reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Jikkyleaks
Posted - February 2, 2023 at 8:13 PM
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 7:09 PM

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Even people who can see that everything about the COVID origins story was a lie can't see that the absolute clincher to maintain the lie was to remove antibiotics from post-viral protocols in the elderly. HCQ and IVM were bystanders. #3tablets.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

@jimmy_dore No question officials were lying flagrantly about the danger of COVID and the efficacy of vaccines. But from all the evidence I’ve seen, I don’t believe Ivermectin, HCQ, and other “early treatment” drugs are effective. I see them as a scam.

TwinTowerCity
Posted - June 15, 2023 at 6:23 AM
Saved - June 16, 2023 at 1:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump's use of Operation Warp Speed forced the Cabal to release their bioweapon injections early, preventing a 10-year lockdown and economic collapse. The Cabal's plan to cull the population was thwarted due to lack of supply and improper storage, resulting in many receiving placebo shots. Trump also exposed corrupt players like Fauci and Gates, making it difficult for the Cabal to pull off another plandemic. Those who received the injections are experiencing strange side effects, while pureblood individuals remain unaffected. The spike protein is the bioweapon.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

THREAD: Why President Trump Pushed the "Vaccine" President Trump used Operation Warp Speed to force the Cabal to deploy their bioweapon injections before they were fully prepared. If he hadn't done this, the following would have happened:

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

He would have been labeled an enemy of the people by the Democrats and fake news media for not providing a "vaccine”. They would have impeached him again.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're sending most of the product to the Senate, including some additions like hearing and family medical aid. Bernie loves hearing, but some are against it. We're also focused on privileged scrub, as it can be detrimental to the bill. We want to avoid messaging bills and ensure what we send is not birdable or birdbath. We're receiving positive feedback and there's no bad answer. This legislation is a monumental historic piece that we're proud to be a part of.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're Speaker 1: we're, you know, we're this shouldn't take long to get. The other thing that we're getting are we're sending stuff over to the senate. Well, most of the product that we've done is set now we we may have added in the last day or so, and some of what we added is senate to the bill, like, hearing. Bernie doesn't like hearing excuse me. Bernie loves hearing. Mention doesn't want hearing in the bill, unless so some is senate oriented and then we have the family medical aid. We figured if they're putting things in, then we can put something in, even if management doesn't like it. So we are getting some bird and privilege. I think I think mostly we're getting privileged scrub, because privileged drug is deadliest to a bill. Birdable is important. It's you have to take it out. But privilege violation can take you out. So so we're again getting that as we go along as well. About when we pass a bill, then they will see it in its aggregate and make, some Any Speaker 0: concerns that any of this is quote messaging because that they have to take some of those things out regardless no matter what you sent over. You said you weren't going to send a a messaging bill. Speaker 1: No. No. We're gonna send a message in your bill, but we, wanna be sure that what we send is not birdable or birdbath or privilege scrub. They're the 2 exercises. We're engaged bathing exercises we're engaged in, and, we're getting good response. There's no bad answer. You know, it is what it is. You know, there's certain objectivity to it. It is what it is. Because whatever it is, this is the greatest monumental historic piece of legislation, that any of us have will ever be a part of it.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

We’d still be in lockdown with muzzle mandates. The Cabal planned to lock us down for 10+ years. The economy would have been destroyed. Millions more would have died through food shortages and depression.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

After ten years, when millions had already died from lockdowns, the jabs would have been released and made mandatory. It would have been forcibly injected at gunpoint into a depressed, sick, and demoralized population. Instead, the Cabal was forced to release early under EUA.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

The shots would have deadlier. The Cabal wants to cull global population to 500M per Georgia Guidestones. By releasing early, they lacked supply and cold storage to kill the planned number of people. Instead, many people got placebo, or inactive mRNA due to improper storage.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

Remember, Trump told us from the beginning that the virus came from a lab in China. He explained what it was, and he ensured we were aware of the benefits of HCQ, Zinc, Ivermectin, and Regeneron. He told us about these treatments months before the bioweapon shots were deployed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I will not be referring to this virus as the Chinese virus. It is not racist. It comes from China.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Keep calling this the Chinese virus. I don't won't be calling this the China. I won't be calling this the Chinese virus. It's not racist at all. No. Not at all. China. It's not racist at all. No. Not at all. It comes from China.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

Hydroxychloroquine is a synthetic form of Quinine. Quinine has been used to treat colds and flus since the 1800s. HCQ and Quinine are a zinc ionophores. They help zinc enter cells, preventing viruses from replicating. They work like a preventative 'vaccine' as well as a cure.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

President Trump also placed people like Fauci, Birx, Gates, Biden, Soros, Schwab, and Big Pharma in the spotlight, exposing their corruption to the world. It will be impossible for the Cabal to pull off another plandemic, as very few people trust these corrupt players now.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccinated individuals are protected against COVID-19 and its variants, as the vaccines are highly effective. They do not carry the virus, get sick, or transmit it to others. Vaccination allows society to return to normal. Fully vaccinated people no longer need to wear masks or practice physical distancing, and they are unlikely to be hospitalized or die from the virus. However, vaccines only slightly reduce transmission, and there is a need for new vaccination strategies. Reports from Israel suggest a waning of immunity, indicating the importance of booster shots. The plan is for every adult to receive a booster shot.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Speaker 2: These vaccines are highly, highly effective. Speaker 3: Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Speaker 2: They're really, really good against variants. Speaker 0: Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. Speaker 3: Get your 1st shot, and when you're due for your high. Speaker 0: Our key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on However, Speaker 2: when people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Speaker 1: If you're vaccinated, you're not gonna be hospitalized, high You're not gonna be in ICU unit, and you're not gonna die. If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask. Speaker 3: High. Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without Wearing a mask or physical distancing. But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission. Speaker 0: You know, we didn't have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines to help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce transmissions. We need a new new way of doing the vaccine. Speaker 2: The level of virus in the nasopharynx of a person who's vaccinated and infected is the same level high as the level of virus in the nasal variance of an unvaccinated person. Speaker 3: Reports from our international colleagues, including Israel, high. Suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early. Speaker 2: And if you look at Israel Mhmm. Which has always been a month ahead of us. They are seeing a waning of immunity, not only against infection, high. But against hospitalizations and, to some extent, death, a booster might actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have. Speaker 1: The plan is for every every adult to get a booster shot.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

In summary, President Trump was placed in a difficult situation. People were going to die whatever he did. But his course of action ultimately saved billions of lives globally. And when he is reelected, he will deliver retribution. Nuremberg 2.0 is coming.

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

Another important point. Almost half of the country remains pureblood. Anyone heard of a pureblood with long COVID? The sudden deaths, aggressive cancers, Guillain-Barre syndrome, strange blood clots etc. only seem to happen to people who got injected. https://t.co/hacZ7rH5wo

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

The Seal is Broken. Pandora's Box is Open. https://t.co/GgJ8TwPHtm

@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐

The Spike Protein is the Bioweapon https://t.co/Ufz3W5yeF7

leslibless
Posted - August 11, 2023 at 5:44 PM
Saved - August 11, 2023 at 9:08 PM

@leslibless - 🇺🇸ProudArmyBrat

“A $200 million enterprise would’ve collapsed if Fauci would’ve admitted Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were effective against covid.” These meds only cost $3.00! They didn’t make Big Pharm any profits! So many lives lost!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tony Fauci's problem is that a federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an approved medication that is effective against the target disease. If Fauci had acknowledged the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin against COVID, it would have been illegal to approve the vaccines. The medical community, including 17,000 doctors, supported the use of these medications, but Fauci dismissed them as dangerous. It is speculated that Fauci had a strong incentive to discredit these medications. Many doctors, such as Harvey Reach, Peter McCulloch, and Pierre Corey, who have successfully treated COVID patients, believe that hundreds of thousands of American lives could have been saved if these medications were not suppressed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tony Fauci's problem is this. There's a little known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine. If there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease. So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin are effective against COVID. It would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorizations to the vaccines and they could never have gotten them approved. And I would have been, you know, a 200,000,000,000 enterprise that would have collapsed. Speaker 1: That is fascinating. I mean, I I have been covering this very closely now for all of the 2 years. That's the first I've heard that that I mean, I in your book. So he would not have gotten emergency use authorization for the vaccine if it if the medical community had been saying Ivermectin works. It is an effective treatment for COVID. Speaker 0: Well, the medical community, a lot of it was saying matter. I mean, there's 17,000 doctors who signed a petition and there are so many peer reviewed publications now that consistently say that, but he had aggressively crusade against it to kind of drown out those reports by saying it's a hoarder's medication. It's, you know, people are taking it and it's dangerous and it's overdosing people. And, you Speaker 1: know, use Why do he why do he keep saying it after he got his authorization? Speaker 0: Well, 1, even if you have the emergency use authorization, it is it The law appears to say you can't have it anymore if there's a functioning medication. Oh, you know, that may be why. Again, I try not to look in his head, but I do. There's a very, very strong incentive Urhang to kill Iramax and hydroxychloroquine. And, you know, there there many doctors, including Harvey Reach, at Yale as one of the leading, bio statisticians, epidemiologists in the world. Peter McCulloch, who is the most published, doctor in the history of the world and his specialty. Pierre, Corey, these doctors who have treated tens of thousands of, of COVID patients successfully, they consistently say, and the science supports this that half a 1000000 Americans did not need to die.
louisaclary
Posted - August 14, 2023 at 6:02 PM
Saved - August 15, 2023 at 6:21 PM

@louisaclary - Louisa Clary

Remember when HCQ was trashed by Fauci, public health officials & the media? All due to a Lancet study that was found to be fraudulent & retracted? "The authors completely escaped any serious ramifications for their fraud…until now." Read:https://brokentruth.com/sapan-desai-ohio/ Fauci & CNBC

Fraud Doctor Warned by Ohio Medical Board Fraud Doctor Warned by Ohio Medical Board brokentruth.com

@CNBC - CNBC

White House coronavirus advisor Dr. Fauci says that all the “valid” scientific data shows hydroxychloroquine isn’t effective in treating Covid-19. https://cnb.cx/3g6deal

Dr. Fauci says all the 'valid' scientific data shows hydroxychloroquine isn't effective in treating coronavirus White House coronavirus advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said that all the "valid" scientific data shows hydroxychloroquine isn't effective in treating Covid-19 cnbc.com
RenzTom
Posted - September 4, 2023 at 4:25 PM
Saved - September 4, 2023 at 4:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Gates and his associates allegedly discredited ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to promote mRNA vaccines. The law states that an EUA can't be issued if there are approved alternatives. Corruption is suspected. Trust in the safety and efficacy of the vaccines is urged. #COVID19 #Vaccines #Corruption

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

The reason that Bill Gates and his Big Pharma & WEF buddies had to get Fauci & crew to claim ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine did not work for COVID was because if they did then they could not authorize the modRNA/mRNA vaccines. 21 USC 360bbb-3 is the controlling law & it says you cannot issue an EUA unless: “(3) that there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating such disease or condition;. Corruption that led to death - but just trust them that the jabs are safe and effective right? #BillGates #BigPharma #WEF #Fauci #Ivermectin #HCQ #COVID #Vaccines #modRNA #mRNA @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @charliekirk11 @KanekoaTheGreat @RealCandaceO @GenFlynn @P_McCulloughMD @joerogan @TuckerCarlson @elonmusk @EmeraldRobinson @RobertKennedyJr @SteveDeaceShow @RMConservative @dbongino @BusyDrT @NeputeWellness @drscottjensen

CKellyUAP
Posted - September 6, 2023 at 1:27 AM
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 2:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Peter McCullough reveals a shocking incident in Australia. Billionaire Clive Palmer generously acquired a supply of hydroxychloroquine for the entire continent, but Australian authorities seized and destroyed it. This act, driven by the fear of hydroxychloroquine's potential, protected the profits of global elites at the cost of countless lives denied access to the drug. The truth behind this suppression threatens the credibility of Covid vaccines.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

Dr. Peter McCullough : "You can't believe this you know I spent time with billionaire Clive Palmer in Australia. Do you know he bought a supply of hydroxychloroquine for the entire continent, entire continent, free hydroxychloroquine? And do you know what, the Australian authorities seized it and they destroyed it." The Liberal government aided and abetted criminals whom were desperate to stop Hydroxychloroquine, because if the truth was known, the Covid ‘vaccines’ would have never have been able to obtain emergency use authorisation. Hydroxychloroquine threatened hundreds of billions in profits for the global elites - therefore Hydroxychloroquine had to be vilified & destroyed - no matter how many people died because they were denied access to it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hydroxychloroquine was initially praised for its potential in reducing COVID-19 symptoms and hospitalizations. However, it soon faced widespread criticism worldwide. In Australia, billionaire Clive Palmer purchased a large supply of hydroxychloroquine for the entire continent, intending to distribute it for free. Unfortunately, the Australian authorities seized and destroyed the medication.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Symptoms and actually reducing the need for hospitalization and oxygen supports. I mean, that was incredible. That's just for starters. Then, as things unfolded, many know hydroxychloroquine was slammed all over the world, not just in the United States. But Craig, you can't believe this. You know, I spent time with billionaire Clive Palmer in Australia, you know, he bought he bought a supply of hydroxychloroquine for the entire continent, entire continent, free hydroxychloroquine. And you know what? The Australian authority seized it and they destroyed it.
Con_Justice
Posted - September 23, 2023 at 2:18 PM
Saved - October 2, 2023 at 7:28 PM

@Con_Justice - Conservative Justice

They knew Ivermectin was the answer to a coronavirus outbreak. They had done the research in advance. Then they kept it from the public in favour of lockdowns, masks, and gene therapies. Follow for more!

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2002-2003, North American science conducted experiments and research on the original SARS CoV-one. By 2015-2016, it was known that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were effective against viruses and could modulate the immune response. DARPA, the American Research Arm of the U.S. Military, recommended Ivermectin to the CDC as the top product for a coronavirus pandemic. These medications have been used safely in humans for 35 to 40 years. So, when the next pandemic hit, Ivermectin was ready to be used.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Important thing to realize is that North American science spent 15 years figuring out what to do with the next COVID. It was back 2002, 2003, the original SARS CoV-one occurred. And so all sorts of experiments And the research was done. It was research was all done by 2015, 2016. And DARPA, DARPA, the American Research Arm of the U. S. Military, It specifically knew and specifically recommended and passed the information on to the CDC that Ivermectin, in particular, was the absolute number one product to be used in the event of a coronavirus pandemic. It was fully known that Ivermectin and certainly hydroxychloroquine as well were highly antiviral and immune modulatory. And those 2 things were the key, to modulate the immune response plus to the antiviral as well. Those elements were both totally proven in vitro and in vivo with animals so that it was known and of course, we knew it was completely safe for humans because these medications have been used for 35 to 40 years in humans. And so that's what was sitting there ready to be used at the next pandemic.
JakeCan72
Posted - September 24, 2023 at 5:56 AM
Saved - September 24, 2023 at 9:56 PM

@JakeCan72 - Jake

Covering their tracks: Mayo Clinic now says that Hydroxychloroquine should be used to treat Covid. Ivermectin and HCQ work now that the EUA is gone for the vax.

DschlopesIsBack
Posted - September 24, 2023 at 9:51 PM
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 1:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Rick Bright falsely claimed there was no evidence of hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness against the virus. Dr. Robert Malone, on Joe Rogan's podcast, revealed how Bright, Janet Woodcock, and others intentionally sabotaged its use for early Covid-19 treatment. #Misinformation #Covid19

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

"He (Rick Bright) states that the reason (for sabotaging HCQ) was that he believed there was no evidence of hydroxychloroquine being useful for this virus. Now that's false." Dr. Robert Malone with Joe Rogan discussing the Zelenko Protocol by Dr. Vladimir "Zev" Zelenko. He outlines how Bright, Janet Woodcock and others intentionally sabotaged hydroxychloroquine to prevent it from being used for early treatment of Covid-19.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zev Zelenko, the creator of the Zelenko protocol and advocate for Hydroxychloroquine, has made a video exposing a conspiracy between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright. Rick Bright, former head of BARDA, and Janet Woodcock, former head of Operation Warp Speed for Drugs and the FDA, allegedly conspired to restrict the use of Hydroxychloroquine to hospitals only. This strategy, implemented through emergency use authorization, hindered the timely administration of the drug. The motive behind their actions remains unclear. Rick Bright himself admitted to this conspiracy on video, claiming there was no evidence of Hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness against the virus, which is false.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Zev Zelenko, who's a buddy, the guy that came out with the original protocol, the Zelenko protocol, and was the one by the way that wrote the letter to, to Trump advocating for Hydroxychloroquine. Okay. Kind of important to put that together. He's put together a great little video clip in which he clearly documents the conspiracy between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright to make it so that physicians could not administer Hydroxychloroquine outside of the hospital. And who is Janet Woodcock and who's Rick Bright? Rick Bright was the head of BARDA of BARDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research Directorate, which is the group that, for instance, funded the J and J vaccine and Operation Warp Speed, etcetera. So they're the big ticket funder in health and human service of biodefense products. And who is she? Janet Woodcock, was head of Operation Warp Speed for Drugs and until very recently, head of the FDA. She is known as the person who kind of gets the credit, let's say, for the opioid crisis, for her role at the FDA. So between the 2 of them, was there was some sort of a concerted effort To suppress the use of Hydroxychloroquine? Rick Bright in in videotaped testimony has explicitly spoken about how they conspired to cook an a strategy using emergency use authorization to make it so that Hydroxychloroquine could only be administered in the hospital, which by the way is too late for when hydroxy should be used. And why do they do that? That is what is the unknown and and there's so many whys and hows behind this. I like to say there's a stack of stuff that doesn't make sense that's about this high. Now there is I can't prove, I can't get into Rick's head, I know Rick quite well. I don't know what he's currently working for the Rockefeller. He did a whistleblower case and then he left the government. But all I know is they did this and Rick admits on it on video tape that he did it. And, and he states that the reason was is that he believed there was no evidence of Hydroxychloroquine being useful for this virus. Now that's false.
Inversionism
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 9:23 PM
Saved - October 3, 2023 at 3:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the COVID pandemic, the US government acquired the global supply of remdesivir, despite its harmful effects and lack of effectiveness. They targeted doctors who advocated for safer alternatives and even restricted the use of vitamin C. This was driven by profit, as remdesivir was expensive and boosted COVID mortality rates. The government's actions reflect a disturbing level of malice and disregard for human health. Their profiteering resulted in immense harm and loss of life.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

This is how we know that there was malice and forethought during the COVID pandemic. The US government bought up nearly the ENTIRE world supply of remdesivir in mid 2020. Nearly all of it, which is so insane considering what we know now with it's kidney nuking capacity and complete lack of efficacy. Then they took extreme actions towards doctors who were trying cheaper and safer alternative treatments by going as far as removing their license and ability to practice medicine. They even banned doctors from using vitamin C of all things... They only wanted people to use the severely toxic remdesivir because it was a cash cow for pharma at nearly $2000 per course of treatment, in addition to it being great at ensuring COVID mortality was exacerbated to pad the numbers and keep up the narrative of how deadly it was to further sell the vaccine. Idk how anyone can look back on the sequence of actions taken by the government and pharma from early 2020 until now with the continual shilling of boosters, and not see gross levels of malice with forethought. Beginning to end, it was completely anti-human, anti-health, anti-science, and absurdly pro-pharma in every way imaginable. They made billions off the willful harm and death of so many people.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US has purchased the majority of the world's supply of remdesivir, a drug that helps COVID-19 patients recover. This has caused concern as it limits access to the drug for the rest of the world. Remdesivir has been shown to reduce hospitalization time by about 4 days but does not reduce the risk of death. Another effective drug is the steroid dexamethasone, which costs significantly less. The NHS has enough remdesivir for current patients, but the duration of supply is uncertain. A doctor shares his frustration with the hospital system, claiming that they interfered with his ability to treat COVID-19 patients with other safe and effective drugs. He believes hospitals have become dangerous places for patients.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United States has struck a deal to buy almost the entire world's supply of a drug that's known to help people recover from COVID nineteen. In trials carried out in the UK as well as elsewhere, remdesivir was cutting the time needed in a hospital for the most seriously ill by about 4 days. It's one of only 2 drugs known to be effective in treating the virus, as our medical correspondent, Fergus Walsh, explains. Speaker 1: Geraldine from North London is one of more than a 1000 COVID patients who took part in a global trial of Remdesivir. This is her receiving the drug in April. She made a rapid recovery and is shocked that the drug has been bought up by the US. Speaker 2: I wanted to be part of something that could potentially help everyone, and I feel that now only a small percentage of the world's population, really, are going to receive any benefit from it in the in the near future. It's really disappointing. Speaker 1: Remdesivir takes months to manufacture, So there was already a shortage. This deal means the American pharma company, Gilead, will reserve nearly all production Speaker 3: COVID is a global problem with millions of patients affected worldwide. Those patients need access to proven treatments. For 1 country to dominate the access to a single treatment is beyond unfortunate. Speaker 1: There are now 2 drugs which have proven to be effective against COVID nineteen, Remdesivir and the steroid Dexamethasone. Remdesivir costs 1900 per course of treatment, whereas Dexamethasone costs just £5. Remdesivir cuts the duration of symptoms from 15 to 11 days, But it's not proven to reduce the risk of dying, whereas dexamethasone cuts the risk of dying by a third in the most seriously ill patients. The NHS says it has enough remdesivir For patients who currently need it, but how long that will last is unclear. But there are ample supplies of dexamethasone, which is now the standard treatment for seriously ill COVID patients. Fergus Voorhees BBC News. Speaker 4: What's happening now is completely unprecedented in the history of medicine and across the world. We have the federal government. We have state agencies and hospitals telling doctors how to practice medicine. They're interfering with the sacred patient physician relationship. They are telling doctors to be doctors. So I can tell you what happened to me. So I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a whole host of repurposed drugs. I then this is a memo. This is a memo sent to the entire health care system, but they targeted me personally. And what did this memo say? This said I can use remdesivir. And then I will quote. There was an added section. Do not endorse section, which includes medications that may cause harm and efficacy, is not supported in peer reviewed published RCTs. These medications will not be verified or dispensed for the prevention or treatment of COVID. This list includes Ivermectin, Picalutamide, Etoxacryloboxamine, Dutasteride and finasteride. And then just to stick it to me, they added ascorbic acid. Speaker 5: Otherwise known as Otherwise known as Speaker 4: system was effectively preventing me treating My patients according to my best clinical judgment. And then how did this progress, I objected. So the 1st week I was in ICU, I don't know what to do. What was I to do? My hands were tied. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I could not treat patients the way I had to be to treat patients. I had 7 COVID patients, including a 31 year old woman. I was not allowed to treat these people. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people die. I didn't try to sue the system. And you know what they did? They did something called peer sham review. It is a disgusting and evil concept. They then accused me of 7 most outrageous crimes that I had committed And that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients, they immediately suspended my hospital privileges because I possessed I posed such an outright threat To these patients, ignoring the fact that under my care, the mortality was 50%, those of my colleagues. I then went on through the sham peer review. I I went to a kangaroo court where they continued this, and the end result was I lost my hospital privilege and was reported to the national practitioner at Databank. So here I was standing up for patients' rights, and this hospital, this evil hospital, ended my medical career. So that's what they do. It's an outright Outrage, it's evil to the core. Why? Why did they Speaker 5: do that? Just one second. Doctor. Mac, did any of those cases that you were reviewed on, Were they non COVID cases? Were they pneumococcal pneumonia cases or staph sepsis? Where you used a broad range of your clinical skills? Speaker 4: These were all patients with COVID. Speaker 5: So it was specific to COVID, Not any other condition where you would use your broad range of clinical skills. It was only on COVID Absolutely. That the review was applied, and it was Applied in a way that was basically expressing and advising therapeutic nihilism. Which means for the American public, therapeutic nihilism means the denial of treatment In patients in the This Speaker 4: is the document which was sent to the entire healthcare system, which is the COVID nineteen comprehensive treatment guideline, which specifically was targeted at me, Preventing me from prescribing safe, effective off label drugs. It's unprecedented in the history of medicine. The hospital is telling me how to practice medicine. They're denying me the right to use safe and effective drugs and lying because they claim who Speaker 5: can use safe, effective, off label drugs For other conditions outside COVID? Speaker 4: Absolutely. If this was pneumococcal pneumonia, this wouldn't be an issue. This is specifically for COVID. So let me ask the question. How has the hospital treatment of patients advanced, improved over the last 2 years. Sorry to continue. So it's a terrible thing for me to say. I'm an intensivist. I've worked in the ICU for 35 years. Hospitals have become dangerous places for sick people. Patients must do whatever they can to avoid the hospital. When they are imprisoned in a hospital, they deny their rights. They are not allowed a patient advocate. Their family are denied access to the patient. They are prisoners in the system. They have no rights and they get the treatment dictated by the hospital. There are dangerous places for sick people. And that's for me as a physician practicing hospital medicine for 40 years, saddens me to the core. Yes. There's 2.
iluminatibot
Posted - October 3, 2023 at 2:56 AM
Saved - October 3, 2023 at 8:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the COVID pandemic, the US government acquired the global supply of remdesivir, despite its harmful effects and lack of effectiveness. They targeted doctors who advocated for safer alternatives, even banning the use of vitamin C. This was to promote the toxic remdesivir, a lucrative cash cow for pharmaceutical companies. By inflating COVID mortality rates, they pushed the narrative of its severity and boosted vaccine sales. The government's actions reveal a disturbing level of premeditated malice.

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

This is how we know that there was malice and forethought during the COVID pandemic. The US government bought up nearly the ENTIRE world supply of remdesivir in mid 2020. Nearly all of it, which is so insane considering what we know now with it's kidney nuking capacity and complete lack of efficacy. Then they took extreme actions towards doctors who were trying cheaper and safer alternative treatments by going as far as removing their license and ability to practice medicine. They even banned doctors from using vitamin C of all things... They only wanted people to use the severely toxic remdesivir because it was a cash cow for pharma at nearly $2000 per course of treatment, in addition to it being great at ensuring COVID mortality was exacerbated to pad the numbers and keep up the narrative of how deadly it was to further sell the vaccine. I don't know how anyone can look back on the sequence of actions taken by the government and pharma from early 2020 until now with the continual shilling of boosters, and not see gross levels of malice with forethought.

VigilantFox
Posted - November 9, 2023 at 7:17 PM
Saved - November 10, 2023 at 12:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. McCullough reveals a concerning government crackdown on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Billionaire Clive Palmer's supply for Australia was seized and destroyed. These medications have excellent safety records, so why the opposition? Dr. McCullough questions why anyone would object to trying ivermectin, which has a safety profile even better than acetaminophen. Stay informed by following for more updates.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. McCullough: The Government Feared Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin Did you know that billionaire Clive Palmer procured an entire supply of hydroxychloroquine for the whole population of Australia? The governmental authorities seized it and destroyed it. Both HCQ and ivermectin have immaculate safety profiles. So why the government crackdown? Why would anybody care about ivermectin? asked @P_McCulloughMD. "It's got a safety profile better than acetaminophen. If it didn't work, but we wanted to give it a try, and people are willing to pay for it, why would anyone care?" Repost and follow for more newsworthy content. Related stories are in the thread below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the use of various drugs, including hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, colchicine, doxycycline, Azithromycin, budesonide, prednisone, and enoxaparin, for treating COVID-19. They mention that these drugs were considered lightning rods, particularly hydroxychloroquine, which faced strong opposition. The speaker questions why authorities would prevent the use of these drugs if they were not believed to be effective, and highlights the safety profile of Ivermectin. They suggest that people should be allowed to try these drugs if they are willing to pay for them. The motive behind targeting these drugs is unclear.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, the 2018 FDA guidance said doctors should use drugs off their original advertising labels when they are fulfilling an unmet medical need. That's exactly what we were doing with hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, colchicine, doxycycline, Azithromycin, budesonide, prednisone, enoxaparin. I mean, that's how we treat COVID. And that's exactly what we were doing. But there were certain drugs that were lightning rods. And the first one was hydroxychloroquine, where there was a crushing response that no one should receive hydroxychloroquine. I mean, it was extraordinary. Do do you know that billionaire Clive Palmer in Australia procured an entire supply of hydroxychloroquine for the the whole population of Australia. The governmental authorities seized it and destroyed it. Speaker 1: And why were they targeting that? Because if it was proven to be useful, And there would be no vaccine mandate. Speaker 0: It's hard to ascribe motive. But why not just let people use hydroxychloroquine? If government authorities or other doctors didn't think it would work, why would anybody care? Why would anybody care about Ivermectin has got a safety profile better than Acetaminophen. If it didn't work, but, you know, we wanted to give it a try and people are willing to pay for it, why would anyone care?
VigilantFox
Posted - November 28, 2023 at 11:00 AM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 1:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Peter McCullough accuses governments of intentionally suppressing early COVID-19 treatments to promote vaccines. He believes this was done to secure emergency use authorization for the vaccines. McCullough asserts that the lack of existing treatments was intentional, causing fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. He is a renowned cardiologist and a vocal critic of the COVID-19 shots. For more information, follow @P_McCulloughMD and check out related articles from @VigilantNews. Stay informed about the 'next pandemic' and be prepared.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. McCullough Accuses the Government of Intentionally Wanting to Harm Citizens Those who were suppressing early treatment were the same ones promoting the COVID-19 vaccines. Why? Because you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease. "Yes, governments intentionally wanted to harm their citizens all over the world all at once," asserted Dr. @P_McCulloughMD. "It [no existing treatment narrative] was intentional to create fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Governments worldwide intentionally suppressed early treatment for COVID-19, causing fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. This controversial narrative aimed to harm citizens simultaneously. Disturbingly, doctors in the Netherlands admitted to euthanizing seniors with lethal doses of morphine instead of treating the virus. Similar occurrences were reported in Africa and South America. The bizarre behavior observed globally during the pandemic was not limited to the United States.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Those who were suppressing early treatment were in this government narrative. And the government narrative, I am convinced, and I really outlined it in the book, was intentional. It was intentional to create fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. Yes. Governments intentionally wanted to harm their citizens all over the world all at once. Now that is a great controversy. How can all the minds think the same all at once? I had doctors in the Netherlands tell me that essentially they were, you know, committing euthanasia to seniors in the Netherlands. Instead of treating COVID, they were giving them lethal doses of morphine. The same thing was happening in, you know, in in the in the, jungles of Africa and South America. People started to behave incredibly bizarrely all over the world. It wasn't a US phenomenon.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Peter McCullough is an outspoken critic of the C19 shots and one of the most published cardiologists in the world. If you are not already doing so, give him a follow: --> @P_McCulloughMD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related stories from @VigilantNews (click images for articles: Dr. McCullough Testifies the Truth About COVID-19, mRNA Shots, and the WHO Before the European Parliament https://vigilantnews.com/post/dr-mccullough-testifies-the-truth-about-covid-19-mrna-shots-and-the-who-before-the-european-parliament

Dr. McCullough Testifies the Truth About COVID-19, mRNA Shots, and the WHO Before the European Parliament It's time to pull out from the World Health Organization. Dr. McCullough explains why. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Dr. Peter McCullough reveals more bad news about the COVID shots. https://vigilantnews.com/post/dr-mccullough-reveals-more-bad-news-about-the-covid-shots

Dr. McCullough Reveals More Bad News About the COVID Shots “They [COVID shots] should be off the market completely.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews The 'next pandemic': what you need to do to be ready. https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-next-pandemic-what-you-need-to-do-to-be-ready

The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready “You’ve seen all the threats from the establishment suggesting that there’s not going to be drug availability in the not-too-distant future ... So, look at that and protect yourselves.” vigilantnews.com
iluminatibot
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 7:45 AM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 9:41 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

A $200 billion enterprise would've collapsed if Fauci had admitted that Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were effective against Covid. I'd call them criminal but these people are much worse.

CKellyUAP
Posted - December 16, 2023 at 5:57 AM
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 8:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author believes that there was a deliberate effort to discredit and destroy the effectiveness of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They argue that acknowledging their effectiveness would have jeopardized the lucrative vaccine industry and exposed politicians as frauds.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

IVERMECTIN : FOLLOW THE MONEY They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. They didn’t care how many people they killed. Because if they had acknowledged that Ivermectin or HCQ was effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed. And the politicians that wanted to claim glory for "saving everyone" with a free injection would have been exposed as frauds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, a group of doctors discuss the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Some doctors argue that Ivermectin is a safe and effective drug that has shown miraculous effectiveness in treating the virus. They cite studies and the endorsement of a senior immunologist to support their claims. However, other doctors disagree, stating that the studies are still undergoing peer review and that Ivermectin is not an approved treatment for COVID-19. They argue that the vaccines have emergency use authorization because there are no approved alternatives. The debate centers around the effectiveness and credibility of Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before. Speaker 1: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw a doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, safe, and effective drug for the application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 0: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ICU doctors, collectively, were some of the most highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 1: As we sit here today. I'm the most published person in my field in history. Speaker 2: To this because I mean, you're the only person saying this. We've got a listen to our doctors and our scientists. Speaker 3: So Ivermectin is a drug which has been dispensed 3,700,000,000 times. It's changed the face of parasitic diseases on this planet. It's probably the 2nd most important drug ever invented. It is very safe. It's very cheap, And it's highly effective against SARS CoV 2. Speaker 2: I don't even wanna get into this because, I mean, you're the only person saying this. We've gotta listen to our doctors And our scientists Speaker 4: I am a physician and a man of science. I have done nothing nothing but commit myself to scientific truth And the care of patients. Many that I wanna talk about. And I wanna talk about that we have a solution to this crisis. There is a drug that is proving to be of miraculous impact. And when I say miracle, I do not use that term lightly. And I don't wanna be sensationalized when I say that. That is a scientific recommendation based on mountains of data that has emerged in the last 3 months. Mountains of data have emerged from all from many centers and countries around the world showing the miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin. It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. Speaker 5: Well, firstly, what you said there is incorrect. Now if you only pick up today's papers, the Sydney Morning Herald, Australia's most senior immunologist, Emeritus professor Robert Clancy, Someone that was actually awarded an order of Australia for his services to immunology and medicine. He has said, and I quote, Craig Kelly is absolutely right. Now that's our most senior immunologist. So the idea that, I'm, I completely and utterly reject the idea That I'm out there putting any theories forward. I'm not putting any theories forward at all. Now, yes, some of the studies that I've posted are still undergoing peer review, But many of them have actually been through the peer review process. In fact, I would say the majority of the studies that I've posted have been through the peer reviewed process. And just because something I'm sorry. If that Speaker 2: is just not true, Craig. Speaker 0: I mean, one of the studies you've worked Speaker 2: it's a Bangladeshi plastic surgeon. I would like to take my medical advice from someone who is knowledgeable in infectious diseases is an epidemiologist. Speaker 5: Well, that's all. You should listen Speaker 2: to that. Speaker 0: In other cases, Speaker 5: you should listen to professor Robert Clancy. He's the most senior credentialed immunologist in this country. So that's who I believe we should be listening to. And he is he has said, like, I'll quote exactly What he's wrote Speaker 0: You've just you've already quoted it, Craig. No. Speaker 5: I haven't. I he also said it. I thought this is very important. He said, from uncertain beginnings, An impressive database has more recently been accumulated that strongly supports the use of hydroxychloroquine and or Ivermectin. Their use in concert with the vaccine, so this is not an anti vaxx position. You know, when the use in concert with the vaccines can no longer be denied. In fact, this is the only science based opinion. Now they're not my words. From Speaker 0: That's not my study. You're Speaker 2: referring to. Speaker 0: That's another study you're referring Speaker 2: to because Speaker 0: this is Speaker 5: important. Study. You are misrepresenting what I'm saying. What I'm what I'm No. No. No. But Speaker 2: I did my research, Craig, Speaker 0: as you asked us Speaker 2: to do. Speaker 4: You need to listen for a moment. Speaker 5: But hang on. Speaker 2: Look at that. Is a wonderful drug. You're right. If you have scabies or river blindness Speaker 5: You obviously haven't read. I'm sorry. You are not listening to our you've gotta listen to the science. You've gotta listen Speaker 6: to a doctor. Speaker 4: Are you a scientist? Speaker 2: Are you a scientist, Craig? I'm not. Speaker 5: I am not. I have just quoted the senior immunologist in this country, The most high as credentialed immunologist in this country. Now are you saying that he's wrong? Speaker 7: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people Speaker 4: die. Speaker 6: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products related authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, Preventing or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the US. Speaker 8: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then The logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products is no longer supportable.
DschlopesIsBack
Posted - January 14, 2024 at 2:18 AM
Saved - January 14, 2024 at 5:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a thought-provoking video, Dr. David Martin reveals that the push for COVID shots was questionable, as effective treatments were suppressed. He highlights the shocking fact that the CDC, formerly a supporter of hydroxychloroquine, now demonizes it. The video sheds light on the audacity of this crime. Watch for more insights.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

This might be the most eye-opening video clip that you see this year... The COVID shots pushed on billions of people could only be justified if there were no treatment options. So, what did they do? According to Dr. David Martin, they let people die and suppressed treatments to make way for a “vaccine.” The audacity of the crime was shocking: The CDC, before it became the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was the US Malaria Suppression Program in Atlanta, Georgia, which did what? It advocated for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine. The institutions that demonized hydroxychloroquine were once its strongest believers. Watch. @DrDMartinWorld

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the suppression of published treatment options and suggests that it may be a tactic to justify emergency medical countermeasures. They find it ironic that Johns Hopkins University, named after the person who popularized Hydroxychloroquine for malaria treatment, now claims it is dangerous. The speaker also mentions the CDC's previous advocacy for Hydroxychloroquine distribution. They emphasize the audacity of the alleged crime and express surprise at the public's blindness to the information presented.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We should have recognized that when treatment was being suppressed and by the way, not hypothetical treatment, published treatment. When that was being suppressed, we should have gone, hold on a minute. It sounds like there's a racket here. Some suppressing real treatment options, and they're suppressing it so that they can justify an emergency medical counter measure that can only be authorized if there are no treatment options. How funny is it? The Johns Hopkins University, that's right, named for Johns Hopkins, the guy who actually popularized Hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of malaria. How ironic is that the very institution funded by the Rockefeller Foundation to celebrate Johns Hopkins, how ironic like is it that that Johns Hopkins University was able to turn on its own namesake and say Hydroxychloroquine is dangerous. The school has its name because Hydroxychloroquine is safe. That's why it has its named. The CDC used to be, before it became the Center For Disease Control and Prevention, the US Malaria depression program in Atlanta, Georgia, which did what? Advocate for the distribution of Hydroxychloroquine. This is one of those things where you sit back and you go, the audacity of the crime is what's surprising. Not the existence or absence of a disease or the existence or the absence of a pathogen. The thing that's shocking, truly shocking, really shocking is how audacious the criminals are and how blind the public is to reading the information that is right in front of their face in preference to trying to find a motivation for how bad people in government could possibly do anything as bad as what I've just described.
VigilantFox
Posted - February 27, 2024 at 12:25 AM
Saved - February 27, 2024 at 7:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, recognized for its impact on human health and Nobel Prize-winning discovery, was wrongly labeled as a "horse dewormer" by propagandists. Despite its effectiveness, approved COVID medicines are expensive. Controlled trials show significant benefits of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, yet they are dismissed. @VigilantNews shares secrets and explores the potential of ivermectin in treating cancer.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But propagandists told you it was “horse dewormer.” Out of 43 effective medicines for COVID, the ones approved had something in common: They were all outrageously expensive, in the many hundreds, if not, thousands of dollars. Dr. @PierreKory testified: "As of today, there have been 420 controlled trials studying hydroxychloroquine in Covid. That includes over half a million patients with ivermectin. There have been 100 controlled trials with over 225,000 patients. "And summary analyses of these evidence bases all show large magnitude, statistically significant benefits in all important outcomes. "Yet in this country, ivermectin is considered an ineffective horse dewormer, and hydroxychloroquine, the drug of fringe quack, right-wing anti-vaxxers."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The forest plot shows COVID medicines, with only expensive ones approved in the US. Cheaper drugs were ignored. Studies manipulated endpoints and faced negative PR. Over 420 trials on hydroxychloroquine and 100 on Ivermectin show significant benefits, but they are dismissed in the US.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what's called the forest plot that shows 43 effective medicines in COVID. I've circled the only ones that were, approved for use in United States. And actually, the circles are off. But if you look, you probably can't see it. But if you look at the costs, the only things approved in the United States all cost in the many 100, if not 1,000 of dollars. Every zero, a $1, $2, $5 medicine was completely ignored and never would reach regulatory approval. Further, when they did not get the result they wanted, in several instances they were forced to change the original endpoint, a supposed never event in research science. And despite these manipulations, each of these studies' publications launch massive negative PR campaigns and recommendations from health agencies against the use of these inexpensive, safe, repurposed drugs. Last slide. If you look, this is just a little summary of the evidence base as we sit here today. As of today, there have been 420 controlled trials studying hydroxychloroquine in COVID. That includes over half a 1000000 patients. With Ivermectin, there have been 100 controlled trials with over 125,000 patients. And summary analyses of these evidence bases all show large magnitude statistically significant benefits in all important outcomes. Yet in this country, Ivermectin is considered an ineffective horse dewormer and hydroxychloroquine, the drug of fringe, quack, right wing anti vaxxers.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Stories on @VigilantNews: Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed/

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews 6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving/

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving This article originally appeared on drturner.substack.com and was republished with permission.Guest post by Michael Turner, M.D.Greetings Dear Friends,Inspired anew by my recent podcast with my friend Dr. Kory (who must be considered the world's expert on the use of Ivermectin in COVID), I wanted to share some summary insights with you about this truly astonishing vigilantnews.com
9NewsNancy
Posted - July 13, 2024 at 8:26 PM
Saved - July 14, 2024 at 2:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Leaked DARPA documents reveal that left-wing medical operatives knew about three potential cures for C*19 in April 2020. President Trump was apparently unaware of this information. The known curatives listed on the secret jump drive were hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and interferon. The FDA states that a vaccine cannot be authorized if there is a known cure. Theories about the motives behind the push for the mRNA vaccine include controlling the world, population control, and preventing Trump's reelection.

@9NewsNancy - NANCY

🚨Leaked DARPA documents released by Project Veritas it appears left-wing medical operatives that were on the C*19 team, Big Pharma, Big Tech, et al, knew three treatments were identified as a cure for C*19 in April, 2020. This information, apparently unknown to President Trump, was hidden on a DARPA jump drive. According to Project Veritas the three known curatives that were listed on the secret jump drive were: ✅hydroxychloroquine ✅ivermectin ✅interferon A vaksine cannot be brought to market under an EUA if there is a known curative. ~FDA

@JimmyFalk_55 - Jimmy Falk5

@liz_churchill10 They motivated hospital administrators to not prescribe the cure for COVID-19 via...$$$$ https://t.co/ySWKRhSUYS

Video Transcript AI Summary
When someone dies with COVID-19, it's counted as a COVID-19 death, not just an infection. Doctors are being paid more for listing patients as COVID-19 cases, with $13,000 for a COVID-19 admission and $39,000 if the patient goes on a ventilator. Some believe this treatment approach is wrong and could harm many people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One dies with COVID 19, we are counting that as a COVID 19 death. You don't die with an infection. You die from an infection. Speaker 1: I've talked with doctors who have admitted that they are being incentivized to list patients that are sick or have died with COVID 19. Speaker 0: Yeah. $13,000 for Medicare if you call it COVID 19. Speaker 2: Right now, Medicare is determined that if you have a COVID 19 admission to the hospital, you'll get paid $13,000. If that COVID 19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000, 3 times as much. Speaker 0: And you've killed them with the ventilator because you gave them the wrong treatment. Speaker 2: All the Speaker 1: things that just don't make sense, the patients I'm seeing in front of me, the lungs I'm trying to improve have led me to believe that we are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue, and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time. My next question

@9NewsNancy - NANCY

🤔WHY? Theories about why they needed the entire world to have this mRNA vaccine and why they would need to keep taking it abound. Destroying the American economy so President Trump would not get reelected, controlling the entire world, including population control, all come to mind.

P_McCulloughMD
Posted - August 20, 2024 at 12:31 PM
Saved - August 20, 2024 at 2:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the suppression of early treatments for SARS-CoV-2 was a strategy to condition the public to accept ongoing mass vaccinations. This approach fostered fear and suffering, leading many to think that the only solution was to receive frequent vaccine shots, regardless of potential toxicity. Our easy-to-read book addresses this issue, and despite attempts by Amazon to ban it in 2023, we successfully fought back. You can get your copy today.

@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

Suppression of SARS-CoV-2 Early Treatment was to Prepare the World to Accept Mass Vaccination It worked to promote fear, suffering, hospitalization and death to make people believe the only option was to accept a vaccine shot every six months with no end--no matter how toxic. This is a key message in our easy-to-read book that @amazon attempted to ban in 2023. We fought them and won! Get your copy today. http://www.couragetofacecovid.com https://rumble.com/v1yvypy-courage-to-face-covid-19-true-story-book-trailer.html

Courage to Face Covid Courage to Face Covid couragetofacecovid.com
Courage to Face COVID-19: True Story Book Trailer Buy the book at: www.couragetofacecovid.com The story of doctors who developed a safe and effective early treatment for COVID-19 and their battle with the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex that suppressed it rumble.com

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Let this sink in: The COVID shots forced on billions of people could only be authorized if there were no previously-existing treatment options. So, what did they do? According to Dr. David Martin, they let people die and suppressed treatments like HCQ and ivermectin in order to make way for a “vaccine.” The audacity of the crime was shocking: The CDC, before it became the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was the US Malaria Suppression Program in Atlanta, Georgia, which did what? It advocated for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine. The institutions that demonized hydroxychloroquine were once its strongest believers. @VigilantFox 🦊

Video Transcript AI Summary
When treatment was being suppressed, it should have been recognized as a "racket." Johns Hopkins University, named for Johns Hopkins who popularized hydroxychloroquine for malaria, ironically turned on its namesake by saying hydroxychloroquine is dangerous. The CDC used to be the US Malaria Suppression Program, which advocated for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine. The speaker finds the audacity of the "criminals" shocking, as well as the public's blindness to information. Society has been conditioned to accept a fear-based narrative without question, like hiding under school desks during nuclear attacks. This instilled fear, allowing people to respond to authoritative impulses. People have been habituated to believe that if authorities architect the fear and tell you what to do, you do it. If society stopped living in fear, the signal couldn't transmit.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We should have recognized that when treatment was being suppressed, and by the way, not hypothetical treatment, published treatment. When that was being suppressed, we should have gone. Hold on a minute. It sounds like there's a racket here. Somebody suppressing real treatment options and they're suppressing it so that they can Johns Hopkins Hopkins University, that's right, named for Johns Hopkins, the guy who actually popularized hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of malaria. How ironic is it that the very institution funded by the Rockefeller Foundation to celebrate Johns Hopkins, how ironic is it that that Johns Hopkins University was able to turn on its own namesake and say hydroxychloroquine is dangerous? That school has its name because hydroxy Chloroquine is safe. That's why it has its name. The CDC used to be, before it became the Center For Disease Control and Prevention, the US Malaria Suppression Program in Atlanta, Georgia, which did what? Advocate for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine. This is one of those things where you sit back and you go, the audacity of the crime is what's surprising. Not the existence or absence of a disease or the existence of the absence of pathogen. The thing that's shocking, truly shocking, is how audacious the criminals are and how blind the public is to reading the information that is right in front of their face in preference to trying to find a motivation for how bad people in government could possibly do anything as bad as what I've just described. So I think there's a lot of problems in terms of how we have been conditioned to take on information. And I think that as a society, we have been conditioned to accept a fear based narrative without question. You'll recall, as I will, and I'm dating myself, but you'll recall when we were told that we should crawl under school desks in elementary school and hide under our desks in the event of a nuclear attack from Russia. Now you'll remember those desks. They had a wooden top. They had a little metal casement and then 4 metal stands. And somehow his children, we were conditioned to say that in the event of a nuclear blast, we were going to somehow be saved under our desks. Really? Does anybody know anything about radiation? Does anybody know anything about how nuclear weapons work? Because hiding under a desk merely means that your corpse is preserved. So when the Palm pay diggers come back to dig you up, they'll find nice little encapsulated children huddled under melted metal desks. It'll be phenomenal. And it'll be great for a museum somewhere. What a nonsensical thing to do. But why did that practice become ubiquitous cross country? It was to instill fear allows you to respond to an authoritative impulse. And I can guarantee you every single person who is a parent over the age of 40 knows that they were conditioned to accept, be afraid, set any logic aside. And if the authority tells you to do it in fear, do it. And by the way, if you were like me being a little smart ass, because I was in elementary school, When you pointed out how stupid that was, you know what you got sent to the principal's office. See, this programming has been around for a long time and we pretend like it's, oh my gosh, how did this happen in 2019? No, come on. We have been habituated into the belief that if the people in authority who architect the fear, tell you a to be afraid and then b what to do when you're afraid, then you do it. And if we, as a society stopped living in the fear narrative, the signal couldn't transmit.
BelannF
Posted - September 17, 2024 at 7:04 PM
Saved - September 18, 2024 at 11:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some startling information about the efforts of North American scientists who spent 15 years preparing for a potential pandemic, completing their research by 2015-2016. I highlighted that DARPA, the research arm of the US military, identified Ivermectin as the top recommendation for combating a coronavirus pandemic and communicated this to the CDC. Additionally, I noted that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was recognized for its antiviral and immune-modulating properties.

@BelannF - BelannF

AMERICANS - - - ARE YOU SITTING DOWN - - - YOU MIGHT NEED TO SIT DOWN. DR Chris Shoemaker: North American scientists spent 15 years trying to discover how to stop a covid pandemic should one occur - The research was all done by 2015-2016. DARPA - the research arm of the US military knew and specifically recommended and passed the information on to the CDC that Ivermectin in particular was the absolute number one product to be used in the event of a coronavirus pandemic. It was also known that HCQ was highly antiviral and immune modulatory - Proven

Video Transcript AI Summary
North American science spent 15 years preparing for the next COVID after the original SARS CoV 1 outbreak in 2002-2003. By 2015-2016, research was complete. DARPA recommended to the CDC that ivermectin was the number one product to use in the event of a coronavirus pandemic. Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were known to be highly antiviral and immune modulatory. These effects were proven in vitro and in vivo with animals. Both medications were known to be completely safe for humans, having been used for 35 to 40 years. This knowledge was readily available for use at the next pandemic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Important thing to realize is that North American science spent 15 years figuring out what to do with the next COVID. With that 2,002, 2003, the original SARS CoV 1 occurred. And so all sorts of experiments went on to determine what would be a useful response were something similar to occur. And the research was done. It was research was all done by 2015, 2016. And DARPA, d a r p a, the American research arm of the US military, it specifically do and specifically recommended and passed the information on to the CDC that ivermectin, in particular, was the absolute number one product to be used in the event of a coronavirus pandemic. It was fully known that ivermectin and certainly hydroxychloroquine as well were highly antiviral and immune modulatory. And those 2 things were the key to modulate the immune response plus to be antiviral as well. Those elements were both totally proven in vitro and in vivo with animals so that it was known. And, of course, we knew it was completely safe for humans because these medications have been used for 35 to 40 years in humans. And so that's what was sitting there ready to be used at the next pandemic.
GinaSaysSo
Posted - November 18, 2024 at 10:27 AM
Saved - November 18, 2024 at 12:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that the FDA recently admitted a mistake regarding Ivermectin's dismissal for Covid treatment. It's alarming that 200 members of Congress and their families were treated with it instead of the vaccine. After promoting millions of doses from Big Pharma, they now want to pretend they have morals. Where's the acknowledgment of the jab's dangers, which they knew about in 2020? I believe we should hold the FDA accountable for the Emergency Use Authorization, as they misled us about Ivermectin's safety and effectiveness. This feels like a crime against humanity.

@GinaSaysSo - Gina

Did you happen to notice that earlier in the year the FDA quietly admitted a mistake on trashing Ivermectin to prevent and treat Covid? Well...200 members of Congress and their families were treated with Ivermectin INSTEAD of the jab, so I'm fairly certain the FDA knew. Now, after hundreds of millions of BIG PHARMA doses, they want to admit to a mistake on Ivermectin??? You mean pretend to have morals? What a bunch of crap. Where's the admittance on the ineffective and dangerous jab-poison running through the veins of tens of millions of people? These are dangers that they knew about in 2020 and have been hiding, blocking and keeping from us. Maybe I'm just having a bad day, but I call that murder. How about THIS instead? 👇 We SUE the shit out of the corrupted FDA for the jab Emergency Use Authorization when they KNEW Ivermectin was both safe and effective. EUA cannot happen if there are SAFE and EFFECTIVE treatments, PERIOD. So that means, they knowingly lied to us about the safety and effectiveness of Ivermectin (called it horse dewormer) and Hydroxychloroquine so they could get that big pharma authorization approved. Our lives mean nothing! Then the MSM (a corrupted arm of government) PUSHED, MANDATED and SCARED people into injecting poison for PROFIT, knowing in 2020 that the jab was ineffective and dangerous. THEY ARE STILL JABBING!!!! CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY IS BEING TOO KIND.

@DrEtiquette - DR. ETIQUETTE 🤦‍♂️

The FDA openly lied about the benefits of Ivermectin because that was the only way they could get the Covid bio weapon jab approved for emergency use. https://t.co/5hc5NmmYj7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA's website advises against using ivermectin for COVID-19, yet links to clinical trials, half of which indicate it may be effective. For three years, the FDA has warned against ivermectin while referencing studies that support its use. Additionally, there is increasing research suggesting ivermectin could be a vital treatment for COVID-19. The strong opposition from the federal government appears to be linked to the desire to maintain emergency use authorization for COVID vaccines. For more insights, consider subscribing for additional videos.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you actually click on the website that the FDA was linking to in that social media post, you're taken to this page here titled why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID 19. And funny enough, that page hyperlinks to a bunch of clinical trials, half of which, if you actually go through them, say that Ivermectin is effective at treating COVID. And I mean, really take that in for a moment. For 3 years now, the FDA has been advising people against Ivermectin while linking to a depository of studies, half of which suggest that Ivermectin is effective. You sometimes cannot make this up. Regardless, even outside of the clinical trials that were linked to by the FDA, there is a growing body of research showing that for 1, Ivermectin is potentially at least an essential treatment for COVID And that secondly, the reason that it was so strongly repelled by the federal government was so that they could maintain their emergency use authorization status for the COVID vaccines. And if you thought that was interesting, well, hit that subscribe button and get more videos just like this.
GinaSaysSo
Posted - December 9, 2024 at 11:06 AM
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 1:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that over 200 members of Congress and their families were secretly treated with Ivermectin for Covid-19, which was proven to be safe and effective. It raises questions about why they remained silent during a global pandemic and why mainstream media labeled it as horse de-wormer. The CDC and FDA also downplayed its effectiveness, even mocking Americans. Meanwhile, the government allegedly paid pharmacies to remove Ivermectin from shelves, prioritizing profits from vaccines over public health. This situation feels like a betrayal, and it’s time to channel that anger into action.

@GinaSaysSo - Gina

Members of Congress and their familes were secretely treated with Ivermectin for Covid 19. It was PROVEN a safe and effective treatment. So why were these 200 members of Congress silent about their success with the Ivermectin treatment? Why the secret? Weren't we in the middle of a Global Pandemic? Why was MSM labeling it horse de-wormer? Meantime the corrupted CDC and FDA also kept Ivermectin a secret with the FDA even shaming Americans with warnings like this: 'You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.' And, as for the 81 million (my ass) installed puppet: ON BIDEN'S WATCH OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PAID PHARMACIES HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS TO STRIP THEIR SHELVES OF IVERMECTIN. Wanna know why? With a safe and effective existing treatment for Covid, there would be no Emergency Use Authorization granted for the 'vaccine.' Nevermind safe. Nevermind effective. We're talking about power and money and that's everything to big government. So Ivermectin vanished in an MSM-created cloud of shame. This 'horse-dewormer' could have saved millions of lives. Our government was more interested in the BILLIONS it could make in partnership with big pharma. Our lives didn't matter to the Biden Administration. Biden/Harris were installed to DESTROY us. Find your anger. Then find your resolve.

drsimonegold
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 1:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
For 70 years, hydroxychloroquine was deemed safer than Tylenol by the FDA's adverse event database. Suddenly, it was labeled 'dangerous' by the media. This feels more like propaganda than medicine. Also, check out my full episode with Jordan Peterson on YouTube.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

For 70 years, hydroxychloroquine was considered safer than Tylenol, according to the FDA’s own adverse event database (FAERS). Then suddenly, the media labeled it ‘dangerous.’ This wasn’t medicine—it was propaganda. https://t.co/VhhFR7DnEU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors were aware that hydroxychloroquine was safe until the media suggested otherwise. They claimed it was both safe and effective, but when the narrative shifted to it being unsafe, despite its 70-year history and a government database showing it to be safer than Tylenol, it raised concerns. The assertion of its lack of safety felt like a significant deception.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But all the doctors knew hydroxychloroquine was safe until media told them otherwise. So let me this nifty trick they did, they're safe and effective. So if the media and the and the journals had just said, oh, it's not effective. Right. Right. Right. Maybe I would have fallen for it. I don't think so. But maybe. But when they started saying it wasn't safe, when we've had it for 70 years, when there's a government database on called FAERS Yeah. The FDA adverse events reporting system Mhmm. Which keeps track of all side effects of drugs. Mhmm. And hydroxychloroquine is much safer than Tylenol in that database. They started saying it's not safe. I knew Right. This is a big lie.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Watch the full episode with @jordanbpeterson on YouTube: https://youtu.be/98vOV1QBQEY?feature=shared

goddeketal
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 11:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how the pandemic was manipulated for power, detailing staged events, misleading statistics, and psychological tactics used to instill fear. I discussed the false narratives around asymptomatic spread, the inflation of COVID death counts, and the suppression of effective treatments to promote vaccines. The media played a crucial role in perpetuating panic, while dissent was silenced. Ultimately, I argued that the pandemic served as a pretext for a broader agenda, reshaping society under elite control, rather than focusing on public health.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC They fooled the world, crashed economies, censored truth, and rewrote science overnight. Here's exactly how they turned fear, lies, and propaganda into the greatest power grab of our time. ⬇️ A THREAD ⬇️ https://t.co/4wWONfONjy

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1. Staged Wuhan Panic: China kicked off the scare with choreographed "collapse in the street" videos. People dramatically keeling over in Wuhan, something never seen elsewhere. Even WHO called these collapses "atypical." It was pure psy-op theater to ignite global fear. https://t.co/v7vaoBXXM4

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2. Bogus PCR cases: A phony testing regime built the “casedemic.” The German cirologist @c_drosten introduced a PCR test that can’t diagnose infection – cranked to excessive cycle thresholds so it flagged mostly false positives. Millions of healthy people were branded “dangerous COVID cases,” juicing the numbers to justify lockdowns.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3. “Asymptomatic spread” myth: They pushed the lie that healthy people could silently infect others, to justify testing and restricting those with no symptoms. But there is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission. This was propaganda to lock down the healthy and mask toddlers. What many people don’t know is that the person who came up with the lie of asymptomatic transmission is the same one who created the COVID PCR protocol: the German virologist Christian Drosten.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4. Coordinated Narrative Shift on COVID: On Feb 1, 2020, Fauci, Drosten, Andersen & others had a secret call. They admitted COVID might be lab-made. Within days, they flipped, pushed the natural origin lie, and Andersen got millions in grants. Science was replaced with narrative. https://t.co/r4fqdyx9Ip

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5. Weaponized psychology: Governments literally hired behavioral psychologists to crank up the fear. In the UK, the SPI-B team admit they used “unethical” fear tactics – one scientist called it “totalitarian… not ethical”​ – to increase compliance. Leaked documents show officials discussing how to frighten the public into obedience. This was a deliberate fear pandemic, not a viral one.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6. Needed fake mortality: The sniffles were never going to kill enough people to sustain panic. To maintain the illusion of a deadly pandemic, they needed excess mortality data. So they cooked the books to create the appearance of mass death (see next points). COVID’s true infection fatality rate (~0.2% globally) is akin to a bad flu – so they had to inflate the body count by any means.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7. Manufactured hysteria illness: Since “mild cold symptoms” wouldn’t deliver the death spike they needed, authorities terrorized everyone to trigger mass psychogenic illness – essentially people getting sick from fear​ via chronically elevated cortisol levels. These elevated levels suppress immunity; anxiety and lockdown harms caused spikes in deaths (heart attacks, overdoses) that they then counted as “COVID.” It was a self-fulfilling pandemic of fear.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8. 24/7 media terror: They blasted fear propaganda non-stop. News tickers ran running death tolls, every hospital incident became front-page news, and worst-case models dominated headlines. Governments fed the panic with lurid warnings (Boris Johnson claiming “bodies piled high” if restrictions lifted). By design, the public was kept in a state of constant fear. Objective risk (median COVID age ~80) was ignored to create the impression anyone could drop dead tomorrow.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9. Flu cases relabeled as COVID: Flu virtually disappeared. Instead of celebrating the end of flu, officials pretended it was due to COVID measures – an absurd lie while COVID supposedly ran rampant. They simply rebranded the flu (and other respiratory illnesses) as “COVID” to inflate the pandemic.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10. Every death counted as COVID: If you died in a car crash but tested positive, it was marked as a COVID death. Guidelines said even if the cause was clearly unrelated, it still counted. Hospitals were told to list deaths as COVID if the patient had ever tested positive or was merely suspected. Even those who died within two weeks of a positive test were included. This wildly inflated the stats by labeling non-COVID deaths as COVID.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11. Financial incentives to inflate deaths: Hospitals had a perverse monetary motive to jack up COVID diagnoses. In the US, thanks to emergency payouts, a COVID patient on a ventilator could bring in ~$40,000 – roughly triple the normal reimbursement. Medicare’s 20% bonus for COVID cases and ventilator bonuses meant big $$$ for hospitals that labeled patients as COVID and put them on vents. This incentivized over-treatment and even negligence (e.g. unnecessary venting with ~90% fatality once intubated). It literally paid to have more COVID deaths.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12. Early treatments banned: They aggressively suppressed effective therapies to protect the vaccine rollout. Doctors using ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or vitamin D were vilified. The Lancet published a fake HCQ study (later retracted) that halted global trials. Meanwhile, they pushed toxic and expensive remdesivir. Even monoclonal antibodies and IV vitamin C were restricted. Denying real treatment let patients worsen, driving deaths and fear, all to pave the way for their “miracle” vaccines.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13. Fake hospital footage & crisis actors: Media showed us scenes of overflowing hospitals – often misleading or outright fake. Example: CBS News was caught using video of a packed Italian ICU while reporting on NYC’s COVID situation​, implying New York hospitals were overrun. They called it an “editing mistake.” Similar stunts happened worldwide (recycling old disaster photos, staging scenes). Meanwhile, many hospitals were actually so empty (elective care canceled) that nurses had time for TikTok dance videos. The “overwhelmed hospitals” narrative was largely a scripted show to panic the public.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14. Draconian lockdowns with no benefit: They imposed China-style society-wide lockdowns – a blunt instrument never recommended in prior pandemic plans. Small businesses, schools, churches all shuttered by government decree. The result was a devastating economic and social harm, with no proven mortality benefit.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15. “Vaccines are the only way out”: After stoking panic and crushing cures, they presented the magic solution – rushed mRNA vaccines. Self-proclaimed health experts like Bill Gates promised these experimental shots were 95% effective and safe, that vaccination would end the pandemic. Governments shoveled billions to Pharma and granted them blanket immunity from liability for any harms. They then coerced the public via mandates and “passport” systems. It was a massive human experiment, using fear to sell acceptance of a novel vaccine platform and to cement a new level of state and corporate control over individual bodies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16. Lies about vaccine efficacy: They did not hesitate to lie. The CDC Director herself falsely claimed “vaccinated people do not carry the virus”​ and won’t get sick. President Biden said “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” These statements were patently false – breakthrough infections happened by the millions, and studies showed vaccinated individuals can spread COVID​. They knowingly oversold the vaccines to bully people into compliance, then kept changing the story (“you need a booster…actually 3 boosters…”). Fun fact: If you died within two weeks of a positive PCR test, you were counted as a COVID death — no questions asked. But if you died within two weeks of the vaccine? “Doesn’t count, it hadn’t kicked in yet.” One rule to inflate fear, another to protect the narrative.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17. Goalposts forever shifting: Nothing was ever temporary. “15 days to slow the spread” turned into 15 months of restrictions​. They said masks were unnecessary – then mandated two masks. They said lockdowns would be one-time – then reimposed them repeatedly. They promised “herd immunity” at 70% vaccinated – then moved the target. Each time the public met one demand, authorities doubled back and added more, betraying every assurance. This psychological abuse kept societies off-balance and prolongued the emergency powers indefinitely.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18. Crushing and punishing dissent: Any expert or citizen who questioned the narrative was attacked. High-profile scientists who proposed focused protection (the Great Barrington Declaration) were subjected to a secret campaign by NIH officials calling for a “quick and devastating takedown” of them​. Doctors who saved patients with ivermectin or other protocols were stripped of licenses. Online skeptic communities were purged from Facebook , Twitter, and YouTube. Whistleblowers (nurses, data analysts) faced gag orders. The establishment used character assassination and censorship to maintain the illusion of unanimous “Science” support, quashing debate through intimidation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19. Data rigging to promote vaccines: When vaccines rolled out, they manipulated statistics to credit them. In May 2021 the CDC quietly stopped tracking COVID cases among vaccinated people unless hospitalized or dead​. Tens of thousands of breakthrough infections disappeared from the data. By counting every case in unvaccinated but ignoring most in vaccinated, they fabricated a narrative that “almost only the unvaccinated” were getting sick. This was a blatant data trick to prop up vaccine efficacy and fuel scapegoating of the unvaccinated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20. Ever-changing variants to extend fear: Just as the original wave waned, they hyped new “variants of concern” – Alpha, Delta, Omicron – to keep fear alive, and then blamed it on the unvaccinated. Each variant became the next reason for booster shots and continued restrictions. Media dutifully pumped scary stories (“Delta hitting young people”, “Omicron evades immunity”) with little context. It was a moving target to prevent the public from relaxing. By the time people caught on that each variant was milder than advertised, another one was on the horizon. The endless variants ensured the panic carousel kept spinning.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21. Excess mortality surged post-vaccination: After mass vaccination campaigns, excess deaths rose dramatically, and continue even now. Authorities blamed everything from heatwaves to gardening and “climate anxiety,” desperately avoiding the most obvious cause: the jab itself. https://t.co/E7pam6YzfC

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

22. Inventing "Long COVID": As vaccine injuries surged, authorities conveniently introduced "Long COVID", a vague, catch-all diagnosis. Its broad, ambiguous symptoms perfectly matched common post-vaccination side effects, masking the truth behind escalating injuries. https://t.co/Q7JvQbAOeO

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

23. Conveniently “ending” the pandemic: After three years of orchestrated chaos, they abruptly declared the crisis over – not because of any scientific breakthrough, but for political convenience. The WHO ended the global emergency in May 2023, even as excess mortality remained high. Suddenly, COVID coverage vanished. Leaders who imposed tyranny moved on to the next agenda (Ukraine, climate) without apology or accountability. The pandemic theater ended when its architects chose to shift focus — not when the virus faded. Now they want amnesty for terrorizing citizens for years.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

24. Engineered for the Great Reset: In sum, the “pandemic” was a planned global power grab – a pretext for a new world order. Consider that in October 2019, globalists (WEF/Gates) ran Event 201, a tabletop exercise simulating a coronavirus pandemic that crashes economies and prompts draconian measures​. Sound familiar? Just months later, COVID-19 hit and governments executed in lockstep the very playbook discussed. Klaus Schwab of the WEF openly called COVID-19 a “rare but narrow window” to impose the Great Reset of society. From lockdowns to digital IDs, the pandemic fulfilled a wish-list of authoritarian controls. This was never about public health – it was about exploiting a virus to restructure society under elite rule. The “fake pandemic” narrative has been proven by each of these hard facts, and history will remember it as one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated. Thank you for reading this thread and please give it a share and me a follow if you found it informative. Much appreciated.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a young generation, we are grateful to penetrate cabinets. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world by taking action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. People assume we are just going back to the good old world, but this is fiction. It will not happen. There is only one way this pandemic is going to go: it's going to get worse and worse and worse. The next crisis is already waiting for us, and it is the climate crisis.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a young generation like prime minister Trudeau, half of this cabinet are actually young noble leaders of the world are grateful. We penetrate the cabinets. The change is not just happening. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world. How to prepare? Take the necessary action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. So people assume we are just going back to the good old world which we had and everything will be normal again. This is, let's say, fiction. It will not happen. Speaker 1: There is only one way this pandemic is going to go. It's going to get worse and worse and worse. Speaker 0: The next crisis is already waiting for us around the coma, and it is the climate crisis.
ValerieAnne1970
Posted - May 11, 2025 at 7:28 AM
Saved - May 12, 2025 at 10:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
From the start, it seemed the focus was more on the vaccine than on effective treatments for COVID-19. Many viable treatments were disregarded, which allowed for the rapid push of emergency use authorization for vaccines. Treatments like Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Colchicine showed promise but were suppressed. Instead, the narrative emphasized fear, lockdowns, and waiting for a vaccine, with no mention of simple preventive measures like aspirin for blood clots. The message was clear: get vaccinated without question, every six months.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"It Was Clear From The Beginning, The Illness Of COVID Was Actually All About The Vaccine...A Needle Into Every Arm." "Any Treatment That Worked Was Shut Down & Abolished." "The Only Thing We Heard Is...Be Afraid Of This, Stay In Lockdown, Wear A Mask & Wait For A Vaccine." There were countless treatments that worked. But, there was a strict & forceful government response to abolish any treatments. If the government acknowledged that robust treatments were available...then the emergency use authorization for the vaccines could not have been pushed thru rapidly. You cannot authorize an experimental emergency use vaccine if viable treatments are available for the illness. It started with Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Virucidal Nasal Sprays...all of them work. Corticosteroids, Zinc, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Quercetin, over the counter Famotidine. There's research & literature to support all of these treatments. Colchicine...the best quality prospective, multicenter, double blind randomized placebo controlled trial in the history of COVID-19 was done with Colchicine. It reduced the risk of hospitalization & death. It was suppressed & abolished & no one heard a word about it. The federal government has never mentioned the drug Colchicine. People were dying of blood clots...& there was never, ever any mention of taking simple aspirin or other blood thinners to prevent blood clots. Worldwide, all we heard was be afraid of this, stay in lockdown, social distance, wear a mask, use hand sanitizer...none of which work. Just wait for the vaccine to save you. And when you get the vaccine, you've got to take it, every 6 months with no questions, no exceptions & do not miss a shot. 👇Colchicine: Divine Medicine Against Covid-19👇 https://www.mdpi.com/2872042 👇Hydroxychloroquine Effective Against Covid-19 👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7534595/ 👇Ivermectin Reduces Covid-19 Risk👇 https://c19ivm.org/meta.html Speaker: @P_McCulloughMD @McCulloughFund

Video Transcript AI Summary
Manufacturers of nasal products were allegedly warned against promoting or researching their products for COVID-19. One company was allegedly denied FDA permission to study its product's effect on COVID-19. Another company, COFIX Rx, allegedly received warnings to stop promoting its product for COVID-19. The speaker claims anything that worked for COVID-19 faced strict government opposition, including hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and virucidal nasal sprays. Higher dose corticosteroids, zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, quercetin, over-the-counter famotidine, and colchicine were also allegedly effective treatments. A high-quality trial allegedly showed colchicine reduced hospitalization and death, but the federal government never mentioned it. Aspirin and blood thinners were allegedly not mentioned for blood clot prevention. The speaker asserts the only advice given was to fear the virus, lockdown, social distance, wear masks, use hand sanitizer (none of which allegedly work), and repeatedly get vaccinated. The speaker concludes the COVID-19 response was allegedly about mandating vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every single manufacturer of any nasal product has said don't you dare try to promote this for COVID. Don't you dare even do research on COVID. One company, the company makes the product clear spelled x l e a r. They applied the FDA to say we just want to do a project seeing if we suppress COVID-nineteen. No. No, may not do this. Another company, COFIX Rx, received very strong warning letters. You're promoting this for COVID-nineteen, you have to stop. I can tell you, anything that works for COVID-nineteen, there was a strict and forceful government response to abolish it. Started with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, Viracidal nasal sprays. All of them work. All of them work! Higher dose corticosteroids, prednisone far more effective than dexamethasone The use of zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, quercetin Over the counter famotidine There's literature to support all of this, colchicine The best quality prospective multi center double blind randomized placebo controlled trial in the history of COVID-nineteen was done with colchicine and it reduced the risk of hospitalization and death. No word of it. Federal government has never mentioned the drug colchicine. Never. Never. And in fact now, you know, before with the earlier versions of the virus, people were dying of blood clots. You know, aspirin wasn't even mentioned or other blood thinners? No mention. The only thing Americans heard and people worldwide heard is be afraid of this, stay in lockdown, social distance, wear a mask, use hand sanitizer, none of which work, and then wait for a vaccine. And when you get a vaccine, you've got to take it, and you've got to take it every six months with no questions, no exceptions, and do not miss a shot. It was clear from the beginning, COVID-nineteen, the illness, was actually all about getting the vaccine, a needle in every arm.
Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Ivermectin reduces COVID-19 risk: real-time meta analysis of 105 studies 105 ivermectin COVID-19 controlled studies. 85% improvement for prophylaxis, p < 0.0001. 61% improvement for early treatment, p < 0.0001. 40% improvement for late treatment, p < 0.0001. ivmmeta c19ivm.org
Inversionism
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 9:23 PM
Saved - October 2, 2023 at 10:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the COVID pandemic, the US government acquired the global supply of remdesivir, despite its harmful effects and lack of effectiveness. They targeted doctors who advocated for safer alternatives and even banned the use of vitamin C. This was driven by profit, as remdesivir was expensive and boosted COVID mortality rates. The government's actions reflect a disturbing level of malice and disregard for human health. They prioritized pharmaceutical profits over the well-being of countless individuals.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

This is how we know that there was malice and forethought during the COVID pandemic. The US government bought up nearly the ENTIRE world supply of remdesivir in mid 2020. Nearly all of it, which is so insane considering what we know now with it's kidney nuking capacity and complete lack of efficacy. Then they took extreme actions towards doctors who were trying cheaper and safer alternative treatments by going as far as removing their license and ability to practice medicine. They even banned doctors from using vitamin C of all things... They only wanted people to use the severely toxic remdesivir because it was a cash cow for pharma at nearly $2000 per course of treatment, in addition to it being great at ensuring COVID mortality was exacerbated to pad the numbers and keep up the narrative of how deadly it was to further sell the vaccine. Idk how anyone can look back on the sequence of actions taken by the government and pharma from early 2020 until now with the continual shilling of boosters, and not see gross levels of malice with forethought. Beginning to end, it was completely anti-human, anti-health, anti-science, and absurdly pro-pharma in every way imaginable. They made billions off the willful harm and death of so many people.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US has purchased the majority of the world's supply of the COVID-19 drug remdesivir, causing concern among patients and healthcare professionals. Remdesivir has been shown to reduce hospitalization time for seriously ill patients, but its high cost and limited availability raise questions about global access to the treatment. Another effective drug, dexamethasone, is significantly cheaper and has been proven to reduce the risk of death in severely ill patients. While the NHS has enough remdesivir for current patients, the long-term supply is uncertain. A doctor shares his frustration with hospital interference in treatment protocols, highlighting the limitations and dangers of hospital care.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United States has struck a deal to buy almost the entire world's supply of a drug that's known to help people recover from COVID nineteen. In trials carried out in the UK as well as elsewhere, remdesivir was cutting the time needed in a hospital for the most seriously ill by about 4 days. It's one of only 2 drugs known to be effective in treating the virus, as our medical correspondent, Fergus Walsh, explains. Speaker 1: Geraldine from North London is one of more than a 1000 COVID patients who took part in a global trial of Remdesivir. This is her receiving the drug in April. She made a rapid recovery and is shocked that the drug has been bought up by the US. Speaker 2: I wanted to be part of something that could potentially help everyone, and I feel that now only a small percentage of the world's population, really, are going to receive any benefit from it in the in the near future. It's really disappointing. Speaker 1: Remdesivir takes months to manufacture, So there was already a shortage. This deal means the American pharma company, Gilead, will reserve nearly all production Speaker 3: COVID is a global problem with millions of patients affected worldwide. Those patients need access to proven treatments. For 1 country to dominate the access to a single treatment is beyond unfortunate. Speaker 1: There are now 2 drugs which have proven to be effective against COVID nineteen, Remdesivir and the steroid Dexamethasone. Remdesivir costs 1900 per course of treatment, whereas Dexamethasone costs just £5. Remdesivir cuts the duration of symptoms from 15 to 11 days, But it's not proven to reduce the risk of dying, whereas dexamethasone cuts the risk of dying by a third in the most seriously ill patients. The NHS says it has enough remdesivir For patients who currently need it, but how long that will last is unclear. But there are ample supplies of dexamethasone, which is now the standard treatment for seriously ill COVID patients. Fergus Voorhees BBC News. Speaker 4: What's happening now is completely unprecedented in the history of medicine and across the world. We have the federal government. We have state agencies and hospitals telling doctors how to practice medicine. They're interfering with the sacred patient physician relationship. They are telling doctors to be doctors. So I can tell you what happened to me. So I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a whole host of repurposed drugs. I then this is a memo. This is a memo sent to the entire health care system, but they targeted me personally. And what did this memo say? This said I can use remdesivir. And then I will quote. There was an added section. Do not endorse section, which includes medications that may cause harm and efficacy, is not supported in peer reviewed published RCTs. These medications will not be verified or dispensed for the prevention or treatment of COVID. This list includes Ivermectin, Picalutamide, Etoxacryloboxamine, Dutasteride and finasteride. And then just to stick it to me, they added ascorbic acid. Speaker 5: Otherwise known as Otherwise known as Speaker 4: system was effectively preventing me treating My patients according to my best clinical judgment. And then how did this progress, I objected. So the 1st week I was in ICU, I don't know what to do. What was I to do? My hands were tied. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I could not treat patients the way I had to be to treat patients. I had 7 COVID patients, including a 31 year old woman. I was not allowed to treat these people. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people die. I didn't try to sue the system. And you know what they did? They did something called peer sham review. It is a disgusting and evil concept. They then accused me of 7 most outrageous crimes that I had committed And that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients, they immediately suspended my hospital privileges because I possessed I posed such an outright threat To these patients, ignoring the fact that under my care, the mortality was 50%, those of my colleagues. I then went on through the sham peer review. I I went to a kangaroo court where they continued this, and the end result was I lost my hospital privilege and was reported to the national practitioner at Databank. So here I was standing up for patients' rights, and this hospital, this evil hospital, ended my medical career. So that's what they do. It's an outright Outrage, it's evil to the core. Why? Why did they Speaker 5: do that? Just one second. Doctor. Mac, did any of those cases that you were reviewed on, Were they non COVID cases? Were they pneumococcal pneumonia cases or staph sepsis? Where you used a broad range of your clinical skills? Speaker 4: These were all patients with COVID. Speaker 5: So it was specific to COVID, Not any other condition where you would use your broad range of clinical skills. It was only on COVID Absolutely. That the review was applied, and it was Applied in a way that was basically expressing and advising therapeutic nihilism. Which means for the American public, therapeutic nihilism means the denial of treatment In patients in the This Speaker 4: is the document which was sent to the entire healthcare system, which is the COVID nineteen comprehensive treatment guideline, which specifically was targeted at me, Preventing me from prescribing safe, effective off label drugs. It's unprecedented in the history of medicine. The hospital is telling me how to practice medicine. They're denying me the right to use safe and effective drugs and lying because they claim who Speaker 5: can use safe, effective, off label drugs For other conditions outside COVID? Speaker 4: Absolutely. If this was pneumococcal pneumonia, this wouldn't be an issue. This is specifically for COVID. So let me ask the question. How has the hospital treatment of patients advanced, improved over the last 2 years. Sorry to continue. So it's a terrible thing for me to say. I'm an intensivist. I've worked in the ICU for 35 years. Hospitals have become dangerous places for sick people. Patients must do whatever they can to avoid the hospital. When they are imprisoned in a hospital, they deny their rights. They are not allowed a patient advocate. Their family are denied access to the patient. They are prisoners in the system. They have no rights and they get the treatment dictated by the hospital. There are dangerous places for sick people. And that's for me as a physician practicing hospital medicine for 40 years, saddens me to the core. Yes. There's 2.
VigilantFox
Posted - February 27, 2024 at 12:25 AM
Saved - February 27, 2024 at 12:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, recognized for its impact on human health and Nobel Prize-winning discovery, was wrongly labeled as a "horse dewormer" by propagandists. The approved COVID medicines are all expensive, while ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have shown significant benefits in numerous controlled trials with large patient populations. However, they are dismissed in the US as ineffective and associated with fringe groups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But propagandists told you it was “horse dewormer.” Out of 43 effective medicines for COVID, the ones approved had something in common: They were all outrageously expensive, in the many hundreds, if not, thousands of dollars. Dr. @PierreKory testified: "As of today, there have been 420 controlled trials studying hydroxychloroquine in Covid. That includes over half a million patients with ivermectin. There have been 100 controlled trials with over 225,000 patients. "And summary analyses of these evidence bases all show large magnitude, statistically significant benefits in all important outcomes. "Yet in this country, ivermectin is considered an ineffective horse dewormer, and hydroxychloroquine, the drug of fringe quack, right-wing anti-vaxxers."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The forest plot shows COVID medicines, with only expensive ones approved in the US. Cheaper options were ignored. Study endpoints were changed when results weren't as expected. Despite positive outcomes in trials, hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin face negative perceptions in the US. Over 420 trials on hydroxychloroquine and 100 on Ivermectin show significant benefits, but they are still viewed negatively.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what's called the forest plot that shows 43 effective medicines in COVID. I've circled the only ones that were, approved for use in United States. And actually, the circles are off. But if you look, you probably can't see it. But if you look at the costs, the only things approved in the United States all cost in the many 100, if not 1,000 of dollars. Every zero, a $1, $2, $5 medicine was completely ignored and never would reach regulatory approval. Further, when they did not get the result they wanted, in several instances they were forced to change the original endpoint, a supposed never event in research science. And despite these manipulations, each of these studies' publications launch massive negative PR campaigns and recommendations from health agencies against the use of these inexpensive, safe, repurposed drugs. Last slide. If you look, this is just a little summary of the evidence base as we sit here today. As of today, there have been 420 controlled trials studying hydroxychloroquine in COVID. That includes over half a 1000000 patients. With Ivermectin, there have been 100 controlled trials with over 125,000 patients. And summary analyses of these evidence bases all show large magnitude statistically significant benefits in all important outcomes. Yet in this country, Ivermectin is considered an ineffective horse dewormer and hydroxychloroquine, the drug of fringe, quack, right wing anti vaxxers.
View Full Interactive Feed