reSee.it - Related Post Feed

VigilantFox
Posted - June 20, 2023 at 10:53 PM
Saved - June 25, 2023 at 1:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Robert Kennedy Jr. claims that Ivermectin, known for its impact on human health, was destroyed due to its threat to a $200 billion vaccine industry. @I_Am_JohnCullen disagrees, suggesting that Hillary Clinton had ulterior motives for not supporting Ivermectin or HCQ.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

.@RobertKennedyJr Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He believes this is evidence of a conspiracy, as the medication in question, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy. The speaker suggests that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were discredited to protect the vaccine industry, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if there are existing effective medications. Acknowledging the effectiveness of these medications would have undermined the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw the CNN thing where they made my face yellow and said I was taking horse medication, which is that the most the to say that and repeat that over and over again is such a clear indication that they conspired. It's such a because it's this it's uniform. Farm. It's horse dewormer, uniform, a medication that's used far more often in human beings. It's been prescribed to Speaker 1: for Bill billions. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's insane. And the fact that Speaker 1: And won the Nobel Prize for for efficacy in humans. Speaker 0: Yeah. In humans. Yeah. It was wild. It was just wild. Speaker 1: They had to do it. They had to discredit Ivermectin because, you know, because there's a federal law the federal law the emergency use authorization statute says that you cannot issue You you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that had that is demonstrated effective against the target illness. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200,000,000,000 vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

Actually, Bobby is wrong. If Ivermectin or HCQ was found to be effective, Hillary wouldn't have gotten what she wanted. No mail in voting. Bobby is confusing one of the ulterior motives for the primary motive, which Hillary laid out beautifully. Not 200 dead, March 18, 2020:

VigilantFox
Posted - July 22, 2023 at 1:02 AM
Saved - July 23, 2023 at 4:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Robert Kennedy Jr. reveals the miraculous benefits of Ivermectin, citing 100 studies showing a significant reduction in hospitalizations and deaths. He also exposes Fauci's opposition to early treatment due to a federal law. Ivermectin, one of the safest medicines in history, has minimal side effects and no documented deaths. Its potential impact on human health rivals penicillin. Let's explore this alternative treatment further. Watch the full interview here: [link].

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

.@RobertKennedyJr Unloads the Truth About Ivermectin to The Hill: “It Was Really a Miracle Drug” “There are now 100 studies that show that Ivermectin had profound benefits. Generally speaking, a 70% to 85% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths,” reported Kennedy. “It was…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 100 studies have shown that Ivermectin has had significant benefits, reducing hospitalizations and deaths by 70 to 85%. It has been widely used around the world, including in Nigeria, where it helped lower the COVID death rate. Kerala and Uttar Pradesh states in India also used Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, effectively ending the pandemic. Numerous studies, including 400 on hydroxychloroquine and nearly 100 on Ivermectin, demonstrate their benefits. However, a few government-funded studies, including those by the WHO and financed by Bill Gates, claim no benefits but have been criticized for their methodology. For more information, you can visit the websites of Dr. Meryl Masse or Yale epidemiologist Harvey Riesch.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are now a 100 studies that show that Ivermectin had profound benefits in generally speaking, a 70 to 85% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths. It it was really a miracle drug, particularly in the later pandemic. I'm trying to think if that was all in, like, Bangladesh or South America, it could be because of the world, not parasites. It was all over the world, and and the the countries where they use it for parasites, Nigeria, which has the highest river blindness burden in the world, did have the lowest COVID death rate in the world. The they use both. They also have the biggest malaria burden, so virtually the entire population is on my on hydroxychloroquine, and a large part of the population is on Ivermectin for the river blindness, so, and they had almost no vaccination. They had, I think, 1, like something like one point 30% vaccination, so they did very well, but there are states in India, sort of side by side states like Kerala and Uttar Pradesh used our protocol and had the same, comparable death rates and Uttar Pradesh use ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and ended the pandemic overnight, but there's there's also if you go in the literature and there's a there's a doctor called Meryl Masse who has assembled a lot of these, so you can go on her website and see them, or Harvey Riesch, who's the Yale epidemiologist, has also assembled them. There's 400 studies that show benefits from Hydroxychloroquine. Over almost a 100 studies, I think 99, that show extreme benefits like devastating benefits of Ivermectin, and, and there's a handful of studies that are government produced, WHO produced, finance by Bill Gates that say that there was no benefit, but those studies have a lot of problems.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RobertKennedyJr Has Also Explained in the Past Why Fauci Had Such a Problem With Early Treatment What he said blew @megynkelly's mind: "Tony Fauci's problem is this: there's a little-known Federal law that says, you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tony Fauci's problem is that a federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an approved medication that effectively treats the target disease. If Fauci or anyone had acknowledged that Ivermectin works as a treatment for COVID, the vaccine would not have received authorization. Despite many doctors and publications supporting Ivermectin, Fauci actively dismissed it as a dangerous medication to drown out its effectiveness. It is unclear why he continued to do so after receiving authorization, but there is a strong incentive for him to discredit Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Notable doctors like Harvey Reich and Pierre Cory have successfully treated thousands of COVID patients.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tony Fauci's problem is this. There's a little known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is a medic any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease. So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted best way to get the vaccine. And then, the the case. And they could never have gotten them approved, and it would have been, you know, a 200,000,000,000 enterprise that would have collapsed. Speaker 1: That is fascinating. I mean, I I have been covering this very closely now for all of the 2 years. That's the first I've heard that that, I mean, I in your book. So he would not have gotten emergency use authorization for the vaccine if it if the medical community had been saying Ivermectin works. It is an effective treatment for COVID. Speaker 0: Well, the medical community, a lot of it was saying that. Head. I mean, there's 17,000 doctors who've signed a petition, and there are, you know, there are so many peer reviewed publications now that consistently say that, but he had to aggressively crusade against it to kind of drown out those reports by saying it's a hoarder's medication. It's you know, people are taking it, and it's dangerous, and overdose in people and, you Speaker 1: know, I don't know. Why did he keep saying it? Why did he why did he keep saying it after he got his authorization? Speaker 0: Well, 1, even if you have the emergency use authorization, it's it the law appears to say you can't have it anymore if there's a functioning medication. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: Oh, you know, that may be why. Again, I try not to look in his head, but I do. There's a very, very strong incentive for him to kill ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. And, you know, there are many doctors, including Harvey Reich at Yale, is one of the leading, biostatisticians, epidemiologists in in the world. Pierre, Cory, these doctors who've who've treated tens of thousands of, of COVID patients successfully,

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RobertKennedyJr @megynkelly And @PierreKory Has Argued Ivermectin Is "One of the Safest Medicines in the History of Medicine" • Really hard to overdose on • "There has not been one documented provable death associated with ivermectin." • Even the WHO acknowledges that most side effects are "minor and…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin is considered one of the safest medicines in history. It has a wide dosing range, making it difficult to overdose on. A comprehensive review by a French toxicologist found no documented deaths associated with Ivermectin, even with reports of massive overdoses. The World Health Organization (WHO) also acknowledges its safety, stating that most side effects are minor and temporary. In my experience, I have used Ivermectin for various diseases related to COVID, and the only potential side effects I have observed are occasional nausea, diarrhea, and blurry vision, which disappear once the medication is stopped. Overall, I cannot emphasize enough how safe and reliable Ivermectin is to use.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivermectin. Is it dangerous? No. It is demonstrably provably one of the safest medicines in the history of medicine. Greg, first of all, it is really hard to overdose on I've met. It has a really wide range of dosing. Uh-uh. In fact, you could probably take 100 times the standard dose. You might get sick at that dose, but I mean, it has such a wide dosing range. That's number 1. Number 2, in a comprehensive review done by a famous French toxicologist probably 2 years ago now, the he reviewed all the data around rivamethane. In that, review, he says there's not been one documented provable death associated with Ivermectin even given the rate reports of massive overdoses. So, I mean, the safety is unparalleled unparalleled. I mean, even the WHO in their document on Ivermectin when they talk about as a on their list of essential medicines of the world, they write that most side effects are minor and transient. And I'll tell you, I've been use I use it all the time in a number of different phases disease around, COVID. And literally, if it does anything bad to someone, it might give a little nausea, occasionally some diarrhea, occasionally a little bit of a blurry vision, but it goes away as soon as you stop. The so, it I I can't even talk much more about how safety how safe it is. It's it's really condition. It is such a great medicine to work with because of its safety. You don't have to worry about

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized, 2nd to penicillin, for having the greatest impact on human health. If there were minimal risk of side effects, the worst that could have happened, in all likelihood, was that it wouldn't work. So, why not at least try and see what would happen?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin, discovered by scientists Satoshi Omura and William C. Campbell, is a drug that kills parasites by disabling their neurons. It was originally used to treat river blindness in Africa, a disease that caused many people to lose their eyesight. Thanks to Ivermectin, this disease is now close to being eliminated. The drug has had a significant impact on human health and is considered second only to penicillin. Over the past 30 years, humans have taken approximately 3.7 billion doses of Ivermectin.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivermectin was discovered in Tokyo by 2 scientists, Satoshi Omura and William c Campbell. Doctor. Ohmura was a golfer, and on one of his golf trips he picked up a sample of soil, around here, like any scientist would, on the east coast of the Izu Peninsula. And in this sample of soil was this bacteria. When they took her to the lab, they found it was able to kill roundworms who's in mice. So they isolated the bacteria's active compounds, slightly changed this structure, and called this new compound Ivermectin. This new drug was a big deal, and both doctors Omura and doctor Campbell won a Nobel Prize for discovering What was so special about Ivermectin? Well, scientists are still puzzled by how exactly it works, but but it seems to penetrate the nervous system of parasites. It disables their neurons, and that would basically make the parasite dysfunction until it dies. So in 1988, this drug was used widely in Africa to treat river blindness. This is a very unpleasant disease caused by a worm. Back in those days, the World Health Organization had reported that Because of river blindness, some 270,000 people had lost their eyesight. But thanks to Ivermectin, this disease is now on the brink of elimination. In fact, Ivermectin was so great at killing off parasites, it was recognized as being second to penicillin in terms of having the greatest impact on human health. And over the past 30 years, some 3,700,000,000 doses of Ivermectin were taken by humans.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I've covered the COVID crisis extensively over the past couple of years and have shared over 7,000 unique videos within that time. If you found this thread insightful, don't forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 before you leave.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Full Interview: https://youtu.be/y2BCOMTTxK4

VigilantFox
Posted - August 17, 2023 at 6:23 PM
Saved - August 18, 2023 at 11:38 AM

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is “one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era. A medicine that, according to the numerous top scientists I’ve interviewed … could have ended the pandemic before it began.” Ivermectin: The Truth. Brilliant work from Mikki Willis (@OfficialPlandemic).

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the controversy surrounding the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. While some claim it is a safe and effective medicine, others argue that it is a horse dewormer with no clinical evidence of its efficacy. The video highlights the experiences of doctors who have faced backlash for advocating for Ivermectin and suggests that powerful forces, including pharmaceutical companies, may be suppressing its use. It also mentions studies and success stories from countries like Peru, India, and Japan where Ivermectin has been used effectively. The video raises concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on media and academic research. Overall, it presents Ivermectin as a potentially valuable treatment option that has been unfairly maligned.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of all the harmful misinformation spread over the past couple of years, one of the most disturbing false narratives was targeted at the Nobel Prize winning human medicine, Ivermectin. What you're about to see will reveal the motive behind the smear campaign against One of the safest and most effective medicines of this era. A medicine that, according to the numerous top scientists I've interviewed this year, could have ended the pandemic before it began. Speaker 1: So things are clearly bad, but they're being made even worse by people who have refused to take the vaccine and instead Are swallowing horse paste. Speaker 2: Horse dewormer. There's no clinical evidence that indicates that this works. Speaker 1: It goes beyond that. We actually know that It doesn't work. Ivermectin is ineffective against COVID, but could put you in a coma. It can kill you. It can kill you. Speaker 3: Turns out I got COVID. So we immediately threw the kitchen sink at all kinds of meds, monoclonal antibodies, Ivermectin. Speaker 0: One of those drugs he mentioned, Ivermectin, is something more often used to deworm horses. Speaker 4: We can talk about that. That bothered you. It should bother you too. Speaker 3: They're lying at your network about people taking human drugs versus drugs for the veterinarian. Speaker 5: They're calling it a horse Speaker 4: to wormer. It's not a Speaker 6: flattering thing. I get that. Speaker 4: It's a lie. They they shouldn't have said Speaker 7: Why did Speaker 2: they do that? I don't know. You're the most Speaker 3: I didn't die over there. Speaker 4: Ivermectin can be a very effective medication. Speaker 7: You are more likely to die from taking Tylenol than Ivermectin, yet the FDA calls this a dangerous Horse deworming medicine. Speaker 0: What initially led this was an FDA Twitter account that use the term y'all to express denigration of Ivermectin as a horse drug. I have horses. The truth is that the dose that's used for horses by body weight is the same dose that's recommended for humans, But it's formulated and manufactured to a quality standard that's very different. Speaker 6: Lots of medicines are used in both animals and humans. So it's not a sufficient argument for Somebody to say, it's a horse dewormer. Speaker 1: Yesterday, the CDC put out a national advisory on this warning the whole country against taking this Drug Ivermectin formulated for horses and cows in sheep. Speaker 4: With that, memo fired to every doctor, then Suddenly, me and all my early treatment colleagues around the country, we were faced with problems like we'd never had before. Speaker 6: I work as an emergency room doctor. And And not only an emergency room doctor, I teach advanced trauma life support. Of course, to other doctors that wanna work in the emergency room on how to stabilize patients. We We were being told there's nothing you can do. Just wait for Fauci and the FDA to acknowledge a vaccine that they were gonna create, and there's no treatment, they said. Why would you want to decrease access to quality life saving, measures for people who are fighting a worldwide pandemic? Speaker 2: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw a doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, Safe and effective drug for the application that doctor thought was appropriate. My group of 5, the core 5 of us ICU doctors, Collectively, Speaker 4: we're some of the most highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Speaker 2: Paul Maric is the most published practicing intensivist in the world. As we sit here today, I'm the most published person in my field In history. But when COVID nineteen hit, my clinical and academic world was turned upside down. Speaker 8: Twitter, in its wisdom, has decided to suspend the account of doctor Robert Malone. Now Robert Malone happens to be the inventor of the mRNA technology of making vaccines. His Twitter account has been suspended because he was allegedly spreading Misinformation on COVID nineteen vaccines. Let that sink in. Speaker 4: We have made contributions to our field for decades. So when we find ourselves, like, dismissed, you know, and they'll do that to anyone. You're suddenly fringe. Speaker 6: Touted as a miracle prevention and cure by far right commentators and anti vaxxers. Speaker 0: I'm not. Although I've been characterized as a Right wing proud boy. This is a bipartisan issue and the physicians represented here are truly a bipartisan group. Speaker 4: Our lives started going sideways professionally. Paul started getting numerous complaints against him that he's never had in his career. Speaker 7: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people Die. Speaker 9: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products and related Authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, Preventing or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the US. Speaker 0: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, Then the logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products is no longer supportable. Speaker 4: The war on Ivermectin is waged by very powerful forces with a lot of money. I mean, public health was built on an obsessive global vaccination policy which Ivermectin would have threatened. Speaker 1: We've got Pfizer's Q3 earnings. Revenue, they're projecting to be 98 To $102,000,000,000. Pfizer, Speaker 10: BioNTech, and Moderna. Do you know how much profit they made from these shots? $1,000 every second from Wuhan virus vaccine. Speaker 4: You talk about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in geopolitical implications That would be significantly affected if the people had access to a safe and widely available medicine. Speaker 11: This is an incredibly cheap drug. It's off license. It's generic. It can be manufactured in huge amounts in India. Remarkably low cost. Speaker 9: Merck's patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996. In 2021, Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective Against COVID nineteen and bizarrely claimed, quote, a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. It was plenty safe for Merck to distribute widely when it was still under patent, but Now they're claiming the safety record is insufficient. Speaker 0: Folks need to understand that just because there is an article out there that asserts that something is false recognize that those are paid. Speaker 6: Every major media outlet in the United States shares at least 1 board member with at least 1 drug company. Let me put the perspective for you. These board members wake up. They go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, and then they have their driver take them over to a meeting with NBC To decide what kind of programming that network is going to air. They can't be honest and objective about big pharma Because big pharma pays their bills. Speaker 11: In fact, one analysis claimed 9 out of the top 10 drug makers spent more on Marketing than they did on research. Speaker 5: CNN tonight brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Pfizer. Pfizer. Pfizer. Speaker 11: If asked the question, did you know how much influence your former employer had on big media and so on? I had no idea. It is clear that The pharmaceutical industry has has a great deal of sway on what goes on. If you can shape the message, then you can shape the world. And that's what they've done. Speaker 6: When was Speaker 2: the last time you turned on the news and ever got an update about how the rest of the world is handling COVID? Speaker 12: A group of South African doctors Has launched an urgent court application. They are seeking easier access to Ivermectin. Speaker 1: Globally, at least 5 countries want to use Ivermectin to treat COVID nineteen, Including India and Argentina. Speaker 2: There are numerous concrete tests in medical journals around the world that Ivermectin Does work. The earliest reports we had, one of them we had in Peru, where they got into a good mode of using multidrug Treatment with an Ivermectin based approach that they were crushing their curves. Speaker 13: And the president of Tokyo Medical Association announced to all doctors during a summer surge That they should use Ivermectin in their treatment. Within weeks, the hospitalization rates reported out of Japan Were lower than at any other time in the pandemic. Speaker 2: The real proof positive came when COVID nineteen really hit hard in Mexico City. They finally, after lots of struggle, came with an Ivermectin based multi drug approach and literally clear out the hospitals. And then we had reports all the way through that various states in India. Speaker 14: In India, the government has been widely promoting the use of Ivermectin. State leaders have just declared that Uttar Pradesh is now officially COVID free. A region with nearly as many people as the entire United States is totally COVID free. Speaker 4: The miracle success of Uttar Pradesh, not one mention of Ivermectin being used. Speaker 9: In the Speaker 1: countries that it has been used, in the countries where the studies are, the results are not good. They are overwhelming. They are well over 90% success rate. Speaker 13: In the United States, it's a horse dewormer. It's horse based and only the illiterate, ignorant, and and or unvaccinated use it. Speaker 0: The key paradox is if you look at the mortality rate in the United States, one of the most highly funded medical care systems in the world. And what we find is the mortality in the United States is among the worst in the world. Speaker 13: If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there's only one way to understand them. They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies. They can design trials to fail to disprove the use of cheap medicines And they can make things appear that they don't work. Speaker 0: I sit as a non voting member of the active committee for drugs with NIH. I've seen the dynamics of what are going on with all those trials which most of which have failed. Unfortunately it's imminently possible to manipulate the outcomes of a clinical study. If you want a study to fail, that's dead easy. Speaker 4: Now, their 4th Quote, unquote negative study of Ivermectin in a major medical journal. And each time is a media frenzy. Speaker 1: There was a systematic review looking at Randomized controlled trials that have been done, and they found that there was no benefit for Ivermectin in reducing mortality, death to COVID nineteen, No reduction in symptoms or duration of symptoms for COVID nineteen, so it does not work. Speaker 11: People need to understand that academics Have been threatened with losing their position and threatened with getting no further research grants If they speak out against the narrative, guess why that is? 2 thirds of the world's non commercial biological research is funded by just 3 bodies. The Wellcome Trust in the UK, the NIH, Specifically, the NIAID under Tony Fauci and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. There's this pattern Speaker 0: that is consistent with a concerted effort to mislead the public by withholding information using modern technology, media, censorship, Really, let's call it what it is. Thought control. Speaker 1: He couldn't actually control, exactly what people think. And that is the that is our job. Yeah. Speaker 2: Whenever you have clear cut evidence that a drug works, you have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people know so that they could have Access. What are you telling people is the is the optimal profile? I want a pill, orally administered, single pill Given for 7 to 10 days, little drug drug interaction and low toxicity. Give me that and I'll be really happy. Speaker 14: Ivermectin has been used safely for decades, has no known drug interactions, won a Nobel Prize for its success Treating humans and is on the WHO's list of the safest most effective medicines in the entire world. Speaker 0: And it showed an 86% effectiveness to prevent people from contracting COVID. Speaker 6: Ivermectin has been used over four A 1000000000 times and it's used for a wide variety of treatments. Ivermectin Speaker 14: has been shown to possess different Anti inflammation, antiviral, and anti tumor properties. Speaker 1: Clinical studies abroad suggested works. Speaker 8: All the studies show that it does have a positive effect. Speaker 1: That That is the thing about Ivermectin. It's not good. It's great. Speaker 4: I have never seen an evidence based this large with 81 controlled 10 years of in vitro studies in the lab against a dozen RNA viruses, all showing that Ivermectin stops replication. It literally is In my mind, the single greatest public health achievement in our history of infection control in the world.
VigilantFox
Posted - September 21, 2023 at 5:36 PM
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 12:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, a repurposed drug, has shown promising results in reducing COVID-19 mortality. Studies indicate a 92% decrease in deaths. Unlike hydroxychloroquine, trials with toxic doses were not possible due to ivermectin's effectiveness increasing with higher doses. It binds to the spike protein, preventing clotting and competing with it. Testimonials highlight positive outcomes. However, the pharmaceutical industry's disinformation campaign against generic drugs is concerning. Access to ivermectin remains a challenge. VigilantNews shares additional stories of interest. Fauci admits COVID vaccines cause myocarditis, RFK Jr reveals the real shooter behind his father's death, teachers face aggressive cancers post-vaccine mandates, a spike detox protocol is published, and a beef rancher opposes mRNA injections in cattle.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

🧵 Ivermectin: Miracle Reversals – "The More You Give, The Better It Is" To this day, the media continues to gaslight and spew disinformation about ivermectin. And they are doing so in the face of a peer-reviewed, showing a 92% reduction in mortality.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, there was a disinformation campaign against Hydroxychloroquine, a generic drug. The pharmaceutical industry opposes generic drugs as they reduce profits. They conducted trials with toxic doses of Hydroxychloroquine, causing increased deaths. On the other hand, Ivermectin is beneficial when given in higher doses. The spike protein in COVID-19 causes clotting issues and suppresses interferon, a chemical that helps fight infections and cancer. Medicines like Ivermectin and others can boost interferon levels and prevent clotting by binding to receptors. Some patients given high doses of Ivermectin have shown remarkable recovery, as it competes with the spike protein for binding sites and prevents clot formation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2020, there was a global disinformation campaign attacking Hydroxychloroquine. It's a generic repurposed drug. And the pharmaceutical industry has long had that as a business model. They cannot have generic drugs in the marketplace because it absolutely robs them of the profit potential for novel pharmaceutical products. And what they did to Hydroxychloroquine was far more sinister than Ivermectin because they were able to design trials using toxic doses, which actually caused increases in deaths. They couldn't do that with Ivermectin because the more you give, the better it is. So Wow. So that was the one non sinister thing they Speaker 1: So clotting is a huge problem with the spike protein. Interferon. So interferon is, A very important chemical that your cells make to recruit cells to react to either infections or cancer. Interferon is suppressed by the spike protein. So that's another harm of the spike protein. So there are medicines that can re rev up your interferon. Some of them are the drugs that shall not be named. Interestingly too, I mean Ivermectin. But Ivermectin also binds one of the, clotting receptors, the CD 147 receptors. So some of these Miracle rebound patients that many colleagues have seen around the world, that were in the ICU and given up for dead, Given high doses of Ivermectin, I have a colleague in South Africa who saw a patient literally reperfuse her body before her eyes once she got the dose high enough. Because it will Literally bumped the spike protein off the CD 140 receptor. And all of a sudden, Yeah, competitively Ivermectin and the spike bind for that, or vie compete for that site. But when there's enough Ivermectin circulation and it pushes that off, Now, this bike can't cause those clots to hold together.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - Here's a link to that study for reference. https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-for-covid-19-led-up-to-a-92-reduction-in-covid-19-mortality-rate-in-a-dose-response-manner-results-of-a-prospective-observational-study-of-a-strictly-controlled-population-of-88012-subjects#!/

Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects Background We have previously demonstrated that ivermectin used as prophylaxis for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), irrespective of the regularity, in a strictly controlled citywide program in Southern Brazil (Itajaí, Brazil), was associated with reductions in COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates. In this study, our objective was to determine if the regular use of ivermectin impacted the level of protection from COVID-19 and related outcomes, reinforcing the efficacy of ivermectin through the demonstration of a dose-response effect. Methods This exploratory analysis of a prospective observational study involved a program that used ivermectin at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day for two consecutive days, every 15 days, for 150 days. Regularity definitions were as follows: regular users had 180 mg or more of ivermectin and irregular users had up to 60 mg, in total, throughout the program. Comparisons were made between non-users (subjects who did not use ivermectin), and regular and irregular users after multivariate adjustments. The full city database was used to calculate and compare COVID-19 infection and the risk of dying from COVID-19. The COVID-19 database was used and propensity score matching (PSM) was employed for hospitalization and mortality rates. Results Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg). The remaining 71,548 participants were not included in the analysis. COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%) (risk rate (RR): 0.51; 95% CI: 0.45-0.58; p < 0.0001), and 25% lower than irregular users (4.54%) (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85; p < 0.0001). The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.64-0.73; p < 0.0001). Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users. After PSM, the matched analysis contained 283 subjects in each group of non-users and regular users, between regular users and irregular users, and 1,542 subjects between non-users and irregular users. The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users (p < 0.0001), and by 29% among irregular users compared to non-users (RR: 0.781; 95% CI: 0.49-1.05; p = 0.099). Mortality rate was 92% lower in regular users than non-users (RR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.35; p = 0.0008) and 84% lower than irregular users (RR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.71; p = 0.016), while irregular users had a 37% lower mortality rate reduction than non-users (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.99; p = 0.049). Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among regular users than non-users (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03-0.57; p = 0.006), and 72% lower than irregular users (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.07-1.18; p = 0.083), while irregular users had a 51% reduction compared to non-users (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.32-0.76; p = 0.001). Conclusion Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19. cureus.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - But before we got here, they made a BIG mistake in trying to overdose patients on ivermectin like they did with hydroxychloroquine. Because instead of harming patients with toxic doses, it turns out the more ivermectin you give, the better it works.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - Dr. @PierreKory provides more details: "In 2020, there was a global disinformation campaign attacking hydroxychloroquine. It’s a generic, repurposed drug. And the pharmaceutical industry has long had that as a business model. They cannot have generic drugs in the marketplace because it absolutely robs them of the profit potential for novel pharmaceutical products. "And what they did to hydroxychloroquine was far more sinister than ivermectin because they were able to design trials using toxic doses, which actually caused increases in deaths. They couldn’t do that with ivermectin because the more you give, the better it is."

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - But what is it about ivermectin that makes it work better at higher doses? Dr. Ryan Cole (@drcole12) answers this question nicely: "So clotting is a huge problem with this spike protein. Interferon. So interferon is a very important chemical that your cells make to recruit cells to react to either infections or cancer. Interferon is suppressed by the spike protein — so that's another harm of the spike protein. So there are medicines that can re-rev up your interferon — some of them are the drugs that shall not be named." Dr. Cole can’t help but laugh at the corrupt state of medicine. He continued. "Interestingly, too. I mean, ivermectin. But ivermectin also binds one of the clotting receptors, the CD147 receptor. So some of these miracle rebound patients that many colleagues have seen around the world that were in the ICU and given up for dead — given high doses of ivermectin. "I have a colleague in South Africa [who] saw a patient literally reperfuse her body before her eyes once she got the dose high enough because it will literally bump the spike protein off the CD147 receptor. And, all of a sudden, competitively, ivermectin and the spike compete for that site. But when there's enough ivermectin in circulation, it pushes that off. Now the spike can’t cause those clots to hold together."

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @drcole12 #6 - So not only does ivermectin bind tightly to spike protein, but it also competes with spike to prevent clotting. And when families can actually obtain access to this drug, the testimonials are usually very positive.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @drcole12 END - Thanks for reading this short and quick thread. Here are five more stories from @VigilantNews that you may find interesting: #5 - Fauci now admits the COVID vaccines cause myocarditis. https://vigilantnews.com/post/safe-and-effective-dr-fauci-now-admits-covid-vaccines-cause-myocarditis-video

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE: Dr. Fauci Now Admits COVID Vaccines Cause Myocarditis (VIDEO) This comes after months of dismissing or downplaying concerns about potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccines. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @drcole12 @VigilantNews #4 - RFK Jr. identifies "the real shooter" behind his father's death. https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-identifies-the-real-shooter-behind-his-fathers-death

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death “When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me, as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @drcole12 @VigilantNews #3 - Teachers are being decimated by aggressive metastatic cancers after vaccine mandates. https://vigilantnews.com/post/teachers-are-being-decimated-by-aggressive-and-metastatic-cancers-after-covid-19-vaccine-mandates

Teachers Are Being Decimated by Aggressive and Metastatic Cancers After COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Dr. William Makis presents 34 recent tragic cases in the United States. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @drcole12 @VigilantNews #2 - First-ever published spike detox protocol details how you can get better after the COVID shots. https://vigilantnews.com/post/first-ever-spike-detox-protocol-appears-in-medical-journal-heres-how-you-can-get-better

First-Ever Spike Detox Protocol Appears in US Medical Journal: Here’s How You Can Get Better "Patients indeed are getting better on this approach," says renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @drcole12 @VigilantNews #1 - Cattle are being injected with mRNA "vaccines," but one beef rancher is taking a stand. https://vigilantnews.com/post/beef-company-ceo-ill-shut-down-the-company-before-we-ship-a-single-bag-with-mrna-injected-meat

Beef Company CEO: “I’ll Shut Down the Company Before We Ship a Single Bag With mRNA-Injected Meat” mRNA-injected pork has been a thing since 2018. And beef is next on the agenda. vigilantnews.com
VigilantFox
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 5:45 PM
Saved - October 3, 2023 at 12:46 AM

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Miracle Drug? Everything They Don't Want You to Know About Ivermectin Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-Winning discovery that the media called "horse paste," not only effectively treats COVID-19 but also several other ailments — and possibly cancer.

VigilantFox
Posted - November 2, 2023 at 4:53 PM
Saved - November 2, 2023 at 5:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, a versatile medication, offers numerous benefits. It inhibits flu and RSV viral replication, reduces inflammation, improves the gut microbiome, aids athletic performance, and possesses anti-cancer properties. Moreover, it revolutionized veterinary medicine and is safe and affordable. In comparison, Molnupiravir falls short in COVID-19 treatment. Ivermectin shows a 62% improvement with 99 studies and costs $1 per pill, while Molnupiravir only shows a 15% improvement with 34 studies and costs $707 per pill. Ivermectin's potential has been undermined due to its threat to the lucrative vaccine industry. Its effectiveness had to be discredited to protect the $200 billion vaccine enterprise.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving #1 - It inhibits flu and RSV viral replication, which is why it’s included in the FLCCC flu and RSV protocols. #2 - It reduces inflammation throughout the body. #3 - Improves the gastrointestinal microbiome by boosting levels of the probiotic Bifidobacterium. #4 - It revolutionized veterinary medicine and arguably stabilized the world’s food supply. #5 - May help with athletic and sports performance by boosting cellular energy output in the heart. #6 - It has profound anti-cancer properties. Best of all, Ivermectin is incredibly safe and cheap. When you compare Molnupiravir and Ivermectin head-to-head in the context of COVID-19, you can see what a disgraceful, overpriced stink-bomb Molnupiravir actually is: Ivermectin: 62% improvement, 99 studies, $1 per pill Merck’s Show Pony: 15% improvement, 34 studies, $707 per pill This information was gathered from an article written by @MDMichaelTurner (give him a follow). Read the full in-depth article in the comment below:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

ARTICLE: 6 Secrets of Ivermectin - The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Articles: Ivermectin: The Untold Story of a 'Miracle Drug' https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-untold-story-of-a-miracle-drug-4952578?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf

The Untold Story of a 'Miracle Drug' theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever https://vigilantnews.com/post/lessons-from-ivermectin-why-stockpiling-life-saving-drugs-is-more-important-than-ever

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever Ivermectin, a Nobel-Prize-winning human medicine, is often touted as "one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era." Leading doctors believe this drug could have potentially curbed the pandemic at its outset. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory's Answer Will Shock You https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-you-overdose-on-ivermectin-dr-pierre-korys-answer-will-shock-you

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory's Answer Will Shock You "One of the safest drugs in history." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action. https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He believes this is evidence of a conspiracy, as the medication in question, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy. He suggests that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were discredited to protect the vaccine industry, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if there are existing effective medications. Acknowledging the effectiveness of these medications would have undermined the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw the CNN thing where they made my face yellow and said I was taking horse medication, which is that the most the to say that and repeat that over and over again is such a clear indication that they conspired. It's such a because it's this it's uniform. Farm. It's horse dewormer, uniform, a medication that's used far more often in human beings. It's been prescribed to Speaker 1: for Bill billions. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's insane. And the fact that Speaker 1: And won the Nobel Prize for for efficacy in humans. Speaker 0: Yeah. In humans. Yeah. It was wild. It was just wild. Speaker 1: They had to do it. They had to discredit Ivermectin because, you know, Because there's a federal law the federal law the emergency use authorization statute says that you cannot issue You you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that had that is demonstrated effective against the target illness. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200,000,000,000 vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin: The Truth - by legendary filmmaker Mikki Willis (@Plandemic3Movie). https://t.co/fKvLzszaIw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the controversy surrounding the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. While some claim it is a safe and effective medicine, others argue that it is a horse dewormer with no clinical evidence of its efficacy. The video highlights the smear campaign against Ivermectin and suggests that powerful forces, including pharmaceutical companies, may be suppressing its use. It also mentions the positive results seen in countries like India and Peru where Ivermectin was used as part of a multi-drug approach. The video raises concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the media and the manipulation of clinical studies. Overall, it presents Ivermectin as a potentially effective treatment that has been unfairly maligned.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of all the harmful misinformation spread over the past couple of years, one of the most disturbing false narratives was targeted at the Nobel Prize winning human medicine, Ivermectin. What you're about to see will reveal the motive behind the smear campaign against one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era. A medicine that, according to the numerous top scientists I've interviewed this year, could have ended the pandemic before it began. Speaker 1: So things are clearly bad, but they're being made even worse by people who have refused to take the vaccine and instead are swallowing horse paste. Speaker 2: Horse dewormer. There's no clinical evidence that indicates that this works. Speaker 3: It goes beyond that. We actually know that It doesn't work. Speaker 4: Ivermectin is ineffective against COVID, but could put you in a coma. Speaker 2: It can kill you. Speaker 4: It can kill you. Speaker 5: Turns out I got COVID. So we immediately threw the kitchen sink at it. All kinds of meds, monoclonal antibodies, Ivermectin. Speaker 6: One of those drugs he mentioned, Ivermectin, is something more often used to deworm horses. Speaker 7: We should Speaker 5: talk about that. That bothered you. It should bother you too. They're lying at your network about people taking human drugs versus drugs for the veterinary. Speaker 6: Calling it a horse to wormer is not a flattering thing. Speaker 8: I get that. Speaker 5: It's a lie. Speaker 8: They they shouldn't have said Speaker 9: Why did they Speaker 5: do that? I don't know. You're the medical guy over there. Speaker 6: Ivermectin can be a very effective medication. Speaker 8: You are more likely to die from taking Tylenol than Ivermectin, yet the FDA calls this a dangerous Horse deworming medicine. Speaker 10: What initially led this was an FDA Twitter account that use the term y'all to express denigration of Ivermectin as a horse drug. I have horses. The truth is that the dose that's used for horses by body weight is the same dose that's recommended for humans, But it's formulated and manufactured to a quality standard that's very different. Speaker 6: Lots of medicines are used in both animals and humans. So it's not a sufficient argument Somebody to say, it's a horse dewormer. Speaker 11: Yesterday, the CDC put out a national advisory on this warning the whole country against taking this Drug Ivermectin formulated for horses and cows and sheep. Speaker 12: With that, memo fired to every doctor, then Suddenly, me and all my early treatment colleagues around the country, we were faced with problems like we'd never had before. Speaker 4: I work as an emergency room doctor. And And not only an emergency room doctor, I teach advanced trauma life support, a course to other doctors that wanna work in the emergency room on how to stabilize patients. We were being told there's nothing you can do. Just wait for Fauci and the FDA to acknowledge a vaccine that they were gonna create, and there's no treatment, they said. Why would you want to decrease access to quality, life saving, measures for people who are fighting a worldwide pandemic? Speaker 9: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw a doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, Safe and effective drug for the application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 12: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ICU doctors, Collectively, we're some of the most highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 9: As we sit here today, I'm the most published person in my field in history. But when COVID nineteen hit, my clinical and academic world was turned upside down. Speaker 13: Twitter, in its wisdom, has decided to suspend the account of doctor Robert Malone. Now Robert Malone happens to be the inventor of the mRNA technology of making vaccines. His Twitter account has been suspended because he was allegedly spreading Misinformation on COVID nineteen vaccines. Let that sink in. Speaker 12: We have made contributions to our field for decades. So when we find ourselves, like, dismissed, you know, and they'll do that to anyone. You're suddenly fringe. Speaker 2: Touted as a miracle prevention and cure by far right commentators and anti vaxxers. Speaker 10: I'm not, although I've been characterized as a Right wing Proud Boy, this is a bipartisan issue, and the physicians represented here are truly a bipartisan group. Speaker 12: Our lives started going sideways professionally. Right. Paul started getting numerous complaints against him that he's never had in his career. Speaker 8: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people Die. Speaker 14: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products and related Authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, Preventing or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the US. Speaker 10: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then the logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products, is no longer supportable. Speaker 12: The war on Ivermectin is waged by very powerful Full forces with a lot of money. I mean, public health was built on a obsessive global vaccination policy, which Ivermectin would have threatened. Speaker 11: We've got Pfizer's Q3 earnings. Revenue, they're projecting to be 98 To $102,000,000,000. Pfizer, Speaker 15: BioNTech, and Moderna. Do you know how much profit they made from these shots? $1,000 every second from Wuhan virus vaccines. Speaker 12: You're talking about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in geopolitical implications That would be significantly affected if the people had access to a safe and widely available medicine. Speaker 16: This is an incredibly cheap drug. It's off license. It's generic. It can be manufactured in huge amounts in India. Remarkably low cost. Speaker 14: Merck's patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996. In 2021, Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective Treatment against COVID nineteen and bizarrely claimed, quote, a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. It was plenty safe for Merck to distribute widely when it was still under patent, But now they're claiming the safety record is insufficient. Speaker 10: Folks need to understand that just because there is an article out there that asserts that something is false recognize that those are paid. Speaker 7: Every major media outlet in the United States shares at least 1 board member with at least 1 drug company. Let me put it in perspective for you. These board members wake up, they go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, and then they have their driver take them over to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of Programming that network is gonna air. They can't be honest and objective about big pharma because big pharma pays their bills. Speaker 17: In fact, one analysis claimed 9 out of the top 10 drugmakers spent more on marketing than they did on research. Speaker 18: CNN tonight, Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Speaker 0: Brought to Speaker 8: you by Pfizer. Speaker 18: Brought to you by Fiserv Royal Wedding is brought to you by brought to you by Fiserv. Fiserv. Speaker 19: If asked the question, Did you know how much influence your former employer had on big media and so on? I have no idea. It is clear that the pharmaceutical industry has has a great deal of sway on what goes on. If you can shape the message, then you can shape the world, and that's what they've done. Speaker 13: When was Speaker 9: the last time you turned on the news and ever got an update about how the rest of the world is handling COVID? Speaker 12: A group of South African doctors has launched an urgent court Cajun. They are seeking easier access to Ivermectin. Speaker 20: Globally, at least 5 countries want to use Ivermectin to treat COVID nineteen, Including India and Argentina. There are numerous concrete tests in medical journals around the world that Ivermectin Does work. Speaker 9: The earliest reports we had, one of them we had in Peru, where they got into a good mode of using multidrug Treatment with an Ivermectin based approach that they were crushing their curves. Speaker 2: And the president of the Tokyo Medical Association announced to all doctors during a summer surge That they should use Ivermectin in the treatment. Within weeks, the hospitalization rates reported out of Japan Were lower than at any other time in the pandemic. Speaker 9: The real proof positive came when COVID-nineteen really hit hard in Mexico City. They finally, after lots of struggle, came with an Ivermectin based multi drug approach, and literally cleared out the hospitals. And then we had reports all the way through that various states in India. Speaker 21: In India, the government has been widely promoting the use of Ivermectin. State leaders have just declared that Uttar Pradesh is now officially COVID free. A region with nearly as many people as the entire United States is totally COVID free. Speaker 12: The miracle success of Uttar Pradesh, not one mention of Ivermectin being used. Speaker 22: In the countries that it has been used, in the countries where the studies are, the results are not good. They are overwhelming. They are well over 90% success rate. Speaker 12: In the Speaker 2: United States, it's a horse dewormer. It's horse based, and only the illiterate, ignorant, and and or unvaccinated use it. Speaker 10: The key paradox Is if you look at the mortality rate in the United States, one of the most highly funded medical care systems in the world, And what we find is the mortality in the United States is among the worst in the world. Speaker 2: If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there's only one way to understand them. They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies. They can design trials to fail to disprove the use of cheap medicines, And they can make things appear that they don't work. Speaker 10: I sit as a nonvoting member of the active committee for drugs with NIH. I've seen the dynamics of what are going on with all those trials, which most of which have failed. Unfortunately, it's imminently possible to manipulate the outcomes of a clinical study. If you want a study to fail, that's dead easy. Speaker 12: Now, their 4th quote unquote negative study of Ivermectin in a major medical journal, and each time is a media frenzy. Speaker 3: There was a systematic review looking at Randomized controlled trials that have been done, and they found that there was no benefit for Ivermectin in reducing mortality, death to COVID nineteen, No reduction in symptoms or duration of symptoms for COVID nineteen, so it does not work. Speaker 19: People need to understand that academics Have been threatened with losing their position and threatened with getting no further research grants If they speak out against the narrative, guess why that is? 2 thirds of the world's non commercial biological research is funded by just 3 bodies. The Wellcome Trust in the UK, the NIH, And specifically the NIAID under Tony Fauci and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Speaker 10: There's this pattern that is consistent with A concerted effort to mislead the public by withholding information using modern technology, media, censorship, really, let's call it what it is, thought control. Speaker 23: He could actually control, Exactly what people think. And that is the that is our job. Yeah. Speaker 12: Whenever you have clear cut evidence that a drug works, You have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people know so that they could have access. Speaker 6: What are you telling people is the Is the optimal profile. Speaker 24: I want a pill, orally administered, single pill Given for 7 to 10 days, little drug drug interaction and low toxicity. Give me that, and I'll be really happy. Speaker 21: Ivermectin has been used safely for decades, has no known drug interactions, won a Nobel Prize for its success treating humans, And is on the WHO's list of the safest, most effective medicines in the entire world. Speaker 10: And it showed an 86% effectiveness to Prevent people from contracting COVID. Speaker 6: Ivermectin has been used over 4,000,000,000 times and it's used for a wide variety of treatments. Ivermectin has been shown Speaker 21: known to possess different anti inflammation, antiviral, and antitumor properties. Speaker 3: Clinical studies abroad suggest It works. Speaker 13: All the studies show that it does have a positive effect. Speaker 22: That is the thing about Ivermectin. It's not good. It's great. Speaker 12: I have never seen an evidence base This large with 81 controlled trials, 10 years of in vitro studies in the lab against a dozen RNA viruses, All showing that Ivermectin stops replication. It literally is, in my mind, the single greatest public health achievement in our history of affection control in the world.
VigilantFox
Posted - November 4, 2023 at 12:50 AM
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 4:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, hailed for its impact on human health and Nobel Prize win, posed a threat to the lucrative vaccine industry worth $200 billion. To comply with the Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute, which prohibits emergency use authorization if an effective existing medication exists, ivermectin had to be discredited. Acknowledging its effectiveness would have jeopardized the vaccine enterprise.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how CNN portrayed them as taking horse medication, specifically Ivermectin, which is actually a medication used more commonly in humans. They mention that Ivermectin has been prescribed to billions of people and even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. The speaker believes that Ivermectin had to be discredited because of a federal law that states emergency use authorization for vaccines cannot be issued if there is an existing medication proven effective against the target illness. They argue that acknowledging the effectiveness of Ivermectin would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw the CNN thing where they made my face yellow and said I was taking horse medication, which is that the most the to say that and repeat that over and over again is such a clear indication that they conspired. It's such a because it's this it's uniform. Farm. It's horse dewormer, uniform, a medication that's used far more often in human beings. It's been prescribed to Speaker 1: for Bill billions. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's insane. And the fact that Speaker 1: And won the Nobel Prize for for efficacy in humans. Speaker 0: Yeah. In humans. Yeah. It was wild. It was just wild. Speaker 1: They had to do it. They had to discredit Ivermectin because, you know, Because there's a federal law the federal law the emergency use authorization statute says that you cannot issue You you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that had that is demonstrated effective against the target illness. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200,000,000,000 vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.
VigilantFox
Posted - November 4, 2023 at 5:37 PM
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 2:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Oncologist Dr. Makis highlights extensive research supporting the use of Ivermectin in cancer treatment. Higher doses have shown to inhibit cancer cell growth, metastasis, and induce cell death. Dr. Makis is known for his remarkable work in finding solutions to mitigate vaccine harm. Other posts discuss the devastating impact of late-stage cancers, sudden deaths among fitness enthusiasts and actors, and potential treatments for vaccine-induced cancers. Ivermectin and Fenbendazole are mentioned as promising drugs for cancer treatment. RFK Jr. emphasizes the benefits of Ivermectin, while also revealing the alleged efforts to discredit it due to its threat to the vaccine industry. Lastly, the safety and effectiveness of Ivermectin are highlighted, with over 3.7 billion doses administered.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Oncologist: “There Is Now Extensive Research to Support Ivermectin Use in Treating Cancer” Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action, reported @MakisMD in a recent article. “They [researchers] have found that if you give higher doses of Ivermectin than what’s been used for COVID-19, that it actually can stop the growth of these cancer cells, it can stop their metastases, and it can actually engage apoptosis and autophagy and kill these cancer cells.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin, known for its use in treating COVID-19, has also shown promise in treating aggressive cancers like glioblastomas, stage 4 breast and colon cancers, pancreatic cancers, gallbladder cancers, renal cancers, and melanomas. Research suggests that higher doses of Ivermectin can halt the growth and metastasis of these cancer cells, inducing apoptosis and autophagy to kill them. It is worth considering Ivermectin as a potential treatment for these turbo cancers, in addition to its effectiveness against viral outbreaks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now Ivermectin has been used to treat COVID nineteen. What's interesting is that though and I've reviewed the research extensively on this. There is now extensive research to support Ivermectin use in treating cancer and in particularly the aggressive cancers, the types of aggressive cancers we're seeing in COVID nineteen vaccinated individuals, the turbo cancers. So for example, the glioblastomas, which are you know, the grade 4, the brain cancers that are really terminal, if you get diagnosed with that, you know, you may die within a few months. Ivermectin may actually help with those. The stage 4 breast cancers, the stage 4 colon cancers, pancreatic cancers, gallbladder cancers, renal cancers, melanomas, these are cancers that have actually been studied with Ivermectin, you know, they're very aggressive cancers and they have found that if you give higher doses of Ivermectin than what's been used for COVID nineteen, that it actually can stop the growth of these cancer cells, it can stop their metastases, and that it can actually, you know, engage apoptosis and autophagy and kill these cancer cells. So I wanted to just bring that up. Mhmm. You know, we have the Ivermectin in the in the emergency kit. So any kind of future viral outbreak. Vivermectin is fantastic for that, but people should also look into the possibility of Ivermectin potentially treating some of these extremely aggressive turbo cancers as well.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. William Makis is the Chief of Oncology @twc_health, and is, in my opinion, one of the best medical researchers on the planet. He's been doing incredible work finding solutions to mitigate the harm from the shots. Give him a follow: --> @MakisMD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@twc_health @MakisMD More insights from Dr. Makis: Late-Stage Cancers Are Devastating Students After College Vaccine Mandates https://vigilantnews.com/post/oncologist-late-stage-cancers-are-devastating-students-after-college-vaccine-mandates

Oncologist: Late-Stage Cancers Are Devastating Students After College Vaccine Mandates This isn't normal. This is criminal. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Fitness enthusiasts, not just athletes, are dying suddenly. https://vigilantnews.com/post/fitness-enthusiasts-are-dying-suddenly-16-sudden-deaths-examined

Fitness enthusiasts are dying suddenly - 16 sudden deaths examined Personal trainers, fitness instructors & influencers, jiu-jitsu, crossfit, gym goers - high risk of sudden death! vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Matthew Perry is not the only actor to die unexpectedly this year. There are at least 33 more. https://vigilantnews.com/post/actors-dying-suddenly-matthew-perry-age-54-tyler-christopher-age-50-are-the-most-recent-losses

ACTORS Dying suddenly - Matthew Perry (age 54), Tyler Christopher (age 50) are the most recent losses Matthew Perry is not the only actor to die unexpectedly this year. There are at least 33 more. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

C19 Vaccine-Induced “Turbo Cancers” May Be Treatable By Popular Sleep Medication https://vigilantnews.com/post/oncologist-c19-vaccine-induced-turbo-cancers-may-be-treatable-by-popular-sleep-medication

Oncologist: C19 Vaccine-Induced “Turbo Cancers” May Be Treatable By Popular Sleep Medication “Melatonin has been shown to treat breast, colon, lung, hepatobiliary, ovarian and prostate cancers - which just happen to also be the same cancers that show up after Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination but in Stage 4 Turbo variety,” says Dr. William Makis. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vaccine Injury Treatment - Fasting for 48-72 hours creates autophagy - the body's detox process that kills COVID-19 vaccine spike protein damaged cells and reboots the immune system. https://vigilantnews.com/post/vaccine-injury-treatment-fasting-for-48-72-hours-creates-autophagy-the-bodys-detox-process-that-kills-covid-19-vaccine-spike-protein-damaged-cells-and-reboots-the-immune-system

Vaccine Injury Treatment - Fasting for 48-72 hours creates autophagy - the body's detox process that kills COVID-19 vaccine spike protein damaged cells and reboots the immune system The benefits of fasting on COVID-19 vaccine injuries, are now being looked at seriously in the scientific literature. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action. https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Fenbendazole is emerging as a “miracle drug” for cancer, and it’s Big Pharma’s worst nightmare. https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-overlooked-miracle-drug-for-cancer-why-big-pharma-fears-fenbendazole

The Overlooked Miracle Drug for Cancer? Why Big Pharma Fears Fenbendazole Fenbendazole is not going to make anyone rich, and in cancer treatments, that is a non-starter. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

More on Ivermectin: Ivermectin: The Untold Story of a 'Miracle Drug' https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-untold-story-of-a-miracle-drug-4952578?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf

The Untold Story of a 'Miracle Drug' theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever https://vigilantnews.com/post/lessons-from-ivermectin-why-stockpiling-life-saving-drugs-is-more-important-than-ever

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever Ivermectin, a Nobel-Prize-winning human medicine, is often touted as "one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era." Leading doctors believe this drug could have potentially curbed the pandemic at its outset. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory's Answer Will Shock You https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-you-overdose-on-ivermectin-dr-pierre-korys-answer-will-shock-you

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory's Answer Will Shock You "One of the safest drugs in history." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Unloads the Truth About Ivermectin to The Hill: “It Was Really a Miracle Drug” “There are now 100 studies that show that Ivermectin had profound benefits. Generally speaking, a 70% to 85% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths,” reported Kennedy. “It was really a miracle drug.” He also noted that many, many studies showed “extreme benefits, like devastating benefits of ivermectin.” But there were a handful of government and WHO-produced studies, some financed by Bill Gates, that concluded there was no benefit of Ivermectin. “Those studies have a lot of problems,” contended Kennedy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are numerous studies showing the significant benefits of Ivermectin, with a 70 to 85% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths. It has been effective worldwide, including in countries like Nigeria, which has the highest burden of river blindness but the lowest COVID death rate. They use both Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Similarly, states in India like Kerala and Uttar Pradesh had comparable death rates by following a protocol that included Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. There are over 400 studies supporting the benefits of hydroxychloroquine and nearly 100 studies showing the devastating benefits of Ivermectin. However, a few government-produced studies financed by Bill Gates and the WHO claim no benefit, but these studies have been criticized.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are now a 100 studies that show that Ivermectin had profound benefits in generally speaking, a 70 to 85% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths. It it was really a miracle drug, particularly in the later pandemic. I don't think if that was all in, like, Bangladesh or South America, it could be because of the people not parasites. It was all over the world, and and the the countries where they use it for parasites, Nigeria, which has the highest river blindness burden in the world, did have the lowest COVID death rate in the world. The they use both they also have the biggest malaria burden, so virtually the entire population is on my on hydroxychloroquine, and a large part of the population is on Ivermectin for the river blindness, so, and they had almost no vaccination. They had, I think, 1, like something like one point 30% vaccination, so they did very well, but there are states in India, sort of side by side states like Kerala and Uttar Pradesh used our protocol and had the same, comparable death rates and Uttar Pradesh use ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and ended the pandemic overnight, but there's there's also if you go in the literature and there's a there's a doctor called Meryl Masse who has assembled a lot of these, so you can go on her website and see them, or Harvey Riesch who's the Yale epidemiologist has also assembled them. There's 400 studies that show benefits from Hydroxychloroquine. Over almost a 100 studies, I think 99, that show extreme benefits like devastating benefits of Ivermectin, and, and there's a handful of studies that are government produced, WHO produced, finance by Bill Gates that say that there was no benefit, but those studies have a lot of problems.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He argues that this portrayal is a clear indication of a conspiracy, as the medication in question, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. The speaker believes that Ivermectin had to be discredited in order to promote the COVID-19 vaccines, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if there is an existing effective medication. Acknowledging Ivermectin's effectiveness would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw the CNN thing where they made my face yellow and said I was taking horse medication, which is that the most the to say that and repeat that over and over again is such a clear indication that they conspired. It's such a because it's this it's uniform. Farm. It's horse dewormer, uniform, a medication that's used far more often in human beings. It's been prescribed to Speaker 1: for Bill billions. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's insane. And the fact that Speaker 1: And won the Nobel Prize for for efficacy in humans. Speaker 0: Yeah. In humans. Yeah. It was wild. It was just wild. Speaker 1: They had to do it. They had to discredit Ivermectin because, you know, Because there's a federal law the federal law the emergency use authorization statute says that you cannot issue You you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that had that is demonstrated effective against the target illness. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200,000,000,000 vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“Completely Safe!” - You Are More Likely to Die from Tylenol Than You Are From Ivermectin • Its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015 • Recognized, 2nd to penicillin, for having the greatest impact on human health • Has brought river blindness to the brink of elimination • Over 3.7B doses administered Dr. Marik: “If you have a sick patient, [and] you have a drug that’s completely safe, a drug that is cheap, what in the heck have you got to lose by trying this drug?” Full Interview: https://bit.ly/Paul-Marik

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a prevention protocol and an early treatment protocol. In the early treatment protocol, we use Ivermectin, which is not a horse dewormer. The claim that it's toxic is a complete lie. Over 3.7 billion doses of Ivermectin have been given to humans, making it one of the most influential drugs after penicillin. It is completely safe, even safer than Tylenol. While its efficacy can be debated, if you have limited options and a sick patient, why not try a safe and affordable drug like Ivermectin? There's nothing to lose.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have a, a, you know, a prevention protocol, and then we have an early treatment protocol. Early treatment protocol, we use Ivermectin, which is not a horse dewormer. So that that was a propaganda campaign, which was orchestrated by the FDA and is a complete and utter lie. They claim it's a toxic horse dewormer. So let's be clear, 3,700,000,000 doses of Ivermectin Actin have been given to human beings, and after penicillin, it has had the greatest influence on the health of the humanity on this planet by complete by almost eradicating a whole number of parasitic diseases. It is completely safe. I don't know how to stress it enough. It is completely safe. So you're more likely to die from Tylenol, you're more likely to die from Tylenol than you are from Ivermectin. So, you know, we could argue about its efficacy. We believe it's an effective drug. But, you know, if, you have very few options, What is there to lose? If you have a sick patient, you have a drug that's completely safe, a drug that is cheap. What in what in the heck have you got to lose by trying this drug?
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you appreciate these information threads and never want to miss a post, please hit the notification bell 🔔 on my profile page. --> @VigilantFox https://t.co/GJqSkoSEgO

VigilantFox
Posted - November 6, 2023 at 4:33 PM
Saved - November 6, 2023 at 9:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, is on the WHO's essential list. It has safely treated river blindness in 33 countries for years. With over 3.7 billion doses administered, it has an excellent safety record. Numerous studies and meta-analyses confirm its effectiveness in reducing mortality, hospitalization rates, and Covid-19 risk. For more details, check out the article by @sonia_elijah.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

5 Quick Facts About Ivermectin: Public Enemy #1 #5 - Its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. #4 - Included in the World Health Organization's essential list of medicines. #3 - Has safely cured people of river blindness in 33 countries for decades. #2 - Over 3.7 billion doses have been administered with an immaculate safety profile. #1 - To date, there have been 31 RCTs (Randomized Controlled Trials), 64 controlled studies, and 7 meta-analyses of the RCTs done on ivermectin. All of them found that ivermectin significantly reduced mortality and hospitalization rates as well as the risk of contracting Covid-19. This information was gathered from an article written by investigative journalist @sonia_elijah (give her a follow). Read the full piece in the comment below:

VigilantFox
Posted - November 9, 2023 at 10:38 PM
Saved - November 10, 2023 at 4:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 1980s, vaccine manufacturers faced huge losses due to injury lawsuits. They demanded liability protections, leading to the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act. This act eliminated liability, safety testing, and injury lawsuits, making vaccines a profitable "dream product." RFK Jr. highlights the dangers of the COVID jab, citing VAERS reports. He also emphasizes the benefits of Ivermectin, which threatened the lucrative vaccine industry. The existence of effective alternatives like Ivermectin had to be discredited to protect the vaccine enterprise. RFK Jr. continues to expose the truth and faces criticism as a "conspiracy theorist."

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act was then signed, which turned vaccines into a "dream product." Here's why: #1 - There's no liability, therefore no incentive to perform safety testing. #2 - No liability means no injury lawsuits, which means big savings for the vaccine manufacturers. #3 - The need for advertising and marketing is also eliminated because the products are mandated for kids to go to school. "If you could get your vaccine onto the CDC mandatory schedule. It's worth about a billion dollars in profit to your company for every vaccine every year," denoted @RobertKennedyJr Repost and follow for more informative content. Related stories are attached in the thread below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1980s, a tetanus and pertussis vaccine called DTP was used, but it caused brain damage and death in African children. Vaccine companies faced lawsuits and losses, so they went to Congress and threatened to stop making vaccines unless they were granted immunity from liability. In 1986, a law was passed granting them immunity, which eliminated the need for testing and ensured no liability for injuries. This made vaccines a profitable product, as they were mandated for millions of children and had high profit margins. The government purchased a large portion of these vaccines, making it a lucrative industry. As a result, the number of vaccines on the schedule increased from 3 to 72 doses by 1989.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the early eighties, we started using a the area of tetanus and pertussis vaccine called DTP vaccine. It's no longer used in the United States or Europe. We still give it to African kids. It's causing a horrendous brain damage in children and killing a lot of children. Vaccine companies, Wyeth said, for every dollar it was making on that vaccine, it was losing 20 in lawsuits, in damage losses. And and YF went to Congress with the other vaccine makers and they were the biggest number one contributor to lobbying. And they told Congress, we're gonna stop making vaccines unless you give it because they cannot be safely made. He said, we can't make the DTP safely. A certain number of people are gonna get injured, are gonna get killed. No matter what we do, we cannot make it safely. And we're gonna stop making them all together, all vaccines, if if you don't give us immunity from liability. So Congress, Democratic Congress, Republican president Ronald Reagan signed that bill into law in 1986, suddenly, the industry the pharmaceutical industry looked ground. And they said, holy cow, now we have a product that has you don't have to say if you test it. That's a huge cause statement because that usually costs $100,000,000 minimum. You don't have to and there's no liability at the end, even if you injure people, which means there's no incentive to make it safe. And they but it also saves the industry. The biggest cause for every other medicine are liability suits when they injure people. And so the industry says, here's something. The 2 biggest costs, We now are now eliminated. And then the 3rd cost, which is advertising and marketing, is also eliminated because this product is gonna be mandated to the 78,000,000 kids, and there's very, very high margins. The government is gonna buy half those vaccines for 4 children. It's like the dream product. If you could get your vaccine onto the naturi schedule. It's worth about $1,000,000,000 in profit to your company for every vaccine every year for for every vaccine you can get on that schedule. So there was a gold rush at the CDC to put new vaccines on the schedule. And we went from the 3 vaccines that I have a kid to the 72 doses today. And that really, that big change began in 1989.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Tells Hostile C-Span Caller Why the COVID Jab Is the Most Dangerous Vaccine in History. "VAERS reports have shown that there have been more reports of deaths and injuries from [the C19 shot in] VAERS than all vaccines combined since 1986. So, by the only measure that the CDC uses, it is the most dangerous vaccine and has killed more people than any other vaccine in history." Kennedy continued. "It's unfair, I think, to come to me and say that I've cited VAERS, which is a bad system, admittedly, but it's not bad because it overcounts vaccine injuries. It's bad because it undercounts them by a hundredfold. And that's CDC's own peer-reviewed studies that show that."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes Mr. Kennedy for spreading disinformation about COVID vaccines. They mention an incident where Kennedy used unvetted data from VARs to claim that vaccines were killing people, leading to vaccine hesitancy and unnecessary deaths. The speaker calls this science denial and questions Kennedy's credibility. In response, Kennedy argues that VARs is an unreliable system for reporting vaccine adverse events due to voluntary reporting. He claims that CDC's own studies show that VARs undercounts vaccine injuries by a hundredfold. Kennedy also mentions a Harvard study that developed a more accurate system, but CDC allegedly shut it down and refused to address the issue. Kennedy questions why CDC doesn't have a better system in place.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Pedro. Mister Kennedy, you speak about peer review and, trying to help people. How is it that you expect people to believe you when you provide all types of disinformation? Let me give you one example that I don't believe can be refuted by a constant filibuster that you keep, relying on to to answer questions? There was a you appeared at the Louisiana State Legislature? You may recall that you you claimed that the vaccine, the COVID vaccines that is, we're killing people, and you use the data from VARs, the unvetted data that had not been vetted for it's, it's it's, authenticity as to which people had died from COVID or which people died with COVID? And you cited that as evidence for the vaccine killing people. And this has fueled teen hesitancy and responsible for countless deaths, amongst the people who overwhelmingly die from COVID, who are unvaccinated? This is absolutely unacceptable to the American people. You talked about feudalism. This is Byzantine. This is this is science denial? There are other instances, for example Well, let's keep it to that one only because of our time and we have other callers. So Mr. Kennedy, go ahead and you can respond. Speaker 1: Yeah. So, you know, you raise an interesting issue, which is, is the VAERS system reliable? And VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, it is the system, the primary system. And today, the only system that is used by CDC to test vaccine safety, The system is not a good system and people have known that for many, many years. But it's the only And in fact, the reason that it's a poor system is that it relies on voluntary reporting. And so you need a doctor if you, for example, receive the vaccine, you die 17 days later And your doctor then needs to report that to VAERS and say this was a potential vaccine. Most doctors aren't going to do that because they don't see the connection and that kind of system doesn't work. You need a machine counting system That actually can do a cluster analysis and that is it does not rely On voluntary human reporting, which is biased. Nevertheless, VAERS reports have there have been more reports of deaths and injuries from VAERS than all vaccines combined Since 1986. It is, you know, by the only measure that CDC has that it uses, It is the most dangerous vaccine and has killed more people than anybody, than any other vaccine in history. I want to say this, that this system has been criticized for many, many years, including David Kessler, who is The former attorney or a Surgeon General who said, you know, this fact this system undercounts vaccine injuries By many, many by orders of magnitude. So CDC retained a Harvard and a group of Scientists at Harvard to develop a new system, a machine counting system that would collect all of the vaccine injuries and do it accurately. In 2010, it was led by a team of scientists the team of scientists was led by a scientist called Lazarus And they developed a system that worked very well. They tried it out on the one HMO, which is called Harvard Pilgrim. And they were going to unroll it. If it worked at Harvard Pilgrim, which it did, they were supposed to unroll it to all of the HMO data. But what happened is they came back and they said, this works. And what we're finding is when we compare it to the old system, That the old system is actually collecting less than 1% of vaccine injuries. So anybody can look this study up. It's It's called the Lazarus study. They developed a system. They said CDC was telling people at that time that the vaccines were injuring 1 in a 1000000 people. What Lazarus found was that 2.7, about 1 in every 36 people were getting injured. So it's a horrendous injury rate. They reported that to CDC and CDC then went silent. And that the description of that interaction, the CDC, when it saw This huge magnitude of vaccine injury shut down the system and refused to unroll it and refused to talk to the very scientists that they had retained. Okay. During COVID, I just want to say this, during COVID, they developed another system called V Safe, Which was confirming this horrendous rate of injury. And about 2 weeks ago when they started to unroll the new Vaccine, the new boosters, CDC mysteriously shut down the V Safe system. So, you know, You shouldn't really come to me. It's unfair, I think, to come to me and say that I cited FAERS, You know, which is a bad system admittedly, but it's not bad because it over counts vaccine injuries is bad because it under counts them by a hundredfold. And that's CDC's own peer reviewed studies that show that and why doesn't the question you should really be asking is Why doesn't CDC have a system that works?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Unloads the Truth About Ivermectin to The Hill: “It Was Really a Miracle Drug” “There are now 100 studies that show that Ivermectin had profound benefits. Generally speaking, a 70% to 85% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths,” reported Kennedy. “It was really a miracle drug.” He also noted that many, many studies showed “extreme benefits, like devastating benefits of ivermectin.” But there were a handful of government and WHO-produced studies, some financed by Bill Gates, that concluded there was no benefit of Ivermectin. “Those studies have a lot of problems,” contended Kennedy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 100 studies have shown that Ivermectin has had significant benefits, reducing hospitalizations and deaths by 70 to 85%. It was effective worldwide, including in Nigeria, where they used it for river blindness and had the lowest COVID death rate. Similarly, states in India like Kerala and Uttar Pradesh used our protocol with Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, ending the pandemic overnight. There are around 400 studies supporting the benefits of hydroxychloroquine and nearly 100 studies showing the devastating benefits of Ivermectin. However, a few government-produced studies financed by Bill Gates and the WHO claim no benefit, but these studies have been criticized.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are now a 100 studies that show that Ivermectin had profound benefits in generally speaking, a 70 to 85% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths. It it was really a miracle drug, particularly in the later pandemic. I don't think if that was all in, like, Bangladesh or South America, it could be because of the people not parasites. It was all over the world, and and the the countries where they use it for parasites, Nigeria, which has the highest river blindness burden in the world, did have the lowest COVID death rate in the world. The they use both they also have the biggest malaria burden, so virtually the entire population is on my on hydroxychloroquine, and a large part of the population is on Ivermectin for the river blindness, so, and they had almost no vaccination. They had, I think, 1, like something like one point 30% vaccination, so they did very well, but there are states in India, sort of side by side states like Kerala and Uttar Pradesh used our protocol and had the same, comparable death rates and Uttar Pradesh use ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and ended the pandemic overnight, but there's there's also if you go in the literature and there's a there's a doctor called Meryl Masse who has assembled a lot of these, so you can go on her website and see them, or Harvey Riesch, who's the Yale epidemiologist, has also assembled them. There's 400 studies that show benefits from Hydroxychloroquine. Over almost a 100 studies, I think 99, that show extreme benefits like devastating benefits of Ivermectin, and, and there's a handful of studies that are government produced, WHO produced, finance by Bill Gates that say that there was no benefit, but those studies have a lot of problems.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He criticizes the repeated claims and believes it shows a conspiracy. He clarifies that the medication, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy. The speaker suggests that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were discredited to protect the vaccine industry, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization if there is an existing effective medication. Acknowledging the effectiveness of these medications would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine enterprise.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw the CNN thing where they made my face yellow and said I was taking horse medication, which is that the most the to say that and repeat that over and over again is such a clear indication that they conspired. It's such a because it's this it's uniform. Farm. It's horse dewormer, uniform, a medication that's used far more often in human beings. It's been prescribed to Speaker 1: for Bill billions. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's insane. And the fact that Speaker 1: And won the Nobel Prize for for efficacy in humans. Speaker 0: Yeah. In humans. Yeah. It was wild. It was just wild. Speaker 1: They had to do it. They had to discredit Ivermectin because, you know, Because there's a federal law the federal law the emergency use authorization statute says that you cannot issue You you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that had that is demonstrated effective against the target illness. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200,000,000,000 vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

ARTICLE: RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-identifies-the-real-shooter-behind-his-fathers-death

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death “When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me, as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Wins the Day With an Epic Response to Being Called a 'Conspiracy Theorist' https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-wins-the-day-responds-to-c-span-caller-who-labels-him-a-conspiracy-theorist-with-intellect-tact-and-grace

RFK Jr. Wins the Day: Responds to C-Span Caller Who Labels Him a 'Conspiracy Theorist' with Intellect, Tact and Grace Robert Kennedy Jr. found himself in the hot seat, answering questions from a caller named Sharon, who accused him of being a conspiracy theorist. vigilantnews.com
VigilantFox
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 4:02 PM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 7:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, hailed as a significant medical breakthrough, threatens the lucrative vaccine industry. The FDA discredited its effectiveness to protect the $200 billion vaccine enterprise. However, studies show its potential in treating cancer and reducing excess deaths. Stockpiling life-saving drugs is crucial, and an overdose on ivermectin is a concern. Watch the documentary "The War on Ivermectin" for more information.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” RFK Jr. told Joe Rogan earlier this year: “They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA issues emergency use authorization for medical products when there are no approved alternatives. The effectiveness of Ivermectin as a treatment is questioned, as it would have affected the authorization of vaccines. Powerful forces with financial interests oppose Ivermectin, as it threatens global vaccination policies. Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna have made significant profits from COVID-19 vaccines. Ivermectin is a cheap and widely available drug, but its safety is disputed by Merck, despite distributing it when it was under patent. It is important to be cautious of articles that may be biased or paid for.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From the FDA, Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate, approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the U. S. Speaker 1: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then the logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products is no longer supportable. Speaker 2: The war on Ivermectin is waged by very powerful forces with a lot of money. I mean, Public health was built on a obsessive global vaccination policy, which Ivermectin would have threatened. We've got Pfizer's Q3 earnings. Revenue, they're projecting to be 98 to $102,000,000,000. Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna. Do you know how much profit they made from these shots? $1,000 every second from Wuhan virus vaccines. You're talking about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in geopolitical implications that would affected if the people had access to a safe and widely available medicine. Speaker 3: This is an incredibly cheap Drug. It's off license. It's generic. It can be manufactured in huge amounts in India, remarkably low cost. Speaker 0: Merck's patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996. In 2021, Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against COVID nineteen, and bizarrely claimed, quote, a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. It was plenty safe for Merck to distribute widely when it was still under patent, but now they're claiming the safety record is insufficient. Speaker 1: Folks need to understand that just because there is an article out there that asserts that something is false, recognize that those are paid.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

More stories on ivermectin from @VigilantNews: Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed/

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews “Ivermectin Worked!”: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds 74% Reduction in Excess Deaths https://vigilantnews.com/post/ivermectin-worked-peer-reviewed-study-finds-74-reduction-in-excess-deaths/

“Ivermectin Worked!”: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds 74% Reduction in Excess Deaths Let this be another tally mark for when the "conspiracy theorists" got it right all along. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews 6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving/

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving This article originally appeared on drturner.substack.com and was republished with permission.Guest post by Michael Turner, M.D.Greetings Dear Friends,Inspired anew by my recent podcast with my friend Dr. Kory (who must be considered the world's expert on the use of Ivermectin in COVID), I wanted to share some summary insights with you about this truly astonishing vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever https://vigilantnews.com/post/lessons-from-ivermectin-why-stockpiling-life-saving-drugs-is-more-important-than-ever/

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever Ivermectin, a Nobel-Prize-winning human medicine, is often touted as "one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era." Leading doctors believe this drug could have potentially curbed the pandemic at its outset. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory’s Answer Will Shock You https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-you-overdose-on-ivermectin-dr-pierre-korys-answer-will-shock-you/

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory’s Answer Will Shock You "One of the safest drugs in history." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Watch the full documentary, The War on Ivermectin, in the post below: https://x.com/PierreKory/status/1735410610316144761?s=20

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

Was just interviewed by Del Bigtree on The Highwire to premiere Mikki Willis's updated film "The War on Ivermectin" (great title, right?) and promote my book (tinyurl.com/The-War-On-Ive…) Check it out: https://t.co/ecQCUTureQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Rogan announced on social media that he has COVID and mentioned taking Ivermectin as part of his treatment. However, Ivermectin is primarily used as a dewormer for horses and is not proven to be effective against COVID. In fact, it can be dangerous and potentially deadly. The CDC and FDA have issued warnings against using Ivermectin for COVID. Some doctors claim that Ivermectin is effective and have faced backlash for advocating its use. There are allegations that pharmaceutical companies and the media have influenced the narrative against Ivermectin due to financial interests. Studies on Ivermectin have shown mixed results, but some countries have reported success in using it to treat COVID.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, breaking news this evening. Joe O'Rogan announced on social media today that he has COVID. Speaker 1: So we immediately threw the kitchen sink at it. All kinds of meds. Monoclonal antibodies, Ivermectin. Speaker 0: One of those drugs he mentioned, Ivermectin, is something more often used to deworm horses. Speaker 2: So things are clearly bad, but they're being made even worse by people who have refused to take the vaccine and instead are Dead or swallowing Speaker 0: horse dewormer. Speaker 3: Ivermectin is ineffective against COVID, Speaker 4: but could put you in a coma. Speaker 0: It can kill you. Speaker 5: It can kill you. Speaker 6: There's no clinical Evidence that indicates that this works. Speaker 7: It goes beyond that. We actually know that it doesn't work. Speaker 1: We should talk about that. That bothered you. It should bother You too. They're lying at your network about people taking human drugs versus drugs Speaker 0: for the Speaker 1: veterinary. It a horse dewormer is not a flattering thing. I get that. It's a lie. Speaker 0: They they shouldn't have said that. Speaker 3: Why did Speaker 8: they do that? Speaker 1: I don't know. You're the I've got a guy over there. Ivermectin can be a very effective medication. Speaker 5: Touted as a miracle prevention and cure by far Alright commentators and anti vaxxers, Ivermectin is a treatment for lice and Speaker 9: What initially led this was an FDA Twitter account that used the term y'all to express denigration of Ivermectin as a horse drug. The truth is that the dose that's used for horses by body weight is the same dose that's recommended for humans, but it's formulated and manufactured to a quality Standard is very different. Speaker 4: The CDC put out a national advisory on this warning the whole country against taking this drug Ivermectin formulated for horses and cows and sheep. Speaker 8: With that, memo fired to every doctor, then suddenly me and all my early treatment colleagues around the country, We were faced with problems like we'd never had before. Speaker 10: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw A doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, safe, and effective drug for the The application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 8: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ISU doctors, collectively, were some of the most Highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published Practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 10: As we sit here today, I'm the most published person in my field in history, But when COVID nineteen hit, my clinical and academic world was turned upside down. Speaker 8: That's when our lives started going sideways professionally. Paul started getting numerous complaints against him that he's never had in career? Speaker 11: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people die. Speaker 12: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products and related authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the U. S. Speaker 9: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then the logic supporting universal vaccination with Largely experimental products is no longer supportable. Speaker 8: The war on Ivermectin is waged by very powerful forces with a lot of money. I mean, Public health was built on a obsessive global vaccination policy, which Ivermectin would have threatened. Speaker 4: We've got Pfizer's Q3 earnings. Revenue, they're projecting to be 98 to $102,000,000,000. Speaker 13: Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna. You know how much profit they made from these shots? $1,000 every second from Wuhan virus vaccines. Speaker 8: You're talking about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in geopolitical implications that would be Significantly affected if the people had access to a safe and widely available medicine. Speaker 14: This is an incredibly cheap Drug. It's off license. It's generic. It can be manufactured in huge amounts in India. Remarkably low Cost. Speaker 12: Merck's patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996. In 2021, Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against COVID and bizarrely claimed, quote, a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. It was plenty safe for Merck to distribute widely when it was still under patent, but now they're claiming the safety record is insufficient. Speaker 9: Folks need to understand that just because There is an article out there that asserts that something is false. Recognize that those are paid. Speaker 15: Every major media outlet in the United States shares at least 1 board member with at least 1 drug company. Let me put it in perspective for you. These board members wake up, they go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, and then they have their driver take come over to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of programming that network is gonna air. They can't be honest and objective about big pharma Because big pharma pays their bills. Speaker 16: In fact, one analysis claimed 9 out of the top 10 drugmakers spent more on marketing than they did on Research. Speaker 3: CNN tonight brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. To you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Speaker 1: Brought to you Speaker 3: by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Royal Wedding is brought to you by brought to you by by Pfizer. Pfizer. Pfizer. Pfizer. Speaker 14: If asked the question, did you know how much influence your former employer had on big media and so on, I had no idea. It is clear that The pharmaceutical industry has has a great deal of sway on what goes on. If you can shape the message, then you can shape the world, and that's what they've done. Speaker 10: When was the last time you turned on the news and ever got an update about how the rest of the world is handling COVID? Speaker 14: A group of South African doctors has launched an urgent court application. They are seeking easier access to Ivermectin. Speaker 13: Globally, at least 5 countries want to use Ivermectin to treat COVID nineteen, including India and Argentina. There are numerous concrete tests in medical journals around the world that Ivermectin Does work. Speaker 10: The earliest reports we had, one of them we had in Peru, where they got into a good mode of using multidrug treatment with an Ivermectin based approach, that they were crushing Speaker 0: their curves. And the president of the Tokyo Medical Association announced to all doctors during a summer surge that they should use Ivermectin in the treatment. Within weeks, the hospitalization rates reported out of Japan were lower than at any other time in the pandemic. Speaker 10: The real proof positive came when COVID nineteen really hit hard in Mexico City. They finally, After lots of struggle came with an Ivermectin based multidrug approach and literally cleared out the hospitals. And then we had reports all the way through that various states in India. Speaker 17: In India, the government has been widely promoting the use of Ivermectin. State leaders have just declared that Uttar Pradesh is now officially COVID Free. A region with nearly as many people as the entire United States is totally COVID free. Speaker 8: The miracle success of Uttar Pradesh, not one mention of Ivermectin being used. Speaker 13: In the countries that it has been used, in the countries where the studies are, The results are not good. They are overwhelming. They are well over 90% success rate. Speaker 0: In the United States, it's a horse dewormer, it's horse paste, And only the illiterate, ignorant, and and or unvaccinated use it. Speaker 9: The key paradox is if you look at the mortality rate in the United States, one of the most highly funded medical care systems in the world. And what we find is the mortality in the United States is among the worst in the world. Speaker 0: If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there's only one way to understand them. They are literally Written by pharmaceutical companies. They can design trials to fail to disprove the use of cheap medicines and they can make things appear that they don't work. Speaker 9: I sit as a non voting member of the active Committee for Drugs with NIH. I've seen the dynamics of what going on with all those trials, which most of which have failed. Unfortunately, it's eminently possible to manipulate the outcomes of a clinical study. If you wanna study to fail, that's dead easy. Speaker 8: Now, their 4th quote unquote negative study of Ivermectin in a major medical journal. And each time is a media frenzy. Speaker 7: There was a systematic review looking at randomized controlled trials that had been done, And they found that there was no benefit for Ivermectin in reducing mortality, death to COVID nineteen, no reduction in symptoms or duration of symptoms for COVID nineteen, so it does not work. Speaker 14: People need to understand that academics have been threatened with losing their position and Threatened with getting no further research grants if they speak out against the narrative. Guess why that is? Two thirds of the world's noncommercial biological research is funded by just 3 bodies, The Wellcome Trust in the UK, the NIH, and specifically the NIAID under Tony Fauci, And the Phil and Melinda Gates Foundation. Speaker 9: There's this pattern that is consistent with a concerted effort To mislead the public by withholding information using modern technology, media, censorship, Really, let's call it what it is, thought control. Speaker 18: He could actually control, exactly what people think. And that is the that is our Speaker 14: job. Yeah. Speaker 6: Whenever you have clear cut evidence that a drug works, you have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people know so that they could have access. Speaker 1: What are you telling people is the is the optimal profile? Speaker 6: I want a pill, orally administered, Single pill given for 7 to 10 days, little drug drug interaction, and low toxicity. Give me that and I'll be really happy. Speaker 17: Ivermectin has been used safely for decades, has no known drug interactions, won a Nobel Prize for success treating humans and is on the WHO's list of the safest, most effective medicines in the Higher world. Speaker 9: And it showed an 86% effectiveness to prevent people from contracting COVID. Speaker 1: Ivermectin has been used over 4000000000 times and it's used for a wide variety of treatments. Speaker 17: Ivermectin has been shown to possess different anti inflammation, Antiviral and antitumor properties. Speaker 13: That is the thing about Ivermectin. It's not good. It's great. Speaker 5: Breaking news. The FDA lawyer announces that Ivermectin can be prescribed for COVID nineteen. Speaker 8: I have never seen an evidence base this large with 81 controlled trials. 10 years of in vitro studies in the lab against a dozen RNA viruses all showing that Ivermectin stops replication. It literally is, In my mind, the single greatest public health achievement in our history of infection control in the world.
CKellyUAP
Posted - December 16, 2023 at 5:57 AM
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 8:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author believes that there was a deliberate effort to discredit and destroy the effectiveness of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They argue that acknowledging their effectiveness would have jeopardized the lucrative vaccine industry and exposed politicians as frauds.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

IVERMECTIN : FOLLOW THE MONEY They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. They didn’t care how many people they killed. Because if they had acknowledged that Ivermectin or HCQ was effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed. And the politicians that wanted to claim glory for "saving everyone" with a free injection would have been exposed as frauds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, a group of doctors discuss the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Some doctors argue that Ivermectin is a safe and effective drug that has shown miraculous effectiveness in treating the virus. They cite studies and the endorsement of a senior immunologist to support their claims. However, other doctors disagree, stating that the studies are still undergoing peer review and that Ivermectin is not an approved treatment for COVID-19. They argue that the vaccines have emergency use authorization because there are no approved alternatives. The debate centers around the effectiveness and credibility of Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before. Speaker 1: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw a doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, safe, and effective drug for the application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 0: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ICU doctors, collectively, were some of the most highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 1: As we sit here today. I'm the most published person in my field in history. Speaker 2: To this because I mean, you're the only person saying this. We've got a listen to our doctors and our scientists. Speaker 3: So Ivermectin is a drug which has been dispensed 3,700,000,000 times. It's changed the face of parasitic diseases on this planet. It's probably the 2nd most important drug ever invented. It is very safe. It's very cheap, And it's highly effective against SARS CoV 2. Speaker 2: I don't even wanna get into this because, I mean, you're the only person saying this. We've gotta listen to our doctors And our scientists Speaker 4: I am a physician and a man of science. I have done nothing nothing but commit myself to scientific truth And the care of patients. Many that I wanna talk about. And I wanna talk about that we have a solution to this crisis. There is a drug that is proving to be of miraculous impact. And when I say miracle, I do not use that term lightly. And I don't wanna be sensationalized when I say that. That is a scientific recommendation based on mountains of data that has emerged in the last 3 months. Mountains of data have emerged from all from many centers and countries around the world showing the miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin. It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. Speaker 5: Well, firstly, what you said there is incorrect. Now if you only pick up today's papers, the Sydney Morning Herald, Australia's most senior immunologist, Emeritus professor Robert Clancy, Someone that was actually awarded an order of Australia for his services to immunology and medicine. He has said, and I quote, Craig Kelly is absolutely right. Now that's our most senior immunologist. So the idea that, I'm, I completely and utterly reject the idea That I'm out there putting any theories forward. I'm not putting any theories forward at all. Now, yes, some of the studies that I've posted are still undergoing peer review, But many of them have actually been through the peer review process. In fact, I would say the majority of the studies that I've posted have been through the peer reviewed process. And just because something I'm sorry. If that Speaker 2: is just not true, Craig. Speaker 0: I mean, one of the studies you've worked Speaker 2: it's a Bangladeshi plastic surgeon. I would like to take my medical advice from someone who is knowledgeable in infectious diseases is an epidemiologist. Speaker 5: Well, that's all. You should listen Speaker 2: to that. Speaker 0: In other cases, Speaker 5: you should listen to professor Robert Clancy. He's the most senior credentialed immunologist in this country. So that's who I believe we should be listening to. And he is he has said, like, I'll quote exactly What he's wrote Speaker 0: You've just you've already quoted it, Craig. No. Speaker 5: I haven't. I he also said it. I thought this is very important. He said, from uncertain beginnings, An impressive database has more recently been accumulated that strongly supports the use of hydroxychloroquine and or Ivermectin. Their use in concert with the vaccine, so this is not an anti vaxx position. You know, when the use in concert with the vaccines can no longer be denied. In fact, this is the only science based opinion. Now they're not my words. From Speaker 0: That's not my study. You're Speaker 2: referring to. Speaker 0: That's another study you're referring Speaker 2: to because Speaker 0: this is Speaker 5: important. Study. You are misrepresenting what I'm saying. What I'm what I'm No. No. No. But Speaker 2: I did my research, Craig, Speaker 0: as you asked us Speaker 2: to do. Speaker 4: You need to listen for a moment. Speaker 5: But hang on. Speaker 2: Look at that. Is a wonderful drug. You're right. If you have scabies or river blindness Speaker 5: You obviously haven't read. I'm sorry. You are not listening to our you've gotta listen to the science. You've gotta listen Speaker 6: to a doctor. Speaker 4: Are you a scientist? Speaker 2: Are you a scientist, Craig? I'm not. Speaker 5: I am not. I have just quoted the senior immunologist in this country, The most high as credentialed immunologist in this country. Now are you saying that he's wrong? Speaker 7: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people Speaker 4: die. Speaker 6: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products related authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, Preventing or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the US. Speaker 8: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then The logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products is no longer supportable.
VigilantFox
Posted - February 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM
Saved - February 8, 2024 at 1:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, known for its impact on human health, has been wrongly labeled as a dangerous horse dewormer to protect the COVID vaccine industry. The FDA's Emergency Use Authorization requires no alternative treatment to exist. Joe Rogan's recovery announcement was even altered to discredit ivermectin. Watch the conversation with Joe Rogan and Aaron Rodgers for more information. Check out related stories on VigilantNews, including Joe Rogan's outrage over politicians' insider trading and his belief in the truth about Anthony Fauci. Can Ivermectin treat cancer? Nine papers have been reviewed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Now, why would they do such a thing? Because ivermectin’s existence threatened a multi-hundred billion dollar vaccine enterprise. The COVID shots forced upon the world would not be able to exist if ivermectin was shown to be effective. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin, such as altering Joe Rogan's face to appear yellow, following his recovery announcement from early treatment. Watch and listen to this conversation with @JoeRogan and @AaronRodgers12.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people who have been criticized for their stance on vaccinations have faced significant consequences. They have lost friends, media allies, and sponsorship deals. The speaker and another person discuss how their own beliefs and health reasons for not getting vaccinated were met with backlash. They mention the vilification of early treatments, including a medicine with a safe profile that has been widely used around the world. They suggest that early treatments are not promoted because it would hinder the use of vaccines. They also mention individuals like Peter McCullough and Robert Malone, highlighting their credibility and ethical standards. Peter McCullough is noted as the most published doctor in his field of study.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of us who've been attacked for our position, to all those people, what do you think the fucking motivation is? Yeah. I mean, you know, just look at my own situation. Like, I lost friends, allies in the media, 1,000,000 of dollars in sponsorship because I talked about what worked for me and my own beliefs and my own health reasons why I didn't get vaccinated. Oh, by Speaker 1: the way, you were right. Yeah. You were right. Look. You didn't need it. Look how quickly you recovered. You were fine. Speaker 0: And same with you. Yeah. And what did they do? They changed the color of your face. They they vilified all early treatments, including a medicine that has one of the safest profiles out there. We talked about it. The guy who invented it got a Nobel Prize. They were using it all over the world in Uttar Pradesh, Africa and various places, Speaker 1: and that's what you do during the pandemic. Right? Speaker 0: You find ways to repurpose drugs Yeah. For early treatments. But, no, they couldn't do that. If there's an early treatment, then they can't get the UA. Speaker 1: Trump's been proven to have antiviral properties. Yeah. Speaker 0: But what's the motivation for Peter McCullough who got vilified? What's the motivation for Robert Malone? Like Speaker 1: Well, if you know Peter McCullough, Peter McCullough is like that guy has standards and morals and ethics. I mean, he is a rock solid rock solid. Treated patients too. He actually treated patients. He's also the most published doctor in history Yeah. In his particular field of study.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Full Episode: https://open.spotify.com/episode/69ZsvPAH8EBBDeIfrSDL8v?si=d170376bc2c44fe7

Page not found open.spotify.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Stories on @VigilantNews: Joe Rogan Explodes Over Politicians Insider Trading: “This Sh*t Is Insane!” https://vigilantnews.com/post/joe-rogan-explodes-over-politicians-insider-trading-this-sht-is-insane/

Joe Rogan Explodes Over Politicians Insider Trading: “This Sh*t Is Insane!” “This sh*t is insane!” Watch Joe Rogan rant for two minutes straight on politicians engaging in insider trading. “This Sh*t Is Insane!”Watch Joe Rogan rant for two minutes straight on politicians engaging in insider trading.“She [Nancy Pelosi] is great at it. She’s amazing at it. She’s a wizard at it. But it’s not just her.”“In… vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Joe Rogan Reveals How He Knows ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ Is Factually True https://vigilantnews.com/post/joe-rogan-reveals-how-he-knows-the-real-anthony-fauci-is-factually-true/

Joe Rogan Reveals How He Knows ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ Is Factually True Joe Rogan: ‘It’s F*cking Egregious’ They Won’t Give Bobby Kennedy Jr. Secret Service“It’s so wild. He’s the only presidential candidate ever that’s been denied Secret Service protection (three times).”Rogan added how he knows Bobby’s book is true:“If you read his book, if… pic.twitter.com/mSJa0jwWvO— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) February 7, 2024 "It's f*cking egregious," Joe… vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? 9 Papers Reviewed: https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com
VigilantFox
Posted - February 27, 2024 at 12:25 AM
Saved - February 27, 2024 at 7:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, recognized for its impact on human health and Nobel Prize-winning discovery, was wrongly labeled as a "horse dewormer" by propagandists. Despite its effectiveness, approved COVID medicines are expensive. Controlled trials show significant benefits of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, yet they are dismissed. @VigilantNews shares secrets and explores the potential of ivermectin in treating cancer.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But propagandists told you it was “horse dewormer.” Out of 43 effective medicines for COVID, the ones approved had something in common: They were all outrageously expensive, in the many hundreds, if not, thousands of dollars. Dr. @PierreKory testified: "As of today, there have been 420 controlled trials studying hydroxychloroquine in Covid. That includes over half a million patients with ivermectin. There have been 100 controlled trials with over 225,000 patients. "And summary analyses of these evidence bases all show large magnitude, statistically significant benefits in all important outcomes. "Yet in this country, ivermectin is considered an ineffective horse dewormer, and hydroxychloroquine, the drug of fringe quack, right-wing anti-vaxxers."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The forest plot shows COVID medicines, with only expensive ones approved in the US. Cheaper drugs were ignored. Studies manipulated endpoints and faced negative PR. Over 420 trials on hydroxychloroquine and 100 on Ivermectin show significant benefits, but they are dismissed in the US.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what's called the forest plot that shows 43 effective medicines in COVID. I've circled the only ones that were, approved for use in United States. And actually, the circles are off. But if you look, you probably can't see it. But if you look at the costs, the only things approved in the United States all cost in the many 100, if not 1,000 of dollars. Every zero, a $1, $2, $5 medicine was completely ignored and never would reach regulatory approval. Further, when they did not get the result they wanted, in several instances they were forced to change the original endpoint, a supposed never event in research science. And despite these manipulations, each of these studies' publications launch massive negative PR campaigns and recommendations from health agencies against the use of these inexpensive, safe, repurposed drugs. Last slide. If you look, this is just a little summary of the evidence base as we sit here today. As of today, there have been 420 controlled trials studying hydroxychloroquine in COVID. That includes over half a 1000000 patients. With Ivermectin, there have been 100 controlled trials with over 125,000 patients. And summary analyses of these evidence bases all show large magnitude statistically significant benefits in all important outcomes. Yet in this country, Ivermectin is considered an ineffective horse dewormer and hydroxychloroquine, the drug of fringe, quack, right wing anti vaxxers.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Stories on @VigilantNews: Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed/

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews 6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving/

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving This article originally appeared on drturner.substack.com and was republished with permission.Guest post by Michael Turner, M.D.Greetings Dear Friends,Inspired anew by my recent podcast with my friend Dr. Kory (who must be considered the world's expert on the use of Ivermectin in COVID), I wanted to share some summary insights with you about this truly astonishing vigilantnews.com
VigilantFox
Posted - March 8, 2024 at 8:57 PM
Saved - March 8, 2024 at 11:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new study published in the Journal of Infection found that individuals treated with ivermectin recovered from COVID-19 quicker and had a lower hospitalization or death rate compared to those who were not treated with it. This raises questions about why ivermectin was vilified and discredited, potentially causing unnecessary deaths. The article by @ZackStieber provides more information on the topic, including the untold story of ivermectin and its potential benefits in treating cancer.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made. And while they were doing so, the propagandists told you ivermectin was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it just so turns out that a new study published by the Journal of Infection has found that individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 and were treated with ivermectin recovered QUICKER than those who were not. Specifically, the median recovery time was two days faster for those who took ivermectin. The study also found that a smaller percentage of ivermectin recipients (1.6%) were hospitalized or died compared to 4% in the comparison group. That sure sounds a lot more effective than the so-called vaccines. So, why did authorities vilify ivermectin? Because the COVID shots forced upon the world would not be able to exist if ivermectin was shown to be effective. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin. And in doing so, critical care physician Dr. Pierre Kory says, “That has caused millions of people to die around the world.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

People Who Received Ivermectin Were Better Off, Study Finds Read the article by @ZackStieber below: https://vigilantnews.com/post/people-who-received-ivermectin-were-better-off-study-finds/

People Who Received Ivermectin Were Better Off, Study Finds Funding for the research came from the UK government. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ZackStieber Related Stories: Ivermectin: The Untold Story of a ‘Miracle Drug’ https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-untold-story-of-a-miracle-drug-4952578?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf

The Untold Story of a 'Miracle Drug' theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ZackStieber Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed/

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ZackStieber 6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving/

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving This article originally appeared on drturner.substack.com and was republished with permission.Guest post by Michael Turner, M.D.Greetings Dear Friends,Inspired anew by my recent podcast with my friend Dr. Kory (who must be considered the world's expert on the use of Ivermectin in COVID), I wanted to share some summary insights with you about this truly astonishing vigilantnews.com
myletrinh123
Posted - March 17, 2024 at 10:57 PM
Saved - March 18, 2024 at 2:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin should be given to all hospitalized patients, according to one post. Another suggests considering manslaughter charges against hospitals and doctors for not administering it, potentially leading to Covid deaths in Australia.

@myletrinh123 - Dr My Le Trinh -unlawful indefinite suspension8:32

“Every Single Hospitalized Patient Should Have Received Ivermectin.” For the majority of patient that did not receive ivermectin and died, should the hospital or the doctor caring for the patient be charged with manslaughter? Every covid death in Australia most likely did not receive ivermectin. They have grounds to sue the hospital and the doctor and many senior health officials for manslaughter.

@VigilantNews - Vigilant News

Dr. McCullough: Every Single Hospitalized Patient Should Have Received Ivermectin Why? 1.) “Safer than Tylenol” 2.) “It appeared to have a very prompt effect in helping people get through the illness.” 3.) “Papers ... showed that even in patients with low oxygen levels, they could promptly rebound at home and not be hospitalized.” Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. Yet hospital administrators fought tooth and nail to make sure patients didn’t get ivermectin. Why would they do such a thing? One reason is that hospitals were financially incentivized to use deadly interventions like ventilators and Remdesivir. Dr. Joseph Mercola calls this the “hospital death trap.” In multiple court cases, when families fought for their loved ones to be given ivermectin, “even very late in the illness, many were revived and survived,” testified @P_McCulloughMD.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin is a safe and effective drug for treating COVID-19, with studies showing it is safer than Tylenol and can help patients recover quickly, even those with low oxygen levels. A study in 2020 found a 50% reduction in hospitalizations when Ivermectin was used. Despite its proven benefits, hospital staff often resisted giving it to patients, leading to legal battles. However, when administered, even late in the illness, many patients improved and survived. The use of Ivermectin in hospitals is crucial for saving lives. Translation: Ivermectin es un medicamento seguro y efectivo para tratar el COVID-19, con estudios que muestran que es más seguro que el Tylenol y puede ayudar a los pacientes a recuperarse rápidamente, incluso aquellos con bajos niveles de oxígeno. Un estudio en 2020 encontró una reducción del 50% en hospitalizaciones cuando se usaba Ivermectin. A pesar de sus beneficios comprobados, el personal hospitalario a menudo se resistía a administrarlo a los pacientes, lo que llevaba a batallas legales. Sin embargo, cuando se administraba, incluso tarde en la enfermedad, muchos pacientes mejoraban y sobrevivían. El uso de Ivermectin en hospitales es crucial para salvar vidas.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivermectin, which is one of many drugs we used, to treat acute COVID nineteen. There were dozens and dozens of randomized trials, observational studies that showed, number 1, it's extraordinarily safe. It's safer than Tylenol through a large range of doses. And that, number 2, it appeared to have a very prompt effect in helping people get through the illness. And in 3 papers that were summarized by first author and colleagues showed that even in patients with low oxygen levels, they could promptly rebound at home and not be hospitalized. So in 2020, a prospective study was published in one of the best pulmonary journals, CHEST, by Doctor. Roeschter and colleagues. He testified at the US Senate on December 8, 2020. And with Ivermectin given in the hospital, which was easy to give, orally or down to an NG tube, there was a 50% reduction in Americans who took ivermectin in these Florida hospitals. So in the absence of any concerns on safety, every single American admitted to the hospital should have been administered Ivermectin because it gave a chance at survival, and there was nothing to suggest that it was unsafe. Yet hospital administrators and chief medical officers and those in the hospital fought tooth and nail to be sure patients didn't get ivermectin. And multiple court cases like the one Doctor. Bowden described went to court. And there were court orders to administer ivermectin. And this occurred in Buffalo, New York, in Chicago, and elsewhere. And when patients were given Ivermectin, even very late in the illness, many were revived and survived. So the Ivermectin story in the hospital is a very important one for people to understand.
VigilantFox
Posted - April 2, 2024 at 12:12 AM
Saved - April 2, 2024 at 6:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, once hailed as a miracle drug, was discredited as a dangerous horse dewormer to protect the Emergency Use Authorization for COVID vaccines. Its effectiveness would have undermined vaccine uptake and threatened the profits of the pharmaceutical industry. Ivermectin's low cost and potential to save lives from COVID made it a threat that had to be destroyed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Pierre Kory Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Before COVID, Ivermectin was celebrated as a “miracle drug” for its role in bringing river blindness to the brink of extinction. But the propagandists told you it was a dangerous “horse dewormer.” Why? 1.) Ivermectin threatened the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the so-called C19 vaccines. If Ivermectin had proven to be an effective treatment, then EUA for C19 injections could have been nullified. 2.) Undermined vaccine uptake. “If ivermectin would have found to be effective, what would be the uptake of those vaccines?” asked Dr. @PierreKory. “It would plummet.” 3.) Ivermectin would sabotage the profits from the C19 injections. “They knew it would destroy the market. And that market, probably over a few years, is north of $100 billion.” 4.) It threatened “the market for the competing pipeline patented pharmaceuticals like Paxlovid and Molnupiravir and Remdesivir, and they’ve made many billions off of those.” 5.) Too cheap to make money off of. Dr. Michael Turner says Ivermectin costs merely “$24 to save one life from COVID.” 6.) “This pandemic would have been over if everybody was on ivermectin, and that’s why they had to destroy it.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that Ivermectin's effectiveness threatened the emergency use authorization for vaccines, which would impact the global market worth over $100 billion. The speaker suggests that Ivermectin's low cost and availability posed a threat to patented pharmaceuticals like PAXLOVID and Molnupiravir. They argue that Ivermectin could have ended the pandemic if widely used, but was suppressed due to its potential impact on the market. Translation: The speaker suggests that Ivermectin's effectiveness posed a threat to the emergency use authorization for vaccines and the global market, potentially impacting billions in revenue. They argue that Ivermectin's affordability and availability could have ended the pandemic if widely used, but was suppressed due to its potential impact on the market.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So number 1 is that it would have threatened emergency use authorization for the vaccine. Because you can't have, you can't issue an EUA if there's a safe and effective treatment for disease. So you can't do any way for a vaccine. Now, I believe they could have broken that rule. They write the rules. They break the rules. I don't think that was the main thing. I think it's really that it threatened the global market for the vaccines. I mean, if Ivermectin were found to be effective, what would be the uptake of those vaccines? It would plummet. They knew it would destroy the market. And that market, probably over a few years, is north of $100,000,000,000 And then it threatens the market for the competing pipeline patented pharmaceuticals like PAXLOVID and Molnupiravir and remdesivir. And they've made many billions off of those. So here comes little, old Ivermectin off patent. It costs, I think, 6¢ in India to make a pill, and it's it's it's available everywhere. There's manufacture compounders of Ivermectin in every country in the world. I mean, it literally was one of the solutions to the pandemic. This pandemic would have been over if everybody was on Ivermectin. And And, that's why they had to destroy it.
VigilantFox
Posted - June 25, 2024 at 2:57 PM
Saved - June 25, 2024 at 4:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, recognized for its impact on human health and awarded the Nobel Prize, is now found to be effective against certain cancers. Dr. Paul Marik shares cases where cancer disappeared after using ivermectin alongside other drugs. Additional posts discuss strategies to prevent cancer, the truth about chemotherapy, and obtaining ivermectin.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is “very effective against certain cancers.” Dr. Paul Marik attests to this: “We know of cases of patients who had solid tumors who were given the horse dewormer (ivermectin), and together with some other drugs ... the cancer disappeared.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some antiparasitic drugs like mabendazole and ivermectin have shown effectiveness against certain cancers. Combining these drugs with others has led to the disappearance of solid tumors in some patients. It's not a single drug but a combination approach that yields results.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then we have the antiparasitic drugs. There's mabendazole, ivermectin that that have activity against, cancer cells. Mhmm. The This is I was gonna say the whore the horse dewormer. So believe it or not believe it or not, the horse dewormer is very effective against certain cancers. And so we know of of cases of patients who had solid tumors, who were given the horse dewormer, and together with some other drugs. So, you know, as I said, it's not one one magical drug. It's a combination it's a combination approach. But given a regimen which included the horse deworm and the cancer disappeared.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Full Interview: Dr. Paul Marik: Key Strategies You Aren’t Told That Help Prevent Cancer https://bit.ly/Cancer-Tips

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Stories: Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell https://vigilantnews.com/post/cancer-surgeon-drops-ivermectin-bombshell/

Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell Can ivermectin treat cancer? Watch Dr. Kathleen Ruddy explain what happened after she observed late-stage cancer patients taking this “miracle drug.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the Truth About Chemotherapy https://vigilantnews.com/post/dr-paul-marik-exposes-the-truth-about-chemotherapy/

Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the Truth About Chemotherapy You won‘t hear this from your typical oncologist. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/

How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

100 Reasons Why Ivermectin Works https://vigilantnews.com/post/100-reasons-why-ivermectin-works/

100 Reasons Why Ivermectin Works Send this to everyone who still doubts the undeniable truth. vigilantnews.com
newstart_2024
Posted - August 4, 2024 at 6:28 AM
Saved - August 4, 2024 at 2:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin continues to impress the scientific community as a versatile treatment for various ailments in humans. Despite being labeled as a "horse dewormer" during the pandemic, it has shown effectiveness in treating Covid and other conditions, posing a challenge to the pharmaceutical industry's mRNA vaccine profits. A recent study highlights its potential in treating numerous diseases, including cancer, malaria, and tuberculosis, and emphasizes its antitumor properties. The accumulating evidence suggests that ivermectin could play a significant role in cancer treatment.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Ivermectin is continuing to stun the scientific community as the “wonder drug” is being used to treat a growing list of various ailments in humans. During the pandemic, the corporate media and bureaucratic health officials attempted to smear ivermectin as a “horse dewormer” after it was found to be successful in treating Covid patients. Despite the reports of cheap and readily available ivermectin being successfully used to treat patients, it posed a threat to the pharmaceutical industry’s Covid mRNA shots and the profits from pushing the injections onto the public. This smear campaign led to ivermectin, a Nobel prize-winning drug considered to be the second most important medicinal discovery after penicillin, being labeled as “dangerous.” Ivermectin, a drug derived from a soil microbe, was found to be incredibly effective in treating Covid patients, however. Another study chronicled the history of the drug, its technical characteristics, as well as a long list of ailments it has been documented to treat. According to the study, ivermectin can be used to treat: cancer myiasis trichinosis malaria leishmaniasis American trypanosomiasis schistosomiasis bedbugs rosacea asthma epilepsy neurological diseases HIV tuberculosis Buruli ulcer The study explained that the drug can be used to treat a “variety of cancers,” noting: “There is a continuously accumulating body of evidence that ivermectin may have substantial value in the treatment of a variety of cancers. “The avermectins are known to possess pronounced antitumor activity, as well as the ability to potentiate the antitumor action of vincristine on Ehrlich carcinoma, melanoma B16 and P388 lymphoid leukemia, including the vincristine-resistant strain P388. “Over the past few years, there have been steadily increasing reports that ivermectin may have varying uses as an anti-cancer agent, as it has been shown to exhibit both anti-cancer and anti-cancer stem cell properties.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-drop-bombshell-ivermectin-cures-cancer-parkinsons-vax-damage-many-various-diseases/

Scientists Drop Bombshell: Ivermectin Cures Cancer, Parkinson's, Vax Damage, Many Various Diseases - Slay News Ivermectin is continuing to stun the scientific community as the "wonder drug" is being used to treat a growing list of various ailments in humans. slaynews.com
RealAlexJones
Posted - October 19, 2024 at 5:44 PM
Saved - October 20, 2024 at 3:15 PM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Ivermectin Can’t Be Stopped No wonder the government and Big Pharma wanted to demonize this wonder drug! https://t.co/YjRFEQZSTJ

GinaSaysSo
Posted - December 9, 2024 at 11:06 AM
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 1:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that over 200 members of Congress and their families were secretly treated with Ivermectin for Covid-19, which was proven to be safe and effective. It raises questions about why they remained silent during a global pandemic and why mainstream media labeled it as horse de-wormer. The CDC and FDA also downplayed its effectiveness, even mocking Americans. Meanwhile, the government allegedly paid pharmacies to remove Ivermectin from shelves, prioritizing profits from vaccines over public health. This situation feels like a betrayal, and it’s time to channel that anger into action.

@GinaSaysSo - Gina

Members of Congress and their familes were secretely treated with Ivermectin for Covid 19. It was PROVEN a safe and effective treatment. So why were these 200 members of Congress silent about their success with the Ivermectin treatment? Why the secret? Weren't we in the middle of a Global Pandemic? Why was MSM labeling it horse de-wormer? Meantime the corrupted CDC and FDA also kept Ivermectin a secret with the FDA even shaming Americans with warnings like this: 'You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.' And, as for the 81 million (my ass) installed puppet: ON BIDEN'S WATCH OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PAID PHARMACIES HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS TO STRIP THEIR SHELVES OF IVERMECTIN. Wanna know why? With a safe and effective existing treatment for Covid, there would be no Emergency Use Authorization granted for the 'vaccine.' Nevermind safe. Nevermind effective. We're talking about power and money and that's everything to big government. So Ivermectin vanished in an MSM-created cloud of shame. This 'horse-dewormer' could have saved millions of lives. Our government was more interested in the BILLIONS it could make in partnership with big pharma. Our lives didn't matter to the Biden Administration. Biden/Harris were installed to DESTROY us. Find your anger. Then find your resolve.

naticoineth
Posted - December 30, 2024 at 10:00 PM
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 6:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across Dr. Kathleen Ruddy's insights on ivermectin, highlighting its safety compared to a sugar pill. She noted that taking a large amount would be necessary to feel unwell. Dr. Ruddy has witnessed remarkable recoveries in late-stage cancer patients using ivermectin. Additionally, she pointed out that ivermectin is a Nobel Prize-winning discovery from 2015, second only to penicillin in its impact on human health, and has played a crucial role in nearly eliminating river blindness, with over 3.7 billion doses given worldwide.

@naticoineth - IlluminatiCoin

Cancer Surgeon: “Ivermectin Is SAFER Than a Sugar Pill” 👁️ “You’d have to take a lot to make yourself sick.” Dr. Kathleen Ruddy has also observed multiple late-stage cancer patients make dramatic recoveries after taking ivermectin. Ivermectin is also: • A Nobel Prize-winning discovery (2015) • Recognized, 2nd to penicillin, for having the greatest impact on human health • Credited for bringing river blindness to the brink of elimination • Used globally in HUMANS, with over 3.7 billion doses administered.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin is extremely safe, arguably safer than a sugar pill. In a randomized trial, those taking Ivermectin daily would likely experience fewer health issues than those on sugar pills. The narrative labeling Ivermectin as a toxic horse dewormer is misleading; over 3.7 billion doses have been administered to humans. It has significantly impacted global health by nearly eradicating several parasitic diseases. In fact, the risk of death from Tylenol is higher than from Ivermectin. While there are debates about its efficacy, in situations with limited options, using a safe and inexpensive drug like Ivermectin for sick patients seems reasonable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivermectin, as I said to you, is safer than a sugar pill, you'd have to take a lot to make yourself sick. Speaker 1: Well, let let let's stop for a moment. Yeah. Safer than tell me that again. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. This might be a bit of an exaggeration, but not by much. Ivermectin is so nontoxic that if you gave someone, you know, Ivermectin every day, if you did a randomized trial, these people are getting Ivermectin every day and these people are getting sugar pills every day. My prediction, test it, see what happens, would be that the people who are getting the sugar pills would end up having more harm, at least in, you know, spikes in their insulin level, than the people taking Ivermectin. So that's why I say kind of flippantly, you know, it's safer than a sugar pill. Speaker 1: We have a prevention protocol and then we have an early treatment protocol. Early treatment protocol, we use Ivermectin, which is not a horse dewormer. So that was a propaganda campaign, which was orchestrated by the FDA and is a complete and utter lie. It's not they claim it's a toxic horse dewormer. So let's be clear, 3,700,000,000 doses of Ivermectin have been given to human beings. And after penicillin, it has had the greatest influence on the health of the humanity on this planet by complete by almost eradicating a whole number of parasitic diseases. It is completely safe. I don't know how to stress it enough. It is completely safe. So you're more likely to die from Tylenol. You're more likely to die from Tylenol than you are from Ivermectin. So, you know, we could argue about its efficacy. We believe it's an effective drug, but, you know, if you have very few options, what is there to lose? If you have a sick patient, you have a drug that's completely safe, a a drug that is cheap, what in what in the heck have you got to lose by trying this drug?

@naticoineth - IlluminatiCoin

The red was where ivermectin and HCQ was banned. Can you imagine Nobel Prize winning drugs being removed at the height of a pandemic? 👁️ https://t.co/w96rgvmFom

newstart_2024
Posted - August 6, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 9:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the controversy surrounding Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug with a long safety record, which has shown potential against cancer and COVID. Despite its promise, Merck dismissed it for COVID treatment after its patent expired in 1996, opting instead to partner with Moderna on lucrative mRNA cancer vaccines. Critics, including Dr. William Makis, argue that Merck buried evidence of Ivermectin's effectiveness due to its low cost and off-patent status, prioritizing profits over patient care.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Big Pharma's Shame: Ivermectin Could Save Lives, but Merck Chose Profits Instead A Nobel Prize-winning drug. A decades-long safety record. A potential game-changer for cancer & COVID. So why was Ivermectin vilified? The Truth: Merck’s patent expired in 1996. Now, they’re partnered with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines—a BILLION-dollar venture. Conflict of Interest? Merck dismissed ivermectin for COVID… while quietly sitting on evidence it may FIGHT CANCER. High-dose ivermectin has shown remarkable promise against multiple cancers. But it’s cheap, off-patent—no profit for Big Pharma. "They buried the science for greed," says Dr. William Makis MD. "Patients deserve the truth—not a profit-driven medical monopoly."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning anti-parasitic drug, has been vilified. Merck, who held the patent until 1996, claims it doesn't work for COVID-19. However, Merck has a 50/50 partnership with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines. Because Merck will make billions on mRNA cancer vaccines, they have no interest in investigating ivermectin for cancer. There is evidence that high-dose ivermectin is effective in treating many types of cancers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivermectin has been vilified. It is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used as an anti parasitic for many many years. Merck had it on patent until 1996. And interestingly enough, Merck said it doesn't work for COVID-nineteen. Well, we find out now that Merck has a fiftyfifty partnership with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines. Merck is going to be making billions of dollars on cancer and mRNA cancer vaccines. So they have no interest in continuing to investigate ivermectin for cancer, for example, because it's cheap, it's off patent, they're not going to make any money on it. So there is tremendous amount of evidence that high dose ivermectin is extremely effective in treating many types of cancers.
craigbrockie
Posted - August 10, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Saved - August 11, 2025 at 1:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, often dismissed as "horse dewormer," is a Nobel Prize-winning drug developed for humans, effective in treating river blindness and more. Research is now exploring its potential in cancer treatment and as an antiviral. It operates by paralyzing parasites and blocking viral/cancer protein transport. Users report benefits like clearer skin and improved energy. Proper dosage and medical supervision are crucial for safety. Despite its low cost and effectiveness, it faced suppression during COVID due to financial interests. I believe it warrants unbiased research and recognition.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

They called it horse dewormer. But Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize. Now researchers are exploring it as a cancer treatment, a parasite detox, and even an antiviral. Here's why it works (and how to use it safely): 🧵

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

The mockery was relentless during COVID. "Horse paste" they sneered. But Ivermectin was developed FOR humans and won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine for virtually eliminating river blindness and other diseases. 4 billion human doses later, it's still saving lives.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Ivermectin works through two distinct mechanisms: In parasites: binds to key metabolic channels, causing paralysis and death. In viruses/cancer: blocks specific proteins that transport viral/cancer proteins into cell nuclei. Dual action = broad spectrum power.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

The anti-cancer research is stunning. While all this is early-stage research, oncologists like @MakisMD have noted ivermectin’s “15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action.”

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

As a parasite detox, Ivermectin clears worms, mites, and protozoa that mainstream medicine often misses. Chronic fatigue, unexplained skin issues, digestive problems? Hidden parasites could be the culprit. One dose can eliminate years of immune system burden.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

In addition to ridding parasites, it's crucial to heal your gut. Read the NY Times best-seller "Super Gut" for full details. It introduces the breakthrough of making your own high-strength probiotics at home. That's why I made this machine: https://amazon.com/dp/B0C5S6XVK7?maas=maas_adg_6BF236D9766CE5D11A11E4C3EC708800_afap_abs&ref_=aa_maas&tag=maas&field-keywords=wellness+gifts

Sorry! Something went wrong! amazon.com

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Ivermectin's antiviral effects surprised researchers. Lab studies show activity against West Nile virus, SARS-CoV-2, and other diseases. In one COVID study, a 5000-fold reduction in viral RNA within 48 hours. Early treatment may reduce viral load before symptoms worsen.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Real-world benefits people report: • Clearer skin (especially rosacea) • Better gut function after parasite clearing • Mental clarity & reduced brain fog • Improved energy levels • Immune system improvement The body heals when burdens are removed.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Dosage protocols for safety: • 0.2-0.4 mg per kg body weight (12-24mg for a 60kg adult). • Pharmaceutical-grade tablets. • Typical course: single dose or multiple days depending on indication. Medical supervision is essential.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Critical safety notes: • Avoid in pregnancy, severe liver disease, or children under 5 • Never use animal formulations • Always consult a doctor • Stick to proven dosing ranges Over 4 billion doses have been given safely when used correctly.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Why was it suppressed during COVID? Simple: Ivermectin is off-patent. At $1 per dose, no pharmaceutical company can profit from it. Meanwhile, new patented drugs like remdesivir cost $3,000+ per treatment. Follow the money.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

I took ivermectin myself during COVID and recovered quickly. Many doctors quietly prescribe it off-label because they've seen it work. But medical boards threatened licenses for those who spoke publicly about it. Science by intimidation, not evidence.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Ivermectin isn't a miracle cure-all. But it's far more than "horse dewormer." From eliminating parasites to emerging cancer protocols, it deserves unbiased research, not corporate censorship. The best treatments are often the simplest and cheapest.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

To get more empowering health information: •Follow me @craigbrockie •Get the first chapter of my “Ultimate Health” book FREE (click the image below) https://CraigBrockie.com/newsletter

FREE Newsletter - Secrets of Health and Happiness - Craig Brockie Want to take control of your health? Sign up now for my FREE newsletter to look and feel 10 years younger craigbrockie.com

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Thanks for reading! If you found this thread useful, give it a retweet so others can also benefit from it. And follow me @craigbrockie for science-based insights to improve your health and longevity.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

They called it horse dewormer. But Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize. Now researchers are exploring it as a cancer treatment, a parasite detox, and even an antiviral. Here's why it works (and how to use it safely): 🧵 https://t.co/1SBfFg4uX7

GuntherEagleman
Posted - April 4, 2026 at 12:06 PM
Saved - April 5, 2026 at 6:34 PM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

🚨 RFK Jr. dropped the hammer “They had to DESTROY ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine… because if they admitted those drugs actually worked, the entire $200 BILLION vaccine enterprise would have COLLAPSED!” Big Pharma chose profits over lives. https://t.co/9nfdisO2IO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were suppressed because they are well-established drugs with safety records and billions of doses used; ivermectin is a human drug that also works on horses and won the Nobel Prize for its effectiveness in humans. He states there is a federal law that says an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a vaccine cannot be granted if there is any approved medication shown effective against the target disease, so admitting effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin would have made EUA for vaccines illegal and would have collapsed a “200,000,000,000 enterprise.” Speaker 1 notes this is the first time hearing that assertion, acknowledging it’s in the book. He suggests that if the medical community had been saying ivermectin is an effective COVID treatment, EUA for vaccines could not have been granted. Speaker 0 explains that many in the medical community supported effectiveness, citing a petition signed by 17,000 doctors and numerous peer-reviewed publications, but Fauci aggressively crusaded against it, labeling it a horse medication and alleging danger and overdosing to drown out those reports. Speaker 1 asks why Fauci continued to push the claim after EUA was granted. Speaker 0 answers that, even with EUA, the law may require withdrawal if a functioning medication exists, implying a motive to undermine ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. He mentions a strong incentive for Fauci to kill these medications and cites several doctors who treated tens of thousands of COVID patients and supported the claim that the science shows many lives could have been saved. He names Harvey Reich at Yale, Peter McCulloch as the most published doctor in history and prominent in biostatistics/epidemiology, and Peter Quarry in connection with the doctors who treated many patients. They allegedly state that half a million Americans did not need to die.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll say, you know, explain to your listeners that there's a that people wonder why did we need to suppress ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. These are well established drugs with well established safety profiles that have billions of doses have been given. Ivermectin is a human drug. It it also works on horses, but it won the Nobel Prize because it works so well on human beings. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: Tony Fauci's problem is this. There's a little known federal law that says, you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine. If there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease. So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorizations to the vaccines, and they could never have gotten them approved. And it would have been, you know, a 200,000,000,000 enterprise that would have collapsed. Speaker 1: That is fascinating. I mean, I I have been covering this very closely now for all of the two years. That's the first I've heard that that, I mean, I in your book. So he would not have gotten emergency use authorization for the vaccine if it if the medical community had been saying, ivermectin works. It is an effective treatment for COVID. Speaker 0: Well, the medical community, a lot of it was saying that. I mean, there's 17,000 doctors who've signed a petition, and there are, you know, there are so many peer reviewed publications now that consistently say that, but he had to aggressively crusade against it to kind of drown out those reports by saying it's a horse medication. It's you know, people are taking it, and it's dangerous, and it's overdosing people. And, you know Well, why did he keep saying it? Speaker 1: Why did he why did he keep saying it after he got his authorization? Speaker 0: Well, one, even if you have the emergency use authorization, it's it the law appears to say you can't have it anymore if there's a functioning medication. Oh, you know, that may be why. Again, I try not to look in his head, but I do. There's a very, very strong incentive for him to kill ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. And, know, there are are many doctors, including Harvey Reich at Yale, is one of the leading biostatisticians, epidemiologists in the in the world. Peter McCulloch, who is the most published doctor in the history of the world and his specialty. Peter Quarry, these doctors who treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully, they consistently say, and the science supports this, that half a million Americans did not need to die.
VigilantFox
Posted - February 27, 2024 at 12:25 AM
Saved - February 27, 2024 at 12:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, recognized for its impact on human health and Nobel Prize-winning discovery, was wrongly labeled as a "horse dewormer" by propagandists. The approved COVID medicines are all expensive, while ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have shown significant benefits in numerous controlled trials with large patient populations. However, they are dismissed in the US as ineffective and associated with fringe groups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But propagandists told you it was “horse dewormer.” Out of 43 effective medicines for COVID, the ones approved had something in common: They were all outrageously expensive, in the many hundreds, if not, thousands of dollars. Dr. @PierreKory testified: "As of today, there have been 420 controlled trials studying hydroxychloroquine in Covid. That includes over half a million patients with ivermectin. There have been 100 controlled trials with over 225,000 patients. "And summary analyses of these evidence bases all show large magnitude, statistically significant benefits in all important outcomes. "Yet in this country, ivermectin is considered an ineffective horse dewormer, and hydroxychloroquine, the drug of fringe quack, right-wing anti-vaxxers."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The forest plot shows COVID medicines, with only expensive ones approved in the US. Cheaper options were ignored. Study endpoints were changed when results weren't as expected. Despite positive outcomes in trials, hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin face negative perceptions in the US. Over 420 trials on hydroxychloroquine and 100 on Ivermectin show significant benefits, but they are still viewed negatively.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what's called the forest plot that shows 43 effective medicines in COVID. I've circled the only ones that were, approved for use in United States. And actually, the circles are off. But if you look, you probably can't see it. But if you look at the costs, the only things approved in the United States all cost in the many 100, if not 1,000 of dollars. Every zero, a $1, $2, $5 medicine was completely ignored and never would reach regulatory approval. Further, when they did not get the result they wanted, in several instances they were forced to change the original endpoint, a supposed never event in research science. And despite these manipulations, each of these studies' publications launch massive negative PR campaigns and recommendations from health agencies against the use of these inexpensive, safe, repurposed drugs. Last slide. If you look, this is just a little summary of the evidence base as we sit here today. As of today, there have been 420 controlled trials studying hydroxychloroquine in COVID. That includes over half a 1000000 patients. With Ivermectin, there have been 100 controlled trials with over 125,000 patients. And summary analyses of these evidence bases all show large magnitude statistically significant benefits in all important outcomes. Yet in this country, Ivermectin is considered an ineffective horse dewormer and hydroxychloroquine, the drug of fringe, quack, right wing anti vaxxers.
View Full Interactive Feed