reSee.it - Related Post Feed

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Did governments and public health know that the vax doesn't stop covid transmission? If so, why did they push mandates and vax discrimination anyway? Can we trust these institutions again? Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) has answers!

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

Where were these wild allegations against Russell Brand before he took a stand against the establishment? They did the same thing to Elon Musk when he bought Twitter and promised free speech. Thread below 🧵 https://t.co/yvPCrcZlCR

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

2016 - Trump runs for president, is accused of affair. https://t.co/aLFf1SfWKo

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

2021 - Joe Rogan talks about Ivermectin - Spotify threatens to cancel his Podcast, media pushes to deplatform him in favor of the vaccines which Fauci now admits causes myocarditis. https://t.co/Z6yrX36hHs

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

2022 - Elon Musk says he'll buy Twitter to free speech, is accused of sexual misconduct. https://t.co/ZBmQDyQV93

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

Russell Brand gets sober, gets out of Hollywood, starts a family, and begins to speak out against the vaccines and establishment gets accused of sexual assault from 2006. https://t.co/gwb1aOZEsc

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

Anytime someone stands up, they use the establishment media in an attempt to control or cancel them. Notice a pattern yet?

@Inversionism - Inversionism

This is why they're going after Russell Brand. He understands that the left/right paradigm is a trap meant to placate and divide us. Both sides are propagandistic and manipulative. Both sides are captured like shown in Project Mockingbird. And both sides use the MSM to manufacture consent and create false perceptions of realities and the authorities within it. The sooner we all realize we're being manipulated on every front, the quicker we can all stand above it and realize it's purely just the people vs the elite.

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Channel 4 and 'Times' Russell Brand Hit-Piece Exposed: Right & Left Wing British Media Unite to Smear Alternative Voices Russel Brand is a well known ALTERNATIVE media personality. He doesn’t follow or propagate the mainstream narrative. An Axis of MSM has colluded to DESTROY @rustyrockets reputation because he poses an existential threat to them. When he led a hedonistic lifestyle, mainstream media promoted and broadcast his stereotypically liberal behaviour. At that time they had no issue. But decades later, after he left that lifestyle, and agitated MSM - both the Right and Left wing branches, they have manufactured weak allegations out of his past to take him out. They did the same with @Cobratate and they will do the same again. The irony is that liberal leftist society promotes hedonism and then when the time is right use that very behaviour to cancel the person. Welcome to 2023 The media has assumed upon itself the role of prosecutor, judge and jury with no regard for justice and due process. Let’s do a FORENSIC analysis into The Times and Channel 4 Hit Piece to see the strength of these claims. Let’s look at the ‘evidence’. /1

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

They contacted 100s of people in order to find dirt on Russell Brand. Simply put the article and Dispatches documentary were the result of years of digging up any woman that would give the MSM the story they wanted. They frankly admit they “scrutinised Brand’s books and interviews, and watched and listened to hundreds of hours of his shows on the BBC, Channel 4 and YouTube to corroborate allegations.” Imagine speaking to so many people: during the height of his fame. Brand claims to have slept with 80 women a month. And yet they manage to find only 4 women, all of whom were actually in relationship with Brand. How convenient... So this is the game; you can have a relationship with someone & decades later a woman can claim one of the encounters during the middle of it was not consensual. /2

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Here is a video featuring a woman confirming that Brand was indeed kind to her and everything between them was consensual. However, her account didn't align with the mainstream media narrative, so it was excluded from the documentary. This is one of the many individuals who were contacted among the hundreds. /3

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

So for some reason, according to their argument, Brand exhibits a pattern where all the 'raped' women admit they were ALREADY in sexual relationships with him. Why this bizzare pattern of exclusively raping women he's already having non- rape sexual relationships with? That’s the game. With this methodology you can take any man out. /4

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

The first woman who claimed he raped her presented the following as evidence. She asserts he apologized, but the nature of the apology isn’t what is claimed by The Times i.e. rape. It's evident that the apology was related to not using a condom during their encounter. She also mentioned getting tested for any potential consequences due to not using protection. In this scenario, not using a condom is equated to rape. Its not clear whether they used condoms every time or not in their seemingly numerous sexual encounters but whether 'stealthing' is the same as rape is extremely contentious...but of course feminists seek to weaponise any heterosexual encounter. /5

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Recall that 'stealthing' was the EXACT SAME ACCUSATION USED AGAINST JULIAN ASSANGE BY ACCUSERS. Coincidence I'm sure. This case highlights a consequence of the MeToo movement: The redefinition of rape to include any and everything and trivialising actual rape. Also if you download the image and blow it to full size you notice that the text looks different and there is a faint line below the words “when a woman say NO..” The left side of the blue comment appears to be smudged and not a clearly defined line. It appears the message has been tampered with. We shall see. In any case, it's not a proof of rape even if genuine. /6

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Initially the article claims that “Brand raped her against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She was treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day” Then later in the article it is clear she was in a CONSENSUAL relationship with Brand. A screenshot of messages after the alleged encounter suggests that she was upset that Brand did not use a condom. “When a girl say[s] NO it means no….Last time U asked me condom or no condom. When I say condom that doesn’t mean it [is] optional.” /7

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

This is not a new phenomenon where women decide AFTER THE FACT that consensual sex with a celebrity is rape. Not wearing a condom does NOT equate to rape. In the message she does not claim rape. And Brand is still in communication with her by the 5th of August. We do not know if all messages were preserved since why is there a random message 1 month and 5 days later? /8

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

What we know is that when she came to Brand's home that day, she was in a sexual relationship with him and allegedly he asked for a threesome. Did the ‘journalists’ try to track this other individual to corroborate events? It appears not. Also of note is the duplicitous prudery in the article since the media are complicit in encouraging promiscuity such as open relationships and orgies, here is a recent example from the Times. At the same time as celebrating orgies, lesbianism, open relationships & threesomes as being empowering and liberating for women, they now criticise Brand for empowering women and himself to engage in these same sexual practices. Teenage sexuality itself is celebrated voyeuristically in shows like 'The White Lotus', 'Sex Education', 'Euphoria' and Channel 4's own 'Skins' which gleefully depicted teenage sexuality. Yet the same people now suddenly find themselves in the position of puritans disapproving of even sexual activity at legal age. 'Heartstopper' celebrates teenage homosexual activity & is a massive hit. & where were 'The Times' and Channel 4 when age gap gay sex was glamorised - between teachers and pupils no less - in the Oscar winning movie 'Call Me By Your Name?' and many others? /9

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

The second woman claims that the relationship was non-consensual because she was 16. So despite this being the legal age of consent, this is now considered 'sort of' rape. In a society that encourages sexual activity at a young age and where minors engage in relationships, it's paradoxical that they label legal sex as rape based solely on age. The implied accusation of pedophilia doesn't align with the actual circumstances, showing an attempt to redefine the age of consent to misconstrue Brand's actions. Yet, these are the EXACT SAME organisations (The Times, Channel 4) who demanded and lobbied for the age of consent be constantly lowered until it was 16 and to include homosexual activity including anal penetrative intercourse. /10

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

The Times now make a laughable attempt to belay the age of consent. Note the law in the UK allows a 16 year old to have a consensual relation and Alice admits that Brand checked to ensure she was 16 at the time of their consensual relationship. Hardly behaviour of a predatory nature right? The reader is told that Alice “has decided to speak out because she now believes that she was too young to be able to consent to a relationship with an adult man, and that the law should be changed to protect those under 18.” Well let’s delve into the media’s acceptance, condoning and even promoting large age differences and literal paedophilia. /11

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

This appears to be a consistent pattern observed in their approach to undermine or remove men they harbor animosity towards or perceive as standing in the way of their objectives. A comparable strategy was employed against @cobratate, where they made allegations of involvement with a 16-year-old. I had to debunk all the unsubstantiated claims and weaknesses in their argument. /12

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Here is an example of Stephen Fry marrying Elliot Spencer, who is 30 years younger than him. There is no issue here, as Fry is praised by the establishment. /13 https://t.co/HwZbKs0wdd

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Here is another example of Sarah Paulson marrying Holland Taylor, who is 32 years older than her. However, when women do it, there is no issue or problem. This age gap concern is only brought up to criticize men. /14 https://t.co/N69e5cKMQq

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

But let us be clear their issue is only when they want to take a MAN out and it’s exclusive to only men. They promote and overlook immoral behaviour. Here for example is Cher with a boyfriend who is 40 years younger than her. /15 https://t.co/x4WeyvNlCm

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Here is another example: Aaron Taylor-Johnson was 18 when he dated Sam Taylor-Wood, who was 42. In this case, despite him being a teenager and the significant age difference, it seems not to matter. /16 https://t.co/4r94xnpTwf

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Similarly, Emmanuel Macron met his teacher when he was 15 years old, while she was 39. His parents attempted to intervene, worried that he might be vulnerable to exploitation. This situation could be viewed as clear pedophilia, yet it went unquestioned when a boy was involved. Now, he's the president, and she's accepted as his wife. Read the attached image, they are actually crediting her raping him for his success. So for them, it was only because she molested him did he become a good public speaker. I guess, according to them, you can teach acting and other skills through rape too. /17

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

I mean this is not surprising because liberals in particular love paedophilia: “De Beauvoir was a pedophile who groomed minors. She also wanted to legalise Pedophilia. Like Ghislaine Maxwell & Jeffrey Epstein, both De Beauvoir & Jean-Paul Sartre developed a pattern, which they called the "trio", in which Beauvoir seduced his students and then passed them on to Sartre." But The Times gives her repeated hagiographies… /18 https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/1613926009723658241?s=48

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Here is The Times giving a free ride to an actual advocate of pedophilia. Peter Tatchell is quoted as suggesting that a 9-year-old was capable of consenting to and deriving pleasure from engaging in sexual activities with an adult man. /19 https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/1666898114802769954?s=48

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

And here is where the Times platform Tatchell. There is no mention at all about his comments that 9 year olds can consent to sex. Now compare with massive attack they published about Brand...who had sex with a 16yr old, who is of legal age. /20 https://t.co/V65F52zr60

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Let's consider the case of Coco Chanel. Recent revelations about her involvement in espionage for the Nazis were met with...an exhibition funded by taxpayers, portraying her in a favorable light. It seems some individuals are perceived as beyond reproach. /21 https://t.co/lib0nJZY0E

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

The Times praises an anti-Semite who collaborated with the Nazis, yet in the days later, they orchestrated a major attack on Russell Brand. /22 https://t.co/ejgRFHX9cC

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

It's evident that these actions are contradictory, but the liberal press seems inclined to excuse such behavior for their favorites. Meanwhile, Brand is hanged. /23 https://t.co/4Jx7b2DzMc

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Moving back to that woman. And how did the relationship end with her? Was it after the alleged allegation of rape? No “The relationship ended when Brand invited her over one day, and she arrived to find another woman in his bed. “I was so angry, and I said to him, ‘Why would you do this to me? This is so humiliating.’” Decades later, she accused him of sexual assault. /24

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Here is another woman who engaged in a consensual relationship with Brand. He pursued her and she willingly entered into a relationship with him. /25 https://t.co/TAZaF5cRr4

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

In this case, once again, the woman engaged in consensual sexual activity with Brand. Her issue with him seemed to stem from his apparent disinterest, reflected in a glazed-over look during the act. It's unclear how she could hold him accountable for that. This is the same instance mentioned the earlier tweet, the woman doesn't mention being raped and instead discusses Brand having sex with her without protection. /26

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

The fourth woman with whom he once again engaged in consensual sexual relations. Do you notice a pattern here? All these women are now retroactively claiming, during the middle of their relationships, that they were raped. /27

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

She was having consensual sex with Brand, however it is claimed this ended and later he sexually assaulted her. She claims categorically that he did not rape her but he kissed her and wanted her to have sex with him. She claims a decade or more later that “[she] thinks” he put his hands down her trousers. She isn’t sure of what happened, no court of law would accept such a testimony but it is easy to convince people with salacious accusations. Ask yourself, why is it that Brand has a propensity to conduct sexual impropriety ONLY with women with whom he has consensual sexual relations? And after this ‘ordeal’ she continued to work for Brand. Is that believable that she would return to Brand's home REGULARLY out of her own free will if sexually assaulted by him? It is unlikely that out of the many relationships Brand had in L.A. only two women have witnessed Brand demonstrating aggressive or forceful sexual conduct? /28

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

She found herself in his bedroom under unclear circumstances, describing it as if it were a magic trick that brought her to the bedroom. She insists she didn't know how she ended up there and asks for trust in her account. Importantly, she explicitly states that he didn't rape her. /29

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Initially, she claimed she was alone with him and ended up in the bedroom, but later she asserts that a third person heard her screaming. The proof? We're asked to trust her word, as the third person didn't respond when contacted by The Times. /30 https://t.co/t19XIeVgBs

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

The discussion then shifts to an ex-girlfriend and her allegations in a book. It's worth noting that the ex-girlfriend uses pseudonyms, avoiding real names. This seems to suggest that if Brand were to sue for defamation, he'd have to prove that the book referred to him. Essentially, she didn't provide concrete names in her story, which raises questions. She clearly didn’t believe in the veracity of her own story. /31

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

One of the women allegedly attempted to extort money from him before approaching the press. Regarding her demands, she mentioned the lawyer's response, stating, “I was after money and implied that it was almost blackmail that I was doing, I’ve never mentioned money. [The lawyer was] the only person that’s ever mentioned money.” This is ridiculous, suggesting the lawyer was not acting on her behalf in seeking money from Brand. /32

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

It's evident that the media treated individuals like Epstein, Gates, Prince Andrew, and Soros with more leniency. Recently, the media seemed cautious not to damage the reputation of Philip Schofield and Hue Edwards, despite allegations of grooming minors. In contrast, they attempted to associate Brand with Jimmy Saville, employing guilt by association. This showcases how mainstream media aggressively targeted Brand and Tate, while exercising restraint in covering allegations against their own establishment figures. /33

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

At the same time as celebrating orgies, lesbianism, open relationships & threesomes as being empowering and liberating for women, they now criticise Brand for empowering women and himself to engage in these same sexual practices. Teenage sexuality itself is celebrated voyeuristically in shows like 'The White Lotus', 'Sex Education', 'Euphoria' and Channel 4's own 'Skins' which gleefully depicted teenage sexuality. Yet the same people now suddenly find themselves in the position of puritans disapproving of even sexual activity at legal age. 'Heartstopper' celebrates teenage homosexual activity & is a massive hit. & where were 'The Times' and Channel 4 when age gap gay sex was glamorised - between teachers and pupils no less - in the Oscar winning movie 'Call Me By Your Name?' and many others? /34

@OliLondonTV - Oli London

If you are wondering why the Mainstream Media has suddenly done a coordinated ‘Trial by Media’ campaign against Russel Brand…then this video will tell you exactly why.

@KatTheHammer1 - Kat™ The Hammer ⚒️

Here is the real reason Russell Brand is being canceled!!! He lit up big pharma on Bill Maher’s show!!! Listen to this! EPIC!

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

This is why Russel Brand has become a target in the corporate media right now. He started sharing too much info. He poked the bear and this is what happens. They all received their orders and came after him. He didn’t follow the approved narrative. That is why this is happening. Never forget that

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

How did we get to a point where we have an unelected ‘Global Health Czar’…that’s not a Doctor…who was the Best Friend of Jeffrey Epstein…the World’s most notorious Child-sex Trafficker? How is this real?

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

"How can you have energy companies that profit when there's an energy shortage?" … Russell Brand "Military industrial complex that profits when there's a war" "Pharmaceutical companies that profit when there's a pandemic" You're creating the necessity for an ongoing crisis.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

The real reason Russell Brand was attacked. The #WEF2030Agenda #GlobalistParasites like #BillGates took the decision to destroy #RussellBrand Why? Because he got too close to the truth. When you fly over the target expect the flak to be at its most intense. #UK #GlobalResistance

@realjoeoltmann - realjoeoltmann

Let me just say this... I don’t attack people on “our side”. Our side is focused on two things: getting rid of machines and getting rid of mail in ballots. I believe we will get rid of both before 2024 election. Why? Because the people are sick of the fraud and corruption and they know the “leaders” were selected not elected.. they know they are out for personal gain and power. The bow is breaking because the people are speaking and they know.. They know the elections are not transparent nor are they secure. They know they are fixed and they are fraudulent. They know the evidence is overwhelming while the selected leaders on both sides, media, tech companies, and corptocracy lie cheat and gaslight with impunity. Yet they want decorum when there should be none. They want me and you to break bread with liars who bring nothing to the table, defraud the people and talk about shiny objects that do not exist. They want to “let the authorities handle it” when the rot of corruption, collusion and evil grips them. If it doesn’t, then why… Why is there no accountability and why are there no consequences? Why are judges doing drive by shootings and still retaining their job (Oklahoma) and fbi and cia agents raping kids and women with impunity? Why are Hollywood moguls raping women for 30 years before being held accountable? Why has the Epstein list not been released? How did Feinstein die worth 130 million dollars on a 145k a year average salary? How do we pay 54 cents on every dollar to the government while they get on TV and demand more? How do we pay to drive on roads we already paid taxes to build? How is it that the border is open, entitlements are given out to illegals while hungry children in inner cities dodge bullets while they walk to a school that teaches them nothing except, how to cut off body parts and change genders? How is it there are states that made it legal to murder babies in the womb up to 9 months (colorado, look it up.)? How is it that protestors can take over senate and house offices and not be charged but J6 not even present at the capital are given 22 years for… thought crimes? How is it that a man can be eaten alive by bed bugs at a jail funded by the people? How is it that a county clerk, @realtinapeters could do an investigation, uncover massive fraud in the dominion election system get charged for the covert operation but NOT for accessing the machines, while writing 3 reports that outline the fraud and the media go silent? How is it that mountains of scientific data for a vaccine that killed millions be swept under the rug? How is it that the media lose interest in Maui much like they did in Vegas? How is it that the same man in charge of Vegas during the mass shooting, turns out was running things in Lahaina, during the fires? How is it that they feed off of us, raise taxes, steal our voices and yet… we are told to maintain decorum? So no. I will not give a free pass to fed bois, government operators, cheaters, demons and liars. Neither should you. Pray. Stand. Speak. Act.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Who did Jeffrey Epstein work for? Who won't ask this question? Ben Shapiro - SILENT Charlie Kirk - SILENT Laura Loomer - SILENT Benny Johnson - SILENT Tom Fitton - SILENT Jordan Peterson - SILENT Matt Walsh - SILENT Ezra Levant - SILENT Alx - SILENT Libs of TikTok - SILENT Jack Posobiec - SILENT Steven Crowder - SILENT Dan Bongino - SILENT Tom Fitton - SILENT To sin by silence, when we should protest, makes cowards out of men.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Jeffrey Epstein worked for the Israeli Mossad and videotaped powerful people raping children to create blackmail material for the Rotschild State of Israel. Some of his clients include: Bill Gates Alan Dershowitz Barack Obama Hilary Clinton Nancy Pelosi Jamie Dimon Bill Clinton Ehud Barak Banks like JP Morgan covered up transactions that show these clients purchasing children for rape and sacrifice. Controlled organizations like Turning Point USA, The Daily Wire, PragerU, Breitbart and The Gateway Pundit never make a connection between Jeffrey Epstein and the Rotschild State of Israel Both parties are enslaved to Israel and until that changes the United States of America will never be free.

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull𝕏

Joe Rogan calls out the Epstein Island Bill Gates cover-up. Do you agree that we are living in a Banana Republic? https://t.co/71Bx6Dj3Ge

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

Russell Brand: “The data is available now. Excess deaths are rising. The life expectancy in the United States of America is falling and it isn’t because of COVID…Curiously there is a total lack of appetite to investigate this…” https://t.co/OMAvm9H21J

@unhealthytruth - Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌

Russell Brand: “The data is available now. Excess deaths are rising. The life expectancy in the United States of America is falling and it isn’t because of COVID…Curiously there is a total lack of appetite to investigate this…” https://t.co/G7Yq4iW5GJ

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

1) Say hello to Nathan Wolfe. American virologist and founder of METABIOTA! The Biden-funded biolab company via Rosemont Seneca, studying bat coronaviruses in Ukraine circa 2014, via project PREDICT with CIA proxy, USAID. He is the epicenter of the Deep State bio network. Not only is he the founder of Biden’s Metabiota, he is a WEF member, DoD employee, sat on the board of Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance involved in Wuhan, funded by DARPA, Gates Foundation, funded Ghislaine Maxwell’s TerraMar project with the Clintons, member of The Edge Foundation collecting microbes and housing animal viruses all over the world, AND Russia have accused him directly of being the key player in creating SARS-CoV-2 from a bat coronavirus he discovered in Ukraine. Before I get started, I’d like to clarify that other people have dug into this subject already for years, I am not breaking any news here. However some new developments have fallen into place, specifically as it pertains to Russia and the Epstein blackmail operation, and I personally have connected some dots that I was unaware of until now, and the world needs to see it. I might be late to the party, but this is INSANE! Thread!🧵 @virushunter

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

2) So Nathan Wolfe is a virologist that calls himself the “Virus Hunter”. @virushunter He wrote a book in 2012, “The Viral Storm: The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age”. He warned that Humans are becoming more susceptible to pandemics and that we will see many pandemics in the future. He claims the only way to stop these future pandemics, it is to hunt down new animal pathogens before they can jump to humans, genetically enhance these animal pathogens to “gain the function” of infecting humans (aka bioweapon production), so we can study these human-engineered pathogens, and make vaccines for them preemptively JUST IN CASE these animal pathogens mutate this way naturally, so we have the medical deterrent on hand. This dude literally wrote the book on how they created SARS-CoV-2 and the “vaccines”. He wrote a book preemptively justifying his future bioweapon production. But that’s not all. He thanked 16 people for their assistance with all the information in his book, and one of the people he thanked was none other than Jeffrey Epstein himself. What does Epstein know about virology? Shout out to @hash_tigre for this thread in 2021.

@hash_tigre - hashtigre.bsky.social

Uh, this is interesting. So in 2011 a virologist named Nathan Wolfe writes a book called "The Viral Storm: The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age" Of the ~16 friends Wolfe thanks for adding time/unique skills to this book we find: - Jeffrey Epstein - Boris Nikolic - Linda Stone

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

3) The entire Nathan Wolfe timeline is laid out to perfection here by Rhonda Wilson via The Exposé. It’s an absolute MUST READ. The Bio Biden timeline, TerraMar with Ghislaine, his help with making the movie “Contagion”. Read it. It will blow your mind. https://expose-news.com/2022/04/13/who-is-the-virus-hunter-dr-nathan-wolfe/

Who is the Virus Hunter Dr. Nathan Wolfe? Dr. Nathan Wolfe was a founding citizen of Ghislaine Maxwell's TerraMar Project; a member of the Edge Foundation; a self-proclaimed “virus hunter” whose area of research is zoonotic diseases with a special focus on bats; with links to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and EcoHealth Alliance; who previously bungled epidemic responses while selling pandemic insurance;… expose-news.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

4) Nathan Wolfe is at the epicenter of the global zoonosis network and the production of SARS-CoV-2. But then you add his affiliation with the Clintons, Bill Gates, Maxwell, and Epstein, and it’s a whole new ballgame. Was @virushunter compromised by Epstein? We now have confirmation, via witness testimony, that Epstein was seeking out the most powerful people on Earth, to compromise and blackmail them, to essentially rule the world via proxy. What I’m getting at is, Epstein/Maxwell and their handlers, were involved in the plot to create and released SARS-CoV-2, via their connection to Nathan Wolfe. The Epstein blackmail operation didn’t just control Bill Clinton, Israeli Prime Ministers, and British Royalty; they also controlled the virologist who discovered and enhanced the virus that would eventually turn into the Covid-19 pandemic… And Russia claim one of the main reasons they invaded Ukraine, was to stop this bioweapon production, at Nathan Wolfe’s Biolabs in Ukraine, via his company Metabiota, that was funded by the Bidens. At the biolabs the media told you didn’t exist. I don’t know exactly who is higher in the power structure, but all the top players in Epstein’s blackmail operation, are also heavily involved in the global zoonotic virology network, the Biolabs in Ukraine, and American vaccine production.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

5) Then we look at the Epstein/Covid timeline. -July 2019: Epstein arrested -August 2019: Epstein “suicide” -November 2019: C19 outbreak begins in Wuhan Ladies and Gentleman… Jeffery Epstein and his Deep State handlers appear to be largely involved in the C19 pandemic… https://t.co/dRzQPbW462

@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson

Gonzalo Lira has died in a Ukraine prison. Victoria Nuland and Anthony Blinken's vindictive State Department allowed an America citizen to languish and die for the "crime" of challenging their war propaganda and the corruption of the thugs controlling Ukraine. The US media outside of @TuckerCarlson a man they fired completely ignored Lira's plight. Our country is run by a cabal of Zionist criminal perverts. They want you dead and would let you die if they had that power. Epstein was just the first time the lemming looked in the mirror and saw the open wounds. Gaza massacre is another mirror showing the rot in our society. Donbas was a silent war for 13 years. Arrogance and ignorance go hand in hand. Our institutions are criminal. They run on Backmail and Sickness. Epstein provided sexual services to a perverted Zionist cabal in America who already composed the donor class and banking cartel. These people as a culture are just child abusers, warmongers, and supremacists. Destroying the innocent is their nature. I wanna set the stage with this. And I want everyone to really think about this. Jeffrey Epstein wasn't the first or the last. But here we had a couple backed by the Israeli state who were known by multiple billionaires, heads of state, bankers, hedge fund managers, senators, governors and Hollywood producers. All of these people knew what they were up to, modeling agents even helped procure girls for the operation. They created an international pedophile rape ring with a massage parlor theme. Rather than stopping this, these men and women decided to participate in it instead. They got immunity after abetting him. His lawyers and financiers are wrapped up with the ADL the World Jewish Congress, UJA and Israeli affiliate groups. Maxwell's dad was an Israeli intelligence asset. His co-rapist are the whose who of Zionist including 3 Israeli prime ministers and 1 president. And we are supposed to sit there and act like we don't notice. Wexner, Bronfman, Rothschild, Maxwell, this isn't a Presbyterian problem. It is not the Chicoms. Of course the same people who are serial child rapists can also support the genocidal maniacs dropping bombs on apartments full of civilians. Smushing babies under concrete is self-defense in the mind of the deranged. Of course, Smashing babies under concrete is not self defense. It's psychotic. Pointing out how genocide is wrong, is not antisemitic. It's normal. Dershowitz lies about Hamas rapes that didn't happen and denies the Epstein rapes that did happen. Their accusations are confessions. More people heard the false rape allocations towards Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, and Julian Assange, than know about Jean Luc Brunel, Glenn Dubin or Peter Nygard. At some point the mass media got wind of Epstein and his ring. From magazines the TV news, their editors told them no you can't run the story. Why? Even after the arrests of Epstein, Maxwell and Brunel, there has been minimal coverage. They covered Bill and Monica more than Clinton traveling to pedophile Island. So that's not to protect Clinton. It's to protect the rape cell. What does this say about the rot in society. All your institutions failed. Police were bribed, a judge awarded a sweetheart deal, lawyers were co-conspirators in the crime. Multiple heads of state, royal family, multiple billionaires, the press, the FBI, and even the prison system itself, all failed. Epstein was murdered to prevent a plea-bargain or him opening his mouth. Evidence the FBI gathered went missing. Social media too simply banned people from talking about it, that is unless they were part of promoting ridiculous narratives. Why would YouTube ban video that talked about Epstein as they did to @shaunattwood for talking to me? Twitter was covering it up faster than it did Hunter's laptop content. But Why? Who has such power of media, social media, banks and politicians? Have we seen anyone demonstrate such power to cancel people and news stories?? Lira was a truth teller. He died in a Hell-hole that the compromised West created and could end at any time. Releasing the Epstein tapes would unravel EVERYTHING.

@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press

Tucker Carlson Ep. 70 just dropped: "An interview with Russell Brand. This is his first interview since governments colluded to shut down and destroy Brand." https://t.co/aAxSa3BXTl

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

🧵THREAD🧵 Do you remember how bad the media’s “Covid lab leak” - the hypothesis that the virus came from a lab - coverage was? I thought I did. But it was a more dramatic example of uniform media malpractice than even I remembered. So I revisited it. Buckle in, it’s long. ⤵️

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

It started in Feb 2020 when @SenTomCotton suggested looking into the CCP lab studying bats near the initial cases in Wuhan. The media were outraged. In a since-updated piece, @washingtonpost said the idea was a “conspiracy theory that has been repeatedly debunked by experts.” https://t.co/kAQFbA4baF

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

It wasn’t just WaPo. Shortly thereafter, @nytimes trotted out a similar allegation, calling the lab leak hypothesis a “fringe theory” and a “tale” designed to inflame social media. @CNN’s @ChrisCillizza said Cotton was “playing a dangerous game” with his suggestions. https://t.co/Xr7eXaNaKE

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

@USATODAY, in a since-updated fact check, said that Cotton’s claims were “false” because “overwhelming scientific evidence” said so. https://t.co/ZMTekytd3L

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

A quick pause here to point something out. What the media were up in arms about wasn’t the veracity of the lab leak idea. Just that people thought it was *plausible*. That it “may” be true, as @SenTomCotton said. Look how close the lab is to the first cases. “May” is too much? https://t.co/9v5eRdLKJP

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Anyway, back to the coverage. This was the dawn of what I like to call “experts say” reporting, where an outlet finds someone with credentials who agrees with them to make the point the outlet wants to make. Here’s @NatGeo, @Forbes, @CBSNews & @washingtonpost doing that here. https://t.co/3Of32wYYzl

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

There were some even more dramatic examples I want to call out. Maybe my all time favorite is from @NPR who, with the confidence that only that station posses, claimed that the lab leak theory had been “debunked” in April 2020. https://t.co/Ne6JWdYX4L

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

This @ABC headline presented without comment https://t.co/4wp49FkL0F

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

It was really a banner time period for outlets using “fact checkers” as a political weapon with no connection to facts, as @CNN does here. The word of the year had to be “debunked,” which many outlets seemed to believe meant “we don’t like this idea.” https://t.co/aj0x6LZND5

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

It’s impossible to ignore how this story intersects with Trump & his admin. Once he said he believed the lab leak idea, the press decided it must be a lie. Some really rich headlines here from @business (really?), @VICE (remember them?), @CNN (“crushed”!) and @BusinessInsider. https://t.co/bkeOZBe4WN

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

It’s really the condescending tone here from @chrislhayes that gets me. https://t.co/WmVM5FUKTr

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Apropos of absolutely nothing, I want to remind you that @NPR is funded in part by your tax dollars. More on your tax dollars soon. https://t.co/QTqJzNOM1K

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Just a quick aside. The press at the time purported to be very upset that Trump was using the same language that they had used a few weeks before, to describe the virus as Chinese. Here’s @CNN. https://t.co/QIF55kIfYK

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Then a poll came out finding that lots of people believed the lab leak theory: about a third of Americans. The press leapt to tar the believers as rubes & the people who convinced them as charlatans. There’s a lot of this but a few from @CNN, @Forbes, @voxdotcom & @thehill. https://t.co/fZkWphnC6g

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

One moment you may’ve forgotten: in April 2020, Trump stopped US funding to the lab in question in Wuhan. Read: up until then, your tax dollars were paying for dubious research in an autocratic regime that maybe started a plague. Naturally the media applauded that move, right?

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Wrong. The press were incensed Trump would stop giving your tax dollars to a shady lab in China. @CBSNews said it was “jeopardizing” a Covid cure. @nytimes did much the same. @ABC blamed the bad move on “conspiracy theories” as @VanityFair pointed to “right-wing disinformation.” https://t.co/nMSKxc2teb

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

One phenomenon that really stuck with me is how the press elevated China’s claims in an effort to, I presume, stick it to Trump. Look at how @nytimes, @CNN and @TIME put the U.S. and China on equal believability footings. https://t.co/cPc63kEHQX

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

This wasn’t a mere momentary blip. All the way until December, @AP was writing up the lab leak as a conspiracy theory that survived online “despite facts.” Right. https://t.co/sD2wZohlnx

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

The enormous irony of the @AP story about Covid “conspiracy theories” is the image that accompanies it. “Wear a mask outside” the 1984-esq wall art reads. https://t.co/p8ugGHMZi7

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

The real facts aren’t as hospitable to what the media was claiming in 2020. Further investigation into the lab leak in 2021 gave the idea a respectability even the mainstream media couldn’t ignore. They started to change their tune. Here’s @nytimes https://t.co/Hjh4DTOTqs

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Then in 2023 Biden’s own Department of Energy said that the lab leak theory was the most likely explanation for Covid’s origins. The side-by-sides of the original reporting vs the newly indisputable facts are what I see when I close my eyes at this point. @NPR https://t.co/nfPLdQDpzA

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

You probably don’t need me to spell it out for you, but you really can’t overstate the impact of the failure. When we should’ve been investigating what happened, the press had given social media platforms cover to censor the mere mention of the lab leak. The media cheered along. https://t.co/5OM3y7iocN

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

As a result of the media refusing to consider a politically inconvenient idea — and their need to throttle its very mention — we may never definitively know what caused a pandemic that’s killed millions and irrevocably changed the course of modern life.

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

And it may mean that some people get off scot-free for what they’ve done to play a role in that disaster. Hard to imagine that wasn’t the goal all along, in my humble opinion. https://t.co/SK7ZMOA6Vw

@OMApproach - Open Minded Approach

Dan Bongino on Epstein — before and after he became Deputy FBI Director! These people are like actors or puppets, used by those operating from the shadows. They’re all on the same side. They build narratives and then dismantle them when the timing suits their agenda. It's all about keeping your attention so they can manipulate you — and make no mistake, they’re all playing for the same team. The most important thing is that you believe there are left and right sides, when in reality, the elite only cares about their own survival.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

“I believe they’ve been able to effectively get away with not investigating…Epstein’s intelligence connections because of the Pandora’s box that that opens…” @MikeBenzCyber says he knows what documents need to be published in order to show that this is a genuine investigation. https://t.co/p9VxtRcVHU

@OunkaOnX - Ounka

Blaming Russia for Epstein is the media's final act of cowardice. They can't touch the Mossad connection because it leads back to the same outlets, politicians, and lobbies that sign their checks https://t.co/d1jGMhzEjR

@RedactedNews - Redacted

Billionaire media moguls control what you see. Deregulation runs rampant. Will the truth EVER be revealed? Demand transparency! #EpsteinFiles https://t.co/NQV3mmJQz8

@polishprincessh - 👑💥 Serenity 💥👑

People keep asking me why I keep talking about Epstein. Why I won’t “move on.” Why I won’t drop it. Here’s why: this video shows DIARY Of 16-Year-Old Epstein Victim And It Will SHOCK You We are talking about children who were trafficked, abused, raped, killed and sold in a system that operated in the open around some of the most powerful people on the planet. And this wasn’t one monster operating alone in the dark. A billionaire trafficker doesn’t build a global machine like that by himself. People flew on the planes. People attended the parties. People funded it. People protected it. For years. The most powerful institutions in the world watched this happen in plain sight and somehow the system still expects the public to accept silence, sealed records, missing information, and the same tired message to “trust the process.” No. If someone was involved, expose them. I don’t care what political party they belong to, what office they hold, or how famous they are. Every single person connected to it should be investigated. Because a system that protects the powerful while children are trafficked is not broken by accident. It’s broken by design. So when people ask why I keep talking about Epstein, they’re asking the wrong question. The real question is why so many people seem so desperate for everyone else to shut up about it.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Neil Oliver unleashes a devastating 9-minute monologue on the Epstein memo from the FBI and DOJ: “No client list, no blackmail, no murder — just suicide by hanging while sitting on the floor.” He calls it naked power in action — a deliberate test of submission where we’re expected to accept nonsense as truth. Key lines that cut deep: - “The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” (Orwell, 1984) - “Ghislaine Maxwell is in jail for trafficking underage girls… to no one at all?” - “We’re being herded across a Rubicon — from truth in violet to truth being whatever the powerful say it is.” - “The hoped-for promise of a new regime in the White House is desiccating and crumbling like a sandcastle in the summer wind.” He sees the memo not as closure, but as a gauntlet thrown down: accept what we say — even when we know you know it makes no sense. This is post-truth power on full display. Do you feel the same sense of betrayal watching the Epstein story fold this way? Or is Oliver overreaching?

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Credit: @thecoastguy; https://www.youtube.com/@Neil-Oliver

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

Channel 4 and 'Times' Russell Brand Hit-Piece Exposed: Right & Left Wing British Media Unite to Smear Alternative Voices Russel Brand is a well known ALTERNATIVE media personality. He doesn’t follow or propagate the mainstream narrative. An Axis of MSM has colluded to DESTROY @rustyrockets reputation because he poses an existential threat to them. When he led a hedonistic lifestyle, mainstream media promoted and broadcast his stereotypically liberal behaviour. At that time they had no issue. But decades later, after he left that lifestyle, and agitated MSM - both the Right and Left wing branches, they have manufactured weak allegations out of his past to take him out. They did the same with @Cobratate and they will do the same again. The irony is that liberal leftist society promotes hedonism and then when the time is right use that very behaviour to cancel the person. Welcome to 2023 The media has assumed upon itself the role of prosecutor, judge and jury with no regard for justice and due process. Let’s do a FORENSIC analysis into The Times and Channel 4 Hit Piece to see the strength of these claims. Let’s look at the ‘evidence’. /1