TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - June 17, 2023 at 3:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US Navy is under fire for a policy that encourages sailors to discuss gender identity, sex, STDs, and pregnancy with their children as young as 12 without notifying parents. The Navy official admitted that the policy circumvents parental rights. A Navy nurse practitioner suggested that parents' lack of acceptance of the trans agenda is the reason for suicides. The policy is being investigated to see if it is enforced across all branches of the military. The government is accused of grooming children of service members into Marxist ideologies.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

This week in Bahrain the Navy told sailors that they talk to their children at age 12 about gender identity, sex, STD’s, pregnancy, etc. without notifying parents. When asked if "the Navy’s policy circumvents a parents right to know?" the @USNavy official answered "Yes". Insane.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the use of the PHQ-9 and HEADSSS interviews for children. The HEADSSS interview covers safety, suicide, and sex. The speaker emphasizes the importance of asking tough questions about gender identity, crushes, and sexual activity. They mention that parents cannot access their children's medical records online until they are 15 or 16, depending on state law. The speaker explains that children can seek mental health care, birth control, and pregnancy tests without parental knowledge. The interviewer expresses concern about parents being kept in the dark and disagrees with the policy. The speaker encourages open communication between parents and children but acknowledges that some parents may not be receptive. The interview ends with a discussion about the navy's policy and the speaker's role as an advocate for children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Besides that PHQ 9 at 12 years old, we're also doing a heads interview. Heads is an interview it's an, acronym. H e a d s s s. We're going to the 3 s's. One of them is safety, And that's as simple as, oh, are you wearing your bike helmet when you ride your skateboard or ride your bike? Do you wear your seat belt? You're welcome, Stacey. But then the next s goes into suicide. And I am asking That question, do you have thoughts of hurting or killing yourself? And the last s is a subject that no Sex. But it's happening. You don't wanna know about it, but it's happening even here, Lauren. But this generation is definitely more open with experiencing And and experimenting. And so I ask those tough questions. Do you identify as a male, female, non binary. Do if you had a crush on someone, is it a male or a female? Do you have a significant other? And, yes, I'm asking them if they are having sex. At 12 years old, like sex. At 12 years old 12 years old, not the clinic policy, Not AOR policy. It is Big Navy, Human, DHA. At 12 years old, parents cannot look at their children's medical records online. At 15 or 16 because it depends on state law, but that is on average, that's the most the biggest time is 15 or 16 years old. There are 4 things a child Can come into clinic without can schedule their own appointment, and we don't have to tell the parents. Mental health, so Anxiety, depression. I do have, man I'm a mandatory reporter, so I do have to tell parents about any thoughts or for plans to kill someone else and themselves. But just regular anxiety, depression, I can see them without telling their parents. It's gonna hurt some people. Of their parents. It's gonna hurt some people. Birth control. Birth control. We have those conversations with the kids. How important is it that you have that open rapport with your kids so you can talk to them before When they're coming to their PCL. What goes along with that? Pregnancy tests. 15, Speaker 1: When did this policy of preventing parents from being able to access their minor children's medical records start? Speaker 0: I'm not sure of what had happened online. So the question was, when did it start on, not allowing, parents to see minor children's medical records? I'm not sure. I've been a practicing move rider for 6 years, and that's as far as I've known that it's been the case that you're not allowed to see once you're 12 years old. You can come into clinic, and you can to request those records, but you can't get it online. Speaker 1: So it's just only online? Speaker 0: Correct. Speaker 1: So if a parent wants to come in and find out what's going on with their children's, Quote, unquote, care. They have full access to those medical records, and the providers can't hide any of that or keep these conversations secret from the parents. Speaker 0: If they come in. And I would also I would definitely recommend. So when they come in for any of these concerns and their parents don't know, I encourage them. I build that rapport, and I encourage them to talk so parents because then think about it if they have that trust that provider and then you're coming in and getting their medical It's you're breaking that trust. You're not building that trust with that child. Speaker 1: So the only issue I have with that, They're a minor child. They are not of consenting age. Correct? So if we're sitting there, I'm Speaker 0: I'm I Speaker 1: can They can't they can't So I don't understand how, like because I I have a 17 year old and almost 12 year old, and I have been never been notified of this policy until I just heard about it the other day. And personally, I think it's absolutely abhorrent that medical professionals will keep that kind of information for parents, especially if there's, like, you know, some kind of pregnancy or especially some kind of STI or anything like that, and and especially when it comes to gender. There's so many things that are poisoning our kids' minds on social media when it comes to gender ideology. And then medical professionals are now no longer required to disclose that kind of information to parents. I think it's absolutely important and disgusting. As a parent, if someone kept that kind of information from me, and know if you can tell, but I am shaking right now because I am furious that you would sit there and think that it's okay to hide that kind of information from a parent, A minor child. Because I'll tell you what, that is absolutely important to me. And if I ever find out that my child is going through these issues. I wasn't notified. I will go after every single person's medical license that had anything to do with my child because I will I would do anything to keep my children safe. So I think it's absolutely disgusting. Speaker 0: Thank you. Thank you for your opinion. That you prefer video. Just like you are an advocate for your child. I am an advocate for your child. And so when they come in and they disclose that information, sometimes I'm the 1st person that they have Oh, that has happened here in Bahrain. I'm the 1st person that they've given that information. And so then we have a discussion. I have that rapport with them. If open enough to tell me that information. And we talk about, hey, I really think you should talk to your parents. I I really think they would be able to help you. But then there are parents that don't wanna hear it. They're very close minded. And they don't wanna hear it. And that's why they keep those secrets. And that's why we have CRITS. And that's why we have TV suicides. Speaker 1: So you're saying that you're the Child the minor child, someone who can't consent to anything, who's not a legal adult, you're saying that minor child, They have and the medical, quote unquote, medical professional has more rights than the parent over that child. That's what that's the that's the navy's policy. Speaker 0: I would encourage you to talk to your child. Speaker 1: That's not what I asked you, ma'am. I'm asking you according to this policy. Speaker 0: Again, policy. I didn't make it. Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not accusing you, ma'am. I'm I'm simply calling up the Navy that the policy gives more rights or circumvents a parent's rights to know is what you're saying. That's the navy's official policy? Speaker 0: Yes. Alright. Any other questions?

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

This clip is one of the more infuriating parts of this. Navy Nurse Practitioner Nichole Benson seems to be saying that parents not being accepting of the trans agenda is the reason for suicides. This is the emotional manipulation used to get parents on board with transitions. She then admits that the @USNavy circumvents parental rights. This is beyond unacceptable. We demand answers and a policy change ASAP from the Navy. The government is actively engaged in grooming the children of our service members into Marxist ideologies.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the issue of parents who refuse to listen and keep secrets, leading to teenage suicides. They question the Navy's policy, which seems to prioritize the rights of minor children over their parents. The speaker asks for clarification on whether the policy circumvents a parent's right to know, to which the response confirms that it is indeed the Navy's official policy. The conversation ends with the speaker asking if there are any other questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Be able to help you. And but then there are parents that don't wanna hear it. They're very close in line. And they don't wanna hear and that's why they keep those secrets. And that's why we have teenage suicides. So you're saying that you're the child the minor child, Someone who can't consent to anything, who's not a legal adult, you're saying that minor child they have in the medical, quote unquote medical professional has more rights than the parent over that child. That's what that's the that's the navy's policy. I would encourage you to talk I talk to your child. That's not what I asked you, ma'am. I'm asking you according to this policy. Again, policy. I didn't make it. I'm not I'm not accusing you, ma'am. I'm I'm simply calling up the Navy that the policy gives more rights or circumvents a parent's rights to know is what you're saying. That's the Navy's official policy. Yes. Alright. Any other questions?

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

I’m currently investigating if this policy is one that the @DeptofDefense forced on all branches of the military. If you’re in the Army, Marines, Space Force, Air Force or National Guard: Ask about the Navy policy to see if your branch has the same policy. DM me if you record it.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Nichole Benson almost called in for a mental health day after January 6th and wonders if her white peers will walk out without her examining their child due to what I assume is her racist perception of white people.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Update for everyone following this story ⬇️ https://t.co/XfLFg6e7C3

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Major update to the story I broke about the @USNavy telling sailors they can’t access their kids medical records online if they’re 12 or older and that they discuss gender identity, sexual orientation and sex privately with service member’s kids. We all hoped this was one crazed…

Saved - May 26, 2023 at 7:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Three North Carolina medical schools are diagnosing toddlers who play with stereotypically opposite gender toys as having gender dysphoria and transitioning them. This radical gender theory is sexist, regressive, and homophobic. Let kids be kids and stop telling them they were born in the wrong body.

@againstgrmrs - Gays Against Groomers

BREAKING: Three medical schools in North Carolina are now diagnosing toddlers who play with stereotypically opposite gender toys as having gender dysphoria, and are transitioning them. Yes, you read that correctly. If a 2 year old girl picks up a truck instead a Barbie, that is…

@againstgrmrs - Gays Against Groomers

ARTICLE: https://www.edfirstnc.org/post/transgender-toddlers-treated-at-duke-unc-and-ecu

Transgender toddlers treated at Duke, UNC, and ECU Top medical schools in the state are now transitioning toddlers and training future primary care doctors on how to engage in the experimental treatment. Duke Medicine opened its Gender Clinic in 2015 to offer a wide variety of services under one roof. The clinic treats children as young as two for gender dysphoria. Dr. Deanna Adkins, a transgender activist who runs the clinic, said this about her toddler trans patients in an interview with the Charlotte Observer in 2016: “They are not old enoug edfirstnc.org

@againstgrmrs - Gays Against Groomers

Radical gender theory is genuinely the most sexist, regressive and homophobic ideology in the western world. How dare anyone tell young children — TODDLERS — that if they’re a girl and like playing with trucks, or a boy and they like playing with Barbie’s, that they were born in the wrong body?!? LET KIDS BE KIDS 🤬‼️

Saved - June 10, 2023 at 10:01 PM

@libbyemmons - Libby Emmons

Parents, get your kids out of California. New California bill aims to punish parents who refuse to 'affirm' their children's gender identity https://thepostmillennial.com/new-california-bill-aims-to-punish-parents-who-refuse-to-affirm-their-childrens-gender-identity?utm_campaign=64506

New California bill aims to punish parents who refuse to ‘affirm’ their children’s gender identity Bill AB957 will define a parent’s refusal to allow a minor to undergo sex change procedures as abuse. thepostmillennial.com
Saved - June 20, 2023 at 11:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The World Health Organization and United Nations have been accused of promoting a pedophilia agenda by instructing schools worldwide to sexualize children. Posters and books encourage homosexual activities and sexual games, while the UN's International Technical Guidance on Sexual Education aims to equip children to have sexual relationships. The Rutgers Foundation, funded by global organizations, operates in 27 nations and collaborates with the WHO. The Netherlands is at the forefront of this agenda, with Rutgers publishing a guide to train teachers to indoctrinate children about sex. This disturbing trend is further evidenced by the recent sentencing of former senior UN and WHO official, Dalglish, to nine years in prison for abusing children in Nepal. The WHO and UN, owned by financial elites, are accused of pushing a pedophilia agenda and controlling the worldwide health and educational system. Bill Gates, the main donor of the WHO, has close ties to Jeffrey Epstein, adding to the suspicion of the elites' involvement in organized child abuse. Former FBI director Ted Gunderson has confirmed the elites' involvement in organized child abuse. It is up to us to stand up and fight for the children. We must not allow the sexualization of children to become normalized and must hold those responsible accountable for their actions. It is our duty to protect the innocence of our children and ensure their safety.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

1) The World Health Organization and the United Nations have issued documents to all the nations of the world, instructing all schools worldwide to sexualize little children, as part of the agenda to normalize pedophilia. Thread-

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

2) The official statements are clear: they want the entire world to be transformed. Teaching 2 and 3 year olds to masturbate, and 9 year olds to use online pornography and have sex, is part of this agenda. The Biden administration has released statements supporting that.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

3) School posters are widely distributed that encourage children to engage in homosexual activities with their classmates, and books are recommended that tell kids all about oral sex. Children's books are promoted that tell stories about teachers having sex with their pupils.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

4) Schools are organizing sex games during which kids take the genitals of classmates in their mouth, or masturbate one another, as part of "comprehensive sexuality education" issued by the World health Organization and United Nations. The instruction given to teachers is that

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

5) all children should be encouraged to start with sex as soon as possible. Meanwhile judicial documents are issued worldwide to decriminalize sex between children and adults. The document Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe published by the World Health Organization

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

6) contains the following instructions for kindergartens and elementary schools: ✓ Children between 0 and 4 years must learn about masturbation and develop an interest in their own and others' bodies.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

7) ✓ Children between 4 and 6 years must learn about masturbation, and be encouraged to express their sexual needs and wishes. ✓ Children between 6 and 9 years must learn about sexual intercourse, online pornography, having a secret love and self-stimulation.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

8) ✓ Children between 9 and 12 years should have their first sexual experience, and learn to use online pornography. The following pages are from "Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe". Notice the age group in the top left corner.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

9) This video is part of a European school program that works closely with the WHO. It shows how little children are encouraged to start masturbating. This was spread to many thousands of schools, as part of the WHO "comprehensive sexuality education", which states that children

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

10) should start having sex as early as possible. The publisher of this video, the Rutgers Foundation, operates in 27 nations of the world and is a partner of the WHO. The plan is to implement this in curriculums worldwide.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

11) The next document is issued by the UN & is titled International Technical Guidance on Sexual Education. It is the official guideline for elementary schools around the world. The goal of this doc is described on page 16: it aims to equip children to have sexual relationships.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

12) On page 17 the United Nations explains that this guide is intended to help little children build relationships with romantic or sexual partners. On page 71 teachers are instructed to teach little kids from the age of 5 about kissing, hugging, touching and sexual behaviors.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

13) The logos on the United Nations International Technical Guidance on Sexual Education show that this is part of the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Agenda 2030 is a plan to transform every aspect of human existence on the earth by the year 2030.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

14) They make it clear that the transformation of human life will reach the entire world:  "As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge no one will be left behind. These are universal goals and targets which involve the entire world, developed & developing countries alike

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

15) The Biden administration has released statements that they will make sure this agenda is implemented throughout the USA as soon as possible, and no later than 2030.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

16) The Netherlands is at the heart of this worldwide agenda to sexualize little children. What happens there, will spread worldwide. This nation is the headquarters of a worldwide publisher of this "comprehensive sexuality education": the Rutgers Foundation.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

16) Rutgers operates in 27 nations and is funded by global organizations like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Planned Parenthood.  In the spring of 2023 a nationwide curriculum was launched with the name “Spring Fever”.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

17) A school poster was put up in thousands of elementary schools. I translated it to English, and added highlights to reveal the message of this school poster. Two boys hold hands and say, “Yes, we want it”. Two young girls find a “safe place” to have sex.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

18) The curriculum "Spring Fever" aggressively pushes the theme of homosexuality onto unsuspecting and vulnerable children. Below is a illustration from this school program for elementary schools. It is one thing if a person struggles with sexual identity, and is confused about

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

19) their preferences, but it is a whole different realm if sexual confusion is pushed into elementary schools, to drive children towards a homosexual lifestyle. Pushing little children towards homosexuality is directly instructed by the World Health Organization and UN.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

20) On page 40 of the “Standards for Sexuality Education” schools are told to teach four year olds about “same-sex relationships“ and on page 44 educators are instructed to teach nine year olds about “friendship and love towards people of the same sex”.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

21) One of the books recommended in elementary schools, is called "What is sex"? Here is a page, and a quote: "Blowjob is sex with the mouth. That is why it is called oral sex." "Have you ever given yourself a kiss on a soft spot of your body? Try it. How does that feel?"

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

22) "The skin of a dick or vagina is sensitive. Because of this, people sometimes like to touch each other there with their mouths. When someone suckles a dick, this is called sucking. Of course, a woman can do the same. If someone licks a vagina, this is called pussy eating."

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

23) Why would anyone want 4 to 8 year little children to know everything about oral sex?  Here is another page from this school program for elementary schools. This is for 10 year old kids:

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

24) "Examples of things you can do with sex are (tongue) kissing, caressing, petting (licking the vagina), piping (licking/sucking the penis), fingering, jerking off, dick-in-vagina sex (vaginal sex) and dick-in-anus sex (anal sex)".

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

25) When we have a deeper look into the program, we see a clear definition of the objective of the lessons: "Little children should know all about lust, physical excitement, and being intimate. They should know that everyone has sexual feelings and they should not be ashamed."

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

26) Being ashamed is a basic natural feeling that all children have, which protects them from being harmed through inappropriate experiences. Sexuality is the most sensitive, and vulnerable part of our humanity, which can traumatize us for life, if it is wrongly approached.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

27) Shame is an essential defense barrier to keep us safe. These programs aim to remove this natural barrier, so children will no longer listen to their instinct that tells them to protect their body. This makes them extremely vulnerable, and an easy prey for sexual predators.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

28) The following is an example of an official school curriculum in The Netherlands, published by the School Curriculum Education (School Leerplan Onderwijs) official publisher of all school curriculums. We can see that it is similar to the WHO Standards:

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

29) ✓ Toddlers in the age group of 0-4 must learn about falling in love, intimacy and sexual feelings. ✓ Little kids from the age of 5 should learn about sexual intercourse, online pornography and experiencing lust through touching their own body.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

30) Rutgers published a guide to train teachers how to indoctrinate little children about sex. In it they make several references to the WHO guide "Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe", further confirming how they are collaborating with the World Health Organization.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

31) A staff member of Rutgers contributed to the WHO guide. In this document Rutgers makes a clear statement what the purpose is of this type of education (see document below): "Sexual & relationship education gives children ideas that will help them to start with sex sooner."

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

32) The whole idea of this type of sexuality education is not to assist children during their natural development, towards a healthy and mature sexuality, but the goal is to indoctrinate them to start with sex as soon as possible.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

33) Several schools have been organizing sex games, where kids take the genitals of their class mates in their mouth, lick them, put their fingers in the vagina of girls, and so on. Below is a news report about sex games at an elementary school in The Netherlands.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

34) The sexualization of little children is also happening outside of the schools. These are images of children's playgrounds which were approved by local governments and schools.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

35) It also happens on a global corporate level, as with these mugs from MacDonalds in Japan, that - when turned in a certain angle - show children engaged in sexual acts.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

36) The execution of the WHO and UN guidelines in The Netherlands is done by Rutgers, an international organization active in 27 nations. The following information reveals how Rutgers has always been at the forefront of the pedophilia movement worldwide.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

37) Jan Rutgers (1850-1924) was a fierce opponent of marriage which he considered unnatural. He als passionately promoted the reduction of the human population, by pushing a culture of free sex into society. When Rutgers Foundation was founded in 1969, the main purpose was to

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

38) reduce population growth through sexual education, abortion & contraception. In 1999 Rutgers fused with the NISSO-group (Netherlands Institute for Social Sexological Research) whose goal was also to reduce birth rates by encouraging abortion, free sex, and sex education.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

39) In 2011 Rutgers fused again with the World Population Foundation who had the same mission of reducing the world population through abortion and sex education. Rutgers has always been heavily involved in the worldwide movement to normalize pedophilia. In 1946 the Netherlands

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

40) Association for Sexual Reform (NVSH) was founded, with once again the objective of reducing the human population. NVSH organized working groups on pedophilia that were supported by Labour Party Senator Dr. Edward Brongersma.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

41) This same Brongersma became the foreman of the pedophilia acceptance movement in the 1970s. Brongersma was known for abusing underaged sex slaves. In the 1960s Brongersma became a board member of the NVSH, where he again organized pedophilia working groups.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

42) They published the magazine NIKS (Dutch abbreviation of Towards Integration of Child Sexuality). In an online archive of this magazine, we can see the sickening profanity promoted: naked children on the cover exposing their genitals, children having sex, and so on.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

43) Another edition of the pedophilia magazine of Brongersma is titled the "anti-education episode" and contains an article that explains how "evil" the natural family is. The article is titled: "How do I kill my father and mother?" I quote:

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

44) "In the family, love is impossible. Parental love is a lie... The family limits, sours, mocks, discourages, mistreats, crumples..." The pedophilia magazine NIKS featured prominent international pedophiles like Theo Sandfort who wrote for several well known pedophilia

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

45) publications, like Paedo Alert News, and the British Paidika. In 1999 Rutgers published a report from this pedophile Sandfort. In the year 2000 another pedophile organization made headlines, for building an archive of child pornography.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

46) The founder, Frits Bernard, was an avid pedophile. Their articles of incorporation state that they collaborate with Rutgers. On June 22, 1979 Rutgers signed a petition, along with criminally convicted child molester Brongersma, for the legalizing of sex with children.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

47) The current chairman of the Supervisory Board of Rutgers is Andrée van Es, former politician of Green Left, and PSP, a party that also lobbied for the legalization of pedophilia. Former director of Rutgers, Pieter Wijnsma, stated in an interview that he had encouraged a

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

48) group of children to masturbate, because “the aspect of lust had to be developed”. De organization of pedophile Brongersma was succeeded by Fund for Scientific Research on Sexuality (FWOS). They state that Rutgers manages the vast child pornography collection of Brongersma.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

49) The International Planned Parenthood Foundation (an abortion organization founded by the father of Bill Gates) published a full blown pedophilia manifesto titled EXCLAIM! which was distributed within the United Nations.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

50) It repeatedly makes explicit statements typically used by pedophiles and child predators. It is literally filled with the hard core typical arguments used by pedophiles, claiming that babies, toddlers, children and teens have the "human right" to have sex.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

51) The pedophile practices of high ranking officials from the WHO and UN is usually carefully covered up, but once in a while one of them gets caught. This happened to Peter Dalglish, a senior official who held high positions within the United Nations, UNICEF and the

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

52) World Health Organization for over 30 years, and was founder of Street Kids International. He was awarded the Order of Canada for his outstanding humanitarian work. In 2015 he was the UN's 'country representative' in Kabul.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

53) In 2018 Dalglish was caught redhanded, while abusing two underaged boys in Nepal, and was sentenced to nine years in prison.  Dalglish lured children away from their parents with offers to educate them, take them abroad and provide them with jobs.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

54) Detectives say he abused children over a period of 15 years, while he was a senior official at the UN and WHO.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

55) The main entities pushing this pedophilia agenda worldwide are the World Health Organization and the United Nations. We must however remember that these are not governmental, but private organizations, owned by financial elites.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

56) As a private organization they have no authority over anybody whatsoever. Yet, they operate as a One World Government, controlling the worldwide health and educational system. The WHO does not serve the interest of humanity, but serves criminal agendas for concealed entities.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

57) The WHO suppressed cures for covid, and ordered social media companies to censor scientists and physicians who talked about effective treatments. They are the ones who told the world that only an experimental injection is the answer for the pandemic, which has resulted in

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

58) millions of deaths and thousands of people being permanently disabled as a result of these inoculations. The agenda to suppress every working treatment for covid, and tell the world that only an untested experimental injection will save us, was pushed by multi-billionaire

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

59) and public mouth piece for the financial elites, Bill Gates. He is the world’s #1 vaccine dealer, who made astronomical amounts of money from this worldwide inoculation plot.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

60) When we understand that Gates is the main donor of the WHO, we also know that he has full authority over their policies.  Bill Gates is known for his close relations with Jeffrey Epstein, who hosted sex parties with children for the elites on his notorious Epstein Island.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

61) He was arrested in 2018 under the Trump administration, and reportedly hung himself in his prison cell. The name of Bill Gates appears several times on the flight logs to Epstein Island.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

62) Why do governments and financial elites insist on sexualizing little children in every nation of the world? The answer is given in all our evidence that details how most of the elites all have one thing in common: they are heavily involved in organized abuse of children.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

63) This is confirmed by former FBI director Ted Gunderson, as well as former members of the military, marechaussee, gendarmerie, police and detectives. The danger with these organizations is that they have mastered the skill to hypnotize humanity with their word plays,

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

64) that make grooming little children for pedophile predators sound like a wonderful thing, that we must support wholeheartedly. They are word wizards that put spells on the mind of people, who lack the sharpness of spirit to discern this trickery.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

65) That's why so many unsuspecting people go along with it. We all have the choice to close our eyes, and become complicit through our silence, or be brave people who stand up, and expose this to humanity.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

66) The children cannot defend themselves against these monsters. If we don't fight for them, nobody will, and this cruel horror wil only increase worldwide. #MAGA The end.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

@threadreaderapp unroll

Saved - June 29, 2023 at 12:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
As a medical professional, I initially aimed to combat diseases like cancer and schizophrenia. However, I've come to realize that my greatest challenge lies in combating dangerous ideologies. These beliefs deny the biological reality of gender, leading to risky medical interventions on children. Such ideas mock scientific progress and cause immense harm to young individuals and their families. I've witnessed heart-wrenching stories of children being taken away and put on hormone treatments against their will. There are also cases of individuals regretting irreversible procedures and women experiencing premature menopause due to reproductive organ removal. These atrocities are happening, and it's crucial to protect our loved ones from becoming victims.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

🧵 1/ When I graduated from medical school, I took an oath. I stood up, raised my right hand, and vowed to prevent disease whenever I could. At the time, I expected to go to war against cancer and schizophrenia.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

2/ But after forty years, I’ve realized my most challenging fight is not against deadly diseases, but deadly ideas.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

3/ The beliefs that man and woman are human inventions; that the sex of a healthy newborn is arbitrarily and often incorrectly “assigned”; and that as a result the child requires “affirmation” through risky medical interventions

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

4/ -- these ideas are divorced from reality and therefore hazardous, especially to children. They are, in fact, a mockery of 21st century science, and cause immeasurable harm to young people and their families. I know, because I’m a psychiatrist and they’re my patients.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

5/ I don’t have the words to describe the sorrow of parents I know whose young daughter was removed by a government agency, placed in foster care, and started on testosterone. Their crime? Insisting she’s a girl.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

6/ Or the anguish of a young man I see, who sought castration to become his “authentic self” and now, after the fact, regrets it. Or the rage of a twenty-something woman going through menopause due to “gender affirming” removal of her reproductive organs.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

7/ Are these atrocities really happening in our country? They sure are, and you must protect your loved ones from joining the multitude of victims.

Saved - July 7, 2023 at 2:32 PM

@CourageHabit - Courage Is A Habit

Comprehensive Sex Education (CSE) in K-12 is a vehicle to push obscenities to young children, to sexualize them early, and condition them to be vulnerable to sexual exploitation; all disguised as Sex Education. Today’s example comes by way of @JeffreyInsko, however…

Saved - August 18, 2023 at 8:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
America First Legal has filed a lawsuit against Governor Inslee of Washington to block a new bill that allows the state to hide kids seeking gender transitions from their parents. The law removes the requirement of parental notice, potentially exposing minors to disfiguring drugs and mutilating surgeries without parental consent. This violates parents' constitutional rights to direct their children's care. We stand against the dangerous gender-affirming care agenda that puts minors at risk.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — we sued the governor of Washington @GovInslee to block enforcement of a new “state-sanctioned kidnapping” bill that allows the state to hide kids from their parents to perform “gender transitions” - including disfiguring drugs and mutilating surgeries. Read more:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 With our co-counsel Schaerr Jaffe LLP, and Joel Ard, we sued the: ✔️Governor of Washington, Jay Inslee ✔️Attorney General of Washington, Robert Furguson ✔️Secretary of the Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Ross Hunter

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 The recently signed legislation creates a dangerous incentive for minors who disagree with their parents on “gender-affirming care” to run away to a shelter or host home. The new law takes away a requirement of notice to parents. Read about it in our complaint:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 The law authorizes the state to refer a minor for “behavioral health services” without defining what this entails.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 In practice, this means that young children who run away from home could be receiving chemical sterilization drugs or even genital mutilation without the consent or knowledge of the parents.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 This new statute deprives certain parents of their fundamental rights under the United States Constitution to direct the care and upbringing of their children.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 America First Legal is proud to defend parental rights and stand up against the insidious “gender-affirming care” agenda, which promotes using experimental medical procedures and drugs on minor children – potentially altering their lives forever. https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-sues-washington-governor-to-block-state-sanctioned-kidnapping-bill-that-allows-state-to-hide-kids-seeking-gender-transition-from-parents/

America First Legal Sues Washington Governor to Block “State-Sanctioned Kidnapping” Bill That Allows State to Hide Kids Seeking “Gender Transition” From Parents WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, on behalf of our clients, America First Legal (AFL), Schaerr Jaffe LLP, and Joel Ard, sued the Governor of Washington, Jay Inslee, the Attorney General of Washington, Robert Furguson, and the Secretary of the Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Ross Hunter to stop the enforcement of Senate Bill 5599 […] aflegal.org
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 3:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
California has passed four bills that remove children from their homes, allowing adults to discuss their gender confusion, stress, and anxiety without parental knowledge. Privacy is gone, and parents are not notified. The Attorney General's lawsuit against a school district will likely fail. Children must vote for this policy.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This Is HORRIFYING CALIFORNIA “In the last 24 hours, the California legislature has passed not one, not two, but four bills that are designed to remove children from their homes and into government systems where adults can have private conversations with them. And everyone, and I mean everyone from the school bus driver to the cafeteria lady will have knowledge about that child's gender confusion, about their stress or anxiety, their depression, except parents. The children are out. There is no more privacy. This is not an outing policy. This is a parental notification policy. At the same time, we have the Attorney General Rob Bonta waging an unsubstantiated war, a lawsuit against Chino Valley Unified School District that will fail. The TRO that was issued just the other day is simply that. It is a temporary order to maintain the status quo until a final decision is reached, and that decision will be the policy's legal, constitutional, and necessary to protect. Children, do the right thing, vote this policy in. Thank you.“

Video Transcript AI Summary
The California legislature has passed four bills aimed at removing children from their homes and placing them in government systems, where everyone except parents will have knowledge about their personal struggles. This policy is about parental notification, not outing. Meanwhile, the attorney general is suing Chino Valley Unified School District, but the temporary order issued recently is just to maintain the current situation until a final decision is made. This decision will determine if the policies are legal, constitutional, and necessary for protecting children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Courage is contagious. In the last 24 hours, the California legislature has passed not 1, not 2, but 4 bills that are designed to remove children from their homes and into government systems where adults can have private conversations with them and everyone. And I mean, everyone from the school bus driver to the cafeteria lady will have knowledge about that child's gender confusion about their stress or anxiety, their depression, except parents. The children are out. There is no more privacy. This is not an outing policy. This is a parental notification policy. At the same time, we have the attorney general Rob Bonta, waging an unsubstantiated war, a lawsuit against Chino Valley Unified School District that will fail. The t r o that was issued just the other day is simply that. It is a temporary order to maintain the status quo until a final decision is re reached And that decision will be the policy's legal, constitutional and necessary to protect children.
Saved - October 6, 2023 at 1:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Director of Education for HiTops, an LGBTQ+ nonprofit, emphasizes the importance of introducing queer theory and gender ideology in grades 5-8, during the early stages of puberty. She shares a rewarding experience where five students came out after her visit to an elementary school. This raises concerns about the influence on children.

@againstgrmrs - Gays Against Groomers

This is the most disturbing video you will see all day. Director of education for HiTops, an LGBTQ+ nonprofit focused on bringing queer theory and gender ideology into schools, says that the most critical time to get in the classroom are grades 5-8, to “catch kids when they’re starting puberty.” She goes onto say the the most rewarding experience for her was after going into an elementary school, 5 of students went to the principal’s office and “came out.” This is simply demonic. But they’re not coming for your kids, right?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The most critical time to intervene is in grades 5 through 8, as kids are starting puberty and forming their identities. However, early intervention is important, so we're also developing a curriculum for kindergarten through grade 2. We recently visited an elementary school and worked with students in grades 3, 4, and 5. After our visit, five students went to the principal's office and came out. This experience has motivated us to reach even younger grades.
Full Transcript
The most critical time to be there is grades 5 through 8 because you want to catch kids when they're starting puberty because that's the time in which identity formation is central to their lives. However, early intervention is key. So we actually are designing a kindergarten through grade 2 curriculum this summer. And I will tell you, one of the most rewarding experiences, Nikki, we were in a local school system in an elementary school and we were in grades 3, 4, and 5. And after we were there, five students went to the principal's office and came out. So we are really intentionally going into younger and younger grades.
Saved - October 13, 2023 at 6:52 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

This is in the required curriculum for 4th graders in Superior School District, WI. They’re teaching 9-year-olds that doctors “assign” a sex at birth but they could be wrong because you can be trans.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if a baby is a boy or a girl. Speaker 1 explains that a baby's sex is determined by their body parts at birth. However, gender is how someone feels inside and may not always match their sex. Speaker 1 gives an example of someone born with a penis who identifies as a boy, and someone born with a penis who identifies as a girl. Speaker 0 asks if gender means liking certain things, to which Speaker 1 responds that toys and clothes are for everyone, regardless of gender. Speaker 0 shares that they have been told what they can and cannot play with based on their gender, but Speaker 1 reassures them that they can choose what feels right for them. The video ends with Speaker 1 saying goodbye.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, baby. Are you a boy or a girl? Speaker 1: Funny you should ask, Sid. One of the first things they check when a new baby is born is what kind of body parts they have. They do that to determine a baby's sex. Ask. Most of the time, it's easy to determine. And sometimes, it's more complicated. This one has a penis. It's a boy. Ask. This one has a vulva. It's a girl. Congratulations. Woah. Let's hit the brakes, ask people. The way your body looks on the outside is only part of the story. What? Ask Stay with me, gang. This is important. Hi, little one. Your sex refers to your physical body parts, remember? But there is also something called gender, which is how you feel inside your body and who you know yourself to be. Add. And your gender, how you feel on the inside, doesn't always match the sex you recalled when you were born. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Let's say you were born with a penis and you feel like a boy inside. In that case, your sex and your gender match. But what Speaker 0: if you were born with a penis ask. And you know you're a girl inside, not a boy. Speaker 1: Then your sex and your gender don't match. Speaker 0: Wait. What does know you're a girl outside. I mean, anyway, does that mean you have to love pink things and princesses? Speaker 1: Nope. Sometimes people refer to things as girl things and boy things, but this is just how people sometimes classify things, usually to make it easier to sell stuff to kids and their parents. Clothes, toys, and games are for everyone. Ask. You don't have to be a boy or a girl to like a certain thing. Sid, has anyone ever told you that you shouldn't play with something or wear something because you're a boy? Act Well, yes. The body parts you were born with don't always dictate who you are, how you feel, or what you like Speaker 0: have to play with. That's such a relief. Speaker 1: Gender, how you feel and who you know yourself to be, tells you who ask Are. And there are a whole bunch of possibilities. Figuring out what feels right for you is just part of growing up. Bye, little cutie. Speaker 0: Ask.
Saved - January 12, 2024 at 9:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A lawsuit has been filed against the Pine-Richland School District in PA for hiding students' "gender transitions" from parents and providing a secret taxpayer-funded "gender transition team." The school district requires using preferred pronouns, names, and allowing students to choose bathrooms and sports teams. They believe notifying parents about gender identity or transition may be unnecessary. The lawsuit aims to hold the school district accountable for keeping parents uninformed about their children's gender transitions. Parents should have control over their child's upbringing, especially regarding gender indoctrination.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — We filed a lawsuit against the Pine-Richland School District in PA for hiding “gender transitions” of students from parents and providing students with a secret taxpayer-funded “gender transition team” made up of gov’t officials and psychologists. THREAD:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 The school district brazenly requires that schools: -Address the student by his or her preferred pronouns: -Use the student’s preferred name, gender, and pronouns on “school records or documents, such as school IDs, classroom rosters or the year-book;” -Permit the student to use whatever bathroom that the student chooses; and -To participate on the sports team corresponding with the student’s chosen gender.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 Further, the School District believes that “notifying a student’s parent/guardian about his or her gender identity or transition may be unnecessary.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 AFL’s client sent written notice to the School District that, absent her prior written consent, the School District shall not refer her child to any mental health counselor or social worker for evaluation and that the School District notify her of any matters related to the “gender identity” or “gender dysphoria” expressed by her child.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 Upon meeting with the principal of her child’s school as well as the guidance counselor, they told her that under no circumstances would the School District notify her if it becomes aware that her child has requested to be addressed by different pronouns, a different name, or other exhibited behavior consistent with gender dysphoria or a desire to transition to a gender other than her biological gender.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 America First Legal has swiftly filed a lawsuit against the school district for illegally keeping parents in the dark regarding the social contagion of “gender transitions” of their children.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 Parents, not school bureaucrats, should have the utmost control over their child’s upbringing – especially when it comes to indoctrination schemes regarding gender. https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-sues-pennsylvania-school-district-for-hiding-radical-life-altering-gender-transitions-from-parents/

America First Legal Sues Pennsylvania School District for Hiding Radical Life Altering “Gender Transitions” from Parents WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, America First Legal (AFL) filed a lawsuit against the Pine-Richland School District in Pennsylvania for hiding “gender transitions” of students from their parents and providing students with a secret taxpayer-funded “gender transition team” made up of government officials and psychologists, who will assist  students in developing a plan to transition their […] aflegal.org
Saved - January 25, 2024 at 2:32 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

New Wisconsin s*x ed curriculum teaches 5th graders about puberty blockers. They teach that a kid can be transgender and they can take puberty blockers to stop puberty. They’re after your kids. Credit: @scarlett4kids https://t.co/rT0y7YgTbL

Saved - April 17, 2024 at 2:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The injection of radical gender ideology into institutions like CPS in Indiana is seen as a dangerous move by the original author. They believe that this ideology is being spread widely to gain power and target children. The author calls for action to prevent further harm to innocent families.

@ChayaRaichik10 - Chaya Raichik

In case you thought I was exaggerating… this happened in Indiana. Embedding radical gender ideology into institutions like CPS is extremely dangerous. They’re injecting it everywhere so they can use their positions of power in the gov to go after your kids. This needs to be stopped before it can cause more harm to innocent families.

Saved - March 30, 2024 at 3:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Gender identity ideologies, originating from the Babylonian Talmud, are being promoted with pseudoscience. Advocates seek to redefine traditional family structures and give the state more control over children. Making life-changing decisions about body alterations for children is questioned, as it may lead to regret. Society is to blame for propagating this evil and hindering children's mental growth. Efforts to reshape future generations are well-planned. While some medical or psychological conditions warrant treatment, the majority should not be raised thinking they have such pathologies. This non-scientific ideology does not belong in the scientific world.

@Malcolm_XY_ - S.C

For all progressives inclined to look down upon conservatives, it's important to recognize that gender identity ideologies are ancient prehistoric ideologies, originating from the Babylonian Talmud written by Babylonian sages. The current emphasis on gender identity, which is relentlessly promoted in the mainstream is supported by pseudoscience. Those advocating these ideas are the same individuals pushing to redefine the traditional family structure and remove parental authority while giving the state more control over your children. If your child wants to be a pirate, would you remove an eye and a limb to fulfill your child's desire? A child is not emancipated enough to receive Tylenol from the pediatrician, but suddenly that same child has enough insight to make life-changing decisions about body alterations? What sort of evil is this? In the storm of ever-evolving human emotions, why assign permanency to a certain emotion? Ask those who have been encouraged by the system to undertake irreversible body-altering surgeries, only to look back in regret years later. The blame lies on the society as a whole which propagated such evil to those young souls who did not have the capacity to know better. Nefarious forces are at play, molding the reality. Children are increasingly exposed to such confusion from a young age without parental consent, which hinders their mental growth. This manipulation of reality leads astray from innate nature. These efforts towards "modernity" are well-planned efforts toward reshaping future generations. That being said, there is a very small percentage of the population that may have birth defects, genetic anomalies such as Turner Syndrome, Klinefelter Syndrome, etc, hormonal anomalies related to Adrenal Hyperplasias, etc, or psychological conditions such as gender dysphoria, Body dysmorphic disorder, etc. All of these warrant either medical or psychological treatment. Those lacking such pathologies should not be raised thinking that they do. This prehistoric non-scientific ideology from the Babylonian Talmud written by sages does not belong in the scientific world. Those controlling the mainstream are forcing humanity back into the dark ages under the guise of "progression".

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the influence of Zionism on the transgender movement, highlighting concerns about curriculum in schools promoting gender fluidity. Parents face legal battles for questioning education content. Drag queen story time and gender transition issues are also addressed, with accusations of child abuse. The speakers warn of a Luciferian agenda and emphasize the importance of parental rights. Overall, the video raises alarm about societal changes impacting children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is Zionism behind the transgender movement? Speaker 1: Yes. It gets its origin in Zionism, and it gets its origin in the Talmud, Zohar, and Kabbalah. It's a Kabbalistic doctrine of Adam Kadmon, which Adam Kadmon of, originally was according to Zohar and Talmud, he was andragynous or he was male, female in one body, and this is why you see this transgender agenda today. And there are laws, very serious laws passing in Alberta, Canada. Speaker 2: The largest teachers union in the country, the NEA, did file a lawsuit against me to bully me and harass me with frivolous litigation and to send a message to other parents that if you ask questions about public education, they will come after you. Speaker 3: A family can be made up in many different ways. Speaker 4: It's called SOGI, for sexual orientation and gender identification. Lessons include books about transgender children, such as 10,000 dresses, and songs like the rainbow song. Speaker 3: Gender won't decide the choices we make. Some boys like dressing up. Some girls like catching snake. Speaker 2: My name is Nicole Solis, and I am a mother from Rhode Island who was sued by the teachers union simply because I wanted to know what my kindergartner would be learning in school. Speaker 4: A curriculum that teaches public school students to celebrate the homosexual lifestyle and that gender is fluid. In other words, your gender is not dependent on what parts you were born with, but rather what you feel like in the moment. Speaker 5: There's people that are boys. There's people that are girls. There are peep there are people whose gender might be a little bit of both or might even be neither. Speaker 6: I just thought, who decided that this was okay to teach our children? Hello? Speaker 7: Your girl shoes on. Kinda look like Tinker Bell. Speaker 8: Bam. Wonderful. Do you like what I'm wearing today? Speaker 7: Why do you have makeup and and lick it and put it on? Speaker 8: Because I think it looks pretty. What do you think about men who wear makeup? Speaker 9: You can't Speaker 7: put it into boy. Speaker 0: Who said? Speaker 10: You don't think it looks pretty? Speaker 7: Do you have a girlfriend? Speaker 8: I think it might be a boyfriend. Speaker 6: Boyfriend. And we are seeing the results of that now because some kids are reacting very emotionally and saying, you know, and they're in fear. Will I be, you know, will I suddenly struggle with feeling like a different gender inside of my body? Speaker 4: Carrie Simpson of CultureGuard, another leading opponent, calls the curriculum nothing short of child abuse. Speaker 11: All those beautiful qualities that make young girls, beautiful girls and women, are being basically vilified. The things that make our boys boys are being, you know, taken from them. So things of equating young men to being strong protectors is something that's now evil. Speaker 2: I asked to see the curriculum, and my school told me I had to submit a public records request. The curriculum wasn't posted online, and it wasn't available in a school district. Then I asked them if they were teaching gender theory, and they told me that they don't call children boys and girls, and they embed the values of gender identity into every classroom, including kindergarten, and they didn't want to answer any of my questions further. They told me that they would communicate with me only through public records requests, and that is the only way I could get my questions answered. And when I did submit the public records request that they told me to submit, and I submitted 100 because I had 100 of questions, My school board then put my name on the agenda of a public school board meeting and held a public school board meeting to discuss suing me for submitting the request that they told me to submit. Speaker 11: Altering our culture from a heteronormative society into one where anything goes. No boundaries, no values, no morals. It's a hedonistic, cult, basically, what they're implying. Speaker 4: Another blaring example, drag queen story time. It's happening in Canada and America, where some public schools and libraries invite drag queens, some dress like torn demons to read to young children. Speaker 11: And it's a social deconstructionist agenda. They're using children, little 5 year olds, to accomplish this, and parents are waking up and saying no. Speaker 12: Does anyone know what a drag performer is? What a drag queen is? Drag is all about joy, self expression, and love. So anyone can do drag as long as you bring that to the forefront. Speaker 13: You know how Halloween soon and everyone has a fun costume, right? Speaker 14: So it's like wearing a costume that you feel really good in. Speaker 12: Yeah. Forever. Speaker 9: Malbecome the dragon goes blah blah blah blah blah. Parents' rights are limited, And children's rights are put ahead. So the child has the right to be protected from the parents when the parents behave badly. Speaker 2: In a 5 hour long school board meeting, they openly debated my moral character, my political motivations. They said that I was causing chaos, wreaking havoc, harming the district, harming children. One school board member even said she felt unsafe and started to cry because as you see, I'm really scary standing here right now. And they really just tarred and feathered me for asking questions. And they had never met me before, and this was the first school board meeting that I had ever been to in my life. They wanted to send a message to other parents that if you ask questions, they will come after you. Speaker 4: Dave Davy DeCarlo support SOGI in limiting parental rights. Speaker 9: The change that we have to see is sometimes the parents, and the kids are doing actually really okay. Speaker 0: This is very scary stuff. Speaker 4: Long time Vancouver area pastor Kevin Kavanaugh says this is far more serious than most Canadian Christians realize. Speaker 0: Our problem is not the teachers, the educators, the administrators. This is a battle in the heavenlies. Speaker 4: He says Satan is going after their most vulnerable, the children. Speaker 1: They have this doctrine called tikkun olam, repairing the world. So how do they want to repair the world? They wanna bring it to the original. Who was original Adam? He was androgynous. So now they're putting specific things in food and drink and they're basically their end game is to make humans that on earth that will survive whatever it is they're bringing, androgynous. Speaker 0: Oh, mom. Thank you for being here. I appreciate it. I'm hurt bad. And the little little girl came home in tears because the teacher had told her since she was playing with some toys in the class that were deemed to be masculine in nature that she was likely a boy in a girl's body. The mother went to the school the very next day, and instead of having any sort of tolerance or support or understanding, she was actually called names. She was told that she was a homophobe, that she was a bigot. Speaker 15: Canadian police arrested a father last week for violating a Speaker 8: court order that banned him from speaking out about his daughter's gender transition. Speaker 10: Perhaps most disturbing in all of this, the school counselor had changed the child's name without even telling the father, and the school socially transitioned the biologically female child on its own initiative. She was seeing a school counselor. Now during those counseling sessions, that's when, the father later learned, that the child had been shown, these videos that he said amounted to nothing more than, gender, propaganda videos. And so it was through the watching of these videos and the guidance of the school counselors and the gender ideologues, that they sort of push this, according to the father, on the child, and that's what sort of led, to to this desire to transition. These are irreversible decisions. He said she can never go back to being a girl in the healthy body that she should have had. She's going to forever have a lower voice. She'll forever have to shave because of facial hair. She won't be able to have children. The father has accused the government of, quote, state sponsored child abuse. Speaker 2: And I'm here so that this doesn't happen to any other parent in America. I'm still in litigation for almost 2 years with the teachers union. I still don't have my answers. But what I do know is that my school district and my teachers union didn't want to just hide the curriculum from me. They wanted to ruin my life just for asking for it, And I don't want that to happen to any other parent in America. Speaker 1: Now they are building their own kingdom. It's the Jewish earthly kingdom with headquarters in Jerusalem where their AI messiah will be, and they're going to rule the world through the, through the law. You know, it will be international, one law, one religion basically, Luciferian religion. So, yes, in a Talmud, this is the Jewish earthly kingdom, and this is why, the Zionist Christianity have embraced chiliism. And this is how Jews and Christians are getting together and Christians are so deceived thinking that they are working for the good thing for the Jews, like they're helping the Jews. The Jews are supposed to get this kingdom. Yet this is, Zoharic doctrine and it does not have good intention. They want to rule the gentiles. They don't consider gentiles fully human beings. Speaker 3: They 6 sexes genders in the town, but with many mentions. Let's get into what they are. There's a keva and zakar. The 2 here as female and male drug dealers for an intersex person with both female male sex characteristics. Known to a person with up obscure or unclear sexual characteristics. You'll need someone assigned female at birth, but you'll express a male characteristics later in life. Sorry. Someone assigned male at birth. Doctor. Indulging of characteristics later in life and or has their sexual organs removed. Sarees and alony often are described as infertile. And while life has lots of rules, don't let fine
Saved - April 17, 2024 at 2:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There are two posts discussing the controversial topic of gender identity. The first post argues that there are only two sexes, male and female, and criticizes the concept of gender identity, attributing its creation to John Money, a convicted pedophile. The second post provides disturbing details about Money's unethical experiments on twin boys. Another post raises concerns about a convicted child sex offender working at a bar hosting drag shows for kids in Indiana. The fourth post highlights how Money preyed on desperate parents, offering them false hope for their child's gender reassignment. The fifth post references Oprah's coverage of the story of David Reimer, who was a victim of Money's experiment and later committed suicide. The final post expresses concern about the injection of radical gender ideology into institutions like CPS in Indiana.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Chaya Raichik asked how many genders there are: "There's zero genders. There's two sexes. Male and female." Based. Raichik then stuns the rabid leftists in the crowd by educating the class on the creator of 'Gender Identity' John Money: "Gender identity was made up by a pedophile named John Money. He did these horrific experiments on these twin boys. He made them do sexual stuff with each other. His experiment resulted in both of them committing suicide. But that didn't stop the radical gender ideologues from taking his failed experiment and instituting it into the mainstream, and into every single aspect of our culture." Chaya then notes that the University of Indiana - where she is speaking - has a 'John Money collection' that houses John Money's lifelong work. Raichik went into enemy territory, as they're cackling like hyenas at her, and this answer stunned them into silence. A masterclass of how to handle the woke mob.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 2 genders, male and female. A psychologist's experiment of raising a boy as a girl failed tragically, leading to both subjects committing suicide. Despite the failure, radical gender ideology adopted the experiment into mainstream culture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the rainbow bull is right here. Could you define or could you could you give us could you say how many genders are there, Charya, please? There's 0 genders. There's 2 that's added. There's male and female. Psychologist. And he said, oh, your son had a boss circumcision. Let's just raise another girl. Don't tell him he's a boy, and we'll see what happens. His experiment he he was a pedophile. He made them do sexual stuff on each other. You can look it up. It's absolutely grotesque. It's horrific. It's disgusting. His his experiment resulted in both of them committing suicide. So his experiment was a total and epic fail. But that didn't stop the radical gender ideology from taking his failed experiment and instituting that into the mainstream and into every single aspect of our culture, which doesn't make any sense.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

"According to John Colapinto's biography of David Reimer, starting when Reimer and his twin Brian were six years old, Money showed the brothers pornography and forced the two to rehearse sexual acts. Money would order David to get down on all fours and Brian was forced to "come up behind [him] and place his crotch against [his] buttocks". Money also forced Reimer, in another sexual position, to have his "legs spread" with Brian on top. On "at least one occasion" Money took a photograph of the two children performing these acts."

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Meanwhile in Indiana: https://t.co/9AQMkFe0Jd

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Hi @FBIIndianapolis, there’s a convicted child s*x offender who was charged with child p*rn and is now working at a bar which hosts drag shows for KIDS in South Bend, Indiana. He claims to still have urges as recently as 12 months ago. If you live in South Bend, BEWARE!! This is so creepy and terrifying.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

John Money preyed upon parents who were desperate for anyone to help their children. "He explained to Ron and Janet [The Reimer parents] that their baby could be given a perfectly functional vagina - adequate for sexual intercourse and for sexual pleasure, including orgasm. He also explained to them that although their child would not, if changed into a girl, be able to bear children, she would develop psychologically as a woman and would find her erotic attraction to men." From the Reimer biography by Colapinto

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Oprah featuring the story of David Reimer 4 years before he committed suicide: https://t.co/qVFLorV6lZ

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Oprah featured the story of David Reimer (Born Bruce Peter Reimer) who was castrated as a result of John Money's unethical sexual reassignment experiment. "They told me that if we did not disclose the fact that he had ever been a boy, and we raised him to be a girl, that there was no reason that it wouldn't be successful." The reason it wasn't successful: Biology. "I put it [a dress] on her, she started to tear it off. And I thought 'Oh my God' she knows she's a boy, and she doesn't want to wear a dress." "Brenda went to the bathroom standing up, like a boy" Bruce committed suicide 4 years after the Oprah broadcast. John Money reported this experiment as a success. Do you still trust the science?

Video Transcript AI Summary
At Johns Hopkins Hospital, a child underwent sexual reassignment at 22 months old, becoming Brenda Lee. Despite efforts to raise her as a girl, Brenda struggled with her identity, rejecting feminine traits. Bullied at school, Brenda faced isolation and violence. Reluctantly taking female hormones, she resisted surgery. At age 13, Brenda was told the truth and transitioned back to David. Despite forgiveness from family, self-acceptance remained a challenge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They agreed to a radical treatment known as sexual reassignment at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Speaker 1: The doctors at Johns Hopkins were very hopeful that if we had made a move towards making our Bruce into a girl, she could be successfully raised as a girl, and she would enjoy a more normal life than as she remained a boy. Speaker 0: At 22 months old, little Bruce was castrated. His new name was Brenda Lee. Speaker 1: They told me that, if we did not disclose the fact that he had ever been a boy and we raised him to be a girl, but there was no reason that it wouldn't be successful. Speaker 0: But there were early warning signs of problems to come. Janet remembers the first time she put a dress on Brenda. Speaker 1: And I put it on her, and she started to tear it off. And I thought, oh my god. She knows she's a boy, and she doesn't wanna wear a dress. Speaker 0: Brenda's feelings only grew stronger. She rebelled against anything feminine. Speaker 1: Brenda went to the bathroom standing up like a boy. Speaker 0: Early on, her twin brother noticed things were not right. Speaker 2: I've noticed, at a very early age, I would say kindergarten, where all the little girls would be, you know, playing with their hair and and playing with Barbie dolls and things like that. And Brenda had didn't want any part of that. She wanted to play with the boys. Speaker 0: Brenda's female appearance combined with her masculine behavior made her a social outcast in school. Speaker 2: She was not allowed in the girls' bathroom because the other girls, pulled knives out when they were gonna stab her. She couldn't go in the boys' room for obvious reasons, so she had to go outside and and go to the bathroom in between the schools in the parking lot. Speaker 0: Brenda reluctantly took the female hormones prescribed to give her a feminine figure. She fought the transformation all the way never knowing why. Speaker 1: She knew she wasn't a girl, but she was told she wasn't a boy. So she was confused. She thought she was an it. Speaker 0: At age 13, doctors felt Brenda was now ready for a special surgery that would give her a vagina. Speaker 1: She rebelled. She ran. She ran on top of the roof of the building. She said if she had to go see the doctor again, she would commit suicide. And that was the last trip. Speaker 0: No longer able to live with this secret, the Reimers told Brenda the truth. Speaker 3: When we told Brenda, we asked her forgiveness, and she graciously gave it to us. Speaker 0: Brenda changed her name to David and began the life nature had intended as a 14 year old boy. Speaker 3: God has given her a very loving, forgiving heart. But it's another thing to forgive yourself.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

https://t.co/hNOEParSYz

@ChayaRaichik10 - Chaya Raichik

In case you thought I was exaggerating… this happened in Indiana. Embedding radical gender ideology into institutions like CPS is extremely dangerous. They’re injecting it everywhere so they can use their positions of power in the gov to go after your kids. This needs to be stopped before it can cause more harm to innocent families.

Saved - June 16, 2024 at 3:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author, a former radical feminist and liberal, explains why she left the Democratic party. She became disillusioned with high taxes and wasteful government spending, particularly in California's homeless crisis. She also criticizes the government's involvement in schools, pushing sexuality into the curriculum and hiding medical treatments from parents. The author encourages people to vote for what they believe in, as she no longer supports the Democratic party.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Latina Influencer Tells Her 200k+ Followers Why She Left The Democrat Party “I used to be a radical feminist slash liberal and to this day it's been the most embarrassing phase of my life like it still makes me cringe. People always ask me, hey, Shelley. What made you walk away from the Democratic party / liberalism? And it wasn't one big, like, wake up call for me. Uh, it was a process: It started when I first started paying taxes. I remember working 60 to 70 hour weeks only to get 30 to 40% of my paycheck cut from me. Realistically speaking, that's out of those 60 hours, I worked 20 of those for somebody else. And then my hate for Democrats got a lot worse when I started looking into government spending and I realized how they spent our money. For example, did you know that over the last 5 years, California spent over $20 billion on the homeless crisis. Now if you live in LA, you're wondering, hey. Where does that money go? Because it's only gotten worse. Right? It hasn't gotten any better. When you ask the government, they can't tell you how those $20 billion were spent. They don't know where they went. They can't even tell you if those $20 billion were effective because they're incapable of balancing a budget instead of reining in their spending. Do you know what they're doing? They're increasing taxes on the average American, meaning that more of the hours you work aren't gonna be for you or your family, they're gonna be for someone else. And you know who's getting screwed the most? Middle class hardworking Americans. And that's the tip of the iceberg. That's just a financial side, and it does get worse. When when it comes to what Democrats how they're trying to groom children in schools, it's disturbing. Doesn't matter to me if you're gay, straight, or a fucking unicorn. I don't think the government should be involved in your everyday life or who you're attracted to at all. But there's absolutely no reason why the government should be trying to force sexuality into the curriculum and exposing young children and minors to sexuality at such a young age when it can actually harm their development. There's absolutely no reason that the government and the school system should be transitioning a young minor, encouraging them to get surgeries, encouraging to get medical treatments that they can't take back without the consent or knowledge from the parents. Actually, they help hide this from the parents. When I was a kid, when an adult said, hey, don't tell your parents, that was a giant red flag. Why are we just glossing it over now and acting like all of this is okay? California everyday tries to pass more laws to try and take away parental rights from their children. And don't take this as me saying, hey, go be a Republican. I'm saying, hey, go vote for what you believe in because I don't believe in anything that the democratic party stands for anymore. It's wrong. It's disturbing on so many levels.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I used to be a radical feminist/liberal, but left due to high taxes, government spending issues, and concerns about children's education. I believe the government shouldn't dictate personal matters or push sexuality in schools. Parents' rights are being eroded in California. I urge voting based on beliefs, not party affiliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I used to be a radical feminist slash liberal. And to this day, it's been the most embarrassing phase of my life. Like, it still makes me cringe. And people always ask me, hey, Chelly. What made you walk away from the democratic party slash liberalism? And it wasn't one big, like, wake up call for me. It was a process. It started when I first started paying taxes. I remember working 60 to 70 hour weeks only to get 30 to 40% of my paycheck cut from me. Realistically speaking, that's out of those 60 hours, I worked 20 of those for somebody else. And then my hate for Democrats got a lot worse when I started looking into government spending and I realized how they spent our money. For example, did you know that over the last 5 years, California spent over $20,000,000,000 on the homeless crisis? Now if you live in LA, you're wondering, hey. Where did that money go? Because it's only gotten worse. Right? It hasn't gotten any better. When you ask the government, they can't tell you how those $20,000,000,000 were spent. They don't know where they went. They can't even tell you if those $20,000,000,000 were effective because they're incapable of balancing a budget instead of reining in their spending. Do you know what they're doing? They're increasing taxes on the average American, meaning that more of the hours you work aren't gonna be for you or your family. They're gonna be for someone else. And you know who's getting screwed? The most middle class hardworking Americans, and that's the tip of the iceberg. That's just a financial side, and it does get worse. When when it comes to what Democrats how they're trying to groom children in schools, it's disturbing. It doesn't matter to me if you're gay, straight, or a fucking unicorn. I don't think the government should be involved in your everyday life or who you're attracted to at all. But there's absolutely no reason why the government should be trying to force sexuality into the curriculum and exposing young children and minors to sexuality at such a young age when it can actually harm their development. There's absolutely no reason that the government and the school system should be transitioning a young minor, encouraging them to get surgeries, encouraging to get medical treatments that they can't take back without the consent or knowledge from the parents. Actually, they help hide this from from the parents. When I was a kid, when an adult said, hey, don't tell your parents, that was a giant red flag. Why are we just glossing it over now and acting like all of this is okay? California every day tries to pass more laws to try and take away parental rights from their children. And don't take this as me saying, hey. Go be a Republican. I'm saying, hey. Go vote for what you believe in because I don't believe in anything that the democratic party stands for anymore. It's wrong. It's disturbing on so many levels.
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 1:10 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The governor of California just signed a bill causing massive destruction of parental rights and putting children at risk for permanent damage. Important to read this:

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

I’m afraid I have some terrible news. The governor of America’s largest and richest state has just signed a law that puts 10 million children and adolescents in grave danger of medical mistreatment. The media headlines have it wrong. They claim that California Governor Gavin Newsom’s new law protects children by stopping public schools from outing their new gender to their parents. It does just the opposite. It makes children vulnerable to irreversible and lifelong medical abuse and mistreatment. And it is all based on the pseudoscientific idea that some children are born into the wrong bodies and that we can change a person’s sex through drugs and surgery. For any of this to make sense, you have to understand what’s happening in Britain. Several years ago, the government appointed a well-respected pediatrician named Hillary Cass to investigate whether it was ethical to block the puberty of children, give them opposite-sex hormones, and perform surgeries on their bodies to make them feel better about their gender. Dr. Cass came back a few weeks ago and said no, absolutely not. Around the same time, the British government banned puberty blockers nationwide. And, just a few days ago, the new Labor Party government affirmed that it would maintain the former government’s ban. In her report, Cass said that the so-called “social transition,” whereby a child adopts the identity of the opposite sex, is not a neutral act and has psychological consequences. This means it is the first step toward medical intervention. What Gavin Newsom has done is actively prevented schools from informing parents that their children have been put on a medical pathway. This is an outrageous attack on the rights of children and parents. Children have a right to go through puberty. No adult should be able to block their puberty. And parents have a right to know if their child thinks that they are the opposite sex or were born into the wrong body. We have seen with leaked internal documents of the leading gender medicine group, WPATH, that these medical interventions, namely puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery, are not only irreversible but result in sterilization and loss of sexual function. Children or adolescents are simply not mature enough to understand the effects of so-called “gender-affirming care.” They cannot, in other words, give their informed consent. The new law creates the grave risk that activist teachers, students, and outside groups will convince their children that they were born into the wrong body, and hide their “social transition” from parents, which will lead to harmful medical mistreatment. As such, the law that Newsom just signed is the opposite of what both children and their parents need. We need schools to immediately warn parents if their children think they are the opposite sex. After all, this is a diagnosable psychiatric condition known as “gender dysphoria.” And if your child has a psychiatric disorder, whether anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or gender dysphoria, you have a right to know. And schools must stop teaching children, or allowing other people to teach children, the pseudoscientific and dehumanizing ideas that it’s possible to be born into the wrong body and possible to change one’s sex. As such, either the legislature, the courts, or a ballot initiative will be required to nullify Newsom’s law. Until then, it is important to spread the word to parents that California public schools are fundamentally unsafe for the millions of children who attend them.

Video Transcript AI Summary
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law preventing schools from informing parents if their children are on a medical pathway for gender transition. This law puts children at risk of irreversible medical treatments without parental consent. Similar actions in Britain have led to a ban on puberty blockers due to their harmful effects. Children and parents have the right to know about any potential gender dysphoria diagnosis. Schools should not promote the idea of being born in the wrong body. Action is needed to overturn this dangerous law in California to protect children and their parents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. It's Mike Schellenberger for Public. I'm afraid I have some terrible news. The governor of America's largest and richest state has just signed a law that puts 10,000,000 children and adolescents in grave danger of medical mistreatment. The media headlines are all wrong. They claim that California governor Gavin Newsom's new law protects children by stopping public schools from outing their gender to their parents. In fact, it does just the opposite of that. This new law makes children vulnerable to irreversible and lifelong medical abuse and mistreatment. And it's all based on a pseudo scientific idea that some children are born into the wrong bodies and that we can change a person's sex through drugs and surgery. Now for any of this to make sense, you have to understand what's happening right now in Britain. Several years ago, the government there appointed a well respected pediatrician named Hillary Cass to investigate whether it's ethical to block the puberty of children, give them opposite sex hormones, and perform surgeries on their bodies in an effort to make them feel better about their gender. Doctor. Kass came back a few weeks ago and said no, absolutely not. Around the same time, the British government banned puberty blockers nationwide. And just a few days ago, the new Labour Party government affirmed that it would maintain the former conservative government's ban on puberty blockers. In her report, Cass said that so called social transition, where a children adopts the identity of the opposite sex, is not a neutral act and has psychological consequences. In fact, it's the first step towards medical intervention. What What Gavin Newsom has done is actively prevented schools from informing parents that their children have been put on a medical pathway. This is an outrageous attack on both the rights of the children and the parents. Children have a right to go through puberty. No adult should be able to block their puberty, and parents have a right to know if their children thinks that they are the opposite sex or were born into the wrong body. We have seen with leaked internal documents from the leading gender medicine group, WPATH, that these medical interventions, namely puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries are not only irreversible but result in sterilization and loss of sexual function. Children and adolescents are simply not mature enough to understand the effects of so called gender affirming care. They cannot, in other words, give their informed consent. The new law that Gavin Newsom just signed creates the grave risk that activist teachers, students, and outside groups will convince children that they were born into the wrong body and then hide their social transition from parents which will lead to these harmful medical mistreatments. As such, the law that was passed is the opposite of what both children and their parents need. We need schools to immediately warn parents if their children think they are the opposite sex. After all, this is a diagnosable psychiatric condition known as gender dysphoria. And if your child has a psychiatric disorder, whether it's anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or gender dysphoria, you as a parent have a right to know, and schools must stop teaching children or allowing other people to teach children this pseudo scientific and dehumanizing ideas that it's possible to be born in the wrong body and it's possible to change one sex. It's not. As such, either the legislature, the courts, or a ballot initiative in California is required to nullify this law. Until then, it's important to spread the word to parents that California public schools are fundamentally unsafe for the millions of children who currently attend them.
Saved - December 21, 2024 at 12:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned about the education system's approach to teaching children, particularly regarding how it fosters fear and promotes government control as a solution. I see examples like teaching that climate change necessitates regulation, or that banning transgender services leads to increased suicides, which suggests a need for government intervention. Other instances include narratives around police reform, COVID-19 mandates, and free speech limitations. I wonder how future topics, like drones, will be framed and what implications that will have for surveillance and control.

@Jenn_McW - Jennifer McWilliams

Just wait until the education system decides to teach your children about “the drones”. Today our “trauma-informed” education system profits from manipulating societal experiences/opinions to drive unreasonable fear in children. They exploit the fear they create to brainwash children into thinking the only way to be safe is to give the government more control. In other words- create the chaos & drive the “solution”. Examples: 1. Teach children climate change will kill us all if the government doesn’t regulate everything. 2. Teach children banning transgender services will increase su!cides and the government should usurp parental rights to ensure they can mutilate themselves. 3. Teach George Floyd was killed by an officer for being black and the government should defund the police. 4. Teach children if everyone doesn’t get the Covid V then they will die so the government should mandate them. 5. Teach children that people will die bc of free speech on social media platforms by spreading dangerous “misinformation & hate speech” therefore the government should amend the 1st amendment. 🤔 Wonder what the drone situation will bring? The drones are a threat and the government should have more surveillance over the people? @CourageHabit

Saved - January 17, 2025 at 1:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated by the recent "Parents' Bill of Rights" in Ohio. It mandates that schools inform parents if their child wants to change their gender, bans gender ideology in K-3, and lets parents opt out of sexual content lessons. Why are teachers upset about transparency with parents?

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Ohio teacher has a meltdown because Ohio passed the "Parents' Bill of Rights" which requires schools inform parents if their kid decides to change their gender, bans gender ideology indoctrination in K-3, and allows parents to opt their kids out of lessons with s*xual content. Why would any teacher be mad about not being able to keep secrets from parents and parents having a say in their childrens' education?

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the middle of the night, Ohio politicians passed a controversial bill known as the "don't say gay" bill, initially introduced as the parents' bill of rights. Supporters claim it aims to strengthen the parent-child relationship, blaming teachers for any disconnect. The bill requires teachers to inform parents if a student confides about being part of the LGBTQ+ community. While some argue this is necessary for parental awareness, others believe it undermines the child's trust in teachers. A proposed amendment, dubbed the "shame on you" bill, suggests that parents who fail to create a safe environment for their children should be held accountable, as children should feel comfortable discussing important issues at home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Middle of the night while everyone else was sleeping, politicians in Ohio said, you know what would be a good job? Do you know how we can really help the youth and the students within the state of Ohio? We can get out of our bed in the middle of the night, leave our families behind, tiptoe in, and vote in a new bill. That is exactly what Ohio did yesterday, and they introduced the don't say gay bill. This bill was actually introduced last year in 2023 as the parents' bill of rights. And the supporters of this bill, see, what they said is that this bill is there to protect the critical relationship of the parent and the child. As you know who they blamed the lack of that relationship on, teachers. Why are teachers being used as a scapegoat? I digress. That's how I think. So in this bill, teachers now are required to let parents know if a student has come to them and revealed that they might be part of the LGTBQ plus community. Some say this absolutely should be happening because this is a child who is talking about things within their body that the parent should know about. And other people say, well, the child has come to me in confidence as they are learning, growing and thinking about their own body. I'm not necessarily giving out advice, I'm just being a sounding board. Now let's say we go the route with we should tell we should tell the parent. We should tell the parent if a conversation like that has happened. I also think there needs to be amendment in the bill called the shame on you bill. The shame on you bill. And then I think teachers then get to turn in a parent that did not create that safe environment where their own child their own child felt safer with a teacher than they did with them at home, and I think that should be called the shame on you, Bill. Because if your child is going to a teacher other than you about something so important that we have to have a federal bill on it, then shame on you for not creating the environment the child needed to be able to be honest within the own walls of their home. Have a great night.
Saved - April 28, 2025 at 4:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Planned Parenthood is rapidly becoming a leading provider of puberty blockers for teenagers, treating nearly 12,000 individuals aged 12 to 17. Following the closure of abortion clinics post-Roe v. Wade, the organization appears to have shifted focus to generate revenue through these treatments, often without thorough medical evaluations. Detransitioners like Helena Kirschner and Pat Catterson share alarming experiences of receiving hormone prescriptions after minimal consultations. Additionally, Planned Parenthood's influence on sex education raises concerns about its role in shaping young people's perceptions of gender identity. The organization receives substantial taxpayer funding, prompting questions about its broader impact on families.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 Planned Parenthood is quickly becoming one of the number one providers of puberty blockers to teenagers in America “Almost 12,000 teenagers, aged 12 to 17, have been treated with puberty blockers or pro trans counseling by Planned Parenthood” “I guess after the overturning of Roe v Wade and the consequential closure of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics all over the country, the company hit the drawing board and asked how can we make up for this loss of revenue? The answer, it turns out, was pretty simple. And as a result, to date, almost twelve thousand teenagers, aged 12 to 17, have been treated, I hate even using that word, with puberty blockers or pro trans counseling by planned parenthood. More often than not, with zero history of gender dysphoria and no actual medical diagnostic process. Stories of detransitioners like Helena Kirschner are starting to expose just how bad Planned Parenthood's counseling actually is. This beautiful young woman walked into a Planned Parenthood clinic, and in less than an hour, she was given 4x the typical starting dose of testosterone hormone replacement therapy by a nurse practitioner. Less than an hour. Pat Catterson, another young woman, less than an hour, expected that she would have to go through some sort of diagnostic process, but instead called a doctor from Planned Parenthood for 30 minutes on the phone and was given a prescription for testosterone. Thirty minutes. When you also consider that Planned Parenthood is probably the number one author of sex ed curriculum in our country today, influencing millions upon millions of young men and women in conversations about gender identity at school every day. How are people not realizing this is literally just a pyramid scheme to indoctrinate kids into thinking I was born in the wrong body, to call these clinics on the phone for half an hour, and to be given prescriptions of these drugs from planned parenthood themselves. Reminder, by the way, that this organization receives $700,000,000 from the United States government taxpayer money every single year. Turns out, you can destroy the family in a whole lot more ways than just abortion, and this organization is committed to figuring out how to do”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Planned Parenthood is reportedly becoming a top provider of puberty blockers to teenagers in America after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Almost 12,000 teenagers aged 12-17 have allegedly been treated with puberty blockers or "pro trans counseling" by Planned Parenthood, often with no prior history of gender dysphoria or medical diagnosis. Detransitioners' stories are exposing the alleged inadequacy of Planned Parenthood's counseling. One woman, Helena Kirschner, was allegedly given four times the typical starting dose of testosterone hormone replacement therapy by a nurse practitioner in under an hour. Another woman, Pat Katzen, allegedly received a testosterone prescription after a 30-minute phone call with a Planned Parenthood doctor. Given Planned Parenthood's influence on sex education curriculum and its $700 million in annual taxpayer funding, the speaker suggests the organization is running a "pyramid scheme" to indoctrinate children into believing they were "born in the wrong body" and then prescribe them medication.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I already knew this was happening, and I am still flabbergasted by this. Planned Parenthood of all companies is quickly becoming one of the number one providers of puberty blockers to teenagers in America. I guess after the overturning of Roe v Wade and the consequential closure of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics all over the country, the company hit the drawing board and asked how can we make up for this loss of revenue? The answer, it turns out, was pretty simple. And as a result, to date, almost twelve thousand teenagers aged 12 to 17 have been treated, I hate even using that word, with puberty blockers or pro trans counseling by Planned Parenthood. More often than not, with zero history of gender dysphoria and no actual medical diagnostic process. Stories of detransitioners like Helena Kirschner are starting to expose just how bad Planned Parenthood's counseling actually is. This beautiful young woman walked into a Planned Parenthood clinic, and in less than an hour, she was given four times the typical starting dose of testosterone hormone replacement therapy by a nurse practitioner. Less than an hour. Pat Katzen, another young woman, expected that she would have to go through some sort of diagnostic process, but instead called a doctor from Planned Parenthood for thirty minutes on the phone and was given a prescription for testosterone. Thirty minutes. When you also consider that Planned Parenthood is probably the number one author of sex ed curriculum in our country today, influencing millions upon millions of young men and women in conversations about gender identity at school every day. How are people not realizing this is literally just a pyramid scheme to indoctrinate kids into thinking I was born in the wrong body, to call these clinics on the phone for half an hour, and to be given prescriptions of these drugs from Planned Parenthood themselves. Reminder, by the way, that this organization receives $700,000,000 from the United States government taxpayer money every single year. Turns out you can destroy the family in a whole lot more ways than just abortion, and this organization is committed to figuring out how to do it.
Saved - May 5, 2025 at 12:17 AM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The indoctrination in America starts early American mother “Why are y'all asking my two year old at a pediatric appointment what gender she is and what pronouns she prefers? She doesn't even know her ABCs” https://t.co/hOiNBf1RKF

Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker questions why a two-year-old child was asked about gender identity and preferred pronouns at a pediatric appointment, pointing out the child's age and limited understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why are y'all asking my two year old at a pediatric appointment what gender she is and what pronouns she prefers? She doesn't even know her ABCs.
Saved - June 27, 2025 at 9:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflect on the evolution of the gay rights movement, noting its significant victories, such as marriage equality and protections against discrimination. However, I observe a troubling shift towards radicalization, focusing on gender ideology rather than the original goals of equality and respect. The movement now emphasizes a rejection of the sex binary, leading to contentious debates around gender-affirming care for minors. While I support trans rights, I worry about the implications of these changes for gay and lesbian identities and the potential backlash against our hard-won rights. We must protect our achievements while fostering open dialogue.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

How the Gay Rights Movement Radicalized, and Lost Its Way By Andrew Sullivan for @nytopinion 🧵⬇️

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

GIFT LINK: How the Gay Rights Movement Radicalized, and Lost Its Way By Andrew Sullivan https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/26/opinion/gay-lesbian-trans-rights.html?unlocked_article_code=1.R08.UNTn.rcnCfw_BTEMT&smid=url-share

Opinion | How the Gay Rights Movement Radicalized, and Lost Its Way (Gift Article) How the Gay Rights Movement Radicalized, and Lost Its Way nytimes.com

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Ten years ago Thursday, the movement for gay and lesbian equality scored a victory that only a decade before had seemed unimaginable. We won equal rights to civil marriage in every state in the country. In 2020 came another stunning win. In a majority opinion written by one of President Trump’s nominees, Justice Neil Gorsuch, the Supreme Court found that gay men, lesbians and transgender men and women are covered under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and protected from employer discrimination. In 2024, the Republican Party removed opposition to marriage equality from its platform, and the current Republican Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, is a married gay man with two children. Gay marriage is backed by around 70 percent of Americans, and discrimination against gay men, lesbians and transgender people is opposed by 80 percent. As civil rights victories go, it doesn’t get more decisive or comprehensive than this.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

But a funny thing happened in the wake of these triumphs. Far from celebrating victory, defending the gains, staying vigilant, but winding down as a movement that had achieved its core objectives — including the end of H.I.V. in the United States as an unstoppable plague — gay and lesbian rights groups did the opposite. Swayed by the broader liberal shift to the “social justice” left, they radicalized.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

In 2023, the Human Rights Campaign @HRC, the largest gay, lesbian and transgender civil rights group in the country, declared a “state of emergency” for gay men, lesbians and transgender people — the first time in the organization’s existence. It had not declared a state of emergency when gay men were jailed for having sex in private, when the AIDS epidemic killed hundreds of thousands of gay men or when we faced a possible constitutional amendment banning marriage equality in 2004. In fact, we found out, this “emergency” was almost entirely in response to new state bills proposing restrictions on medical treatment for minors with gender dysphoria; bathroom and locker room bans; and transgender issues in school curricula and sports.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Nonetheless, the money has poured into gay, lesbian and transgender groups in the past decade. Charitable funding for such groups totaled $387 million in 2012, according to the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy’s Equitable Giving Lab. By 2021, it was $823 million. L.G.B.T.Q.+ organizations also saw their assets grow 76 percent from 2019 to 2021 — around double the size of their increase in donations. A group like @GLAAD — founded in 1985 to combat anti-gay media bias in the depths of the AIDS epidemic — saw its funding increase sixfold between 2014 and 2023. The Human Rights Campaign @HRC has also seen revenues soar in the past decade.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

But this huge increase in funding was no longer primarily about gay, lesbian and transgender civil rights, because almost all had already been won. It was instead about a new and radical gender revolution. Focused on ending what activists saw as the oppression of the sex binary, which some critical gender and queer theorists associated with “white supremacy,” they aimed to dissolve natural distinctions between men and women in society, to replace biological sex with “gender identity” in the law and culture, and to redefine homosexuality, in the process, not as a neutral fact of the human condition but as a liberating ideological “queerness” meant to subvert and “queer” language, culture and society in myriad different ways.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

The words gay and lesbian all but disappeared. L.G.B.T. became L.G.B.T.Q., then L.G.B.T.Q.+, and more letters and characters kept being added: L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ or 2S.L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ (to include intersex, asexual people and two-spirit Indigenous people). The plus sign referred to a seemingly infinite number of new niche identities, and, by some counts, more than 70 new “genders.” The point was that this is all one revolutionary, intersectional community of gender-diverse people, and intertwined with other left causes, from Black Lives Matter to Queers for Palestine.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

They needed a new banner for that. So the rainbow flag, invented back in 1978 at the request of Harvey Milk, was replaced over the last few years by a new “Progress” flag, representing intersectional oppression. Black and brown stripes were added to the rainbow — for Black and brown people (and the people lost during the AIDS crisis) — and pink, light blue and white for trans people. That flag now demarcates a place not simply friendly to all types of people, as the old rainbow flag did, but a place where anyone who does not subscribe to intersectional left ideology is unwelcome.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

“Queer” was a way of summing up the new regime, a clear sign that this really was a different movement than the gay, lesbian and transgender civil rights movement of the past. It’s a word that can easily trigger gay men over 40 who remember it as the last slur they once heard before being bashed in the head. But one of the striking aspects of the younger queer generation is their disdain for those who came before them.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

As I watched all this radical change, I wondered, was I just another old fart, shaking my fist at the sky, like every older generation known to man? Why not just accept that the next gay and lesbian generation has new ideas, has moved on, and old-timers like me should just move aside? And some of the changes are indeed welcome. The greater acceptance of trans people is a huge step forward for all of us. But then, as I told my friends (gay, trans and everyone else), I’d always believed this and always supported trans civil rights. I was glad when, five years ago, the Supreme Court gave transgender people civil rights protection in employment. I’ve also long lived in a gay world that is skewed left, and, along with my fellow gay non-lefties, I’ve long made my peace with it, or tried to.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

But this new ideology, I believed, was different. Like many gays and lesbians — and a majority of everybody else — I simply didn’t buy it. I didn’t and don’t believe that being a man or a woman has nothing to do with biology. My sexual orientation is based on a biological distinction between men and women: I’m attracted to the former and not to the latter. And now I was supposed to believe the difference didn’t exist? I’m more than happy to accept that there are some people — not all that many — who don’t fit in that binary, and want to be protected from discrimination and allowed full access to medical interventions in order to live lives that are true to who they are. And I’m with them all the way. After all, I, too, am a part of a minority — most people live their lives governed by heterosexual desires. Thanks to the gay and lesbian movement, I’m not being asked to.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

But abolishing the sex binary for the entire society? That’s a whole other thing entirely. And madness, I believe. What if I redefined what it is to be heterosexual and imposed it on straight people? Or changed what it means to be a man or a woman, for that matter? Then it ceases to be accommodation of a minority and becomes a societywide revolution — an overreach that would soon lead to a potent and sane backlash, against not just trans people, but gay men and lesbians as well.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

The gay rights movement, especially in the marriage years, had long asked for simple liberal equality and mutual respect — live and let live. Reform, not revolution. No one’s straight marriage would change if gay marriage arrived, we pledged. You can bring up your children however you like. We will leave you alone. We will leave your children alone. But in the wake of victory, L.G.B.T.Q.+ groups reneged on that pledge. They demanded the entire society change in a fundamental way so that the sex binary no longer counted. Elementary school children were taught that being a boy or a girl might not have anything to do with their bodies, and that their parents had merely guessed whether they were a boy or a girl when they were born. In fact, sex was no longer to be recognized at birth — it was now merely assigned, penciled in. We got new terms like “chest-feeding” for “breastfeeding” and “birthing parent” for “mother."

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

A key leader of this movement, Chase Strangio, informed us that “a penis is not a male body part. It’s just an unusual body part for a woman.” We all were suddenly expected to announce our pronouns as if everyone didn’t already know. Then neopronouns — xe/xem! — were added. The movement came up with a mantra: “TRANS WOMEN ARE WOMEN. TRANS MEN ARE MEN.” It was not an argument, nor a proposition to be explored or debated. It was a theological command. In all caps.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Was there any debate among gays and lesbians about this profound change, a vote taken, or even a poll of gay men and lesbians? None that I can find or recall. And, as in other “social justice” spaces, dissent was equated with bigotry. Dissenters from gender ideology are routinely unfriended, shunned and shamed. Almost all of the gay men, trans people and lesbians who have confided in me that they don’t agree with this, or think that @JK_Rowling or @Martina Navratilova have some good points, have said so sotto voce lest anyone overhear. That’s the extremely intolerant and illiberal atmosphere that now exists in the gay, lesbian and transgender space. This little community used to champion all manner of expression or argument or speech, eccentrics and visionaries. Now it’s fearful, self-censored and extremely uptight. Debate has been all but snuffed out; total uniformity of thought is demanded.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

But this illiberalism made a fateful, strategic mistake. In the gay rights movement, there had always been an unspoken golden rule: Leave children out of it. We knew very well that any overreach there could provoke the most ancient blood libel against us: that we groom and abuse kids. You can bring up your children however you like, we promised. We will leave you alone. We will leave your children alone. So what did the gender revolutionaries go and do? They focused almost entirely on children and minors. Partly because the adult issues had been resolved or close to it, and partly because true cultural revolutions start with the young, it meant overhauling the education not only of children with gender dysphoria, but of every other kid as well.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Kids all over the country were impacted. Your children were taught in elementary school that being a boy or a girl was something they could choose and change at will. Your daughter found herself running against a trans girl (i.e. a biological male) in athletics. Children in elementary school got to pick pronouns, and some children socially transitioned at school without their parents’ knowledge or permission. I suppose there are other ways you can resurrect the ghost of Anita Bryant, and all the homophobic paranoia that followed her, but this will probably do the trick.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

And then most radical of all: gender-affirming care for minors, which can lead to irreversible sex changes for children. The “care” included off-label “blockers” to arrest puberty, almost always followed with cross-sex hormones. To begin with, gays and lesbians, including me, empathized with kids with gender dysphoria, and trusted the medical profession with the rest. If this helped kids or even saved their lives, as was often emphasized, what business was it of mine? If transitioning this young in life would helped some pass better as adults, good for them.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Still, questions lingered, drawn from my own life. As a child, uninterested in playing team sports but very interested in the boys who played team sports, I was once asked by a girl when I was just 10 years old, “Are you sure you’re not really a girl?” Of course not, I replied. But I wonder how I might have responded if someone in authority — a parent or a teacher or a doctor — had suggested that my difference and occasional anxiety was because I was, in fact, a girl. That my body was irrelevant, and that I could choose to be the opposite sex before puberty and all my confusions would disappear. I just don’t know what I would have said or done, to be honest.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

And how do today’s parents, teachers and doctors know for surethat a 10-year-old child isn’t, well, like me, and really is trans? How can they know for sure that the gender dysphoria isn’t instead a manifestation of being gay or lesbian and wanting to change it? How do they know for sure there isn’t another complicating personal or psychological factor? I was told not to worry. A child had to demonstrate a “persistent, consistent and insistent” trans identity for years even to be considered for medical intervention.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

But this, I found out, was no longer true. The whole point of the new regime of gender-affirming care was that it rejected broad mental health assessments of children that could ensure that mistakes really didn’t happen. The old “persistent, consistent and insistent” model was deemed transphobic and loosened to become an affirmation policy. As soon as a kid said he or she was the opposite sex, further counseling and mental health exploration was deemed problematic, because it amounted to transphobic conversion therapy, we were told. When I said that seemed crazy, and that surely we needed more safeguards, I was sternly told, “Children know who they are.”

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

But do they? When they are between 9 and 13? I sure didn’t. Does any parent really believe this? Solid long-term data on how many children who transition but decide later it was a mistake is hard to find, in large part because the procedures are relatively new and the studies often have very poor follow-up. But without a doubt, there are some. They are walking around today, testifying in courts and legislatures, opining all over the web, telling similar stories of rushed judgments, minimal safeguards, inadequate gate-keeping and agonizing regret that as children they made irreversible decisions they could not meaningfully consent to.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

I have met many. They break your heart. And so many of the gender-dysphoric kids are gay and lesbian. Of course they are, and there are many more children who will grow up to be gay and lesbian than who will grow up to be trans. When adolescents referred to a British gender clinic were asked about their sexualityin 2012, some 90 percent of females and 80 percent of males said they were same-sex attracted or bisexual.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

In the Netherlands, the famous Dutch protocol for gender-affirming care was pioneered in the 1990s with far stricter safeguards in place than exist in the United States today. There, of a cohort of 70 adolescents referred to an Amsterdam clinic from 2000 to 2008, 62 were same-sex attracted. And it’s easy to see that one way to “cure” yourself of attraction to the same sex is to become the opposite one. At Britain’s now-shuttered Tavistock clinic, according to the investigative journalist Hannah Barnes, staff members had a dark joke that at the rate they were going, there would be “no gay people left.” This is why sex-change surgeries are permitted and even subsidized in Iran: It’s a way to rid the country of gay people.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

And a fix for gender dysphoria for gay and lesbian kids can be puberty itself, as it was for me and many of my gay male friends. Once my own hormones kicked in, my anxieties evaporated. I lovedbeing a boy, I realized. Puberty blockers literally block gay and lesbian kids from the chance at that possible resolution of their gender dysphoria. There is a real conflict here, and it’s obscured by the L.G.B.T.Q.+ identity.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

We were also told, repeatedly, that transitioning children was drastic, but the alternative could be that they would commit suicide. “We often ask parents, ‘Would you rather have a dead son than a live daughter?’” Johanna Olson-Kennedy, a vocal advocate of these treatments, told ABC News in 2011. But even the American Civil Liberties Union @ACLU’s Mr. Strangio admitted, when arguing before the Supreme Court last year, that suicide “thankfully and admittedly is rare.” In one study from Britain, of some 15,000 adolescents referred for gender care over a decade, there were four likely or confirmed suicides two who had been seen and two had not. One suicide is awful — and suicidality is real among kids with gender dysphoria. But that doesn’t mean that suicide is what will happen if you don’t transition a child.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

One specific concern for boys who transition to girls in early puberty. “If you’ve never had an orgasm pre-surgery, and then your puberty’s blocked, it’s very difficult to achieve that afterwards,” a pioneering trans surgeon, Dr. Marci Bowers, has said. Research on this is minimal, and so caution is necessary in jumping to conclusions. But I ask myself: If there is a risk that some people will be denied sexual pleasure for their entire life because they transitioned very early, is it worth it? And how can a child understand what giving up orgasms for life might mean when he hasn’t experienced a single one? The obvious answer is that he can’t, and it’s profoundly unethical to put him in that situation. And who exactly is looking out for these kids? Certainly not the L.G.B.T.Q. organizations.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

How did a movement that began with sexual liberation end up doing that? By drift, activist extremism, a social media bubble and suppression of free debate. Soon enough, the right began associating what used to be the lesbian and gay movement with this gender extremism, and the L.G.B.T.Q.+ movement responded not by moderating tone or substance, but by closing ranks, seemingly determined to prove its point.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Dissent became anathema. When this newspaper reported on controversies in gender medicine, GLAAD parked a billboard truck outside the New York Times Building on several occasions, demanding the coverage change. In relatively new, disputed medical territory, partisans have insisted that “the science is settled.” When a book came out criticizing childhood transition, Mr. Strangio declared: “Stopping the circulation of this book and these ideas is 100% a hill I will die on.” Public speeches by dissenters have faced abuse, intimidation, and far too often, threats of violence.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

It’s a horrible reversal of history: For so long, First Amendment rights were the primary constitutional right gays and lesbians could fully and regularly exercise, and we treasured them. If censorship was in the air, gay men and lesbians were the first to oppose it. We knew who was shut up first when it came to shutting people up, and we knew we would always be a small minority. The idea that we would tell other people what words they can use, shut down speakers, criticize journalists and threaten others into silence was once absurd. Yet these are now the signature tools of the L.G.B.T.Q.+ movement. They do not seek to engage or persuade opponents; they seek to demonize, bully or cancel them.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Or take the campaign for marriage equality. We were almost pathologically civil, willing to debate anyone anywhere, and the harder the nut to crack, the better. For two decades, I went to fundamentalist churches in Idaho, Mormon groups, Catholic universities, conservative media, right-wing talk shows and C-SPAN, and published an anthology that included views from bothsides. We knew that if we wanted to win, and not just posture, we needed to reach conservatives and moderates and explore where we might agree. And it worked! It took time, and we were laughed at at first, but you could see the polling slowly, inexorably shift toward us, from one-quarter to two-thirds in our favor from the 1990s to the 2010s, as our arguments and openness slowly, person by person, won over the country.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Now, look at the recent results of the L.G.B.T.Q.+ movement. In the last five years, activists have actually managed to move public opinion away from their causes in many respects. In 2021, for example, 62 percent of Americans said that transgender athletes should be able to play only on teams that matched their gender at birth; by 2023, that figure had risen to 69 percent. This is not bigotry at work. This year, the very same pollster found that a solid majority of Americans — 56 percent — favor policies protecting trans people from discrimination. Americans are broadly fine with transgender people. They are fine with gay people. They just reject replacing the fact of biological sex with the phantasms of gender ideology.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

And it’s not because most people don’t know any trans people personally. When people who know a trans person personally were polled, only 40 percent in 2021 supported their competing in teams that matched their gender identity; by 2023, that dropped to 30 percent. On the medical question, 46 percent of Americanssupported banning medical care related to gender transitions for minors in 2022. Today, as people have learned more, 56 percent do. Trans extremism was taken up with gusto by Republicans as an issue and it most likely helped move swing voters to Mr. Trump last year. In one post-election survey, cultural issues, including transgender issues, were slightly more salient for swing voters than even immigration and inflation.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

I hoped this might prompt a rethink as the election results sank in. Last week’s Skrmetti decision at the Supreme Court was another reality check, as the court upheld Tennessee’s ban on certain medical treatments for transgender youth, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy, rejecting claims that the ban violated the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause and shielding similar laws in other states. When the ruling came down, the mood among L.G.B.T.Q.+ groups was defiant. So the ranks are being closed again.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

If Mr. Trump is against childhood sex reassignment, then we must be for it. If Mr. Trump says there are two sexes, we must insist that there is a spectrum. It will be very hard to break this dynamic in such a tribal atmosphere, especially when there is genuine transphobia among some on the right. But it would be incredibly healthy if we were to allow an actual debate in the community about the direction we are headed in, and treat dissenters less like bigots and traitors. Representative Sarah McBride, the first openly trans member of Congress, echoed this sentiment on @EzraKlein’s podcast last week. But she was condemned on social media as a traitor to trans people.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

This intransigence matters because, left on its current trajectory, the L.G.B.T.Q.+ gender movement carries significant risks for gay, lesbian and trans equality. Gallup found that satisfaction with the acceptance of gay and lesbian people peaked at 62 percent in 2022 but dropped to 51 percent by January of this year. The center and right — whom some of us spent a lifetime engaging — are being lost. Gallup showed Republican support for gay marriage dropping from 55 to 46 percent between 2022 and 2025.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

History strongly suggests that periods of toleration of gay men and lesbians can swiftly end if the public senses an overreach. That may be where we now are. No society has ever been as free for gay men, lesbians and transgender people as the modern West today. There is no such thing as the Human Rights Campaign’s “state of emergency,” and it was absurd to say so. But for some activists, there has to be. As Francis Fukuyama put it in “The End of History and the Last Man,” “Experience suggests that if men cannot struggle on behalf of a just cause because that just cause was victorious in an earlier generation, then they will struggle againstthe just cause.”

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

Returning to a civil rights model and abandoning the quixotic attempt to end the sex binary do not mean, as some might have it, throwing trans people under the bus. Trans people are already on the bus; they are protected from employment discrimination under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Their existing rights should be defended and expanded to public accommodations — especially the adult right to have access to gender medicine through Medicaid, which is now being threatened. Americans should back us on that. But fighting a losing battle to allow trans women to compete in women’s sports and for biological men to be in women’s intimate spaces, and to perpetuate risky, inadequately tested sex changes on children, including gay and lesbian ones, is dumb, offensive to common sense and risks a much bigger backlash.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

This does not mean the L.G.B.T.Q.+ project should be shut down entirely. We need to defend our wins; we need to protect the interests of gays, lesbians and trans people. We need to greatly expand help and care for children with gender dysphoria, prevent bullying and increase mental health resources. Protecting them from often irreversible sex changes should not mean abandoning them. It should mean renewed concern, support and, above all, solid, evidence-based research on how best we can help.

@benryanwriter - Benjamin Ryan

But in America, on, this anniversary of the Obergefell decision, we also need to remember a critical thing: We won. We won because we defended free speech, reached out to right and left and center, left others and children alone — and trusted liberal democracy. That trust was rewarded with one of the swiftest successes in civil rights history. Let’s not throw it away.

Saved - August 30, 2025 at 9:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I express deep concern about the influence of transgender ideology on children, arguing it lacks scientific basis and is driven by profit motives. I believe children are being exposed to these ideas prematurely, often leading to irreversible medical interventions that can harm their development and mental health. Many children who experience gender confusion may outgrow these feelings, yet they are being pushed into life-altering decisions. I highlight the risks associated with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, and the troubling reality that parents can face consequences for resisting this ideology.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Children Are Being Preyed Upon...Transgender Ideology Is Based In Fraud." Dr Sheila Furey, Child Psychiatrist "It Isn't Medical Based. It Isn't Scientifically Based. It's A Trillion Dollar Industry That seeks To Fast Track Transgender Drugs & Surgery Onto Our Most Vulnerable." Ideas being pushed on kids today didn’t come from biology — they came from adults with agendas. A child doesn’t suddenly believe they’re in the “wrong body” without someone planting that idea. Once they repeat it out loud, there’s a whole system ready with pills, blockers & surgeries — and big money behind it. Blocking healthy development isn’t health care. It’s a pipeline. And children deserve better. Well before a child learns the difference between adjectives & verbs, activists in many government schools are teaching their pre-K students lessons on transgender pronouns—pronouns like ‘ze’ and ‘zir.’ Public libraries host ‘drag queen story time’ for children of all ages. Teachers are sharing their own intimate sexual encounter stories & openly dressing as the opposite sex in front of their students. It is dangerous & destructive to coerce & push children, whose minds are still developing, to make such life-altering decisions at such young ages – especially since 90% of children who experience gender confusion, no longer hold that view by the time they are 18...if loved & allowed to develop on their own without medical interventions. Many gender-confused children also suffer from mental health issues. Children who identify as transgender are up to 13 times more likely to have ADHD, depression or anxiety than non-transgender children. A study out of the United Kingdom found that 35% of the children who received gender treatment had moderate or severe autism. Many European countries have restricted the use of hormone treatments & surgeries on children. Most notably, the United Kingdom’s National Health Service shut down its transgender youth treatment center, the Tavistock Clinic, after an investigation revealed that the clinic had put young people “at considerable risk” of long-term mental distress. Activists push parents to give their children “gender-affirming care,” including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones & surgeries. Often with the threat & coercion statement...if you don't, you will have a dead son/daughter. These drugs and surgeries can inflict irreparable harm on children. Puberty blockers are hormone-based injections or implants given to children as young as 8 years old to delay the onset of puberty. Gonadotropin, the hormone used in puberty blockers, is the same hormone used to chemically castrate sex offenders. It can leave children with diminished bone density and harm their future fertility. Activists claim that “gender affirming care” improves the mental health of children with gender confusion. However, a study in the American Journal of Psychiatry found that there is no reduction in mental health issues following hormone treatments or sex-reassignment surgeries. Cross-sex hormones begin to transition children to appear more like the other gender. Boys take estrogen, which can cause infertility, blood clots & heart problems. Girls take testosterone, which can also cause infertility, male-pattern baldness & high blood pressure. Adults have given cross-sex hormones to children as young as 13 years old. Sex-reassignment surgeries, including mastectomies, phalloplasty & vaginoplasty are irreversible. They can result in infertility & loss of sexual function. Activists have advocated for 15-year-old girls to access double mastectomies & 17-year-old boys to receive vaginoplasties. American parents have struggled to protect their children from these radical procedures. Parents in some states can lose custody of their children for refusing to abide by the transgender ideology. In Oregon, children as young as 15 years old can receive Medicaid-funded hormone treatments without their parents’ consent. 👇Sexualization Of Children Destroys Lives👇 https://thenewamerican.com/video/dr-sheila-furey-sexualization-of-children-destroys-lives-morality-and-america/ 👇A Psychiatrist Perspective On Transgenderism👇 https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/the-feds1/episodes/47--Dr--Sheila-Furey-A-Psychiatrists-Perspective-on-Covid-and-Transgenderism-e2m4vui/a-abehvk8 👇Evidence Over Ideology👇 https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2024/09/96005/ Speaker: Dr Sheila Furey, MD Video: @Wellness_Radar

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Transgendered ideology, it's based in fraud." "We are born or we are conceived either a girl or a boy from eternity." "We are not plethora of unending gender choices." "So the whole concept that this is free choice is absolutely a lie." "Right? It isn't medical based. It isn't scientifically based." "And then we to further add insult to injury, we wanna recommend immediately that they go into a pipeline of drugs." "Children are being preyed upon, and they're being preyed upon by those who want to make them a part or a symbol of this movement, this religious cult."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transgendered ideology, it's based in fraud. We are born or we are conceived either a girl or a boy from eternity. All. Since the beginning of man, we are male and we are female. Yes. We are not plethora of unending gender choices. One of the things is is the the psychiatrist, psychologist, social worker who's ever doing this implanting their own thoughts in a child, if they come out of an office and say, I'm now transgender, well, how did that thought come about if they never had that thought before? So if you push an agenda, you can manipulate these children into having thoughts and feelings that were never present there in the first place. There are many underlying things that can affect and make a child or an adult vulnerable to a community that is really preying upon them. So the whole concept that this is free choice is absolutely a lie. Children are being preyed upon, and they're being preyed upon by those who want to make them a part or a symbol of this movement, this religious cult. Right? It isn't medical based. It isn't scientifically based. And then we to further add insult to injury, we wanna recommend immediately that they go into a pipeline of drugs.
Dr. Sheila Furey: Sexualization of Children Destroys Lives, Morality and America The effects of exposure to sexual content on children are severely detrimental. This exposure often leads to various psychological issues, such as anxiety, depression, self-injurious behavior, and premature sexualization. There are instances where children as young as eight develop addictions to pornography and self-stimulation, which result in neurological changes that impede their cognitive and intellectual ... thenewamerican.com
47. Dr. Sheila Furey: A Psychiatrist’s Perspective on Covid and Transgenderism  by The Feds 47. Dr. Sheila Furey: A Psychiatrist’s Perspective on Covid and Transgenderism  Psychiatrist Dr. Sheila Furey, co-founder of the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance, joins The Feds this week to speak about the transgender push within our country. She gives insight into the narratives the medical system fed her before and during Covid and tells of the resulting physical and moral injury on children. She provides thoughts and words for speaking with children about transgenderism. Dr. Furey warns of the current school system’s policies that block parents from being notified of the medical and emotional treatments given to their children while in school.  Dr. Sheila Furey is a graduate of Creighton University School of Medicine. She completed her residency in psychiatry and fellowship in Child Psychiatry at Boston University Hospitals. Dr. Furey has been in clinical practice for over 25 years and has treated adults and children in hospital and outpatient settings, juvenile detention, and residential treatment centers for children. She specializes in working with children and adults with learning challenges or neurologic injuries. Dr. Furey currently maintains a private practice and believes in a treatment approach based on limiting toxic exposures from medications, vaccines, food, and the environment. She believes in the sacredness of the family and the need to protect children from societal assaults on their innocence.  In 2021, in the midst of Covid, she gathered with other healthcare providers and concerned citizens to form the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance.  This organization seeks to restore the right to medical freedom by ensuring informed consent, bodily sovereignty, and the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship. Check out the VAMFA, whether you’re a Virginian or not- excellent material here: https://vamfa.org VAMFA Rumble Channel: https://rumble.com/c/VAMFA Watch and listen to The Feds on any of these platforms:  https://taplink.cc/fedsforfreedom Support the Work and Become a Member of Feds For Freedom www.fedsforfreedom.org/join Follow Us on Social Media Instagram/X (Twitter)/Facebook:  @feds4freedomusa creators.spotify.com
Evidence over Ideology: Gender-Distressed Children Deserve Nothing Less When it comes to children’s health, ideology should never override evidence. Children who are distressed about their biological sex need evidence-based care that facilitates their journey to adulthood, keeping them mentally and physically intact. thepublicdiscourse.com
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 5:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am appalled that Westland Middle School taught a lesson on LGBTQIA+ to sixth graders. I see it as propaganda from mentally unwell teachers. They discussed how people know if they are a girl or boy. They are who they were born as; anything else is evil and aims to undermine families. This must stop; we did not vote for radical left propaganda pushed on our children.

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

DISGUSTING: Westland Middle School was BUSTED for giving an entire lesson on LGBTQIA+ to SIXTH GRADERS! This is exactly the kind of propaganda that gets pushed on children by mentally unwell "teachers." The topics covered things like: "How do people know if they are a 'girl' or 'boy'?" This is SIMPLE. They are whatever they were BORN AS. Anything else being pushed on them is evil and seeks to further undermine and destabilize children and their families. This has to STOP! We did NOT vote to have radical left propaganda shoved down our children's throats.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Serena and Joe Wales, two parents from Colorado, are suing a local school district after alleging their 11-year-old daughter was forced to share a room with a transgender student during an overnight field trip two years ago. The daughter was told she would be rooming with three female students, but one of them was a transgender girl. The daughter called her mother—who was serving as a chaperone at the event—and was later moved to a different room, with instructions not to discuss the reason. The Wells’ family joined as part of a case brought on behalf of four families. The couple initially tried to address the issue with the school district directly but felt unheard, ultimately turning to legal action two years after the incident. They say the case was dismissed by a Biden-appointed judge, Regina Rodriguez, with prejudice in August, who ruled that while parents may have the right to instill moral and religious values, they do not have the right to replace public education with their own personal views or to control every aspect of their children’s education. The Wells say the decision left them frustrated and indicates a broader concern that parents are excluded from information and decision-making about school policies. The case has now been appealed to the Tenth Circuit. Attorney Matt Sharp, senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, represents the Wells and the other families. He explains that the plaintiffs want parental rights protected, for parents to be informed about policies, and for their requests—such as not having their child share a room with a transgender student—to be honored. The plaintiffs argue that the school district should respect girls’ privacy and protect parental rights, and they seek to have the policy enjoined and ultimately changed. During the discussion, Sharp notes additional concerns raised by another family in the suit: a boy was forced to share a cabin with a girl for an entire week, with a girl assigned to monitor the boys during showers, dressing, and changing. The Wells emphasize that this incident and others represent privacy violations affecting multiple children and highlight a perceived need for parental involvement in policy decisions. Serena, Joe, and Matt express that this case is a matter of parental rights, school transparency, and protecting students’ privacy. They say the issue relates to broader debates about opt-out rights and parental involvement in education. The conversation concludes with the expectation that the case will be closely watched at the Tenth Circuit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is wild. Two parents are really, really mad. So mad they're suing a Colorado school district after they say it tried to force their 11 year old daughter to share a bed with a biological male during an overnight field trip two years ago. Joe and Serena Whales said that they were told that she'd be sharing a room with three female students, but one of them was actually a transgender. The daughter called her mom, who at the time was, at the same time serving at chaperone of the event. The daughter eventually got to switch rooms, but was told not to discuss why. So her parents sued the school district, but the case was initially dismissed by a Biden appointed judge. Now it's being appealed to the tenth circuit. Here with me exclusively are those parents, Serena and Joe Wales, and their attorney Matt Sharp, senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom. Serena, I remember when this first happened, I believe we covered it. So how why was your daughter told not to discuss why she was being moved? Speaker 1: Originally, they said that because they wanted to protect the privacy of the other students. And our thoughts are, well, what about the privacy of our daughter? But initially, that's exactly why Speaker 0: she didn't deserve any privacy. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Well and and to your husband, as a father of a daughter, especially, I I can't frankly imagine my reaction to this. It probably wouldn't have been as genteel as yours going to court. But did you try to make, you know, make it known to the school early on before this lawsuit that this was not this was completely wrong? And what was their initial response? Speaker 2: We didn't talk to the school after this. We we looked at the different options, and we felt like the best course was taking legal action to make a difference. There's several issues going on within the Jefco schools where we didn't feel like we'd be heard. We didn't feel like we'd get anywhere by talking directly to the school or even to the district. We felt like we needed to do something to really take a bigger action. We felt like, know, we're two years into this now, so it's definitely been a grind. Speaker 0: This is Speaker 2: But we like, we made the right choice. Speaker 0: This is just insanity. I just did this whole angle on how the family is under attack by the culture, society, education, woke educators. And, Matt, you know, this case was brought on behalf of four families. What sort of relief are you hoping for? You you looking for just, you know, the school to change policies? Is there damages here? And if so, what are they? Speaker 3: Yeah. We want parental rights protected. We want parents to be informed about bad policies like this, and we want their request to be honored. When they ask schools, don't force our daughter to share a room with a boy. The school needs to honor that. It needs to respect parents. It needs needs to protect girls' privacy. So we wanna see this policy enjoined and ultimately changed. Speaker 0: But is there are there damages that the parents here are claiming because of what the girl was told? Speaker 3: Well, the the real damage is the the violation of the girl's privacy, and not just the Wells' daughter, but in one of the other families, their boy was forced to share a cabin with a girl for an entire week where this girl was assigned to monitor the boys when they were showering, dressing changing. So there is damage to these kids, to their privacy rights, and ultimately, parental rights as well. Mhmm. Speaker 0: This is completely insane. I can't even believe we're doing this segment. Now, Serena, a Biden appointed judge dismissed that original, filing with prejudice back in August, but judge, Regina Rodriguez wrote in that ruling, while parents may have the right to instill moral and religious values in their children, parents have no right to replace public education with their own personal views nor a right to control each and every aspect of their children's education, etcetera, etcetera. What does that make you feel like as a parent when your tax dollars are going to support that attitude? Speaker 1: It makes me angry because this this is a parental rights issue. Schools and parents should be joining each other in order to do what's best for their children. And when when the school district hides information from us, it doesn't allow us parents to be part of that conversation, and then it puts our kids in in risk situations that we could have resolved before all of this even happened. Speaker 0: When it came to the curriculum issue, the supreme court said earlier this year that parents must be given essentially a right to opt out of this, and you all should have been given at the very least a right to opt out of this before they ever got Mhmm. As far as it did. Serena, Joe, Matt, we'll be watching this case very closely at the tenth circuit. Thank you very much.
Saved - December 16, 2025 at 3:33 PM

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

The public school system is designed to indoctrinate children into: -CRT (Critical Race Theory) -Gender ideology -Climate ideology -Feminism, & -Atheism & everyday more parents realize that if you want to protect your child from the woke mind virus you have to start young. https://t.co/U6w2AtWNfz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the crooked foundation of the public school system makes university indoctrination possible, asserting that everything in school is filtered through a Marxist lens of oppressed versus oppressors. The speaker claims schools introduce gender ideology, with opponents framed as intolerant; introduce critical race theory, with opponents framed as racist; introduce feminism, with opponents labeled misogynist or part of the patriarchy; and introduce socialism, with opponents described as privileged. The speaker contends that this influence is often subtle rather than overt, embedded in curriculum. An example given is how slavery is taught in elementary school. The speaker acknowledges general agreement that slavery was bad but argues that curricula omit broader historical context. Specifically, they state that The United States banned slavery in seven states while the rest of the world had bans in seven countries; in seventeen seventy six, 92–95% of the world was actively practicing slavery and it was the norm on every continent. The speaker also notes that Thomas Jefferson tried to get slavery abolished in the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, that England abolished slavery in 1833, the United States in 1865, and that the rest of the world followed that example in Africa and Asia. The claim is that within proper historical context, the American story is one of liberation. The speaker asserts that the Marxist lens requires the oppressed versus the oppressors, and that if these arguments were made in school, a student would be failed, shamed in front of the class, and possibly sent to the principal’s office. The claim is that the system is designed to keep America divided so it could be easily conquered. Addressing critics, the speaker mentions the Frankfurt School, stating it expanded the ideas of Marxism, developed the oppressed-versus-oppressor framework, and aimed to use race, gender, and sexuality to usher in cultural Marxism. The speaker contends this infiltration began in academia in the nineteen-sixties, and attributes today’s situation to those developments. Note: Promotional content at the end has been omitted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone worries about the university indoctrination that happens up here, but it is the crooked foundation of the public school system that makes university indoctrination possible. Everything in school is filtered through the Marxist lens of oppressed versus oppressors. So schools introduce gender ideology and anyone who's against it is framed as intolerant. They introduce critical race theory and anyone who's against it is framed as racist. School introduces feminism and if you go against it you're a misogynist or part of the patriarchy. And they introduce socialism, and anyone who's against that is privileged. Now more often than not, in fact, most of the time, this isn't happening overtly, but it's subtly embedded into curriculum. So for example, when they teach about slavery, and they do this in elementary school, they teach that The US had slavery, that people were stolen from their homes, that there was abuse, mistreatment. And we all know this. Everyone agrees that slavery was a really bad thing and there shouldn't be slavery. But they don't teach that The United States had banned slavery in seven states when the rest of the world had only banned it in seven countries. So in seventeen seventy six, ninety to 95% of the world was actively practicing slavery, and this was the norm on every continent. And in spite of this, Thomas Jefferson tried to get slavery abolished in the original draft of the Declaration of Independence. And in 1833, England abolished slavery, The United States did in 1865, and the rest of the world followed that example. Africa, Asia. So within proper historical context, the American story is one of liberation. But the Marxist lens requires the oppressed versus the oppressors. So if you were to make these arguments in school, you would be failed, shamed in front of the class, and probably sent to the principal's office. Because this is designed to keep America divided so that we could be easily conquered. And to all the Marxists who love to tell me that I'm wrong, you really need to look up the Frankfurt School as it expanded the ideas of Marxism, developed the oppressed versus oppressor framework, Its aim was to use race, gender, and sexuality to usher in cultural Marxism. It started infiltrating academia in the nineteen sixties. And the result is what you see today. And our kids and our country deserve so much better. Check out my private homeschool community and cubs to bears books. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - April 15, 2023 at 3:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US Navy is advising sailors to discuss gender identity, sex, STDs, and pregnancy with their children at age 12 without notifying parents. When asked if this policy circumvents parental rights, an official answered yes. A Navy Nurse Practitioner suggested that parents not accepting the trans agenda is the reason for suicides. It is unclear if this policy is forced on all branches of the military. The government is accused of grooming children of service members into Marxist ideologies.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

This week in Bahrain the Navy told sailors that they talk to their children at age 12 about gender identity, sex, STD’s, pregnancy, etc. without notifying parents. When asked if "the Navy’s policy circumvents a parents right to know?" the @USNavy official answered "Yes". Insane.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

This clip is one of the more infuriating parts of this. Navy Nurse Practitioner Nichole Benson seems to be saying that parents not being accepting of the trans agenda is the reason for suicides. This is the emotional manipulation used to get parents on board with transitions. She then admits that the @USNavy circumvents parental rights. This is beyond unacceptable. We demand answers and a policy change ASAP from the Navy. The government is actively engaged in grooming the children of our service members into Marxist ideologies.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

I’m currently investigating if this policy is one that the @DeptofDefense forced on all branches of the military. If you’re in the Army, Marines, Space Force, Air Force or National Guard: Ask about the Navy policy to see if your branch has the same policy. DM me if you record it.

View Full Interactive Feed