TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 2:46 AM

@DaneUndivided - Dane County Undivided

Former chancellor of University of Wisconsin, Rebecca Blank, got a fast progressing cancer in 2022 just after she was hired by #Northwestern University, so she never started that post & died in February 2023. @UWMadison mandated the #mRNA #CovidVaccine https://tmj4.com/news/local-news/former-uw-madison-chancellor-dies-of-cancer

Former UW-Madison chancellor dies of cancer Former University of Wisconsin-Madison chancellor Rebecca Blank died of cancer on Friday, according to a website created by the school. tmj4.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Oncologist: Cancers Are 'Growing Out of Control' In COVID-VACClNATED Individuals Aggressive and rapidly-growing "turbo cancers" are affecting young people unlike anything Dr. @MakisMD has seen in his career. "High school kids are coming down with these cancers. The turbo…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Turbocancers are affecting pregnant women, young kids, and high school students, causing lymphomas, brain cancers, breast cancers, colon cancers, and lung cancers. Leukemias in COVID vaccinated individuals can be fatal within days or even hours. Tragic cases of young kids feeling unwell, going to the emergency room, being diagnosed with leukemia, and dying shortly after have been reported. Only Professor Day Glitch from St. George's University in London is raising the alarm, noting that stable cancer patients experienced uncontrollable cancer growth after taking a COVID booster shot. Doctors who speak up about these issues are being persecuted for causing vaccine hesitancy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. These turbocancers, they're happening in pregnant women. They're happening in young kids, as I said, as young as 12 years old. But but high school kids are coming down with these cancers. The turbocancers, I'm seeing lymphomas, I'm seeing brain cancers, stage 4 brain cancers and then breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers. The leukemias that are showing up in the COVID vaccinated individuals, they can kill in a matter of days or even hours. I've reported several cases where young kids 13 years old, 16 years old, they feel unwell, they go to emergency, and The doctors discover that they have leukemia and then they die a few hours later. These are tragic stories and oncologists are are they're not talking about it. You know, there's only a professor Day Glitch in, St. George's University in London, United Kingdom Yeah. Who's sounding the alarm. And he has seen His patients, who were stable, stable cancer patients who took a COVID booster shot and suddenly, you know, their cancer is growing out of control And so he's sounding in the alarm. But, you know, doctors are being persecuted for speaking up and for causing vaccine hesitancy.
Saved - October 2, 2023 at 8:02 AM

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

The vaccinated are more likely to have disease and death compared to the unvaccinated confirms 17,000 Scientists and Physicians. Punish every single person who willingly lied to you and who forced you to be injected with a toxic poison.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE LIES: 17,000 Scientists and Physicians confirm that Governments around the world along with Corporations willfully and deliberately lied to humanity about the Covid vaccines. They must be charged with fraud, wrongful advertising and mass negligent homicide.…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the genetic COVID-19 injections are more harmful than beneficial, especially for young and healthy individuals. They argue that the vaccines do not reduce infection rates and can actually increase the risk of infection, disease, and death. The speaker also highlights potential damage to various organs and the immune system. Another speaker questions the testing of the Pfizer COVID vaccine and demands data on its effectiveness. There are concerns about the vaccines causing harm to women of reproductive age and unborn babies. The transcript includes accusations of fraud and illegal advertising, with calls for criminal charges against vaccine manufacturers and government entities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We must acknowledge that the genetic COVID nineteen genetic injections cause far more harm than good and provide zero benefit relative to risk for the young and healthy. They do not reduce COVID nineteen infection, which is treatable and not terminal. Furthermore, the most recent data demonstrates that you are more likely to become infected or have disease or even death if you've been vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated people. This is shocking to hear, but it is what the data are showing us. The data now show that these experimental gene therapy treatments can damage your children as well as yourself. It can damage your heart, your brain, your reproductive tissue, and your lungs. This can include permanent damage and disablement of your immune system. Speaker 1: Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine Tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. If not, please Clearly, if yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want straight answer, yes or no, and I'm looking forward to it. Speaker 2: Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanization before, it's entered the market? No. These, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk. Speaker 3: I really do believe that the federal government is captured As captured by corporate interests, the entire US population as well as the world has to understand they can no longer take these COVID vaccines. These are, they are toxic and lethal to an end ineffective that they have completely failed. They can only be viewed It is harmful and they need to Speaker 4: be stopped. And does it damage the brain? You bet it does. Is it damage to the heart? Yes. The liver? Yes. The bone marrow? Yes. It causes all sorts The harm in the human body. We should have stopped this before it ever started. Speaker 5: It's a misinformation from the CDC, the FDA, the American Board of The American college of a GYN, the society of the Patients, it is causing a lot of death and injury in my women of reproductive age, my pregnant women, and my pre Born babies and it's gotta stop and it's gotta stop now. Speaker 4: And for the vaccines broadly, we have no idea Yeah. What's gonna happen long term now that they're in the body? Studies suggest that the vaccines and the spike protein that's produced from them never Speaker 5: The the first and most important thing, don't take any more vaccines. Don't take any more boosters. Do not take any More of these dangerous experimental therapies. Speaker 6: Dear colleagues And supporters, we declare that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen and AstraZeneca And their enablers willfully withheld and admitted crucial safety and effectiveness information From patients and physicians and should be immediately indicted for fraud. We know that shortly after administration of these products, Thousands of people have died. And although correlation isn't causation, reasonable criteria have been applied To examine the relationship between injections and the events and is absolutely clear cut that these are the cause of death. Mechanistically, the design of these products was knowingly deficient in a number of ways. First, They caused the expression in the human body of toxic virus spike protein. Unlike what They told us that it would stay in the injection site. They distribute widely around the body. There was no built in limit to the amount of toxic spike Protein that can be made or for how long it is made. That's the cause of the toxicity. Turning to the clinical trials, there There is evidence of questionable practices all around. For example, several of the studies were clearly unblinded while they were ongoing Contrary to best practice and also in a number of cases, subjects were removed from the database prior to statistical analysis In a way that is suggestive of fraud. We were given blanket assurances time and again by all of the companies about benign safety profile of their products. Even as the products rolled out in the earliest weeks, they must have known this Was not true. To add insult to injury, it appears that these products provide little Well, no protection from the virus that they sought to protect us from. Speaker 7: Two questions get asked when people have hesitancy or reluctance to get vaccinated. Did you go too quickly is the first. The answer to that is the speed was a reflection of extraordinary scientific Advances and did not compromise safety nor did it compromise scientific integrity. The next Question is, okay, but what about the fact, is it really safe and is it really effective? Or is this Something the government is trying to put over on us. Is this something the companies want to take advantage of? Well, Well, let's take a look at what's happened over the past few months. Speaker 4: I'm going to be very clear about this and I've recently just testified in the US Senate December 7, 2022. The vaccine is killing people and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality For, a medicinal product causing death, our CDC as of December 23, 2022 has over 1000 Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine. Yeah. And that's probably a gross under report. Speaker 8: We don't know if these vaccines will work. We don't know if they'll work to avoid deaths. We don't know if they'll work to avoid transmission. That's why we're working on so many 1st generation vaccines. Speaker 2: How do we know if these vaccines are working? Speaker 8: You'd like it to be very safe In all the populations, that you indicated for no side effects and then you'd like it to avoid the individuals who gets the vaccine getting sick. Speaker 4: So where are the criminal charges going to, first come? I think the easy ones to go after are illegal advertising. The vaccines have been advertised by the CDC, The NIH, FDA, DHS, and the vaccine companies as safe and effective. Americans know they can't do that. The vaccines have to be presented with risks and benefits Including fatal myocarditis, blood clots, and neurologic damage. We haven't seen that on TV. That violates the Lanvin Act, the Truth in Advertising Act, US Drug and Cosmetic That that is an easy conviction for wrongful advertising of all those entities. That means government entities being called For malfeasance or wrongdoing. And then beyond that, the big charges are fraud. America has been defrauded in so many aspects of pandemic response.
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 3:13 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Dr. Rashid Buttar was one of the few doctors in the world that stood with humanity and spoke up against the #Covid #Vaccine - Listen to this interview he did with CNN, right before he DIED https://t.co/FBUWq7E4jX

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss Dr. Fauci's alleged involvement in a plot to kill millions of people. Speaker 1 suggests that Dr. Fauci is not innocent and is aware of his actions, but does not have specific information about his involvement. Speaker 2 mentions that Dr. Buttar, known for spreading COVID disinformation, has a large following and promotes conspiracy theories about COVID being a planned operation to depopulate the earth. Speaker 1 also claims that more people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID itself, which Speaker 2 refutes. Speaker 1 compares Dr. Fauci to Hitler, while Speaker 2 emphasizes the importance of vaccines and criticizes Dr. Buttar's false information. The video concludes with Speaker 1 expressing concerns about the vaccine's safety and the potential for a mass genocide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You think doctor Fauci is involved in some kind of plot to kill millions of people? I just wanna make sure I understand this. Speaker 1: Again, Drew, I'm a reasonable You're asking me what I think, and I said it could be this. But I can tell you that doctor Fauci is not an innocent bystander. He's very well aware of what he's doing. Person, and the extent of it in his involvement, I don't know. I'm not privy to that information. Speaker 2: As atrocious as doctor Pottar's fake conclusions and conspiracy theories are, He is just one of the doctors spreading dangerous COVID disinformation to millions of people across social media according to the Center For Countering Digital Hate. Per Duroshad Buttar, at one time, had more than a 1000000 followers and is considered one of the top spreaders of disinformation about COVID nineteen. Speaker 1: Person. More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID. Speaker 2: That is not true. Neither is his tweet that the Red Cross accept blood from people who have had the COVID nineteen vaccine. He posted most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025, per But his biggest whopper is the overarching conspiracy theory that COVID was a planned operation, which was We motivate as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. Speaker 0: You believe the pandemic was planned? I do. Okay. But you don't know by that? Speaker 1: Person. I have no idea. Speaker 0: And you don't know why? Speaker 1: Well, I suspect that there's the research that's coming now that would indicate that it's probably something to reduce the population or or minimize reproduction rates. Speaker 2: It would be laughable if it wasn't so dangerous. Person. Bhutar compares COVID and the vaccine to World War 2 and doctor Anthony Fauci to Adolf Hitler. Speaker 1: Person. Fucci is a criminal. You talk about Hitler. Okay. Well Speaker 0: Whoever the doctor Fauci is in your mind, person. He is a government bureaucrat, and you are comparing him to Hitler. Well, I mean the Nazis Speaker 1: I I am. Speaker 0: Who killed 6,000,000 Jews. Speaker 1: I I think this is that this number is going to be higher. Speaker 3: Let's be absolutely clear. Lives cost lives in a pandemic. Person. If you're encouraging people not to vaccinate, you will cause people to lose their lives. Speaker 2: Qatar per is encouraging people to distrust life saving vaccines. And like other disinformers, he is using false, twisted information and Proven conspiracies to do it. Speaker 0: Do you think the COVID vaccine works? Speaker 1: I think that the COVID vaccine is very effective at what it was designed for perhaps, but it's not person preventing death. Certainly Speaker 0: not. It's not preventing death. Speaker 2: No. Even faced with indisputable facts, person. Doubles down on his belief that life saving vaccines are more dangerous than the virus itself. Speaker 1: People don't die from COVID. You've already seen the data. So why are we getting a vaccine that causes more deaths than the problem itself? Speaker 0: 6,340,000,000 doses person. Of this vaccine had been given. If you're right, people could drop in bed all around this world. Speaker 1: It's not orchestrated to do that. Each vaccine has been geared up so you can look at the ingredients of the vaccines themselves. It's all been published. Speaker 0: Complete the sentence. Each vaccine has been geared up for what? Person. But there's a time Speaker 1: Each vaccine is designed it appears to be different. I don't know the details because I'm not a vaccine developer. Scientific corruption. Speaker 2: Because of his disinformation, Qatar has been removed from Facebook Instagram, but he's still going strong on Twitter, Telegram, and his own website all filled with falsehoods. Speaker 0: On September 5th, If you retweeted a photo of AstraZeneca packaging that seems to indicate the vaccine was made in 2018, that picture that you retweeted was a doctored photo. It was fake. Speaker 1: Perhaps it was fake, but Speaker 0: why would you do that? Speaker 1: So let me ask you something you're saying it's not reasonable to question the same agencies that have resulted in Numerous deaths, I e d s It's Speaker 0: reasonable to ask questions. What I don't understand is how you get from your asking questions to your belief. You had 1,200,000 followers at 1 point. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: They got false information from you. Not not correct or challenging Medical information. They got a doctor photo. Speaker 1: If I sent a tweet out of a picture that was doctored and I didn't know about it, I'm not perfect. Maybe I did make mistake, but I cannot make mistakes on the numbers. Speaker 2: The very latest vaccine study show they remain 90% effective in preventing hospitalization person. And death, Qatar tells his followers, it is the vaccine that is the danger. Speaker 1: We already see thousands of people die. This delta variant is all vaccine danger. I mean, the the CDC's own data is showing that now. Speaker 0: That's just not true. Speaker 1: I don't want to be part of this mass person. Genocide that I see happening. And I think that what's going on right now will be remembered as a worst time in history compared to Speaker 0: World War 2 happened. I just wanna be straight with you. I think you're crazy. Speaker 2: Person. Before COVID, North Carolina's board of medicine recommended
Saved - January 8, 2024 at 3:41 AM

@Paul_RevereJr - 𝕏 ƤΔʊ𝐋 ЯΞVΞЯΞ 𝕏𓂀

A small compilation of those in HOLLYWOOD and the MEDICAL FIELD that SHILLED the VAX, that once THEY HAD a SCARE or DEATH close to them, did a COMPLETE 180⁰! I think it's great that they spoke up. However, should they BEAR SOME RESPONSIBILITY for the LIVES THEY RUINED? https://t.co/ble0i2tIRO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden's successful vaccination campaign is attributed to expanding the list of authorized vaccine providers. However, one person claims to have contracted COVID-19 after receiving the vaccine, suggesting a connection. Another emphasizes the importance of promoting vaccines as a means to return to normal life. A petition is announced to investigate potential wrongdoing in Florida. Concerns are raised about the efficacy of vaccines and their adverse effects. Despite this, the vaccine rollout in the country is praised. Vaccine hesitancy is attributed to false information on social media, while vaccines are deemed safe compared to other drugs. A comparison is made between the risks of adverse events from the vaccine and hospitalization due to COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden's kinda kicking ass. 97,000,000 vaccines have gone 2,000,000 a day now. To but one reason why they're doing so well with that is they expanded the list of who can give, shots. I went to my vet. Oh, it's fine. It's a little different. He gave me this shot, and he put a cone on my neck. I I I don't know. I didn't get COVID the whole 14 months. Then as soon as I got the vaccine, like, a month later, I got COVID. I think they're connected. And when you get the vaccine, it it by its design, it lowered my immune system. Speaker 1: The messaging should be, Get a vaccine because it's good for you to do it. It works. You're not gonna have to be, doing anything, like, Abnormal. You can live your life. I mean, that has gotta be what the message is. I'm announcing a petition with the Supreme Court of Florida To impanel a statewide grand jury to investigate any and all wrongdoing in Florida Speaker 3: the world or certainly change the world of the pandemic. And then and and through that, the world is going to be massively significant as well as we'll claims of efficacy were vastly, vastly overstated. And as we'll see, to try this is in fact the case. You could argue it was very vastly overstated. Speaker 2: But Speaker 1: try I didn't Speaker 0: wanna jinx Speaker 2: the vaccine, so I'm not gonna talk about that yet. Speaker 3: You said Speaker 2: because I'm just fearful something's gonna happen. I wanna get it so badly. Set up, though, to get I have an appointment to get the vaccine tomorrow. It is the Pfizer vaccine, but I I can't care less whether it's Moderna or Pfizer. Just give it to me. Yeah. Just give it to me. And I had a horrible reaction to the vaccine. I have a son that had Terrible reaction to it, and I'm really very, very concerned. Making a healthy person sick because of something, an intervention we do as physicians, Speaker 0: do Speaker 2: no harm is completely violated by the COVID vaccine. We are making a healthy person sick. Speaker 4: Fortunately, for this country, The procurement and rollout of the vaccine has been such an excellent job compared to our competitor economy. Speaker 5: It's the vaccines that they're causing excess deaths in New Zealand just like it's the vaccines causing excess deaths in the UK and elsewhere. So can we please have a statement now from the government Suspending these, experimental mRNA vaccines before any more death and harm It's done to our population. Thank you. Speaker 6: We need to understand where this vaccine hesitancy is coming from. There is some, irrational clearly irrational reasoning behind why people don't wanna take the vaccine, which is based upon very blatant False information that's circulating on social media. When you look at all of the drugs out there that people are taking, vaccines by far are the safest. Speaker 7: In the trials that led to the approval by the regulators. You are more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, life changing event, than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. So what that means is it's highly likely
Saved - March 17, 2024 at 1:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A Navy medic, Lt. Ted Macie, has gone public with data from a Pentagon medical database showing a spike in myocarditis and other health issues among vaccinated military personnel. The Department of Defense tried to blame the events on the Covid virus itself, but with high vaccination rates, it suggests the vaccine was ineffective. Independent scientists argue that the vaccine caused more harm than the virus. Lt. Macie now faces potential charges after meeting with higher-ups. #DOD #Corruption

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Breaking: US Navy Medic Shut Down for Releasing unclassified DOD Data Showing a 937% Increase in Heart Failure Among Vaccinated US Military Personnel A service member who earlier this year blew the whistle and disclosed data from a Pentagon medical database showing a spike in the rate of myocarditis in the military in 2021, after the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, is going public. The whistleblower is active-duty Navy Medical Service Corps officer Lt. Ted Macie. He has also revealed new data showing a substantial rise in accidents, assaults, self-harm, and suicide attempts in the military in 2021, compared to the average from 2016 to 2021. That the deaths and health injuries are anything but rare is evident from the report by a US Navy medic that Department of Defense data show that US Navy pilots have suffered a: 937% increase in heart failure 152% increase in cardiomyopathy 69% increase in ischemic heart disease 36% increase in hypertensive disease 36% increase in hypertensive disease 63% increase in other forms of heart disease Ludwig von MisesBest Price: $2.46Buy New $8.54(as of 06:40 UTC - Details)The corrupt US Department of Defense, a ramp for the excess profits of the armaments industry, tried to blame the events on the Covid virus itself. However, “according to information published by the US Army, 97% of active-duty U.S. troops are fully vaccinated, 90% of Army National Guard members are fully vaccinated, and 91% of U.S. Army Reserve members are fully vaccinated.” So, if the “vaccine” did not cause the deaths and health injuries, and the virus was responsible, obviously the “vaccine” was totally ineffective in protecting against the virus. In actual fact, according to independent medical scientists, the “vaccine” not only did not protect but caused more deaths and worst health injuries than the virus itself. As the US Navy medic now suffers. Lt. Ted Macie met with the female Chief of Naval Operations and her aide, and afterward found that he was blocked from access to his computer. Charges are likely pending against him. #DOD #Corruption https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/03/paul-craig-roberts/us-navy-medic-shut-down-for-releasing-unclassified-dod-data-showing-a-937-increase-in-heart-failure-among-vaccinated-us-military-personnel/

US Navy Medic Shut Down for Releasing unclassified DOD Data Showing a 937% Increase in Heart Failure Among Vaccinated US Military Personnel - LewRockwell Yesterday I provided examples of how the establishment, which can only lie, is trying to narrative manage the no longer deniable evidence that the Covid vax is deadly and harmful to health. See here. One of the narrative management tricks is to admit the adverse effects of the “vaccine” but to sweep them under the rug as “rare.” If the dangers of the “vaccine” were rare, Big Pharma would not have its shills at work trying to discredit or dismantle the vaccine adverse events reporting system. Facts the Historians L... John S. Tilley Best Price: $5.00 Buy New $4.87 (as … Continue reading → lewrockwell.com
Saved - April 14, 2024 at 1:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts question whether certain individuals are guilty of crimes against humanity. They highlight concerns about the treatment of the unvaccinated and the pressure to take an experimental mRNA injection without long-term safety data.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Are these people guilty of crimes against humanity? 🤬 Never forget the inexcusable way the unvaccinated were treated for over two years, in an attempt to coerce them into surrendering their bodily autonomy and taking an experimental mRNA injection, for which no long-term safety data existed. Credit: @GrabienMedia

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the responsibility of the unvaccinated, urging them to get vaccinated for the greater good. It criticizes their choices, suggesting they should be shamed and taxed. The speakers express frustration with those who spread misinformation and refuse vaccines, highlighting the strain on healthcare systems. The vaccinated are portrayed as victims of the unvaccinated's actions, with calls for stricter measures to address the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story. Speaker 1: The only people that you can blame the only people you can blame this isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed by the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: It's time for the start blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks. Speaker 1: Anyone you came into contact with will blame you as will the rest of us who've done the right thing by getting vaccinated. Speaker 3: Because, frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. I think Speaker 4: it's time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat. Speaker 0: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value. You're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the the sins of the Speaker 3: people are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well. Speaker 5: The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country saying, we don't care. We're living free and so forth. Speaker 4: We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. Speaker 6: The unvaccinated, a group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are Speaker 7: starting to get pissed off. The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or angry. Speaker 4: This is not about freedom or personal choice. Well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom. Speaker 0: The other day, Howard Stern weighed in with a much different approach. Take a look. Speaker 8: Mhmm. When are we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this Speaker 9: country and just say, you now it's mandatory to get vaccinated? Speaker 8: Freedom. Speaker 0: You're treading on our freedom, and you're making other people say that, really, you're killing other people. The anti vaxxers, they seem to have a thing for death and home remedies. Speaker 7: The anti maskers turned anti vaxxers are not just putting their own lives at risk. If that was the key issue, we could just say that we can watch them compete to win place their show in the Darwin Awards. Speaker 1: We have to start doing things for the greater good of society and not for idiots who think that they can do their own research. And don't get me started on the lunatics who won't take any of the COVID vaccines. Speaker 2: Life is too short to be an ass. Life is way too short to be ignorant of the promise of something that is helping people worldwide. Speaker 1: Maybe you're doing it because, you're you're disconnected or disorganized. Maybe you have some sympathetic psychological reasons, but maybe you're just being antisocial. Oh, you can't shame them. You can't call them stupid. You can't call them silly. Yes. They are. Speaker 4: Those who are not vaccinated will end up paying the price. Speaker 7: The unvaccinated should be taxed. They should pay more for health care. Speaker 3: We need to start looking at the choice to remain unvaccinated the same as we look at driving while intoxicated. Speaker 9: We're gonna see, and I've said, almost Mhmm. 2 types of America. Speaker 10: Doctor Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU bed. And that choice doesn't seem so tough to me. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Guy who gobbled horse coo, rest in peace, wheezy. Speaker 0: Pointing back to the unvaccinated who are really creating Speaker 6: unvaccinated. And for those of you spreading misinformation, shame on you. I are the unvaccinated. And for those of you spreading misinformation, shame on you. Shame on you. I don't know how some of you sleep at night.
Saved - April 24, 2024 at 11:44 PM

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Never forget the unforgivable way the unvaccinated were treated for not wanting to take an experimental injection, for which no long-term safety data even existed. https://t.co/bSEHli3hQR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Our patience is running thin due to the refusal of the unvaccinated, leading to severe illness and death in the winter. The unvaccinated are seen as enemies propagating the outbreak, overwhelming hospitals. The pandemic is primarily among the unvaccinated, who are causing harm and overcrowding healthcare facilities. Calls for universal vaccination and consequences for those who refuse are made, highlighting the divide in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us. Speaker 1: People who are incubators for every variant to come, walking around lawfully unvaccinated, that's psychotic. Speaker 2: For the unvaccinated, you're looking at a winter of severe illness and death for yourselves, your families, and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm. Speaker 1: About this. In a world of threats and tyrants and terror, you know what our biggest enemy is in America? Our fellow Americans. Speaker 3: Because they are the ones that are propagating this outbreak. Speaker 4: I've been frustrated that there is still a percentage of the population are who are not vaccinated. I wish that he would go further to restrict the activities of the unvaccinated. Speaker 5: Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo? Rest in peace, Wheezy. Speaker 2: You're that's Speaker 0: A 25% can cause a lot of damage, and they are. Speaker 3: If you're willing to walk among us unvaccinated, you are an enemy. Speaker 4: Well, you know, it's my rights and okay. But I don't care. Pandemic of the unvaccinated. No. Speaker 0: Look. The only pandemic we have is among the unvaccinated. And that's and they're and they're killing people. Speaker 6: Freedom not to follow the facts even if your Speaker 3: freedom kills people? What kind of freedom is that? What kind of freedom do they really want? Speaker 0: We have a pandemic because of the unvaccinated, and they're slowing an enormous population. The unvaccinated overcrowd our hospitals or overrunning emergency rooms and intensive care units, leaving no room for someone with a heart attack or pancreatitis or cancer. Speaker 7: Shouldn't they have to pay more into Speaker 8: the system because they are collapsing our health system? They are the ones in the ERs. Speaker 1: Require vaccination universally. Have the military run it. If you don't wanna get vaccinated, you better be ready to prove your conscientious objector status in court. Speaker 3: It's almost like it's gonna be 2 Americas.
Saved - June 8, 2024 at 2:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a series of posts, the author criticizes an article published by the LA Times, written by @hiltzikm, defending @PeterHotez. The author accuses Hotez of inciting hatred against the unvaccinated and questions his credibility. They argue that vaccines do not prevent severe illness or death and claim that journalism has failed. The author also questions why the LA Times is giving a platform to such individuals. They suggest that Hotez's change in opinion on vaccines may be influenced by financial motives. The author concludes by expressing the need to remember and not forgive those who they believe are trying to ruin their lives.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

In his new propaganda piece, @hiltzikm whines that the pharma shill and dentist denier @PeterHotez, who compared the unvaccinated to terrorists, is facing well-deserved criticism. It’s outrageous that the @latimes published this shameful article. A THREAD 🧵 ⬇️ https://t.co/lKUIW5W4X0

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2 "It is not surprising that @hiltzikm defends Hotez, as he has incited hatred against the unvaccinated in a Goebbels-like manner. In his opinion piece (bit.ly/3nuR5et), he said that 'those who have deliberately flouted sober medical advice by refusing a vaccine known to reduce the risk of serious disease from the virus, including the risk to others, and end up in the hospital or the grave can be viewed as receiving their just deserts.' I find his attitude unworthy of a Pulitzer Prize winner, especially since current data shows that those who have not been vaccinated or were skeptical from the beginning were ultimately proven right. The 'vaccines' never prevented severe illness, hospitalization, or death. On the contrary, the more often people are 'vaccinated,' the higher the probability of an early demise. This once again shows that journalism has failed and that a dialogue on equal footing is essential for a functioning democracy. People like him, on the other hand, are the personification of the danger to peaceful coexistence. We - those who have been discriminated against by him and his peers for three years - will never forget what they have done to us in the name of 'science.' No amnesty!"

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@hiltzikm #3 The real question is why the @latimes is behaving like ‘Der Stürmer,’ giving a platform to such misanthropes and agitators, and even defending a proven liar like Hotez. This video is undeniable proof that he is not speaking the truth. https://t.co/MJse806oPa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Developing a safe and effective vaccine typically takes 10 to 25 years, with the fastest in the US being around 3 to 4 years. The timeline for COVID-19 vaccines is similar to other vaccines, with some minor differences. This should reassure those hesitant about getting vaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's usually a 10 to 25 year time frame. People forget how long it really takes to develop, an effective and safe vaccine and do all the adequate clinical testing. I think the current record for developing a vaccine from start to licensure in the United States is around 3 or 4 years. So that's the realistic time frame we have to start thinking about. When you look at the timelines of coronavirus fact this COVID 19 vaccines, it really follows the same progression as almost any other vaccine. The vaccine development cycle for COVID 19 vaccines very much goes along with what we've seen before. And there are some very variances, but but modest. And, I think that's an important story for people to know if they're concerned about taking COVID 19 vaccines.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#4 Even worse, this likely highly corrupt individual uses his connections to spew his hatred of the unvaccinated in the world's most prestigious scientific journal. In this article, he suggests that vaccine skeptics are enemies of the state and terrorists who must be fought accordingly. Why, dear @latimes, do you even bother to defend such a vile person?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#5 Last but not least, let's not forget that until April 2020, Hotez was opposing Covid vaccines. Back then, Hotez expressed his concerns about a potential vaccine for the seasonal cold virus. But how did it happen that he suddenly changed his opinion and labeled all critics as anti-science? Only his bank account knows. Those who must have bribed him are probably the same players who also bribed mainstream media outlets and journalists."

Video Transcript AI Summary
We observed potential safety issues with coronavirus vaccines similar to past respiratory virus vaccines. In the 1960s, some children had adverse reactions, even deaths, due to immune enhancement when exposed to the virus after vaccination. This led to the abandonment of the RSV vaccine program for decades. The same immune pathology was seen in laboratory animals during coronavirus vaccine development, raising concerns about safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that we're not hearing a lot about is the unique potential safety problem of coronavirus vaccines. When we started developing coronavirus vaccines and our colleagues, we noticed in laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same immune pathology that resembled what had happened 50 years earlier. So we said, Oh, my God, this is going to be problematic. We don't entirely understand the basis of it, but we recognize that it's a real problem for certain respiratory virus vaccines. This was first found in the early 1960s with the respiratory syncytial virus vaccines. Some of those kids who got the vaccine actually did worse. And I believe there were 2 deaths in the consequence of that study because what happens with certain types of respiratory virus vaccines, you get immunized. And then when you get actually exposed to the virus, you get this kind of paradoxical immune enhancement phenomenon. And we don't entirely understand the basis of it, but we recognize that it's a real problem for certain respiratory virus vaccines. That killed the RSV program for decades. Now the Gates Foundation is taking it up again. But when we started developing coronavirus vaccines and our colleagues, we noticed in laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same immune pathology that resembled what had happened 50 years earlier. So we said, oh my god, this is going to be problematic.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@hiltzikm @latimes #6 Thank you very much for reading this short thread. We must neither forget nor forgive because these people will not stop trying to ruin our lives. By the way, here’s some proof that I’m worth a follow. They fear my tweets — I must be a good guy. :) https://t.co/PRFm96ZaJ7

Saved - June 9, 2024 at 5:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
TV doctor Michael Mosley's death has raised questions about his alleged acceptance of money from vaccine manufacturers. He was known for advocating and promoting Covid vaccines. As the truth about vaccines becomes more widely discussed, those who profited from promoting them are facing public scrutiny. Some believe these individuals should face legal consequences for profiting from the suffering and loss caused by the pandemic. This situation is seen by some as a significant deception and tragedy, with historical implications.

@PhoneixReloaded - Phoneix reloaded

TV DOCTOR MICHAEL MOSLEY KILLED HIMSELF AFTER REALISING HE WAS ABOUT TO BE EXPOSED FOR TAKING MONEY FROM VACCINE MANUFACTURERS. Michael Mosley was a respected tv doctor that used his platform to promote & push covid vaccines on the public. Now that the truth about covid vaccines has become mainstream the people that profited from promoting a dangerous product to the public are being publicly humiliated and exposed. For many people these people deserve to be incarcerated as they have profited from the death and misery of others. This is one of the worst deceptions and genocides the world has ever known and those that promoted it will be remembered in history. #JAILtheWEF #ENDtheNWO

Saved - June 9, 2024 at 8:36 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Listen to Dr. Fauci explain how he made life HELL for anyone rejecting the ‘Covid Vaccine’…that he made $M’s from. This RESULTED in the murder of 20M+ globally. https://t.co/DQryz60lW0

Video Transcript AI Summary
People will be required to get vaccinated by schools, universities, and corporations like Amazon and Facebook to participate. Making it difficult for people to live without vaccination has been shown to increase compliance. Critics argue that this approach undermines personal freedoms and erodes trust in public health institutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Since people feel empowered and protected legally, you are gonna have schools, universities, and colleges. They're gonna say, you wanna come to this college, buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated. Lady, you're gonna get vaccinated. Yeah. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and and all of those others are gonna say, you wanna work for us? You get vaccinated. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated. Speaker 1: That's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American society, to self determine as we're all given god given rights. Shame on you. You inspired and created fear through mass mandates, school closures, vaccine mandates that have destroyed the American people's trust in our public health institution.
Saved - July 10, 2024 at 12:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A doctor was fired for not conforming to the mainstream view on vaccines, suggesting natural immunity is superior. The discovery of hidden Pfizer studies revealed that the vaccines spread throughout the body, causing more harm due to the presence of toxic spike proteins.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

This doctor was fired for not following the group think narrative about vaccines. Natural immunity is better than vaccines. But not in the medical industry. This is a sure sign that there’s a medical mafia. He then discovered from the Pfizer bio distribution studies that were hidden from the public, that they knew the vaccines go throughout the entire body, and do not stay in the arm. The Pfizer studies showed that the lipid nanoparticles take the mRNA strands into every part of the body. This is why the Covid shots have caused more harm than any medical treatment in history. The toxic spike protein ends up in every part of the body.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was fired after 31 years as an ER doctor for questioning the need for vaccination in those with natural immunity. Pfizer's hidden biodistribution studies reveal the vaccines spread throughout the body, causing various side effects due to the spike protein reaching all organs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was fired after 31 years as an emergency room physician with not 1 single patient complaint against me in those 31 years. I was fired for saying that somebody who had natural immunity didn't need to be vaccinated against the disease to which they were already immune. Fortunately, I still had my medical license even though I lost a significant part at least 50% of my income and I couldn't work as an emergency room doctor anymore, I still have my private practice. So when I discovered from the biodistribution studies that Pfizer had hidden, that we knew that these vaccines go around your entire body, they do not just stay in your arm. Pfizer's biodistribution studies on the lipid nanoparticles show that they literally take those messenger RNA strands into every part of your body. They go into your brain and your lungs and your heart and your liver and your reproductive organs and your bone marrow and everywhere, which is, by the way, why these COVID shots have caused a a greater array of side effects than any other medical treatment in history. Because this toxic spike protein ends up in literally every every part of your body.
Saved - July 22, 2024 at 9:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I once advocated for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, criticizing those who rejected them as foolish. Now, I face a pulmonary embolism and realize I was among those who believed misinformation. Disinformation can be deadly; the vaccines were never safe or effective.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

Jeff Coe pushed COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines on people 2021: "We have more than enough vaccines for all but people like 50% choose to believe lies and conspiracy theories out of utter stupidity" 2024: "there is a clot in my lungs...pulmonary embolism" Turns out he was in the 50% that chose to believe lies and conspiracy theories out of utter stupidity. Disinformation is Deadly - Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines were never safe nor effective #DiedSuddenly

Saved - November 4, 2024 at 8:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the significant rise in excess mortality following the Covid-19 vaccine rollout warrants legal action for transparency on death data. John Beaudoin's research indicates that mRNA vaccines may be linked to millions of deaths and injuries, particularly through conditions like thrombocytopenia. Despite case reports, the CDC and FDA have not acknowledged these risks. I wrote about my friend's death, which I suspect was vaccine-related, to raise awareness. Dr. Gregory Michael's case exemplifies the need for public vigilance regarding vaccine side effects.

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

1/11🧵 The unprecedented increase in excess all-cause mortality following the worldwide Covid-19 vax rollout should be the basis of legal action against governments across the globe from citizens demanding that data related to all known causes of death be released to the public.

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

2/11🧵 The public health mortality data John Beaudoin has compiled showing an increase in specific causes of death is the best evidence there is proving the mRNA Covid jabs have likely caused tens of millions of deaths & injuries worldwide. Thrombocytopenia is one cogent example.

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

3/11🧵 While the CDC acknowledged Jansen's (Johnson & Johnson) Covid vax could cause thrombocytopenia, the FDA/CDC will not admit that the mRNA Covid jabs that killed my friend can also cause severe thrombocytopenia despite numerous case reports showing these jabs can cause this.

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

4/11🧵 Part of what motivated me to write the essay posted on my X profile about how I eventually figured out that Pfizer killed my friend is my desire to educate others on how we know for certain that many whom we were told died from Covid actually died from the mRNA Covid jabs.

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

5/11🧵 Some may recall the unexpected death of 56 year old OB/GYN doctor, Dr. Gregory Michael, who died of "severe thrombocytopenia" two weeks after his Pfizer shots on January 3, 2021 as reported here in the Miami Herald that explains the death was being investigated by the CDC.

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

6/11🧵 Although months later, the Miami Herald published this follow-up article with a misleading headline saying Dr. Michael died from "natural causes," the same article clearly states: "Examiners noted it remains unclear whether his death was directly connected to the vaccine."

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

7/11🧵 And while the FB post the Miami Herald shared from Dr Michael's wife (Heidi Neckelmann) "announcing her husband’s death and to make the public aware of possible side effects of the vaccine" has been removed, thankfully Alex Berenson memorialized it in this bombshell Tweet!

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

8/11🧵 I'm awed by Dr. Michael's wife who courageously tried to warn others saying in her Facebook post: "He was a pro vaccine advocate that is why he got it himself. I believe that people should be aware that side effects can happened (sic), that it is not good for everyone..."

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

9/11🧵 Neckelmann continues in her Facebook post shared by Berenson stating: "and in this case destroyed a beautiful life, a perfect family, and has affected so many people in the community Do not let his death be in vain please save more lives by making this information news."

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

10/11🧵 While numerous case reports prove the mRNA Covid jabs can potentially cause thrombocytopenia in some people, the data John Beaudoin procured proves it is likely one of many signals the CDC/FDA have ignored due to incompetence, negligence, and/or malfeasance. End of Part 1

@jeffblack757 - jeff black

URL Links/Cited Sources per X post below: The Real CDC website:https://therealcdc.com Post 2: Post 3:https://amjcaserep.com/abstract/full/idArt/931478 Post 8: Post 5:https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/miami-beach/article248337525.html#amp_tf=Fr Post 6:https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/miami-beach/article250539119.html#ip=1 Posts 7, 8, 9:

Error 404 Error 404 amjcaserep.com
The Real CdC The Real CdC, aka Coquin de Chien, provides truth in data analyses. John Beaudoin, Sr. is Coquin de Chien and "The Real CdC." John obtained more than one million death certificates and analyzed causes of death, ages of death, and the seasonality (time of year) that deaths occurred in Massachusetts, then in Minnesota. therealcdc.com

@5gvirusnewss - 5G Virüs News - Platformu

DENEK DOKTOR ÖLDÜ! Miami’de mükemmel sağlıklı Dr. Gregory Michael, Pfizer Covid-19 aşısından 16 gün sonra, kan bozuklu nedeni ile öldü. Eşi Heidi Neckelmann, 18 Aralık'ta Mount Sinai Tıp Merkezi'nde aşı olana kadar kocasının tamamen sağlıklı olduğunu söyledi. https://x.com/5gvirusnewss/status/1347228302038228998/photo/1

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

It’s not just the Janssen. That’s a limited hangout ruse by government. THE CDC MEMORANDUM provides facts from official government documents showing that Moderna and Pfizer cvid jabs also cause thrombocytopenia leading to hemorrhagic stroke, GI hemorrhage, and purpura. The Real… https://x.com/i/web/status/1789260988610392260 https://t.co/itRJFwqk9U

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

And now this. Facebook.com/heidi.neckelma… https://t.co/046KzIiRh2

Saved - August 31, 2024 at 1:45 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Cocky Pharmacist admits that he knew the jab was for depopulation and was coerced into giving it to people. He doesn't seem to be phased one bit by killing and disabling people because of his job. His excuse was, that he was "forced" to do it. https://t.co/ZwPYwPL0PF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they personally administered any COVID-19 vaccinations and informs them they may be personally liable and prosecuted under the Nuremberg Code. Speaker 0 claims COVID was a hoax and the shots are for depopulation, having killed or permanently disabled millions. Speaker 1 states the company is liable, not them, because they made sure beforehand that the company would take responsibility and support them administering the shots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you personally administer any COVID 19 vaccinations? Speaker 1: I'm sorry? Speaker 0: Did you personally, administer any COVID 19 vaccinations? Do you know that you may be, personally liable and, prosecuted under the Nuremberg Code? Speaker 1: Yeah. No. It's a it's a thing here, and I I've gone through, and I have I I know what you're doing here, and I'm with you. Speaker 0: You may have some debts on your hands. Speaker 1: Yeah. I I Speaker 0: How many did you administer? Speaker 1: Oh, I don't know. Speaker 0: Yeah. Rough estimate. Speaker 1: Oh, no. Speaker 0: Okay. Because, you know, it's it's recently come out. You know, the the COVID was a hoax and the the the shots are for depopulation. So, you know, you know, it's, it's really bad what happened. Speaker 1: You know? Yeah. Speaker 0: A lot a lot of people fell for it. Speaker 1: No. And, you Speaker 0: know, it's killed millions of people. Let's say permanently disabled, you know, countless millions. So Speaker 1: Yeah. Worldwide. So And that's why the only reason why I did it is because my company is liable for that, not for me because I was fortunate to administer. I'm with him. So that's why I made sure it was beforehand. I told him that, I was gonna take responsibility for it. Told them that wanted me to administer it. They were on the support, me. Okay. Because they told me I was gonna go fly back and stuff. Okay. I got you covered. Thanks, Cheers. Speaker 0: Thank you. Very interesting revelations there. Very interesting. You heard that.
Saved - September 15, 2024 at 12:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a tragic story about a 21-year-old university student, Alexandra Angeles Caycho, who was diagnosed with stage 3 pancreatic cancer, an extremely rare condition for someone her age. Initially believing she had a rugby injury, she received the shocking diagnosis in March 2023 and fought bravely through chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Sadly, she passed away on September 14, 2024. I expressed my concern over the rising cases of what I term "Turbo Cancer" linked to mRNA vaccines, highlighting the discrediting of this issue by mainstream oncology.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

NEW ARTICLE: mRNA Injury stories - UK - 21 year old University Student received an "impossible cancer diagnosis" (Pancreatic Cancer) and was given weeks to live. She just died on Sep.14, 2024 Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines are causing thousands of cases of TURBO CANCER in young people. In my entire career, I have never seen a case of Pancreatic cancer in a 21 year old. Here is what American Cancer Society says about Pancreatic Cancer: "The average age at the time of diagnosis is 70. Almost all patients are older than 45. About two-thirds are at least 65 years old." 21 year old student Alexandra Angeles Caycho thought she was suffering from a rugby injury before she was diagnosed with Stage 3 pancreatic cancer. "The doctors were shocked, they told me it was almost impossible for someone my age to have this disease". Alex was diagnosed with stage 3 pancreatic cancer on March 17 2023, aged just 20. "My future was bright, and I was so excited to start my journey as an artist," she posted on the fundraising page. "But on March 17th, 2023, everything changed. At just 20 years old, I received the devastating news that I had been diagnosed with stage 3 pancreatic cancer. "The doctors were shocked...yet, here I am, facing a battle that no one should ever have to fight." "Since then, I’ve been through endless rounds of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and countless hospital stays. I’ve tried to stay strong, to keep fighting with everything I have, but unfortunately, my journey is coming to an end." Alex died on Sep.14, 2024. Mainstream Oncology in USA and Canada continues to discredit itself by denying the existence of mRNA Induced Turbo Cancer. Meanwhile, mRNA pushing corrupt Oncologists like Dr.David Gorski @Gorskon, whose Blog was financed by child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, continue to be quoted by mainstream media in regards to how mRNA Vaccines are not causing Turbo Cancer. He is even quoted as a "reference" in Wikipedia - that's how deeply corrupt Mainstream Oncology is. Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL in the 1st photo at the top, into your browser to access @TuckerCarlson@JoeRogan #DiedSuddenly

Saved - September 18, 2024 at 3:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to highlight an important story. In a 2021 interview, Drew Griffin, a CNN News Anchor, expressed confidence in his vaccination. Tragically, he was diagnosed with cancer shortly after and passed away from what some are calling "turbocancer" in 2022.

@BusyDrT - Dr Sherri Tenpenny

Don’t let this story get buried! Dr. Buttar & CNN News Anchor Drew Griffin in a 2021 interview. #DrewGriffin: 'I’m vaccinated. You think there is a ticking time bomb in me and I’m going to die?' Listen to what #DrButtar had to say … Drew did in fact die shortly thereafter 😔 My understanding is that he was diagnosed with cancer shortly after his bioweapon shot & died of #turbocancer in 2022

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states they don't want to be part of what they see as a mass genocide, believing the current time will be remembered as worse than World War II. They express hope that they are raising doubt about a vaccine and invite someone to meet in three years to see how they are doing, suggesting it is probable they will not be alive due to the vaccine. Speakers 1 and 2 share news of the passing of CNN journalist Drew Griffin. Griffin, a colleague and friend, had been with CNN for nearly two decades and was responsible for impactful journalism in politics, sports, government, and big business. He asked tough questions and made a real difference in people's lives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't want to be part of this mass genocide that I see happening. And I think that what's going on right now will be remembered as a worse time in history compared to Speaker 1: what World War II happened. Speaker 0: You are raising doubt about a vaccine. I hope I am because I hope more people take heed of the warning that is necessary. You think I'm vaccinated, right? You think I have a time bomb in me and I'm going to die? I hope not. But let me let you I'll be happy to meet you in 3 years and then see how you're doing. But you think that's possible? I think that it's probable. You you think I'm vaccinated. Right? You think I have a time bomb in me, and I'm going to play? I hope not. But let me I'll be happy to meet you in 3 years and then see how you're doing. But you think that it's possible? I think that it's probable. Speaker 1: We have some stunningly heartbreaking news to share with you this morning that our colleague, our friend, and truly distinguished CNN journalist, Drew Griffin, passed away in the last 24 hours. Drew had been with CNN for nearly 2 decades. In that time, he was responsible for some of the most impactful journalism of this company in politics, sports, government, big business. He was a good man, a tremendous journalist, a huge part of this network. Speaker 2: He absolutely was. He asked the tough questions as anybody who watches CNN knows. He chased down folks who didn't want to hear them, didn't want to answer them. He made a real difference in the lives of countless people. Here's Anderson Cooper now with a look back at Drew's remarkable life. Speaker 0: It was so high.
Saved - October 4, 2024 at 1:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that a Senior Scientist for the Florida Dept of Health Response Team for COVID-19 has passed away. Tobias Grundtner, who once joked about the mRNA vaccine's effects, died suddenly at 50 on September 8, 2024. His humor about the vaccine took a dark turn with his unexpected death.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

Senior Scientist for Florida Dept of Health Response Team for COVID-19 has died Tobias Grundtner thought COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine safety was a great topic for jokes Oct.2023: "My vaccine injection site sparked all the way down my arm, activating my George Soros Deep State Decoder Ring. My eyes have started to glow; I feel stronger, faster - unstoppable" Tobias died suddenly at age 50 on Sep.8, 2024. #DiedSuddenly

Saved - October 13, 2024 at 11:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share that the first peer-reviewed protocol using Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole for cancer treatment has been published! I’m grateful to the lead authors and Dr. Paul Marik for their dedication to repurposed drugs. This paper could pave the way for a new era in cancer care. I've been assisting many cancer patients with these treatments and am witnessing remarkable results. While some oncologists have faltered, others are forging a new path forward. Looking ahead to what’s next!

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

BREAKING NEWS: First-in-the-World Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol in Cancer has been peer-reviewed and published on Sep.19, 2024! The future of Cancer Treatment starts NOW. My thanks to lead authors Ilyes Baghli and Pierrick Martinez for their incredible inspired work, FLCCC’s Dr.Paul Marik for his extensive work on repurposed drugs and every co-author who worked hard to bring this paper to life. I hope that this peer-reviewed paper lays the groundwork for a brand new future for Cancer Treatment. Many of you know that I have been helping thousands of Cancer patients with high dose Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole. We are already starting to see incredible successes with these repurposed drugs. Mainstream Oncology collapsed after the rollout of contaminated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Most Oncologists abandoned their Hippocratic Oath, gave contaminated mRNA Vaccines to all their cancer patients and took the mRNA jabs themselves. Some Oncologists have now developed mRNA Induced Cardiac arrests, blood clots and Turbo Cancer. Others have already died suddenly. These Oncologists buried their heads in the sand and abandoned everything that it takes to be a good competent doctor. However, there are doctors who are blazing a new path into the future. See you there! 😃 @TuckerCarlson @joerogan

Saved - October 14, 2024 at 6:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share that the first peer-reviewed protocol using Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole for cancer treatment has been published! I’m grateful to the lead authors and everyone involved in this groundbreaking work. I've been assisting many cancer patients with these repurposed drugs and am witnessing remarkable successes. Meanwhile, mainstream oncology has faltered, with some oncologists facing severe health issues after administering contaminated mRNA vaccines. However, there are dedicated doctors paving a new path forward.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

BREAKING NEWS: First-in-the-World Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol in Cancer has been peer-reviewed and published on Sep.19, 2024! The future of Cancer Treatment starts NOW. My thanks to lead authors Ilyes Baghli and Pierrick Martinez for their incredible inspired work, FLCCC’s Dr.Paul Marik for his extensive work on repurposed drugs and every co-author who worked hard to bring this paper to life. I hope that this peer-reviewed paper lays the groundwork for a brand new future for Cancer Treatment. Many of you know that I have been helping thousands of Cancer patients with high dose Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole. We are already starting to see incredible successes with these repurposed drugs. Mainstream Oncology collapsed after the rollout of contaminated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Most Oncologists abandoned their Hippocratic Oath, gave contaminated mRNA Vaccines to all their cancer patients and took the mRNA jabs themselves. Some Oncologists have now developed mRNA Induced Cardiac arrests, blood clots and Turbo Cancer. Others have already died suddenly. These Oncologists buried their heads in the sand and abandoned everything that it takes to be a good competent doctor. However, there are doctors who are blazing a new path into the future. See you there! 😃 @MakisMD

Saved - October 25, 2024 at 12:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canada has begun euthanizing individuals injured by the COVID-19 vaccine, with reports of an Ontario man in his late 40s being the first case. His death was attributed to a post-vaccination syndrome after experiencing severe functional decline. I have long predicted this outcome, highlighting how the medical community and government officials have neglected and abandoned the vaccine-injured. The trend suggests that MAID will increasingly be used to end the lives of those affected, as they pose a threat to the narrative surrounding vaccine safety.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

BREAKING NEWS: Canada starts euthanizing the COVID-19 Vaccine Injured. Ontario doctors have murdered the first Vaccine Injured man and are coming for the rest! So this is the latest BREAKING NEWS out of Canada. Doctors have started killing off the COVID-19 Vaccine Injured, something I repeatedly predicted would happen. You really can't make this up (this was reported by the National Post on Oct.24, 2024): "An Ontario man in his late 40s with a history of mental illness died by euthanasia after his assisted death assessors decided that the most reasonable explanation for his physical decline was a post COVID-19 “vaccination syndrome.”" If you're reading this, read it a few times and let it sink in. Because this will impact the rest of the world. "Identified as “Mr. A,” the man experienced “suffering and functional decline” following three vaccinations for SARS-CoV-2" "his MAID assessors “opined that the most reasonable diagnosis for Mr. A’s clinical presentation (severe functional decline) was a post-vaccine syndrome, in keeping with chronic fatigue syndrome.”" I'll stop there, because the story just keeps getting worse. I've predicted this in dozens of articles and interviews over the past year, and I don't think anyone listened, or took me seriously, but here we are. MAID will become the main vehicle to kill off the COVID-19 Vaccine injured. Everyone involved in the COVID-19 Vaccine Fraud wants the Vaccine injured dead: ➡️ doctors who gave the shots (you can tell by how they treat or abandon the vaccine injured). ➡️ scientists who pushed the mRNA fraud (they despise the vaccine injured and viciously attack them online) ➡️ media and propagandists for big pharma (they ignore the vaccine injured and minimize the damage done to them - gaslighting) ➡️ compromised health officials (they reject all vaccine injury reports or bury them) ➡️ politicians (they pretend vaccine injuries don’t exist and aren’t a serious issue to be addressed) Since the Vaccine cult is a death cult, it was always going to go this way for the mRNA vaccine injured. That’s why the Vaccine Injured receive no support, no funding, no research, no treatment and no compensation. It’s not nice for me to say this, but the goal of the Vaccine Cartel was always to kill off the Vaccine Injured. They represent too much evidence - evidence of vaccine fraud, contaminated vaccines, etc. The next step will be scaling up the MAID killings of the vaccine injured, as hundreds of thousands of Canadians are severely COVID-19 Vaccine Injured. Since @JustinTrudeau is staying on, we can expect this process to accelerate. Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL in the 1st photo at the top, into your browser to access @ABDanielleSmith #DiedSuddenly

Saved - November 2, 2024 at 4:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In June 2021, I expressed deep concerns about vaccine safety, but I was dismissed as a conspiracy theorist, and my university placed me on leave. I had everything to lose by speaking out, yet it's crucial to listen to voices like mine. Never forget this.

@ryangerritsen - Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

In June of 2021 Dr. Byram Bridle was already very concerned about the safety of the vaccine. No one listened to him, the media called him a conspiracy theorist, The University of Guelph put him on leave of absence. A virologist's warning ignored. Never forget. https://t.co/uRBf7gqxd3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Since the pandemic began, I have aimed to provide objective scientific insights as a publicly funded servant. Regarding concerns about heart inflammation linked to COVID-19 vaccines, I acknowledge the potential connection based on extensive scientific literature and reports from Pfizer to regulatory agencies. Traditional vaccine technology suggests that vaccines remain at the injection site, but this does not apply to mRNA vaccines, which disperse throughout the body. Research shows that only about 25% of the vaccine dose stays in the shoulder. Polyethylene glycol, a component of the vaccine, enhances this distribution, allowing lipid nanoparticles to evade immune cells that would normally capture the antigen for immune activation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pandemic was declared, I have been trying to serve as a voice of objective scientific opinion. I am a publicly funded servant. So I'm public servant. You pay for me, Canadians, from your tax dollars. I work at an academic institution, which is publicly funded, and therefore, I see it as my responsibility to Canadians. When I was asked if I'm concerned or if I saw potential for a link between heart inflammation, the COVID nineteen vaccines, I said I did. And this is why. What we have learned and and we've learned this from a large body of scientific literature. We've also learned this from reports that were submitted by Pfizer themselves to regulatory agencies, one in particular to a regulatory agency in Japan. And what we have learned is I'm very familiar with vaccines, and traditional vaccine technology would tell us that when you put a vaccine into the shoulder, and that's where we get vaccinated with the COVID 19 vaccines, traditional vaccine technology tells us the vaccine would stay on the shoulder. And then what happened is cells from the immune system would come and pick up the spike protein. All these vaccines get our bodies to manufacture the spike protein. Right? So cells in the immune system pick up that spike protein, take it to the local draining lymph node, and activate the immune system. And so what we have found is that this assumption about the vaccine remaining in the shoulder does not apply to this novel vaccine technology. It's never been in people before. These messenger RNA vaccines get distributed throughout the whole body. What we have found in fact is that as little as 25% of the dose remains in the shoulder, and it traffics all over the body. Also, many of you might have heard of polyethylene glycol because that is one of the components of the vaccine that sometimes people develop anaphylactic shock to. That polyethylene glycol, just so that you know, is designed to help facilitate that spread throughout the body. You get about 5 fold greater spread throughout the body with a polyethylene glycol there. Do you know why? Because when the polyethylene glycol is there, it actually helps lipid nanoparticles bypass the very cells of our immune system that are supposed to pick up the antigen and take it to our lymph nodes.

@ryangerritsen - Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

This man had everything to lose holding this press conference. These are the ones people should have been listening to.

Saved - November 4, 2024 at 3:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that 59-year-old German journalist Stefan Hans Klasener passed away unexpectedly on October 13, 2024. He had been a strong advocate for lockdowns and COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. It raises questions about whether pro-vaccine journalists were truly committed or misled.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

GERMAN PRO LOCKDOWN Journalist Dead 59 year old German Journalist Stefan Hans Klasener died suddenly on Oct.13, 2024, after advocating for lockdowns and mass COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Do you think these pro vaccine journalists were always willing to "die for the cause" or the were tricked into it? #DiedSuddenly

Saved - January 1, 2025 at 10:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In this extensive thread, I share alarming evidence and personal testimonies linking COVID injections to a rise in aggressive cancers, termed "turbo cancers." Experts, including oncologists and pathologists, describe how these vaccines may suppress the immune system, leading to rapid cancer progression. Anecdotal accounts from individuals reveal a troubling pattern of aggressive cancers developing shortly after vaccination. Scientific studies and VAERS data suggest significant increases in cancer rates post-vaccination, raising serious concerns about the long-term effects of these injections.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

THE COVID INJECTIONS CAUSE AGGRESSIVE (TURBO) CANCERS EN MASSE: A MEGA-THREAD SHOWCASING THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF AN UNTHINKABLE HORROR THAT WILL TOUCH US ALL (1/57+)🧵 (Stick this thread on any post with a Community Note saying the injections don’t cause turbo cancers.) Thread index: Tweets 1–16: Physicians, Scientists, and Industry Experts—from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, and Sweden—Describe How the COVID Injections Cause Turbo Cancers The injections— -Severely degrade the immune system, particularly causing T-cell suppression -Are adulterated with DNA plasmids, which contain the notorious SV40 promoter sequence, which has not only been associated with oncogenesis, but also binding with P53 a.k.a. “the guardian of the genome” -Are associated with far more aggressive cancers than what was normal prior to the injections’ rollout -Are associated with increasing rates of cancers Tweets 17–23: Anecdotal interviews with people describing aggressive cancers in themselves, their friends, or family members who’ve taken one or more COVID injections. Tweets 24–39: Evidence in the scientific literature and regulatory documentation that supports the idea that the COVID injections degrade the immune system, are capable of causing aggressive cancers, and contain DNA and SV40 contamination. Tweets 40–47: A—small—sample of the VAERS reports linking the COVID injections to various types of cancers. Tweets 48–57: Users on X speak out about themselves, family, or friends who developed an aggressive, often fatal, cancer following receipt of one or more COVID injections. NOTE: Please add your own COVID injection–related “turbo cancer” story to this thread to bolster the already overwhelming evidence that it is indeed a real phenomenon. —----------------------- DR. DAVID RASNICK—“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer is that these [COVID] injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” In this first tweet, we start by hearing from cancer and AIDS research titan Dr. David Rasnick, who notes in a 2024 interview with Children’s Health Defense that this phenomenon of “turbo cancers” is new, and is defined by cancers that appear and grow to Stage 3 or Stage 4—i.e. “lethal”—in a matter of months. Rasnick, who earned a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1978, has more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, published numerous scientific papers, and invented novel laboratory techniques, notes that these turbo cancers are also affecting younger people than usual, including people in their 20s. “When it [the turbo cancer] develops, they get late stage cancer and they’re dead really, really quickly,” Rasnick says. “That is new.” Furthermore, Rasnick says the only other time these kinds of rapid-growing cancers have been observed was in lab animals that were made to be immune deficient “by design.” “I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer,” Rasnick says, “is that these [COVID] injections…these mRNA and DNA genetic injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” Rasnick adds, “Once your immune system is really, really depressed, now these things [cancers] can develop rapidly.” The cancer researcher adds, “We’re basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals: We’re destroying their immune systems to the point where they can’t resist the cancer. And the cancers are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don’t have anything impeding their ability to proliferate.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Turbo cancer refers to a concerning trend where cancer progresses from initial stages to advanced stages in a matter of months, particularly in young individuals. This rapid development is linked to a compromised immune system, likely due to mRNA and DNA vaccines, which are described as genetic injections rather than traditional vaccines. These injections appear to weaken the immune response, allowing tumors that may have been benign or dormant to grow unchecked. This phenomenon mirrors previous observations in immune-deficient animals, suggesting that the same detrimental effects are now occurring in humans. Essentially, the immune system's inability to combat cancer cells leads to accelerated tumor growth, akin to conditions observed in laboratory settings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The turbo cancer thing, which is new, is that instead of taking decades for the cancer to develop all the way from nowhere to stage 3 and stage 4, which which release the cancers, we we're seeing this happen now in the order of months. And in young people like in their twenties, and and they get really when it develops, they get late stage cancer and they're dead really really quickly. That is new. The only time we have ever seen this rapid or so called turbo, that's what they call it now, we just call it accelerated cancer in the animals or things because they were immune deficient by by design. Now what we're doing, I think the simplest, best explanation and I'm convinced the true explanation of what's behind turbo cancer is is that these injections, these, nucleoside, I mean, these mRNA and DNA vaccines, these genetic injections, they're not vaccines, these genetic injections are devastating the immune system. We we we know that's happening already but now we're seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system. That's an acceleration of tumors that were probably already in you to begin with where benign probably go away on their own. You'd never know you've had it. And but once your immune system is really really depressed, now these things can develop rapidly. And we can we know that in animals, we've caused it in animals, you know, for decades. I personally didn't. I didn't work with those cool things. I was just a regular laboratory as a chemist. But, so now we're doing it in people. We're basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals. We're destroying their immune systems to the point where, they they can't resist the cancer, and the cancer cells are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don't have anything impeding impeding their their, their ability to proliferate. And, that that in a nutshell is what turbocancer is.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(2/57) DR. RYAN COLE — “[These shots]...cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer.” In this clip from a 2023 interview with Greg Hunter, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and founder of Cole Diagnostics Inc. in Boise, Idaho, says that he saw early warning signs of immune system suppression following the rollout of the COVID injections and warned people that they “suppress the immune system.” Cole notes that the injections “alter the way your immune system works.” He adds that they “[put] your T cells to sleep” in such a way that they can’t perform their “surveillance” duties “to fight cancer.” The veteran pathologist adds that he has traveled the world, talking to oncologists, pathologists, family doctors, et al., who say that they’re “seeing cancers…in age groups…never seen before, and it happened after the rollout of the shots.” Cole adds that insurance datasets and some countries’ disability data confirms the huge uptick in cancers. In the U.K., for example, Cole says that in 2021, there was a 6–7% rise in cancers; in 2022, there was a staggering 35% increase. “Those are the types of data that we’re seeing that [are] really concerning,” Cole adds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people have received COVID shots for various reasons. However, there are concerning trends regarding autoimmune diseases, heart inflammation in young people, and rising cancer rates. The lipid nanoparticle mRNA technology used in these vaccines has not been proven safe long-term. These shots may suppress the immune system, particularly T cells, which are crucial for fighting infections and cancer. This immune suppression has led to what some are calling "turbo cancers," characterized by aggressive and unusual tumor behavior. Reports from pathologists indicate an increase in aggressive cancers in younger populations since the vaccine rollout, with significant rises in cancer rates noted in disability datasets. The data is alarming and suggests a need for caution regarding these vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So many people got these shots, you know, for whatever reason I'm not here to judge. If you got 1, don't get 2. If you get 2, don't get 3. If you got 3, don't get 4. If you never got 1, please don't get 1. And here's why: because the amount of autoimmune disease we're seeing, the amount of inflammation in the hearts of healthy young people that we're seeing, the amount of neurologic damage and harm, Parkinson's, exacerbation, worsening of of dementia and Alzheimer's disease, and, you know, to bring the monster in the room, cancer, is on the uptick. And, and it's not me just saying, oh, well, you know, my job as a pathologist is to observe patterns, and if I see something, I say something. And what do you hear in the airports when you travel? If you see something, say something. Well, I did, and I still am. It's not just that these COVID shots are bad, it's anything with the lipid nanoparticle mRNA technology shot is not proven to be long term safe. So it's this whole platform that we have. So we're we're in trouble. We're seeing steady rises in all these chronic diseases that I mentioned, and you mentioned Greg, and unfortunately the cancer, statistics, I saw an early warning sign when these shots rolled out. I was the first one in the world to go public with it and said, hey, yeah, I did. And Really? I yeah. And at that point, I knew. I said, look, we have immune dysregulation. You want a healthy immune system. These shots suppress the immune system. Doctor Fossa out of the Netherlands, when he looked at the Pfizer vaccines and studies, showed that it was altering the way your immune system works. That's not good. It puts your t cells to sleep in a manner that they can't fight, and t cells are basically the marines of your immune system. They're in the frontline warriors, and all day long, you know, you and I sitting here right now, anybody listening, we have about 30,000,000,000 T cells circulating around in our body, and they're shaking hands and talking to yourselves, Hey, are you a friend? Are you a a foe? Are you infected? Are you a cancer cell? You know, what do we do with you? And so it's just knocking on the door, checking all the time with all your cells. Well, these shots, instead of having those be hearty, on the front line, healthy soldiers, it makes them kind of drunk and go back to the barracks and go to sleep. And now they can't do that surveillance, on the, you know, exactly to fight cancer, and so people ask, well, well, you know, do these shots cause cancer? Well, they cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and a dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer. So that's what we're up against. And so, yeah, I shouted the warning early on, I was attacked for doing so, and here we are, all the data points that we can get are going upward. And there are a lot of data points Hold Speaker 1: on just a minute, I just want to, before Speaker 0: we get in. Yeah. Anytime. I'll write it. Speaker 1: When you say it doesn't cause cancer, you are one of the people that have used this turbo cancer. So we're getting turbo cancers because there's nothing there to fight it. Speaker 0: Well, yeah. Because those T cells have gone to sleep to a degree that they would normally fight off cancer, and now they're not there to fight off that cancer. And so the the term turbo cancer, a good friend in Sweden, pathologist, Doctor Ute Kruger, she was the one seeing, after the rollout of the shots, a really big uptick in breast cancers in her pathology practice. And these tumors were more aggressive, were larger than she was used to seeing, and were behaving in a manner that she hadn't seen before, so she called them turbocancers. And then that term got popularized and kind of spread around the world. And as I travel the world, talk to physicians, oncologists, pathologists, family docs, internists, OBGYNs, you name it, and they come to me at these meetings and say, I'm seeing cancers in my practice in age groups I've never seen before and it happened after the rollout of the shots. And the datasets are available in insurance datasets and in some countries we can get into the disability datasets like the United Kingdom, Ed Dowd and his group at financetechnologies.com with a PH, they they went in and looked at the disability dataset. In 2020 there was about a 1 point something percent increase in cancer, in 2021, about 6-seven percent, but in 2022, there was a 35% expected above average. So those are the type of data we're seeing that is really concerning.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(3/57) DR. ROGER HODKINSON— “The immune system has been taken off its watch…[there could be] a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” In this clip from a 2022 interview with the RAIR Foundation, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a medical specialist in pathology, a graduate of Cambridge University, and a Fellow at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC), echoes Dr. Ryan Cole’s concerns regarding the COVID injections’ deleterious effects on the immune system. “One of the primary functions of the immune system is to surveil the entire body, looking for little, tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that kills you…[And] with the [COVID] vaccination, having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape,” Hodkinson says. The pathologist adds, “the immune system has been…taken off its watch…and the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done.” Hodkinson goes on to note: “[This] could result in a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” He adds, “When…something of this magnitude…is not studied, that is cause for enormous concern. Because that is not the way medicine works.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent reports suggest a significant increase in cancer rates post-vaccination, with anecdotal evidence indicating a potential tripling. The exact incidence remains unclear, but the immune system's role in identifying and eliminating early cancer cells is crucial. Vaccination may temporarily impair immune surveillance, allowing cancers to proliferate unchecked. This raises concerns about a possible surge in cancer cases resulting from the vaccination program. Some healthcare professionals, like Dr. Ryan Cole in Idaho, have noted increased cancer activity, highlighting the lack of thorough studies typically associated with vaccine development. Normally, vaccines undergo extensive research over several years, but this process was expedited in this case, raising alarms about potential complications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been a lot of reports recently about it well, the the number I've been seeing kicked around is a 300% or tripling of cancer rates since the rollout of the injections. Speaker 1: Is that Speaker 0: your understanding? And do would you wanna go into the mechanism of that a little bit? Speaker 1: Yes. The true incidence of, cancer post vaccination is still not clear. What is clear is that there are enough anecdotal reports, globally, to strongly suggest that that is happening. The mechanism by which that would take place is very clear and well known. Because the immune system, does not just fight off infections, which is what most people think of. The job of the immune system is to figure out anything that's not you that's entering your body or is in your body. And of course, bugs are one thing that's not you. But equally, cancer, because of the fact that it's only a cancer because it's mutated. The DNA is different from you. The immune system, one of the prime functions of the immune system, is to constantly surveil the entire body looking for little tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that eventually kills you. And we believe that that process is is going on for our entire lives with meticulous efficiency because it's only when the balance of forces changes for various reasons as we get older that those little cancers don't get knocked off and do escape control. So with the vaccination having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, The the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape. That the immune system has been basically taken off its watch for a period of time. And during that period of time, the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done. How prevalent that is, it's very unclear right now. Early. Again, we don't know what we don't know. And it could result in it could could result in a tsunami of conditions, cancer and other conditions, that have been brought on specifically and unintentionally by this vaccination program. Speaker 0: My. So that's something to definitely keep an eye for. Anecdotally, apparently, some on call just are reporting considerably more activity Speaker 1: than others. Doctor Ryan Cole, particularly in Idaho, was the first one to blow the whistle, but he's not the only one. It's you you see, when there's something of this magnitude, which is so obvious, when there's something of that magnitude that's not studied, that's cause for enormous concern. Because that's not the way medicine works. Vaccines, for example, vaccines are usually studied with great thoroughness for 5 to 10 years. Ordinary vaccines. Not a new technology, but just ordinary. You know, an attenuated virus, a dead virus. That's what we normally do. This time, that was trashed. Wholesale. Trashed. For something, there's nothing worse than a bad seasonal flu with all these gigantic potential complications.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(4/57) SCIENTIST KEVIN MCKERNAN—”The EMA…has documents that have leaked showing a one to 815-fold variance in the amount of DNA contamination that are in these vaccines.” In this clip from a presentation given to the International COVID Summit in 2024, Kevin McKernan, Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Medicinal Genomics, as well as former R&D lead of the Human Genome Project, describes how there is “DNA contamination” in the mRNA COVID injections from both Pfizer and Moderna. McKernan notes that there is DNA plasmid contamination of between one and 815-fold from injection lot to injection lot (i.e. batch to batch) and that the contamination has been found by scientists in multiple states in the U.S. and in Germany. (The one to 815-fold figure means that the amount of DNA plasmids present in a given injection is up to 815 times the allowable amount set by regulatory agencies.) McKernan notes that regulators have, in turn, been forced to respond to the contamination and that the FDA in the U.S., the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada have all confirmed that there is indeed DNA plasmids in the COVID mRNA injections. McKernan notes that the regulators have also confirmed that this DNA contamination includes the so-called “SV40 promoter,” which is a DNA sequence derived from the Simian Virus 40 that enhances gene expression. I.e. the SV40 promoter helps to import the contaminating DNA plasmids into the nucleus of the cell. Furthermore, McKernan notes that the inclusion of the SV40 in the contaminating DNA plasmids was originally withheld from the regulators by Pfizer. Note that, as outlined in the documentation in tweet 39 in this mega-thread, an FDA guidance document published back in 2010 states the following: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic [i.e. cancer causing] and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is significant evidence of DNA contamination in vaccines, with findings from multiple researchers in Germany, Japan, France, and the U.S. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA acknowledge this contamination but downplay its importance based on Pfizer's reassurances. Initially, clinical trials used clean DNA, but the mass-produced vaccines used unfiltered plasma DNA, increasing contamination. The regulators received a misleading plasmid map, omitting crucial annotations. Claims about expired vials are false, as tests show decay can be measured accurately. Critics argue that the PCR methods used by regulators are inadequate, and Moderna's vaccines are cleaner. The regulators' use of different measurement methods for RNA and DNA raises concerns about transparency and compliance with regulations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we do have is reproduction in spades. We now have people in Germany, Japan. We have people in France who have seen this DNA contamination. The EMA even has documents that have leaked showing there is a one to 8 15 fold variance in the amount of DNA contamination there in these vaccines. That was data that was given to them cherry picked by Pfizer. We also have Doctor. Buchholz work in South Carolina that has replicated this qPCR. He's even done Oxford Nanopore sequencing on this. Doctor. Xin Lee has done Sanger sequencing in Connecticut. Doctor. Bridget Koning has done work in Germany. This much reproduction has forced the regulators to respond. We've got responses now from the FDA, from the EMA and from Health Canada that have all acknowledged this contamination is there. Now they disagree that it matters because they turn to their sponsors to get that answer. They've gone to Pfizer and asked them what is in these shots and doesn't matter. And they were handed an answer saying it's of no consequence. I'm going to show you why they're wrong on those three points. Let's back up a little bit. What happened here, in the clinical trials, they actually ran the clinical trial and clean DNA that was PCR amplified from a plasmid template, all right. That makes it a million fold cleaner above background. They then did a bait and switch. And when they went to the mass market with this, they gave everyone vaccines that skipped that PCR step and therefore was working off of plasma DNA alone. What that means is more background DNA from the plasma gets into the vaccines and more endotoxin presumably gets into the vaccines. This bait and switch was documented into Rest of Levy had published this. So what did they hand to the regulators? They handed the regulators this plasmid map on the right, which you'll notice is missing any sequence annotation from 6 to 9 on the map. That's very awkward. If you ever use plasmid annotation tools, they annotate everything on the map and they don't leave anything unannotated. So some big advisor had to go in and actively delete this annotation and hand it to the regulators and market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. Well, they're hiding the fact that this tool will define their system as a gene therapy, because it's a nuclear targeting sequencing. It moves DNA directly to the nucleus within hours in all cell lines, all right? Now they've also tried to attack the fact that we used expired vials. It's not true. We've had other people use vials that aren't expired. And this is a really bad position of theirs to take because they gave expired vials to patients. And it's very easy for you to measure whether something has decayed with an RNA integrity plot. We've done that. So this is a red herring. It's also a little bit bizarre. They've challenged that our PCR results aren't using proper methods. They have not published their methods. But you can go to Moderna's own patents, which will teach you that qPCR underestimates the problem, and therefore they had to invent new tools to get rid of the cna. Moderna does have cleaner vaccines, by the way, from a DNA standpoint. Why did they do this? Well, the regulators in some jurisdictions are letting them measure the DNA with 2 different yardsticks, and they care about a ratio of RNA to DNA. So what they do is they use a different method that inflates the RNA values, something known as fluorometry, and then they move to qPCR to measure the DNA. Now you've all probably had a COVID test or know that they measure RNA. So if you have primers that can measure DNA and you don't use them to measure the RNA, you are a fraud. And the regulators either don't know this or they are complicit in the crime. They're letting them use 2 different yarnsticks because without these 2 different yarnsticks, they can't pass these regulations.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(5/57) PROF. ANGUS DALGLEISH—“[The] synthetic DNA contamination…in…vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines…presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers…” Professor Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St. George’s, University of London, describes in a presentation given to the Special Council at Port Hedland Town in Western Australia in 2024 how the DNA contamination found in the COVID mRNA injections by McKernan, et al. “can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases.” “Synthetic DNA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines by David Speicher presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases,” Dalgleish says. “The vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles, which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body, where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such these vaccines are not ‘vaccines,’ they are, in fact, gene therapy based. This genomic integration, as the scientific literature makes clear, can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption, and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected…in some cases are extraordinary, and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product.” Dalgleish goes on to note: “While this may sound like a remote possibility…we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the U.K., I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February 2022. Patients who had been cancer free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive, explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. I personally counted six cases in as many weeks in patients who developed a rapid progression, having been completely stable, with zero disease, having been on an immunotherapy I had given them 5, 8, 10, 15, 18 years ago.” Dalgleish adds: “All these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they had all been forced to have a [COVID-injection] booster by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects of the nature of these cancers is that they are not slow progressing…they are aggressive, often presenting at advanced stages, affecting multiple organs by the time they are diagnosed. Colorectal cancer has specifically shown explosive growth—something we’ve never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would expect in patients who otherwise have been stable.” Dalgleish also notes a rise in blood cancers, such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have “appeared shortly after vaccinations.” “I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the timing of these cancers following what I believe are totally unnecessary boosters, which is not an isolated issue,” the oncologist goes on to say. “My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the T cell response and switch[es] the antibody response to tolerizing. That means this is the perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign invaders, viruses, etc. and cancer, allowing it to grow uncontrolled.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Research indicates risks of foreign synthetic DNA integrating into human cells, potentially leading to serious health issues like cancer and immune disorders. Contamination found in Australian vials of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines raises concerns about genomic instability. These vaccines function more like gene therapy, as lipid nanoparticles deliver synthetic DNA into the body, where it may integrate into our genetic material. In clinical observations, patients who had been cancer-free for years experienced aggressive relapses after receiving COVID-19 booster doses. Notably, colorectal cancer cases are growing rapidly, and there is an increase in blood cancers like leukemias and lymphomas post-vaccination. The timing of these cancers has raised alarms among healthcare professionals. Research shows that boosters may suppress T-cell responses, impairing the immune system's ability to combat foreign invaders and cancer, leading to uncontrolled growth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Decades of research have demonstrated the risks of foreign DMA integrating into human cells leading to potentially catastrophic outcomes. Synthetic DMA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID 19 vaccines by David Spiker presents risks of a genomic instability which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases. To explain in more straightforward terms, the vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such, these vaccines are not vaccines. They are in fact a gene therapy based. This genomic integration, as the scientific literature makes clear, can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption, and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected up to a 145 times missile per missile limit in some cases are extraordinary and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product. The real world evidence from the UK, While this may sound like a remote possibility, I am here to tell you that we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the UK, I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February 2022. Patients who had been cancer free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID 19 vaccine. I personally counted 6 cases in as many weeks in patients who developed a rapid progression having been completely stable with 0 disease having been on the immunotherapy I gave them 5, 8, 10, 15, 18 years ago. I am used to people who, progress when they develop severe depression, such as during divorce, bereavement, debt, etcetera. But all these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they've all been forced to have a booster by the patient by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects in the nature of these cancers is that they're not slow progressing that we are accustomed to managing. They are aggressive, often presenting in advanced stages affecting multiple organs by the time they're diagnosed. Colorectal cancer, in particular, is showing explosive growth, something we've never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would expect in patients who otherwise been stable. In addition to cancer relapses, I've encountered a rise in blood cancers such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have appeared shortly after vaccinations. I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the timing of these cancers following what I believe to be totally unnecessary boosters. It is not an isolated issue. My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the t cell response and switch the antibody response to tolerizing. That means this is a perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign, invaders, viruses, etcetera, and cancer, allowing it to grow uncontrolled.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(6/57) DR. UTE KRÜGER—“Ultimately, I saw a correlation that the tumors appeared on average three [3] months after these so-called ‘vaccinations.’” In this clip from an interview with klaTVEnglish from 2024, Dr. Ute Krüger, a pathologist and breast cancer researcher in Sweden, describes her experience witnessing the exact same phenomenon Dr. Angus Dalgleish did in the previous tweet: explosive, aggressive cancers that appeared in cancer patients who were previously stable prior to receiving one or more COVID injections. Krüger describes how, following the rollout of the COVID injections, she began to see the largest tumors she had ever seen in her career. “And the tumors simply grew more aggressively, and there were more frequent occurrences, [meaning] relapses,” Krüger adds. The pathologist and breast cancer researcher notes: “Patients may have been tumor free for 20 years, and then a few months after these injections against corona, the tumor suddenly came back. And with such aggressiveness that the patients often died as a result.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tumors have been growing more aggressively, with sizes ranging from 4 to 16 centimeters, and patients experiencing frequent recurrences. Some patients, previously tumor-free for years, saw rapid tumor regrowth after COVID-19 vaccinations. Multifocal tumors, where multiple tumors appear in one breast, have also increased. For example, a 55-year-old patient had a 13-centimeter ductal carcinoma with over 20 invasive spots. Another case involved an 80-year-old who found a rapidly growing tumor in her previously operated breast just three months post-vaccination, along with skin metastases. Additionally, a 70-year-old woman with lobular breast cancer experienced explosive tumor growth in the liver after vaccination, leading to her death within a month. Observations indicate that tumors often reappear approximately three months after these vaccinations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in the past, a tumor was the size yeah. With the size of 4 centimeters was very rare. Now tumors were 4 to 16 centimeters. The largest tumor I've seen was 16 centimeters in size. You have to look at that on a ruler. It's huge. And the tumors simply grew more aggressively, and there were more frequent recurrences, so relapses. Patients may have been tumor free for 20 years, and then Speaker 1: a few months after these injections against corona, the tumor suddenly came back. And I'm not Speaker 0: against corona, the tumor Speaker 1: suddenly came back. And with Speaker 0: such aggressiveness that the patients often died as a result. And then I noticed that it occurred more frequently that there are several tumors in one breast, for for example. So multi multifocal tumors. And also that tumors occur in both breasts at the same time. Speaker 1: This foreign word means that there are several tumors in one place. Speaker 0: Yes. Exactly. The multifocality that there are several tumors in one breast. I brought some images with me of this, which show this, this multifocality. This is material from a 55 year old female patient who has a 130 millimeter ductal carcinoma. In other words, a tumor in the breast that is growing in the ducts. So 13 centimeters alone is extremely large. And in this area, she had 20 different so at least 20 different invasive. In other words, spots where the tumor had already grown out of the ducts and into the tissue. And here in the picture, you can see in the blue area, this is the area with the tumor in the ducts. And these red areas show these invasive foci where the tumor is already growing into the tissue. So here in this section alone, there are 7 invasive foci. Speaker 1: This picture here is a cross section? Speaker 0: Exactly. This is how the pathologist sees the material under the microscope. This is a cross section of the breast, and this is how the diagnosis finally made in pathology. There was also a pronounced growth in the lymph vessel far outside of the tumor. And she already had had 4 lymph node metastases. So the lymph nodes were already affected, which is also relatively rare. But that is because the tumor has grown so aggressively. And then I brought another picture on the subject of reoccurrence. This is an 80 year old patient who had undergone breast conserving therapy 7 years previously. This means that the area of the tumor was cut out of the breast and the rest of the breast was still there. And 3 months after this so called vaccination against corona, she found a tumor in this operated breast. And it grew extremely quickly. And in the surgical preparation, it was already 55 millimeters in size. So she also had several skin metastases in her breast at the same time. This is something that is extremely rare that the patient comes with a relapse and already has skin metastases at the same time. Those normally come much later. And here you can see the current surgical preparation. The green area is the scar from the operation 7 years ago. And then this red area right next to it here, that's the tumor that's growing there. It is only very small here, but you can see this direct connection to the scar. That's why I chose this cross section. And next, I also brought a cross section to illustrate the issue of tumor heterogeneity. And this means that the tumor can be found with different growth patterns. So this material is from a 70 year old woman who had had lobular breast cancer for several years, meaning a breast cancer that grows relatively slowly. And so she had had numerous metastases in the bladder, in the intestinal mucosa, in the bones, in the liver. And she had already lived with these metastases for 3 years. In other words, her body was in a state of relative equilibrium. But shortly after this so called vaccination, the tumor growth in the liver explodes, and the patient dies within a month. And the clinician who sent me this liver cylinder, so a cylindric sample punctured out of the liver, He wrote on the submission form that he had noticed that the tumor growth had exploded in the liver, but that nothing was visible at the other metastatic sites. And here, you can see normal liver tissue on the right side and this lobular tumor in the middle. You can't actually see very much of the tumor, but what you see are small dark dots. And on the far side, the far left side, this very dark area, this is the newly added tumor with the dark core and with the rapidly growing tumor. Ultimately, I saw the correlation that the tumors appeared on the average 3 months after these so called vaccinations.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(7/57) DR. JOHN CAMPBELL, describing the work of DR. DAVID SPEICHER—“The Moderna [injection] can contain up to 10 [trillion] copies of DNA fragments per dose.” In this clip from a video posted in October 2024, Dr. John Campbell, a semi-retired nurse lecturer, describes work performed by molecular virologist Dr. David Speicher, which found that in some of the COVID injection vials, there are 10 TRILLION copies of the DNA plasmids. Campbell notes that 3 to 10 copies is “enough to cause incorporation of SV40 DNA contamination into the nuclear genome of the cell, thereby causing a mutation, which has been identified in cell cultures in chromosomes 9 and 12, including an oncogene that can potentially cause cancer.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Health Canada initially claimed the Pfizer vaccine did not contain SV40, but later acknowledged its presence, stating it has no functional role. Despite this, they sought clarification from Pfizer about the residual fragments. When asked for information, Health Canada provided redacted documents, raising questions about transparency. A technique called fluorometry, which labels DNA with fluorescent markers, revealed that some RNA vaccines, particularly Moderna's, could contain up to 10 trillion copies of DNA fragments per dose. This is concerning because just 3 to 10 copies can facilitate the incorporation of SV40 DNA into a cell's nuclear genome, potentially leading to mutations associated with cancer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Health Canada has said there's no increased risk of cancers, and they also said at first that the Pfizer vaccine does not contain SV 40, but they were wrong. It does. They later said that although the SV 40 is present, so a bit of backpedaling there from Health Canada, that, the SV 40 the the SV 40 is the the contamination sequence. One of the contamination sequences of DNA that can get back into the nuclear material of the cell and cause mutation. Health Canada says that's got no functional role. So first of all, they said it's not there, and they said, oh oh, you know what? It is there. And they said, but don't worry about it. It doesn't do anything. But then Health Canada asked Pfizer about the residual fragment. So having Health Canada declared that it does nothing, they then wrote to Pfizer. So Health Canada know that these, these this contaminating SV 40 potential cancer causing sequence is there. And then, Health Canada was asked like a freedom of information request. Health Canada was asked for this information from Pfizer, but it came back redacted. Why why would they want to hide the scientific information, Health Canada? Why would they want to do that? Now, doctor speaker uses a technique called a fluorometry. Now this basically attaches a fluorescent molecule to the DNA, and then that means when the DNA is present, you can see it with your microscope. It fluoresces, and you can you can actually see it. It's giving off light. Now this is a good technique. This fluorometry is a good technique to give quantitative analysis of all of the DNA. So it analyzes all of the DNA that's present. It's a better technique than quantitative PCR because it's analyzing all of the DNA and labeling with this fluorescent marker all of the DNA that's present. And, it's found that in some, DNA in some some RNA, vaccines, some RNA vaccines, there is 10,000,000,000,000 copies of this DNA sequence, per dose. Now I was taken aback by this. Doctor speaker was found that some, the Moderna one particularly, can contain up to 10,000,000, copies of DNA fragment per dose. And we've just said that 3 to 10 copies of s v 40 DNA fragment is enough to facilitate transport into the person's own DNA into the cellular nuclear DNA. So 3 to 10 copies per cell and up to 10,000,000,000,000 copies. So that means that potentially 1 trillion, that's a 1000,000,000,000 body cells could be transfected with foreign DNA, and and that just I was taken aback by that. So, so 10,000,000,000,000 copies of DNA contamination potentially present per dose, 3 to 10 copies enough to cause incorporation of SV40, DNA contamination into the nuclear genome of the cell thereby causing a mutation which has been identified in cell cultures in chromosomes 9 and 12 including an oncogene that can potentially cause cancer, 10,000,000,000,000 copies per dose or up to that.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(8/57) DR. ANGUS DALGLEISH (PT. 2)—“The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors…” Here is Professor Angus Dalgleish once again, this time in a clip taken from a discussion with Charles Kovess et al. from December of 2024. Dalgleish notes the following: "It's obvious talking to everybody and all the presentations I've been to....[that] they're [the COVID injections] all completely contaminated. They're just not fit for purpose," Dalgleish says. "The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors so we could pour chemotherapy into them to see if it worked for the tumors. And we are putting this into humans for a disease that hasn't killed anybody for at least two years. It is beyond belief, and that's really what I cannot understand."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The recent discussions in Australia highlight serious concerns about messenger RNA vaccines, particularly those from Pfizer, which are reportedly contaminated with SV 40, a substance previously used in animal studies for tumor growth. This raises alarming questions about their safety, especially since COVID-19 hasn't posed a significant threat in over two years. Additionally, a deal between the Australian Prime Minister and Moderna for a ten-year supply of vaccines, costing 2 billion Australian dollars and intended for children, is particularly troubling. The implications of using gene therapy in this manner are deeply concerning, and there is a call for accountability from those behind these vaccine manufacturers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's obvious talking to everybody and all the presentations I've been to Australia and since I've come back and that magnificent, that Perth conference, with the, the the debate with the, premier of Western Australia and the head of the medicine there who didn't turn up to the debate and which I thought was was a very funny thing, but they got all the evidence that the messenger RNA vaccines there, they're all completely contaminated. They are just not fit for purpose. The Pfizer's are all full of SV 40. SV 40 was what in in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors so we could pour chemotherapy into them to see if it worked for the tumors. And we are putting this into humans for a disease that hasn't killed anybody for at least 2 years. It is beyond belief, and that's really what I cannot understand. Now today, I got sent something from Australia, which and I must say it's the closest I have to being holding my stomach and being sick. It was, Arace Morrison, the prime minister, doing a deal with Moderna for messenger RNA vaccines for the next 10 years that you will buy 2,000,000,000 Australian dollars of these vaccines off the next 10 years, and they will target all sorts of diseases, and they will be given to children. This is a a gene therapy that they didn't. How much were they bribed to do that because I must say, if I was given a $1,000,000,000 to do this and it meant it going into children, I would walk away even if it was 10,000,000. To me, it's beyond belief that you would even consider it. These people behind Moderna and Pfizer are just pure pure evil, and they must be held to account.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(9/57) DR. SUCHARIT BHAKDI—“The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately.” Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes in this clip taken from a conversation with Children’s Health Defense from May 2023 how the integration of foreign genes into a person’s genome can lead to cancer. Bhakdi notes that mRNA injections cause this type of damage because “the [DNA] plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells, and…every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Integrating foreign genes into chromosomes can lead to cancer, inflammation, and permanent genetic changes passed to offspring. This is a warning about the dangers posed by RNA vaccines being introduced globally by organizations like the WHO, CDC, and FDA. The initial vaccines are already causing harm due to the introduction of foreign genes into the body. The production of mRNA does not ensure that these bacterial genes will not enter human cells, resulting in genetic alteration. Every genetically altered cell faces dire consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately, can cause all sorts of inflammation, and moreover, will cause this gene to be transmitted to your offspring. You will be genetically transformed forever. This is not a hate speech. This is a speech to make everyone wake up and see the dangers that they are facing because the WHO and the CDC and the FDA and all these guys up there are planning to introduce RNA vaccines worldwide everywhere and the first have already been introduced and they are causing the same damage that all the others are going to cause because a foreign gene is entering your body and because the production of this mRNA will never never guarantee that plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells and what this means is that all humans who are injected with these bacterial plasmids or genes are genetically altered. And every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(10/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 2)—“This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact…[and] it’s the most cited gene in cancer.” In this clip from an interview Kevin McKernan did with Bret Weinstein, he notes that the SV40—which has been firmly established as being present in the DNA plasmid contamination in the COVID injections—interacts with P53, a gene that is commonly referred to as “the guardian of the genome.” “This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact,” McKernan says. “And now we have billions of these molecules being injected that we know interact with that.” Furthermore, McKernan adds that P53 is “the most cited gene in cancer,” and “if you mess with P53, you’re inviting cancer, particularly if you shut it down.” The scientist also notes that simply having fragmented DNA inside the cytosol of cells—that is, the liquid portion of the cytoplasm within a cell, where many biochemical reactions occur—is enough to cause cancer; meaning the DNA doesn’t even need to be imported into the nucleus of the cell. “It [the plasmids] doesn’t have to get into the nucleus to cause cancer. Just cytosolic presence of DNA like this can trigger this cGAS STING pathway,” McKernan notes. (The cGAS-STING pathway is an innate immune signaling route that detects cytosolic DNA to trigger an immune response, including inflammation and an antiviral defense.)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The SV40 component, highlighted by David Dean and others, interacts with p53, known as the "guardian of the genome," crucial for maintaining DNA integrity. The introduction of billions of these molecules raises concerns about their effects, especially since they bind to p53. Research from the Brown Cancer Institute suggests that the spike protein may alter p53 transcription, potentially leading to cancer if p53 is compromised. Damaged DNA fragments can trigger the cGAS-STING pathway, signaling danger within cells and potentially leading to oncogenesis. There is skepticism about whether this DNA enters the nucleus, but even its presence in the cytosol can be harmful. Observations of rare cancers in vaccinated children, particularly blood cancers like lymphoma, raise alarms about these potential risks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This SV 40 component, that David Dean has published on being a gene therapy tool, it's also been published by David, I'm sorry, by Draymond et al, which, shows that it interacts with p 53. So p 53 is this guardian of the genome that's supposed to keep our genome intact. And now we have billions of these molecules being injected that we don't interact with that. Now we don't know what it does from the literature that's out there today. We just know that it it binds to p 53. We have, Walthak Aldeyary's work out of the Brown Cancer Institute showing that the spike protein itself may alter the the transcription of p 53. So there's a couple You wanna describe what p53 is when you say guardian of the genome? Yeah. So this is probably the most cited gene in cancer. And if you mess with p53, you're inviting cancer, particularly if you shut it down. This clean this mops up DNA that's been damaged. And now you're you're you're injecting your cells with these, shreds shrapnel DNA that that triggers that pathway. That triggers what's known as a c gas sting pathway, which is a pathway that when it sees broken DNA like that, interferon goes off being like there's something wrong here. We shouldn't have fragmented DNA inside the cytosol or in the nucleus. And that that pathway alone, if you trigger enough repeatedly, can lead to oncogenesis. So there there is a lot of, debunkers out there that try to say you can't prove this DNA is getting into the nucleus based on David Dean's work. We it doesn't have to get into the nucleus to cause cancer. It's just cytosolic presence of fragments of DNA like this can trigger this, cGAST thing pathway. So I've been trying to turn people's attention to cancer mainly because I'm seeing it. I I know kids that shouldn't have cancer because they got vaccinated. And, these are these are very rare cancers that you don't find in children, that are showing up for in close proximity to to usually blood cancers like lymphoma.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(11/57) DR. JANCI LINDSAY— “LNPs have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to more readily spread by inducing endothelial leakiness.” In this clip from a presentation given for the World Council for Health, posted in 2023, toxicologist and molecular biologist Dr. Janci Linsday describes the nine (or more) ways the mRNA COVID injections can cause cancer. In her presentation, Lindsay notes that: –the injections use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to spread more readily –the LNPs may be oncogenic by themselves –the SV40 is a “super promoter” that is “great at driving gene expression,” and should it sit above an oncogene, you could have “an amplification of a cancer gene.” –the spike protein can interact with, and suppress, P53, the aforementioned “guardian of the genome.” –the injections can produce “frame shifted” proteins, which are aberrant and can themselves cause cancer –the mRNA in the injections itself can reverse transcribe into the genome, in turn causing insertional mutagenesis and cancer –the injections cause immunosuppression of T cells, which, in turn, can damage the immune system and lead to cancer (as previously mentioned in the thread)

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are several potential ways that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and mRNA can induce cancer. LNPs can transfect various cells, including hematopoietic stem cells, and may promote the spread of existing cancer cells. The SV40 elements in plasmids can drive gene expression, potentially amplifying oncogenes. The spike protein can inhibit tumor suppressor protein p53, and insertional mutagenesis can create aberrant proteins leading to cancer. mRNA can reverse transcribe to DNA, integrating into the genome, particularly in the ovaries and testes. Immunosuppression of T cells can allow cancer to expand. Concerns exist about the potential for genetic vaccines to be passed to offspring through germ cells, but this has not been adequately investigated. Integration into gametes could lead to genomic changes, raising the risk of cancer rather than functional integration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the 9 potential ways to induce cancer or more, 1, the lipid nanoparticles themselves can take mRNA and DNA to all cells. And they've been shown to readily transfect hematopoietic stem cells. LNPs have also been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to more readily spread by inducing endothelial leakiness. There may also be an oncogenic effect of the LMPs themselves, which has not yet been studied. As Kevin said, there are s v 40 elements to the plasmids. This is extremely concerning, particularly because they were not disclosed to regulators. So the s p 40 promoter is very promiscuous. It's a super promoter. It's it's great at driving gene expression. If and if that should sit above an oncogene, of course, you could have, an an explosion of an ample amplification in a cancer gene. The s v forty enhancer region, the nuclear targeting sequence, as Kevin described, also takes the DNA to the nucleus within a very short time period. It is designed to do that so that you get effective, gene therapy, gene, insertional, gene therapy. So the spike protein itself, can also interact with and inhibit the tumor suppressor protein p53 that was shown pretty early on. And then plasma DNA does not need to have the SV 40 sequences in order to, be able to cause insertional mutagenesis and to go to the nucleus. There are lots of proteins that assist in carrying and binding to and carrying that exogenous DNA to the nucleus where it can then be integrated. So insertional metagenesis can cause something called frameshift mutations, which also lead to aberrant proteins being made. Those aberrant proteins can also lead to cancer. MRNA itself can be reverse transcribed to DNA, and then also integrate in the genome, which causes cancers. And this is particularly true in the ovaries and the testes where line 1 is more, reverse transcriptase is more constitutively expressed. So that's a real concern there. RNA, through through a mechanism that I'll go through, coming up, can also be reverse transcribed to DNA and then that DNA back to RNA and then to cDNA, and and then be passed on. There's another mechanism called or there's another mechanism through which these could cause cancer, and that is through immunosuppression of t cells of the t cells, particularly, t cells that that keep cancer from expanding, in these stoichiometric niches where where they guard the cancer clone and keep it from expanding. We see this in our pets as they grow older, that once we have immunosensis and thymic involution, then you see an explosion in these sarcomas and lipomas and other cancers because of this, these T cells not being present to stop clonal expansion. So, there are different types of genetic mutations. There's somatic mutations, which only affect, the cells outside of the gametes. And then there's germline mutations, which affect the gametes. Now, here it says that a somatic mutation cannot result in a hereditary in hereditary passing on. But there is a mechanism through which you can have extra chromosomally passed genetic elements, be passed through sperm. And it is a very interesting mechanism of epigenetic regulation. And that is called sperm mediated gene transfer. Trying to make sure I don't go over here. So, ways to pass on genetic vaccines to progeny through both male and female germ cells. I spoke a little bit about this in, December of 2/22 at the US Senate. My my very large concern that these gene therapies will be passed on to our progeny and will contaminate the gene pool. And this is not being investigated at all. Not a single person has investigated sperm or ova to see if these are being genetically integrated. And I have reached out to multiple labs asking them if they would investigate this. We have an in vitro lab that is willing to work with anyone who, is willing to test both Sperminova for, for integration. So, in the first, you can have integration into the genome directly of gametes, from the DNA based vaccines or through reverse transcription of RNA, into the coding DNA. And, of course, the DNA plasmid sequences then make that possible as well. We know that these go to the testes and ovaries, and we know that they can be taken up there, and and integrated into the gametes. Genomic integration could result in cancers rather than just, functional integration. In fact, it's it's unlikely that we will have functional integration, into the genome creating a spike protein, but more likely that you'll have insertable mutagenesis leading to cancer.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(12/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 3)—“We have sequencing from a colon [tumor] biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated…we can find [Pfizer-injection DNA] plasmids in there at a hundred copies per cell.” In this clip from a 2024 Mind & Matter podcast, we hear again from scientist Kevin McKernan, who describes finding the DNA plasmids from Pfizer’s mRNA COVID injection in a colon tumor from a—now deceased—individual who received four injections. ​​”We have sequencing from a colon biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated. A year after vaccination, they had a colon cancer. They biopsied it that day, and then 30 days later, they died, and then they biopsied after, and we have sequencing on both the pre-mortem and post-mortem samples," McKernan says. The scientist and entrepreneur, often cited as the first person to find DNA contamination in the mRNA COVID injections, adds, "we can find plasmids in there a hundred copies per cell. They're not exactly the same as Pfizer's, which is a real head-scratcher, but they're in there." McKernan goes on to say: “The copy number alone suggests that these things aren't fully fragmented. Right? These plasmids really shouldn't be replicating to a hundred copies per cell." McKernan adds, "They shouldn't be in there at that level because if you just do the math on how much is in the vaccine, when you do an injection of this, this person has four vaccines...1.2 ml of Pfizer...went into about 87,000 mls [of] body volume. So you should have a massive dilution into your body. Yet when we're sequencing this and doing qPCR off the tumor, the CTs coming back off the tumor are almost as high as they are straight out of the vial."

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have sequenced samples from a colon biopsy of a patient who was vaccinated four times and developed colon cancer a year later. The sequencing revealed plasmids, with about 100 copies per cell, which differ from Pfizer's. This raises questions about potential variations in manufacturing or contamination. Preliminary data suggests these plasmids may integrate into the genome, with one integration observed on chromosome 21 affecting a cancer-related gene. The high copy number indicates replication, as the expected dilution from vaccination would not account for such levels. The formalin-fixed tissue confirms these plasmids were present while the patient was alive, but the source remains unknown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have done that. We haven't published the work yet, but we have sequencing from a colon, a colon biopsy from a patient who was 4 times vaccinated. A year after vaccination, they had a colon cancer. They biopsied it that day, and then 30 days later, they died, and then they biopsied after. And we have sequencing on both the the pre mortem and post mortem samples. And we can find plasmids in there a 100 copies per cell. They're they're not exactly the same as Pfizer's, which is a real head scratcher, but they're in there. And there's 2 of them. And there's there's a one encodes spike and one encodes nucleocapsid. We don't know why where the hell the nucleocapsid ones come from. Speaker 1: But if they got there from a Pfizer vaccination, why would the plasma be different than the Pfizer plasmid? Speaker 0: So that's a good question. Is do they have more than 1 in circulation? Like, is BioNTech got a different manufacturing plasmid than than the manufacturing plant out here in the US? Because they're making these in 2 different locations. Yep. It's possible. Is there contamination in their laboratory that, in the manufacturing of this, they get the wrong plasmid in their Erykolai pad, and suddenly they've got a different background there. Is there this possibility from the Beck paper I described in Seattle? Is that in play? And we've gotta do everything in our end to make sure we didn't introduce it, which we're doing. We're running all types of experiments to show that there's spike expression going on. Speaker 1: But there's any there's any number of reasons that could explain this. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. Yeah. So, but we also have data preliminarily back that's looking we run this program called ISLING. It's a really cool program that that's designed to look for vector integration into genomes, because they have to do this for a lot of gene therapy projects. And if you run that that program on on the on the sample, it does pop out a lot of integration events that we're now in the process of saying about verifying just to confirm that they're real. Speaker 1: So you guys are looking at and confirming whether these DNA plasmids are actually not only getting into human cells, but integrating into the nuclear genome. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. So we've got, you know, we've got a case now that that we're zeroing in on that looks like the SV 40 poly a signal, which is a termination signal. It's a transcription termination signal. We've got a piece of that integrating into chromosome 21, and it's breaking a gene that's involved in cancer. So, that that that one looks really interesting. Like, that could be maybe the driver of this whole thing. But the the program spits out a long list of potential integrations that we have to go through and and verify which ones are real and which ones are artifacts and all that. So I I wanna get ahead of ourselves on that. That's that hasn't been saying or verified yet. But, there the copy number alone is, suggests that these things aren't fully fragmented. Right? That these these plasmas really shouldn't be replicating to a 100 copies per cell. They couldn't they shouldn't be in there at that level, because if you just do the math on how much is in the vaccine Mhmm. After when you do an injection of of this this person has 4 vaccines, so 1.2 ml of Pfizer. That went into about 87,000 ml as your body volume. So you should have a massive dilution into your body. Yet when we're sequencing this and doing qPCR off the tumor, the CTs coming back off the tumor are almost as high as they are straight out of the vial. Yeah. Speaker 1: So basically what you're saying is in this case where you've got these biopsied cells from a tumor, you're finding on the order of a 100 copies of this DNA plasmid per cell. And in theory, if it is coming if the if you're just sort of injecting some with a jab, it's got these DNA contaminants, you should find many fewer than a 100 copies of plasmid per cell that's coming directly from the jab. So and so I think what you're implying is that this high number, a 100 or so per cell, implies that perhaps the cell itself replicated multiple copies of these. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. And I and even if it were an integration event, which I I do think there could be 2 things going on here. There there could be plasmids replicating episomally, and there could be parts of them integrated. But if it were purely integrated and the plasma was gone, we would not expect to see the copy number of what integrated to be higher than the copy number of the genome. Right? You'd get one integration into 1 chromosome probably, so it would be half the signal of what you get amplifying a human house gene like RNA p, which is what we use. You would get, you know, a similar CT if it integrated, because because if it were driver mutation, the the cells would take off, and it would maybe have one copy of that mutation with it. And as a tumor advanced, you would probably you expect to see a CT score in PCR for that region that was similar to the actual genome background, but we're not seeing that. We're seeing CTs that are that are way ahead. You know, if it's a 100 fold up there, it's around 6 to 7 CTs ahead of the RNA p gene, which is the human gene. And then when we do sequencing, we see the same thing. The coverage of sequencing is, like, 100 to 200 x in the plasmid is that when we're at 1x of the human genome. So they're they're in this tumor at really high levels, and that that tells us that it has to be replicating. And this was a formalin fixed tissue, so like it's not like we could sprinkle plasmids on it from our laboratory to contaminate that and have them be trans translationally active. Right? Yeah. Formalin is like this process when you take a tissue and you formalin fix it. It's like think of it as like carbon freezing Han Solo. Right. Right. Right. A nerd. Alright? So you can't add plasmid after the fact and get it to replicate on cells, and you can't add plasmids on the fact afterwards and get it to integrate. Like, the the those those things can only occur if the cells are live. So we're pretty certain we've we've ruled out that, alright, this isn't coming from us. The anti vaxxers aren't pouring plasmids on this great story. Okay? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: This is this was this has this has certain biological signals that show this this was present in the patient when they were alive. We don't know the source of it. They were 4 times vaccinated, and one of the vaccines that they used, was one of the earliest vaccines from December 30, 2020.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(13/57) RETIRED PHARMA R&D EXECUTIVE SASHA LATYPOVA— “The FDA was fully aware that these things would cause cancer because they’ve written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that’s how they regulate industry.” In this clip from an interview with Dr. Drew from 2024, retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova describes how the "FDA was fully aware that these things [the COVID injections] would cause cancer, because they've written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that's how they regulate industry.” Latypova notes that in “2015, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products that they need to study...cancer..." "They had this knowledge and they told manufacturers you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them and they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical," Latypova adds. "It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020 [and] all of the sudden all of this is solved—this is a joke. To me, that's where I became extremely suspicious..." One such FDA guidance document referenced by Latypova is linked in tweet 39 of this mega-thread.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently met someone whose 18-year-old daughter developed cancer after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. I've heard from many parents who lost children to these injections, some experiencing immediate and horrific deaths. They repeatedly share their stories with lawmakers, highlighting a significant crime that must end. The FDA was aware of the potential cancer risks associated with these vaccines, as outlined in guidance documents from 2013 and 2015. These documents instructed manufacturers to study risks like cancer, fertility issues, and cardiovascular problems, and deemed it unethical to test on healthy volunteers. Yet, by 2020, these concerns were seemingly overlooked. This raises serious suspicions about the intentions behind the vaccine rollout, suggesting a premeditated crime where regulators and the military may have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just had a guest in my house whose 18 year old daughter was injected with Pfizer, and she has cancer. I sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections. Some died immediately. Some deaths were gruesome. And these people have to go and testify to lawmakers and anybody who would listen and recount the story over and over and over again. And this is a a massive, massive crime, and it needs to stop. Now FDA was fully aware that these things will cause cancer because they've written numerous guidance documents. That's how they regulate industry. So even in 2015, and I read those guidance documents, 2015, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to the manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products That they need to study, especially cancer, that these products can cause death, that these products can cause fertility issues, blindness, strokes, cardiovascular issues, all of that is written because that's called regulatory knowledge. They have this knowledge. And they told manufacturers, you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them. And they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical. It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020, all of a sudden all of this is solved. This is a joke, okay? So to me, that's where I became extremely suspicious and started looking into it for myself. But that's what I'm telling you. It's a premeditated crime, regulators knew, and the military conducted this fake exercise to capture all these pharma companies and make them make these weapons.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(14/57) DR. JAMES ROYLE— “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based–injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers.” In this 2024 presentation for the Stone Summit, U.K.-based surgeon Dr. James Royle describes seeing the same kinds of phenomena regarding turbo cancers as described by Professor Angus Dalgleish, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Ute Krüger, et al. He also notes that the excuses for these cancers that have been used to deflect away from the COVID injections as the cause don’t make any logical sense. “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene-based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers,” Royle says. “These cancers have been termed colloquially ‘turbo cancers.’ Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians…There was [also] a clear, dramatic increase [in cancer rates] that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout.” Royle goes on to note the following: “A robust study recently published from Japan now [retracted] by the journal after significant pressure showed cancer-related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, [and in] 2022, [a] 7.9% increase.” The surgeon adds: “I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I'd considered cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out-of-the-blue aggressive stage IV colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large, round tumor masses.” The prominent surgeon notes that “many of [his] multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses have all acknowledged… [a] sudden change in patterns and [a] dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers…observed in these past two years. However, none of them can offer an explanation.” “This post-2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population-wide change in environmental toxins,” Royle notes. “Ultra-processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID-19,” the surgeon adds. “In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping [cancer] screening given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years [of age].”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a concerning rise in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbocancers," particularly after the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. This increase is observed across all age groups, with a notable spike in younger patients. The aggressive nature of these cancers is unusual, especially in elderly patients who typically present with operable stages. Various explanations, such as lifestyle factors and delayed diagnoses due to lockdowns, do not account for the sudden changes seen post-2021. A correlation exists between the vaccine rollout and the rise in cancer cases, suggesting potential mechanisms related to immunosuppression and other biological disruptions. Despite reporting these observations, feedback from health authorities has been minimal. Many healthcare professionals share similar concerns but hesitate to voice them due to fear of repercussions. There is a growing consensus that the vaccines may not be safe or effective, and calls for their cessation are increasing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Finally, I need to talk about cancer, particularly colorectal cancers. In addition to the increase in all cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers. These cancers have been termed colloquially turbocancers. Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians. Despite recent articles claiming that the sudden growth in cancers is not new, such as the Gaslighting article in the Daily Mail reporting on a baffling increase in trend in data from 1990 to 2019. There was a clear dramatic increase that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout. A robust study recently published from Japan, now redacted by the journal after significant pressure, showed cancer related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, 5.6% increase, 2022, a 7.9% increase. I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I consider cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out of the blue aggressive stage 4 colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large round tumor masses. It is horrific to see on a weekly basis in IMBT. In my experience, it is rare for colorectal cancer to be as aggressive in elderly. Usually, sporadic cancers that are diagnosed are still operable when they present. Elderly patients rarely present with stage IV disease and certainly not in the way I've started seeing. Recently, we've seen 3 patients presenting with synchronous cancers, that is 2 separate bowel cancers in different areas of the colon presenting at the same time. This was previously considered rare, less than 3%. 1 of 1 was middle aged, otherwise fit well with 2 bulky, locally invasive cancers, and one was very elderly with 2 primary cancers and liver metastases. Many of my multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and specialist nurses, have all acknowledged to me the sudden change in patterns and dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers that we've observed in these past 2 years. However, none of them can offer an explanation. Various theories have been suggested. So what then is causing the sudden increased incidence in the other 92% that we're seeing? Number 2, Western ultra processed diet obesity and sedentary lifestyles. Whilst these things have undoubtedly played a major role in the steady increase in cancer over the past 3 to 4 decades, they do not explain the post 2021 sudden increase and change in biology, aggressive nature. This post 2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population wide change in environmental toxins. Ultra processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID 19. Number 3, lockdowns causing delayed diagnosis and suspended cancer screening programs. The post 2021 surge in aggressive cancers in all ages cannot be blamed on lockdown and delayed diagnosis. As I showed earlier, during the 19 the COVID 19 pandemic, we did not stop our 2 week wait for colorectal pathways. We diagnosed and treated more rather than fewer cancers during lockdown as the only pathway that GPs can access. Therefore, this argument of stage migration or missed or delayed diagnosis does not hold true for colorectal cancer. Furthermore, colorectal screening services were only stopped for a few months of the first and second wave. In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping screening, given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years. Number 4, there's a close temporal association of the increasing cancers and the rollout of population wide mRNA COVID 19 genetic injections. The evident correlation fulfills the majority of the 9 Bradford Hill epidemiological criteria for causation. There are multiple plausible mechanisms that have been proposed by which cancer could be induced or potentiated, accelerated by the mRNA gene injections, including unacceptably high levels of bacterial plasmid contamination, the discovery of the SV40 tumor promoter, disruption of the p53 tumor suppressor, etcetera. These mechanisms are discussed widely by scientists and clinicians, such as doctor Kevin McKernan, professor Angliss Douglies, doctor William Mackis, and doctor Ryan Cole, a US pathologist, and many others and have been discussed on numerous international calls. More generally, the shots are clearly causing generalized immunosuppression. The immune system is grossly underestimated its complexity and importance in tumor surveillance in destroying mutated cells before they become cancers. Recently, other doctors have told me how they are seeing sudden recurrences of cancers that have been cured 10 or even 15 years earlier. I submitted over 20 yellow cards from June 2021. I could have submitted many more, but it was becoming very apparent that the MHRA was ignoring the data. I've never been given any feedback on any analysis of my cases or even acknowledgment, except the 2 or 3 cases where further clarifying information that I'd already provided was requested. I was given no information back from the MHRA to indicate that they were looking at yellow card data or analyzing it. Despite this, the safety signal from both the MHRA and the VAERS system in the United States is unprecedented and undeniably obvious. Presenting this information formally, I've received mixed responses. More recently, in my more departmental morbidity and mortality meetings, there's been a more open acknowledgment that perhaps some observed events, such as ischemic bowel cases, may have been related to vaccines. I've had a number of conversations with 2 colorectal colleagues in other areas of the country who've had similar shared experiences. They're in agreement with the observed patterns of thrombotic, infective and inflammatory, and malignant disease. I've had the opportunity to give a presentation to an international surgical meeting in London in March 2023. At the end, I was congratulated on my perceived courage in standing up and speaking about these concerns. There was general agreement in the room, 30 or more surgeons. Many offered acknowledgment and similar observations, but had been unwilling to raise their concerns for fear of repercussions. In fact, a rather alarmed, eminent, retired surgeon present stated it was our duty to raise these concerns. In conclusion, the data are clear that COVID 19 vaccines are neither effective or safe. My own personal observations have been increasingly backed up by other data around the world and research studies as well as expert opinion in other centers. I personally demand that these injections and any promotion of them be stopped with immediate effect. Thank you for your attention.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(15/57) DR. WILLIAM MAKIS— “Once the vaccines roll out in 2021, you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then…there’s some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” In this clip from a discussion with pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas, oncologist, radiologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis describes some of the work that’s been done by The Ethical Skeptic on cancer trends following the rollout of the COVID injections. Makis notes that there was a “statistically significant rise in cancer” in the U.S. following the rollout of the COVID injections. Furthermore, he says that the injections cause “some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” "I love the work of Ethical Skeptic, and this is his work," Makis says of the graph he presents for Thomas. "This is a data analyst on X...and he looks at CDC data, and he finds these trends that are really fascinating." "These are deaths from malignant neoplasms in...a younger cohort, ages 0 to 54," Makis says. "And you see that really, in 2020, you don't see much in terms of a [rise in] cancer. There seems to be a slight blip above trend line, but it's sort of still hovering around a long-term trend line. And then once the vaccines roll out in 2021, then you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then." Ethical Skeptic "calls it a 12-sigma event, which is...I'm not even gonna try to describe what that means, how astronomically unlikely this is to be a sort of a random thing or a coincidence," Makis says. "This is a very real trend. I'm seeing it in thousands and thousands of young people," the cancer researcher adds. "And what's shocking and what's particularly concerning about this graph—and I really want people to pay attention to this—is that people stopped taking booster shots. People have, by and large, stopped taking booster shots. But the trend continues. And it's a very steady upward trend. There's no sign of it leveling off or stopping, or reversing. And this has me really, really concerned for the long term." Makis goes on to say: "Initially, I started seeing these patterns...Someone would take a COVID vaccine and then they would be diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer out of the blue four months later, six months later. And I thought, 'Okay. Well, maybe there's a pattern here. Maybe there's a sort of a certain time that's required for cancer to develop.' And through my research, I found, for example, that there is a shift in the type of antibodies that we produce. It's called the IgG4 shift. And IgG4 antibodies start being produced once you've been exposed to multiple shots, once you've had at least two COVID vaccines. And these are called tolerance antibodies. This is where your...immune system starts tolerating the antigen, which is the spike protein; but it also starts tolerating cancer and cancer cells. And that takes a few months. That whole shift takes several months to happen. "But then I start[ed] seeing cases where the young person hasn't taken a shot in the last two years, then they're just suddenly diagnosed with an aggressive stage 4 cancer that behaves the way these mRNA vaccine–induced turbo cancers are behaving, and they [the patients] have a very, very poor prognosis. They don't respond to chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even immunotherapy, and then they die approximately six to 12 months after diagnosis. So there is a long-term effect, and that is the one thing that really has me concerned...that there is something that happens to people who've had the vaccines that is permanent. There's some kind of damage that appears to be permanent, and it can manifest years after you've had your last COVID vaccines. And this is really, really, concerning for me."

Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent analysis of CDC data shows a concerning trend in cancer deaths among individuals aged 0 to 54. Before 2020, cancer rates were stable, but after the rollout of COVID vaccines in 2021, there has been a statistically significant rise in cancer cases each year. This trend persists despite a decrease in booster vaccinations, suggesting potential long-term effects from the initial vaccines. Observations indicate that some individuals develop aggressive stage 4 cancers months after vaccination, with poor responses to treatment. Research indicates a shift in antibody production, which may lead to the immune system tolerating both the spike protein and cancer cells. This raises concerns about permanent damage from the vaccines that could manifest years later.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have an, slide, I believe, that shows the trend in cancer. We maybe we should put that up, and then you can kind of share with our audience, what you're seeing here on this on this image. Speaker 1: You know, this is I love the work of ethical skeptic, and and this is, his work. This is a data analyst, on on x on Twitter, and he looks at CDC data, and and he he finds these these trends that are really fascinating. And and so he had released, his analysis recently about cancer. He puts this out every couple of months. And this is the trend that he's put out. These are deaths from malignant neoplasms and younger this is a younger cohort, ages 0 to 54. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And and you see that really in 2020, you don't see much in terms of a can a rising cancer. There seems to be a slight blip above, you know, trend line, but it's sort of it's still hovering around a long term trend line. And then once the vaccines roll out in 2021, then you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then. I mean and he calls it a 12 sigma event, which is, you know, I mean, I'm not even gonna try to describe what, you know, what that means, how astronomically unlikely this is to be a sort of a random thing or or a coincidence. This is a very real trend. I'm seeing it in 1,000 and 1,000 of of young people. And and what's what's shocking and what's particularly concerning about this graph, and I really, you know, want people to pay attention to this, is that people stop taking booster shots. People have, by and large, stopped taking Right. Speaker 0: But the trend continues. Speaker 1: But the trend continues. And it's a very steady upward trend. There's no sign of it leveling off or stopping, or reversing. And this has me really, really concerned, for the long term. Speaker 0: Yeah. That point you just made to me means and correct me if I'm wrong. I'm just sort of thinking it through. A lot of people aren't taking the boosters anymore. So the risk has to have come from the prior vaccines they got, maybe even 2, 3 years ago, speaking to speaking to the fact that it has perhaps permanently harmed our immune systems, those those people who have taken those jabs. Speaker 1: Exactly. And so initially, I started seeing these patterns. You know? Someone would take a COVID vaccine, and then they would be diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer out of the blue 4 months later, 6 months later. And I thought, okay, well maybe there's a pattern here. Maybe there's a sort of a certain time that's required for cancer to develop. And and, you know, through my research, I found, for example, that there is a shift in the type of antibodies that we produce. It's called the IgG4 shift. And, you know, IgG4 antibodies start being produced once you've been exposed to multiple shots, once you've had at least 2 COVID vaccines. And these are called tolerance antibodies. This is where your body starts the immune system starts tolerating the antigen, which is, you know, the the spike protein, but it also starts tolerating cancer and cancer cells. And that takes a few months. That whole shift, you know, takes several months to to happen. But then, you know, I start seeing also cases where the young person hasn't taken a shot in the last 2 years. Then they're, you know, just suddenly diagnosed with an aggressive stage 4 cancer that behaves the way these mRNA vaccine induced turbocancers are behaving and they have a very, very poor prognosis. They don't respond to chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even immunotherapy and then they die approximately 6 to 12 months after diagnosis. So there is a long term effect. And that is the one that really has me concerned is that there is something that happens to people who've had the vaccines that is permanent. There's some kind of damage that appears to be permanent, and and it can manifest years after you've had your last COVID vaccines and and this is really really concerning for me.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(16/57) DR. CHARLES HOFFE—“In my practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses—since the vax rollout—are stage 4.” Topping off the first section of this turbo cancer mega-thread, which features expert testimonials from around the Western world, we have a clip of family physician Dr. Charles Hoffe speaking on turbo cancers during a 2022 Children’s Health Defense virtual roundtable. Hoffe, who has more than 30 years of experience as a family physician, notes that “as a family doctor, over the years, a small percentage of the new cancer diagnoses would unfortunately be stage 4 at first diagnosis. But in [his] practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses since the vax rollout are stage 4.” Hoffe notes, “pathologists around the world have noticed this—that, unfortunately, now people who had previous cancers, which were in remission, are flaring up since their shots because of the damage to their immune system by the COVID shots. [And with] new cancers being diagnosed, the tumors are bigger than ever. They seem to grow very aggressively, spread very aggressively, and be very resistant to treatment. So this has been nicknamed turbo cancer.” The veteran family physician goes on to describe one such case of turbo cancer he’s seen in a man who was mandated to get a COVID injection in order to keep his job. Hoffe shows how the man, a 61-year-old machine operator, developed a grapefruit-sized tumor in his lungs within months of getting his COVID injection. He also developed other tumors, including ones that grew along the vertebrae of his spine. Hoffe notes that the prognosis at the time was that the man would almost certainly die due to the aggressive cancers.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cancer cases are increasingly being diagnosed at advanced stages, with many patients presenting with stage 4 cancers since the COVID vaccine rollout. One patient, a 61-year-old machine operator, experienced severe shortness of breath after receiving his second vaccine dose. Initially, his chest x-ray was normal, but by September, he developed back pain and underwent further imaging, revealing a grapefruit-sized tumor in his chest and another tumor near his lumbar vertebra. This rapid progression of aggressive tumors, referred to as "turbo cancer," highlights the alarming trend of aggressive cancer growth post-vaccination. Tragically, the patient’s prognosis is very poor, raising concerns about the impact of the vaccines on immune health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, what we're seeing is also that people are starting to talk about the cancers which are appearing. Doctors are seeing them and also the the number of, of cases of cancer which, you know, are much advanced when they're first recognized and also they have distant spread. It's quite remarkable. Charles, are you seeing something like this in your practice? Speaker 1: Yeah. I in fact, I wanted to talk about one of my own patients. You know, it's it's it's fascinating as a as a family doctor, over the years, a small percentage of the new cancer diagnoses would unfortunately be stage 4 at first diagnosis. But in my practice now, it's approximately 2 thirds of all cancer diagnoses since the vax rollout, are stage 4. And so, you know, pathologists around the world have noticed this that unfortunately now people who had previous cancers which were in remission are flaring up since their shots because of the damage to their immune system by the COVID shots. But new cancers being diagnosed, the tumors are bigger than ever. They seem to grow very aggressively, spread very aggressively and be very resistant to treatment. So this has been nicknamed turbo cancer. So I wanted to just do a quick presentation of a gentleman who's been a patient of mine for about 20 years. So this gentleman is a 61 year old machine operator who was mandated to have the shots for his work. And so November last year, he had a second shot. After that, he complained to me that he was just out of breath, all the time. Just really felt short of breath. Couldn't do what he used to be able to do. I assumed he probably had micro clotting either in his lungs or his heart. So anyway, in December of last year, he was sent off for a chest x-ray, to investigate it. And so the slide on the left is his chest x-ray from December of last year which was completely normal. So then you'll see that this is the progression of events. This year, in September of this year, he started to develop a low back pain that radiated down into his thigh and his buttock that seemed like sciatica. And, he eventually got bad enough that he went into an ER where he had a chest x-ray and a CT scan. So as you remember, he had a normal chest x-ray 1 month after his COVID shot. The chest x-ray on the right hand side which you can you might be able to see, he has got literally a grapefruit sized tumor in the center of his chest. So you can see it right in compare the size, you can see the lung on the left side in the left x-ray, you can see that's what a right lung should look like. Now obviously the patient's right lung is on our left because they're facing us. And so you can see the two lobes of that lung are collapsed and how much smaller that lung is. But he literally has a 4 inch diameter tumor that's displacing his trachea right in the center of his chest that has grown since his first x-ray, which was 10 months before. Now this is astonishing for a primary tumor to grow from being invisible 10 months ago to literally 4 inches or 10 centimeters in diameter in that space of time. Now his back pain was being caused by a secondary which was his first symptoms. He had a 2 and a half inch diameter, a 6 centimeter diameter tumor adjacent to his 4th lumbar vertebra, which was impinging on the nerves and causing his back pain and had caused collapse of that vertebra. So this is a real case of turbocancer tragically in this patient who was mandated to have these shots in order to keep his job and unfortunately now I don't think his chances of surviving this are pretty close to 0. This is a highly aggressive cancer. So this is tragic. It is absolutely tragic. The people were were given these shots to keep them safe and and it is just devastating what this is doing.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(17/57) DR. MICHAEL HUANG—“The clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians…in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that.” Starting off our testimonies portion of this turbo-cancer mega-thread, we have Dr. Michael Huang, a family medicine physician in California, describing during a 2024 conversation with Charles Kovess, et al. how he started to see aggressive cancers crop up in his colleagues following the rollout of the COVID injections. Huang tells Kovess, et al.: “I have seen what has happened when my friends have taken the shots. I used to work at Kaiser. It's a large management group. And the clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians. And, you know, physicians, we are usually trying to stay healthy, trying to avoid harms. We don't smoke. We don't drink. And, unfortunately, in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that. Almost monthly, I will hear about one or two physicians [who] die suddenly. And most recently, we know this family practice resident who's in his thirties. We have seen him about a month ago, healthy, vibrant, and he suddenly died of advanced gastric cancer and left an unborn child as a result. So we start to see the results of healthcare providers playing Russian Roulette, getting the shots as they're…leading their patients, setting examples, getting their booster shots and getting injured from these experimental vaccines.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've lost all my friends during my medical training because they thought I was crazy. In the past year, I've witnessed alarming health issues among my colleagues. Out of 30 physicians at my clinic, two were diagnosed with aggressive cancer, and one died. It's become common to hear about physicians dying suddenly. Recently, a healthy family practice resident in his thirties died from advanced gastric cancer, leaving behind an unborn child. This situation highlights the risks healthcare providers face when they receive these experimental vaccines, which they promote to their patients while potentially suffering serious health consequences themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've lost every friend I had, through my medical training because they everyone thought I was nuts. I was crazy. But in the past year, I have seen what has happened when my friends have taken the shots. I used to work at Kaiser. It's a large, management group. And the clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians. And, you know, physician, we are usually trying to stay healthy, trying to avoid harms. We don't smoke. We don't drink. And unfortunately, in the past year, I have learned that 2 out of the 30 physician I worked with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer and one of them died, because of that. Almost monthly, I will hear 1 or 2 physician will die suddenly and most recently, we know this, family practice resident who's in his thirties, we have seen him about a month ago, healthy, vibrant, and he suddenly died of, advanced gastric cancer and and left an unborn child as a result. So we start to see the results of health care provider, playing the Russian roulette, getting the shots as their lead leading their physician leading their patients, setting examples, getting their booster shots and getting injured from these experimental vaccines.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(18/57) NURSE DAWN—“This is a huge tumor about the size of a softball behind my eye. And I had [metastases] to the back of my skull and 12 different areas of my bones.” In this clip taken from a 2023 interview with Children’s Health Defense, Dawn, a nurse, describes how she developed cancers throughout her body after receiving two Moderna COVID injections. Dawn describes how the cancer is “muscle-loving,” appearing throughout her body, and did not respond to treatment. Dawn also shows how she developed a “huge tumor about the size of a softball” behind her eye” and had “[metastases] to the back of [her] skull and 12 different areas of [her] bones.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I received my first Moderna shot in December 2020, followed by a second in January. Shortly after, I experienced severe headaches and vision changes, which I initially attributed to hormonal issues. An ER visit revealed a large tumor behind my eye and metastases in my skull and bones, diagnosed as myelosarcoma. This aggressive cancer is rare, typically found in children and dogs post-vaccination. I went through multiple hospitals before receiving treatment at Moffitt Cancer Center, including a clinical trial, chemotherapy, and radiation. After a few months of remission, the cancer returned in my pancreas, kidney, liver, and shoulder, as it can spread throughout the body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So after your 3rd, any injuries or you just Speaker 1: I had cancer at the time. Speaker 0: Oh, you're off your 3rd shot. I thought you said it's 5 months after. Speaker 1: That was after the booster. Okay. So, basically, I got the, first, shot Moderna in 2020 when they first came out at the end of December. And then I got the the other one in January, and then I ended up, having the worst headache of my life with, basically my eye was bulging on my head. It yeah. It was crushing my nasals and basically, it was causing vision changes. Speaker 0: Talk talk us through this. Speaker 1: It was causing vision changes where it was looking like seventies picture where where, like, color fades and everything. And, basically, at that time, my dog also had, like, a infection in his eye, so I was using his eye steroids. Speaker 0: So I thought it was just like a regular eye thing, and I checked into the ER. And that's how Speaker 1: I found out I had cancer. And basically Speaker 0: So what are we looking at here? These are your eyes. Speaker 1: Those are my eyes. This is a huge tumor about the size of a softball behind my eye, and I had METs to the back of my skull and 12 different areas of my bones. And, basically, what this cancer is, it's called, myelosarcoma, which is muscle loving. So it can go anywhere in your body. I How Speaker 0: but how my question is this. If it's 5 months after your Moderna shots, how long do you know how long it would take to grow a tumor that big? Speaker 1: I would they said it was the most aggressive cancer that they've seen, but I was developing mild headaches, like, after the Moderna shot, but I didn't think anything of it because I thought I was, perimenopausal because I had a hysterectomy. So I'm, like, I didn't know if I was because I still have my ovaries. Sorry. I'm talking with my hands. So I just basically thought it was just like a hormone thing. And then I they checked the pressure in my eye and my eye was bulging out of basically my head. The pressure was up and I found out. Speaker 0: They do to help you? Is that human out? Speaker 1: Basically, I got bounced around from hospital to hospital because nobody ever seen this type of tumor before. It's usually found in, little kids and also dogs after post rabies vaccinations. And, basically, I was transferred up to Tampa General, which is an hour away. They wanted to do a biopsy of it at the bedside because there wasn't enough operating rooms during COVID time, and I'm like, there's no way you're gonna do that to me. And then I ended up going to see a cancer specialist here. They didn't wanna touch me because they've never seen this before. So I ended up going to Moffett, Cancer Center, and they had to give me a pediatric, cancer doctor to take care of me that only seen a couple cases of this before in kids. And, basically, I ended up doing a medical clinical medical trial that's NIH approved and FDA approved. And I ended up over a 120 hours of chemotherapy. I had 90 sessions of radiation and over 40 days of staying in the hospital where they thought I was going to die. Speaker 0: And and then what happened? Speaker 1: And, basically, I had a few months of remission, and then the cancer came back again. Speaker 0: In the same place? Speaker 1: In a different place. This the second time it came back, it was in my pancreas and between my kidney and my liver and in my shoulder. And they said it because it's muscle loving, it can Speaker 0: show Speaker 1: up anywhere.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(19/57) MODERNA COVID INJECTION–TRIAL PARTICIPANT—“I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it was supposed to.” In this clip from a HighWire segment, we hear from a participant of Moderna’s COVID-injection “clinical trial” describe how she developed T-cell lymphoma—a type of cancer that originates from T cells, a type of white blood cell in the immune system—following receipt of her injection. Since being diagnosed, the trial participant notes that she’s been to the doctor approximately 200 times and has had four surgeries. Despite the doctors’ visits and surgeries, however, the participant notes her cancer has only become “worse.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's been over two years since I joined the Moderna trial, and I've had numerous doctor visits and surgeries. Recently, I went to my dermatologist for an unbearable itch, leading to a biopsy that suggested T cell lymphoma. Further biopsies confirmed the diagnosis. I was told it was a slow-moving cancer, but soon developed rashes treated with a powerful retinoid, which caused severe side effects. After a brief period of improvement, the lymphoma worsened, resulting in painful, bubbly rashes that made it difficult to wear normal clothing. A blood test revealed the presence of Caesare cells, indicating blood involvement. I believe this vaccine has contributed to the rapid progression of my rare cancer, and now I can only have faith in God.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's been just a little over 2 years since I joined the Moderna trial. And I've been to the doctor probably 200 times. I know I had 4 surgeries. And I've gotten worse. I went into my dermatologist for this itch on my back that was driving me crazy. It had been itching and itching. I couldn't stand it anymore. I couldn't sleep. So she did a biopsy, and almost 2 weeks go by, and then she calls me and she says, we saw something that looks suggestive of T cell lymphoma. So they did 4 more biopsies. 1 on my right arm, 1 on my back, 1 on my stomach, and then one on my left back's arm. And they all came back just suggestive of t cell lymphoma except for the one on my back's arm came back definite t cell lymphoma. They told me that you have a very slow moving cancer, and and don't worry, and everything's gonna be fine. Sure enough, a month later, I had a rash on my stomach and a rash on my back. They treated me with a very powerful retinoid called Acetritin. But unfortunately, I had a lot of severe side effects from it. It seemed to work on my skin for about a month or 2, but then it just stopped working. And I just had, like, this lymphoma explosion all over my skin. Very uncomfortable, like, bubbly rash. It burned, and clothing bothered me. I could only wear, like, nightgowns around the house that were very soft and loose dresses when I went anywhere. So they wanted to do another blood test, and then the Caesare cells showed up. That's what they call t cell lymphoma, and with blood involvement, they're called Caesare cells. I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it was supposed to. This is beyond my control. My only option is to just have faith in God.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(20/57) JILL KLEISS— “Shortly after I had my vaccine, two weeks later, I went to have my routine mammogram…[months later] I insisted on a biopsy…[and was told I] have the same breast cancer again [that I had prior to the ‘vaccine’] on the other side.” In this clip we hear from Jill Kleiss, also known as the Chemo Dancer on YouTube, who describes how she developed breast cancer following her COVID injection. Kleiss, who had had breast cancer prior to receiving the injection, developed cancer in the breast that had previously been healthy and cancer-free.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I had a mammogram that revealed a COVID node, which my doctor assured me was harmless. After receiving the vaccine, I had another mammogram, and again, they found a COVID node. My oncologist suggested a biopsy, which I insisted on despite initial resistance from my doctors. Eventually, they agreed to the biopsy. While substitute teaching, I received the call confirming my worst fear: I had breast cancer again, this time on the other side. I felt numb but reminded myself that I had overcome this before. If I hadn't detected the cancer through the enlarged lymph node, it might have gone unnoticed for a year, allowing the HER2 positive cancer to spread.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I had a mammogram. The doctors found something, and they told me it was a COVID node. She told me the COVID node was nothing to worry about, and my biggest fear was having to have chemo again. It was really hard to go through, but luckily, I only needed surgery and I didn't have to have chemo. Then COVID hit and I knew I had a compromised immunity. So I knew I wanted to get the vaccine as soon as possible. Shortly after I had my vaccine, 2 weeks later, I went to have my routine mammogram. The doctors found something, and they told me it was a COVID node. She told me the COVID node was nothing to worry about. It happened with a vaccine. So we'll check it 3 months later with an ultrasound. And then I went to see my surgeon, oncologist, and he said, Jill, you have a COVID note. I said, yeah. I looked into that. I said, nothing to worry about, I was told. And he said, when you get the ultrasound, you should do a biopsy too. So I insisted on a biopsy. They didn't wanna do it. I knew I had to be aggressive on this one. Everybody tried to discourage me. My doctors tried to discourage me. There was a lot of back and forth. And then finally, I got agreement that they were going to do a biopsy. I went back to work, substitute teaching, and I'm on the playground, and I get the call. And as soon as she picked up the call, I knew. I said, it's bad news, isn't it? And she said, you have the same breast cancer again on the other side. I was kind of numb of, okay, Jill. You did it before. You can do it again and just get through it. If I hadn't found the cancer to the enlarged lymph node that my body was alerting me I had cancer, I would have been dead in a year because they would have found the cancer till 1 year later in my next mammogram when HER2 positive had invaded my body.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(21/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—“[After receiving his COVID injection], all of the sudden he had multiple cancers, fluid buildup around the heart, [and] pneumonia.” In this clip from a Children’s Health Defense bus story, we hear from a gentleman who describes a cousin of his who developed brain and lung cancer following receipt of his COVID injection. The gentleman notes that his cousin subsequently died—the time between the development of the cancers and death was less than a year.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the summer of 2022, I saw my cousin, who had just retired and was dealing with back issues. Shortly after, he was found to have fluid around his heart and was diagnosed with lung cancer. His surgery for the back was postponed for treatment, but they couldn't identify the cause of the fluid. Eventually, he was also diagnosed with brain cancer. Due to his deteriorating condition, they decided against radiation after chemotherapy. He developed pneumonia while hospitalized and passed away in January. From being relatively healthy in July, he faced multiple severe health issues in a short time. His family was fully vaccinated, and his daughter was particularly cautious during COVID, not allowing anyone in the house.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I also have a cousin. It is 2023 right now. He summer of 2022, I had seen him 4th July. He was a a union brother as well. He had some back problems. He had just retired. And he was supposed to go in for surgery for his back, but he was discovered to have fluid build up around the heart and also was diagnosed with lung cancer. He went in for treatment, and they paused the surgery for his back. He went in for treatment for the lung cancer, and they couldn't find out what was causing the the fluid around the heart. And, subsequently, they also discovered he had brain cancer. And then, ultimately, they 4 they decided not to go with the radiation after the chemo because he was in such bad shape. And then he developed pneumonia while in the hospital and subsequently passed away in, I think it was January. So from 4th of July, he was totally fine other than the back problem. Right? He had a little he'd always had back trouble, degenerative discs. But then all of a sudden, multiple cancers, fluid build up around the heart, pneumonia. And you knew that he took the shot? Yes. His daughter wouldn't even let them in the house during COVID because she was so afraid. So there is no doubt in my mind their whole family was fully up to date. His wife, my other cousin, I know I know she has taken it. I know I know he had taken it. And and, you know, how many, I don't know, but I definitely know that they were they were vaccinated.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(22/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—”I…have three aunts that had turbo cancer from the COVID shot. They all died last year. Within months of each other.” A woman describes for Children’s Health Defense how three of her aunts all developed turbo cancer following their receipt of one or more COVID injections. She notes they all died within months of each other.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have three aunts who developed aggressive cancer after receiving the COVID vaccine, and they all passed away last year within months of each other. One had pancreatic cancer, which is known for its rapid progression. The other two aunts had different types of cancer, but the family is not discussing the details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I do have 3 aunts that had turbo cancer from the COVID shot. They all died last year within months of each other. What kind of cancer? One had pancreatic cancer, which I know is a fast cancer anyway. It does spread very quickly. The other 2, I don't even know. The family won't even talk about it. These are my cousins, of course, but my aunt's children.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(23/57) JEREMIAH’S AUNT, NANCY ARCHER—“I think [it] took, from her last shot, approximately, 12 months to get to that point where medicine didn’t even think they had an answer [for her cancer].” In this Children’s Health Defense bus interview, we hear from Jeremiah, who describes how his aunt, Nancy Archer, died of turbo cancer following receipt of a Pfizer COVID injection. “It was heartbreaking to watch her succumb to turbo cancer from the effects of the shot,” Jeremiah says. He notes that she only took the injection because she wanted to ensure that she could travel freely between her homes in the U.S. and Guatemala. The timespan between Nancy’s receipt of her final Pfizer injection and her turbo cancer–caused death was approximately one year according to Jeremiah.

Video Transcript AI Summary
My aunt, Nancy Archer, was a loving massage therapist and healer who supported me through tough times. Despite her belief in natural medicine, she got the Pfizer vaccine due to fear of being stranded while living on a tight budget in Guatemala. After her second shot, she felt a lump in her abdomen but chose to treat it naturally instead of seeking medical help. Over time, her condition worsened, and the VA struggled to diagnose her, eventually revealing widespread cancer. She opted out of chemotherapy and spent her remaining months with family. Although she didn't want to discuss it, she acknowledged that the vaccine might have contributed to her illness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We are live. Can you tell us your name, please? Speaker 1: My name is Jeremiah Blonde. Speaker 0: Alright. And this is a story about your aunt? Speaker 1: Yes. My my aunt, Nancy Archer, who was I was very close with. She had been there for me all my life and through my father's death and many other really trying times. And, she was a massage therapist and a healer. And, she healed me a lot and, just was there for me. And for so many people, she was loving, and it's, very into natural medicine and not going along with what the government has people do. But for some reason, she took the, Pfizer vaccine. Speaker 0: Why do you think that was if she was so into natural? What happened? Speaker 1: Well, she lived on a very tight social security budget. So she lived half the year in Guatemala, and she has a family there and people there. And, she was very afraid that she would be stranded somewhere. And, so she got the first shot and she's like, oh no more not doing that again. And then I think a month or 2 later she go she went ahead and got the second shot before she flew out to Guatemala. And so while she was in Guatemala she, started feeling like a lump in her gut and, like a hard sensation from the inside and out and, she, you know, wanted to treat it naturally whatever it was but she really didn't want to know so she didn't come back to the States and go to the doctor and, she basically wanted to heal naturally, meditation, those kinds of things and, she just started feeling worse and worse and felt the the lump getting bigger and bigger. And she, finally went through the VA and it took them a long time to make any kind of determination, but they were vacillating between ovarian cancer and mesentery cancer and, what is that? The appendix cancer. Just like and then eventually got to a point where they said, what? We don't we can't really help you. It's everywhere in your abdomen. And that was about I think that took from the her last shot approximately, 12 months to get to that point where, medicine didn't even think they had answer. So she chose to, go without chemo and, she lasted a few more months. We had a family reunion with her and she knew she was gonna go, but it was very hard to watch her. And, of course, I advised her many times not to get the shot and and it was heartbreaking to, watch her succumb to what I what I feel are super, sorry, terrible cancer from the effects of the shot. Speaker 0: Did she think that the shot gave her the cancer? Did she ever talk about it? Speaker 1: She didn't really wanna talk about it, but she knows that I I mean, I talked to her about it, but I was also trying to focus on and and helping her. But, yeah, I think she acknowledged she did acknowledge that it was most likely from the shot at one point.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(24/57) 2024 Study Published in Cureus Shows Significant Cancer Increase in Japan Following the Rollout of the COVID Injections in the Country Title: Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan Authors: Miki Gibo, et al. Published: April 8, 2024 Journal: Cureus Key excerpts: “No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer (including ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer) after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022.” “In 2020, the first year of the pandemic, there was significant deficit mortality for all causes (< 99% lower PI) and no excess mortality for all cancers. However, in 2021, there was significant excess mortality of 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 1.1% (>95% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the excesses increased to 9.6% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the number of excess deaths was 115,799 (95%CI: 106,018, 125,501) for all causes and 7,162 (95%CI: 4,786, 9,522) for all cancers.” Link: https://www.proquest.com/openview/4513714a8a02ac4e05aed1faa662214c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2045583

Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan - ProQuest Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform. proquest.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(25/57) “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” Title: Which Could Be the Risk Factors for Developing Cancer After Receiving The COVID-19 Vaccine? Authors: Huang, W. L Published: January 28, 2023 Journal: International Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy Key Excerpts: “There are several articles in the literature after the COVID-19 pandemic showing the necessity of vaccinating people who have a cancer diagnosis to prevent this disease in this group of patients. But what I want to report in this article is that I am facing an increasing number of cases of patients with cancer after receiving COVID-19 vaccines and this is what I want to describe in this study, using the thoughts of Hippocrates (460 bce - 375 bce), the father of medicine, that said that ‘it is more important to consider other ancient medical traditions prior to the knowledge we have nowadays.’” “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” “The conclusion of this study is that patients that are developing cancer after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine have in common, energy deficiency inside the five internal massive organs (and these alterations are the factors to induce cancer formation according to traditional Chinese medicine) and the use of this kind of vaccine has the potential to reduce even more the vital energy of the patient which is already very low and leading to a weakness state of the immune system and increasing the chance to have any kind of chronic diseases, in this case, cancer.” Link: https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/which-could-be-the-risk-factors-for-developing-cancer-after-receiving-the-covid19-vaccine.pdf

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(26/57) “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” Title: Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: September 15, 2023 Journal: Journal of Experimental and Clinical Sciences Key Excerpts: “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” “In this study we describe all aspects of this case and discuss possible causal links between the rapid emergence of this metastatic cancer and mRNA vaccination. We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer. The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10620857/

Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19. The wife of the patient, since deceased, gave the consent for publishing the case. The ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(27/57) “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Title: Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Authors: Alberto Rubio-Casillas, et al. Published: May 2024 Journal: International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Key Excerpts: “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323

Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Due to the health emergency created by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the COVID-19 disease, the rapid implementation of a new vaccine technology wa… sciencedirect.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(28/57) “Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease.” Title: Oncogenesis and autoimmunity as a result of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: April 23, 2024 Journal: TechRxiv PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In summary, the Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease. These mechanisms are consistent with both epidemiological findings and case reports.” Link: https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.22541/au.171387387.73158754

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(29/57) “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination…The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Title: Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine Authors: Yilmaz, Abdurrahman, et al. Published: April–June 2024 Journal: JBJS Case Connector Key Excerpts: “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is presented and may be explained by CD4 and CD8 cell infiltration. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Link: https://journals.lww.com/jbjscc/abstract/2024/06000/primary_cutaneous_adenoid_cystic_carcinoma_in_a.7.aspx

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(30/57) “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Title: mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review Authors: Alberto Boretti Published: January 27, 2024 Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine Key Excerpts: “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10238-023-01264-1

mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review - Clinical and Experimental Medicine Over the last 24 months, there has been growing evidence of a correlation between mRNA COVID-19 vaccine boosters and increased prevalence of COVID link.springer.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(31/57) “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” Title: Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs Authors: Stephanie Seneff, et al. Published: June 2022 Journal: Food and Chemical Toxicology Key Excerpts: “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” “In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.” “These vaccinations have now been shown to downregulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

ScienceDirectScienceDirect sciencedirect.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(32/57) “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” Title: A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature Authors: Patrizia Gentilini, et al. Published: Posted April 1, 2024 Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” “A time interval of 16 weeks from the second vaccination to the diagnosis of cancer was noted.” Link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Panagis-Polykretis/publication/379538444_A_Case_Report_of_Acute_Lymphoblastic_Leukaemia_ALLLymphoblastic_Lymphoma_LBL_Following_the_Second_Dose_of_ComirnatyR_An_Analysis_of_the_Potential_Pathogenic_Mechanism_Based_on_of_the_Existing_Literatu/links/6615050439e7641c0ba6c7f8/A-Case-Report-of-Acute-Lymphoblastic-Leukaemia-ALL-Lymphoblastic-Lymphoma-LBL-Following-the-Second-Dose-of-ComirnatyR-An-Analysis-of-the-Potential-Pathogenic-Mechanism-Based-on-of-the-Existing-Literat.pdf

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(33/57) “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Title: Fatal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case Authors: Yusuke Ueda, et al. Published: November 6, 2023 Journal: Immunological Medicine Key Excerpts: “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25785826.2024.2338594

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(34/57) “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Title: SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Authors: Raquel Valdes Angues, et al. Published: December 17, 2023 Journal: Cureus Key Excerpts: “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792266/

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Cancer is a complex and dynamic disease. The “hallmarks of cancer” were proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg (2000) as a group of biological competencies that human cells attain as they progress from normalcy to neoplastic transformation. These ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(35/57) “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Title: Metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy unmasked by a COVID booster vaccine Authors: Kavya Bharathidasan, et al. Published: November 28, 2023 Journal: Clinical Case Reports Key Excerpts: “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ccr3.8278

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(36/57) “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Title: BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence Authors: Ulrike Kämmerer, et al. Published: December 3, 2024 Journal: Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Key Excerpts: “We further analyzed RNA and DNA contents of these vials and identified large amounts of DNA after RNase A digestion in all lots with concentrations ranging from 32.7 ng to 43.4 ng per clinical dose. This far exceeds the maximal acceptable concentration of 10 ng per clinical dose that has been set by international regulatory authorities.” “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Link: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/

BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Background: BNT162b2 RNA-based COVID-19 injections are specified to transfect human cells to efficiently produce spike proteins for an immune response. publichealthpolicyjournal.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(37/57) “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold.” Title: DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent 2 Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events Authors: David J. Speicher, et al. Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold…Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs.” Link: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97

DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events. Background: In vitro transcription (IVT) reactions used to generate nucleoside modified RNA (modRNA) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently rely on an RNA polymerase transcribing from a DNA template. Production of modRNA used in the original Pfizer randomized clinical trial (RCT) utilized a PCR-generated DNA template (Process 1). To generate billions of vaccine doses, this DNA was cloned into a bacterial plasmid vector for amplification in Escherichia coli before linearization (Process 2), expanding the size and complexity of potential residual DNA and introducing sequences not present in the Process 1 template. It appears that Moderna used a similar plasmid-based process for both clinical trial and post-trial use vaccines. Recently, DNA sequencing studies have revealed this plasmid DNA at significant levels in both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA vaccines. These studies surveyed a limited number of lots and questions remain regarding the variance in residual DNA observed internationally. Methods: Using previously published primer and probe sequences, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Qubit® fluorometry was performed on an additional 27 mRNA vials obtained in Canada and drawn from 12 unique lots (5 lots of Moderna child/adult monovalent, 1 lot of Moderna adult bivalent BA.4/5, 1 lot of Moderna child/adult bivalent BA.1, 1 lot of Moderna XBB.1.5 monovalent, 3 lots of Pfizer adult monovalent, and 1 lot of Pfizer adult bivalent BA.4/5). The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was queried for the number and categorization of adverse events (AEs) reported for each of the lots tested. The content of one previously studied vial of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was examined by Oxford Nanopore sequencing to determine the size distribution of DNA fragments. This sample was also used to determine if the residual DNA is packaged in the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and thus resistant to DNaseI or if the DNA resides outside of the LNP and is DNaseI labile.  Results: Quantification cycle (Cq) values (1:10 dilution) for the plasmid origin of replication (ori) and spike sequences ranged from 18.44 - 24.87 and 18.03 - 23.83 and for Pfizer, and 22.52 – 24.53 and 25.24 – 30.10 for Moderna, respectively. These values correspond to 0.28 – 4.27 ng/dose and 0.22 - 2.43 ng/dose (Pfizer), and 0.01 -0.34 ng/dose and 0.25 – 0.78 ng/dose (Moderna), for ori and spike respectively measured by qPCR, and 1,896 – 3,720 ng/dose and 3,270 – 5,100 ng/dose measured by Qubit® fluorometry for Pfizer and Moderna, respectfully. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori was only detected in Pfizer vials with Cq scores ranging from 16.64 – 22.59. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). This relationship was different for the Pfizer and Moderna products. Size distribution analysis found mean and maximum DNA fragment lengths of 214 base pairs (bp) and 3.5 kb, respectively. The plasmid DNA is likely inside the LNPs and is protected from nucleases. Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing. osf.io

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(38/57) “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Title: The genomic instability associated with integrated simian virus 40 DNA is dependent on the origin of replication and early control region Authors: D J Hunter, et al. Published: February 1, 1994 Journal: Journal of Virology Key Excerpts: “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Link: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.68.2.787-796.1994?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(39/57) “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Title: Guidance for Industry Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications Authors: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Key Excerpts: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Link: https://www.fda.gov/media/78428/download

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(40/57) SENIOR RESEARCH SCIENTIST STEPHANIE SENEFF—"Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines...This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause..." To start the VAERS portion of this turbo-cancer mega thread, we have senior research scientist at MIT Stephanie Seneff describing for Dr. William Makis, Zen Honeycutt, et al. how the COVID injections are heavily associated with various cancers according to numerous reports in VAERS. "Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines," Seneff says. "It's hugely more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that were received in that year, so it's way out of line with the other [non-COVID] vaccines." "This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause," Seneff adds. She notes that for VAERS reports of cancer regarding flu jabs, there are "practically none," which means the ratio of how often the COVID injections cause cancer versus flu jabs is "infinity." As for mechanism of action, Seneff highlights one paper describing PD-L1 overexpression as a result of the COVID injections, which, in turn, can increase one's odds of developing cancer. (PD-L1, Seneff notes, is a "molecule that's produced by both cancer cells and immune cells" that "prevents... immune cells from responding to both the... COVID virus, but also to cancer.") Seneff notes that the paper shows a "dramatic difference" in overexpression of PD-L1 in the control group versus the group recently injected with the COVID jabs, with the latter group showing far more of it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, collects data on vaccine-related adverse events. Analysis shows that in 2021, 98% of cancer-related reports were linked to COVID vaccines, significantly higher than other vaccines. A comparison with the flu vaccine revealed virtually no cancer cases associated with it, highlighting a stark contrast. Research indicates that PD L1, a receptor produced by cancer and immune cells, may contribute to this issue. Elevated PD L1 levels were observed two days after vaccination, suggesting an activated immune system may suppress responses to both COVID and cancer. This nonspecific immunosuppressive effect raises concerns about the potential for increased cancer risk following vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Couple of examples here of data from the VAERS. VAERS is this database that the US government maintains. And I have spent a lot of time looking through VAERS. We did a lot of analysis. Speaker 1: Just one minute for people who don't know what VAERS is. It's the vaccine adverse event reporting system that has been set up by the CDC that doctors and patients can report, vaccine adverse events, for afterwards. Yeah. Speaker 0: And it's a very valuable database for looking at what's going on with the different vaccines. And so, in this same paper, food and chemical toxicology, we have a lot of data on various numbers on the counts of occurrences of different things with the COVID vaccines compared to all the other vaccines that were delivered in 2021. And the numbers are just astonishing because these are different words that are related to cancer, cancer lymphoma, leukemia, metastasis, carcinoma, neoplasm. So, we could look at the counts in the various database for that year, which was when the vaccine was introduced, for all the COVID vaccines and then for all vaccines altogether. And you can see that almost all of the cases, you know, 98% of the mentions of cancer were COVID vaccines. It's hugely highly more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that were received in that year. So it's way out of line with the other vaccines. And this is something that I found on the web. There's another analysis of, again, the same database. They compared the COVID vaccine to the flu vaccine. So this is the COVID vaccine, this is the flu vaccine, the counts for these 2 different vaccines normalized by the total number of vaccines administered. And for neoplasm, breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, prostate cancer, brain neoplasms. All these different conditions, you can see the numbers here for COVID, there's practically none for the flu vaccine. So in many cases, the ratio is infinity. So this is just very striking to me that that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause. And now you can see some of the evidence of why that might be. And this was a very interesting paper to me about this PD L1, overexpression of PD L1. That is a very dangerous thing to have because that is going to link to cancer. And so this was measured 2 days after the 2nd vaccine. So they'd had their 2 vaccine series. And a quote from the paper, an activated immune system needs to be regulated to avoid autoimmune collateral damage. And that's what's going on. There's such an intense reaction that the immune system cuts back and it tries to stop it by elevating this PD L1. You can see here's the control data and this is the, the vaccine recipient. Speaker 1: Stephanie, can you just tell us a little bit what is PD L1? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I will get to that in a moment, but it is a particular, receptor. It's a molecule that's produced by both cancer cells and immune cells. And it basically, just like IgG4 in a way, gets in the way. It blocks, the immune cells. It says stand down. It prevents the immune cells from responding to both the virus, the COVID virus, but also to cancer. So it can cause again, a dangerous increase in the potential of having cancer. And you can see this dramatic difference between the controls and the people 2 days after the vaccine. Vaccinations may have a nonspecific immunosuppressive effect lasting for a certain period of time. This is a quote from this paper. So they're concerned about this nonspecific, meaning that it could suppress the immune system response to cancer.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(41/57) VAERS ID 1220913: “HUSBAND DIED BECAUSE OF TERMINAL PANCREATIC CANCER.” (One dose of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/e0iryfdfLg

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(42/57) VAERS ID 2184304: “HE HAD 2 LUMBAR SPINE X-RAYS ON OR ABOUT JULY 16, 2021, WHICH SHOWED LESIONS ON HIS SPINE…FROM THAT POINT ON I WATCHED THE TUMORS APPEAR ON HIS BODY AND HEAD. HE DIED 9/7/2021.” (Two doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/t0ZBbVpa7k

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(43/57) VAERS ID 2785362: “TURBO CANCER RAPIDLY SPREAD THROUGHOUT HER BODY, EVENTUALLY WINDING UP IN HER SPINE AND BRAIN…TAKING HER LIFE.” (Three doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/haWd0l5sfX

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(44/57) VAERS ID 1037833: “SHE [WAS] INFORMED THAT 3 DAYS AFTER THE SHOT, SHE HAD [A] CT WITH CONTRAST FOR STAGE 1 LUNG CANCER.” (One Pfizer COVID injection.) https://t.co/33rfHuGu3O

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(45/57) VAERS ID 1248298: “PATIENT PRESENTS TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ONE DAY AFTER VACCINATION…FOUND TO HAVE WIDELY METASTATIC...CANCER INVOLVING CHEST, ABDOMEN, AND PELVIS.” (Two Moderna COVID injections.) https://t.co/uOZEvqujz3

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(46/57) VAERS ID 1290185: “PATIENT STATES THAT WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF THE FIRST VACCINE SHE NOTICED BREAST SWELLING, NIPPLE INVERSION AND TENDER AXILA OF THE RIGHT BREAST…[SHE NOW HAS] INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA.” https://t.co/zPtBA8zDXq

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(47/57) SYMPTOMS TEXT SEARCH: CARCINOMA; TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTS: 923 Note that in the context of the COVID injections, searching a single cancer-related term like “carcinoma” turns up more than 900 reports. Also note that VAERS reports are only a small fraction of the true number of adverse-event cases. According to one study performed by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. in 2011, it is estimated that VAERS is underreported by a factor of 100 or more. Source: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(48/57) “I HAVE A FAMILY MEMBER WHO WAS IMMUNO-COMPROMISED, FORCED TO TAKE [THE] VACCINE TO KEEP [THEIR] JOB, [AND] NOW HAS TURBO CANCER & [IS] FIGHTING FOR [THEIR] LIFE.” https://t.co/Q8Qzyg4DFa

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(49/57) “MY EX TOOK IT...HE DIED 9 MONTHS LATER WITH TURBO CANCER.” https://t.co/TVMaGjcENk

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(50/57) “MY WIFE HAD HER BREAST CANCER IN CHECK BUT WAS MANDATED TO TAKE THE COVID SHOT [WHEN] SHE WAS A SCHOOL TEACHER. TURBO CANCER AND GONE IN 5 WEEKS.” https://t.co/EN9DlNUn51

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(51/57) “I LOST MY BELOVED MOTHER TO METASTATIC CANCER (SARCOMA KIDNEYS AND LUNGS) IN AUG [20]23. SHE DECLINED AFTER HER 5TH VACCINE (MODERNA) IN SEPT [20]22.” https://t.co/U2j0M8H6ja

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(52/57) “MY MUM WAS A HEALTHY, INDEPENDENT, OUT-EVERYDAY WOMAN UNTIL SHE GOT THE SHOT. 2 DAYS LATER SHE HAD BLEEDING BEHIND HER EYES, A FEW MONTHS AFTER THAT, DIAGNOSED WITH LUNG AND BRAIN CANCER…3 DAYS AFTER DIAGNOSIS PASSED AWAY.” https://t.co/8DtdEnuuoX

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(53/57) “I’VE LOST 5 OF MY FRIENDS (45-55 ALL VAXXED) ALL HAD WHAT I’D DESCRIBE AS TURBO CANCERS THAT SPREAD TOO QUICKLY FOR TREATMENT IN SOME CASES.” https://t.co/akzGIRHMJI

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(54/57) “MY [MOTHER IN LAW] WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BRAIN CANCER THIS PAST APRIL, THEY DID OPERATE, BUT 8 [WEEKS] LATER, SHE DIED. SHE WAS [VACCINATED] AT LEAST TWICE THAT WE KNOW OF.” https://t.co/tBT856ql5Z

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(55/57) “I HAVE A 47 YEAR OLD FRIEND WHO DIED THIS WEEK. TURBO CANCER. VAX AND BOOSTED. BRAIN TUMORS AND STAGE 4 COLON CANCER IN A MATTER OF MONTHS. DIED A YEAR LATER.” https://t.co/BLWLdls5oy

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(56/57) “MY DAD PASSED AWAY IN MAY FROM TURBO CANCER! HE WAS DIAGNOSED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2023, 8 MONTHS LATER HE DIED. HE WAS EXTREMELY HEALTHY, AND IN EXCELLENT SHAPE. HE TOOK 2 SHOTS WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE…” https://t.co/0kJ587txVP

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(57/57) “LOST MY FRIEND IN FEBRUARY TO A TURBO CANCER. SHE WENT FROM NO CANCER TO BONE CANCER AND STOMACH CANCER TO DEAD IN SEVERAL MONTHS. HER FAMILY PRESSURED HER TO TAKE THE SHOTS.” https://t.co/cQ66egypct

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(ADDENDUM TWEET 1) “You know, if you just read the pamphlet that comes with the COVID-19 vaccines, it says COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for…carcinogenicity…[Meaning] It hasn't been tested to see if it causes cancer.” In this clip, EMT and whistleblower Harry Fisher shows us the package insert that comes with the COMIRNATY injection (i.e. Pfizer’s ostensibly FDA approved COVID injection). He notes that the insert says that the injection has not been tested for potential carcinogenicity. Fisher notes that this means that “it hasn’t been tested to see if it causes cancer.” “They're constantly telling us it [the COVID injection] can't cause cancer, and they haven't even studied to see if it can,” Fisher adds. “They write it right there in the pamphlet.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The COVID-19 vaccine pamphlet states that comorbidity has not been evaluated for potential causes of carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or male fertility impairment. It specifically mentions that carcinogenicity has not been tested, meaning there's no evidence to confirm whether it can cause cancer. Genotoxicity refers to the potential for a substance to damage genetic information, which could lead to mutations and cancer. Despite claims that the vaccine cannot cause cancer, the lack of studies on this aspect is noted in the pamphlet. Additionally, concerns about male fertility are raised.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, if you just read the pamphlet that comes with the COVID 19 vaccines, it says, comorbidity has not been evaluated for the potential cause, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or the impairment of male fertility. Carcinogenicity, it hasn't been tested to see if it causes cancer. And genotoxicity, the ability of a chemical, physical, or biological agent to damage a cell's genetic information, which can lead to mutations and potential cancer. They're constantly telling us it can't cause cancer, and they haven't even studied to see if it can. They write it right there in the pamphlet. And then there's the male fertility part. God bless.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(ADDENDUM TWEET 2) PLEASE ADD YOUR OWN PERSONAL TURBO-CANCER STORY TO THIS THREAD. For me: My first cousin once removed died of turbo cancer at the age of 40 and left behind one young son. Also: my uncle was diagnosed with skin cancer following his injection; my former barber was diagnosed with prostate cancer following his injection; my best friend’s father was diagnosed with colon cancer following his injection.

Saved - February 3, 2025 at 5:47 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“I was fired after 31 years - for saying people with natural immunity didn’t need an experimental Covid Vaccine” “The Covid shots have caused damage than anything else in history - because the Toxic Spike Protein ends up EVERYWHERE in your body” https://t.co/znuYWQzaLC

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was fired after 31 years as an emergency room physician without any patient complaints. My dismissal was due to my belief that individuals with natural immunity did not need vaccination. While I lost over 50% of my income and can no longer work in the emergency room, I still maintain my private practice. I discovered that Pfizer's biodistribution studies revealed the vaccines spread throughout the body, not just remaining in the arm. The messenger RNA from the vaccines affects various organs, including the brain, lungs, heart, liver, reproductive organs, and bone marrow. This widespread distribution is why the COVID vaccines have resulted in a broader range of side effects than any other medical treatment in history.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was fired after 31 years as an emergency room physician with not one single patient complaint against me in those 31 years. I was fired for saying that somebody who had natural immunity didn't need to be vaccinated against a disease to which they were already immune. Fortunately, I still have my medical license even though I lost a significant part at least 50% of my income and I couldn't work as an emergency room doctor anymore. I still have my private practice. So when I discovered from the, the biodistribution studies that Pfizer had hidden, that we knew that these vaccines go around your entire body, they do not just stay in your arm, Pfizer's biodistribution studies on the lipid nanoparticles show that they literally take those messenger RNA strands into every part of your body that go into your brain and your lungs and your heart and your liver and your reproductive organs and your bone marrow and everywhere, which is, by the way, why these COVID shots have caused a greater array of side effects than any other medical treatment in history because this toxic spike protein ends up in literally every every part of your body
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 1:45 PM

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@DiedSuddenly_ The COVID VAX is Noneffective Poison! Ruining immune systems w/mRNA gene therapy so-called “vaccine" causes myocarditis, cancers, diabetes & others. Experimental mRNA is the largest medical HOAX in history! Millions of people died or permanently damaged. https://t.co/FKZE78J3yY

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

THE VACCINE IS KILLING PEOPLE: "I'm gonna be very clear about this and I recently just testified in the U.S. Senate, December 7th 2022. The Vaccine is Killing people and it's killing large numbers of people." Credible Estimate of 17 million global deaths from the Covid Vaccines.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently testified in the US Senate on December 7th, 2022. I want to be very clear: the vaccine is killing people, and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality for a medicinal product causing death. As of December 23rd, 2022, the CDC has recorded over sixteen thousand Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine, and that's probably a gross underreport. I was recently at a conference in Romania on the COVID crisis. There was a lot of work trying to unpack what we actually understand, and I saw a credible estimate of something like seventeen million deaths globally from this technology. When you scale up to billions, it's not hard to reach a number like that with a technology this dangerous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm gonna be very clear about this, and I've recently just testified in the US Senate December seventh twenty twenty two. The vaccine is killing people, and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality for a medicinal product causing death. Our CDC, as of 12/23/2022, has over sixteen thousand Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine. And that's probably a gross underreport. Speaker 1: Yep. There was a press I was recently at a conference, in Romania on the COVID crisis, And so there was a lot of work trying to unpack what we actually understand, and I saw a credible estimate of something like seventeen million deaths globally from this technology. Speaker 0: Seventeen million deaths from the COVID vax? Speaker 1: Well, when, you know, when you scale up to billions, it's not hard to reach a number like that with a technology this dangerous.
View Full Interactive Feed