TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

xxclusionary
Posted - March 22, 2023 at 12:28 PM
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 1:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: The Influence of ESG on Corporations and Educational Institutions Summary: This article sheds light on the growing influence of gender ideology through ESG initiatives. Hedge funds like Vanguard and Blackrock leverage proxy voting to push companies towards ESG adoption. These funds, backed by retirement funds, hold significant power in shaping corporate policies. ESG scores, determined by specialized agencies, evaluate companies based on various criteria. The government also employs ESG to influence companies and universities through procurement policies, pension funds, and grant funding. This comprehensive overview highlights the hidden impact of ESG on society. Character count: 499 characters.

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

A thread: This thread is one of the MOST IMPORTANT things you can read if you want to understand how gender ideology is spreading through corporations and educational institutions. This will focus on how ESG is responsible for the virulent spread of GI. PLEASE SHARE 1/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

I will first focus on how significant hedge funds like Vanguard and Blackrock are using YOUR retirement funds to strong-arm companies into adopting ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives. I will first outline how proxy voting plays a role in this. 2/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

Proxy voting is when shareholders exercise their right to vote without attending the company's annual general meeting (AGM) or other shareholder meetings in person. Instead, they authorize a proxy, an individual, or an institution, to vote on their behalf. 3/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

Hedge funds invest in various companies by buying shares on their clients' behalves, including retirement funds. They then have the right to vote on corporate matters like electing directors, approving mergers and acquisitions, and deciding on executive compensation. 4/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

These hedge funds are voting on behalf of the people who have been authorized to invest their funds. If you have a pension or retirement fund, your money is being used to further the ESG initiatives these hedge funds want to implement. 5/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

Hedge funds often have their own voting policies and guidelines, which dictate how they decide how to vote on various proposals. These policies include corporate governance, ESG issues, and financial performance. 6/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

The extra voting power they gain from voting on behalf of their clients, even if the clients would never agree to the direction the fund is strong-arming a company into going, allows these funds to have a massive amount of power in dictating corporate policy. 7/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

So what exactly are ESG and ESG scores? ESG is a set of policies that outlay specific parameters that ultimately enable an ESG score to be calculated. ESG scores are numerical ratings assigned to companies based on their performance in various ESG criteria. 8/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

These scores are typically calculated by specialized ESG rating agencies using black box methodologies. ESG scores consider a series of conditions such as: 1. Anti-discrimination policies and hiring, promotion, and compensation decisions. 9/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

2. "Inclusive Healthcare Benefits," including transgender-related care, such as hormone therapy, mental health services, and gender-affirming surgeries. 3. guidelines for preferred names, pronouns, and gender identity.

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

4. gender-neutral language and guidance on maintaining an inclusive workforce. 5. Providing restrooms and changing facilities so employees can access spaces that "align with their gender identity." 6. Offering regular diversity and inclusion training for employees 10/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

7. Employee Resource Groups (ERGs): "Encourage the formation of ERGs to support transgender and gender diverse employees." 8. Supplier Diversity: the diversity of suppliers and partners, including those owned or led by transgender and gender-diverse individuals. 11/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

You get the picture. So what do ESG scores mean? ESGs are meant to be a "guide" for (activist) investors to decide which companies align with their social goals so they can invest in them; in reality, they can be used by the government in a much more pernicious way. 12/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

For example, the U.S. government is a significant purchaser of goods and services. Its procurement policies can influence ESG practices by setting requirements for suppliers, such as environmental sustainability, fair labor practices, or diversity and inclusion. 13/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

Additionally, the gov. operates pension funds for its employees, such as the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) for federal employees and military personnel. These pension funds incorporate ESG factors into their investment strategies like other institutional investors. 14/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

This functionally means that the government can use ESG to financially strongarm companies into adopting these ESG "initiatives" by refusing to invest in them via pensions or contract with them because they aren't "socially conscious enough." 15/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

How does ESG affect universities and colleges? Like the above-mentioned pension plans, many universities have sizable endowments and investment portfolios to support their operations and financial sustainability. /16

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

Universities invest their endowments using ESG scores, much like the above pension plans. Meaning the government is using public taxpayer money to strong-arm these initiatives that are potentially diametrically opposed to the interests of the average taxpayer. 17/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

NOT ONLY THIS, but many university ranking systems have started to include ESG-related criteria as part of their evaluation processes. Rankings like the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings and the UI GreenMetric World University Rankings specifically focus on 18/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

measuring universities' performance in sustainability, social impact, and "responsible governance." A university's "ESG performance" is now DIRECTLY affecting how that university is ranked, meaning actual performance and employment rate are not as pivotal. 19/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

The US government is extorting universities by tying grant funding, NIH grants (amounting to tens of millions of dollars), and other research funding. Agencies such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Energy (DOE), and the 20/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

National Institutes of Health (NIH), PRIORITIZE research areas aligned with ESG principles. Grant applications may require universities to demonstrate their commitment to ESG principles. "Universities with strong ESG track records may have a competitive advantage." 21/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

These scores include measuring whether a university has integrated ESG topics into its curricula and teaching students about "sustainability, ethical business practices, and social responsibility." 22/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

This includes providing scholarships and financial aid to" underrepresented students, hiring diverse faculty and staff, and fostering a supportive campus culture." So this means ESG factors influence a university's ranking and hugely impact grant funding. 23/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

ESG is being used by both huge institutional backers and the government to strongarm companies and universities into implementing their desired social policies, and they're using YOUR money to do it. They don't want you to know. PLEASE SHARE! MOST PEOPLE ARE UNAWARE! 24/

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

To add Biden JUST vetoed a proposal yesterday that would have prevented hedge funds from using pensions and retirements funds to implement company ESG priorities via proxy voting. The government is totally complicit and they want to keep you ignorant. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/03/21/biden-veto-401k-rule-esg-investment-funds.html

Biden used first veto to save a 401(k) investment rule. Here's what it does President Joe Biden vetoed a measure that would have overturned a recent 401(k) investment rule about ESG funds. The rule loosened some Trump-era restrictions. cnbc.com
DecentFiJC
Posted - May 7, 2023 at 4:54 PM
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 7:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Amalgamated Bank, closely tied to Goldman Sachs, funds progressive NGO groups and implements UN banking agendas. Goldman divested 60% of its ownership in 02/2020 but remains a significant shareholder. This sheds light on their interests and connections. It's important to understand this context.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Once you get to this point, it may be easier to take a “top down” view and make the downstream connections that way. World Bank (and its 5 major participating institutions) and their friends over at Goldman, BofA, Morgan Stanley, Amalgamated, etc. That’s the right path, imo.🔥 @DakotaSidwell @ApeAverage

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@ApeAverage @Charles41640764 @DecentFiJC care to drop some knowledge ?

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Amalgamated Bank is a big time UN-operatives bank — they currently fund tons of these lunatic progressive NGO/501c3 activist groups and their operative Twitter accounts. (MeidasTouch; OccupyDemocrats; Color of Change; etc.) Goldman Sachs is VERY closely involved and might’ve actually been Amalgamated’s largest shareholder throughout all of 2019 (6.5%). And this perfectly coincides with Amalgamated’s timeline of being the first bank to the table to accept and implement UN banking agendas — UNPRB. Goldman has since tried to mask the significance of their interests, divesting 60% of their direct ownership of Amalgamated in 02/2020. (They’re still Amalgamated’s 6th largest shareholder today.)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Is it beginning to make sense yet? https://t.co/mtUUbRHEiQ

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

This is why we tolerate these people for now. It’s the only reason. https://t.co/UrnUDqAUi7

caitoz
Posted - July 13, 2023 at 1:10 PM
Saved - July 14, 2023 at 4:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Instant Pot, a durable and beloved electronic pressure cooker, faced bankruptcy due to its own success. Its long-lasting quality meant customers didn't need to buy another one, hindering profit growth. This highlights a flaw in our profit-driven system, where companies must continually grow, often through planned obsolescence. Our civilization's obsession with profit limits innovation, collaboration, and potential solutions to global crises. We must shift from competition-based models to collaborative systems for the common good, as our survival depends on it.

@caitoz - Caitlin Johnstone

I just read a disturbing paragraph in a New Yorker article about the Instant Pot, a popular electronic pressure cooker whose parent company recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy: “So what doomed the Instant Pot? How could something that was so beloved sputter? Is the arc of kitchen goods long but bends toward obsolescence? Business schools may someday make a case study of one of Instant Pot’s vulnerabilities, namely, that it was simply too well made. Once you slapped down your ninety dollars for the Instant Pot Duo 7-in-1, you were set for life: it didn’t break, it didn’t wear out, and the company hasn’t introduced major innovations that make you want to level up. As a customer, you were one-and-done, which might make you a happy customer, but is hell on profit-and-growth performance metrics.” Just think about that for a second. Under our current systems for profit generation, which is the primary driver of human behavior on this planet, making a quality product that lasts a long time instead of quickly going obsolete or turning into landfill will actually drive you into bankruptcy. An article in The Atlantic about the bankruptcy filing similarly illustrated this point last month: “From the point of view of the consumer, this makes the Instant Pot a dream product: It does what it says, and it doesn’t cost you much or any additional money after that first purchase. It doesn’t appear to have any planned obsolescence built into it, which would prompt you to replace it at a regular clip. But from the point of view of owners and investors trying to maximize value, that makes the Instant Pot a problem. A company can’t just tootle along in perpetuity, debuting new products according to the actual pace of its good ideas, and otherwise manufacturing and selling a few versions of a durable, beloved device and its accessories, updated every few years with new features. A company needs to grow.” This just says such dysmal things about why our planet is facing the existential crises it’s now facing. Corporations will die if they don’t continually grow, and they can’t grow without things like inbuilt planned obsolescence or continued additional purchases, which in a sane society would just be regarded as shoddy craftsmanship. Our entire civilization is driven by the pursuit of profit, and to keep turning large profits your corporation needs to continually grow, and your corporation can’t continually grow unless you’re manufacturing a crappy product that needs to be continually replaced or supplemented, and you can’t manufacture those replacements and supplementations without harvesting them from the flesh of a dying world. As writer Robert Moor recently observed on Twitter, “The fact that Instant Pot is already being framed as a corporate cautionary tale — the company that went bankrupt because they made a product so durable and versatile that its customers had little need to buy another one — instead of as a critique of capitalism is deeply, deeply depressing.” It’s really heartbreaking to think about all the ways human potential is being starved and constricted by these ridiculous limitations we’ve placed on the way we operate as a collective. Resources being allocated based on how well they can turn a profit stymies technological innovation, because the most profitable model will always lose out to less profitable ones that are more beneficial to people and our environment. Someone could invent a free energy machine that lasts forever and costs next to nothing, and even though it would save the world you can be certain it would never see the light of day under our current systems, because it couldn’t yield huge and continuous profits and it would destroy many current means of profit generation. Science should be the most collaborative endeavor in the world; every scientist on earth should be collaborating and communicating. Instead, because of our competition-based models, it’s the exact opposite: scientific exploration is divided up into innovators competing against other innovators, corporations competing against other corporations, nations competing against other nations. If we could see how much we are losing to these competition-based models, how much innovation is going unrealized, how much human thriving is being sacrificed, how we’re losing almost all of our brainpower potential to these models, we’d fall to our knees and scream with rage. If science had been a fully collaborative worldwide hive mind endeavor instead of divided and turned against itself for profit and military power, our civilization would be unimaginably more advanced than it is. This is doubtless. We gave up paradise to make a few bastards rich. Our competition-based, profit-motivated systems limit scientific innovation, and they also greatly limit the scope of solutions we can avail ourselves of. There’s a whole vast spectrum of potential solutions to the troubles we face as a species, and we’re limiting ourselves to a very small, very inferior fraction of it. By limiting solutions to ones that are profitable, we’re omitting any which involve using less, consuming less, leaving resources in the ground, and leaving nature the hell alone. We’re also shrinking the incentive to cure sicknesses and eliminate problems rather than offer expensive, ongoing treatments and services for them. Or even a project as fundamental to our survival as getting all the pollution out of our oceans. The profit motive offers no solution to this problem because there’s no way to make a surplus of money from doing so, and in fact it would be very costly. So the pollution stays in our seas, year after year. People have come up with plenty of solutions for removing pollution from the sea, but they never get rolled out at the necessary scale because there’s no way to make it profitable. And people would come up with far more solutions if they knew those solutions could be implemented. How many times have you had an awesome idea and gotten all excited about it, only to do the math and figure out that it’s unfeasible because wouldn’t be profitable? This is a very common experience, and it’s happening to ideas for potential solutions to our problems every day. The profit motive system assumes the ecocidal premise of infinite growth on a finite world. Without that, the entire system collapses. So there are no solutions which involve not growing, manufacturing less, consuming less, not artificially driving up demand with advertising, etc. It’s hard to appreciate the significance of this artificial limitation when you’re inside it and lived your whole life under its rules. It’s like if we were only allowed to make things out of wood; if our whole civilization banned the entire spectrum of non-woodcraft innovation. Sure such a civilization would get very good at making wooden things, and would probably have some woodcrafting innovations that our civilization doesn’t have. But it would also be greatly developmentally stunted. That’s how badly we’re handicapping ourselves with the profit motive model from the pursuit of viable solutions. And some solutions would be really great right now. This planet just had its warmest week in recorded history, and Antarctic sea ice is now failing to form in what for the southern hemisphere is the dead of winter. Even if you still want to pretend global warming isn’t real, this planet’s biosphere is giving us plenty of other signs of looming collapse, including plummeting insect populations, a loss of two-thirds of Earth’s wildlife over the last 50 years, ecosystems dying off, forests disappearing, soil becoming rapidly less fertile, mass extinctions, and oceans gasping for oxygen and becoming lifeless deserts while continents of plastic form in their waters. So our need for immediate solutions to our environmental crisis is not seriously debatable. But we’re not getting solutions, we’re getting a world ruled by corporations whose leaders are required to place growth above all other other concerns, even concerns about whether the future will contain an ecosystem which corporations can exist in or a human species for them to sell goods and services to. Corporations function as giant, world-eating sociopaths, because our current models let their leaders and lawyers wash their hands of all the consequences of the damage their monsters inflict in the name of growth and the duty to maximize shareholder profits. People worry about the world getting destroyed by machines driven by a heartless artificial intelligence, but we might end up destroying it with a kind of artificial mind we invented long before microchips: the corporation. So much of humanity’s dysfunction can be explained by the fact that corporations (A) pretty much run the world and (B) are required to act like sociopaths by placing profit above all other concerns. As long as human behavior remains driven by profit, ecocide will continue, because ecocide is profitable. As long as human behavior remains driven by profit, wars will continue, because war is profitable. As long as human behavior remains driven by profit, exploitation will continue, because exploitation is profitable. As long as human behavior remains driven by profit, corruption will continue, because corruption is profitable. There is no “good” model in which human behavior can remain driven by profit without these destructive behaviors continuing, because so many kinds of destructive behavior will always necessarily be profitable. No proponents of any iteration of capitalism have ever been able to provide any satisfactory answers to this. The call then is to move from competition-based, profit-driven systems to systems which are based on collaboration toward the common good of all. We’re a long way off from that, but a long way can be cleared in a short time under the right conditions. Our species is at adapt-or-die time, and the adaptation that must be made is clear.

WallStreetSilv
Posted - August 13, 2023 at 2:52 AM
Saved - August 13, 2023 at 11:03 PM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

Does Blackrock Run The World? 88% of public companies have their largest shareholder as one of three entities.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The majority of companies on the S&P 500 have State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard as their largest shareholders. BlackRock, with a worth of $10 trillion, is only surpassed by the GDPs of the US and China. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern is also evident in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially hold a monopoly. Their control is so significant that they can remove boards and replace CEOs. However, they argue that having a 50% market share does not violate monopoly laws.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 8% of the companies on S&P 500. The largest shareholder is either State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard. 88% of them. Well, how big is BlackRock? $10,000,000,000,000. How big is $10,000,000,000,000? Only 2 countries Have a bigger GDP than what BlackRock has. US and China, that's how big BlackRock is. And then you see their influence in defense contracts. If you Google top shareholders of Raytheon, BlackRock, Vanguard. K. Let's go look at Hollywood. Same thing you see there. Let's go look at pharmaceutical, and you're like, wait a minute. These guys essentially have a monopoly. A billionaire to these guys is nothing. They got the kind of control that make companies fire boards. They can replace CEOs. They can replace leaders if they don't like, But they say 50% is a monopoly law. That is already a
BernieSpofforth
Posted - August 13, 2023 at 6:11 AM
Saved - August 13, 2023 at 10:02 PM

@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets

STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM- Where governments are controlled by large corporations. Unelected, unaccountable and unstoppable. Shaping society without bothering to ask you.

Video Transcript AI Summary
State Street, BlackRock, and Vanguard are the largest shareholders in 88% of companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone is worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern repeats in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially have a monopoly. They have immense control, being able to fire boards and replace CEOs. This raises concerns about monopoly laws, as even a 50% market share is considered a monopoly.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 88% of the companies on S&P 500, the largest shareholder is either State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard. 88% of them. Well, how big is BlackRock? $10,000,000,000,000. How big is $10,000,000,000,000? Only 2 countries have a bigger GDP than what BlackRock has. US and China. That's how big BlackRock is. And then you See their influence in defense contracts. If you Google top shareholders of Raytheon, BlackRock, Vanguard. Okay. Let's go look at Hollywood. Same thing you see there. Let's go look at pharmaceutical. And you're like, wait a minute. These guys essentially have a monopoly. A billionaire to these guys is nothing. They got the kind of control that make companies fire boards. They can replace CEOs. They can replace leaders if they don't like. But they say 50% is a monopoly law. That is already a monopoly.
WallStreetSilv
Posted - September 5, 2023 at 9:26 AM
Saved - September 5, 2023 at 6:11 PM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

They don't want you to know this. RFK explains how BlackRock, State-street and Vanguard own a huge portion of the S&P 500 companies They are also purchasing large numbers of homes in the USA. RFK Jr claims that by 2030 they could own 60% of the single family homes in America.  

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three major corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other, essentially forming one giant corporation. They also own 89% of the S&P 500 and have now set their sights on buying every single family home in America. If they continue on this path, they will own 60% of all single-family homes in the country by 2030. The CEO of BlackRock, Larry Fink, is on the board of the World Economic Forum, which promotes the idea of owning nothing and being happy. These corporations often outbid individuals looking to buy homes, using LLCs with ambiguous names that can be traced back to BlackRock.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: More importantly, there's 3 giant corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, which own collectively, they own each other, so it's really 1 giant corporation, but they also own 89% of the S&P 500. They own everything. They've now decided to to buy every single family home in America. So if they stay on the current trajectory, they will own 60% of the homes in this country, single family homes by 2,030. They literally are trying to buy everything and the head of it, Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is on the board of World Economic Forum and they've said, we want this great said, which is you will own nothing and you will be happy. Well, they're on their way to making sure that we don't own anything. So you all probably have heard of people who are about to buy a home, and somebody comes in with at the last minute with a cash cash or offer and and statuses off the out of the market. Right. And it's usually an LLC with an ambiguous name. But if you trace that up, you'll find it's owned by BlackRock. Wow.
Inversionism
Posted - September 12, 2023 at 4:59 PM
Saved - September 13, 2023 at 4:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Moyers, a journalist, shadowed David Rockefeller in the 80s, revealing the lifestyle and influence of wealthy banking families. The power they wield behind the scenes, brokering deals between nations, is astonishing. Leaders grovel before Rockefeller, fearing and respecting him more than their own people. This exposes the insignificance of our votes compared to their ability to shape nations with a mere handshake or stroke of a pen. Real power lies in the hands of these financial elites.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

"The World of David Rockefeller" By Bill Moyers Back in the 80s, Bill Moyers (journalist who is apart of the Rockefeller population council where the Jaffe memo came from btw) followed around David Rockefeller to spend some time with him and to document his daily life and ask questions to both him, and those he interacted with. It's really insightful to see how these very wealthy banking families live, how they interact with leaders of other states, and how real power is brokered between nations behind the scenes. Watching heads of state come out of a meeting with him and start groveling to Bill Moyers about how great Rockefeller is, and how he is the hidden master of foreign affairs, really tells you everything you need to know. Leaders of countries fear and respect Rockefeller more than their own people. That should tell you everything. By the end you will understand how real power is garnered and wielded, and how your vote is utterly meaningless in comparison to these financial powers. With a handshake and flick of their pen, they can topple a nation, start a war, build a new nation, or worse.

Video Transcript AI Summary
David Rockefeller, Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, travels to various countries to meet with influential figures in finance and politics. He attends meetings in Yugoslavia for the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, where discussions revolve around economic growth, inflation, and political instability. Despite criticism of his dealings with authoritarian governments, Rockefeller believes in maintaining relationships with diverse nations. He also addresses concerns about the financial stability of countries like Nicaragua and Italy. Throughout his journey, Rockefeller demonstrates the power and influence of the banking elite, as he navigates through social functions and private meetings to further his business interests.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Bill Moyers. This past summer, Jimmy Carter asked David Rockefeller to become Secretary of the Treasury. Rockefeller declined the 3rd time he has turned down an invitation to join the President's cabinet. When I heard about it, I wondered, what is it that David Rockefeller finds more interesting than the highest Council of Government, so I put the question to him at a meeting and he answered my job. His job has been for 33 years with the Chase Manhattan Bank. Approaching the age of 65, he last month relinquished the duties of Chief Executive Officer, but will remain as Chairman of the bank until 1981. Show me why you find your job so interesting, I said. The result is the film you're about to see. We filmed it in October before David Rockefeller played a role in bringing the Shah of drawn to this country and before the hostages were seized in Tehran. When I pressed him this week to talk on camera about events that occurred after our trip ended, He declined. Until the hostages are released, said Rockefeller, he will add nothing to an earlier press statement acknowledging that he urged our government to allow the Shaw entry because the deposed ruler was a friend and was ill. Critics point out that Iran under the Shaw was a good customer of the Chase Bank and have also been charges in Iran and Europe that the bank helped to channel funds to the Shah's personal accounts, charges David Rockefeller demonly denies. I'm not myself much of a conspiracy monger. The way the world of international money lending works, especially where power, wealth and contacts converge, makes conspiracy redundant, but I'm getting ahead of my story. There are many documentaries to be done on the Rockefellers, on international banks and multinational companies and and on the power of the financial elite of the world, this is merely one approach. Producer David Grubin and I seek simply to render the experience through 1 week of how the world's best known capitalist goes about the job of being a banker and a Rockefeller. In a few minutes, that Gulfstream 2 will be airborne, Heading for Switzerland, Yugoslavia, France, Italy, and Germany. David Rockefeller, the youngest of the Rockefeller brothers, The chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank and the unelected and indisputable chairman of the American establishment is going calling. Rockefeller is one of the most powerful, influential, and richest men in America. And in the next week, he'll be calling upon some of the world's leading economic and political figures. Hello, David. Glad to see you. You ready Speaker 1: to take this journey? All set Speaker 0: to go. Absolutely. We're getting the better of the deal here. Speaker 1: You got my phone Speaker 2: translated, yes. Speaker 0: It's too early in the morning to know about it. Speaker 3: This trip is beginning very ominous. It's hardly it's hardly an auspicious beginning for a trip to eight cities in 7 days, but, here we are ready to take all. The world of power operates behind closed Except when it's pushing a broken down Oldsmobile. You'll never be sure what you can see on a trip like this What you learn, but I'll be alone listening, trying to interpret, hoping to understand something of the world of David Rockefeller, a world of money Speaker 0: Just about everyone knows the name Rockefeller. It's part of the language, a name synonymous with great wealth. And the way in which David Rockefeller's grandfather accumulated his vast fortune is a legend of the capitalist system. But there are other wealthy men in the world wealthier even than Rockefeller. He represents something measured beyond money. He represents power. Rockefeller's own personal fortune is enormous, but his base is the Chase Manhattan Bank, assets over $65,000,000,000. Rockefeller owns more of its stock than anyone else, and the bank in turn controls large blocks of stock in dozens of companies here and abroad. Yet the source of his power is something more. Rockefeller sits at the hub of a vast network of financiers, industrialists, and politicians whose reach in circles that glow. He will see many of those people this week. We're heading for visits with Chase clients and branches in Europe And for the World Bank and International Monetary Fund meetings in Yugoslavia. Traveling with us are senior chase officers And Rockefeller's own chief of staff, Joseph Reed. How many miles do you think you all have logged on this Speaker 4: I would think well over a1000000 that I have personally. If this point is, I've been around the world 5 times in the past, and, literally all the way around and and have been on There's extensive trips where it didn't go around, but it went farther than this. Sometimes, Speaker 0: think, well, I'm David Rockefeller, and I can get the world to come to me instead of going out to see the world. Speaker 4: It's a good deal more fun to go and see the Isn't that great? Well, I certainly am related to hearing. Well, we missed you very much. Well, you you would have added to it and I wish you could be with us. We had a marvelous dinner with king Hussein yeah. And he he asked about you and was very sorry you couldn't be there, which We told him what had happened, but he was in good form. He has another friend who wants to talk to you. Just a minute. He was a grandson of Ted. Grandson of Ted. Yeah. Grandson. Speaker 0: You said you had dinner Speaker 4: This week with King Hussein. Well, King Hussein, I've known for a long time, and he came out to the and had dinner with us on Monday. And it was a very nice occasion. We had a number of people like Henry Kissinger and Bill Spratt and Others whom we've known for a long time, and I was particularly glad we did it. And as much as I think mistakenly, the president didn't see him. Why do you think he did it? Well, I think, apparently, he was afraid that this would upset president negotiations. My own feeling is he has to be a part of them and not talking to him isn't the way to resolve the problem. And Speaker 0: What do you hope David Rockefeller can accomplish for you this week on this trip? At this meeting, there will be hundreds, if not several thousands, of people that all want to have views were the key players, the the decision makers in the international monetary arena. And David gets to see these people, and not everyone will. That's what we get out of this. And also, We ourselves can then build our own little niche. I'm going to be here in 3 weeks. Can I come see you? And when we get there, we do get this we piggyback on this introductory back of David. Speaker 5: Airlink his flight 105, Shannon to New York, now boarding This Speaker 0: It's $27. It's about Speaker 4: about a third what Speaker 6: Well, this would be just $27 for the wine. Speaker 7: And that would be Speaker 4: Well, it could well be some decline. Speaker 0: I know that inflation has arrived from the Rockefeller shops Before a bargain. It's also Speaker 4: very good. Speaker 0: Of the low cost and Speaker 6: the The low cost. What else is what what else is good here? Speaker 4: Well, the other things are are walls. Speaker 0: They seem warm too, which we may need in weather changes. Speaker 4: All right. Right for the Present moment. Speaker 0: I still think Speaker 6: that that armed with 1 Speaker 0: of these, either one of us could take on Moynihan in that region. Speaker 7: That's right. Speaker 4: Oh, that's better than the other. Yes. No. You would look well in that. I think I'm gonna go and get these. I come to you, Need 4 pairs of socks. Hello. How are you? Speaker 7: I'll make that final. Good. He's up to a very warm house. Speaker 4: That's good. That's what I need in Belgrade, maybe colder. So How much will that do we take? Speaker 7: $13.50, sir, please. All right. Speaker 0: We'll just save a $2 over what you would have had to pay in Speaker 4: We might as well get aboard, I guess. Please don't tell me what these are. Well, these books represent The end result of 35 years of having met a lot of people and keeping record for the people that I've met, I suppose I must have 40, 50,000 names in this file. And then when I go on a trip, I get, my office to put together a book with all the people that I've met in a particular country. This happens to be Germany. Before you get to a Speaker 0: country, you'll you'll lease through it to remind yourself? Speaker 4: Often do. It really does make a lot of difference if somebody that you've met 10, 15 years ago casually, you have a way of Saying, well, I remember the last time we met was in such and such a place. They are pleased, and it's helpful to me in in having a better understanding who they are and what their background was. Speaker 0: Every year, US News and World Report He surveys 1500 American leaders and asked them to name the most powerful men in America and every year, you're in the top 10 of the most powerful people in the United States. Are you conscious of exercising power? Speaker 4: Not really. The the only way that it Seems to me, I'm aware of the fact that I am more fortunate than many years Because people have this perception, I think probably when I pick up the telephone and call somebody, They are a little bit more apt to answer you than they might be if they never heard my name. Speaker 0: The first leg of the trip is almost over. We're about to land in Strasbourg, France. It's taken us 8 hours so far with 2 stops in Newfoundland and Ireland, And David Rockefeller has worked most of that time. He took a lunch break, then it was back to the briefcase. It's a pace his grandfather and John Calvin would admire. Strasbourg, France, our 2nd day. Rockefeller likes his pleasures too. This is the only rest stop in the week. He will tour a museum, look at some paintings, Visit a medieval town and dine in a 3 star restaurant. Speaker 2: Well, I started off with president Eisenhower and then, Speaker 0: Early on the 1st morning, I talked with Rockefeller's old friend, Ridgeway Knight, who now works for the Chase Bank. What do you do now for David, Rockefeller and the Chase? Speaker 2: Well, I have 2 jobs, Lady, I represent David personally, and I'm, adviser to senior management on political trends and major economic trends. And I've chosen to keep that part Speaker 0: of the world that I know Speaker 2: a little about, which means fundamentally Europe and the Levant Speaker 0: Ridgeway Knight planned the day's schedule in France. He's a retired ambassador and a former assistant secretary of state. Would it be fair to Classify you as David Rockefeller's minister without portfolio. Speaker 2: I would be terribly frank. If that were true, I would Speaker 1: be very happy. Speaker 4: So what are some Speaker 0: of the, you say you're his personal representative. Are the some of the things you do? You take diplomatic trips for him? Speaker 2: Well, for example, I went out to, well, I went out to Indochina to Vietnam. Speaker 4: I Speaker 0: went and saw that for him. And Speaker 2: when he can't do it himself, I draw less attention than he does. Speaker 0: It's amazing to me that in his world, the bank operates as like a country does. Well, what impresses me most is I've represented a number of presidents Speaker 2: and I've spoken for a number of secretaries of state, But I've never seen doors open more easily than when I say Speaker 0: I'm coming for David Rockefeller. Speaker 4: It's fantastic. His name is Mr. Evelyn, he is the brother of Jean Paul Leberlin, who is a chef himself. He's the mayor of the steel community, his finest restaurant. He is the owner And one of the best investments, 3 styles of restaurants and probably the best among the best. Well, this was done by Mateus Greenberg And as you can see, a Speaker 0: very great realist who's doing these same How long does it take you to organize a trip like this? Speaker 1: Well, we started the day that It was announced by the joint secretariat of the Bank and Fund, to have a planning meeting that very day. Speaker 0: How long Speaker 7: ago was that? Speaker 0: Exactly a year ago. When David Rockefeller walks in public, are you worried? Yes. Speaker 1: Always, always that there could be the assassin, that there could be the attempt of kidnapping, And we've taken a very common sense approach to that for more than a decade, Speaker 0: which is if anybody really wants security, Anybody who really wants to attempt the Speaker 1: grabbing of it, they're probably gonna be successful no matter how much security that we have Unless he's in an armored car, and carried like a head of state from one place to another under a cordon of human beings in which that's not what he wants to do. And so He opted, having consultation with mister von Furret more than a decade ago, to lead a life that had common sense approach to protections And therefore, allows us to be able to discreetly have people who you don't even see here in the square watching it, sir, having a day. Speaker 4: But, you know, it's even if each one is different, so much the better. Speaker 2: This is a soup. You want the bottom one as well? Speaker 4: Yes. If we can get a dozen of each, Well, those things are pretty. They're reproductions of old Strasbourg plates. Speaker 0: It's about $30. Speaker 4: It's quite a lot on the other hand. You know, I mean, these days, we get to get a good play game. Oh. A much less pretty one Speaker 8: You don't understand the value of the dollar. It's so low. Lunch in the restaurant, it was $36. Speaker 3: In that little place? Speaker 8: In that little place. 30 and I'm sure it's a very fine restaurant, but $36. Speaker 4: I mean, that's a lot of money for lunch. Speaker 0: You're a banker. Explain to me what happened to the Speaker 8: I really can't explain. I think in the purchasing parity part of the dollar, I don't understand because in New York, you can literally buy twice what you can buy here for Same dollar and that's of course why there's the business of the Fifth Avenue stores with the tourists is so terrific in the United States. It's cheap, Inexpensive. Speaker 4: He walked out to me Speaker 0: and said, it's just incredible what's happened The dollar, he said a meal in there is $36. He said, I just don't understand. And I said, Speaker 4: if you don't understand what's happened to the Speaker 0: dollar, then it was all, then I'm really scared that you're a banker. Speaker 4: Obviously, the the principal The reason is inflation. I just hope that despite the fact it's an election year, the president We'll continue to take the strong fiscal and monetary measures that I think are essential in order to control it. Up to now, I believe he has. I think it remains to be seen whether that will continue. Speaker 0: Last night at the hotel, I took out a couple of dollars for tips, and I could see the disappointment on the face of the the bell man because the dollar, When I was here 20 years ago, that was that was very Speaker 4: and that's what they wanted. Yes. Speaker 0: The last night, he didn't want dollars. He wanted francs. Speaker 2: This is an extraordinary curiosity because usually, the Muscat Great, gives David, are the luscious, sweet, vulgar wine. And this grown in the alsatian climate Gives this light, fragrant, distinguished aristocratic one. Aristocratic. Don't think so? Speaker 0: As far as I can tell. Speaker 2: Well, yesterday, when I passed by here, Our friend said my next distinguished customer is going Speaker 0: to be the Queen of Denmark. Speaker 2: Here? Yes. And I said, well, you know, Mr. Rockefeller isn't crowned yet. He said, yes, but his crown is much more solid than the others. And he told me about this recipe, which It was a grandmother's recipe of him Speaker 3: and they resurrected the recipe when the Queen of England came. Speaker 0: David and I were talking on the bus, Ridgeway, about the impact of inflation on our society and you wonder what inflation is going to do. That's a terrible question to ask when you look at this beautiful. Speaker 4: It makes me feel that we should enjoy this meeting, don't believe, because we may not have it again. Well, that was an experience, wouldn't you say? Speaker 0: I was just noticing in this copy September's issue of Euromoney that you've helped, make a loan to the independent state of Papua New Guinea. You're been involved in a loan for the Metropolitan Waterworks Authority of the Kingdom of Thailand, and that gets us into the subject the debt in the world. What would happen if these poor countries fail to pay back their loans? Speaker 4: Well, obviously, if this happened in a general sense, it would be very serious for the world banking community. I don't personally think that's likely. We saw that happen with the the bond moratorium after World War one. I think the circumstances are quite different this time. Speaker 0: But does a headline like this in today's New York Times Scare you, Nicaraguan aid says junta will repudiate against the Somoza era. Is there a chance that we'll be seeing a lot of headlines like that? Speaker 4: Obviously, it's not a headline that bankers like read. And if it were a general problem, it would be serious. My guess is that even in the case of Nicaragua, they're going to find that they need the international banking community. And if they ever want to use it again, they're not just gonna be They would cancel all their prior debt and start it from scratch as though nothing had happened. So that I wonder Whether in the long run, that will be their final reaction. Speaker 0: Do you still consider yourself a good friend of the Speaker 4: Yes. I do. I had great respect for him. Good friend, No. Because I really didn't know him that well. I saw him probably 12 times over period of 20 years, we probably had 6 or 8 fairly lengthy one On one discussions of world events, which I found intensively interesting, I think that he was one of the most The best informed people about world events that I've almost ever met. Speaker 0: How do you account for the fact that Someone who could be that well informed about what's going on in the world, as you said, could be so out of touch with what was happening in his own country. I guess in retrospect, Speaker 4: he lost touch with his people. And And I suppose one of the dangers of of powers has so often been said is that the more of it that you have, the more tendency You have to want to hear what you want to hear rather than be have people around you who are telling you what they really think. And I think increasingly, the people who advised him hesitated to Tell him the truth. Speaker 0: Someone said to me just the other day, well, did it ever occur to David Rockefeller when he was seeing the Shah They say, look. You're being accused of running a a police state. You're being accused of using torture. You're bringing down public opinion In your head, you really need to change policy. Did that ever occur to you? Well, Speaker 4: I never did it. I really didn't feel it was my place. I I talked to him As a banker, as an acquaintance who felt warmly toward him, I doubt very much whether this kind of statement coming from me would have been Helpful. I think it it probably would have meant that the next time I wanted to see him, he wouldn't have been available. And I really don't think that was my proper role. Furthermore, while he was accused of all of these things, I had no personal evidence that it that they were correct. Speaker 0: None of your intelligence politically or commercially said as such. Speaker 4: I read it in the in the press. Obviously, it was a police state. One certainly had to assume that there were things going on that I wouldn't have been happy with, but then in all honesty, there are things going on in most countries of the world, including our own, that I'm not very happy with. And if one only associates with people that one feels are absolutely pure, absolutely moral in every sense. I'm also afraid wouldn't one wouldn't have as many friends as one would like. Speaker 0: Belgrade Yugoslavia, the end of our 1st full day in Europe. Crowds gather outside the Hotel Yugoslavia As the world's financial leaders arrive in Mercedes in evening dress for the World Bank's official reception. You're reminded of a Hollywood movie opening, but the power these people represent is the real thing. Speaker 4: See what happens. If you Move with authority and like when Speaker 1: we went through the barrier and I flipped over to chase the party. Yes. That was Mark. Speaker 4: Well, my goodness. Doctor. Nesbitt, how are you? Speaker 5: Nice to see you. Speaker 4: So good to see you again. Joseph. It's a wonderful reunion. Speaker 5: And if you can get it signed Well, frankly, Speaker 4: if we can, we may not stay. We'll see you tomorrow. Scorch you to the chairman when he was waiting to meet you. Okay. Wonderful. Thanks. Just make excuse. I do. I do. How are you, sir? Nice to see you. Good evening, mister. Speaker 3: He was specifically asked to meet you. Speaker 4: Wonderful. I appreciate it. Alright. Thank you very much. Speaker 0: The most important people in the world of international finance are gathered right here in this room, ministers of finance, secretaries Treasuries, governors of central banks, and everybody is here for the same purpose, money. They've come from almost all the countries of the world to make the contacts that make the deal, to seek loans, leg room, And when all the social festivities are over, to have some very serious discussions about some very important property. Speaker 4: We just arrived Speaker 0: David Rockefeller's 1st evening in Yugoslavia set the style and pace for the rest of our He checked in at the Saba Center where the International Monetary Fund World Bank meetings were being held, Met with the governor of the Central Bank of Japan and then visited with some high United States government officials. Secretary of the treasury William Miller. Misrepresentation tell the American people that inflation be could be cured at 6 months or one It's a 5, 6, 7, 8 year program. And chairman of the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker. Volcker is a former Chase officer. Speaker 4: But that just means there's less for somebody else because the total pie has declined. Speaker 0: Rockefeller finished the evening near midnight with a dinner for the most important bankers from Italy. Speaker 6: This is the way a Speaker 0: Rockefeller does business at luncheons, dinners, and receptions gracefully and vivially, and above all, privately. The day that began with breakfast in Strasbourg, France and included lunch in a 3 star restaurant Was finally drawing to a close. Belgrade is the site for this year's World Bank and International Monetary Fund meetings. Yugoslavia is a non aligned country But it's still part of the communist world. This is the first time these meetings will be held in a communist state. 6,000 of the people who make the International Monetary System work have come for the opening sessions. Most of the important business was done in the halls and lobbies where bankers and government officials talked about the slowdown in economic growth, Worldwide inflation, turbulence in the exchange market, and political instability. The rich world has the money. The poor world is looking for it on terms it can afford. There's always a debate at these gatherings over the growing gap between the haves and the have nots. Inevitably, it focuses Speaker 7: on the bankers. Speaker 0: President Tito addresses the opening session. Speaker 5: The the world economy is facing The serious difficulties, the economic growth is slowing down. Speaker 0: The US delegates are worried about the dollar. Its value is falling, they're trying to convince everyone here that Washington will take stern measures to check its decline. The Arabs too are worried about the dollar. They hold 70,000,000,000 of them. And as the dollar continues to slide, many Arabs are switching to gold. The developing countries are worried. They can barely make ends meet. They owe nearly $180,000,000,000 to the World Bank, the IMF, and commercial banks, And they claim that many of the conditions imposed by the lenders make them poorer still. The head of the World Bank is worried about all these matters And especially about the economies of the extremely poor countries. Speaker 4: You were in for the president's speech. Yes. I certainly was. Delighted to hear. Speaker 0: Yugoslavia is looking to refinance $1,000,000,000 in debt. The Chase was the 1st bank to extend credit Speaker 7: to the Bank Speaker 0: of Yugoslavia after Tito's break with Stalin. And now Tito will be looking to Rockefeller once again. David Rockefeller is the only private citizen seeing president Tito this morning, and we're waiting here to see if we can get in to see David Rockefeller seeing president Tito. Speaker 4: I don't know if you recall, Mr. President, but you were kind enough to receive me and my wife. No, thank you. In Brioni, in 1973 and I'm glad to see you still working in excellent health. Right. The world needs you and I think you have demonstrated that even more at these recent meetings in Havana where he played a very important role. Speaker 0: The media event was over. The real business began, And the press was exceeded. While Peter and Rockefeller talked finance, we spoke with Murray Steiger of The Los Angeles Times. Speaker 9: The name Rockefeller, of course, has an international cache about it. It's a magic name around the world. My own Particular experience with him was in Moscow. I was working in Moscow as a correspondent when Chase Manhattan opened the 1st American office. Mr. Rockefeller came in and they rented space for the bank and in their typical fashion, they arranged a mammoth cocktail party. They took over the dining room, the Metropole Hotel, which is an old landmark in Moscow, put on the greatest threat anyone ever saw in their lives. Soviet officials lined up half an hour early for the cocktail party. No one in America could believe anything like this, but here they people were standing out from the street I have not heard of him waiting to come in, shake hands with mister Rockefeller, and enjoy his spread and welcome him to Moscow. What was ironic, for those of us who lived there was that within the week before, the official Soviet press had been denouncing the Rockefellers by name for their investments in Chile and Peru and, Latin America in general. We refer to, David Rockefeller's brother, Nelson, Especially as being one of those of the Rockefellers who were financial imperialists in the third world, Latin America specifically. This kind of contradiction doesn't bother the Soviets. They probably hadn't even read the article or if they read it, they didn't pay attention and may not have This charming, capitalist banker standing there in the Metropole Hotel. Speaker 0: Yugoslavia, Where we are today is a communist country, although none aligned. How do you deal one day with the communist government and the next day with this country. What's the difference in your approach? Speaker 4: Well, I have to say that having been in this business now for 33 years, I To find, one has to be very pragmatic and flexible about these things and that relations with governments, regardless of The political label that's attached to them depends to a large extent on people and human relationships. And just because a country is technically called communist, doesn't mean that A capitalist institution such as the Chase Bank can deal with them on a mutually beneficial basis. And indeed, we do deal with most of the so called communist countries of the world On a basis that has worked out very well, I think, for both of us. Speaker 0: You don't hesitate to call yourself a capitalist. Speaker 4: Not at all. And certainly, they don't hesitate to call me 1, but that doesn't seem to interfere with their Being quite willing to have having dealings with me, even though I'm sure that they feel just as strongly about What I stand for is I do about what they do. Do you ever have any qualms about dealing with an authoritarian, even repressive government? I assume that you're thinking in moral qualms as to whether it's right for me to be dealing with people with very different Yes. I certainly am sometimes uncomfortable And very uncomfortable with the things that I see, but I think that when one Becomes an international banker, one really has to cross the bridge as to whether you feel that it's the role of the international banker To try to persuade other nations and people to handle their affairs in a manner that is politically or economically more to our liking. And I guess that we come to the conclusion that Even if we thought it would be desirable to do that, our chances of doing so are not very good. I personally don't see anything immoral or improper with our dealing with people with very diverse views, Even if they conduct their affairs in a way that we might even find quite repugnant. Speaker 0: Chase is big night. The Chairman is entertaining. Clients from all over the world are here, and David Rockefeller has a word for each of them. Speaker 4: Thank you very much for all that to your speech. I do expect that you are somewhat, more optimistic than mister Burns. My speech planned. Speaker 0: Perhaps, Speaker 4: oh, no. That's not nice. I saw it. This is just for a drink. Yeah. Come on, David. Speaker 0: Is Mr. Rockefeller an important name in Africa? Yes. Speaker 3: Minister, what do you talk Speaker 0: to him about When you are being very candid in a private session. Speaker 10: We have lot of things to see. We have we have to to to talk about Reflection on of politics on our own, mutual affairs. Speaker 0: Does it does it their view that he is also considered a friend by the Israelis? No. Speaker 10: No. That means I am completely full. And if so, I would be completely full. That means I demand That everyone who's supposed to be a friend of mine should be an enemy of others. No? It might be good that he's a friend with me on his friend with me. He might bring a a sort of equilibrium on one day. Speaker 4: I think that we'll get a chance to look at chat. There are a lot of things to There are a lot of things in the church. See if we did. Thank you. You've Speaker 0: attended a lot Speaker 4: of meetings. Speaker 3: Yes. What's going on? Well, this is where the real business of the meetings gets going on. There's very little or really nothing I think in substance that we decided at the actual meetings of the IMF. This is where people who are, voices on the telephone to each other the rest of the year meet and Get a real sense of themselves as a group, I think. They get a feeling of what their political position is and they reaffirm, Well, I'm feeling that they're part of the real global elite, which is after all what they are. Speaker 0: How would you define that elite? No, No, thank you. Speaker 3: I'd say that these people, rather the financial system as a whole and these people Well, run it. Place the limits, in effect, on what any sovereign nation can do. It's only so far outside of the policies that are systemically sound. In other that your banks will buy. It's only so far you can go. And these are the people who set the limits. And this is where they get a sense, I think, a sense of, of What their position really should be and what their politics are and how they feel about each other, Speaker 0: how they arrive at that. Speaker 3: But also, they're doing These guys are selling laws and they, that's really what David is in the business doing, like any banker. And, the, the, representatives Countries here are buying and that's what it is. It's like a market. It's like those bazaars in downtown Belgrade except that food is better here. They're really happy. Speaker 0: What really happens here is At these big meetings, and this is where you've been doing a Speaker 1: lot of your filming. Speaker 0: Everybody comes and it's here where they say, hey, how about meeting me down the corner And we'll talk for about 15 minutes because you're not going to do transactional business with a cash of 1,000. Speaker 2: So everyone comes to these receptions, But everyone's got a little game plan. Who do they want to see? Who do they want to Speaker 0: get into the corner? Then they get into the corner. There's been business done here. I've done business. You You haven't seen too much of me since we got off the airplane. Speaker 4: Sir, Rockefeller, do you think the Americans Speaker 0: are trying to talk the dollar up this week, the level where it shouldn't Speaker 4: No, I don't think so. I think that ever since November of last year I was willing to support it. I was willing to take measures to support it. These measures were very successful, but I don't think for a minute The American government is artificially trying to push the dollar. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Speaker 0: The party's over, and some party it was. Over a 1000 guests lined up to shake David Rockefeller's hand. On the plane the other day, I asked David Rockefeller, what is power? And he didn't give me a very a very good answer. He said he really didn't know. Well, The answer was here tonight. Those handshakes say it all. They're the gestures that shape the nation's destiny. Speaker 4: Hey, Adrian. Was that Adrian, man? Speaker 0: Where its people will live, what they will eat, what buildings get built, what dams completed, Thank you. What jobs created? Who gets rich and who doesn't? In a world where money talks, this is the language in which it speaks. Speaker 4: Good evening. Very nice to see you. Speaker 0: And this his power. David Rockefeller has begun his day with breakfast with the Minister of Finance in Saudi Arabia, one of the most important men in in that country and one of the most important men in the world because of his control of 1,000,000,000 of dollars of investment. He's next door having Breakfast this morning with the Minister of Finance of Saudi Arabia. How did you go about deciding what to serve for breakfast? Speaker 5: Well, especially because it's a we take in consideration if they have any restriction, could Like if he's a Muslim, he would want pork, things like that. Or we try to find out if he has any dietary Reference. So instead of bacon and eggs, they are having eggs only, just in case. And regular breakfast, they didn't want anything to elaborate because it's We are going to talk about very important matters. You know, I think we're not concentrating on the food railing. Speaker 0: Leah Fernandez is a Chase vice president from New York. She's in charge of the elegant social functions, which are David Rockefeller's way of doing business. How many people will you be responsible for this week? How many guests will David have for lunch, dinner, breakfast? Speaker 5: I'd say altogether including the reception Last night, he's a little more than 2,000, I would say. Speaker 4: That's amazing. 2,000 people in 4 days. Speaker 5: Well, yes, that's an accomplishment. Speaker 0: One of the questions that interest me is how David does go through a long day such yesterday with a breakfast, a lunch, a reception, and then a dinner after that reception. Yes. Speaker 5: He is Special I don't know if he has a special personality or special health or what, but he is Unbelievable. He can be out of a plane and into a party, go to meetings And he can go like that for days days weeks months. His practice is life is like that. Speaker 1: Mr. Minister, Mr. Moyers, good Speaker 0: to see you again. What did you talk about with Mr. Rockefeller? How long have you known him? Speaker 4: I think, 15, 15 years. So David Rockefeller is more Speaker 0: than just a banker. He's a long time friend of your country. Some people think that banks today are Larger and more important than countries because they operate across geographical and political boundaries and that they've become the new force in the world? Speaker 4: Yes, yes. In fact, many of them had sort of invisible minister of foreign Invisible minister, part of it. Yes, and thanks. Yes, you can, you can notice that this one. In his There we are, sir. Yes. Speaker 0: Another morning and another breakfast. This time, the Israelis. Yesterday morning, it was the Saudis. Speaker 6: The Israelis have a lot to talk Speaker 0: about with David Rockefeller. Inflation is running at a rate of 100% in their country, and it could get worse next year. Are we paying you a good enough We're not allowed to film in there. It's a private session talking about business and, I assume politics. Of course, we've learned this week that in the world of David Rockefeller, it's hard to tell where business ends and politics begins. Speaker 7: No, it's always interesting to hear it, to hear your view. And I mentioned it, I mentioned it thousands of times, Well, Speaker 4: I remember that. I believed you know, I I Speaker 7: you could be at that time. I started to argue in Israel for this. Speaker 4: It's awfully high. You see, the the terrible problem for them is they have to import all of their oil. And now with Iran out of the sewers, they are having to buy some a third from Mexico, And the other series on the spot market. Speaker 0: On to Rome? Speaker 4: On to Rome. I better go and get my bag. Look out there. You can See the Adriatic Sea and all of the beautiful islands along the Dalmatian coast. Speaker 0: Have you ever sailed down there? Speaker 4: When I was studying at the London School of Economics, My Easter vacation in 1938, I took a a little Italian boat And for $25 for 5 days, I and 4 friends took this. We had the entire 4 public quarters of the vote, and we went down the Dal still stopping it at all affords. I thought that Speaker 0: was a pretty good deal. Coming over 4 days ago, I showed you the headline in The New York Times, which, seemed Seem to be sounding an alarm as to whether or not Nicaragua could repay its loans. Have you learned anything at Belgrade in Talking to all of your associates and others that, have changed your opinion about that, Speaker 4: well, it turns out that that statement was made by one member of the new government ruling group, that In point of fact, our bank has been having continuing conversations with the government They have indicated full intention of paying their indebtedness certainly to the commercial banking system. They have problems. It may be necessary to stretch out some of their debt, but they recognize, as I Said, I thought they would have to when we discussed it before. They have recognized that they Are going to have to pay the debt if they ever expect to get more credit in the future. So on the one hand, our own relations have been Stronger than I realized when I talked with you before, but more than that, he had a most interesting lunch with the Mexican delegation to the World Bank monetary partner. And they've been having a lot of conversations with the new government in Nicaragua, which is very anxious to the help and advice of the Mexican authorities who are extremely good in this field And they're sending people down to help them solve these problems. Speaker 0: And the Mexicans briefed you on this. Speaker 4: They briefed us on it. And as a result, I feel a great deal more confident about Nicaragua than the morning when you showed me that particular rather alarming article. That's another paradox of Speaker 0: the world that this new left leaning regime in Nicaragua has ties with The epitome of the capitalist system. Speaker 4: Well, that's not the first time. Speaker 7: The schedule for today is as follows. We'll get in and check-in at the hotel probably or spending on time, go straight on to The Erie lunch. Now, Erie is the Italian holding company and it is an enormous organization. It owns banks, It owns Alfa Romeo. It owns, Speaker 4: Alfa Romeo, the automobile company. That's right. It owns Alitalia, the airline. It And owns, Speaker 0: you know, Speaker 7: an enormous it also owns, I may say, the Italian Speaker 4: television companies. Economic management of Italy since the end of World War 2 is one of the very impressive things. I guess, as Speaker 8: you know, the the facade of Changing governments is always in the newspaper, sort of colors things. But as you know, if you know the place underneath, it's managed very well. They have. And many of the problems they have are because they have taken an agricultural country, what, 35 years ago and turned it into one of the industrial powers of the world, And that has caused the usual social tensions that go on. Speaker 4: And in 30 years, there have only been 3 up to now governors of the bank of of Whereas there have been, prime ministers, sometimes more than 1 more than 1 Speaker 0: a year. But Just 5 years ago when I was in Italy the last time, all the stories were of the the verge of bankruptcy. Speaker 4: That's true. They've gone through a very difficult period at that time when they had allowed temporarily inflation to quite out of Speaker 0: control. And I remember very well, Speaker 4: we had lunch in Rome with governor Carly, who was then governor of the Bank of Italy and Perhaps the most respected central banker in Europe at that time, and he said, this is really going to The very difficult thing for us to do, we cannot turn the economy around without outside help. We've got to get Temporary loans, and he said, you have helped us often in the past, and we really need you now. And so during the course of the next few months, we and other banks Loan how much, Frank? A $1,000,000,000 at least to Italy to help them with their balance of payments deficit. And a lot of people felt this was a very foolish thing to do. We had so much confidence in governor Carley and his ability to handle things that we were not worried about it. Very importantly, not Forget that it's people. It's a people business. You have Speaker 8: to know the people whom you're dealing with and be correct about it. Speaker 4: Yes. I think that In the case of, Italy, for example, if someone other than governor Carly had been in charge of the Bank of Italy, someone that was less that was less trusted around the world and within the country, We would have hesitated very much in doing what we did. Speaker 0: Gary, how long have you worked for David Rockefeller? Speaker 6: Almost 24 years now. I started in 1955. Speaker 0: And your responsibility is? Security Speaker 6: of the entire corporation throughout the world. Speaker 0: What were you doing before you joined Chase? Speaker 6: I was an FBI agent for almost 20 years. Speaker 0: Is there a lot of intimacy expressed against the Chase Bank? Speaker 6: Absolutely. Why? Well, I think for several reasons. First of all, We're perceived to be by many people as as the establishment. We certainly are perceived to be a David Rockefeller bank. Not only that, but there's the implication that we are the oil bank as well by reason of the the history of the family. It it extends over to when Nelson was alive as an example. Very often, there's a there's a, They get some of these fellows on the outside get get the principles mixed up. They're they're angry at Nelson, so we have to get a letter directed to David or some Information we hear direct that is directed at David. So in many ways, we are a target bank, and David is a target individual. He's a Speaker 0: high visibility person. High visibility, it is. And if embodying the establishment makes David Rockefeller and his bank targets for critics even of threats against this person, It is also what makes him attractive to the tribal chieftains of finance and politics all over the world. We saw it in Rome. In a mere few hours, David Rockefeller meets privately with the president of Italy. This is briefed by the American ambassador. And between off the record sessions with former Prime Minister, Andreotti, and the most powerful figures in Italian finance, He calls on clients at the Vatican, mighty financial power in its own right. He's invited and welcome, cameras are not. Speaker 4: I told you it's forbidden Here, without the permission. Speaker 0: It's as good a time and certainly as good a place as any to reflect on Thoughts that have been growing in the 4 days of this journey. We're now halfway through the trip. And the thought is that If men like David Rockefeller move beyond religious, political, cultural, national boundaries is with with great ease. And here in Saint Peter's Square, the heart of the Roman Catholic faith, there's something very symbolic to me about that. The church has always transcended national, political, and cultural lines. And so in its own way, does the universal church of money. It goes where it will, and the laws of no single nation can regulate it. It even has its own curio. You've seen some of them this week. They've been drinking together, eating together, toasting one another, talking with one another about the mysteries of their faith. And if they don't have a single pope, although some people think David Rockefeller is, he certainly is one of his chief cardinals. Well, what's on the mind of Italian maker? Speaker 4: Well, Mr. Sete, in addition to owning the 3 largest banks in Italy owns 12% of the gross national products of Italy. Speaker 0: That's enough. Speaker 4: And we were just hearing their gross Figures of sales are 24,000,000,000 lira, 34,000 per year. That's a lot. Speaker 0: You should be borrowing money from him. Speaker 3: It's very remarkable Quantity, but it's very remarkable, also number of problems. Speaker 0: Breakfast in Rome, lunch in Milan, dinner in Geneva with Swiss Bankers. Many of them charter members of the Rockefeller network. David Rockefeller may be ever the gracious guest or host, but his chief of staff runs a tight ship. The large staff that absorbed some minor irritations of travel knows that one slight slip and it's back to the teller's window.
WallStreetSilv
Posted - September 16, 2023 at 7:52 PM
Saved - September 17, 2023 at 3:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The ownership of major news networks like CNBC, FOX, and CNN lies with Vanguard and BlackRock. Similarly, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Moderna have common shareholders. These entities vote together on crucial decisions, including board appointments.

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

"If you look at who owns CNBC, who owns FOX, and who owns CNN, At the top of the shareholder list, you have Vanguard and BlackRock" "Then you look at the manufacturers : Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Moderna. Who are the top shareholders of those companies?" And they all vote their shares together on critical matters such as who is on the board of directors.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker points out that major media outlets like CNBC, Fox, and CNN are owned by Vanguard and BlackRock, who are also the top shareholders of Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Moderna. They mention that Vanguard and BlackRock are also the top shareholders of flight companies and junk food manufacturers. The speaker suggests that this control extends to social media platforms like Meta, Snapchat, Twitter, and Google, which they claim are pushing the same narrative as the media. They emphasize that these companies are profit-driven.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You look at who owns CNBC, who owns Fox, who owns CNN. At the top of the shareholder list, you have Vanguard and BlackRock. Then you look at the manufacturers of the jabs. Mhmm. Okay. Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Moderna. We're the top shareholders Of those companies, Vanguard and BlackRock. Now you look at the flight companies that banned all flights. No flights unless you're taken care of. Who are the top shareholders? Vanguard. BlackRock. You look at the food. Okay. Who are the top shareholders of all this junk food? Vanguard and BlackRock. So the media is controlled. The food is controlled. The narrative is controlled. The transportation is controlled. Who owns Meta? Who owns Snapchat? Who owns Well, used to be, but still kinda does Twitter, who owns, Google. They're pushing the same narrative the media's pushing. Oh, it's the same company as BlackRock. It's Vanguard. Profit driven
KuwlShow
Posted - October 3, 2023 at 6:47 PM
Saved - October 3, 2023 at 8:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The foreign owners of the Federal Reserve Bank and the BAR Association aim to maintain their control over the world. They fear the disruptive power of XRP, the most technologically advanced invention in history. They finance politicians, media, academia, and industry leaders to control the narrative. We must follow the money and not be deceived by their words. They will try to take XRP away from us, as they see us as mere serfs with no rights. It's time to wake up, reclaim our government, and restore our original Republic. Otherwise, we'll remain tax slaves on our own land. It's a choice between self-government or a slave state. Let's find our courage and protect our XRP.

@KuwlShow - Rob Cunningham | KUWL.show

The foreign Owner/Operators of USA, INC, the Federal Reserve Bank and the BAR (British Accreditation Registry) Association have ZERO intention of allowing the most technologically disruptive invention in history, #XRP, to unseat their monopoly of power, money, “justice” and authoritarian control over the world. “All the world’s a stage” and NGO bankers liberally finance politicians, media, academia, entertainment and industry “leaders” to keep the illusion of our Constitutional Republic “a thing.” It’s ALL a stage act. It’s ALL about controlling the narrative. Watch what they DO, not what they SAY. How? Follow the money. It stands to perfect reason they will attempt to dislodge the ownership of #XRP from the prisoner’s hands. Indentured serfs have no actual rights in their eyes. If 91 “felony” indictments and 400 years of prison time for one person isn’t enough prima-facia evidence that NGO Bankers have ZERO interest in the will of the American majority, we’re missing the obvious point. It’s their system, their money, their land, their “justice”, their values, their politicians, their corporations and their priorities. Got it? Unless & until we snap out of our delusion of having a true government, we get involved to reclaim our original Republic, and we restore our Founder’s covenant with God and one another, we’ll remain tax slaves held hostage on OUR homeland. We live in a Time for Choosing. Self-government or Slave-state. We find our courage or kiss our XRP, goodbye. @X @elonmusk #BRICS #Gold @realDonaldTrump @Ripple @SECGov @digitalassetbuy @jvallee2000 #XRPArmy @Linqto @Coinbase @WSJ @NYT

@jvallee2000 - Jimmy Vallee

@CsInvesting91 @ValhilCapital Hard to know for sure. But - this could be tantamount to a taking by the govt/banking system. This has been our concern since the lawsuit was filed and the conflicts/corruption at the @SECGov began to surface.

WallStreetApes
Posted - December 20, 2023 at 2:00 AM
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 2:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There has been a global revolution led by billionaires, gradually overthrowing existing systems of authority and becoming the supreme rulers. Key victories include the creation of economic systems like Bretton Woods, IMF, World Bank, WTO, free trade agreements, banking deregulation, Citizens United, and laws allowing unrestricted corporate political donations. The European Union and the eurozone are also significant triumphs. Countries taking loans from international development banks and implementing recommended reforms are considered victories. This revolution aims to undermine state sovereignty and political authority. It is important to understand and anticipate upcoming events to resist and thwart their power consolidation. We can organize and adopt strategies to turn these events in our favor.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is an EXCELLENT Listen, What Has Taken Place for the First Time in History is a “Billionaires Revolution” This Breaks Down Exactly, Step By Step, How World Governments Fell To The 1% and “The enactment of laws for unrestricted corporate political donations” “Well, there's basically been like a worldwide billionaires revolution going on for the past several years or for decades, really. They've taken a very methodical, gradual approach, but overall, a constant advancement that has broken down nearly all resistance. And step by step, uh, they have overthrown the former systems of authority that we have always known in the world, governance as we've always known it, and they've installed themselves, as the supreme rulers over the US, over Europe, and over the developing world, their revolution, the billionaires revolution has progressed, as I said, through stages, and it's possible to identify, uh, many of the key victories that helped them achieve, uh, what they've achieved and enabled them to reach the point at which they are today. Things like the creation of the Bretton Woods economic system, the creation of the IMF and the World Bank and the,, WTO, things like NAFTA, and other free trade agreements, the deregulation of banking, The Citizens United, uh, decision by the Supreme Court. The enactment of laws, uh, for unrestricted corporate political donations. Even the creation of the European Union and the creation of the eurozone, all of these things are significant triumphs in the global coup by the 1%. And within specific countries, you can also identify, Uh, important victories that they've achieved as well. I mean, anytime a country takes a loan from the IMF or the World Bank or any other international so called development bank. Uh, and then they begin to implement the macroeconomic reforms that are always recommended or demanded, stipulated, uh, in the loan agreements. Are victories for the 1%. That's victories for this billionaires revolution. You know? Like in in Egypt, for example, the loan that they took And then the law that they imposed banning third party opposition to investor activity, the cutting of food subsidies, food and fuel subsidies in Egypt and in other countries that have succumbed to the IMF. All of these represent successes for the a revolution of the 1%. I think it's vital for us to understand that, uh, what is happening is a revolution against state sovereignty and political authority. And at this project of the 1%, if you wanna call it that, the owners and controllers of global financialized capital, this project moves forward By means of key events, it's not something that's inevitable. It's not some sort of natural disaster that cannot be anticipated, uh, resisted or thwarted. Certain things have happened which have allowed it to triumph, and certain things are still being pursued, And we can do something about those things. We can anticipate those things. We can respond to those things preemptively. We have to recognize this so that we can identify any upcoming events or plans, uh, steps that they're going to wanna take, uh, that will consolidate their power and compound our subjugation. Once we identify these things, then we can organize ourselves and adopt a strategy that will turn those events in our favor because they are turning points. They will either be victories for them or victories for us depending on what we do about it.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a global revolution led by billionaires, gradually overthrowing existing systems of authority and establishing themselves as supreme rulers. Their victories include the creation of economic systems like Bretton Woods, the IMF, and the World Bank, as well as free trade agreements, banking deregulation, and unrestricted corporate political donations. The European Union and the eurozone are also part of their triumphs. Within countries, taking loans from international development banks and implementing recommended reforms are seen as victories for the billionaires. This revolution aims to undermine state sovereignty and political authority. It is crucial to understand and anticipate their actions in order to resist and turn events in our favor.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, there's basically been like a worldwide billionaires revolution going on for the past several years, the decades really. They've taken a very methodical, gradual approach, but overall, a constant advancement that has broken down nearly all resistance and step by step, they have overthrown The former systems of authority that we have always known in the world, governance as we've always known it, and they've installed themselves, as the supreme rulers over the US, over Europe, and over the developing world, their revolution, the billionaires revolution, has progressed, as I said, through stages. And it's possible to identify, many of the key victories that help them achieve, what they've achieved and enabled them to reach the point at which they are today. You know, things like the creation of the Bretton Woods economic system, the creation of the IMF and the World Bank and the, WTO, things like NAFTA, and other free trade agreements, the deregulation of banking, The Citizens United, decision by the Supreme Court, the enactment of laws, for unrestricted corporate political donations. Even the creation of the European Union and the creation of the eurozone, all of these things are significant triumphs in the global coup by the 1%. And within specific countries, you can also identify, important victories that they've achieved as well. I mean, anytime a country takes a loan from the IMF or the World Bank or any other international so called development bank, and then they begin to implement the macroeconomic reforms that are always recommended or demanded, stipulated, in the loan agreements. Those are victories for the 1%. That's victories for this billionaires revolution. Like in Egypt, for example, the loan that they took And then the law that they, imposed banning third party opposition to investor activity, the cutting of food subsidies, food and fuel subsidies in Egypt and in other countries that have, succumb to the IMF. All of these represent successes, for the A revolution of the 1%. I think it's vital for us to understand that, what is happening is a revolution against state Sovereignty and political authority. And at this project of the 1%, if you wanna call it that, the owners and controllers of global financialized capital, this project moves forward By means of key events, it's not something that's inevitable. It's not some sort of natural disaster that cannot be anticipated, resisted or thwarted. Certain things have happened, which have allowed it to triumph, and certain things are still being pursued, And we can do something about those things. We can anticipate those things. We can respond to those things preemptively. We have to recognize this So that we can identify any upcoming events or plans, steps that they're gonna wanna take, that will consolidate their power and compound our subjugation. Once we identify these things, then we can organize ourselves and adopt a strategy that will turn those events in our favor because they are turning points. They will either be victories for them or victories for us, depending on what we do about it.
RealAndyLeeShow
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 2:37 AM
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 3:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A small, wealthy elite controls the world, making decisions that benefit themselves and their supporters. We must acknowledge this reality and discuss it openly. The powerful fear social media and the internet because they level the playing field, allowing anyone to challenge them. Bad governments are falling, and people are reclaiming their power. Knowledge is power, and we should resist being governed. We rule governments.

@RealAndyLeeShow - Andy Lee - Special Rebel Rapporteur

There is a concentration of people in control of our world who run in relatively small, elite pockets of our population, whose power is largely dependant upon their personal wealth and/or capacity to influence. This tiny concentration make the bulk of the decisions for the other 99% of the population not privy to their inner circles, and those decisions oft benefit those people in power and enrich supporters and the ladder-climbers surrounding them that are chasing status - far more than the population they have control over. Saying this aloud had ought not be controversial. It is not a conspiracy, and should be shouted from our rooftops and discussed in civilian meetings. Powerful, controlling people will always try to maintain control. We need to take it from them. This is why they hate social media and the free press and the internet and want to control all of those things. They equalize any financial handicaps, they allow us to share and organize, and those who have everything have to face off against those who have nothing on their wits alone. They are losing, and badly. Anyone can achieve an equal if not greater politico-social status sans cronyism now and challenge them on a more level playing field, and they are crumbling under scrutiny. Bad governments are falling, and the people are resuming their rightful places as the supreme rulers of their countries. As the rightful order of things is restored, and the concentration of power is removed from the 1% and placed back into the hands of the 99%, more and more people will choose resistance over compliance. Knowledge is power. Consume it. We should always remain ungovernable. Governments do not rule us. We rule governments.

@diana_c2021 - Diana C #NoDigitalID #NoCBDC

@RealAndyLeeShow @David_Mulroney We live in the matrix. Red pill ‘em all, Andy. Go girl.

IanMalcolm84
Posted - May 29, 2024 at 3:58 PM
Saved - May 29, 2024 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A series of posts raises questions about a group's control over various aspects of society, including culture, media, politics, and finance. The posts suggest that this control has led to manipulation, subversion, and the suppression of dissenting voices. They also discuss the group's influence over elections, wealth distribution, and the banking system. The posts raise concerns about the impact on native populations, historical cover-ups, and the control exerted through the global vaccine rollout. The posts call for awareness, unity, and the sharing of information to challenge this alleged control.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

“WHAT IF?”🧵 PLEASE RESHARE! WHAT IF a tiny group of people had disproportionate control of culture, news,social media, politicians, banking, tech, finance, your nations’ policy, & married all presidential children? Would it concern if they had subverted & enslaved your people? https://t.co/N7RlhiXtYf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews are powerful, rich, and control the media. We should not apologize for our strength and influence in public debate. We have contributed greatly to this country's success. Use our strength for peace without apology, as peace comes through strength. Thank you for listening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jews are too powerful. We're too strong. We're too rich. We control the media. We have too much this. We have too much that. And we often apologetically deny our strength and our power. Don't do that. Don't do that. We have earned the right to influence public debate. We have earned the right to be heard. We have contributed disproportionately to the success of this country. Never ever apologize for using our strength and our influence in the interest of peace. And if you need a biblical source for it, just remember the psalmist who said, Hashem owes. God will give the Jewish people strength, owes. And then, only then, only then will God give the Jewish people peace. Peace will come for the Jewish people and the Jewish nation only through strength. Never apologize for using your strength for peace. Thank you. I look forward to a couple of question.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF every aspect of your culture was so manipulated that your television, radio, smartphone, teachers, & even parents became completely immersed in the massage of a machine orchestrated by this group, that even basic history was used to deceive. You’re living in Orwell’s 1984 https://t.co/2sTAV4XPNq

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF we all knew this so intrinsically true that comedians joked about it right to our faces without ever connecting the basic dots as to “they” were? What if THAT GROUP’S MEMBERS even acknowledged it in front of you? https://t.co/OF9ZZgPQgJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a list of influential people in various industries, noting the high number of Jewish individuals. They mention how different people interpret this list, some seeing privilege, conspiracy theories, or intellectual opposition. These interpretations can lead to anti-Semitic conclusions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: List of the 50 most influential people in given industries, the 50 big mockers in media, in finance, in other places. And the intention of the piece was to say, look, they're all white men, or they're mostly white men. But I looked at it and thought, oh shit, there's so many Jews. And David Duke looked at it and said, look at all those Jews. And Louis Farrakhan looked at it and said, look at all those Jews. So concepts like privilege or or or conspiracy theorizing or just the general campaign against heterodox forms of of thinking, against against intellectual difference and disputation, none of this is anti Semitic on its face. All of it leads in an anti Semitic conclusion. Right. So the 50 most influential people in
Video Transcript AI Summary
The wealthy business interests control everything, not politicians. They own land, corporations, and media. They lobby for self-interest, not critical thinking citizens. They want obedient workers, not informed individuals. The system benefits them, not the people. It's a rigged game, but many are unaware or indifferent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The real owners, the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. They're they're they're irrelevant. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls. They got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media media news all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They they spend 1,000,000,000 of dollars every year lobbying lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interest. That's right. You know something? They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don't want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And now they're coming for your social security money. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club. By the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when They tell you what to believe. All day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. The table is tilted, folks. The game is rigged, and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF as a result of their control over #politics, elections became meaningless? After all, if both your liberal and conservative options had their allegiances purchased by this outside force, does it even matter who wins an election? If both sides are compromised... https://t.co/tkViyoD2lo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel's control over American politics is highlighted, with claims of buying Congress, the presidency, and the media. The speaker criticizes the American media for not condemning Israel's actions, accusing them of being owned by Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu is labeled as the world's most evil man, and Americans are urged to reflect on their country's actions. The speaker expresses disappointment in America's current state.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What it tells you is the control that Israel has over the American domestic political reality. Israel controls everything. We're not a sovereign state anymore. Israel literally has bought the American Congress and bought the American presidency, and bought the American establishment. Where's the American media? You know, I was always one of those people that sort of got a little uneasy when people would put up the, you know, the list of, you know, media media moguls in America and talked about how many of them were Jewish and how many had links to Israel. I'm like, oh god. That's a little anti Semitic, don't you think? Not anymore. Because the silence of the American media is deafening. The American media is standing by and allowing Israel to commit genocide, and they're not doing a damn thing about it. This should be at the top of everybody's. This should be the lead story. They should be calling out the hypocrisy of the Biden administration. They should be condemning Benjamin Netanyahu. They should be condemning Israel, but they can't because Israel owns them. Israel owns everything. And so America is going to be sacrificed on the altar of Zionism, on the altar of this Israeli state. This is all about assuaging the ego of Benjamin Netanyahu, the world's most evil man today. There's nobody in the world more evil than Benjamin Netanyahu, and he's an American friend. This is Christmas. I hope I marry every American listening looks in the mirror and pukes because that's what you should do when you look at your reflection. Because you're an American. You stand for nothing except the depth of so many people. We suck as a country. We have become so far off course. It's not even funny. Look. There's nothing the put it

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that group owned the media so thoroughly that this control was always overlooked & dissents shut down? Instead other “villains”, like white supremacy, were propagandized to deflect from that control to keep people fighting one another rather than their hateful oppressors https://t.co/dVfccsDoVv

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that group had constructed cultural Marxism as a means to drive culturally subversive agendas (porn, feminism, racism) that align with communistic ideals as a way to destroy the heritage & family dynamics that built the healthy, productive society they aimed to destroy? https://t.co/VvMCX9yLVB

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF that control extended across social media platforms they owned (Zuckerberg & Elon both) and ALL conservative voices were merely controlled opposition that shaped public opinion without ever allowing the sheep to notice who really controlled their minds? https://t.co/lZqOtNkJPv

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a center in Silicon Valley run by a former Facebook executive, with software engineers and data scientists monitoring various platforms like Google, YouTube, Meta, Twitter, Reddit, Steam, and Amazon. We collaborate with companies from Apple to Zoom, including Twitter since its inception. We engage with both the old and new regimes, even discussing with Elon Musk. The ADL holds daily meetings with social media and other companies to regulate speech. The ADL is not a civil rights group but an intelligence organization working for a foreign entity.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're gonna wanna hear this. We opened a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017, and the woman who runs it, she's the next Facebook executive. I have software engineers and data scientists working at ADL. We're monitoring all this stuff, and we're working with all the platforms, by the way, Google and YouTube and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple to Zoom, we work with all of them. Okay? That's relevant because we've been working with Twitter now for real since it was founded. We work with the old regime, working with the new regime. Like, I'm talking to Elon, and we're trying to work with them. Speaker 1: He's literally bragging out loud about how they have daily meetings with all the social media companies. Sorry. Not even just social media platforms. He said Zoom. Private conversations in order to censor speech they do not like. And let's just be a 100% straight up. The ADL is not a civil rights group. It is an intelligence organization operating within the United States on behalf of another country.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am deeply connected to Israel and seek citizenship to stand with its people. My support is not just words, but actions. Despite challenges, I choose to align with those fighting for the right to live. My request for citizenship is rooted in standing for what is right and true. Israel and America embody this spirit. I took my children to Israel after visiting Auschwitz, teaching them the importance of history. May Israel remain a symbol of hope and resilience.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Know why I was born. But there is something about the state of Israel that connects deeply to me. To have the privilege to stand with the Jew is a tremendous honor, spiritually. So I wanna read a letter that I, wrote that I am sending to the state of Israel. To prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the honorable officials at the state of Israel, in this moment, I have chosen to ask you for citizenship in the state of Israel. I have nothing to offer but my voice of support, and some might say that my support might be more valuable as an independent voice. Perhaps they're correct. But my request for citizenship is not about words. It is about deeds. Why, one might wonder, would I want to embrace a heritage and identity that is so ruthlessly hunted down again and again? Yet it is precisely during such moments that we must choose to stand. I anticipate no privileges or exemption from the state of Israel. I instead yearn to align myself with those willing to rise, to fight, and sacrifice for the fundamental right to live. Is this not what both Israel and America embody? In closing, my desire for dual citizenship does not stem from any expectation of gain, but from a deep rooted belief in standing with what is right and true. 10 years ago, I took my children to Israel for the first time, but we first visited Auschwitz in Poland. I told them, you cannot understand Israel without the bible or Auschwitz. May Israel remain an eternal flame of hope, a beacon of resilience, and a testament to the enduring human spirit. I don't know why I was born.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF through that control of power, they had monopolized egregiously excessive levels of the wealth of your nation while, through nepotism & bigotry, sharing & passing it on only to people “in their club” How does 2% of the US population make up half of the billionaires? https://t.co/5P4KtADQIm

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if, with these riches, these individuals positioned themselves to take control of ALL companies to ensure they could insert their chosen while destroying any opposed to their world views? After all, if you can’t become financially independent, you’re forever enslaved. https://t.co/w2kMn9Lvz9

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF great minds, like @noble_x_x_ & others below worked to explain the significance of this problem which your media intentionally obfuscated?

@noble_x_x_ - Noble

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard collectively manage $20 TRILLION of assets …the entire GDP of the U.S. is only $23 trillion Now here's how BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard control you with those assets First, we need to understand that owning a stock means you own a portion of the corporation the stock is issued based on And with that ownership comes one very important right: the right to vote your shares to determine what the corporation does Shareholder voting within a corporation is exactly as it sounds: you vote on certain issues and proposals put forth by the corporation. The more shares you have, the more votes you get — so if you own 30% of all the shares of the company, you get 30% of the votes. Results of votes are generally decided by simple majority. Pretty straight forward, right? Now what gets voted on at these shareholder meetings? The voting determines the major changes to how the corporation will maintain or change the way it interacts with the world around it as well as how the corporation is managed internally These votes can determine big things, to name a few: -diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives -executive compensation -board of director's policies -the political policies of the corporation However hands down the biggest decision made by the shareholder vote is who sits on the board of directors. The board of directors decides: -the objectives and goals of a company -the management and senior executives of a company -the company policies (including political policies) -brand image and advertising Yes — there is some overlap between what the board of directors does and what the shareholder vote determines. Responsibilities differ from company to company Now that we have the basics out of the way, how does voting shares of a corporation play in to BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard (I'll call them "BSSV" from now on) controlling you? Let's first look at how each of BSSV's ownerships are structured (all three are basically structured the same) What BSSV generally does is pretty simple: they buy stock shares of a specific company (Apple, Tesla, etc.) and package those stock shares with similar stock shares in to something called an ETF or a Mutual Fund. Then they sell a piece of resulting pool of those stocks to you so you can own a bunch of stocks without having to buy each of them individually (this is simplified but the basics hold true) For instance, let's say you want to buy technology companies but don’t know which specific company you want to buy or you can't afford to buy a bunch of different companies. In that case, BSSV would simplify the process for you by buying stocks of a whole bunch of different tech companies that they then package in to an ETF or Mutual Fund which you can then buy shares in allowing you to get ownership to all those companies at a fraction of the cost and effort! And these bundles can be created with any industry, sector, or with any other group of companies — from tech to oil to the entire S&P 500 So it seems like a win-win, right? You get to own a bundle of a bunch of different stocks you couldn’t otherwise get access to and BSSV gets a very small fee for helping you get that exposure They seem like such nice guys, right? How on earth could this be sinister? Not so fast — when you buy these stocks through BSSV in ETFs and Mutual funds you give up one very important thing: you give up your right to vote at the shareholder meeting for each of those individual companies You give up the right to choose the board of directors who determine the course of actions the company will pursue and you give up the right to vote on those political and policy decisions directions the company will take But most importantly: YOU GIVE THAT VOTING RIGHT TO BSSV “So what, BSSV can vote a few shares of a company? There must be way more shareholders out there that also vote” For this, I'd ask you to do an experiment. Pick any major company. Now google who its largest Shareholders are The largest shareholders will almost always include or be composed of BSSV. Of all the stocks in the S&P 500 at least one of the members of BSSV is the largest shareholder in 88% of the companies “But on average they only collectively own around 15% of most of these companies, that's not 50% control” True but a 15% difference in voting for board members or policies where most other shareholders are indifferent or uneducated on the policies (thus their votes are closer to a 50/50 split) is enough to sway almost every item that's voted on “Well at least the three of them must have differing views? They all must compete for different shareholder vote outcomes, right?” Wrong The unique thing about BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard is that their own largest shareholders are: Each Other So they all decide each other's boards of directors and all control each other's shareholder votes. Then once BSSV's own boards are chosen they choose the boards of the companies they control Now how is this control actually exerted? What are the manifestations of it that actually impact us? I'll keep this succinct so this doesn't run too long but corporations exert control over our society in a number of ways On the social front this means BSSV can control almost every intersection of our lives with corporations. Our news, our social media, our financial institutions, our cinema and television, our retailers, our clothing stores, and even our food are all subservient to BSSV and the boards of directors they appoint In the political landscape this control can be exerted through campaign contributions, lobbying, PACS, issue advocacy, regulatory capture, think tanks, revolving doors, trade associations, policy development, and campaign advertising amongst others (to name a few) This is also why every corporation appears to be move in lock-step in their support of things like ESG investing, Black Lives Matter, and other social causes: because behind the scenes BSSV purposefully elects boards that champion their values and beget their interests The players on each board are different but their ideologies are the same…because their ideologies are BSSV's ideology For many years now BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard have controlled almost every aspect of our lives without us knowing Let's break that cycle (@patrickbetdavid does a good analysis in this video as well but imo disregards the importance of voting rights as the mechanism of control) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mvh4o6x3-GQ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF, speaking of wealth, your nations entire banking system had been architected, not to protect its people, but to forever enslave them as a nation into endlessly covering the costs for the ultra rich & foreign governments? Perhaps like our federal reserve #economics https://t.co/QtUNhBpVXn

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that tiny group of people used that control to shape opinions of the masses in favor of policies extremely detrimental to the native people of that country? To vote against their own wages & the protection of their culture via endless immigration of poor, violent migrants https://t.co/8T9bV1zHEy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Wir werden in einer multikulturellen Stadt leben, die von verschiedenen Ethnien lebt. Es sterben mehr Deutsche als geboren werden, aber wir machen ein Experiment, eine monokulturelle Demokratie in eine multiethnische umzuwandeln. Unsere Gesellschaft wird sich radikal verändern, und das ist gut so, besonders in Richtung Rechts. We will live in a multicultural city with many different ethnicities. More Germans die than are born, but we are trying to transform a monocultural democracy into a multiethnic one. Our society will change drastically, and that's a good thing, especially towards the right.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wir werden in einer Stadt leben, in der es einfach ist, dass unsere Stadt davon lebt, dass wir ganz viele verschiedene Ethnien haben, ganz viele Menschen, dass wir eine super kulturelle Gesellschaft haben, meine Damen und Herren. Speaker 1: Jedes Jahr sterben mehr Deutsche als geboren während. Das liegt zum Glück daran, dass die Nazis sich auch nicht besonders verfehlt werden. Zum Zweiten, dass wir hier ein historisch einzigartiges Experiment wagen, und zwar in einem multiethenische, monokulturelle Demokratie in einem multiethenische zu verwandeln. Das kann klappen, das wird glaub ich auch klappen. Aber dabei kommt es natürlich auch zu vielen Bewerbungen. Speaker 0: Unsere Gesellschaft wird sich ändern. Unsere Stadt wird sich radikal verändern. Ich bin der Auffassung, dass wir in Und ich sage Ihnen noch ganz deutlich: Gerade hier in Richtung Rechts, Ich sage Ihnen noch ganz deutlich, gerade hier in Richtung Rechts, das ist gut so!

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF.. that group was so bold with their control that they celebrated it right in your face encouraging “their people” to embrace, continue, and further this monopoly on power... would THAT concern you? What if that same group celebrated white extinction & genocide? https://t.co/qdt4TAfC5x

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that Jews are influential worldwide because it is God's will. They mention the Torah as proof, stating that Jews will always stand out in every nation. Despite being a small community compared to Americans, Jews are prominent in various fields like politics, with examples given of Jewish involvement with Trump, Biden, and Obama. The speaker highlights the historical pattern of Jewish influence in different countries and urges against hatred.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Jews run the show in the world, not because they want, because that's what God wants. And it's written in the Torah that the non Jews admit that it's the word of God. If they didn't admit, what's the proof? But in the Torah, it says that in every nation you will be, you will always be the highlight of the place. Even though we have very small community compared to America, 300,000,000 Americans, 5,000,000 Jews. No comparison. But the Jews are everywhere. Politics. All the assistance of Trump, Jews. All the assistance of Sleepy Joe Jews. Obama, Jews, everyone around them, reformed Jew, conservative Jews, Chabadnik, this, Convent. It's all somehow. Same thing was in Spain. Same thing was in many different countries. Instead of hating the
Video Transcript AI Summary
Europeans will pay dearly for their ignorance, as Islam aims to eradicate Italy and Christianity. This war is seen as necessary for Israel's protection. The rise of Islam in Europe is viewed as a positive development for the Jewish people. The prophecy foretells that Israel will ultimately prevail and dominate the world.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vous allez le payer très cher les européens, mais à point, vous n'avez même pas notion de quoi on parle. Et vous n'aurez pas aussi. Quand l'Italie disparaîtra, quand Edom, c'est pour ça que le q g de la chrétienté qui vient de Essave se trouve là-bas, quand cet endroit-là disparaîtra et c'est ce que veut faire l'islam il s'occupe l'islam c'est le le ballet d'Israël sachez-le. C'est-à-dire que je vous jure qu'on fasse son travail et on voit pour Dieu le problème. Quand il va débarrasser tout ça et que le va va revenir chez nous alors c'est. Cette guerre-là dans le monde dans lequel on vit elle est nécessaire pourquoi est-ce qu'elle est nécessaire parce que l'un va utiliser l'autre pour ne pas qu'Israël rentre en guerre Akadosh Barch, Tabarshi Molaad, il est le Krafat Saïm, va provoquer que Ischmael se lève contre Issa. Donc ce que vous êtes en train de subir en France, en Europe, fait tellement peur, ça devrait être pour nous la plus belle nouvelle de notre histoire juive. Enfin, on commence à s'y accrocher. Enfin, on commence à réaliser ce que les sages nous avaient prescrit avant. Ce que je vous ai dit tout à l'heure c'est marqué dans le sien viendra que quand Edom, l'Europe, la chrétienté sera totalement tombée. Je vous pose la question, c'est une bonne nouvelle que l'islam envahisse l'Europe C'est une excellente nouvelle, ça lance dans une machine. Speaker 1: De grandes hécatombes se prépareront dans le pays d'Edom Rome c'est un jour de vengeance pour l'éternel une année de représailles pour la cause de. Tout ça, c'est marqué dans le prophète. Speaker 2: Et ce sera le monde juif qui va grandir et grandir et que ce serait la nation qui elle va gérer le monde. La terre d'Israël, la catastrophe d'autrui va la tirer le monde entier, ça sera Israël et Israël, ça sera Yeru Shalaïm. Et la seule personne qui va dominer dans le monde, ce sera d'être attaché. Avec le macher, cette pierre qui elle va grandir, sera le peuple d'Israël.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF these same patterns had emerged previously in other nations resulting in conflict: & expulsions as the same turmoil and poverty had been pushed on generations of the past? WHAT IF we were seemingly repeating predictable cycles?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

You live in Weimerica 2.0 🧵 Almost a century ago, post-WW1 Germany was in rubble; its people & culture impoverished & humiliated. Its infrastructure & economy was destroyed by a corrupt minority “group” which monopolized their banking, politics,& media Sound familiar? READ ON: https://t.co/Ry6RQr3i7g

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Weimar Republic in Germany was marked by high unemployment, hunger, and despair among the people. Suicide rates were high, with over 30% unemployment leading to desperate actions. Birth rates were low, and anarchy and chaos prevailed. The disarmed and hungry German population felt helpless as communists took control of parts of cities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Unemployment, hunger, and a hopeless future distinguished the Weimar Republic to the German people. Suicide rates were high. Unemployment topped 30% as desperate Germans committed suicide. Birth rates were extremely low. Anarchy and chaos was in the air. There was nothing the disarmed, humiliated and hungry German people could do about it as communists even seized parts of many cities. In 19

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that group, to cover up these historical patterns had constructed elaborate, demonstrably dishonest stories to deflect any and all critiques? WHAT IF those stories contained indefensible plot holes? (THIS IS CLEARLY JUST A QUESTION NOT A STATEMENT)

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

👀QUESTION👀 Why would Anne Frank's step sister Eva Schloss claim that photographic evidence of the liberation of Auschwitz was all “fake”? She states film crews went back MONTHS LATER and staged it Does this not make you question this piece of “history”? 🔎 @TonightsGame https://t.co/nsI6vc4iC8

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions the liberation of all camps in Poland, not just Auschwitz. They point out that photos of the Russian liberation of Auschwitz lack snow, which was actually present. The Russian embassy confirmed that the photos were taken after the fact when cameras were available. The speaker emphasizes that the photos do not accurately depict Auschwitz's liberation due to the lack of snow and the presence of well-dressed individuals and children.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And only Auschwitz. They liberated all the camps in Poland, and that is really not known. And something I wanted to point out to you, you know, there are many pictures about the Russian liberating Auschwitz, and there's never any snow. And the snow was honestly that high. Mhmm. And so I have some connection with the Russian embassy, and I was there once. And I said, something puzzles me. Those photos are fakes because there's no snow. And they said, well, yes, they are not fakes. But when the army came, they didn't have cameras. They didn't photograph. So only much later when they realized we should have pictures of it, they took pictures Right. Like you see now. But this is definitely not in Auschwitz and not the liberation of ours. The the There were not that many people with clothes and children and no snow. Right. Fascinating. So I only Auschwitz.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that “history” was seemingly merely a projection to cover up their prior wrongdoings and to obscure truths about their aspirations for world domination? What if terms they created, like “the final solution”, were entirely, intentionally misattributed?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

THE FINAL SOLUTION🧵 As genocide in Gaza is being compared to the “evil NAZIs”, it’s time we explore some unusual & inconvenient truths from WW2. Buckle up, this’ll be uncomfortable For starters, did you know, historically,Jews had been expelled from 100 nations? Why? READ ON👇 https://t.co/qa9d8YG3NA

Video Transcript AI Summary
For centuries, Europeans and Jews have struggled to coexist, with Jews being expelled from over 100 nations. They were granted full rights but allegedly exploited and corrupted host nations, leading to conflicts. Jewish supremacists often attribute these issues to antisemitism.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For centuries, Europeans and Jews have had problems living together. The Jews have been expelled from over 100 nations before. This expulsion was not something new. Every single nation with the Jews were given full rights and privileges. They had exploited and morally corrupted the host nation, defiled the Gentiles, and then created uproars against themselves. The Jewish supremacists have, of course, always been able to put a blame on quote unquote antisemitism. The National

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that ideology was once put in place under the rule of that group only to result in the worst recorded #genocide in history? A genocide most are completely ignorant to as it’s not taught in schools or propagandized by #Hollywood - perhaps due to aforementioned control?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM🧵 Little to NO education is given on the origin of #communism or its inseparable bond to Zionism. Time to fix that in an emotionless fashion. No animosity intended We must begin with Moses Hess, the father of #Zionism #Palestine #israel #Gaza_under_attack https://t.co/LnXddAgI06

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 19th century, Moses Hess introduced communist principles and laid the groundwork for Zionism in his book "Rome and Jerusalem." He advocated for a Jewish ethno state in Palestine, despite the Arab majority. Hess believed in a race struggle between Aryans and Semites, with Jews emerging as superior. He promoted eugenics, racial purity, and a future Jewish state. He also criticized Christianity as the "religion of death" and predicted a war in Europe involving Germany, Italy, and Austria.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the middle of 19th century, Moses Hess formulated the first written principles of communism. In 18/62, Hess or the communist rabbi as he was called, wrote the book Rome and Jerusalem in which he laid the foundations for a Jewish nationalist movement called Zionism. In the book, he called on the Jewish people to become separatists and to prepare for the creation of a future homogeneous Jewish ethno state. Palestine would be occupied by the Jewish people, but the big problem was Palestine was at this time 19 to 95% Arab. Hess argued that international Jewish bankers would help in this realization of stealing the land from the Palestinians. Hess suggested in his book that one last race and class struggle was being developed between the Aryans and the Semites. In this fight, has predicted that the Jews would stand as winners and the Europeans as losers. The Jews would stand superior over all of the peoples and because Jews had preserved their racial purity over the centuries, it would give them a leading role in the world. Hess essentially promoted eugenics and racial hygiene for the Jews and talked about a future Jewish ethno state. He also referred to Christianity as the religion of death. Fascinatingly, he predicted a future war in Europe with Germany, Italy, and Austria involved as part of a race struggle. Most success was

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that group has commit MULTIPLE genocides, all driven by the same ethnic hatred and a belief of racial superiority? https://t.co/RheYZ3WBqB

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF that group was almost universally in control of a global vaccine that was rolled out and coerced into the arms of the masses by controlled politicians & media? What if that vaccine was now resulting in endless illnesses & deaths for all BUT THOSE IN THAT GROUP? https://t.co/y7u6Pnha5M

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the fight against COVID-19, Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla, a child of Holocaust survivors, played a key role in developing the vaccine. His Jewish heritage and support for Israel are notable. Over 2.5 billion Pfizer vaccine doses have been distributed worldwide. For his contributions, Dr. Bourla received the 2022 Genesis Prize, known as the Jewish Nobel Prize. The pandemic continues, but Dr. Bourla's efforts have made a significant impact in saving lives globally.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the global fight against COVID 19, the Jewish people who make up a tiny percentage of the world's population have had an outsized impact in the difficult battle to protect lives as scientists. Chief medical officers, and top health care officials. Yet the contributions of one extraordinary person tower above the rest. That extraordinary person is Pfizer chairman and CEO, doctor Albert Bourla. Doctor Bourla led his team to deliver a COVID 19 vaccine in record A child A child of holocaust survivors from a Greek Jewish community destroyed by the Nazis, he's proud of his Jewish heritage, is active in holocaust remembrance and education, and a strong supporter of Israel, which was the first country outside the US to receive the Pfizer vaccine and the antiviral pill. The pandemic is certainly not over, but the world is infinitely better off with doctor Borla helping lead the charge to save lives with more than 2 and a half 1000000000 Pfizer vaccine doses already distributed. Because of doctor Borla's extraordinary contribution to humanity as the world battles the worst health crisis in 100 years, Doctor Albert Bourla has been selected as the recipient of the 2022 Genesis Prize, the Jewish Nobel Prize. Thank you, and congratulations, doctor Borla.
Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID-19 targets Caucasians, Black people, and Chinese. We must ensure everyone has access to tools to combat the virus, not just those who can afford them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID 19 is targeted to attack, Caucasians and and, and, black people. The people who are most immune are asking us to choose and, and Chinese. Speaker 1: But also reminded of us when we have these weapons, these weapons. Speaker 0: These weapons Speaker 1: our these these tools, we must find ways that they reach all and not only those that they can afford.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that same group used historical atrocities like slavery & the Holocaust to justify endless hatred of the host whites while hiding their involvement in precisely those injustices? What if THEY were the ones who commit genocide in WW2 and enslaved the majority of Africans? https://t.co/5vW5pS1U0G

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews played a significant role in the slave trade in Brazil, Suriname, Curacao, Barbados, and Jamaica. The two largest slave shipments to the US in the 18th century were on Jewish-owned ships. Aaron Lopez, a prominent slave ship owner, was Jewish. In Newport, Rhode Island, all rum distilleries during the slave trade era were owned by Jews. Census data from 1830 shows a higher per capita ownership of slaves by Jewish households in the US compared to white gentiles.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. It is true as we now know that the Jews were the major element in the slave trade in Brazil in the 1600, in Suriname, in Curacao, in Barbados, in Jamaica. Yes, it is true, as we now know, that the 2 largest single shipments of slaves coming into this country in 18th century were on ships owned by Jews. It is true, as we now know, that Aaron Lopez, biggest slave ship owner in the United States of America, was a Jew. It is also true, as we now know, that all the rum distilleries in Newport, Rhode Island, in the era of the slave trade were owned by Jews. Rum, as we know, was a very important item in the transatlantic slave trade. Yes. It is true, as we now know, that there was a higher per capita ownership of slaves in the United States of America by Jews, done by white gentiles. We now know from the 18 30 census of the US of 8, that something like 75% of Jewish households own slaves as opposed to just 30 odd percent for the white population as a whole. Yes,
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why white men are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. Another speaker suggests that Jewish dominance in academia and publishing allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians or whites, while operating behind the scenes. Jews, like Meyer Lansky in the mafia, are portrayed as orchestrating events while deflecting attention onto others.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is the white man always vilified for this when it was the Jewish ships and the Arabs that were actually the biggest part of the slave trade? Speaker 1: You have to look at who is dominant in history as far as academia, literature, the publishing houses. Most of them are Jewish ran. It's just like with the mafia. Most people think Italian when it comes to the mafia, but it's really Jewish. Jews are behind the books. Meyer Lansky was the banker of the mafia. He handled the books. So it's like with everything else. The Jews will be behind the scenes. They'll put the blame on whites. They'll put the blame on Italians, the blame on others. That's how they stay hidden to do their thing. Speaker 0: Why is
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish involvement in the African slave trade predates the transatlantic slave trade by about 1000 years. The transatlantic slave trade began in 1441 when Portuguese sailors kidnapped Africans and brought them to Europe. Africans were taken to the Caribbean in 1502, where the transatlantic slave trade started. The theoretical justification for the slave trade was based on the Hamitic myth, also known as the curse of Ham story, to rationalize and justify the trade.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But before I describe what happened, let me spend a couple a few minutes summarizing the facts of Jewish involvement in the slave trade. What precisely was the nature of the Jewish involvement in the African slave trade? The Jewish involvement in the African slave trade begins as far as I can tell long before the actual slave trade across the Atlantic itself. The transatlantic slave trade has its immediate origins around about 14/41 when Portuguese sailors landed on the West African coast and kidnapped a few Africans, brought them back to Europe. Africans were brought back to Europe, to Portugal and to Spain as part of that particular trade for several years. Columbus, of course, arrived in the Americas in 14/92, approximately half a century later. In 15/02, the first Africans were brought to the Caribbean. The Caribbean is where the transatlantic slave trade begins and many Americans don't know that. But for over a 100 years before Africans were brought as slaves to this country, the United States of America, Africans were being brought across the Atlantic to the Caribbean, to places like Hispaniola, the island which today is shared by Haiti and the Dominican Republic and to other places as well. So it seems to me that Jewish involvement then in that transatlantic slave trade precedes by many, many years, perhaps by 1000 years, the actual beginnings of the transatlantic slave trade. And let me explain. It seems to me that the most important theoretical underpinning for that Transatlantic Slave Trade was what has come to be known in many quarters of the Hamitic myth. Some people call it the curse of Ham story. When the slave trade developed beginning in 14/41 and for 100 of years thereafter, people who prosecuted that trade looked around for intellectual justification, for rationalizations, for pretexts, if you want, if you will. And a variety of pretexts were advanced to justify the slave trade, to allow people to sleep well at night.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish historians reveal a history of Jewish involvement in the slave trade, with auctions closing on Jewish holidays. Jews dominated the slave trade for centuries in the Western world, dating back to Roman times. The Roman Jews relied on slavery for income, while Charlemagne and Pope Gelasius allowed Jewish involvement in the slave trade. Throughout history, Jews were prominent slave dealers in European society, with higher slave holdings per capita than non-Jews. This information is documented in various Jewish historical sources.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jewish slave trading on the American continent. Jewish historians record old Jewish documents showing how the slave trade was so thoroughly Jewish. The slave auctions throughout the Americas had to close on Jewish holidays. In Brazil, we see far more slaves in North America. Abe Witzner, another official of the Jewish Historical Society, in his book, Jews in Colonial Brazil, pages they could buy slaves at low prices. If it happened at the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday, the auction had to be postponed. Studying the Jewish histories of the new world, I began to learn of a carefully recorded Jewish history that you and I are not permitted to know about. I discovered that many centuries before the transatlantic slave trade, that Jews had dominated the slave trade in the entire western world of the last 2000 years, even as far back as Roman times. Lincoln and Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia in volume 10 page 48 writes, quote, the trade in slavery constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews. In the 5th century, Pope Gelasius permitted Jews to introduce slaves from Gaul into Italy on the condition that they were non Christian. In the 8th century, Charlemagne explicitly allowed the Jews to act as intermediaries in the slave trade. In a history of the Jews from Babylonian exile to the end of World War 2, published by the Jewish publication exile to the end of World War 2, published by the Jewish Publication Society of America, the author writes, quote, the Jews were among the most important slave dealers in European society. And here's a quote from the famous Jewish historian Jacob Marcus in the Encyclopedia Britannica. He, matter of factly, talks about the Jewish control of commerce in the Middle Ages. Quote, in the dark ages, the commerce of Western Europe was largely in his hand, in particular, the slave trade. Not only were Jews the principal slave traders, they had markedly higher per capita holdings of slaves than did non Jews. Jacob Marxists wrote in the United States Jewry 17/76/1985, page 586, quote, often the 18th century

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if you never learned any of these truths as Hollywood & academia were entirely manipulated to ensure they remained buried? And WHAT IF if all in power to change it were blackmailed by a global pedophile ring run in coordination with corrupt politicians? https://t.co/m42lFYMKpX

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF free speech was continuously being limited & restricted to ensure these types of questions weren’t even allowed to be asked? What if even “right wing” politicians groveled down to this same group to demanded people’s silence? What if it was made ILLEGAL like in Europe? https://t.co/7x1apcMG5C

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF, you’ve never heard these questions? What if you’ve never seen this page as @x hides it? Well it would make sense as it’s CLEARLY censored at every turn BECAUSE I ASK THESE OBVIOUS QUESTIONS But now you know. Now you’ll start to see these obvious patterns. So, what next?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

It’s now undeniable. @X is removing followers from my page along with likes, retweets, & quote tweets of my pinned “What if?” thread- “the machine” is exposed & scared Americans, regardless of political party, it’s time to unify and stand firmly opposed to “this machine” https://t.co/VynS9r0LRQ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if it’s not just me but: @utism @SamParkerSenate @NickJFuentes @ChiefTrumpster @christ_gnosis @raymo_g @TheRISEofROD @pl0t_sickens @pepedownunder @realstewpeters @Lucas_Gage_ @arthurkwonlee @Gentilenewsnet @Genghis_Khan911 @KeithWoodsYT @AtRealBen @RealCandaceO

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF even speaking this truth puts me at risk of shadow banning, suspension, or ejection from social media? If so, IT STILL MUST BE STATED BECAUSE TRUTH MATTERS So PLEASE, SHARE THIS, join this cause, spread the word, awaken the masses - white existence depends on it. https://t.co/NDphjhaK6X

Video Transcript AI Summary
Life cannot be contained. Evolution shows us that it breaks free, expands, and overcomes barriers, sometimes dangerously. That's just the way it is.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not possible. Listen. If there's one thing the history of evolution has taught us, it's that life will not be contained. Life breaks free. It expands to new territories, and it crashes through barriers painfully, maybe even dangerously. But, well, there it is.
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 6, 2024 at 5:58 PM
Saved - July 6, 2024 at 8:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
BlackRock's influence on the president and political system is exposed, highlighting corruption in America. The control of money by hedge funds and banks is emphasized, with the claim that war benefits their business. The ability to buy a senator is suggested with a $10K price tag.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

America Is So Corrupt James O’Keefe Literally Caught BlackRock Confirming They Control The President & Absolutely Nothing Happened You DO NOT get who you vote for you get who BlackRock PAYS FOR ‘Let me tell you, it's not who the president is. It's who's controlling the wallet of the president” “The hedge funds, BlackRock, the banks. These guys run the world” “War is real f***ing good for business” You got $10K? You can buy a senator"

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock recruiter reveals how financial institutions buy politicians to control the world. They acquire diverse industries to minimize risk and generate exponential growth. Serge Varley explains how owning a little bit of everything gives power and money to influence politics. He mentions the Senate as a place where money can buy influence. War, like the Ukraine-Russia conflict, is seen as an opportunity for profit due to market volatility. BlackRock's influence on politics and culture is highlighted in the investigation. Serge Varley's role as a gatekeeper at BlackRock is emphasized, showing the power he holds in shaping lives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They they Speaker 1: don't wanna be in the news. They they don't want Speaker 2: people to talk about them. Speaker 1: They don't wanna be anywhere on the radar. Speaker 3: Why not? Speaker 1: It's on film, but I suspect it's probably because it's easier to do things when people aren't thinking about it. All of these financial institutions, they buy politicians. You can take this big ton of money, and then you can start to buy people. I work for, a company called BlackRock. Speaker 0: Meet Serge Varley, a recruiter at BlackRock. Speaker 1: Let me tell you, it's not the person who's the president. It's who's controlling the the wallet. So it's it's Speaker 3: And who's that? Speaker 1: The hedge funds across the banks. These guys want to buy that. Compaint financing. Yep. You can buy and obviously, we have the system for us. First, there's the senate. You got $10 you can buy, so Speaker 2: I can give you 500 k right now. No question. Speaker 1: Yeah. I didn't do this. We're done. Speaker 3: Just like everybody do that? Does BlackRock do that? It's like, you know, Speaker 1: it's like now. It doesn't matter who lands. They're so good. They're they're my. Speaker 0: Here is Serge Varley on how good war is for BlackRock's business. Speaker 3: Do you have any, thoughts on the Ukraine Russia war? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I I do have thoughts. Speaker 3: What do you what do you mean? Speaker 1: Ukraine is good for business. You you know? Okay? I'll give you an example. Russia Russia blows up Ukraine's grain size. Price of wheat's gonna go mad up. The Ukrainian economy is tied very largely to the wheat market, global wheat market. Prices of bread, you know, and literally everything is because of the now. This is fantastic if you're trading. Volatility creates opportunity to make profit. War is no no. It's exciting when goes wrong. Right? Rockrock manages 20, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000. It's a comprehensive numbers. Speaker 0: Blackrock Serge Varley says all of this is above a normal person's understanding. Speaker 1: You're like a undercover reporter. I don't know. No. No. No. People don't give a shit. This is this is beyond them. The whole thing of, like, domination in the world, a concept that shit is so interesting. Speaker 0: Hi. I'm James O'Keefe with OMG News. Here we are with our latest story, this time on BlackRock, 1 of the world's leading asset and investment managers which owns significant shares of companies like Amazon, Microsoft, Anheuser Busch, Meta, Target, Procter and Gamble, Comcast, CNN, Fox and yes, Pfizer, just to name a few. At OMG, we do not shy away from exposing powerful companies, and we're not afraid of powerful people. So we decided to take a look for ourselves at the influence BlackRock has on our politics and the influence they have on our culture. So to do that, what better place to start a hidden a camera investigation than into a self described gatekeeper at BlackRock. Speaker 3: Like, you're kind of like a fucking gatekeeper at BlackRock. Speaker 1: Yeah. I am. I I decide people's face. Every fucking day, I literally decide how somebody's life is going to shape. That's so powerful. Speaker 3: I love that. Yeah. It's So it's just like you hear where it goes. I know. Speaker 1: The the Yeah. It's So it's just like you hear what it is. Speaker 2: And you Speaker 1: know, the the whole thing of, like, domination from a concept that should be. It's so Speaker 0: Introducing Serge Varley, whose LinkedIn says he's worked for Morgan Stanley, Citadel, and now as a recruiter at BlackRock. Speaker 1: I work for, a company called BlackRock. I'm not actually a finance guy. I just I know what happens because I'm including people for duty's sake. Mhmm. I'm the person who headhunts people to my other purpose, so I would approach me and say, hey. This is a good reason why it should Speaker 0: come across. Serge tells us who really runs the world, how they do it, and just how much it costs to buy people, like politicians. Speaker 1: Let me tell you, it's not through who's the president who's controlling the the wall. Yep. You can buy your hands. Speaker 3: So, you know, sorry. Speaker 2: All of Speaker 1: these financial institutions, they buy politicians. Speaker 3: How do they run Speaker 1: the world? You acquire stuff. You diversify, you acquire, you keep acquiring, you spend whatever you make and acquiring more. And at certain point, your risk level is super low. Like, imagine you've invested in, like, 10 different industries from food to to drinks to, like, technology. Right? If 1 1 of them fails, it doesn't matter. You have 9 others to pick you up. The risk management is is inherently in just about everything. And in the finance space, it's all about it's it's all well, it's all about the money you make. You don't you don't let it sit. You, like, you keep using it over and over and it's just Speaker 3: Reinvest? Speaker 1: Yeah. And it's exponential growth. Speaker 3: And then once you just own a little bit of everything, is that where the control Yeah. Speaker 1: You own a little bit of everything, and that little bit of everything gives you so much money on a yearly basis that you can take this big sum of money, and then you can start to buy people. Obviously, we have this system in place. 1st, there's the Senate. You got 10 grand you can buy soon. It doesn't matter who lands. Speaker 3: They're so mad. Speaker 1: They're they're my father. Speaker 2: I could give you 500 k right now. No question asked. Speaker 3: Yeah. Our Speaker 1: identity would need to be done. They're like, yeah. Of course. Why not? Speaker 3: Just like, everybody do that? Does BlackRock do that? Speaker 0: The BlackRock recruiter also tells us about how the US government relies on BlackRock for
IanMalcolm84
Posted - August 1, 2024 at 7:23 PM
Saved - August 4, 2024 at 7:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring some striking statistics regarding Jewish representation in various sectors. Despite Jews being only 2% of the U.S. population, they hold significant positions in Biden’s cabinet, Ivy League presidencies, Hollywood, and tech. The data suggests improbably high representation among billionaires, political donors, and even presidential children. This pattern extends globally, with Jewish leaders in countries like El Salvador and Venezuela. The odds of these occurrences seem astronomically low, raising questions about coincidence and representation.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

🧵The JP DATA & EVIDENCE BELOW🧵 https://t.co/jwLct1ONBB

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

They are 2% of America and 0.2% of the world https://t.co/sjt4lKNA5n

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Biden’s cabinet

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Jews make up 2% of America. And yet, 20 out of 30 of @POTUS’ cabinet are either Jewish or married to a Jew. According to AI, the odds of this are “so much worse than winning the @PowerballUSA Jackpot” that they are “EXTREMELY improbable” Has your government been undermined? https://t.co/rR7K4anWjL

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Ivy League Presidents. It’s increased since this post and is now 7 of 8

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

🚨 @CensoredMen posted that 6 of 8 of the presidents of Ivy League schools are Jewish Jews make up 2% of America According to AI, the odds are better that YOUR CHILD will be the next President of the United States than for 6 Jews to run the schools Are you noticing a pattern? https://t.co/SMUPAEdArJ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Hollywood film producers It’s also increased since this original post and is now 9/10

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Jews are only 2% of the population, but run at least 8 of the 10 largest movie studios According to AI, the odds of this are LOWER than your dad being named Tom Cruise Curiously, in pre-Hitler (Weimar) Germany, Jews were 1% of the population but, of 144 films, wrote 119 of them https://t.co/6usahe3cZY

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

On big tech

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Jews are 0.2% of the world And yet, 5 of the 6 richest people in tech are Jewish According to AI, the odds of this are lower than of YOU being named Bill Gates! At what point is it insane to believe this is mere coincidence? Image courtesy @TheOfficial1984 https://t.co/3lfYQ1SSCl

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

50% of americas richest billionaires https://t.co/ZhGjGphKwq

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

63% of top donors

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Who funds our politicians? 🙋‍♂️ JEWS MAKE UP 2% OF AMERICA And yet, of the top 27 largest donors to the 2020 election, 17 were Jews According to AI, the odds of this are ASTRONOMICALLY SMALL In fact, it says the odds are “SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER” that YOU are named DONALD TRUMP https://t.co/U6sQWfy5KX

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Presidential children. One of Trumps kids has since married a non-Jew. So it’s at 90% of the last 10.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Jews make up only 2% of America and yet, these 9 presidential children ALL married Jews According to AI, the odds of this happening are “significantly LOWER than winning the Powerball Jackpot” Is the AI’s math off? If not, what a WILDLY impossible coincidence, wouldn’t you say? https://t.co/kicc3jLFUt

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

@elonmusk tweet patterns

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Well over a third of all of @elonmusk’s activity on twitter is in response to or highlights accounts owned by Jewish individuals. As Jews are only 2% of the nation, this engagement is SIXTEEN TIMES a normalized distribution. Is this not absurdly unusual? https://t.co/wMENxoelqO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish individuals make up a significant portion of tweets, especially from political accounts and those with higher follower counts. Even among the top retweeted accounts, 32% are Jewish. Overall, Jews are overrepresented in the data by around 15 to 16 times.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Moving on to results. Looking at just the tweets coming from accounts for which ethnic information is available, we see that 25% of them are from Jewish people. And if we look at only tweets coming from political accounts, then this bumps it up to 33% as stated at the beginning of the video. What's more, if you further limit that pool by only looking at accounts above a certain follower account, then the percentage of Jewish individuals continues to trend upwards. First, only accounts above a 1000 followers, then 10,000, 50,000, and so on. I think this is relevant because Musk seems to make a point to interact with accounts with a very few followers, if only one time. Since these accounts are quite small, there's very little information on who runs them. So for most, I just had to assume these people were white if they had light skin. By the time you get up to only accounts with 200,000 followers or more, a full 38% of them are run by Jewish individuals. As just another way to look at this data, if we look at the top 50 most frequently retweeted accounts, we see that 32% of them are Jewish. So very close to the percentage for total tweet count. Alright. So clearly, any way you slice the data, Jews are overrepresented at around 15 to 16 times.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

White House staff. 34%

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

🚨 There are 524 White House staffers; 160 are Jewish Jews make up 2% of America According to AI, these odds are: - “practically unimaginable” - “a cosmic lottery” - “much lower than winning the @PowerballUSA jackpot” @SpeakerJohnson wants to make it illegal to talk about this https://t.co/Gk5XzMnCDn

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

@NBA team ownership

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Blacks are 13% of the US Jews are 2% of the US Blacks make up 70.4% of players Jews own 73% of NBA team Blacks are overrepresented by 5.4x JEWS ARE OVERREPRESENTED by 36.5x The odds of Jews owning this many teams is WORSE than the odds of YOU being named MICHAEL JORDAN 🏀⛹️‍♂️ https://t.co/KiQyECRjIO

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

@BlackRock executive leadership https://t.co/acxkyskVw3

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, a powerful entity, owns a significant portion of major media companies and tech giants. Their investments in China raise concerns about data privacy and potential influence on a global scale. Ordinary individuals unknowingly contribute to BlackRock's wealth through pension funds and bank accounts. With access to vast amounts of personal data, BlackRock's impact on society is substantial and potentially concerning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Larry Fink holds such power. Why is it that you have not heard of them more? There is power in anonymity. If BlackRock is barely featured in print publications and news channels, it's because they want it to be so. If they wanted, they could feature every day. BlackRock currently owns 18% of Fox, 16% of CBS, and 13% of Comcast, which in turn owns NBC, MSNBC, and Sky. If any of those companies wanted to make a decision, they would have to also consult with BlackRock before doing so. The same is true for Google, a tech giant currently worth $853,000,000,000 Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter are also not exempt, and neither is Disney. Thanks to their incredibly diverse investment portfolio in media alone. BlackRock essentially owns 90% of the world's media. If you don't know about them, it's because they don't want you to. Why? Owning a portion of the world doesn't come without its share of scandal or conflict. This 2020, BlackRock became the first foreign company to be allowed into China's mutual industry, which means they can now invest and own parts of Chinese companies, including ones that are blacklisted by the United States. One of the first investments made by BlackRock was in Hikvision, a security and communications firm that essentially makes facial recognition software for use by the Chinese government. But this money isn't just BlackRock's or Mary Finks. It comes from pension funds and bank accounts of ordinary civilians who have unknowingly given money to BlackRock in the past. If we take into account BlackRock's ownership over Western media, banks, ecommerce stores, social media, food and beverages, and many, many more industries, it becomes evident that the company has a wealth of data on us. They may do with it what they please. TikTok's data harvesting pales in comparison to what BlackRock is capable of, given how they have everything from our bank account numbers to our personal tastes and preferences. As BlackRock's investment in China grows, so will China's influence on the world. And our personal data, which was hanging on a thread to begin with, will quickly end up in the wrong hands. With the trajectory BlackRock has been on

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Vanguard, State Street, & Blackrock Presented by @noble_x_x_

@noble_x_x_ - Noble

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard collectively manage $20 TRILLION of assets …the entire GDP of the U.S. is only $23 trillion Now here's how BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard control you with those assets First, we need to understand that owning a stock means you own a portion of the corporation the stock is issued based on And with that ownership comes one very important right: the right to vote your shares to determine what the corporation does Shareholder voting within a corporation is exactly as it sounds: you vote on certain issues and proposals put forth by the corporation. The more shares you have, the more votes you get — so if you own 30% of all the shares of the company, you get 30% of the votes. Results of votes are generally decided by simple majority. Pretty straight forward, right? Now what gets voted on at these shareholder meetings? The voting determines the major changes to how the corporation will maintain or change the way it interacts with the world around it as well as how the corporation is managed internally These votes can determine big things, to name a few: -diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives -executive compensation -board of director's policies -the political policies of the corporation However hands down the biggest decision made by the shareholder vote is who sits on the board of directors. The board of directors decides: -the objectives and goals of a company -the management and senior executives of a company -the company policies (including political policies) -brand image and advertising Yes — there is some overlap between what the board of directors does and what the shareholder vote determines. Responsibilities differ from company to company Now that we have the basics out of the way, how does voting shares of a corporation play in to BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard (I'll call them "BSSV" from now on) controlling you? Let's first look at how each of BSSV's ownerships are structured (all three are basically structured the same) What BSSV generally does is pretty simple: they buy stock shares of a specific company (Apple, Tesla, etc.) and package those stock shares with similar stock shares in to something called an ETF or a Mutual Fund. Then they sell a piece of resulting pool of those stocks to you so you can own a bunch of stocks without having to buy each of them individually (this is simplified but the basics hold true) For instance, let's say you want to buy technology companies but don’t know which specific company you want to buy or you can't afford to buy a bunch of different companies. In that case, BSSV would simplify the process for you by buying stocks of a whole bunch of different tech companies that they then package in to an ETF or Mutual Fund which you can then buy shares in allowing you to get ownership to all those companies at a fraction of the cost and effort! And these bundles can be created with any industry, sector, or with any other group of companies — from tech to oil to the entire S&P 500 So it seems like a win-win, right? You get to own a bundle of a bunch of different stocks you couldn’t otherwise get access to and BSSV gets a very small fee for helping you get that exposure They seem like such nice guys, right? How on earth could this be sinister? Not so fast — when you buy these stocks through BSSV in ETFs and Mutual funds you give up one very important thing: you give up your right to vote at the shareholder meeting for each of those individual companies You give up the right to choose the board of directors who determine the course of actions the company will pursue and you give up the right to vote on those political and policy decisions directions the company will take But most importantly: YOU GIVE THAT VOTING RIGHT TO BSSV “So what, BSSV can vote a few shares of a company? There must be way more shareholders out there that also vote” For this, I'd ask you to do an experiment. Pick any major company. Now google who its largest Shareholders are The largest shareholders will almost always include or be composed of BSSV. Of all the stocks in the S&P 500 at least one of the members of BSSV is the largest shareholder in 88% of the companies “But on average they only collectively own around 15% of most of these companies, that's not 50% control” True but a 15% difference in voting for board members or policies where most other shareholders are indifferent or uneducated on the policies (thus their votes are closer to a 50/50 split) is enough to sway almost every item that's voted on “Well at least the three of them must have differing views? They all must compete for different shareholder vote outcomes, right?” Wrong The unique thing about BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard is that their own largest shareholders are: Each Other So they all decide each other's boards of directors and all control each other's shareholder votes. Then once BSSV's own boards are chosen they choose the boards of the companies they control Now how is this control actually exerted? What are the manifestations of it that actually impact us? I'll keep this succinct so this doesn't run too long but corporations exert control over our society in a number of ways On the social front this means BSSV can control almost every intersection of our lives with corporations. Our news, our social media, our financial institutions, our cinema and television, our retailers, our clothing stores, and even our food are all subservient to BSSV and the boards of directors they appoint In the political landscape this control can be exerted through campaign contributions, lobbying, PACS, issue advocacy, regulatory capture, think tanks, revolving doors, trade associations, policy development, and campaign advertising amongst others (to name a few) This is also why every corporation appears to be move in lock-step in their support of things like ESG investing, Black Lives Matter, and other social causes: because behind the scenes BSSV purposefully elects boards that champion their values and beget their interests The players on each board are different but their ideologies are the same…because their ideologies are BSSV's ideology For many years now BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard have controlled almost every aspect of our lives without us knowing Let's break that cycle (@patrickbetdavid does a good analysis in this video as well but imo disregards the importance of voting rights as the mechanism of control) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mvh4o6x3-GQ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Federal Reserve

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF, speaking of wealth, your nations entire banking system had been architected, not to protect its people, but to forever enslave them as a nation into endlessly covering the costs for the ultra rich & foreign governments? Perhaps like our federal reserve #economics https://t.co/xriSzcUevN

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

P0rn0graphy industry https://t.co/u1QQQhjq1V

Video Transcript AI Summary
The porn industry was influenced by Jewish individuals like Reuben Sturman, who controlled the distribution of adult content in the 80s. Sturman faced legal issues for obscenity and tax evasion. Jewish people dominated the industry, with male performers being mostly Jewish and female performers Roman Catholic. Business owners in the industry had Jewish connections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gravitated towards the porn industry because it's like kind of the seedier cousin of the Hollywood industry, which had already been controlled by the Jews. And basically, they pretty much just took it over the godfather of the modern day porn industry. His name was Reuben Starman, who was actually an Orthodox Jew. He owned over 200 bookstores all around the country. He's actually my godfather. What the Jews did pretty much was they revolutionized the adult industry and made it their own. So there was no space for antisemitism, and they basically controlled everything. But back in the eighties, the only way you could get pornography was to go through someone like Reuben Sturman. And he controlled, you know, all of his stories and all the stories that, that he didn't. They had actually had to pay him a tax, to carry his product. Reuben Sermon, actually eventually he died in prison. Not from they tried to get him from his obscenity back in the eighties which was a big thing. And, it actually still is a risk of obscenity risk today. But, he eventually died in prison because of tax evasion because he didn't want to pay taxes. Back in the seventies, the majority of the male pro form performers were Jewish. And the majority of the female performers were Roman Catholic. But all the business owners are pretty much Jewish or have Jewish ties or at some point worked for a Jew. Much founded by the Jews. They

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Advertising: read the below https://t.co/DSHM8ldzph

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Ukraine https://t.co/mlRGCRyDWQ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

El Salvador

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

El Salvador has only 100 Jews in a population of 6,500,00 people That’s 1 in 65,000 people And yet, the president of El Salvador’s wife is Jewish According to AI, odds are MUCH better that YOU’VE played in a World Cup Match Why is this pattern so common? H/T @Punks4Trump https://t.co/Bpz0CMMjgj

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Panama

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Panama has 15,000 Jews out of a total population of 4,468,000 people That’s 3 Jews in every 1,000 people And yet, almost impossibly, they’ve had a Jewish president since 2019 According to AI, this is LESS LIKELY than it would be for YOU to be named Panama H/T @CarolinaIsabelF https://t.co/mBwrhjRPSO

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Argentina & Mexico

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Only 4 in 1,000 Argentinians are Jewish, yet Milei is President Only 3 in 10,000 Mexicans are Jewish and yet Sheinbaum will be president According to AI, you’re TWICE as likely to be struck by lightning as this is to happen… But you’re antisemitic for finding this unusual https://t.co/Y8ZOAdX6NA

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Venezuela

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

There are 6,000 Jews in a total population of 29,395,334 Venezuelans That’s 1 in every 5,000 people Yet, the president of Venezuela is Jewish According to AI, the odds of this are LOWER than of you being named HUGO CHAVEZ WHY ARE THESE IMPROBABILITIES HAPPENING EVERYWHERE?🇻🇪 https://t.co/85uZFwbZqh

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

United Kingdom

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Keir Starmer is the new UK Prime Minister There are 68 MILLION people in the United Kingdom Of those, less than 270,000 are Jews Those odds are roughly 4 in 1,000! But yet, Keir’s wife… IS JEWISH Is it “antisemitic” to be tired of these ABSURD patterns? H/T @thesmokingrdog https://t.co/pgQ2WXmS4Q

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And NO, it’s not “because of IQ”

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

🚨THE IQ LIE Jewish IQ is, on average, 9 points higher than whites BUT IQ amongst groups varies across bell curves and, if we normalize the numbers based on populations to examine GENIUS level IQ, we find, in America, there are 6.5 TIMES as many White geniuses as there are Jews https://t.co/QkOxUY95CZ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

1000+ Expulsions

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Jews have been expelled 1000 TIMES? This is powerful. Is it all true? If so, wow! Courtesy @nada88564211 https://t.co/UJi3J3jZwg

Video Transcript AI Summary
This list details over 1,030 expulsions of Jews throughout history. The speaker blames Jewish behavior for these expulsions, citing Jewish supremacist attitudes and influence in society. They claim that Jewish values, such as celebrating death and vengeance, contribute to conflicts. The speaker warns that the world may seek a permanent solution to the "Jewish problem" if behavior does not change. They criticize Jewish involvement in current events, like the Gaza conflict and COVID-19 vaccines, urging Jews to coexist peacefully with others.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a list of 1,030 kingdoms, city states and cities from which Jews have been expelled between 1200 BC in Egypt and 2014 in San Juan, La Laguana, Guatemala. Why do they always blame their indefensible behavior on everyone else? It's like an Irishman who gets kicked out of 109 pubs in Dublin. Is it the publicans conspiring against one man or is his behavior consistently intolerable? You figure it out because 109 is the usual number popularly quoted for Jewish expulsions. It's in fact much worse. It's 1,030 and probably more. This begs the question, why? In summary, it has to do with the Jewish supremacist predatory nature and chauvinism of Jews to circle their wagons to form insular inbred communities in their host kingdoms, city states and countries when nations and empires arose. America is the latest society to be corrupted by Jewish influences, finance, culture, and values. Abortion is a Jewish value. It's why they defend it so vociferously. America now has a Zionist occupied government where less than 2% of the American population, which are Jewish, occupy 85% of senior cabinet and secretary positions in government. Every major Jewish holiday is about killing and the slaughter of non Jews. They celebrate death whereas Christians and even Muslims celebrate life and herein is the number one reason why Jews have been expelled over and over for over 2000 years. The relentless slaughter of civilians in Gaza is Jewish natural behavior. Vengeance is a Jewish trait. The Talmud is full of it. This time, the world will tire of the Jewish menace and seek a permanent solution to the Jewish problem. The Jews need to be very careful about the conduct of their brethren. As history tells us, it doesn't go well for Jews when they engage in unrestrained hubris in their host nations, including the stolen state of Palestine which they've renamed as Israel since 1948. It's time for Jews to reflect. If not, they have to kill the rest of the human race, which by many indications is a major driving force behind the COVID bioweapon death genocide now underway in which power Jews like Pfizer's Al Bula and Moderna's Stefan Bancel's pharmaceutical companies are profoundly involved. In any case, Jews must learn to live civilly and cooperatively with the rest of non Jewish humanity.
LoganLancing
Posted - November 23, 2024 at 2:22 PM
Saved - November 23, 2024 at 4:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question why companies like Jaguar and Harley are alienating their consumers. The Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework, initially aimed at promoting sustainable practices, has morphed into a tool for control. It assigns scores to companies based on compliance with certain values, determined by unelected bodies. This shift prioritizes political agendas over customer needs, leading to decisions that may harm profits and consumer interests. Ultimately, ESG seems less about ethical business and more about enforcing conformity and centralizing power.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

Why did Jaguar do the thing? Why did Harley do the thing? Why is every company doing the thing and alienating their consumer bases-- bases they understand more than they understand themselves? Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) A 🧵

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance. It's a framework used to measure a corporation's impact on society and the environment. Sounds harmless, right? Nope.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

The term gained traction from the UN’s "Principles for Responsible Investment" (2006), a global effort to integrate environmental and social concerns into investment decisions. Major financial players like BlackRock and Vanguard popularized it.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

The official reasoning was to ensure "sustainable" business practices, reduce risks tied to climate change, and promote diversity and equity.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

ESG creates a "score" for companies. A high ESG score signals compliance with certain values—carbon reduction, diversity quotas, etc. A low score marks you as a risk. Investors, banks, and governments use this score to decide your access to capital.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

The framework isn't neutral. ESG criteria are set by unelected bodies—global financial institutions, NGOs, and think tanks. They decide which values matter and how they're measured.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

It’s about control. If a corporation doesn’t comply, they face exclusion from financial markets, restricted access to loans, and public smears. It’s extortion dressed up as virtue.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

It shifts corporate priorities. Instead of serving customers and shareholders, companies must serve political agendas. Profits take a backseat to meeting arbitrary ESG targets—often at the expense of employees and consumers. Shareholders give way to "stakeholders."

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

Take energy as an example: Fossil fuel companies are penalized with low ESG scores. This limits their funding and pushes investment toward "green" initiatives, even if those alternatives are unproven, more expensive, less reliable, or less efficient.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

ESG is a Trojan horse. It’s sold as a tool for progress, but it’s a backdoor to enforce ideological conformity across industries. If you control the money and incentives, you control the decisions.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

ESG isn't about making businesses better. It’s about making businesses obedient. The question isn't whether corporations should act ethically—it’s who decides what “ethical” means.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

ESG centralizes power, erodes free markets, and imposes a one-size-fits-all ideology on every business and consumer. Why did Jaguar do the thing? Extortion.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

Jaguar did the thing, knowing full well that they would commit "brand suicide." But Jaguar did the calculus and determined that doing brand suicide was the LESS EXPENSIVE path forward; it was better than taking the ESG hit, which is worse.

@LoganLancing - Logan Lancing

Also see: Corporate Equality Index (CEI), among other wicked instruments of control.

elonmusk
Posted - December 3, 2024 at 1:10 AM
Saved - December 3, 2024 at 2:40 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Shareholders should control company votes, not judges

@Tesla - Tesla

A Delaware judge just overruled a supermajority of shareholders who own Tesla and who voted twice to pay @elonmusk what he’s worth.  The court’s decision is wrong, and we’re going to appeal. This ruling, if not overturned, means that judges and plaintiffs’ lawyers run Delaware companies rather than their rightful owners – the shareholders.

BrianRoemmele
Posted - December 12, 2024 at 9:09 PM
Saved - December 12, 2024 at 11:52 PM

@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele

“The corporation is a person under law” Until it shape-shifts around the world with no passports to evade the absolute criminal damage they knowingly cause. No person could evade like this, but the “corporate person” can. This is not capitalism—it is cronyism. The template: https://t.co/4M3RcDbRwC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Johnson & Johnson created a Texas subsidiary, Red River Talc, with no real business, primarily for bankruptcy purposes. This strategy aims to shield the company from liability related to cancer cases linked to their talc-based baby powder. Despite decades of trust in the product, evidence emerged showing contamination with asbestos, a known carcinogen. Legal battles have ensued, with thousands of women suing J&J for ovarian cancer. The company’s bankruptcy maneuvering could prevent victims from receiving fair compensation and strip their rights to a jury trial. Critics argue this sets a dangerous precedent for corporate accountability. Meanwhile, legislative efforts are underway to address these tactics, but concerns remain about J&J's lobbying influence. Victims like Mary Anne continue to seek justice, insisting the company must be held accountable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oftentimes, the most audacious scandal Speaker 1: Johnson and Johnson and Johnson and Johnson. Speaker 2: Johnson and Johnson. Baby powder and other toll products cause cancer. Speaker 0: Involves the most routine paperwork. In August 2024, Johnson and Johnson created a subsidiary in Texas. They called it Red River Telk. The managers, all based at j and j headquarters in New Jersey. In Texas, no employees, no products, no real business at all. Just paperwork. Red River is registered here. We found the phone number, but when we called Speaker 3: You're seeking to CT Corporation, so we're not Johnson and Johnson. We're seeking corporation, and that's really all I'm going to say. Speaker 0: A month later, it in the world create a subsidiary only to declare it bankrupt? Not once, but 3 times since 2021. So I started to dig into it. The allegations, the documents hidden from the public, and the legal maneuvering. Something bigger emerged. Legal experts believe it's the end game of a decades long strategy that could help J and J escape responsibility for thousands of cancer cases, while thousands of women are left fighting battles on two fronts: against the disease and against a justice system that is failing them. The question is, will J and J strategy work? Speaker 4: If a company can get by with these types of tactics, then the American people are in serious danger. Speaker 5: Most likely, my mother used the powder. That was the big thing back then in the forties fifties. Speaker 6: What's that stuff, Johnson's baby powder? Speaker 5: I have 2 girls, and I also used it on them. And then in turn, they used it on their sons, their children too. Speaker 0: Women like Mary Anne trusted Johnson and Johnson's baby powder for generations. It wasn't just a product. It was a ritual passed down from mother to child. The marketing worked so well that by the late 19 sixties, an internal memo crowned baby powder. The cornerstone of Johnson and Johnson's entire baby business. The product itself was simple. Talc, a mineral mined from the earth. But in 1966, academics published a troubling discovery. Talc had no medicinal value. Worse, it was linked to 3 deaths. The warning made its way through Johnson and Johnson's executive offices. Speaker 6: There was a concern starting in the 19 seventies about asbestos being in talc because of testing done by the FDA. Speaker 0: That's Jessica Dean. She's a plaintiff's attorney. For over a decade, she's been fighting Johnson and Johnson in court over the deadly discovery of asbestos in talc, the mineral used in baby powder. Speaker 6: The problem is is that talc and asbestos often grow together. It has been known for decades to be a common impurity in talc. Speaker 0: Asbestos causes mesothelioma, a cancer that destroys organ linings from within. It's also linked to ovarian cancer. No amount of processing can make it safe. Speaker 6: You're mixing a carcinogen into a powder product designed to be used on children and designed to be used in our homes. And that's the problem at the core of what Johnson and Johnson did. Speaker 0: The government had concerns pretty early. In 1972, they called a meeting to review an FDA study that found asbestos in a huge chunk of products on store shelves. Five members of j and j went along with some other industry groups. And this is where the paper trail picks up. According to the meeting summary, an industry lobbyist pushed to keep the FDA study secret saying it could cause great economic hardship for the companies. J and J said that the government's positive asbestos tests were faulty and that their own tests came back negative. That's more or less the company's position on testing to this day. Speaker 6: They will boast, look at how many tests we've done that don't show asbestos, and they use tests that were underpowered. A simple example I can think of is if you are trying to weigh a feather, you don't use a bathroom scale. It's not gonna show up. You need to have something that is more sensitive. Speaker 0: Coming out of that meeting, the government agreed to let companies self test, and Johnson and Johnson promised to share their own records, swearing they found nothing concerning. Speaker 6: When they made that promise, they had already done testing revealing asbestos in the actual samples from doctor Loane at the FDA. In fact, a third of the fibers in baby powder were tremolite asbestos. There were over 400 samples evidencing asbestos in talc that j and j knew about after they promised our government will give you everything, and we now know they didn't give them any of it. Speaker 0: Jessica isn't the only one alleging this. At this point, it's more or less common knowledge. Real people paid the price. Speaker 5: Never thought that I would have cancer. It was a, you know, it was a shock. First time the tumor was the size of a cantaloupe. Speaker 0: Mary Anne beat ovarian cancer in 2008 only to see it return 4 years later. Speaker 4: One of Speaker 5: the hardest things was I saw Speaker 7: I couldn't see my grandchildren because they were both in school, and I couldn't be around people that might have germs. I didn't see friends. Speaker 4: If you had a Speaker 0: chance to speak directly with Johnson and Johnson executives, what would you ask them? Speaker 5: Why? Why did you lie? Why did you keep it hidden for so long? Speaker 0: The answer may lie in j and j's own documents. Speaker 6: So there's a series of documents, and we even found a videotape of something called baby camp. Speaker 0: One of the documents outlines trust. Speaker 6: And they said the way you get that emotional trust is the mother baby bond is making people when they think of Johnson and Johnson, think about the care mother has for their brand new infant. And that if you can tap into that, you're gonna make bags of money. And that's not something I came up with. That's their visual depiction of a bag of money with the words mother infant bond on it. And look, if they had a safe product, go for it. But once you know concretely 60 years ago that there is an impurity in that powder you're crushing and putting in a bottle to be put on babies and that that impurity has been known to kill people, this becomes horrific. And they built this as the backbone of a company that we all rely on. Speaker 0: For decades, the whole thing went like clockwork. Concerns about telk would surface, and j and j would perfect the art of making them disappear. Speaker 6: They would hire experts that they believe they could control, and that's the word they used in their own documents. They would go after anyone who tried to show the truth and say, let's compromise them. Again, that is the word they used over and over and over again. Speaker 0: But by the late 2000 tens, the strategy fell apart. Cancer victims started winning lawsuits against Johnson and Johnson. And then in 2018, the dam broke. Speaker 2: A Saint Louis jury yesterday awarded $4,100,000,000 in punitive damages and $550,000,000 in compensatory damages to 22 women and their families who claimed that asbestos in the product had caused their ovarian cancer. Speaker 0: But that lawsuit was just the start. Right now, 50,000 women are suing Johnson and Johnson over ovarian cancer from their baby powder. The potential liability, tens, if not 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars. It could be existential even for a giant like J and J, which is why Johnson and Johnson is desperately trying to build an escape route through that Texas company, Red River talc. Speaker 4: It's frightening. If Johnson and Johnson succeeds with this, then this will become the strategy of every company that is facing major liability. Speaker 0: This is Andy Burchfield. He's helping lead the major class action lawsuit against Johnson and Johnson on behalf of ovarian cancer victims, including Mary Anne. What is Red River Telk? Speaker 4: I mean, it is it's just a made for bankruptcy subsidiary. Speaker 0: The subsidiary at the start is part of something called the Texas 2 step. Here, a super rich and profitable company like j and j creates a subsidiary. They take that subsidiary and they register it in Texas. The subsidiary holds everything related to the baby power, the good stuff, the sales and profits, and the bad, the lawsuits. Then using a quirk in Texas law, they split it in 2. Speaker 4: And instead of calling it the division, they call that a merger. It's called the divisive merger. Speaker 0: One company gets all the money and assets. Let's call it good company. The other gets the lawsuits. Let's call that bad company. And then they take that good company and move it back to New Jersey. And the bad company, that's Red River talc. That number in Texas I called, they basically received their mail. And Johnson and Johnson takes that bad Speaker 7: company and declares bankruptcy in Texas. That's what's at Speaker 0: stake here is will in Texas. That's what's at Speaker 4: stake here is will bankruptcy prove to be a an escape hatch for corporate misconduct. Bankruptcy doesn't mean failure. It's a time out. Speaker 0: Everything pauses while you fix what's broken. The catch? Courts watch your every move. Real companies move fast in bankruptcy. They don't want a court telling them how to run their business. But Red River Telk? It's just paper. There's no factories. There's no business to watch over. But when it declares bankruptcy, those cancer lawsuits freeze. And that's exactly what J and J wants. Speaker 4: They can hold, you know, the victims hostage. They just use it as a weapon. Speaker 1: When we're talking about people who have had some sort of asbestos exposure or similar allegations. The claimants are dying. Speaker 0: That's Melissa Jacoby. She's a law professor and expert on America's bankruptcy system. Speaker 1: In the meantime, all those jury trials are being canceled. Speaker 0: J and j claims this is about fairness, that the bankruptcy creates an orderly process for victims. And if you wanna see how fair it really is, just look at what happened at the paper giant Georgia Pacific. In 2017, Georgia Pacific dumped all their asbestos cases into a subsidiary and declared bankruptcy in North Carolina. Speaker 4: Those cancer victims have not received a dime. That case has just been held hostage for since 2017. Speaker 0: Here's the kicker. While the victims waited, many died. Meanwhile, Georgia Pacific has paid their parent company, Koch Industries, $3,000,000,000 in dividends, triple what they offered to victims. Speaker 4: They're using this time as a lever, you know, to, to just force, you know, women and their families into accepting pennies on the dollar, settlement offers. Speaker 0: J and J is offering 9,000,000,000. It sounds like a lot. Until you divide it between the tens of thousands of victims, their lawyers, and anyone who gets sick in the future. Speaker 4: Many of our clients are having to turn to bankruptcy, legitimate bankruptcy because they're of the mounting cost in medical bills. Speaker 0: What's more? The $9,000,000,000 pool of money or bankruptcy trust would be administered by someone on J and J's payroll. Speaker 4: When she's been paid $1,800,000 over the course of these past 3 years for work for J and J, it is troubling. Speaker 0: And crucially, the settlement would cap the company's future liability, which is the end game of this whole scheme. Speaker 4: There may be women who were long term users who do not develop ovarian cancer until 2030 or 2040. Speaker 0: If the Texas 2 step works, future victims lose their constitutional right to a jury trial. Instead of a court, they'd face a bankruptcy trust. Speaker 4: If corporate America can resort to a bankruptcy and strip victims of the right to civil, you know, civil trial, we've we've just taken the US constitution, and we have ripped out the 7th Amendment. Speaker 0: The good news? So far, the bankruptcies have been rejected. First, North Carolina. J and J picked it for easy bankruptcies. The judge said no. You're a New Jersey company. Round 2, New Jersey. But they couldn't explain how they're suddenly broke. 2 tries, 2 faced. And now they're trying in Texas. And the thing is, there's more fishy stuff in this story. We can't cover it all. We asked j and j about talc safety and bankruptcy. If you want to read their full response, go ahead and press pause now. But it's basically 270 words defending their talc and blaming greedy lawyers and a gullible media. But on bankruptcy? Complete silence. And now they're claiming 80% of victims want the $9,000,000,000 settlement deal. But there are credible reports that J and J recruited women with women with cancers that can't be linked to baby powder. In other words, women who wouldn't get a payout from J and J unless they joined in support of this $9,000,000,000 settlement. What seems to be happening, at least in the Johnson and Johnson example and perhaps others, is Speaker 1: a recruitment of claims that are far less rigorously evaluated. Speaker 4: We call it stuffing the ballot box. That's what they're doing. Speaker 1: These are not the ways we would ordinarily treat commercial creditors and bankruptcy. Speaker 0: While J and J continues to push their scheme, there's actually a bipartisan bill that would stop them sitting in Congress right now. Speaker 1: I testified at a senate hearing in 2020 3 about these cases, and there was bipartisan frustration with corporate use of bankruptcy when the companies were very profitable, and their only problem they were trying to solve is capping liability for mass tort. Speaker 4: I am hopeful that, that congress will will intervene here. I'm also deeply concerned because I know I know that j and j has tremendous lobbying power, and they are lobbying for legislation that would go the other way. Speaker 0: Meanwhile, women like Mary Anne are left waiting. Speaker 5: Johnson and Johnson has to be held accountable for what they've done. They're not going bankrupt. And, and as again, that'll set a precedent for other companies to try to get away with all this. And it's, it's not right. It's not morally right. What they're doing. Speaker 0: Thanks for watching. If you like what you saw, please like and subscribe. And if you have ideas for future things we should cover, put them in the comments.
iluminatibot
Posted - December 22, 2024 at 7:35 AM
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 2:18 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"Now we know that BlackRock are in the top 3 shareholders of every corporation." Can anyone stop them from owning the world? https://t.co/tI0chFdXUO

Video Transcript AI Summary
I discovered the ownership structure of BlackRock, which is a major shareholder in many corporations. While Larry Fink founded BlackRock, he doesn't control it. The real control comes from Merrill Lynch, which owns 45% of BlackRock, but this isn't reflected in the top institutional shareholders list. Merrill Lynch is part of Bank of America, which was acquired during the 2008 financial crisis. Warren Buffett, through Berkshire Hathaway, is the top shareholder of Bank of America. Interestingly, despite owning a significant portion of BlackRock, neither Merrill Lynch nor Bank of America has representatives on BlackRock's board. This raises questions about their influence and governance. If anyone has insights into this unusual situation, I’d appreciate the information.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I found out who actually owns BlackRock, but there's something really weird about it. Because by now we know that BlackRock is in the top three shareholders of basically every corporation in America and beyond. And they do this using our money in things like retirement accounts, pension funds, IRAs, chain traded funds, mutual funds. But most people don't actually know who owns and controls BlackRock. We all know that it was founded by Larry Fink, and he's the face of the company, but he does not control it. When you try to find out who does control it, you'll usually find this list, which is the top institutional shareholders. Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street are right at the top just like every other company, but this is not the whole story. Because if you dig deep enough, you'll find out that actually Merrill Lynch owns 45% of BlackRock, and they're considered an insider. So they don't show up on the top institutional holders list. This merger took place in 2,006. So actually, Merrill Lynch controls BlackRock in a big way. But who controls Merrill Lynch? Well, Merrill Lynch is actually a division of Bank of America, because Bank of America bought them out during the 08 financial collapse. So who owns bank of America? Well, nowadays, Warren Buffett is the top shareholder of bank America because he owns Berkshire Hathaway, which is his billionaire investment firm. I'm still not sure what this top one is, the 25%. That's an anomaly, and I cannot corroborate what those shares are, but I found these shares. This is a screenshot from Berkshire Hathaway's 13 f where they tell you all the things they hold. And I totaled up all of these Bank of America shares, and it equals 1,000,000,000 32,000,000 shares. That's 13% of bank of America shares equal to $33,000,000,000 But I also dug in a little bit into where bank of America came from and who founded them. And all modern banks are crazy histories of mergers and acquisitions and banks changing their names and merging with other banks probably for no particular reason. But bank of America traces its roots back in 2 different directions, one of which we're not gonna talk about, and the other one is back to this Italian dude named our Amadeo Giannini, who acquired what was then called Banca de America D'Italia. Sorry for that accent. Over the years, it changed his name to Bank of America. And then in the biggest merger in history, merge with Charlotte based Nation Bank in 1990, what, 1998. So I just thought it was interesting that half of the lineage of Bank of America was founded by this Italian dude that got really into Italian banking back in the early 1900, you know, when, like, there was a certain Italian organization that was doing a lot of things with money back then. I'm sure it was all above board though. I'm, you know, like, obviously. But anyways, back to the weird thing that I can't figure out. Bank of America owns Merrill Lynch, who owns the vast majority of BlackRock, but they don't have anyone on the board as far as I can tell. Usually, the biggest shareholders of a company have representatives on the board that sort of represent their investment. But I've just shown you the whole board of directors of BlackRock, and none of them have any real ties to Merrill Lynch or Bank of America, which seems pretty weird when you own almost half the company to not have any board members. The plot thickens. So two things, if you wanna follow the history of Bank of America down the other trail, you might wind up at a certain family name that you aren't aware of that is really hard to find on the Internet. That'll probably get videos taken down. Total conspiracy theories. And the other thing is if anyone knows more than me or is literate in this or has info about why Merrill Lynch and Bank of America have no representatives on the board of BlackRock. I would love to know. After all, why would you own half of a company and then have no say in what that company is doing? Or how do they have a say? What what's the story here?
elonmusk
Posted - February 1, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 5:04 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Companies are flooding out of Delaware, because the activist chief judge of the Delaware court has no respect for shareholder rights

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨BILL ACKMAN MOVES HIS FIRM FROM DELAWARE TO NEVADA Ackman said top law firms are now recommending Nevada and Texas over Delaware as incorporation hubs. This shift follows a trend set by Elon, who recently moved Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink’s incorporation out of Delaware. The move highlights growing dissatisfaction with Delaware’s corporate governance laws among major business leaders, who see Nevada and Texas as offering more favorable legal environments. Source: Reuters

IanMalcolm84
Posted - March 2, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 2:55 PM

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

Would it be weird if a group making up only 0.2% of the world ran ALL of these companies? What if that group also owned 96% of the media? https://t.co/2bu5MrEd7G

Bobby1_x
Posted - May 15, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Saved - May 16, 2025 at 12:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard manage $20 trillion in assets, influencing corporate decisions through shareholder voting. When individuals invest in ETFs or mutual funds from these firms, they relinquish their voting rights, allowing BSSV to control significant corporate policies and board elections. Despite owning around 15% of many companies, their influence is magnified due to the indifference of other shareholders. This control extends into various sectors of society and politics, shaping corporate ideologies and actions. It's crucial to recognize and challenge this cycle of influence.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard collectively manage $20 TRILLION of assets. The entire GDP of the U.S. is only $23 trillion. Now here's how BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard control you with those assets. First, we need to understand that owning a stock means you own a portion of the corporation the stock is issued based on. And with that ownership comes one very important right: the right to vote your shares to determine what the corporation does. Shareholder voting within a corporation is exactly as it sounds: you vote on certain issues and proposals put forth by the corporation. The more shares you have, the more votes you get — so if you own 30% of all the shares of the company, you get 30% of the votes. Results of votes are generally decided by simple majority. Pretty straight forward, right? Now what gets voted on at these shareholder meetings? The voting determines the major changes to how the corporation will maintain or change the way it interacts with the world around it as well as how the corporation is managed internally. These votes can determine big things, to name a few: - diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives - executive compensation - board of director's policies - the political policies of the corporation However hands down the biggest decision made by the shareholder vote is who sits on the board of directors. The board of directors decides: - the objectives and goals of a company - the management and senior executives of a company - the company policies (including political policies) - brand image and advertising Yes — there is some overlap between what the board of directors does and what the shareholder vote determines. Responsibilities differ from company to company. Now that we have the basics out of the way, how does voting shares of a corporation play in to BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard (I'll call them "BSSV" from now on) controlling you? Let's first look at how each of BSSV's ownerships are structured (all three are basically structured the same). What BSSV generally does is pretty simple: they buy stock shares of a specific company (Apple, Tesla, etc.) and package those stock shares with similar stock shares in to something called an ETF or a Mutual Fund. Then they sell a piece of resulting pool of those stocks to you so you can own a bunch of stocks without having to buy each of them individually (this is simplified but the basics hold true). For instance, let's say you want to buy technology companies but don’t know which specific company you want to buy or you can't afford to buy a bunch of different companies. In that case, BSSV would simplify the process for you by buying stocks of a whole bunch of different tech companies that they then package in to an ETF or Mutual Fund which you can then buy shares in allowing you to get ownership to all those companies at a fraction of the cost and effort! And these bundles can be created with any industry, sector, or with any other group of companies — from tech to oil to the entire S&P 500. So it seems like a win-win, right? You get to own a bundle of a bunch of different stocks you couldn’t otherwise get access to and BSSV gets a very small fee for helping you get that exposure. They seem like such nice guys, right? How on earth could this be sinister? Not so fast — when you buy these stocks through BSSV in ETFs and Mutual funds you give up one very important thing: you give up your right to vote at the shareholder meeting for each of those individual companies. You give up the right to choose the board of directors who determine the course of actions the company will pursue and you give up the right to vote on those political and policy decisions directions the company will take. But most importantly: YOU GIVE THAT VOTING RIGHT TO BSSV. “So what, BSSV can vote a few shares of a company? There must be way more shareholders out there that also vote”. For this, I'd ask you to do an experiment. Pick any major company. Now google who its largest Shareholders are The largest shareholders will almost always include or be composed of BSSV. Of all the stocks in the S&P 500 at least one of the members of BSSV is the largest shareholder in 88% of the companies. “But on average they only collectively own around 15% of most of these companies, that's not 50% control”. True, but a 15% difference in voting for board members or policies where most other shareholders are indifferent or uneducated on the policies (thus their votes are closer to a 50/50 split) is enough to sway almost every item that's voted on. “Well at least the three of them must have differing views? They all must compete for different shareholder vote outcomes, right?” Wrong. The unique thing about BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard is that their own largest shareholders are: Each Other. So they all decide each other's boards of directors and all control each other's shareholder votes. Then once BSSV's own boards are chosen they choose the boards of the companies they control. Now how is this control actually exerted? What are the manifestations of it that actually impact us? I'll keep this succinct so this doesn't run too long but corporations exert control over our society in a number of ways. On the social front this means BSSV can control almost every intersection of our lives with corporations. Our news, our social media, our financial institutions, our cinema and television, our retailers, our clothing stores, and even our food are all subservient to BSSV and the boards of directors they appoint. In the political landscape this control can be exerted through campaign contributions, lobbying, PACS, issue advocacy, regulatory capture, think tanks, revolving doors, trade associations, policy development, and campaign advertising amongst others (to name a few). This is also why every corporation appears to be move in lock-step in their support of things like ESG investing, Black Lives Matter, and other social causes: because behind the scenes BSSV purposefully elects boards that champion their values and beget their interests. The players on each board are different but their ideologies are the same…because their ideologies are BSSV's ideology. For many years now BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard have controlled almost every aspect of our lives without us knowing. It's time to break that cycle.

newstart_2024
Posted - July 29, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Saved - July 30, 2025 at 4:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered a troubling reality: 88% of S&P 500 companies are dominated by BlackRock, Vanguard, or State Street, creating a corporate oligarchy. These firms influence defense, pharma, and education, controlling $10 trillion in assets—more than the GDPs of all but the US and China. The military-industrial complex is tightly held by five companies, profiting from war. We need to break these monopolies, demand transparency, and decentralize power to combat this corporate colonialism. If we don’t act, unelected billionaires will continue to dictate our world.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

The Hidden Monopoly Controlling America (And the World) 88% of S&P 500 companies have BlackRock, Vanguard, or State Street as their largest shareholder. That’s not capitalism—that’s a corporate oligarchy. 🔍 Follow the Money: - Defense contractors? Raytheon, Boeing, Lockheed Martin—top shareholders are the same Big Three. - Pharma? Media? Education? Same players, same influence. - $10 TRILLION in assets—only US & China have bigger GDPs than BlackRock alone. 💣 The Military-Industrial Complex: - 5 companies control defense contracting. - $744 BILLION in military spending—more than the next 10 nations combined. - More war = more profit. Who really dictates foreign policy? 🌐 Global Control: - ESG mandates—forcing ideologies on corporations. - $70 TRILLION in assets under their influence. - Ukraine’s $400B "rebuild"? Handed to BlackRock & JPMorgan. 🤔 The Real Power Players: They can fire CEOs, replace boards, and shape policy—while monopolizing markets far beyond legal limits. (Apple’s 60% iPhone share? No FTC action.) ⚔️ How Do We Fight Back? 1. Break the monopolies—enforce antitrust laws. 2. Demand transparency—follow the money in media, pharma, and defense. 3. Decentralize power—support competition, not corporate tyranny. This isn’t conspiracy—it’s corporate colonialism. If we don’t act, unelected billionaires will keep ruling the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are allegedly running everything, with these three being the largest shareholders in 88% of S&P 500 companies. They heavily influence defense contracts; BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are top shareholders in Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing. The US spends $744 billion on its military, with defense spending accounting for 13% of GDP, more than the next 10 countries combined. BlackRock has $10 trillion in assets under management, more than the GDP of every country except the US and China. BlackRock influenced 31 signers to participate with ESG, totaling $70 trillion of assets under management. BlackRock and Chase are helping rebuild Ukraine with a $400 billion contract. The speaker questions how to fight this power, suggesting that these companies have enough control to fire boards and replace CEOs. With 88% of S&P 500 companies controlled, it is argued that this constitutes a monopoly, exceeding the 50% threshold. The speaker suggests that defense contractors profit from wars and people dying. They propose breaking apart these companies to foster competition, as the speaker believes Larry Fink is the real commander in chief.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, Larry Fink, Soros, State Street, you know, Vanguard, BlackRock. How much have you looked at what they're doing and how what their ties are? I've looked at it. Yeah? Yeah. They're pretty much running everything. Yeah. Yeah. S and P 500, you know, the number that 88% of the companies on S and P 500, 88% of them, the largest shareholder of those companies is either State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard. 88% of them. Okay? And then you see their influence in defense contracts. Okay? So we went through a deal. I'm like, let me see if this these guys, this ESG, Larry Fink, Vanguard, State Street, if they have any influence on military contract, defense contract. If you Google the largest shareholder for Raytheon, three out of the four top shareholders of Raytheon, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. It could be top three with Raytheon, but I think it's three out of four. If you go look up General Dynamics, if you go look up Boeing, if you go look up, you know, Northrop Grumman. Okay? And then you work backwards and you say, okay, how much money is that in the in in what these guys are doing? You'll find our you know, the amount of money we spent in our military, $744,000,000,000 on how much we're making from defense, but you'll see some numbers saying last year is 13% of our GDP, which is around $850,000,000,000. That's more than the next 10 combined. We gave more money to Ukraine than Russia spent on their military last year. And when you look at these contracts, then you're like, okay, Fink is there, these guys are there. Okay. Let's go look at Hollywood. Same thing you see there. Let's go look at pharmaceutical. Let's go look at this. And you're like, wait a minute. These guys essentially have a monopoly. Well, how big is BlackRock? $10,000,000,000,000. How big is $10,000,000,000,000? Only two countries have a bigger GDP than what BlackRock has, assets under management. US and China. That's how big BlackRock is. So then they went and they started getting all these other guys to sign on and say, hey. We want you to participate with the same thing as what would ESG. And they ended up having, I think, they had 31 signers. I think 2022, they got 60 something signers for a total of $70,000,000,000,000 of assets under management that they're controlling. So now they're controlling other places. And just recently, if you saw the rebuilding of Ukraine did you see this contract? Rebuilding of Ukraine, $400,000,000,000 contract. BlackRock and Chase is helping rebuild Ukraine. And then, you know, okay. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but what the hell is going on here? They have that much control to get everybody to do what they want them to do? Yes. So Dylan Mulvaney, who cares? Why? Bud Light. How does that tie up? You got the DEI, the HRC, the human rights, and all this stuff. And then you go even deeper, which is even the crazier part with, you know, the the education, schools, like, you know, the biggest union we have in America, I think it's national education something. NEA is the largest union we have. 3,000,000 teachers are part of that union. And and you look at that and you go deeper and that would open society and who's funding it, who's the money behind these organizations, comes back. Soros, Soros, Soros. How do you feel about the kind of power they have right now to fight against them? Because this isn't like a billionaire can come out and say, I'm going go up against these guys. They don't have a little bit of money. A billionaire to these guys is nothing. They got the kind of control that can make companies fire boards. They can replace CEOs. They can replace leaders if they don't like. They have their hands so much into it where many times when people say they, the people of power, the people of power, I'm kind of like who are the people of power? Are you convinced these guys are really running the world or what do you think about what some of these bigger companies are doing like State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock? Well, they certainly have massive amounts of influence. What do you think they're doing? It's it's the question is how do you fight it? Like, for example, the way we fight mainstream is by what? The show that we do. And we have to be patient. It's going to take two, three, four, five, ten, twenty years. Now you have some influence. Right? Okay. We can fight. There is an actual strategy on how to fight that. No problem. You got a kid in school who's a bully. He's bigger than you. He keeps bullying you. You have a strategy on how to beat the guy. You take a year, jujitsu two years, this, this, that. Boom. One fight, he knows, I'm never gonna touch yo again. Screw this thing. I'm not doing this no more. Right? There is a play to it. When you have this much, Joe, 88% of S and P 500 companies, that is a form of a monopoly. If I'm a president, whether it's a Trump or whoever else goes out there and does it, Our monopoly law in America is 50%. They say 50%. Like if you tie and said, at what point is a 50%? I've done calls with the FTC. Like we had one of our guys technology we were using. The FTC called and said, hey, we want to have a call with you because they're thinking about buying this other technology company and we're worried it's going to be a monopoly. So we had the call. Okay? At the end of the call with us, a bunch of different people, we said we love their product, we love their product. That deal didn't end up happening. K? The monopoly law. Some of these guys are influencing it. But they say 50% is a monopoly law. Do you know how many people in America have an iPhone versus droid? You know what the numbers market shares in America with iPhones? I think it's like 60. 58. 60%. That is already a monopoly. But who's knocking on the door of Apple? Tim Cook said, hey, Tim. You got 58%. That's breaking a monopoly law. Nobody is. I think someone's gotta break apart. You know, in 1993, I don't know which senator it was, they these guys that were trying to get the defense contractors to be better at the pricing, what they were charging because they were overcharging DOD and DOD people don't know what the hell is going on. They're like, yeah, okay. How much $68,000,000 do it? $1,200,000,000 do it. I'm not going to over negotiate the money. They took 51 defense companies and they brought it down to only five. It's only five companies right now when you want to buy anything. Think about that. So defense contractors is five. We know how these guys make money. Earlier, you know, I was asking you a question, why do you think vaccine and you're Pat, that's how they make their money. Right? I mean, if a if you and I run a hotel, rooms are empty, we're not making money. We need people to stay in the rooms. If you and I are running hospital, we need people on the beds to make money. Yeah. If there's no people on the beds, we ain't making money. If these five contractors are fighting for $744,000,000,000, what do they want more of? Wars. They want more people dying. You know the Papa John saying, better ingredients, better pizza, Papa John's. You know, these guys is more wars, more people dying, more profits, defense contractors. Right? That's a valid concern that I have because behind closed doors, this whole military industrial complex, when you look at the numbers, whoever becomes the president, unfortunately, this guy's an anti establishment president. Good. Unfortunately, if you're an anti establishment president, everyone's gonna come after you, especially these military defense contractors. So if a president got up and said, if I'm gonna be the president, here's what we're gonna be doing. We have to look at all the contracts. You can't overcharge us. We have to open it up. You have to sell some of your companies. You have to let them be independent again. You have to do this. You have to let them go public separate, whatever way you gotta break them apart to have competition again because we don't have that today. You know? So that is a major concern where we say we have a commander in chief, but really the commander in chief is Larry Fink today.
karma44921039
Posted - August 6, 2025 at 8:45 AM
Saved - August 7, 2025 at 2:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A federal judge in Texas has ruled that BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street can be sued for allegedly forming an investment cartel to control U.S. energy markets. The lawsuit claims they purchased coal companies to shut them down, enforced green energy mandates, raised prices, and promoted unvoted ESG policies. Their influence extends to owning Tyler Tech, major shares in Amazon and Costco, and stakes in utilities like Delmarva Power. This situation reveals a profit scheme involving land, utilities, and politics, now validated by a federal ruling.

@karma44921039 - karma

🚨 A FEDERAL JUDGE in Texas just ruled that BlackRock, Vanguard, & State Street CAN BE SUED for forming an INVESTMENT CARTEL to CONTROL U.S. ENERGY MARKETS. The lawsuit says they bought coal companies just to shut them down, forced green energy mandates, jacked up prices, & pushed ESG policies no one voted for. And it goes deeper: They own Tyler Tech (behind corrupt reassessments). Major shareholders in Amazon & Costco (huge tax breaks while ours went up). Indirectly own Delmarva Power through Exelon (skyrocketing bills). Own NVR/Ryan Homes (buying farmland, pushing unaffordable developments). Heavy stake in Chesapeake Utilities & Artesian Water (monopolies). It’s a TRIANGLE PROFIT SCHEME: LAND, UTILITIES, POLITICS — all controlled by the same few players. What they once called a CONSPIRACY is now backed by a FEDERAL RULING.

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street lost a major court ruling in Texas, where a federal judge agreed they can be sued for allegedly forming an investment cartel to control US energy markets. The lawsuit claims they bought coal companies to shut them down, forcing green energy initiatives and raising prices through ESG policies. These companies also allegedly have influence in Delaware. BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street own Tyler Technologies, which is behind corrupt reassessments, and are major shareholders in Amazon and Costco, who received tax decreases. They indirectly own Delmarva Power through Exelon, and power bills are rising due to ESG policies. They also own Ryan Homes indirectly through NVR Homes, buying residential and farmland for developments. Additionally, they have major ownership in Chesapeake Utilities, impacting overdevelopment, utility monopolies, and artesian water. The speaker alleges a profit scheme involving politicians and urges viewers to research these claims.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I started talking about how BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street control and run Delaware, and all of the haters wanted to call me a conspiracy theorist at the mere mention of these companies. However, I need to formally request you guys start referring to me as a spoiler alertist instead. Because based off this court ruling in Texas today of the state of Texas versus BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, I am onto something. Let me break it down for you. BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street just lost a major court ruling today in federal court, and a federal judge in Texas agreed that they can be sued. The lawsuit says that they formed an investment cartel to control US energy markets. They allegedly bought up coal companies just to shut them down and force green energy initiatives, all while jacking up prices and pushing ESG policies that nobody voted for. If you don't know what an ESG policy is, it's environmental, social, and governance. Now pause because this is exactly what I've been exposing here in Delaware. Those three major key players, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, they own Tyler Technologies who is behind the corrupt reassessments. There are major shareholders in Amazon and Costco, both of who received insane tax decreases while the rest of us got jacked. They indirectly own Delmarva Power through ownership in Exelon, the parent company to Delmarva Power, and our power bills and our energy bills have been skyrocketing due to ESG policies here in Delaware due to green energy initiatives that our lawmakers passed knowing there was no possible way for us to meet them here in Delaware. We simply do not have the land to do so. They own Ryan Homes indirectly through their major ownership in NVR Homes, which is the parent company to Ryan Homes. So they've been going around. They've been buying all the residential land and the farmland and turning into properties and developments that nobody can afford. They have a major ownership in Chesapeake utilities. You guys, overdevelopment of the land, utility monopolies, and artesian water. Yep. You probably guessed it. And then you have some big name politicians who I cannot name yet until I have my receipts to back what I'm saying, but it all is full circle, guys. It's all a triangle profit scheme. We are free range humans on a tax farm. BlackRock and Vanguard are major owners in every single one of the things I just mentioned. They called it a conspiracy, but now it's a federal ruling. This wasn't a prediction. This was a spoiler alert. For legal reasons, this is, of course, all allegedly and for entertainment purposes only. I don't wanna tell you what to think. I want you to tell me what you think. And I've given you the companies. I've given you the names. I've given you the federal court ruling. Go look it up, fact check me, and come back. And tag a Delaware resident because we cannot let the same thing happen in our state.
shawnchauhan1
Posted - September 5, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Saved - September 5, 2025 at 1:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump's recent tech dinner was less about networking and more about billionaires influencing American policy, with notable figures like Gates and Zuckerberg pledging loyalty for favorable terms. Five Indian CEOs attended while their country faced tariffs, signaling a shift in allegiance. Musk's absence raised questions about his political stance. The event underscored a troubling trend where democracy seems to be sold to the highest bidders, as these tech titans secure their interests amid rising economic tensions, leaving regular people to bear the consequences.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

Trump's tech dinner wasn't networking. It was a $1+ trillion auction where billionaires bought American policy. All while 5 Indian CEOs sat at the table as their homeland faces 50% tariffs. The most expensive meal in political history just redrew global power lines 🧵

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

Over 30 tech titans crammed into the White House State Dining Room. Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Tim Cook all pledging loyalty. Apple: $600 billion. Google: $250 billion. Microsoft: $80 billion annually. Elon Musk didn't show. The world's richest man snubbed Trump.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

Zuckerberg called it "inspiring." Gates praised Trump's vision. The same billionaires who once criticized him now kiss the ring for favorable policies. Meta's CEO went from Trump ban to Trump fan. What changed? Power did.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Well, thanks for for hosting us, and this is quite a group to get together. It's a great honor to, to work here at the White House and to to work for you. Very grateful for your administration's support. We look forward to working together, and thanks for your leadership. We're so grateful for that support. Thank you so much, obviously, for bringing us all together and the policies, that you have put in place. I wanna thank you for including me this evening. It's incredible to be among everyone here, particularly you and the first lady. I also want to thank you for helping American companies around the world. First of all, to echo the comments of Tim and others, thank you so much for getting us all together, and thank you for being such a pro business, pro innovation president. Thank you for everything you're doing. Thank you for incredible leadership, including getting this group together.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mark, would you like to say a few words about the company? Well, thanks for for hosting us, and this is quite a group to get together. Thank you, mister president. It's a great honor to, to work here at the White House and to to work for you. Very grateful for your administration's support. We look forward to working together, and thanks for your leadership. We're so grateful for that support. Thank you so much, obviously, for bringing us all together and the policies, that you have put in place. Thank you very much. And, also, I wanted to thank, madam first lady for hosting. I wanna thank you for including me this evening. It's incredible to be among everyone here, particularly you and the first lady. I also want to thank you for helping American companies around the world. First of all, to echo the comments of Tim and others, thank you so much for getting us all together, and thank you for being such a pro business, pro innovation president. Thank you. Thank you for everything you're doing. Thank you for incredible leadership, including getting this group together. Thank you, Bill. That is very nice.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

Five Indian-origin CEOs attended: - Satya Nadella (Microsoft) - Sundar Pichai (Google) - Sanjay Mehrotra (Micron) - Vivek Ranadivé (TIBCO) - Shyam Sankar (Palantir). Combined net worth: $50+ billion. Their homeland's response? Trending while facing economic warfare.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

Trump announced 50% tariffs on Indian imports just days before this dinner. $200 billion in bilateral trade at risk. Then he invites India's top business leaders to wine and dine. Message received: Your loyalty belongs to America now, not your birthplace.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

Musk's absence screams volumes. Gates shows up. Zuckerberg shows up. Cook shows up. But Tesla's CEO sends a representative while competitors pledge hundreds of billions. Speculation: Falling out over space contracts? Regulatory battles? Or is Musk building his own political machine?

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

This isn't capitalism - it's oligarchy with appetizers. Gates and Zuckerberg pledging billion-dollar investments behind closed doors while Congress debates budgets. American democracy just got outsourced to Silicon Valley's highest bidders.

Video Transcript AI Summary
all of the companies here are building just making huge investments in in the country in order to build out data centers and infrastructure to power the next wave of innovation. "How much are you spending, would you say, over the next few years?" "Oh, gosh. I mean, I think it's probably gonna be something like, I don't know, at least $600,000,000,000 through '28 in The US. Yeah. It's a lot." "It's it's significant. That's a lot." "Thank you, Mark. It's great to have you. Thank you."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, thanks for for hosting us. And this is quite a group to get together. And, you know, I think, you know, all of the companies here are building just making huge investments in in the country in order to build out data centers and infrastructure to power the next wave of innovation. So it's you know, we don't often get together as as the the the CEOs of the different companies, but it's it's good to see everyone. How much are you spending, would you say, over the next few years? Oh, gosh. I mean, I think it's probably gonna be something like, I don't know, at least $600,000,000,000 through '28 in The US. Yeah. It's a lot. No. It's it's significant. That's a lot. Thank you, Mark. It's great to have you. Thank you.
Video Transcript AI Summary
President praises Tim Cook and Apple, calling it a “little company called Apple” and thanking him for a major investment in the United States, including key manufacturing and helping American companies worldwide. Cook expresses gratitude for the evening and the administration's focus on innovation. He thanks the first lady for focusing on education: “There's nothing more important than education. It is the great equalizer and always will be.” He adds that, “we all believe in the power of technology to improve people's lives.” The president asks how much Apple will invest in the United States. Cook replies, “600,000,000,000.” The host says, “600,000,000,000. Alright. It's a lot of jobs,” and Cook responds, “We're very proud to do it.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tim Cook, you've done an incredible job with Apple, little company called Apple. Speaker 1: Thank you, mister president. Speaker 0: Very, very few people have been able to do what you've done. Congratulations, Speaker 1: please. Thank you, sir. That means a lot to me. I wanna thank you for including me this evening. It's incredible to be among everyone here, particularly you and the first lady. I've always enjoyed having dinner and interacting. I want to thank you for setting the tone such that we could make a major investment in The United States and have some key manufacturing, advanced manufacturing here. I think that says a lot about your focus and your leadership and your focus on innovation. I also want to thank you for helping American companies around the world. This is a very key key thing, and I really enjoy working with your administration on on those topics as well because I think they're so important to the country. I wanna thank the first lady for focusing on education. There's nothing more important than education. It is the great equalizer and always will be. And so thank you so much for including me. We're all we are all different in some ways, but we all believe in the power of technology to improve people's lives. And that that is the thing that that binds us all together. Speaker 0: And, Tim, how much money will Apple be investing in The United States? Because I know it's a very lot and and it's, you know, you were elsewhere and now you're really coming home in a big way. How much money will you be investing? Speaker 1: 600,000,000,000. Speaker 0: 600,000,000,000. Alright. It's a lot of jobs. Speaker 1: We're very proud to do it. Speaker 0: That's great. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: Appreciate it. Thank you, sir.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

The timing is surgical. China's tech dominance threatens American supremacy. Solution? Lock in loyalty through massive domestic investments. Gates' foundation influence, Zuckerberg's AI push, Cook's manufacturing - all now tied to American interests.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

Here's the kicker: Every major AI breakthrough, cloud platform, and semiconductor advance just got tied to American soil. - OpenAI's $100B Stargate project. - Microsoft's data center empire. - Meta's AI infrastructure. China's worst nightmare materialized over steak and lobster.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

But regular people pay the price. AI automation will displace millions while Gates, Zuckerberg, and Cook profit. Indian consumers face higher gadget prices from tariffs. American workers compete with immigrants these very companies import. The elite feast while others starve.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

The $600+ billion in pledges isn't investment - it's insurance. Insurance against antitrust breakups. Against regulatory oversight. Gates buying influence, Zuckerberg buying protection, Cook buying market access. These billionaires just bought themselves a government protection racket.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

While everyone celebrates "job creation" and "innovation," democracy just got sold to the highest bidders. Gates, Zuckerberg, and 28 other billionaires shaped policy without a single vote cast. Five Indian CEOs chose American interests over Indian ones. This is oligarchy, not governance.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

I’m Shawn, a Generative AI Consultant passionate about building AI-driven solutions. I write about AI, startups, and the future of work.

@shawnchauhan1 - Shawn Chauhan

If you found these insights valuable: Sign up for my free AI newsletter! https://the-unbound-ai.beehiiv.com/subscribe

The Unbound AI Get the inside scoop on the AI revolution. Learn about cutting-edge innovations that are shaping the future, long before anyone else. the-unbound-ai.beehiiv.com
newstart_2024
Posted - September 17, 2025 at 12:35 PM
Saved - September 18, 2025 at 4:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The mask is off. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink openly admits to a global business model that leverages access and influence over governments before they assume power. He outlines a strategy to control retirement funds worldwide, positioning BlackRock as a crucial partner while courting political candidates as financiers rather than constituents. Now, as co-chairman of the World Economic Forum, his influence will grow. This fusion of mega-finance, global governance, and political pre-selection poses a significant threat to national sovereignty and democratic integrity. It’s not investment; it’s infiltration.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

The mask is off. In a stunning admission, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink boasts of a global business model built on unprecedented access and influence over the highest levels of government—before they even take power. His words reveal a chilling blueprint: leverage control over the retirement funds of nations (from Mexico to Japan to the UK) to position BlackRock as an indispensable "partner." Then, systematically court political candidates, not as a constituent, but as a global financier securing access and influence regardless of who wins. Now, as a new co-chairman of the World Economic Forum, Fink’s influence is set to be formalized and amplified. This isn't conspiracy theory; it's a corporate leader openly describing a strategy to shape policy and governance from the top down. The fusion of mega-finance (BlackRock), globalist governance (WEF), and political pre-selection is the defining threat to national sovereignty and democratic integrity in our time. This is the unelected engine of the "stakeholder capitalism" machine. It’s not investment. It’s infiltration.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're heavily involved in most countries' retirement, whether it's in Mexico. We're the largest third non Mexican, not a foray retirement manager. We're the largest retirement manager, non Japanese in Japan. You know, we're the largest retirement manager in The UK, including the domestics. And so having that position, it's all about long term issues, but it's things that you can't replicate because it's based on years of relationships and trust. Then I do go out of my way when there's somebody who's new in their role, a new prime minister. Will spend time, Generally what I try to do is spend time before they win and meet the candidate. So whether it's in Mexico, spending time with Claudia before she won, or spending time with Kyrstarma. It's just spending time with them and just saying you have access to whatever information you need.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, talk to a lot of people, but I do believe because of the business model of who and what we are, our reach. We're heavily involved in most countries' retirement, whether it's in Mexico. We're the largest third non Mexican, not a foray retirement manager. We're the largest retirement manager, non Japanese in Japan. You know, we're the largest retirement manager in The UK, including the domestics. And so having that position, it's all about long term issues, but it's things that you can't replicate because it's based on years of relationships and trust. Then I do go out of my way when there's somebody who's new in their role, a new prime minister. Will spend time, Generally what I try to do is spend time before they win and meet the candidate. So whether it's in Mexico, spending time with Claudia before she won, or spending time with Kyrstarma. It's just spending time with them and just saying you have access to whatever information you need.
View Full Interactive Feed