TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Posted - April 8, 2023 at 10:59 PM

Saved - April 8, 2023 at 11:31 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Attorney Tom Renz warns that mRNA vaccines could be surreptitiously inserted into the US food supply. Lobbyists for cattleman and pork associations confirm that they will use mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows. Missouri HB 1169 seeks to require labeling and disclosure of any product with gene therapy qualities, informed consent, and disclosure of adverse events. The bill is easy to pass and hard to oppose, but has become the most contentious bill in Missouri history. Transparency and disclosure are all that is being asked for.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Surreptitious Insertion of mRNA Could Be in the U.S. Food Supply RIGHT NOW "What's happened is, we found out that they're actually already doing this [inserting mRNA in food] in some countries. And because Congress decided to remove the country of origin labels from food products, if they're doing this in China, it's potentially in our food supply," stated Attorney @RenzTom. "We don't know where our food is coming from, but we know that they're able to do it and probably are doing it now in China. They're going to be doing it in the immediate future if they're not already doing it here in the United States. And that's just in meat; we don't know about in vegetables."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hospital 1169 requires disclosure of gene therapy qualities in products, discusses transmission of gene therapy aspects, and mandates informed consent. However, there is opposition to the bill, particularly from big pharma and agricultural lobbyists. Research reveals that vaccines may be integrated into foods, with a product called Seqevity already on the market. This technology could potentially transmit mRNA gene therapies from animals to humans. Concerns arise due to the removal of country of origin labels on food products, making it uncertain if this practice is already happening in the United States. Opposition to the bill comes from companies like Bayer Monsanto, who are incorporating gene therapy into seeds and livestock. The fight against informed consent is puzzling.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hospital 11 69 does 3 things. And I'm I'm getting your answer here, but it essentially requires that you disclose if any product has a gene therapy quality. It requires that you talk about how those gene therapy, aspects of the product could be transmitted to other people. And then it requires in full a full informed consent before someone gives you a medical intervention or a gene therapy. So 3 things that are completely non controversial and there's no problem. Well, we go and we're working on this bill and we're getting massive opposition to informed consent. We're saying, who the heck would oppose this? Well, it turns out that big pharma, through the ag lobbyists, were opposing this massively. And the reason that they're doing it is because, just I started doing this research. And going back to 2000, I've actually found documents going back to the mid nineties where they've talked about integrating vaccines into foods. Initially, this was done Speaker 1: Hey, Thomas. One one second. Just I just wanna clarify something. So you're saying that they're currently doing this, Or is this bill to just prevent it from happening in the future? Speaker 0: Well, that's the thing that was shocking to me is initially, I thought this was to prevent it. But we got word from the pork and cattle some lobbyists who I can't talk about names because these guys would get wire in a heartbeat that they were planning on using mRNA gene therapies, like in the immediate future. Speaker 1: Well, so I started doing some research and it turns out just there is a product called Seqevity Speaker 0: on the market from Merck that I'm I'm looking right here. It says, Seqevity harnesses IMR or RNA particle technology to create customized prescription vaccines, in swine. It's there. Not only is it there, but it appears that the technology is getting to the point where they can be transmissible from these animals to people. Just we have I also have and Peter McCullough confirmed this for me. He's looked at this. And he actually tweeted, and I'm just gonna read his tweet. He says, Chinese successfully reloaded cow's milk with mRNA, and it was absorbed into the GI tract of recipients. Concerns about surreptitious insertion of mRNA into the food are valid, must be stopped. Just what's happened is is we found out that they're actually already doing this in some countries. And because Congress decided to remove the country of origin labels from food products. If they're doing this in China, it's potentially in our food supply. We don't know where our food's coming from, but we know that they're able to do it and probably are doing it now in China. They're going to be doing it in the immediate future if they're not already doing it here in the United States. And, we that's just in meats. We don't know about in vegetables. Speaker 1: So we just got about a minute before we go to break. But if you could just walk through real quick who you said the largest just of opposition to this bill are, because maybe we can kinda reverse engineer out of that what the real issue is. Like I said, about 30 seconds. Speaker 0: Just Bayer Monsanto is located in Saint Louis and they're driving a lot of this. Bayer bought Monsanto, the largest seed producer on the planet, and they're engineering this into the seed, and, you know, maybe into the cattle and into other things. But big pharma is essentially using the lobbyists. Cattlemen associations fighting it hard. Farm bureaus, just a lot of the chambers of commerce says they're fighting this, because they don't want informed consent. I it's which is beyond me.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you don't want gene therapy surreptitiously inserted into your food, please share this information far and wide to spread awareness. To learn more about what you can do and Missouri HB 1169, please follow the link below: https://dailyclout.io/eat-your-vaccines-mrna-gene-therapy-is-coming-to-the-food-supply-this-month/

Eat Your Vaccines: mRNA Gene Therapy Is Coming to the Food Supply THIS MONTH They've given up on a needle in every arm. Now they're coming for what you eat. dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“Lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH,” warned attorney @RenzTom. mRNA food is coming — and it's coming fast.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“Gates, the WHO, a ton of these universities: they’re all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They’re going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines,” he warned in this video.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But Missouri HB 1169 seeks to counter such practices. It’s been described as “one of the most controversial bills in history,” but all it is – is a labeling bill. It doesn’t ban anything. You have every right to know if a food product is a gene therapy product.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, if this bill gets passed, it’s a major victory for informed consent and, in all likelihood, our well-being. The entire two-page bill is available to read on DailyClout (https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bill-texts/uNWj5bOW6b). Here’s an excerpt:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

"Any product that has been created to act as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could otherwise possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product, individuals exposed to the product, or individuals exposed to others who have used the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product" unless the product is known to be a gene therapy product. "Reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure the potential purchaser or user of the product is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product". The provisions of this section shall be liberally construed in favor of disclosure of any potential gene therapy product."

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The bill was written in a way “to be as easy to pass and as hard to oppose as possible,” conveyed attorney Renz. Missouri HB 1169 does three things:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1.) “It requires labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2.) “It requires that if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘hey, how does this spread? ‘Does it shed? ... Or is there a way that this can spread?’ And they have to disclose it.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3.) “It requires informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. … And it requires informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So, this isn’t difficult,” stressed attorney Renz. “I don’t think this is a Democrat bill or Republican bill. It’s sponsored by a Republican (Rep. Holly Jones) but should be universally supported.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

However, “[t]his has become the most contentious bill in Missouri history,” he lamented. “All we’re asking for is transparency and disclosure.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Now, pharma can’t come out and oppose transparency and disclosure. So they would need the agricultural community to have their back. Remember, Bill Gates and the CCP are the two largest holders of agriculture in America.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So these guys [Gates & CCP] throw money at these guys [agricultural associations] — buy off these guys. They’re not representing the local farmers,” attested attorney @RenzTom.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But here’s the reason this bill is so important. If attorney Tom Renz helps pass Missouri HB 1169, “those disclosures and the ability to get that information (is gene therapy in my food?) apply globally.” he explained.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So if we can win in one state, the truth in Missouri is the truth in Iowa. So we’ve got to get everybody on the planet calling these guys, telling them you got to pass this — you got to stand for we the people. All it is – is transparency and disclosure," he said.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

"We don’t even ban it. They can still make their poison foods. I just need to know if I’m eating them," @RenzTom expressed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, whether you’re in Missouri, Iowa, the United Kingdom, or Australia, you need to help push HB 1169 across the finish line. Because as @RenzTom said, if the bill passes in Iowa, “those disclosures and the ability to get that information apply globally.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, share this bill (https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products) on social media, call your local legislators — ask your representatives why a bill similar to HB 1169 is not being discussed in your neck of the woods. https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products)

HB-1169: Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products BillCam: HB 1169 Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products billcam.dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They’ve already given up on a needle in every arm. Make them do the same when it comes to inserting gene therapy into your food.

@RepThomasMassie — Thomas Massie

Posted - September 27, 2023 at 10:56 PM

Saved - September 28, 2023 at 5:25 PM

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

Scientists, funded with your tax dollars, are trying to turn edible plants like lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories. It's dangerous to play God with our food. The House just passed my amendment to prohibit USDA funding of this research.

Video Transcript AI Summary

A congressman from Kentucky introduces an amendment to prevent funds from being used for grants related to transgenic, edible vaccines. He argues that taxpayer money is being used to fund research at the University of California, Riverside, where scientists are studying the possibility of turning plants like lettuce and spinach into RNA vaccine factories. He expresses concerns about the potential risks and contamination of food supply, citing past incidents where corn vaccines for pigs contaminated soybeans and caused recalls. He emphasizes the need for a safe food supply and urges adoption of his amendment. The amendment is ultimately agreed to.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: For what purpose does a gentleman from Kentucky seek recognition? Speaker 1: Mister chairman, I have an amendment at the desk. Speaker 0: The clerk will designate the amendment. Speaker 2: Amendment number 86 printed in part f of house report number 118 dash 216 offered by mister Massey of Kentucky. Speaker 0: Pursuant to house resolution 723, gentleman from Kentucky, mister Massey, and a member opposed, each will control 5 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from Kentucky. Speaker 1: Mr. Chairman, I have it in support of my amendment which states that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to fund any grant Related to any transgenic, edible vaccine. Does the term transgenic, edible vaccine sound far fetched? Well, it's not. We're funding it. In fact, scientists from the University of California, Riverside Funded with your taxpayer dollars have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into RNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a transgenic, edible vaccine. 1 associate professor at UCR explained that Ideally, a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person. We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce And have long term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it. I don't think this is a good idea. I don't think the American people should be funding this. And I think and I would hope That we've learned something from the COVID experience with SARS CoV-two, that some of our science projects aren't the best ideas. With that, I reserve. Speaker 0: Gentleman from Kentucky is recognized. Speaker 1: My colleague on the other side of the aisle talks about keeping prices low. I think there's more to it than that for the American people. And he also speaks as if these vaccines, these transgenic, edible plant vaccines, Are only used for livestock. Well, in fact, they have been used for livestock. I'll get to that in a second. But they're also being used For people. That is the intended outcome of many of these programs that we are funding. Funding with money from the USDA. What could possibly go wrong with this research? Well, we found out a few years ago when a biotech company was experimenting, growing In corn, a vaccine to keep pigs from getting diarrhea. What happened? Well, the next year where the corn was grown, The prior year, the corn came up and it got co mingled with soybeans that were being grown there. It contaminated 500 bushels of soybeans, Which were then commingled with 500,000 bushels of soybeans. And those all had to be recalled and destroyed. Luckily, they caught it. Do we want humans eating vaccines that were grown in corn meant to stop pigs from getting diarrhea? I don't think we want that to happen. Yet that almost happened. And it could happen. There's another case where the pollen cross contaminated Another crop of corn and 155 acres of corn had to be burned. What are the what are the cases where we're not discovering this? I think it's dangerous to play God with our food. I think we need a safe food supply. And this is about food safety. Ultimately, the people in this country need to know what's in their food. And if we start contaminating the DNA of our food with DNA from other animals or viruses. The pollen can spread and we don't know what could happen. And I would hope we've learned a lesson from the Wuhan lab that sometimes things escape, sometimes things don't go as you plan. And so that's why I think it's a bad idea to fund transgenic edible plant vaccine research from the USDA. I urge adoption of my amendment and I yield back the balance of my time. Speaker 0: The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Kentucky. Those in favour say aye. Those opposed say no. No. In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. The amendment is agreed to.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - September 30, 2023 at 6:48 AM

Saved - September 30, 2023 at 9:49 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

New transgenic edible vaccines funded by taxpayers are raising concerns. Scientists aim to turn plants like lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories. However, there are risks of contamination and unknown consequences. We need a safe food supply, not vaccines grown in crops meant for animals. Lessons from the Wuhan lab should make us cautious. Funding such research is a bad idea.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

HORRIFYING Our Food Is About To Be Poisoned With NEW “Transgenic Edible Vaccines” They’re Being Funded Right Now BY TAXPAYERS, mRNA Food Vaccine FACTORIES “The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of my amendment, which states that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to fund any grant related to any transgenic edible vaccine. Does the term transgenic edible vaccine sound far-fetched? Well, it's not. We're funding it. In fact, scientists from the University of California, Riverside, funded with your taxpayer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a transgenic edible vaccine. One associate professor at UCR explained that, ideally a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person. We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it. I don't think this is a good idea. I don't think the American people should be funding this. And I think, and I would hope, that we've learned something from the COVID experience with SARS-CoV-2, that some of our science projects aren't the best ideas. And with that, I reserve. Gentlemen from Kentucky is recognized. My colleague on the other side of the aisle talks about keeping prices low. I think there's more to it than that for the American people. He also speaks as if these vaccines, these transgenic edible plant vaccines, are only used for livestock. Well, in fact, they have been used for livestock. I'll get to that in a second. But they're also being used for people. That is the intended outcome of many of these programs that we are funding, funding with money from the USDA. What could possibly go wrong with this research? Well, we found out a few years ago when a biotech company was experimenting growing in corn a vaccine to keep pigs from getting diarrhea. What happened? Well, the next year where the corn was grown, the prior year the corn came up, and it got co-mingled with soybeans that were being grown there. It contaminated 500 bushels of soybeans, which were then co-mingled with 500,000 bushels of soybeans. And those all had to be recalled and destroyed. Luckily, they caught it. Do we want humans eating vaccines that were grown in corn meant to stop pigs from getting diarrhea? I don't think we want that to happen. Yet that almost happened, and it could happen. There's another case where the pollen cross-contaminated another crop of corn, and 155 acres of corn had to be burned. What are the cases where we're not discovering this? I think it's dangerous to play God with our food. I think we need a safe food supply. And this is about food safety. Ultimately, the people in this country need to know what's in their food. And if we start contaminating the DNA of our food with DNA from other animals or viruses, the pollen could spread, and we don't know what could happen. And I would hope we've learned a lesson from the Wuhan lab that sometimes things escape sometimes things don't go as you plan and so that's why i think it's a bad idea to fund transgenic edible plant vaccine research from the u.s. day i urge adoption of my amendment and i yield back the balance of my time the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from kentucky those in favor say aye those opposed say no in the opinion of the chair the ayes have it the amendment is agreed to”

Video Transcript AI Summary

A congressman from Kentucky opposes funding for transgenic, edible vaccines. He argues that taxpayer money is being used to study the possibility of turning plants like lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories. He believes this is a bad idea and that the American people should not be funding it. He mentions a previous incident where corn contaminated soybeans, leading to a recall and destruction of crops. He expresses concerns about the safety of genetically modified food and the potential for unintended consequences. The congressman urges adoption of his amendment to stop funding this research. The amendment is ultimately agreed to.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Chair recognizes the gentleman from Kentucky. Speaker 1: Mister chair, I'm in support of my amendment which states that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to fund any grant related to any transgenic, edible vaccine. Does the term transgenic, edible vaccine sound far fetched? Fund. Well, it's not. We're funding it. In fact, scientists from the University of California, Riverside funded with your taxpayer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a transgenic, edible vaccine. One associate professor at UCR explained that ideally a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person. We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it. I don't think this is a good idea. I don't think the American people should be funding this. And I think and I would hope that we've learned something from the COVID experience with SARS CoV-two that some of our science projects fund aren't the best ideas. And with that I reserve. Speaker 0: Gentleman from Kentucky is recognized. Speaker 1: My colleague on the other side of the aisle talks about keeping prices low. I think there's more to it than that for the American people. And he also speaks as if these vaccines, these transgenic, edible plant vaccines are only used for livestock. Well in fact They have been used for livestock. I'll get to that in a second, but they're also being used for people. That is the intended outcome of many of these programs that we are funding, funding with money from the USDA. What could possibly go wrong with this research? Well, we found out a few years ago When a biotech company was experimenting, growing in corn a vaccine to keep pigs from getting diarrhea, what happened? Fund. Well, the next year, where the corn was grown, the prior year, the corn came up and it got commingled with soybeans that were being grown there. It contaminated 500 bushels of soybeans, which were then commingled with 500,000 bushels of soybeans. And those all had to be recalled and destroyed. Luckily, they caught it. Do we want humans eating vaccines that were grown in corn meant to stop pigs from getting diarrhea. I don't think we want that to happen. Yet that almost happened, and it could happen. There's another case where the pollen cross contaminated another crop of corn and 155 acres of corn had to be burned. What are the What are the cases where we're not discovering this? I think it's dangerous to play god with our food. I think we need a safe food supply. And this is about food safety. Ultimately, the people in this country need to know what's in their food. And if we start contaminating the DNA of our food with DNA from other animals or viruses, The pollen could spread and we don't know what could happen. And I would hope we've learned a lesson from the Wuhan lab that sometimes things escape, sometimes things don't go as you plan. And so that's why I think it's a bad idea to fund transgenic edible plant vaccine research from the USDA. I urge adoption of my amendment and I yield back the balance of my time. Speaker 0: The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Kentucky. Those in favour say aye. Those opposed say no. In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. The amendment is agreed to.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - October 15, 2023 at 1:54 AM

Saved - October 15, 2023 at 11:25 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Big Pharma is allegedly putting vaccines in our food without our knowledge or consent. They are exploiting loopholes in federal law. Intestinal vaccines can bypass the stomach and enter our system. We need to pass a bill to know what's in our food. We must wake up, contact our congressmen, and get involved in politics. This is a fight against tyranny. Parents should prioritize parenting and living off one income. Subscribe, like, and comment if you're aware of this issue.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

They Are Planning On Force Medicating You Through Your Food “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines.” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this. Guys, this is cause and diet suddenly and by the way we know now i've got a paper talking about using milk ingestible we've got ingestible one of the things that everybody said well you know it'll break down in the stomach it won't matter that's not true i've got the science i've got the papers i've got the documents they have developed mechanisms to get this through the digestive system we don't know what it works on entirely we don't know how we don't have all information but what i can say absolute certainty There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. So there you have it. I mean this is not conspiracy theory, y'all. We have to get up. We have to wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up. Ha ha ha. Alright, so you guys, make sure you share this video. Make sure you're contacting your congressman. If you live in another state and this is, make sure you send the bill that we have to your congressman and let them know, you guys, we have to get involved with these politics. We have to, we just have to, right? Because they're weaponizing the politics and we're just saying don't be involved in politics and don't talk about the politics. And that is really gonna put us in the trick bag. And I don't think you're gonna like where that ends up. in total, 100% tyranny, okay? And parents, please start parenting your children. Moms, please get back home with the kids. Everyone start trying to live off of one income, right? That's the only way we're gonna win, is if we take our families back, okay? Make sure if you guys are new around here, you hit that thumbs up, right? Make sure you subscribe to our channel if you're not subscribed, and leave a comment down below if you even had any idea about any of this stuff, right? Comment down below”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker expresses concern about the corruption of Big Pharma and their undisclosed additives in our food. They mention the importance of informed consent and reference the Nuremberg Code. The speaker claims that vaccines can be administered through the digestive system, although the details are unclear. They urge viewers to share the video, contact their congressmen, and get involved in politics to prevent tyranny. The speaker also encourages parents to take a more active role in parenting and suggests living off one income to regain control of their families. They conclude by asking viewers to like, subscribe, and comment if they were aware of these issues.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Up to the to the Big Big Egg Big Pharma conglomerate. House, this is one of the most corrupt things I have ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And, what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this. Guys, this is causing died suddenly. And, by the way, we know now I've got a paper talking about using milk. Ingestible. We've got ingestible. One of the things that that everybody He said, well, you know, it'll break down in the stomach. It won't matter. That's not true. I've got the science. I've got the papers. I've got the documents. They are they have developed mechanisms to get this through the digestive system. We don't know what it works on entirely. We don't know how. We don't have all the information. But what I can say, absolute certainty, there are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet, but what we do know is that this is a big deal. Speaker 1: So there you have it. I mean, this is not conspiracy theory, y'all. We have to get up. We have to wake up. Wake up. Wake up. Wake up. Alright. So you guys, make sure you share this video. Make sure you're contacting your Congressman, if you live in another state and this is you know, make sure you send the bill that we have to your congressman and let them know. You guys, you have to Get involved with these politics. We have to. We just have to. Right? Because they're weaponized in the politics, and we're just saying don't be involved in politics. You don't talk about the politics, and that is really gonna put us in the trick bag. And I don't think you're gonna like where that ends up. In total, 100% tyranny. K? And parents, please start parenting your children. Moms, please get back Home with the kids. Everyone starts trying to live off of 1 income. Right? That's the only way we're gonna win is if we take our families back. Okay? Make sure if you guys, you know, are new around here, you hit that thumbs up. Right? Make sure you subscribe to our channel if you're not subscribed, and leave a comment down below if you even had Any idea about any of this stuff? Right? Comment down below. We'll see you guys on the next video.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 15, 2023 at 6:09 PM

Saved - December 17, 2023 at 3:50 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A Virginia farmer from the National Black Farmers Association raises concerns about Bill Gates buying America's farmland, stating that it displaces family farms. The farmer urges Americans to support real meat and local farmers instead of fake meat and Gates' initiatives. The farmer also highlights the issue of Chinese ownership of American farmland and the government's lack of action. The interview provides valuable insights, but due to text limits, a full transcription is not possible.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Virginia Farmer From National Black Farmers Association On The Mainstream Media Blowing The Whistle On Bill Gates Buying All America’s Farmland Says Gates is “Running America's family farm off family land” “We can't buy the land once Bill Gates moves into the area.” Farmer Says American Politicians Aren’t Interested In Helping This Problem & They’re On Their Own “What he's trying to do now in the food industry is the same thing, uh, that they've done with, uh, seeds, you know, when they When they put genetically modified seeds in, and and now he wants to to do that with, uh, beef. But, you know, America's farmers are proud farmers. And I'm asking Americans not to support fake meat, but to support farmers out here who grow, uh, beef like I do and and poultry and and and pork. Support America's farmers and not support Bill Gates” “And and and by the way, it's not just Bill Gates. The Chinese, um, also gobbling up a lot of American farmland. You talked about pork.” “Um, the Chinese own, uh, the biggest pork processing plant. Brazil does too, but China, I think, owns owns multiple of them. Um, it's not good for our our economy, and it's not good for the small farmer. You know, I just I'm thinking about all of these these problems.” “They're trying to push synthetic meat on us. They're they're they're messing with the seeds as you talk about with these genetically modified seeds. And it doesn't appear that congress or government is doing enough to stop China from from buying the land, to stop Bill Gates from doing these things. So what should the people who are watching the show right now, how what should be their response? Should they be buying up land?” This is a great interview but I Can’t transcribe it all due to X’s text limits

Video Transcript AI Summary

Bill Gates and China are buying up American farmland, causing land prices to skyrocket and making it difficult for family farmers to afford. The National Black Farmers Association president, John Boyd Jr., believes that Gates' actions are driven by greed and are hurting American communities. He urges Americans to support local farmers and not buy into fake meat or genetically modified seeds. Boyd encourages people to start growing their own food and investing in rural America. He also criticizes the lack of oversight from the government and calls for support from political candidates. Boyd emphasizes the importance of natural, locally sourced food for both taste and health.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Along with China's land grabs, Microsoft founder Bill Gates is the largest private owner of American farmland. Gates alone holds over 275,000 acres across 19 states. Our next guest is a Virginia farmer who lives near one of Gates' data centers. National Black Farmers Association president John Boyd junior joins us now. John, so great to have you on. So So I'm sure you put a lot of thought into this. Why do you think Bill Gates is buying up all this land? Speaker 1: One one is greed, and, it's running America's family farm is off off family land. Basically, we can't buy the land, once Bill Gates moves into the area. For example, his, his his dad is on his right next door here. And since he's located in, Boynton, Virginia, Land prices have went through the roof, 15, $20,000 a acre. What farmer do you know that can pay that Kind of money per acre, you know, off off anything that we could grow on the farm. He doesn't do anything when he comes into these areas to support community based organizations Or invest back into these communities. That's what's that's what's hurting America right now. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And what he's trying to do now in the food industry It's the same thing, that they've done with, seeds, you know, when they when they put genetically modified seeds in, and and now he wants to to do that with, beef. But, you know, America's farmers are proud farmers. And I'm asking Americans not to support fake meat, but to support Farmers out here who grow, beef like I do and and poultry and and and pork support America's farmers and not support Bill Gates And this mega, mega, theory and and mindset that he has Yeah. It's really called greed. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. And and and by the way, it's not just Bill Gates. The Chinese, also gobbling up a lot of American farmland. You talked about pork. The Chinese own, the biggest pork processing plant. Brazil does too, but China, I think, owns owns multiple of them. It's not good for our our economy, and it's not good for the small farmer. You know, I just I'm thinking about all of these these problems. Right? They're trying to push synthetic meat on us. They're they're they're messing with the seeds as you talk about with these genetically modified seeds, and it doesn't appear that congress or government is doing enough to stop China from from buying the land, to stop Bill Gates from doing these things. So what should the people who are watching the show right now, how what should be their response? Should they be buying up land? Should they be learning to farm so that they can secure, you know, their own food supply for their own families. Speaker 1: Absolutely. And I just visited, 39 townships around the country Urging, small family farmers to start growing small plots of food in their backyard. Raise healthy foods that they know, that are safe to consume. And if, you know, if you grow it, and it tastes different from the Yes. The food that you buy in the supermarket. It's fresh. It's good. It's wholesome. Those are the things that we're gonna have to do. And if you can afford a new Mercedes Benz or a Cadillac or SUV, you can afford 5 acres in the country, people. So start investing in rural America. Start support supporting small family farmers around there. Guess what? They can start buying beef from a small a farmer. You know, I raise a 150 head of beef cattle here, and I can tell you right now, it's nothing fake about it. And I'm proud of the product, their leaves, both farm. And And all of, farmers right here in America feel the same way. And we see right now, we're getting bullied by, China and and people like Bill Gates who are coming in So Ira and and now you spoke about China. They come into these auctions and they have someone bidding for them. And they and, again, they are buying these farms at at auctions, Running the prices through the roof Yeah. With no oversight from this administration. No. And there's been no oversight or or I've I've requested meetings time and time again on your show, to meet with the president and and and talk about these very, very important issues, and now requests have fell upon deaf ears. So far, there hasn't been a meeting or anything like that, But we're looking differently to hear from other candidates who wanna reach out to us to see if they want our support. Speaker 0: I think this is one of the most important issues facing America. I'm really glad you're drawing attention to it. It's also a health issue. It doesn't just taste better, John. It's better for you to eat natural, and not all this synthetic stuff that Bill Gates and and wants to put down or even from these giant farm, giant processing plants. You're right. I I buy my pork. It might be from a local farmer near me. That's the way to do it. That's the safest, healthiest way. John, thank you for for for coming, for bringing attention to this, but also reminding people it just takes a few acres, and you can have your own food supply. Yes. Thanks so much. Speaker 1: Thank you. Support America's Farmers. Thank you very much for having me. Speaker 0: Amen to that.

@EvaVlaar — Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Posted - January 5, 2024 at 2:04 PM

Saved - January 5, 2024 at 8:14 PM

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Nobody who’s acting in good faith would come after the people who put food on our tables. The war on farming is part of a larger global agenda of control: the UN’s Agenda 2030. It’s simple: once you control the food, you control the people. https://t.co/X4PfSf0v4P

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 2019, the Netherlands faced a supposed nitrogen crisis, which led to government crackdowns on farmers and potential land expropriation. However, the speaker argues that this crisis is manufactured by bureaucrats in The Hague and Brussels. They claim that the attack on farming is part of a global agenda called the 2030 agenda, which is a United Nations initiative consisting of 17 sustainable development goals. While these goals may seem noble, the speaker believes that achieving them would require a forceful redistribution of goods, property, and rights, ultimately leading to the obliteration of basic liberties. The speaker suggests that the true motive behind this agenda is to establish a one world government, controlling every aspect of our lives. Farmers are specifically targeted because the agenda aims to radically change our way of life, including the food we eat.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So in 2019, the courts ruled that the Netherlands was actively in a nitrogen crisis. And that ruling has been the basis for our government to crack down on our farmers' rights and even move towards expropriation of their land. The nitrogen crisis does not exist. It's a pretext. It's a lie. The nitrogen crisis is a manufactured crisis created by bureaucrats in The Hague and in Brussels. Nobody Who's acting in good faith would crack down on one of the most lucrative, hardworking, historically important sectors of our nation. So then the only question that we're left with is why well, why would they do this then? The attack on farming is part of a bigger global agenda that is centered around control. Remember how I said earlier in this speech that, the farmers need to give up their their farms before 2030, Specifically that year? Yeah. So that's not a coincidence. That year doesn't come out of nowhere. So that year is basically the deadline that our global elites have given our country and will probably give you, to abide by these new regulations. And that agenda is called the 2030 agenda. The 2030 agenda is a United Nations agenda, so there we go. Everybody is part of the United Nations. Right? The entire world. And this agenda consists of 17 what they call sustainable development goals. And when you take a look at them right there, you're like, well, what's wrong with that? You know, they all seem very noble. No poverty, no hunger, who could be against that? However, if we take a closer look at how they actually want to accomplish all of this, anybody with 2 functioning brain cells realizes that this cannot happen unless There is an active and maybe even forceful redistribution of goods, foods, property, and our rights, which basically comes down to the obliteration of all of our basic liberties. And, of course, they tried to sell it to us under the guise of equality because, Well, you know, what is nicer than equality if we want everybody to have something. Right? Just like with communism in the old days, you know, It's never really truly about equality. It just means that the super rich get richer and that the rest of us become equally poor and miserable. And these goals, as I said, are not restricted solely to the Netherlands. They are global. And that's where we see their true motive. The people behind this want to establish a one world government, a new world order in which they decide what we eat, When we eat, where we travel, when we travel, who we meet, and what we are allowed to spend our money on. Basically Control over every single aspect of our lives. And I'm sure that many of you have heard the the famous Sentence from Klaus Schwab, you know, where he says, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy. Right? Yeah. That's this agenda. So why are the people behind this agenda specifically targeting farmers? Well, it's because obviously they really want Our way of life and the things that we eat radically change. They don't want us to eat foods that make us Strong. They want us to eat synthetic meat created by Bill Gates. They want us to eat bugs. They want us to drink soy milk so that we become weak and obedient, And we do as they say, and we buy what they offer.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 25, 2024 at 11:25 AM

Saved - March 25, 2024 at 12:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The mandatory electronic ear tag bill for cattle is causing concern among American farmers and Rep Thomas Massie. They believe it could lead to the banning of cattle and the end of independent producers. The bill would allow government and environmental groups to access information on small farms' cattle, increasing costs and potentially giving control to big corporations. The tracking of cattle is seen as a threat to private property rights and could lead to further regulations in the name of climate change. Lobbyists received $15 million to implement this tagging system, which is not authorized by any law.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

I’ve Been Blowing The Whistle On This For Months, The Electronic Ear Tag For Cattle Bill VERY IMPORTANT 🚨 Not only do American farmers say this could put ALL small family farms out of business but Rep Thomas Massie says this is the first step to BANNING cattle - “The key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country” - The mandatory electronic identification ear tag bill would allow government & environmental groups who attribute livestock to climate change to receive information on small farms cattle - Smaller operations will struggle to shoulder the cost and infrastructure to maintain these systems - Said by farmers I’ve shared “A Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. It’s meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business - The rule would increase marketing costs because whenever an animal is sold, it would have to be traced and recorded “Well, you know, the left wants to ban cattle. And before you can ban anything, you need a registry. You need to know where it's at and who owns it, and that's why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe. Now on the right, you've got some cronies who stand to make some money from these ear tags. They're the ones who get the $15,000,000, uh, earmark. It doesn't go to USDA. It's going to, quote, stakeholders. That is a code word for private entities are getting a handout. And, um, what they'll do, they'll verticalize the industry with this. The big corporations, you know, you just talked about China. There are 4 corporations control meat processing in United States. One's owned by China. One's owned Brazil by Brazil. American ranchers will be working for those organizations if this tracking goes through because they'll verticalize the industry. —What's your response to this tracking of cattle? Are you concerned as well? Oh, yes. I am. It is, the key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country, and it is a pro a private property rights issue that, uh, we really have to consider here. When we start talking about RFID, EID, and data monitor monitoring of farmers and ranchers and their cattle herd size, we open up to what the door to what is going on in the European Union. And, under the rules of sustainable development, we know that the RFID, has led to a land seizure in the name of climate change. So once we open that door, there's no going back. And, uh, they can come and they can monitor, measure, report, and verify everything that's going on your on your farm or ranch. And then it's maybe down the road in the name of climate change, they can come and, uh, uh, dictate to you the rules of their production, which are subjective on a from a third party verification, and it is extremely dangerous to private property rights. This is a liberty taker, not a liberty maker.” Congressman Thomas Massie posted on “Hidden in this week’s Omnibus: Lobbyists got $15 million dollars to implement ELECTRONIC TAGGING of all cattle in the US. No law authorizes this! It will be used by the GREEN agenda to limit beef production, and by the corporate meat oligopoly to DOMINATE small ranchers. Massie, who sponsored the PRIME Act (which would allow meat from custom exempt slaughter plants to be marketed in some instances) shared the language, apparently directly from the omnibus bill: “The agreement directs the Department to continue to provide the tags and related infrastructure needed to comply with the Federal Animal Disease Traceability rule (9 CFR 86), including no less than $15,000,000 for electronic identification (EID) tags and related infrastructure needed for stakeholders to comply with the proposed rule. “Use of Electronic identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison.” (88 FR 3320), should that rule be finalized.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The left wants to tag cattle for a potential ban, while the right sees it as a money-making opportunity. Concerns about private entities benefiting and industry verticalization arise. The tracking of cattle is viewed as a threat to independent producers and private property rights, drawing parallels to European practices and potential land seizures under the guise of climate change. This monitoring could lead to third-party control over production, posing a danger to liberty.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, you know, the left wants to ban cattle. And before you can ban anything, you need a registry. You need to know where it's at and who owns it, and that's why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe. Now on the right, you've got some cronies who stand to make some money from these ear tags. They're the ones who get the $15,000,000, earmark. It doesn't go to USDA. It's going to quote stakeholders. That is a code word for private entities are getting a handout. And, what they'll do, they'll verticalize the industry with this. The big corporations, you know, you just talked about China. There are 4 corporations control meat processing in United States. One's owned by China, one's owned Brazil by Brazil. American ranchers will be working for those organizations if this tracking goes through because they'll verticalize the industry. Shadi, what's your response to this tracking of cattle? Are you concerned as well? Speaker 1: Oh, yes. I am. It is, the key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country. And it is a private property rights issue that, we really have to consider here. When we start talking about RFID, EID and data monitoring of farmers and ranchers and their cattle herd size, we open up to what the door to what is going on in the European Union. And under the rules of sustainable sustainable development, we know that the RFID, has led to a land seizure in the name of climate change. So once we open that door, there's no going back. And, they can come and they can monitor, climate change, they can come and, dictate to you the climate change, they can come and, dictate to you the rules of their production, which is subjective on a from a third party verification, and it is extremely dangerous to private property rights. This is a liberty taker, not a liberty maker.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 27, 2024 at 11:01 AM

Saved - March 27, 2024 at 12:57 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Oregon is cracking down on small family farms, treating them like large commercial operations. Satellite imagery is being used to target farms, and neighbors can report violations through a hotline. Cease and desist letters are being sent, and farms can no longer operate without a water right. The state only allows rainwater to be used without a permit, even private wells belong to the state. Other states may adopt similar laws if Oregon succeeds. Gardeners with half-acre gardens are also receiving cease and desist orders for watering without a water right.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

More Details On Oregon Shutting Down Family Farms & Going After Small Farmers Selling Food To Their Neighbors - Government using satellite imagery to pinpoint farms to target - Government hotline for neighbors to report “Oregon lawmakers are rewording their laws to effectively treat small local farms the same as like a large farming operation on a commercial scale” Small farms being sent cease and desist letter and can no longer operate without a water right: “Permitting processes to use your own well water” “Guys. I had to stop what I was doing to share this with you guys because this is crazy. Right now, the state of Oregon is shutting down small family farms in mass under the guise of water conservation. Oregon lawmakers are rewording their laws to effectively treat small local farms the same as like a large farming operation on a commercial scale. And let me tell you the scariest part because I've talked about this on my page before. The way they are finding these farms is they are using satellite imagery to pinpoint your farm and send you a cease and desist letter, and insisting that you stop all production. Their government has also set up a hotline, so that your neighbors can call and rat on you for watering the vegetables and fruit, that you're gonna go sell at the farmer's market next weekend. Now I can make a follow-up video, going over detail about these laws that they are abusing as well as the law suits that farmers are filing to fight back. — This might be Oregon right now, but I promise you if they get away with this, other states will adopt these same law. Stay informed, friends. Know who you're voting into office and know whose best interest they have at heart.” — More Details From A Previous Post I’ve Made About What’s Going On: Previously I posted a video about “Women operating farm for 7 years gets notice she can no longer operate without a water right: “Permitting processes to use your own well water” Oregon also sending out cease & desist orders on watering your own gardens “Gardeners with a half acre of land are now receiving cease and desist orders saying you can't water your gardens” (without a water right) “In the state of Oregon, if you are using water, even groundwater, the only water that you can legally harvest and use without a permit is actually rainwater. — Even if you have a private well on your property, that belongs to the people of Oregon, not you. So, um, what they've said is basically if you're using it for commercial purposes, you have to have a permit. “So under this this rule, there's an exemption for commercial and industrial use for up to 5,000 gallons per day. Okay. So these gardeners with a half acre of land are probably using a 1000 gallons of water a day, not even a 1000 gallons of water a day. You would think that they're saying you're a commercial business because if you are growing food for yourself, they still allow you to utilize, you know water from your well to grow a half acre garden up to a half acre garden.” From Oregon Government website: Groundwater uses exempt from needing a water right include: • Stock watering • Lawn or noncommercial garden watering of not more than one-half acre in area • Single or group domestic purposes not exceeding 15,000 gallons per day • Single industrial or commercial purposes not exceeding 5,000 gallons per day • Down-hole heat exchange uses • Watering school grounds that are ten acres or less and located within a critical groundwater area • Emergency firefighting

Video Transcript AI Summary

Oregon is shutting down small family farms under the guise of water conservation, treating them like large commercial operations. They use satellite imagery to find farms and send cease and desist letters. Neighbors can report on watering practices. Lawsuits are being filed by farmers. Watch Yanasa TV's video for more details. Other states may follow suit if this continues. Stay informed and vote wisely.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Guys. I had to stop what I was doing to share this with you guys because this is crazy. Right now, the state of Oregon is shutting down small family farms in mass under the guise of water conservation. Oregon lawmakers are rewording their laws to effectively treat small local farms the same as like a large farming operation on a commercial scale. And let me tell you the scariest part because I've talked about this on my page before. The way they are finding these farms is they are using satellite imagery to pinpoint your farm and send you a cease and desist letter and insisting that you stop all production. Their government has also set up a hotline so that your neighbors can call and rat on you for watering the vegetables and fruit, that you're gonna go sell at the farmers market next weekend. Now I can make a follow-up video, going over detail about these laws that they are abusing as well as the lawsuits that farmers are filing to fight back. But in the meantime, I want you to watch this video. Go to Yanasa TV on the y tube, his episode from 7 days ago. I'll put it down in the description below. He did a fantastic job of doing a deep dive into this issue. This might be Oregon right now, but I promise you if they get away with this, other states will adopt the same law. Stay informed, friends. Know who you're voting into office and know whose best interest they have at heart.

@WallStreetSilv — Wall Street Silver

Posted - March 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM

Saved - March 28, 2024 at 11:53 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In Oregon, the new CAFO bill is causing concern as it targets local producers, farmers, and small businesses. Non-compliant farms face closure, which could cost farmers a significant amount of money. Many view this as an attack on small businesses and local producers, urging for resistance.

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

"In the state of Oregon they are going after shutting down local producers, farmers, and small businesses due to the new definition of this CAFO bill" "Now if they come to your farm and you are not up to their code, they will SHUT YOU DOWN" "It's going to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix everything and farmers don't make a lot of money" "This is an ATTACK on small businesses and local producers" "This is something we need to stand and fight back against" 🚨🚨🚨

Video Transcript AI Summary

Oregon is shutting down local farmers and small businesses under a new CAFO bill, requiring costly upgrades to meet new regulations. This will hurt small businesses and benefit big corporations. We need to fight back against this attack on local producers. Stand together and share this message to spread awareness.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In the state of Oregon, they're going after and shutting down local producers, farmers, and small businesses due to the new definition of this CAFO bill. Now a CAFO is a confined animal feeding operation that covers everybody that raises livestock. They're making them dig new trenches, new water treatment plants, and concreting all their corrals the animals are being fed on. Now if they come to your farm or where you're producing your your livestock and you're not up to their code, they will shut you down until you get it fixed. The thing about this is is it's gonna cost 100 of 1,000 of dollars to fix everything, and farmers don't make a lot of money. We're not rich, and they know this. So it's an attack on small businesses and local producers to make everything go upstream and upscale back to the big businesses and the big packers. This is something we need to stand up and fight back against. So if you're in the state of Oregon, I am with you. Everybody that's with me, make sure you share this around, get the information out there.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - April 3, 2024 at 4:37 AM

Saved - April 3, 2024 at 4:56 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

An American rancher strongly opposes the government's control over cattle. He believes that firearms and livestock are essential for sovereignty and autonomy. The rancher warns that the government's electronic ID legislation aims to tax cattle and take away people's sovereignty. He criticizes the government for using health and safety as an excuse to strip away freedom. The rancher addresses those in Washington and the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, expressing his discontent.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Rancher Has A Message For US Government “Keep your goddamn hands off my cattle” IMPORTANT 🚨 “My family's been ranching in Texas since the 1880’s and I have a university degree in political science and government, so I feel uniquely qualified to comment on this. That is the overarching thesis of the electronic ID legislation from my perspective as a Texan, as an American and here is why: Firearms and livestock are the 2 primary insuring agents of sovereignty and autonomy. If you want to control a population, take away their ability to defend themselves and feed themselves without some sort of government middleman. Tale as old as time. But this is particularly insidious, and this is why: It's not just about taxing your assets. It's not just about being unable to leave cattle to your children without them having to register it to the government. This is about you paying a methane tax on every single cow that you own. That's where this is going. This is about taking away every last bit of sovereignty you have. Just like everything else, they'll say, this is about health and safety. And then they come in and they take away any freedom that you possibly have. So in summation, all of you goons in Washington and at the NCBA (National Cattlemen's Beef Association) ***”

Video Transcript AI Summary

As a Texan rancher with a political science degree, I believe the electronic ID legislation threatens our autonomy. Firearms and livestock ensure sovereignty. The government aims to tax cattle and control our assets. This legislation undermines our freedom under the guise of health and safety. Washington and the NCBA are stripping away our sovereignty.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Keep your goddamn hands off my cattle. That is the overarching thesis of the electronic ID legislation from my perspective as a Texan, as an American. And here is why. My family's been ranching in Texas since the 1880s, and I have a university degree in political science and government, So I feel uniquely qualified to comment on this. Firearms and livestock are the 2 primary insuring agents of sovereignty and autonomy. If you want to control a population, take away their ability to defend themselves and that feed themselves without some sort of government middleman. Tale as old as time. But this is particularly insidious, and this is why. It's not just about taxing your assets. It's not just about being unable to leave cattle to your children without them having to register it to the government. This is about you paying a methane tax on every single cow that you own. That's where this is going. This is about taking away every last bit of sovereignty you have. Just like everything else, they'll say this is about health and safety and then they come in and they take away any freedom that you possibly have. So in summation, all of you goons in Washington and at the NCBA

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - April 30, 2024 at 1:53 AM

Saved - April 30, 2024 at 10:18 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The USDA has mandated EID Tags on all cattle within six months for disease traceability. This decision has sparked controversy and concerns among cattle ranchers, who believe it is a control measure. The implementation timeline suggests that the USDA may have already prepared for this mandate. Some ranchers without proper facilities are particularly affected by this requirement.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

An Amazing “Coincidence” American Cattle Rancher warned the USDA would use this Bird Flu outbreak to start the EID Tags on cattle mandate The USDA just mandated EID Tags on cattle & bison for the reason of “Disease Traceability” Another disease that was ALL ABOUT CONTROL “My cattle friends watched the feeder flash this morning. I warned a bunch of my friends when this bird flu bullshit come out and it is bullshit that EIDs were coming. The USDA come down on Friday is they have said that within six months, all sexually intact cattle, I mean all cattle, all beef cattle, every kind of cattle are going to have to be mandatory ID, EID tagged. It has to be a visible tag and electronically visible tag. And it's gonna be on all cattle, basically all breeding cattle. So our calves and yearlings are. Now, the only way that the USDA could implement this in six months is if they've already had a stockpile of tags they knew what they were doing they've accomplished what they were doing. This is bullsh*t and it really sucks for this, you know the guys that don't have facilities and just want a few head of cows in their in their backyard so we'll see what comes out of this but I guess you boys better we better get our taggers ready because we knew it was coming”

Video Transcript AI Summary

My cattle friends, did you see the news about mandatory EID tagging for all cattle within 6 months? The USDA announced that all beef cattle will need visible and electronic tags, affecting breeding cattle. This seems rushed and unfair, especially for small-scale farmers. We'll have to wait and see how this unfolds, but it looks like we need to prepare for tagging soon.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Have my cattle friends watched the feeder flash this morning? Now I warned a bunch of my friends when this bird flu bullshit come out and and it is bullshit that EIDs were coming. Speaker 1: The USDA come down on Friday is they have said that within 6 months, all sexually intact cattle, I mean, all cattle, all beef cattle, every kind of cattle, are are going to have to be, mandatory ID, EID tagged. It has to be a visible tag and electronically visible tag, and it's gonna be on all cattle, basically all breeding cattle. So our calves and yearlings are okay. Speaker 0: Now the only way that the USDA could fucking pigeons. Could implement this in 6 months is if they've already had a stockpile of tags. They knew what they were doing. They've accomplished what they were doing. This is bullshit. And, it really sucks for the this, you know the guys that don't have facilities and just want a few head of cows in their in their backyard. So we'll see what comes out of this but I guess you boys better we better get our taggers ready because we I knew it was coming.

@BrightInsight6 — Jimmy Corsetti

Posted - May 2, 2024 at 4:21 PM

Saved - May 2, 2024 at 6:05 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Farmers are facing a situation similar to the collapse of the Roman Empire. History shows that when farmland is concentrated in the hands of a few wealthy landlords, small farmers struggle with high taxes and depleted land. This leads to increased food prices and small farmers becoming bound by law to the land they work. The USDA's restrictions on over-the-counter antibiotics and dewormers will raise costs for farmers and result in higher prices for meat. The decline of small farmers was a significant factor in the fall of the Roman Empire.

@BrightInsight6 - Jimmy Corsetti

What’s happening to Farmers right now is shockingly similar to the Collapse of the ROMAN EMPIRE 🚨 DID YOU KNOW, leading to the Collapse, the following happened:👇🏻 1) Farmland passed over to just SIX rich Landlords‼️ 2) Unable to compete with the burden of TAXES, small Farmers gave up‼️ 3) Neglect of Fertilization exhausted their Land, and would no longer grow crops‼️ 3) FOOD PRICES THEN RAPIDLY INCREASED‼️ 4) Small Farmers who resisted ultimately entered arrangements made by the wealthy owners, and were forever bound by LAW to the Farmland they worked‼️ “Those who do not learn History are doomed to repeat it.” ‘The Conquest of Civilization’ by James Henry Breasted, 1926

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Farmers Are Under Attack In America 🚨 American Farmer says the USDA is “Taking away our abilities as farmers, ranchers, homesteaders to take care of our livestock” “They are taking away all over the counter antibiotics and dewormer. Whether it be oral splash on the pills, they are taking those away from us and move making us bring in veterinary care in order to monitor and administer those. That is going to make our overhead as homesteaders, farmers, ranchers extremely high. Because, again, a lot of this stuff we do on our own, You know, we do the splash on. But, again, they're taking those away. The ivermectin, the other anti parasitics, they are taking those away from us as farmer ranchers because I don't know. — If you're a farmer, rancher, whatever, stock up. Stock up now while you can while it's out. But it's coming” “We're all about to pay a lot higher price for beef, chicken, pork, meat”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The government is restricting access to over-the-counter antibiotics and dewormers for farmers, increasing costs. This will require more veterinary care, raising expenses for farmers, ranchers, and homesteaders. The speaker advises stocking up on supplies before the changes take effect. They also mention concerns about potential bans on apps like TikTok being sneaked into other bills.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Good afternoon, y'all. So we're all about to pay a lot higher price for beef, chicken, pork, meat, period. And let me tell you why. There's a 4 letter government entity. I'm not gonna bad mouth them in any way, shape, or form because they probably watched my page. But anyways, they are they have come down with a rule, and they are taking away our abilities as farmers, ranchers, homesteaders to take care of our livestock. What they have done last year was they took away LA 200. Well, this year, they are taking away all over the counter antibiotics and dewormer. Whether it be oral splash on the pills, they are taking those away from us and move making us bring in veterinary care in order to monitor and administer those. That is going to make our overhead as homesteaders, farmers, ranchers extremely high. Because again, a lot of this stuff we do on our own, you know, we do the splash on, but again, they're taking those away. The ivermectin, the the the other anti parasitics, they're taking those away from us as farmer ranchers because I don't know. Just like this whole TikTok ban thing that they're trying to sneak in, you know, in with another bill that's probably gonna get passed, and we're probably gonna end up losing this app right here. So you might wanna save this video because it's it's it's coming. But yeah. If you're a farmer, rancher, whatever, stock up. Stock up now while you can while it's out. But it's coming. So, hope you all have a great day.

@BrightInsight6 - Jimmy Corsetti

QUOTE: “The destruction of small Farmers and the inability of Rome to restore them formed the leading cause among a whole group of causes which brought about the decline and fall of this great empire.” 😱👇🏻 https://t.co/k81PoGtBUP

@robbystarbuck — Robby Starbuck

Posted - May 8, 2024 at 2:38 AM

Saved - May 8, 2024 at 2:59 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The USDA under Biden has mandated electronic ID tags for dairy cows and sexually intact cattle and bison over 18 months for interstate travel. Some individuals are opposed to this regulation, expressing their reluctance to comply with the government's requirement.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Biden’s USDA has issued a regulation that forces dairy cows of any age and all "sexually intact" cattle and bison over 18 months to be tagged with electronic ID’s for interstate travel. I’m not putting chips in my cows for the Feds. Last time I checked this was still America. @USDA can come try to force chip our cows and watch how popular that is. 😉

Video Transcript AI Summary

I implemented mandatory EIDs for beef cattle, bison, and dairy breeds. USDA and APHIS require approved EID tags for animals over 18 months, used for exhibitions, or born after March 11, 2013. This rule applies 180 days after Federal Register publication under bill code 3410-34-p. Let me know if you want more details.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, I did it. Whether you were in favor or oppose a mandatory EIDs, it is now going to be a thing. Brought to you probably by the USDA and APHIS, which stands for Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services. You have to have an electronic ID. 840 tag, EID. It's a button tag, tomato tomato. Now the brand and the color and the size have to be approved by the USDA. Super fun. So let's talk about what animals are actually being affected by this. This only affects beef cattle and bison breeds that are 18 months or older, sexually intact, or any beef cattle breed or bison that is used for rodeo exhibitions, recreational, or livestock shows. All of those, despite the age, despite the gender, also have to have an EID tag. Now the dairy breeds are a little different. Dairy, sorry, man. You got the shack. You have to put an EID into any dairy breed female, and you have to put a EID into any male of dairy breeds that were born after March 11th 2013. It's a requirement. Now this will go into effect a 180 days after the Federal Register will publish the documents. And if you want to know the bill code, the bill code is 3410 dash 34 dash p. And we do a multiseries on this because there's a lot of information, but let me know in the comments.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - June 25, 2024 at 12:14 PM

Saved - June 25, 2024 at 2:11 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A ballot initiative in Sonoma County, California aims to ban family farms and factory farms, threatening the local livestock farming industry. If passed, it would phase out medium- and large-sized concentrated agricultural feeding operations, impacting hundreds of farms. Sponsors of the ordinance seek to eliminate animal agriculture altogether. This is seen as an attack on food sovereignty and American ranchers. It is important to take action to prevent this initiative from passing.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 American Rancher “This November in Sonoma County, California, they're going to try and ban all family farms and factory farms located in the county” This ballot initiative would eliminate family livestock farming that is so important in Sonoma County,” he said. “There will be no eggs, chicken, dairy, cheese, lamb and other livestock from Sonoma County in your supermarkets if this initiative passes.” The ordinance, as written, would phase out medium- and large- sized concentrated agricultural feeding operations. If the ballot initiative passes, it would threaten hundreds of family and multigenerational farms, while immediately shuttering about 60 Sponsors of this ordinance aim “to get rid of animal agriculture all together, everywhere” and are “using this legislation as a means to start the process of wiping out farms. “This is just the beginning.” “This is an attack on our food sovereignty, our food security, and our American ranchers there in the area. So do your job, do your part, make the phone call — get this off the ballot”

Video Transcript AI Summary

In November, Sonoma County, California plans to ban family and factory farms. Call the county clerk's office to oppose this attack on food sovereignty and American ranchers. Take action on Monday to get this off the ballot.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So this November in Sonoma County, California, they're going to try and ban all family farms and factory farms located in the county. I'm gonna be putting the phone number to the county clerk's office below. Let's make sure to bombard them with phone calls just like we did in Idaho and get this reversed and taken off the ballot. This is an attack on our food sovereignty, our food security, and our American ranchers there in the area. So do your job. Do your part. Make the phone call Monday morning. Let's get this off the ballot.

@wideawake_media — Wide Awake Media

Posted - July 9, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Saved - July 9, 2024 at 10:21 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The American farmer warns about the U.S. government's deliberate attack on agriculture, claiming it aims to control food and people. They express concerns about land and water rights being regulated and taken away. Supporting local farmers and buying local is urged.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

American farmer issues a dire warning about the U.S. government's intentional war on agriculture. "This administration's agenda is to control the food and control the people." "They're trying to kill off the American farmer... trying to regulate our land, take our land, take our water rights." "It is time to wake up and start supporting your local farmers, and buy local." Credit: @StephanieNashM1

Video Transcript AI Summary

This administration aims to control food and people. Biden wants extreme heat rules for outdoor workers at just 80 degrees Fahrenheit. They're targeting American farmers, regulating land and water rights. Support local farmers, buy local to fight back against these threats.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I hope you blow this shit up and listen because I've told you again and again, this administration's agenda is to control the food and control the people. Biden wants to push OSHA into an extreme heat index for outside workers. You guys wanna know what he thinks is hot? 80 degrees Fahrenheit. Let me tell you. Here in Tennessee, it gets humid, and I push past because guess what? My girl still gotta get fed, and that's my priority. And I chose this life in agriculture to feed you and your families, and they are trying to put fear in our lives. They're trying to kill off the American farmer. I know. We moved from California because regulations were getting so bad, and they were providing water to Los Angeles and San Francisco instead of the Central Valley. And they're doing it across America, trying to regulate our land, take our land, take our water rights. It is happening. It is time to wake up and start supporting your local farmers and buy local.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - August 3, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Saved - August 3, 2024 at 2:32 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The US government is set to vote on new regulations this November that could severely impact small ranchers. The proposed mandate requires costly water treatment programs for local butcher shops and large packers, with expenses reaching up to $2.3 million for equipment and an additional $500,000 annually for installation and regulation. This move threatens local food systems and limits consumer choices, pushing people towards large packers that dominate the industry. I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this situation. Remember to support American and local producers.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is Serious 🚨 US Government voting on new regulations this November that are so expensive they will force small ranchers out of business Mandating new equipment that will cost up to $2.3 million plus $500k to install and regulate each year “This is an attack on our food system” “So this November, the EPA is gonna be voting on a bill to implement new water treatment programs into all local butcher shops all the way up to the big packers. Now these new water treatment programs are gonna be costing up to $2,300,000 just for all the new equipment and an additional $500,000 to get them installed and regulated into each year. This is an attack on our food system if you were trying to buy locally or from your local producers or from the local butcher shops. They simply do not have the money or the revenue to support this. So in a roundabout way, they're taking away your freedom and your right and our right to sell meat directly to the consumer. They're taking away our rights to buy what we want and consume and put in our bodies what we would like. They're forcing us into a box and forcing you guys to buy from the big packers that control 85% of the industry right now. I'm curious to see what y'all think about this. And as always, guys, buy American and buy local.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

In November, the EPA will vote on a bill to add costly water treatment programs to butcher shops, impacting local producers. This move limits consumer choice and favors big packers. The cost is high for small businesses, potentially restricting access to locally sourced meat. The shift may push consumers towards larger corporations controlling most of the industry. Share your thoughts and remember to support American and local businesses.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So this November, the EPA is gonna be voting on a bill to implement new water treatment programs into all local butcher shops, all the way up to the big packers. Now these new water treatment programs are gonna be costing up to $2,300,000 just for all the new equipment and an additional $500,000 to get them installed and regulated into each year. This is an attack on our food system if you were trying to buy locally or from your local producers or from the local butcher shops. They simply do not have the money or the revenue to support this. So in a roundabout way, they're taking away your freedom and your right and our right to sell meat directly to the consumer. They're taking away our rights to buy what we want and consume and put in our bodies what we would like. They're forcing us into a box and forcing you guys to buy from the big packers that control 85% of the industry right now. I'm curious to see what y'all think about this. And as always, guys, buy American and buy local.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - October 29, 2024 at 12:58 PM

Saved - October 29, 2024 at 2:10 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m raising awareness about the serious implications of mRNA vaccines being tested on livestock. In a recent study of 525 hogs, significant health issues arose: 25 deaths, 55 near-death conditions, and various other ailments. Autopsies revealed remnants of the live virus vaccine in the meat, raising concerns for both consumers and producers. This situation is alarming, especially with the potential for these initiatives to resurface if Democrats gain power. I urge everyone to share this information and support local American producers.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

For voters who forgot, Democrats are the party pushing mRNA vaccines on our livestock American Rancher Exposing mRNA Tests on Livestock “They took 525 hogs, injected them with a live mRNA vaccine and in 21 days, these were the statistics - 25 of them suffered from death - 55 of them became so anorexic that they were near death - 20 of them suffered from lameness - 12 of them suffered from loss of condition - and 25 more of them had near death symptoms” “Let's dig into the statistics sheet about mRNA vaccines in live animals and why this is a concern not only as a consumer, but as a producer as well So we have 70% of these animals that are gonna be okay to an extent, and then we have 30% of them that either have died or have near death symptoms. They did autopsies on the ones that had passed away, and they still found remnants of the live virus vaccine inside the meat of these animals. So from a consumer standpoint we have to worry about a live virus being inside of our meat that we're putting inside of our bodies, and as a producer stand point, we have to worry about the health of our animals that can ultimately destroy us, destroy our herd, and destroy our business altogether. I'm interested to see what you all think about this, so make sure you leave a comment, share it around. Let's get this information out there and make people aware. And as always, guys, buy American and buy local.” This is EXTREMELY SERIOUS, if Democrats win you can 100% count on them restarting all these insane climate change and vaccine initiatives. The only reason they slowed down is because we entered an election year Only Donald Trump and Robert Kennedy Jr will stop this

Video Transcript AI Summary

A study involving 525 hogs injected with a live mRNA vaccine revealed concerning outcomes. After 21 days, 25 hogs died, 55 became severely anorexic, 20 experienced lameness, and 12 showed loss of condition. Overall, 30% of the animals either died or exhibited near-death symptoms. Autopsies revealed remnants of the live virus vaccine in the meat of deceased hogs, raising consumer health concerns regarding the presence of a live virus in meat products. For producers, this situation poses risks to animal health, herd viability, and business sustainability. It’s important to spread awareness about these findings and support local American products.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Let's dig into the statistics sheet about mRNA vaccines in live animals and why this is a concern not only as a consumer, but as a producer as well. They took 525 hogs, injected them with a live mRNA vaccine, and in 21 days, these were the statistics. 25 of them suffered from death. 55 of them became so anorexic that they were near death. 20 of them suffered from lameness, 12 of them suffered from loss of condition, and 25 more of them had near death symptoms. So we have 70% of these animals that are gonna be okay to an extent, and then we have 30% of them that either have died or have near death symptoms. They did autopsies on the ones that had passed away, and they still found remnants of the live virus vaccine inside the meat of these animals. So from a consumer standpoint, we have to worry about a live virus being inside of our meat that we're putting inside of our bodies. And as a producer standpoint, we have to worry about the health of our animals that can ultimately destroy us, destroy our herd, and destroy our business altogether. I'm interested to see what y'all think about this, so make sure you leave a comment. Share it around. Let's get this information out there and make people aware. And as always, guys, buy American and buy local.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - November 3, 2024 at 1:38 PM

Saved - November 3, 2024 at 4:03 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I want to highlight a critical issue: Democrats recently voted against a bill that would have mandated clear labeling for meat products containing mRNA vaccines. Currently, mRNA vaccines are being used in various species, including shrimp and pork, but we lack data on the extent of this practice. Some companies are customizing vaccines for farms without proper testing or research. This situation poses significant risks, and with the bill's rejection, I fear similar actions could happen in Canada next. This is a dangerous trend that needs attention.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Democrats VOTED DOWN a bill that would have forced all meat products to clearly be label if injected mRNA vaccines “mRNA vaccines are entering our food chain in several species. So currently all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA. Currently pork is an unknown amount is being vaccinated with mRNA.” “Some of the companies state on their advertising, we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine. So they have vaccines going into the swine industry. We don't have data on how much of it's being sold and where and who are the buyers.” “a customized vaccines where they go on to a farm, they take samples of the of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab and a few days later they produce an mRNA vaccine for your customized to your farm's diseases. There's no testing, no research, nothing.” - John Graff, a nutritionist, chemist, process engineer, agribusiness executive, and a board director of the National Citizen’s Inquiry Speaking of impact taking place in Canada right now. Know Democrats shut down the bill requiring labeling here in America, so we are next. This is extremely, extremely dangerous.

Video Transcript AI Summary

mRNA vaccines are being introduced into the food chain, particularly in farmed shrimp and swine. Merck, known for ivermectin, has remained quiet about its financial losses during COVID, possibly due to its ownership of several mRNA companies. These companies advertise customized vaccines for livestock, created by sampling diseases on farms and producing tailored mRNA vaccines in a matter of days. However, there is a lack of data on the extent of these vaccines' use and no thorough testing or research on the specific antigens involved. The understanding of mRNA technology is general, but detailed knowledge about each antigen is absent.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: MRNA vaccines are entering our food chain in several species. So currently, all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA. Currently, Hork is an unknown amount is being vaccinated with mRNA. It's Merck, who we know as the, one of the originators of ivermectin, and you wonder why they didn't make a big fuss at the amount of money they lost during COVID because of the the inability to sell ivermectin into the whole thing. They could have been a a kingpin in this and they were silent. Why is because they own a lot of mRNA companies. Some of the companies state on their advertising, we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine. So they have vaccines going into the swine industry. We don't have data on how much of it's being sold and where and who are the buyers. So it's all speculative on the volume, but the technology is rather interesting. It's a customized vaccines where they go onto a farm. They take samples of the of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab and a few days later, they produce an mRNA vaccine for your customized to your farm's diseases. There's no testing, no research, nothing. They have a general, understanding of the mRNA aspect of it on a general standpoint. But for each of these antigens, there is no understanding.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 15, 2025 at 10:23 PM

Saved - February 16, 2025 at 1:26 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Bird Flu has driven egg prices to record highs. I discovered that just before the outbreak, the US Government was pushing for a bill to enforce electronic ear tags on cattle, which many farmers believe would threaten their livelihoods and cattle production. An American cattle rancher warned that the USDA would use the Bird Flu situation to implement this mandate. Shortly after his warning, the USDA did indeed mandate EID Tags for cattle and bison under the guise of "Disease Traceability." It feels like an uncanny coincidence.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Bird Flu has caused egg prices to hit a new record high today Here’s what you were never told about the “Bird Flu outbreak” Right before Bird Flu started becoming a problem in America, US Government was looking for a way to pass and enforce their electronic ear tag on cattle bill. This would allow radical liberal environmental groups access to regulate all cattle in America, mandate vaccines being used and slowing shrinking the amount of cattle you’re allowed to own. Many farmers said ultimately this would put them out of business and end cattle production in America American Cattle Rancher warned the USDA would use a Bird Flu outbreak to start the EID Tags on cattle mandate Awhile after he made this video wouldn’t you know it, The USDA mandated EID Tags on cattle and bison for the reason of “Disease Traceability,” so they could track the Bird Flue outbreak I mean what are the odds!? Another amazing “coincidence”……

Video Transcript AI Summary

I warned you all about the coming EIDs when this bird flu stuff started. Now the USDA is saying that within six months, all cattle will need mandatory EID tags. It sounds like all beef cattle, every kind of cattle, is going to have to be tagged. But calves and yearlings should be okay, it sounds like its breeding cattle. The only way the USDA could implement this in six months is if they've already had a stockpile of tags. It feels like they knew this was coming and accomplished what they wanted to do. This really sucks for the guys that don't have facilities and just want a few head of cows in their backyard. We better get our taggers ready because I knew it was coming.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Had my cattle friends watched the feeder flash this morning? Now I warned a bunch of my friends when this bird flu bullshit come out, and it and it is bullshit that EIDs were coming. Speaker 1: The USDA come down on Friday is they have said that within six months, all sexually intact cattle. I mean, all cattle, all beef cattle, every kind of cattle, are are going to have to be, mandatory ID, EID tagged. It has to be a cattle, basically all breeding cattle. So our calves and yearlings are okay. Speaker 0: Now the only way that the USDA could fucking pigeons. Could implement this in six months is if they've already had a stockpile of tags. They knew what they were doing. They've accomplished what they were doing. This is bullshit. And it really sucks for the this, you know, the guys that don't have facilities and just want a few head of cows in their in their backyard. So we'll see what comes out of this, but I guess you boys better we better get our taggers ready because we I knew it was coming.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - May 6, 2025 at 5:14 AM

Saved - May 6, 2025 at 10:43 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve uncovered that U.S. taxpayers subsidize Coca Cola with $10 billion annually, cleverly hidden in the farm bill. This bill, which totals $428 billion, allocates $328 billion to food stamp recipients who purchase Coca Cola and other products. Coca Cola relies on taxpayer money for 5-20% of its revenue, raising questions about its business model. Meanwhile, legislators mislead voters about farm subsidies, as most funds benefit large corporations rather than farmers. This is a clear example of government waste impacting our food supply.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

US Taxpayers subsidize Coca Cola $10 BILLION dollars every year Congress has been cleverly hiding the funding in the annual “Farm bill” “Congress subsidizes Coca Cola to the tune of about $10,000,000,000 of taxpayer money every single year — We have this scam, otherwise known as the farm bill, which really should be known as the food stamp and big corporation bill passed by congress. The last one that we passed, the total amount was $428,000,000,000 with a b dollars and $328 billion of that $428 billion went directly to food stamp recipients to SNAP. — The government loads $328 billion of your tax care money on the EBT cards for SNAP recipients, and they go into the stores and they buy Coca Cola products, Frito Lay products, Pepsi products. This $10,000,000,000 is just to Coca Cola every year. Coca Cola gets between 5-20% of their annual revenue from the taxpayer dime. Ding ding ding. That right there is government waste. We could cut because if your products are so great and healthy for everybody. Why don't you stand on your own two feet, Coca Cola? Why don't you just operate without taxpayer money if you're so great? And the cherry on top is how our legislators have figured out they can play this little game and go back to their home voters and tell them how evil the farmers and ranchers are because of the farm bill and the subsidies. Meanwhile, 3/4 of it doesn't even go to the farmers, and it goes to all their buddies in big corporations. That's what your government has done. Congress, men, and women come back home and have the audacity to lie to the American people about what they have done to the American people's food supply.“

Video Transcript AI Summary

Congress subsidizes Coca-Cola with approximately $10 billion of taxpayer money annually through the farm bill, which is essentially a food stamp and big corporation bill. The last bill totaled $428 billion, with $328 billion going to SNAP recipients and roughly $100 billion to farm subsidies and other programs. Farm subsidies are intended to support farmers and ranchers during difficult years. SNAP recipients use their EBT cards to purchase Coca-Cola, Frito Lay, and Pepsi products. Coca-Cola receives between 5-20% of its annual revenue from taxpayer money. This is government waste because Coca-Cola should operate without taxpayer money if their products are so great. Legislators mislead voters by blaming farmers and ranchers for the farm bill's costs, while the majority of the funds benefit big corporations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So congress subsidizes Coca Cola to the tune of about $10,000,000,000 of taxpayer money every single year. What are you talking about, Claire? I'm glad you asked. Let me explain. So we have this scam, otherwise known as the farm bill, which really should known as the food stamp and big corporation bill passed by congress. And the last one that we passed, the total amount was 428,000,000,000 with a b dollars, and 328,000,000,000 of that $428,000,000,000 went directly to food stamp recipients to snap the other roughly hundred billion went to farm subsidies and a couple other programs mind you there are safeguards on the farm subsidy program. You have to qualify to get a farm subsidy. And if you do get a subsidy, it is not saving the freaking farm. Far from it. It's a program that helps hold over farmers and ranchers in drought years and bad years so that we don't lose the already dwindling agriculture population we have in America because our ag economy is so tanked by our government. But I digress. Let me get back to my point. The government loads three $328,000,000,000 of your taxpayer money on the EBT cards for snap recipients and they go into the stores and they buy Coca Cola products, Frito Lay products, Pepsi products. This $10,000,000,000 is just to Coca Cola every year. Coca Cola gets between 520% of their annual revenue from the taxpayer dime. Ding ding ding. That right there is government waste we could cut because if your products are so great and healthy for everybody, why don't you stand on your own two feet Coca Cola? And why don't you just operate without taxpayer money if you're so great? And the cherry on top is how our legislators have figured out they can play this little game and go back to their home voters and tell them how evil the farmers and ranchers are because of the farm bill and the subsidies. Meanwhile, three quarters of it doesn't even go to the farmers, and it goes to all their buddies and big corporations. That's what your government has done. Congressmen and women come back home and have the audacity to lie to the American people about what they have done to the American people's food supply. Anyway, I'm Claire Dunn. Follow me for more, and I'll keep explaining agriculture. I'm an artist songwriter. We have tour dates all across the country. Come see us at a live Stream my new music. Cowboy's state of mind is my most recent song. It's on all streaming platforms. Love you guys. Thanks so much for watching.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - May 13, 2025 at 1:42 PM

Saved - May 13, 2025 at 4:13 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m concerned about proposed changes in Colorado that could threaten farming and ranching. A new committee, excluding farmers and ranchers, would make decisions about public and private lands under the guise of conservation. This could lead to restrictions based on the designation of endangered species, potentially crippling land use. For instance, if a species like a squirrel is labeled endangered, it could impose numerous limitations on property owners. This feels like an activist agenda aimed at controlling land use across the state.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Democrats in Colorado are preparing to permanently end farming in the state “This would be the end of farming and ranching and private (farm) land ownership in Colorado” “There's something happening in Colorado which is not so good. The corridor of people that don't understand the rural lifestyle that live in all the cities in Colorado are controlling that state. This would be the end of farming and ranching and private land ownership in Colorado. Because what they propose is that they want to set up a committee that cannot have any farmers and ranchers on the committee to decide what happens to our public lands and private lands in the name of conservation. They want to be able to say that any, put any species on the state endangered species list, which would dictate what you can do on your land if you have that species on there. So they could just say, oh, this squirrel is endangered. And now you have 400 restrictions on your property that you can't use it. You for this. You can't cut down this tree. You can't move cattle in this area. This is activist environmental proposal to take over that entire state. Because if they get control of that, they can literally dictate the use of any land, public or private, in the name of conservation.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

A situation is unfolding in Colorado where urban residents are allegedly controlling the state, potentially ending farming, ranching, and private land ownership. A proposed committee, excluding farmers and ranchers, would decide the fate of public and private lands under the guise of conservation. This committee could designate any species as endangered, imposing restrictions on land use if that species is present. This could lead to hundreds of restrictions, dictating activities like tree cutting or cattle movement. The speaker characterizes this as an activist environmental proposal to seize control of the entire state, enabling them to dictate land use, both public and private, in the name of conservation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There's something happening in Colorado, which is not so good. The corridor of people that don't understand the rural lifestyle that live in all the cities in Colorado are controlling that state. This would be the end of farming and ranching and private land ownership in Colorado. Because what they propose is that they want to set up a committee that cannot have any farmers and ranchers on the committee to decide what happens to our public lands and private lands in the name of conservation. They want to be able to say that any put any species on the state endangered species list, which would dictate what you can do on your land if you have that species on there. They could just say, oh, this squirrel is endangered, and now you have 400 restrictions on your property that you can't use it. You forget this. You can't do cut down this tree. You can't move cattle in this area. This is an activist environmental proposal to take over that entire state because if they get control of that, they can literally dictate the use of any land, public or private, in the name of conservation.

@newstart_2024 — Camus

Posted - September 27, 2025 at 7:57 AM

Saved - September 27, 2025 at 12:30 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

They are systematically dismantling our food supply, targeting traditional farmers through a calculated campaign. Once, 'organic' and 'grass-fed' were standard practices, not premium labels. The strategy involves coercing farmers into using harmful chemicals, offering subsidies to not grow food, and inflating fertilizer costs—all under the guise of environmentalism. The ultimate goal is to control the food supply by eradicating independent farms. I urge everyone to support local farmers and choose real food over engineered products. Every purchase is a vote for health and sovereignty.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

They are systematically dismantling the foundation of our food supply, and the story is more calculated than you think. A compelling narrative outlines the deliberate campaign against the traditional farmer. It begins with a simple truth: there was a time when ‘organic’ and ‘grass-fed’ were not premium labels, but simply how food was grown. The strategy, as detailed, is a multi-phase assault. First, farmers were coerced into using government-mandated chemicals, degrading the land and impacting public health. Then, they were enticed with subsidies not to grow food, a scheme masked as environmentalism that artificially drives up prices and creates scarcity. The economic pressure is then intensified. Fertilizer costs are deliberately inflated, while domestic funding is stripped and redirected overseas. The justification? A manufactured "climate crisis," absurdly pinpointing livestock as a primary culprit. Meanwhile, a glaring contradiction emerges: the world’s largest landowners champion a dystopian food future of insect protein and lab-grown substitutes. The agenda is clear: 1. Seize control of the food supply at its source. 2. Eradicate the independent farming industry, piece by piece. 3. Ensure family farms are lost forever through punitive measures like inheritance tax. The ultimate goal is control. No farmers means no real food. And when you control the food, you control the population. The call to action is not just a choice, but a act of defiance. The solution lies in bypassing the system. Support your local farmers. Choose grass-fed meats, un-homogenized milk, and real free-range eggs from farm shops. Reject the engineered, weak-making products that line supermarket shelves. Every purchase is a vote. Choose to vote for sovereignty, for health, and for the preservation of real food.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Story: they say 'organic food was just food,' 'grass fed beef was just beef,' and 'raw milk was just milk.' Farmers seeking real healthy food were 'forced to use government issued pesticides and chemicals.' They describe schemes where farmers were 'paid to not grow food,' told to plant wildflowers and scatter bird seed, raising prices as fertilizer costs rose. '£500,000,000' was taken away from farmers and handed to farmers abroad. They blame a 'climate crisis' and say 'cow's farts' are the problem. They claim 'world's largest landowners' push for us to eat bugs and lab grown foods, 'to wipe out the farming industry piece by piece.' 'No farmers means no real food.' Support local farmers: buy from farm shops, grass-fed meats, unhomogenized milk, and real free range eggs.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Let me tell you a little story about why they're trying to wipe out the farmers. Once upon a time, organic food was just food. Grass fed beef was just beef, and raw milk, that's right, was just milk. Crazy. Right? But then things started to change. Farmers who just want to grow real healthy food for the people were forced to legally use government issued pesticides and chemicals. This ruined the land and made the people sick. Then came the schemes. Farmers were offered money. They were literally paid to not grow food. Instead, they were told to grow wildflowers and scatter bird seed. Sounds nice on the surface, but what happens when less food gets grown? Prices rise and scarcity sets in. At the same time, fertilizer costs quadrupled. And here's the kicker. £500,000,000 was taken away from our farmers and handed to farmers abroad. You have to ask yourself why. They blame the so called climate crisis and say cow's farts are the problem. Really? Meanwhile, the world's largest landowners are pushing for us to eat bugs and lab grown foods. It's just all part of the agenda. To one, control what goes into our food. Two, to wipe out the farming industry piece by piece. And three, to make sure family farms are lost to inheritance tax forever. It's all part of the bigger plan because remember this, no farmers means no real food. When you control the food supply, you control the people. So here's what you can do. Support your local farmers whenever you can. Buy from farm shops, choose grass fed hand reared meats, unhomogenized milk, and real free range eggs. Stop filling your body with supermarket food like products. These are designed to keep you weak because every time you buy local, you're keeping real food alive.

@newstart_2024 — Camus

Posted - November 8, 2025 at 11:46 AM

Saved - December 11, 2025 at 7:49 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read a leaked document claiming that by 2030 farmed animals would be cut in half and by 2050 traditional farming would end, replaced by lab-made protein. It ties Keir Starmer and Bill Gates to this plan, portraying sustainability as a cover for control over farms, food, and people through patented, processed options. The document is out, and the question remains: how long before we push back?

@newstart_2024 - Camus

2030 Agenda: Starmer & Gates' Plan for Farm Animals? A leaked document reportedly reveals a shocking plan: by 2030, farmed animals are to be cut in half—and by 2050, a total shutdown of traditional farming. No livestock. No independent farmers. A full transition to synthetic, lab-made protein. And the names tied to it? Keir Starmer and Bill Gates. The same duo preaching “sustainability” while quietly signing off on what could become the biggest assault on food freedom in history. This isn’t about saving the planet—it’s about control. Control the farms, control the food, control the people. The elites are building a future where everything we eat is patented, processed, and permission-based. They think the public won’t notice until it’s too late. But now the document is out—and the evidence is written in black and white. The question is, how long before we push back?

Video Transcript AI Summary

This transcript states that by 2030 there is to be a 50% reduction in farmed animals, and by 2050 a hundred percent zero farm animal system in place. It claims that Starman and Bill Gates have signed up to that, stating “Yes, the two biggest assholes in the world, Starman and Bill Gates. What more proof do I want?” The speaker says they have it in writing and asserts that “their little world takeover is coming along nicely for them, but unfortunately, we've now got the document.” The speaker warns that “World War four commence. We don't need to be at war with Russia. We're gonna create our internal one.” The closing line is “Keep Britain farming, folks.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This is serious now, guys. I'm in, receipt of a document which states that by 2030, there is to be a 50% reduction in farmed animals, and by 2050, a hundred percent zero farm animal system in place. And guess who has signed up to that? Yes, the two biggest assholes in the world, Starman and Bill Gates. What more proof do I want? And I've got it in writing. So it looks like their little world takeover is coming along nicely for them, but unfortunately, we've now got the document. So over it was now, guys, at World War four commence. We don't need to be at war with Russia. We're gonna create our internal one. Keep Britain farming, folks.

@DerrickEvans4WV — Derrick Evans

Posted - December 11, 2025 at 2:58 AM

Saved - December 11, 2025 at 10:00 PM

@DerrickEvans4WV - Derrick Evans

Listen to these old hog farmers talk about how they were put out of business, then they did the same thing to the chicken farmers, now they are trying to do the same thing to the cattle farmers. They want everything controlled by just a few corporations. Bing back small farms. https://t.co/qUyPa1qO5W

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the decline of the hog business after years in it. They say they stayed in the pig business for years until the market was destroyed, and they got out in 1990-1995 because “you can't sell.” They note they weren’t paid for the protein they bought. They describe a lack of profitability: “They didn't pay for the protein we bought.” They recall trying to price things, saying, “send $16 a 100 with 16¢ a pound per damn pound.” Wilbur is mentioned as someone who thought he’d get rich, but it was worthless. He bought 60-pound feeder pigs for $5 a head and sold them for 8¢ a pound, with a hog bringing “$24.35 a hog for a number one.” They emphasize that prices never came down in the grocery store. The government is criticized for wanting consolidation and integration, aiming to “put everybody out of the hog business but the great big giant one,” akin to the chicken industry. They mention Tyson and Arkansas as players forming a large integrated system. They say, “Now they're in a the only one they ain't got integrated yet beef,” and they discuss “giner and giner ones out west with two or 3,000 brood cows” who have their own beef operations. The speakers recount the collapse of the hog industry, noting that “there's no market slap” and that the market was destroyed. They mention a person in Geneva who bought up the biggest operations, suggesting that those who harmed others would be the next to fail, and indeed “in two years' time they were out of bed.” They recount a shift where, at one point, you could haul a few hogs to Georgia, but then Georgia closed down. They describe packing plants: “They had a packing plant for hogs in Dothan, the first one to go, and they sold it and turned it into a chicken butchering glass.” The Sunnyland-Elba area is referenced. They say packers bought “fat sows that were already butchered by the big company,” bringing in carcasses, cutting them up one by one, which effectively eliminated the smaller operations. Finally, they explain the geographical movement: Georgia went out of business, so they had to haul hogs to South Carolina. They could haul only a few miles in the summer, and “a few miles, you was lucky to haul them once you up there.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: How long were y'all in the, pig business? Speaker 1: For years until the market was destroyed. Speaker 0: 9095, we got out. We couldn't you can't sell. Speaker 1: They didn't pay for the protein we bought. Speaker 0: Yeah. We can't stand send $16 a 100 with 16¢ a pound per damn pound. Speaker 1: Wilbur, he thought he'd get rich. It was worthless. He'd buy 60 pound feeder pigs for $5 a head. He said, I can't lose. You know what he sold them for? 8¢. Number one's 8¢ a pound. Speaker 0: So he Speaker 1: had $24.35 a hog for a number one. Speaker 0: Dang. Speaker 1: Never come down at all in the grocery store. Speaker 0: And they never the Speaker 1: government They've completely said a word. They completely they wanna consolidate and integrate. They wanna put everybody out of the hog business but the great big giant one just like the chicken tongue. Speaker 0: They bring the hogs and put them in where you feed. President. That's part of his and his Tyson buddies out of Arkansas. Yeah. Speaker 1: So now they're in a the only one they ain't got integrated yet beef, and they're working on that. They're getting them giner and giner. Ones out west with two or 3,000 brood cows and all that have their own beef They and Speaker 0: got Buddha on. Do y'all think that you think that Speaker 1: where we always made everybody. There's no market slap. They destroyed the market. That guy down there in Geneva bought all them all, the biggest one. Oh, yeah, they'll come back. You need to keep in bed. I said, No, you put all of us out and you'll be next. When there ain't none of us left, then you won't be left, and sure enough, in two years' time they were out of bed. This time it was in there. Then you could haul a few to Georgia. Georgia. Georgia. Then they closed down. They had a packing plant for hogs in Dothan, the first one to go, and they sold it and turned it into a chicken butchering glass. Sunnyland. Elba Yeah. Pack, they went out of business and all they did was Speaker 0: Bought fat sows. Speaker 1: Fat sows that were already butchered by the big company and brought in there and they bought the carcasses hanging and cut them up. One by one it took care of Speaker 0: all of Speaker 1: them. Then they got where they couldn't. Georgia went out of business, so you had to haul them to South Carolina. That was the last one. From here to South Carolina, you could haul them. You can't haul haul through the summertime. A few miles, you was lucky to haul them once you Speaker 0: up there.

@ValerieAnne1970 — Valerie Anne Smith

Posted - January 11, 2026 at 11:38 AM

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 2:53 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m reporting a claim that Bayer’s Glyphosate‑Free Roundup swaps glyphosate for diquat, a neurotoxin allegedly linked to cancer and a 126% Parkinson’s risk rise. It outlines kidney failure, digestive burns, microbiome destruction, lung damage, brain injury, liver stress, heart and muscle harm, and warns proximity to treated areas raises risk. It highlights US bill AB‑453, the Pesticide Shield Act, as shielding Bayer from lawsuits, with a 2026 showdown.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Shocking update on Bayer's "Glyphosate-Free" Roundup—it's now loaded with DIQUAT, 200X MORE poisonous! After acquiring Monsanto & facing massive lawsuits over Roundup's original formula, Bayer swapped out glyphosate for DIQUAT, touting it as a safer option for gardens & yards. But the truth? Diquat is a deadly neurotoxin linked to cancer & it boosts Parkinson's risk by 126% in people & animals. Already outlawed in several nations for triggering widespread organ damage, DIQUAT wreaks havoc through oxidative stress. Here's the breakdown of its brutal effects: - Kidneys: Primary victim—builds up and destroys tubules, leading to total failure and often death in severe cases. - Digestive System: Burns and inflames the mouth, throat, and stomach right away. - Gut Health: Ruins the microbiome by wiping out good bacteria like Lactobacillus, sparking inflammation and worsening toxicity everywhere. - Lungs: Triggers swelling, failure, and even scarring. - Brain & Nerves: Causes confusion, seizures, coma, and permanent damage—living near treated areas hikes Parkinson's by 126%. - Liver: Overwhelms with stress, causing inflammation and dysfunction. - Heart: Damages muscle tissue, leading to collapse and necrosis. - Muscles: Breaks down tissue, releasing toxins that hammer the kidneys further. And now, the US bill AB-453—dubbed the "Pesticide Shield Act"—is pushing for full legal protection for companies like Bayer/Monsanto. It blocks extra warnings, kills lawsuits for hidden dangers & strips rights from victims. Already through initial votes, it's set for a decisive 2026 showdown, thanks to heavy industry lobbying. And now, the US bill AB-453—dubbed the "Pesticide Shield Act"—is pushing for full legal protection for companies like Bayer/Monsanto. It blocks extra warnings, kills lawsuits for hidden dangers, and strips rights from victims. Already through initial votes, it's set for a decisive 2026 showdown, thanks to heavy industry lobbying. This is about more than weeds—it's our health on the line! Spread the word if you're outraged.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Bayer has removed glyphosate from Roundup weed killer, and according to the speaker, this is presented as good news only to reveal a new toxic lineup being sprayed in homes and public spaces. The speaker notes that all of these ingredients are horrible, with special emphasis on Dequat dibromide, which is stated as not only banned in the European Union but also more toxic than glyphosate and capable of damaging the gut, kidneys, liver, and nervous system. Despite these warnings, the speaker asserts that this mixture is still being sprayed. The message is that the problem with Roundup isn’t that it’s fixed, but that it’s not fixed at all—the product has not been made safe; instead, it has been rebranded, swapping one toxic chemical for four others, and the public is being led to believe it is safe. In addition to the product changes, the speaker highlights a legislative development: AB 453. This bill is described as shielding pesticide companies from liability in court, even if their chemicals cause harm. The speaker asserts that this reduces accountability and results in more toxins being sprayed near families. The overall claim is that Bayer did not make Roundup safer by removing glyphosate; rather, they replaced it with a new set of toxic ingredients, and now a state bill would protect manufacturers from legal consequences related to any harm caused by these chemicals.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In case you haven't heard, Bayer removed glyphosate from Roundup weed killer. Sounds like good news. Right? Until you see what they replaced it with. Here is the new toxic lineup that they are spraying in your yards, your parks, your schools, your golf courses, and in your neighborhoods. All of these ingredients are horrible especially Dequat dibromide which is not only banned in the European Union, more toxic than glyphosate, but damages your gut, your kidneys, your liver and your nervous system yet we're still allowing this to be sprayed. They didn't fix roundup they just rebranded the poison and switched one toxic chemical for four and they want you to believe that it's safe. And now here's the worst part They're now pushing through AB four fifty three, a bill that shields pesticides companies from being liable in court even if their chemicals cause you harm. So that means less accountability and more toxins being sprayed near your family.