reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - November 10, 2023 at 6:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Treasury auctions provide insights into the US financial system. Auctions involve various types of bonds, such as T-Bills, Notes, and Treasury Bonds. Individuals can place non-competitive bids, while institutions can place competitive bids. The auction process involves accepting non-competitive bids first, followed by a Dutch auction for the remaining amount. Metrics like Bid to Cover ratio and the high yield (stop price) indicate auction strength. A negative tail is favorable, while a failed auction is catastrophic. To prevent failure, the Fed can adjust SLR requirements or issue more short-term notes. Monitoring these auctions can offer clues about liquidity crises. Consider diversifying investments with hard monies like gold, silver, and Bitcoin.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Treasury auctions can give us clues to the health or problems of the entire US financial system. But what are those clues and how can you tell? Time for a Treasury 🧵👇

@jameslavish - James Lavish

👋 Auction Terminology First, this is about auctions by the US Treasury, selling bonds to finance US public debt They have various maturities and names Let's walk through them...

@jameslavish - James Lavish

• T-Bills are shorter than 1yr • Notes are shorter than 10yrs • Treasury Bonds are longer than 10yrs • and Treasury Inflation Protection Securities (TIPS) and Floating Rate Notes (FRNs) have various maturities

@jameslavish - James Lavish

*Some slang clarification* These can all be referred to as 'bonds', but traders never refer to anything above 10-years as a 'note'

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Treasury auctions occur regularly, and ~300 public auctions are held each year You can see here, the US Treasury has auctioned about $11.2T of bonds in 2022, so far... Big business. One that needs a lot of demand to keep this whole debt charade going.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Let’s clarify some definitions and rules to better understand what happens during an auction First, to participate directly, a bidder must have an established account Institutions use TAAPS (Treasury Automated Auction Processing System), individuals use a TreasuryDirect account

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Individuals can only place *non-competitive* bids, where they agree to accept whatever discount rate (yield) is set by the auction Institutions can place either non-competitive or *competitive* bids, where the bidder specifies an interest rate they are willing to accept.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Institutions can also trade in advance of an auction, and then settle with each other when the auction happens This is called the *when-issued* market and is pretty important to our discussion, so we’ll talk more about that in a bit Back to the auction itself...

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Once an auction begins, the Treasury first accepts all non-competitive bids and then auctions off the remainder of what it's looking to raise This is where competitive bidders are unsure whether they'll be filled at their price The process is called a *Dutch auction*

@jameslavish - James Lavish

For example: Say the Treasury wants to raise $100 million in 10-year Notes with a 4% coupon And say it receives $10 million of non-competitive bids The Treasury first accepts all these non-competitive bids and reduces the amount left for the Dutch auction to $90 million

@jameslavish - James Lavish

If it then receives the following competitive bids: • $25 million at 3.88% • $20 million at 3.90% • $30 million at 4.0% • $30 million at 4.05% • $25 million at 4.12% The bids with the lowest yield will be accepted first and then ascend up until the auction is filled.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Here, the Treasury needs to raise $100 million It first accepts $10 million of non-competitive bids, then all competitive bids up to 4.0% ($75 million), then $15 million of the 4.05% bids for $90 million total So, those who bid 4.05% would receive half of their orders filled.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

At auction's end, all bidders receive the same yield at the highest accepted bid In this case, $100 million of Treasuries were auctioned off at 4.05% On the face of it, this looks pretty bad, as the Treasury had to offer a higher yield to raise its target amount.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But how bad? And how can we tell? Good questions and the answer—per usual with Wall Street—lies in the expectations of pricing Let’s turn to the metrics of an auction next to find out how.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

🤨 The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly *Bid to Cover Ratio* One of the first things traders look at is the Bid to Cover ratio (often referred to as BTC) A simple statistic, this is just the total amount of bids received divided by the amount of bonds sold at an auction.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

In the case above, the total bids amounted to $140 million and the auction was for $100 million of Notes, so the BTC ratio would be 1.4x

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Like many stats, what we're often looking for is changes from prior periods Is the BTC ratio rising or falling? And how rapidly? If market liquidity is drying up, this would be a good first indicator. If it drops low enough, it’s a major red flag More on that in a minute.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Looking at the release of stats from last week’s US 10-year Note auction, we can see at the bottom, in the footnotes, that this auction had a 2.37 BTC ratio

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And looking at recent 10-year Treasury Note auctions, we see this is largely in line with the BTC we have been seeing, so no red flags here. (h/t Bloomberg Professional)

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The High Yield Another, usually much more important, metric to keep an eye on is the *stop price*, aka the *high yield* (see in press release above)—the actual yield received by bidders in the auction Two things we're looking for here...

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Remember how we said these securities trade in a when-issued market before and leading up to an auction? This creates what is called the *snap price* It sets the price expectations for an auction and is a critical piece of information for investors.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

First, was the auction overbid or underbid? In overbidding, the stop (high yield) is lower than the snap (when issued yield), and this is usually seen as a solid auction With underbidding, the stop is higher than the snap, indicating a weak auction.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

To put it simply, the snap (when-issued) tells us how the bond traded leading up the auction, and the stop (high yield) tells us how strong the auction was itself.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Auction Tail Another thing we’re looking for with the high yield, and a bond-fan favorite is called the *auction tail* The tail is the high yield minus the bond’s when-issued yield If there is no measurable tail, we say that the auction finished *on the screws*

@jameslavish - James Lavish

A negative tail means that the auction went better than expected, with higher-than-expected demand But positive tail tells us the auction did not go well because the yield realized in the auction exceeded market expectations, meaning weaker-than-expected demand.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Bottom line, the tail measures unanticipated Treasury demand shifts before auction The larger the tail, the worse the auction And if we ever see a tail in the 4, 5, or 6bp range, this would be considered disastrous in the bond world and mean things are breaking in US Treasuries

@jameslavish - James Lavish

OK, so now we know that a low BTC could be a red flag, an underbid auction can be cause for some concern, and a big tail is a big no-no But what exactly does it mean when a Treasury auction fails?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

😵 Total Fail Going back to the BTC Ratio, you may wonder what happens if Treasury holds an auction and receives fewer bids than face value of the securities they're selling This would mean the BTC falls below 1, and the Treasury failed to raise as much money as they expected.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

In the bond world, this is a failed auction and nothing short of catastrophic for the US Treasury So you may ask, with dwindling demand for USTs and active selling from Japan and China, is there a possibility of a failed auction soon? Why yes. Yes there is.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But there are a couple of fixes to prevent this from happening, at least yet See, US commercial banks are still flush with capital, as the Fed is receiving over $2.3T of reverse repo purchases daily This is extra cash that banks sell to the Fed overnight to be paid interest.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

If you haven’t read it yet, I wrote a whole 🧠Informationist Newsletter about the repo and reverse repo market You can find it here, for free👇 https://jameslavish.substack.com/p/repos-reverse-repos-and-the-mystery?r=8di03&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Repos, Reverse Repos, and the Mystery of the Overnight Lending Market Issue XI jameslavish.substack.com

@jameslavish - James Lavish

One fix is the Fed adjusting commercial bank SLR requirements to let them hold more bonds in lieu of cash or cash-like instruments Or, the Treasury could issue more short term notes and fewer bonds, allowing all this reverse repo money to be used in the auctions instead.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But once that $2.3T runs out, all bets are off, and QE infinity is on.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

💰USTs vs. Hard Money Even though risk assets and hard monies like gold, silver, and #Bitcoin have been taking it on the chin with Fed tightening policy and the contraction of the money supply, these are safe places for long term capital preservation, IMO.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

That said, I would not pile into any one of these hard monies all at once I also would not have 100% of my investments in any one of them But I would start buying some at these levels if I had none yet.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

To be clear, this is not for a trade for me. This is for a long term investment and preservation of capital in the likely event that we see a major pivot by the Fed back to quantitative easing at some point in the next 12 to 18 months.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

That, and the highly likely long-term event that the UST is fully unseated as the global reserve currency, and all hard monies benefit from it In the meantime, I’ll be watching these Treasury auctions closely for clues of a pending liquidity crisis And now you can, too.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

This thread is a summary of a recent issue of 💡The Informationist, the free newsletter that simplifies one financial concept for you weekly. You can join 18K+ readers here: http://jameslavish.com https://t.co/xZ8kb953tU

Saved - February 17, 2023 at 7:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent stock rally was fueled by liquidity injections from BOJ, PBOC, and TGA drawdowns. However, BOJ and TGA are tapped out, leaving PBOC as the wildcard. The debt ceiling in the US will be raised in August or September, leading to massive liquidity withdrawal and a liquidity cliff. The Fed may intervene, but the higher the markets go, the more violent the liquidity cliff will be. Be cautious and aware of what you're buying.

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

1/ The rally in stocks since October has been made possible by massive liquidity injections by the BOJ, PBOC, and TGA drawdowns. Let's look at these liquidity sources going forward: BOJ - This liquidity is tapped out. They can't buy more JGBs if they already own them all. https://t.co/umRym2VJWW

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

2/ TGA is the next easiest and totally calculable. ~$300B more of drawdowns (liquidity injections) due to debt ceiling then also tapped out. https://t.co/kporfv4Eou

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

3/ PBOC is the wildcard and likes to go against the grain. Could they continue this unprecedented pace of injection? Possibly. Are they likely to? I tend to agree with the mean reversionists: https://t.co/Odiehvjcwd

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

4/ What does this all mean for risk assets? Hard to say before a the debt ceiling gets raised in the US as the TGA drawdown is a massive injection and could offset a likely fall off in injections from BOJ and PBOC, but there is a bookend to this source: https://t.co/Uc3O6TNQ9k

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

5/ So come August or September (at the latest) the debt ceiling will get raised and the treasury will come out with massive issuance which is a massive liquidity withdrawal on top of the Feds $95B/m of QT. This is going to be a MAJOR problem for asset prices. #liquiditycliff

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

6/ This is a public service announcement to know what you are buying here. Yes, the tape looks amazing, and yes inflation has softened, but you are also buying an embedded assumption that the Fed cancels QT and comes in concurrent with the #liquiditycliff to monetize the debt.

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

7/ Otherwise we are going to get to test out what unprecedented liquidity drain does to asset prices. Will the FED and other central bankers eventually step in? ABSOLUTELY. Will they intervene before the crash in asset prices? You decide.

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

8/ But remember, price drives narratives. Especially if this market levitates higher, talking heads will make up all kinds of reasons to explain it when it's really just TGA liquidity. In this scenario, VIX drops lower, and the Fed has no cover to proactively pivot to QE.

@AllVentured - AllThingsVentured

9/ The higher markets go and the more participants are lulled into complacency and higher leverage by a falling VIX and the "new bull market" or even "new paradigm" narrative, the more violent the #liquiditycliff will be when it hits.

Saved - June 4, 2024 at 5:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The central banks are trapped in a black hole of their own design, facing a choice between saving their currencies or the system itself. The Federal Reserve has trapped the Treasury beyond the event horizon, and the financial gravity is becoming overwhelmingly strong. The United States' hegemonic influence of the Dollar has made it a superpower, but this could also become an existential risk. The US has weaponized the Dollar, but this power cannot last forever. The banking system is breaking, with an accelerating withdrawal of money throughout the system. Sanctions against Russia and the actions of the Bank of Japan are causing concerns. The US is edging towards default, and the drums of economic war are beating. The Treasury's debt issuance is going parabolic, and Kuroda's strategy in Japan is failing. Argentina is facing exponential inflation, and China is teetering on the brink. The Fed may be repeating the mistakes of the Bank of Amsterdam, and there is a movement to direct register the float of an entire company. The financial system is complex, and the SEC's incompetence is staggering. There are discussions on various topics such as Ayahuasca, the singularity in the monetary system, and the illusion of the financial system. The posts also touch on the recent events surrounding GameStop, the Chinese shadow banks, and the commercial property market. The Bank of Japan is stuck beyond the event horizon, and arguments for infinite liquidity are criticized. Gold's recent rally may signal the end of Western manipulation, and the quality of economic data is questioned. The Japanese Yen crisis and the potential currency crisis in Japan are also discussed.

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Peruvian Bull Meta Thread: A compilation of all my best work. The central banks are trapped in a black hole of their own design. They will soon be forced to choose which to save- their currencies or the system itself. The Dollar Endgame Thesis. 🧵🔥👇 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0yIATTy0J8

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Federal Reserve has trapped the Treasury beyond the event horizon. The Financial Gravity is now overwhelmingly strong 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Financial Gravity and the Fed's Dilemma: The Fed is trapped in a black hole of it's own design. There is no way out; only hard choices lie ahead. A Thread 👇👇👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The United States has become a superpower due to hegemonic influence of the Dollar. However, this can become an existential risk. 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Dollar as a World Reserve Currency has allowed the US to subjugate the entire world and become an Empire. However- our greatest weapon could turn into an existential risk. A Thread 🧵👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The US has weaponized the Dollar to be a secret Excalibur. To punish enemies far and wide. However, this power cannot last forever... 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Dollar is the world reserve currency. This grants immense geopolitical and economic hegemony to the United States. But, Treasury wants to keep their Excalibur a secret. A Thread: 🧵👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Federal Reserve has stolen the American Dream. Only the wealthy have benefited. 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Federal Reserve is responsible for far more of the evils in this world than you can possibly imagine. A thread: 🧵👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The banking system is breaking. 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Fed’s O/N Reverse Repo figure has been sitting at a record $2.2 Trillion, shattering all previous records. Time to follow a thread 🧵👇...

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

There's an accelerating withdrawal of money throughout the banking system. The Fed has created a Singularity which is ripping apart the banks. 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

A new financial crisis is brewing. There is an accelerating withdrawal of money throughout the entire system. The Dying Banks and the Singularity. A Thread 🧵👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The sanctions against Russia have wounded them. But could this be a bridge to far for the World Reserve Currency? 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

A lot has changed in just under a week. The timeline has accelerated. Let me explain 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Japanese have wandered far into the oceanic depths. Have they finally encountered a monster even the mighty BoJ cannot defeat? 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Japanese Yen surged this morning as the BOJ undertook a surprising change in policy and raised the cap on the 10yr bond to 0.50% They are battling a Godzilla. Can they win? A short thread 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Dissection of SVB's financials just prior to collapse. What if they're not an anomaly?👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Most people don't realize how crucial Silicon Valley Bank is. Billions of dollars in venture debt. Untold amounts of warrants and convertible notes in early-stage firms. If SVB fails, this could be the Lehman moment for the startup world.

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Republicans and Democrats are edging default. If the US actually failed to pay its Treasury bonds, the results would be disastrous 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

1/ The United States is one of the largest economies in the world and holds $31T of federal debt. However, if the country were to default on its obligations, the consequences would be far-reaching and severe. Time for a thread. 🧵👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The drums of economic war have begun to beat. The cracks are widening in the dollar based global monetary system ... 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Battle has begun for the future of the global monetary system. The fate of superpowers hangs in the balance. Bretton Woods III: Economic Warfare 🧵🔥👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Treasury is accelerating beyond the Event Horizon. The debt issuance is going parabolic. 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The United States is entering an exponential debt spiral. Welcome to the Monetary Event Horizon. A Thread ⚡️🧵👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Kuroda's strategy of Yield Curve Control is beginning to fail...👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Japanese are desperately trying to hold the line against the odds on their plan of Yield Curve Control. The Bank of Japan is TRAPPED. A THREAD👇🧵🔥

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Argentina is falling apart. Exponential inflation is here 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Argentina Enters the Endgame- Is the beleaguered South American nation in the early stages of hyperinflation? A THREAD 👇🧵🔥

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Chinese are teetering 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Warning signals are flashing red in the world’s largest real estate market. Is China on the brink of another 2008? a thread 🧵🔥👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Could the Fed be repeating the same mistakes as the Bank of Amsterdam before the collapse of the Guilder? 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Bank of Amsterdam's collapse signaled the end of the Guilder as a reserve currency. Could history be repeating itself? How the first Central Bank Died- A Thread. 🧵🔥👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Not finance related, but Ayahuasca is a powerful medicine for transformation 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

My Ayahuasca experience: Opening the Door to the Heart of Darkness. A thread about encountering the Jungian Shadow 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Deep in the monetary black hole, hides the Singularity. It could change everything 👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

THE SINGULARITY: There exists a hidden flaw in the monetary system, deep into the Black Hole... that could spell disaster for fiat currencies. A THREAD 👇⚡️ https://substackfwd.xyz/?url=https://dollarendgame.substack.com/p/the-singularity

The Singularity There exists a hidden flaw in the monetary system, deep into the Black Hole... that could spell disaster for the Dollar. substackfwd.xyz

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Fed has created a Financial Illusion greater than any other. What is left of Economic Reality? 👇 https://t.co/aH5g1QDL2Z

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Simulacrum: what if our financial markets are an illusion- and the abstraction has overtaken reality? The Fed has broken the Financial Matrix. A THREAD 🧵🔥👇 https://t.co/nSVDmtEHra

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The financial system is not some monolith upon which all transactions are made. It's far more complex (and interesting) 👇⚡️ https://t.co/39rFFnHmIW

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Layered Money The financial system doesn't work how you think it does. A THREAD 🧵👇⚡️

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The SEC's incompetence is staggering. Are they complicit in the financial crimes of the people they regulate? 👇 https://t.co/ds7xMKoa0l

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The SEC is a criminal organization. The true story of their epic failure to prosecute the largest fraud of all time: Bernie Madoff. A Thread 🧵⚡️👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

There is a movement to direct register the float of an entire company. Barely anyone in the financial world knows about this 👇 https://t.co/m3yOY5OMz0

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

PowerPoint on Gamestop and DRS- A THREAD 👇🧵⚡️ (1/31) https://t.co/s7dViDTEXw

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Did the Saudis make a secret deal selling oil for gold? ANOTHER revealed this controversial theory in 1997-could it still be in place?

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

ANOTHER: The controversial anon blogger in 1997 who revealed an astounding gold-for-oil deal hidden in the markets that shaped geopolitics for the last few decades. A THREAD 🧵⚡️👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

$GME almost broke the financial system, until they panicked and turned off the buy button. Dive in 👇🤯 https://t.co/9WKlENasN5

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

3 YEARS AGO TODAY, JAN 28th 2021: Price was going parabolic, and then Robinhood turned off the BUY BUTTON on $GME. What was revealed would shock the financial world- and the story still isn't over! A THREAD 🧵🔥👇 https://t.co/47rH6RoFVV

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

China's deflationary crisis has been spreading to equities, and authorities will utilize the inevitable liquidity injections to save the day. Are things going from bad to worse for the Asian behemoth? 👇⚡️ https://t.co/K5BV3vXg3K

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Crisis in Shanghai: Stock markets are getting hit hard in China, indicative of a vicious deleveraging cycle. CPI print was NEGATIVE again in December. What will they do to stem the bleeding? A THREAD 🧵👇⚡️ https://t.co/CwI10QJXgA

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Was $GME on the way to being cellar-boxed by malicious market makers before January 2021? Their playbook for bankrupting companies 👇 https://t.co/y3ug9i83kE

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

CELLAR BOXING: A post made in March 2004 laying out the entire naked shorting scam- how Market Makers profit from destroying companies. This is how they steal your wealth! $GME $AMC $MMTLP A THREAD 🧵🔥👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Chinese shadow banks are falling like dominoes. Are their real estate woes big enough to bring China down? 👇 https://t.co/0A4ToXZURK

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

China Crumbles: Xi's economic miracle is running into serious problems. Now the property market contagion is spreading to the shadow banking sector, and authorities are panicking on what to do. A THREAD: 🧵👇🔥 https://t.co/wNT8lKPnVC

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Regional banks are heavily exposed to the commercial property market. Is the downturn just beginning? 👇 https://t.co/bwU10M7CHd

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Shades of 2008? Warning signs are brewing in the commercial property market, and contagion is already beginning to spread to Europe. Are we seeing the CRE version of the Financial Crisis? A THREAD 🧵🔥👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Bank of Japan is stuck beyond the Event Horizon. The recent rate hike only confirms it 👇 https://t.co/3pjudSCKJV

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The BoJ is Trapped: The Bank of Japan just raised rates for the first time since 2007. Is Ueda sleepwalking into a currency crisis? A THREAD 🧵👇⚡️

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The arguments for infinite liquidity are nonsensical. Don't believe the dogma that unlimited naked shorting and excessive derivatives are positive outcomes for markets 👇 https://t.co/0u9KqOnEME

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

some tradfi bros like @ConwayYen disagree with a lot of what I say. since they are intelligent, their points are worth considering. but they are WRONG! Time for a thread on $GME, DRS, and the morality of markets. 🧵⚡️👇 https://t.co/LyuXTG4wO3

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Gold's recent rip could be a sign that decades of Western manipulation of bullion is finally coming to an end. But is this rally an omen of something far worse happening in global macro? ⚡️👇 https://t.co/p9JY4DnAKt

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Gold Endgame Begins: Gold is ripping to new all-time highs, and China could be behind the move. Is the Western gold market manipulation finally reaching its finale? A THREAD 🧵👇🔥 https://t.co/MpZ6a9ZysN

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Unemployment, Payrolls, and CPI all have problems. And the quality of the data seems to be getting worse 👇 https://t.co/DZthbyrl2E

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

The Potemkin Economy: More and more news reports come out concerning the booming economy- but underneath the surface, things are not as they seem. Can we even trust the veracity of the data anymore? A THREAD 👇⚡️🧵

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

A stellar Twitter Spaces on the Japanese Yen Crisis with informative rants from @acrossthespread and @DarioCpx Probably the best spaces we've ever done 👇👇 https://t.co/3wXhHNEcGv

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

https://t.co/j0JXD9pt0P

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

@acrossthespread @DarioCpx Japan is currently trying to ride both sides of the impossible trilemma, and their currency is blowing out. Another step in the Dollar Endgame 👇👇👇

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Tokyo Drifting Into A Currency Crisis The Bank of Japan intervened twice last week as JPY crossed the redline set in September 2022. What lies in store for the Japanese Yen? A THREAD 🧵👇🔥 https://t.co/qbNkGaqM0W

Saved - November 23, 2023 at 5:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The spread between $SPX front and second $ES futures is a good indicator of liquidity in the stock market. Since 2021, there has been a significant liquidity drain, likely due to the fading effect of fiscal stimulus and the Fed's decision to stop monetizing US debt. This liquidity drain is greater than what stocks are currently pricing. The indicator has accurately tracked liquidity injections during the banking crisis waves of March and May 2022. However, the rally in stocks since May 2022 has occurred during a massive liquidity drain, indicating a potential bubble. Other indicators, such as the divergence between Treasuries and #QQQ, also highlight the disconnect between stocks and the real economy. With the steepness of the 20MA of $SPX futures spread and the wide disconnect, a market crash may be imminent.

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

🚨Is the liquidity crisis about to hit and #stocks bids evaporate?🚨 @SpyMasterTrades post the other day inspired me to look deeper into the behaviour of the spread between $SPX front and second $ES futures. I got some interesting things out of it 👀 Charting the 20MA on the weekly and daily you can see that while the spread is a poor indicator to track $SPX long term trends (flat between 2008 and 2016 while the bull was running free), it it is instead a damn good indicator of the liquidity being drained or injected by central banks in #stocks ⚠️ While in the pre-covid era the beta between Fed Funds and this indicator was close to 1, we can clearly see a big spike after 2021 and Beta going well above 1. What caused that? 1- Fiscal stimulus boost effect fading 2-QT (FED stopping monetising US Debt) at the same time. The combination of the 2 factor is likely resulting in a liquidity drain from the market far greater than what #stocks are pricing. 😨 If we zoom in focusing on the past year, you can clearly see how the indicator tracked well the liquidity injected during the #BankingCrisis waves of March ( $SIVB) and May ( $FRC). But the indicator is telling us another thing, #stocks rally since May 2022 (when the indicator as well exactly bottomed) happened during a massive liquidity drain from the system. 🚨This has been a characteristic that anticipated every single market crash since 2000, a clear indicator of #FOMO and bubble exuberance. 🚨 While before it took far less liquidity drain to pop those bubbles, because less was injected prior to them forming, this time the drain is massive and well above what people are pricing off FF tightening effects (that have 12-18m lag) Summing all up, the run from May 2022 might have inflated the biggest bubble of all. This disconnect between #stocks and real economy is well portrayed by other indicators like the divergence between Treasuries and #QQQ (credit to @TaviCosta )or the divergence between the #DAX and German PMI. How far are we from the big bust? Considering how steep is the 20MA of $SPX futures spread and how wide is the disconnect with the real economy I fear we are pretty damn close 🥵

Saved - August 2, 2023 at 5:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Reserve is broke, relying on Treasury's cash reserves. The US Debt Clock now shows Treasury Notes instead of Federal Reserve Note. The Fed can't print more money, unlike the Treasury which holds taxpayers' cash. If taxes stop, the system will crash. Companies' owners are selling shares as the markets are artificially propped up. Yellen's failed attempt to get money from China meant denial for the Fed. Source: usdebtclock.org.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Economic. Financial. Fed reserve. Bankrupt Treasury. Octogon intel: The Federal Reserve is officially broke and out of money. #REPORT The US Debt Clock now shows US Treasury Notes instead of Federal Reserve Note. This means that the Fed is now broke. And using the real cash reserves from the Treasury. What's the difference? The feds print the money to be used. They can no longer print any more money. The Treasury is where all of the real cash money goes from the taxpayers. What happens if everyone stops paying taxes? The End. This system will ultimately crash soon. Which is why owners of companies have been dumping their shares. The markets are artificially propped up. To give the illusion that things are going well. A couple weeks back, remember I told you Yellen went to China bowing to all of them begging for money? They denied her. Which meant they denied the Fed. Source: https://usdebtclock.org/index.html

Saved - August 15, 2023 at 12:20 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

The US markets are quickly running out of liquidity to keep the market manipulation going. Expect a major collapse of US stocks and a steep fall as there are no more safety nets.

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 12:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Fed pays $723M daily to banks on reverse repos and interest on reserves. Previously profitable, it now supports a fragile system, creating programs to prevent collapse. This results in a $723M daily loss to hold it all together.

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

The Fed is paying $723 million PER DAY to commercial banks on reverse repos and interest on reserves. Back a few years ago, the Fed used to be profitable and sent it's profits to the US Treasury. But in recent years, in order to keep everything from collapsing, the Fed has been forced to create more and more programs to support the house of cards. This has resulted in this crazy system where the Fed is losing $723 million per day to hold it all together.

@RealEJAntoni - E.J. Antoni, Ph.D.

$723 million in daily interest curtesy of the Fed sterilizing $4.9 trillion...

Saved - October 2, 2023 at 4:01 PM

@PeterSchiff - Peter Schiff

As I've been warning, we are still early in the biggest #bond market crash in U.S. history. Every government, corporation, landlord, and family that has been relying on cheap debt to survive will die. When the #Fed tries to save their lives, it will kill them with #inflation.

Saved - October 15, 2023 at 3:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
US Treasury debt has increased significantly over the past four years, with a deficit of $1.7T as of 9/30. Many expect the deficit to narrow in 2024, but they underestimate the EM nature of the US. Yellen's strategy involves draining RRP instead of bank reserves to manage liquidity. The TGA has increased to $700b, while the Fed's balance sheet has decreased. The deficit would worsen in a recession, crowding out other asset funding. Yellen may accelerate TGA build-up to prepare for recession, elections, and the debt ceiling. Funding through bills shortens UST duration but increases fiscal stress.

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Thread on UST funding and RRP. Backdrop: US treasury debt outstanding has gone from $22.7T to $33.2T over the past four years (9/30/19 to 9/30/23), and 30.9T a year ago. So +$2.3T 1y and +$10T 4y. The -12m deficit is $1.7T per below, as of 9/30 (Treasury is on a Sept FY) 1/18 https://t.co/RRzl9qZNnB

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Many expect this deficit to narrow in 2024 and things to “slow down” or stabilize vis-a-vis Treasuries but they simply do not appreciate the EM nature of the US now. 2/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

I was surrounded by bears back in May and maybe the first to say that the “liquidity suck” fear (once the debt ceiling was resolved) was overblown because Yellen would call bill auctions and slow-walk the TGA refill by draining RRP instead of bank reserves… 3/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

You have liquidity pumping from TGA drawdown which may end with a debt deal and jar risk a bit (very near term) as Yellen calls a few auctions, but the reaction will be overdone because a bit of RRP drawdown takes care of those, and once corporate tax receipts hit mid June… 2/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

And elaborated here (and subsequently many times) 4/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Ah yes, ink is still drying on Biden’s signature and the histrionic gnashing of teeth about TGA liquidity suck begins. Remember my view - Yellen needs to bridge to 6/15, then slow walks it. RRP draw will help. We get to July without feeling this. 1/ https://t.co/Nuosrq1yj2

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

A review of where we stand vs May (right before debt ceiling resolved): -TGA is $700b vs $50b (+$650b) -Fed b/s is 7.9T vs 8.4T (-$500b) -RRP 1.15T vs 2.25T (-$1.1T) -Bank reserves ~flattish $3.3T 5/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Putting aside reserve identity and eurodollar discussions for a moment. What comes next is much simpler IMO… and once again non-consensus. The Fed must be cognizant of potential bank insolvencies that risk becoming liquidity events like First Republic and SVB. 6/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Treasury is also sensitive to this, and aware that should the US succumb to recession in 1H24, just ahead of an election, that they need to do what they can to have as little impact on the market as possible from the standpoint of *liquidity*. 7/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

The reality is the deficit would blow out in a recession at a time when other countries may not be relied upon to buy more bonds (USD FX/geopolitical reasons). This incremental issuance would crowd out other asset funding. 8/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Yes, UST supply matters. This isn’t 2008 when private assets were levered to the hilt and there wasn’t enough safety paper. There is too much ‘safety’ paper today vs where Fed induced liquidity still stands. 9/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

There are many who seem to think with TGA now back to $700bn that the liquidity drain hinges on Fed QT dripping lower at $60b/mo. The pre Covid days of $300-400bn TGA are history. Early Trump deficits were almost half what they are today… 10/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

…and Treasury paper outstanding was $10T lower. From a working capital perspective $600-700bn is the new floor. But with recession, the deficit explodes and you also need to raise the TGA in advance of the 1 Jan 2025 debt suspension date. Think about the timing here. 11/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

You can’t watch the Fed do another year of -$60b/mo and take RRP down by ~$720b to $400b at elections because asset mkts could panic by then. And on 1/1/25 you need to be fully loaded on TGA for another mudfight. You’re gonna want to go into ceiling negots with $1.5T+ TGA. 12/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Bank reserves are prob ok down to $2.5T (I have addressed this before here in aggregate). You would think there is ~$800bn room lower here on bank reserves, but not all banks are created equal, and many reserves are in banks that are potentially insolvent. 13/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

My view: banking system gets into “2019 repo trouble” around $2.5T (we can argue $100-200bln here or there among pals). So there is maybe $500bln of room on reserves (still tightening to be sure), and a few hundred yards of room in RRP before crowdouts of CP/paper gets felt. 2/ https://t.co/kcga9mI4TA

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

So why would RRP continue to collapse without bank reserves rising to offset? Because TGA needs to go to $1.5T+ by early 24 so Yellen can draw it in the months leading up to elections (give risk assets/sentiment a shot in the arm) and prepare for recessionary spending… 14/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

…all under the cover of filling her up well ahead of the debt ceiling as a “responsible thing to do.” The least disruptive way to prepare for accelerated disbursement in a recession and the debt ceiling is to *accelerate* the TGA build from here. 15/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Will Yellen actually do this? Who knows. But if you are going to tap the US liquidity pool to prepare for A) recession B) elections C) debt ceiling, you want to do it as soon as possible. 16/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

And the least disruptive way is to fund it out of sequestered reserves (RRP) — this leaves the banks out of it. I expect Yellen to double down on the June choice to fund via the bills in coming months. 17/

@PauloMacro - Paulo Macro

Of course, this only shortens UST duration and pays the highest funding cost, exacerbating the fiscal stress that will ultimately feed back into a higher required TGA in the future, but that’s the next guy’s problem, isn’t it… /Fin

Saved - October 18, 2023 at 5:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bond Vigilantes, originally coined by economist Ed Yardeni in the 80s, are investors who sell bonds to protest easing monetary and irresponsible fiscal policies. They aim to increase borrowing costs for governments and challenge the power of central banks. In recent years, concerns about fiscal policy, rising deficits, and inflation have led to a surge in long-term yields. The bond market is worried about the massive US deficits and the potential for the Treasury to flood the market with debt. As a result, Bond Vigilantes are driving rates higher, demanding higher returns, and potentially forcing a breaking point.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Bond Vigilantes. If you’ve been following the markets, you may have heard the term *Bond Vigilante* recently. And how they've caused all this bond market pain. But are Bond Vigilantes really to blame? And who are these so-called vigilantes, anyway? Time for a Debt 🧵👇

@jameslavish - James Lavish

😡 Who are the Bond Vigilantes? If the term Vigilante stirs up images of Batman or Dirty Harry, then you're on the right track Though in this story, Bond Vigilantes may be more like John Wick in V for Vendetta when it comes to sheer tenacity and type of justice they're seeking

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The term Bond Vigilante was originally coined by economist Ed Yardeni @yardeni in the 80s A time where inflation was raging and rates were rising But not quite enough, according to vigilantes who were logging their protest towards easing monetary and irresponsible fiscal policy

@jameslavish - James Lavish

These large investors were selling bonds, driving up yields and, in turn, increasing the cost of borrowing for governments Legend has it that they were doing this in retaliation of the growing power of the Federal Reserve.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The bond traders' actions were seen as a way to take the law into their own hands, since the Fed (the Sheriff here) was not adequately managing monetary policy itself.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

As you can see below, the 10yr UST yields drove higher and remained higher than the upper bound of the Fed Funds policy rate, eventually forcing the rates higher before they eased again. https://t.co/nsLVnBHK2P

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Flash forward to the 90's and vigilantes were back So relentless, Clinton’s strategist, James Carville said, "I used to think if there was reincarnation, I'd come back as president or pope ... But now I would want to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody.”

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And intimidate they did. Look at how the 10yr held above Fed Funds for years here, until the Fed finally (sort of) caught up in 1995: https://t.co/kLzVYXGQ1c

@jameslavish - James Lavish

By the way, guess who was appointed to join The Fed by President Clinton in 1994? Would you believe Janet Yellen? That's right. She's been in the sights of the vigilantes before.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

No wonder she recently said 'she doesn’t honestly think that’s the case today' But rather, 'the bond market is reacting to strong consumer spending and a stabilizing housing market' For real? We'll come back to that one.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But for now, Yardeni says the Bond Vigilantes are 'driving bond prices down and yields up, and sending a warning to Washington to rein in the deficit and inflation' After all, have you seen the bond market lately? Let's have a quick peek, shall we?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

😱 The Worst Bond Market in History Let's first point out that bond yields in the years from 2008 to 2020 were not normal In fact, there is nothing normal about ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy), at all.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Recently, analysts at BofA unearthed data to validate this point, showing how global long-term interest rates during 2008 to 2020 were the lowest in 5,000 years They even charted it out, and even though they left out a few thousand years, we will go with it: https://t.co/UasKQnHNv6

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Is it any wonder then, when the US printed trillions of dollars and inflation surged, the longer term interest rates followed higher with it? Looking at the aggregate bond market performance for the last 3 years: https://t.co/9pbxsVHp4Y

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And the TLT 20yr Bond ETF, down an eye-watering 50% from its highs in 2020. Pretty bad for the long duration segment of the Treasury market. https://t.co/FzIAzrZ10v

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And so, is it the worst performance drawdown for overall Treasuries in history? From the BofA Team again, going back to the early 1800s (ouch): https://t.co/x917VmMmDz

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But is it because rates were held artificially low for years, and now sticky inflation is causing expectations of the Fed raising rates higher? Or is it something else? Are Bond Vigilantes moving the markets? Are they, in fact, back, with Janet Yellen in their sights again?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

🤨 Inflation Concerns or Risk Premiums There are clues that the surge in yields of the 10yr and longer duration US Treasuries has much more to do with concerns about fiscal policy (Congress spending) than monetary policy (the Fed taming inflation). Let's see.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

First of all, there are plenty of conflicting signals coming from the economy right now, suggesting uncertainty with inflation and the eventuality of a recession These are lagging, mind you, so the direction of the data is more important than the absolutes right now.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Even so, after some key economic data was released last week, Fed Funds futures priced in the probability of another rate raise before the end of the year being just 24.6% Futures are also pricing in 3 rate cuts before the end of next year, taking rates back down under 5%. https://t.co/r9FkLQboc9

@jameslavish - James Lavish

So, why on earth would long term yields be rising in the market? One clue can be found in the MOVE Index, a bond volatility measure that suggests as uncertainty grows, US Treasury total returns have fallen recently. https://t.co/vBn8d8QIEp

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Which is likely due to something called *Term Premium* This measure shows how much yield (above short term rates) that investors are demanding to buy a bond Looking at the 10yr UST Term Premiums, we can see investors now want to be compensated for uncertainty in yields ahead: https://t.co/xfbPimoBjP

@jameslavish - James Lavish

So, even though Fed Funds futures are showing lower rates next year, the 10yr has been rising Why? Well, when you factor in this: https://t.co/w6KFgmc9UR

@jameslavish - James Lavish

...and this, where you see that federal deficits are now running over 7%, and growing: https://t.co/hjBY5BcTGp

@jameslavish - James Lavish

That's right US deficits are growing so rapidly, that we've just added another $2T of federal debt to the pile that now stands at over $33.5T total And over $500B was added in two weeks 😱 Good. God.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And this is not slowing down, evidenced by the US Treasury recently expanding the size of Treasury auctions, across the board: https://t.co/wxxbhWJTaY

@jameslavish - James Lavish

To be clear, the bond market isn't worried about US defaulting on its debt No. The sincere concern is that the US is running such massive deficits that the Treasury will have no choice but to dump a mountain of debt onto the market Trillions and trillions and *trillions* of it.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

This means that not only will the Treasury soak up every available USD for investment, but investors will demand a higher return for the purchases. Why?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Because they know the US must keep the charade going by either printing more money and monetizing debt (QE) or allowing inflation to run hot to create larger nominal GDP and hence higher tax revenue Either way, it means higher inflation and lower REAL return on those bonds.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Enter the Bond Vigilantes. You can see here how the buying base for USTs has shifted to the players in the market who are actually price sensitive (i.e., Pension, Mutual, and Money Market Funds): https://t.co/fcBZmeDawo

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Also, the Fed is now competing with the Treasury by trying to peel some of those $8T of USTs off their own balance sheet from massive QE purchases in 2020 and 2021...

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And foreign demand is dropping with two of our largest buyers, China and Japan, now net sellers as they sell USTs to shore up their own balance sheets Commercial banks have massive losses from USTs on *their* balance sheets, (a la Silicon Valley Bank) They aren't buying more.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Bottom line, it appears the Bond Vigilantes are back with a vengeance They may end up doing The Fed's job for them, driving rates higher and higher, until something in fact, breaks Or Congress somehow gets their act together and cuts back on ridiculous spending.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

I have my money on something breaking first Because, as Yardeni said just last week: the Bond Vigilantes are "not only saddled up, but they're on the move" And, once again, they mean business.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

This thread is a summary of a recent issue of 💡The Informationist, the free newsletter that simplifies one financial concept for you weekly. You can join 18K+ readers here: http://jameslavish.com https://t.co/jSRb0Y8fnu

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 1:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Reverse Repo Facility is a crucial part of the overnight lending market. It involves repurchase agreements between banks and the Fed. When banks need cash, they sell US Treasuries to the Fed and buy them back later at a slightly higher price. This is called a repo. On the other hand, in a reverse repo, banks buy US Treasuries from the Fed to generate a rate of return on excess cash. The NY Fed sets the Reverse Repo Rate, which is currently 5.30%. Recently, the focus has shifted to the Reverse Repo market as banks are swimming in excess cash. This is due to the massive injection of liquidity through QE. However, the Treasury has been draining the Reverse Repo Facility by auctioning short-term T-Bills. As the facility approaches zero, the Treasury may need to explore other options, such as adjusting capital requirements or modifying collateral rules, to fund its increasing debt. The future of the Reverse Repo Facility remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the government's spending will continue, leading to the need for more money printing.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Reverse Repo Facility Lots of talk about how it's dwindling fast and may soon be empty...but does it really matter? Yes, it matters. A whole lot more than you may think. Time for a Fed 🧵👇

@jameslavish - James Lavish

🎯 Repo vs Reverse Repo What are they, and what're their differences? Put simply, they are two overnight lending markets run by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) All purchases and sales (open market operations) are made by the NY Fed Open Market Trading Desk (the Desk)

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Repo A repo is basically a repurchase agreement between two parties The term can be used in many different types of transactions, but we most often hear it used to describe overnight transactions of US Treasuries.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

See, when a bank needs cash to cover short term obligations, it can sell USTs to the Fed (in return for cash) agreeing to buy them back just 24 to 48 hours later at a slightly higher price This is called a Repo or 'Repurchase Agreement'.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The difference between the amount of cash the bank receives and the amount it pays back is calculated to be the 'discount rate', or the cost of ‘overnight’ borrowing from the Fed It looks like this: https://t.co/mMSl0WtUDG

@jameslavish - James Lavish

So, if there is a lack of liquidity in the system, banks may be looking to loan their US Treasuries to the Fed for cash to cover short-term needs Got it.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But what if there's too much cash in the system, and banks who are looking to generate interest on that cash aren't able to buy any more USTs, because they're at their internal and/or Fed-mandated limits? Well, that's where the *Reverse* Repurchase Agreement comes into play.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Reverse Repo Much like the repo transaction, where a bank sells US Treasuries to the Fed, in a *Reverse Repo*, the bank buys US Treasuries from the Fed But why would they do this?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Simple. When a bank has too much cash on its balance sheet, it can utilize the reverse repo to generate a rate of return on that cash in the overnight market In essence, the bank *parks* its cash at the Fed.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And so, like a mirror image of the repo, the Reverse Repo looks like this: https://t.co/NJKm720KfC

@jameslavish - James Lavish

An important key here is that the NY Fed sets the Reverse Repo Rate And as you can see here, the rate is currently 5.30% Remember this number, we will come back to it in a bit. https://t.co/PodJOt5U1H

@jameslavish - James Lavish

🔍 Filling the RRF Another thing you may have noticed recently is that we are hearing precisely nothing about the Repo market lately Why? Because virtually nobody is using it. https://t.co/YxRodee6Zw

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The reason for this is that the major banks are not strapped for cash, but rather swimming in it And so, all the focus and action has been in the Reverse Repo markets But how did this happen? Why are these banks swimming in, stuffed to the gills with, all this cash?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

You got it QE (almost infinity) in 2020 and 2021 See, when the Treasury and the Fed teamed up to 'inject liquidity' into the markets, they hit the banks with something of a cash tidal wave.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Turns out that when you print and purchase over $5.8T of securities from banks and put those securities on your own balance sheet in return for floods of cash... https://t.co/TEEfxWcaFr

@jameslavish - James Lavish

...you wind up creating massive excess cash balances at the banks, who then in turn, wind up eventually parking it back at The Fed in the Reverse Repo Facility. Look at what also happened between 2021 and the end of 2022: https://t.co/oNnn2PaQaQ

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Fed then pays the bank the current Fed Fund influenced Reverse Repo Rate as a yield on those balances Which, as you can see the Reverse Repo Operations Schedule above, is 5.30% (annualized) yield this week What a deal!

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But that $2.4T of Reverse Repo Facility balances has been falling recently and is now down quite a bit. But why? Where's all the excess cash going?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

✍️ Draining the RRF Again, unless you've been completely ignoring all news and media (good for you, seriously), then you've likely also noticed that there's been quite a bit of talk about the expanding US deficit and ballooning US debt this year.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

This phenomenon is called the Debt Spiral, and it's apparent mathematically that we have already entered one If you want to know more about that you can read all about it in a thread posted over a year ago, right here: https://x.com/jameslavish/status/1562078782453792768?s=20

@jameslavish - James Lavish

If you’ve never heard of a *debt spiral*, it’s time you did, and ask the question, "is the US already in one?" Let’s dig in and answer that. A debt 🧵👇

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Bottom line, the US is spending too much compared to the amount of productivity and taxes it is (read: its citizens and companies are) generating, and this excess spending is causing the need for the Treasury to borrow more and more... ...and more.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

So, they've been covering the deficit with auction after auction of bonds, just papering over the spending problem. https://t.co/RRfIHnTzdu

@jameslavish - James Lavish

But because interest rates are now significantly higher than when the Treasury started to flood the market with USTs, they've been leaning hard on the short end of the yield curve Notice the steep pickup in T-Bill issuance this year, surpassing even the shock of March 2020: https://t.co/zqaVwR99T2

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Treasury has pivoted to short-term T-Bill auctions for two reasons 1) To avoid locking into long-term high interest rates which would exacerbate the deficit and interest expense 2) They can tease capital back out of the Reverse Repo with yields slightly higher than 5.3%

@jameslavish - James Lavish

So, how are they doing with that plan? It seems swimmingly well In fact, the Treasury has drained ~$1.5T from the Reverse Repo Facility in just the last few months. https://t.co/ncPorAlOB5

@jameslavish - James Lavish

The Treasury's Q4 refunding plan reiterated they would continue this, and they're OK with staying well above a normal ratio of ~20% T-Bills and 80% Bonds In fact, the Treasury has effectively inverted this ratio, auctioning ~65% T-bills and ~35% Bonds this past year.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Using the Treasury estimated $1.5T+ of upcoming auctions between now and the end of the first quarter of 2024, it seems the Reverse Repo will soon be drained But if the Treasury keeps the same pace of auctions as the last couple of months, the RRF could be drained by January.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Either way, it appears that is the direction the Treasury is headed, and the RRF will, in fact, soon be back to zero Then, the only backstop is investors continuing to move cash into money markets because of attractive yields But when rates start to fall, then what?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

🧠 Where will the Treasury Turn? With the gov't running $2T annual federal deficits, the Treasury simply cannot stop issuing debt And this is *before we hit a recession* and the deficits *increase*.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Where will the Treasury turn for even *more* capital? Can they just issue longer term bonds instead?

@jameslavish - James Lavish

If you've been following me, you know that the last Treasury 30-yr bond auction was abysmal, signaling a steep drop-off in demand and confidence in long-term US Treasuries If you've not yet read about that, you can find a thread on it right here: https://x.com/jameslavish/status/1724541356113264691?s=20

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Abysmal. Disastrous. Catastrophic. All terms you may have heard describing the most recent US Treasury Bond auction. But how bad was it? Did it really almost fail? Time for a Treasury 🧵👇

@jameslavish - James Lavish

TL;DR: international and institutional demand fell off a cliff this past auction, and the Treasury may have difficulty growing the sizes of auctions necessary to meet demand when they need to move further out on the yield curve.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

When the Reverse Repo Facility is drained and the Treasury can no longer use that excess capital to fund additional debt, they may have to turn to more drastic measures, such as...

@jameslavish - James Lavish

• Adjusting Capital Requirements The Fed and regulatory agencies could lower the capital requirements for banks This means banks would need to hold less capital against certain assets, freeing up more funds for investment, including in longer-term Treasury bonds.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

• Modifying Collateral Rules The Fed could alter the rules regarding what types of collateral can be used in various Fed lending facilities, which might encourage more purchases of Treasury bonds.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

• Tweaking Regs Regulatory changes could be made that *require* financial institutions to hold more long-term Treasuries I.e., changes could be made to the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) requirements to encourage or require holding longer-term government securities.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Additional options may include some sort of stealth injection of capital into banks or the markets in order to ensure sufficient liquidity for debt auctions Think: four letter acronyms like the BTFP or similar programs they can and I expect they will implement.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Then, of course, we have the upcoming 2024 Treasury Regular Buyback Program What this is and how it will be used remains to be seen, but this could act as a quasi-yield curve control or *stealth QE program* We will see...

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Any way you cut it, the RRF lifeline is dwindling and soon ending Your guess as to where the Treasury turns and what exactly they end up doing is as good as mine, but I watching Treasury auctions and the debt markets carefully.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

Because one thing we can be absolutely sure of... The government is not going to stop or even slow down spending any time soon, and they will eventually have little choice but to print more money.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

And then? The Reverse Repo Facility will just be filled right back up again. What a deal, indeed.

@jameslavish - James Lavish

This thread is a summary of a recent issue of 💡The Informationist, the free newsletter that simplifies one financial concept for you weekly. You can join 25K readers here: http://jameslavish.com https://t.co/Ad4cmlVj29

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 9:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Reverse repo operations fell over $100 billion, causing a liquidity crisis. Banks have less capital to meet margin requirements, potentially leading to a fire sale of assets. The Fed's unwinding of MBS is slow, while a housing correction is underway. Banks hold a significant amount of MBS, and Goldman and JPMorgan have uninsured deposits. The monetary system's Ponzi scheme will impact the global economy. Heavily shorted stocks and precious metals tend to perform well in such times. UBS lacks liquidity and can't participate in the reverse repo program due to legacy costs from the Archegos fallout. The RRP drain of funds to the bond sector poses a problem as long-term bonds are illiquid.

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

BREAKING 🚨 REVERSE REPO OPERATIONS TODAY FELL OVER $100 BILLION‼️ MONEY MARKET (MUTUAL) FUNDS AND BANKS USE THE REPO/REVERSE REPO TO STASH CASH IN HIGHLY LIQUID US TREASURY NOTES. THIS ALLOWS THEM TO RECEIVE THE FED FUNDS RATE + 0.05% APR IN OVERNIGHT LOANS IN EXCHANGE FOR T BILLS AND DO THE OPPOSITE THE FOLLOWING DAY. THE FED HAS IMPLEMENTED NEW INCREASED INITIAL MARGIN REQUIREMENTS THAT HAVE RAISED THE MINIMUM CAPITAL LEVEL REQ'D FOR AMERICA'S TOP FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. AS LIQUIDITY IS SUCKED OUT OF THE SYSTEM BY THE #RRP, THIS LEAVES BANKS WITH LESS CAPITAL WITH WHICH TO MEET #MARGIN COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS. THIS HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CAUSE A FIRE SALE OF ASSETS SHOULD THE BANKS BE MARGIN CALLED BY THE DTC, OCC, NSCC, etc, AND/OR THE HEDGE FUNDS & FAMILY OFFICES TO WHICH SAID BANKS LEND SHARES & CASH TO BE MARGIN CALLED BY THEIR PRIME BROKER (BANK). WE ARE SEEING THE BEGINNINGS OF A LIQUIDITY CRISIS MEANWHILE THE FED HAS ONLY UNWOUND 10% OF THEIR #MBS VALUED OVER $2.7 TRILLION. A HOUSING CORRECTION HAS BEGUN AS NEW HOME SALE PRICES ARE DOWN 20% YoY, EXISTING HOME SALE NUMBERS HAVE COLLAPSED TO 2009 LEVELS, AND EXISTING HOME SUPPLY HAS JUST BEGUN TO INCREASE. BANKS HAVE A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL MBS AND A VALUE AT RISK FOR THE TOP 4 U.S. BANKS OF OVER $719 BILLION. MEANWHILE GOLDMAN HAS 45% OF THEIR DEPOSITS UNINSURED BY THE FDIC, AND JPMORGAN 55% UNINSURED. THEYRE ALL BETTING ON A FEDERALLY FUNDED BAILOUT WITH YOUR MONEY IN THE FACE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF THE WORST RECESSION AND STAGFLATION THIS COUNTRY HAS EVER SEEN DUE TO THE PONZI SCHEME THAT IS EXACERBATED BY THE RECORD LEVEL OF C19 MONEY PRINTING BAILOUTS GIVEN TO INSTITUTIONS IN 2020 IN RESPONSE TO THE COLLAPSE OF THE #RRP ON SEPT 19, 2019 WHEN THE FED HAD TO TAKE OVER THE REPO OPERATIONS TO PREVENT A FULL BLOWN #STOCKMARKET COLLAPSE AT THAT TIME‼️ THESE ARE THE DEATH THROES OF A MONETARY SYSTEM PONZI SCHEME THAT WILL HAVE AN INEVITABLE IMPACT ON THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND ALL OF OUR FINANCES, EVEN IF INVISIBLE AT FIRST GLANCE MUCH LIKE THE INFLATION OF THE LAST 2 YEARS. SILVER LINING? HEAVILY SHORTED STOCKS, FUNDS, AND PRECIOUS METALS TEND TO 🚀 IN TIMES LIKE THIS. I.E. #VW, #GOLD, #SILVER, #VIX ETC IN OCT 2008 & ONWARDS JUST 13 DAYS AFTER THE WORST DAYS IN #SP500 HISTORY SAW A 13% LOSS ON A SINGLE DAY. #AMC #GAMESTOP #PSLV #SILVER #GOLD #VIX #UVXY #MINERS #HYMC #SLV #SPROTT #PRECIOUSMETALS

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

BREAKING 🚨 REVERSE REPO PROGRAM FELL BY $65 BILLION TODAY‼️ WHY? BECAUSE UBS LACKS LIQUIDITY THEREFOR DOESNT HAVE THE FUNDS TO USE THE RRP‼️ THE RRP SIGNALS A COLLAPSE IN LIQUIDITY‼️ @UBS HAS INCREDIBLY MASSIVE LEGACY COSTS THAT REMAIN FROM ARCHEGOS FALLOUT IN WHICH CREDIT SUISSE WAS LEFT HOLDING A GIANT BAG OF ODOROUS EXCREMENT THAT NOW BELONGS TO #UBS‼️ THE SWAPS AND SHORTS BY ARCHEGOS AGAINST #GAMESTOP AND #AMC HAVE NOW BECOME THE ADOPTED CHILD OF #UBS‼️ 🤣🤣🤣 THE TOTAL NUMBER OF COUNTERPARTIES ALSO FELL FROM A HIGH OF ~110 TO UNDER 94 USING THE RRP‼️ #WGBSFR

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

To follow up, the RRP drain of funds moving to the bond sector poses the same problem. Long term bonds aren't highly liquid during times of duress and therefor aren't quickly convertible to cash. That's why this is a problem even tho MMF and Banks are moving some of the cash to the long term 2Y bonds for example, the risk of illiquidity remains.

Saved - December 3, 2023 at 11:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Reserve and the banking system face a potential credit implosion due to changes in collateral requirements. US Treasury bonds no longer serve as global reserve assets, impacting the value of America's debt. The Fed's reverse repo, which values their collateral (mortgage-backed securities), is being drained by G-SIB banks. Once the reverse repo is depleted, the Fed's collateral becomes valueless. The unwinding of the US Treasury bond carry trade further exacerbates the situation. The Fed's inability to go into quantitative easing (QE) adds to the risk. ISO 20022 and Basel III regulations also play a role. The article suggests that the Fed's future is uncertain and highlights the need for the US to find alternative solutions in trade and economic policies.

@MikeCristo8 - MikeCristo8

🚨🚨🚨WOULD I LIE TO YOU ABOUT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BLOWING UP NEXT WEEK ??🚨🚨🚨 🚨I want to clarify the plumbing of the Fed & G-SIB’s to show impending credit implosion of both the Fed and the banking system🚨 🚨🚨The reason why the banks will collapse next week, is because the U.S. Treasury bond no longer meets the collateral requirements for tier 1 capital. 🚨🚨U.S. Treasury bonds no longer serve as the (global reserve asset) collateral that trades oil to value America’s debt. The Federal Reserve’s ($2.3t) reverse repo is credit (the Feds liability) that values the Feds collateral (their asset), which are mortgage-backed securities (once valued at $2.3t). FOOTNOTE: the Feds asset, MBS was $2.3t against the Fed’s liability ($2.3t reverse repo which is the credit the Fed themselves created). The Reverse Repo is Now $768bn. The Feds reverse repo are the G-SIB’s bank reserves or assets which are held at the Fed via the reverse repo. The G-SIB’s are draining their bank reserves from the Fed’s reverse repo which is the Fed’s liability (the $2.3t original credit created) for lifting the mortgage-backed securities from the G-SIB’s balance sheet. Once the G-SIB’s drain the Fed’s reverse repo (their bank reserves held at the Fed), There is no credit (liability side) with which to value the Fed’s collateral which are the mortgage-backed securities. Credit values the asset Once the credit (G-SIB’s bank reserves) is drained, What I’m saying is the Fed’s collateral, the mortgage-backed securities will become valueless because the Fed’s credit account (the liability side) has been drained. The U.S. Treasury bond (dollar trade) is being unwound. The G-SIB’s liabilities are the deposits that funded U.S. Treasury bonds through the corporate bond market. Under Basel III regulations, the U.S. Treasury bond is no longer considered tier 1 collateral (bank assets) to their balance sheet that hedges against a banks liabilities. The U.S. Treasury bond carry trade is being unwound which is draining the reverse repo. Once the reverse repo is drained, remember they are bank reserves (a bank asset), Once the reverse repo is drained, the G-SIB banks have no more assets, and the Federal Reserve no longer has a liability side (which is the credit) that values the mortgage-backed securities on the Federal Reserves balance sheet which is the collateral. If the G-SIB banks have no more assets (the reverse repo i.e. bank reserves), to hedge against their collapsing liabilities (U.S. Treasury bond unwind), the G-SIB banks blow up. The Fed is forbidden from going into QE, so there will be no more credit (Fed liability/revers repo) with which to value the collateral (mortgage-backed securities) on the Feds balance sheet. Why would the Federal Reserve allow the G-SIB’s to drain from the reverse repo (which are really bank reserves/assets) against the collateral (MBS, held at the Fed) if the Fed can just go into QE. Part II below (very important) ALSO see my 2:37PM tweet from yesterday. @BossBlunts1 finally figured out some. Banks will have ZERO liquidity by next Friday as the reverse repo will be sucked dry. @BillAckman @sama @JoeBiden @JeffBezos @satyanadella @RobertDowneyJr @gdb @joerogan @FT @WSJ @Forbes @elerianm @BarackObama @unusual_whales @MattWallace888 @KimDotcom @marcorubio @HawleyMO @tedcruz @marklevinshow @gurgavin @MarioNawfal @AOC @MarioNawfal @spectatorindex @TheInsiderPaper @GoldTelegraph_ @thesiriusreport @Prolotario1 @stillgray @disclosetv @htsfhickey @JackStr42679640 @KobeissiLetter @DougAMacgregor @ParikPatelCFA @KanekoaTheGreat @TuckerCarlson @JackFarley96 @TaraBull808 @AltcoinGordon @alx @davidbelle_ @fejau_inc @jsolomonReports @PeterSchiff @PrestonPysh @davidicke @balajis

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

BANK LIQUIDITY IS BEING MASSIVELY IMPACTED DUE TO THE FED'S CONCURRENT QT AND QE. THEY CANT PRINT MONEY INTO AND SUCK MONEY OUT OF THE MONETARY SYSTEM AT THE SAME TIME AND EXPECT ANYTHING MORE THAN AN ARTIFICIAL PUMP OF GDP WITH LONG TERM STICKY INFLATION AND FURTHER DEVALUATION OF THE USD TO END THEIR PONZI SCHEME THAT IS THE FIAT. LINK TO VIDEO EXPOUNDING ON THE RRP COLLAPSE, HOUSING, BANK LIABILITIES, AND POOR STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK: 🚨🔥https://youtu.be/gCikvMLLsbQ?si=cPO20qHT7-DfqVov 🔥🚨

@MikeCristo8 - MikeCristo8

(Part II) ANSWER; ISO 20022 prevents the Fed from ever doing QE again. The G7 Central Banks Are going down. Why isn’t the macro establishment NOT talking about this very important detail? It really may be over for the Fed next week! Because liability (credit) the G-SIB’s issued to value the U.S. Treasury bond asset(s) is being undone due to Basel III and ISO 20022. What do you think the MBS is backed by? The “liability” credit (the reverse repo) the Fed created. When the reverse repo is drained, the MBS will be backed “by nothing at all” And you can talk yourselves until your blue in the face But that’s how central bank plumbing works. America has to win on every trade deal, and so the U.S. policy is to control other countries by war, because the U.S. can’t win a trade war or run serial trade deficits because it’s deindustrialized and the U.S. Dollar no longer trades global oil. The BRICS solution to the U.S. Trade war is to offer mutual gain, collectivism, and mutual trade. The U.S. empire can only survive by sucking value out of the reset of the world. Which it can no longer do. Because U.S. Treasury bonds no longer serve as the collateral that trades oil to value America’s debt. enjoy your weekend everyone! @BillAckman @sama @JoeBiden @JeffBezos @satyanadella @RobertDowneyJr @gdb @joerogan @FT @WSJ @Forbes @elerianm @BarackObama @unusual_whales @MattWallace888 @KimDotcom @marcorubio @HawleyMO @tedcruz @marklevinshow @gurgavin @MarioNawfal @AOC @MarioNawfal @spectatorindex @TheInsiderPaper @GoldTelegraph_ @thesiriusreport @Prolotario1 @stillgray @disclosetv @htsfhickey @BossBlunts1 @JackStr42679640 @KobeissiLetter @DougAMacgregor @ParikPatelCFA @KanekoaTheGreat @TuckerCarlson @JackFarley96 @TaraBull808 @AltcoinGordon @alx @davidbelle_ @fejau_inc @jsolomonReports @PeterSchiff @PrestonPysh @davidicke @balajis

Saved - December 7, 2023 at 6:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Banks urgently borrowed $200 million through the overnight repo facility, the highest since COVID-19 began. This signals a massive need for cash to prevent margin calls. Money market fund usage collapsed, with excess cash dropping below $800 billion. Bank usage of repo skyrocketed, indicating overleveraging and under-capitalization. Both trends are bearish, leading to liquidity issues, margin calls, fire sales, and surging heavily shorted assets like precious metals and meme stocks.

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

EMERGENCY 🚨 BANKS BORROWED $200 MILLION IN OVERNIGHT REPO FACILITY‼️ 🙊 THIS IS THE HIGHEST REPO SINCE THE ONSET OF COVID SHUTDOWNS AND SIGNALS A MASSIVE NEED FOR CASH TO PREVENT MARGIN CALLS FROM 0 TO $200 MILLION OVERNIGHT 📉 REVERSE REPO: MONEY MARKET FUND USAGE COLLAPSING AS EXCESS CASH PLUMMETED TO UNDER $800 BILLION 📈 REPO (NOT REVERSE): BANK USAGE ROCKETED, INDICATING WITHOUT A DOUBT THAT BANKS ARE OVERLEVERAGED AND UNDER-CAPITALIZED 🙉 BOTH ARE CORRELATED IN OPPOSITE WAYS. DECREASE IN REVERSE REPO IS BEARISH. INCREASE IN REPO IS BEARISH. BOTH HAVE BEEN OCCURING EXACTLY AS PREDICTED. CALL YOUR PARENTS 😬 LACK OF LIQUIDITY LEADS TO MARGIN CALLS, FIRE SALES OF BLUE CHIP STOCKS AND BONDS, AND SKYROCKETING OF HEAVILY SHORTED EQUITIES AND ASSETS SUCH AS PRECIOUS METALS, MEME STOCKS, INVERSE ETF'S AND INDEXES. #amc #gme #silver #gold #uvxy #vix #sqqq #vvix #sjim #bbbyq

@BossBlunts1 - The Butcher of Wall Street Marcel Kalinovic

BREAKING 🚨 REVERSE REPO OPERATIONS TODAY FELL OVER $100 BILLION‼️ MONEY MARKET (MUTUAL) FUNDS AND BANKS USE THE REPO/REVERSE REPO TO STASH CASH IN HIGHLY LIQUID US TREASURY NOTES. THIS ALLOWS THEM TO RECEIVE THE FED FUNDS RATE + 0.05% APR IN OVERNIGHT LOANS IN EXCHANGE FOR T BILLS AND DO THE OPPOSITE THE FOLLOWING DAY. THE FED HAS IMPLEMENTED NEW INCREASED INITIAL MARGIN REQUIREMENTS THAT HAVE RAISED THE MINIMUM CAPITAL LEVEL REQ'D FOR AMERICA'S TOP FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. AS LIQUIDITY IS SUCKED OUT OF THE SYSTEM BY THE #RRP, THIS LEAVES BANKS WITH LESS CAPITAL WITH WHICH TO MEET #MARGIN COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS. THIS HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CAUSE A FIRE SALE OF ASSETS SHOULD THE BANKS BE MARGIN CALLED BY THE DTC, OCC, NSCC, etc, AND/OR THE HEDGE FUNDS & FAMILY OFFICES TO WHICH SAID BANKS LEND SHARES & CASH TO BE MARGIN CALLED BY THEIR PRIME BROKER (BANK). WE ARE SEEING THE BEGINNINGS OF A LIQUIDITY CRISIS MEANWHILE THE FED HAS ONLY UNWOUND 10% OF THEIR #MBS VALUED OVER $2.7 TRILLION. A HOUSING CORRECTION HAS BEGUN AS NEW HOME SALE PRICES ARE DOWN 20% YoY, EXISTING HOME SALE NUMBERS HAVE COLLAPSED TO 2009 LEVELS, AND EXISTING HOME SUPPLY HAS JUST BEGUN TO INCREASE. BANKS HAVE A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL MBS AND A VALUE AT RISK FOR THE TOP 4 U.S. BANKS OF OVER $719 BILLION. MEANWHILE GOLDMAN HAS 45% OF THEIR DEPOSITS UNINSURED BY THE FDIC, AND JPMORGAN 55% UNINSURED. THEYRE ALL BETTING ON A FEDERALLY FUNDED BAILOUT WITH YOUR MONEY IN THE FACE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF THE WORST RECESSION AND STAGFLATION THIS COUNTRY HAS EVER SEEN DUE TO THE PONZI SCHEME THAT IS EXACERBATED BY THE RECORD LEVEL OF C19 MONEY PRINTING BAILOUTS GIVEN TO INSTITUTIONS IN 2020 IN RESPONSE TO THE COLLAPSE OF THE #RRP ON SEPT 19, 2019 WHEN THE FED HAD TO TAKE OVER THE REPO OPERATIONS TO PREVENT A FULL BLOWN #STOCKMARKET COLLAPSE AT THAT TIME‼️ THESE ARE THE DEATH THROES OF A MONETARY SYSTEM PONZI SCHEME THAT WILL HAVE AN INEVITABLE IMPACT ON THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND ALL OF OUR FINANCES, EVEN IF INVISIBLE AT FIRST GLANCE MUCH LIKE THE INFLATION OF THE LAST 2 YEARS. SILVER LINING? HEAVILY SHORTED STOCKS, FUNDS, AND PRECIOUS METALS TEND TO 🚀 IN TIMES LIKE THIS. I.E. #VW, #GOLD, #SILVER, #VIX ETC IN OCT 2008 & ONWARDS JUST 13 DAYS AFTER THE WORST DAYS IN #SP500 HISTORY SAW A 13% LOSS ON A SINGLE DAY. #AMC #GAMESTOP #PSLV #SILVER #GOLD #VIX #UVXY #MINERS #HYMC #SLV #SPROTT #PRECIOUSMETALS

Saved - December 14, 2023 at 5:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This weekend, there are concerns of a liquidity and credit crisis as banks and online payment systems face outages in Europe and the US. Talks of a crisis are spreading rapidly. On Monday, there may be a stock market drop of 20%, with rumors of major banks being insolvent. Cryptos may crash and become illiquid. The situation worsens on Tuesday with a total meltdown in the Eurozone, leading to social protests and further stock market drops. By Wednesday, housing prices crash, and the US government faces collapse. The week ends with voter fraud data being dumped online, adding to the turmoil.

@timothybumper - KobeJordan

This just may be THE weekend…. 🧐 “There will be a liquidity and credit crisis as the banks and online payment systems are about to suffer a huge outage in Europe and the United States. There are already talks of a liquidity and credit crisis happening in inner circles…this is HUGE. Saturday - Banks and online payment systems will suffer an outage in Europe and the US,, spreading worldwide. Talks of a Liquidity and credit crisis happening will spread rapidly. Sunday - Customers will try to get money from banks but will be turned away. Talks of Bank Runs on X(Twitter) and Facebook will be promptly banned. Late Sunday night Euro zone banks will suffer a liquidity issue and fail critical margin levels. Monday - liquidity crisis contagion will spread to the US. Financial instruments, much like those by Archegos, will blow up across the entire financial sector. BoA, JPM, and Goldman Sachs are rumored to be insolvent, along with others. The super rich will attempt pull their money out of the banks…only to be denied. Stock market will drop 20% and is closed for the day. Tether and other coins will fail..causing most cryptos to crash as they become illiquid. Short term,,, most cryptos become worthless. Tuesday - Eurozone total meltdown. Bank deposits are bailed and most people will lose all their money. Social protests erupt(more of them). US stock market will drop another 20% before being again halted for the day. Hedge funds will collapse and banks are stuck with meme stock shorts,, which will reveal to be in the trillions. Banks fail critical margin levels and DTCC will be forced to cover the shorts. DTCC insurance policy will fail as the insurers never had the money to begin with,, and the Federal Reserve is stuck holding the bag. Wednesday - stock market will drop another 20% before being stopped. Subprime finally hits, and housing prices crash by 50% and more. Meme stock, silver, gold, commodity trading is frozen and halted,, but this will only make the problem worse. Dollar insolvency is all over the international news, while silver and gold skyrocket. US Bonds will be dumped, sending interest rates into the stratosphere. MSM will then blare the Great Depression 2.0 and the collapse is here. Thursday- the US government will begin to collapse, and the pressure on the “current administration” to resign. Stock market will drop even more for a total of 85-90% since crash on Monday. Grocery stores will now be empty, as supply chains completely break down. Rumors of a coup against the US gov. will begin to pick up on social media,, gaining public approval. Massive protests(more) against the government, Wall Street and banks will erupt. Police will be deployed and attempt to brutally suppress the protests, but they will be unsuccessful. Friday - voter fraud data is going to be dumped on the internet(already partially happened)…adding fuel to the fire. It will reveal stolen elections, dating back 40 years. Government figures will then go into hiding. Meme stock and silver/commodities shorts issue reaches international media, and heads of State will demand answers from the US , because they are too exposed through strange financial instruments. BRICS will pick up steam to replace the dollar then and now. Dollar is declared non-grata in many countries(already happened) in the world with legislation fast tracked to convert dollar denominated debt to other fiat to prevent a total credit freeze.”

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 10:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2024, the "hide till maturity" trick used by banks to avoid losses on underwater assets may hit a maturity wall. If forced to sell these assets before maturity or if they mature without full repayment, losses become real. The Fed's #BTFP helped banks in 2023, but the second weakness of this trick remains a problem. The US Treasury Department will compete to raise trillions of dollars while private corporate debt matures, potentially causing a crisis in commercial real estate. The NBER estimates that 14.3% of CRE loans are in negative equity, and banks may face over $100 billion in losses. The financial system has many other problems that cannot be solved by rate cuts or money printing. The debt hangover after the bullish year for stocks in 2024 may be brutal.

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨 2024 - THE YEAR WHEN THE "HIDE TILL MATURITY" TRICK HITS THE MATURITY WALL AND BREAKS? 🤷🏻‍♂️ 🚨 During 2023, we have discussed so often how (ridiculously insolvent) banks have made extensive use of "Hold To Maturity" accounting to the point that it is now more appropriate to rename it "Hide Till Maturity" (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1728786228211015966?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA). Dump any asset with a market value implying a steep loss in the HTM books, and the loss is "gone". However, this trick has two significant weaknesses: 1 - If you are forced to sell the underwater assets in HTM books before maturity, then the loss turns from "paper" into "real". 2 - If the asset matures, hence ceases to be eligible for HTM accounting, and the principal isn't repaid in full, then the paper loss becomes a real one again. In 2023, the FED took care of the first weakness with the #BTFP (non-bailout 😉) that effectively allowed banks in liquidity crisis to borrow against the nominal value of their US Treasuries rather than the market one, dodging a forced selling that would have likely triggered a domino of regional bank bankruptcies. As I explained in a post almost 3 months ago (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1714455707003830741?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA), big banks too are benefiting from the #BTFP, which is why the only scenario in which this program isn't extended this coming March is the one where the #FED led by Jerome Burns goes totally out of its mind. 🙄 The second weakness, greatly ignored by #FOMO #stocks investors, not only is about to become a major issue but is also a problem that the #FED and other Central Banks cannot tackle, avoiding the "bailout" shame. Good luck putting together another official financial system bailout in a big election year, not only in the #US but also in other G7 countries like #Japan and the #UK. ⚠️ BEWARE - #FED CUTTING RATES DOESN'T FIX A BORROWER'S INSOLVENCY PROBLEM BECAUSE ITS PROBLEM IS NOT THE COST OF *FUTURE* DEBT BUT THE DEBT *ALREADY* ACCUMULATED. In 2024, you will have the US Treasury Department competing in the open market to raise Trillions of $USD (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1723825931503194398?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA), at the same time when 5+ Trillion $USD [Picture 1] of private corporate debt (bond + loans) matures, and, as if this wasn't already enough, a lot of this private debt is going to be impossible to refinance because no one wants to be that last bag holder of a zombie company without the guarantee of a publicly sponsored TARP-like bailout fund. Simplifying all in a sentence: the "hide till maturity" trick is about to hit the (debt) maturity wall, literally speaking. 🫣 Which sector is the one likely to implode first? Commercial Real Estate. The National Bureau of Economic Research estimates just released in December [Picture 2] portray a situation beyond horrible and now hard to ignore for Banks like they did before (post in quote below). According to the NBER, 14.3% of CRE loans are in NEGATIVE EQUITY status. Many of the remaining ones are expected to face cash flow and refinancing issues due to the high Loan-To-Value in place (average 80%) and almost double debt costs in the current interest rate environment. At ~14% default rate, US banks already face more than 100bn$ of losses according to the NBER [Picture 3]. How to solve the issue then if #Fed rate cuts are useless here? The NBER suggests: "A near-term solution could consider a market-based recapitalization of the U.S. banking system" [Picture 4]. Translated: BANKS NEED A BAILOUT 🙄 We know that CRE is only the tip of the iceberg of the financial system problems. Credit Cards debt, buy now pay later consumer loans, student debt, and on and on. The list is pretty long, and none of these issues can be fixed with either a rate cut or money printing because capital is all that matters to sustain credit losses and avoid insolvency materializing into bankruptcy. Perhaps 2024 will be another irrationally exuberant #bullish year for #stocks, but once the party ends, because for sure it will, the “debt hangover” this time around will be brutal.

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨 WHICH BANKS ARE AT RISK OF GOING BUST IN A LIQUIDITY CRISIS BECAUSE ALREADY (RIDICULOUSLY) INSOLVENT? 🚨 Thank you for waiting, but I assure you what follows isn't going to disappoint you! 😁 Two months ago in "This time is NOT different - Part 2," I flagged…

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨THE BIG BANKS ARE ALREADY UTILIZING THE FED BTFP! 🚨 What do $JPM, $C, $WFC, $PNC, $SCHW, $BAC, and $GS have in common at the moment (besides greed)? They are all losing a shit ton of money... The top spot goes to $BAC, currently carrying $135bn "paper losses"…

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨WHY, WITHOUT QE, THE US TREASURY WILL “KILL A LOT OF ZOMBIES" AND SPARK MASS UNEMPLOYMENT🚨 After last Friday's close, Moody's announced their decision to revise the outlook for the US Government Debt Credit Rating to "Negative". Ok, technically speaking, it…

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

⚠️The great paradox of CRE lending: while owners are freaking out, banks are chilling 🫣 Q2 US bank earnings reported so far paint such a rosy picture of CRE loan risk. Yes, they admit there will be an uptick in losses (maybe), but banks barely show any concern. So why are CRE landlords panicking, not being shy with the press, describing the situation as "apocalyptic" or "a Cat 5 Hurricane"? 🤔 This is how the BIS, the "central bank of central banks," defines CRE loan risk: "the prospects for servicing the loan materially depend on the cash flows generated by the property securing the loan rather than on the underlying capacity of the borrower to service the debt from other sources." According to this (flawed) metric, as long as the property has enough tenants to cover the interests, then the loan wouldn't be considered problematic. This valuation approach applies to "Close-end residential loans" (CERL) where the borrower is typically a corporate landlord that rents the properties. Hence, these assets are as well materially dependent on the ability of these to generate enough income to cover interests. Here is the mind-blowing fact: despite what happened in 2008, banks still need to appraise the principal value of real estate collateral only if they are the principal occupant of the property. 🙄 Remember what triggered the 2008 GFC? Yes, interest-only loans... 🤯 So when will CRE ($2.9T) and CERL ($2.3T) start to be a problem for US banks? Most of these loans are "non-recurring," meaning the landlord can hand over the keys to the lender and walk away. While, as of now, CERL properties' vacancy rates are still at historical average ( $BREIT investors can take a sigh of relief), CRE vacancy rates are increasing fast and currently at 18.6%, a level seen last time during the CRE glut of the early '90s. This is an aggregated number, though. If we split it into Cat A, Cat B, and Cat C CRE office buildings, according to CRE office landlords, the vacancy for the last two categories is already at 50% and 70% in some prime locations like NYC, LA, and SF, with many Cat C buildings already completely empty, badly in need of heavy renovations, and practically worthless. Then it shouldn't come as a surprise that big landlords like Brookfield and Starwood started to default on their CRE loans and hand over the properties to banks. Why are CRE landlords so catastrophic? Because the trend is spreading to Cat A buildings with sub-lease availability climbing fast, signaling tenants' intention to downsize as soon as their agreements expire (unless they walk away earlier than that). Accounting for the current sublease rates reported by CBRE, the real vacancy rate of CRE is already beyond 25% in aggregate 😳 When the banks get hold of a property, they need to start assessing its "value," but again here no problem on the surface since prices are holding up pretty well... in aggregate! What about Cat B and Cat C? The latest transactions reported a drop in prices already up to 35% in the first category and up to 60% for the second one 🥶 during the GFC, CRE property prices declined ~30% at the bottom of the crisis... now the crisis didn't even start! ⚠️ Considering the average LTV for a CRE loan is ~75%, banks are already "losing" on their principal, and this is only the beginning 🥵 It's impossible to make forecasts at this stage, but banks (and regulators) are dangerously ignoring the risk banks will end up holding a huge amount of Cat B and Cat C worthless CRE. Isn't this what's exactly happening in China? Look at how things are going there, with even state-backed developers defaulting on their debt (#Wanda and #Greenland), and #stocks already trading at the same levels as during the GFC 🚨 Add to this banks' mounting liquidity problems, with FHLB advances already at ATH beyond GFC levels and an ongoing deposits hemorrhage, and you have the perfect setup for the mother of all banking crises. 🤯 Suggested read: https://nymag.com/press/2023/07/the-panic-and-pivot-of-manhattans-office-megalandlords.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentioned that further signs of improvement are needed before reducing the stimulus. They highlighted that economic growth in Q1 was driven by increased demand from US households and businesses, offsetting the decline in government spending. However, the job market remains weak, with high unemployment rates and long-term unemployment. The central bank is currently injecting $85 billion into the economy monthly to keep borrowing costs low and promote investment, hiring, and economic growth. Although consumer spending on items like cars and housing is increasing, more action is required.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They will need to see further signs of improvement before easing off on that stimulus. He told the congressional joint economic committee Speaker 1: Economic growth in the Q1 was supported by continuing expansion in demand by US households and businesses, which more than offset the drag from declines in government spending, especially defense spending. Despite this improvement, the job market remains weak overall. The The unemployment rate is still well above its longer run normal level. Rates of long term unemployment are historically high, and the labor force participation rate has continued to move Move down. Speaker 0: The central bank's currently pumping $85,000,000,000 into the economy each month by buying treasury and mortgage bonds. That's to keep borrowing costs low and encourage investment, hiring, and economic growth. But Anke as it is working with consumer spending rising on things like cars and housing, but more is needed.
On the Cover: The Panic and Pivot of Manhattan’s Office Megalandlords On the Cover of New York Magazine: The panic and pivot of Manhattan’s office megalandlords. Andrew Rice writes on the crisis of historically high post-pandemic office vacancy rates. nymag.com
Saved - January 25, 2024 at 10:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Reserve has implemented the BTFP program, which is benefiting big banks like JPM, C, WFC, PNC, SCHW, BAC, and GS. However, investors are mistakenly assuming that the program will cover losses in the credit space, which is not the case. Banks are manipulating their numbers to beat expectations, and investors are turning a blind eye. European banks will likely face even bigger losses due to government bonds. Without the BTFP, banks will struggle to hide their losses. The Fed wants banks to use the discount window, but this may reveal their insolvency. Investors will now scrutinize banks' books more seriously. The Fed's announcement has shocked many, and it signifies a significant change in the banking sector.

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

🚨BREAKING: THE #FED JUST PULLED THE PLUG TO BANKS #BTFP LIFE SUPPORT🚨 1 - I was wrong, I never thought they had the guts to do it 2 - Read my post below from months ago to understand how critical is the #BTFP to keep the whole financial system together Fasten your seatbelts! https://t.co/39DOOewK62

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨THE BIG BANKS ARE ALREADY UTILIZING THE FED BTFP! 🚨 What do $JPM, $C, $WFC, $PNC, $SCHW, $BAC, and $GS have in common at the moment (besides greed)? They are all losing a shit ton of money... The top spot goes to $BAC, currently carrying $135bn "paper losses" in its belly, followed by $C and $WFC, both at around $100bn. True, these losses are only due to the increase in interest rates, and the US will never default on its debt (because if it does, we go back to barter). Hence, these are "paper losses," and banks are in great shape, right! Well... thanks to the FED's "virtual bailout," better known as the BTFP program they are already benefiting from… Wait what? Yes sir! Why am I saying that the big banks are already utilizing the #BTFP? Am I nuts? No, I am not, and I will explain why. Because of the #BTFP potential total capacity of up to $2T, investors are already associating its benefits with the big banks, even if they are not tapping into it (yet). Wait a second, doesn't the #BTFP expire in 5 months? Well... if Jerome Burns wants the world to keep believing the #FED will maintain rates "higher for longer," he has no alternative but to extend the duration of the program, making it "temporarily permanent," just like they did for Quantitative Easing before (for example). The FED enjoys keeping its cake and eating it too, so rest assured their habits will not change. 😌 There is a problem, though. The #BTFP only covers US Treasuries, Agencies, and Government Guaranteed MBS. Here is where investors are making a big (big) mistake. ⚠️They are assuming that if the time comes, the "BTFP cocoon" will transform into a "TARP butterfly"! 🐛 This is the only rational explanation for the market willingly ignoring what's going on in the Credit space, starting from Commercial Real Estate, and not "punishing" the Big Banks for the ridiculously low Credit Loss Provisions they booked for Q3. Another sign of this general thought lies in Credit Spreads across all rating spectrums "refusing" to increase. [https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1713812823938384383?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA]. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Banks are as smart as foxes, and they have seized the opportunity. Have you noticed that Credit Loss Provisions for Q3 are consistently lower than Q2 for all the banks that reported so far, despite the increase in Non-Performing Loans (and a general skyrocketing of Chapter 11 filings)? While before, I felt a bit lonely, I have to admit that now it is so obvious that banks are "twisting" the numbers so much to "beat expectations" that they are at odds with the reality everyone can observe. Although we cannot blame them too much when the government, which should police them, is doing exactly the same. 🙈 So here we are today, with banks faking their numbers in plain sight, and investors being happy about that. 🤦🏻‍♂️ In just a few decades, we have literally moved from the concept of an "Intelligent Investor" to an "Ignorant Investor." The reporting season is only beginning, and I am particularly curious to see how European banks will fare, starting from UB-C-S 😬, and how they will manage to hide the even bigger losses government bonds are digging into their HTM books. Notice I said "losses" and not "paper losses" because in Europe, they don't have a BTFP (yet). Considering the outrageously high inflation in a contingent that is barely growing its GDP, it will be very hard for politicians to endorse another inflative Central Bank weapon of mass wealth destruction. 😵‍💫

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentioned that further signs of improvement are needed before reducing stimulus. Economic growth in Q1 was driven by increased demand from US households and businesses, offsetting declines in government spending. However, the job market remains weak, with high unemployment rates and a decrease in labor force participation. Currently, the central bank is injecting $85 billion into the economy monthly to keep borrowing costs low and stimulate investment, hiring, and economic growth. Consumer spending on cars and housing has increased, but more action is required.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They will need to see further signs of improvement before easing off on that stimulus. He told the congressional joint economic committee Speaker 1: Economic growth in the Q1 was supported by continuing expansion in demand by US households and businesses, which more than offset the drag from declines in government spending, especially defense spending. Despite this improvement, the job market remains weak overall. The The unemployment rate is still well above its longer run normal level. Rates of long term unemployment are historically high, and the labor force participation rate has continued to move Move down. Speaker 0: The central bank's currently pumping $85,000,000,000 into the economy each month by buying treasury and mortgage bonds. That's to keep borrowing costs low and encourage investment, hiring, and economic growth. But Anke as it is working with consumer spending rising on things like cars and housing, but more is needed.

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

My comment on this news 👇🏻

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨WITHOUT THE #FED #BTFP, BANKS WILL NOW HAVE A HARDER TIME TO “HIDE TILL MATURITY” THEIR LOSSES 🤷🏻‍♂️🚨 I started the year writing about how in 2024 the practice used by banks of hiding their losses in Hold to Maturity books (hence “hide till maturity”) would have come to an end [Post Below]. However, I was wrong there, because I wrote this: “As I explained in a post almost 3 months ago (x.com/dariocpx/statu…), big banks too are benefiting from the #BTFP, which is why the only scenario in which this program isn't extended this coming March is the one where the #FED led by Jerome Burns goes totally out of its mind.” Well.. As per the #FED press release that just came out at 7pm EST today (Picture 1), either our dear Jerome Burns finally realized what it means to be a Central Banker, or he lost his mind and unintentionally just rug pulled half of the US banking sector. There is a potential third justification for the #FOMC action though: okay, we are in a US election year, and a bull market is good for the incumbent president, but looking at what’s happening with $NVDA, imagine if this idiocy pops before November from a much higher market cap, and Biden ends up being forced to bail out hedge funds, fraudsters, and gamblers singing “Kumbaya!” all together on this stock right now. 🙄 Please let me know in the comments what do you thinks is the reason that pushed the #FED to do what they just did. Nevertheless, the outcome is not going to change, and this is what’s coming. 🚩 THE #FED WILL STOP “LEAKING” LIQUIDITY As you can see in Picture 2, the #BTFP was effectively #FED QE in disguise, and it is not a coincidence that the #stocks bubble re-inflated once the net liquidity in the system resumed its climb. 🚩 THE #FED WANTS (TO TEACH) BANKS TO USE THE DISCOUNT WINDOW There are two reasons why banks don’t like to go (and beg) at the #FED discount window: 1 - Makes their liquidity issues manifest. 2 - The discount applied to the assets they want to pledge for liquidity (usually the best they can offer) will reveal the true value of their HTM books and, likely, their insolvency. Now here is where the #FED is making a big mistake. Many US Regional Banks right now have an insolvency problem, hence they need capital. Accessing liquidity at the discount window won’t have any impact on the radioactive defaults in their Loans books. Imagine my shock if they already have a new TARP plan drafted out at the #FED but they hope there won’t be a need to disclose it before November. 🚩 INVESTORS WILL NOW SCRUTINISE BANKS' BOOKS MORE SERIOUSLY So far this year, the US banks' earnings season has been horrible, to say the least. Ask anyone working in a bank how’s the mood there and what do they expect the business to go in the near future; while in #stocks, the morale is through the roof, bankers' one is through the floor. Despite this, bank #stocks have been doing okay since the Q4-23 earnings season started. Why? Because the #FED “got it covered” with its magic wand that could fix everything like, for example, empty shopping mall loans stuck in the books of a bank somewhere and now worth not even the cost of the material build that shopping mall to begin with. Management at banks like $BAC totally embraced this thinking to the point there is barely a trace of CRE crisis in their results 🙈: https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1746581808538689762?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA Personally, I couldn’t believe my eyes 1 hour ago when the #FED announcement popped up on my screen, I even went to check if it could have been a deep fake or, like what happened to their #SEC cousins, the #FED too didn’t use a 2FA to protect their X account. But no, the official announcement was there on their website (Picture 3) and all it missed were 2 words at the end of it: “GAME OVER” 😐

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 10:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent #FED announcement indicates that banks will no longer be able to hide their losses. This may have unintended consequences for the US banking sector. The #FED wants banks to use the discount window, but this could reveal insolvency issues. Investors will now scrutinize banks' books more seriously. The announcement came as a shock, but it is a game-changer for the industry.

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨WITHOUT THE #FED #BTFP, BANKS WILL NOW HAVE A HARDER TIME TO “HIDE TILL MATURITY” THEIR LOSSES 🤷🏻‍♂️🚨 I started the year writing about how in 2024 the practice used by banks of hiding their losses in Hold to Maturity books (hence “hide till maturity”) would have come to an end [Post Below]. However, I was wrong there, because I wrote this: “As I explained in a post almost 3 months ago (x.com/dariocpx/statu…), big banks too are benefiting from the #BTFP, which is why the only scenario in which this program isn't extended this coming March is the one where the #FED led by Jerome Burns goes totally out of its mind.” Well.. As per the #FED press release that just came out at 7pm EST today (Picture 1), either our dear Jerome Burns finally realized what it means to be a Central Banker, or he lost his mind and unintentionally just rug pulled half of the US banking sector. There is a potential third justification for the #FOMC action though: okay, we are in a US election year, and a bull market is good for the incumbent president, but looking at what’s happening with $NVDA, imagine if this idiocy pops before November from a much higher market cap, and Biden ends up being forced to bail out hedge funds, fraudsters, and gamblers singing “Kumbaya!” all together on this stock right now. 🙄 Please let me know in the comments what do you thinks is the reason that pushed the #FED to do what they just did. Nevertheless, the outcome is not going to change, and this is what’s coming. 🚩 THE #FED WILL STOP “LEAKING” LIQUIDITY As you can see in Picture 2, the #BTFP was effectively #FED QE in disguise, and it is not a coincidence that the #stocks bubble re-inflated once the net liquidity in the system resumed its climb. 🚩 THE #FED WANTS (TO TEACH) BANKS TO USE THE DISCOUNT WINDOW There are two reasons why banks don’t like to go (and beg) at the #FED discount window: 1 - Makes their liquidity issues manifest. 2 - The discount applied to the assets they want to pledge for liquidity (usually the best they can offer) will reveal the true value of their HTM books and, likely, their insolvency. Now here is where the #FED is making a big mistake. Many US Regional Banks right now have an insolvency problem, hence they need capital. Accessing liquidity at the discount window won’t have any impact on the radioactive defaults in their Loans books. Imagine my shock if they already have a new TARP plan drafted out at the #FED but they hope there won’t be a need to disclose it before November. 🚩 INVESTORS WILL NOW SCRUTINISE BANKS' BOOKS MORE SERIOUSLY So far this year, the US banks' earnings season has been horrible, to say the least. Ask anyone working in a bank how’s the mood there and what do they expect the business to go in the near future; while in #stocks, the morale is through the roof, bankers' one is through the floor. Despite this, bank #stocks have been doing okay since the Q4-23 earnings season started. Why? Because the #FED “got it covered” with its magic wand that could fix everything like, for example, empty shopping mall loans stuck in the books of a bank somewhere and now worth not even the cost of the material build that shopping mall to begin with. Management at banks like $BAC totally embraced this thinking to the point there is barely a trace of CRE crisis in their results 🙈: https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1746581808538689762?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA Personally, I couldn’t believe my eyes 1 hour ago when the #FED announcement popped up on my screen, I even went to check if it could have been a deep fake or, like what happened to their #SEC cousins, the #FED too didn’t use a 2FA to protect their X account. But no, the official announcement was there on their website (Picture 3) and all it missed were 2 words at the end of it: “GAME OVER” 😐

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨 BANK OF AMERICA WENT “CRAZY” IN Q4 (LITERALLY) 🚨 While digging into $BAC's Q4-23 financial statements, I couldn't help but wonder if they had lost their minds during the last three months of 2023. No, I am not referring to the “press release” or the… https://t.co/rUGDidaSVE

@DarioCpx - JustDario 🏊‍♂️

#JustDarioDaily 🚨 2024 - THE YEAR WHEN THE "HIDE TILL MATURITY" TRICK HITS THE MATURITY WALL AND BREAKS? 🤷🏻‍♂️ 🚨 During 2023, we have discussed so often how (ridiculously insolvent) banks have made extensive use of "Hold To Maturity" accounting to the point that it is now more appropriate to rename it "Hide Till Maturity" (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1728786228211015966?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA). Dump any asset with a market value implying a steep loss in the HTM books, and the loss is "gone". However, this trick has two significant weaknesses: 1 - If you are forced to sell the underwater assets in HTM books before maturity, then the loss turns from "paper" into "real". 2 - If the asset matures, hence ceases to be eligible for HTM accounting, and the principal isn't repaid in full, then the paper loss becomes a real one again. In 2023, the FED took care of the first weakness with the #BTFP (non-bailout 😉) that effectively allowed banks in liquidity crisis to borrow against the nominal value of their US Treasuries rather than the market one, dodging a forced selling that would have likely triggered a domino of regional bank bankruptcies. As I explained in a post almost 3 months ago (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1714455707003830741?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA), big banks too are benefiting from the #BTFP, which is why the only scenario in which this program isn't extended this coming March is the one where the #FED led by Jerome Burns goes totally out of its mind. 🙄 The second weakness, greatly ignored by #FOMO #stocks investors, not only is about to become a major issue but is also a problem that the #FED and other Central Banks cannot tackle, avoiding the "bailout" shame. Good luck putting together another official financial system bailout in a big election year, not only in the #US but also in other G7 countries like #Japan and the #UK. ⚠️ BEWARE - #FED CUTTING RATES DOESN'T FIX A BORROWER'S INSOLVENCY PROBLEM BECAUSE ITS PROBLEM IS NOT THE COST OF *FUTURE* DEBT BUT THE DEBT *ALREADY* ACCUMULATED. In 2024, you will have the US Treasury Department competing in the open market to raise Trillions of $USD (https://x.com/dariocpx/status/1723825931503194398?s=46&t=Hz7-qku8ZNVPw6L9nBJOZA), at the same time when 5+ Trillion $USD [Picture 1] of private corporate debt (bond + loans) matures, and, as if this wasn't already enough, a lot of this private debt is going to be impossible to refinance because no one wants to be that last bag holder of a zombie company without the guarantee of a publicly sponsored TARP-like bailout fund. Simplifying all in a sentence: the "hide till maturity" trick is about to hit the (debt) maturity wall, literally speaking. 🫣 Which sector is the one likely to implode first? Commercial Real Estate. The National Bureau of Economic Research estimates just released in December [Picture 2] portray a situation beyond horrible and now hard to ignore for Banks like they did before (post in quote below). According to the NBER, 14.3% of CRE loans are in NEGATIVE EQUITY status. Many of the remaining ones are expected to face cash flow and refinancing issues due to the high Loan-To-Value in place (average 80%) and almost double debt costs in the current interest rate environment. At ~14% default rate, US banks already face more than 100bn$ of losses according to the NBER [Picture 3]. How to solve the issue then if #Fed rate cuts are useless here? The NBER suggests: "A near-term solution could consider a market-based recapitalization of the U.S. banking system" [Picture 4]. Translated: BANKS NEED A BAILOUT 🙄 We know that CRE is only the tip of the iceberg of the financial system problems. Credit Cards debt, buy now pay later consumer loans, student debt, and on and on. The list is pretty long, and none of these issues can be fixed with either a rate cut or money printing because capital is all that matters to sustain credit losses and avoid insolvency materializing into bankruptcy. Perhaps 2024 will be another irrationally exuberant #bullish year for #stocks, but once the party ends, because for sure it will, the “debt hangover” this time around will be brutal.

Saved - February 11, 2024 at 11:00 AM

@McSqueezyTheCow - McSqueezyTheCow

Friendly reminder that the New York Fed backstopped #UBS through its reverse repo facility.

@McSqueezyTheCow - McSqueezyTheCow

The New York Fed provided a backstop to UBS [Credit Suisse] in August. ----- Now that I have your attention, let's play a story in three parts; picture edition. Part I: Part II: Part III: ----- Now let's make it all make sense; a timeline. OCTOBER 2022 • Credit Suisse announces plan to "refocus on banking for the wealthy, including a 4 billion Swiss franc ($4 billion) capital raising, a headcount reduction of 9,000 jobs by end-2025" -- MARCH 2023 • 2022 annual report identifies "material weaknesses" in internal controls over financial reporting • After Saudi National Bank said it could not provide more support because of regulatory constraints, shares dropped by as much as 30% • Credit Suisse secures a $54 billion lifeline from the Swiss central bank to shore up liquidity, the first major global bank to get emergency funding since GFC • "The Swiss authorities provide assurances that Credit Suisse has met 'the capital and liquidity requirements imposed on systemically important banks'" (lols intensify) • Major banks including Societe Generale SA (http://SOGN.PA) and Deutsche Bank AG (http://DBKGn.DE) restrict new trades involving Credit Suisse or its securities • UBS agrees to buy Credit Suisse for 3 billion Swiss francs ($3.23 billion) (We discussed this deal previously: https://x.com/McSqueezyTheCow/status/1728317168830599268?s=20) -- JUNE 2023: • "UBS reached an agreement with the Swiss government under which the government will guarantee up to 9 billion Swiss francs ($9.98 billion) of losses UBS may incur from the sale of its rival's assets beyond 5 billion francs the lender is due to cover itself. The government's and UBS' priority was to "minimize potential losses and risks so that recourse to the federal guarantee is avoided to the greatest extent possible," -- JULY 2023: • "UBS Group AG is aiming to avoid using a $10 billion backstop for Credit Suisse amid a backlash" -- And now onto the parts of our story... AUGUST 2023: I. Credit Suisse AG, New York Branch is added as a counterparty of the NY Fed's reverse repo [RRP] facility II. UBS, who owns Credit Suisse, tells the Swiss government it no longer needs the $10 billion backstop. "UBS...said that after reviewing all the Credit Suisse assets covered by the backstop, it concluded the agreement was no longer necessary" (more lols intensify) -- SEPTEMBER 2023: III. UBS Group announces plan to house its investment-banking and trading operations in Credit Suisse’s New York offices. “As we progress with our integration, we continue to prioritize opportunities to drive stronger collaboration and deliver the best of our combined firm to our clients” ----- TLDR: Credit Suisse death spiral led to the Swiss bank being acquired by UBS, which was really a strong-arm take it or leave it arrangement initiated by Swiss National Bank (SNB) and the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) in March. Recall that UBS only had a long weekend to take the "deal". In the weeks to follow, UBS, desperate for help, reached out to the Swiss government and was extended a $10 billion backstop. Then, in a matter of a few weeks, UBS moves its investment-banking and trading operations to Credit Suisse offices in New York--less than 10 minutes away from the NY Federal Reserve--Credit Suisse's NY branch gets added as a counterparty for reverse repos, and UBS suddenly no longer needs the $10 backstop from the Swiss government. Reverse repo data tells us that the day after Credit Suisse AG, New York Branch was added as a counterparty, the daily trade amount jumped $18.17 billion. A coincidence, I'm sure. ----- ...."this is fine!" ----- New York Fed Reverse Repo Counterparties Additions and Removals: https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/rrp_counterparties#additions-and-removals New York Fed Reverse Repo Operations: https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/desk-operations/reverse-repo September 13, 2023 Bloomberg article: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-09-13/ubs-to-move-bankers-traders-to-credit-suisse-s-new-york-offices August 11, 2023 Financial Times article: https://www.ft.com/content/d272fc75-f754-406c-a65e-0b815f16cc86 March 20, 2023 Reuters article: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/ubs-aims-avoid-using-10-bln-credit-suisse-backstop-amid-backlash-ft-2023-07-03/#:~:text=July%202%20(Reuters)%20%2D%20UBS,second%2Dquarter%20results%20on%20Aug. July 3, 2023 Reuters article: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/how-credit-suisse-has-evolved-over-167-years-2023-03-18/

Reverse Repo Counterparties: List & Eligibility Requirements - FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK newyorkfed.org
Reverse Repo Operations - FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK newyorkfed.org
UBS ditches $10bn state backstop for Credit Suisse deal Bank says Swiss government’s protection from losses no longer needed ft.com
Saved - March 29, 2024 at 5:06 PM

@profstonge - Peter St Onge, Ph.D.

Fiscal collapse accelerates as Treasury issues $7 trillion of debt in just 3 months. That matches the worst of Covid -- no pandemic needed. And it's double the previous record that had stood for 231 years. https://t.co/e0W0y2n6cm

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Treasury is issuing record levels of debt, with $7 trillion issued in just 3 months and $23 trillion in a year. This has bloated the treasury market, raising concerns about a potential crash. The economy is propped up by debt, with federal debt rising by $1 trillion every 90 days. US treasuries are seen as cash but are actually promises to pay back in the future. The illusion that all debt will be repaid is crucial, as any doubts could lead to a financial system collapse. Fiscal trends are worsening, with a $2 trillion deficit that will increase during a recession. Collapse seems inevitable without intervention. Visit profsaintonj.com for more details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In case you thought anybody in Washington was driving this thing, they are not. It's official the department of treasury is now issuing debt at pandemic levels. That was twice the previous record, and here we are again. In raw numbers, latest figures for q 4 2023 show treasury issued 7,000,000,000,000 in new debt in just 3 months. For the entire year, it came to 23,000,000,000,000. That has bloated the treasury market. It's now up 60% since the pandemic. In other words, 1 third of outstanding US debt has fresh ink on it. It's also up roughly sixfold since the 2008 crisis. Meaning, if we hit another crash, it could be a lot bigger. At this point, federal debt is rising by $1,000,000,000,000 every 90 days, and US government spending as a percent of GDP is at world war 2 levels. Given we are not in a world war, at least in theory, nor are we in a pandemic, why so much debt? Easy. It is buying growth. As Balaji Srinivasan puts it, the economy isn't real. It's propped up by debt. They will fake it till they break it. Even the Wall Street Journal, who loves debt, is sounding the alarm, writing that rapid growth in debt often ends badly. And given the enormous size and alleged safety of US debt, any, quote, instability could be catastrophic. Why catastrophic? Because US treasuries are treated like cash by everything from banks to pension funds to large corporations and individual 4 one k's. A treasury is essentially seen as cash that pays interest. This is false, of course. A treasury is actually a promise from uncle Sam to pay you back someday, perhaps 20 or 30 years in the future. That means that unlike cash, any concerns that investors might have about uncle Sam's ability or willingness to pay can crash treasuries. Now if that happens, it immediately sends the entire banking system, the pension system, and 100 of corporations into default. Indeed, it could break the payments plumbing that underpins the entire financial system, meaning you you wouldn't be able to get money. Not your salary, not your mortgage, not your groceries. If that all sounds dire, recall that all of these are sustained by the gossamer thin belief that uncle Sam will pay back every last penny with interest. This is curious given that neither voters, who in theory run the country, nor congress, who actually does run the country, seem to think the debt is real. You can actually try this at home. Tell a voter that student loan bailouts will cost a trillion, meaning $10,000,000,000,000 out of their pocket, or that another war will cost $30 out of their pocket. Most don't care because it's not real. So the voters don't think it's real. Congress doesn't think it's real. But literally, everything depends on the illusion that every penny of federal debt will be repaid in full with interest. What could go wrong? So what is next? Brought to you by unchained.com. Every fiscal trend is in the wrong direction. We're already at 2 trillion deficit. It will soar by yet more trillions when recession hits, and it will keep churning with Social Security and Medicare both growing and spending on everything from illegal immigrants to fresh wars. This point, there is nothing standing between us and fiscal collapse. There is no countervailing force. The only question is when. Check out the whole article at profsaintonj.com with charts and all the gory details. Okay? We'll be watching. See you next time.
Saved - May 11, 2024 at 11:26 PM

@GameofTrades_ - Game of Trades

The US govt debt crisis is getting UNREAL This won’t end well A thread 🧵 https://t.co/HZ0E0MsECm

Saved - May 31, 2024 at 3:05 PM

@peruvian_bull - Peruvian Bull

Banks have half a trillion in unrealized losses and the Fed will print every penny of it if any of the GSIBs actually fail https://t.co/IHjmA3G6bh

Saved - December 20, 2024 at 2:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some thoughts on a CFD related to GME, highlighting its connection to the inverted federal funds rate and its potential for profitability. I found some historical instruments from Lehman and others that relate to this. I also asked Grod for a detailed breakdown of the CFD, as I wanted clarity on how it works and its implications for shorting GME. I later corrected a mistake regarding the spread, noting it was -25% instead of 0.025%. Apologies for the confusion; I can't edit the post.

@itsalwaysrains - AlwaysSadButTruthful

oh. okay. so. . . -_- no ones even going to see this on a sunday #nakedswaps ╰(‵□′)╯ the liquidity fed funds were the fund types that i found the lehman wamu bofa citi pre-08 instruments in.. at the end of endgameDD.. well, leg 1 of GME CFD is > floatingRtIndex: USFFE (USD Federal Funds Effective Rate) -spread of 0.025% 2027 expiry. ... its a spread bet, on an inverted federal fund interest rate, which is about to rug, and its set to a 0 spread on GME. weird right? =/ i asked grod to exquisitely detail, the CFD so i didn't have to write it #1 > https://x.com/i/grok/share/q1DKWd1HWSsOGb2knez42QEGE #1 info. #2 explanation per side of the CFD swap. #3 explanation of how these are shorting GME and will moon. #4 summary of this CFD play. grok says it all better than me :(

@itsalwaysrains - AlwaysSadButTruthful

#1 > https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS #2 > FFE summary from brave. looking at the rates for fed fund interest rates, its already inverting. paired with the other swap signals, when this thing crashes, these cfd's should become VERY VERY VERY profitable "#short" #swaps on $GME. #gamestop #swaps #shorts #cfd #MyNameIsItzahBubble!

Federal Funds Effective Rate View data of the Effective Federal Funds Rate, or the interest rate depository institutions charge each other for overnight loans of funds. fred.stlouisfed.org

@itsalwaysrains - AlwaysSadButTruthful

Unfortunately i cant edit this post. I made a clerical mistake, apologies. the spread was -25%. not .025%. it costs .025% of the total if the FFE index goes to .1 like it did in 08 and will do. my bad. idk why i cant edit.

Saved - March 21, 2025 at 11:31 PM

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

FINALLY people are admitting the Federal Reserve & bank cartel caused the 2020 financial crisis, intentionally releasing "the virus" to cover it up! 🥳 Only now it's too late, because they're about to do it again...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Federal Reserve has destabilized the economy and operates with a lack of transparency. Money is a medium of exchange and unit of account; banks profit through fractional reserve banking, creating new money via loans. Central banks, like the Fed, allow governments to spend beyond their means, creating a "fiscal illusion." Prior to the Fed's creation, the gold standard restrained government spending. The Fed was established in 1913 to stabilize the banking system, but the 1933 Banking Act expanded its power, forming the Federal Open Market Committee to manage monetary policy. The Fed's actions lead to boom and bust cycles, intentionally cheapening the dollar's value. The shift to fiat currency in 1971 caused economic uncertainty and stagflation. The Fed's inflationary policies create winners and losers, benefiting the government, large corporations, and political elites at the expense of the average American. Financialization has exploded since going off the gold standard. The Fed's low interest rates inflated the housing bubble in the early 2000s, leading to the 2008 crisis and new interventions. The Fed responded to the 2020 pandemic with inflationary tools, further expanding its power. A Fed-controlled digital currency could magnify this power, enabling control over spending. Austrian economists advocate for ending the Fed, limiting government intervention, and abolishing fractional reserve banking, favoring a market-driven money supply and a return to sound money, possibly linked to gold.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Fed has made the economy more unstable than it was before the Fed. Speaker 1: They, the keeper of the keys of the magic kingdom of money, would rather you didn't understand. Speaker 2: They would like to be thought of as the problem solver that shows up and puts out the fire. But in fact, they're really the arsonist that started the fire to begin with. Speaker 3: For over a century, The United States financial leadership, guided by its central bank, the Federal Reserve, has acquired immense control over the economy. Yet the Fed's dominant role on the global economic stage and its impact on everyday Americans often goes unexamined. It's time to look behind the curtain at this pivotal institution to see how it works, how its decisions have affected our lives, and if we need a Fed to secure our financial future. Before we can dive into deeper analysis of the Fed, there are several fundamental concepts and historical events which are important to understand. The first of which is what is money? Speaker 4: So economists look on money as the general medium of exchange. That is that everyone sells the things that they produce or they sell their services for something that everyone else will accept. Speaker 0: For thousands of years, human civilization settled on gold and silver as the main sources of money. Speaker 4: And in modern society, everyone accepts money. But it's also a common unit of account. And what we mean by that is that it's a pricing unit. So everyone prices their goods and services that they desire to sell in terms of money, which makes it easy for people to compare the prices of different goods. Speaker 3: So where do banks fit in? Speaker 1: People observed that it was cumbersome to carry this around, so bankers came into existence, and bankers would issue a piece of paper that says it's a claim on gold. Whoops, that's a monetary original sin right there. Speaker 0: When banks were invented, they're basically the warehouses of gold or whatever gold that you had, you would be given a certificate that you could use to redeem the gold or whenever you wanted it back. Speaker 4: Money's a commodity, like any other commodity, and it has a supply and demand. In The United States, that's the good old dollar bill. Also checking deposits, which are claims to dollar bills held by banks. Well, the role is to make it easy for people to exchange. Speaker 3: How do banks make a profit? With fractional reserve banking, it involves creating new money out of thin air, but Speaker 5: it comes with risks. Fractional reserve banking is just the idea that banks keep a fraction of deposits in reserve. So like somebody walks in and makes a deposit, what they actually do is they take that money and they use it to finance loans that they make to other people, business loans, mortgages, that sort of thing. Speaker 4: Let's say they can lend out 90%, that they're comfortable with keeping $1 for every $10 that people will deposit. So you can write checks up to $1,000 on that checking deposit, but at the same time, there's 900 more dollars in circulation than there was before you made that deposit. So in that case, they immediately create money. Speaker 3: That new money can then be loaned out by the originating bank and deposited into another bank, which can then loan out a portion of those deposits. Speaker 5: It means that enough depositors could come to the bank requesting the money. The bank would come up dry. They wouldn't have all the money there because they'd use the money to to finance those loans. Speaker 3: Now you may be asking yourself, where does the government fit into all this? Speaker 6: So if we look around the world, we find almost every country has a central bank because central banks are really handy In creating the Bank of France, Napoleon said, I want a bank that'll always lend me money. And that's what all governments want, spend more money than they have. Speaker 4: That's the way they get reelected. If it's financed by taxation, people immediately realize that it's coming out of their own pockets. Speaker 0: And the way it works in politics is the politicians love the Fed because it creates, what economists call a fiscal illusion, a sort of promise of something for nothing. Speaker 5: If everything is guided by all of this money printing and no bank is overextending itself, the whole system is working together and not expanding. That way, the whole system is sort of a cartel. Speaker 4: In other words, all the banks inflate together because they're all under the umbrella now of the Fed. Speaker 3: Prior to the creation of the Fed, people were using gold as money, and the gold standard was a constraint on government spending. Speaker 1: People will say that the dollar was backed by gold. No, it was defined as gold. Very important. Very important distinction. It was defined as a way of gold. And, it was codified in 1900. Gold Standard Act in 1900. People walked around with $20 gold pieces, in their pants pocket. You know, gold was a functional currency. Speaker 0: You weren't gonna experience financial disaster if, if that's what the system was about. And importantly, it restrained the ability of government to do what governments now do is just spend like Santa Claus. Speaker 4: And so in the beginning, that system seemed to work. Speaker 3: If the gold standard worked, why did the government create the central bank we now know as the Federal Reserve? Responding to the pressures of special interests that rose out of the Progressive Era and after years of regional and local banks failing due to fractional reserve banking, in 1913 the Federal Reserve Act was passed by the U. S. Congress and signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson. Speaker 1: The Fed came into being with every legislator promise that the gold standard remained. Speaker 4: The Fed was only supposed to be a lender of last resort. It was only to prevent mass bank failures. Speaker 5: And the goal was to stabilize the banking system, stabilize all the booms and busts that they were seeing. Speaker 3: The act created 12 regional Federal Reserve banks to serve distinct geographic areas of The United States. It required every national bank to become a member and hold stock in their respective regional Federal Reserve Bank. Speaker 1: Each Federal Reserve Bank is a corporation. Every bank in the district must subscribe to shares in the respective reserve banks in proportion to the capital of that private bank. Speaker 6: Federal Reserve Banks are banks. They have balance sheets. They have loans. They have investments. They have deposits. They have borrowed funds. They have capital. It's like a bank. Speaker 3: To manage the system, the act established a seven member Federal Reserve Board, now known as the Board of Governors. The supposed intent was to provide stability, banking expertise, and a diverse range of perspectives. Speaker 6: When the Fed was created, the secretary of the treasury was William Gibbs McAdoo, and he gave a great speech at the time in which he said, now that we have the Fed, financial booms and busts have ended. The Fed has made all of this only in the past, and we're entering a new world where this won't happen. Speaker 0: Then the crash happens, and they find out they lost their job. They lost their business. Speaker 3: In 1933, Congress passed a new banking act supposedly to restore confidence. This act set the stage for the ever changing evolution and increasing power of the Fed. It created the Federal Open Market Committee to manage the Fed's open market operations and formulate monetary policy. Speaker 1: So the Federal Open Market Committee, which consists of all the governors and a selection of the respect reserve banks, so these dozen outposts makes interest rate policy. Speaker 2: And those basically involved buying or selling short term government securities. Speaker 0: The president appoints the chairman of the Fed. Well, it's it's kinda like rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. You could call this institution the Fed or you could call it the government money printing apparatus, but it would create all the same problems. Speaker 1: I think now that boom and bust is the wrong figure of speech. I think that we should use fires and, fire departments putting them out. And the Fed serves a dual purpose. It is both the arsonist and the fireman. Speaker 3: The Austrian business cycle theory says that credit expansion leads to economy wide distortions. This means resources are misdirected toward unsustainable projects. This creates a boom and bust cycle, where an unsustainable economic expansion built on misdirected resources is followed by a sharp decline. Speaker 1: The Fed came into business before you knew it, it was doing the government's work of inflating the currency. Speaker 2: When someone is manipulating the unit that we're all using, that that's gonna have adverse consequences. Speaker 1: The Fed actually intends to cheapen the value of your money by 2% a year. It's kind of this monetary that's giving 2% off the top of whatever you think you earned. Speaker 5: We still have financial crises. We still have booms and busts. Speaker 1: This is the government getting into the act. Speaker 3: And get into the act they did in a big way. Speaker 7: I have directed secretary Connolly to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets except in amounts and conditions determined to be in the interest of monetary stability and in the best interest of The United States. Speaker 6: So in '71, they might have done other things like raise the price of gold, say, well, dollars are worth less, but instead they just said, no, we're not paying, so tough luck. But it was tough luck for the world because that allowed in a pure paper money world, that is to say currency which has no intrinsic value, could be created with no link to gold or other precious metals in peacetime. Speaker 2: It's all fiat currency. It's all just paper. Speaker 1: What is fiat money? Fiat money is the opposite of the inherently valuable gold coin. And thereafter, from that data to this, the dollar has owed its value to habit, to confidence in this great country. Speaker 3: This shift to a fiat currency created dramatic economic uncertainty as foreign exchange markets became volatile. Prices ballooned. Higher costs led to job losses. The combination gave us a new financial term, stagflation, and that became a defining feature of the decade. Speaker 6: And in the middle of that, as a result of the nineteen seventies inflation, then under Paul Volcker, the Federal Reserve forced up interest rates to break the inflation and to break these bubbles. Speaker 3: In the nineteen eighties, these interest rates and a weak economy made it more difficult for governments and banks to repay their debts, contributing to the savings and loan crisis and the debt crisis in Latin America. Speaker 6: And when that great inflation finally stopped in the eighties, we had a lot of markets which had come to rely on the inflation of asset prices and on the printing of money. Speaker 3: Why would the Fed want to use inflation to create winners and losers? Speaker 0: The reason is somebody profits from it. And if somebody's profiting from it, somebody else is losing by it. And it's a really good example of Speaker 5: what the Fed does in a general sense, which is they they create winners and losers. It means that the Fed has fundamentally altered the makeup of the economy. Speaker 4: The Fed creates inflation, and it does so not just because it wants to see prices rise. Because if all prices rose, there'd be no reason for inflation. But in the real world, when money's injected into the economy, some people get it first. Speaker 5: So as as soon as you take on this ability to to bail out some people, it means that you are saying you get to be the winner, and everybody else who doesn't get bailed out, they get to be the losers. Speaker 3: So who are the winners? Speaker 4: They're not elected officials. To some extent, they're doing the bidding of elected officials, Fed bureaucrats, but they're rearranging our lives by by messing with with with the money. Speaker 5: The government is always the winner because when the Fed is printing up new money, it it means that the government can benefit. It means that the government is they're the first spender of Speaker 2: the brand new money. So large corporations, not small corporations. Large banks, not small banks. And then the political elites that sort of control the political system. The people who get the money first are also the same sort of people who have the most influence on the Fed itself. Speaker 0: Politicians can offer this program, that program to benefit everybody, and they don't have Speaker 3: to raise taxes. Now who are the losers? Speaker 2: The average working American and their family unit is who really pays the price, during this cycle of boom and bust, that the Fed is supposedly saving us every time. Speaker 5: It's Econ one zero one. You can't get something from nothing. Physics one zero one as well. And so what that means is it's it's the government taking, and it's the cost of that is going on to everybody else. Speaker 2: Going off the gold standard took away that certainty, and it injected the Fed with more power, which has created more uncertainty. Speaker 6: Now when they print up the money to pay for the loss, that's effectively a debt of the US government. Speaker 2: So every time they tell us that they're solving a problem, what they're really doing is rescuing their own reputation from what they previously brought on. Speaker 6: Unless you're the Fed, you can't stay in business and do that. Speaker 3: When it comes to the economy, it seems crises and the Fed go hand in hand. Speaker 4: The Fed has always used emergencies to expand their powers. Speaker 5: And so as we have more crises that are generated by the Fed and the banking system, it gives them a foundation for new interventions. It gives them a chance to grab more power. Speaker 3: In the wake of the crises of the late twentieth century, after the country went off the gold standard, the financial sector exploded in size as the country shifted away from industrial production. The growing dominance of finance over other sectors of the economy became known as financialization. Speaker 1: So financialization is the treatment of finance not as the means to an end, but as an end in itself. Speaker 2: It doesn't really produce anything by itself. It just helps us with financial matters, with investing, with raising capital, with allocating savings, those kind of things. So we're talking about stocks, bonds, banks, and so forth. Speaker 5: So you can see the financialization of the economy and how the finance, insurance, and real estate companies, that sector has exploded, especially since we went off the gold standard. Speaker 1: These dominant Wall Street banks are now cartels empowered in that regard by the Federal Reserve itself. Speaker 3: And in the new millennium, the Fed seemed to assume a more aggressive role. Speaker 4: The economists in the late nineties and early two thousands to begin to talk about the fact that we were in a great moderation. Speaker 6: What we found out that the great moderation really was was the great leveraging up, the great inflation of money. Speaker 0: And so they use language like that, as do all government bureaucracies, to make things seem much more pleasant than they than they really are. Speaker 4: The Fed used the argument that, well, we have to make sure that unemployment stays low and that production stays high and that growth is going along at a good pace. Speaker 0: The Fed doesn't do anything but but drop interest rates and and and print money. That's all it does. Every time they create a bubble and the bubble bursts, their response is, well, we need to create another bubble. Speaker 5: The Fed worked to push interest rates down below the natural rate, and this is where we saw the housing bubble being inflated. Speaker 2: And, basically, the Fed created a housing bubble after 02/2001 with very low interest rates and a lot of moral suasion for people to buy houses and to be invested in housing. And the American people responded. Speaker 3: So what was the role of big banks and Wall Street in all of this? Speaker 2: We had people in Wall Street, New York banks, who had never even experienced a Fed interest rate hike, never in their entire career. It had only been going down. Speaker 5: And so that encouraged them to take all of those risks. They were making all of these loans. They were helping blow up the housing bubble. Speaker 8: So they put money in the economy and the Fed and everybody looks, the government's rich now and this sort of thing. And before you knew it, there was a big bubble and the bubble was supported by people who wanted a house and get their interest rates low. Speaker 4: Now what do you do then? If you try to increase the money supply, that pushes prices up. That causes the worse inflation. On the other hand, if you try to tighten money, that causes a recession, and and that turns into a full blown downturn. Speaker 9: This could be the most serious recession in decades, and that means life, as most Americans know it, is about to change, in some cases dramatically. Speaker 4: What happened in 02/2008 was that some of the big investment banks, the ones that are most closely tied into government, were affected. And those people are the movers and the shakers. They're the ones that contribute to campaigns. Speaker 2: The Fed undertook these policies as an emergency measure to address what they themselves had all created. Speaker 3: 02/2008 brought a new crisis and the Federal Reserve started using new tools and programs it had not used before. Speaker 4: They made it seem like this is a crisis that's affecting all of us. Speaker 5: So now instead of the Fed targeting a particular federal funds rate or a range of federal funds rates, now the Fed is changing the supply of reserves in the system through open market operations. Speaker 4: And so they came up with all these different ways of injecting new money into the system. Speaker 0: Using partially some tax dollars and some just money printing by the Fed to give all these big banks billions of dollars. Speaker 6: And they started buying, but even more radical than that was they started buying mortgages. They bought the Fed bought mortgages in the form of mortgage backed securities. Speaker 5: They started buying mortgage backed securities as opposed to just government debt. They were intervening in bailing out specific corporations. So it's not surprising Speaker 2: that we saw a big run up. The price went up regardless of the value of the company or the value of the bond or the value of the land or the value of the real estate. Speaker 4: So that was a change where they were brazen about what they were doing, open about picking the winners. They're receiving the new money first, and they're receiving it at lower interest rates than they would have been. Speaker 2: And the Fed, since that time, has been operating with just one new policy, one surprise policy after another. Speaker 3: The Fed's new policies took it deep into previously untouched areas of the economy. This resulted in an everything bubble of inflation where prices for a wide range of assets and goods and services were constantly increasing. Speaker 4: So there's nothing wrong with prices in general going up or down. It's just that when the government is in control of of the money supply, it can use that up and down of prices to benefit certain groups. Speaker 5: In an inflationary environment, your incentives are to consume. Your incentives are to to unload the money as soon as you get it, and go buy things. Any amounts of money that you've accumulated that's not invested or used to buy consumption goods is gonna be losing value in this permanent inflation that we have. Speaker 6: And both the bubble and the problems are really the result of this unprecedented and, in my view, unwise mortgage financing effort of the Fed of making itself into a giant savings and loan. Speaker 5: The way that regular consumers become increasingly indebted, they've got to get those loans from somewhere. And so Wall Street definitely gains as a result of the Fed's money printing. Speaker 0: These bailouts socialize the losses. So they create a system with the banks of the profits are mine, the losses are on you, the taxpayer, and that's horribly destructive of the whole free market system. Speaker 5: So each crisis that they cause gives them a chance to to grow even more. And with each crisis, the Fed is is gaining more and more power. And as they gain more power, they intervene more and create even bigger crises. Speaker 3: As if that wasn't enough, in 2020, the World Health Organization announced a pandemic. Speaker 6: We had a virus go around the world, and much to everybody's surprise, it caused a financial collapse. Speaker 2: Everybody's attention moved completely away from what was going on in the marketplace and in the economy, and everybody was focused solely on the virus and the shutdowns and what was happening to businesses and jobs and the economy. Speaker 4: For a long time, during the lockdown, people didn't really spend that money or they spent it on Amazon and not on brick and mortar shops, and that forced prices up tremendously. Speaker 2: And so it's quite natural that most people associate the recession that we went through at that time with the virus rather than with the Fed. Speaker 3: The government's message was that the global economy was collapsing due to COVID, and the Fed responded with its inflationary tools. We were Speaker 2: headed downhill when COVID hit. And then when COVID hit, well, the government decided to spend trillions of dollars to keep the economy going. And the Fed accommodated that by basically printing trillions of dollars. Speaker 1: So the Fed is a the Fed bought everything that wasn't nailed down and did took a hammer and stripped some of those nails away, it was an all purpose, all front bailout. Speaker 6: But when the crisis was over, they didn't stop. They went right on. Speaker 5: And so now they're lending indirectly to specific companies, and it's it really is a systemization of the, too big to fail concept. Permanently. It's a great example of the way that the Fed has ballooned in power. Speaker 6: But the misconception is that the Fed somehow knows the economic future, the financial future, and therefore knows how to manipulate it through manipulating interest rates, through manipulating supply of money, through buying, as they have bought trillions of dollars of bonds and mortgages. Speaker 3: The Fed's buying had far reaching ramifications for the financial world, but did they consider who else would be affected? Speaker 1: The free market economies are, peopled by human beings. Speaker 5: When you see higher prices at the grocery store, when you see higher energy bills, when when you see higher prices anywhere, you should be thinking about how that loss of your purchasing power is the government's gain. Speaker 0: And so the the Fed induces people to consume now, live for the present, and not worry about the future. Speaker 4: The step by step process by which money spreads throughout the economy and impoverishes the people who get the money late or those people who are retired and on on fixed incomes and never get the new money. Speaker 5: One group that would certainly be harmed would be younger generations. Speaker 4: The people on Main Street didn't get it. They didn't benefit. In fact, they were hurt. Speaker 2: Young people, Gen Z, etcetera, what they're facing is not just a Fed that can inflate the money supply out of thin air and evaporate anything that they've been able to accumulate. Speaker 4: When the Fed increases the money supply, especially in the amounts and the ways that it did so during COVID, that it really redistributes wealth. And it redistributes wealth away from the middle class, away from Main Street towards Wall Street and Silicon Valley. Speaker 3: When wealth shifts this much, Speaker 2: there was always chaos. Everything just sort of broke at the end of COVID. Speaker 8: The big picture there is the monetary system facilitates this continued buildup of the combination of corporations, corporatism, and the government. Speaker 5: What this means is that there's one group who will definitely benefit by acquiring acquiring all of this capital, whereas another group is they always have the the short end of the stick. So you you can definitely see that there are some sectors that are closer to the beginning of this chain of of spending. At the very front is the government. Speaker 0: And then the Fed gets rewarded in in various ways after that. Because the way the Fed finances its own salaries is when it when it buys bonds, it prints up the money, free money, counterfeit money, buys bonds with it. And so that money goes into the banking system. That's how the money supply increases. But in terms Speaker 5: of like, who's first, who's second, who's third, that's not something that we can pinpoint exactly. But we can definitely say that there is a wealth transfer. There are benefits to being at the beginning, and there are costs to being at the end. Speaker 6: Think of the government together as being both the treasury and the Fed. One, so as the Fed loses money and just borrows more money to finance its losses, it's just running up the debt and it's a cost to the taxpayers. Speaker 5: We should definitely be more upset about the institutionalized inflation, the fact that inflation is a permanent feature of our economy. Speaker 3: Using inflation to enrich some while impoverishing others seems to have become the Fed's ultimate weapon. Speaker 1: People feel that inflation, which is a systematic depreciation of the currency. But, to put that in context, the Fed actually intends to cheapen the value of your money. Speaker 0: That's why the politicians like it. And also the Fed they use the Fed as a whipping boy. When things go bad, when the rebel bursts, they call in the chairman of the Fed and they lambast the Fed chairman and and his associates there and and shift the blame to to them. So what what it means Speaker 5: is that we've got this Leviathan central bank. We've got this bank that has taken on huge powers and is always shifting. One implication of that is that it makes it really difficult to predict what's gonna happen because it means that you have to not only forecast the market, but you have to forecast what the Fed is going to do and also how the market will respond to the Fed. Speaker 1: And it's like a mood board, you know. They'll say we expect the inflation rate to be thus. We expect growth to be the following. And it's always wrong because the future is a closed book. Speaker 3: Now it seems like the future of money is ramping up toward a Fed controlled digital currency. Is a central bank a digital currency with its value fixed by the Fed a good thing or a threat? Speaker 5: The Federal Reserve as it exists today has a ton of power, and it would just be magnified tenfold, a hundredfold with a central bank digital currency. Speaker 4: It posed a large threat to American citizens because then they can program these things so that they can neutralize them if you were trying to buy goods that the government doesn't want you to spend money on. Speaker 5: It it means that they could have programs in it. You can buy certain things, but not other things. Speaker 1: A digital currency would be so helpful to the Fed. If they don't like the way you're spending money because they'll see you spend it, that would be the Fed's window into your life. Speaker 5: So if perspective is that in a crisis we need to stimulate spending, we will tax you a certain amount at the end of this time period if you haven't spent your money. So what I think they're doing is they're priming the pump. They're trying to talk about the pros and the cons of the central bank digital currency idea. And I think the idea is for them to roll it out during the middle of some crisis in the future. And people will think back and they'll say, oh yeah, this is fine. Speaker 1: The Feds own digital currency, like Bitcoin without the fund. Speaker 3: With so many ways of manipulating the money supply and financial sector, the Federal Reserve now has far more power than ever before. Speaker 1: So the Fed has virtually nationalized the financial system. Speaker 6: Who approved that? How did that get made formal? The answer is they just said it themselves. Speaker 5: That way the whole system is is sort of a cartel. The whole system is is working together. Speaker 0: It's all kinda like the scene at the end of the movie, The Wizard of Oz, they where the the great wizard is finally there and and everybody's in awe. And then all of a sudden, the curtain is pulled back by the dog, and and you and you see the phoniness of the whole thing. Speaker 3: So the real question is, is the Fed really the fireman or the arsonist? Speaker 2: They come in and say, well, we'll cut interest rates. You know, we'll bail out the banks. We'll, you know, bail out the stock market. We'll bail out foreigners. We'll do all of this. When in effect, they're the arsonists that started the fire to begin with. Speaker 4: It sets the fire by starting off printing new money and injecting it into the economy to drive prices up. Then when it sees prices rising, the Fed itself jumps in and claims that it's trying to balance unemployment and inflation, when in fact it's really not the firemen that's protecting them from the flames of inflation. Speaker 0: And so for hundreds and hundreds of years, people have understood the danger of government control of money. So it makes it uncertain even for an individual when whenever the government creates price inflation and and does that to our money. Speaker 8: What has happened, the leaders in this country, the people who control the financial system and the financial system and the whole works, they work on a basis of immorality. Speaker 4: But it is the arsonist and it continues to be the arsonist in the guise of Speaker 3: a fireman. It's a crazed fireman. The financial world under the Fed seems to have evolved into madness. Is it time for a new approach? Speaker 8: So we live in very, very dangerous times, mainly because we've allowed the Fed to control the world monetary system. And just because you have debt and turn it into money, that does not mean real wealth. Speaker 6: And while they're guessing, they create great inflations and booms and busts. Speaker 3: Inflation, booms and busts. The results of excessive government and the ramifications of these cycles of instability were identified by an influential economist in 1912. Speaker 5: So the boom bust cycle, a term that we use to refer to Austrian business cycle theory, and it was developed by Ludwig von Mises in his book, The Theory of Money and Credit. Speaker 4: Mises was one of the first economists to fully explain that when money is introduced into the economy, prices don't all go up at once, and and and people's incomes don't go all up at once. Speaker 2: So if you have an entity working behind the scenes manipulating the value of that monetary unit, then that's gonna cause, that's naturally gonna cause some kind of trouble. Speaker 5: Basically what it says is that in a unhampered market economy, this works fantastically. So people decide to save and people decide to consume and the balance of that interaction gives us a market interest rate and it gives entrepreneurs good information on what lines of production to pursue. Speaker 4: Austrian business cycle theory doesn't predict the timing. Some people say that's a flaw, but it's not really a flaw because people have free will and they can spend their money or not spend their money as they see fit. Speaker 2: Austrian economists following Mises have always placed a very high priority on money because it's the one thing we all have in common. We all use money. And he realized that central banks in manipulating money and manipulating credit induced this artificial boom. And the consequence of that is the economic bust or what we call now the recession. Murray Rothbard expanded on Mises' Austrian School economics. In his works, he advanced the idea of limiting government intervention and abolishing fractional reserve banking. The importance that Austrian economics brings to the general economic table is that we think money is very, very important and the natural stability of the monetary unit is very important for everyone in society. Speaker 0: Murray Rothbard, who was one of the cofounders really of the Mises Institute here, once said that, you know, if government got in the business of making shoes early on, people would be saying, well, who would make shoes? The government has always made shoes. And the the same thing goes for the Fed. A lot of people think, well, yeah, the Fed has always been in control of the money supply, but it hasn't. Speaker 4: Rothbard even more pointed out that an increase in the money supply does not benefit society. It benefits some at the expense of others. Speaker 5: Whenever you're in control of the printing press, whenever you're in control of how much money there is, you're going to create winners and losers. Speaker 4: There is no social benefit from increasing the money supply. Any money supply is sufficient to allow people to trade for all the goods and services they want to, but just at a lower price. Speaker 3: Will government leaders ever do what it takes to stop the inflation? Speaker 4: Inflation is what you see on an everyday basis when you go to the supermarket, when you stop at the gas station, it's all around you. Speaker 8: The real evil tax is the inflation tax because it hits the middle class and the poor. Speaker 2: When I look out there, I see a lot of government debt, a lot of private debt, and a lot of things working against the free market economy, working against free trade, an inability and almost an unwillingness on the part of the players in the system to seek out peaceful, cooperative solutions to emerging problems and rather to use those emerging problems to their politic their own political benefit. Speaker 3: What should we do with the Fed? The country's political central bank. Speaker 0: We went for a long time without without a central bank. And, you know, think about it. Let's put all the money in the hands of politicians in a secret organization that is never allowed to be audited. Speaker 8: The government's a mess. The fan's a mess. Speaker 5: We should get back to a system in which money is out of the hands of government. Speaker 0: It's a political game. That's why whenever a congressperson like Ron Paul would argue for auditing the Fed, the entire banking industry would rally around and send millions to both political parties in Washington to kill it, to kill the bill, to audit the Fed. Speaker 8: No. We we don't need a Fed. Speaker 5: And what that would mean is we would get the money supply that the the market can bear and the market would produce. If you Speaker 8: mess around with interest rates, people do dumb things. They buy too much stuff or build too many buildings or cars, and that's through the creation of the bubble, and that always has to has to be corrected. Speaker 4: A life without a Fed is constant growth and slowly falling prices, which benefits the entire population, including people on fixed incomes, who are really hurt by inflation. Take away the power of the Fed to ever buy anything again, because that's how they print new money, by buying assets in the market. Speaker 2: We can end the Fed's power and activities today. We can take them completely out of interest rate setting policies. We can take them completely out of the money creation process today. Speaker 6: And you, Fed, you're not the decision maker here. You shall not drown mankind in a flood of paper money. Speaker 0: If Mises were here today, I think he would be full on in support of ending the Fed altogether. Speaker 1: If the Fed ended and with it ended the pure paper dollar, it would be left to all of us politically and individually to evolve a new system. Speaker 6: What kind of money would the people like imposed on them? Well, how about sound money? Speaker 4: People should be able to write contracts in terms of monies, gold, silver, foreign currencies, that that they voluntarily agree upon. Speaker 6: So you can view this as very closely intertwined with the freedom and independence and responsibility of the citizens having a sound money on one side versus a perpetually inflating currency which favors the ever expanding power and spending by deficit, financed by inflation, of the government. So this is really a profoundly important political and constitutional question. Speaker 4: I think these are steps back to the gold standard or a commodity money standard. Speaker 1: The gold standard, was, was a constraint. It was the marker of the government's commitment expressed or implicit to honor the integrity of the currency. Now I say integrity. Integrity is a moralistic work, but money is work, and work is heartbeats, and heartbeats are finite. Speaker 8: You have to take a life risking surgery to get your cancer out of your belly, and that's the only thing that we can do. Economically, you just get rid of the Fed if you want to have sound money and a healthy economy. That doesn't sound so bad.

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

Funniest people are those who think the '20 crash was caused by a virus. The banking system was already collapsing Sep '19 forcing the Fed to start REPO interventions like '08. The system only collapsed when the Fed pulled REPO away 2023 is the same game plan with BTFP & OCE 🤫

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

The Fed admits guilt of causing the 2020 crisis by pulling the Emergency Repo rug at exactly the worst possible time, despite the banking system being on life support since Sep 2019 The Repo rug was pulled right after Powell attended the Bezos party 🤫 https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/what-happened-in-money-markets-in-september-2019-20200227.html

What Happened in Money Markets in September 2019? The Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Washington DC. federalreserve.gov
Saved - August 16, 2025 at 12:40 AM

@Malone_Wealth - Kevin Malone

BREAKING NEWS: Federal Reserve Reverse Repo reaches its lowest level in more than four years. Do you know what happens next? https://t.co/EQrDp49xx3

View Full Interactive Feed