been doing to manipulate coronavirus in Wuhan and in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, And lo and behold, we're going to go ahead and tell you that we're ready to release it in 2016. Next slide. We're almost done. And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed to do that. I happen to be, for the United States government, in the early part of the 2000s and the latter part of the nineties, a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons. I'm acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological warfare agent is in the 18 US code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons. And so my assessment is in fact professional and right. And the reason for that is I'm the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many years. That's why I say it. But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a nut job. Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. So why don't we look at what the criminals said themselves, shall we? In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation, Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into 1,000,000 and billions of people's arms, That Ralph Barrick was sponsored to present the following, and let's go ahead and use his words, presentation. Synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, bio warfare enabling technologies. Does that sound like a public health distribution program? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does biological warfare enabling technologies sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness? It sounds to me like biological warfare enabling technologies. And the reason why I have that hunch is what followed was he received, next to his NIAID grants, noncompetitive DARPA grants in matching funds for over $140,000,000 of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies. So do I have a problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not. Because that's what they called it. And we know that they knew they called it that on September 18, 2019. Because on September 18, 2019, the racketeering, co conspiring cabal of interlocking directorates, also known as the World Health Organization, said that they were going to conduct an expert experience for the world that was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen. The lethality in that statement is the problem. They didn't say we're gonna maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around. They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason, in September 2020, the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universal vaccine. Not we'll look at other options of treatment, not we'll have a look at what might be early intervention as Doctor. McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances. Not that we stated on September 18, 2019, we were intending to kill. And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion, no one would have accepted. And that's published by the Criminal Racketeers. Next slide, and there's only 2 to go if you're following. Deploy and profit from it. We were told investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. And lo and behold, guess what they saw? Profit at the end of the process. 2022, $100,000,000,000 for Pfizer of public funds. Moderna, after lying to the congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID, where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation, they receive a back payment royalty of $400,000,000 for the first payment of the royalty. $400,000,000 More than any Institute of Health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention in the history of American medical research. And lo and behold, what do we receive after that? A request from the World Health Organization to expand its budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it, and guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back. That's what they did. Next and now you get the final slide. This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional crime. This is a criminal act done by a criminal institution established to enable criminal behavior since its foundation in 1947. That is what this is. And we should not be debating the merits of democracy or liberty or anything else as irrational as that would be if we stood at a bank robbery and debated the merits of printing dollar bills. The problem is not the dollar bills. It's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health, and it's not public health, and it's not the suppression of information and the suppression of dissident views and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world and academicians around the world who spoke out against this, that's not the crime. The crime is that we had criminal racketeers who conspired and developed a, quote, emergency, the same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured, and did all agency capture to make sure that you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use, vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition. So we just use them. Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion in violation of both European Union standards and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These were crimes. It was organized crime, and we should treat it as such. Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath, and this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty, and most importantly, the death and destruction of the integrity of well meaning people who sit here today doing everything they can within their power to try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe. I will not for a moment denigrate the multiple contributions of amazing academic and medical professionals who've tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes. But I will, without doubt, say the following. Until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of and murder. Until we have that conversation, we're having the wrong conversation. Because we are not here to debate the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organization. We are here to end the criminal organization itself. This is my call to every single person on this planet. Don't just limit the power of the who. Destroy the who. Thank you very much.
Saved - May 8, 2024 at 6:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
@DrRanj is accused of rewriting history and censoring doctors who warned about the pandemic. The author calls it "horseshit" and accuses him of crimes against humanity. They also criticize him for crying on Instagram and pretending to care about injured families.

@FiveTimesAugust - Five Times August

Every word out of @DrRanj’s mouth here is horseshit. These bad actors are attempting to rewrite history now pretending they didn’t take part in smearing and censoring every doctor who warned us all when it mattered most. Crimes Against Humanity, Ranj. 🖕 https://t.co/LqTfMWFMFr

Video Transcript AI Summary
AstraZeneca admits COVID vaccine concerns have sparked debate on social media, including conspiracy theories. Doctor Ranj faced backlash for promoting vaccines but emphasized the importance of providing accurate information during the evolving pandemic. He explained that early reports of adverse reactions were not conclusive evidence of vaccine-related issues. The focus was on public health and safety amid a global crisis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now then. COVID is back in the news, and it's got lots of people talking with headlines like this. AstraZeneca admits its COVID Now this is going to worry a lot of people, Doctor Ranj. So just bring us up to date. What's going on? Speaker 1: You spoke a lot about the vaccine when it was rolled out and you've had a bit of backlash on it on social media. Yeah, one of the places where there has been a lot of debate around COVID vaccines in general has been on social media. Everyone from scientists through to people who've suffered potentially adverse reactions, right through to the abject conspiracy theorists. This new the news that's just come out has ignited a hell of a lot of discussion and that's come from especially from people who have got conspiracy, maybe anti vax views, who believe now that they were deliberately misled over these vaccines and I've experienced that backlash directly and I said it's been quite distressing but nothing compared to what the families have been through but it has been unfair. As a healthcare professional I worked throughout the COVID pandemic on the front line. I also spoke on screen and online about COVID and about the vaccines especially as they were launching and I can say that our job was to get the best in information and advice out to the public that we could based on what we knew at the time. And and those early stages where we started seeing the reports about those potential, clots and adverse reactions, we didn't, based on all the information we had, there was not enough to say that it was down to the vaccines because those clots happened for lots of other reasons and they weren't happening at a higher rate than we would expect at that time. But we've also got to remember that this was on the background of an unprecedented global and evolving pandemic that was killing millions of people at the time.

@FiveTimesAugust - Five Times August

That was fast. https://t.co/P8y2V3vmFh

@FiveTimesAugust - Five Times August

Crying over on his Instagram about being called out on his BS while pretending to be concerned about the injured families he’s personally responsible for. These people are sick sick criminals. https://t.co/RZJhtzFVD7

Saved - June 13, 2024 at 11:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Anne McCloskey, a courageous woman who spoke out when few did, has been jailed. Twitter banned her and made her delete a tweet, but parts 2 and 3 are still available. It is a disgrace that she is imprisoned, reflecting the state of our world. Please watch and share. #FreeDrAnne

@Demo2020cracy - Anti Lockdown Alliance(GLOBAL)

I cannot believe Dr Anne McCloskey has been jailed. She is an absolute hero and brave lady. She dared to speak out when few did. Below is her in 2021, Twitter banned me and made me delete tweet 1/3, but parts 2 and 3 are below. Please watch and share. This lady shouldn't be jailed. It's an absolute disgrace and shows what kind of world we live in. #FreeDrAnne

@Demo2020cracy - Anti Lockdown Alliance(GLOBAL)

Powerful TRUTH from Dr Anne Mc Closkey 2/3 https://t.co/0az0wB8ZOa

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the pandemic, Ireland's population grew due to inflated COVID cases and fear-mongering by the media and governments. The PCR tests are unreliable, deaths were exaggerated, and basic rights were stripped away. Citizens were subjected to psychological abuse, censorship, and loss of freedoms, including education for children. The true impact of the virus was overshadowed by government control and manipulation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ireland in this pandemic actually increased your population by a couple of percent. If we take away the track and trace system calling for the first time in medical history a case, someone who's perfectly well, who has no symptoms, and which is gonna cost the UK government £37,000,000,000 over 2 years, I don't even know what £37,000,000,000 looks like, what it would what it would buy. Would it be 2 hospitals? Would it be 5 hospitals? Would it be a 1,000 nurses jobs? I have no idea. But these PCR tests measure nothing. They are an illusion to create a crisis. If we take away the fact that the WHO changed the rules, changed the way in which we measure disease impact by saying that any death within 28 days of a positive PCR test was due to COVID. And even without a positive test, if you had symptoms, shortness of breath, fever, the things that people die from every day, that was COVID 2. If we take away the daily, no, hourly, incessant misery porn in the legacy media, dolefully recounting the figures and scrutinizing the anguished last hours of those who were taken, and the pooface politicians with crocodile tears pretend to care. If we take away the psychological abuse of populations across this planet using applied behavioral psychology designed to keep them in terror, if we take away the signage, the arrows, the one way systems, walk, don't walk, the yellow notices on every flat surface, the sanitization, the masks, all the paraphernalia of this neurolinguistic program, and mental abuse which tells us that we are the biohazard. We are a danger to our families and friends. If we take all this away, there is nothing to see. The emperor has no clothes. But, of course, there was something to see, wasn't there? Viruses don't make laws, governments do. But what we did see, what we saw was removal of our most basic and inalienable rights to work, to to move, to associate, to kiss, to hug, to go to church, to bury our dead with dignity, to live our lives as we see fit. We saw the removal of a right to speak, to protest, to object to this tyranny. We saw censorship, character assassination, and banishment of scientists and professors who dared to offer an alternative narrative. We saw our children and young people locked up, deny their education, the right to play outside, to live their precious young lives, however they and their parents saw.
Saved - June 23, 2024 at 11:38 AM

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

German doctor sentenced to over 2 years in jail for issuing mask and COVID shot exemptions The globalist parasites are ramping up their activities and going after those who speak truth. This doctor is a heroine and champion of the people #Freedom https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/german-doctor-sentenced-to-over-2-years-in-jail-for-issuing-mask-and-covid-shot-exemptions/

German doctor sentenced to over 2 years in jail for issuing mask and COVID shot exemptions - LifeSite 67-year-old Dr. Bianca Witzschel was sentenced to two years and eight months in jail, banned for three years from working as a doctor, and fined €47,000 for writing exemptions to COVID shot and mask mandates in Germany. lifesitenews.com
Saved - June 25, 2024 at 6:42 PM

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

VIDEO: WE UNIFY Conference (Reclaiming Canada) - My Keynote Speech Few days ago a Canadian doctor was fined $44,784 for prescribing IVERMECTIN for COVID-19. ENOUGH. Dissolve the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons & start criminal prosecutions @ABDanielleSmith#cdnpoli #ableg https://t.co/sXTN0fVQ6I

Video Transcript AI Summary
Colleges are accused of destroying medical ethics and the patient-doctor relationship. Danielle Smith, running for Premier of Alberta, spoke up for the unvaccinated, calling them persecuted. She suggested dissolving the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta for change. Elect politicians willing to make major changes, not just tinker with healthcare. Support doctors who upheld the Hippocratic oath during the pandemic, as the healthcare system may collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the colleges were the biggest abusers. And I will say again, if there is anywhere where there should be criminal investigations and prosecutions, it should be at the colleges, the leadership of the colleges. Because they've done this to us. They they've basically they've destroyed bodily autonomy. They've destroyed informed consent. They've destroyed every facet of medical ethics, established medical ethics that we've had since World War 2 that we've enjoyed. And they destroyed the patient doctor relationship. Danielle Smith is running to become the Premier of Alberta. And when she was elected as interim premier, in her first day she said, the unvaccinated were the most persecuted group that she's ever seen in her lifetime. And she was correct. She had the guts to say it and she was absolutely 100% correct. And the media crucified her for it, but she said it. She said it publicly. And then the next thing that she has said that no other politician in Canada has ever even thought about, let alone said. She said that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta should be dissolved. She said this. These are the kinds of politicians you need to elect cause we need major changes. The tinkering with, you know, tinkering with the health care system is not going to fix anything. We need major drastic changes and this is the only way is you're going to have to elect people who are willing to do the difficult work. The other way is to support the doctors who stood up for you during the pandemic. And and look in your communities and and and find the doctors who are still faithful to their Hippocratic oath. Because there will come a time where our health care system will crumble and you're going to need them.
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 1:47 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Lawyer outlines criminal charges against the medical establishment. 💥SHARE EVERYWHERE💥 https://t.co/AyP1BPTYnp

Video Transcript AI Summary
A group created a criminal complaint form for individuals to report crimes related to the COVID-19 pandemic, alleging a conspiracy involving influential figures and governments. The complaint lists crimes like genocide and fraud, focusing on the violation of the Nuremberg Code and Agenda 21's goals. The aim is to hold those responsible accountable under universal jurisdiction. Over 12,000 people have downloaded the form, leading to cases in various countries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was formed more or less the same time as the Nuremberg Code for the Nuremberg, trials. And I just want to spend a second on Nuremberg principles. I'm sure you've heard about it a little bit before. It arises from the atrocities of World War II where prisoners were experimented upon amongst other things. That all happened in 1945. And really what it created was the first principles, the first recognized principles of international criminal law. It also provided for death penalties, capital punishment. And 1 of my colleagues had mentioned that in fact some of the doctors that took part in Nuremberg's atrocities were hung, as were people that helped them. So no longer after the Nuremberg Code can you say, yeah. I shot him with a with a vaccine. I was just doing my job. That doesn't work anymore. And just because you come from a country where the death penalty is not allowed also does not count. Our team I'm part of the criminal team, not that we are criminals. We are helping people, regular old folks, take apart. So we recognized some months ago, maybe before that, that people were so frustrated. They just wanted to do something, anything. They didn't have an outlet. So we came up with this idea that we would write a form criminal complaint, make it form law, that anybody and everybody could download and they could use it for themselves. It's really just a foundational document. But it does list a lot of crimes, and rightfully so, going back to the conspiracy theory. As a predicate offense, you can find laws both in international law, meaning UN conventions and international agreements, multilateral agreements that talk about things as war crimes. Can you wage a war by yourself, or do you need somebody else to do that? Again, 2 or more people planning a crime in 1 step in furtherance. Crimes against humanity, that came out of the Nuremberg Convention or code codex, I guess, it's called. Genocide, homicide, attempted homicide, criminal assault, criminal battery, fraud in connection with a major disaster for emergency benefits and racketeering, all of which effectively require not all of them, I should say that most all of them require the predicate offense of conspiracy, that agreement between 2 or more people. So we wrote out this criminal complaint. And with my colleagues who I'll introduce you to in a minute, we came up with, all of those crimes alleged complete with extensive evidence. The story begins some years ago with something called the Good Club, where the ultra elite, extremely wealthy, including Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, sorry for all of you that love Oprah, Warren Buffett, they all got together in New York and they decided that the world is overpopulated. And you would have seen after that Bill Gates up on the stage no different than this 1 saying, yeah, the world's overpopulated. We gotta get that that carbon number down to 0. Well, this is the creation, the foundation of what it is we have today. Certainly, they're not the first, but they are all Eugenesis, and they openly stated that. So along comes then this, biological entity, funny enough, event 201. Has anybody heard about that? So that was the practice run. It happened all of 2 months before we had the bioweapon released. So the, the theory of the case goes something along these lines. Conspirators planned, invented, created a biowarfare weapon in joint collaboration with the Chinese government or some part thereof to purposefully release the COVID weapon, to cause terror, economic hardship, depression, false imprisonment, injury, death to the global population, and psychological warfare, all under this word called a pandemic. We call it plandemic. It required compliciters who used their media apparatus for the purpose of public policy, coercion, travel restrictions, employment restrictions, liberty restrictions, all in furtherance of the criminal enterprise to trick, to coerce, to intimidate, to compel global populations into receiving 1 or more experimental gene therapy shots. I think you all understand that. These are not vaccines. They're not vaccines by definition and certainly they are experimental. Going back to the Nuremberg Code, which is patently illegal to say actually to say nothing at all, right? Informed consent is 1 of the deals that you have to do. How can you have informed consent when the inserts to the package? I don't know if anybody ever seen that. They pull out the the box, the vial comes in and pull out the in the insert. There's nothing on it. How can you have informed consent? How can you understand what is in this experimental shot if there's literally nothing at all printed on the paper? They used the experimental gene therapy shots, in addition, for the delivery of nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles. What is that? You can imagine these are atomic size delivery devices, and they carry around, I guess it's called proteins, viruses, whatever it is, antigens designed to make your body react in a certain way. They use nanoparticles to genetically modify, track, record, provide signals intelligence, programming, and complete control over humanity. In completion of the crime, the criminal enterprise is to tag, track, code, rate, measure, restrict, manipulate, dominate of every person and their rights on this planet. That's the theory of our case. Has anybody ever heard of Agenda 21, the agenda for the 21st century? Again, going back to international law, multilateral convention, it started really 1994 in the Rio Conventions. We're going to save the planet. Save the planet because humans are the cause of all the ills that we have here. Anthropogenic, destruction. So out of that climate accord came again a series of multilateral treaties generally known as Agenda 21 and now Agenda 2, 030. I'm sure you've heard the buzzword, sustainable development. So sustainable development requires, guess what? None of us. We were not sustainable. There are 3 primary missions, agenda 21. 1, the elimination of private property rights. Communism is what that is. 2, the elimination of borders. You can see that there is mass migration around Europe. We have mass migration happening here. That really means loss of sovereignty all in further into this 1 world government that is largely in place as it is right now. Item 3 is a massive reduction in the world's population. That sure sounds like a plan, a criminal 1 in fact. And that's why this is all based on conspiracy. So we, as private citizens, cannot prosecute crimes ourselves exactly. However, for crimes against humanity, there is something called universal jurisdiction. What does that mean? It means the crimes are so heinous, so intolerable to society that anybody has the right to investigate the crime. Anybody has the right to report that crime. And any court, any law enforcement body, any legislature on the planet has the right to pursue that crime. So we're here as lawyers trying to help people. We created this form criminal complaint and people have downloaded it more than 12, 000 times, so I've come to find. Thank you. We have cases going forward, and, as I understand it, South Africa, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and now the Western United States.
Saved - October 5, 2024 at 12:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On October 3, I lost @DrJackieStone, who took her own life after everything she valued was stripped away. This tragic event highlights the consequences of speaking out against The Narrative. I shared an extract from her final interview, reflecting her struggles. I urge everyone to share this widely in her memory, as a reminder of the importance of supporting those who challenge the status quo.

@lisanhenry - lisa henry

On 3 October @DrJackieStone took her own life. Everything she valued and found purpose in was taken from her. If you don’t know by now, this is how it works if you speak up against The Narrative. Here is an extract from her final interview. 🎥Me and @woodybaloo @Honest_Medicine @TheHopeAccord @WCH_Org @ShankaraChetty @drnathimdladla @BizNewsCOM @Jonathan_Witt @SeanBFlanagan @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @PierreKory @PaulineHansonOz @MartinWucher @VirusFighterVi1 @jimmy_dore @mRNAdeaths @HopeRising19 @KLVeritas @ShabnamPalesaMo @MidwesternDoc @SJschmidt963 @bevschafer @MargaretAnnaAl1 @Jikkyleaks @JanJekielek @sonia_elijah @PanData19 @drcole12 @ChildrensHD Share widely in her memory.

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, the person who reported them in Zimbabwe worked for the Wellcome Trust and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The speaker believes forces above governments are at play, influencing doctors who think they are doing the right thing, and that the media is heavily censored, preventing the public from accessing information. The speaker feels that they have been neutered and that medical registrars can now erase doctors for saying or doing the wrong thing. They are not optimistic about finding new regulatory bodies, believing the opposition is too powerful. The speaker anticipates doctors being replaced by AI and patients losing trust in the medical profession. They stated that a combination of silver, Ivermectin, doxycycline, and zinc was effective, and that adding Ivermectin stopped people from dying.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of what happened in Zimbabwe, the person who reported me worked for the Wellcome Trust and was a British doctor or a professor here employed by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. There were a lot of letters written at the time saying that it was people outside of Zimbabwe that were targeting me. And in fact, our government protected me in terms of not ending up in jail. So I would say that the wherever this is being driven from is above governments. It's people who fund governments. And I think that the doctors, many of them, were actually completely captured. I think the doctors thought that they were doing the right thing. Doctors the doctor patient relationship was used to get the public to trust that these things were safe and that they were and that they worked. So and it was a massive machine. I think the people that I'm most concerned about are the media. Mhmm. Nothing gets out. Even the summit was highly censored. So I think that certain names are highly censored. I think that certain words are picked up by AI and censored. And I think the vast majority of the public have no access to this information at all. Speaker 1: Is there anything and just have a moment to think and scroll around your head. Is there anything you want to say that I haven't asked you that you think is important to to say on the record that we can have for all time? Speaker 0: Not really, actually. I don't think. Like I said, I'm in an odd place at the moment. See, you know, when Martin and I spoke about this, it was before he lost his court case in Namibia. And they said he didn't have locust standi standi. And that's what they've done, really. They've taken they've raised us. And it's been so easy. And that, for me, is the most frightening thing. And the recent amendments, the medical access of the medical registrar can erase a doctor from the register. So you can put in decades of training and have decades of knowledge and experience. And if you say or do the wrong thing, you're gone. Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know Speaker 2: if you wanna speak into maybe a solution being another way of finding our own regulatory bodies or, you know, the the sort of bit of the brainstorm stuff from yesterday. If, you know, like what Shankara says, Speaker 0: we need to just it's not Speaker 2: to leave them behind and find a new way. Do we wanna talk about that or do we not want to commit that much time? Speaker 0: The only reason I can't put my heart and soul into it because I don't think it'll work. Speaker 1: This stuff. Right. Okay. Yeah. Speaker 0: What we're up against is too powerful. And I, honestly, I'm such a solution based person. I'll sit and think about solutions until I go purple. And I've been left at the end of this summit, to be honest, with the feeling of it's been wonderful to connect with people that I only connected with on Zoom before. But it's also the reality that we're living in some very difficult to explain times. And I don't know I don't know what to do about it. I actually don't. You know? Are you recording? Yeah. K. Yeah. I don't know Welby in 5 years' time. I was thinking that last night. I really don't know what is going to happen. I think a lot of doctors are gonna be replaced by AI because they follow algorithms. I think a lot of patients have lost trust in the medical profession and looking for alternatives. But it just seems to be a lot of chaos out there. We worked out that if you used silver, Ivermectin, doxycycline, and zinc, you would probably get a response. And the day we added Ivermectin to our patients was the day that people really stopped dying.
Saved - November 9, 2024 at 9:57 AM

@AndrewZywiecMD - Andrew Zywiec, MD (the good doctor)

I've been informed that my friend and colleague Dr. Kirk Moore, @Moore22K, who ALLEGEDLY saved thousands of kids from the COVID poison shot (& standing trial for doing so) has been arrested and placed in jail. This is a travesty, and the NAZI thugs responsible will face justice.

Saved - May 23, 2025 at 11:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I express my frustration with the corrupt ANC that protects criminals, which has led to suffering across our country. In a video series, I recount our terrifying experience fleeing armed men in 2021, with no justice served. Instead, my husband and I, both victims, face relentless persecution from a politically connected group, threatening our lives. For nearly four years, our human rights have been severely violated by a weaponized judiciary and police.

@DeliaByliefeldt - Delia Byliefeldt

Mr. President @realDonaldTrump Corrupt ANC Protects Criminals. Our entire country suffers under this. Video No 4, In a series. We were fleeing armed men in 2021, no one has been brought to book for this. Instead, my husband, a victim in this, just like me, is being relentlessly persecuted and attacked & our lives threatened by this politically connected mob. Our human rights severely infringed upon for almost 4 years by the weaponised judiciary and police services. #arrivingatthepolicestation #HumanRightsViolations #Afrikaner #WeaponisedJudiciary #WeaponisedPolice #ANC #CyrilRamaphosa @FoxNews

Video Transcript AI Summary
Devon and the speaker were at White River Police Station and were chased by black men in vehicles. They were forced off the road and had to drive through traffic. They are now inside Whitehall Police Station because the pursuers have guns. Tippy is with them and is in the parking lot outside. The baron is taking the speaker to check something. There is film of the incident.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Devon, we had Devon, we were at White River Police Station. We got chased. The baron is taking me to check it. We got chased by black men in vehicles off the off the road. We had to chase through traffic. So sorry. We're not in they have guns. We're now inside Whitehall Police Station. Tippy's with us. Tippy's in the parking outside. There's a bunch of the film
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 11:38 PM

@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)

Very true words: “Covid censorship activity killed people.. The reality is that if (free speech) had been truly upheld during covid, it would have saved lives, led to less damage, less destruction and fewer deaths.” — DrJBhattacharya Censorship kills. https://t.co/9hCNkvUubk

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government crossed a bright red line when it suppressed scientific and policy discussions during COVID, treating dissenting voices as akin to those of international terrorists. This suppression is wrong; free speech, allowing debate among scientists, policymakers, and the public, is a fundamental American norm. The government's actions prevented this debate, leading to harmful lockdown policies, vaccine mandates, job losses, prolonged school closures, and economic devastation. This censorship, ironically, cost lives. Contrary to claims that free speech is dangerous during a pandemic, upholding the First Amendment would have saved lives and reduced the damage and destruction we experienced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The line between that and suppressing scientific discussion, suppressing policy discussion is should have been a bright red line that should never have crossed. And the government agencies essentially decided to treat scientific debate on COVID policy as if it were the and the dissidents around who were who were on the other side of the government as if they were just like those international terrorists, in in some sense. They they they they thought it was okay to suppress those kinds of those kinds of people, those kinds of ideas. As an American citizen, I don't think that it's it's right for the American government to have that kind of power. The basic fundamental American norm is free speech. And I understand there are nuances around exactly what that means. Free speech is not the freedom to reach everybody. But at the very heart is allow like, permitting a space for debate to take place among scientists and policymakers and and and concerned members of the public on vital policy issues. The government's decided through its actions that they didn't wanna let that happen during the pandemic. And and and again, as a result, it's it's not about it's really not about me. It's about the the the fact that we would have won this debate about lockdown policy and so many people that were harmed wouldn't have been harmed. These vaccine mandates wouldn't have been in place. People wouldn't have lost their jobs or careers over them. The schools would have opened earlier. The panic mongering would have been been addressed, the anxiety and depression problems we're seeing might have might have been less. And the economic devastation from the lockdown policies would have been might have been avoided, least to some degree. All of these consequences the conclusion I take away from that is that this censorship activity killed people. First amendment ironically, the pandemic, we we heard all these things like we can't have can't have free speech during a pandemic. The the the constitution is not a suicide pact. Ironically, the reality is that the First Amendment would have if it had been had it been actually in place during the pandemic, would have saved lives, would have led to less damage, less destruction, fewer people dead.
Saved - April 19, 2025 at 6:31 PM

@gaye_gallops - ♦️GAYE GALLOPS♦️

♦️🇺🇸♦️🇺🇸♦️🇺🇸♦️🇺🇸♦️ NEVER EVER FORGET THIS! What They Did To Humanity Was Unconscionable! The Dedicated Physicians Spoke Out And Were Ostracized. Digest The Magnitude Of Loss. WE HAD TREATMENT AND ♦️♦️THEY KNEW IT!♦️♦️ https://t.co/1Lxv4fM3Qg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Richard Urso, an ophthalmologist and part of America's Frontline Doctors, became involved early in the pandemic because he realized there was treatment available for the virus. With a background in drug development, including repurposing drugs and developing a patented FDA-approved drug, he found it unbelievable that patients were left to die without treatment. According to Dr. Urso, the virus causes infection, inflammation, blood clots, and breathing problems. He asserts that doctors know how to treat each of these issues. Therefore, the idea that there was no treatment from the beginning was "science fiction." Any physician claiming otherwise is being hypocritical and violating the Hippocratic Oath. He then transitions to discussing testing and PCR.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Simone. I'm doctor Richard Urso, and I'm a board certified ophthalmologist and I'm part of America's Frontline Doctors. And I got involved because early on in this this this pandemic, I realized that we had treatment for this virus. Now my background's in drug development and I've done I've repurposed drugs for for use on the eye, eight different drugs, and I actually developed a drug that's been patented and and made it through the FDA. So I looked carefully at this and I could not believe that we were gonna let patients go without treatment, die, get on ECMO and ventilators. It made no sense right from the very beginning. Anybody who said that this made sense at the very beginning to lock down, it never made sense. It was clear that we had treatment. Now let me explain that. What is this? This is a virus. Right? So we get infection, inflammation, blood clots, and breathing problems. Does any doctor know how to treat inflammation? Every doctor does. Does every doctor treat infections all the time? Does every doctor treat vascular disease and thrombotic episodes? Absolutely. Can we fix breathing problems? Of course we can. Okay. So that's why this whole thing was alive right from the very beginning. Okay. So let me just say that again. Anybody who tells you different, that's science fiction. That's not science. And anybody who tells you different, that's a physician, that's hypocrisy. They're not we're about the Hippocratic Oath, about taking care of patients and making sure we keep them from passing away. Okay? So the next thing I wanna talk to you about is what's going on right now in terms of, this testing and this PCR.
View Full Interactive Feed