TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 10, 2023 at 9:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Gates, a controversial figure, is accused of having a detached worldview and questionable philanthropic motives. His monopolization of science and population control agenda are concerning. Gates' connections to eugenics, IBM's involvement in Nazi activities, and his family's ties to Planned Parenthood raise eyebrows. Furthermore, his business tactics, such as cheating his partner and facing antitrust violations, reveal a ruthless side. Despite portraying himself as a generous philanthropist, Gates invests in harmful industries and engages in questionable practices. His vaccination programs have caused collateral damage, and his influence in global health initiatives is unparalleled. Gates' ultimate goal seems to be endless cash flow and control.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

1/100: It's time to examine the biggest snake oil seller of the planet - @BillGates: his detached worldview, his alleged philanthropic motives, the monopolisation of science, behavioural patterns of the wannabe saviour of the planet & possible endgames. It's a #WildRide-Thread.⬇️

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

2/100: To understand the opportunist Bill Gates, one must rummage through history, as well as internalize his basic attitude: Total control at any price, ethical issues are non-existent in his world, collateral damages were and still are part of his daily bread, part of his game.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

3/100: Plato & Aristotélēs had early ideas on "Population Control"; Thomas R. Malthus' "An Essay on the Principle of Population" (1798) outlines "the positive check to population": Diseases, wars, disasters, famines & pestilence, he wanted to utilize them. https://bit.ly/3dasgLZ

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

4/100: Charles Darwin released "On The Origin Of Species" (1859), he hinted on the implications of human populations, but his cousin Sir Francis Galton became obsessed with the idea: He published "Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development" (1883) bit.ly/3cqOzhq

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

5/100: Galton wrote: "Its intention is to touch on various topics more or less connected with that of the cultivation of race, or, as we might call it, with 𝚎𝚞𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚌." The term comes from the greek word 𝚎𝚞𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚜, and means 𝚘𝚏 𝚗𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚋𝚒𝚛𝚝𝚑.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

6/100: In the early 20th Century Eugenics became an academic discipline at universities, organisations were formed and funded to gain public support. The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin, the Cold Spring Harbor in New York rejected the idea that all humans are born equal.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

7/100: Planned Parenthood was formed in America by racial eugenicist Margaret Sanger. President of IBM Thomas Watson established a special subsidiary in Poland - "Watson International Business Machines", assisted in the Nazi invasion in Poland, the operation was managed in N.Y.

Video Transcript AI Summary
EBM headquarters in New York managed punch cards, machinery, training, servicing, and special projects like population census and Aetna identification. To meet the growing need for tabulators, Thomas J. Watson invested $1,000,000 in DMAGS in Germany. This expanded their operations and strengthened their partnership with the Nazi regime. By doing so, they were able to fulfill Germany's increasing demand for tabulators and indirectly support Hitler's expansion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Beginning, the punch cards, machinery, training, servicing, and special project works such as population census, Aetna identification was managed directly by EBM headquarters in New York. But with the increasing need of tabulators, Thomas J. Watson traveled to Germany and invested $1,000,000 into DMAGS to expand their operation and increase their partnership with the Nazi regime. With this, they were able to reproduce the increasing demands of tabulators in Germany and help Hitler in its expansion.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

8/100: The Nazis mentioned the Eugenics program was being run in the US by IBM at the Nuremberg Trials. Watson wasn't further bothered for war crimes, passed on IBM to his son Tom Watson Jr. His granddaughter Jeanette Watson married Margeret Sanger's grandson Alexander Sanger.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

9/100: Bill Gates' father William Henry Gates II worked on the board for Planned Parenthood. His mother Mary Maxwell Gates worked on the corporate board for IBM. Bill Gates partnered with IBM to create @Microsoft.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

10/100: William Gates was also an influential lawyer. Through his father Bill Gates learned the ins and outs of law and politics, how to navigate within the higher echelons of the elites, how to manipulate, how to gain total control.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

11/100: Bill Gates is accredited for the 1st Microsoft OS, in reality he played no part in the invention. "[...] licensed 86-DOS from Tim Paterson of Seattle Computer Products for $50,000 [...], re-licensed it [...] to Big Blue, which marketed it as DOS." https://archive.is/cBxNj

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

12/100: While Microsoft's co-founder Paul Allen was battling with cancer, Bill Gates sensed the perfect opportunity to simply cheat his longtime partner out of the company share - while Paul was - quote - “in the middle of radiation therapy”.

Video Transcript AI Summary
They discussed their intention to greatly reduce my share, which was incredibly shocking and disheartening. At the time, I was still undergoing radiation therapy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're basically talking about how they were planning to dilute my share down to almost nothing. And it was really a shocking and disheartening moment for me. You were sick? Well, I think I was still probably in the middle of radiation therapy.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

13/100: In 1998 Bill Gates’ business strategies came under fire: United States Department of Justice sued @Microsoft for AntiTrust Violation. During the 18 months trial, Gates gave hours over hours of testimony. https://bit.ly/3lZ0F4y

Video Transcript AI Summary
In January 1996, the speaker is asked about non-Microsoft browsers they were concerned about. The speaker seems unsure and asks for clarification on what is meant by "concerned."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What were the non Microsoft browsers that you were concerned about in January of 1996? That month? Yes, sir. And what about it? What non Microsoft browsers you concerned about in January of 1996? I don't know. You mean concerned. What is it about the word concerned that you don't understand?
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

14/100: The judge ruled that Microsoft violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, established to outlaw monopolies/cartels, Microsoft's position in the marketplace constituted a monopoly - threatened not only the competition but also innovation in the industry. https://archive.is/sUQYl

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

15/100: The judge called to divide Microsoft in half. MS appealed, appeals court overturned the decision. Instead of seeking to break up the company, the Justice Department decided to settle w/ the company. MS agreed to share interfaces w/ other companies. https://bit.ly/3d7q6gg

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

16/100: In a move to overshadow the negative press, Bill Gates invested 100 Million Dollars to setup the @gatesfoundation. Overnight Bill Gates was no more the ruthless tech monopolist, the new mantra from now on was: Bill Gates - the most generous philanthropist of the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are pledging an extra $1 billion to this cause. We witnessed a new version of Bill Gates, someone unfamiliar to you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm pleased to announce that we're pledging an additional $1,000,000,000 to this. We had the chance to witness Bill Gates 2.0, the man you don't know.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

17/100: Without even a hint of medical training, Gates styles himself highly as the omniscient demigod of the Life Sciences, a do-gooder, a philanthropist who knows where the planet is headed, population control is now gradually becoming his favourite topic. ¿slǝuɐԀ ✟

Video Transcript AI Summary
Society is facing a trade-off between rapidly rising medical costs and the reluctance to question the value of spending a million dollars on the last three months of a patient's life. This trade-off often leads to the decision of laying off teachers instead of allocating funds to medical expenses. However, discussing this issue is often avoided due to the controversial nature of the topic, commonly referred to as the "death panel."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's just rapidly going away. That's a trade off society is making because of very, very high medical costs and a lack of willingness to say, you know, is spending $1,000,000 on that last 3 months of life for that patient, would it be better not to lay off the those 10 teachers and to make that trade up in medical costs. But that's called the death panel, and you're not supposed to have that discussion.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

18/100: In stark contrast, Gates buys into the very corporations that actually represent the opposite of sustainability, humanism, philanthropy, social health & fairness. His tentacles are everywhere, strategically placed, he acts callously, first collateral damage occurring.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world's largest private philanthropy, is facing criticism for its investments in companies that contribute to social and health problems. With investments in 69 of the worst polluting companies in the U.S. and Canada, the foundation is accused of causing harm while seeking to address these issues. Additionally, other companies in their portfolio have been accused of various transgressions, such as displacing people from their homes, supporting child labor, and neglecting patients in need of medical care.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the world's largest private philanthropy causing harm? The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has made 1,000,000 of dollars each year from companies blamed for many of the same social and health problems the foundation seeks to address. Gates Foundation has investments in 69 of the worst polluting companies in the U. S. And Canada. Other companies in the foundation's portfolio have been accused of transgressions, including forcing thousands of people to lose their homes, supporting child labor defrauding and neglecting patients in need of medical care. The Gates Foundation has now provided

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

19/100: From the start the Foundation is busy investing in governments, pharmaceuticals that the foundation tells the governments to pass money to. Further $$$: petroleum, weapons, media companies (shills), harmful drugs, tobacco. https://archive.is/s3JTf https://bit.ly/3fiXseE

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

20/100: Gates invests into companies that cause harm to ppl, he claims to care about: "[...] Slim & [...] Bill Gates, [...] announced [...] $50 million to Latam health project." "[...] Slim owns Cigatam, which has [...] been 80% owned by Philip Morris." https://bit.ly/31sJqyQ

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

21/100: In 2010 Gates bought 500k+ shares of Monsanto stock worth $ 23 billion, the goal: “feeding the world.” However, something overlooked is how similar the Microsoft & Monsanto business models are, their ability to lock businesses into their products.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charanjit and his family in Northern Indian Punjab bought expensive genetically modified cotton seeds from Monsanto, hoping for higher yields. However, insects destroyed their crops for two consecutive years, leaving them with insurmountable debts of €6,500. Despite the worsening harvests, they continue to use Monsanto seeds as there are limited alternatives available. Monsanto has dominated 95% of the Indian market since entering the country 14 years ago, claiming that farmers prefer their seeds. Activists argue that Monsanto is responsible for the farmers' suicides, accusing the company of deceiving them for higher profits. Pests destroy the cotton, forcing farmers to borrow money to purchase expensive pesticides.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Together with his uncle and brother, Charanjit dreamed of prosperity. So In Northern Indian Punjab, they bought genetically cotton seed from Monsanto. It was expensive but promised a higher yield. Then they took out mortgages to buy a plot of land and lease another. To begin with, the crop was fine. Then 2 years in a row, insects destroyed everything, leaving Charanjit's family with insurmountable debts of €6,500. Since we began using these seeds, our debts have grown. Each year. The harvest just gets worse. And yet they're still using Monsanto seeds. There's hardly anything else available. Monsanto came to India 14 years ago. Since then, the company says itself it's cornered 95% of the market. It claims farmers prefer their seeds. Very strong demand for the world. We have a very strong demand for the world. They are responsible and they are liable for the suicides of the farmers. They lied to them to make more profits. They fooled the people. The activists say it's a vicious with no profits. Pests destroy the cotton, forcing the farmers to use expensive decides, which they have to borrow money to pay for.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

22/100: "[...] 3 million PCs get sold every year in China, [...] ppl don't pay for the software. [...] we want them to steal ours. They’ll get sort of addicted, and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.” https://bit.ly/3cseuoU

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

23/100: Gates Foundation & Microsoft remain inseparable. Indonesia 2008, Wikileaks/Cablegate (2010): “Ambassador requested a meeting [...] w/ the Gates Foundation through a Microsoft contact.” Gates uses “health” as an excuse to have them commit to Microsoft at the same time.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

24/100: Pattern: Gates selects a country with a high illiteracy rate, usually a 3rd world country, monopolizes the NGO sector under the premise of humanitarian aid, such as AIDS: simply claims male genital mutilation could solve AIDS (no scientific basis). ¿ loɹʇuoƆ uoıʇɐlndoԀ

Video Transcript AI Summary
A French scientist in South Africa proved that promoting circumcision services in a township called Orange Farm resulted in over 80% coverage among young men aged 12 to 20. To reduce the need for extensive surgical time, a device called the Shang ring was invented, which allows the procedure to be completed in just a few minutes instead of the usual 30 minutes. While this is not a substitute for a vaccine, it is a cost-effective solution for heavily affected areas. By investing approximately $1 billion, we can promote, roll out, and deliver these circumcisions using the Shang ring, which simplifies the training required and the complexity of the procedure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People said, well, that's interesting. But what are we gonna do about it? I mean, that's kind of a very culturally distinct thing. And, you know, are people even willing to talk about it? Is there any way that you can do it? You need a lot of surgeons. And surgeons, you know, they could make mistakes, and people are sensitive about mistakes. And, you know, this this just may not work. Well, there was a a French scientist in South Africa who took an area called Orange Farm. And he went and proved that if you provided the service, if you promoted it, that the young men who want to come in, say, age sort of 12 to 20, that they would come in. And so he got over 80% coverage of this township area. The question was, what do you do to avoid the need for lots of surgical time? Typically, surgeon would need on the order of 30 minutes per procedure. And so what was invented is this thing. It's called the Shang ring. And what this does is it reduces the time that the surgeon has to be involved, down to a few minutes. Now in no way, it is a substitute for the fact that we want a vaccine. We want a a perfect preventative tool, and we're kinda keep investing in that. But in the meantime, for not too much money, maybe $1,000,000,000 in total, to color all of the heavily affected areas, we can promote, roll out, and deliver, these circumcisions because of this, you know, piece of plastic that completely changes the training required and the complexity.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

25/100: Pattern: Most of the time, these pseudo-scientific test series end in collateral damage that cannot really be quantified. It's assumed that up to 35 million boys/men are affected. The whole thing was based on alleged studies that were "as full of holes as a Swiss cheese".

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern over the failure of a caption project aimed at stopping male genital mutilation in Africa. They highlight the ongoing prevalence of circumcision clinics and call for global partnership to address this issue. The speaker urges everyone to join the struggle against the brutal circumcision imposed on African men. They conclude by thanking the audience for their support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. Because this caption, project, it has really failed. It has been in Uganda here and is actually being questioned everywhere. No. We are here to seek global partnership to help stop male genital mutilation in Africa. There is still a lot to be done in order to thwart the Western NGO's determination to circumcise African men. The ongoing prevalence of circumcision clinics is an indication that this mass mere circumcision is not stopping anytime soon. What are you going to do about it? I call upon everyone to join me in this struggle so that we may fight To end the brutal circumcision that have been imposed on us African. Are you supporting The banning of male's. A 101,000. Thank you.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

26/100: Pattern: Illiterate and poor people are persuaded to participate in Gates' immature vaccination programs with false promises, and again there is collateral damage wherever the eye can see. The next example involves illegal experiments by the Gates Foundation in India.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thousands of tribal girls in India were allegedly used as guinea pigs by two American farmer giants. The report claims that an untested vaccine was given to these girls without proper study or paperwork. The Gates Foundation incentivized Bollywood celebrities to promote mass vaccinations in India, which was severely affected by the vaccine campaign. In 2009, over 24,000 girls were administered the HPV vaccine, often without the informed consent of their parents or guardians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back. Was several Indian tribal girls used as guinea pigs? The report alleges that 2 American farmer giants untested vaccine was administered to thousands of tribal girls without proper study and paperwork. India was among the hardest hit after Bollywood celebrities were incentivized by the Gates Foundation To urge the public to submit to mass vaccinations. In 2009, tribal children were administered the HPV vaccine. Over 24,000 girls were told they were being given wellness shots. In many cases, without the informed consent of a parent or a guardian.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

27/100: Pattern: Again, we're talking about collateral damage of unimaginable proportions, 491k Indian girls, women and babies were affected. The Indian parliament then formed a task force, which expelled @gatesfoundation. They returned to India in the wake of the Corona crisis.

Video Transcript AI Summary
India is criticized for its barbaric practices, but the speaker is surprised to find an American organization operating in a similar manner. The Indian Parliament formed a committee to investigate, which resulted in a scathing report. However, the government officials apologized and allowed the organization to continue their activities. On a positive note, India is developing its own COVID-19 vaccine, with human trials starting in July 2020. The speaker believes that the media and political leaders manipulate public opinion to acquire power and financial gain. They express concern that pharmaceutical companies will exploit India's large population and harm many people. The speaker also laments the lack of justice for girls who have suffered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But India is a barbaric country. Things happen here in a very barbaric way, but I was surprised to find an American organization operating in broad daylight doing things in a very very, let's say, Indian fashion and so the route I took was that I want the whole procedure to be investigated. The Indian Parliament formed a committee and it was to be a rather surprising move because you generally don't often have such a high level inquiry into matters affecting poor people. And that was such an extraordinary report. I don't think the Indian parliament has ever come out, it's such a scathing report and the government officials came up and said, we shouldn't have authorized this. We're sorry. We're not going to allow them again and now they are back doing their same old tricks again. Speaker 1: The good news is that human clinical trials can start As early as July 2020 for India's 1st COVID nineteen indigenous vaccine that's been developed by Bharat Biotech. Speaker 0: So, you can imagine how the manipulation of the media by the media, the manipulation of public opinion by leaders of all political parties unanimously saying, we want a vaccine. And the worst thing is they are taken as philanthropists, whereas what this actually is, is the acquisition of political and financial power and I think the 2nd most populous country with 1,300,000,000 people is going to be a good base for pharmaceutical companies to make a killing and also kill a lot of people in the process. Yes. I just find it a pity that we haven't been able to get any benefit for the girls who suffered, you know. It's so terrifying as to what they're actually doing with the world.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

28/100: "[...] the 491,000 additional cases of paralysis would not have been noticed otherwise." "Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India" @NCBI. Gates couldn't buy that one away into oblivion. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/

Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India The last case of polio from India was reported in 2011. That year, the non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) rate in India was 13.35/100,000, where the expected rate is 1–2/100,000. A previous study of data from 2000 to 2010 has detailed the ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

29/100: Pattern: In the past two decades it is almost impossible to find areas concerning "global health initiatives" that have been left untouched by the @gatesfoundation. They've managed to sneak their tentacles everywhere, we're talking about monopolization of the sciences.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has played a significant role in various global health initiatives. They sponsored the creation of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, which aims to establish healthy markets for vaccines. The foundation provided substantial funding to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, as well as supported efforts to eliminate neglected tropical diseases. They were also a founding partner of the Global Financing Facility for women, children, and adolescents, contributing $275 million. Additionally, the Gates Foundation injected $100 million into the Coalition For Epidemic Preparedness Innovations to develop vaccines for emerging infectious diseases. Their influence can be seen in numerous major global health initiatives over the past two decades.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Indeed, it would be almost impossible to find any area of global health that has been left untouched by the tentacles of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It was Gates who sponsored the meeting that led to the creation of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, a global public private partnership bringing together state sponsors and big pharmaceutical companies whose specific goals include the creation of healthy markets for vaccines and other immunization products. As a founding partner of the Alliance, The Gates Foundation provided $750,000,000 in seed funding and has gone on to make over $4,100,000,000 in commitments to the group. Gates provided the seed money that created the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, a Public Private Partnership that acts as a finance vehicle for governmental AIDS, TB and malaria programs. When a public private partnership of governments, world health bodies, and 13 leading pharmaceutical companies came together in 2012 To accelerate progress toward eliminating or controlling 10 neglected tropical diseases, there was the Gates Foundation with $363,000,000 of support. When the Global Financing Facility for women, children, and adolescents was launched in 2015 to leverage 1,000,000,000 of dollars in public and private financing for global health and development programs. There was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as a founding partner with a $275,000,000 contribution. When the Coalition For Epidemic Preparedness Innovations was launched at the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2017 to develop vaccines against emerging infectious diseases, There was the Gates Foundation with an initial injection of $100,000,000. The examples go on and on. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's fingerprints can be seen on every major global health initiative of the past 2 decades.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

30/100: Bill Gates supposedly philanthropic motives are not of altruistic nature as many would want you to believe. His master plan is calculated through in a very precise manner, the goal is "endless cash flow", without taxation hurdles. “20:1 return rate”.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the past 20 years, $10 billion has been invested in vaccinations, resulting in a remarkable return on investment of 20 to 1. This economic benefit far surpasses other options, such as investing in the S&P 500, which would have yielded around $17 billion with reinvested dividends. However, the impact of vaccinations is estimated to be even greater, potentially reaching $200 billion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've invested $10,000,000,000 in vaccinations over the last 2 decades and you figured out the return on investment for that. And it kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math? Over a 20 to 1 return. So if you just looked at the economic benefits, that's a pretty strong number compared to anything else. Take the numbers that you ran through where if you had put that money into an S&P 500 and reinvested the dividends? You'd come up with something like $17,000,000,000, but you think it's $200,000,000,000 here.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

31/100: Gates is the top donor to @WHO, @CDCgov & all other global health initiatives. @gatesfoundation is the single most influential entity on the planet when it comes to global health strategies & masterplans. Those who receive his money, chant the mantra without hesitance.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates, a top donor to the WHO and CDC, holds significant power in influencing global health and medical freedom. He believes that normalcy can only be achieved when the entire global population is largely vaccinated. Until a vaccine is developed, returning to normal would put lives at risk. It is crucial to produce and distribute the vaccine worldwide. The focus is on vaccinating children and pregnant women, developing new vaccines and therapeutics. The necessary syringes have already been purchased, and plans are being made for deployment. The military is also being mobilized as part of this effort.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: William H. Gates, the third, and Melinda Franke. As a top donor to both the WHO and the CDC, no one man has more power than Bill Gates to influence and control the health and medical freedom of all people. Normalcy only returns When we've largely vaccinated the entire global population. This will be the new normal Until a vaccine is developed. Until we find a vaccine, going back to normal means putting lives at risk. Speaker 1: We need to produce it and to deploy it in every single corner of the world, Speaker 0: full vaccination of our children and pregnant women, development of new vaccines, therapeutics, We've already bought the syringes. We already know where it's gonna happen. We're thinking about what that's going to be. It's all part of this plan. Our military is now being mobilized.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

32/100: Gates even requested @gavi membership of the @WHO executive board in 2017, therefore gained treaty signing powers, has absolute diplomatic immunity in its host country Switzerland and puts GAVI equal to the Bank for International Settlements & the European Central Bank.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Stuckelberger reveals that Bill Gates ensured Gavi, his organization involved in vaccination, gained membership on the World Health Organization executive board in 2017. This gave Gavi a significant influence, bypassing proper international law channels. Additionally, Dr. Stuckelberger explains that Gavi, unlike other diplomatic bodies, possesses absolute diplomatic immunity in Switzerland, where it operates. This immunity extends to its premises and computers, placing Gavi on the same level as banks like the Bank for International Settlements and the European Central Bank. Consequently, even if there is strong evidence of a serious crime, Gavi and these banks cannot be searched.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Stuckelberger goes on to say that Bill Gates requested that his organization, Gavi, should we say the big money, the substate or or outside the state money involved vaccination. Gavi should have membership of the World Health Organization executive board in 2017. And as one of the lawyers listening to doctor Stuckelberger remarks, VATs ironically. This turned Gavi and, basically, into Bill Gates' Istanbul. And this allowed de facto, So it never went in through the proper international law channels. But doctor Schuylberger says that in practice, you now have 3 parties signing WHO contracts and treaties with individual member states. And the third party is Bill Gates, who's basically giving himself the equivalent of country status. What else does she say? She says that Gavi has a grade of diplomatic immunity in Switzerland, where she has spent most of her career, that is higher than most diplomatic bodies themselves. Most other bodies, the standard grade of immunity you get in international law is qualified diplomatic immunity, meaning if you murder someone, it will be lifted. Gavi has absolute diplomatic immunity for its premises and computers. And as there is some discussion in English that people can listen to in the testimony between Doctor. Stuckelberger and the very well educated and well enunciated German lawyers. This puts Gavi on a par with banks such as, and they named them, the Bank for International Settlements, Switzerland based and the Frankfurt, Germany based European Central Bank. And the lawyers around the table say, yes, I'm aware of these unusual exceptions fact, that mean that even if there is egregious probable cause for a warrant to go and find out where a grave crime has been committed, the the banks in question, international banks and Gavi, cannot be searched.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

33/100: Gates has trouble not getting caught up in outlandish conclusions or wrapping his megalomaniacal plans in more crowd-pleasing verbiage. This TED-talk already went around the world, under the pretext of global health a more sustainable population control is thought aloud.

Video Transcript AI Summary
To achieve zero CO2 emissions, we need to focus on reducing four factors: population, individual consumption, energy efficiency, and carbon intensity. Currently, the world has 6.8 billion people, which is projected to increase to around 9 billion. By improving healthcare, reproductive services, and vaccines, we could potentially decrease the population by 10-15%. This reduction in population would contribute to lowering CO2 emissions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to 0. And that's going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy on average for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let's look at each one of these and see how we can get this down to 0. Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to 0. That's Back from high school algebra. But let's take a look. First we've got population. The world today has 6,800,000,000 people. That's headed up to about $9,000,000,000. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

34/100: Again we have to look back into history, the Kissinger Report, 1974 (https://bit.ly/3sFk9gQ): "Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth."

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

35/100: Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller's partner: “Who controls the food supply controls the people.” 2006: @gatesfoundation & @RockefellerFdn launched the $424 million Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) intertwined with vaccines. https://t.co/AUdyT9dCRb

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

36/100: Polio vaccine programs for Africa should be the saviour of the world now according to Bill & Melinda Gates. The outcome: collateral damages, highly alarmed African population who didn't want to be used as guinea pigs anymore. https://t.co/Bbgmz9TQTe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister Gates settled on Africa for his own agenda, not because he cares about the people there. Africans are tired of being used as lab rats for big pharma and are raising awareness on social media. The American government's Kissinger report from the mid-1970s aimed to reduce Africa's population to control its mineral resources. Foreign powers are making a concerted effort to control Africa's population. Unfortunately, some children died from botched vaccinations, while others survived but were injured. People should believe the parents who claim their children were harmed by big pharma, as they will never stop fighting for their kids.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Eyes of all the places that mister Gates could have gone in the world. Why did he settle on Africa? It's not because he cares about people that look like me. He cares about an agenda. African bodies have been used as lab rats for many years for big pharma. They are using us for trial. They are using us for testing. But as an African, I say no more. Speaker 1: Africans, they're tired of becoming the guinea pigs of the world. Their antennas are raised, and they're telling each other all over social media. They're on high alert right now. Speaker 2: There is a policy of the American government. It's called the Kissinger report, which was produced in the mid seventies. And it explicitly states that, the purpose of the foreign policy in Africa was to reduce the population Because they have great mineral resources there. And the time at Kissinger and those involved with the administration Wanted to shrink the population, make sure that the Africans do not develop and do not use the resources for themselves, because we in this space, we need them. There is a concerted effort of foreign powers to control the population of Africa. Some children did survive the botched vaccinations last month and will recover, but 15 all under the age of 5 died from fever, Vomiting and diarrhea, human errors contributed to the unfortunate deaths of the children. Speaker 1: How can you believe big pharma But not believe these parents when they tell you that their children have been injured by big pharma. I don't care how big this corporate machine looks. As a parent, I can tell you, these people will never stop fighting for their kids.
Saved - November 10, 2023 at 10:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the late 1960s, India faced a severe food shortage. Indira Gandhi, the Prime Minister, sought help from the US, but they demanded population control measures in return. This led to the implementation of sterilization quotas and coercive tactics, causing immense suffering and human rights violations. However, these measures did not effectively address India's population growth. The Green Revolution, driven by advancements in agriculture, ultimately brought food security to India. Despite the failed predictions of overpopulation and resource scarcity, some continue to advocate for population control, neglecting the potential of human innovation and the importance of empowering developing nations.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

« Il faut réduire la population pour sauver la planète » C’était déjà l’idée prônée par certains adeptes de la décroissance, à la fin des années 60. Peu après, en Inde, les hommes fuyaient leurs maisons pour se cacher dans les champs... #Thread 🔽🔽🔽

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Quand Indira Gandhi, fille de Nehru, arrive au pouvoir en 1966, elle hérite d’un pays usé par la guerre, où la famine menace. Pour nourrir la population, il manque 20 millions de tonnes de grain, et les caisses sont vides.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Elle n’a pas le choix. Il lui faut quémander une aide alimentaire aux États Unis. Mais le moment est très mal choisi. On vient de remettre à Lyndon Johnson un rapport fantaisiste, censé prouver que les enfants du tiers monde présentent une "valeur économique négative".

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Séduit, Johnson déclare que "5$ investis dans le contrôle des naissances valent 100$ investis dans la croissance économique". Il s’empresse de faire voter une loi qui conditionne toute aide américaine à la stérilisation des plus pauvres.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Et crée le "Bureau de la population", avec le Dr Reimert Ravenholt à sa tête. Épidémiologiste raciste et misanthrope, il considère la grossesse comme une maladie à éradiquer, au même titre que la variole ou la fièvre jaune, et imprime ses cartes de visite sur des préservatifs.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Lors de sa rencontre avec la 1ère ministre indienne, Johnson lui fait savoir qu’il ne va pas “gaspiller l’aide étrangère américaine pour des nations qui refusent de traiter leurs problèmes de surpopulation”. Indira n’a d’autre choix que de capituler.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Immédiatement, des quotas de stérilisation sont mis en place dans chaque État indien. Les hôpitaux du pays voient une grande partie de leurs équipements réquisitionnés. Les soins courants en pâtissent, mais les quotas sont drastiques.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Comme cela ne suffit pas, des centaines de camps sont mis en place dans les zones rurales. Du personnel paramédical, formé en quelques jours, doit y effectuer 150 vasectomies ou 300 implantations de stérilets par mois, sous peine de voir son salaire amputé.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Des « motivateurs » indépendants sont recrutés, et des primes sont versées aux patients volontaires : 2 à 3 $ pour un stérilet, 8 à 16 $ pour une stérilisation définitive. Dans un pays où le salaire d’un ouvrier est de 2$/jour, ce n’est pas si dérisoire.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

En fin de mois, certains états privent d’eau les villages qui n’atteignent pas leurs quotas. Des millions de pauvres, voyant leurs cultures menacées et se profiler la famine, n’ont d’autre choix que de se soumettre aux bistouris d’état.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Les résultats sont impressionnants. Alors qu’il était de 100 000/an au début de la décennie, le nombre total de stérilisations atteint plus de 1,8 millions en 1967-68. Johnson peut être fier de lui.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Mais, si elle ruine l’existence de millions de personnes, cette campagne n’a que peu d’effet sur la croissance démographique Indienne. C’est ce que regrette Paul Ehrlich dans un ouvrage qui marque un véritable tournant dans l’action malthusienne : « La Bombe Démographique ».

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Il y développe une idée simple : la croissance de la population dépasse de loin la quantité de ressources disponibles. Et ses prévisions sont sans appel : "Dans les années 1970, des centaines de millions de personnes mourront de faim".

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Il a plusieurs idées : ajouter des stérilisants temporaires à l'approvisionnement en eau ou aux aliments de base. Ou organiser un système de "triage" des pays, conditionnant l’aide alimentaire au contrôle de la démographie.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Pour l’Inde, son opinion est faite : "aucun expert [ne] pense qu’elle sera autosuffisante sur le plan alimentaire en 1971, ou même qu’elle le sera un jour", écrit-il. Elle est "si loin derrière dans le jeu de la population et de la nourriture qu'il n'y a aucun espoir."

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Il a pourtant tout faux : l’autosuffisance alimentaire, l’Inde l’atteint précisément en 1971. Non pas par le contrôle de sa démographie, mais grâce à un autre chantier qu’Indira a lancé : la révolution verte. https://thewire.in/agriculture/food-security-green-revolution

India's Food Security Is Thanks to the Green Revolution. Let Us Not Deny It Science helped India feed itself. Now, there is a clear need for re-imagination for Indian agriculture to bring it in consonance with the ecological requirement of various regions. thewire.in

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Grâce aux progrès de l’industrie chimique, qui fournit produits phytos et engrais, à la mécanisation et à de nouvelles variétés hybrides, les rendements agricoles explosent. Et si écologiquement tout n’est pas parfait, un objectif inestimable est atteint : l’Inde mange à sa faim

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Mieux, les paysans s’enrichissent : le Punjab, grenier à grain du pays, devient progressivement l'un des Etats les plus riches du sous-continent. En 30 ans, le revenu annuel par habitant y passera de 60 à 440 dollars, bien au-dessus de la moyenne nationale.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Ses prévisions indiennes ne seront pas le seul fourvoiement d’Ehrlich. Il prédit que les USA devront rationner l’eau en 74, que les pesticides feront chuter l’espérance de vie des Américains à 42 ans dans les années 80, ou encore que l’Angleterre aura disparue avant l’an 2000…

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Pourtant, son discours apocalyptique fait de nombreux émules. En 68, Robert McNamara, fervent malthusien, prend la présidence de la Banque Mondiale. Lui aussi décide de lier prêts et aide humanitaire à une politique de natalité rigoureuse.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Le budget du bureau de Ravenholt passe de 36 à 120 millions de $. Pour compenser, on coupe dans les programmes d’aide médicale, qui tombent de 130 à 38… L'Amérique ne cherche plus à éradiquer la pauvreté, mais à éradiquer les pauvres.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Les ressources sont finies, il ne faut pas les gâcher. Ravenholdt et son bureau deviennent les précurseurs des cuistres climatiques, sillonnant le monde en première classe, de palace en palace, pour prôner la sobriété…

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

En 70, Nixon nomme à la tête d’une commission spéciale sur la croissance démographique un fervent partisan du contrôle des naissances, John D. Rockefeller III. Par le passé, la fondation Rockefeller a en effet financé les programmes eugénistes nazis.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Inspiré par les idées d’Henry Ford, Hitler avait organisé l'"euthanasie" des enfants handicapés, des malades mentaux ou incurables, et un programme de stérilisations contraintes - 400 000 entre 1933 et 45. https://www.geo.fr/voyage/nazisme-aktion-t4-la-mise-a-mort-des-inutiles-161366

Nazisme : Aktion T4, la mise à mort des "inutiles" Dès 1939, le IIIe Reich mène une vaste entreprise d’euthanasie envers les handicapés, qui préfigure l’extermination systématique des juifs trois ans plus... geo.fr

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

En 72, le Club de Rome publie un rapport qui fait grand bruit : The Limits To Growth. Lui aussi considère que les ressources naturelles vont s’épuiser sous les coups de la croissance démographique et économique.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Il pose les bases des concepts de "croissance infinie dans un monde fini" ou du "jour du dépassement". Ses conclusions sont aussi catastrophistes que celles d’Ehrlich : si rien n’est fait, le système économique mondial s’effondrera en 2030, entraînant une véritable hécatombe.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

C’est dans ce contexte que Rockefeller remet son premier rapport, suivit 2 ans plus tard par un autre, commandé à H. Kissinger. Les 2 préconisent toute une série de mesures coercitives, pour contrer la hausse du nombre "d’assistés & de criminels qui seraient un fardeau".

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Un mémo complémentaire conseille même de rationner les denrées alimentaires ou d’utiliser l’armée contre les pays les plus récalcitrants. Ceux qui pensent que les grands capitalistes voient la démographie comme une opportunité de main d’œuvre à bas prix en sont pour leurs frais…

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Dans le même temps, l’Inde subit de plein fouet le choc pétrolier. En 1975, l’état d’urgence est déclaré. Indira Gandhi s’octroie les pleins pouvoir, musèle la presse et les dissidents. Mais une fois de plus, elle se retrouve à la merci de l’aide internationale.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

A la Banque Mondiale, McNamara est très clair : si l’Inde veut de nouveaux prêts, elle devra régler d’une manière plus radicale son prétendu problème démographique. Au lieu de mesures incitatives, la force sera désormais employée.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Son fils Sanjay est chargé de mener l’offensive. Et il prend sa tâche très à cœur.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

La stérilisation devient une condition à l’attribution des terres, à l’accès à l’eau, à l’électricité, aux cartes de rationnement, aux soins médicaux, aux augmentations de salaire et même aux permis de cyclo-pousse.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

On donne aux policiers des quotas de rafles à effectuer dans les foyers les plus pauvres. Des escadrons de démolition partent raser les bidonvilles et expédier les occupants vers les camps.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Les vasectomies y sont pratiquées dans un manque d’hygiène effroyable. Les infections se multiplient chez des patients qu’on jette sans ménagement à la rue. Certains y perdent leurs jambes, que la gangrène ne laisse le choix que d’amputer.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Dans la seule ville de Delhi, sept cent mille personnes sont expulsées de leurs foyers. Ceux qui parviennent à s’échapper ne récupèrent leur logement que lorsqu’ils se soumettent.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Des manifestations de résistance éclatent. La police n’hésite pas à les réprimer par la force, tirant à balles réelles sur la foule. Des milliers de personnes y perdent la vie.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Le village de Pipli ne plie que lorsqu’on le menace de bombardements aériens. https://www.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/four-decades-of-emergency-pipli-live-through-the-eyes-of-dogged-taus-of-haryana/story-ENNvgJpEYBCPrDI4GhyCMM_amp.html

Four decades of Emergency: ‘Pipli Live’ through the eyes of dogged Taus of Haryana At a stone’s throw away from the National Capital, Pipli on Delhi-Kharkhauda road could well pass on as the fabled Peepli village which provided the backdrop for Aamir Khan produced satirical film, Peepli Live. It is actually not hindustantimes.com

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Ravenholt se précipite dans la péninsule. Il y distribue des endoscopes modernes, qui permettent de réaliser 12 800 vasectomies / jour. En 1976, c’est 6,2 millions d’Indiens qui sont stérilisées.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Loin d’être consternée par les violations massives des droits de l’homme, la communauté internationale applaudit. McNamara se rend en Inde pour féliciter le gvt d’Indira Gandhi. "Enfin," dit-il, "l’Inde prend des mesures efficaces pour régler son problème de surpopulation"

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

La Première Ministre obtient ses prêts, mais est chassée du pouvoir l’année suivante. Le peuple Indien, indigné, inflige une défaite cinglante à son parti, au pouvoir depuis trois décennies.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Cette période engendre en Inde un profond et durable rejet de la vasectomie. Mais dans le même temps, de nouvelles techniques de stérilisation féminine sont mises au point. Des programmes visant la "santé des femmes" déplacent vers elles le contrôle de la natalité.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Encore aujourd’hui, la tubectomie, ou ligature des trompes, est le moyen de contraception le plus répandu dans les classes populaires. Faute de moyens, l’accès régulier à une pilule contraceptive n’y est pas aisé.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Si l’Inde abandonne officiellement ses quotas en 1996, la pression est encore mise sur les professionnels de santé. La fin de l’année fiscale est nommée "saison de la stérilisation". https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/07/12/india-target-driven-sterilization-harming-women

India: Target-Driven Sterilization Harming Women hrw.org

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

En 2012, 53 femmes ont été stérilisées en l’espace de deux heures dans l’Etat du Bihar, dans les locaux d’un collège sans accès à l’eau courante ou à du matériel de stérilisation. L’année suivante, l’Etat a déclaré envisager l’ouverture de 13.000 camps de stérilisation.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Début 2013, au Bengale-Occidental, plus de 100 femmes ont été abandonnées, inconscientes, dans un champ après une opération de stérilisation collective qui avait mal tourné. slate.fr/story/94723/st…

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

En 2014, 11 femmes sont mortes à la suite d'une de ces campagnes. Elles avaient été payées 600 roupies, soit une dizaine de dollars. La semaine précédente, 83 femmes avaient été opérées en 6h par un seul chirurgien. 68 ont été traitées pour choc septique.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Pourtant, un célèbre pari aurait dû définitivement clore les thèses catastrophistes d’Ehrlich ou du Club de Rome. L’économiste Julian Simon, théoricien de l'écologie de marché, ne croyait pas du tout au problème de la surpopulation ni à l’épuisement des ressources.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Il pensait que l'humanité pouvait s'adapter aux conditions changeantes, que la créativité humaine améliorerait le niveau de vie et que la plupart des ressources étaient remplaçables. Que leur prix diminuerait au fil du temps et de l’évolution des techniques.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Ehrlich, riant de ce « techno-solutionnisme », était au contraire persuadé qu’elles seraient de plus en plus rares, et donc de plus en plus chères.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Sûr de lui, il accepta de parier sur la tendance des prix des ressources au cours d'une période de dix ans. Simon, encore plus sûr de son fait, lui laissa choisir les dix produits qu'il pensait se raréfier. Au terme du pari, leur prix moyen avait diminué d'environ 30% ...

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Si on étend la durée du pari à la période 1900 - 2019, le prix du panier d’Ehrlich a baissé de 87%. Alors que la population mondiale a augmenté de 375%. https://www.humanprogress.org/luck-or-insight-the-simon-ehrlich-bet-re-examined/

Luck or Insight? The Simon-Ehrlich Bet Re-Examined humanprogress.org

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Mieux, les gagnants de cette abondance sont les gens ordinaires. Un ouvrier doit aujourd’hui travailler 8 fois moins qu’en 1900 pour acquérir le fameux panier. Et les famines n’ont jamais été si peu nombreuses que depuis qu’elles ont été annoncées par Ehrlich ou le Club de Rome.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Car production agricole continue d’augmenter, inexorablement. Et depuis 20 ans, avec de moins en moins de surfaces cultivées.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Pourtant, de nos jours, de nouveaux prophètes de l’apocalypse, jouant sur la peur du réchauffement climatique, reprennent mot pour mot le discours d’Ehrlich.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jean-Marc Jancovici discusses the issue of population growth and the need for birth control. With the planet already exceeding its limits with over 6 billion people, he believes that nature or the planet itself will regulate the population through pandemics, famines, and conflicts if we don't take action. He emphasizes the importance of discussing and addressing this difficult topic, suggesting that it would be better for us to take control of the situation and implement birth control measures ourselves, both in France and globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Question qu'on n'a pas abordé avec vous Jean-Marc Jancovici ce matin, c'est celle de la démographie, on sera bientôt dix milliards d'êtres humains sur terre, est-ce qu'à un moment ou à un autre, il faudra se poser la question de la limitation des naissances Speaker 1: La nature ne n'acceptera aura pas exactement la planète terre n'acceptera pas qu'on ait dix milliards d'habitants sur terre ad vitam aeternam vivant comme aujourd'hui puisqu'on a dépassé 6 limites planétaires déjà. Donc la seule question c'est comment va se faire la régulation Ou bien on essaye de la gérer au moins mal nous-mêmes Ou bien ça se fera de manière spontané par des pandémies, des famines et des conflits qui favoriseront ces deux modes de régulation Speaker 0: Donc la réponse est oui, il faudra Speaker 1: Non, oui. Speaker 0: Si on veut éviter des il faudra le faire nous-mêmes Donc Speaker 1: oui il vaudrait mieux s'en occuper et il vaudrait mieux en discuter même si c'est un débat difficile. Il faudrait le faire nous-mêmes en France Partout.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Ces partisans de la décroissance voient leurs plans contrariés : les pays riches ont atteint un niveau de développement qui leur permet de continuer à croître, tout en réduisant leurs émissions de CO2.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

La France est revenue à son niveau d’émission d’il y a 60 ans, malgré une population 1,5 fois plus nombreuse.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

En diminuant les capacités d’investissement dans la recherche et la transition énergétique, la décroissance a toute les chances d’y être contreproductive. Le GIEC ne s’y trompe pas, et rejette tous les scénarios décroissants.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Les pays en développement, eux, n’ont évidemment aucune intention de décroître. Le contrôle de leur population est donc le dernier levier actionnable par les idéologues.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Il serait pourtant plus logique qu’ils les encourage à croître : Sur le chemin de la prospérité, il y a un point de bascule où un enfant cesse d’être un bras pour devenir un désir, et une charge. Ce ne sont jamais les classes moyennes que l’on stérilise…

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

"Les pays riches (…) ont le devoir moral de jouer un rôle de premier plan dans le contrôle de la population." pensait Ehrlich. Notre véritable devoir moral, c’est celui d’innover, et de diffuser ces innovations.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Les tristes prophètes qui ont si peur de manquer de ressources, négligent la plus précieuse de toutes : l’intelligence humaine. Les défis qui attendent l’humanité n’ont peut-être jamais été aussi grands : heureusement, nous n’avons jamais été aussi nombreux pour les affronter.

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

#Fin PS : Il serait très injuste de parler de l’eugénisme de la fondation Rockefeller sans évoquer son apport considérable à la révolution verte : https://www.agdaily.com/insights/brief-history-of-the-green-revolution-norman-borlaug/

A brief history of the Green Revolution | AGDAILY Norman Borlaug made three wheat breeding innovations that foreshadowed his remarkable contributions to feeding the world and the Green Revolution. agdaily.com

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Pour en savoir plus sur lea actions de contrôle de la démographie par les états-unis : https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-population-control-holocaust

The Population Control Holocaust Robert Zubrin reveals the international campaign of coerced sterilization and abortion thenewatlantis.com

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

Ou sur les campagnes de stérilisation en Inde. https://qz.com/india/1414774/the-legacy-of-indias-quest-to-sterilise-millions-of-men/

The legacy of India’s quest to sterilise millions of men In the 1970s, the Indian government was under international pressure to control its population—and took drastic action. qz.com

@Cobra_FX_ - Cobra effect

@HL_iberty @Qraaal @RauxJF @MonsieurGypaete @emma_ducros @MacLesggy @agritof80 @GeWoessner @ZeClint @rageousB @Max__lib @atlantico_fr @Pascal_Beuvelet

Saved - May 9, 2023 at 3:13 PM

@backtolife_2023 - Wittgenstein

Dennis Meadows, one of the original members of the Club of Rome & co-author of 'Limits to Growth' (1972) speaking openly about how the population must be reduced to 1-2 billion & mentions epidemics as a possibility. Source: Muh World (YouTube)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that the global population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They express a desire for a civil and peaceful decline in population, where conflicts are resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. They mention that having more people would require a strong and smart dictatorship, which is unlikely. The speaker hopes for a slow and equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing it on others. They admit that these hopes may be pessimistic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But in one way or another, we are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another, it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way. And I mean civil in a special way. Peaceful. Peace doesn't mean, that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through force, but rather in other ways. And so, that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet, can support something like a 1000000000 people? Maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, if you can have more people, I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000, probably, if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships, they're always stupid. But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a But We want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich trying to force everybody else to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know, but, that's that's what lies ahead.
Saved - July 27, 2023 at 7:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Malone reveals that the US government's official policy is to limit population growth to 8 billion. Documents and receipts confirm their intent to employ various methods such as birth control, abortion, and population reduction technologies. Yuval Noah Harari questions the necessity of such a large human population. Watch Dr. Malone's analysis on population control via the provided link. A new video from Bannon supports this claim.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

🚨 Dr. Malone Drops a Bomb: “Population Control Is Official Policy Of US Government” “Documents reveal that capping population growth at 8 billion is official US policy,” reported Dr. @RWMaloneMD. “So we now have a series of documents and receipts that lay out the real political logic that the US should act through a variety of different means, including birth control, advancing abortion, and advancing technologies for reduction in population.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the COVID crisis, there has been a theory that population control is an underlying agenda. Official US government documents dating back to 1973 reveal that population control to cap global growth at 8 billion is US policy. The logic behind this is to suppress population growth in least developed countries that the US wishes to exploit for resources. This theory is based on the idea that the Earth has limited resources and can only sustain a certain number of human beings. The goal is to use various means, including birth control and abortion, to limit population growth. These documents support the theory and raise questions about the intentions behind it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Steve, it has been considered a conspiracy theory during the COVID crisis that one of the underlying agendas during the COVID crisis has been a surreptitious population control. And I've been very reluctant to go there as have many others, but it has been a leading theory of the case in addition to the economic one. Now what we have is a series of documents. These are the receipts in the official government policy, US government policy, going back to Henry Kissinger in a preceding meeting in 1973, it clearly documents that population control to cap US to cap global growth at 8,000,000,000 is official US policy and has been for a long time. And it's couched in a lot of real politic language, and then was made official policy under Gerald forward with an additional national security directive. So we now have a series of of documents and receipts that lay out the real politic logic that, the US should act through a variety of different means including birth control, advancing abortion, and advancing technologies for reduction in population, switching, agricultural practices, a whole series of actions tensions proposed. And it's also couched in the logic that we need to suppress population growth in least developed countries that we wish to Basically mine for mineral resources. We don't want those countries to grow their populations because it would compete with our interests in extracting mineral wealth and other things from those countries. Speaker 1: Is this, we got about a minute before we go. Is this, is this in, Is this in response to was the population bomb as Professor Erhardt, I think it was, Eckert at Stanford, the population bomb back in the sixties seventies. His theory of the case that the carrying capacity of the earth was only so many human beings? Speaker 0: Precisely. And just like agenda 2030, what we C is a legacy logic that has largely been debunked based in this case on Malthusianism that we have very limited resources that discount sources that discount human innovation and the value of human capital and human intellectual contributions. And believe that the only way out of this, catastrophic event, this existential crisis is to use extraordinary means to cap population growth, which includes mandated birth control, etcetera, if necessary, if we move above 8,000,000,000. And what's ironic or not, this feeds into the quote conspiracy theory is that In 2020, we were just approaching 8,000,000,000 as the target. So, there's a lot of receipts and documents here that Much support.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here's Yuval Noah Harari, Barack Obama's favorite author and advisor to Klaus Schwab, asking, "What do we need SO MANY humans for?"

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the question of why we need so many humans in the 21st century. They suggest that keeping humans happy with drugs and computer games in a virtual world called the metaverse could be a solution. They also mention the possibility of a new useless class of humans. Speaker 1 talks about the world's population, which is currently around 6.8 billion and expected to reach 9 billion. They mention that improving healthcare and reproductive health services could potentially lower the population by 10 or 15 percent. Speaker 1 also emphasizes that government agencies are not involved in any conspiracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then the big political and economic question of the 21st century will be, what do we need humans for? Or at least, what do we need so many humans for? Do you have an answer in the book? At present, the best guess we have is, keep them happy with drugs and computer games. We call this the metaverse. Speaker 1: What you guys do in here? Pretty much everything that you would do in the real world. Speaker 0: Or at least, what do we need so many humans for? Would constitute a new useless class? When I say that these are useless humans, it's not from the viewpoint of the mother, of the wife, of the of the son, or at least, what do we need so many humans for? Speaker 1: 1st, we've got population. Uh-uh the world today has 6,800,000,000 people. That's headed up to about 9,000,000,000. Now if we do a really great job on New vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services. We could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 0: Or at least, what do we need so many humans for? Speaker 1: Forget the conspiracy. Listen to our government agencies. These guys are telling the truth. You know, there's no conspiracy here, folks. Just get your damn pain? Alright. Thank you,

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. you agree with Dr. Malone's analysis? That population control is official policy of the US government? Original clip via the link below: https://rumble.com/v32hru8-dr.-robert-malone-population-control-is-official-policy-of-us-government..html

Dr. Robert Malone: ‘Population Control Is Official Policy Of US Government.’ Dr. Robert Malone: ‘Population Control Is Official Policy Of US Government.’ rumble.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Cynthia_Carter @RWMaloneMD Perhaps, but this video from Bannon is brand new.

Saved - September 2, 2023 at 5:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
UN Messenger of Peace Jane Goodall urges reducing global population to 450 million, a 95% decrease from today. Population growth is the root cause of many problems we face. Solutions would be easier with a population size similar to 500 years ago. Source: [link] For more content, visit [link]. #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
We should reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it contributes to many other problems. If our population size resembled that of 500 years ago, many of the challenges we face today would not exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Saved - September 11, 2023 at 9:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2008, Bill Gates discussed his aim to lower mortality rates in developing nations at the WEF. However, some claim he intends to depopulate these regions through vaccines. To explore this further, visit wideawakemedia.com. Additionally, a discount code, TWITTER15, is available for a limited time on wideawakeclothing.com. Check out their bestselling t-shirts, including "You Are the Carbon They Want to Reduce."

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking at the WEF in 2008, Bill Gates tells Klaus Schwab about his mission to depopulate the third world, by "reducing the mortality rates of common diseases". Translation: I will reduce the population of developing countries by sterilising everybody with my "vaccines", under the guise of reducing the mortality rate of common diseases. Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ql-Mtlx31e8… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #BillGates #KlausSchwab #WorldEconomicForum #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, Speaker 1 discusses their ambitious goals for the new work they are involved in. They aim to make a significant impact on at least half of the 20 diseases targeted by their global health program within 15 years. By doing so, they hope to greatly reduce mortality rates in developing countries, which would in turn lead to a decrease in population growth. This positive outcome would make other areas such as education and nutrition much easier to address. Speaker 1 expresses their high expectations for the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What would you like to see as your legacy in 10, 15 years? Speaker 1: Of the new work? Speaker 0: Of the new work. Yes. If you're a new function. Speaker 1: Well, I've set very ambitious goals I'm quite optimistic. If you look at, say, the 20 diseases that our global health program goes after, I'd hope that within 15 years, over half of those We could have had a very dramatic impact. You know, huge change in the, mortality rates in developing countries, Which then has this effect of reducing population growth. That's the this big benefit that then makes everything like Education and nutrition a lot easier. So I I have very high expectations
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

T-shirt available here: https://wideawake.clothing/collections/best-sellers-tshirts?filter.v.price.gte=&filter.v.price.lte=&sort_by=best-selling Use discount code 'TWITTER15' for 15% off (first 20 customers only)!

Best Sellers (T-Shirts) Some of our best selling t-shirts. Click here for our best selling hoodies. wideawake.clothing

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

https://wideawake.clothing/products/you-are-the-carbon-they-want-to-reduce-t-shirt

"You Are The Carbon They Want To Reduce" T-Shirt All our designs are applied to premium quality Gildan t-shirts and hoodies, using our top of the line, direct to garment digital printers. All t-shirt colours are 100% cotton, except for 'sports grey' (90% cotton/10% polyester) and 'dark heather' (50% cotton/50% polyester). Hoodies are 50% cotton/50% polyester. We prin wideawake.clothing
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 1:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ted Turner, a friend of Bill Gates, the WEF, UN, and WHO, discussed the urgent need to address population growth, pollution, and climate change. Their motivation is self-preservation and greed, aiming to eliminate 90% of the world population. They justify their actions for the greater good, poisoning us subtly with vaccines and toxins while distracting us with entertainment and drugs. We must speak out against these crimes and bring them to justice. Turner suggests an ideal population of 250-300 million, a drastic decline from current levels.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

15 years ago, Ted Turner, a friend of Bill Gates, the WEF, United Nations, WHO, and all the other climate cultist population control proponents and organizations, went on Charlie Rose and to give an interview where he talks about the problem of the growing human population, pollution and climate change, and how important it is that we do it quick within the next 15-20 years, not just in the USA, but all over the world. He expresses the entire underlying motivation for everything you see happening to the world right now between ESG scores, the WEF agenda, climate change control measures like geoengineering, anti-fertility toxins in the environment, forced vaccinations....everything is motivated by this immense sense of urgency that they need to obliterate 90%+ of the world population as quickly as possible to save the world from impending collapse where they too will suffer with the rest of us. It's not about the earth or humanity, it's about self preservation for them and greed in wanting the world to themselves. They consider us useless eaters. They morally justify reprehensible levels of evil and direct causation of human suffering by framing it in the context of the "greater good". If we don't do anything, we're all going to suffer and starve. They literally think that If they subtly poison everyone with vaccines and environmental toxins, destroy their fertility, and then work them into a hypnotic daze with entertainment and pharmaceutical drugs, we won't notice and will carry on as usual why they slowly destroy us. Unfortunately for them, a lot of us have noticed and we're not going to stay quiet about it. These are objective crimes against humanity and they all deserve to be brought to justice for it, with everything they have taken away from them like they're trying to do to us subversively. "A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." - Ted Turner

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 believes that the credit crisis is a mess because people borrowed too much money on their houses. They emphasize the importance of having equity in one's home and saving money. They suggest that it is possible to completely change the energy system within 15 or 20 years by mobilizing resources globally. This project would create jobs, generate fortunes, and provide numerous benefits. Speaker 1 warns that not taking action would lead to catastrophic consequences such as extreme heat, crop failure, and a breakdown of civilization. They compare not addressing global warming and nuclear weapons to suicide. Additionally, they mention the need to stabilize the population to reduce resource consumption. Despite the challenges, Speaker 1 remains optimistic and compares the situation to a baseball game where there is still a chance to win if the right actions are taken.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think of the credit crisis we're in now? Speaker 1: You know, I think it's a mess. Speaker 0: And why is it a mess? Speaker 1: Well, I because I think what happened is people were borrowing too much money on their houses. I I you know? Doing that. I don't my house is paid for. I mean, it has been. I mean, I I I don't believe you know, I think having equity in your home is a good thing. I I don't believe in spending every penny. Yeah. When I was making $80 a week after taxes were taken out of 20 when I was 21, I saved $10 a week and lived on $70. I mean, I've I've always saved. I I believe that was the thing. That's why my father taught me that too. Speaker 0: What's Possible. Tell me what's possible to do. Speaker 1: That in 15 or 20 years, we can completely redo it. If we we have to mobilize if this is how important it is and and how how how important that we do it quickly. We have to mobilize the same way we did when we entered World War 2 in 1941. We have to fully mobilize everything we have and put it into changing the energy system over. And not just here in the United States, but all over the world. It's gonna be the business business biggest business project in the history of the world. Fortunes, 1,000,000,000 of dollars are gonna be made. Hundreds of thousands of people were gonna be employed. We're gonna have clean air. We're gonna have so many benefits from it. It's not gonna cost us anything. Once we get going with it, it's not gonna cost us anything. Only the people that don't don't understand it think it's gonna not doing it will be catastrophic. Will have 8 degrees will be 8 degrees hotter in 10 not 10, but in 30 or 40 years. And, basically, none of the crops will grow. Most of people who have died, and the rest of us will be cannibals. Civilization will have broken down. What the few people left will be living in a in in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan, and and living conditions will be intolerable. The droughts will be so bad. There'll be no more corn growing. It it will not doing it is suicide. Just like dropping bombs on each other, nuclear weapons is suicide. So we've gotta stop doing the 2 suicidal things, which are hanging on to our nuclear weapons and Speaker 0: global And Speaker 1: and then after that, we've got to we've got to stabilized the population. When I was born, there was Speaker 0: too with the population? I mean Speaker 1: with too many people. That's what that's why we have global warming. We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff. But they If there were less people, they'd be using less stuff. If we don't get global warming and the nuclear weapons said that we don't have to worry about human rights. Well, all the humans will all be gone. Speaker 0: You know? Okay. Do you think we'll do it? I mean, are you optimistic in the end Speaker 1: I have Speaker 0: a country that the world will come to its senses? Speaker 1: Behalf of my grandchildren and the children all over the world, I absolutely think we gotta do it, but I have a way of explaining it very simply. I see a human situation, I like it to a baseball game. It's in the 7th inning, and we're down by 1 run. What so we're backs to are to the wall. Right. What we have to do, though, in the next innings. The game's not over. It's still winnable. But what we gotta do is hold them right where they are with our best pitcher. Right. And we've gotta get a couple runs on them. Speaker 0: Get them on base. Speaker 1: That's and then get him in. Get him in. And that ties it, and then another run to go ahead, and we win. That's where we are. We're we're in a tough situation, but we can play our way out of it if we do the right things. It's time for smart political leaders. No more dummies. We can't afford dumb leadership. Join us online at
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 5:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Gates discussed his mission to reduce mortality rates in developing countries at the WEF in 2008. He aimed to achieve this by vaccinating people, but some claim it's a cover to depopulate the third world. For more details, visit wideawakemedia.com. Get a discount on a T-shirt at wideawakeclothing.com with code TWITTER15. Limited to the first 20 customers.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking at the WEF in 2008, Bill Gates tells Klaus Schwab about his mission to depopulate the third world, by "reducing the mortality rates of common diseases". Translation: I will reduce the population of developing countries by sterilising everybody with my "vaccines", under the guise of reducing the mortality rate of common diseases. Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ql-Mtlx31e8… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 10 to 15 years, the speaker hopes to leave a legacy of significant achievements in their new work. They have set ambitious goals, particularly in addressing 20 diseases through their global health program. Their optimism stems from the possibility of making a dramatic impact on over half of these diseases within the given timeframe. By reducing mortality rates in developing countries, they anticipate a positive ripple effect, including a decrease in population growth. This, in turn, would make education and nutrition more accessible. With high expectations, the speaker aims to bring about substantial changes in global health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What would you like to see as your legacy in 10, 15 years? Speaker 1: Of the new work? Speaker 0: Of the new work. Yes. If you're a new function. Speaker 1: Well, I've set very ambitious goals I'm quite optimistic. If you look at, say, the 20 diseases that our global health program goes after, I'd hope that within 15 years, over half of those We could have had a very dramatic impact. You know, huge change in the, mortality rates in developing countries, Which then has this effect of reducing population growth. That's the this big benefit that then makes everything like Education and nutrition a lot easier. So I I have very high expectations
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

T-shirt available here: https://wideawake.clothing/collections/best-sellers-tshirts?filter.v.price.gte=&filter.v.price.lte=&sort_by=best-selling Use discount code 'TWITTER15' for 15% off (first 20 customers only)!

Best Sellers (T-Shirts) Some of our best selling t-shirts. Click here for our best selling hoodies. wideawake.clothing
Saved - October 1, 2023 at 2:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
UN Messenger of Peace Jane Goodall emphasizes the need to address global population growth. She suggests reducing the population to 450 million, a 95% decrease from today. Goodall believes many problems stem from overpopulation, which didn't exist 500 years ago. Source: [YouTube link]. For more content, visit [website]. #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs… Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
We should reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it contributes to many other problems. If the population size resembled that of 500 years ago, the challenges we discuss would not be as significant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Saved - October 19, 2023 at 4:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Renowned primatologist Jane Goodall, speaking at the World Economic Forum, suggests reducing the global population to 450 million, a drastic 95% decrease. Goodall believes that overpopulation is at the root of numerous global issues. She argues that addressing this problem is crucial for resolving other pressing challenges.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population. "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
We should reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it contributes to many other problems. If the population size resembled that of 500 years ago, many of the challenges we face today would not exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then, finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if There was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 8:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Renowned primatologist and UN "Messenger of Peace," Jane Goodall, suggests reducing the global population to 450 million, a drastic 95% decrease. Goodall emphasizes that population growth lies at the root of numerous global issues. She believes that reverting to the population size of 500 years ago would alleviate many of the challenges we face today.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking at the WEF, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production in intensive farms. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it is the root cause of many other problems. If our population size resembled that of 500 years ago, the challenges we face today would not be as significant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then, finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if There was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 1:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1974, Henry Kissinger's report, "The National Security Study Memorandum," raised concerns about population growth as a threat to those in power. This has led to speculation about a depopulation program. The report can be found at the provided link. The world's current state is attributed to the fear of losing control if the population grows uncontrollably.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨Do you know why it feels like there is a massive depopulation program going on right now? It’s written in, Henry Kissinger’s report from 1974, “The National Security Study Memorandum” : “Have you asked yourself why the world is an absolute dumpster fire right now? Because they decided that our population growth is a threat to them staying in power!! They were scared that they wouldn’t have the necessary tools to keep us ASLEEP, if the population got out of hand, so here we are!!”👇😳 Kissinger report -> https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pcaab500.pdf #PopulationControl #Agenda2030 #NWO #Illuminati

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explores the reasons behind the current state of the world and the abundance of misinformation despite the availability of information. They discuss mind control and its development in three specific categories, as outlined in the Henry Kissinger report from 1974. The government's concern about population growth led to the deployment of propaganda, such as MK Ultra and media indoctrination, to keep the population under control. The speaker presents a bell curve to illustrate the three categories: the truly asleep, the truly awake, and the majority in the middle. These categories are determined by IQ and emotional awareness, rather than social status or education. The speaker contemplates creating a series to explain how individuals are targeted by government propaganda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you asked yourself, why is the world an absolute dumpster fire right now? Like, is it social media? Is it, you know, TV? Why are we in such a mess today? And why are there so many stupid people, considering there's so much information out there, that people can read, that they can gather, and that they can gather their thoughts with? Well, I went down that rabbit hole and I found mind control and when it started, how it started and how we've been developing mind control to be specific to 3 categories that the entire world governments and 3 letter agencies have pretty much placed this in? If you're wondering where I got this from, there's a report called the Henry Kissinger report. Let me show you. It was basically written in 1974, and it is called the National Security Study Memorandum or the NSSM two hundred. It started because the government was scared that we would have a population, you know, overflow and that we would not have enough resources to keep the population asleep, and that they would turn on the government. So literally, you know, population growth became a national security for the government. And so they deployed a bunch and I mean a bunch of propaganda, whether it was MK Ultra, whether it was media, MSM propaganda, indoctrination in schools, universities, high schools, you name it? Every single aspect of our life started to change so that we would fit into 1 of the 3 categories that they have us categorized now. And I wanted to show you guys a bell curve, that I made that I got from the sources and pull the information from, but I couldn't really find, a bell curve, of it? So I drew one for you and I'll kind of explain what I've read in certain CIA papers? Let me show you. So out of a population in every country, so this is like an entire world population, you have truly asleep, truly awake? And then people in the middle. But let me tell you what they categorize us as. So you've got this group, which are the n p c's and these 10% on each side are people kind of take characteristics of both the sheeple and the sheeple and the awake or the NPC and the sheeple. So you've got the MPCs, which the government calls useful idiots. Then you've got the middle group, the largest population, which is called the sheep or the sheeple. Then you have 20% goats. Now, if you've ever raised goats, you know why the CIA calls the awakened goats. And those of you who think that there is a truly an awakening happening? It's not. It's just that this 10% is getting louder. The sheep will always be sheep. And what's interesting about each group is it has nothing to do with your social status, religion, political status, or how much money you make? What your education level is? It has to do with IQ and how emotionally awake you are. And it's super interesting. And I'm thinking of doing an entire series of basically explaining to people how they're being targeted by the government for propaganda.
U.S. Agency for International Development pdf.usaid.gov
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 10:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There was a plan for global population reduction, as revealed in the Died Suddenly series. Miscarriages, fetal deaths, and infertility are currently at record highs. The global elites' own documents, such as the United Nations' World Bank's Population Planning (1972) and the US National Security Council's 'The Kissinger Report' (1974), outline strategies to control birth rates. The Jaffe Memo (1969) by Planned Parenthood on behalf of John D. Rockefeller's Population Council is also significant. In 2021-2022, the experimental Covid Vaccine was marketed to pregnant women and babies as young as 6 months old. This is not a conspiracy; it's an extermination.

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

Did you know: There was an actual plan for global population reduction? One of the main themes of the Died Suddenly series is uncovering the orchestrated effort to depopulate the Earth. Right now, miscarriages, fetal deaths, and infertility are at the highest rates in history. Before you call us “crazy conspiracy theorists” have a look at the global elites’ own words: Images of the "instructions to destroy birth rates" documents that are covered: 1. Population Planning by United Nations’ World Bank (1972) 2. Implications of Worldwide Population Growth (‘The Kissinger Report’) by US National Security Council (includes CIA, military, etc.) (1974) 3. Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S (‘The Jaffe Memo’) by Planned Parenthood on behalf of John D. Rockefeller’s Population Council (1969) 4.) In 2021-2022: We watched as they marketed the experimental Covid Vaccine to pregnant women as “safe and effective” and recommended 3 mRNA shots for babies as young as 6 months old. It’s not a conspiracy- it’s an extermination.

Saved - December 6, 2023 at 3:54 PM

@CaelorumAngelus - Angelus caelorum 🧣

🇺🇸David Rockefeller, in 1994, during an UN Ambassadors’ Dinner, just said casually that the “world population should be decreased by the UN in a way that is “sensible to religion and moral consideration” in another words: you will be eliminated as painless as possible.👇🏻 https://t.co/yDPVpWzphW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Improved public health has led to a 60% decline in infant mortality and an increase in average life expectancy from 46 to 63 years. However, this has resulted in a rapid population growth, reaching almost 6 billion people and potentially exceeding 6 billion by 2020. The negative impact of this growth on our ecosystems is evident, with increased exploitation of energy and water resources and dangerous levels of pollution. To ensure a decent life on our planet, nations must work together to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation. The recent UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, but controversies arose due to divisive issues with moral implications. The United Nations should play a crucial role in stabilizing population and promoting economic development while considering religious and moral values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me illustrate. Improved public health has caused the world's infant mortality rate to decline by 60% over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world's average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 19 fifties to 63 years today. This is a development of which, as individuals, we can only applaud. However, the result of these positive measures is a world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6,000,000,000 people and could easily exceeds 6,000,000,000 by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. In particular, the rapid and growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern, and the toxic byproducts of widespread industrialization have increased as atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle to these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth, but the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population, and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral consideration.
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 10:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 2008 speech at the WEF, Bill Gates discussed his goal of reducing mortality rates in developing countries by addressing common diseases. However, some individuals claim that his vaccination efforts are a disguise for depopulation. For more information, refer to the provided sources: a YouTube video and the website for daily email updates.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking at the WEF in 2008, Bill Gates tells Klaus Schwab about his mission to depopulate the third world, by "reducing the mortality rates of common diseases". Translation: I will reduce the population of developing countries by sterilising everybody with my "vaccines", under the guise of reducing the mortality rate of common diseases. Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ql-Mtlx31e8 Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 10 to 15 years, I hope to leave a legacy of significant impact in my new role. My ambitious goal is to make a dramatic difference in at least half of the 20 diseases our global health program focuses on. By doing so, we can greatly reduce mortality rates in developing countries, leading to a decline in population growth. This, in turn, will make education and nutrition more accessible. I have high expectations for the positive changes we can achieve.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What would you like to see as your legacy in 10, 15 years? Of the new work? Of the new work. Yeah. Of your new function. Well, I've set very ambitious goals because I'm quite optimistic. If you look at, say, the 20 diseases that our global health program goes after, I'd hope that within 15 years, over half of those, We could have had a very dramatic impact. Huge change in the mortality rates in developing countries, Which then has this effect of reducing population growth. That's the this big benefit that then makes everything like Education and nutrition, a lot easier. So I have very high expectations
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 5:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ted Turner, in an interview 15 years ago, suggested that a population decline of 95% to 250-300 million people would be ideal to address overpopulation and climate change. However, the author questions the motives behind such proposals and criticizes the ideas put forth by Turner and others, suggesting an anti-human agenda.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." - Ted Turner This interview with Charlie Rose was from 15 years ago, and he said that the changes needed to be made to save humanity from impending collapse from overpopulation and climate change would need to come in the next 15-20 years and require global cooperation from every country. Well it's 15 years later and we're still here, listening to the same criminal eugenicists like Ted argue for reduced consumption of meat, more abortions, geoengineering and solar radiation management programs to block the sun, worsening fertility, and all the other anti-human agenda goals iterated by the WEF and their degenerate colleagues. The one question that always lingers in my mind is whether or not these people actually believe the words coming out of their mouth and that overpopulation is the problem, or if there is another subversive evil motivation behind the push beyond just saving the earth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the credit crisis and believes it is a mess because people borrowed too much money on their houses. They emphasize the importance of having equity in one's home and saving money. They also talk about the need to mobilize and change the energy system to combat global warming. They mention the potential benefits of this change, such as job creation and clean air. The speaker warns that not taking action will lead to catastrophic consequences like extreme heat, crop failure, and societal breakdown. They compare not addressing these issues to committing suicide. The speaker expresses optimism that the world can come to its senses and make the necessary changes for the sake of future generations. They use a baseball analogy to illustrate the need to hold the opposition and score runs to win the game. They call for smart political leaders and criticize ineffective leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you think of the credit crisis we're in now? Speaker 1: You know, I think it's a mess. Speaker 0: And why is it a mess? Speaker 1: Well, I because I think what happened is people were borrowing too much money on their houses. I I you know? Doing that. I don't my house is paid for. I mean, it has been. I mean, I I I don't believe you know, I think having equity in your home is a good thing. I I don't believe in spending every penny. Yeah. When I was making $80 a week after taxes were taken out of 20 when I was 21. I saved $10 a week and lived on $70. I mean, I've I've always saved. I I believe that was the thing. That was one of my father taught me that too. Speaker 0: What's possible? Tell me what's possible to do that Speaker 1: in 15 or 20 years, we could completely redo it. If we we have to mobilize if this is how important it is and and how how how important that we do it quickly. We have to mobilize the same way we did when we entered World War 2 in 1941. We have to fully mobilize everything we have and put it into changing the energy system over and not just here in the United States but all over the world. It's gonna be the business business biggest business project in the history of the world. Fortunes, 1,000,000,000 of dollars are gonna be made. Hundreds of thousands of people were gonna be employed. We're gonna have clean air. We're gonna have so many benefits from it. It's not gonna cost us anything. Like, once we get going with it, it's not gonna cost us anything. Only the people that don't don't understand it think it's gonna not doing it will be catastrophic. Will have 8 degrees will be 8 degrees hotter in 10 not 10, but in 30 or 40 years. And basically, none of the crops will grow, most of people who have died and the rest of us will be cannibals. Civilization will have broken down. What the few people left will be living in a in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan, and and living conditions will be intolerable. The droughts will be so bad. There'll be no more corn growing. It it will not doing it is suicide. Just like dropping bombs on each other, nuclear weapons is suicide. So we've gotta stop doing the 2 suicidal things, which are hanging on to our nuclear weapons And Speaker 0: global Speaker 1: and and then after that, we've got to we've got to stabilized the population. When I was born, there Speaker 0: was too What's wrong with the population? I mean Speaker 1: With too many people. That's what that's why we have global warming. We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff. But they If there were less people, they'd be using less stuff. If we don't get global warming and the nuclear weapons tried that we don't have to worry about human rights. Well, all the humans will all be gone. Speaker 0: You know? Okay. Do you think we'll do it? I mean, are you optimistic in the end Speaker 1: I have country Speaker 0: that the world will come to its senses? Speaker 1: Behalf of my grandchildren and the children all over the world, I absolutely think we gotta do it, but I have a way of explaining it very simply. I see a human situation I like into a baseball game. It's in the 7th inning, and we're down by 1 run. What so we're backs to are to the Speaker 0: wall. Right. Speaker 1: What we have to do though in the next 2 innings, the game's not over. It's still winnable. Speaker 0: But what we've got Speaker 1: to do is hold them right where they are with our best pitcher. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And we've got to get a couple runs on the base. Speaker 0: Get a man on the base. Speaker 1: And then get them in. Get them in. And that ties it, and then another run to go ahead, and we win. That's where we are. We're we're in a tough situation, but we can play our way out of it if we do the right things. It's time for smart political leaders. No more dummies. We can't afford dumb Speaker 0: leadership.
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 3:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jane Goodall, speaking at the WEF, suggests reducing the global population to 450 million, emphasizing that overpopulation is the root cause of many problems. She believes that the world would be better off with a population size similar to 500 years ago.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking at the WEF, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs Follow our backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle farming and growing feed for billions of animals in intensive farms. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it is at the root of many other problems. If the population size resembled that of 500 years ago, the challenges we discuss would not be as significant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
Saved - January 15, 2024 at 8:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Gates expressed his interest in population control to Klaus Schwab in 2008. He mentioned the potential reduction in population growth through disease control. This is ironic considering the World Economic Forum's focus on "Rebuilding Trust" at their meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The question arises: why does Gates feel entitled to manage the world population?

@_BlakeHabyan - Blake

Must Watch: Did You Know? In 2008, Bill Gates Told Klaus Schwab He Wanted To Spend The Next 15 Years Focusing On Population Control: With ‘Disease X’ coverage picking up traction, I felt this would be worth sharing. And of course there will be a shot for any manufactured ‘pandemic’. “…And a number of the other ones [diseases], we have things in the pipeline.” “Which then has this effect of reducing population growth. That’s the big benefit.”, Gates says. What’s ironic, is that the WEF’s meeting in Davos, Switzerland this week is focused around “Rebuilding Trust”. What makes him feel entitled to manage the world population?

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses their ambitious goals for the next 10 to 15 years in tackling various diseases. They believe that over half of the 20 diseases targeted by their global program can see a significant impact within this timeframe. While some diseases like AIDS may not see a dramatic improvement, others like malaria have potential solutions in the pipeline. The speaker emphasizes the importance of reducing mortality rates in developing countries, as it positively affects population growth, education, and nutrition. They use dashboards internally to track progress and share results transparently. The speaker also mentions the value of learning from any shortcomings and lessons that can be applied to other foundations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 10, 15 years. Of the new work? Of the new work. Yeah. It's your new function. Well, I've set very ambitious goals because I'm quite optimistic. If you look at say the 20 diseases, that our global whole program goes after. I don't fit within 15 years, over half of those, we could have had a very dramatic impact. Some of them will prove to be harder than others. For example, AIDS, we will made an improvement but not the dramatic improvement probably in that time frame. Malaria perhaps and a number of the other ones, we have things in the pipeline. So, you know, huge change in the, mortality rates in developing countries which then has this effect of reducing population growth. That's the this big benefit That then makes everything like education and nutrition a lot easier. So I have very high expectations there. I mean, I actually use these dashboards Internally at the foundation to make everything be quite numeric. You know, we're trying to be rigorous about that and even share those so that people can see, Oh, you fell short of, what you had in mind and then we get to explain if we have any lessons that might, be learnable from other foundations.
Saved - February 8, 2024 at 3:54 PM

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

1994 DAVID ROCKEFELLER DEPOPULATION SPEECH 2 years prior Agenda 21/2030 was implemented. What you're seeing take place around you has been going on for a very long time. None of it is new. You just barely found out. They hate you. You are the carbon they want to reduce https://t.co/ba3D3oKTpr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Improved public health has led to a decline in infant mortality and an increase in life expectancy. However, this has resulted in a rapid increase in the world population, causing negative impacts on ecosystems, energy and water supplies, and pollution levels. To address these challenges, nations must work together to tackle population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation. The recent UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, but faced controversies due to moral and divisive issues. The United Nations should play a crucial role in stabilizing population growth and promoting economic development while considering religious and moral values. Sustainable growth and global development were discussed at the Rio de Janeiro conference, emphasizing the need for private sector management, government regulation, and international coordination. International trade entities like the European Economic Community, NAFTA, APEC, and the World Trade Organization should contribute to sustainable development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health has caused the world's infant mortality rate to decline by 60% over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world's average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 19 fifties to 63 years today. This is a development which as individuals, we can only applaud. However, the result of these positive measures is a world population that has risen during the same short period of time, geometrically, to almost 6,000,000,000 people and could easily exceed 6,000,000,000 by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. In particular, the rapid growing rotation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern, and the toxic byproducts of widespread industrialization have increased as atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation. The prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is, of course, an in inevitable corollary of a growing population and is essential to improve standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment 2 years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development. It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations should certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process. But in addition, given the importance of unencumbered international trade in stimulating and facilitating economic growth, Some of the newer economic entities such as the European Economic Community, NAFTA, APEC, and most importantly, now known as the World Trade Organization are probably best suited to play a major role in ensuring sustainable development.
Saved - May 3, 2024 at 10:44 PM

@PieterChrist - Pieter Christiaens

@BGatesIsaPyscho Depopulation was always part of the plan https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve14p1/d121 https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pcaab500.pdf

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a call for a new world order with varying characteristics worldwide. Addressing population growth's negative impact on ecosystems is crucial, with the United Nations playing a key role in finding solutions. Controlling a million people was once easier than killing them, but now it's the opposite. Translation: A new world order is needed with different characteristics globally. The UN must help stabilize world population amidst environmental concerns. In the past, controlling people was simpler than killing them, but now it's the opposite.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a need for a new world order, but it has different characteristics in different parts of of the world. Now none of this may succeed this time, but this to me is sort of the outline by which someday in the next few years, a solution will emerge. Speaker 1: The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population. Speaker 2: In earlier times, it was easier to control a 1000000 people. Literally, it was easier to control a 1000000 people than physically to kill a 1000000 people. Today, it is infinitely easier to kill a 1000000 people than to control a 1000000 people.
Historical Documents - Office of the Historian history.state.gov 3.0 shell history.state.gov
U.S. Agency for International Development pdf.usaid.gov
Saved - August 23, 2024 at 8:33 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

David Rockefeller states that controlling the world population growth is the Elite's top agenda. https://t.co/847qik4ocf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns over energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, highlighting the difficulty of addressing divisive issues with moral dimensions. The United Nations should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth, essential for improving living standards, poses environmental threats without careful coordination. The Rio de Janeiro conference addressed sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but requires regulation by governments and international bodies. The United Nations should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern and the toxic byproducts of widespread industrialization have increased us atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is, of course, an in inevitable corollary of a growing population and is essential to improve standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment 2 years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development. It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, But regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations should certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.
Saved - August 27, 2024 at 4:12 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Luciferian billionaire David Rockefeller states that controlling the world population growth is the Elite's top agenda. He thinks him and his rich iIIuminati bIood cuIt buddies have the right to mass murder most of the population to have the planet to themselves. https://t.co/YBhJkLodg1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns about energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is essential to improve living standards, but unrestrained growth threatens the environment. The Rio de Janeiro conference focused on sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation by national governments and international bodies is needed. The UN should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern, and the toxic byproducts of widespread industrialization have increased us atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is, of course, an inevitable corollary of a growing population and is essential to improve standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment 2 years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development. It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector. But regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations should certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.
Saved - November 2, 2024 at 3:51 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

In 1991, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) published a controversial text calling for extreme global depopulation, calling for the elimination of 350,000 people each day, or 100 million people per year. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/33-years-ago-the-un-called-for-global-depopulation-of-100-million-people-annually/

33 Years Ago, the UN Called for Global Depopulation of 100 Million People Annually In 1991, UNESCO published a piece calling for hundreds of millions of people to be eliminated every year to fight climate change. thepeoplesvoice.tv
Saved - September 22, 2025 at 5:03 PM

@Chris490360 - Chris

https://t.co/MtW6liimUF

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Her own words, Sanger pushed for a society that limited birth to those she deemed fit to have children." "Well, I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically, delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just mocked when they're born." "I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble minded, the insane, and the syphilitic." "The most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the overfertility of the mentally and physically defective. Many point to a 1923 New York Times interview as proof of Sanger's racist motives in which she referred to people as weeds, saying" "It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society and the gradual suppression, elimination, and eventual extirpation of defective stocks, those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization." "Sanger once shared her vision"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Her own words, Sanger pushed for a society that limited birth to those she deemed fit to have children. Speaker 1: Well, I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically, delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just mocked when they're born. Speaker 0: In 1916, Sanger opened the country's first birth control clinic. As a member of the American Eugenics Society, she advocated improving the genetic composition of humans through controlled reproduction of different races and classes. She often wrote about the issue in the journal she founded called the birth control review. In 1919, writing Speaker 2: I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble minded, the insane, and the syphilitic. Speaker 0: The most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the overfertility of the mentally and physically defective. Many point to a 1923 New York Times interview as proof of Sanger's racist motives in which she referred to people as weeds, saying Speaker 2: It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society and the gradual suppression, elimination, and eventual extirpation of defective stocks, those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization. Speaker 3: She talked about the need for race betterment through through controlling these weeds. Basically, undesirable people. Speaker 0: In 1939, after opening another clinic in Harlem, the birth control activist launched the Negro Project, an initiative supported by black leaders such as civil rights activist WEB Dubois. Critics claim the program used the pretense of better health and family planning for poor blacks in the South as an attempt to limit the black race. Ludwig says some on the left grapple with Sanger's past and how to interpret her legacy. Speaker 3: They know when she writes about human weeds, they they know that it's that it's it's propulsive. They know it's disgusting. The left will never abandon Margaret Sanger because if they do, the she's the foundation of so many of their views. Speaker 0: Sanger once shared her vision Speaker 3: for

@TruckerLerone - Trucking With Lerone

@Chris490360 We knew back in the 70s some time after the seventies the Sanger plan started working and we started exterminating ourselves https://t.co/90zJIySOFC

Video Transcript AI Summary
All of a sudden, we were given this free free thing from the from the Society of America abortion. 78% of your free abortion clinics were placed in black and urban areas for the purpose of something free of charge from a racist society. As a to put it in words, the one pro abortionist, we don't need so many Negroes anymore. There's no more cotton to pick. These feelings about black people, this was one way of doing it as a social benefit, if you will. We're here to help you. Black women and let it be stated, black women never demonstrated, demanded, or even requested the right to an abortion. Been asking for the right to decent housing, the right to education, in fact, the right to health care. And all we've been given for your charge is the right to kill our unborn child.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of a sudden, we were given this free free thing from the from the Society of America abortion. 78% of your free abortion clinics were placed in black and urban areas for the purpose of something free of charge from a racist society. As a to put it in words, the one pro abortionist, we don't need so many Negroes anymore. There's no more cotton to pick. These feelings about black people, this was one way of doing it as a social benefit, if you will. We're here to help you. Black women and let it be stated, black women never demonstrated, demanded, or even requested the right to an abortion. Been asking for the right to decent housing, the right to education, in fact, the right to health care. And all we've been given for your charge is the right to kill our unborn child. We are still struggling for equally All of a sudden, we were given this free free thing from the
Saved - December 6, 2024 at 7:25 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

David Rockefeller talking about population control https://t.co/DmKbbUbXNJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Innovations improving human well-being are also creating significant challenges for our biosphere. While public health advancements have reduced infant mortality by 60% and increased life expectancy from 46 to 63 years, the global population has surged to nearly 6 billion, potentially reaching 8 billion by 2020. This rapid growth strains ecosystems, leading to overexploitation of resources and heightened pollution. The recent UN meeting in Cairo highlighted the urgent need to address population growth and its moral implications. The UN must facilitate a balance between stabilizing population and promoting economic development, while considering religious and moral factors. Sustainable growth, discussed at the Rio de Janeiro conference, requires both private sector efficiency and regulatory oversight from governments and international bodies, with the UN playing a crucial coordinating role.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ironically, however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems, which raise the specter of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to the biosphere we live in. And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health has caused the world's infant mortality rate to decline by 60% over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world's average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 19 fifties to 63 years today. This is a development which, as individuals, we can only applaud. However, the result of these positive measures is a world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6,000,000,000 people and could easily exceed 6,000,000,000 8,000,000,000 by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid and growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern, and the toxic byproducts of widespread industrialization have increased as atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is, of course, an inevitable corollary of a growing population and is essential to improve standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment 2 years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development. It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, But regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations should certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.
View Full Interactive Feed